WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Essentially either the SEC refused to acknowledge them, told them

2
00:00:03.120 --> 00:00:06.519
<v Speaker 1>to withdraw, basically said this isn't happening, which isn't all

3
00:00:06.519 --> 00:00:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that surprising. I mean, if you look at some little

4
00:00:08.400 --> 00:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits out there against coinbase, Kracken, you name it, they

5
00:00:12.759 --> 00:00:15.679
<v Speaker 1>basically flat out calls allonta security and say they're not

6
00:00:15.759 --> 00:00:16.679
<v Speaker 1>going to mess with that thing.

7
00:00:22.120 --> 00:00:24.399
<v Speaker 2>This content is brought to you by bitco, which is

8
00:00:24.440 --> 00:00:27.719
<v Speaker 2>one of the top crypto custodians in the crypto industry.

9
00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Bitco works with many big companies and brands such as

10
00:00:31.359 --> 00:00:36.479
<v Speaker 2>Pantera Capital, Bitstamp, and bitcoin Ira. Nike also selected Bitgo

11
00:00:36.679 --> 00:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>to power its wallets for its NFTs, and bitco has

12
00:00:40.679 --> 00:00:44.280
<v Speaker 2>many great services such as hot wallets, custodial wallets, self

13
00:00:44.320 --> 00:00:49.200
<v Speaker 2>managed cold wallets, and NFT wallets. Many institutions trust bitco

14
00:00:49.359 --> 00:00:53.439
<v Speaker 2>with its top level security and incredible services such as

15
00:00:53.439 --> 00:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>being able to deploy your capital while it's in custody,

16
00:00:56.399 --> 00:01:00.359
<v Speaker 2>which includes lending, borrowing, trading, staking, DeFi access and more.

17
00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:03.079
<v Speaker 2>If you'd like to learn more about bitco, please visit

18
00:01:03.119 --> 00:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>bitgo dot com link in a description. Welcome to the

19
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Thinking Crypto Podcast. I'm your host, Tony Edward and with

20
00:01:08.920 --> 00:01:13.079
<v Speaker 2>me is James Seyferd, who's an ETF research analyst at Bloomberg. James,

21
00:01:13.120 --> 00:01:13.719
<v Speaker 2>great to see you.

22
00:01:14.760 --> 00:01:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, happy to be back, Tony. It's been a while well.

23
00:01:17.680 --> 00:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>James has been good though.

24
00:01:18.959 --> 00:01:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the summer has been good, although I wish we

25
00:01:21.200 --> 00:01:24.000
<v Speaker 2>were talking in better terms. As far as the market,

26
00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:27.040
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of bloody right now. What are you seeing

27
00:01:27.079 --> 00:01:28.719
<v Speaker 2>on your end? What are you hearing from people? Do

28
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>you think this is just the normal seasonal uh, you

29
00:01:31.879 --> 00:01:34.239
<v Speaker 2>know set up where they say September is usually not great,

30
00:01:34.280 --> 00:01:35.920
<v Speaker 2>but in Q four starts to do well.

31
00:01:36.760 --> 00:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's we're just coming now out of

32
00:01:40.040 --> 00:01:42.079
<v Speaker 1>the summer, right And I feel like if you look

33
00:01:42.079 --> 00:01:45.239
<v Speaker 1>at trading volumes on anything it's been, it's pretty standard

34
00:01:45.239 --> 00:01:46.799
<v Speaker 1>for them to go down in that time of year.

35
00:01:46.840 --> 00:01:50.719
<v Speaker 1>There's less things happening, and I guess that's translated over

36
00:01:50.840 --> 00:01:55.359
<v Speaker 1>into crypto. So yeah, I mean, I'm not surprised by

37
00:01:55.359 --> 00:01:57.159
<v Speaker 1>any of this. I mean, if you if you look

38
00:01:57.200 --> 00:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>at anything, I mean it's it's Honestly, I said this

39
00:01:59.719 --> 00:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, which like some people jump down my throw

40
00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:03.879
<v Speaker 1>for but it kind of reminds me of the way

41
00:02:03.920 --> 00:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>things were trading in twenty twenty before COVID and then

42
00:02:07.680 --> 00:02:10.159
<v Speaker 1>even right after, like it just kept hitting like that,

43
00:02:10.639 --> 00:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, right around that eleven twelve K mark down

44
00:02:13.719 --> 00:02:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to seven and so on, and like that that happened

45
00:02:16.719 --> 00:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>for like eighteen months straight, it felt like, and that's

46
00:02:18.919 --> 00:02:20.879
<v Speaker 1>what it feels like this to me kind of I

47
00:02:20.919 --> 00:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>know it hasn't been quite that long yet, but it

48
00:02:22.800 --> 00:02:25.039
<v Speaker 1>just that same range kind of feel similar. It's like

49
00:02:25.080 --> 00:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that fifty fifty five to like near seventy just keeps happening,

50
00:02:29.719 --> 00:02:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's like we're just keep hitting sixty and fifty

51
00:02:31.879 --> 00:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>eight over and over and over again. And it just

52
00:02:33.719 --> 00:02:35.879
<v Speaker 1>feels like how it felt to me when I kept hitting,

53
00:02:35.960 --> 00:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>like staying right around ten k. It just feels similar.

54
00:02:40.159 --> 00:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And obviously, like when you're thinking about this, like I

55
00:02:43.520 --> 00:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>never like to look to the historical price action for

56
00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>what's actually going on. It's just the vibes feel very

57
00:02:48.879 --> 00:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>similar to me. People were very down and out on

58
00:02:50.840 --> 00:02:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the prospects for the market in general, specifically bitcoin, and yeah,

59
00:02:57.800 --> 00:03:00.080
<v Speaker 1>people were still building, so I guess we'll see what

60
00:03:00.120 --> 00:03:04.039
<v Speaker 1>happens in the coming months, but yeah, I think we're

61
00:03:04.080 --> 00:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just kind of in this sideways choppy market right now

62
00:03:06.840 --> 00:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and time will tell what happens next.

63
00:03:09.360 --> 00:03:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I know the FED rate cuts are around the corner,

64
00:03:11.680 --> 00:03:14.240
<v Speaker 2>and that could be causing some anxiety as well, in

65
00:03:14.240 --> 00:03:16.759
<v Speaker 2>addition to the summer lull. Right, every they say sell

66
00:03:16.800 --> 00:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>and may go and go away, right, and then people

67
00:03:19.319 --> 00:03:22.560
<v Speaker 2>come back into the markets come late September. So do

68
00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:25.439
<v Speaker 2>you think the FED ray cuts is kind of adding

69
00:03:25.479 --> 00:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>some volatility here waiting to see what the job numbers

70
00:03:28.360 --> 00:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>may look like, and then maybe markets will then have

71
00:03:31.280 --> 00:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>confidence to you know, keep going.

72
00:03:34.360 --> 00:03:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that's my personal view, right, So I

73
00:03:37.719 --> 00:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just think one, a lot of the economic data is softening,

74
00:03:41.879 --> 00:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>pointing towards cuts are likely to happen, right, So I

75
00:03:45.719 --> 00:03:48.759
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see fifty BIPs most likely in September.

76
00:03:48.800 --> 00:03:50.919
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not a rage strategy or very trateg just

77
00:03:50.919 --> 00:03:53.479
<v Speaker 1>says at least twenty five, possibly fifty, which is roughly

78
00:03:53.479 --> 00:03:55.719
<v Speaker 1>what the market is pricing. Right. So we're priced now

79
00:03:55.800 --> 00:03:58.919
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred basis points or one percent cut before

80
00:03:58.919 --> 00:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, and then another or one

81
00:04:00.360 --> 00:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>percent cut before the end of twenty twenty five. That's

82
00:04:03.599 --> 00:04:06.719
<v Speaker 1>currently what markets are pricing. But you said sell a man,

83
00:04:06.800 --> 00:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>go away, and ironically that probably would have been pretty

84
00:04:09.080 --> 00:04:11.039
<v Speaker 1>good for crypto, but not for socks socks off. It's

85
00:04:11.039 --> 00:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>done I done pretty well. So it's not all risk

86
00:04:14.039 --> 00:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>assets that are that are fitting that this year.

87
00:04:17.319 --> 00:04:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure. So let's talk about ETFs. How have

88
00:04:21.160 --> 00:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the big one in ether ETFs have been reacting to

89
00:04:24.279 --> 00:04:28.160
<v Speaker 2>this type of environment. We've seen some outflows, although some

90
00:04:28.439 --> 00:04:31.480
<v Speaker 2>there was some inflows at certain points, so it's kind

91
00:04:31.480 --> 00:04:32.920
<v Speaker 2>of been up and down a bit.

92
00:04:34.120 --> 00:04:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, if you look at the Bitcoin ETFs,

93
00:04:37.319 --> 00:04:39.639
<v Speaker 1>i'd say it's it's been pretty damn good. I mean,

94
00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>their net inflows since they launched is over seventeen billion.

95
00:04:44.800 --> 00:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no matter how you slice it, that's with

96
00:04:46.600 --> 00:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen billion coming out of gray scales GBTC. Yeah, things

97
00:04:50.720 --> 00:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>have been somewhat slow recently, but it hasn't been that bad.

98
00:04:54.519 --> 00:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>There's kind of been this trickle that comes in and

99
00:04:56.639 --> 00:04:59.399
<v Speaker 1>then there's spurts of outflows and then there's another level

100
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of inflows come in and they more than cover the

101
00:05:01.800 --> 00:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>outflows that we just saw. And that's typically the way

102
00:05:04.360 --> 00:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that we see categories grow in the ETF world. Right

103
00:05:07.040 --> 00:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>like they're going to go up and down with prices

104
00:05:08.839 --> 00:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and money will come in and out. But theoretically, a

105
00:05:11.120 --> 00:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>real healthy market, you're going to see those asset levels

106
00:05:13.519 --> 00:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>and those flows over the long term tend to go up,

107
00:05:16.279 --> 00:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're seeing. We're not seeing that with ethereum.

108
00:05:20.079 --> 00:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So the Ethereum ETFs launched in July and they have

109
00:05:23.240 --> 00:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>had negative let me get you the exact number. They've

110
00:05:26.319 --> 00:05:28.879
<v Speaker 1>had negative, like almost five hundred million dollars in olflows.

111
00:05:28.879 --> 00:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Actually over five hundred million dollars in outflows. So with

112
00:05:32.399 --> 00:05:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin ETFs we had, we called them the newborn nine,

113
00:05:35.040 --> 00:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>these other spot ETFs besides GPTC that had enough demand

114
00:05:39.480 --> 00:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to overwhelm the outflows from the unlocking of the GBTC shares,

115
00:05:43.680 --> 00:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the gray scale GBTC shares. We are not seeing these

116
00:05:46.879 --> 00:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>other new eight ETFs or seven ETFs from the Ethereum

117
00:05:50.839 --> 00:05:54.519
<v Speaker 1>side of things to overwhelm the unlock and selling of

118
00:05:54.560 --> 00:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>shares of ETH. So we've seen net alflow since launched.

119
00:05:57.839 --> 00:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So we were relatively bare. So our our view was

120
00:06:01.399 --> 00:06:03.759
<v Speaker 1>like fifteen twenty percent was what we thought was going

121
00:06:03.839 --> 00:06:06.639
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Twenty percent was my number. Al chun Is,

122
00:06:06.680 --> 00:06:08.879
<v Speaker 1>my boss, thought fifteen percent of the flows that bitcoin

123
00:06:08.879 --> 00:06:11.079
<v Speaker 1>ETFs saw, we thought theorem metos would see over the

124
00:06:11.120 --> 00:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>first six to twelve months. I think I probably said

125
00:06:14.120 --> 00:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that on here Man I was there are nowhere near that.

126
00:06:18.839 --> 00:06:21.519
<v Speaker 1>So there's there's a few things we just talked about. Summerduldrums, right,

127
00:06:21.639 --> 00:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>sell them a go away. That's definitely been the case

128
00:06:24.040 --> 00:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>for Crypto. They launched into a very quiet, sideways shop

129
00:06:26.879 --> 00:06:28.759
<v Speaker 1>b market. There's just not a lot of interest in them.

130
00:06:29.199 --> 00:06:31.079
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of other things that go on here.

131
00:06:31.120 --> 00:06:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Like Bitcoin is kind of like if you're an advisor,

132
00:06:33.680 --> 00:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like bitcoin, digital store value, those things they just like

133
00:06:36.920 --> 00:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they make sense. They're very easy to sell, and if

134
00:06:39.480 --> 00:06:41.319
<v Speaker 1>you want to diversify it with like we call it

135
00:06:41.360 --> 00:06:43.879
<v Speaker 1>hot sauce in your portfolio, if you're already putting like

136
00:06:43.879 --> 00:06:45.759
<v Speaker 1>two percent of your client's money into bitcoin, do you

137
00:06:45.800 --> 00:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>need to diversify it with another digital asset. Maybe not.

138
00:06:48.879 --> 00:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's basically bitcoin first and then these other things

139
00:06:51.439 --> 00:06:53.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of need to fill out their own narrative. I've

140
00:06:53.759 --> 00:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>seen like these issuers and these trad five people that

141
00:06:57.079 --> 00:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>are trying to sell these ethereym metfs and ethereum in

142
00:06:59.079 --> 00:07:01.560
<v Speaker 1>general are working on different things. But like so I

143
00:07:01.560 --> 00:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>could say Matt Hogan for bitwise for example, likes to say,

144
00:07:04.120 --> 00:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like ethereum, you should be owning it and viewing it

145
00:07:07.399 --> 00:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>as like part of your tech exposure, like it almost

146
00:07:09.360 --> 00:07:10.879
<v Speaker 1>should be part of the queues in a way. That

147
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the argument that they're pushing. I just think there's

148
00:07:13.720 --> 00:07:16.079
<v Speaker 1>no one cohesive argument, so it's a little bit harder.

149
00:07:16.120 --> 00:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, ethereum is a lot more complex than bitcoin, right,

150
00:07:19.360 --> 00:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot more things you can do, so it's

151
00:07:21.040 --> 00:07:23.079
<v Speaker 1>a little more complicated. So for all those reasons, I

152
00:07:23.079 --> 00:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>mean Bitcoin ETF's really done really well, maybe one sideways

153
00:07:26.959 --> 00:07:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of months, but still holding up well.

154
00:07:29.240 --> 00:07:32.519
<v Speaker 1>Everything is there's been no issues Ethereum. Honestly, still no

155
00:07:32.639 --> 00:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>issues over there. You look at everything besides ETH, they've

156
00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:40.519
<v Speaker 1>taken in well over two billion dollars, so you know

157
00:07:40.600 --> 00:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at outflows, yes, but that's because two point

158
00:07:43.240 --> 00:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>six billion came out of grey scales ETH, but two

159
00:07:47.279 --> 00:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>point one roughly came in to the other products. So

160
00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:52.839
<v Speaker 1>they are doing well. They are pulling in money, it's

161
00:07:52.879 --> 00:07:55.519
<v Speaker 1>just not enough to offset the ETH outflows.

162
00:07:55.920 --> 00:07:58.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and like you said, like maybe the timing wasn't

163
00:07:58.439 --> 00:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>great given you know, we had headed in to summer

164
00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>and then you know, I'm thinking from a RIA standpoint,

165
00:08:05.560 --> 00:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>wealth manager standpoint, what you said, how much are you

166
00:08:08.160 --> 00:08:09.319
<v Speaker 2>going to throw at your clients?

167
00:08:09.399 --> 00:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Right?

168
00:08:10.040 --> 00:08:12.759
<v Speaker 2>You spend a lot of time pitching this new product Bitcoin.

169
00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:16.519
<v Speaker 2>It has the branding, it has the mass penetration, and

170
00:08:16.519 --> 00:08:19.399
<v Speaker 2>so forth. Etherom not so much. So if you go

171
00:08:19.519 --> 00:08:21.839
<v Speaker 2>to someone say, hey, there's also this thing called etherorem,

172
00:08:22.360 --> 00:08:24.000
<v Speaker 2>what's that? Why is it different?

173
00:08:24.040 --> 00:08:24.279
<v Speaker 1>And big?

174
00:08:24.519 --> 00:08:27.240
<v Speaker 2>You have to go through this whole explanation. So it's

175
00:08:27.240 --> 00:08:27.879
<v Speaker 2>a harder sell.

176
00:08:28.639 --> 00:08:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it really is a harder sell. And it's like,

177
00:08:31.279 --> 00:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who's like pretty well versed in this stuff,

178
00:08:34.799 --> 00:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of get it. So I honestly think

179
00:08:36.399 --> 00:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>like it would have probably been easier if they had

180
00:08:40.440 --> 00:08:42.759
<v Speaker 1>launched like later this year or early next year, because

181
00:08:42.960 --> 00:08:45.159
<v Speaker 1>you're also not only is it those reasons you just

182
00:08:45.159 --> 00:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about, you're also like they pick on ETFs just launched,

183
00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like people are just getting comfortable with these things, and

184
00:08:49.600 --> 00:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>then you're throwing another one at them right away. So

185
00:08:52.360 --> 00:08:56.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that all of that contributed to the lower

186
00:08:56.200 --> 00:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>demand we're seeing. That said, I also always expected that

187
00:09:00.279 --> 00:09:02.039
<v Speaker 1>the etherey metfs were going to be a bit of

188
00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a slower burn, if you will. Like I thought the

189
00:09:05.399 --> 00:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>type of level of demand that we could see maybe

190
00:09:08.080 --> 00:09:10.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent of the Bitcoin ETF flows, I thought

191
00:09:10.840 --> 00:09:13.399
<v Speaker 1>it might take a while to get there. And I

192
00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>thought the theory metfs could potentially get up to like

193
00:09:16.360 --> 00:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>their market cap rat show, which is like, I don't know,

194
00:09:18.559 --> 00:09:21.519
<v Speaker 1>thirty a third something like that over the longer term.

195
00:09:21.519 --> 00:09:22.879
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's going to be a slower burn

196
00:09:22.960 --> 00:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>for all those things we just talked about. I'm kind

197
00:09:25.720 --> 00:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of second guessing as so right now, I actually I've

198
00:09:28.279 --> 00:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>met with Steve mcclerk, who used to be one of

199
00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the guys running the Valkyrie ETFs. He has the under

200
00:09:34.360 --> 00:09:37.399
<v Speaker 1>on fifteen percent of the flows in six months versus

201
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin for ethereum, and I have the over and right

202
00:09:40.120 --> 00:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>now I am I'm going to owe him some food

203
00:09:42.279 --> 00:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>at Pubkey in New York City a few months from now.

204
00:09:47.320 --> 00:09:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, James, look what we were talking about

205
00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:54.679
<v Speaker 2>with the FED cut raycuts and maybe some additional liquidity

206
00:09:54.720 --> 00:09:57.519
<v Speaker 2>injections from Janet Yellen and things like that. As we

207
00:09:57.559 --> 00:10:00.559
<v Speaker 2>head into the elections, right we know these sitting incumbent

208
00:10:00.679 --> 00:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>wants to, you know, make things look good. The stock

209
00:10:04.120 --> 00:10:06.879
<v Speaker 2>marketing look good, the economy to look as best as possible.

210
00:10:07.240 --> 00:10:09.799
<v Speaker 2>So do you think we see some liquidity injections and

211
00:10:09.840 --> 00:10:13.759
<v Speaker 2>we are in much favorable environment where the inflows will increase?

212
00:10:13.759 --> 00:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Were both bigcoining ether coome Q four into twenty twenty five.

213
00:10:19.360 --> 00:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I mean, I do. I do think

214
00:10:22.679 --> 00:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>it will help. And but part of the problem here is, right, like,

215
00:10:26.000 --> 00:10:27.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this is going to depend on the

216
00:10:27.840 --> 00:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>political nature here. I know a lot of people will

217
00:10:29.720 --> 00:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>say it shouldn't really matter that much, but I really

218
00:10:31.720 --> 00:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>do think the political nature of what happens in November

219
00:10:34.600 --> 00:10:37.759
<v Speaker 1>will have an impact here. Obviously, ray cuts theoretically should

220
00:10:37.840 --> 00:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be beneficial to this market. There's no guarantee that that's

221
00:10:41.320 --> 00:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be the case, but theoretically that's what should happen.

222
00:10:44.919 --> 00:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But also we don't know exactly where somebody like Harris

223
00:10:48.919 --> 00:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>is going to stand, if they're going to follow like

224
00:10:50.639 --> 00:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the typical way that Biden has handled things. I tend

225
00:10:54.240 --> 00:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to think not. I think it will be neutral at worst,

226
00:10:56.840 --> 00:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like maybe slightly positive at best if the demsill win

227
00:10:59.879 --> 00:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in November, and I think it could be a very

228
00:11:02.519 --> 00:11:07.759
<v Speaker 1>positive catalyst if somebody like Trump wins.

229
00:11:09.720 --> 00:11:13.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, agreed, and I know it's very heated right now

230
00:11:13.320 --> 00:11:17.679
<v Speaker 2>from the political standpoint, and we'll see what happens. I

231
00:11:17.720 --> 00:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>did want to ask you about Solana. Is this Solana

232
00:11:21.200 --> 00:11:23.799
<v Speaker 2>ETF dead? Is it officiated? We had some filers, but

233
00:11:23.840 --> 00:11:24.360
<v Speaker 2>what do you think?

234
00:11:25.320 --> 00:11:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So essentially what happened here is so for I've

235
00:11:30.559 --> 00:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely talked about this on your show before. So for

236
00:11:32.120 --> 00:11:34.279
<v Speaker 1>an ETF to launch, you need to basically approval from

237
00:11:34.279 --> 00:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>two parts of the SEC, and you need two like

238
00:11:37.159 --> 00:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>things that happened at once. The first thing is the

239
00:11:39.039 --> 00:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>issuers have to file their prospectuses or s ones and

240
00:11:42.039 --> 00:11:44.399
<v Speaker 1>they go through the Division of Corporate Finance eventually to

241
00:11:44.399 --> 00:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>get approved. So that's one division of the SEC. But

242
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>typically before they would approve those to Corporate Finance, you

243
00:11:49.759 --> 00:11:52.039
<v Speaker 1>also have to get these those nineteen befores which we've

244
00:11:52.080 --> 00:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about a lot, right and CBOE filed nineteen before

245
00:11:56.399 --> 00:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of ARC or sorry not on behalf of PARC,

246
00:12:00.080 --> 00:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>half of twenty one Chaares and on behalf of van K.

247
00:12:03.159 --> 00:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Those filings went through, but they have since withdrawn them.

248
00:12:06.480 --> 00:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Essentially either the SEC refused to acknowledge them told them

249
00:12:09.200 --> 00:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to withdraw. Basically said this isn't happening, which isn't all

250
00:12:12.639 --> 00:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that surprising. I mean, if you look at some of

251
00:12:14.240 --> 00:12:18.639
<v Speaker 1>little lawsuits out there against Coinbase, Bracken, you name it,

252
00:12:18.679 --> 00:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they basically flat out calls all hot A security and

253
00:12:21.360 --> 00:12:23.799
<v Speaker 1>say they're not going to mess with that thing. So

254
00:12:23.919 --> 00:12:26.519
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen is CBE has withdrawn. So for now

255
00:12:26.600 --> 00:12:28.799
<v Speaker 1>it's dead in the order. Until we see another ninety

256
00:12:28.799 --> 00:12:32.279
<v Speaker 1>before filing, nothing can happen. That said, twenty one chairs

257
00:12:32.320 --> 00:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>and van X still have those s ones out there,

258
00:12:34.559 --> 00:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>so they're still filed. They're still technically active. They just

259
00:12:37.360 --> 00:12:39.639
<v Speaker 1>need to go through that nineteen before process before they

260
00:12:39.679 --> 00:12:43.879
<v Speaker 1>can get approved by the corporate finance. So are they

261
00:12:43.879 --> 00:12:46.519
<v Speaker 1>dead kind of? I think again this goes back to

262
00:12:46.559 --> 00:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>what I was just saying with the political process. I

263
00:12:48.360 --> 00:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think if we see Trump in office, it's possible that

264
00:12:51.559 --> 00:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>actually I would say it's it's highly likely we would

265
00:12:54.000 --> 00:12:56.919
<v Speaker 1>see another filing because the people would hope that somebody

266
00:12:56.960 --> 00:12:59.639
<v Speaker 1>else would be running the SEC, so there could be

267
00:12:59.679 --> 00:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a chain and the way the ADMIN is handling this stuff.

268
00:13:02.000 --> 00:13:08.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think that could come down to the presidential election.

269
00:13:08.840 --> 00:13:10.919
<v Speaker 1>But also you kind of need a bunch of other things, right,

270
00:13:10.960 --> 00:13:12.799
<v Speaker 1>like right now you have the CFTC and the SEC

271
00:13:12.919 --> 00:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>arguing over jurisdiction. You have the SEC calling this thing

272
00:13:16.480 --> 00:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>these things salon as specifically a security, CFTC is saying

273
00:13:20.360 --> 00:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not. And then so like you don't know who

274
00:13:22.639 --> 00:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>has control over what. You don't know what exactly is

275
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:27.279
<v Speaker 1>a security or what is a commodity. So you kind

276
00:13:27.279 --> 00:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of need that cleared up. Whether that's in the case

277
00:13:29.240 --> 00:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of kind of similar to like what Ripple has gone through,

278
00:13:31.240 --> 00:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got like some at least a little bit of

279
00:13:34.039 --> 00:13:37.759
<v Speaker 1>like binding clarity from the courts. You might need something

280
00:13:37.799 --> 00:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like that, or more likely, I think what you need

281
00:13:40.320 --> 00:13:42.519
<v Speaker 1>is a literal like Act of Congress to kind of

282
00:13:42.519 --> 00:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>clear all this stuff up for some things other than

283
00:13:45.120 --> 00:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and ethereum to get through. I mean, the way

284
00:13:48.519 --> 00:13:50.399
<v Speaker 1>right now it's set up is you need a futures

285
00:13:50.399 --> 00:13:53.559
<v Speaker 1>market that's regulated and surveilled and the CFTC feels comfortable

286
00:13:53.600 --> 00:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>with it, and the SEC will allow it, and you

287
00:13:55.600 --> 00:13:57.759
<v Speaker 1>can kind of use that to get a spot etf

288
00:13:57.759 --> 00:13:59.399
<v Speaker 1>That's what we had with bitcoin, that's what we have

289
00:13:59.480 --> 00:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with ethereum. We don't have any other markets for any

290
00:14:02.279 --> 00:14:05.759
<v Speaker 1>other digital assets that could go through that same process,

291
00:14:05.840 --> 00:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>right so you kind of need some other thing out

292
00:14:08.559 --> 00:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there to happen for these things to get approved. That said,

293
00:14:11.759 --> 00:14:15.519
<v Speaker 1>there is nothing like in the SEC regulation that says

294
00:14:15.559 --> 00:14:17.879
<v Speaker 1>like you need a futures market that is surveiled for

295
00:14:17.919 --> 00:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>all these things. That's just kind of the process that

296
00:14:19.799 --> 00:14:22.639
<v Speaker 1>this SEC has followed and what they wanted. It's not

297
00:14:22.720 --> 00:14:25.279
<v Speaker 1>like that's hard coded into any law or language or anything.

298
00:14:25.320 --> 00:14:26.639
<v Speaker 1>That's why I said, if we get a change in

299
00:14:26.639 --> 00:14:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the admin at the SEC, then that could also change.

300
00:14:29.279 --> 00:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>But there's a few other you need catalysts one of

301
00:14:32.000 --> 00:14:34.639
<v Speaker 1>those three or four things I just mentioned to happen

302
00:14:34.679 --> 00:14:37.159
<v Speaker 1>before you can get something like a Salona or possibly

303
00:14:37.240 --> 00:14:38.919
<v Speaker 1>even a ripple ETF.

304
00:14:39.679 --> 00:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, great point, And most likely we'll see what the

305
00:14:43.559 --> 00:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>landscape looks like in twenty twenty five, because twenty twenty

306
00:14:46.120 --> 00:14:50.320
<v Speaker 2>four it's done right Lane ducks coming up campaigning and

307
00:14:50.720 --> 00:14:53.600
<v Speaker 2>gants are still there, so we got to wait to see,

308
00:14:53.639 --> 00:14:56.879
<v Speaker 2>like is there a regime change, and under Trump it

309
00:14:56.919 --> 00:15:00.879
<v Speaker 2>will be more pro crypto, So Bringers, it'd be nice

310
00:15:00.879 --> 00:15:03.720
<v Speaker 2>to have Solana maybe an ex r p ETF in

311
00:15:03.759 --> 00:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. But then it goes back to what

312
00:15:06.039 --> 00:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>we were talking about earlier. Would it be too saturated

313
00:15:09.440 --> 00:15:12.919
<v Speaker 2>for the masses, right, They get confused, Why do I

314
00:15:12.960 --> 00:15:16.000
<v Speaker 2>need to invest in Solana? Isn't the ethereum the same thing?

315
00:15:16.159 --> 00:15:18.639
<v Speaker 2>Let me just handle big, Let me just have some bigcoin, right.

316
00:15:18.799 --> 00:15:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, the one thing I would say is

317
00:15:20.519 --> 00:15:23.919
<v Speaker 1>that like the Selani, there's Salon ETFs elsewhere, right, Like, yeah,

318
00:15:23.919 --> 00:15:25.519
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a US, but we have them in Europe,

319
00:15:25.519 --> 00:15:27.559
<v Speaker 1>and there's a couple of billion dollars over there in

320
00:15:27.600 --> 00:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>those ETFs, so they're they're big business. I think a

321
00:15:30.080 --> 00:15:31.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of that has to do with money came in

322
00:15:31.600 --> 00:15:35.159
<v Speaker 1>when when Solana was like in single digit prices, so

323
00:15:35.200 --> 00:15:36.679
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of money that was in there,

324
00:15:37.480 --> 00:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and then so you don't need that much to be

325
00:15:40.159 --> 00:15:41.759
<v Speaker 1>in there, a few million dollars for it to get

326
00:15:41.759 --> 00:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to the level it has when the price has gone

327
00:15:43.519 --> 00:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>up like I don't know, twenty x or whatever it is.

328
00:15:45.639 --> 00:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that also played a role. But it's

329
00:15:49.240 --> 00:15:53.519
<v Speaker 1>still there's there's a lot of dctfs elsewhere, just not

330
00:15:53.639 --> 00:15:57.279
<v Speaker 1>here in the States, so there will be demand. But

331
00:15:57.320 --> 00:15:59.919
<v Speaker 1>like you said, I just think right now, as things

332
00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:02.879
<v Speaker 1>certainly look, it's kind of bitcoin first, and then everything

333
00:16:02.919 --> 00:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>else will be slower burn or just maybe not garner

334
00:16:06.960 --> 00:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>as much interest from the trad FI world, at least

335
00:16:10.159 --> 00:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in the near term.

336
00:16:12.039 --> 00:16:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, I wanted to ask you about bit Wise Asset

337
00:16:14.279 --> 00:16:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Management and their acquisitions. First was etc Group and then

338
00:16:18.120 --> 00:16:22.480
<v Speaker 2>they I believe, Osprey and Emerge the funds accordingly. So

339
00:16:22.519 --> 00:16:24.799
<v Speaker 2>this is this is pretty big. It looks like they're

340
00:16:24.799 --> 00:16:27.799
<v Speaker 2>trying to grow their market share, expand as much as possible.

341
00:16:28.159 --> 00:16:29.679
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about these acquisitions?

342
00:16:30.240 --> 00:16:32.679
<v Speaker 1>I love them, honestly. I mean there's been this huge

343
00:16:34.080 --> 00:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>There's always been a lot of consolidation in the ascimnage

344
00:16:36.720 --> 00:16:39.879
<v Speaker 1>industry around ETF. So for many, many years it has

345
00:16:39.960 --> 00:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of like large legacy asset managers buying

346
00:16:43.919 --> 00:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ETF issuers who know the ETF market and how to

347
00:16:46.600 --> 00:16:49.039
<v Speaker 1>do it, and basically then launching their own products with

348
00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the IP that they get from those products. So that

349
00:16:51.480 --> 00:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been going on for over a decade. And now

350
00:16:53.480 --> 00:16:56.519
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot more consolidation where like these bigger

351
00:16:56.559 --> 00:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>etf issuers in the US are buying smaller shops elsewhere

352
00:17:00.039 --> 00:17:03.519
<v Speaker 1>where in the world, whether they're European specialists or even

353
00:17:03.519 --> 00:17:05.759
<v Speaker 1>in Asia. So in the case of there's actually some

354
00:17:05.759 --> 00:17:08.319
<v Speaker 1>some asset managers in Asia that have bought big US

355
00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:11.319
<v Speaker 1>issuers to kind of drum up the interest there. So

356
00:17:11.680 --> 00:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been just an overwhelming trend that we've seen over

357
00:17:14.480 --> 00:17:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the last few years, and it's picking up and I

358
00:17:16.759 --> 00:17:19.519
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good thing. It's basically bit wise sees

359
00:17:19.599 --> 00:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>them they bought etc Group. They have a bunch of

360
00:17:22.400 --> 00:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ETFs in Europe, particularly particularly holding crypto asseids, so there's

361
00:17:28.000 --> 00:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>probably a lot of overlap they can do there. I mean,

362
00:17:30.920 --> 00:17:33.839
<v Speaker 1>for example, they own now a Salona ETF in Europe,

363
00:17:33.880 --> 00:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>so twenty one shares. Who's another issuer the one that

364
00:17:35.920 --> 00:17:37.799
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about who also filed with van K,

365
00:17:38.359 --> 00:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>They have some some ETFs. They they have the largest

366
00:17:41.119 --> 00:17:43.599
<v Speaker 1>salon of ETF in Europe. And you have van K

367
00:17:43.680 --> 00:17:46.759
<v Speaker 1>also who has etns or etcs wherever you want to

368
00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>call them in Europe that hold these things. So there's

369
00:17:48.920 --> 00:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>plenty of experience over there already with dealing with these

370
00:17:51.759 --> 00:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>types of products. And then OBTC is unique. I think.

371
00:17:55.039 --> 00:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So obtc's structure was similar to those gray scale trusts

372
00:17:59.240 --> 00:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>where they were kind of closed ended. You can come in,

373
00:18:01.000 --> 00:18:03.319
<v Speaker 1>but you couldn't really leave unless but you had you

374
00:18:03.359 --> 00:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>could sell your shares, you can redeem them. So theoretically,

375
00:18:05.680 --> 00:18:07.279
<v Speaker 1>if it was trading at a massive discount, you just

376
00:18:07.319 --> 00:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>had to sell at a discount if you wanted to sell,

377
00:18:09.799 --> 00:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and these things were trading a bit of a discount.

378
00:18:12.359 --> 00:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people thought that Osprey was going to

379
00:18:14.480 --> 00:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>go through the same process that Gray Skill did and

380
00:18:16.720 --> 00:18:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, convert this thing to an outright ETF But

381
00:18:19.880 --> 00:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I think this was probably the best case scenario for

382
00:18:22.160 --> 00:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone involved. I mean, doing that is very expensive. They

383
00:18:25.240 --> 00:18:27.519
<v Speaker 1>only had one hundred and thirty million dollars in assets,

384
00:18:27.519 --> 00:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, so it's not like it was a huge

385
00:18:29.000 --> 00:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>cash cow. And this way, those those holders of OBTC

386
00:18:34.279 --> 00:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>are basically just going to get bit wise as bit

387
00:18:37.480 --> 00:18:40.279
<v Speaker 1>B shares in return of equivalent value. So all of

388
00:18:40.279 --> 00:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a sudden you get out, you're no longer a discount,

389
00:18:42.680 --> 00:18:44.599
<v Speaker 1>and you still have this coached pitcoin. It's a non

390
00:18:44.640 --> 00:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>taxable event. So and then also Osprey doesn't have to

391
00:18:48.640 --> 00:18:51.279
<v Speaker 1>spend a bunch of time, effort, energy, money, you name it,

392
00:18:51.759 --> 00:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>going through and converting this thing into an extremely competitive

393
00:18:55.039 --> 00:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>market where fees are twenty BIPs and lower. And there's

394
00:18:59.000 --> 00:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>already you know, wealked about this ten to eleven products

395
00:19:01.400 --> 00:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that hold spot bitcoin, like Osprey just launching and converting OPDC,

396
00:19:05.759 --> 00:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it'd be hard to like compete there, So I think

397
00:19:08.720 --> 00:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>just makes sense for everyone. And like you said, bit

398
00:19:11.759 --> 00:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>wise is growing its asset base. It now holds it

399
00:19:15.240 --> 00:19:17.319
<v Speaker 1>now owns that one hundred and thirty million. I don't

400
00:19:17.359 --> 00:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>know what they paid for it, but they have those

401
00:19:20.039 --> 00:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>assets now inside or they will have those assets in BitB.

402
00:19:25.519 --> 00:19:28.519
<v Speaker 2>Tough question for you. Does this move put them ahead

403
00:19:28.519 --> 00:19:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of any of the folks they were behind in the

404
00:19:32.480 --> 00:19:33.880
<v Speaker 2>market capitalist so to speak.

405
00:19:35.359 --> 00:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you in a second. So bit B

406
00:19:37.640 --> 00:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they have right now they have two point two two

407
00:19:40.960 --> 00:19:44.279
<v Speaker 1>point one billion dollars and they're just behind ARC and

408
00:19:44.319 --> 00:19:47.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty one shares, and then you obviously have Fidelity at

409
00:19:47.880 --> 00:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>ten point two, and then you have I shares at

410
00:19:51.759 --> 00:19:54.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty point seven. So they're over twenty billion, and GPDC

411
00:19:55.160 --> 00:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>is down at thirteen point three. So they didn't jump anyone.

412
00:19:58.640 --> 00:20:01.759
<v Speaker 1>It extends their lead over the mini trust. So we

413
00:20:01.759 --> 00:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't really talk about this too much, but Grey scales

414
00:20:04.039 --> 00:20:06.839
<v Speaker 1>unique process of spinning out and mini trust at a

415
00:20:06.880 --> 00:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>much lower fee. Now that product ticker BTC has nineteen

416
00:20:11.559 --> 00:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>or one point nine billion in assets. So, I mean

417
00:20:13.920 --> 00:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the other thing we I should mention here is like

418
00:20:16.279 --> 00:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone talks about these things, they're looking at it, but

419
00:20:18.559 --> 00:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>like all of these ETFs are extremely successful. I mean

420
00:20:21.480 --> 00:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>most ETF fishers, they get one product that could have

421
00:20:24.799 --> 00:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred million dollars in assets, they view it

422
00:20:26.920 --> 00:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>as an extreme success. And all of these guys have

423
00:20:29.519 --> 00:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>gotten there within eight months, not even so it's been

424
00:20:34.720 --> 00:20:37.079
<v Speaker 1>an absolute smashing success. But now, I mean, also, it's

425
00:20:37.079 --> 00:20:39.079
<v Speaker 1>only one hundred and thirty mil, so I mean, obviously

426
00:20:39.160 --> 00:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of money, but it's not a huge

427
00:20:40.960 --> 00:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>deal in the type of numbers that we're talking about,

428
00:20:43.240 --> 00:20:46.279
<v Speaker 1>but it will be beneficial. It'll probably get them much

429
00:20:46.279 --> 00:20:53.279
<v Speaker 1>closer on the once it's fully complete too. ARCB ticker RB.

430
00:20:54.359 --> 00:20:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's pretty amazing. I think it's important for us

431
00:20:57.400 --> 00:21:01.079
<v Speaker 2>to have perspective. Like you said, traditional said to ETFs,

432
00:21:01.519 --> 00:21:04.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, to have one hundred million would be successful.

433
00:21:04.960 --> 00:21:08.319
<v Speaker 2>We're talking black Rock having twenty billion. I mean, it's

434
00:21:08.359 --> 00:21:11.200
<v Speaker 2>incredible in just months. It's wild.

435
00:21:11.480 --> 00:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're very close to twenty one. They're at twenty

436
00:21:13.359 --> 00:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>point seven, they're over twenty point seven, so wow, Yeah,

437
00:21:17.240 --> 00:21:20.519
<v Speaker 1>very very close to the fame Bitcoin number.

438
00:21:21.720 --> 00:21:25.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, final item here. We got news yesterday from the

439
00:21:25.359 --> 00:21:29.960
<v Speaker 2>FBI that North Korean hackers are supposedly targeting crypto ETFs

440
00:21:30.319 --> 00:21:33.599
<v Speaker 2>and they're targeting I think the custodians from the mistaken

441
00:21:33.759 --> 00:21:37.559
<v Speaker 2>which would be primarily Coinbase. What are your thoughts on this,

442
00:21:37.680 --> 00:21:41.000
<v Speaker 2>And it seems just in principle we need some diversification

443
00:21:41.119 --> 00:21:42.680
<v Speaker 2>of custody here, right.

444
00:21:43.160 --> 00:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, honestly, I do think that's the one thing where

445
00:21:45.440 --> 00:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm fully on board. I think there needs to be

446
00:21:47.200 --> 00:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>some diversification of the custody of these things. For the

447
00:21:49.720 --> 00:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>most I think it will happen. It's going to happen

448
00:21:51.440 --> 00:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>over time. Some of these issuers are gonna stick with

449
00:21:53.640 --> 00:21:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Coinbase as their sole custodian. Obviously, there hasn't been any

450
00:21:57.640 --> 00:22:02.559
<v Speaker 1>issues really yet. I think it's highly unlikely that it's

451
00:22:02.559 --> 00:22:05.599
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen, but I would never say never. But also,

452
00:22:06.039 --> 00:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>isn't that surprising considering like I feel like every other

453
00:22:10.400 --> 00:22:13.039
<v Speaker 1>month I hear about the Lazarus Group or or North

454
00:22:13.119 --> 00:22:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Korea hackers like getting on board on some like project

455
00:22:16.799 --> 00:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and then siphoning away assets and things like that. So

456
00:22:19.920 --> 00:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising at all that they would target like

457
00:22:22.279 --> 00:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>what is I don't know, it's the biggest honeypot of

458
00:22:24.599 --> 00:22:27.079
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin in the world. If you're gonna, if you're gonna

459
00:22:27.079 --> 00:22:29.519
<v Speaker 1>go look at how much how much bitcoin the coin

460
00:22:29.519 --> 00:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>base holds. I don't know what the exact number is,

461
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's it's an absolutely stupid number. M M.

462
00:22:34.839 --> 00:22:37.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I'm hoping we don't have any issues like that

463
00:22:37.920 --> 00:22:40.839
<v Speaker 2>because that would be so detrimental to the market by

464
00:22:40.960 --> 00:22:43.920
<v Speaker 2>no coinbase. They do have uh, you know, Tier one

465
00:22:44.039 --> 00:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>security and services and so forth. But I think, like

466
00:22:47.160 --> 00:22:49.400
<v Speaker 2>I said, just out of principle, we need some diversification

467
00:22:49.480 --> 00:22:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and maybe you know, Congress and they can get this

468
00:22:54.039 --> 00:22:56.839
<v Speaker 2>SAB one two one situation figured out with the SEC

469
00:22:56.960 --> 00:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and maybe b N Y Melon and somebody, these banks

470
00:22:59.440 --> 00:23:03.200
<v Speaker 2>can come in and take some of that custodies over.

471
00:23:03.480 --> 00:23:05.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Hey, I mean all those banks, they

472
00:23:05.720 --> 00:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they're trying, they want to be able to do this

473
00:23:07.480 --> 00:23:09.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we've heard rumors that there is going to

474
00:23:09.440 --> 00:23:11.759
<v Speaker 1>be exceptions to say and twenty one and they will

475
00:23:11.799 --> 00:23:14.519
<v Speaker 1>come into the space and compete. So time will tell.

476
00:23:14.559 --> 00:23:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you also have you have Bicco and Gemini

477
00:23:16.839 --> 00:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that are already here. So Gemini has plenty of it

478
00:23:19.640 --> 00:23:21.839
<v Speaker 1>has a bunch of products that use them as custodians

479
00:23:21.680 --> 00:23:25.599
<v Speaker 1>in Canada and elsewhere. Vanak uses them as a custodian

480
00:23:25.640 --> 00:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>on their etf hold Will and then obviously bicco Is

481
00:23:29.240 --> 00:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is trying to get into space as well. So I

482
00:23:30.720 --> 00:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>think we'll see more of these issuers, you know, split

483
00:23:34.000 --> 00:23:36.599
<v Speaker 1>up who they use. I mean, Fidelity uses their own

484
00:23:36.640 --> 00:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>custodial service, so I assume they're just going to stick

485
00:23:39.000 --> 00:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>with their own custodial service. I think black Rock is

486
00:23:41.759 --> 00:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>likely just going to stick with their partner and coinbase,

487
00:23:44.000 --> 00:23:46.759
<v Speaker 1>and they have some that their partnership going on. But

488
00:23:46.799 --> 00:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I think some of these other issuers, I think I

489
00:23:49.400 --> 00:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>would not be surprised at all to see them, you know,

490
00:23:52.039 --> 00:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>diversify and use some of these other you know, the

491
00:23:54.480 --> 00:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>current ones, the biccos of the world or like you said,

492
00:23:56.880 --> 00:23:59.599
<v Speaker 1>b and Y, Melon State treet gets into space, any

493
00:23:59.599 --> 00:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of these other are like traditional qualified custodians. If they

494
00:24:03.079 --> 00:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>enter the space, I think we'll see it, We'll see

495
00:24:05.759 --> 00:24:06.079
<v Speaker 1>it happen.

496
00:24:07.319 --> 00:24:10.240
<v Speaker 2>James, always great insights, my friend. Thank you so much.

497
00:24:11.119 --> 00:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thanks for having me, Tony. This is great
