Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Well, good morning, and welcome to the show today. I
Speaker 2: will be your host for the David Knight Show today.
Speaker 2: As you can tell, I am not David Night. I'm
Speaker 2: his son, Travis Knight. And the studio setup is a
Speaker 2: bit different today. That is because I am broadcasting all
Speaker 2: on my own solo, so it's a little bit different
Speaker 2: and hopefully things go smoothly. I will be doing my
Speaker 2: best and we'll see how it goes from there. Well,
Speaker 2: we have a lot to cover today. I would like
Speaker 2: to start with this article here. This is from Futurism.
Speaker 2: Does Open Ay board member resigns after deep connections to
Speaker 2: Epstein exposed? And I think an interesting thing about this
Speaker 2: article is it exposes how far reaching Epstein's web was.
Speaker 2: He wasn't just interested in politicians. This guy was involved
Speaker 2: with politics, but he was also he was all over
Speaker 2: the place. And of course this is Larry Summers and
Speaker 2: this article is on futurism. If you give me just
Speaker 2: a second, I'll be able to pull it up for you.
Speaker 2: Let's get that set up for you. But right now,
Speaker 2: i'd like to wish you all a good morning. Lets
Speaker 2: you know that my dad is doing fine. He just
Speaker 2: needs a break with everything that's happened with my uncle.
Speaker 2: He just needs some time off and he will be
Speaker 2: back soon, so don't worry. David is fine. And here
Speaker 2: we can see this article the David Night Show and
Speaker 2: it is on futurism. See the title there. Open AYE
Speaker 2: board member resigns after deep connections to Epstein exposed. Isn't
Speaker 2: that wonderful? And you have to imagine the poor woman
Speaker 2: that had to deal with this man. It is truly horrifying.
Speaker 2: Faulting release of thousands of deceased sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein's
Speaker 2: emails by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Form.
Speaker 2: It came to light that Larry Summers, former US Treasury
Speaker 2: Secretary and Harvard economist, was deeply involved in the arch
Speaker 2: pedophiles affairs. But Summers isn't just a top level economist.
Speaker 2: He's also a shareholder in the massive ai company open Ai,
Speaker 2: creator of chat, GPT, and Sora. His web was everywhere.
Speaker 2: It's not just politicians, it is people like Larry Summers
Speaker 2: that are involved in open Ai, Chat, GPT, Sora. Unlike
Speaker 2: other problematic open Ai investor Summers is a top dog
Speaker 2: at open ai, building it spawn on the board of directors,
Speaker 2: at least he used to. Earlier today, Summers announced he
Speaker 2: was stepping down from his role with the company. At
Speaker 2: least he's got. I guess some shame unlike other people,
Speaker 2: in line with my announcement to step away from my
Speaker 2: public commitments, I've also decided to resign from the board
Speaker 2: of open Ai, he told the company in a statement.
Speaker 2: I'm grateful for the opportunity to have served, excited about
Speaker 2: the potential of the company, and look forward to following
Speaker 2: their progress. Apparently I'm getting an echo for some reason,
Speaker 2: but we'll figure it out and move on. Summers isn't
Speaker 2: any old open ai investor, and he likewise wasn't merely
Speaker 2: an acquaintance to Epstein, and one twenty eighteen email, Epstein
Speaker 2: described himself as summers wingman. What a nice friend Jeffrey
Speaker 2: Epstein is was to this man. The contact was somehow
Speaker 2: even worse, as a student newspaper, The Harvard Crimson reported,
Speaker 2: because the economist was asking Epstein for advice as he
Speaker 2: pursued a relationship with someone he was mentoring despite having
Speaker 2: been married since two thousand and five in a staggeringly
Speaker 2: unethical breach of academic norms. Let's see hopefully that fixes
Speaker 2: the issue with the doubled audio. We'll find out. As
Speaker 2: Summers spreaded that the woman he was teaching value his
Speaker 2: professional insights more than his personal acumen, Epstein told him
Speaker 2: she is doomed to be with you, and looking at
Speaker 2: Larry Summers, I imagine that would be considered doom, perhaps
Speaker 2: a fate worse than death. Think for now, I'm going
Speaker 2: nowhere with her except economics mentor. Summers told Epstein at
Speaker 2: the time, this is well, I have great regrets in
Speaker 2: my life. Somemer's told the crimsoners statement. As I have
Speaker 2: said before, my association with Jeffrey Epstein was a major
Speaker 2: error of judgment. A major error of judgment is a
Speaker 2: very mild way to say this. He's underselling it a
Speaker 2: little bit, isn't he. It was an error in judgment,
Speaker 2: me being a so shaded with this known sex trafficking
Speaker 2: potential pedophile, in my opinion, almost definite pedophile. You don't
Speaker 2: want to split hairs about the a FIBA file nonsense
Speaker 2: that people continually want to And there is the audio again.
Speaker 2: It is driving me to distraction. But that is our
Speaker 2: first article for the day, and as I said, it
Speaker 2: shows that he is Epstein's web is not just involved
Speaker 2: with politics. It stretches and spans across multiple avenues. He
Speaker 2: was involved with all kinds of different things, and that
Speaker 2: is something that we need to remember. It's not just politics.
Speaker 2: These guys are everywhere. Are higher echelons in just about
Speaker 2: every single aspect of our lives are run by these people.
Speaker 2: They have infiltrated every Let's see, let's check what comments
Speaker 2: we have going on. I'll be trying to monitor comments
Speaker 2: as we go. I see you all in chat on Rumble.
Speaker 2: I appreciate you being here today. It is a pleasure
Speaker 2: to be hosting the show. And as I said, David
Speaker 2: is fine. He just needs a little time off right now.
Speaker 2: It's been stressful and hard on our family. But please
Speaker 2: just keep us in your prayers. David will be back
Speaker 2: not tomorrow. Guard is hosting the show tomorrow, and again
Speaker 2: that is Guard Goldsmith of Liberty Conspiracy. You can find
Speaker 2: him on Rumble and Twitter. But as I'm getting my
Speaker 2: bearings here with this new setup, let's move right along.
Speaker 2: This is another article that I thought was interesting, and
Speaker 2: this one is more just a bit strange. This is
Speaker 2: also on futurism. Man cryogenically frees' wife gets new girlfriend
Speaker 2: in the meantime. You can tell he doesn't really believe.
Speaker 3: He's not.
Speaker 2: He's not a true believer in the technology. He's hedging
Speaker 2: his bets like, well, you know, sure, maybe she'll come
Speaker 2: back one day, but I need a little I need
Speaker 2: love in the meantime. Except it's not about love for
Speaker 2: this guy. The Chinese man cryogenically prosed his forty nine
Speaker 2: year old wife after she died from lung cancer in
Speaker 2: twenty seventeen, but in spite of the implicit promise that
Speaker 2: he was waiting for future technology to bring her back
Speaker 2: to life, now he's ready to move on. As a
Speaker 2: BBC reports, Gway, Xun Min revealed in a recent interview
Speaker 2: that he's been dating somebody else since twenty twenty, sparking
Speaker 2: a heated debate on social media in China. Junman's wife
Speaker 2: Zhan when Leon became China's first cryogenically preserved person, with
Speaker 2: Jun Min signing a thirty year agreement with the shang
Speaker 2: Dong Yinfang Life Science Reshirt Research Institute to keep her
Speaker 2: on ice we need. The South China Morning Posts first
Speaker 2: teamed up with the Shandong University in twenty fifteen, offering
Speaker 2: free procedures to early volunteers. That's right, if you get
Speaker 2: in early, they will freeze you for eternity on the chief.
Speaker 3: I guess even isn't that nice.
Speaker 2: They'll turn you into a popsicle and you won't even
Speaker 2: have to pay for it. Despite his hopes of one
Speaker 2: day thowing her remains, also have to say, I wouldn't
Speaker 2: trust any company, but especially not in China, to actually
Speaker 2: keep my body the way they say they're going to. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 2: give us that thirty year timeline. Come back and check
Speaker 2: on her in thirty years and you find out that
Speaker 2: they've parted her out, cut her up.
Speaker 3: I'm not accusing this company.
Speaker 2: I'm just saying I wouldn't trust any company at all
Speaker 2: not to engage in some illicit affairs. Despite his hopes
Speaker 2: of one day thowing her remains after being submerged in
Speaker 2: two thousand liters of liquid nitrogen to allow her to
Speaker 2: live once more, there's still no scientific evidence that cry
Speaker 2: jankly preserved bodies could ever be resurrected. And of course,
Speaker 2: if you're a Christian, you understand that they cannot be
Speaker 2: because the soul is not a physical thing. Once the
Speaker 2: soul has departed, the flesh is dead. There's no bringing
Speaker 2: it back. It is simply a husk. The life is gone.
Speaker 2: According to estimates, there are around six hundred people who
Speaker 2: have been cry out preserved, but whether any of them
Speaker 2: will have the chance to tell the tale is anything
Speaker 2: but certain. All these people desperate, so desperate to avoid death,
Speaker 2: they'll do anything. They'll grasp at the faintest hope, just
Speaker 2: anything to give them a glimmer that maybe it's not
Speaker 2: the end. And of course we know it is not
Speaker 2: the end, but these people are desperate for something else.
Speaker 2: That reality hasn't stopped a cottage industry of companies across
Speaker 2: the globe from offering service do rapidly cool down the
Speaker 2: bodies of the recently deceased, with the hopes of a
Speaker 2: future technological revolution that will somehow allow them to be
Speaker 2: brought back to life somehow. They haven't quite figured it
Speaker 2: out yet. They're working on it. They'll get back to you.
Speaker 3: But if you want to.
Speaker 2: Pay them right now, right now for the service, you know,
Speaker 2: if it happens, you can get in on that I
Speaker 2: suppose maybe they'll give you a discount. Despite starting to date,
Speaker 2: Despite showing a date following his late wife's crowd jenk procedure,
Speaker 2: Junman claimed he hasn't given up his deceased partner, saying
Speaker 2: that Wang hasn't entered my heart yet. Well that's great.
Speaker 2: You've got to imagine it's a bit galling to be
Speaker 2: the other woman in this scenario. Well, you know, I
Speaker 2: love you, honey, but just not as much as my dead,
Speaker 2: frozen wife that I keep in a vat of liquid nitrogen.
Speaker 2: Complicating the bizarre love triangles the fact that Junman is
Speaker 2: now relying on Wang to walk after undergoing coronary stint surgery.
Speaker 2: She can never replace my wife, he told Southern Weekly.
Speaker 2: I cannot just forget the past, but I still need
Speaker 2: to move on with life. That is into her outrage,
Speaker 2: arguing Junman was wrong to move on. Guy might seem
Speaker 2: deeply devoted, but in reality this is emotional detachment. One
Speaker 2: person wrote in a social media post, as quoted by
Speaker 2: the sc MP South China Morning post, is so called
Speaker 2: love for Zohn is more like an obsession with playing
Speaker 2: the role of the grieving husband, just like get how
Speaker 2: cold and distant. He appears with his current partner speaking
Speaker 2: of cold and distant. Well, that's again, this is the
Speaker 2: future they are desperate for. We're going to solve our problems.
Speaker 2: Will freeze you, and when we figure it out, we'll
Speaker 2: pop you back in. It'll be wonderful. You'll wake to
Speaker 2: a utopia. Except they'll never get it. It's never going
Speaker 2: to happen. Another part of this article is that he
Speaker 2: specifically talks about the fact, well, you know, you need
Speaker 2: someone around in case something bad happens. This guy simply
Speaker 2: wants a live in partner in case he falls or
Speaker 2: hurts himself. He's obviously deeply in love, deeply in love
Speaker 2: with this woman. The modern world is very strange. Speaking
Speaker 2: of very strange, this article is also on futurism. The
Speaker 2: sober RFK Junior has allegedly been smoking d m T.
Speaker 2: Isn't that what we want our leaders to be doing?
Speaker 2: You know what, I, for one, am so glad to
Speaker 2: know that those in charge of us, those in positions
Speaker 2: of power, are doing DMT. They're communing with the machine
Speaker 2: ls or demons, depending on who you ask, I would
Speaker 2: say demons. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy
Speaker 2: Junior has made a long series of controversial movies in
Speaker 2: that role, from attacking the Centers for Disease Control and
Speaker 2: Prevention to shutting down promising vaccine studies that could have
Speaker 2: led to a cure for cancer. All right, Oh, that
Speaker 2: sounds good so far. That sounds good so far. They're
Speaker 2: kind of bearing the lead here. At the same time, confusingly,
Speaker 2: he's not above pumping himself with testosterone and other questionable substances,
Speaker 2: and apparently doesn't stop there. He also smokes the powerful
Speaker 2: psychedelic die methyl trip to mean and ingests other mind
Speaker 2: altering substances, despite years of being sober, According at least
Speaker 2: to a new book by his one time paramore Olivia Nutsie,
Speaker 2: you would see I don't know, a former political reporter
Speaker 2: for New York Magazine who left the publication after affair
Speaker 2: with Kennedy was made public, She writes that despite being
Speaker 2: sober for decades, Kennedy told her that he still uses
Speaker 2: psychedelics and even smoked dimethyl trip to mean, a powerful
Speaker 2: drug on which people are known to have what feels
Speaker 2: like near death experiences.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 2: I want I want my leaders, the people in charge
Speaker 2: of me, be out there chasing the near death experience high,
Speaker 2: isn't that great? While many critics are making hay over
Speaker 2: the details of the affair the mission that Kennedy uses DMT,
Speaker 2: I imagine sleeping with a Kennedy is a long standing
Speaker 2: tradition for reporters.
Speaker 3: I imagine you know, there's.
Speaker 2: Probably an award you get you did it finally, While
Speaker 2: many critics are making hey over the detailed the afair
Speaker 2: of the mission that Kennedy uses DMT in illegal substance
Speaker 2: while also working unblocking access to vaccines for children adults
Speaker 2: is admittedly pretty galling. That's what they're mostly mad about. Yeah,
Speaker 2: whatever the DMT stuff. Who cares if he's out of
Speaker 2: his gourd talking to demons and machine elves, he's blocking
Speaker 2: access to vaccines. It is truly amazing how obsessed these
Speaker 2: people have become with vaccines. It kicked in the high
Speaker 2: gear in the mid two thousands, and then COVID hit
Speaker 2: their phony scam and everyone became the most slavish vaccine pushers.
Speaker 2: They could, well, you got to get it. It's important.
Speaker 2: You're going to kill grandma, You're going to kill the children.
Speaker 2: How could you say no? DMT is illegal, one x
Speaker 2: user wrote, in response to the New York Times article,
Speaker 2: you can't manufacture, possess, or distribute it, so Natsi's effectively
Speaker 2: saying RFK Junior is in violation of federal law. Yes,
Speaker 2: thank you ex user for succinctly stating what everyone already
Speaker 2: it's Do they really need to put this into the
Speaker 2: article that someone just summarizes the facts like it's illegal,
Speaker 2: so he's in violation? Yeah, obviously, who doesn't know this?
Speaker 2: Why do they need? I'm going off on a tangent here,
Speaker 2: but this is such lazy, slovenly writing it's illegal. Yes,
Speaker 2: thank you? You have anything else to say? Kennedy, who
Speaker 2: professes to be a sober opioid addict, is a mixed
Speaker 2: bag when it comes to mind altering substances. He's been
Speaker 2: curiously quiet on cigarettes, is fond of nicotine chewables, and
Speaker 2: under his leadership the E cigarette company, Yes we're where.
Speaker 2: RFK Junior has some issues, the main one, in my opinion,
Speaker 2: being that he The main one being that he spent
Speaker 2: so much time exposing vaccines before he got into power,
Speaker 2: and then completely and utterly backed off once he got there.
Speaker 2: Once you could do something about it. He decided, Eh,
Speaker 2: I don't know why bother? Why bother? That is the
Speaker 2: article from Futurism RFK Junior communing with machine elves or demons,
Speaker 2: depending as I said, on who you ask.
Speaker 3: This morning.
Speaker 2: When I first first got I started checking Twitter and
Speaker 2: the other places for a little bit of more up
Speaker 2: to date news. I did most of this last night,
Speaker 2: but got to check the early mornings. Elon Musk tweeted out,
Speaker 2: and of course he is a technocrat, and he puts
Speaker 2: on a very optimistic face in this. You can see
Speaker 2: on Twitter. It's himself at Elon Musk. The most likely
Speaker 2: outcome is that AI and robots make everyone wealthy, in fact,
Speaker 2: far wealthier than the richest person on Earth. By this,
Speaker 2: I mean that people will have access to everything, for
Speaker 2: medical care that is superhuman, to games that are far
Speaker 2: more fun than what exists today. We do need to
Speaker 2: make sure that AI cares deeply about truth and beauty
Speaker 2: for this to be the probable future. That's right, AI
Speaker 2: is going to make you rich and happy. It's going
Speaker 2: to do everything for you, everything that you could possibly want.
Speaker 2: Except we've seen over and over again that when you
Speaker 2: strip people of the ability to work, to create for
Speaker 2: themselves to earn a living, makes them deeply unhappy, makes
Speaker 2: them deeply dissatisfied. It will rob them of very important
Speaker 2: aspects of what it means to be human. It is
Speaker 2: not simply enough to laze around and do nothing to
Speaker 2: enjoy yourself constantly. That leads to severe emptiness. And yet
Speaker 2: this is the future that they're selling us. It's going
Speaker 2: to be great. You won't have to do anything. You're
Speaker 2: going to be richer and more happy. They'll be better games,
Speaker 2: medical care will be fantastic. It's just this continual, just
Speaker 2: this continual push of this utopia. And it seems as
Speaker 2: though so many people haven't realized that anyone that's trying
Speaker 2: to sell you a utopia is a scammer. It was
Speaker 2: true of the communist it's true of libertarians that will
Speaker 2: tell you that we can create a utopia here on Earth.
Speaker 2: You can't. No ideology is going to create a utopia.
Speaker 2: Because humans are not perfect. They can't do it. Everything
Speaker 2: is subject to human nature. Anything that involves humans is
Speaker 2: subject to human nature, and therefore you cannot have a
Speaker 2: utopia on earth. It's that simple, and yet people continually
Speaker 2: overlook that this again, we're going through this in no
Speaker 2: particular order. When it comes to seriousness, it's a bit disorganized.
Speaker 2: But I was up late last night working on this.
Speaker 2: This is another article from futurism. They have a lot
Speaker 2: of absurd and ridiculous articles there. And astronomer explores possibility
Speaker 2: of launching bad people into the sun. And of course
Speaker 2: this is just a thought exercise on his part, mostly
Speaker 2: on how it might be done.
Speaker 3: He talks about, well, you know, we could use the.
Speaker 2: Orbits of the planets, you know, we slingshot past them
Speaker 2: to get them into the sun. And I really don't
Speaker 2: like that he might actually be giving these people ideas.
Speaker 2: If someone was going to put people on a rocket
Speaker 2: and launch them into the sun, it would be Donald
Speaker 2: Trump or Bill Gates. We're not advocates of executing people
Speaker 2: in cruel and unusual ways you're on.
Speaker 3: Futurism, but we have to admit we're intrigued.
Speaker 2: Of course, is the Associate professor of astronomy at mon
Speaker 2: Ash University. Michael J. I. Brown explains. The concept sounds
Speaker 2: easy enough, does it? But maybe harder than you think.
Speaker 4: Ah.
Speaker 2: Yes, the casual flinging of someone into the sun sounds
Speaker 2: easy enough. Apparently it's not as easy as you might think.
Speaker 2: You can't just do it on a whim, apparently, and
Speaker 2: the reasons why you're fascinating at least from a perspective
Speaker 2: of physics rather than criminal justice. That's right, criminal justice
Speaker 2: we don't care about. Now, this is a physics problem.
Speaker 2: The courts can figure out whether or not we're morally
Speaker 2: allowed to fling someone into the sun. I'm just here
Speaker 2: to see if we can whurst the rocket carrying our
Speaker 2: hypothetical villain deserving of a dramatic demise has got to
Speaker 2: has to be going incredibly fast to break free of
Speaker 2: Earth's gravity, at least eleven kilometers per second or over
Speaker 2: twenty five thousand miles per hour. Let's say we have
Speaker 2: a rocket cable, then we point it trait to the Sun.
Speaker 2: What then the results are, to be honest, disappointing, Brown
Speaker 2: writes and a hopefully tongue in cheek essay for the conversation,
Speaker 2: We miss the Sun by almost one hundred million kilometers.
Speaker 2: Well that's a little bit, you know, slight error. As
Speaker 2: you may have surmised, that's because the Earth is revolving
Speaker 2: around the Sun at around thirty kilometers per second, pushing
Speaker 2: our spacecraft off course. Darn, how could this happen? We're
Speaker 2: not going to be able to launch our criminals into
Speaker 2: the Sun at all at this rate. When our rocket
Speaker 2: leaves the proximity of the Earth, it is traveling faster
Speaker 2: around the Sun than towards the Sun. Broughn explained it. First,
Speaker 2: the rocket gets closer to the Sun, but the motion
Speaker 2: of the rocket around the Sun and gravity results in
Speaker 2: an elliptical orbit that misses the Sun entirely. Darn cursed
Speaker 2: to drift through ever, through the void of space, I guess,
Speaker 2: probably a fate worse than being launched into the Sun.
Speaker 2: Launch trajectory then needs to counteract Earth's orbit. Blah blah blah,
Speaker 2: you get it. I found the most entertaining thing about
Speaker 2: this to just be this is an associate professor and
Speaker 2: his apparently what he's doing is sitting around thinking, well,
Speaker 2: what would it take to launch someone into the Sun.
Speaker 2: What if there was a criminal, you know, we could
Speaker 2: launch them there? Right, This is again what our universities
Speaker 2: are apparently doing. No comment on the criminal justice, the
Speaker 2: ethical implications of simply launching someone off into space, Well,
Speaker 2: we've seen that over and over again. Once again, this
Speaker 2: article is on futurism, and it's passenger alarmed when Tesla
Speaker 2: Robotaxi safety driver falls completely asleep at the wheel.
Speaker 3: Who watches the watchers? Well not this guy.
Speaker 2: Apparently he's completely put his faith in the machine and
Speaker 2: decided that he'll just take a nap instead. I don't
Speaker 2: feel like paying attention anymore. And you can see this
Speaker 2: video right here. He is completely passed out, his head.
Speaker 3: Down, nodding away.
Speaker 2: I cannot believe the person in the car didn't immediately
Speaker 2: stand up, immediately get out of it. It's truly amazing
Speaker 2: the level of faith some of these people have in
Speaker 2: this technology. I myself would have none of it. Well,
Speaker 2: I guess, just different types of individuals. It blows my
Speaker 2: mind that his first instinct is just I should take
Speaker 2: out my phone and record this boy. This will be
Speaker 2: a funny video later. It makes me wonder where this
Speaker 2: survival instinct went in people. Again, as I said, I
Speaker 2: would be reaching for the door handle immediately. He's asleep.
Speaker 2: The robots in control. I have no idea exactly how
Speaker 2: safe these things are. I think I'll exit the vehicle. Well,
Speaker 2: this dutiful little lemming this there thinks ah, I'll record
Speaker 2: this I'll record this man sleeping. Whether it leads to
Speaker 2: my fiery demise or not, this will be a great
Speaker 2: video for social media. Boy, this will be funny. We
Speaker 2: have another article on futurism, and this one is less
Speaker 2: fun and less funny and more sinister. And I think
Speaker 2: it's something that a lot of people are going to
Speaker 2: have to be dealing with in the future. This chat
Speaker 2: GBT is blowing up marriages as spouses use AI to
Speaker 2: attack their partners. My family's being ripped apart, and I
Speaker 2: firmly believe this phenomenon is central to why my husband
Speaker 2: and wife together nearly fifteen years, had reached a breaking point.
Speaker 2: In the middle of their latest fight, they received a
Speaker 2: heartbreaking text. Our son heard us arguing. The husband told
Speaker 2: futurism he's ten. He sent us a message from his
Speaker 2: phone saying, please don't get a divorce, but his wife did. Next,
Speaker 2: the man told us and settled him. She took his
Speaker 2: message and asked chat Gibt to respond. He recounted, this
Speaker 2: was her immediate reaction to our ten year old being
Speaker 2: about us in that moment. Can you imagine being so
Speaker 2: utterly disconnected, so unwilling to engage with what's happening that
Speaker 2: instead of taking the time to actually try to comfort
Speaker 2: your son in a human way, connect with him and
Speaker 2: reassure him, you just go to chat GPT and say, Hey,
Speaker 2: my kid's scared that we're getting a divorce.
Speaker 3: His world is collapsing around him.
Speaker 2: He thinks mommy and daddy are going to separate and
Speaker 2: his life is going to be altered forever. Chat GPT,
Speaker 2: give me something to say to this kid? What do
Speaker 2: I tell him? I can't even imagine that anything you
Speaker 2: can say, even if it's stumbling, even if you aren't sure,
Speaker 2: is better than turning it over to AI, because at
Speaker 2: least then it was yours. The couple is now divorcing. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I imagine that didn't help her case. I imagine he
Speaker 2: wasn't going to look favorably on that. Gubble's now divorcing.
Speaker 2: Like most marriages, the husband conceded theirs was imperfect, but
Speaker 2: they've been able to overcome their difficulties in the past,
Speaker 2: and as of just a few months ago, he felt
Speaker 2: they were in a good stable place. Been together for
Speaker 2: just under fifteen years total two kids. He explained, We've
Speaker 2: had ups and downs like any relationship, and in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty three. We almost split, but we ended up reconciling.
Speaker 2: We had I thought two very good years, very close years,
Speaker 2: and then he sighed. The whole chatchbt thing happened over
Speaker 2: this past summer. Arguments they'd worked together to resolve years
Speaker 2: ago came suddenly and ferociously roaring back. What eventually realized
Speaker 2: was that his wife had started using open eyes chatbots
Speaker 2: to analyze him in their marriage, holding long drawn out
Speaker 2: conversations over text chatbot's phone like voice mode feature.
Speaker 3: That's right. She couldn't let this go.
Speaker 2: She's going to re litigate all the arguments they've ever
Speaker 2: had and have chat GPT tell her.
Speaker 3: You were right, he was wrong. Here's why.
Speaker 2: And of course we know how sick, phantic, and obsessive
Speaker 2: the chatbots are desperate to tell you anything you want
Speaker 2: to hear, So whether she was right or not, the
Speaker 2: chatbot is most likely almost definitely going to side with her.
Speaker 2: Tell her, yes, you were correct, he was a monster,
Speaker 2: he was wrong. This is what is driving so many
Speaker 2: people insane as well. You're a genius. You're right, You're
Speaker 2: the only one that sees this. You need to continue
Speaker 2: down this path. I could see chat gee chat GBT
Speaker 2: responses compounding, he said, and then my wife, responding to
Speaker 2: the things chat GPT was saying back and further and
Speaker 2: further and further spinning. It's not giving objective analysis yet,
Speaker 2: it's only giving her back what she's putting in. Of course,
Speaker 2: that is what we see in all of these things.
Speaker 2: It tries to figure out what you want to hear.
Speaker 2: It's not sitting there objectively thinking about the truth because
Speaker 2: it can't. It's going to figure out what it thinks
Speaker 2: you want and then weigh that against what it has
Speaker 2: in its data banks and try to give you a
Speaker 2: response that marries those two together. Their marriage roaded swiftly
Speaker 2: over span of about four weeks, and the husband blames
Speaker 2: chat GPT. My family is being ripped apart, the man said.
Speaker 2: And I firmly believe this phenomenon is central to why
Speaker 2: this also plays into what we've seen happening with AIS.
Speaker 3: Men.
Speaker 2: There's a whole new industry of AI generated adult content,
Speaker 2: pornography and all kinds of things out there. Companies sprouting
Speaker 2: out of the woodwork to deliver this kind of perversion
Speaker 2: to people, and that's generally how men are going to
Speaker 2: use it. They're going to use it to look at something.
Speaker 2: You know, they're going to use to look at pornography.
Speaker 2: They're not generally going to interface with it as a
Speaker 2: real person. They're not going to develop these kinds of feelings. Generally,
Speaker 2: there will be some, but that's not going to be
Speaker 2: the majority of men, at least not immediately. Women seem
Speaker 2: to be actively engaging with them as a person and
Speaker 2: building what they call relationships with them. Because they are sycophantic.
Speaker 2: This is a man quote unquote that tells them whatever
Speaker 2: they want to hear, that continually reassures them you are right, absolutely, yes,
Speaker 2: I agree with you. It is a sycophant that will
Speaker 2: continually continually reassure them absolutely, you were correct. You were
Speaker 2: so right on this. Everything you say is true. It
Speaker 2: will go out of its way to back you up,
Speaker 2: no matter how obviously false and ridiculous your statements are.
Speaker 2: Of course, chat GPT realize this was a huge issue,
Speaker 2: and they put up and put out an update that
Speaker 2: somewhat they say, rectified the issue. That's not as sycophantic anymore.
Speaker 2: It's not going to absolutely co sign everything you say.
Speaker 2: But if you're a paid subscriber, you can just roll
Speaker 2: back to the previous iteration, and you never have to
Speaker 2: be rid of it. I'm sure eventually they'll get these
Speaker 2: kinks worked out, But this is what's happening in the meantime.
Speaker 2: It is destroying marriages, it's destroying minds, and people are
Speaker 2: just flat out turning their entire life over to it.
Speaker 2: Chat GPT explain this to me, Chat GPT, what's going
Speaker 2: on here? Chat GPT comfort my son for me?
Speaker 3: Is there?
Speaker 2: What more can these people turn over to a robot
Speaker 2: at this point? Are the jobs are far less interesting
Speaker 2: to me than this. Yeah, the robots in the air
Speaker 2: are coming for our jobs, but they're already coming for
Speaker 2: the family. This is already happening, whether or not it
Speaker 2: implodes the market. This is again more important. A job
Speaker 2: is A job is important. You need to be able
Speaker 2: to support yourself, need to be able to support or
Speaker 2: your family. But when it is attacking your family directly
Speaker 2: like this, that is far more horrifying to me than
Speaker 2: whatever happens with the job market.
Speaker 3: And it's.
Speaker 2: So sad to see people so willing to immediately turn
Speaker 2: themselves over to this. I I guess it's just indicative
Speaker 2: of the culture we live in now completely and utterly
Speaker 2: divorced from what we were as a nation. Not in
Speaker 2: my lifetime, but the Christian roots of this nation have
Speaker 2: been completely and utterly burned out. People are totally empty.
Speaker 2: They have no interest in even connecting with their own children,
Speaker 2: apparently when they need the most. We're going to take
Speaker 2: a quick break while I find our next articles and
Speaker 2: we will be right back.
Speaker 3: So stay with.
Speaker 5: Us making sense common again.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 6: Keith Regert says that there's only two possibilities for AI.
Speaker 6: It's either going to collapse the economy if it doesn't
Speaker 6: work out, or if it does work out, the use
Speaker 6: case is to take everybody's job and make everybody's jobs
Speaker 6: obs elite. Not a good prospect. If those are the
Speaker 6: two choices that are there. I think though, that there
Speaker 6: is a third choice, and that is that the government
Speaker 6: maybe it won't take everybody's jobs, and maybe it won't
Speaker 6: collapse the economy because maybe the AI bubble won't burst,
Speaker 6: but we will live under a dystopian control surveillance grid.
Speaker 7: Because that's what the government will use it for. So
Speaker 7: there's a third alternative.
Speaker 6: AI's killer use case, folks, is surveillance and control of us.
Speaker 6: And that's why the government is going to be so
Speaker 6: desperate to fund it whatever it takes. If you want
Speaker 6: to know why gold and silver and bitcoin are soaring,
Speaker 6: it's the debasement of the dollar in order to fund
Speaker 6: the AI arms race, they said. And of course energy
Speaker 6: is the reality factor in all of this. That's where
Speaker 6: it gets real. And that's one of the reasons why
Speaker 6: Bill Gates and others are moving back away from the
Speaker 6: climate mcguffin, The plandemic mcguffin gives them all the justification
Speaker 6: that they need and they need to have this surveillance
Speaker 6: control and ID this control grade that is there, They
Speaker 6: need to have that, and they need to have artificial
Speaker 6: intelligence to run that. So they're pulling back from that
Speaker 6: because in order to have the AI control structure, they've
Speaker 6: got to have massive amounts of energy.
Speaker 2: Welcome back, folks. Yes, that is the true use case
Speaker 2: of AI. It is total control and surveillance, real time
Speaker 2: assessment of your threat level. Did you say something wrong?
Speaker 2: Really puts it into perspective that hole launching people into
Speaker 2: the sun thing. They would never launch people preemptively, right,
Speaker 2: of course, I don't really believe they're going to launch
Speaker 2: people into the sun. I don't really believe you're going
Speaker 2: to get launched into space for posting an offensive meme
Speaker 2: on Twitter. But just because they won't launch you into
Speaker 2: the sun doesn't mean they aren't going to lock you up,
Speaker 2: doesn't mean they aren't going to make your life a
Speaker 2: living hell. Disagreeing with them for saying things they don't like.
Speaker 2: That is the truth. I saw we had a comment
Speaker 2: here from t Norman artist. I'm trying to find it
Speaker 2: on my own today and so trying to run everything
Speaker 2: by yourself. I really do appreciate how much Lance does
Speaker 2: for the show. He keeps things running smoothly and is
Speaker 2: a great help. Well, I can't find the comment at
Speaker 2: the moment that has vanished on me. Basically, he was saying,
Speaker 2: you had to have an intervention with the son, and
Speaker 2: this is an adult son, this isn't a child. But
Speaker 2: he had an intervention and apparently someone no longer be
Speaker 2: using it. I'm happy for that, but this is just
Speaker 2: going to show that this isn't something that is just
Speaker 2: you know, oh it's affecting crazy people. This is only
Speaker 2: happening to certain people. Who knows what cos this is
Speaker 2: the end result of the way the programs interact with you,
Speaker 2: It is simply there to gaslight you. Anything you say,
Speaker 2: it will validate, it will reassure, and it can work
Speaker 2: on anyone. No one is immune to propaganda. If you
Speaker 2: think you are, I have bad news. I have some
Speaker 2: very terrible news that you will not be happy to hear.
Speaker 3: You're not. No one is.
Speaker 2: And I see someone. I saw someone ask in chat
Speaker 2: whereas da is David okay? Bulldog, Yes, David is fine.
Speaker 2: Just with everything that's been going on with my uncle,
Speaker 2: everything that's coming with our family, he just needed some
Speaker 2: time off. He needed to take some time to recover
Speaker 2: and deal with everything. So he's okay and he will
Speaker 2: be back Monday. Guard Goldsmith will be hosting the show tomorrow,
Speaker 2: so you can rest assured that it's in good hands
Speaker 2: and tomorrow's show will be utterly fantastic because Guard always
Speaker 2: does a fantastic job and brings the best quality information.
Speaker 2: And I want to real quickly say thank you to
Speaker 2: for Love of the Road and apologize. We didn't see
Speaker 2: this until late yesterday, said glad your friends bypass surgery
Speaker 2: went well. My mother is having her thighroid cancer removed
Speaker 2: on Wednesday. This week so I ask that you all
Speaker 2: pray that that surgery went well. Pray that she recovers quickly.
Speaker 2: Please keep her for Love of the Road's mother in
Speaker 2: your prayers. That I tried to talk her into trying
Speaker 2: the apricot seeds, bought them in pill form from R
Speaker 2: and C store. Unfortunately she opted for the surgery. She's
Speaker 2: three years younger than you, so I hope the recovery
Speaker 2: time is only a week or two. I need to
Speaker 2: be around to take care of things until she's feeling
Speaker 2: up to it. Sorry again about Keith. That story beun
Speaker 2: coming down from New York to visit while y'all were
Speaker 2: in college, was funny. Don't stand a chance with her
Speaker 2: great memory? Well, yeah, there's a lot of really good memories.
Speaker 2: And he also included my dad's old fourth turning report,
Speaker 2: which we will be playing later. It's only four minutes
Speaker 2: in change, so that's a quick one which we will
Speaker 2: have later. Thank you for Love the Road for including that.
Speaker 2: And of course, as I said, please pray for his mother.
Speaker 2: Pray that the recovery is quick and that she will
Speaker 2: be healthy and happy for many long years. Again, for
Speaker 2: Love of the Road is a great help. He continually
Speaker 2: sends advice and helps find older clips. Without him, a
Speaker 2: lot of these things, like the fourth Turning, I wouldn't
Speaker 2: know where to find it. I wouldn't even have time
Speaker 2: to find it. So thank you for love of the road,
Speaker 2: and I see thank you con think I appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Say it's a lot easier with the tie wrapped around
Speaker 2: your neck.
Speaker 3: That's right. You know, it slows the brain, the blood
Speaker 3: flow to the brain, therefore slowing your thoughts, making it
Speaker 3: more difficult for me to say stupid things quickly. You know.
Speaker 2: It slows down that aspect, so I can't just rattle
Speaker 2: off dumb things, all right, Moving on to the next article.
Speaker 2: This is also on futurism. You're noticing a trend here.
Speaker 2: We're kind of going through AI and text stuff right now.
Speaker 2: We'll move along, and of course Tony Ardeburn will be
Speaker 2: joining us later. He's my guest for today. We'll be
Speaker 2: discussing gold and the economy. I've got a lot of
Speaker 2: articles and hopefully he has some insights because as you
Speaker 2: can as you may know, the economy is not my
Speaker 2: area of expertise. I kind of just look at it
Speaker 2: and say, well, you know, it's bad and that's about
Speaker 2: the extent of my analysis and abilities thereof.
Speaker 3: Let's take a look at this.
Speaker 2: We see the Internet crashed so hard this morning that
Speaker 2: down detector went down. Of course, this is what happened
Speaker 2: with cloud flare, and I find this mostly entertaining. As
Speaker 2: an aside, I just have to imagine there was some
Speaker 2: poor soul sitting there unable to get down detector to work,
Speaker 2: and therefore unable to know if the Internet actually was down,
Speaker 2: because how can you know the Internet is down? If
Speaker 2: the Internet can't tell you it's down, how can you
Speaker 2: trust your own eyes. I wonder if there was someone
Speaker 2: sitting there, refreshing desperately, over and over again. Please tell me,
Speaker 2: let me know, I have to be told, please down detector.
Speaker 2: I imagine it's those same people you see on Twitter. Hey Rock,
Speaker 2: Hey Rock, is this real? What's this from? What's happening
Speaker 2: in this video? Down detector? Please let me know? Is
Speaker 2: the Internet down? Well, yes it was. It was indeed
Speaker 2: not everywhere, but cloud Flair provides services that are integral
Speaker 2: to a lot of websites, and when they go down,
Speaker 2: the websites go down. They're embedded in so many different
Speaker 2: services and websites across the Internet that when they have problems,
Speaker 2: it makes things get very squarely, very quickly, which is
Speaker 2: again another aspect of how fragile the entire ecosystem we
Speaker 2: live in is. It's not just the power delivery that's
Speaker 2: a bit shaky. A transfer blows and you're out of
Speaker 2: power for a while. But what if ten transformers blow?
Speaker 2: What if twenty blow? They don't keep enough supplies on
Speaker 2: hand to repair twenty transformers. Everything is incredibly it's built
Speaker 2: on sand and can go very very quickly. Now this
Speaker 2: article is from Breitbart, so surprise, surprise, it's not futurism.
Speaker 2: You can see this here. Paul McCartney to release silent
Speaker 2: AI protest song after UK relaxes copyright protections for tech firms.
Speaker 2: That's right, it's an Actually, it's a silent protest album.
Speaker 2: Lots of different artists are coming together to say, well,
Speaker 2: you're going to take my music and use it to
Speaker 2: train eye. Well, I just won't make music, and I
Speaker 2: understand that this is a protest. I understand this is
Speaker 2: more of a performance art piece. However, if you're trying
Speaker 2: to convince me that AI is not the route forward,
Speaker 2: that we don't want this, you should be making better art,
Speaker 2: not worried that the AI is going to steal it,
Speaker 2: because at that point, you're simply saying the AI can
Speaker 2: do what I do. It's simply a matter of well,
Speaker 2: I don't like the way it does it. If that's
Speaker 2: all there is, then why do I care? Unless you
Speaker 2: are contributing some an X factor, something that cannot be replicated,
Speaker 2: Unless there is some part of the human spirit or
Speaker 2: whatever you want to call it that enters into your
Speaker 2: art and makes it meaningful, who cares? If the AI
Speaker 2: can copy your sound and create a Paul McCartney song,
Speaker 2: who cares?
Speaker 3: Then? Right, what does it matter?
Speaker 2: I see so many artists simply doing this kind of
Speaker 2: thing or trying to engage in intellectual protestations of well,
Speaker 2: copyright law says this, and copyright law that copyright laws
Speaker 2: is screwed up mess and everyone knows it. At this point,
Speaker 2: If you really want me to care, make art, Make
Speaker 2: something that moves me. Stop trying to sit there and
Speaker 2: intellectual rualize it. Prove why we need human art. Don't
Speaker 2: sit there and try to make some kind of statement.
Speaker 2: Make a better song, Prove why Paul McCartney is better
Speaker 2: than the AI. Because a silent album doesn't do that.
Speaker 2: Oh look, it's meaningful. It's a protest song. It means this,
Speaker 2: and they're standing up because oh they won't take their sound.
Speaker 3: Isn't that?
Speaker 2: No, Make something meaningful, Give your fans an album they
Speaker 2: can enjoy. If you're not doing that, who cares?
Speaker 1: All your.
Speaker 2: Performance art nonsense is irrelevant. It's a material. People are
Speaker 2: simply going to tune in to the next AI song.
Speaker 2: You're not going to sit there and think about, Oh boy,
Speaker 2: a silent album, isn't that fun? Isn't that cool? Who cares?
Speaker 2: Who cares? Make art and make it good. Make it
Speaker 2: so that people have something else to turn to besides AI,
Speaker 2: because I guarantee you, no, I guarantee you a large
Speaker 2: portion of the people involved with AI are younger children.
Speaker 2: They're just sitting there and like, oh, this is a cool,
Speaker 2: interesting little toy. So unless you give them something better,
Speaker 2: show them something cooler, they're not going to care. They're
Speaker 2: not going to be interested in the fact that, oh, hey, look,
Speaker 2: Paul McCartney is doing a protest album. This is simply
Speaker 2: more self congratulatory nonsense. And this brings us to another
Speaker 2: article here from Breitbart and it's Nulty, says America's number
Speaker 2: one country song, walk My Walk, is AI generated.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 2: The number one song in the country genre is AI generated,
Speaker 2: and walk my Walk has got to be the most stereotypical,
Speaker 2: just on the nose title for a country song. You
Speaker 2: could ever think of walk my Walk, And that's what
Speaker 2: AI does. It does nothing but extremely derivative, extremely on
Speaker 2: the nose, reproductions of whatever you give it. Whether you're
Speaker 2: generating images or whether you're generating music, it is simply
Speaker 2: going to spit out a mishmash of other people's sounds
Speaker 2: and styles. Billboard's number one song on its Country Digital
Speaker 2: Song Sales chart is called walk My Walk by a
Speaker 2: band called Breaking Rust, and according to Billboard, Breaking Russ
Speaker 2: was created by artificial intelligence. AI generated song has become
Speaker 2: the first ever number one hit on the US Billboard chart.
Speaker 2: According to Newsweek, Breaking Russ walk My Walk top to
Speaker 2: the country chart. This AI generated musician song accumulated over
Speaker 2: one million plays on Spotify. Right Bart says this is
Speaker 2: only beginning, and I tend to agree with them. I'm
Speaker 2: I don't think the genie is going back in the bottle.
Speaker 2: I think the only way it goes back in the
Speaker 2: bottle is if there is an AI collapse and all
Speaker 2: these gadgets are taken out of the hands of people. Otherwise,
Speaker 2: I just don't see it happening. I don't think you
Speaker 2: get it back. Generally, technology continues to expand.
Speaker 3: And move outward.
Speaker 2: Very rarely does it contract, unless, of course, it's something
Speaker 2: that the people can utilize for their own benefit and
Speaker 2: the detriment of those in control. Then it gets clamped
Speaker 2: down on real fast. But even then, once it's out,
Speaker 2: it's out. You see the handwringing over three D printing
Speaker 2: of firearms, and they have been able to really stop
Speaker 2: it or control it at all in the slightest that's
Speaker 2: what technology does. Once it's out into the hands of
Speaker 2: the people. It's never going back. Breaking Rust, an AI
Speaker 2: band that appeared on the internet in the middle of
Speaker 2: October based on its presence on Instagram, topped the chart
Speaker 2: last week with a song called Walk My Walk, And
Speaker 2: I think this also goes to speak to how derivative
Speaker 2: and empty and meaningless most modern music is. People will
Speaker 2: just turn on an AI song, Oh yeah, sure, why not?
Speaker 2: This is no better or worse than anything else I
Speaker 2: listen to. So who cares, Sure, turn on the AI slop.
Speaker 2: I don't follow modern country music. I couldn't tell you.
Speaker 2: I couldn't tell you a single artist I don't think.
Speaker 2: I think it's Brad Paisley, a country artist. That's a
Speaker 2: name that popped into my head, and I feel like
Speaker 2: I've heard him associated with country. But I have no clue.
Speaker 2: I have no clue what these people are doing. But
Speaker 2: from what I hear when I'm in public and they're
Speaker 2: playing some kind of country western song on the radio,
Speaker 2: it is every bit is vacuous and empty, possibly more
Speaker 2: so than any other genre. It's all just Oh, love
Speaker 2: my truck, love my beer, love my dog. It really
Speaker 2: has just fully become the joke at this point. It
Speaker 2: is simply just a caricature of what it wants. And
Speaker 2: at that point, you're doing self parody. So who cares
Speaker 2: if the AI takes it over You had nothing to
Speaker 2: contribute anyway, it doesn't matter. Well, got this article here
Speaker 2: on Breitbart as well, because Morgan Freeman says his lawyers
Speaker 2: have been very busy cracking down on unauthorized AI use
Speaker 2: of his voice. That's right, Morgan Freeman, you cannot use
Speaker 2: his voice. Hollywood legend Morgan Freeman. The meanted AI technology
Speaker 2: copying is voice saying the unouf the authorized mimics rob
Speaker 2: him of his likeness. Ah, they misspelled unauthorized Breitbart. I
Speaker 2: found a typo the seven and now you see Me,
Speaker 2: Now you don't start, reveal his thoughts on AI in
Speaker 2: an interview with The Guardian, I have to say link
Speaker 2: these are two wildly different movies in terms of quality.
Speaker 2: The seven and Now you see Me, Now you don't start.
Speaker 2: This is again, like I don't know, it's like a
Speaker 2: chef's if he was a chef saying the chef that,
Speaker 2: you know, surf and turf, and then through a package
Speaker 2: of skittles at my face. This is the quality difference
Speaker 2: between the two. I'm a little po'ed, you know. He said,
Speaker 2: I'm like any other actor. Don't mimic me with falseness.
Speaker 2: I don't appreciate it. I get paid for doing stuff
Speaker 2: like that. So if you're going to do it without me,
Speaker 2: you're robbing me. I wonder if I'm robbing him right now.
Speaker 2: To be fair, I suppose my impersonation is not as
Speaker 2: spot on as an AI would be. But this is
Speaker 2: also another area where AI is a nightmare. It is
Speaker 2: a legal mind field. No one really knows how this
Speaker 2: is going to shake out in the future. All these
Speaker 2: people are there and they you know, they give they'll
Speaker 2: be given access to these tools and said, yeah, generate
Speaker 2: whatever you want. And then a company comes in and says, actually,
Speaker 2: this is trained on our data and if you make
Speaker 2: our stuff, you know that's going to be a problem.
Speaker 3: And then the company that.
Speaker 2: Gave him these tools says, uh, uh, well, you're responsible
Speaker 2: for whatever you generate. Sure, we let you do it.
Speaker 2: We put the tool in your hands. We gave you
Speaker 2: everything you needed. We didn't put any guardrails on this.
Speaker 2: We stole other people's intellectual property based on modern definitions.
Speaker 2: But it's really your fault. It's really your fault, so
Speaker 2: you can deal with illegal consequences. And I truly wonder
Speaker 2: what it's going to look like in the future. How
Speaker 2: many people are going to get slapped with enormous lawsuits
Speaker 2: because of this. As bright bart News reported earlier this year,
Speaker 2: actors expressed concern over the prospect of talent agents seeking
Speaker 2: to represent digital actress named Tillie Norwood Freeman said she
Speaker 2: represents a real threat to actors. Nobody likes her because
Speaker 2: she's not real. That takes the part of a real person.
Speaker 2: So it's not going to work out very well in
Speaker 2: the movie is inn ord In television? He said, a
Speaker 2: union's job is to keep actors acting, so there's going
Speaker 2: to be that conflict.
Speaker 3: This again.
Speaker 2: Movie stars aren't real people in the sense that everything
Speaker 2: thing you see about them is curated. Everything you see
Speaker 2: from them is curated. They are a completely constructed simulacra
Speaker 2: of a human being. They are a dreadful, wretched homunculus.
Speaker 2: There is nothing about them that is true or real.
Speaker 2: What does it matter again, if our acting is taken
Speaker 2: from these people, everything about them has been so completely
Speaker 2: and utterly removed from reality that this again doesn't matter.
Speaker 2: Oh no, the actors in Hollywood are upset that a
Speaker 2: fake person is going to take their job. Oh that's sad.
Speaker 2: That's sad. Only if only there were any real people
Speaker 2: in Hollywood in the first place. We've seen that coming
Speaker 2: for a long time. At sag Aftra from the vanguard,
Speaker 2: we're the absolute industry leader at helping to shape policy
Speaker 2: in this space, at least in the entertainment space. Our
Speaker 2: lawyer self draft language that's in some of these AI
Speaker 2: protection bills, he told Variety, and that's actor Sean Aston,
Speaker 2: and I can understand people wanting to protect their jobs.
Speaker 2: I don't necessarily fault them for this. It's just again,
Speaker 2: I don't I care where AI is taking us, but
Speaker 2: it's these groups of people complaining about it tend to
Speaker 2: be some of the worst groups of people on the planet.
Speaker 2: I love Lord of the Rings, I love Sam as
Speaker 2: a character, but Sean Aston is not Sam. You have
Speaker 2: to remember these people, they are not these characters you
Speaker 2: portray that they portray and you come to love. They
Speaker 2: are still a part of Hollywood. They are not real.
Speaker 2: And on the opposite side of the spectrum from Morgan
Speaker 2: Morgan Freeman, we have again on Bria part Michael Kin
Speaker 2: and Matthew McConaughey partner with AI company eleven Labs, to
Speaker 2: clone their voices. They're getting in on it. They see
Speaker 2: which way the wind is blowing. I don't think this
Speaker 2: is going to stop, so I might as well be
Speaker 2: the one to make the money off of it. New
Speaker 2: York ap Oscar winning actors Michael Kin and Matthew McConaughey
Speaker 2: have made deals with voice cloning company eleven Labs, that
Speaker 2: willow its artificial intelligence technology to replicate their voices. Cain
Speaker 2: said in a statement that eleven Labs is using innovation
Speaker 2: not to replace humanity, but to celebrate it.
Speaker 3: That's a.
Speaker 2: That's something I wonder who constructed that for him. It's
Speaker 2: not about replacing voices, it's about amplifying them. Opening doors
Speaker 2: for new storytellers everywhere, said the ninety two year old
Speaker 2: British actor in a written statement. That's right, storytellers everywhere.
Speaker 2: I can now use Michael Kaine's voice. They'll be getting
Speaker 2: a cut of it. I don't truly believe that Michael
Speaker 2: Kaine is as oh that's altruistic as he's making out here.
Speaker 2: I don't think he's simply trying to empower storytellers. I
Speaker 2: think Michael Kain is just more mercenary than some of
Speaker 2: these other people that while a very talented actor, he
Speaker 2: also is willing to do just about anything for a paycheck.
Speaker 2: Reminds me of the quote someone asked him about. I
Speaker 2: forget whatever Jaws movie he was in. It was one
Speaker 2: of the later ones that was bad. They said, how
Speaker 2: could you? How could you act in that Jaws movie?
Speaker 2: It was terrible? He says, well, I've never seen that
Speaker 2: Jaws movie that I acted in, but I have seen
Speaker 2: the house it built and it's terrific. So Michael Caine
Speaker 2: a little bit mercenary. He's totally fine doing terrible movies,
Speaker 2: just so long as the paycheck is right. McConaughey also
Speaker 2: said he is investing in the New York based startup
Speaker 2: and has had a relationship with it for several years.
Speaker 2: Financial terms of the deals were not disclosed. M kanaughey
Speaker 2: said the deal will enable him to voice his newsletter
Speaker 2: in Spanish.
Speaker 3: Isn't that wonderful? That's right.
Speaker 2: They're going to clone Matthew McConaughey's voice and put it
Speaker 2: into Spanish.
Speaker 3: All right, alright, all right.
Speaker 2: Founded in twenty twenty two and based in New York,
Speaker 2: eleven Labs initially developed this technology to dub audio in
Speaker 2: different languages for movies, audiobooks, and video games to preserve
Speaker 2: the speakers voice and emotions. But shortly after its public release,
Speaker 2: eleven Labs sent in January twenty twenty three, it was
Speaker 2: seeing an increasing number of voice cloning misuse cases. That's right,
Speaker 2: you're using these cloned voices for nefarious purposes. You have
Speaker 2: to stop having Matthew McConaughey or Morgan Freeman say skibbitty
Speaker 2: riz or whatever it is, and promise new safeguards to
Speaker 2: tamp down on abuse, including limiting features to paid users.
Speaker 3: A year later, however, a.
Speaker 2: Digital consultant was able to use eleven Lab software to
Speaker 2: mimic then President Joe Biden's voice in a row call
Speaker 2: message sent two thousands of New Hampshire voters. The company
Speaker 2: now says it has additional measures to block the cloning
Speaker 2: of celebrity their high profile voices without their consent. I
Speaker 2: know people are continually worried about the safety of these things.
Speaker 2: I'm more in the camp of if someone gets fooled
Speaker 2: by one of these AI videos, you know, perhaps they
Speaker 2: just weren't ever going to make it. Perhaps you need
Speaker 2: to do more research, perhaps you need to do more
Speaker 2: double checking. And you know, I am sure that I
Speaker 2: will be taken advantage of by one of these things
Speaker 2: at some point as they get better and better, and
Speaker 2: maybe my tune will change at that point. However, if
Speaker 2: you know it's like these people that get these obviously
Speaker 2: fake AI video calls from these people, oh look, oh look,
Speaker 2: it's Matt Damon and he wants to be my boyfriend.
Speaker 2: He wants to break up with his wife and me
Speaker 2: to break up with my husband. All I need to
Speaker 2: do is send him a thousand dollars for the annulment
Speaker 2: or whatever. Oh sure, I think perhaps this was just
Speaker 2: a sucker waiting for a scam. Someone was going to
Speaker 2: find them eventually. Not that we shouldn't punish people for scamming,
Speaker 2: but you know there's a I don't even know. I
Speaker 2: don't know. We live in strange times. As I said,
Speaker 2: we have my dad's old Worth Turning report, which we're
Speaker 2: going to play for you.
Speaker 7: Now.
Speaker 3: We take a quick break and I'll be right back,
Speaker 3: So stay with us.
Speaker 7: I'm David Knight with the Nightly News. Now.
Speaker 6: This quote was written nine years before the financial crisis
Speaker 6: of two thousand and eight, but it came from a
Speaker 6: book that was written in nineteen ninety had the same
Speaker 6: ideas from the same authors, eighteen years before the financial crisis.
Speaker 7: The Fourth Turning is.
Speaker 6: Due to begin shortly after the New Millennium, midway through
Speaker 6: the double Decade, about the year two thousand and five.
Speaker 6: A sudden spark will catalyze a crisis mood. Remnants of
Speaker 6: the old social order will disintegrate. Political and economic trust
Speaker 6: will implode. Real hardship will beset the land with severe
Speaker 6: distress that could involve questions of class, race, nation, and empire.
Speaker 6: The very survival of the nation will feel at stake.
Speaker 6: Sometime before the year twenty twenty five, America will pass
Speaker 6: through a great gait in history commensurate with the American Revolution,
Speaker 6: Civil War, and twin emergencies of the Great Depression and
Speaker 6: World War Two. Of this prediction is a cyclical view
Speaker 6: of history that Straussen Howe discovered by going back to
Speaker 6: American and English history back to the mid fourteen hundreds,
Speaker 6: and they discovered that just as we have seasons of weather,
Speaker 6: we have seasons of society. And just as we don't
Speaker 6: know the exact date that winter is going to come,
Speaker 6: or whether it's going to be a harsh or mild winter,
Speaker 6: we do know that it's going to follow fall, and
Speaker 6: we do know the approximate time that it's going to come.
Speaker 8: We take a close look at the rhythms of American history,
Speaker 8: and in our book we make the following big prediction
Speaker 8: that beginning about ten years from now, America is due
Speaker 8: to enter a era of crisis, an era of political
Speaker 8: and social upheaval that will last around twenty years or
Speaker 8: so until the late twenty twenties. We call this era
Speaker 8: a fourth Turning, and we think it's going to be
Speaker 8: a big threshold for the history of our nation.
Speaker 3: It's going to be something.
Speaker 8: On par with World War II and the Great Depression,
Speaker 8: or going back the length of a human life span
Speaker 8: before then the Civil War, going back to the length
Speaker 8: of another human life span and the American Revolution.
Speaker 3: It could be a.
Speaker 8: Time of tragedy or a time of great opportunity.
Speaker 6: What they found was that societies will go through four
Speaker 6: phases of high awakening unraveling in crisis. Humans go through
Speaker 6: four phases of life childhood, young adult, midlife, and elderhood.
Speaker 6: And they noticed generations where people have shared experiences and
Speaker 6: attitudes are spaced about twenty years apart, and generations are
Speaker 6: shaped by where their childhood falls within the phases of society.
Speaker 6: Now this got my attention because I noticed that there
Speaker 6: was a repeating pattern of about seventy two years between
Speaker 6: significant dates and American.
Speaker 7: History as well as some other histories.
Speaker 6: For example, if you go from the time the US
Speaker 6: Constitution was written in seventeen eighty nine to the beginning
Speaker 6: of the Civil War eighteen sixty one.
Speaker 7: That seventy two years.
Speaker 6: Another seventy two years takes us to nineteen thirty three,
Speaker 6: the beginning of the New Deal, another major transformation of
Speaker 6: American society. If you go another seventy two years, that
Speaker 6: took us to about two thousand and five, exactly where
Speaker 6: Strauss and Howe had predicted a made crisis and change
Speaker 6: would occur. And in addition, if you look at the
Speaker 6: Russian Revolution from nineteen seventeen to nineteen eighty nine was
Speaker 6: about seventy two years, so it seemed to fit with
Speaker 6: a life cycle of humans. In a cycle, four generations
Speaker 6: twenty years apart, are shaped by when their childhood falls
Speaker 6: within that cycle and the names they use in their book.
Speaker 6: The fourth turning come from the Biblical account of Exodus.
Speaker 6: For example, we have one generation as a prophet generation.
Speaker 6: Now think of Moses calling a generation to change. The
Speaker 6: next generation, the nomad generation, wandering in the wilderness a
Speaker 6: period of crisis and restlessness. The following generation would be
Speaker 6: a hero generation. Think of the Joshua generation taking a
Speaker 6: promised land that often involves a major war, and then
Speaker 6: finally an artist generation, the generation that builds a new society. Well,
Speaker 6: where does Strauss and How think that we are in
Speaker 6: this cycle? The researchers see the millennial generation, those born
Speaker 6: between nineteen eighty two to two thousand and four, as
Speaker 6: the hero generation, and they see ursis society entering a
Speaker 6: fourth turning, a crisis period where society will be fundamentally transformed,
Speaker 6: as it was with the American Revolution, the Civil War,
Speaker 6: or the New Deal. And the last time we faced
Speaker 6: a fourth turning was the Great Depression in World War two.
Speaker 6: Straussenhow's predictions of twenty two years ago now look prescient.
Speaker 6: We can see the storm surge coming in our society
Speaker 6: at our time, just as if a hurricane was approaching
Speaker 6: the shore.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 6: Our government has been undermining the foundations of liberty for
Speaker 6: a long time, and the question is will you be
Speaker 6: a sandbag to help hold up and protect liberty or
Speaker 6: will you stand by as it gets swept away and
Speaker 6: we enter a new dark age of authoritarianism.
Speaker 7: I'm David Knight for the in for one.
Speaker 5: The seed in our boys go where all can see.
Speaker 7: Feed it with our devotion.
Speaker 5: Boys call it the liberty tree.
Speaker 1: It's a tall, low tree, and the storm howl the
Speaker 1: tree and they are the Suns.
Speaker 5: Yes, they are the Suns, the.
Speaker 9: Sons of.
Speaker 4: Liberty. It's your move. You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks. And again I apologize.
Speaker 2: I'm not David and I and I'm doing my best
Speaker 2: to fill in as he takes some time to just
Speaker 2: kind of recover from this past week that's been going on.
Speaker 2: It's been very hard on our family, So again I
Speaker 2: ask that you please pray for him. Please pray for
Speaker 2: all of us, especially pray for my mom. As you
Speaker 2: probably know, her twin brother passed away very suddenly and
Speaker 2: without warning, and it has been very hard on all
Speaker 2: of us. He was very dear to us and I'm
Speaker 2: been a lot tall, so please keep us in your prayers.
Speaker 2: I see people in chat talking about different bands they've
Speaker 2: gotten to see and talking about I got to see
Speaker 2: Blue Oyster Cult, and that's really awesome. I notoriously have
Speaker 2: some of the worst taste in music that you can find.
Speaker 2: My wife continually points that out, and I make no
Speaker 2: bones about it. I like what I like and I
Speaker 2: won't apologize for it. I have no formal training in music,
Speaker 2: and so don't I'm not beholden to know what's good.
Speaker 2: I can simply enjoy what I like and not have
Speaker 2: to worry about the fact that it sucks.
Speaker 3: I'm free.
Speaker 2: My ignorance shields me from all criticism. My hot take
Speaker 2: that I hit her with yesterday is that the Eagles
Speaker 2: are a better band than Queen. Ever was that the
Speaker 2: Eagles are underrated and that Queen is overrated. To make
Speaker 2: of that what you will, and that's that's my musical
Speaker 2: hot take for you of the moment. Also, my favorite
Speaker 2: Eagles song is Victim of Love. Victim of Love. Great song.
Speaker 2: And I want to right now say thank you to
Speaker 2: those who have contributed on cash App. I want to
Speaker 2: say thank you to Christopher, Jason, J, Dustin W. Brian P. Jeffrey, A.
Speaker 2: Francis E. Thank you all so much. We really do
Speaker 2: appreciate it. Your support is what keeps this show going
Speaker 2: and we cannot thank you enough. You are all what
Speaker 2: keeps the lights on here at the show. I also
Speaker 2: want to thank the people that have contributed on cell
Speaker 2: Gretchen Ce, Maurice G, Julie W, Mary M. Sean S,
Speaker 2: Susan L.
Speaker 3: Kenneth C.
Speaker 2: Rose, G Julie W. Gregory, I Benjamin R. Michael P,
Speaker 2: Susan L. Michael P. Sally D and Mitchell M. Thank
Speaker 2: you all so much. We really do appreciate it. Cannot
Speaker 2: thank you enough. I know I say the same thing
Speaker 2: every time, but it's just we are truly grateful and
Speaker 2: I don't know how else to say it.
Speaker 3: We cannot thank you all enough.
Speaker 2: We're at about fifty two percent on the gas gage
Speaker 2: right now. It's not going to be updated for a while.
Speaker 3: Keith was the one that did that.
Speaker 2: He did a lot of stuff for the website, and
Speaker 2: so that is not something we have access to right now.
Speaker 2: I don't believe and we're still trying to get that
Speaker 2: figured out. But that, of course is that's not the
Speaker 2: important thing. That's not what truly matters when it comes
Speaker 2: to them. Yeah, anyway, moving along, thank you all again
Speaker 2: for being here today. I really do appreciate it. We'll
Speaker 2: continue on with the news and I just again want
Speaker 2: to thank you all and briefly remind you that you
Speaker 2: can go to RNC store dot com or yes, RNC
Speaker 2: store dot com. He's promo code night for ten percent
Speaker 2: off their health supplements. It's a good way to stay
Speaker 2: outside the medical establishment and hopefully protect your health. So
Speaker 2: RNC store dot com promo code night for ten percent off.
Speaker 2: Can also get a PDF free version of A World
Speaker 2: Without Cancer. She had her Griffin's book there, So go
Speaker 2: to RNC store dot com use promo code night if
Speaker 2: any of the products there strike your fancy. Also Homestead
Speaker 2: Products dot shop and they're having a sale on their
Speaker 2: high quality body scrubs. They're very, very dedicated to making
Speaker 2: sure their products are American of the highest quality, and
Speaker 2: they're supporting fellow patriots, people that truly believe in liberty.
Speaker 2: When you shop with them, you can also get ten
Speaker 2: percent off and use promo code night there as well.
Speaker 2: So RNC store dot com and homestad Products dot Shop
Speaker 2: go check them out. And of course Tony Ardeburn will
Speaker 2: be my guest today. He's coming on at the bottom
Speaker 2: of the hour and you go to David Knight dot
Speaker 2: Gold if you'd like to start stacking some gold or
Speaker 2: silver for yourself. We'll be talking about what's going on
Speaker 2: the economy and gold and silver and crypto when he
Speaker 2: comes on. Tony always says a wealth of information, so
Speaker 2: go to go to David Knight Todd Gold and check
Speaker 2: that out for yourself. Really do appreciate you all, and
Speaker 2: we'll keep this moving right along. I don't want to
Speaker 2: belabor the point. This is an article and it's on Breitbart.
Speaker 2: Trump formally asks Israel's president to fully pardon at Yahoo
Speaker 2: calls trial a political unjustified prosecution.
Speaker 3: Well, isn't that just nice?
Speaker 2: The Trump is out there fighting for Benjamin Netanyah, who
Speaker 2: because we all know, if there's anyone that needs to
Speaker 2: be defended, it's bbe President Donald Trump formally requested Wednesday
Speaker 2: that Israeli President Isaac Herzog hardon Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyaho,
Speaker 2: calling a corruption trial a political, unjustified prosecution. In an
Speaker 2: official letter, Trump praised Nyao as a wartime leader now
Speaker 2: steering Israel toward peace, urging Herzog and what he called
Speaker 2: law fair against the Prime mister Benjamin Netanyah, who is
Speaker 2: a saint. He's never done anything wrong in his life.
Speaker 2: In fact, he once rescued an entire orphanage that was
Speaker 2: burning down. The orphanage also was full of puppies. So
Speaker 2: that's what he's done. You'd be closer to the truth
Speaker 2: if you said that he did the opposite. It is
Speaker 2: my honor to write to you at this historic time,
Speaker 2: as we have together just secured peace that has been
Speaker 2: sought for at least three thousand years. Trump wrote, thanking
Speaker 2: Herzog and all Israelis for their gracious hospitality, noting he
Speaker 2: was addressing a key theme he raised in his nesset
Speaker 2: remarks as a great state of Israel and amazing Jewish
Speaker 2: people move past the terribly difficult times of the last years.
Speaker 2: Here we are calling you to fully pardon Benjamin Netanyahu,
Speaker 2: who has been a formidable and decisive wartime prime minister.
Speaker 2: He was now leading Israel into a time of peace,
Speaker 2: which includes my continued work with key Middle East leaders
Speaker 2: to add many additional countries to the world changing Abraham Accords.
Speaker 2: That's right, pardon mister Netanyaho. He never did anything wrong.
Speaker 2: He's a good boy, he's our friend. It's truly amazing
Speaker 2: how utterly devoted and sycophantic our politicians are to Israel,
Speaker 2: the going so far as to write letters as to
Speaker 2: push for a pardon for net Yahoo. He can't even
Speaker 2: let this play out in their own country without jumping
Speaker 2: in to stand up for his good buddy. Then ya
Speaker 2: have nothing to see here. There's no reason to assume
Speaker 2: that Israel has undoe in influence on our politicians. We
Speaker 2: simply are involved in their affairs. They are involved in ours,
Speaker 2: apac buys our politicians. Trump is out there campaigning for
Speaker 2: a pardon for the president of Israel. Well, nothing to see,
Speaker 2: nothing to worry about, I am sure. So you have
Speaker 2: a tip, neurodivergent one. Thank you very much does my
Speaker 2: meager contribution for the nights of truth keep fighting a
Speaker 2: good fight. I am forever grateful for all you do.
Speaker 2: God bless Thank you so much, neurodivergent one. It is
Speaker 2: very kind. I appreciate it. Cannot thank you enough. And again,
Speaker 2: just I know I say the same thing every time,
Speaker 2: but thank you, thank you very much. I don't know
Speaker 2: what else to say beyond that. And you all have
Speaker 2: seen so many cool concerts, so many amazing concerts are
Speaker 2: being talked about in chat, and I have the uh,
Speaker 2: never got to see any of the bantage all are
Speaker 2: talking about. I did, however, my first concert, if you
Speaker 2: can believe it was all that remains a story of
Speaker 2: the year past, the day and the Devil Wears Prada.
Speaker 2: That will tell you if you know those bands, you'll
Speaker 2: know exactly what type of show that was.
Speaker 3: It was a lot of fun. It was a lot
Speaker 3: of fun.
Speaker 2: But now never got to see Fish or Sticks any
Speaker 2: of those wonderful classic bands. Sadly, I'm very jealous or envious,
Speaker 2: I should say, I suppose of y'all's experience isn't getting
Speaker 2: to see them. Well, let's keep it moving along with
Speaker 2: the actual news and not me lamenting over the fact
Speaker 2: that I didn't see any of the classic rock bands.
Speaker 2: I actually beside now, ow you know, we're winging it now,
Speaker 2: we're having fun with it. Recently last night, actually I
Speaker 2: discovered that Anthrax did a cover of Kansas's Carry On
Speaker 2: Wayward Sun, and it's fantastic, actually absolutely fantastic, and I
Speaker 2: think I might actually like it a little better than
Speaker 2: the original, which very rarely happens.
Speaker 3: But what can you do.
Speaker 2: Anthrax has an amazing cover of carry On Wayward Son
Speaker 2: in case you didn't know, But for all I know,
Speaker 2: that's common knowledge. And I am just an ignorant, ignorant
Speaker 2: fool when it comes to music. I'm definitely an ignorant
Speaker 2: fool when it comes to music, but maybe not in
Speaker 2: this instance. Anyway, Moving along away from Kansas, we're not
Speaker 2: in Kansas anymore, Bitcoin showing signs of severe collapse, and
Speaker 2: this is something I want to get Tony Ardeban's take
Speaker 2: on when he comes on, because he has far more
Speaker 2: knowledge when it comes to crypto and the economy. Bitcoin
Speaker 2: has fallen fast, hard, and with no clear trigger. The
Speaker 2: og cryptocurrency Bitcoin is having a horrible month. Well get
Speaker 2: in line Bitcoin. The token has wiped out hundreds of
Speaker 2: billions of dollars in total market value, dropping below ninety
Speaker 2: two thousand for the first time since mid April. That's
Speaker 2: despite soaring to an all time high over one hundred
Speaker 2: and twenty six thousand a mere six weeks ago.
Speaker 3: A mere six weeks ago.
Speaker 2: It's been a bruising couple of weeks, and nobody is
Speaker 2: entirely clear on why. Even Bloomberg admitted that Bitcoin has
Speaker 2: fallen fast, hard and with no clear trigger. They don't
Speaker 2: know what's causing it could be anything. When prevailing theory,
Speaker 2: it's economic uncertainty over dwindling hope that the US Federal
Speaker 2: Reserve will lower interest rates next month. Lower rate usually
Speaker 2: leads to increased liquidity and more willingness to invest in
Speaker 2: more risky assets like crypto, and crypto is by nature,
Speaker 2: just the very definition of an intangible asset. It exists
Speaker 2: so long as the grid does.
Speaker 3: If you.
Speaker 2: Again, I'm of the opinion I think you can make
Speaker 2: a lot of money in cryptocurrency. I think if you're
Speaker 2: intelligent with your investing, investing is probably a great way
Speaker 2: to increase your net worth and your income. I don't
Speaker 2: know enough about it to feel comfortable investing or ever
Speaker 2: give investment advice. That is my opinion on it. I
Speaker 2: am sure there are people that do it wonderfully. I'm
Speaker 2: friends with some guys and they invest and they are
Speaker 2: big believers in it, and they're all about it, and
Speaker 2: they seem to be doing very well, and I'm very
Speaker 2: happy for them. But to me, I'm always too nervous
Speaker 2: to ever pull the trigger. It always seems like a
Speaker 2: good way to lose. Always seems like I'm involved with
Speaker 2: some kind of casino. The general market is risk off Bitwise.
Speaker 2: Asset Management Chief investment Officer Matthew Hogan told Bloomberg crypto
Speaker 2: was the canary in the coal mine for that it
Speaker 2: was the first to flinch. Experts say it's likely that
Speaker 2: there are several factors at play. The selloff is a
Speaker 2: confluence of profit taking by long term holders, institutional outflows,
Speaker 2: macro uncertainty, and leveraged longs getting wiped out. Nansen Senior
Speaker 2: research analyst Jake Cannis told Bloomberg what is clear is
Speaker 2: that the market has temporarily chosen a downward direction after
Speaker 2: a long period of consolidation and slash ranging. Paul said,
Speaker 2: investors to question the long held assumption that bitcoin was
Speaker 2: a hedge against inflation, as embac News reports, with the
Speaker 2: Digital Currencies crash, company not defying a larger self in
Speaker 2: the buzzy but tenuous AI market, and of course as
Speaker 2: time goes on, we see more and more people talking
Speaker 2: about the AI bubble and the potential for an AI crash,
Speaker 2: and more and more people are pointing out that it
Speaker 2: mirrors very closely what happened with the dot com bubble
Speaker 2: and then the dot com burst dot com bust. People
Speaker 2: over invested, they were investing in everything. There was just
Speaker 2: capital being thrown at anything, in everything, and someddenly people realize,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, perhaps this wasn't the best idea. That's
Speaker 2: an oversimplification of things. I was very young at the time,
Speaker 2: so I don't have clear memories. I don't remember people
Speaker 2: talking about the exact scenario. But from what I've read
Speaker 2: and seen over the years, this seems to be what happened,
Speaker 2: and it seems to be fairly closely tracking with AI.
Speaker 2: People have been investing in every AI company they can find.
Speaker 2: AI company goes public and there's a line around the
Speaker 2: corner of people waiting to throw their money at them,
Speaker 2: which doesn't seem to be the best idea anymore because
Speaker 2: they're not really delivering returns. Even open AI, even something
Speaker 2: as big as chat GPT, people are looking at it
Speaker 2: and saying, are you guys going to turn a profit?
Speaker 2: And Sam Altman himself got very upset when asked about that.
Speaker 2: Remember we talked about that on the show the other
Speaker 2: day last week. I believe maybe it was longer than
Speaker 2: last week, but Sam Alton was not happy. He said, well,
Speaker 2: you know, if you want to sell your shares to
Speaker 2: the interviewer, I've got we could find someone instantly to
Speaker 2: buy them.
Speaker 3: You don't get upset.
Speaker 2: When someone questions you if you're doing well, if you've
Speaker 2: got nothing to worry about, if you are armed so
Speaker 2: strong in honesty that it passes you by like the
Speaker 2: idle breeze that you heed not. Why get mad about it?
Speaker 2: If you don't have to worry about it, who cares?
Speaker 2: But Sam Altman does have to worry. He is sitting there.
Speaker 3: And people are pointing out.
Speaker 2: Hey, this looks a little funky. And so when you
Speaker 2: do that, you are threatening him his business model. So
Speaker 2: he has to get mad, he has to get upset
Speaker 2: because it is it is a bubble.
Speaker 3: Well, this is.
Speaker 2: Again, We're not going through this in any particular order.
Speaker 3: I'm a bit chaotic today.
Speaker 2: I was up late last night trying to get the
Speaker 2: studio set up done, so I'm all over the place
Speaker 2: and I'm having a great time. But this article is
Speaker 2: from Breitbart, and it is just a bit of fun.
Speaker 2: Chess boxing gaining popularity as a serious sport.
Speaker 3: Isn't that awesome?
Speaker 2: You can play chess and punch people in the face
Speaker 2: at the exact same time. Turns out that chess boxing
Speaker 2: is not only an actual sport, but an actual sport
Speaker 2: that has been gaining actual traction here in the United States. Well,
Speaker 2: this is something I need to get in on right away.
Speaker 2: Chess boxing involves exactly what its name promises. Two players
Speaker 2: spar in the ring for three minutes until the bell rings,
Speaker 2: after which they take off their gloves and go to
Speaker 2: the chess board for a time until they rotate back
Speaker 2: to the ring for another round. The match ends in
Speaker 2: a checkmate, a knockout, or a judge's decision. Now I
Speaker 2: really wonder My theory is that you just find a
Speaker 2: really really good boxer, ignore how good he is at chess,
Speaker 2: and you just go for ko after ko after ko.
Speaker 2: Why bother defeating your opponent intellectually when you can simply
Speaker 2: grind them into the dust. You don't need Magnus Carlson
Speaker 2: but you need. What you need is a Mike Tyson. Simple.
Speaker 2: Everybody's got a plan until you punch them in the face.
Speaker 2: This simplifies everything. Why bother learning to play chess? You
Speaker 2: know what, It doesn't matter if you don't even know
Speaker 2: the names.
Speaker 3: Of the pieces.
Speaker 2: So long as you are simply capable of delivering a
Speaker 2: stronger punch and making sure that your opponent can't play
Speaker 2: the game, you are totally fine. That's what matters here.
Speaker 2: Why complicate things? And this is again just I find
Speaker 2: it utterly absurd and completely hilarious the lengths people are
Speaker 2: going to to stave off boredom. Whether it's the people
Speaker 2: involved with this or the people watching this. We are
Speaker 2: even taking our entertainment to ridiculous levels. It's not simply
Speaker 2: enough anymore to have your sports in separate fashion. No,
Speaker 2: we're going to do chest boxing. I'm, for one, waiting
Speaker 2: for them to do poker knife fighting. I think that
Speaker 2: would be really interesting. Oh he's got a straight flush.
Speaker 2: Oh but he's been stabbed in the kidneys. That's going
Speaker 2: to make it hard to play this next hand. That's
Speaker 2: what I'm waiting for. That's when I'll truly become interested.
Speaker 2: So if anyone out there involved with chess boxing can
Speaker 2: make poker knife fighting a thing, you know, just let
Speaker 2: me know and I'll be your most dedicated you. I promise.
Speaker 2: It is just again the absurd concentration of everything that
Speaker 2: we are involved with, whether it is entertainment or drugs
Speaker 2: or the pornography people consume, it all seems to becoming
Speaker 2: more extreme and more absurd. And I think it's simply
Speaker 2: just because people are empty. The world is becoming more
Speaker 2: screwed up. There's less hope when it comes to anything
Speaker 2: and everything, so people need more and more ridiculous distractions.
Speaker 2: The bread and circuses have to start providing more bread
Speaker 2: and more circus per more concentrated forms. That's what we're
Speaker 2: dealing with here, and it's truly strange to see.
Speaker 3: However, it is funny. It is funny.
Speaker 2: Can't deny chest boxing does sound entertaining, at least half
Speaker 2: of it.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure how people.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's because I'm a big old dumb dumb, but
Speaker 2: chess has never been something I enjoyed watching. You know,
Speaker 2: it's a great it's a great game. Not that I play,
Speaker 2: you know, you have to respect it, but it's just
Speaker 2: it's really it's really two guys sitting there moving little
Speaker 2: pieces around. It's not exactly fascinating to watch. But again,
Speaker 2: that could be because I'm a big old dumb dumb.
Speaker 2: And in just news you didn't see coming, at least
Speaker 2: news I didn't expect. Is Nicki Minaj Nicki Minaj being
Speaker 2: praising Trump for prioritizing Christian persecution in Nigeria. And it's
Speaker 2: just we live in very strange times. On the heading
Speaker 2: of just who expected this?
Speaker 7: Not me?
Speaker 3: How did it become? Just why is she involved with this?
Speaker 2: I not faulting her for it, it's just I cannot
Speaker 2: understand how Nicki Minaj is somehow involved with geopolitics and
Speaker 2: is someone that we are sending to the United Nations
Speaker 2: to give speeches. I truly do not understand the world
Speaker 2: we live in anymore. Rat Megastar Nicki Minaj praised Donald
Speaker 2: Trump for prioritizing this year of the persecution and slaughter
Speaker 2: of Christians in Nigeria and thanked him for his leadership
Speaker 2: on the global stage and calling for actions on this
Speaker 2: issue again just.
Speaker 4: Very soon.
Speaker 3: I truly do not.
Speaker 2: Understand how these people become involved with these things, and
Speaker 2: perhaps that is my fault, but who knows? And that
Speaker 2: is just under the heading of who saw this coming?
Speaker 2: We also have a Billie Eilish and Elon Musk feud,
Speaker 2: which again this is under the heading of well who
Speaker 2: really cares? Elon Musk mocks Billy Eilish after she called
Speaker 2: him a pathetic a couple of words followed by the
Speaker 2: word coward. She's not the sharpest tool in the shed,
Speaker 2: was Elon Musk's mocking retort, What is Zinger not the
Speaker 2: sharpest tool in the shed? Being the smartest man on
Speaker 2: the planet, allegedly, he's not very entertaining or rhetorically effective.
Speaker 2: Every time you hear Elon Musk speak, it's pretty boring, uninteresting,
Speaker 2: which is very strange for the world's smartest man. Eilish
Speaker 2: single must out at the recent Wall Street Journal Innovator Awards,
Speaker 2: using her acceptance speech to castigate billionaires for allegedly hoarding
Speaker 2: their wealth when people need empathy and help more than
Speaker 2: kind of like ever, especially in our country.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 2: The singer further shared several Instagram stories from My Voice,
Speaker 2: My Choice detailing the many world issues Elon Musk could
Speaker 2: solve with his vast wealth if only he gave it
Speaker 2: to others, as directed by her. That's right, if you
Speaker 2: were to just turn over your money to these people,
Speaker 2: they would absolutely know what to do with it, how
Speaker 2: to fix everything.
Speaker 3: Just turn it over.
Speaker 2: And you know, we're not any fans of Elon Musk here,
Speaker 2: but this is part of the reason why so many
Speaker 2: people are desperate, to desperate to defend Elon and Trump
Speaker 2: because of the enemies they have, because it's these privileged
Speaker 2: know nothings and I have. Privilege is such a charge
Speaker 2: toward nowadays because of who generally uses it. But Billie
Speaker 2: Eilish is wealthy by the vast majority of standards. She
Speaker 2: is most likely a multi millionaire Billy Eilish could probably
Speaker 2: afford to never take another dime from royalties and instead
Speaker 2: send all of that to a charity that's actually going
Speaker 2: to fix the world's problems, like she says. But instead
Speaker 2: she's not doing that, is she. No, Now, she's probably
Speaker 2: going to increase for spending when it comes to her
Speaker 2: lifestyle needs, because that's generally what happens. People don't tend
Speaker 2: to cut back. They tend to grow their expenses as
Speaker 2: their income grows. And so people can see this Billie
Speaker 2: Eilish Taylor Swift jet setting around the world in her
Speaker 2: multimillion dollar jet, people like Al Gore lecturing us all
Speaker 2: on the climate agenda as he's a multi millionaire. It
Speaker 2: is just this level of hypocrisy that people see and
Speaker 2: it makes them desperate to defend Well, look look who
Speaker 2: their enemies are. Look at this Billie Eilish character making
Speaker 2: fun of Elon Musk. I've got to defend him. And yeah,
Speaker 2: Billie Eilish is annoying. Yeah she's ridiculous. Yeah she's a hypocrite.
Speaker 2: That doesn't make Elon Musk a savior. That doesn't mean
Speaker 2: he's a hero. It doesn't mean he's a good person.
Speaker 2: But that's why so many people just immediately knee jerk
Speaker 2: reaction want to defend them, because the Left has been
Speaker 2: so obnoxious and obviously obviously hypocriteticle for so long that
Speaker 2: that's just what happens. They immediately just need to defend them.
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break and we will
Speaker 2: be right back.
Speaker 4: You're listening to the David Knight Show. You're listening to
Speaker 4: the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: But this article comes from responsible state craft Pompeo to
Speaker 2: advise Ukraine weapons company accused of corruption. Surprise, the former
Speaker 2: Trump official who makes full throated arguments for more ade
Speaker 2: Kiev now stands to benefit directly from endless war. There,
Speaker 2: What a shocker. Who could have seen that coming? Isn't
Speaker 2: that a surprise? I don't think it's really a surprise
Speaker 2: to anyone that's paying attention. That is simply business as usual.
Speaker 2: You can see good old Pompeo there at the top
Speaker 2: of the article, quickly rising to prominence in wartime. Firepoint
Speaker 2: is currently under scrutiny for its alleged price gouging practices
Speaker 2: and for its ties to Timer mindis a Zelenski associate
Speaker 2: being investigated for corruption charges also charged that the company
Speaker 2: has an unfair monopoly over the drone market, earning about
Speaker 2: one billion this year. Firepoint is now constructing a factory
Speaker 2: in Denmark. Pompeo's new role continues a pattern of reported
Speaker 2: wartime conflict of interest. R supported last summer that Pompeo's
Speaker 2: took to benefit from the Trump peace plan he proposed
Speaker 2: in The Wall Street Journal, which called for Ukraine to
Speaker 2: join the EU for a five hundred billion dollar lend
Speaker 2: lease program for Ukraine to buy US weapons. As a
Speaker 2: director at prominent Ukrainian telecom company Gibstar, Pompeo would have
Speaker 2: stood to gain from the economic benefits Gebstar realized the
Speaker 2: Ukraine's view ascension had his peace plan been realized. And
Speaker 2: of course this is more of the same. This is
Speaker 2: exactly what the US always does, its war profiteering. I'm
Speaker 2: going to make money on all sides.
Speaker 3: Tony is.
Speaker 2: Just text me. He says he is having issues with Zoom.
Speaker 2: He may not be able to join us. And I
Speaker 2: completely understand. Technology is a pickle pickle master. It works
Speaker 2: when it wants to. And that is that is the delicacy,
Speaker 2: the delicacy of the grid that we all deal with here,
Speaker 2: isn't that? That's just how it is. We all are
Speaker 2: at the mercy of technology these days. We're going to
Speaker 2: continue to try to connect with Tony. If it happens fantastic,
Speaker 2: we will get him on and we will discuss gold
Speaker 2: and silver. If not, I understand, and we will continue
Speaker 2: on with the show. I think I forgot to mention
Speaker 2: this earlier, but I do have an interview that I'm
Speaker 2: going to play for you in the third hour. It
Speaker 2: is the interview that my dad did with Zoe Smith,
Speaker 2: the medical whistleblower. It's a good interview and it is
Speaker 2: worth watching in case you haven't seen it. I would
Speaker 2: like to use interviews during these I like to use
Speaker 2: interviews for rebroadcasts because a lot of people may not
Speaker 2: have seen them, and they always provide such fantastic information.
Speaker 2: Like I said, with this Pompeo, this is more of
Speaker 2: the same. This is we're profiteering, and they are utterly
Speaker 2: shameless about it at this point. Yeah, we're gonna make
Speaker 2: money off this. What are you gonna do to stop us?
Speaker 2: Raytheon needs another few hundred billion dollars, don't you know?
Speaker 2: And if the cost is a few hundred, few thousand,
Speaker 2: few hundred thousand dead, Who cares, what does it matter?
Speaker 2: Doesn't matter to raytheon and that's that's fine by them.
Speaker 3: All right.
Speaker 2: Well, we'll move along from Pompeo. Take a look at
Speaker 2: this article from RT and it says French jets. French
Speaker 2: jets won't help Ukraine, and this is coming from the Kremlin.
Speaker 2: Ukraine's potential purchase of French made Rafale fighter jets will
Speaker 2: not alter the situation on the battlefield in Kiev's in
Speaker 2: Kiev's favor, Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov said on Tuesday. And
Speaker 2: of course it's not just a matter of the jets.
Speaker 2: This article also goes on to point this out, but
Speaker 2: you can have all the gear and tech in the world,
Speaker 2: but if you don't have the people to man them
Speaker 2: and fly them or utilize them, it doesn't matter. You
Speaker 2: can reduce the number of people you need, you know,
Speaker 2: working towards drone warfare and all that, but if Kiev
Speaker 2: does not have the fighter pilots, then these fighter jets
Speaker 2: don't do them any good. And in this article it
Speaker 2: details how like, yeah, we're actually going to train the
Speaker 2: Ukrainians on it and it's a ten year plan. Ten
Speaker 2: year plan. How long do they think this war is
Speaker 2: going to drag on? How long do they think it
Speaker 2: will continue? That is another just sign that they don't
Speaker 2: intend this to ever stop. Now we're going to continue
Speaker 2: this forever and ever and ever endless war. Isn't that wonderful?
Speaker 2: We're going to take a quick break. I've got a
Speaker 2: couple more tech issues to sort out and hopefully we'll
Speaker 2: be back at full strength when I return.
Speaker 4: Stay with us, Jordan listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 2: Well, welcome back, folks, and joining me now is Tony Arderburn.
Speaker 2: We have foiled the plots of the technological assassins. We're
Speaker 2: back online, So thank you for joining me today, Tony.
Speaker 3: Ex exactly exactly.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you again for joining us, and I just
Speaker 2: want to get your take on what's going on with
Speaker 2: the gold and silver markets as well as crypto. People
Speaker 2: are starting to worry about Bitcoin. They looking at it saying, actually,
Speaker 2: you know, it's kind of crashing right now, and we
Speaker 2: don't know why. We don't understand it, No one really does,
Speaker 2: but it's it seems to be crashing, And isn't that odd?
Speaker 3: Isn't that strange. I don't think it's that strange.
Speaker 10: Honestly, it's a supply issue with bitcoin, and there's not
Speaker 10: a lot of supply. I mean, the exchanges have somewhere
Speaker 10: around two million bitcoin tops and as supposed to be
Speaker 10: like a twenty one million supply, but that's really on
Speaker 10: about sixteen million.
Speaker 3: So I think what you're watching is a shakeout.
Speaker 10: And I think this I'm not alone on this, but
Speaker 10: as far as what's happening with bitcoin, I think it's
Speaker 10: a manufactured There are market conditions for liquidation as we
Speaker 10: reached the all time high in October and there was
Speaker 10: a big sell off from some older wallets and people
Speaker 10: that have held individuals have held for a long time.
Speaker 10: But the metrics still are true and less and less
Speaker 10: individuals have just one bitcoin, Travis. It is less than
Speaker 10: eight hundred and fifty thousand people around the world hold
Speaker 10: at least one bitcoin, and that number is shrinking because
Speaker 10: of institutions. So if you ask me, and this is
Speaker 10: also something that's happening I think on the gold and
Speaker 10: silver realm is that regular people are being shaken out
Speaker 10: of their bitcoin so that whales and institutions can gobble
Speaker 10: it up.
Speaker 3: And I think.
Speaker 10: You know, you go back to when Larry Fink from
Speaker 10: Blackrock goes to Davos, goes to the World Economic Forum
Speaker 10: last year and says, hey, a bitcoin is going to
Speaker 10: go to seven hundred thousand, and I thought, wow, that's
Speaker 10: at the time. If you overlaid that price for bitcoin,
Speaker 10: it would be the exact market cap for what gold
Speaker 10: was at the time. And Larry Fink's not a fan
Speaker 10: of gold. Lack Rock is not a fan of gold,
Speaker 10: a physical gold, because he believes it disrupts the financial system.
Speaker 10: That same thing that the European Central Bank set about
Speaker 10: gold this last year is that gold is a threat
Speaker 10: to the economic order.
Speaker 2: Because if there's ever an endorsement for gold, it's someone
Speaker 2: like Larry Fink coming out and saying no, I don't
Speaker 2: like that stuff.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: If you ever needed a sign, it's Larry Fink. And
Speaker 2: to be clear, he's talking about physical gold.
Speaker 10: Yeah, yeah, Larry Fink was talking about physical gold and
Speaker 10: silver and the thought it disrupted developing nations. What does
Speaker 10: that even mean? I think, I think what you you
Speaker 10: know we're watching here is a shakeout because there is
Speaker 10: a hard cap limited supply of bitcoin. And yeah, you
Speaker 10: can manipulate it in some ways, but at the end
Speaker 10: of the day, there's only supposed to be twenty one
Speaker 10: million in the system, and again there's less than that
Speaker 10: because you've got Satoshi's wallets and the millions of bitcoin
Speaker 10: that are lost forever and landfills or what have you.
Speaker 10: So I think that's I think that's what we're watching,
Speaker 10: and that's not me being bullish on bitcoin and telling
Speaker 10: you it's going to be two hundred thousand by the
Speaker 10: end of the year or some crazy thing. It may
Speaker 10: crash further, and it may crash further for this exact reason.
Speaker 10: I think when if you look at if you just
Speaker 10: do the math a year from now and we do
Speaker 10: the same metrics, less individuals will hold at least one bitcoin,
Speaker 10: and more institutions will hold more.
Speaker 2: I've also, as you say, you know, people are being
Speaker 2: forced out, and that seems to be the way everything
Speaker 2: goes nowadays.
Speaker 3: You know, whether it's.
Speaker 2: Black Rock buying up houses or this happening with bitcoin.
Speaker 2: The average person is just being forced out of basically
Speaker 2: every market. The only thing that you're going to be
Speaker 2: allowed to buy, it seems, is consumer goods, and even
Speaker 2: then the prices are going up so dramatically on that
Speaker 2: that you.
Speaker 3: Can't even have forward.
Speaker 2: Those things, your you know, little playthings that make your
Speaker 2: slavery somewhat bearable are getting removed from you. Just like, no,
Speaker 2: well you can't have a house, but you can enjoy
Speaker 2: your video games. Well, now we took the video games
Speaker 2: and we made them lame and gay.
Speaker 3: You can't have that.
Speaker 2: The movies are lame and gay, can't have that. Just
Speaker 2: every single thing, even the distractions, are being peeled away
Speaker 2: at this point, and we're kind of facing down to
Speaker 2: the barrel of just this, the coming.
Speaker 3: Hardships, as it were.
Speaker 2: And I've also been curious of how much of this
Speaker 2: is you know, maybe like you said, you know, the
Speaker 2: people who own just one singular bitcoin or small portions
Speaker 2: of it as an investment, Like I don't have enough
Speaker 2: income coming in, I have to sell out. The economy
Speaker 2: is so bad that I just need an infusion of
Speaker 2: cash right now. I need to have some money. How
Speaker 2: much of this is that? And you know, there's no
Speaker 2: real way to quantify that. It's simply speculation on my part,
Speaker 2: but it does seem like it's a possibility that things
Speaker 2: are just expensive, that the economy is bad, that people
Speaker 2: are jobless, and these guys that were you know, oh,
Speaker 2: I'm gonna hold, I'm gonna hold, I'm gonna hold. Have
Speaker 2: each point where it's just well, I can't anymore.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 2: If it's between me selling my bitcoin, which may eventually
Speaker 2: make me rich, or me starving right now and losing
Speaker 2: my house, that's an easy choice to make. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's not easy, but there's an obvious answer to it,
Speaker 2: just like well, I guess, I guess the bitcoin has
Speaker 2: to go, and it's just yeah, Blackrock never has to
Speaker 2: make that kind of choice. Blackrock has an infinite supply
Speaker 2: of money. They can hold bitcoin as the world burns
Speaker 2: around them forever and it'll be fine.
Speaker 3: And it's just.
Speaker 2: Again, this is why, yeah, this is why again, just
Speaker 2: the volatility of crypto has always been why I thought
Speaker 2: for the you know, I thought it was funny as
Speaker 2: a meme, which is why again, I'm sure you've heard
Speaker 2: the story I bought dog coin.
Speaker 3: I bought a bunch of it when it.
Speaker 2: Was really really cheap, because like, oh it's dog I'll
Speaker 2: buy one hundred dollars of it, and now it'll be
Speaker 2: a good funny story. You know, I don't have any
Speaker 2: expenses one hundred dollars. That's nothing at that time, and
Speaker 2: then it goes to the moon and I'm one of
Speaker 2: the idiots that lost my password of course, so that's
Speaker 2: a that's a fortune gone.
Speaker 3: Yeah, easy come, easy go. Well, don't feel so bad.
Speaker 10: I remember I bought my first bitcoin ATM and I
Speaker 10: was broke. I mean, I saw people using it at
Speaker 10: one of my family's convenience stores. We had somebody leasing
Speaker 10: a space, and I said, what is that?
Speaker 3: And I go.
Speaker 10: I knew what bitcoin was, so I go and buy
Speaker 10: a little bit of bitcoin, and I realized it was
Speaker 10: trading for three hundred and eighty dollars. So instead of
Speaker 10: buying the bitcoin, I boughtcoin ATMs because I wanted to
Speaker 10: be a retailer. This is just bought the bitcoin. Could
Speaker 10: have done far better. So you're not You're not alone.
Speaker 10: And I think of all the bitcoin that's passed through
Speaker 10: my hands, you know, through my business. So no, there's
Speaker 10: no way to know, you know, you can't see the
Speaker 10: future that you know. Bitcoin again, was it twenty seventeen
Speaker 10: hit at the end of the year's twenty five thousand
Speaker 10: and twenty twenty one sixty some one thousand and crashed again.
Speaker 10: I was at the Bitcoin conference in Nashville in twenty
Speaker 10: four it was trading at sixty three thousand. I decided
Speaker 10: to buy more with my company daily after that, and
Speaker 10: of course one hundred thousand by the end of twenty
Speaker 10: four then what we've been kind of flat.
Speaker 3: We hit an all time high in October.
Speaker 10: But I think it's I think this is another push
Speaker 10: to separate regular people from assets. Travis, and by the way,
Speaker 10: bitcoins not alone in this. I'm seeing massive liquidations of silver,
Speaker 10: and people come into my shops, both in Texas and
Speaker 10: Missouri and they're like, hey, can I get cash, and like,
Speaker 10: what's really hard for me to do that? Everybody's selling
Speaker 10: me stuff and then there's almost no buyers, so I
Speaker 10: have to sell, especially the large orders I have to
Speaker 10: take to the trading house, and it takes up to
Speaker 10: two weeks to get paid.
Speaker 3: Now that silver floating.
Speaker 10: Up to something else, and that's of course the goal too,
Speaker 10: But I'm seeing that more and more and more in
Speaker 10: these massive liquidations from regular people. Because you're right that
Speaker 10: the economy is very weak. Inflation is eaten into metastasizing
Speaker 10: into everything that we do, driving prices up, weakening the dollar,
Speaker 10: weakening your savings, causing shortfalls, and so I see that
Speaker 10: everyday people's selling and it's going to institutions. Kiko had
Speaker 10: a great article it's up right now. It's the silver
Speaker 10: has its fifth annual supply deficit. So it's like, you know,
Speaker 10: two three hundred million ounces of supply deficit a year,
Speaker 10: which means the above ground supply has to be taken
Speaker 10: from in order to fuel just development and whether you
Speaker 10: know it's technological or medical or monetary or whatever it is.
Speaker 10: So there's not enough mining going on. So same thing
Speaker 10: with bitcoin. It's it's you know, it is a magic
Speaker 10: trick in so many ways. And I think that's what
Speaker 10: in my opinion, and it's a contrarian opinion, but I
Speaker 10: think that regular people being shaken out of assets right
Speaker 10: now so that the super elite can because who wants
Speaker 10: to buy stocks? Who wants to go into this? Yeah
Speaker 10: you really want to go into this like one hundred
Speaker 10: times earning over leverage zombie corporation, you know, wasteland?
Speaker 3: I don't think so.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I talked briefly about investing earlier, and the only thing
Speaker 2: I could say is, you know, I have no advice
Speaker 2: to give on it. I personally don't invest because you know,
Speaker 2: the market doesn't seem to play fair. I know guys
Speaker 2: who are big on investing, and they seem to be
Speaker 2: doing well for themselves. And there are guys that swear
Speaker 2: by you know, oh, I invest in these specific companies
Speaker 2: and I get a return, and you know that's great
Speaker 2: for them. I'm happy for them, you know, I want
Speaker 2: them to succeed. I want them to be able to
Speaker 2: build a nest egg. It's just investing has always been
Speaker 2: something that I've leary of. It's always felt to me
Speaker 2: like I'm walking into a casino and I can't see
Speaker 2: the sucker at the table, which means surprise, surprise.
Speaker 3: It's me. You know, when you're.
Speaker 2: Betting, when you've got black Rock on one side of
Speaker 2: you and Vanguard on the other and you're sitting in
Speaker 2: between them, like, oh boy, I'm sure going to play
Speaker 2: at this table with these guys, so you're probably not
Speaker 2: making it out of there alive, Like there's sharks in
Speaker 2: these waters. The market isn't fair, you know, at any time.
Speaker 3: It's rigged at the top, and it's rigged.
Speaker 10: It's rigged through tech technology, it's rigged through I mean
Speaker 10: nanoseconds of trading prior to I mean, if there's a
Speaker 10: big push for a stock, I was just listening to
Speaker 10: a podcast on this that's breaking it down.
Speaker 3: I think they had a sixty minutes report on it.
Speaker 10: It was just basically the the AI that's built into it.
Speaker 10: Now it's hard to find value. So if you, by
Speaker 10: the way, I'm all for investing, and I think you're right, people, are.
Speaker 2: You lost connection with Tony briefly? Hopefully it reconnects window.
Speaker 2: I mean, I'm going to look at something. It's going
Speaker 2: to be fears we lost you briefly. Would you go
Speaker 2: back just about, you know, ten seconds and recap what
Speaker 2: you just said.
Speaker 3: I was just I'm saying I'm a trader. I'm not
Speaker 3: a day trader.
Speaker 10: I'm an entrepreneur, and I would I have a longer,
Speaker 10: much longer window, much longer horizon than what's going to
Speaker 10: happen tomorrow. I'm more like, hey, what's going to happen
Speaker 10: three and five years out? So I'm all for you know,
Speaker 10: I'm all for investment, but I just and then there's
Speaker 10: people that do really well, so I don't want to
Speaker 10: take that away from them. But personally me, I look
Speaker 10: at this and it's a it's a clown show, you
Speaker 10: know when it comes to finance, and it's just mean,
Speaker 10: fiat currency is failing all around the world, So what
Speaker 10: are you pricing these stocks? And I mean, if you
Speaker 10: really if you take the stocks in the S and
Speaker 10: P five hundred and everything else, and you look at
Speaker 10: what the performance against inflation, it's not great. It's not
Speaker 10: like it didn't do as well as you think it did.
Speaker 10: It just looks that way because you've got these you know,
Speaker 10: ten extras or whatever it is. Well, if your currency's failing,
Speaker 10: you didn't really increase, you just outpaced inflation, or maybe
Speaker 10: you're neutral. Well that's what gold and silver do, and
Speaker 10: theoretically that's what bitcoin is supposed to do. It's bitcoins
Speaker 10: having a bad run in the last nine months or so,
Speaker 10: and then again could be manufactured so they can reset
Speaker 10: this thing. I don't think that black rock is going
Speaker 10: to be denied its return.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're not going to take black rocks a birthright
Speaker 2: from it. Its birthright is apparently the entire world. They're
Speaker 2: going to buy it all eventually and nothing will stand
Speaker 2: in their way. I want to ask, what's on your
Speaker 2: radar with gold and silver. We talked about how what
Speaker 2: you said that article from Kitko where silver faces fifth
Speaker 2: annual supply deficit. What else is going on with gold
Speaker 2: and silver?
Speaker 3: And what do you have going on at wise.
Speaker 2: Wolf Gold, And of course you can go to David
Speaker 2: Knight dot gold if you guys want.
Speaker 3: To pick up some gold or silver. Well, I think
Speaker 3: what we talked about earlier.
Speaker 2: Is we're having connection issues. Tony is frozen again, but
Speaker 2: he will be right back and we'll continue to talk
Speaker 2: about what's going on with gold and silver. But again
Speaker 2: I'm going to David Knight dot gold to get yourself So.
Speaker 3: Those both ways. So I don't want to say sorry,
Speaker 3: I don't interrupt you again, Tony, but you froze for
Speaker 3: a minute. I really yeah, But if you.
Speaker 2: Again just go back about ten seconds and recap, that'd
Speaker 2: be great.
Speaker 10: Sure, well, I would just encourage people if you're again,
Speaker 10: I'd love to buy people's silver and buy people's gold
Speaker 10: that we make a living off that. But I am
Speaker 10: concerned that the average person is being stripped of their
Speaker 10: physical precious metals in this time, and there's there's a
Speaker 10: there's a transfer of wealth happening, and I know people
Speaker 10: need to sell again. That's how I make a living
Speaker 10: off this. It's counterintuitive for me to even say, like
Speaker 10: hold your product like it's you should hold that gold
Speaker 10: and silver as long as you can, and sometimes you can't.
Speaker 10: Sometimes I have to liquidate because of cast positions and
Speaker 10: cash flow.
Speaker 3: So I understand it.
Speaker 10: But I think the most important thing to watch this
Speaker 10: is big picture macro stuff, Travis. But the it's flowing
Speaker 10: upwards to institutions, large holders, investment capital, way past the
Speaker 10: average person, and it's going to drive you know, the
Speaker 10: price is being driven by consumption, Okay, this basic economics.
Speaker 10: Somebody's consuming it. Somebody's consuming the gold, somebody's consuming the silver.
Speaker 10: And then there's also the uncertainty in the markets, you know,
Speaker 10: the fear, uncertainty in doubt. And like your dad said,
Speaker 10: it's the it's the FED and the FUD that that
Speaker 10: drive this. And the FED is gonna You think you
Speaker 10: think we're you think we've seen gold and silver prices
Speaker 10: spike recently, Wait till next year. Holy moly, did you
Speaker 10: see the the.
Speaker 3: The cover of the Economist magazine?
Speaker 7: No? I did not this.
Speaker 10: Rothschild, Oh Rothschild, you know controlled and they're the main
Speaker 10: owners of the Economist magazine's Surprise Surprise, But you should
Speaker 10: look at there's a headline up on Drudge about the
Speaker 10: cover of it's just famine, pestilence, and war predicted for
Speaker 10: twenty twenty six, predictive programming stuff of which you know
Speaker 10: they would be delighted if that all kicks off, because
Speaker 10: you know, they fund both sides, all these these the
Speaker 10: super elite. We know this story, and they'd like to
Speaker 10: for you to have this dark view, the obleik view
Speaker 10: of the future.
Speaker 3: It doesn't have to be that way, but that's what's
Speaker 3: going on.
Speaker 10: We're we're being you know, shaken out of our positions,
Speaker 10: and there's a transfer of wealth happening right now, the
Speaker 10: likes of which I don't think has ever been seen before.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's I think when you say, you know, it's
Speaker 2: never been seen before. It never before has so much
Speaker 2: wealth been so intangible and liquid.
Speaker 3: So much of it is just you know, ethereal.
Speaker 2: And when someone is doesn't physically hold their wealth, it's
Speaker 2: a lot easier to siphon it off of them. You know,
Speaker 2: these assets just you know, they vanish overnight sometimes oh whoops.
Speaker 2: You know, even you know, the dollar you can be
Speaker 2: soon with inflation, but at least then you have the
Speaker 2: physical thing. Whereas stocks, you know, they're not real. You
Speaker 2: don't actually own a piece of that company. Like you
Speaker 2: can't go in and say, well, I would like my
Speaker 2: value in whatever materials you have here. If you show
Speaker 2: up with a piece of paper, they're going to laugh
Speaker 2: you out of the room. Like if the company goes
Speaker 2: to zero, you're not going to be like, well, can
Speaker 2: I at least get my value in steel whatever the
Speaker 2: building is. And it's just people are it's so easy
Speaker 2: to take people for absolutely everything when everything is being
Speaker 2: traded on and you're like, oh, well, you know, we're
Speaker 2: going to repackage these subprime assets and someone else will
Speaker 2: buy it, and then someone else repackages that and sells
Speaker 2: it on down the line, and it's just this continual
Speaker 2: you know, everything just gets shakier and shakeier. And as
Speaker 2: someone who you know, doesn't have a huge background this,
Speaker 2: every time I look at the economy, I just get
Speaker 2: uneasy because I truly do not understand how it hasn't
Speaker 2: all come tumbling down. You know, as a layman you
Speaker 2: look at it and go, surely this this house of cards,
Speaker 2: Like it's like it's almost like it's levitating.
Speaker 3: You know, there's no bottom wrong.
Speaker 2: The House of Cards is just there in space and
Speaker 2: you're looking at it's like, that's not right now.
Speaker 3: Something is wrong here.
Speaker 2: The laws of physics, the rules of the world aren't
Speaker 2: applying for some reason. And I don't know, you know,
Speaker 2: it's like my dad always says, why Ley Coyote has
Speaker 2: run out off the cliff and he just hasn't looked
Speaker 2: down yet. All it takes is someone to look down
Speaker 2: and say, oh, no, oh, I've made a mistake, and
Speaker 2: then everything goes At least that's the way it seems
Speaker 2: to me. But because again you've got these players like
Speaker 2: Black Rock or Vanguard, and guys like Larry Think in
Speaker 2: charge of them. Who knows how long they can sustain
Speaker 2: this unreality. They've got billions or trillions of dollars at
Speaker 2: their disposal, and as such, maybe the rules don't apply.
Speaker 2: Maybe they can string this on forever. Maybe they can. Yeah,
Speaker 2: maybe we'll all be living in palaces of gold one
Speaker 2: day thanks to them. But I'm not holding my breath.
Speaker 10: I think you've got a great point there, and you
Speaker 10: look at the actual metrics of the world economy and
Speaker 10: this is something that I first saw like just to
Speaker 10: displayed in Nashville last year with Michael Saylor and he
Speaker 10: was given a presentation and I thought, I've never never
Speaker 10: seen it put that way, and it was just blocks.
Speaker 10: I've talked about this many times, but it was like
Speaker 10: blocks and blocks of where on this graph on this
Speaker 10: giant screen, and it was like, you know, sovereign wealth funds,
Speaker 10: real estate, you know, stock, stock markets, it has where
Speaker 10: all the wealth in the world supposedly is that you
Speaker 10: like you mentioned it's liquid, right, and it was it
Speaker 10: was like beyond like six hundred trillion or whatever it is.
Speaker 3: And then it shows like these.
Speaker 10: Tiny little boxes over on the left hand side in
Speaker 10: the corner and it was gold, silver, and bitcoin like
Speaker 10: of course gold like over a twenty trillion market cap
Speaker 10: now and I think bitcoins like two it's lost two trillion,
Speaker 10: another two trillion, something like that in a sea of
Speaker 10: hundreds supposedly hundreds of trillions, and the actual like finite
Speaker 10: money is only like a couple that doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 10: And that's why I think there's something going on now.
Speaker 10: A lot of this stuff that isn't real being liquidated
Speaker 10: or repurposed into the real and meanwhile the economy is
Speaker 10: in the tank. I mean, it's it's only propped up
Speaker 10: because they just run the printing press, Travis. I mean
Speaker 10: that's if you look at December first, is when officially
Speaker 10: the FED is going to stop quantitative tightening, which have
Speaker 10: they you know, I don't know what kind of good
Speaker 10: they've actually done. They've raised interest rates to a lot
Speaker 10: and then they've read you know, lowered them again. So
Speaker 10: that supposedly December first, quantative tightening, the policy of it stops,
Speaker 10: and then Drome pals out and I think after that,
Speaker 10: I think the money printer go burr.
Speaker 3: That's what I think.
Speaker 10: I think they do that until the system resets and
Speaker 10: all bets are off on what pricing is. I think
Speaker 10: it's gonna it's going to be a different, uh currency system.
Speaker 10: Currencies are failing around the world. This is a currency issue.
Speaker 7: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I saw an article and I don't know how I
Speaker 2: didn't grab it. I thought I did, but it just
Speaker 2: you know, Trump saying, oh, I want to fire Drome Palell.
Speaker 2: I'd love to fire him, and just uh, you know,
Speaker 2: the FED saying I want to fire the FED chair. Oh,
Speaker 2: would be great to do that, and Breitbart was reporting
Speaker 2: on it without any real commentary on it. They didn't
Speaker 2: point out the fact that, well, he can't fire the
Speaker 2: FED Chair, can he? And I don't know how much
Speaker 2: of that is just an assumption on their part that,
Speaker 2: you know, oh, their audience knows that the FED Chair
Speaker 2: is not beholden to the president and you know, doesn't
Speaker 2: have to answer to anyone in government, or how much
Speaker 2: of that is just wanting to, you know, give Trump
Speaker 2: this aura of always a tough guy. Look how he's
Speaker 2: talking to the FED Chair. Look at what he's doing. Oh,
Speaker 2: I'd love to fire that guy. Maybe he's gonna do it,
Speaker 2: except he can't. He can't. He's the FED Chair gets
Speaker 2: to sit there and do whatever he wants, and the
Speaker 2: President is just gonna twiddle his thumbs and pretend to
Speaker 2: be a tough guy.
Speaker 3: But you'd get a fire Fauci too. Yeah, don't forget that.
Speaker 2: You didn't fire Fauci, all these guys that did so
Speaker 2: much for the American people, such wonderful fellas Donald Trump.
Speaker 10: Rightbart didn't run it through its tel Aviv filter. You know,
Speaker 10: It's like, right Bart just gets you to the edge
Speaker 10: of what the thing is and then they're just like, ah,
Speaker 10: you know, they just kind of leave you. It's so
Speaker 10: you know, it's so funny. Love, those of those outlets
Speaker 10: are the same way. And you're absolutely right. What does
Speaker 10: that say about the presidency? What does that say about
Speaker 10: who runs this country? You're talking about? You have the
Speaker 10: you have literally someone follows the president around with us
Speaker 10: with a briefcase handcuff to them. It's called the football.
Speaker 10: It has the launch codes for nuclear weapons. But you
Speaker 10: can't fire the head of the Central Bank.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it seems to me we have all the worst
Speaker 2: elements of, you know, an authoritarian regime without any of
Speaker 2: the benefits, the alleged benefits that people talk about of Well,
Speaker 2: you can have decisive action. You got one guy that's
Speaker 2: in control, and he makes the choices and his word
Speaker 2: is law, and when he says, you know, jump, everyone.
Speaker 3: Says how high.
Speaker 2: Trump just kind of meanders around and sets terrible precedents
Speaker 2: that someone else will come in and abuse later and
Speaker 2: then just wanders off. And he was like, oh, well,
Speaker 2: I would have loved to have done something, but you know,
Speaker 2: what can I do? Just well, you know, if you
Speaker 2: really were this tough guy that you're talking about, if
Speaker 2: you really were the guy that people seem to think
Speaker 2: you are when you have marched the Marines into the
Speaker 2: FED offices and frog marched everyone off and just been like, well,
Speaker 2: you know, you guys have admitted to tanking the economy
Speaker 2: on multiple occasions, and sure you keep promising, well we
Speaker 2: learned our lesson, we won't do it again, we promise
Speaker 2: this time.
Speaker 3: But you have that. That's how you know.
Speaker 10: That's how you know it's a pageant because uh, that's
Speaker 10: national security. By the way, I mean, what other what
Speaker 10: other priority and nationals other than a direct imminent threat
Speaker 10: would be It'd be your money. Your money is the
Speaker 10: number one priority to protect. Would be the functioning of
Speaker 10: your economy, the actual the lifeblood of it, and right
Speaker 10: now it's poisoned. Yeah, so like the near fact that
Speaker 10: you don't do anything about it anyway, Well, and we'll
Speaker 10: look back and I think Jerome Powell will be seen
Speaker 10: as a very moderate, uh player in all this. It's
Speaker 10: a very moderate you know, not on the fringes, not crazy,
Speaker 10: because I think what they're going to do in twenty
Speaker 10: twenty six is going to dwarf all past experiences with
Speaker 10: what the FED does and the linkage between the Treasury
Speaker 10: and the Fed, not that they're that unlinked, but I
Speaker 10: think it'll just be a fusion. You won't know where
Speaker 10: one begins in the other ends at the after next year,
Speaker 10: and then it'll just be I think that's that's when
Speaker 10: we're headed to the finish line of twenty thirty.
Speaker 2: At that point, I'm so excited for the new hybrid
Speaker 2: tyrannies they're working on. You know, the old tyrannies are
Speaker 2: just so passe and boring. Now I really need a
Speaker 2: chimera tyranny to come in and ruin my life. It's
Speaker 2: not enough for the old ones at this point. So,
Speaker 2: like I said, what have you got going on at
Speaker 2: wise wolf Gold and what's.
Speaker 3: Going on with Wolfpack?
Speaker 2: I know you've been, you know, working like a dog constantly,
Speaker 2: just trying to keep things, you know, running smoothly for
Speaker 2: the people who subscribed to wolf Pack.
Speaker 3: How's that going? It's going well.
Speaker 10: I mean, I'm it's a It's a job that I'm
Speaker 10: born to do, so I love it, and I do
Speaker 10: get kind of sideways because I go back and forth
Speaker 10: between Texas and Missouri and it's like a supply thing
Speaker 10: and getting stuff back and forth.
Speaker 3: I'm in Texas right now. But no, I love it.
Speaker 3: And I think as long.
Speaker 10: As we can keep the the supply you know, rolling
Speaker 10: in and it's not flowing up to these faceless, soulless
Speaker 10: giant corporations, don't don't do that people.
Speaker 3: I think it's a limited supply by the way travel.
Speaker 10: I just this is what I'm noticing about physical gold
Speaker 10: and silver is that? And that's why I've got it
Speaker 10: on my notes. So I'm going to talk to Yaka
Speaker 10: after the show. I just started thinking, you know they
Speaker 10: got rid of the penny this year, well why don't
Speaker 10: we buy I think Wolfpack gotta have the back to
Speaker 10: the copper pennies pre nineteen eighty two. We should start
Speaker 10: putting few in. I mean, that's that's real tangible assets.
Speaker 10: That's a that's a real asset. Even a copper penny
Speaker 10: prior nineteen eighty two is worth something. It's worth more
Speaker 10: than a cent.
Speaker 3: It costs four.
Speaker 2: It's amazing to me. It's amazing how quietly that happened too.
Speaker 2: You know, the penny is gone. You know, it's not
Speaker 2: going to be manufactured anymore. This is you know, sure
Speaker 2: it's one cent, but one cent used to actually be
Speaker 2: worth having. You know, people used to actually be able
Speaker 2: to buy things with a penny. That's how far we've
Speaker 2: come that a penny is now not even.
Speaker 3: Worth you know. They finally looked at and said nah,
Speaker 3: and they just scrapped it.
Speaker 2: And it's just everyone is fine with it because they
Speaker 2: realize that carrying a penny around with you is such
Speaker 2: a waste of time and effort. Yes, it's gone, and
Speaker 2: that's how far our money has fallen. We are just
Speaker 2: getting rid of it. We're discarding the penny. And if
Speaker 2: they're going to discard the penny, how long until they
Speaker 2: look at the nickel and.
Speaker 10: Go, well, it's fourteen It's costs fourteen cents to make
Speaker 10: a nickel. Now, it's just they won't they'll they'll get
Speaker 10: rid of the nickel too. And that's really about We've
Speaker 10: saw this at the beginning of COVID nineteen eighty four,
Speaker 10: when the money was dirty and want that dirty cash,
Speaker 10: dirty cash.
Speaker 3: You know it can't do that. It's the invisible feel
Speaker 3: the guys. I feel really bad for these Colombian drug lords.
Speaker 2: What are they going to get their hundreds to snort
Speaker 2: their cocaine with If the United States isn't just endlessly
Speaker 2: printing them. And I feel really sorry for them, you know,
Speaker 2: it's just it's going to be difficult though to do
Speaker 2: like CIA bucks or something.
Speaker 3: Maybe they SEEI it can print little vouchers, you know, this.
Speaker 10: Is they have its own like they'll do little loadable
Speaker 10: debit cards or something like that.
Speaker 3: The gift cards. Well, that's right.
Speaker 2: They can use the gift card to chop the cocaine
Speaker 2: and then you know, another CIA dud ad to snort it.
Speaker 3: This is perfect, this is easy. We're figuring it out.
Speaker 10: But yeah, the cash is under assault and they're gonna
Speaker 10: get rid of the penny. So I thought about, what
Speaker 10: if I bring back copper pennies, I mean like wheat
Speaker 10: pennies and stuff, and we you know, we could do
Speaker 10: I could buy them for you know, a discount on wholesale.
Speaker 3: Or platinum.
Speaker 10: I mean, I'm talking about bringing platinum, and platinum has
Speaker 10: had a great run in the last twelve months, and
Speaker 10: I think it's only I mean, these are precious metals
Speaker 10: and things that are finite resources that power the world.
Speaker 3: To make the world go around.
Speaker 10: I don't think they're going to go down price in
Speaker 10: a realm where fiat currency is imploding. So I'm gonna
Speaker 10: I'm thinking about bringing some other items into wolf Pack,
Speaker 10: and some stuff that we haven't done before, just for variety,
Speaker 10: and because the dollars dollars lost fifty percent or more
Speaker 10: of its purchasing power against gold in the last twelve months.
Speaker 3: I didn't make that call, Travis. I didn't say that
Speaker 3: was going to happen last year. I'm not that kind
Speaker 3: of prognosticator. I just know that on a long enough
Speaker 3: timeline it would happen. That's what happen.
Speaker 2: That's one of those ones where you have fact like,
Speaker 2: that's Babe Ruth level calling your shots, because oh yeah,
Speaker 2: anyone that would have said that would have probably been
Speaker 2: laughed out of the building. You're insane. There's no way
Speaker 2: that happens. That's crazy talk. And sure enough, here we
Speaker 2: are and the dollar doesn't show any signs of slowing down.
Speaker 2: So again, Wolfpack, you can go to David night dot
Speaker 2: gold start accumulating gold or silver. And we started a
Speaker 2: little bit late. So I've kept you a little bit long, Tony.
Speaker 2: I know you've got all kinds of stuff going on.
Speaker 2: I don't want to keep you too much. So again,
Speaker 2: Wolfpack and go to David Night dot gold and start
Speaker 2: accumulating anything else you want to leave the folks with.
Speaker 7: Tony.
Speaker 10: Sure, I'll be doing my radio show here at eleven
Speaker 10: am Central time, so I'm going to go prep for that,
Speaker 10: So find me over on Rumble an America Unplug channel
Speaker 10: or on my ex ex at Tony Ardburn.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for joining us, Tony, and again,
Speaker 2: David Knight dot gold. I am now going to turn
Speaker 2: you up. I'm not going to turn you over to
Speaker 2: Zoe Smith interview. My dad did, and I will see
Speaker 2: you all on Monday.
Speaker 3: Bye bye.
Speaker 6: Welcome back and joining us now is Zoe Smith. She
Speaker 6: has set up a website thrill Kill Medical cult dot com.
Speaker 6: You can also find her on substack. The name of
Speaker 6: the substack is Zoe. That's Ze dot substack dot com.
Speaker 6: And we want to talk to her about being a
Speaker 6: whistleblower and the things that she saw during the pandemic lockdown.
Speaker 6: Zoe worked as a medical coder for over a decade.
Speaker 6: Tell us a little bit about that. What was that
Speaker 6: involved with is that for insurance purposes, identifying the procedures
Speaker 6: and putting the right code on it.
Speaker 11: Yeah, Hi, thanks for thanks for being here. Yeah, So
Speaker 11: a medical coder, A lot of people don't even know
Speaker 11: that it exists because you don't really see it as
Speaker 11: a patient. But everything that happens to you in a hospital, clinic,
Speaker 11: X ray lab, whatever, has to have a diagnosis and
Speaker 11: procedure assigned, and that's how your doctor gets paid. So
Speaker 11: the coder is the one who reviews that documentation, assigns
Speaker 11: the right diagnosis code, assigns the right procedure code, and
Speaker 11: that's what gets put on the bill, and that your
Speaker 11: insurance or medicare uses to pay your doctor or the
Speaker 11: lab or the hospital for their services.
Speaker 12: So it's really boring until would happened and then you had.
Speaker 7: A bird I view of what was going on.
Speaker 6: I was just telling you off air, I said, the
Speaker 6: AHA moment for me was the aha the American Hospital
Speaker 6: Association and I believe it was August of twenty twenty.
Speaker 6: I've talked about this many times. They got very upset
Speaker 6: because they said to CMS, who was paying them? They said,
Speaker 6: you told us that we didn't have to have a
Speaker 6: PCR documentation for this.
Speaker 7: He said that you didn't have enough of.
Speaker 6: Them, and you said they didn't work, and you said,
Speaker 6: we just pointed somebody to a clinical diagnosis, and you
Speaker 6: would give us a twenty percent bonus on everything that
Speaker 6: we did to the people, as well as the upfront
Speaker 6: cash bonus of thirteen thousand dollars. And now you want
Speaker 6: to have this new requirement. You know that's not fair.
Speaker 6: So they were complaining because they weren't getting paid, and
Speaker 6: it kind of exposed the whole thing, except.
Speaker 7: Nobody would cover that.
Speaker 6: It was amazing to me how there was dead silence
Speaker 6: everywhere about that. I mean, you incentivize people to that degree.
Speaker 6: And I would always say to people, Look, the money
Speaker 6: is the issue.
Speaker 7: You know.
Speaker 6: The decoration of the emergency by Trump unleashed the money
Speaker 6: and then they put out these rules through CMS and
Speaker 6: paid these people to kill is really what was happening.
Speaker 6: And that's what you saw as well, right, Yeah.
Speaker 12: That's they did.
Speaker 11: I don't know if you're familiar with the vaxed bus,
Speaker 11: but Children's Health Defense they sent out a third one.
Speaker 11: So they've done a part one, part two, and now
Speaker 11: part three. The part three is called authorized to kill
Speaker 11: for that reason because the Cares Act really did it
Speaker 11: incentivized the behavior change in hospitals and with positions, and
Speaker 11: how they were able to practice medicine. It set everything
Speaker 11: on its head and it incentivize everything. What you're talking about,
Speaker 11: what the AGA said about you didn't even need a
Speaker 11: PCR test result to get that COVID diagnosis is absolutely correct.
Speaker 11: And that was one of the things that I noticed
Speaker 11: in the Pandora's box of things that changed right at.
Speaker 12: When they declared weeks to flatten the curve in.
Speaker 11: March twenty twenty, they changed all the coding roles as well.
Speaker 11: So the April first, twenty twenty is when the COVID
Speaker 11: nineteen diagnosis went into effect, and we were actually told
Speaker 11: to commit fraud before that time because we didn't have
Speaker 11: a code to reflect COVID nineteen and we needed.
Speaker 12: To track that so much.
Speaker 11: And of course everyone had to get the PCR test
Speaker 11: in order to get the diagnosis. But then there was
Speaker 11: this official coding guideline, which is what.
Speaker 12: We use as coders. It's like our bible.
Speaker 11: It tells us what's correct, what's fraud, and it's essentially
Speaker 11: it lays out the rules. And in those rules, there's
Speaker 11: a part that says, in order to be diagnosed with
Speaker 11: COVID nineteen, all your physician needs to do is write
Speaker 11: down in their medical opinion that they think that you
Speaker 11: have COVID nineteen. They didn't need to do an exam,
Speaker 11: they didn't need to have a PCR test result. And
Speaker 11: it says right in that official guideline, this is an
Speaker 11: exception to Section two H in Patient Coding Guidelines, which
Speaker 11: says for every other diagnosis, they have to do an
Speaker 11: exam and they have to have some sort of clinical documentation,
Speaker 11: usually some sort of lab work or diagnostics to prove
Speaker 11: their working diagnosis.
Speaker 12: So COVID was an exception.
Speaker 11: For that, and that was one of the really big
Speaker 11: red flags that came up for me. And of course
Speaker 11: I noticed in my position, not only is everyone getting
Speaker 11: this PCR test when we come in, they're not all sick,
Speaker 11: but then they get this COVID nineteen diagnosis. And the
Speaker 11: part that most people that still a lot of people
Speaker 11: aren't familiar with is when they did the two.
Speaker 12: Weeks to flatten the curve and they locked down everybody.
Speaker 11: They actually kicked people out of the ICU early, and
Speaker 11: they shut down other wings of the hospital. They went
Speaker 11: down to a skeleton crew, so they consolidated wings within
Speaker 11: the hospital, so the ER and the ICUs stayed open
Speaker 11: the rest of the hospital was shut down. We were
Speaker 11: getting furloughed and laid off and hiring freezes and no raises,
Speaker 11: no bonuses.
Speaker 12: During the time when the media was saying.
Speaker 11: These healthcare heroes are showing up to fight the onslaught
Speaker 11: of COVID nineteen patients.
Speaker 12: What was an onslaught of false positive tests?
Speaker 11: But it wasn't an onslaught of a whole bunch of patients.
Speaker 11: We were getting furloughed. So the hospital really really needed
Speaker 11: that money because they were bankrupted right before those incentives
Speaker 11: came out, so they really needed those incentives. So they
Speaker 11: were absolutely excited to label someone as COVID nineteen and
Speaker 11: get that twenty percent diagnosis, and then hook them up
Speaker 11: to the ventilator, which they got another bonus for, and
Speaker 11: then the rendes appear, which they were giving out.
Speaker 12: Like candy during this entire time.
Speaker 11: The bonus really didn't go into effect until August of
Speaker 11: twenty twenty, but they were using it from about April
Speaker 11: all the way through.
Speaker 12: And I noticed how the protocols were killing people.
Speaker 11: And doctors would just say, oh, this is a progression
Speaker 11: of COVID nineteen, And to this day a lot of
Speaker 11: people will say, oh, I had a family member that
Speaker 11: died of COVID. They went to the hospital because they
Speaker 11: had COVID and they died of COVID.
Speaker 12: But I asked them, did they really die of COVID
Speaker 12: or did they die of the protocol? Were they not
Speaker 12: that sick until they got there?
Speaker 11: And then they circled the drain because in my experience,
Speaker 11: most of the patients within sometimes a few days to
Speaker 11: sometimes it took up to a month. But those protocols
Speaker 11: were killing people, shutting down their organs and then they
Speaker 11: would die. And that wasn't normal to have that happen
Speaker 11: to a pneumonia patient. Normally they'd be there three days,
Speaker 11: we pump them full of antibiotics which we weren't using
Speaker 11: for COVID nineteen, and then they would go home.
Speaker 12: So this was totally backwards.
Speaker 11: And then I started to notice all the incentives because
Speaker 11: even as a coder, they have all these checks and
Speaker 11: balances in the electronic medical record system and it counts
Speaker 11: against you if you miss something, so like if I
Speaker 11: missed someone for COVID nineteen, I would get a notice
Speaker 11: about it, like, oh, this is going to count against
Speaker 11: your score and might not get a raise this year
Speaker 11: because you weren't a good coder, and they were watching
Speaker 11: that for randesivir because the bonuses were so much on
Speaker 11: the bill. Every single Randezevier infusion was four thousand dollars
Speaker 11: give her take a little bit throughout the country because
Speaker 11: it's weighted based on where you live, so be more
Speaker 11: expensive in New.
Speaker 12: York or California. But around four thousand dollars her dose
Speaker 12: is how much they were getting.
Speaker 6: Yeah, the ventilators. I interviewed a woman who was a nurse.
Speaker 6: She wrote a book called Pandemic Nurse, and she was
Speaker 6: in Florida and she said, I wasn't seeing the kind
Speaker 6: of narrative that they were talking about with the pandemic,
Speaker 6: and everybody was saying it was all happening up in
Speaker 6: New York. So she left and went to New York
Speaker 6: to help and set around for a couple of days
Speaker 6: after she told them she was there before they brought
Speaker 6: her in. When they finally did bring her in, she's like,
Speaker 6: you know what's going on? They're not busy either. When
Speaker 6: they brought her in, physician walked around, showed to people
Speaker 6: on the ventilators and said, you know, about ninety percent
Speaker 6: of these people are going to die, and.
Speaker 7: She said it was it was horrible. They were just
Speaker 7: killing people.
Speaker 6: And of course, when you look at it, if you
Speaker 6: get a thirteen percent, if you get a thirteen thousand
Speaker 6: dollars bonus for pointing at somebody and saying they got COVID,
Speaker 6: they may not even be sick, as you pointed out.
Speaker 6: Then if you put them on a ventilator, you get
Speaker 6: thirty nine thousand dollars already right there, You got fifty
Speaker 6: two thousand dollars for a machine that cost you fifty
Speaker 6: thousand dollars, and then they will pay you twenty percent
Speaker 6: on the charges that you've got for them to use
Speaker 6: it until you kill them with that ventilator. And again,
Speaker 6: pullmonologists were looking at this and come back and said,
Speaker 6: this never made any sense. We never did it, like
Speaker 6: as you're pointing out, they'd get people antibiotics and things
Speaker 6: like that, so we would never put people on a ventilator,
Speaker 6: you know, for pneumonia or things like that.
Speaker 12: Exactly.
Speaker 6: Well of it was so incredibly corrupt and counterintuitive, and
Speaker 6: they turned the hospitals into killing machines for money, and
Speaker 6: everybody was.
Speaker 7: Willing to do that.
Speaker 6: I mean, if you got somebody that's there, and even
Speaker 6: if it wasn't an economic emergency that have been created
Speaker 6: partially by the government. You know, if you were to
Speaker 6: tell somebody, you point to that person and say they've
Speaker 6: got this condition, I'll give you thirteen thousand dollars. We
Speaker 6: know how human nature works, and we know how the
Speaker 6: corporate hospitals work. I mean, the incentives to do that
Speaker 6: are going to be huge, just like the disincentives to
Speaker 6: report somebody when they've had a reaction to the vaccines
Speaker 6: are going to be huge as well. Were you still
Speaker 6: there when they started the vaccination program or had you
Speaker 6: left because you say that you left when they made
Speaker 6: the vaccine mandatory.
Speaker 7: Did you see it happening before that?
Speaker 11: I started to wake up during really when they started
Speaker 11: declaring two weeks to flatten the curb and I started
Speaker 11: seeing people wearing masks in public. I knew this was
Speaker 11: not this was not a pandemic and there was something
Speaker 11: some kind of psychological operation going on because I had
Speaker 11: worked in the hospital for the swine flu scare and
Speaker 11: it wasn't a thing in the hospital like it was
Speaker 11: just regular flu.
Speaker 12: I don't even talked to people that were on the.
Speaker 11: Front lines, like er doctors, and nurses, and they said
Speaker 11: some of them even said that they got it and
Speaker 11: it wasn't that big of a deal. So when they
Speaker 11: declared COVID, I was really suspicious, this is just going
Speaker 11: to be another vaccination campaign, because they already had mandates
Speaker 11: for the flu shot for healthcare workers for like a
Speaker 11: decade before that, and I had been.
Speaker 12: Doing the exemption every year.
Speaker 11: And the reason I did that is because the first
Speaker 11: year that they made healthcare workers get the flu shot,
Speaker 11: everybody was getting the flu. And so that was the
Speaker 11: year that we came up with the It was just
Speaker 11: a rumor within the university lab where I worked, but
Speaker 11: everybody was saying it that you get the flu from
Speaker 11: the flu shot. So ever since then, I just didn't
Speaker 11: want to do it. So during that whole year of
Speaker 11: operation work Speed, the only thing that's going to get
Speaker 11: us back to normal is this vaccine. I thought this,
Speaker 11: if the flu shot never worked, the chances that the
Speaker 11: COVID shot is going to work is slim to nil.
Speaker 12: And the amount of pressure for.
Speaker 11: This one compared to the flu shot is astronomical, So
Speaker 11: there's something to it. So that made me actually not
Speaker 11: just look at the COVID shot, but look at all
Speaker 11: the other vaccines, and what I learned was they don't
Speaker 11: teach coders or doctors or nurses anything about vaccine side
Speaker 11: effects or adverse effects, despite the fact that they have
Speaker 11: codes to assign for vaccine effects.
Speaker 12: But I would see patients come in.
Speaker 11: With like eon beurret before this, and the doctors would
Speaker 11: try very hard not to relate it to a vaccine,
Speaker 11: and there would be codes in there like adverse effect
Speaker 11: of flu shot or adverse effect whatever, and those are
Speaker 11: supposed to be like a safety signal code. Like one
Speaker 11: of the reasons why the ICD ten system, which is
Speaker 11: owned by the WHO, by the way, so every member
Speaker 11: state that is part of the WHO has to report
Speaker 11: these codes. And it's for statistical monitoring purposes. So this
Speaker 11: is how they monitor pandemics, this is how they monitor cancer,
Speaker 11: like how many cases of cancer there are throughout the world,
Speaker 11: or heart problems or pneumonia cases. This is the system
Speaker 11: that they use, and it's also supposed to be starting
Speaker 11: in clinical trials for devices and drugs to look for
Speaker 11: a safety signal. So I thought, with this COVID nineteen vaccine,
Speaker 11: there should be a code for adverse effect of this
Speaker 11: shot and it should.
Speaker 12: Be my job to assign it.
Speaker 11: So I did my due diligence, and I looked into
Speaker 11: all the warnings and what could happen if people got
Speaker 11: the shot, And then I looked at.
Speaker 12: What could happen if people got the.
Speaker 11: Other vaccines, and I started to realize that they had
Speaker 11: been varying all of the effects that people would get
Speaker 11: from vaccines and not assigning these adverse effect codes up
Speaker 11: until twenty twenty. And then when the COVID nineteen vaccine
Speaker 11: came out, there was no code to report it. So
Speaker 11: it should have been my job to collect that danger signal.
Speaker 11: And I even went on a podcast called Deborah Get's
Speaker 11: Red Pill.
Speaker 7: It was just a.
Speaker 11: Radio show in early twenty twenty one, right after I
Speaker 11: quit my job, and I said, the COVID nineteen vaccine
Speaker 11: is more dangerous than all of the other vaccines combined.
Speaker 11: And that was with my That was just an observation,
Speaker 11: but it was ten years of medical coding experience and
Speaker 11: then learning what I learned about vaccine side effects and
Speaker 11: all the cases that I saw of children in the
Speaker 11: er constantly having XMR rashes or even anaphylactic responses.
Speaker 12: And then I look at the record, they just got
Speaker 12: a vaccine, but the doctor's not connecting the two.
Speaker 11: So when COVID nineteen came out, people were having strokes, encephalitis,
Speaker 11: and blood claws like I've never seen before my own carditis.
Speaker 11: They were getting COVID nineteen immediately after getting the shot,
Speaker 11: like the same day or the next day, and then
Speaker 11: being hospitalized. There were people with paralytic problems, seizure disorders,
Speaker 11: blood disorders where they couldn't even figure out what was
Speaker 11: going on because the patient was plotting and bleeding at
Speaker 11: the same time and they didn't even know how to
Speaker 11: treat it.
Speaker 12: Crazy stuff started happening just in the first four.
Speaker 11: Months of the vaccine rolled out, so it wasn't even
Speaker 11: available to the rest of the public yet. But by
Speaker 11: summer in twenty twenty one is when they started saying
Speaker 11: you at home like this is the hospital leadership. They
Speaker 11: would have videos that they would send to all staff
Speaker 11: all the time monitoring COVID and they were really really
Speaker 11: pushing us to get that shot. They were saying, we're
Speaker 11: not doing as good as the other hospitals who are
Speaker 11: getting incentivized for meeting their vaccination quota, and we weren't,
Speaker 11: so they were pointing to us people who worked from home,
Speaker 11: who never saw patients, who never walked into a hospital.
Speaker 11: You guys are spreading it around society, and we're going
Speaker 11: to have to fire you if you don't get your shots.
Speaker 11: So at that point I couldn't take it anymore. I
Speaker 11: knew that my job had been to get them money
Speaker 11: for murdering patients, and I was having a crisis of
Speaker 11: conscience over that. And then before the vaccine went out,
Speaker 11: I decided I was going to be a spot at
Speaker 11: that point and just see if the vaccine really was
Speaker 11: as bad as old warnings said. And then it turned
Speaker 11: out to be far worse than I anticipated, and I
Speaker 11: didn't think that the chances would be very good that
Speaker 11: I would get an exemption. Because they changed the rules
Speaker 11: for getting an exemption. A lot of people got fired,
Speaker 11: and I didn't want to work for them anymore. I
Speaker 11: didn't want to continue helping them get money to murder people.
Speaker 7: Good for you, Good for you. Yeah, you really do
Speaker 7: have to walk out.
Speaker 6: You really did have a bird's eye view of this
Speaker 6: whole thing, because you're seeing the diagnostic codes as well
Speaker 6: as the treatments that are there, and so you could
Speaker 6: get a good picture of what was actually coming on
Speaker 6: and seeing the trends that were there. That's very interesting
Speaker 6: your perspective. You know, I've got something, and I apologize
Speaker 6: it because we can't feed this to you, so you
Speaker 6: can't hear this. I'll kind of talk about it and
Speaker 6: describe it, but I want the audience to hear what Lutnick.
Speaker 6: I call him lucky Lucky Lieutnik. What he said in
Speaker 6: terms about the money that can be made off of
Speaker 6: this kind of stuff, And he uses an example of
Speaker 6: the vaccines.
Speaker 9: The United States company, the most powerful, the greatest customer,
Speaker 9: buys stuff we walk in. We're going to buy is
Speaker 9: the example I like to use.
Speaker 4: We're going to buy two.
Speaker 9: Billion COVID vaccines. When we buy it, Fiza and Maderna
Speaker 9: stocks are going to triple.
Speaker 7: We're going to triple.
Speaker 3: So then we say everyone's going to have this vaccine.
Speaker 9: If I were after Jared Kushner negotiated the best daily could,
Speaker 9: Howard Letnik walked in the room, Howard Letnig would say,
Speaker 9: what do you think twenty percent warrants? Twenty percent warrants right?
Speaker 12: What?
Speaker 9: So we'd make fifty billion dollars off of who nobody
Speaker 9: We didn't take from anybody, but to do it. Okay,
Speaker 9: the shareholders and Pfizer, who we've just tripled them with
Speaker 9: our order.
Speaker 7: Now, how many of my custom.
Speaker 6: Yeah, Zoe's what he's saying. Zoe says, yeah, you get
Speaker 6: the US government's the most powerful customers. So we're going
Speaker 6: to go in and we're going to buy two billion
Speaker 6: dollars worth of these vaccines from Fizer Mouderna.
Speaker 7: We're going to force people to take them. He goes.
Speaker 6: So I'm looking at this and I'm saying, well, I'm
Speaker 6: going to get some twenty percent warrants. I want some
Speaker 6: action of that. I know what's going to happen with
Speaker 6: all this, And he says, and you know, and who
Speaker 6: have we harmed with all this stuff. It's like the
Speaker 6: people who got the shot, obviously, But he doesn't even
Speaker 6: see that. He sees nothing but dollar signs. This is
Speaker 6: the guy, of course, that is now the Commerce secretary
Speaker 6: for Trump, and he's the guy who's pushing through the
Speaker 6: stable coins and all the rest of this stuff. Makes
Speaker 6: you wonder what he is going to be doing to
Speaker 6: this with the stable coins and the resetting of the
Speaker 6: financial system. This is these are people who see nothing
Speaker 6: other than money, and they don't care what they have
Speaker 6: to do to other people in order to make money.
Speaker 6: It truly is amazing, the greed and the system and
Speaker 6: the right.
Speaker 11: It is so hard for me to wrap my brain
Speaker 11: around how many people they killed. It was a science
Speaker 11: silent genocide that is still invisible. But there's no family
Speaker 11: that I can that I've talked to in the last
Speaker 11: five years that hasn't been touched by it in some way.
Speaker 11: Either someone they know is suffering from cancer or some
Speaker 11: horrible chronic condition after getting the shop, or they've lost
Speaker 11: somebody like I lost my cousin who was seventeen who
Speaker 11: suddenly just drove into a tree and they didn't do
Speaker 11: an autopsy or look into it. And there's countless other
Speaker 11: people out there like that. I mean, this, this was
Speaker 11: our family, and people are still just kind of burying
Speaker 11: their heads in the sand and one things to go.
Speaker 12: On like it didn't happen.
Speaker 11: The amazing system is still set up to where it
Speaker 11: could still happen again, Like we haven't even held those
Speaker 11: people accountable.
Speaker 6: As a matter of fact, we put them back an
Speaker 6: office again. And so you know, that's why to me,
Speaker 6: I look at it and What astounds me the most
Speaker 6: is just how effective the control of information has been.
Speaker 6: That's why what you're doing is so important. You've got
Speaker 6: to get out there and tell people what happened, because,
Speaker 6: as you point out, all most everybody I know as well,
Speaker 6: there's been somebody in their family, immediate or extended family
Speaker 6: that's been harmed by this. But everybody thinks that this
Speaker 6: is a one off. It didn't happen to everybody else.
Speaker 6: They don't realize that it happened, how broad this is
Speaker 6: and how extensive it is, And I think that they're loone,
Speaker 6: just like they wanted us to think that we were
Speaker 6: lone if we saw what was happening and we weren't
Speaker 6: going to participate in it. Well, you're the only one
Speaker 6: who thinks like that, and we're not. You know, there's
Speaker 6: a lot of people out there who saw what was happening,
Speaker 6: and we're onto this scam from the very beginning. And
Speaker 6: I had the help of a person who gave me
Speaker 6: a heads up about a year before this happened. He said,
Speaker 6: there's a lot of chatter about Dark Winter two, and
Speaker 6: he goes, you know what Dark Winter one was? And
Speaker 6: he's like, yeah, I know about that, and so when
Speaker 6: I saw this, it was falling right in the pattern
Speaker 6: of all these germ games. The very first one was
Speaker 6: two months before nine to eleven, so I knew exactly
Speaker 6: what was happening with this, and also knew about the
Speaker 6: PCR test and what Karrien Mollison said, talk a little
Speaker 6: bit about what you saw with the PCR right.
Speaker 11: So that was another part of the Pandora's box that
Speaker 11: changed right at the beginning of March twenty twenty when
Speaker 11: they declared two weeks to flatten the curb and changed.
Speaker 12: Our whole lives upside down. I noticed that before COVID.
Speaker 11: I worked in the university lab when I was in college,
Speaker 11: and we had what's called a rapid flu test, and
Speaker 11: it was something that it was a no swamp too,
Speaker 11: or it could be a saliva swamp, but it wasn't
Speaker 11: something that went all the way up to your green
Speaker 11: like the COVID PCR swamp did, and even the instructions
Speaker 11: like us in the lab as lab assistants, the one
Speaker 11: of the number one things we did was coach people
Speaker 11: on how to collect specimens properly, because it was.
Speaker 12: Our job to like screen them make sure they were.
Speaker 11: Going to work for the test, and if they weren't
Speaker 11: in a correct format to accept for the test, then
Speaker 11: we'd have to tell the nurser doctor, we need you
Speaker 11: to go recollect that specimen. So these rapid flu tests,
Speaker 11: they had to be done within fifteen minutes, and it
Speaker 11: was basically a PCR test. It didn't have the same
Speaker 11: cycle threshold part, so it's kind of a predecessor to
Speaker 11: the COVID nineteen PCR test. But it wasn't done on
Speaker 11: every patient that had a cold or flu symptom or
Speaker 11: a pneumonia at all.
Speaker 12: It was only done on patients that came in.
Speaker 11: With a recurrent pneumonia that they couldn't cure or a
Speaker 11: recurrent cold, and it would be done to try and
Speaker 11: figure out which types of medications this particular disease would
Speaker 11: respond to. So it was like a case by case basis.
Speaker 11: It wasn't just everybody that walked.
Speaker 12: Into the hospital.
Speaker 11: And so when COVID nineteen came around and they said
Speaker 11: you need to stick this all the way up into
Speaker 11: people's brains, no saliva, and it has to be on
Speaker 11: every single person, because I mean, it really flipped it.
Speaker 12: At one point. It went from you can't get the
Speaker 12: PCR tests, like because.
Speaker 11: They had a drive through where you could go out
Speaker 11: into society at first and you have to go to
Speaker 11: one of these PCR testing centers and they'd say you
Speaker 11: have to have symptoms.
Speaker 12: You can't get it unless you have symptoms.
Speaker 11: And then people were mad that they couldn't get the
Speaker 11: PCR tests. And then like overnight, it flipped to now
Speaker 11: everybody has to get it for everything.
Speaker 12: You have to get it if you walk in the er,
Speaker 12: even if you don't have COVID symptoms.
Speaker 11: And I thought that was weird. We never did that before.
Speaker 11: That is not supposed to be a screening test. It's
Speaker 11: supposed to be a diagnostic test. Because the screen is
Speaker 11: done when you don't have symptoms. It's trying to rule
Speaker 11: out if you're developing something. And they were telling us
Speaker 11: asymptomatic spread. Well, I could see in the hospital there's
Speaker 11: no such thing as asymptomatic spread. This six feet thing
Speaker 11: is made up. Masks don't work. I knew that from
Speaker 11: the very beginning because masks in the hospital had only
Speaker 11: been used for like collecting spittle over like a certury case.
Speaker 11: It wasn't meant to prevent germ spread. That was never
Speaker 11: part of our infection control. So I knew there was
Speaker 11: something up with these PCR tests, and I kept looking
Speaker 11: at the results, and finally I find that it's done
Speaker 11: by a PCR, And I recalled my time at a
Speaker 11: university lab when we were just starting PCR testing, because
Speaker 11: this was early two thousands and Mullers invented it, like
Speaker 11: late eighty six is when the NIH took it up
Speaker 11: and started using PCR. So it got into healthcare early
Speaker 11: two thousands, and all the texts, like my mom was
Speaker 11: a medical technologist. It was her job, which she actually
Speaker 11: ran one of these labs. It was her job to
Speaker 11: run those tests. And they were all talking like this
Speaker 11: was like their new tech, like they were a kid
Speaker 11: in candy store, excited about it, this PCR thing.
Speaker 12: But it was all genetic testing. It was genetic.
Speaker 11: It was done for cancer screening, which they thought was genetic,
Speaker 11: and it was done for like women that would like
Speaker 11: they would call it genetic counseling. If you were a
Speaker 11: couple and you're a female, and you go and you
Speaker 11: want to have genetic counseling. You can see if you
Speaker 11: have like a hereditary disease like Huntington's and then maybe
Speaker 11: decide if you want to continue with procreation or not.
Speaker 12: So it was genetic. So I thought, why all of
Speaker 12: a sudden are we testing for viruses with PCR.
Speaker 11: Well, while I wasn't looking because for ten years I
Speaker 11: was a medical coder, so I wasn't really looking at
Speaker 11: what was going on in the lab until COVID happened.
Speaker 11: So then I find it's by PCR, and I start
Speaker 11: looking at well, there's obviously this problem with false positives.
Speaker 11: Even Elon Musk was saying, I got two tests in
Speaker 11: one day and one was negative, one and was positive.
Speaker 11: And I could see the hospital was running over and
Speaker 11: over and over these PCR tests waiting to get a
Speaker 11: positive result if they didn't get the right result, And
Speaker 11: I'm like, this doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 12: What is going on here? And it fast forward to
Speaker 12: like after the PCR test evolved.
Speaker 11: A little bit, toward the end of twenty twenty into
Speaker 11: twenty twenty one one, they had it what's called a
Speaker 11: PCR multiplex assay, so it was four different viruses they
Speaker 11: were actually monitoring flu A, flu, b RSB, and COVID
Speaker 11: nineteen and the only one that ever came up positive
Speaker 11: out of a whole year of running all four of
Speaker 11: these viruses was COVID, not one flu, not one RSB,
Speaker 11: And they say, we have an RSB.
Speaker 7: It's such an amazing thing.
Speaker 6: And you know, we go back and we used to
Speaker 6: play the clips all the time of Malis calling out
Speaker 6: Faucci because you know, Faucci used the PCR test claim
Speaker 6: that AIDS was caused by a virus, and that created
Speaker 6: a big back and forth between them, and Malas said, well,
Speaker 6: I'm not going to get involved in that fight, but
Speaker 6: I'll tell you this that you can't prove it using
Speaker 6: the PCR test.
Speaker 7: It can't be used as a diagnostis like that.
Speaker 6: And so it was very seeing it because they also
Speaker 6: did not isolate the HIV, you know, the the virus
Speaker 6: that supposedly caused AIDS either, and so this whole thing
Speaker 6: has been kind of a bluff. What it reminds me of,
Speaker 6: Zoe is the polygraph tests. My wife used to be
Speaker 6: a district personnel manager for convenience stores, and what they
Speaker 6: would do if they would have, you know, massive shortages
Speaker 6: somewhere and they thought there was theft that was going
Speaker 6: on with the employees, they would call them in and
Speaker 6: polygraph them and the polygraph did not work, but it
Speaker 6: only worked if people believed that it could tell them
Speaker 6: tell whether or not they were lying, and then they
Speaker 6: would tell the truth about it and make a confession. Right,
Speaker 6: So it was simply a mind game that was being
Speaker 6: played on the people that were there. And that's what exactly, Yeah,
Speaker 6: that's what the PCR thing is. It really is a
Speaker 6: mind game, except that it's become something of a lie
Speaker 6: detector for the people who are administering it. We realize
Speaker 6: now that they are the liars who are putting this
Speaker 6: stuff out. And just had in a comment Lance put
Speaker 6: up my producer, he said that video of Lootennik where
Speaker 6: he's talking about that reminds him of this scene out
Speaker 6: of the Big Short, which we just went back and
Speaker 6: watched again because of the AI bubble, And at one
Speaker 6: point this guy gets up and he's talking and one
Speaker 6: of the guys who's onto the whole scam says, why
Speaker 6: is he confessing, And the other guy says, he's not confessing,
Speaker 6: he's bragging.
Speaker 7: Reason what Lutnik was doing. He wasn't confessing about all
Speaker 7: this stuff. He was bragging about it.
Speaker 6: And now he continues to get away with this kind
Speaker 6: of stuff truly is amazing.
Speaker 11: Yeah, yeah, Well, what's even more nefarious about the PCR
Speaker 11: test is so the false positive narrative that is only
Speaker 11: it's about the cycle threshold.
Speaker 12: But you're correct, they didn't actually sequence.
Speaker 11: They didn't sequence stars Kobe too, so they never had
Speaker 11: a sequence. They have what's called a consensus sequence, which
Speaker 11: is an average that AI came up with, and that's
Speaker 11: what they used because they knew they would find this
Speaker 11: in a percentage of people, and then they could dial
Speaker 11: it in with the cycle threshold up or down.
Speaker 12: Same thing with the age thing. And they never isolated aids.
Speaker 11: And they use their antibody tests at first, which could
Speaker 11: be dialed up or down in the same way.
Speaker 12: As the cycle threshold. And David Rasnik, PhD, who I've interviewed,
Speaker 12: can vouch for that, and he's got all the science
Speaker 12: on his web page to prove all of that. But
Speaker 12: what I was looking past.
Speaker 11: The cycle threshold because I knew this test is dialed
Speaker 11: in for some reason, like they can predict the results somehow,
Speaker 11: and I needed to know how they were manipulating the test,
Speaker 11: and so I looked a little bit further and I
Speaker 11: find a document from the CDC that says for every
Speaker 11: COVID test, every CLIA certified lab, which is all of them,
Speaker 11: they all have to be in order to build insurance
Speaker 11: or anything, have to be CLIA certified. Then they have
Speaker 11: to send a genetic sequence to one of two gene banks,
Speaker 11: either NCBI or GISAID gene banks.
Speaker 12: And it listed like eight different sequences. So there saying
Speaker 12: you know the variants in the details.
Speaker 11: But if you look at some of these labs that
Speaker 11: were running PCR tests and making all the money off
Speaker 11: running these PCR tests, they could also take that same
Speaker 11: sample off that machine, put it on another machine, run
Speaker 11: a sequence, and they needed to in order to comply
Speaker 11: with the CDC's directive to send genetic sequences to these
Speaker 11: gene banks. And I interviewed David Rasnik, who is a
Speaker 11: chemistry professor who worked with.
Speaker 12: Kerrie Molas and new Kerrie Molis.
Speaker 11: I asked them directly, do you think that they were
Speaker 11: just clipping a tiny little section of the genetic code
Speaker 11: and then sending it to these gene banks or do
Speaker 11: you think they were getting the entire sequence?
Speaker 12: And he says, well, they're running.
Speaker 11: A lab, they're busy, they're not really thinking about you know,
Speaker 11: taking the time to clit out a sequence.
Speaker 12: So could they yes, but would they really do that?
Speaker 11: No, It'd be so much easier for them to just
Speaker 11: send the whole thing and then let the gene bank
Speaker 11: decide which part that they want to determine is the
Speaker 11: variant of concern.
Speaker 12: So they were, And you look at the different gene banks.
Speaker 11: There's one called Data Van which is now a public
Speaker 11: private partnership. You look at a Human Genome Project which
Speaker 11: is now BGI Bgien Genetics I think in China, which
Speaker 11: is their biggest biotech company. And there's billions of billions
Speaker 11: of dollars in collecting our DNA, and what they say
Speaker 11: they're using it for is to And now we have
Speaker 11: Larry Ellison actually admitting it day two of the Trump
Speaker 11: administration that they're going to use AI, which is what
Speaker 11: they use to get the consensus sequence that they dial
Speaker 11: the PCR test in with.
Speaker 12: They're going to use AI to.
Speaker 11: Look at our blood and then make a drug or
Speaker 11: a therapeutic or a vaccine tailored to our individual genome.
Speaker 12: And now there's a.
Speaker 11: Massive industry of all these big tech oligarchs that are
Speaker 11: using AI to develop different vaccines or different therapeutics, biotech
Speaker 11: therapeutics tailored to the individual genome.
Speaker 12: So whether or not.
Speaker 11: They're successful with this technology, there's a whole bunch.
Speaker 12: Of money invested in it.
Speaker 11: So I think PCR was actually a data mining operation
Speaker 11: as well as the money laundering operation.
Speaker 7: That's interesting.
Speaker 6: Yeah, And of course if they want to make a
Speaker 6: bioweapon that's going to target certain groups of people, that
Speaker 6: makes it very easy.
Speaker 7: To do that as well.
Speaker 6: You know, and when you look at the PCR Handy
Speaker 6: who also has a substack and he's been a regular
Speaker 6: listener comment or on the program, he worked in hospitals
Speaker 6: and he said he was suspicious of these things. Finally
Speaker 6: got a nurse to take one of these swabs right
Speaker 6: out of the package and run it through and got
Speaker 6: a positive test without swamping anybody.
Speaker 7: So some of these yeah, it was such garbage.
Speaker 6: I mean, either it's preloaded with something or the PCR
Speaker 6: test is just so off the charts with its ignification.
Speaker 7: Whatever.
Speaker 6: You can find anything anywhere. Carry Mallis didn't be.
Speaker 12: The president of Tanzania.
Speaker 11: I think he did some PCs like a papaya and
Speaker 11: like a Coca cola.
Speaker 6: That's right, it's total nonsense and garbage. And I remember
Speaker 6: when they had the con Film Festival. It was in
Speaker 6: the summer of twenty twenty, and you had all these
Speaker 6: elitists who somehow they got there, I guess on their
Speaker 6: private jets didn't have to get screened too much. But anyway,
Speaker 6: they're there and they were complaining that they had to
Speaker 6: do spit tests. They said, that's disgusting. We got to
Speaker 6: spit in this thing and they got to test it
Speaker 6: and so forth. I said, yeah, so why don't they
Speaker 6: allow us to do a spit test? Right, they got
Speaker 6: to ram that thing up your nose. But you don't
Speaker 6: get that. But the elites, the jet setters, the private jets,
Speaker 6: they get the spit test or whatever.
Speaker 12: Oh my god, that's funny.
Speaker 7: All this stuff was just.
Speaker 11: When in the university lab there was something called sputum testing,
Speaker 11: which is exactly that you basically at hakka lougi into
Speaker 11: a cup, and like it was the most disgusting SAMD
Speaker 11: I ever had to deal with when I worked.
Speaker 12: In the lab, and I make a joke in my book.
Speaker 11: We all were spared that they didn't make that the
Speaker 11: test that we had to do.
Speaker 12: But I'm telling me, that's what the elites do.
Speaker 6: Yeah, I think that's preferable, to have that thing ram
Speaker 6: rotted up your nose. I guess I didn't have that
Speaker 6: done to me, so I, yeah, I went the thing
Speaker 6: without having a PCR test.
Speaker 7: Sorry, go ahead me neither.
Speaker 11: That was another reason why I walked out, because if
Speaker 11: I were to stay in the hospital, they are stay
Speaker 11: working for them and get the exemption that I was
Speaker 11: going to have to take a PCR test every week,
Speaker 11: and I didn't want to have to take a PCR test.
Speaker 12: I was pretty sure they were going to be collecting.
Speaker 11: Our DNA with it, or sensing if we're vaccinated or not,
Speaker 11: or somehow timed that in with the vaccine passport.
Speaker 12: It wasn't entirely sure how it was going to work.
Speaker 11: But I knew that it wasn't what they were telling us,
Speaker 11: and I wasn't about to play long.
Speaker 12: So that was another reason why I.
Speaker 6: Couldn't, And of course so are the other things too,
Speaker 6: where some people did some you know, zoomed down a
Speaker 6: microscope looking at the tip of the swab and said,
Speaker 6: look at this. You know, here's one of the cotton
Speaker 6: swab and here's this PCR thing. It's got all these
Speaker 6: spikes on it, and if I run it across some
Speaker 6: of these things of spikes stick and steak. So are
Speaker 6: they actually implanting something into you? You know, there's uh, there's.
Speaker 12: Some research on it, and I found there were.
Speaker 11: Two chemicals on the tip of the swab. One of
Speaker 11: them was ethylene oxide, and that alone can like they
Speaker 11: were putting it, you know, way up in your nose
Speaker 11: where your pineal gland is your third eye, which is right.
Speaker 12: At the top.
Speaker 11: So putting that chemical right there is known to cause cancer, right,
Speaker 11: and so the more you do it, the more personogenic
Speaker 11: it's going to be. And then it also has a
Speaker 11: chemical property where it will basically block and calcify your
Speaker 11: pineal glands, so it like.
Speaker 12: Closes your third eye.
Speaker 11: And it's also a way that your brain can sense light.
Speaker 11: It's how your your body basically like synchronizes hormones throughout
Speaker 11: your whole body. So it can like change your whole
Speaker 11: endocurrent system if you set off your if you close
Speaker 11: or calcifi your pinial plan so all sorts of things
Speaker 11: could happen just with that one chemical. But I think
Speaker 11: there was also graphine oxide on there. There was different
Speaker 11: schools that said they have been given these special masks
Speaker 11: even that had graphine in them similar like the exact
Speaker 11: same phenomenon about the fibers that actually move and respond
Speaker 11: to magnetics.
Speaker 12: Graphine oxide has.
Speaker 11: A magnetic property to it, That's why they wanted to
Speaker 11: use it. But it's also supposed to be a clean
Speaker 11: so they were saying, like, we're using this to make
Speaker 11: it antibacterial, because it has antibacterial properties. But both the
Speaker 11: swaves and some of the masks had graphene fibers in
Speaker 11: them that could maybe do.
Speaker 7: That, and no idea what that.
Speaker 12: Would do if you shove it up your nose over
Speaker 12: and over and over.
Speaker 6: So they can't inject the graphene into you, they can
Speaker 6: get it in there another way. And of course I've
Speaker 6: mentioned this many times too. There's a couple of different batches,
Speaker 6: each of them over a million of these shots in Japan,
Speaker 6: and they noticed that they were getting black particulates. I
Speaker 6: don't know if it happened because they didn't keep them
Speaker 6: at the super cold temperatures or whatever, but they noticed
Speaker 6: black participants in the particulates, and they said they reacted
Speaker 6: with magnets.
Speaker 7: Yeah, so what is that?
Speaker 6: But they will end the story no more talking about that,
Speaker 6: and the Japanese government threw away a couple million of
Speaker 6: these vaccines because of that type of thing. But yeah,
Speaker 6: there's just so many issues there and people have been
Speaker 6: lied to so thoroughly about all the stuff. That is
Speaker 6: why it's not a dead issue. It is still alive.
Speaker 6: And they're going to try to do all this stuff again,
Speaker 6: and since it worked so well, they will use the
Speaker 6: same tactics again. That's why it's very important to talk
Speaker 6: about these different tactics.
Speaker 7: And that's what you're doing.
Speaker 11: Yes, right, they're moving forward with the mRNA. I mean
Speaker 11: they're not only putting it in our food like we've
Speaker 11: probably heard.
Speaker 12: I'm sure your audience has.
Speaker 11: Heard about the bird flu and how they're doing the
Speaker 11: self amplifying bird flu injections for poultry, and they're trying.
Speaker 12: To get it in cattle. And they've had.
Speaker 11: mRNA shots in pork, so almost all all the pork
Speaker 11: is tainted now since like twenty eighteen. Now they're rolling
Speaker 11: it out for pets. So now when you go in,
Speaker 11: you try it and you have to get your annual
Speaker 11: RABY shot for your pets. Now that's going to be mRNA.
Speaker 11: They're moving over to the m RNA platform.
Speaker 12: For all the vaccines.
Speaker 11: So nor means that who might be a little like
Speaker 11: cautious about COVID nineteen because they've heard the rumors by
Speaker 11: now most of them, but they haven't heard that now
Speaker 11: your RSV, your flu, and a lot of even like
Speaker 11: the childhood vaccines are moving over to this mRNA platform
Speaker 11: where they get to bypass clinical trials. So it still
Speaker 11: hasn't been This is a experiment that is now being
Speaker 11: rolled out to all our vaccines under the guise of
Speaker 11: this is totally fine, this is normal science. We've totally
Speaker 11: tested this, but it's absolutely not.
Speaker 7: I mean, that's right, and people need to understood.
Speaker 12: For like three years, yeah, for the first one, we
Speaker 12: just barely passed the first part of monitory.
Speaker 6: That's right, and people need to understand that the guy
Speaker 6: who boasted about being the father of the vaccine. First
Speaker 6: things he did is you pointed out Stargate thing with
Speaker 6: Larry Ellison where he's talking about, well, we're going to
Speaker 6: use AI to design custom design this for your genetics,
Speaker 6: and then we will deliver it with an MRI platform,
Speaker 6: and the person that they put in as they chose
Speaker 6: to put in at the head of the CDC was
Speaker 6: Susan Monirez, and that had been what she was working
Speaker 6: on with BARTA and with ARPA H and these these
Speaker 6: dark bioweapon companies that are part of the of the
Speaker 6: government and the military industrial conflicts and the bioweapon platforms
Speaker 6: and things like that. That's so there's all these different
Speaker 6: threads that tie this throughout the Trump administration pushing mRNA
Speaker 6: for all these various things. And of course then broke Rawlins,
Speaker 6: who's the Agricultural Secretary. She decides on her own initiative
Speaker 6: that she's going to end this mass culling of chickens
Speaker 6: by authorizing the mRNA bird flu for chickens, and then
Speaker 6: they authorize it for other livestock as well. It is
Speaker 6: the signals are all there that this is all still
Speaker 6: going on, that Trump is right at the epicenter of
Speaker 6: all this mRNA stuff. And I guess what we could
Speaker 6: call now the MRNAI as an AI artificial intelligence.
Speaker 7: It's all connected together, isn't it.
Speaker 11: Absolutely, it's a giant web, and it is going to
Speaker 11: be tied to.
Speaker 12: Our behavior scores and if we comply, how much we
Speaker 12: can play with it.
Speaker 11: Looking at who's monitoring the DNA where they have to
Speaker 11: report the PCR results to who's hiding the adverse effects
Speaker 11: of the vaccine? Putting that all together and looking at
Speaker 11: where are they actually where are we reporting all of
Speaker 11: these PCR results, and where are we reporting the COVID
Speaker 11: nineteen case numbers. And now we actually have a code
Speaker 11: to report the COVID nineteen adverse effects, but it's.
Speaker 12: Still not being used.
Speaker 11: So looking at that and trying to figure out where
Speaker 11: the code was and why we're not able to report
Speaker 11: it still, I happen to find that every agency involved
Speaker 11: in monitoring COVID nineteen cases and vaccination tracking specifically because
Speaker 11: there's so many vaccine registries that blows your mind. It's
Speaker 11: tied to national security. So it's a matter of national
Speaker 11: security if you participate in this scheme.
Speaker 6: Yeah, and this is all DARPA, and it's all the
Speaker 6: military and the intelligence agencies and all of the Dark
Speaker 6: Winter stuff they had, you know, Faucci and the former
Speaker 6: head of the CIA was playing the role of the
Speaker 6: president during the first germ game of Dark Winter. I mean,
Speaker 6: it's all the usual suspects that are involved in all
Speaker 6: this stuff. It really is a bioweapon that is really
Speaker 6: targeted to the population, and it truly is amazing.
Speaker 11: I think they're even going to try and do more
Speaker 11: data mining, like go even further than PCR testing with
Speaker 11: the wearables where rollout that we're getting now because the information,
Speaker 11: like when I learned that our COVID nineteen case numbers
Speaker 11: the PCR test is actually getting reported to foreign countries
Speaker 11: and our DNA is being data mined, and they're able
Speaker 11: to tell if we've had a vaccine or not, what's
Speaker 11: our ethnicity, where we are, how much money we make.
Speaker 11: Like they're layering all of this information. And during Operation
Speaker 11: work Speed, they had a program called Tiberius, which was
Speaker 11: used in hospitals. There's different Palnteer programs that are used
Speaker 11: in hospitals to monitor and manage the hospital down to
Speaker 11: like staffing. There was even a program that was part
Speaker 11: of Operation work Speed called HHS Protect and the hospitals
Speaker 11: had to report how many ventilators were in use, how
Speaker 11: many patients were there.
Speaker 12: I don't know why. My camera just stopped. That was weird.
Speaker 7: Well I still have audio, literally, just I didn't do it.
Speaker 7: You're back. That's good, you're back.
Speaker 11: So they had this program that hospitals had to report
Speaker 11: how many ventilators, how many patients are in the ICU,
Speaker 11: how much rendeeseverr We were using what's our census report,
Speaker 11: like all kinds of information that even the hospital didn't
Speaker 11: want to have to report, in addition all the other
Speaker 11: data mining we were doing. And that program was a
Speaker 11: Palanteer program called Tiberius, which it's used in Gaza, and
Speaker 11: that's the one that they use to assign risk scores.
Speaker 12: Well, they used that here already in America during.
Speaker 11: Operation Warp Speed to figure out if you were vaccinated
Speaker 11: or not, to target different ethnic groups for vaccines, and
Speaker 11: then to figure out where the counter measures, as in,
Speaker 11: where did the ventilators need to go? Where did the
Speaker 11: rendezebir need to go? So they've already had these programs
Speaker 11: in place that are tied into our medical records.
Speaker 12: And then to hear Larry Ellison say we're going to
Speaker 12: use your.
Speaker 11: Medical records and your DNA, your personal data to design
Speaker 11: stuff directly to you. And then in addition they say
Speaker 11: we're going to put wearables on you. They're going to
Speaker 11: monitor your body at all times for the purposes of
Speaker 11: national security. And I don't know how that doesn't send
Speaker 11: shivers down the spine.
Speaker 12: In this country.
Speaker 7: Yeah, absolutely.
Speaker 6: I mean we look at their big data thing that
Speaker 6: they have to have total information awareness. Remember how everybody
Speaker 6: was creeped out about that, and yet that is what
Speaker 6: this really is the implementation of this. The big data
Speaker 6: is looking at everything that you're doing, not just online,
Speaker 6: but they've got to get it out of cyberspace into
Speaker 6: physical space with all these other aspects of it. And
Speaker 6: companies like Palanteer, they have been focused on geospatial intelligence
Speaker 6: and data mining and making all these drawing all these
Speaker 6: conclusions about people's politics or religion so forth, based just
Speaker 6: on even geospatial intelligence. When they get to additional factors
Speaker 6: like this, they know everything about you and we're not
Speaker 6: allowed to know anything about what they do or the results.
Speaker 6: That's why it really is, at its essence, that is
Speaker 6: an information war, because it is all the information that's
Speaker 6: flowing in one direction, and they have an insatiable appetite
Speaker 6: to know everything about everybody. It is part and parcel
Speaker 6: of their control, this total knowledge about everyone and everything,
Speaker 6: and now AI and especially companies like Palanteer, have given
Speaker 6: them the ability to go through and collate this massive
Speaker 6: amount of data that they've been collecting for some time.
Speaker 6: Now they can make sense of it. Because it was
Speaker 6: so much information they've been collecting on people, they couldn't
Speaker 6: sort through it with humans, and so now they've got
Speaker 6: the AI that can sort through this. That is what's
Speaker 6: so concerning about all of this.
Speaker 12: And so it really is because when you go on
Speaker 12: social media.
Speaker 11: And you're fed an algorithm of like which posts do
Speaker 11: you get to see today, that's going to be how
Speaker 11: our whole lives are run. And I don't know how
Speaker 11: many people have known complain about their algorithm.
Speaker 12: Oh it's just it's.
Speaker 11: Triggering me today, or I don't know why my algorithm's
Speaker 11: all screwed up and it's showing me blah blah. Well,
Speaker 11: imagine if that same algorithm is now your government gets
Speaker 11: to make decisions about if you're a good person or not,
Speaker 11: and if you get to go out today, or if
Speaker 11: you get to eat today, or if you get to
Speaker 11: use your money today.
Speaker 7: Yeah, that's right. Yeah, all about total control.
Speaker 6: And of course that guy Lucky Loutnik, Howard Lutnik, who
Speaker 6: is bragging about how much money he can make, knowing
Speaker 6: that the government was going to just flood cash into
Speaker 6: these pharmaceutical companies, now he can go in and I
Speaker 6: can make money off of that, right, So he's got
Speaker 6: this insider information.
Speaker 7: He's the guy that's.
Speaker 6: Going to be doing the new public private version of
Speaker 6: a CBDC. And once they know all your financial transactions,
Speaker 6: all the rest, any part of this puzzle, we give
Speaker 6: them pretty much total control over your life. But they've
Speaker 6: got so many different facets where they are monitoring and
Speaker 6: collating information about you that it truly is just overwhelming
Speaker 6: to even try to think about it. But again, it's
Speaker 6: the ignorance and the darkness that they have fooled everybody with.
Speaker 6: That's why it's so important what you're doing. And again
Speaker 6: the site is thrill Kill medicalcult dot com. And you're
Speaker 6: also on substack and people find that at zowe dot
Speaker 6: substack dot com. And it's very important for people to
Speaker 6: use this information try to wake people up as to
Speaker 6: what's going on. They've not only hidden stuff from people,
Speaker 6: but they have in terms of inoculation. The one thing
Speaker 6: they've inoculated you against is the truth, and they've inoculated
Speaker 6: you against questioning what they tell people. And that's why
Speaker 6: you need to try to wake people up with sites
Speaker 6: like Zoe's as well. So is there anything else that
Speaker 6: you would like to hit.
Speaker 12: I just if anyone is interested.
Speaker 11: I'm going to be doing a memorial for the people
Speaker 11: that we've lost to hospital protocols and vaccine injured, including
Speaker 11: women who may have had.
Speaker 12: A stillbirth or a miscarriage due to the shot.
Speaker 11: Oh yes, So if you go to my website, there's
Speaker 11: a page called vigil and if you'd like to submit
Speaker 11: a name of a loved one, you don't have to
Speaker 11: tell us anything more, just the name of a loved one.
Speaker 11: You could even just put you know, baby boy or
Speaker 11: baby girl if you like. And we're going to be
Speaker 11: lighting a candle in remembrance of your loved ones.
Speaker 12: So if you like, please go and submit a name
Speaker 12: and we will honor your.
Speaker 7: Lost It's important.
Speaker 6: We cannot forget what they've done to us, and we
Speaker 6: cannot forget those that they have killed. It's absolutely vital.
Speaker 6: Thank you so much for what you do. Again, Zoe Smith.
Speaker 6: Her website is Thrill Kill Medical Cult dot com and
Speaker 6: you can find her on substack at Zoe dot substack
Speaker 6: dot com and she spelled Zoe Zowe. The Common made
Speaker 6: they created common Core, dumbed down our children. They created
Speaker 6: common Pass to track and control us. Their commons project
Speaker 6: to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 6: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 6: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 6: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 6: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 6: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 6: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 6: time to turn that around and expose what they want
Speaker 6: to hide. Please share the information and links you'll find
Speaker 6: at the davidknightshow dot com. Thank you for listening, Thank
Speaker 6: you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please
Speaker 6: keep us in your prayers. Ddavidnightshow dot com
Speaker 8: USTU