Speaker 1: You see something's going to happen.
Speaker 2: What what's going to happen?
Speaker 3: I'll think you.
Speaker 1: What I help.
Speaker 4: Welcome to the Occult Rejects today. I've got a guest,
Speaker 4: Ricardo Cavolaro, a published author big time into the occult
Speaker 4: and metaphysical and alternative energy. Tell them about yourself, Ricardo.
Speaker 1: Look good evening, and thank you for having me. Well
Speaker 1: for those that haven't heard it before, I've done research
Speaker 1: for I don't know, thirty five years, trying together as
Speaker 1: matty material as I can have on all disciplines. I'm
Speaker 1: not focused in one thing, but I try to find
Speaker 1: the connection between all things, which is different and Uh,
Speaker 1: I'm now working with the Institute for Natural Philosophy. We
Speaker 1: are trying to expand the global awareness and transmit knowledge
Speaker 1: to people in a way that they can take it.
Speaker 1: And basically that is I'm not very good talking about myself,
Speaker 1: but yeah, basically that that's it. It's it's it's more
Speaker 1: dive into the conversation than then about me. You got it.
Speaker 4: And then I got Nick my co host with the
Speaker 4: Occult Rejects and Ethan Indigo.
Speaker 1: Guys, introduce yourself.
Speaker 2: Thank you very much, Ellis for UH you know, getting
Speaker 2: this group together again. Guy would be here listen with you.
Speaker 2: So appreciate it and very much looking forward to this
Speaker 2: should be some really interesting talks and I'm sure it
Speaker 2: will make me think it more questions by the time
Speaker 2: the show's on.
Speaker 1: Thank you, we'll start it again then.
Speaker 5: Yeah, yeah, we all we all got sidetracked talking already
Speaker 5: off offline Ethan Indigo. Always excited to be here and
Speaker 5: communicate with you guys. I write, and you know, got
Speaker 5: all the social media, so reach out if I'm so inclined.
Speaker 4: Absolutely so, Ricardo, take us back to the beginning. Let's
Speaker 4: talk about megalists. Let's talk about megalithic technologies. What kind
Speaker 4: of interesting finds have you got in the realm of
Speaker 4: megalithic technologies?
Speaker 1: Okay, So if I would to start from the beginning,
Speaker 1: I would say there was nothing, and then suddenly there
Speaker 1: was something. So I would go to Graham anc sorry,
Speaker 1: to to Ennis McKenna and say science explains the beginning,
Speaker 1: saying give us a miracle and we will explain the
Speaker 1: rest because they don't know. They don't know the beginning.
Speaker 1: But in terms of megalytics, I think there are after
Speaker 1: these many years where academics have give us lots of material,
Speaker 1: not only in archaeology, but in astronomy that's very important.
Speaker 1: Archae acoustics, the involvement of geologists that tell us about
Speaker 1: the mineralogy of the stones used. The problem is they
Speaker 1: all look at this from independent size, so you don't
Speaker 1: put an archaeou astronomer discussing this with an archae acoustics
Speaker 1: guy or with an archaeologist. They don't mingle with one another.
Speaker 1: And that's why they don't get to the proper conclusions
Speaker 1: in my or the proper questions because we don't have answers.
Speaker 1: We have questions, but you need to have the right
Speaker 1: questions at least that take you closer to reality. And
Speaker 1: if you don't have all the data, you cannot make
Speaker 1: the right questions. So you need to understand the megalytic
Speaker 1: world and its beginnings. We need to understand first the
Speaker 1: kind of technology that they are using. First of all,
Speaker 1: you have to understand there is many years just to
Speaker 1: understand the sky. You have seventy two years for one degree,
Speaker 1: which means you have to go through the three hundred
Speaker 1: and sixty versus plus times seventy two, many times in
Speaker 1: order to see Oh, yes, it's confirming. We've seen it before,
Speaker 1: and there it is again. So this works. So that
Speaker 1: alone takes so many generations that when they talk us
Speaker 1: about the beginnings, they don't know what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: It's like saying, oh, go Beckley, Teppe is the beginning
Speaker 1: of agriculture. Yeah, they got there and said, ooh, I
Speaker 1: have this seaty in my pocket. I don't know how
Speaker 1: it gets here. Let me throw it aground and start agriculture.
Speaker 1: So that's not how it happens. This is a very
Speaker 1: slow process of trial and error and then perfection and
Speaker 1: and you keep perfecting the stuff, and it may take
Speaker 1: thousands of years. But in the megalotic world it's worse
Speaker 1: than that.
Speaker 4: It's actually worse than that because they don't admit that
Speaker 4: agriculture started at the time of go back you Tepi.
Speaker 4: They try to tell us that these people were all
Speaker 4: a bunch of cavemen who couldn't figure out how to put.
Speaker 1: Seeds in the ground. Exactly.
Speaker 4: That's who built that's according to them. So I mean,
Speaker 4: you tell me about the rest of their theories. When
Speaker 4: it comes to dating and explaining this stuff. They've got
Speaker 4: a lot of data, but they don't have really good
Speaker 4: explanations at all.
Speaker 1: Look, the problem is they don't even tell us about
Speaker 1: the fact that most of the crops that humans started
Speaker 1: developing and producing them existed naturally in a more reduced
Speaker 1: and less nutative form. So there were fields of this
Speaker 1: stuff that they getter. And then obviously when you start
Speaker 1: getting seeds and you start thinking, well, this comes from
Speaker 1: the seeds, let's try and plant the seeds. So you
Speaker 1: won't plant any seeds. You will select the seeds from
Speaker 1: the best plants, and you keep selecting the seeds from
Speaker 1: the best plants and so on, so you don't start agriculture.
Speaker 1: Agricultura began at the same time that we started harving
Speaker 1: natural agriculture, that was agriculture because they started helping the
Speaker 1: fields and so on, and that enters also the megalethic world.
Speaker 1: That is, as I always saying that the first thing
Speaker 1: you have to have the knowledge of the telluric energies,
Speaker 1: because all of these sites are placed in energy nodes
Speaker 1: that we today still don't know how to identify. There
Speaker 1: is a few methods that we can get closer to that,
Speaker 1: but we cannot still identify exactly a new note place
Speaker 1: without knowing that there was something there before. So this
Speaker 1: has a conjunction of elements that are not easy to perceive,
Speaker 1: especially if you considered the we are talking about cavemen,
Speaker 1: and these are faults, underground, faults river the river. When
Speaker 1: the river is present, you'll find that every single of
Speaker 1: these megalytics is on where the river bands. It's not
Speaker 1: on the straight, it's always on the river band. After
Speaker 1: you find all these generations to learn this technology of
Speaker 1: the place, then you have all these learning about the
Speaker 1: mineralogy because you have to have the correct type of
Speaker 1: stones to produce the functionality that you are trying to
Speaker 1: get from the site. So that's why you see some
Speaker 1: stones are taken from places that are seven yards away,
Speaker 1: and there are stones that are brought from three hundred
Speaker 1: kilometers away, so one hundred and sixty miles, sorry, one
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty miles. So there is a significance to that.
Speaker 1: This is not random. I don't say to a bunch
Speaker 1: of guys that don't have the wheel and say, look,
Speaker 1: I needed to go one hundred and eighty miles and
Speaker 1: get me some three or four stones from there because
Speaker 1: I just like them. It doesn't work like that, not
Speaker 1: even today it doesn't work like that. You said add
Speaker 1: to a constructor and it calls you crazy. Are you crazy?
Speaker 1: You have the quarry right here, whether I go all
Speaker 1: the way there. So it's not about building, it's about
Speaker 1: what you are building. And mineralogy is important. And for instance,
Speaker 1: you see a lot in the UK something that is
Speaker 1: wrongly called sarsen stones. A sargin stone is not a stone.
Speaker 1: Sarzin stone is the more pure form or quartz crystal
Speaker 1: there is. We can't make it any pure than that
Speaker 1: is naturally because this sarzin stone is a minimum of
Speaker 1: some say ninety eight point seven I found most references
Speaker 1: say ninety nine point three percent minimum pure quartz with
Speaker 1: then zero form zero point seven to zero point three impurities.
Speaker 1: You can't get that without being natural. And so they
Speaker 1: went to get far away to get these massive crystals
Speaker 1: that I recently found out. I don't know if you
Speaker 1: know this, but a ruby looks like a stone. It's
Speaker 1: not a ruby at all. People are throwing rubies away
Speaker 1: because they don't know they're throwing a ruby. Rubies have
Speaker 1: to have heat treatment to become that that ruby colored,
Speaker 1: translucid and glowing. They have to be heated before that
Speaker 1: they look exactly like a stone, exactly like a stone.
Speaker 1: It's not a crystal, it's a stone. We're looking at
Speaker 1: a PiZZ of stone. Contrary to Oh I brought them there. Okay,
Speaker 1: I have my quarts far away. So we now have
Speaker 1: the placement. You now have the mineralogy, and now we
Speaker 1: have to include sacred geometry, because all of these places
Speaker 1: are built under the rules of sacred geometry, and when
Speaker 1: you are building it, you are aligning the sacred geometry
Speaker 1: with the archae astronomy. So are you seeing that the
Speaker 1: vast lack of knowledge that is required to build a
Speaker 1: megalytic site.
Speaker 3: It's huge add on what you're saying. What you're saying
Speaker 3: makes me think about Goblecki Teppe as not only this
Speaker 3: sacred site where they might have done ceremonies and what
Speaker 3: have you, but in regards to the seventy two year
Speaker 3: cycle that must take place for them to even contemplate,
Speaker 3: or for us to even contemplate that there is shifting
Speaker 3: elements in the sky. So, from what I understand about
Speaker 3: Goblecki Tempe, each of these circular sites were little temples
Speaker 3: unto themselves that were associated with a point in the
Speaker 3: sky possibly more unlikely, and as time shifted, they would
Speaker 3: have moved these circular places potentially to I know this
Speaker 3: has happened in other sites anyway, and so I'm thinking
Speaker 3: that it has happened there. And so all these seventy
Speaker 3: two year sacred sites corresponding with the earth geometry and
Speaker 3: all these things that enabled them to really understand a
Speaker 3: lot of these bigger picture things that were revealed in
Speaker 3: megalithic sites later even right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but the alignment. We are told that the alignment
Speaker 1: is a virtualistic thing, when it isn't. The alignment is
Speaker 1: an energetic thing, and it reaches his peak during that time.
Speaker 1: That's why the ceremonies we're doing that time, not because
Speaker 1: the star was there, because that's when the energy is stronger.
Speaker 1: So continue, continue what I was saying. After you use
Speaker 1: the sacred geometry to build the site and align it
Speaker 1: to the elements that you wanted aligned, because this will
Speaker 1: create what is called today in science a quantum Oh
Speaker 1: dear Lord, I can't remember. It's like a quantum resonance.
Speaker 1: So after they align all of this and they create
Speaker 1: all this structure, then it only remains the last element
Speaker 1: and the last element is given by archae acoustics. There
Speaker 1: is the introduction to frequency into the site to activate
Speaker 1: the functionalities of the site itself. These functionalities are tellers.
Speaker 1: We get to learn from the academics right from the beginning.
Speaker 1: After three four sites then quickly understood that these sites work.
Speaker 1: Why what they call a trident of frequencies, meaning you
Speaker 1: have the natural frequency of the site, then you have
Speaker 1: the middle frequency that is introduced by the humans or
Speaker 1: whatever using the site, and then you have the search
Speaker 1: frequency that is created by the site itself as soon
Speaker 1: as the standing waves are made. Now, this is another
Speaker 1: point because the architecture is so perfect that it's very
Speaker 1: easy to create these standing waves. The standing waves is
Speaker 1: imagine a wave of sound that is always going like this.
Speaker 1: When you create a standing wave, the bouncing of the
Speaker 1: sound will stop that wave on the air. So you
Speaker 1: can put small balls as you do an acoustic levitation
Speaker 1: on that point of the wave, and the wave is
Speaker 1: stationary and he creates a new sound. This is very
Speaker 1: curious because this was found out by an individual that
Speaker 1: tunes organs pipe organs on chapels and churches, and so
Speaker 1: he decided to record himself because he really loved the
Speaker 1: acoustics of that chapel, and after fixing the organ, he
Speaker 1: played a music of his favorite and recorded it. When
Speaker 1: he got home, he realized that the church gave him
Speaker 1: a music that wasn't in the party two. So the
Speaker 1: music that we recorded by playing it was is not
Speaker 1: the music that he played. It's a new music. The
Speaker 1: resonance creates from the basic frequency the frequency place, and
Speaker 1: then the site itself creates another melody on top of
Speaker 1: it that creates the final tune. So this is exactly
Speaker 1: what is going on on megallythic sites. The difference between churches,
Speaker 1: chapels and so on and the megalethic site is that
Speaker 1: the megalethic side took the energy, use it inside and
Speaker 1: spread it outside into the fields. So this worked like
Speaker 1: electroculture that I'm not sure if everyone knows what electric
Speaker 1: culture is. So is this enrich the fields, the frequencies emitted,
Speaker 1: calm the animals. This is all scientifically seen in some places.
Speaker 1: It created a hive mind where all people are somewhat connected,
Speaker 1: as we still see in Alatri today and inside in
Speaker 1: the ceremonies. What's going on is very interesting because we
Speaker 1: are now discovered bring something called vibrational in printing. And
Speaker 1: this vibrational imprinting is when the site is on this
Speaker 1: site of activation, whatever is being done inside, it's being
Speaker 1: recorded by the crystals in the stone. We are doing
Speaker 1: this today in labs and we found out that you
Speaker 1: can even break the crystal and the information is still there.
Speaker 1: It's fractal. Once imprinted into the crystal, it stays there
Speaker 1: until the last fragment. So when these people talked about
Speaker 1: the gatherings and the ritualistic and talking to the ancestors,
Speaker 1: they were directly talking to the ancestors because they can
Speaker 1: receive or input this information from the site itself, so
Speaker 1: they could listen to their ancestors and their old ceremonies
Speaker 1: and the old stories that were told as long as
Speaker 1: the frequency was activated. More than that, since all of
Speaker 1: this is connected by the crystalline matrix of the Earth itself,
Speaker 1: all of these megaaletic sites are connected to one another,
Speaker 1: so there is no scientific blockage to the fact that
Speaker 1: they could communicate with one another. Once this quantum entanglement
Speaker 1: I found the word. This quantum entanglement is achieved because
Speaker 1: when you focus two points in the exact same signature,
Speaker 1: there is no time nor distance between them, so they
Speaker 1: are open to one another, and we found something of
Speaker 1: this sort. There's the experiment that I have already developed,
Speaker 1: and I already gathering a team and will gathering funds
Speaker 1: to do it in a few months. There is to
Speaker 1: return to West Kennet Long Barrow, where this Steve Marshall,
Speaker 1: this archae acoustics guy, placed a fourteen year old kid
Speaker 1: in the first chamber to the left, and then put
Speaker 1: a guy playing a drum outside on the courtyard. Because
Speaker 1: you already tried the year before playing music inside and
Speaker 1: it didn't work. There is no activation of the site,
Speaker 1: so it for the second year, he thought, okay, maybe
Speaker 1: you have to play it outside, and so he started
Speaker 1: introducing the music from the courtyard and he put a
Speaker 1: guy playing a drum four hundred and forty bits for
Speaker 1: a minute. What this child's testimony afterwards is that, you know,
Speaker 1: he was in complete darkness inside, but after a few
Speaker 1: seconds or almost a minute, after the drum is beating
Speaker 1: and he's coming down, he started to see the walls
Speaker 1: glowing with a kind of a black glow which is
Speaker 1: hard to define, but it started to see those stones glow.
Speaker 1: And after the glow came an opening that looked into
Speaker 1: another room that doesn't exist. It's the outside, there's nothing there.
Speaker 1: So a portal opened to another room, and the room
Speaker 1: was not empty. The kid got scared, closed his eyes,
Speaker 1: and for two times he felt someone coming from that
Speaker 1: room into the chamber was circle him twice, and because
Speaker 1: the kid didn't say anything, apparently respected the kid and returned.
Speaker 1: So the impressive thing of all of this, because the
Speaker 1: drumming stopped, the gate shut and so on, the impressing
Speaker 1: thing of all this is that I would have thought
Speaker 1: if I was Steve Marshall, I said, no, no, no, no, no, Look,
Speaker 1: we have to do this again, and we have to
Speaker 1: do this again with cameras inside. Let's put an seg
Speaker 1: in his brain. Let let's see if he's happening for
Speaker 1: real or if he's happening on his head. If he's
Speaker 1: happening on his head, it's like an obe experience. Can
Speaker 1: you have real happening happening inside his head? Can he
Speaker 1: get information? Can he have an experience? Or is it real?
Speaker 1: Did a real portal open up and we can actually
Speaker 1: go to another room?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: What it is was wrote it down and decided to
Speaker 1: repeat the experience with himself in it using headphones and
Speaker 1: binatural sound. Obviously it didn't work, but he says that
Speaker 1: it didn't work because it was the kid's imagination, although
Speaker 1: he recognizes that the kid had no reason to doubt
Speaker 1: and looked very honest. But he went there with headphones. Well,
Speaker 1: he did have an experience because what happened is what
Speaker 1: I believe. The site itself rejected him for using the
Speaker 1: wrong key, because this is the guy that can measure
Speaker 1: sits with his eyes, is well known for getting to
Speaker 1: a site and say that has she's x feet high
Speaker 1: x feet wide, and then when you go to measure,
Speaker 1: the guys is spot on. And he says on his
Speaker 1: own statement of what happened to him that he was
Speaker 1: projected three times four meters into the air when the
Speaker 1: ceiling is lower than two So he was thrown three
Speaker 1: times four meters into the air, and says the first
Speaker 1: time he was very alarmed, but then he's a scientist
Speaker 1: and said, now this has only happened in my head.
Speaker 1: So it happened again, and the third time, he says
Speaker 1: he was already relaxed and didn't feel any fear, and
Speaker 1: then he decided to terminate the experiment. So he was
Speaker 1: obviously rejected by using the wrong key into the site.
Speaker 1: The site was still consciousness that the conscious, let's put
Speaker 1: it that way. And so having a.
Speaker 4: Back like that would be enough for a lot more investigation,
Speaker 4: you know.
Speaker 1: Obviously multidisciplinary, that's what I have in my project from
Speaker 1: all fields. I even have an astrophysic that's the only
Speaker 1: guy already engaged and signed on if we read the project,
Speaker 1: signed me in because he wants to see if there
Speaker 1: is any astro connection during the ceremony.
Speaker 4: These are pretty handy when it comes to that. These
Speaker 4: are di sign and goggles and what you can do
Speaker 4: with these that is actually see the human energy field
Speaker 4: coming off of a person when you've got them on
Speaker 4: in very highlight conditions. If you were to be using
Speaker 4: something like this and those conditions, maybe turn on a
Speaker 4: light or something, you might be able to see this
Speaker 4: stuff if you're not capable of fully embracing the process.
Speaker 4: So he might have been getting a response, but his
Speaker 4: eyes aren't attuned to that kind of light, you know,
Speaker 4: his eyes aren't attuned to that kind of energy, so
Speaker 4: he's not saying anything.
Speaker 1: Yeah, But another interesting factor of all of this are
Speaker 1: the stone basins of water that appear in these sites
Speaker 1: that everyone thinks they are ritualistic, but no one perceives
Speaker 1: that they are strategically placed inside these chambers. They are
Speaker 1: strategically placed not on earths as the right of the
Speaker 1: rest of the site, but right on the bedrock. They
Speaker 1: always have a bit of bedrock to put this stone
Speaker 1: bases on. And what happens when you pour water into
Speaker 1: an environment that is being induced by frequency, If you
Speaker 1: use the right frequency, you can create what the anciente's
Speaker 1: called living water, what science is calling structured water, and
Speaker 1: what the very edge of science is now calling easy water.
Speaker 1: So you see all of these names for the same thing.
Speaker 1: Not even scientists understand each other, but the engines call
Speaker 1: it living water. So what this water is. It becomes
Speaker 1: kind of a gel and it's highly It has capabilities
Speaker 1: that we are now recognizing in water that also can
Speaker 1: absorb information. You can put data into structured water and
Speaker 1: he keeps it. So it's kind of a galadrial mirror.
Speaker 1: What I believe they did with this is you see
Speaker 1: all these engravings, these petroglyphs on these sites that are
Speaker 1: spirals others that have other motives to me, that is
Speaker 1: the key to with the activation of the site. That
Speaker 1: is the chimatics that you will see on the living
Speaker 1: water when you introduce the correct frequency. Those are the keys.
Speaker 1: So it's not an accident. When you go to there's
Speaker 1: a a chapel in the Saint Michael's line in the
Speaker 1: UK that stays right in the middle of this lay
Speaker 1: line of this telluric energy line, and you see that
Speaker 1: they this viated what they call the baptismal basins. They
Speaker 1: are deviated from what any architect would do just to
Speaker 1: be where the two lines cross, so it's instead of
Speaker 1: being on the center of the structure, is completely deviated
Speaker 1: to the side so that it's exactly where the two
Speaker 1: lines cross. So all of this is way beyond Christianity.
Speaker 1: All of this is way beyond some kind of of
Speaker 1: a belief. This is all technology. This is not a belief.
Speaker 1: This is technology, and they were using it for their
Speaker 1: own purposes exactly. That's what the catalicism and that's what
Speaker 1: the templars did. They reuse this technology once more in
Speaker 1: the year one thousand, one hundred and to the fifteen hundreds.
Speaker 1: They use this technology for their own purposes, and the
Speaker 1: templars and the catalogs, the papal ones. So the Vatican
Speaker 1: ones had different ideologies on how to use the technology
Speaker 1: because the Vatican only wanted one saying to convince people
Speaker 1: that God existed, and so they asked for composers like
Speaker 1: Bach to write specific tunes for specific churches that were played.
Speaker 1: And people get this sensation given by frequency of the
Speaker 1: site itself and the music of bliss, of contact with
Speaker 1: the divine, of being in with something that was higher
Speaker 1: than themselves, and these can create healing because of the
Speaker 1: fate of Placibo, because we control our body, it's not
Speaker 1: our body the controls us and so they use this
Speaker 1: to make enormous amount of money, an enormous amount of following.
Speaker 1: So the chance the sound was always a very important part.
Speaker 1: In fact, they used specific bells on the churches that
Speaker 1: gave people a sensation of when you are a drug
Speaker 1: drug addict and you don't have abstinacy, I don't know
Speaker 1: how to say.
Speaker 2: That, maybe withdraws or addiction.
Speaker 1: Yeah, when you don't have your dose, what do you
Speaker 1: call those people? They are having withs withdrawals, that's it, okay.
Speaker 1: So the people when the people who heard the bells.
Speaker 1: The hammer dropped every single because they were complexing to
Speaker 1: go to the church and have that sensation. When the
Speaker 1: war came, when we need to kill each other, they
Speaker 1: remove all the bells from the churches, all of them,
Speaker 1: so that effect was not felt. They changed the tune
Speaker 1: completely so it didn't have that effect on the body.
Speaker 1: So it was no longer that important to go to church,
Speaker 1: because what is important is to hate the Germans or whatever.
Speaker 1: Uh and vice versa, because these guys work on all
Speaker 1: sides of the fence, even from up and below. Uh. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: it was more than half an hour, but when I
Speaker 1: reached the end.
Speaker 2: You're just a quick question. Do you think understanding and
Speaker 2: trying to like use this technology is sometimes like kind
Speaker 2: of behind the scenes of these supposed wars or arguments
Speaker 2: we see between other countries.
Speaker 1: Well, I believe that we started with what people call
Speaker 1: the gods themselves. I don't believe in neither gods in
Speaker 1: that sense or aliens. I believe that that there's other
Speaker 1: explanations that don't require either of them. And I think
Speaker 1: that well, whoever they were, not only are responsible for
Speaker 1: the creation of mankind. At least one of their sects
Speaker 1: is the other didn't agree. It's obvious, and I think
Speaker 1: that they started by ruling us directly, what we call
Speaker 1: the god kings. Then they saw that humans were growing
Speaker 1: very much so and they decided to retreat a bit,
Speaker 1: and then they were the god sons ruling. After the
Speaker 1: god sons, you see that there are only normal humans ruling,
Speaker 1: and they say by divine rights, so they are no
Speaker 1: longer sons of the gods, but they have divine rights
Speaker 1: to rule. And after that you came to politicians. So
Speaker 1: this is all the same chain of command and all
Speaker 1: controlled by the same person that was before the group whatever.
Speaker 1: So I don't think there is any changes in that regard.
Speaker 1: And with this I completely forgot what the question is.
Speaker 2: Oh, if you think that like understanding this type of
Speaker 2: stuff might have been behind like and that's so much,
Speaker 2: I guess world wars, but like you know, disagreements or
Speaker 2: people obtaining certain land or do you think that might
Speaker 2: be reasons behind that stuff?
Speaker 1: Well, I think it's the same explanation that you find
Speaker 1: on the Mara Bargato or the rig Veda. You see
Speaker 1: that when this when this when the first rule of
Speaker 1: this of these gods between quotes ended and they multiply,
Speaker 1: and they started dividing territory for all these warrior lords
Speaker 1: or whatever. At the same point they started bickering with
Speaker 1: one another and bringing the humans they have with them
Speaker 1: against the other guy with the other humans. So I
Speaker 1: don't think it's the little man that working in the
Speaker 1: fields or the or the guy hammering the iron or
Speaker 1: the guy doing the pottery that decided I don't like
Speaker 1: that tribe that let me work with them. This is
Speaker 1: other people that are bleeding and then take everyone with
Speaker 1: them into war. So the same thing that you see
Speaker 1: on those tales of these gods fighting one another is
Speaker 1: is exactly what you have now. There is interests. See
Speaker 1: for instance, in the Middle in the in the end
Speaker 1: of the Second World War, you have Portugal. The our
Speaker 1: vaults were filled with art and gold that the Nazis
Speaker 1: stored here. However, we were neutral and not so we
Speaker 1: are allies of of of the America, but remain neutral
Speaker 1: and we will keep money. We're receiving money and giving
Speaker 1: hate from from guys like I don't know if he
Speaker 1: was involved, but probably the Rothschilds, the chip Morgans and
Speaker 1: so on, giving money to both sides, so that the
Speaker 1: war continues because what's matter is is the is the
Speaker 1: industrial military. We still have that problem today, especially in America.
Speaker 1: The complex, the military complex tries to rule the elections
Speaker 1: because they need war. Without war, there's no money. So
Speaker 1: although this is just at the tip of the iceberg,
Speaker 1: of course, on.
Speaker 4: The on the ancient alien tip, though, there is is
Speaker 4: a pretty significant discovery that's been going completely under the
Speaker 4: radar of most news agencies and people online. It's the
Speaker 4: discovery or it's the declassification of the mummies. I think
Speaker 4: they were found in Peru that are tridactyl, yes, and
Speaker 4: non human non human mummies that are tridactyl and they've
Speaker 4: got these things in Peru. I think that's pretty significant
Speaker 4: because they're basically saying, we don't know where these things
Speaker 4: are coming from, and they look kind of like this,
Speaker 4: so the elongated head and everything else, to me, it
Speaker 4: seems like we're already there, like that's that's case closed
Speaker 4: on this. It's like we had some sort of non
Speaker 4: human contact like these tridactyl meaning only three fingers mummies
Speaker 4: with the elongated head that are not human.
Speaker 1: Well, that's I.
Speaker 3: I haven't seen anyone refute any investigators with scientific degrees
Speaker 3: of varying sorts have been looking at those mummified bodies.
Speaker 3: None have been able to refute it. Many approached it
Speaker 3: with the intention to refute it.
Speaker 6: Being scientists.
Speaker 1: Of course, they don't support it either. They just.
Speaker 4: They just say, we're not going to talk about it.
Speaker 4: But this administrative culture that just declassified this and it's
Speaker 4: called Maria and Wawta, and those two mummies are now
Speaker 4: confirmed non human tried actally in mummies.
Speaker 1: They say the percentage they didn't They just because DNA
Speaker 1: Because every every human, if you do at the DNA tests,
Speaker 1: they present one to three percent of unknown DNA, which
Speaker 1: it's exactly the same that you are telling me, right,
Speaker 1: So that's wild.
Speaker 4: I just thought i'd throw that in because you know,
Speaker 4: it's pretty much confirmed at this point according to the
Speaker 4: Peru Ministry of Culture, that these are non human. Some
Speaker 4: sort of tried to act all elongated head.
Speaker 2: I haven't heard that.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I wanted to bring us going on related to the
Speaker 3: agricultural development and maybe even now that we are at
Speaker 3: this stage of our understanding of all these phenomena, maybe
Speaker 3: related to the future too. I've always wondered where did
Speaker 3: people get the idea to or or the comprehension to
Speaker 3: figure out which plants were medicinal. And I think the
Speaker 3: explanation for this always avoids the topic of intuitive understanding.
Speaker 3: And so maybe and maybe it was this one person
Speaker 3: had a certain illness and so they had an intuitive
Speaker 3: understanding of it, or maybe it was a broad understanding
Speaker 3: of plants in general. But I think that we belittle
Speaker 3: that to the point that we don't consider that in
Speaker 3: the development of the beginnings of agriculture and medicine, and
Speaker 3: also now with the telepathy tapes and coming out in
Speaker 3: coincidence with the many you know, validated people having a
Speaker 3: psychic relationship with these phenomenon, Right, It's like this is
Speaker 3: something that we overlook in our development, whether it came
Speaker 3: in spurts or was more more broad.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, I agree.
Speaker 4: I think ancient man used to have a very intense
Speaker 4: relationship to the plants around them, and having that kind
Speaker 4: of a relationship makes you able to kind of talk
Speaker 4: to these things. You know, you'll find in your own
Speaker 4: life if you're in the woods and you start talking
Speaker 4: to plants with your mind, you'll get stuff back. There
Speaker 4: is something going on there, and you can start that
Speaker 4: conversation that relationship with plants, and not just that, there
Speaker 4: are so many different ways of understanding how these different
Speaker 4: colors and shapes of the leaves and all the rest
Speaker 4: of this stuff play into the human body that is
Speaker 4: geometric in nature as well as you know, having to
Speaker 4: do with these associations of color and different parts of
Speaker 4: the body that are you know, really profound for their time.
Speaker 1: Look, I think, first of all, in regards to what
Speaker 1: Heasan was saying, you have a Chinese guy who's called
Speaker 1: the father of medicine, and he tried on himself more
Speaker 1: than ten thousand earths on himself, and that's how we
Speaker 1: found out about what they did. Obviously, either he was
Speaker 1: very wise or he was nearly killed several times because
Speaker 1: you don't try randomly ten I don't recall the number.
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's thirteen thousand, but it's above
Speaker 1: ten thousand herbs that he tried in his life and
Speaker 1: he lived two one hundred. So this guy had an
Speaker 1: amazing one knowledge and for the Chinese, he's called the
Speaker 1: father of medicine, and I think the same process might
Speaker 1: have been repeated not on people themselves. But as you
Speaker 1: were describing, now we know that this SRB does something
Speaker 1: to the stomach and helps with that. But this guy
Speaker 1: is having a different symptom. But it might also be. Sorry,
Speaker 1: just let me unplug this, but it might be. So
Speaker 1: let's mix this with the other thing that we know
Speaker 1: that goes to the other place of the body. Let's
Speaker 1: mix and let's see what works. Oh, we kill them
Speaker 1: next time. We don't do that. But I think it's
Speaker 1: very much a trial and error. And again I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that there is not times because I'm a defender
Speaker 1: of these two types of people that I don't consider
Speaker 1: neither aliens nor gods. I think that some of them
Speaker 1: are what I call the teachers and the others I
Speaker 1: call the slavers. I used to differentiate them by saying
Speaker 1: that you go to the megalithic world, or for instance,
Speaker 1: from much of Pichu, and what you find is everyone
Speaker 1: lived in exactly the same house. There is no social classes.
Speaker 1: There is only one person in charge, and that's the
Speaker 1: shaman or the elder or the wise guy. But it
Speaker 1: still lives among the others. There is no difference in
Speaker 1: social classes. And when you go to Anchor, what you
Speaker 1: find this megalomania megalomnia. I don't say it in English.
Speaker 1: Of this structure that looks like an evil motherboard and
Speaker 1: vast fields of agricultures to support ten million people. Why
Speaker 1: do you need ten million people? You don't need ten
Speaker 1: million people, You just want to have those ten million people.
Speaker 1: It's completely different. This is a society that is already unbalanced.
Speaker 1: It's already going to the point where we are today.
Speaker 1: There's too much on a specific place. And this is
Speaker 1: ruled by those that small walls with another walls inside
Speaker 1: two squares full of spikes that are clearly speaking of
Speaker 1: energy and its uses, and they don't seem to be
Speaker 1: a good use. So the other thing is I have
Speaker 1: to apologize to all vegans, but plants have feelings too too,
Speaker 1: and as they need to understand that, so they better
Speaker 1: starve because plants have feelings toew. And I can prove
Speaker 1: it because I repost constantly. What forced every single biologist
Speaker 1: and scientists the world to recognize that plants do think
Speaker 1: and even protect themselves. So you have this case in
Speaker 1: Kenya where kudus would appearing death dead everywhere. Hundreds and
Speaker 1: hundreds of kudus died, and they do They couldn't find
Speaker 1: a poacher they couldn't find an arrow, They couldn't find anything.
Speaker 1: Why the hell are these animals dying? So what happened
Speaker 1: was that the acacia that they climb on two foot
Speaker 1: to eat. As soon as the acacia feels that is
Speaker 1: himself is being eaten beyond the point where his herd
Speaker 1: to himself, he starts speaking to the other acacias and
Speaker 1: they start producing a venom into the leaves. So when
Speaker 1: the acasis moved to the other plant, they eat the
Speaker 1: plant and they die so they could not eat it anymore.
Speaker 1: And this goes for miles and miles and miles. As
Speaker 1: long as there is a casa on the way, they
Speaker 1: are communicating with one another. And so this was the
Speaker 1: point in ninety six, I believe where scientists this came
Speaker 1: on National Magazine when science had to admit that plants
Speaker 1: have feelings too. But I have another example. There is
Speaker 1: this plant that most people don't know because this was
Speaker 1: a trend, a trend perhaps per nerds. This was a
Speaker 1: trend perhaps fifteen years ago. There is this plant that
Speaker 1: when he hears music, it dances that anyone can buy.
Speaker 1: You can buy it online. So you put music and
Speaker 1: the plant starts moving very slowly, but it starts dancing,
Speaker 1: leaves up and down and he moves to the side.
Speaker 1: And you can go on YouTube the dancing plant and
Speaker 1: you find lots of examples of this. So this is
Speaker 1: not a creature that is without I dare say, consciousness.
Speaker 1: This is a creature that was developed naturally to enjoy music.
Speaker 1: Otherwise you wouldn't move. It moves for some reason when
Speaker 1: he hears music. And then you have the fungus. The
Speaker 1: fungus is the largest creature on the face of the earth.
Speaker 1: You have fungus that are hundreds of kilometers long, and
Speaker 1: a blue whale is just a tiny thing compared to
Speaker 1: that amount of fungus that exists under the ground. And
Speaker 1: that fungus connects all the trees on that wood, all
Speaker 1: of them. They communicate through the fungus. This is have
Speaker 1: been scientifically seen. The signals are being sent from tree
Speaker 1: to the fungus to a tree, and they communicate with
Speaker 1: one another. They feel what's going on on the inside.
Speaker 1: They know if there is bad weather, they know if
Speaker 1: there is people destroying trees. They know. So again, to vegans,
Speaker 1: please stop killing the plants, because plants have feelings.
Speaker 6: To That's really awesome.
Speaker 3: I wanted to just point out I appreciate your slaver
Speaker 3: and teacher dynamic, right, which which we see in mythology
Speaker 3: all over the world. Right. And and also of course
Speaker 3: to the polarity of that, there would be their supporters
Speaker 3: and the people not supportive of them too.
Speaker 1: Sure, there's always the one of these, there's always someone
Speaker 1: that preferred to stand on the on the what they
Speaker 1: believe is the strong side.
Speaker 4: It's interesting you mentioned that because I think it was
Speaker 4: Alexander the Great wrote a letter to Plato telling him
Speaker 4: not to put out philosophy to the general public because
Speaker 4: then it could make its way over to the enemies
Speaker 4: of that nation and be used against them. So they
Speaker 4: were talking about the educators and the enslavers back then
Speaker 4: in very broad terms. And what was the reason back then,
Speaker 4: national security.
Speaker 1: What do you think they're doing to us now, Oh,
Speaker 1: nothing of the sort. They wouldn't do that to us.
Speaker 1: They wouldn't hide anything from the public.
Speaker 2: So transparent.
Speaker 6: It's just shameful.
Speaker 3: I forget if it was earlier before we started recording,
Speaker 3: when we were discussing the essentially the elimination of all
Speaker 3: the information pertaining to the technology revolution that would have
Speaker 3: could have been right. For the last sixty years, there's
Speaker 3: been stifled, and we're in this place where we only
Speaker 3: look at materialism, and thereby do we really look at gravity.
Speaker 3: We're kind of just kind of steered away from that
Speaker 3: because it's an intangible as well, and we're really just
Speaker 3: focusing on these tangibles.
Speaker 1: Well, we focus on what we are given to focus with,
Speaker 1: and if we are not given these different technologies, we
Speaker 1: cannot even most people cannot even imagine them. But we
Speaker 1: weren't recording, so I will repeat it here. We are
Speaker 1: going to space by filling a tube with highly explosive liquid.
Speaker 1: We sit at top of it, and then we light
Speaker 1: a mash behind it and control the explosion by a motor,
Speaker 1: and so will be explosions foot poof, poop, poof, and
Speaker 1: there it goes to space. This is our technology. This
Speaker 1: is ridiculous. So it makes no sense that were on
Speaker 1: the twenty first century we are still using a cannon
Speaker 1: ball to reach space. That's what we are doing. We're
Speaker 1: putting something that explodes. We learn to control that explosion,
Speaker 1: because that's what the engine is there to do, is
Speaker 1: to control the explosion. That's all it does. It controls
Speaker 1: the explosion at will, and they transport people up like this,
Speaker 1: sit it on top of this highly explosive liquid, and
Speaker 1: accidents have happened and will continue to happen because the
Speaker 1: slightest error in the engine and that explosion goes wrong
Speaker 1: and boom it finishes. So and when it happened to Columbus,
Speaker 1: that terrible explosion that killed everyone, when we were all
Speaker 1: seeing it going to space at that time, several scientists
Speaker 1: on NASA said, look, this is old technology. We have
Speaker 1: so many projects we can start developing as in regards
Speaker 1: to new proposal systems. Let's put some money into that.
Speaker 1: Let's research this. And they did for two or three
Speaker 1: projects that still came with some results, but they were
Speaker 1: quickly finished because they have no interest in developing them.
Speaker 1: They have an even interest that they discover how it
Speaker 1: actually worked, so they stopped them before that. As soon
Speaker 1: as they've seen results, Oh it's useless, that's end the
Speaker 1: funding and that's it.
Speaker 6: Well, I heard that.
Speaker 4: They did put a satellite into orbit recently that has
Speaker 4: a different type of hydrogen drive. So they're using electro
Speaker 4: gravetta to create a slight pressure differential using these.
Speaker 1: Charged molecules coming out the back.
Speaker 4: Of it, and you know, in a vacuum you can
Speaker 4: actually pick up a lot of speed in that way,
Speaker 4: so that they're not you know, using the solid state
Speaker 4: fuel anymore. And these things can be charged with the
Speaker 4: with the you know, the two what do you call them,
Speaker 4: the two solar panels, right, And so they're trying out
Speaker 4: this type of technology, but only in space. I mean,
Speaker 4: where's the applications here? And they're not looking into electrogravitics.
Speaker 4: I mean, we've got demonstratable examples right now of electrogravitics
Speaker 4: being on board with the battery that's powering it, which
Speaker 4: is I.
Speaker 1: Think that's a huge step.
Speaker 4: All it is is just a differential between a positive
Speaker 4: electromagnet on top and a negative electromagnetic on the model,
Speaker 4: and so those two together create a sort of lift.
Speaker 4: Well they said, oh, that's there's no future there. But
Speaker 4: it's like there's so many different variations that you're not
Speaker 4: even paying attention to that you go along with this
Speaker 4: that they just sort of right off as being well
Speaker 4: that that's pseudoscience. How could it be pseudoscience if it's
Speaker 4: working to create.
Speaker 1: Left it's well, you have you have for instance, they
Speaker 1: developed this probably twenty years ago. You have a like
Speaker 1: a parabolic made of tissue stain that goes in front
Speaker 1: and it's consuming the vacuum. The thing that it's supposed
Speaker 1: to don't have anything. And what it does it passes
Speaker 1: it through an accelerator that works by those two different
Speaker 1: differentials and concentrates that flux of electrons and that coming
Speaker 1: captured by by that parabolic thing, and it ejects it
Speaker 1: higher velocity from from the backpoint and it creates exponential acceleration,
Speaker 1: which means they could get to any speed they want
Speaker 1: as long as they have space to go accelerating. That
Speaker 1: was terminated too. So there's so many technologies out there
Speaker 1: that we are not using. And one of them that
Speaker 1: I think is crucial is people are using electric cars
Speaker 1: today and I'm not sure if they realize that the
Speaker 1: batteries that they are using, the slightest contact that liquid
Speaker 1: that is inside the slightest contact with air produces a flame,
Speaker 1: and that flame is not possible to extinguish. It will
Speaker 1: burn as long as there is liquid. Now we have
Speaker 1: at least for seven years now what is called the
Speaker 1: solid state batteries. They last longer, they charge more, they
Speaker 1: don't explode, they don't burn in contact wear. Because they
Speaker 1: are solid, they're lighter. So why aren't you using them?
Speaker 1: Why because we put so many lydium iron batteries that
Speaker 1: we have to sell them all in order to start
Speaker 1: putting the solid set batteries in the cars. And the
Speaker 1: cars will cease to have one hundred kilometers range when
Speaker 1: they do, and start having six hundred or seven hundred
Speaker 1: kilometers range. So because we are not doing this because
Speaker 1: there is a lot of leadium batteries. There's a new
Speaker 1: law in the UK they are trying to approve that
Speaker 1: says they are going to put balloons inside the car
Speaker 1: tanks to limit the tank to twenty liters by twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five because it's unfair to electric cars. Okay, and yes,
Speaker 1: they're going to put balloons by law into the tanks
Speaker 1: because it's unfair to the electric car to have less
Speaker 1: range than a petrol engine or a diesel engine. Shee so,
Speaker 1: And they are doing this under the radar because according
Speaker 1: to their law, people can say I don't want this
Speaker 1: and they cannot approve it. So it's going under as
Speaker 1: much under as its possible, so they can approve this
Speaker 1: and more how do you design yeah, the same law,
Speaker 1: how do.
Speaker 6: You how do you even think of to do that?
Speaker 6: Go through?
Speaker 2: Like what kind of what's going on in someone's mind
Speaker 2: for that manth equation to equal that answer?
Speaker 4: It's Ricardo. What's the first country that's going to make
Speaker 4: mandatory castration legal?
Speaker 1: When is that going to happen? Because it seems like
Speaker 1: that's the way Europe is going.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that's it is.
Speaker 3: It reminds me of a dystopian novel where the good
Speaker 3: speakers are made to hinder something on their jaw and
Speaker 3: and and the good athletes are made to wear weights
Speaker 3: or whatever?
Speaker 6: Are you do?
Speaker 1: You know this headless?
Speaker 3: Yeah?
Speaker 4: Yeah, the idea that this insane equality is going to
Speaker 4: lead to people chopping off their own legs because somebody
Speaker 4: was born with that leg.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I forget the name of the book. But it's
Speaker 3: like they finally realize that it's ridiculous and break free
Speaker 3: of it.
Speaker 1: Of course, that was popularized in a movie by having
Speaker 1: a highly condecorated military guy be presented to Hitler to
Speaker 1: congratulate him in person because he killed one hundred guys
Speaker 1: or whatever it was in just one fight, and and
Speaker 1: Hitler congrelates congrelates him or whatever it's I can't say
Speaker 1: the word congratulate. Congratulated him, And as soon as he did,
Speaker 1: he turned to the side and says, taking downstairs and
Speaker 1: shoot him. And the guy was perplexed, looking at him, like,
Speaker 1: what have I done? What have I done? Well, my son,
Speaker 1: I am sorry, but you are demoralizing the troops. You're
Speaker 1: giving a bad example. The other man can't do that,
Speaker 1: so they need something that they can follow. So this
Speaker 1: is not real. This is this is satire. But but
Speaker 1: it's about that that you are talking about. It's an
Speaker 1: interpretation of that concept. We need people to to be
Speaker 1: all normal. And when I say normal, I mean stupid.
Speaker 1: That's that's what.
Speaker 6: Well we get.
Speaker 3: We conflate and get confused. Equal rights with equal capability. Right,
Speaker 3: we don't need that does there's no necessary But it
Speaker 3: doesn't start there.
Speaker 1: It doesn't start there. The problem is this. You grab
Speaker 1: children and you create a law that forced them to
Speaker 1: go to school right at three age, three years old
Speaker 1: or five years old, and then from five to nine
Speaker 1: you destroy every single bit of creativity they have insight,
Speaker 1: You just destroy it completely. After you do that, you
Speaker 1: create a new system in their mind from the first
Speaker 1: grade to what here is the first it to to
Speaker 1: the sorry, to the fifth grade, to the seventh grade.
Speaker 1: You create a system in their minds that they don't
Speaker 1: need to question. They just need to memorize. There's no
Speaker 1: need to bring anything to the table because it's all
Speaker 1: there on the book and it's all what the teacher
Speaker 1: is saying. And then from that point, when you finish college,
Speaker 1: your brain is a machine that can memorize and dictate
Speaker 1: what you what you learned. But what you learned is
Speaker 1: going to serve you for nothing on the real world.
Speaker 1: It doesn't have any practical use beyond the diploma because
Speaker 1: you get to the job that you studied for and
Speaker 1: when they start presenting it what you have to do,
Speaker 1: you have no idea how to do it, no idea
Speaker 1: at all.
Speaker 3: So it makes me think it's like we're learning all
Speaker 3: grammar but no logic and no.
Speaker 1: Rhetoric that we memorize nothing. It's it's just I just
Speaker 1: can't emphetasize enough. How many Darwins, how many Fulcanellies, how
Speaker 1: many Newtons, how many bach how many da Vinci's, how
Speaker 1: many of these? It's Ricardo.
Speaker 4: I think what he's talking about is the trivium, and
Speaker 4: the trivium is grammar, logic, and rhetoric. And so what
Speaker 4: ends up happening is they take the rhetoric out of school.
Speaker 4: So they teach you mathematics, but they don't teach you
Speaker 4: any practical application. All of the things that they're teaching
Speaker 4: are sort of vague and conceptual and not really something
Speaker 4: you can do with your hands, because it's that something
Speaker 4: you can do with your hands that opens up new possibilities.
Speaker 4: And we've taken rhetoric completely out and they even list,
Speaker 4: you know, how little it's going to be worth in
Speaker 4: all the rest of media. It's like, well, why did
Speaker 4: I have to learn this? I never used algebra two.
Speaker 4: It's like they make fun of the fact that, yes,
Speaker 4: your mind is being taken up, and some of the
Speaker 4: most productive years of your life are being taken up.
Speaker 4: I thinks that have absolutely no practical application.
Speaker 1: Looka I have I have an academic that wrote to
Speaker 1: one article for our first magazine, far Us. His name
Speaker 1: is Stephen Moore, and he's a mathematician, and he taught mathematics,
Speaker 1: and so he developed a new kind of mathematics that
Speaker 1: surprised him by having results that he was not expecting.
Speaker 1: So he took some vectors, calculated, created an equation that
Speaker 1: took vectors, positioning the angles and so on, and produced
Speaker 1: a number that are coordinates. And when you go and
Speaker 1: see what their coordinates lead to, we find another place.
Speaker 1: And then you do apply the calculus again and get
Speaker 1: another set of cordinates. And therefore there was another site.
Speaker 1: And he was marveling himself with this and decided to
Speaker 1: create a massive a massive paper that I don't members
Speaker 1: was six hundred pages or something like that, where you
Speaker 1: put all the sites, all the mathematics, all the equations,
Speaker 1: all the connections, that we put it to peer review.
Speaker 1: So the first answer it gets is, we are really sorry,
Speaker 1: but we can't look at your thesis because the relation
Speaker 1: you are making into mathematics and the sites couldn't exist
Speaker 1: because they didn't have mathematics. So if you take that off,
Speaker 1: then we might look at it. And so it took
Speaker 1: six hundred pages out and left just the mathematics with
Speaker 1: no relation to ancient sites, just the mathematics, and you
Speaker 1: apply the peer review for the mathematics. He received the
Speaker 1: reply saying, we are sorry, but we cannot avaliate your
Speaker 1: work because the mathematics you are describing in your paper
Speaker 1: do not exist, have not been invented yet. I did
Speaker 1: invent it. It's there, I make it. You just need
Speaker 1: to see if it's real or not if it works. No,
Speaker 1: it hasn't been invented yet. It was there on the paper.
Speaker 1: So what they mean is the guy that created that
Speaker 1: mathematics is not one of ours, so it doesn't exist.
Speaker 6: Right.
Speaker 4: That changes everything, you know, I mean having a basis
Speaker 4: of mathematics that works on a different level of conception
Speaker 4: and our reality. That means that you could start to,
Speaker 4: you know, approach topics that are far more complex with
Speaker 4: that framework in mind. Well, where's the framework? If there's
Speaker 4: no framework, how do you approach these other topics?
Speaker 1: Look? How much? How much one of you should know this,
Speaker 1: because I don't remember the exact number. How much of
Speaker 1: our DNA is considered garbage.
Speaker 3: Lot?
Speaker 1: Seventy eighty percent?
Speaker 6: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I think I think it's bordering perhaps the eighteen ninety percent.
Speaker 1: It's around there. But even if it is seventy percent,
Speaker 1: we are believing people that are telling us that we
Speaker 1: have this highly complex double helix form that is crystal.
Speaker 1: For those who don't know a DNA is made of crystal.
Speaker 1: So there is a crystal thing that we have embedded
Speaker 1: in us that dictates many of our functions and our
Speaker 1: growth and looks and so on. Looks not so much,
Speaker 1: but yeah, but so on. And they say they understand
Speaker 1: all of this because they understand twenty three percent of it,
Speaker 1: and we are believing them. How the hell if I
Speaker 1: go to you and say, look, I have this problem
Speaker 1: and I realize twenty three percent of the problem it's solved.
Speaker 1: You can present this to everyone. We already know all
Speaker 1: we can. The rest doesn't matter. The seventy seven no, no, no,
Speaker 1: scratch that, that's garbage. I can back.
Speaker 6: I can't figure out that out.
Speaker 1: Just publish that. Now.
Speaker 4: Are you sure you're not talking about medical efficacy because
Speaker 4: the tiunds like you're talking avacy. They have like fifteen percent.
Speaker 4: Oh that's effective. Give it to everybody.
Speaker 1: So when when they ask, this is public? So I
Speaker 1: don't have any problems in saying it is. When when
Speaker 1: they brought the guy doing the experiments with the animals
Speaker 1: to Congress and they asked him, please explain this. Why
Speaker 1: did you stop the experiment? And he replied because the
Speaker 1: animals were dying. Oh so you stopped the experiment because
Speaker 1: the animals were dying, and then he approves it immediately
Speaker 1: to humans. It makes sense obviously, why not? I'm sorry
Speaker 1: I asked. It's so stupid of me. Of course it
Speaker 1: wasn't because of that.
Speaker 2: Oh that's that's actually, that's fucking crazy.
Speaker 1: This is on public record. Do you see this being
Speaker 1: used by anyone. This is on public record.
Speaker 4: That's what they did with the boosters.
Speaker 1: They're still the agencies that protect the animals. The associations
Speaker 1: that protect the animals said no, no, no more, please
Speaker 1: give it to humans. We've the goddamn animals alone.
Speaker 2: I can see that. That's crazy.
Speaker 1: So this this, These are the clever, wise, respectful, hero
Speaker 1: like almost godly people that are ruling humanity right now.
Speaker 1: This is this is the wisdom. They are the priest class.
Speaker 4: I mean, what else do you call a guy in
Speaker 4: a white robe that you're not allowed to question.
Speaker 1: That's a priest. You can question him and you'll get
Speaker 1: one answer. How hot is the fire when you're tied
Speaker 1: to a steak? Right?
Speaker 3: Well, And a big part of Edward Burnet is using
Speaker 3: doctors as edless and you guys, I'm sure no is
Speaker 3: to portray them as unquestionable and verifiable professional know it
Speaker 3: alls of the medicine field. They would say. They would
Speaker 3: have doctors in doctors coats, smoking a pal mall and saying,
Speaker 3: this is the one that's good for you.
Speaker 1: Look, this is what he's being used for. I don't
Speaker 1: know how many years by guys that give those speeches
Speaker 1: of empowering yourself or something like that, self health speeches.
Speaker 1: What happens is one of the first six things that
Speaker 1: these people have for the very few that will understand
Speaker 1: what they're saying, because the rest are just there to
Speaker 1: give him money. The three or four that will understand
Speaker 1: what he's saying and they will make some money from
Speaker 1: the money they spent to be there, is the ones
Speaker 1: that understand when he's saying that it doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: you understand the subject that you are speaking or not.
Speaker 1: What matters if other people believes you understand what you're
Speaker 1: talking or not. That's all that matters. So when you
Speaker 1: have people a person of authority, he is used to
Speaker 1: speak freely because even if he's saying something he know
Speaker 1: nothing about it, people say, oh, thank you very much,
Speaker 1: is the wisdom of this guy. I can't believe it
Speaker 1: and they don't know what they're saying, because it's a
Speaker 1: matter of humans are engineered to be gullible. They are
Speaker 1: engineered to be easily manipulated, and the few of them
Speaker 1: that have some kind of genes that doesn't allow them
Speaker 1: to be easily manipulated are very hard to climb in life.
Speaker 1: They will be secluded by everyone else because they are
Speaker 1: not understood. It's like, it's like this. Imagine that you
Speaker 1: are of a race that you are telepathic. Okay, so
Speaker 1: everyone is telepathic. The problem is your difference is that
Speaker 1: you can block your thoughts. You can hear everyone else,
Speaker 1: but you can block them from hearing you. And this
Speaker 1: is what happens. These people don't understand you because you
Speaker 1: are in a different level of understanding of reality. You
Speaker 1: mingle with them, but as soon as you reveal your
Speaker 1: understanding of that same reality, they say, sorry, I have
Speaker 1: a pressing appointment. I have to go. Uh.
Speaker 4: Because the worst part is, I don't know if you've
Speaker 4: seen these videos from the OMG right where they go
Speaker 4: around to these people who are in professional positions inside
Speaker 4: the government, and when they're off duty, they always admit
Speaker 4: that there are huge problems in the regulatory agencies. There's
Speaker 4: huge problems with doctors. There's huge problems everywhere, but they
Speaker 4: never dare say that on television. You know, it's only
Speaker 4: when they're on hidden camera that they actually admit how
Speaker 4: terrible the industry is from the inside. And it's like,
Speaker 4: these are the people running this thing. They all know
Speaker 4: these problems, they all admit to it on hidden camera,
Speaker 4: but you can't get a single one of them to
Speaker 4: tell the truth.
Speaker 1: I don't have this. I don't have this recording, but
Speaker 1: I have a friend of mine that has it. Fourty
Speaker 1: years ago in a meeting from a group that I
Speaker 1: believe either the Buildingberg Group or the Trilateral Commission. Those
Speaker 1: that don't know what this is don't know how the
Speaker 1: world is ruled. So I advise you to go and
Speaker 1: look for those two groups. That's how the world is ruled.
Speaker 1: Visibly above them, we don't see much but a police
Speaker 1: to where you can see those are very much on
Speaker 1: the top. So after the meeting was recorded to reporters,
Speaker 1: one of the reporters asked the guy, look, we are
Speaker 1: off camera now, which they weren't. Could you please give
Speaker 1: us something that you spoke. Spokes spoke and you said nothing,
Speaker 1: So could you give us something of your ideas? What
Speaker 1: are the plans of how you see the future. And
Speaker 1: the guy looked, he looks to the sides, not recording,
Speaker 1: when there was one guy recording still, and he says,
Speaker 1: I will tell you this, we are going to make
Speaker 1: boys and girls the same. And they did. And this
Speaker 1: was forty years ago. So when do I hear people, Oh,
Speaker 1: if there was an elite ruling the world, they would
Speaker 1: rule it years ago. Yeah, you are absolutely right. They're
Speaker 1: ruling it for at least three or four thousand years,
Speaker 1: if not more, the exact same guys just passing it
Speaker 1: on unless they die. So it's either you see it
Speaker 1: you don't.
Speaker 3: There's a fictional story called the Red Star.
Speaker 6: It is a.
Speaker 3: Russian science fiction novel way early and it is apparently
Speaker 3: the origination for why the military of the Soviet Union
Speaker 3: and now Russia used the Red Star. And in this novel,
Speaker 3: the character is he's looking for the ideal communists country
Speaker 3: and he meets some guys from Mars and they take
Speaker 3: him to Mars where it is the ultimate communist utopia. Finally,
Speaker 3: and men and women are barely perceptible as different. Is
Speaker 3: one of the mono thematic. Kind of themes that can't
Speaker 3: come is in that book.
Speaker 1: You remind me of something there is very basic. You
Speaker 1: know how many mentions of the real gravity of the
Speaker 1: moon exist in the academic world. One the only place
Speaker 1: you find the real gravity of the moon is in
Speaker 1: the book written by Vondon Brown that is repeated and
Speaker 1: quoted in a small publication the inside NASA itself. That
Speaker 1: paragraph was repeated once more, and that's the only time
Speaker 1: the real gravity of the Moon was revealed. Why I
Speaker 1: know this because when I researched for the Moon, I
Speaker 1: started wondering, these guys are either missing the moon or
Speaker 1: hitting the moon real fast. There's something in their calculations
Speaker 1: that it's not right. Because what matters when you go
Speaker 1: to the moon is what is called the neutral point.
Speaker 1: The neutral point is when you stop accelerating and you
Speaker 1: start decelerating, and you have to know exactly where that
Speaker 1: point is in the distance so you don't slam onto
Speaker 1: the Moon or go way beyond it. That happened multiple times.
Speaker 1: So when they even created a satellite, they had balls
Speaker 1: wood balls that were ready to resist the impact in
Speaker 1: bedrock at two hundred miles an hour, okay, and resist
Speaker 1: and the sensor that was inside would still work on
Speaker 1: the moon. They never got a signal. They hited the
Speaker 1: Moon so fast that it shattered though not even those
Speaker 1: balls survived. And then they missed it, and then they
Speaker 1: hit it again, and I hit it again, I hit
Speaker 1: it again until they finally landed. And when they finally landed,
Speaker 1: they realized they were the neutral point was completely offset
Speaker 1: because the real gravity of the Moon is not sixteen
Speaker 1: percent of the Earth, it's sixty four percent of the Earth.
Speaker 1: Some points gave readings of sixty six points sixty six
Speaker 1: percent of the Earth regard. So why is this? I
Speaker 1: don't think they are even showing this to other space agencies.
Speaker 1: You still see new space agencies sending things to the
Speaker 1: Moon and hating or failing the Moon completely because they
Speaker 1: don't have this data. Because every single book says sixteen percent.
Speaker 1: And when you do the equation, the neutral point is
Speaker 1: not where the actual neutral point is. It's because it's hollow.
Speaker 4: I mean, so, I mean that's the thing. When they
Speaker 4: hit it, they hear it ring for like what three hours?
Speaker 1: Yes, I mean it's not it's not hollow. It's a ship.
Speaker 1: It's a terraforming ship. Right, Well, it's the ship, the
Speaker 1: truck that brought the slavers from from Mars, that was
Speaker 1: inhabitable because they destroyed it when they entered the system.
Speaker 1: They destroyed Phaeton, the planet that is now the asteroid belt.
Speaker 1: The biggest chunks are missing, although astronomers are saying, no,
Speaker 1: that was not a planet. The Greeks were crazy that
Speaker 1: all those blocks together won't make just a small moon. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but the big blocks impacted everything. Where do you think
Speaker 1: that the spot on Jupiter came from. That's an impact
Speaker 1: that's larger than the Earth itself. Do you imagine the
Speaker 1: chunk that created that, that that vortes that's still happening
Speaker 1: in Jupiter. Whatever took the atmosphere evaporated all the water.
Speaker 1: Half of Mars was filled with water. They are now saying, okay,
Speaker 1: we we were wrong. It's true. You cannot refute this.
Speaker 1: It was filled of water. So when they did this,
Speaker 1: instead of going to Mars, that's where the Sidonia, where
Speaker 1: the pyramids are, where the faces are and so on,
Speaker 1: they have to go to the Earth. The Earth had
Speaker 1: no moon. And because the Earth had no moon, you
Speaker 1: can go and see this online. The Earth's rotation was
Speaker 1: so fast that you have incredible winds, storms all the time.
Speaker 4: Eight hours a day instead of twenty four.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so you couldn't create evolved life in such a planet.
Speaker 1: So what they did was they brought they crawled their
Speaker 1: damage ship to the earth, slowed it down to a
Speaker 1: speed they could, and then populated according to their needs.
Speaker 1: And that included at some point looking at, oh, let's
Speaker 1: see what's the animal here that's more suitable for us
Speaker 1: to create a servant, and they find probably an erectus,
Speaker 1: or maybe the erectus was already a manufacturer or the
Speaker 1: because it wasn't the Australopy texts for sure. So they
Speaker 1: use that creature to create another being. But these are
Speaker 1: the ones that I call the slavers, and this is
Speaker 1: what I call the original sin, because these creatures also
Speaker 1: have a code and they know they should never create
Speaker 1: life of their own. And that's the original sin that
Speaker 1: you see distorted on religious books. It's not what we're told.
Speaker 1: The original sin is the creation of man itself. And
Speaker 1: then you have the other side. There is the teachers
Speaker 1: that are the guys that were here when they arrived,
Speaker 1: and they were the guys ruling life on this section
Speaker 1: of the universe on this galaxy, and they kept fighting
Speaker 1: one another until finally the teachers clearly lost what I
Speaker 1: is what I call the long defeat. They might still
Speaker 1: some of them be alive together today, but the Draconians,
Speaker 1: the Slavers, clearly one, there's no doubt about it. They're
Speaker 1: still in control.
Speaker 4: If you look at the mythology of the what are
Speaker 4: they called the I was gonna bring up Varracoca, that
Speaker 4: was the Incas, and so you've got this Verrakoca character
Speaker 4: repeated all around the you know, South and North America,
Speaker 4: and they kind of talk about these these teacher figures
Speaker 4: that go to war with some kind of a in
Speaker 4: the Aztec tradition with kettl Quado, he's fighting tescatale PoCA,
Speaker 4: which is like this being of dark energy or whatever,
Speaker 4: and so he's got the same sort of symbolism going
Speaker 4: on all over all over the place, type of characters
Speaker 4: over and over again.
Speaker 1: I truly believe that these slavers, whatever they were, they
Speaker 1: started dividing territory and spreading through the world, in each
Speaker 1: one creating their own dynasties and their own cultures. And
Speaker 1: the rusts is because they all came from the same race,
Speaker 1: and so the beginnings of civilizations are more or less
Speaker 1: the same because that's what they were and what they
Speaker 1: had to give to the people. And then after that
Speaker 1: it starts evolving, and it's humans themselves that developed that
Speaker 1: after they're being abandoned by these people going only go
Speaker 1: to the shadows.
Speaker 4: Well, how much mixture do you think there is between
Speaker 4: human and alien blood? So I think there's probably a lot.
Speaker 4: You know, over time that's going to make a difference
Speaker 4: in terms of what is able to from the other.
Speaker 1: That's a very interesting question and leads us to what
Speaker 1: we've just said before. That is they say that the
Speaker 1: chimpanzee has ninety eight percent of our DNA, but they
Speaker 1: are only seeing twenty five percent of the DNA, So
Speaker 1: where's the rest?
Speaker 2: Yeah, think about that. That's really such a small changes.
Speaker 1: Yes, we have to think that when they say that
Speaker 1: we have the tenty eighty the same, they are not
Speaker 1: giving us the other seventy seven or eighty percent of
Speaker 1: the DNA. We don't know about what.
Speaker 4: About the other one hundred percent that they're not giving us.
Speaker 4: With the electromagnetic frequencies and how they impact these different
Speaker 4: DNA strands.
Speaker 1: Sure, absolutely we are frequency beings. In fact, all this
Speaker 1: reality is based on on frequency and vibration. Everything we
Speaker 1: see is produced by some kind of vibration. So it's
Speaker 1: that saying that most people don't know this, but I'm
Speaker 1: going to tell them. You can never ever touch anything
Speaker 1: in your life ever. You can press your fingers as
Speaker 1: much as you want, you will never touch your fingers
Speaker 1: with one or another. Never. It just doesn't happen. The
Speaker 1: electromagnetic fields are compressing your fingers, but the skin will
Speaker 1: never touch. Did you know that it doesn't happen because
Speaker 1: the electromagnetic field. We think I'm touching this glass, I'm not.
Speaker 1: I'm touching the electromagnetic field of the glass, not the
Speaker 1: glass itself. Because these forces don't allow things to connect physically,
Speaker 1: because there is no physicality. It is energy. And one
Speaker 1: of the things that I used to prove that this
Speaker 1: is just this is just a BioSuit. It's not ourselves.
Speaker 1: Is that your brain that is little more than a
Speaker 1: connector and a regulator that although it can hold five
Speaker 1: percent of resusual consciousness. I'll give you that because most
Speaker 1: people live about with those five percent of consciousness, believing
Speaker 1: that that's themselves. But I can prove that because there
Speaker 1: is an experiment there is called the rubber harm. The
Speaker 1: rubber harm, yes, And so you put a person in
Speaker 1: a small cabinet and you place his right arm outside
Speaker 1: of the cabinet, and inside the cabinet there is a
Speaker 1: rubber harm with fingers with a hand with everything. Okay,
Speaker 1: So what they do is they'll start, do I have
Speaker 1: two things here? They start to poke fingers on the
Speaker 1: rubber hand and your real hand at the same time,
Speaker 1: different fingers, different points of the hand, but always on
Speaker 1: the same place, both on the rubber hand and your hand.
Speaker 1: So explain to me why they can't stop pinching the
Speaker 1: real hand and you keep feeling the exact point on
Speaker 1: the rubber hand. They are not picking your real hand anymore,
Speaker 1: and they're still feeling it. And they finish the experience
Speaker 1: with a hammer normally in the hand, not because they
Speaker 1: want to create that reaction, but because they need to
Speaker 1: break the spell or you might lose the control of
Speaker 1: the arm, your real arm. So they shock you. They
Speaker 1: hammer the hand, and people say, oh, my arm, and
Speaker 1: then they are grabbing their real harm and not the
Speaker 1: rubber one. That's how does the experiment terminates. But your
Speaker 1: brain can immediately connect to another piece of material and
Speaker 1: tell you that that is you, because the material doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: What matter is the field is the energy that you
Speaker 1: are believing when you are entering your BioSuit, what you
Speaker 1: believe is you. It's all about perception. It's not about reality.
Speaker 1: It's about perception. It's a completely different thing. So I
Speaker 1: understand that most people believe in death, for instance, or
Speaker 1: in getting old. Don't I don't believe in that. I
Speaker 1: think that's a social construct. We are built since child
Speaker 1: to believe that people grow, go old, and die. That's
Speaker 1: what we see. That's our perception. But it's up to
Speaker 1: us to say I don't agree with that. I like
Speaker 1: this here, I don't want to go anywhere, and I
Speaker 1: want to keep my physique. So let's stay like that,
Speaker 1: because we are in charge. It's not the body, it's we.
Speaker 1: Of course, we can give it good food, good water.
Speaker 1: For instance, I only drink nine point five pH water.
Speaker 1: Why because any kind of bad disease cannot live in
Speaker 1: an alkaline body. They just don't survive. And everyone has
Speaker 1: cancer through their life two or three times and don't
Speaker 1: know it. The problem is some people eat too much sugar.
Speaker 1: And cancer feeds off that sugar. The more sugar you
Speaker 1: give it, the more it will grow because it's highly acidic,
Speaker 1: and this kind of disease need acidic environments to develop.
Speaker 1: If you have an alkaline body, they cannot develop. They
Speaker 1: die simply, they cannot survive in an alkaline body. Well,
Speaker 1: I've heard studies about that.
Speaker 4: What they say is that if it's alkaline alone, then
Speaker 4: you're not getting as many benefits as if there's hydrogen added.
Speaker 4: So the hydrogen is like the activator of because we
Speaker 4: don't actually digest hydrogen anymore. All of our bodies are
Speaker 4: made of hydrocarbons, right, But that hydrogen as a form
Speaker 4: of nutrient is it present in our bodies because that
Speaker 4: was particular to a specific type of gut floor.
Speaker 1: We don't have anymore.
Speaker 4: So all of the hydrogen is basically not being absorbed
Speaker 4: in our foods, so you actually have to breathe it in.
Speaker 4: So if you add hydrogen tabs to your alkal and water,
Speaker 4: you actually activate the effect, which is.
Speaker 1: No, I didn't know that, wonderful. I didn't know that.
Speaker 1: Another thing that people don't know, and this is quite
Speaker 1: a simple thing that everyone can do, is do not
Speaker 1: consume mineral salt, and I explained why because mineral salt
Speaker 1: is made of three things. Only sodium chloride is that
Speaker 1: give that salty taste, silica and glass. This is what
Speaker 1: mineral salt is made of. So what happens is when
Speaker 1: you put mineral salt on your food, those crystals will
Speaker 1: dissolve when you do the digestion, but they will not
Speaker 1: dissolve at all completely, so they will enter your bloodstream
Speaker 1: and they will scratch your veins from the inside. The
Speaker 1: silica and the glass scratch the vein from the inside.
Speaker 1: And this cause what pharmaceutics are making a lot of
Speaker 1: money called cholesterol. Why because cholesterol is the natural body
Speaker 1: response to repair the veins. So the veins are being
Speaker 1: scratched by the salt. They are creating that grease that
Speaker 1: is the ceiling of the vein that we have that
Speaker 1: process naturally, that fatness, and when people keep adding fat
Speaker 1: to that and more salt and more fat to that,
Speaker 1: they have the problems that they have. But it's not
Speaker 1: about fat in the beginning, It's about the salt. So
Speaker 1: I strongly recommend that everyone look for a good source
Speaker 1: of marine salt water in an actual beach or extracted
Speaker 1: by manual processes and not purified in anyway. You can
Speaker 1: buy it even with a little bit of salt water inside,
Speaker 1: for sure if you look at for it. So the
Speaker 1: difference is a marine salt has this very same eighty
Speaker 1: eight allego elements that composite your blood. Isn't that wonderful?
Speaker 1: It has the exact same eighty eight alligo elements that
Speaker 1: we have in our blood, Which means that if you
Speaker 1: have someone dying, you can dissolve a little bit of
Speaker 1: salt into water and create a serum that will save
Speaker 1: his life. You put mineral salt in that solution and
Speaker 1: you kill it immediately.
Speaker 4: Have you ever looked at it? Have you ever looked
Speaker 4: at the zeolite?
Speaker 1: No? I don't know what that is. Please tell me.
Speaker 4: What you do is you add a bunch of salt
Speaker 4: to water until you hit the saturation point. Then you
Speaker 4: add I believe it's a type of baking powder.
Speaker 1: I believe it's baking powder. It could be baking powder,
Speaker 1: baking baking soda, baking soda.
Speaker 4: You add that and then all of those crystals come
Speaker 4: down into a new mixture that they call zeolite, which
Speaker 4: actually is like a fertilizer. So it's like it transforms
Speaker 4: the salt into a fertilizer, which is strange, but you know,
Speaker 4: this is how they would fertilize some fields using the
Speaker 4: zeolite formula.
Speaker 1: So I think that's kind of interesting.
Speaker 4: You're using the sea salt, you know, if you're if
Speaker 4: you've got it, or just adding a bunch of salt
Speaker 4: to get it to that brind point. But yeah, you
Speaker 4: get a lot of those those benefits, which is just
Speaker 4: adding another chemical.
Speaker 1: To it exactly.
Speaker 3: Another really powerful nutrient that is little known is shilgit
Speaker 3: and silogit. Silojit is a mineral compound which can be
Speaker 3: found in often in Indie yuh, but but it can
Speaker 3: be found variously in mountains, I believe. And it looks
Speaker 3: like a petroleum product, but it is water soluble and
Speaker 3: it's a mineral oil if you will, that has all
Speaker 3: all the nutrients we need, and it also has the
Speaker 3: effect that our cellular structure opens up to obtain the
Speaker 3: nutrients and potentially medicinal herbs that you might combine with
Speaker 3: the shie legit and makes our body really receptive and
Speaker 3: able to use medicinal herbs for instance. More more properly,
Speaker 3: and it's a foundational element to are you are your
Speaker 3: vedic medicine too? You know, and I know this is
Speaker 3: changing the CUSSC, but I wanted to ask Ricardo, can
Speaker 3: you tell us more about what's going on, what you're
Speaker 3: doing in Portugal and maybe some of your recent travels,
Speaker 3: were you've been going and what you've been doing.
Speaker 1: It's funny that you asked, because I thought that this meeting.
Speaker 1: At first, I thought it was at eight o'clock mine.
Speaker 1: I think I wanted to think that because I wanted
Speaker 1: to go to tomorrow to see a main templar site,
Speaker 1: and so it would give me time. But then I
Speaker 1: realized that it was not at eight, it was at four.
Speaker 1: In fact, it wasn't at four, it was at five.
Speaker 1: But because it was at four, I had to get
Speaker 1: to the site, and I was planning to do the castle.
Speaker 1: There is there a templar garden that I would like
Speaker 1: to see too, and then there is an Almorrole castle.
Speaker 1: There is a castle in the middle of an island.
Speaker 1: That was my last place to go. So I just
Speaker 1: saw the templar site, the first one. I didn't get
Speaker 1: the time to look at the other one. It's about
Speaker 1: an hour to each side of traveling, and I can
Speaker 1: tell you that I've seen magnificent images of that. It's
Speaker 1: called a sherrola, or is a roundabout, and this is
Speaker 1: the place where supposedly in the IPOGM, behind this sharrola,
Speaker 1: this roundabout, it was where the templars were securing what
Speaker 1: they call the grail. And I'm not talking probably of
Speaker 1: the physical grail, because there are two grails. There are
Speaker 1: the technological one and there's the physical one. So which
Speaker 1: one of those I don't know. But the thing is,
Speaker 1: no image that I saw online prepared me to what
Speaker 1: the site is in person, because if these people were
Speaker 1: supposed to be destitute and without any intentions of ostentation,
Speaker 1: then they failed miserably because the site is beyond regal.
Speaker 1: It's beyond regal. Is unbelievable. The richness of the architecture,
Speaker 1: doctor the gold, the paintings, the details, it's just it's
Speaker 1: just unbelievable. I don't think I can let me see
Speaker 1: if I have anything here that I can show you,
Speaker 1: So you have an idea what I'm talking about that
Speaker 1: this is just an image to give you an idea. Yeah, wow,
Speaker 1: So this it is behind. It is beneath this that
Speaker 1: they secured their most precious treasure. It's just it's just unbelievable.
Speaker 3: This.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the image are still raw, but I think you
Speaker 1: can get this was all in true gold. This was
Speaker 1: gold paint. H you see if I have whoops, Nope,
Speaker 1: like this. So this is on the side. You have
Speaker 1: to keep in mind, this is not even twelve hundred.
Speaker 4: That recessed doorway is pretty interesting. You see that a
Speaker 4: lot in Peruvian cultures where they would describe a portal.
Speaker 4: So they'll have these places inside of caves that have
Speaker 4: that recessed archway like that, and they would call those
Speaker 4: things a portal, and they say that certain drumming can
Speaker 4: activate it, which is exactly like you were talking about.
Speaker 3: It really does look like those stone carved out portals. Good, good, eye,
Speaker 3: that's beautiful. Well, that's amazing.
Speaker 4: Wow, it is a slobrity.
Speaker 1: Yeah, look at the ceiling. They don't they don't allow
Speaker 1: us inside. But this is I stretch my arm. This
Speaker 1: is what can be seen from the ceiling.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 1: This I think is one of the original paintings. Is
Speaker 1: very h pladed. And now we get to this, Why
Speaker 1: the hell in the functional side of the building. There
Speaker 1: are two huge pipes. There's another one just like it
Speaker 1: on the other side. Tell me, please, it doesn't have
Speaker 1: anything to do with sound, no whatsoever. Look at the side.
Speaker 1: Look at the size of the pipes. Okay, h.
Speaker 4: Interesting, that is so low that would be like a
Speaker 4: very low hurt.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Infrafrequency, that's that's produce in you fre frequency.
Speaker 1: That's that's the required And most of the sites it's
Speaker 1: the four herds. This is the old part already ruined.
Speaker 1: Some writings from the eleven hundreds. Did you go in
Speaker 1: the cave underneath? That's this structure you see, That's where
Speaker 1: we were inside. That's that. Look look at this. Look
Speaker 1: at this letter. This is tone.
Speaker 2: No, that's what being broke looks like. What the fuck
Speaker 2: are we?
Speaker 1: Look at that?
Speaker 4: You That is incredible. That looks like something out of H. R.
Speaker 1: Geiger. You right, This is on the opposite side of
Speaker 1: the shill of that roundabout. That's exactly the opposite side,
Speaker 1: on the same on the same room. Isn't that a portal?
Speaker 3: It reminds me, although I've been thinking about it a
Speaker 3: lot recently, it reminds me of the circumpunct.
Speaker 1: Right, Absolutely gorgeous. Look at what the shades bring out,
Speaker 1: especially on this one. When I use the flash, you
Speaker 1: don't you don't get those that you get.
Speaker 4: He looks like an angel and it looks like God
Speaker 4: and the devil.
Speaker 1: Hey, there's a there's a tongue coming out here. Process
Speaker 1: church march right? What have I been saying? This had
Speaker 1: an acoustic You won't believe the acoustics of this place
Speaker 1: is just unbelievable, unbelievable. Wow, it's full of water. That's
Speaker 1: where it's at. Dude, I'm telling you. The Greeks know it.
Speaker 4: That's why in all their temples all the action was
Speaker 4: going on in the basement, like the Allucinian Temple and
Speaker 4: several other places. The the esclapion all took place on
Speaker 4: the ground.
Speaker 1: This is the main the main courtyard. Wow, oh can
Speaker 1: you see the letters? And you don't see because of
Speaker 1: the fountain, all these little details. The ceiling has hundreds
Speaker 1: of these sinks, on on on on on the sides
Speaker 1: where the beams find themselves. There's not two that are
Speaker 1: the same. They're all different.
Speaker 4: It's that same candlestick motif, though.
Speaker 1: It looks like a face. Where go back one one more? No?
Speaker 1: Right there?
Speaker 4: Wait here no, no, no, go forward for that one.
Speaker 1: This one now it is a face. Look in the archways,
Speaker 1: that's what I'm talking about. They are all different. This
Speaker 1: thing's here, that's what I'm showing. Each one of these
Speaker 1: things is different, all of them. I just took a few,
Speaker 1: but they are all different.
Speaker 4: And so this has been maintained for eight hundred years.
Speaker 1: Yes, and rebuilding the fifteen hundreds and sixteen hundreds with
Speaker 1: added parts.
Speaker 4: Wow, were they broken up in the thirteen hundreds.
Speaker 1: Not in Portugal. This was the last place.
Speaker 4: Oh wow, So that's what all the treasure is.
Speaker 1: They don't allow us to go down, unfortunately. But I
Speaker 1: took the image just to spot where the place underground is,
Speaker 1: at least in this century.
Speaker 4: Yeah. So the Catholic Turturs broke in the thirteen hundreds
Speaker 4: and they wanted to get at the treasure of the
Speaker 4: knights Templar.
Speaker 1: But the templars were independent in Portugal. They're interesting to
Speaker 1: have received orders from the Vatican. That's why they were
Speaker 1: in Portugal. Right, that's why Portugal is called for you Grail,
Speaker 1: it's poor to growl. That's what in the Seal of
Speaker 1: the origin of Portugal.
Speaker 3: Wow, I never saw that It literally says it in
Speaker 3: the name of the country Portugal.
Speaker 6: Wow, in the seal.
Speaker 1: In the seal that was the treaty they signed with
Speaker 1: the Templars to create Portugal, because they helped the king
Speaker 1: to created it. So it clearly says I'm translating verbottom,
Speaker 1: it says for you Grail in Portuguese, it would be
Speaker 1: poor to Gral.
Speaker 6: Amazing.
Speaker 1: That's let's let me see if I have any So
Speaker 1: are the videos?
Speaker 4: So by extension, what does that make Brazil?
Speaker 1: Brazil was a fifteen hundreds new place to.
Speaker 4: Rob Are they sort of still under the protectorate.
Speaker 1: Of uh no, no, no, they are the dependent and
Speaker 1: the completely independent. Look look at this thing?
Speaker 6: Epic Wow, well.
Speaker 1: Right, crowded, conquered child. See if I have one from it?
Speaker 1: Seems I don't have older videos here, So I think
Speaker 1: I bored you enough with.
Speaker 6: This astonishing astonishing.
Speaker 4: There's so many links to all this other occultism that
Speaker 4: you can see in just the basic detail of this place.
Speaker 1: What about this door? This door, for instance, is from
Speaker 1: seventeen seventeen oh three.
Speaker 3: Look at that sheeez mesmerizing? Is it going in or
Speaker 3: coming out? That?
Speaker 6: It looks like.
Speaker 1: At this door is to the roundabout.
Speaker 6: That's a badass do.
Speaker 1: It's it's it's it's a very impressive place for sure.
Speaker 4: Really, could you imagine decoding that place?
Speaker 6: M hm.
Speaker 1: They'd even they don't even allow us to go to
Speaker 1: the church. Mhm. The church is next to the Shirola
Speaker 1: and not only you have to pay a ticket, you
Speaker 1: cannot bring any recording device inside.
Speaker 4: I wonder why so I gotta ask you about Malta
Speaker 4: and been to the Knights of Malta.
Speaker 1: Yeah, the Malta Temple there, No, no, never been there.
Speaker 4: It's a very similar scenario. That place is just as
Speaker 4: loaded because you know Knights of Malta again, they were
Speaker 4: the Knights Hospitality of the next thing.
Speaker 1: Yes, they go all the way back to the same
Speaker 1: time period. Let me tell you about this form. There
Speaker 1: is this guy that anyone that goes and research to
Speaker 1: the templars, there's a very big guy called Walding Pais.
Speaker 1: Walding Pis is like a night in the real sense
Speaker 1: of the word, which means he's also is a fighter
Speaker 1: and a musician. And by magic, I'm not talking about illusionism.
Speaker 1: Magic is science that we don't understand that. That's the different.
Speaker 1: Illusionism is tricks of the hand and speed magic is
Speaker 1: something that we don't fully understand. And so what this
Speaker 1: guy did is they wanted badly to have Portugal and
Speaker 1: to have territory here and created like a haven for
Speaker 1: themselves here the Templars. And so even before the Templars
Speaker 1: were actually officially created, the mother of the guy that
Speaker 1: I'm going to talk about, the mother of Fonsine Ricks,
Speaker 1: had already been contacted by the Templars, by a representative
Speaker 1: of the Templars before order made. So this is important.
Speaker 1: She was contacted if she would give them land in
Speaker 1: change for their services in securency, it's securing the land
Speaker 1: around her. So she was the daughter of the king
Speaker 1: of Castile, that was the largest kingdom in Iberia, and
Speaker 1: because she was a bustard daughter and he probably didn't
Speaker 1: like her very much, he gave her a small piece
Speaker 1: of land that it's called Porto College that still today
Speaker 1: has a port wine with that brand that is what
Speaker 1: is today is a portal. So that was the small
Speaker 1: area that this kingdom, this small conduct or kingdom had
Speaker 1: very small and so they contact her and she said, yeah,
Speaker 1: I give you a piece of land, and so they
Speaker 1: came and installed themselves in that land, and when she
Speaker 1: had the son, unfortunately the child came crippled. She would
Speaker 1: never walk in her life. And so walden Pie, for
Speaker 1: some reason came to her and said to her, if
Speaker 1: you give your child to me for me to raise
Speaker 1: and educate, I will heal your son. And she said,
Speaker 1: if you can heal him, you can have him. And
Speaker 1: so he took him and two weeks later returned with
Speaker 1: the boy healed. Which is the part that the historians
Speaker 1: doesn't care for. But it's all there, with the same
Speaker 1: parts that they care for. It's all on the same text,
Speaker 1: all in the same parts. Okay, not funny how they
Speaker 1: do that? Yeah, amazing. So the boy is healed and
Speaker 1: is raised by walding Pies in the mystic arts, in
Speaker 1: the world of art of war and all of that.
Speaker 1: And when he boy is eleven, is taken to Spain
Speaker 1: to the highest cathedral of the templars of the time
Speaker 1: and he unites himself and by doing so, he's saying,
Speaker 1: I don't recognize any power above myself. That's why he
Speaker 1: unites himself at eleven years old. See the mentality of
Speaker 1: this kid. So he comes back to Portugal as a
Speaker 1: king without having land and the first thing it is
Speaker 1: is he conquers the land of his mother, and then
Speaker 1: he starts conquering land to the moors at a speed unimaginable.
Speaker 1: His small armies against gigantic armies of the Moors, and
Speaker 1: he slashed the armies down, and he kept slashing them
Speaker 1: until he gets to Tomorrow, where I've been, and then
Speaker 1: they kept doing it until he get to Cintra. That's
Speaker 1: the other place we talked before. So this guy, although
Speaker 1: he was educated in all of this, I think he's
Speaker 1: a bit of a numskull because the last battle he's
Speaker 1: been with and just to give you an idea of
Speaker 1: the man, he's told in our legends that his sword
Speaker 1: was one hundred kilos, which means he's two hundred pounds.
Speaker 1: In reality, we found out that he sort is more
Speaker 1: like eighteen kilos, which is thirty six pounds. But I'm
Speaker 1: a swordsman, and I guarantee you you cannot will a
Speaker 1: sword with that kind of weight you don't have arms
Speaker 1: to it. The guy did it while wearing armor that
Speaker 1: weighed seventy pounds on top of him. Okay, So what
Speaker 1: this guy did in the last battle he was in
Speaker 1: was the castle was not opening the door, and he
Speaker 1: was doing a siege, and he was tired of waiting
Speaker 1: to demolish the gate of the castle and said, I'll
Speaker 1: do it myself, and he charged at all speed with
Speaker 1: his horse against the door and slams violently against the door,
Speaker 1: killing the horse, injuring himself, but not opening the door right,
Speaker 1: But it survived, and he came walking, limping a little
Speaker 1: bit back to the army, but he came back. So
Speaker 1: this was the first king of Portugal, the wise guy
Speaker 1: educated by the Golden Pies himself. So that gives you
Speaker 1: an idea that he was healed on the legs, but
Speaker 1: they couldn't heal mind. But it was a fantastic, fantastic fighter,
Speaker 1: and that's what they use him for. So that that's
Speaker 1: a funny story about about how Portugal get related with
Speaker 1: the Templars. That's how it happened.
Speaker 4: Isn't it funny how childhood trauma can be turned into
Speaker 4: something that transforms the person. I think that's what's going
Speaker 4: on there, is like you've got you know, mystic healing,
Speaker 4: and you've also got this brainwashing kind of thing, you know,
Speaker 4: So they could have demonized the guy. I mean, that's
Speaker 4: something that's common in SRA victims today. What they'll do
Speaker 4: is they'll split the personality and then have one be
Speaker 4: taken over by some sort of infernal deity, you know,
Speaker 4: that whole thing. It sounds like they could be using
Speaker 4: a mix of both.
Speaker 1: Yeah. My question is that demonic being insight internal or external?
Speaker 1: Does it come from the mind itself or does it
Speaker 1: come from the outside. Is it an impersonation of the
Speaker 1: reptilian brain.
Speaker 4: Well, it doesn't necessarily have to be demonic. I mean
Speaker 4: the word.
Speaker 1: I'm using the money because you use that, but it
Speaker 1: can be anything exactly. It's neutral.
Speaker 4: I mean, what they're doing is they could be using
Speaker 4: like a higher spirit and dwelling there too. But if
Speaker 4: you look around today, all they're trying to do is
Speaker 4: make everything worse. You know, That's why you get all
Speaker 4: this demonic possession and all this other stuff is because
Speaker 4: all they're trying to do is make people worse.
Speaker 1: Look, if you deprive people of their true self by education,
Speaker 1: you leave the space open to everything else.
Speaker 6: Cool, very true.
Speaker 1: Considering that most people are working in what is I
Speaker 1: say five percent? It can be three or two or
Speaker 1: one or ten whatever, I say five percent. Most people
Speaker 1: are grounded in the brain five percent. That's why they
Speaker 1: focused on materialistic things. And they keep people in this
Speaker 1: frequency by saying war, warmeringly, crime, fear, depression, inflation, chaos, pain, suffering, death.
Speaker 1: This is a constant. You don't see news saying a
Speaker 1: new bloom of this plant has just occurred, isn't it magnificent?
Speaker 1: Have you looked at the rainbow today? We have rain
Speaker 1: but we also have the rainbow, so we only look
Speaker 1: to the negative side of things. You don't see news
Speaker 1: about good things. You only see news about neutral and
Speaker 1: most of them are bad things. It's like they say,
Speaker 1: they use this system for as many years as television exists.
Speaker 1: That is, when they have to give you a bombastic news,
Speaker 1: they say, well, and so when new virus has come up,
Speaker 1: you are all going to die. Go to football, So
Speaker 1: how is that game today? And that's how they do it.
Speaker 1: They give you the most important piece of information they
Speaker 1: have and suddenly they move instantly to something else without
Speaker 1: giving any any explanation about it, and people just take
Speaker 1: it because football it just clicks that mind and you, yeah,
Speaker 1: my team, how is my team? I want to know?
Speaker 1: And notice the phrase my team. It's not your team.
Speaker 1: You don't win anything. When they win, you don't lose anything.
Speaker 1: When they lose. You might support them, but it's just
Speaker 1: that the fact that people in here. I hate football.
Speaker 1: My football is different from your football, but it's your soccer.
Speaker 1: I hate soccer not because of the game itself, but
Speaker 1: because it's a monoculture. You have people with medals in
Speaker 1: other sports that are starving because the government doesn't support
Speaker 1: them because it's not football. They have to train themselves,
Speaker 1: they have to take off their body, their money to
Speaker 1: train to go to the Olympics or whatever, and all
Speaker 1: is that effort, and the state never claims their name
Speaker 1: nothing while football whoa everything is football? Why? Because football?
Speaker 1: In my regard, I'm not an economic guy economics guy,
Speaker 1: but I'm pretty sure that a soccer team cannot give profit,
Speaker 1: especially in not in the hundreds of millions, because just
Speaker 1: in salaries alone, the amount of money that you have
Speaker 1: to take out every single month, plus the maintenanceing, plus
Speaker 1: the energy bills, plus the people that have to support
Speaker 1: all your installations, all of that personnel, it's in amount
Speaker 1: of money by months that is completely impossible to support
Speaker 1: by any sponsors. I don't care how many t shirts
Speaker 1: use you sell. If you're not selling weapons, if you're
Speaker 1: not selling drugs, if you're not selling illicital items like
Speaker 1: diamonds or whatever, you cannot make that amount of money.
Speaker 1: So to me, every big club that does football is
Speaker 1: mixed in something because no one checks the baggage of
Speaker 1: the players. No one checks the bus of the players,
Speaker 1: never no one checks the plane of the players. They
Speaker 1: go and pass everything because they are the celebrities, so
Speaker 1: they can cross really on these international games, the European
Speaker 1: Soccer and the World Soccer and so on. They can
Speaker 1: interchange whatever they want into anyone's country at will. They
Speaker 1: have to make money some behind, because it's not from
Speaker 1: from the club members that they are doing that money.
Speaker 4: Just as it makes a lot of sense when you
Speaker 4: consider Operation Gladio. I mean, what if Operation Gladio never
Speaker 4: went away from Europe, it just switched over into this
Speaker 4: drug smuggling operations. There's a lot of drugs in Europe
Speaker 4: and there's not a lot of drug fields, so they're
Speaker 4: not really producing of the drugs that they're consuming.
Speaker 1: You know, we don't let them grow. We just consumed them.
Speaker 2: Right, Don't grow that garbage around here, just consume it.
Speaker 2: I think if you guys are good, we're at it
Speaker 2: like a two hour mark right now. We could wrap
Speaker 2: it up with that. If anybody wants to hit anything, Yeah,
Speaker 2: I was.
Speaker 4: I was just gonna add, you know, one of these
Speaker 4: days the EU is going to pass a law creating
Speaker 4: mandatory castration, and that's gonna be.
Speaker 1: That's gonna be the end of the cycle.
Speaker 4: I think, make everything ugly and then finally lop off
Speaker 4: all the guys Wieners, you.
Speaker 2: Know, over real quick. I'll just toss it, I know over.
Speaker 2: And I think the United Kingdom they're going to start,
Speaker 2: they might start implicating a pre crime.
Speaker 1: Pre crime. Yeah, they're going to call Tom Cruise.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so yeah, they're talking about They even like mentioned,
Speaker 2: you know, Planet Palanteer, which is tel. They mentioned Ellison,
Speaker 2: and then like I can't remember exactly who, but they
Speaker 2: actually do coin a couple of the people as Zionists
Speaker 2: and you're like, oh, I didn't even know they were Jewish.
Speaker 2: But it's like, oh, okay, I guess they're asking Azi
Speaker 2: Jews because those holes seem to be Zionists.
Speaker 1: But what kind of drugs are they using?
Speaker 2: But I think it was like Elison to maybe Tilda
Speaker 2: I can't remember exactly who they called Zionists, but it
Speaker 2: was rather interesting when they was showing like exactly who's
Speaker 2: involved in this pre crime stuff and that the United
Speaker 2: Ings wives to take it over.
Speaker 3: I believe in England right now they're one of the
Speaker 3: most prevalent countries that is prosecuting speech offensive speech.
Speaker 6: If you will.
Speaker 3: Although some of it could be threatening, some of it
Speaker 3: could be I think some of it is just insulting,
Speaker 3: what we would consider in the States, just like an insult.
Speaker 4: We got we got the crime statistics back and all
Speaker 4: over Europe there have been fifteen thousand arrests for hate
Speaker 4: speech violations. Fifteen thousand people have been prison because somebody
Speaker 4: didn't like what they had to say online.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's this guy. This guy was filmed by his
Speaker 1: friend with the police arresting him because he made a repost,
Speaker 1: a repost of a post saying that the new land
Speaker 1: Rover were more capable than the old one. Ah, And
Speaker 1: so he was asking the cop are you are you
Speaker 1: for real? Because I just made a repost and it's
Speaker 1: just my opinion. Yeah, but you are making a lot
Speaker 1: of people upset of a car.
Speaker 6: It's his opinion of a vehicle.
Speaker 1: So this is insanity. This is insanity. That's that's what
Speaker 1: it is. It's insanity.
Speaker 6: That's what we reached.
Speaker 1: We destroyed music, we destroyed cinema completely. We grab, we
Speaker 1: grab millions and millions and millions of followers capable of
Speaker 1: giving us millions and millionions of dollars or billions of dollars.
Speaker 1: And we look at this audience and said, nah, we
Speaker 1: are not interested in money. We are interested in destroying this.
Speaker 1: And so let's destroy this narrative completely and get a
Speaker 1: new small number of fans that will like this, and
Speaker 1: let's obliterate everything that comes behind. And this is called
Speaker 1: Star Wars. This is what Disney did to Star Wars.
Speaker 1: They destroyed everything that Lucas did. And I remember Catherine
Speaker 1: saying to Lucas on record, saying, don't worry, because we
Speaker 1: are going to honor everything you did and respect your work.
Speaker 1: And he was even a consultor, a consult with in
Speaker 1: the in the beginning of the footage, and they kicked
Speaker 1: him out because he was giving opinions. So this is
Speaker 1: the state of the world. And they are doing this
Speaker 1: to every single thing that was a culture. They're destroying everything.
Speaker 4: I heard it was jar jar Oh god, I heard
Speaker 4: they kicked him out because he was so insistent on
Speaker 4: having jar Jo play this main character.
Speaker 1: So they're like get rid of him. He's gonna sick
Speaker 1: the whole thing.
Speaker 4: I don't think he wrote any of that stuff, to
Speaker 4: be honest. I think George Lucas is probably more and
Speaker 4: he was just given scripts.
Speaker 1: Yeah, now he's he has the manuscripts to prove that
Speaker 1: he created it all. In fact, at the beginning, he doesn't.
Speaker 1: He wasn't called Skywalker, He's called star Killer. In the
Speaker 1: first manuscript, the name of the boy were star Killer.
Speaker 1: So that is Look, I defend Lucas because of this.
Speaker 1: Lucas was a boss that take care of his employees.
Speaker 1: They don't get just a salary. They got a salary,
Speaker 1: a house, insurance, education for their sons, a vast prophet
Speaker 1: of the of the a vast percentage of the profits
Speaker 1: of the movies, and every single merchandise. He wasn't keeping
Speaker 1: all to himself because he was a guy that gives
Speaker 1: to everyone that work with him. And this is well documented.
Speaker 1: And so I'm not saying he's a good guy or
Speaker 1: bad guy. I say, in my vision, that is correct.
Speaker 1: That is well done. That's not what going on with
Speaker 1: other producers. So at least at that point, I defend
Speaker 1: the man because of that.
Speaker 4: Well, you know, in a lot of ways, I think
Speaker 4: we have to determine where art is going, and that
Speaker 4: takes all of us, you know, So we got to
Speaker 4: make those decisions.
Speaker 1: We got to keep away from the jump.
Speaker 2: Now, now.
Speaker 1: You put two pencils on a string, you put a
Speaker 1: piece of paper on the ground, you split a little
Speaker 1: bit of ink right from the can into the canvas,
Speaker 1: and then you let the two pencils make scratches on
Speaker 1: and you sell it for fifteen million. That's hard, that's art.
Speaker 1: So you go to a gallery. If you are appreciative
Speaker 1: of paintings, you go to a gallery and you start
Speaker 1: looking at those paintings and then start thinking, that is
Speaker 1: these people that did this on serious medication because she's
Speaker 1: not feeling well for sure, because that's not art. They're
Speaker 1: just rubbish. I can do that kind of rubbish, and
Speaker 1: I'm not that good at drawing.
Speaker 2: We must to see like the same video on Twitter,
Speaker 2: because I saw something like that too long ago, or
Speaker 2: I was like, these people doing this ridiculous shit that
Speaker 2: was considered art. I was like, yeah, for millions of dollars,
Speaker 2: Like there are places and people are watching them.
Speaker 1: I'm like this, really, look, we think that a lot
Speaker 1: of these people that we see coming to the Starlights
Speaker 1: that they appeared out of nothing. That is just a
Speaker 1: public phenomenon. You don't have a single case documented of that.
Speaker 1: All of these people have been showsen long ago, and
Speaker 1: they have been doing work from long ago until they appear.
Speaker 1: Even if you go to look to actors, that's suddenly
Speaker 1: like Mark Wohlberg, Oh no, I was a car thief
Speaker 1: and then suddenly I decided to go to acting. I
Speaker 1: didn't have actually had lessons, but I started making movies
Speaker 1: and you go and look into his life and he's
Speaker 1: been with these people for long. It was just a
Speaker 1: guy that's less easy to control. But he has been
Speaker 1: in the in the market of these fellows for long.
Speaker 1: And this goes for any of them. They are, from
Speaker 1: politics to actors to wherever you go find if they
Speaker 1: have a main part on social life, they have been
Speaker 1: engineered long ago to be that part. And some of
Speaker 1: them know that there are consequences. Why so many of
Speaker 1: them lose their child, there's a price to pay. The
Speaker 1: problem is what happens to that child, and that would
Speaker 1: lead us to a dinner cron and other stuff. But
Speaker 1: they are willing to do all of this to get
Speaker 1: where they want to be. So it's it's it's the
Speaker 1: to finish my my, my example that I dislike profoundly. REP. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I dislike it profoundly for one single reason. He has
Speaker 1: been turned from poety to hate. He has been turned
Speaker 1: into a mechanism that excites you into rage, into into rebellion,
Speaker 1: into against the law, not the system, but against the law,
Speaker 1: against figures of authority that in fact are just doing
Speaker 1: their job, being assholes or not. But what happens was
Speaker 1: when rep became became a sing and at the same time, coincidentally,
Speaker 1: and I keep saying coincidence, they explanning coincidentally, prisons became,
Speaker 1: uh business, so privatized. We're privatized. So what these guys that,
Speaker 1: what this system of prisons did was they called all
Speaker 1: of these high rappers into a room and told them
Speaker 1: and told them, look, we love your work, but we
Speaker 1: need you to do something for us from now on.
Speaker 1: If you want to have all the drug, all the girls,
Speaker 1: all the freedom to do whatever you want without any
Speaker 1: kind of consequence to you, you just have to start
Speaker 1: writing letters that incite people to commit crime, people into violence,
Speaker 1: into hate, into dissidence. That's what you have to start writing.
Speaker 1: And that's what happened, and prisons fell up because people
Speaker 1: are living this music. It's unbelievable. They hear it everywhere
Speaker 1: and then don't realize they're being machined into this state
Speaker 1: of feeling. Because music does have any effect on persons,
Speaker 1: it is frequency. So and that's why I just profoundly
Speaker 1: dislike a rep. And in regards to Raves, I found
Speaker 1: always found extremely funny because Raves already exists. For me,
Speaker 1: I'm this body is about fifty years old, so I
Speaker 1: remember Raves about thirty five years ago. And I always
Speaker 1: questioned myself, Yeah, the first thing I want to do
Speaker 1: is to fill myself up with drugs and put me
Speaker 1: in a place where lights are flashing violently and music
Speaker 1: is completely deafening and just does puts muncham especially when
Speaker 1: I'm most vulnerable and open to all kinds of energies
Speaker 1: and and and inputs. Does this sound logical to anyone,
Speaker 1: because to me, it doesn't does make any sense. That's
Speaker 1: why it was so many cases of kids going mad
Speaker 1: because not everyone can resist that kind of of pressure.
Speaker 1: You put drugs into yourself until you are barely aware
Speaker 1: of where you are, what you're doing, and then you
Speaker 1: put flashes of light of many colors into your eyes
Speaker 1: while he was being also stimulized by reading beats. So
Speaker 1: if this isn't reprogramming, I don't know what it is,
Speaker 1: but people like it. I'm sorry if any of you
Speaker 1: enjoyed it, but I'm just putting the science behind of it.
Speaker 1: That's what happens on a rave.
Speaker 2: No, I have thought about that. I mean, I went
Speaker 2: to that stuff a lot when I was a kid.
Speaker 2: I was still into listening to the music. I haven't
Speaker 2: gone to any of them, but I do wonder about that.
Speaker 2: I'm like, the music, the drugs, and all the effects
Speaker 2: going on. I'm like, I just do wonder what could
Speaker 2: be going on to a person's psych.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if you go to a real shaman and he
Speaker 1: asks you, so, have you been into any ceremony? Have
Speaker 1: you participated in anything taking drugs? And you ask and
Speaker 1: you reply saying, yeah, I filled myself with synthetic drugs
Speaker 1: and then smoke some natural ones and probably sniffs, and
Speaker 1: then I go to a place where music sounds loud
Speaker 1: in rhythmic beats and lots of light flashes into me.
Speaker 1: That that's the ceremony that I do. And the guy
Speaker 1: would say, you're completely mad. I'm lucky that you are normal,
Speaker 1: because the ceremony on this state is a process that
Speaker 1: is highly intimate. He has to be in a secure
Speaker 1: environment to be taken in order for you to experience
Speaker 1: what the drugs has to offer you. So there is
Speaker 1: a group of comedians in Portugal. One of them is
Speaker 1: already dead, and they had this sketch where one asks
Speaker 1: the we're talking about drugs and they say the good
Speaker 1: old days when we use drugs and so, and the
Speaker 1: guy said to him, yeah, but people still use drugs today, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: but today people use drugs to get drugged. And that's
Speaker 1: the difference because drug is supposed to be used as
Speaker 1: something that is ritualistic, right, So it's not something to
Speaker 1: be used in light terms. Even for those that consume
Speaker 1: regularly during their lives, they are doing it because it
Speaker 1: batters them in somehow. For instance, cannabis in largest your
Speaker 1: field of view for several degrees. For instance, it helps
Speaker 1: with your mental state, unless you take it too much,
Speaker 1: and then it doesn't help at all. But you take
Speaker 1: mushrooms to get some kind of natural connection, or you
Speaker 1: take ayahuasca to solve some inner problems. For instance, aauaska
Speaker 1: is recognized to cure alcohol. That to me is the
Speaker 1: worst of all drugs, is alcohol, because it's legal so
Speaker 1: and people can consume it, enact whatever they want. You
Speaker 1: can go and drive, they can go and get a gun.
Speaker 1: Because as the Greek said in vino veritas, and when
Speaker 1: you drink wine, whatever you are inside comes out. And
Speaker 1: not all people have good things inside. And I kind
Speaker 1: of lost my trail thought here. But in terms of alcohol,
Speaker 1: you can go to one a guy that is surely
Speaker 1: seriously addicted to alcohol that's very hard to quit. Normally,
Speaker 1: one session of yauaska is enough. He wondn't touch alcohol
Speaker 1: anymore in his life with one session. Of course, there
Speaker 1: are now shamans that start already saying, oh, you need
Speaker 1: probably two to three sessions because it's money, right, But
Speaker 1: I remember twenty years ago when they start doing these things,
Speaker 1: one session is more than enough. The guy wonn't take
Speaker 1: any kind any kind of addition that you had. You
Speaker 1: had one session in that set. I don't want to
Speaker 1: touch that stuff anymore, so that's a good use for
Speaker 1: And calling it a drug, well, you have to call
Speaker 1: drug everything. Sugar is a drug, coffee is a drug.
Speaker 1: So it all depends off connotation. But suddenly we decided
Speaker 1: that some drugs are bad and others are evil, and
Speaker 1: that humans can decide for themselves what they should take
Speaker 1: or how to manage their life. If you want to
Speaker 1: fool yourself with heroin, go ahead. It's your money, it's
Speaker 1: your life, it's your body. As long as you don't
Speaker 1: hurt anyone, just take take the kick and enjoy yourself.
Speaker 1: But if you start using that to harm society, then
Speaker 1: you have to do something obviously, But that's all part
Speaker 1: of the system, I think.
Speaker 2: Also, uh, all right, yeah, I think we'll wrap it
Speaker 2: up here now. Yeah yeah, Headless real quick. Let everybody
Speaker 2: know what you deal is where they can find your stuff.
Speaker 4: I'm the Headless Giant. You can find me on YouTube
Speaker 4: and x and you can also send me any sort
Speaker 4: of paranormal or strange email experiences you've had to Headless
Speaker 4: Chat podcast at gmail dot com.
Speaker 2: Awesome, thank you, thank you very much, sir. And eating Indigo,
Speaker 2: I mean.
Speaker 6: Peace you guys. That was awesome.
Speaker 3: Ricardo, thank you so much for sharing all that and
Speaker 3: done on all the usual social media and so forth,
Speaker 3: writing and sharing, sharing stuff. So appreciate putting this together
Speaker 3: at Listenick.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining and Ricardo. Please let everybody know
Speaker 2: again where they can find your stuff.
Speaker 1: Okay, so they can find me at the X at
Speaker 1: Ricardo Calvary One. They can find me as History Meets
Speaker 1: and Legends on YouTube, and they can find my other
Speaker 1: working video at the Institute for Natural Philosophy, both on
Speaker 1: x and on YouTube too. I also have two books
Speaker 1: that you can find in my pin post in in
Speaker 1: my ex and please go and check. The Fire's magazine
Speaker 1: is free to all. You can watch it downloaded. You
Speaker 1: have two issues already to see. Thank you for having me,
Speaker 1: and thank you all for the patients to indulge me.
Speaker 2: Of course, of course, yes, and thank you very much
Speaker 2: coming on and I really really do appreciate it, and
Speaker 2: I will in colude all those links in the bottom.
Speaker 2: Uh yeah. That is the end of another cult Rejects
Speaker 2: and until the next one, everybody be well later.