Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis, and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
Speaker 1: give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. See it's exactly
Speaker 1: what I've been saying right since well over a year ago,
Speaker 1: which is A, we needed Trump to win, and B
Speaker 1: we needed the left to expose itself in the meantime
Speaker 1: so that America would turn and hopefully turn for a
Speaker 1: good long time because Trump will not always be with us,
Speaker 1: The left hopefully won't always be with us in this form,
Speaker 1: but people had to see the truth about the left,
Speaker 1: and we have been blessed on both counts. Right obviously
Speaker 1: the Trump victory, but throughout this we have seen the
Speaker 1: left imploding. We've seen the left going crazy, doing psycho
Speaker 1: things and helping America see that it's not it's not
Speaker 1: your mom and dad's Democratic Party, that this is a
Speaker 1: whole different animal now, this modern left. And we get
Speaker 1: another example of it today, and that is of course
Speaker 1: Senator Padilla. And I don't know if you've seen the
Speaker 1: video yet, and obviously you don't want to look at
Speaker 1: it now while you're driving, but I hope you see
Speaker 1: it when you get home. If you haven't yet, it's
Speaker 1: very important to see that video. It's jarring, right because
Speaker 1: you see a US senator being forcibly removed from a rumor. Christinome,
Speaker 1: a sitting cabinet secretary is holding a press conference and
Speaker 1: by the way, this was not a Q and A session,
Speaker 1: And we'll get into the facts of how this thing unfolded.
Speaker 1: But it's jarring video if you haven't seen it yet
Speaker 1: because you see this sitting US senator being pushed out
Speaker 1: of the room and then placed on the floor, handcuffed, etc.
Speaker 1: But when you hear all the facts, at least the
Speaker 1: facts publicly available right now, it makes absolutely perfect sense.
Speaker 1: And I think it's another example of lefties acting badly,
Speaker 1: Lefties acting like they're above the law and then playing
Speaker 1: the victim. So I think it's really good for America
Speaker 1: to see this. Three or three, one, three, eight, two,
Speaker 1: five five the number techs d an five seven, seven,
Speaker 1: three nine. Anxious to get your take on this. Since
Speaker 1: this thing when viral in a hurry, my guess is
Speaker 1: that most people listening have already had a chance to
Speaker 1: view it and really want to break it down with
Speaker 1: You have much more to talk about today as well,
Speaker 1: but we'll start with that because it is certainly I
Speaker 1: don't think there are water coolers anymore, are there? I
Speaker 1: guess you could call it that with the technology, but
Speaker 1: it is the water cooler talk today, and I think
Speaker 1: bigger lessons in there also going back to it's remarkable.
Speaker 1: I mean we've been talking about it for days, in
Speaker 1: fact years on the show. The left really does think
Speaker 1: it's above the law in two important ways. One that
Speaker 1: they don't have to follow the existing law, and two
Speaker 1: that they can prosecute conservatives for crimes they have not committed,
Speaker 1: you know, So that the left really believes deeply in
Speaker 1: this two tier system of justice. And I think today's
Speaker 1: another example of that. I mean, my goodness, you have
Speaker 1: a sitting Cabinet secretary and she is addressing the press,
Speaker 1: she's not doing a Q and A. And then you
Speaker 1: have this individual who, from all the facts I've seen
Speaker 1: reported so far, does not announce himself as a US
Speaker 1: senator until later in the encounter. He's barging up toward her,
Speaker 1: he's speaking loudly, he's yelling things at her, and what's
Speaker 1: security supposed to do on multiple levels? So then they
Speaker 1: start pushing him back, and this is critical, then he
Speaker 1: pushes back against them, trying to get back at her.
Speaker 1: So first the first part of this, and I do
Speaker 1: think it's important to break it into sections. The first
Speaker 1: part of this, you know, barging in to a cabinet
Speaker 1: secretary who's addressing the press and moving toward her rapidly
Speaker 1: yelling things, Yeah, security should step in at that point,
Speaker 1: I don't care who you are, but he didn't. I'd
Speaker 1: say he's a US senator from everything we've seen so far.
Speaker 1: Then when security's pushing him back, he does say I'm
Speaker 1: Senator Padilla. You'll hear this sound. But at that point
Speaker 1: he's resisting law enforcement. He's a resisting security. He's pushing
Speaker 1: back against them. So at that point of resistance, first
Speaker 1: of all, even when he does say I'm a senator,
Speaker 1: you're supposed to just automatically believe that, because if i'm
Speaker 1: law enforcement or security in that situation, based upon the
Speaker 1: behavior of the individual, I'm not just believing on his
Speaker 1: word that he's a senator. And then even if he is,
Speaker 1: should that make a difference. I thought the law applied
Speaker 1: to all of us equally three or three someone three
Speaker 1: eight two five five the number. Obviously the left doesn't
Speaker 1: believe that text DN five seven seven three nights. So
Speaker 1: we got that going for us. We'll play all that
Speaker 1: fun sound, get your take, and then much more ahead
Speaker 1: in the show, like the stuff we had planned on
Speaker 1: talking about. There's obviously a lot of a lot of talk,
Speaker 1: including by the President himself right now, that suggests there
Speaker 1: may soon be a military strike in Iran, most likely
Speaker 1: that carried out by Israel, though Israel isn't going to
Speaker 1: do it without at least, I believe, without at least
Speaker 1: some tacit approval and assistance from the US, even if it's,
Speaker 1: you know, something the US would then later deny. But
Speaker 1: is there a strike do you believe about to happen?
Speaker 1: And if there is, do you think that's a good thing?
Speaker 1: Or is this peace through strength? And Trump has been
Speaker 1: a master of peace through strength, and it's been very
Speaker 1: clear lately that the Iranian government has very publicly given
Speaker 1: Trump the double middle finger on his peace overtures. So
Speaker 1: what do you think is brewing there? What do you
Speaker 1: think should happen? Three or three someone three A two
Speaker 1: five five. The number takes d An five seven, seven,
Speaker 1: three nine. How you doing, my friend, you've been. I'm
Speaker 1: sure you've been following. Ryan does a great show in
Speaker 1: the Denver market, six point thirty kitch w two to
Speaker 1: four each day. I'm sure, even all this Padia stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I spoke with Steven L.
Speaker 3: Miller as the host of the Versus Media podcast Big
Speaker 3: National Presence on ex at Red Stee's and based here
Speaker 3: in Colorado, just about the media kind of going hand
Speaker 3: in glove helping promote this narrative.
Speaker 2: Of course MSNBC among the.
Speaker 3: Usual suspects there, and had a conversation with Congressman Jeff Hurd,
Speaker 3: third congressionalist. He was recently on with you as well,
Speaker 3: But just talking about the grand standing, the theatrical nature
Speaker 3: of this Padia stunt.
Speaker 2: It reeks of desperation. Dan.
Speaker 3: They're looking to change the narrative somehow, and this is
Speaker 3: their way to do it, and I just don't think
Speaker 3: it's going to be very effective with the American people,
Speaker 3: and not even those who are in Colorado who largely
Speaker 3: support the mass deportations that the Trump administration is embarking upon.
Speaker 1: Yeah, listen, and you know it may be a brilliant
Speaker 1: thing for Senator Padia with the hardcore lefties and the
Speaker 1: big money people on the left. Yeah, you ain't knocked
Speaker 1: yourself out, right, because we don't care about that. What
Speaker 1: we care about is who wins elections. Now in California,
Speaker 1: the Democrats are going to win. But nationally, no, nationally,
Speaker 1: I think this kind of stuff, and the generous word
Speaker 1: is is theatrics. But I think this kind of behavior
Speaker 1: is this kind of I'm above the law type of
Speaker 1: behavior I don't think sets well with the American people
Speaker 1: at all, and with those critical people in the middle
Speaker 1: who often swing elections one way or the other. So please, hey,
Speaker 1: knock yourself out, get all that extra money from the
Speaker 1: hardcore left you want, But I think it's hurting you
Speaker 1: with the people who are going to decide swing state
Speaker 1: elections and close presidential elections. When you look at this
Speaker 1: Padia thing, and let me get to a little bit
Speaker 1: of sound on that, I think clearly it was intended
Speaker 1: to turn out the way that it did. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that he envisioned being on the ground being handcuffed,
Speaker 1: but he went in there to create a disturbance. He
Speaker 1: went in there to make a scene political theater, again
Speaker 1: a generous term. But he went in there to obstruct
Speaker 1: this event. He went in there to gather attention for
Speaker 1: himself by doing that. I don't think there's any question
Speaker 1: about it. But but as someone said, hey, he was
Speaker 1: acting like a threat, so he was treated like a threat.
Speaker 1: That's what happened. Now we've had the FBI come out
Speaker 1: and say that he was not wearing his senate security pin,
Speaker 1: not having been a US senator. I'm not exactly sure
Speaker 1: what that is, but whatever it is, he was not
Speaker 1: wearing it, so he wouldn't have been identified with that
Speaker 1: kind of credential. Do you think that that's exactly what
Speaker 1: I was just going to say? It would have to be, right. Okay,
Speaker 1: So you're a US senator. You know you've got a
Speaker 1: sitting cabinet secretary, and you know this is against a
Speaker 1: backdrop of two assassination attempts on the cabinet secretary's boss,
Speaker 1: and so you're going to some people call it charge
Speaker 1: at her, give him the benefit of the doubt. You're
Speaker 1: going to move very quickly toward her, yelling in a room,
Speaker 1: and you decide not to wear your security pin. Are
Speaker 1: you telling me he didn't even give any thought to Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm about to do all this shit. I wear my
Speaker 1: security pin. Of course he had to think about that.
Speaker 1: Three someone three eight two five five the number text
Speaker 1: d A N five seven seven three nine. You're on
Speaker 1: the Dan Kapler Show.
Speaker 2: And now back to the Dan Kapla Show podcast.
Speaker 4: Mister President, I just saw something that sickened my stomach,
Speaker 4: the man handling of the United States senator.
Speaker 1: We need immediate.
Speaker 4: Answers to what the hell went on?
Speaker 2: I yield the floor.
Speaker 1: Yeah, insurrection, Chuck, he's the guy should be talking about
Speaker 1: this right.
Speaker 2: Listen to it.
Speaker 1: You want to hear a true insurrection, Chuck Schumer.
Speaker 4: I want to tell you, gor Zatz.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you, Kavanaugh.
Speaker 5: You have released the whirlwind and you.
Speaker 6: Will pay the price.
Speaker 4: You won't know what hit you if you go forward
Speaker 4: with these awful decisions.
Speaker 1: Okay, So threatening violence against US Supreme Court justices by
Speaker 1: name if they don't rule the way that the Democratic
Speaker 1: Senate leader wants. Yeah, that's text book insurrection. That's a crime.
Speaker 1: He should have been prosecuted. So, of course above the law.
Speaker 1: Shumer is going to be deeply offended that a US
Speaker 1: senator is held to the same legal standard as anybody else. Right,
Speaker 1: So I'd love to hear him explain why Senator Padilla
Speaker 1: from California should be treated differently than anybody else who
Speaker 1: decides to move very quickly at a sitting cabinet member
Speaker 1: who's speaking to the press, and while he's moving very
Speaker 1: quickly toward that cabinet member is shouting things and yeah,
Speaker 1: so why should he be treated any differently? And under
Speaker 1: these circumstances where he's not even saying he's a US senator,
Speaker 1: I don't think it should matter if he's a US senator.
Speaker 1: US senator should be held to the same standard as
Speaker 1: everybody else. But as we were talking about, according to
Speaker 1: the FBI, he wasn't wearing his Senate security pin and
Speaker 1: that must have been a conscious decision, right wow. But
Speaker 1: they truly believe, I mean, just watch him operate. Most
Speaker 1: of them truly believe they should not have to follow
Speaker 1: the same laws that you and I do. Three all
Speaker 1: three seven, one three eight two five five the number
Speaker 1: text d an five seven seven three nine, And I
Speaker 1: do want to get to the sound, but I want
Speaker 1: to throw something else in the mix. And it's not
Speaker 1: just an And I told you so. But we're talking
Speaker 1: yesterday about hey, you know a good text, I think
Speaker 1: alexis Senate talking about how DPD had done such a
Speaker 1: tremendous job with the anti ice protesters, kept them off
Speaker 1: the highway, et cetera. And my response was, of course
Speaker 1: they did, because anytime DPD is allowed to do their job,
Speaker 1: they do it very well. But so often now because
Speaker 1: it's politically controlled, they're not allowed to enforce the law
Speaker 1: because that's just a code of the left right. They
Speaker 1: don't enforce the law against the left. So my theory
Speaker 1: on air yesterday was that Mayor Johnston had finally authorized
Speaker 1: DPD to do what it does best and enforced the
Speaker 1: law because Johnston did the political calculation and determined it
Speaker 1: would be bad for him politically to let the left
Speaker 1: now and wild in the streets. Why because Trump has
Speaker 1: shown he will step in and he has a right
Speaker 1: to and he will win. And so I think that
Speaker 1: was the political calculation, and I think Johnston kind of
Speaker 1: confirmed that here in this part of the interview with
Speaker 1: nine News.
Speaker 7: What goes through your mind when you see those confrontations,
Speaker 7: do you say, is the president watching this? What will
Speaker 7: he do if he sees these videos.
Speaker 8: Yeah, I'm frustrated and I'm angry when I see that,
Speaker 8: because I think it sends the wrong message about where
Speaker 8: Denver is and what Denver believes.
Speaker 5: There's no reason to invite a new.
Speaker 8: Battle with the president that he would love to start
Speaker 8: in a city that doesn't have a crisis.
Speaker 7: Are you handling these protests differently this time around, knowing
Speaker 7: that if they get out of hand, the president could
Speaker 7: send in federal forces.
Speaker 9: Yeah.
Speaker 5: My concern is not really about the president. My concern
Speaker 5: is about people in Denver feeling safe. But I think
Speaker 5: the people that miscarry this mission.
Speaker 1: Why can't he just be honest, right? I mean, he's
Speaker 1: a smart guy, he's got talent. If he just decided,
Speaker 1: you know what, I'm going to meet Mike Johnston, who's
Speaker 1: known for being brutally honest and I'm just going to
Speaker 1: tell the truth, he'd have a lot brighter political future
Speaker 1: than he does now. And he used to be a
Speaker 1: straight shooter. We disagreed on plenty. He'd come on air
Speaker 1: all the time, we had a great time. He was
Speaker 1: a straight shooter, smart guy. And then somewhere along the road,
Speaker 1: my theory, he just decided that no, he was going
Speaker 1: to do it the way the left does it. Truth
Speaker 1: doesn't matter like there, obviously, I mean he kind of
Speaker 1: admitted it in the first Q and A and obviously, no, No,
Speaker 1: the reason that he let Denver PD do their job
Speaker 1: in this case where he normally stops them from doing
Speaker 1: their job, i e. Area campus takeover is because, yeah,
Speaker 1: it would give Trump the opportunity to come in and
Speaker 1: properly federalize National Guard in Colorado to control the streets.
Speaker 1: And Johnston didn't want that politically, why can't he just
Speaker 1: admit it.
Speaker 5: Into violence that's just not tolerated here?
Speaker 8: And I don't think I think the people who care
Speaker 8: the most about this issue would say that doesn't help them.
Speaker 8: If people are violent and they're damaging someone's small business,
Speaker 8: we're going to rescue, you know. If you are assaulting officer,
Speaker 8: we're going to rest you. To kind of light cars
Speaker 8: on fire, We're going to restue.
Speaker 1: But what's he talking about? He and the rest of
Speaker 1: left tolerate violence all the time as long as the
Speaker 1: violence is being committed by their favorite and favored groups
Speaker 1: of people. I mean, look at is their whole structure
Speaker 1: is set up to protect violent actors people who are
Speaker 1: here illegally who happen to commit other violent crimes, their
Speaker 1: whole structure. They've passed all these bills to protect those
Speaker 1: people from being deported.
Speaker 2: So yeah, it's.
Speaker 10: Eighteen people were arrested Tuesday night after a group of
Speaker 10: protesters got into confrontations with police.
Speaker 1: The stakes are really high.
Speaker 10: God lost Rojas Rodriguez is with the Colorado Immigrant Rights
Speaker 10: Coalition and helped organize the protests.
Speaker 4: And yes, we had some confrontation and alteredcations with the police,
Speaker 4: but those are not the folks that we are working with,
Speaker 4: So I just want to make that very clear.
Speaker 5: Denver's police chief says.
Speaker 1: That what does that even mean. We had some altercations
Speaker 1: that the police, but those aren't the folks we're working with.
Speaker 10: Agitators in the crowd.
Speaker 8: They try to change the message and turn it into
Speaker 8: something different from what it originated.
Speaker 7: How would Denver respond if the President were to send
Speaker 7: in federal forces or the National Guard into somewhere like Denver.
Speaker 8: We think we will continue to make the case there
Speaker 8: is no need for federal intervention and we will oppose
Speaker 8: it if they try to bring it. But I do
Speaker 8: know if folks here are trying to advocate to protect
Speaker 8: lagrants in this city. The worst thing you could do
Speaker 8: for those folks is to try to attract the president
Speaker 8: and the federal national role.
Speaker 1: The way if you care about migrants, Let's say you
Speaker 1: really care about people here illegally who are not committing
Speaker 1: other crimes and they're trying to be good citizens in
Speaker 1: every other way. If you really cared about them, Mike Johnston,
Speaker 1: you'd be doing the opposite of what you're doing. You're
Speaker 1: the guy out there right now protecting the people who
Speaker 1: pray on them, who praise on them. It's people here
Speaker 1: illegally who commit other crimes, and you and the rest
Speaker 1: of the Democrats have devoted your professional lives to protecting
Speaker 1: the criminals who often pray on other people here illegally.
Speaker 1: It's so phony.
Speaker 5: Going to come to your city. That doesn't help any
Speaker 5: of us.
Speaker 7: Last night's protest was organized by several different groups, including
Speaker 7: the Party for Socialism and Liberation. They helped organize another
Speaker 7: rally earlier this week outside Aurora's ice facility, and that
Speaker 7: group was also active during the twenty twenty Black Lives
Speaker 7: Matter protests. This weekend and National Day of Protests is
Speaker 7: being organized by a group called No Kings. While some
Speaker 7: of the same people, of course, might be there, these
Speaker 7: are separate groups organizing them, probably separate vibes as well.
Speaker 1: Here remarkable because that's the whole seam of the left right,
Speaker 1: is that they're kings. They're above the law. Whether it's
Speaker 1: Senator pad Today barging into the Christy Gnome Press address,
Speaker 1: you know, whether it's it's Shumer standing in front of
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court and threatening justices with violence by name,
Speaker 1: you know, whether it's pick them, Polish Johnston, the rest
Speaker 1: of them defying federal immigration law. Who walks around acting
Speaker 1: like kings. But the good news is people see it.
Speaker 1: So that's why I started the show the way I
Speaker 1: did today, which is, yeah, this is great. People are
Speaker 1: getting to see who the left really is. And that
Speaker 1: may be great for these lefties in their base, but
Speaker 1: that's not enough to win, and they're turning off an
Speaker 1: awful lot of other people. Three at three seOne three eight,
Speaker 1: two five five takes d A N five seven seven
Speaker 1: three nine. So we'll get you the hot take sound
Speaker 1: on all that stuff. But I also want to work
Speaker 1: into the mix. You know, these obvious can't even call
Speaker 1: them rumblings, These maneuvers right now surrounding the potential for
Speaker 1: a military strike on Aron's nuclear weapons. Nobody I think
Speaker 1: is suggesting at this point would be a US strike.
Speaker 1: But is there going to be an Israeli strike? So
Speaker 1: I want to come back bringing some sound from President
Speaker 1: Trump on that. And do you think it should happen?
Speaker 1: Do you think that should happen? If so, how should
Speaker 1: it happen? How do you think it'd be a terrible
Speaker 1: thing to have that happen right now? What do you
Speaker 1: think the downsides are? I think this is where we're
Speaker 1: talking about it, since at the very least a concerted
Speaker 1: effort has been made by President Trump and others to
Speaker 1: signal that there may be a strike soon. Now, is
Speaker 1: that part of piece through strength? Could very well be.
Speaker 1: Trump's been great at that, But what if there is
Speaker 1: a strike coming? Where do you come down on that?
Speaker 1: Three or three? Someone three eight two five five the
Speaker 1: number text d A N five seven seven three nine.
Speaker 1: You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 9: Senator Padilla, I was almost immediately removed from the room.
Speaker 9: I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed.
Speaker 9: I was not arrested. I was not detained. I will
Speaker 9: say this, Well.
Speaker 1: Let's start with that. What reason would he have to
Speaker 1: believe that he should not have been forcibly removed from
Speaker 1: the room. You have a sitting cabinet secretary who's addressing
Speaker 1: the press and he barges in, yelling at her, moving
Speaker 1: toward her. What reason would he have to believe he
Speaker 1: should not be stopped from doing that and removed from
Speaker 1: the room. And then he wasn't willing to go voluntarily.
Speaker 1: He was pushing back, which is why he was then
Speaker 1: pushed out. So I'd love to hear him explain why
Speaker 1: he thinks he should have just been allowed to do
Speaker 1: what he was doing. And then when he talks about
Speaker 1: and if you haven't seen it already, well when you
Speaker 1: get home the video of him then on the floor
Speaker 1: being handcuffed, et cetera, when he talks about, hey, but
Speaker 1: they didn't arrest or detain me, they give him a break.
Speaker 1: I mean, first of all, I think the US senator
Speaker 1: should be treated like everybody else, and if you or
Speaker 1: I did that, we would end up being arrested. But
Speaker 1: now he's he's trying to say that that they've admitted
Speaker 1: he was wrongfully detained because they didn't arrest him. No,
Speaker 1: he got a break when they realized he was a
Speaker 1: US senator. I don't think he should get any breaks,
Speaker 1: be treated just like everybody else. Three all three someone
Speaker 1: three eight two five five the number text d An
Speaker 1: five seven seven three nine back to Dan.
Speaker 3: Yes, the left and the media within it, they continue
Speaker 3: to illustrate this separation that they believe there are certain
Speaker 3: people who are on high that are above everybody else,
Speaker 3: and the US Senator should be considered one of those people.
Speaker 3: And that's in one of the MSNBC clips that I
Speaker 3: have for you. But then also Senator set it himself.
Speaker 3: He goes, if they are going to do this to
Speaker 3: a sitting US senator, yeah, like me, then think what
Speaker 3: they'll do to the line cooks and the farm laborers
Speaker 3: and the work. It's this inherent condescension to the very
Speaker 3: people they pretend to represent.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and I love it. I don't love the behavior,
Speaker 1: but I love the fact they're doing it publicly so
Speaker 1: people can see who they really are. And that is
Speaker 1: a great thing. And listen, I'm sure there's some example
Speaker 1: out there on the right, but show it to me.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, this first of all, this use
Speaker 1: of violence as a political tool, that that is a
Speaker 1: day in, day out thing for the left right. It's
Speaker 1: a key part of their playbook because they can't win
Speaker 1: on merit, logic, reason, fact, morality, you know, So they've
Speaker 1: got this playbook politics of personal destruction, violence, et cetera.
Speaker 1: And so that this superiority is a fascinating thing to me,
Speaker 1: this elitism. But you see it play out in so
Speaker 1: many different ways, and I'd love to get into the
Speaker 1: philosophical part of that. Here's this least so Rubin from MSNBC.
Speaker 1: They just can't believe this.
Speaker 11: It appears that he was arrested outside the room. Christina,
Speaker 11: I am now in possession of video that was taken
Speaker 11: from a different angle of this same incident. The video
Speaker 11: you showed earlier shows Senator Padia being escorted out of
Speaker 11: the room and quickly ends thereafter. The video that I
Speaker 11: have seen shows that what happens when he goes into
Speaker 11: that hallway, he is further pushed into the hallway by
Speaker 11: somebody wearing an FBI shirt. He is then pushed onto
Speaker 11: the ground and placed under arrest with his hands behind
Speaker 11: his back as he is faced down on the floor
Speaker 11: by three additional officers. Obviously, we don't have full information
Speaker 11: about the altercation that led him to be pushed out
Speaker 11: of the room by personnel either from the Department of
Speaker 11: Homeland Security or the FBI. But this is yet another
Speaker 11: escalation between the Department of Homeland Security and those agents
Speaker 11: working at their disposal and lawmakers.
Speaker 1: No, it's an escalation by lawmakers. I didn't hear her.
Speaker 1: I haven't heard anybody explain what right reason he would
Speaker 1: have to believe he should have been treated differently. And
Speaker 1: the lack of an arrest. Again, he obviously was given
Speaker 1: a break in the end on that, and that's too
Speaker 1: bad because he needs to be treated just like everybody else.
Speaker 5: Obviously.
Speaker 11: LAMANAA. Macgiver, a congressman from New Jersey, has now been
Speaker 11: indicted on three federal charges, for which she could face
Speaker 11: up to eighteen years in prison, in an altercation that
Speaker 11: started not dissimilarly from this, you know, one of the
Speaker 11: things I was looking.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but what's the explanation for why she should not
Speaker 1: have been indicted? You're getting physical with an ice agent
Speaker 1: while he or she performs her duties. Why shouldn't she
Speaker 1: have been indicted? It obviously just comes back to this
Speaker 1: belief of the left that they're above the law, and
Speaker 1: they show it in so many different ways. Let me
Speaker 1: get to there's some interesting sound on this, but first
Speaker 1: I've got to get back to Schumer because this is
Speaker 1: so beautiful.
Speaker 4: Mister President, I just saw something that sickened my stomach,
Speaker 4: the manhandling of the United States Senator.
Speaker 1: We need immediate.
Speaker 4: Answers to what the hell went on?
Speaker 2: I yield the floor.
Speaker 1: Oh I love hearing him say that, right, because how
Speaker 1: do you think the typical Americans can respond to that?
Speaker 1: And it's so fun, you know, while they're also launching
Speaker 1: this no Kings thing. I've got to tell you they
Speaker 1: they got to fire that consultant, right, whoever came up
Speaker 1: with this no Kings thing as theirs their theme. It
Speaker 1: is already not aging well for them, given the way
Speaker 1: that they behave and this just another example of that.
Speaker 1: Speaking of which Tim Walls. Tim Walls in there on
Speaker 1: the ail today, right, comparing Ice agents to the Gestapo, you.
Speaker 12: Said earlier that the ICE agents under the orders of
Speaker 12: President Trump are a modern day Gestapo. Do you realize
Speaker 12: how discussing a phrase that is considering the history of
Speaker 12: Nazi Germany.
Speaker 2: Would you like to recant that statement what I.
Speaker 13: Said, Congressman, and I have a long history of sporting
Speaker 13: law enforcement.
Speaker 2: I said President.
Speaker 13: Trump was using them as his modern day Gestapo, not
Speaker 13: identifying who you are, coming up in unmarked bands, taking
Speaker 13: people away and giving it.
Speaker 12: Is it the responsibility of ICE to actually deport illegal
Speaker 12: aliens in the United States who are here?
Speaker 2: Isn't that their responsibility?
Speaker 13: Yes, it is, Congressman, except that the Constitution is.
Speaker 1: Not an inconvenience. It's not an either o.
Speaker 2: Nobody's said an your job.
Speaker 12: Do you have a responsibility to deport illegal aliens in
Speaker 12: the review process? Going through that process right now?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's the insanity thing I'm talking about Rick, the
Speaker 1: guy who was just a Democratic Democratic nominee for vice president,
Speaker 1: comparing ICE to Gestapo. I mean, yeah, they have lost
Speaker 1: their minds, and that is good for the GOP. It
Speaker 1: is good for the GOP more and more people seeing
Speaker 1: who they really are. Three or three seOne three eight
Speaker 1: two five five the number text d A N five
Speaker 1: seven seven three nine. Hey, I'm seeing some indications. We'll
Speaker 1: find out together, right, but some indications this federal court
Speaker 1: hearing out in California over the president's use of the
Speaker 1: National Guard. That there may be it's possible. I'm not
Speaker 1: predicting this, but it's possible we're soon going to get
Speaker 1: a court order that enjoins that based on some kind
Speaker 1: of technical procedural issue, a claim that Trump should have
Speaker 1: issued the order in a particular way and through Gavin Newsom.
Speaker 1: So I know we're getting into legal minutie here, but
Speaker 1: it may end up mattering, and we may see this
Speaker 1: use of the National Guard and joined out in Los
Speaker 1: Angeles until the President reissues the order in a particular way.
Speaker 2: Dan, you and I have cited standards in the past.
Speaker 3: This is far from unprecedented, and one of them happened
Speaker 3: when your dad was on duty in the nineteen sixty
Speaker 3: eight Democratic National Convention that was getting out of him.
Speaker 3: In the president of the United States at that time,
Speaker 3: Lyndon Baines Johnson has every authority under the plan power
Speaker 3: of the executive Branch, which Andy McCarthy spoke about with
Speaker 3: you earlier this week, and Andy's an expert on everything
Speaker 3: pertaining to the law. The president makes that decision without
Speaker 3: having to check in with anybody.
Speaker 2: And this is what the courts are doing.
Speaker 3: They're looking to kind of death by a thousand cuts
Speaker 3: undermine and second guests, every little policy decision that President
Speaker 3: Trump makes that's unprecedented, that has not been done to
Speaker 3: a sitting president of the United States.
Speaker 1: You know, And I think there's going to be I
Speaker 1: think the Supreme Court is going to address this shortly
Speaker 1: in a case they took up regarding birthright citizenship. But
Speaker 1: the point of the case wasn't so much to resolve
Speaker 1: the birthright citizenship issue as to resolve the issue of
Speaker 1: whether individual federal district court judges could issue national injunctions
Speaker 1: affecting parties not before the court. And so I think
Speaker 1: we're going to get something pretty important from the US
Speaker 1: Supreme Court quickly, and that if we do see a
Speaker 1: judge enjoin the president's use of the California National Guard,
Speaker 1: the nationalizing of the Guard, I expect it's going to
Speaker 1: be based on a technical procedural concern and something the
Speaker 1: President could fix pretty quickly. So we'll let you know
Speaker 1: as soon as that news comes down. Three or three
Speaker 1: someone three eight, two, five, five. We'll get to some
Speaker 1: text after the break. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 2: And now back to the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3: Podcast, if you provide an update on Iran.
Speaker 11: We're hearing reports that US personnel are being moved out
Speaker 11: of the region when it's striking business.
Speaker 13: Well, they are being moved out because it could be
Speaker 13: a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens.
Speaker 5: But they are being a we've given.
Speaker 9: Notice to move out.
Speaker 2: And we'll see what happens.
Speaker 7: Is there anything that can be done to dial That's
Speaker 7: how much you're down in the region.
Speaker 13: They can't have a nuclear weapon person, they can't have
Speaker 13: a new clue.
Speaker 2: We're not going to allow that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, So it's one of two things, right, Either a
Speaker 1: strike is coming soon, Israel striking arounds nuclear sites, or
Speaker 1: this is peace through strength and the President trying to
Speaker 1: ratchet the pressure up on Iran. No way we can
Speaker 1: know from the outside. I do have to believe this though,
Speaker 1: right if there was in fact a strike coming soon,
Speaker 1: you would think that these moves would be made quietly
Speaker 1: right now, so Israel would have more of an element
Speaker 1: of surprise. But hey, we will find out together. But
Speaker 1: do you want to get your take on whether you
Speaker 1: think a military action should be taken to knock out
Speaker 1: the Iranian nuclear sites. I'm guessing Ryan maybe I'd be wrong,
Speaker 1: but I'm guessing that if we were to ask about
Speaker 1: the US taking that action, will probably be about ninety
Speaker 1: nine to one against. But the question of whether Israel
Speaker 1: right now should because Iran's made it clear, right, not
Speaker 1: the good people of Iran, but obviously the corrupt regime
Speaker 1: has made it clear. They do intend to commit another
Speaker 1: Holocaust on an even horrifically larger scale. That is their intention,
Speaker 1: and they intend to wipe Israel off the face of
Speaker 1: the earth, and nobody should doubt them. When say that
Speaker 1: three or three someone three eight two five five takes
Speaker 1: d An five seven seven three nine want to get
Speaker 1: to some text, Dan wondering what Senator Padilla did that
Speaker 1: was unlawful. Watch the tape he wanted to ask a question.
Speaker 1: I have not seen a continuous tape start to finish.
Speaker 1: I've seen tape incremental tape of him in the room.
Speaker 1: From everything I've seen, and then the descriptions provided I'll
Speaker 1: play that sound from Secretary Gnome, et cetera. It is
Speaker 1: my understanding that Senator Padilla came in without a Senate
Speaker 1: Security pin, without identifying himself, and while he's yelling things
Speaker 1: at Gnome, he's moving very quickly toward this sitting Cabinet secretary.
Speaker 1: And at that point, as someone said, he acted like
Speaker 1: a threat, so he was treated like a threat. So
Speaker 1: then he's being pushed back out. It's only then that
Speaker 1: he says, I'm Senator Padilla. But what difference should that make?
Speaker 1: What difference should that make? Given the behavior and what
Speaker 1: did he do that was illegal? Well, first of all,
Speaker 1: I have to look at the particular statutes out there,
Speaker 1: but generally speaking, you're not allowed to barge into an event,
Speaker 1: whether it's a government, private event, whatever and disturb the
Speaker 1: peace like that. But then beyond that, when he starts resisting,
Speaker 1: and there's no question that he was resisting security at
Speaker 1: some point. Now I can't tell whether we're talking about
Speaker 1: homeland security, FBI, private security, but he was clearly resisting
Speaker 1: at one point. And then at that point I would
Speaker 1: think that would constitute a crime, and that's why he
Speaker 1: was handcuffed.
Speaker 3: Well, he set himself dan in the clips that we've
Speaker 3: already aired to our dear Texter. He was not arrested,
Speaker 3: he was not detained. He was restrained for two reasons. One,
Speaker 3: he was acting like a protester like you might see
Speaker 3: somebody shouting in a congressional hearing like the confirmation process
Speaker 3: for Brett Cavin, I remember, and they would take those
Speaker 3: protesters out.
Speaker 2: That's what he was there. He was a protester.
Speaker 3: Further that point, not wearing the Senate pin, so not
Speaker 3: acting in his authorized capacity as a senator. He has
Speaker 3: opportunities through a meeting and through hearings to address the
Speaker 3: second Harry in those settings. In this one, if he
Speaker 3: wants to pretend to be a member of the media
Speaker 3: like you or me, you and I know how to
Speaker 3: conduct ourselves at a press conference. No, you'll just start
Speaker 3: shouting things at Christin.
Speaker 1: No, he wanted this, and this is why I think
Speaker 1: it's so good. It came down this way, right. He
Speaker 1: wanted this, he wanted to go in, he wanted to
Speaker 1: disrupt this, he wanted to resist. And it is so
Speaker 1: important that America sees that no, everybody's going to be
Speaker 1: treated equally. And I think that's a very very important message.
Speaker 1: Dan says a texture, I think we should pull all
Speaker 1: the troops in California and let California burn to the ground.
Speaker 1: Apparently that's what Kevin wants. I don't want to see
Speaker 1: California burn to the ground. I think Trump has done
Speaker 1: a tremendous job stabilizing things in California. The reason we're
Speaker 1: talking about it now is from what I'm seeing, you know, texted,
Speaker 1: tweeted out of the courtroom, etc. There is a chance
Speaker 1: that a judge out there might enjoin the President's use
Speaker 1: of the National Guard at this point based upon a
Speaker 1: technical procedural step, whether the initial order was done correctly
Speaker 1: in a procedure away that Trump could then correct. Dan
Speaker 1: pidias stunt is called aji prop. Is that how you
Speaker 1: say it?
Speaker 6: Ryan?
Speaker 2: That's right, Okay, a prop?
Speaker 1: Let's see Dan, other than Fetterman, do any Dems ever
Speaker 1: depart from party lines in any material manner? I can't
Speaker 1: think of a single DEM in Colorado departing from party lines.
Speaker 1: So yeah, No, can't think anybody. If somebody has an idea,
Speaker 1: let us know, Dan, No one wants to be the
Speaker 1: next day tip the National Guard federalized. And that's what
Speaker 1: we were talking about earlier. And I'll play that sound
Speaker 1: again when we have a little more time in the
Speaker 1: next segment. But really good Channel nine interview with Mayor Johnston,
Speaker 1: where he seems to at first admit that the reason
Speaker 1: he allowed police to do what police do so well
Speaker 1: when he allows them to enforce the law against these
Speaker 1: anti ice protesters, is that he didn't want Trump stepping in,
Speaker 1: but then he tried to deny that. In any case,
Speaker 1: it's obvious, right, It's obvious Johnston, who so often doesn't
Speaker 1: allow the police to do what they want to do,
Speaker 1: force the law does in this case because Trump has
Speaker 1: made it clear he will step in. And it's clear
Speaker 1: to Johnston Trump would step in, he would do so legally,
Speaker 1: and he would win. So I think that's why Mike
Speaker 1: Johnston allowed the police to enforce the law against these protesters.
Speaker 1: Will play that sound coming up early in the five.
Speaker 1: Colonel kirk Dale from Parker, Colorado. Colonel, how you doing,
Speaker 1: my friend?
Speaker 6: I'm doing well? Sor I have you called in a while?
Speaker 1: Now?
Speaker 6: You missed jo Button. I'll make my quick statements. I
Speaker 6: wanted to comment about the possible stripe by Israel if
Speaker 6: you you men out recalled. But on the day that
Speaker 6: they struck Gaza, Gauza took place and they have packed Israel.
Speaker 6: You asked me what I thought should happen. In response
Speaker 6: to that, I said, attack Israel, attack Iran, right and
Speaker 6: no reason to change my opinion at this point in time,
Speaker 6: and I'll just leave it at that.
Speaker 1: Well, and Colonel, and for those new to the show,
Speaker 1: Colonel Kurt is a true American hero who has risked
Speaker 1: his life many times for this nation in combat. But Colonel,
Speaker 1: your point at the time following October seven is that
Speaker 1: the straight out of hell attacks of October seven were
Speaker 1: in fact Iran attacking Israel. And I think that's a
Speaker 1: very correct way to look at a colonel. The music
Speaker 1: means I have to go, I'm so glad to hear
Speaker 1: your voice again. I hope you call us every single day.
Speaker 1: Three three someone three eight, two five five. That's in
Speaker 1: the mix again. We'll play some sound from President Trump
Speaker 1: who says, yeah, we're removing Americans from that region because
Speaker 1: there might be a strike on Iran, should there be.
Speaker 1: You're on the Dead Captain Show.