Speaker 1: Now we're good. Oh the things that I could do
Speaker 1: if this show ever got the level of sponsorship or
Speaker 1: support that it is by this time most certainly should have.
Speaker 1: All right, let's see what we got going on here.
Speaker 1: A couple of things we gotta to go over too,
Speaker 1: and uh it'll be fun, I guess. Yeah. All right, man,
Speaker 1: that squeak thing that ever happened before. Ah, let's see.
Speaker 1: There's a lot up here, but I gotta find the
Speaker 1: right one. Oh it was here, you said, have a pitch, said,
Speaker 1: I want to scroll over the top it and see it.
Speaker 1: All right, so let's start with you. But I want
Speaker 1: to first maybe go this way and show this is
Speaker 1: salvation data attack. Why is this awareed here like that?
Speaker 1: Contact us? Wow? I didn't have that. What this place is? Creepy? Man?
Speaker 1: All right, hey, let me see my face. Celebrate sold
Speaker 1: phone hacking tech to repressive regimes. You know what that means.
Speaker 1: That means the side of the fight that our country
Speaker 1: where the banks decided to give a bunch of money
Speaker 1: and weapons to to go kill other tribes clear the
Speaker 1: land Congo style in various parts of the world that
Speaker 1: had resources that would promise to them if they were
Speaker 1: you know given certain things, and they weren't promised that
Speaker 1: they'd take it anyway. And the Sudan has Jewish hands
Speaker 1: all over it too, by the way, Jewish banking hands,
Speaker 1: and they're mass murdering of all kinds of people, and
Speaker 1: be like, oh, they're probably who care as well? You
Speaker 1: should care because this is their method, and that this
Speaker 1: is an explanation as too, and a display and an
Speaker 1: example of what's come in here. If you don't believe
Speaker 1: that you're crazy, it's already happened here before. Yeah, it
Speaker 1: was called the Civil War. They actually allowed you to
Speaker 1: be armed on both sides. That won't happen again this time.
Speaker 1: They might let us kill each other for a little while,
Speaker 1: but what's going to come in afterward is the whole
Speaker 1: anti Semitism bullshit, and people would just be strong up
Speaker 1: like the period, you know, seventy five thousand, they said,
Speaker 1: and then that was a fake. What about the time
Speaker 1: when we were going over the details stating that they
Speaker 1: at one time and I think it was one thousand
Speaker 1: and eighty something somewhere around then, the oive cult of Saturn,
Speaker 1: the Jews bought for very little ninety thousand prisoners of
Speaker 1: war just to slaughter them in disgusting ways. This is
Speaker 1: these people. It wasn't Zionism, it wasn't Frankism, it wasn't
Speaker 1: uh whatever, it's Judaism. It's them. Get around that. Try
Speaker 1: try bullshitting your way through that. If they're if they're religious,
Speaker 1: and I don't care about the whole atheism aspect or
Speaker 1: Satanism aspect or whatever, that is not a what do
Speaker 1: you call it? A disclusion. They still are of this mindset.
Speaker 1: They still want the same end result, and they're still
Speaker 1: going to operate and work for that goal. You can
Speaker 1: tell me that X Y Z person Ellison think whatever,
Speaker 1: or oh those people are you know, they're not into
Speaker 1: this thing. They're just they're atheists, like who fucking okay, well,
Speaker 1: who cares? Who cares what they call themselves or consider themselves.
Speaker 1: They're committing the crimes and they're and they're working directly
Speaker 1: on behalf of this demonic cult that is headed by
Speaker 1: people like the Rothschild family. And I don't want to
Speaker 1: If you try to argue that you're not, you're not
Speaker 1: thinking clearly. There's a Salvation Data tech leading provider of
Speaker 1: digital forensic solutions. Salvation Data provides one stops digital forensic
Speaker 1: solutions from single digital forensic tools like phone forensics. Oh
Speaker 1: that's nice, video forensics, database forensics, and data recovery to
Speaker 1: integrated digital forensics lab DATTA recover means if you tried
Speaker 1: to delete it, they'll get it and they'll still hold
Speaker 1: you accountable. Oh look at how friendly this little war
Speaker 1: room is. I'm kind pretty nine thousand customers, one hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty countries, twenty product solutions. Abu Dhabi Police do
Speaker 1: you buy police? Oh? Boy, saw Paulo, Brazil. That's not
Speaker 1: a place I want to go anywhere. I think we
Speaker 1: may have. Well, someone of us here has family there. Guitar.
Speaker 1: That's surprising because there are a bunch of juices the
Speaker 1: guitar too. Oh yeah, long weird history in Qatar. I
Speaker 1: don't care if you want to call it cotter. It's
Speaker 1: I call it quitar. And that's one way I'm going
Speaker 1: to fucking pronounce it. That's how you pronounce words. Catter. No,
Speaker 1: there's a there's a space, there's there's a stop between
Speaker 1: fucking syllables. It's Qatar. Ministry of Economy and Finance Italy.
Speaker 1: Oh that's great, scratch that off the list, said or
Speaker 1: maybe we just blow the fucking hell out of all
Speaker 1: these people and take our fucking land back. What do
Speaker 1: you think should we do that? Instead? Now, let me
Speaker 1: go ahead and just address a few things. Where the
Speaker 1: hell was I there is no where's the one that was?
Speaker 1: Just here? There you go. Good afternoon, everybody. Yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: I don't know how long I'm going to be here today.
Speaker 1: I first of all, I'm mad at myself for being
Speaker 1: on the wrong side. I don't know if you can
Speaker 1: hear the stupid airplanes so sidy, but it's pissed me off.
Speaker 1: I can't sleep, that's my problem. So life gets all
Speaker 1: fucked up on a different schedule. So I hear at
Speaker 1: one o'clock now instead of nine because I couldn't the
Speaker 1: whole time. I went better at ten thirty, got up
Speaker 1: at well, at one point, I was up at four a.
Speaker 1: I'm doing freaking squats with a forty five pounds waiting
Speaker 1: my wrapped around my chest because I couldn't freaking sleep.
Speaker 1: So today I am fasting. I'm gonna tire myself out
Speaker 1: by fucking starving myself. I'm not gonna eat and get
Speaker 1: until Friday. So anyway, one way or the other if
Speaker 1: this should get sponsors to get support, that I should
Speaker 1: have more people jump on the patriot over here, and
Speaker 1: that means I can put up more, even more content
Speaker 1: that's exclusive because more people will see it'll make more sense,
Speaker 1: it won't people waste a fucking time. That'd be great.
Speaker 1: Apparently zero is is a is a rational number. That's
Speaker 1: that's fucking ridiculous. I hate Spotify and what it does.
Speaker 1: It's worse than freaking YouTube when it comes to suppression,
Speaker 1: and YouTube is a piece of shit. So there's that. Anyway,
Speaker 1: support the show. The best way to do it is
Speaker 1: support yourself. And that's how you do it.
Speaker 2: Right here.
Speaker 1: You go to my website right here, click it, and
Speaker 1: many people, like everybody, should be doing this. This is
Speaker 1: I want to introduce you to your new doctor. His
Speaker 1: name is doctor Peter Glinton. People save your life and
Speaker 1: you and you a shit ton of money. Highlight that,
Speaker 1: right click copy, go into the site, scroll down. You're
Speaker 1: gonna spend ten dollars less over here and one hundred
Speaker 1: dollars less over here by using my code, and it's
Speaker 1: gonna be worth every goddamn penny and you'll feel like
Speaker 1: you're robbing him by the time you're done looking through
Speaker 1: this site because you kind of are. It's volume, right,
Speaker 1: not trying to make everybody, not trying to get rich
Speaker 1: off of one person. That's not cool, all right, So
Speaker 1: health recovery protocols, all this stuff, all these things at
Speaker 1: your disposal any time you have one of these things,
Speaker 1: these issues. There's also a seven day detox program, twenty
Speaker 1: one day beat protocol in a sixty seven day heavy
Speaker 1: metal detox program. And then all these issues they can
Speaker 1: do and get members again. Go to live q and
Speaker 1: as every Tuesday and Thursday, you get two extra opportunities
Speaker 1: between our Wednesday sandwich, between our Wednesday or our Wednesday
Speaker 1: semis between that we have him here at eleven am
Speaker 1: my time on Wednesdays. Well it's twelve p m my
Speaker 1: time now because we don't change everybody else does. But
Speaker 1: h yeah, these are all these numbers here, these times,
Speaker 1: those are in central. So just make sure you realize
Speaker 1: that that's his schedule. Obviously, there today is this twenty
Speaker 1: seven of this Thanksgiving, so you shouldn't expect there be
Speaker 1: a one there. And then you scroll dot far enough
Speaker 1: you see that there's a chat here, there's his life calling,
Speaker 1: and you can ask questions directly to him. Then become
Speaker 1: a member. Use my code. Click on here to do that.
Speaker 1: Go to my site. Click this. Okay, if you have
Speaker 1: Honey installed in your computer, go up to this thing.
Speaker 1: You should see a little orange h here. Right click this.
Speaker 1: I think it's very click. Maybe it's not. No, but
Speaker 1: whatever it is, get Honey the hell off of your computer.
Speaker 1: It's not saving anything. It's actually it's not giving me
Speaker 1: the best deal. It's pretending like it's couring. If it's
Speaker 1: not affiliated with something that has a coupon code or something,
Speaker 1: it's not giving it to you because it's trying to
Speaker 1: steal add revenue from people, so don't do that. It's
Speaker 1: trying to steal affiliate revenue from people, so don't use it.
Speaker 1: Go over here. This is the Azure will. These are
Speaker 1: the two things you should do to make yourself a
Speaker 1: better healthy person. I have the hopefully multivitament on the
Speaker 1: way fully chemic acid blend right here. That should be
Speaker 1: a ninety day supply or all to six months, depending
Speaker 1: on what samples, what size are taking of a scoop.
Speaker 1: And then you scroll down there is the core oper
Speaker 1: rate there. Get that click this scroll down and you'll
Speaker 1: find the second time you'll see IP six Supreme. There's
Speaker 1: a Kyle Siam Magnesium. Get those and I'll let you know.
Speaker 1: When I launched my own tourine, it might be mixed
Speaker 1: with something else. I'll see see how I feel like
Speaker 1: banking that. But there you have it, and then from
Speaker 1: here you can go to the mice. You just scroll
Speaker 1: down here and get all the amazing hot sauces. I'd
Speaker 1: like to see somebody test this because I don't know
Speaker 1: what the hell has been going on the last three days.
Speaker 1: We haven't had an order and that's really weird. Makes
Speaker 1: you wonder if something's going on. What the fuck did
Speaker 1: I just have to put a coffee all the fucking table.
Speaker 1: I have nothing to clean that up with. Really, Okay,
Speaker 1: so we're gonna start with this video here. No, not
Speaker 1: that one, Yes, that one, and it's really Survidan's company
Speaker 1: is hacking phone globally. Now there is something that I
Speaker 1: don't it started like this. I could have been a
Speaker 1: b ry I don't know the name of it because
Speaker 1: it's stupid. I hate you know, you can't work with
Speaker 1: people that have zero accountability. They don't hold themselves to anything,
Speaker 1: right and Therefore, everything is a cope, an excuse, or
Speaker 1: a diff election and a redirect. You can't have an
Speaker 1: it person like that. You can't have any person like that.
Speaker 1: Everything is a throw the responsibility back on you type
Speaker 1: of guy. Or they just let their own projects that
Speaker 1: they think are way too highly of crumble and fall
Speaker 1: apart in front of their faces and blame everybody else
Speaker 1: for not supporting them. I'm gonna I'm I'm perfectly describing
Speaker 1: as a person right now. And if you're on FTJ
Speaker 1: Media as a content creator, you know exactly who I'm
Speaker 1: talking about. Well, I used to have an email what
Speaker 1: do you call it? An email service with the name
Speaker 1: Joshu dot net at the end of it. And there
Speaker 1: was a time when I got an email from some
Speaker 1: company that I looked up and it was from an
Speaker 1: Israeli company saying that they were going to start surveiling me.
Speaker 1: And because that email system crashed or was stopped being
Speaker 1: paid for and then was chansferred over to something else,
Speaker 1: all of my contacts are gone. Every last contact of
Speaker 1: mine is gone. And I had people that I was
Speaker 1: talking to for the show networking, famous people all gone.
Speaker 1: I have no contacts anymore, and there was that email
Speaker 1: that I looked at. I'd have to look through a
Speaker 1: thousand different videos of mine to find the one that
Speaker 1: I actually looked at it in. Anybody else wants to
Speaker 1: waste their time doing that, go for it. I did
Speaker 1: show it on screen, I read it on screen. I
Speaker 1: can't find it. It's not there anymore because all those
Speaker 1: messages that I had had on there were all deleted
Speaker 1: when the email service was transferred over to something else,
Speaker 1: it remained the same email. You know, ball blusters had
Speaker 1: Joshua dot net, but everything else about it, like everything
Speaker 1: that it had been said to me, it was gone.
Speaker 1: So I have no evidence unless I find that video.
Speaker 1: I don't think it was Celebrate because I don't think
Speaker 1: that's how they do it. It was some other company from
Speaker 1: Israel though, just Hey, I'm gonna just notifying me through
Speaker 1: the joshu account, which is odd. If they actually knew
Speaker 1: who I was, you think that they would send it
Speaker 1: to my, uh my main account, but they didn't, so
Speaker 1: I don't know if it was. No, it was legitimate,
Speaker 1: like it was a legitimate company, as legitimate as a
Speaker 1: fucking scumbag piece of shit, cocksucking child killing piece of
Speaker 1: shit is, But yeah, that was over a year ago,
Speaker 1: well over a year ago. And when I heard this name,
Speaker 1: I'm like, that sounds a lot like that company. I
Speaker 1: think there was a C and a B in it
Speaker 1: somewhere in that fucking name, but I can't remember. Oh,
Speaker 1: you piece of fucking worthless shit. There you go. All right,
Speaker 1: So there's that if anybody wants to trudge through my
Speaker 1: history of crap, which is awesome, by the way, but
Speaker 1: it's good crap. But can you imagine what going I
Speaker 1: can't remember even the timeframe of the year, of the when,
Speaker 1: of the how, of the what that it happened. I
Speaker 1: just remember sharing it on screen because I couldn't believe
Speaker 1: that had happened. And I was a little like what
Speaker 1: you know, But then this name came around and I
Speaker 1: was like, huh, and maybe think of it. Then I
Speaker 1: went back and looked for it. And my history doesn't
Speaker 1: go back far enough because it was cut off at
Speaker 1: the time that they transferred over, so all that other
Speaker 1: stuff was gone because that was a whole different you know,
Speaker 1: service and server. So all my old emails are goodbye bye.
Speaker 1: Isn't that nice? That nice? Fuck those people? You know
Speaker 1: exactly what I'm talking about if you're on adj but
Speaker 1: it's okay, it wasn't. You know what, how about this
Speaker 1: if it cost him something, it wasn't. It's not up
Speaker 1: to me to think that he should have kept it going.
Speaker 1: Sound that sad. That's not fair for me to say that. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's plain. I'm on the right side, the same left side,
Speaker 1: but raate side. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Sure, Brailan's technology being used to hack your phone, let's
Speaker 3: find out.
Speaker 1: Is really technology. I'm not sure why that's cut itself off,
Speaker 1: but that's what he said. Is really a competing bil.
Speaker 3: I'm Nick Hanna, criminal lawyer, and welcome to the first
Speaker 3: episode of The What and the Why on this channel.
Speaker 3: I'll break down some of the most important criminal justice
Speaker 3: issues that you won't hear about in the mainstream media. Today.
Speaker 3: I'm going to take a deep dive into the Israeli
Speaker 3: digital intelligence giants celebrate and explain how which technology is
Speaker 3: being used on a mascal by police and government agencies
Speaker 3: in Australia and around the world. Now you might be asking, Okay,
Speaker 3: is this just about the cops getting into the phones
Speaker 3: of criminals. If so, what's the big deal. Well, in
Speaker 3: this video, I'm going to explain why there's a whole
Speaker 3: lot more to the story and how the use of
Speaker 3: celebrate technology in Australia.
Speaker 1: Well, I'll help you explain it.
Speaker 4: Ye.
Speaker 1: First of all, what is it that's criminal? We can't
Speaker 1: be using our definitions criminal to a demonic, diabolical, mass murdering,
Speaker 1: child killing, psychopath means anybody that they don't like, which
Speaker 1: is everybody that isn't them. So that's the reason why criminal,
Speaker 1: the word criminal should be in air quotes. That's why
Speaker 1: it's a problem, because they will criminalize everybody that isn't
Speaker 1: them who they hate. That's why they could be hacking
Speaker 1: your children's phones. Do you understand what I'm saying here?
Speaker 1: You don't need to have made it. You know, a
Speaker 1: crime is going against or resisting their crimes. That makes
Speaker 1: you a criminal. That's how the system has worked forever
Speaker 1: for over one hundred and fifty years. If you resist
Speaker 1: the criminal system that has it's not legitimate, but it
Speaker 1: has legitimized itself in the face of the people who
Speaker 1: are rehearted who still support it. You're the bad guy
Speaker 1: and that's not okay. Do you get it now? Why
Speaker 1: this is bad? Because they are the evil ones and
Speaker 1: They're going to dictate who the criminal is through their perspective,
Speaker 1: just like they wrote that fucking book through their perspective,
Speaker 1: and you thought it was some holy book by a god. Oh,
Speaker 1: this God's word. No, it's the fucking demonic cult's word.
Speaker 1: The Old Testament is the Tanak is a piece of
Speaker 1: fucking shit. You should be flushing it down to goddamn toilet.
Speaker 3: It raises serious privacy concerns for all of us. I'm
Speaker 3: going to start by looking at the darker side of Celebrate,
Speaker 3: but most people don't know about the company's extremely close
Speaker 3: ties with the Israeli military, particularly the infamous cyber warfare
Speaker 3: Unit eighty two hundred, as well as the assistance it's
Speaker 3: provided to repressive regimes around the globe. Then I'm going
Speaker 3: to look at how insanely advanced and far reaching Celebrate
Speaker 3: surveillance capabilities are and how it can download all of
Speaker 3: your phone and social media data, as well as a
Speaker 3: ton of information about you that you wouldn't even know exists.
Speaker 3: After that, I'm going to explain how Celebrite products are
Speaker 3: being used by law enforcement and other government agencies on
Speaker 3: a large scale with very few restrictions and no rell oversight.
Speaker 3: I'll show how it's not just being used to download
Speaker 3: the phones of criminals, but also victims and witnesses of
Speaker 3: crime and countless innocent people. Finally, I'm going to talk
Speaker 3: about what happens with all of this highly sensitive data
Speaker 3: that's being downloaded from our phones. In doing so, i'll
Speaker 3: show you why there's a real risk that Celebrate may
Speaker 3: be able to access our data, and why that's something
Speaker 3: we should all be worried about. So let's start by
Speaker 3: talking a bit about the company itself. Celebrate is an
Speaker 3: Israeli surveillance company that sells software for the collection and
Speaker 3: analysis of digital data. It's best known for its ability
Speaker 3: to hack my bar phones, but that's just one of
Speaker 3: many products that it offers. Celebrate has thousands of clients
Speaker 3: across the globe, including law enforcement and spy agencies, foreign militaries,
Speaker 3: and private corporations. Celebrate's headquarters are located just outside Tel Aviv,
Speaker 3: but it has offices around world, including here in Australia.
Speaker 3: On its website, the company says that its core values
Speaker 3: are personal privacy, public safety, transparency, and respect for individual riots.
Speaker 3: But there's some good reasons to doubt this claim. For starters.
Speaker 3: Celebrate has very close ties with the Israeli military, which
Speaker 3: is not exactly known for its respect for human rights.
Speaker 3: Until recently, the company has been run by its long
Speaker 3: term CEO, Yosi Kamel, who was formerly a lieutenant colonel
Speaker 3: in the elite Israeli Paratry Brigade and after that held
Speaker 3: a senior position in the Israeli Ministry of Defense. In
Speaker 3: twenty twenty one, Karma admitted that most celebrit employees come
Speaker 3: from the infamous Israeli Unit eighty two hundred or similar units.
Speaker 3: Now to understand why that's so important, we need to
Speaker 3: talk a bit about Unit eighty two hundred. Unit eighty
Speaker 3: two hundred is the main intelligence and cyber warfare unit
Speaker 3: of the Israeli military. Historically, its primary goal has been
Speaker 3: the mass surveillance of Palestinians and the populations in neighboring
Speaker 3: Arab countries. To give you an idea of what Unit
Speaker 3: eighty two hundred gets up to, in twenty fourteen, a
Speaker 3: few dozen reserves it's from the unit published an open
Speaker 3: letter to the Israeli government in which they refuse to
Speaker 3: continue their service due to the unit's mass surveillance and
Speaker 3: persecution of innocent Palestinians. In another open letter published at
Speaker 3: around the same time, a Unit eighty two hundred whistleblower
Speaker 3: described how the unit collects highly sensitive personal information from
Speaker 3: Palestinian civilian like if they're a closet homosexual, they're cheating
Speaker 3: on their wife, or they're in need of urgent medical treatment,
Speaker 3: and then use that information to blackmail them into becoming informants.
Speaker 3: Here is one of the eighty two hundred whistleblowers being
Speaker 3: interviewed in twenty fourteen.
Speaker 5: The problem is that the goal of what the unit
Speaker 5: does in regards.
Speaker 1: With Palestinians is not just self defense.
Speaker 2: It's upholding a military regime, which means to oppress the population.
Speaker 1: It means to weaken the political system of the Palestinians
Speaker 1: so that they can't improve their situation, so that the
Speaker 1: military regime continues.
Speaker 3: Over time, Unit eighty two hundreds capabilities have expanded and
Speaker 3: is now considered to be one of the foremost intelligence
Speaker 3: agencies in the world. It operates out of the Urine
Speaker 3: Base in the Negative Desert, one of the most powerful
Speaker 3: intelligence gathering sites on the planet. From there, it monitors
Speaker 3: phone calls and electronic communications throughout the Middle East, Europe, Africa,
Speaker 3: and Asia. It is also reported to run covert listening
Speaker 3: posts in Israeli embassies abroad, and it's known to cooperate
Speaker 3: closely with the USA's National Security Agency. Yeah, what does
Speaker 3: Unit eighty two hundred do with all of this data
Speaker 3: that it collects?
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, I say, two hundred coming up a lot. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's a that's a problem. So here's I'm trying to
Speaker 1: explain this. I'm trying to trying to think of this
Speaker 1: myself to myself to try to make sense of certain things,
Speaker 1: and this is basically the best way I can probably
Speaker 1: explain it. And I think, Okay, we obviously are not America.
Speaker 1: This idea that there's separate countries when you have centralized
Speaker 1: banking cartel cult running most countries, including our own, and
Speaker 1: US being the headquarters for them now used to be
Speaker 1: the Bank of England. Now it's the Federal Reserve and
Speaker 1: all of the other things that go along with that.
Speaker 1: So the cryporatocracy is set up because it's an extension
Speaker 1: of them, of that cult. Obviously, you can see what
Speaker 1: CEO is. They place in positions they're selected to become
Speaker 1: mega corporations. Through there, they have massive power. They have
Speaker 1: unlimited funding to do whatever they want to do, and
Speaker 1: they can do things that governments at least in order
Speaker 1: to keep the people that you know, appeased, the masses.
Speaker 1: They have other they have extended powers that the governments
Speaker 1: don't have. But it doesn't matter because the line gets
Speaker 1: blurred all the time. And by setting up corporations, they
Speaker 1: can then siphon out the funding with the wealth of
Speaker 1: the nation to all of their diabolical schemes around the world.
Speaker 1: So that's why there's a separation too, and that's why
Speaker 1: they set this up, because they're getting rich by siphoning
Speaker 1: the wealth. But they already are the ones who print
Speaker 1: the money, the real wealth, the true wealth, the property,
Speaker 1: the gold, all the things that to them make a
Speaker 1: difference that are of any value. They have full control
Speaker 1: over and our destinies. So I guess that's the best
Speaker 1: way to put it. The surveillance thing and thinking that
Speaker 1: there's lines than there's certain you know, checks and balances,
Speaker 1: that's all silly. We are, and we have been Israel
Speaker 1: before Israel was ever Israel. But is that really even
Speaker 1: a thing or is it just an extension of this
Speaker 1: monster that has taken over all all of mankind. The
Speaker 1: answer to that, unfortunately, it would be yes. So these
Speaker 1: separate little companies are just details and attributes of the whole.
Speaker 1: And when you look at it like that, it's pretty
Speaker 1: pretty horrible. So what that email had said way back
Speaker 1: when was that they were going to surveial my online activity.
Speaker 1: That should make people little stand office, right, like, what
Speaker 1: what did I do? And I think there's like almost
Speaker 1: like two years ago. Some dope could have just sent that.
Speaker 1: It could have been nothing, but who knows. The company
Speaker 1: was real and it was Israel. It was real and
Speaker 1: it was Israel.
Speaker 3: Well much of that is of course kept under wraps.
Speaker 3: One of the more chilling examples that was exposed by
Speaker 3: an Israeli meter outlet last year is the artificial intelligence
Speaker 3: targeting system known as Lavender, which was developed by Unit
Speaker 3: eighty two hundred. Is an AI system that processes all
Speaker 3: of the phone and other data the unit is collected
Speaker 3: and then uses it to create lists of people in
Speaker 3: Gaza to be killed by the Israeli military.
Speaker 1: And volunteer organizes all that for the AI, that's their software.
Speaker 3: Israeli sources are disclosed, how there is minimal human overside
Speaker 3: of the system. And more concerningly, how the Israeli Army
Speaker 3: pre authorizes allowances for the estimated number of civilians who
Speaker 3: can be killed in each strike, as is explained in
Speaker 3: this video published by Vox.
Speaker 1: So pretty much all unarmed, they're pretty much all non
Speaker 1: harmas non this and that. That's the boogeyman. To keep
Speaker 1: the you know, when you're when you're explaining why you're
Speaker 1: killing off an entire group of people, you got to
Speaker 1: have a bad guy.
Speaker 6: This old reporter is that for every junior Hamas operative
Speaker 6: that Lavender marked, it was permissible to kill up to
Speaker 6: fifteen or twenty civilians. But also with that for some
Speaker 6: targets the number of promissives all civilian casualties was as
Speaker 6: high as three hundred.
Speaker 1: The cyber and other Lake a Whole Hospital serry.
Speaker 3: Operations that eighty two hundred has been involved in have
Speaker 3: not just been directed against Palestine.
Speaker 1: And the targets can be as simple as people with
Speaker 1: newborn babies killing the babies, killing the people, but they
Speaker 1: like to kill the children first.
Speaker 3: But also foreign states including Syria, Lebanon and Iran, for example.
Speaker 3: Eighty two hundred played a key role in the planning
Speaker 3: of Israel's unilateral military strikes against Iran last month, which
Speaker 3: left hundreds of Iranians dead. Unit eighty two hundred is
Speaker 3: also believed to have played a key role in the
Speaker 3: Page attacks in Lebanon last September.
Speaker 1: And if you who didn't pick up on this yet,
Speaker 1: I think Cash Battel's girlfriend was from there. They don't
Speaker 1: live together, though he lives with the dude.
Speaker 3: When Israel simultaneously detonated thousands of explosive devices it had
Speaker 3: concealed inside Pages, killing and maiming thousands of Lebanese citizens,
Speaker 3: both Hesbola fighters and civilians, including numerous children, the attack
Speaker 3: was widely condemned by human rights experts as violating international law,
Speaker 3: and even PHARMACYI directed Leon Panetta described it as a
Speaker 3: form of terrorism.
Speaker 2: Is it terrorism? I don't think there's any question that
Speaker 2: it's a form of terrorism.
Speaker 3: I was in South Bay during the Pager attack, and
Speaker 3: I remember the chaos on the streets and the feeling
Speaker 3: of terror that swept across the city.
Speaker 1: And remember right after that there were other lithium mia
Speaker 1: battery explosions going on smart cars, bikes like scooters. That
Speaker 1: was just the first round. I don't know why they
Speaker 1: don't talk about the second round. There was like three
Speaker 1: weeks of terror going on where they were showing that
Speaker 1: at any given time they could blow up anything. That's
Speaker 1: like in evy device electronic.
Speaker 3: Now, you might think that with eighty two hundreds track record,
Speaker 3: Celebrate might try to distance itself from the unit for
Speaker 3: pr reasons. Well, that's definitely not the case.
Speaker 1: In fact, so these things at their core are created
Speaker 1: and designed so that you can overload the batteries through
Speaker 1: sending there to signal that triggers the software that they've
Speaker 1: already put into your phones and any other device that
Speaker 1: you have, as I pushed my phone for a little
Speaker 1: way from me a little bit at any given time
Speaker 1: that they want to and that's it's like blackmail, right,
Speaker 1: it's like a terrorism blackmail. You better behave, better behave
Speaker 1: because you have a little piece of Israeli in your bucket.
Speaker 3: But it promotes the fact that it's made up of
Speaker 3: Unit eighty two hundred veterans is one of its key
Speaker 3: selling points. For example, as you can see in this
Speaker 3: presentation for investors, Celebrate boasts about having world class talent
Speaker 3: from the unit and that this gives the company a
Speaker 3: competitive advantage by generating unmatched capabilities. And it's not just
Speaker 3: low level employees who are ex Israeli intelligence, but many
Speaker 3: people who occupy senior positions in the company. For example,
Speaker 3: the company's long standing CFO, Dana Gerner, is a Unit
Speaker 3: eighty two hundred veteran, a fact which she openly discloses
Speaker 3: on a LinkedIn page. Governor is also a director of
Speaker 3: Celebrate's local branch, Celebrate Australia, which is based in Canberra. Now,
Speaker 3: this relationship between Celebrate and former eighty two hundred members
Speaker 3: has been the subject of an excellent reporting, including by
Speaker 3: the Jewish Australian journalist Anthony Lowenstein, who authored a very
Speaker 3: important book called The Palestine Laboratory. But what hasn't been
Speaker 3: talked about a lot is the ongoing relationship between Celebrate
Speaker 3: and the Israeli Army. Because he might be thinking, Okay, sure,
Speaker 3: Celebrate is full of former eighty two hundred hackers with
Speaker 3: a shady past, but these guys might have put that
Speaker 3: chapter behind them and now they're just living like.
Speaker 1: You don't get to do that, You don't get to
Speaker 1: facilitate the mass murder of innocent people and then be like, oh,
Speaker 1: I've turned over a new leave. No ale, you need
Speaker 1: to be swinging from a tree for your crimes, almost
Speaker 1: civilians or but they're sanctioned crimes. They're they're they're you're
Speaker 1: doing you're doing governmental work. It's it's all, it's all legitimized.
Speaker 1: So therefore is it a crime? Yes, it mostly is
Speaker 1: in the most standard sense of the word, but not
Speaker 1: through their eyes.
Speaker 3: Tech bros. Well, it's important to understand that, like all
Speaker 3: soldiers who have served in the Israeli military, eighty two
Speaker 3: hundred veterans must return for compulsory service as reserves each year.
Speaker 3: The length of this annual service judy used to be
Speaker 3: up to three weeks, but it's been significantly extended during
Speaker 3: Israel's war on Gaza over the past twenty months.
Speaker 1: That's interesting.
Speaker 3: So there is this ongoing exchange of information between the
Speaker 3: unit's current.
Speaker 1: And form cash where's your girlfriend going just to Israel
Speaker 1: for a couple of weeks from.
Speaker 3: The members, which has Forbes reported in the Glowing article
Speaker 3: of that unit eighty two hundred and twenty fifteen allows
Speaker 3: the unit's veterans to get a peek into the latest
Speaker 3: technology being developed by the younger successors. And let's be clear,
Speaker 3: about what kind of technology this is. It's technology that
Speaker 3: is used for mass surveillance in the West Bank, mass
Speaker 3: killing in Gaza, and for cyber warfare in neighboring countries.
Speaker 3: Beyond this overlap between the company and Israeli intelligence personnel,
Speaker 3: Celebrate appears to be actively supporting the Israel as it
Speaker 3: carries out its brutal offensive in Gaza, which is consistently.
Speaker 1: Remember this is just Celebrate. So if you don't hear
Speaker 1: America a lot, but you did, they are here. But
Speaker 1: if you don't hear them a lot, it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: because the eighty two hundred unit that makes this one
Speaker 1: company is also here in various other capacities doing the
Speaker 1: very saving thing here now just because they haven't gone
Speaker 1: out of that we're aware of. Because they own the
Speaker 1: media remembers, so they can black it out any mass
Speaker 1: killing strikes or targeted attacks on people who would be
Speaker 1: I don't know. Good leaders in a resistance movement doesn't
Speaker 1: mean it's not happening, or that their lists aren't being made,
Speaker 1: and most certainly are. That's why this hesitation. In the
Speaker 1: art of war, hesitation favors only the enemy you're going
Speaker 1: to be put in checkmate before you even get to
Speaker 1: start the game.
Speaker 3: It's being genocide by most human rights organizations and genocide scholars.
Speaker 1: That's awful.
Speaker 3: Look at that place in the early days of Israel's
Speaker 3: military onslaughter in Gaza. Celebrate admitted on Instagram how proud
Speaker 3: it is to stand beside its IDF soldiers and how
Speaker 3: to dispatch final equipment, food, mobile charges and clothing to
Speaker 3: the front lines. There are two photos from this post
Speaker 3: that I want to show you. In the first shot,
Speaker 3: you can see soldiers with a box of goodies gifted
Speaker 3: by Celebrated. In the second shot, you can see armed
Speaker 3: soldiers who either.
Speaker 1: Are massms chili killers.
Speaker 3: Here to be in Gaza or getting ready to invade Gaza.
Speaker 1: Celebrate doing good. Yeah, you're doing good. Yeah. It's all
Speaker 1: about the definitions of the words. Right, these are our spells.
Speaker 1: They're doing good, all right, we're to you get to
Speaker 1: filter that through the mind of a mass mirroring sociopathic,
Speaker 1: psychopathic child killer. What do they consider good? Good is
Speaker 1: whatever serves their interests, That's what good is. Anything that
Speaker 1: doesn't serve their interest that's bad.
Speaker 3: Wearing T shirts don't aided by Celebrate emblazoned with the
Speaker 3: company slogan doing good, Yes, doing good in November twenty.
Speaker 1: Twenty sounds awful out like Google's old don't do evil
Speaker 1: right right three.
Speaker 3: When Israel's Grand offensive in Gaza was in full effect,
Speaker 3: then CEO Yosi Kamal said that those on the front
Speaker 3: line are risking their lives for the country. Our mission
Speaker 3: is to take care of economic security during the war
Speaker 3: and the day after. More importantly, though, he went on
Speaker 3: to say that Celebrate had done a lot to assist
Speaker 3: is rarely law enforcement and special operations in times of crisis,
Speaker 3: but said he couldn't discuss this in detail now. The
Speaker 3: precise nature of celebrates involvement in Gaza is of course
Speaker 3: shrouded in secrecy. We know that the Israeli army is
Speaker 3: using it to crack the phones of Palestine as it
Speaker 3: takes captive in the besieged enclave.
Speaker 1: Yeah, not to mention the fact that, yeah, they're cracking
Speaker 1: phones so they can find other people, but they can
Speaker 1: also do you locate you? I wish I had my friend.
Speaker 1: I'll be read back. I gotta go g rebsence intually.
Speaker 3: And it's also been reported in the Israeli military, but
Speaker 3: Celebrates received funding from the Pentagon to develop a product
Speaker 3: to identify it map and expose what it describes as
Speaker 3: Hamas terrorists, which, as we've seen over the last twenty months,
Speaker 3: can mean anyone from journalists to doctors, bakers, and even
Speaker 3: school children. But beyond this, we're really in the dark
Speaker 3: about Celebrate's role in Gaza. Apart from Gaza, Celebrate also
Speaker 3: plays an important role in the military occupation of the
Speaker 3: West Bank. For example, the Israeli Army uses the company
Speaker 3: software to hack the phones that are seizes not only
Speaker 3: from Palestinians, but also countless foreign peace activists and journalists there.
Speaker 3: This use of Celebrate technology is of course unlawful in
Speaker 3: circumstances where Israel's occupation of the Palestine territories itself is unlawful,
Speaker 3: as was recently confirmed by the International Court of Justice
Speaker 3: in its advisory opinion handed down in July last year.
Speaker 3: Beyond Palestine, human rights groups have long acous celebratee of
Speaker 3: aiding various authoritarian governments around the world. In twenty sixteen,
Speaker 3: it was revealed that the beahin Any regime, which is
Speaker 3: one of the worst human rights records in the world,
Speaker 3: was a client of Celebrate, and it use this technology
Speaker 3: to download the phone of a blogger who had reportedly
Speaker 3: been arrested and tortured simply for speaking out against human
Speaker 3: rights abuses.
Speaker 7: There.
Speaker 3: In twenty seventeen, Celebrate was used against Reuter's journalists.
Speaker 1: All Right, I'm gonna have to try to do this
Speaker 1: so that you can see it. So just give me
Speaker 1: a second. And fucked this up and i'd have to
Speaker 1: change my direction. Maybe ain't not, Yeah, maybe I'll just
Speaker 1: go like this. There you go. I can't shoot the
Speaker 1: whole thing. Can shoot this thing? You see the You
Speaker 1: see that chip at Sagnel's cards, That's how you can
Speaker 1: make them tappable. That's a GPS location chip. Now I
Speaker 1: don't think I still have my it's probably not in
Speaker 1: this part. Yeah. What's funny is that they don't put
Speaker 1: them on the driver's licenses, which I'm surprised yet that
Speaker 1: I see not on the ones I have. But my
Speaker 1: old military idea, which I think is in a different
Speaker 1: pocket or something or a different wallet. Now I had
Speaker 1: it for a while. I'm not sure why it's not
Speaker 1: in here now, No, it's not in here. That is
Speaker 1: where I first saw one of those chips, so they
Speaker 1: could locate us if we were dumb enough to take
Speaker 1: an idea with us. Now, that is the same thing
Speaker 1: that that chip there looks very very much like you're like,
Speaker 1: you're I mean, look at it and then look at
Speaker 1: what a sim card looks like. That's how they find you.
Speaker 1: Ms mmmm. That one.
Speaker 3: To me and ma who would charged with publishing evidence
Speaker 3: of a massacre of over hinga people. In twenty twenty one,
Speaker 3: the is raelly media outlets are It's published an article
Speaker 3: claiming that Celebrate was being used by the Bangladeshi paramilitary unit,
Speaker 3: the Rapid Action Battalion, which is accused of extra judicial
Speaker 3: killings and torture of hundreds of civilians.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, forgive my apprehensiveness today or I'm going to
Speaker 1: try really hard to be mindful of it. But every
Speaker 1: day that I have to pay bills, I become very
Speaker 1: uh hostile because most of them I don't feel like
Speaker 1: I should be paying, especially my car insurance. At the
Speaker 1: level that it's at, it seems a little bit insane.
Speaker 1: And here's the other thing I am going to say this.
Speaker 1: I want somebody out there please please help me just
Speaker 1: figure this out if it's factual or not. I think
Speaker 1: it is. I think that we're getting we're getting categorized
Speaker 1: and penalized through some sort of calculation that has been
Speaker 1: not disclosed, and probably keep it kept secret if you
Speaker 1: have a vehicle prior to two thousand and five, when
Speaker 1: a lot more of the computer system shit went in
Speaker 1: and then it ended. Every successive year after that they
Speaker 1: have put more and more stuff in, and as Lewis
Speaker 1: Rossmiths said, since like twenty twelve or thirteen, GMC has
Speaker 1: been reporting all of your your driving data to your
Speaker 1: insurance to insurance companies. So they offered me a quote
Speaker 1: unquote discount if I installed an app and left it
Speaker 1: running all the time, not just when an apps on,
Speaker 1: but it had to be on a certain setting and
Speaker 1: it had to follow me on my phone wherever I went,
Speaker 1: so even when I'm not in the vehicle. That's why
Speaker 1: I said no. But they were like, oh, you'll get
Speaker 1: like fifty bucks off your your your car insurance if
Speaker 1: you let us monitor every goddamn thing you do. And
Speaker 1: at first I was looking at it and I read
Speaker 1: it and I'm like no, And I uninstalled it from
Speaker 1: my phone before I even opened it up and finished,
Speaker 1: you know, filling it out to identify me, I uninstalled it,
Speaker 1: and they kept on giving me these emails we haven't
Speaker 1: received any of your data. Well good, that's the whole point.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to sign up for it. So one
Speaker 1: month my insurance was a little bit cheaper, then went
Speaker 1: back up again and they're like, we have canceled your
Speaker 1: your discount. And I'm thinking to myself, well, is it
Speaker 1: a discount or is this a penalty for not letting
Speaker 1: them track everything that you do? So if you have
Speaker 1: a car that's older, that doesn't already have all the
Speaker 1: sensors in there, that does it against your will anyway,
Speaker 1: without your knowledge, sends all this data to insurance companies
Speaker 1: for them to like pick through to find find their clients.
Speaker 1: And I'm sure there's there's a handshake of money made
Speaker 1: there between them. Is that really? Is that really a
Speaker 1: discount or is not having it installed an actual penalty?
Speaker 1: So is there a penalty for people who have older
Speaker 1: vehicles that don't want to be survelled? I think there is,
Speaker 1: and I think if we figured this out, I think
Speaker 1: there could be a massive class action lawsuit against all
Speaker 1: car insurance companies that do this, which are basically all
Speaker 1: of them. If anybody wants to look deeper into that.
Speaker 1: I have USAA, but that doesn't mean anything. They probably
Speaker 1: send it out to someone else, and it's probably someone
Speaker 1: else that actually carries it. I don't know, third party
Speaker 1: or whatever. But just understand that don't put that stuff
Speaker 1: on your phone. There's enough of this shit on your
Speaker 1: phone already. The fact that your phone is in your
Speaker 1: car anyway. Honestly, they could get that information if they
Speaker 1: want to do anyway, if you ride around with your
Speaker 1: phone in your car, which they basically tell you that
Speaker 1: you have to if you're gonna get that discount, you
Speaker 1: can't leave your phone at home. Is that crazy? But
Speaker 1: there's stuff already installed in newer cars that do this anyway,
Speaker 1: regardless if you want it to or not. You can't
Speaker 1: stop it. It's like it's like in the interworkings of
Speaker 1: your quote unquote sensors and all this other stuff. Anyway,
Speaker 1: all that data gets sent out to other people that
Speaker 1: you don't know are collecting that data and organizing it
Speaker 1: and making sense of it. That's pretty messed up, and
Speaker 1: another indication that we are under constant surveillance. We're being
Speaker 1: penalized for not being part of the system. Already, This
Speaker 1: is almost like a social credit score, just you know,
Speaker 1: violation or a fine because they're taking money, additional money
Speaker 1: away from you for not having, you know, without granting
Speaker 1: them full access to every goddamn move you make. And
Speaker 1: who knows, Like there's iPhones have all kinds of sensors
Speaker 1: on it. They know when you pick it up, they
Speaker 1: know when you move it, they know when you squeeze
Speaker 1: on the sides. You know, they can they can determine
Speaker 1: if you're mad if you squeeze your phone. Like, there's
Speaker 1: all kinds of shit that's already on iPhones and Samsung.
Speaker 1: Samsung and iPhone are very very much the same in
Speaker 1: the in the way that they are malicious against the user,
Speaker 1: the person who bought it. This Lewis Rossman is a
Speaker 1: wealth of information and it gets you thinking about other
Speaker 1: things and aspects in your life. I actually brought this
Speaker 1: up in a comment, but he's like got two million followers,
Speaker 1: and I don't think anybody should be reading their comments
Speaker 1: after a certain point anyway, because it's like they'll drive you,
Speaker 1: drive you batty. Not you guys. Most of you guys
Speaker 1: say really awesome things, and that's very appreciated. Stanley, You're awesome, Karen.
Speaker 1: You know who you guys are, Archangel all the rest
Speaker 1: the ones I haven't mentioned as well, a Saxon Ranger
Speaker 1: or a Voodoo Ranger. I could go on and on
Speaker 1: and on and on, but you guys are great, all right,
Speaker 1: So moving on, and by the way, great for stocking stuffers.
Speaker 1: The hot sauce, the six ounce bottles or the twelve
Speaker 1: houns battles create stocking stuffers. I'm just saying I got
Speaker 1: the twelve ounce battles and you guys are interested, man, bam,
Speaker 1: best hot sauce in the world for your people on
Speaker 1: your list.
Speaker 3: In the same year, the Committee to Protect Journalists documented
Speaker 3: the use of celebrit in Botswana to examine the phones
Speaker 3: of journalists who had been arrested in relation to Facebook
Speaker 3: posts about COVID nineteen. And these are just four of
Speaker 3: countless examples of Celebrate being allegedly used by ragings with
Speaker 3: appalling human rights records. Other notable celebrates you.
Speaker 1: Mean, like America, we have the worst human rights record
Speaker 1: ever because we're the ones funding if our country is
Speaker 1: funding the war efforts or the murder efforts of another
Speaker 1: country or another you know, quote unquote, you know Republic
Speaker 1: who's really who's really doing what? That's a proxy war.
Speaker 1: If you're funding it, that's not just saying you support
Speaker 1: their cause. And you know it's some noble bullshit cause
Speaker 1: that you're selling to the American people. No, that's an
Speaker 1: American effort quote unquote American. But you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a Jewish banking cartel, or the Saturn cult
Speaker 1: banking cartel, if you want to be more PC about it,
Speaker 1: because there's all and we're going to get into this too.
Speaker 1: Remember how I said, even as far back as five
Speaker 1: thousand years ago, there were Gothic Arians, lat you know,
Speaker 1: or European type people in this cult. And that's why
Speaker 1: you see a cooperation, because they're at the very core
Speaker 1: of it. But also there's been times in history where
Speaker 1: this OAVEI or jew Jewish side of things has purposely
Speaker 1: been intentionally mingled with European type people to better their
Speaker 1: genetic makeup. And this is going right back to the
Speaker 1: Young Frankenstein thing that Mill Brooks movie. You mean to
Speaker 1: tell me that I've an abnormal brain into an eight
Speaker 1: foot tall monster. Yes, yes, that mentality, that sociopathic non empathy,
Speaker 1: indifferent to their own atrocities, in a much larger, much
Speaker 1: more attractive, much stronger individual. Isn't that something? And they've
Speaker 1: been doing this deliberately and there's proof of it, and
Speaker 1: hopefully I can get to it today to show you
Speaker 1: they even did this by stealing children after World War Two.
Speaker 1: If this is you, guys can fact check this. I
Speaker 1: have yet to do too deep of a dive on it,
Speaker 1: but it appears to be and it just seems like
Speaker 1: one of those things that just seems like common sense.
Speaker 1: But that wouldn't have been the first time, because Kazaria
Speaker 1: was made up of Scythian Scythian intermingling with a different
Speaker 1: type of person like the Turk Shaska Nazi that made
Speaker 1: up the quote unquote crazy Kazarians. So it's already happened
Speaker 1: before and throughout history. They have changed their appearance from
Speaker 1: being quite disfigured, almost like weird looking people almost like
Speaker 1: go like into hard to discern who's who now and
Speaker 1: then they say we're not. Wait, well, you probably are
Speaker 1: half at least or maybe a third. By however many
Speaker 1: times you've you know, had sex since then and had
Speaker 1: another generation of children. But that's a key core element
Speaker 1: is that they wanted to absorb us into them and
Speaker 1: then kill us off. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Pretty interesting
Speaker 1: tactic take the best genetics of everybody and mix them
Speaker 1: into them, and then kill off the pure bloods.
Speaker 3: Let's include the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and
Speaker 3: Georgia in the West. Celebrit products were also used in
Speaker 3: ways that many would find very controversial. For example, in
Speaker 3: the USA, some universities have been accused of using celebrite
Speaker 3: technology as part of their crackdown on students engaging in
Speaker 3: peaceful propelas.
Speaker 1: Okay, again proof that there are no barriers. So this
Speaker 1: shows maliciousness against the American people by the American government
Speaker 1: utilizing what they call Israeli companies. Okay, maybe that's where
Speaker 1: they're from. But who set up that country, who brought
Speaker 1: it into fruition, who fought two wars for it? Who
Speaker 1: created the Bolshevik revolution that then went on in murder
Speaker 1: rampage throughout Russia and Europe, and then went on a
Speaker 1: rape rampage through Germany, changing the the you know, the
Speaker 1: race forever quote unquote as that one psychopath was calling
Speaker 1: for in Russia. Remember, there weren't Russians, they were Bolshevik Jews,
Speaker 1: and it wasn't it. It was a hostile takeover. After
Speaker 1: being treated well, very well for over three hundred years
Speaker 1: or more, they decided to do that. Given freeland, given seeds,
Speaker 1: training and how to be good farmers so that they
Speaker 1: could build something for themselves. They were offended by the
Speaker 1: very idea of having to work, and therefore they would
Speaker 1: not and they would constantly get right back into selling
Speaker 1: alcohol and robbing people of their labor and of their
Speaker 1: own food supply to feed their families because they would
Speaker 1: get in debt with these taverns. It's all in the
Speaker 1: book two hundred Years together. It's very very interesting history.
Speaker 1: And they had everything handed to them, they had preferential treatment,
Speaker 1: and they still went on to kill crazy rampage crying
Speaker 1: about how they were being treated. It doesn't matter what
Speaker 1: you do for these people, they're still going to present
Speaker 1: it as if they're not on top. If you don't
Speaker 1: roll over and hand them over your kingdom, you're oppressing them.
Speaker 3: Fund activities on campus. Celebride is also used extensively by
Speaker 3: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement or EYES, which perhaps explain
Speaker 3: why the companies share price hit an all time high
Speaker 3: on the day after the election victory of Donald Trump,
Speaker 3: who had campaigns on an aggressively anti immigration platform. And
Speaker 3: this is nothing new, really.
Speaker 1: You see are you seeing the scam here? Are you
Speaker 1: seeing how this is just becoming more evident, more of
Speaker 1: the true nature of what actually controls this place and
Speaker 1: has controlled it coming to the surface in a slow drip,
Speaker 1: And well, do you know it's it's it's a changes
Speaker 1: people's perspective when it comes through in corporations and utilization
Speaker 1: of their But this is this is all against the
Speaker 1: very framework of our country, which would be the constitution,
Speaker 1: the Bill of rights. This is making the people the
Speaker 1: target and the enemy of surveillance by the by the country,
Speaker 1: and by foreign what do you call entities who may
Speaker 1: do other horrible things with that information outside of what
Speaker 1: horrible things will be handled in America. I mean, you
Speaker 1: do realize that forever they have utilized our countries agencies
Speaker 1: and police and all these other things have utilized criminals,
Speaker 1: confidential informants, homeless people, drug addicts and weaponize them cartel's
Speaker 1: street gangs. You know, like I forgot what his name was,
Speaker 1: the one the one guy that was murdered that was
Speaker 1: the you know, the Clinton on the Clinton staff he
Speaker 1: was murdered by a quote unquote gang member. They do
Speaker 1: this stuff. They incentivize you're not going to go to jail.
Speaker 1: We want you to take care of a problem for us.
Speaker 1: They can do these things underhandedly all over the place
Speaker 1: to get rid of problems. They don't have to specifically
Speaker 1: directly target you with quote unquote a fit or authorities
Speaker 1: and police. They can have the lowest scum who they
Speaker 1: work with because they're running the drugs with them. Because
Speaker 1: that's another oive slash Jewish banking cult industry is drug running.
Speaker 1: So that's why the CIA is involved in it, because
Speaker 1: the CIA was set up for this very cult to
Speaker 1: utilize here and elsewhere they can have the biggest and
Speaker 1: so this this expands their their territory and they reached vastly.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of what those messages on Twitter were
Speaker 1: kind of showing when they were when they're being brazen
Speaker 1: about it and saying that they're going to come into
Speaker 1: that person's house, giving them the you know, doxing their
Speaker 1: address online and saying is this where you are? They're
Speaker 1: texting him specifically and telling them like how did that
Speaker 1: person get their number? Why are they telling him that
Speaker 1: they're going to go kill him, and they're saying you're
Speaker 1: a racist because of some posts that you put on online.
Speaker 1: So now, how did that all these other people get
Speaker 1: his information unless some agency government who knows how to
Speaker 1: get people's information and then linked it to people and
Speaker 1: said take care of our problem for us. And then
Speaker 1: that's one of the guys that I'm sending this to
Speaker 1: the FBI. The person replied back, without fear, ha ha ha,
Speaker 1: like I give a shit, like any of us give
Speaker 1: a shit, Meaning they're not going to give away the
Speaker 1: fact that they have been given authorization to murder you
Speaker 1: and your family. That's got to be the little secret.
Speaker 1: But they're not afraid of that outcome either. That's this
Speaker 1: is this is getting really bad because they're going after
Speaker 1: people who are just speaking out, questioning things, or who
Speaker 1: have had enough of the nonsense. And these are just
Speaker 1: regular people who just happen to have you know, a
Speaker 1: following on social media being targeted. Some of them are
Speaker 1: fake too, some of some of them are grifting and
Speaker 1: have a gift gifts and go out and or a
Speaker 1: GoFundMe involved in support them against their you know, the
Speaker 1: the the attacks of government and other agencies and other
Speaker 1: and other entities. So it usually starts and this is
Speaker 1: how I happened. The cash Metell's girlfriend or whatever. The
Speaker 1: people would be given. Uh, there's a lawsuit, five million
Speaker 1: dollar lawsuit for defamation or some bullshit. And then all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, all these all these gang members have
Speaker 1: their information their data. How did that happen? It wasn't hackers.
Speaker 1: They weren't given it to go take care of problems
Speaker 1: with them. So first they get on the on the
Speaker 1: surface level, they get they're under attack by a lawsuit,
Speaker 1: and that'll just cripple them. If even if it's a
Speaker 1: bullshit lawsuit, it'll drain and and impoverish that person trying
Speaker 1: to fight it. Right, So one way or the other,
Speaker 1: they're still they're still destroying that human being. Plus they're
Speaker 1: getting given the moniker of racist or anti semitic. That'll
Speaker 1: be impossible for them to get any type of you know,
Speaker 1: once they lose everything is socially meaning they're not making
Speaker 1: money off of social media anymore because they got blacklisted
Speaker 1: or what ever. And they can't have a bank account now.
Speaker 1: Now they're not gonna be able to get a job
Speaker 1: either because of that you know, very very public defamation
Speaker 1: of them by these people. And now there's also people
Speaker 1: out in the streets who they're not gonna be able
Speaker 1: to recognize, who can get the drop on them at
Speaker 1: any time, that basically have a license to kill. And
Speaker 1: this is happening in America just and then to add
Speaker 1: this technical aspect to it, and who's given the information
Speaker 1: to who, and who's collecting it and who has you know,
Speaker 1: flot cameras everywhere. We are already in the punch bowl.
Speaker 1: That's what I've been trying to say. We're in the
Speaker 1: fish bowl of the panopticon of surveillance, and we can
Speaker 1: only distract one another no matter what we're talking about,
Speaker 1: as if something isn't actively being done to limit their
Speaker 1: ability to do this to us. And when the data
Speaker 1: centers come in they're gonna and are fully operational, there's
Speaker 1: going to be so much use sent out to all
Speaker 1: of this technological coryporatocracy nonsense of AI and flock cameras
Speaker 1: and all the other stuff. It's just going to be
Speaker 1: one behaven of surveillance. People have put up these cameras themselves.
Speaker 1: They carry two cameras on their persons at all times.
Speaker 5: They have.
Speaker 1: Let's see what screen am I on right now? Hold on? Okay, okay,
Speaker 1: And they have you know, the ring cameras or some
Speaker 1: of their company's name is Ring is just a brand
Speaker 1: name on their doorbells. All these can be accessed at
Speaker 1: any time. And if you don't think that they can be,
Speaker 1: they've proven it. They've shown it. Anybody can hack into
Speaker 1: these flock cameras too, and they've done this on purpose
Speaker 1: so that they can have you know, plausible deniability that
Speaker 1: it's not them leaking information of your whereabouts. Then matter
Speaker 1: where you go, think somebody else can report to these
Speaker 1: violent criminals who have who are already murderers, who are
Speaker 1: already working with the government or an agency in some respect,
Speaker 1: either by a confidential informant or by being gang members
Speaker 1: who are actually selling the drugs, they can send out
Speaker 1: their people to kill whomever they want to kill, and
Speaker 1: then they have absolutely it will never get back to
Speaker 1: this being you know, authorized by official quote unquote government
Speaker 1: or their agencies. This is the world that we live
Speaker 1: in right now. So if you think, oh, there's no
Speaker 1: way that what are they going to do it? No,
Speaker 1: they'll just criminalize, you know, they'll just have the criminals
Speaker 1: do it and they won't go to jail, there'll be
Speaker 1: an unsolved crime. A.
Speaker 3: Celebrite has been openly promoting its tools to Western governments
Speaker 3: for use against solemn seekers since at least twenty nineteen,
Speaker 3: So I think that's enough for you to get an
Speaker 3: idea about the type of company that Celebride is. Now,
Speaker 3: I want to talk a bit about what self write
Speaker 3: technology can do. Celebrate off as a range of products
Speaker 3: for accessing and analyzing digital data. It's best known for
Speaker 3: its Universal Forensic Extraction Device or you FED, which is
Speaker 3: the product used to access electronic devices and download their data.
Speaker 3: You FED can be used on a range of devices,
Speaker 3: including tablets, computers, USB drives, and simcards. Yeah, but it's
Speaker 3: most commonly used on mobile phones, and that's what I'm
Speaker 3: going to focus on in this video. You fed's most
Speaker 3: important feature is its ability to get into locked phones,
Speaker 3: even if they're passcode protected. Once you fed has cracked
Speaker 3: the passcode on your phone, it can start downloading the
Speaker 3: data on it. Now, what kind of data does it download? Well,
Speaker 3: the short ends is everything all of your text messages, emails, photos, videos,
Speaker 3: call logs, contacts, Google searchers, map searches, health data, everything,
Speaker 3: and when I say text messages, I'm not just talking
Speaker 3: about SMS. You've fed downloads the chats that are stored
Speaker 3: on your phone from all of your messaging apps, even
Speaker 3: the encrypted ones like WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, and three mark.
Speaker 3: And it doesn't just get the messages you've got stored
Speaker 3: on your phone, but can often also recover messages you've deleted. Importantly,
Speaker 3: ufed also downloads all of the metadata on your phone,
Speaker 3: which is the data about the data. Let's take your
Speaker 3: camera roll for example. Every phone and video on your
Speaker 3: phone contains a lot of additional info, like the data
Speaker 3: and time it was taken, whether it was taken with
Speaker 3: your phone or someone else's, and if you've got your
Speaker 3: location services turned on, which most people do, your GPS
Speaker 3: coordinates at the time it was taken. Location data is
Speaker 3: particularly important because most of your apps saved this data,
Speaker 3: and so your phone can usually show where you are
Speaker 3: at all times. One of the newer and lesser known
Speaker 3: features of you fed is its ability to download the
Speaker 3: hidden data on your phone that you can't see yourself,
Speaker 3: and you probably didn't even know was saved on your phone.
Speaker 3: For example, every iPhone that uses iOS fifteen or later
Speaker 3: stores what's called biom files, which can reveal an insane
Speaker 3: amount of info about your everyday life. There's more than
Speaker 3: one hundred and thirty categories of biome files, but some
Speaker 3: of the main ones include the histories of every app
Speaker 3: you've used at any given time, every Wi Fi network
Speaker 3: and Bluetooth device you'd connected to, every time your phone
Speaker 3: was locked and unlocked, every time you've put it in
Speaker 3: airplane mode, every notification you've received, and all of your
Speaker 3: Siri usage. Now, some of this data might seem pretty trivial,
Speaker 3: but it can actually reveal extremely important info about you
Speaker 3: and your daily activities. To illustrate the point, let's look
Speaker 3: at the recent high profile murdery trial of Karen Reid
Speaker 3: in the US. Karen Reid was accused of murdering a boyfriend,
Speaker 3: and one of the main factual issues in dispute at
Speaker 3: the trial was where her boyfriend had died. The prosecution
Speaker 3: argued that miss Reed had killed her boyfriend outside the
Speaker 3: home of one of his mates, whereas her lawyers had
Speaker 3: claimed they could have been killed inside the house. Relevantly,
Speaker 3: the death happened in the middle of winter in Massachusetts
Speaker 3: and The prosecution used evidence of the low temperature of
Speaker 3: the battery of the deceased's iPhone, which had been downloaded
Speaker 3: by you fed to support their theory that he could
Speaker 3: have been outside in the cold when he was killed.
Speaker 3: Here is Celebrit expert in with and giving evidence at
Speaker 3: the trial.
Speaker 7: Is there another subject that you looked at that you
Speaker 7: analyze in order to reach a conclusion about the time
Speaker 7: and location of John o Q's cell phone over the
Speaker 7: night of January twenty nine, twenty twenty two.
Speaker 3: Yes. The next one is battery temperature.
Speaker 7: Can you explain a little bit of background on this
Speaker 7: before you start?
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 8: Right, So again, we have a temperature sensor built in
Speaker 8: within the phone, monitoring for if the battery temperature increases
Speaker 8: too high it becomes a danger, or if the temperature
Speaker 8: gets too low and becomes an issue. So it constantly
Speaker 8: monitors the temperature of the battery and records that information
Speaker 8: in the knowledge CE data space.
Speaker 3: This same Celebrit expert gave the evidence of the trial
Speaker 3: about how iPhones also record every time they are in
Speaker 3: pocket state, which is basically when the phone's cameras are blocked,
Speaker 3: usually because it's in your pocket. The prosecution used this
Speaker 3: pocket state data in combination with the location data and
Speaker 3: battery temperature to try to show precisely where mister O'Keefe
Speaker 3: was at the time of his death. So it's pretty
Speaker 3: crazy when you think about all of the kinds of
Speaker 3: data that can be downloaded using you fed, And it's
Speaker 3: even crazier to think that this is just one of
Speaker 3: several products that Celebrate offers. Now, there's not enough time
Speaker 3: to go through all of celebrates other products in as
Speaker 3: much detail, but I just want to give you an
Speaker 3: overview of some of the main ones. You Fed Cloud
Speaker 3: is like u fed, but for your data that's stored
Speaker 3: in the cloud. This commonly includes all of your social
Speaker 3: media data, your phone backups, and your cloud storage accounts
Speaker 3: like Apple, iCloud, and Dropbox. It also includes sensitive data
Speaker 3: that's some app store on the cloud instead of on
Speaker 3: your phone, like all of your Uber activity and your
Speaker 3: online purchases. Celebrate Endpoint Inspector is a product that allows
Speaker 3: the remote collection of data from phones, computers, and other devices.
Speaker 3: This is important because, unlike you fed, which requires the
Speaker 3: target's device to be connected to the physical you Fed,
Speaker 3: Endpoint Inspector can extract the data from the device, even
Speaker 3: if it's on the other side of the world. The
Speaker 3: product is marketed to corporations to monitor their employees' activities
Speaker 3: at the office or when they're working from home, but
Speaker 3: who knows where the government agencies are also using this
Speaker 3: remote extraction technology. Celebrate Pathfinder is a product that takes
Speaker 3: all of the data that is downloaded using other Celebrate
Speaker 3: products and then uses AI to analyze it in a
Speaker 3: fraction of the time that it would take humans to do.
Speaker 3: For example, in a matter of minutes. It scours all
Speaker 3: of your photos, videos, texts, and social media to reveal
Speaker 3: your interactions with certain people, your movements, and your activities.
Speaker 1: Just because you're a paranoid don't mean they're not after you.
Speaker 3: So that's an overview of the main products that Celebrate
Speaker 3: currently offers, but it's important to remember that the hacking
Speaker 3: capabilities of this company are constantly evolving. Celebrate invests very
Speaker 3: heavily in research and develop which can be spearheaded by
Speaker 3: the ongoing recruitment of the best and brightest of elite
Speaker 3: Israeli intelligence units like eighty two hundred. In addition, the
Speaker 3: company acquires other cyber security companies so that it can
Speaker 3: take their IP and use it to expand celebrate surveillance capacity.
Speaker 3: A very recent example of this this celebrates two hundred
Speaker 3: million dollar purchase of the US startup Corellium, which specializes
Speaker 3: in hacking phones via different.
Speaker 1: Means hard someone other than that is no.
Speaker 3: Stranger to controversy itself, having reportedly offered its product to
Speaker 3: companies with appalling human rights records, such as the Israeli
Speaker 3: co Operation NSO group, which is responsible for the infamous
Speaker 3: Pegasus spyware.
Speaker 1: Right, really, let me give you that this is just
Speaker 1: the click overview, But where does Pegasus? And there's really
Speaker 1: technology for him that sells sophisticated spyware such as Pegasus
Speaker 1: to governments. That's the EDS group purpose. Its software can
Speaker 1: access and control it. It targets target. You're the target
Speaker 1: smartphone including its microphone and camera. So here's the thing.
Speaker 1: You know, it's funny. Let's say I'm going to the
Speaker 1: zoo today, and I'm or I plan to go to
Speaker 1: the zoo. It doesn't matter if I'm nowhere within ear
Speaker 1: shot of my phone, you know, microphone shot of my phone.
Speaker 8: Or.
Speaker 1: Near a camera that I'm aware of. If I'm telling
Speaker 1: somebody near their phone, they know where I'm going. Before
Speaker 1: I go, they know when I've decided to go, they
Speaker 1: know the plans I'm making, they know where I'm going
Speaker 1: to be at all times with my family. That's like
Speaker 1: a multiplier because just because you may be wise enough
Speaker 1: to keep your surveillance device away from you, doesn't mean
Speaker 1: that that's gonna Yeah, that's not that's not the biggest uh.
Speaker 1: I mean, even if somebody has a fitbit watch on
Speaker 1: their hands and one of those one of those you know,
Speaker 1: iPhone watches whatever they call those Apple watches, do you
Speaker 1: never know? If there's so many things to consider, there's
Speaker 1: the surveillance cameras that are sometimes even in your house, right,
Speaker 1: do you use those for a quote unquote security? Do
Speaker 1: you not think that those can be hacked? Do you
Speaker 1: not think that they're made so that they're hackable on purpose?
Speaker 1: Do you not think that maybe they are made so
Speaker 1: that they have to be so that you have no
Speaker 1: you have no choice in the matter, Like if you're
Speaker 1: going to design when it has to be accessible by
Speaker 1: quote unquote law enforcement, who then sends it off to
Speaker 1: whomever they decide to send it off to, including any
Speaker 1: little scumbag confidential informant. They decide to oh, yeah, he's
Speaker 1: becoming a nuisance. Here's the layout of his home dot
Speaker 1: dot dot. It'll be on Solved Crime. They don't even
Speaker 1: have to nonckradio. They don't even have to have a
Speaker 1: red flag law excuse. They can just send inals to
Speaker 1: do it. This is this is what I'm talking about, man, Like,
Speaker 1: this is where we're at. And the fact that people
Speaker 1: know where you're going and they know where you are
Speaker 1: means they have a pretty good idea of what route
Speaker 1: you're taking to So somebone can run you off the
Speaker 1: road in the process if they choose to go with
Speaker 1: that route that was kind of a pun right route. Yeah,
Speaker 1: any number of things. There could be a fake, fake checkpoint,
Speaker 1: a fake you know, an a divergence, somebody who it
Speaker 1: looks like they're on the road but they're broken down,
Speaker 1: and because they know through processing your data and your history,
Speaker 1: that you're a good person that you would want to
Speaker 1: try to help, so you pull over and then you
Speaker 1: get killed or they take some one of your loved
Speaker 1: ones and you never see them again. This is the
Speaker 1: level that we're at right now. Everything can be done
Speaker 1: under the under the surface, right under the so you
Speaker 1: they don't have to be wearing a badge or a
Speaker 1: uniform or a blue helmet and be doing exactly what
Speaker 1: they would be doing if they were wearing those things
Speaker 1: in a scenario where they're after the people, the American people,
Speaker 1: to suppress them, which is exactly what is happening right now,
Speaker 1: and I'm showing you how they do it. In tech,
Speaker 1: smart city surveillance, technology, balancing innovation, using City of Phoenix,
Speaker 1: using smart cameras to make their streets safer. It's always
Speaker 1: about safety them, their safety, the criminals who know that
Speaker 1: if you realize what they're up to, they would be
Speaker 1: in danger. It's for their safety they want to kill you.
Speaker 1: Smart city s veilance, Signapore's camera systems, you know, State scoop.
Speaker 1: These are all just everywhere, and they're not isolated to
Speaker 1: one place just because they talk about and this is
Speaker 1: another joke that they do, is they'll talk about someplace
Speaker 1: far far away that most people aren't at that are
Speaker 1: watching the video or reading the article, and you assume
Speaker 1: that they're just over there, but then you realize it's
Speaker 1: the same corporation that's doing it there, that's doing adults where,
Speaker 1: but they only are they're only focusing on the places
Speaker 1: that are farther away, and you're like, oh yeah, well
Speaker 1: those countries are all screwed up, so that makes sense.
Speaker 1: You know, those are the places I would ever want
Speaker 1: to visit anyway, is really spyware makers? NSO gets new
Speaker 1: owners six days ago? Well that was six days ago
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty. Well, let's say I don't know. Let's
Speaker 1: say under is really surveillance living in a dystopian and Palestine.
Speaker 1: That's NSO. Smart city surveillance made simple compact cameras for
Speaker 1: smart city applications. Smart cities keep saying smart city over
Speaker 1: and over again. Right, Apparently you as a smart city
Speaker 1: supporting smart city. I can see that. I can see
Speaker 1: the street lights. They're they're the li fi, you know,
Speaker 1: data collecting freaking purplish hue colored lights with the LEDs
Speaker 1: that screwed up people's sleep patterns too. I haven't been
Speaker 1: able to sleep at night for a long time. But
Speaker 1: I think there's more to it than that, supporting smart
Speaker 1: city objectives with a single surveillance system. But I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just one a little quick thing, right. What
Speaker 1: they are a network of cameras used by municipalities for
Speaker 1: public safety. Every time you hear this, it's for safety.
Speaker 1: That means that they want you dead. That's just all
Speaker 1: just let's cut to the chase and let's stop being bullshitters.
Speaker 1: They tell tho, the soccer moms and the and the
Speaker 1: people that they've enabled through allowing them, you know, suffrage
Speaker 1: to allow these things into their communities, because they don't
Speaker 1: realize that the enemy is the one talking about their safety.
Speaker 1: The very people who want them dead or suppressed and
Speaker 1: beate into submission are telling them that they care about
Speaker 1: their health and well being in safety you will, really,
Speaker 1: is that why they are still continually pushing a murderous
Speaker 1: concoction of poison to inject into your children? Is that
Speaker 1: because they care about you? Because they're just misguided into
Speaker 1: what health is. No, they're not misguided. This is a
Speaker 1: they're all delivered acts. Sulfur can access and control target smellphone,
Speaker 1: including its microphone and camera. Controversy and a SOB group
Speaker 1: has been accused of providing spyware that is used to
Speaker 1: violate human rights by targeting journalists, activists, and political leaders,
Speaker 1: or people online who happen to have an opinion that
Speaker 1: gets too popular because they have a following and some
Speaker 1: of these people are are decoys to be made a
Speaker 1: fake example of so that it scares other people from talking.
Speaker 1: There's that element mixed in, so there's a there's a
Speaker 1: delegitimizing aspect to everything because that's how they keep balance,
Speaker 1: and that person will just get laundered a bunch of
Speaker 1: money and a gifts and go or a gofund me
Speaker 1: and it's just another way to rob the stupid people
Speaker 1: who have empathy and compassion and care. And then again
Speaker 1: it's all so a higher influencer status, influencer being a
Speaker 1: stupid word, but basically siphoning wealth from people who don't
Speaker 1: have as much as they have already, and you're they're
Speaker 1: making them more poor. And meanwhile, the people who are
Speaker 1: who are real, who are sincere and honest, who are
Speaker 1: developing and giving out information, and that those people still
Speaker 1: live in obscurity because the the oive algorithm, which is
Speaker 1: just hey, they're not one of us, don't let them
Speaker 1: be seen, are still in the dark and nobody knows
Speaker 1: who they are. There's some good channels every once in a
Speaker 1: while I find out there that are very very tiny
Speaker 1: and they have good information. What they are a network
Speaker 1: of cameras yeah, yeah, smart City cameras. So this is
Speaker 1: just this is just one little part of the NS groups,
Speaker 1: the NS group to the Pegasus. Right, So let's see
Speaker 1: if I have Pega up here, Shadow Dragon Social Net.
Speaker 1: Yeah no, so I didn't have this one, but we
Speaker 1: went over there before. I gotta find the guy again there.
Speaker 7: Y Are.
Speaker 3: Was used by repressive raisings around the world against journalists
Speaker 3: and human rights activists. It's worth mentioning that like Celebrits
Speaker 3: Group recruitals.
Speaker 1: So isn't this horrible how they've done the aversion too,
Speaker 1: Because remember I told you the l seeing I or
Speaker 1: the eye of Horus. That was they used to be
Speaker 1: a good symbol. It was a sun's symbol and the
Speaker 1: sun's rays and the eye, the eye and the sky.
Speaker 1: But it meant the protector, the guardian, those that class
Speaker 1: of rulers who made it their duty to maintain justice's
Speaker 1: and and protect their territory, their kingdom whatever, from hostile
Speaker 1: forces outside and vaders. Meaning if you saw a symbol
Speaker 1: of that like that, it was supposed to give you relief,
Speaker 1: to remind you that there's people looking out for your safety,
Speaker 1: for your health, for your well being. Right, that will
Speaker 1: intervene if you're being you know, terrorized, and they'll settle
Speaker 1: disputes justly. That's what the Goths had instituted with their
Speaker 1: son Colt, and that's that was there, that was their
Speaker 1: symbol and the ie the sun, et cetera being turned
Speaker 1: into an eye that's always watching you for malicious purposes,
Speaker 1: big brother, who's making sure that you're behaving, rather than
Speaker 1: he's watching over the land to ensure that there won't
Speaker 1: be any hostile invasions and brutal you know, butchering of villages.
Speaker 1: Big difference there. One is there to give you confidence
Speaker 1: in your leadership, in the rulers who are protecting and
Speaker 1: making your life better. The other is a prison guard.
Speaker 3: Exclusively from Israeli intelligence units, including eighty two hundred for
Speaker 3: its research team. Okay, so now it's time to talk
Speaker 3: about the really problematic ways that celebrate technology is used
Speaker 3: in Australia. Before I get into the detail, I just
Speaker 3: want to explain and the basic principle that the government
Speaker 3: at least usually pays lip service to and making laws
Speaker 3: that infringe upon our privacy. It's long been recognized that
Speaker 3: there is this tension between on the one hand, the
Speaker 3: public interest and the police being able to have the
Speaker 3: tools they need to fight crime, and on the other hand,
Speaker 3: the interests of people in having their privacy and civil
Speaker 3: liberties protected. Lawmakers claim that they try to strike the
Speaker 3: right balance between these two competing interests, and the way
Speaker 3: that they normally do this is by strictly regulating the
Speaker 3: use of powers that undermine our privacy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but it's it's like a criminal self regulating. They're
Speaker 1: not going to tell you when they're violating you or
Speaker 1: breaking a law. You have to go find that out
Speaker 1: yourself through the minutia and the red tape and all
Speaker 1: the distractions and dead ends that they're going to put
Speaker 1: in front of you. The twisty turns that it's going
Speaker 1: to be impossible for you to discover unless you're on
Speaker 1: the inside. And then you realize, oh yeah, and then
Speaker 1: the plausible dietiability that was someone else or something got
Speaker 1: leaked or hacked, right, certainly, wasn't the government just deliberately
Speaker 1: doing that? And that was a full intent and purpose
Speaker 1: in the first place, was to give your data and
Speaker 1: your information a way to someone else so that they
Speaker 1: could be blamed rather than them, so they can continue
Speaker 1: the system without the people revolting against it as long
Speaker 1: as it looks like somebody else is doing something to somebody. Wow,
Speaker 1: isn't that convenient that these people just get mugged and
Speaker 1: murdered that have some sort of dispute or have been
Speaker 1: you know, put you know, named in a lawsuit or
Speaker 1: something involving the FBI or the government or something else,
Speaker 1: or some other person who's claiming defamation or or anti
Speaker 1: semitism or something like that. Isn't the funny how they
Speaker 1: came up getting bugged and guild that's that's that's odd.
Speaker 3: And by creating mechanisms for external ove aside and review
Speaker 3: of these powers. So let's take phone tapping as an example.
Speaker 3: Intercepting someone's phone calls without them knowing is obviously a
Speaker 3: highly invasive form ofs of violence, and it's for this
Speaker 3: reason that it's highly regulated.
Speaker 1: For example, Yeah, but who determines that that's okay anytime?
Speaker 1: And what is it?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: Well they, I mean, you can fabricate any reasoning that
Speaker 1: you want. That's why it's so funny, Like me like, oh,
Speaker 1: they need they need to have this or that in
Speaker 1: the in the court in order for them to get
Speaker 1: a warrant. So if they have the warrant, then they
Speaker 1: must be justified. There must actually be something there. Are
Speaker 1: you crazy? Do you know what the courts are? And
Speaker 1: they're going that's if they even go through that formality
Speaker 1: they go. You know, if someone says that they they
Speaker 1: wanted they want you to stay out of their their
Speaker 1: their place of business or whatever, they have to they
Speaker 1: have to fill something out. It has to be submitted
Speaker 1: to you in writing, stating this so that you know
Speaker 1: that it's legitimate and not just by verbal. But this
Speaker 1: is how, this is how the freaking police work. They'll
Speaker 1: call you from a private number and you're supposed to
Speaker 1: assume that these are who they say they are, and
Speaker 1: then they'll tell you over the phone that you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to go back to a certain place because they
Speaker 1: don't want you there anymore. And you're supposed to what,
Speaker 1: especially when they're holding something like my cat, my my
Speaker 1: daughter's cat, not show up anyway? Who the fuck are you? You
Speaker 1: didn't that wasn't official, That wasn't that wasn't putting me
Speaker 1: unoiced or giving me some sort of paperwork that that
Speaker 1: said that I would be trespassing, that that none of
Speaker 1: the official channels were gone had gone through, but they
Speaker 1: were going to try to arrest me for trespassing when
Speaker 1: I was saving my cat for my daughter that they
Speaker 1: had abducted from our yard, and then pulled this collar
Speaker 1: off and said he didn't have one. This is how
Speaker 1: fucked up this world is, man, And then they're gonna
Speaker 1: tell me, And I was like, like, were you parked
Speaker 1: on the other side of the place before. I'm like,
Speaker 1: it doesn't fucking matter where I am. You didn't. Everything
Speaker 1: that you did in this in this process was completely
Speaker 1: illegitimate and not by the rule of law, so you
Speaker 1: can't enforce any of this bullshit on me anyway. And
Speaker 1: I'm sitting in the fucking car, Rebecca's in there. What
Speaker 1: are you trying to fuck with me for? And who
Speaker 1: is the cunt that came outside and called this in
Speaker 1: in the first place, The same cunt that freaking stole
Speaker 1: our car, our cat in the first place and then
Speaker 1: decided to foster it at or her own house. And
Speaker 1: they lied to me and lied to me and lied
Speaker 1: to me that they didn't do it and they didn't
Speaker 1: have the cat because he wasn't there. I'm like, you
Speaker 1: have it, you have it, And they finally admitted to
Speaker 1: it though, but it's not here. What do you mean
Speaker 1: it's not here? But the hell you mean it's not here?
Speaker 1: And then they charge me like two hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: dollars to get the cap back because like, well, he
Speaker 1: needs his shots. Oh so now you're gonna determine what
Speaker 1: kind of poisons you have to give him before you
Speaker 1: can give him back to me. And we can't let
Speaker 1: release him unless you schedule a time to have him needtered.
Speaker 1: Who the fuck are you people? This is the Humane Society.
Speaker 1: Do not give them a penny instead of walking for them,
Speaker 1: throw a rock through their fucking window. I'm just kidding.
Speaker 1: That was just a joke, just a suggestion.
Speaker 3: Only a handful of agencies are allowed to do it.
Speaker 3: They generally need a.
Speaker 1: Warr and Peter and the Humane Society are inversely inversely named.
Speaker 1: They do more euthanasias than any other two groups.
Speaker 3: First, and they can only get a warrant in fairly
Speaker 3: limited circumstances. On top of that, each year the Federal
Speaker 3: Attorney General publishes a Report about Telephone Interception, which sets
Speaker 3: out info about the extended phone tapping in Australia and
Speaker 3: how effective it's been. This kind of accountability is vital
Speaker 3: because it's the only way to know if these powers
Speaker 3: are being abused and if they're actually getting results. So
Speaker 3: with that principle in mind, let's get back to celebrate.
Speaker 3: It's difficult to think of anything more invasive than the
Speaker 3: downloading of your mobile phone. I mean, after all, your
Speaker 3: phone is usually where the most sensitive info about you
Speaker 3: and your private life is stored. Celebrate.
Speaker 1: But just to go back to my example, think about this.
Speaker 1: This was a cat this time, but this is how
Speaker 1: the system works, from the police and the courts all
Speaker 1: the way through. The main society is considered an organization
Speaker 1: that can be tied directly to some sort of public service.
Speaker 1: Therefore kind of municipal corporation. Right, so the municipality has
Speaker 1: an incentive to protect their own. Somebody steals, ducts one
Speaker 1: of your children instead of a cat, holds it out
Speaker 1: of building that you know that they're at. You go
Speaker 1: there and you try to negotiate getting your loved one back,
Speaker 1: and they utilize the force of we call it illegitimate
Speaker 1: law enforcement, illegitimate authority when you leave, so that you
Speaker 1: can't come back. So now they're going to utilize so
Speaker 1: again they're they're the kidnappers. The kidnappers are now being
Speaker 1: protected by law enforcement, and they're gonna put you in jail.
Speaker 1: This is how CPS operates. This is our world that
Speaker 1: we live in, right fucking now.
Speaker 3: Our products can get all of that info and more.
Speaker 3: And so you think that they use in Australia would
Speaker 3: be subject to the most stringent restrictions an oversight, right, Well,
Speaker 3: that's not the case at all. In fact, the way
Speaker 3: that celibar products are used in this country raises some
Speaker 3: serious concerns for our privacy and civil liberties. And that's
Speaker 3: what I'm going to explore now. For starters, Celebrate products
Speaker 3: are used by wide range of government agencies, and not
Speaker 3: just law enforcement. At the federal level, there have been
Speaker 3: one hundred and seventy one contracts between Celebrate and various
Speaker 3: government agencies since twenty eleven. These agencies have included the AFP,
Speaker 3: the Department of Defense, the Department of Home Affairs, ASSEIC,
Speaker 3: the ATO, and more. One of the more controversial contracts
Speaker 3: is that.
Speaker 1: Was did you see the one that's the ATO is
Speaker 1: the tax Organization? So they're going to utilize So again,
Speaker 1: why do you even have to file? Is it to
Speaker 1: see if you're going to be honest or truthful or not,
Speaker 1: or maybe you just make a mistake or you forget something,
Speaker 1: and then they're going to criminalize that penalize that There
Speaker 1: is no possible way to be one hundred percent sure
Speaker 1: that there isn't some fucked up verbiage in the tax
Speaker 1: code that could just be utilized if they decided that
Speaker 1: they don't like you to make you guilty of something
Speaker 1: that you're not actually guilty of at all, because you're voluntary.
Speaker 1: It's a voluntary thing in the first place, for federal taxes.
Speaker 1: And remember they're siphoning out your wealth to pay for
Speaker 1: mass murderers and your own and your own death. So
Speaker 1: maybe at some point you decided that you don't want
Speaker 1: to pay for your own death anymore. And for the
Speaker 1: you know, bolstering up the uh, the infrastructure, and the
Speaker 1: when I say infrastructure, I mean the agencies that go
Speaker 1: around stealing other people's children and harassing them and pulling
Speaker 1: them over and finding them and extorting money from them
Speaker 1: and shaking them down. Maybe you don't want to pay
Speaker 1: for that anymore. Maybe you realize that this is an
Speaker 1: evil system that is also enforcing dangerous medical procedures on
Speaker 1: people and had locked down and destroyed businesses and had
Speaker 1: no end and of their to their tyranny and justified
Speaker 1: it with a fraud lie of a virus that doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: Viruses don't that's not how it works, and that they
Speaker 1: pushed a poison based on one lie, they gave you
Speaker 1: another lie. Maybe you don't want to maybe you don't
Speaker 1: want to give them anything anymore. We got to figure
Speaker 1: out how to reclaim ourselves, Like I have done this before,
Speaker 1: but it was only to a hospital when I had
Speaker 1: a claim that I'm a human, natural, living being and
Speaker 1: not a piece of property of the day or of
Speaker 1: the of the of the hospital, which basically is what
Speaker 1: you do. When you sign in for the paperwork, you're
Speaker 1: basically signing over and saying that they own you. You
Speaker 1: don't want to do that. You definitely want to make
Speaker 1: it very clear that your children are your property so
Speaker 1: that they're not claiming those Ers.
Speaker 3: Services Australia, which allows Centelin to use Celebrate technology and
Speaker 3: investigations of people suspected of making force claims for social security.
Speaker 3: Another controversial contract is that with the Sports Integrity Unit
Speaker 3: formerly known as the Australian Sports Anti Doping Authority, which
Speaker 3: is used Celebrate technology to investigate the use by athletes
Speaker 3: of the performance enhancing drugs. Now, it's important to one.
Speaker 1: Of gay you use them as long as you don't
Speaker 1: test positive during the actual event, Like, aren't you able
Speaker 1: to train and prepare utilizing Yeah, I mean you should
Speaker 1: be able to. I don't see why you wouldn't be
Speaker 1: able to. I mean, if you're taking that chance on
Speaker 1: your own health, as long as you're clean by the
Speaker 1: time of the event, and I'll see why they would
Speaker 1: be a bad thing.
Speaker 3: Standard. These are just the federal agencies that have contracts
Speaker 3: with celebrit and not all of the agencies who use
Speaker 3: Celebrate technology. For example, in twenty twenty three, services strily
Speaker 3: are admitted that it shared celebrates fun hacking technology with this.
Speaker 1: So remember this too. None of this, well, a vast
Speaker 1: majority of this, besides the cameras outside of your control.
Speaker 1: None of this would have been impossible if they didn't
Speaker 1: first make us completely dependent or normalized to this device
Speaker 1: and that we carried around all the time. Most people
Speaker 1: don't even call anybody on this thing. This calling it
Speaker 1: a phone is almost a misnomer at this point. I
Speaker 1: mean calling it a tracking device, but what entices you.
Speaker 1: It's like a computer, right, it's a pocket computer. You
Speaker 1: get to play around on the internet and entertain yourself
Speaker 1: and distract yourself and maybe do some business on it,
Speaker 1: and you know, monitor things look around on it. But
Speaker 1: it's basically all distraction, right. But while you're staring at
Speaker 1: it and giving it all these types of faces, pictures
Speaker 1: of your face, and while you're doing this, taking pictures
Speaker 1: of him, all your surroundings of other people that they're
Speaker 1: also utilizing. A lot of this stuff would have been
Speaker 1: it would not have been possible if we still had
Speaker 1: goddamn flip phones without any screen, without any cameras, with
Speaker 1: little push buttons on them, you know what they would
Speaker 1: call like a Nextel type phone, except don't use next though,
Speaker 1: grabbing those and just using them for actual phone calls,
Speaker 1: Like I can't even believe that pager thing bomb works,
Speaker 1: Like who the hell still carries a pager.
Speaker 3: Apartment of Education as well as other unnamed agencies. We
Speaker 3: don't know which other agencies are using Celebrate products, and
Speaker 3: that's part of the problem. The same problem exists at
Speaker 3: the state and territory level, or even less is known
Speaker 3: about the use of celebrate technology.
Speaker 1: We know that again this is just one company of many.
Speaker 3: Right as contracts, but at least some state police forces
Speaker 3: as well as other investigative bodies like the new Southwest
Speaker 3: Independent Commission again corruption. But we don't know whether any
Speaker 3: of these state agencies are sharing Celebrite technology with other
Speaker 3: state agencies and in what circumstances. Something interesting I learned
Speaker 3: when I was doing it.
Speaker 1: Doesn't it bother anybody that all these wonderful, beautiful places
Speaker 1: that were built, and when I say built, I just
Speaker 1: managed automatically default to Europeans building things, designing them, being
Speaker 1: the architects and doing great things, and they're in beautiful
Speaker 1: territories with lots of resources, lots of wildlife, water scenery.
Speaker 1: Doesn't it suck that so many of these beautiful places
Speaker 1: are uninhabitable and you wouldn't even want to go visit
Speaker 1: there anymore, and they're doing that on purpose. But it's
Speaker 1: turned us so against travel and tourism or contemplating ever
Speaker 1: moving out of the place that we know. It's like
Speaker 1: the W know versus W You don't. I don't know
Speaker 1: anybody who would elect to be an Australian right now.
Speaker 1: I don't know anybody who'd elect to be a New
Speaker 1: Zealander right now. I don't know anybody who'd elect to
Speaker 1: be a lot of things, and right now it'd be
Speaker 1: it's it's a it's a damn shame that Russia doesn't
Speaker 1: have other territories that are tropical, because I like a
Speaker 1: certain I like a certain temperature. You know, It's just
Speaker 1: it sucks. You can't even conempblately like, oh, I'll go
Speaker 1: to Japan. No, I don't. Oh I want to go
Speaker 1: to I'd like to go to Australia Sometimes I really don't, though,
Speaker 1: what about these islands and off New Zealand. I'm good.
Speaker 1: I'm good because I don't want all the baggage that
Speaker 1: goes with it. I don't want all the travel bullshit
Speaker 1: that goes with it. I don't want all the surveillance
Speaker 1: and spying and renting the scans and all the way
Speaker 1: whatever the hell else they're putting in place, Like, I
Speaker 1: don't want to be. I don't want to subject myself
Speaker 1: to all that. So what's the what's the alternative? Well,
Speaker 1: you make millions of dollars and you get your own yacht,
Speaker 1: and you've traveled the ocean. Until someone decides to torpedo
Speaker 1: you a in a freaking destroyer. I guess, I guess
Speaker 1: that's what you do. You hit a ride in Zuckerberg's
Speaker 1: forty five million dollar boat and a plot to throw
Speaker 1: him over. I guess. I'm sure that I'm sure that
Speaker 1: place is loaded with enough automatic weapons and I'm sure
Speaker 1: there's I'm sure that thing's heavily fortified, or at least
Speaker 1: they have a a an arsenal under a sealed lock
Speaker 1: door in that boat for his his his detachment of security.
Speaker 1: So what do we do? You know, It's like one
Speaker 1: of the main things that has crippled our company since
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one is are huge, huge. We had so
Speaker 1: many people from Australia that loved our hot sauce, that
Speaker 1: loved our spicy honey, and they stopped coming to San
Speaker 1: Diego because of the restrictions at home and because of
Speaker 1: California be in a mess. And this was the case
Speaker 1: for a lot of different places, but Australia was one
Speaker 1: of our hugest like hubs of people that would get
Speaker 1: our sauce on vacation, tons of people, and then it
Speaker 1: just completely turned into zero. And then with the vat
Speaker 1: tax and all these other stupid things and making shipping
Speaker 1: ridiculous to the point where it costs more than the
Speaker 1: items that you're buying. Europe all together, any EU country.
Speaker 1: That's a lot of places. They used to be supportive
Speaker 1: of us on our website, so was Australia. But there's
Speaker 1: a twenty I don't know if it's more now twenty
Speaker 1: percent vat tax, So it's not based on the actual
Speaker 1: product that you buy. They're taxing you on the fucking
Speaker 1: shipping and handling too, So it's like doubled that. So
Speaker 1: if fifty dollars was how much the product was and
Speaker 1: fifty five dollars was the shipping, they want twenty percent
Speaker 1: of one hundred and five before you can even pick
Speaker 1: it up from the post office. Who the hell is
Speaker 1: going to buy things anymore when it's just more than
Speaker 1: doubled their cost plus twenty percent, all because of all
Speaker 1: the bullshit in between, and they're not traveling anymore, and
Speaker 1: disposal income is shrinking down like crazy. Most people aren't
Speaker 1: doing a lot of traveling because of that too. People
Speaker 1: who used to travel are holding tight on their money now.
Speaker 1: There is no there is no sense in the human
Speaker 1: psyche or their consciousness of a bright future, of a
Speaker 1: better tomorrow. They don't feel confident in spending money. They
Speaker 1: are more holding onto things right. And I think there's
Speaker 1: another health scare coming, I really do. And I think
Speaker 1: that the sooner people get aware of true health, the
Speaker 1: better they are going to be because they won't be
Speaker 1: sucked up with this lie. They won't do things. They
Speaker 1: won't go through the stupid hoops, they won't play the
Speaker 1: stupid reindeer games, they won't through the little pantomime that
Speaker 1: they are going to be told that they have to do,
Speaker 1: because they'll know that's ridiculous and that it's not how
Speaker 1: things work. And if they have older nutrition and nutrients
Speaker 1: that they need, unless they're being directly poisoned, they're going
Speaker 1: to be all right. And you know, that is what
Speaker 1: it is. That's why we do our Wednesdays with doctor Glynnen.
Speaker 1: That's why we have the stuff on my website for
Speaker 1: the Azure Well, because that does keep you well above
Speaker 1: everybody else. And once you're aware of that, understand it.
Speaker 1: You know, you realize that you've hit It's like you've
Speaker 1: you've found Everland or whatever. I don't know how to
Speaker 1: describe it. You know that you've come out of the
Speaker 1: medical matrix, the suppression, and you're living a better life
Speaker 1: that doesn't involve being dependent on mds with a cult
Speaker 1: philosophy that they don't even realize kills people because they're
Speaker 1: that indoctrinated into it that they don't recognize that drugs
Speaker 1: are never the answer because that's what they prescribe, because
Speaker 1: that's how they make them money. They're drug dealers. Not
Speaker 1: all those drugs make you feel happy, but all of
Speaker 1: them definitely bring it closer to death.
Speaker 3: Search for this story is that the Australian government is
Speaker 3: not only a client of Celebride, but it also pushes
Speaker 3: Celebrite onto other countries. People familiar with the geopolitics of
Speaker 3: this region might know that the Australian government wields a
Speaker 3: lot of influence over some of our smaller neighbors, and
Speaker 3: one of the way that this manifests is with policing.
Speaker 3: The Australian Federal Police has a big say in how
Speaker 3: the police forces of our neighboring countries operate, and in
Speaker 3: the last few years, the Australian government has provided Celebrit
Speaker 3: products to police forces in countries including Vanuatu, Papua New
Speaker 3: Guinea and possibly the Solomon.
Speaker 1: Islands Papua New Guinea. Like, who the hell's there? I
Speaker 1: thought there were still cannibals. Really, Man, guaranteed all these
Speaker 1: people are OIV controlled Ori fucking v You had all
Speaker 1: those people in the you know, who was that guy?
Speaker 1: The who is the name of that that are disease
Speaker 1: that they were talking about? Ah at last, Man, I
Speaker 1: asked it. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 3: The AFP also provides Celebrate training to these and other
Speaker 3: Pacific nations. Okay, so now that you know some of
Speaker 3: the agencies using Celebrate technology, let's talk about the way
Speaker 3: they're using it. For me, this is one of the
Speaker 3: most important aspects of the story, yet it's something that
Speaker 3: most people don't know about. Why is it so important
Speaker 3: because there are very few, if any, known restrictions on
Speaker 3: the use of Celebrate tools by these agencies, and this
Speaker 3: has resulted in mobile phones being hacked on a large
Speaker 3: scale in this country. To illustrate the point, I'm going
Speaker 3: to focus on the New South Wales Police Force because
Speaker 3: that's the agency that I deal with most as a
Speaker 3: criminal lawyer based in Sydney. Fuck in New South Wales,
Speaker 3: none of the restrictions that apply to other police powers
Speaker 3: to protect people's privacy and civil liberties apply to the
Speaker 3: use of celebrate technology. For instance, the cops generally need
Speaker 3: a warrant if they want to do things like search
Speaker 3: your home, tap your phone, or install a listening device.
Speaker 1: Kuru. Yeah, those guys, the child reapists that were out
Speaker 1: there in Papua New Guinea and the ones that came
Speaker 1: up with the bullshit idea of the slow virus. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they were Jewish child molester's surprise. Surprise, is anybody else surprised?
Speaker 1: The Kuru Guru is the name of the video that
Speaker 1: I shared with you a while back, and that was
Speaker 1: guy goshk who I'm talking about, who went on to
Speaker 1: exclaim how he loves little boys and they've always jumped
Speaker 1: into his bed. He never forced anyone they wanted to,
Speaker 1: you know, And then he got graphic about things and
Speaker 1: lips and certain things wrapped around. Yeah, so he's a sick,
Speaker 1: sick fuck. And that's that's where you get a lot
Speaker 1: of your HIV eagles AIDS type of bullshit from. Is
Speaker 1: that guy who was raping children in Papua New Guinea?
Speaker 3: Yeah, by Senior Ka to secretly record the conversations you
Speaker 3: have with people. To get these warrants, the cops need
Speaker 3: to go to an indie and authority locking judge, your
Speaker 3: magistrate and presents some evidence justifying the warrant being issued.
Speaker 3: What this evidence needs to prove depends on the warrant
Speaker 3: being requested.
Speaker 1: But again, this is based on their rules, and nobody's
Speaker 1: watching them to see that they carry out these rules,
Speaker 1: that they hold themselves to their own standard. This is
Speaker 1: this is where this is true, that this is in place,
Speaker 1: but that doesn't mean that it's followed. They can override this,
Speaker 1: ignore it completely, or falsify that they did it. If
Speaker 1: they want to surveil somebody, if they want to bring
Speaker 1: someone down, if they want to do whatever they want
Speaker 1: to do, or if they want to do it to
Speaker 1: a whole territory, they're going to do it. They're not
Speaker 1: gonna be like, oh no, our own you know no,
Speaker 1: because they're already a criminal organization. Government is criminal is
Speaker 1: a criminal organization. It has become that because of the
Speaker 1: Saturn Jewish banking cult in control of all cories that
Speaker 1: I've destroyed it and they've used our military to destroy it,
Speaker 1: and in times past they used European militaries to destroy
Speaker 1: other countries and territories and set up they're banking dominance
Speaker 1: over them. It's the expansion of the pair site. It's
Speaker 1: the rash that keeps on spreading. And like I said
Speaker 1: back in the other episode about Jesus came if he
Speaker 1: was a guy and if it was a thing, If
Speaker 1: then he showed up in the place where the intervention
Speaker 1: needed to occur. He gave him the last chance to ultimatum,
Speaker 1: tried to show them, try to tell them. He didn't
Speaker 1: go to other Europeans and say, hey, listen, you guys
Speaker 1: really need to fix your shit. No, because we already
Speaker 1: got it. We are just a benevolent creator, that same
Speaker 1: guy he was talking about, And so he went to
Speaker 1: them with the proposal. They murdered him, torture to murder him.
Speaker 1: If the story is true, and that meant okay, well,
Speaker 1: they denied the offer, and the rest of God's people,
Speaker 1: those who believe in the beneluc creator were supposed to
Speaker 1: have picked up the torch at that point and fix
Speaker 1: the problem. The problem being they've already had their last chance,
Speaker 1: They already were given their last opportunity, and they not
Speaker 1: just threw it in the face of the of the messenger.
Speaker 1: They murdered him. So that was our signal. That was
Speaker 1: our q to obliterate the Sanhedron and everything that it
Speaker 1: stood for and everything else that was associated with it,
Speaker 1: to get rid of this Saturn cult off the face
Speaker 1: of the planet. And we haven't done that, and now
Speaker 1: they are going to make it so that we can't
Speaker 1: even live on this planet that they've overtaken. They're black
Speaker 1: stone or black rock is a black cube, and we're
Speaker 1: all inside of it, all neatly packaged in our own
Speaker 1: little prison cage of deception and illusion, our panopticon that
Speaker 1: they can shake like they shake those little baskets with
Speaker 1: the with the two praying mantis in them, so that
Speaker 1: they fight each other and kill each other. They agitate
Speaker 1: them by shaking the box, setting it down. The gamble,
Speaker 1: the gamble on who's gonna win is the Chinese people?
Speaker 1: Do that? You want to be part of that or
Speaker 1: you want to step outside the box, thinking outside the cube.
Speaker 3: Why is the cops to show they've got a good
Speaker 3: reason for the request. For example, if the cops are
Speaker 3: applying for a warrant to search your house, they need
Speaker 3: to demonstrate that they've got raisonable grounds to believe that
Speaker 3: they'll find the evidence they're looking for at your house. Now, look,
Speaker 3: I don't want to pretend that the system is perfect,
Speaker 3: and there are any of critics who argue that these
Speaker 3: warrants are given out too easily, but at least it's something.
Speaker 3: It provides some independent oversight and it deters cops from
Speaker 3: making dodgy applications for warrants. It does when it comes
Speaker 3: to celebrate. There is no legislation in New South Wales,
Speaker 3: or for that matter, in any Australian jurisdiction that requires
Speaker 3: the police to get a warrant to search your phone,
Speaker 3: and from experience, I can tell you that the cops
Speaker 3: take the view that if they get their hands on
Speaker 3: your phone, they can celebrate it without approval from anyone.
Speaker 3: So how can they get your phone? Well, there are
Speaker 3: several ways. One is, if you've been arrested for whatever reason.
Speaker 3: For that situation, the police can seize.
Speaker 1: You and that's as something that is legitimate reason. They
Speaker 1: can just arrest you so that they have access to
Speaker 1: taking your phone, and then no matter what your crime is,
Speaker 1: they're going to use that as justification for learning everything
Speaker 1: about you. And anybody you've ever been in contact with.
Speaker 1: So think about this, even if it's not you that
Speaker 1: they do that too. What if it's someone you know,
Speaker 1: but if it's somebody that's been around you with their phone,
Speaker 1: do you see how they can avail everybody by you know,
Speaker 1: it's like the piggyback thing. This is kind of like
Speaker 1: the same way, even though he's in a retired Dan
Speaker 1: Bongino was talking about how the levels of surveillance operated
Speaker 1: for spying on people that the government or the NSA
Speaker 1: or the Five Eyes or whatever aren't supposed to, but
Speaker 1: they do it by this other thing where if they're
Speaker 1: surveilling somebody who's associated with it, but they have made
Speaker 1: some sort of false justification for well then if you know,
Speaker 1: it's like the peering eye thing, the line of site,
Speaker 1: well then if they find something out about the perse
Speaker 1: people around them, then they can jump over to here
Speaker 1: and do the surveillance. And it just keeps on. It
Speaker 1: keeps on like a you know, branching out further and further.
Speaker 1: It's like a it's like a snowball rolling down a hill.
Speaker 1: It just keeps picking up more and more momentum. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's interesting, that's a little BUSI that looks off. So
Speaker 1: it's they don't have the building through fourth amend to
Speaker 1: be prying into this type of information at all whatsoever.
Speaker 1: But they do it. They do it because those things
Speaker 1: don't exist anymore, because we haven't enforced them in over
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty years after they brutally devastated us
Speaker 1: with a civil war, and I think at the level
Speaker 1: of our own DNA like traumatized every generation that came
Speaker 1: after to become timid and cowardly because of the brutality
Speaker 1: of the whole thing that occurred.
Speaker 3: A warrant if they reasonably suspect that it will provide
Speaker 3: evidence of the commission of any offense, regardless of how
Speaker 3: trivial it is. But even if you're not under arrest,
Speaker 3: the police have the power to take your phone without
Speaker 3: a warrant in various situations. For example, the police of
Speaker 3: the power to stop and search you and your car
Speaker 3: without a warrant, then they have reasonable grounds to suspect
Speaker 3: that you're in possession of a prohibited drug. Now, it's
Speaker 3: important to understand that there's no minimum quantity of the drug.
Speaker 3: So if the cops suspect that you've got even just
Speaker 3: a tiny amount.
Speaker 1: You have to have. Okay, what's the You can't do
Speaker 1: You could say that about anybody. How do they how
Speaker 1: do they prove that they have a reasonable suspicion in
Speaker 1: the first place? You know, the reasonable take a little
Speaker 1: whatever the hell the acronym is the articulate, articulable suspicion,
Speaker 1: reasonable is the is the first word. How do they
Speaker 1: know that? They just decided that person has a car.
Speaker 1: That's a little bit dilapidata. I bet you they have drugs.
Speaker 1: Let's pull them over. Let's let's let's look for a crime.
Speaker 1: Let's go look for a crime.
Speaker 3: Weed or coke on you. They can search you, and
Speaker 3: once they search you, they can seize your phone if
Speaker 3: they reason to.
Speaker 1: Say, they don't just go oh look cookt we suspect
Speaker 1: and evidence of what they call a relevant defense, which
Speaker 1: covers most crimes.
Speaker 3: An even easier way for the police to get your
Speaker 3: phone is if they do it with your consent. And
Speaker 3: you might be asking, why would anyone agree to give
Speaker 3: up their phones the police, Well, it actually happens a lot.
Speaker 3: You see, most people don't know their riots, and they're
Speaker 3: intimidated by the police. They think that anything a police
Speaker 3: officer asked them to do they have to do, and
Speaker 3: a lot of cops know this and take advantage of it. Now,
Speaker 3: I should add that some defense lawyers in Australia have
Speaker 3: tried to challenge the status quote, and they've argued that
Speaker 3: the police actually do need a search warrant to celebrate
Speaker 3: your phone. In doing so, they've relied on a twenty
Speaker 3: fourteen case from the United States called Riley versus California.
Speaker 3: In Riley, the US Supreme Court held that the police
Speaker 3: do generally need a search warrant to search a mobile phone.
Speaker 3: One of the main reasons for its decision was it's
Speaker 3: finding that searching a phone is more akin to searching
Speaker 3: someone's house, which you need a warrant for, than searching
Speaker 3: their person, which you don't need a warrant for. In fact,
Speaker 3: the court found that searching someone's phone can be even
Speaker 3: more intrusive than searching their home. Now, if this argument
Speaker 3: made sense back in twenty fourteen, it makes a lot
Speaker 3: more sense in twenty twenty five, given how far the
Speaker 3: technology has evolved since then. Our phones now hold a
Speaker 3: lot more sensitive data than they did a decade ago,
Speaker 3: and with the help of Celebrate the police now have
Speaker 3: the ability to download all of it, but unfortunately these
Speaker 3: legal challenges in Australia have been unsuccessful and the position
Speaker 3: remains that the police don't need a warrant to celebrate
Speaker 3: your phone.
Speaker 1: And it's important to add minds the thing, Okay, well
Speaker 1: you want you want this information for me, give me
Speaker 1: your phone, held me your phone. And the people who
Speaker 1: say that, you know, this is what Lewis Rossmith said too,
Speaker 1: is that all these people say, well, if you're not
Speaker 1: doing anything wrong with this, make blah blah. He's like, okay,
Speaker 1: He's like, hen me your phone, give me your phone,
Speaker 1: all right, because nobody's gonna do that. Nobody's gonna hand
Speaker 1: over their phone. They're going to talk a bunch of
Speaker 1: shit about how if they're not doing anything wrong, it's
Speaker 1: still sensitive information. It's still your personal private information. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter if you're doing something wrong or not. And
Speaker 1: who the fuck is going to determine what's right and
Speaker 1: wrong when there are a bunch of demonic criminals that
Speaker 1: are going to try to make you feel guilty or
Speaker 1: feel bad or feel like you know, you need to
Speaker 1: be remorseful or repentant against something that you do are
Speaker 1: you out of your mind? These people are child killers
Speaker 1: and they're going to determine the morality give me a break.
Speaker 3: Thanks experience, a lot of cops download phones as standard practice,
Speaker 3: regardless of how trivial the case is and whether they
Speaker 3: actually think it's going to help their investigation. Now, in
Speaker 3: some cases I've been able to persuade the police not
Speaker 3: to celebrate a client's phone, but it's usually up to
Speaker 3: the good will of you.
Speaker 1: How do you know they didn't your office.
Speaker 3: Are and that's something we don't always see a lot
Speaker 3: of the result of all of this is that the
Speaker 3: police are downloading mobile phones at an alarming rate in
Speaker 3: this state. Now we don't actually know how many phones
Speaker 3: New South Wales police are celebrating each year because they're
Speaker 3: not required to report this, but we know from anecdotal
Speaker 3: evidence that it's massive.
Speaker 1: And here's a good thing. Again, they have more data
Speaker 1: than just yours now because they have everything that you've
Speaker 1: interacted with and everybody you've interacted with. So again, this
Speaker 1: makes people not want to associate with one another, right,
Speaker 1: They don't want to be around each other. I don't
Speaker 1: think phones should be carried around in public to be
Speaker 1: personally on it's with you at all. I don't think
Speaker 1: you should drive with them. I don't think you should
Speaker 1: go into stores with them. I think you should leave
Speaker 1: if you're going to If if you can't not drive
Speaker 1: with it because you're worried about a flat tire or
Speaker 1: something calling for whatever, get a different phone that doesn't
Speaker 1: have anything that crap on it. Maybe get a ship
Speaker 1: phone that has buttons on it you need to dial
Speaker 1: somebody for your insurance or whatever. But other than that, like,
Speaker 1: how long do we live without the need for that before?
Speaker 1: How long? Why are we depending on it now? You're
Speaker 1: going to freak out because you can't distract your brain.
Speaker 1: Maybe we need to start having longer attention spans and
Speaker 1: think about things and you know, contemput your day. Instead
Speaker 1: of having your brain being distracted all the time, the time,
Speaker 1: you can plan to make yourself better, make yourself more money.
Speaker 1: You could all be done without this thing in your face.
Speaker 1: Because all the stuff that they're gathering, they're not gonna
Speaker 1: just delete it because you didn't they didn't find something
Speaker 1: on you. They're going to hold onto it and they
Speaker 1: ay're going to be able to utilize that data down
Speaker 1: the road somewhere against you or someone else that you're
Speaker 1: faciliated with, or somebody that you walked past. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is the level of surveillance that we're talking about here,
Speaker 1: just with one person's phone, and how many how that
Speaker 1: opens up access for that criminal agency that's masquerading as
Speaker 1: an authority to pry into other people's lives and maybe
Speaker 1: find targets of who they want to take their phone
Speaker 1: up next. And so it goes you an idea, just
Speaker 1: with my practice and monitoring where your children's activity is
Speaker 1: through your phone and through theirs. Because of the interaction
Speaker 1: and the closerness, the proximity of it being with you
Speaker 1: and then not, they can tell how far away they
Speaker 1: are from you at all times, so that they can
Speaker 1: decide if they want to be predatorial when to go
Speaker 1: after your child.
Speaker 3: Here, I received dozens of Celebrate reports and phones that
Speaker 3: have been downloaded, and I'm just one criminal lawyer of
Speaker 3: thousands in this state. The other day I spoke with
Speaker 3: a colleague who had recently cross examined an officer Alady Hearing.
Speaker 3: The officer gave evidence that she downloads about twenty mobile
Speaker 3: phones per.
Speaker 1: Week, first of all officers, and she should not go together.
Speaker 1: Soldier and she should not go together at all.
Speaker 3: And that's just one police officer in one police station.
Speaker 3: There are more than four hundred police stations in New
Speaker 3: South Wales alone, So I don't think it's far fetched
Speaker 3: to estimate that the New South Wales Police Force is
Speaker 3: downloading tens of thousands of phones each year. And that's
Speaker 3: just one agency in one state. Just imagine what the
Speaker 3: number is nationwide. Now, some of you might be thinking, okay,
Speaker 3: but the police are only doing this to criminals, right,
Speaker 3: so who cares? Well? The first thing to remember is
Speaker 3: that not everyone who the police stop and search ends
Speaker 3: up being charged, and not everyone who is charged ends
Speaker 3: up being found guilty. A large number of my clients
Speaker 3: who had their phones celebrated end up walking free. Another
Speaker 3: important thing to know is that the police also regularly
Speaker 3: celebrate the phones of victims and witnesses of crimes. I
Speaker 3: see this especially in cases involving allegations.
Speaker 1: Of sexualist victims and witnesses of crimes to get their
Speaker 1: phone celebrated to not just the quote unquote person who
Speaker 1: did something wrong.
Speaker 3: Oh, where the police will download the complainant's phone to
Speaker 3: get the messages they exchanged with the accused or with
Speaker 3: their friends about the incident. Now plenty of times the
Speaker 3: messages are relevant.
Speaker 1: To celebrate is just one word, one name of one
Speaker 1: Israeli a company of many, just like Pegasus and Nso,
Speaker 1: just like Social not just like Shadow Dragon Man oh Man,
Speaker 1: oh Man. This is the digital checker. Quite literally, the
Speaker 1: very people that made up of the checker, that made
Speaker 1: up the Bolsheviks, still at work on a larger scale worldwide,
Speaker 1: utilizing corporate But it's just a proxy. The control is
Speaker 1: still the control, and it's still coming to the same
Speaker 1: same source. And that's if I try to explain anything,
Speaker 1: I hope that's what I'm what I'm describing, even if
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it directly, It's what I'm thinking and
Speaker 1: I'm trying to convey, is that all of these things
Speaker 1: have one centralized commonality. It's one entity, and this is
Speaker 1: how it expresses itself and expands across the world to
Speaker 1: control things. It controls countries, It utilizes as a tool
Speaker 1: corporations and these things to act as if they're separate
Speaker 1: from their control, but they're not. It's all the same animal,
Speaker 1: it's all the same cult. The cult is the Jewish
Speaker 1: banking of cult. It's the Saturn cult. It's the serpent cult,
Speaker 1: if you want to go back that far. It is
Speaker 1: in control of worldwide medicine, which is allopathy, which is evil, wrong,
Speaker 1: and sorcery and witchcraft and pharmachia. It is a death
Speaker 1: cult of pharmacuea okay, so that's a great way to
Speaker 1: suppress people. It's in charge of the regulations of all
Speaker 1: the poisons that they force into food, force into farmers crops,
Speaker 1: and they are the manufacturers of said chemical ridden food
Speaker 1: because of the umbrella corporations controlling all these things like
Speaker 1: craft in this and you buy something that's processed, you're
Speaker 1: gonna get the poisons because they've actually legislated them in
Speaker 1: so that you can't even make certain claims about food
Speaker 1: or say that they're self stable or that they're you know,
Speaker 1: they're not going to go bad at a certain time.
Speaker 1: You can't even put a cell by it, you know,
Speaker 1: sell by data it, or say it's a good until
Speaker 1: this day unless you put this chemical that they want
Speaker 1: you to put in there into there. This is not
Speaker 1: for your benefit. This is that cult in control of
Speaker 1: your entire reality, and it's poison, poison, poison, just like
Speaker 1: these people have been poisoning the well and people and
Speaker 1: stabbing them with poison and you know, plunging poison in
Speaker 1: them for a long long time. And if you want
Speaker 1: to talk about the poisoning aspect itself, it goes back
Speaker 1: thousands upon thousands, about thousands of the years, all the
Speaker 1: way down to the Edda where they were they were
Speaker 1: experimenting on the populace, just like they were in uh
Speaker 1: Poalomese dynasty in Alexandria Egypt, Alexandria, they were utilizing quote
Speaker 1: unquote prisoners to test different types of snake venom on
Speaker 1: them to see how they died and what they went
Speaker 1: through to depict certain poisons for mass use on other
Speaker 1: enemies of theirs. That's that's as far back as that's
Speaker 1: pretty sick.
Speaker 3: That was.
Speaker 1: I think it was clear Patch of the seventh who
Speaker 1: actually killed herself by selecting one of those for her own.
Speaker 1: And that's we're supposed to believe that she killed herself
Speaker 1: and that wasn't foul play, but she uh scratched her
Speaker 1: skin with it, and uh she picked thecuse after sitting
Speaker 1: there without a complete indifference to her to her brutality
Speaker 1: as she was killing people who who knows what they did.
Speaker 1: Maybe they stole bread, who the hell knows what the
Speaker 1: what their crime was. But they would utilize different snake
Speaker 1: venoms to see which one, you know, which ones were
Speaker 1: most effective, and she chokes one for herself, so they
Speaker 1: say it's to kill herself. She did kill her, She
Speaker 1: did die of snake venom, but we don't know if
Speaker 1: it was by you know, foul player was her. It's
Speaker 1: pretty interesting. But this whole cult is what I'm trying
Speaker 1: to get at, and it's what I'm saying. It's been
Speaker 1: the same entity that has been at war with mankind
Speaker 1: and the other European ancestors for five thousand years or more,
Speaker 1: and they have not changed their nature in all that time.
Speaker 1: And throughout his you can see the same patterns of behavior,
Speaker 1: the same refusal to assimilate or to accept or to
Speaker 1: do any type of farming because that's not the way
Speaker 1: they want to steal, and they want to make other
Speaker 1: people work for them. They feel superior even though they're inferior.
Speaker 1: And then when they when they realize this, they start
Speaker 1: to integrate in co mingle, which has the same thing
Speaker 1: as fucking other ethnic groups to make their seem more desirable,
Speaker 1: more desirable traits in the meantime, still trying to annihilate
Speaker 1: everyone else. But it's the fact that they commingle is
Speaker 1: an open ambission that they know that they're inferior, and
Speaker 1: so it goes throughout history. These people are in everything
Speaker 1: doing this is like I said, the digital cheka. This
Speaker 1: is how wides spread, this is, this is how vast
Speaker 1: this problem is. It's an intricately detailed into everything that
Speaker 1: you do. They create, They own your perception of reality.
Speaker 1: Most peoples, most people who still go to their doctors,
Speaker 1: who still take their prescription medicines, who still go to
Speaker 1: get flu shots and all kinds of other shots. Even
Speaker 1: the people who don't do shots, they're still going to
Speaker 1: go to their doctor when they feel pain, or they
Speaker 1: have a bump, oh my god, or they have a
Speaker 1: sore back. They're not going to go to chiropractor. Typically,
Speaker 1: they're going to go to someplace that their insurance covers,
Speaker 1: and then they're going to get medicine. But whether they
Speaker 1: take it or not, I don't know, but it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter because they're still in the cult. They're still bowing
Speaker 1: to the altar of this allopathic murder machine. And that's
Speaker 1: the first choice that they default go to when it's
Speaker 1: not necessary. Get what you need in your body, the
Speaker 1: ninety essentral nutrients. However you want to do it. I
Speaker 1: have two ways that are awesome. And then just stick
Speaker 1: with doctor Glyndon, stick with doctor Manzo. Keep yourself away
Speaker 1: from these people that are going to harm you. I
Speaker 1: go there for freaking pain in my in my in
Speaker 1: my abdomen or lower lower abdomen, and they juice me
Speaker 1: with five hundred times the radiation of an X ray
Speaker 1: and tell me that it was necessary. And then they
Speaker 1: tell me that they already knew that the kidney stone
Speaker 1: was there because of a previous time that they poisoned
Speaker 1: me with a bunch of radiation. Well, then why did
Speaker 1: they need to do it again? Why did they need
Speaker 1: to do it again? Because that was more more important
Speaker 1: than my than my health. Now, if they're gonna if
Speaker 1: they're going to prioritize like that in that one instance,
Speaker 1: what do you think they're going to do throughout the
Speaker 1: rest of way? Do you think they change their nature? For?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: No, it's a trap. Stay away from them. What's the alternative?
Speaker 1: I've already shown it to you. This, this is the
Speaker 1: system that we're in and the more we keep going
Speaker 1: and bowing to different parts of it, the more power
Speaker 1: they have over us, because they have power over the
Speaker 1: people that don't get it. And that's that basically is
Speaker 1: like the tidal wave that pulls us along with it
Speaker 1: is the current that pushes us along with it. We
Speaker 1: have to be fighting against that current. We have to
Speaker 1: swing and swimming upstream because we don't want to be
Speaker 1: flushed with the rest of them. And the more the
Speaker 1: more we try, it seems like the more they resist
Speaker 1: because they don't want to know and they don't want
Speaker 1: to hear, and it's harder for them to deny it. Well,
Speaker 1: does that mean we keep pushing or does that mean we
Speaker 1: are wasting our time? I don't know, but we have
Speaker 1: to at least know that it not gets fooled still,
Speaker 1: because then what good are we if we're If this
Speaker 1: is why I don't like the arrogance of some of
Speaker 1: these people online. And they're younger and they're stupid, and
Speaker 1: they think that they're brilliant, and they'll they'll talk down
Speaker 1: to people and say I discovered this or this that
Speaker 1: or blah blah blah, and you know, I must be
Speaker 1: so special because I'm getting this push back. It's like
Speaker 1: I've been doing this for seven years and I have
Speaker 1: better understanding of all these times than they do, because
Speaker 1: they're all they're doing is gleaning off of other people
Speaker 1: and then repackaging it and sending it out that you know,
Speaker 1: their their's their videos, and they're not doing any research
Speaker 1: at all. They're just watching other people's videos and they're
Speaker 1: doing it doing their own They're not reading, they're not
Speaker 1: doing anything. They're probably artificially created to distract people from
Speaker 1: actual reports of people who do do research. In fact,
Speaker 1: but they always say things like they're they're they'll they'll
Speaker 1: have this thing where they're very judgmental and condescending to
Speaker 1: people who so so it's like shaming people into believing
Speaker 1: in their way. It's a it's a really dirty tactic.
Speaker 1: And then they'll expose through their own statements that they
Speaker 1: also have absolutely no clue about other aspects of the
Speaker 1: same deception or the same deceivers, because they'll they'll wholeheartedly
Speaker 1: embrace something like the idea of a virus or COVID
Speaker 1: nine or vaccinations or some other thing, and it's just like,
Speaker 1: are you now you're still oh, because you're smarty pants
Speaker 1: and this because you think you have some little nugget
Speaker 1: and you're like, I'm a king now because I have
Speaker 1: this nuggative information. You don't even know what it is,
Speaker 1: and you don't know the implications and how far the
Speaker 1: roots are, how deep the roots are as to how
Speaker 1: you could have walked that back and found a whole
Speaker 1: lot more other things that were going on that were
Speaker 1: just that were bad, that would have that it would
Speaker 1: have given you a bigger picture, and they never see it.
Speaker 1: They never see that picture because they're fake people and
Speaker 1: their their obnoxious arrogance bothers me like, how can you
Speaker 1: be like anti Oh, don't commingle with these people? Blahlah
Speaker 1: blah blah, And then be like asking people, are you
Speaker 1: are you an anti semi? Do you validate that comma?
Speaker 1: Do you honestly validate anti Semitism? It's anti evil. If
Speaker 1: you're anti evil and these people do a lot of evil,
Speaker 1: they're gonna say that you're an anti this. Who cares
Speaker 1: what the fuck they say? Who cares what they say?
Speaker 1: You know, you're not a bad person. In fact, you're
Speaker 1: witnessing really bad things happening, and you're and you're recognizing
Speaker 1: who's doing it. It doesn't matter about their other attributes.
Speaker 1: A murderer is a murderer. You don't like them because
Speaker 1: they're murderers, not because of what they do and what
Speaker 1: kind of clothes they wear. Like, why do I care
Speaker 1: where you go to pray? I get a flying fuck
Speaker 1: unless that that place is a place where they plot
Speaker 1: to kill you, then I care. Then it's then it's
Speaker 1: a terrorist organization designed and you just call it a synagogue.
Speaker 1: That's when it becomes a problem. I don't go to
Speaker 1: I don't go to a place. I don't go to
Speaker 1: any group, and oh, look there's a cross on the wall,
Speaker 1: and let's plot the death of people. If we don't
Speaker 1: do that, only they do.
Speaker 3: That definitely should be disclosed to the defense. But they
Speaker 3: are real issues with the way the police go about it.
Speaker 3: Sometimes firstly by using celebrates you fit, the police don't
Speaker 3: just download the relevant messages from the complainant's phone, but
Speaker 3: all of the data. Secondly, the police will then often
Speaker 3: provide the defense with the copy of the entire download
Speaker 3: of the complainant's phone. Now, again that's helpful for US
Speaker 3: defense lawyers because it can contain relevant information, but the
Speaker 3: truth is the vast majority of the data is completely
Speaker 3: irrelevant and often very private. An example of this happening
Speaker 3: was in the high profile sexual assault prosecution of Bruce
Speaker 3: Lean a few years ago. In that case, the Australian
Speaker 3: Federal Police provided the entire celebrate download of Britney Higgins's phone,
Speaker 3: which even included her counseling notes to Lehman's lawyers. Some
Speaker 3: of the phone's content, like text messages she had sent
Speaker 3: to certain people pride to making the complaint, were clearly
Speaker 3: relevant and damaging to her credibility, but most of the
Speaker 3: data was entirely relevant or otherwise inadmissible, like a counseling notes,
Speaker 3: and shouldn't have been served. Now. The police in that
Speaker 3: case said they gave the defense.
Speaker 1: Mose just to seven just so you're aware. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: the whole rabies, which is got used to call hydrophobia.
Speaker 1: That is one of the biggest indicators. That's not the biggest,
Speaker 1: but it's one of the frauds of pastor. And that's
Speaker 1: why reading the book A Champar Pasture, as well as
Speaker 1: reading the Blood in its third anatomical Element by Antoine
Speaker 1: Beschamp himself, are essential for understanding the great, great deception.
Speaker 1: A Champer Pasture is by Ethel Hume. Everybody should read it.
Speaker 1: I've read parts of it here. But no, he's this
Speaker 1: is all based off of dorminism, which is another fraud,
Speaker 1: and it's part of the cult. It's the it's the
Speaker 1: Freemasonic slash Cabbalistic slash ancient cult that I keep talking
Speaker 1: about perpetuating and pushing and reforming our belief in science
Speaker 1: and into scientism, which is just another structure where they
Speaker 1: try to validate their own Kabbala mysticism and point it
Speaker 1: off as being real. And they utilize things like NASA
Speaker 1: and all this other shit to verify shit that they
Speaker 1: said that they that they discovered themselves. It's it's all
Speaker 1: to validate lies. So one liar tells another person's lie
Speaker 1: and also that's real, and they do it through science.
Speaker 1: So therefore you think that you're you're just not smart enough.
Speaker 1: And they must be the ones with the day they
Speaker 1: got all the big microscopes in the way in the
Speaker 1: white coach. They they must know what they're talking about. No,
Speaker 1: the very concept of vaccination is evil, sol is and wrong.
Speaker 1: It destroys, It forces your body to react, and it
Speaker 1: makes your pleomorphic microzyma have to react in a certain
Speaker 1: way to maintain and stabilize the system, and if it can't,
Speaker 1: then it throws it off balance and bad things happen.
Speaker 1: And it's deliberate that they're doing this, playing around with
Speaker 1: different types of potions, and the sick, sick, depraved shit
Speaker 1: is what they force upon us still, and they're gonna
Speaker 1: have AI with a five hundred billion dollar budget oracle
Speaker 1: custom make poison to kill us more efficiently. This is
Speaker 1: the word we're walking into, guys. And if you don't comply,
Speaker 1: they've got all kinds of cameras around you. They'll know
Speaker 1: if you don't spoiler your pill. They'll know if you
Speaker 1: don't get the injection. That'll probably have some sort of
Speaker 1: tracker in it too, because they like putting tech in.
Speaker 1: You verify that you've taken it through some sort of
Speaker 1: beacon signal that they can receive back from your body,
Speaker 1: some sort of Mac address.
Speaker 3: Higgins phone download by mistake, but I've seen several cases
Speaker 3: where it's been done knowingly. In other cases, the police
Speaker 3: might not serve the entire download of the phone, but
Speaker 3: they'll still serve a lot more than they should. For example,
Speaker 3: a year ago, I was representing a guy who'd been
Speaker 3: charged with sexually assaulting a woman during a hinge date.
Speaker 3: When the police served the prosecution evidence on my office,
Speaker 3: it included a partial celebrity download of her phone that
Speaker 3: contained sexually explicit messages that she had exchanged with another
Speaker 3: guy that had nothing to do with the case. The
Speaker 3: messages were never going to be admitted as evidence at
Speaker 3: my client's trial, but the cops gave them to us anyway.
Speaker 3: Another major issue is the lack of communication by police
Speaker 3: when they ask alleged victims to hand over their phones.
Speaker 3: To give you an example, a few months ago, I
Speaker 3: gave advice to a woman who was an alleged victim
Speaker 3: of sexual assault and domestic violence by her ex partner.
Speaker 3: When she first made the complaint, she showed the police
Speaker 3: the relevant messages on her phone. After her x was charged,
Speaker 3: the cops asked for the phone so they could download
Speaker 3: the messages, but at no stage they tell her that
Speaker 3: they were going to download her entire phone and then
Speaker 3: give it to her ex as lawyers. So she was
Speaker 3: understandably pretty distressed when she found out that AREX now
Speaker 3: had a copy of all of her messages. With her
Speaker 3: friends and family, her photos, her health data, everything. She
Speaker 3: told me that had she known the police were going
Speaker 3: to do this, she might have thought twice about handing
Speaker 3: over her phone to them. It might surprise you to
Speaker 3: know that what I've just described is actually a pretty
Speaker 3: common experience for sexual assault complainers. In fact, it's so
Speaker 3: common that in the recent inquiry by the Australian Law
Speaker 3: Reform Commission into Justice responses to sexual violence, the advocacy
Speaker 3: group Full Stop Australia recommended a review of this celebrating
Speaker 3: practice to protect victims privacy. Interestingly, the lawa Firm Commission
Speaker 3: didn't adopt the recommendation in its final report, but regardless,
Speaker 3: I think this is a phenomenon that will receive a
Speaker 3: lot more media attention in the years to come. The
Speaker 3: next issue I want to talk about briefly is the
Speaker 3: lack of oversight when it comes to celebrate use. There
Speaker 3: are laws in this country that are designed to provide
Speaker 3: some accountability to the public about the use of police
Speaker 3: powers that undermine our civil liberties. For example, like I
Speaker 3: mentioned a bit earlier, each year, the Federal Attorney General
Speaker 3: publishes a report that discloses important in telephone interceptions need
Speaker 3: to install listening devices hidden cameras from their database indefinitely.
Speaker 3: The same goes if you're an alleged victim of crime.
Speaker 3: Hughse Britney Higgins as an example, again, the Celebrate download
Speaker 3: a phone sat with the police long after the criminal
Speaker 3: prosecution of Layman being discontinued and all fifty six thousand
Speaker 3: pages of it ended up being subpainted in entirely separate
Speaker 3: defamation proceedings.
Speaker 1: See, that's why you need that's why you need to
Speaker 1: get patent her organization to AI so that it can
Speaker 1: sift through that fifty six thousand pages of just random
Speaker 1: data points and make sense of it if you're looking
Speaker 1: for something. But again, will AI hallucinate? Will it look
Speaker 1: for a pattern that's not there because of your request?
Speaker 1: Will develop some sort of you know, assumptions in between
Speaker 1: that weren't necessarily there, that could make a break of
Speaker 1: the truth of a matter. How's their accountability to figure
Speaker 1: that out unless you go through the same fifty six
Speaker 1: thousand you know, pages of data yourself and make sure
Speaker 1: that that's not true. And that's kind of defeats the
Speaker 1: purpose of using it at all. So it's like it's
Speaker 1: like believing the translator what the knuniform means. How do
Speaker 1: you know that they know what the canoliform means? Then
Speaker 1: they are not just making something up because they want
Speaker 1: you to believe it. If you don't know how to
Speaker 1: read the kennuniform, how do you know that they're not
Speaker 1: lying to you? How do you know they didn't just
Speaker 1: make a mistake. How do you know they didn't, you know,
Speaker 1: use creative license in a place where it was a
Speaker 1: little bit faded, or they just didn't know so they guessed.
Speaker 1: So how do you ever go and base anything like
Speaker 1: oh oh or dead languages that you don't speak? So
Speaker 1: how do you trust that this is the word God
Speaker 1: word of God and that it's not just man manipulating
Speaker 1: other men through their their claims that God did this
Speaker 1: and God said that. How do you know? You don't
Speaker 1: You don't know how many times it's been changed. You
Speaker 1: don't know if there's even words in your language that
Speaker 1: would properly and effectively and accurately express what they were
Speaker 1: saying in that language, or if the euphemism of that
Speaker 1: was even supposed to be taken little of that, or
Speaker 1: if it was so vague of a language because it
Speaker 1: was such a primitive language that they took a lot
Speaker 1: of creative license into making it into something that it
Speaker 1: wasn't even said. So it's a bunch of bullshit to
Speaker 1: believe in it and constantly like harp on it like
Speaker 1: oh this, and then again the same thing with anything.
Speaker 1: So go back to the AI. How do we know
Speaker 1: if we're not doing the inspection ourselves, if we're not
Speaker 1: doing the analysis ourselves. How do we know if we're
Speaker 1: not able or capable of doing the analysis ourselves. How
Speaker 1: do we know that they're not lying to us? How
Speaker 1: do you know that there's no uh, you know, malicious
Speaker 1: type of what do you call it? Lenient? It leans
Speaker 1: towards the negative of something because of the way it's
Speaker 1: programmed and design to look for or fabricate something in
Speaker 1: the negative, regardless if it's there or not. How do
Speaker 1: we know that that's not programmed into the so that
Speaker 1: they can find reasons to incriminate. Why would we trust
Speaker 1: any of this? Why would we trust the people behind it?
Speaker 1: Why would we trust somebody like Alex Karp who wants
Speaker 1: to murder people, who wants the GOI to die? Why
Speaker 1: would we trust Peter Thiel who wants the GOI to
Speaker 1: die and takes it in the anus or open ai
Speaker 1: who also does Why are we allowing the biggest disgusting
Speaker 1: sodomites in perverse, psychopathic people who hate mankind and want
Speaker 1: the majority of us to die to have so much power?
Speaker 1: Why is Trump empowering them and giving the wealth of
Speaker 1: the nation over to them? Your money or your your wealth?
Speaker 1: Money's bullshit, right, because he's just a face on. He's
Speaker 1: just a mask on, the same demon, the same demon
Speaker 1: that controls all of Europe, the same demon that controls
Speaker 1: all of Europe, that also controls the Federal Reserve and
Speaker 1: everything here, that created the baby that they call Israel,
Speaker 1: so that Israel could cause problems that America could pretend
Speaker 1: that they had nothing to do with. But yet they
Speaker 1: fund so therefore, who's problem? Whose action plan is it? Really?
Speaker 1: If America funds something and gives weapons to someone, it's
Speaker 1: their desire that a certain outcome occurs, So therefore they
Speaker 1: are the ones causing the conflict. If it's in the Ukraine,
Speaker 1: that means we're at war with Russia. If it's between Gaza,
Speaker 1: that means America is at war with Palestine and every
Speaker 1: other country in the Middle East, that these faggots bomb.
Speaker 1: Put the blame where it belongs. Who who's handing out
Speaker 1: the funds, who's giving the weapons over to them? Israel
Speaker 1: is not the scary person. We are are our demons
Speaker 1: that run us just represent themselves more clearly in the
Speaker 1: Mirror's reflection that is Israel.
Speaker 3: By Layman against Network ten, and then in defamation proceedings
Speaker 3: brought by former Senator Linda Reynolds against miss Higgins.
Speaker 1: I care about this part. Let's go on.
Speaker 3: Here, your daughter will end up and who will get
Speaker 3: to see it. Perhaps the most important question with all
Speaker 3: of this is can Celebrate it self access to the
Speaker 3: data that is downloaded from people's phones. In an interview
Speaker 3: with Israeli Nadier in two thousand and nine, then CEO
Speaker 3: yose Khama boasted that Celebrate controlled all products remotely. Now,
Speaker 3: that could be seen as an admission about access to data,
Speaker 3: but I accept it's not entirely clear what he meant.
Speaker 3: As a lawyer, I'm evidence based and I try to
Speaker 3: avoid unfounded speculation. Having said that, and just based on
Speaker 3: what we've spoken about until now, I don't think it's
Speaker 3: some far fetched conspiracy theory to think that Celebrate may
Speaker 3: be able to access the data that's being extracted from
Speaker 3: people's phones using its products. I mean, let's not forget
Speaker 3: that we're talking about a company that is made up
Speaker 3: of elite Israeli Army intelligence veterans, and it still has
Speaker 3: very close ties with Israeli military. So if any company
Speaker 3: has the know how and the motive to collect the data,
Speaker 3: it's Celebrate. But let's look at the evidence specifically. I'm
Speaker 3: going to talk about two documents.
Speaker 1: That are highly reverted, making these distinctions as if they're
Speaker 1: not one and the same. Just because a branch of
Speaker 1: a murderous organization decided to go into business, it doesn't
Speaker 1: legitimize themselves as being something separate from that entity that
Speaker 1: is the enforcer or the viol the violence bringers. It
Speaker 1: just means that they have an IT department. Now, that's
Speaker 1: what the eighty two hundred is everywhere in this country,
Speaker 1: all over your social media, and these are people tied
Speaker 1: directly to Celebrate and other companies and so Shadow Dragon
Speaker 1: all these other places. Eighty two hundreds ringled with all
Speaker 1: this crap. That's what's doing the surveillance over TikTok that
Speaker 1: was happening before they even sold and forced to sell, right,
Speaker 1: they were forced to sell? What kind of power do
Speaker 1: you think that is when an entire country? Oh wait,
Speaker 1: never mind, I forgot because the Chinese people aren't really
Speaker 1: Chinese in the first place, so they were going to
Speaker 1: sell because they were told to. They haven't been they
Speaker 1: Chinamen haven't been in control of Chinas And Smile Channel
Speaker 1: wasn't as fucked up as it is now and it
Speaker 1: wouldn't have been of Shan Kai check made it to
Speaker 1: the top of the level there. He's out read than
Speaker 1: having to flee to Taiwan because we we sort of
Speaker 1: betrayed him a little bit, didn't we? Our demonic government
Speaker 1: that is lying liars who lie? Who else is a
Speaker 1: lying liar who lies? Oh yeah, that Saturn guy and
Speaker 1: his cult killing. But as far as I'm a seating
Speaker 1: guy in his cult.
Speaker 3: Where have never been reported on? The documents are contracts
Speaker 3: between Celebrate and Services Australia. One is a license agreement
Speaker 3: for the use of Celebrating and access the data that's
Speaker 3: being downloaded from our phones. How often this is occurring,
Speaker 3: we don't know and we can't find out due to
Speaker 3: the complete lack of transparency. Now the contracts I've just
Speaker 3: spoken about are owning with Services Australia. So you might
Speaker 3: be asking, are there similar clauses and Celebrates contracts with
Speaker 3: other agencies. Well, from the research I've car out, the
Speaker 3: answer seems to be yes. Although it's not easy to find,
Speaker 3: celebrates current license agreement is available on its website. The
Speaker 3: agreement is almost identical to the one with Services Australia,
Speaker 3: and crucially, it includes the same clause authorizing Celebrate to
Speaker 3: access data held by customers. The only other Celebrate license
Speaker 3: agreement I've been able to locate online is that from
Speaker 3: the Gilbert Police Department in Arizona, USA. No look at
Speaker 3: that was buried at the back of some council minutes
Speaker 3: and so I'm not sure if many people have even
Speaker 3: seen them before. Here you can see the same clause
Speaker 3: authorizing Celebrates access to customer data in certain circumstances. This
Speaker 3: is in my state, so that celebrates license agreement. But
Speaker 3: what about its contract for services, Well it doesn't app It.
Speaker 1: Is really surveillance in my state in this country at all.
Speaker 1: Why is it so saturated with them Because they're not
Speaker 1: the same, They're not a separate entity. And if you
Speaker 1: want to put the real face on America. It's already
Speaker 1: been them. Why else would we have funded a Bolshevik
Speaker 1: revolution and fought two World wars to destroy all resistance
Speaker 1: against them? And then when did when did the vast
Speaker 1: amount of poisoning and GMO and crop dusting and all
Speaker 1: this sort of stuff start to occur? Well, kind of
Speaker 1: in between the two bars, but mostly after the second one,
Speaker 1: when they decided it's time to start poisoning the fucking
Speaker 1: population and lying about pandemics so that we can murder
Speaker 1: a bunch of goy because we go in the place.
Speaker 3: Now any copies of it publicly available, But I'd be
Speaker 3: surprised if the one I've obtained from Services Australia is
Speaker 3: not standard. From the way the contract is drafted, it
Speaker 3: appears to be generic. And also most tech companies generally
Speaker 3: use the same contract with all customers to ensure consistency.
Speaker 1: Like I would. How is it that I wouldn't be
Speaker 1: you know, some way that they could contact where they're
Speaker 1: doing a documentary. These these people who have millions of
Speaker 1: dollars to throw at a documentary that then they don't
Speaker 1: basically have any explanation as to how or why they
Speaker 1: spent that money because you can always find the stuff online,
Speaker 1: so you don't have to pay for it, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean? Like, where did that come from? Who
Speaker 1: who invested into that? Who are these sponsors and investors
Speaker 1: who create things like the like the Occupied documentary. I
Speaker 1: think gold Cot was one of them, went back in
Speaker 1: the day that did a lot of these spn ones.
Speaker 1: But where do where do the people even get into it? Like, so,
Speaker 1: does that mean stud doing all these networking or are
Speaker 1: they coming to him and or were they what do
Speaker 1: you call it? Were they related to the to the thing,
Speaker 1: same thing that created him? And this is jow that
Speaker 1: they have their creative persona person out front that they're
Speaker 1: doing all this other's things in his you know, image,
Speaker 1: basically in his name, because he's the he's the he's
Speaker 1: the face of their controlled up.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know, just asking because I didn't I didn't
Speaker 1: have anybody banging down my door trying to give me
Speaker 1: millions of dollars to do a documentary. When they said no,
Speaker 1: it's okay, we got the we have the know how,
Speaker 1: we have the camera crew. You don't have to know
Speaker 1: how to do any of that stuff yourself. If you
Speaker 1: got all the equipment. We want to do a documentary.
Speaker 1: You seem to know a bunch of stuff. Let's, uh,
Speaker 1: let's make a really awesome, kick ass documentary that help
Speaker 1: people understand things. No one's called me, no one, no
Speaker 1: one's sent me an email? Why not? Why did somebody
Speaker 1: else get it?
Speaker 7: Like what they is?
Speaker 1: The purpose that?
Speaker 3: Why?
Speaker 1: Why would so much money invested eight to ten million
Speaker 1: dollars on these on these documentaries, probably even more than
Speaker 1: that for what? For what payout? What are they actually
Speaker 1: gaining from it besides quieting or putting into obscurity other
Speaker 1: people who aren't controlled, who were seeing all these things
Speaker 1: that they then find in a documentary because they were
Speaker 1: siphoning this information from people who were actually doing all
Speaker 1: the reporting and all the investigation and all the research,
Speaker 1: and then changing it so that your information goes deep
Speaker 1: and digs up some really bad dirt on people and
Speaker 1: their's mentions the same stuff that you do, but skims
Speaker 1: the surface, protects certain people, keeps things vague.
Speaker 3: Another troubling piece of this puzzle is that we don't
Speaker 3: know where government agencies store the data they download from
Speaker 3: our phones. Now I know from experience, the police in
Speaker 3: this country have traditionally saved the data on computers and
Speaker 3: hard drives at the station. However, Celebrate is slowly but
Speaker 3: surely transitioning its products to the cloud that some products
Speaker 3: now operate exclusively on the cloud. Here's a primo video
Speaker 3: from last September for celebrates Pathfinder product, encouraging customers to
Speaker 3: use the product and host its data on the cloud
Speaker 3: instead of on local servers.
Speaker 2: Deploying in the cloud allows your agency to invest more time, money,
Speaker 2: and read.
Speaker 1: You know where. They say the storm's coming, and they
Speaker 1: kept on doing the same thing with the jump. The
Speaker 1: clouds are required for the storm, and the storm is
Speaker 1: not a good one. These are the dark clouds. This
Speaker 1: is the data demon. This is this is the eighth
Speaker 1: the ether of the devil, not the regular ethel the ether.
Speaker 3: This is.
Speaker 1: This is the AI brain right.
Speaker 2: Sources into fulfilling your core mission.
Speaker 3: Now, it's important to bear in mind that pathfind that
Speaker 3: analyzes the data downloaded using all Celebrate products. So presumably
Speaker 3: by using Pathfinder on the cloud, the agencies are uploading
Speaker 3: all of the data they've extracted from our phones and
Speaker 3: devices onto the cloud. Now this begs the question why
Speaker 3: Celebrate trying to get government agencies to store all this
Speaker 3: data on the.
Speaker 1: Cloud can be disseminated to whoever they want, whenever they want,
Speaker 1: for a constant total dominance and surveillance over all of mankind.
Speaker 3: Can celebrate access the more easily if it's on the cloud. Well,
Speaker 3: you want to find much information about this in the
Speaker 3: public domain, but I was able to locate this recent
Speaker 3: primo video from Celebrate where the spokesperson described what happens.
Speaker 3: One starter is remotely extracted from a phone or other
Speaker 3: device using endpoint inspector.
Speaker 9: Once that collection rights, that's the UFD file, and that's
Speaker 9: that full kind of forensic image, and that's going to
Speaker 9: go to Celebrate where we're going to actually parse out
Speaker 9: that data. So it is going to come to Celebrate
Speaker 9: Parson into the UFDR, convertict the messaging to the rsm
Speaker 9: F and then we're going to tr.
Speaker 1: Keep themselves relevant basically as also we hit the process
Speaker 1: it therefore we can't utilize our services, you know, one
Speaker 1: time or and then this is this is interesting how
Speaker 1: they keep themselves an integral part of the of the procedure.
Speaker 1: That's that's that's sneaky.
Speaker 9: Right over to relativity one in their workspace that was
Speaker 9: set up during the job collection.
Speaker 3: Now she goes on in the video to claim that
Speaker 3: Celebrate deletes all the data once it's being processed for
Speaker 3: the customer. But how do we know if this is true?
Speaker 3: It's worth mentioning that the cloud that Celebrate uses is
Speaker 3: the Amazon Web Services or aw That's horrible.
Speaker 1: That's horrible. And this goes right back to Bezos and
Speaker 1: then you start to understand once again, it's all the
Speaker 1: same people controlling your destiny, and they're all selected, high
Speaker 1: ranking cult members of this demonic cult of child sacrifice.
Speaker 1: Bezos was made, he was created, He was given unlimited
Speaker 1: funds from a from the faulty what do they call
Speaker 1: that Fiat system to fail upward and to undercut other
Speaker 1: company is to make himself number one. When you have
Speaker 1: unlimited funds, you already are the winner, right because don't
Speaker 1: you usually go into business to make money? So doesn't
Speaker 1: that usually mean that you don't have as much as
Speaker 1: you'd want already? So the companies that have more money
Speaker 1: than they would ever have been able to acquire from
Speaker 1: others because it's already unlimited. What's the point of being
Speaker 1: in business anyway, except to consolidate and you know, centralized
Speaker 1: control over certain industries, so that the demonic force that
Speaker 1: is pumping out the fake money has more access and
Speaker 1: control the people from over people and how they have
Speaker 1: the you know this, So the celebrate is using why
Speaker 1: would they pick Amazon? Why would the Israeli company pick
Speaker 1: Amazon of all places? Because it's part of their fucking
Speaker 1: network of demonic sorcery that they have over everybody, and
Speaker 1: this is their people. They're working with their people. And
Speaker 1: this is how the circle jury cancheck of money goes
Speaker 1: for AI too, where somebody's funding somebody, but they're take
Speaker 1: that money, they fund some other places to take some
Speaker 1: money and it's just round robin or you know, I
Speaker 1: feel like hot potato, and it's somehow not legal to
Speaker 1: do that so that a company can say on the report.
Speaker 1: So they get investors like, yeah, we just had invested,
Speaker 1: we just received one hundred million dollars, one hundred billion
Speaker 1: dollars in investment funds. You should you should you know
Speaker 1: invest with us and buy our stock. And then they
Speaker 1: take that money and they send it to someone else,
Speaker 1: who sends it to someone else, and there's really do
Speaker 1: we even know if the money is real?
Speaker 3: Cloud This raises concerns of its own, because, like Celebrate,
Speaker 3: AWS has close ties to the Israeli military. Specifically, AWS
Speaker 3: provides computing services, AI and other services.
Speaker 1: To Amazon is directly involved with mass murdering Gosins. The
Speaker 1: Israeli Army is using Amazon's cloud service to store surveillance
Speaker 1: information on Gaza's population while procuring further AI tools from
Speaker 1: Google and Microsoft from military purposes, and investigation reveals there you.
Speaker 7: Have it, so.
Speaker 1: We can do so. How many people knowing that are
Speaker 1: going to delete their Prime membership and pay for shipping
Speaker 1: every time they want to buy something from Amazon? Or
Speaker 1: are they going to continue to buy from Amazon? Doesn't
Speaker 1: Amazon have everything? Department stores in your neighbor could even
Speaker 1: have anything anymore? Or do they stop caring stuff because
Speaker 1: because everybody buys that type of thing online, there's other
Speaker 1: places in Amazon. But go ahead and look for someplace
Speaker 1: that has stuff that's reasonably braised. I don't know, maybe
Speaker 1: you can. But are we just as dependent on this
Speaker 1: as we are on Amazon? Should we stop that? Should
Speaker 1: we discontinue that type of behavior because we know that
Speaker 1: this Amazon is going to then order us at some
Speaker 1: point and is in the process of already collecting all
Speaker 1: of our data to do so. The end result of
Speaker 1: confiscation of your data or confiscation of your weapons has
Speaker 1: a same end result. It's not done for your benefit,
Speaker 1: it's done to your detriment. So if it's happening to
Speaker 1: you through this already and through Amazon Cloud, what happens
Speaker 1: to the Gaza, Look what happens to anybody else? They
Speaker 1: don't like They don't like us at all. They hate America,
Speaker 1: they hate Europeans. They're going to murder us, however sneakily
Speaker 1: they have to do it so it doesn't look like
Speaker 1: they're doing it in like an official capacity. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: They're still doing it. They're still going to select who's vaccine,
Speaker 1: who gets what vaccine so that they die. They're gonna
Speaker 1: select what type of you know, poison is going to
Speaker 1: be in that one based on your medical records, who
Speaker 1: you are, your identification, and then being in this digital
Speaker 1: system as to whether or not you're gonna get the
Speaker 1: poison hot shot or if you're gonna get the Oh,
Speaker 1: he can move on to the next round shot and
Speaker 1: they're not gonna be there's gonna be zero non compliance
Speaker 1: to the shot itself. It's just gonna be determined whether
Speaker 1: or not you're gonna get the death shot or not.
Speaker 1: So that's one quiet way of getting rid of people
Speaker 1: that they don't want. The other one was what I
Speaker 1: mentioned with them just sending out some fucking gang member
Speaker 1: or some somebody that that works with them, you know,
Speaker 1: through many, many levels. It's not somebody who works with
Speaker 1: the FBI. It's somebody who the FBI works with, who's
Speaker 1: a cartel member, who then has all these other little
Speaker 1: fucking shithead minions, and he tells them to go whack.
Speaker 1: That person doesn't have to be a reason they go. Like,
Speaker 1: they harass you, they gangstock you, they they tore at you,
Speaker 1: they rack your they damage your car, they damage your property.
Speaker 1: Then they kill you or your family in front of you.
Speaker 1: You know, they can do all kinds of things. And
Speaker 1: this Amazon thing, this monster needs to go. I don't
Speaker 1: think anybody could could uh assemble with enough balls and
Speaker 1: courage to do that. And we'll and we think we're
Speaker 1: going to handle this greater parasitic entity. We won't even
Speaker 1: give up us. We won't even give up Amazon. We
Speaker 1: won't even give up this thing and go back to
Speaker 1: push button phones that don't have screens that don't have cameras.
Speaker 1: You've already decided that we're going to be dead. We've
Speaker 1: already decided that our families and the people that we
Speaker 1: care about are worth less to us than convenience and technology.
Speaker 1: That it's just so, it's so alluding and interesting, these
Speaker 1: wonderful distractions that they put in front of our faces,
Speaker 1: that we will not we will not give up any
Speaker 1: of this stuff. We are the narcissists steering into the water.
Speaker 1: Even though that was poorly, poorly misunderstood and completely hijacked story.
Speaker 1: Narciss has never seen a reflection before because he was
Speaker 1: so enamored with his owner reflection that he was so
Speaker 1: enamored with his own attractiveness. That's the misconception. He was
Speaker 1: staring at something like this, and he was he couldn't
Speaker 1: stop looking, he couldn't look away. He wasn't looking at
Speaker 1: They took they took the mirror out of here. I
Speaker 1: was going to say, he wasn't looking at this, He
Speaker 1: was looking at this and he couldn't look away.
Speaker 3: Really, military under a one point two billion dollar contract
Speaker 3: known as Project Nimbers. Now I want to make clear
Speaker 3: that I'm not positively alleging that Celebrate can access all
Speaker 3: of the data that's been downloaded from our phones using
Speaker 3: its products. There's simply not enough evidence for me to
Speaker 3: make that claim, but I am saying that there's a
Speaker 3: real risk that they might be doing this, and in
Speaker 3: my opinion, that's not a risk worth taking. Okay, So
Speaker 3: now that I've just set out a very long list
Speaker 3: of concerns about Celebrating and it's use in Australia, I
Speaker 3: want to win with two main recommendations. The first is
Speaker 3: that the federal and state governments were reconsidered their relationship
Speaker 3: with Celebrate altogether.
Speaker 1: I thought he was going to say the General SAO,
Speaker 1: because I would recommend the General sell after all. That
Speaker 1: what a disappointing end. He didn't. He didn't recommend the
Speaker 1: General cell. All right, let's see what we got for
Speaker 1: talkie talks over here's my head and so there you go,
Speaker 1: Milo g ninety afternoon friends, because it's the juice the
Speaker 1: after noon, fellow truth seekers. What's up Dan and everyone
Speaker 1: that's a nuts dand hey Mike Garland, Uh he gets
Speaker 1: talked to each other. I need to pretend to do
Speaker 1: that responsible built thing. So I'll be listen things for
Speaker 1: a bit. This is my story. We all, we are
Speaker 1: all the we are all the rest is that really resistance?
Speaker 1: I remember when they stole your cat and that entire
Speaker 1: debacle it was total bs.
Speaker 7: Yep.
Speaker 1: That wasn't twenty twenty two, I think, or one. I
Speaker 1: can't remember one time I got a dog from a
Speaker 1: humane society.
Speaker 3: This is.
Speaker 1: VL nineteen seventy seven. I failed to get the raby
Speaker 1: shot in a timely manner. They sent a fucking animal
Speaker 1: cop to my house, threatened to turn to what.
Speaker 8: The dog.
Speaker 1: Had my kids, Uh, take the dog back? That's what
Speaker 1: I think that was. Had my kids crying. It was
Speaker 1: eye opening. Yep. How's that's how they can invade your
Speaker 1: world and take the loved ones away from you. When
Speaker 1: you have an animal, it's your it's part of the family.
Speaker 1: For them to say that they have to inject it
Speaker 1: with poison in order, and it's all based on a
Speaker 1: bullshit lie. What rabies? What rabies? What shot? Why do
Speaker 1: you It's it's an excuse.
Speaker 3: For they.
Speaker 1: They We can't articulate how it's a lie because there's
Speaker 1: no information out there for us to articulate it in.
Speaker 1: We can't pull and resource something that never was validated
Speaker 1: by their system because their system won't validate the truth,
Speaker 1: so it'll be untested. And and then we'll say, well,
Speaker 1: this is our my reasoning, this is this is why
Speaker 1: we this, and they'll be like, no, it isn't because
Speaker 1: we haven't.
Speaker 3: We haven't.
Speaker 1: Uh, we haven't conceded that that's that's a valid that's valid.
Speaker 1: So no, because some fucking scumbag named pasteur In, this
Speaker 1: germ theory and virus nonsense still stands to today, even
Speaker 1: though he said himself that it was false. We have
Speaker 1: to live under that lie, even if we notice the truth,
Speaker 1: and we have to subject our loved ones to what
Speaker 1: we know is poison because it can't be anything else.
Speaker 1: It can't be anything else because the other thing that
Speaker 1: they're telling you it's for is a lie. It doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: So why are we subjecting ourselves to this poison? Why
Speaker 1: are we letting our animals be subjected to this poison?
Speaker 1: When do we draw the line to say enough is enough?
Speaker 1: I think it comes to when they want to. When
Speaker 1: with this demonic child killing cult and those who represent
Speaker 1: it without knowledge that they represent it, come to your
Speaker 1: door or come to your uh, your your pediatric room
Speaker 1: at their at their practice with a needle in their
Speaker 1: hands saying that they're going to inject your child with poison.
Speaker 1: That's when you say the fuck you are, and I'll
Speaker 1: die on this sale or kill you. And then I
Speaker 1: end up moving three hours away to get out of
Speaker 1: that fucking state to protect my daughter. Rebecca told me,
Speaker 1: if I had known how many repairs I had put
Speaker 1: on that shitty van over the time that I've had it,
Speaker 1: that I would have been able to buy a brand
Speaker 1: new vehicle. Because I was driving three hours one way
Speaker 1: each time for you know, I was using some beat up,
Speaker 1: old white astro van because I was like actually six
Speaker 1: of them all together, and rather than buy something newer
Speaker 1: number one, I didn't have time to even look. I
Speaker 1: didn't have the desire to spend anything out of our savings,
Speaker 1: and I didn't want to have something super new that
Speaker 1: had a bunch of shit on it that could break,
Speaker 1: that could cause something that would normally function fine to
Speaker 1: not function because of some computer or some stupid sensor
Speaker 1: that would end up costing a shit ton of money
Speaker 1: to fix. So I didn't want a newer vehicle even
Speaker 1: back then. So I didn't get anything, and I ended
Speaker 1: up spending She said, like forty thousand dollars all together
Speaker 1: on these stupid vehicles. Could have had a nice brand
Speaker 1: new car, a vehicle van with that money and all
Speaker 1: that time, plus all the gas back and forth. But
Speaker 1: guess what my daughter was say, stayed protected. She didn't
Speaker 1: go back to that scumbag pediatrician with the freaking pointy objects.
Speaker 1: Fake it to you, bake it. Private Science of Louis
Speaker 1: Paster was very good read. Yeah, and totally should read
Speaker 1: Big Sean Propesstor by Atul Ethel Hume. You have to
Speaker 1: read that book. I have read portions of it to you.
Speaker 1: But the fraud is so freaking massive, and there's so
Speaker 1: many other things that I have been privy to you
Speaker 1: over the over the time that I have been looking
Speaker 1: into this stuff. It's it's just more reinforcement. One single
Speaker 1: book is going to do it. It's when you read
Speaker 1: or watch these documentaries or these and you read. Reading
Speaker 1: is more of a personal experience that all show the
Speaker 1: same thing. It's not just one person coming up with
Speaker 1: this conclusion. It's everybody saying that you know, in all
Speaker 1: these different places that you're finding it that this was
Speaker 1: a complete and total fraud from top to bottom. You
Speaker 1: can find information of that in virus Mania, but you
Speaker 1: should start with pay Shopper Pasture because you see at
Speaker 1: the very core of it that this was a brotherhood,
Speaker 1: Masonic bullshit, lie whatever you want if you don't want
Speaker 1: to call it Masonic. It was the cult of medicine,
Speaker 1: the cult of science that had branched away from reality
Speaker 1: already because of dominism. That we're taking people because they're
Speaker 1: part of this cult of dominance, this supremacy cult, away
Speaker 1: from truth and reality, and they were trying to form
Speaker 1: their own artificial world and construct utilizing false data so
Speaker 1: that they can make excuses for overarching overreach into people's lives,
Speaker 1: into cattle, into you know, raw milk, into animals, into
Speaker 1: every little thing that could weasel its way into your life.
Speaker 1: So the animals they were attracking, they're attacking farmers. In
Speaker 1: the beginning, they were attacking farmland. They were attacking the farmers.
Speaker 1: They were attacking their livestock and the and their product,
Speaker 1: the milk. And this was all done with intent, with
Speaker 1: funding through Rothschilds, same fucking demon. People say, oh, the
Speaker 1: Rothchild thing is like cliche. No, it really isn't it
Speaker 1: is cliche because it's overused by stupid people and the
Speaker 1: wrong areas. But they say Rothschild, people under you're talking
Speaker 1: about the top level, or at least people's perception of
Speaker 1: the top, that there's another top on top of that top.
Speaker 1: But it's close enough to where you understand, Well, if
Speaker 1: you got rid of the Bank of International Settlements, every
Speaker 1: single property that the rod childs own, and you know,
Speaker 1: meeting their homes in all countries and all the ones
Speaker 1: in Switzerland you got rid of, you got rid of
Speaker 1: you know, Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, the United Nations,
Speaker 1: all these other things. It would cripple them for a
Speaker 1: long enough time to where we could maybe live our
Speaker 1: whole lives without having them get caught back up, so
Speaker 1: that our children at least could live a normal life
Speaker 1: and push back their their agenda's uh you know, projected
Speaker 1: dates of conclusion. Why not do that? Why not why
Speaker 1: not attack the Vatican and take and take it over
Speaker 1: through storming them so that you don't wreck any of
Speaker 1: the vital information that they've stolen from the people that
Speaker 1: they may have in their vaults. And if they don't
Speaker 1: have anything, their volts fucking torch the place, it's a
Speaker 1: place of child killing. Who cares we can build something
Speaker 1: or maybe because I don't think you can extract the
Speaker 1: evil out of that out of that place. And that's
Speaker 1: you know, if you talk about the Holy Roman Empire,
Speaker 1: who's who's serving who? Is it the Rothschild Jewish banking
Speaker 1: system serving them or are they serving the Rothschild Jewish
Speaker 1: banking system, Because I would say it's a toss up.
Speaker 1: But I don't think that they were bailed out because
Speaker 1: they bought the Holy See. I think it was the
Speaker 1: Holy See as the dominant force because right when you
Speaker 1: get down to it, it's the same cult. And that cult,
Speaker 1: with their papal bulls, have already determined that they owned
Speaker 1: the world, the people and their souls, everything that's on
Speaker 1: the surface of the earth. The people themselves are property
Speaker 1: according to the Church, and they own their souls, they
Speaker 1: have their they possess your soul. So if this is
Speaker 1: all true, at least according to them in their paper bowls,
Speaker 1: it is true, then what happens with that, well, they
Speaker 1: have product property managers that they call the Jewish Banking
Speaker 1: cult or whatever what we call that, the Saturn cult,
Speaker 1: the same cult doing all of the moving and shaking
Speaker 1: and operating for them, or it's all one and the
Speaker 1: same without distinction. Maybe we don't need to make distinctions.
Speaker 1: Maybe that's another fallacy, is to make a distinction at all.
Speaker 1: In London recently, if uber eats type delivery most exclusively
Speaker 1: immigrants are delivering alcohol or anything like that, they have
Speaker 1: to request passport, driver's license type idea. Yeah, well that
Speaker 1: should already have been disclosed through the app before you
Speaker 1: place the purchase. Anyway. Yeah, that happens here though. I mean,
Speaker 1: you go to story, you buy alcohol, you just suppose
Speaker 1: to be idate. I haven't done that over eleven years.
Speaker 1: But that's Pastures notes and documents were one hundred years
Speaker 1: under disclosure. After his death Bedashan was in Paris at
Speaker 1: the Ark. I areading around that writing book. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: that's great. But if you don't know, if you don't know,
Speaker 1: if you don't know bay Shamp, you don't know the
Speaker 1: whole story. You don't know that this information was what
Speaker 1: was stolen from Beshamp in order to make Pasture look legitimate.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you that's all, like, that's all finding great
Speaker 1: bout Geeson, But what about the full story? What about
Speaker 1: the fact that there was it was already figured out
Speaker 1: the reality of how illness works and how it makes
Speaker 1: perfect sense that you could fix that and you could
Speaker 1: prevent that through nutrition. And why because signaling is what
Speaker 1: happens with the pleomorphic microzyma that actually determined what happens
Speaker 1: inside your body. So why wouldn't why wouldn't that be
Speaker 1: something that you'd want to look into. I get it
Speaker 1: that giche. Yeah, but I already know all this stuff
Speaker 1: about Pasture, and I know all of his failures. I
Speaker 1: know all of his crimes because I read Ethyl Human's book.
Speaker 1: So I don't you know, I don't want to get
Speaker 1: lost in the minutia by somebody else that I don't
Speaker 1: know who's not tested. I will read it, but it's
Speaker 1: not like it's not like it's uh gonna tell me
Speaker 1: anything I haven't already discovered through the other stuff I've
Speaker 1: read and been subjected to. I mean, every single time
Speaker 1: they've gone on a vaccine spree for some other thing,
Speaker 1: they've missed it. They've missed labeled what the cause was
Speaker 1: like with smallpox, when it's been contamination most of the
Speaker 1: time that caused people to have poisoned toxins. Try to
Speaker 1: push out through their their their epidermal there, and they
Speaker 1: say it's a virus. It's not a virus. Everybody knows that.
Speaker 1: Most people know that. So Celebrate sold phone hacking tech
Speaker 1: to repressive regimes. Data suggests Separate hacking kit is one
Speaker 1: of the most popular forensic tools on the market, capable
Speaker 1: of circummenting past codes and extracting a wealth of data
Speaker 1: from sea cell phones. US law enforcement agencies have invested
Speaker 1: heavily in the tech. Do you see that. We were
Speaker 1: just talking about Australia, but look at that. I don't
Speaker 1: know why that would be clickable in the tech, But
Speaker 1: Celebrate may have also sold it to weares, to authoritarian
Speaker 1: regimes with abysmal human rights records, such as Turkey. You
Speaker 1: mean like Kars Shemish where the fucking cult was originated.
Speaker 1: You mean like the Turkishaska Nazi because definitely not the
Speaker 1: Cappadocian type, the United Arab Emirates, and Russia. What's wrong
Speaker 1: with Russia? According to large cache of data obtained by Motherboard,
Speaker 1: this is also vice. So take it with the green
Speaker 1: of salt. Fuck you and your ads. I'd already have it, asshole,
Speaker 1: but look at it. See this is the place I
Speaker 1: applied to look at look at the This is the
Speaker 1: Pythagorean triangle right here, right next to what looks like
Speaker 1: a compass.
Speaker 3: Isn't that?
Speaker 1: Isn't that a little interesting? Does that not look like
Speaker 1: a big Masonic symbol to anybody else? Or Pythagorean? The
Speaker 1: revelations raise questions around celebrates choice of customers, whether it
Speaker 1: bets them and who cares. No, it's it's really company.
Speaker 1: They don't have a morality, dumb ass read more hacker
Speaker 1: steel nine hundred gigabytes of Celebrate data. Well, yeah, I'm
Speaker 1: sure that was totally by accident too. While products like
Speaker 1: those who Celebrate can have legitimate use in forensic acquisitions, Yeah,
Speaker 1: but who is determining what's really what's bad and what's
Speaker 1: what's a crime because they made some arbitrary law. Why
Speaker 1: are we trusting that in the first place. This is
Speaker 1: not a tool that government should have. This technology needs
Speaker 1: to all fucking go. We need to be eliminating the
Speaker 1: data centers and dealing with the fucking Oh my god,
Speaker 1: we'll be back in the nineteen nineties again with the
Speaker 1: nineteen eighty Who cares life was better back then? Who cares. Oh,
Speaker 1: let's see horrible crippling death not as convenient technology, but
Speaker 1: still plenty of technology. Horrible crippling death not as convenient technology.
Speaker 1: Global crippling death not as convenient technology. I think the
Speaker 1: real data centers are probably underground, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: places you can't find them to destroy them. I'm sure
Speaker 1: there's plenty of those down there too. Celebrate isn't asraeally
Speaker 1: firm that specializes in mobile phone forensics technology. The company's
Speaker 1: flagship product, the Universal Forensic Extractive Device, can pull SMS messages,
Speaker 1: call logs, Internet browsing histories, and in some cases, deleted
Speaker 1: data from phones in the investigators physical possession. According to
Speaker 1: a Celebrate spreadsheet, UFDs, which is Universal Forensic Constraction Device,
Speaker 1: can extract data from thousands of different models of mobile phones,
Speaker 1: including popular Android devices, supports the fucking show. By the way,
Speaker 1: a Motherboard investigation found that USA police agencies had collectively
Speaker 1: spent millions of dollars on Celebrate products because they were
Speaker 1: told to US. Federal agencies such as the FBI and
Speaker 1: Secret Service are also Celebrate customers. We live in fucking Israel. Okay,
Speaker 1: this is what this is. We were Israel, proper Israel
Speaker 1: over there is Israel satellite. We are fucking Israel, period,
Speaker 1: the end of our lives. I want to know how
Speaker 1: to extract BlackBerry. The data also contains customer support tickets
Speaker 1: with clients asking for assistance on technical issues. Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: Cares these tickers to the I don't care about the
Speaker 1: rest of this article, honestly. And this is Salvation Data Technology,
Speaker 1: leading provider of digital forensic solutions, provides one stop digital
Speaker 1: forensic solutions for signal single digital forensic tools like phones forensics. Again,
Speaker 1: see how they keep on. This is so important to
Speaker 1: their endgame that we should be throwing these out already.
Speaker 1: We should already throw these out. Honestly, we should throw
Speaker 1: these away. They should go. Data recovery means stealing it
Speaker 1: from your phone after you've deleted it and to integrated
Speaker 1: digital forensic lab. Why choose we only went through this
Speaker 1: a little bit. There's a bunch of bullshit. Now I
Speaker 1: think this is for This isn't governmental level. This is
Speaker 1: a consumer level, but also law enforcement, military and intelligence,
Speaker 1: IT and finance and labor lab constructor and blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. All right, look at that es, SIMCHAR and
Speaker 1: phone forensics navigatting the challenges of phone digital investigations SIM
Speaker 1: and phone forensics navigating blah blah, that's a good luck.
Speaker 1: Oh look there's a big thing. That's what I was
Speaker 1: just showing you on my on your credit cards on
Speaker 1: my old military ID. Even if you've had these forever,
Speaker 1: if they still have them in your possession, they need
Speaker 1: to go. They need to be far far away from
Speaker 1: you and your family, any one of these things, which
Speaker 1: means you have to get rid of your cards too,
Speaker 1: not just your phone. If you don't want to be
Speaker 1: foun that's the way you want to do it. Not
Speaker 1: to mention the fact that everything that films you from
Speaker 1: the time you leave your house is if you have
Speaker 1: one of those stupid ring cameras, then you're surveilling yourself.
Speaker 1: If you have if you have security in your home,
Speaker 1: security cameras and security audio, you're being watched by someone
Speaker 1: whom you don't know or something that you don't know
Speaker 1: at all times while you sleep. And if you have
Speaker 1: a modem with internets of Wi Fi, you're they know
Speaker 1: what room you're in at all times because they can
Speaker 1: they can tell when you're they can just like they
Speaker 1: do the point data on the face. They can do that.
Speaker 1: They know where you are. Then you walk out the door,
Speaker 1: or you walk down the street. Everybody else's ring camera
Speaker 1: knows where you are too, and so do the street lights.
Speaker 1: Good luck, good luck out there. The rise of ASIM
Speaker 1: technology has revolution utionize mobile connectivity, offering a more flexible
Speaker 1: and efficient alternative to traditional SIM cards. With eSIM embedded
Speaker 1: directly in devices, users can switch carriers digitally, which means
Speaker 1: they also can't get rid of the fucking sim card
Speaker 1: without needing a physical card. This technology is particularly prominent
Speaker 1: in modern smartphones, such as the ESTIM card iPhone series. Right,
Speaker 1: of course there'll be iPhones, and I bet you it's
Speaker 1: in or on this way too, Samsung. Soon Samsung is
Speaker 1: just the android fucking iPhone. However, this advancement introduces new
Speaker 1: challenges in end phone forensics. While simcard forensics has traditionally
Speaker 1: been crucial for extracting data like call hogs and messages,
Speaker 1: the shift to eSIM means that forensic experts must adapt
Speaker 1: their methods. Is this saying the same thing over again?
Speaker 1: ETIM stands for Subscriber Identity Module, Subscriber Identity Dream module,
Speaker 1: which is what SIM is. Okay, fair enough. It functions
Speaker 1: similarly to traditional SIM blah blah. This allows the device
Speaker 1: to be more compact, Okay when a user wants to
Speaker 1: change character, Okay, who cares? Rolls the SIN cars and
Speaker 1: EASIM cars and iPhones. So this is your old SIM
Speaker 1: card way of putting it in. You know what I'm
Speaker 1: talking about. That's the same goddamn thing that's on your
Speaker 1: credit cards that you can tap with traditional SIN card iPhones. Forensics,
Speaker 1: the digital forensics SIM cards traditional blah blah. Why are
Speaker 1: you eSIM cars being embedded within the device rather than
Speaker 1: removable pose new challenges in the world. This is how
Speaker 1: long you had to read through the same shit over
Speaker 1: and over again, repetitively in order to get to the
Speaker 1: part where they're actually gonna talk about what they said
Speaker 1: fucking fifteen feet above us. Unlike traditional SIN cards, simstore
Speaker 1: data digitally with the device itself, within the device itself,
Speaker 1: and are not physically removable. This shift to a SIM
Speaker 1: technology means it's going to be easier for them. It
Speaker 1: means that forensic aspertics can not simply pull the SIM
Speaker 1: card out of the device to access the data. Did
Speaker 1: you know that the data was STA stored on the SIM.
Speaker 1: Of course you did, right, not just not just an identifier,
Speaker 1: but also like a like an SD card in a sense,
Speaker 1: it's said investigators need specialized tools to access and extract
Speaker 1: SIM data. And this is another reason why you can't
Speaker 1: put They call it be movable storage, external storage. Just
Speaker 1: maybe they call it into an iPhone. It's all one
Speaker 1: closed system. They don't let you put a card in there.
Speaker 1: They don't let you put a Macro SD card in,
Speaker 1: so you can't expand it. If you want to buy
Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty a gig, you have to buy
Speaker 1: one hundred twenty a gig phone. You can't put a
Speaker 1: two hundred fifty six gig chip in there afterward to
Speaker 1: add more storage so that you don't have to keep
Speaker 1: it on your phone, so you can keep the lag
Speaker 1: time off your phone. You can't do it. For instance,
Speaker 1: an iPhone can store multiple Eastern profiles, enabling users to
Speaker 1: have a different phone numbers and network profiles on a
Speaker 1: single device. These profiles might include called lahdah blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: You get it. It's paying the ass for them, so
Speaker 1: they say, But it's actually going to make it easier
Speaker 1: because it's going to be granting them access because it's
Speaker 1: how it's going to software. It is gonna be built
Speaker 1: for that, and that's why the ESUM is in there
Speaker 1: in the first place. So they don't have to have
Speaker 1: a physical so they can do it remotely through cloud
Speaker 1: share and signaling it to do it remotely rather than
Speaker 1: having to have the physical device in their hand. And
Speaker 1: that's why this EASM is important to them. Advanced video
Speaker 1: detection and log analysis for smarter investigations in digital forensics,
Speaker 1: the integrity and timelessness of video evidence are crucial. Right,
Speaker 1: evidence and crime and forensics all assume that these are
Speaker 1: good guys who just want to stop bad guys. They
Speaker 1: are the bad guys. They just want to stop the
Speaker 1: good guys. Okay, that's that's the part. That's the problem.
Speaker 1: It's in the hands of the worst people who hate you,
Speaker 1: who want you dead, who want me dead, who want
Speaker 1: everybody dead. I don't want to look at that.
Speaker 7: Stick with the jacket.
Speaker 1: Okay, so real quick, since so we can get back
Speaker 1: again my website, say this is the FOD you're watching,
Speaker 1: This is my website. Click that one stop shop for
Speaker 1: my house sauces that's your temper percent off to coupon code.
Speaker 1: And then there's all the sauces down here. Do not
Speaker 1: use the coupon codes on the ones that you're getting
Speaker 1: free shipping on. You're getting free shipping on these packages
Speaker 1: ahead right up on top here or the gallon, because
Speaker 1: it all come free shipping. No additional keypounds, no additional keypoonds,
Speaker 1: no additional keypons. And if you're getting bottles and you're
Speaker 1: selecting them and you're getting like say four or five
Speaker 1: and whatever, then you use a keep on and he
Speaker 1: used a keep on. All right, there you go, And
Speaker 1: these are these are the six ounce bottles that are
Speaker 1: in the picture. There's twelve ounce bottles as well, So
Speaker 1: you get the same amount of sauce for the same
Speaker 1: weight because one is glass and glass adds a lot
Speaker 1: of weight, so you get double the amount of sauce
Speaker 1: in the same weighted container in the twelve ounce plastic one.
Speaker 1: So you're probably are not getting that one. And besides,
Speaker 1: if if the six ounce is in this particular case
Speaker 1: nine ninety nine, well it's not, and you're getting double
Speaker 1: the amount. It's not twenty ninety nine for the twelve ounce.
Speaker 1: It's sixteen ninety nine. So think about that, you're saving
Speaker 1: an additional three dollars instead of getting two six ounces,
Speaker 1: which you'll have two pounds worth of weight you would get.
Speaker 1: You know, see what I'm saying. It's it's only one
Speaker 1: bottle and you're getting double the amount that's in the
Speaker 1: six ounce into getting it for less. So that's this
Speaker 1: is how it's all set up. So in its advice
Speaker 1: is you get the large twel vance bottle. Plus it's chatterproof, right,
Speaker 1: you can get the glass bottles. Glass bottles are here
Speaker 1: for you. But I'm just saying, all right, and then,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, the venom is awesome. I love the venom.
Speaker 1: On Friday, I think I might break some of my
Speaker 1: hot sauce to the the taco stand. I'm gonna take
Speaker 1: my daughter too, because that's the next time I'm gonna
Speaker 1: ease a Friday, which means I'm probably gonna become a
Speaker 1: chain smoker. In between, so I can stop myself in
Speaker 1: mind to eat, or I just drink a lot of liquid.
Speaker 1: I need to white my teeth. I can't be doing that.
Speaker 1: All right. Get into doctor Peter Glidden's membership all bussers
Speaker 1: twenty five percent off coupon code do it you want to?
Speaker 1: And then over here's BB five for the five percent
Speaker 1: off of the actual whale products, which I also take. Okay,
Speaker 1: I take the Hopeful multivitamin. I have the full of
Speaker 1: make it. I have to buy another one. I think
Speaker 1: about my out a full of atenc blend, and that's
Speaker 1: like a the way I take it. It's ninety last
Speaker 1: nine days because I take the full eighth eighth of
Speaker 1: a ounce I'm sorry, eighth of a teaspoon. You take
Speaker 1: it sixteenth of a teaspoon in the last you six
Speaker 1: months for that much, So it's less than ten dollars
Speaker 1: a month.
Speaker 7: And I have.
Speaker 1: That at home. The whole Food Sea Complex. I'm trying
Speaker 1: to get them to take that instead the crystal stuff
Speaker 1: that they take. I've gone through my bottle of core copper.
Speaker 1: I got to get another one. So the things I'm
Speaker 1: telling you about it was I would recommend so this one,
Speaker 1: this one, and then you can scroll down add the
Speaker 1: core copper to it, and then you gotta click this twice.
Speaker 1: Not I'm gonna pay attention to this stuff today and
Speaker 1: then the IP six supreme. All right, I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: putting out my own touring and you can get this,
Speaker 1: but I think it's going to be cheaper with me.
Speaker 1: Let's see, I'll make ninety capsules. Yeah, it's gonna be
Speaker 1: one thousand milligram. I'm sorry, it's gonna be a yeah,
Speaker 1: a thousand milligram, which is one gram servings, and there's
Speaker 1: gonna be thirty servings, so it's like a thirty day
Speaker 1: supply of the touring. But I might actually mix it
Speaker 1: with somebody something else. I gotta figure it out. I
Speaker 1: might just have straight touring. Touring's got a lot of
Speaker 1: good ra benefits to it, but I already have the
Speaker 1: creatine hydrochloride out there as well, So if anybody orders it,
Speaker 1: it's just gonna be a couple days because I think
Speaker 1: I think Alex's out the last of it. There's not
Speaker 1: enough to make another one hundred serving one side have
Speaker 1: to order some more. But it only takes like two
Speaker 1: days to get here. So I have a clean source
Speaker 1: that I get it from, so it's not it doesn't
Speaker 1: have any of the bs in it, like multidecterrin or
Speaker 1: anything like that. So if you're doing keto, it's not
Speaker 1: gonna screw up your keto either, okay, okay, all right,
Speaker 1: support the show. Just stuff for your loved ones for holidays,
Speaker 1: you can even uh. I mean, I'm just saying if
Speaker 1: you spent months on here, you wouldn't get through all
Speaker 1: the information that's on here. And it's a lot to
Speaker 1: learn and take in and understand. Oh yeah, okay, I
Speaker 1: don't care about that anyway. Let me see who's over
Speaker 1: here real quick before we get back into the next video.
Speaker 1: I forgot to pull these guys up. Nothing of goodness
Speaker 1: happened though? Oh is it because non koshers? Oh, non
Speaker 1: coast result is on? Is on with Gyteppe or just Sepp?
Speaker 1: He's on with her. Hey, look there's a bunch of
Speaker 1: people on here. Look at that. Look at that. I
Speaker 1: get the same ones every time the more you notice.
Speaker 1: I like that. And jel we had to go through
Speaker 1: scanners off, so it's not good. They said that the
Speaker 1: radiation was equol Onto eating two bananas. I'll take the
Speaker 1: bananas and said, two bananas. What the hell does that mean?
Speaker 3: Though?
Speaker 1: What the hell are they doing? The bananas? Leslie faking
Speaker 1: gaytar what are you talking about? Oh? You guys are
Speaker 1: talking to each other, okay, speaking of fake and gay? Yeah,
Speaker 1: where's a where's handsome? Truth at I'll piss people off
Speaker 1: too bad. The dude's an asshole and he only he
Speaker 1: plays gay well because he is. It's just saying, where's
Speaker 1: the flock?
Speaker 3: One?
Speaker 1: What the flock? This one's about forty three minutes long,
Speaker 1: and this is already a long video here, but let's
Speaker 1: put this one in first. She said, politicians call all
Speaker 1: constituents criminals with no rate to privacy. That one's interesting,
Speaker 1: but let's go to this one first. Taxpayer funded AI
Speaker 1: sur real, It's why flocks thirty thousand cameras have to go.
Speaker 1: Let's do this one, and then we're gonna jump into
Speaker 1: some more flocking shit. Okay, all right, maybe mestap it
Speaker 1: out of the way again in the right spot mmm,
Speaker 1: because we're gonna make it smaller. Yes, all right. I
Speaker 1: just wish that I wish I could get this thing
Speaker 1: that wrapper out more so it would just be blacked
Speaker 1: out screen. That'd be so much better plaice and you
Speaker 1: can see the background. Yeah, but all right, I'm smaller,
Speaker 1: crush you smaller and smaller and smaller. I did your
Speaker 1: finger nails, ser smeller and.
Speaker 4: Smaller, having a lovely day. Welcome today's episode of you
Speaker 4: are being surveilled by AI cameras everywhere you go and
Speaker 4: you're paying for it. I'm your host Wis Rossman. Today
Speaker 4: we're gonna be discussing flock cameras. I'm not gonna call
Speaker 4: them license plate readers because I don't accept the premise
Speaker 4: of assholes. No what do I use their vocabulary when
Speaker 4: they are disingenuous and trying to convince me that I
Speaker 4: should pay them money to be able to be watched
Speaker 4: everywhere that I go. I got access to an email
Speaker 4: that I don't think was supposed to go to the
Speaker 4: person that it was sent to, and it was making
Speaker 4: arguments for why there should be AI powered surveillance cameras
Speaker 4: that are installed all over the city that we pay
Speaker 4: for that are just know.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna dig into this.
Speaker 4: I'm going to go through what these cameras are, what
Speaker 4: they're capable of, and why you should want them the
Speaker 4: fuck out of your city. This argument going back and
Speaker 4: forth is in Iowa, but I've heard the exact same
Speaker 4: shit said for these cameras getting installed virtually everywhere. It's
Speaker 4: the same line of argumentation, and I want you to
Speaker 4: tell me if you feel like it hits a nerves.
Speaker 4: Our police chief needs our support to allow licensed plate readers.
Speaker 4: The left ACLU claims it is an investtion in invasion,
Speaker 4: investion of privacy. They had a group at the last
Speaker 4: council meeting against this in a petition. I have a
Speaker 4: petition to be signed. I will be at the next
Speaker 4: council meeting. This is a great way to keep bad
Speaker 4: guys out up ooh, out ooh of our town. I
Speaker 4: appreciate any help from your friends can provide by speaking
Speaker 4: at aurn next council meeting in favor and in support
Speaker 4: of these There have been anti camera protesters who have
Speaker 4: appeared at past council meetings and the countil needs to
Speaker 4: youar pro camera citizens to come into our next council
Speaker 4: meeting to speak in support of these cameras. Here's some
Speaker 4: bullet points. These cameras are not facial recognition cameras and
Speaker 4: they only look at license plates and vehicle features.
Speaker 2: The data captured by these cameras is not used for.
Speaker 4: Immigration enforcement efforts, only for stolen vehicles or vehicles associated
Speaker 4: with persons with outstanding warrants. No law abiding citizen needs
Speaker 4: to have any concerns The protesters claimed that these cameras
Speaker 4: are an invasion of privacy the fact that they are
Speaker 4: already being tracked by facial recognition cameras every time they
Speaker 4: go to a store or get money from an ATM,
Speaker 4: or get gas. Everyone can already be tracked with their
Speaker 4: cell phone, by their computers and interactivities by technology and automobile.
Speaker 4: Protesters are not using common sense and are trying to
Speaker 4: flame fear over fact slash logic.
Speaker 10: Again.
Speaker 4: These cameras provide extra eyes to help law enforcement fight crime,
Speaker 4: find law breakers, and help keep our community safer. These
Speaker 4: cameras provide extra law enforcement without the cost of additional
Speaker 4: police officers.
Speaker 2: And if you're not breaking any laws, you have nothing.
Speaker 4: To be concerned about it and you should be thankful,
Speaker 4: thank you for your help. This is the most disingenuous
Speaker 4: pile of shit I've ever seen.
Speaker 2: It is fa really late.
Speaker 4: It's about one point thirty in the morning, So I
Speaker 4: am going to be reading the reply that I have
Speaker 4: set up that I would like to be able to
Speaker 4: read if from assets to speak at the next city
Speaker 4: council meeting.
Speaker 3: What is this thing?
Speaker 4: This is an AI surveillance camera, that's what this is.
Speaker 4: AI powered surveillance cameras that you're paying for. Why do
Speaker 4: I call it an AI powered surveillance camera instead of
Speaker 4: a license plate reader like everybody else?
Speaker 2: Good question.
Speaker 4: When you take a look at their own marketing materials
Speaker 4: on their website from flocksafety dot com, it says end
Speaker 4: I quote, no plate, no problem, capture more detailed vehicle
Speaker 4: fingerprint and flock freeform turn images into actionable evidence.
Speaker 2: No plate required.
Speaker 4: What are these capable of reading the system catalog's vehicles
Speaker 4: based on numerous distinguishing features including mank model color, bumper stickers, dens,
Speaker 4: damage pattern, roof racks, after market modifications such as wheels
Speaker 4: or spoilers, windows stickers, and even mismatching pain callers. Flock
Speaker 4: Kames' capability is and I quote unique among ALPR systems
Speaker 4: and allows law enforcement to search for vehicles based on
Speaker 4: these characteristics even without a visible plate. So if I
Speaker 4: can search for a car based on a fingerprint that's
Speaker 4: been created from it, based on its scratches, based on
Speaker 4: its bumper stickers, and everything else, that is not a
Speaker 4: license plate reader, that is an AI powered surveillance camera.
Speaker 4: When I was showing you how image works's a really
Speaker 4: cool program, you can install on your phone. I can
Speaker 4: use this with a piece of shit sealarn that's downstairs.
Speaker 4: I can search for a sports car and it will
Speaker 4: show me everywhere that there is a sports car. I
Speaker 4: can go cat in Share and it will show me
Speaker 4: every time there's been a cat in a chair. I
Speaker 4: can search for angry cat and it'll show me this.
Speaker 4: And if I search for happy cat, well, it's kind
Speaker 4: of hard to tell the difference between something being able
Speaker 4: to read a license plate or a face or the
Speaker 4: picture of a beautiful kiddie. Is the type of prompt
Speaker 4: that you use and the model that is loaded. And
Speaker 4: if I want to change the model that image is using,
Speaker 4: it's as simple as three clicks, and it's likely as
Speaker 4: simple as.
Speaker 11: That for this.
Speaker 4: It's not a license plate reader. It's an AI surveillance camera.
Speaker 4: And if we're going to have an honest conversation, we
Speaker 4: have to call them what they are. I do not
Speaker 4: accept the premise of assholes, nor do I allow them
Speaker 4: to dictate the vocabulary that I will use when describing
Speaker 4: what it is we're arguing about. If it works when
Speaker 4: there's no license plate installed in the car. It is
Speaker 4: not a fucking license plate reader. It is an AI
Speaker 4: powered surveillance camera.
Speaker 1: That's what that is.
Speaker 4: I'm going to read for you from some of the
Speaker 4: notes that I have created for myself if I have
Speaker 4: a chance to speak at the next City Council hearing.
Speaker 2: Number one.
Speaker 4: These cameras are not facial recognition and only look at
Speaker 4: license plates. The difference between an AI facial recognition camera
Speaker 4: and an AI license plate camera is one click. Facebook
Speaker 4: was for connecting with college friends and now profits off
Speaker 4: algorithms targeting teenagers who hate their self. Image Ring was
Speaker 4: a door bell that now gives police footage without a warrant.
Speaker 1: Call.
Speaker 4: This some license plate cameras highly disingenuous. Flock creates vehicle fingerprints,
Speaker 4: tracking your car's bumper stickers, dens, and modifications to the
Speaker 4: point that it can recognize your car even if it
Speaker 4: does not have the license plate. They donate to see
Speaker 4: your face. When they can identify you by the unique
Speaker 4: pattern of scratches and lopsided placement of your bumper sticker,
Speaker 4: it's like saying I'm not recording your voice, I'm just
Speaker 4: following you around and writing down everything you say, because
Speaker 4: that makes it so much better. Next, the data is
Speaker 4: not used for immigration enforcements. There are over four thousand
Speaker 4: immigration searches and flocks database. A DEA agent was caught
Speaker 4: using an Illinois Cops password to run immigration searches. Saying
Speaker 4: the data isn't used for immigration enforcement is like saying
Speaker 4: your browser history isn't used for targeted ads. Its technical
Speaker 4: against the rules, but it happens every day. The difference
Speaker 4: is when Facebook violates the terms, you see weird ads.
Speaker 4: When Flock violates theirs, families get separated and people get
Speaker 4: held at gunpoint who are not guilty of anything, which
Speaker 4: brings me to my next point here. No law abiding
Speaker 4: person needs to have any concerns. Yeah to tell Jaqueline
Speaker 4: Gonzalez about that. Jaqueline Gonzalez was a twenty one year
Speaker 4: old that was held at gunpoint with her twelve year
Speaker 4: old sister because flocks AI read a two as a seven.
Speaker 4: Tell that to the woman in Kansas whose ex husband
Speaker 4: cop tracked her over two hundred times. In October twenty
Speaker 4: twenty two, Kansas Police Lieutenant Victor Hier was arrested and
Speaker 4: later pleaded guilty to computer crimes and stalking after using
Speaker 4: flock cameras two hundred twenty eight times over four months.
Speaker 4: The track is a strange wive's movements and a separate
Speaker 4: Kansas incident Sedgwick Police Chief Lee Niguard access flock dat
Speaker 4: one hundreds to four times. The track is ex girl
Speaker 4: from before resigning and admitting to the misuse. In Espanola,
Speaker 4: New Mexico, twenty one year old Jaqueline Gonzales and her
Speaker 4: twelve year old sister were held at gunpoint in handcuffed
Speaker 4: at their flock system mistook A two four A seven
Speaker 4: on their license plate, falsely flagging their vehicle as stolen.
Speaker 4: And let's go back to the whole bullshit on the
Speaker 4: left versus right thing where the left a clu is
Speaker 4: against this in the beginning of that person's email, Let's
Speaker 4: say you're a conservative. Let's say you're a conservative in
Speaker 4: twenty twenty who lives in California and you want to
Speaker 4: go outside. Do you want Gavin Newsom having access to
Speaker 4: an aipowered surveillance system if you are a conservative in
Speaker 4: Michigan and Gretchen Whitmer tells you you can go to
Speaker 4: Aisle nine of Walmart, but not Aisle ten, do you
Speaker 4: want her having access to some shit that will send
Speaker 4: the fucking alert to her phone and the police because
Speaker 4: you decided to go to the wrong isle of Walmart
Speaker 4: that day. This is not a left or right, this
Speaker 4: is up or down. This is do you want to
Speaker 4: live in black mirror? Or do you want this shit
Speaker 4: to be canceled? I love this is one of my
Speaker 4: favorite shows on Earth, but I want that shit to
Speaker 4: be canceled in real life because I'm sick and tired
Speaker 4: of moving towards that reality and having people look at
Speaker 4: me like I'm crazy when I pointed out you're already
Speaker 4: being tracked by stores, ATMs and phones. Okay, this is
Speaker 4: so fucking disingenuous. Let's go over the stores in the
Speaker 4: ATMs one. Firstly, let's say that a store has a
Speaker 4: camera system and they can see when you walk by.
Speaker 4: Almost every store has a security camera system. This is
Speaker 4: different than having a centralized system where hundreds upon hundreds
Speaker 4: of cameras that are AI powered are all ex with
Speaker 4: just a log in and a user ID. As a
Speaker 4: cop if I want to get access to Lewis Rossman's cameras,
Speaker 4: I got to go to his store because I don't
Speaker 4: have a login and the user ID to that Lewis
Speaker 4: records his cameras to an MVR and hard drives that
Speaker 4: are on his premises. I have to have a warrant,
Speaker 4: and if I don't have a warrant, I have to
Speaker 4: have a pretty good fucking reason. If a cop walks in,
Speaker 4: he can't just say I want to stalk people, and
Speaker 4: I want to see where everybody was that had this
Speaker 4: particular type of bumper stick at at this point in time.
Speaker 4: As I could compare it to eighty other stores cameras
Speaker 4: and put them all together so that I could track
Speaker 4: where somebody went, they can't do that. They have to
Speaker 4: show up to my store, and if they don't have
Speaker 4: a warrant, they have to say, hey, I mean you
Speaker 4: know the noise that you heard around like eight am
Speaker 4: on Monday, right before a bunch of red stuff splattered
Speaker 4: on your window. Yeah, I was kind of wondering what
Speaker 4: that was. Yeah, somebody got stabbed to death. Oh my,
Speaker 4: that's horrible. And then I can give them my camera footage.
Speaker 4: That has to be a conversation back and forth, and
Speaker 4: then that has to be replicated ten or twenty or
Speaker 4: fifty times in order for him to have access to
Speaker 4: the same amount of camera footage. It's literally just enter
Speaker 4: your log in and user ID. You have access to
Speaker 4: fifty or one hundred cameras. All those fifty or one
Speaker 4: hundred cameras are then put into some AI thing so
Speaker 4: that you could find the exact piece of footage you're
Speaker 4: looking for at the.
Speaker 2: Click of the bot.
Speaker 4: I want to follow Lewis's girlfriends everywhere she went for
Speaker 4: the last ten days. I want to know every single
Speaker 4: meeting that Lewis went to and how long it lasted.
Speaker 4: You can't do that using the ATM camera. You can't
Speaker 4: do that using the HGB camera. You can't do that
Speaker 4: with the fucking four hundred dollars eBay CCTV set up
Speaker 4: that grocery stores put together or the camera on a ATM,
Speaker 4: because they're all siloed in individual locations, they all connect
Speaker 4: to different systems, and above all, they don't give the
Speaker 4: police access by default. As a result of that, there
Speaker 4: is friction, and that friction is the difference between the
Speaker 4: Fourth Amendment and living in this fucking dystopia that you
Speaker 4: could see in this Frontline documentary on China from twenty twenty.
Speaker 4: There is a difference between my store camera system the
Speaker 4: ATM camera system at a seven to eleven and an
Speaker 4: AI powered surveillance system that.
Speaker 1: No Walmart and other big major grocery department stores.
Speaker 12: They have.
Speaker 1: A centralized system on their cameras in the parking lot,
Speaker 1: so they can track you from the time that you're
Speaker 1: in the parking lot the time you leave, through all
Speaker 1: of the cameras that are on the streets, so flot
Speaker 1: cameras going all the way around your neighborhood. They can
Speaker 1: watch you if they wanted to, and put all that
Speaker 1: data together so that one camera picks up af another
Speaker 1: and do a whole stream of view uninterrupted, unbroken for
Speaker 1: the time you went to the grocery store, how long
Speaker 1: you spend in there, how many come back, what groceries
Speaker 1: you have that you put in your car, and all
Speaker 1: the other stuff too.
Speaker 4: Please have access to all from one database.
Speaker 1: The fact that I even have that matters when it
Speaker 1: comes to social credit scoring. And you know obviously the
Speaker 1: fact that if you're using a card and you can
Speaker 1: be forced to you if it's in a digital system,
Speaker 1: they know exactly what you about anyway, because that's all
Speaker 1: logged anyway, it has been for a long time. They
Speaker 1: all these little steps, all these little boiling frog steps
Speaker 1: that we call it that were coming along before the
Speaker 1: major ones, right, that are going to be the overarching
Speaker 1: Once you're already stuck in the system and you realize that,
Speaker 1: oh my god, here I am the water is boiling. Now,
Speaker 1: they're already put and put in place. So if they
Speaker 1: want to say, oh, you've been shut down because you
Speaker 1: use too much gas and you ate too much meat,
Speaker 1: they know that. They know that. There's no argument.
Speaker 4: Plaine that having access to hundreds of AI powered cameras
Speaker 4: all within one database where I can type in a
Speaker 4: basic prompt and have it show me every waste that
Speaker 4: this person went versus eighty separate CCTV systems that are old,
Speaker 4: outdated shit with no AI like do I even have
Speaker 4: to explain this?
Speaker 5: Now?
Speaker 4: With phones, a police officer that wants to stalk their
Speaker 4: ex can use flock to do that. They cannot use
Speaker 4: their Google account to do that. I have a Pixel phone.
Speaker 4: If I had linear Jos installed on my phone, I
Speaker 4: have no Google stuff on my phone. But let's say
Speaker 4: I did have Google stuff installed on my phone. Can
Speaker 4: the police just log into their Gmail account and know
Speaker 4: every place I went for the last thirty days. There's
Speaker 4: a little bit of friction there they have to go
Speaker 4: to Google with a fucking reason and all war and
Speaker 4: even if not a war.
Speaker 1: To Google's Google Mint. So they really don't need to
Speaker 1: go through too much. They just have to request, and that.
Speaker 4: Is something other than here is my log in, let
Speaker 4: me see everywhere this person went. Further, I can opp
Speaker 4: out of having Google on my phone. I can opt
Speaker 4: out of having Location on I could install Linnea JOS,
Speaker 4: I could run the battery out in my phone. I
Speaker 4: can keep my phone at home. I can't choose to
Speaker 4: not take main worlds and thoroughfares and highways throughout the
Speaker 4: city to conduct business, to go to work, to go
Speaker 4: to the hospital, to see my friends. You've made tracking mandatory,
Speaker 4: unavoidable and accessible at the click of a button. It's
Speaker 4: the difference between choosing to share your location with Google
Speaker 4: and having the government mandate I wear a collar. Protesters
Speaker 4: are not using common sense and are trying to flame.
Speaker 1: These some one of those things with the medical things
Speaker 1: they're talking about, the wristbands, those are completely unnecessary, and
Speaker 1: that's a red herring. So you chase the wrong you
Speaker 1: chase the wrong rabbit.
Speaker 4: You're suggesting that the world is so dangerous that we
Speaker 4: have to present millions of dollars of our own money
Speaker 4: to have AI follow us around everywhere that we go
Speaker 4: and report back to you. No, my friend, I'm not
Speaker 4: the one flaming fear you are. If you're that fucking
Speaker 4: afraid of going outside, how about you have a camera
Speaker 4: follow you everywhere you go or stay the fucking doors.
Speaker 4: Let's talk about common sense. Austin spent about one point
Speaker 4: two million dollars in these cameras. They scanned over one
Speaker 4: hundred million license plates. They got about one hundred and
Speaker 4: sixty five arrests. I went to a New York City
Speaker 4: par pblic school. My math ain't that good. That's about
Speaker 4: seven thousand dollars per arrest. You know what else you
Speaker 4: can buy for that amount of money, about one hundred
Speaker 4: hours of police time. Who do you think solves more crimes?
Speaker 4: A trained veteran police officer or an AI playing Where's Waldo?
Speaker 4: The numbers are right there, and they're horrible. I grew
Speaker 4: up in the nineties. I was born in the eighties.
Speaker 4: My parents used to take me around all the parks
Speaker 4: in New York City when I was a kid, even
Speaker 4: during New York City's crack epidemic. I was there for that,
Speaker 4: and it was not bad enough to justify AI surveillances
Speaker 4: to being installed. That's watching us all the time, that
Speaker 4: can profile you and follow you around and just know
Speaker 4: even that. And while Austin is not a perfect city
Speaker 4: by any stretch of the imagination, I walked around the
Speaker 4: parks here.
Speaker 2: It's not that bad.
Speaker 4: These cameras provide extra eyes to help law enforcement. No,
Speaker 4: they provide extra eyes to anybody with access. The Cedric
Speaker 4: police chief, the Kansas Police lieutenant who is stalking his
Speaker 4: ex wife. These are not helping law enforcement or fighting crime.
Speaker 4: These aren't extra eyes for law enforcement. This is a
Speaker 4: sick fox wet dream. These cameras provide law enforcement without
Speaker 4: the cost of additional officers. So they're arguing to this
Speaker 4: is fiscally sick.
Speaker 1: Fuck. We mean, anybody in that cult of supremacy.
Speaker 4: Nothing says fiscally responsible like paying twenty five hundred dollars
Speaker 4: per camera per year for a zero point zero zero
Speaker 4: zero zero one percent success right paying them.
Speaker 1: A cult of supremacy is what controls and operates our country.
Speaker 1: Just to make sure that we're still we're still cognizant
Speaker 1: of that as we go along.
Speaker 4: Here a private company to build a surveillance network that
Speaker 4: has this much potential for abuse, but these bad results
Speaker 4: is fiscally irresponsible. If you're not breaking the laws, you
Speaker 4: have nothing to be concerned about. Show me your phone, right,
Speaker 4: If you have not doing anything wrong, you have nothing
Speaker 4: to hide. Right, show me your phone and your laptop.
Speaker 4: Unlock it right now?
Speaker 1: Bring in here.
Speaker 4: If you want to install a camera in your bathroom,
Speaker 4: in your bedroom, can I watch you fuck your wife?
Speaker 4: You're not doing anything wrong, are you. I can't stand
Speaker 4: this because everybody who says this, if you have a
Speaker 4: if you're a privacy oriented person, well why do you?
Speaker 4: You don't have anything to hide?
Speaker 2: Do you?
Speaker 4: Every single time somebody says this, and I let me
Speaker 4: see your phone. For thirty seven years, I have not
Speaker 4: had a single person show me their phone, show me
Speaker 4: their computer, give me their password. Buny how that works?
Speaker 12: You know?
Speaker 4: There is this line in the Honeymooners. There was this
Speaker 4: one episode where you go this heads eye win, tails,
Speaker 4: you lose. I have Image installed on my phone and
Speaker 4: it's a really cool program where you can install your
Speaker 4: own open source AI models. You can have them on
Speaker 4: your computer. It doesn't have to connect to the Internet
Speaker 4: and it can classify your photos.
Speaker 2: It's really awesome.
Speaker 4: I could type cat on share and it finds cat
Speaker 4: on shair. If I type in borderline personality disorder, a
Speaker 4: friend of mine that has borderline personality disorder actually shows up.
Speaker 4: If I type in cancer patient, it will show me
Speaker 4: a picture of a friend of mine three months before
Speaker 4: he even knew that he had cancer. It's insanely good.
Speaker 4: When AI is good, this is a bad fucking idea.
Speaker 4: I do not want something that is so good that
Speaker 4: it can track me everywhere that I go. I do
Speaker 4: not want something that could find anybody who has a
Speaker 4: particular mental disorder, particular political viewpoint, health condition, and just
Speaker 4: be able to follow them with no accountability tails. When
Speaker 4: AI is bad, you have innocent people being held at
Speaker 4: gunpoint because it can tell the difference between a two
Speaker 4: and a seven heads AI wor the police chief can
Speaker 4: stalk his ex girlfriend tails. It doesn't work. Innocent people
Speaker 4: get held at gunpoint. Whether you think AI is good
Speaker 4: or AI is bad, I don't care. It doesn't work here.
Speaker 4: This is not a left versus right issue. This is
Speaker 4: an up versus down issue. Do you want to live
Speaker 4: in a dystopia or do you want to live in
Speaker 4: a normal society. When you look at these documentaries like
Speaker 4: the one that I'm going to link you to down below,
Speaker 4: this Frontline documentary on China and how they use AI,
Speaker 4: when you look into the way that these types of
Speaker 4: surveillance systems work, These things did not start overnight by
Speaker 4: saying we want to just watch you everywhere you go
Speaker 4: and be able to shame you if you've done something
Speaker 4: we don't like. That's not how this works. It starts
Speaker 4: by saying it's just a license plate reader. If you're
Speaker 4: not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.
Speaker 4: In spite of the fact that the thing reads everything
Speaker 4: other than the fucking license plate to be able to
Speaker 4: build a fingerprint on you, and they advertise it on
Speaker 4: their own website. This has so much potential for abuse.
Speaker 4: Not just potential, but it's been proven to be used
Speaker 4: for abuse. This is not the same as businesses having
Speaker 4: their own internal security cameras that they show the police
Speaker 4: upon request. This is the police and whoever the fuck
Speaker 4: else they give that password to being able to see
Speaker 4: every single camera and then use AI to contextualize it
Speaker 4: and say where did this person go?
Speaker 1: You know, like Palenteer or any other is really affiliated
Speaker 1: company or banking death cult company or banking death cult
Speaker 1: death cult that happens to run your country. Oh you
Speaker 1: don't want. They don't want the people that have claimed
Speaker 1: to be the the actual authority to even have this
Speaker 1: information time period.
Speaker 4: Did this person go anywhere that is a place that
Speaker 4: I would not like them to go based on my
Speaker 4: personal preferences. That's fucking weird the shit that people could
Speaker 4: do with this.
Speaker 10: No, thank you.
Speaker 4: I am not some bleeding hard person that sims for
Speaker 4: the criminal.
Speaker 7: Yes.
Speaker 4: New York City bodega owner arrested for self defense cleared
Speaker 4: in all charges. Good when there's a person breaking all
Speaker 4: the cars on our block, we ran out of the
Speaker 4: Star and we've got them ourselves.
Speaker 2: With the sticky.
Speaker 4: And it's fine, fucking piece of shit, camera battery, dead
Speaker 4: point being. I don't want this to turn into some
Speaker 4: right versus left shot or something like, oh you're.
Speaker 2: Soft on crime.
Speaker 4: I'm not soft on crime at all.
Speaker 2: If somebody breaks into my house, I'm not.
Speaker 4: One of those Why did you shoot him in the
Speaker 4: knee like he sleeps with my fish. I have no
Speaker 4: sympathy for people that go out of their way to
Speaker 4: make the world a shittyr place. At the same time,
Speaker 4: I also believe that the people who want us to
Speaker 4: live in an AI powered surveillance world all the time,
Speaker 4: just that they can feel a little bit safer are
Speaker 4: the people who are the real fear amongers, not me.
Speaker 4: I'm okay going outside even when there's not a camera
Speaker 4: following me around, and I think that you should be too.
Speaker 4: When you read about how this has been implemented in
Speaker 4: many other areas, it's one camera here and two cameras there,
Speaker 4: and before you know what, they have hundreds of cameras
Speaker 4: all over the fucking city that can be used to
Speaker 4: stalk people and track them.
Speaker 1: I want you when I jog around our neighborhood. It's
Speaker 1: raining today, so that's not going to happen. But I
Speaker 1: know each house that at least tells you because it
Speaker 1: says smile, you are being recorded as I jogged by
Speaker 1: their house.
Speaker 4: You will imagine that your worst enemy is the person
Speaker 4: who has the ability to log into this. Whether you're
Speaker 4: a liberal afraid how this is going to be used
Speaker 4: for immigration enforcement and abortion, or a conservative that wants
Speaker 4: to know what would happen if there's a repeat at
Speaker 4: twenty twenty. This is a bad idea. You don't want
Speaker 4: this shit in your city. You have to start saying no.
Speaker 2: And I want to say no.
Speaker 4: At the very beginning. I don't want to wait till
Speaker 4: these hundreds of these things all over the city. I
Speaker 4: want to say no right now. Let them know you
Speaker 4: don't want this shit in your city. You're a taxpayer
Speaker 4: and your vote counts as much as the fucking Karen
Speaker 4: that wants an AI camera following them everywhere they go.
Speaker 4: The Karen's win because they show up. Let's show up instead.
Speaker 4: That's it for today, and as always, I hope you
Speaker 4: learn something see in the next video.
Speaker 1: Good right, Yeah, well done, high paced, good energy. Like it, Hey,
Speaker 1: what's going on here? They also get info from service companies,
Speaker 1: oil changes, and mechanical repair shops. Yes, yes, and it's
Speaker 1: amazing how much of that information is. Yeah, I know
Speaker 1: that it's the juice. I know it's the juice. I
Speaker 1: think maybe you haven't been here long enough if you
Speaker 1: have to tell me that. That's pretty funny. Okay, anyway,
Speaker 1: They also get it. Yeah, and your newer cars store
Speaker 1: an awful lot of data that's completely unnecessary unless it's
Speaker 1: done for malicious purposes. There It is all right. This
Speaker 1: is a long one camera is tracking you as security nightmare.
Speaker 1: We don't have to go into the how he fights
Speaker 1: it back, but we got to learn some more stuff
Speaker 1: about this.
Speaker 2: You may remember me from this video where I told
Speaker 2: you about.
Speaker 1: You actually watched that video together recently.
Speaker 2: Forty thousand of these things that your tax dollars pay
Speaker 2: for that are tracking your every move and repurposing data
Speaker 2: collected about you every time that you drive past them.
Speaker 2: Upon further investigation, it turns out that there are over
Speaker 2: eighty thousand of them, and we got some and we
Speaker 2: hacked them. You can press a button a few times
Speaker 2: on the back of these cameras and within a few
Speaker 2: minutes turn them into your own personal spy device or
Speaker 2: malware hoster, honeypot that steals people's log in credentials, or.
Speaker 1: That doesn't sound good at all, does it.
Speaker 2: A cryptocurrency minor whatever you want really? Or alternatively, how
Speaker 2: you can point an antenna at them in to code
Speaker 2: the video screen using a technique used by the CIA
Speaker 2: during the Cold War, Or how another researcher found a
Speaker 2: Google search phrase that had the capabilities of showing you
Speaker 2: the real time location of these cameras and police patrol cars.
Speaker 2: This isn't clickbait or an exaggerated claim with no payoff.
Speaker 2: Just the other day, weeks before this video will be released,
Speaker 2: US senators and representatives drafted an official letter to open
Speaker 2: an investigation that highlights the national security risks associated with
Speaker 2: their findings. And in this video, I'm going to show
Speaker 2: you exactly how they work and even demonstrate them to journalists.
Speaker 2: And finally, we're going to take a deep data dive
Speaker 2: into the efficacy misinformation and straight.
Speaker 1: Up last Arizona in there veneo scroll and super fast.
Speaker 2: It's surrounding some private surveillance startups and we're going to
Speaker 2: use that momentum to push for protocols in legislation that
Speaker 2: actually makes you safer. Wow, that's a lot for a
Speaker 2: YouTube video.
Speaker 3: Oh, I could have interesting poison about worn roll bustling
Speaker 3: on traps, so I can be if you work for
Speaker 3: the Devil Bear Retreat.
Speaker 1: Thank god, that's agree.
Speaker 2: The meat and potatoes of this video will be mostly
Speaker 2: in parody with John gain Sex White Paper, and that's
Speaker 2: linked in the description below. Many of these vulnerabilities were
Speaker 2: recently published with the National Vulnerability Database. Or are in
Speaker 2: the process of publication, and to prevent the average viewer
Speaker 2: from getting lost or falling asleep, I'm going to keep
Speaker 2: many of the formalities and extensive details to a minimum,
Speaker 2: but if you find yourself wanting more details at any
Speaker 2: time in this video, just check the description for a
Speaker 2: whole bunch of links. Welcome to the world of responsible disclosure.
Speaker 2: And while I'm up here, let me tell you that,
Speaker 2: to the best of my knowledge, any of the cameras
Speaker 2: are hardware seen in this video were acquired legal. I
Speaker 2: have not shared or redistributed any of the data on them,
Speaker 2: and as long as they are in my possession, they
Speaker 2: will not be placed into the wild at no point
Speaker 2: in time if I knowingly accessed or interfered with any
Speaker 2: server or service related to or owned by flock Safety.
Speaker 2: There is a chance that all the devices that you
Speaker 2: see in this video, or all the devices that we
Speaker 2: have acquired from multiple different sources, are unique and do
Speaker 2: not have the same hardware or software that the devices
Speaker 2: in the wild. Half I have no idea how or
Speaker 2: why that would be the case, but it is technically
Speaker 2: a possibility. And finally, at the time of me recording this,
Speaker 2: there are forty seven security issues covered with the vast
Speaker 2: majority listed in the white paper. In this video, I'm
Speaker 2: going to be showing you six of them. Over the
Speaker 2: last summer, when doing research for my first video on
Speaker 2: this topic, I started poking around to see if anyone
Speaker 2: had done an independent audit of flock safety or related services.
Speaker 2: This naturally led me to the dark web, where I
Speaker 2: have access to some semi private communities dedicated to hacking
Speaker 2: and open source intelligence.
Speaker 1: Some of these communities have there's videos out there that
Speaker 1: says there's no such thing as a dark web. There
Speaker 1: ever has been. Maybe it's because of their fudging of
Speaker 1: what the words mean. And most people don't have access
Speaker 1: to but they would need some sort of quiding in
Speaker 1: order to get to it right.
Speaker 2: Well organized marketplaces for breached data, credentials, exploits and all
Speaker 2: that stuff. And that is where I found this. Please
Speaker 2: excuse the poor English translation, but these were law enforcement
Speaker 2: flock safety accounts for sale with escrow protection by a
Speaker 2: reputable vendor, and a few days later the listings were
Speaker 2: removed in a way that suggested that someone had bought them.
Speaker 2: Not long after that, I got in touch with the
Speaker 2: professional security researcher regarding other things on this list, and
Speaker 2: what do you know, he found something very similar on
Speaker 2: the dark web.
Speaker 12: So in the cyber industry there are things called access brokers,
Speaker 12: and some people specialize in government agencies or maybe local
Speaker 12: law enforcement.
Speaker 2: I started digging more to find out where these accounts
Speaker 2: could have come from, where they bought or stolen off
Speaker 2: of a police officer or a flock employee, or just
Speaker 2: maybe Flock Safety had some security vulnerabilities. The most significant
Speaker 2: and troublesome and mind boggling vulnerability on this list was
Speaker 2: discovered nearly a year ago.
Speaker 5: Late twenty twenty four that stumbled out our out hole
Speaker 5: and then probably a few nights later, was messing with
Speaker 5: the buttons in the dip switch and then was able
Speaker 5: to figure out how to get a shell on it.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 5: So I'm John Gainst Games professionally, I've been in the
Speaker 5: offensive security field for over a decade.
Speaker 2: Obtaining shell on a device means that you can remote
Speaker 2: control it, expilitrate data, and escalate privileges, which is exactly
Speaker 2: what John did, as detailed on John's blog and formally
Speaker 2: published paper. John had found a user named Kager on
Speaker 2: social media who was trying to recreate some of the disclosures.
Speaker 2: He reported that by merely pressing the button on a
Speaker 2: device in a particular sequence on a flock safety camera,
Speaker 2: a wireless access point is created.
Speaker 13: Hey, partner, don't do any of this stuff unless you
Speaker 13: can legally acquire a flock safety camera. If you do
Speaker 13: this to one of the eighty thousand all over the
Speaker 13: US of A, you'll be put in the clink. First
Speaker 13: thing you're going to want to do is go ahead
Speaker 13: and press the button to turn on that police camera.
Speaker 13: Then press the button on the back a number of times.
Speaker 13: I can't disclose in this video. There she is the
Speaker 13: flock wireless access point. Go on and connect, send a
Speaker 13: command to enable ADB connect, and now you can connect
Speaker 13: to the flock safety device and access its data or
Speaker 13: install whatever the hell you want on it.
Speaker 7: That fun.
Speaker 2: This, along with John's previous discoveries, are encapsulated in an
Speaker 2: easy to use tool that he made so even a
Speaker 2: novice user could obtain full control of the cameras. We
Speaker 2: let George Cheaty from The Guardian do the honors.
Speaker 5: The longest part actually is waiting for the hotspot to
Speaker 5: turn on very realistically in about five seconds, and in fact,
Speaker 5: with the qqbox. You don't need to hit the buttons
Speaker 5: because the USBC sports are spots, so you can just
Speaker 5: plug in a rubber ducky in then walk away.
Speaker 2: A rubber ducky, sometimes referred to as a bad USB,
Speaker 2: is a USB drive that a computer or device detects
Speaker 2: as a USB keyboard and then execute scripts called payloads.
Speaker 2: One can make a device like this for as little
Speaker 2: as five dollars. This quite literally raises the limit of
Speaker 2: how one could use Fox safety devices to their imagination.
Speaker 2: You can clone or decompile the apps. You could send
Speaker 2: the video screen data to a remote server. You could
Speaker 2: use it as a botnet client for malware. You could
Speaker 2: have it capture Wi Fi handshake credentials and do middleman
Speaker 2: or honeypot attacks, or replace or modify captured footage or images.
Speaker 2: And if that is the case, this could bring into
Speaker 2: question the integrity of the data being used as admissible
Speaker 2: evidence in court, like in general, unless, of course, a
Speaker 2: prosecutor could prove that a security breach wasn't detected.
Speaker 1: And it could change the data that it's my guy,
Speaker 1: so your car just any piece of footage, put your
Speaker 1: put your vehicle in the video from another video over
Speaker 1: superimposed it and make it look like to drive down
Speaker 1: that road at that particular time away from a crime
Speaker 1: or something whatever they wanted to do. Isn't that nice?
Speaker 1: And then let's not forget about the whole AI facial thing,
Speaker 1: right right, right right? Isn't this wonderful? Is this great?
Speaker 1: They can make anybody look like they've done anything about that.
Speaker 5: The apps that are installed that are custom of the
Speaker 5: vendor all have debug enabled, which on these types of devices,
Speaker 5: on interroid devices means that you can pause them and
Speaker 5: run time and modify the memory right, which gives you
Speaker 5: system injection.
Speaker 10: System can write properties, and in this case there's one does.
Speaker 1: That everybody who's like a super techy genius has some
Speaker 1: sort of like I don't know, social inadequacies or some
Speaker 1: sort of weird thing going on with them.
Speaker 2: You can modify a phoenop script that has.
Speaker 1: Ranted social awkwardness.
Speaker 5: At the very least, you can consider either a wireless
Speaker 5: arcity or get wireless arcy that goes from no access
Speaker 5: to root, which is the worst case.
Speaker 1: This means that old that guy has a hard time
Speaker 1: looking straight into things. He's looking down right way and
Speaker 1: looking very quickly like he's nervous. But sometimes cameras do
Speaker 1: that to you. But other times it's just the personalities
Speaker 1: of these types of people who are really really brilliant
Speaker 1: in certain areas, are very very socially inadequate or awkward,
Speaker 1: I should say not inadequate awkward.
Speaker 2: Socious code can be installed and executed outside of the
Speaker 2: operating system. So like when you first turn on a
Speaker 2: computer and see the bioscreen where the system does its
Speaker 2: little self check, it could exist right there, acting as
Speaker 2: a superior to Windows or iOS or whatever it is
Speaker 2: that you're booting into. Multi factor authentication or two factor
Speaker 2: authentication or two step verification is part of our daily lives.
Speaker 2: We use it when we log into everything from Gmail
Speaker 2: to TikTok to our banks, and nearly everything in between.
Speaker 2: But not all two FA is equal, and different types
Speaker 2: have their own strengths and weaknesses. For example, some two
Speaker 2: FA simply pop up on your phone or your desktop
Speaker 2: and ask you if you've just logged in from a
Speaker 2: certain device or region in which you can approve or
Speaker 2: decline the new device. This is an excellent security protocol
Speaker 2: if you're sitting at home in Kansas and see that
Speaker 2: somebody from Bangladesh just used your password. But if I'm
Speaker 2: sitting in your driveway and anss, or especially if I'm
Speaker 2: using your Wi Fi using a device like this, I
Speaker 2: can clone your Wi Fi signal and then send a
Speaker 2: deauthorization or death signal to your device's MAC address. Either
Speaker 2: you will notice this and try to reconnect, or your
Speaker 2: computer or phone will automatically reconnect, and now you'd be
Speaker 2: accessing your own network through my device. I could use
Speaker 2: a script to clone the login page of whatever credentials
Speaker 2: I'm trying to get and then feed it to you,
Speaker 2: capturing your session, and depending on the service your user
Speaker 2: name and password, then as expected, you would get a
Speaker 2: two step verification.
Speaker 1: Ember the other day, when I got the stupid message
Speaker 1: saying that someone had tried to log into my my
Speaker 1: hot my Instagram account for my business. They didn't say
Speaker 1: from where in that particular email, but it definitely had didn't,
Speaker 1: I said, sorry, you're having trouble with your password. I'm
Speaker 1: just having trogled my password. So somebody out in a
Speaker 1: van or even just remotely mimicking that they're outside of
Speaker 1: your house in a van and not necessarily have to
Speaker 1: even be there, can do this shit. This is best
Speaker 1: enough world man. I'm just saying there any time, anywhere,
Speaker 1: and if they're thats sophisticated to understand this, it's not
Speaker 1: just for your ass techies. I would be doing this
Speaker 1: to people because they're genuinely not assholes, but they might
Speaker 1: have I don't know. They're really really easily misled by
Speaker 1: quote unquote authorities because they believe in the cult of
Speaker 1: society to help them do horrible things.
Speaker 2: Asking you if you just logged in and you would
Speaker 2: say yes, granting me access. This means that when it
Speaker 2: comes to credentials like this, even with two FA or
Speaker 2: MFA a police surveillance company, security can only be as
Speaker 2: good as the least security minded person with access to
Speaker 2: that system. If you're wondering how low this security bar
Speaker 2: can go with clients, you'll be disappointed to know that
Speaker 2: flock Safety doesn't require two factor authentication with some police departments. Yes,
Speaker 2: you heard that right. The security process you go through
Speaker 2: a winning log into Disney Plus is just too much
Speaker 2: to ask some police departments to do when accessing confidential
Speaker 2: information and location of in some cases, virtually everyone.
Speaker 1: When I first found this notice how the police officer
Speaker 1: looked like he was praying to Mecca or he was
Speaker 1: a freaking israelly. Isn't it hilarious?
Speaker 2: I simply couldn't believe it.
Speaker 1: Why do police officers have facial hair?
Speaker 7: Now?
Speaker 3: What is with that?
Speaker 1: Put yourself to a goddamn standard?
Speaker 2: Could us? Senator Widens team, which is why it's among
Speaker 2: the issues leading to a request for the FDC to
Speaker 2: open an investigation into the company on the grounds of
Speaker 2: national security. Fortunately, there's a super easy solution to this,
Speaker 2: a USB or NFC authenticator. The costs as little as
Speaker 2: ten dollars and you just plug it in or wave
Speaker 2: it in front of your device for the second layer
Speaker 2: of authentication. And if this is too much hassle for
Speaker 2: an able bodied police officer or employee to use, then
Speaker 2: maybe they shouldn't have access to secure information. It's really
Speaker 2: frustrating to spend this much time talking about a problem
Speaker 2: when a very simple and common sense solution to that
Speaker 2: problem has existed since day one. A concerning amount of
Speaker 2: hard coded information is stored inside flock safety cameras, and
Speaker 2: we'll hear all about it in the next vulnerabilities on
Speaker 2: this list. But within this information is a list of
Speaker 2: Wi Fi network names. So I set up at dummy
Speaker 2: network with one of these Wi Fi names. Then, when
Speaker 2: removing the SIM card or when the device couldn't find
Speaker 2: an LTE signal, some of our flock safety cameras happily
Speaker 2: connected to the dummy network and routed upstream traffic through others,
Speaker 2: seemingly prioritized my dummy network by default, regardless of if
Speaker 2: it had a SIM card in it or not. So
Speaker 2: I captured the peak cap data being transmitted from one
Speaker 2: of these cameras for a little while and analyzed it
Speaker 2: with wireshark and on blob, which is an open source
Speaker 2: extraction suite, and sure enough, there were clear text credentials
Speaker 2: in the data. These exact vulnerabilities were originally disclosed by
Speaker 2: John in April, another in September, and with another pending.
Speaker 2: This attack requires knowing the name or credentials of the
Speaker 2: Wi Fi networks the camera is looking for. But what
Speaker 2: concerns me more is that this information wasn't in an
Speaker 2: encrypted upstream to begin with, which means that by using
Speaker 2: a professional grade SDR or IMSI catcher, which is more
Speaker 2: or less a DIY stingray device, a malicious hacker could
Speaker 2: just hijack the LTE connection and then do the exact
Speaker 2: same thing without needing to know these network names or
Speaker 2: even being physically near the camera. This could also allow
Speaker 2: a more modern version of a tempest attack, which I'll
Speaker 2: demonstrate in a few minutes. And that's where a hacker
Speaker 2: could decode the motion JPEG video stream. I actually tried
Speaker 2: to accomplish this, as I love puzzles, but unfortunately time
Speaker 2: forced me to choose between decoding the pixel sequence or
Speaker 2: finishing this video.
Speaker 3: And here we are.
Speaker 2: When I recreated John's research on these devices. As previously shown,
Speaker 2: it was as clear to me as it was to
Speaker 2: John when he first discovered it that they inadequately protected credentials, apikes, passwords,
Speaker 2: and more. As I mentioned, the game sech blog and
Speaker 2: the papers have a lot more details on this for
Speaker 2: the technically minded, but I'm going to use the segment
Speaker 2: to talk about some of the other troubling things that
Speaker 2: were found stored in the camera. On Fox Safety's website,
Speaker 2: it is stated that they do not capture or record
Speaker 2: data of people, but only vehicles. They also state that
Speaker 2: data and footage is encrypted throughout the entire life cycle
Speaker 2: and that data is automatically removed from devices after seven days.
Speaker 2: Speaking for myself. When I recreated John's research across multiple devices,
Speaker 2: I confirmed exactly what he was seeing. If Fox safetyse
Speaker 2: cameras in the wild are operating like the ones we researched,
Speaker 2: this would be a clear contradiction to their statements. Firstly,
Speaker 2: when I moved in front of the camera, the radar
Speaker 2: module triggered the camera module to take a picture of me.
Speaker 2: Then the onboard AI looked for a license plate and
Speaker 2: didn't find one, but it stored the image anyway to
Speaker 2: a separate folder. Now, this doesn't seem to target people.
Speaker 2: It will also take a picture of my hand if
Speaker 2: I move in front of the lens, or a picture
Speaker 2: of my desk if I moved the device. But what
Speaker 2: I observed were the devices intentionally saving the footage, not
Speaker 2: erasing it. Secondly, throughout the entire process of verifying John's research,
Speaker 2: I didn't crack or decrypt a single thing. Any of
Speaker 2: the information, footage, or data that you see or hear
Speaker 2: about in this video was unencrypted at runtime. And finally,
Speaker 2: when going through the files and ten folders of the
Speaker 2: Falcon cameras, we absolutely found images older than seven days.
Speaker 2: In fact, John found stored images that were captured when
Speaker 2: the camera was triggered inside the factory where the device
Speaker 2: was made. So hypothetically, this suggests that if you had
Speaker 2: a camera deployed and pointed at your front door, one
Speaker 2: could access this data and figure out when you entered
Speaker 2: or exited your house for about as long as modern
Speaker 2: search engines have existed, so as dorking. So Googling looks
Speaker 2: like this, and dorking looks like this, and if you're
Speaker 2: really well versed in dorking, you'll start finding things that
Speaker 2: weren't necessarily intended to be public. I'm a pretty solid
Speaker 2: dorker and I use it constantly for researching videos like
Speaker 2: this one. Josh, however, is a legitimate expert at dorkins.
Speaker 3: I'm Josh and Michael.
Speaker 12: I'm a technology obsessive and I found it mex it
Speaker 12: at ai, which is a all source intelligence far focusing
Speaker 12: in privacy and personal cybersecurity. This is the exact Google
Speaker 12: search I used to find an exposed flock safety demo site.
Speaker 12: If you have a system traces cars, maps, control vehicles
Speaker 12: and could soon build full investigation profiles on people. At
Speaker 12: first glance, it was a UI demo site meant to
Speaker 12: just show off how cool that buttons. Look as I
Speaker 12: look deeper, it contained five thousand lines of source code
Speaker 12: for a search platform, and buried in the code was
Speaker 12: a live API GIT.
Speaker 2: And an API stands for Application programming interface, which basically
Speaker 2: allows a computer to contact another computer without having to
Speaker 2: deal with all the clunky things like user interfaces and buttons.
Speaker 2: The confidentiality of apikeys and tokens like this are sometimes
Speaker 2: more important than things like user names and passwords, because
Speaker 2: in many cases the token alone grants through the same
Speaker 2: access but without front end security measures like capture or
Speaker 2: two step verification.
Speaker 12: And it had access to over fifty private layers that
Speaker 12: I didn't dare touch because I'm too hands in for prison.
Speaker 12: I use open source intelligence to see what data is
Speaker 12: stored an RGS. Let me show you some of the
Speaker 12: things I found, police departments and flock safety. You're storing
Speaker 12: on Rgis this flock safety map. It's obviously a demo,
Speaker 12: but it shows that they'd store registration data, so names, emails, how.
Speaker 1: Many Big Five internal cameras, twelve Well Mart, brillions of code,
Speaker 1: actor Kmart target, Starbucks Personal. Oh yeah, Starbucks app is
Speaker 1: also sharing your data with every blade too. Take it off.
Speaker 1: For fun. It's not worth it. Camera I no need,
Speaker 1: don't order ahead of time in a.
Speaker 12: Field to attach files whatever that may be.
Speaker 2: Carrollton Police Department, this is no good.
Speaker 12: The exposed apike may have bar into this access to
Speaker 12: track live patrol car locations. Also on the naughty list
Speaker 12: is a Ror Colorado or maybe flock Safety. I don't
Speaker 12: actually know who owns this map. It's flock Safety leaking.
Speaker 12: Another RGIS layer with officers names, phone numbers, emails, and
Speaker 12: even their expected to patrol areas is the worst one
Speaker 12: coming out of Dallas, Texas. A map layer with six
Speaker 12: thousand records of hot liss alerts containing license plates, the
Speaker 12: reasons why they're on that list, the exact location detected,
Speaker 12: the camera that got them, and the time that they
Speaker 12: went by. If anyone could Google find this map and
Speaker 12: trace these people's movement patterns for five months, also going
Speaker 12: to know the reason category has someone in there for
Speaker 12: just suspect and a bunch of others. Literally have no
Speaker 12: reason in our plane.
Speaker 2: So let's back it up for a second. If you
Speaker 2: you call nine one one and the dispatcher deems it
Speaker 2: an emergency requiring police. Most modern police cars have a
Speaker 2: GPS module installed that reports back to dispatch. That way
Speaker 2: they can efficiently contact the police nearest the event and
Speaker 2: expedite the response time. Flock Safety and many of its
Speaker 2: clients these third party services that make sense of this
Speaker 2: constant stream of data, and all that data is handled
Speaker 2: with an API. Just a few weeks ago, two security
Speaker 2: researchers Alexa Feminola and James Zanying wrote a report discovering
Speaker 2: that ArcGIS had been compromised by a Chinese state sponsored
Speaker 2: hacking group called Flex Typhoon. The report from Infosecurity magazine
Speaker 2: states the hackers allegedly targeted a legitimate public facing ArcGIS application.
Speaker 2: This is software that allows organizations to manage spatial data
Speaker 2: for disaster recovery, emergency management, and other critical.
Speaker 1: Function Don't you think that a lot of this time,
Speaker 1: a lot of this they're testing their own systems for
Speaker 1: how they can manipulate it so they can have plausible
Speaker 1: deniability when they want to do things that are off
Speaker 1: you know, offscript as far as what their their legal
Speaker 1: limits are, so they can have what they call bad actors.
Speaker 1: Whatever the uh oh that was that was someone else,
Speaker 1: that was some criminal, that was some hackers yeah, how
Speaker 1: did it benefit them though? What information that they receive
Speaker 1: from it, how many of those are disclosed and how
Speaker 1: many are not disclosed.
Speaker 2: This is just a very recent example of what could
Speaker 2: be compromised with sensitive API information for geospatial platforms. This
Speaker 2: is probably, in real world scenarios, the least concerning vulnerability
Speaker 2: in this video, but one of the most fascinating ones,
Speaker 2: and very few consumer or security cameras, displays, or network
Speaker 2: manufacturers have the.
Speaker 3: Means or know how to test for it.
Speaker 2: At some level. This device that you're watching this video
Speaker 2: on is leaking non ionizing electromagnetic radiation, and if the
Speaker 2: R word is unsettling, non ionizing means no DNA damage.
Speaker 2: Phones leak it. Monitors leak it, microphones leak it, camera
Speaker 2: modules leak it. Most modern electronic devices leak it. But
Speaker 2: some of these leaking electromagnetic waves are resonating and modulating
Speaker 2: in parody with the signal, and if you can isolate
Speaker 2: the resonating frequencies, you can, with a lot of trial
Speaker 2: and error, decode the signal or in other words, buy
Speaker 2: on the device. The tempest attack is something that the
Speaker 2: CIA and NSA used and experimented with ever since World
Speaker 2: War Two, which is how it got its cool sounding name.
Speaker 2: Back when we all used CRT televisions and monitors, there
Speaker 2: was generally a whole lot more RF leakage, so it
Speaker 2: was a much bigger risk to national security these days,
Speaker 2: A practical tempest attack would involve some time finding and
Speaker 2: decoding the signal, and then placing an RF bug on
Speaker 2: or near the source which could transmit the data remotely.
Speaker 2: You mean a software defined radio with a lot of
Speaker 2: bandwidth RF probes, a directional antenna and a spectrum Analyzed
Speaker 2: on the newer flock satellite cameras, I noticed that there
Speaker 2: was an unusual amount of r F leakage coming from
Speaker 2: the camera module itself, the proprietary coaxial port and the
Speaker 2: eight pin didn't port on the back. Initially, using an
Speaker 2: RF probing kit and a silloscope, a spectrum analyzer, and
Speaker 2: a hack RF, I was able to isolate a few
Speaker 2: various ranges of modulated signals. Then I brought the camera
Speaker 2: into another room to rule out localized inner appearence and
Speaker 2: tested these signals as well as common integer quotients of
Speaker 2: those frequencies. Using an RF probe, I found an exploitable
Speaker 2: leak between five hundred and ninety two and five hundred
Speaker 2: ninety four megahertz. Then, using a periodic log antenna on
Speaker 2: a twenty decipot load noise ample fire, I was able
Speaker 2: to point the RF gun it the device as far
Speaker 2: as six feet away and make out what the camera
Speaker 2: was capturing. In this case me Obviously the quality and
Speaker 2: lack of all of them off tired, but that's just
Speaker 2: because the software defined radio I was using to pick
Speaker 2: this up just didn't have the bandwidth for that kind
Speaker 2: of quality. If someone were to use.
Speaker 1: It, that's crazy that the RF he can actually see
Speaker 1: what the camera is picking up, even if it is
Speaker 1: like in a negative Is that crazy? Just from the
Speaker 1: noise he's just going like this to it, That's that's crazy.
Speaker 2: Professional grade multi channel SDR board with higher resolution sample rates,
Speaker 2: the quality of the tempest attack output can be nearly
Speaker 2: as good as its source, but due to the high
Speaker 2: cost of equipment and the knowledge and time required to
Speaker 2: execute an attack like this, most consumer device manufacturers.
Speaker 1: In order what the reality of it is that anybody
Speaker 1: with the cameras up there, anybody can access them, anybody
Speaker 1: can utilize them, anybody can have this information and It's
Speaker 1: done so most likely so that people can abuse it,
Speaker 1: so that they can have flausbile deniability. That's pretty Answerts.
Speaker 1: Gear it the cameras gear it your ring bill hearing
Speaker 1: a camera just do not.
Speaker 2: Need to be super worried about this. However, if a
Speaker 2: device is being used for something related to national security,
Speaker 2: government use, or public surveillance, this absolutely needs to be
Speaker 2: protected against. This is just my opinion here, but most
Speaker 2: of these things are entirely preventable and the result of
Speaker 2: prioritizing growth over painfully obvious industry standard security measures like
Speaker 2: multi factor authentication. Another really obvious low hanging fruit here
Speaker 2: is using mobile phone operating systems in hardware for a
Speaker 2: government surveillance camera the Falcon, the Sparrow, and likely flex
Speaker 2: LPR devices or the cameras you most commonly see all
Speaker 2: of the country. We're running Android Things eight or eight
Speaker 2: point one, which was discontinued in twenty twenty one, and
Speaker 2: that include security updates. At this time, there are over
Speaker 2: nine hundred published vulnerabilities for this OS. Like, someone please
Speaker 2: explain to me why there are even cameras in the
Speaker 2: wild recording in public activity that aren't even running on
Speaker 2: supported software. If your voner, your computer, your home security
Speaker 2: system stop being supported, and you understood how bad this
Speaker 2: could make your life, you'd probably be inclined to throw
Speaker 2: them in the garbage. The way this is supposed to
Speaker 2: work is when you discover a vulnerability, you attempt to
Speaker 2: reach out to the company, and you give them a
Speaker 2: ninety day window to release a patch. No shout out, reward, compensation,
Speaker 2: or bounty is required. However, after those ninety days pass,
Speaker 2: the discoverer can then post a detailed right. Alternatively, some
Speaker 2: go the bug bounty route, where you report it and
Speaker 2: get a monetary or reputational reward. However, as explained by
Speaker 2: John and Josh, this route has commonly started to include
Speaker 2: non disclosure agreements. This means that even if the company
Speaker 2: decides not to pay a reward, the discoverer cannot legally
Speaker 2: disclose the issue publicly.
Speaker 12: They did offer me a bug bounty, it wasn't very
Speaker 12: specific and it included an NBA. Probably knowing anything more,
Speaker 12: I don't think you're going to improve cybersecurity as a whole.
Speaker 12: They're not talking about it.
Speaker 5: Early February reached out, Yeah, I just SLOs I I
Speaker 5: remember want to say seven to twelve vulnerabilies, maybe for
Speaker 5: the LYCES flight reader and the gunjot detection. They respotted
Speaker 5: within like a day and a half and immediately asked
Speaker 5: for a video chat in which you know, I oblige
Speaker 5: you know, talking about joint PR statements and so on
Speaker 5: and so forth.
Speaker 1: Video chats. Now they know what you look like. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that wasn't the trap at all.
Speaker 5: What ended up happening was they released a PR statement
Speaker 5: about a month and a half of four to three
Speaker 5: months and an it so went pretty fairly quickly without
Speaker 5: telling me, without referencing me or referencing the issue, so
Speaker 5: that I ended up publishing.
Speaker 2: They also never gave me any confirmation that anything was fixed.
Speaker 2: There's something really unnerving about going on record with legislators
Speaker 2: or media and talking about national security. I don't fully
Speaker 2: understand what defines a threat to national security, and it
Speaker 2: seems like the type of topic where you don't want
Speaker 2: to make any mistakes. So I just didn't mention it
Speaker 2: and kept that term out of my mouth, and I
Speaker 2: just provided our research to those who could. And according
Speaker 2: to Oregon Senator Wyden and Illinois Representative Krishna mordy Well,
Speaker 2: in their.
Speaker 1: Words, flock Christna Murdy, Why the hell is he a
Speaker 1: freaking what?
Speaker 6: What?
Speaker 1: What are we doing here? Yeah? Yeah, I'm sure he
Speaker 1: has just you know, American European values in.
Speaker 2: Mind, unnecessarily exposed Americans sensitive personal data to theft by
Speaker 2: hackers and foreign spies.
Speaker 3: Did he was he?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 1: You know, he cleans up nice. I wonder if he
Speaker 1: had a little bit of a animal dung in his
Speaker 1: pockets when he goes to his meetings, you know, just
Speaker 1: so I can feel like he's at home.
Speaker 2: Part of my research was trying to figure out just
Speaker 2: how effective the adoption of block safety and similar ALPR
Speaker 2: services have been at reducing crime rates or increasing crime
Speaker 2: clearance rates. And this is a deceptively difficult task. For example,
Speaker 2: let's do what most people concerningly do these days and
Speaker 2: ask Google and let Ai answer it for us. Well, hey,
Speaker 2: there you have it. Let's maybe look at those actual sources. Though,
Speaker 2: by the way, I want to take a moment to
Speaker 2: congratulate flox Safety on their search engine optimization skills. It's
Speaker 2: so good that even services that only exist to help
Speaker 2: companies improve their SEO are like bro sorry, it's literally
Speaker 2: impossible to improve beyond early talent. This means that whenever
Speaker 2: you want to find information about flox safety or ALPRs
Speaker 2: or police cameras, flock is going to be the most
Speaker 2: prominent and influential force in your initial results, and subsequently,
Speaker 2: so will the AI assistance answer more on that healscape
Speaker 2: in future video. But hey, look some studies, let's check
Speaker 2: them out. Okay, So only two of these studies took
Speaker 2: place after flox Safety was even incorporated, and they tell
Speaker 2: us nothing about the efficacy of surveillance or data collection.
Speaker 2: Flox Safety's website claims that ten percent of all crime
Speaker 2: in America is solved using their services, which is a
Speaker 2: pretty impressive thing to brag about. However, the source that
Speaker 2: they cite this claim with was a research paper created
Speaker 2: by two flo Safety employees that doesn't really outline regional analysis.
Speaker 2: In other words, crime has been dropping nationally in America
Speaker 2: since twenty twenty one, even in the last year. The
Speaker 2: first thing that I personally would want to look for
Speaker 2: is a crime rate and clearance comparison between cities that
Speaker 2: use flock safety services and cities that do not, And
Speaker 2: when you do it that way, it's extremely difficult to
Speaker 2: find any meaningful changes related to surveillance technology in general,
Speaker 2: but there have been other studies not directly related to
Speaker 2: the surveillance industry. The National Policing Institute did a multi
Speaker 2: site evaluation and said that license plate readers can improve
Speaker 2: public safety, but the technology's impact depends on its implementation.
Speaker 2: It could just be me, but this sounds quite a
Speaker 2: bit different than what Flock CEO is saying.
Speaker 11: Over five thousand cities leverage Flock to solve north of
Speaker 11: fourteen percent of all crimes in America. But Flock's story
Speaker 11: isn't a way to story. We can now rest assured
Speaker 11: that if a crime happens in South Downtown, it will
Speaker 11: be solved.
Speaker 2: It wasn't. In twenty twenty three, the Berkeley Police Accountability
Speaker 2: Board did some data diving and found that ALPRs and
Speaker 2: other California communities were sometimes more correlated with a.
Speaker 1: I've gone through all these places in California. We have
Speaker 1: freaking frema frema. I did work on people's roofs, dealings,
Speaker 1: what do you call it?
Speaker 2: Solar paneling, increases in vehicle theft, and lower crime clearance rates.
Speaker 2: In the case of Bakersfield, California, it was only after
Speaker 2: ALPRs were installed when the city rose to have the
Speaker 2: highest motor vehicle theft rate in the United States. The
Speaker 2: board also noticed that flock Safety had claimed their services
Speaker 2: were responsible for a thirty three percent decrease in motor
Speaker 2: vehicle thefts in Backaville, California. But we're citing data from
Speaker 2: years before the cameras were even installed, which brings us
Speaker 2: to Oakland, California, and in full transparency, I'd been informally
Speaker 2: consulting with and sharing some of this research with their
Speaker 2: city council, who had just delayed a vote on a
Speaker 2: two point twenty five million dollar expansion to its flock
Speaker 2: Safety network. Flock Safety's public website claims that their services
Speaker 2: have helped Oakland's violent crime clearance rate by eleven percent.
Speaker 2: Not bad, well, actually kind of bad, because they failed
Speaker 2: to mention that violent crime decreased by nineteen percent in
Speaker 2: that period, which is on par with the FBI crime
Speaker 2: stats for the entire country. They also conveniently failed to
Speaker 2: mention that in twenty twenty three, Oakland had a violent
Speaker 2: crime clearance rate of three percent.
Speaker 1: This isn't about crime. This is about surveilling the people
Speaker 1: who don't commit crimes. Because you are the enemy. According
Speaker 1: to them, when you have a malicious force controlling your country,
Speaker 1: you are the enemy. The law abidding citizen is the
Speaker 1: one that they're at. They're not the criminals. The criminals
Speaker 1: helped them. They helped create chaos and that was.
Speaker 2: Later acknowledged as an error by the police department themselves.
Speaker 2: And this was a pretty big news story last year,
Speaker 2: and the open police Department were the ones to acknowledge
Speaker 2: and confirm the error in the first place. So how
Speaker 2: are so many cities like this failing to call bullshit
Speaker 2: on these types of claims that may result millions of
Speaker 2: tax hours being spent on these services. This is what
Speaker 2: I keep running into again and again when researching the
Speaker 2: efficacy of police.
Speaker 1: Are because it's not they were told implement this, get
Speaker 1: it passed, because this is the new world. This is
Speaker 1: the new system that's going to be taking over our world.
Speaker 1: It's already been decided. This isn't about companies and it's
Speaker 1: not about any of the It's about installing the cameras
Speaker 1: in the open air prison that is our world, that
Speaker 1: is our country for these demons who've owned our country
Speaker 1: for over one hundred and sixty years.
Speaker 2: Balanced technology a private business will cite statistics that are
Speaker 2: often misleading, and somehow nobody from these cities or police
Speaker 2: departments seem to have actually validated the information quoted in
Speaker 2: the sales pitge.
Speaker 1: You realize all these points to the surveillance of every
Speaker 1: day everyone in the new social credit system, right the disarmed,
Speaker 1: fully vaccinated, or you die of starvation because we cut
Speaker 1: you off social credit system designed by the cult of
Speaker 1: banking to eliminate all resistance to their power.
Speaker 2: So all of the society, even if we're not considering
Speaker 2: all of these questionable data sources and marketing, sociology is
Speaker 2: an incredibly chaotic field of study, one that typically requires
Speaker 2: decades of a depthly sourced data to accurately suggest whether
Speaker 2: a technology or a policy change reduces crime. For decades,
Speaker 2: we've been trying to figure out if an increase in
Speaker 2: police can even reduce crime. So at the very least,
Speaker 2: there should be an independent, robust meta analysis to figure
Speaker 2: out how effective private surveillance and data sharing is before
Speaker 2: we take money away from other resources to pay for it. Right,
Speaker 2: and without getting too philosophical here, it is worth considering
Speaker 2: for a second that catching people committing crimes is very
Speaker 2: different than total antisocial or criminal events. Like a thief
Speaker 2: or a serial killer, or a drug dealer or a
Speaker 2: drug addict is not going to see a bunch of
Speaker 2: police cameras and then just tap out from crime and
Speaker 2: become a plumber. They're just going to commit crimes in
Speaker 2: a more obfuscated way, which more often than not complicates
Speaker 2: the process of finding a reformative solution. By the way,
Speaker 2: what an exhausting amount of sociology studies have figured out
Speaker 2: over the last fifty years is that high levels of
Speaker 2: surveillance drastically decreases well being, morale, and even workplace productivity.
Speaker 2: If you think about that for a moment, it shouldn't
Speaker 2: really surprise anyone. If you have a job where you
Speaker 2: think your superiors are constantly watching you and judging your
Speaker 2: every move, you'll be concerned with appearing to be productive
Speaker 2: instead of learning and developing your skills at your natural speed.
Speaker 2: Or consider this recent study that strongly suggests that high
Speaker 2: levels of surveillance causes a steep decline in voluntary visual process,
Speaker 2: meaning that it quite literally impairs the brain's ability to
Speaker 2: process and recognize human faces. And once again, this is
Speaker 2: one of those that you hear and you're like, what,
Speaker 2: But when you think about it, it's not all that surprising.
Speaker 2: When you feel like you're in an environment where you
Speaker 2: are intrinsically not trusted, you're going to be far less
Speaker 2: likely to make friendly or meaningful social connections with others.
Speaker 2: And I'm sorry, but that just doesn't sound anything like
Speaker 2: a safe environment to me. And that's on top of
Speaker 2: an exhaustive amount of studies outlining exactly how and why
Speaker 2: increased surveillance decreases well being and mental health. But some
Speaker 2: people seemingly only read the studies conducted by companies trying
Speaker 2: to sell them something. Meet Mike Johnston, the mayor of Denver.
Speaker 2: At first, it seemed like he had the same careful
Speaker 2: agnosticism above flock safety cameras that many researchers have.
Speaker 14: Our flock cameras are shut off to every federal agency,
Speaker 14: everyone outside the state of Colorado, everyone outside the city
Speaker 14: and counting Denver, and no one can access them other
Speaker 14: than Denver Police Department officers.
Speaker 2: You could interpret all of the research that I showed
Speaker 2: you in this video however you like, but the way
Speaker 2: I interpreted it was that it technically demonstrated and proved
Speaker 2: that statement to be false. Guys, don't worry about this.
Speaker 14: Could a federal law enforcement agency use this database to
Speaker 14: track someone down on a nice hold and arrest them, No,
Speaker 14: because the system is not designed.
Speaker 3: To do that.
Speaker 2: In just over a year of data of usage of
Speaker 2: Denver's block safety services queries openly admitting to be used
Speaker 2: for immigration services amounted to over oney eight hundred. Mike
Speaker 2: even warns us of the grave dangers of cutting this
Speaker 2: data off from external communities.
Speaker 3: I want to be clear that this is a risk
Speaker 3: on public safety.
Speaker 14: If you have someone that commits a crime in Lakewood
Speaker 14: and flees into Denver, they will not be able to
Speaker 14: find that person in Denver. Now, we had a trans
Speaker 14: woman who was kidnapped and murdered, Yes, paid up in Denver,
Speaker 14: murdered and Lakewood. We solve that crime because Denver and
Speaker 14: Lakewood could talk together across the flock camera database.
Speaker 2: Except that didn't happen at all. He's referring to the
Speaker 2: death of Jax Grafton, which was not a salved murder.
Speaker 2: Jacks's mother was more than happy to speak her mind
Speaker 2: about this.
Speaker 3: I'm shocked and appalled that a public official.
Speaker 1: Oh look, look a burnt out hippie who had a
Speaker 1: trans child. Who would have thought, who would have fucking thought.
Speaker 13: Would use my daughter and claim that flock had anything
Speaker 13: to do with her being found?
Speaker 1: Because so, what do you think has more What do
Speaker 1: you think has more resistance? What do you think would
Speaker 1: spook people more? Ushering a bunch of people into trains
Speaker 1: or buildings with barboyer, do you think they would start
Speaker 1: to think that maybe they're not going to a happy,
Speaker 1: fun town or option too. Instead of pushing people into
Speaker 1: designated prisons, make the entire country one giant prison, erect
Speaker 1: the walls, put in the camera, surveillance, and while they're
Speaker 1: not even realizing what's happening around them, their entire existence
Speaker 1: is one big cage, free, free range chicken, open air
Speaker 1: prison of surveillance, a giant panopticon. Which one do you
Speaker 1: think would be noticed first being pushed against your will someplace,
Speaker 1: or have it to be erected around you. Have you
Speaker 1: ever gone to Mexico? Have you ever seen the barberer?
Speaker 1: You're moving from one prison to another, it's prison transfer.
Speaker 1: When you go to a different country on the same
Speaker 1: plot of land, you're just entering from your going from
Speaker 1: one prison to another and the more and more of
Speaker 1: these cameras are put in and their claims for its
Speaker 1: usage are being debunked by this. They're not making the connection,
Speaker 1: but we are. What's really happening here. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: new escape if they want to fudge data to incriminate,
Speaker 1: because again, if they're still going to operate in this
Speaker 1: idea of slow introduction, they're going to want the court
Speaker 1: of public opinion and public perception to support their actions
Speaker 1: against you. So they're going to make it look like
Speaker 1: you're doing something even if you're not. If they don't
Speaker 1: like you, and they're going to round up those that
Speaker 1: are most resistant of something like this, and those people
Speaker 1: will be very spooked, but the majority of the people
Speaker 1: will be hurrying that yay, because they are all a
Speaker 1: bunch of soft and retards who have transkids.
Speaker 2: Both of all this bullshit and citizen backlash, the Denversity
Speaker 2: Council overwhelmed me.
Speaker 1: Here's an idea. If you're gonna be packing something that's
Speaker 1: not expected, and you go around and try to deceive
Speaker 1: mails that you're not a male, and then they find out,
Speaker 1: and then they don't want anyone else to find out
Speaker 1: that they did, that, chances are you're gonna get murdered? Yeah? Yeah,
Speaker 1: So maybe don't lie to people. Yeah, if you're gonna
Speaker 1: be a weirdo and you're doing a doing a tuck
Speaker 1: job or a cut job, maybe you should tell people
Speaker 1: ahead of time. Hey, look, I'm a dude underneath this skirt.
Speaker 1: Can't you see the balls? You know? Tell them so
Speaker 1: they don't murder you.
Speaker 2: They voted to not renew the Flock Safety contract, and
Speaker 2: then their council letter on the issue, they went as
Speaker 2: far as calling out Flock Safeties, ethics, and credibility and
Speaker 2: I quote, we do not believe that the City and
Speaker 2: County of Denver should continue doing business with a company
Speaker 2: that has demonstrated such disregard for honesty and accountability. WHOA now,
Speaker 2: hold on before you celebrate your.
Speaker 1: Op Okay, so not Flock, but some other company that
Speaker 1: does the same exact thing. Cameras are going to go
Speaker 1: up regardless. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter, but you
Speaker 1: can have your pretend victories all the way around. Things
Speaker 1: are already up. More of will go because this isn't
Speaker 1: about any of the ship they said, it's for it's
Speaker 1: for you. And as far as accuracy or how it
Speaker 1: stops crime. They're not even being used for what they're
Speaker 1: intended for yet, so of course if you look into it,
Speaker 1: there'll be minimal results, or fudge results, or complete in
Speaker 1: total fabrications as to what they've done to help solve
Speaker 1: It's all lies, because that's not what it's for. They're
Speaker 1: slowly building the prison around us rather than push us
Speaker 1: into into penitentiary type things for re education or processing us,
Speaker 1: meaning and turning us into hamburger or sausage or wherever else.
Speaker 1: Instead of doing that that will happen to some some
Speaker 1: people for sure, don't worry about it. That's why they
Speaker 1: have warehouse stores everywhere in every town. Those will be
Speaker 1: easily converted into something that will hold people right. Whatever
Speaker 1: scare may be some sort of I don't know, an
Speaker 1: attack from of course, there must be some foreign entity,
Speaker 1: and certainly not a self attack like Northwood style that
Speaker 1: would scare people and hey, come here, refuge over here.
Speaker 1: We're gonna convert this walmart. They may even tell you
Speaker 1: right ahead, Oh wait, you can't leave now, No, it's
Speaker 1: too dangerous out there. Hey look, they just got a
Speaker 1: bunch of people in one building, and they have all
Speaker 1: kinds official recognitions. You can't get out of that place
Speaker 1: if they want, if they don't want you to, razorwire
Speaker 1: goes up on the outside. They got the military out
Speaker 1: front where you're gonna go.
Speaker 2: Renewal of faith in humanity. Mayor Mike Johnson sidestep to
Speaker 2: city Council and sign the fox Eat contract anyway, which
Speaker 2: council members are now calling a backroom deal with a
Speaker 2: known bad actor, and all of this shit happened.
Speaker 1: Joe, I would love it if it was just people
Speaker 1: who were doing this for I mean again, they're the
Speaker 1: ones who set up the system with the deception that
Speaker 1: vaccines were a good thing in the first place, the
Speaker 1: whole concept of it being completely wrong and horrible for
Speaker 1: your body. You never put an extra hole in your
Speaker 1: body to put anything in there. Oka diff It's steroids
Speaker 1: are insulin. There's got to be another way steroids will
Speaker 1: fuck y'all up, because then you don't have any free testosterone.
Speaker 1: You've got to be on TRT the rest of your
Speaker 1: life because your body won't produce it anymore. So you
Speaker 1: just made yourself have to play chemistry with yourself to
Speaker 1: your death, and you probably took fifteen twenty years off
Speaker 1: your life. Not a great idea. Not a great idea.
Speaker 1: And anybody wants to argue that, they may as well
Speaker 1: just look at stare. Let me point you to a
Speaker 1: wall and you you can yell at the wall because
Speaker 1: you're fucking wrong. Okay, you go ahead and waste the
Speaker 1: wall's time. I don't need to hear how it's a
Speaker 1: great thing to inject yourself as shit. It's stupid every
Speaker 1: way you look at it. If they just used this
Speaker 1: as like an intelligence test, like, hey, there's a big
Speaker 1: epidemic here. Everybody, come over here. We're giving off free
Speaker 1: vaccines to you if you don't want to get sick
Speaker 1: and die. And then they just whacked all those people
Speaker 1: and just like as they walked out the door, everybody
Speaker 1: know popped in the back of the head with a
Speaker 1: with a with a you know, a three to eight
Speaker 1: round or whatever, and as they just call PLoP PLoP
Speaker 1: PLoP and roll up a conveyor belt and turn into uh,
Speaker 1: you know, food your dog can eat.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 1: That would be okay with me a kind of if
Speaker 1: they weren't the ones who deceived good people into believing
Speaker 1: into that system in the first place, If they were
Speaker 1: just doing it as like an IQ test. I gotta yeah,
Speaker 1: like eugenics experiment. But they're the ones who made everybody stupid.
Speaker 1: So it's not a fair fight. It's not it's not
Speaker 1: a fair assessment of what people are capable of if
Speaker 1: you made it people into retards in the first place,
Speaker 1: or or deceive them to a point where they don't
Speaker 1: know what reality is and they believe in all your lives.
Speaker 1: You should be happier that they believed in all your lives,
Speaker 1: not kill them because of it. Like these people are malleable,
Speaker 1: may as well use them for something, right, No, they
Speaker 1: don't do that. They're gonna kill everybody, and then once
Speaker 1: the most resistant, they're gonna kill them too.
Speaker 2: Spend time for police to drive out from Columbine Valley,
Speaker 2: Colorado to knock on a woman's door in Denver with
Speaker 2: a summons, wrongfully accusing her of stealing a package off
Speaker 2: of someone's porch, and he guesses on what technology they're
Speaker 2: citing as evidence.
Speaker 10: Flock cameras.
Speaker 1: You know, we have cameras in that town, and you
Speaker 1: can't get a breath fresh air in and out of
Speaker 1: This guy is a fucking scumbag. Listen to his his
Speaker 1: been Look, I'm glad she had their camera.
Speaker 9: That place without a SnO correct.
Speaker 2: To be fair, that seems like a pretty safe prison city.
Speaker 2: While the officer refused to look at the overwhelming dash
Speaker 2: cam porch cameras.
Speaker 1: He already said, it seems like a pretty safe prison city.
Speaker 1: He's telling you without telling you, But but he did
Speaker 1: just tell you. If you're paid attention, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. This is what's happening everywhere everywhere. Denver's anywhere
Speaker 1: in Colorado to Texas is not a good place to
Speaker 1: be or Florida, which is a police date.
Speaker 2: Google maps evidence exonerating the woman. Fortunately the police chief
Speaker 2: eventually did, but this makes one ponder what's the result
Speaker 2: when this happens to a nineteen year old black dude.
Speaker 1: Or someone who doesn't yeah.
Speaker 2: Notably, this year, people in communities across the United States
Speaker 2: have been increasingly concerned about or opposed to, the rapid
Speaker 2: expansion of private surveillance in their communities. A lot of
Speaker 2: people have been noticing more and more of these little
Speaker 2: black cameras with the solar panels and just assumed that
Speaker 2: they were innocently monitoring traffic flow or maybe giving a
Speaker 2: dispatcher a better idea of who or what to send
Speaker 2: to deal with an accident. But now they're finding out
Speaker 2: what they do and what they're capable of doing, and
Speaker 2: a lot of people are just like, yeah that. And
Speaker 2: now every few days I hear about another city pushing
Speaker 2: back and deciding to take down flock safety cameras. However,
Speaker 2: in some cases a city formally deciding that they no
Speaker 2: longer want flock safety serve cameras.
Speaker 1: Somewhy are we taking to the word of uh the
Speaker 1: Silver Crown King of the Jews, Trump and his administration
Speaker 1: that ICE is just going after people who are here.
Speaker 1: I legally like they if they brought them all here,
Speaker 1: who are they actually really getting in sending out political
Speaker 1: other political u targets that they're sending out into L
Speaker 1: Salvadoran prisons without us, without our knowledge.
Speaker 2: How doesn't result in them going away after finding out
Speaker 2: that ICE was using their.
Speaker 1: Cameras, or even worse, at Brazilian prison I think between
Speaker 1: El Salvador and Brazil, I can't tell which one that
Speaker 1: would be the worst. You can ask John a Light
Speaker 1: what do he thinks of Brazilian prisons of.
Speaker 2: Their knowledge or consent. The Chicago suburb of Evanston decided
Speaker 2: that they wanted them removed, so flox Safety then reinstalled
Speaker 2: most of them. And since you can't own a flox
Speaker 2: Safety device, only lease it, the city or police department
Speaker 2: would be handling and potentially damaging private property when removing that.
Speaker 2: So now Evanston, Illinois is spending tax on legal expenses
Speaker 2: for ce city assist letters and covering the cameras with
Speaker 2: plastic sheeting to protect residents from being tracked by them.
Speaker 2: But my previous video about this topic came way too late.
Speaker 2: Organizations like Lucy Parsons Labs and Sassy South have been
Speaker 2: pushing back for years. Another great example will.
Speaker 1: For Lucy Parsons. So Jack Parsons was an occultist and
Speaker 1: Lucy is their name for Lucifer. Lucy Parsons Labs.
Speaker 2: Just saying dyman who's a software engineer who started d
Speaker 2: flock last year around.
Speaker 1: The year as in Lucy in the Sky with diamonds
Speaker 1: was Lucifer.
Speaker 15: Yes, I was taking on a road trip from Seattle
Speaker 15: to Huntsville, Alabama, and I ran into so many of
Speaker 15: these along the way, in these like really small towns.
Speaker 15: I wanted to do what most cities weren't doing, and
Speaker 15: actually tell people what these things are, where they are,
Speaker 15: and how many there are.
Speaker 2: Will is more or less simply trying to keep a
Speaker 2: map and publicly accessible record of deployed cameras. I think
Speaker 2: this is something that both local government sand flock safety
Speaker 2: should already be doing, and you probably have a hard
Speaker 2: time finding anyone who dissip agrees with that.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 15: Yeah, never gotten the season desist before. But luckily before
Speaker 15: this even happened, the eff reached out via email and
Speaker 15: just said that we needed anything. So I reached out
Speaker 15: to them, and then they were able to send a response,
Speaker 15: actually two responses, because very lawyers sent another another letter back.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you need legal you need legal protection against people
Speaker 1: who are going to just send seasons against you. Most
Speaker 1: of the season assists are complete and total bullshit. Don't
Speaker 1: get scared if you get one, Basically.
Speaker 2: Like, we don't care, we think you're wrong anyway, Flock
Speaker 2: season desist here was pertaining the trademark, which, in my opinion,
Speaker 2: seems like an absurdly frivolous way to try and bully
Speaker 2: someone to take down a website that simply provides the
Speaker 2: public with some transparency about surveillance that their tax dollars
Speaker 2: pay for. But Garrett Langley, the founder and CEO of
Speaker 2: Flox Safety, doesn't see it this way and unfortunately.
Speaker 1: Is just a figurehead. Look at this fucking as cloud.
Speaker 1: What son of what disgusting creature that alerts in the
Speaker 1: shadows is he? Because he's got to be somebody's son.
Speaker 2: There's terroristic organizations like deflock. His primary motivation is chaos.
Speaker 3: They are closer to Antifa than they are anything.
Speaker 2: Else where do you even begin with this? Firstly, if
Speaker 2: you're going to live action role play, the Dark Knight
Speaker 2: at least watched the movie up but to the point
Speaker 2: where Lucia's Fox and Batman both agreed that their mass
Speaker 2: surveillance system is grossly and ethical and intentionally destroy it. Secondly,
Speaker 2: using buzzwords like Antifa doesn't exactly invite rational or good
Speaker 2: faith discourse. You trolled this guy with legal demands and
Speaker 2: then publicly accused him of being a terrorist. But the
Speaker 2: key takeaway of this interview for me, but that's why
Speaker 2: we have a democratically elected process, right Like, we're not forcing.
Speaker 1: This fucking this guy is an anal swab. His head
Speaker 1: is a nanal. He's an anal swab, a living breathing
Speaker 1: anal swab lock on anyone.
Speaker 2: Let me make something clear. My little farm here is
Speaker 2: not exactly in a dens serb and environment. We don't
Speaker 2: even have sidewalks. I literally cannot leave my neighborhood to
Speaker 2: go get groceries or ship out of package without passing
Speaker 2: a flock camera and having my activities locked into a
Speaker 2: database that is shared to a much larger regional database.
Speaker 2: I am not allowed to know who has access to
Speaker 2: this information, and the people sharing my local information regionally
Speaker 2: or even nationally most likely do not know exactly who
Speaker 2: has access to it. I didn't sign up for flock safety.
Speaker 2: I never consented to it. I've never had an opportunity
Speaker 2: to vote for it. I do not have the option
Speaker 2: to opt out of it. And then, after researching and
Speaker 2: taking some pictures of the cameras that are constantly photographing
Speaker 2: me and seeking more information about them, I coincidentally get
Speaker 2: cops in my driveway, waking my family members up, asking
Speaker 2: weird questions and freaking my neighbors out. Now I'm shelving
Speaker 2: educational video projects to pay attorneys and constantly have to
Speaker 2: make sure someone is around to take care of my
Speaker 2: animals because every day. I'm not sure if I'm going
Speaker 2: to being detained for literally not breaking a single law.
Speaker 2: We're not forcing flock on anyone. Lacks so much perspective
Speaker 2: in this pact, but so much delusion and cognitive dissonance
Speaker 2: that even Forbes senior editor can't manage to keep a
Speaker 2: straight face through the sentence We're not forcing flock on anyone.
Speaker 3: I help you.
Speaker 13: Here just a few of the many strange events regularly
Speaker 13: happening at Bend's home and lab this month that may
Speaker 13: or may not be associated with this video.
Speaker 2: It's an idean like, what the fuck are you doing?
Speaker 3: Definitely, literally all the neighbors are freaked out.
Speaker 2: I think it's just recording video.
Speaker 3: What appeally go if I took my out.
Speaker 2: Let's just be honest for a second and state the obvious.
Speaker 2: These cameras aren't exactly a little impenetrable fortresses. They're plastic
Speaker 2: android cameras and compute boxes mounted seven feet off the
Speaker 2: ground with hose clams, and in many cases they can
Speaker 2: be found in semi rural areas where one has trouble
Speaker 2: finding a stop sign that doesn't have bullet holes in it,
Speaker 2: and there are a whole lot of people who absolutely
Speaker 2: despise these cameras. But we're being patient and we're taking
Speaker 2: the high road. We're asking our local, state, and federal
Speaker 2: governments to not throw our tax hours at a fast
Speaker 2: scaling text before adequately researching the risks and rewards, and
Speaker 2: especially before vetting the heart.
Speaker 1: You mean, before taking a saw it to the pipe. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that might be a bad idea, but maybe it's a
Speaker 1: really great idea.
Speaker 2: It depends on your perspective or in software services that
Speaker 2: are harvesting our information. It might seem like my research
Speaker 2: and videos on this topic are anti flock, and to
Speaker 2: some degree because of delusional shit like this, they are.
Speaker 2: But we also shouldn't deny that there's a long list
Speaker 2: of companies trying everything they can to take Flock Safety's
Speaker 2: place on the leaderboard. If somehow we all woke up
Speaker 2: tomorrow morning and Flock cease to exist, another startup would
Speaker 2: quickly be in their place, promising to help police self
Speaker 2: crime in exchange for taxpayer money. But you want to
Speaker 2: know what I find absolutely outrageous that over eighty thousand
Speaker 2: surveillance cameras were installed all over the country, and I'm
Speaker 2: not aware.
Speaker 1: Of a see what a great what a great way
Speaker 1: to do it. Hey, guess what you're paying for it? Right,
Speaker 1: you're paying for it, not the municipality that's decided to
Speaker 1: go for it. They don't have to come up with
Speaker 1: the money to do it.
Speaker 6: You do.
Speaker 1: For something that you don't want, that's going to do
Speaker 1: that's maliciously placed there to harm you and your family
Speaker 1: and any movement that you make, every breath you take,
Speaker 1: they'll be watching you. Oh, public Audi, it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: if you're doing anything wrong. They don't like you. Don't
Speaker 1: you understand, they hate you. They want you to die
Speaker 1: the best of the boy, kill them.
Speaker 2: Of the devices, the services, or the technology. And if
Speaker 2: there was, they would have found the exact same low
Speaker 2: hanging fruit detailed in this video. And that's the big
Speaker 2: difference here that we need to constantly be acknowledging. Your
Speaker 2: government supposedly exists to keep order, security and safety for society.
Speaker 1: Well, shit, that's what they're intended to do. That's not
Speaker 1: what they do. When they focus all of their intentions
Speaker 1: and energy inward, then it's because you're the enemy and
Speaker 1: they want to destroy you. They don't care about the
Speaker 1: outside forces. They are the outside forces. Words don't incur
Speaker 1: without money the banks. The banks are here.
Speaker 2: Safety exists to make money. They're not a charity. They're
Speaker 2: a seven point five billion dollar tech startup reportedly preparing
Speaker 2: to launch an IPO, and by far their biggest investor
Speaker 2: is indres and Horowitz. So this is pretty simple stuff.
Speaker 2: Should we trust civilian data with the company who was
Speaker 2: partially controlled and funded by Indreas and Horowitz. Well, let's see.
Speaker 2: Mark and Dreesen was a board member of Facebook during
Speaker 2: the Cambridge Analytica scandal and was one of the people
Speaker 2: on the hook for over eight billion dollars in privacy
Speaker 2: violation settlement. A sixteen Z's portfolio company Coinbase exposed sensitive
Speaker 2: information of sixty nine thousand customers. Even the A sixteen
Speaker 2: z website itself had claws allowing hackers to few sensitive
Speaker 2: information about their portfolio company.
Speaker 1: Another example of them doing that on purpose so other
Speaker 1: people can hack it, so they can get the information out,
Speaker 1: so that they can have plausible diability.
Speaker 2: Apam ah, there's so much. What else. Lend Up was
Speaker 2: shut down in twenty twenty one for repeatedly breaking the lawn,
Speaker 2: cheating its own customers. Tell us to sive their customers
Speaker 2: into thinking that they were putting their money into FDIC
Speaker 2: insurance savings. Account Wise was involved in funding hamas and
Speaker 2: pig Butcher and crypto schemes. But no, I'm sure this
Speaker 2: time it'll be fine. I'm so sure that it'll be
Speaker 2: fine that I'm not even going to look under the hood.
Speaker 2: I have an idea, and it's a pretty obvious conclusion
Speaker 2: to all of this, and I think it's an idea
Speaker 2: that anyone watching this can agree on, well, except for
Speaker 2: maybe that people invested in government surveillance. But hear me out.
Speaker 2: If a private company wants to offer services to the
Speaker 2: government that are related to national security, public surveillance, or
Speaker 2: processing data that will be used within the public justice system,
Speaker 2: they will have to pay an application fee and provide
Speaker 2: access to any hardware or software that they intend to
Speaker 2: put in public. This application fee will hire a small
Speaker 2: team of independent security researchers who are vetted and unaffiliated
Speaker 2: with the services or products that they're researching. This team
Speaker 2: will essentially do exactly what we did in this video,
Speaker 2: but with adequate resources. If problems are discovered, CPEs will
Speaker 2: be published and responsible disclosure will be followed, which would
Speaker 2: presumably help the company tighten things up without having to
Speaker 2: pay bug bounties, and if no major problems are discovered,
Speaker 2: then the company will receive a rating that will be
Speaker 2: valid for one year until they have to renew their
Speaker 2: vendor license and get a less intensive inspection. This is
Speaker 2: not too much to ask. You can't open a hair
Speaker 2: salon without a license. You can't keep on McDonald's open
Speaker 2: without a health inspection. You can't legally drive a car
Speaker 2: passed a flock safety camera without taking a routine driver's
Speaker 2: test and having a vehicle that passes basic safety requirements.
Speaker 2: This is an apolitical, common sense solution to a really
Speaker 2: big problem. I'm going to formally propose it to legislators
Speaker 2: I'm in contact with, and I think it'd be really
Speaker 2: useful if you, yeah, you wrote, emailed and called your
Speaker 2: representative senators and state attorney generals proposing.
Speaker 3: The same thing.
Speaker 2: I don't believe that humans are intrinsically right or left,
Speaker 2: but if you haven't noticed, finding objectivity in the media
Speaker 2: right now is like being a grasshopper stuck in the
Speaker 2: middle of a football field. And I'm very familiar with
Speaker 2: ground news. I've been a paying customer of the service
Speaker 2: for years It's an app and a website that collects
Speaker 2: news articles from around the world and organizes them by
Speaker 2: putting on bias, reliability, and potential car monitored by predator
Speaker 2: drones orbiting over Los Angeles, Yes, orbiting. I suppose that
Speaker 2: people could believe that the testers and it's warning them
Speaker 2: that they're being monitored by predator drones orbiting over Los Angeles. Yeah, orbiting.
Speaker 2: I suppose if people could believe that the Earth is flat,
Speaker 2: then people could believe that La is a celestial body. Okay,
Speaker 2: so I head over to ground News to see if
Speaker 2: this is even a thing, and kublam it is. Then
Speaker 2: you can see these bias filters, which you could use
Speaker 2: as a sort of political compass or am using joy
Speaker 2: ride to see how cooked we all are. I can
Speaker 2: easily see who owns the media source and then their
Speaker 2: factuality score from three different news monitoring organizations. And then
Speaker 2: if I'm feeling brave, I can use the blind spot
Speaker 2: feature to see the news stories that my own personal
Speaker 2: Internet echo chamber isn't showing me. And as usual, when
Speaker 2: I have a sponsor on this channel, any profit from
Speaker 2: that sponsorship will go to UNICEF Ukraine, Russia it's used
Speaker 2: and how they already have been.
Speaker 1: I outlined how I believe, asshole. Are you fucking serious
Speaker 1: after all that you're fucking you're we're standing for Ukraine.
Speaker 1: You're a fag too, see what I mean. Brilliant in
Speaker 1: every other way, but fucking complete retard when it comes
Speaker 1: to how they view the world. This is a this
Speaker 1: is a very common problem with people. Fuck Ukraine, they're
Speaker 1: not getting enough. They're not getting enough because we're funneling
Speaker 1: money into them so they can fight a wark against
Speaker 1: Russia on our behalf. Fuck them, Fuck them.
Speaker 2: Easily violated.
Speaker 1: They're pulling people out of fucking cars, parents separated from
Speaker 1: their children, children going god knows where, while they send
Speaker 1: the fucking father to the front lines. Are you your
Speaker 1: fucking mind, you piece of fucking worthless shit? What the
Speaker 1: fuck is wrong with you, fucking fag? Get your head
Speaker 1: out of your fucking ass. Use the same fucking you
Speaker 1: know discernment that you use on all those other shit
Speaker 1: to not do stupid shit like that and then tell
Speaker 1: people about it. Don't buy that fucking whatever that thing is,
Speaker 1: because it's going to fucking Ukraine.
Speaker 2: American's Fourth Amendment right, And here is some feel good
Speaker 2: information that you probably don't get to hear much of
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty five. This is a completely non partisan issue.
Speaker 2: One could use this type of surveillance to track people
Speaker 2: that ICE intends to capture or report.
Speaker 1: Or you can already tell the anti ICE it's sentimented
Speaker 1: in him, and I was trying to be quiet about
Speaker 1: it so we could get to the detailed part of it.
Speaker 1: But now now it's all out in the open, he's
Speaker 1: a fucking loser.
Speaker 2: One could use this type of surveillance to track ICE
Speaker 2: to sabotage and warn people about raids. It could be
Speaker 2: used to track a woman leaving her state to get
Speaker 2: an abortion. It can also be used to track someone Those.
Speaker 1: Are all bad things, right, being another hero, illegal or
Speaker 1: murdering a baby. So far, so good, And not that
Speaker 1: I agree with anything that Trump has anything to do with,
Speaker 1: but I don't see these being good examples.
Speaker 2: Driving around during a lockdown during a pandemic. There is
Speaker 2: no civilian anywhere who is always one hundred percent aligned
Speaker 2: with their government throughout their entire life. If mass surveillance sells.
Speaker 1: Or felonies a day, good to you today, then.
Speaker 2: It probably wouldn't have sounded good to you five years ago,
Speaker 2: and I guarantee you that it won't sound good to
Speaker 2: you at some point in the future. This isn't a
Speaker 2: right verse left thing, or a republican versus democrat thing,
Speaker 2: or an empathy.
Speaker 1: Versus tell people at all that you want jig thing.
Speaker 2: It's an authoritarian verse individual thing. Privacy is a form
Speaker 2: of power that increases your control over your own destiny.
Speaker 2: And right now you're at a junction where you're made
Speaker 2: to be so scared of your neighbors that you might
Speaker 2: be willing to give up that power. Or you can
Speaker 2: simply say no, I've refused to pay for my every
Speaker 2: movement to be tracked by my government through a for
Speaker 2: profit company that hasn't even been adequately vetted to protect
Speaker 2: my security. But for this to stop, you need to
Speaker 2: use your voice and you need to get involved. There
Speaker 2: are links in the description to show you exactly how
Speaker 2: to do that.
Speaker 1: Right, So more shit, Okay, it was It was a
Speaker 1: long It was It was a dramatic black pause. Is
Speaker 1: that what we just did?
Speaker 2: It was by far the most time consuming, impactful, expensive
Speaker 2: and collaborative product I've done on this channel or with
Speaker 2: this nonprofit. Obviously, it would have not been possible without
Speaker 2: John gainsah.
Speaker 1: Blah blah blh. Okay, this is just a my asshole
Speaker 1: section of it. All right, Well that's I think we've
Speaker 1: been on here way too long. Yes we have, Okay,
Speaker 1: so support the Dad damn Show and then we'll be
Speaker 1: on the way. You're over on FTJ. There's an easy
Speaker 1: quick way to do it there where you should go
Speaker 1: and click one of these links. So you go here.
Speaker 1: It's great to be nowhere. That's cool. Yeah, the vet
Speaker 1: is full of uh. I had just had this conversation
Speaker 1: with somebody the other day. Oh yeah, the wild horses thing,
Speaker 1: all right, murdering wild horses babies not too far away
Speaker 1: from some of the other places. I wasn't go like there. Yeah, anyway,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. Oh right, get doctor Monzo's Whole Food
Speaker 1: Supplements for your ninety essentral vitalizing nutrients here. It's also
Speaker 1: you get the HOS sauce and yea yeah yeah. Doctor
Speaker 1: John h joined doctor Glynnon's membership site. You'll be here tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Make it worth his time, because honestly, if you're not
Speaker 1: getting it, you shouldn't even be watching it. I mean,
Speaker 1: you should be getting the concepts and understanding why it's important,
Speaker 1: why it's vital information. You've gone through four years of hell,
Speaker 1: five enough to expose what the hell this cult is
Speaker 1: and what they're trying to do to you. It wasn't
Speaker 1: a governmental thing. It's an allopathy thing. That's the first
Speaker 1: trick and first live that they had to tell you
Speaker 1: first and get you to believe, so that all the
Speaker 1: other lives could be buried, burying you on top of
Speaker 1: you know, buried on top of you. So that's a
Speaker 1: we are here, this is where we're at. We need
Speaker 1: to walk away from the system, completely detach ourselves from it.
Speaker 1: There's no saving it. There's no switching out faces. Oh
Speaker 1: let's have an RFK instead of this, And then no,
Speaker 1: they're all promoting the same shit, just with different faces
Speaker 1: that are more trustworthy. Oh well, then there you go.
Speaker 1: The system gets preserved and the lies continue. But now
Speaker 1: it's a cult of personality situation where that got well,
Speaker 1: this one certainly wouldn't do.
Speaker 7: That to us.
Speaker 1: Okay, see how you do that? You highlight, you hit
Speaker 1: right click, you hit copy. Then you don't even have
Speaker 1: to do that. Actually, you can just go here if
Speaker 1: you can't remember three letters and two letters and a number.
Speaker 1: It's right here for you anyway. So Azure oil products
Speaker 1: use code BB five for five percent off. If you
Speaker 1: guys are bouncing now, this is the most important part
Speaker 1: of the show because this is you getting healthier wholefood
Speaker 1: with multi vetom and whole food is what makes the difference.
Speaker 3: And you go in here.
Speaker 1: And it says Azure will's hopefully multiveum is highly potent.
Speaker 1: There's a high potency formulation of essential vitamins packed with
Speaker 1: a variety of trace minerals. Trace minerals are also in here.
Speaker 1: It provides immune support, amplifies energy, bolster's cognitive health, I've
Speaker 1: cat hair on my face, strengthen's bones, and nurtures gut balance.
Speaker 1: This formulation is derived exclusively from organic book tanicals, synthetic free,
Speaker 1: gluten free and vegan. This is a plant based nutrition
Speaker 1: for the whole family design for daily use. This formulation
Speaker 1: delivers essential nutrients without non nutritive additives, without non nutritive
Speaker 1: additives or preservatives. This is very inexpensive for what you're
Speaker 1: getting from it, and it's forty two dollars less than
Speaker 1: the TENU tantry. Immune support, energy support, thinking and condition
Speaker 1: bone factors and calcium, so microbiome essentials, trace minerals, emotional stability,
Speaker 1: heart health, liver support, and nerve and blood cell support.
Speaker 1: Now let's go down to where the proprietary blends are.
Speaker 1: Are they at didropass them? Are they listed that way? Yeah?
Speaker 1: So there's a botanical blend, there's immune blend, and there's
Speaker 1: an organic fermented greens blend. In addition to all this
Speaker 1: holding magnesium, not a lot of magnesium, but it's from
Speaker 1: when you have them from a whole food sources. You
Speaker 1: don't need as much seleniums in their copper a little bit,
Speaker 1: but you need more copper than that. But it's a
Speaker 1: get start. At least you get some on full of acumic.
Speaker 1: Would add more of the minerals. Okay, this and this
Speaker 1: so far one and two. Boom full of acumic. Get
Speaker 1: this one. It's worth it's a it's a This is
Speaker 1: a ninety to one hundred and eighty days supply, depending
Speaker 1: on how much you use. Person serving supports, gut health
Speaker 1: strengths and immune functions supports nutrients wort should optimize a
Speaker 1: cellular function. See about all these things and see how
Speaker 1: it affects your health. For the first ninety for ninety
Speaker 1: days first. Now that doesn't mean stop at ninety days.
Speaker 1: It means then reis evaluate whether or not the ailments
Speaker 1: that you had may have been just deficiencies because they've
Speaker 1: faded away, or whether or not you also need another
Speaker 1: homeopathic to go with it, which is where you'll go
Speaker 1: to doctor Glidden and ask him by telling him your symptoms,
Speaker 1: and you can do that on his membership Tuesdays and
Speaker 1: Thursdays and Wednesday's on our show, or you can get
Speaker 1: a private appointment with him. If you were told you
Speaker 1: had the big C word, which you probably hopefully hadn't
Speaker 1: been told that, but you might be suspicious that you
Speaker 1: have like a bomb or something. Instead of going to
Speaker 1: the butchers who will force you into certain things or
Speaker 1: cut off certain abilities for you to you know, or
Speaker 1: if you think it's one of your children that are sick,
Speaker 1: maybe you should go to doctor Glynn first and get
Speaker 1: a private appointment, find sign up for his membership, Save
Speaker 1: your children, save yourself for collegs sake from the same.
Speaker 1: My aunt murdered, okay murdered, my little brother murdered, my
Speaker 1: grandmother murdered, my grandfather murdered, slowly over time, statins, fucking dialysis,
Speaker 1: all things that weren't necessary. He could have cleaned out
Speaker 1: his fucking kidneys. And plus he had the emotional stress
Speaker 1: that ruined his health of my aunt dying that they
Speaker 1: murdered first. That's same thing that killed my grandmother, that
Speaker 1: type of stress. This is what happens to families. I'm
Speaker 1: one fucking person telling you my story. Think of everybody else,
Speaker 1: Think of your own.
Speaker 2: Have you been?
Speaker 1: Have you It's not whether or not it's happened to you,
Speaker 1: it's whether or not you've recognized it for what it is,
Speaker 1: because it has happened. So whole food, multi vedmin full
Speaker 1: vi achumic blend core copper get this assist cellular energy
Speaker 1: production facilitates our imtallibilism, bolsters and the anti accidant defense systems.
Speaker 1: A's and most of the people's diets have a bunch
Speaker 1: of free radicals and oxidative stress that it goes into
Speaker 1: your system. Oxidation, the way you cook, if you cook
Speaker 1: with the oils instead of butter, all these things add up.
Speaker 1: If you're leading deep fried food, ever, if you're doing
Speaker 1: any type of thing, there's all kinds of ox A
Speaker 1: day of stress from various things. Seed oils, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: If they're cold, doesn't matter. If they're in a salad,
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. If they're canola oil inside of your if
Speaker 1: you're salad dressing, it doesn't matter. So get the antioxidants
Speaker 1: that you need. Get the whole food multi vitamin, the
Speaker 1: full vacumic acid, get this core copper. And then the
Speaker 1: last one is the IP six Supreme. You have to
Speaker 1: click at least I like it. With the way Mind's
Speaker 1: set up, you have to click this twice and then bam,
Speaker 1: there it is IP six Supreme. And this is the
Speaker 1: powdered version. That's probably where you want to start. You
Speaker 1: probably don't want to take a bunch of like eight
Speaker 1: pills at a time. Just get the get the powdered version.
Speaker 1: It's like one scoop. It's way easier.
Speaker 3: Then.
Speaker 1: And let me just show you that the go down
Speaker 1: good dune rapid absorption DNA integrity. I see this in
Speaker 1: turn exerts significant benefits to the support of the immune system,
Speaker 1: DNA integrity and kidney function, removal of unbound iron, antiaccidant
Speaker 1: support glucose geez. I wish I would have got like
Speaker 1: grapha of that too, and in addition to the good
Speaker 1: IRBs that doctor Glidden had recommended that my mother never
Speaker 1: got for him, antiaccient support, glucose metabolism, muric acid, balanced
Speaker 1: cardiovasco of health and healthy bones and teeth. IP six
Speaker 1: and an acetl is a precise ratio in a precise
Speaker 1: ratio is more effective than IP six alone. The ability
Speaker 1: regularly ironed in the body and can have implications for
Speaker 1: various physiological processes. Considering that iron is essential for numerous
Speaker 1: cillular functions, iron and copper have a relationship. Too much
Speaker 1: to the one will happen if there's not enough of
Speaker 1: ye others. If there's not enough copper, you'll get a
Speaker 1: build up of iron, and it'll be stored in your tissues,
Speaker 1: and you'll have bone and joint pain, and you'll have
Speaker 1: oxidative stress. However, excess iron can be a prooxidative and harmful. Thus,
Speaker 1: the iron keylating property of IP six may have protective
Speaker 1: effects where iron driven oxidative damage is a concern. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you get it all right, Now, you got it, and
Speaker 1: then we're good, code BB five, get it, get the
Speaker 1: discount b B five. It only helps doctor Bonzo and
Speaker 1: myself if you use the code, otherwise it bypasses us
Speaker 1: and Azrael doesn't recognize that it came from the source.
Speaker 1: So you have to use code BB five at the
Speaker 1: checkout b B five broh bro five b B five
Speaker 1: at the checkout, and you'll get five percent off. That's
Speaker 1: your incentive. Hooray. Okay. You know about my awesome hot sauce,
Speaker 1: literally named of it because that's what it is, and
Speaker 1: I was from I was living in California at the time.
Speaker 1: People are like, what do you mean by awesome? Is
Speaker 1: it like because you're you know? It was like, no,
Speaker 1: it's because like the word is like godly in a sense,
Speaker 1: like the awesome God is awesome type of thing, like
Speaker 1: the awesomeness of the creator, like that, it means that.
Speaker 1: But also be like it's a word that skaters used
Speaker 1: in the nineties and eighties a lot awesome and cool. Right.
Speaker 1: I don't say radical because I'm not actually from California.
Speaker 1: I don't want to be I don't want to be
Speaker 1: labeled as a dipshit. But I was a skater in
Speaker 1: upstate in New York, so the awesome thing kind of
Speaker 1: went with it. Plus it just tastes that good, So
Speaker 1: there you go. It all works out. The brand X.
Speaker 1: I have some of these already made ence in hand,
Speaker 1: and uh, I have some of the two ouncers. If
Speaker 1: you're just going to go, you know small brandex is
Speaker 1: hotter than our tallyn some claim some claim brandex is
Speaker 1: an other jolly, which make it our hottest. Find out
Speaker 1: what you think is our hottest, right, It's all based
Speaker 1: on Palace Palace. People's palates are different. I have the
Speaker 1: two ounce and the six ounce right now in limited supply.
Speaker 1: That one says it's good. It's eighteen ninety nine for
Speaker 1: the six ounce size with that nice, big sexy label
Speaker 1: on it that was supposed to look like the X files.
Speaker 1: That's our one of our store shelves back in the day.
Speaker 1: You see the right here that had the the plants
Speaker 1: and the can underneath it the matchup plant. Ah, good times.
Speaker 1: I need another store, help help support the show, so
Speaker 1: I can invest in another store and get the labels
Speaker 1: I need so I can give myself and other people's
Speaker 1: stores do that. I'll help out. One stop shop is
Speaker 1: your ten percent of keep on if you're going to
Speaker 1: pick up a few bottles, all right, I think you
Speaker 1: have to get over twenty four dollars and then it
Speaker 1: kicks in and the creating hydrochloride right there, there's two sizes.
Speaker 1: That's why you see this. So whenever you see this
Speaker 1: this thing, you know this range, it's just like with
Speaker 1: his site, it's telling you that you get. You know,
Speaker 1: there's a six out size here, and there's a twelve
Speaker 1: out size and as you get and see it's not
Speaker 1: double the six out size, so getting the larger bottlers
Speaker 1: instead of their right. And then this one's the hardest
Speaker 1: one for me to make, but you know, because it's
Speaker 1: paying the ass to cook all the bacon. I got
Speaker 1: to cook a shit ton of bacon when I make
Speaker 1: that one. But I don't mind. I don't mind it.
Speaker 1: Just don't make me do it when I'm fasting. God,
Speaker 1: damn it. That's not fair. Has the smell all that
Speaker 1: bacon and not touch it? You out of your mind?
Speaker 1: Does drive me out of my mind. Garlics the garlic
Speaker 1: went is so good.
Speaker 7: This is one I go to.
Speaker 1: This is a sous juice extra hot. It's formally called
Speaker 1: Greek lightning because of the you know who the you
Speaker 1: know grease. Greek lightning go gets grease lightning, but I
Speaker 1: call it the Greek lightning. Did I love the old
Speaker 1: picture of it?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: I don't, alright, I had a had one. Suff I
Speaker 1: can tell us that noise and Nemesis is in mago
Speaker 1: hoabinaro sauce. Rob just told me that it was super
Speaker 1: good and something he made. Humsinger's got a bounds of
Speaker 1: beans and cuman tastes like a spicy humus ti peanut sauce.
Speaker 1: The green genies surround on honey and lime, smoke boss
Speaker 1: a chipotle and smoke paprika, tied dies ti chili peppers,
Speaker 1: cayenne and touch a curry. Cosmic candy is honey habit
Speaker 1: narrow see. And what I'm saying to you right now
Speaker 1: is what I would tell people as I'm handing them
Speaker 1: the spoon sample, so that they're hearing what they're supposed
Speaker 1: to be tasting, so it helps enhance his experience. Venom
Speaker 1: is cayenne, serroundo habannaro, tidlei pepper to did that scorpion
Speaker 1: pepper and smoked ghost pepper delicious? Oh yeah, yeah, that's
Speaker 1: one of the ones I drew. It's a little two dimensional,
Speaker 1: but it's it's sorry it was. It was a picture
Speaker 1: of venom that I had drawn. But then some asshole
Speaker 1: who just got out of like you know, college for
Speaker 1: how to fuck people that they call law was like ooh,
Speaker 1: and he's like, well, I don't work with Marvel directly. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he basically saying that I should. Uh, you know, He's like,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. They could you know, I said, I said,
Speaker 1: it's people aren't buying it for the fucking picture of venom.
Speaker 1: They're buying it because it's a good hot sauce. And
Speaker 1: he looked at me and rolled his eyes like like
Speaker 1: somehow a hot sauce would need like and I looked
Speaker 1: at him like, man, you are a worthless, demonic piece
Speaker 1: of shit, Like it's in. But I did change it
Speaker 1: because I didn't I expected him to be back, because
Speaker 1: you know how that's it's like the ambulance chasing in
Speaker 1: a sense. So I had drawn my own depiction of
Speaker 1: venom on there, and then I took it off and
Speaker 1: just put the cause his suit was like this black
Speaker 1: oozy stuff, right, So I just made one drop of
Speaker 1: it and it turned to put a flame on it
Speaker 1: because it's hot sauce. And now it's done. Called a
Speaker 1: venom like that. Try to fucking get me for fregetting
Speaker 1: copyright infringement, now, you prick. That's my pull table. Back
Speaker 1: at the old house still had the pull table. It's
Speaker 1: just a new place, different old label. This is a
Speaker 1: newer label. And the newer label I think it's even
Speaker 1: less of a distinction between the background color and the
Speaker 1: other one, so it's not as Yeah, there you go.
Speaker 1: Awesome on videos over here if you click this thing,
Speaker 1: I have these. There's uh doctor Bryan artist, I'm talking
Speaker 1: about this one's awesome. Hot sauce is like super food,
Speaker 1: micro nu gens, vitamin cea, copper and mangesium. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: there's saving to bolgravano tasting my hot sauces. There's some
Speaker 1: little videos. This is back in the COVID area where
Speaker 1: I had the bottles that I normally used. The six
Speaker 1: sounds were not even available anymore because it came from
Speaker 1: freaking China. Because we're that pathetic of a country that
Speaker 1: we don't even make our own glass anymore. There's a
Speaker 1: place what was called all American Bottles that didn't make
Speaker 1: anything that was at all in it. That's what I meant,
Speaker 1: not at all in American bottles that's what they should
Speaker 1: have called it. That's how much the company had more
Speaker 1: from some of the time that they were created to
Speaker 1: be no no bottles whatsoever from America anymore. And everything's
Speaker 1: cheaper to buy and have it freighted. That's how pathetic
Speaker 1: our economy is. Did you know that? The wages and like,
Speaker 1: I think it was the sixties they said. I think
Speaker 1: they said the sixties. To have the same type of
Speaker 1: buying power for like a homeowner of these days, we'd
Speaker 1: have to be sixty six dollars an hour for the
Speaker 1: money that we have now because it's been appreciated so much.
Speaker 1: The micro batch difference, the awesome difference. There's Rebecca, there's
Speaker 1: me and her when I was a fatter dude. There's
Speaker 1: our store front, cats and space Rebecca. See that was nice.
Speaker 1: So I'm in a long let's see.
Speaker 7: Super super fry llc.
Speaker 16: Hey bacon lovers, try when pigs fly, real apple with
Speaker 16: smoked bacon and maple syrup. Add your eggs and you
Speaker 16: got your breakfast in a bottle. Here's our awesome avocado
Speaker 16: featured at the Wave Cafe and very they replaced all
Speaker 16: their other hot sauces for this one. Delicious avocados locally
Speaker 16: grown in Escondido.
Speaker 1: That's what we saw class our future sauce.
Speaker 16: This month is our local band member and good friend
Speaker 16: Andy Menzi for a smoke Boss hot sauce with chipotle
Speaker 16: nut and from our line of herbal infused honeys. We
Speaker 16: have a rosemary lemon infused in a three and a
Speaker 16: half week process with sage rosemary and lemon tires. I
Speaker 16: had a kick to your honey with our herbal infused
Speaker 16: honey with the kick local clover honey, Sage Carolina reep
Speaker 16: for pepper and the tie pepper all erbal infused for
Speaker 16: three and a half weeks sept fry LLC.
Speaker 1: Pretty cool.
Speaker 3: Huh.
Speaker 1: We don't make the herbal honey anymore, but I probably
Speaker 1: should bring it back because we have we have lost snowbirds.
Speaker 1: They probably don't want the spice, but they like exatic honeys.
Speaker 1: I'll have to have it back and make that one again.
Speaker 1: It's me at the store. There's some I don't know
Speaker 1: what I have it with some of the videos. I
Speaker 1: was eating peppers and I almost killed myself. I was
Speaker 1: eating a Caroline reaper at the at the store because
Speaker 1: I was killing time during a slow day and it
Speaker 1: freaking destroyed me. Like some sometimes I can handle them.
Speaker 1: Some of them are just they are hotter than the
Speaker 1: next one. And I just got one of the deadliest
Speaker 1: ones and I tried to survive it, but I was
Speaker 1: like it was not good. That was my legs went numb.
Speaker 1: They like got super tingly like I don't know if
Speaker 1: that's blood pressure or what, but I felt like I
Speaker 1: was gonna drop dead. Good times. So the next video
Speaker 1: that's gonna come up on here, let me show you
Speaker 1: from my YouTube channel here, let's go to.
Speaker 11: There is.
Speaker 1: But they actually gonna show me. They don't even show
Speaker 1: me my own channel. When I type out the fucking name. Gee,
Speaker 1: I wonder why people can't find it. Fucking fag look
Speaker 1: at this like none of this is the awesome hostile
Speaker 1: that's literally the name of it. What the hell is
Speaker 1: the problem.
Speaker 3: There? It is?
Speaker 1: So I gotta now click on the actual name to
Speaker 1: get to the channel. They wun't nobody s sh it.
Speaker 1: They can't even look for it and search for it
Speaker 1: by name and find it. All right, So where were
Speaker 1: we at? Videos live? So this is the most recent
Speaker 1: one I did. I'm not watching it. I'm just showing
Speaker 1: you this one will be up on that one though
Speaker 1: eventually this was the one I did eighteen hour days
Speaker 1: every day in between.
Speaker 3: So this is the.
Speaker 1: Showing you the rundown of all the stuff that's on
Speaker 1: the website everything. So there you go. But there that'll
Speaker 1: be up. Probably I'll probably put it underneath this one,
Speaker 1: so you see this one first and then and then
Speaker 1: uh yeah, maybe that would and then this one. I
Speaker 1: don't know, maybe put it in between these two. We'll see.
Speaker 1: Let's see how it goes. All right, we've been here
Speaker 1: long enough. FDJ. Thanks where we have a wonderful day.
Speaker 1: It wasn't say anyth from I hope hopefully people will
Speaker 1: do what I have recommended and get themselves in a
Speaker 1: healthier state in life and join us tomorrow with doctor
Speaker 1: Glidden when he is here noon my time, this kid
Speaker 1: right here, it's already six o'clock. Jesus. I was not
Speaker 1: able to sleep all night last night, so I stayed
Speaker 1: in and it's raining, so that didn't help that I
Speaker 1: slept a little bit longer because it was rating. Without
Speaker 1: being aware that I was, is this what is this?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: We have a four minute video I forgot about Okay,
Speaker 1: let's do this. This is about signal itself. Where's my fad?
Speaker 1: What am I looking at? What do I look like
Speaker 1: right now? Eh? Good enough?
Speaker 10: If you watch your other videos, you know.
Speaker 17: Celebrate has been selling technologies to governments that crack supported
Speaker 17: iPhones and Android devices via USB. In twenty twenty one,
Speaker 17: they announced they could crack signals PIN protected encryption of
Speaker 17: the data at rest.
Speaker 1: Well, I remember the e sims will make it so
Speaker 1: they don't even have to have it. They could do
Speaker 1: it wirelessly because they're just going to get permissions through
Speaker 1: the software to do so.
Speaker 17: So when it Celebrate accidentally posted how they crack signals
Speaker 17: encryption in a blog before delete it. Luckily copies were
Speaker 17: already made. The article sheds light into how they crack
Speaker 17: the encryption, but it fails to connect a lot of
Speaker 17: the dots which will attempt to connect. It's unclear if
Speaker 17: it was just poorly written or if they intentionally left
Speaker 17: it vague for operational security, although if opsec was on
Speaker 17: the mine, they probably wouldn't have posted it all. The
Speaker 17: encryption in this case is symmetric encryption. The big thing
Speaker 17: here is that the keys are stored on the device,
Speaker 17: so all the pieces to the complex puzzle are available,
Speaker 17: so anyone with access to the device has the ability
Speaker 17: to access the keys and then celebrates case. They specialize
Speaker 17: in cracking lock phones via USB. Many banking apps like
Speaker 17: Vemo have a similar architecture with keys stored on the device.
Speaker 17: The primary reason developers do this is because it's required
Speaker 17: to use the application offline, so there's really no way
Speaker 17: around it. Also, both Android and Signal or open source,
Speaker 17: which provides clues to solving this puzzle. Signal keeps his
Speaker 17: database encrypted using seql cipher, so reading the data requires
Speaker 17: a key to decrypt. They found that the decryption key
Speaker 17: is encrypted and stored in the share preferences file, and
Speaker 17: it is decrypted with the Android secret key, which is
Speaker 17: saved in an Android feature called key store using the freedom.
Speaker 1: Oh you know what I just meant, I forgot. Let
Speaker 1: me just remind everybody, So let me move my head again,
Speaker 1: just real quick, just so people are aware. In case
Speaker 1: they didn't know this rumble. Since I'll never ever build it,
Speaker 1: I just looked at the they have new coops for
Speaker 1: me to jump through and YouTube. Plus they have me
Speaker 1: screwed until December or whatever. As far as these violations,
Speaker 1: that they claim I've done. So the only way I'm
Speaker 1: ever going to be able to do like superchat is
Speaker 1: it with this thing right here. So just so you
Speaker 1: know it's there, you cook the little thing, you can
Speaker 1: superchat it here, or you can subscribe right there. All right,
Speaker 1: Moving on, Shut up, Rascal, no one asked you come
Speaker 1: in there? Come in where are at?
Speaker 17: A Dynamic code Instrumentation toolkit and putting the Android device
Speaker 17: into development mode that can access the Android key store
Speaker 17: and view the key stored within, so they were able
Speaker 17: to get the Android secret key to decrypt the SQL
Speaker 17: cipher key. Once they decrypted the SQL cipher key, they
Speaker 17: needed to know how to decrypt the database using the
Speaker 17: SQL cipher so they looked at signals open source code
Speaker 17: and looked for any call to the database, which led
Speaker 17: them to the parameters they needed to run the seat.
Speaker 1: Remember they're running down the wrong rabbit hole here though,
Speaker 1: they're chasing the wrong rabbit remember, because you have pre
Speaker 1: encryption software on your computer hardware and software making it
Speaker 1: so that they're taking pictures of your screen before it,
Speaker 1: so pre encryption, right, they don't even need to worry
Speaker 1: about cracking it. But this is even Yeah, I get
Speaker 1: this is an additional an additional problem, sure, but they
Speaker 1: don't even need to worry about this well.
Speaker 17: Cipher this unlocked the database and yielded encrypted messages. But
Speaker 17: now the unencrypted Signal database showed a new submode called
Speaker 17: signal dot bd dot.
Speaker 10: Decrypted at store the messages.
Speaker 17: There was one file for the unencrypted messages and one
Speaker 17: for attachments, which were still encrypted. The attachments and messages
Speaker 17: are also not directly linked. To link the attachments the messages,
Speaker 17: it requires parsing to decrypt the attachment. They looked again
Speaker 17: into the shared preferences file and found a value under
Speaker 17: this file that has data and initialization vector fields under it.
Speaker 17: The data field contained an encrypted Jason file. While they
Speaker 17: didn't specify, we assume they encrypted it using the android's
Speaker 17: secret key again.
Speaker 10: Or some other key in the key store. Once encrypted, it.
Speaker 17: Contains the alphuscated decryption keys for the encrypted attachments. This
Speaker 17: Jason contains three keys, classic sepher key, classic mac key,
Speaker 17: and modern key. The new reversions of Signal used the
Speaker 17: modern key, so they focused on this key. This modern
Speaker 17: key doesn't decrypt the attachments directly. While they didn't specify,
Speaker 17: we assume they tried to use the modern key first,
Speaker 17: and also tried it with the initialization vector referenced in
Speaker 17: the other table that was in the same folder. After
Speaker 17: enough guessing, as well as examining the open source code
Speaker 17: that logically seems to support this, they probably backed into
Speaker 17: the conclusion that they needed to use the modern key
Speaker 17: and data underscore random values to calculate the actual decryption key.
Speaker 17: Somewhere in the source code, they found that the actual
Speaker 17: decryption key is a hash of the data underscore random
Speaker 17: value using hmac Shah two hundred and fifty six algorithm,
Speaker 17: and the modern key is hash to create the initialization vector.
Speaker 17: The open source code also told them sigmal uses as
Speaker 17: encryption and CTR mode, so they apply their key to
Speaker 17: this and unencrypted the attachments. The lessons seem to be
Speaker 17: pretty straightforward. The keys for data programmatically encrypted on the
Speaker 17: device tend to also be stored on the device, which
Speaker 17: means the encryption is not one hundred percent secure and
Speaker 17: its main protection is really obfuscation. This has been a
Speaker 17: similar vulnerability that cryptocurrency steeler malware is exploit.
Speaker 10: Also, open source code is a double edged sword.
Speaker 17: Lot allows for more people to test the security and
Speaker 17: find bugs. Analyzing The open source code seem to be
Speaker 17: instrumental for Celebrate to find the keys and crack signals encryption.
Speaker 17: Without it, solving this puzzle would have been much harder.
Speaker 17: Closed source, obfuscated code that is rigorously tested privately maybe
Speaker 17: the best option for encryption architectures where all of the
Speaker 17: keys are stored on the device.
Speaker 1: Some inches. I wasn't trying to do that. Leaked Celebrate
Speaker 1: tool docs documents reveal list of phones that can be unlocked. Okay, okay,
Speaker 1: all right, what the hell still thought that was? It's
Speaker 1: so funny that predator passer to throw them back in jail,
Speaker 1: And I was like, is that Eric kerk Ah, that's great,
Speaker 1: and the answers yes, that's good. Yeah, right exactly exactly,
Speaker 1: Veritas live. Move my head so I can read it
Speaker 1: to people, because it's not I'm right in front of it.
Speaker 1: Let's go to that one says if you have something
Speaker 1: secret to say, say it in person, or do it
Speaker 1: the old fashioned way mail a letter. Yeah, that can
Speaker 1: be read, though people today rely upon electronic communication way
Speaker 1: too much. All right, it's convenient and it's a big
Speaker 1: secret because you're hiding inside, You're hiding in your bed
Speaker 1: when you send the message. Nobody saw you, right. It's
Speaker 1: so funny how people think some great historical VIDs rise
Speaker 1: and fall and your Yeah. Yeah, Michael S. King has
Speaker 1: been on my has been on my shuttle. I've read
Speaker 1: the bad Word a bunch of times. Yep. Yeah, Uh,
Speaker 1: that's one of the videos. That's one of the books.
Speaker 1: I was surprised, like books series they did. They deleted
Speaker 1: them off of Rumble. Uh what the hell am I saying?
Speaker 1: They deleted them off of Amazon Kindle and Amazon obviously
Speaker 1: if you're getting hardcovers or uh, physical copies. But I
Speaker 1: have them all on my Kindle, and surprisingly they're still
Speaker 1: there because of the digital rights management. I was surprised
Speaker 1: that they didn't take them away. Let me let me
Speaker 1: see if I can show you my Kendle real quick.
Speaker 1: I might be able to. And I'll just let us
Speaker 1: look under his name. I'm gotta display capture and I
Speaker 1: guess gott to open it up along Kindle.
Speaker 3: Is it?
Speaker 1: I got rid of re blox from my computer. By
Speaker 1: the way, what we're looking at bro okay, you can
Speaker 1: see it? No, it's oh, oh not this is oh,
Speaker 1: this is one of his books. This is Andrew the
Speaker 1: Great the heroic story of Andrew Jackson that they don't
Speaker 1: want you to know. Let's go library. There's Napoleon Welden
Speaker 1: versus the Older New World Orders. There's my book, it's
Speaker 1: a sample of it. There's Doctor Claydon's book, his one
Speaker 1: previous to the one he has now that you should
Speaker 1: probably all get. There's Teddy the Terrible. That's another Michaels
Speaker 1: King book. Some of these aren't that great, and I
Speaker 1: am read all of them cho often. I canna, you
Speaker 1: have to clean up the floor group behind me? Hell Storm.
Speaker 1: Everybody should have that one, the Roosevelts. That's a Michaels
Speaker 1: King book. I don't like Ike Michaels King, Killing America,
Speaker 1: Michaels King, Climate Boogeyman, Michael S. King, Woodrow Wilson Warmonger,
Speaker 1: Michael S. King. This one, yeah, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: But I just picked it up anyway because I was
Speaker 1: reading all those other books. Oh wait, no, what this
Speaker 1: isn't his? This is Robert S. Smith. Never mind, uh,
Speaker 1: Saint Joseph of Wisconsin, Michaels King, The Planet. Rothschild's books
Speaker 1: are what actually got him kicked off. This is these
Speaker 1: are the first ones that they removed vome went and
Speaker 1: Volume two Wargan's putin Michael S.
Speaker 7: King.
Speaker 1: Everybody should read that one too. It's a little dated.
Speaker 1: I think it came out in twenty fourteen, but still
Speaker 1: it's all good. Maybe it was was it twenty fourteen?
Speaker 1: Let's find out. What does suck is that everything's on
Speaker 1: cloud so they can just delete your ability to read
Speaker 1: these by deleting your access the cicero.
Speaker 2: Do you know yet?
Speaker 1: Get me here? Uh, let's good too. How do you
Speaker 1: know when it was written? Maybe let's go to cover
Speaker 1: and scroll. No, that's the same thing. Doesn't have an
Speaker 1: age as of this date of publication May twenty fourteen.
Speaker 7: There we go.
Speaker 1: I thought I thought I was more fourteenth. See, I'm
Speaker 1: pretty good like that. I remember stupid shit, stupid details,
Speaker 1: secrets of the Federal Reserve. Anybody who says treat you
Speaker 1: from Jackal Island, Tell them to shove it up their
Speaker 1: asshole sideways, tell them to stop reading the water down
Speaker 1: faggot version of theft and forgery and plagiarism, not forgery
Speaker 1: but plagiarism, and tell them to get this one. Tell
Speaker 1: him that this one has been updated since but it
Speaker 1: originally came out in nineteen fifty fucking two, and it
Speaker 1: was useless. Mullins, Yeah, yeah good. The original book, published
Speaker 1: under the title Mullins on the Federal Reserve, was commissioned
Speaker 1: by the Poetzra Pond in nineteen forty eight. Yeah. I
Speaker 1: think they beat Gebra Griffin by a little bit, a
Speaker 1: little bit. Ezra Pond was a political prisoner for thirteen
Speaker 1: and a half years at Saint Elizabeth Hospital, Washington, d C.
Speaker 1: A federal institution for the insane political prisoner. His release
Speaker 1: was accomplished largely through the efforts of mister Moens. The
Speaker 1: research at the Library of Congress was directed and review
Speaker 1: daily by George Dimpson, founder of the National Press Club
Speaker 1: in Washington, whom The New York Times on September twenty
Speaker 1: at nineteen eighty two called the highly regarded reference source
Speaker 1: in the Capitol. Government officials, congressman and reporters went on
Speaker 1: to went to him for information on any subjects. Published
Speaker 1: in nineteen fifty two by Casper and Hort in New York,
Speaker 1: the original book was the first nationally circulated revelation of
Speaker 1: the secret meetings of the International bankers at Jeckyll Island,
Speaker 1: Georgia in nineteen oh seven to nineteen ten, at which
Speaker 1: place the draft of the Federal Reserved Act of nineteen
Speaker 1: thirteen was written. During the intervening years, and by the way,
Speaker 1: the Alderch Plan was the same goddamn thing. During the
Speaker 1: intervening years, the author continued to gather new and more
Speaker 1: startling information about the backgrounds of the people who directed
Speaker 1: the federies of policies. New information gathered over the years
Speaker 1: from hundreds of newspapers, periodicals, books, give collaborating insight into
Speaker 1: the connections and international banking houses. While researching this material,
Speaker 1: Eustace was one of the staff was on the staff
Speaker 1: of the National Library of Congress who was kicked off
Speaker 1: it millions later. Was a consultant on the highway finance
Speaker 1: for the American Petroleum Institute, consultant on hotel development for
Speaker 1: the Institutions of so for the Institution's magazine, and editorial
Speaker 1: director for the Chicago Motor Clubs. For publications. And this
Speaker 1: is the say published by the Federalies or Bank of
Speaker 1: Boston and at seventh printing, and you need to okay,
Speaker 1: that's not part of this in nineteen okay, so you
Speaker 1: get it right, right, right, This is one of the
Speaker 1: iterations of it that it came in. So there's this
Speaker 1: is the updated versions, the fifty two version, nineteen fifty two.
Speaker 1: I never even looked at this thing. I may have
Speaker 1: actually looked at it, but it was disgusting. Fuck that guy.
Speaker 1: Common sense when one should read this not to tessel
Speaker 1: books in there, not all of them are are great,
Speaker 1: but when you have all of them, you know, uh yeah, ooh,
Speaker 1: complete as federalist papers, US Constitution, common Sense again, and
Speaker 1: I know what the hell that was. I think it
Speaker 1: came up free or something. A lot of these books
Speaker 1: here were used to be free. I don't know if
Speaker 1: they still do that in kindle or not. Hey, look
Speaker 1: look at it. It looks like China bomb. That's great,
Speaker 1: that's great. Mm hmmmmmm. All right, well there you go.
Speaker 1: Now I've seen it. This is the most recent well
Speaker 1: it's not I don't know is it the most speers
Speaker 1: but it's one of the dollars Jeffrey's books. I already
Speaker 1: found things in there. I was like, nope, yes, everybody
Speaker 1: should read Virus Media, b Schamber Pasture or here's the
Speaker 1: book I was telling you about. Everybody. God damn read
Speaker 1: that book. Do it? This is something that Niche told
Speaker 1: me to read and I couldn't because it was it
Speaker 1: was this is all cabalist bullshit that is into demonlogy
Speaker 1: and all kinds of crap and trying to verify and
Speaker 1: validate the Kabbala. I'm like, fuck that and the Old Testament,
Speaker 1: all the things I hate that I know are fucking
Speaker 1: fake and gay and Jewish. And you want me to
Speaker 1: utilize that, go fuck yourselves and her. That's why we don't.
Speaker 1: We don't talk anymore anyway. But it's the Hipta Maaron
Speaker 1: or magical elements. I was looking into all their sick
Speaker 1: fucking practices, livers asalmonas, except for Raziel. Let's see the
Speaker 1: look of alchemy, look of the chemical art, the way
Speaker 1: the warrior that's stuff on. I should have a art
Speaker 1: of urban survival in here somewhere, too, may be rich.
Speaker 1: And I have obviously read that one sixteen sixty six.
Speaker 1: I think my daughter grabbed that one our son God
Speaker 1: Christianity before Christ. I wonder if there's any allusions to Uh,
Speaker 1: it's interesting, that's maybe Parsons. I only read it that far.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, because it's a bunch of bullshit, probably about Christianity. Anyway,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. I'll look in there and see if
Speaker 1: there's anything about the our ancestors, and if it's valid,
Speaker 1: and if it's hearkening back to the ED, of which
Speaker 1: I doubt it would be. But we'll see. Even when
Speaker 1: they think that they have something to say, that's usually
Speaker 1: a deception and that's wrong. That's why I bothers me,
Speaker 1: like I can't find anything to even listen to when
Speaker 1: I'm working anymore. It's like what do I go through?
Speaker 1: Because that's once you read the EDA. It's like how
Speaker 1: many covers can you read the same thing over again?
Speaker 1: And it's like once that's once you realize that's not
Speaker 1: being Let's put this way, if you know the information
Speaker 1: in there, the makers of civilization, you see the evidence
Speaker 1: of it in everything, in everything. Now to mention the
Speaker 1: fact that there's actual artifacts that write that have this
Speaker 1: written out or drawn and depicted, actual scenes of the
Speaker 1: Aeda telling you about your ancestors and the history and
Speaker 1: this evil cult and all this other stuff, and who
Speaker 1: they are and what they are. Semitic Kaldans cald Semites,
Speaker 1: before they started intermingling with everybody else there called the
Speaker 1: cald Semites. They were like Arab slash Turkish people, right,
Speaker 1: most of them and whatever. So when people don't account
Speaker 1: for that and then they spin some other tangent, it's
Speaker 1: like they're they're either very they're very confident, and they're like,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm going to put myself into it trance
Speaker 1: and just muse, and then therefore it will be true
Speaker 1: because I'm channeling some fucking thing like that type of
Speaker 1: like self delusionment or they're banking on you not knowing
Speaker 1: shit about this the topic yourself, so that they can
Speaker 1: tell you anything and it'll be bought. You'll you'll buy
Speaker 1: the lie. Depending on what state you're in. You should
Speaker 1: have in your possession, in your vehicle or in your home,
Speaker 1: your state, and your in your federal constitution. Right, you
Speaker 1: should have this national whatever you want to call it.
Speaker 1: And the bill frights obviously, James Choose a duchebag. Don't
Speaker 1: care about him anymore. Jays Ergi's a dutchbeg. Don't care
Speaker 1: about him anymore. Oh yeah, interview with Hitler, This is
Speaker 1: an interesting one. I've had this forever. Oh there's Genghis
Speaker 1: sponsor right there. The shocking story of Genghis Khan and
Speaker 1: the mass murdering Mongols. And notice when he came across
Speaker 1: the Kazars, they just basically gave themselves as gave each
Speaker 1: other a fist pump and a nod every other people
Speaker 1: that the Kazars and the Mongols and Kina they would slaughter.
Speaker 1: But yet when they came into each other they fistbot
Speaker 1: Why do you think that is? Come on, post locans,
Speaker 1: like I said, like these are all still in here,
Speaker 1: but you can't get these from Amazon anymore. That was
Speaker 1: supposed to be. That supposed to be. It's supposed to be,
Speaker 1: like Oprah, come on, open up. The following interview quote unquote,
Speaker 1: though obviously a fictional event, accurately portrays what the ghost
Speaker 1: of Adulf Hitler would say in his defense if he
Speaker 1: could be interviewed today. His answers that, dude, I bought
Speaker 1: this book in like twenty seventeen, twenty sixteen, something like that,
Speaker 1: maybe it was twenty seventeen. His answers to WCBC talk
Speaker 1: show host Ogre Winfreed Winfield instead of Oprah Winfrey. He
Speaker 1: is an ogre questions are mostly based upon the and
Speaker 1: extensive and careful reading of his writings and speeches fromnineteen
Speaker 1: twenty one to nineteen forty five, as well as those
Speaker 1: of his inner circle and others who knew him and
Speaker 1: survived the war. When does that liberty to reflectively dismiss
Speaker 1: the veracity of or accuracy of Hitler's version of events
Speaker 1: if one so chooses. However, what cannot be disputed is
Speaker 1: this Hitler's responses to Ogre's questions truly represent what he
Speaker 1: would say if such an interview could take place. Indeed,
Speaker 1: some of Hitler's answers are direct quotes taken from his
Speaker 1: own speeches and writings. So if Hitler's account does not
Speaker 1: please you, take it up with him. In regard to
Speaker 1: the fictional ougur reaction, immediately, artistic license was taken there.
Speaker 1: But as for the portrayal of Hitler's point of view,
Speaker 1: there can be no dispute. If such a made for
Speaker 1: TV event were possible, it would surely be the most
Speaker 1: watched show in broadcast history. You know, so this He's
Speaker 1: sitting there imagining, you know, a prime time sit down
Speaker 1: interview with Oprah Winfrey of all people, and obviously disparaging
Speaker 1: her name right away. What the hell has happened?
Speaker 3: And uh?
Speaker 1: And Adolf Hitler the one that we can't have We
Speaker 1: should have one with with with another great man like Putin.
Speaker 1: We didn't have one with Goadaffi. There's a couple there,
Speaker 1: there's a Goadaffi w one. I'll show it next next show.
Speaker 1: You know you would watch it. They want the whimsical
Speaker 1: setting of the interview with Hitler and distract you too
Speaker 1: much for this is utterly serious and scholarly history. For
Speaker 1: more in depth and fully sourced understanding of World War Two,
Speaker 1: The Bad War is recommended as a companion book to
Speaker 1: Interview with Hitler, enjoy the show. Yes, I have Bad
Speaker 1: War here? Did I not show that one? It's in here.
Speaker 1: Let's say search if it's not in here, I have
Speaker 1: an on PDF. Oh you know what it is. I
Speaker 1: bet you hold that much. Now let's go to the
Speaker 1: pdf files. Not, oh shit, it's per This is what
Speaker 1: sucks about. Yeah, se versus documents and it says zero.
Speaker 1: So my old computer has all of my all of
Speaker 1: my pdf not yeah. Now you can't even say pdfile.
Speaker 1: So I'll think of pedophiles because there's fucking assholes. Right.
Speaker 1: Pdf file books are on my old computer in kindle,
Speaker 1: but they don't transfer from device to device. They they're
Speaker 1: local to the to the system, so they're not on
Speaker 1: my phone kindle, and they're not on this new computer.
Speaker 1: But I do have the Bad War. It's just not
Speaker 1: the official copy for some reason. I have the and
Speaker 1: I've read it like a ton of times. I have
Speaker 1: it on and maybe it's in here. Let's say it'd
Speaker 1: be hard to find though, because it's not it's not
Speaker 1: written the right way. There's ed lead Scale in the
Speaker 1: Devil Diction, aerieal to Waft blood pass Over. Let's see
Speaker 1: that's that Jacob blober guy basking Hole. I don't know,
Speaker 1: Frescraph my book, Gadafi's Green Book, World Order, tatricon the Petronius,
Speaker 1: the Sonic fraternalism in Matt Hamaden, Mohammed and mun Oh,
Speaker 1: that's funny. I gotta check a look that good Luther
Speaker 1: on Jews, the Jews in their lies, Doctor Martin Luther,
Speaker 1: Martin Lutheran, fuck you, fuck you in that fucking noise
Speaker 1: that pisses me off. Black magic evocation invocation whatever evocation. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the New History of the Gews by Yusu. Smullen's widell
Speaker 1: area in origin in the Alphabet Eliot what Mike, there's
Speaker 1: Civilization and Race and History. The Hidden History of the
Speaker 1: Human Race Michael Crimo, The orlanda book. I mean, ill
Speaker 1: to transfer some of these to my phone so I
Speaker 1: can read on the olyptical here soon. There's are good
Speaker 1: ones I went to see, maybe some more primo one.
Speaker 1: Let's see if that one is this one called? Is
Speaker 1: this one have video pictures of it? You fucking some
Speaker 1: of it? Of course? Do what else? Would I figure?
Speaker 1: It's already there. You can open it or not? Yeah? Okay?
Speaker 1: The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael Cremo
Speaker 1: and Richard Thompson. Oh I'm not side by sides please, okay,
Speaker 1: get Thank god it it's hard to read on tiny
Speaker 1: screen and it's side by side. Look at everything's awesome? Yeah? Thanks? Cool?
Speaker 1: All right, I have to check this out. Is there
Speaker 1: any pictures though? Yes?
Speaker 7: There is?
Speaker 1: Cool? All right, neat. It's kind of a short book
Speaker 1: for a Cremo book, major scientific cover up exposed, the
Speaker 1: hidden the History of the Human Race. I bet he's
Speaker 1: still is going to miss them things that are in
Speaker 1: the that are in the ATA guaranteed because everybody does.
Speaker 1: All right, well it's not in here. But let's see
Speaker 1: if we can find it together. You ready, let's do it.
Speaker 1: Let's go back to the window. Capture you're displaying, go
Speaker 1: back to the window, and then we just type in
Speaker 1: the bed War's this actually gonna be it?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: I don't think so let's find out. Let's try it,
Speaker 1: you know, a fucking open or not? What would possibly
Speaker 1: take that long? I should have just to do this? Guy, Okay,
Speaker 1: that's the actual book. Now, let's go down here and
Speaker 1: see if they're in. There isn't one. So they want
Speaker 1: you to renuse automatic that you can log in and
Speaker 1: bottle it. But you can't download it from internet archive
Speaker 1: because there are a bunch of Jews. They don't want
Speaker 1: you to have it. So there's that that one. You
Speaker 1: can't get it the way you used to be able
Speaker 1: to get Let's see if fanta these actually work? You
Speaker 1: can actually do it?
Speaker 11: Or not?
Speaker 1: Asked monkey, why don't have to press the twice? Fag
Speaker 1: that one? Didn't do it? The clintoner ass So I
Speaker 1: don't want similar am as king. Oh, Jefference was part
Speaker 1: of that book. I didn't know that. I wouldn't have
Speaker 1: known what his name mad even meant back then when
Speaker 1: I first started reading this book. The effects ready I'm
Speaker 1: not a robot. Let's see, is it gonna actually pop
Speaker 1: up anything or no? Dope, kuman not the roman. Oh look,
Speaker 1: let's see if it does it downloads and then we'll
Speaker 1: pull up this twenty nine point nine megabytes. I don't
Speaker 1: know if that's that. That seems kind of small. How
Speaker 1: fuck did it go? That does look like it's right? Yeah,
Speaker 1: so it's not able to fucking unless it's still thinking.
Speaker 1: Is it's still trying to do it? No, it's saying
Speaker 1: it's done. So it gave me bullshit. Let's try again.
Speaker 1: Fuck you, come on, fag, Yeah, it's noting you do it?
Speaker 1: Come on? Can patch it in valid? Bitch? I just
Speaker 1: patched the button and hit it. Yeah, this is all bullshit.
Speaker 1: I don't know I have it on when my computers
Speaker 1: all available to get it. I think it's on my phone.
Speaker 1: But yeah, that's kind of bullshit. Let's go like this
Speaker 1: shut Yes, I want to replace it now it's still
Speaker 1: the same one. Yeah, it's it's bullshit. I don't know
Speaker 1: it's out there and I had it before, so I
Speaker 1: don't know. Is he actually still doing stuff himself? He
Speaker 1: is okay, good, He's been on my show a long
Speaker 1: time ago. So the most recent one was five hours ago.
Speaker 1: All right, cool, so he is still wrong. You know
Speaker 1: what's his His tomato thing tomato bubble then turned into
Speaker 1: like the real what that hell? It was called? Yeah,
Speaker 1: real news and history I am on. His newsletter didn't
Speaker 1: just stopped coming unless it was sent into uh like
Speaker 1: the one of the ship files on by their choice.
Speaker 1: In that mine, I'm not. I don't agree with a
Speaker 1: lot of his Trump bullshit though he's still he's still
Speaker 1: riding that rove. He still believes in that, which means
Speaker 1: he's kind of blind to the whole jew thing too.
Speaker 1: In that sense, he's not, he's not, but he is
Speaker 1: because of the connections. I don't know if anything's changed since,
Speaker 1: but he's still as far as not too far along,
Speaker 1: not too long ago, was bringing them up as if
Speaker 1: they're bringing up Trump as if he's a valid and
Speaker 1: viable source of potential saving the planet type of thing,
Speaker 1: which is completely ridiculous and foolish, and we'll get people
Speaker 1: killed believing in that. So that's my problem with that.
Speaker 1: But anyway, support the show.