WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.480 --> 00:00:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the quart Side Quantum Physics Podcast, an exploration

2
00:00:05.679 --> 00:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of the fundamental structure of reality where quantum laws govern matter, energy,

3
00:00:11.199 --> 00:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,

4
00:00:16.719 --> 00:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and understanding begins at the smallest scales.

5
00:00:27.559 --> 00:00:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I want you to imagine the computer of the future,

6
00:00:30.640 --> 00:00:32.799
<v Speaker 2>just you know, picture the physical hardware in your head

7
00:00:32.880 --> 00:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>right now.

8
00:00:33.679 --> 00:00:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Most people are probably picturing something pretty sterile.

9
00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:41.039
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly, like glowing silicon wafer is stacked in some

10
00:00:41.240 --> 00:00:46.159
<v Speaker 2>massive server farm. Or maybe those giant, super cooled gold

11
00:00:46.240 --> 00:00:49.719
<v Speaker 2>chandeliers of wire that big tech companies are always showing

12
00:00:49.719 --> 00:00:50.759
<v Speaker 2>off in their press photos.

13
00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the classic quantum chandelier.

14
00:00:53.039 --> 00:00:55.799
<v Speaker 2>We are so culturally conditioned to think the next big

15
00:00:55.880 --> 00:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>leap in computing is just going to be like a colder,

16
00:00:59.039 --> 00:01:02.719
<v Speaker 2>more densely passed version of traditional electronics. Yeah, but what

17
00:01:02.759 --> 00:01:05.680
<v Speaker 2>if the hardware of tomorrow doesn't really look like electronics

18
00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:05.959
<v Speaker 2>at all?

19
00:01:06.040 --> 00:01:07.799
<v Speaker 3>What if it looks like a chemistry experiment.

20
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, because today we are unpacking a major milestone from

21
00:01:11.680 --> 00:01:15.439
<v Speaker 2>May twenty twenty six from Envision Quantum Technologies, and it

22
00:01:15.560 --> 00:01:18.200
<v Speaker 2>sounds remarkably like science fiction. It really does.

23
00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>They basically took a single specifically engineered molecule, the Carbeene

24
00:01:22.920 --> 00:01:25.359
<v Speaker 3>right right, very particular type of molecule called the carbine,

25
00:01:25.879 --> 00:01:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and they successfully turned it into a fully functioning unit

26
00:01:29.079 --> 00:01:32.040
<v Speaker 3>of quantum information, a molecular quibit.

27
00:01:32.239 --> 00:01:34.319
<v Speaker 2>So if you're listening, just think about that for a second.

28
00:01:34.719 --> 00:01:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if instead of waiting for some massive semiconductor foundry

29
00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:41.760
<v Speaker 2>to shave like another nanimeter off a silicon chip, you

30
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>could literally just synthesize a perfect batch of microscopic hard

31
00:01:46.280 --> 00:01:48.000
<v Speaker 2>drives in a lab beaker.

32
00:01:48.200 --> 00:01:51.239
<v Speaker 3>It's a complete inversion of how we think about engineering

33
00:01:51.879 --> 00:01:54.719
<v Speaker 3>because for decades the assumption has been that you construct

34
00:01:54.719 --> 00:01:59.159
<v Speaker 3>a computer from the top down, you know, manufacturing, etching, stamping, but.

35
00:01:59.159 --> 00:02:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Brewing the basic building blocks of a supercomputer. That forces

36
00:02:02.840 --> 00:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>us to entirely rethink what a machine actually is.

37
00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely and our goal today is to unpack exactly how

38
00:02:10.120 --> 00:02:13.719
<v Speaker 3>these designer molecules actually hold data, why they might honestly

39
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>give current quantum computers a real run for their money,

40
00:02:17.439 --> 00:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>and what this means for the future of the Internet.

41
00:02:20.639 --> 00:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>So to understand why this is such a big deal,

42
00:02:22.520 --> 00:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>we really have to look at the physical anatomy of

43
00:02:24.439 --> 00:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the hardware itself, like what exactly is a carben and

44
00:02:28.599 --> 00:02:31.599
<v Speaker 2>how does a cluster of atoms hold programmable information?

45
00:02:32.080 --> 00:02:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, to answer that, we have to start with carbon.

46
00:02:33.719 --> 00:02:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Carbon is basically the fundamental backbone of organic chemistry. In

47
00:02:37.479 --> 00:02:40.960
<v Speaker 3>its most stable, happy state, a carbon atom likes to

48
00:02:41.039 --> 00:02:43.960
<v Speaker 3>form four chemical bonds with the atoms around it.

49
00:02:44.039 --> 00:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>So like a standard methane molecule, you've got one carbon

50
00:02:47.159 --> 00:02:50.360
<v Speaker 2>atom in the middle holding hands with four hydrogen.

51
00:02:49.879 --> 00:02:53.479
<v Speaker 3>Atoms, exactly four hands holding four other atoms. But a

52
00:02:53.520 --> 00:02:57.159
<v Speaker 3>carbine forces carbon into this highly unusual state where it

53
00:02:57.199 --> 00:02:58.520
<v Speaker 3>only forms two bonds.

54
00:02:58.599 --> 00:03:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it's structural incomplete. It has empty hands.

55
00:03:02.439 --> 00:03:06.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, those empty hands are the defining feature. Because the

56
00:03:06.039 --> 00:03:09.039
<v Speaker 3>carbon atom is only forming two bonds, it is left

57
00:03:09.080 --> 00:03:12.159
<v Speaker 3>with two unshared, free floating electrons in its.

58
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Outer show the ivolink carbon right divalent.

59
00:03:14.800 --> 00:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, in a normal setup, those two electrons might just

60
00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:19.520
<v Speaker 3>pair up and cancel each other out, but in this

61
00:03:19.680 --> 00:03:23.520
<v Speaker 3>specific carbiene they remain unpaired. They just sit there, highly

62
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:26.400
<v Speaker 3>reactive and incredibly sensitive to their environment.

63
00:03:26.719 --> 00:03:29.599
<v Speaker 2>Those two lonely electrons are what actually store the data.

64
00:03:30.240 --> 00:03:32.840
<v Speaker 2>The documentation points out that they create what's called a

65
00:03:32.879 --> 00:03:35.800
<v Speaker 2>triplet state, which I mean I know, a classical computer

66
00:03:35.879 --> 00:03:38.319
<v Speaker 2>stores data as a bit like a zero our.

67
00:03:38.360 --> 00:03:40.599
<v Speaker 3>One, like a coin line flat on a table, its

68
00:03:40.639 --> 00:03:41.280
<v Speaker 3>heads or its.

69
00:03:41.120 --> 00:03:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Tails, right, But how does a triplet state physically store

70
00:03:45.759 --> 00:03:46.639
<v Speaker 2>quantum information?

71
00:03:46.800 --> 00:03:49.400
<v Speaker 3>It all comes down to quantum spin. You can think

72
00:03:49.400 --> 00:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>of an electron as having a tiny built in magnetic

73
00:03:52.599 --> 00:03:56.919
<v Speaker 3>compass needle. Okay, And because these two electrons are unpaired

74
00:03:57.080 --> 00:04:00.759
<v Speaker 3>but still interacting with each other, their needles basically align

75
00:04:00.840 --> 00:04:04.039
<v Speaker 3>parallel to one another. They act as a single combined

76
00:04:04.120 --> 00:04:08.879
<v Speaker 3>quantum system, and that parallel alignment gives them three possible

77
00:04:08.919 --> 00:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>spin configurations, hence the term, you know, triplet. But because

78
00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>it's a quantum system, it doesn't just pick one state

79
00:04:15.479 --> 00:04:16.079
<v Speaker 3>and stay there.

80
00:04:16.199 --> 00:04:18.920
<v Speaker 2>It sits in a superposition. I always like to picture

81
00:04:19.000 --> 00:04:21.160
<v Speaker 2>quantum spin like a microscopic spinning top.

82
00:04:21.399 --> 00:04:22.399
<v Speaker 3>That's a great analogy.

83
00:04:22.519 --> 00:04:24.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So a classical bit is like a top that

84
00:04:24.560 --> 00:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>has already fallen over. It's definitively pointing left or right. Yeah,

85
00:04:27.680 --> 00:04:31.319
<v Speaker 2>But a quantum electron is an actively spinning top. It's

86
00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:35.360
<v Speaker 2>holding an incredibly complex amount of positional data while it's

87
00:04:35.360 --> 00:04:38.399
<v Speaker 2>in motion. It's in multiple orientations at the same time

88
00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:39.759
<v Speaker 2>until we force it to stop.

89
00:04:39.920 --> 00:04:43.720
<v Speaker 3>That captures the complexity perfectly, and the challenge for physicists

90
00:04:43.759 --> 00:04:46.720
<v Speaker 3>hasn't really been proving that electrons spin. We know they do.

91
00:04:47.160 --> 00:04:50.319
<v Speaker 3>The challenge is that these spinning tops are incredibly delicate.

92
00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:52.879
<v Speaker 2>Like if the table gets bumped, the top falls.

93
00:04:52.639 --> 00:04:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Over right, a stray magnetic field, a tiny change in heat,

94
00:04:56.720 --> 00:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>the top wobbles, it crashes, and all that quantum de

95
00:05:00.319 --> 00:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>is just gone.

96
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:05.360
<v Speaker 2>So they've stabilized these spins and large groups of molecules before.

97
00:05:05.160 --> 00:05:09.639
<v Speaker 3>Right, they have in large concentrated clusters. But the massive

98
00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:13.879
<v Speaker 3>shift here is that envision isolated and controlled the spin

99
00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:15.920
<v Speaker 3>of one single molecule.

100
00:05:15.560 --> 00:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Which is wild. The precision required for that is just

101
00:05:18.600 --> 00:05:20.439
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to wrap your head around. It's like trying

102
00:05:20.439 --> 00:05:23.160
<v Speaker 2>to pick out a single voice in a roaring stadium crowd.

103
00:05:23.240 --> 00:05:25.399
<v Speaker 3>And not only did they isolate that single voice, they

104
00:05:25.560 --> 00:05:28.519
<v Speaker 3>demonstrated perfect addressability.

105
00:05:27.839 --> 00:05:31.079
<v Speaker 2>Meaning they could repeatedly control and read that one specific

106
00:05:31.199 --> 00:05:33.199
<v Speaker 2>molecule over and over exactly.

107
00:05:33.360 --> 00:05:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Plus they achieved spectral stability lasting over an hour.

108
00:05:36.879 --> 00:05:40.439
<v Speaker 2>Wait, really an hour. In quantum physics, where states normally

109
00:05:40.480 --> 00:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>degrade in like fractions of a second, an hour is

110
00:05:43.680 --> 00:05:45.279
<v Speaker 2>an absolute eternity.

111
00:05:45.319 --> 00:05:48.720
<v Speaker 3>It really is the dividing line between theoretical physics and

112
00:05:48.959 --> 00:05:52.920
<v Speaker 3>applied engineering. Hitting that single molecule level with that kind

113
00:05:52.959 --> 00:05:56.959
<v Speaker 3>of stability means we finally have a viable individual building

114
00:05:56.959 --> 00:05:59.120
<v Speaker 3>block for a real machine.

115
00:05:58.639 --> 00:06:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Which immediately leads me to a pretty big mechanical problem.

116
00:06:01.639 --> 00:06:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what's up.

117
00:06:02.519 --> 00:06:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Well, if we have this incredibly fragile single molecule acting

118
00:06:06.319 --> 00:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>as our spinning top atom, how do we physically interact

119
00:06:10.120 --> 00:06:12.120
<v Speaker 2>with it? I mean, you can't just solder a tiny

120
00:06:12.160 --> 00:06:14.360
<v Speaker 2>copper wire into a single carbon atom.

121
00:06:14.480 --> 00:06:15.079
<v Speaker 3>Definitely not.

122
00:06:15.240 --> 00:06:16.759
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to write data to it or

123
00:06:16.800 --> 00:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>read the data back out, how do you do that

124
00:06:19.160 --> 00:06:21.079
<v Speaker 2>without instantly knocking the top over?

125
00:06:21.279 --> 00:06:24.399
<v Speaker 3>You abandon physical wiring completely. You have to rely on

126
00:06:24.439 --> 00:06:26.160
<v Speaker 3>the optical interface. You use light.

127
00:06:26.279 --> 00:06:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so we are pressing save using lasers.

128
00:06:28.639 --> 00:06:31.759
<v Speaker 3>We are transferring angular momentum using photons. Yeah, but you

129
00:06:31.800 --> 00:06:34.560
<v Speaker 3>can't just scatter these carbine molecules on a glass lide

130
00:06:34.560 --> 00:06:35.800
<v Speaker 3>and shine a flashlight up there.

131
00:06:35.839 --> 00:06:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Obviously not.

132
00:06:36.439 --> 00:06:40.000
<v Speaker 3>They need a highly specialized support system. So what the

133
00:06:40.040 --> 00:06:43.240
<v Speaker 3>researchers do is they take a precursor molecule, which is

134
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:47.480
<v Speaker 3>like a stable, chemically inactive version of the carbine, and

135
00:06:47.519 --> 00:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>they embed it deep inside a host crystal.

136
00:06:51.040 --> 00:06:53.480
<v Speaker 2>I've heard this compared to freezing a seed in an

137
00:06:53.519 --> 00:06:57.199
<v Speaker 2>ice cube tray, but that feels a bit, I don't know,

138
00:06:57.279 --> 00:06:59.600
<v Speaker 2>too passive. It didn't really explain what the crystal is

139
00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:00.160
<v Speaker 2>actually do.

140
00:07:00.399 --> 00:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, A better way to look at it is that

141
00:07:02.040 --> 00:07:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the host crystal acts as a tailored molecular shock absorber.

142
00:07:05.839 --> 00:07:08.839
<v Speaker 3>Oh interesting because at the atomic scale, heat is really

143
00:07:09.040 --> 00:07:12.519
<v Speaker 3>just movement, its atoms vibrating, So if the environment is vibrating,

144
00:07:12.560 --> 00:07:15.560
<v Speaker 3>the molecule gets shaken apart and the quantum data is lost.

145
00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:20.319
<v Speaker 3>But the crystal lattice is structurally matched to that precursor molecule.

146
00:07:20.800 --> 00:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>It acts like a custom foam case around a delicate watch.

147
00:07:24.639 --> 00:07:28.040
<v Speaker 3>It absorbs and dampens all the acoustic and thermal vibrations

148
00:07:28.079 --> 00:07:29.439
<v Speaker 3>from the outside world.

149
00:07:29.279 --> 00:07:32.639
<v Speaker 2>So the molecule is perfectly cradled. But once it's locked

150
00:07:32.639 --> 00:07:34.959
<v Speaker 2>in that shock absorber, how does the light actually turn

151
00:07:35.000 --> 00:07:35.199
<v Speaker 2>it on?

152
00:07:35.480 --> 00:07:38.759
<v Speaker 3>They hit the crystal with a very specific calibrated pulse

153
00:07:38.800 --> 00:07:40.000
<v Speaker 3>of ultraviolet light.

154
00:07:40.120 --> 00:07:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

155
00:07:40.399 --> 00:07:43.480
<v Speaker 3>When the precursor molecule absorbs that UV light, a chemical

156
00:07:43.519 --> 00:07:46.519
<v Speaker 3>bond breaks. It sheds a small fragment, usually in a

157
00:07:46.600 --> 00:07:49.279
<v Speaker 3>nitrogen gas molecule, and what is left behind is the

158
00:07:49.319 --> 00:07:50.600
<v Speaker 3>active carbine, so.

159
00:07:50.519 --> 00:07:53.759
<v Speaker 2>It's positioned exactly where they want it, locked safely inside

160
00:07:53.759 --> 00:07:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the crystal. Precisely, you essentially sculpt the hardware into existence

161
00:07:57.759 --> 00:08:01.560
<v Speaker 2>remotely using a laser pointer is so cool. And once

162
00:08:01.600 --> 00:08:04.879
<v Speaker 2>that carbene is active, they use different wavelengths of light

163
00:08:05.000 --> 00:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to manipulate the spins of those two unsheared electrons. This

164
00:08:09.160 --> 00:08:10.720
<v Speaker 2>is the spin photon interface.

165
00:08:11.040 --> 00:08:13.600
<v Speaker 3>So how does the data transfer actually work there?

166
00:08:13.839 --> 00:08:17.319
<v Speaker 2>When a photon hits the molecule, it doesn't just illuminate it.

167
00:08:17.639 --> 00:08:20.720
<v Speaker 2>A photon actually carries a tiny amount of energy and

168
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:24.959
<v Speaker 2>angular momentum, So when the electron absorbs that photon, it

169
00:08:25.079 --> 00:08:29.399
<v Speaker 2>physically absorbs that momentum, which forces its spin state to change.

170
00:08:29.439 --> 00:08:31.839
<v Speaker 3>And that is how you write the data exactly. So

171
00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:34.360
<v Speaker 3>is reading the data just the reverse process?

172
00:08:34.440 --> 00:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty much.

173
00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

174
00:08:35.559 --> 00:08:38.200
<v Speaker 2>When the electron drops back down to a lower energy state,

175
00:08:38.519 --> 00:08:41.879
<v Speaker 2>it emits a single photon back out, and the wavelength

176
00:08:41.919 --> 00:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and polarization of that emitted photon tell us exactly what

177
00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>state the electron was in.

178
00:08:46.720 --> 00:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>So you are combining a matter quibit the physical electrons

179
00:08:49.840 --> 00:08:52.279
<v Speaker 3>holding the memory with a flying quibot, which is the

180
00:08:52.279 --> 00:08:54.159
<v Speaker 3>photon carrying the information away.

181
00:08:54.039 --> 00:08:57.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, which means the molecule is functioning as both

182
00:08:57.919 --> 00:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the hard drive to store the data locally and the

183
00:09:00.679 --> 00:09:04.039
<v Speaker 2>router to transmit the data out. And if you step

184
00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:06.440
<v Speaker 2>back and look at the whole trajectory of the Internet,

185
00:09:06.840 --> 00:09:11.559
<v Speaker 2>that dual capability is literally everything. It's the holy grail, right,

186
00:09:11.639 --> 00:09:14.759
<v Speaker 2>because the ultimate goal isn't just to have a solitary

187
00:09:14.840 --> 00:09:18.200
<v Speaker 2>quantum computer sitting in a basement somewhere. It's to build

188
00:09:18.200 --> 00:09:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a quantum Internet. We need a way to store quantum

189
00:09:21.080 --> 00:09:25.200
<v Speaker 2>states and securely beam them across fiber optic networks using light.

190
00:09:25.360 --> 00:09:28.320
<v Speaker 3>And this molecular setup inherently speaks the language of a

191
00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:32.440
<v Speaker 3>quantum network because it natively emits those single photons.

192
00:09:32.600 --> 00:09:35.279
<v Speaker 2>But there is a pretty big environmental factor we have

193
00:09:35.279 --> 00:09:35.879
<v Speaker 2>to address here.

194
00:09:36.200 --> 00:09:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Temperature.

195
00:09:36.840 --> 00:09:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because when I was looking at the details of

196
00:09:38.440 --> 00:09:40.759
<v Speaker 2>the milestone, I saw a number that immediately raise a

197
00:09:40.799 --> 00:09:45.159
<v Speaker 2>red flag. They are operating this pinfoton interface at roughly

198
00:09:45.240 --> 00:09:48.200
<v Speaker 2>four point five kelvin, And for context, if you're listening,

199
00:09:48.360 --> 00:09:51.039
<v Speaker 2>four point five kelvin is about minus four hundred and

200
00:09:51.080 --> 00:09:54.159
<v Speaker 2>fifty degrees fahrenheit. It is marginally warmer than the vacuum

201
00:09:54.159 --> 00:09:54.799
<v Speaker 2>of deep space.

202
00:09:54.879 --> 00:09:55.759
<v Speaker 3>It's very cold.

203
00:09:56.080 --> 00:09:59.159
<v Speaker 2>I thought the whole promise of moving away from traditional

204
00:09:59.480 --> 00:10:03.399
<v Speaker 2>quantum ore architectures was that we wouldn't need these massive,

205
00:10:03.480 --> 00:10:05.159
<v Speaker 2>expensive cooling systems anymore.

206
00:10:05.240 --> 00:10:08.879
<v Speaker 3>It does feel a bit contradictory, right, celebrating a revolutionary

207
00:10:08.919 --> 00:10:12.919
<v Speaker 3>new architecture that still requires liquid helium to function. And

208
00:10:13.000 --> 00:10:15.960
<v Speaker 3>it's a completely fair critique of the current demonstration.

209
00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>So to get those pristine hour long stability measurements, they

210
00:10:20.279 --> 00:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>really had to freeze out almost all residual thermal energy.

211
00:10:23.320 --> 00:10:26.759
<v Speaker 3>They did for this specific experiment. Yes, we are still

212
00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:29.840
<v Speaker 3>chained to the freezer. But, and this is important, we

213
00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:32.799
<v Speaker 3>have to separate the conditions of this initial proof of

214
00:10:32.879 --> 00:10:36.720
<v Speaker 3>concept from the fundamental physics of the material itself. Okay,

215
00:10:36.759 --> 00:10:39.799
<v Speaker 3>how so, well, the roadmap for molecules operates on entirely

216
00:10:39.840 --> 00:10:43.039
<v Speaker 3>different rules than the roadmap for solid state quibits like

217
00:10:43.159 --> 00:10:47.279
<v Speaker 3>superconducting loops or synthetic diamonds.

218
00:10:47.360 --> 00:10:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, Because a diamond is just a rigid rock. You

219
00:10:49.399 --> 00:10:52.919
<v Speaker 2>can't exactly negotiate with its thermal properties exactly.

220
00:10:53.240 --> 00:10:56.559
<v Speaker 3>Take nitrogen vacancy centers in diamonds, which have been a

221
00:10:56.600 --> 00:11:00.679
<v Speaker 3>really popular candidate for solid state quantum tech are locked

222
00:11:00.679 --> 00:11:04.240
<v Speaker 3>into this highly rigid crystal lattice. If you want to

223
00:11:04.360 --> 00:11:07.639
<v Speaker 3>change how that diamond reacts to heat, your options are

224
00:11:07.639 --> 00:11:09.240
<v Speaker 3>incredibly limited.

225
00:11:09.120 --> 00:11:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Because you can't alter the diamond structure without literally destroying

226
00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>the diamond.

227
00:11:13.440 --> 00:11:16.840
<v Speaker 3>But molecules offer a scientifically viable pathway to operating at

228
00:11:16.879 --> 00:11:20.080
<v Speaker 3>much milder conditions, potentially even room temperature.

229
00:11:20.360 --> 00:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Wait, really, how is that possible if heat destroys quantum spin.

230
00:11:24.320 --> 00:11:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Because you can chemically engineer the molecule to isolate its

231
00:11:27.320 --> 00:11:30.960
<v Speaker 3>own electrons, you can build insulating layers directly into the

232
00:11:30.960 --> 00:11:35.120
<v Speaker 3>molecular structure. It basically creates a chemical buffer zone around

233
00:11:35.159 --> 00:11:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the sensitive carbione center.

234
00:11:36.720 --> 00:11:39.879
<v Speaker 2>Which naturally leads to the biggest question here, the core

235
00:11:39.960 --> 00:11:43.159
<v Speaker 2>philosophical difference in how we build things. We're talking about

236
00:11:43.240 --> 00:11:45.679
<v Speaker 2>major tech companies that have spent well over a decade

237
00:11:46.200 --> 00:11:49.440
<v Speaker 2>and billions of dollars building superconducting circuits.

238
00:11:49.480 --> 00:11:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, entire supply chains are built around silicon fabrication, So.

239
00:11:53.240 --> 00:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Why would they ever pivot to molecules.

240
00:11:55.320 --> 00:11:57.679
<v Speaker 3>It all comes down to the difference between a top

241
00:11:57.720 --> 00:12:00.240
<v Speaker 3>down approach and a bottom up approach to manifact.

242
00:12:00.559 --> 00:12:05.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's introduce a new analogy for everyone listening current quantum hardware.

243
00:12:06.240 --> 00:12:09.679
<v Speaker 2>The stuff getting all the funding right now is top down. Right,

244
00:12:10.519 --> 00:12:15.200
<v Speaker 2>imagine you have to create a perfectly smooth microscopic sphere.

245
00:12:15.720 --> 00:12:18.879
<v Speaker 2>The top down approach means taking a giant block of marble,

246
00:12:19.120 --> 00:12:22.159
<v Speaker 2>which in this case is a silicon wafer, and using

247
00:12:22.240 --> 00:12:26.559
<v Speaker 2>complex lithography and etching chemicals to carve away everything that

248
00:12:26.720 --> 00:12:27.320
<v Speaker 2>isn't a sphere.

249
00:12:27.399 --> 00:12:31.000
<v Speaker 3>It's entirely subtractive exactly, it's carving, and it is brutally unforgiving.

250
00:12:31.159 --> 00:12:34.440
<v Speaker 3>If there is a single microscopic flaw in the original

251
00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:38.600
<v Speaker 3>crystal lattice of that silicon, or if your etching process

252
00:12:38.720 --> 00:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>overshoots by like a fraction of a nanometer, the quibit

253
00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:43.200
<v Speaker 3>is compromised.

254
00:12:43.240 --> 00:12:44.559
<v Speaker 2>It suffers from decoherence.

255
00:12:44.720 --> 00:12:47.279
<v Speaker 3>Right And because it's a solid carved structure, you can't

256
00:12:47.320 --> 00:12:48.679
<v Speaker 3>just go in and patch it easily.

257
00:12:48.799 --> 00:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>But molecules are bottom up. It isn't carving marble. It's

258
00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:53.559
<v Speaker 2>like building with lego bricks. You start with an empty

259
00:12:53.600 --> 00:12:57.360
<v Speaker 2>table and you chemically snap individual atoms together until you

260
00:12:57.399 --> 00:12:59.440
<v Speaker 2>have built the exact structure you want from scratch.

261
00:12:59.720 --> 00:13:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeses, and that mechanism of synthetic chemistry provides a superpower

262
00:13:04.840 --> 00:13:09.240
<v Speaker 3>that solid state physics simply doesn't have, which is infinite

263
00:13:09.480 --> 00:13:11.399
<v Speaker 3>precise tuneability.

264
00:13:11.759 --> 00:13:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Tuneability. Okay, unpacked that for us.

265
00:13:13.799 --> 00:13:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's say you build a solid state quibit and test

266
00:13:16.279 --> 00:13:18.720
<v Speaker 3>it and you discover, uh, oh, it isn't holding its

267
00:13:18.759 --> 00:13:21.519
<v Speaker 3>memory long enough because it's too sensitive to magnetic noise

268
00:13:21.519 --> 00:13:21.960
<v Speaker 3>in the room.

269
00:13:22.120 --> 00:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Right.

270
00:13:22.600 --> 00:13:25.080
<v Speaker 3>To fix that, you might have to reinvent your entire

271
00:13:25.120 --> 00:13:30.000
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing process, retool your clean rooms, change your etching protocol.

272
00:13:30.120 --> 00:13:34.039
<v Speaker 2>Basically a massive capital expenditure just to tweak the design exactly.

273
00:13:34.159 --> 00:13:36.759
<v Speaker 3>Now, imagine you test a molecular quibit and find the

274
00:13:36.840 --> 00:13:40.840
<v Speaker 3>exact same problem. A synthetic chemist doesn't have to rebuild

275
00:13:40.840 --> 00:13:43.720
<v Speaker 3>a factory. They go back to the lab and literally

276
00:13:43.799 --> 00:13:46.799
<v Speaker 3>swap out an atomic attachment on the molecule itself.

277
00:13:46.840 --> 00:13:48.919
<v Speaker 2>You pop off a blue lego brick and snap on

278
00:13:48.919 --> 00:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>a green one.

279
00:13:49.519 --> 00:13:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Basically, Yeah, those attachments are called ligends or substituents. If

280
00:13:54.360 --> 00:13:55.919
<v Speaker 3>we look back at the diaryl car being we were

281
00:13:55.919 --> 00:13:59.039
<v Speaker 3>talking about earlier, those arrow rings actually act like physical

282
00:13:59.080 --> 00:14:03.799
<v Speaker 3>bumper guards. Yeah, they provide steric hindrance. It's physical bulk

283
00:14:03.960 --> 00:14:07.320
<v Speaker 3>that blocks other reactive molecules from crashing into the sensitive

284
00:14:07.320 --> 00:14:07.960
<v Speaker 3>carbon center.

285
00:14:08.159 --> 00:14:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow. So they act as physical armour.

286
00:14:10.360 --> 00:14:12.879
<v Speaker 3>For the data exactly, and you can tune that armor.

287
00:14:13.279 --> 00:14:18.120
<v Speaker 3>If you attach highly electronegative atoms like fluorine to those ligands,

288
00:14:18.480 --> 00:14:22.720
<v Speaker 3>it physically pulls the electron cloud tighter around the molecule.

289
00:14:22.320 --> 00:14:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Which alters how it interacts with external fields.

290
00:14:24.960 --> 00:14:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, you can adjust the exact optical wavelengths it responds,

291
00:14:28.279 --> 00:14:31.360
<v Speaker 3>to shift its spin interactions, or tailor it to fit

292
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:33.480
<v Speaker 3>perfectly inside different host crystals.

293
00:14:33.559 --> 00:14:37.840
<v Speaker 2>That level of atomic customization changes the entire economic model

294
00:14:37.879 --> 00:14:41.639
<v Speaker 2>of quantum hardware, because if you're building traditional quantum chips,

295
00:14:42.039 --> 00:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>your bottleneck is the clean room. You need billion dollar

296
00:14:45.799 --> 00:14:48.639
<v Speaker 2>ultrasterile facilities just to carve the silicon.

297
00:14:48.919 --> 00:14:52.080
<v Speaker 3>But if you are sympthesizing molecules, the scalability is completely

298
00:14:52.159 --> 00:14:56.039
<v Speaker 3>uncoupled from silicon fabrication. You synthesize them in a liquid solution.

299
00:14:56.240 --> 00:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>So a standard chemical reactor could just brew trillions of identical,

300
00:15:00.360 --> 00:15:03.080
<v Speaker 2>perfectly formed quibits in a single batch.

301
00:15:03.559 --> 00:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And because they aren't bound to a rigid silicon wafer,

302
00:15:07.559 --> 00:15:10.159
<v Speaker 3>the deployment methods completely open.

303
00:15:10.000 --> 00:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Up, meaning you don't have to slot a chip into

304
00:15:12.360 --> 00:15:16.919
<v Speaker 2>a motherboard. You could deposit the quibits as thin films.

305
00:15:17.399 --> 00:15:20.759
<v Speaker 2>You'd literally paint a layer of quantum processors onto a.

306
00:15:20.799 --> 00:15:24.519
<v Speaker 3>Surface exactly using techniques like spin coating, and Vision is

307
00:15:24.559 --> 00:15:28.120
<v Speaker 3>already plotting how to layer these molecular systems directly onto

308
00:15:28.240 --> 00:15:29.639
<v Speaker 3>integrated photonic chips.

309
00:15:29.840 --> 00:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>That is incredibly dense architecture. Right.

310
00:15:32.679 --> 00:15:36.720
<v Speaker 3>You could construct hybrid devices where a traditional silicon backbone

311
00:15:36.840 --> 00:15:40.159
<v Speaker 3>handles the classical routing and power delivery, while a painted

312
00:15:40.240 --> 00:15:42.519
<v Speaker 3>layer of molecules handles the quantum processing.

313
00:15:42.679 --> 00:15:45.679
<v Speaker 2>That kind of industrial versatility really explains why this is

314
00:15:45.720 --> 00:15:49.679
<v Speaker 2>moving out of academic journals and into commercial boardrooms. I mean,

315
00:15:49.960 --> 00:15:53.559
<v Speaker 2>if you're wondering why a microscopic chemistry experiment actually matters

316
00:15:53.600 --> 00:15:56.399
<v Speaker 2>to you, it matters because the market is placing massive

317
00:15:56.440 --> 00:15:57.039
<v Speaker 2>bets on it.

318
00:15:57.159 --> 00:15:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

319
00:15:57.360 --> 00:16:02.519
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely alongside this scientific breakthrough, Envision secured fifty five million

320
00:16:02.559 --> 00:16:04.039
<v Speaker 2>dollars in Series B funding.

321
00:16:04.360 --> 00:16:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Fifty five million is a formidable signal. It demonstrates that

322
00:16:08.759 --> 00:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>institutional investors are looking at the limitations of current superconducting

323
00:16:13.159 --> 00:16:16.600
<v Speaker 3>technology and they're actively funding alternative paradigms, and.

324
00:16:16.600 --> 00:16:19.399
<v Speaker 2>They're using that capital to scale up what they call

325
00:16:19.440 --> 00:16:23.720
<v Speaker 2>their PIQC platform or Pixie. What's so fascinating about their

326
00:16:23.720 --> 00:16:28.080
<v Speaker 2>corporate trajectory is the aggressive pivot. They actually built their

327
00:16:28.120 --> 00:16:30.720
<v Speaker 2>reputation on quantum sensing, right.

328
00:16:30.679 --> 00:16:35.279
<v Speaker 3>Using these skin states to hyperpolarize molecules for advanced MRI imaging.

329
00:16:35.320 --> 00:16:38.639
<v Speaker 2>They're using quantum mechanics to build better medical scanners. And

330
00:16:38.720 --> 00:16:42.080
<v Speaker 2>now they're taking that fifty five million and driving straight

331
00:16:42.080 --> 00:16:45.919
<v Speaker 2>into the hardest problem in technology full glown quantum computing.

332
00:16:46.120 --> 00:16:48.759
<v Speaker 3>And we should be clear transitioning from a highly specialized

333
00:16:48.799 --> 00:16:53.120
<v Speaker 3>sensor to a universal computing platform is a monumental leap

334
00:16:53.159 --> 00:16:55.960
<v Speaker 3>and complexity. We need to ground this in the physical

335
00:16:56.000 --> 00:16:57.159
<v Speaker 3>hurdles that still exists.

336
00:16:57.240 --> 00:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no one is synthesizing a molecular laptop next week,

337
00:17:00.039 --> 00:17:03.159
<v Speaker 2>definitely not. So let's outline the roadblocks. What is physically

338
00:17:03.200 --> 00:17:06.720
<v Speaker 2>preventing us from snapping a billion of these molecules together

339
00:17:06.720 --> 00:17:07.920
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow and just turning them on.

340
00:17:08.319 --> 00:17:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, the universal enemy of all quantum architecture is decoherence.

341
00:17:13.119 --> 00:17:17.119
<v Speaker 3>We establish that the electron spins are like delicate spinning tops.

342
00:17:17.759 --> 00:17:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Decoherence is the process of the environment slowly bleeding the

343
00:17:21.079 --> 00:17:22.839
<v Speaker 3>energy and alignment away.

344
00:17:22.519 --> 00:17:25.799
<v Speaker 2>From those tops, the table getting bumped by stray magnetic fields,

345
00:17:25.799 --> 00:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>cosmic rays or thermal vibrations exactly now.

346
00:17:29.079 --> 00:17:32.319
<v Speaker 3>The current data reveals that these single carbine molecules can

347
00:17:32.400 --> 00:17:37.319
<v Speaker 3>maintain a coherent quantum state for over two milliseconds. Furthermore,

348
00:17:37.480 --> 00:17:40.200
<v Speaker 3>there's spin relaxation time, which is the time it takes

349
00:17:40.200 --> 00:17:42.759
<v Speaker 3>for the top to completely lose its energy and fall over.

350
00:17:43.200 --> 00:17:45.519
<v Speaker 3>Is in the tens of milliseconds, which.

351
00:17:45.359 --> 00:17:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Sounds incredibly fast to a regular person, but in the

352
00:17:48.200 --> 00:17:52.079
<v Speaker 2>realm of quantum operations, where a single calculation takes nanoseconds,

353
00:17:52.359 --> 00:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>two milliseconds actually provides a pretty substantial window to execute algorithms.

354
00:17:57.359 --> 00:18:00.599
<v Speaker 3>It is an excellent baseline for a single molecule, but

355
00:18:00.680 --> 00:18:03.640
<v Speaker 3>to build a fault tolerant computer, one that can correct

356
00:18:03.640 --> 00:18:07.400
<v Speaker 3>its own errors faster than they occur, those coherence times

357
00:18:07.480 --> 00:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>must be extended significantly. However, the true nightmare scenario isn't

358
00:18:12.039 --> 00:18:15.880
<v Speaker 3>managing one quibbit. It's the orchestration of the two quibit.

359
00:18:15.680 --> 00:18:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Gait, meaning getting two isolated molecules to talk to each

360
00:18:19.400 --> 00:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>other without destroying each other's data.

361
00:18:21.599 --> 00:18:25.319
<v Speaker 3>Yes, consider the physics of a high density molecular chip.

362
00:18:25.839 --> 00:18:29.119
<v Speaker 3>If you pack millions of molecules tightly together so they

363
00:18:29.160 --> 00:18:33.240
<v Speaker 3>can interact quickly, their individual magnetic fields start to interfere,

364
00:18:33.359 --> 00:18:34.279
<v Speaker 3>you get crosstalk.

365
00:18:34.839 --> 00:18:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh, so they jam each other's.

366
00:18:36.519 --> 00:18:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Signals, right, But if you space them too far apart

367
00:18:39.920 --> 00:18:43.880
<v Speaker 3>to prevent interference, they can't effectively entangle with each other

368
00:18:44.039 --> 00:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>to process operations.

369
00:18:45.599 --> 00:18:48.480
<v Speaker 2>So you have a thread and impossible needle maintaining the

370
00:18:48.519 --> 00:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>ability to target one specific molecule with a laser while

371
00:18:52.400 --> 00:18:55.680
<v Speaker 2>simultaneously forcing it to entangle its skin state with a

372
00:18:55.720 --> 00:18:58.759
<v Speaker 2>neighbor and shielding both of them from the noise of

373
00:18:58.799 --> 00:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>the millions of other molecule surrounding them.

374
00:19:01.079 --> 00:19:04.440
<v Speaker 3>It is an incredibly delicate balance of proximity and isolation.

375
00:19:04.599 --> 00:19:07.759
<v Speaker 2>But you know, exploring these hurdles reveals an incredible, almost

376
00:19:07.839 --> 00:19:12.599
<v Speaker 2>poetic irony about the entire quantum computing industry. The feedback loop, Yeah,

377
00:19:12.640 --> 00:19:15.079
<v Speaker 2>the virtuous cycle. If you look back over the last

378
00:19:15.079 --> 00:19:17.839
<v Speaker 2>twenty years, one of the ultimate goals of quantum computing,

379
00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:21.279
<v Speaker 2>the main reason governments even wanted to build them, was

380
00:19:21.319 --> 00:19:22.559
<v Speaker 2>to simulate chemistry.

381
00:19:22.880 --> 00:19:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Right, because classical computers simply lack the processing power to

382
00:19:26.200 --> 00:19:29.799
<v Speaker 3>map the quantum states of large molecules. The math scales

383
00:19:29.880 --> 00:19:33.000
<v Speaker 3>exponentially and just chokes traditional processors.

384
00:19:33.039 --> 00:19:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, we spend decades trying to build artificial quantum computers

385
00:19:37.039 --> 00:19:40.079
<v Speaker 2>out of silicon, lasers and super cooled metal, just so

386
00:19:40.119 --> 00:19:44.119
<v Speaker 2>we could finally simulate complex molecules. And now the molecules

387
00:19:44.160 --> 00:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>themselves are replacing the silicon. The chemistry we wanted to

388
00:19:47.720 --> 00:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>simulate has literally become the hardware.

389
00:19:50.279 --> 00:19:54.440
<v Speaker 3>It initiates a feedback loop of pure technological acceleration. The

390
00:19:54.480 --> 00:19:58.480
<v Speaker 3>better our current generation of computers gets at modeling molecular behavior,

391
00:19:58.799 --> 00:20:02.920
<v Speaker 3>the better we become at designed optimal molecular quibits. Oh wow, Yeah,

392
00:20:03.000 --> 00:20:05.920
<v Speaker 3>we can simulate a carbine with the perfect ligen detachments

393
00:20:05.920 --> 00:20:08.720
<v Speaker 3>in a computer before we ever synthesize it in a lab.

394
00:20:09.240 --> 00:20:12.920
<v Speaker 2>So synthesize that perfect molecule becomes more powerful quantum computer,

395
00:20:13.200 --> 00:20:16.599
<v Speaker 2>which in turn simulates an even more robust molecular architecture.

396
00:20:16.640 --> 00:20:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. We are using the physics to solve the chemistry

397
00:20:19.759 --> 00:20:20.920
<v Speaker 3>to build better physics.

398
00:20:21.079 --> 00:20:24.160
<v Speaker 2>That is amazing. Yeah, and looking ahead toward twenty thirty,

399
00:20:24.440 --> 00:20:27.519
<v Speaker 2>this clearly signals the end of a monolithic approach to hardware.

400
00:20:27.920 --> 00:20:30.640
<v Speaker 3>The narrative that there will be one single winner in

401
00:20:30.680 --> 00:20:34.480
<v Speaker 3>the quantum hardware race is totally obsolete. We are moving

402
00:20:34.519 --> 00:20:38.400
<v Speaker 3>away from the idea that superconducting circuits will just eradicate

403
00:20:38.480 --> 00:20:44.119
<v Speaker 3>everything else. We are entering an era of deep technological diversification.

404
00:20:43.680 --> 00:20:46.640
<v Speaker 2>A diverse ecosystem, So you might see a future data

405
00:20:46.680 --> 00:20:50.880
<v Speaker 2>center where super cooled solid state systems are handling specific,

406
00:20:51.279 --> 00:20:53.400
<v Speaker 2>massive algorithmic heavy lifting.

407
00:20:53.160 --> 00:20:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Right while photonic systems are managing the secure routing of

408
00:20:56.319 --> 00:20:57.440
<v Speaker 3>data across.

409
00:20:57.119 --> 00:21:01.079
<v Speaker 2>The network, and these highly tunable synthetic molecular systems are

410
00:21:01.079 --> 00:21:06.160
<v Speaker 2>deployed alongside them for hyperdense memory storage, localized processing, or

411
00:21:06.200 --> 00:21:08.279
<v Speaker 2>massively parallel chemical simulations.

412
00:21:08.359 --> 00:21:11.480
<v Speaker 3>The precision of bottom up organic chemistry has finally caught

413
00:21:11.559 --> 00:21:15.119
<v Speaker 3>up to the rigorous demands of quantum physics. These synthesized,

414
00:21:15.160 --> 00:21:20.200
<v Speaker 3>customizable molecules are legitimately positioning themselves as the foundational atoms

415
00:21:20.240 --> 00:21:21.799
<v Speaker 3>of tomorrow's machines.

416
00:21:21.480 --> 00:21:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Which leaves us with the truly profound kind of mind

417
00:21:24.799 --> 00:21:26.880
<v Speaker 2>bending question about the future of human labor in the

418
00:21:26.880 --> 00:21:30.079
<v Speaker 2>tech sector. Think about it. If the supercomputers of tomorrow

419
00:21:30.119 --> 00:21:34.039
<v Speaker 2>are no longer etched in massive silicon foundries by electrical engineers,

420
00:21:34.440 --> 00:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>but are instead synthesized molecule by molecule and chemical reactors,

421
00:21:38.960 --> 00:21:40.599
<v Speaker 2>what does that mean for the people who will have

422
00:21:40.640 --> 00:21:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to build and program them. If the hardware is chemistry, well,

423
00:21:44.200 --> 00:21:47.079
<v Speaker 2>the next generation of visionary computer scientists actually need to

424
00:21:47.079 --> 00:21:50.559
<v Speaker 2>be trained as synthetic chemists. It is an incredible shift

425
00:21:50.599 --> 00:21:53.440
<v Speaker 2>in how we build the future. Until next time, keep

426
00:21:53.519 --> 00:21:54.599
<v Speaker 2>questioning what's possible.
