Speaker 1: Years, I've been saying that calling Glaine Maxwell as socialite
Speaker 1: in the legacy media is ridiculous, especially when you don't
Speaker 1: go into context about what she is being accused of.
Speaker 1: And the legacy media just continued and continued to call
Speaker 1: her a socialite, never brought up the fact that she
Speaker 1: was also accused of being involved in the actual abuse right. Instead,
Speaker 1: we always got Jeffrey Epstein's Madam, Jeffrey Epstein's pimp socialite.
Speaker 1: With that connotation, you are basically saying that these survivors
Speaker 1: were prostitutes. And I've been bringing it up for quite
Speaker 1: some time because isn't it the media that tells us
Speaker 1: words matter? And then they have the audacity to hop
Speaker 1: on to their computers or whatever it is they're pumping
Speaker 1: their content out from and start yapping away about how
Speaker 1: Glene Maxwell is a socialite. No, she's not a socialite.
Speaker 1: She's a child abuser, a sex trafficker, a general all
Speaker 1: around scusbag, and quite possibly a bipedal serpent. So now
Speaker 1: that she has been convicted, one of the first things
Speaker 1: I tweeted out was that it's time for the legacy
Speaker 1: media to start calling her what she is, and that
Speaker 1: is not a socialite. Well, there's an article out today
Speaker 1: from The Guardian and the author of that article, Joan Smith,
Speaker 1: is picking up the rally and cry and she's saying
Speaker 1: the same exact thing. Let's call Maxwell what she is,
Speaker 1: a sex trafficker. And I'm very thankful that's somebody like
Speaker 1: Joan Smith is, you know, smelling the coffee if you will.
Speaker 1: It's long time coming for the legacy media to call
Speaker 1: these people what they are. And when you talk about
Speaker 1: Les Wexner, he should also be talked about in the
Speaker 1: same kind of light. Less Wexner, Victoria's secret founder. No
Speaker 1: Less Wexner accused friend of Jeffrey Epstein, enabler of Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 1: and accused of taking part in his sex trafficking ring.
Speaker 1: How hard is that to put that down in the newspaper?
Speaker 1: What are you all scared? I mean, it's illogical almost
Speaker 1: that the legacy media was so gung ho on calling
Speaker 1: this lady a socialite for so long, even though there
Speaker 1: were mountains of evidence. Now, don't get me wrong, there
Speaker 1: were some people in the print media who called out
Speaker 1: Glen's nonsense for the whole entire run. There were some
Speaker 1: people in the print media who weren't buying any of
Speaker 1: her bullshit. And one of those outlets that has done
Speaker 1: a very good job throughout this whole entire thing, even
Speaker 1: though I might not agree with a lot of their
Speaker 1: positions on other topics, is The Daily. They did a
Speaker 1: fantastic job covering this as far as the print media goes,
Speaker 1: and they have done a phenomenal job of framing Glaine
Speaker 1: Maxwell as what she is now there have been plenty
Speaker 1: of other outlets that have refused to do it. Moving forward,
Speaker 1: I'm very interested to see which ones of these outlets
Speaker 1: actually fall in line here and call her what she
Speaker 1: is and not a socialite, because again, it matters right
Speaker 1: when you're talking about Glene Maxwell. The way the legacy
Speaker 1: media has leading up to all of this, they would
Speaker 1: frame it like she was just some socialite or that
Speaker 1: this was some kind of madam situation where she was
Speaker 1: just providing prostitutes for Jeffrey Epstein. That's the way the
Speaker 1: legacy media framed it for a very long time. And
Speaker 1: then you wonder why people had no idea the true
Speaker 1: scope of what was going on here. You wonder why
Speaker 1: I'm getting emails every single day from people who had
Speaker 1: no clue the true scope, and it all goes back
Speaker 1: to the legacy media not doing their job. And I
Speaker 1: know I got rant about that here on the podcast,
Speaker 1: but it's very important that you all understand that the
Speaker 1: legacy media, this version of it anyway, is not there
Speaker 1: as an ally for us, the people right the fourth
Speaker 1: Estate is always supposed to be a bulwark between us
Speaker 1: and the most powerful. They're the ones that are supposed
Speaker 1: to be holding these people responsible, not independent content creators
Speaker 1: who are doing it out of their own pocket. Instead,
Speaker 1: the legacy media would much rather yap about how your
Speaker 1: cousin Tom hates you because he voted for Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: or your mom is some crazy racist because she voted
Speaker 1: for insert politician here. That's crazy stuff to me. Okay,
Speaker 1: the legacy media gaslighting everybody, getting everybody wound up with
Speaker 1: their rage porn about how everybody should hate each other. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: they're not breaking it down, they're not giving you the details,
Speaker 1: and they're not informing you of the real issues at hand,
Speaker 1: such as Jeffrey Epstein, Glene Maxwell, and the true scope
Speaker 1: of what they were up to. The good news is
Speaker 1: people are starting to wake up and just take a
Speaker 1: look at how popular a lot of independent content creators
Speaker 1: and investigative journalists have become as opposed to the legacy media.
Speaker 1: I mean, they have no one to blame but themselves either.
Speaker 1: By the way, all of these pearl clutching blue check
Speaker 1: marks on Twitter and elsewhere who get up there and
Speaker 1: preach down to everybody else well at the same time
Speaker 1: providing cover for people like Epstein and Maxwell. So it's
Speaker 1: about time that we stop calling the Lane Maxwell a socialite,
Speaker 1: and it's time that we start calling her what she is,
Speaker 1: a sex trafficker and a child abuser. And the author
Speaker 1: of this article from the Guardian is doing exactly that.
Speaker 1: This article is from the Guardian and the author is
Speaker 1: Joan Smith. For years she was described as a socialite,
Speaker 1: a word that conceals more than it explains. Socialites are
Speaker 1: almost always women from a wealthy, if not an aristocratic background,
Speaker 1: and they're defining characteristic. Characteristic is being photographed with famous people.
Speaker 1: Imagine these socialites and I'm using air quotes come from
Speaker 1: some of the most powerful families in the world, scions
Speaker 1: in the world of business and politics, and you name it.
Speaker 1: And what are they known for? What do they use
Speaker 1: their great power? Their great influence. They're great well for
Speaker 1: to become more famous, to get in more pictures, to
Speaker 1: extend their social worth. Meanwhile, have any of you taken
Speaker 1: a ride down a major thoroughfare in any major city
Speaker 1: around the country and seeing the absolute abject poverty that
Speaker 1: these people are living in. Meanwhile, we have a socialite
Speaker 1: class in this country who are basically getting paid millions
Speaker 1: and millions of dollars to get picted to take pictures
Speaker 1: places with people. And these are the people that others
Speaker 1: are looking up to. Sorry, not me. I think all
Speaker 1: of these people are weird. I think the whole entire
Speaker 1: so called polite society is corrupt and polluted, and anyone
Speaker 1: who's aspiring to be a quote unquote socialite should probably
Speaker 1: have their brains checked. Glenn Maxwell fitted the bill, appearing
Speaker 1: in photos with everyone from Donald Trump to Elon Musk
Speaker 1: to Prince Andrew. But being a socialite is not a job,
Speaker 1: and it was unclear how she financed her opulent lifestyle,
Speaker 1: especially after the death of her father, Robert. Eh. It's
Speaker 1: no shock to me. We all know the deal. She
Speaker 1: was set up with Jeffrey Epstein for this express purpose,
Speaker 1: for them to work hand in hand to provide compromise. Again,
Speaker 1: the legacy media refuses to touch that, right. They refuse
Speaker 1: to really go down the real rabbit holes that matter.
Speaker 1: And for me, I'll just let my work speak for itself.
Speaker 1: We're going on three years here now with over fifteen
Speaker 1: hundred episodes in the catalog, and the proof is in
Speaker 1: the pudding. The question is when's the legacy media going
Speaker 1: to catch up to catch up to us about this.
Speaker 1: It took them forever to catch up about a bunch
Speaker 1: of other things, so I'm guessing it's going to take
Speaker 1: forever for them to catch up here as well, because
Speaker 1: they've been lapped right the stuff. The legacy media is
Speaker 1: all shocked about things. People were Oh wow, I had
Speaker 1: no idea about stuff we've been talking about for three years.
Speaker 1: And I don't just mean me. I'm talking about people
Speaker 1: who have been following this case closely. And when it
Speaker 1: comes to Glene Maxwell's lifestyle and the way she got
Speaker 1: her money, it's very obvious how she got her money.
Speaker 1: She was working hand in hand with Jeffrey Epstein. He
Speaker 1: was engaging in all kinds of financial malfeasance all over
Speaker 1: the globe, and at the same time, Maxwell's role within
Speaker 1: the enterprise was bringing her in a bunch of bucks
Speaker 1: as well. So she wasn't a socialite as far as say,
Speaker 1: like a Paris Hilton, right, somebody who's just gone around
Speaker 1: taking pictures getting drunk and acting the fool. That wasn't
Speaker 1: what Maxwell was doing. She was opening doors for Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein that would have never been opened for him. And
Speaker 1: that all goes back to her upbringing generational wealth the
Speaker 1: Old Boys Club of England, if you will. Over recent weeks,
Speaker 1: during her trial on sex tra afficking charges in a
Speaker 1: New York courtroom, the answer became clear. Maxwell's wealth came
Speaker 1: from her erstwhile boyfriend, See they still don't get it right,
Speaker 1: from her business partner and partner in crime, Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 1: who gave her at least thirty point seven million over
Speaker 1: a period of eight years. Way more than that, folks. Now,
Speaker 1: can I prove that to you with receipts? I can't, Okay,
Speaker 1: But when you look at the hustle Epstein was up
Speaker 1: to in the Virgin Islands and elsewhere, the gratz hustle,
Speaker 1: the every other kind of IPO hustle, you can imagine
Speaker 1: every kind of money stash. You can imagine it was
Speaker 1: all occurring offshore. And I have a hard time believing
Speaker 1: that the only money Jeffrey Epstein or Galayan Maxwell had
Speaker 1: is what they told the federal government that they were holding.
Speaker 1: You mean to tell me they didn't have a bag
Speaker 1: in reserve, Stop it. These people always have a bag
Speaker 1: in reserve. By all accounts, Maxwell went from being in
Speaker 1: love with him to discovering that her usefulness lay elsewhere
Speaker 1: in providing a steady stream of young girls to satisfy
Speaker 1: his depraved sexual appetite. And this again is where they
Speaker 1: missed the point. They get a little bit of it right,
Speaker 1: But it wasn't just his sexual appetite that was being
Speaker 1: addressed here. His proclivities were perfect for the intelligence services.
Speaker 1: This is exactly what the intelligence services love. A guy
Speaker 1: like Epstein in the financial sector who has proclivities such
Speaker 1: as his. Get that guy involved in your schemes and
Speaker 1: your plots and your honeypot operation and forget it. The
Speaker 1: sky is the limit, as we have seen here. And
Speaker 1: for those of you who think that, come on, the
Speaker 1: government will never be in bed with a guy like
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein. I mean, just off the top of my head,
Speaker 1: a couple of people here that the government's been in
Speaker 1: bed with in the past. Whitey Bulger, Sammy the Bulgravano,
Speaker 1: both men serial killers, both men absolute murderers and scumbags,
Speaker 1: and the government had no problem getting in bed with
Speaker 1: them because the means justified the end. And if you
Speaker 1: think the same didn't happen with Jeffrey Epstein, I don't
Speaker 1: know what to tell you at this point. I know
Speaker 1: we have certain people out there. Oh there's no intelligence
Speaker 1: ties with Jeffrey Epstein, that's absurd. Those are the very
Speaker 1: same people, folks, remember that were probably pitching you that
Speaker 1: the weapons of mass destruction lion Iraq was right and
Speaker 1: that the whole entire Russia Russia fiasco was legit. It's
Speaker 1: all bs and political theater with these people. The girls
Speaker 1: trusted her, thinking of her as an older sister, and
Speaker 1: only realized later that they had been betrayed. The socialite,
Speaker 1: co conspirator, general all around scuzbag, convicted sex trafficker, child
Speaker 1: abuser was actually a procure a word with deservedly unpleasant connotations.
Speaker 1: You see, she was more than that. As much as
Speaker 1: I appreciate the author here Joan Smith taking up the
Speaker 1: mantle and talking about how she's not a socialite. Again,
Speaker 1: she doesn't go far enough. Again, she's watching her words.
Speaker 1: You notice they never watch their words when they're attacking
Speaker 1: their political opponents. However, right it does not sit easily
Speaker 1: with Maxwell's glamorous lifestyle, the planes, helicopters, and visits to
Speaker 1: Epstein's private islands. Many well known people will surely be
Speaker 1: regretting that they ever moved in the same circles as
Speaker 1: Maxwell and Epstein, let alone appear in the aircraft logs
Speaker 1: revealed in court. Indeed, Maxwell's conviction last week on five
Speaker 1: charges seems to have created a kind of cognitive dissonance
Speaker 1: in some circles, as though such things simply should not
Speaker 1: happen to a woman with a degree from balliol I
Speaker 1: mean again, this is the person people have of the
Speaker 1: so called elite, and that's a perception that they have
Speaker 1: fostered for years and years and years. But those of
Speaker 1: us who know the deal, we understand that the so
Speaker 1: called elite, they're more depraved than just about anybody else.
Speaker 1: I don't care where you have your degree from, I
Speaker 1: don't care what kind of charitable work you have done.
Speaker 1: If you're running around with Jeffrey Epstein, Gallainne, Maxwell, and
Speaker 1: the rest of them, You, my friend, are on the
Speaker 1: list as a piece of shit. Well connected individuals who
Speaker 1: rarely display an interest in America American penal policy have
Speaker 1: complained bitterly about Maxwell's prison conditions, as though she is
Speaker 1: in a different class from other inmates. See this is
Speaker 1: what I've been talking about this for a while. Anyone
Speaker 1: who knows people who have been to prison, anyone who
Speaker 1: has loved ones who have been to prison, understand right
Speaker 1: away that all of Maxwell's bullshit was exactly that bullshit.
Speaker 1: She wasn't treated no different than anybody else, and she
Speaker 1: does not want to be on the main line. And
Speaker 1: then all of a sudden, all of these so called elite,
Speaker 1: all of these people who were in Maxwell's circle or
Speaker 1: Epstein's circle, whatever you want to call it, all of
Speaker 1: these people all of a sudden care about how jail
Speaker 1: reforms going or what's going on in the prison systems
Speaker 1: in the United States. But the thing is, where were
Speaker 1: they before Maxwell was arrested? Where were they when people
Speaker 1: like KHALIFH. Browder were rotting away in prison. Siblings have
Speaker 1: rallied around insisting that they cannot accept the Jerry's guilty verdicts,
Speaker 1: Although that seems to be more of an expression of
Speaker 1: denial than in any real expectation that she will win
Speaker 1: an appeal. Well, you can't expect them to say anything else, right,
Speaker 1: there's no way that she's winning any appeal, Folks. I
Speaker 1: don't buy it, zero chance. Just like I didn't think
Speaker 1: she'd win her trial, I don't think she'll win any
Speaker 1: kind of appeal here. She was not treated any differently,
Speaker 1: she was not treated wrongly, and to be honest with you,
Speaker 1: she got more of a fair shake than just about
Speaker 1: anybody else. We know from rape Childs that the public
Speaker 1: imagination struggles to accommodate individuals who challenge stereotypes about sex offenders,
Speaker 1: whether it is the good looking date who turns out
Speaker 1: to be a rapist or the socialite who facilitates a pedophile.
Speaker 1: It's easier to believe terrible things about Rosemary West, a
Speaker 1: don't be working class woman who helped lure girls into
Speaker 1: her husband's car and joined in his abuse of them.
Speaker 1: Then an heiress who once rested her boot on the
Speaker 1: thigh of an entranced Boris Johnson. See for me, it's
Speaker 1: not and I hope that That's one thing that all
Speaker 1: of you folks take from this podcast. If you take
Speaker 1: nothing else from it, please take this. Those who would
Speaker 1: rule over you despise you. Those who would rule over
Speaker 1: you are not these great people. And when I think
Speaker 1: about people like this, I don't think about working class people.
Speaker 1: I think about people like Maxwell and Epstein and John
Speaker 1: Luke Brunel and Darren Hindyke and the rest of them.
Speaker 1: Fred and Rose West committed horrific crimes together, torturing their
Speaker 1: victims as well as killing them. But Fred West was
Speaker 1: already a murderer when he chose fifteen year old Rosemary Letts,
Speaker 1: who had a horrendous history of child sexual abuse, as
Speaker 1: his accomplice. Yeah, well, that's all fine and well, but
Speaker 1: Maxwell doesn't have that to fall back on, that kind
Speaker 1: of armor to wrap herself in. She was from great privilege,
Speaker 1: she was born into the Maxwell family. You want to
Speaker 1: talk about having money, talk about having dough and power
Speaker 1: and reach. It doesn't get much more elite than that.
Speaker 1: So any kind of position that's being taken that Maxwell's
Speaker 1: enny kind of victim, or that she couldn't stop Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein if she wanted to, is bullshit. In my opinion,
Speaker 1: she could have stopped him, she could have rated on him,
Speaker 1: she could have went to the authorities. Instead, she continued
Speaker 1: to do it with them and continue to benefit from it.
Speaker 1: Predators have a sixth sense when it comes to choosing
Speaker 1: co conspirators. Maxwell was a grown woman when she met
Speaker 1: Epstein and fully responsible for the choices she would go
Speaker 1: on to make. But it is striking that their relationship
Speaker 1: seems to have begun around the time of her father's
Speaker 1: fatal fall from the yacht to be named after her,
Speaker 1: the Lady Golaine. That's bs as well, again the legacy
Speaker 1: media not knowing what they're talking about, and with all
Speaker 1: respect to Joan Smith, she could probably do with listening
Speaker 1: to the podcast for a little while before her next article,
Speaker 1: because this has nothing to do with that. Maxwell was
Speaker 1: never a victim. Maxwell and Epstein met before Maxwell's dad died,
Speaker 1: in fact, and the whole entire thing was a plot
Speaker 1: set up for them to work in conjunction with each other.
Speaker 1: It's no excuse to say that the discovery that her
Speaker 1: father was a fraudster so soon after his death would
Speaker 1: have shaken Maxwell to her foundations. But it may be
Speaker 1: that Epstein recognized her weaknesses, seized his chance, and got
Speaker 1: access to an address book that included the queen's favorite son,
Speaker 1: the Duke of York. Again, sorry, Joan Smith, that's not
Speaker 1: gonna work. All right, your underhanded protection of Maxwell, You're
Speaker 1: not gonna go over so well. She's a scumback. She
Speaker 1: was not manipulated, She was very educated. At any time
Speaker 1: she could have bounced. At any time, she could have
Speaker 1: ratted Jeffrey Epstein out. She chose not to. She chose
Speaker 1: not to, And now it's time to reap the storm.
Speaker 1: Maxwell's connections boosted his sense of impunity, which is perhaps
Speaker 1: the single most important factor in allowing predators to get
Speaker 1: away with their crimes. He would later describe Maxwell in
Speaker 1: humiliating terms as an ex girlfriend who had fallen on
Speaker 1: hard times, framing himself as the benefactor who had allowed
Speaker 1: her to live the style to which she had become accustomed. Again,
Speaker 1: all part of the plan, All part of the plot.
Speaker 1: I urge you to watch the show Americans if you
Speaker 1: want to see a better explanation of how these kinds
Speaker 1: of people who work in the world of spycraft or
Speaker 1: who are assets, how they conduct themselves. They'll set it
Speaker 1: up as if there's a married couple with kids, the
Speaker 1: whole thing, and it's all a plot. That's how the
Speaker 1: intelligent services work. I know a lot of us don't
Speaker 1: want to think about the intelligent services too deeply because
Speaker 1: it's terrifying. But I'm here to tell you everything that
Speaker 1: Edward Snowden was telling you, folks. He wasn't lying, and
Speaker 1: Julian Assange he wasn't lying either. There's a reason that
Speaker 1: the American government wants him so bad, folks. The mystery
Speaker 1: surrounding the source of Epstein's wealth has led to comparisons
Speaker 1: with Jay Gatsby, the enigmatic main character in Scott Fitzgerald's novel,
Speaker 1: but such mythology lends a suspicious glamour to assorted crimes. No,
Speaker 1: none of that either, folks. I don't know who's calling
Speaker 1: him the great Gatsby, more like the great Ratsby, more
Speaker 1: like the great Moron. The dude was getting his money
Speaker 1: because he knew the hustle. He knew the Gratz hustle.
Speaker 1: He was getting IPOs from Goldman Sachs, and he was
Speaker 1: on the team. Right when you're on the team, you
Speaker 1: get the hookup, folks, You got the Gratz hustle going
Speaker 1: on where you're basically guaranteed a buyback of the stock
Speaker 1: purchases you make by the bank. It's all a hustle
Speaker 1: for rich people to get richer. And I've been talking
Speaker 1: about this for three years now. The financial angle of
Speaker 1: this crime is never discussed enough, and nobody really dives
Speaker 1: in hard enough. It is a depressing fact that women
Speaker 1: who identify with powerful men often share their misogyny and
Speaker 1: reflect it back in a desperate quest for approval. Profiles
Speaker 1: of Epstein remarked on the disturbing fact that his homes
Speaker 1: were full of teenage girls. They're nothing, these girls. Maxwell
Speaker 1: once told a confidant. They are trash. And that's how
Speaker 1: Maxwell and Epstein thought about all of us, not just
Speaker 1: the girls. We're all pleads to them, folks, our robber
Speaker 1: baron class, meaning our political class, and people like Epstein
Speaker 1: and Maxwell. If you only understood the low opinion they
Speaker 1: had of you, you would never ever again carry water
Speaker 1: for these pieces of shit. You would never ever again
Speaker 1: get on Twitter and talk shit about this or that
Speaker 1: or the other thing, because in reality, the real enemy,
Speaker 1: the real issue at hand, folks, are these kinds of
Speaker 1: people Maxwell Epstein, Their friends. It's not your uncle, it's
Speaker 1: not your aunt, it's not your friend from high school.
Speaker 1: It must have occurred to Maxwell by now that the
Speaker 1: two men she put absolute faith in her father and
Speaker 1: or ex lover, both left her to face the music
Speaker 1: after their apparent suicides, and for what. The columnist Barbara Amiel,
Speaker 1: who was married to the former newspaper magnet Conrad Black,
Speaker 1: recalls a conversation that shows Maxwell in an unexpected and
Speaker 1: highly unflattering light. I thought I'm in charge of more
Speaker 1: laboratories and bathrooms than you are, Maxwell suddenly said, as
Speaker 1: the two women were walking along the beach. While Amiel
Speaker 1: thought about it, Maxwell reminded her to include those on planes.
Speaker 1: Thirty nine, said Amiel, and Maxwell's face lit up. I win,
Speaker 1: she exclaimed. Uh, well, I don't even understand that line
Speaker 1: of thinking. I mean, imagine being so rich or whatever
Speaker 1: that you're arguing about who has more bathrooms under your
Speaker 1: thumb sounds like a great argument to have. Questions about
Speaker 1: Maxwell's relationship with Epstein have now been cleared up. She
Speaker 1: procured girls for him, and it speaks volumes about our
Speaker 1: moral compass or lack of it, that she evidently cared
Speaker 1: more about the number of laboratories in his mansions than
Speaker 1: the vulnerable teenagers she exposed to sexual assault and rape. Well,
Speaker 1: not only that, not only that, she exposed that she
Speaker 1: took part in Miss Smith, that she helped, that she
Speaker 1: had literally hands on So when we talk about Maxwell,
Speaker 1: we need to remember that as well. She's not just
Speaker 1: some procure. She's not a madam, she's not a pimp. Okay,
Speaker 1: she is a child abuser, a sex trafficker, and a scummy,
Speaker 1: pitiful excuse for a human being. All Right, folks, that's
Speaker 1: gonna wrap it up for this morning. Now. I'll be
Speaker 1: back later on, obviously with more context episodes, and we'll
Speaker 1: see about later on tonight. We might do a nighttime
Speaker 1: episode tonight nighttime Update. I have a couple of articles
Speaker 1: I want to get to. But starting tomorrow, we're gonna
Speaker 1: be hitting the ground running, folks. We'll be here every day.
Speaker 1: We'll be back on Beyond the Horizon every day, and
Speaker 1: uh yeah, we're gonna keep the story going because there
Speaker 1: is a lot to get to, so help all of
Speaker 1: you folks. Enjoy your Sunday. And with that said, you
Speaker 1: can find me on Twitter, you can find me via email,
Speaker 1: and to do that you can email me at Bobby
Speaker 1: Kapucci at ProtonMail dot com. That's bo bb Y c
Speaker 1: ap you Cci at ProtonMail dot com, or you can
Speaker 1: find me on Twitter at Bobby underscore c ap u Cci.
Speaker 1: All of the links that we discussed can be found
Speaker 1: in the description box. What's up everyone, and welcome back
Speaker 1: to the Epstein Chronicles. On today's episode, we have an
Speaker 1: article from the Deli Mal and this article is talking
Speaker 1: about Glainne Maxwell and her disheveled look inside of prison.
Speaker 1: And as much as I like to pile on when
Speaker 1: it comes to Glainne Maxwell, what do we expect her
Speaker 1: to be? Fully done up? Here? With her hair did
Speaker 1: and her nails all done up? So I can't really
Speaker 1: blame the lady for looking disheveled. If you were going
Speaker 1: to be sitting in prison till you were about eighty
Speaker 1: years old, I'm guessing you'd be pretty disheveled too. Today's
Speaker 1: article is from the Delimel and the headline Gallaine Maxwell
Speaker 1: is seen looking disheveled in US prison as Epstein's madam
Speaker 1: works on a memoir to combat misinformation about her ties
Speaker 1: to the disgraced financier On What planet does Glene Maxwell
Speaker 1: think that some sort of memoir is going to change anything.
Speaker 1: She had a whole last trial, a whole lead up
Speaker 1: to that trial, and decades to let everybody know what
Speaker 1: was going on. She didn't let anybody know about anything,
Speaker 1: And now all of a sudden we should all be
Speaker 1: sitting on pins and needles waiting for her to drop
Speaker 1: her memoir to tell us what really happened. Breaking news, Glane,
Speaker 1: we all know what happened. You're a bipedle serpent, a
Speaker 1: child abuser, a human trafficker, and you're exactly where you belong.
Speaker 1: So save all the other bullshit for somebody else, because
Speaker 1: you can miss me with all of it. The authors
Speaker 1: of this article are Matthew Lodge and Ben Ashford. A
Speaker 1: disheveled Glenn Maxwell has been pictured walking behind bars as
Speaker 1: she reportedly works on a memoir to combat public knowledge
Speaker 1: about her ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The sixty two year
Speaker 1: old who is serving a twenty year sentence at FCI
Speaker 1: Tallahassee in Florida, was spotted with her hands balled up
Speaker 1: inside her sleeves as she stepped outside for some exercise.
Speaker 1: The disgrace socialite, you mean co conspirator, fellow all around scusbag,
Speaker 1: fellow child abuser. That's what you mean, right, not socialite
Speaker 1: was seen sporting a new shorter haircut as she did
Speaker 1: lapse of the facilities exercise yard on the frigid temperatures
Speaker 1: on Sunday, February eighteenth. Well, that's why her hands were
Speaker 1: balled up. Even down in Florida, it gets a bit
Speaker 1: chilly sometimes it comes a mid claim. She is working
Speaker 1: on a book in which she will confront misinformation about
Speaker 1: her ties to billionaire one hundred millionaire Jeffrey Epstein, after
Speaker 1: court documents name the dead pedophiles, associates and new details
Speaker 1: of his grooming empire earlier this year, there weren't new details.
Speaker 1: We had all of those documents pretty much previously. They
Speaker 1: just added a little bit of salt to the meal.
Speaker 1: We just got to see some of the names that
Speaker 1: were redacted. But the actual documents themselves, we've had access
Speaker 1: to them for a very long time. In January, dailymail
Speaker 1: dot Com revealed that Maxwell had been telling fellow inmates
Speaker 1: in prison to ignore the reports and promised she would
Speaker 1: write a memoir giving the truth. Although this is expected
Speaker 1: to be an attempt to whitewash her involvement. Oh you
Speaker 1: don't say. I thought she was gonna give us a real, full,
Speaker 1: unadulterated account of what happened, because you know, Glenn Maxwell
Speaker 1: is the pinnacle of truth, right. She is your old
Speaker 1: Salt and Earth type of person, never told a lie.
Speaker 1: I mean, she's George Washington over here. A source claim
Speaker 1: that Maxwell, who was a close associate of Epstein for years,
Speaker 1: claimed the documents in the News are all false or misinformation,
Speaker 1: and the truth will only come out when her book does. Well.
Speaker 1: We all can't wait for that, because you know, the
Speaker 1: arbiter of truth over here, Miss Maxwell is spoken. The
Speaker 1: insider said, she's bragging about how great it will be,
Speaker 1: but it sounds like the same old lies she has
Speaker 1: told a thousand times. Well, yeah, that's because that's all
Speaker 1: she has is lies. What she gonna say, Oh, the
Speaker 1: picture's fake, that wasn't me on the plane. I didn't
Speaker 1: help abuse all these girls. Everybody's lying, And it's just
Speaker 1: laughable at best to think that she has something now
Speaker 1: that she's willing to give up or willing to put
Speaker 1: in a book that she wouldn't give the Feds previously.
Speaker 1: Who are you protecting and why And now all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, you're gonna set the story straight by putting
Speaker 1: out an autobiography. She really thinks she hasn't done anything
Speaker 1: wrong and that her charges will be dropped when people
Speaker 1: read it. Well, she's going to be in for a very,
Speaker 1: very big surprise because I haven't talked to one single
Speaker 1: person and this is not hyperbole, not one single person
Speaker 1: who's been like, you know what, Golan Maxwell, she got railroaded,
Speaker 1: She got a raw deal, and you know why. That's
Speaker 1: because she didn't. Glan Maxwell is exactly where she belongs.
Speaker 1: And she's being punished for her role in Epstein's criminal enterprise,
Speaker 1: not because she was friends with Epstein, and not because
Speaker 1: Epstein's dead. Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking teenagers and
Speaker 1: multiple counts of conspiracy after a twenty twenty one federal
Speaker 1: trial heard how she lured girls as young as fourteen
Speaker 1: into Epstein's clutches. In a self serving prison interview last year,
Speaker 1: she denied knowledge of the dead financier's crime, insisting she
Speaker 1: regretted ever meeting him and had no idea he was
Speaker 1: capable of evil. Imagine her trying to gaslight you and
Speaker 1: tell you that and expect you to believe it. I
Speaker 1: don't believe her. I'm sure most of you don't believe her,
Speaker 1: and the jury certainly didn't believe her. But hundreds of
Speaker 1: documents made public in January relating to a long settled
Speaker 1: defamation case filed against Maxwell by Prince Andrew's accuser, Virginia Roberts,
Speaker 1: make a mockery of her claims of innocence. Scores of
Speaker 1: famous people, including Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, Donald Trump, and
Speaker 1: Stephen Hawking were outed as being friends or associates of
Speaker 1: the late predator who hanged himself behind bars allegedly in
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen instead of facing trial. But multiple testimonies from
Speaker 1: victims and former Epstein aides once more insisted that Maxwell
Speaker 1: was the boss of his underage sex ring, trying the
Speaker 1: same conclusions as jurors in her New York trial. And
Speaker 1: that's really what it comes down to. Glenn Maxwell can
Speaker 1: yell and scream and complain and act like she's been
Speaker 1: given a raw deal, but that's all a bunch of bs.
Speaker 1: Glenn Maxwell has been given more than a fair shake,
Speaker 1: and she was able to run around free for all
Speaker 1: these years when she should have been in prison, so
Speaker 1: she should just say of all of the nonsense about
Speaker 1: how she's writing a memoir or this or that the
Speaker 1: other thing, and worry about her appeal. Federal inmates are
Speaker 1: prohibited from cutting publishing deals, but there is nothing to
Speaker 1: prevent Maxwell from writing a private manuscript, an activity protected
Speaker 1: by the First Amendment, and mailing it to a lawyer
Speaker 1: or a loved one for a distribution. She doesn't have
Speaker 1: a computer, but has access to a typewriter and can
Speaker 1: bone up on the legal system via her job in
Speaker 1: the law library at the low security Tallahassee Prison, where
Speaker 1: she's been incarcerated since July of twenty twenty two. She
Speaker 1: has access to three lockers and legal and moves her
Speaker 1: manuscript in papers from one to the other because she's
Speaker 1: so paranoid that someone might steal it or leak it.
Speaker 1: The source added, I could see that. I mean, with
Speaker 1: her being so infamous, there's gonna be people that will
Speaker 1: look to benefit. So if she's really writing this manuscript,
Speaker 1: I could see why she'd want to keep it private.
Speaker 1: Apparently it's already finished, but she is waiting for the
Speaker 1: right moment to publish it. Oh yeah, I'm sure the
Speaker 1: right moment. When is the right moment going to be
Speaker 1: for Glenn Maxwell. The source explained how Maxwell has become
Speaker 1: increasingly withdrawn and bitter behind bars and throwing temper tantrums
Speaker 1: and barely participating in prison life. Yeah, she's letting the
Speaker 1: time do her. We've talked about this before. You can't
Speaker 1: let the time do you. You have to do the time.
Speaker 1: And if that means, you know, losing yourself in education
Speaker 1: or being involved in whatever is going on at the
Speaker 1: prison as far as you know programs, that's what you
Speaker 1: have to do. But if you sit around and cry
Speaker 1: and complain and do the whole woe is me? Shit, Well,
Speaker 1: it's gonna seem like double the time that you're doing.
Speaker 1: So you her, just get on with it. Unfortunately, people
Speaker 1: like Glenn Maxwell, they don't understand that. They don't understand
Speaker 1: that there's punishments for people like them. She believes that
Speaker 1: she's innocent. She has no idea why she's locked up.
Speaker 1: Dailymail dot Com previously revealed how Maxwell hosted yoga and
Speaker 1: etiquette classes for eight hundred and forty six fellow cons
Speaker 1: after arriving in the Sunshine State and will go jogging
Speaker 1: every day on the running track. She recently abandoned plans
Speaker 1: to participate in a prison marathon race. However, barely gets
Speaker 1: any exercise and rarely goes outside. Oh boo hoo. Glenn
Speaker 1: Maxwell is in prison. Is it supposed to be fun?
Speaker 1: Should she be out here doing all kinds of marathons
Speaker 1: and living her best life? I don't think she should be.
Speaker 1: I think it's because she's finally realized that she's not
Speaker 1: getting out of here anytime soon. This will all change, however,
Speaker 1: when her book comes out, or so she thinks. Maxwell
Speaker 1: has to serve her time at FCI Danberry, the white
Speaker 1: collar Connecticut lock up that inspired Orange is the New Black,
Speaker 1: but was unexpectedly shipped one thousand miles south of Florida.
Speaker 1: Well that's not really how it went down. She asked
Speaker 1: to go to Danbury, but nobody ever made her a
Speaker 1: promise that she's going there, and the Justice Department decided
Speaker 1: that Tallahassee was the better location. FCI Tallahassee bosses tried
Speaker 1: to keep inmates from learning too much about her by
Speaker 1: removing the library's only copy of Filthy Rich, James Patterson's
Speaker 1: best selling book about Epstein's crimes, but his word got
Speaker 1: around about her ties to the billionaire pedophile. She found
Speaker 1: herself being despised by her fellow felins, who say she
Speaker 1: is aloof and has poor hygiene. Imagine this lady running
Speaker 1: around miss millionaire billionaire poor hygiene. Really. Controversy ensued when
Speaker 1: Maxwell used the prison video visit system to give an
Speaker 1: interview to UK broadcaster Jeremy Kyle in which she claimed
Speaker 1: without evidence that the now notorious photograph of Prince Andrew
Speaker 1: and Junior Roberts was a fake. Still on that one, huh,
Speaker 1: let's see some proof. Her and Victoria Hervey out here
Speaker 1: talking all kinds of nonsense with zero proof. Meanwhile, that
Speaker 1: picture has been validated by the man who saw it originally,
Speaker 1: the photographer. We've done that article before, so we have
Speaker 1: some receipts. Does Maxwell have any receipts? Does lady Victoria
Speaker 1: Heavy have any receipts? The answer is no. So why
Speaker 1: in the hell would anyone believe anything these two skuffoozes
Speaker 1: have to say? Del Email dot com revealed how the
Speaker 1: chat earned Maxwell forty eight hours in the Special Housing Unit,
Speaker 1: a prison within a prison with tiny grim cells where
Speaker 1: inmates are caged for twenty three hours at a time
Speaker 1: and fed through slits in the door. It's also reported
Speaker 1: that the brit earned the title Prison Karen after lodging
Speaker 1: hundreds of petty complaints about life behind bars, from slating
Speaker 1: the paltry vegan menu to moaning about a transgender inmate
Speaker 1: having noisy sex in the bunk above hers. Well, I
Speaker 1: don't blame her for that. I don't care if it's
Speaker 1: a transsexual or whatever. I don't want anybody having a
Speaker 1: bang session above me. Maxwell, Federal prisoner zero two eight
Speaker 1: seven nine DASH five h nine, also landed to Cuban
Speaker 1: felons in solitary confinement after snitching on them for demanding
Speaker 1: that she by them items. With her three hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty dollars commentsary allowance, she will be nearly eighty by
Speaker 1: the time she is freed, unless she can successfully appeal
Speaker 1: her convictions for helping Epstein, who committed suicide allegedly in
Speaker 1: prison while awaiting trial in August of twenty nineteen. He
Speaker 1: was sixty six. Federal prosecutors deny claims she was made
Speaker 1: a scapegoat for his crimes. Well, that's because she wasn't.
Speaker 1: She was right there in the thick of it, and
Speaker 1: not only that, but she was given orders to the underlings.
Speaker 1: So once you do that and you have yourself a
Speaker 1: you know, supervisory role in a criminal enterprise, I don't
Speaker 1: want to hear shit that you had nothing to do
Speaker 1: with it. You were involved with both feet on the
Speaker 1: ground and both eyes wide open. And now, Glene Maxwell,
Speaker 1: it's time to reap what you have sown. All of
Speaker 1: the information that goes with this episode can be found
Speaker 1: in the description box project What's Up everyone, and welcome
Speaker 1: back to the Epstein Chronicles. It seems like every single
Speaker 1: person who has ever been a member of New York
Speaker 1: so called high society has rubbed shoulders with Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter if you're a politician, business mogul, Hollywood star,
Speaker 1: foreign dignitary. It just doesn't matter. If you were running
Speaker 1: around with the upper crust of New York in the
Speaker 1: nineties the two thousands, well you were probably rubbing shoulders
Speaker 1: with Jeffrey Epstein and his scumbag friends. And chances are
Speaker 1: if you were another one of the so called elite,
Speaker 1: you found your way into his bloe book. And you
Speaker 1: better believe. People have questions, and so far most of
Speaker 1: the answers coming from people who have had their name
Speaker 1: found in that Black Book I have found to be lacking.
Speaker 1: You mean to tell me you find yourself in Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 1: Kallainne Maxwell's Black Book and you have no idea how
Speaker 1: you got there. Did they just go through the yellow
Speaker 1: pages and decide to put your name in their book
Speaker 1: just for effect? Or was there a reason you were
Speaker 1: in that book? Were you friendly with them? Did you
Speaker 1: do business with them? Were you partaking in Epstein's disgusting
Speaker 1: criminal enterprise? What is it? And a lot of these
Speaker 1: people who were in this Black Book so far haven't
Speaker 1: been made to answer for it now. Of course, just
Speaker 1: because you're in that book doesn't automatically mean that you're
Speaker 1: out here molested in people. And that's certainly not what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. Other people might be, but not me. What
Speaker 1: I'm saying is you better have a damn good answer
Speaker 1: for why you're in that book, right And these people
Speaker 1: that just avoid it or give you the whole I
Speaker 1: have no idea while I was in that book. Those
Speaker 1: are the people that, inevitably it comes back, we end
Speaker 1: up finding out that they were a lot closer to
Speaker 1: Epstein and Maxwell than they ever let on and we
Speaker 1: see it everywhere, whether it be foreign dignitaries, American ex politicians, businessmen.
Speaker 1: This guy was hanging out with the so called elite
Speaker 1: at every single level, and that especially went for the
Speaker 1: socialite class. Right. How many different people from the socialite
Speaker 1: class were running around and partying over at Jeffrey Epstein's
Speaker 1: a whole lot of them. We have heard about people
Speaker 1: from all walks of life that were regulars at Epstein's
Speaker 1: townhouse or down in Florida. And today, in this episode,
Speaker 1: another person just got called out for being in that
Speaker 1: black book. And this person is sowing on TV and
Speaker 1: it's a TV show called The Real Housewives of Dubai.
Speaker 1: Now I do not watch this version of the show.
Speaker 1: The only one of these shows I watch any more
Speaker 1: of these days, as far as these housewives shows. And
Speaker 1: I can't even lie to you, folks. I watched the
Speaker 1: Jersey one just because I just can't stop watching the
Speaker 1: stupid drama of that show, so I watch it with
Speaker 1: my girlfriend. But I don't watch any of these other ones.
Speaker 1: You know about Beverly Hills or OC or any of
Speaker 1: this other nonsense that they have out there. I find
Speaker 1: it all repetitive when those shows first started, I thought
Speaker 1: they were pretty funny to watch, pretty interesting to watch
Speaker 1: the train wreck, But now it's just a bunch of garbage, right.
Speaker 1: But the fact is, these socialites and these people that
Speaker 1: are in these shows, these are the very same people
Speaker 1: that were traversing the hallways of Jeffrey Epstein's downhouse. And
Speaker 1: none of these people have been called out on the carpet.
Speaker 1: None of these people have really been asked, Hey, what's
Speaker 1: going on here? How is it that you were at
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's house so many times, found yourself in the
Speaker 1: Black Book, and yet you have no idea what's going on?
Speaker 1: You never saw anything that you thoughts questionable, even now
Speaker 1: with hindsight as your guide. And I find that very
Speaker 1: very hard to believe. Now, of course, you can't prove
Speaker 1: any of that, right, You can't prove that somebody saw
Speaker 1: this or saw that, And it's a lot of assumption.
Speaker 1: But for me, it's just a bridge too far to
Speaker 1: try and get me to believe that all of these
Speaker 1: people that were around him had no idea. All these
Speaker 1: young girls always not like he had a bunch of
Speaker 1: nieces and nephews, right, not like he had his own kids.
Speaker 1: So what are all of these young girls doing around
Speaker 1: you all the time? And on this Real Housewives of
Speaker 1: Dubai show, this woman, Caroline Stanbury got called out for
Speaker 1: being in the Black Book. So today we have a
Speaker 1: relatively short article from page six over at the New
Speaker 1: York Post headline Caroline Stanbury called out for allegedly being
Speaker 1: in Jeffrey Epstein's Notebook. This article was authored by Evan Reel.
Speaker 1: A big claim about Jeffrey Epstein's Little Black Book comes
Speaker 1: up during the Real Housewives of Dubai Season one reunion,
Speaker 1: And look, I know it sounds kind of silly, right,
Speaker 1: what do these people know about Jeffrey Epstein. On the outside,
Speaker 1: it looks ridiculous. Ah, someone's just saying that to try
Speaker 1: and you know, demean their friend. But let's remember the
Speaker 1: halls of power that all of these women were traveling in.
Speaker 1: All of their husbands are loaded, and we all know
Speaker 1: that the kings and queens all play games together while
Speaker 1: the rest of us, well, while we toil. So they're
Speaker 1: all rubbing shoulders, they all know each other. And the
Speaker 1: fact that she's in the book, well, look, that's a
Speaker 1: legitimate question. If you find your name in this book
Speaker 1: and anyone ever asks you what the hell your name's
Speaker 1: doing in that book, you shouldn't get offended, because, guess what,
Speaker 1: your name is the one in that book nobody else's,
Speaker 1: So people are gonna have legitimate questions. And most of
Speaker 1: the people who are in this book are people of means.
Speaker 1: It's not John John the dog walker from down the block.
Speaker 1: It's not Little Rudy the cab driver or Sally the
Speaker 1: doggy walker. These are legitimate business moguls, high flying hotshots
Speaker 1: with big old bank accounts that you and I could
Speaker 1: never even dream about ever seeing. And yet at the
Speaker 1: same time hanging out with one of the most disgusting
Speaker 1: human traffickers in the history of the world and yucking
Speaker 1: it up while they do it. Lessa Milan accuses co
Speaker 1: star Caroline Stanbury of being among the names listed in
Speaker 1: Epstein's in the Misaddress Book and now again, look, just
Speaker 1: because you're in the book does not mean you took
Speaker 1: part in the abuse. But there has to be a
Speaker 1: reason why Epstein and Maxwell thought it would be a
Speaker 1: good idea to have your name in that book. What
Speaker 1: was that reason? I think that's what people want to know.
Speaker 1: And these people who were in the book who avoid answering, Well,
Speaker 1: they're just making it worse on themselves. If you have
Speaker 1: a legitimate reason while you're why you were in that book,
Speaker 1: then you should give that reason when you're asked. If not,
Speaker 1: people are going to continue to ask you. That's how
Speaker 1: this works. It contained contact information of more than one
Speaker 1: thousand celebrities, politicians, and titans of business, including Bill Clinton,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, and Alec bald Went, among others. And we
Speaker 1: all know that all of these people that were running
Speaker 1: around with Jeffrey Epstein, they're all up to the same
Speaker 1: nonsense as far as how they feel about the rest
Speaker 1: of the society, right, they look down their nose at
Speaker 1: the rest of us. We're all replaceable, We're just chattel.
Speaker 1: And that was why Jeffrey Epstein and his associates, well,
Speaker 1: one of the reasons that they went after girls from
Speaker 1: broken homes, that they went after girls who were coming
Speaker 1: from trauma, who had been abused already, because they knew
Speaker 1: that that was the easiest path and that nobody would
Speaker 1: believe those girls if they ever came forward against these
Speaker 1: high profile hotshots. Focus on being in Jeffrey Epstein's notebook,
Speaker 1: Milan thirty three tells Stanbury forty six. In a preview
Speaker 1: are you and Jeffrey Epstein's book? Host Andy Cohen asked Stanbury,
Speaker 1: to which she just seemingly shrugs. Probably not the right
Speaker 1: way to go about it, miss Stanbury. Why are you
Speaker 1: in the book for what reason? And how do you
Speaker 1: know Jeffrey Epstein? Pretty simple? And if you're honest about
Speaker 1: it and you give some answers, I'm sure people will
Speaker 1: move on. I know me personally, I only have one
Speaker 1: desire here, and that desire is justice. That's right, I know,
Speaker 1: a word that escapes most of us, but not this time.
Speaker 1: Enough is enough with these people. How long are we
Speaker 1: going to let them run around and do whatever they
Speaker 1: want while the rest of us just continue to get
Speaker 1: shit on of London. Alum famously dated Prince Andrew following
Speaker 1: his two thousand divorce from Sarah Ferguson. So of course
Speaker 1: she was around Jeffrey Epstein, and of course she's, you know,
Speaker 1: part of the old crew that they were running with.
Speaker 1: All of these socialites that were running with Epstein, how
Speaker 1: many of them have come forward And that's why I
Speaker 1: just have zero good to say about socialites in general.
Speaker 1: If I'm being honest what does that even mean? So
Speaker 1: you go to parties for a living, you go around
Speaker 1: and you griff for a living. Here's an idea, get
Speaker 1: a job. Nobody cares that you're a socialite. What is this?
Speaker 1: The Gilded Age, the British Royals say was a noted
Speaker 1: acquaintance of the late pedophile Epstein, who committed suicide allegedly
Speaker 1: in jail in August of twenty nineteen before his sex
Speaker 1: trafficking trial was scheduled to begin. In the aftermath, Prince
Speaker 1: Andrew was accused of forcing Virginia Roberts, one of Epstein's
Speaker 1: many survivors, to have disgusting sex with them three times,
Speaker 1: starting in two thousand and one when she was just seventeen.
Speaker 1: Prince Andrew has denied the claims. And it's funny that
Speaker 1: Stanbury was with Andrew at the time, right, So these
Speaker 1: are legitimate questions. Now, I'm not sitting here saying that
Speaker 1: miss Stanbury had anything to do with it or anything
Speaker 1: like that. But you don't know what you saw. Maybe
Speaker 1: maybe you should come forward and a short shrug of
Speaker 1: the shoulders when being called out about it is not
Speaker 1: the right way to go Elsewhere in the Real Housewives
Speaker 1: of Dubai reunion clip, Milan calls Stanbury the wicked Witch
Speaker 1: of the Middle East. Stanbury then accuses Milan of being
Speaker 1: a former escort. Later, Stanbury alleges that her cast mates
Speaker 1: made a pack to get her fired from the New
Speaker 1: Housewives series prior to production. Well, if you're running around
Speaker 1: with Jeffrey Epstein, you should have never been on this
Speaker 1: show in the first place, lady. So even though I
Speaker 1: haven't watched one minute of this show, I'm with the
Speaker 1: other women. Anyone who was running around with Epstein is
Speaker 1: my adversary. That's not true. Chanelle Aon asserts, yes, it was,
Speaker 1: because I was part of it. Caroline Brooks fires back.
Speaker 1: The trailer concludes with Stanbury presenting a collection of documents
Speaker 1: she titled Lisa Milan's Book of Lies. The binder's cover
Speaker 1: image features Milan with a Pinocchio style nose photoshopped on
Speaker 1: her face. Imagine having so little problem in the world
Speaker 1: that this is what you do. You sit around with
Speaker 1: your friends all day, you drink wine, talk shit, hang
Speaker 1: out in Dubai, and then get on the internet and
Speaker 1: throw accusations at each other. Meanwhile, people can't put food
Speaker 1: on the table. People can't afford their electricity bill. And
Speaker 1: I was just reading an article that like one in
Speaker 1: six Americans are going to struggle paying for their electricity
Speaker 1: bills this winter. But go ahead and have another argument
Speaker 1: about this nonsense reason four hundred and seventy three hundred
Speaker 1: and thirty six. I can't watch this garbage on TV anymore.
Speaker 1: You're obsessed with me, and I rate Milantel Stanbury. You
Speaker 1: wish you look like this. Part one of the Real
Speaker 1: Housewives of Dubai season airs Wednesday, August thirty first at
Speaker 1: nine pm on Bravo. Well, the point of this article
Speaker 1: once again is just to show you how deep the
Speaker 1: ties of Epstein went. Whether it be the socialite community,
Speaker 1: whether it be politicians, you name it. Everybody had a
Speaker 1: purpose as well. If you were brought into Jeffrey Epstein's atmosphere,
Speaker 1: into his orbit, there was a reason why. It wasn't
Speaker 1: because he's a nice guy or he wants to do
Speaker 1: something for you. Now the question is what was Stanbury
Speaker 1: brought into the orbit to do? And I guess that's
Speaker 1: a question only she can answer. All right, folks, that
Speaker 1: most certainly is going to do it for this episode. Now,
Speaker 1: I've had some of you reach out to me about
Speaker 1: how you could help out with the show, donat and
Speaker 1: stuff like that. And while I don't really have any
Speaker 1: sort of, you know, anything set up for that purpose,
Speaker 1: I do have a PayPal account and I'll put the
Speaker 1: PayPal account link in the description box. So those of
Speaker 1: you out there who have contacted me, if you want
Speaker 1: to donate some dollars to the show, a couple bucks, cool,
Speaker 1: totally not necessary. You don't have to do it, and
Speaker 1: it's not something that I promote here on the podcast.
Speaker 1: I'm fortunate enough that my advertiser dollars are enough to
Speaker 1: keep the show running right and make it worthwhile. So
Speaker 1: I know how rough it is on folks with finances
Speaker 1: these days, so I'm trying to go a different route
Speaker 1: with it. I know everybody has their stuff set up
Speaker 1: for crowdfunding, and that's awesome. That's really cool, and I
Speaker 1: think that's a really great way to go about it.
Speaker 1: But I just know that people are stretched right, so
Speaker 1: I don't make it a priority. But for those of
Speaker 1: you who reached out, the link will be in the
Speaker 1: description box. If you want to contact me, you can
Speaker 1: do that at Bobby Kapuchi at ProtonMail dot com. That's
Speaker 1: b O b b y c A p u c
Speaker 1: c I at ProtonMail dot com. You can also find
Speaker 1: me on Twitter at b O b b y underscore
Speaker 1: c A p u c c I. The link that
Speaker 1: I discussed can be found in the description box.