Speaker 1: Welcome back to Oudam this world. I'm Jamie Hanshaw and
Courtney's back, Courtney Turner, our resident UN commentator, expert historian. Whoever,
whenever I want to talk about the weirdness of the UN,
I always call Courtney because she has been covering and
also she did a show a couple of weeks ago
about the twenty twenty fourth Summit of the Future where
they were making a couple of predictions, and uh, now
that has happened and she is here to share with
us what all went down at the UN. How are you, Courtney.
Speaker 2: I'm doing well, thank you. Yeah, how are you?
Speaker 1: I'm pretty good. While we were all distracted by the Diddler,
the UN went and cast a bunch of Global Digital
Compact or the Future or the Shared Digital Future right.
Speaker 3: And there for the future and their Declaration for the
Future Generations, which was like all about education, yes, really indoctrination.
But yeah, so.
Speaker 1: You said in your previous show that this was a
stepping stone towards building the AI world society. Now I
talk about AI from the perspective of like replacing women
with sex spots and you know, robo companions, AI fleshlights,
stuff like that. But that's because this is a weird show.
But I always like to have on extral relevant though. Yeah, so,
like it's not just crazy tinfoil hat stuff. It's actually
coming to you know, your next door neighbor is going
to have a robo wife probably within ten years. So
back on Earth, though, can you tell us more about
what the Global Digital Compact is and why do you
think that this is, you know, building opening the door
for AI.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so, okay.
Speaker 3: The Global Digital Compact is this agreement where they're trying
to create basically complete control of the Internet, and it's
all under the guys of things that are very lovely
sounding like we don't want misinformation, we don't want heat speech,
we want inclusivity. And when they talk about inclusivity, they
talk about we don't want anybody left behind, and this
kind of reminds you of like the no child left behind,
no no one left behind is just code for communism.
It means they're gonna, you know, reduce it to the
lowest denominator. But when they talk about how they need
to increase the inclusivity, it's very similar to what they
were doing with the WHO pandemic treaty that they remain
to agreements because they didn't want.
Speaker 2: To have to actually ratify them.
Speaker 3: So they were talking about how one of their main
justifications for doing that treaty was that they thought it
was very unfair that all of these underdeveloped countries didn't
get the vaccine or you know, the jabs. Yeah, so
they thought it was very unfair. And so even though
all the statistics show that these people were, you know,
suffering from less diverse reactions and they were actually faring better,
they felt it was very unfair and they wanted to
make sure that in the future they could ensure that
whatever experimental uh, you know, pharmaceuticals they come up with,
that they can be sure that everybody has access to them,
because it is kind of what.
Speaker 2: They're talking about with the Internet.
Speaker 3: They're saying, it's very unfair that there are people in
the world who don't have access to the Internet, and
they don't have access to the pocket.
Speaker 2: Computers otherwise known as cell phone.
Speaker 3: And part of the reason they're very concerned about this
is because they want to have a well being economy
where everybody has access to the digital economy that they're
trying to put forth.
Speaker 2: Otherwise and picture now, yeah, yeah, so they have to
lay all the groundwork right. So they incremental.
Speaker 1: One world currency, yes, linked to the digital market.
Speaker 2: And they also talk about the what else was in there?
Speaker 3: I don't know if I have this in front of me,
I wish it did, but uh, they actually lay out
I might be able to find the picture and read it,
but they actually lay out, like, uh, the seventeen Sustainable
Goals and what they mean in the Global Digital Compact,
because they're not exactly the same in the Global Digital Compact.
They have like different meanings and it's all referencing, like
you know, the digital realm. But the reason I think
this is paving the way for AI is because they
keep saying they're behind on their seventeen Sustainable Development Goals
and they therefore they won't be able to REA Agenda
twenty thirty, and they need to reach Agenda twenty thirty
before they can get to They don't call it Agenda
twenty forty five, but of course Agenda twenty forty.
Speaker 2: Five is the AI World Society.
Speaker 3: It's the centennial of the UN, so that's in twenty
forty five. This is also when Ray kurzwell, you know,
he wrote book The Singularity is nearer, and what does
he predict that the singularity is going to be. He
says in twenty forty five, it just to coincide with
the AI world society. And the AI world society is
like it's literally the metaverse on steroids. So they predict
like everybody will now be inside this virtual world where
everything is interconnected. They talk about Ukraine being the central locust.
It's the central hub for this AI world society that's
going connected to all these other grizz these nodes around
the world, and it's a they do do these symposiums
or they talk about how we have to rebuild Ukraine.
It sounds a little bit like tear down so we
can build it back about it, Yeah, And they say
that they're decimated by the war, so we have to
send them lots of support and you know, finance, and
we have to rebuild it. And then they talk about
how it is going to be the central hub where
we connected to all the fifteen minute city see forty
cities smart cities around the world. And then they talk
about things like we'll have a digital twin. All human
governments will be supplanted by AI governments. So AI is
going to replace all governments. Of course, we aren't going
to have nation states anymore, so those governments aren't really
all that relevant anyway. But AI will also dictate corporate policy,
which many of these corporations are supernational entities. So yeah,
I know they told the one other thing I'll just
say before gone because this is so creepy.
Speaker 2: But they six G and how six G will be
the interfaced.
Speaker 3: Of course, they you know, uses humans in order to
harness the power, and that they've released the studies on that,
like University of Amherst, Massachusetts. But they also talk about
how sixty is going to be what is used to
connect the Internet of Things and Internet of bodies to
the Internet of NanoBio things, so they'll have biometric.
Speaker 2: Sensors all throughout us. And yes, this will be connected
to everything.
Speaker 3: But it's all under the guise that they're going to
help us, and you know it'll they'll know if we
have not taken our medicine today and they'll be able
to help us so that we can take more.
Speaker 1: And all this coming from you know, the affiliated NGEO
Lucius Trust former Lucifer publishing companies talking about channeling lights
and beings and ascended masters and as wooo as you
could possibly get if these are the delegates that are
the world leader, that are supposed to be hashing out
all of our complex problems, and the problem now is
just humanity, right, So we can't govern ourselves, we can't
be trusted to keep peace. Everything's popping off. This is
a weird job because you even ten years ago, we
would wait weeks and weeks for something to happen, some
awards show or some celebrity scandal, or like someone post
a baphame or just something like we were. We had
our like decoding goggles on, waiting for Mays to get
like some kind of esoteric thing. But now it's just
boom boom boom every day, and so in your face,
it's so crazy. And you were talking about this with
your show. I forgot the lady's name, that doctor that
does dangerous names, can you definitely merit? Yes, very smart,
lady Merit. So I watched your ol show and talk
about America's sovereignty because they're gonna say we're too warlike, okay,
so it's either going to be aliens save us from
nuclear war, right, or the AI we have to surrender
all of our rights. So first America has to surrender
the sovereignty to the UN. Did that happen?
Speaker 2: This is so essentially it did.
Speaker 3: So what they they call it global complex global shocks.
And they were saying, how U terrorists would say that,
you know, we have the global He would use it
synonymously with pandemics like complex global shock or global pandemic.
Speaker 2: But the idea is that you know, anything that.
Speaker 3: Could be a super stressful moment, for it doesn't even
have to be globally. They said, it could be anywhere,
and of course it's a kind of our charity because
they could just decide we're incurring this global you know shock,
And they said, any kind of global shock that now
the UN has.
Speaker 2: They call the UN two point zero. That's what this
Pact for the Future was all about, was.
Speaker 3: UN two point zero, which now strengthens the power of
the UN. And they don't say global government. They use
the term global governance because somehow it's supposed to be
more palatable to those of us who do not want
a global government. But they say that in those cases
the UN now has the power, and they say they're finite,
But we saw how finite the powers were you know,
in twenty twenty, so you know, we see the lasting
effects of that. But they say it's finite and then
they could, you know, exercise whatever measures they feel they
feel fit because these are you know, emergency powers essentially.
So essentially, they're basically saying that they could institute like
global martial law if they wanted to do.
Speaker 1: Right. So I was just going to ask you if
this is like martial law but for everyone, for everyone
in it.
Speaker 3: They don't use the term martial law, but they say
they have infinite they have finite infinite powers essentially.
Speaker 1: And these global shocks are very much like trauma based
mind control, like on a mass scale. Yes, And just
this week we had what the hurricane destroying North Carolina.
Speaker 3: And you know what nobody's talking about with the hurricanes.
So the area where the hurricane hit is like a
lithium gold mine. What is the lithium power? The powers,
the electric vehicles, their power, the uh, you know, all
of the cards, it's our phones, everything, all the chips, right,
and what are they going to need? But it's basically
like the semmiiconductors are all powered by lithium.
Speaker 1: So what are they.
Speaker 3: Going to need for the AI World Society. I think
it's very interesting that with the area in.
Speaker 2: Hawaii also right, that that was also.
Speaker 1: Very rich and right with the buyers yep. And so
now there's only like one way in and one way
out of that really crucial mind.
Speaker 2: Is that true of the in Hawaii or now in
North Carolina? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah. And FEMA is not helping.
Speaker 3: No, and they're the government in general is not helping.
But they're saying that we have to send like sixteen
billion dollars to Ukraine and you know, to fund all
these wars. But they're not helping because we can't help
the people here.
Speaker 1: And this is such a disaster. I mean, people are
still missing. Six hundred people they said have been killed
by the flood and one hundred more people missing. People
are without food and power for days and days and days.
No one's helping them, and water, no water. People have
reported that their tires are getting slashed.
Speaker 2: I hear the crime has gone like through the roof. Yeah.
Speaker 1: They locked everyone out of all of the major places
where you could get resources like Walmart, Target, like the
big stores that have lots of food and water. The
police are guarding that and not allowing anybody to have
any you know, necessities. Yeah. So it's just so crazy,
Like I wonder when people will just put down the
pen and stop paying into this system that hates you
and sends all your money away and is ruining the
country and we have to pay for it.
Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, that would be good.
Speaker 1: So if you want to do anything, just like stop
writing them checks.
Speaker 2: Yes, I'm all for that. Yeah, yes, So we pray
for the.
Speaker 1: People in ash especially and in North Carolina and in
East Tennessee. This was a crazy I mean, we haven't
done any shows on weather modification, but I definitely think
that's a thing.
Speaker 3: I thought it immediately. I was like, nothing about this
seems natural. No, nothing about this seems natural.
Speaker 1: And what's so crazy is like you would never think
a hurricane would hurt you in.
Speaker 2: Appalachia, right, That's something, right, That's the last.
Speaker 1: Thing you would ever, you know, be scared of. So
people just went to bed that night not thinking that
they're going to be flooded and then yeah, you get
swept away. So okay, So this is one of the
future shocks that we're talking about, man made disasters or
manipulated things that would have not been so bad, but
then they can amp them up right, right, Yes, so,
and then again the whole Hollywood pee ditty scandal. Here's
another shock their idols are falling. Can you think of
any other weekly shocks just this week? Oh, the the
We're gonna talk about that in the second. But the
whole Archangel Michael stuff.
Speaker 3: Oh yes, I don't know if that would be a shock,
but it's a definitely set up.
Speaker 2: Quite a ruckus.
Speaker 1: It's not a shock, it's more of a splinter.
Speaker 3: Yes, hate splinters, and that's what it's designed to do.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's definitely designed too.
Speaker 3: Although I would say, didn't we have another assassination at
them Trump pretty recently?
Speaker 2: Golf? Yeah, yeah, that's kind of a shock. Right.
Speaker 1: So this is a funny job to have because you're like,
do I report on Diddy? Do I report on UN?
Do I report on like what's going on in uh
the hurricane and weather modification? But so we're focused on
the UN right now because we've done all these shows.
Speaker 4: But well, it's really funny that you say that because
I go through this, like every week I do this
radio show, and I'm always like I don't know to say,
I don't know what to say, and my fiance always
laughs at me because he's like, there's a million things
to say, and I'm like.
Speaker 3: I know, but I'm like squirrel, squirrel, squirrel, Like yeah, talk.
Speaker 2: About and then I always prepare show. I did this
for my speech at Freedomfested.
Speaker 3: I was actually we drove to East Tennesseees right outside
of Knoxville.
Speaker 2: We drove back and.
Speaker 3: You know, it was like with all the weather, it
was pretty intense, but they that we were okay, and
actually for my speeches stopped raining but to those fifteen minutes.
But I had twenty, like thirty pages of notes for
fifteen minutes speech.
Speaker 2: There's just no way. There's too much to cover. So yeah,
I'm always feeling mess.
Speaker 1: Yes, there's way too much to cover now. And now
you can't even trust.
Speaker 2: The sources, No you can't.
Speaker 1: So let's wrap up you in and then we'll talk
about ya. Well, gossip a little bit. People will never
hear this show, but they're talking about transforming the global government, right. Yeah,
And this is Ai. This is the singularity that you mentioned.
This is the so in masonry. I was reading and
I came across this nugget that I had about ten
years ago, and I forgot about and I came across
it again in my notes and I was like, oh,
this makes so much sense. But basically Freemasonry, one of
their main symbols is the beehive, because they are a
hive mind. Yeah, and the purpose of these rituals is
to make men into more I have a high mind
of people, you know that work as one thing. So
we're seeing all of these secret societies, all of these
mystery schools. You know, the modern Freemasonry is working, and
the great work is towards the borg. Yes, right, Star Trek.
Speaker 3: Yeah, No, this is it's bringing Tayor Deve Shardine's vision
of the nosephere to fruition.
Speaker 2: I mean, and I think.
Speaker 3: That's literally what the AI World Society is. So there's
there's a group, it's essentially a cult. It's called the
Evolutionary Leaders. And Bruce Lifton is one of these. He's
a biologist, but he's an evolutionary leader and he talks
about I probably do have it in here a picture
and it looks exactly like the Hegelian dialectical spiral. They
love their spirals. I we talked about the cosmoerotic humanism
and barbaraa her spiral, so this is his spiral, and
it's he talks about how we start off as bacterium, right,
and then we evolve to the amiba, and he says
the amiba are so intelligent because they have more membrane,
and now the membrane is where they collect their information,
which makes them intelligent. And then of course we've got
humans and they're they're super intelligent because they're this complex
like multicellular organism. So we have all this surface area
of membrane. But he says, now we're kind of at
this crossroads where we can evolve die, and so if
we choose to co create, then we can co create
this andy all to create this organism of humanity.
Speaker 2: And the reason I bring it up is.
Speaker 3: Because what does he say the membrane of the super
organism of humanity will be It's the Internet. So the
Internet is going to be that membrane that will give
us the intelligence. And so of course this is the
no sphere, right, it's the shared hyborg mind.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Do this has something to do with neuralink, don't you think?
Speaker 2: I do think so.
Speaker 3: I do think neuralink, but I think that it's not
just neuralink, so I think, you know, they're a big
fan of a lot of their I do think they're
dialectical kind of options. So you have the and they're
also decoys because the neuralink. The reality is you have
to opt into the neuralink, right, like how many people
are really choosing? There are way more people than I
would like to see who have already opted. I think
is over one hundred thousand. And it's not just the neuralink,
like the Blackrock has THEIRS. I forgot what it's called,
but it's some sort of it's very similar. It's the
same thing. And actually a lot more people have done
the Blackrock one Elon's neuralink. But they have the technology
that really without even you know, without even chipping, that
can put us into this like cybernetic feedback loop and
a sixty. I mean, they can do it pretty easily.
Speaker 1: Do you think the stabbies have anything to do with that?
Speaker 3: So I do, I wrote A I can't say what's
going on with them, the ones that were you know,
the iteration of twenty twenty one in the West, I
don't know.
Speaker 2: I can't.
Speaker 3: I know they're showing all those interesting videos and pictures
but I really.
Speaker 2: Don't know what those are.
Speaker 3: I mean, there's just not enough evidence for me to
have like a definitive kind of commentary on that. But
what I will say is I wrote an article on
twenty twenty one about shedding and potential that and I
wrote it as a speculative piece.
Speaker 2: It had thirty nine sources in it.
Speaker 3: So when I say speculative, you know, I didn't pull
it out of my butt. But but I said, you know,
this is just piecing together data points and I can't say,
you know with certitude that this is what's actually occurring. However,
in that article, I cited a study that was done
in Australia on self disseminating back injections. You know, And
now they're publicly, very transparently, saying they're doing a rollout
on another island that is using self dissemination technology and
this is in Japan. They're about to roll it out.
And this is that you know, this is very public
and very obert. This is not a experiment, a covert
research project. This is where they're saying, this is you
will have no options, but you know, you either take
it or you will be affected.
Speaker 1: Have you seen those like videos of people from like
the Department of Defense and stuff talking about how they
can remove your beliefs in God by I have yep injections.
Speaker 2: And this was Gates, right, Bill Gates.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and this was a while ago too, a long
time ago.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And I think that there's I think there's a
reason to give credence to it. I know a lot
of people will like kind of brush it off as
but what they really want with this high it's part
of why they have to create a one moral religion, right,
and this one moral religion is this theosophical soup where
they accept everything except for Christianity and traditional Judaism. And
of course Blovotski herself, who was the one of the
founders of Theosophical Society in eighteen seventy five, she says
that we welcome, you know, mystical Judaism like Cabbalism, but
we are very opposed to traditional Judaism, and of course
diametrically opposed to Christianity.
Speaker 2: And there's a very good reason for that.
Speaker 3: They want this kind of a blending of these other
religions so that they can put people into you know,
ahyborg mind.
Speaker 1: Well, now you've got the Pope talking about all religions
lead to the same place. So that's one step in
that direction. And then you have some weird stuff going
on in America before the selection. Lots of Oh man,
I don't even know how to talk about this stuff,
Like I know people, just like I know some of
the people, and it's like this is so weird. Okay.
So first they have to give you a different definition
of what God is, yes, or they can take it
away altogether. Right, because if God is everything, then God.
Speaker 2: Is nothing, yes, rightly makes sense.
Speaker 1: So their urge to formulate this plan. And here's this
mural that they put on their website about the Esoteric
Workers and their visualization, their group high Mind group visualization. Right, yes,
So there's the mural. Some kids I don't know, yeah.
Speaker 2: Oh wow wow.
Speaker 1: And they say Esoteric Workers recognize that the mounting crisis
in the world reflect a deeper spiritual crisis as the
forces of separativeness, separateness. How do you even say that separatenessness,
separateness manifesting in national and corporate self centeredness, and materialism
continue to be major driving force in human affairs. The
situation is acute as divine potenties of light and love
and power pour into human consciousness, fueling an ever deepening
sense of synthesis. So this is what they're doing. It's
always one world, right, one one one everything.
Speaker 2: Well, they're now talking about synergistic democracy.
Speaker 3: That's a new term that they're a methodology that they're.
Speaker 2: Trying to impose.
Speaker 1: So this is uh, look Red, what happened in my camera?
I don't know, I heard yeah, okay. Anyways, so they
say this environment reflects an important moment in humanity's ongoing
response to divinely inspired urge to formulate a plan with
a capital plan.
Speaker 2: Of love and light. Yeah, plan of love and light workout.
Speaker 1: So they said, the Cycle of Conferences visualization initiative is
designed to support the will to build a spirit of
synthesis into the world and see major global conferences. Blah
blah blah. And then I was reading down this actual
prayer that they have of this visualization. Now, the last
two shows we did, we talked all about theosophy, right,
and the light workers of the Hidden Masters right.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, the good will servers.
Speaker 1: Yes, the esoteric hidden masters who are forging a new
international consensus.
Speaker 2: Yes, let's see.
Speaker 1: The spiritual effort for the first time in history is
to bring all of them, as functioning groups, under the
direct impact of the energy which motivates and actuates that
place where the will of God is known and the
purposes of a divinity are defined and projected. This means
that each of the coming world conferences will have a
greater and far more extensive effect than would otherwise be
the case. This is from the externalization of the high.
Speaker 2: I knew it like as you're reading it, I'm like,
this is Alice Bailey.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So their goals are to link up with the
souls of all fellow servers who are meditating on the
summit of the future, and to visualize a tide of
lightened energy pouring down from the center where the will
of God is known, and pouring into the center humanity.
Imagine the whole group sounding the affirmation of the will
capital w together and then they they say, are they
chant in the center of the will of God. I
stand not shall deflect my will from his. I implement
that will by love. I turned towards the field of service.
I the triangle divine, work out that will within the
square and serve my fellow men. Is this giving you
any red flags? Because you actually mentioned something super deep.
You said, this is a Pythagorean cult. Yeah, and if
you are trying to make a Pythagorean cult, you would
probably say all is one because their god is the monad, right.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: So the reason I say is the Pythagorean cult is
because the spiral of Theodorus is so that spiral starts
to overlap. So you know, we showed the Hegelian dialectical spiral.
I think of it as a gnostic Jaco latter. I
know that may seem cooky to people, but really that's
what it is, because of Heman is how you go
up the wrongs of the ladder. So they're teaching you
that's the theorgy, right, so that you can become god
and then you can co create. And the theodore of spiral,
the dialectical overlapping of that spiral is at seventeen. And
so what are their seventeen sustainable development goals? There's a
reason there's seventeen of them. And yeah, so I had
made the joke that you know they were the because
Michael O'Fallon had posted something about like angles. I know,
somebody just did a typo and there he was like, well,
actually worshiping angles.
Speaker 2: Is a little bit more by thagory.
Speaker 3: And then you know they were talking about angel, right,
it's typed it And I said, well, don't don't undermine
that the thagory and cold though, because the Theodore spiral
is running the un and it literally is yeah, and.
Speaker 1: So what do you make of the trial divine?
Speaker 3: So I think, well, they they talk about and this
ties right into Archangel Michael, right, So Bailey Blovoski, a
lot of these Theosophus they talk about the archangel Michael
really represents Satan or Hermes Hermes magistus, right, So he
was a you know, Greek god that they worshipped, and
he was the god.
Speaker 2: Of uh trickstery. He was the kind of magician, if
you will, the sorcerer.
Speaker 3: And so I think when they're referring to they also
talk about the triangles as being the godhead. So it's
you know, gives them the divine power. And of course
we see this in pyramids symbols. So I think that
they're when they talk about God, they're talking about Satan.
And I mean, I know again that sounds like, you know,
you're projecting onto them. But Lavatsky herself has said it
so many times. I don't have all the quotes right
in front of me, but I mean, like you, if
you read Lavatsky, she says that because of course this
is a gnostic worldview. They believe that God was this
uh you know, evil God that has limited man's knowledge.
And really it's the Lucifer light bearer who is going
to give them the nosis. And that's the way that
they can become gods, and they can become one. So
when you talk about the monad, that theosopus believe that
we came from source, and so that's you know, the
nature represents the source, and the whole purpose of human
experience is to return to source. But if you look
back in ancient Greek, they would talk about the undifferentiated
all and this is why they have to uh eroude
all boundaries.
Speaker 2: This is why they create the theosophical suit where all
religions are the saying they all all roads lead to one.
Speaker 1: The Pope just.
Speaker 3: Said, yeah, that's right, referencing Polka said.
Speaker 1: And now we have the Donald Trump posting the prayer
to Archangel Michael, which is a Catholic prayer. I mean,
we do in our church. We believe in archangel Michael
Sure Sing and not the devil. We don't pray to
angels and saints. We asked them to pray for us,
right right, right, So it's getting over lappy, it's getting
weird and like so weird, trying to pull apart. And
this is how we knew it was going to be
in the end times, right, Like the Antichrist is going
to be deceptive. He's going to be somebody that everybody
loves and worships and is on their side and his
team humanity or whatever. Like the Antichrist is going to
say stuff like that. So it's just really interesting to
watch people fall for things over and over and over
and multiple things and never develop any kind of critical
thinking or suspicion. Is just like one thing after another
that they fall for.
Speaker 3: Yes, So the art change on Michael Off, I would
call it an off.
Speaker 2: I don't know if that's too bold to say, but
I would call it an off. That's what it looks like.
Speaker 3: And I think it's been brewing for a really really
long time, and I think they've been trying to rope
Trump into this op. So there's many like facets of
this off at least from my view, and it kind
of came into very clear vision for me when I
was at Constance Comby's house and she, I know, this
is just like a.
Speaker 2: Feeling, so I can't go too much on it.
Speaker 3: But sometimes feelings are really strong and you can't really
ignore them, you know, like you get a really strong
intuition about something. And I was in her basement and
She's laying out this whole plan well of how Trump
is the Antichrist, and I just felt like a black
wild swallowed me because I could see the off just
being laid out and how she was targeted to help
funnel this.
Speaker 2: So what she kept telling.
Speaker 3: Me is there are these books that at this minimum
of ten of them are She kept saying, you know,
this is required reading. And she kept giving me all
these books and she said, I'll give you a minimum
of ten on Trump being.
Speaker 2: The anti Christ. And of course she really believes this.
Speaker 3: But I'm thinking, Wow, this is so elaborate that they've
been built in order for this many books to have
been written on this subject, Like who's even planting the seed? Right?
Speaker 2: Like people don't just come up with this idea ten
twenty thirty years ago that Trump is somehow.
Speaker 1: Okay, nice, just to back the listeners. Constant Comby is
an author who wrote many books, one including Hidden Dangers
of the Rainbow that I covered on Rockfinn about the
UN and the creation of the UN and how the
rainbow is not necessarily a symbol for alternate lifestyles. It's
actually the seven rays of theosophy. Right, So when you
see this rainbow everywhere, this is when theosophy has conquered
you know the Western world with mysticism, yes, and so
theosophy is Luciferian, gnostic, it's a lot of things, yes.
Speaker 3: And al chemical hermeticism right, and her meticism has the
seven principles also, although there's the unspoken principle.
Speaker 2: I did a show covering this of care. We call
it care, and this is there.
Speaker 3: It's kind of simple, similar to their first principle of mentalism,
but it's like wherever your attention goes that, you know,
manifestation follows. And I was talking about it because there
is an unofficial sustainable development goal of zero and there's
this public global public public relations firm that has a
suggested they already do pr for the UN, but now
they're talking about doing an official merger, and they've proposed
this like unofficial development goal of zero, and zero makes
a lot of sense, right ground zero.
Speaker 2: You know, it's a year zero. It's a great reset.
This is so zero.
Speaker 3: But zero is also holistic and that's a big theme
for the un And this what is this unofficial goal?
Speaker 2: It's the it's the goals. Is the sustainable development goal
of joy.
Speaker 3: And I thought this was very interesting because I think
it's tied to this hermetic principle, hermetic principle, the eighth
Hermetic principle that's unofficial of care because it's care about joy.
But it's also tied to the Kamala Harris Walls campaign.
They keep talking about joy. They're the running on this
like campaign of joy, and it's very reminiscent of the
Nazi Germany Strength through.
Speaker 2: Joy and that was all about like.
Speaker 3: Luxury and uh, you know, like cruises and vacations in
this very tough time and it was of course a
propaganda campaign.
Speaker 2: And so I just think all of it is. I
think it's related. But it's interesting.
Speaker 1: I think so too, Okay, because we were trying to
make this thread so and the first time you ever
hear things like law of attraction and everything that came
out there in two thousands, the secret and what the
bleep do we know all that that came from isis
on veil?
Speaker 2: Yep?
Speaker 1: And so theosophy becomes the un and it's all about
one world religion syncretic religion. And then the Pope just
says this.
Speaker 3: Yes, I can't find my I like mock, but I
wrote underneath. I was like, so it's really not all
about magic. And I remember what else I said, because
your last quote, your last tweet is a little misleading.
You're not really guiding us into this like dark magic.
Speaker 2: I don't remember the rest of what I said, right, But.
Speaker 1: So and then we have this visualization of light and
the will of God, but their God is actually the Antichrist.
And now we've got our General Michael Powers steading into
the right wing. And I just saw that they bought
thirty three thirty three billboards, oh boy, thirty three with
Michael and Trump on them in the Swing States to
try to link that Trump is God's candidate.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so this is what this is why I was
like so distraught when Constance was telling me this, because
I'm like, Okay, they're creating a dialectical pole. You've got
one half of the right. I mean it's not half,
but it's a it's a poll dialectical pole. But you've
got these people on the right who think Trump is
like a deified figure, you know, he's somehow you know,
like a saint or an angel messenger from God.
Speaker 2: And then you've got the people on the other side
of the right.
Speaker 3: Who are these counter Theosophists. There are people like Constance
and her followers who think he's the Antichrist. And I'm like,
this is perfect for you know, the people of the
un who want to divide and rule to create this splinter.
They've now splintered, and they've done this in so many ways,
but this is one example of splintering the right so
that they can create this, uh you know, competing faction. Yeah,
you've got these people who think he's the anti Christ,
and now you've got these people who think he's somehow
God or you know, like a vehicle.
Speaker 1: He's an avatar of Michael the archangel.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yes, now you.
Speaker 3: Have people roping him into saying the prayer right, which
for the theosophis is a symbol of Theaytan, but it's.
Speaker 2: Their god right. So did General Flynn read the prayer
from Elizabeth Claire prophet, Yes, yes.
Speaker 1: Yes he did. Oh my gosh, I forgot about her. Yes,
get your popword and this is so crazy.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: So they say, using the creative imagination project a lighted
seed of will energy into the heart of the thought
form under construction on sustainable development for all in connection
with the Summit of the Futures see myriad streams of
living will energy connected to it by co workers around
the world. So the co workers are.
Speaker 3: The esoteric yeah people, the love and light, the good
will workers, the good Will servers, the ones we go
to that festival every year, I think every seven years
they do the good Will Festival.
Speaker 1: So do you think this invocation of Michael has anything
to do with this.
Speaker 2: Rare Yeah? I do.
Speaker 1: Okay, I do too.
Speaker 2: I do.
Speaker 1: Continue. So they said reflect for amw minutes on the
seed thought. And it's funny that they're making thought forms,
so thought forms toolpas at Gregor's they call them. So
these are just things that they that can come into
reality just by giving it attention. And there's there's some
truth to this because you can create a person, yeah,
and a Gregor by thinking about them, talking about them,
posting them, sharing them. Yeah, like they can just get inflated, inflated,
inflated into a giant toolba right exactly, And uh, it's
all it's the attention that makes them grow. Yes, So
they said human planning today is one of the first
indications of the emergence of the will aspect and the
game I will.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry to cut you off, but I do want
to address that because will you know this is like
Nietzschean will to power. This is a Uhlien Yeah exactly.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So that and that's what they're to there.
Speaker 3: They they're believing that they they're the ubermints, right, they're
creating this class of people who will be spiritually evolved
everybody else. So they they talk about and they like
I brought up through Slipton, He's one of these evolutionary
leaders who believes we evolve or we die. Right, So
they talk about how they're not specifically Darwinian because Darwin
believed in natural selection. They don't like natural selection because
it breeds competition, individual individuality. And of course we talked
about this on the past two shows. With the whole
notion of what they're doing is to usher in the
age of aquaria, which is out of pisces, which is individualism.
Speaker 2: They're moving into the.
Speaker 3: Aquarian collective and they believe that they are the Psychean network.
This is a Maslowian term, but it's relevant because Maslow
influenced people like Barbara Marx Hubbard, who created the Conscious
Evolution Foundation, which was funded by the Rockefellers, you know,
the Center for Integral Wisdom, also, all of these organizations.
Speaker 2: But this idea of.
Speaker 3: Conscious evolution is where and it's very much tied to
theosophy because they believe that they will spiritually evolve and
they're going to collectively spiritually evolve and everybody who do
and those who are left behind if you will, uh
you know, well, they just will no longer cease to be.
Speaker 1: Be recycled, yes, into cosmic energy. Yes, right, it doesn't
sound that bad. Maybe FEMA will come and recycle you.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So, oh, we were talking about triangles and then the
second part of the prayer was talking about within the
square and serve my fellow men. So what do you
make of that? That is super Masonic? Right, because all
Masons say they start out as a rough ashlar or
a cube or a stone that needs you know, working
on chiseling, and they become the perfect ashlar. The cube,
the square, uh is obviously one of the working tools
of Freemason, the compass and square that's the bottom the
ruler thing, right, al Chemical also square is masculine, and
there's mystical things about you know, squaring the circle and
putting the triangle inside the circle and inside the square
and all that if you want to study alchemy. But
it's yeah, it's super magical, it's Masonic, it's the theosophical,
it's all of these things. It's got Christian flavors.
Speaker 3: Yes, Christianese, yeah, the veneer of Christianese, which is designed
to lure Christians in the and to mislead them, right, yes, yeah.
Speaker 1: And we talk about Kris Looms sometimes. You know, it's
like that you can be a Christian, but you're spiritually
Islamic because you want to you know, oppress women and
like do all these other crazy extreme measures that are
not Christian at all.
Speaker 3: Well, who runs the un it's mostly the Islamic order, true, yeah, no,
but nobody talks about that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So they say, visualize the pulsating nucleus of light
at the heart of the thought form being fanned into
a flame by the group. Gaze and see its radiation
touching the consciousness of all participants at the summit.
Speaker 2: Wow, so they're doing seances.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yes, highmind borg visualization rituals to create these thought forms.
And I don't even know man like this gets so
even for me. They say quietly, to sound the Great Invocation.
Imagine hearing it being chanted by the Worldwide Group as
you do so, visualize the outpouring of light and love
and power through the five planetary inlets London, Dark, Geling.
I guess that's in India, New York, Tokyo, and Geneva.
Oh yep. Have you heard of these planetary inlets?
Speaker 2: I don't think I have, so I guess.
Speaker 1: Just cities with big groups of well.
Speaker 2: I think there. Most of them are have you in headquarters?
Speaker 1: So right, like cities with the thing tanks and the Yeah, okay,
but it's interesting.
Speaker 2: I didn't know that. Apparently the city of London runs
that the River of Thales runs through it, but that's
also known as the River of Isis.
Speaker 1: Oh really, well, that makes perfect sense.
Speaker 2: I know I didn't know that, but I'm yeah, that
makes sense.
Speaker 1: I didn't either, Okay, So imagine all of these groups
from Tokyo, Geneva, New York, London are gealing, and all
of this energy is flowing into the future at un
headquarters in New York. And then they have this rayer,
from the point of light within the mind of God,
let light stream forth into human minds. Let light descend
on Earth. And this light they're talking about is Blisfer.
Speaker 2: Yes, the light Bearer.
Speaker 1: Yeah. From the point of love within the heart of God,
Let love stream forth into human hearts. May the Coming
One return to Earth.
Speaker 2: So they are invoking a messiah, yes, the anti Christ,
Lord Monteria. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So from the center where the will of God is known,
let purpose guide all little human wills, the purpose which
the masters know and serve, so all of our little
wills are turned towards their big goal, which is manifesting
the Antichrist on Earth in New York City.
Speaker 2: Yep.
Speaker 1: From the center which we call the human race, Let
the plan of love and light work out and may
seal the door where evil dwells.
Speaker 2: Yep. And there you have it.
Speaker 1: Let light and love and power restore the plan on Earth.
Om om om. So it's also got your Eastern uh
Hindu om.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 3: So if I were like Hindu, a Buddhist, or you know,
really just any of these Eastern practices.
Speaker 2: That they've appropriated.
Speaker 3: I mean that essentially what they've done, I would be
very upset because they take the cherry pick, they take
the elements of it, and they incorporate it to serve
their tilas, you know, So they're not doing justice.
Speaker 1: Dude.
Speaker 3: They make it sound like they love these Eastern religions,
but they don't really because they've cherry picked the parts
that serve their telos and they've completely misappropriated those religions.
I'm not I'm not saying this as somebody who is
a Hindu, a Hindu or Buddhist, you know, but if
I were, I'd be actually very upset because they're not
serving them.
Speaker 1: And like you pointed out, they always act like they're
serving women. They're not. No.
Speaker 2: Oh no.
Speaker 3: I mean so most of this active for the future,
and like this this Summit for the Future that they did,
they kept talking about that, how you know, we want
to serve women and we have to include women. And
there were some interviews with people were like someone who
was on a climate Justice board something like that I
don't know the name of what the board she was,
but it's something climate justice related. And she kept talking
about what the really important thing that we need to
understand is that the UN stands for women and that
women are going to be we need to have women
be leaders at the UN. So I was like, really,
this the h the organization that supports like Shuria law,
is somehow going to be advocating for women, right.
Speaker 1: And don't you and troops get in troubles a lot
for misconduct when they go into places. Yes, I've heard
a lot of reports about essay and other things worse.
Speaker 2: Yes, but you have to But somehow they're all for women.
I guess maybe that's kind to women. I don't know.
Speaker 1: So now we've got some thought leaders yes, that have emerged,
and it just gets worse and worse. Like I don't
I guess I can say like.
Speaker 2: JP, yes, and RB right, yes, his ty lighties. Yes.
Baptizing people, well, apparently that's what Christ's consciousness is.
Speaker 1: I mean, I went through that phase when I was
young and we ate a bunch of mushrooms in summer
and we were like baptizing in the kiddie pool. But
that was on psychedelics. Okay, that was not in a
sober state of mind, but it's just so weird too.
Speaker 3: Well, they talk about that too, right, because the psychedelics
are I mean basically all of these mystery cults they worship.
Speaker 2: Actually, at the World.
Speaker 3: Parliament of Religions, they've now included I don't remember if
it was in twenty eighteen or twenty twenty three, but
it fairly recently they incorporated the religion.
Speaker 2: Of Ayahuasca to the World Parliament of Religions.
Speaker 3: And it's because all of these like psychedelic so mushrooms
would be included.
Speaker 2: I know they're natural.
Speaker 3: But there's people like Peter Tiel who are working on
synthetic variations of these things. So and I don't know,
I just can't help. But when you start seeing mushrooms
on children's clothing and monitor stores, I'm sorry, this is
non organic movement, but the cottage core right, yeah, I'm like, really,
when di've mushroom become fashion statement, I'm sorry that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, something's going on here.
Speaker 3: But they talk about how it's because when you take
these psychedelics, then all boundaries and all distinctions become blurred
and eradicated, and of course, think they're closer to God,
and you know, they have all the noses because they've
had this experience, they've been on the strip.
Speaker 2: And so for people who want to.
Speaker 3: Use, you know, these means as a they want to
blurw all these boundaries so that they can control you
and do mind control experiments.
Speaker 2: It's a very useful tool. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And if you've ever known somebody who does you know, psychedelics,
like or even for the first time they come out
of it, they think they know everything, right, Like they
have all the answers to everything in the universe and
now like my ego's destroyed, so I'm finally better than everyone.
Speaker 2: Yes, right, every time.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and they usually had a bunch of orgies in
the process too.
Speaker 2: Somehow that's always involved.
Speaker 1: You can't not have the orgies, Like that's the point.
Speaker 2: That's the thing, Like.
Speaker 1: Look at Diddy, right, it's all about Yeah, it's not
the only one. So these are like dominoes, you know,
Diddy first, and then jay Z and Beyonce and.
Speaker 2: Like and even in the political sphere.
Speaker 3: So now we're seeing all this like Gaye porn with
Corey de'angelis, right, So somehow the uh yeah, it's like
it's the ancient the ancient pactics have not gone away.
Speaker 2: They it's all the same.
Speaker 3: The pederasti is the tool for the blackmail, for the induction,
for a ritual sheet of rituals and initiation rituals sorry,
and of course for trauma basedline control.
Speaker 1: And so people who were just in the academic sphere yes,
are pivoting. So they go from psychology yes, pop psychology
acting yes. And now these are the religious leaders up
there with you know, Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson, And
it's just like, how did these people pull out in
front and they're doing super goofy stuff and they're not
even so in the case of like JP, he's not
even a convert to anything.
Speaker 3: No, but he has been groomed as a great false prophet.
So I've done you know, shows on him and his
organization and the ties. How then they claim that they're
going to be, you know, a counter to the World
Economic Forum, and they very conveniently their funding is coming
straight from the clients of the World's Economic Form, so
essentially the same thing. Yeah, but somehow they're going to
counter the World Economic Form.
Speaker 2: But what was very concerning.
Speaker 3: About it is he's using this again Christianese is very
Christian veneer to smuggle in this esoteric messaging. And I
went recently to hear him speak. You know, this was
before his latest book was released. Be great to get
a deal where you're paid like hundreds of thousands of
dollars for a book you haven't even written yet.
Speaker 2: It's a really great gig if you can get ahead.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but he So I went mostly as reconnaissance, like
I was just kind of curious what is he?
Speaker 2: And of course this is the Wrestle with God tour, right,
and in it he's he does.
Speaker 3: He's very long, bloviating, kind of pontification speeches. And I
think it's very enticing for people because we live in
sound bite society, and sound bite society, people don't spend
a lot of time thinking.
Speaker 2: You know, most people don't read. Most people really don't even.
Speaker 3: Spend much time just with their own thoughts, let alone
read and then process that. I but thinking, like, actually
that that process of thinking and having sitting with your
thoughts is how we form our own identity.
Speaker 2: So it's actually.
Speaker 3: Really integral to what it means to be human, and
so we crave it. And I think much like somebody
might go watch movies or listen to music so that
you can have a visceral emotional experience that you might
not have access to. I mean, some people don't allow
themselves to just cry in public, or to get really angry,
or they have trouble accessing some of those, or even
to feel you know, tremendous like a static joy. Some
people have trouble accessing those. And that's part of why
we like entertainment, where we can allow ourselves to, you know,
in a dark theater, feel those things. And I think
it's really similar. He's become that for uh, intellectuals who
don't have to you know, deep thought process so now
vicariously because they've listened to him bloviate for five minutes
when he could have said something in five words. Yeah,
I feel like they've actually done this really deep elaborate
thought processes. But they haven't. They've just vicariously through their profit.
And when you listen to him speak, he sounds like
he's being groomed to be a prophet, I think, a
false prophet.
Speaker 2: And he wears that two face suit.
Speaker 1: He will take a joker yes or yeah, like two face.
Speaker 2: Two face.
Speaker 3: He talks about how he was split in half when
he was in Russia in rehab, you know, and I
don't know. I mean, I'm just gonna say I think
he was mk Oltru, but I actually would take it
a step further and we can say I'm just crazy,
you know, making these wild theories.
Speaker 2: So just pining ony, I'm cuckoo. But he So the
organization that is.
Speaker 3: ARC right when you go all the way back right,
Legatum is funding it. And when you go look through
the files, the funding files on the GATAM they started
out as Prosperity UK twenty sixteen, that's their initial filing.
And what happened in twenty sixteen twenty sixteen was when
he catapulted on the scene for arguing against Bill C
sixteen in Canada, which was the pronounce bill. And now
this could all just be coincentence, but I think it's
very interesting that a professor gets catapulted to fame and
becomes the figure of the quote unquote al right, that's
what they labeled him. Is he's not even conservative, let
alone all right, Like that's kind of just ludicrous to
even think that. First of all, he's Canadian, I mean
Canadian conservativism is actually very different than what it would
even mean in the United States if we were to
even go based on ideology, you know, psophogal roots, which
I don't think even apply here. But they labeled him
as being, you know, this crazy, wild alt right figure,
and they there was this really looks like a whole
media campaign around him, and then people are watching his lectures,
like his college lectures. You can't get most people to
read a book. Now suddenly they're watching like year long
lectures from a professors psychology professor. So I think, I
don't think it's organic, but you know, maybe it's just
the crazy coincidence. And this organization that is now the
primary funding source behind you is an Alliance Responsible Citizenship.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So there's just too many weird things about that. I mean,
when he first started, he would go on like public
access talking about like in cells and red pill talking points. Right,
so he's the literally wearing a fedora. Yes, okay, so
he kind of is the granddaddy of the disenfranchised male,
young male.
Speaker 5: And then who's his audience then to clean their room? Yeah,
so he's daddy, Yes, clean your room, bucco. Yep, they
all look up to him.
Speaker 1: Then he was like, but he was also pushing pharmaceuticals
with his daughter. They're on Access television. Yes, And so
he's kind of I don't want to say fomenting, but
definitely putting bringing this out of people that men are
so lonely and women are so cold, and uh, there's
nothing that young men can do, and like kind of
victimize it a little bit.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, and.
Speaker 3: He's also I mean people seem to forget he's like
a he worshiped Young He's like Jungian guru leader, right,
who's now supposedly a Christian leader, which is strange. Young
actually said you wanted to overthrow Christianity. I mean he
was a mythran. He worshiped the you know, got a
mithro and he talked also about psychedelic you know trips
as a conduit to you know, ascension, and and this
is who he talks about all the time.
Speaker 2: This is like his you know hero is.
Speaker 3: So I don't know, I think it's Yeah, so to
talk about him victimizing these people, I think it kind
of makes sense.
Speaker 1: It's and I know they're gonna say no. He tries
to help, like by telling them to clean their room.
And these others twelve stupid things and you made a
good Like he's the opposite of profound, because a profound
person can take a really complex idea and simplify it
so a lot of people can understand it. What he
does is the exact opposite. Is takes the simple and
like stretches it out and makes it super complex, just
because he likes to hear himself.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I don't want to be a hater, but I just
see things like if does that make sense? Like I've
just people. I love everyone in Christ like wey, but
I I don't trust you, no, okay, rb jp uh
dt all of these dudes, I don't trust them.
Speaker 2: No, I don't trust any of them.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so rb uh Yeah, he is very very concerning.
He is a former addict, right, and I think there
is a tremendous amount of narcissism involved.
Speaker 2: I think with g B also, you know they're kind of.
Speaker 3: Raging narcissists and they both were addicts. And there's a
really great document. It's you can pull it off CIA
dot gov. But it's from Mice to Rascals and this
is about how they recruit assets, so essentially change agents,
which I would are both of them qualify to be
great change agents? And they talked some MYCE stands for money, ideology, coercion,
and ego, and they were saying how after World War
Two they realized that you know, they they don't say
this explicitly, but through my research, I really think that
it came out of the War Office selection boards that
were done at Tavistock. And this was like right after
Operation Phoenix at Tabstoc where they restructured and then they
did this. They did these new testing kind of protocols
to figure out how they could.
Speaker 2: Select their their selection board members.
Speaker 3: And this became a new strategy for the OSS, like
how they were which became CIA, and how they were
going to recruit.
Speaker 2: People and how they would pick their leaders.
Speaker 3: And they talk about it as like an intelligence test,
but they say it wasn't really an intelligence test. And
what I really think it was that when you listen
to their when you read their words, what they're really
saying is like mental adaptability, which is great for a
change agent, right, somebody who can be groomed. But anyway,
they decided that rascals was a better term. And if
I can remember correctly, I think rascals is reciprocity, authority,
S is scarcity, and then L is liking and the
other s is for I don't remember the other s,
but anyway, it's all very similar. Oh the c sorry
that it was again like coercion and compromise, that's all
very similar. But the reason I brought it up is
because I think they meet the profile for people who
would be great change agents, and that document kind of
lays out exactly what they're looking for.
Speaker 1: About ten years ago, I wrote an article about Katy
Perry and RB and I remember back on the Red
Carpet when she was acting weird and he was flashing
her little things to say, obay on it.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: I have a clip of that, and one of his
shows had the logo of the X and the O,
and I was like, well, that's pretty weird because I
was really deep into Kenneth Grant at that time, like
why is he using that as a symbol for his show?
If you're interested in that, you can go to rock
Fan look for it's called Alicehratrolling. The Hidden God is
the book that I did the book report on about
the Mark of the Beast, which also happened to be
his TV show logo.
Speaker 2: Wow, all the last one is social proof. Sorry oh sorry,
go ahead, No, the last one is the last s
is so.
Speaker 1: Oh social proof, okay, And it's it's it's so hard
because I don't want to discourage people's conversion. But at
the same time, I don't think you go from uh,
you know, first becoming Christian to baptizing people within the
span of a couple.
Speaker 2: Of months and you're whity tidies and be.
Speaker 1: Eating prayers in front of thousands of people. I mean,
it's just not how you do things, Like I don't
properly categoriz Like I grew a Protestant and it was
a it's a free for all, right, right, anybody can
be a cult leader. Anybody can open a church and
baptize and you know, do all the goofy stuff. But
that's when you start to have all of these weird
ideas about what Christianity is. So like, when you're catechized
in the church, you figure out like, okay, we have
all of these rules because of decorum, and so we
know that people are sincere. So people don't just take
this and run with it and start their own cult
or whatever. Like we have protocols right, the quorum, yes, right,
And so people don't question are you doing this because
I don't if it takes you a couple of years
to to join and you have to learn like humility,
and then you have to go through the period where
you don't teach because you're still learning, right right. Yeah,
and so me, I mean, we did that show about
that OnlyFans, a girl Nala who went straight from OnlyFans
to some kind of woman preacher and setting up a
like content creation station for other girls to uh, you know,
the the pipeline version. So it's just another money making thing.
So what I'm saying is within the church, there are
ways that you can go about this, so nobody questions
if you're real or not, if this is goofy. You
don't make Christianity look crazy.
Speaker 2: They've done that. Yeah, so many are being deceived by it.
Speaker 3: I mean that's what's just really crazy to watch. And
then the backlash against people who are warning like you
hate Christianity, You're like you're anti you know whatever, Like
I I if you called out the archangel Michael Prayer
reading like you're anti Catholic, It's like no, First of all,
the amount of Catholics I've talked to who said they've
never read that prayer, Like it's just not very typical.
I'm not saying it doesn't exist, it's but it's not
like something that is.
Speaker 2: Very familiar to them. And so but suddenly like Trump
is reading it. I mean, it's is a little strange.
Speaker 1: Is Medatron Michael? What do you know? Metatron? The New
Age Angel?
Speaker 2: That's a vaguely familiar.
Speaker 1: But I'm not the Medatron is m I c h.
Speaker 3: M hmm.
Speaker 1: Okay, never mind says Metatron is not the same as
Michael the Archangel. Okay mmm.
Speaker 2: But here's another really interesting about he is Metatron.
Speaker 1: Well, it says in the Apocalypse Observable Metatron is not Enoch.
He's identified as the archangel Michael. So Metatron is.
Speaker 3: Like a New Age Yes, okay, that's why I sound
it familiar. Yeah, because they think he's that ar change
on Michael's essentially the Satan.
Speaker 1: This is getting so crazy.
Speaker 3: So I wanted to forget the Jim Fetzer, you know,
like the Fetzer Institute. There was a big debate about
the logo and you can find this on the Wayback Machine,
and the old logo actually had like the the m
and like.
Speaker 2: Wings, Oh really, yeah, it is Archangel Michael.
Speaker 3: And Fetzer talked about how he channeled our changel Michael,
and he was saying that the importance of channeling channeling
the archangel Michael was so they could usher in the
age of Aquarius.
Speaker 1: Who shoos the channel Metatron Santana. Oh that's right, remember, yes,
And they're like, we'll get your sick chance from and
he's like a channel Metatron.
Speaker 2: That's right. I didn't off put that together.
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, so this has been around for a little while.
Speaker 2: That's what I'm saying. This off has been like brewing
for so long.
Speaker 3: Yes, I think roping trump in Is has been in
the works for a really long time also.
Speaker 1: And it really sucks because I see a lot of
smart people on Twitter, like really struggling who are non
Christian and they're seeing all this and like, see, I
told you guys, this is so goofy, and then they're
getting attacked and I'm like, they're actually right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I know, I know.
Speaker 1: And the whole like crisis king thing is kind of
suss to me too, because you see people kind of
just using this as a of course crisis king, but
to use it in your like Twitter or whatever. I
feel like it's just another tool.
Speaker 2: It's atget prop.
Speaker 3: I mean that's been intentionally woven into the vernacular to
be agit prop. So who it targets? Anybody who is
not Christian? Right, So this is just seu division.
Speaker 2: And it's also.
Speaker 3: I think they don't realize that, yes, Christians may view
chrisis king, although I've never heard a Christian say.
Speaker 2: This prior to two years ago. They may have.
Speaker 3: Thought it, they may have lived their life that way,
but I didn't hear them parading that around. That wasn't
like a thing, you know. But who has been making
that a thing?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 3: Maybe she's a daytime talk show host. Yeah, her name
might be Oprah.
Speaker 2: She's the same person who at the DNC said Joe. Yeah.
So she's also talking about Joy. There's a lot of c.
Speaker 3: Yes, she said christ is can well no, she said,
oh Joy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, she was talking about the Joy campaign.
Speaker 3: But yeah, she's a but she has said yeah, she
was talking about christ consciousness on her show for like
well over a decade, and she platformed every single one
of these, like New Thought theosophical leaders, I mean Deepak Chopra.
The list is really long, but and she would talk
about christ consciousness, and what they're talking about is not Christ.
Speaker 2: They're not talking about Jesus Christ.
Speaker 3: They're talking about Lord Matreya or Buddha Christiana.
Speaker 2: It's a world teacher.
Speaker 3: So if that's just it, you have to understand whenever
you hear anything from the un there's exoteric messaging that
make love and light and that sounds great, but what
is the esoteric mesaging? And they have workshops on this.
The Arcane School says that, and in the words of
Alice Bailey, they talk about we need to teach the
esoteric teachings to the people who are you know, consciously evolved,
so you know, their whole psychean network will be trained
in this esoteric messaging. But unfortunately the masses are being
led astray.
Speaker 1: It's so insidious. Yes, yes, because and I feel like
tinfoil hat conservatives. Christians are like the thirstiest group for
camaraderie because they're so niche yes that anybody that even
says something close to what they agree with, they latch
onto them like.
Speaker 2: Andrew, Yes, I know, occult of personality.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and they're like, oh, he's on our side, and
I'm like, he's just using words that you like, like
it's so frustrating.
Speaker 2: Yes, is a very very frustrating.
Speaker 3: But I think as we're heading in it's going to
be we have a I do think the election is relevant,
and we have a I don't know how many weeks left,
it's like a month, and I think we have not
even had our October surprise yet.
Speaker 2: But I think we're going.
Speaker 3: To see a lot more of these types of splintering
operations and splinters. Yes, right, yes, that's I think exactly
what we're going to see. I hope people use some
discernment to use the Christian word, but yeah, I'm not
seeing a whole lot of it. I'm seeing a lot
of reactionary behavior.
Speaker 1: What frustrates me so much is like people can't see demons. Yeah,
you literally can't see how bad his person is or
whatever is controlling them, Yeah, through them, and they just
they love Barabbas. I don't know how to put it.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: So I do not think that Trump is like a
defied figure, and I don't think he's a savior, but
he is the only person talking about defunding the UN
and yeah, and I know those are just words, but
he did make motion in that direction in you know,
when he was in office. Laugh.
Speaker 2: And the UN has.
Speaker 3: Repeatedly said that they are really afraid they can't survive
another Trump administration.
Speaker 2: So there was a leak to a video that.
Speaker 3: Stephen Crowder got from someone at the UN talking about
how they don't think they can survive another Trump administration.
Speaker 2: The reason for this is because the.
Speaker 3: United States funds twenty seven percent of the UN. That's
almost a third, so that's a huge portion of their
funding is coming straight from the United States. There was
also a couple of videos I saw from some people
like Alex Newman was interviewing people at the He was
in New York and he interviewed people at the UN.
There were some others and they asked he asked like,
you know, what are your thoughts on Trump?
Speaker 2: And they all said they're they're terrified.
Speaker 3: So again, I don't it's not that I think he's
like I have a lot of issues with him, to
be really handed, But if we can get out of
the UN, that's just like a huge monumental step in
the right direction.
Speaker 1: Yes, I said, all was time we need to break
up with the rest of the world and just worry
about ourselves.
Speaker 3: Yes, right, I mean if you have children, right, if
you have a family, you don't say, oh my goodness,
I can't really feed my children but invite the rest
of the world over for dinner. No, not that you
don't want to feed the rest of the world if
you could, but you know, if people are in need,
of course you want to help them.
Speaker 2: But you would say, this is my family, I got
to take care of them. I'm gonna feed my children first, right, Yeah,
so maybe we could do that, like take care of
our children here at home.
Speaker 1: First, Courtney, that makes too much sense.
Speaker 3: I don't know. I know, it's a crazy idea.
Speaker 1: What you just need to meditate more and envision your
giant beam of light directing the will of Metatron.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's where I went wrong. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Have you ever heard of Bashar? No, So he's a
scoofy like, uh, channeler of aliens. And we'll land on
this because we've been going but he I used to
watch him when I believed in aliens, but now it's
just funny to me. He says there and he answers
all your questions and he's.
Speaker 6: Like, mcha, honey, not that, but he just like he
channels the aliens and they answer all your questions, and
he goes, I'm.
Speaker 1: Not permitted to tell you the future. But if you
get a female president, then uh what was Oh, you
will have full disclosure. If you get a male president,
you will have nuclear wark.
Speaker 2: Oh so like h oh boy. Yeah, I'm sure that
they're having a field day without.
Speaker 1: Fake aliens or fake World War three with one.
Speaker 2: I don't really want either one. Is there another option?
Speaker 1: No, oh, you have to have one.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm opting out.
Speaker 1: I never voted, do you.
Speaker 3: I do know that that's crazy, so I'm concerned about
that too, though I now I understand you know, I
support your You've done this long before there.
Speaker 2: Was this in play.
Speaker 3: But I will say this, I am pretty sure there
is a concerted active measure. I can't prove it, but again,
here I am with all the theories, but I've just
seen so much evidence indicated. And some of the people
who are foment this narrative, I actually do think are
operatives like maybe actual you know, seeing eye kind of operatives,
will say, but they're and I personally know more people
than I can count on both hands who have said
they've heard some of these people and that they were
going to vote for Trump, but they are not going
to vote at all anymore. They're a very conservative active
ever effort to active measure effort to get people not
to vote at all.
Speaker 2: And I this does not help who does it help?
It helps Kamala every single one of the.
Speaker 3: People who would have this is why I say, like,
it's not just a anti conservative kind of an operation
that's going on. Is what's happened is they've splintered and
there's this group where it's like the left, and then
there's everybody else. Could there are a lot of people
who are not they're not conservative, they're not right wing,
but they're just like the left has gone crazy. They've
always been crazy, but you know that's their there how
they make sense of it.
Speaker 2: They're like the left has gone crazy. I don't want
to be a part of that.
Speaker 3: But the people who run these types of operations are
very clever and they recognize that, and so of course
they they in part created it because we saw this
back four years ago, right there was this anybody who
didn't go along with the narrative. Uh, you know in
some the the health arena, if you will, it were
suddenly labeled right wing, and a lot of these people.
Speaker 2: Are not right wing.
Speaker 3: I mean actually people who were against being forced to
take certain things uh historically were actually left leaning. But
now they were able to put this new banner or
new labor label on them and put them into a
new box, and that box becomes much more suggestible to
new marketing. And that's what we're seeing now. And so
all this to say, I am actually very concerned about
this measure that's going on that's convincing a lot of
people not to.
Speaker 2: Vote at all, because these people would have voted for Trump.
Speaker 3: And again I say, this is somebody who has a
lot of issues with Trump, but I really feel like
it may be a lesser of two evils kind of thing,
but I think he's a much better option right now.
And if he doesn't win, unfortunately, we're not in a
situation where we have another option.
Speaker 2: It's going to be Kamala in malls.
Speaker 3: And I think they're going to head us down a
bad path really quickly.
Speaker 1: Well, whatever can stop the hemorrhaging of the immigration, well
it's not going to be for them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's not them. The borders are She's she's not
going to do it. Now, so yeah, we need that.
Speaker 1: So well, thank you for coming and gossiping with me
about you and all these characters that we are subject to.
It's like a lot of these people, everything I know
about them is against my will. I'm like, I wish
I never heard of them, but me too. We are
praying for the people in North Carolina and East Tennessee.
This is worse than anybody actually realizes because the mainstream
media is not reporting in at all. Everything I learned
I learned from TikTok. Yes, yep, we send all of
our prayers to them, not the un prayers, the actual one.
Speaker 2: Oh no, yeah, not the inverted prayers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and so thank you for coming on my show.
I know you are so busy, but we always love
seeing you, and you always know so much about any
topic I want to go down. You are like right
there with me, So we really appreciate it. Courtney Turner,
And tell us what's next and where we can find you?
Speaker 3: Ah?
Speaker 2: What is next? Well? Yeah, We've got a lot on
the a lot of.
Speaker 3: Shows coming out, and I'm speaking next weekend in New Orleans, Yeah,
which I should not be doing because I getting married
in three weeks and I have a lot to do for.
Speaker 1: That, but nothing last from you. You probably have something
book like the day before, in the day after.
Speaker 2: I do. I do, But yeah, I think I have
fifteen shows in the next like two weeks.
Speaker 3: But yeah, So I am speaking and it's actually Magafest
and I do tell them actually because I was very
concerned about that.
Speaker 2: It's like, I'm not really like, you know, like a
raw ra.
Speaker 3: Maga person, because I think the MAGA has been really.
Speaker 2: Co opted as well.
Speaker 3: Unfortunately a lot of them, I think are some of
the people who are behind, you know, the same Q
group who are now doing this our.
Speaker 2: Change on Michael thing. So I think there's a lot
of overlap there. But I told them.
Speaker 3: That I definitely support him over the alternative, and I
think that U there's yeah, there's a lot of reasons
why we historically if we just look through the people
who want to control us versus the people who want
to preserve free will, and he's a better option.
Speaker 2: So they were very supportive of that. And so I
will be.
Speaker 3: Speaking to New Orleans this weekend and uh, yeah, you
have a bunch of good shows coming out lined up,
and yeah, and you find me at Courtney Turner dot com.
I spell my name like Courteney though the c O
U r t e n A y t U r
n e r dot com.
Speaker 1: We'll go over there to Courtney Turner dot com. And
I was there a couple of weeks ago, and she's
got all the best people on this What do we
call it? Oh media? Independent media?
Speaker 2: What are you calling? What are we calling?
Speaker 3: What?
Speaker 2: What is the umbrella?
Speaker 1: You have all the best guests from this amelieu of.
Speaker 3: Uh yeah, I mean I would call it like the yeah,
independent media, but not indeed.
Speaker 2: I label indie media differently.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, okay, So I.
Speaker 3: Feel like indie media has been co opted, right, but independent,
truly independent. I mean I bring people from various different spheres.
I think sometimes like so many things have been co
opted that you just have to use discernment, and you know,
we can learn from We learn from whatever we can
learn from, Like sometimes sometimes we learn the best things
even from like the wrong things.
Speaker 2: Right, A broken talk is right twice a day.
Speaker 3: That doesn't mean it's so those times when it's right,
you have to acknowledge it's right.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, all right, Well, thanks for coming, and everybody
stays safe and we'll see you next time ye, thank you,