Speaker 1: There are some things that hold true. For instance, new
tech sucks munch at the time. Everybody knows that. Here's
another never engage in a land war in Asia during
the winter, right, nobody knows that ain't no pineapple belonging
on any pizza. Word of God is solid base on
which you should build a foundation, and complexity is the
tool of scoundrels. And Bill Gates he's not really concerned
about people making mistakes because he's the common core m
RNA guy.
Speaker 2: Right, Bill, what do you think that relationship is about?
I mean, why is he spent? Why is it that
so many people? I mean, it's understanded why people go
to Mariloko and spend time with Donald Trump. But what
do you think is you say, it's fascinating. What do
you think is the basis of that relationship between Musk
and Trump? I know that's a question for Elon Musk,
and I'll happily ask him if I ever get the chance.
Speaker 3: You know, people in the private sector are often frustrated
by government, and of course government could be somewhat more efficient.
Then again, the government's not supposed to be the same
as the private sector, and so there's a you know,
a whole history of people from the private sector thinking
they can, you know, get government to be better, and
in many cases they they don't go about it in
the right way. And you know, government it's it's not
there's not many cases where somebody's actually, uh made it smaller.
So the deregulatory thing, you know, I think there's some uh,
you know, some merit there. But we're gonna have to
be careful. And you do worry when people are trying
to be so radical that they'll make they'll make mistakes.
Speaker 1: And it is to prove the points we bring in
our friend and brother Zach Abraham, Chief and veznufs or
Bower Cuple Management. Think you got almighty for Wise Council.
Speaker 4: Day, but Herman show is one disapproved but big pharma
technocourrecs in Tyre and Sabria. Where from the high mountains
of Free American here's the Emerald City, Exime.
Speaker 5: Todd to her Man.
Speaker 1: Today is a day the Lord has made in These
are the times to which God has decided we shall live.
And we will start our discussion with our friend and brother,
Zach Abraham, chief investment offic for both Cupity Management. Welcome
Zach to a constitutional crisis country where brave judges are
saving us from an executive executive.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Well, and then I was just talking to myself in
the break there. I thought we were on.
Speaker 7: What I was telling you is my new intro the
way I'm going to introduce myself from now on as
I'm just going to say, I am science.
Speaker 5: I am I am finance itself.
Speaker 7: Yes, when you're talking to me, you're talking to finances.
Speaker 6: Yeah. How are we doing? How we doing?
Speaker 5: Man? I am I'm a part Art's giddy.
Speaker 1: If you're watching the video, you can see that's because
I've I've given myself a concussion on above my frontal
lobe at the Tanning booth and you knock. I knocked
myself joyful. I'm post deliverance, and I've talked about that.
I went to a deliverance pastor. So the demons are
less affecting me. I love that I feel in the spirit.
But I'm watching and I want to explain to me
and tell me if this makes sense to you. President
Trump is the chief executive of the executive branch, duly elected.
Even the Democrats admit that he is the chief commander
in chief of the military duly elected. Even the Democrats
admit that Congress votes on gobs of money, gives that
money to the executive branches, the bureaucracies. Here's your budget.
The bureaucracies can make changes in that budget. You know,
we need to shift some dallars around and hire some
people in this area. But the chief executive can't. He's
he's not allowed to do that. SOYS has gotten so bizarre.
One of the latest things is a judge has told
the National Institute of Health, the CDC, and the FDA,
you have to put those websites back, the ones about
the gender madness. You have to put them back because
I a judge. I think this judge is in Massachusetts
or Rhode Island, says. So what they're saying, and am
I ever stating this, they're saying to President Trump, you
can be the executive, you just can't executive.
Speaker 7: Right, And so I think the best way, and feel
free to color this, but I think the best way,
not assuming that your listeners don't understand this, but I
think the best way to think about this and the
best way to understand that executive role in the way
that was intended by the founders is think of him
as sort of like a CEO, right Like, the CEO
cannot go against what the board says. But inside of
that space, the CEO has a lot of latitude. So
to say that he can't take the helmet, he actually is.
Probably he's the only person legally that they can, I believe,
outside of a vote from Congress. And I think that
what you've got going on here is just a lot
of obfuscation and a lot of just trying to throw
sticks into the spokes. And you know, you'd probably know
better than I do, But I don't think that there's
any legal standing here.
Speaker 6: I mean, I would assume that that just gets blown
right out of the water.
Speaker 1: I would hope so in the Supreme Court better because
if they don't, you're going to have a delegitimized judiciary
from the bottom one up. And it's it's what they've
said is, yeah, you elected this guy to run the
executive branch, and we decided he can't.
Speaker 5: Yeah, right, so don't buy the voting.
Speaker 6: Right and he has he has fairly unlimited power as
it relates to his implementation of existing law, right Like,
that's sort of the letter of the law kind of
the way the job reads right. If he decides that
that text or that part of the CDC website is
no longer acceptable, there is an anybody legally that can
override him, is there? I mean, there's nobody on the
other side of that decision.
Speaker 1: There's the whole thing. The buck stops here. He's ultimately
responsible for these organizations. Therefore he's ultimately able to bring
accountability to him. Here's what I think happened is Elon
accidentally cracked the code. Now that sounds weird because he's
an engineer and software guy and he understands code.
Speaker 5: He accidentally cracked the code of corruption.
Speaker 1: And you allude to this in a tweet that you
had this week about USAID, and I want to expand
on this in a second. Elon has cracked the code
on corruption and how they do that the same way
that the people that renewed dot Healthcare in Mexico have
cracked the code of excellence. In the stem cell world,
they crack the code this way. They never touch anything
to do with abortion. The stem cell strain I use
has never touched the modified arm injections.
Speaker 5: They use a hyperbaric chamber. They're the largest in North America.
Speaker 1: There's only two of them this big, so you can
get in there and have relative comforts, and that destroys
information in your body. It drives the stem cells further
in your body. The vitamin mintal treatments ats. So you
think it's called that they put in your body and
that stuff will cause you to recover from surgery. In
my case, the difference was forty eight weeks without that
eleven weeks with its same exact surgery.
Speaker 5: So if you're being told it's pills or surgery or hey, good.
Speaker 1: Luck and your two year recovery from your back surgery,
your knee surgery, stop it.
Speaker 5: They crack the code.
Speaker 1: On this stuff, including going to the insane detail of
making their own oxygen so they understand and can testify
to the supply chain they actually produce oxygen instead of
trucking it in.
Speaker 5: Go to renew dot Healthcare. It's r e n ue
dot healthcare.
Speaker 1: Please tell me a part of the Todd Hermanshaw family
that matters for us and it matters for them are
nue dot health Care. So here's here's one of the codes,
say corracked. First of all, there is the open payment field,
so the treasure pays twelve million dollars for what.
Speaker 5: We don't know.
Speaker 1: If you at Bulwark Capital Management received a bill and
it went to your wife, she's a CFO, and it said,
remit twelve million dollars too, or let's size it down
one hundred and twenty thousand here, here's the address. Would
she just say, well, yeah, I don't know what this
is for, but I better pay it. Or what might
she come to you and say, hey, honey, we have
one hundred and twenty thousand dollars bill, but it doesn't
say what it's for, and then you'd probably say, well,
we better pay it. That's yeah, right, that's cracking the
code and coruption. How do you do corruption? You don't
make anybody say what they're buying.
Speaker 6: Right, right, right, And and there's so many soft parts
to this, right, which is influence that advis you in
an industry that maybe you're not corrupt at all. You know,
this is why the crackdown of people.
Speaker 7: If you're going to regulate a certain industry, you shouldnt
be able to have a job there for so long.
And if you don't think this is what's going on, Look,
I think this is really simple to understand, right, any
person regardless of political affiliation, that has paid attention to
anything government related for the last forty years, knows that
government spending is completely out of act, that there's unbelievable
amounts of waste and fraud, and we all know this, right,
and yet when we finally get people looking into it, right,
there's uproar. It really is amazing to me how well
trained the left has got their constituency base. Right, you
finally have disinterested third parties, right, Musk isn't just look guys,
I you know there are people that say, I have
bashed Musk in the past as.
Speaker 5: A vite I will again he's a transhumanist.
Speaker 7: Yeah, And but there is an Aukham's razor thing you
put in here, right, which is if you're telling me
that Musk is doing all this for greed as the
richest man in the world. When I consider the things
he's cutting and what he's attacking, I just see no
correlation there. There's just nothing that well he's doing it
to you extra is what is he going to get
that he doesn't already have from Trump?
Speaker 6: That's that's the other side of it, right.
Speaker 7: I'm not saying that ambition does isn't endless. And I'm
not saying the bill gates the world don't exist. I'm
just saying, what you're doing, if you're a musk, what
he's doing doesn't marry up with the accusations that are
getting levied against him. It just doesn't make any.
Speaker 5: Sense exactly exact.
Speaker 6: I think you got to take it at face value
at this point. I just think that's where Auckham's razor
points you, right, Like everybody.
Speaker 1: In politics has some self interest, right, Okay, so he's
he may be an opportunist, and I want to pay
careful attention to that. He's got a ninety six million
dollar bed to buy or was it open aye?
Speaker 6: Or yeah?
Speaker 5: That is my little word. You wrote this on Twitter.
Speaker 1: All the chatter regarding USAID and all this info being
public is really misleading. Another favorite trick of DC, hence
three thousand page legislation, is to drown out the ugly
truth under an ocean of bureaucratic vernacular and pork barrel bs. Additionally,
many of that this is key. Many of the databases
can't effectively navigate the data.
Speaker 5: Via keyword searches.
Speaker 1: I believe just one of the USA D databases was
one point five terabytes. Certainly no expert, but seeing multiple
tweets makes it sound as if a fourth grader could
have teased out this data.
Speaker 5: Not all the case if it were.
Speaker 1: It's yet another example of a broken the MSM is
and how deeply derelic they've been in the duty to
hold power to account. And this is key here as well.
If you're setting up databases where you want to search
for spending for let's say DEI, Yeah, and forty percent
of the payment fields are left blank, good luck, or
they call it special programs.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 7: And the other part of this, too, which is no
news to you, is the complete flagrant spending that you've
got spending in there that I don't think can be
described as anything other than seditious, Meaning that when your
own government is funding to the tune of thirty six
million dollars an organization who's express point and purpose to
exist is to basically undermine your legal system, how is
that not sedition? And it's like the worst form of sedition, right,
We're like we're cutting our throats with our own knives,
right right, Like it's it's just it's perplexed to me.
And when anybody, when anybody pushes back against transparency or
looking into that or whatever the case may be. Either
they're just completely manipulated.
Speaker 6: And and they've got like a you know, like a
captive mindset, right, there's gonna you know, just repeat anything
you know.
Speaker 7: Or they're part of the problem. Yes, I don't think
there's any way you can carve it up. And the
reason I stated it that way is because I was
hearing all these people going.
Speaker 6: Oh, it's not a big deal. This is so stupid.
You know that that information's already out there, and you go, guys,
information being on a public database that's one point seven terabytes,
when when you don't, you're not there's not even a
keyword search function on that database that isn't just being
out there. And second of all, if it is just
out there, what have you been doing? Right? Why haven't
you gone through it as as an agent of the
press when they're uncovering these are you telling me that
these kinds if things aren't even newsworthy, you just can't
even track the narrative anymore.
Speaker 1: No, And you said this so well. They've got the
left so well trained. It reminds me of a Simpsons episode.
There was a time truly where Springfield's, where they lived,
was overrun with snakes, and so Mayor Quimby came out,
we need to kill the snakes, kill the snakes. And
they had the townspeople with torches and kill the snakes,
kill the snakes, and he gave the speech about how
evil the snakes are.
Speaker 5: And then Lisa Simpson gets on stage. Stop stop, snakes
are friends. They kill rats and.
Speaker 1: Mice and vermin that bring disease, and she gives us
some passion speech and all of a sudden, some towns
personnails save the snakes, and.
Speaker 5: Then Quipman's up there.
Speaker 1: I've said for years, we need to save the snakes,
the holy snakes.
Speaker 5: And this is what they've done with corruption, saved the corruption.
We're here to save the corruption.
Speaker 6: Like for instance, look, let's say, let's see somebody on
the left would have won like whatever I mean, nobody
on the left would have done this.
Speaker 7: Yeah, let's say somebody on the lap of the one
and they were going through usaid like this.
Speaker 6: I'd be sitting there going, well, it wasn't who I
voted for, but good job.
Speaker 5: Uh yeah, right.
Speaker 1: And I always want to boil things down to the
real world. Okay, here's the real world.
Speaker 6: You, Zach, are.
Speaker 5: Talking with twenty of your financial advisors, okay, and you're
going through a portfolio of a deer.
Speaker 1: Client, and you actively manage all the portfolios, you actively
undertake a risk management okay. So you're sitting there looking
a spreadsheet and the client is let's say, twenty five
percent light in their portfolio, and you say, where'd that go?
And your financial advisor goes, I don't know, Yeah, you
didn't go.
Speaker 6: I didn't go anywhere. It's just gone, Yeah, that wouldn't
that wouldn't go very well.
Speaker 5: How does it end?
Speaker 1: I mean, honestly, the boss, how does that conversation end
without your guy with a full on explanation or handcuffs?
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 7: Right, yeah, it's one to two, right, Yeah, it's one
of two ways. And and and that's when you get
to this point. I don't really know what that means,
but when you get to the point where people are
uncovering things that now there's there's there's going to be
a process that these things have to go through to determine,
you know, what they are. Are they out and out fraud?
Are they exactly? So we got to go through a
process with all that, But how.
Speaker 6: Anybody like like, for instance, you'd swear that they were
unearthing documents about the DNC. This isn't like opposition research, right,
This is these are things that are supposed to be
serving all of us with our money. Nobody doesn't benefit
from what's currently going on. And when you sit there
and you have a party that is supposedly progressive and
all of human rights actively trying to suppress transparency in
any way, it's just so bizarre. You look at it,
go who's getting a raw deal here? Right?
Speaker 5: Like?
Speaker 6: Who is this not serving?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 1: But you look at the hypnotism and the magic word
hypnotism here and and Trump has become a magic word,
Orange man bad has become a magic phrase.
Speaker 5: Now usai D.
Speaker 1: You have people who never heard of USAID, And I'm
talking with people I've known for years in the East
Coast getting phone calls from people. Can you explain this
to me, Todd? How can you be against USAID? And
my question is, hey, can I pause for a second.
I looked at your Facebook, Patose, Now I'm scanning it
back to twenty twelve. You've never posted about usai D. Right,
what do you know about it.
Speaker 5: Well, I know Trump's attacking it.
Speaker 6: Yeah, do you know what to do? You know what
they do right? Right? So it's like, oh, and because
it's called U s a I D.
Speaker 7: Well, you know by that Levey the Patriot Acts the
best thing that was ever passed, and it's it's it's
holding up all over.
Speaker 5: And I should just be able to small job.
Speaker 1: I should be able to get on the phone with
my friends of these cost and go he's making America
great again.
Speaker 5: Oh oh that's okay.
Speaker 6: U s a I D.
Speaker 7: U s a I D in all practical purposes, was
a slush fund to buy favors and and and a
wield illegal influence probably in other elections.
Speaker 6: I mean that's probably the.
Speaker 5: Probably rfk Jr.
Speaker 1: Was talking about the five billion U s a I
D spent to to perform the coup in Ukraine.
Speaker 7: Right when it thoughts for supporting transdent dance outings and
all that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: So we need to talk about that because you had
a conversation with a trans radical on on the Twitter machine,
and I saw what she said. Every treat to what
she said, which she said made perfect sense. But I
want to run people through this because there's an aspect
to this, and you are a very in tune man.
You are aware, you are not at all a naive man,
Zach Abraham. But there's something I need you to know
because you you identify some evil. But I want to
run you through the rest of the evil that you
don't see on this as it relates to Jenner Jackers.
We do with Zach Abraham, Chief and Vestment Officer Bulwark
Capital Management.
Speaker 5: And I will do this. Can we get you can't
do close ups? Can you can? I just lean way
in and.
Speaker 1: Show people this horrible scar that it gave myself. Now,
this is what I get for going to a temple
of stink and flesh and tanning like all ego, etc.
I like the way I look tan better, Okay, sue me.
And it's a vitamin D booth, so it's produces. It's
like sunshine. You stand up on this thing anyway, that's
my defense. So I got this nick up here. Everybody
knows what to do. Stop the bleeding, cleanse it done.
That be embarrassed for about ten days while this thing
sits there and I've got a third eye. Oh I'm embarrassed. Okay,
I get to be embarrassed. Everybody knows what very few
people know what to do when you lack regularity. So
what does that mean. Let's not get gross. It means
that you can't, you know, go number two, So you
get all bloated, and then your belt doesn't fit, and
then you're thinking you're getting fat, and then pants don't fit,
and then you can't sleep, and so then you can't
you know, number two.
Speaker 5: So you could go buy pharma, don't take care of that.
Speaker 1: You could go get a coffee etema and we have
one here over in the corner. Or you could just
take this P three am from boptimizers dot com slash tod.
Add to that mass simes, get all the protein you
can rather all the amino acids produced in your body,
possible two thousand times the amount of amino acids. Combine
that with P three AM, and I don't think you're
gonna have any problem with regularity. You're gonna digest your
food better, which gets you more nutrition and more sleep.
Speaker 5: It's that easy.
Speaker 1: You go to boptimizers dot com slash tod use code
tod to get ten percent off all their products. Do
subscribe to the products you need because you never run
out of product. But then they also do this, they
give you exclusive discounts, exclusive gifts, and exclusive information packs
and how to optimize your body, often not even using
Boptimizer's gifts Bobtimized com slash Todd. So let's run through
this conversation you had online. This this, you do the replay,
and then I'm going to fill in the pieces since
I've been burdened with having to study the gender cult
for a decade.
Speaker 6: Well, I mean, I think we all know how.
Speaker 7: Just yeah, I don't want to use the word ridiculous
because it's so in my it's there's it's evil. It's
such an evil underpinning to it, right, But I mean
the logic behind it is just mindnumbingly stupid.
Speaker 6: But they were going out.
Speaker 7: I think it was centered around this Washington State politician
who recently came out and said, if you're old enough
to be pregnant, you're old enough to make all of
your own medical decisions.
Speaker 5: Yep, Jamie Peterson, Seattle.
Speaker 1: And by the way, in Seattle, that's not even a
radical statement because you know people in Seattle going thirteen?
Speaker 5: What what about the nine year olds?
Speaker 4: Right?
Speaker 7: And you and I have said this for years, and
I think we used to get a lot of a
lot of weird looks. But underpinning this to me has
always I think that this whole movement was easier to
see coming, and it was easier to understand the vectors
of attack that they were taking on pushing this ideology
if you came into it with the with the framework
of this is a push toward normalizing pedophilia. If you
looked at it from that angle, it made a lot
of sense, right, and you can see the natural progression
to it.
Speaker 6: But I was getting in.
Speaker 7: I was getting in this back and forth with somebody,
and they were they were trying to defend these sex
change operations, and they kept trying to flip the narrative
over to puberty blockers, And I said, why are you
just focusing on one part of that bill, and it's
the least pernicious part.
Speaker 6: That bill also simultaneously gives the state the right to
seize the child, give them permanent medical sterilization quote unquote,
gender affirming care, pay for it all without parental consent.
Why are we talking about parents picking beta blockers or
puberty blockers. Excuse me, that's that is the most Now
we could have a whole discussion on that as well. Right,
I'm not at all.
Speaker 7: Saying I excuse that or I'm fine with people, But
I'm just saying, isn't it interesting how you're trying to
say you're having a good faith debate, but you only
want to talk about ten or fifteen percent of that bill,
which happens to be the least controversial part.
Speaker 6: Why don't we talk about it entirety?
Speaker 7: Right, didn't want to do that, And she goes, well,
how do you explain breast reductions? She goes, you know,
in a world where underage kids can have bast reduction reductions,
that's discrimination to kids that are trans And I said,
hold on a second. So partial breast reductions, which help
girls compete better in athletics, blow back pain, all these
kinds of things. You're equating that, so the improvement of
their physical life, self esteem, athletic, but you're comparing that
to permanent medical sterilization. Yes, that's literally like saying, how
is getting a knee brace any different than a knee replacement?
Speaker 1: Or or if no, let's go the full let's go
the full Measures Act. There's a condition called body integrity
disorders REGULARI it's recognized in the DMS five, the Diagnostics
Statistical ds M five Diagnostic Statistical Manual five.
Speaker 5: It's called body integrity disorder.
Speaker 1: This is where people believe they were born in the
wrong body because they were either born to be paralyzed
and they're not, so they want to be paralyzed.
Speaker 5: They want to have limbs removed.
Speaker 1: Most commonly it's I think the left leg, but below
the knee they want it removed. So you would be
comparing having a wearing a knee brace for a little
while to having a healthy leg cut off right And
to answer your question, yes, she's making that. This is
you were arguing with the person who calls themselves maryan librarian.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 5: On Twitter.
Speaker 1: She also contends that you probably supported conversion therapy for
gay people too, so you might have supported someone who says,
you know what, I don't want this same sex attraction.
I think this is ungodly. Can I talk to someone
about it? And at this might say sure, let's like
how that happen?
Speaker 6: But once look, I I just I can't stand it.
I have to step I have to always whenever I
cross paths with this, I've got to stomp it out,
which is this the battle of non sequiturs, right, Like,
I'm not going to allow you to obfuscate the whole
point of this conversation by throwing a complete non sequitur
in like you just did so.
Speaker 1: Right, But she's doing this on purpose because she equates
she equates you blocking the mutilation of bodies to you
not letting kids talk about their feelings.
Speaker 7: Yeah, when, when, and and all I would respond to
her and say it I believe I did in some capacity,
was when did the state ever mandate or force gender
or or or conversion therapy?
Speaker 6: When? When was there ever a law that said we
will sponsor gender or or or excuse me, you know.
Speaker 1: Whatever, that therapy conversion.
Speaker 6: Therapy without parental consent, and do it with public funds.
When was that ever? When was that ever passed? And
why are we talking about it?
Speaker 1: The only reason I discussed is that I had a
friend of mine who was molested by an older by
an older teen. He was a young teen. This guy
was legally an adult, and hey, it felt good. Sex
feels good.
Speaker 5: So my friend thought, well, that's it.
Speaker 1: I'm same sex attracted and he'd never been before, and
so he went to therapy and a therapist spent like
two sessions with him and goes, dude, it felt good.
Speaker 5: Like, do you find yourself walking around looking at men
thinking they're pretty?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 5: Do you find yourself wanted to kiss men?
Speaker 6: Oh?
Speaker 5: Gosh no?
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Guess what, You're not same sex attracted. This guy did
this to you. You were a kid, You were confused
and sexual contact feels good and he oh, okay, all right,
so then it's okay that that happens. No, it's not
because he abused you. It's not okay, and it doesn't
mean you're same sex attracted. And it helped my friend
figure this out. Now let's get to the topic at hand.
So this technique she uses with you is she comes
along and says, and this is unquoting from your Twitter,
why is it okay to get breast reduction surgery as
a teen boy or girl as long as you're not
so called trance a discrimination? Masculinizing surgery doesn't involve removing
the clitterus.
Speaker 5: It's also extremely rare and more rare in teens.
Speaker 1: So much to get into details here, but let me
do this in just a second, Zac, because this is
you are onto something that you wouldn't even even know
how close you are on something. Okay, we're talking about bodies.
I want to talk about yours real quick.
Speaker 5: Please don't go get gender reinsignment surgery because you have inflammation.
Speaker 1: Stop, don't, don't, please, do not get your genitarior remove
because youve got inflammation. Instead, use native path krill, which
is in fact it is twice as absorbable as fish
based omega threes. So and look, guys, I'm basically a pescatarian.
I shouldn't need this stuff if that worked, but it
doesn't because it's not that absorbable.
Speaker 5: So I use native pathcrill.
Speaker 1: It comes from seventy three miles off the Antarctic coast,
the purest and cleanest waters in.
Speaker 5: The world world.
Speaker 1: It is more potent for helping your immune system than
vitamin C because of the potency of these three omegas.
And for as little as nineteen dollars per bottle, you
can toss every ounce of hyberprofen out of your house,
which is a big pharma b It actually creates inflammation
even if you take a bunch of it. The more
you take, the more you get. The opposite is true
with native pathcrill.
Speaker 5: It fights it. It boosts your immune system, it boosts
blood flow, it boosts metabolism and memory. So go help
your own health today. Get to Native Pathcrill.
Speaker 1: Boost your health by going to Native Pathcrill's website. It's
getcrill dot com slash todd. That's get krill kr ill
dot com slash todd. To see what deals are waiting
for you. That's getkrill dot com slash todd.
Speaker 5: So Zach.
Speaker 1: Back in the day when I started to get all
the reports of these families whose kids were getting gender
jacked and children's hospital was coming in and threatening to
steal the kids, and CPS reports and all that, I
learned that there was some very friendly autogidophiliac men who
are sexually aroused by pretending to be women and forcing
other people or conning them into believing. You know what
they did with their spare time. They bought ads online,
and they bought banner ads, and they targeted teen girls,
and they targeted them on Reddit and I can't remember
that blogging platform, which was pure unadulterated hell. And you
know what twent Alex, Yeah yeah, Tumbler, Tumblr, Tumblr, yeah yeah.
They bought ads and those ads were pictures of a
girl looking very sad with really cartoonishly large breasts, and
the ads said things like, sick of your sad sacks?
Are you sure you're born in the right body? And
when kids clicked on these ads, they were met with
the opportunity to chat with someone who is a gender expert,
and they would get an email and they would get
an opportunity to be involved in a group chat, or
a man who was dressed as a woman would tell
them you're probably born in the wrong body. And you
know what the test was, do you like your breasts? No,
well then you're a boy, of course. So they sent
them a script. The script began with, you need to
start displaying the following symptoms around your family. You need
to stop the daily activities you've been in. You need
to change friend groups. You need to start wearing dark clothing.
You start putting on really dark makeup and big sweatshirts.
You need to be sullen all the time and tell
your parents display worry. And when your parents keep saying, hey,
talk to us, what's going on, don't and then wait
till a good time and set the weakest parent down. Hey,
the parent who's likely to give you what you want.
Guess what the script is. If you're a girl, I'm
in the wrong body.
Speaker 5: You know, starts to say, Dad, let me ask you
a question.
Speaker 1: If my breast were really hurting me, like for sports,
and it was really hurting my back and just like
I was getting a bunch of back pain and arm
pain and stuff, would you possibly ever consider talking to
a doctor about like a breast reduction?
Speaker 6: Geez?
Speaker 1: And the insidious thing is this You get a yeah,
well sure, honey, I mean if a doctor said that, yeah,
I mean obviously I'd talked to him a health professional, Okay,
so you'd.
Speaker 5: Be open to that. They cracked the door.
Speaker 1: And a few weeks later they come in and go,
you know what, my breast really hurt me. I need
to see a doctor. I'm in my back and can
I just talk to doctor? And the kids know they've
already done the research, they know the language you speak
to the docs, and then the doctor is going to say,
in conjunction with the kid, well this is really just
another form of breast reduction. And you'd already talk to
your daughter and said you would consider a breast reduction.
This is basically the same thing. We're just removing more tissue,
and believe it or not, there are parents who listen
to that and they don't understand or they don't stop.
Think they're so terrified because this comes along with your
daughter's going to kill themselves if you do it right.
And they're forgetting the fact that those are organs. Those
aren't sacks of meat or sacks of fat.
Speaker 5: Those are organs.
Speaker 1: They're responsible for passing on immunities to children. They have
the miraculous ability to feed children. They contribute to the
health of the woman, or moving breast can contribute to
other forms of cancer. So, Zach, what you're encountering is
a woman using a script on you, or I don't
know if it's a woman, but someone you know on
Twitter using a script on you that works with terrified
parents and confused teens. And we have judges saying to
the Trump administration, you have to put the gender ideology
stuff back on your websites.
Speaker 5: I know, it's unspeakable evil, unspeakable evil.
Speaker 6: And you've got to put it back. Like what do
you know what law they're invoking or what gives him
the right? Is that just an injunction, it's just a
temporary stall. Is what that is.
Speaker 1: Yeah, most of these things are being done ex partey,
so the Trump administration doesn't get a chance to respond.
It's a ruling to stall the activity based upon an
activist lawsuit. In the case of the judge who said
that that that that they couldn't go out and make
these spending cuts. He actually said, there are people who
claim that the Treasury secretary is a figurehead, therefore it
doesn't have any real power.
Speaker 5: Therefore we're not going to let him cut these budgets.
Speaker 1: He actually said that that that's that's part.
Speaker 5: Of his legal theory. In another judge and this is
the case.
Speaker 7: Hold on, no on did the judge argued because Trump
said the Treasury secretary theory.
Speaker 1: It leftist activists who sued said Sam Bessant is a
figure out. He's not really in power. Elon Musk or
someone's else is in power. Therefore he shouldn't be able
to look at the financial data. And this went into
the decision in the lawsuit. Well, he's a figurehead and
therefore can't look at the data.
Speaker 6: The Treasury wouldn't be in charge. The Treasury just pays
the bills.
Speaker 7: That's like it's that's like saying the Bank of America
decides where your money goes every month.
Speaker 1: That's ridiculous, I know. And but none of this makes sense.
Then you have this that the judge is. This guy's
name is John Bates, who ordered the government to restore
the sex the so called sex change and gender ideology websites.
His wife, Carol Rees, is a founder of Hope for
Children in Ethiopia, a long term recipient of us AI D.
Speaker 5: Right right, you also, but.
Speaker 7: You know, I didn't call me naive, but but the
amount of people that will line up gladly and then
defend it, the ability to get ill gotten gains is
it's just shocking to me. It just the amount of
and it's nothing new, obviously, it's as old as human
but the amount of people that will gladly, uncourced just
hand over their integrity for a check, it just it
never ceases to amaze me. I just said, I'm like, yeah,
but you got to look yourself in the mirror, man,
right and now as long as we've got the Gucci
bag and the new Rolls Royce or whatever it is,
they're like that, that's morality.
Speaker 4: We know.
Speaker 1: And on judgment day, and we talk about this often
and I know I'm going to be judged, and we
all are. Everybody's going to be judged. You don't have
to like that, but that's a fact. Your nee will bow,
your tongue will confess. I can see these people going back.
I went to church, and I took my kids to church,
and I could see Jesus going, right, you did, and
then you mutilated my kids and you lied about it,
and you stole money and you lied about it, and
you never repented that. I never knew you, because if
you knew me, you wouldn't have been doing these things.
Speaker 5: And the Holy Spirit would have convicted you. And guess what.
Speaker 1: Look, guys, And I could see Jesus saying, guys, you
had cruises and trips and Gucci bags and look I'll
show you.
Speaker 6: Look.
Speaker 5: Remember those homes you had. I'll let you see them again.
See all that. Hey, you had your reward.
Speaker 6: Yeah, now you.
Speaker 5: Get to have eternity in hell.
Speaker 1: But you had your reward, and you're gonna have eternity
to remember when you didn't live in constant agony.
Speaker 5: Right, Man, I'm the funboard, I guess, aren't I.
Speaker 6: Well, No, The other.
Speaker 7: Thing too, I think about is like Mary in the library,
and here how many of these people are just indoctrinated, right,
Like how many of them just believe it because they've
been pumped? How many of them are active participants? Like
that's that's the other part, Like do you know because
my assumption on the face of it is that the
usually this is the case right where the majority of
supporters are just useful idiots, Right, they don't understand the
mantle they're they're they're carrying with this one. In this case,
what do you think that percentage is because it's.
Speaker 6: Pretty it's a pretty ridiculous thing to support.
Speaker 1: I mean, I just so here's here's what this is.
My theory is, and I've shared this before the Evil Sandwich.
There are about fifteen percent of people at the top
of things who are in the grift.
Speaker 5: They're getting paid.
Speaker 1: There's people who understand the gender madness is nonsense, but
they're taking the money. And you had the woman, the
fake woman, Rachel Levin, the man who pretends to be
a woman, who was second in charge of HHS.
Speaker 5: He was always bragging about the money.
Speaker 1: Now he got it done to himself, so maybe he's
one of the true believers. But about fifteen percent of
the people at the top, and I think that a good.
In the federal government, I'm gonna guess a good thirty
percent of people in the federal governments are know nothings,
and they're putting jobs on purpose, and you have purposeful
slowdowns like where they store. We'd even talked about this,
how you have to retire a federal worker and it's
limited by how fast an elevator can go up and down.
Speaker 5: You have plans inserted obsolescence.
Speaker 1: So there's about thirty percent of the people they're putting
these jobs because they're there, no nothings, do nothings, and
they clog up systems. And then right in the middle
you probably have a good I don't know, fifty percent,
maybe even yeah, fifty percent of federal employees.
Speaker 5: Good what are we doing?
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Yeah, none of this makes any sense, and yet they
get to do some good. Like they work at the
Social Security office and someone comes in, I'm not getting
my check, and that person looks because, oh my gosh,
we've got the wrong address for you, and let me
get this taken care of. And you know what, let
me talk to my supervisor. I can probably get you
four or five checks right now.
Speaker 5: Could that help. Could I do that?
Speaker 1: And they leave their job at the end of the day.
Go let me tell you about this old man came in.
He was really sad and he didn't get his check
and he was desperate. My supervisor let me override some systems.
He left with like five checks. He was super happy.
And you can see their family going, you know, you know,
you do good. Does that sound reasonable to you?
Speaker 5: Yeah?
Speaker 7: Yeah, no, And I and I think that that makes iint,
that makes all the sense in the world. It is
just it is so hard as a father of kids
to sit to encount this and that back and forth
exchange that I had with that, Like.
Speaker 6: It's so once, like it's so one sided.
Speaker 7: It wasn't a disagreement, like I mean, there were holes
in her argument big enough to run a truck, you know,
a semi truck through it. Like and I catch myself
and I don't say that saying, oh I want an
argument or I say that because it is just stupefying
to me that you can have an exchange like that
and that person can still leave that exchange thinking what
they're thinking, where somebody looks at them and goes your
basis and rationale for this is that creepy or excuse me.
Speaker 6: You know, young.
Speaker 7: Adults under the age of consent can get breast reductions,
and we're conflating that like that. Sure that doesn't that
dog don't hunt, not in anybody's field, right, So I
it just it.
Speaker 6: It amazes me. The lack of critical thinking, which.
Speaker 7: Is why the dumbing down of the education system is
part and parcel to this. You can't do this to
a society unless you make them stupid, right, and they
don't know how to think.
Speaker 1: Yo, This is why they insert slogans. Okay, this is
why they slogan air trans women are women. Say it
fifty thousand times in your sleep and you're gonna end
up believing it. We talk about positive affirmation, Stuart Smally,
I'm good enough, I'm kind enough.
Speaker 5: Gosh it, gosh darn it. Yeople like me and you
know what that stuff works.
Speaker 1: We're at the point of the edge, not just of insanity,
but of irreplaceable insanity. And I want to I want
to share with you, and you, brother, you call me
back from the edge so often, and I'm gonna invoke you.
I'm gonna invoke I'm gonna I'm going to I'm going
to rest upon your favor again, because I'm gonna share
with you where I think we didn't even understand the
danger of what they're willing to do to Trump, to
stop the deep state from being discovered. So I share
this with you in just a second, Zach mac kids,
and I can't let that go by without reminding you,
guys that there is a company that hires kids that.
Speaker 5: The rest of the world would have hads their lives ended.
And I need it.
Speaker 1: And this isn't to pretend it's not hyperbole. Doctors tried
to kill these babies, Alan and Ian. And when Ian
Alan was in the womb, I'm not kidding you. Doctors
went to John and his wife and said, really, honestly,
let us end that baby's life because that baby will
never amount to anything.
Speaker 5: That baby's going to be a useless eater. And John
and his wife said, no way. That's our son. We
don't care how many.
Speaker 1: Structural deficits he has. We don't care that he's going
to be on the autism spectrum. He's our little boy.
Speaker 5: We love him.
Speaker 1: He was knitted together in the womb by God Almighty,
in God's image. So Allan is now thirteen. Yes, he's
been through eighteen operations. No, he cannot speak, but he
is not stupid, far from it. It's a very bright mind.
He just can't talk, and in his bright mind he
invents fragrances of soap that are very meaningful. His brother
Ian now works there, also, not a clump of cells
a human being.
Speaker 5: Amy works there.
Speaker 1: She didn't get autism until her late teens and late
onset autism. One day she's neurotypical and it was just
about a matter of a couple of days. No longer neurotypical,
really really frightening. So that company gets her soap made
in conjunction with a family who's done this for three generations.
They refuse to have chemicals in it. They refuse to
have unnatural additives. It is one hundred percent pure. It's
made only in America. And your decision to not purchase
this soap, this is a decision to take that information
and go I prefer big companies that don't care about
my values. So do this, just try it. Just take
that pledge today. Yep, I am going to try Alan Soaps.
Go to Alan Soaps dot com slash todd you get
ten percent off there. You'll try the soap, and then
just one follow on promise. If you like the soap,
you love the company's mission, subscribe to the soap. It's
allan soaps dot com slash Todd so Zach, let's run
through a little bit of recent history together. We had
the twenty twenty election that is deeply suspect. I contend
I know it was rigged. A contend it was stolen.
Many people agree. We had the lawfare. We had the
book keeping either air or lie around Stormy Daniels that
had expired, the statute limitations blown up into like forty felonies.
We had the Goldman Sachs doesn't know how to value
real estates, but Letitia James does, and Latisha James is
apparently scamming bank companies for mortgages. We had President Trump's
Russian asset. We had President Trump as a known repeat rapist,
the Egen Carol case being a myriad problems with those cases,
with that case. Don't know who to believe there. I believe,
I happen to believe Trump. We have all of that, Zach.
He wins, he gets past two attempts to kill him,
both of which are deeply suspect. Deeply suspect, he wins.
Now we have judges coming and saying we recognize all
of those factors, Hermann. But right now the bureaucracy can't
protect itself. Trump has the Congress, he's got the Senate.
Speaker 5: So we one person in Rhode Island whose job.
Speaker 1: Is just to be a judge is going to reach
into the executive branch and say to the American people,
your vote doesn't mean right, shinola, right right. Something tells
me that might be dangerous.
Speaker 7: Well, look, it is dangerous. And this goes back to
what you and I have always like.
Speaker 6: One of the biggest things that frustrates to me the
most with these progressives is they are the party of
cutting off your nose despite your face. Meaning they're so little.
Speaker 7: I mean, obviously, I don't think the Socratic method was
like top on, you know, in their educational priorities. As
far as the way these people, I mean, they don't
know how to think, right. But you sit there and
you go you're literally constructing your own prison here. This
is again you're usurping the democratic process. This is by
definition unconstitutional what you are doing. The executive branch as
selected and voted in by a majority of Americans and
the electoral College. He has precisely these powers. This is
exactly what we give him the power to do. And
you are unconstitutionally you surping that power.
Speaker 6: And look, this is why. And I think that I
think that this hammer should be swung judiciously, and I
think it should be swung cautiously, but it needs to
get swung. Nonetheless, people need to go to jail.
Speaker 5: People need to go to jail, and judges need to
be impeached.
Speaker 7: Yes, this has gotten out of control, right, and legislators
and judges are starting to represent Black Lives Matter activists
right in downtown cities.
Speaker 6: People need to go to jail. Law and order must
be preserved by And I don't care what joy Behar
or what Goldberg say on the view. I don't care
how just these people think their cause is right. There
is fascism and there is anti law going on, and
it's all on that side.
Speaker 5: Yes, And here's not obstruction.
Speaker 6: It's not even obstruction. We're past obstruction.
Speaker 1: And this is yes, and love what you said, well said.
And this is what I would say to these judges
right now. President Trump is abiding by your ruling.
Speaker 5: He said that.
Speaker 1: Seventy percent of Americans say he's keeping his promise. He
is a fifty three percent approval rate. Joe Biden bragged
about not following the Stink and Supreme Court three times
on student loan debt.
Speaker 5: He bragged about it.
Speaker 1: Okay, if President Trump were to give a speech and
explain this very well, very simply, I am the chief executive.
Speaker 5: You elected me to run the executive branch. Here's an order.
Speaker 1: Chart of the executive branch. Each of these bureaucracies is
in the executive branch. The CDC was given whatever thirty
two billion dollar budget. They get to decide how to
spend it. HM, that person works for me. I signed
in an executive order. We're not doing the gender madness thing.
That's not happening. Therefore, we took down the websites because
guess what, it's not real.
Speaker 5: Boys aren't girls.
Speaker 6: Yeah, And legally speaking, the other thing that infuriates me
about this judge is ruling is that the bureaucrats bring
in this case and that judge they have no legal standing.
They don't get to make that call. It doesn't exist
right right.
Speaker 1: If President Trump carried out that speech with the order
trap behind him, and turned to the American people and said,
you'd like to be to do this.
Speaker 5: I've thought a lot about this, I prayed about it.
I'm not going to follow what the judges say. No,
I'm not doing it. We're not taking it down. It's
going to go to the Supreme Court. But I'm not
going to stop. Well, what percentage of people?
Speaker 1: Here's what I want to say, this is, do you
understand what happens when sixty percent of Americans say sweet
and he doesn't do it?
Speaker 5: There was that whole thing.
Speaker 1: What was the president who said the the courts have
made the ruling, now make him.
Speaker 5: Now, let's semen force it?
Speaker 6: Yeah right, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1: Okay if he does that and ignores the ruling and
nothing happens to him, and sixty percent of people support that,
because guess what, seventy percent of people don't think boys
should compete against girls and men against women. Right, your
courts are going to discover why we call it the
illusion of control. Okay, your manufactured consent is gone. Now
let me introduce you to the enemy of society called
the illusion of control.
Speaker 5: You don't have any huh. Now do you see where
that could go?
Speaker 7: Yeoh, it's it's yeah, yeah, and it's you know, it's
the same as what was this lady's name. She's the
latest of a you know, the litany whacked out progressives
on mainstream media.
Speaker 6: But she's on there.
Speaker 7: She's on there talking about this is the constitutional crisis,
and you're like, got, what since when did a president
coming in appointing an independent board to go review government
spending public documents? By the way, right, this is this
is public stuff. That is that they're just taking the time.
I'm sitting there going.
Speaker 6: Guys, what is the allegation?
Speaker 7: I hear all of this, you know, hyperbole and just
not what is the allegation?
Speaker 6: You keep saying constitutional? What's being violent? What's being violent?
Speaker 8: You had Anna Presley say Elon Musk, who's a Nazi,
has his grubby hands all over Mema and Grandma's social
Security numbers?
Speaker 1: Right, because Elon's going, oh, that's where the money is.
I'm gonna start having those checks mailed to me.
Speaker 6: And it is right.
Speaker 5: I could you know what I could net out of
this thing?
Speaker 1: Twicey grand a month, or you could take the earned
interest that you carried.
Speaker 5: They carried interest in six seconds?
Speaker 7: How hold on won't mema, Noah for social Security?
Speaker 6: Come comes up a little short? How are they?
Speaker 3: What?
Speaker 6: What like?
Speaker 5: Again?
Speaker 6: I just want to know, tell me the worst case scenario.
What are we looking at here? Right? Well, it's all
public information anyway. Then what are you so upset?
Speaker 7: What are you like? This is what we call Trump
derangement syndrome. That's what it is like, right like that?
Speaker 5: Sadly it is.
Speaker 6: It's just it just amazes me, sadly.
Speaker 5: So the new studio looks great, you sound great. And
let me be.
Speaker 1: The one again to apologize for the gaping gash in
my forehead. And I hope the bleeding wasn't super distracting.
I'll try not to be bleeding next time I see you.
Speaker 4: Good.
Speaker 6: Well, yeah, I'm just glad.
Speaker 7: I thought maybe you were tangling with you know, somebody
at the opposition.
Speaker 6: I thought, you know, maybe i'll.
Speaker 1: Think of a good story by the time I get home.
It'll be a couple of Antifa attacked me. And but
they're they're going after a baby first. And there was
a dog involved, vicious pit bull.
Speaker 5: That's what got me. It was a fang from the
pit bull. And so but I'm okay, and I just know, oh,
You're a warrior, you know. Thank you, brother. Always great
to have wise counsel from you.
Speaker 6: Gotta go with you you too, man, Thanks for having me.
Speaker 5: This is a Todd Herbert show. Remember God is a
god of order, not chaos. Please go, be well, be strong,
be kinds, and please make every effort to walk in
the ordered light of Christ.