WEBVTT

1
00:00:05.120 --> 00:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh geez, folks, it's showtime.

2
00:00:08.640 --> 00:00:11.279
<v Speaker 2>People say, good mind to see this movie. When they

3
00:00:11.320 --> 00:00:12.160
<v Speaker 2>go out to a theater.

4
00:00:12.439 --> 00:00:16.199
<v Speaker 1>They want closed sodas, hot popcorn in. No monsters in

5
00:00:16.239 --> 00:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Projection.

6
00:00:16.920 --> 00:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Booth, Everyone for tend podcasting isn't boring. Got it off? Hey, folks,

7
00:00:40.600 --> 00:00:42.679
<v Speaker 2>welcome to a special episode of The Projection Booth. I'm

8
00:00:42.679 --> 00:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>your host Mike White. On this episode, it is the

9
00:00:45.200 --> 00:00:48.439
<v Speaker 2>return of Mark Edlet's. As I said during our interview,

10
00:00:48.520 --> 00:00:51.479
<v Speaker 2>the last time we spoke was right around the beginning

11
00:00:51.560 --> 00:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>of the pandemic. I was on vacation right before that

12
00:00:56.039 --> 00:00:58.719
<v Speaker 2>started and reading one of his James Bond books. You

13
00:00:58.719 --> 00:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>can hear that in the feed, and you can also

14
00:01:01.359 --> 00:01:03.520
<v Speaker 2>hear us talk about one of his later books right

15
00:01:03.600 --> 00:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>now as we discuss movies go forth. It is a

16
00:01:07.280 --> 00:01:11.519
<v Speaker 2>fascinating concept where he's gone through a lot of series

17
00:01:11.599 --> 00:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>and looked at fourth films as well as fourth films

18
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:17.439
<v Speaker 2>that never happened and some fourth films that happened in

19
00:01:17.599 --> 00:01:21.120
<v Speaker 2>very odd circumstances. Had a great time talking with Mark,

20
00:01:21.239 --> 00:01:23.439
<v Speaker 2>looking forward to having him back on the show. I

21
00:01:23.480 --> 00:01:26.560
<v Speaker 2>hope you enjoyed this interview Mark Edletz. It is so

22
00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:29.439
<v Speaker 2>great talking with you again, because the last time we spoke,

23
00:01:29.480 --> 00:01:32.439
<v Speaker 2>I think it was before the pandemic, So it has

24
00:01:32.519 --> 00:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>been a little while, sir.

25
00:01:33.519 --> 00:01:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, it's been that long. Because I listened

26
00:01:35.799 --> 00:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to you all the time, I didn't necessarily notice the

27
00:01:38.640 --> 00:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>absence because I'm with you weekly. But I'm glad to

28
00:01:43.319 --> 00:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>be back in a different way.

29
00:01:45.159 --> 00:01:48.519
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about Movies go Forth. First off, we should

30
00:01:48.519 --> 00:01:50.439
<v Speaker 2>probably talk a little bit about the concept for it,

31
00:01:50.480 --> 00:01:52.879
<v Speaker 2>but I really want to know how you got the concept,

32
00:01:53.159 --> 00:01:56.359
<v Speaker 2>what burst of inspiration hits you to say I'm going

33
00:01:56.439 --> 00:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>to make this book.

34
00:01:58.120 --> 00:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>The book is called Movies Go Forth. Fourth films in

35
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:07.159
<v Speaker 1>fantastic franchises, and I look at the fourth film in

36
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:11.719
<v Speaker 1>popular movie series, to the fourth James Bond, the fourth

37
00:02:11.800 --> 00:02:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars, the fourth Batman, Superman, Jaws, Halloween, on and on.

38
00:02:17.879 --> 00:02:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I went for all the big franchises that I could

39
00:02:19.919 --> 00:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think of that I could get a primary interview with

40
00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:27.319
<v Speaker 1>a filmmaker, with a director or writer, casiquin actor, But

41
00:02:27.439 --> 00:02:31.879
<v Speaker 1>mostly my interest is in directors and writers. And I

42
00:02:31.919 --> 00:02:35.319
<v Speaker 1>grant you it's a weird concept for a book. Nobody

43
00:02:35.400 --> 00:02:39.159
<v Speaker 1>was asking for a book on fourth films. My family

44
00:02:39.599 --> 00:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>challenged my sanity in doing this, but it seemed like

45
00:02:42.840 --> 00:02:46.479
<v Speaker 1>a good idea at the time. And I'll try to

46
00:02:46.520 --> 00:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you or honest with myself about how

47
00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the idea came about, but I'm not one hundred percent sure.

48
00:02:53.520 --> 00:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>But what I think happened is that I'm obsessed to

49
00:02:56.879 --> 00:03:02.199
<v Speaker 1>fourth films. They are Superman four, Quest for Piece, Batman four, Batman,

50
00:03:02.280 --> 00:03:07.599
<v Speaker 1>and Robin Joel Schumacher's film Enjoys the Revenge or Joys for.

51
00:03:07.800 --> 00:03:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Depending on and you slice it.

52
00:03:10.319 --> 00:03:14.159
<v Speaker 1>When you look at lists of the worst films of

53
00:03:14.199 --> 00:03:20.039
<v Speaker 1>all time, those three films are always on it. Superman, Batman, Jaws.

54
00:03:20.280 --> 00:03:23.199
<v Speaker 1>And I am so fascinated by these films that I

55
00:03:23.240 --> 00:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>think I backed up into the premise of the book

56
00:03:27.080 --> 00:03:31.879
<v Speaker 1>by noticing that observation each kind of franchise is a

57
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:35.039
<v Speaker 1>case study where I'd pick a horror film, or action

58
00:03:35.199 --> 00:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>film or a comedy film. But then once I interviewed

59
00:03:38.840 --> 00:03:42.719
<v Speaker 1>someone from Halloween four, then I thought Jason for Then

60
00:03:42.759 --> 00:03:49.039
<v Speaker 1>I thought Freddy four, so then Psycho four. So I

61
00:03:49.080 --> 00:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't keep that kernel of each film is a case

62
00:03:51.960 --> 00:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>site for a specific genre. Just because I was curious

63
00:03:55.240 --> 00:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about these other films. I think that's what got me

64
00:03:58.400 --> 00:03:58.879
<v Speaker 1>into it.

65
00:03:59.599 --> 00:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>If my listeners are like me, their minds are reeling

66
00:04:03.039 --> 00:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>right now, because that's when I first got your book.

67
00:04:06.159 --> 00:04:08.719
<v Speaker 2>I was like flipping through the intro and I'm just like,

68
00:04:09.599 --> 00:04:13.159
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, the fourth film. And I just had

69
00:04:13.159 --> 00:04:16.439
<v Speaker 2>this huge flood of all of these fourth films that

70
00:04:16.839 --> 00:04:19.279
<v Speaker 2>have been around for many years or some are still

71
00:04:19.439 --> 00:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>just popping up. It feels like only yesterday we had

72
00:04:22.079 --> 00:04:25.839
<v Speaker 2>Scream four, but now we're up to what seven saw

73
00:04:26.079 --> 00:04:29.879
<v Speaker 2>four was probably a decade ago. There are franchises out

74
00:04:29.920 --> 00:04:32.920
<v Speaker 2>there that are still just pumping them out, and some

75
00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:35.560
<v Speaker 2>of them have been it's a tough road to get

76
00:04:35.600 --> 00:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>to that fourth film, and not a lot of them

77
00:04:38.519 --> 00:04:41.279
<v Speaker 2>actually happened. I think you talk about some that weren't

78
00:04:41.279 --> 00:04:43.759
<v Speaker 2>even made but were in the works, like a Spider

79
00:04:43.800 --> 00:04:44.959
<v Speaker 2>Man for from Sam Raimi.

80
00:04:45.279 --> 00:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Yet that's a bonus chapter, and I'm so proud of

81
00:04:49.600 --> 00:04:53.959
<v Speaker 1>that chapter because I was a big Sam Raimi Spider

82
00:04:54.040 --> 00:04:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Man fan. I thought he did a great job, and

83
00:04:56.959 --> 00:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>he didn't seem to love his own work on Spider

84
00:04:59.759 --> 00:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Man three from He felt forced into it, he said,

85
00:05:05.160 --> 00:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted to end the series on his own terms.

86
00:05:09.199 --> 00:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>And there's been a lot of rumors about what the

87
00:05:11.319 --> 00:05:13.439
<v Speaker 1>plot would have been, who the actors would have been

88
00:05:13.680 --> 00:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>with the villains would have been, and it was never

89
00:05:17.399 --> 00:05:22.439
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent set in stone. But through the interview

90
00:05:22.519 --> 00:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>that I conducted, we know a lot about the casting

91
00:05:25.319 --> 00:05:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and the plot and the arc of the character. And

92
00:05:28.839 --> 00:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>what I thought was interesting about Spider Man four is

93
00:05:32.360 --> 00:05:35.639
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Raimi wanted to create an ending. He said,

94
00:05:35.839 --> 00:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you're going to reboot this. I don't pretend

95
00:05:37.800 --> 00:05:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that this is the end of Spider Man, nor do

96
00:05:39.439 --> 00:05:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I want it to be the end of Spider Man.

97
00:05:41.000 --> 00:05:43.399
<v Speaker 1>But wouldn't it be cool cool if I did my

98
00:05:43.800 --> 00:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>version of the end of a Spider Man series and

99
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:50.279
<v Speaker 1>put out on a high note. And they were far

100
00:05:50.279 --> 00:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>along in the process before everything got pulled and went

101
00:05:54.079 --> 00:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>back to Andrew Garfield. And the thing about all these

102
00:05:56.959 --> 00:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>series is a trilogy used to be the sign of

103
00:06:00.759 --> 00:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>success when I was growing up. You think of the

104
00:06:03.839 --> 00:06:06.519
<v Speaker 1>Indiana Joe and trilogy, you think of the Star Wars trilogy,

105
00:06:06.800 --> 00:06:10.079
<v Speaker 1>and a trilogy is, of course a perfect storytelling structure

106
00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>or format. Beginning, middle and end. You introduce the character

107
00:06:13.839 --> 00:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as they get into problems, they resolve the problems. Act one,

108
00:06:16.759 --> 00:06:21.959
<v Speaker 1>two and three, the exploration of the book is what

109
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:25.399
<v Speaker 1>do you do when the story is over and either

110
00:06:25.439 --> 00:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the filmmakers or the studio want to continue with the series.

111
00:06:30.879 --> 00:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>How does that impact the series? How does that impact

112
00:06:33.639 --> 00:06:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the characters? How does that impact your fans love for

113
00:06:37.519 --> 00:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>these characters? What is too much? What is not enough? Halloween?

114
00:06:42.600 --> 00:06:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Write the thirteenth, We go on and on. The Psycho

115
00:06:46.839 --> 00:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>ended the series with four as it was meant to.

116
00:06:50.120 --> 00:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Jaws was not meant to end the series on four,

117
00:06:52.680 --> 00:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was so reviled that they had to stop.

118
00:06:57.160 --> 00:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that Spielberg's experience on Jaws, seeing his

119
00:07:03.480 --> 00:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>classic brilliant film get the synder each series was a

120
00:07:08.800 --> 00:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit worse. I think that is why he was

121
00:07:11.959 --> 00:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>so involved with the Jurassic Park films, and then the

122
00:07:14.839 --> 00:07:17.879
<v Speaker 1>fourth Jurassic Park film was the most successful of all time.

123
00:07:18.279 --> 00:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>But the thing about Jaws which is fascinating is because

124
00:07:22.480 --> 00:07:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to an actor on that Lance Guest who

125
00:07:25.360 --> 00:07:28.199
<v Speaker 1>was in the Last Star Feet Fighter, and he said,

126
00:07:28.319 --> 00:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>as the director that they sincerely believed that they were

127
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:39.399
<v Speaker 1>making the best version of the premise of a shark

128
00:07:39.519 --> 00:07:43.759
<v Speaker 1>getting revenge on another shark for another family, Which doesn't

129
00:07:43.759 --> 00:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>make sense because this shark is not getting revenge. The

130
00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:49.759
<v Speaker 1>other shark was dead. But they bought the premise. They

131
00:07:49.800 --> 00:07:54.519
<v Speaker 1>thought they were making a thoughtful film. And I don't

132
00:07:54.519 --> 00:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>write about films that I don't have an affection for,

133
00:07:57.839 --> 00:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't take potshots at any of these. I

134
00:08:00.480 --> 00:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>write about them all with love, and when I speak

135
00:08:02.879 --> 00:08:05.959
<v Speaker 1>to the filmmakers, I'm doing it with you know, my

136
00:08:06.120 --> 00:08:09.759
<v Speaker 1>love for their movies in the way that I love them.

137
00:08:10.480 --> 00:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But however, I do know that Jaws for is objectively

138
00:08:13.040 --> 00:08:17.079
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. But when you look at Superman four on paper,

139
00:08:17.360 --> 00:08:23.199
<v Speaker 1>it's a home run. Superman three was not good, even

140
00:08:23.199 --> 00:08:24.759
<v Speaker 1>when I first thought as a kid, I knew that

141
00:08:24.879 --> 00:08:27.839
<v Speaker 1>wasn't good. But it's strong because of Christopher Reeve and

142
00:08:27.879 --> 00:08:31.399
<v Speaker 1>anything he's in, he's quite good. Superman four was an attempt,

143
00:08:31.519 --> 00:08:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a deliberate attempt to go back to the foundation of

144
00:08:34.399 --> 00:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Superman one. Superman the movie. They went to Donner and

145
00:08:37.360 --> 00:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>they went to Manquets and they said can you come back?

146
00:08:40.000 --> 00:08:42.159
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, no, we're good, thank you very much.

147
00:08:42.639 --> 00:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But the writers and the director who took a crack

148
00:08:45.919 --> 00:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at it, Sidney J. Fury, is the director who is

149
00:08:49.000 --> 00:08:51.759
<v Speaker 1>a good director. They do a serious film. They do

150
00:08:52.440 --> 00:08:55.279
<v Speaker 1>take the elements that we loved about Superman one and

151
00:08:55.360 --> 00:08:59.399
<v Speaker 1>two and respect them and honor them. But in that case,

152
00:08:59.440 --> 00:09:01.759
<v Speaker 1>there were lots of reasons why the film fell apart,

153
00:09:02.200 --> 00:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>including at the very basic level you don't budget.

154
00:09:05.559 --> 00:09:07.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is one thing I really appreciate about the

155
00:09:07.759 --> 00:09:10.519
<v Speaker 2>book is that respect that you show these films, because

156
00:09:10.559 --> 00:09:13.200
<v Speaker 2>you could just, oh, I'm armed Forbear, I'm going to

157
00:09:13.279 --> 00:09:17.360
<v Speaker 2>go talk about Police Academy four. But yes, there is

158
00:09:17.399 --> 00:09:22.559
<v Speaker 2>a great level of respect for films that inherently I

159
00:09:22.559 --> 00:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>would say ninety percent of the time they don't get

160
00:09:25.320 --> 00:09:28.440
<v Speaker 2>respect because they're seen as being something watered down after

161
00:09:28.559 --> 00:09:32.559
<v Speaker 2>three movies. It's very rare. I mentioned a few franchises,

162
00:09:32.600 --> 00:09:34.799
<v Speaker 2>and you've mentioned a few that have gone well beyond

163
00:09:34.919 --> 00:09:38.399
<v Speaker 2>for I know that the last time we talked about

164
00:09:38.600 --> 00:09:41.960
<v Speaker 2>James Bond and that you could almost say that there

165
00:09:41.960 --> 00:09:45.000
<v Speaker 2>are many fours in that series just because of the

166
00:09:45.120 --> 00:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>different bonds that have come in, the changes in leadership,

167
00:09:48.600 --> 00:09:51.279
<v Speaker 2>the changes in direction. You can look at like the

168
00:09:51.399 --> 00:09:57.879
<v Speaker 2>John Glenn years, is QUADRILLGIY or sorry, Quintology five films there,

169
00:09:58.000 --> 00:09:59.759
<v Speaker 2>and then you can look at the fourth one of that,

170
00:10:00.000 --> 00:10:03.759
<v Speaker 2>and then you probably could get very tripped up when

171
00:10:03.759 --> 00:10:07.279
<v Speaker 2>it comes to Star Wars because the fourth is the first.

172
00:10:07.759 --> 00:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>That was my for Star Wars, which I love, and

173
00:10:10.759 --> 00:10:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Star Wars kid. I made a documentary called

174
00:10:12.960 --> 00:10:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Jedi Junkies on extreme Star Wars fans. I've read so

175
00:10:16.399 --> 00:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>much as you have on Star Wars and watch so

176
00:10:18.639 --> 00:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>many videos and documentaries and talked about it so much.

177
00:10:22.240 --> 00:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to come at it in a slightly skewed

178
00:10:25.960 --> 00:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>point of view, and so for Star Wars, I asked

179
00:10:28.480 --> 00:10:31.639
<v Speaker 1>myself that question, what is the fourth film? For me?

180
00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Is it Phantom Menace Episode one, the fourth one in

181
00:10:37.440 --> 00:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the Skywalker trilogy? Is it for some people growing up later?

182
00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it Episode four? Star Wars and New Hope? Or

183
00:10:47.240 --> 00:10:50.519
<v Speaker 1>And what I profered for this book, Movies Go for

184
00:10:51.159 --> 00:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is could it be the e Wok movie that was

185
00:10:55.519 --> 00:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>released theatrically overseas? So if you were overseas, the fourth

186
00:11:00.120 --> 00:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars film you saw in the movie theater was

187
00:11:03.240 --> 00:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the Emock movie and for that audience, that was the

188
00:11:06.679 --> 00:11:08.879
<v Speaker 1>fourth Star Wars film. So I explore that one because

189
00:11:09.360 --> 00:11:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I recognize that sort of a little bit a goofy approach,

190
00:11:12.000 --> 00:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, what are you gonna do?

191
00:11:14.240 --> 00:11:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I don't imagine because I would ask anybody else, oh,

192
00:11:18.440 --> 00:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>what themes did you find in these fourth films? But

193
00:11:20.919 --> 00:11:23.919
<v Speaker 2>I imagine each one is a unique case. It's not like

194
00:11:24.000 --> 00:11:26.440
<v Speaker 2>you can just use one brush to paint this. Even

195
00:11:26.480 --> 00:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to I imagine the horror franchises which

196
00:11:28.840 --> 00:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>are famous for going well beyond four.

197
00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are similarities, but there are also huge differences.

198
00:11:35.399 --> 00:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Like for Halloween four was an attempt to go back

199
00:11:39.879 --> 00:11:44.279
<v Speaker 1>to the basics after Halloween three did not feature Michael Myers.

200
00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It had to have Michael, and it had to get

201
00:11:48.000 --> 00:11:52.519
<v Speaker 1>the franchise back to a Michael Myer centered story. But

202
00:11:52.559 --> 00:11:54.399
<v Speaker 1>when I asked the writer of that, what would he

203
00:11:54.440 --> 00:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>do for Halloween five if he had his brothers, he

204
00:11:58.519 --> 00:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't pick a Michael Mike Michael Meyers story. He wanted

205
00:12:01.399 --> 00:12:03.639
<v Speaker 1>to go in another way. He followed his own impulse

206
00:12:03.840 --> 00:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>outside of that or with Psycho four, it's both a

207
00:12:08.120 --> 00:12:11.519
<v Speaker 1>prequel and a sequel. So it's a sequel to Psycho

208
00:12:11.679 --> 00:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>three and in the flashback to Young Norman Bags which

209
00:12:15.519 --> 00:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they also use as the TV show, it's a prequel

210
00:12:18.919 --> 00:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to Psycho one. Friday the Thirteenth Part four was the

211
00:12:23.320 --> 00:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>final chapter Ah, that didn't happen. Leprechaun was in space.

212
00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:33.279
<v Speaker 1>And then sometimes with these fourth movies, they're a passing

213
00:12:33.320 --> 00:12:37.519
<v Speaker 1>of the Torch, like Highlander, or intended to be a

214
00:12:37.559 --> 00:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>passing of the Torch like Highlander was supposed to transfer

215
00:12:41.279 --> 00:12:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the series from Christopher Lambert to the TV Guy, but

216
00:12:45.080 --> 00:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that didn't work. Scream seemed to have to be set

217
00:12:49.080 --> 00:12:51.919
<v Speaker 1>up to be a passing of the Torch movie, even

218
00:12:51.919 --> 00:12:54.039
<v Speaker 1>though that was part of the twist of it is

219
00:12:54.039 --> 00:12:56.919
<v Speaker 1>that it was your expectations of what a passing of

220
00:12:56.960 --> 00:13:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the Torch movie is. Yeah, there are similarities, but there's

221
00:13:01.279 --> 00:13:05.279
<v Speaker 1>also huge differences. Similar tobodies are the fourth James Bond

222
00:13:05.279 --> 00:13:08.159
<v Speaker 1>one Thunderball was the most popular for many years, the

223
00:13:08.279 --> 00:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>fourth Dirty Harry was the most popular for years. And

224
00:13:13.519 --> 00:13:16.279
<v Speaker 1>then you also see how the characters change in the

225
00:13:16.360 --> 00:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>fourth film. When you have John McClain in Diehard one,

226
00:13:21.720 --> 00:13:23.799
<v Speaker 1>you think of the scene where he's stepping on glass

227
00:13:23.799 --> 00:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's pulling it out, and that's that's as much

228
00:13:26.200 --> 00:13:28.519
<v Speaker 1>as his character can take. And then you get to

229
00:13:28.559 --> 00:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Diehard four and he's jumping from like a Harry or

230
00:13:31.360 --> 00:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a jet to the ground and he's mostly okay or Ripley,

231
00:13:35.879 --> 00:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>who died in three, is completely changed in four. She

232
00:13:42.039 --> 00:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>is not herself. And then you get that where you

233
00:13:44.759 --> 00:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>have these ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances in Part one Ripley,

234
00:13:50.840 --> 00:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>John McClain. And you can't keep on doing that. You

235
00:13:54.360 --> 00:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>can't keep on putting these people in. It can't always

236
00:13:59.120 --> 00:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be in the wrong place at the wrong time, Otherwise

237
00:14:01.480 --> 00:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it become silly. So you have to change it. And

238
00:14:04.120 --> 00:14:06.759
<v Speaker 1>that's what happens. But how does the character change, How

239
00:14:06.759 --> 00:14:08.919
<v Speaker 1>does the character that we love turn into something else?

240
00:14:09.720 --> 00:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>In some of the fourth films are some of the

241
00:14:11.639 --> 00:14:14.679
<v Speaker 2>best films of the series. Star Trek four and just

242
00:14:14.840 --> 00:14:17.639
<v Speaker 2>how great that was. And again you're talking about breaking

243
00:14:17.720 --> 00:14:20.120
<v Speaker 2>box office. I wouldn't be surprised if that was a

244
00:14:20.240 --> 00:14:23.799
<v Speaker 2>major box office holder of the whole series for quite

245
00:14:23.840 --> 00:14:24.200
<v Speaker 2>a while.

246
00:14:24.799 --> 00:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that's really interesting. With Star Trek, the fan

247
00:14:28.440 --> 00:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite is generally perceived as Wrath of Khan. That's the

248
00:14:32.360 --> 00:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one that most people try to go back to, and

249
00:14:34.879 --> 00:14:37.759
<v Speaker 1>you see it in this series and they have been

250
00:14:37.759 --> 00:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>able to replicate it. But the fourth Star Trek one,

251
00:14:40.840 --> 00:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>where they try to deliberately go beyond the base, is

252
00:14:45.320 --> 00:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>actually the most successful for many years.

253
00:14:49.039 --> 00:14:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And then it goes off a cliff almost literally right

254
00:14:53.000 --> 00:14:57.039
<v Speaker 2>after that. The poor reboot the jj Abrams films, they

255
00:14:57.159 --> 00:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>can never seem to get to that fourth one. So

256
00:14:59.240 --> 00:15:03.159
<v Speaker 2>it is interesting that there's that distinction between the two

257
00:15:03.360 --> 00:15:05.799
<v Speaker 2>areas of Star Trek. And I don't know if Next

258
00:15:05.840 --> 00:15:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Generation managed to make it to a fourth I think

259
00:15:09.440 --> 00:15:12.279
<v Speaker 2>they might have. And it depends on if you start

260
00:15:12.320 --> 00:15:16.759
<v Speaker 2>with generations versus first contacts. And I would think first

261
00:15:16.759 --> 00:15:18.720
<v Speaker 2>contact because you were talking about passing out the torch.

262
00:15:19.120 --> 00:15:25.759
<v Speaker 2>So here we are at theemicis insurrection generations and first

263
00:15:25.799 --> 00:15:28.399
<v Speaker 2>contact like there you go, give the man a cigar.

264
00:15:30.240 --> 00:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>With Star Trek. The writer told me he tried to

265
00:15:32.399 --> 00:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>seed a story in for part five, a work where

266
00:15:37.080 --> 00:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a character would have gotten pregnant and you would have

267
00:15:39.720 --> 00:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>seen their child grow up, but that was written out

268
00:15:44.240 --> 00:15:48.679
<v Speaker 1>or cut out. Really, And when you see certain series

269
00:15:48.759 --> 00:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like Mission Impossible, is where that series found what it

270
00:15:52.639 --> 00:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>wants to be. Now, the first three each had its

271
00:15:55.840 --> 00:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>own identity, and then after fourth you understood what you

272
00:15:59.559 --> 00:16:02.759
<v Speaker 1>were going to want watch each subsequent time. And Matt

273
00:16:02.840 --> 00:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Mack's the fourth one that's considered the best. But so

274
00:16:06.320 --> 00:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>part of why I was interview, why I was doing

275
00:16:08.360 --> 00:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this research, there were all these fourth films that I

276
00:16:11.039 --> 00:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>never heard of. I didn't know that there was a

277
00:16:13.200 --> 00:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Home Alone for which which was shot in South Africa

278
00:16:17.799 --> 00:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in a ridiculously short amount of time, which is funny

279
00:16:20.639 --> 00:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>because it's a very American movie. I didn't know there

280
00:16:24.360 --> 00:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was a Home Alone four. I didn't know there was

281
00:16:25.879 --> 00:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a meat Balls four. I didn't know there was a

282
00:16:28.039 --> 00:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Porky's four. Now, let's briefly talk about Meatballs four and

283
00:16:32.440 --> 00:16:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Porky's four. Porky's four was made in even less time

284
00:16:37.720 --> 00:16:42.279
<v Speaker 1>than Home Alone for because it's something called an Ashcan property,

285
00:16:42.279 --> 00:16:45.039
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, it is something which is created

286
00:16:45.799 --> 00:16:48.639
<v Speaker 1>just to hold on to the rights. So that was

287
00:16:48.639 --> 00:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a circumstance, which we've seen that with Spider Man movies

288
00:16:52.480 --> 00:16:55.559
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent, if you don't use your option

289
00:16:55.919 --> 00:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to make another movie within a certain time, you lose

290
00:16:58.039 --> 00:17:02.559
<v Speaker 1>the rights. And so with Porky's Four, that's what happened.

291
00:17:02.559 --> 00:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And the writer wrote it in a few days, and

292
00:17:04.799 --> 00:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they shot it in a few days, and it was

293
00:17:06.720 --> 00:17:10.519
<v Speaker 1>released as Himp and Peewee, not even Porky's four. But now,

294
00:17:10.599 --> 00:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>if you watch go On, you know to be or

295
00:17:12.640 --> 00:17:18.039
<v Speaker 1>whatever it's for Meatballs four is another interesting story because

296
00:17:18.039 --> 00:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know there was and I reached out to

297
00:17:20.240 --> 00:17:23.079
<v Speaker 1>the writer director just out of a sense of duty. Figure,

298
00:17:23.079 --> 00:17:25.599
<v Speaker 1>if I'm doing all these fourth movies, I should do

299
00:17:25.960 --> 00:17:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Meatballs because I see it exists. But he told me

300
00:17:29.079 --> 00:17:33.799
<v Speaker 1>this really sad story about jack nance from a raserhead

301
00:17:34.279 --> 00:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and him finding out a loved one of his died

302
00:17:37.559 --> 00:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and the tragedy that snowballed after that. But he also

303
00:17:41.720 --> 00:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>told me a story saying that he didn't start Meatballs

304
00:17:45.200 --> 00:17:49.079
<v Speaker 1>four as the fourth meat Balls film. He told me

305
00:17:49.119 --> 00:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a story where he was in the middle of production

306
00:17:52.039 --> 00:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of another film called Happy Campers, and one day the

307
00:17:55.440 --> 00:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>producer showed up and said, by the way, this is

308
00:17:58.000 --> 00:18:01.799
<v Speaker 1>now Meatballs four. Funny as one finds out what is

309
00:18:02.440 --> 00:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>working on the Bull's four when one didn't realize it

310
00:18:04.720 --> 00:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole time.

311
00:18:06.160 --> 00:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure that has happened a lot where things of

312
00:18:10.480 --> 00:18:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I remember Hackers Too was not Hackers Too. That was

313
00:18:14.400 --> 00:18:17.039
<v Speaker 2>a whole different thing, cyber track, I think they called

314
00:18:17.039 --> 00:18:19.240
<v Speaker 2>it at one point. I'm sure that when it comes

315
00:18:19.279 --> 00:18:21.039
<v Speaker 2>to the fourth film, there are a lot of those

316
00:18:21.119 --> 00:18:24.359
<v Speaker 2>stories where it's yeah, and now we've retitled I think

317
00:18:24.440 --> 00:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>House four if you remember the William cat film. Yeah,

318
00:18:29.000 --> 00:18:32.279
<v Speaker 2>I think like the fourth one is an imported Italian

319
00:18:32.319 --> 00:18:35.799
<v Speaker 2>film that they've slapped the House four label onto.

320
00:18:35.880 --> 00:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And then with Rocky four. I've always been fascinated with

321
00:18:38.799 --> 00:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Rocky four because it's the most successful one in the series,

322
00:18:42.559 --> 00:18:47.759
<v Speaker 1>but it's totally different from everything else. It doesn't fit in.

323
00:18:47.839 --> 00:18:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And then during COVID, stallone went back and re edited

324
00:18:53.279 --> 00:18:58.599
<v Speaker 1>four so that it was more totally closer to the

325
00:18:58.640 --> 00:19:01.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the series, and I thought this was a

326
00:19:01.000 --> 00:19:03.759
<v Speaker 1>great idea in theory. So he took out some of

327
00:19:03.759 --> 00:19:06.079
<v Speaker 1>the cheesy stuff he still kept in like the thirty

328
00:19:06.119 --> 00:19:10.799
<v Speaker 1>minutes of montages. There's a lot of montages, but he

329
00:19:10.839 --> 00:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>took out some of the joker stuff, he got rid

330
00:19:12.920 --> 00:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of the robot, and made it totally closer to the

331
00:19:17.759 --> 00:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>rest of the series. However, in doing so, he somehow

332
00:19:22.759 --> 00:19:26.039
<v Speaker 1>took away all the fun of what makes Rocky such

333
00:19:26.079 --> 00:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a cheesy, over the top Americana extravaganza or whatever it is.

334
00:19:32.960 --> 00:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So I thought it was a great idea, but it

335
00:19:34.519 --> 00:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>was an example of how you could take away scenes,

336
00:19:37.839 --> 00:19:43.039
<v Speaker 1>but the essence of what there was denied, and it

337
00:19:43.119 --> 00:19:46.799
<v Speaker 1>was not as successful even though it doesn't work with

338
00:19:46.839 --> 00:19:49.559
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the series. Obviously, I want people to

339
00:19:49.559 --> 00:19:51.599
<v Speaker 1>buy the book, but can you share some stories with

340
00:19:51.640 --> 00:19:56.039
<v Speaker 1>me as far as maybe some of the strangest fourth films?

341
00:19:56.440 --> 00:19:58.799
<v Speaker 1>The Meatballs one has got to be one of those. Yeah,

342
00:19:58.799 --> 00:20:01.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's some other. Really. Oh, let me just

343
00:20:01.079 --> 00:20:04.279
<v Speaker 1>briefly say, Joel Schumacher spoke to me about bat Batman

344
00:20:04.400 --> 00:20:04.759
<v Speaker 1>and Robin.

345
00:20:04.920 --> 00:20:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Good. Wasn't he nice? He was?

346
00:20:07.359 --> 00:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my gosh, So this Joel Schumacher doesn't need to

347
00:20:11.480 --> 00:20:14.279
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about Batman and Robin. There's no what

348
00:20:14.480 --> 00:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>good does that do him?

349
00:20:16.400 --> 00:20:16.599
<v Speaker 2>Right?

350
00:20:16.960 --> 00:20:19.160
<v Speaker 1>All he's been is beating over to the calls for

351
00:20:19.240 --> 00:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Batman and Robin. There's no reason for him, ducmy, Yet

352
00:20:22.079 --> 00:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we had this really sprawling conversation about Batman three and

353
00:20:26.119 --> 00:20:30.279
<v Speaker 1>four and about what sort of didn't work as well

354
00:20:30.319 --> 00:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in four that didn't three, because it's interesting it's the

355
00:20:33.000 --> 00:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>same creative team in both movies. It's it's the same director,

356
00:20:36.480 --> 00:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>it's the same writer, it's the same costumes, music, cinematographer, cinematographers,

357
00:20:43.279 --> 00:20:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it's the same world. It's the same team doing the

358
00:20:45.880 --> 00:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Yet three is generally well regarded and fourth

359
00:20:51.559 --> 00:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is not so what happens to an artist when they

360
00:20:56.319 --> 00:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>have the same goods but just fall short. And with him,

361
00:21:01.799 --> 00:21:05.599
<v Speaker 1>I said, each character, like on paper, they each have

362
00:21:05.759 --> 00:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>their own arc, they each have their own story, they

363
00:21:09.200 --> 00:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>each have something to do, which seems like it would

364
00:21:11.480 --> 00:21:14.559
<v Speaker 1>be a great idea. And then he paused and he said,

365
00:21:15.079 --> 00:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and he whispered this, maybe it was too much, And

366
00:21:19.039 --> 00:21:22.279
<v Speaker 1>it was like where we were just having a discussion

367
00:21:22.640 --> 00:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>and he had a little realization about one of the

368
00:21:25.119 --> 00:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>elements that didn't quite work in that maybe it was overstuffed.

369
00:21:28.920 --> 00:21:33.519
<v Speaker 1>And also totally it was very different than three. Three

370
00:21:33.640 --> 00:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>still had its foot in the Timberton camp, but by

371
00:21:36.759 --> 00:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the time we get to four, it's a different kind

372
00:21:39.680 --> 00:21:40.039
<v Speaker 1>of camp.

373
00:21:40.319 --> 00:21:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, so yeah, I loved Joel Schumacher. Again

374
00:21:44.920 --> 00:21:46.839
<v Speaker 2>he didn't have to talk to me about falling down,

375
00:21:46.920 --> 00:21:49.960
<v Speaker 2>but right so at that time and was so generous

376
00:21:50.000 --> 00:21:52.440
<v Speaker 2>with this time and so nice. I just couldn't get

377
00:21:52.480 --> 00:21:55.119
<v Speaker 2>over how sweet that guy was. Yeah, we really lost

378
00:21:55.119 --> 00:21:57.640
<v Speaker 2>somebody special with that one. Who were some of the

379
00:21:57.720 --> 00:21:59.119
<v Speaker 2>other folks that you track down for.

380
00:21:59.079 --> 00:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>This spoke to a key creative figure from Superman four,

381
00:22:05.319 --> 00:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Batman for James Bond four, Diehard for Rocky for Highlander,

382
00:22:10.039 --> 00:22:13.839
<v Speaker 1>for Planet of the Apes, for Star Wars four, Star

383
00:22:13.920 --> 00:22:19.519
<v Speaker 1>Trek four, Spider Man fur and the writer for what

384
00:22:19.640 --> 00:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>could have been Godfather for but wasn't. So Yeah, that's

385
00:22:25.160 --> 00:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing about when you write a book like this,

386
00:22:26.839 --> 00:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>where at least for me, you want to and you do.

387
00:22:29.519 --> 00:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the same where you want a key creative

388
00:22:32.240 --> 00:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>figure to explore that movie, and you make a rule

389
00:22:35.720 --> 00:22:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of yourself. If you don't get that key creative figure,

390
00:22:38.160 --> 00:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you can wait some other time to explore that movie.

391
00:22:40.680 --> 00:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>But I got all the big movies that I wanted.

392
00:22:43.519 --> 00:22:45.880
<v Speaker 2>We were talking about how sometimes the fourth one is

393
00:22:45.920 --> 00:22:49.279
<v Speaker 2>the best chapter. Now I would be hard pressed between

394
00:22:49.400 --> 00:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>the original Planet of the Apes, Escape from the Planet

395
00:22:52.480 --> 00:22:56.400
<v Speaker 2>of the Apes, and Conquest, but Conquest is so frickin good,

396
00:22:56.599 --> 00:22:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh my God, and another one that was marred when

397
00:22:59.359 --> 00:23:01.200
<v Speaker 2>it really came out with that ending.

398
00:23:01.799 --> 00:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Yet they try to use the fourth originally film to

399
00:23:05.400 --> 00:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>end the series, and then it was just so popular

400
00:23:08.359 --> 00:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that they said We're going to do it another one. Anyway.

401
00:23:11.119 --> 00:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I know that goes against everything we just did, But

402
00:23:15.039 --> 00:23:16.319
<v Speaker 1>we like making movies and we.

403
00:23:16.359 --> 00:23:19.599
<v Speaker 2>Like making money, even tracking down some of these as

404
00:23:19.599 --> 00:23:22.839
<v Speaker 2>far as Meatballs four probably wasn't the easiest film, Thank

405
00:23:22.839 --> 00:23:25.839
<v Speaker 2>goodness for two b For some of these, yeah, exactly tafically,

406
00:23:26.000 --> 00:23:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, tracking down both the filmmakers and the films.

407
00:23:29.960 --> 00:23:31.759
<v Speaker 2>I wrote a book on which we discussed last time,

408
00:23:31.759 --> 00:23:33.759
<v Speaker 2>called How to Be a Superhero, in which I interviewed

409
00:23:33.799 --> 00:23:38.960
<v Speaker 2>thirty five actors who played superheroes over seven decades. And

410
00:23:39.039 --> 00:23:41.599
<v Speaker 2>that book because it took so long to track them down,

411
00:23:42.559 --> 00:23:44.440
<v Speaker 2>It really took ten years to write. That was a

412
00:23:44.559 --> 00:23:47.359
<v Speaker 2>terrible idea of my part. Don't take ten years to

413
00:23:47.359 --> 00:23:47.920
<v Speaker 2>write a book.

414
00:23:48.599 --> 00:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So this time I gave myself a two or three

415
00:23:52.000 --> 00:23:54.519
<v Speaker 1>year timeframe to get it. And that's fun for me,

416
00:23:54.880 --> 00:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is tracking down the filmmakers of the films, and some

417
00:23:57.240 --> 00:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of them, like die Hard or Highlander for it, you

418
00:24:02.000 --> 00:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>could find fairly ease.

419
00:24:03.759 --> 00:24:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Was this your pandemic project? It sounds like it, doesn't it.

420
00:24:07.839 --> 00:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what? Big Or Judd wrote this book on

421
00:24:11.319 --> 00:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>comedy actors during the pandemic. I think the Bond book,

422
00:24:17.279 --> 00:24:21.039
<v Speaker 1>The Loss Avengers of James Bond was my pandemic. Okay,

423
00:24:21.279 --> 00:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>everything is much together, though, I find a sense of

424
00:24:24.240 --> 00:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic.

425
00:24:25.200 --> 00:24:27.559
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember when you wrote this or did you

426
00:24:27.599 --> 00:24:30.359
<v Speaker 2>just wake up and it was on your computer.

427
00:24:30.920 --> 00:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>It was definitely over the last few years.

428
00:24:32.480 --> 00:24:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, yeah, would you know partially still pandemic.

429
00:24:35.559 --> 00:24:36.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, we're still in the.

430
00:24:39.359 --> 00:24:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I love the attention to detail. I love the passion

431
00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:44.480
<v Speaker 2>around this. Basically, you write books the way that I

432
00:24:44.559 --> 00:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>like the podcast. Like you said, whereas I have to

433
00:24:47.000 --> 00:24:49.559
<v Speaker 2>talk with these people, I have to find these details.

434
00:24:49.640 --> 00:24:52.279
<v Speaker 2>I got to track down these scripts and all of

435
00:24:52.319 --> 00:24:55.599
<v Speaker 2>these different ideas. James Bond books are very much the

436
00:24:55.599 --> 00:24:58.119
<v Speaker 2>same way too, where you're just like, I got to

437
00:24:58.119 --> 00:25:01.640
<v Speaker 2>dig and dig, and there's really sometimes there's no basement.

438
00:25:01.720 --> 00:25:03.759
<v Speaker 2>You just keep on digging for this stuff.

439
00:25:03.799 --> 00:25:07.279
<v Speaker 1>And at some point you have to just say when, Yeah,

440
00:25:07.319 --> 00:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that is the problem because there's an infinite number of

441
00:25:10.440 --> 00:25:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Part four us. How many is too many? How many

442
00:25:14.640 --> 00:25:17.640
<v Speaker 1>actors playing superheroes does one need to talk to in

443
00:25:17.720 --> 00:25:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Wild's life? Yeah, And so you need to pull the

444
00:25:21.359 --> 00:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>plug on it at a certain point. And sometimes it's

445
00:25:24.519 --> 00:25:27.039
<v Speaker 1>just when you go, oh, let me put all these

446
00:25:27.119 --> 00:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>chapters together and you go, oh, my gosh, this is

447
00:25:30.279 --> 00:25:34.519
<v Speaker 1>several hundred more pages that I anticipated. Oops.

448
00:25:37.079 --> 00:25:39.079
<v Speaker 2>So what are you working on now? I'm so curious.

449
00:25:40.319 --> 00:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I have another book coming out which I think is

450
00:25:44.000 --> 00:25:46.279
<v Speaker 1>going to come out by the time this comes out.

451
00:25:46.839 --> 00:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been working on two other books, one both about

452
00:25:51.440 --> 00:25:54.559
<v Speaker 1>James Bond, and they're both about the Continuation novels. Is

453
00:25:54.839 --> 00:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone listening to this nos Continuation James Bond Continuation Novels

454
00:25:58.680 --> 00:26:02.559
<v Speaker 1>a novel written after Infleming passed away. They've been going

455
00:26:02.599 --> 00:26:07.039
<v Speaker 1>on the sixties till today, and there's scores and scores

456
00:26:07.079 --> 00:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of them. I wrote one book called James Bond After

457
00:26:11.000 --> 00:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Fleming the Continuation Novels, where it's a follow up book

458
00:26:14.039 --> 00:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>called Keeping Seven Alive Conversations with James Bond Continuation Authors,

459
00:26:19.279 --> 00:26:22.599
<v Speaker 1>and what that is is interviews with every single living

460
00:26:23.720 --> 00:26:27.319
<v Speaker 1>James Bond author, asking them the kind of questions of

461
00:26:27.559 --> 00:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you write it, what's it like working with

462
00:26:29.279 --> 00:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the infloment publications and things of that nature, trying to

463
00:26:32.519 --> 00:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>understand again the business side versus the creative side of

464
00:26:36.559 --> 00:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>creative creating something. And I guess that's what all these

465
00:26:39.279 --> 00:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>books are about. It's the movies Go Forth is about

466
00:26:44.920 --> 00:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the clash between art and commerce and art what artists

467
00:26:50.000 --> 00:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>want with the project and what the studio wants with

468
00:26:52.279 --> 00:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the project, and when you're dealing with the studio film.

469
00:26:57.400 --> 00:27:01.519
<v Speaker 1>You don't own Superman, you don't own that Man. You

470
00:27:01.559 --> 00:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>surely don't own Rocky. Well, you could say you that's

471
00:27:05.119 --> 00:27:07.599
<v Speaker 1>a bigger question who owns Rocky, which we'll say for

472
00:27:08.039 --> 00:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>another time. But these are studio assets, and what film

473
00:27:12.960 --> 00:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>gets made when and whether Schwarzenegger's in Terminator for or

474
00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>not is based on contracts. It's based on what the

475
00:27:22.720 --> 00:27:27.599
<v Speaker 1>studio thinks that the market demands are. And that's true

476
00:27:27.599 --> 00:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>with these franchise properties. These are much bigger than any filmmaker,

477
00:27:32.279 --> 00:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's generally a rule that you have to return

478
00:27:35.039 --> 00:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the toy to the toy chest the same way you

479
00:27:37.000 --> 00:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>found it. Occasionally you'll find you'll be in an environment

480
00:27:41.440 --> 00:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>where you have more creative agency than other times. But

481
00:27:47.640 --> 00:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't own these properties as a general rule, although

482
00:27:50.599 --> 00:27:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I did interview the Hatchet Crowley guy for the Horror

483
00:27:55.319 --> 00:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>series and he doesn't own it. But those are again

484
00:27:58.240 --> 00:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>his characters, so it's interesting their sense of proprieed ownership

485
00:28:05.240 --> 00:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of it versus with the studio things, and that's where.

486
00:28:07.519 --> 00:28:11.240
<v Speaker 2>The conflict is. I forgot that during the pandemic we

487
00:28:11.319 --> 00:28:14.279
<v Speaker 2>had at least one fourth, which was the Matrix four,

488
00:28:14.920 --> 00:28:17.359
<v Speaker 2>which I would consider a Legacy sequel, and then over

489
00:28:17.359 --> 00:28:19.920
<v Speaker 2>the last few months we had ax LEF, which was

490
00:28:19.960 --> 00:28:23.359
<v Speaker 2>the fourth over the Hills cop films. So yeah, fours

491
00:28:23.359 --> 00:28:26.039
<v Speaker 2>are alive and well, I don't know if we'll get

492
00:28:26.079 --> 00:28:28.720
<v Speaker 2>fives for either of those, but I think with axl

493
00:28:28.839 --> 00:28:31.599
<v Speaker 2>F being as successful, I think a fifth is pretty natural.

494
00:28:31.680 --> 00:28:33.359
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know if we're going to get a

495
00:28:33.359 --> 00:28:35.160
<v Speaker 2>fifth Matrix, which I'm okay with.

496
00:28:35.839 --> 00:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Fourth Matrix was a meta commentary on sequels

497
00:28:42.000 --> 00:28:45.319
<v Speaker 1>and series and franchises, so that was fun to have

498
00:28:45.400 --> 00:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that out. While I was writing these things, were saying,

499
00:28:48.720 --> 00:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>scream and you know, with these franchise sequels, they usually

500
00:28:54.480 --> 00:28:59.359
<v Speaker 1>want to have the actor in the poster and in

501
00:28:59.440 --> 00:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>some key scenes and then give the series to another

502
00:29:03.000 --> 00:29:09.119
<v Speaker 1>actor who is younger and you pay less money too,

503
00:29:09.559 --> 00:29:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you get Highlander. And that's always Now

504
00:29:13.799 --> 00:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go back to Sydney and scream. How

505
00:29:16.880 --> 00:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>far can you get away from what is the essential

506
00:29:19.079 --> 00:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>nature of the series? Is it the individual actor? You

507
00:29:22.960 --> 00:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>can't have a Dirty Harry film without Dirty Harry. One

508
00:29:25.720 --> 00:29:28.279
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I really dug about interviewing the

509
00:29:28.279 --> 00:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>guy who wrote Dirty Harry. From addition to learning how

510
00:29:30.440 --> 00:29:32.079
<v Speaker 1>he came up with these lines go ahead and make

511
00:29:32.160 --> 00:29:37.519
<v Speaker 1>my day. But he wrote a sixth Dirty Harry film

512
00:29:37.920 --> 00:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that Eastwood hoped to make one day and clearly isn't.

513
00:29:42.640 --> 00:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>But he wrote the Once Upon in Once Upon a

514
00:29:46.960 --> 00:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Time in the West esque Dirty Harry film, which is

515
00:29:51.680 --> 00:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the Dirty Harry film to end all Dirty Harry films

516
00:29:55.000 --> 00:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>about the system and all crumbling and wrapping up that story.

517
00:30:00.599 --> 00:30:04.119
<v Speaker 1>That's one thing that like, Ah, that sounds cool, Yeah,

518
00:30:04.160 --> 00:30:07.519
<v Speaker 1>because that's a series that these days, in twenty twenty four,

519
00:30:07.559 --> 00:30:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's nearly as much love as it

520
00:30:09.880 --> 00:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>used to.

521
00:30:10.480 --> 00:30:13.359
<v Speaker 2>And some of those movies are just spectacular.

522
00:30:14.200 --> 00:30:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting. Oh, when we're talking about this, you

523
00:30:17.839 --> 00:30:23.519
<v Speaker 1>think about what characters are better suited to sequels, and

524
00:30:23.640 --> 00:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Dirty Harry is well suited to SEQL because he's a cop.

525
00:30:27.039 --> 00:30:30.079
<v Speaker 1>He could always catch another case, a spy could always

526
00:30:30.079 --> 00:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>go on another mission. So I think that's one of

527
00:30:32.720 --> 00:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the reasons that some of those movies are pretty good,

528
00:30:36.680 --> 00:30:39.519
<v Speaker 1>is because it's a natural progression of that character.

529
00:30:39.920 --> 00:30:43.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, those single one and done type things. Rather than

530
00:30:44.240 --> 00:30:47.279
<v Speaker 2>to your point from earlier, too mission impossible. Each one

531
00:30:47.400 --> 00:30:50.000
<v Speaker 2>is a mission. So we're off to the racist but

532
00:30:50.039 --> 00:30:53.759
<v Speaker 2>when you come to your Star Wars films, it's okay, Well,

533
00:30:53.799 --> 00:30:56.920
<v Speaker 2>now we are telling another epic story. So how are

534
00:30:56.920 --> 00:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>we going to do this? We now need to come

535
00:30:58.720 --> 00:31:01.480
<v Speaker 2>up with three films, and judging from the last trilogy,

536
00:31:01.519 --> 00:31:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they ever mapped it out because they

537
00:31:03.400 --> 00:31:04.519
<v Speaker 2>were all so unevent.

538
00:31:05.359 --> 00:31:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

539
00:31:06.319 --> 00:31:09.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So what is after watching all of these fourths,

540
00:31:09.680 --> 00:31:11.279
<v Speaker 2>what are some of your favorites now?

541
00:31:12.039 --> 00:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I still like the Big Ones. I still like James

542
00:31:13.960 --> 00:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Bond and Batman, Zuperman, Jaws, Rocky Islander has its charms,

543
00:31:20.000 --> 00:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Planet of the Apes, but I now have a greater

544
00:31:23.839 --> 00:31:29.799
<v Speaker 1>affection for those that like me Balls for where I

545
00:31:29.920 --> 00:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>never heard of but were really important to the people

546
00:31:33.319 --> 00:31:42.079
<v Speaker 1>who are making them and how to work under difficult circumstances. Yeah,

547
00:31:42.240 --> 00:31:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it's got to be so different for one like that,

548
00:31:45.559 --> 00:31:48.519
<v Speaker 1>where they don't start off as a Meatballs film versus

549
00:31:48.519 --> 00:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>something like even the Police Academy films where it's like

550
00:31:52.000 --> 00:31:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the same people, with maybe the exception of Steve Gutenberg,

551
00:31:55.359 --> 00:31:57.839
<v Speaker 1>with so many of the cast and the creatives coming

552
00:31:57.880 --> 00:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>back together must have been like a family for some

553
00:32:00.480 --> 00:32:04.039
<v Speaker 1>of these folks. The first Police Academy I think would

554
00:32:04.079 --> 00:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be better remembered if we didn't get to mission to Moscow,

555
00:32:08.039 --> 00:32:10.319
<v Speaker 1>or if we didn't get to ten or whatever they

556
00:32:10.359 --> 00:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>got to. I think sometimes and do you see less

557
00:32:14.319 --> 00:32:19.759
<v Speaker 1>movie comedy sequels get to these big numbers. Pink Panther did.

558
00:32:20.160 --> 00:32:22.599
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's in part because the when you

559
00:32:22.640 --> 00:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>get to the second airplane, it's literally the same jokes,

560
00:32:26.079 --> 00:32:29.119
<v Speaker 1>and it holds up because the jokes are funny, and

561
00:32:29.160 --> 00:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the cast is there and Shatner is beeping and blinking.

562
00:32:32.599 --> 00:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>But you could only go so far before the element

563
00:32:36.920 --> 00:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of surprise in a comedy is just completely gone. Mark.

564
00:32:40.920 --> 00:32:43.799
<v Speaker 2>I look forward to your next book or books, since

565
00:32:43.839 --> 00:32:46.519
<v Speaker 2>you are always writing. I now need to go back

566
00:32:46.559 --> 00:32:48.880
<v Speaker 2>and check out some of these other James Bond books

567
00:32:48.880 --> 00:32:52.519
<v Speaker 2>that I've missed, so I will be downloading those via

568
00:32:53.200 --> 00:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Kindle or buying a paperback from my local independent bookstore.

569
00:32:56.960 --> 00:32:59.160
<v Speaker 2>So is there a good place for people to keep

570
00:32:59.240 --> 00:33:00.880
<v Speaker 2>up with you in your work online?

571
00:33:01.400 --> 00:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Twitter or x under Mark Edlins. These

572
00:33:04.920 --> 00:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>books take me a long time to write. I do

573
00:33:07.799 --> 00:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>them by myself, and I'm very grateful if anybody has

574
00:33:11.720 --> 00:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to check them out and read them. I

575
00:33:15.039 --> 00:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>don't take it for granted, and so I thank you

576
00:33:18.680 --> 00:33:21.039
<v Speaker 1>and anyone who has gotten this far to listen and

577
00:33:21.079 --> 00:33:22.079
<v Speaker 1>I hope to check it out.

578
00:33:22.799 --> 00:33:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Mark, thank you again, and I look forward to talking

579
00:33:24.920 --> 00:33:25.640
<v Speaker 2>to you next time.

580
00:33:26.400 --> 00:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>My pleasure and thank you do. That's that.

581
00:35:17.280 --> 00:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Then, about that boat that bo
