Speaker 1: Your summer pocket knife of information.
Speaker 2: That's the only way to stay informed.
Speaker 1: Fifty five KRC the talk station.
Speaker 2: At five, the fifty five kr CD talk station. Happy
Speaker 2: Tuesday always made extra special in this hour because we
Speaker 2: start the hour with the inside scoop from Breitbart News
Speaker 2: b R E I T b A RT dot com
Speaker 2: book Market. You were glad you did great stuff there,
Speaker 2: outstanding reporting and a lot of the stuff you're never
Speaker 2: going to stee on the legacy media or mainstream media.
Speaker 2: Welcome back to the fifty five KRC Morning Show, Debuty
Speaker 2: News Director Bradley J.
Speaker 1: From Breitbart. Always a pleasure to having you on the show.
Speaker 1: It's always great to be with you.
Speaker 2: And moving away from the chaos going on in the
Speaker 2: city of Cincinnati for a few momutes, there are all
Speaker 2: other things going on in the world, Bradley Jay.
Speaker 1: You know that.
Speaker 2: Let's talk about Texas. Texas Democrats, rather than well dealing
Speaker 2: with the vote on redistricting, packed their bags and moved out.
Speaker 2: They thus depriving the Republicans of a quorum to get
Speaker 2: this thing through. It seems inevitable, Bradley, They're going to
Speaker 2: have to, regardless of the legal status, whether they can
Speaker 2: be you know, removed from their office, or whether they
Speaker 2: can be arrested for vacating the premises and not doing
Speaker 2: the damn job that they're paid to do. They're going
Speaker 2: to have to come back at some point, and some
Speaker 2: point they're going to have a quorum, and that's when
Speaker 2: this measure is going to pass. I mean, isn't that
Speaker 2: a foregone conclusion, Bradley, It certainly.
Speaker 1: Seems like it. If if not, then these sucks might
Speaker 1: end up in the slammer. It sounds like Texas Republicans,
Speaker 1: or at least a governor Abbott and Attorney General Paxson
Speaker 1: are playing hardballs as they should. Look the these suks
Speaker 1: are talking about these Texas Democrats, Oh, we're fighting to
Speaker 1: save democracy, then going on a taxpayer funded vacation to Illinois.
Speaker 1: It's it's absurd they're there act, I mean, this is Texas.
Speaker 1: They're acting like they're storming to Alamo, like you're going
Speaker 1: to the Continental Breakfast at to the Chicago Hyatt. Give
Speaker 1: me a break, do you know anything about Texas? I
Speaker 1: don't even think that Texas voters are going to approve
Speaker 1: of this. And the fact that Paxton and Abbott are
Speaker 1: really turning the screws on them. I think is a
Speaker 1: very good thing, because the maps are far condered to
Speaker 1: Democrats than the maps in California, say, are to Republicans.
Speaker 1: Much less of state like Massachusetts or Connecticut. Texas needs
Speaker 1: to correct the problems that they have with their maps,
Speaker 1: and you're right, it seems like they're going to be
Speaker 1: able to push this through. It's not some of these
Speaker 1: Democrats might find themselves in jail.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, it's a bit of hypocrisy. They do
Speaker 2: it themselves. I mean, Illinois, New York, they've all done very,
Speaker 2: very very biased pro Democrat redistricting. I think the biggest
Speaker 2: problem they have with this, it seems to me to
Speaker 2: be from what I've read that congressional maps are typically
Speaker 2: redrawn every ten years after the census comes out, and
Speaker 2: that they should be waiting until the next sense comes out.
Speaker 2: And this is unprecedented that they would do this sort
Speaker 2: of out of cycle.
Speaker 1: It is unusual. But here's the thing. If Texas Republicans, frankly,
Speaker 1: if they would have done their job in redistricting a
Speaker 1: few years ago, we wouldn't be having this problem. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump correctly saw that there was an issue here, and
Speaker 1: he's trying to rectify it. I used to work for
Speaker 1: a Member of Congress from Texas, so I saw a
Speaker 1: lot of this as it was going on. And here's
Speaker 1: the problem. I talked about, how you know the map
Speaker 1: is so kind to Texas Democrats. Texas Republicans were scared
Speaker 1: to death a few years ago when the Beto o'
Speaker 1: warke thing was going on. Everyone talked about how Texas
Speaker 1: was turning purple. And these incumbent Republicans who were not
Speaker 1: used to campaigning, there were these establishment types. They saw
Speaker 1: that the Republican party was changing. They didn't want to
Speaker 1: have to actually get out there and campaign, so they
Speaker 1: drew maps that were very generous to Democrats so that
Speaker 1: they could insulate their own little red districts. Well, you
Speaker 1: know what, this is the party of Donald Trump. Now
Speaker 1: you're going to actually have to move at his speed
Speaker 1: or you're going to get left behind. So I think
Speaker 1: that Trump is right to push these folks out and say,
Speaker 1: you know what, we've got to correct these maps. We
Speaker 1: can't just in state after state after state, cut these
Speaker 1: districts to just give away the farm to Democrats, or
Speaker 1: else we're never going to have any congressional majorities. And
Speaker 1: even if we do have slim majorities and the White House,
Speaker 1: we want to be able to get something done. So
Speaker 1: they're moving on this, and I think that it's a
Speaker 1: good development and a sign that, you know what, Republicans
Speaker 1: we got to start playing the game as aggressively as
Speaker 1: Democrats do.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the tit for tad thing is kind of
Speaker 2: ridiculous too. Gavin Newsom and Governor Hokel both said, well,
Speaker 2: if they go through this, we're going to do it
Speaker 2: here as well. In other words, try to rejigger their
Speaker 2: the redistricting in order to secure more democratic seats and
Speaker 2: those already left leaning states. It just all seems so childish. Bradley, Well,
Speaker 2: it does.
Speaker 1: But politics is a field in which you can go
Speaker 1: very far if you suffer from just an utter lack
Speaker 1: of shame. And Gavin Newsom certainly fits the bill there.
Speaker 1: And he's talking about spending two hundred and fifty million
Speaker 1: dollars on a special election just to have the right
Speaker 1: to redraw those maps. And the current the current breakdown
Speaker 1: of congressional seats in California is forty two Democrats to
Speaker 1: nine Republicans. Yeah, and that's like the high water mark
Speaker 1: for Republicans. The way that the map is so jerry
Speaker 1: mandered right now for Democrats is so hypocritical. You hit
Speaker 1: on that earlier, and you're exactly right. No one jerry
Speaker 1: manders like Democrats do. And this is being exposed. If
Speaker 1: you look at the Illinois map, state where all these
Speaker 1: Texas Democrats fleed to. Just look at the map. There
Speaker 1: are all these blue fingers and tentacles throughout the state.
Speaker 1: It's so clear Democrats made such a bad pr move
Speaker 1: flee into that state. And even on CNN AlSi starting
Speaker 1: to come around and criticize Democrats for this stand that
Speaker 1: they're taking. It's not a principled stand.
Speaker 2: It does not seem to be so all right pivoting over,
Speaker 2: I thought, well, this is in true Trump form. He
Speaker 2: told Chucky Schumer to go to hell the other day.
Speaker 1: Brad, It's about time, right, Yeah. Yet, so what Schumer
Speaker 1: is trying to do is essentially hold the work of
Speaker 1: the Senate hostage. Democrats have not allowed any of Trump's
Speaker 1: nominations to go forward. They're making the Senate bleed so
Speaker 1: much unnecessary time off the calendar, so that all they're
Speaker 1: doing is just turning through all these procedural steps to
Speaker 1: advance Trump's nominations, and Tumor. You can call it horse trading,
Speaker 1: you can call it extortion. It's probably more of the latter.
Speaker 1: Tumor is saying, you know what, will less you get
Speaker 1: through these nominations a little more expediently if you will
Speaker 1: give us a few billion dollars here for some Obamacare
Speaker 1: federal subsidies, or if you'll make some promises on the
Speaker 1: appropriations bills that are coming up. Trump is telling the
Speaker 1: majority leader soon, you know what nonsense, We're gonna play hardball.
Speaker 1: And it reminds me of something that russ Vote, the
Speaker 1: O and B director said a few weeks ago. He said, look,
Speaker 1: no admit to the polls in November because they wanted
Speaker 1: a more bipartisan appropriations process. Okay, we need to actually
Speaker 1: move in the Congress to advance the Trump agenda that
Speaker 1: voters sent folks Washington to accomplish. So I think that
Speaker 1: Trump is right here again. Are you noticing a theme here? Yes,
Speaker 1: a distinct thing from Trump administration. All right, so he
Speaker 1: stands his ground.
Speaker 2: Isn't this a cant of parallel be drawn between this
Speaker 2: and the nonsense going on in Texas? I mean Schumer
Speaker 2: can screw around with the rules and delay, delay, delay
Speaker 2: all he wants, but ultimately they're going to have to
Speaker 2: be put to a vote. So again, aren't we looking
Speaker 2: at a foregone conclusion even if delayed. Bradley, You're exactly right.
Speaker 2: And the split screen here is remarkable. On one side,
Speaker 2: you have Republicans who are actually trying to get things done,
Speaker 2: to move the ball foward, to push an agenda. What
Speaker 2: do you have On the other side, you have a
Speaker 2: bunch of grand standing. You have a bunch of Democrats
Speaker 2: who don't have a leader, don't have a message, don't
Speaker 2: have an agenda. They are trying to desperately appear authentic
Speaker 2: by cursing left and right. I don't know if you've
Speaker 2: noticed oh yeah on their social media channels on TVs.
Speaker 2: Democrats think that that makes them look tough. But yet
Speaker 2: it's just setting themselves up for failure because it ultimately,
Speaker 2: as you were saying, they're just they're they're going to
Speaker 2: lose these battles anyway. So it's just short sightedness on
Speaker 2: the parts part of Democrats.
Speaker 1: Uh. And it's it's giving Republicans an advantage going into
Speaker 1: the midterms if we can actually be bold and aggressive
Speaker 1: enough to take advantage of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Bradley, you know, I'm glad you brought up that
Speaker 2: whole cursing thing because that that's a fairly recent phenomenal.
Speaker 2: I mean, people been cursing forever, but the elected officials,
Speaker 2: you know, people that you hold a position of at
Speaker 2: least a supposed respect and accountability, that they that they
Speaker 2: devolve into, you know, cursing like sailors. I mean, f
Speaker 2: bombs left and right. You have people talking heads and
Speaker 2: mainstream media doing it now. I mean, they're just screening
Speaker 2: into the wind, and I think it delegitimizes whatever message
Speaker 2: they're trying to get through. And maybe, just maybe, Bradley,
Speaker 2: they have no message and therefore have to default to
Speaker 2: this shocking language in order to get attention. I mean,
Speaker 2: I don't understand where it comes from other than my
Speaker 2: latter conclusion.
Speaker 1: You're right, it does legitimize their message. What message they have.
Speaker 1: I assume that they got some memo from up high,
Speaker 1: from some built way consultant. And look, I've worked in
Speaker 1: DC long enough to know that the reason that these
Speaker 1: Washington consultants are so bad at their job is because
Speaker 1: they don't respect the people that they're trying to reach.
Speaker 1: They don't think highly of the American people. They look
Speaker 1: down upon trum and that's why they have trouble reaching them.
Speaker 1: And if this is the playbook that Democrats are using,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you it's not going to end up working.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And another's dude observation, Bradley. They really do think
Speaker 2: very little of our abilities generally speaking. You know, they
Speaker 2: think they need to direct our lives, tell us how
Speaker 2: to live our lives, tell us what we can and
Speaker 2: cannot have. And of course, you know an end scream
Speaker 2: at the Republicans for being faun fascist. I mean, definitionly speaking,
Speaker 2: they are the fascist. They're trying to tell us how
Speaker 2: to live our lives having, how to run our business,
Speaker 2: and what we can and cannot have. So they just
Speaker 2: think we're a bunch of idiots, I believe. I mean,
Speaker 2: they're so paternalistic it's disgusting, most notably to people of color.
Speaker 1: That's so true. And you've seen these American Eagle Sydney
Speaker 1: Sweeney ads for sure. Who hasn't and they're saying that
Speaker 1: these that those ads are somehow fascist and demeaning to minorities. No, look,
Speaker 1: I don't think there's anyone with the brain who looks
Speaker 1: at that and thinks that that's somehow fascist if it is,
Speaker 1: and then throw me under the jail. I thought that.
Speaker 1: I thought that the ads were fantastic, But you're so right.
Speaker 1: It's paternalistic, it's demeaning. Is anyone other than just an
Speaker 1: absolute radical partisan buying this nonsense? Once again? Democrats are
Speaker 1: getting out over their skis. And if Republicans can act,
Speaker 1: actually go on the offensive, they can take advantage of this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know, that ad campaign would work if they
Speaker 2: had a very attractive and shapely black woman in those
Speaker 2: genes as well. Just noting that anyhow, that's.
Speaker 1: Right, and there are plenty of ads like that as well,
Speaker 1: and they go relatively under the radar without any outrage.
Speaker 2: All right, Bradley, let's wows. Director of Bradley Jay, let's
Speaker 2: end the discussion on Trump firing the labor stats at
Speaker 2: I mean, that's like, isn't that just shooting the messenger?
Speaker 2: It just seemed like, wait a second, you know, are
Speaker 2: they that bad that she cook the books? Or is
Speaker 2: this like everything else? The data trickles in slowly, and
Speaker 2: then ultimately some quarter down the road, we finally have
Speaker 2: all the information and collecting and then can provide some
Speaker 2: accurate employment information. I mean that's the way I understand
Speaker 2: the process works. What's your take, Bradley.
Speaker 1: As Trump pointed out this, under this person's leadership, the
Speaker 1: Bureau of Labor Statistics jobs numbers leading up to the
Speaker 1: election in twenty twenty five for five like a million
Speaker 1: jobs grossly overestimated how well the economy was doing. Voters
Speaker 1: out there obviously didn't fill those fake numbers. They knew
Speaker 1: what was going on. They didn't buy it. The same
Speaker 1: thing recently, Trump is saying that the job's numbers were
Speaker 1: way too high. He was right. He was saying that
Speaker 1: the rates needed being cut. He was right. Part of
Speaker 1: the reason that the said was justifying keeping the rates
Speaker 1: high was because the numbers were so high. Look, you
Speaker 1: can talk about the process and the formula and the books,
Speaker 1: but results matter for you. For me, if we're out
Speaker 1: there spitting a bunch of fake news, you know what,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to pay the consequences of it. If
Speaker 1: this bureaucrat was a true leader and they would actually
Speaker 1: be doing something to fix the system that they used
Speaker 1: instead of falling back on it. This person was appointed
Speaker 1: by Biden. Let's be charitable and say that they're not
Speaker 1: politically motivated. Well, they're not doing a good job. We
Speaker 1: need a leader to come in and say that, you
Speaker 1: know what, we need to shake up the system and
Speaker 1: find something that actually works. He gets these people who
Speaker 1: rely upon these numbers to steer our economy. Let's get
Speaker 1: into the numbers that they need. Trump wants to put
Speaker 1: someone in there who can actually do that. And once again, look,
Speaker 1: Trump is thinking outside the box and not just oh,
Speaker 1: we need to maintain the status quo, the status quo
Speaker 1: that has failed the people time and again. He's exactly
Speaker 1: right and justified in firing this person and bringing in
Speaker 1: someone who can do a better job.
Speaker 2: Fair take, as always from Bradley Jay. He's the deputy
Speaker 2: news director at Breitbart Again Breitbart dot com. Please bookmark
Speaker 2: it and check it out each and every day. You'll
Speaker 2: be glad you did. Bradley, appreciate you coming on the
Speaker 2: program and sharing your knowledge and information with my listeners.
Speaker 2: I look forward to having you back on real soon.
Speaker 2: Have a wonderful week, and give the rest of the
Speaker 2: crew at Breitbart a hello. From the fifty five KRC
Speaker 2: Morning Show.
Speaker 1: Absolutely best wishes, to everyone.
Speaker 2: Up in Ohio. Thanks brother, we'll talk again soon. It's
Speaker 2: a twenty right now at fifty five krs the talk
Speaker 2: station and coming up the Daniel Davis Deep Die. We
Speaker 2: get the latest on the situation Ukraine and of course Gaza,
Speaker 2: both which appeared to be spiraling out of control. But
Speaker 2: first an opportunity to get rid of that pain. My
Speaker 2: arthritis pain suffers getting out of bed. You hit the
Speaker 2: ground and bag them right away. Heck, maybe it even
Speaker 2: hurts in bed. I don't know. God bless me because
Speaker 2: I don't struggle with arthritis pain. But if I did,
Speaker 2: I would pause. Because my doctor talked about surgery with me,
Speaker 2: and I knew that there was another option out there
Speaker 2: that I could check into and find out. I would
Speaker 2: definitely look into it.