WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the

2
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're diving right back into

3
00:00:06.519 --> 00:00:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the discussion about Jeffrey Epstein and the failure of the

4
00:00:10.519 --> 00:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>DOJ to go after his enterprise, and that history is

5
00:00:14.439 --> 00:00:18.039
<v Speaker 1>why assurances that later prosecutors would follow the facts wherever

6
00:00:18.079 --> 00:00:23.039
<v Speaker 1>they lead has always rung hollow. After Maxwell's conviction, sdn

7
00:00:23.199 --> 00:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Y publicly promised that no one, however powerful or well connected,

8
00:00:27.199 --> 00:00:30.239
<v Speaker 1>stood above the law. Fine words are not the same

9
00:00:30.280 --> 00:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>thing as indictments. The public has never seen a corresponding

10
00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>wave of federal prosecutions dismantling the broader Epstein infrastructure. We've

11
00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>not seen racketeering charges against an operational network. We haven't

12
00:00:43.880 --> 00:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>seen a comprehensive criminal accounting of Epstein's financial apparatus. We

13
00:00:48.359 --> 00:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have not seen an immigration fraud prosecution tying foreign recruitment

14
00:00:52.439 --> 00:00:55.719
<v Speaker 1>to the enterprise. We have not seen an obstruction case

15
00:00:55.960 --> 00:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>explaining years of alleged concealment. The government's rhetoric expanded, while

16
00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>its defendant lists remained astonishingly small. The most serious inference

17
00:01:05.959 --> 00:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is therefore institutional, rather than conspiratorial. Prosecutors understood that an

18
00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>authentic reco investigation could not be tightly controlled around Epstein

19
00:01:16.079 --> 00:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and Maxwell, because the statute's logic demands investigation of the

20
00:01:20.079 --> 00:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>enterprise itself. Once investigators begin mapping in enterprise, they don't

21
00:01:25.120 --> 00:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>know in advance where the evidence will terminate. Financial records

22
00:01:28.599 --> 00:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>may lead to professionals. Travel records may lead to additional witnesses.

23
00:01:33.760 --> 00:01:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Immigration files may expose document fraud. Witness testimony may identify recruiters, facilitators, abusers,

24
00:01:40.879 --> 00:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or people involved in concealment. Cooperation agreements may reveal entirely

25
00:01:46.239 --> 00:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>new branches of conduct. A government determined to limit institutional

26
00:01:50.400 --> 00:01:54.599
<v Speaker 1>fallout would have every incentive to avoid opening that investigative

27
00:01:54.719 --> 00:01:58.319
<v Speaker 1>architecture in the first place. Now, look, that doesn't mean

28
00:01:58.319 --> 00:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a publicly proven memo saying do not charge Rico

29
00:02:01.560 --> 00:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>because too many important people will get caught. No such

30
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>evidence is necessary to make the broader institutional critique. Bureaucracies

31
00:02:09.800 --> 00:02:15.159
<v Speaker 1>rarely document self protective incentives in cartoonishly explicit language. Decisions

32
00:02:15.240 --> 00:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>reveal priorities through what institutions repeatedly choose to investigate, charge, immunize, disclose,

33
00:02:22.199 --> 00:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and ignore. In Epstein's case, the pattern included in an

34
00:02:26.000 --> 00:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily broad non prosecution agreement, protection for potential co conspirators,

35
00:02:31.240 --> 00:02:35.599
<v Speaker 1>secrecy from victims, a limited state resolution, a narrow twenty

36
00:02:35.639 --> 00:02:40.319
<v Speaker 1>nineteen indictment, one subsequent marquee prosecution, and years of public

37
00:02:40.400 --> 00:02:46.479
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty about the wider network. Individually, each choice can be rationalized. Collectively,

38
00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they form a damning picture of containment. At minimum, the

39
00:02:50.599 --> 00:02:54.439
<v Speaker 1>government consistently chose strategies that minimize the number of people

40
00:02:54.520 --> 00:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>exposed to criminal adjudication. En Rico would have threatened that

41
00:02:59.560 --> 00:03:05.759
<v Speaker 1>containment because conspiracy liability is especially dangerous to compartmentalize criminal organizations,

42
00:03:06.639 --> 00:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>A defendant does not necessarily escape a reco conspiracy merely

43
00:03:10.439 --> 00:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>because someone else personally committed particular racketeering acts. The focus

44
00:03:15.240 --> 00:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>can become whether participants agreed to further the criminal enterprise

45
00:03:19.479 --> 00:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and understood its essential nature. That allows prosecutors to examine managers, organizers, recruiters, administrators,

46
00:03:27.919 --> 00:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and facilitators according to their actual functions. The statute is

47
00:03:32.840 --> 00:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>designed to penetrate division of labor. Epstein's operation depended on

48
00:03:37.639 --> 00:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>division of labor. Girls had to be located, contacted, scheduled, transported, paid,

49
00:03:42.759 --> 00:03:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes recruited again. Properties had to be staffed, travel arranged,

50
00:03:47.800 --> 00:03:53.199
<v Speaker 1>and money constantly supplied. The government understood exactly that principle

51
00:03:53.319 --> 00:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>when it prosecuted Kelly. Kelly didn't personally drive every car,

52
00:03:57.680 --> 00:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>purchase every ticket, arrange every whole time, tell room, or

53
00:04:01.120 --> 00:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>escort every victim. Prosecutors alleged that members of his entourage

54
00:04:06.000 --> 00:04:10.599
<v Speaker 1>performed complementary roles that furthered his objectives. That was enough

55
00:04:10.599 --> 00:04:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to make their conduct relevant to the enterprise theory. Epstein's

56
00:04:14.240 --> 00:04:18.439
<v Speaker 1>world contained the same basic division between principle and infrastructure,

57
00:04:19.240 --> 00:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>only on a spectacular international skill. The analytical inconsistency is glaring.

58
00:04:25.920 --> 00:04:30.639
<v Speaker 1>When R. Kelly's assistants allegedly facilitated access to victims, prosecutors

59
00:04:30.639 --> 00:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>called it racketeering infrastructure. When Epstein's employees and associates helped

60
00:04:36.000 --> 00:04:39.399
<v Speaker 1>maintain a steady supply of miners, the government described the

61
00:04:39.399 --> 00:04:44.439
<v Speaker 1>facts but stopped short of the same organizational indictment. Now,

62
00:04:44.519 --> 00:04:49.519
<v Speaker 1>the Rainiery comparison is harsher because prosecutors followed peripheral crimes outward.

63
00:04:49.959 --> 00:04:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Nexium's case included identity fraud, immigration offenses, obstruction, wire fraud, extortion,

64
00:04:55.800 --> 00:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>forced labor, money laundering allegations, and sex trafficking with in

65
00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>the same organizational story. That is exactly what rico permits

66
00:05:04.279 --> 00:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors to do when different crimes sustain the same enterprise.

67
00:05:10.000 --> 00:05:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's world has long generated serious allegations involving trafficking, financial impropriety,

68
00:05:16.160 --> 00:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>immigration schemes, false statements, obstruction, exploitation, and the concealment of

69
00:05:21.680 --> 00:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>criminal activity. A competent enterprise investigation would not assume that

70
00:05:26.759 --> 00:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>all allegations are true. It would test them. It would

71
00:05:29.720 --> 00:05:35.439
<v Speaker 1>subpoena records, compel testimony where legally possible, immunize, strategically, prosecute

72
00:05:35.480 --> 00:05:39.519
<v Speaker 1>provable falsehoods, and build predicate acts one by one. The

73
00:05:39.600 --> 00:05:43.319
<v Speaker 1>absence of such visible comprehensiveness remains one of the defining

74
00:05:43.360 --> 00:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>scandals of the whole Epstein case. There is also an

75
00:05:47.600 --> 00:05:52.519
<v Speaker 1>accountability reason for rigo that goes beyond convictions. Racketeering cases

76
00:05:52.680 --> 00:05:59.399
<v Speaker 1>create records. They produce speaking indictments forfeiture allegations, enterprise descriptions,

77
00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:06.519
<v Speaker 1>operating witness testimony, financial exhibits, communications, plea allocutions, sentencing memoranda,

78
00:06:06.839 --> 00:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and judicial findings. Those materials explain organizations to the public.

79
00:06:12.720 --> 00:06:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's story instead became a documentary graveyard spread across civil cases,

80
00:06:17.920 --> 00:06:24.439
<v Speaker 1>seal filings, regulatory actions, victim testimony, leaked records, investigative journalism,

81
00:06:24.480 --> 00:06:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and you know, periodic government disclosure, and that fragmentation has

82
00:06:28.480 --> 00:06:31.519
<v Speaker 1>helped every interested party claim that the public is must

83
00:06:31.519 --> 00:06:35.199
<v Speaker 1>misunderstanding something. Because the definitive criminal case was never built,

84
00:06:36.000 --> 00:06:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a Rico prosecution could have forced the federal government to

85
00:06:38.920 --> 00:06:42.319
<v Speaker 1>put its theory of the enterprise on paper. The failure

86
00:06:42.360 --> 00:06:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to do so ensured the crucial questions survived Epstein himself.

87
00:06:46.680 --> 00:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think this all matters because criminal accountability is

88
00:06:49.959 --> 00:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>not simply about maximizing a sentence against one defendant. Epstein

89
00:06:54.639 --> 00:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>already faced devastating trafficking exposure in twenty nineteen, Maxwell ultimately

90
00:06:59.800 --> 00:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>received twenty years. A prosecutor focused only on those numbers

91
00:07:04.279 --> 00:07:08.079
<v Speaker 1>could argue that adding Rico would have been redundant. But

92
00:07:08.199 --> 00:07:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Rico's value was never principally about adding another twenty years

93
00:07:11.959 --> 00:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to Epstein's theoretical sentence. Its value was forcing the government

94
00:07:16.600 --> 00:07:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute the organization rather than the personality. Kelly's Rico

95
00:07:21.480 --> 00:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>case explained how his entourage allegedly enabled them. Nexium's prosecution

96
00:07:25.839 --> 00:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>explained how Raynier's organization transformed different crimes into a single system.

97
00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's case demanded that same institutional clarity, because almost every

98
00:07:36.879 --> 00:07:41.319
<v Speaker 1>major mystery surrounding him concerns infrastructure. Who recruited the victims,

99
00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:44.519
<v Speaker 1>who scheduled them, who arranged travel, who moved money, who

100
00:07:44.600 --> 00:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>knew ages, who facilitated foreign recruitment, who responded to law

101
00:07:49.120 --> 00:07:53.519
<v Speaker 1>enforcement's attention, who helped preserve Epstein's access after the two

102
00:07:53.519 --> 00:07:57.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight conviction. Those are enterprise questions, not merely

103
00:07:57.959 --> 00:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>questions about one man's sexual apple tights. The government's reluctance

104
00:08:02.120 --> 00:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is even less defensible because RICO does not require prosecutors

105
00:08:05.720 --> 00:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to charge every conceivable participants simultaneously. They could have started

106
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:14.959
<v Speaker 1>narrowly with Epstein, Maxwell and the strongest provable operational defendants.

107
00:08:15.560 --> 00:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>They could have superseded the indictment as cooperators emerged and

108
00:08:19.319 --> 00:08:23.439
<v Speaker 1>evidence developed. They could have severed defendants where fairness required it.

109
00:08:23.959 --> 00:08:27.199
<v Speaker 1>They could have charged some participants with racketeering and others

110
00:08:27.399 --> 00:08:31.199
<v Speaker 1>with standalone offenses. They could have used immunity strategically for

111
00:08:31.279 --> 00:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>lesser actors. They could have prosecuted immigration or financial crime separately,

112
00:08:36.559 --> 00:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>while using them as evidence of enterprise conduct. Federal prosecutors

113
00:08:41.039 --> 00:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>manage complex organizations. This way constantly, and keep in mind,

114
00:08:44.960 --> 00:08:49.799
<v Speaker 1>a RICO investigation would not have required criminalizing Epstein's entire

115
00:08:49.879 --> 00:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>legitimate business life. RICO enterprises frequently mixed lawful and unlawful activity.

116
00:08:56.399 --> 00:09:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Kelley's alleged enterprise existed alongside a legitimate music career. Colm's

117
00:09:00.759 --> 00:09:04.720
<v Speaker 1>alleged enterprise was tied to legitimate business and employees. Even

118
00:09:04.759 --> 00:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>though the jury ultimately rejected the racketeering charge, Nexium sold

119
00:09:10.039 --> 00:09:14.159
<v Speaker 1>legitimate looking courses while criminal conduct occurred within its hierarchy.

120
00:09:14.960 --> 00:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>The legal question is whether the enterprise affairs were conducted

121
00:09:18.519 --> 00:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>through a pattern of racketeering activity. Epstein's legitimate investments and

122
00:09:22.879 --> 00:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>financial relationships therefore would not have defeated or reco theory.

123
00:09:27.120 --> 00:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>They may have actually made enterprise analysis more necessary. I

124
00:09:31.360 --> 00:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>think that the moral comparison with Kelly is particularly difficult

125
00:09:34.600 --> 00:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>for DOJ to escape. Kelly was a wealthy celebrity accused

126
00:09:38.480 --> 00:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of using employees and entourage members to obtain and control

127
00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>women and girls. Epstein was a wealthy financier accused of

128
00:09:46.519 --> 00:09:51.919
<v Speaker 1>using employees, associates, victim recruiters, properties, money, and travel infrastructure

129
00:09:52.080 --> 00:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to obtain and exploit girls. Prosecutors looked at Kelly and

130
00:09:55.759 --> 00:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>saw an enterprise. Prosecutors looked at Epstein and saw two

131
00:09:59.200 --> 00:10:04.799
<v Speaker 1>trafficking counts. Kelley's prosecution ultimately produced a racketeering conviction and

132
00:10:04.840 --> 00:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year sentence. Epstein died before his narrow federal

133
00:10:08.759 --> 00:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>prosecution could reach them. The difference cannot be explained by

134
00:10:13.279 --> 00:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>statutory impossibility, and the most disturbing explanation is not that

135
00:10:17.759 --> 00:10:22.759
<v Speaker 1>DOJ lawyers were too stupid to recognize Rico. Federal prosecutors

136
00:10:22.879 --> 00:10:27.159
<v Speaker 1>understand racketeering law perfectly well. The more troubling possibility is

137
00:10:27.159 --> 00:10:30.919
<v Speaker 1>that an enterprise prosecution created a risk the government did

138
00:10:30.960 --> 00:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not want to assume. Because genuine enterprise cases expand rather

139
00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>than contract. They create cooperating witnesses, They expose finances, They

140
00:10:40.279 --> 00:10:44.759
<v Speaker 1>pull peripheral actors into grand juries. They generate documentary trails.

141
00:10:44.919 --> 00:10:49.919
<v Speaker 1>They cross jurisdictional and institutional boundaries. In Epstein's world, those

142
00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>trails potentially ran through banks, companies, immigration arrangements, elite households,

143
00:10:54.879 --> 00:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>political circles, international relationships, universities, foundations, lawyers, account mountains, employees,

144
00:11:01.720 --> 00:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and powerful social networks. Of course, that doesn't mean that

145
00:11:05.759 --> 00:11:09.799
<v Speaker 1>every institution or individual in those circles committed crimes. It

146
00:11:09.879 --> 00:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>means a properly aggressive investigation could not know where criminal

147
00:11:14.399 --> 00:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence would end up until investigators actually followed it. Epstein's

148
00:11:19.960 --> 00:11:25.559
<v Speaker 1>case was politically radioactive precisely because ordinary investigative methods threatened

149
00:11:25.600 --> 00:11:30.799
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary people. Narrow charging kept the radius manageable, but Rico

150
00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>would have made it uncontrollable. So the case against the

151
00:11:34.600 --> 00:11:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department is not dependent on proving some cinematic conspiracy

152
00:11:38.440 --> 00:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in which officials gathered around the table and agreed to

153
00:11:41.080 --> 00:11:45.799
<v Speaker 1>protect Epstein's friends. The case is built on decisions the

154
00:11:45.840 --> 00:11:50.799
<v Speaker 1>government had extensive evidence and negotiated downward. It protected potential

155
00:11:50.799 --> 00:11:55.519
<v Speaker 1>co conspirators, it excluded victims from crucial negotiation. It later

156
00:11:55.559 --> 00:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>described employees and associates as components of Epstein's trafficking machinery,

157
00:12:00.559 --> 00:12:03.919
<v Speaker 1>but still declined to publicly charge the machinery as a

158
00:12:04.000 --> 00:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>racketeering enterprise. Comparable federal cases against Kelley and Ranieri demonstrate

159
00:12:09.200 --> 00:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that Rico was capable of reaching organizations built around sexual exploitation.

160
00:12:15.039 --> 00:12:17.159
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think that the record deserves anger,

161
00:12:17.279 --> 00:12:21.399
<v Speaker 1>because Rico exists for exactly the situation in which individual

162
00:12:21.440 --> 00:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>crimes are merely the visible outputs of an organized system.

163
00:12:25.320 --> 00:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's abuse required victims, but the enterprise required recruitment, money scheduling, transportation,

164
00:12:31.440 --> 00:12:36.519
<v Speaker 1>property secrecy, and continued access. The Maxwell conviction established that

165
00:12:36.559 --> 00:12:39.639
<v Speaker 1>he had a knowing partner in significant parts of that system.

166
00:12:40.080 --> 00:12:45.399
<v Speaker 1>The twenty nineteen indictment expressly identified employees and associates helping

167
00:12:45.440 --> 00:12:49.399
<v Speaker 1>maintain the victim's supply. The government's own words therefore supplied

168
00:12:49.440 --> 00:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the enterprise theory. Whatever followed was a

169
00:12:53.279 --> 00:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>prosecutorial determination to finish it, and that result is one

170
00:12:58.600 --> 00:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of the most consequential missed uptunities in modern federal law enforcement.

171
00:13:02.840 --> 00:13:05.399
<v Speaker 1>RICO could have been the mechanism for turning the Epstein

172
00:13:05.519 --> 00:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>story from a biography of a monstrous billionaire into a

173
00:13:09.440 --> 00:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>prosecution of the machinery that sustained them. It could have

174
00:13:13.000 --> 00:13:18.519
<v Speaker 1>provided leverage against knowing facilitators, unified crimes, crossing jurisdictions, opened

175
00:13:18.519 --> 00:13:23.159
<v Speaker 1>broader forfeiture avenues, and forced prosecutors to confront financial and

176
00:13:23.279 --> 00:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>immigration misconduct linked to the enterprise where the evidence supported it.

177
00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It could have exposed whether powerful associates were criminals, witnesses, facilitators,

178
00:13:33.080 --> 00:13:37.759
<v Speaker 1>victims of Epstein's manipulation, or simply people unfortunate enough to

179
00:13:37.840 --> 00:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>know them. Instead, those distinctions remain polluted by secrecy and

180
00:13:42.279 --> 00:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>speculation because the comprehensive criminal adjudication never occurred. The government

181
00:13:48.159 --> 00:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>proudly dismantled Kelly's enterprise and Raynieri's enterprise never dismantled Epstein's

182
00:13:53.399 --> 00:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>enterprise in open court. That's not merely a historical curiosity.

183
00:13:58.039 --> 00:14:02.639
<v Speaker 1>It's an enduring indictment, a federal prosecutorial judgment. And that's

184
00:14:02.639 --> 00:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>why the question of RICO will continue hanging over the

185
00:14:05.200 --> 00:14:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Epstein scandal, regardless of how many documents DOJ releases or

186
00:14:09.320 --> 00:14:13.159
<v Speaker 1>how many officials in Sissy investigation was thorough. A thorough

187
00:14:13.200 --> 00:14:17.879
<v Speaker 1>investigation of an enterprise leaves behind identifiable accounting of the enterprise.

188
00:14:18.279 --> 00:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>It tells the public who knowingly participated who did not,

189
00:14:21.440 --> 00:14:24.799
<v Speaker 1>while crimes sustain the organization, how its money moved, how

190
00:14:24.879 --> 00:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>victims were recruited, how borders were crossed, how records were handled,

191
00:14:29.559 --> 00:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and how the organization defended itself when threatened. The federal

192
00:14:33.480 --> 00:14:39.559
<v Speaker 1>government never provided that accounting. Instead, survivors, journalists, civil litigants, regulators,

193
00:14:39.720 --> 00:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>congressional investigators, and the public have spent years reconstructing it

194
00:14:44.080 --> 00:14:47.399
<v Speaker 1>piece by piece, The Department of Justice possessed the most

195
00:14:47.440 --> 00:14:51.919
<v Speaker 1>powerful investigative machinery in the world and repeatedly chose a

196
00:14:52.000 --> 00:14:55.519
<v Speaker 1>much more narrow road. Whether that choice arose from cowardice,

197
00:14:55.720 --> 00:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>institutional self protection, excessive deference to wealth and influence, fear

198
00:15:00.879 --> 00:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of evidentiary complexity, or some combination of those forces, remains

199
00:15:05.240 --> 00:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate subject of investigation. What should no longer be

200
00:15:09.519 --> 00:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>treated as legitimate is a claim that Rico had nothing

201
00:15:12.480 --> 00:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>meaningful to offer because the government's own cases against Kelly

202
00:15:16.399 --> 00:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ray Neery and Comb's demolished. That excuse, all right, folks,

203
00:15:22.039 --> 00:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that's going to do it for this one and for

204
00:15:24.200 --> 00:15:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the series. All the information that goes with this episode

205
00:15:28.000 --> 00:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>can be found in the description box.