Speaker 1: Okay, I want you to just close your eyes for
a second and imagine this. You're an archivist, maybe decades
from now, and your job is to review the most
sensitive lockdown files in your nation's history, right, and you
find something that just doesn't make sense, not because it's
blacked out or censored, but because the government kept this
thing locked away for generations, not to hide a secret
from an enemy, but because well, internally, they couldn't make
it fit with reality.
Speaker 2: And that's exactly what we're looking at today, these documents,
and we have synthesized, I mean a whole stack of
them for you. They are way beyond rumors or speculation.
Speaker 1: Oh.
Speaker 2: These are authentic intelligence memos, official operational logs, and some
frankly terrifying proposals, all confirmed as real by the governments
that created them.
Speaker 1: And that's a real tension here, isn't it. The most
unsettling truths are often found not in what authorities are
trying to hide, but in what they finally admit is
authentic and then just refuse to explain. Welcome to thrilling threads.
We know that if you're listening, you want to be
well informed quickly. But also you know thoroughly. You want
to understand the files that genuinely break the official narrative,
these confirmed oddities that challenge everything we think we know
about history, physics, and even human morality.
Speaker 2: And that is precisely our mission for this deep dive.
We've organized this stack of declassified reports into two main,
and I have to say, deeply unsettling categories. Okay, first,
we're going to look at evidence concerning let's call them
psychological frontiers and non conventional phenomena. These are reports where
reality itself just seems to stop obeying the rules.
Speaker 1: And the second category, the.
Speaker 2: Second category, is in some ways even more chilling. These
are documents that reveal the unbelievable covert plans and capabilities
that were designed and nearly executed by the governments themselves.
Speaker 1: So we're really taking you deep into the archives today,
right into that place where the line between historical fact
and outright science fiction just completely dissolves.
Speaker 2: It really does.
Speaker 1: Let's unpack this, and I think we have to start
with the Cold Wars obsession with the ultimate frontier, the
human mind. The moment we step into the intelligence archives
of the Cold War, I mean, you're in a different world.
It's a place where paranoia just fueled this almost limitless exploration.
Speaker 2: It really did. The operating principle was, if the enemy
might be doing it, we have to do it.
Speaker 1: Better, no matter how absurd it sounds.
Speaker 2: Absolutely regardless of the premise. And that's really the only
way to contextualize the reality of something like Project Stargate.
Speaker 1: So if anyone who hasn't heard of it, what was
Project Stargate?
Speaker 2: Project Stargate was a very real, very classified CIA program
we're talking, primarily housed in the late nineteen seventies and
early nineteen eighties, and it was dedicated to exploring and
well utilizing what they termed remote viewing.
Speaker 1: Which is their technical term for psychic intelligence gathering.
Speaker 2: Basically, that's it in a nutshell, And this wasn't some
backroom experiment with a couple guys. It received significant fun
it was run by serious personnel, and the thousands of
pages confirming its operational existence were later to classified.
Speaker 1: So this was a functioning intelligence operation, not a joke.
Speaker 2: Not at all. But you know, the existence of the
program itself, that's almost historical trivia at this point, right,
what really shifts this whole thing from just history into
let's call it high strangeness. Is one specific operational session.
It's dated nineteen eighty.
Speaker 1: Four, and this is where the file just stops making
any kind of logical sense.
Speaker 2: To an outsider completely. So here's the setup. A remote viewer,
his identity is redacted, of course, but his existence is confirmed,
was given a set of sealed geographical coordinates and he
was just told describe what you perceive instructions very and
the recorded transcript of that session it details a genuinely
mind bending perception. The viewer starts describing these colossal integrated structures,
I mean, architectural complex is on an immense scale.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: He spoke of tall, towering humanoid figures. He described them
as distinctly non terrestrial, and he articulated this this deeply
felt sensation of observing what he himself identified as a
dying or a nearly extinct civilization, which.
Speaker 1: Is already unsettling. I mean, if the coordinates had been
some secret Soviet base or Chinese naval installation, it.
Speaker 2: Would have been filed as operational intelligence, you know, a
success or a failure, but within the realm of the mission.
But that wasn't the target, not even close the actual
target reveal, which was sealed until the session was over.
That's the critical, truly inexplicable detail.
Speaker 1: So what was it?
Speaker 2: The session supervisor revealed The coordinates didn't point anywhere on Earth.
They pointed to the planet Mars, Mars, and not even
Mars as it is now or as it was in
the eighties. The target was Mars specifically approximately one million
years in the past.
Speaker 1: So icy can't wrap my head around that they were
tasking him with what amounts to psychic deep time travel.
Speaker 2: That's what the document says. And I sometimes think about
the kind of institutional gravity you'd need for an intelligence
agency to even conceive of such a target. I mean,
this is an agency dedicated to verifiable, strategic, actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: And here they are focusing on ancient Martian history.
Speaker 2: The transcript goes into even more detail. It describes thin
atmospheric conditions, shelters built directly into the terrain, and observations
of highly intelligent, clearly non human beings who were and
this is a direct quote, actively aware of their own
societal collapse.
Speaker 1: Okay, So in any normal context, a report like that
would be immediately flagged. You'd call it fantasy, a mental breakdown.
Maybe even fabrication.
Speaker 2: It would be quarantined. It would be an outlier, a failure,
flagged for deep deep scrutiny. But the enduring mystery of
this file is its archiabal status.
Speaker 1: Right, the CIA reviewed it, and they did not dismiss
it as a hallucination.
Speaker 2: Not at all. It was archived with the same rigorous classification,
the same sidural seriousness as any other session that might
have targeted you know, real data in Moscow or Beijing.
Speaker 1: So no notes in the margin saying this guy lost.
Speaker 2: It, no notes dismissing the content is unreliable, No official
rebuttal was included.
Speaker 1: Nothing. So when the files were finally declassified around twenty seventeen,
the confirmation was sort of triple layered.
Speaker 2: That's a good way to put it. Layer one, the
target program was real. Layer two, this specific session targeting
ancient Mars was conducted exactly as written, And layer three
the documents detailing this impossible event are authentic official US
government reports.
Speaker 1: And the massive gaping hole in all of this is
the why the agency provided and still provides zero explanation
for why a session targeting deep space and deep time
was commissioned, or conducted or preserved without any kind of rebuttal.
Speaker 2: Why was this treated as potentially actionable intelligence exactly? The
only plausible historical context really is that Cold War anything
goes mentality we mentioned earlier, intelligence analysis is all about
avoiding catastrophic.
Speaker 1: Failure, so they couldn't afford to be wrong.
Speaker 2: Precisely, if there was even a fractional chance that the
Soviets had some kind of psychic technology that could give
them deep strategic insight maybe I don't know historical data
about resource distribution or geological structures, then the US felt
compelled to pursue the same lines of inquiry.
Speaker 1: They had to cover every base, no matter how ridiculous they.
Speaker 2: Had to, and the preservation of the Mars session suggests
that they just couldn't afford the risk of discarding data
that might, in some unknown way prove strategically relevant down
the line.
Speaker 1: So what we're left with is an authentic government document
confirming a completely impossible objective.
Speaker 2: And it forces you to completely redefine what qualifies as
operational data inside those highly secretive walls.
Speaker 1: It is truly unnerving. Now, let's pivot from what the
CIA was doing internally to something bizarre that the CIA
was merely reporting on allegedly sourced from their Soviet counterparts,
the Iberian petrification incident. Right.
Speaker 2: So, this specific and I should say a highly speculative
incident appears in a CIA document compiled during the Cold War.
Speaker 1: And it's important to stress this right, the US never
verified these claims.
Speaker 2: Never. They were allegedly based on intelligence reports that originated
from Soviet sources, probably passed through intermediaries. But the very
fact that it exists in the CIA's highly sensitive files,
that's the enduring question mark here.
Speaker 1: So what does the document claim happened?
Speaker 2: The incidents supposedly took place in a remote, almost unreachable
part of Siberia sometime in the nineteen fifties. According to
the document, local villagers reported seeing a low flying disc
shaped or maybe spherical object that was maneuvering radically and
hovering over the dense forest.
Speaker 1: And of course the Soviets would have sent someone to investigate.
Speaker 2: The report says Soviet military units, and we can probably
assume special forces or internal security were dispatched to the
location to investigate this UFO when they found it. The
document alleges the soldiers, either because of protocol or maybe
just panic, open fire on the object.
Speaker 1: And the object's response.
Speaker 2: In response, the object emitted a sudden, exceptionally intense flash.
Speaker 1: Of light and incomes the really bizarre part, the aftermath.
Speaker 2: The bizarre, almost mythological aftermath. The report states, with just
this alarming lack of any scientific explanation, that the Soviet
soldiers were found turned into a stone like substance.
Speaker 1: So not burned, not dismembered.
Speaker 2: No, the language in the source material specifically suggested a
form of instant complete petrification, which is.
Speaker 1: It's a scientifically impossible.
Speaker 2: Claim, absolutely, And that's exactly why the fact that the
CIA archived it and kept it under high classification for
decades is so telling.
Speaker 1: They didn't verify it, they didn't treat it as fact.
Speaker 2: But and this is the crucial analytical detail, they also
didn't explicitly mark it as disinformation. It wasn't labeled a
fabrication or a low credibility hoax.
Speaker 1: So what does that tell us about how intelligence analysis works?
Why would you waste sensitive file space on what sounds
like a sci fi horror story.
Speaker 2: Well, it really illustrates the nature of threat modeling during
the Cold War. Like I said, intelligence organizations, they save
everything but the lack of that hoax a label implies
something important. What's that it implies the analysts couldn't immediately
rule out the possibility that the Soviet Union was either
covering up some kind of catastrophic, unknown technological failure or
something worse, or even more alarmingly, that they were actually
developing a weapon system capable of producing effects that seemed
to violate the known laws of physics.
Speaker 1: So the analyst feared that dismissing this strange report might
mean missing some new, bizarre strategic capability the enemy was developing.
Speaker 2: Exactly, It's less about confirming that soldiers actually turned to Stone,
and more about confirming that the Soviets had a file
about soldiers turning to Stone.
Speaker 1: That institutional decision to lock up this unverified, impossible event
as a matter of sensitive intelligence. It really speaks volumes
about the paranoia of the time.
Speaker 2: It does lip liies that for a period a secret
US file acknowledged the possibility of reality itself being weaponized.
Speaker 1: Okay, if that first section dealt with files that challenged
the frontiers of the mind and speculative intelligence, this next
section moves as squarely into documented physical reality.
Speaker 2: Yes, we're talking about phenomena captured by hard censored data
multiple military eyewitnesses, where the objects involved display characteristics that
simply defy classical physics and all known aerospace engineering.
Speaker 1: And we have to start with a cornerstone of documented
military UAP encounters. This one is backed by a verifiable,
official military memo, the Rendelsham Forest incident.
Speaker 2: This took place in December of nineteen eighty near two
US Air Force bases in Suffolk, England, RAF Bentwaters and
RAF Woodbridge.
Speaker 1: Now, the initial public response to these reports of strange
lights descending into the forest, it was pretty predictable.
Speaker 2: Right, oh, completely, It was a simple swift dismissal, you know,
is attributed to a nearby lighthouse or maybe stray meteors,
the usual explanations.
Speaker 1: But the truth started to come out years later, and
it came out in the form of a memorandum written
by the deputy base commander, Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt.
Speaker 2: The Halt Memo is the smoking gun here because it's
an official, verifiable military document that details the event from
a command perspective.
Speaker 1: And what does it say.
Speaker 2: Halt describes his team going out to investigate a glowing
metallic object that was maneuvering silently through the dense cluster
of trees. This wasn't just a static light in the
sky now.
Speaker 1: It was a physical object performing sophisticated levers exactly.
Speaker 2: Furthermore, the memo records that this object emitted intense beams
of light, shining them down onto the forest floor. And
later the team observed the object ascend rapidly and split
into five distinct airborne.
Speaker 1: Entities, and then they were gone.
Speaker 2: A high speed exit from the area.
Speaker 1: Yes, but the crucial part, the thing that elevates this
beyond just a really compelling eyewitness account is the physical data.
Speaker 2: That's the key. The memo explicitly detailed that radiation readings
were taken at the alleged landing site, and.
Speaker 1: These readings were officially recorded as being above background levels in.
Speaker 2: Three specific depressions that they found in the ground.
Speaker 1: Yes, so when the Halt memo was finally declassified and released,
the US military couldn't really deny it.
Speaker 2: They couldn't, and they didn't. They never disputed its authenticity.
It's a genuine, authenticated military log signed by a high
ranking officer.
Speaker 1: So what was their official statement?
Speaker 2: Their public statement was an absolute masterpiece of strategic silence.
They merely concluded that no threat was identified.
Speaker 1: That is the ultimate institutional dodge. It's a pattern we
see over and over again.
Speaker 2: It is the official record confirms an object that maneuvers impossibly,
It confirms it left physical, quantifiable evidence those radiation spikes,
and then they just shrug and conclude it poses no threat.
Speaker 1: It leaves the biggest questions just hanging there. What caused
the radiation spikes? What was the object?
Speaker 2: By confirming the data but dismissing the significance, the military
is essentially confirming that they detected an advanced non conventional
presence in highly restricted airspace and they simply cannot account
for it.
Speaker 1: And that pattern of internal confirmation followed by a public dismissal,
it basically became institutional policy. We see it very clearly.
Speaker 2: In the UK, which brings us to the declassification of
the UK Ministry of Defense or mad UFO files. This
happened between twenty eight and twenty.
Speaker 1: Thirteen, and for years the UK government had officially denied
they took any of this seriously.
Speaker 2: They did, but under significant public pressure freedom of information requests,
they were finally compelled to release over one hundred and
fifty thousand pages of internal reports and analyzes.
Speaker 1: And that release allowed people to compare what they were
saying internally versus what they were saying publicly.
Speaker 2: And the contradiction is profound. Internally, mod analysts repeatedly acknowledged
sightings of objects displaying well acceleration, maneuverability, and stealth capabilities
that were demonstrably beyond anything in the UK's inventory or
any known adversarial nations inventory.
Speaker 1: So the memos that were only meant for internal eyes
for threat assessment they said something very different.
Speaker 2: They explicitly stated that some sightings could not be attributed
to conventional aircraft, known atmospheric phenomena or censor errors. That right,
there is internal acceptance of impossible performance characteristics.
Speaker 1: They had physical proof of technology beyond their comprehension operating
in their sovereign airspace.
Speaker 2: Yes, and yet despite these deeply unsettling internal findings, the
ultimate public conclusion the MAD delivered was one of let's
call it, deliberate ambiguity.
Speaker 1: They formally stated that UFOs posed no known threat to
UK defenses and therefore were not worth for their official study.
Speaker 2: The depth of that contradiction is a stunning political choice.
How can you internally acknowledge the existence of impossible physics
technology that could literally redefine global power and then publicly
conclude it's not worth studying.
Speaker 1: It suggests one or two things, right think.
Speaker 2: So, either they already know exactly what these things are
and have a strategic reason to maintain this institutional.
Speaker 1: Denial, or and this may be more frightening.
Speaker 2: Or they genuinely cannot identify the source and have calculated
that it is less to stabilizing to just ignore the
phenomenon than to publicly admit they can't control or explain
what's happening in their own airspace.
Speaker 1: So the files prove the institution recognized the reality of it,
but they strategically denied its significance.
Speaker 2: And this strategic denial brings us right up to the
modern day to the most contemporary and highly documented version
of this paradox, the US Navy UAP encounters.
Speaker 1: And these are not historical anomalies from the eighties. These
are recent, and in some cases routine events.
Speaker 2: We're discussing encounters documented routinely between twenty four and twenty fifteen,
often happening right near US military training zones. Off the
Pacific coast.
Speaker 1: And the evidence base for these is just overwhelming. It is.
Speaker 2: It includes radar logs from advanced AGIS systems, corroborating report
words from multiple trained military pilots, high resolution infra red footage,
and even high level internal Navy briefings.
Speaker 1: But what's really revolutionary about these declassified documents is the
consistent description of performance metrics that are not just advanced,
they fundamentally violate known aeros based engineering principles.
Speaker 2: Let's actually detail the impossibility of the actions that were
witnessed and recorded.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's start with acceleration. What were the pilots reporting.
Speaker 2: They reported objects instantaneously dropping from altitudes of eighty thousand feet,
where the air is incredibly thin and cold, down to
sea level in just a matter of seconds. If any
conventional plane tried that, the sheer aerodynamic friction generated at
those speeds would instantly vaporize the metal. It wouldn't survive, not.
Speaker 1: To mention the G forces.
Speaker 2: The G forces involved in that kind of sudden, violent
deceleration would instantly liquidate any known human pilot. It would
probably shatter the structural integrity of the most brasilient unmanned drone.
We are talking about forces that exceed human tolerance by
several orders of magnitude, and.
Speaker 1: The UAPs demonstrated this capability with no visible means of propulsion,
no wings, no engines, and.
Speaker 2: The defiance of thermodynamics and gravity just continues. The objects
were reported to hover perfectly still, just sitting there, defying gravity,
yet generating zero detectable heat plumes and showing zero visible
means of lift.
Speaker 1: So no jets, no rockets, not even helicopter blades. Nothing.
Speaker 2: And then there is the speed. They were tracked, traveling
at hypersonic velocities, often exceeding mock five times the speed
of sound.
Speaker 1: But critically, they produce no sonic boom.
Speaker 2: And that's not an optional byproduct of speed. A sonic
boom is an inescapable consequence of displacing air faster than
the speed of sound.
Speaker 1: So to move that fast without a boom implies a
technology that is somehow manipulating or canceling the physics of
air displacement around the craft.
Speaker 2: That's the only logical conclusion and the most unsettling reports,
particularly the ones from the Nimtz Carrier Group incidents, they
involved the objects appearing to drop directly into the ocean
without slowing down.
Speaker 1: Any airframe hitting water at that speed would just disintegrate
into shrapnel.
Speaker 2: But these UAPs transition seamlessly from the air to the
marine environment. It implies a kind of propulsion and material
science that is radically beyond anything we currently understand.
Speaker 1: And the reports confirmed this wasn't an isolated incident. This
was happening sometimes daily for years near major military training complexes.
Speaker 2: This level of activity, frequency and impossible performance, it represents
a profound, sustained operational security breach, And.
Speaker 1: Once again the official response follows that familiar pattern we
saw with Rendelsham and the ukme out exactly.
Speaker 2: The Pentagon confirmed the footage was authentic. They formally labeled
them Unidentified Aerial Phenomena UAPs, and the most crucial detail
of all.
Speaker 1: They did not deny that the objects were under intelligent control.
Speaker 2: They released the evidence that they confirmed the physics were broken.
They confirmed the objects were operating within a highly restricted
US military zones, but they offered zero identification.
Speaker 1: So the common thread uniting the psychic Mars session and
the radar data of the tic TAC UAPs, it's the
official institutional confirmation of authentic but inexplicable data.
Speaker 2: Governments are confirming that reality is fundamentally weirder than we think,
and then they engage in strategic silence about what it
all means.
Speaker 1: Okay, if the first two sections dealt with phenomena that
stretched the limits of science, this next category of declassified documents,
it reveals something far more immediate and honestly disturbing. Yeah.
Speaker 2: These are the confirmed plans and capabilities designed by governments themselves,
actions that defy all reasonable ethics and accountability.
Speaker 1: These are files that show us the truly terrifying things
our leaders were willing to conceive of and in some
cases execute against their own people or rivals.
Speaker 2: And we absolutely must begin this section with what many
historians consider one of the most profoundly disturbing documents ever
declassified by the US govern Operation Northwoods.
Speaker 1: This was an official classified proposal drafted in nineteen sixty
two by WHO.
Speaker 2: By the US Department of Defense, and its aim was
to create public and international justification for a full scale
military invasion of Fidel Castro's Cuba.
Speaker 1: It's the methodology proposed within Northwoods that is just so chilling.
Speaker 2: It is it outlined a series of sophisticated, deadly false
flag operations. They were designed to be executed by US
military and intelligence assets, but with the express purpose of
making it look like Cuban forces were responsible for all
the violence and chaos.
Speaker 1: And let's get specific about the tactics they outlined, because
they were deeply unethical.
Speaker 2: Oh there were. The plan included staging acts of terrorism
in American cities. It proposed sinking boats that were carrying
Cuban refugees fleeing to Florida, an act that would guarantee
the murder of innocent civilians, designed explicitly to generate outrage.
Speaker 1: They also detailed plans for hijacking US commercial aircraft.
Speaker 2: Yes, creating manufactured crises in major media outlets, and even
staging military attacks on US facilities, specifically targeting the naval
base at Guantanamo Bay.
Speaker 1: I mean, I often think about the concept of a
pretext for war. This document is the ultimate instruction manual
for manufacturing a pretext.
Speaker 2: But what gives Northwoods its terrifying historical weight isn't just
the content, it's the signatures exactly.
Speaker 1: This wasn't some fringe idea dreamed up by a low
level analyst in a basement somewhere.
Speaker 2: Not at all. The document was officially signed by General
Lyman Lemnitzer, who was the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff.
Speaker 1: The highest ranking military officer in the.
Speaker 2: Country, which means it had been vetted, it was formalized,
and it reached the absolute highest levels of military command
for approval by the Secretary of Defense and ultimately the President.
Speaker 1: Thankfully, President John F. Kennedy rejected the plan outright. He
prevented its implementation.
Speaker 2: He did, but the report, which was classified for decades
until it was released in the nineteen nineties, was confirmed
by officials as being entirely real. It was an accurate
representation of proposed actions.
Speaker 1: And the lasting chilling question is not just that it
was proposed, but how close this extreme, deadly plan to
intentionally murder American civilians and military personnel and blame it
on a foreign adversary, how close that came to being approved.
Speaker 2: The document exists as factual, historical proof that the highest
echelon of the US military establishment had both the capacity
and the willingness to use mass murder and deceit as
a core mechanism of foreign policy.
Speaker 1: And the fact that no adequate explanation or high level
accountability was ever issued for its conception, only that it
was rejected. It just leaves this enormous gap in public understanding.
Speaker 2: It's a gap an understanding governmental ethical restraint or the
lack thereof during that period. It just shows the danger
of contingency planning when it's divorced from any kind of
ethical oversight.
Speaker 1: When you realize that such calculated, systematic deceit was formalized
and signed off on by the most senior military officer
in the country, it forces you to question the foundations
of every conflict that followed.
Speaker 2: It really does.
Speaker 1: And speaking of terrifying capabilities confirmed be real, let's pivot
to a weapon that sounds like something out of pure
fiction but was unveiled as stark reality, the CIA's heart
attack gun.
Speaker 2: This disclosure happened in nineteen seventy five during the Senate
investigation known as the Church Committee.
Speaker 1: Right, and that committee was tasked with investigating widespread abuses
and misuses of power by US intelligence agencies.
Speaker 2: Exactly and under direct legal compulsion, the CIA was forced
to disclose several of their most tightly held covert assassination
tools and operational methods and.
Speaker 1: Among those tools was this specialized weapon designed for the
perfect deniable assassination.
Speaker 2: It was developed to fire a minuscule frozen dart. Reports
say it was made of a specialized shelfish toxin derived
from paralyzing agents.
Speaker 1: The horror of it is in the mechanism's elegance.
Speaker 2: It really is. The dart was designed to be frozen
and fired silently, often from a specialized compact pistol. Upon
penetrating the target's skin, which it could do through clothing,
the dart would dissolve almost instantly into the.
Speaker 1: Bloodstream, leaving no external wound, no foreign object, nothing.
Speaker 2: And the specialized toxin was precisely calibrated to induce immediate
cardiac arrest, perfectly mimicking a natural heart attack.
Speaker 1: So you can see the tactical and investigative nightmare this creates.
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely, if the target was a healthy, middle aged
man who suddenly collapsed and died, an autopsy would show
no signs of physical trauma, no foreign object, and no
immediately detectable common poison.
Speaker 1: The cause of death would almost certainly be recorded as
a natural myocardial infarction, a heart attack.
Speaker 2: And the CIA didn't just talk about this weapon. They
admitted it existed, they demonstrated its function to the committee,
and they confirmed it had been tested on animals, proving
its efficacy.
Speaker 1: So those facts existence, demonstration, testing, that's all declassified it is.
Speaker 2: But here's the critical lingering classified blank. The one question
that still remains sealed and protected by national security classification
is whether the weapon was ever actually used, whether it
was ever used for human assassination in an operational.
Speaker 1: Setting, and the fact that the agency is still so
aggressively protecting that information. What does that suggest.
Speaker 2: Well, it suggests either that the answer is a confirmed
yes and releasing those details would cause severe political damage,
or that the capability itself is still considered current and
strategically too sensitive to acknowledge publicly.
Speaker 1: An untraceable weapon of state, it's maybe the most difficult
government's secret to reconcile it is.
Speaker 2: It's the ultimate ethical gray area, confirmed to be real,
yet its actual historical impact is still hidden behind that
veil of secrecy.
Speaker 1: Let's move on to a file that was revealed entirely
by accident and speaks volumes about international cooperation in highly
sensitive non conventional intelligence. The Australian US Joined Operations Puzzle right.
Speaker 2: This centers on a classified Australian defense and intelligence report
that was compiled in nineteen seventy one.
Speaker 1: And on the surface, what did it detail.
Speaker 2: It meticulously detailed joint aerial surveillance, intelligence sharing protocols and
even specific encounters with unidentified objects being tracked in partnership
with the United States, So it seemed.
Speaker 1: Like standard operational communication, but it contained several major analytical
red flags.
Speaker 2: It did it referenced highly restricted projects and tracking systems
that were not meant for general intelligence acknowledgment. But crucially,
it contained repeated references to recoveries and specialized access programs.
Speaker 1: And as an analyst, when you see a word like
recoveries in a defense document, what does that mean?
Speaker 2: You immediately understand you've crossed the line into deeply compartmentalized,
highly restricted intelligence operations. That terminology is often associated with
retrieving non conventional materials or technology.
Speaker 1: What researchers often speculate are crash retrievals.
Speaker 2: Crash retrievals were highly sensitive pro prietary technical data transfers.
Speaker 1: Yes, so the clear implication was that Australia, a key
US ally, was actively involved in sensitive activities with the
US that went far beyond simple observation or reporting.
Speaker 2: It suggested a high level, decades long awareness of programs
that at the time the US was publicly denying even existed.
Speaker 1: And the element of chance and how this came out
is just staggering.
Speaker 2: It is decades after its creation, the document was accidentally
included in a batch of routine declassified records and archived
publicly in the national records system.
Speaker 1: And once its true contents and particularly those key phrases
were discovered by independent researchers, Australian officials immediately tried to
reclassify it.
Speaker 2: They did, citing extreme national security concerns.
Speaker 1: But the horse was already out of the barn.
Speaker 2: The file was cataloged, copied, and preserved in public records,
and to this day, no official clarification, no correction, no
explanation has ever been issued regarding the meaning or scope
of those specific references to recoveries and specialized access programs.
Speaker 1: So the subsequent silence and that desperate attempt to reclassify it,
that just serves as institutional confirmation of its intense sensitivity.
Speaker 2: Exactly whatever those joint programs entailed, whether it was non
conventional material analysis or shared classified technology, they remain too
sensitive for the public to know, even though the document
confirming their existence is now permanently in the public domain.
Speaker 1: It's a classic case of confirming a secret and confirming
that the secret matters without ever explaining the secret itself.
Speaker 2: And that brings us to our final section, which takes
us to the absolute extreme of national security.
Speaker 1: Files dealing with nuclear weapons, global destruction, and the tracking
of materials designed for mutual annihilation. These documents reveal systems
engineered for the end of the world and some alarming
failures and accountability that persist to this day.
Speaker 2: We have to begin with what is arguably the most
profoundly dangerous engineers hearing feet of the Cold War, the
ultimate automated response system developed by the Soviet.
Speaker 1: Union, internally known as Perimeter and.
Speaker 2: Chillingly referred to in the West as the dead Hand system.
Speaker 1: So this was the nuclear fail safe design for the
very end of days.
Speaker 2: Yes. The concept was if the centralized Soviet leadership, the
entire command structure was suddenly and completely wiped out in
a nuclear strike, rendering them unable to order a retaliation,
this system was designed to automatically trigger a full nuclear counterstrike.
Speaker 1: Ensuring mutual destruction no matter.
Speaker 2: What, regardless of human survival, and the mechanism relied on
a sophisticated interlocking network of sensors.
Speaker 1: What was it looking for.
Speaker 2: It was designed to detect a set of highly specific
conditions that would confirm the decapitation of the command structure.
Things like sudden, widespread synchronized radiation spikes across Soviet territory,
massive seismic activity from multiple large scale impacts, widespread simultaneous
communication blackouts across command and control nodes, and large scale
atmospheric pressure changes consistent with nuclear detonations.
Speaker 1: And here is the terrifying unique characteristic that sets Perimeter
apart from standard nuclear deterrent systems.
Speaker 2: If those specific conditions were met and the network confirmed
the destruction of command, the system required no human approval,
not at all. It was designed to automatically authorize and
launch the entire Soviet nuclear arsenal, based solely on pre
programmed logic. It was entirely autonomous from the human chain
of command.
Speaker 1: This takes the concept of mutually sured destruction and just
places it into the hands of a machine algorithm.
Speaker 2: It guaranteed destruction even if every single human controller was vaporized. Furthermore,
officials who later discussed the system admitted that once though
stringent activation conditions were met, the process was extremely difficult,
perhaps even impossible, to abort or shut down, and.
Speaker 1: We learned about this after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Speaker 2: Yes, details were declassified piece mail, with Russian officials confirming
the system had been operational for years, but the unexplained
danger remains. The public has never been given the logs
detailing how often and how close the world came to
disaster because of false sensor readings or technical malfunctions.
Speaker 1: The sheer complexity of those triggers meant there were countless
opportunities for failure.
Speaker 2: We know from other documented Cold War incidents, like the
famous nineteen eighty three incident with the Soviet officer Stanislav Petrov,
that ambiguous radar readings or minor seismic events often led
to minutes of excruciating global tension.
Speaker 1: But we don't have the perimeter logs.
Speaker 2: We don't and the implication is that for years, global
annihilation was potentially one massive geomagnetic storm, one major earthquake,
or one misinterpreted sensor reading away from being initiated. By
a robotic failsafe.
Speaker 1: A computer algorithm designed to end the human era based
on a digital checklist.
Speaker 2: It really underscores the profound existential risk inherent in autonomous,
high stakes military systems. Straits a state's commitment to guarantee
the end of the world based on pure logic without
a human safety net.
Speaker 1: And if perimeter speaks to a failure of design and control,
our final collection of files speaks to a failure of
accountability in tracking the enduring problem of missing nuclear material.
Speaker 2: Right throughout the Cold War, governments like the US and
the Soviet Union tracked every gram of highly enriched uranium,
plutonium and weapons components with almost obsessive precision.
Speaker 1: Yet despite that rigor, numerous classified reports were filed about
missing or unaccounted for material that just vanished from inventory.
Speaker 2: Now, some of these incidents were certainly tragic, but you know, explicable.
They involved transportation accidents, lost shipments, or known military aircraft
crashes where warheads or sensitive components were jettisoned into remote
areas or lost at sea, like.
Speaker 1: The famous B fifty two crashes over Palomari's Spain or
Thull the Greenland in the sixties.
Speaker 2: Exactly, but others were far more difficult to explain. They
represented inventory discrepancies, security breaches, or outright thefts that remained
unresolved for decades, and.
Speaker 1: When portions of these highly sensitive reports were finally declassified,
they revealed some alarming gaps that were never officially closed.
Speaker 2: Specifically, in several documented cases confirmed by the US General
Accounting Office and internal military reports, accountable quantities of weapons
grade nuclear material plutonium or highly enriched uranium were officially
listed as missing with no confirmed subsequent recovery. And we
are not talking about paperwork errors here, No, we are
talking about material capable of being used to construct a
sophisticated radiological dispersal device, a dirty bomb, or potentially even
a crude nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: And there were other reports too, right, documenting unexplained radiation.
Speaker 2: Spikes, yes, localized radiation spikes detected in locations where no
known weapons were deployed, tested, or stored. These were events
that strongly suggested illicit activity, accidental dispersion, or unauthorized secret storage, and.
Speaker 1: The government's use of strategic silence is again the defining
character risicure.
Speaker 2: The declassified files often ended abruptly or they were concluded
with vague, noncommittal language stating that investigations were inconclusive or ongoing.
In numerous other instances, the files just stopped with no
stated conclusion at.
Speaker 1: All, leaving the question just hanging permanently in the public record.
Speaker 2: And when pressed by journalists and oversight bodies, the governments
involved have systematically declined to comment on these specific gaps,
citing the highest levels of national security.
Speaker 1: So the threat remains profoundly unanswered to this day.
Speaker 2: There is no complete, publicly validated accounting of every reported
loss or unexplained radiation event involving sensitive nuclear material from
the Cold War era.
Speaker 1: So what we're left with are documented, verified government files
confirming that dangerous nuclear material went missing, material that could
potentially still be unsecured today, and we have no official
explanation of where it went or if the threat was
ever permanently mitigated.
Speaker 2: It is an open ended existential threat, confirmed by the
very government sworn to protect us.
Speaker 1: So this journey through these declassified archives, from the psychological
frontiers of Stargate to the deadly capabilities of the heart
attack gun and the impossible physics of the UAPs, it
all leads us to one critical synthesis I think so.
Speaker 2: The common thread in all ten of these files is
not necessarily a single, unifying global conspiracy. It's more about
the jarring institutional reality that official history, even after the
required declassification period, remains just riddled with contradictions, unexplained physical impossibilities,
and systemic gaps and accountability.
Speaker 1: These are official documents confirming the authentication of impossible events,
terrifying plans, and profound organizational risk.
Speaker 2: And for you, the well informed learner, this means that
gaining true insight requires you to engage with the things
we don't know. These documents are definitive proof that the
most fascinating and vital secrets aren't about what is hidden
from us.
Speaker 1: It's about what the authorities confirm is real, and then,
for resasons that are either strategic or simply incomprehensible, refuse
to explain or integrate into the public narrative.
Speaker 2: It's a huge point if the state confirms the authenticity
of documents detailing untraceable assassination weapons or plans for war
based on deadly lies or physical objects that defy ore
understanding of energy and propulsion, but then provides no crucial
why or what happened next.
Speaker 1: How can the public accurately assess global threats or trust
any official narrative regarding technology or military readiness.
Speaker 2: You can't, and the very nature of official secrecy means
that the fragment of information we do receive the details
of the Halt Memo, the Northwood's proposal. The confirmed performance
metrics of the UAPs is often the most revealing, precisely
because it was never intended for our eyes.
Speaker 1: It forces us to question the stability of the entire
historical and scientific.
Speaker 2: Record, which leads us to one final provocative thought, based
on all the highly detailed material we have synthesized for
you today, if you look at these ten confirmed realities,
you have to ask.
Speaker 1: Yourself which of these documented mysteries, the psychic session targeting
ancient Mars, the confirmed existence and potential use of the
untraceable heart attack gun, or the herd sensored data detailing
the impossible physics of the hypersonic navy UAPs do you
think pos is the most uncomfortable, most fundamental question about
the true technological capabilities and hidden history of our world.
Speaker 2: We really want to know what you think. Please share
your thoughts below and let's continue this deep discussion.
Speaker 1: We will catch you in the next thrilling threads