Speaker 1: Good evening, folks. It is Saturday and you are watching
Speaker 1: the nonprofits. This is our last segment for this week,
Speaker 1: and we are going to discuss something that I would
Speaker 1: consider delusional if I were to refer to yesterday's segment.
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody can present this next article without
Speaker 1: uncovering some delusion. But who cares what I think? Kelly
Speaker 1: Loughlett is here to take us away. Kelly.
Speaker 2: Thanks. Jimmy, you know, the leader of the infamous Focus
Speaker 2: on Family, Jim Daly, has written a hit piece on
Speaker 2: the left for Fox News. In a gloating diatribe, he
Speaker 2: claims the left is just a bunch of whiners that
Speaker 2: can't get over losing the election. But as I recall,
Speaker 2: it was the right that had more hysterical fits than
Speaker 2: I see coming from the left today, including still four
Speaker 2: years later, claiming the election was stolen, without of course,
Speaker 2: providing any proof to.
Speaker 3: Back that up.
Speaker 2: Now, when mister Daly seems to have forgotten is that
Speaker 2: this country is for all Americans, not just Christian nationalists.
Speaker 2: And as he revels in his victory, he characterizes the
Speaker 2: left as crazy and unhinged. But what it seems like
Speaker 2: he's really saying is screw all you people if you
Speaker 2: aren't a Christian, because we are in power now and
Speaker 2: we will use the government to steamroll a religious right agenda,
Speaker 2: and there's nothing you can do about it if you
Speaker 2: have other religious beliefs or non beliefs. This story is
Speaker 2: as I said by Jim Dailey from Fox News, published
Speaker 2: November seventeenth, twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1: Yeah, excellent. You know, I see a lot of similarities
Speaker 1: between this article and the article that we covered earlier
Speaker 1: this week on Monday, Kelly, you brought it up and
Speaker 1: nailed it. You know, this guy threatening to steamroll democratic
Speaker 1: policies or democratic you know, sectors of the government with
Speaker 1: a right wing agenda. You know, we saw that affecting
Speaker 1: the education system. And when I said that on Monday,
Speaker 1: I said, man, I have to chuckle any time I
Speaker 1: see somebody on the right, you know, having a problem
Speaker 1: with LGBTQ or gender studies. And in the same token,
Speaker 1: again we find ourselves saying to members on the right,
Speaker 1: are you out of your mind? Calling the left hysterical?
Speaker 1: Nobody's making gallows or taking a crap on a desk
Speaker 1: in the Capitol building that they forced their way into
Speaker 1: right and so you know, I have to wonder is
Speaker 1: this just more delusion? And you know, Aaron, I want
Speaker 1: to start with you, in the context of this article,
Speaker 1: in the context of the election that we went through
Speaker 1: and the change that we're about to see, do some
Speaker 1: Americans have a right to be hysterical?
Speaker 4: Absolutely, I think they have a right to be hysterical.
Speaker 4: This this election was not for the for the people
Speaker 4: that are hysterical, for the liberal tiers that are being shed.
Speaker 4: It's not about the fucking policies. It's not about the
Speaker 4: fucking platforms, right, It's about patriotism to our constitution and
Speaker 4: loyalty to the rule of law. What happened was so
Speaker 4: far beyond policies. There's On a recent episode of Last
Speaker 4: Week Tonight with John Oliver, John Oliver made the joke
Speaker 4: that right now, talking about policies is a little like
Speaker 4: trying to choose a paint color for your walls while
Speaker 4: your house is burning down. That's where all the liberal
Speaker 4: hysterical tiers are coming from, is the fact that we
Speaker 4: just elected someone who blatantly broke his vow to protect
Speaker 4: and defend the constitution and the rule of law.
Speaker 2: That has pour gas all over and holding the match
Speaker 2: to burn the house down, That.
Speaker 4: Literally tried to get his vice president killed, That literally
Speaker 4: tried to ask his vice president to overturn the results
Speaker 4: of a fair and secure election, and has spread lies
Speaker 4: to such an extent that one third of Americans believe
Speaker 4: the twenty twenty election was stolen when there's no evidence
Speaker 4: that it was stolen. That's where the liberal tiers are
Speaker 4: coming from. It's not about policies. It's about the loss
Speaker 4: of liberty. It's about the loss of individual freedom. It's
Speaker 4: about the loss of the Constitution, which ushered in an
Speaker 4: era of democracy and peace into the world. It's about
Speaker 4: disregarding for that. Where people decided, well, I don't think
Speaker 4: the rule of law is that important. I think the
Speaker 4: economy is more important. I think these policies are more important.
Speaker 4: That's where people are hysterical, in my opinion. That's where
Speaker 4: I was at. That's what really hurt me was just
Speaker 4: the lack of disregard for the Constitution and the rule
Speaker 4: of law that this election demonstrated. Honestly, I honestly I
Speaker 4: never thought Trump would ever get elected again, just for
Speaker 4: that reason. I always thought, Hey, you know what, I
Speaker 4: understood why people wanted to give him a chance in
Speaker 4: twenty sixteen. Sure, I understood, Hey, a new guy, an
Speaker 4: outsider i'd interview with his policies, so let's give him
Speaker 4: a chance. But he's so clearly demonstrated through gotcha. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: I mean I can't believe it.
Speaker 1: I think, yeah, I and and maybe you're even a
Speaker 1: little bit hysterical right now. And I think you have
Speaker 1: a right to be. And it's not just the Constitution
Speaker 1: that I think people are concerned about, although that is,
Speaker 1: if you had a single issue that you that you
Speaker 1: were concerned about the Constitution or the disregard the lack
Speaker 1: of regard that Aaron mentioned is certainly a good enough
Speaker 1: reason to be concerned. But I mean, let's talk about
Speaker 1: all of the other laws. You know, there's uh, there
Speaker 1: were felonies, right there were there were that we have
Speaker 1: for the first time in our history a president elect
Speaker 1: who is a convicted felon and was found liable for
Speaker 1: sexual assault. These are alarming, alarming for a lot of
Speaker 1: Americans from all walks of life. And so, uh yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that for people on the right to point
Speaker 1: the finger at h at left leftists quote unquote, uh,
Speaker 1: for for having a concern over the rule of law
Speaker 1: being violated when the people on the right actively violated
Speaker 1: the law for the reasons that they're accusing the left
Speaker 1: of is complete hypocrisy. And you know, I think I
Speaker 1: want to go to Kelly about this because I know
Speaker 1: you you introduced the article right, and you covered it
Speaker 1: a little bit. But you know, my first thought was,
Speaker 1: wait a minute. Conservatives don't get upset when their candidate loses.
Speaker 1: I mean, what what the hell am I missing? And Kelly,
Speaker 1: could you please expand on that.
Speaker 2: Oh, they don't even need to have their candidate lose.
Speaker 2: They can get upset about all kinds of crazy things.
Speaker 2: I think the author forgot about everyone's shooting bud light cans,
Speaker 2: burning their nikes, beating their curags with a baseball bet.
Speaker 2: Those are all things I remember the right doing, just
Speaker 2: over a stuff that they didn't like. Oh my god,
Speaker 2: Nike came out and said that LGBTQ people were, Okay,
Speaker 2: let's burn our shoe. I mean, people, why would you
Speaker 2: burn something that you already spent money in? How is
Speaker 2: that hurning Nike company? It doesn't make any sense at all.
Speaker 2: It reminded me of the sixties when Beatles sit record
Speaker 2: sales went up so high because people were buying them
Speaker 2: just to burn them at church. So I don't it
Speaker 2: just seems to didn't.
Speaker 1: I did not know that.
Speaker 2: Yo, you didn't know. Yeah, that actually happened. And one
Speaker 2: of the things that really got me about this was
Speaker 2: that the author decides to quote two Democrats, only two
Speaker 2: that he can find, and one is totally embroiled in
Speaker 2: ethical issues and honestly, if he had ran back in
Speaker 2: say nineteen eighty, he would have been a Republican. And
Speaker 2: the other one only disagrees with the left on one issue,
Speaker 2: one issue, only trans rights, and that issue is and
Speaker 2: what he said is is that issue is hurting the
Speaker 2: Democrats at the ballot box. He didn't say he was
Speaker 2: against trans rights, just that it was hurting Democrats at
Speaker 2: the ballot box. So yeah, go ahead. I didn't say.
Speaker 2: He does quote one other person, Chuck Coulson.
Speaker 3: Oh.
Speaker 2: I don't know if anybody knows who Chuck Coulson was.
Speaker 2: He was Nixon's hatchet man with the prison over the
Speaker 2: water Gate scandal. So I think it's really funny that like,
Speaker 2: of the three people he quotes, one really doesn't agree
Speaker 2: with him, and the other two are apparently criminals. So
Speaker 2: you think he could find better people to prove his point.
Speaker 1: Right, Well, yeah, you know, there's a lot of I
Speaker 1: think there are a lot of criminals that the right
Speaker 1: can point to nowadays, right, especially with some cabinet picks,
Speaker 1: people who just came out of jail, people who have
Speaker 1: problems with sexual assault. I don't know how you could
Speaker 1: have that problem and still be considered for a cabinet,
Speaker 1: let alone be elected to office. But that is a
Speaker 1: kind of a different Again, you can get.
Speaker 2: Drunk at work and be in charge of the button.
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, right, So we are in a bit of
Speaker 1: a debacle. And as we have talked about in you know,
Speaker 1: we talk about all the time on this show, but
Speaker 1: as we have talked about earlier in this week, the
Speaker 1: relationship between religion and government. You know, I want to
Speaker 1: turn to Eli and his opinion about secular and religious beliefs.
Speaker 1: You mentioned, you know, leading up to this show, that
Speaker 1: secular religious beliefs do have the same cognitive foundation. So
Speaker 1: I want to unpack that a little, see if you
Speaker 1: want to expand.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so, and that kind of that's just a remnant
Speaker 3: from yesterday's show where we talked about beliefs and delusions
Speaker 3: basically come from the same place in our brain. So,
Speaker 3: you know, Daly says here at one point, you know,
Speaker 3: from abortion fanaticism to policies that celebrate sexual confusion. Radicals
Speaker 3: practice their political ideology with religious zeal and fervor basically
Speaker 3: comparing secular like saying a well, secularism as a religion too.
Speaker 3: And so what, you know, what you're referring to is
Speaker 3: where we know that based on kind of what we
Speaker 3: learned yesterday about beliefs having the same origin, whether they're
Speaker 3: true or delusional, secular and religious beliefs do have the
Speaker 3: same cognitive origin or foundation, but one of them is
Speaker 3: lacking a critical ingredient or supplement, and that is, you know,
Speaker 3: experimental evidence or like just some objectively true thing to
Speaker 3: like support it. So when you have things like you know,
Speaker 3: he says, I mean, and he says things like the
Speaker 3: reason you are upset because you know, upset about your
Speaker 3: candidate losing, or the reason you're upset about the election
Speaker 3: result is because you're not close enough to God, not
Speaker 3: because like you're part of a marginalized group that is,
Speaker 3: you know, constantly being targeted by you know, this party
Speaker 3: that now has complete control over all three branches. Not
Speaker 3: because your healthcare is at risk of you're at risk
Speaker 3: of losing access to healthcare, not because you know you're
Speaker 3: homosexual and you you know, enjoy being married and you know,
Speaker 3: living your life and just being the person that you are,
Speaker 3: but just because you're not focused on God enough. And
Speaker 3: it's it's this idea that he's saying that all of
Speaker 3: those things are not important, like it those things just
Speaker 3: don't matter that like you're saying that that's why you're
Speaker 3: upset about.
Speaker 1: The election or the results.
Speaker 3: Are the reasons that Aaron gave were very I hadn't
Speaker 3: even thought of, but some valid reasons as well. And
Speaker 3: what Daly is saying is like, that's what you're telling
Speaker 3: us is the reason, but the real reason is because
Speaker 3: you don't love Jesus enough. And I think that is
Speaker 3: absolutely delusional.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, there are some other delusions too. I mean,
Speaker 1: the the right for some reason, thinks that the left
Speaker 1: has a trans agenda, that their plan is to like
Speaker 1: have transgender people take over schools and the country and
Speaker 1: the government. I've seen this on far right shows, you know,
Speaker 1: and speaking about Aaron's points, I want to ask Aaron Aaron.
Speaker 1: Is the idea of a trans agenda overblown? Why is
Speaker 1: this the issue that the right chooses to embolden their base?
Speaker 1: And so so?
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think that I would The only reason people
Speaker 4: tackle on an issue is because it gets their base.
Speaker 4: It gets it gets them elected, it gives them right.
Speaker 4: If it wasn't an issue that got them elected, they
Speaker 4: wouldn't harp on it, right, If they were losing votes
Speaker 4: because of it, they would stop, you know, harping on it.
Speaker 4: There's no trans agenda on the left, Allard. All the
Speaker 4: left is doing with trans is we're listening to people.
Speaker 4: We believe them when they share their experiences about their gender.
Speaker 4: We listen to people that study this kind of thing,
Speaker 4: and we believe what the experts are saying that gender
Speaker 4: is a spectrum. Gender isn't a binary, It isn't left
Speaker 4: and right. It's a spectrum. It is also a social contract.
Speaker 4: That means we make it up as a culture, as
Speaker 4: a group of people in this country. We make up
Speaker 4: what gender means. We make up what it means to
Speaker 4: be a man, we make up what it means to
Speaker 4: be a woman. And when you make that up, why
Speaker 4: can't someone who was born one way feel a different way,
Speaker 4: and vice versa. Right, So the only people with an
Speaker 4: agenda are the right. The whole point of this guy's
Speaker 4: article seems to be I'm getting the theocracy. I want
Speaker 4: what's your guys' problem?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 4: Right, And his arguments against the left seem to be
Speaker 4: just projections about the very things that he and the
Speaker 4: right are doing. They're the ones that have created the
Speaker 4: transgender issue, right, They're the ones being dogmatic about things,
Speaker 4: and they're accusing the left of being dogmatic, but they're
Speaker 4: the ones that are saying, oh no, there're can only
Speaker 4: be left, they're only be man woman. That's dogmatic. That's
Speaker 4: an agenda. That's an agenda because.
Speaker 2: They won the abortion issue, right and so.
Speaker 4: But but unfortunately their policies lead to people dying. When
Speaker 4: you don't give transgender people the care they need. People
Speaker 4: die when you don't problem. When you limit access to abortion,
Speaker 4: women die. And I just don't understand why people can't
Speaker 4: can't see that. Yeah, well, the policies on the left
Speaker 4: of allowing access to abortion, allowing access to transgender care
Speaker 4: that helps people live and be and stay alive.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And the reason I bring up the transgender issue
Speaker 1: is because you know, there is there is some fanaticism,
Speaker 1: just like Eli was talking about with the abortion fanaticism,
Speaker 1: Like there's there is fanaticism over sexuality for some reason
Speaker 1: on the right, probably because there's such similarities between conservative
Speaker 1: thinking and religion, you know, that which is obsessed with
Speaker 1: with sexuality, that it kind of just comes out in
Speaker 1: their politics. You know, I think this is kind of
Speaker 1: like beating a dead horse at this point. You know,
Speaker 1: what what is it going to take to get people
Speaker 1: to realize that Christianity or religion in general in government
Speaker 1: is resulting in this hatred. And Kelly, you know, not
Speaker 1: to pick on you, not to be an agist, but
Speaker 1: you talked about Beatles albums being burned in churches right
Speaker 1: in the sixties. So have we improved or what was
Speaker 1: going on?
Speaker 2: No, we've gotten worse. We we go to you know,
Speaker 2: people talk about the Satanic panic of the eighties, Right,
Speaker 2: that wasn't the Satanic panic that we had a huge
Speaker 2: one in the eighteen nineties that resulted in alcohol being illegalized. Right,
Speaker 2: Science funding was just pretty much stopped in America at
Speaker 2: that point because of religious fervor. So that was really
Speaker 2: against a social issue, right, drinking that was their big
Speaker 2: satanic panic. Then a few years go by eighties, roll up,
Speaker 2: and now we're going to go against games, D and
Speaker 2: D games, rock and roll music. We're looking at things again, right,
Speaker 2: and now we're in another satanic panic, let's face it,
Speaker 2: and this time it's not about a thing, It's about people. Right.
Speaker 2: So as savage as these last two panics were against
Speaker 2: the subject of the panic, if that kind of animosity
Speaker 2: gets pulled over towards people, those people are in a
Speaker 2: very dangerous situation. Right. This is unlike any other crazy
Speaker 2: religious fervor we've had before. And here's this guy president
Speaker 2: to focus on family. Everybody know National Day of Prayer
Speaker 2: that got started by focus on family. This is a
Speaker 2: guy saying this is what we need to have. This
Speaker 2: is what we're gonna do. We're now in charge of
Speaker 2: the government. And in a way, you know, I hate
Speaker 2: to boil it down to like one issue or something
Speaker 2: like this, but when I was going to the ballot
Speaker 2: box this November, one of the things I was thinking
Speaker 2: is I have to vote for genocide against the LGBTQQ community,
Speaker 2: or I have to vote for genocide against Palestinians. And
Speaker 2: I was, you know, how do you judge, how do
Speaker 2: you decide what you're gonna do when you got that
Speaker 2: the juice from so I had to go with trying
Speaker 2: to save the person on my block instead of the
Speaker 2: person on the other side of the world.
Speaker 1: So well, you know it's not that simple. I mean,
Speaker 1: I know that, you know it's not.
Speaker 2: I know it's not. But it's like that in a
Speaker 2: way that gets the way it boiled down to me
Speaker 2: in a way that but.
Speaker 1: You could have removed that. You could have removed that
Speaker 1: conflict completely and had a completely different conflict that stood
Speaker 1: out as as profound. For example, for me, it was
Speaker 1: do I do I vote for the people who value
Speaker 1: law and order or do I vote for the people
Speaker 1: who think it's okay to lie about an election and
Speaker 1: overthrow the government, knowing full well that there are other
Speaker 1: issues on the table that I need to consider, and
Speaker 1: women it only needs to be a one issue, you know,
Speaker 1: That's how serious it is in any way, as I
Speaker 1: you know, I digress a little bit, but not really.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think I'm circling back to the point
Speaker 1: of the topic. We've got people who are hysterical on
Speaker 1: both sides, where I think one is completely reasonable and
Speaker 1: the other is completely unreasonable. And I'll let you, gentlemen
Speaker 1: decide which which is uh, you know, reasonable, which is not? Well,
Speaker 1: who's getting ascribed what in that scenario? But I wanna,
Speaker 1: I want to do a final lightning round with each you.
Speaker 1: I'll go Aaron Kelly, Eli, Sar, what do you got?
Speaker 4: The deep deep rot in the in the Republican Party
Speaker 4: is the absolute hypocrisy of their position.
Speaker 1: Absolute hypocrisy, the absolute hypocrisy, hypocrisy.
Speaker 4: And everything they say in the everything they support. If
Speaker 4: anybody remembers the nineties when Clinton was president, and oh
Speaker 4: the awful things the Republicans would say about Clinton because
Speaker 4: of his sexual proclivities and his actions, how he was
Speaker 4: unfit for office. And now look where we're at, and
Speaker 4: we don't get that same. There's just that they should
Speaker 4: be absolutely criteria, right, People on Fox New should be like,
Speaker 4: this guy's not fit for office because that's what we
Speaker 4: said against Clinton. He's worse than Clinton but sexually, so
Speaker 4: we have to be No, there's just no all the
Speaker 4: all all that matters is having power, being in control.
Speaker 4: The ends justifies the means. Is it's the hypocrisy that
Speaker 4: drives me hysterical.
Speaker 1: All right, thank you very much, Kelly. You know, yeah
Speaker 1: that you're so oh so so right there. And I
Speaker 1: hate to see younger people flocking to that hYP hypocrisy,
Speaker 1: but a lot of a lot of these kids have
Speaker 1: already been indoctrinated to it because of religion. How much
Speaker 1: of that hypocrisy hypocrisy do we see in religion too,
Speaker 1: So it just becomes like a part of life.
Speaker 2: You just accept it. And that's we've gotten more. We've
Speaker 2: become more and more and more accepting of people saying
Speaker 2: one thing and then doing another. And I think that's
Speaker 2: been a really really big problem in our country. That's
Speaker 2: about all I got, so.
Speaker 3: Eli, Uh yeah, I'm at the point anymore, kind of
Speaker 3: along the lines of what you were saying, Kelly, or
Speaker 3: both of you were saying, not really surprised anymore when, like,
Speaker 3: you know, people in power do or don't go through
Speaker 3: with things they did or didn't say they would or
Speaker 3: wouldn't do. I'm just like, yeah, I mean that tracks
Speaker 3: I'm fully prepared to like buy it, but it pay
Speaker 3: It's just, yeah, one of those things we're so accustomed to.
Speaker 3: We we know that this system is fucked, and we're
Speaker 3: just like, yeah, it's kind of that way, and it's
Speaker 3: really just sort of disheartening when you think about it.
Speaker 4: I'm wondering where when is rock bottom?
Speaker 1: I fear that we're going to find out because I
Speaker 1: was going to have to vote. You know what, Kelly,
Speaker 1: Kelly's the person to answer that question.
Speaker 2: Right, It's right, it's right there, you know.
Speaker 1: I so checks and balances my ass. Okay, checks and
Speaker 1: balances my ass. What happens when all three branches of
Speaker 1: the government coalesce, right, they acquiesce with each other's agenda,
Speaker 1: And we've not seen that before to the scale that
Speaker 1: we have the United that's right, that is right, that
Speaker 1: is exactly right, and the people who have control of
Speaker 1: all three branches are not right. And I got to
Speaker 1: say the one.
Speaker 2: I was hardened by the fact that two cabinet picks
Speaker 2: were checked by the Senate and they've already withdrawn. So maybe,
Speaker 2: you know, maybe they're a little bit of hope, hopefully, yeah,
Speaker 2: from some good thinking.
Speaker 1: Still, so this opens up a can of worms. And
Speaker 1: you know, I just need to point out two things, right,
Speaker 1: So one, I wanted to say that the single greatest
Speaker 1: failure of our constitution is a Supreme Court. Okay, We're
Speaker 1: on a topic right where I think it's appropriate to
Speaker 1: mention that because the Supreme Court was deliberately designed in
Speaker 1: such a way that they would not be politicized, and
Speaker 1: that is exactly the opposite of what's happening. So complete failure, right,
Speaker 1: and it's actually allowing for the checks and balances to fail. Two,
Speaker 1: we have got a private citizen, Elon Musk, threatening the
Speaker 1: arrest of Democrats in office and threatening to fund primaries
Speaker 1: for anybody that does not go along with the president
Speaker 1: of lex agenda. That is incredibly dangerous. The richest man
Speaker 1: in the world has essentially bought himself a kingship, a
Speaker 1: kingship in the most powerful country in the world, with
Speaker 1: the most powerful military and the larged economy. And it's
Speaker 1: an awful thing to think about. So where is rock bottom, Aaron?
Speaker 1: I think we're pretty damn close. I think we are
Speaker 1: pretty damn close.
Speaker 4: I thought that where we were in twenty twenty. My friend, Yep,
Speaker 4: that's where I thought we were in twenty twenty, and.
Speaker 1: It, unfortunately is not going in the right direction.
Speaker 4: So what I'm doing to manage is I'm a lover
Speaker 4: of sci fi and fantasy, and you can't get very
Speaker 4: far in sci fi and fantasy without getting some really
Speaker 4: good apocalyptic movies and TV shows and books or post apocalyptics.
Speaker 4: So and for whatever reason, there's part of our brains
Speaker 4: that just love apocalyptic stuff. So the old the way
Speaker 4: I'm managing is I'm just I'm just connecting with that
Speaker 4: part of myself. And I'm popping popcorn and I'm watching
Speaker 4: the apocalypse and and I'm just I'm enjoying the coming apocalypse.
Speaker 4: I know that sounds crazy, but that's that's what I'm doing.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm not going to be party to that.
Speaker 4: I'm working. I'm still here, working, trying to change things. Yeah,
Speaker 4: but to cope, I'm connecting to my love of apocalypses.
Speaker 1: I am foolishly gonna put my faith, if you will,
Speaker 1: in the American people and hope they do the right
Speaker 1: thing if push comes to shove. I want to say
Speaker 1: one more thing. I'm sorry we mentioned earlier in the
Speaker 1: week in article where and I like to remind people
Speaker 1: of this. Our Vice president elect did, in fact one time,
Speaker 1: call President elect Trump the Adolf Hitler of our time.
Speaker 1: You know, just today I saw a clip that was
Speaker 1: released by the potential Department of Defense Secretary Pete Haigs
Speaker 1: at the Fox News anchor completely eviscerating Donald Trump. And
Speaker 1: the only reason I bring that up is because I
Speaker 1: want to highlight Aaron's point about the hypocrisy and really
Speaker 1: show another example of the hypocrisy that this article uncovers.
Speaker 1: And with that, folks, thank you for tuning in with us.
Speaker 1: It has been a great week. Go back, check out
Speaker 1: our other articles, our other shows that we've done, and
Speaker 1: don't forget to stay tuned into the nonprofits. Thanks again,