WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.520 --> 00:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the nonprofits. Our third story this week.

2
00:00:03.560 --> 00:00:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Takes us into the halls of Congress where Huse speaker

3
00:00:06.480 --> 00:00:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Mike Johnson recently quoted Thomas Jefferson during his National Prayer?

4
00:00:11.439 --> 00:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Or did he? Chris Mallard? Can he help clarify?

5
00:00:15.279 --> 00:00:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Scott. According to Johnson, Thomas Jefferson supposedly recited

6
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the National Prayer of Peace every day of his presidency,

7
00:00:24.519 --> 00:00:27.600
<v Speaker 3>even right up until his death. But let's take a

8
00:00:27.640 --> 00:00:30.879
<v Speaker 3>moment here, that's not quite the truth. The Jefferson Foundation

9
00:00:31.199 --> 00:00:35.280
<v Speaker 3>and historians have been clear that there is no historical

10
00:00:35.320 --> 00:00:40.719
<v Speaker 3>evidence to support this so called prayer by Jefferson, and

11
00:00:40.759 --> 00:00:44.000
<v Speaker 3>they've labeled it as frankly bogus. And Johnson isn't the

12
00:00:44.000 --> 00:00:47.039
<v Speaker 3>first person to trot out this nonsense. It's been making

13
00:00:47.079 --> 00:00:51.399
<v Speaker 3>the rounds in certain religious circles for years. Now. Here's

14
00:00:51.439 --> 00:00:55.759
<v Speaker 3>where it really gets interesting. Thomas Jefferson wasn't exactly the

15
00:00:55.759 --> 00:00:58.399
<v Speaker 3>pious Christian many want him to be. He leaned heavily

16
00:00:58.520 --> 00:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>towards deism, belief system that acknowledges the Creator but rejects

17
00:01:02.960 --> 00:01:07.480
<v Speaker 3>organize religion and divine intervention in human affairs. Jefferson wasn't

18
00:01:07.519 --> 00:01:11.840
<v Speaker 3>skeptical or He was skeptical of many core Christian doctrines,

19
00:01:11.920 --> 00:01:15.079
<v Speaker 3>like the divinity of Jesus or miracles, and he even

20
00:01:15.079 --> 00:01:17.159
<v Speaker 3>went so far as to create his own version of

21
00:01:17.200 --> 00:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the Bible, removing all the supernatural elements and focusing solely

22
00:01:21.840 --> 00:01:26.319
<v Speaker 3>on Jesus's teachings. So, while Jefferson may have respected the

23
00:01:26.319 --> 00:01:30.480
<v Speaker 3>moral teachings of Christianity, he firmly believed that religion should

24
00:01:30.519 --> 00:01:33.799
<v Speaker 3>be a personal matter. In fact, he was so passionate

25
00:01:33.799 --> 00:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>about this that he wrote the Virginia's Statute for Religious

26
00:01:36.879 --> 00:01:40.599
<v Speaker 3>Freedom in seventeen seventy six, which was adopted in seventeen

27
00:01:40.719 --> 00:01:44.959
<v Speaker 3>eighty six. That statute was essentially the first legal attempt

28
00:01:45.239 --> 00:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>in our young nation's history to separate church from state,

29
00:01:49.719 --> 00:01:53.680
<v Speaker 3>a principle he championed throughout his career. When I hear

30
00:01:53.719 --> 00:01:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Johnson's claim, I feel it it's like yet another attempt

31
00:01:56.760 --> 00:02:00.599
<v Speaker 3>to rewrite history, to turn someone who is openly critical

32
00:02:00.599 --> 00:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>of institutionalized religion into some kind of Christian mascot. Jefferson's

33
00:02:05.840 --> 00:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>actual beliefs tell a very different story, one that underscores

34
00:02:10.039 --> 00:02:13.360
<v Speaker 3>his commitment to personal freedom and the separation of religion

35
00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:16.719
<v Speaker 3>and government. This was from an article from Newsbreak by

36
00:02:16.800 --> 00:02:19.639
<v Speaker 3>Kelly Dallas on January seventh, twenty twenty four.

37
00:02:19.840 --> 00:02:23.039
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, Chris, you were talking about how Speaker

38
00:02:23.120 --> 00:02:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Johnson was misquoting Jefferson and was being called out for it.

39
00:02:27.280 --> 00:02:29.439
<v Speaker 1>But is this author burying the lead here?

40
00:02:29.840 --> 00:02:31.919
<v Speaker 3>I think so, don't you think so? Anybody else to

41
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:35.680
<v Speaker 3>show of hands? I mean, they're like, the real thing

42
00:02:35.719 --> 00:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>here is Johnson's up there, the third, I believe, the

43
00:02:39.159 --> 00:02:42.520
<v Speaker 3>third highest political power in the land, and he's up

44
00:02:42.520 --> 00:02:47.840
<v Speaker 3>there spouting misinformation and doing prayers. The prayer itself is

45
00:02:47.879 --> 00:02:52.159
<v Speaker 3>really what should be taken as the biggest defense, and

46
00:02:52.199 --> 00:02:54.159
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of one of the things I noticed. I'm like, well,

47
00:02:54.240 --> 00:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>wait a second, this author really seems to be like,

48
00:02:56.520 --> 00:03:00.520
<v Speaker 3>oh my goodness, my pearls about the fact that he's

49
00:03:01.120 --> 00:03:05.879
<v Speaker 3>misquoting Johnson. He's upset because he's misquoting or Jefferson, right,

50
00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:10.400
<v Speaker 3>not that he's praying leading a national prayer from our

51
00:03:10.439 --> 00:03:12.199
<v Speaker 3>country in the name of our country.

52
00:03:12.680 --> 00:03:16.719
<v Speaker 1>So it's how he's praying, right, Yeah.

53
00:03:16.639 --> 00:03:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, wait a second, Well, yeah, it's it's one of

54
00:03:18.560 --> 00:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>those How can you be so oblivious to the obvious fact.

55
00:03:23.000 --> 00:03:25.400
<v Speaker 3>I was surprised as I kept waiting reading the article.

56
00:03:25.719 --> 00:03:27.639
<v Speaker 3>I was going on, right, man, here he goes, he's

57
00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:29.159
<v Speaker 3>going to say it, He's going to say it. But

58
00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:31.280
<v Speaker 3>in the very beginning they just kind of skipped over it.

59
00:03:31.520 --> 00:03:33.159
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's kind of weird that they're doing a

60
00:03:33.159 --> 00:03:37.280
<v Speaker 3>prayer at all. But right, okay, what evs can you

61
00:03:37.319 --> 00:03:38.400
<v Speaker 3>believe they misquoted?

62
00:03:39.080 --> 00:03:43.639
<v Speaker 4>Like okay, how dare they how when when when they're

63
00:03:43.719 --> 00:03:47.120
<v Speaker 4>giving a prayer and you know, government function, how dare

64
00:03:47.159 --> 00:03:49.599
<v Speaker 4>they miss you know, use the wrong person or say

65
00:03:49.639 --> 00:03:50.240
<v Speaker 4>the wrong thing.

66
00:03:50.759 --> 00:03:52.319
<v Speaker 3>And it would have been even more It would have

67
00:03:52.319 --> 00:03:57.759
<v Speaker 3>been appropriate had they leaned into why misquoting Jefferson was

68
00:03:57.800 --> 00:04:01.520
<v Speaker 3>important or or mister tribute this to Jefferson. But they didn't.

69
00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:03.479
<v Speaker 3>They didn't. They just kind of up Jefferson and they

70
00:04:03.560 --> 00:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of barely went, you know, he's kind of against

71
00:04:05.400 --> 00:04:08.120
<v Speaker 3>this sort of thing. They didn't really talk about the statute,

72
00:04:08.199 --> 00:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>the Virginia Statute of separation, you know what I mean.

73
00:04:11.800 --> 00:04:14.080
<v Speaker 3>They didn't talk about any of those things. So you're

74
00:04:14.199 --> 00:04:17.920
<v Speaker 3>left wondering, well, why did you write this article at all? Right,

75
00:04:18.000 --> 00:04:20.160
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it does seem like they really stepped over

76
00:04:20.920 --> 00:04:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the biggest point to just elucidate this tiny little thing. Again,

77
00:04:26.040 --> 00:04:29.079
<v Speaker 3>they could have, especially had they been really detailed about

78
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:32.360
<v Speaker 3>what Jefferson was about, that would have made more sense

79
00:04:32.759 --> 00:04:34.720
<v Speaker 3>as to why they're doing this. But really, I think

80
00:04:34.759 --> 00:04:38.199
<v Speaker 3>the focus, the main light should have been shined on

81
00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:41.079
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the guy's leading a national prayer.

82
00:04:40.680 --> 00:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, exactly, exactly, Eli, I want to jump over

83
00:04:44.879 --> 00:04:47.839
<v Speaker 2>to you. I'm gonna I don't think I'm going too

84
00:04:47.920 --> 00:04:50.000
<v Speaker 2>far out on a limb if I say that I

85
00:04:50.040 --> 00:04:53.399
<v Speaker 2>don't think you support public prayers led by government officials.

86
00:04:54.519 --> 00:04:56.240
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think we're on the same boat

87
00:04:56.920 --> 00:04:59.759
<v Speaker 2>on this panel, But why is that a particular issue

88
00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:02.519
<v Speaker 2>as especially when we're talking about government officials?

89
00:05:02.839 --> 00:05:05.639
<v Speaker 5>So kind of exactly, like Chris said at the very

90
00:05:05.639 --> 00:05:07.759
<v Speaker 5>beginning of this artlist, is the problem, at least according

91
00:05:07.759 --> 00:05:10.720
<v Speaker 5>to some scholars, wasn't that he prayed in the US Capitol?

92
00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:13.600
<v Speaker 5>And and I second guessed myself, I'm like, isn't that

93
00:05:13.680 --> 00:05:15.279
<v Speaker 5>like exactly the problem?

94
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:15.839
<v Speaker 3>Right?

95
00:05:15.920 --> 00:05:19.720
<v Speaker 5>And it's because, as you said, Chris, he is second

96
00:05:19.759 --> 00:05:23.399
<v Speaker 5>in line, so the third like that, there's the president,

97
00:05:23.800 --> 00:05:26.000
<v Speaker 5>vice president, and then the Speaker of the House is

98
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:29.000
<v Speaker 5>Mike Johnson. He's a third person in line for the presidency,

99
00:05:29.480 --> 00:05:33.839
<v Speaker 5>and he's basically declaring, here the prayer reads in part,

100
00:05:34.160 --> 00:05:35.240
<v Speaker 5>or it goes.

101
00:05:35.000 --> 00:05:36.279
<v Speaker 6>In part, I should.

102
00:05:36.040 --> 00:05:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Say, in time of prosperity, fill our hearts with thankfulness

103
00:05:39.759 --> 00:05:43.319
<v Speaker 5>and the day, Yeah, Jesus Christ our lord. A men. Right,

104
00:05:43.399 --> 00:05:47.879
<v Speaker 5>So he's he's he's declaring Jesus Christ as our collective lord,

105
00:05:47.920 --> 00:05:50.360
<v Speaker 5>at least for like Congress, at least for the House

106
00:05:50.360 --> 00:05:56.720
<v Speaker 5>of Representatives, in like in the office on official time,

107
00:05:56.800 --> 00:05:58.720
<v Speaker 5>like like the official Like that is a thing you

108
00:05:58.800 --> 00:06:01.519
<v Speaker 5>can't do. Like I'm nogal expert here, but like that's

109
00:06:01.839 --> 00:06:04.519
<v Speaker 5>that sounds a lot to me, like establishing, you know.

110
00:06:04.759 --> 00:06:07.279
<v Speaker 6>A preferred religious doctrine.

111
00:06:07.480 --> 00:06:10.160
<v Speaker 5>So the fact that this is happening at all absolutely

112
00:06:10.160 --> 00:06:12.480
<v Speaker 5>blows my mind. And and that he's doing it. That's

113
00:06:12.519 --> 00:06:14.079
<v Speaker 5>when I think the problem is that he is so

114
00:06:14.319 --> 00:06:17.920
<v Speaker 5>high in that chain and that he's basically declaring, like, yep,

115
00:06:18.079 --> 00:06:21.120
<v Speaker 5>this is the guy he's ours for all of us.

116
00:06:21.680 --> 00:06:24.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess we could latch onto that the author's

117
00:06:24.360 --> 00:06:27.319
<v Speaker 3>point now as briefly as he made it, as weekly

118
00:06:27.399 --> 00:06:30.600
<v Speaker 3>as he made it, and for Johnson in that position

119
00:06:30.720 --> 00:06:35.560
<v Speaker 3>to use that prayer and then try to rewrite John Jefferson,

120
00:06:35.600 --> 00:06:38.560
<v Speaker 3>who is actually a proponent of the separation of church

121
00:06:38.600 --> 00:06:41.079
<v Speaker 3>and state. So it's like a double whammy here. Not

122
00:06:41.160 --> 00:06:44.519
<v Speaker 3>only did he do the prayer, but he also tried

123
00:06:44.560 --> 00:06:48.079
<v Speaker 3>to make it sound like the person who put originally

124
00:06:48.240 --> 00:06:51.079
<v Speaker 3>put that wedge between church and state didn't really do that.

125
00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:53.600
<v Speaker 3>And every day was walking around saying this prayer.

126
00:06:53.759 --> 00:06:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, it's almost like he's injury and adding insult to injury. Right,

127
00:06:59.079 --> 00:07:02.639
<v Speaker 2>you're using the prayer, but then you are misquoting it

128
00:07:02.680 --> 00:07:06.600
<v Speaker 2>to make somebody, you know, seem like they were against

129
00:07:06.720 --> 00:07:08.879
<v Speaker 2>what they you know, what was one of the most

130
00:07:09.160 --> 00:07:11.759
<v Speaker 2>important philosophies in their in their life.

131
00:07:11.959 --> 00:07:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Christian conservative politician would mislead people in this fashion

132
00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:18.879
<v Speaker 3>is on brand for them, to be honest.

133
00:07:22.720 --> 00:07:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was in my notes too, that like the

134
00:07:26.360 --> 00:07:31.240
<v Speaker 5>exactly that same thing. It's just that Jefferson absolutely would

135
00:07:31.279 --> 00:07:33.120
<v Speaker 5>not have agreed with the use of a prayer in

136
00:07:33.160 --> 00:07:35.920
<v Speaker 5>this context. Even if he did use that prayer privately,

137
00:07:36.040 --> 00:07:38.720
<v Speaker 5>and like let's say it worked true that privately every

138
00:07:38.800 --> 00:07:40.519
<v Speaker 5>day he would wake up or go before you go

139
00:07:40.560 --> 00:07:42.879
<v Speaker 5>to bed, he would pray this particularly that great, he

140
00:07:42.879 --> 00:07:45.480
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't have done it in public office for sure. He

141
00:07:45.480 --> 00:07:47.639
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't have like encouraged others to do it or like

142
00:07:47.680 --> 00:07:50.480
<v Speaker 5>force others to because he didn't like that that that

143
00:07:50.600 --> 00:07:53.399
<v Speaker 5>wasn't how he viewed the relationship and the interplay between

144
00:07:53.439 --> 00:07:57.120
<v Speaker 5>religion and government, and that I think that makes it,

145
00:07:57.160 --> 00:07:58.759
<v Speaker 5>like you guys have said, even more.

146
00:07:58.839 --> 00:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So, Eli, then do you think that I mean, you know, we're.

147
00:08:02.439 --> 00:08:04.839
<v Speaker 2>All surprised that the article focused too much on the

148
00:08:04.879 --> 00:08:07.360
<v Speaker 2>content of the prayer rather than the fact that there

149
00:08:07.439 --> 00:08:10.399
<v Speaker 2>was a prayer in the first place. So do you

150
00:08:10.480 --> 00:08:14.399
<v Speaker 2>think that might have been an intentional move on the

151
00:08:14.439 --> 00:08:17.839
<v Speaker 2>part of the author? Is he trying to downplay the

152
00:08:17.839 --> 00:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>prayer itself and kind of make a bigger deal out

153
00:08:20.319 --> 00:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>of the It's kind of like a like a an

154
00:08:22.600 --> 00:08:25.560
<v Speaker 2>illusionist doing a distraction, right, Look at this hand over here,

155
00:08:25.839 --> 00:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>and then you won't notice what you know, me, you know,

156
00:08:28.279 --> 00:08:30.879
<v Speaker 2>stacking the deck with my left hand or whatever. Does

157
00:08:30.879 --> 00:08:34.399
<v Speaker 2>this mean that there's a shift in public interest? Do

158
00:08:34.879 --> 00:08:38.919
<v Speaker 2>you think that prayer is being official, prayer is being normalized?

159
00:08:39.200 --> 00:08:39.799
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely?

160
00:08:39.960 --> 00:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

161
00:08:40.240 --> 00:08:43.440
<v Speaker 5>And I think the author, Kelsey Dallas, kind of shows

162
00:08:43.440 --> 00:08:45.559
<v Speaker 5>their hand by saying at the beating, like I mentioned already,

163
00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:48.519
<v Speaker 5>the problem wasn't that he prayed in the US capital.

164
00:08:48.559 --> 00:08:50.639
<v Speaker 5>They don't see that as a problem. It's one of

165
00:08:50.679 --> 00:08:52.679
<v Speaker 5>those things that it's like, well, yeah, you can pray

166
00:08:52.679 --> 00:08:54.320
<v Speaker 5>in the capital, only it's a pretty entry. You know,

167
00:08:54.360 --> 00:08:57.399
<v Speaker 5>there's a Christian Christian nation front that on Christian principles,

168
00:08:57.399 --> 00:09:02.039
<v Speaker 5>so of course you're going to pray. And it's sort

169
00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:05.399
<v Speaker 5>of coming to this point where I think conservative voters,

170
00:09:05.399 --> 00:09:07.360
<v Speaker 5>at least for the most part, have said before this

171
00:09:07.480 --> 00:09:08.919
<v Speaker 5>week a couple episodes.

172
00:09:08.919 --> 00:09:10.759
<v Speaker 6>Now, no, no group.

173
00:09:10.519 --> 00:09:13.799
<v Speaker 5>Is a monolith, but there is a vast section of

174
00:09:13.919 --> 00:09:18.399
<v Speaker 5>conservative voter that have interwoven their their religious faith and

175
00:09:18.480 --> 00:09:22.919
<v Speaker 5>their political views so tightly that they they don't there

176
00:09:23.320 --> 00:09:26.879
<v Speaker 5>is no distinguishing between the two, all of their political stances,

177
00:09:27.000 --> 00:09:30.440
<v Speaker 5>everything that they vote on, everything that they go to

178
00:09:30.480 --> 00:09:33.960
<v Speaker 5>the polls for has it's some like the their reason

179
00:09:34.039 --> 00:09:37.720
<v Speaker 5>for doing so is religious and when they see things

180
00:09:37.799 --> 00:09:39.919
<v Speaker 5>like this they don't see it as problematic. They think

181
00:09:39.960 --> 00:09:43.600
<v Speaker 5>they think, not only would a good leader, you know,

182
00:09:43.799 --> 00:09:49.600
<v Speaker 5>use their their publicly elected office to declare one deity

183
00:09:49.799 --> 00:09:51.600
<v Speaker 5>as the lord of all.

184
00:09:51.519 --> 00:09:55.519
<v Speaker 6>People in the building, but they should do that.

185
00:09:56.120 --> 00:09:58.840
<v Speaker 5>That's what there's a there's a a vast chunk of

186
00:09:58.919 --> 00:10:01.519
<v Speaker 5>voters who think that that's the way things off be done.

187
00:10:01.679 --> 00:10:03.240
<v Speaker 6>And that's for the problem.

188
00:10:03.279 --> 00:10:06.200
<v Speaker 2>So we were familiar with the idea of a single

189
00:10:06.320 --> 00:10:08.639
<v Speaker 2>issue voter, right, somebody who's going to vote based off

190
00:10:08.639 --> 00:10:11.200
<v Speaker 2>a single issue. But in a way, what we're looking

191
00:10:11.240 --> 00:10:14.559
<v Speaker 2>at here is single issue livers. You know, people with

192
00:10:14.639 --> 00:10:18.120
<v Speaker 2>single issue lives. They want to direct everything towards the

193
00:10:18.679 --> 00:10:22.120
<v Speaker 2>praise of this of this deity, and and I don't know,

194
00:10:22.159 --> 00:10:24.039
<v Speaker 2>that just seems a little misguided to me.

195
00:10:24.080 --> 00:10:25.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, if Chris, what do you think about that?

196
00:10:26.120 --> 00:10:31.679
<v Speaker 3>I agree, it's a really it feels like Mike Johnson

197
00:10:31.840 --> 00:10:34.799
<v Speaker 3>is trying to smooth over the fact right that he's

198
00:10:34.879 --> 00:10:39.279
<v Speaker 3>praying officially in the country's name. He's trying to smooth

199
00:10:39.320 --> 00:10:43.360
<v Speaker 3>that over by referencing Thomas Jefferson, who was a proponent

200
00:10:43.480 --> 00:10:45.519
<v Speaker 3>of the separation of church and state, and trying to

201
00:10:45.519 --> 00:10:49.559
<v Speaker 3>make it sound like he was on or Jefferson essentially

202
00:10:49.559 --> 00:10:52.919
<v Speaker 3>did the same thing. It's clear miss misinterpretation of what

203
00:10:53.000 --> 00:10:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Jefferson done. I believe it's quite intentional, and I think

204
00:10:55.639 --> 00:10:57.720
<v Speaker 3>it's he wanted to say the prayer. He wanted to

205
00:10:57.720 --> 00:10:59.759
<v Speaker 3>get up there and do it for our nation, and

206
00:10:59.799 --> 00:11:02.679
<v Speaker 3>this this is his way of kind of mitigating the backwash.

207
00:11:02.840 --> 00:11:06.120
<v Speaker 3>He just kind of screwed up our backlash. He screwed

208
00:11:06.200 --> 00:11:09.200
<v Speaker 3>up in his well, he didn't. He did exactly what

209
00:11:09.279 --> 00:11:11.000
<v Speaker 3>he wanted to do. And then, of course the author

210
00:11:11.039 --> 00:11:15.519
<v Speaker 3>of the article elucidated that the fact that he pointed

211
00:11:15.519 --> 00:11:18.759
<v Speaker 3>out the little, tiny, little the little piece of information

212
00:11:18.840 --> 00:11:20.919
<v Speaker 3>that oh yeah, this isn't really the way Johnson would

213
00:11:20.919 --> 00:11:22.840
<v Speaker 3>have done it, and then moved on talked about something else,

214
00:11:22.879 --> 00:11:23.080
<v Speaker 3>you know.

215
00:11:23.159 --> 00:11:25.399
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, right, so you're you're thinking it was an

216
00:11:25.480 --> 00:11:31.039
<v Speaker 2>intentional yahs. Interesting, Elian. I want to get your opinion

217
00:11:31.080 --> 00:11:33.799
<v Speaker 2>on that. I want to couch it slightly differently, though,

218
00:11:34.559 --> 00:11:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I want us to look at the context of the

219
00:11:37.000 --> 00:11:39.559
<v Speaker 2>New Testament. Okay, I want you got to take it

220
00:11:39.600 --> 00:11:43.519
<v Speaker 2>in context, right, But we often hear about the four

221
00:11:43.559 --> 00:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Gospels that they're all different, and one of the explanations

222
00:11:46.720 --> 00:11:50.879
<v Speaker 2>is that the and we hear this from Bible scholars,

223
00:11:51.240 --> 00:11:54.840
<v Speaker 2>is that the four different authors were kind of telling

224
00:11:54.879 --> 00:11:58.159
<v Speaker 2>a similar story, but they were adding things to the

225
00:11:58.240 --> 00:12:03.080
<v Speaker 2>story to support their their particular perspectives or the particular

226
00:12:03.120 --> 00:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>point that they're trying to make.

227
00:12:04.360 --> 00:12:05.519
<v Speaker 1>And so in a.

228
00:12:05.559 --> 00:12:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Way we can see examples of that as like you

229
00:12:09.879 --> 00:12:14.120
<v Speaker 2>might call it a literary style. I think that Bible

230
00:12:14.159 --> 00:12:17.919
<v Speaker 2>believers would would probably you know, rail against that. I mean,

231
00:12:18.080 --> 00:12:19.559
<v Speaker 2>I think that they would take offense if we call

232
00:12:19.600 --> 00:12:21.960
<v Speaker 2>that just merely a literary style.

233
00:12:22.320 --> 00:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But do you think that what's that the emphasis?

234
00:12:25.879 --> 00:12:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Right? Yeah?

235
00:12:27.080 --> 00:12:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Right?

236
00:12:27.320 --> 00:12:30.360
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, so they're they're they're focusing the emphasis depending

237
00:12:30.399 --> 00:12:35.120
<v Speaker 2>on their personal political agendas here. So let's compare that

238
00:12:35.159 --> 00:12:38.279
<v Speaker 2>to what with what Johnson is doing here. Chris was

239
00:12:38.320 --> 00:12:43.240
<v Speaker 2>saying that he thought that Johnson was intentionally misrepresenting what

240
00:12:43.360 --> 00:12:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Jefferson says, but we could also argue that maybe he

241
00:12:46.320 --> 00:12:49.639
<v Speaker 2>was just telling the story with a slight enhancement or

242
00:12:49.679 --> 00:12:53.360
<v Speaker 2>little tweaks for for for for for to support his

243
00:12:53.399 --> 00:12:55.759
<v Speaker 2>perspective is do you think that's maybe happening or do

244
00:12:55.799 --> 00:12:58.360
<v Speaker 2>you think he's just flat out lying? I mean, either

245
00:12:58.399 --> 00:13:01.639
<v Speaker 2>way we're gonna there's problems. It's problematic. But do you

246
00:13:01.759 --> 00:13:03.320
<v Speaker 2>do you agree that it was intentional or do you

247
00:13:03.320 --> 00:13:05.279
<v Speaker 2>think it's or do you think he's just trying to

248
00:13:05.279 --> 00:13:08.320
<v Speaker 2>be literary and flowery with his language?

249
00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:12.799
<v Speaker 5>I think so he definitely As far as whether he

250
00:13:12.840 --> 00:13:14.879
<v Speaker 5>knows it's true or not, who can you know it's

251
00:13:14.919 --> 00:13:16.879
<v Speaker 5>anybody's Yes, Apparently other people.

252
00:13:16.639 --> 00:13:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Have gotten that wrong before too.

253
00:13:18.159 --> 00:13:20.039
<v Speaker 5>I had never heard of the prayer or anything, but

254
00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:22.559
<v Speaker 5>like other people have attributed to him before as well,

255
00:13:22.639 --> 00:13:25.159
<v Speaker 5>so he could have have gotten it from some.

256
00:13:25.039 --> 00:13:26.679
<v Speaker 6>Source and not realized it was wrong.

257
00:13:26.879 --> 00:13:30.279
<v Speaker 5>But if it were to be, you know, even if

258
00:13:30.320 --> 00:13:32.159
<v Speaker 5>it were just like, oh, I'm just tweaking it to

259
00:13:32.279 --> 00:13:35.879
<v Speaker 5>kind of, you know, enhance my platform, Like that's still lying, right,

260
00:13:36.879 --> 00:13:39.919
<v Speaker 5>it's still But what I think more what I think

261
00:13:39.960 --> 00:13:42.879
<v Speaker 5>more likely is the case is that by using somebody

262
00:13:42.919 --> 00:13:46.759
<v Speaker 5>like Thomas Jefferson, and he even in his speech he

263
00:13:46.799 --> 00:13:50.240
<v Speaker 5>frames him as you know, a reminders a reminder of

264
00:13:50.240 --> 00:13:52.360
<v Speaker 5>what our third president and the primary author of the

265
00:13:52.360 --> 00:13:55.840
<v Speaker 5>Declaration of Independence thought was so important. So he made

266
00:13:55.879 --> 00:13:59.159
<v Speaker 5>sure to emphasize like, you know, independence, you know, founding

267
00:13:59.200 --> 00:14:03.759
<v Speaker 5>father sort of because of how because of the tendency

268
00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:06.519
<v Speaker 5>that conservative voters have to lean on nostalgia and that

269
00:14:06.639 --> 00:14:09.519
<v Speaker 5>idea of independence and freedom and liberty and yeah yah,

270
00:14:09.559 --> 00:14:11.799
<v Speaker 5>and not realizing that like, we don't have it the

271
00:14:11.840 --> 00:14:13.919
<v Speaker 5>way that they say that they think that we do,

272
00:14:14.159 --> 00:14:18.039
<v Speaker 5>but that they he leans into that a little bit harder,

273
00:14:18.240 --> 00:14:21.240
<v Speaker 5>just to sort of amplify his message a little bit more,

274
00:14:21.480 --> 00:14:25.759
<v Speaker 5>because that that same group of voters are there's a

275
00:14:25.759 --> 00:14:27.960
<v Speaker 5>are there there's a lot of overlap between that group

276
00:14:27.960 --> 00:14:29.960
<v Speaker 5>of voters and the group of voters that make all

277
00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:32.679
<v Speaker 5>of their choices based on their religion. So he's just

278
00:14:32.799 --> 00:14:36.320
<v Speaker 5>sort of increasing the slice of pie that he's connecting

279
00:14:36.360 --> 00:14:38.120
<v Speaker 5>with by tossing that in there.

280
00:14:38.360 --> 00:14:42.159
<v Speaker 2>That's right, interesting, Chris. Do you agree with what Eli

281
00:14:42.279 --> 00:14:44.080
<v Speaker 2>was saying? And I want to add a little spin

282
00:14:44.159 --> 00:14:47.480
<v Speaker 2>to this. Do you think that he is and I

283
00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:50.600
<v Speaker 2>know this is puer speculation. We're trying to peer into

284
00:14:50.639 --> 00:14:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the mind of the Speaker of the House here, but

285
00:14:53.240 --> 00:14:55.879
<v Speaker 2>do you think the lie is the goal?

286
00:14:56.200 --> 00:14:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think he views.

287
00:14:58.080 --> 00:15:02.279
<v Speaker 2>The lie as necessary means to an end.

288
00:15:02.559 --> 00:15:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he feels justified. He maybe he feels it's wrong,

289
00:15:06.080 --> 00:15:08.919
<v Speaker 1>but he feels justified in saying that we've heard that before.

290
00:15:09.320 --> 00:15:10.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, one of the things that it could be,

291
00:15:10.919 --> 00:15:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and to give, if we will, the benefit of the doubt.

292
00:15:13.480 --> 00:15:17.879
<v Speaker 3>It could be that Mike Johnson dips into where it

293
00:15:17.919 --> 00:15:20.840
<v Speaker 3>could be just a reflection of where he gets his information.

294
00:15:20.960 --> 00:15:22.639
<v Speaker 3>He said, down the computer one day, He's like, I'm

295
00:15:22.639 --> 00:15:24.559
<v Speaker 3>going to deliver a national prayer, looked up at his

296
00:15:24.559 --> 00:15:28.080
<v Speaker 3>little Google. Google is all you know how Google or

297
00:15:28.120 --> 00:15:32.200
<v Speaker 3>whatever tones its search to you. So he searched for

298
00:15:32.559 --> 00:15:37.159
<v Speaker 3>national prayer and he found the misinformation that you know,

299
00:15:37.480 --> 00:15:39.960
<v Speaker 3>and because it's probably on his kind of stuff, right,

300
00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:42.399
<v Speaker 3>that's this is exactly the calls coming from within the

301
00:15:42.399 --> 00:15:46.200
<v Speaker 3>house thing, right. Remember, So I'm just saying that it's

302
00:15:46.320 --> 00:15:49.159
<v Speaker 3>possible that he didn't do it on purpose. He actually

303
00:15:49.200 --> 00:15:53.320
<v Speaker 3>believed that this was something that Thomas Jefferson did because

304
00:15:53.360 --> 00:15:55.399
<v Speaker 3>when he did his and I'm going to use the

305
00:15:55.440 --> 00:16:02.279
<v Speaker 3>word forgive me, forgive me research, he fell into his

306
00:16:02.440 --> 00:16:07.399
<v Speaker 3>own levels of misinformation, you know, right, yeah, and didn't

307
00:16:07.440 --> 00:16:08.279
<v Speaker 3>go beyond any of that.

308
00:16:08.399 --> 00:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Really, you know, your your description there just brought this

309
00:16:12.159 --> 00:16:16.000
<v Speaker 2>amazing image to mine. I pictured Johnson like the night

310
00:16:16.080 --> 00:16:19.320
<v Speaker 2>before the speech, sitting down and thinking, shoot, I have

311
00:16:19.360 --> 00:16:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to give a national prayer, and he Google's National prayer

312
00:16:22.879 --> 00:16:23.879
<v Speaker 2>and then this comes up.

313
00:16:25.440 --> 00:16:25.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

314
00:16:25.720 --> 00:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, people are lazy. Yes, yes, they're definitely lazy. Excellent, excellent.

315
00:16:32.960 --> 00:16:35.639
<v Speaker 2>One of my favorite things about this article is that

316
00:16:35.759 --> 00:16:38.080
<v Speaker 2>it's and we don't run across this all that often,

317
00:16:38.120 --> 00:16:40.159
<v Speaker 2>but when when we do find this, I like to

318
00:16:41.200 --> 00:16:43.399
<v Speaker 2>I like to dive into this just headfirst.

319
00:16:43.759 --> 00:16:46.279
<v Speaker 1>They left commenting open on the.

320
00:16:46.360 --> 00:16:48.679
<v Speaker 2>Article, okay, and so I like to skim through then

321
00:16:49.039 --> 00:16:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and see what people actual human beings. I'm assuming. I

322
00:16:52.279 --> 00:16:55.080
<v Speaker 2>suppose maybe that's not a safe bet these days. But

323
00:16:55.639 --> 00:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>so this is what some of the people say. And

324
00:16:57.159 --> 00:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I wrote down three particular comments that I thought interesting,

325
00:17:00.639 --> 00:17:02.919
<v Speaker 2>and so I'll read them to you, and then in

326
00:17:02.960 --> 00:17:05.440
<v Speaker 2>between each one, I'll just get some quick feedback from

327
00:17:05.599 --> 00:17:08.119
<v Speaker 2>from each of you what you think. This first one

328
00:17:08.160 --> 00:17:10.079
<v Speaker 2>was from a user by the name of Barbara Thompson,

329
00:17:10.720 --> 00:17:15.839
<v Speaker 2>and Barbara said, quote, if you can't remember, like Harris,

330
00:17:15.920 --> 00:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>it may be time to read the Pledge of Alliance,

331
00:17:19.279 --> 00:17:22.880
<v Speaker 2>One Nation under God. We are not forced to believe anything,

332
00:17:22.960 --> 00:17:25.480
<v Speaker 2>but I choose to believe in God, and I lean

333
00:17:25.559 --> 00:17:26.240
<v Speaker 2>on my faith.

334
00:17:26.319 --> 00:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm so grateful to.

335
00:17:27.400 --> 00:17:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Know I'm saved and I'm and saved through Jesus Christ.

336
00:17:32.680 --> 00:17:36.880
<v Speaker 2>And so Barbara was saying that, you know the Pledge

337
00:17:36.880 --> 00:17:40.559
<v Speaker 2>of Allegiance or she said Pledge of Alliance obviously miss

338
00:17:41.480 --> 00:17:45.440
<v Speaker 2>labeling that, but it says one Nation under God right there, Eli,

339
00:17:45.480 --> 00:17:45.680
<v Speaker 2>What do.

340
00:17:45.680 --> 00:17:47.680
<v Speaker 1>You what do you think about this particular commenter?

341
00:17:48.279 --> 00:17:50.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, I like that, somebody replied, because I'm looking at

342
00:17:50.200 --> 00:17:51.960
<v Speaker 5>it right now to you. Somebody replied to me and said,

343
00:17:52.000 --> 00:17:53.359
<v Speaker 5>what is the Pledge of Alliance?

344
00:17:53.400 --> 00:17:55.720
<v Speaker 6>Which I think is hilarious.

345
00:17:56.839 --> 00:18:02.519
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, Barbara, under gone wasn't added until nineteen fifty four.

346
00:18:02.759 --> 00:18:07.640
<v Speaker 5>We know this, right, So just I mean read read

347
00:18:07.640 --> 00:18:08.640
<v Speaker 5>the Pledge of Alliance?

348
00:18:08.839 --> 00:18:11.200
<v Speaker 6>When when should we read the Pledge of Alliance?

349
00:18:11.599 --> 00:18:11.880
<v Speaker 5>Right?

350
00:18:11.960 --> 00:18:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it over because she starts with the comment by

351
00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:18.480
<v Speaker 2>criticizing Kamala.

352
00:18:18.519 --> 00:18:21.640
<v Speaker 5>Harris's right, Barbara, if.

353
00:18:21.559 --> 00:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>You can't remember, yeah, pretty much. Yeah, Chris, what are

354
00:18:24.960 --> 00:18:26.039
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts on that?

355
00:18:26.039 --> 00:18:28.960
<v Speaker 3>That is some Christian projection like at his fondest is

356
00:18:29.000 --> 00:18:33.160
<v Speaker 3>it not? You know, one of the things whenever you

357
00:18:33.200 --> 00:18:35.599
<v Speaker 3>see it's they do that often. They'll come in, like

358
00:18:35.680 --> 00:18:37.519
<v Speaker 3>my comments, I'll place the video and they'll come in

359
00:18:37.559 --> 00:18:40.480
<v Speaker 3>and they'll call me stupid, or they'll attack me personally

360
00:18:40.519 --> 00:18:44.319
<v Speaker 3>with an ad hominem and then misrepresent something or misquote something.

361
00:18:44.319 --> 00:18:46.720
<v Speaker 3>It's it's quite hilarious. I'm glad you found that on that.

362
00:18:47.799 --> 00:18:50.559
<v Speaker 2>You know, it seems like I maybe I just noticed

363
00:18:50.559 --> 00:18:53.240
<v Speaker 2>this more often, but it seems like whenever somebody is

364
00:18:53.720 --> 00:18:57.920
<v Speaker 2>ranting and criticizing the intelligence of somebody else, it seems

365
00:18:57.960 --> 00:19:01.480
<v Speaker 2>to me that they always have a spelling error or

366
00:19:01.519 --> 00:19:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a grammar error, or in this case, they have totally

367
00:19:04.000 --> 00:19:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the wrong word.

368
00:19:05.440 --> 00:19:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's let's cut them a little bit of

369
00:19:07.279 --> 00:19:07.759
<v Speaker 1>slack here.

370
00:19:07.839 --> 00:19:10.599
<v Speaker 2>It might have been something like an autocorrect or something

371
00:19:10.680 --> 00:19:13.039
<v Speaker 2>like that, but come on, double check it before you

372
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:16.720
<v Speaker 2>hit that return key. All right, So let's go on

373
00:19:16.759 --> 00:19:19.160
<v Speaker 2>to this next comment. This is from a user by

374
00:19:19.160 --> 00:19:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the name of c. Name is s I Conacento, Espanol,

375
00:19:24.400 --> 00:19:29.079
<v Speaker 2>and so SE's comment was, the Bible states its hypocrisy

376
00:19:29.119 --> 00:19:32.200
<v Speaker 2>to pray in public. Prayer is a private matter between

377
00:19:32.279 --> 00:19:34.240
<v Speaker 2>one's own self and their God.

378
00:19:34.559 --> 00:19:36.079
<v Speaker 1>Chris, what are your thoughts with that?

379
00:19:37.079 --> 00:19:38.960
<v Speaker 3>I would really appreciate if that. I'll just keep it

380
00:19:38.960 --> 00:19:40.200
<v Speaker 3>to themselves.

381
00:19:41.960 --> 00:19:46.599
<v Speaker 2>Right, Ye'll do what Jesus says, not what Jesus does.

382
00:19:46.759 --> 00:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Right is that?

383
00:19:49.480 --> 00:19:51.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you see that exactly, That's exactly right.

384
00:19:52.079 --> 00:19:56.039
<v Speaker 3>Oftentimes they will they will claim to be people of

385
00:19:56.119 --> 00:19:59.519
<v Speaker 3>peace while swinging a weapon, you know, they they they

386
00:20:00.119 --> 00:20:03.799
<v Speaker 3>talk about being people of love while oppressing other people.

387
00:20:04.519 --> 00:20:07.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm such a glorious I raised my voice up to Christ.

388
00:20:07.680 --> 00:20:10.160
<v Speaker 3>And then they get home and they mistreat their trans

389
00:20:10.240 --> 00:20:13.000
<v Speaker 3>child because they don't like it, or they don't talk,

390
00:20:13.079 --> 00:20:15.920
<v Speaker 3>or they ostracize their their gay child. So there's a

391
00:20:15.920 --> 00:20:20.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of contradiction. It's projection, lies contradiction, it's it seems

392
00:20:21.000 --> 00:20:23.799
<v Speaker 3>to be like a signature move of Christianity. I never

393
00:20:23.880 --> 00:20:26.480
<v Speaker 3>really saw it when I was young, When I was when,

394
00:20:26.720 --> 00:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, it just now that I'm older and I'm

395
00:20:28.759 --> 00:20:32.119
<v Speaker 3>engaging more with them, you know, from my I see

396
00:20:32.119 --> 00:20:33.400
<v Speaker 3>it all the time. I'm like, oh my god, I

397
00:20:33.400 --> 00:20:35.559
<v Speaker 3>can't believe you're really trying to push that off on us.

398
00:20:35.599 --> 00:20:36.799
<v Speaker 3>It's a bunch of young right.

399
00:20:36.960 --> 00:20:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, do you think maybe we're just now we're starting

400
00:20:38.720 --> 00:20:40.519
<v Speaker 2>to push back. I mean, maybe you think they've been

401
00:20:40.519 --> 00:20:42.920
<v Speaker 2>doing it all along. It's just nobody really cared.

402
00:20:43.200 --> 00:20:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, some people I think did care. It's just

403
00:20:45.759 --> 00:20:48.480
<v Speaker 3>our voices are getting stronger, you know. And sometimes they

404
00:20:48.559 --> 00:20:50.319
<v Speaker 3>come in my chat and they're like, oh, hey, you

405
00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:52.559
<v Speaker 3>big mean atheists. I'm like, wait to say, wait, wait,

406
00:20:52.559 --> 00:20:55.640
<v Speaker 3>wait wait, we're the ones we've been we're being oppressed.

407
00:20:55.799 --> 00:20:59.559
<v Speaker 3>We're the ones you're imposing your theocracy on us, and

408
00:20:59.599 --> 00:21:02.480
<v Speaker 3>you come and tell us not to struggle. We should

409
00:21:02.480 --> 00:21:04.960
<v Speaker 3>take this line down. We should be oh yes, sir, yes, sir,

410
00:21:05.160 --> 00:21:08.079
<v Speaker 3>we should what use words? I mean, no, No, you're

411
00:21:08.119 --> 00:21:10.839
<v Speaker 3>trying to impose your theocracy on my wife and my

412
00:21:10.960 --> 00:21:14.200
<v Speaker 3>daughter and my children in schools, and yet you don't

413
00:21:14.200 --> 00:21:17.400
<v Speaker 3>want me to be angry about that, oh angry as

414
00:21:18.160 --> 00:21:21.000
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, there's and of course coming from these people.

415
00:21:21.039 --> 00:21:23.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, they come at us about their arguments about morality.

416
00:21:23.680 --> 00:21:25.759
<v Speaker 3>How can we have morals without God? And then you

417
00:21:25.799 --> 00:21:28.680
<v Speaker 3>look at the things that God, the God itself does,

418
00:21:29.240 --> 00:21:32.160
<v Speaker 3>and you got two thousand years of the followers living

419
00:21:32.200 --> 00:21:35.839
<v Speaker 3>by these morals, of examples of watching them, the horrific

420
00:21:35.920 --> 00:21:38.359
<v Speaker 3>things they do and the have they have a nerve

421
00:21:38.799 --> 00:21:41.960
<v Speaker 3>to say that we can't have morals without God. It's

422
00:21:42.039 --> 00:21:44.440
<v Speaker 3>just there's a lot coming set coming at us, you know.

423
00:21:44.640 --> 00:21:48.039
<v Speaker 1>From I totally agree Eli. I want to read.

424
00:21:48.079 --> 00:21:49.559
<v Speaker 2>I want to read one last comment, and then I

425
00:21:49.599 --> 00:21:51.119
<v Speaker 2>want a quick word from Eli, and then we'll have

426
00:21:51.119 --> 00:21:51.960
<v Speaker 2>to wrap things up here.

427
00:21:52.000 --> 00:21:54.519
<v Speaker 1>This is what was my favorite comment that I read there.

428
00:21:54.680 --> 00:21:56.720
<v Speaker 2>It was from a user by the name of Gladys Vogel,

429
00:21:57.079 --> 00:22:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and Gladys said, people, have you not fear of God?

430
00:22:01.279 --> 00:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>A divided nation will not stand.

431
00:22:03.799 --> 00:22:07.599
<v Speaker 2>Stop your squabbles and show respect and humility for others, ironically,

432
00:22:08.359 --> 00:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>even if you don't agree with their views. Prayer emoji,

433
00:22:11.799 --> 00:22:15.359
<v Speaker 2>heart emoji, Someday we are all going to stand before

434
00:22:15.559 --> 00:22:18.119
<v Speaker 2>and then she switches to all caps someday we're going

435
00:22:18.160 --> 00:22:21.279
<v Speaker 2>to stand before the real judge and give an accounts.

436
00:22:21.480 --> 00:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Eli. Does that put the fear of God in your hearts?

437
00:22:25.839 --> 00:22:29.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it does a little bit, especially how the exclamation

438
00:22:29.480 --> 00:22:31.720
<v Speaker 5>works at the end in the capital letters, because she

439
00:22:31.759 --> 00:22:35.000
<v Speaker 5>didn't stop, she didn't go back to lowercase, she ended

440
00:22:35.000 --> 00:22:38.079
<v Speaker 5>it out with capital. So but you see, I see

441
00:22:38.079 --> 00:22:40.000
<v Speaker 5>stuff like this all the time. And like even if

442
00:22:40.039 --> 00:22:41.799
<v Speaker 5>you go on the videos where it's like, hey, like

443
00:22:41.920 --> 00:22:45.000
<v Speaker 5>here's the reasons why I like the Bibles, I don't

444
00:22:45.000 --> 00:22:46.960
<v Speaker 5>trust the Bible, or like why I don't believe in that,

445
00:22:47.319 --> 00:22:48.880
<v Speaker 5>and then they'll just come in and say things like

446
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:51.720
<v Speaker 5>this like no, I don't have fear of God because

447
00:22:51.920 --> 00:22:52.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't believe in that.

448
00:22:53.039 --> 00:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, fear of what? What? No?

449
00:22:56.759 --> 00:22:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I do, hear it. But all those exclamation points

450
00:22:59.720 --> 00:23:02.359
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, you know.

451
00:23:02.319 --> 00:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>What, until until right this moment, it was a matter

452
00:23:05.759 --> 00:23:06.519
<v Speaker 1>of volume.

453
00:23:06.720 --> 00:23:09.160
<v Speaker 2>That's why I that's why it wasn't clicking in my head.

454
00:23:09.200 --> 00:23:15.279
<v Speaker 2>It's all about the volume, right, Okay, all right, well, excellent,

455
00:23:15.319 --> 00:23:18.000
<v Speaker 2>great discussion. Uh guys, and I think we'll have to

456
00:23:18.000 --> 00:23:20.640
<v Speaker 2>wrap up this, uh this episode here and but it
