Speaker 1: Maybe you saw this little clip from way back in
the day, almost five minutes ago, when Jimmy Comy was
chatting with Nicole Wallace on MSNBC.
Speaker 2: You were back in the middle of a political firestorm.
Speaker 1: Yeah, for walking on the beach with my wife. So
I don't know how we ended up here.
Speaker 3: Never occurred to me that it was any kind of
controversial thing, But that's the time we live in.
Speaker 1: That man is a smug, disgusting swamp rat creep who
wants you to ate him and Democrats you wanted this.
That's Jimmy Comy doing his professional wrestling bits, playing the
heel for Republicans and Conservatives and same people and loving
every second of it thrill of his flesh. Meanwhile, he's
storing up treasures on Earth in the form of book royalties,
TV relevance. Again, I wonder what's going on in the
heavenly realm. Reminder of the Democrats you wanted this. We'll
talk about this with the help of renew dot Healthcare
and through the great courtesy of God Almighty.
Speaker 4: But Todd Herman's show is one disapproved by big pharma
technocrats in tyrn C everywhere from the hind Mountains of
Free America. Here's the Emerald City exime.
Speaker 1: Todd Herman. Today is the day the Lord has made,
and these are the times to which God has decided
we shall live. I'm thinking back to a series of
shows I did way back in the day before we
started doing video, and this is when I recorded the
shows on my own. It was just audio, and we
had this and we had the Radio America Show and
that was the weekend national show and we didn't yet
have the Sepples View Show on American Family Radio. And
it did this series asking how much of what we
see is real? And then another series on what actually
is real. So in that bit there with Jimmy Colemy,
he got to go on MSNBC, as I said, play
the heel. He knows exactly why he's in political hot
water because he wanted to be. He knows he's not
gonna get indicted by the FBI or the Secret Service.
They took him for a little not even purp walk.
They didn't even cuff them. That was for our entertainment,
our satisfaction, our edification. Oh look, Jimmy Colemy got interviewed.
Now maybe maybe maybe they did the perjury trap game
with him, seems to me. Cash Pattel and Dan Begino
told us the other day they've got a lot bigger
things on their plate. After all. They came across and said, oh,
Jeff Epstein, he killed himself, don't you know, after many,
many years of both of them saying, you're insane if
you think he killed himself. But Democrats wanted all of this. See,
I know you wanted this because you did it to others.
You used lawfare against President Trump. You have created blocks
and walls, a massive series of hatreds about President Trump.
You tried to kill him, in my judgment, through planned obsolescence,
planned ignorance, planned incompetence. Look at the people they picked
to guard him in Butler, Pennsylvania, incompetent, people who were
not really trained in guarding presidents. You wanted this, You
wanted this hatred, You wanted it to all be revealed
that it's all very, very fake, even the outrage. La
Monica mcgivert is the representative who was body checking the
DHS officers, in other words, assaulting federal agents. She did
it on video. There's no question that she did it,
and she has been charged and she wanted this. Lamonica
mcgiver said, please charge me when I go and body
check a federal officer. It's not exactly how she said it.
She said it a different way. She said, because President
Musk and Trump thin the above the law, because Lamonica mcgeiver,
the want to be AOC thinks she's above the law.
You wanted this. You wanted it because you continue to
vote for people who act this way. You wanted it
because you funded riots, and then when there was one
from the more conservative, dash populous side, you dispatched every
law enforcement person in Washington, d C. To track down
everybody who even tiptoed into the Capitol and took a selfie.
You wanted this. All of this is what you begged for.
You wanted to be discovered to be frauds because you
defrauded us. And God tells us that everything that's whispered
in the dark will one day be shouted from the rooftops,
and one day could be now that's often viewed only eternally,
you know that's and of course in the new Heaven
and the New Earth, of course, all things are going
to be known because God will make them not. He
tells us that one day. All things, well, today might
be the all things in terms of their fraud. I
remember asking, time and time and time again, when is
some reporter going to simply say to the figurehead, Hey,
pardon me, Why are we in a fake oval office?
Why are we on a sound stage? Why is there
a thirty five foot teleprompter behind you? Why are you
pretending to answer these questions? And so much is coming out?
Praise God, this is what they wanted. When you fake
things on this level, you know they're going to come
out when people just begin to dig into this. There's
some other examples. It has to do with that whole thing.
Remember I've said it's all scripted. Do you remember this?
Guess what it was? All scripted. I'll give you an
example of this in a second. Had an unscripted discussion
yesterday with Wade Lightheart. He is one of the founders
and one of the partners, one of the bosses at Biptomizers,
and I finally paid off a promise I made my
friend Zach Abraham at Borwark Capital. Zach and his wife
began taking mass symes from Bioptimizers. This is the very,
very potent set of digestive enzymes that help your body
digest all foods at the best level, and particularly proteins.
And when Zach and his wife started to take the product,
now about a month ago, they said, all of a sudden,
they started sleeping better. Now, I thought that was because
they weren't bloating, because one of the things that mass
Simes does is it eliminates bloating. But Wade shared something
with me of much much more in depth. This makes
sense for me. So I eat tons of protein, hundred
and sixty grams every day at least, and I've learned
that sometimes I, despite a great sleep protocol, despite taking
this product the right way, I'm not getting them to sleep. Sometimes.
You know what I've been doing, I've been eating tons
of protein before bed. It satiates and I was thinking, well,
this is going to help me get even better sleep.
And I wasn't taking mass Symes just before bed. I
was taking it long before that. What Wade told me
was protein undigested in your body creates these toxins that
actually messes with your mind. It actually sends your mind
to all this. That's exactly what I've been experiencing. My
mind's too active for sleep. So now I've shifted this.
I'm going to continue to eat the proteins, but I'll
take more mass simes before I go to bed. He
also talked about their lab, things they can do there.
We'll get this to you. You see this, there's a
reason that they fund their own lab so that they
can do things that the FDA doesn't want them to
do here, and they got a better safety profile. So
go to Bob Demess dot com slash Todd, use promo
code Todd to get mass simes, help maintain the lean
muscle you have in your body. Might even help you
grow more if you work out and are properly training.
It's bib Demisers dot com slash Todd use promo code
Todd for ten percent off all their products. So there
are now reports and credit where credit's due to Jake
Tapper and Alex Thompson from Axios, who helped cover up
Biden's dementia. They decided to call it a right wing conspiracy.
Jake Tapper, of course, attacked some of the Trump Femily
members for even suggesting that Biden was even a little
bit mentally slow. Now they're playing the game that, oh
we were fooled. Well, there is some decent information in
their book like this, Cabinet meetings were scripted and they
used multiple camera angles so they could also go back
and edit out mistakes. So it wasn't just that Biden
got the name of the so called reporters who had
agreed to act in a play for the nation, because
that's what that was. It was a production. It was
a play. It happened that cabinet members too at cabinet
meetings too, so cabinet members had lines. The figurehead knew
what the lines were, and even then they had multiple
camera angles so that they can go and get clean edits.
And there's some reasons for this. For instance, if someone
flubs their line and the camera angle the main camera
was the figurehead and that person in the frame at
the same time, well that's hard to edit. So they
go to camera B, which is a close up on
the person asking the question, and they go to that.
So they simply shift frames and then they do retake.
So the sit that person down in the chair along
with their other other colleagues if they need them. Everybody
come back into the room. Let's film this again. This
person flubbed a line, they have them go do retakes.
Do you know how expensive that is. You're talking about
the top paid people who are pretending to run the
government doing reshoots and retakes. And this is from doge
automated on Twitter dash X. A twenty twenty three General
Accounting Office audit found two hundred and fourteen million dollars
wasted on communication strategies across federal agencies, funds that could
have secured the border or cut drug costs. Communication strategies.
Why do they need communication strategies. Why don't they just
come and tell us what they're doing. Why do they
need to act it out? Why do they need to
perform plays? Because they wanted this. They wanted a scripted government.
They wanted pretend land. Now I don't think they knew
they wanted it to be found out, but that's what's happening.
So when they accused President Trump of stagecraft, and they
accused him of having all his steps ponned out in advance,
that's far different than putting on scripted place. Now, if
it came to my attention that President Trump was scripting meetings,
I'd be just as upset because we want to see
the true and real deal, which we did. Zelensky I said,
it at the time. To me, that is far preferable
than the plays they've been putting on for us. So
Democrats wanted this. There's much more that they wanted. They
wanted to have President Trump decide to suspend Habeas corpus.
Now he may not need to do that because the
Supreme Court has decided that President Trump can in fact
continue with five hundred thousand deportations, which he is doing.
But there are some precedents, there's some things they wanted.
They wanted the suspension of Habeas corpus by a president
who happened to be republican or populist or conservative. We'll
talk about that in just a second. If you're watching
this live or listening to it or viewing it on
the day at drop, which is the twentieth of May
twenty twenty five. In two days, on Thursday, the twenty second,
my friend Zach Abraham is putting on a free live
webinar and it is entirely devoted to tariffs what they
can do to your retirement if you're five, ten, fifteen
years from retirement. Understand, there has never been at least
as I view it, in our lifetime, there has never
been a more important time to make sure that you
are risk managed because of what President Trump is doing
at an incredibly high level. Or he's trying to remake
the global economy. And I firmly believe if we get
President Trump through four years, meaning that they don't off him,
God willing, and we get Jade Vance's president for eight years,
I do believe you will live in a fundamentally change
global economy. And you know this, shiny sheer Republicans don't
want that change at all. They're slow walking everything. They're
taking all the spending upfront and moving all the savings later.
They want to preserve portions of Obamacare. They don't want
to cut taxes on Social Security. They want to allow
people who live in weird, whacked out left wing cities
to continue to write off their taxes on their federal taxes.
In other words, they want us all to pay the
same tax rate, even states that have reasonable government like Idaho.
Praise God. So in this discussion this free level women
are zach Is going to talk about the tariffs, what
they can do to our retirement, how Bulwark always looks
to lower res how they always look to lower costs,
and why they think actively managing portfolios is the best
way to do that well because in fact, that can
reduce risk and volatility. So here's all you have to
do to register for this free LEVELB but are coming
up at three thirty Thursday of this week. Go to
Know your Risk Radio dot com. That's easy. Know your
Risk Radio koow Know your Risk Radio dot com. But
we're couple of managements and investment advisor representative Truck Financial
LC and SEC registered investment advisor. Investments involve risk and
are not guaranteed past performance, isn't guarantee future results Truck
twenty five. That'sh two zero six. A reminder to Democrats,
you wanted this. You wanted President Trump to suspend Habeas corpus,
So how could I possibly know that? Because you love
it when figureheads, people who are posing as president in
a mass play put on for the pleasure of the nation,
brag about ignoring the Supreme Court.
Speaker 5: The court blocked me from relieving student dead, but they
didn't stop me so far. He leaves student definitely. Five
million Americans.
Speaker 1: So giving a number are black bars.
Speaker 5: So you can chase your dream, start a family, buy
your first home, start a business, and so much more
and guess what. It grows the economy. It strengths the economy.
I'm going to keep it going. The promise made is
a promise cab.
Speaker 6: But we're speaking of speaking of the courts.
Speaker 1: If you're watching this, you have an advantage to people
listening to it. So let me translate something here. That
man was reading every word of that. And if you're
watching this, you can see that that's one of those
times where his eyes are all pupil. They're all black. Now,
of course it indicates that this is a drugged man
said it at the time. What is real is the
alert Biden reel. You want it drugged up? Figure it.
They did this to Soviet leaders, drug them up. And
here he is being told to read from a thirty
five foot teleprompter that he defied the Supreme Court, Meaning
you want President Trump to defy the Supreme Court because
you decided presidents get to defy the Supreme Court. That's
what you decided. Democrats, you also wanted this. You wanted
the constitutional crisis. You have been begging for a constitutional crisis.
Our federal government controls immigration. You've had states like the
separate countries who always talk about the leftist states that
are actually separate countries. They've been ignoring federal laws on drugs,
on narcotics, on immigration. They announced the phrase sanctuary city
a decade ago. They bragged about it. They said to
the federal government, we're not going to participate with you.
We're going to set up our own system. That's a
constitutional crisis. Want what did this? You wanted the setup.
You wanted to create a situation where when the Supreme
Court was hearing arguments about President Trump's birthright birthright Citizenship Order,
which is this insane belief that our founders thought, let's
let anybody who has a baby here instantly make that
baby a citizen, then turn around to make the parents
a citizen, and let's create chain migration through birth. When
this has been going on in the Supreme Court, it's
not really about at this point is birthright citizenship and
actual right within this country? Which I think it's not.
It's really about do we have districts? See, you guys
didn't want districts. You want an all powerful federal government.
You don't want words to mean things. If the founders
had decided to design a system where every judge was
a national judge, why they have spent the time with
this thing called districts. And what does a district mean?
You can go to the root of something by looking
at the words, what's its mission? It's a district court
over which does whole jurisdiction this district It's not a
district's court. You wanted this constitution of crisis. You wanted
a reason for a populist or conservative president to suspend
habeas corpus. This is part of the argument around birthrights, citizenship,
and rogue judges during the Supreme Court discussion. This is
a d John Sower US solicit general or a solicitor general.
Speaker 6: Of such universal injunctions followed.
Speaker 7: Since January twentieth, district courts have now issued forty.
Speaker 6: Universal injunctions against the federal government.
Speaker 7: Including thirty five from the same five judicial districts. This
is a bipartisan problem that has now spanned the last
five presidential administrations. Universal injunctions exceed that power granted an
Article three, which exists only to address the injury to
the complaining party. They transgress the traditional balance of equitable authority,
and they create a host.
Speaker 6: Of practical problems.
Speaker 7: Such injunctions prevent the percolation of novel and difficult legal questions.
Speaker 6: They encourage rampant forum shopping.
Speaker 7: They require judges to make rushed, high stakes, low information decisions.
They circumvent Rule twenty three by offering all the benefits
but none of the burdens of class certification. They operate asymmetrically,
forcing the government to win everywhere while the plaintiffs can
win anywhere. They invert the ordinary hierarchy of ap pellet review.
They create the ongoing risk of conflicting judgments. They increase
the pressures on this Court's emergency docket. They create what
Justice Powell described as repeated and essentially head on confrontations
between the life, tenured and representative branches of government. And
they disrupt the constitutions careful balancing of the separation of POWERMS.
Speaker 1: It's a great statement. It's a great series of harms
that democrats wanted, or I should say, a well elucidated
series of arms. They're not great harms that democrats wanted.
You wanted this stuff. You wanted the constitution of crisis.
Speaker 4: You have it.
Speaker 1: You wanted to give us an argument, as in my case,
a Christian constitutional populist meaning God comes first at the
center of all things, Love the Lords, your God, your
heart with your entire heart, mind, soul, and strength. Love
your neighbor as yourself first above all things. Then constitutional,
because I believe our Constitution was written by men who
recognize the right that we have rights we have that
come because we're created by God. Populist, because it's not
going to happen through Washington, d C. When you have
got the foot dragging back there on President Trump's agenda,
when you've got the propping up of Obamacare, when there
refusing to cut taxes on Social Security, which in fact
is a tax, it's got to be populism. But you
wanted to give me an argument for President Trump to say,
I'm suspending habeas corpus because we have an absolutely infiltrated
and corrupt judiciary. The form shopping is a form of theater.
You're going to a judge where the outcome is known
because the ideology is known. Because the form shop judge
knows why you're there. And this injunction where a district
court gets to skip the process of creating a class
action lawsuit, and that means something that means enough people
were affected that it can come out of a district
and be a nationwide suit. You'll see this all the time.
You'll get these silly emails. I got one the other
day about Facebook spying on me because of the app.
I don't have the Facebook app, but I got a note.
You could be part of a class action lawsuit because
face didn't disclosed this. So that I don't respond to
those things, because I understand the swindle. If they win,
the lawyers get billions of dollars and you get a
free Facebook T shirt. What are they trying to do?
They're trying to build a class of people in this case,
as this list of generals describing there. You can have
seven people go to a forum shopped so called judge
put on a little theater. The judge pretends to hear
the case, pretends to deliberate, it comes back with a
predetermined outcome. Seven people are not a class or anyone
ere we're near it. Boom, here's a nationwide decision. And
then we go through the theater of respecting this, and
we can go through all the reasons once again that
the president represents the entire country, or at least fifty
percent plus one of the electoral college at the very
least senators represent entire states for six years, House of
Representatives parts of a state for two years. Supreme Court
the Nation appointed by a president approved by the Senate.
That's a hierarchy. District court judges appointed nominated by presidents
approved by the Senate for a district. You wanted this,
You wanted to give us an argument for the presidents
of the United States in a case like this to
say I'm suspending Habey's Corpus, just like Abe Lincoln. Did
you even set up the situation? Abe Lincoln was doing
that in Maryland because there were a series of riots
against the federal government in Maryland, as you know, is
across the river from Washington, d C. So he suspended
Habeess Corpus to take the rioters and try them in
military court because they were insurrectionists acting as invaders. What
in the name of all the toly are cartels who
are launching paramilitary operations in our country, including building supply
chains for themselves to circumvent our laws. What are they?
They're invaders performing an insurrection. And there's city and areas
of cities they've seized, fully insurrected, fully fully embedded. You
built it all for us. President Trump, courtesy of you,
has all the reason in the world to say I'm
suspending habeas corpus. And remember if he does it, remember this.
You wanted this not to use a cliche, But what's
that whole thing? Careful what you wish for not to
use a cliche, But what's that whole thing. Elections have
consequences not to use a cliche. But you can only
push a person so far not to use a cliche.
But for every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction,
and that's what you're seeing. Nature abhors a vacuum. Satan
loves a vacuum, loves a spiritual vacuum. Ethics love a vacuum.
You can either fill them ethically or with bad ethics.
Our business climate has created a whole bunch of vacuums.
Big business has a whole bunch of little tricks that
can pull. For instance, big business likes regulation. They like
stack upon stack of regulation, one hundred and forty eight
thousand pages of regulation, because businesses can hire teams of
lawyers to read those regulations weaponize them against their competition.
Startups can't afford that. Small entities can't afford that big
business can hire teams of grant writing specialists to just
go and suck from the teat or if you like
the order of the federal government to got all these grants.
We can't do that as small business owners. But we
can do this. We can stop being suckers at the
poker table with our banks. If you're a small or
medium sized business owner and you set up a corporate
credit card or a debit card, and it has your
name on it, your business name, it looks cool, it
looks legit, but I'm here to tell you that's not
corporate credit. In nine out of ten cases, your bank
will not show you how to set up actual corporate credit.
They want that debit card and their credit card to
be tied to your personal assets. And if God forbid,
you get sued. It's not that they sue your business.
I mean they might start that way, but you've already
pierced your own corporate veil. You've already said I would
like you to go after my house some retirement fund. Please,
you've already said that. My friends at Visible will help
stop this nonsense. In seven easy steps, they will help
you set up actual corporate credit based on your EI
in employe identification number, not your Social Security number. That
form of credit grows more quickly. It will advance your
opportunity to use this to leverage and to help with
cash flow, payroll, et cetera. And they'll do nine out
of the ten steps for you. There's a few steps
they'll leave for you, like setting up the actual credit
in your name. And I'll make you guarantee when you
go to their website, which is gobisible dot com. Visit
gobisible dot com, get the free no obligation consts. You're
going to learn something about corporate credit in your business.
There's a reason after all that. Zach Abraham just put
up a review and it's stellar, five stars. Go bisible
dot com, Go bisible dot com. They wanted this, Democrats,
you wanted us to have this happen. So the newly
appointed head of the Department of Justice Weaponization Working Group
ed Martin. You wanted him in this position, shiny shoe Republicans,
you wanted him in this position. He was about to
be the federal district prosecutor. They just head prosecutor as
prosecutor for Washington DC, the top prosecutor in the district.
But you wanted him in this position. I know that
because you wouldn't approve him for the other position. So
he's announced that as the head of the Department of
Justice Weaponization Working Group, and he said this last Thursday,
he's going to spend some time looking into bar associations
for targeting conservative attorneys. Martin, who says he's being targeted
by the DC Office of Disciplinary Council, told the Daily
Caller News Foundation he wants to expose the quote weaponization
of the bar association against lawyers parv. It is the
monopoly that the bar associations maintain over the practice of law,
and that may have to change, said Ed Martin. Hey,
American Bar Association, you wanted this. I know you did,
because you decided to take a side in a political battle.
The side of authoritarianism, the side of forcing people to
purchase products they don't want from companies they don't like it,
prices they can't afford, of forcing people to get your
approval to be lawyers, of forcing protectionism around the practice
of law, for instance, disappearing the ability for people to
go become a lawyer with anything other than law school.
Used to be that you could apprentice and then become
a lawyer and Incidentally, apprentices pass the bar exam at
a far greater rate than people who went to law school.
But then again, if you're an apprentice, you don't necessarily
get to school people in dei and in licking the
boot of government, which is what you've done. You wanted this,
Maybe you should just say thank you for giving us
what you want. They wanted the drama. They wanted us
to have an invitation to go through and look at
every single action undertaken by the figureheads, and now we
have that. They wanted this. Democrats wanted us to go
look into all the pardons signed by the figurehead. This
is representative James Comer on Fox News.
Speaker 3: You are going and looking at who is controlling this
auto pen because Joe Biden, I mean, he's demonstrating that
he doesn't have all the cognitive capabilities they had. That
interview was from twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's hard evidence. Early in the president Biden's term
as president. It clearly shows that he was in a
significant midtal decline. It questions who was actually making the decisions.
So what we found is not just with the pardons
he issued, but many of the executive orders that the
courts are now using to Trump proof many of the
executive orders that President Trump is trying to implement to
make government more efficient. Many of these executive orders, as
well as the pardons of Biden's entire family, as a
result of our investigation, these were all signed with the
auto pen. And clearly from that interview, which was many
many months prior to the heavy use of the autopen,
Joe Biden wasn't capable of making decisions. He wasn't coherent.
We think we've identified who the staffers are. Jason, you
all have done great work with that over at Heritage Oversight.
We're going to bring everyone that we believe was involved
in any role in the use of the auto pen.
We're going to invite them to come in for a
transcribed interview. If they want, then they will receive a
subpoena and they will have a full blown deposition. But
we want to find out who was actually making the
decisions in the White House during the last nine months
of the Biden administration when he was clearly in mental decline.
Speaker 1: I was listening on the way into public radio just
to hear what they're saying, and in defense of the
people here, they actually quoted a Republican side on this
into looking into Biden, and the Democrats saying, why are
we spending any time looking into Biden. Trump's in the
White House, now, why are we talking about Biden? Then
they brought in a Democrat. I didn't bother to listen
to his curriculum. Vitologist knew what he was going to say,
and sure enough, the Mike came on and said, well,
you know, I'm not losing any sleep over a cover
up that wasn't and he went through that nonsense. Clearly
there was a cover up. So let's answer the question why,
because the policies continue to affect America because all of
the past four years of White House activity was a play.
It was daytime drama, soap opera. Including many of the
acts continue to wasiste down to harmis, including our abilities
to go after some of the people who want us
to go after them. There are people in the technocratic
medical establishment who want us to go after them. I
know that because they broke the law openly. You weren't
allowed to fund the Wuhan lab. You did it through
money laundering, violated a presidential order. That's breaking law, the
Numberg Code. There's not a person in the United States
who has given informed consent. Know one in the United
States received the injection that was approved and then given
the waiver.
Speaker 4: No one.
Speaker 1: I know you want us to go prosecute you because
you openly committed the crimes, you openly engage in the
cover up. So when the autopen went and signed these things,
I know you wanted us to investigate it because you
did it brazenly. How brazen was it? Neuke Gingrich writing
on Twitter, the scale of corruption and manipulation and the
Biden presidency will dwarf any pre his presidency. This is
not about Biden. He clearly had no idea how he's
being manipulated. Pure research reports. On January seventeen alone, he
that is, Biden granted four hundred ninety commutations, more in
a single day than any prior chief executive had granted
over their entire presidency. No one believes Biden decided on
two thousand and four Nightty cases. The question is who
did decide and why did they decide. You can go
through case after case and wind up asking who are
the real presidents in fact behind the cognitively impaired puppet
pretending to be president Susan Rice doesn't have pardon power.
Doctor or Jill Biden, who's not a doctor, doesn't have it.
Hunter Biden doesn't have it. Whichever staffers decided to seize
it don't have it. Those pardons. If we can prove
Biden had no idea, or prove that the auto pen
was used illegally, those pardons are gone. I know that
they wanted us to ask questions of the New York Times.
I know the New York Times wanted to give us
excuses to talk more about their lack of honesty. I
know that because they did things like this New York
Times for Joe Biden, what seems like age might instead
be style. In this respect, the President has something in
common with Beethoven, Vagner and Martin Scorsese. Absolutely, Beethoven was
known to forget what he was playing. I know that
they wanted us to be able to reach into the
recent political history and do things like this. This is
from CNN. This is Adam Schiff talking about Robert Hurr,
who simply did his job as a special investigator, simply
went to talk to the figurehead, did not interrupt the
figurehead when he dissembled and lost himself for fifteen minutes
when all the question was was where did you store
these documents? That's all the question was, Adam Schiff on CNN.
What part of that?
Speaker 4: I mean?
Speaker 1: I assume you think he's sympathetic and well meaning. He's
eighty one, and his memory, you know, it doesn't seem great.
It's not horrible, but I don't understand the outrage well
as simple as this.
Speaker 8: As a prosecutor, the department policy is you don't go
out of your way to essentially vilify, injured the reputation
of someone when you're making a declination decision.
Speaker 1: What you put that's Adam Schiff QUT various times has
said he has seen proof that President Trump is a
Russian asset. At various times he said he's seen it
with his own eyes. He has said at various times
he's seen proof that people like Mitt Romney didn't pay taxes.
He just can't show it to us. So as a prosecutor,
got it, Let's let him continue your report.
Speaker 8: Is just what's necessary to support the conclusions of the reports.
So fair game to say he was asked about these
documents and didn't recall how they got to the university.
It is not appropriate to engage in a subject active, generalized,
essentially political assessment that has foddered during a campaign year.
Speaker 1: And he knew.
Speaker 8: Exactly what he was doing when he chose that language.
You know, he has conducted, I'm sure as any lawyer
with his experience, dozens and dozens of depositions. I deposed
Karl Rove for the Judiciary Committee. He claimed to a
failure of recollection dozens and dozens of times. There was
ever suggestion that he was doing it because of his
advanced age.
Speaker 1: That was simply gratuitous. The age thing is so material.
There are eighty one year olds who are sharper than
any of us. It was about the dementia and Adam
Schiff saying that politicians saying, I don't recall. Yes, it's
a dodge. That's not what Biden did. Biden demonstrated he
did not know what year his son died. You know,
body denied. You know, it went from the Senate to
being president. Oh yeah, and then as Stafford jumps in
and says, what you're and incidentally, in that entire discussion
of the timeline where he hid those documents, or didn't
really hide them, stored them. Do you know that he'd
never once mentioned being vice president. He went from in
his mind senator to president. Of course, he was never president,
he was figurehead. I know that they want us to
be able to go right back through their history and
point out that there is no principle, there are no principles,
there's no guiding morals. I know that Matt Iglesias, who
has been a liberal so called journalist for a decade,
very successful guy in that sphere. I know that Matt
wants us to go and point out that he is
bought and sold by the left. I know that because
he posted this. On March age twenty twenty four, Robert
Herr putting out in a report to a line with
new Goop talking Points, explaining this time he's not indicting
Biden because he talks too loudly, then too energetically. That's
what her said. Biden speaks too loudly, and he's got
too much energy. He said. He's a frail old man
with a terrible memory, sympathetic figure to the jury, but
not able to testify because he can't remember her any details.
But remember he was still okay having the nuclear codes
and the button because he never had it. Ask yourself
a question, do you honestly think that Biden ever carried
the nuclear football? No, ask yourself a question. Those people
live in this world too. Cammy Harris has her friends
and people she loves in addition to a husband. She tolerates.
Everyone in the White House staff, everyone in the joints,
chiefs of staff, have people they love. They've got kids,
they've got business interests, they've got their own lives. You
honestly think they gave that man the nuclear football? Who
had it? There's not a chance it was him, because
if God forbid he had needed to defend us with
nuclear weapons, do you think he would have been the
least bit capable of carrying out the complex order of
things necessary to be able to launch a nuclear weapon?
Does anyone believe that? I think we should be asking
who actually carried it. I know this. I know that
the medical profession wants us to continue to point out that,
even past COVID, they have yet to hit bottom. I
know that because of what they said on CBS News
a medical contributor, and what they said here does not
make any bit of sense. It isn't the least bit believable.
And I'll share that here in just a second. It's
not medical, but it is in fact hygienic, and that
is how you take care of your body's cleanliness. You
can do that through working with great, big, huge companies
that in all likelihood don't care a whit about you.
You are an afterthought. You are in fact someone they
simply want to con into buying their stuff. And then
just by habit, why did buy dovesap? Because why do
you buy old spices? Cause my dad? And then have
you ever looked at the ingredients are where it's made?
Speaker 4: Now?
Speaker 1: So shift gears and make this the day you finally
do it. Alan SOPs is made in America. It's all natural,
no no no chemicals in this. It's very gentle in
the skin, and it's made in America by family that
has done this now three going on four generations, because
they love making soap. The fragrances are invented by a
young guy that the world has already rejected. He can't
work for us, but he works at Alan's. He's fruitful. Incidentally,
Alan just got invited to his first prom, big big
deal for him. He's super excited about that. He's been
through eighteen operations and he's just fourteen, nonverbal. His brother
works there, also impacted by autism. So does Amy. So
shift gears make this the time you decide to have
hygiene for your body in a way that honors God.
Go to Alan Soaps dot com slash Todd get tempercent
off all their products there. That's Alan Soaps dot Com,
slash Todd CBS News a medical contributor there, and former
Biden transition official talked about how come they didn't know
Biden had the cancer real bad.
Speaker 7: It took a while to do that would need be
getting regular checkups.
Speaker 9: Yeah, so it depends on the kind of cancer you're
talking about here. We do know it's quite aggressive.
Speaker 1: Again, so that's doctor Selene Gelnder, editor at Large for
Republic Healthcare at KFF, and she will continue.
Speaker 9: So the time in which it would take to spread
to the bones is going to be shorter than with
a less aggressive cancer. And he's eighty two. Normally doctors
will stop screening for prostate cancer at seventy five or
so because after that, the prostate cancers you typically pick
up are very slow growing, and so the harms of
all of the testing and treatment for something that may
not kill you, you know, you're talking about risk pursus benefit.
It may not be worth the risk.
Speaker 1: Isn't there a blood wait worth the risk? It's the
risk of a prostatic to him, the risk. I mean,
it's not fun, but the risk. And one of the
people at CBS, to their credit, knows there's a blood
test for this, and he asked that question. Isn't there
a blood test that men can take to know if
they have an issue that might warrant further examination.
Speaker 9: So there's something that we call a PSA test, but
that can also be indicative of many different things. It
could just be you have an enlarged prostate. Maybe you
have a low grade infection in the prostate. There are
many things that can cause that. And so this is
again why after a certain age doctors will typically stop
screening for prostate cancer. But in his case, it's not screening.
It's important to emphasize this was diagnostic because he had
urinary symptoms and so there was a reason to do
more testing quickly.
Speaker 1: What is but they didn't. There was a reason, but
they didn't. Does anyone believe that the guy who was
charged with being figurehead didn't get every possible test? Does
anyone believe that I'm in my late fifties. Single quarter,
I go in and get my blood tested every single quarter.
Every single quarter, Doc Jen looks to see if I've
got anything indicating any issues with my prostate. Last time around,
I found out I had some insulin resistance, which was
surprising to me. And until I really thought about how
many supplements I take and how much protein I ate,
and how I've sacrificed eating plants. I'm not getting enough fiber,
then it made sense. Okay, got I know how to
correct that, and this is something I'm paying for out
of pocket. This is a blood test. Yes, it can
be indicative of many things, But you really think that
the guy who was acting as president didn't have this,
given that he had symptoms. Democrats, you wanted to assass
these questions. You wanted us to figure out how fake
you were because you did it so obviously mockingbird media.
You wanted us to run reels like this time and
time and time again. You wanted to be relevant, You
wanted to be seen in the future. Here you are,
aren't your tape right now? Because I'm about to tell
you the truth, and that few if you can't handle
the truth, this version of Biden is the best Biden ever.
Speaker 5: He knows so long.
Speaker 1: In fact, I think he's better than he's ever been. President.
Biden has a photographic memory. His understanding and mastery of
a complicated geopolitical situation remarkable.
Speaker 2: He is sharp, intensely probing, and detail oriented and focused.
Speaker 10: Jackie you here where Jackie was sitting standing standing two
feet from him across the table, and he was, you know, intense.
Speaker 5: It's got trouble walking sometimes, Yeah, so did that FDR.
Speaker 1: He wanted gd war. But he's totally focused. He's very sharp.
Speaker 8: They say he's sharp in meetings and so on, very lucid, well,
very well informed.
Speaker 6: Biden's stately.
Speaker 1: He comes with gravitas.
Speaker 2: There hasn't been, as far as I know, a single
claim that Biden made a mistake.
Speaker 1: Agism is an issue. American have a rich history of
holding people's physical characteristics against them. Okay, you can ask
African Americans.
Speaker 6: He's older. That doesn't mean that he is unfit.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of ages in there. Now, this
age attack, this obsession by the right, Joe Biden may
not be able to speak for himself the way that
he used to.
Speaker 5: They want to think is to take on government if
we get out of line, which they're talking on again about,
and that's him lying around.
Speaker 1: I think people should be speaking up for Joe Biden.
Americans and reporters in the media are just judging him
by a physical appearance, and it's form of the unfair eight. Yeah,
it had nothing to do with the fact that he
couldn't string together a sentence. Democrats, you wanted this. The
phrase is everything whispered in the dark will one day
be shouted from the rooftop. That's a biblical phrase and
it's very very common to think, well, that means in
the afterlife, and then you have it in the new earth. Okay,
everything will one day be shouted, but maybe days today.
And if you're a Democrat and he's saying I didn't
want any of this, why did you vote for it?
It was impossible for you to not recognize you were
voting for people who backed riots, who backed judicial insurrection,
who back to figurehead, who refused to follow what the
Supreme Court decided, who was not running things, who was
clearly putting in a play for our entertainment. If you
didn't want it, why did you vote for it? I
know it's the alternative, but because the other side. Okay, okay,
we'll talk about that on a later show. This is
the Todd Hermann Show. Please go, be well, be strong,
be kind, and please make every effort to walk in
the light of Christ.