Speaker 1: What is up, fella, Siko's im Damp Valley coming at
you with the one, the only, the certified fantabulous. My
co host, mister Grant Hughes, we're here again just to
ask questions. Hashtag wj AQ. When we have enough videos
out there, you could, I mean, there's a hashtag, go
search it, start the hashtag wj AQ and subscribe to
us across all platforms while you're at it. Our question
of the day is can the Bucks salvage their future
with the honest based on reporting that a lot from
the steinlines saying that they are intent ongoing big game
hunting on the trade market. Now, some of the names
that have been mentioned don't really qualify. Zach Levine, Jeremy Grant,
that's not Those aren't needle movers. If you're trying to
keep you honest, I think the idea is to get
a bigger name. The fundamental question here, though, Grant off,
that is, are you looking to do that now when
you can only trade? And we'll get at the end
to what we think the Bucks should do, But do
you do that now when you could trade one first
round pick or you wait until the summer when you
really go all in and you can trade your twenty
twenty six draft pick, which could be pretty high even
though you don't technically control it, plus a two thousand
and thirty one and two thousand and thirty three draft pick.
Speaker 2: I think it depends on the name you're talking about.
Speaker 1: I'm be honestly curious as to who's the best player
the Bucks could acquire this season just because they only.
Speaker 2: Have the one first round pick to trade.
Speaker 1: But if you were the Bucks and this is the
path you have to go down, is you're making this
big swing? Are you doing it now when you know that? Well,
like you, Giannis is here. I know he's as we're
recording this. He's still injured, but he's here and we
could technically, in theory, get two playoff runs if they're
able to sneak in there. Or is it we're really
gonna wait for when our best, best type of offer
is on the table this summer.
Speaker 3: And do you do it now because you don't think
you will get the chance to make that bigger offer later?
Right Like it might be do something now or you
if nothing materializes and there's enough time before the deadline,
Giannis finally does and the staring contest and say trade me,
and that, obviously is that changes this conversation. It eliminates
this conversation. The other thing to keep in mind, too,
is if you do the now trade, the one first trade,
obviously you don't have three firsts and others like this
is this is like you've got to make the less
impactful move now. If you have to, that means you
cannot make the more impactful move later. There might not
be a later, So that that is the threshold question.
And you can't answer that question and we won't quite
yet without looking at like, okay, so what are we
talking about if you make this trade now to the
go for it trade, the big game hunting trade, it's
I mean, obviously that's a joke, like you're not hunting
big game with a single first and the bucks salaries
that they have to move. But we need to kind
of hone in on like what what's that actually look like?
Because what because the answer to that question I think
informs pretty strongly whether you should do it now or
whether you should say, like, well that all those players suck,
like we gotta wait until we can move three first
and do something more consequential. Right, So maybe the move
now is to look at some of the options that
might be on the table and discuss how meaningful those
might be in the one pick kind of packages.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And I think the only other thing I can
think of is is there an element of being able
to do it twice? Where is there something you could
do where if you're trading one first round pick now
and then you can trade two first round picks over
the summer, is can you get both? It's depending on
where the are twenty and twenty six pick lands. The
answer might be yes. But I think you're looking at this.
If you're the Bucks doing this and we're not even
necessarily advocating for it, this is your last gasp and
so like the move needs to be the caps lock move. Yep,
so our first name, we don't know how they're gonna
pop up on the screen people, So this is this
is gonna be quite fun. Our first name Trey Young.
How do you feel about that? I don't think so.
I it be easy breakdown is that a cannot be
a now thing or an offseason thing.
Speaker 2: I almost lean towards could it be ano how thing?
Speaker 3: Could it be a never thing? I think if it so,
if it's now you're telling me you're getting tray for
a first in salary. Kuzma's in there, Yeah, Turner, Turner's
in there. Who. Yeah, I don't know. I don't love
Trey Young. I don't know that. I believe him to
be better than Lillard was before Lillard got hurt, and
the Bucks weren't that great with Lillard there. If you
can hold on to Turner, which I'm not sure how
you would do that, then Young Jannis Turner is interesting
to me, even if Turner hasn't been what they hoped
this year. I don't know how much better do you
think you can do bottom line player wise if you
hold onto these picks. I think Young Young's like, he's
not my favorite, but for one first that's not that's
I'm interested.
Speaker 1: I probably would be interested too, but I just don't
think it's the right name to keep you honest beyond
this season.
Speaker 3: Well, that's interesting you say that that way, because, like,
name wise, Young is still a big one. I don't know.
I don't know how good Trey Young is anymore, but
like the name carries a lot of value, and if
the goal is to impress you, honis that's fairly impressive.
Speaker 1: I guess it's just the sheer salary matching of it all.
I guess the Bucks have some flexibility. So if we
operate under the assumption that it's Kuzma at twenty two
point one, and if you're willing to put yeah, I
mean that's thirty six million, thirty five and a half
million between Kuzma and Bobby Portis.
Speaker 2: I know the Bucks have some flexibility.
Speaker 1: But Trey Young's on the books this season for forty
six million dollars. Yeah, so you're almost You're there if
you can keep Turner and it's the one first round pick.
I don't know who else is still on your team,
but if it's Ryan Robbins, Turner, Giannis, and Tray and
you've gave him up the first round pick, I might
consider it.
Speaker 3: I do like Rolins next to Trey too. That's another
that's another factor. Yeah, that's you're giving up a lot
of players. But I mean, this is this again, that's
what the Bucks are just like, get get a guy.
So yeah, I don't This isn't a no brainer by
any stretch, but I'm kind of surprised I actually didn't
immediately turn it down.
Speaker 2: Next up, does LaMelo Ball do it for you. I
mean I think, well, you.
Speaker 3: Know you're gonna go. I mean, he's more intriguing than Trey,
and just from the Bucks perspective, you kind of get
it both ways here because he's under contract for longer,
he's younger. You. If this doesn't work, at least you've
still got him as like, this is the guy we're
selling now after we trade Giannis. And it makes sure
Yanni's trade fairly simple too, because you've got a new age,
like you know, band to kind of build your team around.
So that's if we're talking one first, that's the thing.
I don't think he's an off Yeah, he's a three
first guy.
Speaker 2: I don't mean yeah.
Speaker 1: I don't know if he might be a one first
guy depending on where the twenty twenty six pick lands,
that could be interesting. I think more of the stories
for him, I think it would be getting to his
salary numbers a lot easier this season. But I think
you need to be in the off season and have
the flexibility of either multiple picks or you know, where
you're twenty twenty six.
Speaker 3: And then he's an example of you can't do both.
It can't be a small trade with one of your
first now and then he's the guy. Yeah, you got
to Yannis. Hey, Hank tight, we got we got something
in the pipeline. Just hold out for the year. That's tough.
Speaker 1: And if you're if you're worried about Giannis's injury history, boy, yeah,
we have a player for you right next up, joh woops,
you already did Dre Young.
Speaker 2: Well, Anthony Davis.
Speaker 3: It's a big number to get to you again, right,
So this is I mean, presumably Turner is gone in
this deal, as is Kuzma. That gets you about ten
million short. I think of Davis.
Speaker 1: So maybe Kevin Porters are in there. Yeah, you keep
Portis you make him as at thirty five. The Bucks
are so far underneath the tacks that that probably works,
though Kuskott, Turner and KPJ. Yeah, are the MAVs more concerned?
What do they want back for? They probably want back
more if you're not including Ryan Rollins, which if I'm
the Bucks in this trade, I would not, And none
of the names we've mentioned I think are moving me
to get I mean, if if Charlotte said Ryan Rollins
and the pick right now plus salary for LaMelo, I
think about it.
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna lie I.
Speaker 3: It's a fit thing to me. I think, well, because
look like between Brook Lopez and the theory of Miles Turner,
there's just a certain kind of big you want to
play next to Giannis, and Davis isn't that guy, So
like I would worry that offensively Davis would be in
the way is like two strong statement. But he's not
in the same places that that these other centers that
have been successful with Giannis have been. And he's also
like maybe you just don't get the most out of him.
Speaker 2: I already's been working on his jump shot.
Speaker 3: Oh do you see that video? Tantalized? I think it
was in standard definition. It's so old at this point
of a you know what I mean? Though, Like, I
don't know if you're getting the best out of either
of Giannis or a d if they're together. So and
then like probably you're you're not getting him with a
one pick trade.
Speaker 1: I don't think if you can, you probably just do
it though, right if it's the one pick, I'm not
giving up. Just the fit doesn't make sense, And then
Honness does still want out. You don't have as many
escapes because Anthony Davis is old and approaching free agency.
Speaker 3: So if you can for one and matching salary, I
think I'm okay with it. I just and then that's
presuming you're going to use those other two picks for
a wing. I guess yeah, I don't. I don't love
the fit. LaMelo is still the leader here.
Speaker 2: I think LaMelo's the clubhouse leader. Who's next?
Speaker 3: Though?
Speaker 2: Grant Donovan Mitchell? This is interesting.
Speaker 1: So he has only one more guaranteed year on his
contract because he's the player option in twenty twenty seven.
Eight calves are belly up right now. I don't know
three first round picks might get you in the Donovan
Mitchell conversation if he wants to play with Giannis. I
don't know if the Bucks are making a wish list.
If Donovan Mitchell has one, that would be fascinating. It's
not a this season thing, so it's an off season thing.
Speaker 3: I also don't even know if what the Bucks could
offer if they wait, is gonna be like if Mitch.
If there's a Donovan Mitchell market, I think there's not.
Just see what the Bucks can where's that pick?
Speaker 1: If it's three, Cleveland's not gonna care where don Mitchell
wants to play if the Bucks are throwing it on
the table or something.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I don't know. I mean, if the only
thing I'm certain about is that this is a you
can't do it till the summer. I wonder if Garland
could be had for cheaper.
Speaker 1: And soon he might be somewhere in this pool of players.
But relative to the players we've spoken about, would you
prefer the LaMelo ball path or you go all in
and you get Donovan Mitchell this summer.
Speaker 3: I think Mitchell has to be the choice because he's
just LaMelo has not come close to Mitchell's level. Mitchell's older.
I think if from Giannis, if you're trying to impress you, honest,
I think Mitchell goes a lot farther there because like,
there's not the there's not the like, well, the cool
thing about LaMelo is he could just be, you know,
the next era. You're not making that argument with Mitchell.
Speaker 1: Darius Garland, So I don't think I while he might
be cheaper, I don't think Darius Garland is a this
season thing either, though that's still a summer. Forget about
Cleveland being willing to move him. I just don't think
the one first round pick and Ryan Rollins is gonna
get anywhere in the realm of the best. Darius Garland offer.
Speaker 3: No unless unless, like Dan Gilbert just is like enough
with this, We're the only second a. We gotta get
way cheaper and we do a Celtics level kind of
sell off, which likes you know, the downgrade the moment
from Garland to Rollins is not is there one like
just based on how they've played this year, but both
of them.
Speaker 1: The other thing too with Garland that you don't get
with Mitchell. It's similar to the LaMelo thing and maybe
even with the injuries at this point, but you have
the bridge to the future if Yannis still wants out,
whereas with Donovan Mitchell you don't.
Speaker 3: Three it's a three year difference. Garland's three years younger.
That's that's huge, especially since the difference between late twenties
and early thirties and mid twenties.
Speaker 1: Can I be honest, I think he's my I think
here LaMelo or on my pick so far right now,
because I don't know that you would need to give
up everything, and even if you did, I think both
of these guys you could keep Ran Rollins with. I'm
not giving up Brian Rollins for either one of these
two players and just the time horizon, because Giannis has
proven so inconsistent with his allegiance over the past couple
of years. That appeals to me more than Donovan Mitchell
gives you the singular biggest season chance of winning a
title with Giannis again.
Speaker 3: But now, if you're Cleveland in this, I know this
is a Bucks focused exercise, Why aren't you saying what'll
it take for you to give us Jannis? Like, do
you think Giannis might want to come over here and
play with Evan Mobley and one of Garland or Mitchell?
Like that?
Speaker 2: That?
Speaker 3: I mean that At that point, I feel like Cleveland's
gonna say, hold on, we were not like we won
sixty whatever games. Why aren't we trading for the big Well?
Speaker 1: What is the offer? Well, because Yannis the offer? So
you're giving either Garland and then your your tradeable first
round picks, which will be let's say two or three.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I guess maybe they don't have enough unless they
trade mobiley which what's why would you do with the
point be.
Speaker 1: I think you can even make a case from a
Bucks perspective just based off this season. Do you want
Mobley as your center, because how much Mobley is doing
all of the heavy lifting in any honest trade, as
he should, but you have to be sure that he
is the.
Speaker 3: Guy, right and right, Yeah, that would be, Yeah, that'd
be He's not in a weird way. It's easier to
sell like we got LaMelo than it is we got
Mobile because everybody would be like, all right, so who's
actually gonna like run the show? If you're getting Mobile,
Giannis is gone too, and right kind of yeah, that doesn't.
Speaker 2: Next name Kyrie Irving, this would be interesting.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I mean not gonna This could be a
this year thing obviously, if you could.
Speaker 1: Get Kyrie without giving If so it's just the one
first round pick, the idea would be we have Kyrie,
Yannis and then whatever this twenty six pick, which will
be the Pelicans or the Bucks his own turns into
mm hmm.
Speaker 2: That's I don't.
Speaker 3: Hate, I mean in terms of I mean, hi, the
best version of Kyrie is better than LaMelo, I think
is better than Garland. And you're really just this is
a lightning in a bottle situation. Right, You're trying to
you're hoping Kyrie and Yannis and whatever else you got
magically stay healthy for a playoff run, which is if.
Speaker 2: Other injury pro players can we talk about it?
Speaker 3: But yeah, I know, I mean, are we being are
we just being ridiculous and assuming that the version of
Kyrie we get back will be Kyrie you know at
this age with a cl now like being ridiculous.
Speaker 2: But it's not outside the rumble possibility.
Speaker 3: Okay, yeah, possible, maybe not.
Speaker 1: It's a relative to the cost of oh, we get
to keep our other two tradable first round picks over
the offseason, if we're just giving up the one pick now,
and maybe that's how you sell Giannis on the gap
here too, is look who's going to be here next
season healthy Kyrie?
Speaker 3: Yeah yeah, No, I mean what this is kind of
teaching me is, well, we're we're starting to exhibit signs
of leaning towards some of these do the do the
move for the one pick now. We haven't we have
come come down officially yet, but it seems like this
that's where we're leaning.
Speaker 1: We got six or seven names left, though, the first
of which is Kawhi Leonard. So I'll say this, Kawhi
Leonard might be the single most intriguing player to talk
about to this point, if it's at this season thing, sure,
because I'm not giving up more than one first round pick.
First of all, is he coming? Is he gonna retire?
Is he gonna report work?
Speaker 3: I think again where I'm feeling, I can feel myself
ramping up to over using the term. So I'll try
this will be the last one. I'll have to come
up with a different one. But the lightning and a
bottle thing like Kawhi last as recently as last postseason,
gave us a few games where it was like, oh shit,
like he's he's a top five guy. You can't do
anything with him on either end? Can how much of that?
If you told me that you would get that Kawhi
for and he doesn't just shut it down and it's
over like every third playoff game with the Bucks, and
you're honest, I think I would take it. And I
think you could make the case that's more impactful than
like what any other guy that we've talked about could provide,
maybe other than like Mitchell, but Mitchell's not a one
first guy. Kawhi might be.
Speaker 1: The thing that worries me is I'm almost more peeled
to someone who you're Okay, if you're getting them this season,
you're okay with this season not turning into anything because
you've increased the vale in theory, you're probably still getting
you've increased the value of that pick. By default, you're
even less favorable of your own or the Pelicans, and
so if you can sell it, Kawhi is not he's
healthy ish, so like that's this is a that's a
very much requiring him because we want to win in
one of the next two seasons where I think literally
every other player just because Kyrie's injured. I know he's older,
but every other player by default, maybe with the exception
of Anthony Davis, has been a we don't need it
to be this year.
Speaker 3: Well, and then maybe that is the way to look
at it, because so far there's nobody the Bucks really
can't get anyone this for this season that you would say,
uh oh, they're definitely like that, they're definitely the best
team in the East now or any like That's that's
just not going to be possible. I don't Maybe Kawhi
comes closest because if you could just at the right moment,
maybe you know, he's probably better than any of the
other guys we've discussed as a possible one first rounder
kind of return.
Speaker 1: But just like there are five losses out of the
playoff picture in the East, the player like the top set.
Speaker 3: A benefit of Kawhi being the choice is that he
might just give you zero for this season and then
you still have him for next year and your pick
is better.
Speaker 1: I'm saying it's the opposite because because you know him
more so than anyone, because you're worried about the availability
moving forward, and do we think that does he get
to the end of this season and then request a
trade out of Milwaukee? You have to do it like
you need to go for it this season because with
everyone else, you're kind of in a situation where they're
either young enough where their timeline doesn't demand it's this season,
or you're not worried about necessarily them requesting a trade
over the summer or getting injured again like a Donovan Mitchell.
Speaker 2: You're not worried about him getting it.
Speaker 1: You're not, you know, So his is if the Bucks
were a little bit further up the standings, I would
love the Kawhi idea, But this just feels is it
too late or am my underestimating the wide openness of
the Eastern Conference.
Speaker 3: I would just respect it as from a boldness perspective,
So like you're yeah, I mean it just would be.
And again I know it shouldn't cost that much because
that's I mean, he's not bad money, but like it's
not great. It could be.
Speaker 2: James Harden.
Speaker 3: Okay, that's it.
Speaker 2: That's another this season season things.
Speaker 3: I do we talk about fit again? Do we do?
We do? We love the ball dominance to a greater
degree than like Lillard and certainly than Holiday in years past.
Does that Does that negate some of Gianni's value?
Speaker 2: Probably?
Speaker 1: But also Jannis is a play finisher is terrifying in itself.
And who is is he? The Is James Harden the
best passer we've named? Maybe Trey or LaMelo would be
the other options he would be.
Speaker 3: He's the Yeah, he's the he'd be the best passer
Giannis has played with. I think that's pretty He.
Speaker 1: Did say that one time Giannis has no bag though,
that he's just seven ft tall.
Speaker 2: Do you think that's that could create some locker room.
Speaker 3: He's also motivated to prove that he has a bag,
and that's why this thing would implode.
Speaker 1: I'm anti James Harden just for the reason of there's
too many variables where it's he is the option for
next season, and I just wonder.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, and like just if this is this year
thing for a number of reasons, you can't. He's his
playoff record is what it is? You can't And like,
so what are you selling Giannis? If if if it's
the James Harden pitch and it's like we might.
Speaker 2: Show them, it's probably easy to sell him on James Harden.
Speaker 3: I don't know what's Kuzma's playoff track record? Is he
defined by how bad a champion? Yeah, oh, that's well done, deal,
Kuzma's better than Harden. No, I don't know. Like in
my mind, I'm just putting a ceiling on how far
a Harden led team can go, and that's not far
enough to justify like Kawhi is more appealing to me?
Speaker 2: Is James hard?
Speaker 1: James Harden's playoff highs just aren't even high enough to
where it's some of like the inefficiency stuff might be
overstated when you break it down game by game, but
it's just how many conference finals is this like? And
how many how many memorable games do you have of
where it's he didn't take enough shots or he didn't
get he took shots and it wasn't enough, and it's
just the reactions afterwards haven't helped him.
Speaker 2: They've kind of added to the lore of how bad
that people think he is.
Speaker 3: In the postseason, it almost feels self fulfilling at this point,
where it's just like, yeah, which is kind of irrational,
but give me Kauhi over Harden.
Speaker 2: Jaron Jackson Junior. That's an offseason thing. You're not getting
Jaron j for one first round.
Speaker 3: It is the player type though, the if assuming it's
this is one of the years that he can shoot
yeah and you do get yeah, it's it's a little
more like the Mobili thing than the LaMelo thing because
he's not well. I don't know, though we've seen again
with Jackson who knows man, you do get some of
the from scratch stuff and he was very successful at that.
Speaker 1: Mike, even with mobiley self creation having improved, I don't
think he's ever been at the level of Jaron Jackson
Junior was in twenty twenty four, twenty five.
Speaker 2: As a creator.
Speaker 3: No agree, Yeah, I would do it.
Speaker 1: I think if it's the three, it probably has to
be the three picks this summer I would do, and
then Giannis and Jackson Junior are kind of an intuitive
fit on the defensive end. Maybe you're a little bit
worried about the rebounding at that point, But is it
that different from Turner and Johannis.
Speaker 3: No, that's the thing. I don't think it's meaningfully worse.
If you can keep Rolins and you've got that's pretty good.
That's a that's a good fit. I mean, I like
that fit better than Anthony Davis and Younger. Yeah, I
think that's that's one of the better you're waiting for
the full like three pick package options for sure.
Speaker 2: Devin Booker definitely a summer thing, f.
Speaker 3: Y, I summer of what year? Like that's interesting. So
this is the first like in prime like first option
creator type that we've covered, right, I guess I guess
Mitchell would be that guy. Yeah, yeah, I mean I
don't know if they can even get him, Like, I
don't I don't know that they could have the best. Again,
it depends on how good that pick is, because Bookers
what a couple of years younger than Mitchell. Maybe it's
just one.
Speaker 2: At this point, Devin Booker is twenty nine years.
Speaker 3: Old, same age pan. Time flies, but he's under this longer.
Speaker 1: Right, But that is that part of the problem when
you look at the way that his scoring efficiency has dropped.
I still think he's a great passer, and I just
wonder in a different just having another co star I
think would do a ton for the quality of looks
he's getting.
Speaker 2: But that has to be a concern for sure.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I might. I mean, I think I might
favor Mitchell. He's playing better right now. He's under contract
for or term and is what is it the twenty
nine to thirty bookers on the hook for sixty nine
million dollars. That's nice. He's gonna have him. He needs
great for him, He's gonna need to play a lot
better than he's played this year to justify that. Yeah,
interesting one.
Speaker 1: We next up have John rant That's that. That could
be a this season thing, maybe perhaps.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, do you even need to give up a first?
Oh man? What if? What even Memphis is like, we're
out of the job business. Give us Ryan Rollins and
the salary we need. You can hold onto all those picks.
Speaker 1: That gets interesting, probably does, But that's I really like.
Speaker 3: Ryan Rollins I think Ryan Rollins is a starting point guard, like.
Speaker 1: But you could you couldn't rationalize it by saying he's
going to be He has a player option after next season,
so it's he's cost controlled for not really that much longer.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's how you justify I just Jaw fits the.
Speaker 1: Idea of this is a next seas he's in thing
that we're getting this season because he's out, and so
if you want to use a gap year, then you
have a high pick with Jaw and Yannis. I didn't
think I was going to be as intrigued by this
one as I am.
Speaker 3: But well, yeah, let me dumb some cold water on it. One.
I don't think an offense can function with Jaws shooting
limitations and honises because like they just Jaw's off ball
value is zero because he doesn't cut. No one's guarding
him as a shooter, so like you're really allowing another
defender to be in Giannie's way and then you and
then you must have a spacing center like in addition,
so like I guess Turner can fulfill that role. But
like the fit sucks, Like these guys do not make
each other better, don't.
Speaker 2: I don't I'm not doing it.
Speaker 3: I'm not doing it unless it's like only dead salary
and Ron's isn't in it. I would, I would do
it then, But why would we have to ever consider that.
Speaker 1: Lowry marketing our final name. That's the three first round
pick thing.
Speaker 2: I don't I just I don't know that it elevates
your ceiling enough. I'm probably not doing it, to be honest.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean he does fall a little below like
the Mitchell's and you know in a lot of the
shot creating guards that we had in the three pick option.
So I like Mark and I think the shooting is
a plus. I think you probably play them, you're honest,
and him as like a five and a four. So
maybe you get something else for Turner because I just
I don't think I want him at the three. Although
if Turner was shooting a great and then you had
three of your five front court, two of your three
front court guys that could really space, that's interesting with you, honest,
But I I'm not sure he's quite good enough to
justify this is what we're firing all the bullets at, right.
Speaker 2: The moral of the story then is what should the
Bucks do.
Speaker 1: I'm probably not making any big trade right now, even
if it was feasible to get with the one first
I mean the one first round pick for if it
was you'd have to throw the name out. But the
ones that see a red you could get for one
first round pick, I don't think are good enough to
fire that away without knowing Jannis's whims. And so if
you're keeping Giannis past the trade deadline, I will recalibrate
over the off season. That's my That is my official
stance of If the Bucks aren't gonna move him, they're progative,
I understand it. I'm not doing anything nuclear until the
off season.
Speaker 3: I think I agree. And I also just think like
we're throwing these options out there as like, well, what
if they could do this for one of their firsts now,
I don't even know that any of those will be available.
They might have to settle for something much worse than that.
So like if we're just operating, even if we're just
operating theoretically with some of the names we put out there,
I don't think I'm probably not doing it. I still
I mean option three is what you do, which is
you trade you honest, but like he's not going to
ask for it. The bucks seem clear, literally want to.
Speaker 2: Do that's why you also waiting in the off seasons.
Speaker 1: Maybe it reaches ahead and that then you didn't trade
any of your first round picks and you're not.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you'd much rather be in that position. And also
just like the real what if now if you do
the half measure, you do the one first trade for
whatever this year and then Giannis asks out anyway, like
you replenish the stores by trading you honest, but also
you kind of burned to pick on someone that maybe
you wouldn't have gone after all things being equal, you know, like,
so you don't want that to be the outcome either.
So maybe the best move is no move unless Yannis
asked for a trade, and then the one move is
very clear, you trade your honest. I just I think
if you're going to take a shot at it, it's
got to be meaningful. It's got to be an off season.
Speaker 2: Yet anything else? You ready to take us out of here?
Speaker 1: No?
Speaker 3: Thanks, are ready for listening, for watching? Remember subscribe across
all platforms, rate and review, Tell your friends, tell your enemies,
joining our discord links for that. In the YouTube and
podcast description, shouts Frank Milli Kean apologies, Jared Allen