Speaker 1: God loves and productions.
Speaker 2: I am a man who believed that I died twenty
Speaker 2: years ago, and I lived like a man who is
Speaker 2: dead already. I have no fear whatsoever of anybody or anything,
Speaker 2: Gary Webb.
Speaker 1: I am an investigative journalist can In nineteen ninety.
Speaker 3: Six I wrote a series of stories in termed Dark Awaians,
Speaker 3: which was about CIA involvement and drug run.
Speaker 4: A new A man who wasn't sid Duck smiles at
Speaker 4: us all.
Speaker 1: Old a man can do a smile back, go and
Speaker 1: bone the secret society. It's so sick that we can't
Speaker 1: talk about. What does that mean for America? The conspiracy
Speaker 1: theorist are going to go on.
Speaker 5: I don't know.
Speaker 1: I haven't seen the number three two two.
Speaker 3: Saff duty to reports this afternoon that my friend and
Speaker 3: colley Tim Russell collapsed and died earlier this afternoon.
Speaker 6: I may die in this felt.
Speaker 1: I don't in the area it tomorrow.
Speaker 6: I'm afraid what possible difference.
Speaker 2: Can I make?
Speaker 5: And no official of my administration, whether his rank is
Speaker 5: high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words
Speaker 5: here to night as an excuse to sense of the news,
Speaker 5: to stifle descent to cover Obama stakes, or to withhold
Speaker 5: from the press and the public the facts they deserve
Speaker 5: to know.
Speaker 4: What the fuck's up? Welcome to another already dead. It's Tuesday,
Speaker 4: nine thirty Eastern, same time, same place. I just a
Speaker 4: little bit of breaking some news to you guys. I know,
Speaker 4: we said we were supposed to have Dana Duda on,
Speaker 4: but she is dealing with the tragedy in the family
Speaker 4: just happened literally yesterday. So here we are, so our
Speaker 4: thoughts with her, So Bomber, we will get her on
Speaker 4: the future for sure. I'm in the midst of enjoying her.
Speaker 4: What is the process series that she just put out?
Speaker 4: I guess not too long ago she kind have put
Speaker 4: a pretty fire series also, go check that out. I
Speaker 4: recommend that. But to Bomber, we don't have her here
Speaker 4: with us today, but it is what it is. We
Speaker 4: get plenty to talk about. What's up, fellas, What a
Speaker 4: do jewels, ma'am?
Speaker 7: How's all's week going?
Speaker 4: Yeah? Pretty pretty great, pretty pretty pretty dope. I mean,
Speaker 4: we're not gonna rehash it again. We already we pissed
Speaker 4: off our audience by spending like thirty minutes fucking oh yeah,
Speaker 4: reeling over the I mean, to be fair, I was
Speaker 4: looking at the time like we should really actually like
Speaker 4: get to some like actual fucking contents of just like
Speaker 4: talking about like oh yeah, and you're awesome. Oh yeah,
Speaker 4: you're awesome. So happy for us, guys, We're excited twenty
Speaker 4: five minutes like straight up forty basically, but no, it
Speaker 4: was fun. Of those who don't watch the Morning Show.
Speaker 4: We're almost certainly going on on on with the Jake
Speaker 4: Shields podcast. At some point, I'm like, I've been scheduling
Speaker 4: with him, so oh dude, hell yeah, that's wild.
Speaker 7: Yeah, get him on already, dead bro.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean maybe well maybe we'll get in the future.
Speaker 3: We'll see, so that'll be up. Yeah. So I know
Speaker 3: this morning, right, we had a conversation and we covered
Speaker 3: that that signal leak the conversation as far as like
Speaker 3: jd Vance and heg Seth. I just I forgot to
Speaker 3: mention this one because I didn't really process it in
Speaker 3: real time, and so it took basically after the fact
Speaker 3: for me to kind of like think about the spin,
Speaker 3: you know, what I'm saying and what direction they were
Speaker 3: attempting to kind of you know, just as far as
Speaker 3: manipulating public perception, which is always kind of my my perspective,
Speaker 3: and so looking at it now, I realized that there
Speaker 3: were a few different things that were suggested in in
Speaker 3: this uh in this kind of revealing of the signal leak,
Speaker 3: and I found it interesting what JD. Vance was kind
Speaker 3: of you know, his at least his mentality as far
Speaker 3: as his philosophy behind kind of dragging his feet in
Speaker 3: regard to this attack and Yemen, and he one thing, Yeah,
Speaker 3: Europe must pay was one of the key aspects of it. Right,
Speaker 3: We're gonna we're going to hatch a plan essentially for.
Speaker 4: You Israel or a precious little angel alone exactly.
Speaker 3: Well, the and by the way heg seth if you remember,
Speaker 3: he specifically mentions, you know, like they don't the public
Speaker 3: doesn't know who the fuck the who these are, Like
Speaker 3: we need to focus on Biden failed, right, and the
Speaker 3: shipping lanes PR game.
Speaker 4: There was the initial concern in PR exactly.
Speaker 3: And then you have JD. Vance mentioning this is something
Speaker 3: I found interesting. He goes he it seems like a
Speaker 3: brief just like passing mention, but he's he mentions oil
Speaker 3: prices will potentially increase due to these shipping lane violations
Speaker 3: essentially right being targeted, and so he says, quote, if
Speaker 3: you think we should do it, let's go. I just
Speaker 3: hate bailing Europe out again, and that's again falling into
Speaker 3: the Europe will pay scenario. So this is a clean, convenient,
Speaker 3: copium justification for the any of the conservatives on the
Speaker 3: right who need some sort of yeah, some sort of
Speaker 3: way to cope and justify this this involvement in the
Speaker 3: first place, Well, clearly, you know, we have to protect
Speaker 3: these international shipping lanes, when in reality they're saying this
Speaker 3: is on behalf of Europe, when we all know this
Speaker 3: is for Israeli interest specifically, and and and uh, you know,
Speaker 3: for any other takeaway that's just you don't quite understand
Speaker 3: how this how.
Speaker 4: This, I will say, as you're saying that, it's making
Speaker 4: me think this is almost like a perfect pivot to
Speaker 4: back off of Yemen, you know, because you know, the
Speaker 4: posturing that has been made so far has been very
Speaker 4: brazen and very like they must do this or they're
Speaker 4: like very like, very like ultimatum, and it's like the yeah,
Speaker 4: the Houthis are just like legitimately just that fucking retarded,
Speaker 4: So they will just like keep fucking going, so like
Speaker 4: they've kind of like put their foot in their mouth,
Speaker 4: and it's like, I don't know if they're just like
Speaker 4: this isn't popular, this isn't going over well. Now this
Speaker 4: is kind of leak this out, now you you this
Speaker 4: is where you can back off of it. Honestly, Like
Speaker 4: the way it's kind of hedges things, really it kind
Speaker 4: of leaves you in the option to kind of like
Speaker 4: go moult this. This essentially gives you like a narrative break,
Speaker 4: a narrative like reset to like where you can kind
Speaker 4: of like you can continue on the same road you're on,
Speaker 4: or you can kind of change a different route because
Speaker 4: you can kind of play into it. You could play
Speaker 4: narratively speaking, like you could shift perception multiple different ways
Speaker 4: by going different Like hell, even this morning we were
Speaker 4: covering the story just like this one leak things like
Speaker 4: multiple different angles, and you have so many different cabinet
Speaker 4: members and then they're having different positions on this. So
Speaker 4: it's like you could pitch jd Vance as a hero,
Speaker 4: which I think he kind of already has. I mean,
Speaker 4: there's a fucking like like I mean, there was like
Speaker 4: the I love it for one, but you know, like
Speaker 4: the meme campaign of like JD. Vance. I think it's
Speaker 4: like the greatest thing of it. But it's a stomachs
Speaker 4: and I feel like it's I think it's a mixture
Speaker 4: of organic and artificial. Like that's when that's the best
Speaker 4: ops when they're like, oh, they're rioting off the tailwinds
Speaker 4: of some sort of organic factor. So it's like I
Speaker 4: think there is and so there is like a fun
Speaker 4: meme element. And you know JD. Vance is young, and
Speaker 4: we talked about this morning how he is kind of
Speaker 4: like at least, you know, has the perception, whether he
Speaker 4: actually reasons these things or not, as being on the
Speaker 4: cutting edge of like right wing philosophy. So he kind
Speaker 4: of can seems to be a thinker. You know, he's
Speaker 4: he's kind of fun and relatable. I mean, I think
Speaker 4: he's probably a closeted gay, but you know, like but
Speaker 4: for you know, from a you know, narrative, like just
Speaker 4: like he's kind of cool, he's kind of fun, you know,
Speaker 4: and he's like kind of a thinker. So it's like,
Speaker 4: I don't you can kind of I think there there
Speaker 4: is like they're trying to get us to like him.
Speaker 4: So like in I think it's working, and so he's
Speaker 4: the relatable character. So having him be like, come on, guys,
Speaker 4: and like you can almost give him a little bit
Speaker 4: of a break because you're like, he's the VP, he's
Speaker 4: the young guy. He's clearly like everyone else is against him.
Speaker 4: But even then he still has a little bit of
Speaker 4: courage to pip up like, guys.
Speaker 8: I don't know, I think we might be making a mistake.
Speaker 4: Here, and so he gets to be the lone the
Speaker 4: lone little voice. So like they can while it is
Speaker 4: super gay, especially if you're anyone of any sort of
Speaker 4: moral character, like you can sort of play fast and
Speaker 4: loose with it and go nuts with a narrative and
Speaker 4: kind of still pitch him. Is is a relatable, explainable
Speaker 4: like you know, whatever, you can see people have all
Speaker 4: been in a situation before where you're like the the
Speaker 4: low guy on the totem pole. He's a VP, so
Speaker 4: it doesn't really work. But even then he's still younger statesman.
Speaker 4: So even while with me the VP, it's kind of
Speaker 4: made up position, so we may actually still feel like
Speaker 4: a junior statesman there, you know. So it's like I
Speaker 4: don't know, I could I could see people being relatable
Speaker 4: to that situation and being like, well they you know,
Speaker 4: you're the one among many, like you might be like
Speaker 4: kick up, like well, I don't know if we should,
Speaker 4: but dude, you just started here. Shut the fuck up.
Speaker 4: Like if you're the new guy at work or whatever,
Speaker 4: you're like okay.
Speaker 3: Like honestly, though, the framework of it all struck me
Speaker 3: as manipulating public perception. That's what it seemed like the
Speaker 3: goal was, you know' you know, like leaks like that,
Speaker 3: don't just I don't know, man, it seems too convenient,
Speaker 3: far too convenient. They're legitimately like providing these again, these
Speaker 3: false narratives that, in my mind, while they kind of
Speaker 3: pay off the petroleum companies and you know, big business
Speaker 3: while claiming, oh god, look at gas prices and oil
Speaker 3: prices are spiking because of these darn houthis are attacking
Speaker 3: the shipping lanes, you know. Like, honestly, it seems like
Speaker 3: a layered agenda that always pays off in the end
Speaker 3: for the permanent establishment. You know what, A Boeing just
Speaker 3: got a fucking huge military contract again right for this
Speaker 3: new plane which we already know what with the F
Speaker 3: thirty five was just a joke, you know, wasn't that
Speaker 3: the one that was just like a complete failure, but
Speaker 3: not at all for the boondoggle.
Speaker 4: And I will say Doc Torre's and the chats getting it.
Speaker 4: We pointed this out this morning. I think the one
Speaker 4: silver lining here is I do think we might be
Speaker 4: getting some sort of NATO, you know, flirting with NATO
Speaker 4: like cause I mean when it comes to the power
Speaker 4: as it be, I think there are factions and you know,
Speaker 4: like it, and it's kind of obviously like we do
Speaker 4: sometimes like everything's all connected, like oh you want to
Speaker 4: be like, oh, one entity. I do think they're competing
Speaker 4: things and I think, yeah, there might be something too
Speaker 4: the at least the we're seeming to, don't know, position
Speaker 4: ourselves to be very anti Europe, anti NATO, and it's like,
Speaker 4: I don't know, maybe we will. Maybe that's a dying
Speaker 4: beast and they're getting ready to get rid of it.
Speaker 4: So I think it's a positive. Obviously they're gonna shift
Speaker 4: to something else, the powers that be, but still, you know,
Speaker 4: w's where you can find them?
Speaker 3: Oh absolutely, man, I just feel like United Nations are
Speaker 3: far more of kind of I understand what NATO's been
Speaker 3: utilized to as a pretext for basically essentially is what
Speaker 3: it really has become, you know, just for further involvement
Speaker 3: in proxy wars and things of that nature on the
Speaker 3: international stage. But yeah, the United Nations, I mean, again
Speaker 3: you can trace that back to the Rockfellers and the
Speaker 3: Rothschilds and and these exact connections that draw in the
Speaker 3: sadistic networks of child trafficking and abuse that again are
Speaker 3: are once just fully directly tied in with with this
Speaker 3: very permanent establishment that we discussed so often. That's why
Speaker 3: I think United Nations, I mean, it's it's really what
Speaker 3: was that created to do? Provoke the Soviet Union essentially
Speaker 3: like basically just kind of like step on their throats
Speaker 3: and then provoke them, you know, uh after the the
Speaker 3: foundation of that very organization. The whole point was.
Speaker 4: But yeah, yeah, no, that's.
Speaker 3: What I'm saying. NATO, Yeah, NATO is responsible for provoking Russia.
Speaker 3: And that's the point is they did their job. You said,
Speaker 3: you said you at one point when you yeah, I
Speaker 3: was just saying that the UN is far more I think,
Speaker 3: you know, what we should prioritize is like more of
Speaker 3: the umbrella organization that seems to have have been far
Speaker 3: more responsible for staging this this kind of globalist framework
Speaker 3: with the NGOs, all the various uh you know again
Speaker 3: just the direct connections. To me, what I instinctually interpret
Speaker 3: this as is NATO did their job.
Speaker 4: Look at this.
Speaker 3: Direct escalation and and provocation with Russia that seems to
Speaker 3: have achieved so much in regard to to our special
Speaker 3: interest groups at play with with these proxy wars in
Speaker 3: these various theaters of war. Geopolitically speaking as well, you
Speaker 3: think about you know, the the pipeline sabotage, right, like
Speaker 3: these things of that nature which completely play into propping
Speaker 3: up American petroleum companies and oil companies and and and
Speaker 3: kind of boxing out and isolating the Russian companies and
Speaker 3: and uh European company things of that nature where where
Speaker 3: you kind of like, you know, stack the deck in
Speaker 3: your favor.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 3: And and that's what the geopolitical chess matches is about.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 3: So I think that yeah, it I don't know as
Speaker 3: much as and I'm totally with you brother, I'm not
Speaker 3: trying to say we shouldn't like take a victory and
Speaker 3: in regard to hopefully getting out of NATO, I mean
Speaker 3: one less organization causing chaos. Of course, I'm I'm you know,
Speaker 3: optimistic about about that, but I'm always just.
Speaker 4: I mean, to be fair, it'll probably be the thing
Speaker 4: that's dangled at us as they're continuing their rampage in
Speaker 4: the Middle East. So that way, it's like kind of
Speaker 4: like a ooh, wow, look at this cool stuff we're doing.
Speaker 4: It's kind of the same ideas, like the Doge cuts
Speaker 4: while like while then they like give all that money
Speaker 4: to Israel. You know, it's like it's kind of like, ooh,
Speaker 4: we just saved three billion, then whatever Doge like, okay,
Speaker 4: six billion to Israel. You're like, whoa, whoaoa, what's going
Speaker 4: on here? It's kind of the same idea. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Sam referred to it as like Trump's mob boss mentality
Speaker 3: of like one for me, one for you. But it's
Speaker 3: also the duality of like, here's the reality of the
Speaker 3: situation and here's you know, the the spin for the
Speaker 3: public perception, and that's what it seems like is happening.
Speaker 3: You're getting this duality in the misconception of these false narratives,
Speaker 3: and I think that's by design. As always, it's how
Speaker 3: the mockingbird media operates. These spooks. Man mind manipulators, dealing
Speaker 3: in deception. It's what we talk about every fucking day.
Speaker 3: And I'm just like, at this point, you know, we
Speaker 3: keep getting these limited hangouts and dangling carrots, and what
Speaker 3: have we achieved?
Speaker 4: Truly?
Speaker 3: Where where are we headed?
Speaker 4: You guys?
Speaker 3: Who the fuck is Peter Teel? Like, can we please
Speaker 3: have a real conversation about like what is happening here
Speaker 3: and what the technocracy is? I mean, that's that's the issue.
Speaker 3: And and everybody likes to kind of just like, you know,
Speaker 3: it's it's the elephant in the room at all times.
Speaker 4: And a flat circle, Doggie, you got fucking Peter Teal,
Speaker 4: these weird fucking you know, and his acolytes and all
Speaker 4: these different secret societies and all the different weird, fucking
Speaker 4: kooky sex parties and all that shit. And then we
Speaker 4: can crank back the fucking time, go back in time
Speaker 4: times of Flat Circle, and we see this, We see
Speaker 4: Benjamin Franklin, you know, the the the the you know,
Speaker 4: inventor extraordinarire, you know, fucking bodies found in his house.
Speaker 4: Like you know, like we can look back and it's like,
Speaker 4: you know, history rhymes and it's like they're doing this
Speaker 4: is just ship is the tale as old as time.
Speaker 4: This is you know, as we kind of were talking
Speaker 4: about this morning. When it comes to like say like
Speaker 4: a kind of connecting into the possible theme of bro Grove,
Speaker 4: when it comes to like us on like mk ultra,
Speaker 4: it's like sometimes this stuff, it's like demonology. Are they
Speaker 4: just describing this what what you could be could easily
Speaker 4: describe as mk ultra today is is that just oh,
Speaker 4: they used to invoke demons and there was some sort
Speaker 4: of evil process they had to do trauma, awful trauma
Speaker 4: to a human being to evoke certain consciousnesses that would
Speaker 4: get them power. What more power could there be in
Speaker 4: the world and controlling a human being? I mean obviously
Speaker 4: there's supernatural stuff. That's probably the closest thing you could
Speaker 4: get and things between ancient people. You're immediately going to
Speaker 4: attribute that to God, and you know what, maybe that
Speaker 4: is religious, but that's that's easily yo. This motherfucker's evil.
Speaker 4: I've created this evil entity that has a split personality.
Speaker 4: I put a demon in them. I invoked a demon
Speaker 4: like you know, like how like is that? You know?
Speaker 4: And so it's kind of the idea of this stuff
Speaker 4: is ancient. This stuff is tails all his time. The
Speaker 4: societies that are you know that are you know, have
Speaker 4: procure things and use the the the procuring the vices
Speaker 4: of these elites against them, and the cycle just kind
Speaker 4: of and it just keeps on going and going going.
Speaker 4: It's it's the thing they all are kind of aware
Speaker 4: of and enter into this thing. It's like a dark BacT.
Speaker 7: So I didn't want to address something real fast, guys,
Speaker 7: Alan asked, And this is the third time I've seen this.
Speaker 7: I haven't been able to address it yet. Does this
Speaker 7: guy have a no Gertz tat no Alan?
Speaker 4: Much worn? Yeah, born to lose, Live to win.
Speaker 3: Okay, so beautiful, brother.
Speaker 4: I got no regards here. I got one of the
Speaker 4: chest ones too, but I'm not regards Yeah, hell yeah,
Speaker 4: no way, we all have those stereotypical no way. Yeah,
Speaker 4: we all have the exact same placement.
Speaker 3: We found each other original.
Speaker 4: What's your quote? Austin, You guys don't deserve to know
Speaker 4: at this point. Honestly, everybody here for this conversation quote,
Speaker 4: I'm going to feel gay if I tell you too.
Speaker 4: It's it's it feels like when people are like, what's
Speaker 4: your tattoo? What's this say? What's that I feel like
Speaker 4: when someone I feel it's the same feeling as when
Speaker 4: someone's telling me about their dreams, Like I don't want
Speaker 4: to tell you about my tattoos.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, yep, no doubt.
Speaker 4: Mm hmm yeah. For a quick Peterson, Oh, I did Peterson?
Speaker 4: Can you Jordan Peterson?
Speaker 3: Jules?
Speaker 4: I did one this morning?
Speaker 3: He did Bubbles from Trailer Park Boys.
Speaker 4: It was I think I had it was wavering between
Speaker 4: Bubbles and Peterson at times. I don't know it well, K.
Speaker 8: I just think men need to be men, and you know,
Speaker 8: just make their freaking you know. And I'm not terrible.
Speaker 8: At least you're trying. At least I did try. I
Speaker 8: did try, Tim, Don't that fucker?
Speaker 4: Oh sweet? Now that's the edit for the week. Great.
Speaker 3: Before we get into uh, you know, ancient neo pagan
Speaker 3: sex magic, we should uh probably we should probably discuss
Speaker 3: uh at least briefly mentioned you know, Ben Shapiro's uh
Speaker 3: real hot take, you know, addressing the JFK files and
Speaker 3: and and I saw Sam he actually quote sweeted the
Speaker 3: other day the bench Shapiro's take on the JFK files.
Speaker 3: And he goes because it was basically he doesn't care
Speaker 3: who killed JFK because it was a long time ago.
Speaker 3: And then Sam goes holocash molocaust. Am I right, people,
Speaker 3: I almost fucking died. I thought it was the perfect response.
Speaker 4: He's CORRECTA by the way, op, Jeff, fuck you, And
Speaker 4: I'm just kidding. He said, did you guys get any
Speaker 4: content this morning? Antel leave at the first forty minutes?
Speaker 4: All right, I will little little life hack for those
Speaker 4: who like the morning streams. We do leave time Sam's
Speaker 4: actress if you come back to it later. If there
Speaker 4: is like if we do have some morning where we
Speaker 4: were little being chatty little girls and we spent way
Speaker 4: too long getting to actual content, you can skip right ahead,
Speaker 4: like you just just click right. Literally it's a hyperlinked
Speaker 4: on YouTube. You can put I think on Rumble too.
Speaker 4: You click on it and goes right to the first
Speaker 4: You can avoid all that fucking all that frigging normal vamping,
Speaker 4: normal intro stuff. You know, cut right, get out of
Speaker 4: the fluff, go straight to the content. You can. You
Speaker 4: can do that, so I understand the frustration. But like,
Speaker 4: also keep in mind, the morning stream is a stream.
Speaker 4: It's not like, yes, we put them on RSS feeds,
Speaker 4: but it's more of a hangout. So it's like if
Speaker 4: you're expecting like a well produced like podcast, I mean, yes,
Speaker 4: we put it out as a podcast, but that's not
Speaker 4: like no that would be more like my like one
Speaker 4: to two episodes I do a week of No Way Jose,
Speaker 4: or like Austin's produced episodes. He's about to make another
Speaker 4: one here soon. That'd be more like that.
Speaker 3: So I saw people react negatively occasion this show.
Speaker 7: On Spotify and someone was like, wow, I tried to
Speaker 7: watch really interesting topics, but I had to turn it
Speaker 7: off too much cussing. And then someone goes, I know, right,
Speaker 7: it's like their thirteen year old boys that just discovered
Speaker 7: how to cuss, and so I was just like, well, sorry,
Speaker 7: thanks for watching or something.
Speaker 4: I mean, it is fair. I get it. Whatever that's
Speaker 4: on the show for you. I mean, I don't know,
Speaker 4: maybe it's some point we should try to clear it up,
Speaker 4: but I'm having fun, so whatever. I mean. I know
Speaker 4: it does restrict your audience, because I get it. I've
Speaker 4: had young kids in the car try to listen to
Speaker 4: podcasts and stuff and then someone's like, uh nigger, You're like,
Speaker 4: ah shit, come on, man.
Speaker 1: I be honest.
Speaker 3: There was one episode a couple back that I felt like,
Speaker 3: all right, I cursed a little bit too much, but
Speaker 3: I was I was having too much fun. Man, I
Speaker 3: was enjoying me. But but and I don't know, man
Speaker 3: like it's kind of funny because I think really the
Speaker 3: only time there's any sort of negative reaction to it
Speaker 3: is basically if they prefer my solo work at least
Speaker 3: when I see it, which this is the antithesis of that.
Speaker 3: I mean, this is obviously it's it's not as well,
Speaker 3: you know, well crafted as far as my idea is.
Speaker 3: I don't get the time to kind of assess exactly
Speaker 3: how I want to you know, present the ideas as well,
Speaker 3: and and the you know, also consider the just the
Speaker 3: conceptual outline, because I'm always like that's what I I
Speaker 3: find I'm most proud of. I think when it comes
Speaker 3: down to my solo projects are are basically kind of
Speaker 3: like how I staged the narrative because I feel like
Speaker 3: it it's a little more unique. And when it comes
Speaker 3: down to like the I don't know, that's my attempt
Speaker 3: at least, and so I hopefully it's appreciated. But I
Speaker 3: do think that that that might be, you know, the
Speaker 3: only reason.
Speaker 4: It's just different. Just if you're looking for a podcast,
Speaker 4: just don't watch these. These are hangouts, yeah, I mean,
Speaker 4: but you can also skip to the content, like that's
Speaker 4: what the time says. So if you do want like
Speaker 4: just straight content, obviously it's not gonna be ideal, but
Speaker 4: you can script skip straight to the time stamps and
Speaker 4: you'll kind of get some like obviously it's not gonna
Speaker 4: be as quite like as nice as like a you know, uh,
Speaker 4: they are more produced content. But yeah, what are you
Speaker 4: itching to say something? There? Pal? I see you. You're
Speaker 4: you're all giggling. What's up? Jules? You said a look
Speaker 4: on your face to say, I don't know, you're being weird? Okay,
Speaker 4: fucking face all right, awestin about these weird fucking devians.
Speaker 3: Well, hold on, we got to finish. We got to
Speaker 3: finish this brief moment of time. We focus on Ben
Speaker 3: Shapiro's hot take because oh yeah, yeah, because I swear
Speaker 3: it is. It is so terrible and uh and it's
Speaker 3: at least worth acknowledging once again. So if if did
Speaker 3: you cover this on the morning stream at all? Have
Speaker 3: you covered it since his ridiculous like forty seconds bullshit
Speaker 3: tangent on how it doesn't matter, and then this new
Speaker 3: article of course that dropped today.
Speaker 4: I'm not even I might have mentioned his reaction initial
Speaker 4: one that a lot of people did, but honestly, I
Speaker 4: just I don't know. I guess to me, like not
Speaker 4: to be a Debbie downer, but most Shapiro stuff is
Speaker 4: kind of like low hanging fruit these days. I'm like, yeah, sure,
Speaker 4: it's still hilarious, and I think it's worth mentioning because again,
Speaker 4: like so many people within the public, they they hook
Speaker 4: line and sync or you know, they embraced these narratives, right,
Speaker 4: and they very much I mean, Ben Shapiro, as much
Speaker 4: as he's taken a lot of really I think he's
Speaker 4: he's very much kind of lost a lot of.
Speaker 3: His credibility in the in the past couple of years.
Speaker 3: I mean, just as far as like the public's interpretation
Speaker 3: of Ben Shapiro's work. But still I know people who
Speaker 3: are far less plugged in, and this might be a
Speaker 3: factor as far as like we are overexposed, you know,
Speaker 3: and and so maybe that's not quite the perception of
Speaker 3: the public at this very moment in regard to Ben Shapiro,
Speaker 3: and they still very much value his opinion, and so
Speaker 3: that alone is important to understand how people will attempt
Speaker 3: to justify these ridiculous narratives and also dismiss something as
Speaker 3: you know, as far as like just the new revelations
Speaker 3: that have been exposed in regard to filling in certain
Speaker 3: reactions in the JFK files that has been valuable as
Speaker 3: much as who is there to hold accountable is really like,
Speaker 3: you know, the question that ultimately, you know, in essence,
Speaker 3: it doesn't really matter at the end of the day
Speaker 3: because we're not actually going to see any real consequences, right,
Speaker 3: but still, I think it's interesting, So so real quick before.
Speaker 4: We address this, I do some of these chat says,
Speaker 4: why does jose so freely use the N word? Has
Speaker 4: he been given some sort of pass that we should
Speaker 4: be aware of? Yeah, No, I'm my own man, and
Speaker 4: I do what the fuck I want. And I realize
Speaker 4: words are words, and if it really depends on how
Speaker 4: I mean them, And I literally was just meaning it
Speaker 4: in that context to make a point of a naughty word,
Speaker 4: and that was the peak. Naughty word literally was in
Speaker 4: no way even meant towards a human being in that context.
Speaker 4: So how they could in any way ever be found
Speaker 4: offensive is insane. The only it should be offensive is
Speaker 4: in the sense of like, oh, you shouldn't be using
Speaker 4: such naughty language, not in the oh my god, how
Speaker 4: dare you say that specific word? So yeah, if you're
Speaker 4: just upset about the foul language, fair, But if you're
Speaker 4: upset about oh my god, how dare you use this
Speaker 4: specific word? Fuck? You grow up? You're being a child.
Speaker 4: But obviously I'm just I'm just joking. I get you're
Speaker 4: being silly. I know you're not like you don't care.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, but but it's one hundred percent like just
Speaker 3: as far as you know, the intent behind what you
Speaker 3: say is ultimately what always matters and and should be,
Speaker 3: you know, the priority as far as what you focus on.
Speaker 3: So I think it's just laughable and ridiculous.
Speaker 4: The knee jerk reaction emotionally, Yeah, it's like one of
Speaker 4: my favorite jokes I think ever on Tower Gang was
Speaker 4: Cole He said, uh god, what do you I forget
Speaker 4: exactly you put it, because I'm a butcher. But the
Speaker 4: idea is, like people get more of said about you
Speaker 4: saying nigger than killing niggers, like that joke, just saying that.
Speaker 4: It's like offensive, like people need your get offended, and
Speaker 4: you're like, the very fact you get offended is the point.
Speaker 4: Like if I were to tell you about like however
Speaker 4: many blacks dying in Somalia, you don't give a shit,
Speaker 4: you know, like, but you hear a naughty word and
Speaker 4: you fucking throw a You're like, this is the exact
Speaker 4: like in impulse that like you should destroy inside of yourself,
Speaker 4: like you just maybe learn to like actually focus on
Speaker 4: things matter as opposed to virtually virtue signaling. The idea
Speaker 4: of yeah, oh no, I heard word that set off
Speaker 4: my you know, brain response. Now now I must provide
Speaker 4: ex response or whatever, like like like grow up.
Speaker 3: Like that was the one that was the one aspect
Speaker 3: of that concept of suicidal empathy as far as civilizational uh,
Speaker 3: suicidal empathy, that made sense to me and at any
Speaker 3: level because obviously there's truth. There's absolute truth to that,
Speaker 3: you know what Cole said, like as far as man
Speaker 3: the level of reaction emotionally you will get from from
Speaker 3: that word rather than an actual like legitimate story about
Speaker 3: like you you were saying some sort of mass death situation.
Speaker 4: It's stuff that we try to get people to care about,
Speaker 4: like stuff and like gods that they were like we're
Speaker 4: horrified about. But then then I say, and obviously, once
Speaker 4: again I'm not saying any of the chat are actually offended.
Speaker 4: But then I just you know, casually say nigger and
Speaker 4: not even meaning it to offend, to refer to anyone
Speaker 4: or anything. And there's a theory there are people out
Speaker 4: in the world who will legitimately get offended by that.
Speaker 4: But I will tell you about the awful, awful crimes
Speaker 4: of Israel to like the poor some of the poorest
Speaker 4: people in the world in Palestine, and no one will
Speaker 4: bat an eye, no one will care. You can't even
Speaker 4: get them. They will immediately go into knee jerk Rolodeck's
Speaker 4: responses of apologetics for it.
Speaker 7: And it's like as opposed to dry by shootings in
Speaker 7: Chicago and and no, h that either you know.
Speaker 3: So I mean or something, it's another way to manipulate.
Speaker 3: It's it's just, you know, so again, it's like that
Speaker 3: is the issue with you know, as far as like
Speaker 3: what I think is is cultural Marxism. That's really what
Speaker 3: has been the result is this over empathetic nature that
Speaker 3: is not grounded in reality in any sort of way.
Speaker 3: And you know, so it's it's frustrating to win, to
Speaker 3: witness the level of concern that that a lot of
Speaker 3: these people who are Yeah, they they've embraced this new
Speaker 3: wage philosophy. Yeah, they seem to be done just very much.
Speaker 4: Go back, just casually use the inward again.
Speaker 3: Man, Yeah, I agree, call me whatever you want.
Speaker 4: It's like, I don't even casually use the edward. You
Speaker 4: ever hung around old people that do casually use the unword, dude, Yeah,
Speaker 4: absolutely for sure. But but yeah, again, it's like, you know,
Speaker 4: good people are good and they know intent is what
Speaker 4: truly matters, and like that.
Speaker 3: You know, so it's just a ridiculous concept to begin with.
Speaker 3: But let's listen to this retard.
Speaker 4: Yeah, we'll see what this US is say.
Speaker 9: Sort of conspiracy theorizing that's become incredibly popular on the
Speaker 9: right these days. It was popular on the left, and
Speaker 9: now it's become increasingly popular on the right, the kind
Speaker 9: of let's just ask questions less who really killed JFK?
Speaker 9: Wink wink, nod, nod. And then you're like, well, do
Speaker 9: you have any evidence of the thing that you are
Speaker 9: pre supposed.
Speaker 1: Well, no, I'm not.
Speaker 9: I'm not making any accusations. I just know, I don't
Speaker 9: believe the story that I'm being told. I know not
Speaker 9: to trust the authorities. Like, well, that's fine, but do
Speaker 9: you have like any evidence, like evidence, not just supposition
Speaker 9: as well?
Speaker 4: You're part of it, aren't you?
Speaker 1: You?
Speaker 4: Yes, you you're part of it.
Speaker 9: The reason that you're that you're so defensive about all
Speaker 9: this is I don't care it killed JFK. I mean
Speaker 9: I do because it's really interesting. But I noticed that
Speaker 9: the calendar says twenty twenty five, and he was killed
Speaker 9: in nineteen sixty three. And so my opinion about who
Speaker 9: kill JFK has about as much relevance as who killed
Speaker 9: William McKinley, which is James Garfield, which is to say,
Speaker 9: not an enormous amount.
Speaker 4: All right, speaking of Ley, let's talk about the health
Speaker 4: arclams kidding, but how how perfect is that response Holocaust?
Speaker 3: Molocaust? It's just the funniest fucking thing, Like how could
Speaker 3: he then.
Speaker 4: Wrote a piece on that, right? That was his fun
Speaker 4: He then followed up to explain did he was there
Speaker 4: some sort of like a m Night shamel On twists
Speaker 4: in there to where like it really wasn't the case,
Speaker 4: and it was like, here's why I was wrong or
Speaker 4: or kind of like re you know, or re sort
Speaker 4: of framing how his actual response or or what was
Speaker 4: it kind of like a retcon.
Speaker 3: Of sorts, you know, yeah, yeah, exactly, it was this
Speaker 3: is what.
Speaker 4: That way, And Clint I was going to basically addressed
Speaker 4: this in a tweet earlier.
Speaker 3: Clint Russell I thought he perfectly addressed this in a
Speaker 3: tweet earlier, actually, because what the area he focused on.
Speaker 3: And again, this is such a small article. Like you
Speaker 3: consider Ben Shapiro, He's he's considered to be this like
Speaker 3: prominent intellectual, you know, on this at least in this
Speaker 3: environment of at least in the media environment we find
Speaker 3: ourselves in. So it's interesting though, because you read the
Speaker 3: article and it's so small, you know, it seems as
Speaker 3: if you would write more if you were if you
Speaker 3: were kind of assigned a subject in a high school
Speaker 3: English class. But still it is interesting what he has
Speaker 3: to say because a couple of moments he essentially justifies
Speaker 3: this non shift in the conclusion that Oswald acted alone.
Speaker 3: And all he does is he explains that speculation about
Speaker 3: the real explanation for JFK's assassination has been an enormous
Speaker 3: cottage industry for decades. As of November twenty twenty three,
Speaker 3: a Gallop poll showed that sixty five percent of Americans
Speaker 3: believe that people other than Lee Harvey Oswald were involved
Speaker 3: in the murder. At no point since the assassination have
Speaker 3: a majority of Americans believed the truth that Oswald was
Speaker 3: a lone gunman. So he's straight up is already saying
Speaker 3: that Oswald acted alone and that is the truth. So
Speaker 3: that is within the context of this and it.
Speaker 4: Starts from that assertion, like that was what that first
Speaker 4: paragraph was.
Speaker 3: Exactly, and then this is legitimately the extent of the
Speaker 3: article goes to the the.
Speaker 4: Hey, the very end.
Speaker 7: I was gonna ask you, if you could scroll back
Speaker 7: up real fast, just real fast.
Speaker 3: Awesome, which one were you looking for.
Speaker 7: To the percentage of this other paragraph? Right, I was
Speaker 7: saying seventy seven percent of something.
Speaker 3: I don't know, Sorry, it might have been the next, oh,
Speaker 3: eighty one percent, let's see, oh yeah, seventy seven percent here. So, so,
Speaker 3: why are so many Americans convinced by all available evidence
Speaker 3: that others were involved in the JFK assassination. Much of
Speaker 3: it has to do with the rapidly declining levels of
Speaker 3: trust in the American government since the nineteen sixties.
Speaker 4: Trust more, Yeah, what was the what was.
Speaker 3: The number one priority at DOVOS this past cycle?
Speaker 4: Probably the trust. Another thing was trust.
Speaker 3: Was regaining public trust. YEP, it's the fucking goal. So
Speaker 3: you wonder why, oh, Elon just canceled a fifty two
Speaker 3: billion dollar payment or whatever, however much it was a
Speaker 3: million dollars something I can't remember now to the World
Speaker 3: Economic Form smoking Mer's brother. That's manipulation. That's what people.
Speaker 4: Need to be doing, is paying attention to the influencers
Speaker 4: right now. I know there especially, we're at a turning
Speaker 4: point right now, we're at an a media turning point
Speaker 4: where we're a huge point where the establishment's dying, right
Speaker 4: wings kind of rising up because obviously, you know, right
Speaker 4: wing coming in and you know, the right wing has
Speaker 4: been the anti establishment for probably about I mean probably
Speaker 4: honestly it passed like twelve years because even while Trump
Speaker 4: was in, there still was this spirit of anti establishment
Speaker 4: to Tyrrianism, to a because like all this like oh
Speaker 4: it's him versus Deep State, the FBI, Russia, Russia, Russia, like,
Speaker 4: so he really did have scandals like of that sort.
Speaker 4: So it did, you know, whether you want to believe
Speaker 4: that's true or not. Even if it didn't, like whatever,
Speaker 4: it was good theater. That was a thing happening. So
Speaker 4: there's like the the Republicans were, like, you know, have
Speaker 4: been anti establishment for a while, so they've been brewing
Speaker 4: in those those storms to where they like, you know, now,
Speaker 4: these influencer types, the people coming in that are gonna
Speaker 4: be the new media, are going to be the type
Speaker 4: that weren't tapped indirectly into the establishment. They're kind of
Speaker 4: like somewhat into the establishment. They're in like the new
Speaker 4: establishment types like the Blazes, the Daily Wires, the Babylon Bees.
Speaker 4: So they're gonna be maybe a little bit tapped into
Speaker 4: maybe like a very or like maybe on a the
Speaker 4: tertiary level or just like slightly or maybe not directly.
Speaker 4: But they're gonna be coming from the right. And we're
Speaker 4: in this time now where well it seems to be
Speaker 4: whether you want to accept it or not, the Trump
Speaker 4: is becoming this this this is the establishment. I don't
Speaker 4: think there's any way to fight it. Like you look
Speaker 4: at it, you know, pay attention to. The influencers are
Speaker 4: the ones that are pivoting and kind of like becoming
Speaker 4: kind of accepting reality if you're not accepting reality, if
Speaker 4: they're still focusing on Oh my god, look at these
Speaker 4: dose cuts. Oh my god, look at oh dude, we're
Speaker 4: like as we as if they dingle dangle Nato in
Speaker 4: front of our face, as they're like killing thousands upon
Speaker 4: thousands of fucking you know kids in Palestine. Like it's like, yo, dude,
Speaker 4: Like I don't know, have like an idea of scope
Speaker 4: and like, don't be such an idiot that you can
Speaker 4: just be dangled. But I have a feeling there's gonna
Speaker 4: be a lot of influencers that like rebuilding that trust
Speaker 4: they're gonna be focusing on. I think there's gonna be
Speaker 4: a lot of like look over here, look at this
Speaker 4: cool thing. Look at the JFK files.
Speaker 7: Look at the meme of the dude's pointing of Mojack's
Speaker 7: pointing or whatever.
Speaker 4: Yeah, JFK files. Don't look at the files over here,
Speaker 4: you know, like, don't worry about that.
Speaker 3: That blood the media landscape, and I think at least
Speaker 3: in many ways, you have everyone wherever they fall on
Speaker 3: that ideological spectrum, they kind of get the narrative necessary
Speaker 3: to move forward in the permanent establishments, you know, official
Speaker 3: version of how you should kind of interpret this reality
Speaker 3: that you're embracing, you know, and and facilitating nonetheless, which
Speaker 3: is what everyone tends to kind of subconsciously do, whether
Speaker 3: they know it or not, it's happening. And so the
Speaker 3: more you embrace these things, even our use of GROC
Speaker 3: to make the fucking edits, I mean, like you know
Speaker 3: the thumbnails, I mean, like what is GROC. I mean,
Speaker 3: Grock's probably one hundred percent created you know AI right,
Speaker 3: basically a white cast net that's attempting to essentially, you know,
Speaker 3: utilize each and everything that we enter into its right
Speaker 3: into its database. And that alone is like connected directly
Speaker 3: to intelligence and the intelligence apparatus. So like, what is
Speaker 3: the you know, moral framework as far as the ethical
Speaker 3: standard in regard to what GROC is being used for?
Speaker 4: Is it just the like?
Speaker 3: And I'm thinking, like we're providing this this thing with
Speaker 3: our ideas in a certain way.
Speaker 4: You know, who's just getting out of our thumbnails? We
Speaker 4: use it for every day, it's gonna be so good
Speaker 4: at drawing us shitting.
Speaker 3: Yeah right, No, But I'm saying, like when I put
Speaker 3: it in for like who knows, Like just as far
Speaker 3: as like the thematic you know, aspect of the episode
Speaker 3: itself and the topics. We discussed that alone could be
Speaker 3: utilized to put us into a specific category, Like we
Speaker 3: use it.
Speaker 4: For hashtags every day. I type in, I do it
Speaker 4: for the thumbnail, and then I go provide twe I
Speaker 4: literally go, hey, provide twenty total hashtags for the following
Speaker 4: topics colon. Usually I'll just kind of like copy and
Speaker 4: paste the title. Maybe I'll change a little bit so
Speaker 4: it's like more understandable for the AI and then boom
Speaker 4: enter and then I'll maybe do a little bit changing
Speaker 4: like oh, give it to me this way, get me
Speaker 4: that way for format boom boom bang. But it's like
Speaker 4: even just that right there, it's like, dude, I'm giving
Speaker 4: him literally thematic elements of how I think and the
Speaker 4: things I'm covering and like and like, you know, keep it.
Speaker 4: So yeah, it is like but it is kind of
Speaker 4: like one of those things that are like what are.
Speaker 3: You feeding the beast? That's whatever you're doing in a way, man, Like, Hey,
Speaker 3: I'm just saying like if if we're attempting to kind
Speaker 3: of like live by our principles and at least at
Speaker 3: least acknowledge our principles every step.
Speaker 1: Of the way.
Speaker 3: We should we should be able to call ourselves out
Speaker 3: when whenever we're kind of playing into the new, newly
Speaker 3: crafted technocracy as far as their various elements that that are,
Speaker 3: I think, you know, far more useful to this very
Speaker 3: permanent establishment than we are acknowledging. So that's my only
Speaker 3: perspective line.
Speaker 4: I guess I would push back, And then I don't
Speaker 4: know if I was telling a praiseple thing, because I
Speaker 4: don't think you should look at as a zero one.
Speaker 4: This is a tool. It's a tool that we are aware.
Speaker 4: I think maybe in a backhanded way you use against
Speaker 4: us later, but it is kind of a tool. I mean,
Speaker 4: that'd be like saying, I don't know calculators might be
Speaker 4: used against later, like you cannot use calculators make man
Speaker 4: harder for yourself.
Speaker 3: Wow, the direct connection, I mean, think of the Twitter files,
Speaker 3: think of Elon Musk. We already know he's created by
Speaker 3: the intelligence apparatus. I mean, that's essentially where he comes from.
Speaker 4: His grandfather.
Speaker 3: I already talked about John Holdeman, and we already know
Speaker 3: in technocracy incorporated Social Credit Party in Canada. I mean
Speaker 3: get the universal basic income. This is legitimately what the
Speaker 3: exact same philosophy that Elon has embraced and moved forward
Speaker 3: for his entire life is dedicated to implementing this vision
Speaker 3: of his grandfather. You know, like I don't know, man,
Speaker 3: it seems like maybe granddaddy was a part of some
Speaker 3: elite fraternal organization of powerful influence and Elon Musk is
Speaker 3: just a member of the club and we ain't in it,
Speaker 3: and nobody's acknowledging that fact for the most part. And
Speaker 3: so yeah, I'm only pushing back on the reality that
Speaker 3: AI is kind of it's the next phase, right, So
Speaker 3: so again you're seeing the uh what's his name, damn it,
Speaker 3: I've mentioned him multiple times that that uh Andresen right,
Speaker 3: and yeah, doctor Reigman, Yeah, yeah, who was promoting AI
Speaker 3: government on on Rogan and Rogan like he convinced him.
Speaker 3: You know, Rogan was open to this concept. He thought
Speaker 3: it was a brilliant idea. Oh, we won't have these
Speaker 3: you know, ethical issues, what you know, a big no,
Speaker 3: we won't have anyone to hold accountable.
Speaker 4: And you know, you know, a core part of a
Speaker 4: lot of that, like Silicon Valley, like rationalists thinking. A
Speaker 4: lot of it does come into like the like a
Speaker 4: lot of it is very like next level like goes
Speaker 4: into AI thinking in the future and like how and
Speaker 4: they they almost a lot of it comes in these
Speaker 4: like mind games of like oh well, like thinking there's
Speaker 4: gonna be an AI god and there's something to that,
Speaker 4: the idea that like I guess I think I sort
Speaker 4: of there was someone who was pointing out out like
Speaker 4: you know, writings, but Geno in Greece and or some
Speaker 4: of these other people that kind of point to where
Speaker 4: there's kind of it's almost as if they're like, that's
Speaker 4: what they're going for. It's like, oh yeah, we're trying
Speaker 4: to create the AIE god. It's like like they're all
Speaker 4: like that's part of like the ideology of that rationalists
Speaker 4: that's weirdly infecting this like Silicon Valley landscape. But it
Speaker 4: is like it's just bizarre. It's almost like this new
Speaker 4: age religion that's seeping in. They're like, oh, let's make
Speaker 4: the let's make the anti Christ. You're like, dude, what
Speaker 4: the fuck, Like I mean, not saying that's gonna be
Speaker 4: what it is, I don't know, but it is like
Speaker 4: if that's your belief system that your guys are kind
Speaker 4: of seemingly getting wrapped up, and yet you guys are
Speaker 4: rushing towards it. You're like, yo, what the fuck? Like,
Speaker 4: especially when you think and then you can think about
Speaker 4: it's a got like the transide, which is kind of
Speaker 4: like suicidal, you know, like, oh yeah, yeah, you're like,
Speaker 4: what the fuck?
Speaker 3: For sure? But Peter Thiel, you know, citing ancient biblical prophecy,
Speaker 3: you know what I mean? Like, like, as as far
Speaker 3: as he's playing into so much of this in in
Speaker 3: regard to kind of urging a long public conception of
Speaker 3: these these specific agenda items and benchmark goals, and I
Speaker 3: think that that's also by design. So anyway, the very
Speaker 3: last thing that's worth mentioning here before we just move
Speaker 3: on into something more worthwhile is basically, well, hold on,
Speaker 3: what did you want me.
Speaker 4: To cover here? Jules?
Speaker 3: There was a part here that it basically I was.
Speaker 7: Just looking at a certain.
Speaker 3: It's cool, we can cover it real quick. It's so
Speaker 3: so short. Anyway, every time I seen.
Speaker 4: Numerologies Crowley, yeah, not wrong, brother, Yeah, man, you see
Speaker 4: it a lot.
Speaker 3: It reappears and resurfaces so very often that it's impossible
Speaker 3: to dismiss it really is. And that's what another thing
Speaker 3: that I value so much about pattern recognition, like why
Speaker 3: does it consistently come up so very often? So that
Speaker 3: that is yes, brother, and it's a cul to nature.
Speaker 3: You go back to these Neil pagan ancient you know, philosophies,
Speaker 3: and there you go. But anyway, so, so did you
Speaker 3: not want me to cover this final point here?
Speaker 4: Bro? What I can't hear you? Jose, Oh, I'm sorry,
Speaker 4: didn't realize I was. I was just trying to bring
Speaker 4: it up. I don't even mean to kick your thing off.
Speaker 4: I was just getting ready for after you finish your thing,
Speaker 4: my bad I have in the way. I was just
Speaker 4: going to bring it up in transition over to the calling.
Speaker 3: After all, it was the shots anyway, So it's no
Speaker 3: big deal. It's just screenshots from the Ben Shapiro article
Speaker 3: because it paywalled of course right away. And and uh
Speaker 3: the part that you noticed their jewels about the seventy
Speaker 3: seven again they stayed. He stages this question. So why
Speaker 3: are so many Americans convinced despite all available evidence that
Speaker 3: others were involved in the jfk assassination? Could you imagine
Speaker 3: asking that question much much of it has to do
Speaker 3: with the rapidly declining levels of trust in the American
Speaker 3: government since the nineteen sixties. While only fifty two percent
Speaker 3: of Americans believed in a JFK conspiracy theory in nineteen
Speaker 3: sixty three, that's incredible for as far as like considering
Speaker 3: the very moment in time, the instinctual reaction was the
Speaker 3: majority believed it was a conspiracy. I mean, that's actually
Speaker 3: pretty incredible. We've come along with yeah, so winning baby,
Speaker 3: an idea fostered by Legacy media, which claimed that he
Speaker 3: had been killed by right wing hate. By nineteen seventy six,
Speaker 3: that number had skyrocketed to eighty one percent. That trend
Speaker 3: correlates with a radical increase in distrust in government generally.
Speaker 3: In sixty four, some seventy seven percent of Americans said
Speaker 3: that they trusted the government to do the right thing
Speaker 3: always or most of the time. By nineteen seventy six,
Speaker 3: that number had dropped to thirty five percent. As of
Speaker 3: twenty twenty four, by the way, that number is twenty
Speaker 3: two percent now. Distrust of government is a perfectly normal
Speaker 3: and even admirable feature of American political life, dating back
Speaker 3: to the founding The founders distrusted government not to abuse
Speaker 3: the rights of individuals, and thus sought checks and balances
Speaker 3: to prevent it from occurring. But since the sixties, American
Speaker 3: distrust of government has been matched by a massive expansion
Speaker 3: of governmental intrusion, all of which suggests that our modern
Speaker 3: distrust of government carries with it a different flavor, a
Speaker 3: flavor of the conspiratorial. The founders believed that ambition was
Speaker 3: common to all men, and that ambition thus had to
Speaker 3: counteract ambition. Today's Americans instead believed that the problem is
Speaker 3: that our government is staffed by uniquely bad men. The
Speaker 3: Founders were right, the corruption of government is innately connected
Speaker 3: to its scope. But today's Americans instead believed that the
Speaker 3: corruption of government is simply a question of the wrong
Speaker 3: people controlling the government. The problem isn't the government with
Speaker 3: too much power, but a government controlled by enemies. Now,
Speaker 3: undoubtedly there are awful people. There are awful people in
Speaker 3: government and their eyes it's a joke, And certainly there
Speaker 3: have been conspiracies of such awful people within government, see
Speaker 3: for example, the Anthony fauci Let attacks by career staffers
Speaker 3: on those who oppose COVID nineteen lockdowns. But if we
Speaker 3: miss attribute broad and endemic problems of government to such
Speaker 3: conspiracies despite all available evidence. We miss the point. We
Speaker 3: maintain the size and scope of government while hunting shadows
Speaker 3: and training ourselves to distrust our own eyes and the process. Hey,
Speaker 3: you can't trust your own eyes and ears at this point.
Speaker 3: I just said this in a livestream, you motherfucker. Sospiracies exist,
Speaker 3: Ben Shapiro says, but they require evidence otherwise their conspiracy theories.
Speaker 3: And a country that falls for conspiracy theories without any
Speaker 3: supporting evidence is a country ripe for the plucking by
Speaker 3: demagogues on all sides. So that's that's the brilliant hot
Speaker 3: take by old Ben Shapiro.
Speaker 4: All Right, you guys ready to watch the Weekly Dump.
Speaker 4: You guys ready for that. Let's do it, and then
Speaker 4: we'll get into some weird old old the old old Gladio.
Speaker 4: I guess you could say that the fucking the people
Speaker 4: that ruled the world back in the day. But we're
Speaker 4: gonna play the Weekly Dump, which is a super cut
Speaker 4: of the Morning Dump, which is what me and Austin's
Speaker 4: daily show we do. It's pretty much daily, i'd say,
Speaker 4: like five to seven days a week, almost daily, if
Speaker 4: not daily, depends on what's going on, but you know
Speaker 4: it is every day at ten am Eastern, you can
Speaker 4: pretty much find either me or Austin or me and
Speaker 4: Austin doing a morning dump where we hang out with
Speaker 4: you guys, shoot the shit, kind of a hangout vibe.
Speaker 4: We go over some content with you guys. If there's
Speaker 4: stuff you guys content you want us to cover, you
Speaker 4: tag us in it, or you put it in the chat,
Speaker 4: we'll do it there. Just very much. It's a fun
Speaker 4: hang I think I enjoy it. But uh, with that,
Speaker 4: this is a little bit of a sample and a
Speaker 4: little bit of fun time, and then we'll transition into
Speaker 4: the call in portion of the show. Let's go and play.
Speaker 1: Top lobs of productions.
Speaker 4: From the beginning of Israel has changed their name to
Speaker 4: make it sound more Middle Eastern. And someone said orange
Speaker 4: Owen Scharrier got shy last night. Sure he did. I
Speaker 4: don't know, Okay. So now now essentially we're dealing with
Speaker 4: FBI joint CIA operations. They're flagrantly just you know, disregarding
Speaker 4: their mandate as a c I A because that is
Speaker 4: not something they're supposed to do. So can you imagine
Speaker 4: if like, we come to find out that I don't
Speaker 4: know that a Trump received funds from Hamas, and then
Speaker 4: the military decide, okay, we got to kill him, and
Speaker 4: they like Israel.
Speaker 10: That that is what is happening on a daily basis. Brother,
Speaker 10: You know what I mean, utilize these these Palestinians as
Speaker 10: human shields which have replaced the dogs and the robots.
Speaker 4: As a CIA operative by a local newspaper which accused
Speaker 4: him of filtering money to military papers to finance in
Speaker 4: nineteen sixty four coup. There you go.
Speaker 3: There's are okay, aren't they all of them?
Speaker 4: Oh? My god, shit, yeah, like and then.
Speaker 3: A month warn't that way and all of the justification,
Speaker 3: of course being anti Semitism. So honestly, I've been very
Speaker 3: concerned about the reality of the blockchaines.
Speaker 4: Being ethnically cleanse the Christians, Alloyites, the Kurds.
Speaker 3: And under his commit his army is actually slutering of
Speaker 3: what these spooks are truly doing as far as they're
Speaker 3: they're attempting to usher through the manufactured consent for more
Speaker 3: regime change operations more of the fourth time.
Speaker 4: Other reason, Oh, they're branding so off so present most
Speaker 4: cute kind of like I know something something's off about her.
Speaker 4: She looks like maybe since her Unite defect something. But
Speaker 4: either way, going.
Speaker 7: Down, that's what we're saying. Attorneys tell the truth.
Speaker 1: It was really a weird.
Speaker 4: Get a little sandy hook. What do you think of that?
Speaker 4: I'm not supposed to say that. Damn it, I fucked up.
Speaker 4: He was all entirely fake injury.
Speaker 7: They dismissed the case, but then it forestalled his ability
Speaker 7: to still be in the military.
Speaker 4: So actually suicide yourself.
Speaker 3: Yeah, just the destabilization methods of of kind of the
Speaker 3: George Soros funded Color revolutions.
Speaker 10: And the Eyes would like to meet you and see
Speaker 10: if you're the title does.
Speaker 1: Sanna know that you left the work?
Speaker 4: You see how it's framed is this was a mistake.
Speaker 4: So the kind of gives because of the skill and
Speaker 4: courage of our troops.
Speaker 1: It very.
Speaker 4: As well, So it's.
Speaker 3: Like basically an intelligence headquarters, yes, exactly, and it's very
Speaker 3: obviously rigged with audio visual blackmail. I would imagine, I
Speaker 3: don't know, alex Is j that's what they said. All right, thankster,
Speaker 3: yeah bank brother, hell yeah, ud.
Speaker 4: All right, Well we're in the call in portion of
Speaker 4: the show today, guys, nine for one two eight one
Speaker 4: five eight five seven. If you are patrons of me
Speaker 4: or Austin, we do put out a link every week
Speaker 4: to where you can come in for a video call.
Speaker 4: I see back back there. I don't know. And we've
Speaker 4: also like with that, we've accumulated a group of people
Speaker 4: who liked just watch backstage okay, and we do kind
Speaker 4: of sometimes hang out with them after. So like I
Speaker 4: kind of like to see this become a thing, like hey,
Speaker 4: we give them a streamyard link at the you know,
Speaker 4: at the two dollars level for the the so like, yo,
Speaker 4: pop in, you can hang out behind there. We even
Speaker 4: will like kind of talk with shoot the ship after
Speaker 4: the show. We've done that, so like whatever, like gonna
Speaker 4: make a little party. So uh, just saying you don't
Speaker 4: even have to actually come in. I don't even know, Bobo.
Speaker 4: You let us know in the chat, private chat, Bobo,
Speaker 4: if you actually want to come on, we can shoot
Speaker 4: the ship.
Speaker 7: I know.
Speaker 4: I saw you complaining this morning rate when we were
Speaker 4: ended that we didn't that I didn't provide a retraction
Speaker 4: for your weather Irish story or whatever you did. You
Speaker 4: missed it. It was a I believe yesterday I think
Speaker 4: I did it.
Speaker 3: It was a date.
Speaker 4: Last day I did a solo show without Austin. I
Speaker 4: covered it. I think, yeah, I had. There was a
Speaker 4: day I had Tyler on, so I did cover it.
Speaker 3: So damn Tim, stop stirring the pot and the chat dog.
Speaker 3: That's all I know, right, A pixie talking shit to
Speaker 3: us this information. Dude, Yeah, how dare you fire picture?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 4: I love you. I don't know why you're doing that,
Speaker 4: but let's get into some weird old timey ship. I
Speaker 4: keep trying to broach it, and you keep being all
Speaker 4: dodgy about it, and it's almost like if you were like, no, no, no,
Speaker 4: are you related to Ben Franklin or something? Are you
Speaker 4: a Jew?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 3: My god, I swear to god, Hey man, I addressed
Speaker 3: this first thing on Indias. Don't you dare make this
Speaker 3: a thing? No, I swear. Remember when people were asking
Speaker 3: in the chat because of my fucking nose if I
Speaker 3: was Jewish. The first thing that happened when I went
Speaker 3: on Nephlin Death Squad was someone noticed my nose is
Speaker 3: massive and fucking asked if I was a Jew. And
Speaker 3: so the first thing I had to do was was
Speaker 3: was explain away the fact that no, it's I swear
Speaker 3: I'm not Jewish guys exactly. Roman knows you bastards. How
Speaker 3: dare you consistently put me in this fucking corner? Yeah,
Speaker 3: but no, it is so hilarious that I don't ever
Speaker 3: play Devil's Advocate, and the one time that I do,
Speaker 3: we get a segment that that apparently is going to
Speaker 3: resurface over and over again, which is totally fun, hilarious.
Speaker 4: It's gonna be purpose coming in playing playing fucking playing
Speaker 4: playing Savior for the Jews. Fucking Yeah.
Speaker 3: Meanwhile, this morning.
Speaker 4: You're like Captain Saving's Advocate for the Oh my god.
Speaker 3: Okay, so let's get into some content. Yeah, we don't
Speaker 3: actually discuss this, so basically, Boomer sooner and go fund yourself.
Speaker 3: So I should show you first of all, because this
Speaker 3: is absolutely insane. This whole fucking article is nuts, and
Speaker 3: it made me kind of reconsider things.
Speaker 4: Already we knew that this was by way, I have
Speaker 4: a called out coming up, so go to keep going.
Speaker 4: I'll set it up.
Speaker 3: Yeah, So, Jules, this is for you anyway, for the
Speaker 3: most part, not really, I mean, because I was reading
Speaker 3: it anyway.
Speaker 7: But I did a whole deep dive on the on
Speaker 7: the hell Fire Club, not like it falls in but
Speaker 7: yeah with your act like a documentary.
Speaker 3: True, what the fuck are you doing?
Speaker 5: It?
Speaker 3: Said? The host has muted my screen, but I'm not host.
Speaker 3: I'm not muted, right.
Speaker 4: Did I mute you? I'm sorry? I was trying to
Speaker 4: push too many buttons. Sorry, who ever called call back?
Speaker 4: I fucked up. I clicked the wrong buttons. I was
Speaker 4: trying to do too many things at once. This is
Speaker 4: why we need like a real professional producer and like
Speaker 4: a reel set up for how we do call ins.
Speaker 4: But we'll get there. I think that's what we're working
Speaker 4: on with a top Lobster Productions. We're working on a
Speaker 4: production team. But sorry, you ever did the call back in?
Speaker 4: I was literally about to answer and then you drop,
Speaker 4: So go ahead and do that. All right? There we go?
Speaker 4: All right, I'm leaving now.
Speaker 3: Can you guys hear me?
Speaker 4: Still?
Speaker 3: Thought? Everyone hear me?
Speaker 4: Let me know?
Speaker 3: Uh yeah no, so uh fucking Lance Rip?
Speaker 4: How dare you? Dude?
Speaker 3: Why are you doing this to me? I'm just like, wow,
Speaker 3: you guys need to calm down. And Tim, you had
Speaker 3: to bring it on to X too, dude, Like, how
Speaker 3: dare you?
Speaker 4: Tweet?
Speaker 3: About that ship, forcing me, forcing me to respond and
Speaker 3: address Austin.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I got I got it. I got them set up.
Speaker 4: I'm sorry, I gotta set up and I want to
Speaker 4: get it. What before I fuck it up? All right?
Speaker 4: You are on with Austin and Jose. I'm already dead.
Speaker 4: We also got young Jules producer with us. Uh, what's up?
Speaker 4: What would it do? We got any questions for the crew?
Speaker 4: What's up?
Speaker 7: Yeah?
Speaker 6: Yeah, what's going on?
Speaker 5: Know?
Speaker 6: What's going down?
Speaker 7: Rage child?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 6: I guess I was kind of this kind of in
Speaker 6: my guess, but maybe I could kind of tighten for
Speaker 6: a couple of weeks. It's been kind of in my head,
Speaker 6: but I was wondering, and it kind of goes with
Speaker 6: the catch and the right team because I was thinking, like, man,
Speaker 6: you know how there's like a lot of those serio
Speaker 6: killings and crazy shit going on in the seventies. So
Speaker 6: I was thinking of which kind of a movie I
Speaker 6: liked as a kid is the Amityville Horror? So I
Speaker 6: was like thinking, how, you know when also did the
Speaker 6: series on The Green Brave Murders. It's kind of early seventies,
Speaker 6: but I guess Amityville is like seventy four.
Speaker 3: I think, dude, Amityville's crazy and I have to do
Speaker 3: an episode.
Speaker 6: Think it's sometime in November, So it's November thirteenth, nineteen
Speaker 6: seventy four. They said Ronald de Fayo went and just
Speaker 6: like fucking messaged like six of his family members. But
Speaker 6: also I've be hearing like a lot of stuff recently
Speaker 6: with Catcher in the Rye and he talks about halfway
Speaker 6: between November two and December fourteenth, which is November eighteenth,
Speaker 6: which is day three two two. But I know, but
Speaker 6: it's kind of, you know, still going November second and
Speaker 6: December fourteenth would be kind of November thirteenth if you
Speaker 6: suck at math. So he did that ship then, and
Speaker 6: then I don't know if that Yeah, just one question
Speaker 6: kind of attention of it is if if Austin or
Speaker 6: in of y'all want to or think if that goes into,
Speaker 6: you know, some of the other crazy murder shit they
Speaker 6: were doing, because it is all on the East Coast
Speaker 6: and they're just going rampant over there, and I'm maybe
Speaker 6: the fail was into that drug shit, then he had
Speaker 6: to be something. I don't know. Anyway, back to the
Speaker 6: Catcher in the right part, so he has to go
Speaker 6: to like talk to the dean or some shit, and
Speaker 6: then the Dean like, would you like to know what
Speaker 6: you wrote? And I was thinking, like, why the funk
Speaker 6: would he have to know what he wrote it? Why
Speaker 6: would why would he want to know unless it's like
Speaker 6: my first thought was what's his name, Sir Hans where
Speaker 6: he's just writing it, doesn't know what what while he
Speaker 6: wrote it, So he's like, would you like to know
Speaker 6: why what you wrote? And yeah, and you know you
Speaker 6: you obviously know what the rest of the ship with
Speaker 6: the casher in the rye goes about them just all
Speaker 6: being fucking hypnotized and ship like that kind of not knowing,
Speaker 6: and then they goes into because it's the I think
Speaker 6: the essay or whatever he had to write about the
Speaker 6: Egyptian so that's also interesting there. Yeah, and then he
Speaker 6: talked about being a great liar and he mentioned something.
Speaker 6: I don't have all the ship in front of me,
Speaker 6: but he mentioned something someone told him. It's like it's
Speaker 6: a game, and if you're not in it then it's nothing.
Speaker 6: But if you're like a hot shot, then you know,
Speaker 6: then you understand the game kind of paraphrasing but damn.
Speaker 6: But and then all the repetition that goes in the
Speaker 6: fucking book. He's like what he always I can't think
Speaker 6: of what he says, but it's the same with so
Speaker 6: his diary is like the same ship over and over
Speaker 6: and over.
Speaker 4: That I was kind of like some earlier if people go, oh,
Speaker 4: you're possessed by demons, You're like, okay, what does that mean?
Speaker 4: It's like something.
Speaker 6: Else, same with That's what that kind of made me
Speaker 6: think about the Ambi Deville ship, because I don't know,
Speaker 6: obviously they you know, they say de bunked and they
Speaker 6: just want to sell books. And but that's still kind
Speaker 6: of crazy. How you just go in there and do
Speaker 6: all that ship to your family.
Speaker 11: Yeah, and it's like obviously the mainstream narrative like they
Speaker 11: just wanted to sell some books. So yeah, I'm gonna
Speaker 11: dig a little further and just curious.
Speaker 4: Thinking about family to sell some books.
Speaker 11: Yeah, he's.
Speaker 6: Eating fucking bologney with no cheese, but fuck it alone.
Speaker 4: Even cheese was real quick, and I just wanted to
Speaker 4: see what.
Speaker 6: Also, what the up? I mean, I listen to this
Speaker 6: all the time.
Speaker 4: What's good to hear? Yeah?
Speaker 11: Yeah, I know, I'm gonna hang out here real quick
Speaker 11: and listen to what you're saying.
Speaker 4: Hell yeah, Well, appreciate you calling in. It was nice
Speaker 4: to talk to you. Uh. It is good to hear
Speaker 4: from you. I do see you. I do appreciate you
Speaker 4: tagging us in the chat. I mean, we do bring
Speaker 4: up your topics a lot.
Speaker 6: So yeah, I appreciate you'll shout you know, it's the
Speaker 6: race holding it down for the underground.
Speaker 4: Hell yeah, brother, Oh yeah, dude, all right, hell yeah,
Speaker 4: hang up. Appreciate dude, good one. We'll see again. Brother,
Speaker 4: all right, we'll do all right, see you, bud By,
Speaker 4: all right, see it all right, there you go, all
Speaker 4: right cool. It was a good call back to the
Speaker 4: weirdness in the past watching.
Speaker 3: All I'll address what did you schedules? Some just shout
Speaker 3: shout out to the race.
Speaker 7: Shout. He was one of like my first YouTube rightbe viewers.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so say man, he's been there from almost day
Speaker 3: one and field yea O G. Yeah, nothing but love
Speaker 3: for the raid child. But yeah he brings up catcher
Speaker 3: in the rye surround sirhound like that that draws in
Speaker 3: every element, honestly, right, like rossa Crucian process. Yeah, Jad Salinger.
Speaker 4: Wasn't it, absolutely, man, Just like what the fuck?
Speaker 3: Yeah, hang out hung out with friends who were affiliated
Speaker 3: with the Local Processed Church Chapter in l A at
Speaker 3: the time, which had just kind of like, uh, you know,
Speaker 3: basically had commuted down there to to uh Los Angeles
Speaker 3: from San Francisco and Cole Street there where you had
Speaker 3: you had the direct influence on Charles Manson when he
Speaker 3: he absconded and uh and was reassigned probation officers, which
Speaker 3: is totally just like unprecedented in many ways, especially considering
Speaker 3: his his his past and hit and criminal history. Uh.
Speaker 4: But yeah, JD.
Speaker 3: Salinger, who wrote The Catcher and the Rye, I brought
Speaker 3: this up whenever William came on. It blew my fucking mind. Man,
Speaker 3: I had no idea.
Speaker 4: JD.
Speaker 3: Salinger member of the Richie Boys, secretive Jewish combat intelligence
Speaker 3: group on the Western Front from nineteen forty five to
Speaker 3: nineteen to nineteen.
Speaker 4: Forty four to forty five.
Speaker 3: Rich every single fuck It's crazy, but you you look
Speaker 3: into these connections and he was involved in psychological operations,
Speaker 3: He was involved in actually interrogating Nazi SS members. It
Speaker 3: seems like he was actually protecting and facilitating the Gladio
Speaker 3: networks and the rat lines as they were being set
Speaker 3: up while while interrogating and really just kind of like
Speaker 3: briefing a lot of these paper clip Nazis and going, hey,
Speaker 3: what do you have to offer us? We provide me
Speaker 3: the techniques that specifically that you've sophisticated and utilized over time. Okay,
Speaker 3: appreciate that. We'll embrace those techniques and we'll bring you
Speaker 3: on in the draft, buddy, you know what I mean.
Speaker 3: And that's really what happened. They were recruited and so
Speaker 3: at a certain point, you know, you have to kind
Speaker 3: of like really question what was the catcher and the
Speaker 3: ride because again you see this all this like layered
Speaker 3: symbology as the pre you know, the subtext that's kind
Speaker 3: of playing out before your eyes that very much is
Speaker 3: it's so much like embedded within repetitive mind control techniques,
Speaker 3: you know what I'm saying, Where Like it reminded me
Speaker 3: of Sir Han every single damn time, and of course
Speaker 3: William brought that to my attention. But when Sir Han
Speaker 3: will remember he's hypnotized right in a hypnotic trance in
Speaker 3: order to have him relive the event under hypnosis while
Speaker 3: he's going through trial, and he's asked, who was with
Speaker 3: you when you shot him? And this is a professor
Speaker 3: who's skilled expert and hypnosis, Sirhan writes on a piece
Speaker 3: of paper, Girl, The Girl, The Girl. His only other
Speaker 3: recollection was of being choked by someone on a table
Speaker 3: in the pantry. This had indeed taken place. One of
Speaker 3: the men escorting Kennedy had grabbed him in a headlock
Speaker 3: to try to stop him pumping out more bullocks because
Speaker 3: he wouldn't stop. He was in a trance. He said
Speaker 3: that he saw targets in front of his eyes as
Speaker 3: if he were at the shooting range, and that basically
Speaker 3: what had happened was that when he was tackled to
Speaker 3: the ground by you know, so he's tackled the ground
Speaker 3: and he won't stop pulling an imaginary trigger. And when
Speaker 3: he's put in the hypnotic trance and trial in the
Speaker 3: trial by the prosecution and the defense, what happens when
Speaker 3: they lead the witness, They truly lead the witness to
Speaker 3: such an extent it's extraordinary. It should have been illegal
Speaker 3: to have conducted themselves in this way. What you know
Speaker 3: you're shooting or if you're shooting Robert Kennedy. Now Sir Han,
Speaker 3: They're like telling him what he's doing, it's so crazy,
Speaker 3: And so then he starts convulsing, and he starts fucking
Speaker 3: he can't fucking say shit, it's crazy, and he just
Speaker 3: starts pulling an imaginary trigger and he won't stop until
Speaker 3: he's brought out of the trance. And they say that
Speaker 3: he's so suggestible that it obviously suggests the fact that
Speaker 3: he had been hypnotized many many times prior to to
Speaker 3: to these moments in the.
Speaker 4: Deep level programming like this is where people talk about
Speaker 4: like monarch, Like I really feel like if I know,
Speaker 4: like when you get deep into Sirhan, it's like there
Speaker 4: is the times that you know where he's the hospital
Speaker 4: before that, but I mean I think that it's like
Speaker 4: the I mean, I feel like this guy be like
Speaker 4: lifelong shit going on with him. Like yeah, I don't
Speaker 4: know how it exactly it works out, but like when
Speaker 4: you work at the horse track, the horse race track,
Speaker 4: I think it was Losalamto, So I can't remember now
Speaker 4: where he was working, but I think it was that
Speaker 4: that that was the racetrack, but there was some like
Speaker 4: if I recall it, I'm recalling vaguely some sort of
Speaker 4: Clint or something that he didn't visit for a long period.
Speaker 4: So that's where a lot of people attribute that likely
Speaker 4: he probably was hypnotized there. I think it was some
Speaker 4: sort of navy facility or something, or some sort of
Speaker 4: navy intel intelligence. Yeah, there you go. So like since
Speaker 4: our naval intelligence facility was nearby that, like people kind
Speaker 4: of presume he may have been treated. I forget if
Speaker 4: there's anything to uphold that, but either way, my point being,
Speaker 4: it's like a so people like cause you know, obviously
Speaker 4: you're like really like like it was. This couldn't have
Speaker 4: just been like a one time he's met the guy.
Speaker 4: He had to been programmed. He's like some people point
Speaker 4: to that. I'm like, I don't know. I think that, like,
Speaker 4: especially when you look at the fact that he was
Speaker 4: involved with like Rosicrucianism and like other in the level
Speaker 4: to which it seems like he was programmed. It seems
Speaker 4: like and how suggestible of an individual he was, because
Speaker 4: there were people like multiple hypnosis and hypnotists that made
Speaker 4: claims to a test the fact that he was like
Speaker 4: some of the most one of the more suggestible people
Speaker 4: they've ever seen, and It's like, so that's like that
Speaker 4: almost seems like selected, like he got selected from a
Speaker 4: young age and and to some extent probably pushed into that.
Speaker 4: So it's like, mana baby, And I was just thinking
Speaker 4: because Monarch, you know, gets kind of if you follow
Speaker 4: the track, it kind of goes up to like the
Speaker 4: Nazi drograms and stuff. It's like, what were they do?
Speaker 4: Was Jones? Was? Was the Nazi stuff? A lot a
Speaker 4: lot of that, almost like a big Jones sound project,
Speaker 4: Like you had the youth programs and shit, Like what
Speaker 4: were they doing in that ship? What the fuck was
Speaker 4: going on there?
Speaker 7: Right?
Speaker 4: Yeah, like exactly imagine, Yeah, and that's where we get
Speaker 4: our school system from is from Like that is like
Speaker 4: the Prussian system, which was kind of essentially the same
Speaker 4: thing being used by the Nazis because we don't really
Speaker 4: like they were using the Prussian school system. The Prussians
Speaker 4: were what preceded the them essentially, like that was what
Speaker 4: that was. So like they used that to like to
Speaker 4: essentially try to inspire their youth to have this like
Speaker 4: innate you know that you know that fifty percent whatever,
Speaker 4: Like everyone believed the JFK thing, But the JFK thing
Speaker 4: before that was from what they were trying to breed
Speaker 4: into them with the Prussian schooling system like that. Remember
Speaker 4: that used to be good. It doesn't work as well anymore, apparently, right.
Speaker 3: You remember was at Rudolph hess who who was the
Speaker 3: SS member who made the claim when he was he
Speaker 3: was brought to you know, the what the fuck is
Speaker 3: the name of the trials Damnit Nuremberg? When he was
Speaker 3: brought to Nuremberg and he had to testify, I'm trying
Speaker 3: to remember who was Himmler. Himmler Himmler who said, yeah,
Speaker 3: we were a nation under mind control and they cut
Speaker 3: off his mic like it was fucking nuts. Yes, dude,
Speaker 3: this really happened. And so for me personally, I think
Speaker 3: they utilized those techniques on a national scale and and
Speaker 3: it was something that was unprecedented and and it was
Speaker 3: it was you consider who we're controlling the hierarchy of
Speaker 3: the Nazi SS. That alone, it's a bunch of Jewish occultists. Man, Like,
Speaker 3: it makes no sense, you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 4: And you all know, well, it's kind of like you
Speaker 4: bring that Jones sound example. It's like people look at
Speaker 4: like the World War Two and they're like if you
Speaker 4: look at it from that perspective as like no, that
Speaker 4: was a nationwide jonestown. It's like, no, look at the people,
Speaker 4: the people in the cult or whatever, the people's temple
Speaker 4: or whatever. They were like mostly poor minorities. And it's
Speaker 4: the same idea here. So it's like you see the
Speaker 4: Germans or even I guess you could say the Jewish
Speaker 4: people or whoever, the people that were downtrodden that system.
Speaker 4: It's like, yo, dude, they were being like fucked with,
Speaker 4: like these are like and yeah, it's like, no, we're
Speaker 4: not saying nazis good. You know, like if anything, like
Speaker 4: the higher up you get up this chain, the more
Speaker 4: that like, the more fucked up it is, like we're
Speaker 4: still saying it's bad. But it's like, I think it
Speaker 4: may not be what you think it is. It's like,
Speaker 4: you know, like I don't know, I think there it's
Speaker 4: not that crazy. They're like Jewish elites or just elites
Speaker 4: in general, are completely willing to sell out their own
Speaker 4: people because they're they are just as a Jewish elite is,
Speaker 4: as far from a Jewish peasant as as a Jewish
Speaker 4: elite is for me, like it makes no difference to
Speaker 4: them they're just as willing to sell them out. So
Speaker 4: this whole idea of like this class solidarity fucking ridiculous.
Speaker 4: Like people need to break this mind virus of like
Speaker 4: this like identity nonsense of Like no, that's what's gonna
Speaker 4: get you in trouble. Like this idea that you're thinking
Speaker 4: as an as a is a identity block, is not
Speaker 4: gonna work out well for the long run. So like
Speaker 4: they're gonna sell you out and they're gonna fucking whoop
Speaker 4: get out of there while you're dealing with the final
Speaker 4: solution or whatever. You know exactly well, they're chilling.
Speaker 3: You know, mm hmm yep, and uh and that is why,
Speaker 3: like I think it was Rudolph hess to be honest,
Speaker 3: I don't think it was Himmler, but who knows. I
Speaker 3: am Hendler killed himself. Uh yeah, but again it's been
Speaker 3: a while since I researched that. I just remember there's
Speaker 3: a quote specifically, he's on Mike Man and they cut
Speaker 3: his mic when he says this, we were under mind
Speaker 3: control and he says a nation under mind control. And
Speaker 3: it was just like one of the most fascinating things
Speaker 3: that you could take away from the Nuremberg trials because
Speaker 3: again they cut his fucking mic. They didn't want him
Speaker 3: to present this as a reality. And but anyway, so
Speaker 3: the whole point of why I brought up eighteenth century
Speaker 3: hell fire clubs is because there there seems to be Uh.
Speaker 3: Of course, there's a precedent for these sadistic networks of abuse,
Speaker 3: especially considering you know, child's trafficking, and and really I
Speaker 3: would say rituals. I think it's sex rituals that involve
Speaker 3: minorities or I'm not minorities minors, but yeh, but but
Speaker 3: I mean it does seem to be the case as
Speaker 3: far as you look into these uh, this hell fire
Speaker 3: club right, and again, if you want to bring it up,
Speaker 3: it is actually what I'm discussing now. And I think
Speaker 3: I have it shared. But uh, do I have it shared?
Speaker 1: Do I need to?
Speaker 4: You have nothing? Short?
Speaker 5: Oh?
Speaker 4: You mean you shared it yourself? This, yeah, accellently do
Speaker 4: it when you did the damn it? Oh you're good.
Speaker 3: I think I can clicking the same time, I think
Speaker 3: it's interesting because it involves something called the feast of Venus,
Speaker 3: and it involves these of course, these neo pagan philosophies
Speaker 3: and ideologies that involve a Bacchus, this the minotaur Dionysus
Speaker 3: Gilgamesh of course, and then this this notion of modern Babylon,
Speaker 3: which I think is very important. And I saw someone
Speaker 3: in the chat who actually their name was something that
Speaker 3: had to do with Babylon, which I think is perfect honestly.
Speaker 4: That's his wife.
Speaker 3: Really, that's hilarious, but it is. It's a great name
Speaker 3: because it's it truly.
Speaker 4: Is speaking of owned by the Jews. She was arguing
Speaker 4: about the Jews and the Chat. I see, I think
Speaker 4: I think we got Jeweles here is on Big Old.
Speaker 4: He's the infiltrator.
Speaker 3: You know, Jules has had a very pivotal impact on me.
Speaker 3: He's influenced me in the wrong direction. And I apologize.
Speaker 3: But now so check this out honestly, and I'll stop sharing.
Speaker 3: I'll share it one more time so we can look
Speaker 3: at it because it has like there are a few
Speaker 3: pictures that are worthwhile and bring it to the table.
Speaker 3: Oh shit, is that that's not meway to go? Oh
Speaker 3: I didn't know, And then just fucking with you. There
Speaker 3: we go, there we go. Okay, So what's interesting to
Speaker 3: me is that you have something that's referenced here and
Speaker 3: it's a series of articles that were written and published
Speaker 3: in eighteen eighty five and they're called the Maiden Tribute
Speaker 3: of Modern Babylon. And it's very very interesting. And this
Speaker 3: is on Hotstar dot net and they have a really
Speaker 3: it's a brilliant archive of like a lot of the
Speaker 3: Chickenhawk research, which is is I think it very important
Speaker 3: for people to at least be aware of, so utilize
Speaker 3: this resource as often as you can. There there's not
Speaker 3: a huge archive. It's not super deep as far as
Speaker 3: the what what it covers, but what it does cover,
Speaker 3: it covers very much in depth and at a at
Speaker 3: a legitimate, you know, level of detail, which I think
Speaker 3: is very important. So point being is that there's a
Speaker 3: footprint here that you can trace back to the eighteenth century.
Speaker 3: Obviously I would think far far, you know, you can
Speaker 3: trace that back a lot further than that as well,
Speaker 3: but I do think that as far as like modern context.
Speaker 3: And again, as this is framed, even the the title
Speaker 3: itself made in Tribute of Modern Babylon, it's it's the
Speaker 3: perfect way to describe how exactly the hell Fire Clubs
Speaker 3: kind of paved the way for the modern kind of
Speaker 3: infant structure of sexual blackmail, which is really what it
Speaker 3: amounts to, you know, and again you think about the
Speaker 3: Pilgrim society. Uh, look at what a monolithic, a monolithic
Speaker 3: Anglo American block is essentially what this is referred to as.
Speaker 3: And look who's involved. So we'll start at the beginning
Speaker 3: for a moment, just to introduce in early July eighteen
Speaker 3: eighty five, a journalist and prominent member of British high society,
Speaker 3: again a usual suspect who would know by by kind
Speaker 3: of having a direct connection to this clandestine infrastructure in
Speaker 3: its infancy in many ways sexual magic and minorities by Austink. Dude,
Speaker 3: that's too funny. So William f Stead is this investigative
Speaker 3: journalist and published this four part series on and apparently
Speaker 3: it was in something called Paul Mall Gazette entitled The
Speaker 3: Main and Tribute of Modern Babalon and.
Speaker 4: Exactly what a Jewish infiltrator would say. I wasn't standing
Speaker 4: up for the Jews.
Speaker 3: That's too great. So in these articles Steat exposes this
Speaker 3: highly organized child sex trafficking industry and the way he
Speaker 3: exposes it, he describes it as operating tacitly throughout a
Speaker 3: network of London brothels. This industry, Stead wrote was used
Speaker 3: to service members of the aristocracy, along with other high
Speaker 3: powered individuals within institutions, legal, religious, political, and otherwise. Another
Speaker 3: point reinforcing the dialectical the dialectical deception that's playing out
Speaker 3: at all times that we often discuss, which of course
Speaker 3: is ideological subversion, but it's the spiritual target, you know
Speaker 3: what I mean. And I think that again when you
Speaker 3: have people not really addressing the fact that, of course
Speaker 3: organized religion would be exploited and leveraged against you know,
Speaker 3: the average person who can't quite maybe they're not as
Speaker 3: well versed in a lot of these issues, or they
Speaker 3: don't quite understand what propaganda is or how to interpret it.
Speaker 3: You know, they will definitely be influenced right by this.
Speaker 3: And so I think anyway, whole point being with so
Speaker 3: not only the aristocracy, but you have obviously high power
Speaker 3: to individuals within institutions, legal, religious, political and otherwise. With
Speaker 3: little girls aged anywhere from five to fifteen years, these
Speaker 3: girls were used to service a vice seemingly cultural in
Speaker 3: its pervasiveness, which lusted to violate the chastity of virgins
Speaker 3: in an extremity of ways. Stead was well situated to
Speaker 3: account for such things, as he himself was a member
Speaker 3: of the upper British class, and as such these articles
Speaker 3: were somewhat of an appeal to his peer group to
Speaker 3: stop violating or violently raping little girls, if not for
Speaker 3: moral decency, then for that of societal stability, citing a
Speaker 3: similar culture of vice ripe amongst the French aristocracy, which
Speaker 3: a century prior had contributed to the liberal use of
Speaker 3: the guillotine or the guillotine during these times of class tension.
Speaker 3: For who would show mercy during times of class agitation
Speaker 3: towards those who indiscriminately rape their daughters. Stead's status as
Speaker 3: a well connected civilizational scholar is evidenced by the fact
Speaker 3: he was a founding member of the Cecil Road Society.
Speaker 3: Check this out. The organizations that literally make up the
Speaker 3: Committee of three hundred, brother, you know, like that is
Speaker 3: what blew my mind. I instantly go back to the
Speaker 3: Committee of three hundred and what an overwhelming influence that
Speaker 3: the Royal Institute of International Affairs have had on essentially
Speaker 3: choosing you know, our politically.
Speaker 4: Limma hanging since back then. This is like the the
Speaker 4: anytime they're like, you know, the Feds are like, hey,
Speaker 4: we need to stop doing this. They're like, all right,
Speaker 4: get one of your journalists to get in on this.
Speaker 4: Let them. Haven't write an article. We need to kind
Speaker 4: of like, hey, guys, we need to stop raping five
Speaker 4: to fifteen year olds. All right, like not cool? Like,
Speaker 4: here's here's a four part series breakdown X Y and
Speaker 4: z Y. You shouldn't we maybe in the future, mean
Speaker 4: we don't do that. We're like, maybe be more quiet
Speaker 4: about it, I don't know, be less like open about it,
Speaker 4: because they're gonna cut our fucking heads off because we're
Speaker 4: just discriminately raping their children. They might not be too
Speaker 4: happy about this exactly. Yeah, like yeah, just like just
Speaker 4: shut the funk up, guys. Yeah, maybe something so brazen
Speaker 4: about this exactly.
Speaker 3: And of course the Cecil Roads Society, as I mentioned
Speaker 3: the Royal Institute of International Affairs, this is the group
Speaker 3: responsible for responsible for incubating these think tanks which you
Speaker 3: can instantly think of, the Council on Formulation.
Speaker 4: How long did it take to think that one up? Exactly?
Speaker 3: Man Like, it's honestly, man like, it is just.
Speaker 4: We've been thinking for months and we gave the exclusion.
Speaker 4: We just stop eRating children. Oh my god, what do
Speaker 4: you guys think? No, no, no, no, don't stop, just like stop
Speaker 4: talking about it.
Speaker 3: Oh my god, the rage child's going off. No, sir,
Speaker 3: stop it. That's so funny.
Speaker 4: But yeah, so it is.
Speaker 3: It is, honestly, man, it's it's an extraordinary precedent that
Speaker 3: you're witnessing as far as like instituting what I believe
Speaker 3: to be the modern in geocomplex that it is is
Speaker 3: uh really.
Speaker 4: Kind of exploited for plausible deniability reasons, almost alone in general,
Speaker 4: because you can kind of compartmentalize a lot of these
Speaker 4: operations and these networks. But but but yeah, so instead
Speaker 4: his status of course again he's he's a member of
Speaker 4: the Cecil Road Society and and also the Royal Institute
Speaker 4: of International Affairs. Then later the Council on Foreign Relations
Speaker 4: all were incubated as of course the think tanks directly consequentially.
Speaker 3: A result of Cecil Road Society. So it's important to
Speaker 3: point that out.
Speaker 4: This is a late eighteen hundred so I just wanted
Speaker 4: to point out, for we've been talking about the councilor
Speaker 4: Foreign Relations still comes up and so this is like
Speaker 4: kind of like a as you point out you can
Speaker 4: kind of follow the the the the the dots from
Speaker 4: like Council three hundred down to like kind of the
Speaker 4: modern version of like the Council Foreign Relations. So it's
Speaker 4: like just interesting to see like how these things stick around.
Speaker 4: I mean, not that there's anything like too meaningful to
Speaker 4: the beasts. I just wanted to point the pay attention.
Speaker 4: It's like, yeah, we talked about all the time. Yeah,
Speaker 4: we man, Yeah, we talk about the CFR. Well we're
Speaker 4: talk about all the time, but it does come up
Speaker 4: in these sort of discussions, and it's a big player,
Speaker 4: and it's yeah, been around, you know, over one hundred
Speaker 4: and fifty years at least.
Speaker 3: So yeah, yeah, And who was involved indirectly with the
Speaker 3: Rand Corporation and Laurel Canyon staging the countercultural revolution or
Speaker 3: undermining it in many ways, because it was really a
Speaker 3: way to and you know, at least in my mind,
Speaker 3: it was a way to undermine the naturally occurring, organic
Speaker 3: and genuine anti war movement at the time that was
Speaker 3: rejecting the Vietnam policies. And that was one reason.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 3: It's again, these are always layered objectives, and it's something
Speaker 3: that I think and it goes over the head of
Speaker 3: a lot of people. But anyway, so, yeah, Council on
Speaker 3: Formulations stitch together the foreign policy of English speaking nations
Speaker 3: into a monolithic Anglo American block. So you tie that
Speaker 3: into the Pilgrim Society and the American establishment public diplomacy.
Speaker 11: Right.
Speaker 3: Uh, that was the goal. Right, We're going to host
Speaker 3: these conferences which were very much clandestine in nature for
Speaker 3: the longest time, and we're going to invite all these
Speaker 3: various world leaders that we essentially uh in certain aspects,
Speaker 3: you know, put into power.
Speaker 4: And you know what I mean, show him a good time.
Speaker 3: He will show them a good time. Will will read
Speaker 3: them in on the agenda items and the objectives for
Speaker 3: this coming year. It was basically Davos, you know, just
Speaker 3: a more covert version of that. And so anyway, they
Speaker 3: get into more of the details here. And it's interesting
Speaker 3: because this this individual journalist named William F. Stead Steed Stead. Uh,
Speaker 3: he he's the he's the person who who of course
Speaker 3: pinned the Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon, the four part series.
Speaker 3: But what he kind of he compares this to it's
Speaker 3: crazy man, because he kind of starts to he uses
Speaker 3: these various quotes which bring into reference this labyrinth of neopaganism,
Speaker 3: which is strange as hell that he would kind of
Speaker 3: frame it in that way, but not at all when
Speaker 3: you consider the philosophy and the ideological perspective behind the
Speaker 3: organizations that he's referencing. It's it's just like you know,
Speaker 3: you start to realize. In eighteen eighty five, listen to
Speaker 3: this for example, July sixth, eighteen eighty five, the pall
Speaker 3: Mull Gazette. He says London's lust annually uses up many
Speaker 3: thousands of women who are literally killed and made away
Speaker 3: with living sacrifices, slain in the service of vice that
Speaker 3: may be inevitable, and with that I have nothing to do.
Speaker 3: But I do ask that those do to the house
Speaker 3: of evil, of evil fame shall not be trapped into
Speaker 3: it unwillingly, and that none shall be beguiled into the
Speaker 3: chamber of death before they are of an age. To
Speaker 3: read the inscription above the portal, all hope abandoned, ye
Speaker 3: who enters here. If the daughters of the people must
Speaker 3: be served up as dainty morsels to minister to the
Speaker 3: passions of the rich, let them at least attain an
Speaker 3: age when they can understand the nature of the sacrifice
Speaker 3: which they are asked to make. Like that alone us.
Speaker 3: How he's framing this network man of aristocratic sadis I mean,
Speaker 3: that's what he's describing, you know.
Speaker 4: I mean, I bet you because the way he framed
Speaker 4: that makes it sound like the implication is that they're
Speaker 4: literally buying these children from their parents exactly which they
Speaker 4: probably are, but like the idea so because as you
Speaker 4: read that, he's talking about the idea of like wait
Speaker 4: till they can so the idea being like, no, you
Speaker 4: can't buy them from their family unto their least of
Speaker 4: age to be able to make that decision. Of the movie.
Speaker 7: There's a banned movie never seen it, but I've heard
Speaker 7: of it called Salo, and it's about the French aristocracy
Speaker 7: basically buying kid It's it's a terrible film. It's basically
Speaker 7: a snuff film, but it's it's it's banned in the
Speaker 7: US definitely, but probably many more countries. But it's it's them,
Speaker 7: just it, dude, it's them just telling us basically.
Speaker 3: That makes sense, but.
Speaker 4: So they do. I did find it interesting, I know,
Speaker 4: so scanned that they refer to this as almost like
Speaker 4: a minotaur and like a labyrinth you found like they'd
Speaker 4: be an interesting you know, like is there something to
Speaker 4: that because I know something about like the legend of
Speaker 4: how the minotaur works. It's guys, this dark monster that
Speaker 4: like kind of takes innocence or whatever, you know, like the.
Speaker 3: Acrifice nine virgin minors to the Mentaara day in the
Speaker 3: labyrinth and got it sac that it procures the victims. Dude,
Speaker 3: it's nuts. Honestly, Can you guys riff for like five
Speaker 3: seconds while I go take a.
Speaker 4: Conversation real quick, send the link over to the fucking
Speaker 4: you're supposed to. We're supposed to be sending these a
Speaker 4: private chat. We have a producer sitting right here, have
Speaker 4: him here.
Speaker 3: Man, I know exactly where things are just from already
Speaker 3: you know, kind of going through it, and so that's
Speaker 3: the only reason that But I will send it right
Speaker 3: away for sure.
Speaker 4: Yeah, because this is particularly interesting. I think where we
Speaker 4: can wrap. Dude, We're in an hour and a half.
Speaker 4: We can come back this. Are you okay? Come on?
Speaker 4: We got I'm just we're trying to ditch and we
Speaker 4: don't even access to scroll through this. So are you
Speaker 4: gonna be there tomorrow or no? Are you gonna be
Speaker 4: going into your dark hole tomorrow, like I.
Speaker 3: Gotta finally take the plunge and and that way. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I can get something done for my solo project. I
Speaker 3: need to actually make some headway.
Speaker 4: So okay, yeah, I was gonna say we could carry
Speaker 4: this on tomorrow, but okay, you go pee, I guess,
Speaker 4: and we'll for sure or something to start bringing a
Speaker 4: fucking large cover something. Yeah, you need a pist bottle
Speaker 4: bottle me and Jo Yeah, I do pist bottles. Why not, dude,
Speaker 4: I mean I don't do pis bottles. That bothers you. Alright, alright, alright,
Speaker 4: well I don't mean. I guess they're supposed to vamp
Speaker 4: and we can't and scroll through this fucking dickhead ship. Yeah,
Speaker 4: have you any thoughts on this from your I know,
Speaker 4: obviously your side of the table is more like the occult,
Speaker 4: so like, I don't know if any of this, you know,
Speaker 4: brought any thoughts into your head. I know they're supposed
Speaker 4: to be an ishtar stuff, but obviously we can't scroll
Speaker 4: through this because he's the hell Fire Club.
Speaker 7: There's there's this documentary I think it may be on YouTube,
Speaker 7: but there's this cave in England where they like have
Speaker 7: a memorial for it almost and it's and the thing
Speaker 7: about caves is in a lot of these occult groups
Speaker 7: they would go into cave for like you know, you're
Speaker 7: going into darkness and coming out reborn or whatever for
Speaker 7: all these rebirth rituals. But he did mention uh Ishtar
Speaker 7: as as well, which is related to Dionysus throughout different pantheons.
Speaker 7: So I don't know exactly about like the certain day
Speaker 7: the certain deity worship that was going on, but it's
Speaker 7: definitely they're just another like mythrus cult, you know, going
Speaker 7: going underground and then coming back out that you see
Speaker 7: that a lot in the ancient past.
Speaker 4: But uh, I mean you say is connected to Dionysus.
Speaker 4: Is that is that like etymology thing to where a
Speaker 4: lot of people think it's the same deity type deal,
Speaker 4: like just in different different.
Speaker 7: Well, yeah, Dionysus being related directly to nanar Sin, the
Speaker 7: moon god, and in the Sumerian myth the Ishtar being
Speaker 7: the daughter of that moon god.
Speaker 3: So I'm telling you right now, man, this connects to
Speaker 3: I think the beast reality aspect of the sexual magic
Speaker 3: that they conduct in certain rituals. You go, of course,
Speaker 3: back to the ex dossier, you know, and that's that's
Speaker 3: the first thing that I consider. But here's how he
Speaker 3: kind of like references this concept of the labyrinth and
Speaker 3: the minotaur and modern Babylon is basically, he starts by
Speaker 3: saying that to oblige a wealthy customer who by riot
Speaker 3: and excess had impaired his vitality to such an extent
Speaker 3: that nothing could minister to his jaded senses, but very
Speaker 3: young maidens, an eminently respectable lady undertook that whenever the
Speaker 3: girl was fourteen or fifteen years of age, she should
Speaker 3: be strapped down hand and foot to the four posts
Speaker 3: of the bedstead, so that all resistance saved that of
Speaker 3: unveiling screaming would be impossible. Before the strapping down was
Speaker 3: finally agreed upon, the lady of the house, a stalwart
Speaker 3: woman and experienced in the trade, had volunteered her services
Speaker 3: to hold the virgin down by force while her wealthy
Speaker 3: patron affected his purpose. That was too much even for him,
Speaker 3: and the alternative of fastening with straps padded on the
Speaker 3: underside was then agreed upon. Strapping down for violation used
Speaker 3: to be a common occurrence used to be a common
Speaker 3: occurrence in Half Moon Street and then Anna Rosenberg's brothel
Speaker 3: at Liverpool. Anything can be done for money if you
Speaker 3: only know where to take it.
Speaker 7: Last night Rosenberg dude right, nt to see it.
Speaker 4: But we're pointing that out. Yeah all, but uh yeah,
Speaker 4: I will hold on.
Speaker 7: I was gonna say, I got it, Glane Maxwell right exactly, Yeah, yeah, wow, Yeah,
Speaker 7: it's it's uh.
Speaker 3: I think these procurement methods are long standing. And as
Speaker 3: as he references this Labyrinth of Crete, this is where
Speaker 3: a lot of the mythological concepts and references stem from
Speaker 3: in regard to in his his four part series, but
Speaker 3: it's really the last part that kind of explains this
Speaker 3: this aspect, and then we can get into a little
Speaker 3: bit more of the bare bones. So Jewels you can
Speaker 3: kind of provide a little bit more of a reference,
Speaker 3: I think. But in regard to the the the just
Speaker 3: the belief system theologically, you know, and in many ways
Speaker 3: a cult just as far the the occult nature.
Speaker 1: Of the philosophy.
Speaker 3: But he's so, he says, uh Stead says, as in
Speaker 3: the Labyrinth of Crete, there was a monster known as
Speaker 3: the Minotaur who devoured the maidens who were cast into
Speaker 3: the mazes of that evil place. So in London there's
Speaker 3: at least one monster who may be said to be
Speaker 3: an absolute incarnation of brutal lust, the poor maligned brute
Speaker 3: and the Cretan labyrinth, but devoured his tale of seven
Speaker 3: maids and as many boys every ninth year here in London,
Speaker 3: moving about clad is respectably in broadcloth and fine linen,
Speaker 3: as any bishop, with no foul shape or semblance of
Speaker 3: brute beasts to mark him off from the rest of
Speaker 3: his fellows. Is doctor redacted, now retired from his profession
Speaker 3: and free to devote his fortune.
Speaker 4: I did find it a little prescient that it used
Speaker 4: the euphemism in fine linen as any bishop, especially when
Speaker 4: you follow these religion. Religious figures are all too common
Speaker 4: in these But go on.
Speaker 3: Right, exactly, man, And so it's so strange man. But
Speaker 3: doctor redacted, now retired from his profession and free to
Speaker 3: devote his fortune and his leisure to the ruin of maids.
Speaker 3: This is the gentleman whose quantum of versions from his
Speaker 3: procureus procuruses is three per fortnight, all girls who have
Speaker 3: not previously been seduced. But his devastating passion sinks into
Speaker 3: insignificance compared with that of mister Redacted, another wealthy man
Speaker 3: whose whole life is dedicated to the gratification of lust.
Speaker 3: During my investigations in the subterranean realm, I was constantly
Speaker 3: coming across his name. This procurus was getting girls for redacted.
Speaker 3: That woman was beating up maids for redacted. This girl
Speaker 3: was waiting for redacted. That house was a noted place
Speaker 3: of redacteds. I ran across his traces so constantly that
Speaker 3: I began to make inquiries in the upper world of
Speaker 3: this redoubtable personage. I soon obtained confirmation of the evidence
Speaker 3: I had gathered at first hand below the reality of
Speaker 3: the existence of this modern minotaur, this English Tiberius whose
Speaker 3: caprice is in London. It's so strange that that is
Speaker 3: the way that he introduces the entire very dramatic terms
Speaker 3: absolutely and and neil pagan in its nature as far
Speaker 3: as the occult kind of you know, connotations, And yeah.
Speaker 7: Brother, the minotaur goes back to the Assyrian man bull
Speaker 7: who was depicted with five feet wings and then like
Speaker 7: so it kind of changed over time. But uh, yeah,
Speaker 7: I mean it's a composite creature, so I mean it
Speaker 7: could have existed, you know, through some sort of weird
Speaker 7: like Frankenstein magic, I don't know, or like summoning it,
Speaker 7: maybe portals and whatnot. But it could just be looked
Speaker 7: at as being esoteric, you know, having a body of
Speaker 7: a man and then so you're like half beast half
Speaker 7: man because the Assyrian Mamble had wings, so it was
Speaker 7: like had the wings of a god. Uh, you know,
Speaker 7: head of a beast, body of a man.
Speaker 4: Well, you guys know, when it comes to like terms,
Speaker 4: I think they went into this a little bit in
Speaker 4: Chicken Hawk the book, but uh, and I believe this
Speaker 4: might have its origins in some like German type ops,
Speaker 4: you know, when it comes like werewolves like these are
Speaker 4: terms like these, like animalistic terms, especially ones that are
Speaker 4: like animals that are hybrids, like a minotaur or a werewolf.
Speaker 4: These do commonly come up in an in context when
Speaker 4: it comes to things of a carnal nature or awful
Speaker 4: things or or doing deprave things or things, So like
Speaker 4: a werewolf or a or a minotaur can easily be
Speaker 4: a metaphor for doing being being someone who gets overtaken
Speaker 4: by depraved acts.
Speaker 7: Essentially, so you're an animal that you're carnal nature, right,
Speaker 7: your your animalistic nature, because all all men have it,
Speaker 7: you know, everyone has it. It's just your point is
Speaker 7: to control.
Speaker 4: That, right.
Speaker 7: But it could also refer to the Tarist constellation, have
Speaker 7: some astro theological you know, uh, representation to it as well.
Speaker 3: But what do you know about this?
Speaker 4: This?
Speaker 3: This is this, this is crazy though, because this again
Speaker 3: it's it's all basically cultural context. You get different deities
Speaker 3: that represent similar entities, right, if not the same, if
Speaker 3: not the very same, which all kind of stem from
Speaker 3: like this ancient Babylonian mythology Mesopotamian. I can't quite, I
Speaker 3: can't quite you know, distinguish from myself yet. Yeah, but
Speaker 3: I'm interested to know because you look at this brother
Speaker 3: and what they introduce with this eighteenth century the health
Speaker 3: fire clubs, which were just a representation a term used
Speaker 3: to represent this, the rakes clubs at the time. So
Speaker 3: apparently this is so crazy to me, because of course
Speaker 3: Stead is the journalists who we've been referencing as far
Speaker 3: as his kind of his introduction to these clubs and
Speaker 3: this very much high society brothels that are being exploited
Speaker 3: on their behalf. And he says and again he's coming
Speaker 3: from this, you know, this, this sect of society, right,
Speaker 3: which is something that we're aliens in regard to understanding
Speaker 3: and conceptualizing their way of life, their lifestyle, right Like, this.
Speaker 4: Is why I consistently say we like you and your
Speaker 4: family are despised by.
Speaker 3: The ruling class. There's a reason my podcast is called
Speaker 3: the Underclass. You know, it truly is a reference to
Speaker 3: all of us who are not represented at any real level.
Speaker 3: You know, that's truly what it is. And but this specifically,
Speaker 3: he describes, of course himself as scholar intimately involved in
Speaker 3: the early stages of civilization planning for the British Commonwealth.
Speaker 3: Drew heavily upon mythological metaphors to infer a possible heritage
Speaker 3: or influence to this heinous culture of the aristocracy. The
Speaker 3: title of his investigation compared this culture to that of
Speaker 3: ancient babylon brother and throughout the body referenced heavily the
Speaker 3: Cretan myth of the minotaur. For now, basically regard these
Speaker 3: as mere illusion or metaphor, but keep in mind the following.
Speaker 3: A labyrinth somewhere within the city of Nassis on the
Speaker 3: island of Crete, a Minoan Cretan goddess called Potnia Potnia
Speaker 3: or Potnia of the Labyrinth, a bowl within that labyrinth
Speaker 3: or minotaur, to which fourteen youths were sacrificed annually or
Speaker 3: every nine years, depending on the source. A Babylonian goddess
Speaker 3: of the planet Venus named Ishtar, whose consort had once
Speaker 3: been a heavenly bull torn to pieces by Gilgamesh in
Speaker 3: the first ever epic poem of recorded history. It starts
Speaker 3: to get absolutely absurd, and then you get into also
Speaker 3: keep in mind, you know, these are really the three
Speaker 3: most like important points to kind of like stage this
Speaker 3: whole concept. Eighteenth century race clubs or health fire clubs
Speaker 3: adopted overly satanic rituals or practices in tacit worship, genuine
Speaker 3: or otherwise of the Greek and Roman forms of the
Speaker 3: goddess Venus in God Bacchus.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and as we were kind of getting at it
Speaker 4: before the think about the acts that they're doing and
Speaker 4: if they are getting into satanic or demonology or like
Speaker 4: anything to do with that, Like what are we talking about?
Speaker 4: What does this mean? What does it mean? Like if
Speaker 4: you were getting into crazy traumatic acts that like I
Speaker 4: don't know, are overtly over the top, like I don't know,
Speaker 4: you're getting into some like mind trauma, you know, fucking
Speaker 4: mania here.
Speaker 7: Sex magic.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's when.
Speaker 7: We look at in vocus spirit right right in.
Speaker 4: Focus, spirit created, created, separate consciousness, whatever, whatever you want
Speaker 4: to call it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, And child orgies were a common practice in
Speaker 3: regard to to these high society brothels, and there were
Speaker 3: individual organizations that were procuring these, you know, at least
Speaker 3: again it's it's kind of pick your fetish, honestly, even
Speaker 3: though a lot of this I think is very much
Speaker 3: within this occult framework of practicing this sex ritual magic
Speaker 3: which is neo pagan and and you know, in essence,
Speaker 3: and but again you have you think about like, for example,
Speaker 3: the the Delphi murders, like that was Nordic, you know,
Speaker 3: in but again, do they not have parallel entities and
Speaker 3: deities that you know perfectly represent the exact same notion philosophically,
Speaker 3: you know what I'm saying, Like ideologically they provide the
Speaker 3: exact same template. So what's the difference. It's just the
Speaker 3: name for the context, right, and the connotation in the
Speaker 3: geographical area or the time. At least that's what it
Speaker 3: seems like. But in reality you see, of course this
Speaker 3: tacit worship that I mentioned, genuine or otherwise, that involved
Speaker 3: the goddess Venus in god Bacchus. Nineteenth century London brothels
Speaker 3: held Venus themed child orgies and other such events for
Speaker 3: aristocratic clientele. William Stead compared the sexual vices of his
Speaker 3: late nineteenth century appears to the Minoan myth of the
Speaker 3: Minotaur and the customs of ancient Babylon, and it gets
Speaker 3: a little bit more into the Ionian antiquities from nineteen
Speaker 3: at least seventeen sixty six at least, which is very
Speaker 3: interesting because again we're getting back into kind of the
Speaker 3: ancient path, you know, this path that you can you
Speaker 3: can chart to modern day for this strange neopagan belief
Speaker 3: system that is being consistently at least resurfacing over time
Speaker 3: in direct correlation and connection to these insane, stidistic abuse networks.
Speaker 4: What the fuck is that?
Speaker 7: The I mean, the worship of Venus is the worship
Speaker 7: of Lucifer, right, because Lucifer.
Speaker 4: Is not a deity.
Speaker 7: When they use it in the Bible, they were referring
Speaker 7: to a certain king who had fallen from grace but
Speaker 7: it is the worship of you know, the morning star venus.
Speaker 7: Maybe over time it became some like type of like
Speaker 7: archetypal eggrigor or something maybe like if you worship something enough,
Speaker 7: it manifests, you know, perhaps, But yeah, man, it's just
Speaker 7: the same stuff rebranded all all these different cults. You know,
Speaker 7: they just have their own little that they use. Each
Speaker 7: one does and similar rituals.
Speaker 3: But you know, yeah, yeah, and we can we can
Speaker 3: spend all fucking night talking about Yeah, it's fascinating. And
Speaker 3: the last point that I really have to make is
Speaker 3: is basically that one, you know, consider the fact that,
Speaker 3: first of all, this is very strange because I didn't
Speaker 3: realize that this potnia this ancient you know, mistress lady.
Speaker 3: This is an ancient Greek word for mistress lady apparently,
Speaker 3: and and I also didn't realize that, you know, this
Speaker 3: has ties to apparently it's again she's referenced as the
Speaker 3: mistress lady, and so she's of course kind of considered
Speaker 3: to be this mistress goddess in in in essence, and
Speaker 3: apparently there's a version of her where it's the potnia thereon,
Speaker 3: and it to the lady of animals or a mistress
Speaker 3: of animals, and it's an again an ancient art from
Speaker 3: Mediterranean world and in the ancient Nearis. Apparently that draws
Speaker 3: this central human or human like female figure who grasps
Speaker 3: two animals, one to each side. But it seems to
Speaker 3: reference potentially reference, uh, the occult nature of beastiality and
Speaker 3: animal sacrifice, right, because again it draws into the idea
Speaker 3: that first of all, Platna in the Labyrinth was the
Speaker 3: procuress for the minotaur, and so she's procuring, essentially procuring
Speaker 3: these miners, right, these these young females and virgins, and
Speaker 3: also these nine young males which consider you know, what
Speaker 3: was it in the terms of the Neo templar renaissance
Speaker 3: of the Nine Unknown? It's like, what is going on again?
Speaker 3: Jewels would like this this you know this numerology nine.
Speaker 7: Brother, you see the nine in every single culture, and
Speaker 7: I mean there's that link to the order of nine
Speaker 7: angles angles angels. I know Todd and Raven have been
Speaker 7: talking about the nine. I think they did an episode
Speaker 7: recently this past week. So that's something to look at, man,
Speaker 7: something I'm I'm gonna have to do a deep dive into.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I bookmark this thing because I want to look
Speaker 4: at this later. This is a very interesting article like these,
Speaker 4: isn't it crazy? There's a lot to this, you know,
Speaker 4: because I mean this is like the earliest recorded poem
Speaker 4: they're talking about, So this is even like kind of
Speaker 4: it's like, this almost seems like it's kind of in
Speaker 4: that period of time between like Samerian and Greek. It's like,
Speaker 4: so it is kind of that in between. That's why
Speaker 4: we're dealing with like Ishtar here.
Speaker 7: Yeah, Abalon a Syria, all that stuff.
Speaker 3: Again it's talking about of course, you know, we referenced
Speaker 3: earlier to this Feast of Venus, which was apparently orchestrated
Speaker 3: by Charlotte Hayes, who was organizing an annual child orgy
Speaker 3: for the British elites that she referenced to as the
Speaker 3: Feast of Venus. And and it's so crazy because another
Speaker 3: person named Elizabeth Falklan, which again you consider the confessions
Speaker 3: of a DC madam deverging Palfrey, they do utilize a
Speaker 3: lot of females to kind of be the madams of
Speaker 3: certain procuras networks, you know, I would imagine and the
Speaker 3: same for like the ex dossier what was it X
Speaker 3: one it was her grandma that had recruited her, essentially
Speaker 3: well recruited her, had forced her into that lifestyle. And
Speaker 3: so yeah, it's apparently this Elizabeth Falkland operated an exclusive
Speaker 3: high society brothel called the Temple of Mysteries, which specialized,
Speaker 3: of course in sadism. And the last real point is
Speaker 3: just that there was this de Letani Society which had
Speaker 3: particular interest in the esoteric aspects of this Greek mystery cult,
Speaker 3: which were the first secret societies of class school and
Speaker 3: therefore Western civilization, and in seventeen sixty six sponsored research
Speaker 3: on the subject, including an expedition, and as a result,
Speaker 3: the society published the first of a five volume set
Speaker 3: called Ionian Antiquities in seventeen sixty nine that detailed, among
Speaker 3: other ruins, the temple of Bacchus and Tails.
Speaker 4: Which, by the way, Bacchus is a opener. Mind they're
Speaker 4: about to actually say it. I jumped the guy. I
Speaker 4: was telling you something. But literally, it's a prechrestor for Dionysus.
Speaker 1: Yea, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 4: Fat which, like I find it interesting because they're talking
Speaker 4: about worshiping Venus and Bacchus, which you know, Venus and Dionysus,
Speaker 4: So the god of partying essentially in the god a
Speaker 4: god of wine, and then the god of like fertility,
Speaker 4: and you know, obviously then you have the god of love,
Speaker 4: so you have like a love and a party obviously,
Speaker 4: and these kind of have like dark mirrors to them
Speaker 4: and Luss so like them. You think about these two
Speaker 4: together and kind of what that says, you know, the
Speaker 4: love and partying.
Speaker 1: And then the list.
Speaker 3: To child orgies, Yeah, yeah, which was Bacchus was the
Speaker 3: Roman equivalent, as you were saying, Jose of the Greek
Speaker 3: god Dionysus, whose cult was founded, according to myth, by
Speaker 3: the Greek poet prophet Orpheus, who, according to the Roman
Speaker 3: poet historian Ovid, was credited with being the first ever pediast.
Speaker 3: It is after Orpheus the orphic mysteries are named. The
Speaker 3: cult of Dionysus perpetuated itself into the Roman era under
Speaker 3: the god Bacchus and festival Bacchanalia. So when we speak
Speaker 3: of Bacchus and when we speak of Dionysus, the two
Speaker 3: are mostly synonymous. And when we speak of Dionysia or
Speaker 3: of Bacchanalia, we speak at least in part of child orgies.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and didn't they say Dionysus earlier in this article
Speaker 4: they were talking about Dionysus is in many times takes
Speaker 4: the form of a bull. I think it's supposed to
Speaker 4: be like the consort of like Ishtar. So like I
Speaker 4: think I think that what they're implying is almost as
Speaker 4: if this like Venus or Venus, Bacchus, Venus Dionysus do
Speaker 4: out like kind of a companionship, kind of goes back
Speaker 4: to all the way to Ishtar and like a bull
Speaker 4: of stories that they're implying. So in the bull and
Speaker 4: bull bull would obviously have a lot to do with
Speaker 4: like Moloch, which the same time time takes the form
Speaker 4: of a bull to sacrifice.
Speaker 7: Yeah, like in Leo or l being the bull of
Speaker 7: heaven and stuff. Absolutely, man, Yeah, it has to do.
Speaker 7: Marduke was the solar calf back when his name uh well,
Speaker 7: when that deity was worshiped as ah Asar lou He
Speaker 7: or m damn. Sure it's one of them, one of
Speaker 7: the many.
Speaker 3: Absolutely, brother, I know. And and uh when you realize
Speaker 3: which by the way, I didn't notice this until I
Speaker 3: went through this this series of articles.
Speaker 4: But the cult of Bacchus.
Speaker 3: Dionysus was apparently even outlawed by the Roman Senate, which
Speaker 3: is hilarious to me and makes a lot of sense,
Speaker 3: But according to them this gets far more sinister. And
Speaker 3: Dionysus was worshiped by a number of different groups, but
Speaker 3: among the followers of Orpheus, a sect called Mainids, this
Speaker 3: elusive god was worshiped an idol of a goat or bull.
Speaker 3: Worship of Dionysus in these two forms, that of a
Speaker 3: goat or bull at times involved the ritual sacrifice and
Speaker 3: cannibalism of children, in which instances an animal was substituted
Speaker 3: for child, it remains unclear. According to myth Orpheus was
Speaker 3: eventually killed by these Manids. They tore him to pieces
Speaker 3: during possession orgy, drank his blood, then ate his flesh.
Speaker 1: That straight.
Speaker 3: And of death cult, that is literally what they were doing.
Speaker 7: Man amar Utu was the solar calf name. But you
Speaker 7: mentioned h uh, let me see cannibalism, right, And when
Speaker 7: you think of the bull, I think, jose you it's
Speaker 7: mostly related to ball. Molock, as we've seen, is represented
Speaker 7: by an owl which is really just Minerva. But can
Speaker 7: of ball, that name comes from the Canonite worship of
Speaker 7: ball can of Ball right as the etymology of it.
Speaker 1: So that is very interesting.
Speaker 4: I do find it particularly interesting they're referred to this
Speaker 4: as a possession orgy though, because like, oh yeah, what
Speaker 4: does that imply? Like, I obviously they're killing the victim,
Speaker 4: but like to even be part of a group that
Speaker 4: perpetrates such an act, does that due to you?
Speaker 11: Well?
Speaker 4: Are you allowing the animal side to take over? Are
Speaker 4: you allowing the werewolf minotaur like.
Speaker 7: To enter you basically and allow that carnal that carnal
Speaker 7: nature to come out.
Speaker 4: M dude.
Speaker 3: By the way, energy found this.
Speaker 7: Look at the bull, Yeah, stepping on the head of
Speaker 7: the boys.
Speaker 4: Ye kinds.
Speaker 3: I mean that was the artifact that game killing bull
Speaker 3: mm hmm right, which is just so nuts. And then
Speaker 3: artifact of mythrist killing bull. Statue of Liberty top left corner.
Speaker 4: Yeah, holy ship, that is the statue of Liberty.
Speaker 3: Bro It could very easily be there, yes, wow.
Speaker 4: And then the again the the what was that name
Speaker 4: of the portrait of Lucifer that that has.
Speaker 3: The the apple and the chain ship. I can't remember
Speaker 3: now you're talking. We talked about it just the other day. Yeah,
Speaker 3: it's so crazy to me. I mean, this is not coincidental, man,
Speaker 3: not at all. And the minotaur myth as a metaphor
Speaker 3: is not pageantry as they say in this article as well.
Speaker 3: It's it's so clearly you know, these are violent sex
Speaker 3: customs of his contemporaries that he's that he's describing of course.
Speaker 4: So yeah, well, I think we've kind of covered this
Speaker 4: pretty thoroughly. Is there anything in in this that you
Speaker 4: wanted to cover, Austin? But otherwise, bust you know, anytime
Speaker 4: we want. So it's it's all good.
Speaker 3: It would take a lot more time, I would think,
Speaker 3: But I think, uls where can people find you?
Speaker 7: Bud uh, Guys, I'm on x at, Gray Pill Pod, Instagram,
Speaker 7: Great Pulled, Underscore Podcast, Rumble YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Patreon,
Speaker 7: dot com, Slash, Great Pill Podcast. I'm going on. My
Speaker 7: family thinks I'm crazy this Sunday, so well yeah, yeah, man,
Speaker 7: it's gonna be fun. Got got a lot of good
Speaker 7: stuff coming.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Also, you go to Paranoid American dot com and you
Speaker 7: can put in promo code gray Pilled. That's g r
Speaker 7: E Y P I l l E D, not Great Pill,
Speaker 7: Great Pilled for ten percent off purchase. And uh yeah,
Speaker 7: thank y'all for coming and hanging out guys.
Speaker 4: Hell yeah awesome. Where can people find you?
Speaker 3: Bud Man, You guys know the Underclass podcast basically everywhere
Speaker 3: and Patreon dot com slash the Underclass Podcast best place
Speaker 3: to support me for sure, guys. And and I just
Speaker 3: put out episode seven of whatever this is. Brad couldn't
Speaker 3: make it, so it's just basically me and Sam talking
Speaker 3: for about an hour. But it was a lot of fun.
Speaker 3: We just bullshit it, had had a good time. And
Speaker 3: so check that out. And and like I said, I'm
Speaker 3: gonna be dedicating the next couple of days to to
Speaker 3: really kind of taking that deep dive plunge and coming
Speaker 3: out on the other end hopefully It always seems to
Speaker 3: kind of inevitable, inevitably lead to a few more weeks
Speaker 3: of of callbacks, right if not more than that, where
Speaker 3: I can remember and remind myself and and everyone else
Speaker 3: of like these extraordinary overlaps that consistently arise in regards
Speaker 3: to these networks that I once thop we're unaffiliated with
Speaker 3: each other, which is obviously not the case at this moment.
Speaker 3: So anyway, I love you guys, and Austin and Sam
Speaker 3: comparing those sizes. Yeah, exactly right, child bastard, That's exactly
Speaker 3: what we're doing.
Speaker 4: Thanks, yeah, but I love you guys. But if you
Speaker 4: guys want to support what I'm doing over here, and
Speaker 4: if you don't want to chip in a buck, you
Speaker 4: can like, share, subscribe, comment, leave a five star review
Speaker 4: on iTunes or Spotify. Obviously this goes for me, Austin
Speaker 4: and for Jules's work. You know that. That's all, you know,
Speaker 4: suggestions for all of that. If you want to get
Speaker 4: a product for your support, you can go over to
Speaker 4: a doshaveco dot com. You can get a safety raiser,
Speaker 4: a single blade safety raiser there. This is a much
Speaker 4: better deal than those multi blades that most people shave with.
Speaker 4: It's seventy five bucks the entire year. You're gonna save
Speaker 4: money off on the first year and even then after
Speaker 4: that you're gonna save more because it's a blades. After
Speaker 4: that that it's a single blade. It's a much smoother shave.
Speaker 4: It's much better for your skin. So listen to doshavecode
Speaker 4: dot com. It's you know, like I said, cheaper, better
Speaker 4: for your skin, better shave. Then, on top of all
Speaker 4: of that you get ten percent off if you use
Speaker 4: jose at checkout. Let them know, I sencha. This is
Speaker 4: a company that you know kind of you know, generally speaking,
Speaker 4: probably comports your values. This is a COVID mandate refusing company.
Speaker 4: But if you do want to support the show, kind
Speaker 4: of a last but not least like the best way
Speaker 4: cash is king Baby, I get it. If you guys
Speaker 4: can't afford it, that's one thing. But if you can,
Speaker 4: if you've got at least two bucks to chip in,
Speaker 4: that'll unlock most of the benefits. The two dollars level
Speaker 4: gets you the early access to episodes. I'm shooting for
Speaker 4: doing two week these days, I'm supposed to I'm gonna
Speaker 4: have I'm supposed to have somebody coming on Sunday, a
Speaker 4: big guest, so keep an eye out for that. And
Speaker 4: then I also have one thread, so I'm doing two
Speaker 4: this week, but that's the goals going forward to having
Speaker 4: four behind the paywall two a week, so that way
Speaker 4: is getting your value out. That also add free RSS
Speaker 4: feed there and then on top of all of that
Speaker 4: you can get you can get the be a video
Speaker 4: chat do video chat on this show. So that goes
Speaker 4: for me and Austin, both of us send that out.
Speaker 4: That's our lowest level. You can be a talking head
Speaker 4: on today's show, which one of you guys would use that. Guys,
Speaker 4: you should totally take advantage of that. It'd be good
Speaker 4: for you guys to pop on like that. Although I
Speaker 4: do see you guys are using it to like pop
Speaker 4: in the chat. We actually have two behind it, behind
Speaker 4: the pay behind the chat right now hanging out. They'll
Speaker 4: probably shoot the shit with after that. So even if
Speaker 4: you don't want to come on the show, I guess
Speaker 4: it's another way to watch it. Give you a different experience,
Speaker 4: kind of hanging out with the boys while we're doing it.
Speaker 4: So that's kind of fun. But with that also the
Speaker 4: highest level real quick shouting them out. That's my sponsors,
Speaker 4: my patron sponsors, that's my coast. I'm targeting at Targing Toad,
Speaker 4: also at Aggregate D's at zo v R A c
Speaker 4: K at Underscoring Physio, Tim Tuttle at joy on Cleebold
Speaker 4: will Bell which is a delicious blueberry Rabbini wine. Then
Speaker 4: Big Fans Show Torn Made, then at IMW A R
Speaker 4: D Lover And with that, guys, we're gonna go ahead
Speaker 4: and get out of here. Also, yeah, follow me on
Speaker 4: Twitter at tagging Jose that's the best place to tag
Speaker 4: me if there's stuff you want me to cover on
Speaker 4: the Morning Show. And last but not Lisa, you with
Speaker 4: the Morning Show show up tomorrow ten am Eastern, I
Speaker 4: will be going live, so you know, pop in hang out.
Speaker 4: Austin won't be there. We'll probably see him three weeks
Speaker 4: from now, once he finally knocks out an episode. Uh,
Speaker 4: but with that, guys, we're out of here. Love y'all,
Speaker 4: Bye buddy. What's up?
Speaker 7: Tyler Yankee is on horseshoes and hand grenades right now,
Speaker 7: your producer, so, oh, figured you may want to tell
Speaker 7: folks to go over there.
Speaker 4: And yeah, go over there, people, go check the horseshoes
Speaker 4: and hand grenades, go check out the homie Tyler Yankee.
Speaker 4: But all right, we're getting out of here. You guys,
Speaker 4: go on over there. We're out. Bye bye here, go
Speaker 4: to bed.