Speaker 1: We tend to think we have a pretty solid grasp
on how the world works. You know, we have our history,
our science, the laws of physics. It's all very neat,
very tidy.
Speaker 2: It's a comfortable story for sure.
Speaker 1: Right, But every once in a while, a figure just
sort of steps out of the shadows, and often those
shadows are cast by some pretty serious government buildings, and.
Speaker 2: That person's story just completely shatters that neat, tidy reality
we've built.
Speaker 1: For ourselves exactly. And the man we're doing a deep
dive on today, Ingo Swan, might just be the most
disruptive figure of.
Speaker 2: Them all, without a doubt. I mean, we're talking about
the person widely seen as the father of remote viewing.
Speaker 1: And his CV is well, it's not normal. He spent
nearly two decades, nineteen years working directly with the US
intelligence community.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and not just anyone. We're talking the CIA, THEDIA,
the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon, the absolute core of
the deep state during the Cold War.
Speaker 1: And the reason they hired him, this is the kicker.
It wasn't because he was a great spot or could
crack codes.
Speaker 2: Nope, they hired him because he could do things that well,
the physics of the nineteen seventies said were completely and
utterly impossible.
Speaker 1: He was brought into the Stanford Research Institute SRORI, which is,
you know, it's one of the most elite think tanks on.
Speaker 2: The planet, right, and his job basically was to prove
the unimaginable was real and then of course, to weaponize it.
Speaker 1: What's so wild to me is how quickly he earned
respect even from these really hardened skeptical scientists and intelligence officers. Oh.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, there's this one story, this quote from one of
his colleagues at SRI. It just sets the stage perfectly.
Speaker 1: Hey, what is it.
Speaker 2: He's introducing Swan to a room full of these, you know,
very serious academics, and he stands up and says, and
this is a direct quote, it's a great honor to
be here and introduce Ingo Swan, a man who truly
resides outside of space and time.
Speaker 1: Ooh, a man who resides outside of space and time. Yeah,
that's not a metaphor, that's describing a state of being,
like he wasn't just visiting, he lived there.
Speaker 2: Exactly tells you everything about the kind of person we're
talking about. And you know, our mission here isn't just
to tell some cool Cold War spy stories.
Speaker 1: Not at all. We're here to unpack the very specific
and i'd say deeply unsettling warning that Swan left for
all of us. In his later years.
Speaker 2: He really shifted his focus, didn't he. After his government
work was done classified, he turned his attention to you,
to the listener.
Speaker 1: He left behind this incredibly detailed explanation for why he
believed that basically every single one of us is and
I'm quoting him here walking around blind, deaf and dumb
to the real reality.
Speaker 2: And for this deep dive, we're pulling from the transcripts
of those final lectures, specifically from a video titled the
CIA Psychic w Broke Reality, the classified warning they tried
to erase on the channel beyond the veil.
Speaker 1: And Swan he had such a personality. He promised his
audience he was going to give them enough information to
chokohors and twenty seven camels.
Speaker 2: He did not mince words, not at all.
Speaker 1: And so we're ready to take on that data dump
to kind of distill it down and listen to his
call to action, which was to break the programming.
Speaker 2: And that's where this gets really personal, I think, because
the most dangerous idea he put forward wasn't about spying
on the Soviets. It was about us.
Speaker 1: What was it?
Speaker 2: It was the idea that this superpower he had what
we call remote viewing or psychic ability. It's not a fluke,
it's not some rare gift for a chosen few.
Speaker 1: So what is it?
Speaker 2: Then? He called it a species phenomenon.
Speaker 1: A species phenomenon like walking on two legs.
Speaker 2: Precisely, a capability that is inherent in the DNA of
every single human being. It's our birthright.
Speaker 1: Okay, that changes everything because if that's true, if it's
like having opposable thumbs, then the question isn't how do
I get this power?
Speaker 2: The question becomes if it's ours already, why can't we
use it? Why have we lost it?
Speaker 1: And that right there leads us directly into Swan's theory
of the system, the program designed to keep us from
our own potential.
Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, let's get into it, the system of mine programming.
Swan didn't dance around this. He stood up in front
of people and asked this, this really terrifyingly direct question,
which was are your minds programmed?
Speaker 1: And he didn't even wait for an answer. Did. He
He just used himself as the first example right away.
Speaker 2: He said, absolutely, my mind was programmed. He said, I
believed everything when I was a kid that was put
into it. He saw this not as just, you know,
a part of growing up. He saw it as a
deliberate mechanism of control, a.
Speaker 1: Way to actively reduce our capacity as human beings.
Speaker 2: He called the process a systematic suppression. He had a
specific name for it, the dampener, the dampener, and he said,
this dampener gets applied the second we're born, through society,
through our schools, through all of our cultural norms. Its
only job is to shut down our own innate hardware.
Speaker 1: And what's the message of that programming? Why shut it down?
Speaker 2: The message is basically driven by fear. He quotes the
internal logic of the system. Don't use these special things.
You might become a telepath and find out everybody's secret. So,
you know, close that down.
Speaker 1: If you stop and think about that, the implications are
just they're huge.
Speaker 2: It's massive. The programming exists, he argued, because a world
without secrets is completely incompatible with how power works today.
Speaker 1: Just imagine that for a second, a world where telepathy
or even just strong intuition was widespread, it would it
would instantly break everything.
Speaker 2: Politics would be impossible. A politician couldn't stand up and
lie because people would just feel it.
Speaker 1: Corporate secrets would vanish. You couldn't plot a hostile takeover
if your competition could just you know, view your boardroom.
Speaker 2: Even personal relationships would be transformed. You couldn't lie to
your spouse. So, as Swan put it, a world like that,
a world without lies, is a dangerous world for the
people in charge.
Speaker 1: So the suppression the dampener. It's an act of self
preservation for the status quo. It's an intellectual lockdown to
keep the population manageable.
Speaker 2: And Swan was pretty blunt about where he saw this happening.
He called this suppression a uniquely Western.
Speaker 1: Failure, meaning their cultures don't do this exactly.
Speaker 2: He contrasted our society, which actively tries to dampen these abilities,
with other cultures that actually nurture them, They integrate them
into their daily lives.
Speaker 1: So a is you talking about specifically?
Speaker 2: He mentioned the Shamans of the Russian Steps, the Sages
of Tibet, and the Aborigines of Australia.
Speaker 1: So for them, this isn't some party trick. It's a
fundamental skill.
Speaker 2: It's essential. It's for healing, for finding food, for governance,
for survival. He gave this really vivid example of the
Australian Aborigines who aren't burdened by our Western skepticism.
Speaker 1: What did he say they do?
Speaker 2: He said, they sit around their fires, time space tripping,
going everywhere.
Speaker 1: Wow, just practicing honing the skill, while our entire culture
is designed to make you believe that skill doesn't even exist.
Speaker 2: And the analogy he used for this is I think
the most powerful image from the entire source material. It
just perfectly captures the Western approach.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's hear it.
Speaker 2: He said that Western culture takes a ferrari, removes the engine,
cuts the brake lines, and then tells everyone it's a bicycle.
Speaker 1: That is brutal. Yeh, but it makes so much sense.
We have this high performance biological machine that can communicate
across space and time.
Speaker 2: And we actively sabotage it, We cripple it, reduce it
to its most basic five sense function, and then wonder
why we feel so limited.
Speaker 1: And the programming is so deep that even when we
do test something like remote viewing, we judge it by
the wrong standards completely.
Speaker 2: We only care about the externalized evidence.
Speaker 1: Did you get the target right? Did you guess the
number in the envelope. It's all about that one little
piece of data exactly.
Speaker 2: We completely ignore the process itself. We ignore the quote
amazing extensive awarenesses of our subtle sensing systems that happen
along the way.
Speaker 1: The conscious mind just wants that that simple three D
proof of something that's happening in a dimension that's been
told doesn't exist.
Speaker 2: Right, It's all about fitting it into that five cents bouquet,
as he called it. If you can't see it, hear it,
or touch it, then it's just it's a hallucination or
lucky get it's just noise. And that's where his final
analogy for this part comes in. He said, we are
judging a fish by its ability to climb a tree,
because we've been programmed to believe the ocean doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: The ocean being this this whole other reality of information
that we're swimming in.
Speaker 2: This massive field of energetic modulated information that we are
constantly in, and we ignore it because the dampeter told
us it wasn't real. Yeah, but swan he knew better.
He had the classified government data to prove it.
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's get into that. Let's talk about the Ferrari.
If we strip away the programming, what is this biological
machine of ours actually capable of? Because Swan wasn't just
talking philosophy.
Speaker 2: No, not at all. He was all about what he
called hard science electrochemical, physiology, neurobiology. Yeah, he was trying
to map the unseen hardware with physical concepts.
Speaker 1: Which brings us right to the biology of it, all
the nuts and bolts of the machine.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. So this brings us to section three, the untapped
biological machine. And the first thing Swan does is just
completely tear down the model of perception we all learn
in kindergarten, the five sensus. He called them the five cents.
Speaker 1: Bouquet, which sounds so nice, it.
Speaker 2: Does, And then he immediately called the entire concept garbage.
Speaker 1: You can almost hear the frustration and the transcripts, can't you.
He's just so angry that this simple model is still
being taught because.
Speaker 2: It was the main weapon used against him. Skeptics would say, well,
that doesn't fit into the five senses, so it can't
be real. They were confusing the map with the territory.
Speaker 1: But he had the science to back it up. He
had the receipts, so to speak.
Speaker 2: He did, and this is where it gets really interesting.
He cited a specific, dense academic text from nineteen eighty
four called Deciphering.
Speaker 1: The Census, and he said he wished he'd had this
book back in the seventies at Srori.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because it would have given them the scientific framework
for what they were experiencing in the lab. It would
have provided the biological proof.
Speaker 1: So what was the big bombshell from that research?
Speaker 2: The researchers, using empirical data, had identified not five, but
a minimum of seven seventeen sensing systems operating in the
human body seventeen seventeen, which means, as Swan pointed out,
we are consciously ignoring twelve full channels of reality every
second of every day.
Speaker 1: That's that's staggering.
Speaker 2: He was trying to make people understand. He'd say, you're
a walking receptor machine of millions and millions of receptors.
He wanted to take cy out of the realm of
ghosts and into the world of biology. This is hardware.
Speaker 1: So what are some of these extra twelve senses. What
kind of receptors are we talking about?
Speaker 2: Some are things we kind of know about but don't
label as a sense, like propriate reception, your sense of
where your body is in space or not suception, which
is your specific pain receptors. But he went way beyond that.
Speaker 1: Of the more subtle systems.
Speaker 2: Yes, he highlighted two that are key to understanding this. First,
he mentioned skin receptors that detect the balance and imbalance
of what is external to the body, so not just hot.
Speaker 1: Or cold, but the overall vibe of a room exactly.
Speaker 2: It's that feeling you get when you walk into a
house after an argument. Your eyes don't see anything, your
ears don't hear anything, but your skin, your entire sensory
system knows something is off here.
Speaker 1: Okay, And what was the second one?
Speaker 2: This is the one that really powers the ferrari. He
talked about neurological receptors specifically designed for interpreting modulated electronic information.
Speaker 1: So our nervous system is basically an antenna.
Speaker 2: That's the word he used. He said, you are biologically speaking,
literally a walking antenna.
Speaker 1: Constantly picking up on electromagnetic fields, radio waves, maybe even
thought energy things we can't measure.
Speaker 2: Yet, all of it. That ability to sense someone's true
intention or that a place feels wrong, that's not magic.
It's your receptors picking up on modulated electronic data that
your conscious mind has been programmed to ignore.
Speaker 1: Seventeen senses is already a lot to wrap your head around.
But the math he brought in about data processing, that's
what makes the blind and dumb comment really land.
Speaker 2: This is where it gets terrifying. He cited another book,
The User Illusion, which dives into the gap between all
the data our senses taken and what our conscious mind
actually becomes aware of.
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's break down the numbers.
Speaker 2: The sensory systems, all seventeen of them, with their millions
of receptors, they are sending a constant data stream to
your brain. And that stream is it's huge, eleven million
bits of information every single second, every second. Eleven million bits.
That's the ocean, that's the visual data, the sounds, the
ambient electromagnetism, the gut feelings, all of it a high
definition feed of reality.
Speaker 1: So if eleven million bits are coming in, how much
of that do we actually perceive? How much makes it
to our conscious awareness.
Speaker 2: This is the devastating number. The part of you that thinks,
the part you identify as me, your conscious mind process
is only sixteen sixteen of those eleven million.
Speaker 1: Bits, sixteen out of eleven million, sixteen.
Speaker 2: It's not a bottleneck, it's a near total blackout.
Speaker 1: My god, the ratio there is. I can't even do
that math in my head. It's insane.
Speaker 2: It's about six hundred and eighty seven thy five hundred
to one. We are, just as he said, effectively blind.
We're looking at a single pixel on a screen that's
projecting a full Imax movie.
Speaker 1: This is also kind of hopeful, isn't it in a
terrifying way.
Speaker 2: That's the flip side. It means all the cool stuff,
the remote viewing, the intuition, the telepathy, it's already happening.
It's happening in the ten million, nine hundred and ninety nine,
nine hundred and eighty four bits that your conscious mind
is filtering out.
Speaker 1: So when you get a gut feeling, that's not a hunch.
Speaker 2: That's your vast parallel processing supercomputer trying to shove life
saving data through a tiny sixteen bit keyhole.
Speaker 1: Swanset is actionable data though we should follow it.
Speaker 2: Because it's the only clue the conscious mind gets that
there's a bigger picture. The superpower isn't something you have
to build, it's something you have to stop ignoring. Your
biology is doing the work constantly. Your conscious mind is
just the skeptic in the room saying, nah, that can't
be real.
Speaker 1: Okay, So we have this antenna system, these seventeen streaming
in millions of bits of data. But where where is
the central processor for all this? Where is the hardware
that connects us to the cosmos.
Speaker 2: Swan had a very specific answer for that. He zeroed
in on one tiny piece of biological hardware, the pennial gland,
the peneal gland. And yes, it's often linked to the
mystical third eye, but Swan wasn't interested in that. He
treated it like a piece of quantifiable biological machinery.
Speaker 1: He grounded it in biology. It's this tiny piece sized
thing right in the geometric center of.
Speaker 2: Your head right and his claims about what it can
do they basically rewrite the book on human senses.
Speaker 1: His central claim was what that it can see everything.
Speaker 2: That was his phrase, it can see everything, And he
did not mean that as a metaphor. He claimed it
contains receptors that act as non visual photoreceptors.
Speaker 1: Meaning they pick up on light and image data that
doesn't come to the eyes.
Speaker 2: He essentially described it as a form of biological X
ray vision.
Speaker 1: But not like in the comic book Seeing through a Wall.
Speaker 2: Far beyond that, he said, it sees through time and
it sees through geology. This is the piece of rware
that literally wires your body into the planet itself.
Speaker 1: This is where we go from being a person on
the Earth to being.
Speaker 2: A part of the Earth exactly. He got really specific
about its capabilities. He said, it detects solar and lunarithms,
solar flares and sunspots.
Speaker 1: Stop for a second. The implications of that are just staggering.
A tiny gland in the middle of your skull is
physically detecting a massive solar explosion ninety three million miles away.
Speaker 2: It's doing it in real time.
Speaker 1: So our biology is hardwired into the solar system. We're
an instrument of the cosmos.
Speaker 2: And this gives a plausible scientific reason for all those
studies that link solar activity to human behavior, to moods,
to stock market crashes.
Speaker 1: Right if we're an antenna for solar flares. Of course,
that energy is going to affect our system, whether our
sixteenquit consciousness notices it or not.
Speaker 2: And then it gets even wilder. This is the hardware
for prophecy. Swan claimed the pineal gland senses forthcoming tidal.
Speaker 1: Forces, forthcoming as in future.
Speaker 2: Events, future events, forthcoming storms, and even forthcoming earthquakes. He
said his own ability to sense when an earthquake was
coming wasn't a psychic gift, it was his pineal gland
doing its job.
Speaker 1: He called that realization a bolt out of the blue.
Speaker 2: It was because it completely reframed the human being. You're
not just an observer. You are a planetary instrument. You
are literally wired into the tectonic place.
Speaker 1: Of the Earth, and that potential to be an early
warning system is there, but the mind program just filters
it out. It dismisses it as anxiety or coincidence.
Speaker 2: And if the hardware in your head can talk to
the sun and predict earthquakes, it can definitely influence the
world right in front of you, which is exactly what
his early experiments proved, long before the CIA ever came knocking.
Speaker 1: Right, let's go there, This is before Sriri. Swan is
still a skeptic himself, an artist in New York City,
and he walks into a lab that just turns his
entire world upside down.
Speaker 2: The lab of Cleave Baxter, famous for hooking up plants
to polygraph.
Speaker 1: Machines light detectors for plants.
Speaker 2: Basically, yeah, Baxter was showing that plants had a high
degree of consciousness, that they could react to human thought
and intention. Swan walked in thinking it was all a bit,
you know, a bit out there, very out there. He
saw the setup and asked Baxter, okay, so who's going
to affect the plant? And Baxter just said, you are.
Speaker 1: And the instructions were so simple but so brilliant because
there was no physical contact none.
Speaker 2: He just had to sit there and think about burning
one of the plants leaves, visualize a match, visualize the flame,
and the result instantaneous. The polygraph needle went off the scale,
a huge measurable violent reaction for the plant to the
mere thought of harm.
Speaker 1: Which is startling proof right there that consciousness is an
external field. It's a signal that affects the environment.
Speaker 2: But here's the really amazing part, the detail that shows
the plant's high grade consciousness. Swan realized it wasn't just
reacting to any thought.
Speaker 1: What do you mean?
Speaker 2: The plant could tell if he is bluffing, he said.
If the plant figures out that you don't mean it,
then it doesn't respond anymore.
Speaker 1: So it's reading intent, the quality and the conviction of
the thought. That's an incredible level of awareness for a plant.
Speaker 2: But Baxter wanted to push it further to prove this
wasn't just some weird biological feedback loop, right, He had.
Speaker 1: To take biology out of the equation exactly.
Speaker 2: So he challenged Swan to influence non biological targets, bits
of metals and gases sealed inside small canisters.
Speaker 1: This is moving from biology to pure physics, pure physics.
Speaker 2: The setup was simple metal and a canister hooked to
an electric potential detector. Normally, it just puts out a steady,
predictable sinwaight.
Speaker 1: Until an external force cts on it.
Speaker 2: Right, and Swan's focused thought, his consciousness was that force.
The sinway shifted. He measurably changed the electrical potential of
a sealed piece of metal with his mind.
Speaker 1: That's the smoking gun. It proves consciousness isn't just in
your head. It's a physical force that can alter the
material world.
Speaker 2: And that became the foundation for everything he did after
the core concept consciousness is a field, a signal. The
air between us, he said, is thick with thought.
Speaker 1: And our bodies, our seventeen senses, are constantly decoding that field,
even if our sixteen bit mind is totally oblivious.
Speaker 2: Yeah, he talked about the other signals. We're always sending
out pheromones or these fleeting sex vibes that last less
than half a second. The conscious mind misses them.
Speaker 1: Completely, but our biology tracks them perfectly. That eleven million
bit processor misses nothing.
Speaker 2: We're all just swimming in this sea of information, constantly
broadcasting our true intentions to every living thing around us.
Speaker 1: And the ultimate tragedy of the mind program, the ultimate irony,
is that we're the only ones who can't read the signal.
Speaker 2: We are, as he put it, the only ones in
the room who don't know what's happening. And that's why
he was so desperate for people to wake up. He
had the proof, and he paid a heavy price for it.
Speaker 1: So once he'd proven he could do this influence read signals,
the government took notice, and this is where his life
changed forever.
Speaker 2: And not for the better. He became an asset, an instrument,
and it began this chapter of his life that he
looked back on with just intense bitterness.
Speaker 1: He called his nineteen years in the labs a prison
of his own making. He said, it wrecked my life.
Speaker 2: He stopped being a person. He became, in his own words,
a biological instrument for the government. It wasn't Ingo Swan anymore.
He was a tool and.
Speaker 1: The work was brutal. It wasn't just a few tests
here and there. He talked about working with a doctor
Gertrude Schmidler.
Speaker 2: And the numbers are just insane. Over two hundred thousand
trials in a.
Speaker 1: Single year, two hundred thousand. Can you imagine the mental exhaustion,
constantly having to force your consciousness out of your body,
as he put it, to go look at some target
thousands of miles away.
Speaker 2: It's an incredible strain. And that crazy he used out
of his body. He considered that his normal state, the
strain was being forced into his body to work port back.
Speaker 1: There was one defining experiment though, that really cemented his status.
It was designed to be basically skeptic proof.
Speaker 2: The ultimate test. They wanted to prove beyond any shadow
of a doubt that his mind was a physical force.
Speaker 1: Let's break down the setup of that test. It was
just it's incredible.
Speaker 2: He was asked to change the temperature of a thermometer,
but the thermometer was sealed inside a thermist bottle.
Speaker 1: Which is already designed for insulation, right.
Speaker 2: And then that thermist bottle was itself sealed inside a
five gallon drum, multiple layers of physical insulated barriers, and
he had.
Speaker 1: To influence it remotely without touching anything.
Speaker 2: And he did it. He succeeded. He changed the temperature
of that deeply isolated instrument with his mind alone, and that.
Speaker 1: Just it broke their statistical models. It forced the CIA
the Pentagon to admit this was real physics that they
just didn't understand yet.
Speaker 2: You'd think after providing them with, as he called it,
the roadmap to the human soul, he would have been celebrated.
He was screaming at officials in the Pentagon to wake
up that the Russians were doing this too, But that's.
Speaker 1: Not what happened.
Speaker 2: He wasn't rewarded, he was used, and then he was erased.
Speaker 1: When the Cold War threat started to fade, they decided
the risk of this information getting out was greater than
its usefulness, so they just classified everything and.
Speaker 2: Forgot about him. His bitterness about that is so clear
in the transcripts. He said, it became classified, so I
couldn't talk about it anymore, and later on everybody forgot
about me. Because of that.
Speaker 1: He couldn't teach it, he couldn't write about it publicly.
The machine just locked it all away.
Speaker 2: It stripped him of his own life's work, the things
he loved, his art, his writing. He said, they were
given short shrift because the government didn't care about the man.
They wanted the weapon.
Speaker 1: They wanted the walking analysis factory, the mechanic, not the creator.
Speaker 2: And when the tool was no longer needed, they put
it back in the box and locked it. They tried
to classify a mind. They could walk through walls. It's
just it's the ultimate tragedy.
Speaker 1: But you can't really put consciousness in a box. After
the government work, after the classification, he didn't just stop.
Speaker 2: No, he pivoted. He was done with finding Russian submarines.
He was done with thermis bottles. He shifted his focus
from military targets to the universe itself.
Speaker 1: He started exploring the nature of the astral body, the
ability to travel not just to the next city, but
to other galaxies.
Speaker 2: He saw consciousness as a traveler. That was his word
for it. It could go where the physical body couldn't,
to the far galaxies. For him, this wasn't philosophy. It
was just a technical application of what he had already
proven in the lab.
Speaker 1: He had this great quote about it. Someone asked him
about going out of body and he just.
Speaker 2: Laughed at off. He said, sweetheart, just because you're here,
I'm having one of my few in the body.
Speaker 1: Experiences that says at all, doesn't it? For him, being
in the body was the weird temporary state.
Speaker 2: His default was non local. He'd say, I am not
this body. In terms of consciousness, the prison wasn't the lab.
It was being attached to the physical brain.
Speaker 1: And he started expressing this through his art right, creating
these huge, incredible paintings of other worlds and energies.
Speaker 2: Things that human eye isn't supposed to see. He called
it distant Sea, and he was very clear, this ability
flying over the Earth, entering someone else's mind, it's not
a miracle.
Speaker 1: He called it a technical skill.
Speaker 2: A technical skill, he used the Sanskrit word city, which
means an attainment or a power, something you have to
practice and master, like playing the piano. It's just a
skill our culture has forgotten and suppressed.
Speaker 1: And if it's a skill that means anyone can learn it,
you don't need to be born special. You just need
the haartware, the seventeen senses, and you need to remove
the software block, which.
Speaker 2: Leads to his final big challenge to our way of thinking. Yea,
the inside versus the outside.
Speaker 1: We're all programmed to excess about the external world. The
outside that's what's real, that's what's measurable.
Speaker 2: But Swan said, no, the internal universe, the inside, that's
the real engine. He said, we're all insiders. And he
had this simple little thought experiment to prove it, the
oval challenge. Yes, you tell the audience visualize an oval.
Now make it red, Now make it blue. Now put
the face of someone you hate inside it.
Speaker 1: And everyone could do it instantly.
Speaker 2: Instantly, And then he'd ask the question that science still
can't answer, how did you do that?
Speaker 1: Right? Science can explain how your eye sees a red oval.
It can't explain how your mind creates one out of nothing.
Speaker 2: And his point was profound. If you can create a
perfect reality inside your head instantly, then you can connect
that internal creative power to the external world once you
get past that sixteen bit filter.
Speaker 1: It's an incredible thought and it.
Speaker 2: Led to his ultimate conclusion about what a human being
really is. His final statement on it, you are a
creator engine. Mask is a biological drone.
Speaker 1: We're running on the factory settings, and they're nowhere near
our actual potential.
Speaker 2: Which brings us to today. Why did he leave this warning.
It wasn't just to talk about his past. It was
a prediction and a challenge.
Speaker 1: He predicted that within about thirty years, mainstream science would
finally have to admit that all this paranormal stuff is
just normal physics, physics we just didn't.
Speaker 2: Understand yet, and he said it's already happening. They're not
calling it esp of course, they're using new.
Speaker 1: Terms biocommunications, bioinformation transfer, neurobiology.
Speaker 2: They're mapping the hardware, they're studying the pineal gland, the
seventeen senses. They're basically reverse engineering the Ferrari without ever
giving credit to the original drivers who were locked away.
Speaker 1: And Swan saw danger in that, didn't he.
Speaker 2: A huge danger? He warned that machines are being built
right now to replicate what your brain already does naturally.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: He was afraid we'd be offered a technological substitute before
we remembered we had the original hardware built in.
Speaker 1: He wanted us to win, not the machines.
Speaker 2: Yes, he wanted humanity to claim its birthright. He made
this incredibly powerful statement, which I think is for everyone listening.
Speaker 1: What was it?
Speaker 2: He said? Remote viewing is surely to be considered a
species phenomenon, not a phenomenon of given individuals. It belongs
to you, Boks, to your children. It is your birth.
Speaker 1: But the programming is strong. The modern world is the
ultimate distraction machine, isn't it.
Speaker 2: It's designed to keep you looking at your phone, at
that external sixteen bit feed. It keeps you from looking
inward at your pineal gland, at the other seventeen senses.
It keeps your potential classified from yourself.
Speaker 1: But the hardware is still there.
Speaker 2: The hardware is still there. The seventeen senses are firing,
the eleven million bits per second are streaming in right now.
You are right this second, a vastly more capable, more
sensitive being than you've ever been told. The only thing
stopping you is the program that says it's impossible.
Speaker 1: So let's just do a final recap here. Let's let
these facts really sink in. We've learned today from classified
government research that you possess at least seventeen senses, but.
Speaker 2: Your conscious mind only gets sixteen bits of information out
of an eleven million bit stream every second.
Speaker 1: Your pinial gland is a planetary instrument. It can sense
solar flares ninety three million miles away and potentially even
future earthquakes.
Speaker 2: And your consciousness is a proven physical force capable of
changing the temperature of matter. Sealed inside a.
Speaker 1: Drum Ingo Swan lived this reality for two decades, push
the limits of what a human can do, and all
he got for it was to be classified and forgotten.
Speaker 2: He realized the deepest lock on this potential isn't in
some government vault. It's the programming inside your own head,
the voice that tells you the ocean of reality doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: The state classified the technology of the mind. But the
key to unlocking your own is still right there.
Speaker 2: And so considering Swan's beliefs that these abilities are written
into your DNA and that you're only consciously aware of
sixteen bits out of eleven million. We want to leave
you with his ultimate challenge, a question for you to
really think about.
Speaker 1: Are you ready to declassify your own mind? And what
do you think is the first step society should take
if this immense human potential has proven undeniably true.
Speaker 2: Let us know what you think. Drop into the comments
and tell us your thoughts. What's the first step for
you for society? We'd love to hear it.
Speaker 1: Thank you for joining us on this deep dive. If