Speaker 1: Get ready for twenty seventh day of March twenty twenty five, allegedly,
Speaker 1: according to that thing we call a calendar, this the
Speaker 1: Ocelli Effect. You there, and it's been a busy couple
Speaker 1: of days, but it is Thorsday as I speak. Anyway, Thursday,
Speaker 1: Thors Day. I can get the whole thing out, can
Speaker 1: I sure?
Speaker 2: Why not?
Speaker 1: So tomorrow night, Friday, we are going to do a
Speaker 1: regular call in show. I've been pretty busy this week.
Speaker 1: In fact, I was on Ground zero last night. But
Speaker 1: let's get to the business of the business, if you will,
Speaker 1: and set up this show, and I'll talk about Ground
Speaker 1: Zero and a couple other things that are going on
Speaker 1: this week. Hopefully Pete'll be able to join me on
Speaker 1: Friday for the call in show. If not, I'm going
Speaker 1: ahead with it anyway, and we'll also have the Age
Speaker 1: of Transitions and Uncle I think flying tomorrow as well.
Speaker 1: So let's get her started. The first thing I'm going
Speaker 1: to do is drop into the chat room because I
Speaker 1: had a weird, weird thing happen when I was, you know,
Speaker 1: perusing the news if you will, What is the big
Speaker 1: news story? Well, maybe I'll save the story itself for
Speaker 1: the end of the podcast today. But the reality is
Speaker 1: there's a lot of stuff going on regarding this whole
Speaker 1: thing with signal right, and the signal app and what's
Speaker 1: happening and all that, And I'm dropping in the live
Speaker 1: chatroom Atochelli dot com. Part of what maybe in the
Speaker 1: show notes later, this discussion of the signal and the Noise,
Speaker 1: which was a book right somewhere twenty twelve, twenty ten,
Speaker 1: somewhere in there, and it was interesting. It was an
Speaker 1: interesting book. It was about organizing data and the scientific
Speaker 1: reaction to it. But I happen to know this phrase
Speaker 1: was used in intelligentsia circles previous to it being a
Speaker 1: book title, and I have no idea why, but ever
Speaker 1: since the trope or or the sort of concept of
Speaker 1: sorting the signal from the noise. In other words, there
Speaker 1: is a large signal and there's a lot of noise
Speaker 1: around it, and you have to get the valuable information. Gee,
Speaker 1: it sounds like what I do on this news show,
Speaker 1: and through a lot of other things, you got to
Speaker 1: get the valuable information out of all the other crap,
Speaker 1: all the other noise, or picking corn out of literal
Speaker 1: crap as I speak live on a Thursday. You know,
Speaker 1: this is the way it rolls and downhill in some cases.
Speaker 1: I could just keep making jokes like that, but do
Speaker 1: I want to do it. Nah, We're gonna hit some headlines,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get to some updates, and we're gonna do
Speaker 1: all of this for you in a way that nobody
Speaker 1: else will. I promise you that much. Again, lots of
Speaker 1: live links in the live chatroom atochelli dot com so
Speaker 1: you can follow along with my reasoning as to why
Speaker 1: this stuff needs to be covered. And meanwhile, I'm only
Speaker 1: doing this once twice a week generally, and we're not
Speaker 1: doing a long one this time. So let's get to
Speaker 1: it with the table setters for the Thursday news show.
Speaker 1: What's happening? Well, we know about that signal thing, and
Speaker 1: we're going to get to it later, but of course
Speaker 1: there is much more to be covered twenty three in
Speaker 1: me remember that thing, You know how a lot of
Speaker 1: us conspiracy theorists were worried about it and all that
Speaker 1: kind of good stuff. Well it's sort of funny and
Speaker 1: a lot of people are paying attention to part of
Speaker 1: this story. But let's hit the headline from CNBC twenty
Speaker 1: three in me files for bankruptcy and well it's just
Speaker 1: sicky steps down as CEO. Okay, anyway from the main story,
Speaker 1: and we're not going to go too deep into it.
Speaker 1: Embattled Genetic Testing Company twenty three in me. Let me
Speaker 1: pause from the article. You guys, remember this was all
Speaker 1: the rage starting about ten years ago. Hey, go in
Speaker 1: and get your DNA checked. Find out what country you're from.
Speaker 1: For a little while, people were talking about on part cromagnuin,
Speaker 1: maybe I am part Barbarian, I don't know, some other
Speaker 1: previous incarnation of human. Yeah, maybe I'm a homo erectus.
Speaker 1: I come from that tribe, et cetera, et cetera. Uh oh,
Speaker 1: I found out as white as I think I am.
Speaker 1: There's some black people in my family tree. There's some
Speaker 1: white people in my family tree. Holy crap, I have
Speaker 1: Asians in there. People were doing this big time. Anyway
Speaker 1: back to A twenty three at ME, one of the
Speaker 1: biggest companies doing it out there for some reason, has
Speaker 1: filed for Chapter eleven. Anyway back to it and Battle
Speaker 1: Genetic Testing Company twenty three at ME, once valued at
Speaker 1: six billion dollars, filed for Chapter eleven bankruptcy protection in
Speaker 1: Missouri Federal Court on Sunday night. The company's CEO and Widjasiki,
Speaker 1: which I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing that right, has
Speaker 1: resigned from her role as chief executive, effective immediately, though
Speaker 1: she will remain a member of the board. Joseph Celsabage
Speaker 1: twenty three and Me's chief financial officer, that's the CFO
Speaker 1: and accounting officer, will serve as interim CEO, according to
Speaker 1: a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Quote,
Speaker 1: we have had many successes, but I equally take accountability
Speaker 1: for the challenges we have today. End quote Well, Jasiki
Speaker 1: wrote in a post on X early Monday morning. Quote
Speaker 1: there is no doubt that the challenge is faced by
Speaker 1: twenty three and me through an evolving business model, have
Speaker 1: been real but my belief in the company and its
Speaker 1: future is unwavering. Twenty three in Me declined to comment
Speaker 1: further on the filing. See how the CEO is a
Speaker 1: different person from the corporation anyway, Am I going to
Speaker 1: bore you with corporate stuff? No, What I want you
Speaker 1: to consider is this twenty three in me. If somebody
Speaker 1: decides to dissolve that company, or somebody new buys it up.
Speaker 1: You know, they might not honor all the privacy agreements
Speaker 1: in all you people that got suckered into Let me
Speaker 1: discover if I've got Asians in my family tree. I
Speaker 1: want to prove my positive whiteness, or maybe I want
Speaker 1: to reveal somehow guilty white man. I want to show
Speaker 1: that at least there's some black people in my tree.
Speaker 1: You know, all those wonderful people who had all these
Speaker 1: different intentions and wanted their genetics to tell them about
Speaker 1: their future, and they're past all in one shot. Here's
Speaker 1: the thing, privacy. You think you're gonna be able to
Speaker 1: get away with stuff? Do you think you can get
Speaker 1: away without being now exposed to God knows who this
Speaker 1: will get sold to. Oh, by the way, could there
Speaker 1: be seizures of this information, all of this DNA stuff.
Speaker 1: Not like the government's not involved in it already, but
Speaker 1: let's just say they weren't. For hypothetical purposes here now
Speaker 1: the government could come along and buy up guess what
Speaker 1: your data, your information, your entire genome, your code. Nobody's
Speaker 1: talking about this. Where is the information going to go?
Speaker 1: Where's the genetic testing and all the linkage? You know
Speaker 1: they've caught criminals this way, they got the what do
Speaker 1: they call them? The oh my good, in this sweat,
Speaker 1: what is it? The California the guy who was the
Speaker 1: big time Golden State mass murderer, right, the Golden State
Speaker 1: serial killer, the Golden State rapist, that guy who was
Speaker 1: at one time misnamed the Knightstalker, and at certain points
Speaker 1: they thought maybe he was part of the Zodiac mess.
Speaker 1: And it turns out it was an ex cop and
Speaker 1: they didn't catch him until he was eighty something because
Speaker 1: his nephews or whatever went to eight you know, twenty
Speaker 1: three in me and dropped their genetics on it. Somebody
Speaker 1: went and busted them, and the future of pre crime
Speaker 1: is all laden in this possibility. Yes, indeed, I'm going
Speaker 1: to minority reporting my thoughts. But you don't even got
Speaker 1: to go there. How about just people mishandling your genetics.
Speaker 1: I know some of you don't believe OJ did it,
Speaker 1: but geez, you know plenty of genetic material around there
Speaker 1: under the Simpson name. Oh maybe it was his son.
Speaker 1: No conspiracy theories on this stuff today. I'm telling you
Speaker 1: this is a dangerous precedent and the unforeseen consequences that
Speaker 1: people wind up running into when they make decisions to
Speaker 1: throw their literal selves and their own personal treasures into
Speaker 1: the pot.
Speaker 3: Only you could be so bold.
Speaker 4: The Imperial Senate will not to steal this when they
Speaker 4: hear you've attackted.
Speaker 5: How dare the press not believe me that I went
Speaker 5: after my mother with a hammer?
Speaker 1: He said, What did he say, Darth Trump? Uh? Oh,
Speaker 1: something's going on with my playback? That sucks. Maybe it
Speaker 1: was because they're jamming me with commercial crap all of
Speaker 1: a sudden when I don't want it. Of course, he
Speaker 1: went after his mother with a hammer. He wanted to
Speaker 1: hit her on the head. I don't know what you're
Speaker 1: talking about him that I tried to stab a friend
Speaker 1: of mine.
Speaker 6: But now it's changed.
Speaker 7: Holy, here is dangerous.
Speaker 3: Word of this gets out.
Speaker 5: It could generate sympathy for the rebellion in the Senate bill.
Speaker 8: What I said, including my remarks right afterwards, she said
Speaker 8: it was very unfair the way the union die.
Speaker 7: Before She'll tell you anything.
Speaker 8: You've known me for a long time, but I do
Speaker 8: get along with people. I deal with foreign countries. I've
Speaker 8: made a lot of money dealing against China.
Speaker 1: I've made a lot of plans. Are not on board
Speaker 1: this ship? And no transmissions were made.
Speaker 8: I just released my financials and people were amazed at
Speaker 8: how good they are. They're great, And I did something,
Speaker 8: you know, I employed thousands of people.
Speaker 6: I employ you know.
Speaker 8: I don't know if you saw it, but the Nevadopol
Speaker 8: just came out and.
Speaker 1: It was fantastical. I mean, I certainly remember the opening
Speaker 1: scenes of Star Wars, just like this Christianity and religion.
Speaker 9: But I don't try to Franknesus with your sorcerer's way,
Speaker 9: as Lord Vader, your sad devotion to that ancient religion
Speaker 9: has not helped you cunjure up the stolen data tapes
Speaker 9: are giving you clairvoyance enough to find the rebels hidden.
Speaker 8: I deal with foreign countries. I've made a lot of
Speaker 8: money dealing against China. I've made a lot of money
Speaker 8: dealing against many other countries. I have a great relationship.
Speaker 8: In a BusinessWeek Paul, they said, who do you most prefer?
Speaker 10: You know, I talked about meda release guarantee you. I
Speaker 10: would add them out.
Speaker 6: Anyway.
Speaker 1: That's just a quick word from Darth Trump. Moving forward, though,
Speaker 1: there's lots of words from Darth Trump coming up. But
Speaker 1: maybe we got to find out what's happening regarding the
Speaker 1: Black Sea and the ceasefire and Ukraine. So how about
Speaker 1: we go to Fox News for that and see what
Speaker 1: they are saying about it if we can get through
Speaker 1: the rhetorical parts of the quick broadcast here, this is yeah,
Speaker 1: from the main network at Fox News.
Speaker 11: And Ukraine agreeing to a ceasefire in the Black Sea,
Speaker 11: and President Trump says this could be a major first
Speaker 11: step to put an end to all the fighting.
Speaker 10: And deep discussions with Russia and Ukraine. And I would
Speaker 10: say it's going well, but it's it's a situation we
Speaker 10: should have never had to even think about, should have
Speaker 10: never happened. We are making a lot of progress.
Speaker 1: Well, there you go. That's Trump's overall report regarding the
Speaker 1: situation in Ukraine and the ceasefire and the progress or
Speaker 1: lack thereof which everybody is asking about. But of course
Speaker 1: that's just one aspect of what's going on in Washington
Speaker 1: to day. And maybe we should get to a few
Speaker 1: other things. After all, there's this interesting report. Let's just
Speaker 1: see is this Roland? Oh, this is Roland. Interesting report
Speaker 1: from the Hill, and Crockett calls Texas Governor Abbott, Governor
Speaker 1: hot Wheels. Okay, Representative Jasmine Crockett, Democrat from Texas, is
Speaker 1: drawing sharp criticism excuse me for comments made about Texas
Speaker 1: Governor Greg Abbott, Republican At the Human Rights Campaign's Los
Speaker 1: Angeles dinner on Saturday. Crockett began her remarks by calling
Speaker 1: for those okay gathered to pray for her, because who
Speaker 1: knows what i'maa end up saying. That's in quotes by
Speaker 1: the i'maa end up saying. She then proceeded to speak
Speaker 1: of the challenge of being a black woman in America,
Speaker 1: followed by praising those with intersecting identities such as being black, female,
Speaker 1: and LGBTQ, before she spoke of the challenges facing Texas.
Speaker 1: Y'all know, we got governor hot wheels down there. Come
Speaker 1: on now in quotes, that is, Crockett said, drawing laughter
Speaker 1: and applause from the audience. And this is in quotes.
Speaker 1: And the only thing hot about him is that he
Speaker 1: is a hot a space space mess, honey, That's how
Speaker 1: she categorized it. And of course, you know, banging on
Speaker 1: a disabled guy, that's okay among the super liberal who
Speaker 1: would tell you that you were ablest for doing so,
Speaker 1: and all that good stuff, right, maybe I missed something. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I miss a lot of things. I'll tell you something else.
Speaker 1: I miss some of the old cartoon shows as well.
Speaker 12: The gloomy over Casky had given way to bright sunshine.
Speaker 12: As Air Force one touchdown in Dallas, Lee Harvey Oswald
Speaker 12: purchased a Coca cola from a vending machine and was
Speaker 12: preparing to eat a chicken lunch.
Speaker 1: You gotta love this. This is a bedtime story. Dale Gribble,
Speaker 1: otherwise known as Rusty Shackelford, believe it or not, reading
Speaker 1: a bedtime story to his quote, son and quote.
Speaker 12: Joseph President's motorcade proceeded through downtown Dallas towards de Lee Plaza.
Speaker 11: Who was it called Julie Plaza anyway?
Speaker 12: Hmmm, excellent question. In Joseph didn't really say here we
Speaker 12: could see appendix. But that's what's been keeping the kitchen
Speaker 12: table from wobbling all these years.
Speaker 1: So he's reading from the Warren Report, obviously, and it
Speaker 1: looks very similar to one of the ones published by
Speaker 1: the New York Times at that time, not the Government
Speaker 1: Printing Office version of it. But anyway, it is what
Speaker 1: it is, It was what it was. How about we
Speaker 1: get to a little bit of an update on that
Speaker 1: circumstance because I was on Ground zero Radio last night
Speaker 1: tried to get through some questions with Clyde Lewis and
Speaker 1: his audience, but they were immediately asking me about stuff
Speaker 1: that Judy Baker said, even though they didn't know about it.
Speaker 1: They were asking me about James files. They were asking
Speaker 1: me about E. Howard Hunt's confession, and Clyde Lewis himself
Speaker 1: was talking about bodies being switched between JD Tipping and JFK.
Speaker 1: So it was ridiculous conspiracy night on Ground zero. But
Speaker 1: since since I am now allegedly the what are they
Speaker 1: calling me the industry ambassador for JFK Lancer Media Industry Ambassador.
Speaker 1: That's my title currently with the board. I think I'm
Speaker 1: going to revisit that and ask for a new title.
Speaker 1: But anyway, during my outreach now as we will be
Speaker 1: finalizing plans in April for the conference in Dallas, I
Speaker 1: spoke on Ground zero last night about what the document
Speaker 1: dumps which have been happening. By the way, now everybody
Speaker 1: knew about the March eighteenth, seven pm Eastern dump, which
Speaker 1: started out with thirty two thousand pages. Okay, an additional
Speaker 1: thirty one thousand pages. You know, we're released at ten
Speaker 1: thirty pm same day, and then on the twentieth of March,
Speaker 1: just to keep score, thirteen thousand, seven hundred pages released
Speaker 1: on the twentieth, then on the twenty sixth, yep the
Speaker 1: twenty sixth, as in yesterday, fifty three more pages. So
Speaker 1: if we add it all together, we have a total
Speaker 1: of let's see, sixty three, seventy three, seventy six, seventy
Speaker 1: six thousand, and seventy seven thousand and a couple pages
Speaker 1: in my quick estimate here, not quite the eighty thousand
Speaker 1: that Trump said, but why not. Rough estimate works for me.
Speaker 1: But that's where we are so far. And oh, by
Speaker 1: the way, even though I see certain things have originated
Speaker 1: with the FBI, I'm not so certain that we have
Speaker 1: the brand new, touted new FBI documents out there. But anyway,
Speaker 1: this is quite amazed to run through. Quite the gauntlet
Speaker 1: information wise, and something not meant for the inexperience, which
Speaker 1: I tried to explain to Clyde Lewis, and I've tried
Speaker 1: to be generous about regarding Tulca Gabbert, the current DNI.
Speaker 1: Anybody like Radcliffe was the head of CIA right now?
Speaker 1: Do they even know what it is they're supposed to
Speaker 1: be protecting as protectors of their agencies? Do they care?
Speaker 1: Or is this just part of the political theater. All
Speaker 1: of these questions are valid. But in the meantime, are
Speaker 1: are we learning anything? Everybody wants to know? Do you
Speaker 1: have a smoking gun? What's the solution? Did Oswald really
Speaker 1: do it?
Speaker 6: On and on?
Speaker 1: And of course they wheeled out Gerald Posner recently on NBC.
Speaker 1: I think nobody tuned in for that, maybe partially because
Speaker 1: his face is now morphing into something that resembles a
Speaker 1: Guy Fawkes mask from a couple of years ago. Remember
Speaker 1: the anonymous mask to everybody was buying from the big corporation,
Speaker 1: supposedly out there to fight big corporations. Well that was
Speaker 1: going on for quite a while. But anyway, Gerald Posner
Speaker 1: gets hold out, nobody cares. Jeff Morley is making the
Speaker 1: rounds everywhere, and even Representative Luna was on the massive
Speaker 1: zoom chat that we had through JFK Fax last week.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Maybe he's doing one right now as
Speaker 1: I speak. I would think he might if he doesn't
Speaker 1: have other Previously booked media interviews in hand, he's been
Speaker 1: on Bill O'Reilly, he's been out there, and Jeff has
Speaker 1: made some pretty astounding statements that I don't necessarily agree with,
Speaker 1: but to some degree he's correct, at least on some
Speaker 1: of this stuff. But everybody pause and calm down. Nobody's
Speaker 1: wrong yet, nobody's right yet. And if you take a
Speaker 1: listen to the discussion between myself and Larry Hancock and
Speaker 1: Mike Swanson last night, you might get a hint that
Speaker 1: it is still a work in progress. But again, we're
Speaker 1: not seeing anything that's super super brand new. I mean,
Speaker 1: a couple of things, pages that were previously redacted aro out. Yes,
Speaker 1: a couple of previous reactions have been lifted. Yes, But
Speaker 1: are we seeing anything super like, Oh my god, I
Speaker 1: can't believe this document came out.
Speaker 6: Not so much.
Speaker 1: However, if you're somebody who is interested in filling in
Speaker 1: the many secretive gaps when it comes to people like
Speaker 1: James Jesus Angleton, my friends, there is a trove of
Speaker 1: information in there, new stuff, some of it some of
Speaker 1: it not so new, and things that researchers new but
Speaker 1: the public can now see plainly. Okay, because here's a fact,
Speaker 1: and I do mean an absolute fact. Angleton lied under
Speaker 1: Oh repeatedly about a bunch of things. Also, why in
Speaker 1: the hell does Angleton, a week ahead of the assassination
Speaker 1: have the personnel file of Lee Harby Oswald on his
Speaker 1: desk a week before with the FBI dropping an alert,
Speaker 1: Jay Edgar Hoover clearly having an alert about him, And
Speaker 1: by the way, people were pestering Hoover, not just at
Speaker 1: the CIA, giving him a snow job over what happened
Speaker 1: in Mexico City, but in addition, Jay Edgar Hoover's getting
Speaker 1: a snow job about a bunch of things. And then
Speaker 1: on top of it, Lee Rby Oswald's kookie mother, Marguerite,
Speaker 1: is contacting him, trying to figure out where the hell
Speaker 1: is my son? Why has he disappeared? Oh, by the bye,
Speaker 1: on his way to the Soviet Union at a time
Speaker 1: when that was certainly not easy to do. He's on
Speaker 1: his way to the Soviet Union. I can't get in
Speaker 1: touch with him. Nobody is giving me any answers, And
Speaker 1: Jay Edgar Hoover's looking at this going why do I care? Well?
Speaker 1: There might have been several reasons why he cared and
Speaker 1: Hoover knew who the hell Lee Harvey Oswald was. We
Speaker 1: haven't been able to prove that out in papers. But
Speaker 1: the CI SIG, you know, Counterintelligence Special Investigation Unit. This guy,
Speaker 1: James Jesus Angleton, legend for many reasons in black ops,
Speaker 1: covert ops and in fact influential in world history. For
Speaker 1: some reason, has twenty four year old alleged loner loser
Speaker 1: Lee Harvey Oswald's file on his desk. But of course
Speaker 1: the CIA never heard of the guy previously, right right,
Speaker 1: Well no, if he got half a brain, no, But
Speaker 1: you know, half a brain is way well ahead of
Speaker 1: the majority of the American public anymore. So everybody wants answers,
Speaker 1: but nobody knows how to do the digging, and people
Speaker 1: are making proclamations and nobody, and I do mean nobody
Speaker 1: in the media has accurately nailed it. Just yet Morley's
Speaker 1: giving the best explanations and getting the most attention. But
Speaker 1: the truth is, whether he's on Bill O'Reilly, or he's
Speaker 1: going on Al Jazeera next, or he's going on NBC,
Speaker 1: and he's going to be able to testify on April
Speaker 1: Fool's Day in front of the Congress with Representative Luna
Speaker 1: taking another chance after she got a little bit burned
Speaker 1: with the UAP thing, Okay, with the JFK thing. Now
Speaker 1: has she become the designated conspiracy uh, you know, theory
Speaker 1: catcher in the Congress. I'm not certain, but it wouldn't
Speaker 1: be a bad title to have, and at this point
Speaker 1: it's going to get her some popularity.
Speaker 6: So I don't know.
Speaker 1: I don't know how that's all going to go.
Speaker 3: The greatest strank.
Speaker 1: Is played at the American public to the Kelly, I'm gonna.
Speaker 13: My name is Alex Deboule, I'm gonna turn you out,
Speaker 13: Phara and Farah and I practice.
Speaker 1: Course by Andrey Law.
Speaker 7: I'm from Macon, Georgia. I grew up here.
Speaker 4: I love the small town field that this place gives
Speaker 4: and how someone can feel at home with their being.
Speaker 14: You like history, real history that you were never taught
Speaker 14: in schools. Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear Bombs and Nation
Speaker 14: Building in Southeast Asia by author Mike Swanson, with new
Speaker 14: documentation never seen before that'll open your eyes to events
Speaker 14: that led up to this. Why the Vietnam War, Nuclear
Speaker 14: Bombs are nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty five
Speaker 14: through nineteen sixty one. Get your copy today at Amazon
Speaker 14: dot com. Why the Vietnam War by author Mike.
Speaker 2: Swanson revelation through conversations.
Speaker 4: Nuclear holocaust, uranium is right, think called nuclear weapons and
Speaker 4: other things like lots of you know what uranium is right?
Speaker 4: Bad things things are done with uranium in living, Some
Speaker 4: bad things.
Speaker 13: The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national
Speaker 13: transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in
Speaker 13: the context of the times and reveals never before published
Speaker 13: information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not
Speaker 13: have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred
Speaker 13: years ago. His assassination took place in the context of
Speaker 13: the Cold War and the rise of the national security state.
Speaker 7: Before World War.
Speaker 13: II, the United States was a continental republic. In the
Speaker 13: decade that followed, it became an imperial superpower. Generals such
Speaker 13: as Curtis LeMay not only wanted to invade Cuba, but
Speaker 13: knew that there were short range missiles on the island
Speaker 13: aren't with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy because
Speaker 13: they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have led
Speaker 13: to a Third World War, and they wanted to go
Speaker 13: to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson reveals why,
Speaker 13: and we'll show you what President Kennedy was up against.
Speaker 13: For more information The War State dot com.
Speaker 15: Do you remember that time when Benjamin Fulford said that
Speaker 15: an Asian secret society was going to dispatch ninjas to
Speaker 15: take down the Illuminati.
Speaker 1: That's interesting, Colatoon, Yeah.
Speaker 15: Did that ever work out too good?
Speaker 11: No?
Speaker 15: And again, but here on o'chelly dot com Radio network,
Speaker 15: things work out a bit better, don't they.
Speaker 16: Much better is clear and understanding about the programs. The
Speaker 16: programs much clearer. That's getting live people into it. They
Speaker 16: really have a good conversation going.
Speaker 1: Much better, much better.
Speaker 15: I say, forget Benjamin Fulford and his ninjas and listen
Speaker 15: to the Ocelly dot com Radio Network.
Speaker 16: I agree, it's straight to the point, straight talk, and
Speaker 16: I like that idea.
Speaker 14: Dot Comili dot com into.
Speaker 1: Pausation.
Speaker 3: It's a strange.
Speaker 17: Oh Chili dot com, Oh Chili dot com.
Speaker 1: Hey, let's get back into setting the table, if you will.
Speaker 1: I might have left my mic on during all those commercials,
Speaker 1: so hopefully you guys didn't hear the zippo too loud
Speaker 1: or anything else.
Speaker 6: But it is what it is.
Speaker 1: So what else has been going on before we get
Speaker 1: to the main story of the night. I forgot to
Speaker 1: cover some more of the table setters, didn't I Republicans
Speaker 1: actually funded that, you know, Trump for a couple of
Speaker 1: days through a fit over this portrait of himself in Colorado.
Speaker 1: He doesn't like it, he hates it. It's ugly this
Speaker 1: and that. It turns out that somebody had put it
Speaker 1: over there. And I've got a story on YouTube. I
Speaker 1: could play a clip, I'm not gonna, but the whole
Speaker 1: story's told on there. The deal is that Trump kind
Speaker 1: of somebody put a picture of Vladimir Putin in the
Speaker 1: empty space where Trump's portrait could have went along a
Speaker 1: pantheon sort of the presidents of the United States in
Speaker 1: the capitol in Colorado. So then some Republicans got together
Speaker 1: and said, screw this. You know, this guy's the forty
Speaker 1: fifth president, and they did it back then.
Speaker 6: Let's fund this.
Speaker 1: Let's get ten twenty thousand dollars, get a real artist
Speaker 1: to come in do a painting of Donald Trump, put
Speaker 1: it up, and you know, give him his due. Well,
Speaker 1: Trump is pissed. He thinks Democrats did this to him
Speaker 1: on purpose. He thinks the painting is terrible. I gotta be.
Speaker 6: Honest with you. I looked at the painting. It's not
Speaker 6: so bad.
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know if it's worth ten grand,
Speaker 1: but geez, they raised like ten grand to get this done,
Speaker 1: you know, officially, nicely, nice frame, you know, oil painting.
Speaker 1: I mean, these things are not cheap. And somebody did
Speaker 1: a portrait of him. I don't think he likes the
Speaker 1: way he looks, because it looks pretty much like him,
Speaker 1: except frankly, the flesh tone is a little off because
Speaker 1: usually he's a lot more orange than he is in
Speaker 1: that painting. But otherwise I don't get it, but he
Speaker 1: does for some reason, and he's pissed. So what can
Speaker 1: you do? Exactly? Texas lawmakers have advanced a bill to
Speaker 1: make it a crime for teachers to assign catch her.
Speaker 6: In the rye.
Speaker 1: Now, that could open up a whole bunch of interesting
Speaker 1: things out there in your minds, because Catcher and the Rise,
Speaker 1: of course, a very controversial book and all that.
Speaker 6: Hey, you know what.
Speaker 1: A Danish official in the parliament this week also told
Speaker 1: Trump to have off, even though he seems to be
Speaker 1: getting more and more serious about this idea of taking
Speaker 1: what Greenland, okay away from I guess the Danes.
Speaker 6: I mean, what the hell, man, you know, I mean,
Speaker 6: it is what it is. But anyway, other stuff going on.
Speaker 1: Republican truck driver edder ends his bid to be New
Speaker 1: Jersey governor, and back's Bill Spadilla. And I don't even
Speaker 1: know this guy Spadilla, but that is a story, which is,
Speaker 1: you know, hit New Jersey. I guess a few days
Speaker 1: ago governor's race pairing down, and of course it'll go
Speaker 1: to the major parties as per usual, and it's about
Speaker 1: time to swing back. So whichever they got in there,
Speaker 1: I think it's Democrat right now because missus O's mother
Speaker 1: is pissed off all the time at the New Jersey governor,
Speaker 1: so I think that automatically indicates he's a Democrat.
Speaker 6: Anyway.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so probably it's a Republican going to come in
Speaker 1: because Jersey does the dance back and forth faster and
Speaker 1: more furious than the presidential pendulum swing. Tesla stocks keep
Speaker 1: jumping back and forth, they surge up, they take major hits.
Speaker 1: Elon loses a billion, gains a billion, and he yawns
Speaker 1: and goes back to doje. Anyway, so you know it
Speaker 1: is what it will be. And hey, along with that
Speaker 1: Zelensky story, well, excuse me, not the Zolensky story, but
Speaker 1: the story of you know, Russia and Ukraine and the
Speaker 1: war that people want to categorize and characterize in all
Speaker 1: different ways. There's a quite an interesting story here where
Speaker 1: the media started running with and I don't know why
Speaker 1: this concept of Zelensky is predicting Putin will die soon
Speaker 1: and I'm not by the way, this is again foxnews
Speaker 1: dot com. Zelensky sensationally predicts Putin quote will die soon.
Speaker 6: End quote.
Speaker 1: Now, one does wonder when the official, you know, government
Speaker 1: media outlet has this to say, how well precise is it,
Speaker 1: how reliable is it? Is it one of these things
Speaker 1: that is totally and brutally absolutely correct. Not so sure? Anyways, Yeah,
Speaker 1: apparently President Zelenski made this stunning prediction about Vladimir Putin
Speaker 1: and his health in recent days, in the midst of
Speaker 1: this conversation, this negotiation and the Black Sea ces fire.
Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, pay no attention because the
Speaker 1: official government outlet here, Fox News, the mouthpiece of the
Speaker 1: current administration, is not telling you about the back and
Speaker 1: forth and the fact that they thought they kind of
Speaker 1: had to cease fire in hand, and nobody stopped shooting
Speaker 1: a couple of.
Speaker 6: Times just in the past week.
Speaker 1: So either somebody doesn't have good command and control or
Speaker 1: somebody's being a little disingenuous about their true intent to
Speaker 1: cease fire. And notice I didn't apply it to anybody,
Speaker 1: but take a look at what's happening. You should be
Speaker 1: able to see this with your own eyes. Oh wait,
Speaker 1: our media is not really covering it well, and I
Speaker 1: don't have the money to put correspondence there, and everybody
Speaker 1: in Ukraine that used to like.
Speaker 6: Me hates me. So what can I do? Not much?
Speaker 1: Kind of sucks, doesn't it anyway? Why don't we get
Speaker 1: to the rest of the art of the steal and
Speaker 1: deal and wheel and make it all become real? Because signal,
Speaker 1: the signal and the noise. I started talking about that earlier.
Speaker 1: And of course it's an app. It's sort of like
Speaker 1: a snapchat at chat app. As far as I understand,
Speaker 1: I'm not a big app guy. I don't have a
Speaker 1: cell phone on my own, but you know, it does
Speaker 1: seem to me this would not be the best place
Speaker 1: to conduct conversations that have something to do with national security. Now,
Speaker 1: before anybody starts screaming at me that I'm a bad guy,
Speaker 1: and I'm taking the liberal position, and I'm taking the
Speaker 1: mainstream media's position. And of course Trump himself had certain
Speaker 1: things to say about this. You know, for instance, the
Speaker 1: Atlantic reporter who was left in on the chat with
Speaker 1: the you know, the head of the Pentagon over there right,
Speaker 1: the Defense secretary and the vice president and other people
Speaker 1: that are important in the Trump administration.
Speaker 6: That guy was being called.
Speaker 1: A liar and you know, basically a hit job kind
Speaker 1: of artist there, you know, the kind of guy who
Speaker 1: just does gotcha stuff in the media. He was running
Speaker 1: around rescue, rescue, rescue.
Speaker 6: He was one of these guys.
Speaker 1: This is nothing but a witch hunt. Why am I
Speaker 1: doing the impression? Let's go straight to Trump's comments ourselves.
Speaker 11: Mister president, are you going.
Speaker 15: To change any of the practices that your national security
Speaker 15: officials use?
Speaker 1: Hacker? Okay, are you going to change any of this?
Speaker 1: Is Caitlyn Collins from CNN asking the question in the
Speaker 1: back of the room, and he is already pissed because
Speaker 1: he doesn't like calling on her at all during these pressers.
Speaker 1: But she's asking the question, You're going to change anything?
Speaker 1: Because this seems a little odd, And of course Trump
Speaker 1: has had many things to say about this, but I
Speaker 1: want to let his words speak. He's on Mike, so
Speaker 1: you will hear it. But this is in the aftermath
Speaker 1: because the Atlantic reporter remained in there, and people have
Speaker 1: been accusing him now of all kinds of things, and
Speaker 1: even Trump was suggesting, Hey, we're not sure how he
Speaker 1: got in there. How does somebody get in on this? Well,
Speaker 1: it's the signal app and somebody invited him in. But
Speaker 1: that couldn't be somebody either willfully doing this on purpose,
Speaker 1: letting them know that we're about to attack in Yemen
Speaker 1: and the Houthis are about to get a kick. But
Speaker 1: we got to talk about what's what Man enough out
Speaker 1: of me. Let's go back to Trump first, and then
Speaker 1: let's take a listen to how A reads the actual
Speaker 1: signal chat.
Speaker 6: How about that porter.
Speaker 18: Was inadfortently added to a group chat about attacks on Yemen.
Speaker 10: Well, I think it's a question. I've been asked now
Speaker 10: and I've given it a few answers, and they've all
Speaker 10: been the same. We have an amazing group or national
Speaker 10: security now is stronger than it's ever been. We have
Speaker 10: had a very, very successful numerous attacks in that area.
Speaker 10: These are people that shoot down ships. Not only are
Speaker 10: ships ships all over the world. They're shooting down right
Speaker 10: out of the water and damaging them badly or they're
Speaker 10: going down. They're also shooting anything that happens.
Speaker 3: To be flying in the area.
Speaker 10: We hit them very, very hard. There was no classified information,
Speaker 10: as I understand it.
Speaker 1: They used a.
Speaker 10: A app, if you want to call it an app
Speaker 10: that a lot of people use, a lot of people
Speaker 10: in government use, a lot of people in the media use.
Speaker 10: And I think I'll ask Mike, Mike is here.
Speaker 1: Do you want to respond to thatness? I want to
Speaker 1: buy it. Okay, it's look again, I'm listening to his
Speaker 1: words from his mouth, right, and whatever you do, don't
Speaker 1: try and read what the hell Trump is saying, because
Speaker 1: it is completely incoherent if you try to read it,
Speaker 1: all right, but listening to what he means to say.
Speaker 1: I am listening to what he means to say, and
Speaker 1: he's got the guy who has now been sort of
Speaker 1: scapegoaded as the guy who let the journalist into the conversation,
Speaker 1: even though supposedly initial reporting said that Hegsethn invited him in,
Speaker 1: and maybe he did I'm not certain here, Okay, I'm
Speaker 1: exploring this along with everybody else. And it's pretty wild
Speaker 1: that a reporter is there ahead of an attack, whether
Speaker 1: it's classified information or not. I dare say that a
Speaker 1: heads up on an attack an hour or two before
Speaker 1: it happens, even if it's not classified. It's not the
Speaker 1: sort of thing you want to be sharing with a
Speaker 1: guy who has a readership at the Atlantic.
Speaker 6: Especially the editor in chief.
Speaker 1: But anyway, he asked the guy, Hey, you got anything
Speaker 1: to say about this, because really you're the scapegoat if
Speaker 1: there's gonna be one. But notice the way Trump double
Speaker 1: speaks everything. If you want to call it an app,
Speaker 1: it's an app.
Speaker 6: I don't know. Maybe it is, you know what.
Speaker 1: There might have been plans, but nobody put any plans
Speaker 1: in there, so nothing was classified. But I don't know
Speaker 1: how a journalist gets into everything double speak and double
Speaker 1: swipe back and forth. So that really, if you take
Speaker 1: the letter of every single word he says seriously, then
Speaker 1: you can't sort it out. Try reading a transcriptor this.
Speaker 1: It's amazing. Anyway, of course, nowadays the o'cell effect has
Speaker 1: a transcript. If you go over to speaker and you
Speaker 1: pick up any of the podcasts off a speaker. There
Speaker 1: are transcripts available for you right there, and you can
Speaker 1: even download him now. So I made sure that's all
Speaker 1: working so you could follow along with Trump and what
Speaker 1: I'm saying even if you like. And it's pretty good.
Speaker 1: It's an AI automatic thing. It works all right, And
Speaker 1: we're gonna get into some more AI in a minute.
Speaker 1: But see what happens when Trump turns to his guy
Speaker 1: who's sitting at the end of the table, purposely during
Speaker 1: this pressure to make sure that he can address this stuff.
Speaker 1: And again that's Caitlyn Collins from CNN who asked the question.
Speaker 19: The lessons was a lot of journalists in this city
Speaker 19: who have made big names for themselves making up lies
Speaker 19: about this president, whether it's the Russia hoax or making
Speaker 19: up lies about gold Star families, and this one in particular,
Speaker 19: I've never met, don't know, never communicated with, and we
Speaker 19: are and we are looking into and reviewing how the
Speaker 19: heck he got into this room. But I'll tell you
Speaker 19: what the world owes President Trump of favor. Under Biden,
Speaker 19: global shipping was shut down, pencrick attacks months between them,
Speaker 19: are destroyers being fired upon dozens of times. President Trump
Speaker 19: took decisive active action with his national security team, took
Speaker 19: out the head missileer, knocked out missiles, knocked out headquarters,
Speaker 19: knocked out communication sites, and for once, as we hear,
Speaker 19: as you all hear from every one of our allies,
Speaker 19: thank God for American leadership again, thank God for American strength.
Speaker 1: Okay, so there's always the kiss Trump's ass along with
Speaker 1: make sure to you know America is great again. America
Speaker 1: is great again because God blessed Trump, and thank you Trump,
Speaker 1: and thank you Trump. You got to do that even
Speaker 1: if you're in the room with him. But okay, fine,
Speaker 1: I'm not even objecting to any of that, and I'm
Speaker 1: trying to be objective.
Speaker 6: Here's the thing.
Speaker 1: The question is about security and secure communications, not about
Speaker 1: the success or lack of or whatever. You know, we
Speaker 1: don't need the after action report regarding the bombing of
Speaker 1: the Hootis and how much good you actually did, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, objectively, I leave it to you to
Speaker 1: figure out if this guy's telling you the truth about
Speaker 1: any of this. But this is deflection, and this is
Speaker 1: very typical. This is not unusual. This is what every
Speaker 1: administration does when they get caught doing something that looks stupid,
Speaker 1: and this is stupid to let a journalist into stuff
Speaker 1: as it's happening. Hey, you know what, I kind of
Speaker 1: feel like we should go with this, but I don't
Speaker 1: want to bail out Europe again. Ah, you know what,
Speaker 1: I'll let the AI read it to you. But let's
Speaker 1: just pick up on Trump's whole thing and see if
Speaker 1: this is the clip where he calls it a witch
Speaker 1: hunt or not.
Speaker 6: Here's the approause pause for a plug.
Speaker 19: Scurity team that was coordinating these efforts. As Director Ratclife
Speaker 19: testified today, his first day on the job, he was
Speaker 19: introduced to this app on his government systems at the
Speaker 19: CIA and at the State Department and otherwise. So, look,
Speaker 19: this journalist, mister president, wants the world talking about more
Speaker 19: hoaxes in this kind of nonsense, rather than the freedom.
Speaker 8: That you're enabling.
Speaker 19: And a key part of our sovereignty is open sea
Speaker 19: lanes and knocking the crap out of terrorists, which is.
Speaker 18: Exactly what your team.
Speaker 19: And Pete Hexa, a good friend and fellow veteran, is
Speaker 19: leading the charge.
Speaker 10: We had very very successful Excuse me, we had a
Speaker 10: very very successful evening and we've had a numerous successful
Speaker 10: evenings and days in that area. The Hoodies are absolutely
Speaker 10: on the run. The worst of them had been killed.
Speaker 1: He said. The Hoodies. By the way, I'm wondering how
Speaker 1: the blowfish are. But let's keep listening.
Speaker 10: Should have been done a long time ago by Biden.
Speaker 10: But Biden was an incompetent president. He couldn't do anything.
Speaker 10: He didn't nowhere where he was going. He had no clue.
Speaker 10: This guy had no clue. They should have been done
Speaker 10: a long time ago. As they shoot missiles at chips,
Speaker 10: randomly shoot missiles at chips, and they make their own missiles.
Speaker 10: You know, this is not an incompany group of people.
Speaker 10: They make their own missiles.
Speaker 3: They get the.
Speaker 10: Missiles also from Iran. It's an offshoot of Iran. Another roughshoot.
Speaker 10: You have Hamas, you have Hezbula, you have the Hoodies.
Speaker 10: You got a lot of stuff going on with Iran,
Speaker 10: and we sent a letter to Iran. You're gonna have
Speaker 10: to be speaking to us one way or the other
Speaker 10: pretty soon because we can't let this happen. But that's
Speaker 10: an app that a lot of people use. And somebody
Speaker 10: got on, I mean, happened to know. The guy's a
Speaker 10: total sleeves bag the Atlantic.
Speaker 17: The Atlantic is.
Speaker 10: A failed magazine does very very poorly. Nobody gives a
Speaker 10: damn about it. This gives it a little bit of
Speaker 10: a shot. And I will tell you this that they've
Speaker 10: made up more stories and.
Speaker 1: They're just a failing magazine.
Speaker 10: The public understands that he's a very good man. That
Speaker 10: man is a very good man right there that you
Speaker 10: criticize those spell.
Speaker 1: See now there was no strong criticism here. He's complaining
Speaker 1: about the overall cupboards that somebody says, you know, why
Speaker 1: in the hell did this guy let a journalist in.
Speaker 1: Let's let's take a quick listen to what it is
Speaker 1: they actually shared with this journalist from the Atlantic. Real quickly,
Speaker 1: I'll go to The Atlantic. Just because Jeffrey Goldberg printed
Speaker 1: an article and put out the text now because hey, look,
Speaker 1: none of it's classified, it's no that means I can
Speaker 1: release most of it. And he didn't even release all
Speaker 1: of it. He kept some of it back anyway, thinking
Speaker 1: that it still had some sensitivity and perhaps the Trump
Speaker 1: administration's sweeping declaration might not cover everything in the text.
Speaker 1: Right now, Are there absolutely detailed pinpoint plans here in
Speaker 1: this thing? No, but judge for yourself. If this is
Speaker 1: a good idea. Again from the Atlantic article, the Trump
Speaker 1: administration accidentally texted me its war plans, he says, okay.
Speaker 1: US national security leaders included me in a group chat
Speaker 1: about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn't think it
Speaker 1: could be real. Then the bombs started falling by Jeffrey Goldberg. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's see now. The world found out shortly after two
Speaker 1: pm Eastern Time on March fifteen that the United States
Speaker 1: was bombing who the targets across Yemen. Again, no blowfish.
Speaker 1: Back to the article, I, however, knew two hours before
Speaker 1: the first exploded that the attack might be coming. The
Speaker 1: reason I knew this is that Pete Hegseth, the Secretary
Speaker 1: of Defense, had texted me the war plan at eleven
Speaker 1: forty four am. The plan included precise information about weapons packages, targets,
Speaker 1: and timing. This is going to require some explaining. The
Speaker 1: story technically begins shortly after the Hamas invasion of Southern
Speaker 1: Israel in October twenty twenty three. The Huthis and I
Speaker 1: ran back terrorist organization whose motto is God is Great,
Speaker 1: Death to America, death to Israel, curse on the Jews.
Speaker 1: Victory to Islam. That's all in quotes, soon launched attacks
Speaker 1: on Israel and on international shipping, creating havoc for global
Speaker 1: trade throughout twenty twenty four. The Biden administration was ineffective
Speaker 1: encountering these hoo the attacks. The incoming Trump administration promised
Speaker 1: a tougher response. Now all of that is true, and
Speaker 1: Trump polded that you know he's not lying here is he?
Speaker 1: But what technically did he put in these chats? What
Speaker 1: was in there?
Speaker 11: Let's see team establishing a principles group for coordination on
Speaker 11: Huthy's particularly for over the next seventy two hours. My
Speaker 11: deputy Alex Wong is pulling together a Tiger team at
Speaker 11: deputy slash agency chief of staff level following up from
Speaker 11: the meeting in the sit room this morning for action items,
Speaker 11: and we'll be sending that out later this evening. Please
Speaker 11: provide the best staff POC from your team for us
Speaker 11: to coordinate with over the next couple days and over
Speaker 11: the weekend.
Speaker 1: Okay, again, this is Hegseth introducing. This is we're going
Speaker 1: to get together in this chat. We're going to discuss
Speaker 1: these things. Give me a point of contact to POC.
Speaker 1: And again this is AI reading it. It should be
Speaker 1: without you too many inflections or anything, almost you know, monotone,
Speaker 1: just to give you the sound of what it is.
Speaker 1: Somebody is reading in a group text here, or maybe
Speaker 1: they have their text being read to them on their phone.
Speaker 1: I don't know people can do that in their settings.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure Signal offers that option, but I think
Speaker 1: they do.
Speaker 6: Anyway, here we go with the rest of the AI.
Speaker 20: Thanks Mike need Him for State, Andy Baker for VP,
Speaker 20: Joe Kent for DNI.
Speaker 1: Okay, so this is you know, first of all, you
Speaker 1: start off with all the different cabinet people. You got
Speaker 1: jd Vance, you got Tulsea Gabbert, you got Okay, Pete
Speaker 1: Hegseth will chime in here shortly everybody who's the head
Speaker 1: of something fairly important here, the DNI, Ratcliffe comes in here.
Speaker 1: I think it's a certain point. The head of the CIA,
Speaker 1: you know, hegg set the course is the Defense Secretary. Look,
Speaker 1: these are all important people in this chat, and now
Speaker 1: they're naming their points of contact. Here's my underling that
Speaker 1: you need to be in contact with regarding coordination, and
Speaker 1: at the beginning of the chat, he says, we're coordinating
Speaker 1: the first seventy two hours. But again, let's go back
Speaker 1: to the AI and I'm gonna restrain myself and let
Speaker 1: you just hear it out. But remember, it's not telling
Speaker 1: you who's speaking. You just got us hear the voices
Speaker 1: change and get a gist of the conversation. Dan Katz
Speaker 1: for Treasury, Dan Caldwell for DoD, Brian.
Speaker 11: McCormick for NSC team, you should have a statement of
Speaker 11: conclusions with taskings per the President's guidance this morning in
Speaker 11: your high side inboxes State and DoD, we develop suggested
Speaker 11: notification lists for regional allies and partners. Joint staff is
Speaker 11: sending this AM a more specific sequence of events in
Speaker 11: the coming days, and we will work with DoD to
Speaker 11: ensure cos OVP and POTUS are briefed.
Speaker 1: Team.
Speaker 20: I am out for the day doing an economic event
Speaker 20: in Michigan, but I think we are making a mistake.
Speaker 20: Three percent of US trade runs through the Suez, forty
Speaker 20: percent of European trade does. There is a real risk
Speaker 20: that the public doesn't understand this or why it's necessary.
Speaker 1: This is jd Vance speaking about why it's necessary, just
Speaker 1: to inform you of who's speaking. The strongest reason to do.
Speaker 20: This is as Potus said, to send a message, but
Speaker 20: I am not sure the President is aware how inconsistent
Speaker 20: this is with his message on Europe. Right now, there's
Speaker 20: a further risk that we see a moderate to severe
Speaker 20: spike and oil prices. I am willing to support the
Speaker 20: consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself,
Speaker 20: but there is a strong argument for delaying this a month,
Speaker 20: doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where
Speaker 20: the economy is, etc.
Speaker 21: There is nothing time sensitive driving the timeline. We'll have
Speaker 21: the exact same options.
Speaker 1: In a month.
Speaker 21: The Israelis will likely take strikes and therefore ask us
Speaker 21: for more support to replenish whatever they use against the houthies,
Speaker 21: but that's a minor factor. I will send you the
Speaker 21: unclassed data we pulled on BAM shipping.
Speaker 18: From CIA perspective. We are mobilizing assets to support now,
Speaker 18: but a delay would not negatively impact us, and additional
Speaker 18: time would be used to identify better starting points for
Speaker 18: coverage on houthy leadership.
Speaker 1: Okay, the next one you're gonna hear from mis Hecseth again. Uh,
Speaker 1: but you just heard from the State Department the acting
Speaker 1: excuse me the acting. Uh oh, what is the the
Speaker 1: the acting director there at the White House, the acting
Speaker 1: you know, White House main man. And now you're gonna
Speaker 1: hear from Hegseth. You just heard from Radcliffe was the
Speaker 1: head of the CIA. So here comes he sis Vp.
Speaker 22: I understand your concerns and fully support you raising with
Speaker 22: potus important considerations, most of which are tough to know
Speaker 22: how they play out Economy, Ukraine, peace, Gaza, et cetera.
Speaker 22: I think messaging is going to be tough no matter what.
Speaker 22: Nobody knows who the hohu thies are, which is why
Speaker 22: we would need to stay focused on one Biden failed
Speaker 22: and two Iran funded.
Speaker 1: Okay, so they're they're laying out the messaging. Don't forget
Speaker 1: Biden failed at this and Iran funded, which is exactly,
Speaker 1: by the way, what the guy did at the end
Speaker 1: of the table there during Trump's presser. So here we go.
Speaker 1: Hegseth continues.
Speaker 22: Waiting a few weeks or a month does not fundamentally
Speaker 22: change the calculus. Two immediate risks on waiting. One this
Speaker 22: leaks and we look indecisive. Two Israel takes an action
Speaker 22: first or Gaza cease fire falls apart and we don't
Speaker 22: get to start this on our own terms. We can
Speaker 22: manage both. We are prepared to execute, and if I
Speaker 22: had final go or no go vote, I believe we should.
Speaker 1: This not about the Houthies.
Speaker 6: I see it as two things.
Speaker 22: One restoring freedom of navigation a core national interest, and
Speaker 22: two re established deterrence which Biden cratered. But we can
Speaker 22: easily pause, and if we do, I will do all
Speaker 22: we can to enforce one hundred percent OPSECT. I welcome
Speaker 22: other thoughts.
Speaker 1: Okay, so this is National Security Advisor Mike Waltz. That's
Speaker 1: the guy who was just talking before. Right.
Speaker 11: Trade figures we have are fifteen percent of global and
Speaker 11: thirty percent of container. It's difficult to break that down
Speaker 11: to US specific because much of the container either going
Speaker 11: through the Red Sea still or around the Cape of
Speaker 11: Good Hope. Our component's going to Europe that turns into
Speaker 11: manufactured goods for transatlantic trade to the United States. Whether
Speaker 11: we pull the plug or not. Today, European navies do
Speaker 11: not have the capability to defend against the types of
Speaker 11: sophisticated anti ship cruise missiles and drones the houthis are
Speaker 11: now using. So whether it's now or several weeks from now,
Speaker 11: it will have to be the United States that reopens
Speaker 11: these shipping lanes per the President's request. We are working
Speaker 11: with DoD and State to determine how to compile the
Speaker 11: cost associated and levy them on the Europeans as.
Speaker 1: Okay, so we're going to have let's see more from
Speaker 1: Waltz here.
Speaker 11: He continues, as we stated in the first PC, we
Speaker 11: have a fundamental decision of allowing the sea lanes to
Speaker 11: remain closed or to reopen them now or later. We
Speaker 11: are the only ones with the capability. Unfortunately, from a
Speaker 11: messaging standpoint, we absolutely add this to of horribles on
Speaker 11: why the Europeans must invest in their defense.
Speaker 1: Okay, and then next we're gonna hear from the Vice
Speaker 1: President jdvanch.
Speaker 20: At Pete Hegseth. If you think we should do it,
Speaker 20: let's go. I just hate bailing Europe out again. Let's
Speaker 20: just make sure our messaging is tight here, and if
Speaker 20: there are things we can do upfront to minimize risk
Speaker 20: to Saudi oil facilities, we should do it.
Speaker 22: And then heg Seth response, VP, I fully share your
Speaker 22: loathing of European freeloading. It's pathetic, but Mike is correct.
Speaker 22: We are the only ones on the planet on our
Speaker 22: side of the ledger who can do this. Nobody else
Speaker 22: even close. Question is timing. I feel like now is
Speaker 22: as good a time as any given POTUS directive to
Speaker 22: reopen shipping lanes.
Speaker 6: I think we should go.
Speaker 22: The POTUS still retains twenty four hours of decision space.
Speaker 1: Okay, so now we're gonna get the cheapest staff again.
Speaker 1: And this will be Stephen Miller talking about talking about
Speaker 1: his response to what Hexsets just said.
Speaker 11: As I heard it, the President was clear green light.
Speaker 11: But we soon make clear to Egypt and Europe what
Speaker 11: we expect in return. We also need to figure out
Speaker 11: how to enforce such a requirement.
Speaker 7: Eg.
Speaker 11: If Europe doesn't remunerate, then what if the US successfully
Speaker 11: restores freedom of navigation at great cost? There needs to
Speaker 11: be some further economic gain extracted in return.
Speaker 22: Then Heckset's response agree Team update time now eleven hundred
Speaker 22: forty four ET weather is favorable. Just confirmed with Sentcom.
Speaker 22: We are a go for mission launch twelve hundred and
Speaker 22: fifteen ET F eighteen's launch First Strike Package thirteen hundred
Speaker 22: and forty five trigger based F eighteen first Strike windows
Speaker 22: starts target terrorist is at his known location, so should
Speaker 22: be on time. Also, strike drones launch MQ nine fourteen
Speaker 22: ten more F eighteen's launch second Strike Package fourteen hundred
Speaker 22: and fifteen strike drones on target. This is when the
Speaker 22: first bombs will definitely drop, pending earlier trigger based targets.
Speaker 22: Fifteen hundred and thirty six F eighteen second strike starts.
Speaker 22: Also first C based tomahawks launched. More to follow per timeline.
Speaker 22: We are currently clean on OPSEC. Godspeed to our warriors.
Speaker 1: Okay, so that's eck Seth and then jd Vance is
Speaker 1: going to respond. But let's just wrap our minds around
Speaker 1: the fact that he's giving a real time cut and
Speaker 1: paste from updates he's receiving from elsewhere to this signal. Chat.
Speaker 1: I will say a prayer for victory VP. All right,
Speaker 1: this is a Waltz again.
Speaker 11: Building collapsed had multiple positive id Pete Carilla, the IC,
Speaker 11: amazing job.
Speaker 1: What jd Vance?
Speaker 11: What typing too fast? The first target? They're top missile guy.
Speaker 11: We had positive idea of him walking into his girlfriend's
Speaker 11: building and it's now collapsed.
Speaker 1: Jd Vance responds, excellent Radcliffe ahead of the CIA response.
Speaker 18: A good start.
Speaker 11: Good job, Pete and your team.
Speaker 1: Okay, so Waltz and others Rubio actually Marco Rubio, yeah,
Speaker 1: Marco Rubio, excuse me, Marco Rubio. Good job Pete and
Speaker 1: your team. Also they got a fist, a fist bump,
Speaker 1: American flag emoji and fire emoji like they're having, you know,
Speaker 1: a chat on Facebook.
Speaker 6: Anyway.
Speaker 1: I think Waltz is going to respond to Marco Rubio.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 1: The team in m al did a great job as well, okay.
Speaker 1: And then Stephen Miller. Great work on how powerful start
Speaker 1: Pete Hegseth.
Speaker 22: Syncom was is on point.
Speaker 7: Great job.
Speaker 22: All more strikes on going for hours tonight and we'll
Speaker 22: provide full initial report tomorrow, but on time, on target,
Speaker 22: and good readouts so far.
Speaker 11: Kudos to all most particularly those in theater and Scentcom
Speaker 11: really great, God bless Okay.
Speaker 1: So that's Susie Wiles all right, which is the Senate
Speaker 1: House chief of staff. Oh excuse me, White House chief
Speaker 1: of Staff, excuse me. And then Witkoff and Stephen Miller
Speaker 1: I think gives prayer and pumping fist emoji and you know,
Speaker 1: strong arm emoji, American flag, American flag, great work and effects.
Speaker 1: That's Tulsi Gabbert great, great work and effects. Anyway, this
Speaker 1: ever since this, my friends, is the chat that was released. Okay,
Speaker 1: just keep in mind this is part of it, all right.
Speaker 1: This is not the whole thing, but this is part
Speaker 1: of the AI read out.
Speaker 6: All right.
Speaker 1: So what did the Atlantic reporter have to say regarding this?
Speaker 3: Uh?
Speaker 6: What did he state?
Speaker 1: Let's go to his audio real fast, because he put
Speaker 1: out a little pre release audio to go along with
Speaker 1: this article where he reprinted, and we just used the
Speaker 1: AI to read it to you.
Speaker 3: Here we go, Well, first of all, we didn't do
Speaker 3: this lightly.
Speaker 23: And all yesterday we were asking our contacts across the
Speaker 23: Administration National Security Complex CIA, D and I, et cetera. Uh,
Speaker 23: do you have any since since the President has declared
Speaker 23: that's unclassified, and since the D and I, since the
Speaker 23: head of the CIA said there's nothing sensitive or nothing classified.
Speaker 3: Uh in these documents. We just want to make sure
Speaker 3: that you don't have.
Speaker 23: Specific objections to to this kind of information, this information
Speaker 23: going out in public.
Speaker 3: The White House issued us.
Speaker 23: An anodyne statement late last night saying they think that
Speaker 23: some of this is sensitive and they'd rather not have
Speaker 23: it out there, but there.
Speaker 3: Was no objections to specific details.
Speaker 23: We did reject one piece of information because we felt
Speaker 23: on our.
Speaker 3: Own that we thought it was best to do when
Speaker 3: the CIA asked.
Speaker 1: All right, so the CIA asked, let's back that up.
Speaker 23: Does but you know, at a certain point, the administration
Speaker 23: is saying that there's nothing classified or secret or sensitive
Speaker 23: in these So at a certain point I just felt,
Speaker 23: you know, let our readers decide for themselves.
Speaker 1: Okay, let the readers decide for themselves, et cetera. But
Speaker 1: the White House gave a mixed statement because last night
Speaker 1: late they decided to say, hey, look there might be
Speaker 1: some sensitive stuff in here, even though all day they
Speaker 1: were saying nothing was classified. What else did Trump have
Speaker 1: to say? On the twenty sixth of March, Let's take
Speaker 1: a listen. I'm gonna go one or two more.
Speaker 19: What if you make of the Vice president's comments that
Speaker 19: he doesn't like failing out the Europeans. Do you agree
Speaker 19: with that?
Speaker 1: Well, I understand where he's coming from.
Speaker 10: The European Union is been treating us very very badly
Speaker 10: in terms of the VAT tax that they charge. They
Speaker 10: charge a tremendous VAT tax, and they don't sell our
Speaker 10: cars in Europe. They don't sell our agriculture in Europe.
Speaker 10: They don't let us do very much. They treat us
Speaker 10: very badly. One of the reasons I'm putting tariffs on
Speaker 10: is that reason. We take millions of their cars BMW, Volkswagen, Mercedes, Benz,
Speaker 10: We take millions and millions of their cars. They take none.
Speaker 10: I don't know if they take any of our cars.
Speaker 10: And they have non monetary tariffs where it's impossible for
Speaker 10: us to sell a car almost in Europe.
Speaker 1: And so I understand what he's saying.
Speaker 10: The same thing with NATA. When I got involved, these
Speaker 10: mostly European countries, as you know, we are twenty eight
Speaker 10: at the time, and only seven were paid, and most
Speaker 10: of them were not paid. Twenty some odd countries were
Speaker 10: not paid or they were substantially less than it's supposed
Speaker 10: to be and the United States was literally making up
Speaker 10: the difference in Europe.
Speaker 1: And it's very unfair. So I understand.
Speaker 10: I didn't know he made that statement, but if he.
Speaker 1: Did, I mean, I'm okay with it.
Speaker 10: It's I complained about it all the time. The European
Speaker 10: Union treats us horribly on trade, and NATO has has
Speaker 10: traded now. I raised a lot of money for NATO
Speaker 10: hundreds of billions of dollars. You were here last week
Speaker 10: when the Secretary General said without Trump they wouldn't be
Speaker 10: in NATO because I got them to pay money.
Speaker 1: It was unfair.
Speaker 10: The United States was paying eighty ninety one hundred percent.
Speaker 1: Okay, So that's all based on the argument about NATO
Speaker 1: and this and that, And really it was during a
Speaker 1: presser about another executive order that he had signed. And
Speaker 1: we're going in this direction because the press is asking
Speaker 1: still about these statements being made, because it is JD.
Speaker 1: Vans who in there is like, I'm tired of European freeloaders.
Speaker 1: You know, we're trying to help them out, and we
Speaker 1: don't know how much of this actually comes to the
Speaker 1: United States. And anyway, I'm thinking these are the insider
Speaker 1: types of cons though that they really would not have
Speaker 1: normally invited a journalist into. But maybe I'm crazy. Maybe,
Speaker 1: So you tell me, guys, because after all, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: leave it in your hands to judge. But Goldberg said
Speaker 1: what he had to say, he released the stuff. He
Speaker 1: was being called a liar, and they were starting to hint,
Speaker 1: at hey, how did this guy even get in on
Speaker 1: our signal?
Speaker 6: Chat.
Speaker 1: Well, it's not secured. And also somebody invited him in there.
Speaker 1: Now there's other issues with this, by the way, for instance,
Speaker 1: at the American people, we're entitled to have them preserve
Speaker 1: all the documentation. You know, there were a lot of
Speaker 1: arguments about this with Trump, with Biden, with Obama, with
Speaker 1: all these different people, where the US is supposed to
Speaker 1: retain records of all this stuff going on, regardless of
Speaker 1: whether they are a team chat you know, on signal,
Speaker 1: or their actual paper memos or their tape recordings. All
Speaker 1: these things are the records that are actually produced in
Speaker 1: government during the operations of government, which is supposed to
Speaker 1: be obformed by the people. So these things you own.
Speaker 1: If you're a US citizen, you have some ownership in
Speaker 1: these things. You own this stuff. It's to be preserved,
Speaker 1: classified or not. It's to be preserved, whether it's shown
Speaker 1: to the public or not. And right now people are
Speaker 1: wondering also, and I know this is going to come
Speaker 1: up soon, how the hell are we going to preserve
Speaker 1: signal chats that disappear like a snapchat. Well, I guess
Speaker 1: we'll find out in the near future when they try
Speaker 1: to retain the records once again. Of this Trump administration.
Speaker 1: But I know I'm a bad guy for even bringing
Speaker 1: it up. But here we are trying to force from
Speaker 1: the hands of the government documents that they voted us
Speaker 1: for a long time regarding the Kennedy assassination, and these
Speaker 1: guys are signal chatting and god knows what else they're doing. Oh,
Speaker 1: it was on my government phone when I got it,
Speaker 1: So you're telling me. You know, the place was dirty
Speaker 1: when I got here. I didn't clean it up. I
Speaker 1: couldn't have thought for myself. Nobody had the idea that
Speaker 1: maybe don't use commercial and you know, typically available communications
Speaker 1: to the general public for our communications. I mean, no skiff,
Speaker 1: no need for any of that. Hillary's emails, Hillary's emails.
Speaker 1: They tried that for a little bit. I don't think
Speaker 1: anybody bit on that. But if you did, remember, I'm
Speaker 1: the one guy who was saying in a media look,
Speaker 1: I don't care about half of this, but the fact
Speaker 1: that she's not preserving the documentation and the fact that
Speaker 1: she's mishandling classified information that in and of itself, I
Speaker 1: don't want to hear about Benghazi and blah blah blah
Speaker 1: and uh and Pizzagate and dah da da da dah
Speaker 1: and all this conspiracy crap blatantly. We knew she mishandled
Speaker 1: classified documents. Nobody dealt with it. Nobody's dealt with it anytime.
Speaker 1: These guys mishandled documents. Now we have people completely completely
Speaker 1: without an.
Speaker 7: It's not a security shoot here, Radio Network.
Speaker 1: Go ahead, right, Well, what do you want to know? Oswell?
Speaker 21: Girlfriends who knew Ruby and Barry weapons.
Speaker 1: I imagine I could claim I have four wheels. It
Speaker 1: doesn't make me a wagon, but okay, was on the building.
Speaker 19: And I'm trying to prevent the murder of John Kennedy.
Speaker 1: Come on, now, has a.
Speaker 10: Real effort on the day of attackination.
Speaker 1: Go to Amazon dot com enter Judith and Baker in
Speaker 1: her own words. You'll get the results for a digital
Speaker 1: copy of a book where Rolph Brown utilizes her own
Speaker 1: words and the known evidence in the case to get
Speaker 1: at Well a different perspective. Let's say you can get
Speaker 1: Judith Barry Baker in her own words from the author himself,
Speaker 1: signed and if you request it by contracting doctor Brown
Speaker 1: at K I A S J F K at A
Speaker 1: O L dot com. It's a fun book and it
Speaker 1: actually dissects the many, many fantastic claims. Judith very Baker,
Speaker 1: in her own words, thank you.
Speaker 13: For all the great information the US.
Speaker 1: Expressed by caller schools. There anyone else who happens to
Speaker 1: get on the air of Jelly dot com. You not
Speaker 1: necessarily reflected the views of LL dot com or Lly
Speaker 1: and we are not responsible for any stupidity which might
Speaker 1: be student.
Speaker 7: Thank you, dot Com Radio Network.
Speaker 4: Nuclear Holocaust, your dim lemers right think of nuclear weapons
Speaker 4: and other things like let's saying you.
Speaker 19: Had diremimers right.
Speaker 4: Bad things things are geting some bad things. Nuclear Holocaust.
Speaker 3: Revelation through conversation.
Speaker 24: Yo Yola's Doug Campbell, host of the Dallas Action podcast
Speaker 24: presented by Wall Street Window, and you are listening to
Speaker 24: the o' chile effect revelation through Conversation.
Speaker 2: In Denial The Secret Wars with air strikes and Tanks
Speaker 2: by Larryhncock. Secret wars became a staple of US covert
Speaker 2: operations and are still happening today. Larryhancock's book In Denial
Speaker 2: rips the cover off many of them, using new files.
Speaker 2: It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no
Speaker 2: one has ever written about before. It shows why it
Speaker 2: really failed and why the United States did not.
Speaker 25: Learn from it. It also shows why other countries today
Speaker 25: are doing secret operations with more success. This is the
Speaker 25: book that puts what some want to deny into the light.
Speaker 25: In Denial secret wars with air strikes and tanks Larryhancock.
Speaker 25: For more information, go to Larry hyphen Hancock dot com.
Speaker 25: Pick up your copy of In Denial at Amazon dot
Speaker 25: com in digital or physical forms.
Speaker 1: Get ready, so final segment of the ocell Effect here
Speaker 1: on a Thursday, and glad you stuck it out with me. Look,
Speaker 1: I have something to tell you. I want to get
Speaker 1: some more writing. I've gotten some very interesting submissions info
Speaker 1: at Ocelli dot com. If you have some articles that
Speaker 1: are thought provoking, that are a parapolitical, that are political
Speaker 1: in any way, shape or form, and you think nobody
Speaker 1: else will print them, I want to make them part
Speaker 1: of a brand new front page feed that I plan
Speaker 1: to start on April seven of this year. And I've
Speaker 1: already got some submissions in hand. I've rejected eleven articles
Speaker 1: to date and I've accepted three. But please send them
Speaker 1: to me along with you know, contact information, the stuff
Speaker 1: you want to promote. If it's a podcast, if it's
Speaker 1: a book, if it's a blog, I don't care it's
Speaker 1: a YouTube channel, Let's do it because I want to
Speaker 1: get your information out there, especially if it's rarefied and
Speaker 1: of interest. A couple of articles will have to do
Speaker 1: with the JFK assassination, not just the files, but maybe
Speaker 1: some things that people haven't thought about in a while.
Speaker 1: I've got stuff coming up from Larry Hancock and Alex
Speaker 1: Harris in that regard, and a few other authors. Maybe
Speaker 1: a couple of surprises as we go further. Spirituality, the
Speaker 1: current events of the day. Politics, Like I said, culture
Speaker 1: in any way, shape or form, anti culture, bring it
Speaker 1: to me because it all counts. Anyway. What is the
Speaker 1: theme for today, besides the signal and the noise? How
Speaker 1: do you separate the real important stuff from the noise?
Speaker 1: Get the signal out of the noise today? And not
Speaker 1: just with the signal app There's a lot to be
Speaker 1: said about it, Secrecy, the government, why it is we're
Speaker 1: still battling for stuff sixty two years later, you know,
Speaker 1: On and.
Speaker 6: On it goes.
Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, we'll be making announcements about
Speaker 1: JFK Lancer in the upcoming weeks and available on Ground
Speaker 1: zero Radio. It will also be in the show. Notes
Speaker 1: is my interview from last night where I talked about
Speaker 1: some of this stuff as fast as I could and
Speaker 1: even tried to field phone calls on Clyde Lewis's show
Speaker 1: live last night. It was about midnight Eastern. But anyway,
Speaker 1: here we are today, another day, another dollar, and hopefully
Speaker 1: you'll drop a couple in at o'chelly dot com. Got
Speaker 1: some bills coming up, and I got to start saving
Speaker 1: up to go to Dallas where I'll be going by
Speaker 1: myself this year and gonna be working hard for the weekend,
Speaker 1: not getting paid, but working hard for Lancer. So hopefully
Speaker 1: we'll get through some revelations and some conversations there and
Speaker 1: consider this.
Speaker 12: Okay, So heading west, the Grassy Nola is in front
Speaker 12: of Kennedy. The book Depository is behind him. But but
Speaker 12: that makes sense. It can't make sense if the War
Speaker 12: and Commission report for God's sake, but that means the
Speaker 12: government could be right. I finally stopped crying only because
Speaker 12: I started vomiting.
Speaker 5: I know that assassination meant a lot to you.
Speaker 1: Dale.
Speaker 12: I'm sorry, my worldview that's gone. I mean, if they
Speaker 12: were right, about Kennedy. Maybe we really did go to
Speaker 12: the moon?
Speaker 1: Oh man, how can you not know?
Speaker 12: Man?
Speaker 6: It had been something, but no, west Man.
Speaker 12: I didn't have a compass when I was reading the
Speaker 12: freaking book. Boomhauer, which direction are you facing right now?
Speaker 6: Huh?
Speaker 12: Not so easy, is it.
Speaker 1: I'm Magellan.
Speaker 5: You've got other conspiracies, Dale, You got u uh aliens.
Speaker 5: That's right, you got aliens. Why don't you tell us
Speaker 5: about how the aliens are are gonna do things?
Speaker 12: Don't you patronize me?
Speaker 1: Don't you patronize me either. I agree with you Dale
Speaker 1: all the way from the days when I first saw
Speaker 1: him on TV, and this kind of thing happened when
Speaker 1: Dale was a slightly different character and they didn't fully
Speaker 1: develop into the conspiracy theorist of the time. Of course,
Speaker 1: we are the conspiracy theorists of today. If you're listening
Speaker 1: to this show, you're probably guilty of some sort of
Speaker 1: thought crime, even if it's not to be against great
Speaker 1: leader or his portraits hanging up, or his presentation or
Speaker 1: his choice of incompetent excuse me, competent people that are
Speaker 1: there all throughout the Cabinet, State Department, Department of Defense
Speaker 1: DNI et cetera. It is what it is, right, sounds
Speaker 1: like your horn going off?
Speaker 18: Do you really think so, Bill?
Speaker 10: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, you gotta love that King of the Hill Is
Speaker 1: was an amazing piece of work. I was kind of
Speaker 1: sad when it went away, But then again, would it
Speaker 1: survive today? I'm not all that sure. That horn is
Speaker 1: definitely annoying as hell. And this is from one of
Speaker 1: the early episodes.
Speaker 12: Damn it, Hank, You know I can't have loud, sudden
Speaker 12: noises while I'm meditating. I was a nosehair away from
Speaker 12: attaining inner peace.
Speaker 1: Shop. Don't even try to take credit for that.
Speaker 6: It was not done by me.
Speaker 1: It was done through me.
Speaker 5: Fuck, is that shinging noise one of those stealth helicopters
Speaker 5: with computerized noise cancelation capability?
Speaker 1: They're still working the chins out?
Speaker 10: Wow?
Speaker 1: Do you know about stealth health coups.
Speaker 12: Alt dot, conspiracy dot black dot helicopters?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Man, Alt conspiracy black dot helicopters. That was in
Speaker 1: the old days, when the Internet was still in its
Speaker 1: infancy and there wasn't thirty thousand podcasts. It is what
Speaker 1: it is. Government secrecy is what it was, except maybe
Speaker 1: not anymore like I said on Clyde Lewis's show. It's
Speaker 1: a double edged sword where you have people that are
Speaker 1: not even fully aware of what it is they're supposed
Speaker 1: to be holding in the secret memory holes of the
Speaker 1: different agencies. And maybe that'll work to our advantage and
Speaker 1: our disadvantage at the same time, because these people don't
Speaker 1: know what to look for if we ask them for it,
Speaker 1: unless we give them real specific directions to find it.
Speaker 1: And on the other hand, they don't know how to
Speaker 1: keep their own chats from spilling out into the Atlantic
Speaker 1: or who knows. Maybe it's four D chess again, and
Speaker 1: this was an intentional leak in order to show the
Speaker 1: whole world the resolve and the way that we're going
Speaker 1: to handle those freeloaders in Europe. Maybe that was the
Speaker 1: true messaging in the message, or maybe it is what
Speaker 1: did they used to call that the theory of the message,
Speaker 1: the method of the message, the message of the method.
Speaker 1: Either way, separate the signal from the noise as best
Speaker 1: you can, and please keep listening to share the podcast,
Speaker 1: follow me on X do whatever it is you can do,
Speaker 1: drop a donation, send me an article. Info at Ocelli
Speaker 1: dot com is the email address to send me your
Speaker 1: original writings, even if they are short editorials. I'll take them,
Speaker 1: plus podcast ideas, all that stuff. Email it to me,
Speaker 1: message it to me, Do what you can, and let's
Speaker 1: work together to sort our way through this bit of
Speaker 1: disorganized organization and this bit of unreal reality we find
Speaker 1: ourselves in. Separate the signal from the noise. Best you
Speaker 1: can pop
Speaker 2: Sh