Speaker 1: Past past.
Speaker 2: Outputting greatly.
Speaker 3: Maybe baby, I'm right th th thinks thinks think I'm.
Speaker 4: A th th th th thinks.
Speaker 5: Bully Cuba.
Speaker 4: Bully Mexico.
Speaker 5: By Cuba by Mexico. I'mor Iamora.
Speaker 6: Qually let love Love.
Speaker 7: Love iamoraphoned up asphor appair dac.
Speaker 5: Baby baby, im a right, I'm a.
Speaker 8: Right bully Cuba bully Mexico by Cuba by Mexico.
Speaker 1: In the thing a.
Speaker 5: Dame lamor It namor namor It waiting a baby.
Speaker 4: Baby, I'm alad, I'm aladest.
Speaker 1: In testing and testing, takeing buys.
Speaker 5: Coop.
Speaker 6: I may just let this play in the background. Welcome, Welcome, Welcome.
This is Jason Analysis. I am like I'm feeling very
max Headroom today, Matt, Matt Max Headroom today because I'm
reading an amazing book, The Pentagon's Brain, And this was
sent to me by one of the beloved Jays Analysis
listeners about a year ago. I can't turn this down
to just write there we go. But The Pentagon's Brain
an amazing revelatory book, and even though it doesn't explicitly
count in the globalist books series, Hush, Hush Up, Russians,
Hush husher Mouth Russians in the background. It does qualify
in the Globalist Books series, and it qualifies because it
is a book about the rise and history of DARPA.
So we're gonna be talking about tech, we're gonna be
talking about AI, We're gonna be talking about the history
of the Rand Corporation. This book was up for a
Pulitzer for a while, it was a finalist, and because
its mainstream is why we're doing it. And this is
Annie Jacobson's book, Pentagon's Brain, The Uncensored History of DARPA,
America's top secret military research Agency. What is DARPA. Well,
it's where we got the Internet. It's where we got
the Cold War. It's where we got the Rand Corporation.
It's where we got the CIA, it's where we got
mk Ultra. They're all part of the same system. That's
the big revelation here. I kind of like this dark
aesthetic we got going here with with the wargames camera
in the background or screens in the background. I kind
of dig this. It needs some kind of background, some
kind of background SYNTHI SYNTHI stuff, though, And I hope
this isn't I hope this isn't copyright it, so we're
letting some people roll in. We're gonna have about one
hundred so far. That's good for just starting this up
on the spot here and already got some super chats
coming in. Thanks guys, thank you for being the first
super chet cuck Ginger Sensations. Ginger Sensations. We're going to
talk about a I today. So what I thought would
be fun to do is not just me talk about
this big, gigantic book that I've been devouring. Who else
does this for you? Who else devours these giant books
and does book reports book reports for you? Maybe somebody does?
Who's doing your homework for you? The Jaysonnalysis Nerds do
your homework for you. You copy off us and you
turn your tests in to Mark Harmon In Summer School,
I just watched Summer School, so that's on my mind.
And by the way, Summer School is the same plot
as Dangerous Minds. Did you notice that? Did you know?
Why are we so blind to see that the Something's ones?
We something been spending all our lives living in gangst
us paridie. Yes, Dangerous Minds is the same plot. This
is Summer School, but with a bunch of brothers and
and Hispanic gangsters. What do you call the Hispanic gangsters?
The what's the name for Hispanic gangsters? The not crips
and all that, but they have they have a name,
the uh cultural appropriation tolos, Yes, thank you, Dangerous Minds
has Toolos and the brothers and then Summer School is
a bunch of eighties goofballs. So back back before everything
was gangsterized, which by the way, is all out of
the prison economy and the prison industrial complex. So what
you start to see is that they're kind of turning
the country into the model of the private prison industrial complex.
And that's by design because guess what, guess what comes
up in this book? And again I had not read
this until recently, but all of my suspicions, suspicions, suspicions
are confirmed. Everything that I've been telling you was right
for so many years. What do we just see with
with CBS is doing this presentation of Jack Parsons and
Crowley in a series CBS called Strange Angel That right
there is a whole vindication of the entire thesis of
my book Esotery Hollywood, which you can get signed copies
of Jay's analysis, and it proves it proves the thesis
of esotery Hollywood, doesn't. It also proves my specific thesis
about the Alien series because the executive producer of The
Parsons Crowley Show Strange Angel is none other than Ridley Scott.
So that proves, I would say, it suggests that the
Alien series was consciously Crollian.
Speaker 9: Consciously Crullian, consciously consciously consciously consciously consciously Crollian, consciously Brillian.
To do some experimental stuff here. Somebody said that my
my joke Boomer song Boomer tunes. They said it was
experimental almost, So I may just break into song in
the middle of these rants to entertain you.
Speaker 6: Now we're gonna analyze the movie Wargames as well as
this book, because you know, I've been wanting to do
wargames for so long where Ferris Buehler hacks the Pentagon,
Ferris Bueller hacks the Pentagon, and I knew that it
would happen at the right time, and the right time
was when I started dolving into this. I got about
almost halfway. And so since this is like five or
six hundred pages, we're probably gonna break this up into
two different analyzes. But what better time to do the
Pentagon's brain than when I just watched War Games again
and Ali Sheety, Boy does she look rough nowadays? She
has like pill head mouth if you've seen Ali Sheety recently. Yes,
I will analyze toys. What's up with all the Jays
analysis nerds? Like twenty people saying do Robin Williams toys?
I will do that. That is a great one. There's
just so many to do. And I forget consciously Carolean,
not me, by the way, I'm not consciously Crowleian. I'm
saying the Hollywood is and the Alien series was. So
before we get to the meat of the book, we're
gonna talk about the movie, and the thesis is going
to be that, As you know, fans of Jayson Olysis,
you know that the thesis here generally is that the
movies are basically true. Right in a rough set, the
movies are basically true. War Games is roughly true. Obviously,
there's a bunch of ridiculous stuff in War Games. Global
Thermo nuclear war is not really true. I don't buy that.
The Cold War was we were on the brink of
you know, nukes, and if jf K could have got
off the top of Marilyn. If JFK hadn't got off
the top of Marilyn Monroe the right time, we'd all
be nukes because he was humping Marilyn Monroe. The President
was humping Marilyn Monroe. But you're gonna learn some interesting
facts about JFK in this book because he signed off
on some projects. Thank you, Perrin Pelene for in support
of the Global's book series Perine Lance, Peline Lance, Heeline Lance,
the Holy Lance. I get so distracted when I try
to do this. There's so many things to talk about about.
War games is basically true, and we're gonna analyze how
into what degree. So when the movie starts off, if
you recall with this secret underground base that is one
of the ICBM locals, right, Intercontinental Ballistic Mission Missile locals,
And there's a young Michael Madison if you don't recall,
but yes, one of the two soldiers that manns one
of the ICBM nuke sites with the keys is Michael Madson,
a young Michael Madson before Kill Bill, long before Kill Bill.
And this house is a decoy. It's on top of
an underground facility where the ICBMs are, and we learn
that this is a war game, hence war games, and
the threat suddenly goes nuclear. We're oh, we're def con whatever,
we're nukes. We're nuclear, dude, And it's a psychological warfare drill.
We later learned to see if these guys will turn
in the new key. Right now, that's interesting because this
is real. We've seen the military has done these kinds
of things many times. I suspect that that that uh
missile launches, that we're gonna that we're gonna hit the keys, right,
Florida keys, and then come on, I think that was
probably a drill of the of the same sort. But
in the situation here, we have Norrad, all right, which
any Jacobson is going to go into the history of
Norad in her books, So we're gonna get a good
dose of underground bases, which there's not really been a
mainstream publication about the truth of the underground bases that
I'm aware of, except I mean, it's in James Bamford's
Puzzle Palace. Early on he'll talk about the underground bases
and to what degree they're real. He'll talk about Crystal City,
which I think is in DC. It's an entire city underground.
But there's a lot of these and they were all
constructed during the Cold War continuity of government facilities, and
this is all true. They're all real. There are countless
underground bases everywhere. It's not a conspiracy theory. It is
in many ways connected to these doomsday plans and doomsday scenarios.
Now a lot of that is psychological warfare, which we're
going to see in the book. We'll get to that
because she sources you know, the book very well. So far,
I haven't seen anything. I mean again, because it's mainstream,
it's not going to tell you everything, obviously, But as
you know in the globalst book series, we stick with
mainstream books to demonstrate that at everything that we think
is conspiracy is actually real. I'm saying not everything, you
know what I mean, everything in my audiences sense like
we you know, we are I think, very tapped into
approaching these things with a healthy dose of skepticism, ferreting
out true conspiracies from false conspiracies. And so talking about DARPA,
talking about AI, talking about the technocracy, that's something that
obviously we've covered a lot of Jay's analysis because it's
in so many movies and it's very real and that's
what Annie Jacobson is going to show us. And so
her book is basically the reality behind war games. That's
what we're going to be talking about here. And yes,
by the way, I will be taking super chat questions.
Thank you to you guys have already chipped in some
super chests. That's awesome. I didn't even expect that. But
if you want me to read your questions, then definitely
throw me some super shekels. Some mammons, give me the mammons.
So back to the movie. So what they learn in
this drill is that twenty two percent of the soldiers
will not follow the order to nuke everybody, so a
kind of Milgrim experiment on a mass nuclear scale with
Michael Madsen. He won't do it. I guess he didn't
get his orders from Bill to kill Bill, so he
didn't do it. But the guys of the Pentagon basically
learn that most soldiers are not willing to engage in
the use of large skill weapons of mass destruction killing. Now,
this is interesting because there were studies about how many
soldiers a long time ago were willing to shoot other men.
And actually it was a very low percentage, a lot
lower than you would think. A lot of soldiers in
handhand combat out on the front lines tend to run away.
They tend to not be willing to fire on fellow men.
And so this is why the Pentagon developed video games
quite literally. So there's again here with video games. I'm
not oversimplifying it. I realized there's a close connection between
the public and the private sector. There's the partnership that's
always been there, and we see this very clearly with
the Pentagon's relationship to the development of video games. And
that's why rank corporation military indes for complex have always
worked hand in hand with giant tech corporations Lockheed, Boeing,
that's raytheon. These groups essentially do the same stuff still,
and Jacobson's actually gonna show this. We're going to see
just like we saw in the Miles Copeland analysis. Remember
remember I can't believe that video didn't get a million views.
There's so much in that analysis that I did of
Miles Copeland's CIA exploits. He tells you so much, and
nobody wants to listen to the real stuff. I don't
know what I want to listen to. BS I mean again,
who else is reading the entire memoirs of CIA oproduce
Game of Nations and he tells you about them developing
all this computer stuff back in the sixties. Obviously Internet
was developed in the sixties. We all know that we're
going to get into that in the But game theory,
as Miles Copeland talked about, is crucial here, and that's
why video games are essentially just another manifestation of game theory, right,
Nash Beautiful Life, Russell Crowe, game theory, Right, this is
what rand was studying because it's about winning. And guess what,
remember what we saw? Miles Copeland says, yes, actually, the
report from Iron Mountain is true. Now, the actual quote
report from Iron Mountain is a satire book about a
real report of the real report from Iron Mountain. So
they'll take real reports from Iron Mountain, put it into
fiction and it satirizes it. It sounds like the whole
thesis of Jay's analysis and esotery. Hollywood doesn't it, of
course it does. War games, they'll take a real DARPA
tech control grid, a real plan, and they'll put it
into fiction and they'll satirize it. War games. Now, I'm
not telling you that we're going to be nuked by
Russians or any of this nonsense. No, no, no, no.
In fact, even any Jacobson's Book's going to hint at
a lot of the Cold War doesn't really seem to
make a lot of sense. There's a lot of things
that just don't match up. And you know, if you
heard the recent interview that I did with Mark Hackard
on Victor Rothschild as a Soviet agent, then that begins
to explain the playing both sides, right, the duality the
dialectics of the Cold War as a managed conflict at
the meta level. All right, that's not to say that
there weren't guys on the ground, guys in the operations
and the Black ops and all this, that were truly
sincerely fighting the Commies. Of course they were, And there
were truly Viet Cong getting sprayed with Kim trails. What, yes,
Viet Kong getting sprayed with Kim trails. I don't know
if any Jacobson is aware of it, but her book
actually defends improves Kim trails. Thought that was a crazy
conspiracy theory. Well here's a mainstream book talking about it.
Oh they just well, I'm gonna save that. I'm not
gonna I'm not gonna spoil that yet, so hey, great
comment there, Umbrella Corporation. Yes, in fact, I just gave
my talk at a V nine Alternative View nine in
the UK. That's why I went to the UK. It
was a lot of fun. If you guys have followed
the streams, you know that now Ian Crane who puts
on AV nine.
Speaker 5: He owns the.
Speaker 6: The talks, the presentations and he sells them of course
on DVD. So if you want my presentation, you can
buy that DVD from Ian Crane at his website for
the next year or so, and then after a year,
Ian Crane puts the full talk on his YouTube channel.
So there's a lot of good talks, by the way,
on his channel because I actually watched some of the
older AV present presenters because it was some of the
same people that were there this year. Really really good
stuff though, like really in depth, especially about AI and transhumanism,
and my talk was actually on Hollywood transhumanism and war
games made up a part of that. And I thank
you their commenter that you mentioned. I've got my shades on.
Oh well, my son Glass at Night rend renovated the dust. Yes,
the Umbrella Corporation is real. What is the Umbrella Corporation?
It is DARPA, CIA, Pentagon, Rand, mil tur Industrial Complex.
Because theyre all are the same people, Okay, don't think
of these things as like different different entities. They really
all serve the same functions. And again remember if you
want your questions read, you can donate with the super
chat function. Doesn't have to be a lot of money.
I would appreciate it. It helps me out, and I
am yes, back in the saddle, back in the AI saddle.
Like that cartoon remember that cartoons Silver, Silver, Silver something.
There was an eighties cartoon with AI robot cowboys in space,
very very bizarre. May remember that anyway. But I get
so way off track here this. I love this stream
of consciousness style though that's just that's my style, bro.
This is just stream dude. We're live streaming my live
stream of consciousness. And but what I was getting at
was that it actually is true that the video game
first person shooters were actually designed to help people develop
more of a trigger finger, a more ready willingness to
shoot fellow men. And Bravestar, thank you, Sean, you got it. Bravestar.
I remember watching that before dreading going to school. At
the time, my dad was in boot camp and we
lived in Chicago, and it was freaking cold as heck
and I hated it in Chicago, and I would have
to wake up in the morning at like five am,
and I'd get to watch a Brave Star in the morning,
and that dumbass clown, I don't know, my mine's not
working tonight, that clown that everybody watched for Boso Boso
and Bravestar would come on Bravestar. I thought was cool, Boso.
I don't know. Something freaking weird about Boso. What's up, Aaron?
You live in Chicago. I lived in Waukegan, so technically
I don't guess it was Chicago, but it was. It
was in the same vicinity, but it was. It was
a nightmare. But we're way off topic here. Bravestar Pentagon
video games segues to computers very well because this, this
this show, this this movie encapsulates so many different ideas
and even mass depopulation in eugenics. Believe it or not,
this actually comes up because the background scientist who develops
the AI he eventually adopts this genocidal you know Kessler,
bertrand Russell, you know HG. Well's role society Malthusian attitude,
and that's mentioned in the movies. It's kind of blowing
me away that all of this is in this movie.
But we'll get that in a minute. But I just
wanted to make the point though, that this movie even
shows the intimate connection between the Pentagon, DARPA and video games.
This is in wargames.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 6: I didn't figure this out until very recently. There's some
old videos actually on YouTube that are pretty good. I've
got saved like way back in my liked videos about
Pentagon video game connections. They're like ten minute videos. You
could probably find them. And so I didn't learn about
that until like three or four years ago. And here
it is. Then you go back and you watch war
games and you realize that's the whole point of this
freaking movie, is that Ferris Bueller hack into the Pentagon
because he is so good at computer games. And we
will eventually take take on another movie from the eighties
that was in the same vein that has the same idea, Starfighter.
Is that it Starfighter. My mind is just not working today.
I don't know, Like, I can't recall anything star Fighter
where the guy I think that's it, where the guy
plays the video games and then he yeah, that's it.
The last Starfighter. He does so good on video games
that the Shadow Space government comes and recruits him to
fly the video game drone type systems and to kill
the bad guys. Well, what does that sound like? Preparation
for drone warfare? And guess what drone warfare comes out
of Vietnam and the Phoenix program and the Kim programs
of Vietnam. All of the conspiracies that I have talked
about are vindicated in these books and in this movie.
And we will be by the way, talking about a
lot of this in esoteric Hollywood too, So there will
be a significant section of that book towards the end
of the book Hollywood Transhumanism, we will be delving into
all this. So Matthew Broderick, interestingly, is not just Ferris Bueller.
He is also as I think of it, I can't
recall another film where we have the archetype, the new archetype,
the creation of this new archetype here in nineteen eighty
three of The Teen Hacker, Right, remember when we did Hackers,
that ridiculous movie with Angelina Jolie and Matthew Lillard and
Prodigy playing throughout the entire movie. If you haven't listened
to that analysis, it's pretty fun. Go listen to that
is the one I did with Black Panther and Red
Sparrow Cold War stuff again, Red Sparrow Hackers, Well, war Games,
Cold War stuff again. And Matthew Broderick is the archetype
of the teen hacker. Like he's in his room and
he's dialing in with like a like a like a
rotary dial modem to the Pentagon, which is ridiculous. But
by the way, who knew about modems in the eighties,
very few people, Right, What is the let's see the
old Internet, the old internet hookup sound? Remember this flashback
hackers War Games? Whoa dude, man, you listen to that
shit now and it's like that is kind of eerie, dude.
It's like it sounds like aliens, like you know, AI
aliens talking to one another or something. That's a you
could invent some conspiracy about that. It would be the
next big conspiracy straight out of you know, co Intel
pro or whoever designs flat Earth and all that bullshit,
like the the old original dial up sounds. Are aliens
alien AI communicating called George Norri? Where is George? Get
me on coast to coast right now, because I've invented
the hottest frickin' conspiracy theory. Yes, dubstep by the way,
you said dubstep there, truthy, dubstep is the language of
the AI aliens. Damn, that's how you create fake Pentagon
cast Sunstein cognitive infiltration conspiracy theories. They should hire me.
I could come up with better. I'm joking, but I
could definitely come up with something better than that Cony
twenty twelve campaign. Remember that that was hilarious. So Matthew
Broderick is the archetype of the hacker, and can anybody
in the chat, by the way, correct me. Here's challenge,
chat challenge, don't dun't duh? I have a little segment here,
chat challenge. Can you think of an earlier archetype in
movies of eighteen hacker real genius? Uh uh, that's after
eighty three, so real genius won't count. They're not exactly hackers.
Either of Kilmer is not a hacker and real genius
does anybody have any suggestions an earlier I think, yes,
flat Earth is a cast sunseteing cognitive infiltration thing, now
that I think about it, Mandela effect that one. What's
another stupid one where I was just talking about this
earlier today, Like the three really stupid popular conspiracy theories,
they've got to be, you know, thought thought up in
some cast Sunstein think tank group. I don't know, I
don't remember.
Speaker 5: But.
Speaker 6: Can you name an older uh, you know what. Cloak
and Dagger is a good one. It's obscure, Dabney Coleman boom.
I know what you're thinking there, But is it? Is
it older than eighty three? Cloaking? By the way, Cloak
and Dagger is awful as a freaking movie.
Speaker 5: Dude.
Speaker 6: That movie is fucking terrible. Dude. It's so it's so shitty. Nope, good,
good try there, truth Seeker. But Cloaking Dagger is nineteen
eighty four, and War Games is nineteen eighty three. Terminator two,
Edward Furlong T two. T two is not T two
is like what eighty five eighty six? Terminator two. I'm
getting some tech company. No Terminator two. No Terminator two
is actually that's gonna be like eighty seven, dude, now
that I think about it, now ninety one, get out
of here, dude, Terminator two ninety one. So let's say Tron.
Is it a hacker movie? Kind of? It would beat
war games. It's kind of a hacker movie. But I
don't get the teen hacker archetype out of Tron. That's
a good guess, though, Goonies there's no hackers and goonies, dude,
what you're talking about. Data is data hacker. Yeah, you
could count data as a hacker, but Goonies is after
nineteen eighty three? Do you guys are going crazy? Jay
is better than Ran Corporation. I hope, so hope. So
I cracked the code? So do you want to play
a gang?
Speaker 5: Do you want to play a game?
Speaker 6: I'm trying to do my robot alien AI voice the
conversation Gene Hackman, that is a good by the way,
you know, if there if there was, if there are,
if they're a if they're as, if there is a
Hollywood The Coded season two. I already wrote that episode
for the conversation. We have a whole Gene Hackman the
Conversation episode ready to go, But I don't know if
there's going to be a hollywoody coded season two thoughts. Yes,
tron thoughts, trad thoughts. What about tron thoughts? That's virtual thoughts.
By the way, what's a tron thought? A virtual thought?
So it so nobody's beat me yet? Has anybody come
up with a Bowman doesn't count as a teenage hacker?
Speaker 5: Dude?
Speaker 6: Bowman is a bot?
Speaker 5: Is he would?
Speaker 6: Do we even know if he's a teenager? There's no
teenage hackers and they live. That doesn't work thermites. It's
not a movie. The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes? I remember
that that? Does that have a teen hacker in it?
A Computer War Tennis Shoes nineteen sixty nine? Oh yeah,
that's that one with Kurt Russell. Or it's like a
dizzy old Disney Kurt Russell movie. Is he a hacker?
Dexter Riley Kurt Russell? Or should I say, Jack Burton,
you find yourself on a dark and stormy night. Your
back's against the wall. Some guys got you against the wall.
He says.
Speaker 1: Eh.
Speaker 6: He says, hey, Jack, if you paid your dues, tell him, yeah,
I paid my dues checks in the mail. It's my
Jack Burton for you. Kurt Russell cannot afford to buy
a computer. The students persuade him to. They use a
gambling ring for their operations. Is he a hacker? Though,
we don't know if he's a hacker, he wins a prize. Okay,
you might. You might have me on the computer who
wore tennis shoes if you can show that he's a hacker.
Short circuit, Yeah, but short Circuit is after war Games.
I can do a perfect Johnny five, by the way, ue,
Oh my gosh. By the way, Short Circuit actually does
have some weird esoteric stuff in it. Really shitty movie,
but shitty in the fun way. What does he called
that chick? I forget Ali Sheety's character in that because
I could do the voice perfect. What is her name? Uh,
my mind just doesn't work tonight. Her name Astoria, by
the way, which is interesting because that's Google, that's Goony's territory. Uh, Stephanie,
Stephanie wee. That's exactly how Johnny five talks.
Speaker 5: Man.
Speaker 6: He's like a retarded robot too. He's like a retard retardrobot. Uh,
we're way off of how are we talking about short circuitar?
I was we were having fun. We're having fun trying
to come up with an older teenage hacker brain scan
with Edward Furlong. Come on, dude, you gotta cut lawnmower man.
This is nineteen eighty three movie. You guys are telling
me nineties movies. I want a teen hacker prior to
eighty three. That's the challenge. And I'm thinking he might
have me with the computer who wore tennis shoes, but
I don't. I can't remember if he's if he's a
hacker or not. You want to fight me in real life? Why?
Speaker 4: Why?
Speaker 6: Say? Gal see why glaucoma? Glaucoma? Mccon, Do you want
to fight me? If you got glow kalma dog, You're
gonna lose a fight. Stupid question. Move on, it's not
a stupid question. We're having fun because it's actually relevant
to predictive programming because if you listen to the hacker analysis,
the idea of the teen hacker was prepping you for
the Internet. It was prepping that younger generation who is
going to live into the stage in which the internet
would become you know, everywhere it would be. We would
see total saturation of the net. This is what ARPA
and DARPA planned. So don't tell me that it's a
stupid question. It's not weird. Science is after, it's eighty
five or six, so that doesn't count. It's after. So
it does matter when a movie puts in the first
archetypal type character like this, And so if we don't
count Kurt Russell, then I think Wargames counts. And Wargames
was a mediocre success. I think it was a twelve
million dollar budget. I don't think it was a flop.
I haven't been able to figure out what it actually
made at the box office. But anyway, they knew what
they were doing. And what I'm trying to explain to
you is that if you can find you can actually
go watch old episodes of Airwolf. When I was a kid,
I remember watching Airwolf. There's Airwolf clips where he talks
about the Internet and hooking up to the Internet. Now,
Airwolf was quite obviously some kind of you know, Pentagon
consulted show, Blackhawks and all that. There's other shows where
you know, you have Kit, right, night Rider. Kit is
basically an AI car, and there's probably night Rider episodes
about the Internet and nothing surprises him anymore. That people
found NSA being exposed in Rockford Files, say in Rockford
Files that is insane. I think it was Chris and
John put that on Hoaxbusters back in the day. But
you can probably find that video on YouTube. Look up
Rockford files and the NSA. Now again, this is where's
no way this is coincidence. This is just insane. So
whoever said stupid question get out here, You're a stupid question.
Your face is a stupid question. The more sophisticated software,
which is interesting, there's this line that Ferris Buehler has.
He says, the more sophisticated software is the software that's
able to present itself as helping you more. How can
I help you? And it was kind of an innocuous line,
but as I thought about it, yes, that actually makes
perfect sense because all of this ai that we're going
to be sold, that we're going to be conditioned into,
which is what we're already seeing was Google Voice and
Alexa and all this crap in your house, and eventually
it's going to be a little rolling around Alexa that
comes to different rooms and brings you your beers or whatever,
all of which we're in eighties movies as well. Go
watch Space Camp, which is terrible, but you can. There's
a great line about Kate Capshaw's boosters. That's one of
the worst stupid lines that I remember from Space Camp.
But you see a young Joaquin Phoenix in Space Camp,
and guess what hit The titles credit his name as Leif.
He's titled in the credits as Leaf Phoenix, so I
guess he changed his name to Joaquin. I don't know,
but in Space Camp Joaquin is a young, annoying, chunky
kid called Leaf Phoenix. But we're told in wargames that
the more sophisticated AI is the one that's able to
service you better. And that's what we're gonna start getting
with these AI programs that are rolled out. In my
talk that I did at AV nine, I did some
research on this and actually found some of the more
recent bots that they're rolling out, which are quite literally
R two D two style things. It's like Alexa, but
R two D two and he, you know, follows you
around the house. It's like Roombay mixed with R two
D two mixed with Alexa, and he does all kinds
of stuff and oh and by the way, he also
spies on you and keeps up with everything, and it's
going to be tied into insurance. And he's gonna watch you,
and he's gonna watch what you do and how much
you eat and how much energy, how many times you
flesh when you go t t and he's going to
regulate you, and he's going to tattletale on you. You're
gonna have your own little living R two D two spy.
By the way, Jack Attiley said that too. He says,
you will willingly accept all this for convenience, and then
it will be turned on you to imprison you. That's
what Jock Athley says in the book. So gamification is
a big aspect of this movie. I talked about that
in my AB nine talk. If you don't if you're
not familiar with gamification, look it up. Similar to the
idea that Max Kinser Max Kaiser has been talking about gamification, gamification, UH,
gamification is the virtual gulag right, the the rise of
the virtual to replace the real. And this is the
idea of oh in the future, since there will be
the complete saturation of the Internet of things. When you
brush your teeth, your R F I D toothbrush will
register how many points you'll get for brushing your teeth
that day on your insurance, you know, analysis or whatever,
and you'll get three points because you rush your teeth
and you get health points. And then you have your
fitbit chip or whatever that follows. You're ou you did
more walking and exercise, so you get five points for that.
And so everything is going to be registered and regulated
by the AI, tied into your insurance and your medical
the medical industrial complex. Can you believe that that is
the world that we're entering? And that's what they all
talk about. It's in this book, It's in Jock Catelee's book,
all the way back to a she Wells, Bert and
Russell Shape of Things to Come. This was a big
part of my lecture at AB nine. Shape of Things
to Come. It tells it all. I can't stand HG. Wells.
I cannot stand that though. But did you know HG.
Wells was one year off in predicting World War Two?
The Shape of Things to Come was written in nineteen
thirty six, but because he was an in he was
aware of the Royal Society Masonic plans. He knew that
there would be World War two very soon, and he
was only off by one year, so autistic nerds come
up in this now the computer nerds like you, you know,
we said something going back to Disney computer movies. And
by the way, obviously Disney was tied into the Milt
Indocal complex whole time. But we see these these weird
autistic computer geeks in war games and that was something
that I hadn't really noticed in anything that early. Just
throwing that one out there. The autistic eighties nerd makes
his his debut premiere in war Games, and the other
the sort of the fat weird computer nerd, not Matthew
brought and not the autistic one, but the fat nerdy one.
He talks about the backdoor technology into all of the
Pentagon tech and he says that the corporations designed the
back door technology. This is the promise backdoor technology that
we've seen written about publicly in Crossing the Rubicon, the
Michael Ruppert book several chapters on that there. The back
door promise technology was written about in Inslaw's Octopus in
Wire Magazine a long time ago. It's been in many
books since, probably will be in Jacobson's book. I don't know.
I haven't gotten that far yet. I'm only up to
post Vietnam halfway through, so we'll see. But it is
mentioned in wargames that there is backdoor technology, and if
you are wondering what that is, watch the movie Sneakers
with Robert Rifford, because that is nineteen ninety and it
talks about the nssay's backdoor technology.
Speaker 5: So we have.
Speaker 6: The goal of creating self learning AI is essentially what
the scientist the Falcon character who's the scientist. He designed
this this AI that can supposedly think, which is not thinking.
But if you're a reductionistic materialist, you can just call
any sort of process that goes on thinking, which is ridiculous.
Just redefine the words, the same thing that the social
justice warriors do to vindicate changing your biological sex. Just
redefine the words and all of them. So I, by
the way, that's why identified as a boomer. You could
identify as anything. I self identify as a boomer now
and it's agist. If you don't accept, then I'm a boomer.
So the movie is again a Cold War sye op.
Even references Disney in the movie. By the way, I
don't think it's a Disney film. Off the top of
my head, I'm not sure, but they this is a
funny thing too. This port's great. So when they realize
that the Pentagon has been hacked just for fun by
Matthew Broader at Ferris Bueller, they decide that it can
aid the Cold War narrative, and so they start drawing
up this fictional narrative that he is the Soviet recruit
and they say, oh, everyone who's a disaffected team is
liable to KGP recruitment. So they've feeded into this Cold
War narrative. And really what's going on is that the
ICBMs were hooked up to the Internet. Come on, give
me a break. They're not gonna hook freaking ICBMs up
to the Internet. That would be a totally separate web,
right if there was even such a connecting of those
technologies to some kind of some kind of internet, you know,
there's a whole separate, other government type Internet. They're not
gonna hook the freaking ICBMs up to you know, Ferris
Bueller's dial up. But in the movie they do. And
again it's illustrative because they create the idea that, oh,
throw it into the Cold War narrative, he's a Soviet recruit,
how ridiculous and ironically in the film, though, you have
another prevalent theme in the eighties, which is that the
kids know best. This is something if you go and
listen to a great podcast I did with John Adams
called Occult Eighties and Comedy Arcana. A couple of years ago.
We did a really cool podcast. It's on YouTube, and
we talked about eighties films and trends in eighties films,
because a lot of the trends in the eighties films
are actually selling ideas and preparing that generation for the
changes to come. And one of those trends was not
just the rebellious team that's been in everything, but the
idea that the teens actually know way more than the adults. Now,
I'm sure there were some movie prior to the eighties
that did this, but it's everywhere in eighties movies constantly. Right,
the teens know it all right. They freaking solve the
giant Masonic labyrinth of the goony you know, one Eyed
Willie puzzle, and none of the adults have any clue
what's going on. They were totally oblivious. But the goonies
can solve the giant Masonic riddle, and by the way,
it is a Masonic riddle read my Goonies analysis. It's
also a Route Goldberg machine. So the last thing I
wanted to mention about the scientist character in wargames is
that he becomes a radical naturalistic, nihilistic, Darwinistic material Malthusian
and he says, I finally realized that since the AI
that we're coming up with is just a product of evolution,
it's superior to us, supposedly, and therefore it can kill us.
And so since it's the next stage in evolution, we
should worship it. And it's destined to wipe out humanity.
You see. So this is really the actual mindset of
the global elite, quite literally, the gollum that they're creating.
And yes, jo Atli calls it a gollum. The global
brain is just like the synthetic global fake economy based
on Fiat debt. It's a gollum. It's not real, but
everybody thinks it's real. The global brain is not a
real brain, but everybody thinks it's real because they are.
They believe the propaganda that an advanced computer is no
different than the rand processes that evolved to be the
human mind. It's all just random, and that's what the
Malthusian scientist behind the AI that he's developed, that's what
he believes. And he says, I'm just being Darwinian, and
he says, there's a great line. He says, I realized
that since death is natural, it's only natural that the
AI eventually leads to global thermonuclear war and we all
just die off. The human species, he says, is destined
to be extinct and replaced by butts. Now what there's
I mean that is so absurd that Okay, I'm not
going to go into all this, but go listen to
the talk on Kessler goes to the Machine. You have
to listen to my full Kessler talk because I completely
dissect this and deconstruct it. And listen to my talk
with Tim Kelly about Luciferianism, HG. Wells and Arthur Kessler
the death cult, because I dict I dissect it there,
I think completely. I think that's one of the better
talks I've ever done, actually, is the Luciferian death cult talk,
because that really sums it all up. And that's in
this movie. This guy is like a Luciferian death cultist.
And who else better to convince him of the error
of his ways than Ferris Bueller, And of course Ferris
Bueller with Ali Sheety, convinces him to become a kid again,
to become a GOONI and they outwit both the Pentagon
Norad Cheyenne Mountain Complex and Dabney Coleman. So there you know,
Cloak and Dagger again with Dabney Coleman. So didn a
she Wells predict nineteen forty no forty four forty five?
He's off. I think one year of forty four forty five.
I don't, I forget. I get mixed up on the
exact date. I was so tired after the playing flight
when I was reading all that, I had to do
my talk at nine in the morning. So after a
nine hour flight and then like two days later, you
do a.
Speaker 5: You do a.
Speaker 6: Nine am talk. It's it's pretty pretty intense. It was
very challenging, but it was fun. It was worth it.
So war Games, I don't know, I don't know, what
do you guys think? That's my analysis of war games,
And of course you know the good guys winning war games.
It's not really much else to be said about that movie.
But there was much more going on than I expected.
And actually it had been probably three years since I
watched war games, and I thought, oh, I've got all
that knocked out everything in war games already know anything. No,
I was wrong. There was a lot more in war
games than I expected. I don't know, it's just crazy.
What do you guys think? Is it crazy? Glaucoma theo
Glaucoma says, go on JF show. I can't go on
shows unless I'm invited on. Dude. Oh but by the way, yes,
I will be going on The Worst Be Live. Worst
Key may be attempting to get that rev back up again.
He's taken a little bit of a break and done.
Kumite Andy is going to rev up Worsku Live and
we're gonna I'm gonna sit in for a guest co
hosting session. We're gonna test the water, see how it goes,
see if people like it. And what better way to
test this than we was canes and shit debate. We
was canes and shit. That's what we're gonna do. Now,
it's not me debating. I'm going to be there to
help facilitate, co host and give smart ass comments and
I'm sure there will be quite a few laughs. In
a we was Kayn's debate between radio and Yes, this
black dude's I'm not just some black dudes. I'm just
saying this black dude spells it r A I d
io ry radio one. Does he think that's how radio spelled?
Is he referring to Cuba Gooding Junior in radio? I
don't know. H probably ask him those things. In fact,
I might even do this co hosting gig episode as
Koopa Trufa right? Would would this guy like lose his
mind if I did that? It would be really funny
if I did that though. So I'm gonna be on
Worski Live Friday.
Speaker 5: Here.
Speaker 6: This guy is getting mad.
Speaker 1: Bro.
Speaker 6: My name is the Glaalcan glaucun Khan. It's based on
Glaucon from the Republic. Yeah. I have a whole talk
on Plato's Republic. I know who Glaucon is. It's just
a joke, dude. You gotta you gotta roll with it. Man.
When I'm when I'm on pair, you know, talking smack,
being goofy, I'm gonna call you Glaucoma. I should be.
I should go on there and be like, hey, man,
you talking about we with Kings. What you think about
glaucoma from the Republic? Who your favorite character is from Republic?
You like glaucoma? Bro, you smoke them spliffs, you get
rid of that glaucoma. But Yeah, we're gonna be talking
we with. It's gonna be hilarious. I'm gonna ask It's
not gonna just be dumb either, by the way, I'm
gonna actually ask serious questions. Uh, We're gonna We're gonna
because I believe that the we was King's Black Israelite nonsense,
which is so stupid. Come that's so, that's like a
co intel pro type thing too, right. I mean every
group has their own little kind of mythological tailor especially
tailored uh God myth for them, and Nazism is that
it's a specially tailored God myth made up by Alfred
Rosenberg and other people. It's not real. The Nazi mythos
is not true. If you're not aware of that, I
can't help you. So it's no different than the mythos
that's crafted and given to black people of we are superior. Right.
Example of this is the mythos for blacks in Nation
of Islam. Go listen to my interview with James Kelly
on Nation of Islam, and we dissect that perfectly there
and guess what, it's the same, the tailored mythology that
you're a special God race and that white devils that's
literally where it comes from Nation of Islam, white devil stuff,
Farah Khan and Elijah Mohammad. It's obviously a completely made up,
fake social engineering tool, just as dumb as scientology and
all the other ones. And it's just as made up
as the Nazi mythos of the Teutonic God people and
whatever bull crap from Helena Blovatski and her made up
cycles of ancient at Antis and all that crap diarism
god myth But it's the same god mythos, and they
all tell you that join our cult and you your race,
your genetic lineage is the true God race. It's it's ridiculous.
Come on, Jesus, No, he was not an Arian. Oh
my gosh, don't be so gullible, dude, Like Jesus was
an Israelite. That is a that's central to the message
of the Gospel. So the Christian identity, oh yeah, Christian identity,
that's another great example of this, just as stupid British,
British Israelite, just as preposterous. It's the same domb heresy
over and over and over and over. Go read the
Book of Isaiah and then listen to my talk on
the Gospel and the Gospels and their veracity in the
Book of Mark that's had like ten thousand views. Go
watch that and you'll see that the Book of Isaiah
shows that the fulfillment of all the prophecies is in
Christ and it's not some freakin made up tribe of
Mormon weirdos that floated over here that's only recorded in
the Book of Mormon. Don't be so gullible, dude, that's
not true. That's for retards. I hope that was a joke.
Thank you, John. Yes, I was praying. I was like,
please do not let this be a real. Jesus was
an Aryan person. But here's a weird thing. There's an
episcopal cathedral in Memphis by this weird artist. I can't
remember his name, but he designed these really kind of
creepy paintings at this episcopal cathedral, and one of the
paintings has the ary in Jesus, which is very bizarre.
And then there's another painting in that same cathedral of
the art the art change Old Michael with a scroll
that says E equals mc square. Just completely ridiculous and bizarre.
But that artist who is obviously a Hermeticist because in
his paintings in this cathedral. You can look it up.
Look up the episcopal some episcopal cathedral in Memphis, probably
the biggest one, and it has all this creeper art
in it, and it's famous guy. You'll find his stuff.
There's a famous painting of Augustine and there being baptized.
Then you read about this guy and it's hermetic stuff
and guess what he painted a bunch of stuff for
Pius the twelfth. Yes, Hermeticism alive and well in the Vatican.
And by the way, that is not proper iconography. Jesus
is Hebrew for a reason, and he looks the same
in Orthodox icons because Jesus wasn't Asian Jesus. Jesus wasn't
Black Jesus. Right, Roman Catholics just go crazy with this
and paint Asian Jesus. That's gnostic, dude. Jesus came in
space and time as a Hebrew and that's why orthodox
icons always paint him the same way, and that's why
it leads to gnostic heresy and the denial of our
actual genetic lineages. Right to go into these dumb heresies
and to try to say Jesus was a chink, Jesus
was an Asian, Jesus was a black man. No, he wasn't.
I mean, it's not even it's not even worth refuting.
It's so stupid. Jay. Thank you so much for what
you do. Randy, Thank you, Randy Churchill. I've learned a
lot about Orthodoxy from you. I appreciate how you break
down things and explain them. God bless thank you, Randy,
God bless you. And guess what wasn't my analysis of
Jordan Peterson correct? Yes it was? And how many hundreds
and hundreds of Jordan Peterson people got furious at me
and went off on me and sent me a lot
of hate mail. It's okay, I don't care. And guess
what I was right? Wasn't it? Because Jordan Peterson's worldview
is completely incoherent and it shouldn't be that difficult to
figure out. It's not that hard to figure out that
all these things don't mesh together. Now, maybe Jordan Peterson
is on a journey I hope, so, I hope he
comes our way. He's obviously interested in Orthodoxy. He's become
very popular. I don't think I think he's you know,
several grades above my level of popularity. So I don't
have the ability to set up anything with Jordan Peterson.
A couple of people have tried it. I don't think
that's gover gonna happen whatever, you know, I'm not worried
about it. I'm not here to cow tell to somebody
because they're famous. And I wasn't mean to him. I
was fair to him. You know. My hope is that
Jordan Peterson converts to Orthodoxy. Obviously, the point, the point
in me making a video critiquing classical liberalism and pointing
out how it's incompatible with orthodox theology is so that
if per chance Jordan Peterson watched that video, he would
see my argumentation as solid. But turns out Jordan Peterson
has worked on UN panels on biodiversity and sustainability, which
translated into common parlance, is the population. Now maybe that
was in the past. Maybe Jordan Peterson no longer believes that.
I don't know We'll have to see. We'll see what
Jordan Peterson says. But I mean, if we're just gonna
to get more Darwin Freud and Carl Young, sorry fail
Darwin Freud, kral Young. There there might be some insight.
There's insights in Crawl Young. I don't mind Crawl Young,
but it's not gonna get us to where we want
to go.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 6: And as for Vox Day, I have seen a couple
of the vox Day videos critiquing Jordan Peterson. There was
a common listener who has claims that he's messaged box
Day in Box Day says he is too busy to
do a conversation. So, uh, that wasn't my initiative. That
was a common listener trying to set that up. That's
usually how things get set up, as common listeners set
things up. But uh, you know, I don't I don't
have time to chase down people if they're not interested.
So uh, you know, I was open to a conversation.
He's too busy, that's cool. Maybe maybe one day, I
don't know. If Andy's doing a Thursday show, he said
that he wants to start up Worst Live on Friday,
he may choose to do a Thursday show as well,
but I will be yes. As I said earlier a
few minutes ago, I'll be hosting co hosting as guest
host with Andy the rebooted Worski Live, and we're going
to see how that goes. That'll be Friday at seven
pm Eastern on Andy's channel. So for the second half
of this which will be available tomorrow to Jayson Owl's subscribers,
you can subscribe to Jays Analysis for four ninety five
a month sixty dollars a year, we will be covering
the first chunk of this book. I will give my analysis,
my book report. We'll see that it ties in squarely
with war games, and we'll see what exactly was true.
We're going to see Kim Trails. Kim Trail, how does
that tie into this? Well? It does. And guess what
I posited long ago that this was all connected to
mk Ultra. AI was connected to mk Ultra, which is
connected to Disney, which is connected to the Pentagon, which
is connected to the Military Industrial Complex and the CIA
and DARPA, and it's all the same thing. It's all
the same beast. I positive that in my book. It's
in my book. A lot of people bitted me about that.
A lot of people said, you're crazy, You're a conspiracy theory.
Oh oh oh oh, it's in this mainstream book. But
you see, I'm not an acceptable mainstream person, so I'm
not gonna get any kind of Pulitzers or anything like that.
Sign with me. I don't care. I have fun doing
what I do. It's much more fun to tell the
truth than it is to try to impress a bunch
of idiot liberal establishment people who hate you. Anyway, Why
would who care? Why would you care about impressing people
that hate you? That's rightdiculous, all right, This is this
is why the people want to adopt Darwinism because they
think that it'll impress all of these these naturalistic, reductionist
atheists to accept your water down, pathetic Christianity, your church unity.
Speaker 5: And it's not.
Speaker 6: It's not. It makes you a clown. So if you
want to send superchats, I do see a lot of
questions there. Hey, sorry, but you know I make money
through doing the superchats, through Jay's analysis, through setting up tutoring.
A lot of people this week have asked about the tutoring. Yes,
it's still going. We can set up the tutoring sessions.
I'm still doing it pretty frequently. I have more time
now than I'm back from the UK and from speaking
at Alternative View. So if you want to set up
some some tutoring sessions to deal with philosophy, theology, history,
church history, biblical theology, whatever you're interested in, we can
do that. Logic Plato's Republic, Glaucon. If you want to
go listen to my Plato talks, I have a I
have eight or nine lectures on the totality of the Republic,
and I have lectures on many of Plato's dialogues. You
can go check those out. Shanna Sawyer, Wow, thank you.
Twenty twenty The day the Earth st is still Latu, Yes, Clatu.
That is a good one. That's one that we definitely
need to get to because it is all about global government, right.
The aliens, the threat of the aliens is going to
lead us to global government. Which again it's not the
aliens are real. It's that in psychological operations, the alien
is tied in the consciousness of the target population to
the outsider. So you'll see in the Cold War, World
War two, and Cold War, the alien threat is usually
connected to something related to the military saving US uh.
And I'm not making this up. This was actually studied
Princeton Radio Research Project. That's there's a section in my
book about E. T. Hadley Cantrell Invaders from Mars that
this is being studied for psychological warfare. So the Orson
Welles stuff, right, that's all studied for the same purposes,
and it's to associate in the target audience's mind the
external threat with the alien as in the German or
the Japanese or the Russian and the Cold War, that's
the alien threat. So if you're terrified in an alien movie, right,
the outside invader invaders from Mars.
Speaker 5: Right.
Speaker 6: By the way, invasion of the body Snatchers is a
Cold Old War sigh out theme comes up in here.
I told you that. And why did I come to
that conclusion Because I watched Twilight Zone, the old episodes,
and I noticed in the credits that it said made
in consultation with the Department of Defense, And I thought,
why were Twilight Zone episodes made in conversation with the
DD And that's because of what I'm telling you. But
thank you, Shauna. We will cover the day the Earth
says still is claw to Christ. I think that that
kind of an alien being is usually they will take
the Christ mythos and they'll transfer it into some kind
of alien type savior all the time. Yeah, you see
that throughout all kinds of stuff. That was a big
thesis of my book. In regard to the Spielberg section,
the Hgul section about aliens self destruct sequence five dollars,
thank you, Sean Shadow, Shadow, Bannadon Shadow, Steve Bannon, jay Is,
Miles Mathews Legit seems like too many brilliant opinions from
one person. I think Miles Mathis goes way overboard with fakery.
I don't. I mean, I read a couple articles four
years ago and I thought, oh, that's interesting, that's interesting,
and then it's like, oh, everything's fake. No, I think
he goes too far. I don't. After a certain point,
I don't remember what I was reading. There was something
I was like, no, this is not fake. I don't
remember exactly what it was. But now I quit paying
attention to Miles Mathis after the third or fourth article.
So I gave him a fair hearing, not saying that
everything he says is wrong. I'm not saying he's a
bad guy. I don't know if it's a sye op.
I just quit paying attention to it. I mean, I
have limited time, you know, I want to focus on
the work I do so a lot of time. I
will give something a kind of a hearing for a
period and I'll be like, Eh, that's not And usually
my intuition is right. When I follow my intuition. I
have pretty attuned census to sensing bullshit because I've had
a lot of bullshit thrown at me over the years.
You finally you get you know, you get pretty adept
at at sensing these things. Doesn't mean I'm infallible. I can.
I make mistakes at times, but you know, I've put
a pretty good number of years now into psyops and
understanding how this stuff works. You can see an entire
shelf here devoted to just that. So I would say
everything fakery, there's a good chance that that's part of that.
Maybe that's what it was. That was the other cast
Sunstein Cognitive Infiltration fake conspiracy theory thesis was Mandela flat
Earth and everything fake. I think those are really good
contenders there for the same psychological Operations Unit wherever that's
coming out of Fort WATCHUGA or wherever. I think Fort
Wachuga does a lot of online sty ops. If I remember,
John Young from Krypton had a talk where he discusses that,
and they will do that. They will. It's a kind
of wargaming, right, They'll come up with these drills, fake
psychological operation scenarios. Remember jade Helm. I told you jade
Helm was fake, and I was right. I told you
there wasn't going to be Marshall Law. I told you
that was a much of watching what you would do
in response to this fake conspiracy theory. Oh guess what
that was at the beginning of war games, wasn't it? Yes?
Speaker 5: It was.
Speaker 6: So Yes. Again, not bragging, but I'm somebody who did
master's work on psychological warfare in fiction. That's what my
master's work is on. So I know this from a
real academic setting. I'm not a bullshitter. I know what
I'm talking about. Anthony. Thank you for your twenty books books,
twenty bucks. I'll take twenty books two and you say,
a new subscriber to your site, love your work. Thank you,
looking forward to hearing more from you. Really appreciated, Anthony.
That's I'm humbled that you would donate Andrew, thank you.
I'm humbled as well. Which globalist book do you recommend
reading first? I get this question a lot. I'm gonna
say the best place to start is you could go
two ways. You could go the quick, easy read route
and do hgu Well's Open Conspiracy, because you could read
that in a day, few hours. It's not a long book,
and you see it all laid out. It's all laid
out right there in one hundred and fifty one hundred
and eighty pages. Maybe that's one route, very quick, very easy.
If you want a little more depth, a little more
meat to start out with, and say a three to
four hundred page book, read Anglo American Establishment by Quickly,
which is a shorter, more precise analysis of the globalists
from the author of Tragian Hope. All right, so when
you've done one of two, or two of those, if
you've done them both, I would say, next, graduate on
to my talks on Tragian Hope. So I covered the
thirteen hundred page tome for you. I read the entire thing,
and I did a series of eight or nine lectures
on that two years ago. Everybody appreciates that. Everybody loves that.
Nobody else has done that. Nobody else has given you
an entire course on the totality of that book. Who
else is reading five hundred page books for you? Who
else read the eight hundred page seven hundred page Malachi
Martin book for you? Who else reads three hundred page
Miles Copeland books for you? I mean, I'm sitting here
surrounded by I'm not bragging. I'm just saying, nobody else
is doing that for you. And yet so many people
just talk shit to me. So many people Jordan Pearson
doesn't do this, does he?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 6: Who has read Ghosts in the Machine and did an
entire book report on it for you? Who did an
entire book report on the Republic? So the shit talkers
talked shit, I think because they can't hang. And that's
just the way. It is not my fault. You can't hang.
Who read this entire tome here, three hundred pages of
Jacques Attalie and his futurist bullshit?
Speaker 5: I did?
Speaker 6: That's you? And who's going to keep reading globless books
one by one by one by one?
Speaker 5: Me?
Speaker 6: I will anyway, thank you. So that's what I would say.
I was Readopen Conspiracy. If you want fiction, read Brave
New World and go listen to my talking Brave New World.
That one's that's pretty bad ass, man. I'm not bragging,
but I think I nailed Brave New World. Really proud
of that. I did that about three years ago. It
was one of the first talks that I did that
really kind of got some traction. I got shared on
a lot of sites. The audio files did so seven, eight,
ten thousand. Back then three years ago. That was like, whoa,
you know, I've never gotten that much on audio back then.
You know, now that's kind of the norm for or YouTube.
So we've had a lot of growth. That's good news.
But read Brave New World if you want to start there.
If you want to start fiction, I'm saying, read Brave
New World and listen to my Brave New World talk.
If you want to start faction, do the HD Wells
or the Quickly. But if you go to my site,
there's a recommended reading list and you can go down
to the Globalist book series, which I need to update.
I haven't updated that in a couple of months. We've
done quite a few Globalist books since then. So thank
you Anthony and Randy Randy Churchill. Have you done a
book review on ancestral Sin. Yes, well it's not a
book review, but I've read a bunch of roman IDEs.
We cover this in a few talks. Now I do
I have an essay. It took me nine years to
solve the problem with roman IDEs, and it ultimately it
wasn't about ancestral Sin. I've read that book twice. I
don't have a talk on it. But what you want
to read is my paper on logos and logo in Romanides.
There I get to the bottom of the issue with
the problem with the Romanides, which is that he does
not believe that there's any analogia at all, and he
thinks that's the Orthodox position. The Orthodox position is not
that there's no analogia. It's that the the analogies that
we make match up to the logoi or to the energies.
The logoi are energies, by the way. That is the
Patristic teaching, and that solves the problem in Romanites. And
if you follow Romanites position out, it means that you
can't speak about God at all, which is dumb and
it's not even worth. It took me nine years dealing
with Romanites disciples to come to that, to solve that
issue of a lot of heat and heartache on the
way to solving that nine year dilemma. But I solved
it in that paper, and it's solved also in Father
Florowsky's essay Creation and Creaturehood. So I understand what you're
saying with ancestral sin, and I know it sounds like
I'm dodging it. But the ultimate issue in Romanites isn't
about ancestral sin. It's about scripture. Because he says that
the way that he formulates his view of ancestral sin
is because he does not believe that scripture can convey
the word of God. And that's because nothing in human
linguistics or symbolism can actually match up to the uncreated.
And this is what he calls the sickness of religion.
There's some truth in that, but it's a perversion because
he goes too far with it, because he mistakenly thinks
that you can't speak about God at all in signs
and symbols because that would be of some version of analogia,
and all sickness of religion is the analogia. Well, guess
what all of the Eastern fathers teach the analogia? So
that's not the sickness of religion. So stop worshiping Romanites.
Romanitest leader out there and cult followers who slavishly follow
this ridiculous view. It's it's ridiculous. I can show you
countless quotes from Basil, from Saint John Damascus, from all
the Eastern Fathers, from Chris st. Gregor Nissa against Unumius
where he talks about analogia and using terms for God,
and they do match up to a sense. They don't
exhaust him, but they do match up in some degree,
not to the essence, but to the energies. We shouldn't
even have to debate this. It makes me really mad
because I spent nine years arguing with somebody who was
a friend of mine over this. Anyway, that's the root
of the Romanies issue, and I'd spent nine years on it.
I know what I'm talking about, and I've read his
other works too, I've read Patristic theology, I've read his
papers on cambc and all that stuff. I get heated.
And when we talk about that. But by the way,
your question about Augustinian original sin, Yes, actually there is
a difference between the Orthodox view of original sin. We
do believe in an ancestral sin. Okay, I'm just saying
that roman IDEs is not the final word on this. Okay.
Romanides is wrong, Augustine is wrong. There's a different, more
accurate Orthodox position. Actually, the Orthodox Study Bible just lays
it out very simple. Early on in the Orthodox Study
Bible there's a discussion of ancestral sin and lays it
out fine, shouldn't be a problem, but we don't accept
the Augustinian view, which unfortunately does still have taints of
Manicheanism in it. Jay, I'm doing an essay on NGO's
and democracy, human rights and asylum. Any light on the matter, Yes,
Listen to the Miles Copeland talk. Listen to last week's
tale Brief History of the Future. Listen to the interview
with to Regnum Arctose where I covered Syria and NGOs.
Those are three talks that you could listen to right
now that deal with that pretty extensively. Jay, I'm reading
a cult Renaissance Church rum by Hoffman. Is a black
pill for the tradcats. Yep, thank god, Finally, this is
what I was hoping for for the last eight years,
ten years, a black pill for the tradcats. Finally, Hoffman
has grasped this. He's one hundred percent right about the
second millennium of Christianity. Unfortunately, he's completely wrong about the
first millennium of Christianity. And I say that not to
be rude. I'm not being mean or offensive to Michael Hoffman.
It's just simply I think that he's not spent a
significant amount of time in the first millennium of the
Church Fathers. I've spent thirteen years in the First Millennium
of the Church Fathers, thousands of pages of that of
those volumes over there, so I know what I'm talking about.
I'm not the most learned church Patristics person in the world.
There are plenty of Patristic scholars out there who know
way more than me.
Speaker 5: But I put a lot of.
Speaker 6: Time into that, and he is absolutely on point in
that second millennium. In fact, I was having a big
sort of quandary as to how do we understand the
issue of the Jesuits, right, because obviously this sort of
Seventh day Adventist Messianic Judaism view of how the Jesuits
control everything in the world, that's really stupid, but it's
partially right, right. I mean, there are influential Jesuits. Jesuits
have had power, So what's the correct view here? And
I think Hoffman finally solved that in that book. Now
he doesn't spend like the majority of the book on Jesuits,
but once you understand what's in that book, then you
can understand how the Jesuits adopt the hermatic perennialism idea
of how to inculturate and do all that stuff.
Speaker 4: Right.
Speaker 6: I'm not saying that every sense of and culturation is wrong.
There's some of this in Orthodoxy. What I'm getting at
is not in culturation being the problem, but rather the
adoption of her meticism. That's the problem, and that is
what happens in Rome. So what Michael Hoppin has finally
figured out is what I figured out. And he's right.
I'm not saying he got this from me. I'm not
saying that at all. I'm just saying that what I
was realizing in James Kelly and in God History and
Dialectic and then when you read Stani Lloyd and you
read Gregory Palamos and you realize their critiques to the
West are true, which leads you directly to Orthodoxy. Obviously,
you start to see the problem in the second millennium
and why the Western Church adopted her meticism and the
theses there are one hundred percent truth. It's right, that's
the solution. These are big questions, big questions that people
have not had answers to for fricking hundreds of years. Man,
this is big stuff and that's the answer. So pretty
amazing that we're seeing this kind of stuff being written
and discovered. We're living at a time of like, you know,
huge revelations, you know, I mean partly through the Internet
and people researching on the internet. So there's a good
side and a bad side to the Internet. But anyway, yes,
it's definitely a black pill for trads and the trad cats. Man, boy,
they get mad at me. I sure don't make the
trads mad, don't know. They get furious and then they
eventually convert. So that's good. I'm glad you're mad, because
you trad cats that are getting mad. I'm hitting on something.
And by the way, I am invited to an informal
trad church. I'm not gonna say which one the Roman
sphere of things, it's an informal invite, and I will
be debating the entire church. There are some prominent people
at this church. I'm not going to say where it is.
It is traditional Roman Catholic church. It's incommunion with Romans,
not Sata. And I'm going to be debating basically the
entire church there on these issues. That's going to be
a lot of fun. Hopefully we can maybe record this
in some way. I don't know if they're going to
be willing to do that. It may be that they're inquiring,
you know, in a more subtle sense. But I'm going
to be a league gate there to basically debate an
entire Roman Catholic church. I actually kind of did this
a couple of years ago. I didn't debate a whole church,
but it's kind of like a whole not a youth group.
Singles Catholic Singles Group invited me to come debate in
a way in Saint Louis. That was a lot of fun.
This is something similar. We'll see what happens this summer.
Shanna says, I listened to a commentary, Yeah, Frank's Romans
feudalism decline. Yeah, I think you know, if you've heard
me do recent interviews where we talk about this, Yeah,
I think there's something to that thesis. Go back to
my old interview with James Kelly Zombie Mass, the Zombie Mass,
and it gets into the Frankish thesis because the Frankish
thesis ties into the changes in the West under the Carolinians. Yep,
Billy Oakuay denying pedal communion. It's not accidental rejection of icons.
It all happens at the same period, eight hundreds Carolinians,
right exactly, and it ties into the Franks. Yep, yep, yep.
It's true. Now I don't know if every aspect of
it's true. Okay, it can be oversimplified a bit, but yes,
there's something to it. And by the way, a great
doctor or a great citation that I saw supporting it
is Saint Phocius has a section I mean, I'm trying
to think of where it is in one of his letters.
Saint Phocius has a section where he talks about the
Frankish monks beginning to spread the filioquay in Orthodox areas. Yeah,
and that to me suggested, yes, there's definitely something to this,
not just being a historic theory, but you can actually
find direct sources back to Phocius. The great discussing this
being spread by Frankish monks. Anyway, well, I'm getting hungry
and we're winding down here. As I said, tomorrow we'll
have part two, which will be Pentagon Brain analysis for
subscribers to Jay's analysis. If anybody else has any questions,
this is the last chance. I'll give it a couple
more minutes. We'll listen to this great goofy song. I
don't even know spiritual Sky, I guess that is who
does this? Some weird Russian or Croatian synth ban from
the eighties. Uh, we'll listen to a little bit of this,
and again, thank you guys. Remember to go to Warski
Screams Queen. I can't say my awes Worski stream Friday night.
It's gonna be a lot of fun. It's gonna be intellectual,
it's gonna be funny, it's gonna be goofy. It's gonna
be dramatic and wild with these we w was Kangs Wakanda.
We're gonna get some people from Wakanda on the stream
and it's gonna be a lot of fun. Check that out.
Any last questions. Don't see any more super chats, So
I guess we'll call it a A A night with
that Croatian synth wave. Thank you guys very much, A
lot of fun. War Games was a lot of fun.
God bless and look for Worsky stream. Hopefully my co
hosting will be worthwhile. It will be a lot of
fun by Kuba and I guess we will call it