Speaker 1: This is Gary and Shannon and you're listening to KFI
Speaker 1: AM six forty, the Gary and Shannon Show on demand
Speaker 1: on the iHeartRadio app. Coming up in the twelve o'clock hour,
Speaker 1: The Story of Ruby, Frankie and her children. Okay, so
Speaker 1: this has been kind of on my peripheral vision radar
Speaker 1: for quite some time, ever since she was arrested in
Speaker 1: August of twenty twenty three, and I kind of didn't
Speaker 1: pay attention to it. And last night I fell into
Speaker 1: the documentary on Hulu about the Devil and the.
Speaker 2: Family Holy Hell.
Speaker 1: And I know that some people have been interested in
Speaker 1: this and have been invested into this, but some people haven't.
Speaker 1: And if you haven't, like myself, or have just kind
Speaker 1: of been aware of it but not all.
Speaker 2: The details, buckle up. It is a wild ride.
Speaker 1: And I was watching a documentary and I meant to
Speaker 1: figure out which one it was before I started talking
Speaker 1: about this, and it did not. But I was totally
Speaker 1: ignorant to the whole world of and family vloggers and
Speaker 1: how popular this was on YouTube, with parents who vlog
Speaker 1: who video their entire lives with their kids, stay at
Speaker 1: home moms, how big of a industry it is in
Speaker 1: terms of product placement and the checks that these families
Speaker 1: get and the horroring out of the children.
Speaker 2: It's awful.
Speaker 1: It is awful, And I think that it's one of
Speaker 1: those things that once you're in it and you see
Speaker 1: all the other people doing it, it's normalized, and you
Speaker 1: think it's normal to broadcast your kids' lives.
Speaker 2: It is not. When you are an outside set of
Speaker 2: eyes looking in. What are you doing?
Speaker 1: You know? And it's all these people who pride themselves
Speaker 1: on being great parents and doing it the right way
Speaker 1: and putting it all on video. Oh my goodness, it
Speaker 1: is a hole to do. And she's the worst out
Speaker 1: of all of them. So we'll get into that, into
Speaker 1: that story coming up in the twelve o'clock hour, and
Speaker 1: maybe dip into it tomorrow for what you watch on Wednesday,
Speaker 1: because I could not pull my eyes away from that
Speaker 1: documentary and also see obviously I'm super into it.
Speaker 2: The husband.
Speaker 1: They do extensive interviews with her husband, who's kind of
Speaker 1: along for the ride and this whole weird roller coaster
Speaker 1: of chronicling their family and their kids growing up. And
Speaker 1: you're watching his interviews the same way you were watching
Speaker 1: the Hidden and Plane side or whatever. That that documentary
Speaker 1: It was that Gary and I watched like eight years
Speaker 1: ago where the guy infiltrates the family and then molests
Speaker 1: the kids and then the parents too, and you're watching
Speaker 1: the interview with the husband and you just want to
Speaker 1: throw stuff at the TV, like, how could you be
Speaker 1: so dumb?
Speaker 2: What are you talking about? You didn't know?
Speaker 1: So anyway, we'll get into that coming up in the
Speaker 1: twelve o'clock hour. Breaking news internationally this hour, Ukrainian President
Speaker 1: Vladimir Zelenski says his country now is willing to move
Speaker 1: forward on that minerals and secure a deal. This was
Speaker 1: the deal that Trump wanted signed before their blow up
Speaker 1: in the Oval office, before Trump kicked them out, before
Speaker 1: they had their joint podium press conference. This is the
Speaker 1: deal that Trump wanted done, and then everything escalated and
Speaker 1: it was a mess. Well. Zelensky took to social media
Speaker 1: today on x our meeting in Washington at the White
Speaker 1: House on Friday, he writes, did not go the way
Speaker 1: it was supposed to be. It's time to make things right.
Speaker 1: We would like future cooperation and communication to be constructive.
Speaker 1: This was a deal that would allow the US to
Speaker 1: tap into Kiev's mineral deposits in exchange for an investment
Speaker 1: fund for reconstruction for Ukrainian development. So basically more money
Speaker 1: for Ukraine to build up the stuff that was shot
Speaker 1: down and we get to tap into their mineral deposits.
Speaker 1: So Zelenski said today, this is kind of the first
Speaker 1: step back to repairing the relateationship. I guess he said
Speaker 1: that his team is ready to work under Trump's strong
Speaker 1: leadership to get a piece that lasts proposing Ukraine and
Speaker 1: Russia both release prisoners and agree to a truce in
Speaker 1: the sky and a truce in the sea immediately, So
Speaker 1: quite the one eighty there, and this is what Trump wanted.
Speaker 1: And as I mentioned yesterday, my whole theory or my
Speaker 1: dad's here, I guess it was of playing the game.
Speaker 1: You're not always going to like who you're talking to
Speaker 1: or who you're dealing with. You got to learn how
Speaker 1: to deal with them on their terms in order to
Speaker 1: get what you want. Zelensky's playing the game here talking
Speaker 1: about Trump's strong leadership, giving him the adoration and the compliments.
Speaker 2: That's what Trump wants.
Speaker 1: And then Zelensky may get what he wants in the
Speaker 1: form of more American dollars because those were put on
Speaker 1: pause overnight as well, So maybe some movement on that front.
Speaker 1: And as John Decker was telling us from the White
Speaker 1: House Press Corps when we talked to him yesterday, this
Speaker 1: was somebody who does not hold a lot of leverage Zelenski,
Speaker 1: So it was only a matter of time before he
Speaker 1: kind of came back and said, all right, I need you,
Speaker 1: I need you. Yes, Europe has done a lot, but
Speaker 1: I do need the United States as well. Target CEO,
Speaker 1: as I mentioned, told CNBC today warning people that you
Speaker 1: may see price increases in the next few days due
Speaker 1: to the tariffs on goods from Mexico Trump excuse me.
Speaker 1: Target apparently relies on Mexico quite a bit during this
Speaker 1: time of year, during the winter, so you're gonna see
Speaker 1: Target at least up their prices on fruits and vegetables
Speaker 1: as soon as this week, avocados, bananas, strawberries in particular.
Speaker 1: All Right, there is a trial going on, a murder
Speaker 1: trial in Los Angeles that I find to be interesting,
Speaker 1: and I thought it found it to be interesting ever
Speaker 1: since the man was arrested for killing his wife back
Speaker 1: in August of twenty twenty three. His name is Jeffrey Ferguson.
Speaker 1: He's seventy four, and his wife's name is Cheryl. Was Cheryl,
Speaker 1: she's sixty five, And he was arrested for shooting and
Speaker 1: killing his wife back in August of twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: And you're saying, wow, this happens.
Speaker 2: All the time.
Speaker 1: Husband and wife get a little homicidy. Yeah, but Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Ferguson is a sitting judge in Orange County. He has
Speaker 1: been for several years. He was actually a former DA
Speaker 1: as well. This is somebody who's spent their life in
Speaker 1: the world of law and order. And Jeffrey Ferguson also
Speaker 1: sent a text message after the shooting moments after. Did
Speaker 1: he send this text message to a friend or a
Speaker 1: family member, No, he kept it within the world of
Speaker 1: law and order. Jeffrey Ferguson sent a text message to
Speaker 1: his bailiff and his clerk just moments after shooting and
Speaker 1: killing his wife Cheryl, and in the text message was
Speaker 1: seemingly a confession. He said, I just lost it, just
Speaker 1: shot my I won't be in tomorrow. I will be
Speaker 1: in custody. I'm so sorry to me. That's open and shut. Hell,
Speaker 1: Judge Jeffrey Ferguson would tell you that's an open and
Speaker 1: shut murder case. But here we are with the case
Speaker 1: move from Orange County to La County because of conflict
Speaker 1: of interest, as you can imagine, and.
Speaker 2: You've got a jury that's deadlocked.
Speaker 1: Well, it's a little bit more nuanced than that, isn't it.
Speaker 1: It's not always just did he shoot his wife? Obviously
Speaker 1: he shot and kills his wife, but what degree of
Speaker 1: the law are you gonna punish him with? And that
Speaker 1: seems to be where they are hung up. Now, let's
Speaker 1: go back to August of twenty twenty three. This was
Speaker 1: an evening when the three Fergusons, mom, dad, and their
Speaker 1: son had gone out to dinner. Their son's name is Philip,
Speaker 1: so it's Jeffrey, Cheryl, and Philip, and they go out
Speaker 1: to dinner.
Speaker 2: But apparently after a couple of.
Speaker 1: Cocktails sharel Ferguson storms out because Jeffrey the judge made
Speaker 1: a hand gesture of some nature of a gun during
Speaker 1: their little spat at the table before she runs out. Now,
Speaker 1: later on in the home, it seems like the fight
Speaker 1: has continued and the judge says that or the son,
Speaker 1: excuse me, says that he heard the judge say something
Speaker 1: to the wife of the effect of, you know, excuse me,
Speaker 1: I have it mixed up.
Speaker 2: Let's rewind.
Speaker 1: The son, Philip, says that he heard the wife, Cheryl, say
Speaker 1: to the judge at some point, and this is after
Speaker 1: they left dinner or the back at home, that the wife
Speaker 1: says something to the effect of, why don't you pull
Speaker 1: a pull point a real gun at me? Because remember
Speaker 1: she got upset during dinner that he poked a fake
Speaker 1: gun like a handgun at her or whatever and pulled
Speaker 1: the trigger. And so they get home things have escalated.
Speaker 1: Why don't you pull point a real gun at me,
Speaker 1: she says, And then the son tells detectives, I turn
Speaker 1: around and there's dad who pulled out a real gun,
Speaker 1: aimed at mom and fired. He testified that Mom's last
Speaker 1: words were he shot me. So he is charged the
Speaker 1: judges with murder sentencing enhancements for the discharge of a
Speaker 1: gun causing death, personal use of a gun.
Speaker 2: That's all irrelevant for our purposes.
Speaker 1: But this is a jury that is at an impasse
Speaker 1: on the second degree murder charge, which is just basically,
Speaker 1: did he act without any with any regard it's basically
Speaker 1: implied malice murder, which means you're acting without conscious regard
Speaker 1: for life.
Speaker 2: It's called conscious disregard for life.
Speaker 1: If you're waving around a gun, if you fire a
Speaker 1: gun into a crowd, you don't mean to kill anybody,
Speaker 1: But you fire a gun into a crowd and you
Speaker 1: kill someone at second degree murder, you know what you're
Speaker 1: doing is likely to end with somebody dying unlawfully that
Speaker 1: second degree murder. Did this guy know that him pulling
Speaker 1: out the gun and firing it at the wife was probably.
Speaker 2: Going to end in her murder?
Speaker 1: Yes, I mean it is a gift that he's only
Speaker 1: on second degree murder and that it's not first degree murder.
Speaker 1: But anyway, that's neither here nor there. It's an absolute
Speaker 1: open and shut case for second degree murder. But the
Speaker 1: jurors kind of, at least some of them, have bought
Speaker 1: into the defense case that it was an accident, that oh,
Speaker 1: the judge had a bad shoulder and he was putting
Speaker 1: the gun away and he accidentally fired it. Well, if
Speaker 1: that was the case, then why does the sun remember
Speaker 1: things so differently? If this was just a oh honey,
Speaker 1: your gun's on the table, will you put it away,
Speaker 1: and he picks it up, and his shoulder hurts and
Speaker 1: he fires it.
Speaker 2: I don't know, It's kind of hard to get over
Speaker 2: the hurdle.
Speaker 1: Also that this gun requires five pounds of pressure to
Speaker 1: depress the trigger. If your shoulders that bad, how are
Speaker 1: you that good with the trigger? I guess one could
Speaker 1: argue as well. But apparently this juror, this jury is
Speaker 1: very emotional. You've got them split on second degree murder.
Speaker 1: Some believe absolutely he acted with implied malice, and then
Speaker 1: some of them that are set on involuntary manslaughter. It
Speaker 1: was an accident. It was a heated argument that resulted
Speaker 1: in her death. Several votes have been taken, but they
Speaker 1: don't know how many. At this point in that jury room,
Speaker 1: there has been some movement on the deadlock. The judge
Speaker 1: in the case, Eleanor Hunter, is trying again this morning
Speaker 1: to bring.
Speaker 2: The jurors back.
Speaker 1: She has said that it's not just the four person
Speaker 1: that can ask questions. Anyone can ask a question, so
Speaker 1: really pulling out all the steps to get a verdict here,
Speaker 1: but the jurors seemed very seemed very confused when it
Speaker 1: comes to some seriously simple questions At least in my opinion,
Speaker 1: like they have questions between what.
Speaker 2: Is a lawful act? What is a lawful act?
Speaker 1: Actually was what one of the jurors aunts asked, and
Speaker 1: the answer was, a lawful act is one that is
Speaker 1: not unlawful. I mean, it was only a matter of
Speaker 1: time untill our juries got completely dumbed down, right. Another
Speaker 1: juror added, can we have some tissues please? So apparently
Speaker 1: things are getting heated in there because you know, they're
Speaker 1: not crying over dead Cheryl. They're probably crying because feelings
Speaker 1: are getting hurt in that jury room. So we'll see
Speaker 1: what happens there. But how much of the fact that
Speaker 1: it's a judge plays into it?
Speaker 2: Is it hard to believe?
Speaker 1: Is that a hurdle to get over that a judge
Speaker 1: would shoot and kill his wife guy who spent thirty
Speaker 1: years on the bench another handful as a DA sending
Speaker 1: that text message, I did it essentially. I just don't
Speaker 1: understand what the problem is in terms of deciding that
Speaker 1: this guy's guilty of murder.
Speaker 2: Oh and the blood alcohol level. I didn't get to
Speaker 2: that one either.
Speaker 1: It looked like he was at about a point one
Speaker 1: seven when that trigger was pulled. I found this story interesting.
Speaker 1: It was in the chronicle, the San Francisco Chronicle this morning,
Speaker 1: and I thought it interesting. I always think it interesting
Speaker 1: when the San Francisco Chronicle or La Times goes after
Speaker 1: local politicians or corruption. I want to give them a
Speaker 1: round of applause, because a lot of times they kind
Speaker 1: of bury their heads in the sand or take the
Speaker 1: sides of the elected officials.
Speaker 2: So good on them.
Speaker 1: This is all about what's called the San Francisco Human
Speaker 1: Rights Commission, the San Francisco Human Rights Commission executive director
Speaker 1: in particular, her name is Cheryl Davis, and last winter
Speaker 1: she was given a gift. Now, Cheryl is the head
Speaker 1: of this Human Rights Commission. It's a nonprofit group and
Speaker 1: it does work and contracting work with the local government
Speaker 1: there in San Francisco. And she was given a gift
Speaker 1: by an entity called the Urban Education Academy.
Speaker 2: What was the gift?
Speaker 1: What we hear about gifts all the time, right, all
Speaker 1: the kickbacks at politicians and the like get whether it's
Speaker 1: sports tickets you know, lak or floor seats tickets to theater,
Speaker 1: expensive dinners, expensive trips, flights, things like that, and it's
Speaker 1: all about horring, right, It's all about what you're going
Speaker 1: to give to the elected officials to get them to
Speaker 1: give you the lucrative contract. And they're more likely to
Speaker 1: give you the contract if you give them stuff because
Speaker 1: they're children and they're whoors at the same time, which
Speaker 1: makes a really uncomfortable situation. But I have never heard
Speaker 1: a more on the nose gift than this one. This
Speaker 1: group gave this Human Rights Commission executive director a large,
Speaker 1: a massive, brightly color portrait of.
Speaker 2: Herself of herself.
Speaker 1: I mean, who is the person that puts a self
Speaker 1: portrait of themselves up? I have heard a story ps
Speaker 1: from a former hairstylist that Anderson Cooper has a massive
Speaker 1: portrait of Gloria Vanderbilt, his mother, framed above his bed.
Speaker 1: How creepy is that you're going to do the dirty
Speaker 1: with Anderson Cooper and you're looking at his mom the
Speaker 1: whole time. I'll just let you sit with that for
Speaker 1: a minute, anyway. But they give her a picture of
Speaker 1: herself and she's almost tearing up last fall when she
Speaker 1: gets this beautiful commissioned portrait.
Speaker 2: And the director of this.
Speaker 1: Academy that's hoping to secure this lucrative contract with San Francisco,
Speaker 1: who signs off of on it. By the way, a
Speaker 1: witch Cheryld Davis that would sign off on this urban
Speaker 1: education academy getting this big contract. They say to her
Speaker 1: at the time, You've done so much for this city,
Speaker 1: so much for this organization with our partnership. Anyway, now
Speaker 1: in papers as all of this is litigated, she's been
Speaker 1: axed by the way. She was making an s ton
Speaker 1: of money. This wasn't the only gift she was getting.
Speaker 1: But as soon as this gift was given to her,
Speaker 1: reporters started digging into her relationships with city contractors, her
Speaker 1: management of this initiative that her friend Mayor London Breed
Speaker 1: hooked her up with. London Breed was the one who
Speaker 1: got rid of her, by the way, because this woman,
Speaker 1: Cheryl Davis, was acting super dirty and getting kickbacks left
Speaker 1: and right. But it was the very portrait of herself
Speaker 1: that was a gift given to her that started the
Speaker 1: ball rolling that led to her demise.
Speaker 2: A portrait of herself.
Speaker 1: I mean, how perfect is that when it comes to
Speaker 1: the narcissism that exists with these people who think they're
Speaker 1: doing the work of the people, when all the while
Speaker 1: they're worried about themselves and what they're getting out of
Speaker 1: the deal. It's never for the childer, and it's never
Speaker 1: for the people and the angelinos. It's for themselves too
Speaker 1: often of the time. And how apropos that what brought
Speaker 1: her down was a gift given to her by this
Speaker 1: entity that wanted a lucrative contract with the city, and
Speaker 1: the gift was the ultimate gift for a narcissist.
Speaker 2: A picture of herself. I love that it is poetic.
Speaker 1: Keana and I were just talking about man cup of
Speaker 1: noodles so hard kind of made a cup of noodles
Speaker 1: and we're just sitting here looking at it. It's got
Speaker 1: the fork, the fork over the top so that it
Speaker 1: can cook up, the noodles can cook up, And said
Speaker 1: to her, it's the longest three minutes, just waiting for
Speaker 1: a cup of noodles to get nice and tender. And
Speaker 1: the problem is is, sometimes, especially with the new cup
Speaker 1: of noodles, it takes longer than three minutes. Sometimes I
Speaker 1: find the noodles are still too hard, and I've got
Speaker 1: to nuke them for another minute or so.
Speaker 3: Sometimes I have to forget about the noodles. Yeah, and
Speaker 3: then remember that who.
Speaker 1: Is that person who forgets about the noodles. You have
Speaker 1: to leave them in another room. They're like a phone.
Speaker 1: You can't have it in the same room with you.
Speaker 1: Otherwise it's a distraction.
Speaker 3: But if I left them in the break room, they'd
Speaker 3: be gone.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 1: You have to put them in a locked office. Somebody
Speaker 1: would touch them or do something. I understand your chain
Speaker 1: of custody needs for the cup of noodles, but it
Speaker 1: is the hardest thing to look at. One of the
Speaker 1: hardest things to look at is the fork over the
Speaker 1: cup of noodles while the noodles get ready.
Speaker 2: By the end of this segment, they should be ready.
Speaker 2: I'm hoping they're around. It's a long segment. That's gonna
Speaker 2: be a long time, all right. I feel your pain
Speaker 2: coming up.
Speaker 1: We will be going to the East coast to find
Speaker 1: out all that we want to know about Trump's addressed
Speaker 1: to Congress. As I mentioned, he is talking about it
Speaker 1: on truth Social saying that it's going to be musty
Speaker 1: TV and that he's going to tell it.
Speaker 2: Like it is.
Speaker 1: So I think you're going to see and embolden Trump,
Speaker 1: especially what happened with Zelensky today. You know, he got
Speaker 1: some heat after what went down in the Oval office.
Speaker 1: About the argument and the altercation in front of all
Speaker 1: those cameras and how they both behaved. And Zelensky came
Speaker 1: out this morning and said that he regrets the way
Speaker 1: that meeting went and that he is ready to fall
Speaker 1: in step essentially with Trump. He's definitely playing the game
Speaker 1: that Trump wants him to play, and I think that's
Speaker 1: going to embolden Trump as he goes before Congress, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, he hasn't needed. He has signed this
Speaker 1: flurry of executive orders and he's only needed a number one,
Speaker 1: the guy that he looks at in the mirror so far,
Speaker 1: and who does that embolden that same guy? So we
Speaker 1: will go to the East coast get an update on
Speaker 1: the reaction around Capitol Hill as we get ready, as
Speaker 1: we get ready for that address. Also with the tariffs
Speaker 1: mean as well. Gene Hackman and his death his wife's
Speaker 1: death remain a mystery. As we talked about yesterday, it's
Speaker 1: going to be several weeks before we find out what
Speaker 1: exactly happened. Whether we ever know what exactly happened, I
Speaker 1: don't know. But the tests will come back, we'll find
Speaker 1: out if they had anything in their system. Christiane Hackman
Speaker 1: ninety five, his wife sixty five. One of the comments
Speaker 1: or the concerns has been, well, if they were left there,
Speaker 1: if they were dead for nine or ten days, like
Speaker 1: some of the medical experts are opining, where was everybody?
Speaker 1: Did they have help at home? Where were the kids?
Speaker 1: What's going on? Well, it turns out they were kind
Speaker 1: of indicative of what happened to many of us after COVID,
Speaker 1: kind of keeping to ourselves, not interacting with the neighbors
Speaker 1: as much, maybe not having people over, maybe not having
Speaker 1: as many interactions with humans as we had pre pandemic.
Speaker 1: This is Santa Fe Summit where they live. It's a
Speaker 1: gated community just east of Santa Fe, New Mexico, and
Speaker 1: some of their nearest neighbors said they had seen no
Speaker 1: sign of the couple in recent years. The only way
Speaker 1: that they knew they were still there was the trash
Speaker 1: cans were put out waiting to be picked up on
Speaker 1: the days when that would happen. This is not a
Speaker 1: shocker that the couple did not attend homeowners' association meetings.
Speaker 2: Who does that?
Speaker 1: I mean, I know there are people who do that,
Speaker 1: and I support the people that do that, so that
Speaker 1: I don't have to do that, but Gene Hackman's not
Speaker 1: going to an HOA meeting the annual picnics they would have,
Speaker 1: they were not there, and they did have their share
Speaker 1: of friends around town. Gene Hackman had invested in a
Speaker 1: local restaurant where his paintings hung on the walls, so
Speaker 1: apparently he was a painter. She had the wife, Betsy,
Speaker 1: had co founded a store nearby that sells home goods.
Speaker 1: But they said that after COVID, the couple retreated further
Speaker 1: from public life, that they enjoyed the neighborhood's solitude. There
Speaker 1: were only about fifty five homes in the whole development there,
Speaker 1: and their privacy was respected. They've got neighbors that include
Speaker 1: other people that like their privacy, doctors, lawyers, executives that
Speaker 1: have been lured to the community for just that stunning
Speaker 1: views and privacy. But close enough to Santa Fe where
Speaker 1: if they want to go into town they can do that.
Speaker 1: They said that the only signs of life in the
Speaker 1: neighborhood when everyone descended upon said neighborhood following the discovery
Speaker 1: of the bodies, or just maintenance construction workers. It's not
Speaker 1: obviously a well trafficked place. Those who have bumped into
Speaker 1: Gene Hackman or Betsy over the year. Say they were friendly.
Speaker 1: They had an obvious love for their three dogs that
Speaker 1: they used to walk them in the neighborhood. One of
Speaker 1: those dogs, of course, they had three German shepherds, one
Speaker 1: of which was found dead in the house with them.
Speaker 1: I remember in that closet near where Betsy's body was
Speaker 1: discovered in the bathroom. There is a neighbor that says,
Speaker 1: you'll never forget the first time they met Gene Hackman
Speaker 1: more than a decade ago, that he pulled up alongside
Speaker 1: him in a truck, looked at their dogs and said,
Speaker 1: what cute puppies, Gene Hackman said, So apparently they were
Speaker 1: dog lovers. They loved it, and apparently one of the
Speaker 1: neighborhood dogs won some sort of dog prize. And Betsy
Speaker 1: had told the neighbor at the time, we noticed your
Speaker 1: dog in the paper. We recognized your dog in the paper.
Speaker 1: So it seems like nothing was afoot with this relationship,
Speaker 1: at least not with the neighbors. But how often do
Speaker 1: you see your neighbors? I mean, I've got a couple
Speaker 1: sets of neighbors that we see from time to time.
Speaker 1: One set is really good with having people over on
Speaker 1: occasions where we all see each other. But other than that,
Speaker 1: I would have no idea if I had dead neighbors
Speaker 1: next to me, Like if the neighbors two houses down
Speaker 1: were dead in there for ten days, I'd have no
Speaker 1: idea because I never see them. It's weird about neighborhoods,
Speaker 1: how infrequently you see your neighbors because you're going and
Speaker 1: leaving at different times, I guess, as opposed to like
Speaker 1: those old pictures of the fifties where all the dads
Speaker 1: would leave and they'd all back out of the tracked
Speaker 1: home neighborhoods at the same time and come home at
Speaker 1: the same time for dinner.
Speaker 2: It's very different now.
Speaker 1: I rarely see my neighbors out and about, so it's
Speaker 1: not odd for people to be I mean, how many
Speaker 1: dead people do you think you have in your neighborhood
Speaker 1: right now?
Speaker 2: It could be a bunch. You don't know. You don't know.
Speaker 2: It's a dark thought. How's the cup of noodles? How
Speaker 2: are we doing with that? They're almost almost after the break.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I was gonna say, I don't think they're done yet.
Speaker 1: I feel like because one of the things with cup
Speaker 1: of noodles is. Cup of noodles is like McDonald's. It's
Speaker 1: been the same taste your whole life. You know exactly
Speaker 1: what you're going to get, and if it's different, it's
Speaker 1: a disappointment.
Speaker 2: Yeah. And sometimes if you don't.
Speaker 1: Wait long enough and you get into those noodles and
Speaker 1: they're still a little hard, it's a disappointment.
Speaker 3: Either they're hard and cold or they're really really soft
Speaker 3: that they fall apart on your fork and burning hot.
Speaker 3: It's like no in between you. I almost have to
Speaker 3: catch it. There's like a small window. Yeah, hoping to
Speaker 3: catch that window.
Speaker 1: I'm one hundred years old and I still burn my
Speaker 1: tongue routinely on things that I know is going to burn,
Speaker 1: like pizza, Like just wait, just wait, do you really
Speaker 1: need to eat that right away?
Speaker 2: The cheese?
Speaker 1: It's the cheese, And then you've got this burning sensation
Speaker 1: of flesh on the roof of your mouth all day.
Speaker 1: That's awful. Back from dead neighbors to burning flesh. That's
Speaker 1: what we do here for you. On the Gary and
Speaker 1: Shannon Show, we will go live to DC to talk
Speaker 1: about the president's big address to him, calling it musty TV.
Speaker 2: Tonight at six. We'll take it live here on KFI.
Speaker 1: We'll find out what they're talking about on Capitol Hill
Speaker 1: when we come back to Gary and Shannon.
Speaker 2: You've been listening to The Gary and Shannon Show.
Speaker 1: You can always hear us live on FIAM six forty
Speaker 1: nine am to one pm every Monday through Friday, and
Speaker 1: any time on demand on the iheartradiol app