Speaker 1: What's going on? Thank you so much for listening to
this podcast. It is heard live every day from noon
to three on WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you
want exclusive content like invitations to events, the weekly live stream,
my daily show prep with all of the links, become
a patron, go to thepetecleanershow dot com. Make sure you
hit the subscribe button, get every episode for free, write
to your smartphone or tablet, and again, thank you so
much for your support. Did you know that the lie
of the year, according to one of those stupid fact checkers,
I think it's PolitiFact. They said the lie of the
year was Trump saying that the Haitians are eating the dogs,
they're eating the cats. That's the lie of the year. Really,
that was the lie of the year. How about Joe
Biden is fine? How about that one? I think that
one might be the lie of the year. I think
that might be the lie of the last four years. Actually,
or what about I won't pardon my son and then
he did lie of the year. I'd say that rises
to a level higher than the they're eating the dogs
and cats. Oh, by the way, do you remember when
they fact checked jd Vance during the interview when he
was talking about the apartment complex is getting taken over
in Colorado and oh, that's just it's only a couple
of them, right, And now the Colorado Aurora police went
in there and cleared out Trenda Agua made like a
I don't know, two dozen arrests for kidnapping, armed assault
and robberies and home invasions and stuff for taking over
that apartment complex, the very thing that they were highlighting.
So lies of the year. Better late than never, maybe,
But the Wall Street Journal has now told the tale
that nobody wanted to tell before the election, which is
that we were right that we could see that Joe
Biden was in cognitive decline and had been for several years,
and surely everybody around him must know this spoiler alert.
They did. They did, except apparently for Kamala Harris. This
is real. This is Eric Ericksson, I'll quote him, Eric Erickson,
talk show host down in Georgia. It is a damning
indictment on Harris that the Biden White House team kept
her out of the way. She is mentioned exactly once
in this Wall Street Journal amazing piece. She played no
real role, no role in the White House so all
the things that they were crediting her for she had
nothing to do with. She met with him every day
or every week, and she talked to him all the
time and had no idea that he was a mental decline.
So here, I do not have a subscription to The
Wall Street Journal, but I am open to receiving a
gift of one if anybody wants. But the Wall Street
Journal did a lengthy story by Annie Lynsky, Rebecca Bauhaus,
Emily Glazer, and Shavn Hughes documenting the lengths that Joe
Biden's staff at the White House went to in order
to cover up the president's rapid mental and physical decline,
not just from the public, but from his own cabinet
and advisors. In a normal world, says Dwayne Patterson at
hot air dot com. In a normal world, it's easily
the biggest scandal of the century thus far. Sadly, we're
not living in normalcy, and we have not been since
COVID when I wrote my op ed for The Blaze,
and I talked about how when I went to journalism school,
we heard how FDR was in a wheelchair, and the
media never reported on it. They never covered it. They
never told the public. JFK known Womanizer had lots of affairs.
Media knew never reported on it, and at the time,
as a young cub reporter to be, I was thinking,
surely like that would never happen again. I mean, that's
just crazy. And all that changed after Watergate. So goes
the lie that the j school teaches its students that
ever since Watergate stuff doesn't get covered covered up. I
should say, ever since then, you know, we could take
down presidents. Right. And then came Gary Hart on the
boat called monkey Business, where he challenged reporters, you find
me the scandal and then they just like pointed a
camera at this boat where he was, you know, getting
all canootily with what was her face? I was good?
Was it was that Han? Was that Jessica Han? Or
was that was that Jimmy Baker's I forget I may
I mixed the I mixed the mistresses up last time
I mentioned this, But the Gary Hart case was proof
that the media would no longer cover up for these
powerful men, right. And then watching the media cover up
for Joe Biden that prompted me to say, I don't
know any other way to punish the profess that I
used to have. I am no longer a reporter, not
a journalist. I don't know any other way to punish
these people in this industry except for my loan protest
vote that I had always used in the presidential elections
to protest the two parties and the candidates that they
were giving me. As long as I was quote throwing
my vote away, I might as well use it as
a protest against the media, because I know that they're
going to give Trump a hard time. But if that's
the way they're going to treat Joe Biden, I suspect
they'll treat Kamala Harris the exact same way. And so
I'm voting against that. And so I voted for Trump,
and I wrote it not bad about it. We all
could tell. We all saw it, and they gaslit us,
the media and Democrats. But I repeat myself, they gaslit
us for four years. As recently as June, there was
only one narrative coming out of the Democrat a betting
Manhattan Built Way media complex, and it was that Joe
Biden is fine. He's better than fine. He's never been better.
He's now taken to doing jumping jacks in the Oval Office.
He's juggling, flaming, bowling pins and such. All this nonsense
being pedled on right wing sites and talk radio. It's disinformation.
The videos that we were seeing, they weren't real. They
were cheap fakes. Remember that term, cheap fakes. They literally
called them fakes. The video of Joe Biden wandering around
aimlessly looking for some familiar face to guide him off
a stage, that's a cheap fake. That's not true. That
didn't happen. The Washington Post. He gives several examples, by
the way, in this piece at hodair dot com The
Washington Post, I'll just give you this one selected clips
they said had been edited to present a particularly damaging
and often misleading picture. Such dis perceptively edited videos, known
as cheap fakes because they misrepresent events simply by manipulating
video or audio or by leaving out context, have become
staples of Republican attacks against Biden. So what would be
the context? M What would be the context when he
goes over and starts nibbling on a baby's leg? Like?
What am I missing there? You know? Is it baby nibbling?
National Appreciation Day or something? What is there? Some sort
of a grand theme that I just can't see. Glenn Kessler,
the Washington Post so called fact checker, Yeah, I know,
it's is it self ironic. In this piece covering disinformation,
gives four pinocchios two right wing media for misleading videos
and cheap fakes. They gave it four pinocchios. Quote. This
is Kesler at the WAPO. Unfortunately, some of President Biden's
right wing critics don't respect their readers or themselves and
resort to misinformation and cheap fakes because his performance in
office is so threatening to them that they feel a
need to make things up. Oh, I'm sorry. That was
Kessler quoting Andrew Bates, the White House Press secretary. But
the fact that Bates said it, not Kessler. You couldn't
even tell the difference, right, Hence my point. They were
literally saying that Republicans and right wingers are making up
these videos right, depriving you of the full context of
Biden's increasing dementia, where you're just not seeing it all.
And the reason why they're resorting to it is because,
you know, they don't respect themselves or their readers, and
they're just really mad that we are doing so great
and it was all a lie, and not just this year,
but all four years of Biden's presidency. For over a
month now, I have been reminding you to preserve your
precious photos and slides, films, and tapes with Creative Video
based in mint Hill. These family heirlooms hold priceless stories,
moments from years past that are irreplaceable. If you've thought
about saving these memories before they fade away, you are
not alone. This is Creative Video's busiest season, and with
the holidays fast approaching, there is no better time than
right now, so you need to hurry imagine the perfect
holiday gift. Memories from past family events captured forever. Creative
Video skilled team will professionally transfer your family stories onto
easy to use USB drives or DVDs that won't deteriorate
over time, like the old photos and tapes are doing
right now. Picture it sitting together after a holiday meal,
watching these family favorites, sharing laughs, shedding a few tears,
and telling the stories that make your family uniquely yours.
Get your memories in now and beat the holiday rush.
Visit create event video dot com to learn more. That's
create a video dot Com. Wall Street Journal Bombshell that
everybody kind of knew already if you were, like not
just getting your news from the Washington Post, Wall Street
Journal reports. To adapt to Joe Biden's mental decline, that's
what they're talking about the White House. To adapt the
White House around the needs of a diminished leader. They
told visitors to keep meetings focused interactions with senior Democrat
lawmakers and some cabinet cabinet members, including powerful secretaries such
as Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin Treasury's Janet Yellen. Right these
meetings were infrequent or grew less frequent. Some legislative leaders
had a hard time getting the president's ear at key moments,
including a head of the US's disastrous pullout from Afghanistan. Well,
now that would explain something, wouldn't it. Although they claimed
they did it just fine and never mentioned it again after.
You know, he looked at his watch on the tarmac
that day, But that would explain it. Maybe the President
wasn't actually involved in any of those decisions. Senior advisors
were often put into roles that some administration officials and
lawmakers thought Biden should occupy. In other words, other people
were making the calls, other people were doing his job
with people such as National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan no really,
Senior counselor Steve Richetti, and National Economic Council had Lale braindead,
sorry Brainerd and her predecessor frequently in the position of
being go betweens for the president. Go betweens, but maybe
just not even talking to the president, because why bother.
Let me think about it, if you're the go between
and you're relaying what the president supposedly told you, so
you're now acting as the middleman or woman. I'm not
trying to be gender specific. You're the middle person and
the President is not even aware of whatever this issue is.
Even if you told him, he would forget it, So
why even bother including him in the decision making process.
I'll just do it myself. You're going to tell me
that never happened. Wall Street Journal says press aids who
compiled packages of news clips for Biden were told by
senior staff, get this to exclude negative stories about the president.
Don't put anything negative about Joe into the news. The
President wasn't talking to his own pollsters, as the surveys
that were coming back showed him trailing in the twenty
twenty four race. Well, that explains it. Now, that explains
why he's up there saying things like about it. Right now,
it all makes sense. He really did think that he
was leading in the polls. Remember when he said I
think it was was it in the debate or is
it an interview after the terrible debate performance, and he
said something like, my polls. You know, we've got polls
showing me ahead. They literally were not showing him any polls.
He was not talking to his own polsters, and they
weren't showing him any video clips, any news clippings of
negative stories about him. So he must have thought, I
am the man like this is the best presidency ever.
So why would you do that? Think about it now.
I don't know if this is addressed in the story,
but why would you withhold this information from president's sundowner?
Why would you do that? You don't want to agitate him.
That's what happens. As people suffer cognitive decline, they get agitated.
That's why you use the word sundowner. Just as the
day goes on, their state deteriorates. When the sun goes down,
they get worse. And if you stir them up and
get them all angry and agitated, and that explains the
flashes of anger that he would display. Right if the
president was having an off day. Get this, meetings could
be scrapped altogether. They just cancel them. On one occasion,
in the spring of twenty twenty one, a national security
so this is right after he got into office, a
national security official explained to another aid why a meeting
needed to be rescheduled. Here's the quote. He has good
days and bad days, and today was a bad day.
So we're going to address this tomorrow. That is what
you say. Look, I do a lot of work with
the Alzheimer's Association. I'm not mocking people who are afflicted
with this awful condition. It is terrible. I know that firsthand.
That being said, this is what people say when they
are caregivers for people with dementia. Good days and bad days,
and eventually the bad days outnumber the good days, and
eventually there aren't any good days. I said this a
year ago. It doesn't get any better. Some one is
today is the best that they will be in regards
to the cognitive function. They don't rebound, it's just a decline.
While it isn't uncommon for politicians to want more time
with the President than they can get. Some Democrats felt
Biden was unusually hard to reach. That was by design.
All right, hey, real quick, if you would like to
get your product or service in front of about ten
thousand people multiple times a day, send me an email
at Pete at Thepetecalnarshow dot com and ask me about advertising.
It's super affordable, it's baked into this podcast forever, and
podcasts have a higher conversion rate than other social media platforms,
making it the best bang for your buck. Send me
a message Pete at Thepetecalnarshow dot com and I can
show you how it works. Run the numbers with you again.
That's Pete at the Petecalndarshow dot com. Media people are
just perplexed as to how they could have been deceived
for so long by Joe Biden and his tiny, tiny,
an inner circle of people who I haven't even seen named.
How they could have been deceived that he was in
cognitive decline for so long. Oh my gosh, All the
lengths that the tiny, tiny, little circle of people around
him went to obscure the fact of his cognitive decline
that was never on display at any event ever publicly,
I justugh, how did they trick us? James Homan, he's
an editorial writer and columnist at the Washington Post, and
he does a series of tweets just shocked. The White
House went to great lengths to conceal Biden's decline, not
just from the American people, but from members of his
own cabinet and key Democrats on the Hill. They limited
interactions and used go betweens to reduce visibility into how
frail he had become. Man, I tell you, if only
there was some clue along the way that we could
have looked at and seen like, Wow, this guy is
incognitive declient, It really is amazing, is it not? So?
Why now? This is the next question. Dwayne Patterson. Yeah.
Dwayne Patterson at hot air dot com asks the question
why now? Why? Why is this tale being told now?
Is this some last ditch effort to get Joe to
step beside and put Kamala in charge for a week
or two so she could be the first woman president? Like, yay,
here's your participation trophy. That's the equivalent here that we're
talking about, right, So why why now? So? Dwayne Patterson says,
Biden's debate performance against Trump peeled the veneer off the
facade that Biden was competent to be president now or
in the future. It was Joe Biden himself that forced
the Democrat elite to kick him to the curb. It
was the naked display of Biden's slippage that caused regime
media to briefly do stories like the one the Wall
Street Journal did today, but the mainstream media, democrat controlled media,
democrat media did in July, right right after that debate performance.
Then all of a sudden, you saw these stories about,
oh my gosh, like he's not on his game, and
they were like, it's just one bad performance. Remember that
line that they were trotting out there and making Joe
available for sixteen second interviews and stuff, And that was
the cover story. It was just one bad debate performance.
We all have bad debate performance and all that. But
then there were some Democrats that were like, whoa, whoa, whoa,
I han't seen the guy in like three years, that's
not that Joe Biden and I knew and all this.
And then you started seeing and clooney he put out
the op ed and all that. But then what happened
right that angle disappeared as soon as they subbed in
Kamala Harris right as soon as as soon as Joe
was like, ah, gonna run again, and then Harris is like,
I got all the support and then act blue with
all of its fake, you know, straw donations, like look
at the ground, swallow of support, She's so popular, and
then all of a sudden, it was like Joe's got
a great job, and they just flipped again. So why
now they could have been doing these stories? The Wall
Street Journal talked to apparently like fifty people for this story.
This was a massive story. It is the biggest scandal
I would submit in my lifetime, the biggest presidential scandal
in my lifetime. This is it. I've been saying this,
gosh for two years, and if I could see it,
every journalist working anywhere next to, adjacent to, or on
a national beat had seen it too. Does media harbor
the fantasy that their past sins of commission and omission
are going to be forgiven and forgotten, their credibility will
somehow be restored in the new year, now that the
election is lost. Do they think that? Patterson says, I
don't think so. So why now and he says it's
because they are angry. They are bitter, and they feel used. Regime.
Media is ticked off that Joe and Jill put them
in this nightmare. They're mad because the Bidens immediately backed
Harris and they were forced to make a souflay out
of an excrement sandwich. And not to be overlooked as
the relationship that Joe Biden and the White House has
had with their purported ally in the media. We've talked
about this too, that the Biden White House the administration
has treated media terribly. Right, these reporters that go there
and grovel in front of him and lobb in the
softball questions and stuff, all to try to get a
longer interview with them and ingratiate themselves and sniff the throne,
and Biden just laughs at them, right, But they're all
shouting questions at him like the he holds them in contempt.
Up to this point, Patterson writes, all Democrats, media and
elected politicians, including their staffs, we're basically all in the
same boat, rowing oars in the same direction because they're
all left wing and they had a common enemy, the
Orange Man. Now they lost. Now they're not at all
happy to have been treated like dirt. For the last
four years. Biden rarely, if ever, granted interviews. When they
were given, the questions were scripted out, and if reporters deviated,
staff would end the interview early. The White House press
corps were herded in for photo ops and promptly heard
it out before being able to ask questions. Press conferences
were ridiculously stagecraft and managed, if they were even held
at all. The Bidens hold on regime media. I'm sorry,
the Bidens hold regime media in the same regard conservatives do.
When push comes to shove, and as long as a
longtime Gop hand tells me, it's like a master beating
his dog one too many times. The dog will take
those beatings for only so long, and then eventually that
dog will turn on the master and fight back, and
it gets ugly. I think that's what we're beginning to
see largely, and we'll continue throughout the remainder of Biden's term, right,
because there's nothing else to be gained in the relationship
from these reporters or by their reporters, right, there's nothing else.
I said this at the time when Trump won, I
said maybe now we will see an accounting of what
really happened. Maybe now this is going to free up
reporters to tell that story and to lay bare the
lie that we could all see. The problem is so
many of the reporters helped to spread that lie and
to cover it up. So I think the only thing
they can say now is that they were kept at
arm's length. They didn't know, they couldn't tell. But that's
not believable, because we could tell. And if we could tell,
that means we know they could too. All right, So
this just in, and I say just in, but it
actually occurred a couple hours ago, but for our purposes
it is breaking. The Georgia Court of Appeals just ruled
that Fanny Willis will be disqualified from the twenty twenty
election case along with her entire office. Oh the dahn.
Doesn't that just feel good? You know? I just but
just for the record, still not tired of winning? Still
not tired of all of the winning? Okay, very likely
The death knell of the entire case says Will Chamberlain,
not the basketball player, This is Will Chamberlain. They would
need to find another county willing to take it on.
So here's an excerpt from the order from the court.
After carefully considering the trial Court's findings in its order,
we canclude that it aired by failing to disqualify DA
Willis and her office. The remedy crafted by the trial
court to prevent an ongoing appearance of impropriety did nothing
to address the appearance of impropriety that existed at times
when DA Willis was exercising her broad pre trial discretion
about who to prosecute and what charges to bring. While
we recognize that an appearance of impropriety generally is not
enough to support disqualification, this is the rare case in
which disqualification is mandated, and no other remedy will suffice
to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings. Accordingly,
we reverse the trial Court's denial of the appellant's motion
to disqualify d A. Willis in her office, as we
conclu that the elected DA is wholly disqualified from this case.
The assistant district attorneys, whose only power to prosecute a
case is derived from the constitutional authority of the DA
who appointed them, have no authority to proceed, so they're
all out. Eric Schmidt he is United States Senator from Missouri,
and he says Fanny Willis and Nathan Wade colluded with
Biden's White House Council office to bring this law fair
case in Fulton County. Like the other lawfair cases, this
one is now crumbling in the Senate. We will get
answers and be transparent with the people. A reckoning is
coming in two weeks. So this goes to his comment
there goes to the story. I think it was the
New York Post that had it. I saw like a
day or two ago that Nathan Wade had made several
visits to the White House. Now I know how it looks,
and there's a reason why it looks so bad. It's
because it's bad. He went to the White House obviously
to talk with the administration about prosecuting Donald Trump doing
it down in Fulton County. Right, And now I have
to wonder based on the Wall Street Journal reports the
quote plausible deniability, right that I think we saw referenced
in the documentary Independence Day, right with the Jeff Goldbloom
in there and about Area fifty one and the aliens
that we caught and all of that stuff. And no,
they never tell the President that we have all of
the alien spaceships and dead bodies and stuff. Why so
this way, when the President gets up there and says
this is all a lie, that's just conspiracy theories, they
have plausible deniability, which means what that they can deny
that they know anything, and they really don't know anything,
and so they come across as being truthful. So if
Joe Biden is mentally incapacitated, he's, you know, sitting there
watching Judge Judy eating his tapioca, then they don't ever
meet with him. Nathan Wade never meets with Joe. Maybe
he does a handshake, grip and grin and then he's gone.
But whoever was around Joe Biden and was orchestrating these
types of operations? Right, these are the people that need
to be identified. These are the ones that need to
be hauled in front of Congress, put under oath, forced
to testify. And if they don't prosecute them for what,
I'm not sure yet. But find me the man, I'll
find you the crime. I'm just kidding. It's just as
an old Dustoyevski joke. Okay, all right, that'll do it
for this episode. Thank you so much, for listening. I
could not do the show without your support and the
support of the businesses that advertise on the podcast, so
if you'd like, please support them too and tell them
you heard it here. You can also become a patron
at my Patreon page or go to thepetecalanarshow dot com. Again,
thank you so much for listening, and don't break anything
while I'm gone.