Speaker 1: The the the.
Speaker 2: The the.
Speaker 1: The the the the the the the the.
Speaker 2: The the.
Speaker 1: The the the the the.
Speaker 2: The the.
Speaker 1: Bul Bul bul the the the the the the the.
Speaker 2: The the the the the the the the the.
Speaker 1: The build the bud They do.
Speaker 3: All right? What's up? Welcome everybody. It's another amazing live
stream back with my good buddy Kai of Orthodox Shota
and Kai had a great idea a while to do
a series on Islamic geopolitics. Of course, Orthodox Shahada has
done a tremendous amount of work in the last few
years focusing on refuting Muhammedidism Islam Islamism from both the
internal critiques and the internal textual critiques of the Qur'an,
the philosophical critiques, biblical critiques, et cetera, as well as
our ongoing series against the Monophysites. So we're going to
start another series as well, dealing with a set of
geopolitical texts. So we won't be getting into all of
those books today, but we be kind of giving an
introduction an overview. Kai and I have both read several
of the same texts, as you guys know, we have
put a good bit of time and effort into this topic.
In the last several years. Of course, I was reading
some of the Islamic geopolitical stuff before I knew anything
really about the religion. So it's nice to be in
this position where both Kai and I can kind of
overlap and kind of read some of the same texts
and get into some of the same information. So we're
going to kick it off today. Of course, Kai has
a great series of slides and whatnot that we're going
to go to. But Kai, what made you think that
this would be a good idea to do? I think
it is what keyed you into this, and what are
some of the texts that you chose that we're going
to be talking about, and what made you select those
for today's lecture?
Speaker 2: Right, So thanks for having me Jay, I'm really excited
to do the series. So one of the things that
I think is very relevant to look at this topic
in particular is up until now, we've really been covering
Islam in a more kind of theoretical level, trying to
understand it through the lens of Christianity, specifically Orthodoxy, trying
to understand it from within the Islamic lens itself with
its own paradigms, And it was really kind of like
just a theoretical exercise just looking at things intellectually, But
now things are getting very serious with regards to the
geopolitics on the world stage. A lot of things changing
in Europe, in North America, the influence that Islam is
having societally, the influence that Islam is having politically in
all of these countries that are traditionally not Islamic, and
the ghettoizations that you're seeing popping up in basically wherever
Muslims are migrating to, and then the trend to want
to start basically islamicizing much of the rest of the world.
And now it's the point where it's like, okay, we
need to start putting aside the theoretical understandings of what
Islam teaches with regards to monotheism or whatever it may be,
and actually look at what Muslims are doing, what is
Islamic law, How are Muslim societies functioning, What are they
doing in the West, how are they basically altering the
landscape within the West and other non traditionally non Islamic countries,
Seeing how the powers to be are manipulating Muslims for
their nefarious purposes for global dominance, global control, the whole
geopolitical landscape in this and I think it's now about
really informing people before it's too late. So one of
the things that I want to aim with these with
the series is to really inform people to know how
their countries are undergoing drastic changes and what the prospect
looks like once Islam becomes dominant in these in these countries.
To answer your other thing with regards to the types
of books, really, I'm kind of just doing a big
net to just catch whatever is written on the subject.
In the presentation there you just saw a sampling of books.
Those are great books for people just getting into the
topic to wet their feet in. It's kind of though.
They're really good at opening your eyes to see how
non Muslim governments and agencies utilize Islam and utilize Muslims
for their own purposes, whether it's like the CIA or
whatever it may be, and why they would support Muslims,
why they would support a seemingly Islamic cause and it couldn't.
Books can be on like the Muslim Brotherhood for example.
I haven't really put those up on the screen, but
those are very relevant. So really I'm just trying to
read everything that is within reasonable accessibility on the topic,
but I'm also supplementing it with a lot of Islamic
sources directly from within Islam itself, to justify my analysis,
to justify why I think the geopolitic geopolitics is unfolding
the way that it is. And I'll talk about that
as we progress through through the presentation and through the series.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and a lot of this is partly, you know,
books that, as we said, I mentioned and have covered
over the years. Guys recall we did some talks about
ten years ago on the Channel on Dreyfus's book Devil's
Game and Mark Curtis's book Secret Affairs. In the case
of Mark Curtis's book, it's important to remember that it's
a Royal Institute for National Affairs supported text, where as
Mark Curtis was a Royal Society researcher, so it's not
a conspiracy text. Dreyfus was a Rolling Stones reporter and
more of a mainline left minded journalist, but that is
also not a conspiracy text. So we're going to be
focusing on more of the historical and academic and geopolitical sphere.
We're not going to be looking at primarily any theoretical texts,
but as Kai said, when we get into the geopolitical
and historical, we're also going to be using Kai's analysis
and insights to bounce it off of Islamic law, thick
tradition in the Koran. And if you guys didn't know,
on my channel, we did recently do a members talk
on Paul Williams as an FBI consultant, his book on
the Brotherhood of Al Qaeda, and we also did some
years back another talk on a book that is relevant
to this topic, which is Gould and Fitzgerald's book Afghanistan's
Untold Story Invisible History, The History of Afghanistan. And I
also have talks on the Curtis book and the Dreyfus
book in the Archives and the other texts that are
also very relevant to our discussion which I don't have
at this domicile, So that would be things like Blumenthal's
Management of Savagery book which we covered also a few
weeks ago, and even some of the history of the
Massad texts would also be relevant for this, although we
are focusing on Islam here. So we're going to let
Kai begin the talk and I will be chiming in
with my thoughts and insights, and of course, as you
guys know from modern Islamic setting, I guess you could say,
in the modern world, you have to also know about
the history of the British Empire, because that's a huge
piece of the puzzle, particularly with the collapse of the Ottomans,
the British alliance with various factions of Sunni Islam as
a buttress against the Ottomans as they fell, the support
for the Muslim brotherhood, Wahabism, so Laphism, all of those
things are going to come into place. Okai, where do
you want to kick off this conversation right now?
Speaker 2: Okay? So I can just kind of go right into
my slides, and basically this first part will be a
little dry, but it is relevant because it's going to
talk about Islamic law specifically. So before we get into
the government agencies and whatnot, we're going to look at
what Islam itself teaches about jihad. We're going to look
at what is within the Muslim mindset. So even though
the non Muslim agencies will utilize Muslims for their purposes,
the Muslims themselves a lot of the Times actually believe
in the teachings of Islam and they are genuinely wanting
to further the advance of Islam. And so it's very
important to understand the mind set of Muslims in general,
and so I want to focus heavily on the topic
of jihad. And this is very important in my opinion,
because there is that oft repeated mantra that Islam is
a quote unquote peaceful religion. Muslims will say that non
Muslim politicians will say that everyone wants to convince you
that Islam is a peaceful religion, that jihad is just
something that is defensive or whatever it may be, but
basically to minimize the threat that Islam itself poses at
its very core, like what inherently Islam is meant to
do in terms of global domination. So on this slide,
you see here I have a picture of a series
of books, and that is a twenty twenty four twenty
five I think it's twenty four volume work. It's a
recent publication. It is completely available for free online for
those who can't read Arabic. Unfortunately, it is only in Arabic,
but the author has made it available online for the
benefit of those who cannot afford to buy it. Those
are the two links where you can see this Iban
Najar Oldmyati. That's the author and what that compilation is.
It's the entirety of Islamic law of all of the
four main Sydney schools, the Hanafi, Maliki, Chafi and Hanbili schools,
and it's detailing in great precision the Islamic law on
all topics, whether it's praying, fasting, marriage, divorce, jihad, it's
all there, and not just that it's presenting the information,
but it's presenting what is known as the matamad, the
relied upon positions of each of these schools. So these
are the authoritative stances if you belong to that particular school.
This is what that school teaches. It's not just the
opinion of one scholar here or there. It is what
the school teaches, and it is what represents authentic Islam.
Another set that I'm going to be relying on is
it's like two volume works. This is for the Shaffii
school for example. It's basically the Colossa. It's a summarized
form of what we find in that set, just basically
kind of not giving as much of the evidences, but
more just stating what the laws are. And then also
I'm going to be relying on this five volume work here.
This is the more Talmad position of the Shafi moth Hub,
the Shafi school. And this for anybody who is going
to tell me that what I'm presenting.
Speaker 3: Which one has to do with the Wadieb and the
queisas hotter Rock, I'm just I'm just joking. I hear
these these Arabic terms.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's go ahead, the Dune moth Hub. But there's
gonna be a lot of people that are going to
tell us that are going to probably say, oh, that
is not Islam, or that is not you see this,
You see that word right there, more Talmad. That is
the authentic representation of Islamic law. There is no doubt
whatsoever that what I'm going to be presenting from these
sources is what Islamic scholars have said is the official
position of Islam. And this is the four Sunni schools,
and this is basically what is entailed by Islam. When
you talk about Islam, it's not just the opinion of
some random person. Jihad means to fight the non Muslims,
in order for Islam to become dominant. Islamic legal jurisprudence
or states that jihad in the context specifically with regards
to Islam means fighting pitalu the non Muslims al Kufar
in order to support the spread of Islam the nusratil Islam. Now,
the phraseology here is quite revealing. The concept of nasar
is taken directly from the Quran and refers to the
supposed eventual and inevitable dominance of Islam. So, for example,
in chapter one ten, verses one through two of the Quran,
when Allah secure nasru Lahi and the triumph cometh and
now seest mankind entering the religion of a law in troops. So,
in other words, Allah will always support the Muslim community
or umah to wage jihad in order to spread Islam,
just as how Muhammad was supported fourteen centuries ago. The
imagery and connection of nasar brings comfort to Muslims because
in waging jihad, they emulate Muhammad, as the Quran indicates
they should do, namely in chapter thirty three, verse twenty one. Verily,
in the messenger of a law, you have a good
example for him who look at it onto a law
in the last day and remember it a lah much.
Speaker 3: Quick question, Kyle. I know it's a this is kind
of a basic level question, but we do have a
lot of people that may not be familiar with all
the ins and outs of Islam. So what is the
source in your mind of this idea that Islam does
not wasige Jahad like this anymore, it is only religion
of peace. Where do you think that comes from?
Speaker 2: So I will talk about that that is in the presentation,
that actually comes from Muhammad's own lifetime. I will talk
about it in more detail. But basically, when Muhammad started
his ministry, he was in Mecca, he was in the minority,
and at that time, fearing any kind of reprisal, he
could not engage in any kind of violent behavior or
any kind of violent rhetoric. And so that is what's
known as the Meccan phase. And I'll talk about it
again in the presentation, But that mechan phase is where
Islam is literally reduced to just peaceful coexistence with your
non Muslim neighbors. You preach to them, but you don't
do anything forcible against them. You don't impose yourself on them.
You teach them that religion, that Islam is peaceful, and
that's where you get statements in the Koran like to
you is your religion and to me is my religion.
And if if you're a Jew or Christian, you will
still be saved and you don't have to become a
Muslim right now. So it's all of these peaceful like
verses in the Quran, but those are within the context
when Muslims are in the minority and to avoid getting
any kind of reprisal. And so this is the message
that Muslims will put forward that Islam is a peaceful,
peaceful religion. It comes from from that from historically, from
Muhammed's own lifetime. So continuing on, so this next part,
this is literally taken right from this book here in
the more Tamma of the Shaffi Efek, and it's a
statement here that is very telling and it says that
jihad is the pinnacle of Islam. Now this part here
I translated it myself directly. This set, these series, these
books that I'm relying on for Islamic law, they are
not available in English, so the stuff I have to
translate it myself. But the thrust here is that Islam
is inherently violent and oppressive, with its primary purpose being
to conquer the world and subjugate everyone under it. So
forcible global islamization is imperative to Islam. And this is
what Islamic law is basically saying. It says jihad is
the pinnacle of Islam. And those of you who know
can read Arabic, you will read the Arabic terms and
the way that pinnacle I chose to translate it in
that word, but what it literally means, it's like the
top most part of the camel's hump, and that's the
most important, most important part. So that's the imagery that
you're seeing as an Arab speaker when you're reading it.
Speaker 3: By the way, Kai, we have some people asking you
do have a discord server, correct?
Speaker 4: I do have discord server, yes, and it's.
Speaker 3: Active, and you focus a lot on these same topics, right.
Speaker 2: Yes, we focus on the same topics. It hasn't been
active for the last little while because I've just been
busy with my own personal life things, but it is
still there. People will be active in to whatever degree
they are.
Speaker 3: And is that link on your channel? Can they get
to that from your channel?
Speaker 2: Yes? Yeah, yeah. If they go to the YouTube channel,
they will see the link to the Discord.
Speaker 3: People are asking, so I wanted to get that out there,
but go ahead.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, no, for sure, sure, for sure. And if
you guys want to come to the Discord channel and
Discord server and talk about these topics, I'm more than
happy to when when time permits. So yeah, So when
you're reading it, this is the context, the way jihad
is expressed, the pinnacle of Islam. It is among the
most important characteristics of the religion, so much so that
some scholars call it the sixth foundational constituent of Islam.
So when you're studying Islam, you're taught that you have
the testification of faith, the Shahada, that you have prayer
or Salat, that you have charities, the cut, that you
have some more fasting, and you have Hodje, the pilgrimage
to Mecca, and so those are the kind of like
the five pillars of Islam. And what this is saying
is is that jihad, by a lot of scholars is
kind of considered the sixth foundational constituent of Islam, and
its purpose is to be the means by which the
spread of Islam is achieved, namely the deliverance of the
message of Islam to all mankind, thereby fulfilling what the
Most High I e Allah said in addressing the messenger
of a law, I em Mohammad, by tasking him and
his nation. I am Muslims after him, and we have
not sent you, O Mohammad, except as a mercy to
the world's and the Most High said say O Mohammed,
O mankind. Indeed, I am the messenger of a law
to you all. So this is basically Islamic scholars recognizing
that you've got chronic verses that establishes Mohammad's message as
for all of mankind. And so since Muhammad himself was
personally not able to spread that message worldwide or globally,
that task now falls on to the Muslims who follow
after him generation after generation. That obligation to preach Islam
to the entire world is extended to them. They have
that obligation. Now. Jihad is legislated by the Quran, according
to Muslim scholars. An example, you have Qur'an twenty two
thirty nine that legislates defensive jihad or jihad dafay, and
you also have offensive jihad or jihad a tullab legislated
in the Qur'an nine seventy three, for example, But there
are many, many, many verses that legislate jihad. This is
just an example. Jihad is also legislated by the Sunna,
according to Muslim scholars. And now the following is a
hadith found in both Sahik Puhari and Sahik Muslim, But
there are many such hadiths. This is only just one
example that I'm citing, and I'm citing it because it's
popular for Muslim scholars to cite it themselves, and that's
you'll see it cited in these law books. And it says,
I have been commanded to fight the people until they
testify that there is no deity except a law and
that Muhammad is his messenger, and establish the prayer and
pay the charity. And if they do this, then their
blood and property are secured except by the rights of Islam,
and their accountability is left to a law. So this
is specifically with regards to offensive jihad. Now I want
to mention something highly important with regards to this particular hadith.
It is a very well known tactic by Muslim apologists
that whenever they are confronted with a damaging hadith that
contradicts their message, they attempt to dismiss it away, as
if to say it is dief or weak, as if
to doubt the contents or its binding nature. The above
hadith I just mentioned, and which Muslim scholars themselves mention
when discussing the topic of jihad, is found in both
Buchari and Muslim. This is very important. Highlighting this point
is something that the Muslim scholars themselves do because such
a hadith, a hadith that is in both Bukhari and Muslim,
is termed mutt alai or agreed upon in hadith methodology.
This is the highest level of correctness and authenticity that
hadith can have. Such a standard is so highly regarded
that stating that a hadith is is proof enough of
its authenticity. So Muslims have no way to explain a
way the sadith and others like it.
Speaker 3: By the way, this is this is kay, You're the
first to be on when I've got my new camera
angle here, So this is the diva angle. This is
the official diva cam nice nice anyway, So it's good
to break it up and not have the same uh,
you know image every single time, So go ahead, absolutely.
Speaker 2: So as for interpreting the various chronic versus calling for jihad,
because a lot of people who say that Islam is
a peaceful religion, they're going to tell you you're interpreting
these chronic verses incorrectly. They don't mean offensive jihad, they
mean just defensive. So like, if you get attacked, you
have the right to defend yourself. No you don't, you do,
but you have the obligation to wage jihad. So, for example,
the one priestly mentioned verse nine seventy three, Oh, prophet,
strive jahid against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, be harsh
with them, and in these books pick them up right.
There Islamic law explicitly comments on not just these types
of verses, but this verse specifically, and it clarifies how
it is to be understood. That is in meaning fight
the non Muslims by the sword the safe. So those
who can read Arabic, that's the Arabic that you will
find written in in those texts. So in other words,
this Quran verse and others like it are to be
understood to mean that jihad is to be waged using
the sword. Chapter nine of the Quran is filled with
many such verses. Another one is Chapter two, verse two sixteen.
All of these verses you're going to see these Islamic
law books. Quote. I'm just giving one example for the
sake of brevity on the stream, but numerous numerous verses
are given by the scholars to justify offensive jihad and
that you're understanding it by using the sword. Now, there
are liars and those uneducated who attempt to twist the
meaning of jihad and claim it is merely a private
spiritual struggle. They call this jihad of the nufs or soul,
and this understanding has absolutely nothing to do with Islamic
law or Shariah. And I'm putting this as for the
benefit of the people who encounter this type of argument
from Muslim apologists from a purely legalistic standpoint by which
the Islamic state functions. Remember Islamic law. For an Islamic
state nuts refers to the individual in the sense that
jihad is personal, as in it is something you personally do,
just as how you personally pray, personally fast, personally, give charity,
personally make the pilgrimage to Mecca and so on. Jihad
is to personally exert effort in helping spread Islam globally,
i e. What you personally do to bring about the
global dominance of Islam. Jihad is not some private spiritual
struggle that you do in the comfort of your own
home that is known as taskiata enofs Okay. There is
a completely separate doctrine for this spiritual struggle that you
do privately in your own home. It's not jihad. It's
something completely different tski at the enoughs. Jihad in the
context of Islamic law is about Muslims versus non Muslims.
Jihad is obligatory, and there are two terms used in
Arabic woudjub and fad. Now this is gonna be a
little bit technical, but I just want to mention it.
While the Hanafi school of jurisprudence distinguishes the two, the
other three schools basically treat Woodjubenfad as synonymous. But the
point here is that jihad is considered an obligation, and
Islamic law recognizes two types of obligation, the individual obligation
and the communal obligation. The individual obligation or fard ain
is to wage defensive jihad against non Muslim invaders, and
no one is included from this. Sorry, no one is
excluded from this obligation. All must participate, including women and children.
But with regards to communal obligation or fard kifaya, it
is to wage offensive jihad against non Muslims in their
own respective lands in order to spread Islam, and it
is to be conducted at least once a year with
the Amom or his representative. It's right in there, but
it is not incumbent upon every individual. Only how many
individuals as are necessary to have successful campaign need to participate.
Muslims may enter into peace treaties only when the Muslim
community is weak, but now here is the kicker. Should
Muslims have the upper hand, then Islamic law mandates that
they must break the peace treaties and conquer the land.
It's explicitly written in the text. If Muslims have the
upper hand, meaning that they can wage a successful campaign
to take over a land and establish Islamic law, they
are legally obligated under Islamic law to do so. They
cannot hide behind peace treaties. They must break the peace
treaties so peace treaties are basically used as a way
to for the Muslim community to maybe avert aggression by
the non Muslims against the Muslims, stall for time, whatever
it is, But there is no honesty at its core.
When Muslims engage in peace treaties. You need to know
that by Islamic law, the Muslim is not engaging in
a peace treaty in an honest way. He's only doing
it because he can't conquer you. The moment that he
can conquer you, then he has the obligation under Islamic
law to do so. Now this is where I'm going
to talk a little bit more about the historical example
of Muhammad's own lifetime with regards to the so called
peaceful understanding of Islam. So you find it written in
the Islamic law books the way that they describe jihad.
They do talk about it as evolving over multiple stages,
specifically four stages. During the Meccan phase, Muslims coexisted peacefully
alongside non Muslims. Islam was preached in a non hostile way,
and this is jihad of the tongue, meaning to spread
Islam through talking. While this manner of spreading Islam is
part of jihad, it is restricted to the Meccan phase.
Most importantly, however, is that the Meccan phase was when
the Muslim community was weak and unable to impose Islam
as the law of the land. This reflects Muhammad's initial
ministry while in Mecca, where he knew that any overt
offensive hostility would lead to severe backlash. Then came the
Medinan phase, which consists of three sub phases. The Medeinan
phase starts when Muhammad migrated to Medina to the north
of Mecca in order to flee persecution by the Meccans,
and this migration is known as the Hijra, and it's
this event that marks the beginning of the Islamic calendar.
In the first sub phase, it was permissible for Muslims
to fight, but only by those who were specifically being persecuted,
and only against those specifically persecuting them. In the second
sub phase, obligatory defensive fighting was instituted to all Muslims
in order to protect the emerging and newly created Islamic state.
In the third and final subphase, obligatory offensive fighting was
instituted in order to spread Islam Mohammad conquers Mecca and
the colleagues after him spread Islam across Arabia and North
Africa using the sword. So now that Islam is established,
it has a stronghold in Medina. The Medeanan phase is
in full force. Jihad is offensive and its obligatory. Does
Islam teach that it is a peaceful religion? Yes, when
the Muslim community is in the Meccan phase, does Islam
teach that it is a violent religion? Yes, when the
Muslim community is in the Medean phase. Understanding Islam hinges
on understanding the interplay between the various phases. And remember
Kur'an thirty three twenty one says that Muslims are to
emulate Muhammad's own historical circumstances. So when Muslims preach that
Islam is a peaceful religion, what they are really telling
you is we are currently in the Meccan phase of
jihad against you. That's what it means. What they're telling
you that Islam is a peaceful religion, that they're too
weak to impose Islam on you, that they are currently
in the Meccan phase. These are not the opinions of
some random scholars. These are the official relied upon more
Palmmad positions and understandings of the recognized jurisprudential schools. There
is no getting around the fact that violent offensive jihad
is authentic Islam. Overt offensive hostile jihad with the intent
of global Islamization is the authentic expression of Islam legally
mandated by Islamic law Islamic law for an Islamic state.
As a Muslim belonging to an Islamic state, you do
not get to make up your own version of Islam.
When you, as a Muslim, live in an Islamic state,
you live according to Islamic law. It's not any different
to how when you live in whatever country in the world,
you live according to the laws of that respective country.
You don't get to make up your own law. Likewise,
the Muslim nonsense lying about Islam is a so called
peaceful religion. Sure, Islam is peaceful when you're in the
Meccan face, and Islam is also peaceful when you're Muslim
living in an Islamic state. But when you do not
want to be Muslim, then you have no choice but
to abide by Islamic law. When living in an Islamic
state and jihad forcibly imposes Islamic society upon everyone. Upon
reaching non Islamic territory, the advancing Muslim army must first
invite the non Muslim inhabitants dwelling there to accept Islam.
Should they reject Islam, then they are to be fought,
and if they are idolators, they're to be killed. But
if they're what's known as the people of the book,
the Akhlqitab, meaning Christians and Jews, than they are to
be subjugated. But subjugation, according to Islamic law, means that
Muslims are to purposefully humiliate the Christians and Jews. It
is not sufficient for the Akhalqitab to merely pay the
require jizia, but they must do so in a humiliating way.
So when you hear Muslim apologists, they'll say, well, the
Muslims they have to pay the cop so would they
have to give obligatory charity? Well, the non Muslims they
pay the jizia. It's just the exact same thing. No,
it's not the exact same thing. The amount that Muslims
will pay is much lower the amount that non Muslims
pay the jizia is much higher. But more importantly, the
payment is done in a humiliating way.
Speaker 3: And that's the point I want to remind everybody real quick.
Kai if you want to support the stream, you can
pay your jizya in the super chats by sending in
superchats by stream labs. That stream labs link is pin
in the chat. You can also superchat natively through YouTube
as well. Go ahead, awesome.
Speaker 2: Yeah, So Islamic law is very clear on this point.
The jizya that non Muslims pay to the Islamic state,
it's not about the money itself. In Islamic claw is
very clear, it's not about the money, it's about the
pain of it done in a humiliating way, meaning in
a way demonstrating that Muslims are superior. So it's it's
an example of psychological warfare on non Muslims, Jihad established.
Speaker 3: That's a great point too, to keep that in mind,
that it's not just getting you know, monetary advantage, it's
it's psychological warfare and deracination.
Speaker 2: Yep. Yeah, And that's going to be very very important
with regards to the psychological warfare. Especially the one book
that I have there that I want to talk about
at some point, it's the FBI agent. He talks about
the psychological profile of people who become jihadis and how
basically they're psychologically manipulated into the jihadi cause of various groups,
whether it's like isis alter and everything. So Islam has
within it built a lot of psychological warfare aspects to it.
So jihad also establishes fundamental inequality between Muslims and non Muslims.
For example, in an Islamic state, it is not permissible
for non Muslims to be judges over Muslims or to
give testimony against Muslims in a court of law. So
your Muslim living in the non Muslim country that tells
you Islam is a peaceful religion, he has no other
means but to submit to the law of the land
that is now currently in effect that is not Islamic.
And if he was to now become in the majority
and establish Islamic law, well he's going to tell you
we don't have fundamental equality. You cannot be a judge,
you cannot witness against me. So basically it's my word
against yours, and the Islamic court will always judge in
my favor. It is not permitted for non Muslims to
carry weapons, and non Muslims must wear distinct clothing to
set them apart from Muslims. These are just some of
the things that I listen.
Speaker 3: Does that distinct clothing allow you to have drip or
is that a no drip humiliation clothing.
Speaker 2: No, you have to still abide by their customs. It's
and you will actually see in regions where Islam was
historically prevalent, and that may not be prevalent today, certain
areas like in Bosnia, for example, that has been under
the influence of the Ottomans. So you will see a
lot of distinct clothing that even Christians will wear, but
that has very much Islamic influence. But it's not exactly
the same. It's similar, but it's distinguished in such a
way that sets sets them apart. So it's still abiding
by Islamic norms, but it's setting them apart so that
any Muslim can look at that person and say, Okay,
we know that that is a Jew, we know that
that is a Christian, we know that they're not they're
not Muslims. And this was mandatory. So the next time
you hear a Muslim preacher say that Islam is a
peaceful religion, ask him or her is Islam an equitable religion?
Does Islam consider the non Muslim the same as the Muslim?
Are you talking about Islam during the Meccan phase or
the Medeon phase? And there are your sources right there.
You can just throw that in their face when they
lie to you. Islamic law is also very clear that
jihad persists until the day of resurrection yam Ol Kayama.
The Islamic mindset reflects a binary distribution of the world
DoD aal Islam meaning the region of Islam, the lands
that are peaceful because they are under Islamic rule, and
the dadal harb the region of war, meaning the lands
that need to be conquered and subjugated under Islamic rule
through offensive jihad. So anyone who tells you that Islam
is a peaceful religion or that jihad is just a
private spiritual struggle that you engage in the comfort of
your own home is lying to you, is ignorant, and
or is delusional. So called quote unquote moderate Islamic leaders
denounce Muslims to engage in violent, offensive jihad as extremists
and tell us that they do not represent authentic Islam,
that they hijacked Islam, that Islam is a peaceful religion.
In reality, these so called moderates are silently waging a
stealthy jihad behind the scenes from within society. They are
diverting your attention so you do not see the cultural
violence they are waging. The moderates are not attempting to assimilate,
but rather infiltrate and take over. Both the so called
moderates and extremists work together to bring about the same
end result. When discussing jihad, it is inevitable to come
across terms such as political Islam, radical Islam, fundamentalist Islam,
extremist Islam used by Muslims and non Muslims alike. But
the term political Islam is misleading because one may think
that Islam can either be categorized so as to not
consist of any political elements proper, or that Islam is
a religion that can be politicized. In fact, Islam is
at its very foundation political. There is no aspect of
Islam that is not political.
Speaker 3: This is important to note because many people in the
West assume that these other people groups or these other
religions have an Enlightenment assumption like we do, this idea
that there is a separation between the secular society and
the religious elements, and that's not true. So just like
in the ancient medieval world, Christianity believed that there was
a governance of the state that applied to theology, that
applied to the church, so both were in symphonia. But
there is a duty that the state has to God,
so it was theocratic. Modern, post Enlightenment, post scientific revolution,
Western civilization has left the idea of theocracy or anything
like the state having a duty to God. And now
we're faced with a religion with a billion plus people
that does believe in theocracy to some extent. And that's
precisely why we have to understand that you can't have
this idea that they're going to integrate, they're going to assimilate,
they're going to jibe with classical libertarian principles. It's preposterous,
right right.
Speaker 2: So to give an example, so consider this, if you,
as a Muslim apostatized from Islam, then it is the
obligation of the caliph or his deputy or his representative
to execute you right here, if you, as a non Muslim,
are called to accept Islam and you refuse, then it
is the Caliph or his deputy who wages war on
you and who can impose themitude on you, the head
tax with corresponding societal societal subjugation, inferior social status, and
explicit social stigmatization. But the Kaliphate is a religious political institution,
and the Kaliph is a political figure exercising authority for
a religious purpose. The dominance of Islam. It's a theocratic institution,
and it is very important from the outset not to
get caught up in the mindset that one can supposedly
divorce Islam from politics. Any attempt to understand geopolitics in
the Islamic world and among Muslims at large is to
recognize that Islam is a religious system that at its
core is inherently political. An extension to the central tenet
are also the various connotations associated with the terms mentioned
radical fundamentalist extremists, as if to suggest that offensive jihad,
especially through violent means, is not an authentic expression of Islam.
This kind of thinking is contrary to historical Islam, both
in the way it was practiced by Muhammad himself and
as well by the succeeding generations of Muslims for the
past fourteen centuries. In reality, people who are deemed radical
or fundamentalist or extremists are in actuality observant Muslims. They
are practicing Islam the way it is meant to be practiced.
While the overwhelming vast majority of Muslims may confine their
religious observances to things like praying, fasting, giving charity, making
the pilgrimage to Mecca, and are otherwise peaceful, the fact
that the overwhelming majority do not practice offensive jihad, at
least not in an overtly recognizable and physically violent manner,
does not negate the validity and obligation to do so.
All it means is that the overwhelming majority of Muslims
feel that they are still in the Meccan phase and
the so called extremists are jeopardizing their efforts by prematurely
acting out in overt hostility as if they are in
the Medenon phase. To help you better contextualize jihad, because
at this point it's kind of been a little bit
theoretical just telling you really what jihada is about, let's
contextualize Jihad considering the following thought experiment. I call it
the Jihad thought experiment. So as I'm reading this, just
kind of try to play it in your mind from
the vantage point of the narrative. So, a Muslim army
is approaching to invade and conquer the non Islamic territory
in which you live. For whatever reason, you accept the
invitation to Islam and become Muslim, thereby protecting your life.
Once the Muslim conquest is achieved, however, your wife refuses
to accept Islam and does not become Muslim. With you
not being knowledgeable in the details of Islamic law, you
believe your non Muslim wife is safe because she is
your wife and you're now a Muslim. You might even
think of her as your property. It is only after
the Muslim conquest that you find out that, according to
Islamic law, a wife does not automatically follow her husband
into Islam. This means that she is part of the
spoils of war, specifically under faith. In other words, an
invading Muslim may rightfully claim her for himself as war booty. Now, you,
being a good Muslim convert, attend the compulsory Friday congregational prayer.
To conclude the prayer, you turn your head to the
side and say the compulsory a slam marleykum la, marleykum
Peace be upon you to the Muslim who is now
raping your wife. That is jihad, that is Islam, that
is Islam. Fay Bouti stems from the Qur'an itself, and
it conveys the general notion of restoration. Everything in the
world is for the benefit of Muslims, and anyone who
opposes this state of affairs is actually a usurper of
the inherent rights of the Muslim community as a whole. Hence,
transfer of things and persons to Muslims is restoration of
the correct state of affairs. In other words, the Muslim
community is to prosper at the expense of naw Muslims,
and the transfer reflects this inherent Islamic world order. Let
it be very clear, Islamic law does not require there
to be compassion for the Muslim convert to retain his
non Muslim wife. Compassion is for the jihadi because Islam
promises him non Muslim women as war booty, even though
the husband is a Muslim convert.
Speaker 3: Let's read a couple superchas real quick here, just to
kind of catch up, because there's quite a few that
have kind of come in. So forty Christs were five dollars.
Do you think the ngel could be the Wisdom of
Sirak mixed with Christ the Teacher icon a physical book
written by a man named Jesus, mixed with Jesus the Messiah.
I don't think so. I think we kind of have
a general outline of what Muhammad was influenced by from
you know, people like Saint John Damascus and others, that
it's more so Nestorian ideology and Aryan ideology, even according
to the Oxford Handbook of Islam. So I don't really
think there was a lot of influence from iconography. But
there's also elements that we don't know. Do you have
any comments on that.
Speaker 2: I would just say I think there's good reason to
believe that the form of the Engel that the early
Islamic community and Muhammad himself would have been aware of,
it is possible that it might be the Dietessadon. So
this was a version of the four Gospels kind of
put together as one gospel, taking.
Speaker 3: The Nars that was Tation, was it?
Speaker 2: I think, so don't quote me on it.
Speaker 3: Okay, well, it was one of I think one of
the students of Justin Martyr, Saint Justin Martyr, and these
are the logos apologists. But I think if I recall,
the dietest run has like heterodox elements and I'm going
for memory.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, exactly, And so I mean, I don't think
the teston even if that was what they understood to
be the Angail, I don't think that was their only
source of knowledge of Christianity. I mean, I think there's
a very very strong case to make that Mohammed was
very much influenced, but it was Europeans. It was.
Speaker 3: Yeah, let me read this real quick. So it was
the compilation by Tait, who was an early logos apologist,
Tation of fortuly I, unfortunately, I'm pretty sure fell into heresy.
But this was the compilation around one s ad attempting
to give a kind of an early Gospel harmony, and
it was created in the Syriac language. So anyway, go ahead.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So, and then that's I think kind of the
die test on the fact that it was just one
book gave the idea that the jail is just one,
one single, one single book. So did you want to
go to any more super chats? Do you have anymore?
Speaker 3: Yeah, we got some more. Let's see Doath became a member?
What's up? Man? Forty Crush says no, we did that one.
Dan Dantella Bella fifty dollars, Thank you so much. Have
you noticed that a lot of the anti Israeli right
wingers become very pro Islamic in their messaging. Yes, I've
been talking about this for the last two or three years,
because the Saudis and other people will fund and put
money behind people on the right wing. So you look
at the tapes, they start pushing Islam. This happens after
he meets with Saudi people. I don't know for sure,
but I'm just speculating. You get these influencers like Lily j.
H pushing Islam with just absolutely no knowledge of anything whatsoever.
But she's a hot blonde and so people follow it.
So they're absolutely putting billions of dollars. Actually, the Saudis,
according to Bloomenthal's book, in the last twenty years, at
the billions of dollars into building moss and Islamic centers
all throughout the United States. So yes, they are putting
money into these right wing figures you mentioned Tucker. I mean,
I'm hoping to, you know, hopefully we can sway Tucker
in the right direction. He does have an interest in
Orthodox Christianity. He's met with Father Peter Hearers and they've
had some discussions. I know that Tucker has read some
books that we recommended, like I know that he has
in his possession some Father Surf and Rose books. So
I'm not so sure about the Katari thing. It wasn't
actually Qatar. It was a an Iranian who ran that
investment firm. It wasn't a Katari or a Pakistani excuse me.
It was an Iranian Pakistani guy who runs that and
that includes Jewish investors as well. It includes it's Donald
Trump Junior. So the story about Tucker being funded by
Qatar is not exactly accurate, but we definitely want to
make sure that they don't. I mean, it was it
was unfortunate the second half of Tucker's talk at the
what was a sea pack or whatever, where it got
into this sort of pro You know, well, if if
Bebe's bad, then Islam's got to be good, Okay, we
got to be more sophisticated than this. This is just
so low tier basic dialectical manipulation. Now, Christianity is the
real enemy, and Islam and Judaism are both absolutely opposed.
And by the way, Islam's origins are actually also very Talmudic,
and people don't understand that. Do you have any comments
on that.
Speaker 2: About the talmudic aspect?
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, well that and the false dialectic of
well if if you know these people who are anti Israel,
so therefore they must be good because they're Muslims.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, I've I've made them multiple communit posts on
this false dialectic that it's like, it's not like a
good versus bad or like the lesser of two evils.
This is just like evil on both sides. And as
a Christian, you should not be supporting either of these
two parties, either of these two sides. But that's something
I think we can kind of unravel in a future stream,
because I specifically do want to talk about Israel and
Hamas and the interplay there. I have one slide that
I'm going to finish this presentation just talking specifically about that.
But I think that would be a very more appropriate
venue to talk about why it's a false false dialectic.
Speaker 4: Okay, yeah, the other one was what was the other
in a common I'm going to it.
Speaker 2: That was.
Speaker 3: That was the essence of the forty fIF I actually
have some bitcoin shekels. I'm too autistic and retorted to
understand it. Well, you don't have to be some sort
of tech dork genius to understand or be interested in bigcoin.
This is my bigcoin wallet right here. If you want
to support the show through bigcoin, you can do it
right there with that QR code and you get started
with bitcoin in the show description with the swine bigcoin link.
It is a bitcoin only company. There's no other cryptos,
there's no mean coins or whatever. It's bitcoin only. Let's see,
we got fish in a tie two dollars. Mohammed was
an Abyssinian bishop under King A Braha. Never heard that, so,
I don't know, have you ever heard that? Sounds like
a legend.
Speaker 2: No, I just it's nonsense. I think I think he's
just trying. He's connecting dots that don't that don't exist.
Speaker 3: Hold on, there's a little more. Did you want to
say something before I go on? No, go ahead, I'm
not your buddy. Five dollars unrelated. I was curious if
you've played anymore Alan Wake too. I did. In fact,
I got through the next part because I was I was.
I ended up getting into it and I didn't stream it,
so but I mean, there's more of it if you
guys want me to do some more Alan Wake. He says,
it was surprisingly hilarious when you were doing it from
the perspective of Candice Owens. I'm glad you thought it
was funny. Carlos five dollars. I'm paying my Jizia, my
jay Z. I think you and Raymond Ibraheim would be
a great collaboration. He's written many books on these topics
against Islam.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and Raymond Ibrahim he actually did a few weeks ago,
a month ago. Very recently, he did a talk on
trigonometry talking about Islam, covering a lot of stuff that
I'm talking about as well. He's taking it very much
more heavily on the historical aspect. But I would highly
recommend you guys to check to check out that interview.
Speaker 3: And we got search out here from in memoir. Ten
dollars here have some jizzyhh, I get it a good one.
We got more. Let's see Crusader, what's up? Can you
remember fish? None of your business? Five dollars? Liberal support
Islam to be in the top ten percent, this has
to be one of the top ten percent most incoherent positions.
It's even worse, no one should actually be supporting Islam. Well,
there's many reasons why they do that. This is the
Red Green alliance. The left supports it because they, I mean,
there's the layer of the scams that we've seen coming
out with the Somali's and these people in Minnesota. So
there's a there's a layer of scammery that goes on
with stealing the money and bringing these people in and
you get a cut. There's the overall game plan of
the replacement of Western peoples that is mentioned explicitly in
the Colergi Plan and then even more.
Speaker 2: Recently talking about that, I'm going to be talking that
about that exactly.
Speaker 3: Even more recently, it's been restated with bankers like what
was that guy's name, Summers, the European banker, that Islam
will help to destroy the European civilization. General Wesley Clark
even said that Europe would have to be destroyed through
the migration techniques. All the Fabian socialists said that Islam
would be the way to take down Europe to install
something amenable to socialism, and most of the early Fabian
socialists explicitly said, like Bert and Russell for example, Beatrist
in Sydney Webb said that Islam would be the tool
by which they would transition Europe into a socialist order
because they felt that Islam would be more amenable to
transitioning to socialism than Christianity would be. They're very explicit
about that, so there's many, many statements about this from
powerful Western elite peoples. This is also why the British
Crown is so pro Islam, yep.
Speaker 2: And that's actually what I'm going to be getting into.
Very like this kind of topic. Just one more slide
after this, Am I good to continue?
Speaker 3: Well, we got some more. Let me get some through
some more of these. And guys, remember I will donate
to Kai as well, so you're not just giving just
yet to me, it's also going to Lord Kai. Ponos
says two dollars. Did you read any of the prophecies
yet of Elder Afraam of Arizona? I have read some
of them. Off and on over the years. I know
there is some question as to how many are exactly authentic,
and I do think it's interesting, but I don't have
any hard set opinions on that. Kai. Do you have
any opinions on Elder or any prophecies relating to Islam.
Speaker 2: I haven't read anything about the prophecies, so I'm not
going to comment on that.
Speaker 3: And then we have Don Says for twenty dollars. Sorry
to digress agnostic here, but I'm a huge fan does
that Finacious Essays and John Damascus. I've done the Affenacious
Essays and I did Jhon Damascus. I think this is
a guy that called in the other day. Can you
recommend a book to help me understand religious philosophy? Well,
I mean, if I was an agnostic, I would start
with something like A Mind of God by Paul Davies.
I mean that's kind of about religious philosophy. You could
get a book like Yaroslav Pelican's book on Metamorphosis of
Natural Theology and the Cappadocians P. L. I K A N.
That will give you a philosophy of the Cappadocians. But
I'm not I can't think of a single religious philosophy book.
I'll tell my hand that would be like a good introduction.
But I'm glad that you found those books to be interesting.
Oh you already read Love. You said you read Mind
of God. Okay, yeah, it's hard to I mean, well, actually,
John Damascus has a book called Feunt of Knowledge and
it's just laying out the philosophical terms to uses. So
that might be the closest thing to a patristic introduction
to philosophy religion. But that's all I could think about
the moment. Go ahead, guy, Yeah, all right.
Speaker 2: So I'm just going to finish up this slide here,
and then I've got one more slide on the Islamic
law stuff, and then we're going to change change gears,
and the next stuff is going to be a little
bit more more interesting. So just this whole concept of fae,
that type of war booty, and about taking the non
Muslim wife of the Muslim when the Muslims invade, invade
the land and conquer it. So it's also about teaching
the Muslim convert a very important general Islamic lesson, and
that is, everything that is in the possession of non
Muslims must be transferred to Muslims. That is the will
of the law and the natural order of the world.
And so the act of transference of one's wife teaches
this very very lesson, and with that the new Muslim
convert prepares to wage jihad against non Muslims. And this
is how Islam naturally grows its army, how it naturally
sustains its growing army as it expands.
Speaker 3: Well, this also explains the attitude of a lot of
these people when they come into Western countries. And the
people in the Western countries are mystified by the way
that these people act. Yes, I'm speaking with regard to
grooming gangs and these kinds of things.
Speaker 2: Yep, yep. And it's not just grooming gangs like you have.
It's no joke. Those people who are from Germany, they
can attest to this, like, for example, you have signs
at swimming pools, at public swimming pools written in Arabic
that are like literal illustrations that it's not okay for
men to be walking into the female washrooms or to
physically touch females unwanted, and stuff like that. Like, these
people have to be taught these these cultural norms It's
like they come into these societies with a completely different,
different mindset, as if everything belongs to them. It's for
their taking. And that's what Islam fosters. It fosters this mentality,
non Muslim things and people, whatever it is, it's there
for your taking.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna let you keep going. I'm gonna run to
the restroom real quick and I'll be right back.
Speaker 4: You can keep going, right, no problem.
Speaker 2: So the modern jihad playbook is to collapse everything and
everyone critical of Islam and Muslims as islamophobia. So basically,
islam of phobia is the new sword for Muslims to
wage jihad, or by which Muslims will wage jihad. When
Muslims are militarily weak, then they wage what is called
civilization jihad. They migrate to non Islamic lands peacefully. They
refuse to integrate into the target society, get into positions
of power, reach critical mass and influence, and then take over,
all while crying islamaphobia against everyone who dares say or
do anything to inhibit them. In the event that Muslims
will never be an external military threat, they bank on
the prospect that the host country is unab to deal
with them as an internal threat. No one cares about
being labeled Islamophobic. That is a worn out, nonsensical mantra
that no one takes seriously. Everybody sees what Islamic communities
are doing, and they're calling bullshit on Islamophobia. They don't
want to live in Islamic style communities, they don't want
to be under Shariah, they don't want an Islamic state.
Islam inherently, at its very core, mandates the establishment of
an Islamic state. So it's not islamophobia, it's rejection of Islam.
People see through the bullshit. Now I'm must switch gears
so from the perspective of Muslims.
Speaker 3: Before we do that. Hold on, we got some more
super chats that have come in Djaya al day er
two dollars. Can you or Kai mention Kuran nine thirty
where Mohammad says Jews say that Ezra is the son
of Allah, and this is akin to Christians saying this
about Christ to justify fighting them. Where did Mohammad get
this idea? Well, you know, when I did the debate
with Hakikachu, we covered Gabriel site Reynolds's book, which covers
many of the fundamental mistakes that are made in the Koran,
and I would say that this is probably one of
those where there was some misunderstanding that you know, because
remember Mohammad is illiterate, so he's hearing this stuff and
coming to his own bizarre conclusions about who Ezra is
or what Christians believe. And you know, one of the
first videos Kai made was, for example, Islam's fundamental misunderstanding
of the Trinity, the deed of Christ and Mary. So
it's riddled with all kinds of basic mix ups. And
that's why the religion is so ridiculous, is that it's
usually going back in a revisionist way to try to
make sense of and sort of create a new story
that makes all this stuff work together. So could you
comment on that.
Speaker 2: Kai, Yeah, I mean, just I'm myself. I don't know
where exactly they got this idea that Ezra is the
son of God. No clue. That is just one oddity
that I haven't come across any good, any good explanation
other than the assertion.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, and it shows like just fundamentally fundamental mistakes.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, oh yeah, But just to comment, like just
in general, like one of the things that I've done.
I've made several community posts on this, and I've made
some videos as well, where when you look at the
earliest Islamic commentators, they're all just kind of baffled to
explain Christian doctrine, and so then you just see them
like literally inventing beliefs that Christians didn't have. And it's
funny because when you read the commentators, they're like trying
to be understanding of the different Christian sects that exists.
Like they will identify the Melkites being the Orthodox, they'll
call them, the Jacobites being the Monophysites, they identify the Nestorians,
and they name these groups by name, and they're saying, oh,
this group believes this, this group believes that whatever, And
it's just the absolute nonsense, Like they clearly don't understand
what any of these groups believe in, what differentiates the
two groups. So if the commentators themselves are having difficulty
and making so many ridiculous blunders, then it's no wonder
that Muhammad himself blundered just whatever stories he would hear.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and people should understand too, like you know, this
is really important information. I'll you guys understand this is
really like a college or a graduate school introductory lecture
to Islam and geopolitics. And you know, you don't get
this in the West, in American education, in the university system.
For example, I had a college undergraduate history class on
the history of Islam and it was all just like
selling it. It was promoting it, and you don't get
this kind of an unfiltered, you know, KI level approach.
So I hope you guys appreciate this and you're getting
real information, you know, while we at least have some
of the freedom here on YouTube to be able to
do it. So if you guys want to, please support
the stream, and I will also be supporting Kai as
well with this none of your business ten dollars. Basically,
when an Islamist says that islamis peace, well, what they're
really saying is this is a Jedi mind trick. The
Islamic laws you're looking for. Correct to quote Obi Wan Kenobi,
that is absolutely correct.
Speaker 4: Yep uh.
Speaker 3: Meme one. Memo one says for ten dollars, the left
is pro Islamic, especially these girls should read the book
Camp of the Saints. It will not go well for them. Yeah,
it's funny you said that because I wasn't really aware
of this book until I think Snack mentioned it one
day and I was like, that's interesting, what is that book?
And I think it predicts the sort of destruction of Europe,
doesn't it through Islam and these kinds of things.
Speaker 4: Kaeda, No, I haven't come across across that book.
Speaker 3: It's a fit. It's a fix. It's a kind of
a well known fiction book, and it's a like a dystopia.
I think I haven't read it, but I remember Snack
talking about it, and it talks about let's see what
it says, controversial nineteen seventy three French dystopian novel where
the collapse of the West happens through Islamic migration. Wow,
so they were here. You have in nineteen seventy three
fiction novel predicting it. That's crazy.
Speaker 4: Go ahead, Yeah, all right, So now.
Speaker 2: We're going to switch gears. And so the first part
of the presentation, it was from the perspective of Muslims,
Islam teaching them to wage jihad, and that Muslims have
a religious obligation to dominate the world, from the perspective
of the New World Order, and I'm just kind of
using that as a catch all phrase.
Speaker 3: Okay, well I'm gonna have to bidh for a second here,
not at you, but so again to people in the
chat when you come with this low tier bull crap
that you're pro Zionists because you're not calling out that's
not true. You can find countless critiques of Zionism or
been in Judaism on my channel. So if you come
with these lies, I'm immediately blocking you. Go ahead, yep, yep.
Speaker 2: So yeah, the New World Order, I'm just using it
as a catch all phrase. That's a phrase that's been
around for a very, very long time. It's just basically
like meaning like those people and elements who have the
financial means, influence, and power to affect global geopolitics. Okay,
for the New World Order, the Muslims are to be
exploited for their nefarious purposes, manipulating them like pawns on
a global chessboard. So now we're going to start unraveling
how in the world can you get people at this
global level who have this influence who are clearly themselves
not Muslims, wanting to support Muslims in the establishment of Islam, Like,
how can you reconcile all this like, this doesn't make
any sense, So I'm going to start unraveling all of this.
Speaker 3: Again. I cannot fathom how stupid some of these people
in the chat are. Just do not even come here.
I literally just told you that I critique Zionism and
Islam and Judaism and they're both in enemies of Christianity.
I literally said it like an hour ago, and you're
literally in the chat calling me a Zionist jujus moviist.
I will kick all of you. Are going to get
booted right away if you say the stupid shit over
and over. No, I'm sick of it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you just have to even go onto my community posts.
I've written very clearly of what is the problem with Zionism,
that this is not something that we support. As an
orthodox Christian, you should not be supporting Zionism. I'm very
clear on this, and I'm trying to hammer home the
point that don't fall into this false dialectic. Don't think
that because we're criticizing Islam that we're now supporting Zionism, or.
Speaker 3: That if we're oh so basically you're saying that you
love na Yahoo, that's all your sky is getting seven
thousand BB bucks for making this lecture here. That's it.
That's what's going on. Right and well, also, by the way,
so basically, you you don't like Sneako because you love Bib, Right,
that's your only options. You either love Sneako or you're
with nun Yahoo.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's just low tier, low tier garbage. So the
non Islamic New World Order remarkably aligns with a lot
of core Islamic elements that devalues life and is destructive
to the family unit. Okay, so the kind of societal
degradation that the New World Order pushes, especially in advanced societies,
is endorsed by Islam. As ironic as that may sound.
For example, consider the following elements that are destructive to
the family unit and that devalue life in Islam, and
you will see them being embraced by the New World Order.
So first, abortion, So, according to the prevalent opinion of
the Hanafi school, abortion is permitted within the first one
hundred and twenty days after conception, since the fetus does
not have a soul during this period. Now, other opinions,
other schools, they may say, well the timeframe is forty days,
or it might be whatever it is. They put some
other number, but let's just take one hundred and twenty
days as kind of like the maximal period, if you will.
And since the death of a person is the separation
of soul from body, and there is no soul at
this point, meaning there is no person, then there is
no death of a person. Okay, So this is very important.
You see, in the degenerate mindset in the West that
promotes abortion, there is this reluctancy to identify the fetus
as a person, as a human being, and Islam aligns
with that mentality. It goes hand in hand divorce. Marriage
in Islam is just a contract that can be very
easily dissolved. There's no sanctity or holiness to marriage. I
remember even reading in one of the Islamic law books
it's basically saying it's just very blunt. Is the saying
is that marriage is what makes sexual intercourse. Listen, that's
basically the whole reason for marriage. But obviously marriage has
other kinds of responsibilities as well, promisecuity. Now, among the
Shia there is muta and among the Sunnis there is monsieur.
Speaker 3: You, son of the devil, You are committing your mother
is committing muta with the Shia, and that's how you
got here, your son of the devil. I just had
to do a little scam. I had to do a
little scam. Shamou interlude here when you said muta, that.
Speaker 2: Was perfect right on point. Yeah, that was that was great.
But basically the idea here is both camps Shia and
Sunny they have fake marriages for the sakes of sex
with minimal to no commitments. Now a lot of people
will be familiar with muta from the Shia side, and
muta is something that was explicitly.
Speaker 3: Look a look at Kai manifesting, the demons manifesting in
kai right now, Wow, manifesting manifesting is.
Speaker 2: So yes. So muta was practiced during the time of Muhammad.
The Sunnis will say that it was annulled. The Shia
will say, no, it was never annulled. It is still
valid and they will practice it to today. But the
Sunnis they want to get the benefits that the Shia have,
so they just do a lot of mental gymnastics and
they will call it missia. And so you guys can
look that up and you can read up about it.
But it's basically just fake marriages so that you can
have sex with no commitments polygyny. So Muslim men are
permitted up to four wives and as many concubines as
he wants. Islamic law forbids the wives to cohabit together.
This is a very important point. So under Islamic law,
a Muslim man who has four wives, those four wives
are legally mandated that they must not live together in
the same roof. They can be on the same property,
but they cannot be living under the same roof. And
what's the reason given so that their menstrual cycles do
not align. This is so that the husband can have
sex whenever he so desires. So there you see this
prevalence of giving to sexual desires sexual pleasures in Islam,
as you see in the West where everything is so
hyper sexual. Some other examples pedophilia. So we see that.
Speaker 3: Now, remember, ky, we are on YouTube. So uh b,
let's let's you know, try to use terminology that won't
because the problem is that the algorithm will just sort
of bury it. Yeah, So let's okay, let's say things
like PDF or you know, okay, pdf okay, and then
unalive and t R A.
Speaker 2: And Z right, okay, all right, I'll do my best.
Speaker 3: Just PDF is right, because again it's okay, it's all algorithmic,
and we don't want the stream to just die. As
soon as it's it's done, you know what I mean,
it'll get demonetized as well. So just try to use
the terms.
Speaker 2: Okay, all right, So maybe I can just kind of
summarize it so you guys can see the slides what's
written up there and so the idea here and I've
done the videos on this where the I don't even
know what words I can use. Jay, I don't want to.
Speaker 3: Let me summarize it. So according to Islamic law, you
have in the first situation PDF, it is permissible to
have marriage with what is it nine and under with Ayisha?
Speaker 2: Right? Is that?
Speaker 3: Is that the age or is it even younger?
Speaker 2: It's even younger, So.
Speaker 3: It's even younger. We'll there's no stipulated age. We'll We'll
stop there because the other parts we can't really talk about.
T R A n Z. Everybody should know that this
is very promoted. In fact, Iran is one of the
world hubs of this reassignment surgery. And then in the
case of unliving it is permissible in the situations of war. Uh,
and thus you get the unliving b O m B people.
So is that sufficient to cover kind of what's on
the screen.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's fine, And the slide is up there so
people can read it to fill in the details of that.
But I do apologize that I did say that one word.
Speaker 3: It's okay, It's just we wanted to stay in the
algorithm as all.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I get it. But basically the whole point here
is I'm giving you examples that shows how the New
World Order is systematically breaking down the nuclear family.
Speaker 3: Unit and aiding this is a great tool for it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, aiding Muslims, this is the tool to globally dominate
traditionally powerful countries.
Speaker 3: Now yeah, and like Rachel said, what are we all
being fed? Oh, Islam is beazed, it's trad it's right wing.
That's all of these idiot mouthpieces out there that everybody's
listening to, like sneak O and Tates. They're all buying
into this idea. Oh Islam tread and no it's not.
As you can see, this is what it really is.
Speaker 2: Yep, yep.
Speaker 3: Now this is going to by the way, as somebody
also pointed out, Kai isn't it also the case that
cousin marriage is allowable as well, which leads to the
inbred lo Iq stuff.
Speaker 2: Well, well, welcome to the new slide. Welcome to this
next slide. We're talking about and Andrew Wilson, I think
will appreciate this slide given his debate with Hakikachu on
the topic. So the thing here is is that Muslims
are easy to manipulate and control like globally like from
the powers they Islam fosters stupidity and inbreeding, and Muslim
majority countries consistently rank the highest worldwide for consanguinous marriage
per capita. So I've listed some some countries there with
their percentages. Have given you the link. You can go
and see other countries reason in comparison. But you have
at the top of the list Pakistan sixty one percent,
So that means sixty one percent of the Pakistanis who
are married are likely cousins sixty one percent, And you
look at the other countries fifty four percent, fifty one percent,
fifty percent. So chances are quite high that a person
who comes from a Muslim background, like a native Muslim background,
that their parents are probably cousins and chances are that
they'll probably marry a cousin as well. And this is
very significant because inbreeding correlates to lower intelligence. There's proof
for this, and this is an article that appears in Nature,
and I'll just quote you what the findings are. He says,
I have now examined the effects of inbreeding on cognitive
performance in an Arab population with a high rate of
consanguinous marriage, which minimize the distortions due to non genetic variables.
I show here that offspring of unrelated parents performed better
than offspring of first cousin marriages in intelligence and achievement
tests administered at grades four and six. The lowest level
of performance and the higher variants were found for offspring
of double cousin marriages. The inbreeding depression found in this
study is consistent and cannot be explained by the effects
of socioeconomic status. End quote. Basically, when the entire world
is stupid and inbred, then it is easier to control.
Speaker 3: And am in exactly. So it's a perfect religion for
the globalists.
Speaker 2: Yep. So now let's see what Muslims themselves say. So
cousin marriage is not only permitted in Islam, but it
is encouraged. Shikh ibn Baz was asked, I read something
that said marry non relatives lest you have unhealthy children.
Is it a sahikadith? He replied, this has no basis. Rather,
it is better to marry relatives, as the prophet gave
his daughter in marriage to some of his relatives. As
for the view of some jurists, there is no basis
for it. Rather, it is optional. If a man wants
to marry relatives such as his paternal cousin or a
maternal cousin, or if he wants to marry a non relative,
there is nothing wrong with that. As for the view
of those who say that marriage to a non relative
will produce more intelligent children and is better, there is
no basis for that and no evidence to support it.
If there is a relative who is good, it is
more appropriate to marry her, and a marriage to her
may be regarded as upholding ties of kinship. But if
there is a non relative who is better looking and
better in character, then marrying a non relative is better.
Speaker 3: In other words, I can attest to all this I
custa being true from my own personal experiences of seven
years of debating the Muslims now and the inability, for example,
for any of them to restate what a hypothetical is.
Feel free to go ahead, Kai, Oh you're laughing.
Speaker 2: I was like that, he tell you it's just so true, Jay,
It's just so true.
Speaker 3: Do you remember that there was a six hour live
stream where we had all of these Muslims for six
hours straight and there was not one who could restate
just simply what the argument was, not do you believe it?
They couldn't even think about it, Like, but I don't
believe that. I know you don't believe that, but can
you just restate what the argument is? I don't believe that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Zach and Ike. But in other words, so Muslims
are taught from Muslims themselves. So this is not like
us projecting. This is Muslims themselves teaching other Muslims that
there is no connection whatsoever with inbreeding and intelligence and
encouraging people to marry their cousins. It's like they say,
it's a good thing. Look at our prophet. We're supposed
to emulate our profit. We're supposed to do what Muhammad did,
and he engaged in cousin marriages. He allowed that he
encouraged that. I mean, this is the mentality that you're
dealing with. These are the people that you're dealing with.
This is the result of this generational inbreeding that you're
dealing with. When you're dealing with Muslim dawa, when you're
dealing with doaw organdists, when you're dealing with these Muslim preachers,
this is what you're dealing with. So this goes hand
in hand with the so called birth gap problem fueled
by the breaking down of the nuclear family unit, which
is leading to global depopulation. So this is really important.
The global population is set to significantly decline in the
coming decades, including in Western countries. This is due to
people delaying reproducing until later in life, typically due to
emphasizing personal career development, but also due to socioeconomic difficulties
to raise a family earlier and the societal degeneration and
eroding of traditional values. So the breakdown of the family unit,
the number of younger people in the workforce is proportionately
is proportionally decreasing compared to the age population. This has
serious consequences as there are fewer younger people to economically
support an increasing aging population.
Speaker 3: Let me ask you a question here, Kai, we have
some questions in the chat which could be worth responding to.
How would you respond to somebody who says, well, but
wait a minute, how come the Ottomans were able to
build an empire and they weren't all, you know, married
to cousins, and they did some you know, successes with
a civilization. How would you respond to that?
Speaker 2: So the Ottomans were nominally Muslims.
Speaker 3: Not this is why other Muslims went to war against them.
Speaker 2: Yes, and Muslims may not even be aware of this,
or maybe they are. I don't know that of the
Ottoman sultans, not a single sultan in the entire history
of the Ottoman Empire, to my no, to my recollection
of reading the sources, not a single sultan ever made
hadj to Mecca, not a single one of them.
Speaker 3: Well, and they didn't. They also kind of have How
can we put this brigades of young men two?
Speaker 2: What do you mean? Brigades of oh oh yes, yes, yes, yes,
so in other words, yeah, yeah, yah.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they weren't. They were not very serious about that.
Another way, I think for the for the sultans, Islam
was just a political tool.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it was a political tool, and it was a
tool that they themselves.
Speaker 3: I mean, but buddies, that's the word I'm looking for.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they could use the populace, like Islam as a
tool to manipulate the populace. They could try to frame
certain issues as being Islamically valid, like one of the ones.
And I did a video on this fracture side. So
when when the father dies, which of the sons would
become the new sultan? And so then you would have
the one son like killing off all of his brothers.
And so now the idea was, well, how do we
justify this under Islamic law? And so it's more of
kind of like looking for the resolution to the problem
at hand and kind of like doing a lot of
mental gymnastics to justify it. But you look at the Ottomans,
they were they themselves were not really Muslims.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so all right, let's be clear here. So people
are saying, well, now, wait a minute, previous popes, medieval popes,
et cetera, they didn't think that they were nominal. You're
missing the point. It doesn't mean that the Ottomans didn't
go to war and use Islam as a tool. It
means that they were not serious about it in the
way that Salafi Sunni Islam considers. You have to take Islam.
This is why Sunnis have fought against Ottomans. Stop being
solo iq in the chat.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the Ottomans they used Islam like the Okay, let's
say the general population of Turks under the Ottoman Empire,
they would be let's say, very devout and religious. We're
talking about the Cologs. So we're talking about the Sultans.
We're talking about the leaders. These people who were leading
the state, who were governing the state, they themselves were
just using Islam as a political tool, rather than having
like this personal conviction that they were like these devout,
devout Muslims. Okay, they would drink alcohol, they would they
would do.
Speaker 3: A lot, they had pleasure boys. Again, this was the
point I'm making, is that the Sultans are not taking
this seriously. We're not talking about the people living in
the Ottoman Empire.
Speaker 2: Yeah, but I didn't put Turkey on the list. But
Turkey is also I think twenty some percent into Key
are inbred, would fall under the statistics. So it's not
like that they're not negligible. They are. They have a
presence they're just not as highly prominent as the other nations. Yeah,
I mean they expanded the Ottoman Empires. They did a
lot of integration of lands that they conquered. They had
a lot of people that they captured sent back to
Turkey to in the heartlands of Ottoman Empire, and that
they were basically having a little bit more genetic diversity
than some of the more isolated regions in smaller places.
But did you want to read any more questions?
Speaker 3: Or yeah, so we've got a couple of super chests,
Theorign Thorn Shield five dollars. Please read Genesis sixteen twelve.
It's where it says that Ishmael will be like a
wild man. Does that not accurately describe Muslims? Hey? Remember
a New Mecca was in Chronicles of Ritic. Was this subliminal?
I don't know. I don't know if I've ever been
seen Riddick, so I can't speak to that. But I
definitely think that there's some reason why. I don't remember
why scam shamou thinks that Genesis sixteen and Hagar and
Ishmael isn't talking about Islam. I think it's because it's
referring to Arab peoples, but there could still be some
future sort of implicit reference to Islam within Genesis sixteen.
I mean, it could go either way, but I do
think that it describes the warlike attitude of Ishmael and
his descendants obviously, So I do think Genesis sixteen twelve
is describing the tendencies of the Arab peoples to be
against everyone and to be so warlike.
Speaker 2: What do you think, Kai, Yeah, I don't really have
any strong opinions on this. I think there is at
one point in the Old Testament Room Testament, I don't
remember where that I think the Ishmaelites are distinguished from
the Arabs, so they're it's not a one to one
identity explicitly, but I mean whatever.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, they're called though in our tradition the Hagarens.
The Orthodox tradition is oftentimes called these people the Hagarens,
which would be the descendants of Hagar So there's some
connection there.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, I myself wouldn't necessarily say that. I
would say that we can call them the Hagarins as
a term that they themselves identify where they come from.
So just for the sake of simplicity we just granted
to them, not necessarily that we can agree with it.
I mean, even within Muslim sources themselves, they cannot trace
Muhammad's lineage to Hagar, to Ishmael. They can't. They cannot
trace it. And I think there were hadiths that say,
do not trace the lineage further than such and such
person or whatever. But it's that claim that Mohammed descends
from Ishmael or from Hagar, if you will, is just
a legend even within Islamic sources.
Speaker 3: Well, if you look up hagarens, it says that it's
an old Syriac term used early on in Coptic, Orthodox, Greek, Orthodox,
and Armenian sources to describe their Arab conquerors throughout Mesopotamia, Syria,
and Egypt. It was used early on in Christian Byzantine
literature to describe Haniph's or Arabs, and later Islamic sources
use it as a term that is synonymous with the
christ in terms sarracen. So anyway, I'm just giving the history.
I'm not disagreeing with you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no problem, Like, I mean, this is one thing,
it's like I'm okay to accept it either way.
Speaker 3: But I mean, I mean, isn't it also constantly called
in the literature of the ishmaelites. That's but in other words,
it's a term, but the term might be an accurate.
Is that what you're saying.
Speaker 2: That's That's basically what I'm saying. It's like it's a
term that's used, but that the accuracy of that term
is left to speculation. It's more of an assertion than
anything else. But like I mean, for me that it's
it's not really a question that really all.
Speaker 3: Right, snagobas five dollars, he says, God bless Ja. I
was received in the Orthodox Church. Thanks for all your
dismantling and my Protestant ideas, and for all the awesome
book recommendations. Thank you appreciate that. You can also get
my books, by the way in the shop at Jay's Analysis.
I have three books on Hollywood ser colluct with three
just came out. Get signed copies in the shop. I
also have my read book on theology, geopolitics, Critiquing Rome,
Critiquing Protestantism pork Stuff twenty dollars X Stream guys. Thank
you guys so much. Appreciate that. Remember you can support
the Stream through superchats through stream labs or natively through YouTube.
I will also be supporting Kai as well through your superchats.
A to A says for five dollars, thank you for
everything that you do. Thank you. Adrian Scairo says for
ten dollars. Maximum MiQ has to be sixty five of
these people. Well, I guess you can debate what the
maximum is, but it's not up there. I'll tell you
that it's yeah, go ahead, God.
Speaker 2: Good to go. All right. So just to continue this
slide here a few more points. So you no longer
have as many younger people to economically support an increasing
population with regards to the birth gap problem. But alongside
this is that Muslims will outpace non Muslim birth gaps.
So as the European population is set to decrease, the
ratio of Muslims to non Muslims is set to increase.
And so this is the perfect scenario for the New
World Order to flood Muslims into Europe and essentially Europeans
delay having their own children in order to financially support
Muslim migrants to an existing parasitical life on welfare. But
once Muslims have a dominant global presence, the same New
World Order will curb that Muslim dominance given the Islamic
prevalence for stupidity and generational inbreeding. So the ambitions of
the New World Order align with the Islamic aspiration for
global dominance for the time being. And this is precisely
why those of the New World Order want to flood
and overwhelm Europe and other places with Muslim migrants, knowing
that they will generally not be productive members of society.
And I'm going to get into my presentation later on.
You're going to see the numbers and what other countries
are doing instead. These migrants will be a burden to
their host countries.
Speaker 3: Time to be complaining, they but we're getting up into
almost three hours. How long How much longer do you
have anticipated for this one? I was going to keep
talking for No, I'm not trying to cut you off.
I'm just asking what your estimate is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe I would say another hour, Okay, let's go. Yeah,
So these migrants, they're gonna be a burden to their
host countries economic, societally, and culturally. But so to put
in another way, the New World Order is actively helping
Muslims who are in the minority transition from the Meccan
phase to the Medean phase. There's no interest for the
New World Order to help Muslims build or rebuild their
native countries. Rather, there is an active global exportation of
Islamic destruction by Muslims as a hive minded horde to
just devour and consume everything. Ask yourself the question, why
do Muslims from Muslim majority countries all want to go
to Europe. You can throw in North America or whatever,
but just for the purposes for the sake of a
shorter journey, Let's say they're all wanting to go to Europe.
The answer is quite simple, because Europe is better. But
some European countries are starting to push back. Many Europeans
have a sense of self preservation, and despite facing their
own internal problems of societal degeneration and eroding of traditional values,
there is a strong sense of national identity and culture
among many Europeans. Consider Denmark. For Examplemark Denmark places ads
in Middle Eastern newspapers warning migrants not to come. These
ads tell people that Denmark will not give them welfare
benefits the same as what Native Danes are entitled to receive.
That family reunification is restricted. For example, the banning of
spouses under twenty four years of age, requiring heavy deposits
and length lengthening wait times, and that Danish is the
language to be spoken in Denmark. Denmark has zero asylum policies,
so called refugees are viewed as temporary guests with no
path towards residency. Remigration will happen. All asylum claims will
be handled and processed in a different country. In other words,
don't show up in Denmark and expect to find asylum
claim there. There are very strict immigration laws. Only people
who can actually contribute positively to Danish society are selectively screened.
Should anyone be allowed entry into Denmark, then Denmark reserves
the right that their jewelry and cash be seized, and
that is going to go towards financially supporting their stay
in Denmark. Now, this next point here is very important. Denmark,
along with Sweden and Norway, has banned cousin marriages, so
family reunification of cousins is now impossible on the grounds
of marriage. This law especially contradicts Islam. In other words,
scanned the Navy is telling the entire Muslim world that
Islam is not the law of the land and never
will be. Everyone in Denmark must integrate into Danish society
or face consequences. Neighborhoods are physically demolished in order to
eliminate ghettos. Foreigners are then reassigned to new housing locations
in order to better foster integration efforts, and anyone refusing
to abide by the mandatory relocation assignment will lose government
financial assistance. Foreign parents will lose government financial assistance if
they do not speak Danish with their children at home,
and the children of foreigners are routinely assessed on their
Danish proficiency, and Denmark also has compulsory integration programs. In Norway,
the fr PET is on the rise. This is the
most right wing party in Norwegian politics, expected to become
the majority in the next election. The leader of the party,
Selvi Lestaug, recently made a post that reveals some very
disturbing statistics about immigrants in Norway. Immigrants receive a staggering
seventy four percent of all social assistants. Let me rephrase
that so that people don't misunderstand what I just said.
It is not the case that seventy four percent of
immigrants in Norway are on social assistance. Rather, of all
the people in Norway that receive social assistance, seventy four
percent are immigrants. Norway is not anti immigration. Rather, the
problem is with immigrants who burden the rest of society
because they do not integrate and do not work. And
part of the social assistance problem is due to chain immigration.
One migrant makes it into Norway and then brings his
entire family through chain immigration, who more likely than not
will live on welfare. In Scandinavia, there is something very
interesting called Jantiloven and this is a set of ten
principles that aim to preserve Scandinavian culture and a cohesive,
egalitarian society. However, Islam teaches that Muslims are superior to
non Muslims the Kufar. You, as a Muslim are not
to integrate, so Scandinavian values are fundamentally incompatible with Islam.
The ten principles of Yan Telovin are You are not
to think you are anything special. You are not to
think you are as good as we are. You are
not to think you are smarter than we are. You
are not to imagine yourself better than we are. You
are not to think you know more than we do.
You are not to think you are more important than
we are. You are not to think you are good
at anything. You are not to laugh at us. You
are not to think anyone cares about you. You are
not to think you can teach us anything. In other words,
Islam is not compatible with Scandinavian society, as it fundamentally
contradicts Scandinavian culture and a cohesive, egalitarian society. Consider Poland.
In twenty twenty four, Poland signs into law the authorized
use of lethal force against anyone crossing the border into
Poland illegally i e. Migrants flooding into Europe, and you
can go to I provided the link there the official
presidential website. President Duda stressed that undoubtedly the growing terror
wave is connected with migration. There is evidence so rather,
no one in Europe can have doubts. In other words,
if you, as a my grint, tried to cross the
border illegally into Poland, then you will be unalived. That
is legally what Poland has stipulated. Consider Hungary. The Hungarian
President Victor Urban has said the main task of his
new government will be to preserve Hungary's security and Christian culture.
The hardline right winger was reelected for a third successive
term as Prime Minister in April. I think the articles
written in twenty eighteen. So April twenty eighteen, after a
strong anti immigration message secured a landslide victory. We are
working on building an old school Christian democracy rooted in
European traditions. We believe in the importance of the nation
and in Hungary we do not want to yield ground
to any supranational business or political empire, he said. Orban
has accused non governmental organizations funded by the Hungarian born
billionaire George Soros of political meddling and actively supporting immigration.
So Soros would be an element within this new world
order who is very much supportive of flooding Europe with migrants,
but not just migrants, migrants specifically from Muslim majority countries.
He wants to flood Europe with Muslims. Furthermore, I can
only speak for the Hungarian people, and they don't want
any migration, Orban said. My understanding, it's not possible for
the people to have a will on a fundamental issue
and for the government not to comply with it. As such,
they shouldn't be considered refugees so much as Muslim invaders,
he said. In keeping refugees out of Hungary, Orban asserted
he is merely following the will of his people, an
indirect dig at Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose open door refugee
policy has come under fire in Germany, and the difference
between Germany and Hungary's respective handling of the refugee crisis
is that Germany wanted migrants and we, meaning Hungary, didn't.
All cultures are not equal. This is not just some
anti Islam rhetoric. While Europeans may believe that European culture
is superior to Islamic culture, Islam itself teaches that not
all cultures are equal. Islam teaches that Islamic culture is
superior to all other cultures, so the feeling is mutual. Furthermore,
migrants from other parts of the world, especially those from
Muslim majority countries, do not think or behave like you.
Muslims have no problem putting a knife to a baby's
head in order to draw blood as an act of
mourning for Hussein. These are the types of people you
get when you have of open door migration. Now, Sunnis
may say that this is what the Shia do. Non
Muslims don't care about the differences between Sunni and Shia.
That's an internal dispute. It's similar to how being an
Orthodox or Roman Catholic makes no difference to the subjugated
status in an Islamic state. According to Islam, a Christian
is a Christian. There's no Orthodox or Roman Catholic or whatever.
That's an internal dispute. Muslims, as a collective refuse to
integrate into other cultures. Compulsory integration programs may work on
some individuals, but it will not overturn Islamic culture. There's
a difference between teach someone civility versus wholescale importation of barbarism. Denmark, Hungary,
Poland are Denmark, Hungary, Poland precisely because they are not Syria, Somalia,
or Saudi Arabia. Muslims are proud of their native heritage
and culture. Syrians are proud to be Syrians. Somalis are
proud to be Somalis. Saudi Arabians are proud to be
Saudi Arabians. Those who are Danish be proud to be Danish.
Be proud to embrace and preserve your Danish identity and culture. Likewise, Polish,
be proud to be Polish, preserve your Polish identity and culture.
And Hungarians Likewise, If you, as a non Muslim European
do not embrace and preserve your national identity and culture,
then you will be replaced with Muslims and Islam. That
is the trajectory. Europe is at a crossroads and needs
to realize before it is too late that jihad is
being waged by the Muslims and the New World Order.
So I'm going to end the presentation there properly for
part one, but I'm just going to give a couple
more slides as a kind of preview of the kind
of discussions that we're now going to kind of venture
off into future streams as we now start looking at
the various geopolitical interactions with different nation states, with different groups,
with different agencies. So everyone has been immersed on going
Israel Hamas conflict, but we're going to frame the issue
a bit differently. Everyone knows the mantra Israel has a
right to defend itself. Okay, we hear that all the time.
Israel has a right to defend itself in the conflict
with Hamas, Israel is defending itself against Islamic jihad. After all,
Hamas's own official publications state things like Hamas being an
Islamic resistance movement, so it's not just a national movement,
it's an Islamic resistance movement, and that Jerusalem and its
Islamic in Christian holy places belong exclusively to the Palestinian
people and to the Arab and Islamic Umah. So while
Hamas is a national Palestinian movement, it is also an
Islamic movement Islamic. Hence, any hostility that Hamas engages in
is inherently to further the cause of Islam. In other words,
Hamas wages jihad. Now, Hamas will say that it wages
defensive jihad against Israeli aggression, but when Israel casts the
conflict as Israel defending itself, then de facto they are
saying that Hamas is waging offensive jihad. But what many
people may not know is that Israel was actually involved
in creating Hamas, and this is an important point often
left out, especially by mainstream media, when discussing the Israel
Kamas conflict.
Speaker 3: This as a side note, I mean I'm not trying
to cut you off. I mean, it is a topic
that we have covered probably thirty times on my channel
the last two years, multiple fourth multiple fourth hours, have
gone into great detail about this. I'm not disputing or
disagreeing with you. I'm just saying hopefully most people in
this audience will be familiar with this. And by the way,
this was also all the way up into recent times
Netnah who was still supporting this approach, giving them aide.
It was in multiple Israeli newspapers that this was still
going on in recent years. So this is not some
oh that's you know, decades ago. No, no, it's been
fairly recent. This is why there's been such a stir
amongst Israeli debate and politics over this topic. So this
is not a conspiracy theory. This is just basic history.
Even the Masad book by Victor Ostrowski discusses this, and
it's not just Hamas, it's also Muslim brotherhood. Ostrovski as
a whole section talking about that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, like we're going to unfold all of this
is I'm just kind of giving a preview of the
kind of analysis that we're going to provide. And so
The thing here is you might be wondering why in
the world would Israel want to create Hamas an overtly
Islamic movement bent on jihad. So it's not like Israel
didn't know that Hamas when they were creating it, that
it was were helping create it, that it was Islamic
in motivation, and that they wanted an Islamic state. They
were very much well aware of that. But the answer
fit's perfectly according to the New World Order playbook. So
the idea was for Israel to create a counterweight to
the PLO and Fatah in order to promote infighting between
the Palestinians. It was an attempt by Israel to divide
and conquer the Palestinians.
Speaker 3: Yes, exactly. And also, by the way, it's not I
know we're going to get into this. You're talking just
about Hamas, but this will also be the same rationale
when we get to the other Islamic groups in that region,
such as the Muslim brother.
Speaker 2: Yep, yeah, it's the same. It's the same playbook. The
playbook is just being used over and over. But I'm
going to get to a more crucial point in this
that sometimes gets a little bit overlooked is that when
Hamas becomes its own beast kind of becomes uncontained, Israel
contains it through forcible elimination. That is exactly the playbook unfolding.
With the globalization of Islam. You're going to flood Europe
with Muslim migrants, help and become dominant, and then control
and eliminate them as necessary. So this it's this general
idea of manipulating Muslims for nefarious New World Order ambitions
is why you'll see government collusions with, for example, the
Taliban in Afghanistan, Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood and
so on. But that's we're going to unpack all of
that in upcoming streams. And that's all I had for this,
So I am done.
Speaker 3: Awesome, Well, a really great present presentation introduction therek I
really appreciate that. A two A says for five dollars.
Thank you guys again for everything that you do. Let's
see we got some more super chats here. Foreign says
for five dollars. The Turkish cabin boy thing was conveyed
in a movie in the year two thousand. It's called
Dark Prince, The True Story of True Story of Dracula. Yeah,
I think we can reassess Dracula now and think that
he was probably more based and perhaps almost orthodox creudit
being five dollars. Thank you for the stream tonight, guys.
It was really good information. Thank you all right, guys,
appreciate it. Yeah, people are talking about Candace. You're not
going to get this level of information from Oprah bullshit
that you get from Candace. This is real history, real geopolitics.
That's why it's long form. That's why we have a
thousand people and watching it. And Candace has you know,
one hundred thousand people because she does soap opera bullshit.
We do real information. So shout out to all the
high iq bros in the chat, and thank you again
to Kai for this. And remember head over to chalk
dot com, which is the best and supplementation on the Internet.
The link is in the show chat chalk dot com,
c cho q dot com. Use a promo code j
sixty life that's Juy six zero l I fe to
get sixty percent off all those great products and you
can unsubscribe it anytime. Kay's channel is linked in the
shows script an Orthodox Shahada. He also has the Orthodox
Shahada substat which has a lot of excellent, excellent anti monophysie,
anti Islamic apologetics, and kai what do we want to
get into in the next lecture.
Speaker 2: So in the next lecture, we're gonna start looking at
some of the books that I listed up on the
first first slide. Here. One of the ones that I
think it's a short that's a short intraductory onto the topic.
It's The Dark Trajectory of Jihad by Brig Barker. So
he was an FBI agent working in the field on this,
and I think this is very important to talk about
the stuff that he talked about in his book before
we kind of get into a lot of the other stuff,
because he's looking specifically at the psychological makeup of people
who become jihades, who really get drawn into Islam to
fight that cause illicitly, and why people do it, how
you can tell the signs of somebody who is on
that path. I think that's a really important thing to
look at, and just to see this kind of psychological
manipulation that Muslims exert on other Muslims to influence their behaviors,
and also how Islam itself fosters this kind of exploitation.
So that's going to help us understand why a lot
of people do what they do and how these groups
that are interest empty.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and there was actually a couple of chapters in
the Paul Williams book as well that deals with the
methods and the means of recruitment that Bin Laden, al
Qaeda and other adjacent entities used, very similar to what
Kai is talking about. And remember that talk is in
my member section. It's also it was too hype for
the basically YouTube demonetized it and had to I had
to put it for the members because there was too
much going on in the history of al Qaido books,
So you can find that in the members section. Be
sure and subscribe to Kai everybody, and thank you so much.
Like share, Remember this is not going to be promoted
in the algo. I need you guys to push this
out there. We need shares, We need sending this out.
We need you guys to comment below, tell us the
books to read, what books you want to see us
cover in this domain, and a hit like and share.
Remember to turn on the notifications, guys. If you don't
turn on your notifications for live streams, it's not gonna
like we're not. We're just gonna stay here sort of stagnant.
So I need you guys to get active because we're
battling uphill against algorithmics type stuff.
Speaker 4: So thank you so much, Kai, no problem,