Speaker 1: Helloo, it is flag Day six o five pm. I
Speaker 1: found this a little gem. Let's watch this first.
Speaker 2: This week on Dark Corners. Lots of screaming tinder file
Speaker 2: and a harsh judgment on the director.
Speaker 1: I do as they say, no matter how it's tom We're.
Speaker 2: Looking at sword and sorcery. Flick Hundra, I shuddered with excitement,
Speaker 2: a feminist fable that opens in an all female village.
Speaker 3: Female freedom. We found we had all that name could
Speaker 3: give us except one thing, seat to plant life inside
Speaker 3: this that we might be Yeah.
Speaker 2: Children probably could have seen that coming. So the women
Speaker 2: occasionally hook up with strangers to keep the tribe going.
Speaker 4: Male change.
Speaker 3: We gave away all name of Spring.
Speaker 2: I hate to man explain your whole way of life,
Speaker 2: but I think I can put my finger on where
Speaker 2: you're going wrong. Just teach the boys respect. That'll solve
Speaker 2: the problem. No need to thank me, sweetheart.
Speaker 5: And that doesn't help at all.
Speaker 2: But not all the women want to be mothers.
Speaker 4: I prefer the feel of a heart between my legs
Speaker 4: and outwind.
Speaker 2: Hunger is a warrior instead of hunting.
Speaker 3: You should think like Adeena of bringing life to the village.
Speaker 2: Nothing like the leader of your female utopia, telling you
Speaker 2: to start having babies like your system.
Speaker 4: Adena brings enough life into the village for five.
Speaker 2: And now we're slut shaming a dinya. But this idyll
Speaker 2: can't last forever as men attack in slow motion one
Speaker 2: of the films so long. Unfortunately, Hundra is away, and
Speaker 2: when she returns.
Speaker 3: This head into if it will, all she could see
Speaker 3: was the station.
Speaker 2: Thank goodness, there's an incredibly slow voiceover to tell us
Speaker 2: exactly what we're seeing. With the help of her dog Beast,
Speaker 2: Hundra takes revenge. Yeah, really is a lot of screaming.
Speaker 6: Ah.
Speaker 2: She then seeks out an elder with a very familiar voice.
Speaker 3: And you are all better a lift of ouldry.
Speaker 2: I've come to complain about the voiceover. It's terrible. That's
Speaker 2: no better. Undra is not a badly made film, even
Speaker 2: watching the extended DVD version, which is definitely worse. That
Speaker 2: opening fight scene, if you take out the slow motion,
Speaker 2: is spectacular. But there is an issue. Fantasy heroes are
Speaker 2: out for revenge, rescue, or to seek the mystical Who's it?
Speaker 7: Of?
Speaker 2: What's it? Here?
Speaker 3: Without a man to plant inside us, we have nothing
Speaker 3: to cultivate.
Speaker 2: Thus began Hu's epic quest to get laid. This sells
Speaker 2: itself as a feminist fantasy, and that's the plot.
Speaker 4: No man will ever penetrate my body, or sword or himself.
Speaker 2: She says that now, But pretty soon.
Speaker 4: How will I know? If I am wise in my
Speaker 4: choice of men?
Speaker 3: The most hungry to demonstrate their virility will be found.
Speaker 2: To the south, all hard up in the south.
Speaker 3: Soon it will be my time to go.
Speaker 2: Does that mean the voiceover will stop? Hundre goes for
Speaker 2: a soul searching bareback ride through the surf, and I
Speaker 2: do mean bareback clothes stop me from thinking? She sets
Speaker 2: out to find a worthy man, definitely a contender. Unfortunately,
Speaker 2: the foreplay gets way out of hand once of him
Speaker 2: fathering a tribe now seriously short. But where will Hundra
Speaker 2: find someone better?
Speaker 7: Then?
Speaker 8: Go count on me and I'll bring my blood hands along.
Speaker 2: Pausing only to be rate other women, See what you
Speaker 2: raver do? Hundred tries the big city. As she arrives,
Speaker 2: goes to help briefly, Oh, well, can't save them?
Speaker 4: Are?
Speaker 2: Can I get something to eat? That her behavior has
Speaker 2: been noticed.
Speaker 5: We were interfered with by a woman.
Speaker 2: I felt violated.
Speaker 8: What of female foward medal and men's.
Speaker 2: Affairs not loving the men of the city.
Speaker 8: Women may be inherently ignorant, but that is stupid.
Speaker 2: In most instances, the city is run by a temple,
Speaker 2: which is funded by cleaning up local virgins and selling
Speaker 2: them to tribal chiefs. Some women have a reason to
Speaker 2: be used, not seeing that on a placard anytime soon
Speaker 2: soldiers come for her, my table, my store, I gave
Speaker 2: you lunch. There are regular action sequences in Hundra, and
Speaker 2: they're well shot but terribly structured. They don't go anywhere,
Speaker 2: and they exist only because it's been a while since
Speaker 2: the last one. Dra rethinks her entire world view and
Speaker 2: pay the healing A tall doctor. You say you were
Speaker 2: made with me and make a child a bit forward.
Speaker 4: You are my choice from meeting Pottery makes a valid point.
Speaker 5: A man cannot be forced to make love.
Speaker 4: Men force women.
Speaker 2: So does Hundra, but there.
Speaker 5: Is natural difference between us.
Speaker 2: It's cool when we do it.
Speaker 4: If I look as that woman did before, could you seek?
Speaker 5: Is more appealing to love.
Speaker 2: Him than still basically he fancier. If she looked like
Speaker 2: one of those hot temple girls.
Speaker 4: Then I will go there and become like her.
Speaker 2: Feel like we might be losing the message. Hudra is
Speaker 2: taken to the temple man I love religion, high priests
Speaker 2: in the parking greets the chiefs there to pick their
Speaker 2: latest girls.
Speaker 8: Welcome, mighty chieftains. We are again together for the nights
Speaker 8: of the pure, but.
Speaker 2: First the night of the impure. But Hundra doesn't meet
Speaker 2: with their approval. She is not docile, and a bet
Speaker 2: is made a thousand answer to see her on her
Speaker 2: knees and remains defiant.
Speaker 4: You will never go or submit.
Speaker 2: But I wouldn't say no to a makeover.
Speaker 4: I thought I would be cleansed.
Speaker 2: Not do it further, You're in the wrong movie. Oh
Speaker 2: the hilarity.
Speaker 4: Not appreciate what women go through for.
Speaker 2: Them, but still making its point. Undra makes friends with
Speaker 2: temple virgin Trachima, who is trying to hide the childs
Speaker 2: that might lead some to question her credentials.
Speaker 4: Try it again.
Speaker 2: Hundra teaches her to fight. She teaches Hundra to be
Speaker 2: a woman.
Speaker 4: Am I woman enough? Prepartery?
Speaker 9: Now?
Speaker 2: I don't feel like we make enough of the fact
Speaker 2: that his name's pottery. Remember, girls, if you want to
Speaker 2: land a man, change everything about yourself.
Speaker 4: I may not be with child, I feel I must
Speaker 4: return to him again and again and.
Speaker 2: Again, and pretty soon I have a child inside me.
Speaker 2: But how will she keep this from the parking?
Speaker 3: Try heter condition, the.
Speaker 2: Voiceover suddenly returning to give this entirely plausible explanation. How
Speaker 2: long term is this bet that the parking made with
Speaker 2: the chiefs? Now Hundra can leave?
Speaker 5: I cannot.
Speaker 2: You weren't invited. Me and my baby girl are going
Speaker 2: to rebuild the tribe on our own somehow. But Hundra
Speaker 2: has bigger issues. Where is my child?
Speaker 4: That dude?
Speaker 1: Is it all this guy right here? I don't know
Speaker 1: if you've ever seen his shar the Ruld part one,
Speaker 1: there's a in the Roman scene. There's a little little
Speaker 1: gay dude in the temple there too.
Speaker 2: She is forced to submit to the chiefs and we're
Speaker 2: into the final fight. I returned to slow motion just
Speaker 2: in case there was an.
Speaker 1: A bit funny if she took the blade written through.
Speaker 2: The danger of it getting exciting. The girls of the
Speaker 2: Temple take their revenge on the Parking after winning the
Speaker 2: Dark Corners Futurama Award.
Speaker 10: For I never thought I would die like this, but
Speaker 10: I'd always really.
Speaker 2: Hoped Hundra and Pottery go their separate ways.
Speaker 4: Can I We both sharees cars.
Speaker 2: That's what I've named our daughter. Okay, the worst thing
Speaker 2: a reviewer can do is try to remake the film,
Speaker 2: so you can add that to my many deficiencies as
Speaker 2: a reviewer. Throughout the film, a Hundre meets many subjugated women.
Speaker 2: Some she frees, some she doesn't. Most she admonishes fight back.
Speaker 2: But with those women she could have built an actual
Speaker 2: tribe rather than just her and her daughter, which is
Speaker 2: not a tribe. She could have learned that blood is
Speaker 2: less important than that shared bond.
Speaker 4: Let us make ourselves beautiful.
Speaker 2: Although if you are going to consciously make a feminist fantasy,
Speaker 2: then what might have helped would be having a woman
Speaker 2: write it.
Speaker 4: I have no purpose with you, little men.
Speaker 2: Thanks for watching. Please punch the like button in the jewel.
Speaker 1: What's the name of this again? I thought you now?
Speaker 1: Darker corners reviews a right, So that's on YouTube if
Speaker 1: you're interested in looking from here. That's the first one
Speaker 1: I found that was that was funny. I'm sure they're
Speaker 1: all I had just have mad a chance to go
Speaker 1: through all of them. It was on a very long
Speaker 1: walk today, very long and oh my god, took a
Speaker 1: lot out of me just being in the hot so
Speaker 1: and it's super hot today. The wind wasn't nearly as strong,
Speaker 1: less of a relief from the heat, getting a little
Speaker 1: breeze on you. And my daughter had her gymnastics thing today.
Speaker 1: So I don't know where did I say this? Oh yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know here. I'll just read it from the telegram.
Speaker 1: I think I have a pair we we we we
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, so I said, uh, there were protesters in
Speaker 1: front of the dunkin Donuts when I went there today.
Speaker 1: I didn't see when I walked in. When I came
Speaker 1: in because I came and drove in from a different
Speaker 1: side of the parking lot. But when I was leaving,
Speaker 1: I was getting to the corner of like a busy intersection,
Speaker 1: I saw a huge group, not a huge, but considered
Speaker 1: amount of people. Twenty thirty people just standing there with signs,
Speaker 1: and there was one they self what do you call it?
Speaker 1: They self censor their own signs, like I said, f
Speaker 1: underline like underscore c K right ice as an immigration
Speaker 1: and the I'm thinking to myself, well, that's that's short
Speaker 1: sighted and kind of silly and then low and also
Speaker 1: a little comprehension, and then they had one that said
Speaker 1: Trump is a racist and the A was missing in
Speaker 1: that with another underscore like really really, like are they
Speaker 1: trying to be polite to children? Like or are they
Speaker 1: just that weird that they everybody types in uh, you know,
Speaker 1: past the sensor social media now even when they write
Speaker 1: signs in real life. I don't know, because people are
Speaker 1: so damn NPC they just see things and copy it
Speaker 1: without thinking as to the why they do things like
Speaker 1: that and what was it? So obviously if you're here
Speaker 1: and you are they were like older people, like elderly
Speaker 1: some of them. Other ones were you know, maybe of
Speaker 1: the Mexican persuasion or whatever. But if they're here legally themselves,
Speaker 1: shouldn't they want everybody to go through the same process
Speaker 1: that they did. Shouldn't they not want them to cheat
Speaker 1: the system? I mean, if they're actually paying taxes here, now,
Speaker 1: do they really want somebody to come here to be
Speaker 1: a welfare recipient or a criminal? I mean, technically you're
Speaker 1: a criminal if you didn't go through the process correctly.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's work visas, there's all things, lots of
Speaker 1: reasons and ways for you to be here, and you
Speaker 1: go through the whole citizenship process too, And if you
Speaker 1: don't do any of that, then you're not respecting where
Speaker 1: you're going, but you're you feel entitled to something, meaning
Speaker 1: other people's labor to pay for your life. How could
Speaker 1: anybody who is in the system here be okay with that?
Speaker 1: So are they just that ignorant to how things work
Speaker 1: in the world that they want more burden upon themselves
Speaker 1: than everyone else? And what's that to say? If a
Speaker 1: screening process, I mean, immigration does have a purpose and
Speaker 1: when it's done correctly right, A border a a border,
Speaker 1: A divider is what makes you, you know, is a definer.
Speaker 1: If you don't have a divider, you don't have a
Speaker 1: definition as to being your own entity without without dividing lines,
Speaker 1: there is no defining lines. So if you if you
Speaker 1: don't allow I mean, if you don't allow some sort
Speaker 1: of screen process or if you don't want that, if
Speaker 1: you're screaming for it, it's a little ridiculous. And the
Speaker 1: calls of I mean, he's a he's an anti American Zionist,
Speaker 1: psychopathic but racist, I don't think that's the proper framework.
Speaker 1: You can say a lot of other horrible things about
Speaker 1: Trump and be completely on on the level, but the
Speaker 1: racist part just simply because of immigration thing, and just
Speaker 1: the funniest part about it all is it's a it's
Speaker 1: all for show anyway, that whole thing. It's not it's
Speaker 1: not really doing anything except for optics for public perception
Speaker 1: that he's quote unquote doing something. It's not really doing
Speaker 1: much of it at all, So it's all it's all
Speaker 1: silly to then have a counter to that, So you're
Speaker 1: people get lost in that distraction while other more horrific
Speaker 1: things are going on. They didn't say anything about Palenteer
Speaker 1: on those signs, They didn't say anything about surveillance state
Speaker 1: on those signs. They didn't say anything about you know,
Speaker 1: none of that stuff, none, none of the true issues.
Speaker 1: And this is what happened the first round, right, you know,
Speaker 1: when all the all the cultish Hillary fans who didn't
Speaker 1: seem to have a problem with her potentially ripping a
Speaker 1: face off a child and wearing it, or any other
Speaker 1: murders of the Clintons, you know, faustus Australian for Clinton
Speaker 1: body count, they did. They didn't, They didn't have any
Speaker 1: problem with any of the of the of the those
Speaker 1: aspects of Trump that made him anti American. They didn't
Speaker 1: have any trouble with his anti constitutional, anti Second Amendment,
Speaker 1: countering the Bill of Rights in the first or the
Speaker 1: second Amendment. Nobody ever complained about that on mainstream media
Speaker 1: because that worked along with the system that they would
Speaker 1: have other stupid gripes. So there are legitimate arguments, legitimate
Speaker 1: reasons for resistance and complaint, but they don't never address those.
Speaker 1: They play in the fantasy. And it's completely counterproductive to
Speaker 1: do so because it takes people completely away from any
Speaker 1: of the And this is on purpose, obviously, for many
Speaker 1: of the real stuff that's happening that actually matters. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's a ziobank rep that to be an issue. He's
Speaker 1: not America first, because there is no America, hasn't been
Speaker 1: since eighteen sixty five. And when you're up that high,
Speaker 1: you're selected for a position. And I used to, you know,
Speaker 1: be in that same group of people who would say,
Speaker 1: you know, California, California's are idiots. They get what they
Speaker 1: deserve because they vote these people. Don't be voting these people. Then,
Speaker 1: I mean, there might be a lot of people that
Speaker 1: believe in this actual nonsense, because it's the cult of
Speaker 1: you know, social cult of society, cult of pop culture,
Speaker 1: cult of the media, really that that drives these these
Speaker 1: ideas of forward in the first place. But then you
Speaker 1: also have that bigger element to the to the formula,
Speaker 1: that is, they're selected or it's like the Aldridge Plan
Speaker 1: versus the Federal Reserve. Aldris was one of the biggest
Speaker 1: pushers for the Federal Reserve Act. His Aldridge Plan wasn't different.
Speaker 1: It just had a different name. It was almost the
Speaker 1: same verbiage. And when it had done the same thing,
Speaker 1: put a foreign entity in here, same people running it,
Speaker 1: and it's so you had two fists with the same
Speaker 1: freaking thing in it, and it's like, hey, pick one,
Speaker 1: pick one fist, and I'll open it up. You know,
Speaker 1: they have the same damn thing though, So you don't
Speaker 1: get choice, You get the illusion of choice, and it's
Speaker 1: all gonna go back to the same route, just with
Speaker 1: a different rhetoric. You're picking your rhetoric. You're picking who
Speaker 1: how do I want to be lied to? If I
Speaker 1: want to be coddled with by lies, So that it
Speaker 1: sounds like the idealism or the virtues that I believe
Speaker 1: in or do. I want them to be the opposition's
Speaker 1: virtues so that I oppose them more every step of
Speaker 1: the way. It doesn't matter. They're both going to the
Speaker 1: same place because they're both serving the same master, the
Speaker 1: ancient cult of child killer, you know, child sacrifice. It's
Speaker 1: disguised under cabalistic mysticism. And I want to show you
Speaker 1: this video too if I get it, If I can
Speaker 1: get it up here, it's gonna make sure. Is it
Speaker 1: right up there? Let me see, I added, isn't though, Oh,
Speaker 1: I think this is right. Let me see. Let me
Speaker 1: try open this up and see if I need to say.
Speaker 1: I just want you to hear the tough talk. And
Speaker 1: I know there's gonna be a lot of Hurrahs and
Speaker 1: horays for this, but you're missing. I think some people
Speaker 1: are missing the gravity of the situation of this type
Speaker 1: of talk, because honestly, the people should be the ones
Speaker 1: doing the policing, not some governmental body that is informed
Speaker 1: by the A, d L, the FBI, and the CIA,
Speaker 1: which all hate you and want American values to be destroyed.
Speaker 1: You don't want them tough talking, and they do it.
Speaker 1: They play upon these like these faults. What they call
Speaker 1: it not even such so much. I don't think strong
Speaker 1: man is the right word. But they create a facade,
Speaker 1: which is you know, it's pretty obvious is the flaws
Speaker 1: in this facade, but it's still a facade. And then
Speaker 1: they say, well, this stereotype that we've manufactured, that's and
Speaker 1: they give off the impression that this is why we're
Speaker 1: going to beef up our you know, aggressiveness as police officers,
Speaker 1: because this element needs to be taught a lesson. But
Speaker 1: that's not what it's for. Because you give them license
Speaker 1: to do that to any group, you're giving them license
Speaker 1: to do it to every citizen. And that's the slope.
Speaker 1: So let me just zippy do down my arse over
Speaker 1: here and hopefully we'll hear this. Where's the Playboy matters.
Speaker 11: It's great to be here on the space coast. I'm
Speaker 11: joined by Boy.
Speaker 1: Already. He's pulling out space I know, you know it's Florida,
Speaker 1: so you know he's a Brevard County. Now, Broward County
Speaker 1: is one of the most corrupt, probably in the nation.
Speaker 1: Brevard isn't too far away.
Speaker 8: Hey.
Speaker 11: A bunch of leaders that further exemplify why we are
Speaker 11: not and will never be.
Speaker 1: Is that where Cape Canaveral is. Is that what you're
Speaker 1: talking about? The space coast maybe California.
Speaker 10: Florida Attorney General James Upmeyer, alongside Brevard County Sheriff Wayne
Speaker 10: Ivy and other political leaders and.
Speaker 1: Some man in a blond wig is.
Speaker 10: Kidding and law enforcement officials gathered to give a warning
Speaker 10: to any groups thinking about protesting ice raids here in
Speaker 10: central Florida.
Speaker 12: If you throw a brick, a fire bomb, or point
Speaker 12: a gun at one of our deputies, we will be
Speaker 12: notifying your family where to collect your remains at.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, hold on a second. Okay, I can understand
Speaker 1: the plane and the gun thing string a brick, So
Speaker 1: if you ding this is this is the same. This
Speaker 1: is the same mentality as if you throw a rocket
Speaker 1: a tank, we can level your city and kill all
Speaker 1: the children. His start is missing a couple of points
Speaker 1: there to be a ren fan star, but he's still
Speaker 1: doing the same ship.
Speaker 8: Because we will kill you, graveyard dead. We're not gonna play.
Speaker 10: This all comes as hundreds in Los Angeles continue protesting
Speaker 10: President Trump's.
Speaker 1: In force, so they're gonna they're they're tough talking in Florida,
Speaker 1: which is slightly bit of a drive from La County,
Speaker 1: and they're doing this in response to LA County as
Speaker 1: a warning to their people. So they're threatening. This is
Speaker 1: what we call police state. This is what you call
Speaker 1: fear of the government. This is not where we're supposed
Speaker 1: to be. And any position like that being taken should
Speaker 1: be taken by the citizens who say we're not going
Speaker 1: to tolerate it, not a police force. The sheriff is
Speaker 1: supposed to be the one the closest on your side,
Speaker 1: but those those are also informed by the Anti Defecation League.
Speaker 10: Enforcement of immigration laws, and ice raids throughout the country.
Speaker 2: Things.
Speaker 1: Having learns, just supposed assume that it's all on the
Speaker 1: up and up, and that all these are integral raids
Speaker 1: and that they're not just taking other people out too
Speaker 1: in the because you can't question it, you can't challenge it,
Speaker 1: you can't criticize it, because he'll shoot you dead, graveyard dead.
Speaker 10: It's a fid as Trump called in the National Guard.
Speaker 1: So what if he does sweep up other people? What
Speaker 1: if they do do that. You know a few legitimate
Speaker 1: people here that shouldn't be here. And I wholly agreed
Speaker 1: that if you're not going through their correct process, you're
Speaker 1: not embracing the ideals of this place anyway, and you're
Speaker 1: just here to exploit it, and you deserve to be
Speaker 1: on the other side of the boundary. But who's to
Speaker 1: say that they're doing just doing that? Is that the
Speaker 1: assumption we're all making after everything that we've seen.
Speaker 10: And now other cities across the country are joining in groups.
Speaker 11: Talk about assembling over the weekend. We haven't seen much
Speaker 11: of that in Florida. But if you do, these guys
Speaker 11: the Sheriff's Office, Colonel.
Speaker 2: Howse and will kill you. Team.
Speaker 11: We are ready across the state.
Speaker 10: So far, there have not been any reported protests or
Speaker 10: riots here.
Speaker 1: You like the liatodium, this is the anti riot state.
Speaker 10: From Brevard County. But the Attorney General says, with calls
Speaker 10: for a national protest day on June fourteenth, his office
Speaker 10: decided to announce that Florida will have a dedicated ICE
Speaker 10: agent embed in the state. Anthony Koker.
Speaker 11: Recently, I was sent down here on behalf of ICE
Speaker 11: headquarters to represent local and state law enforcement.
Speaker 1: Nice no I always referring to the double windsor tie
Speaker 1: somebody tied a good tie f raime by his wife
Speaker 1: or the state of Florida, the other Big Boyfriend.
Speaker 10: The announcement from the Thursday press conference here at the
Speaker 10: Sheriff's office is that there's a new program to protect
Speaker 10: ICE agents.
Speaker 11: Around the country, especially in California. You're seeing a new
Speaker 11: effort where leftist groups are attacking ICE agents by revealing
Speaker 11: their personal identify.
Speaker 1: This guy's itchine to shoot someone right now. See them
Speaker 1: hopping up and down. I'm surprised he's even holding his
Speaker 1: clipboard in that hand because that's a shoot in hand.
Speaker 11: And identifying information, including family information. This is called dosing.
Speaker 1: That's the fat person shuffle because they know that they're overweight,
Speaker 1: and that's what they consider exercise bouncing up and down
Speaker 1: and moving quickly and looking like they're you know, messed
Speaker 1: up or something that because they want to actually do exercise,
Speaker 1: but they'll they'll constantly do busy work to make themselves
Speaker 1: appear or you know, fool themselves that they're somehow getting
Speaker 1: more exercise.
Speaker 10: By doing that kind of information as an intimidation tactic
Speaker 10: or to threaten someone is already illegal here in Florida
Speaker 10: covering barbar County in Titusville, Megamury already WESH two.
Speaker 1: News Awesome sad comments already, right, No rober bullets in
Speaker 1: Florida really ones where my at It's working in the
Speaker 1: right way today when I clicked that button. Hey, all right,
Speaker 1: Happy false flag day, Daniel.
Speaker 8: Right.
Speaker 1: I was trying to get here at thirty three minutes,
Speaker 1: but I failed the thirty three club initiation and go MRCA. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Oh my god. I'm a little beat up. My shoulder
Speaker 1: always sucks. But I also had a after I got back.
Speaker 1: I got here a little late from the walk. I
Speaker 1: didn't know it was gonna be that long, and I
Speaker 1: had to negotiate with Rascal for the chair, so that
Speaker 1: took a little bit too. I didn't want to be
Speaker 1: rude to him. He's a good cat. Little guys getting
Speaker 1: great hairs now maybe needs more copper?
Speaker 5: Is that? So?
Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw the the thumbnail where
Speaker 1: my hat that's not the right one canceled. But Brosiphilopagus,
Speaker 1: what are you doing over there? Buddy? Who's that?
Speaker 2: Uh?
Speaker 1: Prosyphilopicus has some stories all right, and we have a
Speaker 1: new series of stuff that's gonna come on. So I
Speaker 1: already have on Rumble and on YouTube without any content
Speaker 1: on it. I'll type it and they'll put it on
Speaker 1: the screen so you can you can read it and
Speaker 1: maybe find it. I hardly, I hardly doubt that there's
Speaker 1: another channel by this name, and if there is, I've
Speaker 1: I quit because how the hell else he's supposed to
Speaker 1: come up with something that's not already taken. All right? Uh?
Speaker 1: You see that? So that's on rumble, and that's on
Speaker 1: YouTube if you want to follow that. There's also an
Speaker 1: instagram by the same name that does have a little
Speaker 1: bit of content on it. But I'm gonna put the
Speaker 1: walk and talks that I've been doing on there, and
Speaker 1: then eventually when I figured figure out how to do
Speaker 1: voice activation, where if I have animation and I can
Speaker 1: somehow use it with the obs and maybe do pre
Speaker 1: record it first and then do live just so that
Speaker 1: way I can do edits and stuff like that instead
Speaker 1: of me talking talking like thet all the time. Is
Speaker 1: gonna be kind of hard though, so I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'll have to figure out how to do it on
Speaker 1: the board to get that nasally sound. They're gonna be
Speaker 1: funny shorter sketches, but and also product review and stuff
Speaker 1: like that. But I'm also gonna do my own personal
Speaker 1: walk and talks that are gonna look a lot like
Speaker 1: when you see Max Began or Jeff Burrowy walking on
Speaker 1: the tree. So since I'm doing these walks, I've been
Speaker 1: taking the go pro and I haven't touched any of
Speaker 1: them off the go pro yet. Just did more today.
Speaker 1: But walking gives you ideas, right, It's just one of
Speaker 1: those things. Maybe that's why Hayes Hoos did it all
Speaker 1: the time. Right, Yeah, come welco with me. You know
Speaker 1: it's inspiring, So that alone could be it's own like
Speaker 1: faith right faith practice anyway, you know, just going on
Speaker 1: a nice walk in the sun and field the field nature,
Speaker 1: it's good times, especially when it's nice and sunny out.
Speaker 1: What is a rascal as stress because you won't let
Speaker 1: him on the keyboard? He does he wants to late
Speaker 1: right on top of it. That's hopcats roll. They want
Speaker 1: to be right where you are, right where the action is.
Speaker 1: So if your fingers are moving somewhere, they want to
Speaker 1: get under there so you can pet them. But yeah,
Speaker 1: that's prociphil up against. So if you if you get
Speaker 1: on there now, then when I started putting the walking
Speaker 1: talks on there, that'll be fun. And then it's gonna
Speaker 1: be more. I'm still gonna hit the same information, but
Speaker 1: not as over the head, and maybe more in a
Speaker 1: sarcastic way where it's more like parody satire type of stuff,
Speaker 1: and gonna be incorporating as much as I can, as
Speaker 1: much AI animation as I can as I can acquire
Speaker 1: for free at first, because I'm not getting paid, so
Speaker 1: I'm not putting money money out to do integrated things
Speaker 1: with the procipha up against character until I get a
Speaker 1: a ceasing assist from Sesame Street for using the head
Speaker 1: of Smiths up. I guess, yeah, I didn't think that
Speaker 1: went through. And I was actually kind of putting it
Speaker 1: in that fit because I have a bunch of settlements
Speaker 1: that I was gonna put together for more products from
Speaker 1: my site, and I was gonna make a like a
Speaker 1: pre workout in a post without any stimulants. And it's
Speaker 1: that way you can take your energy drink and not
Speaker 1: get all super jittery because you took your free work
Speaker 1: out and an energy drink. But if I use him,
Speaker 1: then there's you know, eventually people are gonna be like,
Speaker 1: you can't do that, and like, but it's so funny.
Speaker 1: Maybe if I put ears on him because snuffle up,
Speaker 1: I guess its supposed to be a freaking elephant. Why
Speaker 1: doesn't he have ears? Ears are kind of like the
Speaker 1: whole thing where it comes to an elephant. It's kind
Speaker 1: of an oversight there, mister, mister Henson. Maybe maybe you
Speaker 1: know something about evolution that we've all missed, because that's
Speaker 1: not a real thing. Okay, let's move on. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: show you something. Oh and also I'm gonna do some
Speaker 1: how to stuff on that channel too, like going through
Speaker 1: my process of how I figured out how to use
Speaker 1: my very little uh prowess in technical technological stuff to
Speaker 1: get some pretty interesting results already, and also some commentary
Speaker 1: on what it's like owning a business and all that stuff,
Speaker 1: and the ship that I go through. And you know,
Speaker 1: you're only you're only as you're only as good as
Speaker 1: your weakest link, I guess right, And that weakest link
Speaker 1: is anytime you're you're dependent on the third party to
Speaker 1: supply you with something. So during the lockdown, well, first
Speaker 1: of all, not even before even before that, when I
Speaker 1: was ordering from General Bottle Supply and I still do
Speaker 1: in in LA the bottles that I get they've run out,
Speaker 1: I'm like that's you're a bottle company, you should know
Speaker 1: when you run out of it and when you're gonna
Speaker 1: run low, and you should know like when to place
Speaker 1: and order. And this is before there was any like
Speaker 1: slow downs and like you know, shipping and stuff like
Speaker 1: that from overseas. And I have to I also tell
Speaker 1: you this, there's very little glass still meat and made
Speaker 1: any glass products in America, thank you NAFTA and GAT
Speaker 1: and all this other crap and everybody moving over there.
Speaker 1: And it's cheaper labor, so cheaper product YadA, yeah, yeah da.
Speaker 1: So when you get tough here, it prices you out.
Speaker 1: If you're trying to resell a product with something in it,
Speaker 1: you know, you're looking at anywhere between twenty and forty
Speaker 1: cents per unit bottle versus like a hot dollar fifty,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. So like that cost adds
Speaker 1: up because then you have a label, and you have
Speaker 1: the content, and you have the cap and the shrink band,
Speaker 1: and it just bless and less that you get. And
Speaker 1: then you have to think about, Okay, so while when
Speaker 1: I sell this, is there labor cost is their rent?
Speaker 5: You know?
Speaker 1: Is there a payment process or fee if they use
Speaker 1: a card? What am I getting for this, and how
Speaker 1: is it worth it? So anytime something goes up in price,
Speaker 1: it might not be a lot if you just focus
Speaker 1: on that one thing, but when you look at the overall,
Speaker 1: then you're like, WHOA, holy crap. Uh yeah, I'm not
Speaker 1: have to sell one hundred of these things just to
Speaker 1: justify the labor costs to have a person stand there
Speaker 1: for me to do it. And I know it's like
Speaker 1: and if I'm standing there too, then that defeats the
Speaker 1: purpose of having somebody there. Because my store only required
Speaker 1: one person to operates. I shouldn't have to be there.
Speaker 1: I got a family, and I got to make the
Speaker 1: stuff and transport it back. So there's gonna be more
Speaker 1: more stuff like that too. If anybody's interested, if anybody's
Speaker 1: into small businesses themselves, let me, you know, talk to me,
Speaker 1: h my email address, because we can have conversations together
Speaker 1: on this stuff too. And I'd like to bring people
Speaker 1: on and discuss this, like what the one thing I
Speaker 1: thinks missed is what real people go through. And you
Speaker 1: know how relatable it could be to somebody or everybody
Speaker 1: who's trying to be independent from being employed as by
Speaker 1: other people. Right, So you can use that one on
Speaker 1: the screen if you're on the podcast, it's Ballbuster B
Speaker 1: A A L B U S T E R S
Speaker 1: at outlook dot com. And maybe we'll talk about it
Speaker 1: on a show sometime. And those are the things that
Speaker 1: I'll throw on to the Patreon in addition, and I'll
Speaker 1: put it on dro Syphilopicus channel, and that'll kind of
Speaker 1: like separate the two genres. I if I had thought
Speaker 1: about this a long time ago, I probably would have
Speaker 1: started doing all the medical stuff on one separate channel
Speaker 1: because you don't get to have different playlists on Rumble.
Speaker 1: You get to only create different channels under the same
Speaker 1: like account. So I can't make a playlist and have
Speaker 1: it just say doctor gl It in doctor Manzo and
Speaker 1: before that, like doctor Artists and stuff like that. I
Speaker 1: can't do that. You can do that everywhere else but Rumble.
Speaker 1: So other people might be not right quite ready for
Speaker 1: the stuff I talk about, So I think that, But
Speaker 1: then again, having the higher subscriber count was why they
Speaker 1: got there in the first place, because I know that's
Speaker 1: the trigger, right if even if you like content someplace,
Speaker 1: for some times, some reason, some people just don't gravitate
Speaker 1: to channels that don't have a high followership. It's a
Speaker 1: catch twenty two. Well, now that you're there, click the
Speaker 1: damn follow and that's one more person, right, But it's
Speaker 1: strange once you hit the ten k mark, it's like
Speaker 1: a psychological thing. And plus other people pick up on
Speaker 1: it too, like the algorithms and stuff like that. And
Speaker 1: obviously if your content is approved for the masses, if
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, then of course they're going
Speaker 1: to promote that stuf once you've shown that you can
Speaker 1: actually draw an audience yourself, and they don't foresee that
Speaker 1: as a thing until after you're getting hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of views and at least ten to fifteen thousand people
Speaker 1: following you on one particular thing, like not all of
Speaker 1: the other were probably at twenty, but just on rumble,
Speaker 1: it's like close to close to forty eight hundred. And
Speaker 1: is anybody I had the phone set up too, if
Speaker 1: anybody wants to call in, let's see is the new
Speaker 1: number on here? Is just the old one? I wish
Speaker 1: I knew that was on there. I forgot the number.
Speaker 1: The old one was three, five, four, eight, eight seventy nine. Man,
Speaker 1: I haven't heard that a long time, but this one is.
Speaker 1: Has anybody heard anything like I don't think I think
Speaker 1: it was a I think it was a it was
Speaker 1: a no go on the full fledged riot that they anticipated. Today.
Speaker 1: That's what we were talking about. False flag. False Flag Day,
Speaker 1: which is also today is my dad's birthday. I know
Speaker 1: my dad is not Donald Trump. My daughter is a
Speaker 1: tall German Irish Man, mostly German, a little bit Italian,
Speaker 1: and then my bonnceible blooded Italian, hence my height.
Speaker 5: All right.
Speaker 1: I had I had one of my daughter's friends yesterday
Speaker 1: when we went to this night farmer's market it's called
Speaker 1: the Friday Night Munchies. They're from San Diego and they
Speaker 1: were in town and every time they come in town
Speaker 1: they want to see Fairhase. So I brought I brought
Speaker 1: her out to meet up with them and the grandma
Speaker 1: and the mom and uh, there's two sisters and one.
Speaker 1: I don't know how she's going to be like ten
Speaker 1: or whatever. My daughter's almost nine, and she looks at
Speaker 1: me and she's like my to my shoulder, but she's
Speaker 1: she's tall and lanky for a rage, right, she's up
Speaker 1: to my shoulder and she's like, I'm almost as tells you,
Speaker 1: I'm like that doesn't po This stuff doesn't bother me.
Speaker 1: The things you can't change don't bother me. And you
Speaker 1: know what, sadly enough, and I know this was just
Speaker 1: wasn't true because a lot of people I care about
Speaker 1: at all, a lot of tall people don't for some reason,
Speaker 1: last very long. Same thing with dogs. The bigger they are,
Speaker 1: the last last time you get with them kind of sucks,
Speaker 1: you know, like if you have a great dang and
Speaker 1: you get like eight years out of them, if you
Speaker 1: if you treat them right, eight to ten. Kind of shitty. Oh,
Speaker 1: the phone numbers for the show in case somebody wanted
Speaker 1: to call them any kind of commentary with anything that
Speaker 1: they that's on their mind about what's going on in
Speaker 1: the world these days. Antichrist productions. There you go. I'll
Speaker 1: put you up too so people know who I'm talking
Speaker 1: there right now. But there you go. It's for my
Speaker 1: it's for my uh my one A, it's my one
Speaker 1: eight hundred, my one nine one nine hundred number. Hey
Speaker 1: times are tough, bro Oh shit, yeah, no, you know
Speaker 1: you're right. Make sure your pets don't drink tap water, right,
Speaker 1: and you know it's really messed up about this water too,
Speaker 1: if there's any standing water anywhere. And I have to
Speaker 1: say that this can't just be from the air and
Speaker 1: then coming down like the you know whatever, there's some
Speaker 1: kind of spoor or whatever. It's gotta be something that's
Speaker 1: not filtered out of the water. And I'm not using
Speaker 1: any kind of scientific method to figure this out, but
Speaker 1: it just very oddly that there's this orange slime that
Speaker 1: will form like it like we have a tray like
Speaker 1: a rack for dishes that are drying, and then there's
Speaker 1: a little catch and every once in a while we
Speaker 1: have to scrub that and you know, sanitize or whatever,
Speaker 1: because it will start to get orange bowld on it.
Speaker 1: Anytime there's like a little bit standing water from the tap,
Speaker 1: there's this orange crap in it. And I get orange
Speaker 1: slime in my water bottle. Sometimes it's metal and it's
Speaker 1: freaking huge, So I have to get in there with
Speaker 1: like a big stick and a freaking thing at the
Speaker 1: end and try to get it all out. It's gross.
Speaker 1: I used like one of those blue mechanic cloths and
Speaker 1: put on the end of a stick and just wipe
Speaker 1: it around. Your correct times are tough and may get
Speaker 1: tougher with this is Israel versus around conflict escalating. Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: and thank you for reminding me that I wanted to
Speaker 1: talk about that. Yeah, of course they do. Yeah, this says,
Speaker 1: I believe me. I have a cha trinocular microscope yere
Speaker 1: the ones that you can turn to different Yeah, yes,
Speaker 1: settinks and then do microscopy. I know they poison the water,
Speaker 1: and what they were up to I used to do.
Speaker 5: Uh.
Speaker 1: I used to be really fascinated by that stuff when
Speaker 1: I was in high school and college and I had
Speaker 1: the funniest thing is I had foot in my ee
Speaker 1: for a while and I kept on seeing that like
Speaker 1: reflecting back in the microscope. So that screwed me up
Speaker 1: a lot. So anyway, yeah, fluoridation. So we go to
Speaker 1: a place that has I forgot what they said, and
Speaker 1: then who knows how well this has done. But there's
Speaker 1: this like multiple multiple filtration thing, plus it's reverse osmosis.
Speaker 1: But I still say that without distillation, and even then,
Speaker 1: like fluoriide is literally the hardest thing in the world
Speaker 1: to get out of anything once it's in there bodies, spines, water,
Speaker 1: and even after that you get through all that, what
Speaker 1: kind of trauma was in that water? Because of all
Speaker 1: this shit that it's gone through, sometimes literally before it
Speaker 1: got to that filtration process. So structuring it is important too,
Speaker 1: because then you're swallowing trauma. If you're not eating all
Speaker 1: the psych meds that everybody else has been taking that's
Speaker 1: mixed in with the water, then you're also then you're
Speaker 1: at least getting the trauma that goes along with it.
Speaker 1: Water has memory. It's a good thing, except in a
Speaker 1: world where people know that and don't tell you about
Speaker 1: it and manipulate that against you, then then it's not
Speaker 1: a good thing. I had something I wanted to show you. Okay,
Speaker 1: here it is.
Speaker 5: That was quick.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty happy with myself now. I don't really that
Speaker 1: oh so simper frillc dot com that you see I'm
Speaker 1: not looking at myself on the screen right now. But
Speaker 1: I'm gonna go like that and see if I'm right.
Speaker 1: Uh check that out please. You can get to all
Speaker 1: the links for doctor Glenn and DOCTORMANSO and my hot
Speaker 1: sauce and my book and the creatine and if I
Speaker 1: get around to it, I'm gonna try to see I
Speaker 1: have an integrity thing, right, like if I'm big on integrity,
Speaker 1: which isn't a bad thing at all. But here's here's
Speaker 1: my issue is, how does anybody know if you're using powders,
Speaker 1: they have different densities, they have different molecular structures and
Speaker 1: tensil strength all that stuff, right, and how they settle
Speaker 1: will be will just be determined under their natural state.
Speaker 1: How do you make a powder with multiple different types
Speaker 1: of whatever you want to say, amino acids or whatever
Speaker 1: heck you're putting in a pre workout? So let's say
Speaker 1: you're you know, a dose a good a good heavy
Speaker 1: dose for like el citraline is five to six grams
Speaker 1: per serving. Okay, if you want to make thirty sibings
Speaker 1: of that, you multiply that by five, You throw it
Speaker 1: in some sort of container, and then you throw whatever
Speaker 1: else you're gonna put in. You mix it in like
Speaker 1: a food process or something. But then what's the integrity
Speaker 1: level of it staying perfectly you know, you know, you
Speaker 1: don't say what I'm saying, like, is it evenly distributed
Speaker 1: throughout the entire product after you're done? How how do
Speaker 1: you know you're not scooping up like when you're getting
Speaker 1: their scoop of like the five grams of this and
Speaker 1: the one gram of the thing and the you know,
Speaker 1: that's the intention, that's the intent, But there's nothing that's
Speaker 1: show that says that that's what you're getting in a scoop.
Speaker 1: It's going to vary from one to the other. And
Speaker 1: that's the thing that I have a problem with making
Speaker 1: a pre workout because I don't I don't know how.
Speaker 1: Is it just because nobody gives a shit? That sucks,
Speaker 1: you know, like nobody thinks about that stuff? I don't think. Okay.
Speaker 1: President Donald Trump livers in Mars before signing a series
Speaker 1: of bills related to California's vehicle emission standards. Jesus Christ. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they way to throw that in there. During an event
Speaker 1: in the East Room of the White House. Now, remember
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom, who could either be considered the living American
Speaker 1: Psycho or maybe George Hamilton with the super tan and
Speaker 1: the silver back hair. He's calling for Trump to stand
Speaker 1: downsid resign, blah blah blah blah blah. Of course he is.
Speaker 1: But it's all part of the game. It's all part
Speaker 1: of the soap opera for the low comprehension people. They're
Speaker 1: all working for the same assholes. And Governor Jerry Brown
Speaker 1: and that family and the newsoms have a very long,
Speaker 1: very tight, almost incestuous relationship, CNN. So right off the bat,
Speaker 1: the you want to call it communists, you want to
Speaker 1: call it the CIA, and then you want to take
Speaker 1: your pick, right. President Donald Trump told CNN in a
Speaker 1: brief phone call Friday that the United States, of course,
Speaker 1: of course, of course, I'm the silver crown King of
Speaker 1: the Torah support Israel because they're banks on us and
Speaker 1: we created Israel. Of course we support them. They're the
Speaker 1: ones who start the conflicts, so America doesn't always look
Speaker 1: like the aggression. We can still pretend to be the
Speaker 1: good guy, and then we get called in when someone
Speaker 1: hurts them because they're the ones who It's like, it's
Speaker 1: like our dog just bits somebody's ankle and the guy
Speaker 1: wants to sue, so we go and bomb them and
Speaker 1: see how that works. It's perfect. Uh supports Israel and
Speaker 1: called the country's strikes on Iran overnight a very successful attack.
Speaker 1: That's a nice way of saying unworrited active war while
Speaker 1: warning Iran to make a nuclear deal. So no, no,
Speaker 1: uh uh, nothing spoken of, Hey, why did why did
Speaker 1: Israel decide to do this? What weapons of mass destruction?
Speaker 1: Does Iran have that we're supposed to be ten they
Speaker 1: have when we know full well the Israel stacked to
Speaker 1: the freaking teeth, even though they sometimes will say we
Speaker 1: have five hundred warheads and other times to say we
Speaker 1: don't tactically have any, or your we don't, we still
Speaker 1: didn't they even say this. They don't even say we
Speaker 1: don't anymore. They say we've never we've never confirmed that
Speaker 1: we have any. And this is what may have been
Speaker 1: one of the lah deciding factors. There are reasons for
Speaker 1: uh JFK getting off is that he wanted to inspect
Speaker 1: Demona and he was getting dicked around, and he was
Speaker 1: dead set against Israel becoming a nuclear uh being nuclear
Speaker 1: nuclearly equipped, which is smart because once they were what
Speaker 1: they do, they ran around picking fights and then called
Speaker 1: us in to fix it because that's what their job
Speaker 1: is to do. And we work and operate for the banks.
Speaker 1: It's a whole little system Federal Reserve Bank of England.
Speaker 1: These entities are what created Israel through looting our country
Speaker 1: who created the Cheka because we created the Bolshevik revolution,
Speaker 1: we funded it through the liquidation of the true wealth
Speaker 1: of this nation. Via the Federal Reserve. Once they planted themselves,
Speaker 1: technically the gold didn't belong to us anymore. What was
Speaker 1: handed over without a fight. That's also the other thing.
Speaker 1: You have your own infiltrators in the right spots. And again,
Speaker 1: this doesn't have as a shallow of a history as
Speaker 1: nineteen thirteen. It goes at least as far back as
Speaker 1: the Civil War. And that's what we're going to continue
Speaker 1: to talk about later on. When asked about a statement
Speaker 1: from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who's another Zionist psychopath,
Speaker 1: on Thursday that sought to put distance between the US
Speaker 1: and the Israel action, Trump told Dana Bash, we of
Speaker 1: course support Israel obviously and support it like nobody has
Speaker 1: ever supported it. Well, it's it is our baby, right,
Speaker 1: it's our little Brady child expressing itself the way the
Speaker 1: controllers of this country have to be more reserved, at
Speaker 1: least in the tough for the time being, and can't
Speaker 1: overtly behave the same way Israel does. And if Israel
Speaker 1: gets bombed, if you ever see the map of how
Speaker 1: many registered sex offenders, child predators, pedophiles are living in Israel,
Speaker 1: like it would be hard for them not to hit
Speaker 1: a large group of them. We wouldn't. I would have
Speaker 1: a hard time believing that it wouldn't be that everybody
Speaker 1: who would be a casualty would be a total loss
Speaker 1: to the world. You know, aaran should have listen and
Speaker 1: why is that? Why do they have to have a
Speaker 1: safe haven, a sanctuary for child predators and perverted people,
Speaker 1: Because that's part of their ancient cult that goes way
Speaker 1: beyond and well before the Talmud, Judaism, the weirdness of Catholicism.
Speaker 1: It's well Islam, it goes well before that. It's a
Speaker 1: saturn cult. It's the same different names, same routines and actions,
Speaker 1: and it's it's it's not just an extracurricular activity that
Speaker 1: these people like to engage in. It's part of their
Speaker 1: ritual practice. You can't have one without the other. And
Speaker 1: that's a problem. It's a big problem when the majority
Speaker 1: of the of the world is convinced that they need
Speaker 1: to somehow defend this, because by defending these stupid names
Speaker 1: that they've made for themselves that are completely illegitimate, like Judaism.
Speaker 5: Then.
Speaker 1: We're actually defending and enabling them to continue to do
Speaker 1: these sick, evil practices. And Michael Collins Piper's book. I
Speaker 1: got to remind everybody when they see when they keep
Speaker 1: talking about Third Temple, this book was written. I think
Speaker 1: I can't remember if it was in Final Judgment or
Speaker 1: if it was in the Golm. I think it might
Speaker 1: have been in the Golum, so it might have only
Speaker 1: been like fifteen years ago, give or take, but maybe
Speaker 1: it was even less than that. Now it was about
Speaker 1: fifteen years ago, but I think they said that, you know,
Speaker 1: the code to be cracked is that when people start
Speaker 1: talking Third Temple, they're talking about initiating nuclear war, meeting Israel,
Speaker 1: initiating nuclear AMAgeddon. So building of the Third Temple is
Speaker 1: a euphemism. So don't keep going yeah, yeah, yeah, you
Speaker 1: know Brett Heifer's and Jesus is coming, Yeah yeah, Jesus
Speaker 1: is coming. All Right, you're dead, motherfucker. Let's see where
Speaker 1: did we leave off. The President went on to urge
Speaker 1: Iran to reach a deal. Hey, we're going to insult you,
Speaker 1: we're going to breach your borders, we're going to murder people.
Speaker 1: And and Iran, I guarantee you is swarming with people
Speaker 1: who are saboteurs and opportunists who are you know, agents
Speaker 1: who are waiting in the wings to terraform that country
Speaker 1: into something that's more international banker friendly, meaning Israel friendly
Speaker 1: proxy control, just like they do everywhere else. They topple
Speaker 1: a leader. Either they assassinate the head and they change
Speaker 1: the nature of the country and no one's told that
Speaker 1: it's a it's completely under the hands of the same
Speaker 1: international bankers now, or they have a massive war and
Speaker 1: they still topple the leaders and install their puppet regime.
Speaker 1: And other cases they do what they did with the
Speaker 1: you know, they betray somebody like they did with Shan
Speaker 1: Khai Shak and then they have a MAO and then
Speaker 1: that's forever oive controlled China. And as we said in
Speaker 1: the last video, as it's been told in history, the
Speaker 1: nuclear program of Israel, they worked hand in hand with
Speaker 1: Red China to develop their nuclear program. Why would they
Speaker 1: have done that because of this same milk when you
Speaker 1: get right down to it, the same controllers, the same
Speaker 1: international bankers. Aaran should have listened to me when I said,
Speaker 1: you know, I gave them I don't know if you know,
Speaker 1: but I gave them a sixty day warning. And today
Speaker 1: is day sixty one. What who the hell are you man?
Speaker 1: This is more. This is what terrorism is. It's making threats,
Speaker 1: it's extortion. It's telling other people in other countries, sovereign nations,
Speaker 1: that they had to somehow bend to your will because
Speaker 1: they said so and no other reason. And if you
Speaker 1: don't bend to their will and acknowledge them and stop
Speaker 1: doing something or they never even confirmed that Iron did
Speaker 1: anything as far as creating their own nuclear arsenal. But
Speaker 1: if you had an aggressive country like Israel is constantly
Speaker 1: threatening everybody, wouldn't that be if you had no other
Speaker 1: desire in the world to even develop nuclear anything other
Speaker 1: outside of energy, wouldn't that be kind of like a
Speaker 1: reason to do so. So don't they create their own
Speaker 1: problem and then blame everybody else? Of course they do so. Again,
Speaker 1: We're chasing, we're chasing vapor and giving ultimatums, and we're
Speaker 1: supposed to be okay with this, the tough totalitarianism. It
Speaker 1: is all fine and good until you realize that it
Speaker 1: can be turned against the people of America as well,
Speaker 1: And then oopsie, well it's not me yet, right, sounds great?
Speaker 1: They should now come to the table and make a deal.
Speaker 1: This guy a deal over what how do they how
Speaker 1: are they supposed to uh sure, or convince you know,
Speaker 1: countries that don't want to hear it that they don't
Speaker 1: have something. When they're up there, they're made objective is
Speaker 1: to annihilate the place and take at least political control
Speaker 1: over it so that they can take the resources. This
Speaker 1: isn't about anything else. There's no threat to end Israel.
Speaker 1: The only threat would be is if if Israel started
Speaker 1: trying to drill or build, you know, their planned canals
Speaker 1: or whatever, you know that's going to go through the
Speaker 1: West Bank and all that not really into Iran. But
Speaker 1: if they don't, if they don't dominate it first, well,
Speaker 1: the only thing that would be a threat it would
Speaker 1: be them saying, you know, what the hell you doing here?
Speaker 1: So it's all it's all bullshit. The whole reasoning behind this.
Speaker 1: They want the resources, They want total ruled control of resources.
Speaker 1: He says they should come to the table to make
Speaker 1: a deal before it's too late. What does that mean?
Speaker 1: What are they what are they guilty of? So why
Speaker 1: are you threatening them? It would be too late for them.
Speaker 1: You know, the people I was dealing with are dead,
Speaker 1: the hardliners. Oh isn't that convenient the people so nationalists,
Speaker 1: and that's what I was saying when I was talking
Speaker 1: to people in the telegram. Those who actually have nationalistic
Speaker 1: you know that they would they wouldn't bend on the
Speaker 1: principles of the sovereignty of the country. Of course, those
Speaker 1: are the ones that got targeted and killed, because in volunteer,
Speaker 1: I'm sure help them find those people so they could
Speaker 1: target them more easily, make sure they got their man.
Speaker 1: So the only people that would be left are those
Speaker 1: who are bendable, who don't have the same principles, and
Speaker 1: they'll continue to kill off those people who would be
Speaker 1: freedom fighters who would want you know, who would be
Speaker 1: more like a Gaddafi type of character, caring about his country.
Speaker 1: And they'll put people that are more easily multiple, or
Speaker 1: they'll put their own people in there that have been
Speaker 1: there the whole time, you know, working double agent style
Speaker 1: through military intelligence, Israeli intelligence or whatever. And I guarantee
Speaker 1: you that's all a huge element there in Iran. He
Speaker 1: would not specify which people he was referring to. How
Speaker 1: about the dead ones. There's three of what plus the
Speaker 1: scientists which probably weren't them, So it was probably more
Speaker 1: likely the generals or whatever. In contrasting Trump's aggressive tone,
Speaker 1: Rubio clarified in a statement late late Thursday that the
Speaker 1: US had no involvement in the strikes. Well, it's plans here,
Speaker 1: nothing happens. It's not these these ideas that issueal is
Speaker 1: just this loose cannon. You know, rabid dog is cute
Speaker 1: and all, but these are all things that are designed
Speaker 1: and developed long in advance, with a whole ritualistic you know,
Speaker 1: timing to them, and it's done by the Central Banks.
Speaker 1: And one of those is right here in America, one
Speaker 1: of the biggest ones, the biggest one. Tonight, Israel took
Speaker 1: unilateral action. So it's funny, Okay, we have nothing, We're
Speaker 1: not involved in it, but I'm going to make all
Speaker 1: the ultimatiums and threats. Tell me that doesn't sound a
Speaker 1: little weird. That's like saying, no, we didn't do it,
Speaker 1: our army did. No, we didn't do it, our special
Speaker 1: ops did. Well, what the fuck symptom? You know, And
Speaker 1: you can't keep thinking that Israel is a separate entity.
Speaker 1: It's like the fifty first state. In contrast to yeah,
Speaker 1: I said that tonight, Israel took a unilateral action against Iran.
Speaker 1: We are not involved in the strikes against Iran, and
Speaker 1: our top priority is protecting the American forces in the region.
Speaker 1: Stay the fuck out of the region. Trump spoke with
Speaker 1: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin and Yahoo on Friday. A White
Speaker 1: House official said he'd spoken to the Prime Minister several
Speaker 1: times on Thursday and Cleaning prior to Israeli or Israel
Speaker 1: strike Israel launching the strikes, he's of familiar with the discussion,
Speaker 1: told CNN, did you even see how they're trying to
Speaker 1: diminish the retaliation? They're like, oh, they sent out one
Speaker 1: hundred drones and only seven of them got through and
Speaker 1: hit targets. When they're talking about the counter strike of Iran,
Speaker 1: it's like they're like children the way they have to like,
Speaker 1: you know, they build up themselves. Oh, surgical, amazing, like
Speaker 1: the beeper thing ingenius that we blew up a bunch
Speaker 1: of beepers. You know, they're so congratulatory of themselves, and
Speaker 1: then when other people get them, they're like, ah, they
Speaker 1: barely even touched us. This is just a flesh wound.
Speaker 1: It's like, what the fuck am I listening to you
Speaker 1: right now? And then if they yeah, they'll say that,
Speaker 1: and then at the same time they'll tell you about
Speaker 1: the perfect tragedy of the two people who do get killed,
Speaker 1: and how we're supposed to feel bad for that, and
Speaker 1: forget about all the dead bodies in Gaza that they've
Speaker 1: been stacking up with children's inwards and you know, spread
Speaker 1: across a mile on the ground because of their bombs.
Speaker 1: That that's not a tragedy. But some fucking jew who
Speaker 1: was collateral damage for an actual strategic strike on a
Speaker 1: military site. That's a tragedy, and they're gonna tell you
Speaker 1: all the sad stories about it. Meanwhile, the IDEF can
Speaker 1: kill any of those really as they want, and you know,
Speaker 1: just more people. They can blame their enemy for their enemies,
Speaker 1: and you know, I don't even know if the enemy
Speaker 1: is the right word, because that would record that, in
Speaker 1: my mind, presupposes that the other country would organically be
Speaker 1: in opposition to them or fuel some animosity to where
Speaker 1: they couldn't live with their existence. That's not really the case.
Speaker 1: It's the opposite. Israel can't bear the existence of other
Speaker 1: nations anywhere or the I'm sorry that colts can't. And
Speaker 1: those people live right here as well. The operator government
Speaker 1: and the runner finances, our media or education where fucked
Speaker 1: and or tech. White House officials continue to argue that
Speaker 1: the President is committed to salvaging the nuclear talks. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so again the assumption being that there's something there to
Speaker 1: worry about, And how is this not sounding a lot
Speaker 1: more like a weapons of mass destruction a racket era,
Speaker 1: The source said. Special Envoy Steve Whitcoffs is ready to
Speaker 1: meet Iranian officials when they are, whether it be in
Speaker 1: Oman on Sunday as previously scheduled, or as some day
Speaker 1: thereafter there was a murderer committed with bombs, But you
Speaker 1: want them just to come sit down and have a
Speaker 1: little chat. Fuck you. These actions should be they should
Speaker 1: be whatever is you're dealing is other countries to see
Speaker 1: this as an America's involvement, regardless they claim it that
Speaker 1: they did it or not, because that's their puppy that
Speaker 1: they unleashed. That's the one that bit the neighbor. The
Speaker 1: President had warned Iran earlier on Friday to agree to
Speaker 1: a nuclear deal before there is nothing left. Now, that's
Speaker 1: fucking extortion, that's threats, that's ultimatums. That's terrorists, right, that's terrorism.
Speaker 1: We're going to kill every last one of you. So
Speaker 1: what position do you want somebody to come to a
Speaker 1: table with negotiations if you are of the mind that
Speaker 1: they have no bargaining chips. You just said they have
Speaker 1: no bargaining chips by saying we could decimate you and
Speaker 1: wouldn't even be a bother to us before there's nothing left.
Speaker 1: That's what that means. We can decimate you whenever we
Speaker 1: feel like and it'd be like, no sweat off our brow.
Speaker 1: So how do you how do you say something like
Speaker 1: that and then still give the other party the impression
Speaker 1: that they have something, some sort of some sort of
Speaker 1: bargaining Uh, you know, tool they don't, so they have
Speaker 1: to give over everything. That's a shakedown, suggesting in a
Speaker 1: social media post that the subsequent Israeli attacks on the
Speaker 1: country will be even more brutal. But they're not. But
Speaker 1: America's not doing it. They just can predict the future
Speaker 1: in their crystal ball. Yeah, it's not a coordinated thing,
Speaker 1: just because Israel is the one actually conducting it. See
Speaker 1: what I'm saying here, How America is the same entity
Speaker 1: even though they're pretending to gut their hands off, Like,
Speaker 1: how do other nations not see this or are they
Speaker 1: just too afraid to speak it aloud because if they do,
Speaker 1: then they know they'll get bombed next simply for knowing
Speaker 1: that truth and speaking out. It's that's anti AMers emch
Speaker 1: the fuck. The post marked Trump's first public comments since
Speaker 1: Israel launched strikes on Iran targeting its nuclear program and
Speaker 1: military leaders, with the US president saying he had tried
Speaker 1: to steer Iranian leaders toward diplomacy, but they failed to
Speaker 1: act at great cost diplomacy on your terms. That's not diplomacy.
Speaker 1: That's you want them to submit, get down on one
Speaker 1: knee and like your damn shoot. I gave it ron
Speaker 1: chance after a chance to make a deal. I hate this,
Speaker 1: even the phrasing here. It sounds so cheap and ridiculous
Speaker 1: and like a fucking TV show because he is an
Speaker 1: actor and he's full of shit. Make a deal, okay,
Speaker 1: all right, And so we have Hubby Mandel for a
Speaker 1: fucking president. Deal or no deal. Let me talk to
Speaker 1: the bankers. It's the same fucking thing, right, open open,
Speaker 1: five more open, five more chests or five more cases? Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: ring and ring ring, Hello, it's the whole we're in
Speaker 1: a game show, and it's a bad one because people
Speaker 1: die in it. I told them and the strongest of words,
Speaker 1: to just do it. Oh, Nike's gonna sue you now.
Speaker 1: But no matter how hard they tried, no matter how
Speaker 1: close they got, they just couldn't get it done. But
Speaker 1: then we killed those people who were hard noses, hardliners, right,
Speaker 1: so now that everything should work out just fine, because
Speaker 1: we'll murder you if you don't. And then if we
Speaker 1: and he just basically said, and if that doesn't work,
Speaker 1: we'll kill more of you, more of the people that
Speaker 1: we that Palenteer tells us are strong resistors. We'll probably
Speaker 1: get it wrong eighty percent of the time, but hey,
Speaker 1: the threat of being murdered will still come across pretty clearly.
Speaker 1: Trump wrote that Iranian leaders didn't know what was about
Speaker 1: to happen. Has nobody talked about whatever nuclear fallout could
Speaker 1: be occurring right now because of the strikes at the
Speaker 1: nuclear plant, which, by the way, if there's big gaping holes,
Speaker 1: and would they not have assumed that there's probably no
Speaker 1: weapons of NASA destruction there before they bombed it, and
Speaker 1: if they're poisoning Iran the same way they did with Fukushima,
Speaker 1: which was deliberate. The stuck's in that virus, all that stuff.
Speaker 1: The cooling system for the reactors was shut down thirty
Speaker 1: minutes prior to the quote unquote earthquake, the conveniently timed
Speaker 1: earthquake that destroyed most especially the reactor that they had
Speaker 1: a bunch of spent rods next to creating the perfect
Speaker 1: the biggest dirty bomb on the planet that's still pumping
Speaker 1: out radiation. And Japan was resistant to one thing or another,
Speaker 1: and they called that nuclear blackmail because then they then
Speaker 1: they ruined their country with that. And now it seems
Speaker 1: like Iron is suffering something similar. And you know the
Speaker 1: I think I showed you on the last one.
Speaker 9: It was.
Speaker 1: Magna BSP. And there's another one that was listed in
Speaker 1: like Collins Piper's book, that are Israeli companies that do
Speaker 1: the security for everyone of the nuclear plants in America
Speaker 1: and their Israeli let me repeat that, but they were
Speaker 1: also the ones who handled all the Japanese ones or
Speaker 1: and most of obviously this one in Fukushima and most
Speaker 1: other countries in the world. So they have people who
Speaker 1: can sabotage your country and make it into wasteland like
Speaker 1: sermodable or worse, because I don't know, I don't know.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of weirdness about that incident. But they
Speaker 1: can do that anytime they want to. So even if
Speaker 1: they don't launch missiles, they could literally do the same
Speaker 1: type of damage in your country by sabotage. So I mean,
Speaker 1: that's a pretty big oversight. It's pretty stupid to have
Speaker 1: them involved in countries they don't belong in as security,
Speaker 1: Like why couldn't other country just handle little own security?
Speaker 1: So it's really weird, like who allowed that? Who made
Speaker 1: that happen? So that this overarching world banking institution had
Speaker 1: that much power behind the lines of all these borders
Speaker 1: of these alleged separate countries, because once they're under the
Speaker 1: control of the bank, there no there is no separation,
Speaker 1: just in our minds that we see on the map,
Speaker 1: that they could just at any given time, like piano keys,
Speaker 1: just pom pom pom pom and blow up freaking nuclear
Speaker 1: power plants and completely devastate a place. So how do
Speaker 1: you fight that? Trump wrote that Iranian leaders didn't know
Speaker 1: what was about to happen. They were all dead now
Speaker 1: and it will only get worse. So we had nothing
Speaker 1: to do with it. But I just I threatened them
Speaker 1: ahead of time. I'm and now I'm gloating after, but
Speaker 1: I had nothing to do with it, and we're not
Speaker 1: totally the same fucking entity? Can I? Can I continue
Speaker 1: to repeat this?
Speaker 8: Right?
Speaker 1: Just like just like our country, they had nothing to
Speaker 1: do with the the Nordon pipeline. Right. Yeah, there has
Speaker 1: already been great death and destruction, but there is still
Speaker 1: time to make this slaughter with the next already planned
Speaker 1: attacks being even more brutal, come to an end again.
Speaker 1: How who talks like this except for a psychopath? And
Speaker 1: why is this okay? And why are Americans okay with this?
Speaker 1: What is it about Iran that we hate so much?
Speaker 1: What is it? Is it a are we conflating this
Speaker 1: with something to do with nine to eleven or what
Speaker 1: they told us about Libya that wasn't true most of
Speaker 1: the time. When these people from Arab countries quote unquote
Speaker 1: come out and look all Arabi, it's fucking not even
Speaker 1: them or some people that they've radicalized through some sort
Speaker 1: of psychological operation that go out as representatives of that country.
Speaker 1: Just like these idiots in these protests waving Palestinian flags
Speaker 1: that are doing stupid shit that doesn't represent the entire country,
Speaker 1: doesn't represent everything. So what is it that we hate
Speaker 1: about round? Just simply that Israel the biggest lying sacks
Speaker 1: of shit who've melted your brains with three Abrahamic religions
Speaker 1: that are complete lies, that have killed JFK, that have
Speaker 1: taken down and murdered three thousand plus people in broad
Speaker 1: daylight once again in front of your face in New
Speaker 1: York City. Who it seems like now that I'm looking
Speaker 1: at this shit with Schmooley and all this other stuff,
Speaker 1: probably were involved with the poisoning death, the overdose of
Speaker 1: Michael Jackson. If that doesn't piss people off, if nothing
Speaker 1: else pisses p people off about what's been going on,
Speaker 1: Like that guy was loved by the whole entire world
Speaker 1: and the fucking Jews kill them? Like what else is
Speaker 1: there about these talking people that you will side with
Speaker 1: whatever the hell they say and never question it. Are
Speaker 1: you afraid of them? Well that's why they have powers,
Speaker 1: because you are afraid. You know how you fix that?
Speaker 1: Stand for something. A sixth round of nuclear deal talks
Speaker 1: was still scheduled to take place in Aman on Sunday,
Speaker 1: as previously scheduled, according to two sources familiar with the matter,
Speaker 1: so Trump didn't like the fact that it was there
Speaker 1: was a process and the whole time. The biggest resistance
Speaker 1: to this is simply, Hey, Israel is a fucking bunch
Speaker 1: of psychopathic, sociopathic child killers with bombs and they're really
Speaker 1: close by. Do you want us to what disarm in
Speaker 1: the presence of this Gee, I'm surprised Iran had any
Speaker 1: problems with that, because how long before then they start
Speaker 1: rating them like they did what they're doing with every
Speaker 1: fucking country around them at the moment, and now Iran too.
Speaker 1: And if you do anything back, if you do anything back,
Speaker 1: if you fight back, if you lift your hands to
Speaker 1: protect yourself, we're taking you down, says America, says Trump.
Speaker 1: But we're totally not involved in this. Special envoy Steve
Speaker 1: Whitcoff interesting last name, was in touch with the Almani's
Speaker 1: overnight in an effort to keep the plans for this
Speaker 1: weekend on track, sources said, But those sources acknowledge that
Speaker 1: holding the talks this weekend is highly unlikely. Yeah, they
Speaker 1: need a little time, you know, to bury their fucking
Speaker 1: dead and whatever other crisis is called being caused because
Speaker 1: of I don't know, spillage of I Dine one thirty
Speaker 1: three or what the hell might be the radioactive components
Speaker 1: that are speeling out of that place. AMON has facilitated
Speaker 1: the US Iran talks to date, despite several rounds of talks,
Speaker 1: meeting I Ron probably won't show up as well as
Speaker 1: getting out despite several rounds of talks between Iran and
Speaker 1: the US. To thrash out, that's a weird word to use,
Speaker 1: thrash out a new nuclear deal. Thrashing is like, like,
Speaker 1: that's a weird way hash out. I think this person
Speaker 1: just heard hash out and never fucking understood that they
Speaker 1: were saying hash and not thrash like the way people
Speaker 1: like completely mispronounce certain words and they write it that
Speaker 1: way too, you know what I mean? Like idiots. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think this article writer is a more on major
Speaker 1: sticking points remain with around insisting on its right to
Speaker 1: nuclear enrichment. Yeah. Yeah, they don't have to tell what.
Speaker 1: They don't have to get the permission of any fucking buddy.
Speaker 1: And like every other country has said many times, their
Speaker 1: desire to pursue any sort of weapons of quote unquote
Speaker 1: mass destruction are simply because there's a hostile country who
Speaker 1: wants to kill everybody in this world and they live
Speaker 1: really close to them. Without that element, everything would settle down.
Speaker 1: So maybe instead of fighting all these other countries, I'm
Speaker 1: just saying one is a smaller number than everyone else.
Speaker 1: Trump said earlier this week that he's grown less confident
Speaker 1: of being able to strike a deal. Of course, of
Speaker 1: course that's the narrative, because you know, if he was confident,
Speaker 1: then there would be no reason for these strikes, and
Speaker 1: because it's a completely stupid, horrible thing to put somebody
Speaker 1: in the position to have to do. And they're not
Speaker 1: looking to actually come to an agreement, they're looking to
Speaker 1: come for their heads. So of course he's not able
Speaker 1: to strike a deal. I thought he was the art
Speaker 1: of the deal fucking guy, and that word just irritates me,
Speaker 1: and so it sounds so cheap and ignorant. Let's make
Speaker 1: a deal. Saying in an interview earlier this week that
Speaker 1: Tehran could be delaying an agreement, delaying, well, it's they're
Speaker 1: right to fucking do whatever they don't. They're not obligated
Speaker 1: to even talk to your stupid ass. Trump warned if
Speaker 1: possibly possiblyity okay, okay, I thought it was possibly and
Speaker 1: I was like, no, was no, that's Trump warned a
Speaker 1: possibility of massive conflict in Middle East. Trump had warned
Speaker 1: earlier on Thursday of the possibility that massive conflict in
Speaker 1: abilities could take place soon, but totally not involved in it,
Speaker 1: totally had nothing to do with it, totally completely unaware
Speaker 1: of the whole thing. He's just a good He's no
Speaker 1: stra dumbass. US officials were increasingly concerned that the risk
Speaker 1: of issueal striking Iran had risen after TRON said on
Speaker 1: Thursday that it would ramp up its nuclear activities due
Speaker 1: to the International Atomic Energy Agency passing a resolution saying
Speaker 1: that the country was not in compliance with its non
Speaker 1: proliferation commitments. Senior US officials told CNN, Yeah, again, why
Speaker 1: does anybody have who runs the commissions? People who want
Speaker 1: a lopsided fight? That's who questioned about the potential strike earlier, Like,
Speaker 1: nobody's obligated to the country's theirs and a country is
Speaker 1: there so for them to run however they want, as
Speaker 1: long as they're not interfering with other countries' activities. And
Speaker 1: it seems to me that the only person jumping up
Speaker 1: over the boarding borderline and fucking with somebody is Israel,
Speaker 1: were your your threat to us? Who threw the first punch?
Speaker 1: I did because he's a threat. Tail out to a
Speaker 1: cop question about a potential strike earlier today, Trump said
Speaker 1: it could very well happen. So they weren't just like,
Speaker 1: you know, foreshadowing this and completely aware of everything that
Speaker 1: was going to happen, because it was already settled here
Speaker 1: right here, that it was going to happen. I don't
Speaker 1: want to say imminent, but it's something that could very
Speaker 1: well happen. Trump total, reporters, we just said heard the
Speaker 1: same thing. Basically as usnbsc's in the Middle East carried
Speaker 1: out emergency action assessments this week, and that process is
Speaker 1: going as the US monitors the threat the threat environment
Speaker 1: in the region. These people phrasings weird and that process
Speaker 1: is ongoing as the US monitors the threat environment in
Speaker 1: the region. The officials said that should at least be
Speaker 1: hyphenated if it doesn't make fucking sense together. This still
Speaker 1: from video from twenty twenty eight shows US embassy in Iraq, Okay,
Speaker 1: why why is that even there? Asked what the Israeli
Speaker 1: has told him to? Asked what the Israelis told him
Speaker 1: to prompt the departure of the US personnel from the region. Trump,
Speaker 1: you flied. They didn't tell me anything, but I said, look,
Speaker 1: there's a chance of massive conflict. He described the deliberations
Speaker 1: that led him to the decision. We have a lot
Speaker 1: of American people in this area. Why And I said, look,
Speaker 1: we got to tell them to get out because something
Speaker 1: could happen soon. And I don't want to be the
Speaker 1: one that didn't give any warning and missiles flying into
Speaker 1: their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it.
Speaker 1: You know, I had the choice, do I do it
Speaker 1: or not. Oh, he's a big hero because he warned
Speaker 1: a small group of people about something that may potentially happen,
Speaker 1: but didn't try to prevent it from happening, and was
Speaker 1: involved in the actually happening. But a hero that's to say,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna empathize with these people, but not with these
Speaker 1: other human beings who did nothing wrong. Yeah, great job.
Speaker 1: Hopefully that doesn't happen. I just skipped over doing. It
Speaker 1: has its downside, but it also has its upside, like
Speaker 1: you're going to save a lot of lives if it
Speaker 1: should happen again. He's pulling the vaccine saves lots of
Speaker 1: lives bullshit card. Meanwhile, people are dropping dead left and right,
Speaker 1: but he's still It's like, right, yeah, and how did
Speaker 1: that make it on the school schedule?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: Why are any of those things down there? Why is
Speaker 1: that a mandatory to take their public indoctrinage? First, you
Speaker 1: have to make your child into a drone who's gonna
Speaker 1: end up hating and presenting you, and the family tie
Speaker 1: is going to be meaningless to them. After they go
Speaker 1: through their their deculturalization and reprogramming or programming in public
Speaker 1: school to where they're not even going to be recognizable.
Speaker 1: You have lost your child. And the most tragic part
Speaker 1: about it is that they're still alive and there's no
Speaker 1: way you can reach them, and they're going to be
Speaker 1: completely in the hands of the state's mind control. And
Speaker 1: along the way you have to consent to poisoning them.
Speaker 1: But this is totally totally the American way. This is
Speaker 1: definitely not the Jewish system at all. You're so right,
Speaker 1: You're so right. What was I thinking Thursday? Trump in
Speaker 1: a twoth social post. You know that place that murders
Speaker 1: people in the middle of the night through no notck grades. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that one. Underscored his preference for diplomacy in Iran, saying
Speaker 1: his administration remains committed to a diplomatic resolution to iran
Speaker 1: nuclear issue. I got off with true social the moment
Speaker 1: that that happened when that seventy something year old man
Speaker 1: was shot at the Witching Hour in front of us
Speaker 1: on his front lawn because of a post on there.
Speaker 1: Trump also said he does not want Israel to target
Speaker 1: Iran as negotiations on a potential newclear deal continue, with
Speaker 1: a sixth round of talks set for Sunday. And I'm on,
Speaker 1: I want to have an agreement with Iran. We're fairly
Speaker 1: close to an agreement. You just said you weren't sure
Speaker 1: if you could ever get to one. You talk out
Speaker 1: of both sides of your mouth. As long as I
Speaker 1: think there is an agreement, I don't want them going
Speaker 1: in because that would blow it. Literally. Oh, you're a
Speaker 1: funny guy with their puns. Might help it actually, but
Speaker 1: also it could blow it, he said when asked about
Speaker 1: a potential airstrike. And it's like these people are so
Speaker 1: detached to what actually happens when people are bombed and shot.
Speaker 1: It's like they just say it so flippantly like it's
Speaker 1: not a big deal, like like they it's like murder
Speaker 1: to them is like pushing somebody and and and you know,
Speaker 1: antagonizing them like bullet is like that. That's not the same,
Speaker 1: very high different degrees of you know, irritation there when
Speaker 1: you murder somebody, or you murder their family versus or
Speaker 1: you start like nuclear fallout in their country versus hey
Speaker 1: pulling a hair on their head or something like that.
Speaker 1: You know, it's like it's not the same gays at all.
Speaker 5: Gays.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I didn't go on the Truth Social for Trump.
Speaker 1: I went on there because Sir Patrick McK I was
Speaker 1: trying to get in contact with him and I knew
Speaker 1: that he had a presence there. I found that he
Speaker 1: had a presence there, so that's why I went. And
Speaker 1: I had started as a guy with the hell build
Speaker 1: my channel and here some you know, and then I
Speaker 1: was like, nah, scrap. And then I saw that happen.
Speaker 1: I was like, yeah, I'm out hotly, I can talk
Speaker 1: to people or on different platforms and only be there.
Speaker 1: I'm just looking all right, So let's see if you
Speaker 1: can see that. No, that's not all right. So this
Speaker 1: is LT X. Now this is the studio where I
Speaker 1: had that one picture I had, I had pixelar pixel
Speaker 1: X that I said, you know, mister stuffle up against
Speaker 1: with muscles or something like that, but but a bodybuilder,
Speaker 1: and that's where they gave me the body. But they
Speaker 1: didn't give me the right head. So then I cut
Speaker 1: and I cut out the head and pasted it put
Speaker 1: it over the top of the stupid head that they
Speaker 1: had on there. It looked more like a monkey or
Speaker 1: a giraffe monkey. And then I had this thing, created
Speaker 1: three different pictures that were similar, and then I animated
Speaker 1: one of them that I look, you know, I haven't
Speaker 1: even touched you there too, So those became the animation
Speaker 1: that you see when I did the bristly phil up.
Speaker 1: I guess thing. But they only give you so much
Speaker 1: and then you have to pay for it. But if
Speaker 1: you have more than one Google sign in or some
Speaker 1: other email, I think you get that amount of free
Speaker 1: stuff each time. So I'm saving the other email accounts.
Speaker 1: I have to build that up. But it's LTx studio
Speaker 1: and it's a pretty good job. It's more advanced than
Speaker 1: the other ones I was using. This domo AI is
Speaker 1: not nearly as good, not even close. Like things move
Speaker 1: independently from another, like there's a wave going through the object.
Speaker 1: It's not so one portion here will move this way
Speaker 1: while the other portion we will see it like that
Speaker 1: that wave. You see that wave in that car. That's
Speaker 1: not good AI, that's shit. It's not really, it's just
Speaker 1: computer generated imagery with AI trying to make sense of it.
Speaker 1: That's the better way of saying it. All right, So
Speaker 1: we're at an hour and twenty nine. Bye bye. Let
Speaker 1: me check to see if there's anything that you want
Speaker 1: to instagram. I don't. I think there might be a
Speaker 1: couple of things. Yeah, okay, we got a couple more
Speaker 1: things on the Instagram here. I'm not making a face
Speaker 1: when I think I look like I'm mad and I'm not.
Speaker 1: That's my I get yelled at for it all the
Speaker 1: time if people or get people mayst understand what I'm doing.
Speaker 1: I'm why I'm doing it. My concentration face apparently looks
Speaker 1: like I'm pissed off, because when I'm listening to somebody,
Speaker 1: that face just happens. And I used to get yelled
Speaker 1: at by my dad all the time. Like what I
Speaker 1: can tell if I look in your face that you're
Speaker 1: disgusting with this and you're not really listening, like, well,
Speaker 1: you're you're awfully good psychoanalytics here, but it's completely fucking wrong.
Speaker 1: Let's see, let's go with you know, we love Earns,
Speaker 1: but uh, I think this one. I haven't listened to
Speaker 1: the whole thing yet, so let's start with this one.
Speaker 8: Why should the world tolerate you having nuclear weapons and
Speaker 8: not say you're a first? Again, we never admitted to
Speaker 8: have such a weapons.
Speaker 1: Right, yeah, yeah, they never minted to it. Sometimes they'll
Speaker 1: boast about how many they have and how many they
Speaker 1: have stockpiled. Other times they'll say that it all depends
Speaker 1: on their schizophrenic, you know, desires that day and what
Speaker 1: we're supposed to believe and listen to this rationale.
Speaker 8: But the very comparison.
Speaker 6: Is, I must say it's insulting. And they tell you
Speaker 6: why we've suffered one holocaust?
Speaker 8: We is it because of the Holocaust? But you should
Speaker 8: be allowed to have nuclear weapons? You know what?
Speaker 6: This interview was finished? Now you're attitude the so hostile
Speaker 6: and your question is.
Speaker 1: It really because he just asked questions. He didn't call
Speaker 1: you names, he didn't point a finger. He simply asked
Speaker 1: for an explanation. Is it because of the Holocaust card
Speaker 1: that you somehow think that you are able to have
Speaker 1: weapons and kill everybody else now and forever? And because
Speaker 1: that is the rationale? And you called it out and
Speaker 1: it sounds ridiculous when you hear it out loud, that
Speaker 1: he's going to cancel the interview and.
Speaker 6: Don't want to.
Speaker 8: Why should the world tolerate you having.
Speaker 1: Nuclear I just wanted that. I was going to say,
Speaker 1: let's later it one more time. But yeah.
Speaker 7: Important to note that the Rothchilds claimed to be Jewish,
Speaker 7: but are in fact Kazars from Mongolian Eastern Europe. Like Eisenhower,
Speaker 7: the rough Childs have Ezatic Mongolian genes and not genes
Speaker 7: of Judaic people. The rough Childs are like ninety of
Speaker 7: the Jews today and have kasar genes, and they are
Speaker 7: now known as Ashkarnazi Jews. But Georgia and.
Speaker 1: Ukraine, Yeah, but Ashkenazi's Turkish as well. It's not just Kazarian,
Speaker 1: maybe more Ukrainian in our eight.
Speaker 7: Hundred to one thousand miles north of Palestine. In fact,
Speaker 7: every prime minister of Israel has been a Kazar Ashkarnazi
Speaker 7: Jew with no connection to semi people at all.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's a big drop. Oh wait, there's more.
Speaker 7: An ultimatum was delivered by Russia and oyay.
Speaker 1: You know what, Try finding history on this, It's not easy.
Speaker 1: The ultimatum was delivered by Russia and other surrounding nations,
Speaker 1: impacted by.
Speaker 7: Other surrounding nations, and acted by the Cays. Are murders
Speaker 7: and robberies.
Speaker 1: Yes, they were the bandits on the road, right, the
Speaker 1: cutthroats and bandits all throughout history. These are the ones
Speaker 1: that I've talked about in the New History of the
Speaker 1: Jews by Eusa. Smolan's long prior, like Mesopotamian era prior,
Speaker 1: like we're talking super super old. This is always what
Speaker 1: they were known for. And it's not just this area,
Speaker 1: but this I'm talking about the attribute of merchants And
Speaker 1: I'm sorry merchants, thieves and cutthroats and bandits on the road,
Speaker 1: but that was what they would do. They would rob
Speaker 1: and murder and rape when people came through the territory,
Speaker 1: and they would go into other people's territory and do raids.
Speaker 7: They must reject paganism and choose between Judaism.
Speaker 1: And what kind of paganism was that, by chance, would
Speaker 1: that be the same Saturn cult firm forever? Would that
Speaker 1: be the Edenites.
Speaker 7: Yep, Christianity or Islam as their official state religion. The
Speaker 7: Kazarian king chose Judaism, but despite his promise.
Speaker 1: Yeah you know that thing that did have that star
Speaker 1: as a simple back then, Yeah, that one.
Speaker 7: Dark's kept practicing ancient pagan Babylonian black magic or secret.
Speaker 1: Satanism, Saturn cult worship that's not really worship, but you know,
Speaker 1: messing around with deemonology.
Speaker 7: The king malded these practices with Judaism and created a
Speaker 7: secret Satanic hybrid religion derived from Babylonian talenty.
Speaker 1: They didn't have to change Judaism to make it ugly.
Speaker 7: Was written by Hired Rabbis. The deep dark secret of
Speaker 7: the occult ceremonies was that they were all based on
Speaker 7: ancient ball worship, also known as.
Speaker 1: Worship of the how ball was balder Wodinism. That's going
Speaker 1: all the way back to the even Nite cult. These
Speaker 1: were all people at one time, but we're so nefarious,
Speaker 1: some of them so heroic, others that they were deified
Speaker 1: so horrific in other instances that they were brought, they
Speaker 1: were catapulted to uh saintlihood and godliness deification by those
Speaker 1: who venerate the more evil aspects of human nature or
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call that. I don't even know
Speaker 1: if that's human nature, some sort of nature.
Speaker 7: It involves child's sacrifice with bleedouts, blood drinking, and eating
Speaker 7: children's parts.
Speaker 1: So that's what we're protecting over there, that's who's bombing people.
Speaker 7: Yeah, these evil practices continued, and all these are part
Speaker 7: of the Kaisarin mafia today. In nine hundred eighty to
Speaker 7: twelve hundred eighty Russian conquest were made into the Kasar Kingdom.
Speaker 1: Oh, by the way, right around was it seven hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty or so, right around there? Seven twenty six
Speaker 1: something like that? What was the actual year that the Visigoths,
Speaker 1: because they accepted these Ois into their into their kingdom,
Speaker 1: were betrayed by them and the and and then they
Speaker 1: said the Anddulusian paradise. No, there was no paradise when
Speaker 1: they had their Muslim buddies ravaged that place. And the
Speaker 1: Jews are very well taken care of back then during
Speaker 1: that time. So therefore it was a golden era because
Speaker 1: wely people that matter are of them, of course.
Speaker 13: Eventually throwed most of them out. The Russian prince Suyato
Speaker 13: Slav made war upon the Kasars. The Russians created the
Speaker 13: gradual fall of the Khazars. So in a matter of
Speaker 13: a decade.
Speaker 1: Oh you mean, so there's no problem anymore? No, no, no, oh,
Speaker 1: look at that? What colors are those? Those are golf
Speaker 1: of Ukrainian don't they true?
Speaker 7: Moved most Kazar presence. Unfortunately, the Kazarian leaders had a
Speaker 7: well developed spy network and we were able to escape
Speaker 7: across Europe. Taking their vast fortune in.
Speaker 13: Gold and silver, they infiltrated Europe and Slavic nations and
Speaker 13: perhaps back into Asia, infecting many nations and city states,
Speaker 13: including as far as Venice, Spain and most of Central Era.
Speaker 13: And secret they continued their satanic child blood and sacrifice rituals,
Speaker 13: all for their trusted ball to give them the whole
Speaker 13: world and all its riches. Ever since, the Kaisars have plotted.
Speaker 7: Eternal revenge against the Russians and the surrounding nations that invaded.
Speaker 1: Kazaria and who funded that possibility for it to come
Speaker 1: to fruition when they already took control of us. It
Speaker 1: was our gold. It was our training right in New
Speaker 1: York that brought those exiled people right back into Russia
Speaker 1: for an invasion. And they got stopped in Canada, and
Speaker 1: the Canadian officials were told to let them go. And
Speaker 1: I think Trotsky was one of the ones that got stop.
Speaker 7: A matter of power. Important to know that the.
Speaker 1: Rut that's it as little too short. Oh I did twice,
Speaker 1: I did this, and that here's a finny one.
Speaker 12: Israel declares a state of emergency after striking Iran's capital.
Speaker 12: How can you hit someone then scream like you're the
Speaker 12: one who has been hit. Typical behavior from these bastards.
Speaker 12: In case you were wondering what US representatives had to
Speaker 12: say about the event, they all unsurprisingly joined in unison
Speaker 12: to show their support to Israel. I feel sorry for
Speaker 12: all Americans. Your government is occupied by the same force
Speaker 12: which occupies Palestine. These representatives are like literal bots, shelling
Speaker 12: out the same empty lines, displaying their worship of a
Speaker 12: foreign nation over their own right.
Speaker 1: The things that I've been saying that you know, maybe
Speaker 1: not have only hit. Maybe we've only hit the first
Speaker 1: couple of layers of the crust, didn't get didn't get
Speaker 1: down into the into the depths. Is it starting to
Speaker 1: make sense now that I'm not the only person saying
Speaker 1: that we're no different they have We're Israel before Israel
Speaker 1: was Israel? Is he not saying the same thing in
Speaker 1: different words?
Speaker 12: You British folk aren't left out of this death cult either?
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, because of the Bank of England came first Swasis.
Speaker 1: We've learned meet everybody in that country responsible for the debt,
Speaker 1: the interest for the loan he took to fight James.
Speaker 12: The second, Why is Britain intervening on behalf of a
Speaker 12: belligerent risking World war? How much does this intervention cost
Speaker 12: the taxpayer? Why is it never debated in Parliament? If
Speaker 12: Israel decided to attack Iran, why is Britain protecting Israel?
Speaker 12: Israel attacks a regional power during US nuclear negotiations, amidst
Speaker 12: the genocide on a captive population, bombing Yemen and Lebanon
Speaker 12: whilst occupying Syria, and they're still classed as the victims.
Speaker 1: Fuck these guys.
Speaker 12: Israel has been stoking a war with Iran since the nineties.
Speaker 12: They've constantly lied about Iran having nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1: I think it's funny how he's like his his his
Speaker 1: tempered changes. There. First thing he's like because he has
Speaker 1: his flat and then he's back to like talking calm.
Speaker 12: Just like they did with Iraq and their non existent
Speaker 12: weapons of mass destruction, all to provoke the US into
Speaker 12: an all out war with Iran. But America didn't take
Speaker 12: the bait, so Israel is now risking nuclear war in
Speaker 12: order to get what they've always wanted. Israel declares a
Speaker 12: state of emergency after striking Iran's capital.
Speaker 2: How can you hit.
Speaker 1: Someone then scream like you're the one who has been hit?
Speaker 12: Typical behavior from these bastards.
Speaker 1: It was nice to hear that, sway. Something happened with
Speaker 1: the stream? Where is this? What did you guys? Miss?
Speaker 1: There's seventeen people watching over and Rumble. That's awesome, all right,
Speaker 1: all right, I mean on Rumble on YouTube. That's a
Speaker 1: big that's big for us on YouTube. Hey, hey, I'll
Speaker 1: take it. Hold on, let me let me do the
Speaker 1: refresh on this as rumbled dead. No, it's interesting there.
Speaker 1: Ah yeah, I got to hit the refresh, but I'm
Speaker 1: not sure what happened there? Who do who do we
Speaker 1: get blipped off of? It wasn't It wasn't YouTube because
Speaker 1: you guys are on who are talking about it on Rumble.
Speaker 1: I don't even think anybody's talking on YouTube. I haven't
Speaker 1: seen any bays comments. Let me say, let me get
Speaker 1: over to that one. Sorry, sorry for taking time to
Speaker 1: do this. I just want to see what's up. So
Speaker 1: says we're good? So why has it says? Okay, oh,
Speaker 1: you know what the other ones are from? From uh
Speaker 1: X or Twitter. That's why we have seventeen Okay, cool,
Speaker 1: there's people actually paying attention on Twitter. That's that's nice.
Speaker 1: That's that's a first. Hey, alrighty good, let's see Ooops,
Speaker 1: I'm butting. Yeah, we're still on the same screen. Okay, good.
Speaker 9: Most Christian Zionis America have no idea that the people
Speaker 9: living in Israel are not the area of Palestine, Israel,
Speaker 9: whatever you want. They were not born there. They immigrated
Speaker 9: from Europe, Ashkenazi Jews. They were Ashkanazi Jews who came
Speaker 9: in from Europe and with the rifle took the land.
Speaker 8: God didn't give it to the They.
Speaker 1: Well bombs to come on, let's call all the if
Speaker 1: you're gonna, if you're gonna, you know, name one weapon
Speaker 1: emails on, name them all. Sure, there was freaking chemical
Speaker 1: weapons too, fox sake with these people took it at
Speaker 1: the point of or poisoning of whales of some sort of.
Speaker 9: Rifle shooting Arabs, and they killed Muslims and Christians.
Speaker 8: They slaughtered them.
Speaker 9: Massacres, women, children, horrible massacres. That is the history of his.
Speaker 1: Place, seven hundred and fifty thousand of them.
Speaker 9: Sure, terrorism Triel, nineteen forty eight. And I dare any
Speaker 9: Christian Zionists to prove me wrong, because I can show
Speaker 9: you the historical records of the massacres that took place
Speaker 9: in forty eight. It's horrible, absolutely horrible.
Speaker 8: The people who were killed.
Speaker 1: And before he continues, this is what even the pastors
Speaker 1: and the Christian churches are telling you. You need to
Speaker 1: support unquestioningly blindly because it's God's way and it said
Speaker 1: so somewhere in this Bible. Thinking no, it doesn't, and
Speaker 1: even if it does, then throw out that fucking book
Speaker 1: and burn it and piss on it because they Yeah, again,
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say this, the people who lie about
Speaker 1: everything else, I'm sure didn't lie at all when it
Speaker 1: came to writing their bullshit that they wanted everybody to follow.
Speaker 9: Yeah, and because of that the Arabs developed a fury
Speaker 9: and anger that European Ashkenazi's just flooded in to Palestine
Speaker 9: and violently pushed them off their land.
Speaker 1: So any wouldn't you be a little like, you know,
Speaker 1: suspicious if there was a book that came out of uh,
Speaker 1: you know, a region that said you have to protect
Speaker 1: the Irishmen at all costs, no matter what they do wrong,
Speaker 1: we'd be like, hmm, I wonder if irishman wrote this,
Speaker 1: you know, so why is it? Why is it so
Speaker 1: less absurd when it's them.
Speaker 9: Of us can understand that. But that was seventy years
Speaker 9: As a matter of fact, today is modern Israel's independence day?
Speaker 8: Is it?
Speaker 2: You know?
Speaker 5: Hamas?
Speaker 14: If you look at the history, you will find out
Speaker 14: that Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel because
Speaker 14: they wanted Hamas to counteract. Yes, Sir our Fat he said,
Speaker 14: we yeah, that was better then and served as purpose.
Speaker 14: But we didn't want Hamas to do this.
Speaker 1: So then uh yeah, you know how many plow Palestinian
Speaker 1: Liberation Organization? Well, first of all, our impression of that is, oh,
Speaker 1: they're all terrorists, we need to go reavel. You wait
Speaker 1: that from our childhood. First of all, and if you
Speaker 1: guys are older people, you understand what I mean. Like
Speaker 1: for us, it's probably in the eighties so in our childhood.
Speaker 1: But re evaluate all that and see if it's just
Speaker 1: the Western their media giving us that impression because people
Speaker 1: with turbans and beards look scary to us because it's
Speaker 1: foreign and different, or if they really to maybe have
Speaker 1: a good cause and reason, and of course there's always
Speaker 1: going to be bad actors that dress up like them
Speaker 1: to make them look bad, and you know, work on
Speaker 1: the optics and the public perspective perception so that everybody's categorize,
Speaker 1: oh you here, Muslim, you think terrorists. Meanwhile, the real
Speaker 1: terrorists are having a free for all, but they've massacred.
Speaker 1: And you know, they don't just kill one person or
Speaker 1: a couple people. They kill everybody within a vicinity of
Speaker 1: stretches of miles. Sometimes when they go after these PLO people,
Speaker 1: or did go after these PLO people. There's a huge
Speaker 1: list in that book. It's either the Golden or Final Judgment.
Speaker 1: I'm reading both them kind of back and forth, so
Speaker 1: I'm starting to get a little losses to which one
Speaker 1: is which. When I try to remember what pages that
Speaker 1: I was reading.
Speaker 14: We as Americans say, well, we have such a good system,
Speaker 14: We're going to impose this on the world. We're gonna
Speaker 14: invade Iraq and teach people how to be democrats. We
Speaker 14: want three elections, so we encourage the Palestinians to have
Speaker 14: a free election. They do and they elect Hamas. So
Speaker 14: we first indirectly and directly through Israel, helped establish Hamas.
Speaker 14: Then we have election that Hamas becomes dominant, so.
Speaker 1: We have to kill them.
Speaker 14: You know, it just doesn't make sense, you know, Hama.
Speaker 1: Especially since you know it did right there. Israel and
Speaker 1: America helped make Hamas Amas to the banking that funds
Speaker 1: everything else, and then as soon as they were substantial enough,
Speaker 1: they became the enemy because you can totally trust these people.
Speaker 1: Oh man, if only people would stop doing that. The
Speaker 1: timers stuck on one threes. But odd they were still alive.
Speaker 1: Really well, Rumble had a hiccup of that. That's weird. Well,
Speaker 1: go to YouTube. The link is in the description. Go
Speaker 1: to there, or go to the there's I'm on Twitter right
Speaker 1: now too. I still love that you can type in
Speaker 1: t W and get Twitter, get get even if it's
Speaker 1: called X. It's nice and if you're over on there,
Speaker 1: there's a little like love button there. There you go.
Speaker 1: Everybody likes to love button. Some some dudes can't find
Speaker 1: the love button. Don't be that dude. People talk. That's
Speaker 1: what I'm saying. Your secrets aren't secret. Okay, we are
Speaker 1: on page something or other when fourteen, he says, Like
Speaker 1: many whites at the time, Lincoln was in favor of
Speaker 1: colonizing blacks back to Africa. On August fourteenth, eighteen sixty two,
Speaker 1: Lincoln told a group of free black ministers visiting the
Speaker 1: White House that you and we are different races. We
Speaker 1: have between us a broader difference than exists between almost
Speaker 1: any other two races. Remember he's telling this a group
Speaker 1: of black ministers, and went on to advise them that
Speaker 1: his race suffers from your presence. The Great Man's paid
Speaker 1: in eighteen fifty sevens In an eighteen fifty seven speech
Speaker 1: addressing the Supreme Court's dread Scott decision, Lincoln declared, there
Speaker 1: is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all
Speaker 1: white people to the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation of the
Speaker 1: whites and black races, a separation of the races is
Speaker 1: the only perfect preventative of amalgamation. But as an immediate
Speaker 1: separation is impossible, the next Beck's thing is to keep
Speaker 1: them apart where they are not already together. If white
Speaker 1: and black people never get together in Kansas, there will
Speaker 1: never be mixed blood in Kansas. Even in his remember
Speaker 1: these are also coming from a guy who was the
Speaker 1: commander in chief of the Union soldiers who raped the
Speaker 1: shit out of all of the slave girls as they
Speaker 1: were doing their death march, their their murder march through
Speaker 1: the South. Even in his second Annual Message to Congress
Speaker 1: in eighteen sixty two, Lincoln said, I cannot make it
Speaker 1: better known that I that it. Sorry, I cannot make
Speaker 1: it better known than it already, is that I strongly
Speaker 1: favor colonization, meaning send them back. And you know, even
Speaker 1: though this is a good plot device for screwing up history,
Speaker 1: and you know, it could be they were able to
Speaker 1: write it to make it look like he was doing
Speaker 1: some great, wonderful thing. This could have even been what
Speaker 1: pissed off the Banks because a lot of the Jews
Speaker 1: are owned the slaves. Maybe this wasn't sanctioned by them, Lincoln,
Speaker 1: because it was only done to stir up chaos in
Speaker 1: the South. In the first place, Lincoln could have freed
Speaker 1: all the slaves in the North at any time. Instead,
Speaker 1: his Emancipation Emancipation Proclamation only freed slave only freed those
Speaker 1: within the confines of the seceded states, where he had
Speaker 1: no jurisdiction. Even Lincoln's loyal Secretary of State, William Seward,
Speaker 1: realized the absurdity here, acerbically remarking, we show our sympathy
Speaker 1: with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them
Speaker 1: and holding them in bondage where we can set them free.
Speaker 1: Lincoln's proclamation was a typically pragmatic political act, issued in
Speaker 1: response to the fact that both Great Britain and France
Speaker 1: were on the verge of recognizing the Confederacy. Remember we
Speaker 1: talked about this before Jefferson Davis approached them, and he
Speaker 1: wanted to be recognized as their own country, their own country,
Speaker 1: the South being their own country. The succeeded states their
Speaker 1: own country, united together as free states, meeting without slavery,
Speaker 1: and they had almost completely diminished it at that time,
Speaker 1: down to only four point eight percent of the population
Speaker 1: still owning them.
Speaker 5: Gee.
Speaker 1: I wonder who the holdouts were Lincoln freely admitted this, saying,
Speaker 1: I view the matter emancipation Proclamation as a practical war
Speaker 1: measure to be decided upon according to the advantages or
Speaker 1: disadvantages it may offer to the suppression of the rebellion.
Speaker 1: But yet we get a stupid history. Lincoln had long
Speaker 1: stress that his desire was to save the Union, which
Speaker 1: means crush people who thought they could leave. Whether that
Speaker 1: included freeing all of the slaves, some of the slaves,
Speaker 1: or none of the slaves, remember, that was just a tool.
Speaker 1: My paramount of object in the struggle is to save
Speaker 1: the Union. Oh sounds so noble when you say the
Speaker 1: word save, and but what you're saving it for international
Speaker 1: foreign bankers control, so that they can taxation tax everybody,
Speaker 1: and they'll have the jurisdiction to do so because it's
Speaker 1: under the federal government. Blah blahlah blah. And is not
Speaker 1: either to save or destroy slavery, Lincoln admitted it wasn't
Speaker 1: until the time of the proclamation that Lincoln talked about
Speaker 1: slavery as a root cause of the conflict. Was until
Speaker 1: then and his first inaugural address, Lincoln said, I have
Speaker 1: no purpose, directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution
Speaker 1: of slavery in the states where it exists. Hold On,
Speaker 1: before I finished what you said, how many of you
Speaker 1: thought that they succeeded in the first place because of
Speaker 1: being told that they couldn't have slaves. That's not what happened.
Speaker 1: The corruption, the horrific corruption of the federal aspects of
Speaker 1: the government, is what they stepped away from to have
Speaker 1: a more cleaner bill of rights, constitutional government of their own.
Speaker 1: That was followed, and they had their own money, they
Speaker 1: had everything else going for them. They were separate. But
Speaker 1: we're taught they jumped off the back of the dog
Speaker 1: that is America like flees it repulsed by the being
Speaker 1: told that they couldn't have slaves. And that's not what happened.
Speaker 1: They were already succeeded by then before let any of
Speaker 1: this and other talk and nonsense occurred. I have no
Speaker 1: purpose directly, okay, I said that part. I believe I
Speaker 1: have no lawful right to do so, and I have
Speaker 1: no inclination to do so. The word slavery didn't appear
Speaker 1: in Lincoln's first Annual Message, what is now called a
Speaker 1: State of Union address to Congress on September fifteenth, eighteen
Speaker 1: sixty two, Lincoln told a delegation from Chicago, what good
Speaker 1: would a proclamation of emancipation for me do? Would my
Speaker 1: word freeze the slaves when I cannot even enforce the
Speaker 1: Constitution in the rebel states? Unbelievably, just seven days later,
Speaker 1: Lincoln issued his initial proclamation, Remember rhetoric versus action, public
Speaker 1: optics action completely contradictory, and have absolutely as if one
Speaker 1: operates independently from the other. Let's see by his second
Speaker 1: Annual Message in December eighteen sixty two, shortly before passage
Speaker 1: of the Emancipation Proclamation on January first, eighteen sixty three,
Speaker 1: Lincoln was declaring that the rebellion couldn't have existed without slavery,
Speaker 1: and without slavery it could not continue. Mary Chestnut and
Speaker 1: her still marvelously sharp a diary from Dixie cogently remarked,
Speaker 1: the Yankees, since the war has begun, have discovered it
Speaker 1: is to free the slaves that they are fighting, So
Speaker 1: their cause is noble. Roll the eyes now. The Emancipation
Speaker 1: Proclamation of eighteen sixty two was hardly met with a
Speaker 1: universal approval in the North. A Chicago Times called it
Speaker 1: a monstrous usurpation a criminal wrong. Ohio's The Crisis editorialized,
Speaker 1: it is not a death blow, So I'm sorry. Is
Speaker 1: this not a death blow to the hope of union?
Speaker 1: Right if they really wanted to bring them back in
Speaker 1: without a fight. But the fight was part of it.
Speaker 1: The culling, the murder, the massive destruction was part of
Speaker 1: it because it wasn't about freeing slaves. It was about
Speaker 1: enslaving the rest of the country back under the federal control,
Speaker 1: which was a foreign control. We shall have a dictator, proclaimed,
Speaker 1: for the proclamation could never be carried out except under
Speaker 1: the iron rule of the worst kind of despotism. Lincoln's
Speaker 1: secretary spoke of all the angry letters sent to the president,
Speaker 1: some of them from outraged journalists. There was a common
Speaker 1: theme to the letters, where the writers stressed that they
Speaker 1: never gave him any authority to run it as an
Speaker 1: abolition war because of his executive action. Sounds like EO
Speaker 1: to me. One letter declared, he is a more unconstitutional
Speaker 1: tyrant and a more odious dictator than ever he was before,
Speaker 1: just saying that he was before too. A New York
Speaker 1: Herald reporter, an early precursor to those journalists embedded in
Speaker 1: more recent wars spoke of the dissatisfaction of the troops
Speaker 1: and the large promise of a fearful revolution. The midterm
Speaker 1: elections were a disaster for Lincoln and the Republicans, and
Speaker 1: the number of Democrats in Congress nearly doubled. There were
Speaker 1: thousands of soldiers who deserted from the Union ranks, and
Speaker 1: rumors that the proclamation could spark the secession of Northwest
Speaker 1: states like Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. You know, something just
Speaker 1: popped in my head and makes me wonder. Let me
Speaker 1: look something up real quick. I just want to be sure.
Speaker 1: What the hell? All right, Hold on one second, you
Speaker 1: guys over on rom Well. I have a weird feeling here.
Speaker 1: Let me double check here. Hopefully it's just server issues
Speaker 1: with them, but there could very well be another issue.
Speaker 1: So far, I still have a channel. What I That's
Speaker 1: not what I was thinking. Maybe they nuked me because
Speaker 1: or they pulled me offline, or thought that they did
Speaker 1: because of the content tonight. They don't call me a
Speaker 1: total line dan because I don't so Lincoln the warmonger,
Speaker 1: I mean simply to say that the war will cease
Speaker 1: on the part of the government whenever iShell have ceased
Speaker 1: on the part of those who began it. Abraham Lincoln
Speaker 1: eighteen sixty four Annual Message to Congress. That's a projection.
Speaker 1: Union stal warts like writer Rel Waldo Emerson were far
Speaker 1: more vicious and spiteful than the rebels. They'd condemned just
Speaker 1: about everybody that they prop up and celebrate our freaking
Speaker 1: scoundrels comebacks. Consider the following comments from Emerson, if it
Speaker 1: costs us ten years and tend to recover the general prosperity,
Speaker 1: the destruction of the South is worth so much you're
Speaker 1: talking about other Americans. Incidentally, the great grandfather of this
Speaker 1: noted liberal, Cornelius Waldo, was a slave merchant in Boston, Massachusetts.
Speaker 1: The Authors of the South was right report on the
Speaker 1: case of Union General Harry Truman, where when in the
Speaker 1: summer of eighteen sixty four, tried and found guilty of murder,
Speaker 1: arson and larceny and sentenced to be hanged murder, arson
Speaker 1: and larceny, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton ordered Truman really
Speaker 1: and returned to his old rank and status. The curious
Speaker 1: thing is not only the name, but the fact that
Speaker 1: this odious officer was located in northern Mersouri, same place.
Speaker 1: Given that the future US president shared his name and
Speaker 1: his locale, one wonders if they were related, and what
Speaker 1: did Truman do? It was a high ranking freemason. It
Speaker 1: was a real scumbag, another one working for the international bankers.
Speaker 1: And Zionism ruled. Zionism Yeah, and severely brutal to the
Speaker 1: Germans given to the future Oka. The authors say nothing
Speaker 1: about this, and I could find no documented connection. Another
Speaker 1: renowned writer, Nathaniel Hawthorne, wrote to his wife just after
Speaker 1: the shots were fired on Fort Sumter. Though I approve
Speaker 1: the war as much as any more of do I
Speaker 1: prove the war as much as any man. I don't
Speaker 1: quite understand what we are fighting for. It's educational to
Speaker 1: know that this kind of mindless patriotism is not a
Speaker 1: modern phenomenon, even among the most creative spirits. Yet another
Speaker 1: gifted writer, Boston poet and critic James Russell Lowell, wrote
Speaker 1: in a private letter, mister Lincoln seems to have the
Speaker 1: theory of carrying on the war without hurting the enemy.
Speaker 1: He is incapable of understanding that they ought to be hurt. Wow,
Speaker 1: such venom coming out of these people who don't have
Speaker 1: any real connection to reality because there were a bunch
Speaker 1: of aristocrats not living in the real world. Lincoln's inflexibility
Speaker 1: and unwillingness to negotiate a settlement was best revealed in
Speaker 1: an incident that occurred at the time of the Battle
Speaker 1: of Gettysburg. Honest Abe refused to permit Confederate Vice President
Speaker 1: Alexander Stevens and companion to pass through a Union blockade
Speaker 1: and enter Washington. Stevens and his fellow rebel had hoped
Speaker 1: to hold a conference, but Lincoln's telegram to the blockading
Speaker 1: admirals set it all. The request of A. H. Stevens
Speaker 1: is inadmissible. The customary agents and channels are adequate for
Speaker 1: all needful communication and conference between the United States forces
Speaker 1: and the insurgents. It is illuminating to quote from the
Speaker 1: letter Jefferson Davis sent to Stevens just before his trip,
Speaker 1: in which he stated, now remember Jefferson Davis as like
Speaker 1: the President of the Confederacy, right the last basheon of
Speaker 1: freedom in America, and when you take the slavery, you
Speaker 1: take that bullshit out of there. The true ideals of
Speaker 1: the of what America was founded, founded by and with
Speaker 1: only survived in the South at this point. My whole
Speaker 1: purpose is, in one word, to place this war on
Speaker 1: the footing of such that of such as are waged
Speaker 1: by civilized people in modern times, and to divest it
Speaker 1: of the savage character which has been impressed upon it
Speaker 1: by our enemies. In spite of all our efforts and protests,
Speaker 1: war is full, full enough of unavoidable horrors. Now again,
Speaker 1: they had the media back then propping people up with
Speaker 1: this ravenous war mongering attitude, which that's not the surprising part.
Speaker 1: What's surprising is that it worked between Americans versus Americans,
Speaker 1: that the country that came together to fight a revolution
Speaker 1: were so quick to forget. It is impossible to escape
Speaker 1: the notion when reading the respective words and thoughts of
Speaker 1: Confederate leaders and Union leaders that nowhere else in American
Speaker 1: history have the court historians affixed good and bad labels
Speaker 1: more dishonestly. Lincoln's essential strategy overall was to capitalize on
Speaker 1: a huge northern advantage in numbers two age, as noted previously,
Speaker 1: a war of Attrician This was the primary reason behind
Speaker 1: the schism between Lincoln and General George McLellan. McLellan, whom
Speaker 1: Lincoln derisively chided for having a case of the slowes,
Speaker 1: was loath to sacrifice his men in such a war
Speaker 1: of attrition. Right, they would let many Northern soldiers Union
Speaker 1: soldiers who were expendable die, because they had lots of them.
Speaker 1: As macillan wrote in a letter to the President, echoing
Speaker 1: the same theme as Jefferson Davis, this rebellion has assumed
Speaker 1: the character of a war. As such, it should be
Speaker 1: regarded and it should be conducted upon the highest principles
Speaker 1: known to Christian civilization. It should not be a war
Speaker 1: looking to the subjugation of the people of any state.
Speaker 1: In any event, it should not be at all a
Speaker 1: war upon population, but against enforces and political organizations. Neither
Speaker 1: confiscation of property, political executions of persons, territorial organization of states,
Speaker 1: or forcible abolition of slavery should be contemplated for a
Speaker 1: moment in prosecuting the war. All private property and unarmed
Speaker 1: persons should be strictly protected. That was McLellan on the
Speaker 1: north side, and that's who Lincoln didn't like. In light
Speaker 1: of what was to come later. Under the command of
Speaker 1: jo Uneruals like Sherman Grant and Sheridan This was quite noteworthy,
Speaker 1: quite a noteworthy observation, and revealed a tremendous contradiction in philosophies.
Speaker 1: General McClellan was slandered constantly behind the scenes, especially by
Speaker 1: Lincoln's young gay aids Gays with aids, John Hay and
Speaker 1: John Nicolay. In a letter to Nickolay, Hey wrote, the
Speaker 1: little Napoleon sits trembling before the handful of men at Yorktown,
Speaker 1: afraid either to fight or run. Stanton feels devilish about it.
Speaker 1: He would like to remove him if he thought it
Speaker 1: would do. Now they're talking about McLellan like the bold
Speaker 1: present day chickenhawks, who are so fond of sending others
Speaker 1: to war. Both Hay and Nickolay were among the favored
Speaker 1: few females, sorry, favored females of their generation who managed
Speaker 1: to avoid the tremendous back for the Union being waged
Speaker 1: by their social inferiors, social inferiors right aristocrats. He would
Speaker 1: leave over evidence of his animosity toward McClellan. In a
Speaker 1: letter not meant for publication, referring to the ten volume
Speaker 1: biography of Lincoln, he was writing about what a waste
Speaker 1: of time that was. He said of McLellan. I think
Speaker 1: I have left the impression of his mutinous imbecility, and
Speaker 1: I have done it in a perfectly courteous manner. It
Speaker 1: is of the utmost moment that we should seem fair
Speaker 1: to him while we are destroying him. That's awfully oyve
Speaker 1: of you to say. After the disastrous eighteen sixty two
Speaker 1: defeat in the Peninsula. In the Peninsula Campaign, McClellan pulled
Speaker 1: no punches in a letter to Washington. I again repeat
Speaker 1: that I am not responsible for this, and I say
Speaker 1: it with an earnestness of a general who feels in
Speaker 1: his heart the loss of every brave man who has
Speaker 1: been needlessly sacrificed. Today. I have seen too many dead
Speaker 1: and wounded comrades to feel otherwise if I save this army. Now,
Speaker 1: I tell you plainly that I owe no thanks to
Speaker 1: you or any other persons in Washington. You have done
Speaker 1: your best to sacrifice this army, so there was no
Speaker 1: good side to fight for because they didn't care about
Speaker 1: your life either. And that's the reality of the situation
Speaker 1: when it comes to these The more death, the better
Speaker 1: less people to have to manage. Afterward, mccleland's remarks were
Speaker 1: considered so inflammatory they were deleted by telegraph operators before
Speaker 1: being forwarded to Stanton and Lincoln. What the what the
Speaker 1: hell of the telegraph operators to do that? In contrast
Speaker 1: to low opinion those in Washington at the time held
Speaker 1: of him and his subsequent poor reputation among the establishment historians,
Speaker 1: Robert E. Lee was only one of the Federate leaders
Speaker 1: who rated McLellan as the best Union general he fought against.
Speaker 1: By all odds, I attempted to locate descendants of McLellan
Speaker 1: while writing this book. It is a testament to the
Speaker 1: fates of those who are on the wrong side of history,
Speaker 1: which is usually the right side of history. That essential facts,
Speaker 1: birth dates, names of children, etc. About his grandchildren aren't
Speaker 1: in the public record. So you know how people keep
Speaker 1: saying that they're like the on the right set of history.
Speaker 1: You can be on the right set of history, Like
Speaker 1: that's some condolence. Okay, well you're still part of that
Speaker 1: history because you're gone and everybody is going to have
Speaker 1: a different impression of you because of fucking Wikipedia, wiki pedophilia,
Speaker 1: saying that you're an anti this, and you're a racist
Speaker 1: that and all this other shit. Right, if you did
Speaker 1: anything good for the sake of mankind. If you stood
Speaker 1: up and just told the truth, ever, you will not
Speaker 1: be remembered well, you will just be another one of
Speaker 1: those enemies that everybody gets taught to hate. Look at
Speaker 1: some of the authors that we go over, so tell
Speaker 1: me what their Wikipedia says. Look at look at up
Speaker 1: William Cooper's, Look at uh, Eustace Mullens, look at any
Speaker 1: of those. Look at Ernest Sundel, look at uh, mister
Speaker 1: and mister Uh. You don't have to look too harches
Speaker 1: for that guy in Germany, do you. And we've already
Speaker 1: gone over Godafi wasn't anything that they said he was.
Speaker 1: We alady went over here, he goes Sha wasn't anything
Speaker 1: that they said he was. And I'm sorry to really
Speaker 1: really really see that Saddam wasn't anything that we thought
Speaker 1: he was. But there's always someone in that country that's
Speaker 1: being groomed for the position. The moment the tanks come
Speaker 1: rolling through in the on the bombs start falling to
Speaker 1: get rid of the guy that's there, and terrorformed that
Speaker 1: country from a nationalist country into a piece of shithole,
Speaker 1: piece of shit shithole. There we go. Establishment historians persistently
Speaker 1: promulgate the notion that honest abe unlike radical Republican cronies
Speaker 1: such as Daddy As Stevens, wanted to welcome the Confederate
Speaker 1: States back into the Union with open arms and a
Speaker 1: spirit of reconciliation. This is, however, contradicted by virtually every
Speaker 1: action Lincoln undertook as president, and his true beliefs were
Speaker 1: best expressed in his last annual Message to Congress, delivered
Speaker 1: in eighteen sixty four December. Besides a typical status reminder
Speaker 1: that taxation should be still further increased. Right, Why is that?
Speaker 1: Because they're providing a banking war and they're going in debt,
Speaker 1: and who's going to be responsible for the debt or
Speaker 1: at least its interest? Yeah, yeah, where do you think
Speaker 1: all the money is coming from?
Speaker 8: Yep.
Speaker 1: In a crass and tactless gesture, even for him, Lincoln
Speaker 1: seemed to downplay the mass losses of human life in
Speaker 1: his Noble War with a reference to the fact that
Speaker 1: we have more men now than we had when we
Speaker 1: began the war, that we are not exhausted nor in
Speaker 1: process of exhaustion, that we are gaining strength, and may,
Speaker 1: if need be maintained the contest indefinitely of any effort
Speaker 1: at negotiation. Lincoln said, it seems to me that no
Speaker 1: attempt at negotiation with an insurgent leader could result in
Speaker 1: any good. Even an ultra loyal Northern propaganda organ like
Speaker 1: Harper's Weekly categorize the speech as very unconsolatory, unconciliatory sorry
Speaker 1: in uh yes. In early eighteen sixty five, when the
Speaker 1: Confederacy was in its final waning days, Lincoln curtly replied
Speaker 1: to yet another attempt to engage him in negotiation by
Speaker 1: declaring that the three things were indispensable to peace. Number one,
Speaker 1: the restoration of the national authority throughout all the states
Speaker 1: meaning the federal government meaning the unionizing of all the states. Again,
Speaker 1: no receding by the Executive of the United States on
Speaker 1: the slavery question from the position assumes they're in. They're
Speaker 1: on in the late annual message to Congress and in
Speaker 1: preceding documents. And three, no cessation of hostilities short of
Speaker 1: an end of the war and the disbanding of all
Speaker 1: forces hostile to the government. The government, his government, his
Speaker 1: federal government. Dah fucking federalists right. In other words, there
Speaker 1: was to be absolutely no flexibility on Lincoln's part, states
Speaker 1: are just bitches right, and that's how we're at now,
Speaker 1: because that's who won. In a highly symbolic final gesture
Speaker 1: towards the defeated South, Lincoln and his son Tad on
Speaker 1: April fourth, eighteen sixty five, the boy's twelfth birthday, walked
Speaker 1: a mile or so through the burned out shell of Richmond, Virginia,
Speaker 1: the capital of the Confederacy. Lincoln must have felt giddy
Speaker 1: over all the Blacks he encountered, who literally went down
Speaker 1: on their knees before him, proclaiming him the savior. The
Speaker 1: Union troops yelled out three cheers for Uncle Abe. Then
Speaker 1: Lincoln strode into the Confederate White House, sat triumphantly in
Speaker 1: Jefferson Davis's chair, and put his feet up on the desk. Incredibly,
Speaker 1: this arrogant gesture of Lincoln's has been interpreted by mainstream
Speaker 1: douchebag historians as evidence of his humility, and his reckless
Speaker 1: visit certainly endangering the welfare of his son to Richmond,
Speaker 1: has been portrayed in a heroic light, where Lincoln boldly
Speaker 1: and bravely risked the wrath of any remaining rebels in
Speaker 1: the city. No historian appears willing to accept it for
Speaker 1: what it is. What it was, a victorious tyrant celebrating
Speaker 1: the defeat of a vanquished foe. Reports even persisted that
Speaker 1: the Great Emancipator, fresh from being hailed as a messiah
Speaker 1: by worshipful blacks, told a racist joke while seated in
Speaker 1: Davis's chair. My early views on the unsoundness of the
Speaker 1: Christian scheme of salvation and the human origin of the
Speaker 1: scriptures have become clearer and stronger with advancing years, and
Speaker 1: I see no reason for thinking I shall ever change them.
Speaker 1: Because he's a noife. Lincoln the atheist. Lincoln's closest friend,
Speaker 1: William Herndon, admitted that Lincoln was at times an atheist,
Speaker 1: just at times. He told someone who asked about Lincoln's
Speaker 1: religious beliefs that the less said on that subject, the better.
Speaker 1: Lincoln once said, the Bible is not my book, nor
Speaker 1: Christianity my profession. Lincoln attributed his thanksgiving this is to
Speaker 1: some of Seward's nonsense, and it pleases the fools. The
Speaker 1: words under God were not in Lincoln's Gettysburg address and
Speaker 1: were added later. Even his wife, Mary Todd Lincoln acknowledged
Speaker 1: that her husband, never joined any church and was not
Speaker 1: a technical Christian. Legend has it that Lincoln in his
Speaker 1: youth pended a rebuttal to the divinity of Christ. One
Speaker 1: of those who testified to this, Judge James M. Nelson,
Speaker 1: an intimate friend of Lincoln, said, so far as I
Speaker 1: have been able to find out, he remained an unbeliever.
Speaker 1: The New York New York World would admit a decade
Speaker 1: after his assassination that Lincoln was no disciple of Jesus
Speaker 1: Christ Jesus of Nazareth, that says he did not believe
Speaker 1: in his dividity. The newspaper, ever, anxious as all mainstream
Speaker 1: media was and still is, to perpetuate the heroic myth
Speaker 1: of Lincoln justified the partial concealment of his individual religious
Speaker 1: opinions because it was a conscientious and patriotic sacrifice of
Speaker 1: all oh yes, not his sacrifice sacrifice of the soldiers.
Speaker 1: According to a February hit teenth, nineteen ninety eight story
Speaker 1: in The New York Times, John T. Stewart, Lincoln's first
Speaker 1: law partner, claimed that he went further against Christian beliefs
Speaker 1: than any man I ever heard. Lincoln, of course, was
Speaker 1: free like anyone else to choose his religious beliefs, and
Speaker 1: this is mentioned only as an illustration of his political hypocrisy. Well,
Speaker 1: he seems to attacked Christianity and offload. Did he say
Speaker 1: anything bad about the ways? Hmm? Was he surrounded by them?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, more so? Or or pretty close to the
Speaker 1: way Trump is. One little pondered historical question is just
Speaker 1: why Lincoln went to a theater on Good Friday. I
Speaker 1: guess it meant more to matter, that that mattered more
Speaker 1: back then. Certainly he was no Catholic, but it But
Speaker 1: in those times the day was generally considered a somber,
Speaker 1: if not holy one. It's a holy one for me
Speaker 1: because I used to man, that was the last day
Speaker 1: of work for two days, and theaters were still or
Speaker 1: school uh. And theaters were still considered dens of vices,
Speaker 1: dens of vices. Theaters were considered the whorehouse of the
Speaker 1: old days. Too many Americans, even a typical worshipful journalist
Speaker 1: like George Alfred Townsend, would write the Chief made History
Speaker 1: of thirty million people, beloved, honored, revered, late in the
Speaker 1: pent up closet of a playhouse, dabbling with his sacred
Speaker 1: blood of the robes of an actress dabbling with his
Speaker 1: sacred blood the robes of an actress. John Wilkes, Booth's sister,
Speaker 1: despite coming from such a renowned acting family, remarked that
Speaker 1: it desecrated his idea to have his income in a
Speaker 1: devil's den a theater. That's really interesting. They call it
Speaker 1: a devil's den, missing the point entire I remember, these
Speaker 1: are live actors back then. When I'm talking about movie propaganda,
Speaker 1: there's still a propaganda missing the point entirely. Reliable Establishment
Speaker 1: historian Harold Holzer probably not German, probably not Russian, one
Speaker 1: of the most devote avout of Lincoln's disciples, attempted to
Speaker 1: impart religious significance to the fact that the assassination occurred
Speaker 1: on Good Friday. Olzer did share the interesting tidbit that
Speaker 1: Lincoln had received a suggestion from a bishop on in
Speaker 1: Rhode Island a few weeks before, reminding him that he
Speaker 1: ought to declare that day a day of fasting and mourning.
Speaker 1: He simply ignored it and went to the theater. One
Speaker 1: of Lincoln's most rational devotees, Robert g. Ingersoll, a leading
Speaker 1: politician and orator known as the Great Agnostic see Ingersoll,
Speaker 1: actually wrote the following about Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln was, in
Speaker 1: my judgment in many respects, the grandest man ever presidents
Speaker 1: of the United States, the greatest man ever president of the
Speaker 1: United States. Upon his monument, these words should be written.
Speaker 1: Here sleeps the only man in the history of the world, who,
Speaker 1: having been clothed with almost absolute power, never abused it,
Speaker 1: except upon the side of mercy. Think how long we
Speaker 1: clung to the institution of human slavery, how long lashes
Speaker 1: upon the naked back where legal tender for labor performed?
Speaker 1: Think of it? I told you to think of it?
Speaker 1: Are you thinking? With every drop of my blood? I
Speaker 1: hate and execate every form of tyranny, every form of slavery.
Speaker 1: I love liberty. Yeah, cops say that as they're pounding
Speaker 1: your head into the ground for not doing anything. Too.
Speaker 1: They say, I love freedom because to them, freedom is
Speaker 1: being able to beat the shit out of you without
Speaker 1: any repercussions. Presumably, the Great Agnostic loved the suspension of
Speaker 1: civil liberties and the mass arrests of those who disagreed
Speaker 1: with his hero's policies. Sounds like Trump fans he evidently
Speaker 1: didn't believe in, and the consent of the governed. It
Speaker 1: is hard to imagine a more inaccurate assessment of an
Speaker 1: individual than Ingersoll's home Ingersoll's homage to Lincoln. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: I gotta say this. If your country's overrun by parasites,
Speaker 1: let's just call him those and it is, and you
Speaker 1: have someone who has to override some bullshit in order
Speaker 1: to get rid of the foreign entity problem and isolate
Speaker 1: the you know, out of society to keep the rest
Speaker 1: of the people who are being infected by them prospering
Speaker 1: rather than being you know, forced into mother daughter prostitution
Speaker 1: in Berlin. Well, then I would say that guy, yeah,
Speaker 1: let's let's give him some concessions as to how he
Speaker 1: handles things, because he has to, because it's the system
Speaker 1: itself that's corrupted. Right, But when it comes to somebody
Speaker 1: who you're just who already has foreign interests, who represents
Speaker 1: that very parasitic entity in your country, you don't want
Speaker 1: to be raw raw rying that guy to take any
Speaker 1: liberties he wants away from the people. And you know,
Speaker 1: you can use liberty in the same way, like take
Speaker 1: liberties of overriding his his power, So both of those
Speaker 1: things at the same time, Right, you don't want you
Speaker 1: don't want that guy having carte blanche to do whatever
Speaker 1: the hell he wants because he's already working for the
Speaker 1: bad guy. So it's it's kind of like a case
Speaker 1: by case depending on the mentality and the the the
Speaker 1: intent of the person, because sometimes you have to do
Speaker 1: a cleanup. Other times you're just empowering the same psychotic, hateful,
Speaker 1: uh murderous entity that is killing your nation to have
Speaker 1: more power than it already has. And that's what we're
Speaker 1: in the situation with now, with everybody. Robi Ryan, Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I meant to say sorry. Happy birthday Donald Trump. Yeah,
Speaker 1: happy birthday Dad. My dad not same guy at all.
Speaker 1: My dad doesn't have an orange skin from for a
Speaker 1: seemingly religious septic skeptic, not septic, but probably the same
Speaker 1: for a re seemingly religious skeptic. To put it mildly,
Speaker 1: Lincoln invoked the name of the Almighty freely when it
Speaker 1: served his purposes. Yes, and so does everybody else, because there,
Speaker 1: like you said, it works for the fools, one clear transformation,
Speaker 1: because nobody ever argues against it as soon as you
Speaker 1: invoke the the Jesus or the Church or the one
Speaker 1: religion or another, depending on who your audience is at
Speaker 1: the time, you're just gonna get You're gonna get around
Speaker 1: to applause, and even the people who aren't quite convinced,
Speaker 1: they are gonna be like looking around them doing this.
Speaker 1: All right, I've watched that happen, and when I was
Speaker 1: reawakened to it, when they were indoctrining everybody in the
Speaker 1: Christian Zionism. One clear transformation we see in lincoln speeches,
Speaker 1: as analyzed so thoroughly, and when in the course of
Speaker 1: human events by Charles Adams in his attempt during the
Speaker 1: last period of Hiseny to shift the responsibility for the
Speaker 1: war onto God. God did it. God did it. There
Speaker 1: was an earlier fragment written by Lincoln in September eighteen
Speaker 1: sixty two, preserved by John Hey, remember the two Gays
Speaker 1: Nikolay and Hay, who nevertheless said it was not written
Speaker 1: to be seen of men. And when johnasdeb declared, I
Speaker 1: am almost ready to say that this is probably true,
Speaker 1: that God wills this contest. Yeah, they're God Saturn slash
Speaker 1: Corono slash Slatan, and wills that it shall not end.
Speaker 1: Yet by his mere great power on the minds of
Speaker 1: the now contestants. He could have either saved or destroyed
Speaker 1: the union without human contest. Yet the contest began as
Speaker 1: if it happened all by itself, not forced by them.
Speaker 1: They're always so I'm just dealing with the situation. Wasn't
Speaker 1: me making it happen? This is, you know, Thesi. The
Speaker 1: whole you know, luring Abala's slash sionis thing is to
Speaker 1: force things to happen. And then like I don't, I'm
Speaker 1: just stuck in the situation. Uh. And having begun, he
Speaker 1: could give the final victory to either side any day,
Speaker 1: Yet the contest proceeds. His second inaugural address really stressed
Speaker 1: this theme. He said, Yet, if God wills that it continue,
Speaker 1: until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty years of unrequited toils shall be sunk, and
Speaker 1: until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall
Speaker 1: be paid by another drawn with the sword. And was
Speaker 1: said three thousand years ago, as was said three thousand
Speaker 1: years ago, So still it must be said, the judgments
Speaker 1: of the Lord are true and righteous altogether. Well, it's
Speaker 1: funny that when he does quota, he quiss the Old Testament.
Speaker 1: Evidently the link in Lincoln's mind, it was God who
Speaker 1: held such a rigid stance against those who wanted to
Speaker 1: govern themselves. Yeah, yeah, yeah, refusing to negotiate and even
Speaker 1: refusing to accept the South humanitarian gesture. So remember we
Speaker 1: came over here for self determination, getting getting away from
Speaker 1: the Roman Catholic death trap empire, right, and and and
Speaker 1: the and British rule, which is, you know, intertwined with
Speaker 1: the same thing. And what did what did they want?
Speaker 1: What did they end up with? Anyway, the same type
Speaker 1: of thing where you didn't have the freedom to proceed
Speaker 1: through your life in it caused no harm common law manner. No,
Speaker 1: you had to have an overarching federal government that was
Speaker 1: taken way too much power and dictated small aspects of
Speaker 1: your life that they shouldn't never have been in. And
Speaker 1: Biggs pieces of shit said, well, you're not escaping it now.
Speaker 1: You thought you did for a little while, but not now.
Speaker 1: So what was seventeen eighty nine, ninety one right around there,
Speaker 1: we'll say to eighteen sixty five, that was the true
Speaker 1: life span of for America. Just because I kept the
Speaker 1: same name, it looks the same on the outside. Just
Speaker 1: all that means is that the the riding carcass that is,
Speaker 1: the host to this parasite still looks the same, but
Speaker 1: everything about how it operates is being manipulated by the
Speaker 1: parasite rigid Evently, in Lincoln's mind, it was a God
Speaker 1: who held such a rigid stance against those who wanted
Speaker 1: to govern themselves, refusing to negotiate and even refusing to
Speaker 1: accept the South's sanitarian gesture of releasing their prisoners of war.
Speaker 1: You didn't want them. And it was God who demanded
Speaker 1: that over half a million, mostly white lives be lost
Speaker 1: in a battle to free people that Lincoln himself didn't
Speaker 1: believe were his equals. Well, that makes total sense. None
Speaker 1: of it has to make sense. That's how it makes
Speaker 1: sense to get it Lincoln's true legacy. Nearly all men
Speaker 1: can stand adversity. But if you want to test a
Speaker 1: man's character, give him power. Well, that's hilarious for him
Speaker 1: to say. Acknowledging Abraham Lincoln for what he was did
Speaker 1: not always result in social and professional ostracization. Ostracizing right,
Speaker 1: I just think renowned author Edgar Lee Masters, in his
Speaker 1: long forgotten nineteen thirty one book Lincoln the Man, accurately
Speaker 1: noted that Audust Abe had crushed the principles of free government,
Speaker 1: crushed the principles of free government. When did When did
Speaker 1: the American ideals, the Founding father ideals, the thing that
Speaker 1: we think still exists because we're taught it in school.
Speaker 1: When did they end with this guy? Masters portrayed Lincoln
Speaker 1: as a tool of the bankers. It's not the first
Speaker 1: person who said that, And I've been telling and I've
Speaker 1: been saying that for six years, seven years now. Who
Speaker 1: wanted to establish a new bank of the United States?
Speaker 1: Masters summed up the beliefs, and they did, they did.
Speaker 1: Masters summed up the beliefs of many conspiracy theorists. When
Speaker 1: he wrote The Political Historic, The Political History of America
Speaker 1: has been written, for the most part by those who
Speaker 1: were unfriendly to the theory of a Confederated Republic. Masters
Speaker 1: brilliantly stated that Lincoln was to inaugurate a war without
Speaker 1: the American people having anything to say about it. Who
Speaker 1: who did the banking interests cogently recognizing, oh, I got
Speaker 1: turned my share hold on, cogently recognizing the awful precedent
Speaker 1: that Lincoln had established. Master's wrote the World War added
Speaker 1: to the proof for Wilson, did many things that Lincoln did,
Speaker 1: and with Lincoln as an authority for doing them. And
Speaker 1: remember we talked about this precedence is like the stupidest
Speaker 1: thing to go by, because it only takes one person
Speaker 1: to go off the rails and ignore his confines and
Speaker 1: draw outside the line, so that then everybody's drawing outside
Speaker 1: the lines and taking it a step further each time.
Speaker 1: Lincoln's overarching imperialistic actions have been used as a model
Speaker 1: by most of the presidents who followed him in office.
Speaker 1: More than any other historical figure. Abraham Lincoln is possible
Speaker 1: for the undue influence of executive power. The precedents was
Speaker 1: set in this time. Why am I going over it?
Speaker 1: Because this is why, and this is the death of
Speaker 1: America that we're discussing. This idea that we have of
Speaker 1: where we live is long gone. If it was a
Speaker 1: carcass not mummified, it would be dust and spiders. In
Speaker 1: nineteen thirty two, elderly Virginian Lyon Gardiner Tyler, son of
Speaker 1: President John Tyler, said of Lincoln, I think he was
Speaker 1: a bad man, a man who forced the country into
Speaker 1: unnecessary war and conducted it with great inhumanity. Tyler was
Speaker 1: one of a dying breed, perhaps the last of the
Speaker 1: anti Lincoln brigade who personally lived through Lincoln's tyranny. Do
Speaker 1: you know that they have an Abraham Lincoln brigade? And
Speaker 1: you know what they are? A bunch of fucking communist Marxists.
Speaker 1: So why do you think they have that name. It's
Speaker 1: almost it's almost an honest name, but you have to
Speaker 1: understand the true nature of Lincoln before you get it.
Speaker 1: Otherwise it's a stupid name because it's an inverted name
Speaker 1: based on the ivw ideals that you think are supposed
Speaker 1: to be flaunted with that name, right, And this is
Speaker 1: what makes everybody's head spin. It's like scrambled brain, eggenbrain.
Speaker 1: Where is it? Yeah? He was perhaps one of the
Speaker 1: last anti Lincoln gate who personally lived through Lincoln's tyranny.
Speaker 1: As Don E. Ferrenbacher wrote in The Anti Lincoln Tradition,
Speaker 1: the Confederate image of Abraham Lincoln in the eighteen sixties
Speaker 1: bears a striking resemblance to the American image of Adolf Hitler,
Speaker 1: which is also not fair. In the nineteen forties to
Speaker 1: consider who's filters, you're looking at the rest of the
Speaker 1: world through they've already won here. They didn't tell you
Speaker 1: that they won. So you think that anything that's being
Speaker 1: coming off of the media is just then trying to
Speaker 1: inform you of what's going on in the world. And
Speaker 1: then you see it through their view, and what do
Speaker 1: you know, You have the same impression and the same
Speaker 1: animosity for figures as do the enemy that hates you,
Speaker 1: because you're looking through their eyes at the world, because
Speaker 1: they're putting their glasses on you when they're putting it
Speaker 1: through their media, they're putting their filters on it. And
Speaker 1: then you think of a guy who's a fucking hero
Speaker 1: as a psychopath and a dictator, and like that's absolutely
Speaker 1: inverted and completely unfair, and that's what happens. And then
Speaker 1: we have false impression in the world, and we're always
Speaker 1: killing the people that could, you know, liberate us and
Speaker 1: cheering it on while we're being tighter and tighter, shackles
Speaker 1: around our wrists and hands, wristen feet, whatever. It is
Speaker 1: sobering to consider how Lincoln would be viewed historically if
Speaker 1: the South had won the War between the States. As
Speaker 1: we should always remember, history is written by the victors,
Speaker 1: which your vector victor. When Lincoln attained the status of
Speaker 1: a secular saint, a veritable father Abraham. Remember Abrahamic religion's
Speaker 1: Abrahamic death cults saturn cult throughout much of America. Following
Speaker 1: his assassination, the South remembered him differently and was in
Speaker 1: a celebratory mood. Right. The people who were murdered had
Speaker 1: their families raped, sometimes murdered as well. Everything's stolen from them,
Speaker 1: their crops burned, their their fields salted, their their homes,
Speaker 1: nothing but a chimney left, and all their livestock either
Speaker 1: killed or taken away to be eaten by the soldiers
Speaker 1: while they starved to death. Yeah, yeah, yeah, And that's
Speaker 1: not even talking about reconstruction yet. Wait till we get there.
Speaker 1: The world is a happily rid of a monster that
Speaker 1: disgraced the form of humanity. Now that sounds exactly like
Speaker 1: an away disgracing the form of humanity, crowed the Texas Republican.
Speaker 1: Some Northerners celebrated too. An unfortunate man in swamp Scott, Massachusetts,
Speaker 1: who rejoiced over Lincoln's assassination was tarred and feathered. Psycho
Speaker 1: stupid Bob their common retard doing stupid things to people
Speaker 1: who should be happy and they should have been too.
Speaker 1: A man in the story of New York was heard
Speaker 1: celebrating the assassination and was strung up as long as
Speaker 1: was safe without utter strangulation. The editor, Yeah, any idea
Speaker 1: of any charges brought against these people who did that
Speaker 1: to this guy? Probably not. The editor of this Seattle
Speaker 1: Weekly Gazette wrote, there are about two dozen of the
Speaker 1: same sort in this vicinity who deserved the same treatment. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's your media saying that they string a guy up
Speaker 1: for being happy about what happened and nearly kill him.
Speaker 1: This in the Seattle Gazette says there's at least two
Speaker 1: dozen more of the same sort in the city who
Speaker 1: deserve the same treatment, except they want to not be
Speaker 1: taken down so soon. So kill them, is what they're saying.
Speaker 1: And that's a fucking media outlet saying that. Is that
Speaker 1: not enticing or inciting violence? Is that what that is?
Speaker 1: Isn't that a crime? There's the only crime when you're
Speaker 1: not on the side of the you know, the control system,
Speaker 1: when you're not saying things are favorable to it. Even
Speaker 1: fellow Republican Senator Benjamin Wade regarded Lincoln's assassination as a
Speaker 1: political Blessing. Marcus M. Pomeroy, editor of the small Wisconsin paper,
Speaker 1: had declared on the eve of eighteen sixty four election.
Speaker 1: Of the eighteen sixty four election, the man who votes
Speaker 1: for Lincoln now is a traitor and murderer. And if
Speaker 1: he is elected to miss governed for another four years,
Speaker 1: we trust some bold hand will pierce his heart with
Speaker 1: dagger point for the public good. I like it when
Speaker 1: we celebrate Abraham Lincoln. What are we celebrating? I've I've
Speaker 1: read this part before, and it was six years ago,
Speaker 1: and I just I got that dijavu feeling. When we
Speaker 1: we celebrate Abraham Lincoln? What are we celebrating? A man
Speaker 1: who relentlessly pushed an international conflict that eventually claims over
Speaker 1: six hundred and twenty thousand lives, more than the losses,
Speaker 1: more than the losses Americans have suffered and nearly all
Speaker 1: other wars combined. A leader who imprisons an unknown number
Speaker 1: of citizens at least forty thousand without charges for simply
Speaker 1: opposing his policies. A crafty politician, remember that could come
Speaker 1: back to haunt us again too. A crafty politician who
Speaker 1: converted the public rationale for the war halfway through the
Speaker 1: conflict into a struggle against slavery halfway through the conflict. Well,
Speaker 1: he personally harbored white supremacist views. I don't whatever that means.
Speaker 1: He a supposedly spiritual savior who was in actuality Probably
Speaker 1: an atheist again, I don't care about that part. Who
Speaker 1: never I'm not an atheist. I believe in a bit
Speaker 1: of a creator. But all those stupid books that really
Speaker 1: follows that makes in the public mind, you're an atheist
Speaker 1: if you don't believe this book that I got men wrote. Well,
Speaker 1: fuck your book that men wrote, especially those men with
Speaker 1: the look noses in the fucking children in their basements. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm not into that. Uh let's see. Yeah. Probably an
Speaker 1: atheist who, nevertheless, late in the war overtly attempted to
Speaker 1: attribute all the bloodshed to the will of God. A
Speaker 1: politician who bethrowed betrothed to big bankers that he once
Speaker 1: jumped I said, did I say that right? Two big
Speaker 1: bankers so betrothed, Yeah, okay, to betroth to the bake
Speaker 1: bankers that he once jumped from the second floor window
Speaker 1: during a hearing of the Illinois House of Representatives in
Speaker 1: order to break a quorum when Democrats had called for
Speaker 1: a vote to crip hold a state bank. Isn't that interesting?
Speaker 1: Jumped out of two flory window. He's tall, though, so
Speaker 1: he lented around me. A man who didn't attend his
Speaker 1: own father's funeral. Upon being informed of his father's declining health,
Speaker 1: Lincoln refused to visit him and asked the step brother
Speaker 1: to say to him that if we could meet now,
Speaker 1: it is doubtful whether it would not be more painful
Speaker 1: than pleasant. Sounds like there's a little abuse going on there,
Speaker 1: and it could have been a Francis for all we
Speaker 1: fucking now, what does it say about us as a
Speaker 1: people or about the civilization we've created that this tyrannical leader,
Speaker 1: with more blood on his hands than any other ever
Speaker 1: elected to the office of the presidency is considered the
Speaker 1: crown jewel of our nation nation's history. Yeah right, Why
Speaker 1: tyrannical leader with more blood on his hands than any
Speaker 1: other ever elected to the office of the presidency. He's
Speaker 1: a crown jewel, and Trump wants to beat it. He
Speaker 1: wants to be number one. In the nineteen forty nine
Speaker 1: essay Future John F. Kennedy, historian Arthur M. Schleisinger Slushinger
Speaker 1: Junior expressed the conventional view that the Civil War was
Speaker 1: an unavoidable and necessary conflict, although along with World War Two,
Speaker 1: the Civil War is almost universally considered now to have
Speaker 1: been a good war, one that only racists, perhaps even
Speaker 1: aspiring slave masters, could have opposed. And he's a Slushinger.
Speaker 1: What did I tell you what he is? In Slushinger's words,
Speaker 1: there are simply times when a society works itself into
Speaker 1: a log jam, and that log jam must be burst
Speaker 1: by violence. Gookoo juxtapposed against sounds like he's talking about,
Speaker 1: like bathroom problems to the whole logjam thing. Juxtapposed against
Speaker 1: Schlessinger's simplistic perspective. The staggering numbers from Lincoln's bloody war
Speaker 1: boggle the mind. The total deaths from the war, adjusting
Speaker 1: for today numbers, would be about six million. Oh, there's
Speaker 1: that number Americans lost, or two percent of the entire population.
Speaker 1: There were twenty three thousand casualties during the one day
Speaker 1: Battle of the Antietam alone, and fifty one thousand and
Speaker 1: fifty one thousand casualties at Gettysburg. As H. L. Mencken
Speaker 1: put it in honesty. I'm sorry and honestly dissecting Lincoln's
Speaker 1: Gettysburg address, But let us not forget that it is poetry,
Speaker 1: not logic, beauty not sense. It's poetry not logic, beauty
Speaker 1: not sense. Think of the argument in it. The doctrine
Speaker 1: is simply this that the Union soldiers who died at
Speaker 1: Gettysburg sacrificed their lives to the cause of self determination. Right,
Speaker 1: It wasn't about slavery. They all were killing each other
Speaker 1: because they wanted to be left alone and live a
Speaker 1: cause no determine their own lives. That's what self determination means.
Speaker 1: You can't have that in a despotism. You can't just
Speaker 1: be free to pursue your life and enjoy your family
Speaker 1: and be left alone. That's what the fucking order was about.
Speaker 1: That's how much they're vehemilarly against that. And what did
Speaker 1: they do when we were talking about this, what did
Speaker 1: they target a lot fucking farms, farmers to assault of
Speaker 1: the goddamn earth. Well, they would sault your fields. Then
Speaker 1: how about that that government of the people, by the people,
Speaker 1: for the people should not perish from the earth? Right,
Speaker 1: So contradiction, because all that stuff is what they think
Speaker 1: they're fighting for and it's not, it's they're fighting against it.
Speaker 1: It is difficult to imagine anything more untrue. The Union
Speaker 1: soldiers in that battle actually fought against self determination. It
Speaker 1: was the Confederates who fought for the right of their
Speaker 1: people to govern themselves. The decidedly leftist menkan on to
Speaker 1: note what was the practical effect of the Battle of
Speaker 1: the Gettysburg? What else, then, the destruction of the old
Speaker 1: sovereignty of the states, ie of the people of the states.
Speaker 1: Demonstrating how honest liberals once viewed reconstruction, Menken declared, the
Speaker 1: Confederates went into battle freely. They came out with their
Speaker 1: freedom subject to the supervision and veto of the rest
Speaker 1: of the country. And for nearly twenty years that veto
Speaker 1: was so effective that they enjoyed scarcely more liberty in
Speaker 1: the political sense than so many convicts in the penitentiary
Speaker 1: open air prison panopticon. And that misleading speech is considered
Speaker 1: the greatest in American history by establishment scholars. Mencn summed
Speaker 1: up the war thusly. The American people north and South
Speaker 1: went into the war as citizens of their respective states.
Speaker 1: They came out as subjects slaves of the United states,
Speaker 1: and what they lost they had never gotten back. So
Speaker 1: what does that tell you that was the death of America.
Speaker 1: Northern abolitionist LYSANDERUS Spooner echoed this theme. The principle on
Speaker 1: which the war was waged by the North was simply this,
Speaker 1: that men may rightfully be compelled to submit to and
Speaker 1: support a government that they do not want, and that
Speaker 1: resistance on their part makes them traitors and criminals. No
Speaker 1: principle that is possible to be named can be more
Speaker 1: self evidently false than this, or more self evidently fatal
Speaker 1: to all political freedom. Yet it triumphed in the field,
Speaker 1: and is now assumed to be established. If it really
Speaker 1: be established. The number of slaves, instead of having been
Speaker 1: diminished by the war, has been greatly increased. For a
Speaker 1: man thus subjected to a government that he does not want,
Speaker 1: is a slave. And there is no difference in principle,
Speaker 1: but only in degree, between political and chattel slavery. The former,
Speaker 1: no less than the latter, denies a man's ownership of
Speaker 1: himself and the products of his labor, and asserts that
Speaker 1: other men may own him and dispose of him and
Speaker 1: his property for their uses at any time at their pleasure.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, Oh my god, there's still a lot left.
Speaker 1: I want to get the reconstruction. Whens that pages. I
Speaker 1: would say, we still, well, let's see what page is at.
Speaker 1: I don't want to click it because then just tell
Speaker 1: me the number on the thing. Oh I and I
Speaker 1: changed it pictures. Where was I at the goddamn it?
Speaker 1: Let me just sayd that one? All right, we'll pick
Speaker 1: it up here. Some of the time. My daughter's doing
Speaker 1: a Jennetta uh not jenatica. She's uh kind of steep
Speaker 1: over tonight, So I don't have to I might have
Speaker 1: I might have the computer earlier in the morning tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Maybe I'll do this a little bit earlier. That we
Speaker 1: don't freaking we don't need him to do that. He's
Speaker 1: not that's not that's not a fucking public service. He's
Speaker 1: a fucking he's destroying the country, and he's a fucking
Speaker 1: jew loving motherfucker who's pushing the banks into a greater
Speaker 1: uh grip around our throats, along with installing their digital
Speaker 1: cheka in the process. Yeah, and I don't know if
Speaker 1: there has to be Yeah, I was up twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: They said so, And that has nothing to do with this.
Speaker 1: His family lineage, but apparently he had converted into Shabbad,
Speaker 1: which is like the straight up frankest uh outcropping like
Speaker 1: that's that's that's the right up in there with the
Speaker 1: child harming bagels. What's up, doctor Evils, how you doing?
Speaker 1: But yeah, that's that's. That's inconsequential to the fact that
Speaker 1: it's it's on record that he has converted. Regardless you
Speaker 1: Jew was a religion, I don't give a fuck what
Speaker 1: anybody said about it, Like all you're like, you're not
Speaker 1: half You're not half Catholic on your mother's side, So
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter what they tell you about Lene's because
Speaker 1: it's not ethnicity. That's that's that's playing into their bullshit, right,
Speaker 1: because it's hiding for something else. It's not jew that
Speaker 1: they are. It's Ashkenazi. Potentially it could be like from
Speaker 1: that region of the world, but it's not Jew because
Speaker 1: then then Jew doesn't mean Judaism anymore, I mean something else.
Speaker 1: So right, all right, I'm just looking to see if
Speaker 1: there's anything else. I think we're good. We've been on
Speaker 1: to justin long. All right, let's just do this real quick.
Speaker 1: Here's my boy at where does it go?
Speaker 5: There?
Speaker 1: He is it did, all right. Now, I just got
Speaker 1: to show you this.
Speaker 13: Not that.
Speaker 1: Cool?
Speaker 5: All right?
Speaker 1: Scroll down if you're on Rubble. If you're not, then
Speaker 1: we don't do that. Click the show more button if
Speaker 1: you need to. You'll see my website right there. You'll
Speaker 1: see the Patreon and the gifts and go. This is
Speaker 1: how the thing keeps rolling now, Instagram, doctor j Lynnen kIPS.
Speaker 1: All these things are things you should be following. It's
Speaker 1: pretty on the rumble, the YouTube, to TikTok, to the Instagram. Okay,
Speaker 1: but Patreon. That's how the show rolls. And so does
Speaker 1: getting hot sauce from me. Okay, I'm gonna be leaving July,
Speaker 1: and now I'm not gonna tell you when, but July ninth,
Speaker 1: to give or take uh, and I won't be back
Speaker 1: for quite a while. I'll be doing shows from New
Speaker 1: York probably most likely probably have to at least you're
Speaker 1: the doctor, glennam Ones, but I'll probably doing more. I
Speaker 1: was gonna say, so get your orders in now so
Speaker 1: that I don't you know, you're not waiting around till
Speaker 1: I get back, because I'm gonna be gone for like
Speaker 1: eighteen days. Okay, all right, good center Fry LC dot com.
Speaker 1: You click it, you can go right from there. So
Speaker 1: one Stop Shop is a coupon code for ten percent off,
Speaker 1: and you get oh, by the way, Daisy right there,
Speaker 1: and then you get this thing. You just hit the
Speaker 1: little copy button your copy. Then you can scroll around
Speaker 1: and look at her lixers and that's right there. And
Speaker 1: then my book th eighteen Hot Sauce by the gallon
Speaker 1: Hot Sauce in twelve eight and twelve PACs twelve six
Speaker 1: ounce bottles or twelve twelve once bottles. And then you
Speaker 1: can get this by the singles, and the singles are
Speaker 1: where you get your just come from for the coupon code.
Speaker 1: All right, man, And there these are the two hottest.
Speaker 1: All of them are awesome. Venom is awesome, Humsinger is awesome,
Speaker 1: Avocado and It is awesome. One Picks Fight is awesome,
Speaker 1: Whipper Snapper is awesome. There were just you just gonna
Speaker 1: love them. So just there you go, all right, And
Speaker 1: if you don't want that, then you should go to
Speaker 1: get doctor Lynn's membership and you should do both. Use
Speaker 1: my cub on code for fifty percent off. And if
Speaker 1: you're looking to get in on the monthly and he
Speaker 1: takes it away. I have been warning you. I've been
Speaker 1: warning you to get it so that your grandfather did
Speaker 1: in so that you don't have to. You know, it's
Speaker 1: an annual fee or it's a monthly fee. Right, you're
Speaker 1: gonna say one hundred and twenty bucks more a month
Speaker 1: if you do it, I mean a year if you'd yeah,
Speaker 1: a year if you do with the annual. But some
Speaker 1: people don't want that surprise because they forget about it
Speaker 1: and the year comes by and then they get to
Speaker 1: the auto renewal. So if you don't, if you're concerned
Speaker 1: about that, and you want to do the monthly, you
Speaker 1: still at the fifty percent off, but it's at thirty
Speaker 1: bucks a month rather than twenty. So and that's the
Speaker 1: wrong one, son. There we are, is is this the one? Yes?
Speaker 8: It is?
Speaker 1: Okay, cool. That's what everybody should be doing on the
Speaker 1: way out, is clicking that bud. So we'll run here,
Speaker 1: you see the same basically the same thing, right, and
Speaker 1: then the patreons right here boom, And I'm gonna put
Speaker 1: some new stuff up on there too, and I also
Speaker 1: do a little uh little blog posts there too, And
Speaker 1: I was gonna go over or let you guys watch,
Speaker 1: but it's kind of a moot point now because you know,
Speaker 1: nothing happened today, so the thing that what's his name
Speaker 1: talked about, Ken Wheeler isn't isn't really as relevant as
Speaker 1: was before. So it's certainly worth the time. And there
Speaker 1: was a last thing I gotta get up soon. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so you got that, and then you have to get
Speaker 1: set go right there, boom, one timer, throw the one
Speaker 1: timer in with the show, all right, just give some
Speaker 1: go dot com back, So sorry, forward slash ball Busters.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for your support. Priciphilopagus says, thank
Speaker 1: you as well. Come Onis, Briciphilus, take it away. He's
Speaker 1: doing a jake. Do we need some music for this guy?
Speaker 13: No?
Speaker 1: Then I know anything really good right now, and then
Speaker 1: it will become an all the clip if I don't
Speaker 1: put it through the through the stream yard. So we'll
Speaker 1: go with that some other time. Thank you, bricell Pholopicus.
Speaker 1: You may retire. There we go, do you guys later.
Speaker 1: Thank you,