Speaker 1: You see somethings are going to happen.
Speaker 2: What what's going to happen?
Speaker 3: He'll take you.
Speaker 4: What a.
Speaker 2: Help you Welcome to the Occult Rejects.
Speaker 5: This episode we got myself and we got the Headless Giant,
Speaker 5: and we got Ricardo from the Institute for Natural Philosophy
Speaker 5: with us again today. Uh, before we get this show started.
Speaker 5: For all the new listeners out there, Headless, why don't
Speaker 5: you plug your you know, plug your stuff and let
Speaker 5: everybody know what do you deal with.
Speaker 1: I'm the Headless Giant. You can find me on YouTube.
Speaker 1: If you have a paranormal slash magical stories, slash dream
Speaker 1: you can send it to Headless Giant Podcast at gmail
Speaker 1: dot com and we will read it on Thursdays, So
Speaker 1: check that out.
Speaker 5: Awesome, Yes, definitely sending those emails. And Ricardo my man.
Speaker 5: Thank you so much for coming back on. Always love
Speaker 5: chatting with you. Please let everybody know what your dealer
Speaker 5: where they can find all your man.
Speaker 4: Sure, absolutely, thank you very much for having me again.
Speaker 4: It's a pleasure to be here. So basically, I'm a
Speaker 4: multi disciplinary researcher with many years trying to figure out
Speaker 4: the mysteries of life and existence. So it's nothing too complicated.
Speaker 4: And what I've kept forgetting every time I come to
Speaker 4: your show is to say that I do have two
Speaker 4: books out there, one about consciousness and science and how
Speaker 4: it relates determinism, free will, all that kind of material
Speaker 4: that it's called Stardust that you can find on my
Speaker 4: ex page or in the Amazon and the Ricardo Value.
Speaker 4: And I have one exclusively dedicated to Tillery energies and
Speaker 4: how these ancient megalytic sites were functionalized, all based in science.
Speaker 1: There is no wu wu there.
Speaker 4: Everything that I wrote is there on the appendices, and
Speaker 4: there's many papers backing it up. When it's speculation, I
Speaker 4: will state there is speculation. So that one is called
Speaker 4: The Resonance Earth Resonance Earth. So it's also on Amazon
Speaker 4: under ricat cal Value, or you can find me on
Speaker 4: x at rikat Calvary one. Thank you for allowing me
Speaker 4: to do this, because I keep forgetting that that I
Speaker 4: have the books.
Speaker 5: Well, I did say next time after this, when you
Speaker 5: come on, I would really like you to come on
Speaker 5: to cover one of your books so people hear about
Speaker 5: it eventually from us.
Speaker 2: Thank you again Ricardo for coming on. I always like it.
Speaker 5: Again, I always appreciate you coming on and talking with
Speaker 5: us and you know, headless, thank you for making you know,
Speaker 5: for joining with us as well.
Speaker 2: You know, there was a few things.
Speaker 5: I figured we could, you know, chat about bullshit about,
Speaker 5: you know, some things that I had and idea was
Speaker 5: to talk about what was going on over there by you.
Speaker 5: Paul shifts all all sorts of things. I know Hella
Speaker 5: said he had a few things that he might have
Speaker 5: wanted to toss around, but.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 5: I guess maybe will start off like, well, what do
Speaker 5: you think was going on with over by you with
Speaker 5: all that power outage and everything. I know, I know
Speaker 5: you were looking at it a so okay.
Speaker 4: So again this is purely speculative, although based on what
Speaker 4: I think I know, no, so this is my perspective.
Speaker 4: I think those that's seen the first minute or first
Speaker 4: minute and a half of the day after tomorrow, we'll
Speaker 4: understand what I'm talking about. So this is the scene
Speaker 4: that they use in the movie to show their idea
Speaker 4: of how a mammot could be instantly frozen with the
Speaker 4: food still fresh in his stomach, which we cannot do
Speaker 4: with fridges. So how was it possible for the mammoth
Speaker 4: be instantly freezed and when we don't have an explanation
Speaker 4: for that. So I associated that. I took all the
Speaker 4: clouds that are there, and the conduction of the space
Speaker 4: temperature into the Earth. I took all of that, and
Speaker 4: I use what I saw in spaceweather News on YouTube.
Speaker 4: This guy band that I followed for many years, and
Speaker 4: he knows this stuff, and it's showing these graphics that
Speaker 4: to show that there is in the magnetic field. At
Speaker 4: the time of the blackout, there was a massive high
Speaker 4: pressure and a massive low pressure in terms of geomagnetic field.
Speaker 4: So the positive was interacting with the negative and they
Speaker 4: were meeting exactly where above the Pyrenees the cables caught fire. Now,
Speaker 4: the French government came immediately after one hour or so
Speaker 4: saying no file, We had no file whatsoever, but the
Speaker 4: fact that it was seen and they can't figure it
Speaker 4: out what happened because they cannot tell people that fifteen
Speaker 4: gigherts of electricity that is the equivalent of seventy percent
Speaker 4: of the consumption for a day in Spain. So this
Speaker 4: includes the industry, this includes everything, Okay, So it's a
Speaker 4: gigantic amount of electricity that disappeared in less than a second,
Speaker 4: because the second is the smallest measure of time that
Speaker 4: the machines can do. In less than a second, it
Speaker 4: disappeared fifteen gigherds of energy that no one knows where
Speaker 4: it went. Well, if we see the fire in the cables,
Speaker 4: you see the two high low pressures above the place,
Speaker 4: and you see this opening in the weakening magnetic field,
Speaker 4: I would say that it sucked fifteen gigahords of power
Speaker 4: into space or into the atmosphere or wherever it was
Speaker 4: sucked from the cables because of the stagnation. Now where
Speaker 4: does the stagnation come from? They are using from sixty
Speaker 4: to seventy percent of solar powered and in mill electricity.
Speaker 4: And what they found out with this kind of blackouts
Speaker 4: is that while turbines give torqu those that understand cars
Speaker 4: and engines will understand this.
Speaker 1: There is power and there is torque.
Speaker 4: These turbines give torque to the power so it doesn't
Speaker 4: lose momentum going through these grids. And because the grids
Speaker 4: are all connected now we are no longer independent. So
Speaker 4: Portugal is connected to Spain. Spain is connected to France
Speaker 4: by Enderwater cable and by the Pyrenees high tension cables
Speaker 4: where this happened. So because there is no torque in
Speaker 4: the power the electricity, they this is hard to explain
Speaker 4: and I don't fully understand it, but it gets stagnated
Speaker 4: in the in the cables. It doesn't it's not going
Speaker 4: as it should. So by taking this tagnation, we the
Speaker 4: phenomenon in the atmosphere, we the weakening magnetic field. With
Speaker 4: the fact that all the machines shut down immediately because
Speaker 4: they saw.
Speaker 1: What the heck is going on?
Speaker 4: Fifteen years of energy in one second, Let's shut this
Speaker 4: whole thing down because something very serious is going on.
Speaker 1: There's a central in fire. There must be a serious mistake.
Speaker 4: And so this TL seven seventy to two hundred or whatever,
Speaker 4: that these machines that are controlling the stations all at
Speaker 4: the same time decided that something very very serious was
Speaker 4: going on and they all shut down the power. There
Speaker 4: was no one shutting down the power. It was automatic.
Speaker 4: It was a measure of precaution. In fact, that why
Speaker 4: they said to us that it will take seventy two
Speaker 4: hours to bring the power up when they didn't know
Speaker 4: what's going on. And after nine hours they managed to
Speaker 4: do it in the whole territory. So now this is
Speaker 4: leads us to another topic, that is, I knew that
Speaker 4: people will because CIA and other agencies that did ask
Speaker 4: for psychologists and therapists to tell them how much time
Speaker 4: would take for a population to start chaos in the
Speaker 4: absence of lights and water, when there's the absence of food,
Speaker 4: and they ask for them to do okay, but I
Speaker 4: need to know how much time there will be food
Speaker 4: on the shelves. And they told them that supermarkets could
Speaker 4: last a maximum of three days. So it was established
Speaker 4: that chaos, crime, breaking windows, neighbour attacking neighbor would start
Speaker 4: off with a period of three days without electricity, water,
Speaker 4: access to fuel, communications, whatever the thing is. It didn't
Speaker 4: happen after three days. It was happening here after the
Speaker 4: first hour. Because the government itself was alarming the people.
Speaker 4: So I think that they immediately initiated a program saying,
Speaker 4: let's see what these guys do when they don't have this.
Speaker 4: It's much easier than us to cut out the power.
Speaker 4: Because it happened, we don't have anything to do with it,
Speaker 4: we don't have rest responsibility. So let's see what these
Speaker 4: guys do. And they started bombarding people through the radio,
Speaker 4: through the news channels that people use we turned to
Speaker 4: when something happens, and all the channels were repeating the
Speaker 4: same message. You'll have three days to a week without power,
Speaker 4: Start going for water, start going for food, don't travel
Speaker 4: and so on, and so after one hour you had
Speaker 4: the pump stations that had no power, not allowing to
Speaker 4: put patrol on the cars. But the people were going
Speaker 4: anyway and blocking the roads because the pump stations didn't
Speaker 4: have space for all the cars. So they start making
Speaker 4: miles in miles into the roads with people stopped waiting
Speaker 4: to go to pump stations to go nowhere because it's
Speaker 4: just insane. Why because the news were alarming people to
Speaker 4: create these cows. Look, people had to be evacuated from
Speaker 4: the subway because the train stopped, no lights and it
Speaker 4: wasn't moving again, so they had to be a team
Speaker 4: going back down there getting people from the tunnels out.
Speaker 4: The trains stopped amid the tracks, so people had to
Speaker 4: come out in the tracks where there's fences and walk
Speaker 4: along the track until finding a station so they can
Speaker 4: get out of the track of the trains. Traffic hall
Speaker 4: block blocked out because there was no how you call it,
Speaker 4: the red green and traffic lights, traffic lights. There were
Speaker 4: no traffic lights, so it was chaos in a one hour.
Speaker 4: After two hours, the supermarkets were empty, empty, completely empty.
Speaker 4: In fact, two days after they were still empty, because
Speaker 4: there was no chance to taking that back and they
Speaker 4: were trusting us. I finished with this. They were trusting
Speaker 4: the population so much that the trucks that were taking
Speaker 4: patrol to the hospitals, to the generators to keep the
Speaker 4: minimum services were exculted by four police cars, two in
Speaker 4: the front and two in the back. Okay, in the
Speaker 4: beginning of a situation that we shouldn't be alarmed for
Speaker 4: it's just a cut of power, right, No, so two
Speaker 4: police cars heavily armed, we don't have that here, heavily
Speaker 4: armed in the front, and two in the back of
Speaker 4: the of the system turks that were delivering the petrol.
Speaker 4: So this shows me that they didn't know what's going on.
Speaker 4: They still don't know very well what happened, because they
Speaker 4: still get in the news, the Prime Minister and so
Speaker 4: in saying we don't know because the free hypothesis that
Speaker 4: they presented, they were all the night. So France denied
Speaker 4: the fire in the cables, the difference in the temperatures
Speaker 4: that still people are saying that was what caused it
Speaker 4: was small variations in the temperature is false. There was
Speaker 4: no small variations in temperature. The sun didn't cause it
Speaker 4: because there was no solar activity at all at that time,
Speaker 4: just the geomagnetic field of the years going wild and
Speaker 4: the all of these explanations were completely denied in time.
Speaker 4: So they just say, we don't know what happened, let's
Speaker 4: try to prevent to happen. And again, how do you
Speaker 4: prevent something that you don't know how it happened.
Speaker 1: So that's that's the oll.
Speaker 4: But just add for those that don't know, it happened
Speaker 4: again in Indonesia last night and it cut the flower
Speaker 4: through the whole city because it's not connected to anything else.
Speaker 4: It was just the underwater cables that give power to
Speaker 4: the to the to the island. So the island was
Speaker 4: in a complete backloud. Also because exactly where this high
Speaker 4: low pressure was once more exactly the same place at
Speaker 4: the same time.
Speaker 1: So two chances in.
Speaker 4: In two possibilities, sorry, two strikes in two possibilities.
Speaker 1: And we are having more and more and this.
Speaker 4: I would like to discuss this with you guys. We
Speaker 4: are seeing more and more Oura realities that usually I
Speaker 4: had to go to Norway to see, and now we
Speaker 4: are seeing in the north of my country. They are
Speaker 4: seeing them often in England, Germany, Holland and now was
Speaker 4: in Madagascar tonight one night or two nights ago in
Speaker 4: Madagascar they had a full night of Aurora realitist.
Speaker 1: So what's going on right? Well, I think personally, I
Speaker 1: think this has everything to do with the poles shifting. Sure,
Speaker 1: we've never seen it in our lifetimes or recorded history,
Speaker 1: so we don't know what we're looking for. And all
Speaker 1: of the explanations given by the government are terrible, they're garbage.
Speaker 1: But we do know that the government has been very,
Speaker 1: very interested in finding out about these pole shifts in
Speaker 1: the past. Unfortunately, they're not going to tell us about
Speaker 1: this stuff. They're going to keep feeding us this garbage
Speaker 1: about this slight variation in temperature and then trying to blame.
Speaker 2: Us for it.
Speaker 1: And I don't know if that was the original intention
Speaker 1: with all of this climate change garbage, but that's going
Speaker 1: to be their play from here on out.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: I had a friend in Spain. She was off the
Speaker 1: beaten track. She was in the countryside, which is where
Speaker 1: you want to be when these things start kicking off,
Speaker 1: And she said, you know, three days she was without
Speaker 1: cell phone service, she was without electricity, she didn't have
Speaker 1: anything out there. But you know, again they were prepared,
Speaker 1: so it didn't really make too much of a difference.
Speaker 1: There was also another friend of mine in the exact
Speaker 1: same time period visiting Pittsburgh, and Pittsburgh had a massive
Speaker 1: tornado that touchdown there during the same time period, and
Speaker 1: Space Weather News was saying that there was some kind
Speaker 1: of solar activity that took place over the North Atlantic.
Speaker 1: So these different storms could be the result of these,
Speaker 1: like you were saying, these high pressure low pressure systems
Speaker 1: and the weakening of the Earth's magnetic field. Now they're
Speaker 1: saying the weakening of the magnetic field is due to
Speaker 1: a slow down in or stoppage in the core of
Speaker 1: the Earth, and that could be what's causing these, you know,
Speaker 1: magnetic disturbances in our atmosphere creating such a degree of
Speaker 1: sort of chaos. Now, if we are going through a
Speaker 1: poll shift, it could be anywhere between now and twenty
Speaker 1: forty five, which that's a long time to put up
Speaker 1: with these ever increasing storms. But they think that once
Speaker 1: the spin energy has restarted in a different direction, that's
Speaker 1: when the pole shift happens. They don't know if that's
Speaker 1: going to change the pitch of the planet itself, which
Speaker 1: is going to totally screw up the climates all over
Speaker 1: the place. So we're talking about a different type of
Speaker 1: rotation happening to the planet. It's a possibility, but that
Speaker 1: totally changes the map for everybody. And if that's the case,
Speaker 1: there's going to be a huge slash of water that
Speaker 1: occurs in the change direction on this planet. So those
Speaker 1: are things that really keep in mind. And one of
Speaker 1: the things that occurs to me is if we are
Speaker 1: going through a pole shift right now, get to a
Speaker 1: place where the pole shifts have not affected those air
Speaker 1: is in the past. So, for instance, in Wisconsin, we
Speaker 1: have this area called the Driftless and I'm just right
Speaker 1: outside the Driftless. This was the most of the Midwest
Speaker 1: region was completely covered in ice caps, Like we're talking
Speaker 1: ten thousand foot walls of just ice cap all the
Speaker 1: way around the Midwest except for this one place called
Speaker 1: the Driftless, which was never hit by these ice caps.
Speaker 1: These glaciers and that's in southwestern Wisconsin. So if there's
Speaker 1: a good place to hang out, that would probably be it.
Speaker 1: Because it survived the last one. There are possibilities that
Speaker 1: it won't. But you know, if you're a betonman, I
Speaker 1: go with the places that have not been hit before.
Speaker 4: Sure, keeping mind that during the six thousand years ago
Speaker 4: a four thousand BC event with the Burkele Crater, well
Speaker 4: it was an impact, but we are talking about the
Speaker 4: the backwash of the water in case we change positions,
Speaker 4: so it's probably even more aggressive. But keep in mind
Speaker 4: that it happened at the coast of Madagascar and the
Speaker 4: water created erosion patterns three hundred kilometers in Australia, and
Speaker 4: these features are more than thirty meters high, created by
Speaker 4: these waves that enter through the territory three hundred kilometers.
Speaker 4: So I'm just sixty five kilometers from the ocean as
Speaker 4: the crow flies. So if it happens here and this
Speaker 4: is our planes, I'm completely I'm on the highest point
Speaker 4: around and I'm sixty meters high. Most of this is
Speaker 4: zero meters tall because this is the floodplains of the Tagos.
Speaker 4: My hope is the floodplains are so big that the
Speaker 4: water has a lot of space to go before it
Speaker 4: raises because this is all flat.
Speaker 1: So that's what I'm counting on.
Speaker 4: But you're right, and I think the first that's what
Speaker 4: I was talking you guys, the first guy talking about
Speaker 4: that movement of the Earth instead of being just a
Speaker 4: geomagnetic flip where the Earth doesn't move. I heard it
Speaker 4: first from Brent Miller on Coast to Coast and he
Speaker 4: associated with about twenty five academics showing him the data,
Speaker 4: putting everyone to research. She had about fifty associated researchers
Speaker 4: working on materials. Some speaks Chinese, other speaks wherever. But
Speaker 4: he got completely dismissed because of that of his proposal,
Speaker 4: including the ears itself changing his axis, and what came
Speaker 4: after is no, Now the Earth doesn't change his axis.
Speaker 4: The only thing that changes is it's theomagnetic field. So
Speaker 4: the norse is it will be south and that's it.
Speaker 4: Nothing else happens, there is nothing to it.
Speaker 1: So a lot the lines of the changing axis of
Speaker 1: the Earth. I wanted to bring up what is called
Speaker 1: in physics the tennis racket theorem, and I've got a
Speaker 1: quick clip here. If you look at how the tennis
Speaker 1: racket is thrown up into the air, it rotates on
Speaker 1: a third axis, and that is kind of how things
Speaker 1: would shift if there are three axises involved in the
Speaker 1: spin of the Earth, therefore changing how the Earth rotates
Speaker 1: on its axis. So if that's the case, and there
Speaker 1: is this tennis racket problem that we're facing now with
Speaker 1: the Earth's core and our rotation around the Sun, that
Speaker 1: flip could be a lot of damage, a whole lot
Speaker 1: of damage because all the shifting water and everything else
Speaker 1: in that sort of flip or that shift is going
Speaker 1: to have a seriously detrimental effect on the planet. I
Speaker 1: don't know if we have the reacxises, but if there
Speaker 1: is something that throws off the balance of the Earth
Speaker 1: in that regards, and let's keep in mind there are
Speaker 1: gravity pockets in places with much higher density than other places,
Speaker 1: so there are other forces that are, you know, impacting
Speaker 1: the spin of the Earth. So it's not that hard
Speaker 1: to assume that maybe some of these places with massive
Speaker 1: build up of crystal mountain ranges might throw off the
Speaker 1: balance of the Earth during a time when you would
Speaker 1: have the spin of the Earth being affected by the
Speaker 1: slowdown in the core. So these are physics problems We
Speaker 1: have to remember bathtub physics, because if you see no
Speaker 1: water out there, that means there will be a wave
Speaker 1: coming in real soon.
Speaker 4: This is no no, take your phone and film. Take
Speaker 4: your phone and film. That's that's what people do.
Speaker 1: Look, the water is going away, so funny, let's go
Speaker 1: to the edge. Let's film it.
Speaker 5: We've seen videos like that on Instagram where people are
Speaker 5: filming and they're like, oh wait, wait, wait, and then
Speaker 5: you see them running and stuff.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but did you see the level of perception of
Speaker 4: those people. The time of reaction is quite worrying because
Speaker 4: the wave is coming and they're still filming, and the
Speaker 4: wave is coming, and some of them don't even stop
Speaker 4: filming until the water hits them. It's like those people
Speaker 4: that think that the bear is something to make a pet.
Speaker 2: On seconds of that clip in the next guy, you
Speaker 2: might go famous.
Speaker 1: You know, it's complete insanity. It's insanity. So fame has
Speaker 1: a price. People, look this this.
Speaker 4: I never managed to find that document, but Brent Miller
Speaker 4: one of the documents that he was exposing is a
Speaker 4: document very old from China saying that the sun rose
Speaker 4: he reached to just before noon and then it stopped,
Speaker 4: which means the earth stopped, and then he went back
Speaker 4: and he sets exactly where he was born raised, and
Speaker 4: then he came up again and continue normally. So there
Speaker 4: are at least two or more reference of this kind
Speaker 4: of event in ancient texts, but unfortunately I never could
Speaker 4: find that document. But it's he has He gave the
Speaker 4: deity and everything for for for the event if that happened.
Speaker 1: Sorry, an ancient people were obsessed with tracking the sky,
Speaker 1: tracking these events and marking it down because they saw
Speaker 1: and their ancestors saw exactly the type of damage and
Speaker 1: devastation these events can have on the planet. So we've
Speaker 1: lost that, We've lost keeping track of these things, and
Speaker 1: even our best scientists are now only engaged in this
Speaker 1: you know, phony pseudoscience of climate change. And I think
Speaker 1: there's a reason for that. They were to be the
Speaker 1: first ones. The people who run this place want to
Speaker 1: be the first ones on the ship or the first
Speaker 1: ones in the cave, were the first ones to react,
Speaker 1: and they don't want you to react, so they're willing
Speaker 1: to fund things that will then get you your reaction
Speaker 1: times slowed down so that they could be the first
Speaker 1: ones anywhere they need to go.
Speaker 2: You know, they.
Speaker 1: Will be in the cave a week after a week
Speaker 1: before if they are alerted for it.
Speaker 5: You know, I do find that interesting because there was
Speaker 5: even some stuff that Ricardo you had mentioned earlier. Lisa
Speaker 5: had spoken about this whole idea to me probably about
Speaker 5: like two weeks ago. She was going on about like,
Speaker 5: use this same exact example as you did with the
Speaker 5: wooly mammoth and the food in its stomach, saying that
Speaker 5: she thinks sets us a flip and frozen or whatever.
Speaker 5: And she's going on, how like she's the one who
Speaker 5: told me about the planet's flipping. She's like, there are
Speaker 5: people in the scientific community that are like, yo, do
Speaker 5: you see what's happening? But yet the other side is like, oh,
Speaker 5: it's climate change, but you have pull over here are
Speaker 5: actually saying there's something we're going on, but yet there are.
Speaker 1: No there is climate change.
Speaker 5: There is Oh well yeah, I know, but they're pushing
Speaker 5: it like they're kind of like pushing it in a
Speaker 5: different way.
Speaker 4: And now, no, no, it's not unthropogenic. It's not unthropogenic.
Speaker 4: In fact, you won't find any study putting more than
Speaker 4: zero point six percent of athropogenic involvement in climate change.
Speaker 4: Zero point six percent. Okay, that's not ninety six percent
Speaker 4: that is presented in.
Speaker 1: Their in their models.
Speaker 4: And if you instruct a model to say them that
Speaker 4: CO two has one thousand or fifteen hundred percent effect
Speaker 4: of what he really has, the result of the model
Speaker 4: will be the alormism that we see in the models
Speaker 4: that they present us. They are completely funny because of
Speaker 4: funny phoney, because it's false information. They don't put the
Speaker 4: correct value for CO two. If they were saying to me, look,
Speaker 4: we have to stop with mercury emissions, or sulfytes emissions
Speaker 4: or several other gases that are very bad for the
Speaker 4: environment and even for us for our health, I would
Speaker 4: agree with them. Go attack the industry, don't attack the
Speaker 4: car or the human because the car has been grinning
Speaker 4: the planet for since it was made. It's the main
Speaker 4: responsible for the greening of the planet is the car
Speaker 4: and the production of CO two that we and the.
Speaker 1: Car has been doing.
Speaker 4: We should we now have four hundred and sixty to
Speaker 4: four hundred and eighty parts per million of carbon in
Speaker 4: the atmosphere. We should have eight hundred, not four hundred.
Speaker 5: And they want to reduce Yes, you reduce it any
Speaker 5: lower aren't you going to start killing plants at that point?
Speaker 4: Plants start dying at one hundred and eighty, but we
Speaker 4: stop having harvests. At about two hundred and forty, the
Speaker 4: harvest will be minimum, and at one hundred and eighty
Speaker 4: it starts to die, and they want the net zero.
Speaker 4: A net zero? Is this logical for anyone? Can anyone
Speaker 4: explain to me how a net zero is logic? They
Speaker 4: are cutting out trees to install machines to absorb carbon.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable.
Speaker 4: So we don't need oxygen anymore, apparently because they are
Speaker 4: taking the land producers of oxygen that naturally recycled the
Speaker 4: di accident the carbon dioxide, and they are changing it
Speaker 4: for machines that absorb the carbon. But don't he meete oxygen.
Speaker 1: This is the whole issue with fossil fuel. They call
Speaker 1: it fossil fuel because it's mostly algas that were then
Speaker 1: covered over with massive amounts of land. This is the
Speaker 1: theory behind fossil fuels. That means that all that carbon
Speaker 1: trapped in those algas that then become crude oil had
Speaker 1: CO two that was in the atmosphere originally, right, So
Speaker 1: all all humans are doing is now burning that fossil
Speaker 1: fuel and putting the CO two back into the atmosphere,
Speaker 1: which means that it was a much higher rate of
Speaker 1: CO two back when the Earth was much greener exactly.
Speaker 4: But the years is greener than they say. Have you
Speaker 4: seen the last report on trees on Sahara. They found
Speaker 4: millions of trees in the Sahara millions. Okay, we still
Speaker 4: see the sand, but there are millions of trees there
Speaker 4: that weren't. The planet is starting to green in the
Speaker 4: last fifteen years.
Speaker 1: It's greening.
Speaker 4: It's not being deflorestated, naturally, we are deflorestating some areas,
Speaker 4: but it's getting greener where it's wild because there is
Speaker 4: more carbon. They can eat more, they can breed more.
Speaker 4: And well, this is completely idiotic. This climate alarmism that
Speaker 4: they are making and put it into man has nothing
Speaker 4: to do with science. And if you see the scientists
Speaker 4: that are behind it, they are not scientists at all,
Speaker 4: unless they are very corrupt and associated in somehow with
Speaker 4: the only associations that are delivering us the information because
Speaker 4: the actual scientists and there's you go on Google and
Speaker 4: you see endless scientists, noble guys, Nobel prize guys saying
Speaker 4: that this is absurd.
Speaker 1: The problem is they don't get voice.
Speaker 4: The only people that get the voice are the ones
Speaker 4: that they select to have a voice. Because this is
Speaker 4: completely false information, completely, Well, do you have an advisement
Speaker 4: on this for sure if you post this, but this
Speaker 4: is complete false information. There are climate change, but it's natural,
Speaker 4: it happens naturally. In fact, we are going to an
Speaker 4: ice age. We're not going to heat. We are entering
Speaker 4: an ice age again.
Speaker 1: Oil saved the trees. And if anybody doubts this, all
Speaker 1: they need to do is look back at the photographs
Speaker 1: shortly after the Civil War and you'll notice that the
Speaker 1: forests all along the East Coast were clear cut. There
Speaker 1: was no more forest in those areas because they needed
Speaker 1: those trees for fuel. How they stayed warm in the winter.
Speaker 1: After we got oil, after we got petroleum, they didn't
Speaker 1: need to cut down all the forests anymore for fuel.
Speaker 1: We could heat our our homes Differently, we had electricity,
Speaker 1: we had all of these things. It was oil that
Speaker 1: save these forests. And all we're doing is putting that
Speaker 1: co two back into the atmosphere that was there when
Speaker 1: the planet was much greener. And if people really have
Speaker 1: a doubt about the effectiveness of CO two as being
Speaker 1: the driver of climate change. They just need to look
Speaker 1: at what the main driver of climate change is, which
Speaker 1: is H two. Oh, it's the clouds that keep in
Speaker 1: the heat. It's the clouds that act as a barrier
Speaker 1: for these things to get out. Now, unfortunately, even the
Speaker 1: scientists will all admit this. What they can't do is
Speaker 1: point to how CO two is increasing cloud cover. Nobody
Speaker 1: even tries, so the science itself is busted based off
Speaker 1: of the fact that you don't see CO two clouds
Speaker 1: that are keeping in the heat. It's only water vapor.
Speaker 4: That exactly in the heat, exactly, exactly, exactly that. Well,
Speaker 4: but we are safe because in England they are going
Speaker 4: to start to obscure the sky to cover the sun.
Speaker 4: And they were very clever because they decided to take
Speaker 4: the money from the agricultural from the farmers. They took
Speaker 4: any the last remains of support that they had from
Speaker 4: the farmers and they are not going to use it
Speaker 4: to block the sun. So the farmers are very happy
Speaker 4: because they not only they got less and less money,
Speaker 4: now they won't have the sun to grow the crops
Speaker 4: in a country that only has forty two days of
Speaker 4: sun a year or sixty.
Speaker 1: So this is all natural, This is all logical, all logical. Right.
Speaker 1: When we were talking to Old World Florida doctor Mark Colongo,
Speaker 1: he was talking about these warm currents in the Atlantic
Speaker 1: Ocean that causes there to be these massive clouds all
Speaker 1: around England most of the year. Those are the warm
Speaker 1: currents coming together with the colder polar currents creating those
Speaker 1: and that has caused a micro climate all around England
Speaker 1: to be very different from the rest of the world.
Speaker 1: What they're trying to do is mess with that micro
Speaker 1: climate and whether they're going to dry out England or
Speaker 1: they're going to make it even more wet, all they
Speaker 1: have to do is see the clouds and then they're
Speaker 1: they're messing with that micro climate, and you know, there's
Speaker 1: nothing they won't do to the British people anymore. I
Speaker 1: see video after video of these cops just harassing and
Speaker 1: destroying people. It's all part of the same agenda.
Speaker 4: I'm not sure if it's true, but I saw a
Speaker 4: video that looks real, and there are other reports similar,
Speaker 4: so I might be real. Of a guy being arrested
Speaker 4: by two cops at his home because he had reposted,
Speaker 4: not posted. He had reposted a comment from a friend
Speaker 4: saying that the new Lendhover Lendrover UH defender was more
Speaker 4: efficient or more capable. That's the words, more capable than
Speaker 4: the old one. So the guy was saying, are you
Speaker 4: seriously arresting me for doing a repost? And the guy says,
Speaker 4: a lot of people are upset. There's a lot of
Speaker 4: people upset what you wrote.
Speaker 1: I didn't wrote anything. I did the report.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but you upset a lot of people. So we
Speaker 4: are now upsetting people. We don't understand that a comment
Speaker 4: or an opinion is just that is an opinion. It's
Speaker 4: nothing for us to be aroused for and to see
Speaker 4: if the other person is rude, that's on his side, farewell.
Speaker 4: It's just that no one should get upset because of
Speaker 4: a comment online or even in person, because it's just
Speaker 4: an opinion, that's all it is. If we react to that,
Speaker 4: we are saying that he's right in my perspective. So,
Speaker 4: but but I wanted to say this. There are and
Speaker 4: this was discovered by the team of Brent Miller and
Speaker 4: then confirmed.
Speaker 1: That's one of the things that was confirmed.
Speaker 4: There are between the land of Fire at the bottom
Speaker 4: of South America. But the Patagonia, Okay, yeah, there are
Speaker 4: from there to the.
Speaker 1: Antarctica.
Speaker 4: Yeah, from there to Antarctica, there are thousands of square
Speaker 4: kilometers of frozen forests that are still in the bottom
Speaker 4: of the ocean. So a massive person of land entered
Speaker 4: the sea and was kept by the ice. They are
Speaker 4: still there, the base of the trunks and so on,
Speaker 4: They're still there, frozen in the bottom of the ocean.
Speaker 4: So if we have one of these scenarios, it's it's
Speaker 4: bye bye, because if the land is going, if you
Speaker 4: are underground, you are going with it. Or so I
Speaker 4: don't trust bunkers because if there is an earthquake or
Speaker 4: a massive land displacement, the bunker is no longer safe.
Speaker 4: It's it's a tomb that will smash it to bits
Speaker 4: inside of it. Another point that I wanted to ask
Speaker 4: YouTube is imagine that we have the amount of electric
Speaker 4: cars that we have today. Imagine that we have them
Speaker 4: thirty years ago. What would be the massive ecological impact
Speaker 4: on all of those batteries that have we have no
Speaker 4: way to recycle them. What was that impact on the land.
Speaker 4: So we now have impact with burials of garbage. We
Speaker 4: no longer bury it in the ground, there's no space
Speaker 4: or now making pyramids.
Speaker 1: I have a few around. They're making pyramids of garbage
Speaker 1: and then cover it up with with with soil.
Speaker 4: The storks love it, of course they they They spend
Speaker 4: hundreds of them going on on these pyramids to feed
Speaker 4: from the garbage. But batteries, they are going to contaminate
Speaker 4: the soil. They're going to do terrible things. It won't
Speaker 4: be able to produce any thing from that land in
Speaker 4: a thousand years or more.
Speaker 1: So, oh yeah, it's Look, it's.
Speaker 4: Like the batteries that you use for your remote controls
Speaker 4: and so on. Those batteries, there's no way to recycle that.
Speaker 4: That's just completely back to the environment.
Speaker 1: I get them wet because they'll recycle themselves. Once you
Speaker 1: get a lithium ion battery wet, they immediately catch fire.
Speaker 1: Oh and they don't go out with water, so you
Speaker 1: can spread all the water you want to. They're going
Speaker 1: to recycle themselves.
Speaker 4: But just to point that this is all a misconception,
Speaker 4: we have the whole population going in one direction being
Speaker 4: led by what is a lie. It is a lie.
Speaker 4: All of this is a lie. In fact, the first
Speaker 4: cars that existed, were electric. We are not on on
Speaker 4: on gasoline. They were electric. The problem is the autonomy.
Speaker 4: It was very short. And then came this this band's
Speaker 4: guy in eighteen eighteen ninety something and that small engine,
Speaker 4: and it was freedom. And it has been the same
Speaker 4: engine to this day, highly perfected. And now it's we
Speaker 4: are turning away that perfection that we had accomplished. First
Speaker 4: of all, we are ready destroying it by the particle
Speaker 4: filters and the catalyzers and all of that are already
Speaker 4: taking the efficiency that we take managed to take out
Speaker 4: of these engines, So they are reducing it seriously.
Speaker 1: But we should we should talk a little bit about
Speaker 1: what you can do to make your cars safe from
Speaker 1: an event like the Carrington event where you have a
Speaker 1: massive solar flare. Again, there's going to be no protection
Speaker 1: from our electrical grid on top of us in the atmosphere.
Speaker 1: So there are steps you could take that can save
Speaker 1: your car from being completely useless after a Carrington event.
Speaker 1: And I think one of the main things is having
Speaker 1: an extra alternator on hand that you keep inside of
Speaker 1: a Faraday cage along with spare battery. Having that extra
Speaker 1: alternator and spare battery on hand just in case your
Speaker 1: carget hit. You're never going to be able to predict
Speaker 1: when these uh, when these massive solar flares are gonna hit.
Speaker 1: They have some idea, but other times you can't see
Speaker 1: the other side of the sun. So if it's off
Speaker 1: gassing a massive thing, we go into it, how would
Speaker 1: we be able to tell. So there are ways you
Speaker 1: can prevent your car from being completely useless in a
Speaker 1: catastrophe unless it burns all the wires. Well, that's why
Speaker 1: you keep it in a faraday cage. You no the
Speaker 1: wires of the car.
Speaker 4: Oh, I would advise, I would advise to buy a beetle. Yeah,
Speaker 4: take the battery out, take the alternator. There's no more wiring.
Speaker 4: It's all cables. So you take the plug. How you
Speaker 4: call the plugs the spark plugs. You take the spark plugs,
Speaker 4: You take the distributor, you take the alternator, and take
Speaker 4: the battery and there's nothing more to be burned in
Speaker 4: that car.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's what that's German, right.
Speaker 4: Yeah, maybe the name of Volkswagen means people's car, which
Speaker 4: never was.
Speaker 1: It was a fraud from Hitler to the people.
Speaker 5: I was gonna say, maybe maybe Hitler did understand that
Speaker 5: pole shift.
Speaker 1: There's a reason why they were so attracted to Antarctica. Right.
Speaker 1: If there is a pole shift and the rotation of
Speaker 1: the Earth is messed up, Antarctica now becomes viable growing
Speaker 1: land and it's one of the biggest continents. So as
Speaker 1: soon as that ice melts, I mean, we've got all
Speaker 1: the evidence throughout all of you know, the geological records
Speaker 1: showing that there were plants and animals on Antarctica.
Speaker 4: Let me just say sorry to interrupt you very quickly.
Speaker 4: I have footage of the middle of Antarctica and there's
Speaker 4: no ice, and it's a documentary on television, and it disappeared.
Speaker 4: They disappeared with it, but I still have the video,
Speaker 4: and you have about two minutes two minutes and a
Speaker 4: half with footage of Antarctica.
Speaker 1: As soon as you pass first the first.
Speaker 4: Mountains, it's all land, no ice. The ice only goes around.
Speaker 4: It's a complete valleys with massive amounts of space that
Speaker 4: there's no ice whatsoever in it. It's cold, but there
Speaker 4: is no ice because it doesn't have out water and
Speaker 4: doesn't snow, so it's impossible to have ice. So the
Speaker 4: guys that that's why they don't allow anyone to do
Speaker 4: what they did three or four times in the in
Speaker 4: the sixties and seventies, that is to start on one
Speaker 4: end of the Antarctica and walk all the way to
Speaker 4: the other side. Because when people crossed the first mountains,
Speaker 4: what the heck, where where's the ice? There's no ice here.
Speaker 4: We are coping in like we are in Australia with
Speaker 4: a bit cold. That's the difference, because it's all desert
Speaker 4: and there's no ice. And they stopped it completely. They
Speaker 4: so you're not allowed to film, you're not allowed to
Speaker 4: go and over it, to fly over it because there's
Speaker 4: no ice.
Speaker 1: I've seen some super ultra marathon runners say that they
Speaker 1: did the entire Antarctic continent, and what they do is
Speaker 1: they go to the middle and then they run back
Speaker 1: the way they came. Like, why aren't they going all
Speaker 1: the way across? I thought that was the point. This
Speaker 1: is what flat earthers used is their evidence for a
Speaker 1: long time. But I think there's a reason why all
Speaker 1: of these countries of the world are at war with
Speaker 1: each other up here in the northern climates, but down
Speaker 1: there they get along perfectly. There's never any problems, and
Speaker 1: all of our elected leaders go down to Antarctica to
Speaker 1: have these big old conferences. If we don't know what's
Speaker 1: going on down there, it's completely separate from the rest
Speaker 1: of society. It is the definition of a parallel society.
Speaker 1: That's what's going on. Yeah, but they're having problems of late. Yeah.
Speaker 4: So first of all, there was the arrassment you called
Speaker 4: whether you try to grab.
Speaker 1: A woman, how sexual harassment.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah, there was harassment from a guy that was taking
Speaker 4: students there and he started to get real touchy. But
Speaker 4: that I didn't associate with anything. But the next one
Speaker 4: I started associating. So they are now showing cases of
Speaker 4: people getting really really violent.
Speaker 1: So this was supposed.
Speaker 4: To be matters of movies that we've seen many years ago,
Speaker 4: that isolation and so on and so on, and they
Speaker 4: are having more and more cases of people going completely
Speaker 4: mad and trying to hit everyone and kill everyone and
Speaker 4: so on in this both in north and in south,
Speaker 4: particularly in souths. But the fact that there is this
Speaker 4: association of nations in Antarctica, but they are restricted to
Speaker 4: that coast area. They are not allowed to go inland.
Speaker 4: It's just that small coastal area. It's it's very strange
Speaker 4: and if you remember when when the tenth planet gained
Speaker 4: traction again some twenty years ago, they were associating these
Speaker 4: establishments of countries there because they say that they had
Speaker 4: a vast way of parabolic antennas and that was the
Speaker 4: only place they could follow the planet from the Earth,
Speaker 4: because it was the only one always ponting with it,
Speaker 4: because it was coming from the south and behind the Sun,
Speaker 4: and so they had to go there because the Earth
Speaker 4: doesn't rotate, it doesn't matter. It's in the middle, and
Speaker 4: they could be always focusing on that planet.
Speaker 1: But I never bought that. I don't deny it either. Well,
Speaker 1: it is interesting that the North and South poles are
Speaker 1: the only ways out of the Van Allen radiation belt.
Speaker 1: So all of the aged civilizations could say the North
Speaker 1: the way out of this reality, and somehow they were
Speaker 1: proven right by the Van Allen radiation belt not being
Speaker 1: stronger on top of these poles. And so basically that's
Speaker 1: the way to get out of this planet. You'd have
Speaker 1: to blast a rocket off from the North pole to
Speaker 1: get out of the Van Allen radiation belt without frying yourself.
Speaker 1: How did they know that? How could they possibly know that? Well,
Speaker 1: experience is the only way.
Speaker 2: Right, that's the only way to truly know right expence.
Speaker 1: But that Van Allen radiation belt is what usually protects
Speaker 1: us against solar flares. It hits the Van Allen radiation
Speaker 1: belt and then goes around the planet instead of hitting
Speaker 1: it directly. That's what's keeping was keeping us safe. And
Speaker 1: now is the you know magnetosphere is failing, We're going
Speaker 1: to be seeing a lot of changes happen. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know if this is what must school's planning on,
Speaker 1: and this is how he wants to get to Mars
Speaker 1: or whatever, but that once that radiation belt is down,
Speaker 1: that's when people can leave or massive solar flares can
Speaker 1: come in.
Speaker 4: So well, I think I think Ellen, if he doesn't know,
Speaker 4: he'll gets surprised because what he intends to do was
Speaker 4: done many years ago. So of course this is all speculation.
Speaker 4: But you had several problems, several programs, including one in
Speaker 4: the sixties that was called Alternative Free. That was when
Speaker 4: they when they came that report from the forties saying
Speaker 4: that this was going to happen. That was censored many
Speaker 4: years and now we got to report back.
Speaker 1: A few years ago.
Speaker 4: They decided to create a plan to take the best
Speaker 4: people that they can find, snap them and.
Speaker 1: Take them to Mars. And true or not.
Speaker 4: What I can say is I when I was still
Speaker 4: on Facebook from my first account, it was blocked. They
Speaker 4: kicked me out. There was this guy that was keeping
Speaker 4: sending me messages from five days, ten days to ten days.
Speaker 4: He send me message from what he called It was
Speaker 4: his sister that was one of those persons that was
Speaker 4: on Mars. She was getting quite old and could move
Speaker 4: around less suspiciously. Everyone knew her, and she was managing
Speaker 4: to send him several pictures of that that unfortunately was
Speaker 4: lost among with my ten thousand images from my disk
Speaker 4: when it broke. But I had lots of pictures of
Speaker 4: the place itself, of one of the facilities there, and
Speaker 4: there was no AI to create those images. Not I
Speaker 4: never found anywhere or nurse, but could be an underground place,
Speaker 4: could be many things, could be completely false. But the
Speaker 4: fact is there are at least two documentaries about it.
Speaker 4: The alternative Free that was banned television. I still have it.
Speaker 4: And at the end of the documentary you see a
Speaker 4: ship landing with two astronauts, so three astronauts on Mars,
Speaker 4: and that those crappy cameras and they was talking to Houston.
Speaker 4: Of course it's not televised. This is completely private, right,
Speaker 4: we never gone to Mars. And so when they land,
Speaker 4: the first thing they see is what they thought it
Speaker 4: was a rock because they were starting to film to
Speaker 4: the outside, right Koreans to see we're landed on Mars,
Speaker 4: and one of the rocks starts moving, and then it's
Speaker 4: panic and then the image is cut it by the
Speaker 4: Houston cuts completely the footage, and that's how it ends.
Speaker 4: Mars was an inhabited planet, at least as a biome.
Speaker 4: I don't say it has intelligent life as humans. But
Speaker 4: you have ruins, you have Sidonia, you have two three faces.
Speaker 4: One of them they destroyed completely. If you go and
Speaker 4: see the first Viking images with the images you see
Speaker 4: today and the images they presented in the middle has
Speaker 4: nothing to do with it. It is either it isn't
Speaker 4: the same structure or it has nothing to do with it.
Speaker 4: Because the first face that Viking take the picture off,
Speaker 4: it's almost above it, and it's a perfect face. It's
Speaker 4: a perfect face. It's like sculptured in marble. And the
Speaker 4: second one they showed us was like a very eroded
Speaker 4: misconception ape like face that has nothing to do with
Speaker 4: the pure marble one that was the initial image.
Speaker 1: And now you see a nuked I.
Speaker 4: Call it nooked because I think they obviously send something
Speaker 4: there and actually destroyed it, because no erosion on Mars
Speaker 4: would cause that kind of destruction on the structure.
Speaker 1: Well, have you ever heard of Joe McGonagall. They call
Speaker 1: them remote viewer number one. No, So Joe was a
Speaker 1: He was in the army for a lot of years.
Speaker 1: He became special Forces. He did a lot of stuff
Speaker 1: at Vietnam, and then he got hired to be a
Speaker 1: remote viewer for the government. Well, he never wanted to
Speaker 1: remote view anything that he couldn't confirm, because anything having
Speaker 1: to do with unconfirmed reports just becomes useless in terms
Speaker 1: of your tracking data. As a remote viewer, you have
Speaker 1: to have confirmation or disconfirmation to know if you're doing
Speaker 1: it right or not. Well, he was given a target
Speaker 1: for his coordinate remote viewing of Mars one million BC,
Speaker 1: and he was seeing pyramid shapes. He was seeing a
Speaker 1: huddled group of people who were you know, maybe like
Speaker 1: twelve feet tall in this sort of you know, dance
Speaker 1: of death. Because they knew that their planet was dying
Speaker 1: and they had to get off of the planet and
Speaker 1: probably go to Earth. Well that kind of thing. He's like, well,
Speaker 1: what is this place? What are you talking about? Because
Speaker 1: remote viewing you're not supposed to know what your handler
Speaker 1: is hiding from you first off, and so he's like, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is Mars one million bc', and he's like, I
Speaker 1: told you never to give me anything that I can't confirm.
Speaker 1: So instead he went to JPL and he started to
Speaker 1: look up the images of the area on Mars from
Speaker 1: today in that remote viewing that he that he gave,
Speaker 1: and he found a lot of corresponding images that matched
Speaker 1: his view into Mars one million BC. So he did
Speaker 1: get some confirmation that there were structures in this area,
Speaker 1: and there were structures large enough and not natural enough
Speaker 1: where you could see them from the satellites that were
Speaker 1: going around Mars at the time. So you've got a
Speaker 1: lot of tangential confirmation at least through what he was saying.
Speaker 1: And also the isotopic radiation in the Mars atmosphere is
Speaker 1: significantly similar to the isotopes produced from an atomic bomb,
Speaker 1: so they might have tried to get their own core
Speaker 1: going again or maybe they were trying to nuke the
Speaker 1: atmosphere to create enough particulates to start having that heating
Speaker 1: effect again. Or there was a war going on in space.
Speaker 1: These are all different ideas, but you know, if that's
Speaker 1: If that's the case, and Mars was habitable at one time, who.
Speaker 4: Knows what they tried to do to make it better,
Speaker 4: But we know, haven't you seen total recall?
Speaker 1: Right, there could be a lot more to that total
Speaker 1: recall movement.
Speaker 2: Put your hand on that thing and you just have
Speaker 2: to react as you get to go.
Speaker 1: Well, if you look at the shape of his hand
Speaker 1: in that in that he had the three fingers. But
Speaker 1: that's right, that's also the Jewish symbol that they use
Speaker 1: in Star Trek that means live long and prosper there.
Speaker 1: But that was also a wish blessing. That's where Leonard
Speaker 1: Nimoy got it from because he was raised at a
Speaker 1: Jewish household. That's actually part of Jewish magic. So I
Speaker 1: think it's kind of interesting that they have this triedactal
Speaker 1: hand that's using the same sort of shape that you
Speaker 1: know they used in Star Trek and several other different
Speaker 1: forms well triedactal mummies down in in uh right, So
Speaker 1: this could be some sort of genetic memory or ancestral
Speaker 1: memory about these triedactal aliens pieces with eggs inside of it,
Speaker 1: and the guy paid for the testing and the testing
Speaker 1: came not human.
Speaker 4: So whatever it is, that's that's probably the thing that
Speaker 4: should be getting more attention in the world right now,
Speaker 4: because I don't get it.
Speaker 1: Why are people paying it? Like, I'll retweet it and
Speaker 1: they won't even get.
Speaker 4: A single hit, like nothing, nothing, nothing, it's too far
Speaker 4: out right, doesn't matter if it is real. That's how
Speaker 4: consciousness works. It doesn't matter if it's if it is
Speaker 4: too far out outside of your belief system, you just
Speaker 4: don't pay any attention to it.
Speaker 1: So I think this had a lot to do with
Speaker 1: their presentation of those fake mummies and the Mexican Senate
Speaker 1: right after twenty seventeen. They had these paper mache mummies
Speaker 1: that they brought to the house and they're like, look,
Speaker 1: these are real, and they're like, looking at it, there's
Speaker 1: no way. But this is different than that. This isn't
Speaker 1: the same group, no note at all that, But I
Speaker 1: think they were successful in poisoning the well so much. Yes,
Speaker 1: now you can just show it over and over again, Hey,
Speaker 1: these are mummies that are tried to act on, not human.
Speaker 1: They found it.
Speaker 4: Through You can put the most believed person on the
Speaker 4: planet speaking about this and presenting on TV for everyone
Speaker 4: to see, and when it ends, people go, oh, this
Speaker 4: guy used to be good.
Speaker 3: We used to be able to trust this. Now it
Speaker 3: comes with this bullshit. It's too far out. It's too
Speaker 3: far out. But it's a funny thing. Society is because.
Speaker 4: The way they use the system to control this belief
Speaker 4: system is as as all evanders, he says in Harry Potter,
Speaker 4: is terrible but great because they are amazing. I take
Speaker 4: my head to these people, because the capability of adapting,
Speaker 4: the ability they have to create things that have no
Speaker 4: purpose than to serve themselves, the manipulation, the subliminary information,
Speaker 4: the educational system, the destruction of family, the destruction of sex,
Speaker 4: the or gender sorry because sex made people missink another thing,
Speaker 4: the destruction of gender. Sex is being implemented greatly, especially visually.
Speaker 4: So all of this, the crash of the educational system
Speaker 4: they are leading us into. If we are thinking that
Speaker 4: the world is going to end, and I'm trying to
Speaker 4: keep in charge of things, and I know it's going
Speaker 4: to be tremendous chaos and upheaval, and I will have
Speaker 4: to implement things that some people will applaud and others won't.
Speaker 4: What I have to do is to dumb these people
Speaker 4: as much as possible and put it under my spell.
Speaker 4: So when I call, I get only the dumb and
Speaker 4: the idiots to come to my side, and I will
Speaker 4: be able to keep manipulating them. They will be few
Speaker 4: more manageable because a lot of them are going to
Speaker 4: die anyway, and the ones that resist will have to
Speaker 4: live in the wilderness with stone age technology, so they
Speaker 4: won't be a problem and they won't want to come
Speaker 4: to our side. So what I have seen in these
Speaker 4: twenty years or so is that there will be a
Speaker 4: rift in society where we'll have to choose social credit
Speaker 4: or wilderness. And I think they were ready to consider
Speaker 4: us that wilderness, as long as we don't interfere with
Speaker 4: society excelf itself. So, and if you think correct about
Speaker 4: every time that there has been a catastropher, you see
Speaker 4: more or less this. You see these cities organizing, but
Speaker 4: a lot of people living free and wild, and then
Speaker 4: eventually the cities grow enough and they absorb these sites
Speaker 4: that these other communities that have no way to defend
Speaker 4: to the more advanced society in technological terms.
Speaker 1: Right. And I think if people think they're immune from
Speaker 1: being influenced by the government, now that you know, social
Speaker 1: media and influencers have kind of taken over. Just remember
Speaker 1: anytime you see these bills passing in the House, there
Speaker 1: were a group of people out there who were specifically saying,
Speaker 1: you cannot limit welfare recipients access to soda. Right. These
Speaker 1: were conservative influencers who were being paid to put out
Speaker 1: that message. So all it takes is a little bit
Speaker 1: of push from the higher ups, and this entire alternative
Speaker 1: media sphere goes the exact way that they want them
Speaker 1: to go, just a little bit of a push. It's
Speaker 1: an unfortunate reality. But we haven't really escaped the matrix
Speaker 1: of information yet.
Speaker 4: I made this question recently, how is it possible because
Speaker 4: I'm not American, but you are, how is it possible
Speaker 4: that there is not an upriot of the whole American people.
Speaker 4: When they finally some years ago or last year, I
Speaker 4: don't remember, they revealed how they started Vietnam War, that
Speaker 4: they dressed Americans as Vietnamese, they stole a Vietnamese boat,
Speaker 4: and they attacked their own harbor to simulate an attack
Speaker 4: from the Vietnamese, and that's what started the war. So
Speaker 4: this came out, and I didn't see any group of
Speaker 4: Americans say, and all the people that died, and all
Speaker 4: the people that we send into there, and all the
Speaker 4: trauma that these people have, and the problems that cost
Speaker 4: for the families and the development of the country and
Speaker 4: so on, was all made by the government. And I
Speaker 4: don't see anyone, any American come out in cre or groups,
Speaker 4: not one, but groups of US people saying this is
Speaker 4: a scandalous thing that cannot happen. Let's create systems of transparency,
Speaker 4: let's finish this rubbish of war because we can't believe
Speaker 4: anything anymore. But I don't see any of reaction in
Speaker 4: that sense. And I find it fascinating because they know
Speaker 4: when they could release it and the public just go,
Speaker 4: oh yeah, yeah, just another thing that they did, as
Speaker 4: exactly as they will do with the towers in twenty
Speaker 4: or thirty years if the world does an end, they
Speaker 4: will also reveal those papers and we'll just say, oh yeah,
Speaker 4: that's just a thing that they did, and that's it.
Speaker 1: And they get away with it. I think what few
Speaker 1: people really understand is just how docile the American people
Speaker 1: really are. We talk about, oh well, at least we
Speaker 1: got our guns, at least we got our God, at
Speaker 1: least we got our books. That's not going to hold up.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, that's not going to change the opinions of
Speaker 1: the people who rule you. They figure, you know, you
Speaker 1: have guns, but we have all these people we can
Speaker 1: just program to go out and do whatever we order
Speaker 1: them to. It doesn't matter what we tell them to do.
Speaker 1: They're going to do it anyway. And so looking from
Speaker 1: the top down and looking from the bottom up, there
Speaker 1: doesn't seem to be a whole lot of payoff in
Speaker 1: actually opposing these people by putting their lives on the line.
Speaker 1: It just doesn't seem to make too much of a
Speaker 1: difference to the people in charge if you do that
Speaker 1: or not. They don't really care. And that's sort of
Speaker 1: the way it is. I mean, unless there is, you know,
Speaker 1: a surefire way of doing the kind of revolutionary action
Speaker 1: that's going to be required, people aren't going to invest
Speaker 1: their time or money in any of it because what's
Speaker 1: it going to really accomplish. The entire thing is a fraud.
Speaker 1: It's it's all just a very it's very transparent at
Speaker 1: this point now that we have no control or say
Speaker 1: over what our government does, and that's that's pretty much
Speaker 1: the way it's going to be. So I think really
Speaker 1: getting yourself prepared and understanding that the idea of self
Speaker 1: preservation over nation state preservation is going to have to trump,
Speaker 1: you know, the collective at every time there's no there's
Speaker 1: no more draft. And it's not because they don't have
Speaker 1: the ability to enact a draft. People will not do it.
Speaker 1: We will not put up with it. So at some point,
Speaker 1: if they come for us and tell us that we've
Speaker 1: got to be part of their army and we've got
Speaker 1: to go sacrifice ourselves for the homeland, it's not going
Speaker 1: to happen. And there's very few people in our lives
Speaker 1: nowadays that we are willing to sacrifice ourselves for. And
Speaker 1: that's directly the fault of the people who have taken
Speaker 1: all of the I hate and trust of the American
Speaker 1: people and flush it down the toilet.
Speaker 4: Look the military budget in terms of military complex, reduction
Speaker 4: of arms development, and so on, just that a fraction
Speaker 4: of that money could end homeless and starvation and lack
Speaker 4: of medical care in the whole world alone in less
Speaker 4: than two years. With end anger and the homeless, people
Speaker 4: will give medical treatment to those who don't have it.
Speaker 4: So are we advanced? Is this what we are calling this?
Speaker 4: Is this advanced civilization while we really kill the really
Speaker 4: advanced civilizations we find in the megalytic world or so on?
Speaker 4: Is this what we call advance that we can even
Speaker 4: take care of our own because we have borders, the
Speaker 4: imaginary lines that divide the country, saying that you are
Speaker 4: different from me. Just remember what happened in the First
Speaker 4: World War when in Christmas they decided to make a
Speaker 4: dinner between German and the Allied forces on the trenches
Speaker 4: and they played football after the dinner. Next day, none
Speaker 4: of those that were present accepted to go back and fight.
Speaker 4: They had to send them home and forbid them to
Speaker 4: speak with others because the enemy was no longer the enemy.
Speaker 4: It was just another guy on the other side.
Speaker 1: Right like them. So the definition between good and evil
Speaker 1: was completely shattered, right, And it's all about the manipulation
Speaker 1: of polarities, right. So I think if we had a
Speaker 1: decent education system that broke down these ideas in such
Speaker 1: a way that they could be retaught to the children. Again,
Speaker 1: they have to be able to dial up and dial
Speaker 1: back the education system to make people dumber or smarter
Speaker 1: based upon the needs of the government. This is why
Speaker 1: we have public education. Because they found that the people
Speaker 1: who were educated independently were a lot harder to control
Speaker 1: than the ones who were institutionally developed. And so the
Speaker 1: understanding of education is so vital because you see what
Speaker 1: happens in a dumbed down society. We're looking at it now.
Speaker 1: The progression of our education system has only gone downhill.
Speaker 1: You see the grades dropping, you see everything else dropping
Speaker 1: as we give them more money. It's almost like we're
Speaker 1: paying them more to make us dumber. That's not an accident.
Speaker 4: Look when you go to a test, and we heard
Speaker 4: this in Europe for many years of America right now,
Speaker 4: when you go to a test and all you have
Speaker 4: to do is put crosses on squares. You don't have
Speaker 4: to write, you just have to put xes on squares.
Speaker 4: There's no intellectual involvement in there. There's only the act
Speaker 4: of a memory saying that's correct or that's incorrect. There's
Speaker 4: no rational thought inquiring, no justification. There's nothing there's just acceptance,
Speaker 4: and that's indocrination. That's not teaching, that's indocrinate people to
Speaker 4: see only that. And that's why when these people came
Speaker 4: out of the system and they are graduated, they call
Speaker 4: themselves doctors. That is the most common name on earth.
Speaker 4: For those who don't know, doctor is the most common
Speaker 4: name on earth. There's a lot of doctors out there,
Speaker 4: and that means absolutely nothing. If I know a person
Speaker 4: that comes to me and says I'm doctor, I immediately
Speaker 4: lose interest because he's faulted as a person.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry to.
Speaker 4: Those out there that listening to this and they call
Speaker 4: themselves doctors. But that's how I see it, not because
Speaker 4: I'm not a doctor, but that's like saying, Hi, I'm
Speaker 4: the king, or Hi, I'm the one in charge here.
Speaker 4: Oh Hi, I'm the one that knows more because I
Speaker 4: have this doctor before. You don't know more because you
Speaker 4: don't know what you don't know. Doesn't matter how much
Speaker 4: you know, you still don't understand what you don't know.
Speaker 4: And as long as us that out here are questioning
Speaker 4: everything and don't discarding anything and taking all into account
Speaker 4: and not looking at it just from one side, one
Speaker 4: minor point on investigation or history or scientific approach. We
Speaker 4: are looking at from the whole bunch, from the metaphysical
Speaker 4: to the physical. It's obviously that our vision is going
Speaker 4: to be brother, although perhaps not as correct as he
Speaker 4: has of that small piece. But that small piece alone
Speaker 4: doesn't do much because it's not associated.
Speaker 1: It never can get to the answers. It's the type
Speaker 1: of nominative determinism that really just hits head on into
Speaker 1: the uncanny valley. So nominative determinism is where you've got
Speaker 1: a person named right who becomes a lawyer because Lawrence
Speaker 1: is right. So you've got all these people calling them
Speaker 1: some doctors who really believe it, but really are they doctors?
Speaker 1: You know, there's this nominative determinism in a lot of things.
Speaker 1: You find it. You know, people who are named a
Speaker 1: certain thing end up gravitating towards a certain field. Uh.
Speaker 1: I wonder what Ky Dickens, the one who did the
Speaker 1: telepathy tapes, was meant to do. But you know she's
Speaker 1: a lesbian. There's something there, You know, there's always something
Speaker 1: there to this nominative determinism. And so basically, are we
Speaker 1: the ones determining our favor? Is there something more to
Speaker 1: the idea that what we call ourselves tricks our minds
Speaker 1: into believing a certain way.
Speaker 5: She's a lesbian with the way with the name k
Speaker 5: Y Dickens.
Speaker 1: That's why, that's why she.
Speaker 2: That has to be a joke. It has to be
Speaker 2: somewhere in there.
Speaker 4: It doesn't need to be if she's the alpha.
Speaker 2: Oh, but I think.
Speaker 1: It's really interesting that, you know, we always end up
Speaker 1: thinking that somebody else is planning this. But if you
Speaker 1: name these things and you refer to these things your
Speaker 1: whole life, do you really have control over what you
Speaker 1: think and how you feel? You know, you're telling yourself
Speaker 1: this stuff every single day in your life.
Speaker 4: And if you go to a self motivation or self
Speaker 4: help or whatever is these conferences, that's exactly what the
Speaker 4: guy or the girl will hammer into your head. That is,
Speaker 4: it doesn't matter if you are barefoot, if you believe
Speaker 4: you have shoes, you have shoes, and so and then
Speaker 4: there are five thousand, okay, let's put it five hundred
Speaker 4: people on there. There will be two or three people
Speaker 4: that we'll understand what he's actually saying and will actually
Speaker 4: succeed in life from those advices. But the rest of
Speaker 4: them they just give money to the guy or the girl.
Speaker 4: There's nothing more. They didn't take that because they don't
Speaker 4: have it in them. That's why in the first place
Speaker 4: they are there, because they don't have.
Speaker 1: It in them.
Speaker 4: So right, turning, turning aside, because I don't know how
Speaker 4: long Nick was was going.
Speaker 1: To have us.
Speaker 2: Sorry, I probably got it about another ten minutes.
Speaker 1: Okay, So I was gonna say, we can we can
Speaker 1: use that nominative determinism to help with the poll shift.
Speaker 1: If we can get everybody to do and think, let's
Speaker 1: get this over with, we could probably minimize a lot
Speaker 1: of the damage that can go along with it, because
Speaker 1: I think there is a connection between the human mind
Speaker 1: and the and the bio field of the planet.
Speaker 4: Sure, sure, and you'll have people feeling it physically as
Speaker 4: he changes, for sure. But in terms of preparation, I
Speaker 4: have very simple advice this on your area, because we
Speaker 4: don't know if we need to run into the sea,
Speaker 4: run into the air, run into space, or run into
Speaker 4: a cave. Right, But for us that cannot go into
Speaker 4: the air or into space, because into the air, I
Speaker 4: would advise you to those that have air adrooms near
Speaker 4: you airfields to keep watching what kind of planes are there,
Speaker 4: and then use flight simulator and learn to fly to
Speaker 4: fly that plane, because it's not that difficult. I've flown
Speaker 4: a plane once without any lessons. I didn't land or
Speaker 4: take off, but I made a one hundred and eighty
Speaker 4: degree turn.
Speaker 1: To get back to the track and flow a little bit.
Speaker 1: So it's not hard.
Speaker 4: And I have very little time in flight simulator. So
Speaker 4: if you need to run to the air if you
Speaker 4: have an airfield near you, start checking the planes that
Speaker 4: are there. Learn how to open the.
Speaker 1: The keys and so on.
Speaker 4: Second, go into marinas, look into boats. See what sailboats
Speaker 4: are there, memorize them, see which one suits you. Because
Speaker 4: no one is going to ask for it after an event,
Speaker 4: it's going to be there. It's not stealing because it's
Speaker 4: social chaos. It's not something we can come back from.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 4: If it is the same thing that does lasts three
Speaker 4: days or one week, yeah, don't go and steal. But
Speaker 4: if it's something that is permanent and you are trying
Speaker 4: to save your family, just sorry for my language.
Speaker 1: Fuck it.
Speaker 2: Times like that.
Speaker 4: So and find a high ground cave near your home.
Speaker 4: And this is very important. The cave must have a
Speaker 4: natural source of water. If it doesn't have it doesn't
Speaker 4: suit you because you'll have to come out to search
Speaker 4: for water. But it will be hard enough to come
Speaker 4: out and look for rabbits and whatever animals are there
Speaker 4: to eat, so water, you don't want to go around
Speaker 4: looking for water when they're there's lots of people around
Speaker 4: trying to steal from those that have something. Last recommendation,
Speaker 4: don't be a prepper, and if you are a prepper,
Speaker 4: don't tell anyone you are a prepper, because if you
Speaker 4: tell people that you are a prepper and you are
Speaker 4: showing everyone how to prepper, you'll be the first target.
Speaker 4: When there is nothing available on the supermarkets. They'll be
Speaker 4: starting to plea they will knock on your door and
Speaker 4: when you start saying no, no, no, they'll come back
Speaker 4: with guns. They'll come back with massive people. They'll burn
Speaker 4: your house down. No one, it's not a dam nor you.
Speaker 4: So don't tell anyone if you are a prepper, because
Speaker 4: you're going to be a target for the community where
Speaker 4: you live in.
Speaker 1: One thing I could add to is there's a reason
Speaker 1: why we don't have commercially available zeppelins for people to buy.
Speaker 1: If you think about it, a zeppelin would be like
Speaker 1: an RV in the sky, and there have been designs
Speaker 1: I've seen companies that were trying to make that happen.
Speaker 1: They never, metaphorically reality, ever got off the ground. But
Speaker 1: if you think about it, you're in the sky. You
Speaker 1: don't have to power the thing, and you don't have
Speaker 1: to worry about coming down when shit's going down, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, if you have a zeppelin, you're in the
Speaker 1: best position for any sort of disaster because you're not
Speaker 1: gonna get struck by lightning. You're you're not going to
Speaker 1: be hit by any of them winds. Winds are a problem,
Speaker 1: but I mean, that's why you've got a zeppelin is
Speaker 1: because they're they can be bumpeted by by some wins
Speaker 1: and not get taken out. They're pretty hardy, uh, you
Speaker 1: know airships and this is you know, one of the
Speaker 1: reasons why they got rid of the airships is because
Speaker 1: of the fact that they were hardy and they didn't
Speaker 1: take a lot of energy to move.
Speaker 4: You can buy something like that for four people, a
Speaker 4: Kevin for four people.
Speaker 1: You can buy them.
Speaker 4: They're they're people selling little zeppelins with cavins for four people.
Speaker 4: They have a problem any wind above seven kilometers an hour,
Speaker 4: and it doesn't work because the end and doesn't have
Speaker 4: the power to overcome the winds. So you are at
Speaker 4: the mercy of the currents. You don't know where you
Speaker 4: end up. That's that's the only problem. But they are
Speaker 4: they are available to buy. Yes, they are expensive.
Speaker 1: Of course, that's awesome. That's the way to go, though,
Speaker 1: you get one of those. I mean, you're talking about earthquakes,
Speaker 1: you're talking about tsunami.
Speaker 2: And you can go fly over anonica, right, why not?
Speaker 2: That's great?
Speaker 1: Yeah, I never thought of that. I thought about a balloon,
Speaker 1: but then I thought about the winds. But balloons are
Speaker 1: tough because I mean, it doesn't take much of a
Speaker 1: puncture and you know, it's not all self contained. But
Speaker 1: you know, a zeppelin, that's the way to go.
Speaker 2: Man, Yo, do you ever see some of those raves
Speaker 2: done in balloons? Now? I should you not that I
Speaker 2: should you not, as you sound crazy.
Speaker 5: I've I've literally seen it where the DJ will go
Speaker 5: up in a balloon.
Speaker 2: It must be astronomical. It must be just rich people
Speaker 2: going to it.
Speaker 5: And then people who are in all the balloons they
Speaker 5: all left up and this DJ and they will just
Speaker 5: sit up there and listen to this guy do a
Speaker 5: set up in hide a balloons.
Speaker 1: Yeah, when the ground is boring, let's do it in
Speaker 1: the air.
Speaker 2: Rights watch those things. I'm like, what.
Speaker 1: You want to get possessed by the archives? If you're
Speaker 1: up in the air in a rave, you're talking about
Speaker 1: serious interference.
Speaker 5: It's like, what do you want to when you want
Speaker 5: to know, like the families of the people that are
Speaker 5: ruling the world, go check out the kids that are
Speaker 5: sitting in those fucking balloons watching a DJ.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 1: Too much money, too much time, and little things in
Speaker 1: the head.
Speaker 5: Absolutely, Yeah, I think I'm gonna wrap it up, only
Speaker 5: because unfortunately we do have another show today.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 5: I would have loved to have kept going, but definitely
Speaker 5: have you back on again, Ricardo, and I would love
Speaker 5: you to actually talk on one of your books for real.
Speaker 2: And yeah, I've had all these people on, all these authors, aren't.
Speaker 5: I need to get you on as well, so we'll
Speaker 5: definitely make that happen. Hill Liss, thank you again so
Speaker 5: much for joining us, and let everybody know where they
Speaker 5: can find your stuff again.
Speaker 1: You can find me at the Headless Giant on YouTube.
Speaker 1: I'm on x Schitzo posting and you can also send
Speaker 1: your emails to me at Headless Giant Podcast at gmail
Speaker 1: dot com. If you've got an interesting story, some sort
Speaker 1: of metaphysical paranormal thing happening to you, I want to
Speaker 1: know about it.
Speaker 5: Yes, definitely send it over and Ricardo, sir, Please remind
Speaker 5: everybody where they can find all your stuff.
Speaker 4: Sure, they can find me mostly on x as Ricardo
Speaker 4: Carvalu at the d of Ricardo Calvary one. They can
Speaker 4: find my videos at History Meets and Legends. They can
Speaker 4: find descriptions of books at resin. Well, how do you
Speaker 4: say a resin of a book?
Speaker 2: Resume?
Speaker 5: Oh, I know what you're talking about.
Speaker 2: Wow, I can't remember.
Speaker 4: Summary summary of books in a channel called cashik Records
Speaker 4: that have some rare books. They are being described that
Speaker 4: it's too boring for you to read. Perhaps, so you
Speaker 4: have a summary of the books there. And you can
Speaker 4: have a look at our magazine pharr Us going to
Speaker 4: Institute for Natural Philosophy dot org. Check the magazine is
Speaker 4: free per download.
Speaker 1: And that's probably it. Get my books start us and resonancers.
Speaker 2: Awesome, thank you.
Speaker 1: I need the support. So that's the way. That's a
Speaker 1: good way to support me and getting something in return,
Speaker 1: I hope awesome.
Speaker 5: Thank you, Oh, thank you very much, Ricardo. I really
Speaker 5: appreciate it. Definitely, I'll include his links. Please go check
Speaker 5: out all his stuff again, thank you, gentlemen. And that
Speaker 5: was the end.
Speaker 2: Of another called Rejects. And until the next one, everybody
Speaker 2: be well.