WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.080 --> 00:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>But I joined it. So apparently they had a rage

2
00:00:13.199 --> 00:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>quit or something. I don't know the details of what

3
00:00:15.320 --> 00:00:21.399
<v Speaker 1>all went down. Oh crap, I'm supposed to haven't than

4
00:00:21.519 --> 00:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>its supposed to be with Richard Grove right now. I

5
00:00:23.399 --> 00:00:41.759
<v Speaker 1>forgot about that. Uh So anyway, so I DM Sneako

6
00:00:41.840 --> 00:00:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that I'm in his thing. Let's see. He says, I

7
00:00:48.479 --> 00:00:54.039
<v Speaker 1>friended you. Uh friend requests.

8
00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Kahm.

9
00:01:09.079 --> 00:01:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Then I said, what about breakfast around here? Revenue is

10
00:01:13.079 --> 00:01:14.439
<v Speaker 3>ship I don't think.

11
00:01:14.359 --> 00:01:19.159
<v Speaker 1>I run huh.

12
00:01:19.719 --> 00:01:21.159
<v Speaker 4>We both kind of like it.

13
00:01:22.879 --> 00:01:39.640
<v Speaker 5>Bet on air air and air in a room there there, okay, yeah,

14
00:01:39.680 --> 00:01:40.359
<v Speaker 5>I added you.

15
00:01:41.799 --> 00:01:45.439
<v Speaker 1>The server set up where I don't see where they where.

16
00:01:45.439 --> 00:02:02.599
<v Speaker 6>The debate is waiting room uhh.

17
00:02:02.719 --> 00:02:19.800
<v Speaker 3>And I said, hood bye brain rest. I'm both kind

18
00:02:19.800 --> 00:02:20.240
<v Speaker 3>of lad.

19
00:02:23.919 --> 00:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm here, I said, yo, So what's up?

20
00:02:31.240 --> 00:02:32.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm a waiting.

21
00:02:34.240 --> 00:02:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Yo yo.

22
00:02:47.159 --> 00:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's in the religion section. Let's see. I still

23
00:02:49.560 --> 00:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>can't talk. I'm gonna beate on rumble. I thought the

24
00:02:56.080 --> 00:03:04.039
<v Speaker 1>debates in here, dude, h m hm, still making me wait.

25
00:03:06.520 --> 00:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You may not talk for four minutes. M Trinidad James

26
00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Gold all over my chain and go over my watch

27
00:03:50.159 --> 00:04:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and nonet believe he'll just watch. I guess the ten

28
00:04:01.199 --> 00:04:05.159
<v Speaker 1>minute rule is for bots or something, But I mean,

29
00:04:05.159 --> 00:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>how many bots are trying to join servers? I don't know.

30
00:04:07.800 --> 00:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he's got a bunch of haters. I don't know.

31
00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Stuart, thank you for that super jet.

32
00:04:18.439 --> 00:04:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Be careful. Snico and his.

33
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Friend pulled a fast one on Andrew when they change

34
00:04:22.519 --> 00:04:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the agreements of the debate. Well, I don't. I haven't

35
00:04:26.360 --> 00:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>agreed to anything other than to come into this room,

36
00:04:28.399 --> 00:04:31.199
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what the topics are. I'm not

37
00:04:31.279 --> 00:04:35.399
<v Speaker 1>debating this age of Ayisha stuff. That's not I'm a

38
00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I debate the philosophy stuff. So we're going to debate

39
00:04:39.439 --> 00:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>theology philosophy. I'm not here to debate all this degenerate,

40
00:04:44.160 --> 00:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>pre pubescent stuff. That's not what I That's not what

41
00:04:46.639 --> 00:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I do. Plenty of people can debate that topic. Still

42
00:05:04.279 --> 00:05:12.879
<v Speaker 1>making me wait to talk in the chat. So I mean, yeah,

43
00:05:12.879 --> 00:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't know who Muslim lantern is. So

44
00:05:15.839 --> 00:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what what's going on here. But

45
00:05:18.920 --> 00:05:23.079
<v Speaker 1>number one, I'm not afraid of doing these debates, obviously,

46
00:05:29.040 --> 00:05:32.519
<v Speaker 1>So Sneako's debate. Stop ducking. They're telling me I'm ducking.

47
00:05:32.519 --> 00:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I literally just.

48
00:05:35.800 --> 00:05:47.000
<v Speaker 4>Yo, hello, yo, hey, can you hear me?

49
00:05:47.199 --> 00:05:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? What's up?

50
00:05:49.160 --> 00:05:49.399
<v Speaker 4>Nice?

51
00:05:50.199 --> 00:05:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Hey?

52
00:05:51.439 --> 00:05:53.800
<v Speaker 4>How you guys doing doing good?

53
00:05:53.839 --> 00:05:55.879
<v Speaker 7>Doing good? So this is Muhammad Ali and then we

54
00:05:55.920 --> 00:05:58.680
<v Speaker 7>also have a fellow Christian, Jacosi here, a representative of

55
00:05:58.720 --> 00:06:01.800
<v Speaker 7>the Love Spech community. So we just had I'll keep

56
00:06:01.839 --> 00:06:04.079
<v Speaker 7>you up to just bring you up to speed. We

57
00:06:04.319 --> 00:06:07.720
<v Speaker 7>just had a half debate kind of Andrew Wilson versus

58
00:06:07.879 --> 00:06:11.160
<v Speaker 7>Muslim lantern. This Muhammad a live here, and we weren't

59
00:06:11.160 --> 00:06:13.279
<v Speaker 7>able to agree with to the terms of the Asia

60
00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:15.959
<v Speaker 7>concent but we do really want to hear about the Trinity.

61
00:06:16.120 --> 00:06:17.480
<v Speaker 7>If we could do a Trinity debate, I don't know

62
00:06:17.480 --> 00:06:18.639
<v Speaker 7>if you're if you're ready or if you want to

63
00:06:18.639 --> 00:06:20.920
<v Speaker 7>do that right now, but me and Dracosa, because he's

64
00:06:20.959 --> 00:06:23.120
<v Speaker 7>a Christian, I would be unbiased. We can moderate it

65
00:06:23.199 --> 00:06:25.519
<v Speaker 7>right now. You versus the Muslim lantern.

66
00:06:26.240 --> 00:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I'm not opposed to debating Trinity. I have

67
00:06:28.639 --> 00:06:30.879
<v Speaker 1>just debated for the last four hours, so I'm a

68
00:06:30.879 --> 00:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit tired, but I'm not opposed to doing it.

69
00:06:34.160 --> 00:06:37.720
<v Speaker 7>Okay, we can keep it short. I want to keep it.

70
00:06:37.879 --> 00:06:41.920
<v Speaker 7>How's forty five minutes. Let's we can start five Well,

71
00:06:41.959 --> 00:06:43.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean you don't have an opening statement prepared.

72
00:06:44.600 --> 00:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I do everything extemporaneous. I would, I mean, I would,

73
00:06:47.519 --> 00:06:50.519
<v Speaker 1>I can do an opening statement extemporaneous, doesn't matter. I mean,

74
00:06:50.759 --> 00:06:52.879
<v Speaker 1>did you want to do timed or a conversation or

75
00:06:52.879 --> 00:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>what style debate?

76
00:06:53.759 --> 00:06:55.839
<v Speaker 2>So that's listen to now.

77
00:06:55.920 --> 00:06:58.800
<v Speaker 7>Ideally, Okay, so I'll do the same terms that we

78
00:06:58.839 --> 00:07:01.120
<v Speaker 7>had for the last debate, but it went itself. So

79
00:07:01.720 --> 00:07:04.360
<v Speaker 7>I think having an opening statement for both sides would

80
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:07.399
<v Speaker 7>be fair around five minutes cap. We'll cap in five

81
00:07:07.439 --> 00:07:09.240
<v Speaker 7>minutes and then we can go free flowing back and forth.

82
00:07:09.279 --> 00:07:11.000
<v Speaker 7>But if there's too many interruptions, then we'll have to

83
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:13.360
<v Speaker 7>do timing things, and then that's when the moderators will

84
00:07:13.360 --> 00:07:13.879
<v Speaker 7>have to stuppen.

85
00:07:15.600 --> 00:07:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good idea. I can do that.

86
00:07:18.959 --> 00:07:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

87
00:07:19.199 --> 00:07:23.560
<v Speaker 8>So the thing is, like Andrew I was having a

88
00:07:23.600 --> 00:07:26.800
<v Speaker 8>discussion with him. He was wanted to talk about the

89
00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:29.160
<v Speaker 8>age of manager, of the age of consent right versus

90
00:07:29.439 --> 00:07:31.319
<v Speaker 8>the Trinity. So I don't know if you want to

91
00:07:31.319 --> 00:07:32.959
<v Speaker 8>mention something about it slam as well to be fair,

92
00:07:33.000 --> 00:07:35.480
<v Speaker 8>because talken just about the Trinity is just a Christian thing.

93
00:07:36.120 --> 00:07:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, I mean usually Trinity versus how heat is

94
00:07:38.399 --> 00:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what we debate.

95
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you have that.

96
00:07:40.560 --> 00:07:42.720
<v Speaker 8>So if you want to debate that, that's fine. And

97
00:07:42.759 --> 00:07:45.199
<v Speaker 8>you already debated that, so you should already have your

98
00:07:45.199 --> 00:07:47.560
<v Speaker 8>notes ready, I believe, right, because your last debate was

99
00:07:47.600 --> 00:07:48.480
<v Speaker 8>kind of I don't do.

100
00:07:48.519 --> 00:07:50.519
<v Speaker 1>Nutes, man, I just I just do everything eximper in

101
00:07:50.600 --> 00:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this I.

102
00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>No, no, I'm just making that point clear.

103
00:07:53.639 --> 00:07:56.439
<v Speaker 8>They've already had a debate on this topic just recently,

104
00:07:56.480 --> 00:07:58.800
<v Speaker 8>so if you did have notes, you would have them prepared,

105
00:07:58.839 --> 00:07:59.519
<v Speaker 8>so you can say that.

106
00:07:59.600 --> 00:08:02.160
<v Speaker 2>But something they've already done. Right, So we were having

107
00:08:02.199 --> 00:08:04.759
<v Speaker 2>a discussion, me and Andrew.

108
00:08:04.839 --> 00:08:06.480
<v Speaker 8>We can do that if we allow each other to speak,

109
00:08:06.519 --> 00:08:07.680
<v Speaker 8>finish the points and ask questions.

110
00:08:07.720 --> 00:08:09.279
<v Speaker 2>I think that can work with me and you.

111
00:08:09.360 --> 00:08:13.040
<v Speaker 8>If the moderators not the stage just becoming interrupting and

112
00:08:13.040 --> 00:08:14.879
<v Speaker 8>stuff like that, and someone's trying to take over, then

113
00:08:15.120 --> 00:08:18.000
<v Speaker 8>what we can do is just turn it into timing.

114
00:08:18.279 --> 00:08:22.639
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, it's be fair, all right. So, and I

115
00:08:22.680 --> 00:08:24.560
<v Speaker 2>made this and I don't think you will.

116
00:08:24.560 --> 00:08:27.120
<v Speaker 8>But I made this point before in the previous discussion,

117
00:08:27.240 --> 00:08:30.720
<v Speaker 8>is like, no insulting of the profit directly by mentioning,

118
00:08:30.720 --> 00:08:32.000
<v Speaker 8>calling him names and stuff like that.

119
00:08:32.080 --> 00:08:33.039
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you will do that.

120
00:08:33.799 --> 00:08:35.600
<v Speaker 8>But I'm just highlighting that because that's I guess it's

121
00:08:35.600 --> 00:08:37.559
<v Speaker 8>my faith. So I cannot be in the call if this,

122
00:08:37.759 --> 00:08:40.080
<v Speaker 8>if this is happening, If that's fair, you can let

123
00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:40.279
<v Speaker 8>me know.

124
00:08:40.279 --> 00:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>If not, you can also tin me in a position.

125
00:08:42.840 --> 00:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, do you have a camera. I mean

126
00:08:48.639 --> 00:08:51.759
<v Speaker 1>we're live on YouTube, so my camera as active for

127
00:08:51.799 --> 00:08:52.559
<v Speaker 1>YouTube right now?

128
00:08:53.679 --> 00:08:57.720
<v Speaker 7>Oh okay, okay, you can activate it on Discord two.

129
00:08:59.639 --> 00:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, one, I know.

130
00:09:04.080 --> 00:09:05.440
<v Speaker 7>Uh yeah. A lot of guys are used the stream

131
00:09:05.519 --> 00:09:27.320
<v Speaker 7>yard and stuff. H all right, yeah, listen, all right,

132
00:09:31.039 --> 00:09:34.480
<v Speaker 7>all right, okay, who would prefer to go first? As

133
00:09:34.480 --> 00:09:36.080
<v Speaker 7>a matter, I.

134
00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:37.919
<v Speaker 8>Don't mind you if you would like to. I don't

135
00:09:37.960 --> 00:09:39.559
<v Speaker 8>know you would like me to go first. We would

136
00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:40.200
<v Speaker 8>like to go first.

137
00:09:40.519 --> 00:09:41.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm a very.

138
00:09:43.080 --> 00:09:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Let me find a piece I need a piece of paper.

139
00:09:44.799 --> 00:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I always taking notes, so hold on, segain Okay.

140
00:09:49.720 --> 00:09:52.639
<v Speaker 7>They were complaining about the volume earlier, mohammed, your your

141
00:09:52.720 --> 00:09:54.519
<v Speaker 7>your volume is a little low. I had you all

142
00:09:54.559 --> 00:09:57.639
<v Speaker 7>the way up, but it's and then even at the

143
00:09:58.120 --> 00:10:00.840
<v Speaker 7>Christians something, No, it's a little low.

144
00:10:01.919 --> 00:10:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you could turn it up, but don't.

145
00:10:05.960 --> 00:10:07.759
<v Speaker 8>I think it's the loudest I can get it right now.

146
00:10:07.799 --> 00:10:12.200
<v Speaker 8>But I'm just also speaking. I'm not speaking loudly because

147
00:10:12.440 --> 00:10:16.399
<v Speaker 8>it's too am you know, right, Yeah, I mentioned to

148
00:10:16.399 --> 00:10:17.399
<v Speaker 8>you about the neighbors and stuff.

149
00:10:17.399 --> 00:10:19.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be waking them up or something.

150
00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, who's that?

151
00:10:38.320 --> 00:10:47.519
<v Speaker 7>Okay, this is a Trinity versus to Heat debate. Let's

152
00:10:47.519 --> 00:10:51.240
<v Speaker 7>get an opening statement from I'll sell with Jay.

153
00:10:51.799 --> 00:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Yeah, So, the doctrine in Trinity is a doctrine

154
00:10:54.720 --> 00:10:57.759
<v Speaker 1>that is not derived from philosophy. It's not derived from

155
00:10:57.799 --> 00:11:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Saint Paul primarily, it's not derived from the Council of Nicia.

156
00:11:01.360 --> 00:11:03.919
<v Speaker 1>The Doctor the Trinity is taught in the Law and

157
00:11:03.960 --> 00:11:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the Prophets. In fact, if you go back to my

158
00:11:06.399 --> 00:11:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Hikikachu debate, in the first ten minutes, I hold

159
00:11:09.240 --> 00:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>up a whiteboard that shows all the passages from the

160
00:11:12.399 --> 00:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Torah and then the prophets that we derived the Doctrine

161
00:11:15.159 --> 00:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity from, mainly from Jewish Extejesus of the Old Testament.

162
00:11:20.360 --> 00:11:22.919
<v Speaker 1>This might sound surprising because people think that the doctor

163
00:11:22.960 --> 00:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in Trinity is something that's unique to Christianity, or that

164
00:11:25.519 --> 00:11:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Jews don't believe in this nowadays, so therefore Jews could

165
00:11:29.279 --> 00:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>not have taught it back then. In fact, many Jewish

166
00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:34.279
<v Speaker 1>scholars today. I reference many of those in that opening

167
00:11:34.279 --> 00:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>statement of the Daniel debate. I can refer to them now.

168
00:11:36.759 --> 00:11:41.759
<v Speaker 1>This would be Benjamin Summer, Alan Siegel, Schaeffer, etc. Boyar,

169
00:11:41.879 --> 00:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and all of those scholars admit that the early Church's

170
00:11:45.360 --> 00:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>view is not that distinct from the Judaism of the

171
00:11:48.600 --> 00:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>time of Christ in recognizing more than one person in

172
00:11:52.399 --> 00:11:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity. Note, I am not saying that the Jews

173
00:11:55.759 --> 00:12:01.279
<v Speaker 1>at that time were all Trinitarians. I'm not saying that

174
00:12:01.720 --> 00:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>it's okay. I'm not saying that Jews necessarily accept Trinitarianism.

175
00:12:05.679 --> 00:12:08.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that these scholars prove that in the time

176
00:12:08.960 --> 00:12:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of Christ, there was not a generic Unitarianism that characterized

177
00:12:12.919 --> 00:12:15.159
<v Speaker 1>what it is to be quote monotheists. They didn't see

178
00:12:15.200 --> 00:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a contradiction or a problem between the idea of quote

179
00:12:18.039 --> 00:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>monotheism and the recognition of the Father as the archae

180
00:12:21.720 --> 00:12:24.279
<v Speaker 1>cause and fount, the Angel of the Lord as his messenger,

181
00:12:24.320 --> 00:12:25.919
<v Speaker 1>which we see through all throughout the Old Testament, who

182
00:12:26.000 --> 00:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is called God, who is called Divine, who is called

183
00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the Messenger of the Covenant, who is called Yahweh in

184
00:12:31.879 --> 00:12:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Exodus three, Exodus twenty three throughout the Psalms, in the

185
00:12:34.840 --> 00:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Mini Theophanes passages, and many times in the Prophets, Jesus predicted,

186
00:12:38.879 --> 00:12:41.639
<v Speaker 1>especially in latter Isaiah, to be a divine Nosiah that

187
00:12:41.639 --> 00:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>would be worshiped. So a lot of these references to

188
00:12:44.600 --> 00:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity are primarily grounded rooted in the Torah and

189
00:12:48.240 --> 00:12:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the Prophets. Islam, However, when it argues against the Trinity,

190
00:12:53.120 --> 00:12:55.519
<v Speaker 1>does so on the basis of it not being aware

191
00:12:55.559 --> 00:12:57.759
<v Speaker 1>of or not being informed, typically on what the actual

192
00:12:57.840 --> 00:13:01.279
<v Speaker 1>texts teach in terms of the Jewish texts that we

193
00:13:01.320 --> 00:13:04.159
<v Speaker 1>as Christians also refer to. Also when it comes to

194
00:13:04.200 --> 00:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the text of the Gospel and the texts of the

195
00:13:07.039 --> 00:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>New Testament, they're not aware of the fact that Jesus,

196
00:13:10.200 --> 00:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Gospel John and every chapter refers to himself

197
00:13:13.120 --> 00:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as both divine and or a member of the triad.

198
00:13:16.080 --> 00:13:18.919
<v Speaker 1>John one talks about Jesus being the Logos. John one

199
00:13:18.960 --> 00:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>talks about him being eternally begotten monogyen aesteos, so the

200
00:13:22.679 --> 00:13:24.799
<v Speaker 1>eternal beginning. All of that is already at the beginning

201
00:13:24.799 --> 00:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Gospel John and again every chapter, whether it's

202
00:13:27.279 --> 00:13:29.679
<v Speaker 1>John five through nine, where Jesus identifies himself as the

203
00:13:29.720 --> 00:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>one at Mount Sinai talking to Moses, the one that

204
00:13:32.039 --> 00:13:34.159
<v Speaker 1>gave the law. Jesus firs to himself as the son

205
00:13:34.200 --> 00:13:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of God many times over, which means that his God

206
00:13:36.399 --> 00:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is not Allah, because Allah has no sons. So Jesus

207
00:13:39.519 --> 00:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>many many times over throughout the Gospel says he is

208
00:13:41.519 --> 00:13:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the son of God and that he makes us by

209
00:13:43.279 --> 00:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>grace sons of God. This proves that there is not

210
00:13:45.879 --> 00:13:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the same God of Muhammad and the same God of Jesus.

211
00:13:49.399 --> 00:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Jesus is not referring to Allah as his father. Allah

212
00:13:52.759 --> 00:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>has no sons. So when we come to the time

213
00:13:55.919 --> 00:13:58.799
<v Speaker 1>of the early church fathers, they unanimously teach the deedy

214
00:13:58.799 --> 00:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of Christ, the triad, as well the deed to the

215
00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Holy Spirit. This becomes codified by the time of Nicia.

216
00:14:04.159 --> 00:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not invented at the time of Nicia. You can

217
00:14:06.279 --> 00:14:09.519
<v Speaker 1>read the church fathers from Irenaeus to Ignacious to Clement.

218
00:14:09.799 --> 00:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>You can read Cyril, sip Schimi, Cyprian, you can read Athanasius,

219
00:14:13.759 --> 00:14:16.399
<v Speaker 1>all these church fathers. Alexander writing prior to the time,

220
00:14:16.440 --> 00:14:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and I see that teach the deed to Christ and

221
00:14:18.399 --> 00:14:20.159
<v Speaker 1>what would become the doction or known as the Doctor

222
00:14:20.200 --> 00:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>with trinity. So the Trinity is not something foreign to

223
00:14:22.519 --> 00:14:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the scriptures. It's rooted in the Torret's rooted in the Prophet's,

224
00:14:24.759 --> 00:14:26.039
<v Speaker 1>root in the New Testament, root in the teaching of

225
00:14:26.080 --> 00:14:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Christ himself. And I would add that when we compare

226
00:14:29.080 --> 00:14:31.679
<v Speaker 1>it to what's in the Quran, the Koran makes many stakes.

227
00:14:31.679 --> 00:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>First of all, about what the Christians teach. They say

228
00:14:34.360 --> 00:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that we take our monks as lords. We do not.

229
00:14:36.399 --> 00:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>They take They think that the Koran thinks that we

230
00:14:39.000 --> 00:14:40.759
<v Speaker 1>take Mary as part of the Trinity, we do not.

231
00:14:41.360 --> 00:14:44.639
<v Speaker 1>The Qoran also is itself confused in two areas that

232
00:14:44.679 --> 00:14:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I always like to highlight, which is that it claims

233
00:14:46.799 --> 00:14:49.799
<v Speaker 1>that prior revelation confirms it and backs it up and

234
00:14:49.879 --> 00:14:52.759
<v Speaker 1>many times over, Like in a so five, it says

235
00:14:52.759 --> 00:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that you can look to the previous revelation to confirm

236
00:14:54.840 --> 00:14:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the new revelation, but the old revelation contradicts it. And

237
00:14:57.720 --> 00:15:00.399
<v Speaker 1>when Muslims see the contradictions, they do the same move

238
00:15:00.440 --> 00:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of Ajaws and the debate to say, well, we reject

239
00:15:03.639 --> 00:15:05.639
<v Speaker 1>all the times that it contradicts, but we accept all

240
00:15:05.639 --> 00:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the time that it is with our revelation. Well, that

241
00:15:08.200 --> 00:15:12.039
<v Speaker 1>is a circle. That's arguing for the thing that's in question,

242
00:15:12.159 --> 00:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we want to know, how does the prior revelation confirm

243
00:15:15.120 --> 00:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the new revelation, which the Quran says it can do

244
00:15:18.639 --> 00:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>if the prior revelations are corrupt, and how a foolish

245
00:15:21.440 --> 00:15:23.159
<v Speaker 1>it would be to look to a corrupt book to

246
00:15:23.679 --> 00:15:26.279
<v Speaker 1>supposedly prove an incorrupt book. So it makes no sense

247
00:15:26.320 --> 00:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on the face of it. I would also then argue

248
00:15:28.600 --> 00:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that the doctrine of Tanzi that's derived from the passages

249
00:15:32.120 --> 00:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that talk about all of being nothing like creation forty

250
00:15:34.360 --> 00:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>two and I think around one ten somewhere in there

251
00:15:37.240 --> 00:15:39.679
<v Speaker 1>it says that Allah is absolutely nothing like creation. And

252
00:15:39.720 --> 00:15:42.559
<v Speaker 1>yet Muslims many times over will utilize terminology, language and

253
00:15:42.639 --> 00:15:45.879
<v Speaker 1>so forth to liken Allah to a created thing, to

254
00:15:45.919 --> 00:15:47.879
<v Speaker 1>say that Allah is merciful, that he is just, he

255
00:15:47.919 --> 00:15:50.679
<v Speaker 1>has all these things, Allah has a hand, has a shen,

256
00:15:50.799 --> 00:15:54.039
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. Things that come up in the accepted

257
00:15:54.720 --> 00:15:57.279
<v Speaker 1>hadeds well, all of those things are contradictory to the

258
00:15:57.320 --> 00:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>notion of taal Heed that God is a pure unity

259
00:15:59.679 --> 00:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or pure This is why Muslims for centuries have debated

260
00:16:02.000 --> 00:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>amongst themselves whether the attributes are really distinct. And you

261
00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>have people like Jake Slafis and others who say, no, oh, yes,

262
00:16:08.480 --> 00:16:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Allah has a foot, has a shin, and we don't

263
00:16:09.960 --> 00:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>know the modality, but he really has these things.

264
00:16:11.519 --> 00:16:12.360
<v Speaker 3>They're really attributes.

265
00:16:12.720 --> 00:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet we're said to be only a religion of

266
00:16:16.039 --> 00:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>perfect unity and perfect oneness. Yet he's many. Well, the

267
00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>same problem that you have with the attributes and the

268
00:16:22.159 --> 00:16:25.279
<v Speaker 1>dependence relationship of the attributes on Allah's essence and amongst

269
00:16:25.279 --> 00:16:27.559
<v Speaker 1>themselves is no different than the question that we have

270
00:16:27.639 --> 00:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>about the persons of the trinity. It's just simply that

271
00:16:29.799 --> 00:16:31.559
<v Speaker 1>you say that we have a problem that you don't

272
00:16:31.559 --> 00:16:33.759
<v Speaker 1>have to answer when you have the exact same problem

273
00:16:34.120 --> 00:16:37.559
<v Speaker 1>in relationship to the attributes in Allah's essence and their

274
00:16:37.600 --> 00:16:40.919
<v Speaker 1>dependent's relationship. And if you don't think there's a dependence relationship,

275
00:16:41.000 --> 00:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>then I will just simply say, do you believe that

276
00:16:42.440 --> 00:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they are then asse or self existent? If they're self existent,

277
00:16:45.399 --> 00:16:48.399
<v Speaker 1>then you have what ninety nine gods. So you have

278
00:16:48.440 --> 00:16:51.679
<v Speaker 1>the same problem, but a double standard as to how

279
00:16:51.720 --> 00:16:54.279
<v Speaker 1>you answer that. I'm not saying note that you believe

280
00:16:54.440 --> 00:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that the attributes of persons. I know you don't believe that,

281
00:16:57.440 --> 00:16:59.639
<v Speaker 1>But the same problem of the one and the many

282
00:17:00.039 --> 00:17:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and the dependence status between the attributes and the essence

283
00:17:03.440 --> 00:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is a problem that you cannot answer because within Islam

284
00:17:06.240 --> 00:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there are countless multiple contradictions. How much time do I have?

285
00:17:10.599 --> 00:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>You're good?

286
00:17:10.960 --> 00:17:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I can give you a specific time.

287
00:17:13.200 --> 00:17:13.319
<v Speaker 4>Good.

288
00:17:13.440 --> 00:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought he said five minute opening or whatever.

289
00:17:16.960 --> 00:17:17.359
<v Speaker 9>That was good.

290
00:17:17.359 --> 00:17:21.960
<v Speaker 7>That was precise. I think that's fine. You want to

291
00:17:21.960 --> 00:17:23.200
<v Speaker 7>respond with some antern.

292
00:17:24.160 --> 00:17:25.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay.

293
00:17:25.559 --> 00:17:27.880
<v Speaker 8>During my response, I want to ask you questions, if

294
00:17:27.920 --> 00:17:29.720
<v Speaker 8>that's fine, right, I just want to ask The first

295
00:17:29.759 --> 00:17:30.559
<v Speaker 8>question is what is.

296
00:17:30.559 --> 00:17:32.799
<v Speaker 2>The trinity in your belief? What is the trinity?

297
00:17:32.920 --> 00:17:34.440
<v Speaker 8>Just because we're talking about the trinity, so I think

298
00:17:34.480 --> 00:17:36.799
<v Speaker 8>defining terms is appointed because you said you found it

299
00:17:36.839 --> 00:17:37.759
<v Speaker 8>present in the old systems.

300
00:17:37.759 --> 00:17:38.559
<v Speaker 2>So why is the trinity?

301
00:17:39.640 --> 00:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So doctrine that God is first and foremost identified with

302
00:17:42.839 --> 00:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the person of the Father. The Father is what we

303
00:17:45.480 --> 00:17:49.559
<v Speaker 1>call the arkaeount, the source, the cause, the supreme beginning

304
00:17:49.759 --> 00:17:53.519
<v Speaker 1>of the other two persons, and that's revealed to be

305
00:17:53.599 --> 00:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the person of his eternally begotten son, who identify as

306
00:17:57.000 --> 00:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Lord Jesus Christ, and with his eternal Holy Spirit.

307
00:18:00.559 --> 00:18:03.559
<v Speaker 1>So they are three in one. They share a common

308
00:18:03.640 --> 00:18:06.720
<v Speaker 1>essence or nature in that they come from the Father,

309
00:18:06.839 --> 00:18:09.279
<v Speaker 1>and they derive the same nature from the Father, as

310
00:18:09.359 --> 00:18:12.039
<v Speaker 1>Jesus says in John five and six. But they're also

311
00:18:12.160 --> 00:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>really and truly distinct, which is why we see Jesus,

312
00:18:14.400 --> 00:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>for example, praying to the Father, asking things of the Father,

313
00:18:17.400 --> 00:18:19.839
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So the Bible, we believe, teaches both

314
00:18:19.880 --> 00:18:22.039
<v Speaker 1>of those things that he is one and three. And

315
00:18:22.079 --> 00:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a problem for monotheism because actually the word

316
00:18:25.000 --> 00:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>monotheism is a really late term that you don't see

317
00:18:27.400 --> 00:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>until the sixteen hundreds.

318
00:18:29.839 --> 00:18:32.519
<v Speaker 8>So I'm sorry I didn't get a definition, but I'll

319
00:18:32.519 --> 00:18:35.160
<v Speaker 8>give a definition and then you can confirm with me.

320
00:18:35.240 --> 00:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>You said few things.

321
00:18:36.039 --> 00:18:38.640
<v Speaker 8>I understand them, but I wanted like a concise definition.

322
00:18:38.720 --> 00:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Right.

323
00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:41.200
<v Speaker 2>You tell me whether this is like represented as the.

324
00:18:41.240 --> 00:18:41.799
<v Speaker 4>Trinity or not.

325
00:18:42.400 --> 00:18:45.279
<v Speaker 8>You have God, the Father, God, the Son, God, the

326
00:18:45.279 --> 00:18:48.599
<v Speaker 8>Hot Spirit. Okay, Father is not the Son's Son, is

327
00:18:48.640 --> 00:18:52.759
<v Speaker 8>not the Holy Spirit. Three persons in one being as

328
00:18:52.839 --> 00:18:55.720
<v Speaker 8>as one being, but there's three persons that are within

329
00:18:55.799 --> 00:18:57.480
<v Speaker 8>that one being, and.

330
00:18:59.400 --> 00:19:01.839
<v Speaker 2>The quote equal coote eternal, so.

331
00:19:01.759 --> 00:19:05.559
<v Speaker 8>They share they are equal in everything and they're eternal

332
00:19:05.680 --> 00:19:08.119
<v Speaker 8>the same way. Is that a good representation of for

333
00:19:08.200 --> 00:19:09.200
<v Speaker 8>the train, Well.

334
00:19:09.440 --> 00:19:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Some of that terminology is a little ambiguous, which is

335
00:19:11.799 --> 00:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>why I gave you a specific monarchical trinitarian definition. So

336
00:19:15.279 --> 00:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the model that I gave you was a definition. It's

337
00:19:17.640 --> 00:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>called monarchical trinitarianism, and it's distinct from a lot of

338
00:19:20.759 --> 00:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Western trinitarian theology that you might find in Romatholicism. So

339
00:19:24.440 --> 00:19:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I was being very precise in the response that.

340
00:19:26.759 --> 00:19:28.440
<v Speaker 7>I gave no.

341
00:19:28.440 --> 00:19:30.079
<v Speaker 8>No, but do you agree You have not told me

342
00:19:30.119 --> 00:19:32.799
<v Speaker 8>do you agree that if you say something is ambiguous?

343
00:19:32.799 --> 00:19:34.759
<v Speaker 8>You can tell me that this specific part is I

344
00:19:34.759 --> 00:19:36.519
<v Speaker 8>don't agree with it is ambiguous, and then you can

345
00:19:36.559 --> 00:19:39.079
<v Speaker 8>clarify it. What I've said is that the definition of

346
00:19:39.079 --> 00:19:41.079
<v Speaker 8>the trinity or not. I just want a concise definition.

347
00:19:41.759 --> 00:19:43.599
<v Speaker 8>Is it that there are three persons in one being

348
00:19:43.599 --> 00:19:46.200
<v Speaker 8>the quote equal quote external and they're not the same,

349
00:19:46.279 --> 00:19:47.880
<v Speaker 8>like the Father's not the Sun sentits on the horstrait,

350
00:19:47.920 --> 00:19:49.319
<v Speaker 8>but they won't God sure.

351
00:19:49.160 --> 00:19:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Very simple way. Do you agree with that? Okay?

352
00:19:50.960 --> 00:19:54.039
<v Speaker 8>So, because this is how I see people, anyone who've

353
00:19:54.039 --> 00:19:55.680
<v Speaker 8>seen define the trinity define it that way.

354
00:19:55.720 --> 00:19:57.880
<v Speaker 2>So I just wanted the agreement to that. Okay.

355
00:19:57.920 --> 00:20:00.559
<v Speaker 8>So that's the trinity. Now you quote it, John one,

356
00:20:00.640 --> 00:20:02.920
<v Speaker 8>and you tried to say that the scripture shows the trinity,

357
00:20:02.960 --> 00:20:05.480
<v Speaker 8>et cetera. Quoting John one is not an evidence for

358
00:20:05.519 --> 00:20:07.559
<v Speaker 8>the trinity. A trinity says three persons in one be

359
00:20:07.960 --> 00:20:10.440
<v Speaker 8>person is separate from the being. John one doesn't say that, says,

360
00:20:10.440 --> 00:20:12.400
<v Speaker 8>in the beginning was the word, the word was with God,

361
00:20:12.920 --> 00:20:15.319
<v Speaker 8>and the word was with God, was God? The word

362
00:20:15.319 --> 00:20:17.279
<v Speaker 8>became flush of mangol monas. If this is what you're

363
00:20:17.279 --> 00:20:19.400
<v Speaker 8>referring to, that's not three persons in one being there.

364
00:20:19.880 --> 00:20:21.759
<v Speaker 8>It does not talk about the fact that they are

365
00:20:21.799 --> 00:20:22.599
<v Speaker 8>distinct persons.

366
00:20:22.599 --> 00:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't say that.

367
00:20:23.960 --> 00:20:24.200
<v Speaker 4>John.

368
00:20:25.559 --> 00:20:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I didn't my it's my it's my time.

369
00:20:28.119 --> 00:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>You said you wanted conversation. You didn't say you want no, no, no,

370
00:20:31.720 --> 00:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>no no.

371
00:20:32.000 --> 00:20:33.839
<v Speaker 8>I said, I'll ask you a question with him my time.

372
00:20:34.279 --> 00:20:36.160
<v Speaker 8>Because you've made many points, I have to respond to

373
00:20:36.200 --> 00:20:37.279
<v Speaker 8>the well.

374
00:20:37.359 --> 00:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't say that the trinity is three persons

375
00:20:39.680 --> 00:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in John one, I said.

376
00:20:40.720 --> 00:20:43.640
<v Speaker 2>That, Okay, you said many things that I disagreed with

377
00:20:43.680 --> 00:20:43.960
<v Speaker 2>as well.

378
00:20:44.039 --> 00:20:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but what you're saying is a strong man. That

379
00:20:45.839 --> 00:20:46.599
<v Speaker 1>wasn't what I said.

380
00:20:46.680 --> 00:20:48.519
<v Speaker 8>No, no, we'll we'll have it back and forth after

381
00:20:48.559 --> 00:20:50.039
<v Speaker 8>I'm done. But I did allowed to speak for like

382
00:20:50.079 --> 00:20:51.200
<v Speaker 8>five minutes and make so many points.

383
00:20:51.839 --> 00:20:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So the back and forth is only when you ask

384
00:20:54.000 --> 00:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a question. I'm confused. You don't want a five minute open.

385
00:20:56.680 --> 00:20:57.680
<v Speaker 3>I thought you want a five open.

386
00:20:58.920 --> 00:21:00.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I have an opening statement.

387
00:21:00.359 --> 00:21:02.640
<v Speaker 8>I'm saying, within my opening statement, I'll ask you questions

388
00:21:02.640 --> 00:21:03.359
<v Speaker 8>for clarification.

389
00:21:03.400 --> 00:21:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

390
00:21:03.759 --> 00:21:05.640
<v Speaker 8>So you responded to the question, and the question was

391
00:21:05.680 --> 00:21:07.480
<v Speaker 8>what is the trinity? Because it's the debate of the topic,

392
00:21:07.519 --> 00:21:10.039
<v Speaker 8>that's it. So I needed the clarification of that. But

393
00:21:10.039 --> 00:21:11.880
<v Speaker 8>but other than that, I wanted to finish as well,

394
00:21:11.880 --> 00:21:14.039
<v Speaker 8>responding to all the points that you made, right, and

395
00:21:14.079 --> 00:21:15.960
<v Speaker 8>then we can get into back and forth on problem.

396
00:21:15.960 --> 00:21:17.680
<v Speaker 8>I don't mind, but I got to respond because you

397
00:21:17.720 --> 00:21:18.680
<v Speaker 8>made so many points, right.

398
00:21:20.119 --> 00:21:25.559
<v Speaker 7>Continue? Does that sound okay for both sides? Okay? Would

399
00:21:25.640 --> 00:21:28.319
<v Speaker 7>say that you know with your with your question there

400
00:21:28.880 --> 00:21:30.839
<v Speaker 7>why you were speaking and kind of gave the impression

401
00:21:30.880 --> 00:21:32.960
<v Speaker 7>that you were looking for back and forth, right, because

402
00:21:32.960 --> 00:21:33.440
<v Speaker 7>if he's.

403
00:21:33.319 --> 00:21:36.480
<v Speaker 8>Going to clarify, you know, a question, he had to

404
00:21:36.559 --> 00:21:38.079
<v Speaker 8>fully clarify that.

405
00:21:38.240 --> 00:21:40.720
<v Speaker 7>You understand that he wasn't really done with the clarification,

406
00:21:41.160 --> 00:21:41.920
<v Speaker 7>is what I no.

407
00:21:41.799 --> 00:21:44.319
<v Speaker 8>No, no, we passed from the point of the trinity.

408
00:21:44.400 --> 00:21:46.559
<v Speaker 8>He nodded his head this is a trinity, and then

409
00:21:46.599 --> 00:21:48.839
<v Speaker 8>I went to something else and then he said I did.

410
00:21:48.920 --> 00:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I'm supposed to know when yeah, okay.

411
00:21:52.119 --> 00:21:53.880
<v Speaker 8>No, no, just a question. I'll ask for example, is

412
00:21:53.880 --> 00:21:56.480
<v Speaker 8>the trinity? You give response? And that's it, Like that's

413
00:21:56.559 --> 00:21:58.799
<v Speaker 8>all I wanted. I didn't want like everything I all

414
00:21:58.839 --> 00:22:00.440
<v Speaker 8>mentioned and then you will come up. It's not going

415
00:22:00.440 --> 00:22:01.279
<v Speaker 8>to be an opening statement.

416
00:22:01.359 --> 00:22:01.559
<v Speaker 4>Right.

417
00:22:02.039 --> 00:22:04.759
<v Speaker 2>So you said that church fathers were unified on the

418
00:22:04.799 --> 00:22:07.319
<v Speaker 2>idea of the trinity. That's that is false. I have

419
00:22:07.400 --> 00:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>got many examples.

420
00:22:09.400 --> 00:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>There's just another strong man.

421
00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:14.599
<v Speaker 8>Okay, but I'm not going to be able to talk

422
00:22:14.680 --> 00:22:15.920
<v Speaker 8>if you everything I say that.

423
00:22:15.920 --> 00:22:17.960
<v Speaker 3>You're so I can't rely can.

424
00:22:17.799 --> 00:22:19.640
<v Speaker 8>When we get can, when we get can, when we can,

425
00:22:19.680 --> 00:22:22.039
<v Speaker 8>you write down what you believe. I'm strong manning you end,

426
00:22:22.920 --> 00:22:24.960
<v Speaker 8>and then we can have an open discussion about that

427
00:22:24.960 --> 00:22:31.200
<v Speaker 8>one sometime with opening Okay, that fine, Okay, clarify you

428
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:32.720
<v Speaker 8>what you meant, what you said about the church brothers.

429
00:22:32.759 --> 00:22:34.279
<v Speaker 2>What did you say about the church bathers?

430
00:22:34.920 --> 00:22:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, So it's a fallacy of ambiguity to say that

431
00:22:38.240 --> 00:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean that they don't have debate. I said that

432
00:22:40.720 --> 00:22:43.599
<v Speaker 1>they're unified on teaching the three persons and that there

433
00:22:43.680 --> 00:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>is the duty of Christ. They do teach those things.

434
00:22:45.359 --> 00:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>They also have debates on these topics too.

435
00:22:49.160 --> 00:22:51.559
<v Speaker 2>They have a unified agreement on what the trinity is.

436
00:22:52.480 --> 00:22:53.319
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I said.

437
00:22:54.240 --> 00:22:56.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good, So we have that established that the church

438
00:22:56.759 --> 00:22:57.680
<v Speaker 2>brothers don't.

439
00:22:57.400 --> 00:23:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Agree, No, not agree with twist what I okay, I'm

440
00:23:01.759 --> 00:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>asking is there a unified teaching of unity in a law? No,

441
00:23:04.599 --> 00:23:06.559
<v Speaker 1>so there's debate over it. You know that. So you're

442
00:23:06.559 --> 00:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to pin me into saying something I'm not saying.

443
00:23:09.359 --> 00:23:11.279
<v Speaker 2>That's not my questions.

444
00:23:10.559 --> 00:23:14.799
<v Speaker 1>You it's called a fallacy, Then it's a fallacy. Then

445
00:23:15.160 --> 00:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>do you know what that is? Okay, that's what the

446
00:23:20.440 --> 00:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>fallacy is, making a simple question for a complex response.

447
00:23:24.720 --> 00:23:26.960
<v Speaker 2>That's that's the problem always in questions like allow.

448
00:23:27.240 --> 00:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That we know fallacy.

449
00:23:28.440 --> 00:23:31.279
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem I'm asking. I'm asking a simple question.

450
00:23:31.960 --> 00:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the fallacy position. That's the fallacy is that it

451
00:23:34.960 --> 00:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>requires a complex response.

452
00:23:36.519 --> 00:23:38.519
<v Speaker 2>Questions that fallacy, I asked, It.

453
00:23:38.559 --> 00:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Is a fallacy. You don't even know that this is

454
00:23:40.759 --> 00:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a fallacy.

455
00:23:41.200 --> 00:23:44.440
<v Speaker 8>You finished the question and stop interrupting. I asked a

456
00:23:44.480 --> 00:23:46.680
<v Speaker 8>simple question. You can say yes or no. You can

457
00:23:46.680 --> 00:23:48.640
<v Speaker 8>say that's a fallacy. That is a fallacy, and can

458
00:23:48.640 --> 00:23:51.759
<v Speaker 8>make it, can make a judgment. I asked a simple question.

459
00:23:51.880 --> 00:23:53.960
<v Speaker 8>Did the church fathers have an agreed These.

460
00:23:53.920 --> 00:23:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Trips might work on your audience, they don't work over here.

461
00:23:57.119 --> 00:23:59.519
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so you're just this is how Christians are always

462
00:23:59.519 --> 00:24:00.559
<v Speaker 8>We try to have questions.

463
00:24:00.960 --> 00:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You you create a complex question fallacy and make it

464
00:24:05.440 --> 00:24:07.079
<v Speaker 1>an either or. That's why you keep saying it's a

465
00:24:07.079 --> 00:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>simple question, not a simple question. It's a difficult question.

466
00:24:10.319 --> 00:24:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Look you, is it a simple question about Allah and

467
00:24:12.799 --> 00:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>his attributes?

468
00:24:13.440 --> 00:24:14.319
<v Speaker 3>Is that a simple question?

469
00:24:14.880 --> 00:24:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, it's simple.

470
00:24:16.559 --> 00:24:18.559
<v Speaker 3>So there's not debates amongst the aqdas on that.

471
00:24:19.720 --> 00:24:21.519
<v Speaker 2>It is a simple question and I'm going to respond

472
00:24:21.559 --> 00:24:21.720
<v Speaker 2>to it.

473
00:24:21.799 --> 00:24:23.640
<v Speaker 3>But it's not a simple question, you know.

474
00:24:25.000 --> 00:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so what's the relationship volition?

475
00:24:27.519 --> 00:24:29.799
<v Speaker 8>It's not going to worry. Okay, you're interrupting, and this

476
00:24:29.880 --> 00:24:30.720
<v Speaker 8>is not how this question.

477
00:24:30.599 --> 00:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Is just because you're playing, You're you're erecting. False is

478
00:24:37.240 --> 00:24:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a false either or a fallacy? Is that a fallacy?

479
00:24:41.319 --> 00:24:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Is a false either or fallacy?

480
00:24:43.559 --> 00:24:45.200
<v Speaker 8>If the mother answers are not going to enjoy it,

481
00:24:45.440 --> 00:24:48.440
<v Speaker 8>so you won't answer, no, I can speak of my

482
00:24:48.519 --> 00:24:51.240
<v Speaker 8>opening statement about you asking me questions. It's my opening statement,

483
00:24:51.279 --> 00:24:51.720
<v Speaker 8>not yours.

484
00:24:52.519 --> 00:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You opened your statement asking questions playing games. Dude, Come on, okay,

485
00:24:58.640 --> 00:24:59.079
<v Speaker 1>how about this.

486
00:24:59.160 --> 00:25:01.680
<v Speaker 7>How can you ask the question? And because Jay is

487
00:25:01.680 --> 00:25:05.240
<v Speaker 7>saying that it's a complicated question, can you respond to it?

488
00:25:05.519 --> 00:25:07.400
<v Speaker 7>And under a minute you can ask a question again

489
00:25:07.480 --> 00:25:09.319
<v Speaker 7>it's complicated. You can have a minute to respond to

490
00:25:09.359 --> 00:25:09.680
<v Speaker 7>the question.

491
00:25:09.720 --> 00:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>That's fair.

492
00:25:10.640 --> 00:25:10.799
<v Speaker 2>No.

493
00:25:10.839 --> 00:25:12.759
<v Speaker 8>Look, look, I'm not going to ask him any questions

494
00:25:12.759 --> 00:25:14.519
<v Speaker 8>because what he's trying to do is just waste time.

495
00:25:15.400 --> 00:25:17.759
<v Speaker 8>I was making a point. Then he said you misrepresented me.

496
00:25:17.799 --> 00:25:20.319
<v Speaker 8>I said, okay, go ahead, represent yourself. He doesn't want

497
00:25:20.319 --> 00:25:21.000
<v Speaker 8>to represent himself.

498
00:25:21.039 --> 00:25:24.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, I already gave you. I gave you a

499
00:25:24.119 --> 00:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>super precise I don't want to represent myself when I

500
00:25:26.400 --> 00:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>gave you a super precise definition of the turnery.

501
00:25:28.480 --> 00:25:30.599
<v Speaker 2>Come on, you didn't the question I didn't get.

502
00:25:30.599 --> 00:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I gave you a five minute, super precise monarchical turn.

503
00:25:34.039 --> 00:25:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Here's my argument. Anyways. Okay, so yeah, I'm not going

504
00:25:36.720 --> 00:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>to ask you questions.

505
00:25:37.599 --> 00:25:40.200
<v Speaker 8>I'm gonna I'm gonna say my opening statements like you did,

506
00:25:40.240 --> 00:25:41.559
<v Speaker 8>like I love to speak with the interruption.

507
00:25:41.640 --> 00:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>No, you don't get another five minutes. It's your fault

508
00:25:43.720 --> 00:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that you asked me questions. A stupid thing to ask

509
00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>me questions in your opening statement. That was dumb of you.

510
00:25:49.119 --> 00:25:55.519
<v Speaker 8>Okay, okay, I'm gonna continue with my opening statement.

511
00:25:56.160 --> 00:25:56.759
<v Speaker 3>Minutes how many?

512
00:25:56.759 --> 00:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>How many minutes?

513
00:25:57.480 --> 00:25:59.799
<v Speaker 2>No, no, at the same time that you had I'm going.

514
00:25:59.759 --> 00:26:00.440
<v Speaker 4>To be continue.

515
00:26:00.480 --> 00:26:02.720
<v Speaker 3>You've already gone for what four or five minutes. It's

516
00:26:02.759 --> 00:26:04.079
<v Speaker 3>not you asked the question.

517
00:26:04.119 --> 00:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>That's you.

518
00:26:04.720 --> 00:26:06.839
<v Speaker 8>You've been talking to me. It's a waste of time.

519
00:26:06.839 --> 00:26:08.839
<v Speaker 8>I'm not gonna waste my time allowing you.

520
00:26:08.839 --> 00:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>You asked the question, and I'm.

521
00:26:10.200 --> 00:26:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Going to continue.

522
00:26:11.119 --> 00:26:13.359
<v Speaker 8>I'm going to continue with my proposition and you can.

523
00:26:13.480 --> 00:26:15.359
<v Speaker 8>You're not going to keep jumping by saying you're misrepresenting

524
00:26:15.400 --> 00:26:16.039
<v Speaker 8>me as a strong man.

525
00:26:16.039 --> 00:26:16.400
<v Speaker 2>You're going to.

526
00:26:19.039 --> 00:26:20.759
<v Speaker 8>Like I listened to you, and then we can have

527
00:26:20.799 --> 00:26:22.599
<v Speaker 8>a discussion and you can have one to one back

528
00:26:22.599 --> 00:26:23.720
<v Speaker 8>and forth and you can say what everyone.

529
00:26:23.799 --> 00:26:27.640
<v Speaker 7>We'll give you two minutes to finish your segment at

530
00:26:27.720 --> 00:26:28.359
<v Speaker 7>least three minutes.

531
00:26:28.400 --> 00:26:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Two minutes is nine off. First, he made multiple points.

532
00:26:31.640 --> 00:26:35.160
<v Speaker 8>Okay, okay, without interruption, I'm going to continue now with

533
00:26:35.720 --> 00:26:38.200
<v Speaker 8>whatever open statement this Okay, chist fathers were in complete

534
00:26:38.200 --> 00:26:42.079
<v Speaker 8>disagreement on their beliefs and what constitutes the Trinity. There's

535
00:26:42.119 --> 00:26:45.200
<v Speaker 8>many quotes that I have over here I can demonstrate that.

536
00:26:45.640 --> 00:26:47.160
<v Speaker 8>So to try and come and say there's kind of

537
00:26:47.119 --> 00:26:50.119
<v Speaker 8>a unified agreement or whatever it is, that's completely not true.

538
00:26:50.640 --> 00:26:53.359
<v Speaker 8>They had complete different beliefs from one another. I'm going

539
00:26:53.440 --> 00:26:57.000
<v Speaker 8>to read just quickly. Maybe some of these positions so ignacious.

540
00:26:57.039 --> 00:26:59.039
<v Speaker 8>For example, how to put a position of subordinism. You

541
00:26:59.079 --> 00:27:04.480
<v Speaker 8>can lead in his Letter to Magnesians, chapter thirteen, be

542
00:27:04.680 --> 00:27:08.119
<v Speaker 8>subject to the bishop and to one another, as Jesus

543
00:27:08.240 --> 00:27:09.160
<v Speaker 8>Christ to the Father.

544
00:27:09.559 --> 00:27:11.839
<v Speaker 2>So he believes that Jesus Christ was subject to the Father.

545
00:27:12.799 --> 00:27:15.240
<v Speaker 8>You have scholars who say these positions, so it's not

546
00:27:15.319 --> 00:27:17.359
<v Speaker 8>be taking a quotation off of context like some people

547
00:27:17.400 --> 00:27:18.640
<v Speaker 8>who try to come and pretend.

548
00:27:18.920 --> 00:27:21.319
<v Speaker 2>For example, Virginia crowd.

549
00:27:21.039 --> 00:27:23.720
<v Speaker 8>Says in Ignesious and Christianity in Antioch in page one

550
00:27:23.799 --> 00:27:26.559
<v Speaker 8>hundred and forty three, none of these passages. After she's

551
00:27:26.599 --> 00:27:30.880
<v Speaker 8>mentioning some passages of the beliefs that Ignitius had adds

552
00:27:30.920 --> 00:27:33.640
<v Speaker 8>to the understanding of the trinity meant to Ignitius. We

553
00:27:33.680 --> 00:27:38.279
<v Speaker 8>are forced to conclude there was a very undefined belief. Indeed,

554
00:27:38.279 --> 00:27:41.240
<v Speaker 8>so he didn't have a defined belief. William Shaddel says

555
00:27:41.279 --> 00:27:46.599
<v Speaker 8>in Ignacious Commentary, page twenty, Ignacious casually uses traitorian formulas.

556
00:27:46.799 --> 00:27:48.640
<v Speaker 2>He does not. He makes little of them.

557
00:27:48.519 --> 00:27:51.279
<v Speaker 8>Theologically, so he does not make theological arguments and repulse

558
00:27:51.400 --> 00:27:52.039
<v Speaker 8>to the Trinity.

559
00:27:52.880 --> 00:27:55.119
<v Speaker 2>So this is not a specific person believe. I can

560
00:27:55.160 --> 00:27:57.359
<v Speaker 2>do the same thing with urinees. Now with the Trautulian,

561
00:27:57.359 --> 00:27:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't have much tibe, but I can do that.

562
00:27:58.960 --> 00:28:00.799
<v Speaker 8>He is welcome to USK, and I can give the

563
00:28:00.880 --> 00:28:03.519
<v Speaker 8>quotations of every single one of them. Some of them

564
00:28:03.519 --> 00:28:06.039
<v Speaker 8>would believe that the son was created by the father.

565
00:28:06.200 --> 00:28:08.759
<v Speaker 8>Some of them would believe that the father is superior

566
00:28:08.799 --> 00:28:11.799
<v Speaker 8>to the son. They're not co equal, as a doctor

567
00:28:11.839 --> 00:28:15.160
<v Speaker 8>of the Trinity says, now, he says for ancest that

568
00:28:15.240 --> 00:28:17.480
<v Speaker 8>it confirms the previous scriptures. Yeah, well, you know what

569
00:28:17.519 --> 00:28:19.039
<v Speaker 8>it means. But confirms the previous scriptures.

570
00:28:19.039 --> 00:28:21.000
<v Speaker 2>You can open up branch chapter five or seven forty

571
00:28:21.000 --> 00:28:21.799
<v Speaker 2>seven forty.

572
00:28:21.599 --> 00:28:23.880
<v Speaker 8>Eight where it says that it's a criterion over it,

573
00:28:23.920 --> 00:28:26.319
<v Speaker 8>which means whatever disagrees. That's not an e Jazz position,

574
00:28:26.359 --> 00:28:28.119
<v Speaker 8>as you tried to make it as a Muslim position.

575
00:28:28.279 --> 00:28:30.079
<v Speaker 2>And it is mentioned by scholars that the.

576
00:28:30.559 --> 00:28:32.480
<v Speaker 8>Scripture is changed, and if it is changed, they know

577
00:28:32.559 --> 00:28:35.319
<v Speaker 8>ever would disagree with that, then we completely disagree with it.

578
00:28:35.440 --> 00:28:36.480
<v Speaker 2>And what does confirm mean?

579
00:28:36.599 --> 00:28:38.960
<v Speaker 8>It means it confirms that there was previous revelations that

580
00:28:39.039 --> 00:28:41.519
<v Speaker 8>was revealed to the previous profits, and it confirms the

581
00:28:41.559 --> 00:28:42.720
<v Speaker 8>existence of previous profits.

582
00:28:42.759 --> 00:28:43.880
<v Speaker 2>That's what confirmed means.

583
00:28:43.880 --> 00:28:46.279
<v Speaker 8>Doesn't mean that we say that everything in there is

584
00:28:46.480 --> 00:28:50.559
<v Speaker 8>completely Okay. You said proven a corrupted scripture, and not

585
00:28:50.599 --> 00:28:52.200
<v Speaker 8>corrupted scripture is a corrupted scripture.

586
00:28:52.240 --> 00:28:54.680
<v Speaker 2>We don't try to prove Islam using the Bible. Let

587
00:28:54.720 --> 00:28:55.799
<v Speaker 2>we never try to do that.

588
00:28:55.920 --> 00:28:57.599
<v Speaker 8>You said, then ze a doctrine that you've made so

589
00:28:57.640 --> 00:29:01.799
<v Speaker 8>many fallacies trying to equate an attribute to a part,

590
00:29:01.839 --> 00:29:03.079
<v Speaker 8>which is something that we don't believe.

591
00:29:03.440 --> 00:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Where facy, So.

592
00:29:06.880 --> 00:29:07.799
<v Speaker 7>You got one more minute?

593
00:29:08.519 --> 00:29:11.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so we don't believe attributes are parts. We don't

594
00:29:11.799 --> 00:29:13.759
<v Speaker 8>use that terminology when it comes to attributes.

595
00:29:13.400 --> 00:29:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Of alara Yea. To say that just because God has.

596
00:29:15.599 --> 00:29:18.880
<v Speaker 8>Attributes that therefore God has many parts is ridiculous.

597
00:29:18.920 --> 00:29:19.400
<v Speaker 2>To say that.

598
00:29:19.440 --> 00:29:21.240
<v Speaker 8>We say that a lie is not like anyone, and

599
00:29:21.279 --> 00:29:22.960
<v Speaker 8>we have an attribute, he has an attribue before he's

600
00:29:23.039 --> 00:29:25.240
<v Speaker 8>like us. No, we believe for instance, Our knowledge is

601
00:29:25.279 --> 00:29:27.400
<v Speaker 8>limited is the dependent on all law.

602
00:29:27.440 --> 00:29:28.759
<v Speaker 2>We don't know the future.

603
00:29:29.440 --> 00:29:31.759
<v Speaker 8>We forget the knowledge of all lies ultimate. You knows

604
00:29:31.799 --> 00:29:34.720
<v Speaker 8>the past, present of the future. He knows a hypothetical situation.

605
00:29:34.759 --> 00:29:36.359
<v Speaker 8>So it's not the same. So do we say it's

606
00:29:36.359 --> 00:29:38.079
<v Speaker 8>not like it, and it is not like it? Because

607
00:29:38.079 --> 00:29:40.440
<v Speaker 8>God's knowledge is perfect, hour knowledge is limited. And that

608
00:29:40.599 --> 00:29:42.200
<v Speaker 8>is the same with all of the attributes of God.

609
00:29:42.240 --> 00:29:44.279
<v Speaker 8>The way a lot of posesses them is perfect, the

610
00:29:44.279 --> 00:29:46.599
<v Speaker 8>way you persist them or not. An attribute is something

611
00:29:46.640 --> 00:29:49.160
<v Speaker 8>that does not exist, an abstract exist within something, and

612
00:29:49.200 --> 00:29:52.079
<v Speaker 8>that something remains one. Nobody says that having attributes makes

613
00:29:52.119 --> 00:29:54.640
<v Speaker 8>few more than one. I have love, compassion, hat, three year,

614
00:29:54.680 --> 00:29:56.880
<v Speaker 8>all of that. No one says, therefore a hundred or

615
00:29:56.880 --> 00:29:58.519
<v Speaker 8>two hundred because I have different attributes.

616
00:29:59.039 --> 00:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Ridiculous.

617
00:30:00.160 --> 00:30:01.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so it's just to put it in. They like

618
00:30:01.759 --> 00:30:03.599
<v Speaker 8>to say, black cannot exist whether it self has to

619
00:30:03.640 --> 00:30:06.039
<v Speaker 8>exist in a shirt or an object. Attributes do not

620
00:30:06.119 --> 00:30:07.400
<v Speaker 8>exist in vacuum.

621
00:30:07.480 --> 00:30:09.839
<v Speaker 7>Okay, Jane, we'll give you three minutes to respond.

622
00:30:10.240 --> 00:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was foolish, schoolishness, because now this is my time. Dude,

623
00:30:14.240 --> 00:30:18.039
<v Speaker 1>shut up the schoolishness because he admitted that the analogy

624
00:30:18.079 --> 00:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that he gave to parts of a shirt, like attributes

625
00:30:20.720 --> 00:30:21.799
<v Speaker 1>like color, the color black.

626
00:30:21.960 --> 00:30:22.759
<v Speaker 3>Those are parts.

627
00:30:23.160 --> 00:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I didn't argue that you thought

628
00:30:25.160 --> 00:30:26.799
<v Speaker 1>all I had parts. I know that you don't think

629
00:30:26.839 --> 00:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>he does. My argument is that you contradict when you

630
00:30:29.279 --> 00:30:33.039
<v Speaker 1>say that he has attributes that are dependent. Do you

631
00:30:33.160 --> 00:30:36.839
<v Speaker 1>believe that the attributes are self existent or they do

632
00:30:36.880 --> 00:30:39.839
<v Speaker 1>they depend upon all his essence and amongst themselves in

633
00:30:39.880 --> 00:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a dependence relationship. That's the question.

634
00:30:46.400 --> 00:30:48.960
<v Speaker 7>Sure, okay, but then the three minutes.

635
00:30:50.960 --> 00:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not forfeited. He asked me a question in his

636
00:30:52.720 --> 00:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>opening statement. I can ask him a question, and.

637
00:30:55.119 --> 00:30:57.079
<v Speaker 7>Then we decided to go three minutes back and forth.

638
00:30:57.400 --> 00:31:01.079
<v Speaker 7>I mean, if we're going to do questions, then we

639
00:31:01.119 --> 00:31:03.680
<v Speaker 7>can't do the three minutes. Underrupt it again. So okay,

640
00:31:03.720 --> 00:31:06.440
<v Speaker 7>un lets you respond to this muscle answer question thirty

641
00:31:06.440 --> 00:31:07.200
<v Speaker 7>seconds to respond.

642
00:31:08.640 --> 00:31:12.079
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, he mentioned something about the color being a part.

643
00:31:12.359 --> 00:31:14.119
<v Speaker 8>I mentioned many attributes like love and age and this,

644
00:31:14.160 --> 00:31:15.839
<v Speaker 8>and that's that's that is a strong.

645
00:31:15.680 --> 00:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Man, I said, are they dependent relationship?

646
00:31:18.960 --> 00:31:21.880
<v Speaker 8>Now to respond to the dependence or not dependence? We

647
00:31:21.920 --> 00:31:24.039
<v Speaker 8>don't use the terminology a lot us user, so therefore

648
00:31:24.079 --> 00:31:26.640
<v Speaker 8>I don't use it. I believe it's an attribute, and

649
00:31:26.839 --> 00:31:29.599
<v Speaker 8>an attribute exists within the creator.

650
00:31:29.759 --> 00:31:31.720
<v Speaker 2>We don't use the term dependent depend.

651
00:31:31.839 --> 00:31:37.079
<v Speaker 1>Are the distinct and by the way, you do, do

652
00:31:37.240 --> 00:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you do use that terminology and debates because Jake used

653
00:31:40.200 --> 00:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that terminology in many of his debates. I'm not Jake,

654
00:31:42.680 --> 00:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, but what you're saying, you know, you guys

655
00:31:44.240 --> 00:31:45.519
<v Speaker 1>don't use that terminology he did.

656
00:31:46.400 --> 00:31:48.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about from an Islamic position.

657
00:31:49.400 --> 00:31:52.119
<v Speaker 1>So are they dependent on himself? Okay? So in other words,

658
00:31:52.119 --> 00:31:54.519
<v Speaker 1>you have a doublet you have a double standard. Notice

659
00:31:54.519 --> 00:31:56.319
<v Speaker 1>that he has a double standard to where in his

660
00:31:56.440 --> 00:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>position he's allowed to say, I don't have to answer

661
00:31:58.680 --> 00:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>these questions. I don't know the relationship.

662
00:32:01.519 --> 00:32:03.000
<v Speaker 3>That is what you said. You said, we don't have

663
00:32:03.039 --> 00:32:05.920
<v Speaker 3>to answer that. That's what you said dependent.

664
00:32:06.240 --> 00:32:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I asked you what you mean.

665
00:32:07.119 --> 00:32:07.799
<v Speaker 3>Are they are saying?

666
00:32:08.279 --> 00:32:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Are they are saying you have to are they are said?

667
00:32:13.279 --> 00:32:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Are they self existent? Are they self existing? I'm sorry,

668
00:32:16.480 --> 00:32:17.960
<v Speaker 3>you don't know the terms. Are they self existent?

669
00:32:19.240 --> 00:32:20.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean by self existence?

670
00:32:20.640 --> 00:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Do they exist of themselves? You don't know that word.

671
00:32:23.480 --> 00:32:25.240
<v Speaker 2>They exist within the created? As I said to.

672
00:32:25.240 --> 00:32:29.480
<v Speaker 8>You, they're dependent will Allah, they exist will Allah, And

673
00:32:29.599 --> 00:32:32.039
<v Speaker 8>there's nothing that exists separate from his attributes.

674
00:32:32.039 --> 00:32:33.839
<v Speaker 3>You're making are the attributes.

675
00:32:35.039 --> 00:32:38.599
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a classic debate within Youraquita you Raquita's debate

676
00:32:38.640 --> 00:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this and you know.

677
00:32:39.200 --> 00:32:41.880
<v Speaker 2>That I don't know what you don't.

678
00:32:41.680 --> 00:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Know what a school is. Now he's lying like he's

679
00:32:44.160 --> 00:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>playing like he doesn't. This is what they do. They

680
00:32:46.160 --> 00:32:48.279
<v Speaker 1>pretend that they don't know. These are classic debates that

681
00:32:48.319 --> 00:32:50.599
<v Speaker 1>they killed each other over the relationship of like like

682
00:32:50.640 --> 00:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the Mutazila, the Multa, the Salafi, you all do this

683
00:32:54.480 --> 00:32:54.799
<v Speaker 1>does all?

684
00:32:54.799 --> 00:32:56.079
<v Speaker 3>I have an uncreated foot.

685
00:32:57.240 --> 00:33:01.039
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so you talked about what did they leave the

686
00:33:01.160 --> 00:33:03.079
<v Speaker 8>give me the four principles of five.

687
00:33:02.960 --> 00:33:03.440
<v Speaker 7>Principles and.

688
00:33:05.079 --> 00:33:08.279
<v Speaker 1>The neo platon the neol So here's what he does.

689
00:33:09.359 --> 00:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So he's deflecting away because he won't answer these questions.

690
00:33:12.640 --> 00:33:14.119
<v Speaker 3>Notice he won't answer their questions.

691
00:33:14.279 --> 00:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Argument. So, whether it's the people who believe in the

692
00:33:16.440 --> 00:33:18.759
<v Speaker 1>body parts of all law or whether it's the neo

693
00:33:18.839 --> 00:33:20.279
<v Speaker 1>platon is, he won't answer.

694
00:33:22.039 --> 00:33:24.000
<v Speaker 3>They have the same position as the neo platonist.

695
00:33:24.039 --> 00:33:24.400
<v Speaker 7>She do.

696
00:33:25.480 --> 00:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>That's what you said to present.

697
00:33:27.960 --> 00:33:29.079
<v Speaker 1>You're not No, I don't have.

698
00:33:29.079 --> 00:33:31.240
<v Speaker 3>To define your schools for you. You tell me what.

699
00:33:31.759 --> 00:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So you don't have it. It doesn't matter the four principles.

700
00:33:34.400 --> 00:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>When you can't answer the question, if you can't notice,

701
00:33:37.000 --> 00:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he won't answer the question of Allah and the attributes

702
00:33:39.160 --> 00:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of relation because he doesn't know what the word self existed.

703
00:33:41.720 --> 00:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, you're incorrectly what's your position?

704
00:33:45.599 --> 00:33:48.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't care about them. What's your position? What's your position?

705
00:33:49.480 --> 00:33:50.039
<v Speaker 2>My positions?

706
00:33:52.039 --> 00:33:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Which is what? So you're obfuscating.

707
00:33:54.799 --> 00:33:55.759
<v Speaker 2>You got to give me a question.

708
00:33:55.799 --> 00:33:58.920
<v Speaker 3>And then what is the relationship of Allah to his attributes?

709
00:33:58.960 --> 00:34:00.400
<v Speaker 3>Are they? Are they as or not?

710
00:34:01.440 --> 00:34:03.799
<v Speaker 2>I responded, You're going to know you're doing it.

711
00:34:03.799 --> 00:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You're deflecting, and you're you're collapsing human The attribute is

712
00:34:06.960 --> 00:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not everyone knows this.

713
00:34:08.039 --> 00:34:08.559
<v Speaker 3>No they don't.

714
00:34:08.559 --> 00:34:10.639
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that you're you're saying your schools don't debate

715
00:34:10.760 --> 00:34:14.639
<v Speaker 1>this is you don't even know what.

716
00:34:15.960 --> 00:34:18.079
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter what you do, It doesn't matter. Maybe

717
00:34:18.079 --> 00:34:20.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know anything. Maybe I don't know anything. That's

718
00:34:20.320 --> 00:34:23.920
<v Speaker 3>a fallacy. That doesn't prove your position. Okay, so you're

719
00:34:23.920 --> 00:34:24.760
<v Speaker 3>a fallacy machine.

720
00:34:26.159 --> 00:34:29.159
<v Speaker 1>So you can't answer this basic question, can you? You

721
00:34:29.199 --> 00:34:31.559
<v Speaker 1>don't know the relationship of all to his attributes. For

722
00:34:31.599 --> 00:34:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the fourth time, but you didn't answer.

723
00:34:35.400 --> 00:34:36.599
<v Speaker 3>I told you, deflect.

724
00:34:37.800 --> 00:34:41.199
<v Speaker 8>I told you the attributes of Allah are not something

725
00:34:41.239 --> 00:34:43.880
<v Speaker 8>that we say is a part or separated from a lot.

726
00:34:43.880 --> 00:34:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Believe that.

727
00:34:44.400 --> 00:34:45.559
<v Speaker 1>How does that solve the question?

728
00:34:45.800 --> 00:34:46.280
<v Speaker 3>So are they?

729
00:34:46.320 --> 00:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Are?

730
00:34:46.480 --> 00:34:47.000
<v Speaker 3>They?

731
00:34:47.440 --> 00:34:49.559
<v Speaker 2>Just like you cannot separate my love and hate from me?

732
00:34:50.079 --> 00:34:53.480
<v Speaker 3>But those are parts of you that I thought all

733
00:34:53.480 --> 00:34:56.039
<v Speaker 3>that is nothing like I thought. He's nothing like creatures.

734
00:34:56.320 --> 00:34:57.880
<v Speaker 3>I thought he's nothing like creatures.

735
00:34:58.039 --> 00:34:59.599
<v Speaker 2>You say the sport, So it shows that.

736
00:34:59.559 --> 00:35:01.559
<v Speaker 1>You are saying you said the parts.

737
00:35:01.159 --> 00:35:03.880
<v Speaker 3>You can't understand that I'm putting you into.

738
00:35:03.679 --> 00:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>A putzel bar like a kid.

739
00:35:05.480 --> 00:35:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Like a child.

740
00:35:06.000 --> 00:35:10.320
<v Speaker 8>You're just exposing your ignorance attribute parts because that's your position.

741
00:35:12.360 --> 00:35:15.559
<v Speaker 1>You contradicted yourself when you compared it to parts of

742
00:35:15.599 --> 00:35:16.039
<v Speaker 1>your shirt.

743
00:35:16.119 --> 00:35:20.880
<v Speaker 10>Dude, does your shirt have parts? Does your shirt have parts?

744
00:35:21.880 --> 00:35:23.840
<v Speaker 10>Now I go back to the dollarscript. Now I go

745
00:35:23.920 --> 00:35:27.280
<v Speaker 10>back to the dogars script. You you have none or

746
00:35:27.320 --> 00:35:27.880
<v Speaker 10>nine gods?

747
00:35:27.880 --> 00:35:30.199
<v Speaker 2>Independent? Existence is independent?

748
00:35:30.320 --> 00:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Wells oh, so now you know the word I'll say.

749
00:35:33.159 --> 00:35:34.119
<v Speaker 3>Now you know what I'll say.

750
00:35:34.119 --> 00:35:34.320
<v Speaker 4>You mean?

751
00:35:35.119 --> 00:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>So this guy's a snake. Look, he knows what the

752
00:35:36.840 --> 00:35:39.119
<v Speaker 1>word I say means. He pretended like you didn't know earlier,

753
00:35:39.159 --> 00:35:42.039
<v Speaker 1>because now he says, the trinity is that they're not independent.

754
00:35:42.679 --> 00:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't believe in independent exists. They're not independent. That's

755
00:35:46.480 --> 00:35:47.159
<v Speaker 1>not our position.

756
00:35:47.920 --> 00:35:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm prostrating to him. That's not attribute.

757
00:35:49.800 --> 00:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't even you don't even know what I already refuted.

758
00:35:51.920 --> 00:35:57.559
<v Speaker 1>That's when I gave you monarchical trinitarianism. All he does,

759
00:35:57.960 --> 00:35:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that's monarchical trinitarianism.

760
00:35:59.719 --> 00:36:01.679
<v Speaker 3>That's the position I gave you the outset.

761
00:36:01.679 --> 00:36:03.559
<v Speaker 2>Losing it and acting like a child. And I think

762
00:36:03.599 --> 00:36:04.639
<v Speaker 2>you gotta know because.

763
00:36:04.519 --> 00:36:07.119
<v Speaker 1>You're saying this, because you literally didn't answer any of

764
00:36:07.119 --> 00:36:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the questions I asked you about the attributes.

765
00:36:08.719 --> 00:36:11.920
<v Speaker 3>You said parts like shirts. Shirts have parts. Dude, that's

766
00:36:12.000 --> 00:36:12.679
<v Speaker 3>your analogy.

767
00:36:13.039 --> 00:36:15.079
<v Speaker 2>I said, black I think that's part of you.

768
00:36:15.079 --> 00:36:17.079
<v Speaker 3>You don't think shirt. You know, so blackness is not

769
00:36:17.119 --> 00:36:18.039
<v Speaker 3>part of your shirt?

770
00:36:18.679 --> 00:36:19.639
<v Speaker 2>Showed me the existence of.

771
00:36:21.119 --> 00:36:23.480
<v Speaker 3>What does that have to do? It's a part. Say

772
00:36:23.519 --> 00:36:24.599
<v Speaker 3>it's accidental. I don't care.

773
00:36:24.960 --> 00:36:26.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not attribute.

774
00:36:26.519 --> 00:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And also so it's an attribute of a shirt which

775
00:36:29.920 --> 00:36:30.760
<v Speaker 1>is made up of parts.

776
00:36:30.840 --> 00:36:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, Well.

777
00:36:33.440 --> 00:36:36.159
<v Speaker 1>So you use the analogy to a creature when all

778
00:36:36.280 --> 00:36:39.159
<v Speaker 1>is nothing like creatures, I'll give.

779
00:36:39.079 --> 00:36:39.519
<v Speaker 2>It an imergy.

780
00:36:39.559 --> 00:36:41.239
<v Speaker 8>So well, like you said, they can't understand. We can't

781
00:36:41.239 --> 00:36:42.519
<v Speaker 8>have attributes on a.

782
00:36:41.960 --> 00:36:44.519
<v Speaker 1>Look, but All is nothing like creatures, so it doesn't.

783
00:36:44.239 --> 00:36:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Work his attributes. That does not what we mean.

784
00:36:46.440 --> 00:36:48.920
<v Speaker 8>No Muslims called in Isamic history, he said that there's

785
00:36:48.960 --> 00:36:49.280
<v Speaker 8>nothing like.

786
00:36:49.559 --> 00:36:50.760
<v Speaker 2>It means he doesn't have attributes.

787
00:36:51.840 --> 00:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>No, it says that he's nothing like creatures.

788
00:36:54.559 --> 00:36:56.119
<v Speaker 3>So it's a contradiction.

789
00:36:57.119 --> 00:36:58.760
<v Speaker 2>The attributes of all lot makes me perfect.

790
00:36:58.800 --> 00:37:01.239
<v Speaker 8>We can have attributes, butted attribute the creator can have

791
00:37:01.320 --> 00:37:01.920
<v Speaker 8>Mexic prefect.

792
00:37:02.000 --> 00:37:04.079
<v Speaker 1>I know you believe that, but you don't even understand

793
00:37:04.079 --> 00:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the contradiction. I'm pointing out, how is there a comparison

794
00:37:08.000 --> 00:37:10.199
<v Speaker 1>of all to creatures when he's nothing like creatures.

795
00:37:10.599 --> 00:37:12.440
<v Speaker 3>You compared him to your shirt and the parts of

796
00:37:12.480 --> 00:37:12.920
<v Speaker 3>your shirt?

797
00:37:13.320 --> 00:37:15.719
<v Speaker 8>What do you mean? What do you mean by nothing like?

798
00:37:15.840 --> 00:37:19.599
<v Speaker 8>What do you mean by that? Like honestly such a

799
00:37:19.679 --> 00:37:20.119
<v Speaker 8>child thing?

800
00:37:20.199 --> 00:37:21.760
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean by it? There's nothing like love?

801
00:37:21.960 --> 00:37:23.599
<v Speaker 1>What we mean by I mean when it says that

802
00:37:23.639 --> 00:37:26.679
<v Speaker 1>in the in forty two it says Allah is nothing

803
00:37:26.840 --> 00:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like creatures.

804
00:37:28.840 --> 00:37:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And I responded to you and you gave.

805
00:37:31.039 --> 00:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>An analogy of a created shirt and it's parts.

806
00:37:34.199 --> 00:37:36.719
<v Speaker 8>No, No, I didn't do that, Yes, you did, as

807
00:37:36.719 --> 00:37:37.599
<v Speaker 8>I said.

808
00:37:37.000 --> 00:37:39.199
<v Speaker 1>You just said that. Look, he says, no, I did

809
00:37:39.280 --> 00:37:42.199
<v Speaker 1>not know that. You said, the black on my shirt

810
00:37:42.719 --> 00:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is an attribute.

811
00:37:43.480 --> 00:37:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Colors? I said, colors don't exist at abstract.

812
00:37:46.400 --> 00:37:47.480
<v Speaker 3>What does that have to sell?

813
00:37:47.519 --> 00:37:49.000
<v Speaker 2>That has to exist, has to exist.

814
00:37:49.119 --> 00:37:51.800
<v Speaker 3>It's so, is your shirt that created analogy? Is it

815
00:37:51.800 --> 00:37:53.480
<v Speaker 3>a created analogy?

816
00:37:53.519 --> 00:37:54.000
<v Speaker 2>The shirt?

817
00:37:54.320 --> 00:37:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Is it a created analogy?

818
00:37:56.000 --> 00:37:58.320
<v Speaker 2>The color black is an attrib Is.

819
00:37:58.239 --> 00:37:58.960
<v Speaker 3>It an analogy?

820
00:37:59.760 --> 00:38:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Create the things analogous to law?

821
00:38:02.280 --> 00:38:02.840
<v Speaker 3>That's the point.

822
00:38:04.280 --> 00:38:06.679
<v Speaker 1>No, you're just not answering, you're avoiding it. So you're

823
00:38:06.760 --> 00:38:10.039
<v Speaker 1>using creative things with parts that are composite as an

824
00:38:10.079 --> 00:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>analogy to Allah, who's nothing like creatures.

825
00:38:13.599 --> 00:38:15.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's do timing because as you can see, it's.

826
00:38:15.719 --> 00:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Just because he's running over me. Let's do the do

827
00:38:18.840 --> 00:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the timing because I can't do it.

828
00:38:21.400 --> 00:38:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Because other people.

829
00:38:24.480 --> 00:38:26.519
<v Speaker 7>Well, we'll go, we'll resume from Jay's question, and then

830
00:38:26.519 --> 00:38:28.440
<v Speaker 7>we'll do thirty seconds back and forth. He shian, I'm

831
00:38:28.440 --> 00:38:30.000
<v Speaker 7>going to be specific with the timers. So Jay, can

832
00:38:30.039 --> 00:38:30.719
<v Speaker 7>you repeat your question?

833
00:38:30.800 --> 00:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And the other question was very explicitly, you made an

834
00:38:33.960 --> 00:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>analogy to Allah and his attributes to a shirt with

835
00:38:39.599 --> 00:38:44.079
<v Speaker 1>parts and accidental things like colors. When the Quran says

836
00:38:44.119 --> 00:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>twice that Allah is nothing like creatures. So your analogy

837
00:38:47.760 --> 00:38:49.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work and it doesn't tell us anything. How do

838
00:38:49.519 --> 00:38:50.039
<v Speaker 1>you resolve that?

839
00:38:51.119 --> 00:38:51.960
<v Speaker 7>Thirty seconds?

840
00:38:52.400 --> 00:38:55.239
<v Speaker 8>Okay, I never made that. He doesn't understand what he's

841
00:38:55.280 --> 00:38:57.559
<v Speaker 8>talking about. I made an analogy for him about the

842
00:38:57.559 --> 00:39:00.480
<v Speaker 8>idea of an attribute, the attributes. Now the analogies to

843
00:39:00.480 --> 00:39:02.280
<v Speaker 8>do the attributes, not to do with all lies conflicting

844
00:39:02.280 --> 00:39:02.519
<v Speaker 8>the two.

845
00:39:02.559 --> 00:39:05.119
<v Speaker 2>It's not the idea is that attributes do not existing.

846
00:39:06.760 --> 00:39:08.119
<v Speaker 2>Come on, yeah, he can't do it right.

847
00:39:08.199 --> 00:39:10.159
<v Speaker 8>The attributes do not exist and abstract they have to

848
00:39:10.280 --> 00:39:12.960
<v Speaker 8>exist to them something. They're not saparable, they're not parts.

849
00:39:13.280 --> 00:39:14.920
<v Speaker 8>And that's how we look at that.

850
00:39:14.960 --> 00:39:17.320
<v Speaker 2>It's not like anything that's attributes are maximally perfect. They're

851
00:39:17.320 --> 00:39:19.159
<v Speaker 2>not like ours. Simple. It's very very simple.

852
00:39:19.199 --> 00:39:21.400
<v Speaker 7>And people listening, he doesn't even unerstand the critique.

853
00:39:24.880 --> 00:39:27.119
<v Speaker 2>Okay, do you want to do the question thing? So

854
00:39:27.199 --> 00:39:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I should give.

855
00:39:28.280 --> 00:39:29.440
<v Speaker 3>It so once again?

856
00:39:30.800 --> 00:39:33.639
<v Speaker 7>Okay, okay, so now let's let's let answer respond with

857
00:39:33.639 --> 00:39:35.280
<v Speaker 7>the question. But we have to do uninterrupted or else

858
00:39:35.320 --> 00:39:36.840
<v Speaker 7>this is a this is waste of time. So I'll

859
00:39:36.880 --> 00:39:39.320
<v Speaker 7>let answer pose a question here. You could also respond

860
00:39:39.920 --> 00:39:41.719
<v Speaker 7>to where you wanted the last one, but the thirty

861
00:39:41.719 --> 00:39:42.960
<v Speaker 7>seconds back and forth, answer and.

862
00:39:43.239 --> 00:39:46.719
<v Speaker 8>Go ahead, all right, So he agreed that the trinity

863
00:39:46.760 --> 00:39:49.119
<v Speaker 8>means that the three persons are quote equal quotes. We

864
00:39:49.159 --> 00:39:51.960
<v Speaker 8>look at Jesus and Mark thirteen thirty two, who explicitly

865
00:39:52.039 --> 00:39:54.760
<v Speaker 8>mentions and says that he does not know the hour

866
00:39:54.800 --> 00:39:56.239
<v Speaker 8>while the Father knows the hour.

867
00:39:56.280 --> 00:39:57.719
<v Speaker 2>And I can bring a quote from a church father

868
00:39:57.800 --> 00:39:58.079
<v Speaker 2>right now.

869
00:39:58.039 --> 00:40:01.960
<v Speaker 8>Always explaining that this priority of the father over the

870
00:40:02.000 --> 00:40:04.000
<v Speaker 8>son did not equal because one of them knows when

871
00:40:04.000 --> 00:40:05.400
<v Speaker 8>the hour is going to happen, the other doesn't know.

872
00:40:05.559 --> 00:40:07.400
<v Speaker 8>GeSe is going to say that his human nature, it's

873
00:40:07.400 --> 00:40:10.719
<v Speaker 8>irrelevant because he had both natures, divine and human natures.

874
00:40:10.719 --> 00:40:12.719
<v Speaker 2>You cannot come and say does the human nature? So

875
00:40:12.800 --> 00:40:14.519
<v Speaker 2>how does Jesus not know something?

876
00:40:14.559 --> 00:40:16.000
<v Speaker 8>And you clear that he's equal to the Father and

877
00:40:16.000 --> 00:40:18.079
<v Speaker 8>the Holy Spirit doesn't know as well, because the verse

878
00:40:18.079 --> 00:40:20.360
<v Speaker 8>says only the Father knows Mark thirteen thirty two.

879
00:40:20.960 --> 00:40:22.519
<v Speaker 7>Okay, do you have a question to follow up?

880
00:40:23.960 --> 00:40:27.000
<v Speaker 2>I know is he is supposed to answer right? Question? Answer?

881
00:40:27.599 --> 00:40:27.880
<v Speaker 7>Did you?

882
00:40:28.079 --> 00:40:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Well?

883
00:40:28.800 --> 00:40:29.360
<v Speaker 7>Was the question?

884
00:40:29.719 --> 00:40:30.840
<v Speaker 2>The question is how.

885
00:40:30.840 --> 00:40:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's about Jesus? Yeah, so I agree, I agree, understands yeah,

886
00:40:35.360 --> 00:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and no I don't answer it the way he thought

887
00:40:37.000 --> 00:40:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I was going to answer. I answer it according to

888
00:40:38.440 --> 00:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the way Saint Basil does in letter two thirty five

889
00:40:40.840 --> 00:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and six, where he says that the limitation there is

890
00:40:43.880 --> 00:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a form of rhetoric or exaggeration, which Jesus does in

891
00:40:46.320 --> 00:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>many places where he says, for example, that there's none

892
00:40:48.519 --> 00:40:51.119
<v Speaker 1>good but the Father. Does that mean that no one

893
00:40:51.119 --> 00:40:53.519
<v Speaker 1>else is good? No, it's rhetoric because in other places

894
00:40:53.559 --> 00:40:56.679
<v Speaker 1>he also qualifies that and says that the Son also

895
00:40:56.840 --> 00:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is good. He says that people are good, the Holy

896
00:40:59.039 --> 00:41:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Spirit is good, a good man will do this or that.

897
00:41:00.920 --> 00:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>So no, when he says things like that, we have

898
00:41:03.320 --> 00:41:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a consistent exegetical pattern as to how we explain those passages,

899
00:41:08.119 --> 00:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and we don't believe the Bible contradicts. So there are

900
00:41:10.280 --> 00:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>passages that talk about the subordination, which, if he understood

901
00:41:13.920 --> 00:41:17.280
<v Speaker 1>what monarchical trinitarianism is, we recognize a subordination of the

902
00:41:17.320 --> 00:41:20.079
<v Speaker 1>son to the Father, but not according to essence. So

903
00:41:20.119 --> 00:41:23.280
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't understand that that's different. That's a different theology

904
00:41:23.280 --> 00:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>than he has. He thinks that distinction entails like differences

905
00:41:27.039 --> 00:41:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of ontology. We believe that just as a

906
00:41:29.880 --> 00:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>son can show the same nature as his father. He

907
00:41:32.360 --> 00:41:34.519
<v Speaker 1>can be subject to the father. That doesn't doesn't mean

908
00:41:34.519 --> 00:41:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the father has more human nature than a son. That's

909
00:41:36.679 --> 00:41:39.199
<v Speaker 1>an analogy. Your position, by the way, doesn't make sense

910
00:41:39.239 --> 00:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of analogies, because you said you made an

911
00:41:41.480 --> 00:41:45.320
<v Speaker 1>analogy to help me. But your very analogy doesn't work

912
00:41:45.400 --> 00:41:49.280
<v Speaker 1>because Allah's attributes and his existence are nothing like the

913
00:41:49.280 --> 00:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>thing and things in the created order, So your analogy

914
00:41:51.400 --> 00:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. That was the critique, and you just keep

915
00:41:53.920 --> 00:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>saying that was a.

916
00:41:55.639 --> 00:41:58.840
<v Speaker 7>Bit over a minute on Langard. If you responded a minute, yeah.

917
00:41:58.679 --> 00:42:01.679
<v Speaker 8>Okay, I was pulling very, very simply. That's how Christians

918
00:42:01.840 --> 00:42:03.719
<v Speaker 8>try to away from this scripture. I just said, I

919
00:42:03.760 --> 00:42:08.199
<v Speaker 8>can present quotations that can present commentary if people explicitly

920
00:42:08.239 --> 00:42:11.559
<v Speaker 8>saying that this is an issue, that one knows something

921
00:42:11.559 --> 00:42:12.760
<v Speaker 8>well the other doesn't know something.

922
00:42:12.760 --> 00:42:14.440
<v Speaker 2>But oh, this is just sy meetric critric.

923
00:42:14.760 --> 00:42:16.320
<v Speaker 8>Jesus says there's no one good but the Father. He

924
00:42:16.360 --> 00:42:18.559
<v Speaker 8>means ultimately good. Yes, there is no one perfect in

925
00:42:18.599 --> 00:42:19.719
<v Speaker 8>his goodness except the Father.

926
00:42:19.920 --> 00:42:21.199
<v Speaker 2>We agree there's no issues there.

927
00:42:21.239 --> 00:42:23.400
<v Speaker 8>So that verse that Jesus says doesn't have an issue,

928
00:42:23.440 --> 00:42:25.320
<v Speaker 8>we also agree with. He says he doesn't know that

929
00:42:25.400 --> 00:42:27.400
<v Speaker 8>he doesn't know. And you cannot be God and you

930
00:42:27.440 --> 00:42:29.880
<v Speaker 8>don't know something because God knows everything all the time,

931
00:42:30.039 --> 00:42:31.840
<v Speaker 8>so you cannot run away from the subject in something.

932
00:42:31.880 --> 00:42:33.679
<v Speaker 8>And you said, by the way, the son is subject

933
00:42:33.679 --> 00:42:35.320
<v Speaker 8>to the father, you believe the son is subject of exactly,

934
00:42:35.360 --> 00:42:35.679
<v Speaker 8>so it's.

935
00:42:35.559 --> 00:42:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Subject to the Father.

936
00:42:36.559 --> 00:42:38.800
<v Speaker 8>They're not quite equal in the sense that they are

937
00:42:38.880 --> 00:42:41.360
<v Speaker 8>equal in every position, in every way, every shing. And

938
00:42:41.400 --> 00:42:43.199
<v Speaker 8>that's why we say that what you call the Father

939
00:42:43.320 --> 00:42:43.920
<v Speaker 8>is a true God, but.

940
00:42:44.039 --> 00:42:46.079
<v Speaker 2>Jesus is someone who's subjected to him. There is not

941
00:42:46.119 --> 00:42:46.639
<v Speaker 2>some belief.

942
00:42:47.760 --> 00:42:49.639
<v Speaker 7>Okay, Jay figures find in a minute.

943
00:42:50.119 --> 00:42:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you're missing the point that at the beginning

944
00:42:52.719 --> 00:42:55.079
<v Speaker 1>I said that I wouldn't immediately commit to your understanding

945
00:42:55.079 --> 00:42:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of the words coequal, because in some ways they are

946
00:42:57.320 --> 00:42:59.719
<v Speaker 1>equal in terms of power and in terms of nature,

947
00:43:00.039 --> 00:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean they're equal in every sense. So

948
00:43:01.960 --> 00:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why I was hesitant to agree to your tricks

949
00:43:05.039 --> 00:43:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of terminology there with making it simple and making it easy.

950
00:43:08.679 --> 00:43:11.599
<v Speaker 1>That's why I use monarchical trinitarianism, which again to use

951
00:43:11.639 --> 00:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the analogy of a father or a king and his son.

952
00:43:14.639 --> 00:43:18.199
<v Speaker 1>The king and the son the prince possessed the same natures.

953
00:43:18.239 --> 00:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>The king is not more human than the son, and

954
00:43:20.920 --> 00:43:23.719
<v Speaker 1>yet the son still is subject to the Father. This

955
00:43:23.800 --> 00:43:26.679
<v Speaker 1>is orthodox trinitarianism. I'm not a Roman Catholic, so this

956
00:43:26.760 --> 00:43:29.039
<v Speaker 1>is our position, which I stated from the very outset

957
00:43:29.039 --> 00:43:30.639
<v Speaker 1>in the first five minutes. But you just didn't know

958
00:43:30.639 --> 00:43:33.199
<v Speaker 1>about that. But when you gave your analogy again of

959
00:43:33.199 --> 00:43:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the attributes, you didn't answer the question. You avoided it,

960
00:43:36.159 --> 00:43:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you ignored it, and you wanted to switch over into

961
00:43:37.840 --> 00:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the question of Jesus knowledge, Which is fine. I don't

962
00:43:40.000 --> 00:43:42.440
<v Speaker 1>have a problem of mentioning the fact that Jesus uses

963
00:43:42.760 --> 00:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric and exaggerated language all the time. He says if

964
00:43:45.320 --> 00:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>your hand caused you to cut it off, He's not

965
00:43:47.920 --> 00:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>saying literally cut your hand off. He's also not saying

966
00:43:50.519 --> 00:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that no one is good but the Father.

967
00:43:52.639 --> 00:43:53.280
<v Speaker 3>It's rhetoric.

968
00:43:53.400 --> 00:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>So in the same way he can express that the

969
00:43:55.719 --> 00:44:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Father is the sole source of all existence, goodness, knowledge, etc. U.

970
00:44:00.480 --> 00:44:03.159
<v Speaker 1>And yet at the same time the other passages also

971
00:44:03.239 --> 00:44:06.119
<v Speaker 1>confirm in John five and six that Jesus has all

972
00:44:06.159 --> 00:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the same powers, knowledge, and activities as the Father. Everything

973
00:44:10.360 --> 00:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>the Father has has been committed to the son. So

974
00:44:12.440 --> 00:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you selectively choose the passages, and I want to go

975
00:44:15.400 --> 00:44:17.679
<v Speaker 1>back to my question. Then, how do you know which

976
00:44:17.760 --> 00:44:21.039
<v Speaker 1>passages are the correct passages in the Bible and which

977
00:44:21.079 --> 00:44:25.280
<v Speaker 1>ones are the corrupted ones? When Allah's work cannot be corrupted.

978
00:44:25.639 --> 00:44:30.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm told in uh five four, well over.

979
00:44:30.280 --> 00:44:32.559
<v Speaker 7>A minute, I'll if you can response to that question.

980
00:44:32.800 --> 00:44:33.840
<v Speaker 7>I'll give you ninety seconds.

981
00:44:34.119 --> 00:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>All right.

982
00:44:34.519 --> 00:44:36.679
<v Speaker 2>I'm very happy that. Look he shows that he changes

983
00:44:36.679 --> 00:44:39.000
<v Speaker 2>his position. He agreed, and I said, is that the trinity?

984
00:44:39.039 --> 00:44:40.320
<v Speaker 2>He shakes his head and he said, yes.

985
00:44:40.599 --> 00:44:42.320
<v Speaker 8>Now he knows that this is going to be problematic,

986
00:44:42.400 --> 00:44:43.639
<v Speaker 8>so he admits that they're not equal.

987
00:44:43.719 --> 00:44:45.719
<v Speaker 2>That I'm happy. That's it. That's what we will not.

988
00:44:46.000 --> 00:44:49.519
<v Speaker 1>No, you're just you're just confused on the interrupting.

989
00:44:49.599 --> 00:44:51.639
<v Speaker 2>Don't interrupt. Shut up. Like you said to me, I'll

990
00:44:51.639 --> 00:44:52.639
<v Speaker 2>say the same thing.

991
00:44:52.760 --> 00:44:56.079
<v Speaker 8>They're not they're not equal. With your own statement, you

992
00:44:56.159 --> 00:44:58.480
<v Speaker 8>said that they are not equally. Yes, they are not equal. Exactly,

993
00:44:58.599 --> 00:45:00.519
<v Speaker 8>so we believe is Muslims, the father, who you call

994
00:45:00.559 --> 00:45:02.199
<v Speaker 8>the father superior to what you call the son. You

995
00:45:02.280 --> 00:45:04.480
<v Speaker 8>give an analogy of king and son. Exactly, the king

996
00:45:04.800 --> 00:45:06.280
<v Speaker 8>came as the son is superior to the son.

997
00:45:06.360 --> 00:45:07.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not equal to him.

998
00:45:07.519 --> 00:45:08.760
<v Speaker 3>So ill nature.

999
00:45:09.000 --> 00:45:09.559
<v Speaker 1>You're lying.

1000
00:45:09.800 --> 00:45:11.400
<v Speaker 3>I said your nature.

1001
00:45:11.679 --> 00:45:16.519
<v Speaker 8>You're interrupting again. You're interrupting it. Say thank you, please

1002
00:45:16.559 --> 00:45:19.079
<v Speaker 8>don't interrupt. When it comes to e retric and a

1003
00:45:19.400 --> 00:45:20.800
<v Speaker 8>retric they run away from.

1004
00:45:20.679 --> 00:45:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Anything which is key.

1005
00:45:21.480 --> 00:45:23.440
<v Speaker 8>For example, I'll bring him now, John seventeen three. When

1006
00:45:23.480 --> 00:45:25.840
<v Speaker 8>Jesus say is explicitly it is no true God. The

1007
00:45:25.840 --> 00:45:27.559
<v Speaker 8>only true God is the Father. He says, the only

1008
00:45:27.639 --> 00:45:29.639
<v Speaker 8>true God addressing the Father is the only true God,

1009
00:45:30.039 --> 00:45:32.440
<v Speaker 8>and he doesn't get, which means that any other deity

1010
00:45:32.480 --> 00:45:35.079
<v Speaker 8>is false. We have all of the Bible Jesus making

1011
00:45:35.199 --> 00:45:37.000
<v Speaker 8>statements that can be a pei divine. I can say

1012
00:45:37.000 --> 00:45:39.000
<v Speaker 8>it's retaker as well. Anyone can say a trick. Okay,

1013
00:45:39.000 --> 00:45:40.840
<v Speaker 8>whatever verse you got to bring up is also the trick.

1014
00:45:40.960 --> 00:45:43.119
<v Speaker 8>And we play this game which versitt all life. We

1015
00:45:43.239 --> 00:45:46.079
<v Speaker 8>just call it a retric. The game with playing with

1016
00:45:46.400 --> 00:45:48.079
<v Speaker 8>these things that don't agree with you is you try

1017
00:45:48.079 --> 00:45:50.239
<v Speaker 8>to escape the position and the fact that Jesus subordinate

1018
00:45:50.320 --> 00:45:50.880
<v Speaker 8>is submissive.

1019
00:45:50.960 --> 00:45:52.280
<v Speaker 2>So you have people arguing it in.

1020
00:45:52.280 --> 00:45:54.039
<v Speaker 8>The counsel of m I say, and other councils because

1021
00:45:54.039 --> 00:45:56.960
<v Speaker 8>they believe they was subordinated, didn't believe he was equal.

1022
00:45:57.119 --> 00:45:59.079
<v Speaker 8>You have tons of harrisies due to that, because the

1023
00:45:59.119 --> 00:46:01.960
<v Speaker 8>trinity makes no sense. Now you lie by the way,

1024
00:46:02.000 --> 00:46:03.719
<v Speaker 8>and you said, there's a verse in John. This is

1025
00:46:03.760 --> 00:46:05.519
<v Speaker 8>that they have the same power, they have the same knowledge,

1026
00:46:05.519 --> 00:46:07.679
<v Speaker 8>You have the same wisdom. Whoever it is, I head

1027
00:46:07.760 --> 00:46:10.519
<v Speaker 8>and read that verse for us exactly what it says.

1028
00:46:10.639 --> 00:46:12.480
<v Speaker 8>Now you said in the Paranah'm responding to what you said,

1029
00:46:12.480 --> 00:46:15.519
<v Speaker 8>the paran which verse which verses are product, to which

1030
00:46:15.599 --> 00:46:17.639
<v Speaker 8>verses are not. Whoever agrees with the poran we believe

1031
00:46:17.679 --> 00:46:21.280
<v Speaker 8>that is therefore accepted untrue. Whatever it disagrees, we reject.

1032
00:46:21.320 --> 00:46:23.679
<v Speaker 8>Whatever doesn't agree or disagree. We are agnostic about it.

1033
00:46:23.679 --> 00:46:25.320
<v Speaker 8>That is the Islamic position given by the prophet.

1034
00:46:25.360 --> 00:46:27.559
<v Speaker 2>And now you.

1035
00:46:29.280 --> 00:46:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Ninety tects respond, Yeah, this guy's playing games because he

1036
00:46:32.199 --> 00:46:35.760
<v Speaker 1>knows that nobody interprets any text as if every single

1037
00:46:35.800 --> 00:46:39.599
<v Speaker 1>phrase or idea that is expressed is in that single text.

1038
00:46:39.599 --> 00:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>The trinity is a doctrine that's derived from all the

1039
00:46:42.039 --> 00:46:44.280
<v Speaker 1>texts of the scriptures, not from this or that verse.

1040
00:46:44.320 --> 00:46:47.039
<v Speaker 1>And so he's setting up a false criteria for me

1041
00:46:47.119 --> 00:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to use the exact terminology in any single verse. Jesus

1042
00:46:51.000 --> 00:46:54.159
<v Speaker 1>says in John sixteen fifteen that everything that the Father

1043
00:46:54.320 --> 00:46:56.840
<v Speaker 1>has has been given to the Son. That means all

1044
00:46:56.880 --> 00:46:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of his existence, all of his powers, all of his attributes.

1045
00:47:00.119 --> 00:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Son also shares. I answered his question when he asked,

1046
00:47:03.320 --> 00:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what use equal? Yeah, co equal in nature. Hence the

1047
00:47:07.639 --> 00:47:10.719
<v Speaker 1>example of the Father in the Son being distinct persons,

1048
00:47:11.039 --> 00:47:14.599
<v Speaker 1>same in nature, equal in nature. Equal in nature means

1049
00:47:14.599 --> 00:47:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that equal in the power that proceeds from that nature.

1050
00:47:17.159 --> 00:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>So yes, throughout the Gospel of John, every chapter, every book,

1051
00:47:21.920 --> 00:47:24.159
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, every chapter in the Book of John includes

1052
00:47:24.199 --> 00:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a reference to the deed of Christ and or a

1053
00:47:26.559 --> 00:47:29.800
<v Speaker 1>reference to the triad. No goofus. That doesn't mean the

1054
00:47:29.800 --> 00:47:32.519
<v Speaker 1>word trinity is in the book. It means the concept

1055
00:47:32.599 --> 00:47:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the teaching of the Trinity is in the book, just

1056
00:47:34.320 --> 00:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like it's throughout the Old Testament, not the words. It

1057
00:47:36.519 --> 00:47:38.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to have the words. That's your criteria that

1058
00:47:39.000 --> 00:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you are made up for me. Now, I asked you

1059
00:47:41.519 --> 00:47:45.159
<v Speaker 1>a specific question about you going to the text and

1060
00:47:45.199 --> 00:47:49.519
<v Speaker 1>the prior revelation of what your criteria was. You ignored it,

1061
00:47:49.519 --> 00:47:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you didn't answer it. I want to know what is

1062
00:47:51.800 --> 00:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>your criteria for knowing when in the Old Testament it's

1063
00:47:55.280 --> 00:47:57.280
<v Speaker 1>true and when it's false. Is it not the Quran,

1064
00:47:57.360 --> 00:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the very thing in question.

1065
00:48:00.079 --> 00:48:01.960
<v Speaker 7>It's for Lanzwern, all right.

1066
00:48:02.039 --> 00:48:05.000
<v Speaker 8>So clearly he said it is not from a part

1067
00:48:05.000 --> 00:48:06.480
<v Speaker 8>of the things, is derived from everything.

1068
00:48:06.519 --> 00:48:06.880
<v Speaker 2>It is not.

1069
00:48:07.119 --> 00:48:09.199
<v Speaker 8>He's essentially saying it's not clear, which is what we

1070
00:48:09.280 --> 00:48:11.920
<v Speaker 8>love to hear, is that the doctrine of the Trinity

1071
00:48:11.960 --> 00:48:14.519
<v Speaker 8>is not clear in the Bible thattually. That's why I said,

1072
00:48:14.559 --> 00:48:16.880
<v Speaker 8>I can preserve any quotes from church Father in which

1073
00:48:16.920 --> 00:48:18.920
<v Speaker 8>they disagree with one another and what they believe the

1074
00:48:18.920 --> 00:48:20.639
<v Speaker 8>Son was and the Father was. You had all of

1075
00:48:20.679 --> 00:48:23.559
<v Speaker 8>these counsels, You had all of these disagreements, theoretical people

1076
00:48:23.599 --> 00:48:26.440
<v Speaker 8>who were killed because the idea of the Trinity is

1077
00:48:26.480 --> 00:48:27.760
<v Speaker 8>not there. I never asked him for the word. He

1078
00:48:28.239 --> 00:48:29.840
<v Speaker 8>like tried to strow man as I ask him, where

1079
00:48:29.920 --> 00:48:30.480
<v Speaker 8>is the word trinity?

1080
00:48:30.480 --> 00:48:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I never said that.

1081
00:48:31.000 --> 00:48:33.159
<v Speaker 8>I said the concept. That's why I started by defining.

1082
00:48:33.199 --> 00:48:35.440
<v Speaker 8>He didn't answer John seventeen three, because he knows it's

1083
00:48:35.440 --> 00:48:37.440
<v Speaker 8>a thorn in his side.

1084
00:48:37.480 --> 00:48:38.519
<v Speaker 2>When I said, Jesus.

1085
00:48:38.239 --> 00:48:40.800
<v Speaker 8>Said the only true God is the Father, he did

1086
00:48:40.880 --> 00:48:42.920
<v Speaker 8>not respond to that, or he completely ignored it. I

1087
00:48:42.920 --> 00:48:45.079
<v Speaker 8>responded to his question about the verses, which verses I

1088
00:48:45.079 --> 00:48:47.960
<v Speaker 8>said to you, I ever agrees with Islam generally, Alan

1089
00:48:48.000 --> 00:48:50.039
<v Speaker 8>had it, we will accept that this statement is true.

1090
00:48:50.119 --> 00:48:50.760
<v Speaker 2>So when it says in.

1091
00:48:50.800 --> 00:48:53.199
<v Speaker 8>John and the Shrowby sixty four that there's one God,

1092
00:48:53.280 --> 00:48:54.079
<v Speaker 8>we except that it's true.

1093
00:48:54.159 --> 00:48:54.599
<v Speaker 2>No problem.

1094
00:48:54.760 --> 00:48:57.159
<v Speaker 8>Anything which would disagree we were rejected. Like if something

1095
00:48:57.199 --> 00:48:59.599
<v Speaker 8>says Jesus died, we could say that it's also is corrupted.

1096
00:49:00.199 --> 00:49:03.480
<v Speaker 8>Change now, lad By, Because scholars agree that the Bible

1097
00:49:03.480 --> 00:49:05.280
<v Speaker 8>has been corrupted, I don't need to do any a

1098
00:49:05.320 --> 00:49:07.559
<v Speaker 8>lot of research regarding that. Now, what you said the

1099
00:49:07.599 --> 00:49:10.679
<v Speaker 8>God's words doesn't change. Change that verse you quote. It

1100
00:49:10.920 --> 00:49:14.159
<v Speaker 8>is talking about a lost promise, and you're quoting it

1101
00:49:13.599 --> 00:49:13.920
<v Speaker 8>out of.

1102
00:49:15.480 --> 00:49:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Context.

1103
00:49:15.960 --> 00:49:17.519
<v Speaker 8>Is like I said, I don't change my words. I

1104
00:49:17.599 --> 00:49:19.719
<v Speaker 8>keep my words. We're talking about promises. We're not talking

1105
00:49:19.760 --> 00:49:22.360
<v Speaker 8>about the revelation of the previous structures, because the Kuran

1106
00:49:22.440 --> 00:49:25.559
<v Speaker 8>already explains that the revelation of the previous scriptures has

1107
00:49:25.599 --> 00:49:27.639
<v Speaker 8>been changed. Now he said whatever the Father has been

1108
00:49:27.639 --> 00:49:29.719
<v Speaker 8>given been given to me. That's clearly not the case,

1109
00:49:29.719 --> 00:49:31.599
<v Speaker 8>because Jesus did not know, and he said he didn't know,

1110
00:49:31.679 --> 00:49:33.119
<v Speaker 8>and he said only the Father knows. And what he

1111
00:49:33.159 --> 00:49:35.039
<v Speaker 8>means by that is not talking about attributes.

1112
00:49:36.039 --> 00:49:37.480
<v Speaker 7>Perfect Jay ninety seconds.

1113
00:49:37.760 --> 00:49:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I notice he did not answer the exact challenge

1114
00:49:40.159 --> 00:49:42.559
<v Speaker 1>I gave him. I asked him what the epistemic criteria was,

1115
00:49:42.920 --> 00:49:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and he said that the Quran backs up the promises

1116
00:49:46.280 --> 00:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of prior revelation when it's worth So, in other words,

1117
00:49:48.400 --> 00:49:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the Quran proves the Quran by citing the Quran passages

1118
00:49:52.000 --> 00:49:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Old Testament. And yet we read in the

1119
00:49:54.559 --> 00:49:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Quran that it actually says that you can go to

1120
00:49:57.679 --> 00:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the prior revelation to see that the new rebelation is

1121
00:50:00.519 --> 00:50:03.199
<v Speaker 1>consistent with it. We have revealed to you a prophet,

1122
00:50:03.239 --> 00:50:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the Book of truth, confirmation in the previous scriptures, and

1123
00:50:07.199 --> 00:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a supreme authority upon them. So you judge between them

1124
00:50:11.000 --> 00:50:14.760
<v Speaker 1>what Allah has revealed. And now he's admitting what was

1125
00:50:14.800 --> 00:50:19.119
<v Speaker 1>his source. Many scholars say the Bible's corrupted. Oh really,

1126
00:50:19.239 --> 00:50:22.519
<v Speaker 1>so many scholars who are atheist unbelieving. Is what you

1127
00:50:22.639 --> 00:50:25.199
<v Speaker 1>go to, not to your prophet Muhammad, who said that

1128
00:50:25.239 --> 00:50:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you can go to the prior Jewish Torah scriptures and

1129
00:50:28.039 --> 00:50:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Christian scriptures. Those scriptures confirm supposedly what's in the Qoran.

1130
00:50:33.159 --> 00:50:36.039
<v Speaker 1>You just said, no, they're all corrupt. So Allah and

1131
00:50:36.239 --> 00:50:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Muhammad are directing me to go to a corrupt book

1132
00:50:39.480 --> 00:50:41.559
<v Speaker 1>to prove your book. You don't see how silly that is.

1133
00:50:41.559 --> 00:50:43.559
<v Speaker 1>And then when I ask you for a standard, you said,

1134
00:50:43.559 --> 00:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the standard is the Koran. But the thing in question

1135
00:50:45.920 --> 00:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is the Koran. So you're in a circ gole, a

1136
00:50:49.000 --> 00:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>circ goal. And it's a fallacy to appeal to authorities

1137
00:50:52.000 --> 00:50:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to say we all know the boby, let's come up.

1138
00:50:53.320 --> 00:50:55.320
<v Speaker 1>That that's a fallacy. I know you guys don't know

1139
00:50:55.320 --> 00:50:59.639
<v Speaker 1>what fallacies are the Haram in Islam, logical fallacies, right,

1140
00:51:00.639 --> 00:51:01.559
<v Speaker 1>logic is haram?

1141
00:51:01.639 --> 00:51:03.559
<v Speaker 3>So uh, what's the standard again?

1142
00:51:06.119 --> 00:51:07.880
<v Speaker 7>Okay? Ninety seconds for a muscle lantern?

1143
00:51:08.639 --> 00:51:10.880
<v Speaker 2>And he said, I think givemcretia. I clearly did.

1144
00:51:10.920 --> 00:51:13.039
<v Speaker 8>I said, to agree with the crad had it it is,

1145
00:51:13.079 --> 00:51:14.880
<v Speaker 8>we accepted, wheree to reject it.

1146
00:51:14.920 --> 00:51:18.159
<v Speaker 2>He said, proves nobody here is talking about proving the Kran.

1147
00:51:18.440 --> 00:51:22.440
<v Speaker 8>Nobody's also talking about the Koran proving the Bible.

1148
00:51:22.480 --> 00:51:25.480
<v Speaker 2>You just misunderstanding things here, and you're just completing terms

1149
00:51:25.480 --> 00:51:26.800
<v Speaker 2>and you're just going around in circle.

1150
00:51:26.840 --> 00:51:29.400
<v Speaker 8>Nobody's talking about anything proving anything. I already explained to

1151
00:51:29.440 --> 00:51:31.280
<v Speaker 8>you what the word confirmed there means. You clearly don't

1152
00:51:31.320 --> 00:51:33.559
<v Speaker 8>understand what you're saying. There's nothing there that says that

1153
00:51:33.679 --> 00:51:35.719
<v Speaker 8>is proving it the verst you that is refreating you

1154
00:51:35.800 --> 00:51:36.480
<v Speaker 8>mentioned refuty.

1155
00:51:36.519 --> 00:51:38.360
<v Speaker 2>I was laughing, how could you read this verse? I

1156
00:51:38.360 --> 00:51:39.360
<v Speaker 2>think is supporting you.

1157
00:51:39.519 --> 00:51:41.679
<v Speaker 8>First of all, the chapter five of the krevers forty eight,

1158
00:51:41.719 --> 00:51:43.920
<v Speaker 8>which you were reading, is refuting you. It is literally

1159
00:51:44.000 --> 00:51:46.360
<v Speaker 8>saying to judge between them with the Khoran with what

1160
00:51:46.400 --> 00:51:47.840
<v Speaker 8>all was revealed to you, and do not listen to

1161
00:51:47.880 --> 00:51:48.519
<v Speaker 8>their desires.

1162
00:51:48.639 --> 00:51:49.960
<v Speaker 2>And the next verse is the same thing.

1163
00:51:50.159 --> 00:51:52.320
<v Speaker 8>And you read yourself for this is a supreme authority

1164
00:51:52.360 --> 00:51:55.119
<v Speaker 8>over it, which means that whatever the horrandic say dictates

1165
00:51:55.400 --> 00:51:57.519
<v Speaker 8>is a supreme authority over the Bible. That's exactly what

1166
00:51:57.519 --> 00:51:59.719
<v Speaker 8>I've been saying all this time. And I'm laughing, how

1167
00:51:59.760 --> 00:52:02.519
<v Speaker 8>could you read that verse? I think that's supporting you. Now,

1168
00:52:02.679 --> 00:52:07.000
<v Speaker 8>this is just is completely ridiculous. So now the Koran

1169
00:52:07.400 --> 00:52:08.679
<v Speaker 8>says it's also corrupted.

1170
00:52:08.719 --> 00:52:10.199
<v Speaker 2>It's mentioned in multiple parts.

1171
00:52:10.239 --> 00:52:12.639
<v Speaker 8>For example, the Koran says in chapter two, verse seventy five,

1172
00:52:12.920 --> 00:52:15.199
<v Speaker 8>and mentioned in chapter two, verse seventeen, how did write

1173
00:52:15.199 --> 00:52:16.800
<v Speaker 8>the scripture of their own hand? And the claim it

1174
00:52:16.840 --> 00:52:18.639
<v Speaker 8>is from God? You said logic is harm? Nobody said

1175
00:52:18.679 --> 00:52:20.960
<v Speaker 8>anything about logic is harm. Again, coming back to seventeen,

1176
00:52:23.239 --> 00:52:24.360
<v Speaker 8>John seventeen.

1177
00:52:24.000 --> 00:52:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Verse three.

1178
00:52:25.559 --> 00:52:28.360
<v Speaker 8>What he explicitly says the only true Again, you're avoiding

1179
00:52:28.360 --> 00:52:30.239
<v Speaker 8>the question. You're running away from the question. Also, we

1180
00:52:30.320 --> 00:52:33.760
<v Speaker 8>haven't joined chapter twenty. Since he has a god, he says,

1181
00:52:33.760 --> 00:52:35.199
<v Speaker 8>I'm going back to my God and your God. So

1182
00:52:35.199 --> 00:52:36.519
<v Speaker 8>how can you be God? And you have a god?

1183
00:52:36.519 --> 00:52:38.000
<v Speaker 8>He didn't say I have a person. I have a father.

1184
00:52:38.199 --> 00:52:39.880
<v Speaker 8>He said Father and God. So he has a god

1185
00:52:39.880 --> 00:52:41.920
<v Speaker 8>above him, and he believes the only true God is

1186
00:52:41.920 --> 00:52:43.840
<v Speaker 8>the Father. And he doesn't have the knowledge of the hour.

1187
00:52:43.880 --> 00:52:45.480
<v Speaker 8>And this is what we mean by him not being

1188
00:52:45.480 --> 00:52:46.159
<v Speaker 8>equal to the Father.

1189
00:52:46.559 --> 00:52:49.119
<v Speaker 7>Okay, j ninety seconds and then after this or go Jay,

1190
00:52:49.119 --> 00:52:51.360
<v Speaker 7>then lantern ninety second station. Now we could do closing

1191
00:52:51.360 --> 00:52:55.280
<v Speaker 7>statements finishing with a Muslim lanstern because Jay DIYer started,

1192
00:52:55.320 --> 00:52:56.599
<v Speaker 7>So let's go ninety seconds Jay.

1193
00:52:56.599 --> 00:52:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Now.

1194
00:52:57.039 --> 00:52:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The argument in both of those passages is not

1195
00:52:59.440 --> 00:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>judge the revelation on the Quran. The argument is that

1196
00:53:02.840 --> 00:53:06.599
<v Speaker 1>they that you can go again to eighty five. The

1197
00:53:06.639 --> 00:53:08.559
<v Speaker 1>messenger believes in what has been revealed to him is

1198
00:53:08.559 --> 00:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>from his lords, so do all the believers, his angels

1199
00:53:11.519 --> 00:53:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and his books, the books that are referenced in many

1200
00:53:14.519 --> 00:53:17.199
<v Speaker 1>other passages as well. This includes six one point fifteen

1201
00:53:17.519 --> 00:53:21.519
<v Speaker 1>eighteen twenty seven. These are the words of Allah previously

1202
00:53:21.559 --> 00:53:24.559
<v Speaker 1>in the Torah and the Angel They cannot be corrupted

1203
00:53:24.599 --> 00:53:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and changed. He believes they're corupted and changed. Why because

1204
00:53:27.440 --> 00:53:31.760
<v Speaker 1>atheist scholars said so. And guess what, the same atheist

1205
00:53:31.840 --> 00:53:34.800
<v Speaker 1>scholars don't believe in his books and his Quran. They

1206
00:53:34.840 --> 00:53:37.119
<v Speaker 1>are all the time reject So it's a double standard.

1207
00:53:37.159 --> 00:53:39.239
<v Speaker 1>They always do this. They have a double standard of

1208
00:53:39.280 --> 00:53:42.360
<v Speaker 1>citing the atheist scholars who reject the Bible but also

1209
00:53:42.480 --> 00:53:45.760
<v Speaker 1>reject the Quran. And your Kuran does say many times

1210
00:53:45.800 --> 00:53:48.559
<v Speaker 1>over that I can go and check the previous revelation

1211
00:53:48.679 --> 00:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to be consistent, and then when we find out that

1212
00:53:51.000 --> 00:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not consistent, you say, oh, that's because it's corrupted.

1213
00:53:54.960 --> 00:53:57.079
<v Speaker 1>So I'm supposed to look at a corrupted thing to

1214
00:53:57.199 --> 00:53:59.960
<v Speaker 1>confirm in a non corrupted thing. That makes no sense.

1215
00:54:00.320 --> 00:54:02.679
<v Speaker 1>That's why when I said, what's the epistemic criteria to

1216
00:54:02.719 --> 00:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>know the Koran is true? He said, the Koran that's

1217
00:54:05.960 --> 00:54:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a circle. You explicitly affirmed the very thing I wanted

1218
00:54:09.199 --> 00:54:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to affirm that it is a circle.

1219
00:54:11.000 --> 00:54:12.559
<v Speaker 3>You said, no one wants to know that one's asking

1220
00:54:12.639 --> 00:54:13.000
<v Speaker 3>what's true.

1221
00:54:13.039 --> 00:54:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking how do we know it's true? What do

1222
00:54:14.519 --> 00:54:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you mean?

1223
00:54:14.760 --> 00:54:15.960
<v Speaker 3>No one's asking this question.

1224
00:54:16.000 --> 00:54:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking you this question for the third time. How

1225
00:54:18.280 --> 00:54:20.559
<v Speaker 1>do we know it's true? And in regard to in

1226
00:54:20.599 --> 00:54:24.079
<v Speaker 1>regard to John seventeen three, I said, monarchical trinitarianism, Jesus

1227
00:54:24.119 --> 00:54:26.039
<v Speaker 1>does submit to the Father. That doesn't mean he has

1228
00:54:26.039 --> 00:54:27.719
<v Speaker 1>a different nature than the Father, any more than a

1229
00:54:27.800 --> 00:54:29.280
<v Speaker 1>son sub maody to a father means he has a

1230
00:54:29.280 --> 00:54:29.880
<v Speaker 1>different nature.

1231
00:54:31.800 --> 00:54:35.280
<v Speaker 8>Okay, for ninety seconds, amazing you saw he jumped from

1232
00:54:35.280 --> 00:54:36.920
<v Speaker 8>another verse of book because he realized that.

1233
00:54:38.119 --> 00:54:39.599
<v Speaker 1>There's also both.

1234
00:54:41.360 --> 00:54:44.320
<v Speaker 8>I know he's interesting because he knows he's being and

1235
00:54:44.679 --> 00:54:46.400
<v Speaker 8>the other verse that he also has nothing to do

1236
00:54:46.440 --> 00:54:47.599
<v Speaker 8>with what you're saying is believe.

1237
00:54:48.000 --> 00:54:50.519
<v Speaker 2>One of the bores is the books, to the books.

1238
00:54:50.239 --> 00:54:52.920
<v Speaker 8>That are previous revelations that have been reviewsed, to previous prophets.

1239
00:54:52.920 --> 00:54:53.400
<v Speaker 2>When we talk.

1240
00:54:53.320 --> 00:54:57.639
<v Speaker 8>About that, and you can you can read it in

1241
00:54:57.679 --> 00:54:59.119
<v Speaker 8>context and everyone can read that.

1242
00:54:59.199 --> 00:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And you can read the talk.

1243
00:55:00.039 --> 00:55:01.039
<v Speaker 2>You will see it's talking.

1244
00:55:01.559 --> 00:55:03.239
<v Speaker 8>You can read it and you can see it's expecially

1245
00:55:03.280 --> 00:55:04.960
<v Speaker 8>talking about the problems for like, you see how interrupting

1246
00:55:04.960 --> 00:55:06.880
<v Speaker 8>he is because you know he's being destroyed. Now it's

1247
00:55:07.039 --> 00:55:09.159
<v Speaker 8>if if the scholars since the Bible is yes, so

1248
00:55:09.199 --> 00:55:11.360
<v Speaker 8>you agree, I'm happy we agree that the scholars and

1249
00:55:11.400 --> 00:55:14.000
<v Speaker 8>academy agree that the Bible has been changed, corrupting, there's

1250
00:55:14.000 --> 00:55:17.800
<v Speaker 8>no original, etcetera. Now these same eighties scholars and in academy,

1251
00:55:17.800 --> 00:55:19.360
<v Speaker 8>you will see that they admit that I've made views

1252
00:55:19.360 --> 00:55:21.480
<v Speaker 8>about this before. How the Kuran is preserved. You have

1253
00:55:21.519 --> 00:55:24.639
<v Speaker 8>doctor and Jeric and units is not almostly articologue.

1254
00:55:24.639 --> 00:55:25.320
<v Speaker 2>You have many people I.

1255
00:55:25.280 --> 00:55:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Can mention now Jerr boy, I can mention many miniy

1256
00:55:27.320 --> 00:55:29.239
<v Speaker 8>names of different people who do believe. Or if you

1257
00:55:29.280 --> 00:55:31.679
<v Speaker 8>sort almost but academic that the Koran is preserved, there's

1258
00:55:31.679 --> 00:55:34.079
<v Speaker 8>a whole book stritten on that. On the manuscripts, for example,

1259
00:55:34.159 --> 00:55:35.679
<v Speaker 8>I'm Manu script and how they show the preservation of

1260
00:55:35.719 --> 00:55:38.239
<v Speaker 8>the craw Koran. Never said the Bible is consistent. You're saying,

1261
00:55:38.280 --> 00:55:39.199
<v Speaker 8>we've been talking about the.

1262
00:55:40.840 --> 00:55:41.559
<v Speaker 2>How to prove a Karan.

1263
00:55:41.599 --> 00:55:43.599
<v Speaker 8>We never talked about talking about the Bible is corrupt

1264
00:55:43.639 --> 00:55:45.480
<v Speaker 8>has nothing to do with proving the cra Proving the

1265
00:55:45.559 --> 00:55:47.400
<v Speaker 8>Kuran has a I have a video of my channel.

1266
00:55:47.400 --> 00:55:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Everyone is welcome to watch. Call.

1267
00:55:48.800 --> 00:55:51.079
<v Speaker 8>Competic evidence is for the truth for this or we

1268
00:55:51.079 --> 00:55:52.599
<v Speaker 8>see the prophecies in the Koran. And how do you

1269
00:55:52.639 --> 00:55:53.960
<v Speaker 8>to say all of these different things. I don't know

1270
00:55:53.960 --> 00:55:55.719
<v Speaker 8>what you mean by proving. Maybe you're talking about different things.

1271
00:55:56.039 --> 00:55:59.400
<v Speaker 8>Now we are talking about the corruption of the Bible.

1272
00:55:59.480 --> 00:56:01.719
<v Speaker 8>The Bible has been changed. Why would been corrupted? Is

1273
00:56:01.719 --> 00:56:04.239
<v Speaker 8>accepted in academia. I'm happy you through your whole religion

1274
00:56:04.320 --> 00:56:06.039
<v Speaker 8>under the post all. I agree that the Son is

1275
00:56:06.039 --> 00:56:08.840
<v Speaker 8>subordinate to the Father, and I want Christians to listen

1276
00:56:08.840 --> 00:56:10.920
<v Speaker 8>to this. He's through everything other of us. He said, yes,

1277
00:56:10.920 --> 00:56:12.960
<v Speaker 8>we agree, is abordinate to the Father. Excellent, that's what

1278
00:56:12.960 --> 00:56:15.440
<v Speaker 8>we believe. It is Muslim Jesus is submitting to the Father.

1279
00:56:15.519 --> 00:56:17.840
<v Speaker 8>That's what a Muslim is. A perfect Mohamed was submitting

1280
00:56:17.840 --> 00:56:19.079
<v Speaker 8>to a lot and that he is Muslim.

1281
00:56:19.159 --> 00:56:23.360
<v Speaker 7>Is ok to Jay. Let's do uh five minutes each,

1282
00:56:23.679 --> 00:56:25.519
<v Speaker 7>five minutes for Jay and then five minutes for Muslims.

1283
00:56:25.519 --> 00:56:26.440
<v Speaker 7>Will wrap it up here.

1284
00:56:26.719 --> 00:56:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, six one fifteen. Again, neither of the passages that

1285
00:56:30.199 --> 00:56:33.079
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about confirm what he's saying. Six one fifteen.

1286
00:56:33.119 --> 00:56:35.880
<v Speaker 1>The word of the Lord is perfected in truth and justice.

1287
00:56:35.960 --> 00:56:40.119
<v Speaker 1>None can change Allah's words. He just admitted that the

1288
00:56:40.239 --> 00:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>words of a law in the previous passages. You heard

1289
00:56:42.519 --> 00:56:45.639
<v Speaker 1>him say in the last section there that no those verses,

1290
00:56:45.679 --> 00:56:48.159
<v Speaker 1>those verses of the books, the message that's talking about

1291
00:56:48.159 --> 00:56:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the previous revelations of the prophets, which he just said,

1292
00:56:50.719 --> 00:56:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is corrupted when his own Koran says, the word of

1293
00:56:54.000 --> 00:56:57.039
<v Speaker 1>a law right there cannot ever be corrupted. So he's

1294
00:56:57.079 --> 00:56:59.760
<v Speaker 1>smarter than a law and the prophet according to his

1295
00:57:00.079 --> 00:57:04.199
<v Speaker 1>attachment to unbelieving scholars. What I pointed out was his

1296
00:57:04.320 --> 00:57:06.880
<v Speaker 1>double standard and the fact that he's going to appeal

1297
00:57:06.920 --> 00:57:08.599
<v Speaker 1>to the same scholars. Oh, but there's a bunch of

1298
00:57:08.599 --> 00:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>other scholars that like the Quran. This is a fallacy

1299
00:57:10.960 --> 00:57:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of authority. Appealing to scholars is a fallacy of authority.

1300
00:57:14.000 --> 00:57:16.440
<v Speaker 1>If you think that proves a position, you argue that

1301
00:57:16.440 --> 00:57:18.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of scholars that debate the early Church,

1302
00:57:19.000 --> 00:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So what that has nothing to do with proving a position.

1303
00:57:21.599 --> 00:57:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You could bring in scholars to back up a position,

1304
00:57:24.119 --> 00:57:26.760
<v Speaker 1>but they don't prove anything. That's called the fallacy of

1305
00:57:26.800 --> 00:57:31.119
<v Speaker 1>appeal to authority. So multiple times he's made countless fallacies.

1306
00:57:31.119 --> 00:57:33.400
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't even know what they are. I point them out,

1307
00:57:33.440 --> 00:57:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and he laughs and talks past it. He appealed to.

1308
00:57:35.960 --> 00:57:38.280
<v Speaker 1>He said that I made many fallacies talking about this

1309
00:57:38.400 --> 00:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>problem of Allah's relationship to his attributes a one in

1310
00:57:41.039 --> 00:57:43.320
<v Speaker 1>many which, by the way, he believes in an uncreated

1311
00:57:43.320 --> 00:57:44.559
<v Speaker 1>foot and uncreated shin if.

1312
00:57:44.440 --> 00:57:45.079
<v Speaker 3>He's a Salafi.

1313
00:57:45.280 --> 00:57:47.599
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't, then he has to metaphorically interpret those things.

1314
00:57:47.719 --> 00:57:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, now, he's afforded the ability to metaphorically

1315
00:57:50.719 --> 00:57:53.840
<v Speaker 1>interpretate interpret these texts, but he doesn't grant that to

1316
00:57:53.960 --> 00:57:56.440
<v Speaker 1>us when we talk about these passages where Jesus clearly

1317
00:57:56.559 --> 00:57:59.679
<v Speaker 1>uses rhetoric, clearly uses exaggeration. No, no, no, we're not allowed

1318
00:57:59.679 --> 00:58:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And by the way, he did try

1319
00:58:01.800 --> 00:58:04.519
<v Speaker 1>to say that I have to prove in John one

1320
00:58:04.639 --> 00:58:08.079
<v Speaker 1>because there's no mention of three hypostass Hypostasis is mentioned

1321
00:58:08.079 --> 00:58:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Hebrews one, where it's identified that the son is

1322
00:58:11.119 --> 00:58:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the eternal son of the Father and he's equally divine.

1323
00:58:14.519 --> 00:58:18.239
<v Speaker 1>He constantly misunderstood what monarchical trinitarianism is because he doesn't

1324
00:58:18.280 --> 00:58:21.639
<v Speaker 1>know what it is. Because it recognizes this distinction between

1325
00:58:21.639 --> 00:58:24.079
<v Speaker 1>the father and the son in terms of monarchia, that

1326
00:58:24.159 --> 00:58:26.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that there's a difference in essence. So his

1327
00:58:26.880 --> 00:58:30.280
<v Speaker 1>whole argumentation, this entire time was assuming that distinction between

1328
00:58:30.280 --> 00:58:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the persons necessarily and tells the distinction of or a

1329
00:58:33.360 --> 00:58:36.119
<v Speaker 1>diminution of essence, which I said from the very opening

1330
00:58:36.199 --> 00:58:40.119
<v Speaker 1>statement is not our position. So again, Allah's words are

1331
00:58:40.159 --> 00:58:44.559
<v Speaker 1>not corruptible. He believes they've been corrupted. Allah is one,

1332
00:58:45.000 --> 00:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But you heard him use analogies to the blackness of

1333
00:58:47.440 --> 00:58:51.559
<v Speaker 1>his shirt to help me. But his own Kuran says

1334
00:58:51.559 --> 00:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that Allah is nothing like things in creation. I'm pretty

1335
00:58:54.400 --> 00:58:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sure your shirt is a creature. I'm pretty sure black

1336
00:58:57.159 --> 00:58:59.559
<v Speaker 1>is a part or an attribute of a shirt. So

1337
00:58:59.599 --> 00:59:03.800
<v Speaker 1>your own analogies refute you. And that's why I'm constantly

1338
00:59:03.840 --> 00:59:06.679
<v Speaker 1>calling you out on a double standard. I'm not saying

1339
00:59:06.760 --> 00:59:09.599
<v Speaker 1>you don't answer by stating your position, but like many

1340
00:59:09.599 --> 00:59:12.039
<v Speaker 1>people who are no good at debate, you think answering

1341
00:59:12.159 --> 00:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>your position is refuting an argument, calling out a contradiction.

1342
00:59:17.480 --> 00:59:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm arguing your position contradicts. I'm not asking you to

1343
00:59:21.119 --> 00:59:25.320
<v Speaker 1>restate the position. I'm saying your position contradicts in many ways.

1344
00:59:25.920 --> 00:59:29.480
<v Speaker 1>These things contradict. The word of Allah cannot be corrupted

1345
00:59:29.519 --> 00:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>or changed. You just said the prior revelations were corrupted

1346
00:59:32.280 --> 00:59:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and changed.

1347
00:59:35.559 --> 00:59:38.639
<v Speaker 7>Okay, I'll give a final statement to muscle lantern. He

1348
00:59:38.639 --> 00:59:40.559
<v Speaker 7>went around three minutes. If you can keep it three

1349
00:59:40.639 --> 00:59:41.679
<v Speaker 7>to four, I think to be fair.

1350
00:59:42.119 --> 00:59:43.679
<v Speaker 2>All good, no problem, All right.

1351
00:59:43.719 --> 00:59:46.079
<v Speaker 8>So you mentioned chapter six of the Paran, and as

1352
00:59:46.079 --> 00:59:48.559
<v Speaker 8>I said, already, there's two only two business. Lefron talks

1353
00:59:48.559 --> 00:59:50.960
<v Speaker 8>about Doors of a Life chapter six and another chapter

1354
00:59:51.079 --> 00:59:52.199
<v Speaker 8>the cap chapter eighteen.

1355
00:59:51.920 --> 00:59:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Of the Pran.

1356
00:59:52.400 --> 00:59:54.599
<v Speaker 8>One explicitly talks about the Kurran mentions the AA the

1357
00:59:54.679 --> 00:59:57.639
<v Speaker 8>verses of a lot, specifically referring to the Koran, and

1358
00:59:57.679 --> 01:00:00.199
<v Speaker 8>the other one, which he quoted in six, is talks

1359
01:00:00.440 --> 01:00:02.079
<v Speaker 8>It talks about the judgment and the promise of all

1360
01:00:02.159 --> 01:00:02.559
<v Speaker 8>How do you know?

1361
01:00:02.639 --> 01:00:04.519
<v Speaker 2>Read the verse before a lot of the justices in.

1362
01:00:06.519 --> 01:00:07.920
<v Speaker 8>Is there any judge that I will take other than

1363
01:00:07.920 --> 01:00:10.159
<v Speaker 8>a lot talking about the judgment of a lot? And

1364
01:00:10.199 --> 01:00:14.599
<v Speaker 8>then it says that that with and the promise of

1365
01:00:14.639 --> 01:00:16.320
<v Speaker 8>your order the world, the judgment of your world has

1366
01:00:16.360 --> 01:00:18.559
<v Speaker 8>been fulfilled. What he's not talking about, I'm talking about

1367
01:00:18.639 --> 01:00:20.920
<v Speaker 8>versus definitely not talking about.

1368
01:00:23.039 --> 01:00:29.239
<v Speaker 9>Because I've already says Lion says, don't cry, don't cry,

1369
01:00:29.559 --> 01:00:38.000
<v Speaker 9>don't cry. Mute him by the way, he's you should

1370
01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:40.320
<v Speaker 9>other than I let you speak, You should be.

1371
01:00:43.159 --> 01:00:43.480
<v Speaker 7>Your time.

1372
01:00:45.159 --> 01:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Can you please mute him because he's going to try.

1373
01:00:47.320 --> 01:00:50.719
<v Speaker 8>And all right, okay, so again we'll say this is very,

1374
01:00:50.840 --> 01:00:53.320
<v Speaker 8>very very simply the verse of the Koran.

1375
01:00:53.119 --> 01:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned it.

1376
01:00:53.960 --> 01:00:56.880
<v Speaker 8>I mentioned the verse and opening excisions, open excsures of

1377
01:00:56.880 --> 01:00:59.760
<v Speaker 8>the scholars. Nobody have said in Islamic history that this

1378
01:00:59.800 --> 01:01:02.280
<v Speaker 8>is fairy to the previous scriptures. And I give evidences

1379
01:01:02.280 --> 01:01:03.880
<v Speaker 8>why this is not referring to the previous scriptures, that

1380
01:01:03.920 --> 01:01:05.159
<v Speaker 8>they are corrupt, and I give evidences.

1381
01:01:05.199 --> 01:01:07.519
<v Speaker 2>He give it evidence by himself. Take the verse in

1382
01:01:07.559 --> 01:01:08.079
<v Speaker 2>chapter five.

1383
01:01:08.119 --> 01:01:10.559
<v Speaker 8>Also, I give chapter to seventy five.

1384
01:01:11.760 --> 01:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Which is clearly this guy doesn't know what he's talking about.

1385
01:01:13.960 --> 01:01:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Now he said, oh, we do metaphors, win did they

1386
01:01:15.800 --> 01:01:17.960
<v Speaker 2>do it before? Or if you're this, if you you

1387
01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:19.559
<v Speaker 2>don't even know what I am, that's that's the problem.

1388
01:01:19.559 --> 01:01:20.239
<v Speaker 2>You come to argue it.

1389
01:01:20.239 --> 01:01:22.039
<v Speaker 3>But you don't stay where you are. You don't stay

1390
01:01:22.039 --> 01:01:22.480
<v Speaker 3>where you are.

1391
01:01:23.719 --> 01:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I only stay I'm a Muslim. I don't do other

1392
01:01:25.960 --> 01:01:26.599
<v Speaker 2>than that.

1393
01:01:26.599 --> 01:01:30.679
<v Speaker 3>That's deceptive. You're not You're not they do this as why.

1394
01:01:31.280 --> 01:01:33.960
<v Speaker 10>He knows that's a deception.

1395
01:01:34.199 --> 01:01:37.639
<v Speaker 2>It's not like he doesn't understand this. He doesn't understand that.

1396
01:01:38.199 --> 01:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>He's freaking out because you got what.

1397
01:01:39.960 --> 01:01:42.519
<v Speaker 8>We call UK waffle in the UK, it's just someone

1398
01:01:42.519 --> 01:01:43.559
<v Speaker 8>waffle's few words.

1399
01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:46.239
<v Speaker 2>He thinks he's making big words. We can confuse the audience.

1400
01:01:46.320 --> 01:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Will never answer any objection, and he's not allowed to.

1401
01:01:49.880 --> 01:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You have to have a school. There's no no, no

1402
01:01:53.039 --> 01:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>school or another. So he's actually he's actually acting doesn't

1403
01:01:57.400 --> 01:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>have so.

1404
01:01:58.239 --> 01:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>There's no contradiction. So I was refuting him.

1405
01:02:00.039 --> 01:02:01.760
<v Speaker 8>Came to the black and white shirt and all I

1406
01:02:01.760 --> 01:02:03.920
<v Speaker 8>already told him this analogy to do with the attributes,

1407
01:02:03.920 --> 01:02:04.960
<v Speaker 8>not to do with a loss, So do not.

1408
01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not trying to say.

1409
01:02:05.679 --> 01:02:06.320
<v Speaker 7>The shirt is a lot.

1410
01:02:06.360 --> 01:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>It's an analogy to anything, and the analogy doesn't do anything.

1411
01:02:11.760 --> 01:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>That's look, Jay left defending this guy. He's supported. He

1412
01:02:16.079 --> 01:02:17.079
<v Speaker 2>started to use some morefully.

1413
01:02:17.119 --> 01:02:19.519
<v Speaker 8>All the essence is not as that it doesn't matter

1414
01:02:19.639 --> 01:02:22.920
<v Speaker 8>what we can see scriptures, because before all of this.

1415
01:02:22.880 --> 01:02:24.159
<v Speaker 2>Philosophy have been introduced.

1416
01:02:24.719 --> 01:02:28.400
<v Speaker 8>Now it's phil is that clearly Jesus was supported, and

1417
01:02:28.440 --> 01:02:30.280
<v Speaker 8>that's why we have the earliest groups like the United

1418
01:02:30.320 --> 01:02:34.840
<v Speaker 8>and did not believe that traditarian believes we have the

1419
01:02:34.920 --> 01:02:35.440
<v Speaker 8>Church fathers.

1420
01:02:35.440 --> 01:02:36.880
<v Speaker 2>And I said, I can easily.

1421
01:02:36.559 --> 01:02:39.239
<v Speaker 8>Give more quotes that they didn't agree on the concept

1422
01:02:39.239 --> 01:02:41.920
<v Speaker 8>that Jay has in his mind. So simply Ja has

1423
01:02:41.960 --> 01:02:44.960
<v Speaker 8>put Jesus under the bus from a position that he

1424
01:02:44.960 --> 01:02:47.480
<v Speaker 8>believes in the trinity. And he clearly admitted he doesn't

1425
01:02:47.519 --> 01:02:49.079
<v Speaker 8>know the hour. It is not the same. I think

1426
01:02:49.119 --> 01:02:50.960
<v Speaker 8>it's just contradicting himself. It is he doesn't know the hour,

1427
01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:52.800
<v Speaker 8>but in the same time, they're not equally this is

1428
01:02:52.840 --> 01:02:54.360
<v Speaker 8>but at the same time they're the same. But he

1429
01:02:54.480 --> 01:02:56.679
<v Speaker 8>just keeps contradicting himself and going in the same circle.

1430
01:02:56.840 --> 01:02:58.679
<v Speaker 8>So is it the four He doesn't really know the

1431
01:02:58.679 --> 01:03:01.119
<v Speaker 8>hour and they're supported into what he doesn't know his

1432
01:03:01.119 --> 01:03:01.840
<v Speaker 8>own positions.

1433
01:03:01.880 --> 01:03:05.199
<v Speaker 1>And with that I answered everything that nobody's bonding.

1434
01:03:05.119 --> 01:03:07.599
<v Speaker 8>Except the Lord of Jesus, who he said he's coming

1435
01:03:07.639 --> 01:03:09.199
<v Speaker 8>back to, say, going back to my God. We asked

1436
01:03:09.239 --> 01:03:11.400
<v Speaker 8>you to worship that lord that Jesus came to, and

1437
01:03:11.400 --> 01:03:12.880
<v Speaker 8>he said he's going to worship. He's going to go

1438
01:03:12.920 --> 01:03:14.320
<v Speaker 8>back to. That is the Lord that we called you

1439
01:03:14.360 --> 01:03:16.559
<v Speaker 8>to worship. The Lord of Jesus most is not profect.

1440
01:03:16.599 --> 01:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Muhammad, and peace be upon all of the prophets and messengers.

1441
01:03:19.039 --> 01:03:22.000
<v Speaker 8>And I'll conclude here with this cooking and because it's

1442
01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:25.960
<v Speaker 8>burning in the kitchen now, all right, person.

1443
01:03:26.639 --> 01:03:29.280
<v Speaker 7>Hold on, Jay, I want to get because he we

1444
01:03:29.800 --> 01:03:32.400
<v Speaker 7>there was interruptions. I did said that it was going

1445
01:03:32.440 --> 01:03:34.199
<v Speaker 7>to be the closing statements, but because it seems like

1446
01:03:34.199 --> 01:03:36.360
<v Speaker 7>there's more, do you think we could do one more

1447
01:03:36.360 --> 01:03:37.280
<v Speaker 7>back and forth two minutes?

1448
01:03:37.280 --> 01:03:39.199
<v Speaker 8>Teaches, I don't care what both parties I No, I

1449
01:03:39.239 --> 01:03:41.000
<v Speaker 8>think that's it's good to edit here.

1450
01:03:41.039 --> 01:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to go more.

1451
01:03:42.400 --> 01:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't want to go anymore. Right, he knows I'm

1452
01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:48.239
<v Speaker 1>going to the same thing. No, I have a three

1453
01:03:48.280 --> 01:03:51.159
<v Speaker 1>seventy eighth, says the book is not three seventy eight,

1454
01:03:51.239 --> 01:03:53.679
<v Speaker 1>says the book is. So he doesn't want anymore because

1455
01:03:53.679 --> 01:03:54.119
<v Speaker 1>he knows.

1456
01:03:54.000 --> 01:03:54.599
<v Speaker 3>He got bodied.

1457
01:03:55.039 --> 01:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>We already had a debate that now you're losing christ

1458
01:03:57.480 --> 01:03:58.159
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate it.

1459
01:03:58.159 --> 01:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>If we're bringing up more of your problems. I'm not crying.

1460
01:04:02.199 --> 01:04:05.239
<v Speaker 1>You're the one snickering with that gig because you got cooked.

1461
01:04:05.719 --> 01:04:06.519
<v Speaker 1>It's all rhetoric.

1462
01:04:08.480 --> 01:04:10.519
<v Speaker 7>Jay. It was nice to meet you, and I appreciate

1463
01:04:10.559 --> 01:04:12.199
<v Speaker 7>you coming on here. This is much more civil than

1464
01:04:12.199 --> 01:04:14.719
<v Speaker 7>the earlier data. I hope to do this again. I

1465
01:04:14.719 --> 01:04:18.280
<v Speaker 7>think this was anytime.

1466
01:04:22.119 --> 01:04:23.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what a joke, dude.

1467
01:04:23.239 --> 01:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>That guy was pitiful dude, And yeah, I I butted

1468
01:04:27.519 --> 01:04:29.559
<v Speaker 1>him many times, because this whole thing was resting on

1469
01:04:29.760 --> 01:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>miss misinterpreting and misunderstanding and ignoring. And uh, I hope

1470
01:04:33.880 --> 01:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>everybody heard him completely collapse on the attributes and no

1471
01:04:39.280 --> 01:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>idea what monarchical trinitarianism is and what the position is.

1472
01:04:43.719 --> 01:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>The passages that we're talking about in the Koran. Do

1473
01:04:46.119 --> 01:04:49.239
<v Speaker 1>not say that they're only talking about the Quran. This

1474
01:04:49.440 --> 01:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>is talking about the text of the Jews and the Christians.

1475
01:04:52.559 --> 01:04:54.559
<v Speaker 1>And it's here saying that do not say the book

1476
01:04:54.599 --> 01:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is corrupt. That is not corrupt. And on that last

1477
01:04:57.480 --> 01:04:59.679
<v Speaker 1>passage he said, this is talking about all those judgments,

1478
01:04:59.760 --> 01:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>not a book.

1479
01:05:02.079 --> 01:05:02.880
<v Speaker 3>It set a book.

1480
01:05:06.360 --> 01:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Allah has revealed to you, the Torah and the Gospel

1481
01:05:09.039 --> 01:05:16.719
<v Speaker 1>three three. Allaw's words cannot be corrupted anyway. I hope

1482
01:05:16.719 --> 01:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>everybody clips the heck of the heck out of that

1483
01:05:19.119 --> 01:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and shows the parts where he especially, I felt like

1484
01:05:24.039 --> 01:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>on the attributes, like he was completely demolished. So everybody

1485
01:05:28.599 --> 01:05:31.119
<v Speaker 1>should clip that. I hope that goes viral. We got

1486
01:05:31.119 --> 01:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>some super chats here, zalmonics five. I'm a lawyer and

1487
01:05:36.360 --> 01:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a Christian. I've been practicing. You're the best debater I've

1488
01:05:38.880 --> 01:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. This is even in litigation, thank you. I mean,

1489
01:05:41.039 --> 01:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think debate and you know law they overlap quite

1490
01:05:45.960 --> 01:05:47.559
<v Speaker 1>a bit. In fact, we were watching a movie last

1491
01:05:47.599 --> 01:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>night that had a lot of courtroom stuff going on,

1492
01:05:49.559 --> 01:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and Jamie was asking me we were talking about debate

1493
01:05:52.800 --> 01:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>related issues. Yeah, it is interesting. You could probably find

1494
01:05:58.360 --> 01:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of parallels with the way that I go

1495
01:06:02.119 --> 01:06:05.679
<v Speaker 1>about and do debate in the way that lawyers do stuff.

1496
01:06:07.639 --> 01:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually know a lot about, you know, law

1497
01:06:09.639 --> 01:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and litigation and all that. But again, I do imagine

1498
01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of overlap there. But you know,

1499
01:06:14.760 --> 01:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>really it's I guess the comparison would be like a

1500
01:06:22.400 --> 01:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>lawyer wants to probably trip somebody up in their statements,

1501
01:06:27.719 --> 01:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm kind of doing the same thing, except that

1502
01:06:31.800 --> 01:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm also looking for not just will they trip up,

1503
01:06:34.639 --> 01:06:37.079
<v Speaker 1>but are they violating the laws of logic? Right? So

1504
01:06:37.159 --> 01:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a big part of it. You notice that guy

1505
01:06:40.400 --> 01:06:43.679
<v Speaker 1>never he didn't even understand any of the fallacies, what

1506
01:06:43.719 --> 01:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the fallacies are, why it's even wrong to make fallacies.

1507
01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the death knell of anybody in a debate.

1508
01:06:49.639 --> 01:06:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Fallacies might not be that relevant in a litigation setting

1509
01:06:53.599 --> 01:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>or in a courtroom, although they might be to some degree,

1510
01:06:56.880 --> 01:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's an interesting question. I imagine they have some

1511
01:07:05.519 --> 01:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>overlap with a courtroom sitting. Jeremiah James five dollars. Muslim

1512
01:07:09.480 --> 01:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>lantern hasn't had any oil since Mohammed was with Aisha Oh.

1513
01:07:13.960 --> 01:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Wilson one hundred dollars. Thank you so much, Rachel,

1514
01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. That's a big fat superche You don't have

1515
01:07:17.840 --> 01:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to give me that, but that's really sweet of you

1516
01:07:19.880 --> 01:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. And I didn't want. I hope Andrew didn't

1517
01:07:23.559 --> 01:07:29.119
<v Speaker 1>think that I was like streaming over his debate. I

1518
01:07:29.199 --> 01:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>actually forgot that he was doing that debate tonight. I

1519
01:07:31.960 --> 01:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that was like several days in the future. So anyway,

1520
01:07:35.840 --> 01:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean to step over you know you guys

1521
01:07:37.920 --> 01:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of streaming time. But thank you for that,

1522
01:07:40.440 --> 01:07:42.679
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like it was kind of a it

1523
01:07:42.719 --> 01:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't go as planned there. Well, Am annual five dollars.

1524
01:07:44.920 --> 01:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for the extra time with patience. Yeah, I

1525
01:07:47.320 --> 01:07:49.559
<v Speaker 1>mean again, I've already been debating for four hours straight.

1526
01:07:49.719 --> 01:07:52.639
<v Speaker 1>So how long was this one? I don't even know,

1527
01:07:53.079 --> 01:08:01.159
<v Speaker 1>another hour and a half. It looks like, yeah, what

1528
01:08:01.199 --> 01:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>did you guys think about this? How do you guys

1529
01:08:04.320 --> 01:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>think Muslim lantern did. I really feel like he was

1530
01:08:08.119 --> 01:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>collapsing on the attributes part, because everything he said about

1531
01:08:11.800 --> 01:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the attributes was like, what do you mean that's embarrassing? Jay?

1532
01:08:19.640 --> 01:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Church fathers under the bus? What are you talking about?

1533
01:08:22.479 --> 01:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I did throw the church fathers on the bus. What

1534
01:08:24.039 --> 01:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I said was he was oversimplifying it by saying, do

1535
01:08:28.640 --> 01:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the church fathers teach the Trinity? And do they teach

1536
01:08:32.119 --> 01:08:36.479
<v Speaker 1>it without debate? And I said, no, they teach that

1537
01:08:36.560 --> 01:08:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the persons are distinct and that there's the divinity of Christ,

1538
01:08:39.840 --> 01:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>but they do debate things. And so that's why I

1539
01:08:42.920 --> 01:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't agree to his oversimplified questions. So Muslims, you notice

1540
01:08:48.800 --> 01:08:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Daniel did the exact same thing, didn't he. Daniel did

1541
01:08:51.399 --> 01:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing. Where Daniel said, I want the

1542
01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>simple answer. Look how simple Islam is? You guys have complex,

1543
01:08:57.560 --> 01:09:02.039
<v Speaker 1>difficult doctrines. But the reality is Muslim also have complex doctrines.

1544
01:09:02.199 --> 01:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And so he lied when he said, what is this akida?

1545
01:09:04.600 --> 01:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

1546
01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:07.560
<v Speaker 3>He knows what akida is. It's the different schools.

1547
01:09:08.319 --> 01:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>He knows that there's different traditions and that they've killed

1548
01:09:10.560 --> 01:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>each other over these things. And that's why he tried

1549
01:09:13.880 --> 01:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>to deflect away from it, tell me the four principles

1550
01:09:16.119 --> 01:09:19.119
<v Speaker 1>of the multa kalim like as that that has anything

1551
01:09:19.159 --> 01:09:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to do with the argument I'm making about his position.

1552
01:09:21.920 --> 01:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So that was all deflections.

1553
01:09:25.279 --> 01:09:25.640
<v Speaker 3>Bryce.

1554
01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:28.039
<v Speaker 1>But you notice what he did the same things as

1555
01:09:28.199 --> 01:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Daniel by arguing that you set something up as an

1556
01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>overly simple It's called a complex fallacy of oversimplication. That's

1557
01:09:42.760 --> 01:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>what it's called. Right, So the Trinity is a complex doctrine,

1558
01:09:46.319 --> 01:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and so you say something like, I give an example

1559
01:09:48.720 --> 01:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of this, where's the verse that proves the doctrine of

1560
01:09:51.680 --> 01:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity. There isn't one. You see, the Trinity can't

1561
01:09:54.840 --> 01:09:59.399
<v Speaker 1>be proven from scripture. Well, the argument assumes that the

1562
01:09:59.439 --> 01:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>Trinity is a doctrine that would only come from a verse.

1563
01:10:03.279 --> 01:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's a fallacy, right. Over simplification fallacy is the

1564
01:10:21.520 --> 01:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>fallacy of the single cause. Over simplifies a complex issue

1565
01:10:24.479 --> 01:10:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to imply that a single cause produces the same effect.

1566
01:10:27.359 --> 01:10:29.199
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be causalor it can also be

1567
01:10:29.600 --> 01:10:33.279
<v Speaker 1>a false either or right. Either the Church fathers taught

1568
01:10:32.960 --> 01:10:38.159
<v Speaker 1>the Trinity or they didn't. Well, the Church fathers did

1569
01:10:38.199 --> 01:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>teach the doctrine of trinity, and there was a lot

1570
01:10:39.920 --> 01:10:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of debate, but he was trying to make it like

1571
01:10:42.520 --> 01:10:46.119
<v Speaker 1>if there's debate, they didn't teach it and it wasn't clear. Remember,

1572
01:10:46.199 --> 01:10:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Daniel made this point, he said there was debate, and

1573
01:10:49.439 --> 01:10:51.359
<v Speaker 1>if there's debate over it, it's not true. And then

1574
01:10:51.439 --> 01:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Daniel turn around said, Muslims have debated this. Oh but

1575
01:10:54.840 --> 01:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, Daniel, you said that debate means that

1576
01:10:57.359 --> 01:10:59.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not true if people are debating it. So you

1577
01:10:59.399 --> 01:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>see how silly these people are. John Z one hundred dollars,

1578
01:11:02.680 --> 01:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, you destroyed that clown. God blurss,

1579
01:11:04.640 --> 01:11:08.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you God bless you as well much appreciating those

1580
01:11:08.399 --> 01:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>fat super chats cards one dollar To confirm the Quran,

1581
01:11:14.479 --> 01:11:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you go to the Koran. Yes, he said that, didn't he?

1582
01:11:17.279 --> 01:11:19.359
<v Speaker 1>He said, No one here is asking about proof of

1583
01:11:19.359 --> 01:11:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the Kuran. I'm asking about proof of the Koran. What

1584
01:11:21.159 --> 01:11:23.279
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about? What do you mean nobody's asking

1585
01:11:23.279 --> 01:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>That's the very thing I asked you more than once. Yeah,

1586
01:11:26.119 --> 01:11:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you go through the Koran to prove the Koran exactly exactly,

1587
01:11:29.920 --> 01:11:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the logic is haram. Exactly, logic is haram. Jake Bernitt's

1588
01:11:35.199 --> 01:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty three dollars I recently had a debate with a Muslim.

1589
01:11:38.079 --> 01:11:40.479
<v Speaker 1>He made a similar point, saying that the son is

1590
01:11:40.520 --> 01:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>subordinate to the father, so they're not equal. So something

1591
01:11:42.960 --> 01:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>can be subordinate and equal and distinct in different ways.

1592
01:11:46.119 --> 01:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And every analogy that I gave was to that effect.

1593
01:11:49.399 --> 01:11:52.119
<v Speaker 1>A father and a son are distinct. The son is

1594
01:11:52.439 --> 01:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>subordinate to the father, but they have equal nature. The

1595
01:11:57.439 --> 01:12:00.279
<v Speaker 1>king can invest the prince with all the power of

1596
01:12:00.319 --> 01:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the king. They're distinct persons, but the king can grant

1597
01:12:05.680 --> 01:12:10.279
<v Speaker 1>to the prince all the powers of the king. So

1598
01:12:10.319 --> 01:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>they have the same nature, human nature, and all the

1599
01:12:13.199 --> 01:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>same powers. Remember he said there is no verse word.

1600
01:12:16.479 --> 01:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Does Jesus say the Father have given all the power

1601
01:12:18.680 --> 01:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of till son? Yeah, there is, I read it John sixteen.

1602
01:12:23.359 --> 01:12:27.760
<v Speaker 11>And then he's like, this doesn't say trinity, doesn't say hypostasis. Yeah,

1603
01:12:27.800 --> 01:12:33.399
<v Speaker 11>hypostasis is using other passages. Dude, please go into more

1604
01:12:33.399 --> 01:12:35.439
<v Speaker 11>depth about the training. So the people that are interested

1605
01:12:35.439 --> 01:12:39.159
<v Speaker 11>in this, all of the monarchical trinitarian talks of doctor

1606
01:12:39.159 --> 01:12:53.960
<v Speaker 11>Bo Branson cover this in great detail. So if you

1607
01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:57.359
<v Speaker 11>go to Bo Branson dot com and you come over

1608
01:12:57.399 --> 01:13:01.039
<v Speaker 11>here to meet I think it's media. Yeah, so Bobranson

1609
01:13:01.079 --> 01:13:05.199
<v Speaker 11>dot com media appearances, and on this page is a

1610
01:13:05.319 --> 01:13:19.680
<v Speaker 11>five part lecture series and then other interviews on monarchical trinitarianism.

1611
01:13:19.720 --> 01:13:21.840
<v Speaker 11>You know, the funny thing is that the very first

1612
01:13:21.880 --> 01:13:26.359
<v Speaker 11>thing that I said answers half of his objections. I

1613
01:13:26.640 --> 01:13:31.600
<v Speaker 11>in the first five minutes mentioned monarchical trinitarianism, and then

1614
01:13:31.640 --> 01:13:34.920
<v Speaker 11>he spent half of the dam ofn debate arguing against

1615
01:13:35.840 --> 01:13:36.399
<v Speaker 11>texts that.

1616
01:13:36.359 --> 01:13:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Proved monarchical trinitarianism. Have you ever brought up First John

1617
01:13:41.159 --> 01:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>five to seven to a Muslim? I don't know. Let's see,

1618
01:13:47.079 --> 01:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't usually because they don't care. On most of

1619
01:13:49.439 --> 01:13:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the time, they don't care about the text. Oh that's

1620
01:13:52.119 --> 01:13:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the Joan comma. I mean they're going to just say, well,

1621
01:13:55.439 --> 01:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not in all the old manuscripts. But I mean,

1622
01:13:58.720 --> 01:14:01.119
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of passages to teacher. We don't it's not

1623
01:14:01.119 --> 01:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like we have to have the y comma. So it

1624
01:14:06.640 --> 01:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>looks like a lot of people are saying they think

1625
01:14:08.640 --> 01:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that he's one of the worst debaters. He was definitely

1626
01:14:13.439 --> 01:14:19.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty sneaky, slippery. Who's is he one of the worst?

1627
01:14:20.159 --> 01:14:20.479
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

1628
01:14:20.479 --> 01:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's my that's my only experience of that dude.

1629
01:14:22.640 --> 01:14:26.079
<v Speaker 1>I've I've never heard or seen anything about him, so

1630
01:14:26.159 --> 01:14:31.239
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of sneaky hints sneak. Oh but alulah three

1631
01:14:31.279 --> 01:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars crisis King. Yeah, absolutely, Yeah, I know, the the

1632
01:14:38.880 --> 01:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>yawning comma is uh, I don't I mean we call

1633
01:14:42.600 --> 01:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we covered that in the James Snap interview. Sneak o

1634
01:14:47.760 --> 01:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>mods will block Christians in the chat? Well, yeah, I mean, look,

1635
01:14:52.560 --> 01:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Islam is not a position that relies on logic. It's

1636
01:14:56.840 --> 01:15:02.079
<v Speaker 1>a position that relies on trickery, tomfoolery and sneakery. So

1637
01:15:02.119 --> 01:15:12.039
<v Speaker 1>what do you expect so voting the poll? There's a poll,

1638
01:15:12.279 --> 01:15:14.399
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean he just basically went to all

1639
01:15:14.399 --> 01:15:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the classic dollars script stuff. What's funny about all of that?

1640
01:15:17.319 --> 01:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that really, all the dollars script stuff and

1641
01:15:19.840 --> 01:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>all of what they do, it's really just meant to

1642
01:15:22.119 --> 01:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like try to capture the low tier, lowest common denominator audience,

1643
01:15:28.199 --> 01:15:31.199
<v Speaker 1>to bring them in who are aren't interested in any

1644
01:15:31.319 --> 01:15:35.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of like distinctions or any kind of nuance. And

1645
01:15:35.640 --> 01:15:38.239
<v Speaker 1>it's just intended really to be a way to capture

1646
01:15:38.359 --> 01:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>low tier stuff. And then when they deal with people

1647
01:15:41.760 --> 01:15:54.079
<v Speaker 1>who aren't low tier, it becomes very obvious. I think, oh,

1648
01:15:54.079 --> 01:15:59.479
<v Speaker 1>that's the poll from their stream. Oh they have a stream. Well,

1649
01:15:59.520 --> 01:16:06.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure all Muslims are in their stream. So so

1650
01:16:06.199 --> 01:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>here let's see here you Yeah, definitely if you want to, Yeah,

1651
01:16:09.960 --> 01:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely go debate. I mean, oops, here we go, I

1652
01:16:13.800 --> 01:16:22.119
<v Speaker 1>mean vote, excuse me, not debate? Who won? I think

1653
01:16:22.159 --> 01:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I won, So I'm gonna say I won, But I

1654
01:16:26.920 --> 01:16:28.479
<v Speaker 1>should do my own poll because I'm sure there's a

1655
01:16:28.479 --> 01:16:32.239
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Muslims silent one dollar. It's crazy how Lantern

1656
01:16:32.399 --> 01:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was using fallacies when he twists your words and just lies,

1657
01:16:38.920 --> 01:16:41.039
<v Speaker 1>and the Muslims eat it up. They don't actually read

1658
01:16:41.079 --> 01:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>their sources. Correct toy five dollars. I recently listened to

1659
01:16:49.600 --> 01:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>all the Bo Branson lectures on that page because you

1660
01:16:51.760 --> 01:16:54.439
<v Speaker 1>recommended it. It blew my mind. It's very interesting. Yeah, exactly.

1661
01:16:55.439 --> 01:17:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Branson's monarchical trinitarian talks are essential, So definitely head

1662
01:17:07.359 --> 01:17:16.279
<v Speaker 1>on over here and watch these. But that's okay. I

1663
01:17:16.319 --> 01:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>mean the people that want to be idiots and they

1664
01:17:17.920 --> 01:17:19.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be you know, low tier, and they want

1665
01:17:19.640 --> 01:17:22.039
<v Speaker 1>to believe stupid stuff. You're you're never going to change

1666
01:17:22.399 --> 01:17:30.319
<v Speaker 1>people that are not open to what's true. Yeah, I'll

1667
01:17:30.319 --> 01:17:33.279
<v Speaker 1>be sure, and vote so that these people don't just

1668
01:17:33.359 --> 01:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>promote their own Muslim polls, which is I'm sure what

1669
01:17:36.239 --> 01:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna do, but straw pole here, and keep in mind,

1670
01:17:44.720 --> 01:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea what's going on. I didn't even

1671
01:17:46.800 --> 01:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know what topic until I went in

1672
01:17:48.560 --> 01:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the room. I've already been debating for four hours. So

1673
01:17:53.680 --> 01:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>there we go, Tamata, Oh no, excuse me, Italian King.

1674
01:17:58.880 --> 01:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Ten dollars, Good job, Jay, crisis King, love and forgiveness

1675
01:18:02.800 --> 01:18:07.319
<v Speaker 1>they're lacking nowadays. Yeah, I would agree with that, Hunter

1676
01:18:07.399 --> 01:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Tyler three fifty five one dollars. Muslims reject Paul. Paul

1677
01:18:10.119 --> 01:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is a transgressior in Galatians won it absolutely recxs Islam

1678
01:18:13.960 --> 01:18:18.159
<v Speaker 1>and shows Mohammed as a false prophet. Yeah, doctor feaded again.

1679
01:18:18.239 --> 01:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>And Eys and I have made this point many times

1680
01:18:20.199 --> 01:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that the finality of revelation, which is taught very clearly

1681
01:18:26.840 --> 01:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>even in the Old Testament, that when the Messiah comes

1682
01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the Messianic era, well there was an end of divine revelation. Okay,

1683
01:18:32.920 --> 01:18:35.479
<v Speaker 1>there's no new revelations after the death of the apostles.

1684
01:18:35.520 --> 01:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>That's it. So that right there cuts off all of

1685
01:18:38.560 --> 01:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the future cults Mormons, Mohammedan's it doesn't matter, eric Ze

1686
01:18:43.800 --> 01:18:46.439
<v Speaker 1>three dollars three thirty seven. You're very patient arguing with

1687
01:18:46.479 --> 01:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>a wall like that. Well, they always play this game

1688
01:18:48.399 --> 01:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>where they're like, oh, we want to have a conversation,

1689
01:18:49.880 --> 01:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to have a conversation, and then they immediately

1690
01:18:51.600 --> 01:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>start with all the tricks, because theirs is a system

1691
01:18:55.560 --> 01:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and a position that has to rely on a bunch

1692
01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of tricks. So we don't really on tricks over here.

1693
01:19:01.039 --> 01:19:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I will interrupt people, and I'll call people out when

1694
01:19:03.319 --> 01:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>they start lying and saying something I didn't say. Jake

1695
01:19:06.000 --> 01:19:08.079
<v Speaker 1>Burnett's one dollar. What do you think the Muslims insist

1696
01:19:08.199 --> 01:19:10.880
<v Speaker 1>on everything being simple because they're appealing to simple people.

1697
01:19:11.279 --> 01:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>The whole position is about making it simple as a

1698
01:19:14.920 --> 01:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>sales pitch for simple minded people. So the only people

1699
01:19:18.760 --> 01:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>who fall for this are people who are unfortunately not

1700
01:19:21.760 --> 01:19:23.439
<v Speaker 1>very sophisticated. Now, I don't want to make it only

1701
01:19:23.479 --> 01:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>an intellectual thing, because not only intellectual, right, there's also

1702
01:19:26.720 --> 01:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a spiritual delusion component of this too. But spiritual delusion

1703
01:19:29.920 --> 01:19:33.079
<v Speaker 1>effects our intellect, you see, it can darken the intellect

1704
01:19:33.119 --> 01:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>so that we don't have discernment. They always say that

1705
01:19:37.479 --> 01:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>if you can explain the trinity to be simple, then

1706
01:19:39.439 --> 01:19:41.319
<v Speaker 1>it's proven, and if not, it's relacious. Yeah, this is

1707
01:19:41.800 --> 01:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an oversimplification fallacy. It's also an arbitrary expectation, like I

1708
01:19:49.840 --> 01:19:53.239
<v Speaker 1>could make the same point, make Allah and his relationship

1709
01:19:53.319 --> 01:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to his attribute simple, or else I won't believe it.

1710
01:19:56.479 --> 01:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You see how silly that is? Well, this that's funny.

1711
01:20:03.640 --> 01:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>If i'm it's funny. Even if I'm two percent I

1712
01:20:05.760 --> 01:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>had on their pole, this is their Muslim pole, and

1713
01:20:09.239 --> 01:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm two percent ahead. That's funny. So you can go debate,

1714
01:20:11.760 --> 01:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Go bait u, debate, go vote.

1715
01:20:14.079 --> 01:20:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Right there.

1716
01:20:15.159 --> 01:20:17.239
<v Speaker 1>My mind is beginning to turn the mush because we're

1717
01:20:17.319 --> 01:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>like six hours into debate now. But I do appreciate

1718
01:20:23.640 --> 01:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Sneako at least finally sort of coming around and and

1719
01:20:27.239 --> 01:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>addressing this because people have been vote uh calling out

1720
01:20:34.960 --> 01:20:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sneak oh and asking him to come debate for a

1721
01:20:42.720 --> 01:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>long time. That's funny.

1722
01:20:46.680 --> 01:20:49.399
<v Speaker 3>So they're gonna tell you quick, go vote, quick vote

1723
01:20:49.520 --> 01:20:50.680
<v Speaker 3>quick one one one.

1724
01:21:00.439 --> 01:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I really, I really think they think that if

1725
01:21:03.479 --> 01:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's simple, it's got to be true. I mean, did

1726
01:21:07.680 --> 01:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you notice too that he lied, like he said, we

1727
01:21:10.479 --> 01:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know what is Akida? What is that he like,

1728
01:21:12.439 --> 01:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't know what akda is. And by the way,

1729
01:21:15.760 --> 01:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Muslims aren't allowed to ignore.

1730
01:21:19.880 --> 01:21:22.399
<v Speaker 3>A school. You have to be in some school.

1731
01:21:23.319 --> 01:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>But he was being disingenuous, right and acting like, I

1732
01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know what this word is? What are these what's

1733
01:21:29.880 --> 01:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>what are the schools? And acting like they don't disagree

1734
01:21:33.680 --> 01:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>amongst themselves. Come on, I hope everybody saw how ridiculous

1735
01:21:37.880 --> 01:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that was. Right, Akda creed? Which creed?

1736
01:21:45.079 --> 01:21:47.119
<v Speaker 3>Which school of Islamic theology? Are you a part of?

1737
01:21:47.199 --> 01:21:47.920
<v Speaker 3>What is akida?

1738
01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what is this world? I don't know

1739
01:21:49.880 --> 01:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>his word? What is this work made up?

1740
01:21:51.840 --> 01:21:52.039
<v Speaker 2>Are you?

1741
01:21:52.279 --> 01:21:55.039
<v Speaker 3>He's making up words? Doesn't know what it mean?

1742
01:21:57.760 --> 01:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>And what have we done but call out people like

1743
01:22:00.319 --> 01:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Jake and the others that change their akida depending upon

1744
01:22:03.000 --> 01:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the debate that they're in, which you're not allowed to do,

1745
01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but you are allowed to do it in a religion

1746
01:22:09.039 --> 01:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's deceptive and allows you to lie and trick and

1747
01:22:11.800 --> 01:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>do all this, do this trickery. So I guess they

1748
01:22:14.239 --> 01:22:16.199
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to do it even though technically they're not

1749
01:22:16.239 --> 01:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do it.

1750
01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:20.279
<v Speaker 3>What is this adida? I don't know what adidas?

1751
01:22:20.319 --> 01:22:21.680
<v Speaker 7>Are these shoes?

1752
01:22:21.800 --> 01:22:24.680
<v Speaker 3>What is the shoes. Look at a black shirt like

1753
01:22:24.840 --> 01:22:27.359
<v Speaker 3>a lah has parts, but he doesn't have parts. It's

1754
01:22:27.359 --> 01:22:29.600
<v Speaker 3>an analogy to help you with my shirt, but it's

1755
01:22:29.640 --> 01:22:31.439
<v Speaker 3>done like a lot. You see how silly this was.

1756
01:22:32.319 --> 01:22:33.159
<v Speaker 4>This was so bad.

1757
01:22:34.399 --> 01:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But even their own poles, they're having a hard time.

1758
01:22:39.079 --> 01:22:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Even even their own poles. Look at that ten.

1759
01:22:42.840 --> 01:22:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Percent above in their own pole. Oh man, Muslim take loss,

1760
01:22:51.760 --> 01:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Muslim take a big l Okay, I'm about totally exhausted. No,

1761
01:23:00.600 --> 01:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so thank you guys for all of this. I'm definitely

1762
01:23:04.840 --> 01:23:07.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna clip this one up because this one was funny.

1763
01:23:07.840 --> 01:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>All you guys, definitely clip clip clip because the clips

1764
01:23:11.560 --> 01:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>go out crazier and further than the actual long live shoots.

1765
01:23:14.359 --> 01:23:15.479
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people are not going to watch this

1766
01:23:15.600 --> 01:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>six six hour live stream, but zillion people watch these clips.

1767
01:23:19.960 --> 01:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Sam's channels of clips blew up bigger than his main

1768
01:23:24.119 --> 01:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Shammounian channel. So guys, you guys, clip clip, clip, clip away,

1769
01:23:30.239 --> 01:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>especially clip him making all those dumb mistakes and saying

1770
01:23:34.840 --> 01:23:40.920
<v Speaker 1>all that stupid stuff. Clip it to oblivion, Bros. Clip channels,

1771
01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>please clip gubb clip it all those other clippers clipper ships,

1772
01:23:48.600 --> 01:23:54.319
<v Speaker 1>clip it. Texas guy. One great performance appreciate you. Hey,

1773
01:23:54.359 --> 01:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. You guys are being so generous.

1774
01:23:57.119 --> 01:24:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess I guess it was worth it to come

1775
01:24:00.359 --> 01:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>to work tonight to debate for six freakin' hours and

1776
01:24:06.239 --> 01:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>get a nice paycheck. Thank you guys so much, appreciate it.

1777
01:24:10.199 --> 01:24:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Much love to you guys. God bless everybody. Uh again,

1778
01:24:14.720 --> 01:24:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Please guys, start your own clip channels to our bro

1779
01:24:19.800 --> 01:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>clip channels, jub all the other ones, Kyle guys, clip

1780
01:24:25.760 --> 01:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it and be sure and head over to chalk dot com.

1781
01:24:32.039 --> 01:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Use promo code J forty to get forty percent off

1782
01:24:35.399 --> 01:24:38.439
<v Speaker 1>or J forty four life to get forty four percent

1783
01:24:38.520 --> 01:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>off that amazing chalk dot com. If you want to

1784
01:24:41.159 --> 01:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>get my books, you can head over to Jasonnoulsons dot

1785
01:24:43.479 --> 01:24:47.079
<v Speaker 1>com in the shop and get all of my books

1786
01:24:47.119 --> 01:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>signed copies. You can also subscribe to my website or

1787
01:24:49.680 --> 01:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to me on Rockfinn and uh everybody, have a

1788
01:24:54.199 --> 01:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>good night.
