WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomy podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:25.199
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky.

7
00:00:26.920 --> 00:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So for our look into the sources today, we're

8
00:00:29.600 --> 00:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>zooming out, way out, way out, Yeah, past the edge

9
00:00:32.960 --> 00:00:34.679
<v Speaker 2>of our own galaxy, the Milky Way.

10
00:00:34.640 --> 00:00:37.439
<v Speaker 3>And we're focusing on our two closest and probably most

11
00:00:37.439 --> 00:00:38.880
<v Speaker 3>famous galactic neighbors.

12
00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:41.039
<v Speaker 2>Right if you're in the southern hemisphere, you just can't

13
00:00:41.039 --> 00:00:43.759
<v Speaker 2>miss them, the large and small Magellantic Cloud.

14
00:00:43.799 --> 00:00:46.039
<v Speaker 3>There's so much more than just these beautiful patches of

15
00:00:46.119 --> 00:00:48.359
<v Speaker 3>light in the sky though. I mean, for centuries they

16
00:00:48.359 --> 00:00:50.880
<v Speaker 3>were guides for sailors and inspiration.

17
00:00:50.560 --> 00:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>For poets, sure, but for astronomers they represent something else entirely.

18
00:00:54.799 --> 00:00:59.799
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely, for astronomers, these irregular dwarf galaxies are home

19
00:00:59.840 --> 00:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>to some of the most profound and honestly most frustrating

20
00:01:03.039 --> 00:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>mysteries in all of galaxy evolution.

21
00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:07.959
<v Speaker 2>And that's why we're looking at this today because this

22
00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:11.079
<v Speaker 2>isn't just about another observation. We're talking about it massive

23
00:01:11.359 --> 00:01:12.799
<v Speaker 2>dedicated research.

24
00:01:12.439 --> 00:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Program monumental is the word, a five year program focused

25
00:01:16.319 --> 00:01:18.040
<v Speaker 3>entirely on these two galaxies.

26
00:01:18.280 --> 00:01:21.200
<v Speaker 2>The whole mission here is to take what look like

27
00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>these these abstract clouds of stars and gas and turn

28
00:01:25.560 --> 00:01:28.400
<v Speaker 2>them into a detailed, meticulous cosmic history.

29
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:31.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's exactly what we're going to unpack. We are

30
00:01:31.519 --> 00:01:35.239
<v Speaker 3>looking at the sources that detail this new astronomical campaign,

31
00:01:35.640 --> 00:01:39.200
<v Speaker 3>try to figure out what makes these two galaxies the

32
00:01:39.359 --> 00:01:40.879
<v Speaker 3>ultimate cosmic.

33
00:01:40.519 --> 00:01:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Lab, and what are the core scientific puzzles that this

34
00:01:44.280 --> 00:01:46.680
<v Speaker 2>huge data collection is really designed to solve.

35
00:01:46.799 --> 00:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, We want to give you the shortcut to understanding

36
00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:53.640
<v Speaker 3>the secrets that are locked away inside the Magellanic clouds.

37
00:01:54.200 --> 00:01:57.480
<v Speaker 2>So the starting point, the ultimate takeaway, really begins with

38
00:01:57.840 --> 00:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>just geography, or I guess cosmic geography. Proximity.

39
00:02:03.000 --> 00:02:06.519
<v Speaker 3>Proximity is everything in galactic terms. They are practically on

40
00:02:06.560 --> 00:02:07.159
<v Speaker 3>our doorstep.

41
00:02:07.319 --> 00:02:08.479
<v Speaker 2>How close are we talking.

42
00:02:08.439 --> 00:02:10.960
<v Speaker 3>The LMC, the large one is about one hundred and

43
00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:13.639
<v Speaker 3>sixty three thousand light years away. The SMC is a

44
00:02:13.639 --> 00:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit further, around two hundred and six thousand.

45
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>And just to give you some perspective on that the

46
00:02:17.879 --> 00:02:20.800
<v Speaker 2>next big galaxy, Andromeda is what over two and a

47
00:02:20.800 --> 00:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>half million light.

48
00:02:21.479 --> 00:02:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Years away, right, So this sheer closeness is what makes

49
00:02:24.639 --> 00:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>them so scientifically valuable.

50
00:02:26.520 --> 00:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Invaluable because they give us a perspective we just can't

51
00:02:29.319 --> 00:02:31.039
<v Speaker 2>get from inside our own galaxy.

52
00:02:31.240 --> 00:02:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Precisely, we can resolve individual stars with incredible clarity. Because

53
00:02:35.759 --> 00:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>they're so close, we can map out their entire structure,

54
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:42.759
<v Speaker 3>their stellar populations, the internal dynamics without.

55
00:02:42.520 --> 00:02:44.159
<v Speaker 2>All the clutter of the Milky Way getting in.

56
00:02:44.080 --> 00:02:47.919
<v Speaker 3>The way exactly. The sources call them excellent natural laboratories

57
00:02:48.039 --> 00:02:51.960
<v Speaker 3>for studying things like galaxy evolution and star formation, and

58
00:02:52.000 --> 00:02:54.759
<v Speaker 3>those are processes that are either completely hidden by dust

59
00:02:54.800 --> 00:02:58.360
<v Speaker 3>in our own galaxy or just impossible to see coherently

60
00:02:58.719 --> 00:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>from where we sit inside the galactic disc.

61
00:03:01.039 --> 00:03:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we have the perfect subjects. Now, we need

62
00:03:03.479 --> 00:03:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the team and the tools, and this is a huge

63
00:03:06.080 --> 00:03:09.800
<v Speaker 2>international project, but there's one institution really spear hitting it.

64
00:03:09.960 --> 00:03:12.159
<v Speaker 3>That's right. This whole push is being led by a

65
00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:15.800
<v Speaker 3>new research group at the Libniz Institute for Astrophysics, Potsdam,

66
00:03:15.879 --> 00:03:17.159
<v Speaker 3>the AIP, and.

67
00:03:17.080 --> 00:03:20.120
<v Speaker 2>A key person here is doctor Laura Colinane, yes.

68
00:03:19.960 --> 00:03:22.520
<v Speaker 3>A postdoc at AIP, and her focus is really on

69
00:03:22.520 --> 00:03:25.719
<v Speaker 3>the nitty gritty details, the chemistry the motion of individual

70
00:03:25.759 --> 00:03:27.639
<v Speaker 3>stars within that bigger galactic picture.

71
00:03:27.680 --> 00:03:31.000
<v Speaker 2>And the project itself has this wonderfully grand name one

72
00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>thousand and one Magellanic.

73
00:03:32.680 --> 00:03:35.599
<v Speaker 3>Fields, mercifully shortened to one thousand and one MC.

74
00:03:36.280 --> 00:03:37.840
<v Speaker 2>It does have a nice ring to it.

75
00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:41.039
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like an adventure, and honestly the scale fits.

76
00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>The main goal here for doctor Colinane and her colleagues

77
00:03:45.159 --> 00:03:48.680
<v Speaker 3>is to resolve individual stars. We're not talking about just

78
00:03:48.800 --> 00:03:50.199
<v Speaker 3>blurry smudges of light.

79
00:03:50.520 --> 00:03:53.759
<v Speaker 2>No, this is getting down to the component parts exactly.

80
00:03:53.840 --> 00:03:56.159
<v Speaker 3>The idea is that if you can understand the detailed

81
00:03:56.240 --> 00:04:01.000
<v Speaker 3>chemistry and the movement of say half million single stars,

82
00:04:01.560 --> 00:04:03.280
<v Speaker 3>you can piece together the whole.

83
00:04:03.039 --> 00:04:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Life story, the bigger picture, how these galaxies formed, how

84
00:04:08.240 --> 00:04:11.199
<v Speaker 2>they've interacted with each other, how they've changed over billions

85
00:04:11.240 --> 00:04:11.719
<v Speaker 2>of years.

86
00:04:11.919 --> 00:04:14.879
<v Speaker 3>It's like collecting billions of tiny stellar history books to

87
00:04:14.960 --> 00:04:17.839
<v Speaker 3>write the complete biography of the clouds themselves.

88
00:04:18.000 --> 00:04:21.079
<v Speaker 2>You're turning an abstract cloud into a detailed family tree.

89
00:04:21.120 --> 00:04:21.839
<v Speaker 2>That's the mission.

90
00:04:21.920 --> 00:04:24.759
<v Speaker 3>We're moving from just observing the symptoms of galactic evolution

91
00:04:24.879 --> 00:04:27.160
<v Speaker 3>to actually understanding the mechanics behind it.

92
00:04:27.439 --> 00:04:29.759
<v Speaker 2>So let's get a bit deeper into this idea of

93
00:04:29.839 --> 00:04:33.600
<v Speaker 2>than being a superior laboratory. I mean, why is it

94
00:04:33.639 --> 00:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>so much better than just studying in the Milky Way?

95
00:04:36.040 --> 00:04:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know that analogy we sometimes use, the one.

96
00:04:38.439 --> 00:04:40.360
<v Speaker 2>About being stuck in a foggy valley.

97
00:04:40.439 --> 00:04:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Exactly that one trying to map our own galaxy from

98
00:04:44.160 --> 00:04:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the inside is it's like that you've got dust, You've

99
00:04:47.680 --> 00:04:48.680
<v Speaker 3>got clutter everywhere.

100
00:04:48.759 --> 00:04:51.319
<v Speaker 2>Extinction right, just blocks the view completely.

101
00:04:51.439 --> 00:04:56.120
<v Speaker 3>But with the Magellanic clouds we get this this holistic view.

102
00:04:56.160 --> 00:04:58.120
<v Speaker 3>We see the whole thing top to bottom. We can

103
00:04:58.120 --> 00:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>map their entire stellar populations without that heavy interference.

104
00:05:02.399 --> 00:05:06.399
<v Speaker 2>It's more than just the view, right, Their actual physical characteristics.

105
00:05:05.759 --> 00:05:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Are oh, very different, and that's what makes them such

106
00:05:08.279 --> 00:05:11.439
<v Speaker 3>perfect test beds. It's really about their gas content and

107
00:05:12.040 --> 00:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>you could say their maturity.

108
00:05:13.519 --> 00:05:17.040
<v Speaker 2>And the contrast with the Milky Way is pretty stark.

109
00:05:17.199 --> 00:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, two main things define them. First, they are way

110
00:05:21.040 --> 00:05:22.199
<v Speaker 3>more gas rich than.

111
00:05:22.040 --> 00:05:24.680
<v Speaker 2>We are, meaning a much higher fraction of their mass

112
00:05:24.759 --> 00:05:27.279
<v Speaker 2>is just raw hydrogen and helium.

113
00:05:26.920 --> 00:05:30.319
<v Speaker 3>The pristine fuel for making new stars exactly, so they have.

114
00:05:30.279 --> 00:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>A lot of gas left in the tank waiting to

115
00:05:32.079 --> 00:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>be used.

116
00:05:32.680 --> 00:05:35.519
<v Speaker 3>They do. And second, and this is probably even more

117
00:05:35.560 --> 00:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>critical for testing our big cosmological models, they have a

118
00:05:39.240 --> 00:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>much lower metallicity.

119
00:05:40.800 --> 00:05:44.079
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so when astronomers say metallicity, we're talking about all

120
00:05:44.120 --> 00:05:47.079
<v Speaker 2>the elements heavier than hydrogen and helium. Why is it

121
00:05:47.120 --> 00:05:48.879
<v Speaker 2>so important that they have less of that stuff?

122
00:05:49.360 --> 00:05:52.639
<v Speaker 3>Well, low metallicity means the LMC and SMC have had

123
00:05:52.959 --> 00:05:57.199
<v Speaker 3>less chemical enrichment over their lifetimes. Heavy elements are forged

124
00:05:57.240 --> 00:06:00.240
<v Speaker 3>inside stars and then blasted out into the galaxy see

125
00:06:00.240 --> 00:06:03.000
<v Speaker 3>when those stars die, usually in supernovae.

126
00:06:03.160 --> 00:06:06.360
<v Speaker 2>So lower metallicity means a less mature or maybe a

127
00:06:06.439 --> 00:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>less efficient star making system compared to our own.

128
00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Galaxy precisely, and that's what helps us test our models

129
00:06:12.399 --> 00:06:16.439
<v Speaker 3>of galaxy formation. How So, our big cosmological simulations have

130
00:06:16.560 --> 00:06:20.639
<v Speaker 3>always kind of struggled with dwarf galaxies. A key problem

131
00:06:20.680 --> 00:06:23.439
<v Speaker 3>is figuring out how chemical enrichment that build up of

132
00:06:23.480 --> 00:06:27.519
<v Speaker 3>heavy elements actually happens in these small, low mass systems, because.

133
00:06:27.279 --> 00:06:29.040
<v Speaker 2>They don't have enough gravity to hang onto all the

134
00:06:29.079 --> 00:06:31.360
<v Speaker 2>gas that gets blown out by supernovae exactly.

135
00:06:31.600 --> 00:06:34.480
<v Speaker 3>So, the LMC and SMC being both metal poor and

136
00:06:34.600 --> 00:06:38.040
<v Speaker 3>actively forming stars. They let us see star formation happening

137
00:06:38.040 --> 00:06:41.160
<v Speaker 3>in the exact conditions that our theories predict dominated the

138
00:06:41.199 --> 00:06:42.399
<v Speaker 3>early universe.

139
00:06:42.279 --> 00:06:45.079
<v Speaker 2>So we can watch how stars form when the environment

140
00:06:45.120 --> 00:06:48.720
<v Speaker 2>is still relatively pristine, something we just can't do in

141
00:06:48.759 --> 00:06:51.319
<v Speaker 2>the Milky Way's mature, metal rich disc.

142
00:06:51.519 --> 00:06:54.759
<v Speaker 3>They're like living fossils of early galaxy formation. It's an

143
00:06:54.759 --> 00:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>incredible opportunity.

144
00:06:56.199 --> 00:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>That context is invaluable. And within these metal poor games

145
00:07:00.079 --> 00:07:02.680
<v Speaker 2>as clouds, there are some specific spots that are just

146
00:07:04.079 --> 00:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>they're astronomical showstoppers.

147
00:07:05.879 --> 00:07:09.959
<v Speaker 3>They really are cosmic extremes. In the large Magellanic cloud

148
00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:12.879
<v Speaker 3>you've got the tarantulin Nebula was not as thirty durraatus,

149
00:07:12.959 --> 00:07:16.160
<v Speaker 3>and our sources describe it as an extremely active star

150
00:07:16.279 --> 00:07:19.360
<v Speaker 3>forming region, which is frankly an understatement.

151
00:07:19.480 --> 00:07:22.399
<v Speaker 2>It's the most active region of massive star formation in

152
00:07:22.439 --> 00:07:25.480
<v Speaker 2>our entire local group of galaxies, isn't it? It is?

153
00:07:25.600 --> 00:07:28.839
<v Speaker 3>It is an absolute engine room of stellar creation. It

154
00:07:28.879 --> 00:07:31.759
<v Speaker 3>has some of the biggest, most luminous, most massive stars

155
00:07:31.759 --> 00:07:34.680
<v Speaker 3>we know of, Some are dozens of times the mass

156
00:07:34.680 --> 00:07:35.240
<v Speaker 3>of our Sun.

157
00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that a relatively small low metallis city

158
00:07:38.439 --> 00:07:41.839
<v Speaker 2>galaxy like the LMC can host such a monster star

159
00:07:41.959 --> 00:07:43.920
<v Speaker 2>forming region is a puzzle in itself.

160
00:07:44.199 --> 00:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>It is the radiation and wanes from those newborn giant

161
00:07:48.000 --> 00:07:52.160
<v Speaker 3>stars are just constantly sculpting the gas around them. Studying

162
00:07:52.160 --> 00:07:54.879
<v Speaker 3>them helps us understand the absolute upper limits of star

163
00:07:54.959 --> 00:07:56.079
<v Speaker 3>formation physics.

164
00:07:56.279 --> 00:07:58.759
<v Speaker 2>In the small Magellanic Cloud it has its own version

165
00:07:58.759 --> 00:07:59.040
<v Speaker 2>of those.

166
00:07:59.160 --> 00:08:03.279
<v Speaker 3>It does three six. It's an open star cluster and

167
00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>nebula that's also actively forming a lot of high mass stars.

168
00:08:06.680 --> 00:08:08.240
<v Speaker 2>So it's another real time test bed.

169
00:08:08.399 --> 00:08:11.680
<v Speaker 3>But crucially it's doing it in the even lower metallicity

170
00:08:11.759 --> 00:08:14.759
<v Speaker 3>environment of the SMC, so we get to observe the

171
00:08:14.800 --> 00:08:18.959
<v Speaker 3>same physics but under slightly different, more primitive chemical conditions.

172
00:08:19.079 --> 00:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>It's a perfect comparative study.

173
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:24.439
<v Speaker 2>And beyond these crazy star forming regions, the clouds also

174
00:08:24.480 --> 00:08:28.560
<v Speaker 2>contain objects that are well, they're fundamental to how we

175
00:08:28.600 --> 00:08:29.759
<v Speaker 2>map the entire universe.

176
00:08:29.839 --> 00:08:33.519
<v Speaker 3>You're talking about their huge population of variable stars. Exactly

177
00:08:33.679 --> 00:08:37.840
<v Speaker 3>these stars, specifically the Cepheide variables, are absolutely vital. There

178
00:08:37.879 --> 00:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>are standard candles for the cosmic distance ladder.

179
00:08:40.720 --> 00:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Because the relationship between how fast they pulse and how

180
00:08:43.240 --> 00:08:45.559
<v Speaker 2>bright they truly are is very well.

181
00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Understood, extremely well understood, so you can compare their true

182
00:08:49.000 --> 00:08:51.639
<v Speaker 3>brightness to how bright they appear from Earth, and from

183
00:08:51.679 --> 00:08:56.399
<v Speaker 3>that you can calculate their distance with incredible accuracy.

184
00:08:56.080 --> 00:08:58.879
<v Speaker 2>And by extension, the distance to the galaxy they live

185
00:08:58.919 --> 00:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>in precisely.

186
00:09:00.480 --> 00:09:03.279
<v Speaker 3>And because the Magellanic clouds are so close, we can

187
00:09:03.279 --> 00:09:08.600
<v Speaker 3>make hyper accurate foundational distance measurements to their cepheides. Those

188
00:09:08.679 --> 00:09:12.799
<v Speaker 3>distances then calibrate the entire cosmic distance scale.

189
00:09:12.600 --> 00:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>The yardstick we use to measure the whole universe, all

190
00:09:15.159 --> 00:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>the way up to calculate in the Hubble constant and

191
00:09:17.200 --> 00:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the expansion rate.

192
00:09:18.120 --> 00:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, So, detailed data on the variable stars in the

193
00:09:21.480 --> 00:09:25.159
<v Speaker 3>LMC and SMC is bedrock science for the whole field.

194
00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:27.600
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like they're just constantly churning out stars and

195
00:09:27.679 --> 00:09:29.960
<v Speaker 2>lighting up the cosmos. But you mentioned there's a kind

196
00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:33.639
<v Speaker 2>of inconsistency to their activity levels, not a smooth process.

197
00:09:33.200 --> 00:09:35.399
<v Speaker 3>And this is maybe the most fundamental question about their

198
00:09:35.440 --> 00:09:38.320
<v Speaker 3>internal life that this one thousand and one MC survey

199
00:09:38.399 --> 00:09:40.919
<v Speaker 3>wants to answer. The sources show that even though the

200
00:09:40.919 --> 00:09:43.720
<v Speaker 3>clouds have stars of all ages from very young to

201
00:09:43.840 --> 00:09:47.519
<v Speaker 3>very old, the rate of star formation hasn't been constant.

202
00:09:47.720 --> 00:09:50.360
<v Speaker 2>It seems to happen in what they call episodic bursts.

203
00:09:50.840 --> 00:09:56.679
<v Speaker 3>Exactly episodic brusts, which suggests long periods of relative quiet

204
00:09:56.919 --> 00:10:01.440
<v Speaker 3>punctuated by these intense, spectacular fire displays of starbirth.

205
00:10:01.559 --> 00:10:04.000
<v Speaker 2>But what's pushing the on switch for those fireworks?

206
00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:07.080
<v Speaker 3>That is the core puzzle why the bursts. Is the

207
00:10:07.120 --> 00:10:10.240
<v Speaker 3>gas compression that you need to trigger mass star formation

208
00:10:10.440 --> 00:10:14.480
<v Speaker 3>coming from something internal like complex gas dynamics within the

209
00:10:14.519 --> 00:10:15.360
<v Speaker 3>galaxy itself?

210
00:10:15.440 --> 00:10:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Or is the trigger external?

211
00:10:16.879 --> 00:10:19.879
<v Speaker 3>Right? Is it the gravitational or physical interaction with the

212
00:10:19.919 --> 00:10:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Milky Way, or even just the frequent close passes between

213
00:10:23.000 --> 00:10:25.000
<v Speaker 3>the LMAC and the SMC themselves.

214
00:10:25.480 --> 00:10:27.679
<v Speaker 2>And the source suggests that if the bursts line up

215
00:10:27.679 --> 00:10:31.159
<v Speaker 2>with the times of close gravitational encounters, that would point

216
00:10:31.279 --> 00:10:32.919
<v Speaker 2>very strongly to an external trigger.

217
00:10:33.039 --> 00:10:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, a gravitational shockwave from a close pass can compress

218
00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:39.480
<v Speaker 3>gas and kick off a huge wave of star formation.

219
00:10:40.159 --> 00:10:43.080
<v Speaker 3>But to know that for sure, we need hard data.

220
00:10:43.399 --> 00:10:45.799
<v Speaker 3>We need the precise ages and the motions of the

221
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:47.519
<v Speaker 3>stars that were born in those bursts.

222
00:10:47.519 --> 00:10:49.919
<v Speaker 2>To verify that connection, we need to figure out who's

223
00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:52.799
<v Speaker 2>pushing the nitro button that accelerates everything.

224
00:10:52.480 --> 00:10:55.320
<v Speaker 3>And that leads us perfectly into the instruments that are

225
00:10:55.320 --> 00:10:56.240
<v Speaker 3>designed to find out.

226
00:10:56.519 --> 00:10:59.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So if the clouds of the perfect lab. You

227
00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:03.240
<v Speaker 2>need the perfect tools, and the instruments for this are well,

228
00:11:03.279 --> 00:11:08.200
<v Speaker 2>they're pretty incredible. Right down at the Paranol Observatory in Chile, Oh.

229
00:11:07.799 --> 00:11:09.960
<v Speaker 3>The hardware is state of the art. It all centers

230
00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:11.080
<v Speaker 3>on the Vista Telescope.

231
00:11:11.159 --> 00:11:15.039
<v Speaker 2>VISTA. That's the visible and infrared survey telescope for astronomy.

232
00:11:14.639 --> 00:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, but it's just been given this massive upgrade a

233
00:11:17.159 --> 00:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>new instrument called Foremost.

234
00:11:18.919 --> 00:11:23.679
<v Speaker 2>Four meter multi object spectrograph telescope, So it's spectrograph.

235
00:11:23.240 --> 00:11:27.039
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, which is attached to Vista. Let's start with Visit

236
00:11:27.120 --> 00:11:30.360
<v Speaker 3>itself though. It's got a huge four point one meter

237
00:11:30.519 --> 00:11:31.840
<v Speaker 3>primary mirror.

238
00:11:31.480 --> 00:11:34.840
<v Speaker 2>But its real specialty is its vision. It sees in

239
00:11:34.879 --> 00:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the near infrared.

240
00:11:36.039 --> 00:11:40.480
<v Speaker 3>And that near infrared or NR capability is just crucial.

241
00:11:40.879 --> 00:11:43.519
<v Speaker 3>Vista is the largest telescope in the world dedicated to

242
00:11:43.600 --> 00:11:45.279
<v Speaker 3>wide field surveys in the NIR.

243
00:11:45.600 --> 00:11:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Why is NR so important for this.

244
00:11:47.440 --> 00:11:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Because it lets you see through the dust Galactic dust

245
00:11:50.120 --> 00:11:53.039
<v Speaker 3>particles that block visible light are well, they're basically transparent

246
00:11:53.080 --> 00:11:55.679
<v Speaker 3>to the longer wavelengths of near infrared light, so.

247
00:11:55.600 --> 00:11:57.639
<v Speaker 2>You're not just seeing the bright stars on the surface

248
00:11:57.679 --> 00:12:01.360
<v Speaker 2>of the clouds. You're actually peering right into the heart

249
00:12:01.440 --> 00:12:04.559
<v Speaker 2>of those star forming regions, like deep inside the transil

250
00:12:04.559 --> 00:12:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and neibula precisely.

251
00:12:05.960 --> 00:12:08.399
<v Speaker 3>It lets them do an accurate census of stars that

252
00:12:08.399 --> 00:12:12.360
<v Speaker 3>would be completely invisible in a normal optical light survey.

253
00:12:12.559 --> 00:12:15.360
<v Speaker 3>It's essential for getting a complete, unbiased sample.

254
00:12:15.559 --> 00:12:18.679
<v Speaker 2>And the camera on this thing is it's a monster,

255
00:12:19.480 --> 00:12:22.600
<v Speaker 2>a three ton sixty seven megapixel camera.

256
00:12:22.840 --> 00:12:26.840
<v Speaker 3>It's stunning technology. But Foremost is the new brain of

257
00:12:26.879 --> 00:12:29.559
<v Speaker 3>the operation. That's the upgrade that takes all that light

258
00:12:29.639 --> 00:12:32.279
<v Speaker 3>gathering power and turns it into historical evidence.

259
00:12:32.480 --> 00:12:35.279
<v Speaker 2>A multi object spectrograph what does that actually mean.

260
00:12:35.519 --> 00:12:39.120
<v Speaker 3>It's a fiber fed spectroscopic survey instrument, and the multi

261
00:12:39.240 --> 00:12:41.320
<v Speaker 3>object part is the real game changer.

262
00:12:41.480 --> 00:12:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Instead of looking at one start a time.

263
00:12:43.240 --> 00:12:45.159
<v Speaker 3>Right, instead of pointing at a single star to get

264
00:12:45.200 --> 00:12:49.320
<v Speaker 3>its spectrum, Foremost has this complex robotic positioner that moves

265
00:12:49.440 --> 00:12:52.639
<v Speaker 3>thousands of tiny little optical fibers across the focal plane.

266
00:12:52.679 --> 00:12:54.080
<v Speaker 2>How many targets could I hit at once?

267
00:12:54.200 --> 00:12:56.279
<v Speaker 3>It can collect light from up to twenty four hundred

268
00:12:56.279 --> 00:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>different objects simultaneously in a single observation twenty four hundre

269
00:13:00.200 --> 00:13:04.320
<v Speaker 3>so it's basically doing twenty four hundred separate spectroscopic measurements

270
00:13:04.639 --> 00:13:06.720
<v Speaker 3>in the time it would have taken older instruments to

271
00:13:06.799 --> 00:13:09.320
<v Speaker 3>do maybe one or two. It's the only way you

272
00:13:09.360 --> 00:13:11.039
<v Speaker 3>could hope to get a sample size of half a

273
00:13:11.080 --> 00:13:12.639
<v Speaker 3>million stars in a reasonable time.

274
00:13:12.759 --> 00:13:16.279
<v Speaker 2>That just completely changes the logistics of a survey like this.

275
00:13:16.399 --> 00:13:17.559
<v Speaker 2>So what's the timeline.

276
00:13:17.639 --> 00:13:21.320
<v Speaker 3>This is all happening right now. Foremost achieved first light

277
00:13:21.759 --> 00:13:24.879
<v Speaker 3>back in October twenty twenty five. It's in its commissioning

278
00:13:24.879 --> 00:13:27.879
<v Speaker 3>phase as we speak, getting everything calibrated.

279
00:13:27.399 --> 00:13:29.759
<v Speaker 2>And science operations are scheduled to start.

280
00:13:29.559 --> 00:13:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Soon second quarter of twenty twenty six. And here's the kicker,

281
00:13:32.879 --> 00:13:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the thing that shows you how important this mission is.

282
00:13:35.679 --> 00:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>For a stripped five year period, this to and Foremost

283
00:13:38.919 --> 00:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>are completely dedicated to this program. It excludes all other observations.

284
00:13:43.200 --> 00:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Wow, a five year block on a world class telescope.

285
00:13:46.519 --> 00:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>That's an enormous commitment of astronomical resources.

286
00:13:49.240 --> 00:13:51.759
<v Speaker 3>It is which brings us to the mission itself, one

287
00:13:51.759 --> 00:13:52.480
<v Speaker 3>thousand and one.

288
00:13:52.399 --> 00:13:55.799
<v Speaker 2>MC, the one thousand and one Magellanic Fields co led

289
00:13:55.879 --> 00:13:57.039
<v Speaker 2>by doctor Colinade.

290
00:13:57.080 --> 00:13:59.600
<v Speaker 3>The ambition is just staggering. The goal is to get

291
00:13:59.639 --> 00:14:02.120
<v Speaker 3>the spec of about half a million stars across the

292
00:14:02.159 --> 00:14:05.399
<v Speaker 3>main bodies of the clouds and just as importantly, way

293
00:14:05.480 --> 00:14:08.039
<v Speaker 3>out into their faint, outlying regions.

294
00:14:07.879 --> 00:14:12.879
<v Speaker 2>Half a million individual stellar life stories. So for someone listening,

295
00:14:13.120 --> 00:14:16.279
<v Speaker 2>what's the really crucial data that the spectrograph gives you

296
00:14:16.399 --> 00:14:18.159
<v Speaker 2>that you can't get from just a picture.

297
00:14:18.480 --> 00:14:21.799
<v Speaker 3>It gives you two revolutionary types of data. First, high

298
00:14:21.840 --> 00:14:24.320
<v Speaker 3>precision elemental abundances.

299
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:27.080
<v Speaker 2>The star's chemical fingerprint, it's Perth certificate exactly.

300
00:14:27.600 --> 00:14:31.639
<v Speaker 3>And second, extremely accurate kinematics.

301
00:14:31.360 --> 00:14:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Which is its detailed motion, its travel history, it's velocity

302
00:14:35.240 --> 00:14:36.559
<v Speaker 2>toward us or away from us.

303
00:14:36.840 --> 00:14:39.039
<v Speaker 3>Let's drill down on those abundances for a second. When

304
00:14:39.039 --> 00:14:42.159
<v Speaker 3>you say chemical fingerprint, which elements tell you the most

305
00:14:42.200 --> 00:14:43.000
<v Speaker 3>about the history?

306
00:14:43.200 --> 00:14:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I assume things like iron are important.

307
00:14:45.399 --> 00:14:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Iron is key, yes, for overall metallicity, but also what

308
00:14:49.519 --> 00:14:53.519
<v Speaker 3>are called the alpha elements, things like magnesium and titanium.

309
00:14:53.799 --> 00:14:56.639
<v Speaker 3>The ratio of iron to these alpha elements is super

310
00:14:56.679 --> 00:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>sensitive to the history of star formation. No so, because slow,

311
00:15:00.480 --> 00:15:03.840
<v Speaker 3>steady rate of star formation produces a different chemical ratio

312
00:15:03.960 --> 00:15:07.000
<v Speaker 3>than a rapid, intense burst, does it tells you about

313
00:15:07.039 --> 00:15:09.080
<v Speaker 3>the rate of enrichment, not just the amount.

314
00:15:08.879 --> 00:15:11.679
<v Speaker 2>And the kinematics. How does the spectrograph measure motion?

315
00:15:12.080 --> 00:15:15.120
<v Speaker 3>It all comes down to the Doppler effect. Light from

316
00:15:15.120 --> 00:15:18.080
<v Speaker 3>a star moving toward use gets slightly blue.

317
00:15:17.759 --> 00:15:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Shifted, its wavelengths get compressed right.

318
00:15:20.519 --> 00:15:22.759
<v Speaker 3>And light from a star moving away gets red shifted,

319
00:15:22.799 --> 00:15:25.879
<v Speaker 3>its wavelengths get stretched, And you need a high resolution

320
00:15:26.000 --> 00:15:30.039
<v Speaker 3>spectrograph to measure those tiny shifts with enough precision to

321
00:15:30.080 --> 00:15:34.080
<v Speaker 3>get the star's velocity down to say a kilometer per second.

322
00:15:34.279 --> 00:15:36.919
<v Speaker 2>So you get the star's life history from its chemistry

323
00:15:37.039 --> 00:15:39.679
<v Speaker 2>and its current path from its motion and Doctor Colony

324
00:15:39.720 --> 00:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>and specifically mentioned measuring this data in the outskirts.

325
00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:46.759
<v Speaker 3>Why is that so important, Because the outskirts the halos

326
00:15:46.799 --> 00:15:48.840
<v Speaker 3>of these galaxies are where the tug of war is

327
00:15:48.879 --> 00:15:52.679
<v Speaker 3>most obvious. If the Milky Way is tidally pulling material

328
00:15:52.720 --> 00:15:55.600
<v Speaker 3>off the clouds, it's going to strip the stars and

329
00:15:55.639 --> 00:15:57.120
<v Speaker 3>gas from the edges first.

330
00:15:57.159 --> 00:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Those are the regions that are most weakly held on

331
00:15:59.360 --> 00:16:00.159
<v Speaker 2>by the clouds side.

332
00:16:00.200 --> 00:16:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Gravity exactly, and they're very faint, which is why you

333
00:16:03.399 --> 00:16:07.399
<v Speaker 3>need Vista's wide field and niur sensitivity and foremost ability

334
00:16:07.440 --> 00:16:09.320
<v Speaker 3>to target faint stars so efficiently.

335
00:16:09.600 --> 00:16:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Her quote really sums it all up, doesn't it. She said.

336
00:16:12.480 --> 00:16:15.240
<v Speaker 2>The goal is to trace the effects of interactions between

337
00:16:15.240 --> 00:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the clouds by analyzing the kinematics and abundances of their

338
00:16:19.399 --> 00:16:22.320
<v Speaker 2>stellar populations, particularly in the outskirts.

339
00:16:22.559 --> 00:16:25.360
<v Speaker 3>That's it in a nutshell. The focus is on finding

340
00:16:25.399 --> 00:16:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the physical scars left by these massive gravitational fights.

341
00:16:29.600 --> 00:16:32.879
<v Speaker 2>So this incredible new data set is really designed to

342
00:16:32.960 --> 00:16:37.000
<v Speaker 2>test some of the biggest, most revolutionary ideas happening in

343
00:16:37.080 --> 00:16:40.600
<v Speaker 2>galactic dynamics right now. For decades, we had a pretty

344
00:16:40.600 --> 00:16:43.279
<v Speaker 2>comfortable story about how the Milky Way and the clouds

345
00:16:43.279 --> 00:16:44.000
<v Speaker 2>were interacting.

346
00:16:44.159 --> 00:16:47.000
<v Speaker 3>We did. The old paradigm was that the clouds were

347
00:16:47.039 --> 00:16:50.120
<v Speaker 3>ancient satellites. They had been orbiting the Milky Way for

348
00:16:50.320 --> 00:16:54.159
<v Speaker 3>maybe ten billion years. They'd completed lots of passes.

349
00:16:53.759 --> 00:16:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Which implied a long slow history of co evolution, a very.

350
00:16:57.240 --> 00:16:59.639
<v Speaker 3>Long slow dance. But the sources are clear that this

351
00:16:59.759 --> 00:17:02.720
<v Speaker 3>law held idea has just been completely challenged, and that's

352
00:17:02.759 --> 00:17:05.000
<v Speaker 3>what created the urgency for one thousand and one MC.

353
00:17:05.319 --> 00:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>What was it that shifted the foundation of that theory.

354
00:17:07.880 --> 00:17:10.880
<v Speaker 3>The shift came from the ESA's Gaya Mission Ayah, which.

355
00:17:10.759 --> 00:17:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Is just mapping everything with insane precision.

356
00:17:13.440 --> 00:17:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Insane precision. Its strength is mapping the positions and the

357
00:17:17.160 --> 00:17:21.799
<v Speaker 3>proper motions. That's the sideways movement of billions of stars,

358
00:17:22.160 --> 00:17:24.839
<v Speaker 3>and that data, when you combine it with some older

359
00:17:25.000 --> 00:17:30.039
<v Speaker 3>Hubble observations, it suggests something well, something revolutionary, which is

360
00:17:30.200 --> 00:17:32.759
<v Speaker 3>that the clouds might be on their very first passage

361
00:17:32.799 --> 00:17:33.559
<v Speaker 3>by the Milky Way.

362
00:17:33.640 --> 00:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Hold on their first pass not ancient satellites that have

363
00:17:38.559 --> 00:17:40.240
<v Speaker 2>been orbiting for billions.

364
00:17:39.839 --> 00:17:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Of years exactly. They might just be newcomers, just arriving

365
00:17:42.960 --> 00:17:44.920
<v Speaker 3>in our cosmic neighborhood for the first time.

366
00:17:45.119 --> 00:17:48.039
<v Speaker 2>That's a massive revision of their history. If they're new,

367
00:17:48.079 --> 00:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>it means all the dramatic effects we see, the star formation,

368
00:17:51.200 --> 00:17:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the gas streams, all of that has to be the

369
00:17:53.440 --> 00:17:56.960
<v Speaker 2>result of a fresh, violent, rapid encounter, not.

370
00:17:56.960 --> 00:18:00.799
<v Speaker 3>A slow, billions of years long orbital decay. That's the

371
00:18:00.839 --> 00:18:04.160
<v Speaker 3>profound implication. If they're on a first pass, their relationship

372
00:18:04.200 --> 00:18:06.400
<v Speaker 3>with the Milky Way has only just begun.

373
00:18:06.240 --> 00:18:08.880
<v Speaker 2>And that has to have huge implications for understanding our

374
00:18:08.880 --> 00:18:09.759
<v Speaker 2>own galaxy too.

375
00:18:10.119 --> 00:18:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh massive. It changes our estimates for the total mass

376
00:18:13.440 --> 00:18:15.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Milky Way, because if the clouds are moving

377
00:18:15.960 --> 00:18:19.160
<v Speaker 3>fast enough to just be passing through, our galaxy has

378
00:18:19.200 --> 00:18:21.880
<v Speaker 3>to be heavy enough to have captured them only temporarily,

379
00:18:22.079 --> 00:18:23.359
<v Speaker 3>or to be pulling them into orbit.

380
00:18:23.440 --> 00:18:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Right now, not having held onto them for eons. It

381
00:18:26.319 --> 00:18:29.880
<v Speaker 2>affects our understanding of our own dark matter halo absolutely.

382
00:18:30.319 --> 00:18:33.240
<v Speaker 3>And the most dramatic piece of evidence for this interaction,

383
00:18:33.319 --> 00:18:36.720
<v Speaker 3>whether it's old or new, is the huge stream of

384
00:18:36.759 --> 00:18:39.559
<v Speaker 3>material we see being ripped away from the clouds right now,

385
00:18:39.799 --> 00:18:43.559
<v Speaker 3>the Magelanic stream, the Magelanic stream, this enormous ribbon of

386
00:18:43.599 --> 00:18:46.839
<v Speaker 3>gas that trails hundreds of thousands of light years behind

387
00:18:46.880 --> 00:18:50.119
<v Speaker 3>the clouds, stretching down toward the Milky Way's south pole.

388
00:18:50.680 --> 00:18:53.359
<v Speaker 3>And there's also the leading arm, which is material fling

389
00:18:53.400 --> 00:18:54.039
<v Speaker 3>out ahead of them.

390
00:18:54.359 --> 00:18:57.319
<v Speaker 2>These things are just immense physical scars that shows something

391
00:18:57.359 --> 00:18:58.799
<v Speaker 2>dramatic is happening.

392
00:18:58.599 --> 00:19:03.240
<v Speaker 3>And their very existence immediately raises three competing ideas about

393
00:19:03.279 --> 00:19:05.559
<v Speaker 3>how they were created, which is what one thousand and

394
00:19:05.559 --> 00:19:07.359
<v Speaker 3>one MC is perfectly designed to test.

395
00:19:07.519 --> 00:19:10.640
<v Speaker 2>We need to figure out which force is responsible because

396
00:19:10.680 --> 00:19:12.839
<v Speaker 2>each one leaves a different kind of signature.

397
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:16.359
<v Speaker 3>That's the challenge. Is it hypothesis one, two, or three

398
00:19:16.519 --> 00:19:18.680
<v Speaker 3>or a mix of all of them? And the key

399
00:19:18.720 --> 00:19:21.319
<v Speaker 3>to figuring it out is in the kinematic and chemical

400
00:19:21.440 --> 00:19:23.119
<v Speaker 3>data from one thousand and one MC.

401
00:19:23.359 --> 00:19:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's take the first one RAM pressure stripping.

402
00:19:26.279 --> 00:19:29.240
<v Speaker 3>Ram pressure stripping is what happens when the clouds plow

403
00:19:29.319 --> 00:19:32.359
<v Speaker 3>through the thin hot gas that makes up the Milky

404
00:19:32.400 --> 00:19:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Way's extended halo. It's like a cosmic headwind, a perfect analogy.

405
00:19:36.559 --> 00:19:39.519
<v Speaker 3>The pressure of that headwind just pushes the gas right

406
00:19:39.519 --> 00:19:42.680
<v Speaker 3>out of the dwarf galaxies, stripping it away. But crucially,

407
00:19:42.759 --> 00:19:45.640
<v Speaker 3>this mechanism mostly strips away gas, not.

408
00:19:45.720 --> 00:19:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Stars, because the stars are much more tightly bound by gravity.

409
00:19:49.039 --> 00:19:52.119
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, So if the Magellanic string was purely from ram pressure,

410
00:19:52.200 --> 00:19:54.119
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't expect to find many stars in.

411
00:19:54.079 --> 00:19:57.880
<v Speaker 2>It, Okay. But then there's the second hypothesis title stripping.

412
00:19:58.119 --> 00:20:00.920
<v Speaker 3>That's the purely gravitational pull of the Milky Way.

413
00:20:01.000 --> 00:20:04.160
<v Speaker 2>The galaxy's gravity just yank's material off the edges of

414
00:20:04.200 --> 00:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the clouds.

415
00:20:04.799 --> 00:20:07.759
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And because it's purely gravitational, it affects both the

416
00:20:07.799 --> 00:20:10.960
<v Speaker 3>gas and the stars, especially those in the outer regions

417
00:20:11.000 --> 00:20:13.240
<v Speaker 3>where the cloud's own gravity is weakest.

418
00:20:13.480 --> 00:20:16.079
<v Speaker 2>So if a one thousand and one MC finds a

419
00:20:16.079 --> 00:20:19.200
<v Speaker 2>lot of stars in the Magellanic stream and their motions

420
00:20:19.200 --> 00:20:22.160
<v Speaker 2>show they're on these wide, high velocity paths that follow

421
00:20:22.200 --> 00:20:25.279
<v Speaker 2>the stream, that would be strong evidence for tidle stripping.

422
00:20:25.559 --> 00:20:28.839
<v Speaker 3>That is, the core methodology, the kinematics of the stars

423
00:20:28.920 --> 00:20:32.440
<v Speaker 3>act as the filter tidle. Stripping leaves a very specific

424
00:20:32.599 --> 00:20:37.400
<v Speaker 3>kinematic signature. RAM pressure predicts fewer strip stars and their

425
00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:39.200
<v Speaker 3>motion would be more irregular.

426
00:20:39.400 --> 00:20:42.559
<v Speaker 2>And then there's the third hypothesis, which kind of complicates everything.

427
00:20:42.920 --> 00:20:46.000
<v Speaker 2>The interactions between the LMC and the SMC themselves.

428
00:20:46.240 --> 00:20:49.279
<v Speaker 3>They're close enough that their own gravity is causing problems

429
00:20:49.279 --> 00:20:51.839
<v Speaker 3>for each other. The LMC is much bigger than the SMC,

430
00:20:52.240 --> 00:20:56.039
<v Speaker 3>and it's actively distorting its smaller companion. Some models even

431
00:20:56.079 --> 00:20:59.160
<v Speaker 3>suggest the stream was created mainly by the LMC ripping

432
00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:00.519
<v Speaker 3>material off SMC.

433
00:21:00.759 --> 00:21:02.880
<v Speaker 2>That seems like the hardest one to untangle. How does

434
00:21:02.920 --> 00:21:04.319
<v Speaker 2>one thousand and one MC solve that?

435
00:21:04.559 --> 00:21:06.920
<v Speaker 3>This is where the chemical abundance data becomes.

436
00:21:06.640 --> 00:21:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Your second filter chemical tagging.

437
00:21:08.599 --> 00:21:10.799
<v Speaker 3>Right, if you find a star in the stream that

438
00:21:10.920 --> 00:21:15.039
<v Speaker 3>has the low metallicity chemical fingerprint of the SMC, you

439
00:21:15.160 --> 00:21:17.519
<v Speaker 3>know it came from the SMC. Then you look at

440
00:21:17.559 --> 00:21:20.720
<v Speaker 3>its motion. If its path suggests it was flung out

441
00:21:20.799 --> 00:21:23.359
<v Speaker 3>during a close pass with the LMC, you know that

442
00:21:23.440 --> 00:21:24.640
<v Speaker 3>interaction was dominant.

443
00:21:24.799 --> 00:21:27.559
<v Speaker 2>But if a star with an LMC fingerprint is on

444
00:21:27.640 --> 00:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>a path that clearly follows the Milky Way's tidal forces,

445
00:21:31.200 --> 00:21:32.799
<v Speaker 2>then the Milky Ways the main culprit.

446
00:21:33.079 --> 00:21:36.799
<v Speaker 3>It's an astronomical forensics investigation, and you need the chemical

447
00:21:36.839 --> 00:21:40.000
<v Speaker 3>tags from half a million stars to get enough data

448
00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:41.839
<v Speaker 3>points to separate these different effects.

449
00:21:41.880 --> 00:21:43.680
<v Speaker 2>And this all ties back to that question of the

450
00:21:43.680 --> 00:21:46.880
<v Speaker 2>episodic star formation. Yeah, what triggers the bursts exactly?

451
00:21:47.000 --> 00:21:49.519
<v Speaker 3>The survey gives us the tools to finally connect those

452
00:21:49.519 --> 00:21:52.000
<v Speaker 3>two phenomena. We can figure out the age of a

453
00:21:52.039 --> 00:21:54.799
<v Speaker 3>group of stars from their chemistry and life cycle stage,

454
00:21:54.920 --> 00:21:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and we can correlate that age with the history of interactions.

455
00:21:57.559 --> 00:21:59.599
<v Speaker 2>So you can ask did a burst of star formation

456
00:21:59.680 --> 00:22:02.079
<v Speaker 2>happen and right when the clouds were making a close

457
00:22:02.119 --> 00:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>pass to the Milky Way, or when the LMC and

458
00:22:04.799 --> 00:22:06.200
<v Speaker 2>SMC were closest to each other.

459
00:22:06.480 --> 00:22:09.319
<v Speaker 3>That's the key. If the star is born in that burst,

460
00:22:09.519 --> 00:22:12.799
<v Speaker 3>are kinematically linked to material that was just compressed or

461
00:22:12.839 --> 00:22:16.200
<v Speaker 3>flung out by shockwave, that's a strong argument for an

462
00:22:16.200 --> 00:22:17.000
<v Speaker 3>external trigger.

463
00:22:17.319 --> 00:22:20.960
<v Speaker 2>And if they're just randomly distributed, it points to internal processes.

464
00:22:21.119 --> 00:22:24.519
<v Speaker 3>Right. And finally, all this ties into understanding the chemical

465
00:22:24.559 --> 00:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>evolution and what are called metallicity gradients across the clouds.

466
00:22:28.640 --> 00:22:30.680
<v Speaker 2>The abundance data doesn't just tell you if a star

467
00:22:30.759 --> 00:22:33.920
<v Speaker 2>is metal poor, it tells you how those elements are distributed.

468
00:22:34.079 --> 00:22:37.319
<v Speaker 3>A metallicity gradient just tracks how the concentration of heavy

469
00:22:37.319 --> 00:22:40.039
<v Speaker 3>elements changes as you move from the center of a

470
00:22:40.039 --> 00:22:41.799
<v Speaker 3>galaxy out to its edge.

471
00:22:41.839 --> 00:22:44.039
<v Speaker 2>And typically you'd expect it to be highest in the

472
00:22:44.039 --> 00:22:45.079
<v Speaker 2>center and then drop off.

473
00:22:45.200 --> 00:22:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Generally, yes, and the steepness of that gradient tells you

474
00:22:48.480 --> 00:22:51.839
<v Speaker 3>about the history of gas flow and mixing. If galaxy

475
00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:55.079
<v Speaker 3>has been constantly stirred up by interactions, the gradient will

476
00:22:55.079 --> 00:22:57.920
<v Speaker 3>be shallower the elements get spread out. If the gas

477
00:22:58.000 --> 00:22:59.920
<v Speaker 3>days put, the gradient will be steep.

478
00:23:00.319 --> 00:23:04.640
<v Speaker 2>So the chemistry of the stars actually reveals the plumbing

479
00:23:04.640 --> 00:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>system and the mixing efficiency of the galaxy's gas.

480
00:23:08.079 --> 00:23:11.119
<v Speaker 3>That's a huge leap, a massive leap in our understanding.

481
00:23:11.440 --> 00:23:15.000
<v Speaker 2>So someone listening might be thinking, Okay, but we've known

482
00:23:15.039 --> 00:23:18.200
<v Speaker 2>about these clouds forever. We've pointed huge telescopes at them

483
00:23:18.240 --> 00:23:20.960
<v Speaker 2>for decades. Why is this survey the one that's going

484
00:23:21.000 --> 00:23:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to crack it.

485
00:23:21.720 --> 00:23:23.920
<v Speaker 3>That's a really good question, and the answer comes down

486
00:23:23.920 --> 00:23:26.119
<v Speaker 3>to one word spectroscopy.

487
00:23:26.559 --> 00:23:30.519
<v Speaker 2>Because all those other big surveys, you know, VMC, STEP, smash,

488
00:23:30.640 --> 00:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>ogl E, they were mostly doing photometry overwhelmingly.

489
00:23:34.359 --> 00:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>And photometry is great. You know. It gives you brightness,

490
00:23:36.519 --> 00:23:39.279
<v Speaker 3>it gives you color, It can track changes in brightness

491
00:23:39.319 --> 00:23:39.880
<v Speaker 3>over time.

492
00:23:40.039 --> 00:23:42.440
<v Speaker 2>It gives you a beautiful detailed map.

493
00:23:42.240 --> 00:23:45.920
<v Speaker 3>A beautiful but kind of flat map. It tells you

494
00:23:45.960 --> 00:23:47.759
<v Speaker 3>what a star looks like and where it is. It

495
00:23:47.759 --> 00:23:50.640
<v Speaker 3>does not tell you two absolutely vital things what.

496
00:23:50.559 --> 00:23:52.960
<v Speaker 2>It's made of and how fast it's moving toward or

497
00:23:53.000 --> 00:23:54.359
<v Speaker 2>away from you exactly.

498
00:23:55.000 --> 00:23:59.799
<v Speaker 3>And the official European Southern Observatory documentation for Foremost says

499
00:23:59.799 --> 00:24:02.640
<v Speaker 3>it directly. It points out that there is a pronounced

500
00:24:02.680 --> 00:24:06.880
<v Speaker 3>lack of spectroscopic observations across the range of stellar populations

501
00:24:06.880 --> 00:24:10.599
<v Speaker 3>and substructures of the Magellanic clouds. That lack of spectral

502
00:24:10.640 --> 00:24:12.559
<v Speaker 3>data is the scientific bottleneck.

503
00:24:12.839 --> 00:24:15.880
<v Speaker 2>So why does spectroscopy breaking the light down into its

504
00:24:15.920 --> 00:24:19.400
<v Speaker 2>component wavelengths. Why does that change the game so much

505
00:24:19.400 --> 00:24:21.079
<v Speaker 2>for these specific questions.

506
00:24:21.279 --> 00:24:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Because it's the only way to measure the tiny Dopplar

507
00:24:24.240 --> 00:24:26.680
<v Speaker 3>shift you need for kinematics, and the only way to

508
00:24:26.720 --> 00:24:29.519
<v Speaker 3>see the absorption lines that tell you the elemental composition,

509
00:24:30.039 --> 00:24:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and the quality has to be extremely high.

510
00:24:32.880 --> 00:24:35.319
<v Speaker 2>You can't just do low resolution spectroscopy.

511
00:24:35.400 --> 00:24:37.799
<v Speaker 3>No, Because that might give you a rough idea of

512
00:24:38.079 --> 00:24:41.200
<v Speaker 3>total metallicity, but it's not good enough for the technique

513
00:24:41.200 --> 00:24:43.400
<v Speaker 3>they're relying on, which is chemical tagging.

514
00:24:43.519 --> 00:24:46.039
<v Speaker 2>Chemical tagging it sounds like a forensic technique.

515
00:24:45.799 --> 00:24:49.240
<v Speaker 3>It is entirely forensic. Stars are born from huge clouds

516
00:24:49.279 --> 00:24:52.559
<v Speaker 3>of gas, and that gas cloud, at the moment it

517
00:24:52.599 --> 00:24:57.720
<v Speaker 3>collapses to form stars, it has a unique uniform chemical signature.

518
00:24:57.359 --> 00:25:00.799
<v Speaker 2>Its specific blend of iron, oxygen and sol right.

519
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Which depends on which supernovae enriched it right before it collapsed.

520
00:25:03.960 --> 00:25:06.200
<v Speaker 3>So every single star born from that cloud is a

521
00:25:06.279 --> 00:25:09.839
<v Speaker 3>chemical sibling. They share an identical chemical fingerprint.

522
00:25:09.359 --> 00:25:11.680
<v Speaker 2>And they keep that fingerprint for their entire life.

523
00:25:11.880 --> 00:25:15.119
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so even if those siblings get thrown to opposite

524
00:25:15.160 --> 00:25:18.880
<v Speaker 3>ends of the galaxy by gravitational forces over billions of years,

525
00:25:19.519 --> 00:25:22.079
<v Speaker 3>their elemental abundance ratios stay the same.

526
00:25:22.440 --> 00:25:26.480
<v Speaker 2>So by analyzing their chemical fingerprints with high resolution spectroscopy,

527
00:25:26.759 --> 00:25:30.079
<v Speaker 2>you can prove that two stars that are now thousands

528
00:25:30.119 --> 00:25:32.559
<v Speaker 2>of light years apart were actually born together.

529
00:25:32.799 --> 00:25:36.160
<v Speaker 3>That is the profound part. You can reconstruct the original

530
00:25:36.160 --> 00:25:40.160
<v Speaker 3>birthplace of populations that were scattered by the Milky Way's influence.

531
00:25:39.799 --> 00:25:42.680
<v Speaker 2>And previous spectroscopic surveys just didn't have the power to

532
00:25:42.759 --> 00:25:43.039
<v Speaker 2>do this.

533
00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:45.759
<v Speaker 3>They lacked the sheer volume of targets and the high

534
00:25:45.799 --> 00:25:49.319
<v Speaker 3>resolution needed for this kind of detailed chemical analysis across

535
00:25:49.319 --> 00:25:52.319
<v Speaker 3>such a huge population. They could tell us the clouds

536
00:25:52.319 --> 00:25:55.200
<v Speaker 3>were metal poor, but they couldn't reliably do this tagging

537
00:25:55.400 --> 00:25:56.880
<v Speaker 3>to trace where stars came from.

538
00:25:57.119 --> 00:25:59.079
<v Speaker 2>So the advantage of the one thousand and one mc

539
00:25:59.279 --> 00:26:02.400
<v Speaker 2>is really three five. The sheer number of stars, the

540
00:26:02.440 --> 00:26:05.680
<v Speaker 2>wide area covers including the outskirts, and the high resolution

541
00:26:05.759 --> 00:26:06.359
<v Speaker 2>of the data.

542
00:26:06.440 --> 00:26:10.359
<v Speaker 3>That combination is what makes it revolutionary. The ESO documents

543
00:26:10.400 --> 00:26:13.680
<v Speaker 3>describe it as allowing for a comprehensive study of the

544
00:26:13.720 --> 00:26:16.920
<v Speaker 3>kinematics and chemistry of a large number of stars at

545
00:26:16.920 --> 00:26:21.599
<v Speaker 3>different evolutionary phases and with a wide spatial distribution.

546
00:26:21.599 --> 00:26:24.240
<v Speaker 2>So getting the depth of chemistry and the bredth of

547
00:26:24.319 --> 00:26:27.359
<v Speaker 2>kinematics across the entire system for the first time exactly.

548
00:26:27.599 --> 00:26:29.680
<v Speaker 2>So what does this mean for that GAYA data? Can

549
00:26:29.720 --> 00:26:32.480
<v Speaker 2>one thousand and one mc actually confirm or deny the

550
00:26:32.519 --> 00:26:33.559
<v Speaker 2>first pass idea?

551
00:26:33.759 --> 00:26:37.440
<v Speaker 3>It can provide the final critical piece of confirmation. GAYA

552
00:26:37.519 --> 00:26:41.519
<v Speaker 3>measures the proper motion right the sideways movement across the sky.

553
00:26:41.720 --> 00:26:43.599
<v Speaker 2>But to know if something is truly bound to the

554
00:26:43.640 --> 00:26:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Milky Way just flying by. You need its full three

555
00:26:46.720 --> 00:26:47.400
<v Speaker 2>D velocity.

556
00:26:47.519 --> 00:26:50.279
<v Speaker 3>You do, and you're missing the radial velocity how fast

557
00:26:50.359 --> 00:26:53.880
<v Speaker 3>it's moving toward or away from us. Foremost high precision

558
00:26:53.920 --> 00:26:57.079
<v Speaker 3>kinematic measurements provide exactly that missing piece.

559
00:26:56.920 --> 00:27:00.519
<v Speaker 2>And once you combine those two velocity components, you get

560
00:27:00.519 --> 00:27:01.880
<v Speaker 2>the true three D space.

561
00:27:01.720 --> 00:27:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Velocity, which is the ultimate test. It tells you their

562
00:27:04.400 --> 00:27:07.160
<v Speaker 3>orbital energy and whether they're gravitationally bound to the Milky

563
00:27:07.160 --> 00:27:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Way or if they really are just newcomers passing through,

564
00:27:09.720 --> 00:27:10.519
<v Speaker 3>which brings.

565
00:27:10.279 --> 00:27:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Us back to the ultimate goal. This isn't really just

566
00:27:12.799 --> 00:27:15.079
<v Speaker 2>about the LMC and SMC, not at all.

567
00:27:15.160 --> 00:27:18.440
<v Speaker 3>It's about refining our knowledge of how all galaxies evolve.

568
00:27:19.000 --> 00:27:22.200
<v Speaker 3>The Magellanic Clouds are our best, and maybe our only

569
00:27:22.440 --> 00:27:25.839
<v Speaker 3>opportunity in the local universe to study the life cycles

570
00:27:25.880 --> 00:27:29.559
<v Speaker 3>of these gas rich dwarf galaxies in such detail.

571
00:27:29.279 --> 00:27:32.359
<v Speaker 2>To see how they form stars in metal poor environments,

572
00:27:32.400 --> 00:27:35.680
<v Speaker 2>how they move gas around, how they interact, and how

573
00:27:35.680 --> 00:27:38.160
<v Speaker 2>they evolve under these huge external forces.

574
00:27:38.279 --> 00:27:40.440
<v Speaker 3>This data set, when it's complete, is going to be

575
00:27:40.559 --> 00:27:45.039
<v Speaker 3>the bedrock for modeling dwarf galaxy evolution and for testing

576
00:27:45.079 --> 00:27:47.519
<v Speaker 3>our big cosmological simulations for decades.

577
00:27:47.680 --> 00:27:51.599
<v Speaker 2>It promises to finally resolve these decades long arguments over

578
00:27:51.640 --> 00:27:54.559
<v Speaker 2>their history and the powerful forces that are shaping those

579
00:27:54.599 --> 00:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>incredible Magellanic streams.

580
00:27:56.119 --> 00:27:57.240
<v Speaker 3>It's an amazing project.

581
00:27:57.359 --> 00:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Okay, so this is this is a genuinely monument

582
00:28:00.000 --> 00:28:00.759
<v Speaker 2>mental project.

583
00:28:00.920 --> 00:28:01.519
<v Speaker 3>It really is.

584
00:28:01.720 --> 00:28:03.640
<v Speaker 2>So just to sort of wrap up the main points here,

585
00:28:03.680 --> 00:28:06.319
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about a five year dedicated.

586
00:28:05.759 --> 00:28:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Program using the foremost spectrograph on the Vista telescope.

587
00:28:09.359 --> 00:28:11.559
<v Speaker 2>To get the spectra of half a million stars, which.

588
00:28:11.480 --> 00:28:14.079
<v Speaker 3>Gives us their chemistry and their motion, the two things

589
00:28:14.079 --> 00:28:14.680
<v Speaker 3>we were missing.

590
00:28:14.960 --> 00:28:18.440
<v Speaker 2>And this spectroscopic power is what's going to let researchers

591
00:28:18.480 --> 00:28:23.079
<v Speaker 2>finally test these huge new ideas, like confirming or denying

592
00:28:23.200 --> 00:28:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the Gaya data that suggests the clouds might be on

593
00:28:25.759 --> 00:28:27.720
<v Speaker 2>their very first pass by the Milky Way.

594
00:28:27.720 --> 00:28:31.519
<v Speaker 3>And crucially using that chemical, tacking and motion data to

595
00:28:31.640 --> 00:28:35.559
<v Speaker 3>finally figure out what created the Magellanic stream, whether it

596
00:28:35.640 --> 00:28:38.960
<v Speaker 3>was title stripping, ram pressure or the clouds fighting with

597
00:28:39.000 --> 00:28:39.400
<v Speaker 3>each other.

598
00:28:39.599 --> 00:28:42.279
<v Speaker 2>So by the time this is all done, astronomers will

599
00:28:42.279 --> 00:28:47.640
<v Speaker 2>have the most comprehensive, detailed, high resolution spectroscopic data set

600
00:28:48.000 --> 00:28:50.599
<v Speaker 2>ever put together for dwarf galaxies.

601
00:28:50.160 --> 00:28:52.839
<v Speaker 3>And that data is essential for finding real answers about

602
00:28:52.920 --> 00:28:56.680
<v Speaker 3>gas mixing, star formation bursts, and rewriting the history of

603
00:28:56.720 --> 00:28:58.160
<v Speaker 3>our closest galactic neighbors.

604
00:28:58.200 --> 00:29:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so for our final thought for you to ponder,

605
00:29:00.960 --> 00:29:03.359
<v Speaker 2>we spend a lot of time on this revolutionary idea

606
00:29:03.440 --> 00:29:06.559
<v Speaker 2>that the Magellanic clouds might be on their very first pass.

607
00:29:06.400 --> 00:29:09.039
<v Speaker 3>Meaning their gravitational interaction with the Milky Way is only

608
00:29:09.079 --> 00:29:09.599
<v Speaker 3>just beginning.

609
00:29:09.839 --> 00:29:13.079
<v Speaker 2>So if that first pass hypothesis turns out to be true,

610
00:29:13.519 --> 00:29:16.400
<v Speaker 2>if the clouds have only recently encountered the Milky Way's

611
00:29:16.480 --> 00:29:20.839
<v Speaker 2>massive gravitational and gaseous halo, what does the already vast

612
00:29:20.839 --> 00:29:23.519
<v Speaker 2>and dramatic appearance of the Magellan extreme tell us.

613
00:29:23.759 --> 00:29:26.319
<v Speaker 3>It implies that the forces of gravity and ram pressure

614
00:29:26.400 --> 00:29:29.920
<v Speaker 3>are so incredibly potent that they don't need billions of

615
00:29:30.000 --> 00:29:33.279
<v Speaker 3>years of slow, gradual work. They can rip material off

616
00:29:33.279 --> 00:29:35.839
<v Speaker 3>a galaxy and stretch it across hundreds of thousands of

617
00:29:35.880 --> 00:29:39.319
<v Speaker 3>light years in what is cosmically speaking, a brief moment.

618
00:29:39.440 --> 00:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>The streams aren't the result of a slow bleed over eons.

619
00:29:42.359 --> 00:29:45.599
<v Speaker 3>No, they are the evidence of an unbelievably powerful, almost

620
00:29:45.599 --> 00:29:48.640
<v Speaker 3>instantaneous cosmic collision and the one thousand and one MC

621
00:29:48.759 --> 00:29:50.839
<v Speaker 3>spectra will be what tells us just how violent that

622
00:29:50.880 --> 00:30:35.279
<v Speaker 3>first encounter truly is. Stas
