Speaker 1: Escape Tomorrow Rubber Resort. Hey everyone, this is Jack Fairshawd's
Speaker 1: the Right Side Radio program and License reviewed, and I
Speaker 1: want to talk to you for a second about my pillow.
Speaker 1: My pillow is quite simply the finest pillow on the market.
Speaker 1: My pillows patented interlocking fills adjust to your individual sleep
Speaker 1: needs regardless of sleeping position. This innovative fill then holds
Speaker 1: that position all night, helping you fall asleep faster, stay
Speaker 1: asleep longer. The founder and owner of My Pillow, Mike Lindell,
Speaker 1: personally guarantees that my pillow will be the most comfortable
Speaker 1: pillow you'll ever own, and I'll add my own guarantee
Speaker 1: as well. And right now you can get up to
Speaker 1: eighty percent off of all My Pillow products, including bed sheets, slippers, towels,
Speaker 1: down comforters, mattress toppers, even coffee when you go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com and enter the special promo code
Speaker 1: Midnight Ride no space in between Midnight and Ride and
Speaker 1: remember enter the promo code m I D N I
Speaker 1: G H t R I D E and save big
Speaker 1: while getting the best night's sleep you've ever had. This
Speaker 1: show is a part of the Midnight Ride Network. Sam
Speaker 1: with your name.
Speaker 2: At the time of n a statue started singing this
Speaker 2: and eagle fly Tennis gonna be here when you out
Speaker 2: of the free of starting feel and it'll be who
Speaker 2: like the whole.
Speaker 1: Man is nain and down.
Speaker 2: Broughtie courtesy and wild.
Speaker 1: And blue liberals be worn.
Speaker 3: Your viewpoints will be subjected to straight scrutiny.
Speaker 1: You're listening to Right Side Radio.
Speaker 3: It's like my eyes have been blown wide. We have
Speaker 3: come together here because the American people deserve better from
Speaker 3: those to whom they entrust, our nation's highest officers. We've
Speaker 3: dan united and are resolved to do something about it, which,
Speaker 3: whether we like it or not, spell's judy if you
Speaker 3: and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
Speaker 2: You tuned in to right Side Radio.
Speaker 1: All right, guys, you have founded it is the Right
Speaker 1: Side Radio Program, recording this episode on Wednesday, February the fifth,
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five. I'm your host, Jack Fairchild, so welcoming
Speaker 1: you back here to the Right Side Radio Program. And
Speaker 1: of course, if you've not already done so, please remember
Speaker 1: to like and subscribe to the Right Side Radio Program.
Speaker 1: Remember we're on iTunes, I Heart Radio, Spotify, Spreaker, Amazon Music,
Speaker 1: and many many more, so make sure that you are
Speaker 1: subscribed to the right Side Radio program on your podcatcher
Speaker 1: of choice. Of course, that I am excited to announce
Speaker 1: that I have taken a new position with the local
Speaker 1: paper here, the Laurel Leader Call, to be a news reporter.
Speaker 1: It'll be my first jump back into print journalism really
Speaker 1: and truly in almost twenty years. So I'm excited about
Speaker 1: this opportunity to get back into my roots, something that
Speaker 1: I got away from for a long time, and it's
Speaker 1: very exciting. I appreciate my good friend Jim Sigelski for
Speaker 1: believing in me and giving me this opportunity. So I'm
Speaker 1: extremely excited about this new opportunity. So I will be
Speaker 1: once again. You are a conservative journalist if you're a
Speaker 1: longtime listener of the right Side Radio program. If you
Speaker 1: remember the early origins of the right Side Video Show,
Speaker 1: when it was myself and Chris McDaniel hosting the show,
Speaker 1: we had the tagline the only show where you'll find
Speaker 1: a conservative lawyer and a conservative journalist talking about the news. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm happy to say once again I'm back into journalism.
Speaker 1: So the conservative journalist moniker has returned. So that's just
Speaker 1: a small update there, and I'm looking forward to the
Speaker 1: challenge ahead and jumping back into this new career path
Speaker 1: and happily working for the Laurel Leader Call. They are
Speaker 1: Mississippi In my opinion, they are Mississippi's conservative newspaper. Yes,
Speaker 1: they're focused on our local area, but if you read
Speaker 1: the editorials, if you read the things out there, this
Speaker 1: is an unapologetically conservative newspaper. I couldn't be more proud
Speaker 1: to be joining that's team there, and am looking forward
Speaker 1: to again diving back into this line of work, back
Speaker 1: into this profession because, and I'll tell my listeners that
Speaker 1: part of the reason why I didn't pursue a career
Speaker 1: before now in print journalism is, in all honesty, I
Speaker 1: thought the medium was dying. I saw the writing on
Speaker 1: the wall. You had all these major corporations that were
Speaker 1: buying up small town newspapers and laying off longtime staff.
Speaker 1: I just didn't see a future there. But what I
Speaker 1: didn't understand, and what I didn't see at the time,
Speaker 1: was a vision that people like Jim Sigelski had local
Speaker 1: people who were willing to purchase the local newspaper or
Speaker 1: start their own newspapers and have a true family vibe,
Speaker 1: a true local, locally owned newspaper. So I couldn't be
Speaker 1: more excited to be joining the staff there at the
Speaker 1: Laurel Leader Call. And that's the only reason why I
Speaker 1: bring it up. So I really am excited about it.
Speaker 1: And if you've never checked out the Laurel Leader Call,
Speaker 1: if you're outside of our publishing area, you can always
Speaker 1: go to the Laurel Leader Call's website and check them
Speaker 1: out two days. So I am extremely excited to be
Speaker 1: joining the staff there, you know. Now, of course, let's
Speaker 1: get into the news of the day. We saw just
Speaker 1: the other day where Donald Trump dropped the bombshell that
Speaker 1: he had a plan, an idea of a US takeover
Speaker 1: of the Gaza Strip. This is a plan that he
Speaker 1: floated and came out and mentioned. Now. I have my
Speaker 1: own thoughts when it comes to the US owning the
Speaker 1: Gaza Strip, because, for one, I believe in the American
Speaker 1: first moniker, and I don't want to see US entangled
Speaker 1: over there in a mess that might involve my tax
Speaker 1: dollars going over there to rebuild the Godsa Strip. I
Speaker 1: don't want to see troops deployed over there to the
Speaker 1: Middle East, I just on its face, I'm not a
Speaker 1: fan of the idea. One of the things that I
Speaker 1: saw was that Senator ran Paul he pushed back against
Speaker 1: the idea, suggesting that the idea would portray the American
Speaker 1: First principle that Trump voters expect all said that the
Speaker 1: pursuit of peace should be that of Israel's and Israelis
Speaker 1: and Palestinians. I thought we voted for America First. We
Speaker 1: have no business contemplating yet another occupation to doom our
Speaker 1: treasury and spill our soldier's blood. The Senator made the
Speaker 1: comment in response to a post in which Secretary of
Speaker 1: State Marco Rubio declared on Tuesday that Gosam must be
Speaker 1: free from amas as At Potus shared today, the United
Speaker 1: States stands ready to lead and make Gozap beautiful again.
Speaker 1: Our pursuit is one of lasting peace. I tend to
Speaker 1: aside with Senator ran Paul. Now, the White House has
Speaker 1: since come out and they claim that this proposed takeover
Speaker 1: of the Gaza Strip will not cost the American taxpayers
Speaker 1: one dime. They said that they have no intention of
Speaker 1: sending troops there. So it's an interesting proposal, because again,
Speaker 1: if you're taking over the Gaza strip and trying to
Speaker 1: rebuild it. The question then comes, how do you do
Speaker 1: it without true American investment? How do you do this
Speaker 1: without boots on the ground in nation building? But they
Speaker 1: say that they do not see that happening, They do
Speaker 1: not want that that the President has not committed to
Speaker 1: putting boots on the ground in Gaza and reiterate that
Speaker 1: the President has no intention of paying for rebuilding Gaza.
Speaker 1: It since come out as well that this could just
Speaker 1: be a negotiation ploy, a tactic to try to get
Speaker 1: Israel and Hamas to the negotiation table to try to
Speaker 1: build the piece back up. We've seen Donald Trump in
Speaker 1: the last couple of days. Remember we were told of
Speaker 1: the pending trade war with Mexico and Canada, only to
Speaker 1: have them blink before the twenty five percent tariffs were
Speaker 1: ever put in place. So we've already seen that Trump
Speaker 1: has in his second term gone very gross, very aggressive
Speaker 1: with his negotiation tactics, and the first couple he's been
Speaker 1: very successful. I'm not sure how this plays out. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure how this leads to Israel and Hamas coming
Speaker 1: to a better understanding, But I will be clear on
Speaker 1: this as much as I support Donald Trump. In no way,
Speaker 1: shape or form do I support my tax dollars going
Speaker 1: overseas to rebuild Gaza. In no way, shape or form.
Speaker 1: Do I support our military going over to Gaza in
Speaker 1: forming another occupation. If it is an negotiation tactic, then
Speaker 1: we'll see how this works out. But I definitely agree
Speaker 1: more with rand Paul on this one, which isn't surprising.
Speaker 1: Ran Paul is one of the best we have there
Speaker 1: in the Senate, without a doubt, But I'm willing to
Speaker 1: reserve judgment until we see exactly how things play out.
Speaker 1: If this is a negotiation tactic and it is one
Speaker 1: that works, and we're able to get them to formulate
Speaker 1: some type of deal that leads to a more stable region,
Speaker 1: that leads to them on their own without US dollars
Speaker 1: rebuilding Gaza themselves, then I'm okay with using it as
Speaker 1: a negotiation tactic. But I just want to be clear
Speaker 1: that I see no way that the United States can
Speaker 1: take control of Gaza without and some type of occupation,
Speaker 1: because I don't understand how you enforce certain things over
Speaker 1: there in that region without a show of force. We've
Speaker 1: seen for a long time how unstable the Middle East
Speaker 1: is Peace in the Middle East is one of those
Speaker 1: objectives that many American president has sought out and most
Speaker 1: have failed. Trump and his strong arm tactics the way
Speaker 1: he negotiates, maybe maybe that will work. Maybe floating the
Speaker 1: idea of a US takeover is the correct path to
Speaker 1: getting them to fix things themselves. I don't know. I
Speaker 1: just want to be clear that when it comes down
Speaker 1: to my tax dollars going overseas for this endeavor, which
Speaker 1: again the White House says is not going to happen.
Speaker 1: They say there's not going to be an occupation, that
Speaker 1: we're not putting boots on the ground. So again I'm
Speaker 1: not sure how we own Goza in that sense. If
Speaker 1: it's a ploy to get them to come to these
Speaker 1: understandings and it works, then it'll be one of the
Speaker 1: greatest employees that we've seen. But I again, I'm just
Speaker 1: at my whole thing because again, anybody who's a longtime
Speaker 1: listener of this show understands that I'm one of those
Speaker 1: people that deals in logic and reason, and I don't
Speaker 1: see an path to ownership without investment. I don't see
Speaker 1: a path to ownership that does not cost us money.
Speaker 1: I don't see a path to ownership that does not
Speaker 1: include American troops on the ground there. Again, I want
Speaker 1: to hear more, because again, if they're saying that this
Speaker 1: is not the case, there was a person who is
Speaker 1: familiar with the President's thinking who was granted a nomination,
Speaker 1: was granted whose identity was kept secret so that way
Speaker 1: he could speak candidly. He said, and I quote, this
Speaker 1: was a get your ass to the negotiation table message.
Speaker 1: He compared it to Trump's threats of a trade war
Speaker 1: with America's neighbors and said it was just like the
Speaker 1: twenty five percent tariffs on Canada. Again, this is a
Speaker 1: very very interesting because according to White House Press Secretary
Speaker 1: Caroline Levette said that there's no written plan, So they
Speaker 1: don't have any written plan on the table. The real
Speaker 1: question is will this negotiation tactic work. Will a threat
Speaker 1: of a US takeover will that be enough to get
Speaker 1: both sides to figure out some way to fix things
Speaker 1: on their own. If we're already saying that there's no
Speaker 1: teeth in the thread, is there a real reason? Is
Speaker 1: there a real idea for them to fear that and
Speaker 1: actually go back to the negotiation table and come up
Speaker 1: with an answer. I don't know, again, the so called
Speaker 1: experts told us that Trump's twenty five percent tariff thread
Speaker 1: on Mexico and Canada was going to blow up in
Speaker 1: his face, that this was going to be a disaster
Speaker 1: for Americans in the American economy, that there was no
Speaker 1: way he would is going to win that battle. And
Speaker 1: yet before the tariffs ever even went into effect, Trump
Speaker 1: effectively won the battle. He hadn't won the war yet,
Speaker 1: because again, as you know, the tariffs have only been
Speaker 1: delayed for thirty days. They're more concessions that those two
Speaker 1: countries have to make before they're completely off the board.
Speaker 1: But I'm also not going to sit here and say
Speaker 1: that seeing Trump in his Art of the Deal type
Speaker 1: negotiations at work against Canadem Mexico, I'm not ready to
Speaker 1: completely discount the ability to make them fix things on
Speaker 1: their own. I just again, I don't see a path
Speaker 1: here to owning Gaza that doesn't lead to American taxpayers
Speaker 1: flipping the bill and American soldiers potentially spilling blood to
Speaker 1: try to make this happen. I hope that the White
Speaker 1: House saying that this is not going to be the case,
Speaker 1: that this is not an idea that will cost us
Speaker 1: a dime that this is not an idea that will
Speaker 1: involve in occupation, sending US troops over there. But and
Speaker 1: for now, I guess we just have to take that
Speaker 1: at face value because we don't know how this works.
Speaker 1: There's no written proposal by the White House's own admission.
Speaker 1: One thing I know for sure that we have already
Speaker 1: seen in the early days of the Trump administration is
Speaker 1: a stronger president, a stronger figurehead for our nation. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden would have never gotten those concession out of Canada
Speaker 1: and Mexico. Joe Biden would still be trying to turn
Speaker 1: a blind eye to the problem of illegal immigration in
Speaker 1: this country. We've seen a very aggressive administration in these
Speaker 1: early days, and they've been effective in the early days
Speaker 1: and things that we've seen, So why I don't support
Speaker 1: an idea of the United States owning Gaza if it's
Speaker 1: if it's an idea a threat that brings them back
Speaker 1: to the table where true negotiations will actually happen. We'll see,
Speaker 1: we'll see, But I just I don't know. But I
Speaker 1: also know not to underestimate the art of the deal
Speaker 1: type negotiations based on what we've already seen. But I
Speaker 1: don't think that we have to worry about the United
Speaker 1: States owning gods because I just don't see it as
Speaker 1: a feasible true option. Maybe a threat can be made
Speaker 1: that will ultimately gain the result that we all want
Speaker 1: to see. But the idea on its premise, I stand
Speaker 1: with Rand Paul on that one, because again, our idea,
Speaker 1: what we the American people voted for, was an American
Speaker 1: first idea. Far too long, this country has taken a
Speaker 1: back seat to our foreign neighbors, not just the ones
Speaker 1: closest to us, but overseas as well. We've constantly bended
Speaker 1: the knee to every foreign entity that wanted to push
Speaker 1: us around. One thing we can know for sure is
Speaker 1: Trump's not going to be that type of president. He's
Speaker 1: not going to bend the knee. He's going to stand
Speaker 1: up to these foreign leaders. He's going to push back.
Speaker 1: That's the type of leadership that we want. But the
Speaker 1: biggest thing that the American public wants first and foremost
Speaker 1: is America first policies. I think that's what he's going
Speaker 1: to deliver on this owning gaza idea aside I'm hoping
Speaker 1: that it is a negotiation tactic. I'm hoping that it
Speaker 1: is a successful negotiation tactic because I just don't see
Speaker 1: the path. I don't see the path without those investments
Speaker 1: that have already talked about. I just don't see a
Speaker 1: way that we'd be able to maintain an ownership without
Speaker 1: some show a force in the region who knows what
Speaker 1: they're thinking at the moment. If it gets them talking
Speaker 1: and it moves the negotiations in the right path, then
Speaker 1: it's then I'm fine with that. I'm fine with you
Speaker 1: putting out the idle threat, but I'm not going to
Speaker 1: be one of these that are cheerleading that idea when
Speaker 1: I don't see a feasible path for it. Here's the thing,
Speaker 1: and I want to be clear with people. It's okay
Speaker 1: to support Donald Trump, but you don't have to agree
Speaker 1: with everything. If you see something and you're got questions
Speaker 1: about it, or you just flat out don't like it,
Speaker 1: it's okay to say that you disagree. It's okay to
Speaker 1: say okay on this one. I don't know that I'm
Speaker 1: with you. I think we've fallen so far into the
Speaker 1: tribalistic camps where any one who might be critical of
Speaker 1: an idea or anything that's floated is labeled an enemy
Speaker 1: and I don't like that. I don't like the fact
Speaker 1: that there are folks out there that know full well
Speaker 1: that there are people like Rand Paul that are staunch
Speaker 1: conservatives and are always consistent, they always stand their ground.
Speaker 1: They're not just blind followers. They're out in the front lines.
Speaker 1: They're actually trying to lead the charge of conservatism. I
Speaker 1: don't like seeing folks try to be critical of Rand
Speaker 1: Paul because he point out an obvious objection. He pointed
Speaker 1: out an obvious question about us being America first. That
Speaker 1: doesn't make him anti Trump. That doesn't make him a
Speaker 1: problem for Donald Trump. That just makes him consistent with
Speaker 1: his values. That makes him consistent with his promises to
Speaker 1: the people that have voted for him. I have no
Speaker 1: problem with that. And I'll be clear right now that
Speaker 1: there may be some policies and there may be some
Speaker 1: ideas down the road the next four years that I
Speaker 1: disagree with, and I'm not going to shy away from
Speaker 1: saying I disagree with it just because it's floated from
Speaker 1: Donald Trump or Republicans. That's how we get into trouble
Speaker 1: is when we're not paying close enough attention because we
Speaker 1: are so ramped up in a personality, we're so ramped up. Look,
Speaker 1: I believe that Donald Trump's second term is going to
Speaker 1: be a good one. I think it's going to improve
Speaker 1: our country. But I'm also not naive enough to believe
Speaker 1: that I'm going to agree with every little thing that
Speaker 1: he comes up with. It's okay to disagree with him.
Speaker 1: It doesn't mean that you're anti Trump. But we're so
Speaker 1: wrapped up in these tribes. We're so wrapped up again.
Speaker 1: If you're listening to my conversation now, if you're listening
Speaker 1: to the things that are being said, in no way,
Speaker 1: shape or form, have I attacked the president. In no way,
Speaker 1: shape or form, have I ridiculed him. I'm just asking
Speaker 1: questions and stating a fact that I'm not a fan
Speaker 1: of a proposed ownership of Gaza. That doesn't make me
Speaker 1: anti Trump, because at the same time, I already acknowledged
Speaker 1: that he was successful in using the threat of twenty
Speaker 1: five percent tariffs to get Canada and Mexico to cave,
Speaker 1: So we know that he has a good negotiation tactic.
Speaker 1: So that could be all this is. But I don't
Speaker 1: want to fall into that trap of the hero worship,
Speaker 1: even of a Donald Trump, because that's how you get
Speaker 1: yourself in trouble. I live in a state, in the
Speaker 1: state of Mississippi that is has a Republican governor an
Speaker 1: alleged Republican lieutenant governor. Every major office in the state
Speaker 1: is held by Republicans. The Senate is allegedly controlled by Republicans,
Speaker 1: the House is allegedly controlled by Republicans. The party controls
Speaker 1: those apparatuses based on the sheer number of alleged Republicans elected.
Speaker 1: But I also live in a state that currently has
Speaker 1: two bills pending designed to protect billionaire pesticide manufacturers and
Speaker 1: sellers from liability when they cause harm to innocent Mississippians.
Speaker 1: These bills, if they become law, and I'm reading directly
Speaker 1: off of a post from Senator Chris McDaniel that says
Speaker 1: that first, these two things will happen. First, farmers, workers,
Speaker 1: and consumers lose their right to sue if pestified harm
Speaker 1: if pesticides harm them or their land. Second, children and
Speaker 1: families exposed to harmful pestified sides sprayed near home, schools,
Speaker 1: or playgrounds would have no recourse if they get sick.
Speaker 1: These two Senate bills, or I mean these two bills
Speaker 1: are Senate Bill twenty four to seventy two and House
Speaker 1: Bill twelve twenty one, and they're bad bills in my state.
Speaker 1: And these are two apparatuses that are controlled by alleged Republicans.
Speaker 1: These bills are a perfect example of why we can't
Speaker 1: just turn a blind eye because we've got Republican leadership
Speaker 1: in office. These two bills are perfect examples of how
Speaker 1: if you're not paying attention to what they're doing. And
Speaker 1: let's rest assured that a pestified side bill is not
Speaker 1: one that most people are going to pay attention to,
Speaker 1: but it has far reaching problems for you. It's probably
Speaker 1: is a bill. You should be paying very close attention
Speaker 1: to these two bills, and if you live in the
Speaker 1: state of Mississippi, I strongly encourage you to blow up
Speaker 1: the switchboards and tell them to vote Noah on these
Speaker 1: two bills because they're disastrous and they're not designed to
Speaker 1: help the people. Lobbyist money is a real thing, and
Speaker 1: a lot of these politicians don't care what you think
Speaker 1: because you're not able to donate as much money as
Speaker 1: that big wig that is asking them to alter these bills.
Speaker 1: It's a perfect and the reason I use these as
Speaker 1: an example. I'm not saying that Donald Trump is going
Speaker 1: down that path, because I don't believe that he is,
Speaker 1: but I do believe that Republicans will because they are
Speaker 1: in my state. I do believe that some of the
Speaker 1: Republicans who have wrapped themselves up in Donald Trump, who
Speaker 1: don't believe in the Trump agenda, but they'll pretend they
Speaker 1: do just so that way you'll fall for them and
Speaker 1: fall for whatever they try to push forward. I believe
Speaker 1: that those type of Republicans are out there, and I
Speaker 1: believe that as long as we are following into this
Speaker 1: tramp of tribalism, that we set ourselves up for seeing
Speaker 1: bad bills like this becoming law. We set ourselves up
Speaker 1: for bad legislation like this to move forward and advance.
Speaker 1: The threat is not just there in Washington. The threats
Speaker 1: right there in your home states, the threats right there
Speaker 1: where you live in your state capital. It's own us
Speaker 1: to make sure that we stay protected. And we can't
Speaker 1: just sit back and accept because we have Republican leadership
Speaker 1: that everything they do is right. We can't sit back
Speaker 1: and accept just because we like a strong personality that
Speaker 1: we have to agree with everything they put forth because
Speaker 1: sometimes they're going to be wrong, and it is okay
Speaker 1: to disagree with them, no matter how much you like
Speaker 1: them on particular issues, because when you see bad bills
Speaker 1: like that, then you understand the possibilities are out there.
Speaker 1: And that's the whole point of the opening of tonight's shows.
Speaker 1: I just want you to think. I want you to
Speaker 1: be critical in your thinking. Don't get wrapped up in
Speaker 1: a personality. Don't get rapped up in Republican is right,
Speaker 1: because they're not always right. A lot of times they're
Speaker 1: one hundred percent wrong because lobbyists have their hands in
Speaker 1: their pockets, and even with a strong leader like a
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, bad legislation may get through and it may
Speaker 1: not even be anything he's champion, but it got past
Speaker 1: them somehow. Maybe he just didn't understand what it was,
Speaker 1: or whatever the case. So the point here is that
Speaker 1: it's okay the voice your concerned, your opposition to an idea,
Speaker 1: to a bill, whatever it is. It doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: the party that you may vote for more regularly than
Speaker 1: not is the one behind bad pieces of legislation or
Speaker 1: bad ideas. You shouldn't be afraid to call it out.
Speaker 1: You should be perfectly Okay to push forth your opinion
Speaker 1: that it might be a bad idea, this whole Gaza
Speaker 1: ownership thing. I'm willing to accept that as a negotiation tactic,
Speaker 1: because I, for one don't think that Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: naive enough to believe that we can take ownership of
Speaker 1: Gaza without spending money, without putting boots on the ground.
Speaker 1: But I think that he is just trying once again
Speaker 1: to strong arm these foreign leaders into doing what's right,
Speaker 1: doing what needs to happen, and figure out a way
Speaker 1: to get back to the negotiation tables with one another.
Speaker 1: We'll see how this plays out. But again I'll be clear,
Speaker 1: I don't support a United States ownership of Gaza merely
Speaker 1: because I just don't see a path to do it
Speaker 1: that doesn't cost us. This is the right Side Radio program.
Speaker 1: We're going to pause right here for a quick commercial break.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back. The Midnight Ride the home of
Speaker 1: the anti establishment movement. This network features great programming such
Speaker 1: as Chris McDaniel's America, God and Country, The Right Side
Speaker 1: Radio Show, Paul Revere's Liberty Layer, and many more coming soon.
Speaker 1: So check out the Midnight Ride today. Head to the
Speaker 1: Midnight Ride dot com and check out all the content.
Speaker 1: All right, guys, welcome back to the Right Side radio program.
Speaker 1: We're gonna switch gears and talk about a little bit
Speaker 1: more news here, because sir Corey Booker is in the
Speaker 1: news again. He spoke at a rally outside of the
Speaker 1: Capitol Building in Washington on Wednesday in protest of Elon
Speaker 1: musk sweep of the US Agency for International Development. He
Speaker 1: said that we will fight their violation of civil service laws.
Speaker 1: We will fight their violation of civil rights laws. We
Speaker 1: will fight their violation of separation of powers. We will
Speaker 1: fight their violation of our constitution of the United States
Speaker 1: of America. We will not shut up, we will stick up,
Speaker 1: we will rise up. Of course, this is because Trump
Speaker 1: does not like the fact that they are putting cuts
Speaker 1: to the agency funding controversial programs which, according to the
Speaker 1: White House, gave one point five million to advance diversity
Speaker 1: equity inclusion in Siberia's workplaces and businesses. So again, Corey
Speaker 1: Booker is concerned that we're not spending money in foreign country,
Speaker 1: is trying to force DEEI policies on them. First off,
Speaker 1: let me be clear here, mister Booker, because it is
Speaker 1: none of the United States business what these foreign nations
Speaker 1: do as far as their government, and we shouldn't spend
Speaker 1: a single dollar trying to push this garbage in our
Speaker 1: own country, let alone in foreign nations. It's insane when
Speaker 1: you watch it because you see that you've got Corey
Speaker 1: Booker being angry about the fact that American tax dollars
Speaker 1: are being spent on issues in foreign countries. Corey Booker
Speaker 1: would rather millions of dollars go to these foreign nations
Speaker 1: just so we can push this ridiculous DEI narrative. He
Speaker 1: talks about standing up for the US Constitution in his
Speaker 1: statement there that I read you, how is it standing
Speaker 1: up for the US Constitution when we're cutting pointless programs.
Speaker 1: It's insane to me because again he's having a meltdown.
Speaker 1: He's having a meltdown because American tax dollars aren't going
Speaker 1: to wasteful projects in foreign nations. Look, I can tell
Speaker 1: you right now they don't care what we think, and
Speaker 1: I can promise you this too. They're probably taking that
Speaker 1: tax dollars that is meant to go to push your
Speaker 1: precious DEI narrative, and they're probably spinning it wherever they want.
Speaker 1: This is actually a good thing to see that Elon
Speaker 1: Musk and his new group is finding wasteful spenditures like this,
Speaker 1: and we're seeing cuts made at the suggestion of it.
Speaker 1: You can lay out whatever attacks you want, but it's
Speaker 1: nothing more than grand standing, grand standing for your own
Speaker 1: pet projects. It's grand standing for the sake of grand standing. Again,
Speaker 1: this is Democrat playbook one oh one, Divide and conquer.
Speaker 1: If they can make this seem even though this is
Speaker 1: intended for nations outside of the United States of America,
Speaker 1: but he's going to make this sound like that this
Speaker 1: is somehow harming Americans. Of course, Corey Booker wants the
Speaker 1: initiatives to be pushed throughout the United States of America.
Speaker 1: That is who he is, that's what he believes. He
Speaker 1: is definitely not America first. He is part of the
Speaker 1: group that would love to see America be shamed. He
Speaker 1: is part of the group that would love to see
Speaker 1: America take a back seat, because again, we've been so
Speaker 1: bad for so long. Cory Booker is a clown. He's
Speaker 1: somebody that we have known for a long time. He's
Speaker 1: a clown, and he just continues to show it. The
Speaker 1: attacks on Elon Musk and the Doge group have intensified,
Speaker 1: and the real question is why are they so scared again?
Speaker 1: The folks that are opposing Elon Musk and this new
Speaker 1: government agency are the same folks who thought we needed
Speaker 1: to spend way more money on him, invested in more
Speaker 1: ires agents. Instead of trying to figure out a way
Speaker 1: to make sure that Americans got more of their own
Speaker 1: hard earned money back, we were wanting to try to
Speaker 1: figure out a way to punish Americans so that way
Speaker 1: we can send money to these foreign nations for nonsense
Speaker 1: like this. Enough is enough, people. Thank god Donald Trump
Speaker 1: won in November because this type of stuff can be exposed.
Speaker 1: And this further proves the disconnect that the Democrats have
Speaker 1: with the American voters. They have yet to understand that
Speaker 1: these very initiatives that Corey Booker is trying to fight
Speaker 1: for so hard, these very initiatives, they're the ones that
Speaker 1: have led to their defeats. These very initiatives that Corey
Speaker 1: Hooker wants to get up there and give his grand
Speaker 1: standing speech before a group of knuckleheaded protesters. They're the
Speaker 1: ones who don't understand that these type of things are
Speaker 1: the reason why they lost these elections. They're not living
Speaker 1: in the real world. They're not living in reality, and
Speaker 1: they don't care to live in reality because as far
Speaker 1: as they're concern they're on the right side of the issue.
Speaker 1: They've yet to get why they lost last year. They
Speaker 1: don't see the tea leaves that were thrown right before
Speaker 1: their feet. They still think that these are the issues
Speaker 1: that will win them elections, and I can assure you
Speaker 1: they're not. I can assure you that those are the
Speaker 1: reasons why these type of idiot a grand standing things.
Speaker 1: If you listen to the latest morning Coffee that I
Speaker 1: put out this morning, or if you're listening to this
Speaker 1: on Thursday. On Wednesday morning, I talked about Chuck Schumer
Speaker 1: in his silly grandstanding of his own, where Chuck Schumer
Speaker 1: was trying to attack the tear twenty five percent tariffs
Speaker 1: that Trump threatened to put on Canada and Mexico. Of
Speaker 1: course he did this before they both blinked, but in
Speaker 1: it he stood up there and held up a Corona
Speaker 1: beer and a avocado and talking about how this was
Speaker 1: going to affect your beer and your quack. Instead of
Speaker 1: saying guacamole, you know, he wanted to be hip too
Speaker 1: and say quawk, although if you just watched the video,
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer is anything but hip. But it just continues
Speaker 1: to show how completely disconnected Democrats truly are. They don't
Speaker 1: want to argue issues, they want to push agendas. And
Speaker 1: that's part of the problem. Until we can get back
Speaker 1: to actually debating issues at hand. When all we're doing
Speaker 1: is grand standing and pointing out or trying to push
Speaker 1: an agenda, we're not getting anywhere. But Democrats love to
Speaker 1: divide and conquer. That has always been their mindset. Why
Speaker 1: do you think they always flocked to whatever the newest
Speaker 1: group that they can label the newest minority group. Rest assured.
Speaker 1: Democrats don't care about the alphabet mafia. They don't care
Speaker 1: about the transgender community. They only see them as a
Speaker 1: group that they can exploit, a group that they can
Speaker 1: marginalize and turn into a voting block for them. But
Speaker 1: what they don't understand is they're more Americans that disagree
Speaker 1: with these agendas that they continue to try to push.
Speaker 1: They're more Americans that disagree with them. And we saw
Speaker 1: that last year because they stood up to them. They
Speaker 1: stood up to them, and they voted out their president.
Speaker 1: They voted the control of the Senate out of the
Speaker 1: Democrats' hands. They made sure that Republicans maintain control of
Speaker 1: the House. This happened because what you're selling the American public,
Speaker 1: we're not buying. Hopefully they never fully understand that, because
Speaker 1: if they figure it out and start to try to
Speaker 1: pretend they're not for it, and they get back in power,
Speaker 1: they're only going to push those agendas once again. Because
Speaker 1: I don't believe that they've learned a lesson. I believe
Speaker 1: if they drop them, which right now they've consistently not
Speaker 1: dropped them. Before we go to the break too, I
Speaker 1: want to talk about our good friend AOC there in
Speaker 1: New York because she also wanted to take a shot
Speaker 1: at Elon Musk, where she said that he is one
Speaker 1: of the most unintelligent billionaires she has ever seen. AOC,
Speaker 1: who are you to talk about anyone's intelligence. I've watched
Speaker 1: you speak, I've listened to the nonsense that comes out
Speaker 1: of your mouth, and I can say this, not only
Speaker 1: are you one of the most unintelligent people in the
Speaker 1: halls of Congress I've ever seen, you're just flat out stupid.
Speaker 1: If you want to sit there and attack the intelligence
Speaker 1: of Elon Musk, that speaks volumes about how stupid you are.
Speaker 1: But again that goes back to how much they fear
Speaker 1: what he's finding. She doesn't care much like Corey Bucker Booker.
Speaker 1: She doesn't care about wasting yours or minds tax dollars.
Speaker 1: She doesn't care about that. She's all just like Booker,
Speaker 1: just like Schumer, she is merely someone who is up
Speaker 1: there pushing agenda. She's not arguing issues. She's arguing agenda.
Speaker 1: And that's the problem, and that's why they will continue
Speaker 1: to lose. Look, I have no problem with Democrats losing.
Speaker 1: I quite enjoy it. I just wish the Republican Party
Speaker 1: was a little bit stronger. I wish the Republican Party
Speaker 1: would follow through with some of their campaign promises. I
Speaker 1: believe Donald Trump is going to try to follow through
Speaker 1: this campaign promises, but I'm still very skeptical of those
Speaker 1: weak kneed Rhinos in the House and the Senate because
Speaker 1: I see example after example of their failures and them
Speaker 1: not understanding this is the right Side Radio program. We'll
Speaker 1: be right back. Hey everyone, this is Jack Fairshald' so
Speaker 1: the Right Side Radio Program and license reviewed, and I
Speaker 1: want to talk to you for a second about my pillow.
Speaker 1: My pillow is quite simply the finest pillow on the market.
Speaker 1: My Pillow's patent at interlocking fills adjust to your individual
Speaker 1: sleep needs regardless of sleeping position. This innovative fill then
Speaker 1: holds that position all night, helping you fall asleep faster,
Speaker 1: stay asleep longer. The founder and owner of Mine Pillow,
Speaker 1: Mike Lindell, personally guarantees that My Pillow will be the
Speaker 1: most comfortable pillow you'll ever own, and I'll add my
Speaker 1: own guarantee as well. And right now you can get
Speaker 1: up to eighty percent off of all My Pillow products,
Speaker 1: including bed sheets, slippers, towels, down comforters, mattress toppers, even
Speaker 1: coffee when you go to MyPillow dot com and enter
Speaker 1: the special promo code Midnight Ride no space in between
Speaker 1: midnight and ride and remember enter the promo code m
Speaker 1: d Night r Ide and say big while getting the
Speaker 1: best night's sleep you've ever had. All right, guys, here,
Speaker 1: welcome back to the Right Side Radio program. Here we
Speaker 1: are on the home stretch of the radio show, the
Speaker 1: final segment of the program today. And if you've been
Speaker 1: listening to the shows lately, one of the things I've
Speaker 1: been very critical of is how long politicians stay in office.
Speaker 1: The fact that we have politicians that effectively die of
Speaker 1: old age while they're still in office is a problem
Speaker 1: in our country. We can never get an influx of
Speaker 1: new ideas when we're constantly electing the same people over
Speaker 1: and over again. We can never move the needle in
Speaker 1: a better direction. If we look up there and all
Speaker 1: we see in the halls of Congress in the Senate
Speaker 1: chambers are fossils. It's a problem. It's something we have seen.
Speaker 1: And another example of that is news coming out today
Speaker 1: that Mitch McConnell was escorted out of the Capitol in
Speaker 1: a wheelchair today after the eighty two year old senator
Speaker 1: filled twice in short secession. One of McConnell's falls occurred
Speaker 1: out on stairs outside the Senate chamber, causing panic looks
Speaker 1: to flash across his congressional staff and security detail. A
Speaker 1: group which include his Republican colleagues, reportedly rushed to surround
Speaker 1: McConnell and help him back to his feet, who was
Speaker 1: able to walk on his own to a Senate lunch,
Speaker 1: but he fell again during the lunch meeting. Look, I
Speaker 1: don't want to kid myself Anybody who's a listener of
Speaker 1: this program knows that I'm not a Mitch McConnell fan,
Speaker 1: But I don't want to see it will happen to
Speaker 1: him either. But I will call him out because he
Speaker 1: shouldn't still be in the Senate. He's eighty two years old.
Speaker 1: It's been pastime for him to go. He just gave
Speaker 1: up his leadership, yet he's going to serve out his term.
Speaker 1: If his health holds up for him, that would be
Speaker 1: a big if. At this point, he's not alone, as
Speaker 1: you know, because you've got oldest dark Nancy Pelosi over
Speaker 1: on the House side. You've got other fossils that are
Speaker 1: continuing to be in the Senate in the House. This
Speaker 1: is nothing new, but it is a problem, and it's
Speaker 1: not what the founders intended. The founders never intended for
Speaker 1: people to go to Washington and stay there to make
Speaker 1: it their careers. The idea of term limits, we've talked
Speaker 1: about that, and we understand that that's probably a pipe
Speaker 1: dream because the power brokers don't want to give it away.
Speaker 1: But can we at least institute an age cap. You
Speaker 1: hit seventy five years old, you have to step down.
Speaker 1: You can't well you can serve out your term, but
Speaker 1: after after you hit seventy five, you can't run again.
Speaker 1: Can we can we do something like that? We have
Speaker 1: age requirements, you have to hit a certain age before
Speaker 1: you can run for certain offices. Why can't we do
Speaker 1: the same for the halls of Congress. Why can't we
Speaker 1: do the same for senators and congress people. Why can't
Speaker 1: we do the same for them? But flip it and
Speaker 1: put it age where you have to. You have to
Speaker 1: stop running for office. McConnell. Despite my differences with him,
Speaker 1: despite the fact that I am if I lived in
Speaker 1: this state, there's no way in hell i'd ever vote
Speaker 1: for Mitch McConnell. I'm not going to wish ill on him,
Speaker 1: even though I think he's been terrible and a problem
Speaker 1: for our country. He is the face of the Republican establishment,
Speaker 1: without a doubt, But he's also the face of everything
Speaker 1: that is wrong with our current political system. The fact
Speaker 1: that the elite political class go up there and stay
Speaker 1: up there until they die is a problem. We don't
Speaker 1: elect people to be our rulers. That's one of the
Speaker 1: biggest things I cringe from whenever I hear somebody say
Speaker 1: refer to someone in the Senate, someone in the House
Speaker 1: as our leaders. They're not our leaders. People, there are representatives. Sadly,
Speaker 1: we've seen time and time again that the American electorate
Speaker 1: is not smart enough to vote people out. They will
Speaker 1: fall for the trap and the big spending money that
Speaker 1: incumbents have, and they will stay in office as long
Speaker 1: as they want to in most cases. But at some point,
Speaker 1: at some point, we have to think about what's right.
Speaker 1: And this looks like elderly abuse. The fact that the
Speaker 1: man can't even stay on his feet and is having
Speaker 1: trouble and had to be wheeled out in a wheelchair,
Speaker 1: that's not a good look for anybody. McConnell should just
Speaker 1: go ahead and resign. My prediction is he will resign
Speaker 1: before his term is up because that's the easiest way
Speaker 1: for the establishment to maintain control of the seat, because
Speaker 1: whoever they appoint then gets the power of incumbency when
Speaker 1: they actually have to run for that seat. It's a
Speaker 1: time tested, true tradition that law standing politicians, if they
Speaker 1: do leave office before death, they normally resign before their
Speaker 1: term is up, and that protects the seat for the establishment.
Speaker 1: That's part of the reason why we constantly see the
Speaker 1: establishment win. That's part of the reason why we constantly
Speaker 1: see the establishment maintain its power. It would be nice
Speaker 1: if we had an age limit on the top side,
Speaker 1: that once you hit seventy five years old, you're ineligible
Speaker 1: of running again. That could solve some of our problems.
Speaker 1: Maybe even make it young whatever you want. You want
Speaker 1: it to be seventy, I'm fine with that. But at
Speaker 1: some point, at some point, if we want to get
Speaker 1: away from constantly having fossils who fall asleep hot theory
Speaker 1: up there allegedly representing you, If we want to get
Speaker 1: away from that, it'll never pass. That's a pipe dream.
Speaker 1: I understand that, because again, these fossils, they don't want
Speaker 1: to give up power. There's a reason they don't just
Speaker 1: go ahead and leave on their own in most instances.
Speaker 1: But man, it makes sense, doesn't It would make perfect
Speaker 1: sense to just put a age cap on them, where, hey,
Speaker 1: you hit this age, you can't run again. I would
Speaker 1: be for it. I think most Americans, if they were
Speaker 1: honest with themselves and they actually looked at stuff with
Speaker 1: logic reason, they would be for it as well. Switching
Speaker 1: gears in the final story before we wrap up this
Speaker 1: episode of the right Side radio program. The NCAA now
Speaker 1: has respond to President Donald Trump's executive order to keep
Speaker 1: biological men out of women's sports. Of course, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump signed the No Men in Women's Sports Executive Order.
Speaker 1: NCAA President Charlie Baker responded to the executive order in
Speaker 1: a statement, saying it provided a clear national standard. Baker
Speaker 1: said that the NCAA Board of Governors would review it
Speaker 1: and take steps to align with the organization's policies in
Speaker 1: the upcoming days. Their statement said that the NCAA is
Speaker 1: an organization made up of one thousand, one hundred colleges
Speaker 1: and universities in all fifty states that collectively enroll more
Speaker 1: than five hundred thirty thousand student athletes. We strongly believe
Speaker 1: that clear, consistent, and uniform eligibility standards would best serve
Speaker 1: today's student athletes instead of a patchwork of conflicting state
Speaker 1: laws and court decisions. To that end, President Trump's executive
Speaker 1: order provides a clear national standard. The NCAA Board of
Speaker 1: Governors is reviewing the executive order and will take necessary
Speaker 1: steps to align the NCAA policy in the coming days,
Speaker 1: subject to further guidance from the administration. The Association will
Speaker 1: continue to help foster welcoming environments on campuses for all
Speaker 1: student athletes. We stand ready to assist schools as they
Speaker 1: look for ways to support any student athlete affected by
Speaker 1: changes in the policy. The NCAA is already getting ready
Speaker 1: to bend a knee because the guidelines are there. It's
Speaker 1: sad that something like that was ever even necessary. It
Speaker 1: was sad that we have to say that men have
Speaker 1: no place in women's sports. But we've gotten to that
Speaker 1: point because insane radical liberals have come in and as
Speaker 1: I talked about in the segment before, democrats finding a
Speaker 1: group that they can segment, a group that they can
Speaker 1: push a certain narrative towards to pretend that they are
Speaker 1: there for them, a new part of the victim class.
Speaker 1: That's something that democrats find very important. They love creating
Speaker 1: a new group in the victim class. And that's the
Speaker 1: only thing reason why they ever even pushed this trans
Speaker 1: nonsense upon us. You know, they were the ones who
Speaker 1: for years claim to be the champions of women, yet
Speaker 1: they've actively worked hard to take opportunities away from little
Speaker 1: girls and women across this country with this nonsense. The
Speaker 1: NCAA already taking the steps to abide by the executive
Speaker 1: order is a positive step. Make no mistake. I'm not
Speaker 1: always the biggest fan of executive orders. I've been clear
Speaker 1: on that for a long time. But in this instance,
Speaker 1: I'm happy to see that your little girl won't be
Speaker 1: denied an opportunity to play sports because there's some boy
Speaker 1: who is confused, and because we are encouraging the live
Speaker 1: your truth nonsense, he's allowed to take her spot on
Speaker 1: the girls team. Knowing that that might go away is
Speaker 1: a good thing in my mind. Of course, I'm sure
Speaker 1: are Booker, Chucky Schumer, and AOC you will be at
Speaker 1: a rally somewhere to protest protecting women in sports, because
Speaker 1: that's what they do. They're insane people, as I've said repeatedly,
Speaker 1: and we've seen evidence. As I close out this show,
Speaker 1: just if there's anything you can take away from tonight,
Speaker 1: just remember there's going to be times in the next
Speaker 1: four years where you may see something with the Trump
Speaker 1: administration pushes that you don't agree with. That doesn't make
Speaker 1: you less of a conservative, that doesn't make you less
Speaker 1: of a patriot, that doesn't make you less of a
Speaker 1: Donald Trump supporter. That just makes you human. That makes
Speaker 1: you honest, because I can tell you this, They're always
Speaker 1: going to be disagreements. If you're married, you underst that
Speaker 1: you and your wife probably disagree on sixty five percent
Speaker 1: of things, but you still make your union work. And
Speaker 1: it's the same principle here. I hope that people understand
Speaker 1: that message. And we're not going to label folks like
Speaker 1: Grand Paul or myself who are critical of one idea
Speaker 1: as someone who is anti Trump, because that couldn't be
Speaker 1: further from the truth. We'll see. I just am not
Speaker 1: a fan of the tribalism no matter which way the
Speaker 1: wind is flong. This has been the right Side Radio program.
Speaker 1: Thank y'all so much for listening. We'll see you again.
Speaker 1: Real Sick. It's Gay River Resort, The Midnight Ride, the
Speaker 1: home of the anti establishment movement. This network features great
Speaker 1: programming such as Chris McDaniel's America, God and Country, The
Speaker 1: right Side Radio Show, Paul Revere's Liberty Layer, and many
Speaker 1: more coming soon. So check out The Midnight Ride today.
Speaker 1: Head to the Midnight Ride dot com and check out
Speaker 1: all the amazing content