WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.640 --> 00:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>In today's episode, we look at why farmers in Rajasthan

2
00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:07.759
<v Speaker 1>are challenging the GI tags granted to Unja Jira and

3
00:00:07.919 --> 00:00:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Unja Fenel. We also talk about a proposed railway expansion

4
00:00:12.439 --> 00:00:16.399
<v Speaker 1>through the Sathpuda mail Card Tiger landscape, where questions remain

5
00:00:16.519 --> 00:00:20.359
<v Speaker 1>over its impact on a crucial wildlife corridor. But first

6
00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>we talk about India's decision to keep the Indus Waters

7
00:00:24.120 --> 00:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Treaty with Pakistan on hold and how that has moved

8
00:00:27.679 --> 00:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the world's most important water sharing agreements into

9
00:00:31.480 --> 00:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>one of its most uncertain phases. Hi am Atchasharma and

10
00:00:39.039 --> 00:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to three Things the Indian Express new show.

11
00:00:47.359 --> 00:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>The Indus Water Treaty, signed in nineteen sixty has often

12
00:00:51.240 --> 00:00:55.159
<v Speaker 1>been described as a rare success in India Pakistan relations

13
00:00:55.479 --> 00:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>because it has survived repeated conflicts. But India is now

14
00:00:59.719 --> 00:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>our that the pact can no longer be treated as

15
00:01:03.320 --> 00:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a static arrangement because the ground realities have changed sharply.

16
00:01:09.040 --> 00:01:14.319
<v Speaker 2>So India has put the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance,

17
00:01:14.760 --> 00:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>which basically means that India says that we are no

18
00:01:19.920 --> 00:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>longer bound by the provisions of this treaty and this

19
00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:27.359
<v Speaker 2>happened after the Pehlgam terrorist attack last year.

20
00:01:28.599 --> 00:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the Indian Express is Amatav Senha who reports on environment,

21
00:01:32.359 --> 00:01:34.159
<v Speaker 1>climate change and water for the.

22
00:01:34.079 --> 00:01:38.599
<v Speaker 2>Newspaper, and even before that, and our listeners would probably

23
00:01:38.599 --> 00:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>remember that a similar sort of a situation had arisen

24
00:01:42.760 --> 00:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>in twenty sixteen after the terrorist attack in Uri, and

25
00:01:47.560 --> 00:01:51.319
<v Speaker 2>at that time Prime Minister and Aranromodi had made that

26
00:01:51.439 --> 00:01:56.719
<v Speaker 2>famous statement saying kun or panisatsat nehibehengi, no blood and

27
00:01:56.799 --> 00:02:01.879
<v Speaker 2>water cannot flow together. So that twenty sixteen is actually

28
00:02:02.159 --> 00:02:06.879
<v Speaker 2>the start of the present sort of imbroglio that we

29
00:02:07.000 --> 00:02:10.840
<v Speaker 2>see on Indus Waters Treaty, which has continued till now.

30
00:02:11.120 --> 00:02:14.879
<v Speaker 2>So it's been ten years now that twenty sixteen event

31
00:02:14.919 --> 00:02:19.360
<v Speaker 2>had happened and India had decided to use Indus Waters

32
00:02:19.400 --> 00:02:23.199
<v Speaker 2>Treaty as some sort of leverage, which we had not

33
00:02:23.520 --> 00:02:24.599
<v Speaker 2>done earlier.

34
00:02:25.800 --> 00:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Now that's central to understanding why this treaty lasted as

35
00:02:29.919 --> 00:02:30.759
<v Speaker 1>long as it did.

36
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:35.879
<v Speaker 2>One of the main reasons why it has survived so

37
00:02:36.039 --> 00:02:40.120
<v Speaker 2>long is the fact that under the treaty, because India

38
00:02:40.159 --> 00:02:43.680
<v Speaker 2>is the upper Ryparian state, most of the obligations and

39
00:02:43.719 --> 00:02:48.319
<v Speaker 2>the responsibilities are on India and not on Pakistan. So

40
00:02:48.680 --> 00:02:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it was India's responsibility to allow the waters to flow,

41
00:02:52.960 --> 00:02:56.759
<v Speaker 2>not to disrupt the flow, not to change the floor,

42
00:02:56.840 --> 00:03:00.520
<v Speaker 2>not to do anything which sort of is errupts the

43
00:03:00.599 --> 00:03:02.080
<v Speaker 2>flow down to Pakistan.

44
00:03:02.120 --> 00:03:03.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's natural.

45
00:03:03.159 --> 00:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>That would always be the responsibility of the Upper Riparian state.

46
00:03:07.560 --> 00:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>So the main reason why the treaty has continued for

47
00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:15.919
<v Speaker 2>so long and it's been a success is the fact

48
00:03:15.919 --> 00:03:20.039
<v Speaker 2>that India actually abided by the provisions of the treaty

49
00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:24.719
<v Speaker 2>in good faith despite the provocations from Pakistan. And this

50
00:03:25.000 --> 00:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>is not very well appreciated when this point is made

51
00:03:29.520 --> 00:03:33.719
<v Speaker 2>that the treaty has survived wars and tensions and terrorist attacks.

52
00:03:33.960 --> 00:03:38.159
<v Speaker 2>It has survived because India continued to abide by the

53
00:03:38.159 --> 00:03:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Indus Waters Treaty and did not disrupt it at any

54
00:03:42.840 --> 00:03:47.360
<v Speaker 2>point of time, despite all the provocations that happened from

55
00:03:47.400 --> 00:03:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Pakistani side regarding terrorist attacks and wars.

56
00:03:52.080 --> 00:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Amatap says that the treaty divides the Indus Basin rivers

57
00:03:55.759 --> 00:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in an unusual way. The western rivers Indus Jalam Chaina

58
00:04:00.360 --> 00:04:03.759
<v Speaker 1>are for Pakistan's use. India has to let their waters

59
00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:06.719
<v Speaker 1>flow into Pakistan, though it can use some of the

60
00:04:06.759 --> 00:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>water for irrigation and hydro power under certain conditions. On

61
00:04:11.159 --> 00:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, the eastern rivers, the sutlerge Brs and

62
00:04:15.520 --> 00:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Ravi are allocated to India, though Pakistan can use whatever

63
00:04:20.120 --> 00:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>water from these rivers that flows into its territory. This

64
00:04:23.439 --> 00:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>structure is also why the treaty has been described by

65
00:04:26.639 --> 00:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>experts not as a normal sharing arrangement. Because most water

66
00:04:31.079 --> 00:04:35.879
<v Speaker 1>sharing treaties allocate volumes or percentages of flow. The Indus

67
00:04:35.959 --> 00:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Waters Treaty assigns entire rivers to one side or the other.

68
00:04:40.319 --> 00:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So the Indian argument now is that this model is

69
00:04:43.680 --> 00:04:45.879
<v Speaker 1>too rigid for the present moment.

70
00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:51.199
<v Speaker 2>Because there are official reasons and there are the actual

71
00:04:51.279 --> 00:04:54.560
<v Speaker 2>reasons behind it. The official reason, of course India says

72
00:04:54.600 --> 00:04:58.120
<v Speaker 2>that the ground situation has changed and there is a

73
00:04:58.120 --> 00:05:00.959
<v Speaker 2>lot of truth in it, and there have been recent

74
00:05:01.360 --> 00:05:04.399
<v Speaker 2>studies as well which point out to the fact that

75
00:05:04.800 --> 00:05:08.199
<v Speaker 2>the situation is drastically different from what it was in

76
00:05:08.360 --> 00:05:12.680
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen fifties and nineteen sixties and the conditions under

77
00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>which the treaty was negotiated and finalized. That situation no

78
00:05:16.839 --> 00:05:20.759
<v Speaker 2>longer exists and we are talking not in security terms

79
00:05:21.199 --> 00:05:24.639
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of water demand, in terms of the

80
00:05:24.759 --> 00:05:28.480
<v Speaker 2>number of people who are dependent on this water, in

81
00:05:28.600 --> 00:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>terms of the climate change, in terms of new uses

82
00:05:33.639 --> 00:05:38.439
<v Speaker 2>of water coming up, so the ground situation has changed completely.

83
00:05:38.680 --> 00:05:43.279
<v Speaker 2>And India's point is that look, sixty sixty five years

84
00:05:43.480 --> 00:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>is a long time to review a water sharing arrangement

85
00:05:48.480 --> 00:05:52.839
<v Speaker 2>and let us renegotiate this treaty now.

86
00:05:52.839 --> 00:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the things missing from the treaty is groundwater.

87
00:05:56.079 --> 00:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Even though aquifiers, which are basically an underground layer of

88
00:06:00.399 --> 00:06:05.319
<v Speaker 1>permeable rock or gravel that store and transmit groundwater, do

89
00:06:05.439 --> 00:06:07.439
<v Speaker 1>not follow political borders.

90
00:06:08.759 --> 00:06:12.959
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of these modern water sharing arrangements they

91
00:06:13.360 --> 00:06:17.399
<v Speaker 2>do take into account groundwater resources as well. Because groundwater

92
00:06:17.439 --> 00:06:20.439
<v Speaker 2>resources are also transboundary, they have an effect. They are

93
00:06:21.000 --> 00:06:24.360
<v Speaker 2>very directly related to the surface waters. In fact, they

94
00:06:24.560 --> 00:06:27.720
<v Speaker 2>form the same system. So in this water's treaty talks

95
00:06:27.720 --> 00:06:30.680
<v Speaker 2>only about surface waters and not about the groundwaters. There

96
00:06:30.680 --> 00:06:33.360
<v Speaker 2>are lots of other things that a modern water sharing

97
00:06:33.399 --> 00:06:38.759
<v Speaker 2>treaty would have, for example, environmental flows, for example, pollution

98
00:06:39.040 --> 00:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>load and some of these things even Pakistan, especially on

99
00:06:42.199 --> 00:06:44.720
<v Speaker 2>what can be dumped into a river and not those

100
00:06:45.120 --> 00:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of things that even Pakistan has raised concerns about

101
00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:53.399
<v Speaker 2>in the past. So a modern water sharing agreement would

102
00:06:53.439 --> 00:06:56.920
<v Speaker 2>be very different from what the Indus Waters Treaty is

103
00:06:57.360 --> 00:07:02.879
<v Speaker 2>because new techniques have come up, new methods for collaborative

104
00:07:03.040 --> 00:07:06.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, water management systems, they have come up. There

105
00:07:06.120 --> 00:07:08.759
<v Speaker 2>is new technology that have come up. So if we

106
00:07:08.879 --> 00:07:12.279
<v Speaker 2>have a newer treaty, which is what India is making

107
00:07:12.279 --> 00:07:15.439
<v Speaker 2>an argument for, then we can go in for a

108
00:07:15.560 --> 00:07:19.360
<v Speaker 2>very different sort of a more modern and more efficient

109
00:07:19.639 --> 00:07:22.319
<v Speaker 2>water management system in this basin.

110
00:07:23.480 --> 00:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But Amatab says climate is only one part of the problem.

111
00:07:28.519 --> 00:07:32.279
<v Speaker 2>Now we mentioned the fact that this current situation can

112
00:07:32.360 --> 00:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>be traced back to the twenty sixteen event, the attack

113
00:07:35.680 --> 00:07:38.040
<v Speaker 2>in Uri and the Prime Minister's statement.

114
00:07:38.199 --> 00:07:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Now, after that.

115
00:07:39.399 --> 00:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Things seemed to have normalized, but not quite. It was

116
00:07:43.720 --> 00:07:48.040
<v Speaker 2>at that point that India realized that the time was

117
00:07:48.279 --> 00:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>actually up and it was probably you know, the Indus

118
00:07:52.399 --> 00:07:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Waters Treaty should be used as a leverage or not

119
00:07:55.959 --> 00:07:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the treaty itself, but the fact that India was an

120
00:07:59.160 --> 00:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Upper Raperian state should be used as a leverage. If

121
00:08:03.480 --> 00:08:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Pakistan continues to support cross bowder terrorism or to send

122
00:08:09.040 --> 00:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>terrorists into the Indian side or carry out terrorists strikes

123
00:08:13.360 --> 00:08:13.839
<v Speaker 2>in India.

124
00:08:14.839 --> 00:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>India has formally issued notices to Pakistan seeking modification or

125
00:08:19.399 --> 00:08:23.759
<v Speaker 1>renegotiation of the treaty, but Pakistan has still not responded

126
00:08:23.759 --> 00:08:27.879
<v Speaker 1>to India's notices, even though it has made strong public statements,

127
00:08:28.040 --> 00:08:31.519
<v Speaker 1>organized and international conference on the treaty and warned of

128
00:08:31.600 --> 00:08:34.639
<v Speaker 1>consequences if river flows are disrupted.

129
00:08:35.799 --> 00:08:40.159
<v Speaker 2>So Pakistan has not responded to this specific request about

130
00:08:40.320 --> 00:08:43.960
<v Speaker 2>renegotiating the treaty. But it is not that there has

131
00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:47.440
<v Speaker 2>been no communication between the two countries. In fact, there

132
00:08:47.440 --> 00:08:52.559
<v Speaker 2>have been multiple communications, mostly about the sharing of data. Now,

133
00:08:52.759 --> 00:08:55.960
<v Speaker 2>as our listeners would know, under the Indus Waters Treaty,

134
00:08:56.440 --> 00:08:59.440
<v Speaker 2>there was a permanent mechanism that was set up called

135
00:08:59.519 --> 00:09:03.159
<v Speaker 2>the Permanent Indus Commission, and there used to be an

136
00:09:03.240 --> 00:09:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Indus Commissioner in both the countries who used to meet

137
00:09:07.840 --> 00:09:12.320
<v Speaker 2>every year to oversee the implementation of the treaty and

138
00:09:12.399 --> 00:09:13.480
<v Speaker 2>also share data.

139
00:09:14.679 --> 00:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Since India put the Treaty in abeyance, the Permanent Indus

140
00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Commission has effectively stopped functioning from India's perspective. However, communication

141
00:09:23.919 --> 00:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>between the two countries has not completely stopped. India has

142
00:09:27.519 --> 00:09:31.279
<v Speaker 1>continued to share some water related data with Pakistan through

143
00:09:31.360 --> 00:09:35.919
<v Speaker 1>diplomatic channels, including the Indian High Commission in Islamabad. This

144
00:09:35.960 --> 00:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is especially done when heavy rainfall or high river flows

145
00:09:40.279 --> 00:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>could require warnings. But this is no longer happening through

146
00:09:43.960 --> 00:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the treaty's regular system, so the flow of information is

147
00:09:47.759 --> 00:09:51.639
<v Speaker 1>not as regular or systematic as it was before. Now.

148
00:09:51.679 --> 00:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Another issue that Amitab highlights is institutional design.

149
00:09:56.679 --> 00:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Now there are lots of water sharing treaty across the world,

150
00:10:01.639 --> 00:10:05.679
<v Speaker 2>over eight hundred I think treaties. They exist across the

151
00:10:05.720 --> 00:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>world on a cross boundary water sharing and a lot

152
00:10:09.759 --> 00:10:13.320
<v Speaker 2>of them, at least the ones that have been negotiated

153
00:10:13.519 --> 00:10:16.360
<v Speaker 2>in modern times in the last couple of decades to

154
00:10:16.519 --> 00:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>three four decades, or even the ones that were done earlier.

155
00:10:20.200 --> 00:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Most of them have in built clauses to review the

156
00:10:25.519 --> 00:10:28.519
<v Speaker 2>working of the treaty after a certain period or have

157
00:10:28.639 --> 00:10:34.039
<v Speaker 2>some other mechanisms in which allows the participating countries to

158
00:10:34.600 --> 00:10:38.759
<v Speaker 2>have a relook at the treaty and amend the provisions

159
00:10:38.799 --> 00:10:42.639
<v Speaker 2>as needed. Because water sharing and the amount of water

160
00:10:42.759 --> 00:10:47.759
<v Speaker 2>flowing rivers is not constant, it keeps changing with time,

161
00:10:48.120 --> 00:10:51.919
<v Speaker 2>and in a lot of similar kind of treaties around

162
00:10:51.960 --> 00:10:55.639
<v Speaker 2>the world, there are inbuilt provisions to have a review

163
00:10:55.879 --> 00:10:59.120
<v Speaker 2>after a certain period of time. The Indus Waters Treaty

164
00:10:59.480 --> 00:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>does not have that, and though there are things that

165
00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:05.799
<v Speaker 2>can be done with the consent of the two countries,

166
00:11:05.919 --> 00:11:10.080
<v Speaker 2>but there is no sort of inbuilt review mechanism after

167
00:11:10.120 --> 00:11:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a certain time period as there is in India's other

168
00:11:14.159 --> 00:11:17.360
<v Speaker 2>water sharing agreement, the one that it has with Bangladesh,

169
00:11:17.440 --> 00:11:21.840
<v Speaker 2>for example, over the Ganga River. No, India and Bangladesh

170
00:11:22.159 --> 00:11:26.159
<v Speaker 2>have shared fifty four rivers between them, there is a treaty,

171
00:11:26.159 --> 00:11:29.080
<v Speaker 2>a water sharing agreement only on one of them, that

172
00:11:29.200 --> 00:11:32.639
<v Speaker 2>is the Ganga River. And that Ganga River treaty that

173
00:11:32.720 --> 00:11:36.080
<v Speaker 2>happened in nineteen ninety six, and it has an inbuilt

174
00:11:36.120 --> 00:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>mechanism which says we'll review the treaty after thirty years.

175
00:11:39.360 --> 00:11:43.159
<v Speaker 2>So this year, the Ganga Waters Treaty with Bangladesh is

176
00:11:43.159 --> 00:11:45.240
<v Speaker 2>coming to an end and it is up for review,

177
00:11:45.399 --> 00:11:47.720
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of others also have it. So Indus

178
00:11:47.759 --> 00:11:50.840
<v Speaker 2>did not have it. And what India is saying is, look,

179
00:11:50.879 --> 00:11:55.799
<v Speaker 2>the ground conditions have changed and therefore let's renegotiate the treaty.

180
00:11:56.960 --> 00:12:01.759
<v Speaker 1>And so the deeper question is what renegosi actually means here.

181
00:12:03.080 --> 00:12:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let's be very clear here. When India is

182
00:12:06.200 --> 00:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about renegotiation of the treaty. It is actually talking

183
00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:14.240
<v Speaker 2>about a completely new treaty. It's not about amending the

184
00:12:14.279 --> 00:12:17.759
<v Speaker 2>provisions of the Indus Waters Treaty. Now, these are the

185
00:12:17.840 --> 00:12:21.039
<v Speaker 2>kind of things that India will not say on record

186
00:12:21.120 --> 00:12:25.200
<v Speaker 2>and its official briefings and all. But it's very clear

187
00:12:25.519 --> 00:12:28.559
<v Speaker 2>that as far as India is concerned, and if we

188
00:12:28.799 --> 00:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>just drop our editorial precautions also for a second, what

189
00:12:33.320 --> 00:12:37.320
<v Speaker 2>the current position means is that the Indus Waters Treaty

190
00:12:37.600 --> 00:12:40.759
<v Speaker 2>is dead, at least as far as India is concerned.

191
00:12:41.080 --> 00:12:44.799
<v Speaker 2>Number two, this is something An entirely new treaty is

192
00:12:44.840 --> 00:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>something that is going to be very difficult for Pakistan

193
00:12:48.399 --> 00:12:52.039
<v Speaker 2>to accept. In fact, it would be unacceptable to Pakistan

194
00:12:52.360 --> 00:12:58.120
<v Speaker 2>because even as it routinely complains about the treaty being

195
00:12:58.399 --> 00:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>unfair to it, the fact is that even Pakistan realizes

196
00:13:02.120 --> 00:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>that this is a very good arrangement that it got

197
00:13:06.159 --> 00:13:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and this is the best that it can ever have

198
00:13:09.080 --> 00:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>have and any future water sharing arrangement or a treaty

199
00:13:13.639 --> 00:13:18.519
<v Speaker 2>with India probably would not be as good as the

200
00:13:18.720 --> 00:13:22.080
<v Speaker 2>current provisions of Indus Waters Treaty is. So, if the

201
00:13:22.279 --> 00:13:26.120
<v Speaker 2>talk is about a new treaty, which is what India.

202
00:13:26.240 --> 00:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Means now it would almost be completely unacceptable to Pakistan.

203
00:13:33.039 --> 00:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>An Amatam say is India's push for any new arrangement

204
00:13:37.000 --> 00:13:39.519
<v Speaker 1>would be for one that is strictly bilateral.

205
00:13:40.639 --> 00:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>As our listeners would know, the current Indus Waters Treaty

206
00:13:44.279 --> 00:13:47.759
<v Speaker 2>has a third party as well, the World Bank, which

207
00:13:47.799 --> 00:13:52.240
<v Speaker 2>facilitated the negotiations and which is the guaranteer of the treaty,

208
00:13:52.279 --> 00:13:57.720
<v Speaker 2>which is also sort of a facilitator in a dispute resolution.

209
00:13:58.120 --> 00:14:01.879
<v Speaker 2>So India would want any few treaty as a strictly

210
00:14:02.000 --> 00:14:07.159
<v Speaker 2>bilateral treaty against something that Pakistan would find it very,

211
00:14:07.240 --> 00:14:12.080
<v Speaker 2>very difficult to accept. Pakistan always finds comfort in the

212
00:14:12.200 --> 00:14:16.080
<v Speaker 2>fact that there is a third party involved to deal

213
00:14:16.120 --> 00:14:19.600
<v Speaker 2>with its relations with India, So any future treaty that

214
00:14:19.759 --> 00:14:23.320
<v Speaker 2>is going to be strictly bilateral would be difficult for

215
00:14:23.399 --> 00:14:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Pakistan to accept. So this is the situation as of now,

216
00:14:27.399 --> 00:14:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and it seems again dropping the precautions for a second,

217
00:14:32.240 --> 00:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>as it seems that the Indus Waters Treaty one would

218
00:14:36.799 --> 00:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>never be back to its original state as we had

219
00:14:41.000 --> 00:14:43.879
<v Speaker 2>seen a couple of years ago, and even a new

220
00:14:43.960 --> 00:14:46.759
<v Speaker 2>treaty might not be there to replace it.

221
00:14:47.960 --> 00:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So what that means is that we will remain in

222
00:14:50.519 --> 00:14:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the current situation where the two sides continue to share

223
00:14:53.919 --> 00:14:58.519
<v Speaker 1>river water without a formal agreement. But Amitav says this

224
00:14:58.559 --> 00:15:00.519
<v Speaker 1>is not unusual at.

225
00:15:01.279 --> 00:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>There are hundreds of rivers which are shared across countries,

226
00:15:05.320 --> 00:15:09.000
<v Speaker 2>which flow across boundaries of countries over which there are

227
00:15:09.039 --> 00:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>no water sharing arrangements. A very good case in point

228
00:15:12.799 --> 00:15:16.120
<v Speaker 2>is the transboundary rivers between India and China. We do

229
00:15:16.200 --> 00:15:20.279
<v Speaker 2>not have a proper treaty over water sharing of these

230
00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:23.759
<v Speaker 2>rivers over Brahmaputray and other rivers, even though we coordinate

231
00:15:23.879 --> 00:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and we share data with each other, but we do

232
00:15:26.320 --> 00:15:29.960
<v Speaker 2>not have a water sharing agreement. Similarly, as we mentioned

233
00:15:29.960 --> 00:15:33.720
<v Speaker 2>earlier with Bangladesh, we have an agreement only on Ganga,

234
00:15:33.759 --> 00:15:36.200
<v Speaker 2>whereas there are a lot many other rivers that flow

235
00:15:36.240 --> 00:15:40.399
<v Speaker 2>between the two countries. So it's not an unusual situation

236
00:15:40.679 --> 00:15:45.000
<v Speaker 2>wherein the river waters continue to flow across the two

237
00:15:45.039 --> 00:15:49.360
<v Speaker 2>countries without the two countries having a formal water sharing arrangement.

238
00:15:50.519 --> 00:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, another question that arises is what if Pakistan agrees

239
00:15:55.200 --> 00:15:56.159
<v Speaker 1>to renegotiate.

240
00:15:57.440 --> 00:16:01.000
<v Speaker 2>So even if let's say tomorrow Pakistan comes back and

241
00:16:01.000 --> 00:16:04.519
<v Speaker 2>says okay, let's renegotiate. You made the offer, we accept it.

242
00:16:04.679 --> 00:16:10.080
<v Speaker 2>The renegotiation is unlikely to begin anytime soon. Firstly because

243
00:16:10.159 --> 00:16:13.919
<v Speaker 2>India's decision to hold the treaty in a byans is

244
00:16:14.080 --> 00:16:20.399
<v Speaker 2>contingent on Pakistan stopping its support for cross border terrorism. Now,

245
00:16:20.440 --> 00:16:25.360
<v Speaker 2>if that happens overnight, that Pakistan, you know, stops supporting terrorism,

246
00:16:25.639 --> 00:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that would be a miracle, you know, So that's unlikely

247
00:16:28.320 --> 00:16:30.879
<v Speaker 2>to happen. So you know, this decision is not going

248
00:16:31.200 --> 00:16:35.120
<v Speaker 2>anywhere as unlikely to be changed. But even if supposing,

249
00:16:35.399 --> 00:16:39.399
<v Speaker 2>you know, a miracle happens, and you know, Pakistan stops

250
00:16:39.759 --> 00:16:44.039
<v Speaker 2>supporting cross border terrorism, as to the satisfaction of the

251
00:16:44.039 --> 00:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Indian side, even then, you know, India right now is

252
00:16:48.480 --> 00:16:53.039
<v Speaker 2>more concerned with finishing a lot of projects in Jerman Kashmir,

253
00:16:53.240 --> 00:16:57.600
<v Speaker 2>which had been held up for years because of Pakistan's

254
00:16:57.679 --> 00:17:02.600
<v Speaker 2>repeated objections in working the clauses of the Indus Waters Treaty.

255
00:17:02.759 --> 00:17:06.400
<v Speaker 2>And now because we no longer consider ourselves bound by

256
00:17:06.400 --> 00:17:09.839
<v Speaker 2>the provisions of Induswater's Treaty, we are going ahead in

257
00:17:10.000 --> 00:17:14.559
<v Speaker 2>completing those projects, and there are at least eight projects

258
00:17:14.559 --> 00:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>that are under construction right now. We would ideally like

259
00:17:17.720 --> 00:17:20.359
<v Speaker 2>to finish them, all of them in the next three

260
00:17:20.359 --> 00:17:24.519
<v Speaker 2>to four years and till that time as these projects

261
00:17:24.680 --> 00:17:29.200
<v Speaker 2>are completed. Frankly, we are not even interested in having

262
00:17:29.240 --> 00:17:33.039
<v Speaker 2>a new treaty in place. Primary concern is to somehow

263
00:17:33.200 --> 00:17:37.160
<v Speaker 2>get those projects completed in the next three to four years.

264
00:17:37.200 --> 00:17:40.240
<v Speaker 2>There is an investment of almost topia fifty thousand corod

265
00:17:40.359 --> 00:17:43.640
<v Speaker 2>that has been involved in this and we would like

266
00:17:43.720 --> 00:17:45.680
<v Speaker 2>to get that completed first.

267
00:17:50.880 --> 00:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And next we talk about the problem that farmers from

268
00:17:54.279 --> 00:18:00.079
<v Speaker 1>Rajasthan have with a particular GI or Geographical Indication tag,

269
00:17:59.519 --> 00:18:03.559
<v Speaker 1>this time awarded by the Geographical Indications Registry is given

270
00:18:03.599 --> 00:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to products that come from a specific geographical region and

271
00:18:07.079 --> 00:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>have unique characteristics or qualities. This essentially works like a

272
00:18:11.480 --> 00:18:15.839
<v Speaker 1>trademark in the international market. Think of tea from dadgelaying

273
00:18:16.200 --> 00:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>apples from kinnor silk from Mysore or Majuli masks from Asam.

274
00:18:21.400 --> 00:18:25.039
<v Speaker 1>All of these have received GI tags. The idea is

275
00:18:25.119 --> 00:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to protect the interests of local growers and artisans by

276
00:18:28.759 --> 00:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>preventing imitation and unauthorized sales of these products. Now recently,

277
00:18:34.039 --> 00:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the Unja region in Gujarat's Mesana District received a GI

278
00:18:38.359 --> 00:18:42.079
<v Speaker 1>tag in the name of the agricultural produced Market Committee.

279
00:18:42.200 --> 00:18:45.759
<v Speaker 1>The tag is for the region's Jira andsoft cuman and

280
00:18:45.799 --> 00:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fennel seeds, but farmers in the neighboring state of Rajasthan

281
00:18:49.599 --> 00:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>are unhappy with this GI tag. They argue that Unja

282
00:18:53.559 --> 00:18:57.319
<v Speaker 1>is primarily a marketing center rather than a production hub

283
00:18:57.400 --> 00:19:01.799
<v Speaker 1>for these two major seed spices. Further understand their argument

284
00:19:01.960 --> 00:19:04.079
<v Speaker 1>and what impact it could have on the sale of

285
00:19:04.119 --> 00:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>their produce, Michael Aharaka Nanda speaks to the indiet Expresses

286
00:19:08.039 --> 00:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Rural Affairs editor.

287
00:19:12.160 --> 00:19:15.880
<v Speaker 4>So Haj what is this dispute over GI tags for

288
00:19:16.039 --> 00:19:18.079
<v Speaker 4>Unja Jira and Unja Fenil.

289
00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:20.960
<v Speaker 5>And why are Rajasthans farmers opposing them?

290
00:19:21.640 --> 00:19:25.400
<v Speaker 3>So, the entire problem comes from the fact that Unja

291
00:19:25.440 --> 00:19:28.960
<v Speaker 3>doesn't seem to be a big place of production of

292
00:19:29.079 --> 00:19:33.039
<v Speaker 3>either Jura or either Jira or for that matter, Jira

293
00:19:33.119 --> 00:19:35.799
<v Speaker 3>is basically cuman seed and or off of that matter,

294
00:19:35.920 --> 00:19:38.960
<v Speaker 3>storms which is basically final. So Unja is known as

295
00:19:38.960 --> 00:19:42.599
<v Speaker 3>a place of marketing. It's probably the world's biggest market

296
00:19:42.680 --> 00:19:46.079
<v Speaker 3>for these seeds sprices. This is probably one of the

297
00:19:46.119 --> 00:19:50.160
<v Speaker 3>first cases where produce, you know, GI is being given

298
00:19:50.400 --> 00:19:53.359
<v Speaker 3>to a produce not from where it has grown, but

299
00:19:53.480 --> 00:19:56.119
<v Speaker 3>from but where it is marketed and it is definitely

300
00:19:56.160 --> 00:19:58.799
<v Speaker 3>being marketed in a very big way, There's no doubt

301
00:19:58.799 --> 00:20:01.440
<v Speaker 3>about it, you know. And I think that is where

302
00:20:01.920 --> 00:20:05.200
<v Speaker 3>the farmers from Rajasthan have raised an objection. There is

303
00:20:05.240 --> 00:20:08.160
<v Speaker 3>also a second problem, which according to me, seems to

304
00:20:08.200 --> 00:20:12.400
<v Speaker 3>be more authentic. You know. See, it's crucible that you know,

305
00:20:12.680 --> 00:20:17.000
<v Speaker 3>jira cultivation originated in Unja and the nearby areas. You know,

306
00:20:17.160 --> 00:20:20.400
<v Speaker 3>so when we say Unja and the nearby areas, it

307
00:20:20.400 --> 00:20:24.680
<v Speaker 3>would mean Meisana district, Okay. But in this case, what

308
00:20:24.720 --> 00:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>they have done is, you know, they've applied for the

309
00:20:27.039 --> 00:20:30.720
<v Speaker 3>GI and this GA covers almost half of Gujarat. You know,

310
00:20:30.920 --> 00:20:33.680
<v Speaker 3>it's not just Messana district. You know, Unja is in

311
00:20:33.799 --> 00:20:37.759
<v Speaker 3>Nassana district. It also includes you know nearby districts you know, Banas,

312
00:20:37.799 --> 00:20:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Contact Patan, Gadhima there and goes all the way to Cutch. More.

313
00:20:42.799 --> 00:20:47.160
<v Speaker 3>We which seems a little real problem. So what farmers

314
00:20:47.200 --> 00:20:50.519
<v Speaker 3>in Rajasthan are saying that there are many parts in

315
00:20:50.640 --> 00:20:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Rajasthan where we are growing jira and songs and which

316
00:20:54.160 --> 00:20:59.039
<v Speaker 3>are closer to Unja market than absolutely distant places within

317
00:20:59.079 --> 00:21:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Gujarat and Arish.

318
00:21:01.240 --> 00:21:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Who grants these GI tags is there any specific organization

319
00:21:05.039 --> 00:21:05.680
<v Speaker 4>for this task.

320
00:21:06.240 --> 00:21:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Ideally, when you grant a geographical indication, you know, they

321
00:21:11.000 --> 00:21:14.519
<v Speaker 3>should be some validation from a third party, from a

322
00:21:14.559 --> 00:21:18.000
<v Speaker 3>third party which is independent, you know and has the

323
00:21:18.079 --> 00:21:22.119
<v Speaker 3>domain expertise. Whereas here, I think the validation they have

324
00:21:22.240 --> 00:21:26.599
<v Speaker 3>taken from you know, entirely institutions within Gujarat, like for example,

325
00:21:26.640 --> 00:21:31.119
<v Speaker 3>the Dantewada Agricultural University in Barnas contacts and the Directorate

326
00:21:31.160 --> 00:21:35.160
<v Speaker 3>of Horticulture Environment of Gujarat, you know, and then Entrepreneurship

327
00:21:35.240 --> 00:21:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Development Institute of India, you know, Gujarat. So when the

328
00:21:38.759 --> 00:21:41.960
<v Speaker 3>GI Registry in Jena, which is at all an all

329
00:21:42.000 --> 00:21:46.599
<v Speaker 3>India organization, when they grant the geographical indication, they should

330
00:21:46.640 --> 00:21:50.599
<v Speaker 3>be looking at, you know, who is authenticating all these data,

331
00:21:50.759 --> 00:21:53.599
<v Speaker 3>the information and all these things. So ideally, I think

332
00:21:53.880 --> 00:21:58.319
<v Speaker 3>maybe in the case of Unja Jira and Unja songs,

333
00:21:58.359 --> 00:22:01.039
<v Speaker 3>you know, to show that this is very unique, you know,

334
00:22:01.240 --> 00:22:04.160
<v Speaker 3>it's not grown anywhere. It is indigenous, So maybe we

335
00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:07.799
<v Speaker 3>should have taken the opinion of saying an institution like

336
00:22:07.839 --> 00:22:11.279
<v Speaker 3>the ICA, you know, the Indian Council for agul Cultural Research,

337
00:22:11.440 --> 00:22:14.720
<v Speaker 3>so ICR has even an institute you know, it's called

338
00:22:14.720 --> 00:22:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the National Research Center on Seat Spicies, which is a

339
00:22:18.200 --> 00:22:20.839
<v Speaker 3>nudgemir you know, so some kind of a third party

340
00:22:20.920 --> 00:22:24.359
<v Speaker 3>certification is required. You know. See, ultimately, when we are

341
00:22:24.440 --> 00:22:27.319
<v Speaker 3>giving out a GI for anything, the world has to

342
00:22:27.400 --> 00:22:30.000
<v Speaker 3>respect it, right, the world has to say, hey, okay,

343
00:22:30.200 --> 00:22:34.119
<v Speaker 3>ounda gira blasma TV dazzling tea. Yeah, this has been

344
00:22:34.200 --> 00:22:37.200
<v Speaker 3>based on, you know, some kind of an independent validation.

345
00:22:37.920 --> 00:22:40.839
<v Speaker 4>And how does this GI tag impact farmers who are

346
00:22:40.880 --> 00:22:43.880
<v Speaker 4>growing this funnel and human what is its significance?

347
00:22:44.839 --> 00:22:48.319
<v Speaker 3>So I think what farmers in Rajasthan are spared is

348
00:22:48.400 --> 00:22:51.240
<v Speaker 3>that next time when they go to sell you know,

349
00:22:51.400 --> 00:22:55.240
<v Speaker 3>gira or some their prices will be beaten down. See

350
00:22:55.279 --> 00:22:58.440
<v Speaker 3>what does a GI do. GI basically confers a premium

351
00:22:58.559 --> 00:23:01.480
<v Speaker 3>to the produce of a particular region. Right, so the

352
00:23:01.599 --> 00:23:04.279
<v Speaker 3>farmer is scared that, you know, the traders will say, no,

353
00:23:04.559 --> 00:23:07.279
<v Speaker 3>you're a Gira is not Unja gira. It is basically

354
00:23:07.359 --> 00:23:08.240
<v Speaker 3>Rajasthan gira.

355
00:23:08.400 --> 00:23:08.519
<v Speaker 1>You know.

356
00:23:08.720 --> 00:23:12.240
<v Speaker 3>So farmers are afraid that they'll be a marking down

357
00:23:12.519 --> 00:23:14.880
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to the price. You know. So farmers

358
00:23:14.960 --> 00:23:19.400
<v Speaker 3>are definitely worried that they produce will be discounted. Whereas

359
00:23:19.480 --> 00:23:22.119
<v Speaker 3>any gra which has grown in any part of Gujarat,

360
00:23:22.160 --> 00:23:25.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, very wide GI area within that will fetch

361
00:23:25.960 --> 00:23:28.920
<v Speaker 3>a premium. Why are we granting GI? We are granting

362
00:23:29.000 --> 00:23:32.400
<v Speaker 3>GI so that the producers of something, you know, which

363
00:23:32.480 --> 00:23:35.599
<v Speaker 3>is unique, they are able to fetch a premium right

364
00:23:36.079 --> 00:23:39.079
<v Speaker 3>when they sell, whether in the domestic market or in

365
00:23:39.119 --> 00:23:42.480
<v Speaker 3>the world market. Right like Scott's whisky will always command

366
00:23:42.519 --> 00:23:45.960
<v Speaker 3>a premium over regular whiskey, even if it is a

367
00:23:46.039 --> 00:23:49.839
<v Speaker 3>single mold whiskey. Right. So, since everything ultimately has to

368
00:23:49.920 --> 00:23:53.519
<v Speaker 3>do with valuation, you know, see, a trademark brand GI

369
00:23:53.880 --> 00:23:58.359
<v Speaker 3>always ultimately is what it is, basically fetching you a premium. Right.

370
00:23:58.559 --> 00:24:02.079
<v Speaker 4>But then what evidence did the unja APMC rely on

371
00:24:02.240 --> 00:24:04.319
<v Speaker 4>to secure these GI registrations.

372
00:24:05.039 --> 00:24:07.799
<v Speaker 3>See, they seem to have submitted a lot of data

373
00:24:08.119 --> 00:24:12.079
<v Speaker 3>showing about gira and about sound, but these seem to

374
00:24:12.160 --> 00:24:14.279
<v Speaker 3>be general you know, I don't know whether they have

375
00:24:14.359 --> 00:24:18.200
<v Speaker 3>been able to establish that this Gira is very different

376
00:24:18.319 --> 00:24:21.640
<v Speaker 3>from the gira which is being grown in Rajasthan or

377
00:24:22.480 --> 00:24:26.079
<v Speaker 3>just the adjoining district. You know, So I think again,

378
00:24:26.200 --> 00:24:28.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, even if they have submitted has all this

379
00:24:29.160 --> 00:24:31.880
<v Speaker 3>data and all this information, has it been subject to

380
00:24:32.359 --> 00:24:33.480
<v Speaker 3>third party validation?

381
00:24:33.680 --> 00:24:37.960
<v Speaker 5>You know, and how has apm C responded to the objections.

382
00:24:38.799 --> 00:24:41.240
<v Speaker 3>So I think the objections have been raised for the

383
00:24:41.279 --> 00:24:44.559
<v Speaker 3>first time through Indian Express, you know, our Indian Express report,

384
00:24:44.799 --> 00:24:48.400
<v Speaker 3>because this GI was granted sometime in March or something,

385
00:24:48.480 --> 00:24:51.400
<v Speaker 3>you know. And then and then I think the trade

386
00:24:51.440 --> 00:24:55.200
<v Speaker 3>in Rajasthan farmers organizations et cetera came to know about

387
00:24:55.240 --> 00:24:56.839
<v Speaker 3>this whole thing, you know, because I think it is

388
00:24:56.880 --> 00:24:59.400
<v Speaker 3>even publicized. I think about a month back, you know,

389
00:24:59.759 --> 00:25:03.039
<v Speaker 3>and and I think the Gujura Chief Minister, everybody tweeted

390
00:25:03.119 --> 00:25:06.039
<v Speaker 3>about it, you know, they talked about it. Indiancy says

391
00:25:06.079 --> 00:25:09.400
<v Speaker 3>that the jira cultivation started in Unja only before it

392
00:25:09.519 --> 00:25:12.680
<v Speaker 3>spread to other places, you know. And they're saying that

393
00:25:13.400 --> 00:25:16.759
<v Speaker 3>we want the Sunjai area to again start growing jira

394
00:25:16.839 --> 00:25:18.759
<v Speaker 3>in a big way, and one way to do it

395
00:25:19.000 --> 00:25:22.160
<v Speaker 3>is through the GI claim, you know. And they claim

396
00:25:22.200 --> 00:25:25.480
<v Speaker 3>that you know, now this Gunja jira will give a

397
00:25:25.599 --> 00:25:29.480
<v Speaker 3>huge spurt in for cultivation and that farmers will and

398
00:25:29.640 --> 00:25:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Unja will now become again also a major cultivation center.

399
00:25:33.240 --> 00:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>That's what they are saying.

400
00:25:34.759 --> 00:25:38.279
<v Speaker 4>But if Rajastan produces a significant share of India's cumin

401
00:25:38.319 --> 00:25:41.079
<v Speaker 4>and fennel, why didn't it to see the g I

402
00:25:41.160 --> 00:25:42.119
<v Speaker 4>tag instead.

403
00:25:42.480 --> 00:25:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Probably because they never applied for it, though I'm told

404
00:25:45.039 --> 00:25:47.359
<v Speaker 3>that there are some people who are trying to push

405
00:25:47.480 --> 00:25:50.920
<v Speaker 3>for Barmeir JIRA kind of a thing, you know, so

406
00:25:51.319 --> 00:25:54.079
<v Speaker 3>since probably Barmeir is probably one of the largest growing

407
00:25:54.720 --> 00:25:57.079
<v Speaker 3>JIRA districts in India, so I think they have been

408
00:25:57.160 --> 00:25:59.400
<v Speaker 3>planning to apply. But I think we should be very

409
00:25:59.440 --> 00:26:03.799
<v Speaker 3>careful about granting GIS to every single product then, you know,

410
00:26:04.000 --> 00:26:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of thinking should go into this thing,

411
00:26:06.759 --> 00:26:08.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, And I think this is a test case

412
00:26:08.839 --> 00:26:12.480
<v Speaker 3>and hopefully there will be a rethink on all these things,

413
00:26:12.519 --> 00:26:15.319
<v Speaker 3>you know, because ultimately, you know, it is all about credibility, right.

414
00:26:15.920 --> 00:26:17.720
<v Speaker 5>So haris what happens next?

415
00:26:18.039 --> 00:26:22.440
<v Speaker 4>Is there a mechanism to challenge and already granted GI registration.

416
00:26:22.640 --> 00:26:25.359
<v Speaker 5>And what should we watch for in the upcoming months.

417
00:26:26.279 --> 00:26:28.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it can be challenged in a courte of law.

418
00:26:28.880 --> 00:26:31.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure whether there is an appeal system within

419
00:26:31.519 --> 00:26:34.279
<v Speaker 3>the GI registry, you know. From what I know, I

420
00:26:34.319 --> 00:26:37.079
<v Speaker 3>think they published this in one of their journals and

421
00:26:37.240 --> 00:26:40.240
<v Speaker 3>it is supposed to invite objections within a three month period,

422
00:26:40.640 --> 00:26:43.920
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not sure whether they published it much earlier

423
00:26:44.240 --> 00:26:45.960
<v Speaker 3>or whatever it is, you know, but whatever it is,

424
00:26:46.079 --> 00:26:49.039
<v Speaker 3>I think they will have to invite objections and it

425
00:26:49.160 --> 00:26:51.960
<v Speaker 3>has to be heard, so either heard by the registry

426
00:26:51.960 --> 00:26:53.960
<v Speaker 3>itself or maybe I don't know, I was supposed to

427
00:26:54.160 --> 00:26:56.440
<v Speaker 3>go to regular courtes, you know, whether a High court

428
00:26:56.599 --> 00:26:59.680
<v Speaker 3>or something. Definitely any grant of whether it is a

429
00:27:00.039 --> 00:27:02.720
<v Speaker 3>a trademark or say you can challenge it. I mean,

430
00:27:02.880 --> 00:27:06.519
<v Speaker 3>nothing stops anyone from challenging. For example, in the case

431
00:27:06.559 --> 00:27:10.440
<v Speaker 3>of I think some Linen or probably an inner Way

432
00:27:10.519 --> 00:27:13.240
<v Speaker 3>company used it for their product and then a move

433
00:27:13.319 --> 00:27:15.559
<v Speaker 3>went and challenged it, right, I mean, so I'm sure

434
00:27:15.680 --> 00:27:18.319
<v Speaker 3>this can be challenge and I would be surprised if

435
00:27:18.359 --> 00:27:20.680
<v Speaker 3>it is challenged. And ideally this should not become a

436
00:27:20.720 --> 00:27:23.559
<v Speaker 3>political thing, you know, and so maybe the government of

437
00:27:23.640 --> 00:27:25.680
<v Speaker 3>India can play a neutral role in this, you know,

438
00:27:26.000 --> 00:27:30.039
<v Speaker 3>in trying to arbitrate between the farmers of two states.

439
00:27:30.079 --> 00:27:32.079
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's better that it doesn't go to the

440
00:27:32.200 --> 00:27:36.039
<v Speaker 3>courts and it becomes an unnecessary war, which ultimately, you know,

441
00:27:36.079 --> 00:27:39.519
<v Speaker 3>they'll pre India's own reputation, right, and people will start

442
00:27:39.599 --> 00:27:42.799
<v Speaker 3>asking questions on take, do you have a purpose system

443
00:27:42.880 --> 00:27:45.599
<v Speaker 3>for crafting GI and this kind of a thing. So

444
00:27:45.839 --> 00:27:49.319
<v Speaker 3>ultimately I think this is connected also with India's reputation,

445
00:27:49.519 --> 00:27:53.799
<v Speaker 3>you know, in terms of providing intellectual property protection right

446
00:27:53.960 --> 00:27:56.440
<v Speaker 3>and GA is nothing but an IPI. It is an

447
00:27:56.480 --> 00:27:57.759
<v Speaker 3>intellectual property right.

448
00:28:03.319 --> 00:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And in the end we talk about a proposed railway

449
00:28:06.480 --> 00:28:11.039
<v Speaker 1>expansion through one of Central India's most important tiger landscapes,

450
00:28:11.480 --> 00:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>which has received in principal wildlife clearance despite concerns that

451
00:28:16.240 --> 00:28:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it could fragment the corridor connecting the Sathpuddha and mail

452
00:28:19.880 --> 00:28:24.039
<v Speaker 1>Card tiger reserves. The Standing Committee of the National Board

453
00:28:24.160 --> 00:28:28.079
<v Speaker 1>for Wildlife has recommended clearance for a third railway line

454
00:28:28.440 --> 00:28:32.640
<v Speaker 1>between Jijharpur and Chichonda in Matya Pradesh. As reported by

455
00:28:32.680 --> 00:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>The Indian Express is Nikil Ghannaker. The alignment will pass

456
00:28:36.559 --> 00:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>through two notified tiger corridors and an eco sensitive zone

457
00:28:40.519 --> 00:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Satpurda mail Card landscape. Now, these corridors are

458
00:28:44.240 --> 00:28:48.759
<v Speaker 1>not used by tigers alone. They allow leopards, sloth bears,

459
00:28:49.160 --> 00:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>herbivores and other species to move between habitats while also

460
00:28:53.480 --> 00:28:58.319
<v Speaker 1>supporting dispersal and genetic exchange between wildlife populations. The one

461
00:28:58.400 --> 00:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty kilometers second is part of a large

462
00:29:01.759 --> 00:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>proposal to add third and fourth lines along the busy

463
00:29:05.359 --> 00:29:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Attsi Nakpur railway route. The project requires more than two

464
00:29:09.240 --> 00:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and six hectares of land within the notified corridor,

465
00:29:13.279 --> 00:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>including nearly seventy five hectares of forest land. Nickel highlights

466
00:29:18.160 --> 00:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that what makes the approval significant, however, is the condition

467
00:29:21.799 --> 00:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>attached to it. Central Railway has proposed thirty four wildlife

468
00:29:26.079 --> 00:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>overpasses to help animals cross the railway alignment safely, but

469
00:29:30.279 --> 00:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>an inspection committee found that these locations were selected largely

470
00:29:34.599 --> 00:29:39.519
<v Speaker 1>using information from frontline forest staff and wildlife mortality records,

471
00:29:39.960 --> 00:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than through a detailed scientific assessment. The committee also

472
00:29:44.079 --> 00:29:47.519
<v Speaker 1>noted that the engineering designs for these structures had not

473
00:29:47.680 --> 00:29:51.519
<v Speaker 1>been finalized, while a broader study examining the project's landscape

474
00:29:51.599 --> 00:29:55.519
<v Speaker 1>level impact was still awaited. The Wildlife Board has therefore

475
00:29:55.599 --> 00:29:59.319
<v Speaker 1>said the overpasses must be reviewed and redesigned on the

476
00:29:59.359 --> 00:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>basis of some scientific evidence and proper engineering studies. Once

477
00:30:03.720 --> 00:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the relevant data is examined, the inspection committee must revisit

478
00:30:07.799 --> 00:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the project area and make final recommendations concerning the structure's location, size, design,

479
00:30:14.079 --> 00:30:17.559
<v Speaker 1>and connectivity. So while the railway project has moved one

480
00:30:17.640 --> 00:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>step closer to approval, its final mitigation plan remains unsettled.

481
00:30:22.559 --> 00:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Nikol notes that the central question is whether wildlife crossings

482
00:30:26.640 --> 00:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>added after the alignment has been approved can genuinely preserve

483
00:30:30.519 --> 00:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a corridor that conservation officials themselves have described as a

484
00:30:34.960 --> 00:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>lifeline for the wider Satpuda page mail Guard landscape. You

485
00:30:41.960 --> 00:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>were listening to Three Things by the Indiet Express. Today's

486
00:30:44.960 --> 00:30:48.039
<v Speaker 1>show was edited and mixed by Sish Pavar and produced

487
00:30:48.079 --> 00:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>by an Ahurakananda and me Ichasharma. If you like the show,

488
00:30:51.640 --> 00:30:54.359
<v Speaker 1>do subscribe to us wherever you get your podcast. You

489
00:30:54.440 --> 00:30:56.839
<v Speaker 1>can also recommend it to someone you think may like it,

490
00:30:57.079 --> 00:30:59.359
<v Speaker 1>with a friend or in your family. This is the

491
00:30:59.400 --> 00:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>best way for people to get to know about us.

492
00:31:01.839 --> 00:31:04.759
<v Speaker 1>You can also tweet us at Express podcast or write

493
00:31:04.799 --> 00:31:07.519
<v Speaker 1>to us at podcast at Indian Express dot com.
