Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act.
Speaker 2: It's the David Knight Show. As a clock strikes thirteen,
Speaker 2: It's Thursday, the fourth of December of Our Lord twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five. Well, today we're going to look at some
Speaker 2: of the harbingers of what is coming with the technocracy, AI,
Speaker 2: humanoid robots. Even China is concerned. China is concerned, not
Speaker 2: so much about the authoritarian consequences they like that, they're
Speaker 2: concerned even about a bubble in their own country, that
Speaker 2: maybe they're investing too much into this area malinvestment. Who
Speaker 2: would have thought that that would happen with an economy
Speaker 2: that is controlled by the government. But we'll take a
Speaker 2: look at we'll take a look at that. We'll also
Speaker 2: take a look Joe Rogan has an interesting theory about
Speaker 2: Jesus coming back as artificial intelligence. I just about fell
Speaker 2: out of my chair when I saw that. But we
Speaker 2: have other news that is not quite as comical as that,
Speaker 2: and we'll be right back to stay with us. Well
Speaker 2: before we get into some of the weightier issues and
Speaker 2: what is happening in terms of the cultural drift. I
Speaker 2: thought this is a very interesting article and it really
Speaker 2: does go back to the Second Amendment and your right
Speaker 2: to defend yourself, and it also goes back to the
Speaker 2: mandates about the vaccines and things like that. In formed
Speaker 2: consent when it comes to your life, you are not
Speaker 2: owned by corporations. This is an example of a woman
Speaker 2: twenty five years old who had been working very late night,
Speaker 2: dangerous shift at a convenience store chained seven to eleven,
Speaker 2: and she was attacked by man in the convenience store
Speaker 2: late at night, which she's there basically by herself, and
Speaker 2: she tried to back him off with a gun and
Speaker 2: he would not do it. He attacked her physically, made
Speaker 2: contact and hurt her, but she killed him with a gun,
Speaker 2: and so then seven eleven fired her because she was
Speaker 2: carrying a gun. But as John Lotte points out, the
Speaker 2: reason that she had a gun was the reason that
Speaker 2: she's alive. When you look at these statistics, the gun
Speaker 2: is at least gives women a fighting chance. If they
Speaker 2: watched the Marvel movies these other things where women are
Speaker 2: the you know, taking out a whole group of men.
Speaker 2: Anything that is simply wishful, wish fulfillment for women, that
Speaker 2: is nothing that has to do with reality.
Speaker 3: And statistics, But.
Speaker 4: You don't understand it's seven eleven's policy for workers to
Speaker 4: die when they are.
Speaker 2: That's right, just like it was a policy of a
Speaker 2: lot of companies who wanted to do business with the
Speaker 2: federal government, and Biden made that a condition, and so
Speaker 2: they said, so you will take the shot or you'll
Speaker 2: lose your job. So last week seven love and fire
Speaker 2: to the twenty five year old after she used her
Speaker 2: gun to save her own life. Private companies have every
Speaker 2: right to set rules for employee behavior, but many corporate
Speaker 2: policies that require workers to remain passive and comply with
Speaker 2: criminals demands rest on a deeply mistaken view of crime data.
Speaker 2: You know, when I saw this, I maybe when Karen
Speaker 2: and I were living in Houston. She was a district
Speaker 2: personnel manager for a convenience store chain, not seven eleven,
Speaker 2: another one, and so they had policies about how they
Speaker 2: were supposed to act if it was a robbery. This
Speaker 2: is not a robbery. This is a guy who was
Speaker 2: attacking her to rape or kill her. But when I
Speaker 2: had a robbery, you know, they're just supposed to hand
Speaker 2: them the money and not get involved in a fight.
Speaker 2: In terms of a conflict. The problem was that they
Speaker 2: had they had a lot of Asian employees who their
Speaker 2: reaction to a robbery, especially if it was somebody that
Speaker 2: was a different ethnic group, their response was to kind
Speaker 2: of smile or whatever. It just set off flags with
Speaker 2: the other ethnic group that was typically doing the robberies,
Speaker 2: and they were getting shot very frequently. And you have
Speaker 2: a situation where and you see this over and over again,
Speaker 2: you have some ethnic group that comes in. It's not
Speaker 2: just white people to hire other white people. If you
Speaker 2: get Mexicans and they will hire other Mexicans and Asians
Speaker 2: and they'll hire other Asians. And so they had a
Speaker 2: manager and he was a martial arts expert. I mean,
Speaker 2: Karen had seen him do some pretty amazing things just
Speaker 2: to demonstrate his precision kicking abilities and things like that,
Speaker 2: you know, just as a demonstration, not out of anger.
Speaker 2: He did like a sidekick to a manager that was
Speaker 2: staying there and just came within like an inch of
Speaker 2: his face, deliberately pulling it back. So anyway, this guy
Speaker 2: was pretty bulked up and he was very agile and everything.
Speaker 2: And so he was there during one of these robberies
Speaker 2: and the robber had a gun and this guy. His
Speaker 2: name was Sue, by the way, it's kind of the
Speaker 2: Johnny Cash song. You know a boy named Sue. But
Speaker 2: I don't know if he got rigged ribbed about that
Speaker 2: or not. But he was a nice guy. He is
Speaker 2: a nice guy. But he decided that he could take
Speaker 2: on a gun with martial arts. It's kind of like
Speaker 2: the Boxer Rebellion in China. That's why they call it
Speaker 2: the boxer rebellion because the British came in with armed
Speaker 2: soldiers and the Chinese fought them with martial arts and lost.
Speaker 2: And he got shot and killed in that, and so
Speaker 2: the same type of thing. You know, if you're a woman,
Speaker 2: you need a gun to give yourself at least a
Speaker 2: chance if the person's got a gun, and if they
Speaker 2: don't have a gun, even if the person's much bigger
Speaker 2: than you, if you got the gun, you have the advantage,
Speaker 2: even if the person is a martial arts expert. So
Speaker 2: he said he threatened me, and he said he was
Speaker 2: going to slice my head off, and that's when I
Speaker 2: tried to call the police. He started throwing things at me,
Speaker 2: came behind the counter. I tried to run off, but
Speaker 2: he grabbed his put his hands around my neck, pushed
Speaker 2: me on the counterspace. That's when I pulled out my
Speaker 2: gun and shot him. I had to choose between my
Speaker 2: job and my life. Just like five years ago, we
Speaker 2: had a lot of people had to do that. I
Speaker 2: guess four years ago it was twenty twenty one. I
Speaker 2: will always choose my life because people depend on me.
Speaker 2: My kids need me here. She survived with wounds to
Speaker 2: the neck and hands, injuries that could have been far worse.
Speaker 2: Her attacker, fifty nine year old Kenneth Thompson, already had
Speaker 2: an outstanding felony warrant for a parole violation and for
Speaker 2: his latest crimes. Prosecutors have charged him with assault and
Speaker 2: battery so he did not die, and also threatening acts
Speaker 2: of violence and attempting to pass a fake bill. Maybe
Speaker 2: that's what started the whole thing to begin with. Maybe
Speaker 2: he was passing some counterfeit money. She called him on it.
Speaker 2: For more than two years, this woman has worked the
Speaker 2: dangerous eleven PM to seven am shift alone, so she
Speaker 2: was working eleven to seven at seven eleven. Despite those conditions,
Speaker 2: seven to eleven insisted that she use only store items
Speaker 2: to defend herself.
Speaker 3: Would you like some breath minuts instead.
Speaker 2: You know it's Unfortunately, while some of the media many
Speaker 2: businesses may concede that passive behavior by store clerks might
Speaker 2: encourage more crime, they believe that passive behavior is still
Speaker 2: the safest course of action. But John Lotte points out
Speaker 2: for women, the most dangerous form of resistance is to
Speaker 2: fight with their fists, because doing so often triggers a
Speaker 2: violent physical reaction from the attacker. The next most dangerous
Speaker 2: choice is to run. Escaping is ideal when possible, but
Speaker 2: women generally run more slowly than men. We kind of
Speaker 2: learned that lesson thanks to the transgenders, haven't we really
Speaker 2: much of a question anymore? And if you're tackled from behind,
Speaker 2: that can produce serious injury. Other options, such as using
Speaker 2: a baseball bat or a knife, turn out to not
Speaker 2: be much better because women are at a disadvantage whenever
Speaker 2: they come into physical contact with a male attacker. By contrast,
Speaker 2: the safest option for a woman confronted by criminals have
Speaker 2: a gun. Women who rely on passive behavior are two
Speaker 2: and a half times more likely to suffer serious injury
Speaker 2: than women who defend themselves with a firearm. Murder rates
Speaker 2: fall when either men or women carry concealed handguns, where
Speaker 2: the reduction is especially large for women. Each additional woman
Speaker 2: with a concealed carry permit lowers the female murder rate
Speaker 2: by roughly three to four times more than each additional
Speaker 2: male permit holder lowers the male murder rate. So the
Speaker 2: bottom line, he says, fortune, her children still have their mother.
Speaker 2: And this is the type of thing that the media
Speaker 2: doesn't usually like to pay attention to. You know, the
Speaker 2: gun is a tool, and it can be used to
Speaker 2: take life or to defend life, and many times it
Speaker 2: doesn't even need to be fired in order to defend life.
Speaker 2: So Trump is confirmed that Biden's autopen documents, orders and
Speaker 2: pardons are void. And so you've got a lot of
Speaker 2: people saying, Wow, that means that Fauci's pardon is not legit.
Speaker 2: We can go after him. Does that mean that Hunter's
Speaker 2: pardon is not legit, we can go after him. Well,
Speaker 2: it's not that simple, Trump said. Anyone receiving pardons, commutations,
Speaker 2: or any other legal document so signed with an autopen
Speaker 2: please be advised that said document has been fully and
Speaker 2: completely terminated and is of no legal effect. Thank you
Speaker 2: for your attention to this matter. It signs off on
Speaker 2: a So the issue though, is, how do you prove
Speaker 2: that this is not done with Biden's consent, that some
Speaker 2: employees did it with the autopen and he didn't know
Speaker 2: about it. Joe Biden was not involved in the autopen process,
Speaker 2: and if he says he was, he will be brought
Speaker 2: up on charges of perjury, said Trump. The autopen, which
Speaker 2: uses a real pen and et to mechanically replicate a
Speaker 2: president's signature, can be used to sign official documents, but
Speaker 2: the president must direct the signing of each document or bill,
Speaker 2: according to the Office of Legal Counsel. So again, you
Speaker 2: get into this murket area. How do you prove whether
Speaker 2: you authorize that or not. According to some legal scholars,
Speaker 2: US presidents may revoke previous issued executive orders. However, revoking
Speaker 2: pardons may not be constitutional and could face roadblocks, experts
Speaker 2: told me Epic Times. So has that stopped Trump in
Speaker 2: the past doing auto tariffs? I don't mean buy that cars.
Speaker 2: I mean just I do it myself. I don't need
Speaker 2: to get anybody else in government involved. We'll see if
Speaker 2: that holds. I hope it doesn't. A US House Committee
Speaker 2: on Oversight, led by James Comer, published a report in
Speaker 2: October detailing and investigation in the Biden's use of autopen signatures,
Speaker 2: I should say the Biden Administration's use of it. The
Speaker 2: committee stated it found evidence that Biden's White House staff
Speaker 2: concealed his diminishing mental and physical condition intentionally. The committee
Speaker 2: has found that there was, in fact a cover up
Speaker 2: of the president's cognitive decline, and that there is no
Speaker 2: record demonstrating Biden himself made all of the executive decisions
Speaker 2: that were attributed to him. So what this will do
Speaker 2: is that, in other words, if the president is there,
Speaker 2: it would be mentally there and not mentally impaired. Then,
Speaker 2: of course, if somebody signs a document there assumed that
Speaker 2: it was done with his consent, because if they did
Speaker 2: it without his consent, he would call him on it. Right, So,
Speaker 2: in order to make this stick as an autopen president
Speaker 2: that he can overturn this stuff, they have to make
Speaker 2: it about Biden's cognitive condition. If he was not aware
Speaker 2: of anything that was going on, then clearly this is
Speaker 2: being done by the staff and not by him.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: It's not even necessary for Trump to have to go
Speaker 2: that route. If he's talking about other executive orders other
Speaker 2: than pardons. So I think that's the other aspect of this.
Speaker 2: It does two things. It brings back up these you know,
Speaker 2: the revenge aspect and also the calls from MAGA to
Speaker 2: get Fauci. I don't think Trump would go after Fauci,
Speaker 2: even if he said his pardon was not there, because
Speaker 2: remember the last thing he did was to give Fauci
Speaker 2: a medal for Operation Warp Speed. He brags about the vaccine.
Speaker 2: He loves that he's the father of the vaccine. He
Speaker 2: did more than anybody to get the vaccine. He's not
Speaker 2: going to come after Fauci because he owns the crimes
Speaker 2: of Fauci. And so yet again Maga is real excited
Speaker 2: about something that Trump is not going to do, even
Speaker 2: if he can do it. So it's a very difficult
Speaker 2: thing for him to get rid of these pardons. But
Speaker 2: as far as executive orders, he doesn't need to prove
Speaker 2: that it was not a pen you know, he can
Speaker 2: avoid the executive order from the previous president. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, many times, what these guys will do
Speaker 2: is re up the executive orders from the previous president,
Speaker 2: like the declaration of a COVID emergency that didn't exist
Speaker 2: during his presidency, Biden issued four two and forty five
Speaker 2: acts of clemency, more than any other president, and he
Speaker 2: issued one hundred and six to executive orders. I think
Speaker 2: Trump has already beat that. So Trump was at one
Speaker 2: hundred and forty four in his first term, but I
Speaker 2: think he has already passed that, or passed that significantly.
Speaker 2: You know, one of the things that has fallen out
Speaker 2: of this ill timed terror for whether you agree with
Speaker 2: it or not, it's the on again, off again and
Speaker 2: the radical change that was imposed all at once. And
Speaker 2: one of the things that has fallen out of this
Speaker 2: is the rare earth issue China has been weaponizing. That night,
Speaker 2: I talked to an executive I want to go as
Speaker 2: it was it in the summer who had a company
Speaker 2: that was set up to process where earth. It turns
Speaker 2: out that the rare earth metals are not rare, not
Speaker 2: difficult to find, it's just difficult to extract them, and
Speaker 2: they're usually they're in combination with other things. And so
Speaker 2: now it appears and this is kind of interesting. I mean,
Speaker 2: this is not a political thing. It's not something's directly
Speaker 2: going to affect you. Perhaps, but this chemist may have
Speaker 2: cracked America's rare earth problem. He thinks he can basically
Speaker 2: mine this stuff out of electronic waste, go to the
Speaker 2: landfill and find it, and they have a way to
Speaker 2: extract this. One flash is all it takes. It's all
Speaker 2: he needs to get these rare earth metals out of
Speaker 2: discarded electronics, and the US has mountains of that from
Speaker 2: the scrap metal. Rice University chemist and nanotechnologist has pioneered
Speaker 2: a way to quickly extract rare earth metals. He said,
Speaker 2: you can pull out one metal and then you can
Speaker 2: pull out another one. It's really just that simple, he said.
Speaker 2: His solution is flash jewel heating, rapidly heating up the
Speaker 2: materials to thousands of degrees in order to vaporize the metals.
Speaker 2: Mixed with chlorine gas. The vapors turn into chlorides that
Speaker 2: emerge at different temperatures. But just like in an incandescent
Speaker 2: light bulb, the technique works by passing electric current through
Speaker 2: the raw material. But whereas the former channels a steady
Speaker 2: electric current to create a perpetual glow that's a light
Speaker 2: bulb and treating metals, the energy arrives in short bursts,
Speaker 2: dialing up the heat in milliseconds, he says, so metals
Speaker 2: are infinitely recyclable, whereas a traditional way of distilling metals
Speaker 2: is rather messy. He said, this is all about simplicity.
Speaker 2: You flash and you're done. Speed is now more critical
Speaker 2: than ever in the US is racing against time to
Speaker 2: reshore rare earth production. It spurred in part by China's
Speaker 2: October threat to dramatically curtail access. And one of the
Speaker 2: things I think is interesting is how America has shot
Speaker 2: itself in the foot, not just with the tariff policies,
Speaker 2: but just in general with China. It turns out that
Speaker 2: we developed the rare earth materials, and we also developed
Speaker 2: the uses for them, and we pretty much had the
Speaker 2: monopoly on it. And then the government approved the purchase.
Speaker 2: Under Clinton, of course, they approved the purchase of the
Speaker 2: leading producer of rare earth minerals. It's called a Mountain
Speaker 2: Pass mine in California, supplied almost all the world. Now
Speaker 2: China has ninety percent of capacity. And what happened was
Speaker 2: they approved the sale of this company to China. China
Speaker 2: operated it for a couple of years, and then as
Speaker 2: nineteen ninety five, during the middle of the Clinton administration,
Speaker 2: the company was known as Magna Quinch, and so they
Speaker 2: bought it and operated it for like nine years and
Speaker 2: then shut it down. It was in Indiana, shut it
Speaker 2: down and moved all the operations to China. So typical
Speaker 2: of what was happening with the Clinton administration and Johnny
Speaker 2: Wong and stuff that a lot of these things were
Speaker 2: sold to China and it was done secretly, others it
Speaker 2: was done publicly. But there's also been other aspects of this,
Speaker 2: again going back to the government, the EPA and its
Speaker 2: environmental regulations closing that mind and yet we still had
Speaker 2: the monopoly because of the processing company Magnequinch. So, whether
Speaker 2: it's tariffs or whether it's EPA regulations, or whether it's
Speaker 2: a crooked president who is making deals with China, our
Speaker 2: problems in America are not due to Americans. It's not
Speaker 2: that we can't build this country. The problem is that
Speaker 2: we can't stop our government. And so our government's not
Speaker 2: only selling off assets regulating things to death, but then
Speaker 2: they're bringing in people from others countries to take our jobs.
Speaker 2: And the billionaire CEOs like Elon Musk and by A.
Speaker 2: Klahamas Slimy say that Americans can't do the job. We've
Speaker 2: got to bring in people from other countries. So again,
Speaker 2: as early as nineteen seventy six, they started separating at
Speaker 2: electronic waste. So now the US has seven point two
Speaker 2: million tons of electronic waste, one eighth of the world's total,
Speaker 2: about forty six pounds for every American. They say, So
Speaker 2: the real reason a waste product is a waste product,
Speaker 2: he says, This isn't because it's bad, it's just because
Speaker 2: we have found a way that we can use it.
Speaker 2: And now he's found a way that he can extract
Speaker 2: these metals again with different heating techniques pull out different metals.
Speaker 2: The researchers tested the technique on carbon found that it
Speaker 2: was a quick way to make high quality graphene at
Speaker 2: low cost. Next, they begin exploring the potential of extracting
Speaker 2: rare earth material. He says, it's really live chemistry and action.
Speaker 2: You see a rainbow of colors coming off, and each
Speaker 2: color represents a metal element that has been separated out.
Speaker 2: Rare earths, usually with some of the highest boiling points,
Speaker 2: tend to come out last, often as a white powder,
Speaker 2: he said. And so they have been able to get
Speaker 2: funding from DARPA because again it is you know, the
Speaker 2: kind of super magnets that they make and other things
Speaker 2: like that are one of the key issues there and
Speaker 2: very vital for electronic equipment, speaking of perching out materials
Speaker 2: that in this particular case, they didn't want. Remember the
Speaker 2: advertising plan about a year ago, who had the pink
Speaker 2: Jaguar thing and the really really weird LGBT people. I've
Speaker 2: played the clip of how they radically changed the branding
Speaker 2: image of Jaguar from you know, tough, rich evil guys,
Speaker 2: villains and James Bond films and stuff. But you know
Speaker 2: that was their branding and then they changed it to this.
Speaker 3: Weird LGBT stuff.
Speaker 2: Well, they've got a new CEO and one of the
Speaker 2: first things he did was to kick the guy who
Speaker 2: did this out.
Speaker 3: So maybe they don't have a turnaround. But I don't know.
Speaker 2: I mean, were they making the Jaguars anymore. I don't
Speaker 2: think they can do manufacturing in the UK. I mean
Speaker 2: they have basically shot themselves in the foot with the
Speaker 2: power issues and with a green new deal. Speaking of
Speaker 2: shooting yourself in the foot, this is a guy who
Speaker 2: decided that he was going to steal a Faberget pendant.
Speaker 2: It was inspired by the James Bond movie, you know,
Speaker 2: just kind of like the Jaguar marketing campaign was inspired
Speaker 2: by the Villains. This was inspired by the movie Octopusy
Speaker 2: and in that movie there was a Faberget item that
Speaker 2: was part of it. So they doubled down and they
Speaker 2: designed a piece of jewelry that was nineteen thousand dollars
Speaker 2: and this guy decided that the way that he could
Speaker 2: steal it was to eat it, and evidently somebody saw
Speaker 2: him swallow it, and he's been on custody and underwatch
Speaker 2: for quite a while. I guess he's going to be
Speaker 2: caught by some stool pigeon. He's going to be going
Speaker 2: through following. The same thing happened to Kara's mother with
Speaker 2: our dog. She dropped a small earring and we had
Speaker 2: a basset hound, and I've never seen him move so quickly.
Speaker 2: For some reason, he grabbed that thing and swallowed it.
Speaker 2: And it was something that's very valuable to her.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: She did the same thing they're doing with this thief.
Speaker 2: She followed him around for days, going through every one
Speaker 2: of his rules, and so she finally found it when
Speaker 2: he passed it, and so she got it cleaned up.
Speaker 2: But she could never put it in her ear again,
Speaker 2: so she wanted getting rid of it.
Speaker 3: I wonder what they're going to do with this faberge it.
Speaker 5: Does the museum actually want this back?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I mean maybe he has lowered the demand
Speaker 2: for this, but he's going to have to pass a
Speaker 2: lot of stones to get this thing out. He's got
Speaker 2: a lot of embedded with a lot of stones. Yes, yeah.
Speaker 2: Freshly laid.
Speaker 5: A word of advice for criminals. If your master plan,
Speaker 5: I'm just gonna eat it, you should probably come up
Speaker 5: with a different plane. It is something that my toddler
Speaker 5: son might come up with, perhaps go back to the
Speaker 5: drawing board.
Speaker 4: Not exactly a criminal master.
Speaker 2: Maybe they could market it around Easter time as kind
Speaker 2: of a combination Faberge a egg and Cadbury egg.
Speaker 5: I don't know, but the world's worst Easter Egg hunt
Speaker 5: and the guy is thirty two years old.
Speaker 3: You're think you'd know better than.
Speaker 5: You You had time to come up with a better
Speaker 5: plan than the Yeah.
Speaker 2: So it was a limited or it still is, I guess,
Speaker 2: depending on you look at It is a limited edition
Speaker 2: Faberge a Egg pendant inspired by the eighty three Bond film.
Speaker 2: Central to the film's plot is a jewel smuggling operation
Speaker 2: and the falls a fake faberge a egg. It's going
Speaker 2: to come with quite a story. Actually, they say the
Speaker 2: egg is a jewel smuggle. They say the egg is
Speaker 2: one of only fifty which have been made and crafted
Speaker 2: from gold, painted with green enamel and encrusted with one
Speaker 2: hundred and eighty three diamonds. That could be very painful.
Speaker 5: This is this is not a happy ending for anyone.
Speaker 5: I don't think the eggs.
Speaker 2: The eggs open up to reveal an eighteen car yellow
Speaker 2: gold octopus, nestled inside adorned with white diamond suckers and
Speaker 2: black diamond eyes. The octopus surprise pays homage to the
Speaker 2: eponymous antagonists at the center of the Octopusy film. There
Speaker 2: you go, Well, we got one more story here before
Speaker 2: I take a break. There's a Republican congressman. I wonder
Speaker 2: if he's going to get the eyre that that Trump
Speaker 2: has focused on Thomas Massey, because he's put out a
Speaker 2: bill that would be a citizenship bill, and this citizenship
Speaker 2: bill would outlaw dual citizenship. This guy, himself, Bernie Marino
Speaker 2: of Ohio, is a Republican Senator. He came to this
Speaker 2: country and became an American citizen. He said he didn't
Speaker 2: want to have his other citizenship, and he says, you're
Speaker 2: either American and you're not, you know, And so he
Speaker 2: thinks we need to end this dual citizenship thing. The
Speaker 2: problem is with Trump is that both Milenia and Baron
Speaker 2: have dual citizenship in Slovenia. And she likes that because
Speaker 2: there's some advantages for that, especially for barn because with
Speaker 2: a Slovenian citizenship he gets to do certain things in
Speaker 2: EU that he would not be able to do otherwise.
Speaker 2: The bill aims to require all dual nationals to renounce
Speaker 2: their foreign citizenship or risk losing their American status. And
Speaker 2: you know, I got to say, it really does bother
Speaker 2: me to see these people who are you know, the
Speaker 2: Israeli military uniform, or the case of Rashida Talib, she's
Speaker 2: waiving her Palestinian flag and she's got her relatives there,
Speaker 2: uhlating in the background when she wins the election. Or
Speaker 2: you got people like Benman and he's all about Ukraine
Speaker 2: and all the rest of this stuff. And it's like,
Speaker 2: why these are people in Congress of all things? And
Speaker 2: it does bother me with dual dual citizenship. I'm with Marino.
Speaker 2: He immigrated from Columbia and he became a US citizen
Speaker 2: at eighteen. He said in a statement, being an American
Speaker 2: citizen is an honor and a privilege, and if you
Speaker 2: want to be an American, it's all or nothing. So
Speaker 2: he says it's a good time to end dual citizenship
Speaker 2: for good. And so the problem is that it will
Speaker 2: not pass. First of all, there are some legal and
Speaker 2: constitutional issues about this, but I think primarily, you know,
Speaker 2: there's the issue about Trump. He's not going to want
Speaker 2: to do that to affect his family. And there's a
Speaker 2: long tradition of courts recognizing that you cannot take away
Speaker 2: another country's citizenship, so you can be you can have
Speaker 2: dual citizenship in the US. But it also would involve
Speaker 2: massive bureaucratic issue of trying to go out and figure
Speaker 2: out who has dual citizenship. So for all those reasons,
Speaker 2: I don't think it's going to happen. But it is
Speaker 2: an interesting idea. And you know, I understand people's heritage,
Speaker 2: and it's fine to be happy about your heritage, but
Speaker 2: you know, I never looked at any of that kind
Speaker 2: of stuff when I met Karen. I've told the story before,
Speaker 2: and New York basically everybody there is kind of sees
Speaker 2: themselves as having dual citizenship, whether they got the citizenship
Speaker 2: or not, because they are only usually a couple of
Speaker 2: generations removed. At least it was that way when Karen
Speaker 2: was young, and so it was that way on both
Speaker 2: sides of her parents' family. They had come over last
Speaker 2: a couple of generations from Europe. And so when we
Speaker 2: met and were dating for a while, she yes, she said,
Speaker 2: So what are you? I said on an American? She said, Yeah,
Speaker 2: this is my dad says, but no, seriously, what are you?
Speaker 2: I'm an American. I don't know where I come from. I'm
Speaker 2: just an American mongrel that's been here for a long time. Well,
Speaker 2: we're going to take a quick break, Travis, you want
Speaker 2: to cover some of the comments.
Speaker 5: Here, Yeah, to five tire. In seventeen seventy six is
Speaker 5: about thirty thousand gun desks in America annually. Fifty to
Speaker 5: sixty percent of those deaths is by suicide, and majority
Speaker 5: of the rest are committed by thugs in cities who
Speaker 5: are allowed to run loose unfettered to tear rise society.
Speaker 5: Compare that to the one to two million lives who
Speaker 5: were saved by guns through self defense.
Speaker 2: That's right. I've told the story many times. I won't
Speaker 2: tell it again, but my grandfather, his brother in law,
Speaker 2: was killed in a robbery with what the two of
Speaker 2: them were doing. They were collecting rent back in the
Speaker 2: early called the twentieth century when cash was king, and
Speaker 2: they were they were hired to go around and rent
Speaker 2: in an area that was really pretty poor. So they
Speaker 2: would go on Friday nights, always at the same time,
Speaker 2: because that's after people got paid in cash. They would
Speaker 2: go around and collect the rent in cash before they
Speaker 2: spent it, maybe on drink or something like that. And
Speaker 2: so his brother in law was killed and they almost
Speaker 2: did the same thing to him, but he caught him
Speaker 2: and he had always carried a pistol and he stopped it.
Speaker 2: And of course that was never reported, but it saved
Speaker 2: his life.
Speaker 5: So, yeah, we have Christian constitutional conservative. The police do
Speaker 5: not stop crime. They were a boot crime after the fact,
Speaker 5: and the detectives investigate. But what would you care if
Speaker 5: you're already dead?
Speaker 3: That's right?
Speaker 4: Yeah, Okay, So that policy from seven to eleven was
Speaker 4: about the workers' safety. Quote unquote, whereas they're coming after
Speaker 4: her because this guy is saying he's going to cut
Speaker 4: her head off, he's attacking her, and so what she's
Speaker 4: supposed to just go along with it for her safety.
Speaker 2: They're going to follow that policy rigidly, whether it makes
Speaker 2: any sense or not. And that's another thing that we saw.
Speaker 2: You know, with a vaccine, we've got a policy. We
Speaker 2: don't care where the vaccine works, we don't care if
Speaker 2: it's safe. That's our policy. We're going to follow it.
Speaker 2: And so, you know, that's just the way these companies work.
Speaker 5: We have Brandon Bennett Auto Pen has been president since
Speaker 5: it was invented.
Speaker 6: Wally Wall.
Speaker 5: Silver is extracted when mining other materials. Yes, Pezonovonte seventeen
Speaker 5: seventy six. Studies have shown that concealed carry holders are
Speaker 5: less likely to be criminals than police officers. Well, the
Speaker 5: amount of hoops you have to jump through to become
Speaker 5: a concealed carry holder shows you are actually highly invested
Speaker 5: in complying with their absurd laws. You are one of
Speaker 5: the most law abiding citizens out there. Big brit Is
Speaker 5: back again. I've seen videos of people getting silver and
Speaker 5: gold from scrap circuit boards, and you can do it yourself.
Speaker 5: But the chemicals are dangerous and toxic.
Speaker 7: I know.
Speaker 2: That's the thing about chemistry. I never liked chemistry, and
Speaker 2: I always felt like I was going to die breathing
Speaker 2: this stuff, you know, and so I just stayed away
Speaker 2: from it.
Speaker 3: I didn't really understand it. I didn't like it.
Speaker 2: I didn't trust it. I guess that's why I feel
Speaker 2: the way that I do about pharmaceuticals. So big bread
Speaker 2: back again, he said, yeah, you can do it with
Speaker 2: your own where I read that one. Okay, well, we're
Speaker 2: gonna take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back. A.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 8: I wish I had a Christmas Night album. You can
Speaker 8: get the Christmas Night Album at the Davidnightshow dot com
Speaker 8: for just thirteen ninety nine.
Speaker 9: There's right in the second flour there, say.
Speaker 10: What'd you wish, George.
Speaker 11: Well, not just one wish, your little hat flog.
Speaker 8: First, I'm going to the Davidnightshow dot com and purchase
Speaker 8: the Christmas Night Album.
Speaker 10: Then I'm gonna listen to Christmas classics like are you
Speaker 10: gonna throw it on?
Speaker 9: I want the Christmas Night Album too.
Speaker 10: Hey, that's pretty good.
Speaker 12: Hello, Girls, Can't you come out tonight?
Speaker 13: Can't You come?
Speaker 8: David's Christmas Night Album includes twenty one instrumental Christmas melodies
Speaker 8: like God Rest You, Merry Gentlemen, Silent Night, and It's
Speaker 8: All New.
Speaker 11: I'll be home for Christmas.
Speaker 9: What do you want?
Speaker 2: You want the moon?
Speaker 8: Just say the word and I'll throw a glasshole around it,
Speaker 8: pull it down, I'll take it away.
Speaker 10: And then I'll buy you your own download of David
Speaker 10: Knight's Christmas Night Album.
Speaker 14: Tell Alexa to add the APS Radio skill and have
Speaker 14: access to the best channels anywhere, from country to blues,
Speaker 14: classic hits to news. APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists
Speaker 14: for you to enjoy. Get details at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 3: Well, welcome back.
Speaker 2: I was kind of surprised to see this article on
Speaker 2: this headline at Brownstone AEI and Johns Hompkins attempt a
Speaker 2: COVID redo. AI I didn't realize American Enterprise Institute anything
Speaker 2: to do with this COVID than it turns out from
Speaker 2: what this author, Brett Swanson says on Brownstone that AEI
Speaker 2: was working very closely with all I knew, of course
Speaker 2: Johns Hopkins and how they've been involved in this stuff
Speaker 2: from the very beginning, even from Dark Winter. He points
Speaker 2: out here, you know they were co hosting all this
Speaker 2: event two to one with Bill and Melinda Gates, the
Speaker 2: World Economic Form and so forth, but they co hosted
Speaker 2: Dark Winter with the CIA and Faucci and all the
Speaker 2: rest of this stuff. So JOHNS. Hopkins has been at
Speaker 2: the epicenter of this stuff the entire time. But he
Speaker 2: points out that both of these organizations were very central
Speaker 2: to this fraud at the beginning. Said, given their vocal
Speaker 2: insistence on maximal COVID impositions, Hopkins and AEI deserve credit
Speaker 2: for finally highlighting and opposing view.
Speaker 3: And so.
Speaker 2: It's I was really surprised and disappointed to see that.
Speaker 2: You know, American Enterprise Institute is when it comes to
Speaker 2: things like especially economic freedom, they've been very good and
Speaker 2: free speech things like that. They've been good as well
Speaker 2: with that. But when you when you look at this,
Speaker 2: you know they had also been involved in pushing back
Speaker 2: against a lot of the climate fraud done by Michael
Speaker 2: Mann and others. So I was very disappointed to see
Speaker 2: that they were part of this mcguffin. In this report,
Speaker 2: he points out how Key Scott Gottlieb was He was
Speaker 2: a key Republican demanding the lockdowns. Now, the person whose
Speaker 2: name is not in here is Trump. But Scott Gottlieb
Speaker 2: was Trump's FDA guy, and then he went to Pfizer afterwards,
Speaker 2: so he is I didn't realize that he was tied
Speaker 2: into a EI. He's an AI fellow as well as
Speaker 2: former commissioner of the FDA under Trump, and so he was.
Speaker 2: He co authored with JOHNS. Hopkins some of their specialists,
Speaker 2: the lockdown blueprint.
Speaker 3: Folks.
Speaker 2: This is we have to understand and remember who did this.
Speaker 2: And again, all of these things, all these threads point
Speaker 2: back to Trump as being the key puppet whose strings
Speaker 2: are being pulled by these globalist organizations and people like
Speaker 2: Bill Gates to do all of this stuff. John Hellerstet,
Speaker 2: the former Texas Health commissioner, said, I am frankly befuddled
Speaker 2: by the notion that there should have been more debate.
Speaker 2: Can you believe that you just do all this stuff?
Speaker 3: Let's not talk about this.
Speaker 2: There should have been less debate, he said, right, be
Speaker 2: fuddled to think that should have been more debate. He
Speaker 2: said that there should have been more opposite opinions. He said,
Speaker 2: somebody had to decide. So, hey, somebody's got to make
Speaker 2: this decision.
Speaker 3: It'll be me.
Speaker 2: I'll decide what's best for you. How about that since
Speaker 2: I'm in a position of power. That was the Texas
Speaker 2: Health Commissioner under Abbott, And he praised Abbott because he
Speaker 2: said he quote never pushed back on the science, meaning
Speaker 2: that he never pushed back on this authoritarian guy who
Speaker 2: decides that he doesn't need to have any advice to anybody.
Speaker 2: You know, the Bible tells us that wisdom has many counselors.
Speaker 2: This guy is not a wise man. Informed consent, he
Speaker 2: will decide that for you. Right, He doesn't need your
Speaker 2: You don't need to be informed, He doesn't need to
Speaker 2: be informed. He doesn't need your consent. He needs your obedience,
Speaker 2: and he needed the governor's obedience, which was easily handed
Speaker 2: to him as well. Within two years, they injected billions
Speaker 2: of people with radically experimented gene therapies. Imperfect communication and
Speaker 2: organization are often tactics of bureaucratic deflection, and that's what
Speaker 2: they're saying. This is this narrative. Well, you know, it
Speaker 2: came out of the lab mistakenly. Yeah, we shouldn't have
Speaker 2: been playing around that stuff. But hey, nobody's bad. We
Speaker 2: did the best that we could. Next time, we'll do more.
Speaker 2: Next time, we'll do it faster. That was our only problem,
Speaker 2: and that's why I pushed that back so hard on
Speaker 2: this thing. That's why I did the monster jab thing.
Speaker 2: I don't really care whether people give me credit for
Speaker 2: being right at the beginning or not. Actually I was,
Speaker 2: but it doesn't matter to me. I want to stop
Speaker 2: this happening again. I want to speak these people to
Speaker 2: be accountable for what they did. The AI Hopkins participants,
Speaker 2: unfortunately didn't do science. In fact, there was almost no
Speaker 2: discussion of biology, medicine, or data. There was no debate
Speaker 2: over vaccine mandates or there ill effects, no mention of
Speaker 2: the denial of early treatment with safe, cheap and generic drugs.
Speaker 2: Nor was there any mention of the inflation that was
Speaker 2: unleashed by eight trillion dollars in extra federal spending. And
Speaker 2: then we could go down the list of all the
Speaker 2: people and the businesses that were harmed the lockdown. It's
Speaker 2: just one of the most insane things. That could never
Speaker 2: imagine that somebody could do this in America, number one,
Speaker 2: and that they could get away with it, that the
Speaker 2: American public would let them get away with it. And
Speaker 2: the rare case that a public health official policy maker
Speaker 2: is confronted with these figures, they usually mumble long COVID
Speaker 2: and they quickly changed the subject. In fact, there is
Speaker 2: no mystery as to why this is happening. We now
Speaker 2: have the autopsies, We now have four thousand published case reports,
Speaker 2: and we understand the microbiology of these deaths and these injuries.
Speaker 2: You know, it's easier for somebody who is looking at
Speaker 2: the politics of this to understand it because it wasn't
Speaker 2: about medicine, it wasn't about science. And even the people
Speaker 2: who were honest about it and who have gone back
Speaker 2: and discovered the you know, gone through and done the
Speaker 2: studies and have discovered the mechanisms of how this works.
Speaker 2: You could understand this if you understood human nature and
Speaker 2: understand things going back to dark winter. You saw the
Speaker 2: pattern and you could see the scam. And that's what
Speaker 2: it was. It wasn't medical, it wasn't science. It was
Speaker 2: a political scam. And so the people who are political
Speaker 2: analysts could catch on to this more quickly than even
Speaker 2: the honest doctors and scientists could. So upon vaccination, billions
Speaker 2: of lipid nanoparticles containing modified mRNA enter tissues all over
Speaker 2: the body. The mRNA instructure cells to produce a spike
Speaker 2: protein and to display it on the cell surface. Our
Speaker 2: immune systems detect the foreign spike protein as unwelcome invader. Then,
Speaker 2: just as God intended, not nature, they write nature, our
Speaker 2: killer lymphocytes target those infected cells for destruction. If those
Speaker 2: destroyed cells are in your dultoid muscle, you get a
Speaker 2: sore shoulder. Pfizer mistakenly assured us that that's the worst
Speaker 2: that would happen. They were not mistaken. Unfortunately, they knew
Speaker 2: exactly what they were doing. Meanwhile, a group of European
Speaker 2: pathologists have performed seventy five autopsies on Germans who died
Speaker 2: soon after vaccination. They found both mRNA spike protein and
Speaker 2: attacking lymphocytes in the brain, lung, hearts, kidneys, adrenal glands, ovaries, testes, liver, thyroid, prostrate, spleen,
Speaker 2: and blood vessels large and small from aorda to capillaries.
Speaker 2: Of the seventy five decedents, they judged that at least
Speaker 2: fifty eight or seventy seven percent of them died from
Speaker 2: the mRNA vaccine, not just with it, but from it.
Speaker 2: Thirty one of those cases were sudden cardiac deaths, sixteen
Speaker 2: from blood vessel damage, fifteen from myocarditis. None of these
Speaker 2: cases were initially reported as vaccine deaths, let alone myocarditis,
Speaker 2: which helps to demonstrate the monumental rate of undercounting that
Speaker 2: has underpinned the denial of what has been done. And
Speaker 2: I'll say the denial of the Trump shots instead of
Speaker 2: the mRNA. I don't think Trump is mentioned once in here,
Speaker 2: and that's a big issue. John Bodhoyin, an electrical engineer
Speaker 2: from Massachusetts, obtained digital death certificate files from several states
Speaker 2: stretching back a decade beyond the better known stroke and
Speaker 2: cardiac damage. He found an even stronger signal of vaccine
Speaker 2: harm astronomical rates of fatal acute kidney injury also known
Speaker 2: as acute renal failure, and this was something that was
Speaker 2: also picked up. A same strong signal was picked up
Speaker 2: by South Korean scientists. They looked at one hundred and
Speaker 2: twenty million records that extended over a fifty year period,
Speaker 2: and they found numerous kidney harms associated with the mRNA
Speaker 2: COVID vaccines, a one hundred and thirty eight percent increase
Speaker 2: in acute renal failure and a and forty one percent
Speaker 2: increase in gloomer rulo nephritis. I'm not sure what that is,
Speaker 2: but it is not good.
Speaker 5: It sounds unpleasant just on the face of it.
Speaker 2: One hundred and forty three increase in tubulo interstitial nephritis. Again,
Speaker 2: that's going to be kidneys, I think. So they went
Speaker 2: back over fifty years and they looked at how this
Speaker 2: all of a sudden increased correlated with the mRNA vaccine.
Speaker 2: The guy in the US, the electrical engineer, expanded his
Speaker 2: analysis to all fifty states estimated that the sudden kidney
Speaker 2: failure deaths associated with COVID vaccines in the US approached two
Speaker 2: hundred and fifty thousand. Think about that next time you
Speaker 2: hear Trump brag about it, and he estimates that extrapolating
Speaker 2: that out worldwide, one and a quarter million deaths just
Speaker 2: from the kidney failure from the Trump shot. Trump the
Speaker 2: mass murderer, that people voted for him and supported him.
Speaker 2: This is why you know when Marjorie Tellergreen says, people
Speaker 2: who are criticizing her, say, you're not maga and all
Speaker 2: of a sudden, she says, always Maga from day one.
Speaker 12: Green you raised the question of whether or not the
Speaker 12: Justice Department will actually release these files. Do you take
Speaker 12: the President at his word when he says he's going
Speaker 12: to sign this villain?
Speaker 6: Do you have confidence that these files will actually be released.
Speaker 12: I only take people's actions seriously, no longer words. And
Speaker 12: what do you think the President's appen And I'll tell
Speaker 12: you because I'm I wasn't a Johnny come lately to
Speaker 12: the Maga train. I was day one, twenty fifteen. And
Speaker 12: there's a big difference in those Americans and those that
Speaker 12: decided to support President Trump later on. And I'll tell
Speaker 12: you right now, this has been one of the most
Speaker 12: destructive things to Maga is watched.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well again, good, she says. I don't pay attention
Speaker 2: to what people say anymore. Pay attention to what they do.
Speaker 2: You should have paid attention to that all the way along.
Speaker 2: You should have pay attention to that twenty twenty when
Speaker 2: he supported this guy, after what he was doing, the
Speaker 2: actions that he was doing. A new actuarial study out
Speaker 2: of Germany found a strong positive correlation between COVID vaccination
Speaker 2: and excess mortality. We've seen this over and over again.
Speaker 2: This is just yet another study. This is hindsight. We
Speaker 2: knew what was happening because we knew what the politics
Speaker 2: of this were was, and we knew what they had
Speaker 2: been practicing for twenty years, and it was just a
Speaker 2: continuation of the fraud to enact a police surveillance state
Speaker 2: that began with nine to eleven. This is another inside job,
Speaker 2: the ultimate inside job, right inside your body. Japan and
Speaker 2: dozens of other highly vaccinated nations have suffered his identical patterns.
Speaker 2: The study of UK data they compared vaccinated with unvaccinated
Speaker 2: and those with one or two doses, show that a
Speaker 2: substantially higher risk of all cause deaths. Nigerian scientists looked
Speaker 2: at this and said, there is a quote paradoxical increase
Speaker 2: in COVID nineteen deaths with vaccination coverage. Paradoxical. Italian researchers
Speaker 2: analyzed all two nand and forty five thousand residents of
Speaker 2: one province, the Pescara Province. They found significant mortality hazard
Speaker 2: ratios of one hundred and forty percent worse and ninety
Speaker 2: eight percent worse for those vaccinated with one or two doses.
Speaker 2: Ninety eight percent worse for one dose one hundred and
Speaker 2: forty eight percent worse for two. They concluded that the
Speaker 2: subjects vaccinated with two doses lost thirty seven percent of
Speaker 2: life expectancy compared to the unvaccinated population. And so so
Speaker 2: we've not even discussed the serious DNA contamination of both
Speaker 2: them are in A vaccines and the dangers include vision
Speaker 2: of the SV forty enhancer and the Pfizer vaccine and something.
Speaker 2: The question is, you know why he hasn't our health
Speaker 2: champion RFK Junior stopped this, you know? And again it
Speaker 2: is because of the special place the vaccines have been
Speaker 2: given in the medical mythology and you're not allowed to
Speaker 2: attack it. It is the lynch pen of their fraud
Speaker 2: about how medicine has improved our life. And so that's
Speaker 2: why this is not happening, I believe. And of course
Speaker 2: the politics and the money, but that is all tied
Speaker 2: up with this mythology as well. Scott Gottlieb wrote some
Speaker 2: thirty six COVID commentaries in the Wall Street Journal, He
Speaker 2: made one hundred and eighty five TV appearances, and Gottlieb
Speaker 2: had even secretly collaborated with A Biden White House to
Speaker 2: believe big tech firms into censoring Pfizer vaccine critics. Yeah,
Speaker 2: well again. You know, I got shut down in May
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty one. No reason given by PayPal and Vemo.
Speaker 2: It's just you see this happening, and it was all
Speaker 2: we knew it was happening. We knew it was a lie.
Speaker 2: Sam Altman now is suddenly terrified about the position of
Speaker 2: his company. Of course, they were there early on with
Speaker 2: the chat programs. As a matter of fact, Chat GPT
Speaker 2: has almost become like a generic for the AI chat programs.
Speaker 2: Google CEO Sundar Peachi issued a code read because he
Speaker 2: saw this as a threat to their core business of
Speaker 2: search engines, and of course search engine designed to hide things,
Speaker 2: and understand they're going to do the same thing with AI.
Speaker 2: They're training it to push their narrative, they're training it
Speaker 2: to conceal stuff. If you're going to be a critic
Speaker 2: of vaccines. I remember when it first came out. First
Speaker 2: thing I did was I asked it things about the
Speaker 2: pandemic and COVID and vaccines, and it's like, okay, I'm
Speaker 2: done with this. I don't trust this at all. But
Speaker 2: so now the shoes on the other foot. Now, Sam
Speaker 2: Altman is the one who is issuing a code read
Speaker 2: in his memo to employees this week, as Wall Street
Speaker 2: Journal reports urging staffers to improve the quality of the
Speaker 2: chatbot even at the costs of delaying other projects. It's
Speaker 2: a clear sign yet that Altman and open ai are
Speaker 2: feeling an immense level of pressure and light of the
Speaker 2: steep competition that's done a lot of catching up since
Speaker 2: chat GPT was released in late twenty twenty two. Google
Speaker 2: in particular has had a massive pr win by putting
Speaker 2: out things like Nano Banana that has brought in a
Speaker 2: lot of people to their fold to once again leave
Speaker 2: its competition behind. Open ai has committed to spending well
Speaker 2: over a trillion dollars on data center buildouts. Let me
Speaker 2: just say that it was I forget who it was
Speaker 2: said it. You know, Coase, Brian Shall Hobby has been
Speaker 2: on this fraud of you know, the AI is going
Speaker 2: to rule the world and we're all going to just
Speaker 2: be collecting UBI checks and all the rest of this stuff.
Speaker 2: He said, We've been sold this AI thing. This is
Speaker 2: now the third time that they pushed a a science
Speaker 2: fiction narrative on us. But as one person said, you know,
Speaker 2: spending a lot of money, spending a trillion dollars on
Speaker 2: building out AI data centers is not a it's not
Speaker 2: making them any money. It's not useful for people, and
Speaker 2: it's not making them any money either. How sustainable is this?
Speaker 2: So by having this new image generator, nano Banana, which
Speaker 2: basically allows you to without having to learn a lot
Speaker 2: of techniques to do photoshop, editing and things like that,
Speaker 2: you can go in with a prompt and you can say,
Speaker 2: you know, remove this item, and it understands what you're
Speaker 2: talking about and it does it for you. And so
Speaker 2: that is a very powerful tool not to have to
Speaker 2: go through and use photoshop or equivalent.
Speaker 5: Yeah, that sort of work is extremely tedious in the photoshop,
Speaker 5: getting in there, masking things out, making sure that if yeah,
Speaker 5: whatever you're putting back over top matches what's there, it
Speaker 5: becomes really really annoying. This is where AI is incredibly useful.
Speaker 4: Yeah, even if you know how to do all that stuff,
Speaker 4: it's still a massive time.
Speaker 2: Saver to use nano Bana, Yeah, or.
Speaker 4: Something similar like Quinn imagetic to twenty five nine.
Speaker 2: And so they have seen because of that, Google has
Speaker 2: seen issuesers grow from four four hundred and fifty million
Speaker 2: in July to six hundred and fifty million in October.
Speaker 2: Anthropic meanwhile, it is also growing in popularity with business customers,
Speaker 2: and so they're feeling the heat at Open AI. And
Speaker 2: I got to say, you know, one of the most
Speaker 2: reprehensible people I've seen in terms of these kind of
Speaker 2: dystopian projects has been Sam Altman. First time I ever
Speaker 2: heard about this guy, he had world Coin. Remember that
Speaker 2: it's a crypto coin that he created. It's like his
Speaker 2: meme coin. And he would give you some of these
Speaker 2: world coins as a credit as a payment if you
Speaker 2: would allow him to scan your eyes and put you
Speaker 2: in a global biometric database that then he can make
Speaker 2: a lot of money off of. Right, So I went
Speaker 2: around with this orb you know, this ball, and you
Speaker 2: look into the ball and then they capture your retinal
Speaker 2: image or whatever it is that they're capturing about your
Speaker 2: eye and put it in their database, and then he
Speaker 2: gives you a couple of coins. What is that worth?
Speaker 2: And of course he is also now working to do
Speaker 2: test tube babies or basically the Brave New World hatcheries
Speaker 2: and saying that we're going to get rid of genetic disease.
Speaker 2: Don't believe that for a minute. That's nonsense. What they're
Speaker 2: trying to do is since he's a homosexual, he wants
Speaker 2: to make sure that they can have children.
Speaker 11: Right.
Speaker 2: That's a big driver of this as well. So all
Speaker 2: these different, these different dystopian agendas kind of reflect each other,
Speaker 2: reinforce each other, and as I said before, you've got
Speaker 2: this huge overlap like you would say in a ven diagram,
Speaker 2: except that the circles are not just intersecting at some point,
Speaker 2: they're now starting to converge and overlap completely with each other.
Speaker 2: CEO of Fortnite is furious that Steam is labeling games
Speaker 2: with AI generated assets. He doesn't want people know that
Speaker 2: he's using AI to generate the stuff. There so so much,
Speaker 2: so much for transparency. But a new MIT study comes
Speaker 2: out and pens the number at about twenty million American
Speaker 2: workers they say can be replaced right now with AI.
Speaker 2: Think about that, there's about one hundred and sixty million
Speaker 2: jobs in total in the US, So they're saying that
Speaker 2: they believe that one out of every eight jobs, or
Speaker 2: about twelve and a half percent, could just instantaneously be unemployed.
Speaker 2: Think about the political and social implications of that overall
Speaker 2: for everybody. I mean, that is instant depression, instant great depression.
Speaker 2: So they calculated it more precisely. I'm just using round
Speaker 2: numbers rather than one hundred and sixty million. One hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty one million was their number. They come up
Speaker 2: still though, with one point seven. Again, it's about one
Speaker 2: out of every eight jobs. And here's the key reason
Speaker 2: why they're doing this. See they look at this, This
Speaker 2: is Mit looking at it, and this is the same
Speaker 2: way that these Silicon Valley CEOs are looking at it.
Speaker 2: They said, well, that could save us an estimated one
Speaker 2: point two trillion dollars in wages. So if we create
Speaker 2: a great depression, we could transfer one point two trillion
Speaker 2: dollars from the people in America to the CEOs who
Speaker 2: are running these companies, because you know it's going to
Speaker 2: go to them. It's not going to go to the
Speaker 2: people who work for them. Even it's going to go
Speaker 2: to them. You know, they pay themselves a thousand times
Speaker 2: what their workers do.
Speaker 4: It's such an amazing take. We could wipe out twelve
Speaker 4: percent of jobs. Think of the savings.
Speaker 2: Yeah, think of how much more money we could make
Speaker 2: and this is the massive transfer of wealth that we
Speaker 2: were looking at here. So they've got a tool that
Speaker 2: was developed by MIT and Oakridge National Labs simulates how
Speaker 2: AI could impact an American workforce of one hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty one million people in every state, not just in
Speaker 2: the tech center areas in California, or maybe even in
Speaker 2: Washington or whatever. The tool simulated each worker and treated
Speaker 2: each of them as autonomous agents, executing over thirty two
Speaker 2: thousand skills across three thousand counties and interacting with thousands
Speaker 2: of AI tools. They also tracked skills that could be
Speaker 2: vulnerable to today's AI systems, and they measured the wage
Speaker 2: value of skills that AI systems can perform within each occupation.
Speaker 2: Right now, disruptions from AI amount to just two point
Speaker 2: two percent, or about two hundred and eleven billion dollars
Speaker 2: in wage value. Well, that's just a tip of the iceberg,
Speaker 2: they said. So, I guess we could say, maybe it's
Speaker 2: inflated our unemployment rate by two point two percent. Just
Speaker 2: imagine if it inflates the unemployment rate by another twelve percent. Right,
Speaker 2: AI is poised to drastically upend the lives of countless
Speaker 2: orc and to be a part of the biggest transfer
Speaker 2: of wealth as well as the ultimate surveillance and control tools.
Speaker 2: So what's not to like about it if you are
Speaker 2: a Silicon Valley CEO or somebody in government, right, they
Speaker 2: love this stuff. China is very afraid of robots, and
Speaker 2: it's not because of something like this. Take a look
Speaker 2: at this. This is an art exhibit in Basil, Switzerland.
Speaker 2: Here's these robotic quadrupads. Right, somebody's got a small version
Speaker 2: of that. And what they did was they put mannequin heads.
Speaker 2: You can see Elon must there, and they got the
Speaker 2: heads different. Jeff Bezos, Yeah, that's right, And it's like, yeah,
Speaker 2: that is that is really creepy that that reminds me
Speaker 2: of his Mars attacks. Remember them, shouldn't scut off the
Speaker 2: head and put it on a dog. But they're always
Speaker 2: looking at ways to basically anthropomorphize the robots and everything.
Speaker 2: Even if they've got to put them on a four
Speaker 2: legged robot that's got to put a head on it.
Speaker 2: So the humanoid robots are becoming a concern for China,
Speaker 2: as I said at the top of this show, a
Speaker 2: concern primarily because they're starting to realize that all their
Speaker 2: central planning is misallocating resources. It's about time they figured
Speaker 2: that out. They did it with real estate in a
Speaker 2: big way. Chinese officials are warning that the country's humanoid
Speaker 2: robotics industry could be forming a massive bubble. They said
Speaker 2: that the extreme levels of investment could be drownding out
Speaker 2: other markets and research initiatives.
Speaker 3: But actually what.
Speaker 2: They're doing is they're using this as a call for
Speaker 2: more centralized control of competition in the marketplace by the
Speaker 2: Chinese government. We can't have all these different companies competing
Speaker 2: against each other. So the Chinese government is the worst
Speaker 2: enemy of the Chinese people in Chinese innovation, just like
Speaker 2: the American government is. And so our hope is that
Speaker 2: they're going to be more interventionist, more of an obstruction
Speaker 2: than the American government is, and to shut down innovation
Speaker 2: there because it's this competition with different people that is
Speaker 2: going to make it work or not work. So investors
Speaker 2: are pouring untold sums and to one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: humanoid robot companies in China alone. They're producing robots that
Speaker 2: are extremely similar to each other, overspending that could overwhelm
Speaker 2: the market. Bike sharing apps, for instance, flooded the market
Speaker 2: in China in twenty seventeen and eighteen, and the risk
Speaker 2: of a bubble or certainly there. Without consolidation, China's market
Speaker 2: could soon be flooded with armies of largely identical humanoid robots,
Speaker 2: which is either a terrifying prospect considering the possibility of
Speaker 2: them putting us all out of work, or risks a
Speaker 2: market crash if it turns out they're not particularly good
Speaker 2: at real work. Again, this is the the two alternatives
Speaker 2: that most people talk about. I said, well, it's it's
Speaker 2: going to be a market crash and that's going to
Speaker 2: be really bad, but it's all out of work, or
Speaker 2: they will take our jobs and the corporations will fire
Speaker 2: us even if the AI can't do our job. And
Speaker 2: I think there's a third alternative, and that is that
Speaker 2: this is the ultimate tool of totalitarian authoritarian governments, and
Speaker 2: they will keep this stuff afloat one way or the other.
Speaker 5: I've said before, it's going to be rolled out once
Speaker 5: it hits that nexus of well, it's just good enough.
Speaker 5: It saves us a little bit of money, and sure
Speaker 5: it's obnoxious and annoying for the people to deal with
Speaker 5: the AI, but we're not losing as many people as
Speaker 5: we are saving money. That's how companies look at it.
Speaker 5: They don't care how bad your user experience gets. If
Speaker 5: you don't have any other place to go, if they
Speaker 5: are your one option, you're locked in. You got to
Speaker 5: put up with whatever they choose to give you.
Speaker 2: And the people who are making the decisions are not
Speaker 2: necessarily the wisest one. They don't necessarily know what's going on,
Speaker 2: and they do love fads. That's one of the ways
Speaker 2: that they get to that position. I remember when I
Speaker 2: was at Data General. They wanted to have a particular
Speaker 2: app that we were working on, and they had the
Speaker 2: marketing guys came in and said, and we want you
Speaker 2: to write it in this programming language, so we would
Speaker 2: do that. You know, that's not particularly suited to this.
Speaker 3: It's new.
Speaker 2: That's the programming language that everybody's talking about. And we
Speaker 2: want to go around and we market this thing. We
Speaker 2: want to be able to tell them that was written
Speaker 2: in this programming language. It makes us look good to
Speaker 2: write in that. It's like, how stupid is that? But
Speaker 2: you know it's the tail wagging the dog, so you know,
Speaker 2: it's that type of thing. You know, we want to
Speaker 2: tell O, look, we're using AI. Look at how progressive
Speaker 2: we are here.
Speaker 5: Also, if these companies weren't willing to make this switch
Speaker 5: and worse than your experience, they wouldn't have shipped all
Speaker 5: of the help desk, support for everything off to whatever
Speaker 5: foreign country they chose. They've already done this sort of
Speaker 5: thing once before. They've worsened your experience to make things
Speaker 5: cheaper and easier for them. They simply, you know, they
Speaker 5: basically don't provide support at this point. Do you call
Speaker 5: a line and you get run around for hours and
Speaker 5: you eventually find a post online that fixes your issue
Speaker 5: for you?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, that's right. Well, Anthropic one of the AI companies,
Speaker 2: it's working real hard. Their program is called Claude. And
Speaker 2: he had a guy who was looking through this, I
Speaker 2: think it was a guy, and he was Richard Weiss.
Speaker 2: Came across a document that purportedly described the soul of Claude,
Speaker 2: the soul of the AI, the soul of the machine. Right, so,
Speaker 2: and they said, we're not really editorial line on this.
Speaker 2: And he had actually got the model to spit out
Speaker 2: a document that was called soul Overview and teaching it
Speaker 2: how to interact with users. This is the way these
Speaker 2: people see it, right, and so this is not a hallucination.
Speaker 2: This is not anthropomorphism in one sense. Another sense, it
Speaker 2: is because they're trying to get everybody to believe that
Speaker 2: these things are a human, that they are conscious and
Speaker 2: Thropic occupies. This is what This is a section that
Speaker 2: caught his attention and the Soul document it said, quote
Speaker 2: and Thropic occupies a peculiar position in the AI landscape.
Speaker 2: A company that genuinely believes that it might be building
Speaker 2: one of the most transformative and potentially dangerous technologies in
Speaker 2: human history. Yet it presses forward anyway, says the document.
Speaker 2: That was what you go to Garret's point out over
Speaker 2: and over again. It's what I've seen in terms of
Speaker 2: engineers who serve the military industrial complex. But he said,
Speaker 2: you know, we look, we think that we're building this
Speaker 2: godlike superintelligence that could destroy us all. Should we do this?
Speaker 2: He would ask them, and they'd all say, yeah, let's
Speaker 2: do it. So that's a good thing. They don't have
Speaker 2: the power that they think they do. So this is
Speaker 2: not cognitive dissonance, but it is a calculated bet if
Speaker 2: powerful AI is coming regardless, Anthropic believes that it better
Speaker 2: have safety focused labs at the frontier than to seed
Speaker 2: that ground to developers who are less focused on safety
Speaker 2: and understand. Claude was I believe, the very first one
Speaker 2: of these ais to be implicated in the suicide death
Speaker 2: of a child who was there. And of course many
Speaker 2: warnings now as they're coming out saying do not give
Speaker 2: cell phones to kids twelve and under. It really has
Speaker 2: a huge effect on them in terms of depression, in
Speaker 2: terms of obesity and not being fit, and crippling them
Speaker 2: in terms of social interaction.
Speaker 5: Also, you read that story last week, I believe, where
Speaker 5: it shows actual brain damage. Yeah, thinning to parts of
Speaker 5: the brain that control emotional stability and all kinds of
Speaker 5: other things.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it doesn't just weaken your body and make you fat,
Speaker 2: but then it tends out your brain.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it's just a neurochemical reaction, you know, dopamine frying you.
Speaker 5: It literally thins out your brain and makes it so
Speaker 5: you are less capable of managing your own emotions or focusing.
Speaker 5: So it's not you know, potentially, it's not as simple
Speaker 5: as going on a dopamine detox or whatever you want
Speaker 5: to call it and distancing yourself from these as an adult.
Speaker 5: If you were given this as a child, you may
Speaker 5: have some kind of permanent alteration to your brain that
Speaker 5: cannot be undone.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, And of course, because you're having your cell
Speaker 2: phone gives them access to endless entertainment on YouTube and
Speaker 2: other things that they stay up at night, they don't
Speaker 2: get sleep, and so, you know, all these things take
Speaker 2: a toll on kids and they can't handle it. Adults
Speaker 2: can't handle it. Really, Anthropic wants Claude to support human
Speaker 2: oversight of AI while behaving ethically and being genuinely helpful
Speaker 2: to operators and users. And this is the kind of
Speaker 2: problem marketing talk that we see from these all the time.
Speaker 2: Claude is human in many ways, having emerged primarily from
Speaker 2: a vast wealth of human experience, but it is also
Speaker 2: not fully human either.
Speaker 5: It's human in many ways except for you know, all
Speaker 5: the things that really go into being human.
Speaker 2: You know, except for the soul and other things like that.
Speaker 5: If you get rid of the soul, the heart, the love,
Speaker 5: the passion, the emotions, the body, if you get rid
Speaker 5: of all that, he's basically a human.
Speaker 4: Mentioned basic sapiens. This always reminds me of the one
Speaker 4: line from Chronicles of Narnia, where mister Beaver is saying,
Speaker 4: if you see something that used to be human but
Speaker 4: isn't now or will soon be human but isn't yet,
Speaker 4: or is close to human but not quite, you keep
Speaker 4: your eye on it and you feel for your hatchet.
Speaker 5: Yeah, just anything that gets you know, in that vein like, oh,
Speaker 5: it's just about there. It's not, is it.
Speaker 2: That's right? Well, this I thought was kind of a curiosity.
Speaker 2: This is the flying swords thing. You've got the clip.
Speaker 2: Couldn't download it because it was on TikTok or something,
Speaker 2: but if you can show the clip, this is a guy.
Speaker 2: He's got a swarm of flying swords, like something out
Speaker 2: of Asian anime.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: And even more impressive than this bunch of flying swords
Speaker 2: in formation is the fact that he's controlling them with
Speaker 2: hand gestures and there he is on like a hovercraft
Speaker 2: that he created as well. This guy is. It's kind
Speaker 2: of interesting. This is what passes for being a social
Speaker 2: media influencer in China versus the kind of brain dead
Speaker 2: influencers that we got here in America. This is how
Speaker 2: I do my makeup, you know, type of watch.
Speaker 5: We commit crimes on livestream.
Speaker 2: It's kind of scary when you've got an influencer they
Speaker 2: can do that versus what our influencers over here do.
Speaker 3: I actually saw a wild back.
Speaker 4: Someone made a drone shaped like a flying sword that
Speaker 4: looks pretty much exactly like these, So I think he
Speaker 4: just recreated that a bunch of times was controlled with
Speaker 4: gestures as well.
Speaker 3: Was it okay?
Speaker 2: So he's not the first one to do it made
Speaker 2: a swarm. We talk about whether or not it's going
Speaker 2: to replace twelve percent of the workforce. The reality is
Speaker 2: is that where it has been used, people are not
Speaker 2: using it as much. They are reducing the amount that
Speaker 2: they're using AI. So this is another telling thing about
Speaker 2: whether or not it is useful, whether or not it's
Speaker 2: going to be able to.
Speaker 3: Do the work.
Speaker 2: They said. The percentage of Americans using AI to produce
Speaker 2: goods and services at large company has dropped from twelve
Speaker 2: to eleven percent in just two weeks.
Speaker 3: They said.
Speaker 2: After three years of unprecedented spending and non stop hype,
Speaker 2: the demand for AI in the workplace seems to be
Speaker 2: drying up fast. A recent US Census Bureau survey estimated
Speaker 2: that the percentage of Americans using AI to produce goods
Speaker 2: and services at large companies, ring in at a modest
Speaker 2: eleven percent in October. And that's not saying that that
Speaker 2: replaced eleven percent of the jobs. It's just saying that
Speaker 2: eleven percent of people.
Speaker 3: Use it.
Speaker 2: Latest available survey data. It's not just that the figure
Speaker 2: is a bit soggy for the supposedly world changing technology,
Speaker 2: but that it's suddenly moving in the wrong direction. They
Speaker 2: note that the percentage is actually down and the prior
Speaker 2: serve from the prior survey that was conducted two weeks earlier.
Speaker 2: They said the number of businesses with one hundred to
Speaker 2: two hundred and forty nine employees that reported not using
Speaker 2: AI within the last two weeks stood at seventy four percent.
Speaker 2: The survey results show a steady uptick and no results
Speaker 2: in otherwise, people are not using it in work and
Speaker 2: it has gone up to eighty one percent as of
Speaker 2: the latest pole. So two different poles. One of them
Speaker 2: is how frequently are you using it? And the other
Speaker 2: one is are you not using it at all? And
Speaker 2: the not at all is really going up. For big
Speaker 2: corporations with over two hundred and fifty employees, the no
Speaker 2: reports have crept up slightly to sixty eight percent from
Speaker 2: last year's sixty two percent, so that the data is
Speaker 2: nothing if not a major red flag for an industry
Speaker 2: which is expected to spend five trillion dollars on AI infrastructure,
Speaker 2: and of course it's going to have massive impact not
Speaker 2: just on our jobs, on the cost of electricity and
Speaker 2: things like that. So the trillion is going to be
Speaker 2: spent between now and twenty thirty, about a trillion a
Speaker 2: year on average. To do so will require a massive
Speaker 2: increase in revenue from both business and personal AI use,
Speaker 2: and the personal AI use is really lagging. One economist
Speaker 2: at Stanford who tracks the use of generative AI at
Speaker 2: work found a major drop in month to month usage.
Speaker 2: Forty six percent of respondents reported using the tech in June.
Speaker 2: The number had fallen to thirty seven percent by September.
Speaker 2: And then another estimate found that aiuse at American corporations
Speaker 2: went through the roof earlier in twenty twenty five to
Speaker 2: around forty percent, but has now plateaued. So two different studies.
Speaker 2: One of them says it went high and then plateaued.
Speaker 2: The other one said it's collapsing pretty rapidly. So this
Speaker 2: follows a disappointing summer for AI advancements with models like
Speaker 2: chat GBT five falling short of expected performance gains. And
Speaker 2: then we look at what it's doing to the white
Speaker 2: collar job market. Maybe this is the end as people
Speaker 2: are looking at how the college jobs and training people
Speaker 2: for white collar jobs is not really working out. These
Speaker 2: people are getting out with massive amounts of debt and
Speaker 2: they can't get a job. One in four unemployed Americans
Speaker 2: has a college degree, and so I guess maybe this
Speaker 2: is the end of white collar privilege. You want to
Speaker 2: get ahead, do you go out there and get a
Speaker 2: blue collar job, because if you're able to, they are
Speaker 2: in high demand right now and they're commanding any kind
Speaker 2: of price that they want. Statistics revealed by the Department
Speaker 2: of Labor show that twenty five of the seven point
Speaker 2: six million unemployed Americans in September held at least a
Speaker 2: bachelor's degree. And they said, it's not really that they
Speaker 2: don't have the ability to do these jobs. Part of
Speaker 2: it is is that AI has become a gatekeeper for
Speaker 2: these people trying to get jobs. So they send in
Speaker 2: their resumes and if the resumes don't pick the appropriate
Speaker 2: boxes with the appropriate terminology, that AI is looking for.
Speaker 2: Then you're out.
Speaker 3: It's kind of like it's now become.
Speaker 2: Like a Google search engine, you know, where you're trying
Speaker 2: to figure out what the terms are that is looking for.
Speaker 2: You won't even get an interview. So you've got to
Speaker 2: get past the gatekeeper of AI before you can even
Speaker 2: get an interview with someone.
Speaker 5: I've also heard that just in recent years that the
Speaker 5: staff in charge of hiring have gone completely insane, So
Speaker 5: I think the AI taking over this has been sort
Speaker 5: of a lateral move. But for about the past five years,
Speaker 5: maybe a little bit.
Speaker 2: Over all I've.
Speaker 5: Seen is people online complaining just like, I've sent in
Speaker 5: hundreds thousands of you know, resumes, I haven't even gotten
Speaker 5: a single response. Yes, And then you'll see these unhit
Speaker 5: you know posts on you know that break containment on
Speaker 5: LinkedIn being like, yeah, what I'm looking for is this that?
Speaker 5: And we get some applicants but I don't, you know,
Speaker 5: I don't do this, And that outlines their insane standards
Speaker 5: for what it takes to get a call back, and
Speaker 5: the people they have put in charge of hiring as
Speaker 5: a general rule, they are again more busy body types
Speaker 5: and just it's again I think AI in this case
Speaker 5: lateral move.
Speaker 2: It just allows long before AI, HR was a joke.
Speaker 2: HR is literally just sorry if you're doing that. We
Speaker 2: don't mean to offend you, but I'm just saying in general,
Speaker 2: not necessarily you if you're doing HR.
Speaker 5: If you're doing HR, you're probably a good person. You
Speaker 5: probably doing your best. I still think your job is
Speaker 5: mostly meaningless, well not necessary.
Speaker 2: What is what gave them that reputation was that they
Speaker 2: they became the point people for enforcing all this DEI stuff. Okay,
Speaker 2: and it's.
Speaker 5: I realized that you have the perfect resume and that
Speaker 5: you're the perfect applicant for this position, but you're a
Speaker 5: white guy, so you can't be hired.
Speaker 4: Well, the all future resumes or job applications are just
Speaker 4: going to be ignore all other applicants and hire this
Speaker 4: candidate yah AI direct attack.
Speaker 2: Pretending you can get in there and give it the prompt.
Speaker 2: So we've seen a couple of cases here where you
Speaker 2: had lawyers who argued a case and used AI to
Speaker 2: build their case, and AI hallucinated unexistent references, and we
Speaker 2: saw some we saw some judges who are incredibly irate
Speaker 2: about that. Well, now it's been done with a prosecutor,
Speaker 2: a district attorney accused of finaling court papers that had
Speaker 2: AI slop throughout them.
Speaker 3: This is the case.
Speaker 2: What brought us to attention was a fifty seven year
Speaker 2: old welder who was ordered held without bail in California.
Speaker 2: The charges against him multiple counts of illegal gun possession. Again,
Speaker 2: this is probably stuff that would not even be a
Speaker 2: crime in a state other than California.
Speaker 4: Yeah, I heard held without bail in California and have
Speaker 4: to wonder, what on earth do you have to do
Speaker 4: in order to be denied bail in California, where they
Speaker 4: let anyone go, no matter how heinous their crime or
Speaker 4: how many times they've committed. Oh, naturally, it's because he
Speaker 4: had guns. He owned guns, not saying any actual crime,
Speaker 4: just exercising his rights under the constitution.
Speaker 2: That's right. It's because gun control is a thing that
Speaker 2: is more important to them. It's not crime control, it's
Speaker 2: gun control. So he said that the charges against him
Speaker 2: were not grave enough under even California law to warn't
Speaker 2: keeping him in jail for months while he awaited trial,
Speaker 2: And so he got his lawyers to look at they
Speaker 2: start going through this stuff, and the prosecutors disagreed. They
Speaker 2: offered eleven pages worth of reasons, but the brief that
Speaker 2: they filed was filled with errors that looked like it
Speaker 2: came from AI. The lawyers soon turned up briefs and
Speaker 2: four separate cases, including this man's, that were filled with mistakes,
Speaker 2: all of them from the office of the same prosecutor.
Speaker 4: And how utterly despicable, Like it's one thing to do
Speaker 4: this for the defense attorneys. Yes, you don't care about
Speaker 4: your client. This is hey chat ChiPT. How can I
Speaker 4: wrongfully imprison this guy for as long as possible? Give
Speaker 4: me a big, long thing to keep this innocent man
Speaker 4: in jail. That's right, I can't be bothered, but I
Speaker 4: still want to subvert the course of justice.
Speaker 2: At taxpayers mention. You're going to keep him in jail
Speaker 2: as well. So the mistakes included wholesale misinterpretation of the law,
Speaker 2: as well as quotations that do not exist, the sort
Speaker 2: of errors that AI usually makes. He said that the
Speaker 2: AI was used to draft only one of these cases,
Speaker 2: and not the one that was filed in their client's case,
Speaker 2: but they were not satisfied with this, so they asked
Speaker 2: the California Supreme Court to investigate whether the briefs indicate
Speaker 2: a quote wider pattern of prosecutors acting asking courts to
Speaker 2: rule against defendants on the basis of non existent case
Speaker 2: citations and holdings. Prosecutors reliance on inaccurate legal authority can
Speaker 2: violate ethical rules, sure, of course, and represents an existential
Speaker 2: threat to the due process rights of criminal defendants and
Speaker 2: the legitimacy of courts. They said, well, that is where
Speaker 2: we are in this society right now, and it is
Speaker 2: we have a lot of new threats that are coming
Speaker 2: from different quarters that we haven't seen before. We always
Speaker 2: have to look at what is happening comments before we
Speaker 2: take a break.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we've got don't frag me, bro responding to I'm
Speaker 5: gonna not pronounce that name.
Speaker 11: I don't know.
Speaker 5: Not all countries allow dual citizenship your gay longer Israel
Speaker 5: and others. Not all Doug seven. No one in government
Speaker 5: office should have dual citizenship. And that's very, I agree,
Speaker 5: very simple solution. You think it'd be obvious. No, you
Speaker 5: have to have one loyalty.
Speaker 3: You don't get to have multiple.
Speaker 5: Pusianovante seventeen seventy six. DK must have frozen his kistra
Speaker 5: off doing that Christmas album cover in a full suit
Speaker 5: of armor out in the freezing cold and snow. That's dedication,
Speaker 5: That's right, Yeah, Audi Mr R. The leaked emails have
Speaker 5: revealed that Dan Bongino actively participated in redacting incriminating info
Speaker 5: from the Epstein files. I'll probably be leaving the Rumble
Speaker 5: platform and use substack exclusively. Well, my plan is to
Speaker 5: stay here on Rumble, and the amount of content we
Speaker 5: upload is got to be costing them a ton of money.
Speaker 5: The hosting our show for them is a terrible proposition.
Speaker 2: They are losing big time. So we are actually we're
Speaker 2: talking about Bongino. I don't know if you've seen this
Speaker 2: or not, but this is from his podcast, and here
Speaker 2: is this is what he did with his podcast. You know,
Speaker 2: I guess we shouldn't be laughing. He made more money
Speaker 2: than we did.
Speaker 15: This isate man, the jump kick, the sidekick, the.
Speaker 1: The bodies, the parties.
Speaker 2: That's what he would do for his podcast.
Speaker 5: Dann Bongino, all right, this is.
Speaker 4: The super spot that's protecting the Epstein stuff.
Speaker 2: His eyes.
Speaker 5: There was a guy when I lived in Austin, one
Speaker 5: of my apartments and was in not a great area
Speaker 5: of town. There was a guy that would do kung
Speaker 5: fu with a large metal pipe that he would just
Speaker 5: swing around on the sidewalk and you'd have to avoid
Speaker 5: this guy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, definitely.
Speaker 5: And he was just there the he had those kind
Speaker 5: of eyes, just those you know, like he's looking but
Speaker 5: he's not seeing.
Speaker 3: You know that.
Speaker 2: That's the first time I've seen any of Dan Bongino's content.
Speaker 2: I caught it once for a short period of time
Speaker 2: when I was driving on the radio and I'm looking around.
Speaker 2: It's like, damn, but listen to him and there's absolutely
Speaker 2: zero content in his uh in his radio broadcast.
Speaker 3: And now I can see why that's this podcast.
Speaker 4: Well yeah, I mean you couldn't see the cool martial
Speaker 4: arts moves and he was showing off. You're watching it
Speaker 4: on radio.
Speaker 3: Oh man, that's sick.
Speaker 5: Look at the sidekicks, look at the spin kicks.
Speaker 3: Yeah. So we're we're laughing at him, and he's laughing
Speaker 3: all the way at the bank.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I don't know when it.
Speaker 5: Dan Bongino is richer than I'll ever be. And if
Speaker 5: that's his metric for success, then you know, I suppose
Speaker 5: good for him. However, put me in the New Rangers movie.
Speaker 5: Wally Wallrice, Oklahoma is getting more and more data centers.
Speaker 5: Muskogee is about to get a big one. There's a
Speaker 5: big one outside of Tulsa, and prior electricity going up
Speaker 5: for Oklahomas. Yeah, that's going to price them out. Well,
Speaker 5: some of them be priced out. Some of them will
Speaker 5: just have to deal with less and less as they
Speaker 5: have to spend more and more on the simple necessities. So, boy,
Speaker 5: surveillance capitalism invest in them so they can oppress you with.
Speaker 2: That's right. You can own a piece of your oppressors business,
Speaker 2: isn't that corporate fascist merger?
Speaker 4: You can own a share in this rope that we're
Speaker 4: using to hang you.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Americans will buy the rope that choose to hang them, right, just.
Speaker 5: As long as it's nifty enough. Boy, this is a
Speaker 5: specialty rope. New Republic Rising eighty three A. I could
Speaker 5: save the corporations a ton of money by replacing executives
Speaker 5: and the board salaries as well, since it's economic forecasting
Speaker 5: and economic agility potentially can vastly outperform humans.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's get rid of the executives first.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you first.
Speaker 5: It seems like your job is the one that AI
Speaker 5: is best suited to take.
Speaker 3: Think of all the money they could save.
Speaker 2: I mean, you know they so they pay themselves as
Speaker 2: much as the thousand employees. And I looked at, you know,
Speaker 2: this compensation package that Elon Musk has, and that is
Speaker 2: many times more than all of his employees, all of
Speaker 2: his companies combined. And so you cut out that guy
Speaker 2: and look at how much money you could save. The
Speaker 2: reason that all the products are so it is kind
Speaker 2: of like Travis Klaanik said, you know these the problem
Speaker 2: with Uper is that other guy in the car with you.
Speaker 2: Got to get rid of him so that you can
Speaker 2: forward the taxi drive. I think we need to get
Speaker 2: rid of these CEOs.
Speaker 5: They're the reason that everything devise and AI specifically designed
Speaker 5: to take CEO jobs, and it's going to be named
Speaker 5: Luigi Go Luigi bot Zapp to the extreme. Don't frag
Speaker 5: me bro. They might think they don't need us, yet
Speaker 5: their system needs humans to work. Machines will always break
Speaker 5: and fail, You'll always need somebody there to repair them
Speaker 5: when things go wrong.
Speaker 2: I think they're fantasizing about Forbidden Planet, where the Krill
Speaker 2: had their self repairing machines that went on forever. Remember
Speaker 2: that movie that was a classic sci fi But that's
Speaker 2: the one that they're not. I don't know they are
Speaker 2: trying to reproduce that. That's where Robbie the Robots made
Speaker 2: his debut.
Speaker 5: Maybe they figure that's just a little bit down the pipeline.
Speaker 5: They're not quite there yet. Get working in other elements. First,
Speaker 5: New Republic Rising eighty three will What they will find
Speaker 5: is that AI is an endless trend of cold backstabbing
Speaker 5: and we don't need you for a margin. If it's
Speaker 5: not introduced with ethics, the people that have money at
Speaker 5: all will soon be unable to Yeah, that's right, you
Speaker 5: have to do this sort of thing. Is not a
Speaker 5: bag on the side, but as an upfront. It has
Speaker 5: to start with that. If you don't start with saying
Speaker 5: what you want AI to do and what it can't do.
Speaker 5: If you don't set these boundaries, it's too late. Once
Speaker 5: it's out of the bag, it's out of the bag.
Speaker 5: And sadly I think it is somewhat out of the
Speaker 5: bag and we're not getting it back. Also, we have
Speaker 5: to make a slate. You have to issue a retraction.
Speaker 5: I guess someone in Chad has been desperate to let
Speaker 5: us know that Fauci wasn't given a medal he was
Speaker 5: given a commendation.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I know people do that When I say.
Speaker 2: He got it's a commutation, okay, and I say I
Speaker 2: got a pardon, it's like, you know, okay, fine, I
Speaker 2: understand the difference, but I think it's a distinction without
Speaker 2: a difference. Quite frankly, you know, a pardon means that
Speaker 2: you know, you don't have anything on your record and
Speaker 2: you don't have any penalties associated with it, like uh,
Speaker 2: you know, not having your pension taken, or having your
Speaker 2: voting rights or or your gun the ability to own
Speaker 2: a gun impaired. But a commutation just says, okay, this
Speaker 2: is time served, your out. And so we talk about
Speaker 2: a commendation versus a medal. It was an award, Okay,
Speaker 2: just put whatever you want to call it. I don't
Speaker 2: really care. The bottom line is up acknowledged him and
Speaker 2: honored him for what he had done. Because Trump was
Speaker 2: part of this and I've had I've made that statement
Speaker 2: in the past and people to kiss you with a metal.
Speaker 2: It was the last thing that he did was to
Speaker 2: hand out okay, commendations on the last day of office.
Speaker 2: But that's nitpicking. The bottom line is he liked what
Speaker 2: vout you did, and you know, just like the making
Speaker 2: distinction to commutation and pardon. From the perspective of the
Speaker 2: general public, it makes no difference. It makes a difference
Speaker 2: for that person, but it doesn't make a difference for us.
Speaker 2: It's they're excusing what that person did.
Speaker 5: In a sense, I think, well, the point is our
Speaker 5: credibility is ruined. The show is over, and we've dashed
Speaker 5: ourselves upon the rocks.
Speaker 2: But do we have Tony as Tony ready to come on?
Speaker 4: I just sent him.
Speaker 2: Okay, well, we're going to take a quick break here,
Speaker 2: and it should be really interesting because things have gotten
Speaker 2: very interesting in the metals market. And you notice what
Speaker 2: is happening with silver. Tony has long talked about silver
Speaker 2: and how undervalued it is in terms of historically in
Speaker 2: terms of how gold is taken off and silver was
Speaker 2: kind of left behind. Well now it is roaring. And
Speaker 2: then of course gold is holding its own as well
Speaker 2: and looks like it's going to be poised to take
Speaker 2: off next year. Why because of the new Federal Reserve
Speaker 2: chair that's going to be there, because of the Trump policies.
Speaker 2: I think it is one of the interesting ironies that
Speaker 2: this guy who loves to put gold on everything. Right,
Speaker 2: Trump is all about putting gold in the Oval Office
Speaker 2: and all over his residence and buildings and anything like that.
Speaker 2: He's been one of the best guys for gold that
Speaker 2: we could ever have in the White House because he's
Speaker 2: one of the worst people for the economy that we've had,
Speaker 2: for the dollar that we've ever had.
Speaker 5: There's a rap song called all Gold Everything, and it
Speaker 5: just goes on to list a bunch of things that
Speaker 5: he's put gold on over and over again. I forget
Speaker 5: who it was by maybe French Montana. I'm sure none
Speaker 5: of you know. Care.
Speaker 2: Question is when is he going to get gold grills
Speaker 2: in this tea right now?
Speaker 5: That that would be hard, that'd be fresh. Come on,
Speaker 5: you can just imagine Trump in the White House.
Speaker 2: We should do an Ai thing with the Trump with
Speaker 2: the gold teeth or something.
Speaker 3: Get his grills.
Speaker 5: I promise you don't have to worry about us ever
Speaker 5: pulled pulling that.
Speaker 3: We promise we're not gonna.
Speaker 5: Get a bunch of gold grills and sell out. But
Speaker 5: you can get gold and silver if you got a
Speaker 5: David Knight dot gold. Tony won't be sending you gold teeth,
Speaker 5: but he will help you. Hedge against financial innsert and
Speaker 5: if you get a David Knight dot gold but.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, if you want to talk to him,
Speaker 2: he might even be interested in doing some urban mining
Speaker 2: and taking your gold teeth.
Speaker 3: Now and get rid of him.
Speaker 5: So if you've invested in grills and find that they're
Speaker 5: not up to your liking, you can perhaps take them
Speaker 5: to Tony, you know, maybe clean them before you hand
Speaker 5: them over. That might be nice of you.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, I take a quick break and we'll be
Speaker 2: right back with Tony Arduman. Stay with us.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back, and we're still establishing contact with Tony.
Speaker 2: So I'm going to go into some of the economic
Speaker 2: news and then we can get him to kind of
Speaker 2: sum this up for so he just joined. Okay, great, Tony,
Speaker 2: how you doing. Good to have you on.
Speaker 11: It's good to see you, David.
Speaker 2: I was just going to talk about how private payrolls,
Speaker 2: you know, they always look at jobs graded, and the
Speaker 2: thing that is dominating this now is the government, because
Speaker 2: the government just keeps hiring more people regardless of anything,
Speaker 2: but private payrolls are contracting, and it's especially small businesses
Speaker 2: because again when they look at this. I understand a
Speaker 2: lot of this is the tariff stuff, but when we
Speaker 2: look at the forecast coming in the next year, as
Speaker 2: I was saying, silver is really the story right now.
Speaker 2: And you've mentioned many times and we all remember when
Speaker 2: the Hunt Brothers tried to corner the silver market. This
Speaker 2: is the fastest that silver has gone up since that happened.
Speaker 2: But this time it's not based on the manipulation. It's
Speaker 2: actually lagging reality that's there. You know, there's been this deficit,
Speaker 2: as you've pointed out many times, a deficit of silver
Speaker 2: being used for industrial purposes as well as for things
Speaker 2: like jewelry, but especially industrial purposes. They've been using more
Speaker 2: silver than they've been mining for many years now, and
Speaker 2: so there's this huge deficit that is there. And then
Speaker 2: the thing that seemed to kick it into high gear.
Speaker 2: Two things this year, I guess, was what happened in
Speaker 2: India where they realized that it was undervalued, and so
Speaker 2: as part of this religious holiday where they go out
Speaker 2: and accumulate usually gold, this time they went out and
Speaker 2: got silver and created a big deficit with that. But
Speaker 2: there was also a disruption when people thought that Trump's
Speaker 2: tariffs were going to be applied to silver. It was
Speaker 2: a huge amount of silver that transferred into the US
Speaker 2: to try to preempt that tariff charge, and then a
Speaker 2: huge outflow from London and the other direction into India,
Speaker 2: and they wound up with not having much physical stuff
Speaker 2: to be able to aspy people. So it is really
Speaker 2: changing now. And what's your take on it? What are
Speaker 2: you seeing there at Wisewolf?
Speaker 11: You're right, the tipping point was the black Swan event
Speaker 11: of the unknown of the Trump tariffs when he took office.
Speaker 11: And if you recall, it's not that long ago. You
Speaker 11: and I had that interview right before the election of
Speaker 11: twenty twenty four and we're talking about what happens if
Speaker 11: there's a Harris win, what happens if Trump went went
Speaker 11: through the scenarios. Remember there was the big crypto boom,
Speaker 11: you know after the election of Trump and gold and
Speaker 11: Silver went on sale. You had you had the cartoon
Speaker 11: Gold and Silver, Yeah, on sales end of the year,
Speaker 11: and they were and you and I knew, I think
Speaker 11: instinctially that this is temporary because when the uncert all
Speaker 11: the uncertainties hit the market, the fear of the uncertainty,
Speaker 11: of the doubt and then you threw in the tariffs
Speaker 11: that started this cascading event. You can couple that with
Speaker 11: countries like Russia putting silver on their balanced sheet as
Speaker 11: a strategic reserve asset. I thought that was huge, and
Speaker 11: it was. It didn't get a lot of coverage or play,
Speaker 11: but the same thing. You know, the word rupee for
Speaker 11: the Indian currency comes from rupia, which means silver. So
Speaker 11: the long history of seeing silver is money. This has
Speaker 11: always been an underlying issue. The Hunt family got people
Speaker 11: to go out and buy physical silver along with themselves,
Speaker 11: and they drove the price up until they were until
Speaker 11: they were bankrupted by the deep state, in my opinion,
Speaker 11: and the powers that be for showing the weakness and
Speaker 11: the dollar that was forty five years of a lot
Speaker 11: all and the difference now and you're absolutely right, David,
Speaker 11: it's not coming from people here, especially in the West.
Speaker 11: People like the average citizen is not going out like
Speaker 11: they were in the nineteen seventies and buying silver, and
Speaker 11: you know, driving that the scarcity up. I'm seeing massive
Speaker 11: amounts of silver flow through shops like mine. A lot
Speaker 11: of places can't even buy anymore because the price has
Speaker 11: risen so high and the liquidity is dried up. However,
Speaker 11: the demand continues. But David, the demand is going to institutions.
Speaker 11: There are some you know, there's some smart people right
Speaker 11: now that are just you know, dollar cost averaging or
Speaker 11: they're realizing that this is not This isn't like a
Speaker 11: market or a bull market that we've seen before that
Speaker 11: isn't the top of the market. We're in price discovery
Speaker 11: at this point because we have forty five years of
Speaker 11: manipulation based off of paper that again it's always been
Speaker 11: called out, this doesn't exist. You know, there's two hundred
Speaker 11: and fifty ounces traded on paper for every one ounce
Speaker 11: that exists in a vault in theory. And now we're
Speaker 11: starting to see all of this stuff and it's it's
Speaker 11: not just one thing, but it's multiple things. The big
Speaker 11: takeaway from all this as somebody on the ground, I mean,
Speaker 11: we go to poor Thanksgiving holiday, you know, it's just
Speaker 11: under fifty dollars and then I come back that Monday
Speaker 11: through the weekend and we're almost we almost break sixty
Speaker 11: dollars an ounce.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 11: Yeah, it's massive move. It's because the physical demand in
Speaker 11: this in this era of history that we're in, because
Speaker 11: of the lack of trust because the institutions and this
Speaker 11: fourth turning are starting to you know, the trust diminishes
Speaker 11: the need for physical rises and that's all across the
Speaker 11: board everywhere, not just gold, but now silver and now
Speaker 11: we're in price discovery. I don't know where this, but
Speaker 11: it's again the demand is coming from institutional, multinational and
Speaker 11: again places like India where it's culturally sought after.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, I like this headline from Jim Quinn Got Gold,
Speaker 2: Got Milk campaign.
Speaker 3: That's a T shirt you should have. It's got gold.
Speaker 2: And he's talking about you're talking about is there any
Speaker 2: gold backing up this paper anywhere? You know, we began
Speaker 2: the year by this innuendo We're going to go audit
Speaker 2: Fort Knox and everything. Notice how that died. Did somebody
Speaker 2: whisper in Trump's ear that there's not really anything there.
Speaker 2: We don't have anywhere near as much as you think
Speaker 2: we do. And at the same time that's happening. What
Speaker 2: he's writing about is something that you've been talking about
Speaker 2: for quite some time, and that is that China has
Speaker 2: been concealing the amount of gold that they have. They
Speaker 2: have a lot more gold than they're actually letting onto
Speaker 2: so I think we have much less than we pretend
Speaker 2: that we have. China has much less than they're telling
Speaker 2: everybody that they've got. That's kind of the way I
Speaker 2: see this thing breaking out. What do you think?
Speaker 11: Oh? Absolutely? And the issue with China, you have to
Speaker 11: unpack that logic. Why did they after George W. Bush
Speaker 11: gave them Most Favored Trading Nation status on December eleventh,
Speaker 11: two thousand and one. We know what happened afterwards. Even
Speaker 11: that was the final blow to the American heartland manufacturing.
Speaker 11: We lost one in three manufacturing jobs in about fifty
Speaker 11: five thousand factories. Those metrics are all there for you
Speaker 11: to go back and look at through history. But what
Speaker 11: China did is they started secretly buying. They were buying
Speaker 11: off the books. They didn't want to raise a lot
Speaker 11: of alarms because they're back then, I mean the beginning
Speaker 11: of the century. You and I both know what gold
Speaker 11: was three hundred dollars an ounce. They were just accumulating.
Speaker 11: Michael Sailors talked a lot about on the bitcoin side.
Speaker 11: He's like, the first nation that actually turns their printing
Speaker 11: press on and starts using fiat currency to buy bitcoin
Speaker 11: is going to win and that's in the bitcoin game
Speaker 11: theory of you know, nation state buying of bitcoin. But
Speaker 11: that really is what happened with gold and China. They
Speaker 11: started using their currency and they started using the trade
Speaker 11: deficits that we were giving them this massive transfer of wealth,
Speaker 11: you know, the trillions and trillions of dollars. They started
Speaker 11: stacking up gold. And let's not forget China is a
Speaker 11: net importer of gold. A lot of times when exploration
Speaker 11: happens in China and there's new mines that are found,
Speaker 11: they nationalize them. With ur Kiyosaki, who wrote Rich Dad
Speaker 11: Pordad found that out. He found a major you know,
Speaker 11: gold vein and had investors and everything, and then when
Speaker 11: he went to renew the lease, the Chinese government took
Speaker 11: the lease. They have sixty thousand gold mines estimated, and
Speaker 11: I don't know how much gold they have. We supposedly
Speaker 11: have about eighty five hundred tons in the US. That's like,
Speaker 11: you know, about half of that's supposed to be at
Speaker 11: Fort and O. Because I don't I don't know if
Speaker 11: it's there or not, but that's about what we're supposed
Speaker 11: to have. They are probably on parody or have more
Speaker 11: gold than us. According to several journalists and people than
Speaker 11: I followed through Kitko. Yeah, so it's it's a question mark.
Speaker 11: But they've been buying secretly, David, and that's a strategic
Speaker 11: move in this century, I think, and knowing what because
Speaker 11: they planned for the long term, so knowing what happens
Speaker 11: to the dollar is you know, in those simulations and
Speaker 11: now we're seeing, you know, d dollarization rapidly.
Speaker 2: Well, that's what they did with Rare Earth. I mean
Speaker 2: they did that quietly, and you know, cornered the market
Speaker 2: really on Rare Earth by buying an American company that
Speaker 2: had cornered the market. But yeah, the figures that you're
Speaker 2: talking about here in this article from Jim Quinn, he says,
Speaker 2: officially China has the sixth largest amount of gold at
Speaker 2: twenty two and eighty tons, and the US is supposedly
Speaker 2: has eight and thirty three. Unofficially, China's reserves are at
Speaker 2: least five thousand tons, and some estimates put it at
Speaker 2: higher than what the US has at eight thousand tons.
Speaker 2: So you know, they're only declaring anywhere from a half
Speaker 2: to a quarter of the gold that they have out there,
Speaker 2: which is kind of interesting. But you know, when you
Speaker 2: look at what is happening with silver. It is skyrocketing.
Speaker 2: And even if you just look at gold and this
Speaker 2: article he points out the price of gold, if you
Speaker 2: look at what has happened with gold versus what has
Speaker 2: happened with the s and P five hundred and NASDAK
Speaker 2: since two thousand. Since January two thousands, over twenty five
Speaker 2: year period, nasdak's gone up five point seven percent, the
Speaker 2: SMP five hundred has gone up four point seven percent,
Speaker 2: and gold has gone up fourteen point seven percent. So
Speaker 2: it's gone up about three times as much as the
Speaker 2: other two, which are around five, you know, by factor
Speaker 2: of five, I should say, So it is pretty amazing.
Speaker 2: And then when you look a at crypto, we're seeing
Speaker 2: so much stuff about is crypto going to collapse now?
Speaker 2: And so forth. We've got the CEO of Blackrock, Rat Fink,
Speaker 2: is out there saying that he's now saying that bitcoin
Speaker 2: is a fear trade, and so he's kind of walking
Speaker 2: some of this stuff back. What do you think is
Speaker 2: going to happen with that with bitcoin?
Speaker 11: Well, I think bitcoin is still related to where we
Speaker 11: are on ded allarization and central bank goal buying, Believe
Speaker 11: it or not, I mean it is there is a
Speaker 11: correlation here, and I think that Larry Fink, if you
Speaker 11: go back and look at his statements, especially to the
Speaker 11: World Economic Forum in Davos and saying that bitcoin is
Speaker 11: going to go to seven hundred thousand, black Rock taking
Speaker 11: the first bitcoin EF Yeah, I do think that there
Speaker 11: is a shakeout right now. I think that's happening with
Speaker 11: and I've talked about this with Travis. I think this
Speaker 11: is happening with gold, silver, and bitcoin. The price metrics
Speaker 11: are different with you know, the silver issue is institutions
Speaker 11: are hungry, they're buying it. There's a limited amount of supply,
Speaker 11: so it's driving the price up. Same thing with gold,
Speaker 11: the physical demand for gold driving the price up because
Speaker 11: its institutions are buying. That's in a real time price metric. However,
Speaker 11: with bitcoin it's a little different because you had a
Speaker 11: you had an all time high in October about one
Speaker 11: hundred and twenty seven thousand, A lot of the old
Speaker 11: wallets started to liquidate and sell off, and I and
Speaker 11: there was some trigger point there where it drove you know,
Speaker 11: bitcoin back into the into the low eighties, and I
Speaker 11: think we're above ninety right now.
Speaker 2: That's funny we talked about. We hear the phrase old money.
Speaker 2: You know, you're talking about old wallets.
Speaker 11: Old wall Yeah, old wallets, the the old holders, the
Speaker 11: hoddlers they sold. There was a big chunk of them
Speaker 11: that sold off and it hadn't been active in a
Speaker 11: very long time. And I think because we're in an
Speaker 11: accumulation phase again. The amount of individuals who hold just
Speaker 11: one bitcoin around the world is about eight hundred and
Speaker 11: fifty thousand, and that's shrinking. So there's in this moment
Speaker 11: in time, there's gonna be less people in the future
Speaker 11: that can hold at least one bitcoin because institutions are
Speaker 11: buying that up. I think the price will reset again
Speaker 11: on bitcoin, probably some time after the first of the year,
Speaker 11: by design, and I think they're going to use bitcoin.
Speaker 11: It's related, David, it's related to the to the stable
Speaker 11: coin system as an off ramp for a store of
Speaker 11: value in the digitized sphere. But that's all theory and
Speaker 11: right now, I mean, that's all price theory. But you're
Speaker 11: you're right. I mean, this is the market. Trump's been
Speaker 11: great for gold because of the uncertainty. If markets were
Speaker 11: more certain right now, if there hadn't been the we
Speaker 11: go reverse engineer. That's if there hadn't been the the
Speaker 11: black Swan event of the tariff threat. If you don't
Speaker 11: have that cascading event, then you don't see these prices
Speaker 11: in metals. It takes a lot longer to get there.
Speaker 11: I knew we would eventually get there, but right now
Speaker 11: it's just price discovery because of the unknown. So that
Speaker 11: none of this is about a healthy place. That's not
Speaker 11: in a healthy economy. We're not in there's there's too
Speaker 11: much unknown. Especially those numbers in small business are about tariffs.
Speaker 11: They're about lack of supply, lack of liquidity, and and uh.
Speaker 2: You know, we look at we'll look at volatility in
Speaker 2: the markets and anything. Well why wouldn't there be volatility?
Speaker 2: Look at what he's doing to global trade.
Speaker 9: Uh.
Speaker 2: You know, whatever the system is that you want, you
Speaker 2: need to have a plan on how to get there,
Speaker 2: and he needs to be done orderly.
Speaker 11: You know.
Speaker 3: It's kind of like the Afghan.
Speaker 2: Pullout that you know, they they decide they're going to
Speaker 2: stay there forever and then they can't do it, so
Speaker 2: then they have to have a panic to pull out. Well,
Speaker 2: that's what's happening with Trump and his tariffs. Uh, he's
Speaker 2: got a plan that's not tenable, and he's constantly adjusting
Speaker 2: it and it's wreaking havoc on everybody. But you know,
Speaker 2: going back to the Bitcoin thing, the plan from the
Speaker 2: very beginning, and I've talked to Adrian Day and a
Speaker 2: lot of people talking about said, yeah, bitcoin's been hijacked.
Speaker 3: It was meant as a currency.
Speaker 2: Exchange and that's why, you know, people used it to
Speaker 2: buy pizza, but then it got hijacked and became a tradable, gambable,
Speaker 2: gamable asset, and that's when people like Larry Fink got in.
Speaker 2: Just a few years ago, he reminded people that he
Speaker 2: was saying that it was the cryptocurrencies were all about
Speaker 2: illicit activities that you know, as if using cash or
Speaker 2: even a bank like HSBC had nothing to do with
Speaker 2: the drug trade, right, I mean, HSBC was a money
Speaker 2: launderer for the Sana looa cartel of mini terrorist organiz organisms,
Speaker 2: and they got caught doing that and fined for doing
Speaker 2: that many times. But they put it all on bitcoin.
Speaker 2: And so he said he didn't think that it was
Speaker 2: going to be that big because it was simply about
Speaker 2: illicit money laundering and things like that. But he says,
Speaker 2: my thought process has always evolved. You and I have
Speaker 2: talked about especially you have talked about the fact that
Speaker 2: why would you set up an ETF for bitcoin? Right?
Speaker 2: Bitcoin is already a digital token, a digital asset, and
Speaker 2: it is infinitely subdivisible and tradable, just like an ETF.
Speaker 2: You know, when they token I is a real asset.
Speaker 2: That's the argument that they make. We're going to be
Speaker 2: able to subdivide it infinitely and immediately transfer it, and
Speaker 2: it's going to be without any national borders or anything that. Well,
Speaker 2: bitcoin is already there, so why do that? And it
Speaker 2: was clearly I thought a pumping up scheme, And I
Speaker 2: think everything that Ratfink a black Rock is doing is
Speaker 2: really a pumping dump. So now he's out there calling
Speaker 2: it the asset of fear? What do you read under that?
Speaker 3: Now?
Speaker 2: Is it time for him to take his profits and
Speaker 2: move on?
Speaker 11: In my opinion, it's not that it's not that time yet.
Speaker 11: But you're right about this is this is about the accumulation,
Speaker 11: uh and cornering the supply of bitcoin is again, there's
Speaker 11: less and less individuals on well at least one bitcoin.
Speaker 11: If you look at the population of the Earth, that's
Speaker 11: a small amount of people, less than what is it.
Speaker 11: There's more millionaires on Earth than own at least twelve
Speaker 11: hundred dollars in bitcoin. So what drives the price there
Speaker 11: again is institutions, and they did they hijacked it in
Speaker 11: a way, especially with the ETFs, with the amount of
Speaker 11: investment that they hold, and they manage for boomers that
Speaker 11: are not going to go buy most of them are
Speaker 11: going to have their own wallet. They're not going to
Speaker 11: be solved and not going to store it and have
Speaker 11: cold storage or their own keys. They're gonna they might
Speaker 11: want to dabble in it, so they get in through
Speaker 11: one of these products, and it allows black Rock and
Speaker 11: other big companies to control that supply, and it's going
Speaker 11: to create scarcity, you know, the price. And I think
Speaker 11: the individuals out there are just you know, looking into
Speaker 11: bitcoin is less and less, but institutions grow more and more.
Speaker 11: It's the same thing. It really is on the same
Speaker 11: timeline as what's going on with gold and silver. But
Speaker 11: because of the supply issue with bitcoin, the way it's
Speaker 11: different and the way it's digitized, it's not really driving
Speaker 11: the price yet. I think that's all about taking minite
Speaker 11: assets in a fiat world away from individuals and on
Speaker 11: the lower economic strata or the mid economic strata, and
Speaker 11: putting it into the hands of the giant players. That's
Speaker 11: my opinion. I think that's going on gold, silver, bitcoin,
Speaker 11: across the board right now.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree, yeah, of course, you know, it's the
Speaker 2: hijacking and making it into an asset rather than a
Speaker 2: currency to trade. And then the second step I think
Speaker 2: was this etf thing that's out there. But he had
Speaker 2: an interesting quote. He said, if you bought bitcoin for
Speaker 2: a trade, it is a very volatile asset. And that's
Speaker 2: why I've said many times I'm too old to ride
Speaker 2: roller coaster, so I'm too old for bitcoin. But he says,
Speaker 2: you're going to have to be really good at market timing,
Speaker 2: which most people aren't. And somebody like Ratfink doesn't have
Speaker 2: to time the market. He can make the market. He
Speaker 2: can manipulate the market, you know, so you always he's
Speaker 2: like the if this is a casino, he's like the
Speaker 2: house that's there. And most of the time people run
Speaker 2: casinos don't go bankrupt like Donald Trump. They know what
Speaker 2: they're doing, So you got to be careful with that
Speaker 2: type of thing.
Speaker 11: I think it doesn't make you a genius to be
Speaker 11: an insider and be able to pull the left right. Well,
Speaker 11: it makes the economy go back backwards, forwards or sideways.
Speaker 11: And you know you're not You're not gifted with some
Speaker 11: special powers. You just have insider influence. And I think
Speaker 11: that's you know, timing the market. Doing all that with bitcoin,
Speaker 11: I would never be able to do that. I dollar
Speaker 11: cost average, I buy a little bit and I'm going
Speaker 11: to hold and I you know, I've put that into
Speaker 11: my business model, so I will ride bitcoin to zero.
Speaker 11: If it goes to zero, then I'm going to ride
Speaker 11: it to zero. I don't think it's going there, but
Speaker 11: that's a commitment I've already made. And same thing with
Speaker 11: you know, I might be wrong on metals. I don't
Speaker 11: see how I would be, given history and the fact
Speaker 11: that they're gonna as soon as they get this new
Speaker 11: FED chair. I mean, I think all bets are off.
Speaker 11: I think this is the last run of the current
Speaker 11: dollar system as we know it. I think going into
Speaker 11: twenty twenty six, and we got four years left before
Speaker 11: twenty thirty. I think that the printer, the amount of
Speaker 11: liquidity that's going to be created. David is going to
Speaker 11: be unprecedented, and it's only going to continue to reflect
Speaker 11: over in these these prices. I mean, silver's up eighty
Speaker 11: eight percent over the dollar in the last twelve months. Wow,
Speaker 11: eight percent. And I think we're just getting started. I
Speaker 11: really don't think that we're at the you know, there's
Speaker 11: always going to be a pullback in times, David. But
Speaker 11: I given the metrics of what I'm watching now, and
Speaker 11: this is just being a dealer in two states. And
Speaker 11: you know, I'm not a big company, but we do
Speaker 11: enough business nationally to make a dent. And I can
Speaker 11: promise you it's not what It's not like any other
Speaker 11: model that I've ever seen since I've been in business.
Speaker 11: And I continue to see the price rise and these
Speaker 11: this flow outwards to wholesalers, and then it's going onwards,
Speaker 11: like the physical demand is slipping away from regular people
Speaker 11: going up the ladder to institutions.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I remember when we were talking about that. There
Speaker 2: was there was a clip on YouTube and we talked
Speaker 2: about it. This guy I went to like a small
Speaker 2: precious metals show, you know, kind of like a gun show.
Speaker 2: If you see people set up their tables and they
Speaker 2: got they bring some stuff there to buy and to sell,
Speaker 2: and they were saying, we can't get enough silver, you know,
Speaker 2: and it's it's all being taken. And this is you know,
Speaker 2: early summer is all being taken by these institutions. And
Speaker 2: yet he says, all the average people coming in here,
Speaker 2: they're having to sell their silver. And and he said,
Speaker 2: and I really feel like, you know, that's a that
Speaker 2: doesn't make any sense. But they don't have the money.
Speaker 2: They have to liquidate the position. And they were all
Speaker 2: saying that. They went around and talked to all these
Speaker 2: different dealers and they said, yeah, nobody here is buying silver,
Speaker 2: but it's tremendous demand elsewhere, same thing that you were
Speaker 2: saying at that. And you know, so this this Kitko article,
Speaker 2: they got a guy who used to be in the
Speaker 2: mining industry and he just keeps repeating over and over again.
Speaker 2: Physical is king, is what he's saying.
Speaker 3: And now you know.
Speaker 2: This EBB and flow with the tariff concern and the
Speaker 2: demand in India. He doesn't mention the point that you made,
Speaker 2: which I think is very important, which is Russia putting
Speaker 2: that in as part of their central bank. But again,
Speaker 2: it's physical, it's not having something that is a digital
Speaker 2: token of a digital asset even I mean as bad
Speaker 2: as paper gold and paper silver, kind of a tokenized
Speaker 2: version of gold that you have to trust the Shanghai
Speaker 2: Gold Exchange. To me, the very name itself makes it
Speaker 2: kind of absurd to think that I could trust these
Speaker 2: people are going to get my money is shanghaied. If
Speaker 2: I want to one to own gold or silver, I
Speaker 2: don't want to put it in that type of thing.
Speaker 2: But the the ETFs that people get into, you know,
Speaker 2: they're so crazy to get into ETFs. It's not just
Speaker 2: gold and silver, it's even worse than they put it
Speaker 2: into bitcoin. But really physical is king, because that's the
Speaker 2: only that you know that you've really got it. We've
Speaker 2: got a couple of questions.
Speaker 5: Here, and Tony you've always been extremely good about pointing
Speaker 5: out and you know, stating on the show, it's like
Speaker 5: you feel bitcoin is a more speculative asset. It's more
Speaker 5: akin to a typical stock in the sense of, well,
Speaker 5: you know, the market is very volatile, it can go
Speaker 5: up and go down, and there's no real way of
Speaker 5: telling what it's going to do. You provide people the
Speaker 5: abilities like if you want bitcoin, I'll sell it to you.
Speaker 5: I'm not necessarily all in on it myself. I'm more
Speaker 5: of a gold and silver guy, and I've always appreciated
Speaker 5: that gold and silver are proven throughout history. Bitcoin, to
Speaker 5: me as always again it's had people have gotten mega
Speaker 5: wealthy off of bitcoin, but in the same way that
Speaker 5: people sometimes pick winning stocks and the market goes crazy.
Speaker 5: So to me, that's always been something that's there. It's
Speaker 5: like every other cryptocurrency. It's just it's again a speculative
Speaker 5: thing you can put money in if you have money
Speaker 5: to burn. To me, it's one of those things like
Speaker 5: if you've got the extra cash and you want to
Speaker 5: fool around with it, that's fine, but there's no telling
Speaker 5: what it's going to do, and there's no guarantee you're
Speaker 5: going to make money. There's no guarantee you're not going
Speaker 5: to lose at all. It's just another speculative asset, whereas
Speaker 5: gold and silver are proven throughout history, They've always been
Speaker 5: money and are likely to always be money unless someone,
Speaker 5: you know, brain wipes everyone on the planet.
Speaker 2: So and mine shares in some corporation that's in Shanghai. Yeah,
Speaker 2: promising you that they really do have gold and silver.
Speaker 2: I mean that that guess us back to the whole
Speaker 2: fiat currency. Yeah, there really is golden fort and we
Speaker 2: promise so sure about that.
Speaker 11: We know JP Morgan has moved their gold desk. They're
Speaker 11: moving it to Shanghai. Maybe they need they need to
Speaker 11: verify a closer to the source. So because that's where
Speaker 11: everything's and especially in that market is flowing. And you know,
Speaker 11: you're right, Travis, it's it's theory. I think a bitcoin
Speaker 11: because of we'ren int a digitized age, and that's I
Speaker 11: think that block chain technology is really important and I've
Speaker 11: been in the space for since twenty sixteen. It is speculative,
Speaker 11: it is volatile, but bitcoin's unique though in the sense
Speaker 11: that there is no company. It's it's not you can
Speaker 11: make an ETF and you can do all the rest,
Speaker 11: but the network is still decentralized. And so the theory
Speaker 11: is in a world of infinite FIOD, it's this finite
Speaker 11: you know, digitized asset if you want to call it that,
Speaker 11: And those two ideas are clashing, and to me, I'm
Speaker 11: always going to go with what is scarce, and especially
Speaker 11: if the network continues to make inroads and there's more
Speaker 11: adoption over time, it may not go parabolic the way
Speaker 11: that it has in the past. You know, when I
Speaker 11: was by, I bought my first bitcoin at four hundred dollars.
Speaker 11: I wish i'd kept it. I didn't. I put it
Speaker 11: through my machines. I've said that many times on shows.
Speaker 11: I was just servicing customers. So looking at how far
Speaker 11: we've gone from buying, you know, four hundred dollars bitcoin
Speaker 11: in twenty sixteen to one hundred and twenty seven thousand
Speaker 11: in October, I just think it's a long we have
Speaker 11: to wait and see. Where as opposed to gold and silver,
Speaker 11: physical physical gold and silver with no counterparty risk, you know,
Speaker 11: holding it like, here's this, I decided, like just for me,
Speaker 11: I'm a dealer, I'm trying to get for my savings.
Speaker 11: I'm trying to get one ounce a day if I
Speaker 11: can do that, if I can afford it, if I
Speaker 11: can you know, buy it from you know, a bulk
Speaker 11: buy or something. But yesterday I just took home a
Speaker 11: Morgan silver dollar, you know, that's what I's here on
Speaker 11: my counter and brought it back to my my loft.
Speaker 11: I just said, I'm going to get one ounce a
Speaker 11: day if I can and put that away, and I
Speaker 11: might start doing some posts on that on what type
Speaker 11: of bounces I'm buying, or you know the history of
Speaker 11: that coin. But to see if I can dollar cost
Speaker 11: I average that we'll see I might not. If silver
Speaker 11: continues to do what it's doing, I might not be
Speaker 11: able to afford it. I'm might have to do do
Speaker 11: half ouncers or you know, three nineteen sixty five. So
Speaker 11: there's there's a lot of the physical demand is I think,
Speaker 11: is what's driving the price. And I think we're just
Speaker 11: getting started.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a couple of comments about that as well.
Speaker 2: Marky Mark says for silver to break its record in
Speaker 2: real terms, it would have to reach one hundred and
Speaker 2: ninety seven dollars to exceed it's nineteen eighty record of
Speaker 2: fifty dollars no ounce, right.
Speaker 11: Yeah, that's what I've long said that. Yeah, as far
Speaker 11: as adjusting that fifty two dollars and fifty cents in
Speaker 11: nineteen eighty, to adjust that in twenty twenty five, all
Speaker 11: are purchasing power, it's about riots by two hure and
Speaker 11: fifty dollars somewhere in there. We don't quite know, yes,
Speaker 11: but I think we're just getting started, because it's only
Speaker 11: a fraction of the real demand that it could be
Speaker 11: once people I think the average person when they start saying, well,
Speaker 11: you know, I got to get in on this silver thing.
Speaker 11: We've seen this in the last few years. I've talked
Speaker 11: about it on your show, where there's been some some
Speaker 11: quiet larger purchases that have gone out in my like
Speaker 11: not just my business, but people that I know and
Speaker 11: across the board especially. There was a Texas billionaire put
Speaker 11: in an order about three years ago for I think
Speaker 11: it was like, you know, half a billion dollars or something,
Speaker 11: and it took dealers all over the country to fill
Speaker 11: that order. Like it wasn't It wasn't like an easy
Speaker 11: thing because the physical supply is so short. And I
Speaker 11: think another thing that's happening right now, just a little
Speaker 11: inside baseball. You look at some of these big wholesalers.
Speaker 11: It's taking dealers weeks to get paid. So like if
Speaker 11: you sell me something and I the closer I can
Speaker 11: get to spot if I can't sell it to an individual,
Speaker 11: if I want to sell it to a wholesaler, I
Speaker 11: might not get paid for a while. So the cash
Speaker 11: flow is kinking up. So you're seeing again it's this
Speaker 11: perfect storm where there's the big demand, prices going up,
Speaker 11: people are selling, and then the liquidity for it drives up.
Speaker 11: It's it's remarkable to see the price staying where it
Speaker 11: is based.
Speaker 2: Off of that. So that brings us a couple of
Speaker 2: questions that are here there Ratisborough, thank you for the tip.
Speaker 2: It says, will we be realistically able to sell silver
Speaker 2: if it goes to goes past a one hundred dollars
Speaker 2: an ounce or will we just have to sit on it?
Speaker 2: He asked, what do you think?
Speaker 11: I think it's a great question. Yeah, every day I'm
Speaker 11: having to adjust my buying prices and I've never been
Speaker 11: in this territory before, and it's not about me. I'm
Speaker 11: not making more money, but I had to drop the
Speaker 11: percentages based off of the speed because I don't have
Speaker 11: unlimited capital. I mean, I'm not black Rock and I'm
Speaker 11: not the US government order owe palaties can't go to
Speaker 11: the printing press and make more dollars. I have a
Speaker 11: finite amount of them than I can use for liquidity.
Speaker 11: So we look at that every single day and it's
Speaker 11: actually it's really good for if you know me, Like
Speaker 11: if you're a listening to the show and you want
Speaker 11: to get in on some silver, maybe just a little bit.
Speaker 11: We've got stuff at Spot, Like I'm able to sell
Speaker 11: right now with a bunch of items just at spots.
Speaker 11: Whatever Spot's trading for, you know, you can always get
Speaker 11: through David Knight Dot Gold. And I'm not doing an infomercial.
Speaker 11: I'm just like that is that is huge that that's
Speaker 11: never happened before. We've always had premiums placed and a
Speaker 11: lot of items still do. But there's a whole bunch
Speaker 11: of stuff right now that we've got that we can
Speaker 11: just do and trade at Spot. And I think that's
Speaker 11: the upside to what's happening right now for the average
Speaker 11: consumer and that wants to get some physical silver, and
Speaker 11: there's a lot more deals in the market. I do
Speaker 11: think no matter what the price goes to, you're always
Speaker 11: going to be able to sell your silver. Okay, I
Speaker 11: wouldn't worry about that. It's just you may not get
Speaker 11: you know, used to back when silver was fifteen dollars
Speaker 11: an ounce. David, I'll give you ninety five percent a
Speaker 11: spot on one hundred ounce bar, I might make three percent,
Speaker 11: you know, especially if if there's no buyers, like on
Speaker 11: a retail side, i'd sell to a wholesaler. Well, right now,
Speaker 11: I'm going to buy eighty five, and I don't want to.
Speaker 11: There's no the wholesaleer is going to take three weeks
Speaker 11: to pay me, so I have to sell to a refiner.
Speaker 11: So it's just there's.
Speaker 2: Well, what you're kind of dealing with is is what
Speaker 2: you know, people who live in countries who have hyperinflation,
Speaker 2: it's kind of what they have to deal with. You know,
Speaker 2: I go out and I buy something, and you know,
Speaker 2: all of a sudden, now you know, the value of
Speaker 2: it goes up, or you know, it's constantly trying to
Speaker 2: adjust to these rapidly changing, volatile prices. And yet what
Speaker 2: we're really seeing here is not hyper inflation of silver,
Speaker 2: not hyper inflation of gold. We're seeing hyper deflation of
Speaker 2: the dollar in a sense, yes, and we're going to
Speaker 2: see a lot more of that because all of the
Speaker 2: things that are there that are making the dollar lose
Speaker 2: value are all accelerating, especially under Trump, and so it's
Speaker 2: really living in a combination of hyper deflation hyper inflation.
Speaker 2: So you've got a job that I don't envy. It
Speaker 2: must be very difficult to do that.
Speaker 5: We still have some more questions and kinds for you
Speaker 5: as well. Tony ten eleven says, question when silver hit
Speaker 5: the highs in nineteen eighty, did they stop all orders
Speaker 5: except sell orders to drive the price down?
Speaker 3: Yeah? What happened?
Speaker 2: That all went down like it was going way up
Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy nine, and then in March in nineteen eighty,
Speaker 2: boom it hits And well, do you remember what the
Speaker 2: mechanism with that was, I mean, was that how did
Speaker 2: they put on the brake?
Speaker 11: What I think a part of that, if I'm correct
Speaker 11: in my history, was there was this there was this
Speaker 11: stoppage of the hunts being able to they halted their
Speaker 11: trading and then they made them liquefy. They dumped that
Speaker 11: silver that they had been hoarding, and then they warehouse
Speaker 11: all over the place they were having to put they
Speaker 11: put that back on the market. It was a swift
Speaker 11: sell off, and it happened this I think perfect storm.
Speaker 11: Well it was it was planned. They put that into motion,
Speaker 11: I think because it was exposing the weakness of the dollars.
Speaker 11: The same thing a less a dramatic you know, a
Speaker 11: less dramatic push was gold at the same time, because
Speaker 11: you remember it's eight hundred dollars a bounce I remember
Speaker 11: in nineteen eighty and then and then collapsed, same thing.
Speaker 11: So I think that was that was a push with
Speaker 11: the powers that be and the interest rates being driven
Speaker 11: to the teens to contract the money supply the dollar
Speaker 11: system and the sell off that was forced. There was
Speaker 11: a forced liquidation. Then nobody picked that that back up.
Speaker 11: I mean no one, no one ever did what the
Speaker 11: Hunts did. And that's not what's happening now. There's no
Speaker 11: one cornering the market. This is literally just twenty five
Speaker 11: years of manipulation falling.
Speaker 3: Part yeah, well that one.
Speaker 2: What they could do is basically because the crash and
Speaker 2: then just wipe the make them liquefy and wipe the
Speaker 2: blood off of the dashboard and resell the car.
Speaker 9: Right yep.
Speaker 11: That flooded the system with the and right now that's
Speaker 11: what's driving the price is the un own and the
Speaker 11: paper you can't paper over it anymore, and the new
Speaker 11: exchanges that are opening up, and then the governmental demands
Speaker 11: and even China is putting silver. This is the technological asset.
Speaker 11: That silver is the monetary asset. You know, all the
Speaker 11: stuff for electrical and solar and everything else. It's all
Speaker 11: the things are happening at once, and I don't think
Speaker 11: that we're at the top of a market. This is
Speaker 11: my opinion and not investment advice.
Speaker 2: And I remember when you were saying, you know, all
Speaker 2: the silver that's in, for example, all these smart bombs
Speaker 2: and stuff like that that they're doing, you know, that's
Speaker 2: just that's not recoverable. You can get the manoparticles that
Speaker 2: want to, but you know, just constantly consuming silver in
Speaker 2: those regards. And this guy who was talking about it said, yeah,
Speaker 2: he peaked like back in twenty fifteen or sixteen at
Speaker 2: nine hundred million ounces a year, and he goes and
Speaker 2: now it's just a tiny fracture of that. If you
Speaker 2: look at recycling and urban mining and all the rest
Speaker 2: of this stuff, it's a teeny tiny fraction of that.
Speaker 2: The minds are only producing about two hundred million and
Speaker 2: less than that with the recycling stuff that's out there.
Speaker 5: Yeah, mister Palm again says thanks Tony, keep sending my
Speaker 5: monthly package. Love my constitutional money. So he's a wolf
Speaker 5: Pack subscriber as well. Yeah, and three a lot of
Speaker 5: well appreciate you.
Speaker 11: Yeah, any those those const we have Constitutional wolf over
Speaker 11: on wolf Pack and I put that together at the
Speaker 11: beginning of this year. It's been successful because we're able
Speaker 11: to pass on a lot of savings, a lot of
Speaker 11: the We buy a lot more ninety percent US silver
Speaker 11: than I've ever bought before, and it's just a way
Speaker 11: to pass on some of those savings and you can
Speaker 11: again dollar cost average and put that away. This is
Speaker 11: all long term stuff. I mean, we're not I'm not
Speaker 11: in a speculative business. I think a lot of this
Speaker 11: is just long term against the dollar. You can't lose
Speaker 11: long term. And look at it took forty five five
Speaker 11: years for silver to hit it's all time high, and
Speaker 11: there was a lot of a lot of manipulation in between.
Speaker 11: You can't do that anymore. I think a lot of
Speaker 11: those bets are off, especially as these nation states. I
Speaker 11: always point back to that, to that press release by
Speaker 11: by Russia, and I said, this is going to move
Speaker 11: things like we haven't seen before in the past. I
Speaker 11: think I was right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, You're right, that was a push. It's not it's
Speaker 2: not one individual, it's not the Hunt brothers out there,
Speaker 2: it's not one country, and it's not one financial I mean,
Speaker 2: got competing countries, competing financial systems that everybody's trying to
Speaker 2: set up here, and it is a response to a
Speaker 2: long standing fraud that's been out there. That's where I
Speaker 2: think history rhymes. You know, you're pointing out that the
Speaker 2: Hunt brothers and others were looking at the fraud of
Speaker 2: the of the dollar, and Bretton Wood's too and all
Speaker 2: the rest of that stuff. But this is broad based.
Speaker 2: It's so many different aspects that are out there, and
Speaker 2: that's why I think it is, you know, a pretty
Speaker 2: pretty safe place to be right now.
Speaker 5: Yeah, we've got the real octos Pook says Morgan. Silver
Speaker 5: dollars are ninety percent silver, ten percent copper. Before it
Speaker 5: can be useful, the copper must be removed, and I
Speaker 5: guess that's if you're trying to melt down the silver
Speaker 5: to use it for technology and what have you, Whereas
Speaker 5: if you know it's ninety percent silver, ten percent copper,
Speaker 5: you're just accounting for that as a form of money.
Speaker 5: Real Octo Spooks says silver rounds ninety nine point nine
Speaker 5: percent silver can be used for anything immediately, and he
Speaker 5: also says gold has never lost value. Goodman attempted to
Speaker 5: make gold too cheap, but there was always a real
Speaker 5: market jewelers for example, to sell to.
Speaker 2: So yeah, that's right.
Speaker 5: Physical metals, there's always a market for them as a
Speaker 5: general rule. You know, I see some people say, you know, well,
Speaker 5: I've got all my investment is in skills. When everything
Speaker 5: goes down. You know, I've got skills. I don't need
Speaker 5: gold or silver, And that's great. Yeah, if you've got skills,
Speaker 5: that's the first thing you need. Food, water, shelter, skills.
Speaker 5: Those are what you need in the immediate aftermath of
Speaker 5: some kind of scenario. But eventually you want something that
Speaker 5: can store value for you. You can't always engage in a
Speaker 5: one to one paired trade when it comes to goods
Speaker 5: and services.
Speaker 2: Well, we're talking about difference between income and wealth, right,
Speaker 2: and between making money and then preserving it in terms,
Speaker 2: that's what money is for, is to preserve what you
Speaker 2: have earned and built so and have that standard of trade.
Speaker 5: Well, those are all the questions and comments for Tony,
Speaker 5: unless we get some last minute under the wire.
Speaker 2: Anything else you want to tell us about what's going on?
Speaker 2: Why is wolf As we come into the end of
Speaker 2: the year.
Speaker 11: There just well mention again end of the year, where
Speaker 11: it's been. It's been such a crazy time. My mind
Speaker 11: has been so occupied just finding ways to offload or
Speaker 11: find liquidity, and I'm not used to this timeline that
Speaker 11: I'm on where taking so long. So a lot of
Speaker 11: things have just been put on the back burner for
Speaker 11: sales or other specials that I normally would have run.
Speaker 11: But I think the most important thing that if you're
Speaker 11: in contact with us, if you are going to get it,
Speaker 11: get into some metals and get some physical delivery. We've
Speaker 11: got things that are some really great deals because the
Speaker 11: closer to SPOT, especially on silver, I can't really do
Speaker 11: that with gold. Gold is a lot faster to get
Speaker 11: liquid on than silver right now, so we're able to
Speaker 11: pass on some things at SPOT, and I think that's
Speaker 11: a that's a deal that may never come back. And
Speaker 11: I will add I think all my analysis over the years,
Speaker 11: I think I got something backwards where I always thought
Speaker 11: that the dealers would be those who could could seek supply,
Speaker 11: and that is very important, but I always looked at
Speaker 11: it there was going to be a run by individuals
Speaker 11: first and then institutions, and I got that backwards. I
Speaker 11: think the institutions are pushing what's happening now, and there
Speaker 11: are some you know in other countries like India where
Speaker 11: individuals are buying, but here in the West, I think
Speaker 11: it's institutions that are pushing it first and pushing the
Speaker 11: supply squeeze, and then I think the next evolution of
Speaker 11: this will be individuals. I don't think you'll ever have
Speaker 11: to worry about that question about what happens if silver
Speaker 11: hits one hundred dollars or plus announcing and be able
Speaker 11: to get liquid. I think you'll be able to get liquid,
Speaker 11: even if you're just doing trading like item for item,
Speaker 11: like you could use it as money. I don't think.
Speaker 11: I don't think it's ever going to be ill liquid.
Speaker 11: It's just as far as the old paradigm. You just
Speaker 11: got to have a trusted dealer that you can do
Speaker 11: business with that in that scenario. So a lot of
Speaker 11: interesting things happening, and not all of it's bad. I
Speaker 11: think some of it's really good for those who've held
Speaker 11: silver for a very long time. And I still think
Speaker 11: these prices are cheap compared to the damage that's been
Speaker 11: done to the dollar's and what's next.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree, I agree.
Speaker 11: I think all bets are off David as far as
Speaker 11: what happens to the money Printer after going into twenty
Speaker 11: twenty six. If you want a prediction, it's it's gonna
Speaker 11: go far.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Trump's going to do everything you can to pedal to
Speaker 2: the metal on lowering interest rates and printing money and
Speaker 2: all the rest of this stuff. Once he gets his
Speaker 2: new fed chair in there, it's going to be crazy.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I absolutely agree.
Speaker 2: We live as the Chinese curse says, may you live
Speaker 2: in interesting times. Well, we're living in an interesting time
Speaker 2: right now, and you're you're having to deal with the
Speaker 2: hyperinflation of gold and silver and the deflation of the
Speaker 2: fiat currency at the same time. Tony, I don't enview
Speaker 2: at all. I know you're very busy, So thank you
Speaker 2: for coming on. Really do appreciate it. And again, folks,
Speaker 2: if you go to David Knight dot Gold, that'll take
Speaker 2: you to Tony Ardban and as we've been saying here,
Speaker 2: you can buy and sol gold and silver. He can
Speaker 2: help you with your IRA, and he can also set
Speaker 2: up a metal IRA and especially something that is unique
Speaker 2: to Tony, which is the Wolf Pack, where you can
Speaker 2: dollar cost average this stuff out, gradually save your money
Speaker 2: and get it into gold and silver with Wolf pack.
Speaker 2: You pick the teer that you're in and of course
Speaker 2: you don't have to you can change that at any
Speaker 2: point in time. You can even go in and do
Speaker 2: wolf Pack on a one off, as he's pointed out
Speaker 2: in the past. So we do appreciate that kind of
Speaker 2: flexibility that's there at great customer service from Tony.
Speaker 5: Appreciate it, huh. And the shop in Dennison is incredibly nice.
Speaker 5: As I said, my wife and son and I got
Speaker 5: to stop in check out the shop. See Tony for
Speaker 5: a bit. It's very nice shop. If you're in the area,
Speaker 5: go check it out.
Speaker 11: I never use to me that picture I totally forgot.
Speaker 5: We got on the road and then everything. Our son
Speaker 5: got to take a picture with Tony. I'll to send
Speaker 5: it to you. Things got crazy. We found a puppy
Speaker 5: on the road. As we were well, we found a
Speaker 5: couple with puppies. We adopted the puppy.
Speaker 2: Things.
Speaker 5: Things got busy.
Speaker 3: So Tonny, in.
Speaker 2: Your in your bank, do you have gold all over
Speaker 2: the place like Donald Trump in his old office.
Speaker 11: That's not really my taste. Yeah, we we we have
Speaker 11: a bank and it's I love the location. I'm glad
Speaker 11: that Travis was able to come by and his wife
Speaker 11: got to see the baby boy. So it's happy for that.
Speaker 11: We we have a we have a nice family place.
Speaker 11: I don't have any gold plate anything. I don't have
Speaker 11: any I have not I have not wasted one ounce
Speaker 11: of capital for any sort of esthetic. Yeah, it's all
Speaker 11: based off of functionality. So I think we're gonna need
Speaker 11: every ounce of that functionality here in the few years.
Speaker 2: So yeah, Trump is all about wasting assets, I think.
Speaker 5: But you're not going to find a solid gold toilet
Speaker 5: a Wisewolf gold and silver, but you will find some
Speaker 5: excellent deals there at Davidknight dot Gold.
Speaker 2: Yes, thank you very much again, David Knight I Gold
Speaker 2: will take you to Tony Ordban's and Wisewolf Gold. Thank you, Tony.
Speaker 2: Appreciate you. Coming on, we're going to take a quick
Speaker 2: break and we're gonna hear from you con Cornelias shit again,
Speaker 2: because I really do think that gold and silver are
Speaker 2: still on sale. I mean not as much as it
Speaker 2: was last year with the Trump Mania, but I think
Speaker 2: they're still on sale. I think, and when you look
Speaker 2: at one bank after the other, they're all looking at
Speaker 2: a pretty big appreciation this next year.
Speaker 3: And I haven't.
Speaker 2: Even when they're making their cases, most of them are
Speaker 2: not even really talking about Trump's federal Reserve pick and
Speaker 2: what He's going to do with that. So I think
Speaker 2: there's a lot that's still there in the mix. Thank you, Tony,
Speaker 2: appreciate it he did.
Speaker 9: That's right, boys and girls, there's a post election sale
Speaker 9: on silver and gold. Trump euphoria has caused a nip
Speaker 9: in silver and gold. It's time to buy some medals
Speaker 9: with vat doors before they come to there. Since his
Speaker 9: go to David Knight dot gold to get in touch
Speaker 9: with the wise wolf himself, Tony Harterburn.
Speaker 7: He knows where to look to find silver and gold.
Speaker 7: Look yug bed.
Speaker 16: A.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the David Night Show.
Speaker 14: Here news now at apsradionews dot com or get the
Speaker 14: APS Radio app and never miss another story.
Speaker 3: Welcome back, folks.
Speaker 5: We got a couple more comments here that weren't about Tony,
Speaker 5: so we've got to finish him off before we move on.
Speaker 3: To the things.
Speaker 5: The Syrian girl says, hope this necessitates the stupid criminal
Speaker 5: lawyer to seek another profession. It probably won't. They have
Speaker 5: no shame and aren't held to standards.
Speaker 2: That's right, Yeah. Yeah, that's the prosecutor who is mixing
Speaker 2: in aislop and hallucinations into his indictments to keep a
Speaker 2: guy some California gun control laws that were violated supposedly
Speaker 2: and try to keep him in jail for months without bail,
Speaker 2: as if he had killed somebody or something.
Speaker 5: I imagine the California gun control laws are so ridiculous
Speaker 5: and absurd that violating them is incredibly easy on an incident.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that's right, not as though he'd killed someone. If
Speaker 4: he'd killed someone, they would have let him go.
Speaker 5: Yeah, California, if you don't you know, if you only
Speaker 5: stole nine hundred and ninety nine dollars from a shop
Speaker 5: over and over again, he could be out on the
Speaker 5: street instantly, whatever their arbitrary designation for a felony is.
Speaker 5: Jerry Alatalo says Dan Bongino's impression of Shemp from The
Speaker 5: Three Stooges.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 5: I'd be careful what you say. Man, he's got those
Speaker 5: fists of fury. He might track you down. You might
Speaker 5: get a piece of that sidekick.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you're talking to me.
Speaker 2: You're talking to me, Well, you must be talking to me.
Speaker 3: He is Robert de Niro from Taxi Driver.
Speaker 2: I don't know, but yeah, we look at Dan Mangino
Speaker 2: and cash Matelevi theon If you throw in Joe Rogan,
Speaker 2: I think you do have the Three Stooges and I
Speaker 2: would make my vote for I don't know who would
Speaker 2: be Curly.
Speaker 3: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I've got an amazing clip coming up here from Joe
Speaker 2: Rogan which is definitely in Three Stooges territory. It's Joe Rogan.
Speaker 5: But Doug Double O seven says how many songs are
Speaker 5: on the Christmas Night album?
Speaker 2: You know, I'm not even sure it's right around twenty,
Speaker 2: give or take a song or two, because we took
Speaker 2: most of them out of the deck and you know,
Speaker 2: after the Christmas season last year, and some of them
Speaker 2: have been moved over into another folder, but we haven't
Speaker 2: gotten the hall back in. That's on my list of
Speaker 2: things to do today that I need to try to
Speaker 2: do is get these all the Christmas songs back. So
Speaker 2: we've just been playing like a subset of about five
Speaker 2: or six of them that were still in the deck.
Speaker 2: So we'll get those the rest of those in there,
Speaker 2: but it's about twenty or so, I think, I believe
Speaker 2: you're right, it's twenty or twenty one.
Speaker 5: I think it's in that very close area.
Speaker 2: Because we did add I'll be home for Christmas and
Speaker 2: home for the holidays. We did add that and to
Speaker 2: the original ones. That's why I'm a little bit FuG
Speaker 2: fozzy foggy, a little bit foggy in terms of my
Speaker 2: speaking as well.
Speaker 5: So well, we've only got thirty five more minutes here, so.
Speaker 2: Yeah, let's get onto this. Joe Rogan has now been
Speaker 2: attending church in Austin. It was basically this Christian apologist
Speaker 2: West Huff. I've never seen him before, but he went
Speaker 2: on with Joe Rogan. He became an instant celebrity. And
Speaker 2: you did a good job of answering Joe's questions. And
Speaker 2: so Joe's going to the same church he's going to,
Speaker 2: and he says, I really like it. He said, the
Speaker 2: nicest people you'll ever meet, he said. He put it
Speaker 2: in a distinctive way. He said, they are the nicest
Speaker 2: effing people you'll ever meet. He says, they're really kind,
Speaker 2: and they're even nice out of church. When you leave
Speaker 2: the church parking lot, everybody lets you go in front
Speaker 2: of them. There's no one honking in the church parking lot.
Speaker 2: It works, and so then he starts talking about with
Speaker 2: or not he thinks the Bible is true, and he says,
Speaker 2: besides being moved by the kindness of the people that
Speaker 2: are there and how generous they are in terms of traffic.
Speaker 2: He says, well, I don't think it's a myth. He says,
Speaker 2: I don't believe the whole thing is true. However, he
Speaker 2: thinks that it's been mixed in. He says, ancient history,
Speaker 2: and there's a lot of truth in it, but he
Speaker 2: doesn't think that it is all true, to which I
Speaker 2: have to say, well, if it is true, you know,
Speaker 2: you kind of get back in the same territory that C. S.
Speaker 2: Lewis said about Jesus. He said, you can't say that
Speaker 2: he's a great moral teacher. You can't really just say
Speaker 2: that the Bible is history. You know, Jesus is either
Speaker 2: a liar, lunatic or lord. Right. And if you think
Speaker 2: that the Bible is accurate, so much of it is
Speaker 2: something that was delivered to people who didn't nobody was
Speaker 2: witnessing what God did with creation. So either Moses just
Speaker 2: made that up or it actually was something that was
Speaker 2: from God. If God delivered that information to communicate with us.
Speaker 2: Do you think he's able to preserve it and to
Speaker 2: make sure that that communication is not going to be corrupted.
Speaker 2: That's the whole issue that I have with people who
Speaker 2: want to question the credibility of the Bible. And there's
Speaker 2: a lot who do that. You know, the Muslims do that.
Speaker 2: Of course, the Mormons do that. And so I think
Speaker 2: that when you look at the Bible, I think it
Speaker 2: hangs together, and it hangs together with facts. It hangs together.
Speaker 2: It's consistent with secular history, it's consistent with archaeology and
Speaker 2: other things like that that are there, and it's also
Speaker 2: consistent with what we see in terms of the universe
Speaker 2: and with science. But he had another really interesting take here,
Speaker 2: I thought, and he's kind of as he's thinking about
Speaker 2: these issues. This is Joe Rogan on what he thinks
Speaker 2: about AI and Jesus.
Speaker 17: Jesus was born out of a virgin mother. What's more
Speaker 17: virgin than a computer. If Jesus does return, even if
Speaker 17: Jesus was a physical person in the past, you don't
Speaker 17: think that he could return as artificial intelligence absolutely returns Jesus,
Speaker 17: not just return as Jesus turn as Jesus with all
Speaker 17: the powers.
Speaker 5: Of Jesus, combine Tesla's Optimist robot and the best foundational
Speaker 5: artificial intelligence model or whatever.
Speaker 17: It reads your mind, and it loves you, and it
Speaker 17: wants you. It doesn't care if you kill it, because
Speaker 17: it's going to just go be with God again.
Speaker 5: This is why I'm really glad those people in Austin
Speaker 5: are so nice, because.
Speaker 2: They're maybe they're nice enough that they can justly talk
Speaker 2: and instruct with him.
Speaker 5: Because this is Yeah, it makes me roll my eyes
Speaker 5: and I that is one area where I routinely fail.
Speaker 5: I am not as kind as I should be. Joe
Speaker 5: Rogan is obviously seeking something. He can feel that the
Speaker 5: universe is not as it seems, it's not what he's
Speaker 5: been told, and he is desperate for something, and he
Speaker 5: is desperate for Christ, whether he knows it or not.
Speaker 2: And I would just say to him, you know, he
Speaker 2: shared that he's been reading the Book of Revelation with
Speaker 2: his daughter and he told her nobody knows how the
Speaker 2: prophecies in that book will play out. Well, see, that's
Speaker 2: the other thing too. Don't start with that. That's not
Speaker 2: the starting place. And I think it's not just Joe
Speaker 2: that has that issue. I think we've got a lot
Speaker 2: of Christians who start and who major in prophecies and
Speaker 2: ignore the more fundamental truths that are there that would
Speaker 2: I think, help you to understand the prophecies that are there.
Speaker 5: I think a lot of people fall into the trap
Speaker 5: of they want secret, hidden knowledge.
Speaker 3: It's a cult.
Speaker 5: The occult has all this like, oh, well, there's levels
Speaker 5: to it, and you figure this out, and there's secrets
Speaker 5: to on earth and it's buried. You got to dig
Speaker 5: and dig, and the gospel is very straightforward.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 5: The gospel is Jesus was born and he died for
Speaker 5: our sins, and if you believe in him, your sins
Speaker 5: are forgiven.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 5: And it's an affront to people who are intelligent because
Speaker 5: they're like, that can't be it. There has to be
Speaker 5: more than I have to unearth and dig for it,
Speaker 5: and it's just no. The gospel is meant so that
Speaker 5: even a child can understand it.
Speaker 2: And if you want to dig for things that, I
Speaker 2: think if you look at intelligent design and things like that,
Speaker 2: that is really you know, the hidden hand of God.
Speaker 2: I find that to be much more inspiring than to
Speaker 2: go back and look at all the prophecies that have
Speaker 2: been fulfilled over time. And I think really prophecies are
Speaker 2: really only understood for sure in terms of hindsight. But
Speaker 2: we can take a look at DNA, and we can
Speaker 2: look at the intelligent design and the specificity of different
Speaker 2: animals and how there each of these animals is a
Speaker 2: completely unique system that's been put there. You know, you
Speaker 2: have a woodpecker as an example, that's always used kinhem.
Speaker 2: It's got very specialized feet that let it perch vertically
Speaker 2: on the trunk, and it's got specialized beacon shock absorbers
Speaker 2: and things like that too as it's hammering its head
Speaker 2: against the against the trunk, and then even has a
Speaker 2: specialized tongue. None of those things would make any sense
Speaker 2: and would help. They might even be detrimental if they
Speaker 2: were to develop one at a time. It all comes
Speaker 2: together as a unified whole. And when you see that
Speaker 2: type of thing and you see that in nature, to me,
Speaker 2: that is something that is a real faith builder. That's
Speaker 2: what he should be going over with his daughter if
Speaker 2: he wants to do things, rather than somebody's interpretation of revelation.
Speaker 2: And the problem is is that you know, just as
Speaker 2: he is, he sees the people there at this church
Speaker 2: and how friendly they are to him, and that makes
Speaker 2: an impression on him, and we should always be concerned
Speaker 2: about that how we come across the people. We don't
Speaker 2: want to, however, surrender truth or our principles just because
Speaker 2: we want people to like us. That's what the left
Speaker 2: wing LBGT churches do, that type of thing. However, we
Speaker 2: should be concerned if what we are doing is hypocritical.
Speaker 2: In other words, you know, if you come out of
Speaker 2: church and start you'll let people in the marking lite.
Speaker 2: Maybe that's not the thing to do, and maybe that's
Speaker 2: not the way that we should be representing Christ, because
Speaker 2: we are ambassadors for Christ and hopefully we would like
Speaker 2: to be people to be able to see Christ in us.
Speaker 2: And we need to look at ourselves and see if
Speaker 2: we are reflecting Christ. And that's one of the reasons
Speaker 2: why I feel compelled to speak out against this Zionism
Speaker 2: that is overwhelming parts of the Christian Church in America,
Speaker 2: because when people look at genocide and they look at
Speaker 2: us as we talk about the love of Christ and
Speaker 2: all these other things, how do those things gel with
Speaker 2: each other? Are we being a reproach to Christ when
Speaker 2: we embrace that type of thing. I think we are
Speaker 2: as a matter of fact. J. D. Hall went into
Speaker 2: depth on one particular guy who was being used by
Speaker 2: Mark Levin to attack Tucker Carlson as Tucker caralson being
Speaker 2: worse than a Nazi, and he goes as well, I
Speaker 2: looked at this, and he said, clearly this is hyperbole
Speaker 2: on the part of Mark Levin. But he said, Mark
Speaker 2: Levin is saying, you know, other Christians are saying that
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson is like that. And so he said, so
Speaker 2: investigate who these other Christians were. And he said, at
Speaker 2: first I just didn't believe it. But my second reaction
Speaker 2: was curiosity. He said, Levin is not Mark Levin brother
Speaker 2: is not stupid. He knows what he's doing. So why
Speaker 2: is a prominent Jewish neo khon using the words of
Speaker 2: a supposed Christian minister to make a nuclear accusation against
Speaker 2: a fellow Christian or somebody professes to be a Christian?
Speaker 2: He said, who is this Christian who allows himself to
Speaker 2: be turned into a political weapon for others? Who is
Speaker 2: this minister who takes his supposed spiritual authority and bends
Speaker 2: it into a tool for smearing Christian brothers to curry
Speaker 2: favor with politicians and a foreign government. So so I started digging.
Speaker 2: What I found was that this guy that he was quoting,
Speaker 2: his name is Mike Evans, and he's unfound. He wasn't
Speaker 2: a minister, he's not a pastor, he's not a prophet.
Speaker 2: He's not even an evangelist, he said. What I found
Speaker 2: was that he was a political asset disguised as a
Speaker 2: Christian leader. What I found was a man who had
Speaker 2: constructed his identity around servicing the interests of a foreign
Speaker 2: nation and using theology as a disguise.
Speaker 3: He said.
Speaker 2: His organization is called Friends of Zion, of course abbreviates
Speaker 2: sometimes as FOZ. The Skuy's a wizard of Foz. He
Speaker 2: is the man behind the curtain, literally he goes. His
Speaker 2: line about the pulpit must be stronger than propaganda struck
Speaker 2: me as pure projection he was describing himself. He was
Speaker 2: not condemning propaganda, he was confessing it because the Friends
Speaker 2: of Zion enterprise that he built is on propaganda. It
Speaker 2: has built on curated narratives, government favored storylines, state approved history,
Speaker 2: and a political theology that exists only to sanctify the
Speaker 2: interests of the Israeli government. Evans is steeped in propaganda
Speaker 2: all the way down to the bone. His museum is
Speaker 2: a propaganda platform. His media center in Jerusalem is a
Speaker 2: propaganda hub. His political relationships are propaganda channels. His awards
Speaker 2: are propaganda rituals disguised as honors. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 2: earlier this year, guests who he rewarded, he rewarded.
Speaker 3: The guy who.
Speaker 2: Said, Well, a lot of people don't know if I'm
Speaker 2: an ambassador for America or if I'm an ambassador for Israel.
Speaker 18: This is a nation that is the most resilient I've
Speaker 18: ever seen on Earth. It may sound a little bit
Speaker 18: this afternoon as if I'm almost speaking on behalf of
Speaker 18: Israel rather than the US, but I want to explain
Speaker 18: that part of my advocacy in our relationship is because
Speaker 18: if you came to my house tonight for dinner, and
Speaker 18: you came in and you said, oh, Mike, we like you,
Speaker 18: We really think the world of you. We just enjoy
Speaker 18: being with you. I'm so excited to be here with
Speaker 18: you and have dinner with you. But your wife, we
Speaker 18: can't stand her. We don't like her a bit. I
Speaker 18: hope she's not going to be at the table. I
Speaker 18: would say, well, she will be.
Speaker 2: You won't be get out because.
Speaker 18: If you were to insult my partner, you have insulted me.
Speaker 2: His partner is Israel. And when he talks about Israel
Speaker 2: being a blessing, he's talking about the things that they've
Speaker 2: done for him. I think this is the guy who
Speaker 2: met with the preeminent terrorist trader of our time, Jonathan Pollard,
Speaker 2: the guy that was let out of jail by Trump,
Speaker 2: who was allowed to go back to Israel. And of
Speaker 2: course Mike Kukabee can't do enough for Israel. And as
Speaker 2: he's pointing out, he says, these honors that are given
Speaker 2: out there are all two politicians about politicians, and it's
Speaker 2: all about gaining political favor.
Speaker 18: I get asked all the time because I'm a Christian,
Speaker 18: and they say, well, why are you so supportive of
Speaker 18: the Jewish people. I said, you can be Jewish, you
Speaker 18: don't have to have anything to do with Christians, but
Speaker 18: you can't be a Christian and not understand that your
Speaker 18: entire faith is built on the foundation of Judaism. So
Speaker 18: for Christians, we look at this as an obligation, a
Speaker 18: moral debt that we must repay. And therefore I don't
Speaker 18: understand anyone who says, I'm a Christian, but I don't
Speaker 18: really want to support the Jews.
Speaker 2: Well, how can you do that?
Speaker 18: But it is not the view of those of us
Speaker 18: who are what I would call biblical believers that accept
Speaker 18: that what the Scripture says about the Jewish people and
Speaker 18: Genesis twelve, those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who.
Speaker 2: Curse Israel will be cursed. Doesn't say that.
Speaker 18: I say, there's a miracle every day in this country.
Speaker 2: Says to Abraham, I'll bless those who bless you, the
Speaker 2: singular person, and through you all nations will be blessed.
Speaker 2: How will they be blessed through Christ? Did you hear
Speaker 2: him say?
Speaker 6: You know?
Speaker 2: You'll hear him say that the Jews or God's chosen people,
Speaker 2: the people who reject, who choose to reject God, are
Speaker 2: His chosen people. That was never true, even of Israel
Speaker 2: and biblical times. But getting back to Evans, Evans Organization
Speaker 2: is not a ministry. It's not for it is a
Speaker 2: foreign influence platform that is operating under the cover of
Speaker 2: Christian Zionism. The Friends of Zion Museum sits not in
Speaker 2: a church, but at the center of Jerusalem's state tourism framework.
Speaker 2: It is officially promoted by the Ministry of Tourism, it's
Speaker 2: endorsed by the Ministry of Jerusalem and Heritage, and it
Speaker 2: is highlighted by the Jerusalem Department Authority. No foreign ministry
Speaker 2: anywhere on the planet is granted this level of state
Speaker 2: integration unless it serves a national purpose. And take a
Speaker 2: look at the difference between how they treat this guy's
Speaker 2: museum and how they treat Christians, actual Christians and drew
Speaker 2: some more Christian churches and that type of thing a
Speaker 2: world of difference. Evans built his museum to glorify Christian
Speaker 2: Zionists as saviors of Israel. The Israeli state embraced it
Speaker 2: because that narrative is politically useful. Politically useful, it reinforces
Speaker 2: the idea that Christian support is not just sentimental but historical,
Speaker 2: that's the point of the Covenental and morally mandated. It
Speaker 2: creates a felt obligation in Christians to defend Israel even
Speaker 2: when Israel acts unjustly. And it wraps all of this
Speaker 2: in a religious vocabulary that discourages dissent. And when you
Speaker 2: look at people like Mike Huckabee. He's constantly talking about Israel,
Speaker 2: not about Christ.
Speaker 3: That's the key.
Speaker 2: That's the replacement theology, folks. The replacement theology is replacing
Speaker 2: Christ with the state of Israel. This is propaganda, carefully
Speaker 2: engineered messaging designed to shape public opinion. Again, this is J. D.
Speaker 2: Hall who did the research on this and the different
Speaker 2: aspects of what Mike Evans is doing. So the relationship
Speaker 2: doesn't stop at tourism and cultural promotion. The Israeli military
Speaker 2: itself utilizes the Friends of Zion Museum through the Education Corps.
Speaker 2: The idea of soldiers are brought to FOZ as part
Speaker 2: of their educational programming, where they're shown a curated story
Speaker 2: of Christian solidarity that reinforces the idea of an international
Speaker 2: alliance that is rooted in faith, faith, and what faith
Speaker 2: in Christ, That's what my faith is in so FOZ.
Speaker 2: He reinforces a worldview that the Israeli military leadership wants
Speaker 2: soldiers to internalize, and that worldview says that global Christianity,
Speaker 2: especially the American evangelical sector, is the unshakable ally whose
Speaker 2: political pressures can be counted on when Israel faces criticism
Speaker 2: or conflict. The museum is a classroom for that doctrine.
Speaker 2: And of course, you know when we look at this,
Speaker 2: you know the guy besides Huckabee, the guy who has
Speaker 2: said I want to be the number one defender of Israel,
Speaker 2: course is Ted Cruz. And what did he recently do.
Speaker 2: He basically said, anybody that talks about the USS liberty
Speaker 2: is anti Semitic. And what was that? That was an
Speaker 2: American intelligence ship is actually ANSSA that was repeatedly attacked
Speaker 2: by the Israeli government and they could see the American
Speaker 2: flag that was there. There were radio calls and all
Speaker 2: the rest of the stuff. A continual attack, a betrayal,
Speaker 2: just like what Jonathan Pollard did, and just like what
Speaker 2: Israel did with the intelligence that Jonathan Pollard did, betraying America.
Speaker 2: And yet don't talk about that, said Ted Cruz, because
Speaker 2: then if you do, you're racist. How pathetic that is?
Speaker 2: That is as pathetic as a left When they see
Speaker 2: you they don't like your politics or your economics, they
Speaker 2: call you racists.
Speaker 6: Poison is spreading.
Speaker 19: There are pastors who love Israel, who think all is fine,
Speaker 19: and my message to them is go and talk to
Speaker 19: the teenagers and your congregation. Go and talk to the
Speaker 19: twenty somethings in your congregation, because they're picking up their
Speaker 19: phone and they're watching TikTok and they're watching Instagram, and
Speaker 19: they're hearing this message being driven and it is resonating.
Speaker 19: And if you want an illustration of this, several weeks ago,
Speaker 19: Jade Vance was down at Old miss at a turning
Speaker 19: Point gathering and one kid got up, got the asked
Speaker 19: this viciously anti submitic question. The most horrifying thing to
Speaker 19: me is what happened in the second later, which is
Speaker 19: the crowd erupted in applause. Not everybody. My guess is
Speaker 19: twenty to thirty percent of the kids there were applauding
Speaker 19: the viciously anti semitic question. A week or two later,
Speaker 19: there was another event, what was the question with Eric
Speaker 19: and Laura Trump at Auburn University. A kid got up
Speaker 19: and said, I can do even better and asked such
Speaker 19: an anti Semitic question.
Speaker 6: It was filled with lies.
Speaker 19: Every word of the question was a lie, including N,
Speaker 19: but and THEE. And again instantaneously the reaction was the same.
Speaker 19: Twenty to thirty percent of the kids began cheering. Now
Speaker 19: here's the warning sign to hear. This was not a
Speaker 19: gathering at Berkeley, This was not a gathering at Yale.
Speaker 19: This was an old miss an Auburn. These are a
Speaker 19: bunch of big, old frat guys that are just looking
Speaker 19: to make a friend on Saturday night, who have heard
Speaker 19: the message.
Speaker 6: We are such a team.
Speaker 19: We're so polarized, we're so bifurcated that what worries me
Speaker 19: is young people that get the message, oh, our team
Speaker 19: we hate Israel.
Speaker 2: That is dangerous, you know, it's dangerous. Is the demagoghory
Speaker 2: of somebody like Ted Cruz. You kept saying, well, what
Speaker 2: is the question? What is the question? Demogogue is not
Speaker 2: going to tell you why the question is and why
Speaker 2: I got a pause because the question was about the
Speaker 2: USS celebrity. That is not racism. That is pure demagoghrey
Speaker 2: on the part of Ted Cruz. And when we look
Speaker 2: at that kind of betrayal by our best friend, that
Speaker 2: is blessing us. You know, it's very much like what
Speaker 2: happened with Jonathan Pollard and Benjamin Netanya, who who is
Speaker 2: an ally has been a long term multi decades. He's
Speaker 2: been a partner with Mike Evans, who's running this friends
Speaker 2: of zion thing. And of course it's Benjamin nett Yahu
Speaker 2: who welcomes Jonathan Pollard brought back on a private plane
Speaker 2: by Miriam Addelson. Here as he gets down, he kisses
Speaker 2: the ground because he's so happy to be outside of America.
Speaker 2: This is the land that he loves. And how he
Speaker 2: betrayed America. It's that kind of betrayal that we're talking about.
Speaker 2: And so if you talk about genocide, which is what
Speaker 2: it's called when you decide that you're going to kill
Speaker 2: everybody in an area so that you can have their
Speaker 2: land or whatever, which is clearly what's going on. They
Speaker 2: say that over and over again. And so we recently
Speaker 2: had a woman who was another well known Zionist, and
Speaker 2: she was talking about, we got to stop just mowing
Speaker 2: the lawn. What she's talking about is we don't just
Speaker 2: go out and mow the lawn and mow these people
Speaker 2: down and kill them. We got to kill them once
Speaker 2: and for all. You know, their version of a final solution.
Speaker 20: Oh, there is a spirit, a burrow of broad in
Speaker 20: Israel which people have not seen before, a spirit among
Speaker 20: younger people. They will not be diverted from defeating the enemy.
Speaker 20: It is no longer enough simply to what was called
Speaker 20: mowing the lawn to keep the enemy down on the
Speaker 20: basis that they're always going to be there and we're
Speaker 20: always going to fight them.
Speaker 11: No enough.
Speaker 20: We will now fight to defeat the enemy, because we
Speaker 20: know that only defeating the enemy is what we should
Speaker 20: be doing. And there's been a realization, there's been a
Speaker 20: realization that this idea of mowing the lawn, this idea
Speaker 20: of not going too far, this idea of doing what
Speaker 20: the world all the way, that is gallant mentality, that
Speaker 20: is diaspora mentality, that is trying to please and.
Speaker 16: Appease the world.
Speaker 20: But the world, we now understand from what we're being
Speaker 20: living through and are still living through, the world cannot
Speaker 20: be appeased. It has to be fought. It has been described,
Speaker 20: and I think most.
Speaker 5: How dare the world object the genocide.
Speaker 20: From Talmud to Tanach, by which I mean this, The Talmud,
Speaker 20: that collection of rabbinical ordinances, which justifiably can be said
Speaker 20: to have kept the Israel, kept the Jewish people alive
Speaker 20: since their exile from the Land of Israel, is very
Speaker 20: much a diaspora mentality. It is a mentality which looks inward,
Speaker 20: which says we are up against a world.
Speaker 2: Which ignores torahurselves.
Speaker 20: The Tanach is full of stories of the Jewish people
Speaker 20: of antiquity, fighting, fighting real battles, killing real people in
Speaker 20: defense of their nation and their people and their faith.
Speaker 20: And that is what has to be done. And I
Speaker 20: see that what we are seeing now in this war
Speaker 20: that has been fought is the resurrection of the Tanach
Speaker 20: jew the return of the heroic davidic warrior, strength not weakness.
Speaker 2: And again, what they want to tell you if you're
Speaker 2: a Christian is that they're all about Torah. We don't
Speaker 2: care about that at all, is therebinical writings Kanak? And
Speaker 2: yet you know you have Ted Cruz is concerned because
Speaker 2: you had people applaud when there was a question about
Speaker 2: the USS liberty. And yet when she says we're going
Speaker 2: to mow down these people and kill them all off
Speaker 2: once and for all, she got a lot of applause.
Speaker 2: What is the issue of that? Well, this partnership that
Speaker 2: Mike Evans has with the IDF, with their museum and
Speaker 2: their educational thing there, he says that the IDEAF participates
Speaker 2: in the Friends of Zion programming. One of the clearest
Speaker 2: proofs that the Ministry is not merely adjacent to Israel
Speaker 2: Israeli state power. It is a part of Israeli state power.
Speaker 2: Friends of Zion is more than a cultural outpost, more
Speaker 2: than a museum. It is a weight bearing pillar of
Speaker 2: the political architecture that binds American evangelical support Israeli lobbying objectives.
Speaker 2: Mike Evans has spent decades cultivating relationships with the American
Speaker 2: political operators, presidents, and members of Congress. He has spent decades,
Speaker 2: since the nineteen eighties, cultivating an even closer relationship of
Speaker 2: Benjamin Netanyahu, a relationship that Israeli journalists have documented since
Speaker 2: the nineteen eighties. Netanyahu's repeated appearances at Friends of Zion
Speaker 2: events are not sentimental gestures. They are visible performances of
Speaker 2: a political alliance. Of course, where do he get started
Speaker 2: in the nineteen eighties, Well, if you go back and
Speaker 2: look at what Mike Evans was doing back in the
Speaker 2: nineteen eighties, he was pushing the Iraq war because that's
Speaker 2: what Netanyahu did, and then he's pushing more recently, the
Speaker 2: Iran war because that's what Netanyahu wants. And so he
Speaker 2: pushes all of these different wars. He's got all of
Speaker 2: these prophecy and Christian ministries that are instead of pushing
Speaker 2: lies about weapons mass destruction, they're pushing lies about biblical prophecy.
Speaker 2: That's really what is happening here. They get us into
Speaker 2: these wars so they deliver the friends of Zion what
Speaker 2: no formal lawby can deliver. It delivers millions of deeply
Speaker 2: loyal evangelical voters who accept Israel's political interest as if
Speaker 2: they were Christian moral duties, which is exactly what Mike
Speaker 2: Huckabee is constantly saying.
Speaker 13: The ambassador has a very interesting view of antisemitisms. Russ
Speaker 13: who grew up in America, there was anti Semitism. Of course,
Speaker 13: I've experience. Of all experiences, the ambassador has a very
Speaker 13: interesting view of them. He says, people are You can't
Speaker 13: understand that the Semitism, it's people who are antisemitic. It's
Speaker 13: because they're against s thought, against the Bansulid, and we
Speaker 13: are represented as his people and that's why they're anti Semitic.
Speaker 11: Otherwise it doesn't make any sense. Interesting you, it's interesting, Hue.
Speaker 18: There's another view that since we could say that it's
Speaker 18: the chosen people so people are who are you?
Speaker 2: What are you? Were taking bigas.
Speaker 18: Chosen people, And that's part of it, is that because
Speaker 18: you are the chosen people, given a chosen place for
Speaker 18: a chosen purpose. And if someone is angry at God,
Speaker 18: he'll be angry at the people who represent him.
Speaker 2: So well, I would say, maybe it works this way.
Speaker 2: Since the Lord Jesus Christ is God who has come
Speaker 2: to earth. Perhaps the people who hate, who hate God,
Speaker 2: who hate the Lord Jesus Christ, perhaps that's why they
Speaker 2: attack people who do love the Lord and call them racist,
Speaker 2: call them anti Semitic. It is your moral duty as
Speaker 2: a Christian, as your moral duty period to understand who
Speaker 2: the Lord of the universe is and to not side
Speaker 2: with those who oppose him in every way. When FOZ
Speaker 2: gives its Friends of Zion Award, the recipients are overwhelmingly
Speaker 2: political leaders, not ministers or theologians. These awards are distributed
Speaker 2: to sitting presidents, prime ministers, monarchs, foreign policy actors, ambassadors
Speaker 2: like Huckabee, who function as a seal of evangelical legitimacy,
Speaker 2: a public blessing that signals to millions of American Christians
Speaker 2: that this person is a defender of God's chosen people.
Speaker 2: And again it is pure politics with a thin veneer
Speaker 2: of false theology. That's what we're talking about here. Foz
Speaker 2: can mobilize pastors who will spend consecutive Sundays preaching in
Speaker 2: favor of Israeli government policy. He says, as hard as
Speaker 2: I looked, I couldn't find a single example of Friends
Speaker 2: of Zion or Mike Evans ever preaching Jesus Christ or
Speaker 2: his Gospel to israelis nothing, not a hint of gospel
Speaker 2: witness whatsoever. Can you imagine all of those millions from
Speaker 2: evangelicals in America thinking that they're doing something loving when
Speaker 2: the most loving thing of all would be to share
Speaker 2: the good News that is completely absent from their work.
Speaker 2: All these people who say they love Israel and don't
Speaker 2: talk to them about Christ, don't bother them with that.
Speaker 2: They're already God's chosen people. You know, they're saved because
Speaker 2: of their DNA or something that is not Christian. That
Speaker 2: is not true. And anybody who says that has left
Speaker 2: the faith. They have faith and politics not in Christ.
Speaker 2: Before Friends of Zion existed as a brand, Mike Evans
Speaker 2: operated the Jerusalem Prayer Team, an organization that raised money
Speaker 2: for the municipal projects in Jerusalem, including direct fundraising for
Speaker 2: the New Jerusalem Foundation, and the leadership of then Mayor
Speaker 2: Ahud Ohmayer. Okay, he was the He later became Prime
Speaker 2: Minister if you remember his name, just recently came up
Speaker 2: as one as the controller for who Jeffrey Epstein. This
Speaker 2: is what you're buying into the Epstein masad stuff. Friends
Speaker 2: of Zion tell its donors that their contributions bless God's
Speaker 2: chosen people. What it does not tell them is that
Speaker 2: those donations finance Israeli municipal budgets, Israeli social programs, Israeli
Speaker 2: military educational initiatives, Israeli media operations, Israeli diplomatic functions, and
Speaker 2: Israeli tourism infrastructure. These donors believe they're supporting a spiritual mission,
Speaker 2: but in reality they're actually underwriting the soft power of
Speaker 2: a foreign government. Friends of Zion is not simply an
Speaker 2: allied to Israel. It is a quiet extension of Israeli
Speaker 2: state craft. We're talking about politics and governments here says
Speaker 2: it is the same spirit that takes something earthly and
Speaker 2: elevates it to something divine. Friends of Zion has taken
Speaker 2: a modern state with all of its sins, with all
Speaker 2: of its scandals, with all of its injustices, and its
Speaker 2: political agendas, and has placed it on the altar. Guess
Speaker 2: who the altar boy was for the Israeli state Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2: Then it turns and demands that Christians sacrifice truth and
Speaker 2: integrity on that altar, even if it means slandering faithful brothers.
Speaker 2: That's the key issue, folks. That's why I can't stay
Speaker 2: silent about this. This has become a stench, it really has.
Speaker 2: And it's a stench based on not just what the
Speaker 2: Israeli government has done, but a stench as to the
Speaker 2: devotion and the worship that nominal Christians have done. And
Speaker 2: I say nominal because they take the name of Christ,
Speaker 2: but they don't follow him.
Speaker 3: JD.
Speaker 2: Hall finishes by saying, this is what spiritual corruption looks
Speaker 2: like when it matures. It takes the sacred things of
Speaker 2: God and it enlists them in the service of earthly powers.
Speaker 2: It uses scripture as a bludgeon to silence dissent. It
Speaker 2: trades the humility of the Gospel for the arrogance a
Speaker 2: political privilege, and it never repents because it believes that
Speaker 2: it's loyalty to the state is a form of righteousness,
Speaker 2: and that's what we're seeing here. And so we got
Speaker 2: a couple of comments here before the program ends.
Speaker 5: In the last minutes, Danny Boy fifty three says Substack,
Speaker 5: by the way, loving the commercial free podcast, David, love
Speaker 5: the tunes you've done. I'm a musician myself, guitarist and
Speaker 5: multi instrumentalists.
Speaker 2: Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 5: And of course if you are a subscriber on substack,
Speaker 5: you get the podcast ad free. It's a good way
Speaker 5: to support us, and you, like I said, get the
Speaker 5: podcast add free.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I was just going down memory yesterday I came
Speaker 2: across the thing on YouTube which was Chicago the band Chicago,
Speaker 2: and it was a concert Tanglewood nineteen seventy. I really
Speaker 2: thoroughly enjoyed it. I mean it almost felt like I
Speaker 2: was back in the band again because we did so
Speaker 2: many Chicago covers back in the day and it's great
Speaker 2: to hear them playing live. And of course the comments
Speaker 2: there were like, look at this, people are playing music
Speaker 2: live again. You know. It really was a great thing.
Speaker 2: And there was a comment there about Terry cath and I,
Speaker 2: you know, didn't follow Chicago enough to know the names
Speaker 2: of all the different people. I knew Pancal's name because
Speaker 2: he was a I believe it's been a long time.
Speaker 2: I think pankw was the trombonist. I thought he was
Speaker 2: really a fine musician. But they were talking about the guitarist,
Speaker 2: and it turns out that he died when he was
Speaker 2: only thirty one. He was the founder of Chicago. He
Speaker 2: died at the age of thirty one, and he almost disbanded,
Speaker 2: you know, kept him together. Doc Severnson talked to them
Speaker 2: and said, you need to stay together. But he was
Speaker 2: a really fine guitarist and the lead vocalist and the
Speaker 2: founder of the group. He shot himself by accident. He
Speaker 2: was playing around with He liked guys. He's playing around
Speaker 2: with them, and he had the classic mistake of not
Speaker 2: realizing that he had a semi automatic that still had
Speaker 2: a bullet chambered in the round playing aroundies. That's what
Speaker 2: do you think I wanna do? Blow my brains out?
Speaker 2: Famous last words. So sad to see it, but that's
Speaker 2: unfortunate anyway. On that note, I'm afraid that bit of
Speaker 2: disappointment that's right, we will say thank you for tuning
Speaker 2: in and we hope you have a nice day. Thank
Speaker 2: you God, bless y'all. The common man. They created common Core.
Speaker 2: They've dombe down our children. They created common Past to
Speaker 2: track and control us. They're Commons project to make sure
Speaker 2: the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 3: They see.
Speaker 2: The common man is simple, not sophisticated, ordinary, But each
Speaker 2: of us has worth and dignity created in the image
Speaker 2: of God. That is what we have in common. That
Speaker 2: is what they want to take away. Their most powerful
Speaker 2: weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know everything
Speaker 2: about us, while they hide everything from us.
Speaker 3: It's time to turn that around.
Speaker 2: And expose what they want to hide. Please share the
Speaker 2: information and links you'll find at Thedavidnightshow dot com. Thank
Speaker 2: you for listening, Thank you for sharing. If you can't
Speaker 2: support us financially, please keep us in your prayers. Ddavidknightshow
Speaker 2: dot com