WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.880 --> 00:00:04.639
<v Speaker 1>And aside slavery, child sacrifice, women, a second class citizens,

2
00:00:04.639 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a global flood that never happened, power of Bible that

3
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:10.759
<v Speaker 1>never happened, in exodus that never happened. And that's just

4
00:00:10.759 --> 00:00:13.199
<v Speaker 1>the first few books. If the Bible is a divine

5
00:00:13.240 --> 00:00:15.279
<v Speaker 1>word of an all knowing God, it's the worst edited

6
00:00:15.320 --> 00:00:18.039
<v Speaker 1>book in history. You believe the Bible is a good book,

7
00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:21.280
<v Speaker 1>all in make the cads for it because the show

8
00:00:21.760 --> 00:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it starts now. Hello, everybody. Today is August second of

9
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:37.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six. It is not August second, it is

10
00:00:37.359 --> 00:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>August ninth of twenty twenty six. I'm sorry. We want

11
00:00:41.520 --> 00:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to welcome you all to the atheist experience. Thanks for

12
00:00:44.399 --> 00:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>joining us today. I'm Jim Burrows, and joining me right

13
00:00:47.920 --> 00:00:52.679
<v Speaker 1>now is Jamie the Blind lamey. Oh, I'm sorry, Kelly,

14
00:00:52.719 --> 00:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the wrong person.

15
00:00:54.320 --> 00:00:59.359
<v Speaker 2>That's so great, Jamie, he's just their bank up push. Yes,

16
00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Jamie is here. You're not hallucinating.

17
00:01:03.280 --> 00:01:10.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm a professional. I know what I'm doing. So it

18
00:01:10.280 --> 00:01:11.840
<v Speaker 3>has been a little while. What have you been up to?

19
00:01:12.519 --> 00:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I you know, not much. I mean we just got

20
00:01:14.640 --> 00:01:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to see each other about a week ago. So and Jim,

21
00:01:17.239 --> 00:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I dude, I always look forward to hanging out with you.

22
00:01:20.120 --> 00:01:22.799
<v Speaker 2>So I was, and I was supposed to just be

23
00:01:22.920 --> 00:01:23.719
<v Speaker 2>the backup post.

24
00:01:23.760 --> 00:01:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Today.

25
00:01:24.040 --> 00:01:25.560
<v Speaker 2>When I found out that you did sell me to

26
00:01:25.599 --> 00:01:27.799
<v Speaker 2>step up, I was like, yes, I get to work

27
00:01:27.840 --> 00:01:28.519
<v Speaker 2>with Jim again.

28
00:01:28.680 --> 00:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Awesome.

29
00:01:30.200 --> 00:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well hopefully I get to stay the entire show.

30
00:01:33.280 --> 00:01:35.359
<v Speaker 1>We do have storms in about an hour ago, my

31
00:01:35.599 --> 00:01:37.239
<v Speaker 1>power went out for about two seconds.

32
00:01:37.359 --> 00:01:41.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh that sucks. Well we got Jamie just in case. Yeah,

33
00:01:41.159 --> 00:01:43.920
<v Speaker 3>so we'll see how it goes.

34
00:01:44.439 --> 00:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Being out in you know, southern Alabama, out and the

35
00:01:47.719 --> 00:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Sticks has its benefits, but it also has its drawbacks.

36
00:01:52.120 --> 00:01:54.359
<v Speaker 3>I live in the Sticks too, so I totally get it.

37
00:01:54.519 --> 00:01:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I totally yeah. And Alabama just there infrastructure sucks. So

38
00:01:59.280 --> 00:02:02.359
<v Speaker 1>it is what it is us. Well, we are the

39
00:02:02.439 --> 00:02:05.079
<v Speaker 1>Atheist Experience. It is a product of the Atheist Community

40
00:02:05.079 --> 00:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of Boston, a five h one c three nonprofit organization

41
00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:12.199
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to the promotion of atheism, critical thinking, secular humanism,

42
00:02:12.199 --> 00:02:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and the.

43
00:02:12.439 --> 00:02:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Segregation of religion and government.

44
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:16.879
<v Speaker 1>This means that you can give us a tax free

45
00:02:16.879 --> 00:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>donation as many as you want, the more of the marrier,

46
00:02:20.439 --> 00:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and no not only is going to a good cause,

47
00:02:22.319 --> 00:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but also that it helps you too. We are tri

48
00:02:25.520 --> 00:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>streaming tonight, So a big shout out to our viewers

49
00:02:27.719 --> 00:02:31.039
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok and YouTube mobile. If you're watching on TikTok

50
00:02:31.080 --> 00:02:33.319
<v Speaker 1>tonight and you'd like to talk to us, request to

51
00:02:33.400 --> 00:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>join and we'll bring you up on stage. Please make

52
00:02:35.960 --> 00:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that you are over eighteen years of age before

53
00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>doing so, especially if you're coming from TikTok.

54
00:02:45.039 --> 00:02:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Take some calls, Kelly, Yeah, eh, if we got calls,

55
00:02:48.840 --> 00:02:53.080
<v Speaker 3>let's just jump right in. Alrighty, So our.

56
00:02:53.000 --> 00:03:03.319
<v Speaker 1>First caller is Donald from either Louisiana or LA. So

57
00:03:03.560 --> 00:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about the unactualized actualizer and you're

58
00:03:07.520 --> 00:03:09.159
<v Speaker 1>an atheist?

59
00:03:08.840 --> 00:03:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Correct?

60
00:03:09.199 --> 00:03:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Yes, yes, I was invited here. I was previously on

61
00:03:15.919 --> 00:03:23.840
<v Speaker 5>from the What is It talk? Even Yeah yeah, okay.

62
00:03:23.919 --> 00:03:31.759
<v Speaker 5>So basically the argument would be, there is actuality, something exists.

63
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:34.879
<v Speaker 5>You can doubt almost anything. You can doubt your senses,

64
00:03:34.960 --> 00:03:39.080
<v Speaker 5>you can doubt whether the world looks anything like how

65
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:42.960
<v Speaker 5>you perceive it. You can even entertain the possibility that

66
00:03:43.039 --> 00:03:48.840
<v Speaker 5>you're dreaming or living in the simulation. But the information

67
00:03:49.000 --> 00:03:58.199
<v Speaker 5>that distance exists cannot itself be eliminated by skepticism, like

68
00:03:58.759 --> 00:04:03.319
<v Speaker 5>the stamente existence exists to exist, at least as on

69
00:04:03.319 --> 00:04:05.639
<v Speaker 5>an informational level, and you could go so far as

70
00:04:05.680 --> 00:04:10.240
<v Speaker 5>saying it's a thought or or proposition in order to

71
00:04:10.319 --> 00:04:16.480
<v Speaker 5>even be considered. So as we begin with actuality, something

72
00:04:16.720 --> 00:04:21.399
<v Speaker 5>is and one something is, we immediately have distinction between

73
00:04:21.600 --> 00:04:25.680
<v Speaker 5>existence and non existence, and things being true and things

74
00:04:25.720 --> 00:04:31.079
<v Speaker 5>being false, between a and not a, And distinction is

75
00:04:31.120 --> 00:04:36.160
<v Speaker 5>important because without distinction we cannot have information. If for this,

76
00:04:36.240 --> 00:04:40.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to define information at a fundamental level as

77
00:04:40.759 --> 00:04:46.360
<v Speaker 5>structured distinction between possible states. If there is no difference whatsoever,

78
00:04:46.639 --> 00:04:51.000
<v Speaker 5>there is nothing to distinguish, nothing to compare, and nothing

79
00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:56.560
<v Speaker 5>to measure, and nothing to inform or give information. Now

80
00:04:57.000 --> 00:05:01.240
<v Speaker 5>consider change. Suppose something is cool old and becomes hot

81
00:05:02.040 --> 00:05:09.639
<v Speaker 5>or or late, and so heat moves moves into the object.

82
00:05:10.240 --> 00:05:16.079
<v Speaker 5>Before the change, being hot was possible. Afterward hot is actual,

83
00:05:16.519 --> 00:05:20.079
<v Speaker 5>So we moved from potentially hot to actually hot.

84
00:05:21.360 --> 00:05:25.639
<v Speaker 1>So let me just center up here, as you started

85
00:05:25.639 --> 00:05:30.079
<v Speaker 1>with a really really good topic, and energy, an energy

86
00:05:30.120 --> 00:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be created or described?

87
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:34.279
<v Speaker 5>Can energy be ordered or described?

88
00:05:34.959 --> 00:05:37.160
<v Speaker 3>And to be created or described?

89
00:05:40.199 --> 00:05:44.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, the law of thermo dynamic says energy can either

90
00:05:44.720 --> 00:05:46.480
<v Speaker 5>be created nor destroyed.

91
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:49.959
<v Speaker 1>So so I don't need anything more than energy to

92
00:05:51.199 --> 00:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean energy is that on actualized, actualized. Right, it's

93
00:05:55.279 --> 00:05:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the thing that, as far as we can tell, is

94
00:05:58.519 --> 00:06:00.639
<v Speaker 1>responsible for the beginning the universe.

95
00:06:01.160 --> 00:06:06.759
<v Speaker 5>Right, Well, okay, well I would argue before well I

96
00:06:06.800 --> 00:06:09.279
<v Speaker 5>was going to get to this, but I would argue

97
00:06:09.560 --> 00:06:13.759
<v Speaker 5>space and time is more fundamental than energy, and I

98
00:06:13.800 --> 00:06:15.360
<v Speaker 5>would matter, and then I.

99
00:06:16.199 --> 00:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I can is it? I can destroy matter. I mean

100
00:06:20.519 --> 00:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that within a nuclear explosion. So it doesn't that doesn't

101
00:06:23.759 --> 00:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>get men. And you can't get any more basic than

102
00:06:25.959 --> 00:06:30.759
<v Speaker 1>energy because energy equals MC squared. Yeah, energy is all

103
00:06:30.759 --> 00:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I need.

104
00:06:32.120 --> 00:06:36.199
<v Speaker 5>No, I think information is more fundamental than energy. Prove it.

105
00:06:36.639 --> 00:06:43.160
<v Speaker 3>What what do you make with information without energy? Okay?

106
00:06:43.279 --> 00:06:49.879
<v Speaker 5>Well, some rules like the fact that existence exists, or

107
00:06:50.319 --> 00:06:55.720
<v Speaker 5>the logical rules like non contradiction, I would say, make

108
00:06:56.199 --> 00:06:59.319
<v Speaker 5>energy possible, like energy and changing.

109
00:06:59.399 --> 00:07:01.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah much, sure, I'm not sure about that.

110
00:07:01.439 --> 00:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>And please the Yeah, the laws, the laws of logic

111
00:07:06.800 --> 00:07:10.759
<v Speaker 1>require a mind to understand. Right, they are a way

112
00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that we describe the universe. So it's math.

113
00:07:13.680 --> 00:07:16.399
<v Speaker 3>So how how is that fundamental?

114
00:07:17.000 --> 00:07:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay? Some of the rules of logic are you could say,

115
00:07:21.839 --> 00:07:28.600
<v Speaker 5>or more concepts and there are approximations. But I I

116
00:07:28.639 --> 00:07:37.079
<v Speaker 5>would say, some logical rules you are are are prior

117
00:07:37.199 --> 00:07:43.519
<v Speaker 5>like the for energy to happen, for actions and energy

118
00:07:43.839 --> 00:07:47.399
<v Speaker 5>to happen. You're saying, oh, there's a there's a higher

119
00:07:47.519 --> 00:07:50.639
<v Speaker 5>energy state and then there's like a lower energy state. Well,

120
00:07:50.680 --> 00:07:56.560
<v Speaker 5>that requires a distinction in space and time, Like.

121
00:07:56.560 --> 00:07:58.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you said that.

122
00:07:58.879 --> 00:08:01.199
<v Speaker 1>No, you don't need to say in space of time, right,

123
00:08:01.560 --> 00:08:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and whether you need a distinction in space time or

124
00:08:04.399 --> 00:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>space and time depending on which the area of time

125
00:08:07.160 --> 00:08:10.759
<v Speaker 1>you go with. Right, we don't even know that which

126
00:08:10.759 --> 00:08:12.279
<v Speaker 1>are those two things are real?

127
00:08:12.759 --> 00:08:13.480
<v Speaker 3>So to say that.

128
00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>There is a distinction or something like that, yeah, okay,

129
00:08:16.000 --> 00:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So what I don't see how you get to needing

130
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:20.959
<v Speaker 1>anything more than energy.

131
00:08:21.519 --> 00:08:25.959
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's the information of the distinction between being in

132
00:08:26.000 --> 00:08:29.040
<v Speaker 5>this position and this time and being in this position

133
00:08:29.319 --> 00:08:31.639
<v Speaker 5>and time and going from one state to another. There's

134
00:08:31.680 --> 00:08:35.679
<v Speaker 5>information there, Okay, in those two states. That's information.

135
00:08:36.440 --> 00:08:39.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And what and what what is? What is your

136
00:08:39.600 --> 00:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>point that there's information there?

137
00:08:41.159 --> 00:08:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little.

138
00:08:41.679 --> 00:08:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Confused for for energy to exist in different states to exist,

139
00:08:48.360 --> 00:08:51.960
<v Speaker 5>there's thermodynamically, there's information.

140
00:08:53.000 --> 00:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>No, we don't need information is something that like we

141
00:08:56.159 --> 00:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>consciously have in our brain. Right, something can change its

142
00:08:59.720 --> 00:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>state from one physical state to another using energy and

143
00:09:03.759 --> 00:09:06.360
<v Speaker 2>we never have to know that. So what I don't

144
00:09:06.440 --> 00:09:08.679
<v Speaker 2>understand the information connection here.

145
00:09:09.159 --> 00:09:13.320
<v Speaker 5>Okay, there's information that's just conceptual information in the mind,

146
00:09:13.720 --> 00:09:20.240
<v Speaker 5>but there's also information like information properties like something's average

147
00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:22.679
<v Speaker 5>kinetic energy.

148
00:09:21.919 --> 00:09:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Or Yes, but you have to have them. Yeah, that's information.

149
00:09:25.679 --> 00:09:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are just those are those are descriptions of things,

150
00:09:29.480 --> 00:09:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and you have to.

151
00:09:30.120 --> 00:09:32.519
<v Speaker 3>Have a mind. You have to have a mind for that.

152
00:09:32.519 --> 00:09:35.879
<v Speaker 1>To in order to exactly you have a mind to

153
00:09:35.879 --> 00:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>describe something.

154
00:09:37.480 --> 00:09:39.480
<v Speaker 2>So if you don't have a mind to observe it,

155
00:09:39.559 --> 00:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>then then the information doesn't matter that you don't need

156
00:09:42.759 --> 00:09:45.279
<v Speaker 2>the information for that transformation to happen.

157
00:09:45.879 --> 00:09:48.200
<v Speaker 5>No, No, you would need a mind to perceive it

158
00:09:48.279 --> 00:09:52.360
<v Speaker 5>and then describe it. But the information of that still exists.

159
00:09:52.000 --> 00:09:58.039
<v Speaker 1>Like something happening exist without a mind, right, things exist

160
00:09:58.039 --> 00:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>without a mind. But information is how we disc I

161
00:10:00.159 --> 00:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>have those things because the difference you're you're confusing the

162
00:10:03.919 --> 00:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>map for the territory.

163
00:10:06.639 --> 00:10:12.879
<v Speaker 5>No, the information like quantum information isn't that's not just perception.

164
00:10:13.120 --> 00:10:17.799
<v Speaker 5>Those those are states that can be entangled and give

165
00:10:17.879 --> 00:10:19.000
<v Speaker 5>distinction between.

166
00:10:18.799 --> 00:10:19.879
<v Speaker 3>All those things exist.

167
00:10:20.039 --> 00:10:23.519
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but in order for it to be information, right,

168
00:10:23.639 --> 00:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be perceived by mind. Otherwise it's just

169
00:10:26.919 --> 00:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the state of things and there's no description of it. Right,

170
00:10:30.039 --> 00:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it is right, just like the territory is. It doesn't

171
00:10:33.200 --> 00:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>matter what the MOPS has.

172
00:10:34.879 --> 00:10:39.960
<v Speaker 5>No, there's the math implies an ontological distinction between states,

173
00:10:40.240 --> 00:10:42.120
<v Speaker 5>whether or not it doesn't.

174
00:10:42.399 --> 00:10:46.120
<v Speaker 2>No, you're you're I think you're donald, You're you're you're

175
00:10:46.200 --> 00:10:52.000
<v Speaker 2>confusing the fact that when something happens that that creates information, right,

176
00:10:52.480 --> 00:10:56.039
<v Speaker 2>But it's not creating information if there's nobody there to

177
00:10:56.240 --> 00:10:57.200
<v Speaker 2>perceive the.

178
00:10:57.080 --> 00:10:58.559
<v Speaker 3>Information, right.

179
00:10:58.639 --> 00:11:00.519
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you're I don't know how you're

180
00:11:00.519 --> 00:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>defining information if you if that's not something you agree to,

181
00:11:04.519 --> 00:11:07.440
<v Speaker 2>and if that's and if you are defining information differently,

182
00:11:07.480 --> 00:11:09.519
<v Speaker 2>I think I would love it if you would clarify

183
00:11:09.600 --> 00:11:10.159
<v Speaker 2>what you mean.

184
00:11:10.759 --> 00:11:17.440
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I'll repeat the definition I stated before. Information is

185
00:11:18.039 --> 00:11:22.159
<v Speaker 5>a structured distinction between possible states.

186
00:11:22.600 --> 00:11:25.519
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And how do we know that that's information without

187
00:11:25.600 --> 00:11:26.279
<v Speaker 2>presenting that?

188
00:11:26.600 --> 00:11:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, that also sounds like a description to me.

189
00:11:29.000 --> 00:11:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, that's that doesn't sound Yeah like I'm understood

190
00:11:33.039 --> 00:11:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that these states, right that you're describing, how are they

191
00:11:36.279 --> 00:11:41.279
<v Speaker 2>information without something to perceive the information? I mean, like

192
00:11:41.360 --> 00:11:45.320
<v Speaker 2>information is just our ore is us having the ability

193
00:11:45.360 --> 00:11:48.559
<v Speaker 2>to perceive the thing and and process it within our brain.

194
00:11:49.159 --> 00:11:52.159
<v Speaker 2>So when you say that that's information, you're you're describing

195
00:11:52.200 --> 00:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>a state of things, but there's no information because there's

196
00:11:56.159 --> 00:11:59.039
<v Speaker 2>nothing nobody there to perceive that information.

197
00:11:59.200 --> 00:12:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you understand you know what I'm saying.

198
00:12:00.879 --> 00:12:06.440
<v Speaker 5>No? Not, This is okay. There is a difference between

199
00:12:06.600 --> 00:12:10.600
<v Speaker 5>conceptual information and quantum information.

200
00:12:10.639 --> 00:12:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I understand that, Donald, I understand that. But it's still

201
00:12:15.240 --> 00:12:19.200
<v Speaker 2>you still need a mind to perceive the information, whether

202
00:12:19.279 --> 00:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>it's conceptual or not. If it's conceptual, then you need

203
00:12:22.519 --> 00:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>a mind to conceive it, right, Yes, if the conceptual okay.

204
00:12:26.799 --> 00:12:27.879
<v Speaker 3>So there you go.

205
00:12:28.000 --> 00:12:30.240
<v Speaker 2>So if you have no mind to conceive it, there

206
00:12:30.320 --> 00:12:32.080
<v Speaker 2>is no information at all.

207
00:12:32.320 --> 00:12:35.559
<v Speaker 5>No, No, there's information in this without a perceiver.

208
00:12:36.399 --> 00:12:36.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

209
00:12:36.759 --> 00:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>So the problem is that you're redefining information in a

210
00:12:39.720 --> 00:12:43.399
<v Speaker 1>way that isn't actually useful, right, because you are still

211
00:12:43.399 --> 00:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>attempting to say that there is a state of things,

212
00:12:45.399 --> 00:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and things and states change. I'm agreeing with that or

213
00:12:49.879 --> 00:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>or we're disagreeing is with your is You're trying to

214
00:12:52.960 --> 00:12:56.759
<v Speaker 1>say that information is that change, and that is not

215
00:12:56.840 --> 00:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the case, right, Because you're redefining information in a way

216
00:12:59.639 --> 00:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that is not useful because.

217
00:13:01.840 --> 00:13:05.840
<v Speaker 5>It's not if you want to taking this from physics.

218
00:13:05.720 --> 00:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh, information theory is a mathematical branch or probability and

219
00:13:09.080 --> 00:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>statistics and studies the quantification, storage, and communication of information.

220
00:13:14.360 --> 00:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if there is an information information definition physics,

221
00:13:20.840 --> 00:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a measurable physical property of a system. Yes, that's

222
00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you're saying, and we're saying yes. But just

223
00:13:27.360 --> 00:13:30.159
<v Speaker 1>because just because there's a system and it can be measured,

224
00:13:30.720 --> 00:13:33.159
<v Speaker 1>there's no measurement. You can't measure it without a mind.

225
00:13:33.159 --> 00:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>A mind has to measure it. Otherwise the system just is.

226
00:13:36.279 --> 00:13:40.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's something without somebody to measure and perceive it.

227
00:13:40.639 --> 00:13:41.240
<v Speaker 5>It just is.

228
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:42.240
<v Speaker 3>It's not information.

229
00:13:42.679 --> 00:13:45.159
<v Speaker 2>It's like the way you're describing it, Donald, it sounds

230
00:13:45.200 --> 00:13:47.480
<v Speaker 2>like you're saying that we need to have the information

231
00:13:47.639 --> 00:13:48.799
<v Speaker 2>to make the change happen.

232
00:13:49.399 --> 00:13:50.639
<v Speaker 5>Yes, and that's what I'm saying.

233
00:13:50.639 --> 00:13:52.519
<v Speaker 2>There's a different and that's what and that's what Jim

234
00:13:52.559 --> 00:13:55.120
<v Speaker 2>and I are are fundamental that's what Jim and I

235
00:13:55.159 --> 00:13:56.879
<v Speaker 2>are fundamentally disagreeing with.

236
00:13:56.919 --> 00:13:58.200
<v Speaker 3>We don't think you're correct on.

237
00:13:58.200 --> 00:14:00.480
<v Speaker 5>That, Okay, I'm we don't.

238
00:14:00.360 --> 00:14:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Think the information necessary for energy to exist.

239
00:14:03.360 --> 00:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, no mind is necessary for energy to change state exactly.

240
00:14:07.159 --> 00:14:12.200
<v Speaker 5>No, there is there is a distinction between states that.

241
00:14:12.960 --> 00:14:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Isn't just how was that distinction made?

242
00:14:16.720 --> 00:14:20.120
<v Speaker 5>Donald, Well, I was going to try to get into

243
00:14:20.159 --> 00:14:22.879
<v Speaker 5>that between the unactual lives actualizer and.

244
00:14:22.799 --> 00:14:25.559
<v Speaker 2>Then well, well just just just it's an easy just

245
00:14:25.679 --> 00:14:28.120
<v Speaker 2>how do you make that distinction that you're talking about?

246
00:14:28.559 --> 00:14:30.960
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Well, we use our perception to find it.

247
00:14:31.240 --> 00:14:34.159
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Okay, that's what we've been saying. Now you're now

248
00:14:34.240 --> 00:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly what Jim and I have been saying that

249
00:14:37.120 --> 00:14:40.879
<v Speaker 2>that But that didn't That didn't happen until you perceived it.

250
00:14:41.320 --> 00:14:43.399
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think your understanding is it's like it's

251
00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:44.559
<v Speaker 2>going right over your head.

252
00:14:44.600 --> 00:14:44.759
<v Speaker 6>Man.

253
00:14:44.799 --> 00:14:48.919
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, I understand, I know, I understand what you're saying.

254
00:14:49.000 --> 00:14:50.879
<v Speaker 5>This is going over your.

255
00:14:50.840 --> 00:14:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Head of No, I understand, I completely understand what you're saying.

256
00:14:54.320 --> 00:14:56.120
<v Speaker 3>I just disagree with it.

257
00:14:56.159 --> 00:14:59.799
<v Speaker 5>Is the distinction still exists on some fundamental level.

258
00:15:00.519 --> 00:15:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but the distinction isn't information. The distinction is just

259
00:15:04.559 --> 00:15:08.399
<v Speaker 2>two states of being and they don't become information until

260
00:15:08.519 --> 00:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>somebody perceives them as information.

261
00:15:11.600 --> 00:15:13.559
<v Speaker 5>No, that makes them a thought, That doesn't make the

262
00:15:13.919 --> 00:15:16.039
<v Speaker 5>that that makes some conceptual information.

263
00:15:16.080 --> 00:15:19.000
<v Speaker 3>What do you think information is? Is an information?

264
00:15:19.120 --> 00:15:25.200
<v Speaker 5>Thoughts, that's conceptual information. That's not the information of charge

265
00:15:25.440 --> 00:15:29.639
<v Speaker 5>and kinetic energy and.

266
00:15:28.399 --> 00:15:33.039
<v Speaker 2>And those things aren't information. Those are charges in kinetic energy.

267
00:15:33.159 --> 00:15:38.000
<v Speaker 2>That's not information. You just describe them as what they

268
00:15:38.080 --> 00:15:40.360
<v Speaker 2>were not, you know. And then you were saying, well,

269
00:15:40.360 --> 00:15:43.799
<v Speaker 2>this is esthetic energy is I don't understand what you're where?

270
00:15:43.840 --> 00:15:46.080
<v Speaker 2>You're where you think kinetic energy is information?

271
00:15:47.639 --> 00:15:51.960
<v Speaker 5>Explain that become then how can they then become entangled

272
00:15:52.399 --> 00:15:53.759
<v Speaker 5>and pass and passed?

273
00:15:55.440 --> 00:15:55.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

274
00:15:55.799 --> 00:15:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they don't need they don't need to know what's

275
00:15:58.919 --> 00:15:59.879
<v Speaker 2>happening to have that.

276
00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:01.039
<v Speaker 6>I didn't finish.

277
00:16:01.279 --> 00:16:05.000
<v Speaker 5>I didn't finish. All right, Okay, If they're able to

278
00:16:05.039 --> 00:16:08.879
<v Speaker 5>be entangled, and they're able to be transferred from one

279
00:16:08.919 --> 00:16:15.440
<v Speaker 5>particle to another without with uh, and they're able to

280
00:16:15.480 --> 00:16:19.279
<v Speaker 5>reach from a one position to another faster than the

281
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:23.159
<v Speaker 5>speed of light, then they are materially transfer Then they

282
00:16:23.200 --> 00:16:26.360
<v Speaker 5>are transferring to something that isn't that isn't material.

283
00:16:27.080 --> 00:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, energy is a material or do you mean it does?

284
00:16:29.879 --> 00:16:30.639
<v Speaker 1>It's not energy.

285
00:16:31.480 --> 00:16:34.360
<v Speaker 5>It's not just the energy, it's you're you're.

286
00:16:34.200 --> 00:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>You're you're just taking that immatory material thing that you're

287
00:16:37.159 --> 00:16:40.200
<v Speaker 2>talking about and you're plugging the word information into it

288
00:16:40.279 --> 00:16:44.320
<v Speaker 2>without having a direct correlation, is what I'm seeing. Okay, Well,

289
00:16:44.399 --> 00:16:47.679
<v Speaker 2>it's like you're using information, the word information to describe

290
00:16:47.720 --> 00:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>that when it doesn't really fit what you're describing.

291
00:16:50.679 --> 00:16:52.879
<v Speaker 3>Well, and that's why I think Jim and I are confused.

292
00:16:53.480 --> 00:16:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Fine, I can use a different word. Uh. But but

293
00:16:58.279 --> 00:17:02.320
<v Speaker 5>physicists use the word quantum information to describe this, So

294
00:17:02.720 --> 00:17:04.000
<v Speaker 5>it's not me doing it.

295
00:17:04.599 --> 00:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a physicist. I'm not a quantum physicist. So

296
00:17:07.200 --> 00:17:08.519
<v Speaker 2>you got to dumb it down for me.

297
00:17:09.160 --> 00:17:11.119
<v Speaker 5>Okay, well, then what do you want to call it?

298
00:17:12.039 --> 00:17:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I would rather have something that's more indicative of what

299
00:17:15.279 --> 00:17:18.599
<v Speaker 2>it's actually what it actually is. And to me, to

300
00:17:18.680 --> 00:17:21.519
<v Speaker 2>me that we've been talking about states of being, that

301
00:17:21.640 --> 00:17:24.880
<v Speaker 2>seems to be what we're doing. We're not talking about information.

302
00:17:25.000 --> 00:17:27.799
<v Speaker 2>We're just talking about states of being and those states changing.

303
00:17:28.359 --> 00:17:30.599
<v Speaker 2>I thought we had already kind of defined it already

304
00:17:30.680 --> 00:17:32.319
<v Speaker 2>without using the lot information.

305
00:17:32.880 --> 00:17:37.559
<v Speaker 5>But it's not energy. It's more fundamental than energy and masses.

306
00:17:37.799 --> 00:17:40.319
<v Speaker 3>How does a state change from one thing to another

307
00:17:40.400 --> 00:17:41.400
<v Speaker 3>thing without energy?

308
00:17:42.160 --> 00:17:49.839
<v Speaker 5>Okay, thermodynamic states require energy, but and okay, if you

309
00:17:49.960 --> 00:17:55.759
<v Speaker 5>have okay, but if you have entropy and you have

310
00:17:56.000 --> 00:17:57.720
<v Speaker 5>let's say a black.

311
00:17:57.400 --> 00:18:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Hole takes into measures of energy, a measure of the

312
00:18:01.880 --> 00:18:03.039
<v Speaker 1>energy of the state of energy.

313
00:18:04.079 --> 00:18:05.039
<v Speaker 5>Okay, it's been you.

314
00:18:05.759 --> 00:18:06.119
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

315
00:18:06.920 --> 00:18:13.200
<v Speaker 5>The early definitions of entropy were a description of usable energy,

316
00:18:13.559 --> 00:18:19.000
<v Speaker 5>but later but later descriptions like Shannon entropy and Noyman

317
00:18:19.240 --> 00:18:26.039
<v Speaker 5>entropy talk about the the information density impossible states.

318
00:18:26.480 --> 00:18:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so it's still energy.

319
00:18:28.279 --> 00:18:31.599
<v Speaker 5>It's not. And there's a difference between the information of

320
00:18:31.759 --> 00:18:33.319
<v Speaker 5>possible states and energy.

321
00:18:33.359 --> 00:18:35.160
<v Speaker 3>It's what's the difference.

322
00:18:37.680 --> 00:18:43.079
<v Speaker 5>The difference is that there are all of these possible

323
00:18:43.160 --> 00:18:48.200
<v Speaker 5>there's all of these possibilities that are in that are

324
00:18:48.200 --> 00:18:53.400
<v Speaker 5>in like a wave function that that can that information

325
00:18:53.519 --> 00:18:57.559
<v Speaker 5>passes and shares between them. Energy is bound by the

326
00:18:57.599 --> 00:19:01.960
<v Speaker 5>speed of light. This information, uh, this what they call

327
00:19:02.039 --> 00:19:06.079
<v Speaker 5>quantum information. We haven't determined a different word for it

328
00:19:06.119 --> 00:19:11.279
<v Speaker 5>can be transferred through entanglement faster than the speed of light.

329
00:19:11.400 --> 00:19:12.359
<v Speaker 5>It's not bound.

330
00:19:13.680 --> 00:19:17.279
<v Speaker 1>So quantum mechanics isn't also energy. I mean, the quantum

331
00:19:17.559 --> 00:19:19.559
<v Speaker 1>aren't also energy.

332
00:19:20.000 --> 00:19:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, but I'm wondering what it's like. You're saying

333
00:19:22.640 --> 00:19:25.880
<v Speaker 2>that these quanta, that this quantum movement isn't energy.

334
00:19:26.480 --> 00:19:33.720
<v Speaker 5>Okay, the force carrier particles do carry energy to carry

335
00:19:34.319 --> 00:19:37.720
<v Speaker 5>the carry information that changes the field, and the change

336
00:19:37.720 --> 00:19:41.160
<v Speaker 5>in the field is the energy. But the energy is

337
00:19:41.240 --> 00:19:45.839
<v Speaker 5>emergent of these particle interactions and all of these possibilities

338
00:19:45.880 --> 00:19:49.039
<v Speaker 5>in the wave function. The information in that is more

339
00:19:49.079 --> 00:19:53.799
<v Speaker 5>fundamental than the then the energy transfer, the energy transfer

340
00:19:54.079 --> 00:19:56.680
<v Speaker 5>is emergent from these interactions.

341
00:19:56.680 --> 00:19:58.079
<v Speaker 3>We didn't say.

342
00:19:58.160 --> 00:20:01.599
<v Speaker 2>We didn't say that the energy transfer wasn't pertinent, you know,

343
00:20:02.240 --> 00:20:04.559
<v Speaker 2>but we're what we're saying is it has.

344
00:20:04.440 --> 00:20:06.000
<v Speaker 3>To be there. Okay.

345
00:20:06.559 --> 00:20:08.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's like you were describing this thing. You

346
00:20:08.839 --> 00:20:12.200
<v Speaker 2>were describing it as if there was no energy there. Well,

347
00:20:12.240 --> 00:20:14.799
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter if the energy is the pertinent thing there.

348
00:20:14.839 --> 00:20:18.480
<v Speaker 2>It's still there making the movement happen, right, making there

349
00:20:18.519 --> 00:20:20.319
<v Speaker 2>are that the state's changed.

350
00:20:20.759 --> 00:20:25.759
<v Speaker 5>There are some systems where information is only transferred, like

351
00:20:25.799 --> 00:20:29.000
<v Speaker 5>in a black hole. It absorbs all of this, all

352
00:20:29.039 --> 00:20:30.359
<v Speaker 5>of all of this matter.

353
00:20:30.359 --> 00:20:32.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we know the inside of the black hole,

354
00:20:32.480 --> 00:20:32.759
<v Speaker 3>do we.

355
00:20:33.359 --> 00:20:35.599
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, I'm trying to get on the event horizon.

356
00:20:35.680 --> 00:20:40.039
<v Speaker 5>On the event horizon, the information is preserved on the

357
00:20:40.079 --> 00:20:43.680
<v Speaker 5>event horizon and it's entangled with the things in the

358
00:20:43.720 --> 00:20:47.079
<v Speaker 5>black hole. But the information has been separated from the

359
00:20:47.119 --> 00:20:48.359
<v Speaker 5>matter and the energy.

360
00:20:48.880 --> 00:20:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me let me just ask this something more fundamental.

361
00:20:51.519 --> 00:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Is your unactualized actualizer natural or is it a mind?

362
00:20:55.680 --> 00:20:58.400
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, it's it's not a it's not a mind.

363
00:20:59.559 --> 00:20:59.880
<v Speaker 3>I get.

364
00:21:00.359 --> 00:21:04.000
<v Speaker 5>I get from the unactualized the actualizer to Plotinus, is

365
00:21:04.039 --> 00:21:07.920
<v Speaker 5>the one and the one is not a mind because

366
00:21:08.039 --> 00:21:12.079
<v Speaker 5>consciousness is a change, is a changing process, and it

367
00:21:12.119 --> 00:21:16.599
<v Speaker 5>can I don't believe consciousness can occur before time and

368
00:21:17.000 --> 00:21:21.039
<v Speaker 5>the one being an unchanging thing. H I don't think

369
00:21:21.039 --> 00:21:25.480
<v Speaker 5>it can have it can be conscious because consciousness is

370
00:21:25.519 --> 00:21:31.839
<v Speaker 5>itself changing and the one is chang. Okay, it is okay,

371
00:21:32.200 --> 00:21:38.359
<v Speaker 5>the one, Okay. The unactualized actualizer is pure actuality. All

372
00:21:38.480 --> 00:21:43.680
<v Speaker 5>the things with potent parts, potential and actual emerge from it.

373
00:21:44.039 --> 00:21:48.920
<v Speaker 5>So it's it's it could, it could. It's pure actuality.

374
00:21:49.319 --> 00:21:53.519
<v Speaker 5>That is like an ontological ground that makes that makes

375
00:21:53.519 --> 00:21:56.440
<v Speaker 5>it to where all of these things with potential can happen.

376
00:21:56.960 --> 00:22:01.079
<v Speaker 5>It's it's like it's like the unity between things. It

377
00:22:01.319 --> 00:22:05.319
<v Speaker 5>makes it makes it to where measurement and distinction can exist.

378
00:22:05.359 --> 00:22:08.759
<v Speaker 5>But it's not like made.

379
00:22:09.920 --> 00:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, measurement and extension are require a change. And you're

380
00:22:14.480 --> 00:22:16.759
<v Speaker 1>saying that all changes in this thing. Therefore it's one

381
00:22:16.839 --> 00:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that doesn't make any sense either, right.

382
00:22:19.920 --> 00:22:25.240
<v Speaker 5>Okay, okay, it's it's okay. If you have a plant

383
00:22:25.720 --> 00:22:30.599
<v Speaker 5>and it grows out of the ground, it grew from

384
00:22:30.640 --> 00:22:35.279
<v Speaker 5>the ground and absorb orbs light and water and nutrients

385
00:22:35.279 --> 00:22:38.720
<v Speaker 5>from the ground. But it isn't But the ground itself

386
00:22:38.799 --> 00:22:44.759
<v Speaker 5>is not alive, but life is able to emerge from it.

387
00:22:44.720 --> 00:22:46.279
<v Speaker 6>It's it's like the set.

388
00:22:46.279 --> 00:22:51.279
<v Speaker 5>That contains all sets. It's it contains everything within it,

389
00:22:51.599 --> 00:22:56.640
<v Speaker 5>and it's omnipresent, and it's beyond time and space. But

390
00:22:56.640 --> 00:23:00.359
<v Speaker 5>but it's like it's like logic or maths. It's more

391
00:23:00.359 --> 00:23:03.039
<v Speaker 5>fundamental than logical masks. But it's think of it like that.

392
00:23:03.160 --> 00:23:04.200
<v Speaker 6>It's like it.

393
00:23:05.519 --> 00:23:09.240
<v Speaker 5>It has the rules from which everything can emerge from it,

394
00:23:09.279 --> 00:23:13.319
<v Speaker 5>just like a life emerging from the ground. It makes

395
00:23:13.480 --> 00:23:16.039
<v Speaker 5>life possible, but it itself is not alive. It has

396
00:23:16.119 --> 00:23:18.400
<v Speaker 5>living things growing from it and within it.

397
00:23:19.000 --> 00:23:20.440
<v Speaker 3>And how did you figure all this out?

398
00:23:20.920 --> 00:23:23.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, well, it's not me. I'm taking arguments from like

399
00:23:23.960 --> 00:23:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Plato and Blondness and Aristotle.

400
00:23:26.799 --> 00:23:30.319
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, I think you're from Plato that involves physics

401
00:23:30.400 --> 00:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and quantum mechanics.

402
00:23:32.920 --> 00:23:35.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm extending those ideas, and.

403
00:23:36.920 --> 00:23:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's what I'm asking. That's what I'm asking. That's

404
00:23:39.440 --> 00:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>what I'm asking. Donald got You took this idea and

405
00:23:42.039 --> 00:23:43.960
<v Speaker 2>this idea and this idea and this idea, and you

406
00:23:44.039 --> 00:23:47.000
<v Speaker 2>mashed them all together. Right, But what makes you think

407
00:23:47.039 --> 00:23:49.079
<v Speaker 2>that when you matched all these things together that this

408
00:23:49.319 --> 00:23:50.240
<v Speaker 2>was correct?

409
00:23:50.440 --> 00:23:54.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, I examined the premises from many philosophers.

410
00:23:54.960 --> 00:23:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I've done the same thing. I'm asking you what

411
00:23:57.039 --> 00:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>made you think that you particularly were correct?

412
00:24:00.160 --> 00:24:01.519
<v Speaker 3>What is it that you know?

413
00:24:01.960 --> 00:24:04.359
<v Speaker 2>I understand the process you talk, but what is it

414
00:24:04.519 --> 00:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>in that process that made you figure it out?

415
00:24:08.079 --> 00:24:10.440
<v Speaker 3>What was the straw that broke the camel's back for you?

416
00:24:11.119 --> 00:24:16.559
<v Speaker 5>I used logic to try to figure out what premises

417
00:24:16.640 --> 00:24:21.079
<v Speaker 5>work and what premises don't work and don't contradict each other,

418
00:24:21.160 --> 00:24:25.640
<v Speaker 5>and what fits all the knowledge and inform and evidence

419
00:24:25.680 --> 00:24:30.119
<v Speaker 5>and information I know, with having the least assumptions possible,

420
00:24:30.720 --> 00:24:34.759
<v Speaker 5>and decided that this is the most probabilistically true thing.

421
00:24:35.000 --> 00:24:37.599
<v Speaker 3>So you just thought it up on your own, basically,

422
00:24:38.119 --> 00:24:42.720
<v Speaker 3>well by a physicistist.

423
00:24:43.359 --> 00:24:47.039
<v Speaker 5>I have a bachelor's in physics and I'm working toward

424
00:24:47.279 --> 00:24:50.359
<v Speaker 5>or the PhD. But I mean, I've talked to other

425
00:24:50.759 --> 00:24:55.279
<v Speaker 5>physicists about this, but they they usually come to the

426
00:24:55.319 --> 00:25:01.039
<v Speaker 5>point where I'm talking. I'm talking about metaphysics and ontological things.

427
00:25:01.640 --> 00:25:04.640
<v Speaker 5>They which is beyond the realm of science because you

428
00:25:04.680 --> 00:25:08.880
<v Speaker 5>can't examine lots of the concepts I'm talking about empirically.

429
00:25:09.680 --> 00:25:14.200
<v Speaker 5>But a lot of them take the thing of oh well,

430
00:25:14.400 --> 00:25:19.680
<v Speaker 5>I they take materialism, but I don't think materialism describes everything.

431
00:25:20.279 --> 00:25:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Most so you're just making stuff.

432
00:25:23.440 --> 00:25:25.720
<v Speaker 5>No I have I have no I know.

433
00:25:25.880 --> 00:25:27.119
<v Speaker 3>Don't hear me out for a minute.

434
00:25:27.160 --> 00:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>I understand you've got a bunch of things that you

435
00:25:29.279 --> 00:25:32.200
<v Speaker 2>are using evidence, but you put it all together and

436
00:25:32.240 --> 00:25:34.240
<v Speaker 2>you made up what you believe right.

437
00:25:34.079 --> 00:25:37.440
<v Speaker 5>Now using logic. Yes, but that's no, I didn't know.

438
00:25:37.559 --> 00:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I just that's using your logic, yes, right, using your logic.

439
00:25:42.319 --> 00:25:44.680
<v Speaker 2>You took information that you found and you came up

440
00:25:44.720 --> 00:25:48.440
<v Speaker 2>with your own idea correct.

441
00:25:46.799 --> 00:25:49.880
<v Speaker 5>Uh, yes, but taking from.

442
00:25:49.680 --> 00:25:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, now, how do you know that your idea, especially

443
00:25:53.000 --> 00:25:55.640
<v Speaker 2>about metaphysics, How do you know that this is true?

444
00:25:56.160 --> 00:25:59.960
<v Speaker 5>I don't know for sure. I just think if fits

445
00:26:01.039 --> 00:26:03.920
<v Speaker 5>all the evidence with as little assumptions as possible.

446
00:26:03.960 --> 00:26:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a Do you have a do you

447
00:26:06.400 --> 00:26:09.279
<v Speaker 1>have a formal metaphysical have you made a formal metaphysical

448
00:26:09.359 --> 00:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>argument out of your thoughts and ideas?

449
00:26:11.599 --> 00:26:14.680
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I have a formal metaphysical argument.

450
00:26:16.119 --> 00:26:16.359
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

451
00:26:16.400 --> 00:26:18.480
<v Speaker 5>I was reading off of a script I had wrote

452
00:26:18.680 --> 00:26:21.519
<v Speaker 5>in prepared for the show. But I haven't published a

453
00:26:21.559 --> 00:26:22.960
<v Speaker 5>book or a paper on it.

454
00:26:22.680 --> 00:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't been here, Retten. Yeah, I didn't ask that.

455
00:26:26.000 --> 00:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I asked if you'd actually put this into a formal argument.

456
00:26:28.519 --> 00:26:31.039
<v Speaker 1>All right, So it's your first premise, okay.

457
00:26:31.680 --> 00:26:37.519
<v Speaker 5>My first premise was that there is actuality that uh,

458
00:26:37.920 --> 00:26:43.039
<v Speaker 5>that's something exists and beyond beyond skepticism.

459
00:26:43.119 --> 00:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>The information beyond skepticism even means yeah, I don't either. Okay,

460
00:26:51.000 --> 00:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>You've got beyond which indicates some sort of property being

461
00:26:53.920 --> 00:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>beyond something that is a concept called skepticism or a

462
00:26:57.240 --> 00:26:58.559
<v Speaker 1>process or whatever you want to say.

463
00:26:58.559 --> 00:27:01.599
<v Speaker 3>It beyond skepticism makes no sense. Okay.

464
00:27:01.680 --> 00:27:06.839
<v Speaker 5>Well I'm I'm saying, if you doubt something existing, I

465
00:27:06.880 --> 00:27:10.200
<v Speaker 5>think there is one thing that is beyond any doubt

466
00:27:10.279 --> 00:27:14.000
<v Speaker 5>of existing, because any attempt to doubt it, for pre

467
00:27:14.559 --> 00:27:19.359
<v Speaker 5>presupposes that it exists. The idea, the information that exists.

468
00:27:20.759 --> 00:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>There's no If you doubt something, there's no presupposition, then

469
00:27:23.440 --> 00:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you doubt exists.

470
00:27:25.680 --> 00:27:29.519
<v Speaker 5>You're doubting is false.

471
00:27:30.160 --> 00:27:32.519
<v Speaker 3>I doubt Does that mean it? Does?

472
00:27:33.000 --> 00:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I doubt you're made of chocolate? Are you actually made

473
00:27:35.119 --> 00:27:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of chocolate? Do we have an actual chocolate statue talking

474
00:27:37.799 --> 00:27:39.599
<v Speaker 1>to us? Because I doubt you're made of chocolate?

475
00:27:40.000 --> 00:27:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for taking that to the total absurd term.

476
00:27:42.359 --> 00:27:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that. That's awesome.

477
00:27:44.039 --> 00:27:47.400
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, no no. If you what I'm saying

478
00:27:47.480 --> 00:27:51.160
<v Speaker 5>is if you doubt the the that the distinction that

479
00:27:51.880 --> 00:27:55.000
<v Speaker 5>between existence and non existence, you say, oh, I doubt

480
00:27:55.079 --> 00:27:58.960
<v Speaker 5>that you're you're saying I think that's not true. But

481
00:27:59.039 --> 00:28:01.400
<v Speaker 5>thinking that's not true, who relies on the.

482
00:28:03.119 --> 00:28:05.160
<v Speaker 7>Assumption I know?

483
00:28:05.319 --> 00:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>So you forget you forget that.

484
00:28:07.400 --> 00:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>In philosophy, there while it is true that any proposition

485
00:28:11.559 --> 00:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is either true or false, there are three positions you

486
00:28:14.759 --> 00:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>can take. You can accept the proposition is true, you

487
00:28:18.440 --> 00:28:21.799
<v Speaker 1>can reject it as false. And you can also say

488
00:28:21.839 --> 00:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. If I say I don't know, I

489
00:28:24.480 --> 00:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have not taken a position on a proposition being true

490
00:28:28.319 --> 00:28:28.759
<v Speaker 1>or false.

491
00:28:29.759 --> 00:28:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Okay, but fine, But if you're saying you don't know,

492
00:28:32.759 --> 00:28:35.240
<v Speaker 5>doubt arguments.

493
00:28:35.839 --> 00:28:36.559
<v Speaker 3>Only if I say it.

494
00:28:36.920 --> 00:28:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Only if I say the proposition is false, or if

495
00:28:39.599 --> 00:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I say the proposition is true.

496
00:28:41.160 --> 00:28:43.759
<v Speaker 3>Do I need to provide argument for either of these things?

497
00:28:44.079 --> 00:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>If I say I don't know, I'm asking for an

498
00:28:46.480 --> 00:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>argument to or evidence to prove that something is true

499
00:28:50.200 --> 00:28:53.599
<v Speaker 1>or false, to prove that the proposition is true or false.

500
00:28:54.160 --> 00:28:55.519
<v Speaker 3>I can doubt all I want.

501
00:28:56.119 --> 00:28:59.039
<v Speaker 5>Yes, you can be like, I don't know, but fine,

502
00:28:59.079 --> 00:29:03.640
<v Speaker 5>then you have him brought a counter argument to.

503
00:29:03.720 --> 00:29:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't need a counter argument I'm not making. I'm

504
00:29:05.880 --> 00:29:09.839
<v Speaker 1>not making a clam I'm not claiming the proposition is true.

505
00:29:09.880 --> 00:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not claiming the proposition is false. Only when I

506
00:29:13.240 --> 00:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>make either of those claims, do I actually have to

507
00:29:16.240 --> 00:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>provide an argument?

508
00:29:17.720 --> 00:29:22.400
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Well, then then I would say there's no there's

509
00:29:22.480 --> 00:29:25.319
<v Speaker 5>no way to bring a counter I haven't. I don't

510
00:29:25.319 --> 00:29:29.119
<v Speaker 5>see a way to bring a counter argument against what

511
00:29:29.240 --> 00:29:31.279
<v Speaker 5>policy is that it doesn't contradict itself?

512
00:29:31.839 --> 00:29:35.519
<v Speaker 3>And what policy is that? Hey, you can't think of one.

513
00:29:36.160 --> 00:29:40.680
<v Speaker 5>Okay, it's only a fallacy if I'm saying that proves

514
00:29:40.759 --> 00:29:44.799
<v Speaker 5>it that doesn't I could I couuld be. It could

515
00:29:44.799 --> 00:29:47.519
<v Speaker 5>be beyond my perception, and I'm not able to see that.

516
00:29:47.599 --> 00:29:50.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm not saying this is one hundred percent certainty. But

517
00:29:51.400 --> 00:29:53.480
<v Speaker 5>I've said, it's beyond skepticism.

518
00:29:53.559 --> 00:29:57.039
<v Speaker 1>But sane, I don't know peven that man has no meaning,

519
00:29:57.519 --> 00:29:59.079
<v Speaker 1>that that literally has no meaning.

520
00:29:59.680 --> 00:30:02.720
<v Speaker 3>No, those two words together don't mean anything.

521
00:30:03.279 --> 00:30:03.720
<v Speaker 5>It's not.

522
00:30:05.200 --> 00:30:07.960
<v Speaker 6>You're going to say, I don't because I can.

523
00:30:07.839 --> 00:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Take the client. I can take the stand that I

524
00:30:10.079 --> 00:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Right, that's not beyond skepticism.

525
00:30:14.000 --> 00:30:17.200
<v Speaker 5>Oh but you're not. Really, you're not presenting a counter argument.

526
00:30:18.599 --> 00:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to.

527
00:30:20.119 --> 00:30:20.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't have to.

528
00:30:21.440 --> 00:30:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I've got a Let's say I got a thing full

529
00:30:23.880 --> 00:30:28.079
<v Speaker 1>of pens here. You know what, if I say I

530
00:30:28.079 --> 00:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they're odd or even, does that mean

531
00:30:30.160 --> 00:30:32.599
<v Speaker 1>they're odder or are they even? Have I made a

532
00:30:32.759 --> 00:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>claim to whether they're even? There's an odd or even

533
00:30:35.319 --> 00:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>number of pens in my pen?

534
00:30:37.000 --> 00:30:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Cut?

535
00:30:37.480 --> 00:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Have I made a claim as to that? If I

536
00:30:39.279 --> 00:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>say I don't know if it's odd or even, which claim?

537
00:30:42.200 --> 00:30:45.759
<v Speaker 1>If I meant you haven't made a claim, You're right.

538
00:30:47.599 --> 00:30:49.799
<v Speaker 3>That's my point exactly.

539
00:30:50.039 --> 00:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's no such thing as beyond skepticism, because in

540
00:30:53.759 --> 00:30:56.759
<v Speaker 1>order for that to happen, that means that you have

541
00:30:56.880 --> 00:30:59.759
<v Speaker 1>to make a claim about a proposition, either claim that

542
00:30:59.799 --> 00:31:01.279
<v Speaker 1>it is true or that it is false, and you

543
00:31:01.279 --> 00:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. You can simply say I'm waiting further information.

544
00:31:05.160 --> 00:31:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but or are you Are you equating skepticism with cynicism?

545
00:31:10.519 --> 00:31:15.279
<v Speaker 5>Okay, fine, I get I think I was equating skepticism

546
00:31:15.279 --> 00:31:18.960
<v Speaker 5>with cynicism because saying I don't know is skepticism.

547
00:31:19.079 --> 00:31:25.359
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, waiting for evidence before making a decision is

548
00:31:25.400 --> 00:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>also skepticism.

549
00:31:26.799 --> 00:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I really want to understand you, Donald, I really do,

550
00:31:30.079 --> 00:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not sure that you have the language that

551
00:31:32.680 --> 00:31:34.319
<v Speaker 2>you need to communicate it.

552
00:31:34.240 --> 00:31:35.920
<v Speaker 3>In a viable way.

553
00:31:36.319 --> 00:31:39.039
<v Speaker 2>And it's just not it's not just Jemini that don't understand.

554
00:31:39.039 --> 00:31:41.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at the people in the text chat. Nobody

555
00:31:41.279 --> 00:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>really understands what you're trying to get at. Nobody's really

556
00:31:45.039 --> 00:31:47.839
<v Speaker 2>sure what your point has been through this whole a whole.

557
00:31:47.720 --> 00:31:50.680
<v Speaker 5>Argument in a whole script, and it doesn't make sense

558
00:31:50.720 --> 00:31:52.680
<v Speaker 5>if you cut off like near the beginning.

559
00:31:53.119 --> 00:31:56.079
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but we asked, we asked you for premise one,

560
00:31:56.680 --> 00:32:00.759
<v Speaker 1>and your premise one makes no sense and has nothing

561
00:32:00.920 --> 00:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing to agree.

562
00:32:02.160 --> 00:32:02.880
<v Speaker 3>It says nothing.

563
00:32:03.279 --> 00:32:05.119
<v Speaker 2>And we're not going to sit here while you read

564
00:32:05.160 --> 00:32:06.759
<v Speaker 2>your script for twenty minutes either.

565
00:32:06.880 --> 00:32:08.319
<v Speaker 3>That's just not going to en No.

566
00:32:08.240 --> 00:32:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean and premise so we don't even so we

567
00:32:10.880 --> 00:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to go past promise one because it

568
00:32:13.960 --> 00:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>makes no sense. I wing to rejected premise one is nonsensical,

569
00:32:16.960 --> 00:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the argument follows, right, because your

570
00:32:19.559 --> 00:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>argument depends on premise one, just like it depends on

571
00:32:22.039 --> 00:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>all your other premises to get to your conclusion. Right, Okay,

572
00:32:25.440 --> 00:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we've rejected premise one is being nonsensical, so why would

573
00:32:28.799 --> 00:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we accept your conclusion?

574
00:32:30.519 --> 00:32:37.519
<v Speaker 5>Okay, fine, going back to premise one. Okay, you're able

575
00:32:37.559 --> 00:32:42.160
<v Speaker 5>to say, I don't know, but we're but I'm trying

576
00:32:42.279 --> 00:32:48.359
<v Speaker 5>to figure out a base like how a native car goes.

577
00:32:48.640 --> 00:32:50.799
<v Speaker 5>I think therefore, I am. I'm trying to make a

578
00:32:50.839 --> 00:32:56.119
<v Speaker 5>more foundational base for which you can from which you

579
00:32:56.119 --> 00:33:00.480
<v Speaker 5>can build things off of. And if you are not

580
00:33:00.640 --> 00:33:04.599
<v Speaker 5>able to provide a counter argument, well I can. Well

581
00:33:04.680 --> 00:33:07.119
<v Speaker 5>there can be made a counter argument for pretty much

582
00:33:07.200 --> 00:33:11.240
<v Speaker 5>every other base. I would argue that this base is

583
00:33:11.279 --> 00:33:12.839
<v Speaker 5>better than the other ones.

584
00:33:13.480 --> 00:33:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you're gonna make You're gonna make that argument, make

585
00:33:15.640 --> 00:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the argument. Give me your first premise for that argument.

586
00:33:18.440 --> 00:33:23.839
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Okay, I but I okay, this.

587
00:33:23.759 --> 00:33:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Will make an argument. You're no longer in science, You're

588
00:33:27.279 --> 00:33:28.119
<v Speaker 3>in philosophy.

589
00:33:28.640 --> 00:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>When you're talking about metaphysics and things like that, you

590
00:33:31.519 --> 00:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are also in philosophy. I don't think you've got the

591
00:33:33.519 --> 00:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>philosophical grounding, given how bad your first premise is that

592
00:33:38.279 --> 00:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you gave us is to actually do this.

593
00:33:42.640 --> 00:33:45.599
<v Speaker 5>Okay, I don't. I don't that.

594
00:33:46.079 --> 00:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm still not sure what the first premise was.

595
00:33:48.599 --> 00:33:55.240
<v Speaker 5>Okay, the first premise is the information that existence exists.

596
00:33:57.359 --> 00:34:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Is can be given a counter argument too, because you know,

597
00:34:03.960 --> 00:34:09.360
<v Speaker 5>because in trying to say that's false assumes distinction between

598
00:34:09.360 --> 00:34:13.960
<v Speaker 5>true and false and assumes there is a distinction.

599
00:34:14.039 --> 00:34:14.639
<v Speaker 3>No way, don't know.

600
00:34:14.639 --> 00:34:18.079
<v Speaker 2>I don't agree with that, And Jim, that's not something

601
00:34:18.079 --> 00:34:19.480
<v Speaker 2>we can agree with because that's.

602
00:34:19.760 --> 00:34:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Because there's a there's a third position. The default position

603
00:34:23.760 --> 00:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>is I don't know. It's I am right, or we

604
00:34:28.840 --> 00:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>agree with the proposition that there's either existence or non existence.

605
00:34:32.000 --> 00:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>We agree with that, right, those those two things are true.

606
00:34:36.239 --> 00:34:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Now I exist, so I'll beg the claim that because

607
00:34:39.239 --> 00:34:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I exist, there is something that exists.

608
00:34:42.239 --> 00:34:43.400
<v Speaker 5>Yes, that's what I'm saying.

609
00:34:43.519 --> 00:34:46.719
<v Speaker 3>What right? And so what something exists?

610
00:34:46.880 --> 00:34:52.159
<v Speaker 5>So what? Okay, that's the first premise that something exist.

611
00:34:52.400 --> 00:34:54.159
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you could have just said that it would have

612
00:34:54.159 --> 00:34:55.599
<v Speaker 3>made a little bit. This is true.

613
00:34:55.760 --> 00:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, okay, okay.

614
00:34:59.519 --> 00:35:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Number one the things number one? Things exist? What's number two?

615
00:35:05.880 --> 00:35:09.519
<v Speaker 5>Now if I say existence is true, that's different from

616
00:35:09.519 --> 00:35:10.920
<v Speaker 5>saying exists.

617
00:35:11.079 --> 00:35:12.960
<v Speaker 6>The information of existence exists.

618
00:35:13.320 --> 00:35:16.880
<v Speaker 5>Those are two separate things. Because now you're gaining the abstract.

619
00:35:16.480 --> 00:35:18.719
<v Speaker 3>Which one, which one is your which one is your friend?

620
00:35:21.800 --> 00:35:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what I thought too, and you even agreed

621
00:35:23.920 --> 00:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to that. So what actually is your first premise? And

622
00:35:27.039 --> 00:35:29.639
<v Speaker 2>can you please put it down the one simple sentence

623
00:35:29.920 --> 00:35:31.840
<v Speaker 2>act like Jimini are five year olds.

624
00:35:32.239 --> 00:35:38.760
<v Speaker 5>The information that existence exists exists.

625
00:35:38.599 --> 00:35:42.119
<v Speaker 3>So information exists? Is that? Which is that it? And

626
00:35:42.280 --> 00:35:43.440
<v Speaker 3>information exists?

627
00:35:44.880 --> 00:35:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Or are you saying that because because information Because what

628
00:35:47.800 --> 00:35:51.599
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like you said was because information exists, it exists,

629
00:35:52.119 --> 00:35:53.239
<v Speaker 2>which is atality.

630
00:35:53.960 --> 00:35:58.880
<v Speaker 5>I said existence, the information of existence exists. And in

631
00:35:58.960 --> 00:36:03.960
<v Speaker 5>this information is a structured distinction between possible states.

632
00:36:03.920 --> 00:36:05.960
<v Speaker 2>That you're just added stuff on that you didn't have

633
00:36:06.039 --> 00:36:07.599
<v Speaker 2>on there, but you're just added a whole bunch of

634
00:36:07.639 --> 00:36:09.119
<v Speaker 2>other stuff that wasn't there before.

635
00:36:09.719 --> 00:36:12.039
<v Speaker 5>I have to use language, and I have to define

636
00:36:12.079 --> 00:36:12.519
<v Speaker 5>my time.

637
00:36:12.800 --> 00:36:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I get it.

638
00:36:14.000 --> 00:36:16.920
<v Speaker 2>I get it, Donald, I understand you need to use language,

639
00:36:16.960 --> 00:36:19.119
<v Speaker 2>but we've Jim and I have asked you for your

640
00:36:19.159 --> 00:36:22.800
<v Speaker 2>first premise like six times, and every time you have

641
00:36:22.960 --> 00:36:24.599
<v Speaker 2>given us a different thing.

642
00:36:26.239 --> 00:36:29.199
<v Speaker 5>So we don't know what that existence exists.

643
00:36:29.679 --> 00:36:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, information that exists exists. That's a toutology.

644
00:36:32.800 --> 00:36:34.039
<v Speaker 6>No no, no, no, no no no no no no.

645
00:36:34.360 --> 00:36:39.840
<v Speaker 5>The information of exist.

646
00:36:39.159 --> 00:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Exists, okay, information of exist?

647
00:36:43.440 --> 00:36:47.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, information that things exist exists, do not. You're at

648
00:36:47.199 --> 00:36:50.320
<v Speaker 3>anything topology. You see how bad you're doing at this

649
00:36:50.440 --> 00:36:51.039
<v Speaker 3>first premise.

650
00:36:51.440 --> 00:36:53.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you're I think you need to get

651
00:36:53.719 --> 00:36:55.360
<v Speaker 2>better at the communication part.

652
00:36:55.880 --> 00:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you need to get better at your at

653
00:36:57.320 --> 00:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>your definition too, because if you define information in a

654
00:37:01.800 --> 00:37:04.679
<v Speaker 1>way that that physicists define it a measurable property or

655
00:37:05.039 --> 00:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a measurable physical property of a system, right, then then

656
00:37:09.320 --> 00:37:15.599
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that a measurable physical property of a system exists. Okay.

657
00:37:17.400 --> 00:37:22.000
<v Speaker 5>No, that that's another that's another layer of measurement. That's

658
00:37:22.199 --> 00:37:24.400
<v Speaker 5>that that's not as fundamental as this.

659
00:37:26.320 --> 00:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>A measurable physical property is not fundamental because you.

660
00:37:30.559 --> 00:37:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Can have information that isn't measurable. There is truth that

661
00:37:34.880 --> 00:37:38.360
<v Speaker 5>is that can be beyond the ability to test and

662
00:37:38.440 --> 00:37:39.639
<v Speaker 5>observe and falsify.

663
00:37:40.199 --> 00:37:41.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure there's a claim.

664
00:37:42.440 --> 00:37:45.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how to measure information to begin with.

665
00:37:45.239 --> 00:37:48.239
<v Speaker 2>You can measure the veracity of information, but how do

666
00:37:48.280 --> 00:37:49.599
<v Speaker 2>you measure information?

667
00:37:50.280 --> 00:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, now you just made an even bigger claim that

668
00:37:53.000 --> 00:37:58.320
<v Speaker 1>makes absolutely no sense, because I mean information is the

669
00:37:58.360 --> 00:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>measurement this. I think you've got a problem with your definition,

670
00:38:03.480 --> 00:38:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think you don't have enough philosophy background because

671
00:38:07.000 --> 00:38:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I am not, by any means a philosopher, and we

672
00:38:10.679 --> 00:38:14.159
<v Speaker 1>can't get past your your first premise and figure out

673
00:38:14.159 --> 00:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what the heck you even mean by it, because it

674
00:38:16.519 --> 00:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to mean anything. You're redefining information in a

675
00:38:20.320 --> 00:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>way that makes absolutely zero sense, and so I think

676
00:38:25.960 --> 00:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that's where you need to start. But this is this

677
00:38:28.840 --> 00:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is just I think as a fundamental probably not understanding philosophy,

678
00:38:32.440 --> 00:38:35.039
<v Speaker 1>much less any type of metaphysics.

679
00:38:36.679 --> 00:38:41.119
<v Speaker 5>I have many a lot of metaphysics and I have.

680
00:38:41.519 --> 00:38:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why you're so bad at this, Yeah, right,

681
00:38:44.239 --> 00:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why you're so bad at it, right,

682
00:38:47.199 --> 00:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's my point.

683
00:38:48.440 --> 00:38:50.480
<v Speaker 3>You're bad at it. I think rather than read, you

684
00:38:50.519 --> 00:38:51.159
<v Speaker 3>may need to go.

685
00:38:51.119 --> 00:38:53.639
<v Speaker 1>And run some of this through a philosophy you know,

686
00:38:54.079 --> 00:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>get a physics professor, Get someone who's got at least

687
00:38:57.320 --> 00:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a PhD a quantum physics and a pH stein philosophy,

688
00:39:00.840 --> 00:39:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and how and run this by them and see if

689
00:39:02.920 --> 00:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense to them.

690
00:39:05.119 --> 00:39:07.079
<v Speaker 3>I think I think they will. I think they will

691
00:39:07.199 --> 00:39:07.920
<v Speaker 3>buzz saw.

692
00:39:07.760 --> 00:39:10.039
<v Speaker 1>You into in and non existence on this because this

693
00:39:10.239 --> 00:39:11.119
<v Speaker 1>makes zero sense.

694
00:39:11.599 --> 00:39:14.800
<v Speaker 5>Okay, well, it could just happen I'm bad at explaining,

695
00:39:14.920 --> 00:39:16.840
<v Speaker 5>or you don't understand what I'm saying.

696
00:39:17.039 --> 00:39:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, so the problem is that in communication,

697
00:39:20.280 --> 00:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the sender is responsible for making sure they're understoody okay, Well.

698
00:39:25.000 --> 00:39:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Like I like, I'll often go to like a classroom

699
00:39:28.760 --> 00:39:32.679
<v Speaker 2>of third or fourth graders, and I'll explain geological concepts

700
00:39:32.679 --> 00:39:36.039
<v Speaker 2>to them so that they can understand it. Right, you know,

701
00:39:36.079 --> 00:39:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I could understand. I could teach them about plate tectonics

702
00:39:38.920 --> 00:39:42.639
<v Speaker 2>and and different types of erosion, right, and they're they're

703
00:39:42.679 --> 00:39:45.559
<v Speaker 2>pretty pretty intense concepts, but I can explain it to

704
00:39:45.599 --> 00:39:47.480
<v Speaker 2>a five year old. And I think that's when of

705
00:39:47.519 --> 00:39:50.320
<v Speaker 2>the problems we're having is they're not You're not able

706
00:39:50.360 --> 00:39:54.159
<v Speaker 2>to vocalize the concept that you're thinking of in a

707
00:39:54.199 --> 00:39:57.880
<v Speaker 2>way that's understandable by others, at least by us and

708
00:39:57.920 --> 00:39:59.440
<v Speaker 2>the people who are watching the show.

709
00:40:00.880 --> 00:40:05.400
<v Speaker 6>Okay, Okay, let me try it a different way.

710
00:40:05.960 --> 00:40:11.719
<v Speaker 5>Okay, you're familiar with the term I think, therefore I

711
00:40:11.800 --> 00:40:21.840
<v Speaker 5>am right. But yes, okay, phrase okay, in that he's assuming, Uh,

712
00:40:21.960 --> 00:40:27.360
<v Speaker 5>he's assuming things about what I what I is, and

713
00:40:27.400 --> 00:40:32.639
<v Speaker 5>he's assuming and things about about his memory being accurate

714
00:40:32.639 --> 00:40:36.960
<v Speaker 5>of remembering his thoughts and uh, and he's assuming thought

715
00:40:38.519 --> 00:40:42.199
<v Speaker 5>and he's assuming thought. If you strip away memory, you

716
00:40:42.239 --> 00:40:46.400
<v Speaker 5>strip away time, you strip away the concept of I,

717
00:40:46.440 --> 00:40:53.039
<v Speaker 5>you get down to uh, you get down to uh,

718
00:40:53.159 --> 00:40:58.519
<v Speaker 5>there's exists and there's not exist. Even when even when

719
00:40:58.559 --> 00:41:02.280
<v Speaker 5>trying to think about it, strip away even the concept

720
00:41:02.320 --> 00:41:06.280
<v Speaker 5>of thought and you memory in your memorizing thought. There

721
00:41:06.480 --> 00:41:12.440
<v Speaker 5>is a distinction of exists versus non exist. There is

722
00:41:12.480 --> 00:41:14.039
<v Speaker 5>the information.

723
00:41:13.599 --> 00:41:16.719
<v Speaker 3>Of exist, the information of exist.

724
00:41:17.360 --> 00:41:20.039
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that that that that's what we're that's

725
00:41:20.039 --> 00:41:23.119
<v Speaker 2>what we're having a fundamental problem when you say the

726
00:41:23.199 --> 00:41:28.760
<v Speaker 2>information of exist. That makes absolutely no fucking sense to us.

727
00:41:29.079 --> 00:41:32.119
<v Speaker 5>Okay, there is a distinction between exists and non exists,

728
00:41:32.559 --> 00:41:33.239
<v Speaker 5>that distinction.

729
00:41:33.559 --> 00:41:36.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we did that, but we're trying to Yes, we're

730
00:41:36.599 --> 00:41:39.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to explain to you that when you say information

731
00:41:40.000 --> 00:41:42.480
<v Speaker 2>and you put it in that slot, that's the part

732
00:41:42.519 --> 00:41:45.199
<v Speaker 2>that's not making sense. What you said up until that

733
00:41:45.239 --> 00:41:46.599
<v Speaker 2>point totally made sense.

734
00:41:47.119 --> 00:41:51.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Well, fine, I won't say information. I'll say the structure,

735
00:41:52.119 --> 00:41:55.880
<v Speaker 5>the distinction between exists and non exists exists.

736
00:41:56.280 --> 00:41:57.800
<v Speaker 3>That's a tautology, I agree.

737
00:41:58.039 --> 00:42:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that you're eximply saying is either true or not true.

738
00:42:02.679 --> 00:42:07.039
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, yeah, things, Yeah, things are aren't Okay, we

739
00:42:07.119 --> 00:42:07.599
<v Speaker 2>all know that.

740
00:42:07.960 --> 00:42:08.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

741
00:42:09.039 --> 00:42:10.159
<v Speaker 6>That's like that's like.

742
00:42:10.119 --> 00:42:12.480
<v Speaker 2>The first law of logic, right, the law of identity,

743
00:42:12.519 --> 00:42:17.400
<v Speaker 2>basically just in different words. Okay, okay, okay, So that's

744
00:42:17.400 --> 00:42:19.239
<v Speaker 2>your first premise, the law of identity.

745
00:42:19.920 --> 00:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, first promise the law of identity is true. Okay, Well,

746
00:42:24.480 --> 00:42:27.159
<v Speaker 1>we kind of assume that, but you know, it's.

747
00:42:27.079 --> 00:42:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Okay, there's there's a difference between this and the law

748
00:42:30.360 --> 00:42:30.960
<v Speaker 5>of identity.

749
00:42:31.480 --> 00:42:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Okay, there is because if I remember the law of

750
00:42:37.239 --> 00:42:42.079
<v Speaker 1>I do a lot of identity is is a non contradiction?

751
00:42:42.280 --> 00:42:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Is A or not a? So yeah, it's it's the

752
00:42:45.519 --> 00:42:47.199
<v Speaker 3>law of non contradiction. We have the wrong law.

753
00:42:47.840 --> 00:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>The law of non contradiction is true. Yes, we assume, yes,

754
00:42:51.559 --> 00:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that the laws of lot. When we're making philosophical arguments

755
00:42:54.960 --> 00:42:57.519
<v Speaker 1>like you're attempting to do, we assume that laws of

756
00:42:57.599 --> 00:42:58.199
<v Speaker 1>logic apply.

757
00:42:58.440 --> 00:43:00.719
<v Speaker 3>So okay, so what Okay, I.

758
00:43:00.639 --> 00:43:05.039
<v Speaker 5>Want to be clear. The law of identity isn't always true,

759
00:43:05.199 --> 00:43:08.280
<v Speaker 5>like not all of these laws are always true, but the.

760
00:43:08.239 --> 00:43:14.400
<v Speaker 3>Law when is the law of identity not true? Okay?

761
00:43:14.440 --> 00:43:18.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, if someone says an apple is an apple, you

762
00:43:18.920 --> 00:43:22.039
<v Speaker 5>they're they have a concept of an apple. But those

763
00:43:22.039 --> 00:43:24.559
<v Speaker 5>two apples aren't identical.

764
00:43:24.599 --> 00:43:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Two apples we're talking.

765
00:43:25.559 --> 00:43:28.079
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about one apple, but you're also talking about

766
00:43:28.119 --> 00:43:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the physical thing that is an apple that has physical

767
00:43:30.800 --> 00:43:33.559
<v Speaker 1>properties and the person's concept of an apple.

768
00:43:33.599 --> 00:43:36.320
<v Speaker 3>And you are correct, the person's concept of that apple

769
00:43:36.840 --> 00:43:37.679
<v Speaker 3>is not the apple.

770
00:43:37.800 --> 00:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Like I have been saying, you have been confusing the

771
00:43:42.239 --> 00:43:46.360
<v Speaker 1>map for the territory. The map is the person's concept

772
00:43:46.360 --> 00:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of an apple. Yes, you are correct. There is the

773
00:43:49.480 --> 00:43:51.039
<v Speaker 1>difference between those two things.

774
00:43:51.440 --> 00:43:51.719
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

775
00:43:51.960 --> 00:43:55.039
<v Speaker 5>And when people use the law of identity to take

776
00:43:55.119 --> 00:43:59.519
<v Speaker 5>a concept and it's a it's a it's an abstruction.

777
00:44:00.119 --> 00:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about two different a's, right, A prime the

778
00:44:05.440 --> 00:44:09.159
<v Speaker 1>apple itself A second. Yeah, that is the thought. Those

779
00:44:09.199 --> 00:44:10.880
<v Speaker 1>are two different a's. They are not the same thing.

780
00:44:11.400 --> 00:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>You have an A. You have an A and the

781
00:44:12.800 --> 00:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>B and A is not equal B. They're not the

782
00:44:15.400 --> 00:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing. We've already agreed that the apple, the physical apple,

783
00:44:20.199 --> 00:44:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is a different thing than the conception, the concept of

784
00:44:22.840 --> 00:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the apple that is in someone's head. Those are not

785
00:44:25.400 --> 00:44:28.360
<v Speaker 1>both a's They can't because they're two different things.

786
00:44:30.280 --> 00:44:36.079
<v Speaker 5>Okay, but okay, well this is game tangential to the argument.

787
00:44:36.159 --> 00:44:39.079
<v Speaker 3>But no, it's not. It's fundamental to the argument. Yeah,

788
00:44:39.119 --> 00:44:39.760
<v Speaker 3>it totally is.

789
00:44:40.280 --> 00:44:42.320
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's what we're having a problem is

790
00:44:42.320 --> 00:44:44.039
<v Speaker 2>that you don't understand that, babe.

791
00:44:44.960 --> 00:44:46.559
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm not sure. I'm not sure.

792
00:44:46.920 --> 00:44:49.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure, Donald, I'm not sure you have this

793
00:44:49.559 --> 00:44:52.400
<v Speaker 2>whole argument fully put together, step to step to step

794
00:44:52.440 --> 00:44:55.239
<v Speaker 2>to step. And it might be just because you're communicating

795
00:44:55.280 --> 00:44:59.119
<v Speaker 2>it badly, but it doesn't. It just doesn't seem like it. Okay,

796
00:45:00.599 --> 00:45:02.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying you have a bad argument. I'm just

797
00:45:02.480 --> 00:45:05.679
<v Speaker 2>saying the way you're communicating isn't working out, man, because

798
00:45:05.719 --> 00:45:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I because I honestly I really don't understand what it

799
00:45:08.559 --> 00:45:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is you're trying to communicate.

800
00:45:11.440 --> 00:45:16.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I was going, I was going from things have

801
00:45:16.800 --> 00:45:21.639
<v Speaker 5>potentials and then they're actualized, and I was trying to

802
00:45:21.719 --> 00:45:29.159
<v Speaker 5>get to an argument to uh, giving to try to

803
00:45:29.159 --> 00:45:34.480
<v Speaker 5>to try to establish the unactualized actualizer.

804
00:45:34.400 --> 00:45:37.079
<v Speaker 3>Right, and we can't get past promise one. Yeah, so

805
00:45:37.119 --> 00:45:39.159
<v Speaker 3>how yeah, we can't get that get there unless we

806
00:45:39.199 --> 00:45:39.599
<v Speaker 3>get passed.

807
00:45:39.880 --> 00:45:41.960
<v Speaker 5>You just agree to You just agreed to it as

808
00:45:42.000 --> 00:45:43.480
<v Speaker 5>a You just.

809
00:45:43.440 --> 00:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Agree You said that, wasn't it when we when we

810
00:45:45.480 --> 00:45:48.280
<v Speaker 1>said that the concept of the apple is B and

811
00:45:48.320 --> 00:45:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the apple itself is A, and those two things are

812
00:45:51.480 --> 00:45:52.280
<v Speaker 1>not the same thing.

813
00:45:52.800 --> 00:45:58.079
<v Speaker 5>You said, no, No, okay, I am agreeing to the

814
00:45:58.159 --> 00:46:01.800
<v Speaker 5>law of non contradiction. But I was some people if

815
00:46:01.840 --> 00:46:06.599
<v Speaker 5>you do the law of identity outside of mathematics, there's

816
00:46:06.679 --> 00:46:11.360
<v Speaker 5>not there's not a perfect A and this.

817
00:46:11.440 --> 00:46:13.960
<v Speaker 3>A because you doesn't need to be able to tru one.

818
00:46:14.000 --> 00:46:15.000
<v Speaker 3>We're not saying there is.

819
00:46:15.519 --> 00:46:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was going there as a concept of an apple,

820
00:46:18.199 --> 00:46:20.639
<v Speaker 1>those are A N B, not A and A.

821
00:46:20.760 --> 00:46:21.320
<v Speaker 7>I'm trying.

822
00:46:21.840 --> 00:46:26.519
<v Speaker 5>I'm trying to say the law of identity is is

823
00:46:26.559 --> 00:46:30.880
<v Speaker 5>an approximate law. It's an abstract in mathematics to to

824
00:46:30.960 --> 00:46:33.639
<v Speaker 5>where we limit, to where we eliminate.

825
00:46:33.719 --> 00:46:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Hown't demonstrated that fact at all.

826
00:46:35.960 --> 00:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, because you continually confuse the map for the territory.

827
00:46:40.360 --> 00:46:43.199
<v Speaker 1>The map is a thing, the territory is another thing,

828
00:46:43.320 --> 00:46:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and they are not the same.

829
00:46:44.320 --> 00:46:44.519
<v Speaker 3>Thing.

830
00:46:44.960 --> 00:46:48.079
<v Speaker 1>Therefore, the law of identity still holds. You haven't demonstrated

831
00:46:48.360 --> 00:46:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that the law of identity doesn't hold because you're confusing

832
00:46:51.800 --> 00:46:54.119
<v Speaker 1>two things that are distinct.

833
00:46:54.719 --> 00:46:58.280
<v Speaker 3>The map and the territory are distinct. Okay, do you.

834
00:46:58.360 --> 00:47:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Understand what Jim means by the map and that map

835
00:47:01.039 --> 00:47:02.000
<v Speaker 2>is not the territory.

836
00:47:02.559 --> 00:47:07.599
<v Speaker 5>Yes, your your perception and thoughts and conception of reality

837
00:47:07.719 --> 00:47:12.000
<v Speaker 5>isn't the same thing as reality. The right's phenomena and

838
00:47:12.039 --> 00:47:12.800
<v Speaker 5>there's numena.

839
00:47:12.920 --> 00:47:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I understand different and they're not the same thing.

840
00:47:17.079 --> 00:47:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So you by by saying that you haven't proven that

841
00:47:20.440 --> 00:47:22.199
<v Speaker 1>the law of identity is not always true.

842
00:47:24.000 --> 00:47:25.639
<v Speaker 3>Okay, because.

843
00:47:28.480 --> 00:47:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Okay, okay. The simple syllogism uh starts with the proposition

844
00:47:36.440 --> 00:47:39.960
<v Speaker 5>that A is equal to A. This postulate is accepted

845
00:47:40.000 --> 00:47:46.880
<v Speaker 5>as an axiom and but but in reality, outside of mathematics,

846
00:47:46.880 --> 00:47:51.079
<v Speaker 5>outside of our conception in the in a.

847
00:47:51.400 --> 00:47:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Is well, Kenny, wait a minute before we go any further, Donald,

848
00:47:55.480 --> 00:47:58.599
<v Speaker 2>why do we need mathematics to see that A equals A?

849
00:47:58.679 --> 00:48:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Why do we need mathematics to see the two things

850
00:48:00.960 --> 00:48:01.719
<v Speaker 2>are the same.

851
00:48:02.199 --> 00:48:04.559
<v Speaker 5>So we can do things like algebra?

852
00:48:04.679 --> 00:48:07.119
<v Speaker 2>And why do we why do we need to do

853
00:48:07.199 --> 00:48:10.039
<v Speaker 2>algebra between two things that are the same. I don't

854
00:48:10.119 --> 00:48:13.760
<v Speaker 2>understand why you're putting mathematics into this. A equals a

855
00:48:13.840 --> 00:48:17.360
<v Speaker 2>what it's It's like you're complicating it by adding something

856
00:48:17.400 --> 00:48:17.760
<v Speaker 2>into it.

857
00:48:17.880 --> 00:48:20.159
<v Speaker 3>Just dude, the thing is the thing.

858
00:48:20.239 --> 00:48:23.679
<v Speaker 5>Well, actually that mathematics needs to work.

859
00:48:23.960 --> 00:48:28.920
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, that's fine, that's fine. Mathematics needs that, right,

860
00:48:29.199 --> 00:48:32.480
<v Speaker 2>But it doesn't need the mathematics. That's what I'm trying

861
00:48:32.480 --> 00:48:32.920
<v Speaker 2>to say.

862
00:48:33.440 --> 00:48:36.599
<v Speaker 1>Is it ever possible for this pen ever be not

863
00:48:36.679 --> 00:48:40.639
<v Speaker 1>this or for this pen do not be itself? Not

864
00:48:40.760 --> 00:48:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the concept of the pen, the pen, the physical pen itself.

865
00:48:43.239 --> 00:48:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible for that to happen?

866
00:48:47.800 --> 00:48:48.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

867
00:48:48.280 --> 00:48:52.039
<v Speaker 5>If it depends on how you're defining the pen, because

868
00:48:52.039 --> 00:48:54.320
<v Speaker 5>a part of the pen could be replaced, And then

869
00:48:54.480 --> 00:48:55.360
<v Speaker 5>is that the same pen?

870
00:48:55.599 --> 00:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>We're not getting into the ship of theseus?

871
00:48:57.480 --> 00:49:00.000
<v Speaker 3>We're not doing the ship of theseus? Is it okay?

872
00:49:00.039 --> 00:49:01.559
<v Speaker 3>And kill doing that?

873
00:49:01.559 --> 00:49:07.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a whole different thing. This pen as it exists

874
00:49:07.559 --> 00:49:10.599
<v Speaker 1>right now, with this amount of ink in it, Can

875
00:49:10.599 --> 00:49:12.039
<v Speaker 1>it ever not be this thing?

876
00:49:12.599 --> 00:49:15.480
<v Speaker 5>It changes when it loses ink, yes.

877
00:49:15.920 --> 00:49:17.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's still this thing.

878
00:49:17.679 --> 00:49:17.840
<v Speaker 6>No.

879
00:49:17.920 --> 00:49:19.679
<v Speaker 1>But we could say that, we could say that that

880
00:49:20.079 --> 00:49:23.039
<v Speaker 1>it has a state of the is full of ink

881
00:49:23.440 --> 00:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and when say it has a state of not full

882
00:49:25.280 --> 00:49:25.559
<v Speaker 1>of ink.

883
00:49:26.119 --> 00:49:30.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but fundamentally that connect, that connection you're making, that

884
00:49:31.239 --> 00:49:33.920
<v Speaker 5>link is that's.

885
00:49:33.760 --> 00:49:37.760
<v Speaker 1>A property of the pen. That can change. Is the

886
00:49:37.800 --> 00:49:38.679
<v Speaker 1>property of the pen.

887
00:49:38.800 --> 00:49:42.519
<v Speaker 5>The pen you're making an abstraction of a pen. The

888
00:49:43.480 --> 00:49:46.519
<v Speaker 5>idea of the pen itself isn't the most fundamental thing.

889
00:49:46.639 --> 00:49:50.960
<v Speaker 5>It is an abstraction, an abstraction the thing and.

890
00:49:51.199 --> 00:49:53.079
<v Speaker 3>Is not themental thing we're talking about.

891
00:49:54.840 --> 00:50:03.360
<v Speaker 5>Ah, I'm I'm saying it's how it depends on how

892
00:50:03.400 --> 00:50:06.840
<v Speaker 5>you're defining the pen, because there are.

893
00:50:06.800 --> 00:50:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Depend right here is what I see, what I feel,

894
00:50:10.320 --> 00:50:12.239
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing, all the properties of this pen or

895
00:50:12.280 --> 00:50:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the pen we're talking about.

896
00:50:13.719 --> 00:50:14.800
<v Speaker 3>That's how I'm defining this.

897
00:50:16.480 --> 00:50:21.559
<v Speaker 5>Okay, well, then yes, the pen can change because the

898
00:50:21.599 --> 00:50:24.280
<v Speaker 5>pen can change states, or your senses of the pen

899
00:50:24.360 --> 00:50:25.119
<v Speaker 5>can change.

900
00:50:25.679 --> 00:50:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Right. Is it still the same pen?

901
00:50:30.000 --> 00:50:33.280
<v Speaker 5>I okay, there's still the.

902
00:50:33.880 --> 00:50:37.599
<v Speaker 1>If this pen is if I write until there's no

903
00:50:37.679 --> 00:50:38.800
<v Speaker 1>more incoing this pen?

904
00:50:39.679 --> 00:50:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Is that a different pen? Or is it the same pen.

905
00:50:42.480 --> 00:50:45.000
<v Speaker 5>In some sense of the word. Yes, it is a

906
00:50:45.039 --> 00:50:50.000
<v Speaker 5>different it's different. It's not the same. It has changed.

907
00:50:49.719 --> 00:50:52.679
<v Speaker 3>State right if? Right?

908
00:50:52.719 --> 00:50:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's the problem that is a problem. Right, but

909
00:50:55.880 --> 00:50:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it is still the same pen, right.

910
00:50:59.760 --> 00:51:03.840
<v Speaker 5>There is a there is It came from the previous pen,

911
00:51:04.000 --> 00:51:07.000
<v Speaker 5>and there is a and you have a unifying concept

912
00:51:07.119 --> 00:51:10.760
<v Speaker 5>between the previous pen and this pen. So some things

913
00:51:10.800 --> 00:51:13.119
<v Speaker 5>did stay the same and some things changed.

914
00:51:13.760 --> 00:51:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, do those properties mean as the thing they're describing

915
00:51:17.960 --> 00:51:19.519
<v Speaker 1>is different, is a different thing?

916
00:51:20.280 --> 00:51:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Yes, there, it is a different thing on some level.

917
00:51:23.440 --> 00:51:24.639
<v Speaker 5>There's parts that changed.

918
00:51:25.199 --> 00:51:27.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's a every time a property on this pen changes.

919
00:51:27.880 --> 00:51:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Every time I write with this pen, it becomes a

920
00:51:30.400 --> 00:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>different pen than the one I'm holding.

921
00:51:31.960 --> 00:51:32.760
<v Speaker 3>How does that happen?

922
00:51:34.239 --> 00:51:40.639
<v Speaker 5>It's changing its state and it's in it branches and

923
00:51:40.760 --> 00:51:44.159
<v Speaker 5>becomes the other pen through the action. But some of

924
00:51:44.199 --> 00:51:49.519
<v Speaker 5>its potential potential becomes became actual and it changes and

925
00:51:49.599 --> 00:51:52.320
<v Speaker 5>some of the ink went from the pin onto the paper.

926
00:51:52.960 --> 00:51:56.159
<v Speaker 1>And you, yes, I'm agreeing with that. I don't like

927
00:51:56.239 --> 00:51:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that was my description, right, you haven't answered the question.

928
00:51:59.360 --> 00:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You would just read stated my description.

929
00:52:02.079 --> 00:52:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, you're asking how it happens? Do you want me to.

930
00:52:04.760 --> 00:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Describe how does this become a different pen when I

931
00:52:08.760 --> 00:52:09.320
<v Speaker 1>write with it?

932
00:52:09.920 --> 00:52:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Okay? The point on the pen interacts with the paper

933
00:52:15.119 --> 00:52:17.760
<v Speaker 5>and releases some of the ink and some.

934
00:52:18.039 --> 00:52:20.000
<v Speaker 1>There are all properties of writing, and there are all

935
00:52:20.039 --> 00:52:23.039
<v Speaker 1>properties of the pen. Yes, you asked me how did

936
00:52:22.800 --> 00:52:26.119
<v Speaker 1>it describe? How how does it write? And you basically

937
00:52:26.119 --> 00:52:29.039
<v Speaker 1>described the process of writing. What you haven't described is

938
00:52:29.039 --> 00:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>how this becomes a different pen.

939
00:52:31.599 --> 00:52:36.239
<v Speaker 5>It lost some of its atoms and it has a

940
00:52:36.280 --> 00:52:41.320
<v Speaker 5>slightly different property some of it. It became different, it changed.

941
00:52:41.480 --> 00:52:43.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but that doesn't mean it's a new pen.

942
00:52:45.679 --> 00:52:49.400
<v Speaker 5>You Your abstract concept of the pen and it being

943
00:52:49.559 --> 00:52:55.679
<v Speaker 5>the same thing is is an approximation. It's it's it's perception.

944
00:52:55.960 --> 00:52:56.920
<v Speaker 3>It's I'm not talking.

945
00:52:57.039 --> 00:52:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about my perception of the pen. Talking

946
00:52:59.360 --> 00:53:01.440
<v Speaker 1>about the pen it's off and what it's actually doing,

947
00:53:01.480 --> 00:53:04.559
<v Speaker 1>not my concept of it.

948
00:53:04.559 --> 00:53:09.960
<v Speaker 2>It's the concept, No, not itself is the pen?

949
00:53:10.480 --> 00:53:11.000
<v Speaker 3>You are.

950
00:53:12.480 --> 00:53:16.039
<v Speaker 2>The concept comes from a brain. The concept doesn't come

951
00:53:16.079 --> 00:53:18.719
<v Speaker 2>from the pen. The concept comes from a brain. You

952
00:53:18.719 --> 00:53:20.840
<v Speaker 2>ever see that painting that's a pipe and it says

953
00:53:20.880 --> 00:53:22.320
<v Speaker 2>this is not a pipe in French?

954
00:53:26.960 --> 00:53:28.920
<v Speaker 1>You should go look at it for a while. Yeah,

955
00:53:29.760 --> 00:53:30.559
<v Speaker 1>it's a fun one.

956
00:53:31.039 --> 00:53:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're trying to make something of illusions.

957
00:53:35.079 --> 00:53:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Right.

958
00:53:36.920 --> 00:53:38.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the fundamental problem that I think you're having

959
00:53:39.280 --> 00:53:42.199
<v Speaker 1>is I don't think you under you're you're trying to

960
00:53:42.239 --> 00:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>make the first law of logic not be true. And

961
00:53:47.880 --> 00:53:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I think the other fundamental problem is is what is

962
00:53:50.639 --> 00:53:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the identity right the ship of theseus? And is this

963
00:53:55.840 --> 00:53:59.679
<v Speaker 1>problem is why? I really, I mean, it's still the

964
00:53:59.679 --> 00:54:02.519
<v Speaker 1>ship of theseus. And I can give you a better example,

965
00:54:02.719 --> 00:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just because I'm a software engineer. When we want to

966
00:54:05.840 --> 00:54:08.880
<v Speaker 1>define what a record is, we use a field that

967
00:54:08.920 --> 00:54:11.519
<v Speaker 1>has absolutely nothing to do with the record, and if

968
00:54:11.559 --> 00:54:13.519
<v Speaker 1>that field is different, it is a different object and

969
00:54:13.719 --> 00:54:16.840
<v Speaker 1>have the exact same properties. But if that id field

970
00:54:16.880 --> 00:54:19.559
<v Speaker 1>is different, few different objects. But if you're the same,

971
00:54:20.239 --> 00:54:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the alls they've done is change state, and we need

972
00:54:21.960 --> 00:54:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to track that state.

973
00:54:23.280 --> 00:54:24.960
<v Speaker 3>But that doesn't mean it's a different thing. And this

974
00:54:25.079 --> 00:54:25.840
<v Speaker 3>is the problem.

975
00:54:26.280 --> 00:54:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Right, the pen can lose ink, it's still the pen

976
00:54:30.320 --> 00:54:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is It's a property that doesn't make it unique or different.

977
00:54:36.039 --> 00:54:40.679
<v Speaker 5>Okay, you can define the atoms taking that form in

978
00:54:40.719 --> 00:54:44.320
<v Speaker 5>it having the utility of writing to still be a pen.

979
00:54:44.719 --> 00:54:48.320
<v Speaker 5>But again I'm saying that that is an abstraction. It's

980
00:54:48.360 --> 00:54:51.599
<v Speaker 5>a useful abstraction, which is close to the truth, but

981
00:54:51.639 --> 00:54:53.199
<v Speaker 5>it's not fundamentally.

982
00:54:53.239 --> 00:54:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Fully, you're saying that this pen has stopped being a pen,

983
00:54:56.519 --> 00:54:59.519
<v Speaker 1>and I have a new different pen when I drive ink.

984
00:54:59.559 --> 00:55:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is an actual, real thing that we're talking about.

985
00:55:02.360 --> 00:55:04.639
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about the concept of it. We're talking

986
00:55:04.639 --> 00:55:07.199
<v Speaker 1>about the real thing. And my question is is how

987
00:55:07.199 --> 00:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>does this become a different pen in my hand than

988
00:55:10.440 --> 00:55:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the one that I have in my hand.

989
00:55:11.840 --> 00:55:13.320
<v Speaker 3>If just the ink goes out.

990
00:55:13.639 --> 00:55:18.119
<v Speaker 5>It still is a pen. It's still can uh, it

991
00:55:18.199 --> 00:55:20.840
<v Speaker 5>still has ink and you can still right with it,

992
00:55:20.880 --> 00:55:22.400
<v Speaker 5>and it still the pen.

993
00:55:22.559 --> 00:55:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but you're saying it's not still the pen when

994
00:55:26.199 --> 00:55:29.719
<v Speaker 1>ink comes out of it.

995
00:55:29.719 --> 00:55:35.639
<v Speaker 5>It has changed. It has lost some atoms, so I

996
00:55:37.119 --> 00:55:41.280
<v Speaker 5>so it's not exactly the same. It is largely the same.

997
00:55:41.320 --> 00:55:42.559
<v Speaker 6>It's mostly the same.

998
00:55:43.159 --> 00:55:50.239
<v Speaker 5>But but it's not. I'm not they're not equal. They aren't.

999
00:55:50.800 --> 00:55:53.440
<v Speaker 5>They're approximately equal, but they're not equal.

1000
00:55:54.000 --> 00:55:57.119
<v Speaker 1>We're still talking about the pen, right, Yes, we're still

1001
00:55:57.159 --> 00:55:58.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about.

1002
00:55:57.760 --> 00:56:00.880
<v Speaker 3>The physical object at some of its atoms.

1003
00:56:00.880 --> 00:56:03.159
<v Speaker 5>So it's not exactly the same physical object.

1004
00:56:03.320 --> 00:56:08.800
<v Speaker 1>It's how is it not the same physical object.

1005
00:56:08.119 --> 00:56:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Because it lost some of its matter, it changed, It's

1006
00:56:12.280 --> 00:56:14.039
<v Speaker 5>not all of the atoms are in the same place

1007
00:56:14.119 --> 00:56:14.639
<v Speaker 5>that it was.

1008
00:56:16.079 --> 00:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, doesn't mean it's a different pen.

1009
00:56:21.320 --> 00:56:23.440
<v Speaker 5>The pen from before became that pen.

1010
00:56:23.920 --> 00:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I agree, doesn't mean it's a different pen, and that's

1011
00:56:26.480 --> 00:56:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what you've got. That's what you're trying to prove right now.

1012
00:56:28.320 --> 00:56:32.079
<v Speaker 1>And you can't really do that with this, right because

1013
00:56:32.079 --> 00:56:34.239
<v Speaker 1>there are some properties of things that can change. And

1014
00:56:34.239 --> 00:56:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that the thing has stopped being the thing.

1015
00:56:37.119 --> 00:56:39.760
<v Speaker 5>No, you still have the conception of it as being

1016
00:56:39.800 --> 00:56:43.440
<v Speaker 5>the pen. But that conception that abstraction is fundamental.

1017
00:56:44.199 --> 00:56:46.719
<v Speaker 1>You haven't proven that the pen becomes a different pen

1018
00:56:47.000 --> 00:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>just because some of its properties change, especially properties that

1019
00:56:50.400 --> 00:56:55.679
<v Speaker 1>are designed to change. Right anyway, this is just we're

1020
00:56:55.719 --> 00:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>going over the same ground. Please, God, you some more

1021
00:56:59.440 --> 00:57:01.239
<v Speaker 1>study of flow so we try and get your first

1022
00:57:01.239 --> 00:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>promise at least makes sense.

1023
00:57:04.119 --> 00:57:08.559
<v Speaker 3>It would be nice. This has been a little bit

1024
00:57:08.599 --> 00:57:09.960
<v Speaker 3>of fun, all right.

1025
00:57:13.119 --> 00:57:16.119
<v Speaker 2>I think there was just a fundamental problem with communication there.

1026
00:57:16.599 --> 00:57:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1027
00:57:16.880 --> 00:57:19.039
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to do the Ship of Thesius. We

1028
00:57:19.159 --> 00:57:21.679
<v Speaker 1>ended up doing it anyway, Although I think the ship

1029
00:57:21.719 --> 00:57:24.519
<v Speaker 1>of Theseus is slightly different because that's replacing every part.

1030
00:57:26.760 --> 00:57:30.039
<v Speaker 3>Is it still the same ship? And the answer is this,

1031
00:57:30.639 --> 00:57:32.760
<v Speaker 3>we actually have a real ship like that right now?

1032
00:57:33.199 --> 00:57:37.119
<v Speaker 3>M uss constitution, Yeah.

1033
00:57:37.480 --> 00:57:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, some properties are are are supposed to change. Does

1034
00:57:43.000 --> 00:57:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it mean it' stop being a thing. I think the

1035
00:57:45.000 --> 00:57:49.639
<v Speaker 1>more fun one than theis is the statue. Bronze statue, David,

1036
00:57:49.719 --> 00:57:52.440
<v Speaker 1>when you melt the statue down, I go from that.

1037
00:57:52.599 --> 00:57:54.639
<v Speaker 3>I think that that that is still a equals a.

1038
00:57:55.360 --> 00:57:59.119
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that we are describing the same blob

1039
00:57:59.320 --> 00:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of bronze in.

1040
00:58:01.599 --> 00:58:08.079
<v Speaker 8>Just two different states, two different that's the And if

1041
00:58:08.079 --> 00:58:10.920
<v Speaker 8>you had more bronze, you still have it. Blaba bronze,

1042
00:58:12.199 --> 00:58:17.119
<v Speaker 8>take less, you still have. Size can change. It's veryable anyway,

1043
00:58:17.400 --> 00:58:18.159
<v Speaker 8>life gus On.

1044
00:58:18.760 --> 00:58:21.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, did we do all of our announcements? I don't remember.

1045
00:58:21.360 --> 00:58:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we do have announcements. I have not done any

1046
00:58:23.280 --> 00:58:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of those.

1047
00:58:23.719 --> 00:58:26.039
<v Speaker 3>I honestly didn't remember. I'm not trying to remind you.

1048
00:58:26.079 --> 00:58:31.519
<v Speaker 3>I completely forgot. I'm on my shirt show today, so

1049
00:58:31.599 --> 00:58:34.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of lost. I would like to do that.

1050
00:58:34.840 --> 00:58:37.159
<v Speaker 3>I've done three shows a day before. That's always fun.

1051
00:58:37.639 --> 00:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, turns your brain damash, but you can do it

1052
00:58:40.880 --> 00:58:41.360
<v Speaker 1>all right.

1053
00:58:41.559 --> 00:58:42.559
<v Speaker 3>So some announcements.

1054
00:58:42.760 --> 00:58:45.280
<v Speaker 1>We're excited to announce the launch of our twenty twenty

1055
00:58:45.280 --> 00:58:50.280
<v Speaker 1>six back crews August fifteenth at seven pm next weekend.

1056
00:58:50.599 --> 00:58:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Tickets are on sale now and yeah, they are going fast.

1057
00:58:54.400 --> 00:58:58.039
<v Speaker 1>Get yours before they're all sold out. Going to be

1058
00:58:58.079 --> 00:59:00.280
<v Speaker 1>exciting events all weekend, so you don't just need to

1059
00:59:00.280 --> 00:59:01.800
<v Speaker 1>show up for the bat Cruise. You can show up

1060
00:59:01.880 --> 00:59:04.639
<v Speaker 1>on Friday where there's going to be a special guest lecture.

1061
00:59:05.320 --> 00:59:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh there's a community outing and activity during the day

1062
00:59:08.440 --> 00:59:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday, followed by our annual members town Hall and

1063
00:59:12.400 --> 00:59:16.320
<v Speaker 1>then your favorite ACA shows film live from the three

1064
00:59:16.639 --> 00:59:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Free Thought Library is about to say three Thought.

1065
00:59:19.559 --> 00:59:21.880
<v Speaker 3>It's like we've got more than three.

1066
00:59:22.960 --> 00:59:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Library on Sunday. Confirmed featured guests include genetically Modified Skeptic,

1067
00:59:30.719 --> 00:59:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the Antibot Thinker, Godless Engineer, Objectively Dan, Secular Rarity, Jamie

1068
00:59:36.599 --> 00:59:46.039
<v Speaker 1>the Blind, Limey, Christy Powell and uh Yeah, Loglin, her

1069
00:59:46.119 --> 00:59:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Veria and Kelly Laughlin. And you can get tickets at

1070
00:59:50.639 --> 00:59:54.000
<v Speaker 1>ACA dot Shows Slash Back Cruise and folks. It is

1071
00:59:54.039 --> 00:59:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a fun time. You can hang out with other atheist,

1072
00:59:56.440 --> 00:59:59.719
<v Speaker 1>lect your hair down, and just be an a theist.

1073
01:00:00.519 --> 01:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you haven't ever had the opportunity to do that,

1074
01:00:03.400 --> 01:00:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I strongly encourage you to do that as soon as

1075
01:00:06.719 --> 01:00:07.039
<v Speaker 1>you can.

1076
01:00:07.440 --> 01:00:11.639
<v Speaker 3>Either this year's back Cruise or next year's back Cruise.

1077
01:00:11.639 --> 01:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Would be really really good to do that. And you

1078
01:00:14.480 --> 01:00:16.519
<v Speaker 1>also get to hang out at the Free Thought Library

1079
01:00:17.000 --> 01:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and do some other fun stuff.

1080
01:00:18.320 --> 01:00:20.199
<v Speaker 3>And Austin is a blast.

1081
01:00:20.599 --> 01:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as so come in on Thursday and go check

1082
01:00:22.840 --> 01:00:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Austin out because Austin has a lot of fun. There's

1083
01:00:26.679 --> 01:00:29.079
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really cool stuff. It is a beautiful,

1084
01:00:29.079 --> 01:00:33.039
<v Speaker 1>beautiful city. Just don't go north or south in the

1085
01:00:33.079 --> 01:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>freeway during rush hour because you will not go north

1086
01:00:36.239 --> 01:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>or south East West is okay nor south.

1087
01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:38.480
<v Speaker 3>That's so much.

1088
01:00:41.280 --> 01:00:44.079
<v Speaker 1>And folks, there are some folks that are literally behind

1089
01:00:44.119 --> 01:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the scenes doing stuff for us that honestly, this show

1090
01:00:47.360 --> 01:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>would go much much worse without because it would require

1091
01:00:50.000 --> 01:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>me to be more of a professional than I already am.

1092
01:00:52.480 --> 01:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying I'm a professional. And that is

1093
01:00:55.239 --> 01:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the one the only the crew are video operators, audio

1094
01:00:59.760 --> 01:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>app writers, note takers, call screeners, chat moderators.

1095
01:01:03.480 --> 01:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>All those people waving at you.

1096
01:01:05.800 --> 01:01:09.239
<v Speaker 1>And their cats and their dogs or small farm animals

1097
01:01:09.800 --> 01:01:12.599
<v Speaker 1>and children in cages. I mean, I'm sorry, No, they're

1098
01:01:12.639 --> 01:01:15.199
<v Speaker 1>not in cagous They're all free ranged children.

1099
01:01:15.280 --> 01:01:16.239
<v Speaker 3>That's why they're tasty.

1100
01:01:17.920 --> 01:01:21.719
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you too can be if you want

1101
01:01:22.199 --> 01:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a crew member.

1102
01:01:23.280 --> 01:01:25.320
<v Speaker 3>You can be a guest on one of our shows.

1103
01:01:25.039 --> 01:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Or baby even somehow if you want to I don't

1104
01:01:28.400 --> 01:01:31.719
<v Speaker 1>know why you would become a host like me, like Kelly.

1105
01:01:32.639 --> 01:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And we're always looking for people interested in being a

1106
01:01:34.480 --> 01:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>part of our production. So email volunteer at atheistdashcommunity dot

1107
01:01:40.159 --> 01:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>org to get involved if you wish. And that would

1108
01:01:44.159 --> 01:01:49.559
<v Speaker 1>be really really wonderful, do it. And yes, and so

1109
01:01:49.599 --> 01:01:52.519
<v Speaker 1>we've got a private chat over here for just you know,

1110
01:01:52.679 --> 01:01:54.559
<v Speaker 1>the crew to talk to us when stuff is going on.

1111
01:01:55.079 --> 01:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And yes, you're always welcome to stuff on Gem's test.

1112
01:01:57.360 --> 01:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Please do you only walk in the bottoms? You can

1113
01:02:00.039 --> 01:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>stop on the tops. Uh. So we do have somebody

1114
01:02:06.480 --> 01:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok uh cool, cool that we would encourage to

1115
01:02:11.280 --> 01:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>step up.

1116
01:02:15.679 --> 01:02:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I know our I know, I know our A c

1117
01:02:17.920 --> 01:02:20.719
<v Speaker 2>A live room told us to go ahead and take.

1118
01:02:20.519 --> 01:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>A Yeah, we'll go ahead, and uh, next up we

1119
01:02:24.960 --> 01:02:28.360
<v Speaker 3>get a few minutes, LA get Bob in New York.

1120
01:02:28.760 --> 01:02:29.599
<v Speaker 3>We can handle it.

1121
01:02:30.239 --> 01:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>You want to discuss reasoning behind belief in Christ versus

1122
01:02:34.320 --> 01:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not believing in Christ?

1123
01:02:36.079 --> 01:02:38.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? Sure, I've been waiting for about two hours now.

1124
01:02:38.840 --> 01:02:40.960
<v Speaker 6>The other guy got about two hours, so I would

1125
01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:43.920
<v Speaker 6>like to at least my fair time of day here.

1126
01:02:44.559 --> 01:02:47.320
<v Speaker 3>But anyway you're starting out to call the wrong way,

1127
01:02:47.559 --> 01:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you right.

1128
01:02:48.320 --> 01:02:51.159
<v Speaker 6>Now, I would like to uh. I'd like to begin

1129
01:02:51.280 --> 01:02:53.920
<v Speaker 6>my uh. I'd like to begin my part with the

1130
01:02:55.440 --> 01:02:59.159
<v Speaker 6>with a little bit of scripture. Okay, So I don't care.

1131
01:02:59.320 --> 01:03:02.320
<v Speaker 6>All all things were created.

1132
01:03:01.880 --> 01:03:04.360
<v Speaker 5>Through him, and apart from him.

1133
01:03:04.599 --> 01:03:09.000
<v Speaker 6>Not one thing what was created that has been created.

1134
01:03:09.760 --> 01:03:16.159
<v Speaker 3>So I don't care. So what's gonna say anything solo.

1135
01:03:17.000 --> 01:03:20.880
<v Speaker 6>That's a philosophical point of view, but my I would

1136
01:03:21.039 --> 01:03:24.719
<v Speaker 6>like to approach it from more of a scientifical point

1137
01:03:24.760 --> 01:03:25.079
<v Speaker 6>of view.

1138
01:03:25.679 --> 01:03:31.599
<v Speaker 3>Scientifical, scientifical. Yeah, we're starting off really good here. Let's

1139
01:03:31.639 --> 01:03:33.199
<v Speaker 3>say scientifical was.

1140
01:03:33.880 --> 01:03:37.159
<v Speaker 6>No, you gave the guy about ten minutes without interrupting.

1141
01:03:37.239 --> 01:03:38.199
<v Speaker 3>No, I've just go ahead.

1142
01:03:39.039 --> 01:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, you haven't said anything interesting yet, go.

1143
01:03:41.400 --> 01:03:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Ahead, right? I was.

1144
01:03:43.119 --> 01:03:46.400
<v Speaker 6>I was prefacing my statement and then I got rudely interrupted.

1145
01:03:46.440 --> 01:03:47.760
<v Speaker 6>So I would like at least a little bit of

1146
01:03:47.880 --> 01:03:50.400
<v Speaker 6>time to make my point of view clear. Thank you.

1147
01:03:50.920 --> 01:03:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you know what, if you're going to keep complaining,

1148
01:03:52.760 --> 01:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>you're going to get just leave him alone and let

1149
01:03:54.920 --> 01:03:56.480
<v Speaker 3>him get on with it. I just I don't have

1150
01:03:56.559 --> 01:03:58.639
<v Speaker 3>this back and forth you gave.

1151
01:03:58.800 --> 01:04:01.159
<v Speaker 6>You gave the guy about two hours to watch.

1152
01:04:01.280 --> 01:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>You have ten seconds to get on with it. He

1153
01:04:03.599 --> 01:04:04.519
<v Speaker 3>had waiting.

1154
01:04:04.719 --> 01:04:09.960
<v Speaker 6>Okay, contingency contingency, I did it.

1155
01:04:10.039 --> 01:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>You're going to make an argument from contingency, Yes, sir, really.

1156
01:04:15.039 --> 01:04:18.159
<v Speaker 3>Definite cause if if nothing.

1157
01:04:17.960 --> 01:04:20.159
<v Speaker 6>Can be created, then where did it come from?

1158
01:04:20.599 --> 01:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>Indefinite?

1159
01:04:21.239 --> 01:04:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because how did God take out take nothing and

1160
01:04:24.599 --> 01:04:25.239
<v Speaker 2>make everything?

1161
01:04:25.320 --> 01:04:27.559
<v Speaker 3>How did that happen? That's the question.

1162
01:04:27.760 --> 01:04:31.199
<v Speaker 6>He's because that's a that's an amazing question.

1163
01:04:31.079 --> 01:04:32.440
<v Speaker 5>And that's the root of the matter.

1164
01:04:32.599 --> 01:04:36.039
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So, so ergy, we know that energy can't.

1165
01:04:35.880 --> 01:04:39.280
<v Speaker 6>Be doing a questions. You asked the question online.

1166
01:04:39.280 --> 01:04:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, tell us, tell us and stop fucking complaining.

1167
01:04:42.119 --> 01:04:43.559
<v Speaker 3>It's no, I'm not.

1168
01:04:43.719 --> 01:04:46.039
<v Speaker 5>But the guy before me, he got I was waiting

1169
01:04:46.079 --> 01:04:49.639
<v Speaker 5>on the line, stopping again, complaining, or we will hang out.

1170
01:04:49.920 --> 01:04:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1171
01:04:50.559 --> 01:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>We didn't want to take your call anyway. You're the

1172
01:04:52.360 --> 01:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>only caller on the line, so we.

1173
01:04:53.800 --> 01:04:59.800
<v Speaker 6>Kind of had to Everything came from something like today,

1174
01:05:00.280 --> 01:05:01.800
<v Speaker 6>from yesterday, an.

1175
01:05:01.840 --> 01:05:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Energy be created or destroyed, the contingencies and.

1176
01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Energy be created or destroyed. No, okay, everything is contingent

1177
01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>on on energy. I don't need your God, where where

1178
01:05:16.400 --> 01:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>did it come?

1179
01:05:17.039 --> 01:05:19.039
<v Speaker 6>And my question I'm talking physics.

1180
01:05:19.079 --> 01:05:20.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even getting into it.

1181
01:05:20.239 --> 01:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking physics. We're talking to law. Thermodynamics. Energy cannot

1182
01:05:23.400 --> 01:05:25.639
<v Speaker 1>be treated or destroyed. And then you ask where did

1183
01:05:25.760 --> 01:05:29.679
<v Speaker 1>energy come from? It can't be treated or destroyed. Where

1184
01:05:29.719 --> 01:05:32.239
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to claim your God didn't come from someplace,

1185
01:05:32.320 --> 01:05:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I can claim energy does. I've got better grounding, hey

1186
01:05:35.360 --> 01:05:38.079
<v Speaker 1>to say energy doesn't come from anything because the laws

1187
01:05:38.119 --> 01:05:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of physics.

1188
01:05:38.719 --> 01:05:39.199
<v Speaker 6>That's cool.

1189
01:05:39.280 --> 01:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Then you do for your god.

1190
01:05:41.239 --> 01:05:43.159
<v Speaker 6>Let's cool it for a second. I want I want

1191
01:05:43.199 --> 01:05:46.360
<v Speaker 6>to I want to slow down and unpack everything. I'm

1192
01:05:46.360 --> 01:05:47.960
<v Speaker 6>not trying to get into an argument. I want to

1193
01:05:47.960 --> 01:05:53.280
<v Speaker 6>get into a conversation. So, okay, we got that out

1194
01:05:53.320 --> 01:05:57.119
<v Speaker 6>of the way. Anyway, according to I don't know who

1195
01:05:57.239 --> 01:06:02.760
<v Speaker 6>came up with Albert Einstein, something equals mc squared or whatever.

1196
01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it's Albert Einstein. Mass comes from energy. Okay, yes,

1197
01:06:08.519 --> 01:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And this goes back to fund my first question. If

1198
01:06:11.440 --> 01:06:15.559
<v Speaker 1>energy cannot be created or destroyed, everything is contingent on energy.

1199
01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Egles MC squared proves that.

1200
01:06:18.119 --> 01:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a basic scientific.

1201
01:06:20.760 --> 01:06:24.639
<v Speaker 6>Okay, that's that's perfectly fine and great. But I'm asking

1202
01:06:25.400 --> 01:06:29.199
<v Speaker 6>where did it start in the origin, Where did it originate?

1203
01:06:30.320 --> 01:06:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Energy?

1204
01:06:30.840 --> 01:06:33.119
<v Speaker 3>It was never created, It can't be created.

1205
01:06:33.159 --> 01:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>It didn't originate from anywhere because there is no there

1206
01:06:37.880 --> 01:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>is no origin for energy.

1207
01:06:39.880 --> 01:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Energy. Is that's the whole point behind the first law

1208
01:06:42.880 --> 01:06:43.719
<v Speaker 3>throne and dynamics?

1209
01:06:44.280 --> 01:06:47.280
<v Speaker 6>Or are you saying it's eternal like it's always existed.

1210
01:06:47.440 --> 01:06:48.280
<v Speaker 3>As far as we know.

1211
01:06:48.480 --> 01:06:52.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, now this universe hasn't. There's a difference between this

1212
01:06:52.719 --> 01:06:56.119
<v Speaker 1>instantiation of the universe and energy. Right, And it also

1213
01:06:56.199 --> 01:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>depends on which version of time, whether you think it's

1214
01:06:58.480 --> 01:07:01.559
<v Speaker 1>space time or space and time, which is a whole

1215
01:07:01.599 --> 01:07:04.119
<v Speaker 1>physics thing on own we're not going to try and

1216
01:07:04.199 --> 01:07:04.639
<v Speaker 1>get into.

1217
01:07:05.199 --> 01:07:09.360
<v Speaker 6>But yes, a matter of just a matter of actual

1218
01:07:09.480 --> 01:07:13.159
<v Speaker 6>clock time, like clock time, like if I had yesterday,

1219
01:07:13.239 --> 01:07:17.719
<v Speaker 6>and then if I went back in time yesterday, yesterday, yesterday, yesterday,

1220
01:07:17.960 --> 01:07:18.920
<v Speaker 6>all the way to the beginning.

1221
01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess they say you go to the beginning of

1222
01:07:21.440 --> 01:07:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the universe. And then we get into the question of

1223
01:07:23.119 --> 01:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>whether time is eternal or not. Right, we don't know, Well, no,

1224
01:07:26.920 --> 01:07:29.199
<v Speaker 1>we don't know if it's space time the concept of

1225
01:07:29.239 --> 01:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>space and time, that time depends on space or our

1226
01:07:32.880 --> 01:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>space and time independent things in physics.

1227
01:07:35.039 --> 01:07:35.519
<v Speaker 3>We don't know.

1228
01:07:36.960 --> 01:07:40.599
<v Speaker 6>Excuse me, please, I listened about two hours of that

1229
01:07:40.719 --> 01:07:41.679
<v Speaker 6>guy wastling on.

1230
01:07:42.199 --> 01:07:44.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, this is your last warning, complain about the

1231
01:07:44.679 --> 01:07:46.639
<v Speaker 1>last guy again, and I'm just going to drop you.

1232
01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:48.519
<v Speaker 1>And not only I'm going to drop you, I'm going

1233
01:07:48.559 --> 01:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to recommend to our crew that you never come back.

1234
01:07:52.000 --> 01:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Stop complaining about the previous guy. Now answer the question

1235
01:07:56.960 --> 01:08:01.719
<v Speaker 1>equal energy. Everything is dependent on ergy. Energy cannot be created.

1236
01:08:02.320 --> 01:08:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Whether time is eternal or not is up for debate

1237
01:08:05.239 --> 01:08:06.079
<v Speaker 1>in the physics world.

1238
01:08:07.159 --> 01:08:09.239
<v Speaker 6>Sure, okay, that's fair enough.

1239
01:08:09.880 --> 01:08:11.280
<v Speaker 5>Can I please, do I have like?

1240
01:08:12.519 --> 01:08:13.719
<v Speaker 6>Do I have a response to that?

1241
01:08:15.760 --> 01:08:16.479
<v Speaker 5>Is this a lecture?

1242
01:08:17.359 --> 01:08:18.119
<v Speaker 6>Can I respond?

1243
01:08:18.920 --> 01:08:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Please? I waited about two.

1244
01:08:20.880 --> 01:08:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Hours to get on the air, so I'd like to

1245
01:08:22.560 --> 01:08:24.039
<v Speaker 6>at least a little bit of time.

1246
01:08:24.119 --> 01:08:26.800
<v Speaker 3>There you go. Now you're gonna wait forever, dude, Bob,

1247
01:08:26.880 --> 01:08:29.319
<v Speaker 3>You're gone. Wow. I hate to do that to our

1248
01:08:29.359 --> 01:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>only caller.

1249
01:08:30.640 --> 01:08:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but how many times you got to tell him though,

1250
01:08:33.640 --> 01:08:37.119
<v Speaker 2>to stop complaining? I mean yeah, I mean half of

1251
01:08:37.199 --> 01:08:38.760
<v Speaker 2>that call was him complaining.

1252
01:08:38.439 --> 01:08:39.039
<v Speaker 3>Let's face it.

1253
01:08:39.359 --> 01:08:42.760
<v Speaker 2>And honestly, when he called earlier, he was half his

1254
01:08:42.880 --> 01:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>call then was doing the same thing complaining. He was

1255
01:08:45.600 --> 01:08:47.840
<v Speaker 2>complaining that we were over talking him while he was

1256
01:08:47.920 --> 01:08:48.439
<v Speaker 2>over talking.

1257
01:08:50.640 --> 01:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is, the contingency argument is perfectly fine.

1258
01:08:56.479 --> 01:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I hate everything is contingent on energy, and we can

1259
01:08:59.159 --> 01:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in the physics show that right is time?

1260
01:09:03.239 --> 01:09:05.039
<v Speaker 3>Is it spacetime or time?

1261
01:09:05.399 --> 01:09:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Go know, there's a new quantum concept that was first

1262
01:09:09.640 --> 01:09:12.239
<v Speaker 2>thought of in twenty I talked about it to him earlier.

1263
01:09:12.920 --> 01:09:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Just recruited everything you said, just on truth wanted earlier.

1264
01:09:16.359 --> 01:09:18.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a new scientific concept that was thought about in

1265
01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:22.479
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen. It was actually proven just last year, twenty

1266
01:09:22.560 --> 01:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. It's called indefinite causal order, and we've what

1267
01:09:26.960 --> 01:09:29.079
<v Speaker 2>we found out is that the cause and effect are

1268
01:09:29.119 --> 01:09:32.560
<v Speaker 2>super positional. The effect can actually happened before the cause.

1269
01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>So that takes your whole contingency argument, throws it out

1270
01:09:35.880 --> 01:09:36.279
<v Speaker 2>the window.

1271
01:09:36.359 --> 01:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's not new, that's been around. I remember

1272
01:09:39.520 --> 01:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>reading about that in the nineties. I think I think

1273
01:09:43.880 --> 01:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it was an experiment. I want to say it was

1274
01:09:45.680 --> 01:09:49.359
<v Speaker 1>in Ohio where they shot a photon of light down

1275
01:09:50.520 --> 01:09:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a tube and then they would randomly close close one

1276
01:09:55.439 --> 01:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>side of the tube after the photon had passed the

1277
01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a point, and one percent of the time it was

1278
01:10:02.000 --> 01:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in the one that was open.

1279
01:10:06.600 --> 01:10:08.560
<v Speaker 3>If I remember that correctly, and.

1280
01:10:08.600 --> 01:10:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I may not, I'm sure somebody in chat probably has

1281
01:10:11.640 --> 01:10:13.359
<v Speaker 1>a reference to the actual paper.

1282
01:10:13.479 --> 01:10:15.279
<v Speaker 3>That would be cool. I'd like to add that to

1283
01:10:15.399 --> 01:10:19.720
<v Speaker 3>my notes on stuff. I got to keep up with science. Guys,

1284
01:10:20.279 --> 01:10:22.039
<v Speaker 3>you get your theiss with all your argument.

1285
01:10:22.079 --> 01:10:24.319
<v Speaker 2>You got to keep up with science because science keeps

1286
01:10:24.359 --> 01:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>making making those gaps that your god lives in smaller

1287
01:10:27.680 --> 01:10:28.840
<v Speaker 2>and smaller and smaller.

1288
01:10:29.840 --> 01:10:36.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So yeah, cause and effect are sometimes effective.

1289
01:10:36.720 --> 01:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Then cause once again goes back to is it space

1290
01:10:39.840 --> 01:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>time or space and time?

1291
01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:47.720
<v Speaker 3>And if you don't have time, can you have changes?

1292
01:10:48.560 --> 01:10:49.840
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of the question.

1293
01:10:51.640 --> 01:10:56.199
<v Speaker 2>Also, right then, and they were Let's say we say

1294
01:10:56.279 --> 01:10:58.359
<v Speaker 2>that Bob was right there that there has to be

1295
01:10:58.560 --> 01:11:02.239
<v Speaker 2>some cause cause that started at that doesn't prove that

1296
01:11:02.359 --> 01:11:04.079
<v Speaker 2>that is his personal god, right.

1297
01:11:04.800 --> 01:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>No, nastually have the problem with a lot of these

1298
01:11:07.199 --> 01:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is they get to Okay, you want to say the

1299
01:11:10.039 --> 01:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>contingency argument, everything is contingent on something that something has

1300
01:11:13.680 --> 01:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>got Well, okay, you make the argument everything is contingent

1301
01:11:16.640 --> 01:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on something, all right, matter is contingent on energy.

1302
01:11:19.279 --> 01:11:23.279
<v Speaker 3>I don't need to go beyond energy at all.

1303
01:11:23.920 --> 01:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Ever, I don't need a god, right, we don't need

1304
01:11:26.760 --> 01:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a god to know that one plus one equals two.

1305
01:11:29.079 --> 01:11:31.479
<v Speaker 1>We don't need a god to know that A equals a,

1306
01:11:31.960 --> 01:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>A is not equal B. You know those things we

1307
01:11:34.680 --> 01:11:40.399
<v Speaker 1>just don't need. But yeah, and any other way I

1308
01:11:40.479 --> 01:11:42.359
<v Speaker 1>like to go with contingenty ar argument is that everything

1309
01:11:42.439 --> 01:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is contingent on me, proved me wrong, and then watch

1310
01:11:45.720 --> 01:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>them flunders they can't. And the fun part about that is,

1311
01:11:49.359 --> 01:11:52.119
<v Speaker 1>remember all those things that people used to say, is

1312
01:11:52.199 --> 01:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, why didn't God answer my prayer? He did?

1313
01:11:54.720 --> 01:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's no, he works in mysterious ways, all those

1314
01:11:59.520 --> 01:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>really fun answers.

1315
01:12:01.079 --> 01:12:03.479
<v Speaker 3>I just feed it back to him. It laughs. Historically

1316
01:12:03.840 --> 01:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>it's it's great fun. Yeah. Man, the universe works in

1317
01:12:07.720 --> 01:12:08.600
<v Speaker 3>mysterious ways.

1318
01:12:08.680 --> 01:12:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Man, I don't know.

1319
01:12:10.680 --> 01:12:14.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, black holes, Yeah, they work in mysterious ways, you know.

1320
01:12:18.399 --> 01:12:23.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, and we have a color in the screating room.

1321
01:12:23.119 --> 01:12:26.279
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully they make it past. Fun.

1322
01:12:26.920 --> 01:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, don want to drop and hopefully they make it

1323
01:12:29.760 --> 01:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>past so it looks like it's an interesting uh.

1324
01:12:32.439 --> 01:12:37.159
<v Speaker 3>Oh oh, it was Bob trying to call in as

1325
01:12:37.239 --> 01:12:37.840
<v Speaker 3>somebody else.

1326
01:12:39.199 --> 01:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm really really tempted to click that band collar on Bob,

1327
01:12:44.600 --> 01:12:49.119
<v Speaker 1>but that is not my choice. Yes, yes he is.

1328
01:12:50.680 --> 01:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>The more we know, the less we need him. I

1329
01:12:53.680 --> 01:12:55.159
<v Speaker 1>always like to point out when it comes. I mean,

1330
01:12:55.159 --> 01:12:57.079
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to start trying to prove God first,

1331
01:12:57.159 --> 01:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>pro the supernatural is a thing, and over the last

1332
01:13:01.680 --> 01:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>two thousand years we've kind of proven it isn't.

1333
01:13:06.760 --> 01:13:06.840
<v Speaker 5>Now.

1334
01:13:06.920 --> 01:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand years ago, we had supernatural explanations for all

1335
01:13:09.760 --> 01:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>kinds of phenomenon. Why my ship sink beside and got

1336
01:13:12.800 --> 01:13:15.119
<v Speaker 1>angry at you and created a storm and sank your shit?

1337
01:13:15.920 --> 01:13:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Why did my cows get sick? Witch cursed you?

1338
01:13:18.439 --> 01:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>All of these supernatural things had or all these phenomena

1339
01:13:22.039 --> 01:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>had supernatural explanations.

1340
01:13:23.560 --> 01:13:26.640
<v Speaker 3>And now you know, we know what causes.

1341
01:13:26.359 --> 01:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Storms, we know how storms work, we can forecast them

1342
01:13:29.560 --> 01:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>with a fair degree of accuracy.

1343
01:13:32.840 --> 01:13:34.800
<v Speaker 3>We have the germ theory of disease. We know why

1344
01:13:34.920 --> 01:13:36.479
<v Speaker 3>cows and humans and everybody else.

1345
01:13:37.640 --> 01:13:40.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure there's no such thing as witches too,

1346
01:13:40.439 --> 01:13:42.479
<v Speaker 2>but well not you know, like ones that are casting

1347
01:13:43.239 --> 01:13:44.520
<v Speaker 2>mid level and spells on you.

1348
01:13:44.680 --> 01:13:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Right, Okay, Allison is up next. Cool, let's talk.

1349
01:13:53.039 --> 01:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>About how God would be unknowable pronouns or she her?

1350
01:13:56.079 --> 01:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like you are from moving opera. Oh Missouri,

1351
01:14:00.960 --> 01:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm sorry sorry?

1352
01:14:02.079 --> 01:14:05.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, is that Missouri?

1353
01:14:05.720 --> 01:14:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

1354
01:14:06.680 --> 01:14:10.199
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was a Meli opera back of the US.

1355
01:14:13.199 --> 01:14:16.439
<v Speaker 6>I was just calling because it seemed like there was

1356
01:14:16.479 --> 01:14:16.960
<v Speaker 6>a lack.

1357
01:14:16.880 --> 01:14:19.119
<v Speaker 7>Of college currently and I wanted to give you someone

1358
01:14:19.199 --> 01:14:20.199
<v Speaker 7>to talk to him, something to do.

1359
01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:24.880
<v Speaker 3>I would call up, Sorry, we just said awesome. I

1360
01:14:24.920 --> 01:14:25.399
<v Speaker 3>thought I would.

1361
01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:27.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I thought I would call it the claim that

1362
01:14:28.520 --> 01:14:30.840
<v Speaker 6>if there is a God.

1363
01:14:31.279 --> 01:14:34.680
<v Speaker 7>No human could ever know anything about their true intentions

1364
01:14:34.680 --> 01:14:38.239
<v Speaker 7>and motivations, because anything we would ever know about them

1365
01:14:38.560 --> 01:14:42.399
<v Speaker 7>would either be propaganda from themselves, propaganda from their allies,

1366
01:14:42.760 --> 01:14:44.720
<v Speaker 7>or propaganda from their enemies.

1367
01:14:44.760 --> 01:14:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, or made up. So how did you prove that

1368
01:14:48.119 --> 01:14:48.880
<v Speaker 3>God exists?

1369
01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:50.279
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

1370
01:14:50.399 --> 01:14:53.600
<v Speaker 6>So I for me, that's hard to answer.

1371
01:14:53.680 --> 01:14:55.000
<v Speaker 7>I don't know what it would take.

1372
01:14:54.880 --> 01:14:55.520
<v Speaker 3>To convince me.

1373
01:14:57.800 --> 01:14:58.039
<v Speaker 9>Either.

1374
01:14:59.479 --> 01:14:59.760
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

1375
01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:01.039
<v Speaker 6>I feel I could all know.

1376
01:15:01.319 --> 01:15:04.119
<v Speaker 7>God wouldn't know what it would take to convince man, right, right.

1377
01:15:04.359 --> 01:15:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I had had some parameters on one of the earlier

1378
01:15:06.960 --> 01:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>shows about what type of what type of evidence I

1379
01:15:09.560 --> 01:15:12.399
<v Speaker 2>would need, you know, But what the actual evidence is

1380
01:15:12.479 --> 01:15:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1381
01:15:13.119 --> 01:15:15.239
<v Speaker 3>But it would have to meet certain guidelines for me

1382
01:15:15.319 --> 01:15:15.920
<v Speaker 3>to accept it.

1383
01:15:17.840 --> 01:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a ton of evidence, and the time to

1384
01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:26.079
<v Speaker 1>believe something is true is when you have sufficient evidence

1385
01:15:26.159 --> 01:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to warm that belief. I just don't know that, Uh,

1386
01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:38.359
<v Speaker 1>I should you know? Until until you've got some sort

1387
01:15:38.399 --> 01:15:41.479
<v Speaker 1>of evidence. It's not you know, black swan fallacy, that

1388
01:15:41.600 --> 01:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. Uh, there's a reason to believe there

1389
01:15:43.720 --> 01:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>are black swans until you find one.

1390
01:15:45.319 --> 01:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>And we found one. Oh, look there are black swans,

1391
01:15:49.199 --> 01:15:49.359
<v Speaker 3>you know.

1392
01:15:49.840 --> 01:15:55.119
<v Speaker 7>Uh, But that's sort of my pot this too, is

1393
01:15:55.159 --> 01:15:58.199
<v Speaker 7>the idea that it's already a big enough.

1394
01:15:58.079 --> 01:16:01.119
<v Speaker 6>Thing to say there is a guy God. But I

1395
01:16:01.199 --> 01:16:03.920
<v Speaker 6>think it's a more radicter paying to pay.

1396
01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:07.439
<v Speaker 7>You understand the nature of that God when all you

1397
01:16:07.439 --> 01:16:11.199
<v Speaker 7>would ever have is we science that I could never

1398
01:16:11.279 --> 01:16:15.359
<v Speaker 7>study a god. It's not possible, So to pay you

1399
01:16:15.399 --> 01:16:18.439
<v Speaker 7>know the nature of something, it would be simply based

1400
01:16:18.600 --> 01:16:22.880
<v Speaker 7>on propaganda, either by them, their allies or their enemies.

1401
01:16:23.319 --> 01:16:25.159
<v Speaker 6>And so I don't think propaganda is never a.

1402
01:16:25.199 --> 01:16:26.279
<v Speaker 7>Good way to know nature.

1403
01:16:27.079 --> 01:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not a good way to know anything. It's

1404
01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>from propaganda, right, Everything is putting a spin on us.

1405
01:16:32.640 --> 01:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And the best way to know something physical is to

1406
01:16:34.960 --> 01:16:42.319
<v Speaker 1>measure it, right, absolutely, Yeah, So God would have to

1407
01:16:42.359 --> 01:16:43.439
<v Speaker 1>be something we can measure.

1408
01:16:43.520 --> 01:16:43.840
<v Speaker 7>Hemans.

1409
01:16:44.600 --> 01:16:46.840
<v Speaker 3>God would have to be something we can measure physically.

1410
01:16:48.399 --> 01:16:50.840
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of what I was saying. I want empirical evidence,

1411
01:16:50.960 --> 01:16:54.079
<v Speaker 3>right on ambiguous empirical evidence.

1412
01:16:54.680 --> 01:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>When you say the word existence you are implying properties

1413
01:16:57.920 --> 01:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that can be measured.

1414
01:16:59.119 --> 01:17:01.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you cannot.

1415
01:17:02.600 --> 01:17:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Even like one plus one equals two being true, exit

1416
01:17:08.600 --> 01:17:13.199
<v Speaker 1>that formula exists. It has properties we can measure, right,

1417
01:17:13.520 --> 01:17:17.239
<v Speaker 1>it has an operator to operands and an answer. Those

1418
01:17:17.279 --> 01:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>are all those are all properties of the equations.

1419
01:17:19.960 --> 01:17:23.680
<v Speaker 5>So absolutely, and I get what you're.

1420
01:17:23.520 --> 01:17:27.760
<v Speaker 6>Saying, Yeah, is that true God to exist, they would

1421
01:17:27.800 --> 01:17:28.760
<v Speaker 6>have to exist.

1422
01:17:28.520 --> 01:17:32.000
<v Speaker 7>Within the rules of our universe because they exist within

1423
01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:32.640
<v Speaker 7>our universe?

1424
01:17:33.319 --> 01:17:34.159
<v Speaker 6>Is that kind of what you're saying.

1425
01:17:34.159 --> 01:17:36.119
<v Speaker 7>They would have to It would interact with that universe

1426
01:17:36.159 --> 01:17:37.279
<v Speaker 7>the way everything else does.

1427
01:17:37.800 --> 01:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, it would have to inter I mean, well, first

1428
01:17:40.800 --> 01:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to figure out that if outside of the

1429
01:17:42.880 --> 01:17:46.079
<v Speaker 1>universe even has any kind of meaning. And as far

1430
01:17:46.159 --> 01:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>as I'm aware, physics is kind of up and air

1431
01:17:49.279 --> 01:17:53.279
<v Speaker 1>on that one. There isn't There's a whole lot of hypotheses,

1432
01:17:53.359 --> 01:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but there isn't a whole lot of of theory on that.

1433
01:17:57.359 --> 01:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's a problem. I mean, that's kind of the

1434
01:18:01.600 --> 01:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>first thing you could have to do. The second thing

1435
01:18:03.840 --> 01:18:07.079
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to do is demonstrate how something outside of

1436
01:18:07.159 --> 01:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>the universe can affect something inside the universe. You still

1437
01:18:12.199 --> 01:18:15.199
<v Speaker 1>have to prove how they or how they created the universe.

1438
01:18:15.760 --> 01:18:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1439
01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a problem with the teleological argument is there's

1440
01:18:18.520 --> 01:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>only two ways to prove that. To prove it to

1441
01:18:22.680 --> 01:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the logical argument, one is to show the creator and

1442
01:18:26.000 --> 01:18:29.079
<v Speaker 1>two to compare the thing to something that is known

1443
01:18:29.159 --> 01:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>to be created or natural. And we only have what

1444
01:18:33.319 --> 01:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>We only have this universe, and we don't even know

1445
01:18:35.920 --> 01:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>if the concept of another universe makes sense. There's the

1446
01:18:40.840 --> 01:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>multi universe theory and hypothesis and all that, but right,

1447
01:18:44.840 --> 01:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we're still working on it. So our physicists are still

1448
01:18:48.039 --> 01:18:50.199
<v Speaker 1>working on It's a mathematical concept that math can be

1449
01:18:50.319 --> 01:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>wrong if we don't have you know, math models, what

1450
01:18:52.960 --> 01:18:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we know, what we know may not be correct or

1451
01:18:55.720 --> 01:18:59.039
<v Speaker 1>And that's why they built the large the l h

1452
01:18:59.079 --> 01:19:01.279
<v Speaker 1>a large Hadron Collie is to prove that the math

1453
01:19:01.560 --> 01:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>proving the Higgs Boston existed, that the math was correct.

1454
01:19:04.760 --> 01:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>They were hoping, I think that the math was wrong

1455
01:19:07.640 --> 01:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>and that there would be no Higgs Boston or it

1456
01:19:09.239 --> 01:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>would not be what they thought it was or what

1457
01:19:11.479 --> 01:19:12.279
<v Speaker 1>the math showed it to be.

1458
01:19:12.359 --> 01:19:14.199
<v Speaker 3>But they proved the math, right. This is why you've

1459
01:19:14.239 --> 01:19:15.439
<v Speaker 3>got to prove your math right.

1460
01:19:16.720 --> 01:19:23.439
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I just think it's science, but I would just

1461
01:19:23.439 --> 01:19:25.399
<v Speaker 9>saying from my understanding that was I like.

1462
01:19:25.439 --> 01:19:27.319
<v Speaker 6>How you would, because that was a big part of it.

1463
01:19:27.680 --> 01:19:32.920
<v Speaker 7>Was they did all Chadron glider to prove something wrong

1464
01:19:33.199 --> 01:19:34.920
<v Speaker 7>and ended up proving it right. And it's not like

1465
01:19:34.920 --> 01:19:36.880
<v Speaker 7>the way you worded that to they were hoping to

1466
01:19:36.920 --> 01:19:37.199
<v Speaker 7>prove it.

1467
01:19:37.239 --> 01:19:39.600
<v Speaker 9>Wrong, because from honestly, that's what science is. You never

1468
01:19:39.680 --> 01:19:42.000
<v Speaker 9>want to prove anything correct, use some detail to prove

1469
01:19:42.079 --> 01:19:42.399
<v Speaker 9>it wrong.

1470
01:19:43.479 --> 01:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, if they proved it wrong, I think the thought

1471
01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:49.239
<v Speaker 1>was that they would have more interesting physics to work on.

1472
01:19:51.239 --> 01:19:52.960
<v Speaker 3>And they would have things to go explore.

1473
01:19:53.039 --> 01:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But they proved it right, so there's a whole avenue

1474
01:19:54.920 --> 01:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that doesn't need to be explored now because

1475
01:19:57.359 --> 01:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>well the math was right, so our models, so that

1476
01:19:59.640 --> 01:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>our are right.

1477
01:20:02.520 --> 01:20:04.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, now we got to go find something else

1478
01:20:04.680 --> 01:20:05.560
<v Speaker 3>to work on, damn it.

1479
01:20:06.640 --> 01:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, or yeah, because I think they were hoping

1480
01:20:09.680 --> 01:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>for some answer because on string theory and some other stuff,

1481
01:20:13.119 --> 01:20:15.319
<v Speaker 1>if they had proven Higgs boson wrong or some other stuff,

1482
01:20:15.319 --> 01:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that would have become more probable.

1483
01:20:17.279 --> 01:20:19.520
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, okay, I.

1484
01:20:19.560 --> 01:20:22.439
<v Speaker 9>Don't actually know much about anything.

1485
01:20:23.199 --> 01:20:25.960
<v Speaker 7>I I'm a high school dropout. I got heavily bodied

1486
01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:26.319
<v Speaker 7>in school.

1487
01:20:26.359 --> 01:20:27.000
<v Speaker 5>I dropped out.

1488
01:20:27.239 --> 01:20:29.279
<v Speaker 7>I really wanted to graduates. I went back out heavily

1489
01:20:29.319 --> 01:20:32.840
<v Speaker 7>bodied again, dropped out again. But I love information, so

1490
01:20:32.920 --> 01:20:35.359
<v Speaker 7>I frequently just going through the scholar and read about

1491
01:20:35.359 --> 01:20:38.359
<v Speaker 7>topics that interested me. I thought, I know some stuff

1492
01:20:38.359 --> 01:20:40.600
<v Speaker 7>about some stuff, but I have massive gaps in my

1493
01:20:40.680 --> 01:20:45.720
<v Speaker 7>knowledge everywhere. But I enjoy the concepts of like physics

1494
01:20:45.760 --> 01:20:48.760
<v Speaker 7>and stuff I really like enjoy the Do either of

1495
01:20:48.800 --> 01:20:50.000
<v Speaker 7>you have any background in physics?

1496
01:20:50.880 --> 01:20:55.239
<v Speaker 3>I am, like you a dilettante, little tiny bit. I'm

1497
01:20:55.279 --> 01:20:57.119
<v Speaker 3>a geologist, so I have a little bit.

1498
01:20:57.399 --> 01:21:01.439
<v Speaker 7>Okay, I know that I think you right what a

1499
01:21:01.520 --> 01:21:02.359
<v Speaker 7>lawyer cut him?

1500
01:21:03.439 --> 01:21:04.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm a engineer.

1501
01:21:04.960 --> 01:21:07.239
<v Speaker 5>Oh, I'm antually mean to him with someone else, I

1502
01:21:07.319 --> 01:21:08.199
<v Speaker 5>think someone what a.

1503
01:21:08.199 --> 01:21:09.920
<v Speaker 7>Host is or was a lawyer at one point.

1504
01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Johnny is uh Johnny plays a lawyer on the

1505
01:21:17.800 --> 01:21:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube.

1506
01:21:18.800 --> 01:21:19.439
<v Speaker 3>I will say that.

1507
01:21:21.800 --> 01:21:23.159
<v Speaker 6>I was going to say, be.

1508
01:21:23.239 --> 01:21:25.319
<v Speaker 7>Sucked out a lot because I tell you a lawyer

1509
01:21:25.439 --> 01:21:25.920
<v Speaker 7>on role.

1510
01:21:25.880 --> 01:21:29.199
<v Speaker 6>Play on five M roll play it just role playing

1511
01:21:29.199 --> 01:21:29.560
<v Speaker 6>a lawyer.

1512
01:21:30.039 --> 01:21:31.279
<v Speaker 5>How much work it actually is?

1513
01:21:32.840 --> 01:21:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Cross examiner too is a lawyer? Yeah yeah, basically just

1514
01:21:37.039 --> 01:21:38.199
<v Speaker 3>taking apart someone's argument.

1515
01:21:40.439 --> 01:21:44.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah no, But I honestly called because it was downtime

1516
01:21:44.880 --> 01:21:47.439
<v Speaker 7>and I thought, let's not have downtime, like, given.

1517
01:21:47.279 --> 01:21:50.359
<v Speaker 3>Something to talk about it, I would appreciate that.

1518
01:21:51.600 --> 01:21:53.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I feel like you agreed to my first topic

1519
01:21:53.520 --> 01:21:54.159
<v Speaker 6>and we just kind of.

1520
01:21:54.159 --> 01:21:55.680
<v Speaker 7>Agreed, and that I didn't know where to go from there.

1521
01:21:56.079 --> 01:22:01.479
<v Speaker 3>I kind of you might agree, Yeah, we got somewhere.

1522
01:22:01.800 --> 01:22:03.199
<v Speaker 3>Feel free being nowhere.

1523
01:22:03.479 --> 01:22:05.439
<v Speaker 7>I'm still talking about any topics you want to you

1524
01:22:05.680 --> 01:22:06.039
<v Speaker 7>till then.

1525
01:22:10.840 --> 01:22:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I think Bob is in chat being Bob Really okay,

1526
01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Justin doesn't give up.

1527
01:22:18.119 --> 01:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Huh Well, his handle on chat's kind of cool. Ronnie

1528
01:22:23.640 --> 01:22:27.239
<v Speaker 1>Dio is awesome or something along those lines. Ronnie Dio

1529
01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>kicks ass. I'm kind of ADEO fan. I like Dio's music.

1530
01:22:31.079 --> 01:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you're going to wind complain bit Simon, we're

1531
01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going to get rid of you. You're just encouraging us

1532
01:22:36.920 --> 01:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>to make it permanent. I'm going to be honest.

1533
01:22:39.560 --> 01:22:42.960
<v Speaker 7>I felt like in the that call, from the second

1534
01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:45.760
<v Speaker 7>they answer the phone, they sounded like the person at

1535
01:22:45.920 --> 01:22:49.399
<v Speaker 7>the like steak house who's pointing across the restaurant, like,

1536
01:22:49.960 --> 01:22:51.319
<v Speaker 7>why does the mindstick.

1537
01:22:50.880 --> 01:22:51.560
<v Speaker 3>Look like theirs?

1538
01:22:57.239 --> 01:22:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he was on for six minutes and spent four

1539
01:22:59.359 --> 01:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of it complaining. The other guy was on for over

1540
01:23:01.960 --> 01:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>an hour. And at least we were having an interesting

1541
01:23:04.039 --> 01:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation until it got repetitive.

1542
01:23:06.279 --> 01:23:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, and he wasn't complaining.

1543
01:23:08.680 --> 01:23:12.680
<v Speaker 6>So I can I ask you a question, askally, how

1544
01:23:12.720 --> 01:23:14.199
<v Speaker 6>do you What are your thoughts on ton.

1545
01:23:16.439 --> 01:23:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Depends on what the tone is.

1546
01:23:18.600 --> 01:23:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are there are there are tones that, uh,

1547
01:23:24.319 --> 01:23:28.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you have if you're angry and upset

1548
01:23:29.760 --> 01:23:34.279
<v Speaker 1>like he was, then yeah, that doesn't work so well

1549
01:23:34.319 --> 01:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to communicate information. But you know, as

1550
01:23:39.560 --> 01:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a general rule, uh, I don't think it's a good thing,

1551
01:23:44.800 --> 01:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>but there I think there are times where someone's tone

1552
01:23:47.560 --> 01:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>makes it necessary to kind of go, hey, dude, turn

1553
01:23:50.079 --> 01:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it down a little bit, thank you.

1554
01:23:53.039 --> 01:23:55.880
<v Speaker 7>I was having a conversation about tone please this morning

1555
01:23:56.000 --> 01:23:58.399
<v Speaker 7>because of the time. I didn't get this in a

1556
01:23:58.439 --> 01:24:02.199
<v Speaker 7>conversation and I was confused and I would say about

1557
01:24:02.199 --> 01:24:04.880
<v Speaker 7>it to me. But I thought was that if someone

1558
01:24:05.079 --> 01:24:07.960
<v Speaker 7>is yelling like a lunatic at me, or if they

1559
01:24:08.039 --> 01:24:10.760
<v Speaker 7>used been in this hateful ton of voice, I would

1560
01:24:10.800 --> 01:24:14.359
<v Speaker 7>not engage with them because of their town. I feel

1561
01:24:14.359 --> 01:24:15.439
<v Speaker 7>like it's my peace.

1562
01:24:16.760 --> 01:24:19.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that that that's exactly what I'm talking about.

1563
01:24:19.079 --> 01:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Now. Some people use tone policing to mean that you're

1564
01:24:22.600 --> 01:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>dismissing the argument or idea by attacking how it's expressed,

1565
01:24:27.520 --> 01:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>and that I would disagree with.

1566
01:24:29.399 --> 01:24:31.399
<v Speaker 3>Right, you attack the argument, not the person.

1567
01:24:32.600 --> 01:24:35.039
<v Speaker 1>But just because you don't like someone's tone doesn't mean

1568
01:24:35.079 --> 01:24:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to engage with the argument or them at all.

1569
01:24:38.039 --> 01:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>That is not rejecting the argument, that's not dismissing it.

1570
01:24:41.680 --> 01:24:44.279
<v Speaker 1>That's not doing anything other than dismissing the person. And

1571
01:24:44.359 --> 01:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of the difference. What are you

1572
01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>dismissing the person or the argument?

1573
01:24:48.760 --> 01:24:51.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if somebody's just going to get angry and over

1574
01:24:51.439 --> 01:24:54.199
<v Speaker 2>talk you and not have a conversation, there's no sense

1575
01:24:54.279 --> 01:24:57.039
<v Speaker 2>in trying to have a conversation. I always try to

1576
01:24:57.119 --> 01:24:59.319
<v Speaker 2>reel it back in first, but a lot of times

1577
01:24:59.520 --> 01:25:01.119
<v Speaker 2>with some you just can't do it.

1578
01:25:04.039 --> 01:25:06.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I agree with both of you a lot.

1579
01:25:06.319 --> 01:25:09.079
<v Speaker 7>And that's what sort of the conversations when he turned

1580
01:25:09.119 --> 01:25:11.720
<v Speaker 7>down to was that ton case is more of a

1581
01:25:11.840 --> 01:25:15.680
<v Speaker 7>logical fallacy than a casual thing. It's just missing an

1582
01:25:15.720 --> 01:25:18.920
<v Speaker 7>argument for a salacious reason rather than having it here

1583
01:25:18.920 --> 01:25:23.680
<v Speaker 7>an issue with the tony being spoken to around. Mm hmm, right, okay, Yeah,

1584
01:25:23.720 --> 01:25:26.399
<v Speaker 7>I was just a common how this one I was

1585
01:25:26.479 --> 01:25:33.439
<v Speaker 7>reaching for a topic. Do you don't have any other

1586
01:25:33.520 --> 01:25:34.079
<v Speaker 7>college yet?

1587
01:25:34.279 --> 01:25:38.359
<v Speaker 2>I know we're actually we're we actually hit the end

1588
01:25:38.399 --> 01:25:40.439
<v Speaker 2>of the showtime. You know, if we had college, we

1589
01:25:41.319 --> 01:25:43.279
<v Speaker 2>could stay over time if we had callers, but we

1590
01:25:43.399 --> 01:25:45.439
<v Speaker 2>don't really don't have one. We have somebody in the

1591
01:25:45.600 --> 01:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>uh in the text chat, but I'm not I'm not

1592
01:25:49.640 --> 01:25:51.000
<v Speaker 2>sure that it's not Bob again.

1593
01:25:51.159 --> 01:25:56.880
<v Speaker 3>So well, hey, thanks for calling and talking to us Alison.

1594
01:25:58.079 --> 01:25:59.439
<v Speaker 3>It was awesome. It was a great call.

1595
01:26:00.680 --> 01:26:03.359
<v Speaker 5>We will chat all.

1596
01:26:03.359 --> 01:26:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Right, I'll talk to you later.

1597
01:26:06.439 --> 01:26:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay, folks, we want to thank our back up for

1598
01:26:10.199 --> 01:26:14.640
<v Speaker 1>helping out tonight, Jamie blind blimey, there we go.

1599
01:26:15.680 --> 01:26:19.560
<v Speaker 3>You look better? No, that was here, all fair? Yeah,

1600
01:26:20.039 --> 01:26:20.479
<v Speaker 3>way better.

1601
01:26:22.159 --> 01:26:25.039
<v Speaker 4>I was just jacked into cyber space communing with the

1602
01:26:25.560 --> 01:26:28.399
<v Speaker 4>techno gods to see if I could discern some truth.

1603
01:26:29.640 --> 01:26:30.159
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't.

1604
01:26:30.920 --> 01:26:34.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was just all fur. He's nothing wrong with

1605
01:26:34.399 --> 01:26:37.159
<v Speaker 4>that man anyway. Yeah, I really feel bad for Donald.

1606
01:26:38.079 --> 01:26:39.960
<v Speaker 4>It was me that invited him to call back in,

1607
01:26:41.600 --> 01:26:45.039
<v Speaker 4>and I could just sense the frustration in his voice

1608
01:26:45.159 --> 01:26:48.159
<v Speaker 4>as he was trying to get across what was obviously

1609
01:26:48.239 --> 01:26:50.199
<v Speaker 4>in his head but didn't be able to come out

1610
01:26:50.199 --> 01:26:52.119
<v Speaker 4>of his throat. And I think it's one of those

1611
01:26:52.199 --> 01:26:55.159
<v Speaker 4>things where again I'm sure the orders would go, don't

1612
01:26:55.279 --> 01:26:57.760
<v Speaker 4>do it, don't encourage him to call again. But I

1613
01:26:57.800 --> 01:27:00.319
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't mind having another conversation with him. But he might

1614
01:27:00.399 --> 01:27:03.000
<v Speaker 4>be one of those things where it's actually a conversation

1615
01:27:03.159 --> 01:27:06.920
<v Speaker 4>better had offline in a more casual kind of space.

1616
01:27:07.560 --> 01:27:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I think the problem is going to be that he

1617
01:27:09.760 --> 01:27:13.039
<v Speaker 1>can't articulate what he's thinking because he doesn't know what

1618
01:27:13.279 --> 01:27:16.319
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking. He can't you knew something when you can

1619
01:27:16.439 --> 01:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>articulate it clearly, and he was not able to do that,

1620
01:27:19.760 --> 01:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and that is a problem for him. But until he

1621
01:27:22.920 --> 01:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>can do that that, I don't know that another conversation.

1622
01:27:25.840 --> 01:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've always wanted to talk to him, yeah,

1623
01:27:28.720 --> 01:27:31.079
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know that would be any more fruitful

1624
01:27:31.159 --> 01:27:32.079
<v Speaker 1>until he's got an idea.

1625
01:27:32.640 --> 01:27:35.520
<v Speaker 4>If he's still listening and he's on and he wants

1626
01:27:35.600 --> 01:27:39.479
<v Speaker 4>to try it again, I mean, I'd be fine. But

1627
01:27:39.680 --> 01:27:41.399
<v Speaker 4>if there is a way that we could maybe, I mean,

1628
01:27:41.479 --> 01:27:44.680
<v Speaker 4>he can always send an email to TV at atheist

1629
01:27:44.720 --> 01:27:48.960
<v Speaker 4>type and community organ and request some kind of offline

1630
01:27:49.199 --> 01:27:51.359
<v Speaker 4>chats with me at least, then I'd be happy to

1631
01:27:51.359 --> 01:27:54.279
<v Speaker 4>try and accommodate that we are a community after all,

1632
01:27:54.319 --> 01:27:59.119
<v Speaker 4>and I'm happy to engage. And if he ever came,

1633
01:27:59.279 --> 01:28:01.840
<v Speaker 4>if he ever drove like ten hours from Louisiana to

1634
01:28:01.880 --> 01:28:05.000
<v Speaker 4>Austin to come to the back cruise, then I'd be

1635
01:28:05.039 --> 01:28:07.640
<v Speaker 4>happy to do it in person over some sort of

1636
01:28:07.800 --> 01:28:12.640
<v Speaker 4>chilled beverage. That would be great. As for Bob, yeah,

1637
01:28:12.760 --> 01:28:15.680
<v Speaker 4>don't just complain, don't just bitch and moan. You would

1638
01:28:15.720 --> 01:28:17.760
<v Speaker 4>get like he had. He had all the time in

1639
01:28:17.840 --> 01:28:21.239
<v Speaker 4>the world to actually give his points and refused because

1640
01:28:21.239 --> 01:28:24.239
<v Speaker 4>he was just And I think that's the large of

1641
01:28:24.359 --> 01:28:26.720
<v Speaker 4>the Christian persecution complex. I have to feel like they're

1642
01:28:26.720 --> 01:28:27.119
<v Speaker 4>a victim.

1643
01:28:27.399 --> 01:28:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, he was claiming to be an atheist, for one,

1644
01:28:29.720 --> 01:28:31.800
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know that, you know, I don't. I

1645
01:28:31.920 --> 01:28:34.399
<v Speaker 2>think mostly as Jim said, I just don't think he

1646
01:28:34.520 --> 01:28:37.960
<v Speaker 2>fully understood. And he seemed real frustrated. And I wasn't

1647
01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:40.840
<v Speaker 2>sure if he was frustrated with us because we didn't

1648
01:28:40.920 --> 01:28:43.920
<v Speaker 2>understand them, or if he was frustrated with himself because

1649
01:28:43.920 --> 01:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't communicating so we couldn't understand him.

1650
01:28:46.600 --> 01:28:46.760
<v Speaker 6>You know.

1651
01:28:48.399 --> 01:28:52.199
<v Speaker 4>Anyway, handled as well as it could possibly have been fantastic.

1652
01:28:52.359 --> 01:28:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for being It's been a long ass day. I

1653
01:28:56.880 --> 01:28:59.319
<v Speaker 4>feel like I am. I am now one with this chair.

1654
01:29:00.560 --> 01:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to be the backup post here here appreciate it.

1655
01:29:06.680 --> 01:29:08.720
<v Speaker 3>And thanks once more to our wonderful crew.

1656
01:29:09.319 --> 01:29:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Kelly for co hosting with me and helping

1657
01:29:13.199 --> 01:29:15.239
<v Speaker 1>me to keep saying even though I'm sure his brain

1658
01:29:15.319 --> 01:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is mush after doing free shows. Like I said, I've

1659
01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>done that before, it's not fun. It is, but it

1660
01:29:22.039 --> 01:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't It is, but it isn't right. It's fun up

1661
01:29:24.560 --> 01:29:26.039
<v Speaker 1>until the end, and then you crash.

1662
01:29:26.359 --> 01:29:32.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, definitely, definitely the crash is absolutely fun.

1663
01:29:32.119 --> 01:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And to everybody who joined us in chat, thank you

1664
01:29:33.880 --> 01:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>guys so much, even those of you in chat who

1665
01:29:37.720 --> 01:29:40.479
<v Speaker 1>wanted to make arguments but not actually call in and say, Hi,

1666
01:29:41.439 --> 01:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we are a call in show.

1667
01:29:42.880 --> 01:29:45.159
<v Speaker 3>We exist for you to call in, not for you

1668
01:29:45.319 --> 01:29:46.399
<v Speaker 3>to argue.

1669
01:29:46.479 --> 01:29:49.119
<v Speaker 1>In most of ports, you're arguing about something really important,

1670
01:29:49.159 --> 01:29:50.279
<v Speaker 1>like his hot dog sandwich.

1671
01:29:51.039 --> 01:29:53.159
<v Speaker 3>You put the milk in first, of the cereal, end first.

1672
01:29:53.199 --> 01:29:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Those are important questions too. In cereal then bowl. That's

1673
01:29:58.000 --> 01:30:01.439
<v Speaker 3>the way thing. There are apparently people who do it

1674
01:30:01.520 --> 01:30:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the other way, pour it all over the counter and

1675
01:30:03.720 --> 01:30:04.880
<v Speaker 3>scrape it into the bowl.

1676
01:30:06.920 --> 01:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>That works too, all right, Thank you guys so much,

1677
01:30:10.039 --> 01:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and we will see you same BAT time, same BAT channel,

1678
01:30:14.119 --> 01:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Sundays at four thirty pm Central. Well, someone will be back,

1679
01:30:18.760 --> 01:30:20.399
<v Speaker 1>may not be me, but it'll be one of us,

1680
01:30:20.800 --> 01:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be here to take your calls and talk

1681
01:30:23.680 --> 01:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to you.

1682
01:30:25.039 --> 01:30:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Live in chat, not in chat, but live on the

1683
01:30:27.920 --> 01:30:30.000
<v Speaker 3>phone or from TikTok. I know, as we'll be watching

1684
01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:30.479
<v Speaker 3>it on TikTok.

1685
01:30:30.520 --> 01:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys so much, last time, request up, Thanks

1686
01:30:35.520 --> 01:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you next time right away.

1687
01:30:41.359 --> 01:30:42.000
<v Speaker 6>To start

1688
01:30:44.960 --> 01:31:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Stop there ready, Watch Talkie Than Live Sundays at one

1689
01:31:25.039 --> 01:31:27.760
<v Speaker 3>pm Central and call into the show at five one

1690
01:31:27.880 --> 01:31:32.079
<v Speaker 3>two nine nine one nine two four two, or connect

1691
01:31:32.159 --> 01:31:34.760
<v Speaker 3>to the show online at a C A dot show

1692
01:31:34.960 --> 01:31:35.680
<v Speaker 3>slash call
