WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.439 --> 00:00:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bedtime Astronomy. Explore the wonders of the cosmos

2
00:00:07.759 --> 00:00:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with our soothing Bedtime Astronomy podcast. Each episode offers a

3
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>gentle journey through the stars, planets, and beyond, perfect for

4
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>unwinding after a long day. Let's travel through the mysteries

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as you drift off into a peaceful

6
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>slumber under the night sky. This week in Astronomy, Martian

7
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>slopes ley cake caused by dust, Moon's uneven interior and

8
00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>evolving dark matter. Martian slope streaks likely caused by dust,

9
00:00:38.280 --> 00:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not water. A new study has challenged a long standing

10
00:00:42.320 --> 00:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that dark streaks seen on the slopes of Mars

11
00:00:45.280 --> 00:00:50.359
<v Speaker 1>may be caused by liquid water. For years, planetary scientists

12
00:00:50.359 --> 00:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>have been intrigued by these mysterious features, dark fingerlike markings

13
00:00:54.880 --> 00:01:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that appear to creep down dusty Martian cliffs and crater walls,

14
00:00:59.439 --> 00:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the first captured by NASA's Viking mission in the nineteen

15
00:01:03.600 --> 00:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>seventies and more recently observed by the Cassis camera on

16
00:01:07.280 --> 00:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>ESA's Exomar's trace gas orbiter, had been interpreted by some

17
00:01:11.120 --> 00:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>as signs of water flows, potentially even pointing to environments

18
00:01:15.319 --> 00:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>where life could exist today. However, new research from scientists

19
00:01:20.120 --> 00:01:23.519
<v Speaker 1>at Brown University and the University of Burns suggests a

20
00:01:23.560 --> 00:01:28.439
<v Speaker 1>different story. Instead of flowing water, the evidence now strongly

21
00:01:28.480 --> 00:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>points to dry avalanches of dust triggered by wind or

22
00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:36.239
<v Speaker 1>impact events. The team, led by Valentine Bickel and A.

23
00:01:36.319 --> 00:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Dumas Valentinas, used a machine learning algorithm to build the

24
00:01:40.239 --> 00:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>most comprehensive map yet of these slope streaks, analyzing more

25
00:01:44.239 --> 00:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>than eighty six thousand high resolution satellite images and cataloging

26
00:01:48.359 --> 00:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>over five hundred thousand individual streaks across the Martian surface.

27
00:01:53.480 --> 00:01:57.319
<v Speaker 1>By cross referencing this data with environmental factors like temperature,

28
00:01:57.560 --> 00:02:02.519
<v Speaker 1>wind speeds, humidity, and geoligical activity, they found no patterns

29
00:02:02.560 --> 00:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>supporting the presence of liquid or frost related processes. Instead,

30
00:02:07.879 --> 00:02:12.439
<v Speaker 1>they discovered strong associations between streak formation and dry conditions,

31
00:02:12.800 --> 00:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly areas with high wind activity and recent dust deposition.

32
00:02:18.120 --> 00:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Some streaks were found to be more common near recent

33
00:02:20.919 --> 00:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>impact craters, where shock waves may loosen surface dust, while

34
00:02:25.159 --> 00:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>others appeared in regions prone to dust devils or rock falls.

35
00:02:29.560 --> 00:02:33.159
<v Speaker 1>The researchers concluded that these features are most likely formed

36
00:02:33.199 --> 00:02:36.719
<v Speaker 1>when fine layers of dust suddenly slide down steep slopes,

37
00:02:37.039 --> 00:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>creating the dark temporary markings seen from orbit. These streaks,

38
00:02:42.280 --> 00:02:45.319
<v Speaker 1>some of which last for years while others fade more quickly,

39
00:02:45.560 --> 00:02:49.159
<v Speaker 1>are likely part of ongoing dry geological processes that may

40
00:02:49.240 --> 00:02:53.039
<v Speaker 1>transport millions of tons of dust every year, possibly playing

41
00:02:53.080 --> 00:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>an important role in mars climate system. Importantly, this new

42
00:02:57.759 --> 00:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>understanding diminishes the likelihood that theseus the streaks mark currently

43
00:03:01.439 --> 00:03:06.319
<v Speaker 1>habitable environments, easing concerns about contaminating sensitive sites with Earth

44
00:03:06.400 --> 00:03:11.319
<v Speaker 1>microbes brought by future missions. This also underscores the usefulness

45
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of big data and machine learning in planetary science, allowing

46
00:03:15.159 --> 00:03:19.159
<v Speaker 1>researchers to eliminate some hypotheses without the need for immediate

47
00:03:19.199 --> 00:03:24.199
<v Speaker 1>on site exploration. Ultimately, while the dream of discovering present

48
00:03:24.280 --> 00:03:28.439
<v Speaker 1>day Martian water remains compelling, this study significantly shifts the

49
00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>focus toward understanding Mars as a planet shaped more by

50
00:03:31.879 --> 00:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>wind and dust than by water. Moon's uneven interior explains

51
00:03:36.800 --> 00:03:42.199
<v Speaker 1>nearside farside differences. The Moon's two faces, The familiar nearside

52
00:03:42.240 --> 00:03:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that always faces Earth and the more mysterious pharcide, have

53
00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:50.039
<v Speaker 1>long puzzled scientists with their stark differences in appearance and composition.

54
00:03:51.080 --> 00:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>The near side is darker, smoother, and marked by vast

55
00:03:54.479 --> 00:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>plains of ancient solidified lava, while the far side is

56
00:03:57.879 --> 00:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>more rugged, heavily cratered, and and lacking in those widespread

57
00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:07.159
<v Speaker 1>volcanic features. For decades, researchers have suspected that these visible

58
00:04:07.199 --> 00:04:10.919
<v Speaker 1>contrasts might be due to differences deep within the Moon's interior,

59
00:04:11.199 --> 00:04:16.079
<v Speaker 1>but direct evidence has been elusive. Now, using precise data

60
00:04:16.120 --> 00:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>from NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory Mission, or GRAIL,

61
00:04:20.680 --> 00:04:24.639
<v Speaker 1>which involved two spacecraft named EBB and Flow, scientists have

62
00:04:24.680 --> 00:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>made a compelling discovery that may explain the mystery. They

63
00:04:28.879 --> 00:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>detected a subtle but significant difference in the way the

64
00:04:31.680 --> 00:04:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Moon's mantle, the layer beneath the crust, responds to stress

65
00:04:35.480 --> 00:04:39.639
<v Speaker 1>on each hemisphere. Specifically, they found that the mantle on

66
00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the near side is two to three percent more deformable

67
00:04:42.439 --> 00:04:45.399
<v Speaker 1>than on the far side, suggesting it is also warmer

68
00:04:45.480 --> 00:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>by as much as one hundred and seventy degrees celsius.

69
00:04:49.639 --> 00:04:53.199
<v Speaker 1>This difference in deformability was derived from careful measurements of

70
00:04:53.240 --> 00:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>the Moon's gravitational field as it responds to tidal forces

71
00:04:56.839 --> 00:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from Earth, allowing researchers to peer into the Moon's inner

72
00:05:00.199 --> 00:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>structure without needing to physically land on its surface. The team,

73
00:05:05.120 --> 00:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>led by Ryan Park developed models of the Moon's interior

74
00:05:08.680 --> 00:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and showed that the observed differences could be explained by

75
00:05:11.800 --> 00:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a thermal imbalance between the two sides. According to their analysis,

76
00:05:16.920 --> 00:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this heat difference could stem from the presence of radioactive

77
00:05:20.040 --> 00:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>elements like thorium and titanium concentrated in the nearside mantle.

78
00:05:25.199 --> 00:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>These elements generate heat as they decay and may have

79
00:05:28.360 --> 00:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>kept the nearside warmer over billions of years. This lingering

80
00:05:32.839 --> 00:05:35.759
<v Speaker 1>warmth could be a leftover effect from the same internal

81
00:05:35.800 --> 00:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>processes that fueled extensive volcanic activity on the near side

82
00:05:39.639 --> 00:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>between three and four billion years ago, while the cooler

83
00:05:43.079 --> 00:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>farcide remained less geologically active. The findings, published in the

84
00:05:48.519 --> 00:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>journal Nature offer strong support for the theory that the

85
00:05:51.720 --> 00:05:55.519
<v Speaker 1>Moon's asymmetric surface features are the result of uneven heating

86
00:05:55.560 --> 00:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in internal composition, rather than external factors alone. Importantly, the

87
00:06:01.439 --> 00:06:05.879
<v Speaker 1>method used in this research, measuring subll gravitational shifts from orbit,

88
00:06:06.120 --> 00:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>can be applied to study the interiors of other celestial

89
00:06:09.240 --> 00:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>bodies as well, including Mars and the moons of the

90
00:06:12.199 --> 00:06:16.439
<v Speaker 1>outer planets like Enceladus and Ganymede. Since it does not

91
00:06:16.480 --> 00:06:20.079
<v Speaker 1>require landing a spacecraft, it presents a powerful tool for

92
00:06:20.120 --> 00:06:23.639
<v Speaker 1>probing the hidden interiors of distant worlds and understanding how

93
00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>their internal dynamic shape what we see on the surface.

94
00:06:27.680 --> 00:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Evolving dark matter may help solve the Hubble tension, a

95
00:06:31.920 --> 00:06:35.959
<v Speaker 1>persistent mystery continues to challenge our understanding of the cosmos,

96
00:06:36.199 --> 00:06:39.639
<v Speaker 1>lurking right at the center of the standard cosmological model.

97
00:06:40.680 --> 00:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>While all current observations confirm the idea that the universe

98
00:06:44.240 --> 00:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is expanding, a puzzling inconsistency has emerged between measurements of

99
00:06:48.600 --> 00:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>that expansion in the early Universe compared to more recent

100
00:06:52.120 --> 00:06:56.439
<v Speaker 1>local measurements. The rate of acceleration derived from the early

101
00:06:56.560 --> 00:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>universe appears to be slower than what we see closer

102
00:06:59.519 --> 00:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to the press. This discrepancy, known as the Hubble tension problem,

103
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>remains unresolved despite numerous efforts to explain it. Over the years.

104
00:07:10.439 --> 00:07:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Scientists have floated a wide variety of ideas to address

105
00:07:13.879 --> 00:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the issue. Some suggest that Einstein's theory of general relativity

106
00:07:18.759 --> 00:07:23.519
<v Speaker 1>might need revision. Others wonder whether dark matter truly exists

107
00:07:23.879 --> 00:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>or whether time itself might not tick at a uniform

108
00:07:26.680 --> 00:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>pace throughout the cosmos. There are even speculations that the

109
00:07:31.120 --> 00:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>entire universe might be rotating in some subtle way. Now,

110
00:07:35.800 --> 00:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a new idea enters the fray. What if dark matter

111
00:07:38.600 --> 00:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>itself changes over time While evolving Dark energy has been

112
00:07:43.079 --> 00:07:46.319
<v Speaker 1>studied in some detail, the idea that dark matter could

113
00:07:46.319 --> 00:07:51.839
<v Speaker 1>evolve hasn't attracted much attention. That's largely because current observations

114
00:07:51.879 --> 00:07:55.639
<v Speaker 1>support the existence of a stable, non interacting form of matter,

115
00:07:55.920 --> 00:07:59.439
<v Speaker 1>dark matter that influences the cosmos through its gravity but

116
00:07:59.480 --> 00:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>does not or absorb light. Though we haven't directly detected

117
00:08:04.120 --> 00:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>dark matter particles, the gravitational effects they produce match observations

118
00:08:08.720 --> 00:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of galaxies and large scale cosmic structure quite well. Most

119
00:08:13.720 --> 00:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>researchers skeptical of dark matter's role prefer to to scard

120
00:08:17.199 --> 00:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it altogether in favor of alternative explanations like modified gravity,

121
00:08:21.879 --> 00:08:26.079
<v Speaker 1>rather than trying to tweak its properties. However, the new

122
00:08:26.120 --> 00:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>proposal suggests that, instead of being completely stable, a portion

123
00:08:30.279 --> 00:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of dark matter could change over time. The researchers explored

124
00:08:34.679 --> 00:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a model where both dark energy and dark matter might evolve,

125
00:08:38.279 --> 00:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>but found that varying dark matter alone offered a much

126
00:08:41.360 --> 00:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>better match to the data. Their work is built on

127
00:08:44.799 --> 00:08:47.519
<v Speaker 1>the idea that what we observe in the universe, how

128
00:08:47.519 --> 00:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it expands and evolves, depends on the balance between energy

129
00:08:51.360 --> 00:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and matter. If dark energy is held constant but dark

130
00:08:55.480 --> 00:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>matter is allowed to evolve, the effects can resemble those

131
00:08:58.720 --> 00:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>produced by a model within constant dark matter and evolving

132
00:09:02.080 --> 00:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>dark energy. They proposed a form of dark matter with

133
00:09:06.039 --> 00:09:10.039
<v Speaker 1>a changing equation of state, essentially, its behavior in relation

134
00:09:10.159 --> 00:09:14.039
<v Speaker 1>to pressure and energy density shifts over time. To be

135
00:09:14.159 --> 00:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>consistent with observations, this equation of state would need to oscillate.

136
00:09:19.360 --> 00:09:25.159
<v Speaker 1>While this might sound speculative, it isn't entirely unprecedented. Neutrinos,

137
00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, have mass, don't interact strongly with light, and

138
00:09:29.559 --> 00:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are a form of hot dark matter. They also exhibit

139
00:09:33.279 --> 00:09:37.759
<v Speaker 1>oscillating properties in terms of mass. If cold dark matter

140
00:09:37.840 --> 00:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>particles had a similar oscillating behavior, it could account for

141
00:09:41.360 --> 00:09:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the observational mismatch. The model that best fits the data,

142
00:09:45.919 --> 00:09:49.639
<v Speaker 1>according to the researchers, is one where about fifteen percent

143
00:09:49.679 --> 00:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of cold dark matter behaves in this oscillatory way, while

144
00:09:53.240 --> 00:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the remaining eighty five percent remains standard and stable. This

145
00:09:57.960 --> 00:10:01.159
<v Speaker 1>hybrid model would help reconcile the day difference between early

146
00:10:01.240 --> 00:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and late measurements of the universe's expansion rate without undermining

147
00:10:04.840 --> 00:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>our current understanding of how dark matter behaves on large scales.

148
00:10:09.799 --> 00:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It's important to recognize that the proposed model is still

149
00:10:12.919 --> 00:10:15.279
<v Speaker 1>in the realm of theory, a toy model meant to

150
00:10:15.360 --> 00:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>explore possibilities rather than provide final answers. The researchers themselves

151
00:10:21.039 --> 00:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that their approach is broad and doesn't pinpoint specific

152
00:10:24.720 --> 00:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>physical characteristics or particle candidates for this oscillating dark matter.

153
00:10:30.200 --> 00:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Even so, their work opens up new avenues for thinking

154
00:10:33.360 --> 00:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about one of cosmology's biggest challenges. It expands the landscape

155
00:10:38.399 --> 00:10:41.919
<v Speaker 1>of theoretical models and suggests that the concept of evolving

156
00:10:42.000 --> 00:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>dark matter may be more than just a fringe idea.

157
00:10:45.799 --> 00:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>In the ongoing effort to solve the Hubble tension. This

158
00:10:48.679 --> 00:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>line of inquiry could be one more step toward understanding

159
00:10:52.039 --> 00:12:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the deeper mechanism shaping our universe. Seemed a