WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.399 --> 00:00:15.919
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Why we do what we do? Welcome

2
00:00:15.960 --> 00:00:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to Why we do what we do. I am your

3
00:00:19.320 --> 00:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Analyzing Behavior Functions host Abraham.

4
00:00:23.120 --> 00:00:25.679
<v Speaker 2>And I'm your Rearranged Conditions host Shane.

5
00:00:26.079 --> 00:00:28.879
<v Speaker 1>We are a psychology podcast or talk about the things

6
00:00:28.879 --> 00:00:33.399
<v Speaker 1>that humans and non human animals do, and today we're

7
00:00:33.439 --> 00:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>digging in hardcore to the behavior analysis side of things. So,

8
00:00:38.359 --> 00:00:40.799
<v Speaker 1>uh huh, what a treat for everybody?

9
00:00:40.960 --> 00:00:43.159
<v Speaker 2>Really really in the analysis part of it.

10
00:00:43.600 --> 00:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, going deep, going deep on that. If you're

11
00:00:47.439 --> 00:00:49.719
<v Speaker 1>joining us for the first time, then welcome. I hope

12
00:00:49.719 --> 00:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that you enjoy what you hear in this discussion. And

13
00:00:51.960 --> 00:00:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you're probably maybe selected this because you are also a

14
00:00:55.719 --> 00:00:58.159
<v Speaker 1>behavior analyst and you saw the title and we're like, okay,

15
00:00:58.520 --> 00:01:01.759
<v Speaker 1>finally something I can get up with. And if not,

16
00:01:02.359 --> 00:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>then I still hope you enjoy us in here. I

17
00:01:03.920 --> 00:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>do try to specifically explain these things with little jargon

18
00:01:06.680 --> 00:01:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of explanations, so and when we do

19
00:01:09.319 --> 00:01:11.599
<v Speaker 1>introduce jargon, it's because we're going to use those terms

20
00:01:11.680 --> 00:01:13.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot and do try to define those so like,

21
00:01:14.480 --> 00:01:16.799
<v Speaker 1>this should be very accessible to anybody, and I actually

22
00:01:16.879 --> 00:01:19.799
<v Speaker 1>think we'll be very illustrative and eliminating even to people

23
00:01:19.840 --> 00:01:21.519
<v Speaker 1>who maybe came into the field and just kind of

24
00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>learned what this thing was but don't necessarily know the

25
00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>history behind it. There's a lot of interesting stuff to unpack.

26
00:01:26.760 --> 00:01:28.719
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, do you join us for the first time,

27
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're in for. If you're a turning person,

28
00:01:30.359 --> 00:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>then welcome back. I hope that you continue to enjoy

29
00:01:32.439 --> 00:01:34.719
<v Speaker 1>what we put out for you and that this feels

30
00:01:34.799 --> 00:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of a spirit in kind to I've described in Either way,

31
00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>if you like to support us, then you can join

32
00:01:40.400 --> 00:01:44.599
<v Speaker 1>us on Patreon, leave us a rating and review, like subscribe,

33
00:01:44.799 --> 00:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tell a friend. I'll say more about the ways you

34
00:01:46.959 --> 00:01:50.159
<v Speaker 1>can support us at the end of this discussion. But

35
00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:53.439
<v Speaker 1>if you're joining us on the day that this publishes,

36
00:01:53.719 --> 00:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>then Happy July twenty ninth. Witch is anniversary of the

37
00:01:58.280 --> 00:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Army Chaplain Corps.

38
00:02:00.439 --> 00:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah sure, it's also Cheese Sacrifice Purchase Day.

39
00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:06.439
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't want to know what that is, so

40
00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that it can live in my mind as whatever I

41
00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:12.199
<v Speaker 1>am imagining it to be just probably not correct, but

42
00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I want it to stay that way.

43
00:02:13.400 --> 00:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh, yeah, yeah, yeah, it's a nice it's a

44
00:02:15.159 --> 00:02:16.879
<v Speaker 2>nice mazzarell up on a cross.

45
00:02:17.159 --> 00:02:22.319
<v Speaker 1>You're not far off. I imagine here more Temple of

46
00:02:22.360 --> 00:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>doom e. But yeah, International Tiger Day is also July

47
00:02:28.360 --> 00:02:29.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty ninth, Yes it is.

48
00:02:29.639 --> 00:02:32.840
<v Speaker 2>It's also international or I'm sorry, just national. That's National

49
00:02:32.919 --> 00:02:33.759
<v Speaker 2>Lasagna Day.

50
00:02:34.039 --> 00:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh I like me some lasagna. That's good, good stuff,

51
00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>good stuff right there? National Lipstick Day.

52
00:02:40.199 --> 00:02:43.479
<v Speaker 2>Sure. Yes, it's rain Day, which is every day in Florida.

53
00:02:44.120 --> 00:02:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, seriously, And it is Hepatitis Awareness Week. It's raining

54
00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>hepatitis hopefully.

55
00:02:50.879 --> 00:02:53.479
<v Speaker 2>No, that sounds like one of the weird plagues that

56
00:02:53.520 --> 00:02:54.719
<v Speaker 2>they didn't talk about in the Bible.

57
00:02:54.960 --> 00:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, that's a bad day. That's a bad day.

58
00:02:57.199 --> 00:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to be out in there. Yeah, nope,

59
00:02:59.039 --> 00:03:02.439
<v Speaker 1>probably find that in Florida too, possibly, Texas definitely, joy

60
00:03:02.639 --> 00:03:09.199
<v Speaker 1>all right, definitely Tennessee. I don't know. I'm just throwing

61
00:03:09.240 --> 00:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>southern states under the bus right now, you know. Yeah, yeah,

62
00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:15.479
<v Speaker 1>places where there's a lot of jerrymandering that has resulted

63
00:03:15.520 --> 00:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in a crazy disproportioned amount of conservative representation in places

64
00:03:19.439 --> 00:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that do not have that many conservative voters. Because that's

65
00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:23.759
<v Speaker 1>how jerry mandering works. Maybe we need to do an

66
00:03:23.759 --> 00:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>episode on jerrymandering that feels.

67
00:03:25.599 --> 00:03:27.599
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, that's got to go somewhere.

68
00:03:27.800 --> 00:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>It was like a thing that we would do. Anyway,

69
00:03:30.680 --> 00:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about those holidays is for this discussion,

70
00:03:33.199 --> 00:03:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Nor are we talking about gerrymandering, despite how much time

71
00:03:36.879 --> 00:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we have already spent on both of those topics. No, No, Instead,

72
00:03:40.919 --> 00:03:45.479
<v Speaker 1>we're getting deep into the history, the science, the philosophy,

73
00:03:45.680 --> 00:03:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the inner workings, if he will, of applied behavior analysis,

74
00:03:49.199 --> 00:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and arguably one of the most fundamental purposes of behavior

75
00:03:53.439 --> 00:03:56.919
<v Speaker 1>science more broadly is to understand why certain forms of

76
00:03:56.919 --> 00:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>behavior happen and what can be done to change those

77
00:04:00.439 --> 00:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>behaviors when they are not serving the interest of the

78
00:04:03.599 --> 00:04:07.879
<v Speaker 1>behaving organism. And that's an inherent value that I think

79
00:04:07.919 --> 00:04:12.199
<v Speaker 1>sometimes gets missed. And what the behavior scientist does is

80
00:04:12.800 --> 00:04:17.079
<v Speaker 1>we change behavior because changing behavior helps improve and save lives.

81
00:04:17.120 --> 00:04:20.439
<v Speaker 1>At least that should be the circumstances. Now, there's a

82
00:04:20.480 --> 00:04:22.439
<v Speaker 1>lot to impact inside of that in terms of who's

83
00:04:22.480 --> 00:04:25.759
<v Speaker 1>choosing what improved means and under what circumstances does someone

84
00:04:25.839 --> 00:04:29.519
<v Speaker 1>make that choice, And that's not what we're getting into today.

85
00:04:29.639 --> 00:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And so if you do have thoughts on that, feel

86
00:04:31.800 --> 00:04:34.519
<v Speaker 1>free to let us know. But that's not where we're going,

87
00:04:34.560 --> 00:04:36.519
<v Speaker 1>So don't be distracted by the fact that I said it.

88
00:04:36.759 --> 00:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I just want to clarify that, Like, when we're doing

89
00:04:39.279 --> 00:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>this thing, generally speaking, those of us who got into

90
00:04:41.839 --> 00:04:44.959
<v Speaker 1>this profession got into it to be a helping profession,

91
00:04:45.040 --> 00:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like we want to help people, And if you think

92
00:04:47.560 --> 00:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>about all the various other helping professions, they also involve

93
00:04:51.199 --> 00:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>changing and usually changing behavior and changing something about an organism.

94
00:04:55.560 --> 00:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>See our Discussions of disability for more about like the

95
00:04:58.079 --> 00:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>various models and philosophies about that. I feel like I've

96
00:05:00.879 --> 00:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>dug myself a giant hole I'm trying to climb out of.

97
00:05:03.720 --> 00:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Point being, the fundamental purpose of behavior science is to

98
00:05:07.439 --> 00:05:09.439
<v Speaker 1>understand why behavior happens. Let me leave it at that.

99
00:05:09.959 --> 00:05:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's fine. This is going to be an episode

100
00:05:12.079 --> 00:05:15.639
<v Speaker 2>largely about apply behavior analysis, specifically the methods by which

101
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:18.839
<v Speaker 2>we attempt to understand certain behavior forms or what we

102
00:05:18.879 --> 00:05:21.839
<v Speaker 2>call topographies, and more specifically the forms of behavior that

103
00:05:21.879 --> 00:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>are thought of as problematic or identified as like maybe

104
00:05:25.079 --> 00:05:26.920
<v Speaker 2>having an impact on somebody's quality of life.

105
00:05:27.120 --> 00:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they could maybe just be described as challenging. There

106
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:34.319
<v Speaker 1>are some that are like directly violent and have harm

107
00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:36.879
<v Speaker 1>involved in them, So there's like there's those things to unpack.

108
00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into more of those as we get into

109
00:05:38.959 --> 00:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this discussion, but there is an assessment performed to understand

110
00:05:43.079 --> 00:05:47.399
<v Speaker 1>these challenging behaviors, and it is called a functional analysis,

111
00:05:48.079 --> 00:05:51.519
<v Speaker 1>very commonly abbreviated as FA. I am sure in this

112
00:05:51.560 --> 00:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>discussion many times we're going to oscillate between calling it

113
00:05:55.160 --> 00:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>an FA and a functional analysis. But know that when

114
00:05:58.279 --> 00:06:01.079
<v Speaker 1>we say FA, that's what we're talking about. Functional A

115
00:06:01.240 --> 00:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>for analysis FA. And what is most certainly two or

116
00:06:04.879 --> 00:06:08.079
<v Speaker 1>more episodes. I'm actually kind of explicitly planning on this

117
00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to be three based on how much there is to

118
00:06:10.759 --> 00:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>even talk about with this. We're going to unpack what

119
00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:18.879
<v Speaker 1>functional analyzes are. They're incredibly storied history and evolution, modern

120
00:06:18.920 --> 00:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>approaches to functional analyzes and controversies around them. And eventually

121
00:06:23.839 --> 00:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll even get to our own hot takes about various

122
00:06:26.879 --> 00:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>aspects of this topic, which I know you're all here,

123
00:06:30.399 --> 00:06:31.959
<v Speaker 1>like you're here for the hot takes. Let's be real,

124
00:06:32.079 --> 00:06:32.519
<v Speaker 1>of course.

125
00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you like when we get spicy.

126
00:06:34.480 --> 00:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we get on our soapbox. We got things

127
00:06:37.839 --> 00:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to say. So that's what we're up to right now.

128
00:06:40.920 --> 00:06:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Is like, for those of you who have been with us,

129
00:06:42.879 --> 00:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>who are like the behavior analysts among you. You've heard us

130
00:06:45.480 --> 00:06:48.199
<v Speaker 1>talking for a long time. We've hardly have we ever

131
00:06:48.360 --> 00:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>gone this much in a single direction, but it kind

132
00:06:51.560 --> 00:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of has been one that's been on the list for

133
00:06:53.160 --> 00:06:54.959
<v Speaker 1>me for a long time of like, we do need

134
00:06:55.000 --> 00:06:56.959
<v Speaker 1>to get to this at some point, and the timing

135
00:06:56.959 --> 00:06:59.519
<v Speaker 1>felt right. We're here. Yeah, this is not like a

136
00:06:59.560 --> 00:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>sweet like we've done on normal suites, but it is

137
00:07:01.240 --> 00:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be multipart. It's going to take a while

138
00:07:03.040 --> 00:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to unpack all of this discussion now. I feel like

139
00:07:05.600 --> 00:07:09.079
<v Speaker 1>I breathed through our preamble fairly quickly before we got

140
00:07:09.079 --> 00:07:11.079
<v Speaker 1>into this, and we already have now burned through our intro.

141
00:07:11.199 --> 00:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything that I missed or you'd like to

142
00:07:13.480 --> 00:07:15.319
<v Speaker 1>add or something that's important to help set this up

143
00:07:15.319 --> 00:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the meat of our topic here.

144
00:07:17.759 --> 00:07:19.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the big thing to understand here and we're

145
00:07:19.839 --> 00:07:22.759
<v Speaker 2>going to really unpack this is this is an assessment. Yes,

146
00:07:23.040 --> 00:07:25.759
<v Speaker 2>Like this is ultimately a discovery process, and like one

147
00:07:25.800 --> 00:07:27.319
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite things about assessment is that it is

148
00:07:27.360 --> 00:07:29.800
<v Speaker 2>a discovery process, which means that we're not when we

149
00:07:29.800 --> 00:07:32.720
<v Speaker 2>talk about this, we are not intervening right at this moment,

150
00:07:32.800 --> 00:07:35.079
<v Speaker 2>Like when we're doing this, it is a discovery. We

151
00:07:35.120 --> 00:07:39.759
<v Speaker 2>are gathering information so that we can better design interventions

152
00:07:40.199 --> 00:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>for the folks that we're serving when we do these assessments.

153
00:07:42.360 --> 00:07:44.040
<v Speaker 2>So like I think, like just to kind of like

154
00:07:44.399 --> 00:07:47.519
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about this, we are in a discovery phase,

155
00:07:47.560 --> 00:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>which means we have questions to ask in questions to

156
00:07:51.079 --> 00:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>answer inside of this and that'll become more apparent as

157
00:07:53.839 --> 00:07:55.959
<v Speaker 2>we talk about the structure and the outcomes and stuff

158
00:07:56.000 --> 00:07:58.360
<v Speaker 2>with this assessment. But it is an assessment and that's

159
00:07:58.399 --> 00:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think that people tend to conflate assessment and

160
00:08:00.959 --> 00:08:04.319
<v Speaker 2>intervention sometimes, and that's we're not intervening, we are just discovering.

161
00:08:05.000 --> 00:08:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Now that being said, I think in the philosophy of this,

162
00:08:09.319 --> 00:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you can make the arguments that even as part of

163
00:08:11.600 --> 00:08:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the assessment process, it can have intervention like effects. That's

164
00:08:17.000 --> 00:08:19.759
<v Speaker 1>not your tension of it, but those things exist, and

165
00:08:19.800 --> 00:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we will get actually into that specifically when we get

166
00:08:22.279 --> 00:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to the later parts of this discussion, but we don't

167
00:08:25.040 --> 00:08:26.639
<v Speaker 1>need to go there today. The point of this is

168
00:08:26.639 --> 00:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that it was designed to be an assessment tool that

169
00:08:30.079 --> 00:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>would then later inform intervention. That was that's sort of

170
00:08:33.559 --> 00:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the point. The purpose, the raison detra if you will.

171
00:08:37.559 --> 00:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where this thing sort of comes from. But we

172
00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>actually need to even go back further in the history

173
00:08:42.879 --> 00:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of behavior analysis. The term functional analysis has been used

174
00:08:47.320 --> 00:08:49.759
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time, going back probably I think

175
00:08:49.759 --> 00:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred years from some of the dates that

176
00:08:51.600 --> 00:08:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I saw, and an early behavior analysis doing something that

177
00:08:56.360 --> 00:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>was a functional analysis, calling what you were doing functional

178
00:09:00.559 --> 00:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>analysis was a somewhat cerebral, maybe conceptual exercise in which

179
00:09:07.919 --> 00:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>some behaviors or classes of behaviors or behavior topographies they

180
00:09:13.000 --> 00:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>were described in terms of a variety of variables that

181
00:09:17.240 --> 00:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>led to the evolution and development of those behaviors, as

182
00:09:21.360 --> 00:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>well as the maintenance and continued evolution and development of

183
00:09:26.399 --> 00:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>those behaviors. So, just to say that another way, people

184
00:09:29.399 --> 00:09:32.399
<v Speaker 1>would say they were doing a functional analysis, when what

185
00:09:32.480 --> 00:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they were kind of doing was like saying, let's conceptualize

186
00:09:36.480 --> 00:09:40.039
<v Speaker 1>these behaviors to try and understand where they come from,

187
00:09:40.480 --> 00:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>where they're going, how they got to be the way

188
00:09:43.879 --> 00:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that they are, and they kind of just talked through it,

189
00:09:45.879 --> 00:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, they ad mused through it, they'd think on it,

190
00:09:47.840 --> 00:09:50.039
<v Speaker 1>and they had a lot of important things to say.

191
00:09:50.080 --> 00:09:53.639
<v Speaker 1>There's a sort of applying the principles, we understand about

192
00:09:53.679 --> 00:09:58.519
<v Speaker 1>how behavior works, to an observation of some kinds of behaviors,

193
00:09:58.519 --> 00:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>often classes of behaviors, and say, let's understand how these

194
00:10:02.600 --> 00:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>things work together. What's the function of them, if you will,

195
00:10:07.039 --> 00:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And so it was it was kind of this conceptual

196
00:10:09.519 --> 00:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>thing when it was used back at these in these times.

197
00:10:13.000 --> 00:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So, for instance, what a BF. Skinner's most important

198
00:10:16.080 --> 00:10:18.759
<v Speaker 2>and widely used books is Verbal Behavior, which he describes

199
00:10:18.840 --> 00:10:21.840
<v Speaker 2>as a functional analysis of language. Now, in it, he

200
00:10:21.919 --> 00:10:24.919
<v Speaker 2>proposes that language can be conceptualized as behaviors that occur

201
00:10:25.039 --> 00:10:27.960
<v Speaker 2>in certain context and have specific effects for the speaker,

202
00:10:28.240 --> 00:10:31.279
<v Speaker 2>as media by moment to moment motivations and interactions with

203
00:10:31.799 --> 00:10:34.639
<v Speaker 2>a social audience. So basically, like our language is shaped

204
00:10:34.679 --> 00:10:37.120
<v Speaker 2>by our context and like the audit who we're talking to,

205
00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:40.279
<v Speaker 2>and like what we need to say and all that stuff. Now,

206
00:10:40.559 --> 00:10:43.320
<v Speaker 2>units of language can be categorized by how they work

207
00:10:43.919 --> 00:10:46.440
<v Speaker 2>and probably worth a full discussion at some point in time.

208
00:10:46.600 --> 00:10:49.240
<v Speaker 2>But essentially what he's saying is like a functional analysis

209
00:10:49.240 --> 00:10:51.159
<v Speaker 2>of language, which is really interesting because he's not really

210
00:10:51.240 --> 00:10:53.279
<v Speaker 2>doing a functional analysis of language because it was an

211
00:10:53.279 --> 00:10:56.279
<v Speaker 2>interpretive analysis because you couldn't actually do the functional analysis

212
00:10:56.279 --> 00:10:57.679
<v Speaker 2>of the language at the time, because it didn't exist.

213
00:10:57.720 --> 00:11:00.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a whole thing. But more to the point, what

214
00:11:00.159 --> 00:11:03.399
<v Speaker 2>he's saying is he's analyzing the context and the variables

215
00:11:03.440 --> 00:11:04.519
<v Speaker 2>in which language occurs.

216
00:11:05.000 --> 00:11:08.799
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you're you're right. And I think how we

217
00:11:08.919 --> 00:11:11.759
<v Speaker 1>use the term functional analysis today would make it a

218
00:11:11.799 --> 00:11:14.759
<v Speaker 1>little bit confusing to call what he did a functional analysis.

219
00:11:14.759 --> 00:11:18.519
<v Speaker 1>But at the time, again, because that term was more cerebral,

220
00:11:18.559 --> 00:11:22.039
<v Speaker 1>it was more conceptual, like for that time, a functional

221
00:11:22.039 --> 00:11:26.519
<v Speaker 1>analysis was an apt description for that exercise. Sure, but yes,

222
00:11:26.559 --> 00:11:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I think saying it, calling it an interpretation, I think

223
00:11:28.480 --> 00:11:32.159
<v Speaker 1>is perfectly legitimate, like that is equivalently, I guess if

224
00:11:32.200 --> 00:11:33.759
<v Speaker 1>you want to put it that way. Kind of what

225
00:11:33.799 --> 00:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>he was up to in that discussion was like, let's yeah,

226
00:11:36.759 --> 00:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>let's try and superimpose a philosophy over classes of language

227
00:11:41.879 --> 00:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and say, like, and when we see communication happening, we

228
00:11:46.399 --> 00:11:49.919
<v Speaker 1>can understand that through the behavioral principles that have been

229
00:11:49.960 --> 00:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>described so far by behaviorism, and that that in and

230
00:11:54.360 --> 00:11:58.039
<v Speaker 1>of itself is a kind of functional analysis at the time.

231
00:11:58.200 --> 00:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And really, again, the point of this is not to

232
00:12:00.440 --> 00:12:04.799
<v Speaker 1>dig in on Skinner's verbal behavior, probably something to unpack

233
00:12:04.799 --> 00:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in the future. A very seminal thing that is hugely

234
00:12:08.480 --> 00:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>impactful in the field of behavior analysis and behaviorism more broadly.

235
00:12:12.679 --> 00:12:14.879
<v Speaker 1>But the point is that, like that's what was sort

236
00:12:14.879 --> 00:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of described as functional analysis at the time. Now again,

237
00:12:18.360 --> 00:12:20.519
<v Speaker 1>the point really at this point was just that functional

238
00:12:20.559 --> 00:12:25.279
<v Speaker 1>analysis back in the earlier days of the philosophy of

239
00:12:25.320 --> 00:12:30.639
<v Speaker 1>this field looked more like pontificating about behavior environment relations

240
00:12:31.240 --> 00:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>before the name functional analysis. The term was repurposed to

241
00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>describe a specific assessment technique, which is what we'll get into,

242
00:12:38.279 --> 00:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Like we're headed that direction. But just the point being that,

243
00:12:42.159 --> 00:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like that's kind of what was really being said when

244
00:12:44.320 --> 00:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>people use that phrase functional analysis before it became what

245
00:12:49.320 --> 00:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it became as an assessment.

246
00:12:51.399 --> 00:12:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it's kind of like how people use

247
00:12:53.240 --> 00:13:03.879
<v Speaker 2>the term evil before they call them ads. So we

248
00:13:03.919 --> 00:13:06.759
<v Speaker 2>are talking about the history of functional analysis and behavior

249
00:13:06.799 --> 00:13:08.679
<v Speaker 2>analysis in general and kind of where this came from.

250
00:13:08.720 --> 00:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Now we are going to go all the way back

251
00:13:10.759 --> 00:13:12.759
<v Speaker 2>in our way back machine, which I always thought was

252
00:13:12.799 --> 00:13:15.279
<v Speaker 2>a strange thing to call a time machine. I feel

253
00:13:15.320 --> 00:13:19.440
<v Speaker 2>like time machine is way more fun. Wayback machine sounds strange,

254
00:13:19.600 --> 00:13:22.320
<v Speaker 2>But maybe that's from so, you know, from that cartoon

255
00:13:22.519 --> 00:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>show mister Peabody and Truman or whatever. But we're going

256
00:13:25.480 --> 00:13:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to go all the way back and we're going to

257
00:13:26.480 --> 00:13:29.360
<v Speaker 2>talk about behavior analysis before it was described as applied. Actually,

258
00:13:29.639 --> 00:13:32.519
<v Speaker 2>it was most commonly referred to as behavior modification, and

259
00:13:32.559 --> 00:13:34.879
<v Speaker 2>we did an episode about this forever ago. What we

260
00:13:34.960 --> 00:13:37.879
<v Speaker 2>understood is that you could gradually direct behavior to different

261
00:13:37.919 --> 00:13:41.360
<v Speaker 2>forms by providing or withholding positive reinforcers such as tokens,

262
00:13:41.440 --> 00:13:44.120
<v Speaker 2>special snacks, privileges, or social encouragements.

263
00:13:44.240 --> 00:13:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Strategically, yeah, that is to say that, like, if you

264
00:13:47.279 --> 00:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to change what behaviors were happening, you could just

265
00:13:51.120 --> 00:13:57.039
<v Speaker 1>alter or specifically superimpose certain rewards as consequences for those behaviors,

266
00:13:57.039 --> 00:14:00.759
<v Speaker 1>outcomes for those behaviors, and that could sort of direct

267
00:14:00.840 --> 00:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the behavior where you wanted it to go. Now, we're

268
00:14:03.440 --> 00:14:05.279
<v Speaker 1>going to er out a little dirty laundry here, because

269
00:14:05.279 --> 00:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the past and people did not get

270
00:14:07.240 --> 00:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things right back in the fifties. This

271
00:14:09.600 --> 00:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>also included things like providing cigarettes that could be a

272
00:14:13.360 --> 00:14:16.159
<v Speaker 1>reinforcer that was like a reward that they could earn,

273
00:14:16.639 --> 00:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not something that would be done today. And it also

274
00:14:19.840 --> 00:14:24.639
<v Speaker 1>included things like providing or removing aversives they might do

275
00:14:24.720 --> 00:14:28.399
<v Speaker 1>things such as withholding privileges or taking privileges away. They

276
00:14:28.480 --> 00:14:30.639
<v Speaker 1>might even do things such as exposing them to foul

277
00:14:30.720 --> 00:14:34.639
<v Speaker 1>smells or things as far as even like electric shock

278
00:14:35.000 --> 00:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to humans. We've talked about this in previous episodes as well.

279
00:14:37.799 --> 00:14:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Go see those for a more in depth discussion about

280
00:14:40.759 --> 00:14:43.559
<v Speaker 1>what was going on there. Suffice to say, in these times,

281
00:14:43.639 --> 00:14:47.679
<v Speaker 1>what they ran into was there was something we wanted

282
00:14:47.679 --> 00:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to change about what someone was doing. We can either

283
00:14:50.600 --> 00:14:55.039
<v Speaker 1>provide some kind of punishments to decrease certain behaviors we

284
00:14:55.039 --> 00:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>don't like, and or we can provide certain rewards to

285
00:14:58.480 --> 00:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>try and increase certain behaviors that we like or that

286
00:15:01.159 --> 00:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we'd like to see more of. And that was essentially

287
00:15:03.279 --> 00:15:04.879
<v Speaker 1>what they could just do. They would just like apply

288
00:15:05.120 --> 00:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that thing as they saw fit, I guess in those circumstances.

289
00:15:09.679 --> 00:15:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, if there was some perceived reason to change

290
00:15:12.799 --> 00:15:15.600
<v Speaker 2>behavior patterns, and we say perceived because many people made

291
00:15:15.600 --> 00:15:19.360
<v Speaker 2>many decisions for people without consulting them or including them, Yep,

292
00:15:19.440 --> 00:15:23.039
<v Speaker 2>someone could orchestrate this. This's is behavior change through strategic

293
00:15:23.159 --> 00:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>use of rewards and punishments. And you might think this

294
00:15:25.159 --> 00:15:27.279
<v Speaker 2>would not work that easily or that well, and you'd

295
00:15:27.320 --> 00:15:30.039
<v Speaker 2>be wrong. It's honestly surprising and even a little scary

296
00:15:30.320 --> 00:15:33.799
<v Speaker 2>how effectively this works, even among people for whom language

297
00:15:33.799 --> 00:15:37.120
<v Speaker 2>can effectively change behavior. So like, it's pretty astounding to

298
00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:37.759
<v Speaker 2>see this work.

299
00:15:38.320 --> 00:15:41.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean you really. A lot of people are like, oh,

300
00:15:41.519 --> 00:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just simple rewards, Like you can't do that much

301
00:15:43.440 --> 00:15:48.879
<v Speaker 1>with that. I'm like, yeah, you actually can accomplish a lot,

302
00:15:49.279 --> 00:15:51.519
<v Speaker 1>even with people that you can just like tell them things.

303
00:15:52.759 --> 00:15:57.159
<v Speaker 1>When you specifically use outcomes, rewards and punishments in this way,

304
00:15:57.559 --> 00:16:00.799
<v Speaker 1>you'd be impressed. Like, how far I mean impressed. Again,

305
00:16:00.840 --> 00:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a little surprising in some cases, a little scary

306
00:16:03.279 --> 00:16:06.799
<v Speaker 1>how far you can actually drive behavior in ways that

307
00:16:06.919 --> 00:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>might surprise you. So don't discount it because it feels simplistic.

308
00:16:11.279 --> 00:16:16.399
<v Speaker 1>It is remarkably effective and powerful. Right anyway, not that

309
00:16:16.440 --> 00:16:19.759
<v Speaker 1>we're trying. We've talked about this. We're moving on all right,

310
00:16:20.879 --> 00:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>as we know, So we're talking about like a long time,

311
00:16:22.720 --> 00:16:25.559
<v Speaker 1>many many decades ago, nearly a center ago. Most often

312
00:16:25.840 --> 00:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>this was applied to people who were institutionalized or otherwise

313
00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:34.279
<v Speaker 1>had some diagnosis that probably meant some significant impairment. These

314
00:16:34.279 --> 00:16:37.679
<v Speaker 1>are people who often had little language, often little education,

315
00:16:38.159 --> 00:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>They might have lacked other self care skills, including and

316
00:16:41.559 --> 00:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>up to the ability to clothe and feed themselves or

317
00:16:43.879 --> 00:16:47.399
<v Speaker 1>even use the restroom the toilet independently. There were wide

318
00:16:47.399 --> 00:16:50.519
<v Speaker 1>swaths of this, but those tended to be the populations

319
00:16:50.559 --> 00:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>where you were likely to see this kind of work

320
00:16:52.519 --> 00:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>being done as people who had disabilities. Often they might

321
00:16:57.159 --> 00:17:00.919
<v Speaker 1>have called these profound disabilities, and often it meant that

322
00:17:00.919 --> 00:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>these were people again who just had repertoires such that

323
00:17:04.920 --> 00:17:07.759
<v Speaker 1>there was relatively little they could do at the time

324
00:17:08.240 --> 00:17:11.279
<v Speaker 1>with very much independence. And to be fair, like, we're

325
00:17:11.279 --> 00:17:14.279
<v Speaker 1>not granted very many opportunities to do anything with very

326
00:17:14.359 --> 00:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>much independence. They were really not often even thought of

327
00:17:17.240 --> 00:17:20.319
<v Speaker 1>or treated as if they could have those things, and

328
00:17:21.000 --> 00:17:25.279
<v Speaker 1>loved ones weren't consulted, they weren't consulted themselves. Oftentimes it

329
00:17:25.400 --> 00:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of up to the doctor who made decisions,

330
00:17:27.160 --> 00:17:29.039
<v Speaker 1>and then they did the things according to what that

331
00:17:29.079 --> 00:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>person decided, which sometimes was pretty terrible. So understand that

332
00:17:33.480 --> 00:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>those that's where this is at. So that's kind of

333
00:17:35.359 --> 00:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the population with which you would tend to see this

334
00:17:37.880 --> 00:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>applied right and.

335
00:17:39.279 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 2>At the time, and the absence of behaviorists, these folks

336
00:17:42.119 --> 00:17:45.519
<v Speaker 2>disabilities might be locked in a cell, medicated, quote unquote,

337
00:17:45.519 --> 00:17:49.319
<v Speaker 2>medicated with sedatives, lobotomized, are incarcerated. This is a well

338
00:17:49.319 --> 00:17:51.880
<v Speaker 2>documented in very recent history that I think is really

339
00:17:51.920 --> 00:17:53.960
<v Speaker 2>important to note. This is not three hundred and four

340
00:17:54.000 --> 00:17:56.279
<v Speaker 2>hundred year ago. I mean, this was happening, you know,

341
00:17:56.440 --> 00:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>on some level many centuries ago, but this was happening

342
00:18:00.079 --> 00:18:01.519
<v Speaker 2>in the mid nineteen hundreds.

343
00:18:01.799 --> 00:18:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like sixties, seven years ago, like sixties.

344
00:18:04.440 --> 00:18:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And so yeah, So I mean it's this is a

345
00:18:06.000 --> 00:18:09.759
<v Speaker 2>recent history. So despite what sounds disrespectful of people with

346
00:18:09.799 --> 00:18:12.200
<v Speaker 2>disabilities in the way that it was approached by behaviors

347
00:18:12.200 --> 00:18:15.160
<v Speaker 2>of the time, it was actually much better than what

348
00:18:15.319 --> 00:18:18.079
<v Speaker 2>those people usually got. And that's not to excuse it,

349
00:18:18.160 --> 00:18:21.279
<v Speaker 2>but I think the context is really worth understanding here

350
00:18:21.599 --> 00:18:23.799
<v Speaker 2>that like whenever we talk about history, it's always a

351
00:18:23.799 --> 00:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>delicate situation because like these situations come up in like

352
00:18:27.200 --> 00:18:29.519
<v Speaker 2>we're in a situation now where we know better, so

353
00:18:29.559 --> 00:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>we try to do better, and in fifty years that's

354
00:18:33.440 --> 00:18:35.119
<v Speaker 2>going to be the same concept that we have today.

355
00:18:35.160 --> 00:18:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Like we're trying to make it so that we don't

356
00:18:37.759 --> 00:18:41.359
<v Speaker 2>have these terrible histories going forward, but it's going to

357
00:18:41.359 --> 00:18:43.960
<v Speaker 2>happen as we learn more stuff. And I think when

358
00:18:43.960 --> 00:18:45.640
<v Speaker 2>we look back at the history that was going on,

359
00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:49.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, you had situations where families had no idea

360
00:18:49.359 --> 00:18:53.279
<v Speaker 2>what disabilities were, and they were imparting different harms, or

361
00:18:53.599 --> 00:18:55.839
<v Speaker 2>they didn't know how to care for their children or

362
00:18:55.880 --> 00:18:59.519
<v Speaker 2>the people that they loved, And so institutions were arguably

363
00:18:59.640 --> 00:19:02.160
<v Speaker 2>a better option for folks that could receive round the

364
00:19:02.160 --> 00:19:05.720
<v Speaker 2>clock care rather than families who couldn't provide that. But again,

365
00:19:06.000 --> 00:19:08.240
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't mean it was good. Yeah, yeah, it was

366
00:19:08.319 --> 00:19:12.440
<v Speaker 2>incrementally better than what was maybe available, but not good.

367
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Life for people with disabilities was very very hard

368
00:19:16.799 --> 00:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>at this time, and they were often not treated with

369
00:19:20.400 --> 00:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>very much dignity and respect. And so if you had

370
00:19:24.079 --> 00:19:29.599
<v Speaker 1>some kind of diagnosis that and these range widely widely

371
00:19:29.640 --> 00:19:31.319
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what they might be. But like, assuming

372
00:19:31.359 --> 00:19:33.519
<v Speaker 1>you had something let's just say profound like autism, like

373
00:19:33.559 --> 00:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you might have described back then, like essentially that meant

374
00:19:37.200 --> 00:19:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably be sent to an institution. And in many

375
00:19:40.720 --> 00:19:43.519
<v Speaker 1>of these you were given enough drugs that you barely

376
00:19:43.559 --> 00:19:45.319
<v Speaker 1>moved and stuck in a cell and you basically lived

377
00:19:45.319 --> 00:19:47.880
<v Speaker 1>out your days that way. Yeah, behaviorists came along and

378
00:19:47.920 --> 00:19:51.119
<v Speaker 1>they said, well, actually we can teach these people things

379
00:19:51.160 --> 00:19:52.839
<v Speaker 1>we can we can have them do other stuff. We

380
00:19:52.880 --> 00:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>can teach some vocations, we can have them gain some independence,

381
00:19:56.720 --> 00:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and they would just be like, let's do em and

382
00:19:59.039 --> 00:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>MS or or privileges. Cigarettes will We'll give them these

383
00:20:02.640 --> 00:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>things as rewards to help teach them, give them feedback

384
00:20:05.960 --> 00:20:07.599
<v Speaker 1>on these new skills that they're learning, and they'll learn

385
00:20:07.640 --> 00:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>them faster and be able to do this. So while

386
00:20:10.039 --> 00:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>all of that sounds you're like looking at going none

387
00:20:12.240 --> 00:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of this is good. The situation where someone came in

388
00:20:15.680 --> 00:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and thought, maybe we can teach these people things, Maybe

389
00:20:18.200 --> 00:20:20.519
<v Speaker 1>we can get them to do stuff that require that

390
00:20:20.759 --> 00:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>means that they don't have to wear mechanical restraints all day.

391
00:20:23.799 --> 00:20:25.599
<v Speaker 1>They're not like handcuffs, they don't have to stay in

392
00:20:25.599 --> 00:20:27.119
<v Speaker 1>a patent room all day, they don't have to be

393
00:20:27.160 --> 00:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>on so many medications. Ultimately, it was probably in the

394
00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>better interest of those people and is not still what

395
00:20:33.960 --> 00:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we would have done now knowing what we know. So

396
00:20:36.839 --> 00:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>just trying to paint the broad context to make sure

397
00:20:39.119 --> 00:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it's really clear. As you were saying, like, I think

398
00:20:40.400 --> 00:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you said it really well, but I just wanted to

399
00:20:41.759 --> 00:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>say it again of like understanding where things were at

400
00:20:45.240 --> 00:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and that you know, when they had

401
00:20:48.240 --> 00:20:49.799
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, they didn't know what the future was going

402
00:20:49.880 --> 00:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to look like. Back then, this looked like probably the

403
00:20:52.000 --> 00:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>most humanitarian thing that was going on, right, right, And

404
00:20:55.000 --> 00:20:57.759
<v Speaker 1>now we know better, like we treat people with considerably

405
00:20:57.799 --> 00:21:00.279
<v Speaker 1>more respect now than we did back then, and fully

406
00:21:00.319 --> 00:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll do way better still.

407
00:21:02.079 --> 00:21:05.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is exactly why we are wanting to fight

408
00:21:05.119 --> 00:21:09.440
<v Speaker 2>this current administration from implementing institutions again, right, because this

409
00:21:09.599 --> 00:21:10.599
<v Speaker 2>was not the way to go.

410
00:21:11.000 --> 00:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, this was bad, exactly. At some point in time,

411
00:21:16.279 --> 00:21:18.559
<v Speaker 1>it finally became clear that like a better approach to

412
00:21:18.640 --> 00:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>changing behavior was understood. It was to understand why those

413
00:21:22.920 --> 00:21:25.759
<v Speaker 1>behaviors were occurring in the first place. Back then, they

414
00:21:25.759 --> 00:21:27.279
<v Speaker 1>were just sort of like we can use words and

415
00:21:27.279 --> 00:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>punishments and change behavior, and instead what was happening is

416
00:21:31.119 --> 00:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they're like, under what conditions does the behavior occur? And

417
00:21:36.000 --> 00:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>if we understand that, then maybe we can do something

418
00:21:38.400 --> 00:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit differently about this. So it gave rise

419
00:21:41.279 --> 00:21:45.599
<v Speaker 1>to a hypothesis about how we might determine what conditions

420
00:21:45.759 --> 00:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>gave rise to and maintained some of those behavior patterns.

421
00:21:50.440 --> 00:21:53.559
<v Speaker 1>And a quick language note here, when we're talking about

422
00:21:53.559 --> 00:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea of like understanding why behaviors happen, This assessment

423
00:21:57.720 --> 00:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>can only be performed on behaviors that happen, and we

424
00:22:02.279 --> 00:22:06.079
<v Speaker 1>can't assess behaviors that aren't happening. And I know this

425
00:22:06.119 --> 00:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>seems like an obvious observation, but people have asked me

426
00:22:09.359 --> 00:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>me personally, and I've heard seen this asked in other

427
00:22:12.799 --> 00:22:15.519
<v Speaker 1>places too. They say, like, why are you not performing

428
00:22:15.599 --> 00:22:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a functional analysis what we're getting to on a skilled deficit?

429
00:22:20.000 --> 00:22:22.279
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is is because you can't assess a

430
00:22:22.319 --> 00:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>behavior that isn't happening. So the point, just a quick

431
00:22:26.279 --> 00:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>note on the language here, is essentially what happened is

432
00:22:28.519 --> 00:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they sort of figured, we're seeing these behaviors occur, these

433
00:22:31.200 --> 00:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>other challenging behaviors that's resulting in these people being put

434
00:22:34.920 --> 00:22:37.599
<v Speaker 1>in handcuffs, locked up, or sedated or all of those things.

435
00:22:38.359 --> 00:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And they were just like, we'll use can rewards and

436
00:22:40.440 --> 00:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>punishments to change their behavior. And then they sort of realized, well,

437
00:22:43.720 --> 00:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>what if we just try to understand why they're doing

438
00:22:45.880 --> 00:22:49.599
<v Speaker 1>those behaviors in the first place, that might then inform

439
00:22:50.039 --> 00:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>something that we could do differently. Why would these people

440
00:22:54.720 --> 00:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>play ads? Okay, so we're back Essentially, we described what

441
00:23:05.599 --> 00:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>gave rise to the hypothesis that we could understand behavior

442
00:23:08.640 --> 00:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>by understanding why it occurs in the first place. And

443
00:23:11.160 --> 00:23:13.279
<v Speaker 1>then just a quick side note about the fact that

444
00:23:13.400 --> 00:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>many people might be like, well, if functional analysis is

445
00:23:16.400 --> 00:23:17.559
<v Speaker 1>the way to go, we should do it for everything,

446
00:23:17.599 --> 00:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>including skill deficess I'm like, yeah, but that's a behavior

447
00:23:20.160 --> 00:23:22.759
<v Speaker 1>that's not happening. We can't assess nothing. We have to

448
00:23:22.799 --> 00:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>assess something, so it has to happen for us to

449
00:23:25.279 --> 00:23:27.319
<v Speaker 1>assess it. So just a note that make sure that

450
00:23:27.319 --> 00:23:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that's clear.

451
00:23:28.079 --> 00:23:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, So the logic of the functional analysis

452
00:23:31.480 --> 00:23:34.759
<v Speaker 2>was to see if providing certain scenarios would provoke the

453
00:23:34.799 --> 00:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>behavior in question, and if reinforcing that behavior with related

454
00:23:38.240 --> 00:23:41.559
<v Speaker 2>outcomes tend to occur for that individual resulted in higher

455
00:23:41.640 --> 00:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>rates of that behavior. So basically what they're talking about

456
00:23:44.039 --> 00:23:47.440
<v Speaker 2>is we present a scenario, if the behavior occurs, we

457
00:23:47.519 --> 00:23:50.400
<v Speaker 2>present a related outcome, and let's see if that has

458
00:23:50.440 --> 00:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>an impact or influences the behavior in some way, and.

459
00:23:53.160 --> 00:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into specific examples. That makes because that probably

460
00:23:56.160 --> 00:23:58.519
<v Speaker 1>sounds vague if you're not really sure what we're talking about,

461
00:23:58.519 --> 00:24:01.079
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get into some specific examples. I'll just give

462
00:24:01.119 --> 00:24:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you one. Now. Actually, let's just say there's a scenario

463
00:24:03.680 --> 00:24:06.039
<v Speaker 1>where like this person's asked to brusht their teeth and

464
00:24:06.079 --> 00:24:07.799
<v Speaker 1>whenever they're asked to brush of teeth, they throw their

465
00:24:07.839 --> 00:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>toothbrush or they throw it at the staff and maybe

466
00:24:10.200 --> 00:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>go and try and punch them. They're like, ah, what's happening.

467
00:24:12.160 --> 00:24:14.799
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they're like, okay, let's do this. Let's present

468
00:24:14.839 --> 00:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the scenario of brushing teeth and then when they if

469
00:24:18.519 --> 00:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they throw the toothbrush they attack the staff. Whatever it is,

470
00:24:21.359 --> 00:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to provide a very specific outcome and see

471
00:24:23.759 --> 00:24:25.559
<v Speaker 1>if that's why they do it. Just would make the

472
00:24:25.720 --> 00:24:27.839
<v Speaker 1>first one to make the staff go away, And see

473
00:24:27.839 --> 00:24:29.559
<v Speaker 1>if whenever we ask them the brush to teeth, they

474
00:24:29.640 --> 00:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>want the staff to go away and stop asking them

475
00:24:31.519 --> 00:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the brush their teeth, like they wouldn't want to figure

476
00:24:32.960 --> 00:24:35.079
<v Speaker 1>out if that's what's going on. And so that's what

477
00:24:35.079 --> 00:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we mean here is like as an example of a

478
00:24:37.359 --> 00:24:39.799
<v Speaker 1>scenario where it's like, let's figure out there's something going on,

479
00:24:40.680 --> 00:24:42.279
<v Speaker 1>and we want to figure out why it's going on.

480
00:24:42.440 --> 00:24:47.759
<v Speaker 1>So let's systematically create the situation and then create applausible

481
00:24:47.839 --> 00:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>outcome that could be what they're trying to get after, like,

482
00:24:51.039 --> 00:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what are they're trying to get out of this behavior

483
00:24:53.640 --> 00:24:54.799
<v Speaker 1>in that situation? Right?

484
00:24:54.880 --> 00:24:55.079
<v Speaker 2>Right?

485
00:24:55.160 --> 00:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense? Yes, absolutely, okay, so then yeah, the

486
00:24:57.759 --> 00:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>logic here would be that if we could identify this

487
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>circumstances that produce the behavior and what outcomes reinforce that behavior,

488
00:25:04.920 --> 00:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, what were they trying to get

489
00:25:06.960 --> 00:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>out of that situation, then we could use those outcomes

490
00:25:10.240 --> 00:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're trying to get to to then reinforce a

491
00:25:13.400 --> 00:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>different type of behavior in that situation again, right, and

492
00:25:16.559 --> 00:25:19.079
<v Speaker 1>using an example I just gave. And we're jumping ahead

493
00:25:19.119 --> 00:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here because we'll be talking about this

494
00:25:20.680 --> 00:25:23.079
<v Speaker 1>in more detail, but using the example I just gave,

495
00:25:23.200 --> 00:25:25.319
<v Speaker 1>let's say that they're like, whenever they're asked to brush

496
00:25:25.359 --> 00:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>their teeth, they attack the staff, and that that's where

497
00:25:28.480 --> 00:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the problem exists. It seems like they're doing this because

498
00:25:31.000 --> 00:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>they want the staff to go away. What we'll do is, well, instead,

499
00:25:34.400 --> 00:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll teach them that when they ask you to do

500
00:25:36.759 --> 00:25:38.599
<v Speaker 1>something you don't want to do, you can say I

501
00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:40.799
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do that, and then the staff will

502
00:25:40.839 --> 00:25:43.400
<v Speaker 1>leave you alone. Yeah, And then that way you get

503
00:25:43.440 --> 00:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>what you want, which is they're not bothering you and

504
00:25:46.519 --> 00:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they get what they want, which is you're not attacking them,

505
00:25:49.240 --> 00:25:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and everybody wins. Like that's the sereo. And obviously there's

506
00:25:52.200 --> 00:25:53.279
<v Speaker 1>a whole solution of like, well, what do we do

507
00:25:53.319 --> 00:25:54.759
<v Speaker 1>about the brushing their teeth? We'll get to that, but

508
00:25:55.200 --> 00:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>not us. But like they're saying, like, we'll address that separately.

509
00:25:57.599 --> 00:25:59.279
<v Speaker 1>But the point being that, like, in this moment, what's

510
00:25:59.319 --> 00:26:02.599
<v Speaker 1>happening is they need something. They don't know how to

511
00:26:02.839 --> 00:26:04.839
<v Speaker 1>ask for what they need. What they know is if

512
00:26:04.880 --> 00:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I attack this person, I get what I need, right,

513
00:26:07.200 --> 00:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>And so we're teaching them, Okay, now that we know

514
00:26:09.400 --> 00:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>what you need, we can tell you to ask for that,

515
00:26:11.920 --> 00:26:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and then you don't have to attack. You can just

516
00:26:13.559 --> 00:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>get the thing that you need.

517
00:26:14.440 --> 00:26:14.559
<v Speaker 2>Right.

518
00:26:14.559 --> 00:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>That's essentially where we're going with it. But that's what

519
00:26:17.039 --> 00:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean by all that.

520
00:26:18.039 --> 00:26:21.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, absolutely, I think it's super helpful. So before

521
00:26:21.640 --> 00:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the modern version of functional analysis became popular and widely adopted,

522
00:26:26.319 --> 00:26:29.799
<v Speaker 2>another attempt was developed by other researchers around the same time,

523
00:26:29.880 --> 00:26:31.960
<v Speaker 2>but not quite the same time. Yeah, so car and

524
00:26:32.039 --> 00:26:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Durand in nineteen eighty five, really good year, and they

525
00:26:35.279 --> 00:26:38.000
<v Speaker 2>have bothesized that challenging behaviors such as eloping from the

526
00:26:38.039 --> 00:26:41.799
<v Speaker 2>learning environment and violence could be conceptualized as communication that

527
00:26:41.839 --> 00:26:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the student was communicating something about the situation they did

528
00:26:43.960 --> 00:26:46.880
<v Speaker 2>not like, and teaching an alternative way to ask to

529
00:26:46.920 --> 00:26:48.640
<v Speaker 2>get out of that situation. What allow us students to

530
00:26:48.680 --> 00:26:51.039
<v Speaker 2>get their needs met without running away or hurting other

531
00:26:51.079 --> 00:26:54.240
<v Speaker 2>people or themselves. So they basically said, these are things

532
00:26:54.279 --> 00:26:56.599
<v Speaker 2>that are happening. If we assume this is communication, then

533
00:26:56.640 --> 00:26:58.759
<v Speaker 2>they're communicating that there is something about the situation they

534
00:26:58.799 --> 00:27:00.720
<v Speaker 2>don't like. Let's teach them about way to get.

535
00:27:00.559 --> 00:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>That right exactly. Like I said, I jumped ahead a

536
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:04.599
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but that was essentially what I was trying

537
00:27:04.599 --> 00:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to come up with that example. But this is what

538
00:27:06.240 --> 00:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they did in that study, is they specifically did that

539
00:27:08.680 --> 00:27:12.039
<v Speaker 1>thing that conceptualized it that way. The behaviors that we

540
00:27:12.119 --> 00:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>observe that people see as like problematic are communication. They

541
00:27:16.039 --> 00:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to communicate what they need, and so

542
00:27:18.119 --> 00:27:20.599
<v Speaker 1>that's what they have developed. That's how they learned to

543
00:27:20.599 --> 00:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>communicate what they need is to do something in a

544
00:27:22.680 --> 00:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>way that was aggressive or they're running away or something.

545
00:27:25.240 --> 00:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>So they designed an assessment which in this part of

546
00:27:28.720 --> 00:27:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the study, this nineteen eighty five study and which they

547
00:27:31.279 --> 00:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>introduced tasks of varying levels of difficulty, hypothesizing that it

548
00:27:35.720 --> 00:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>was the difficulty of the task that was likely the

549
00:27:38.680 --> 00:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>situation that provoked those challenging behaviors. And what they saw

550
00:27:43.559 --> 00:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>was they were right. If there were tasks that were

551
00:27:45.720 --> 00:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>more difficult, those tended to more reliably provoke challenging behaviors.

552
00:27:49.400 --> 00:27:52.039
<v Speaker 1>The tasks that were easy did not. And so what

553
00:27:52.079 --> 00:27:55.279
<v Speaker 1>they did is they then taught the students to end

554
00:27:55.359 --> 00:27:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the task by asking to end the task by teaching

555
00:27:59.839 --> 00:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>them like, if this is too hard, you can say

556
00:28:02.240 --> 00:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I need help, or you can say I can't do

557
00:28:04.000 --> 00:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>this as too hard, whatever it was, they taught them

558
00:28:06.119 --> 00:28:09.319
<v Speaker 1>some way to request a way out of it or

559
00:28:09.359 --> 00:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to get through it more easily. And when they taught

560
00:28:12.000 --> 00:28:14.359
<v Speaker 1>them how to do this, this quickly resulted in zero

561
00:28:14.519 --> 00:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>or very low rates of those challenging behaviors and very

562
00:28:18.000 --> 00:28:22.039
<v Speaker 1>high rates of the students using their new communication skills

563
00:28:22.160 --> 00:28:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to ask for what they needed. Yeah, it worked like

564
00:28:24.200 --> 00:28:24.559
<v Speaker 1>a charm.

565
00:28:24.759 --> 00:28:26.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if I remember correctly, this is the one where

566
00:28:26.519 --> 00:28:29.400
<v Speaker 2>they did the easy thirty three difficult one hydred. Yeah,

567
00:28:29.480 --> 00:28:31.319
<v Speaker 2>that's the one. So for like to kind of like

568
00:28:31.359 --> 00:28:34.079
<v Speaker 2>get into like a little bit of detail on this. Basically,

569
00:28:34.119 --> 00:28:36.559
<v Speaker 2>they tested a couple different conditions. They tested that a

570
00:28:36.680 --> 00:28:38.920
<v Speaker 2>task was difficult, but that's the learner got a lot

571
00:28:38.960 --> 00:28:42.039
<v Speaker 2>of attention. The task was easy but they got less attention,

572
00:28:42.440 --> 00:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>or the task was easy and they got a lot

573
00:28:44.160 --> 00:28:47.319
<v Speaker 2>of attention. So they tested those three different situations, and

574
00:28:47.359 --> 00:28:49.599
<v Speaker 2>what they found was like some of the learners really

575
00:28:49.920 --> 00:28:51.720
<v Speaker 2>just wanted to have a lot of attention, some of

576
00:28:51.759 --> 00:28:53.880
<v Speaker 2>them really wanted to get away from the task. And

577
00:28:53.880 --> 00:28:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that was really the two big findings they found out

578
00:28:55.960 --> 00:28:57.599
<v Speaker 2>of I think they had six participants in it or

579
00:28:57.640 --> 00:28:58.279
<v Speaker 2>something like that.

580
00:28:58.400 --> 00:28:59.359
<v Speaker 1>This sounds right, yeah, but it was.

581
00:28:59.440 --> 00:29:01.119
<v Speaker 2>It was really cool, and I was like when I

582
00:29:01.119 --> 00:29:03.400
<v Speaker 2>first learned about this, I was like I'd already learned

583
00:29:03.400 --> 00:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>about the other assessment that we're going to talk about,

584
00:29:06.240 --> 00:29:08.960
<v Speaker 2>the other the gold standard, if you will. I didn't

585
00:29:08.960 --> 00:29:11.079
<v Speaker 2>know about this one first, you know, like I didn't

586
00:29:11.119 --> 00:29:12.480
<v Speaker 2>know like that this was already done. So it was

587
00:29:12.519 --> 00:29:14.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of a like I say, already done. I didn't

588
00:29:14.759 --> 00:29:17.279
<v Speaker 2>know that this was like in the works or around

589
00:29:17.279 --> 00:29:18.440
<v Speaker 2>at the time too. Yeah.

590
00:29:18.519 --> 00:29:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the actual we're getting into like the actual study,

591
00:29:22.279 --> 00:29:23.799
<v Speaker 1>but at the time, there were kind of people who

592
00:29:23.839 --> 00:29:27.359
<v Speaker 1>were trying different things, because again, the hypothesis was out there,

593
00:29:27.400 --> 00:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea was out there. They're like, what we can

594
00:29:29.920 --> 00:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>do is assess what these people need and address it

595
00:29:34.519 --> 00:29:36.839
<v Speaker 1>from that direction rather than just say, let's just use

596
00:29:36.880 --> 00:29:38.519
<v Speaker 1>reward and punishment to get what we want. We can

597
00:29:38.559 --> 00:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>figure out what these people need, and then we can

598
00:29:40.799 --> 00:29:43.039
<v Speaker 1>use that to help teach them whatever might need to

599
00:29:43.079 --> 00:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>be taught, yeah, to help address it. And so there

600
00:29:45.200 --> 00:29:47.119
<v Speaker 1>were a couple different ways to approach it. This study

601
00:29:47.160 --> 00:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was one of the big ones. That's why I wanted

602
00:29:48.400 --> 00:29:50.079
<v Speaker 1>to include it because I actually think it's one that

603
00:29:50.279 --> 00:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>is often not known by many students of behavior analysis.

604
00:29:54.160 --> 00:29:55.759
<v Speaker 1>They just learned about sort of what we're going to

605
00:29:55.759 --> 00:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about is what is considered now the gold standard FA.

606
00:29:58.440 --> 00:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But there were other attempts to tell like, figure these

607
00:30:00.720 --> 00:30:03.079
<v Speaker 1>things out, and this was one of the early ones too,

608
00:30:03.319 --> 00:30:06.039
<v Speaker 1>that was right around a similar time. Yeah, yeah, absolutely

609
00:30:06.160 --> 00:30:09.319
<v Speaker 1>separately and published a couple of years before that, car

610
00:30:09.319 --> 00:30:12.599
<v Speaker 1>and Durand eighteen eighty five study what would become what

611
00:30:12.759 --> 00:30:16.359
<v Speaker 1>is widely considered this gold standard of assessments was born,

612
00:30:16.559 --> 00:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and this was a WATA Slipher, Bowman and Richmond in

613
00:30:19.720 --> 00:30:23.119
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty two published their study which they published in

614
00:30:23.160 --> 00:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>which they demonstrated an assessment strategy for determining why those

615
00:30:27.039 --> 00:30:29.799
<v Speaker 1>challenging behaviors occurred in a kind of similar way to

616
00:30:29.880 --> 00:30:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the car and durand but with some fundamental differences will unpack.

617
00:30:33.079 --> 00:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And this was called Toward a Functional Analysis of Self Injury,

618
00:30:37.119 --> 00:30:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and this was published in nineteen eighty two in the

619
00:30:39.200 --> 00:30:43.319
<v Speaker 1>journal Analysis and Intervention and Developmental Disabilities. That was where

620
00:30:43.319 --> 00:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it was first published.

621
00:30:44.720 --> 00:30:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there are a number of people with little

622
00:30:47.400 --> 00:30:50.160
<v Speaker 2>or no language and caught in disabilities that self harm

623
00:30:50.319 --> 00:30:52.920
<v Speaker 2>at pretty high rates and pretty dangerous rates too, and

624
00:30:53.000 --> 00:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>usually in the form of hitting or binding themselves or

625
00:30:55.000 --> 00:30:57.960
<v Speaker 2>hitting their body parts, commonly their head against hard services.

626
00:30:58.119 --> 00:31:00.359
<v Speaker 2>I am almost positive that you have worked with folks

627
00:31:00.400 --> 00:31:02.160
<v Speaker 2>that do this. I know for a fact that I've

628
00:31:02.160 --> 00:31:03.559
<v Speaker 2>worked with lots of folks that do this. They have

629
00:31:03.599 --> 00:31:08.200
<v Speaker 2>lots of scarring and callouses and head injuries and protective equipment,

630
00:31:08.359 --> 00:31:11.480
<v Speaker 2>and it is it is never easy to see when

631
00:31:11.480 --> 00:31:13.319
<v Speaker 2>it happens, even when you get used to it. It

632
00:31:13.359 --> 00:31:15.640
<v Speaker 2>is never easy to watch somebody do this, and so

633
00:31:15.680 --> 00:31:18.119
<v Speaker 2>it's hardy is Yeah, it's hard to watch. It's hard

634
00:31:18.160 --> 00:31:21.319
<v Speaker 2>to intervene on sometimes it is it can be scary.

635
00:31:21.400 --> 00:31:23.960
<v Speaker 2>It's scary, that's it. Yeah, exactly, it's scary and you

636
00:31:23.960 --> 00:31:26.519
<v Speaker 2>get elevated. It's it's a very difficult thing to be around.

637
00:31:27.039 --> 00:31:30.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and like, and these are often people who live

638
00:31:30.079 --> 00:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with families who also don't know how to support them,

639
00:31:31.720 --> 00:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're like just doing their best to try and

640
00:31:33.680 --> 00:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>prevent these types of behaviors from occurring. But that means

641
00:31:36.880 --> 00:31:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that oftentimes they would bring them to some of these clinics.

642
00:31:39.359 --> 00:31:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And so they designed the study to figure out, Okay,

643
00:31:41.599 --> 00:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>let's see if we can understand why they're doing this

644
00:31:44.559 --> 00:31:47.559
<v Speaker 1>thing and address it that way, right, and rather than

645
00:31:47.759 --> 00:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like just tying their arms to their back so they

646
00:31:51.440 --> 00:31:55.039
<v Speaker 1>can't move, or rather than sedating them with medication, or

647
00:31:55.079 --> 00:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>rather than just using a bunch of punishments or something like,

648
00:31:57.480 --> 00:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say, if we can understand what's going on here,

649
00:31:59.200 --> 00:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>so that the context is like, that is a thing

650
00:32:01.880 --> 00:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that happens for some people who have disabilities, that is,

651
00:32:04.680 --> 00:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they do develop those types of behaviors. And then

652
00:32:09.119 --> 00:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>there was now this new approach to try and understand

653
00:32:11.319 --> 00:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what was going on here. So the general logic of

654
00:32:13.720 --> 00:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the assessment was that they could determine whether self harming

655
00:32:16.759 --> 00:32:20.079
<v Speaker 1>behaviors of these nine individuals in their study, the nine

656
00:32:20.079 --> 00:32:23.799
<v Speaker 1>individuals with cognitive disabilities and little or no language, if

657
00:32:23.880 --> 00:32:26.759
<v Speaker 1>those behaviors of self harm were more likely to occur

658
00:32:26.839 --> 00:32:31.319
<v Speaker 1>when there was either positive reinforcement or negative reinforcement, or

659
00:32:31.400 --> 00:32:35.119
<v Speaker 1>whether those behaviors occurred regardless of whether there was positive

660
00:32:35.160 --> 00:32:36.599
<v Speaker 1>or negative or any reinforcement.

661
00:32:37.000 --> 00:32:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, positive reinforcement was conceptualized as in this assessment

662
00:32:40.599 --> 00:32:43.000
<v Speaker 2>social attention. Do they harm the selves when they were

663
00:32:43.000 --> 00:32:46.440
<v Speaker 2>receiving little attention or no attention? And what providing attention

664
00:32:46.559 --> 00:32:49.000
<v Speaker 2>increase the likelihood that they continue to hurt themselves. So

665
00:32:49.039 --> 00:32:51.240
<v Speaker 2>basically it would set up that they would get no

666
00:32:51.319 --> 00:32:53.680
<v Speaker 2>attention or little attention. And when we say little attention,

667
00:32:53.839 --> 00:32:55.319
<v Speaker 2>when we say no attention, we don't mean like they

668
00:32:55.319 --> 00:32:57.599
<v Speaker 2>were completely ignored. We mean like that the attention wasn't

669
00:32:57.640 --> 00:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>very rich, it was very quiet, like the person that

670
00:33:00.000 --> 00:33:03.359
<v Speaker 2>they were interacting with us maybe distracted. Yeah, the selfagury's

671
00:33:03.400 --> 00:33:04.960
<v Speaker 2>behavior would occur, and then when it would occur, they

672
00:33:04.960 --> 00:33:07.400
<v Speaker 2>would deliver the attention to assess whether or not they

673
00:33:07.400 --> 00:33:10.119
<v Speaker 2>had influence on the behavior, and so what they were

674
00:33:10.119 --> 00:33:13.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to discover was if those were related, then social

675
00:33:13.680 --> 00:33:15.960
<v Speaker 2>attention could be the outcome that they are trying to

676
00:33:16.000 --> 00:33:17.200
<v Speaker 2>get by hurting themselves.

677
00:33:17.480 --> 00:33:20.119
<v Speaker 1>And what we'll describe each of these conditions in more detail,

678
00:33:20.279 --> 00:33:23.279
<v Speaker 1>like how they're arranged and all the features of like

679
00:33:23.319 --> 00:33:25.839
<v Speaker 1>what this experiment looked like. But yeah, the idea was like,

680
00:33:25.880 --> 00:33:28.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, if we are with them and we remove

681
00:33:28.839 --> 00:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>our attention from them, do we see that they now

682
00:33:33.200 --> 00:33:36.079
<v Speaker 1>are doing this more often because when they do it,

683
00:33:36.119 --> 00:33:38.039
<v Speaker 1>we then do pay attention to them, like is this

684
00:33:38.079 --> 00:33:41.319
<v Speaker 1>attention seeking behavior? And so we're just going to systematically

685
00:33:41.319 --> 00:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>do this repeatedly so we can see if every time

686
00:33:44.400 --> 00:33:46.519
<v Speaker 1>we remove our attention they do this, they get our attention,

687
00:33:46.960 --> 00:33:49.079
<v Speaker 1>and they're now more likely to do this. They essentially

688
00:33:49.079 --> 00:33:51.839
<v Speaker 1>have learned, like they're showing us like that's what I'm

689
00:33:51.880 --> 00:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to get at here, is I just want your attention, right?

690
00:33:54.279 --> 00:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That could be a thing that was one of their ideas.

691
00:33:56.240 --> 00:33:58.039
<v Speaker 1>So that was the first piece of this. The next

692
00:33:58.039 --> 00:34:01.759
<v Speaker 1>one is the negative reinforcement condition, and this was conceptualized

693
00:34:01.839 --> 00:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as terminating task requirements or demands. So did they observe like,

694
00:34:07.880 --> 00:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was it the case that these individuals would harm themselves

695
00:34:10.800 --> 00:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>if and when they were asked to perform tasks, so

696
00:34:13.519 --> 00:34:17.519
<v Speaker 1>certain tasks, and if so, then if you terminated the

697
00:34:17.599 --> 00:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>task request, if you removed those demands, would that increase

698
00:34:22.000 --> 00:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the likelihood that they were going to harm themselves? And

699
00:34:24.480 --> 00:34:31.639
<v Speaker 1>if so, then the removal of demands like taking away requests,

700
00:34:31.639 --> 00:34:34.679
<v Speaker 1>stopping asking them to do things, that could be the

701
00:34:34.719 --> 00:34:37.679
<v Speaker 1>outcome that these individuals are trying to achieve when they

702
00:34:37.760 --> 00:34:40.119
<v Speaker 1>hurt themselves and they're like, I just I don't like

703
00:34:40.159 --> 00:34:42.159
<v Speaker 1>it when you make me do these things. I don't

704
00:34:42.199 --> 00:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>know how to communicate that any other way. So when

705
00:34:44.400 --> 00:34:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you asked me to do them, I hurt myself. And

706
00:34:47.760 --> 00:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>if you stop asking me, then I will stop hurting myself.

707
00:34:50.880 --> 00:34:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's like I will hurt myself until you

708
00:34:52.800 --> 00:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>go away, until it makes this go away, right, And

709
00:34:55.280 --> 00:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so that was essentially what they wanted to assess here

710
00:34:58.000 --> 00:35:00.679
<v Speaker 1>in the negative reinforcement condition. That was the concept spetualization

711
00:35:00.880 --> 00:35:02.599
<v Speaker 1>of that part of their study.

712
00:35:02.960 --> 00:35:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So a really good example of this would be

713
00:35:04.920 --> 00:35:08.119
<v Speaker 2>something like you're listening to a podcast, you're listening to

714
00:35:08.199 --> 00:35:11.800
<v Speaker 2>it on normal speed. We present an ad. You might

715
00:35:11.880 --> 00:35:14.199
<v Speaker 2>yell and scream, and then we take away the ad

716
00:35:14.679 --> 00:35:16.360
<v Speaker 2>that might be an arrangement that we might look at

717
00:35:16.480 --> 00:35:16.840
<v Speaker 2>for that.

718
00:35:16.760 --> 00:35:18.320
<v Speaker 1>And now you're more likely to yell and scream when

719
00:35:18.400 --> 00:35:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we say that we're going to play an ad exactly.

720
00:35:27.840 --> 00:35:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we're talking about the way that this experiment

721
00:35:31.000 --> 00:35:33.360
<v Speaker 2>was kind of arranged. We've talked about how positive and

722
00:35:33.360 --> 00:35:36.760
<v Speaker 2>negative reinforcement were conceptualized in this and we mentioned earlier

723
00:35:36.800 --> 00:35:39.320
<v Speaker 2>that they were trying to evaluate the positive reinforcement contingency,

724
00:35:39.360 --> 00:35:42.920
<v Speaker 2>the negative reinforcement contingency, and also whether the behavior occurred

725
00:35:42.960 --> 00:35:44.960
<v Speaker 2>regardless of the type of reinforcement that was delivered by

726
00:35:44.960 --> 00:35:47.360
<v Speaker 2>somebody else. That brings us to the other condition that

727
00:35:47.360 --> 00:35:49.719
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at. And there was another condition in which

728
00:35:49.719 --> 00:35:54.039
<v Speaker 2>the experiments experimenters simply interacted in a mild, gentle condition,

729
00:35:54.199 --> 00:35:57.360
<v Speaker 2>and they called it the play condition. Individuals weren't asked

730
00:35:57.400 --> 00:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>to perform any tasks. Attention was freely given. If self

731
00:36:00.480 --> 00:36:02.639
<v Speaker 2>harm occurred in this context, it might be that they

732
00:36:02.719 --> 00:36:07.159
<v Speaker 2>hurt themselves because of something called automatic reinforcement or reinforcement

733
00:36:07.199 --> 00:36:09.800
<v Speaker 2>that the person delivers themselves. Right, it simply means that

734
00:36:09.840 --> 00:36:13.440
<v Speaker 2>there's something about performing the behavior itself that was inherently

735
00:36:13.519 --> 00:36:16.760
<v Speaker 2>reinforcing to the individual. Could be sensory stimulation that is

736
00:36:16.760 --> 00:36:19.360
<v Speaker 2>produced by the behavior or whatever it is. It's basically

737
00:36:19.400 --> 00:36:23.559
<v Speaker 2>like the learner engaged in the behavior, that behavior produces

738
00:36:23.599 --> 00:36:26.360
<v Speaker 2>some outcome that is not delivered by somebody else, and

739
00:36:26.400 --> 00:36:29.239
<v Speaker 2>there's some sensation about that behavior that is produced that

740
00:36:29.480 --> 00:36:31.960
<v Speaker 2>maintains the behavior. So it's kind of like, for those

741
00:36:32.000 --> 00:36:34.159
<v Speaker 2>of you who aren't watching this, I generally kind of

742
00:36:34.199 --> 00:36:37.159
<v Speaker 2>rock back and forth while I'm talking, and that's in

743
00:36:37.159 --> 00:36:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the absence of any context. I'd be doing this if

744
00:36:39.000 --> 00:36:41.079
<v Speaker 2>I was working, or if I was recording a podcast

745
00:36:41.159 --> 00:36:43.039
<v Speaker 2>or anything with Abraham, I just kind of do that

746
00:36:43.039 --> 00:36:44.960
<v Speaker 2>because I like the way it feels right, And that's

747
00:36:45.000 --> 00:36:46.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of like what that kind of circumstance might look

748
00:36:46.920 --> 00:36:47.880
<v Speaker 2>like perfect.

749
00:36:48.079 --> 00:36:50.599
<v Speaker 1>Such, yeah, very good example that's exactly right. Is like

750
00:36:50.639 --> 00:36:54.519
<v Speaker 1>there's something about the action itself that the experience of

751
00:36:54.559 --> 00:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that maintains the action that it's like, nobody around you

752
00:36:57.480 --> 00:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>doing things has anything to do with the reasons to

753
00:37:00.280 --> 00:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>do that, and so they needed to include a condition

754
00:37:02.920 --> 00:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially determine if that was the case for

755
00:37:05.800 --> 00:37:08.159
<v Speaker 1>any of these individuals. Is like, they're going to do

756
00:37:08.199 --> 00:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it no matter what we're doing. They're just they're going

757
00:37:10.000 --> 00:37:12.639
<v Speaker 1>to do it, and that could mean that there's something

758
00:37:12.639 --> 00:37:15.519
<v Speaker 1>about that action itself that is not related to what

759
00:37:15.559 --> 00:37:18.159
<v Speaker 1>we're doing, but something they're getting out of it. Right

760
00:37:18.400 --> 00:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>now in the experiment, the way the arrangement looks like,

761
00:37:21.440 --> 00:37:23.119
<v Speaker 1>what will describe it, go ahead, like in detail here

762
00:37:23.119 --> 00:37:26.599
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. A single individual, one of these individuals

763
00:37:26.679 --> 00:37:29.519
<v Speaker 1>is in a room with a single experimenter, sometimes called

764
00:37:29.559 --> 00:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a therapist sometimes I don't know, but yeah, I'm going

765
00:37:33.039 --> 00:37:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to just call them an experimenter. They're just like a

766
00:37:35.280 --> 00:37:37.519
<v Speaker 1>person who's in the room who's like the person who's

767
00:37:37.559 --> 00:37:40.760
<v Speaker 1>there to change the circumstances to see what's going on

768
00:37:41.280 --> 00:37:44.119
<v Speaker 1>with those behaviors. So anyway, there's a single there's one

769
00:37:44.159 --> 00:37:47.039
<v Speaker 1>person who has these self harm behaviors, there's one other

770
00:37:47.079 --> 00:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>person in the room who's this experimenter, and the experimenter

771
00:37:49.960 --> 00:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>would implement one of the conditions that we just listed.

772
00:37:52.960 --> 00:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>There's the social attention one, that toy play one, the

773
00:37:56.559 --> 00:38:00.840
<v Speaker 1>demand one, or an alone condition, and we'll get into

774
00:38:00.840 --> 00:38:03.679
<v Speaker 1>more about what that looks like here in a second. Now,

775
00:38:03.920 --> 00:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of each of these conditions, the experimental

776
00:38:07.000 --> 00:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>would enter the room with the individual and they would

777
00:38:09.039 --> 00:38:14.239
<v Speaker 1>establish some scenario that could potentially evoke that problematic behavior,

778
00:38:14.239 --> 00:38:16.559
<v Speaker 1>whatever the self harm behavior they were sort of on

779
00:38:16.599 --> 00:38:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the lookout for might be. Each of these sessions lasted

780
00:38:20.239 --> 00:38:24.159
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes, and in those fifteen minutes they were divided

781
00:38:24.199 --> 00:38:29.079
<v Speaker 1>into ten second intervals, and observers who were usually watching

782
00:38:29.639 --> 00:38:32.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe from across the room, maybe behind some like mirrored

783
00:38:32.840 --> 00:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>glass of some sort, they would watch and record whether

784
00:38:36.039 --> 00:38:39.800
<v Speaker 1>any self harm behaviors occurred within a given ten second interval,

785
00:38:39.800 --> 00:38:42.519
<v Speaker 1>because again we had fifteen minutes. The entire thing is

786
00:38:42.559 --> 00:38:45.320
<v Speaker 1>broken into ten second intervals, and they would just mark

787
00:38:45.400 --> 00:38:48.519
<v Speaker 1>down if during this interval the behavior occurred, check that

788
00:38:48.599 --> 00:38:50.519
<v Speaker 1>box and say, okay, that's it. And then at the

789
00:38:50.639 --> 00:38:52.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the fifteen minutes, what they would do is

790
00:38:52.800 --> 00:38:57.079
<v Speaker 1>they would report what percentage of the intervals had instances

791
00:38:57.440 --> 00:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of those self harm behaviors. So there's watching, and ever

792
00:39:00.000 --> 00:39:02.559
<v Speaker 1>ever retirement occurs, they would check that box or whatever,

793
00:39:02.719 --> 00:39:04.079
<v Speaker 1>and at the end they look and see, all, right,

794
00:39:04.079 --> 00:39:06.639
<v Speaker 1>out of all the boxes that we have, how many

795
00:39:06.679 --> 00:39:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of them had self harm occur And that was the

796
00:39:09.719 --> 00:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>percentage of those intervals. That was how they measured this

797
00:39:12.079 --> 00:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in this study.

798
00:39:13.440 --> 00:39:17.199
<v Speaker 2>Right now, in the attention condition, which they called social disapproval.

799
00:39:17.400 --> 00:39:20.599
<v Speaker 2>In this situation. This was what they called the positive

800
00:39:20.599 --> 00:39:23.360
<v Speaker 2>reinforcement condition, and so they would enter the room and

801
00:39:23.400 --> 00:39:26.119
<v Speaker 2>engage with some of the toys briefly. Then the experimenter

802
00:39:26.119 --> 00:39:28.039
<v Speaker 2>would say something like I have to do some work,

803
00:39:28.239 --> 00:39:29.800
<v Speaker 2>or like they would pretend to be busy, I have

804
00:39:29.840 --> 00:39:31.719
<v Speaker 2>to take a call. This is in the eighties, so

805
00:39:31.760 --> 00:39:33.719
<v Speaker 2>maybe they weren't taking a call, but like, now you go,

806
00:39:33.800 --> 00:39:35.119
<v Speaker 2>I have to take a call and pretend to be

807
00:39:35.199 --> 00:39:36.840
<v Speaker 2>on your cell phone, right, yeah, But they would say

808
00:39:36.840 --> 00:39:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I have to do some work, and they would start

809
00:39:38.559 --> 00:39:41.159
<v Speaker 2>reading something like a newspaper or a book. And if

810
00:39:41.159 --> 00:39:44.559
<v Speaker 2>the individual hurt themselves or engage in the behavior itself,

811
00:39:44.880 --> 00:39:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the experimenter would react with a disapproving statement, something like

812
00:39:48.280 --> 00:39:51.559
<v Speaker 2>don't hurt yourself, or don't do that, or stop it,

813
00:39:51.679 --> 00:39:54.039
<v Speaker 2>you know, something along those lines. Not yelling, but like

814
00:39:54.039 --> 00:39:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a disapproving statement, right, And this would be an attempt

815
00:39:56.480 --> 00:39:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to replicate the ways that staff might interact with them

816
00:39:58.760 --> 00:40:01.199
<v Speaker 2>in their daily environment. It has a quick reminder when

817
00:40:01.199 --> 00:40:03.760
<v Speaker 2>we say the word positive our behavior analyst friends, we

818
00:40:03.800 --> 00:40:05.360
<v Speaker 2>all know this, but if you're listening and you're not

819
00:40:05.400 --> 00:40:07.159
<v Speaker 2>a behavior analyst, and you hear the word positive, and

820
00:40:07.159 --> 00:40:08.800
<v Speaker 2>you think that means good, That's not what we're saying.

821
00:40:09.079 --> 00:40:12.880
<v Speaker 2>In this context, positive only means that something has added

822
00:40:13.000 --> 00:40:16.280
<v Speaker 2>after the behavior occurs. In reinforcement, it means that the

823
00:40:16.280 --> 00:40:19.559
<v Speaker 2>behavior increases in frequency. So positive reinforcement is something is

824
00:40:19.599 --> 00:40:21.880
<v Speaker 2>added behavior increases in frequency over time.

825
00:40:22.360 --> 00:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so in this case, what's added is some

826
00:40:24.400 --> 00:40:27.119
<v Speaker 1>form of attention. Yeah, it is social disapproval. But like

827
00:40:27.360 --> 00:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's disapproval doesn't make a negative. It's

828
00:40:29.880 --> 00:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>still something that is added afterward, and so therefore it

829
00:40:33.960 --> 00:40:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is positive. And if that behavior increases, then that's called reinforcement.

830
00:40:36.960 --> 00:40:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's just to make sure people are clear on that. Yeah,

831
00:40:39.519 --> 00:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that was the attention also called social disapproval condition. The

832
00:40:43.000 --> 00:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>other one was that negative reinforcement condition, which is also

833
00:40:45.840 --> 00:40:48.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes called the demand condition. And in this one, the

834
00:40:48.800 --> 00:40:51.320
<v Speaker 1>experimenter and the individual enter the room and they'll start

835
00:40:51.360 --> 00:40:54.639
<v Speaker 1>performing academic tasks of some sort. Maybe it could be chores.

836
00:40:54.679 --> 00:40:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I've also seen that done in some iterations, but I

837
00:40:56.800 --> 00:41:00.199
<v Speaker 1>believe in this experiment it was academic tasks. And if

838
00:41:00.199 --> 00:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the individual self harm to any point during those instructions,

839
00:41:04.320 --> 00:41:08.119
<v Speaker 1>then the experimenter would immediately stop requesting the performance. Of

840
00:41:08.199 --> 00:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>those tasks and they would turn their attention away from

841
00:41:10.960 --> 00:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the individual. Right. So, essentially they're saying, like, if a

842
00:41:13.960 --> 00:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that provokes self harm is us asking to do something,

843
00:41:17.480 --> 00:41:22.079
<v Speaker 1>then us taking away that request should be a reinforcer,

844
00:41:22.239 --> 00:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a negative reinforcer for that behavior, which means it would

845
00:41:25.920 --> 00:41:29.519
<v Speaker 1>increase the likelihood. So again, with negative this only means

846
00:41:29.880 --> 00:41:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in behavioral terms, that something was taken away. In this case,

847
00:41:33.440 --> 00:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the performance tasks, the requests were what was taken away.

848
00:41:36.880 --> 00:41:40.039
<v Speaker 1>They were there before the behavior occurs. We took away

849
00:41:40.039 --> 00:41:44.519
<v Speaker 1>the thing we didn't like, and this is then reinforcement. Again,

850
00:41:44.679 --> 00:41:48.239
<v Speaker 1>if the behavior increases in frequency, reinforcement always means the

851
00:41:48.239 --> 00:41:51.119
<v Speaker 1>behavior increases in frequency, regardless of whether it's positive or negative.

852
00:41:51.599 --> 00:41:54.639
<v Speaker 1>And so as an outcome of terminating those requests, are

853
00:41:54.679 --> 00:41:57.800
<v Speaker 1>they more likely to self harm in the presence of requests?

854
00:41:57.840 --> 00:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>If so, that would tell us that what they don't

855
00:41:59.920 --> 00:42:03.119
<v Speaker 1>like is being asked to do these specific tasks, and

856
00:42:03.159 --> 00:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason they're doing them is because when they do them,

857
00:42:05.960 --> 00:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it gets them out of doing those tasks.

858
00:42:08.320 --> 00:42:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Right. That's like the example of the toothbrushing earlier. Yeah,

859
00:42:10.880 --> 00:42:12.960
<v Speaker 2>like staff ask the client to brush their teeth, they

860
00:42:12.960 --> 00:42:15.320
<v Speaker 2>start engaging in self harm, you remove the task, Hey,

861
00:42:15.360 --> 00:42:17.119
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to brush your teeth. That's it, that's done,

862
00:42:17.440 --> 00:42:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and then they stop harming. That is essentially what happens.

863
00:42:20.960 --> 00:42:24.639
<v Speaker 2>The task is aversive negative reinforcement. We remove that aversive,

864
00:42:25.000 --> 00:42:25.639
<v Speaker 2>they get relief.

865
00:42:25.719 --> 00:42:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's relief, and they're now more likely to self

866
00:42:28.320 --> 00:42:30.159
<v Speaker 1>harm when you ask to brush their teeth because they've

867
00:42:30.159 --> 00:42:32.800
<v Speaker 1>now learned that that specific thing they do gets them

868
00:42:32.800 --> 00:42:35.800
<v Speaker 1>out of the task, right bingo. And so we see

869
00:42:35.800 --> 00:42:40.199
<v Speaker 1>an increase in frequency the self harm because it removes

870
00:42:40.280 --> 00:42:42.639
<v Speaker 1>an aversive situation, which in this case is the request

871
00:42:42.679 --> 00:42:43.519
<v Speaker 1>to perform something.

872
00:42:44.159 --> 00:42:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly now. In the unstructured play condition we talked about,

873
00:42:48.000 --> 00:42:49.880
<v Speaker 2>where it's like toy play and stuff like this, there

874
00:42:49.880 --> 00:42:51.480
<v Speaker 2>are a variety of toys on the floor and the

875
00:42:51.480 --> 00:42:54.760
<v Speaker 2>experimenter would simply spend time with the individual, following their lead,

876
00:42:55.119 --> 00:42:57.639
<v Speaker 2>asking them for nothing, but would comment on their play

877
00:42:57.760 --> 00:43:00.199
<v Speaker 2>in a neutral or gently encouraging manner. And this I

878
00:43:00.239 --> 00:43:01.639
<v Speaker 2>think one of the things that we talk about and

879
00:43:01.679 --> 00:43:03.880
<v Speaker 2>you'll see kind of like today, one of the things

880
00:43:03.880 --> 00:43:06.079
<v Speaker 2>that we're taught is that we don't ask them questions

881
00:43:06.679 --> 00:43:08.960
<v Speaker 2>during this correct it's very much so I like the

882
00:43:09.000 --> 00:43:10.920
<v Speaker 2>way you're playing with that that looks like a lot

883
00:43:10.960 --> 00:43:13.079
<v Speaker 2>of fun. It's like you're making statements about what they're doing,

884
00:43:13.079 --> 00:43:15.800
<v Speaker 2>because asking them questions could be considered demand.

885
00:43:16.239 --> 00:43:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right. Yeah, the whole point is to try and

886
00:43:18.800 --> 00:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>make it as neutral as possible. Yes, Like you're just there.

887
00:43:22.679 --> 00:43:25.679
<v Speaker 1>You're not withholding your attention, you're not giving it dependent

888
00:43:25.760 --> 00:43:29.199
<v Speaker 1>on anything. You're not asking them anything or asking them

889
00:43:29.239 --> 00:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to do anything. You're just there to sort of follow

890
00:43:33.000 --> 00:43:35.599
<v Speaker 1>their lead. Make it just the most comfortable you can

891
00:43:35.760 --> 00:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for them, where it's just chill, chill vibes all around.

892
00:43:39.239 --> 00:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>What is the goals called the chill vibes conditions?

893
00:43:42.199 --> 00:43:43.719
<v Speaker 2>That's what it should be called now.

894
00:43:45.159 --> 00:43:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right. So again the point here is that if

895
00:43:48.159 --> 00:43:51.639
<v Speaker 1>those self hard behaviors occur more during any one of

896
00:43:51.679 --> 00:43:54.639
<v Speaker 1>those conditions, particularly we think of like the social disapproval,

897
00:43:54.679 --> 00:43:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the positive reinforcement, or the demands like removal of task

898
00:43:58.880 --> 00:44:02.400
<v Speaker 1>requests that can, then that would suggest that the condition

899
00:44:02.559 --> 00:44:05.559
<v Speaker 1>was likely the thing that was provoking that challenging behavior,

900
00:44:06.000 --> 00:44:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and the type of outcome associated with that condition was

901
00:44:08.840 --> 00:44:11.760
<v Speaker 1>likely the kind of reward, the kind of outcome, the

902
00:44:11.840 --> 00:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of reinforcement that the individual was seeking in those situations.

903
00:44:16.400 --> 00:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense.

904
00:44:17.440 --> 00:44:18.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes perfect sense.

905
00:44:18.760 --> 00:44:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Like skipping through ads, you're seeking to get rid of them.

906
00:44:23.880 --> 00:44:33.639
<v Speaker 1>So here's your chance. Okay, we're back. We've essentially been

907
00:44:33.679 --> 00:44:38.280
<v Speaker 1>describing in detail the different conditions of the experimental functional

908
00:44:38.280 --> 00:44:41.639
<v Speaker 1>analysis in this nineteen eighty two study, and also the

909
00:44:41.639 --> 00:44:44.760
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of what those results might mean as far as

910
00:44:44.920 --> 00:44:46.559
<v Speaker 1>understanding the behaviors when they occur.

911
00:44:47.000 --> 00:44:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Right, So in this experiment, they also had another condition

912
00:44:50.280 --> 00:44:52.320
<v Speaker 2>in which the individual was left alone in a room

913
00:44:52.480 --> 00:44:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and observe for fifty minutes to determine whether the self

914
00:44:54.880 --> 00:44:58.880
<v Speaker 2>harm behaviors occurred in the absence of any provocative or

915
00:44:58.880 --> 00:45:03.280
<v Speaker 2>consequential conditions. This could suggest that the automatic reinforcement that

916
00:45:03.280 --> 00:45:04.960
<v Speaker 2>behavior was occurring. So, like what we mean by that

917
00:45:05.079 --> 00:45:07.320
<v Speaker 2>is is there was nothing to do. There were no demands,

918
00:45:07.320 --> 00:45:09.840
<v Speaker 2>there was no task, but there was nothing enriching either,

919
00:45:09.920 --> 00:45:11.800
<v Speaker 2>so there was no attention, there was no staff. It

920
00:45:11.840 --> 00:45:14.079
<v Speaker 2>was kind of just like a when you are left

921
00:45:14.119 --> 00:45:16.639
<v Speaker 2>to your own device, is what happens? Yeah, And essentially

922
00:45:16.719 --> 00:45:18.840
<v Speaker 2>that's what they're trying to test. And so we also

923
00:45:18.960 --> 00:45:21.119
<v Speaker 2>call this the we don't really know what's going on,

924
00:45:21.239 --> 00:45:22.920
<v Speaker 2>but it doesn't seem to be related to anything we

925
00:45:22.960 --> 00:45:27.280
<v Speaker 2>are doing reinforcement, meaning that like everything that we're delivering

926
00:45:27.320 --> 00:45:29.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem to have an influence or impact on this behavior,

927
00:45:29.880 --> 00:45:31.599
<v Speaker 2>there's got to be something else that we just all

928
00:45:31.639 --> 00:45:32.079
<v Speaker 2>know about.

929
00:45:32.800 --> 00:45:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So essentially you can imagine if it was the

930
00:45:36.119 --> 00:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>case that this was sensory, like self stimulatory in some way,

931
00:45:39.079 --> 00:45:41.559
<v Speaker 1>or there was something about it that the individual is

932
00:45:41.599 --> 00:45:43.400
<v Speaker 1>getting out of it that was unrelated to what the

933
00:45:43.440 --> 00:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>experimenter was doing, you would likely see this. The self

934
00:45:46.880 --> 00:45:50.159
<v Speaker 1>harm behaviors occur when there's positive reinforcement, when there's negative reinforcement,

935
00:45:50.199 --> 00:45:53.239
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing with toys, and when you're left by yourself. Now,

936
00:45:53.239 --> 00:45:56.599
<v Speaker 1>it is possible that the toy play condition would be

937
00:45:56.679 --> 00:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>enough of a distraction that you would see less of

938
00:45:59.440 --> 00:46:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the behavior of her in that situation and still walk

939
00:46:01.960 --> 00:46:05.679
<v Speaker 1>away with the interpretation that there was something sensory, self stimulatory,

940
00:46:05.760 --> 00:46:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise not socially mediated and therefore what you might

941
00:46:09.280 --> 00:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>call automatic reinforcement about what was going on for that individual.

942
00:46:13.000 --> 00:46:15.599
<v Speaker 1>But if you only saw it in the conditions where

943
00:46:15.599 --> 00:46:18.800
<v Speaker 1>there was social interactions happening, particularly if they were primarily

944
00:46:18.800 --> 00:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in just the social positive reinforcement or the negative reinforcement.

945
00:46:23.079 --> 00:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>That gave a fairly clear, differentiated picture of what could

946
00:46:26.920 --> 00:46:30.320
<v Speaker 1>be functioning as reinforcement, What was the outcome that was

947
00:46:30.519 --> 00:46:33.079
<v Speaker 1>likely the reason for those type of behaviors, Like what

948
00:46:33.199 --> 00:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is that individual trying to get out of those situations? Now,

949
00:46:36.000 --> 00:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in the study, each of these conditions is presented and

950
00:46:39.960 --> 00:46:44.880
<v Speaker 1>represented again and again in a randomized order until the

951
00:46:44.920 --> 00:46:49.599
<v Speaker 1>individual had experienced each condition multiple times and either what

952
00:46:49.760 --> 00:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>happened was data demonstrated a systematic pattern, meaning that it

953
00:46:53.480 --> 00:46:58.320
<v Speaker 1>was differentially observed only in certain conditions, or else they

954
00:46:58.360 --> 00:47:01.840
<v Speaker 1>completed twelve days of sets, so that was essentially the

955
00:47:01.960 --> 00:47:04.360
<v Speaker 1>arrangement is they're like, it wasn't thating. You do it once,

956
00:47:04.440 --> 00:47:07.119
<v Speaker 1>you don't do like one time, you do that attention condition,

957
00:47:07.239 --> 00:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>one time you do the demand condition. You do them repeatedly,

958
00:47:10.719 --> 00:47:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but you rotate through them. So you would do that

959
00:47:13.360 --> 00:47:15.639
<v Speaker 1>toy play condition, then you go do it that a

960
00:47:15.760 --> 00:47:19.320
<v Speaker 1>social disapproval attention condition. Then you might do the alone condition.

961
00:47:19.719 --> 00:47:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Then you'll do that demand condition, Then you do the

962
00:47:22.199 --> 00:47:25.599
<v Speaker 1>attention condition again, then you do that alone condition again,

963
00:47:25.960 --> 00:47:28.280
<v Speaker 1>then you do that social attention condition again, then a

964
00:47:28.320 --> 00:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>demand condition, then maybe another demand condition. Anyway, you're just

965
00:47:32.079 --> 00:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>cycling through these until you either see that one condition

966
00:47:35.440 --> 00:47:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is clearly showing a pattern where there's elevated rates of

967
00:47:39.840 --> 00:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that challenging behavior in that condition, which would tell you

968
00:47:42.480 --> 00:47:44.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the time that the behavior like, that's why that

969
00:47:44.719 --> 00:47:49.239
<v Speaker 1>behavior occurs is because that situation provokes it and rewards it.

970
00:47:49.960 --> 00:47:52.679
<v Speaker 1>And if not, then you would keep going until you

971
00:47:52.719 --> 00:47:55.280
<v Speaker 1>either saw that or you had done twelve days and

972
00:47:55.320 --> 00:47:59.480
<v Speaker 1>probably what you saw is a wide distribution across all

973
00:47:59.480 --> 00:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>conditions or at least three of the four conditions.

974
00:48:02.480 --> 00:48:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one hundred percent. Now they successfully demonstrated systematic allocations

975
00:48:06.840 --> 00:48:09.960
<v Speaker 2>of self harm behaviors across specific situations for most of

976
00:48:09.960 --> 00:48:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the subjects in the study, indicating that they now felt

977
00:48:12.360 --> 00:48:15.840
<v Speaker 2>confident in understanding why the behaviors occurred in the first place. Furthermore,

978
00:48:16.079 --> 00:48:18.239
<v Speaker 2>in combination with the technology developed by car and Ran

979
00:48:18.280 --> 00:48:21.320
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen eighty five, behaviorists could now identify what an

980
00:48:21.320 --> 00:48:24.559
<v Speaker 2>individual needed when they engage in challenging behavior and teach

981
00:48:24.599 --> 00:48:28.119
<v Speaker 2>them to communicate their needs rather than to engage in

982
00:48:28.119 --> 00:48:29.760
<v Speaker 2>those harmful, dangerous behaviors.

983
00:48:29.920 --> 00:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>I will get a little bit more into that as

984
00:48:32.760 --> 00:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>we get through this, Because they become inherently linked it's

985
00:48:35.719 --> 00:48:37.639
<v Speaker 1>not just like, well, now we know what's happening and

986
00:48:37.880 --> 00:48:42.679
<v Speaker 1>done by it's like, now, what do we proceed from

987
00:48:43.079 --> 00:48:46.599
<v Speaker 1>this analysis, this assessment? What do we do with that information?

988
00:48:47.400 --> 00:48:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And so we get We'll talk more about that in

989
00:48:49.639 --> 00:48:52.360
<v Speaker 1>subsequent parts of this discussion. So that was the study

990
00:48:52.400 --> 00:48:55.519
<v Speaker 1>that we just described in relatively elaborate detail, how the

991
00:48:55.519 --> 00:48:58.199
<v Speaker 1>study was set up and what they found. And this

992
00:48:58.559 --> 00:49:02.039
<v Speaker 1>was a very import and study. Now, at first, this

993
00:49:02.519 --> 00:49:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I think kind of flew under the radar. It was

994
00:49:06.360 --> 00:49:11.320
<v Speaker 1>not quite as widely recognized, but it did become recognized

995
00:49:11.440 --> 00:49:15.760
<v Speaker 1>fairly soon afterward. What this was contributing to how people

996
00:49:15.800 --> 00:49:20.239
<v Speaker 1>were approaching trying to understand when behaviors like self harm

997
00:49:20.599 --> 00:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>occurred and people who they lacked sufficient language to communicate

998
00:49:25.880 --> 00:49:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what it was that they needed in those moments. Okay,

999
00:49:28.480 --> 00:49:31.519
<v Speaker 1>And so this was later republished in the Journal of

1000
00:49:31.559 --> 00:49:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Applied Behavior Analysis in nineteen ninety four. That's one of

1001
00:49:34.199 --> 00:49:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the most common dates you'll see associated with this now,

1002
00:49:36.760 --> 00:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and it became one of, if not the most cited

1003
00:49:40.039 --> 00:49:43.440
<v Speaker 1>study in all of behavior analysis history and launched a

1004
00:49:43.559 --> 00:49:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally different approach to addressing these types of challenging potentially

1005
00:49:49.599 --> 00:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, problematic behaviors that in the past no one

1006
00:49:53.519 --> 00:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>had any idea what to do about those. Now there

1007
00:49:57.079 --> 00:50:01.039
<v Speaker 1>was a very clear direction that was guiding how people

1008
00:50:01.119 --> 00:50:04.519
<v Speaker 1>would start thinking about and attempting to provide some kind

1009
00:50:04.559 --> 00:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of support for moving forward.

1010
00:50:07.039 --> 00:50:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, I mean this is a groundbreaking study for sure.

1011
00:50:11.119 --> 00:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>It was, and yeah, widely study, widely utilized. We're going

1012
00:50:15.039 --> 00:50:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to go ahead and pause here for this part of

1013
00:50:17.119 --> 00:50:20.119
<v Speaker 1>the discussion because and the next part we're going to

1014
00:50:20.239 --> 00:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>get into. After this happened, there was a massive interest

1015
00:50:26.320 --> 00:50:30.599
<v Speaker 1>in how to further refine, develop and evolve these procedures

1016
00:50:30.599 --> 00:50:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to be as effective and as efficient as possible and

1017
00:50:33.400 --> 00:50:35.920
<v Speaker 1>test their limits when doesn't it work, What can we

1018
00:50:35.920 --> 00:50:38.800
<v Speaker 1>do instead? What are the other problems that might have

1019
00:50:38.880 --> 00:50:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't necessarily think about when we were first

1020
00:50:40.880 --> 00:50:43.599
<v Speaker 1>putting these together. There's a lot that happened, and so

1021
00:50:43.679 --> 00:50:45.559
<v Speaker 1>that'll be the next discussion that we'll come back to,

1022
00:50:45.719 --> 00:50:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is getting into that second part where we really dig

1023
00:50:48.400 --> 00:50:52.079
<v Speaker 1>into the evolution of this technology and where it sort

1024
00:50:52.079 --> 00:50:55.119
<v Speaker 1>of went. But let's go ahead and pause there. We'll

1025
00:50:55.119 --> 00:50:57.159
<v Speaker 1>wrap up this discussion, and at the end of our

1026
00:50:57.159 --> 00:50:59.800
<v Speaker 1>full length discussions, even when we break them into multiple

1027
00:50:59.800 --> 00:51:02.320
<v Speaker 1>par art. We're going to recommend some things because it's

1028
00:51:02.360 --> 00:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>fun and we do it every single time. So if

1029
00:51:03.719 --> 00:51:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you're joining us for the first time, surprise. That's the

1030
00:51:05.920 --> 00:51:07.559
<v Speaker 1>thing that we do at the end is we recommend

1031
00:51:07.559 --> 00:51:10.320
<v Speaker 1>some things, and I recommend sticking around for those recommendations

1032
00:51:10.320 --> 00:51:13.159
<v Speaker 1>because they're fun, agreed, and you're here for the fun,

1033
00:51:13.480 --> 00:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So do that thing. Before we get into that though,

1034
00:51:16.280 --> 00:51:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll get through some credits and all of that and

1035
00:51:18.920 --> 00:51:20.719
<v Speaker 1>let you know what you can do to support us,

1036
00:51:20.719 --> 00:51:23.119
<v Speaker 1>which is that, as I mentioned to the top, you

1037
00:51:23.119 --> 00:51:25.920
<v Speaker 1>can leave us a rating and a review wherever you

1038
00:51:25.960 --> 00:51:27.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to is just give us a maximum number of stars,

1039
00:51:27.800 --> 00:51:29.679
<v Speaker 1>say something nice about us if you got the time

1040
00:51:30.400 --> 00:51:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and the gusto to do so, and that really helps

1041
00:51:34.199 --> 00:51:36.039
<v Speaker 1>us out. We do appreciate it. And if you would

1042
00:51:36.079 --> 00:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>like to take the leap a little bit further, you

1043
00:51:37.519 --> 00:51:39.239
<v Speaker 1>can also go tell a friend, maybe take their phone

1044
00:51:39.280 --> 00:51:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and subscribe for them, maybe rate us five stars for

1045
00:51:41.719 --> 00:51:43.519
<v Speaker 1>them as well. Whatever you know, just do the thing.

1046
00:51:43.840 --> 00:51:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But really to take the leap, you can go over

1047
00:51:46.400 --> 00:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and join us on Patreon. This is a financial commitment

1048
00:51:48.519 --> 00:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that can be a little one. You can dedicate however

1049
00:51:50.119 --> 00:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>much you feel comfortable with. But if you do that,

1050
00:51:52.360 --> 00:51:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll be eternally grateful and we will will shout you

1051
00:51:54.920 --> 00:51:57.400
<v Speaker 1>out at the end of our discussions for helping to

1052
00:51:57.679 --> 00:51:59.800
<v Speaker 1>keep us a podcast. And I don't really mention this often,

1053
00:51:59.840 --> 00:52:02.559
<v Speaker 1>but we have really fun names for the various tiers

1054
00:52:02.559 --> 00:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at which you can sign up. You can be an

1055
00:52:04.119 --> 00:52:07.440
<v Speaker 1>armchair psychologist. You can be a pop psychologist. You can

1056
00:52:07.480 --> 00:52:11.559
<v Speaker 1>be an undergraduate research participant. Uh huh, it's a good one.

1057
00:52:11.679 --> 00:52:13.800
<v Speaker 1>You can be a budding behaviorist. There's all kinds of

1058
00:52:13.800 --> 00:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>things that you can be at the various tiers at

1059
00:52:15.880 --> 00:52:17.440
<v Speaker 1>which you sign up. You get to sign up for

1060
00:52:17.440 --> 00:52:20.159
<v Speaker 1>the label that you'd like to have, and that's just fun.

1061
00:52:20.199 --> 00:52:22.519
<v Speaker 1>But more importantly and why most people are here when

1062
00:52:22.519 --> 00:52:24.519
<v Speaker 1>they sign up, is that they get some bonus content

1063
00:52:24.559 --> 00:52:26.800
<v Speaker 1>add free episodes, early episodes, and at the end of

1064
00:52:26.840 --> 00:52:29.599
<v Speaker 1>our discussions, I'll read the names of all the people

1065
00:52:30.039 --> 00:52:32.119
<v Speaker 1>as a shout out for them being so generous and

1066
00:52:32.159 --> 00:52:34.800
<v Speaker 1>their support. So thank you and shout out to Mike

1067
00:52:35.000 --> 00:52:39.400
<v Speaker 1>m Megan, Mike t, Justin, Kim Brad, Stephanie, Brian, Ashley

1068
00:52:39.480 --> 00:52:42.599
<v Speaker 1>Kerr and Charlie. Appreciate you all so much for everything

1069
00:52:42.599 --> 00:52:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you've done. To help us be a podcast.

1070
00:52:44.480 --> 00:52:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're the best, truly absolutely.

1071
00:52:47.480 --> 00:52:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Also, thank you so much to my team of people

1072
00:52:49.159 --> 00:52:51.679
<v Speaker 1>without whom I could not make podcasts. Takes a lot

1073
00:52:51.679 --> 00:52:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of work, takes a village, and I need them so

1074
00:52:54.000 --> 00:52:56.559
<v Speaker 1>writing and fact checking from Shane and myself. Thank you

1075
00:52:56.599 --> 00:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for recording with me today, Shane anytime. Our social media

1076
00:52:59.519 --> 00:53:02.320
<v Speaker 1>coordinator is Alma Wilson. And the person who makes the

1077
00:53:02.360 --> 00:53:04.960
<v Speaker 1>words that spew out of our mouths turn into a

1078
00:53:05.000 --> 00:53:09.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast as Justin God Emperor, producer extraordinaire of wonderful Greatness

1079
00:53:09.480 --> 00:53:11.199
<v Speaker 1>from Planet Awesome, and he's so good at what he

1080
00:53:11.239 --> 00:53:13.159
<v Speaker 1>does and we appreciate him so much.

1081
00:53:13.599 --> 00:53:17.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, otherwise you hear us just say about the whole time.

1082
00:53:17.119 --> 00:53:19.000
<v Speaker 1>That is that is exactly what it sounds like. These

1083
00:53:19.000 --> 00:53:22.840
<v Speaker 1>are facts. So thank Justin for making this podcast sound

1084
00:53:22.920 --> 00:53:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so good and creamy and buttery in your ears. Mm hmm,

1085
00:53:27.079 --> 00:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>all right, I think this we have to say, so

1086
00:53:28.440 --> 00:53:30.199
<v Speaker 1>come back for part two. We're going to be continuing

1087
00:53:30.199 --> 00:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to elaborate on the important aspects of the functional analysis.

1088
00:53:33.000 --> 00:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We really just barely got to dig into the surface

1089
00:53:34.960 --> 00:53:38.119
<v Speaker 1>here and we got through the core foundational study and

1090
00:53:38.119 --> 00:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>which was important, but like there's so much that happened

1091
00:53:41.480 --> 00:53:44.159
<v Speaker 1>after this, there's a lot to impact. So is there

1092
00:53:44.239 --> 00:53:46.039
<v Speaker 1>anything that I forgot or you like to add before

1093
00:53:46.079 --> 00:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we transition to our recommendations.

1094
00:53:47.760 --> 00:53:48.480
<v Speaker 2>No, not today.

1095
00:53:48.679 --> 00:53:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I did forget to say that. If you'd like

1096
00:53:50.480 --> 00:53:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to tell us your thoughts on anything we've discussed so

1097
00:53:53.079 --> 00:53:55.079
<v Speaker 1>far on FAS, or you like to throw your hat

1098
00:53:55.079 --> 00:53:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the ring in terms of some other things we

1099
00:53:56.480 --> 00:53:59.400
<v Speaker 1>might add in the future parts of this discussion, good luck,

1100
00:53:59.400 --> 00:54:01.039
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of the we're recording ahead of time,

1101
00:54:01.119 --> 00:54:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but we might get to some of it. So you

1102
00:54:02.519 --> 00:54:04.880
<v Speaker 1>can read us directly by emailing us at info at

1103
00:54:04.960 --> 00:54:08.800
<v Speaker 1>wwdwwdpodcast dot com, or you can reach us on the

1104
00:54:08.840 --> 00:54:10.639
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms, and we do look forward to hearing

1105
00:54:10.639 --> 00:54:13.239
<v Speaker 1>from you. So do that thing, please do by Okay,

1106
00:54:13.840 --> 00:54:15.519
<v Speaker 1>let's recommend some things.

1107
00:54:15.920 --> 00:54:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm in recommendations.

1108
00:54:25.400 --> 00:54:29.280
<v Speaker 1>A couple episodes ago, at some point, Shane recommended the

1109
00:54:29.440 --> 00:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>TV show, specifically the episode Gary for a TV show

1110
00:54:33.920 --> 00:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>called The Bear. This is their final season. Season five

1111
00:54:37.360 --> 00:54:40.360
<v Speaker 1>wraps up this entire TV show. It was recently released

1112
00:54:40.719 --> 00:54:43.039
<v Speaker 1>as available on Disney Plus and Hulu. If you have

1113
00:54:43.119 --> 00:54:46.599
<v Speaker 1>never heard of this, this is essentially about a restaurant,

1114
00:54:47.320 --> 00:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is a lot of gorgeous close ups of

1115
00:54:51.000 --> 00:54:56.280
<v Speaker 1>people performing very competent tasks preparing food, and it evolves

1116
00:54:56.400 --> 00:55:00.079
<v Speaker 1>from kind of like a rundown sandwich shop into so

1117
00:55:00.239 --> 00:55:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a super high class highly rated critic Rave reviewed restaurant

1118
00:55:05.400 --> 00:55:08.599
<v Speaker 1>over the course of several seasons. It is like anxiety

1119
00:55:08.639 --> 00:55:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and TV show form, but also like there's a lot

1120
00:55:11.159 --> 00:55:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of heart, there's a lot of depth, there's a lot

1121
00:55:13.400 --> 00:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of story, there's a lot of character, and some really

1122
00:55:16.519 --> 00:55:19.360
<v Speaker 1>great people who are on the show. In the season five,

1123
00:55:19.480 --> 00:55:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I felt like ended just masterfully. It felt really satisfying,

1124
00:55:23.800 --> 00:55:26.320
<v Speaker 1>It felt pretty complete. I feel like it's hard for

1125
00:55:26.360 --> 00:55:29.239
<v Speaker 1>shows to end well, and they stuck the landing pretty well.

1126
00:55:29.320 --> 00:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>So season five of The Bear is available now go

1127
00:55:32.519 --> 00:55:34.400
<v Speaker 1>check it out if you haven't already. It's a good

1128
00:55:34.440 --> 00:55:36.519
<v Speaker 1>time and I think people who have already liked the

1129
00:55:36.559 --> 00:55:38.400
<v Speaker 1>show will like it. People who are new to the show,

1130
00:55:38.679 --> 00:55:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll find it a nice satisfying conclusion to

1131
00:55:41.000 --> 00:55:44.119
<v Speaker 1>what was a very chaotic start in the first season.

1132
00:55:44.239 --> 00:55:47.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes yes. I agree. Huge recommend

1133
00:55:47.760 --> 00:55:50.400
<v Speaker 2>bonus recommend on that too, because I fully support that.

1134
00:55:50.440 --> 00:55:51.599
<v Speaker 2>It's just lovely.

1135
00:55:51.679 --> 00:55:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Awesome, that's That's what I would recommend is the TV

1136
00:55:54.480 --> 00:55:56.679
<v Speaker 1>show The Bear season five beautiful.

1137
00:55:56.719 --> 00:55:59.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna recommend a little piece of music. It is

1138
00:55:59.480 --> 00:56:02.679
<v Speaker 2>a band out of Boston called Fiddlehead. They are this

1139
00:56:02.840 --> 00:56:05.519
<v Speaker 2>is the singer of a hardcore band called Have Heart,

1140
00:56:05.920 --> 00:56:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and he's been doing this for a long time. Fiddle

1141
00:56:07.800 --> 00:56:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Heads actually put out more records than Have Heart ever did.

1142
00:56:10.079 --> 00:56:12.400
<v Speaker 2>But have Heart was super influential and like current hardcore,

1143
00:56:12.599 --> 00:56:14.719
<v Speaker 2>but Fiddlehead is a little bit different, and so they

1144
00:56:14.719 --> 00:56:16.599
<v Speaker 2>put out a new EP called Baby I'll Change. And

1145
00:56:16.679 --> 00:56:20.000
<v Speaker 2>if you are interested in something that's got like a

1146
00:56:20.239 --> 00:56:24.360
<v Speaker 2>nice melodic kind of like nineties alt feel, it's got

1147
00:56:24.400 --> 00:56:28.760
<v Speaker 2>that vibe for sure, you know, very introspective lyrics, catchy hooks,

1148
00:56:28.880 --> 00:56:32.000
<v Speaker 2>really great guitar work, their drum, their rhythm section is incredible,

1149
00:56:32.400 --> 00:56:35.559
<v Speaker 2>just like really technically proficient, and they're not doing anything

1150
00:56:35.599 --> 00:56:37.920
<v Speaker 2>like mind blowing. It's like going to go like, oh

1151
00:56:37.920 --> 00:56:39.679
<v Speaker 2>my gosh, like these are you know, like it's not

1152
00:56:39.719 --> 00:56:42.599
<v Speaker 2>an Ingva Momstein type of situation, but like for if

1153
00:56:42.599 --> 00:56:44.599
<v Speaker 2>you're a musician and you listen to it, you go, oh, like,

1154
00:56:44.679 --> 00:56:46.599
<v Speaker 2>these guys really know what they're doing and they do

1155
00:56:46.679 --> 00:56:48.760
<v Speaker 2>it well, and it's like they're just they have it

1156
00:56:48.960 --> 00:56:51.880
<v Speaker 2>locked in so fun. It's only three songs this EP

1157
00:56:52.039 --> 00:56:54.760
<v Speaker 2>called Baby I'll Change, and every song on it's great,

1158
00:56:54.800 --> 00:56:57.440
<v Speaker 2>every it's perfect. It's a perfect release, so I strongly

1159
00:56:57.480 --> 00:56:58.480
<v Speaker 2>recommend it. Cool.

1160
00:56:58.800 --> 00:57:01.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, So it's the Bear season five and the

1161
00:57:02.199 --> 00:57:05.360
<v Speaker 1>group Fiddlehead with the EP Baby al Change. If you

1162
00:57:05.400 --> 00:57:08.119
<v Speaker 1>want to go check those things out. Awesome, Well, I

1163
00:57:08.119 --> 00:57:09.519
<v Speaker 1>think this way I have to say about this for now.

1164
00:57:09.559 --> 00:57:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Come back for Part two and then probably a part three.

1165
00:57:11.840 --> 00:57:14.599
<v Speaker 1>We're going to continue to discuss and explore these functional

1166
00:57:14.639 --> 00:57:16.880
<v Speaker 1>analysis things that make up a huge chunk of what

1167
00:57:17.000 --> 00:57:19.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of behavior analysts are kind of doing out

1168
00:57:19.199 --> 00:57:21.599
<v Speaker 1>in the world. I think that's where we wrap this

1169
00:57:21.679 --> 00:57:23.199
<v Speaker 1>up now. Anything that you'd like to add or that

1170
00:57:23.239 --> 00:57:24.519
<v Speaker 1>I forgot before we say goodbyes?

1171
00:57:24.719 --> 00:57:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Nope, not today.

1172
00:57:25.400 --> 00:57:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you all for listening. I'll see you next time.

1173
00:57:27.000 --> 00:57:29.559
<v Speaker 1>This is Abraham When's Machine. We're out.

1174
00:57:30.159 --> 00:57:30.559
<v Speaker 2>See ya.

1175
00:57:31.440 --> 00:57:33.599
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Why we Do what We Do.

1176
00:57:34.119 --> 00:57:36.719
<v Speaker 2>You can learn more about this and other episodes by

1177
00:57:36.840 --> 00:57:42.119
<v Speaker 2>going to WWDWWD podcast dot com. Thanks for listening, and

1178
00:57:42.159 --> 00:57:59.159
<v Speaker 2>we hope you have an awesome day.
