Speaker 1: It was loading. All right, welcome to sixty agenda. We
are live a little bit early today.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna let everybody kind of creep on in. I
got my man Ben from End of the World News back.
We're gonna be talking about the Second Crusade today. I'm
seeing a lot of rhetoric around Crusade two point zero
coming up from Alex Jones. He did a crazy interview
with Snico a week or so ago and I was like, dude,
we should talk about this because it's just hilarious. Back
I think the next day he did one with Fuintes
and he started calling for crusade and it is the
most animated interview. And then he also goes into this
weird Holy War Crusade thing. We've talked about the Holy
word t shirts all the way back like a year ago,
so this is a long time coming. This is something
we've talked about many times. So yeah, welcome on, Ben.
I'm excited to talk.
Speaker 1: About this with you. How you doing today, Hey, thank
you for having me on.
Speaker 3: It's always a pleasure to come on and talk about
these crazy things with you.
Speaker 1: And I'm with you.
Speaker 3: When I was watching this stuff and watching him call
for a crusade, and of course Sneako was playing the
villain or the heel in this fight that was going
on in the public domain. And the only thing I
thought about, and I was reading the comments, and you know,
there was the Muslims that were sticking up for Sneako,
there were the Christians that were calling for a crusade
like Alex Johan was in the comments, and the entire
time I was thinking, behind every revolution, there is always
a hidden hand. Go back to the French rap and
all these people are getting played.
Speaker 1: It's a trap.
Speaker 3: So yeah, it's wild to watch when you see the
world through this lens or this view.
Speaker 1: Yeah, every one of them are.
Speaker 2: And that's interesting you just brought that up, you know,
because I think about the Albert Pike letter when I
think about what's going on right now, and I think
it's ironic that somebody like Alex Jones could be talking
about things like this and not realize the irony of
what he's saying, because he is feeding right into a
large conspiracy that he has to know about. And that's
Albert Pike's letter about the three World Wars, and so
I see it kind of unfolding this third aspect of
the Third World War, forgery or not, it seems to
always end up being legitimate whenever history plays out right.
Speaker 3: Well, that begs the question Alex Jones should know this?
So is he an idiot or does he have an agenda?
And I would say we'd have to look at his
total body of work to see what he's actually done,
to see his intentions. And here was a man who
was the gold standard in conspiracy, right, and we know
how controlled ops works, but there's a certain number of
people that will see through the mainstream of the mainstream narrative,
if you will, and then they put in their controlled opposition.
So he was speaking truth. And now there were some
questions about his Zionist loyalties and stuff like that, is
he Bill Hicks? But he was still considered the gold
standard of truth. And then in twenty twenty three he
posts this video that's actually questioning if Trump is going
to be the Antichrist or if Elon Musk is building
out the antichrist system. And then fast forward a year
he becomes a complete shill or what I would say,
to the point, he's a propagandist for the Trump administration,
pushing Elon Musk, So you got to ask yourself, you know,
what are his true intentions? And I think the guy's
clearly an opt and he's pushing this one right here.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a weird move to be like, look, I'm
not with Israel, I'm not for what Israel doing it
at the same time, we need a crusade which is like, look,
I get it, I know what he's saying, but how
can you not also be like, look, the globalists are
pushing these people here and not pointing out as like
it's Islam.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 2: It's a weird thing to do with that, you know,
because you are playing on the Christians, is what he's doing.
And he's got a large Christian base, you know, and
clearly that's kind of what he's playing to, and he
understands he could probably galvanize them behind the movement like
this while also play cating to the anti Israel camp
that does watch him still, But he's doing that in
a haphazard way because his true intentions really lie within
this galvanizing the Christian base behind this Holy War which
usher's in this Third World War, which is what was
laid out by Albert Pike of Freemason a long time ago.
Speaker 1: Who is involved. It's easy to find.
Speaker 4: Let me go.
Speaker 2: Let me go find that, actually, because it's a laundry
list of families that he's actually connected to whenever you
go look.
Speaker 1: I wasn't even aware of this.
Speaker 2: So the Pikes by blood and marriage, connect to the Kingsbury's,
the Coffins, the Littles, the Moodies, the Cuttings, the Noises,
the Weber's, the Chapmans, the Harrises, the Pulsifier, Pulsifers, Andrews's, Burnham's, Wheelers, Brown's,
knights Dale.
Speaker 1: So clearly a lot of old.
Speaker 2: Families, as it says here and so, and this is
from a historian, George Adam, who gave a history of
this guy who was the master Mason in the Scottish
Right Freemasonry. So well, we're talking about the hidden hand,
as you mentioned, that's what I think.
Speaker 3: About, right, Oh, absolutely, And you know, if you study history,
I don't know if I believe anything. I wonder if
everything at some point was some type of false flag
or a hidden hand behind a movement. And we just
think that it's natural.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 3: We're also you know, ragging on Alex Jones, as we should,
because you know what he's pushing to the public.
Speaker 1: I don't think is a good thing.
Speaker 3: But on the other side, you had sneak O, which
we talked about earlier, playing the heel. I mean, he
is going out in the middle of the street during
the World Cup. He is rooting publicly all over the
internet twenty four hours a day with all Muslim countries
Noma la everybody will pray, you know, for three hours
a day or whatever the fuck it is that they do.
Right Andy saying this online, clearly promoting this he it's
the false dialectic that we're pointing out.
Speaker 1: It's not really about Alex Jones.
Speaker 2: It's not about Sneako, it's not about any of these
people in particular. It's about the overall general movement that
they're a part of that whether they know it or not,
they're feeding it in their galvanizing people behind something that
has been written a long time ago. And so I
can't see this as like coincidence. Sorry, you know what
I mean. And that's kind of how I view it.
Speaker 3: Oh, it's very performative, right, Like he's not in the mosque,
you know, praying living rights life.
Speaker 1: He's all over the streets.
Speaker 3: He's dressing up like he's in the Middle East, and
no other Muslims have been Muslims whole life. For wearing
that headscarf around their head and screaming into the camera
whatever praise be to Allah.
Speaker 1: You know, welcome to New York, New York.
Speaker 3: Atstan Madonni's New York, the whole world will become Muslim.
And I got to think that Muslims in America are
sitting there and just kind of cringing because they clearly
don't do this stuff. And one more thing, I think
this is interesting, and we kind of talked about it
before the podcast actually started and shout out Stephen from
Biblical Hitman. You know, the reason he converted to being
a Muslim because he was raised Catholic, He's Filipino and
I think white. He's not even from the Middle East.
Not that you have to be from the Middle East
to be a Muslim, but and this coming from his
own mouth, he converted to being a Muslim because of
Andrew Tate. So let's not forget that he was brought
into this entire Red Pill movement, which I think we
could both agree it's some type of intelligence operation that's
going on. It's like the counter to fourth wave feminism
and especially what's going on the news with Tate. He's
really being used as an instrument of change by the system.
And then when you kind of look into the videos
came out where his foot was missing and all these
other AI videos, You're like, you know, I guess what
I'm trying to say, is his conversion to Muslim being
a Muslim? It was very suspect who he was associated with.
And then when he starts to make it so performative
in the public and we don't see regular Muslims doing this,
why is he doing that?
Speaker 1: Right? So he's clearly getting paid by somebody to do this. Well,
that's right.
Speaker 2: And you know, I try to look at this from
like a big from like other people's eyes, you know
what I mean. I'm not I'm a certain age, I'm
a certain demographic, So I try not to be that.
Speaker 1: Does that make sense?
Speaker 2: So I try to like listen to things people are
listening to, or try to look at it like who's
seeing this, right, Like what age group is seeing this?
And what is this actually doing for that movement?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 2: And so when you see somebody like for instance, Jack
Neil repost a interview he did in July with Andrew
Tate that describes in details all the events that led
into the current situation he's in now where he gets arrested, right,
And he's pretty much posing himself as a savior for
young men, posing himself as this person who's saying young
men are enough and they deserve to be you know whatever. Right,
So it sounds good and everything he says. He puts
himself as a hero. And so now when you talk
about this video and it not being like legitimately real,
I think, Okay, So he's posing as like this, like, yeah,
he's like this hero that's being slain by the system
and we got to you know. So it adds to
the galvination behind this color movement that we've talked about
many times on the show.
Speaker 1: From different aspects.
Speaker 2: It's not just one thing, right, You've got the anti Zionist,
You've got this aspect, which it all kind of correlates
together in this kind of conversation today. Now, Jack Neil's
interesting one too. We're gonna be all over the place
with people he went to the University of Austin hold
on what's the one connected to Pound Tier.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Joe Lonsdale and you can't trust him.
Speaker 2: Come on, Joe Lonsdale and Barry Weiss started a college
called the University of Austin. And this Joe Lonsdale is
a co founder of Palentier. Okay, Barry Wise was appointed
to be the like CBS lady or whatever as.
Speaker 1: Soon as who bought it. Uh, what's his name? Ellison?
Speaker 2: Ellison, Larry Ellison, the guy who owns Oracle that's connected
with Palentiner. So yes, when we're talking about this Zionist
technocratic system, it's one thing, and it's moving like a
spider web in different ways, towards the galvination of the young, uh,
right wing and left wing groups.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, I thought they were going to try
to bring the left and the right together and opposition
of Israel, and I still think they're doing that. But
there's definitely this crusade that Alex Jones is talking about.
It definitely throws a monkey wrench into that because there's
gonna be some if they follow through this, which I
think they want to. And it's not just Alex Jones,
it's people that work for Alex Jones. Who's that one
guy with the glasses. I'm blanking on his name, Harrison Smith.
You know he's super racial. Anytime you're pushing this racial politics,
identity and all that type of stuff, you know, I
just don't agree with this.
Speaker 1: I got to wonder, how is this going to play out?
Speaker 3: Is there going to be some type of civil war
going on in America first before it goes to the least.
Speaker 1: I don't know. We'll see where it is.
Speaker 3: Or maybe this is just more divide and conquer until
the time is right, right, until it's time to pull
the string on whatever they're trying to do.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree.
Speaker 2: And well, whenever you look at Alex Jones in the
school he went to, he went to a liberal arts
school in Austin that was being funded by IBM Bill
Gates mom, and then guess who kept funding and it
is a liberal arts school that they were actually trying
to institute like some technological whatever into I look at
this as what we see today the influencer world, the
technocratic world, like liberal arts school mixed with technology. Hmm, right,
Silicon Valley coming and infiltrating a liberal arts school in Austin,
and then now we have all these influencers everywhere. And
then they made their own school, Austin University, that's completely separate.
So when you start to look at this, you're like, oh, man,
Bill and Melinda Gates fund that school, continuing, continuing the.
Speaker 1: Legacy of IBM and his mother.
Speaker 3: Right, yeah, that's wild what you said about Jack McNeil,
because I saw him, right, I didn't really know who
he was, but I saw a couple of big people
on his podcasts from like you had Tucker Carlson on there,
you had Andrew Tay, you had Owen Wilson. I'm like,
this is this guy, Professor Yang. And then when you
find out that he went to the Austin College, which
is funded by Palenteer, you're like, this.
Speaker 2: Guy's founded by Palenteer pretty much as a puppet.
Speaker 1: This guy is a puppet.
Speaker 2: The two most Zionist palate Well, I'm sorry, I should
say the most Zionist Palateer guy was Joela Is is
Joe Lonsdale.
Speaker 1: You know when he talks.
Speaker 2: About Iran on Sean Ryan, he talks about Iran and
we need to get in there and take it like
they're an enemy. You know, somebody that he keeps like
talking about. And this is the guy who who runs
the drone systems and everything for Palenteer along with Alex Krp.
So it's like, dude, these guys, broy, why is it
today all these people who happened to be talking about
these things, telling us truth and helping, you know, helping us,
happen to also be connected to all the people that
are like bringing it in.
Speaker 3: Yeah see, oh yeah, well they're trying to expose themselves,
but they're going to guide the truth in a certain direction,
so it ends in the outcome they want. It's kind
of like a limited hangout, right, yes, in a little
different way. But yeah, if you're connected to pollnteering, you're
propped up. Who's that one guy? I think his name
is Jesse Michaels or something like that. Jesse Mitchell's yeah Mitchell.
Speaker 1: He works for Peter Thiel. Right, he admits it. Anybody
who listens to him goes, well, he admits it. So
it's not a big deal and this and that. It's like,
but but have you looked at who Peter Teal is.
Speaker 2: He says that democracy and freedom are not co like
cod like you can't coincide, and saying pretty much that
we need to get rid of like western Voute like
get rid of everything.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I worry about that.
Speaker 2: And then when you look at the fact he likes
Curtis Jarvin, right, who talks about virtualizing people, and then
he has a company with Brian Johnson who's cloning himself,
and like, you know, and he's and he's connected to
other people who are keeping their like Sam Altman, who
want to keep his brain in a jar so he
can put it inside of a clone later.
Speaker 1: Like these people are crazy, bro.
Speaker 2: You know, Peter Thiel is known for injecting young people's
blood in his body to live longer. So these are
the people, Like, how are you going to act like him?
Working with Peter Teel isn't that big of a deal.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's a huge deal.
Speaker 3: And somebody in the chat, I think at el Quem
said here, so one guy says, I don't think we're
c to war a civil war in the US for
too comfy. Possibly I'm not dying on the hill. But
some guy says here in Europe it's near World War three,
And I actually agree with that because with this huge
immigration migration all throughout the world. The majority of our
immigrants in the United States come from South America and
they culturally align more with American values. I guess you
could white American values if you will. I don't view
it that way, but that's how a lot of people
view it. I think that's a more cohesive match. But
when you think about Europe, the majority of their immigration
comes from the Middle East. And I'm not, you know,
anti this or anti that, but I would be lying
if you say to say that these two merging of
cultures are going to immerge smoothly.
Speaker 1: They're not. They're you know, completely the opposite.
Speaker 3: So I could definitely see a crusade thing type happening
in you know, throughout Europe, and I think we already
seeing that happen. I mean, you have those videos I
think from Ireland and stuff about the integration. You have
all the laws that favored the Muslim immigrants that come
in versus the people who live there, and people in
Europe are really starting to get ticked off. And that's
why you have guys like Tommy Robinson.
Speaker 2: I'm not necessarily like, I don't I'm not like hanging
my hat on like, oh, the crusade aspect.
Speaker 1: I'm more hanging my head.
Speaker 2: On the galvanization of people towards a certain ideology because
the dosing, I believe, is really what matters. The data
collecting of who believes what, who thinks what, That's really
all that matters here. So right now I think that
that's what matters. So who's listening to Alex Jones, who's
listening to Nico? Who believes this? Who believes that? You know,
That's what they care about more than anything. And that's
why I think you see so many different things going
on at once, because when I think of this whole thing,
I think about the the Bolshevik Revolution, and I think
about the fact that they would galvanize people behind a
movement that they you know, that the people said that
they were for, but then when they took power, where
they turn around and kill everybody.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: And then you look at the hundred Flowers campaign with
you know, China, same thing, they take power, but they
did it a little different. They go tell us the
problems you have, right, and people start saying this, that
and the third and he goes, well, this turned into
a whole crui state against me and he killed one
hundred million people.
Speaker 1: Right. So, like my point is, they want to know.
Speaker 2: They want you to dox yourself and right, now the
technology is at a point where with the data collection,
they know what you're thinking, they know how you feel.
They didn't want to see how they could push you
a certain way, so they could see if they could
get you to, you know, coincide with the way they
want you to be right. And so that's kind of
the way I look at this. It's more about pushing
people than it is about you know, war, you know
what I mean.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I agree with you. It's all about data collection.
Speaker 3: They're building out, you know, what I would call the
b system or the surveillance state or the digital third
Temple where they want to know everything about us.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And a lot of this conversation is happening on X.
And I didn't drink the kool aid when Elon Musk
bought X, I was like, wait a minute, this guy's
part of the agenda. And now who's buying this app
and promoting free speech? Although within a week of it
with their new CEO, Linda Yakarino whatever his name was, it's,
you know, freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.
But when you look at who helped Elon Musk buy X,
it was Larry Ellison and Larry Ellison is huge in
the surveillance states. So the majority of this conversation right
now through now pull Jones. Yeah, I think he invests
like a billion dollars with Elon Musk. You gotta understand,
Elon muss is just a front man. There's a bunch
of private investors that are investing with him right there,
And the majority of this conversation is happening on x
which is a giant honey trap, so they could see
where the dissident is at.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and just to give people like a little bit
of context here, in q tel was started after the
Patriot Act, right, the Patriot Act, because in nine you
know the whole thing, right, we know the story there.
And when inqtel started, what was the first investment They
made one point five million dollars in two Palentier, Okay,
And what happened.
Speaker 1: After that, right inqtel started Oracle. That's how Oracle started.
Speaker 2: Larry Ellison's company was funded by Inktel, the same venture
capitalist arm that funded Palenteer. So then you look at Facebook, Okay,
Mark Zuckerberg, he got paid five hundred thousand dollars to
drop out of Facebook by Peter Thiel in two thousand
and four and then lifeflog shuts down and he goes
and files the LLC for Facebook. So this is the
you know, as you extrapolate here, and Elon Musk also
did something similar to what we're talking about where he
tells his employees any discrepancies, problems, or complaints you have,
we want to know, Like you know, they're pretty big
about that, and so I I want to know the
statistics of how many people get canned after that or
just hate their life, right, So I'm curious about that
because it seems that we are looking looking at the
same kind of people, right.
Speaker 3: And the interesting thing you mentioned Oracle, which Larry Elson
is playing a major role within ushering this in and
he was kind of behind the scenes for a long time.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 3: But if you had there's actually an article about this
on gizmo and they have the documents a PDF of
them where Oracle was a CIA project for three years
before they rolled it out for public consumption. It was
actually titled Project Oracle.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 2: How is it possible that inqtel can fund like the
Patriot Acts made it possible for the CIA to fund
their own companies into the public space in the public
sector that's unprecedented.
Speaker 1: It's just unprecedented. Yeah.
Speaker 3: I think what they did was is they kind of
outsourced all the things that would be illegal for the
government to do to these quasi public private cutouts, which
you would call Silicon Valley. So Silicon Valley, you know.
And the weird thing is is that we submit to
all of it. Every time we download an app, we
hit the green button and in that long list of
words that you're agreeing to, surveillance is part of it,
data collection is part of it, right, or you have
the flock cameras that have the database, but the police
have access to that database. So literally, the CIA outsourced
all the surveillance stuff that I think under the law,
if they ever followed the law, they are not allowed
to do but to say, hey, our hands are clean,
we're not doing it. But it's all these companies that
they funded and they created, and there's a back door
to all these companies for.
Speaker 2: Them, exactly. And when you study the World wars, dude,
it's the same thing. The Industrial Revolution came in from rich,
powerful families, industrialist families that came in extractor resources, became
rich off the backs of labor workers, and then you know,
you had, of course the world first World War, and
then that just completely destroyed, you know, and impoverished a
lot of people, and then you had another world war
because of that, because of the robber barons that were
coming in these industrialist families, the same people that are
doing this today and transitioning us into this Fourth Industrial
Revolution as they call it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, I remember, very early on in my
diving into conspiracies, there's a video that I watched and
this guy said something that held true to me. He's like,
if you ever want to know why something happened, don't
listen to the talking heads while it's happening. Pay attention
to what happens as a result, because that was always
the intended consequence. So once there's a few years and
you see how, you know, I always say, if you
want to know why something happens, pay attention to how
people react, because that was what they wanted to happen.
Speaker 1: So, yeah, it's all fake and lame.
Speaker 3: It's why I just say, you know, reject it all,
and you know, follow the truth here I believe, you know,
is Jesus Christ or Messiah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I just think that, you know, and that's
my thing like I don't like to call out people
per se, but I do understand the Hegelian dialect, and
it's always problem reaction, solution, get people to react that
we can enact our solution. And so I always am
looking at people's rhetoric and going, where does this lead?
Where's the evolution of this thought process go? And if
it always leads towards this kind of police state or
this kind of galvanization behind something that would justify please state,
then I have to go this guy's a shill.
Speaker 1: I mean, what else are we going to do? Man?
Speaker 2: So it's like, I don't know, It's sorry, it's logic.
So let's play a little Larry Ellison. But this all
feeds into the Albert Pike letter that we're going to
pull up in a minute, which talks about the uh desigonist.
Speaker 1: Well, we'll talk about that minute. Let's play Larry Elson.
Speaker 4: Citizens will be on their best behavior because we're constantly
and repeat everything that's going on, and it's it's unimpeachable.
The cars, the cars have cameras, cameras on them, all right,
I think we have a squad car here someplace. But
those kind of applications using a if we can use
a and we're using aid to monitor the video. So
if that altercation that occurred to the recording Memphis, the
chief of police would be immediately notified. It's not people
that are looking at those cameras, it's Ali, do just
look at the camera. No, no, no, you can't do this.
It would be like a shooting that's gonna be immediately.
That's gonna be an event that's immediately, an alarm is
gonna go off, it's gonna be and we're gonna we're
gonna have supervision. And there was every police officer is
going to be supervised at all times.
Speaker 2: Super vision. The way he enunciated that was interesting. It
is a panopticon, is what it is. And I don't
think that they they it's not gonna be it's gonna
be minority report.
Speaker 1: We'll catch you before you do it.
Speaker 2: It has nothing to do with this aspect of like, oh,
when something happens, then we'll get you.
Speaker 3: You know, well, think about this what you just said,
and remember they create the problem. They throw fire on
the gasoline, I mean to the reaction, and then their
solution is always more federal overreached with the surveillance and right.
What led to police officers wearing those cameras on their chests?
Speaker 1: Well, we remember there was like a year or two.
Speaker 3: Period where should all those white officers going after those
black people? And there's all these big you know, to
do's about it and stuff like that, and there's really
a public perception out there that these policemen where and
I'm not saying they are or they're not. They're out
of control. They're doing all this horrible stuff. So what
do we need to do. We need to put flawed
cameras on them, and people a yeah, let's do it.
Let's do it. And that's just ushering in more of
the surveillance states. So he's telling you what you want
to hear. We'll keep these police, you know, under control.
They're not gonna be doing bad stuff. But guess what
they're also doing. They're surveiling everything that we do too,
and ultimately that's what they want for their data harvesting,
for their pre crime system that they're trying to usher in.
Speaker 2: That's right, And I'm so glad you brought that up, dude,
because man, I'm so glad you brought this up because
I've actually been looking into this. So people keep talking
about the IDF and how they're training our police officers.
Speaker 1: Right, Okay, so you just said what.
Speaker 2: Year did Axon start putting their cameras onto police officers?
Speaker 1: Well that was twenty fourteen. Do you know when that? Why?
That was?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 1: Why?
Speaker 2: Well that was because of the Mike Brown shooting. Do
you sing about Mike Brown? Oh?
Speaker 1: I remember that. I'm from there.
Speaker 2: I literally lived there, right, like literally in that like
I was five. I lived five minutes away from where
Mike Brown got killed. Like I could have heard the
gun shot from my backyard and so like the tear
gas in my backyard from the riots, the whole deal, right,
and so point being, I remember the parade that they had,
and they had like some weird conspiracy that they were
actually you know, there was like Democratic un people or
whatever that were actually practicing this parade before the shooting
had happened. And then they had all these things like
made as soon as it happened, pretty much because people
were like, how did they get all this shit made?
And they're already doing this parade or whatever. Right, there's
a lot of weird shit that happened here. But what
happened right after this was you had riots in New York.
You had them in all these different areas at one
time in twenty four remember that.
Speaker 1: Oh it was nuts.
Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, And I remember like I was in some
of the crazy protests, like right, just because like I'm
eighteen and I want to go see like what's happening,
you know what I mean. I was a wild boy,
and I was like, what's going on? You know, I
mean throwing you know, I saw people Anyway, it was crazy.
I could tell stories about that whole situation. But point being,
even the Mike Brown story itself is a whole episode.
Speaker 1: You know, it's insane. They left that guy out there
all day.
Speaker 2: You know, it was a big humiliation, a big demoralization
ritual so that they could enact what we're talking about here,
which is a police surveillance state, and you know, civilian
surveillance state.
Speaker 1: But point being, the IDF was training the police in
twenty fourteen. It's nuts. This goes back to twenty fourteen.
Speaker 2: Man, the idea has been training our police officers since
the Mike Brown shootings.
Speaker 1: So first of all, let's look at this.
Speaker 2: What year did the significant did the axon which, by
the way, Trump has a lot of investment in the Axon,
which is the body camera company.
Speaker 3: Well, that's what's so funny about Axon, And I wonder,
and I said this tongue in cheek, but I was like,
I wonder if Axon is behind the recent movement to
tear down all the flot cameras.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: So twenty fourteen, twenty fourteen, after the shooting of Michael
Brown and Ferguson heightened the public demand for transparency and accountability.
By twenty sixteen, nearly half of US law enforcement agencies
had adopted body cameras.
Speaker 1: Okay, so let me see if I can find this
and real quick and real quick.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying that body cameras are a bad thing.
What I'm saying is that this is one reason that
they will use to usher in the surveillance state. Right,
So it's like a stepping stone to the surveillance state.
You based off what Larry Ellison said, right, because like, hey,
guess what, the police officers will be controlled. They'll be
on their best but you know behavior, and everybody's like, yes, yes,
that's good because of.
Speaker 1: All the horrible things they were doing.
Speaker 3: So in no way do I think that they're bad
I'm just saying I think they use these events as
a pre curve sure to usher these things in.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: And let me see if I can find this because
I have it on my phone. I had it as
a saved bookmark, but I don't have it on here.
But there was a twenty fourteen news article that discussed
the IDF training are police. But right now all I'm
finding is Israel prepares major military operation in West Bank
after four Postinians and two Israelis killed. It's just in
talking about Mom, Donnie, Mom Donnie. Uh okay, so it's
not going to show it to me, but crazy shit's
going on. By the way, Trump just like fell out
of his limo, like right before we started this, really, like,
I don't know, he like collapsed.
Speaker 3: You think Trump makes it all for the next two
and a half years.
Speaker 2: Remember the Simpsons episode where like he was like dead
in a casket. Yeah, Like, wasn't that while he was president?
Speaker 1: Oh? I don't know, because I'm pretty sure it was.
It was.
Speaker 2: I'm almost positive it was like right around pretty much.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Well, they are rolling out jd Vance to kind of
save his hopes for twenty twenty eight, going off on
show Rogan going on Joe Rogan and speaking the truth
and all that type of stuff, and like, wait a minute,
you're a shill, you're funded by Peter Thiel. And once
again we got to ask ourselves. And I don't think that,
you know, the mainstream afterward media does this.
Speaker 1: Why are they saying these things like why is.
Speaker 3: A person who's a puppet to Peter Thiel exposing the truth?
And I think I think we both agree they're exposing
the truth so we lose faith in the system so
they can usher in their new one.
Speaker 1: No, that's right, dude. I mean it's so weird.
Speaker 2: It's like, what the hell this guy just completely sits down, dude.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, he just like sits down. Crazy.
Speaker 2: Wow, he's old, but it's very odd, like he's just
standing there and just collapses, so like he wasn't doing anything,
he just collapses. So anyway, I just want to point
that out. But yeah, I mean it is a weird
uh thing here, you know. So let's show that Albert
Pike because we've kind of talked about the technocratic combination
of shills and Zionist New World Order regime.
Speaker 1: So let's talk about this letter and then we'll cover
some of this crusade shit. But this letter always amazes me.
Speaker 3: Whether it's Albert Pike or not, whoever wrote it is
spot on.
Speaker 2: Yeah, bro, I mean, come on, you can't you know
it doesn't again again it goes back to the whole
fruit of the works kind of thing, right, Yeah, yeah,
fruit of the tree.
Speaker 1: I don't care. You know, nobody can tell the future.
Speaker 2: So if this is happening, then clearly somebody's manipulating outcomes.
Speaker 1: Oh absolutely.
Speaker 5: And a letter to twenty two January eighteen seventeen, Massini
wrote to Pike.
Speaker 1: Now, Albert Pike is this high mason.
Speaker 5: Who wrote the manual, if you like, of Scottish Free Masonry.
Speaker 1: He said the following.
Speaker 6: We must allow all of the federations to continue just
as they are. It must appear as things are as
things were in the beginning, with their systems, their central authorities,
and divers most of correspondence between high grades of the
same right, organized as they are at present.
Speaker 5: But we must create a super right which.
Speaker 6: Will remain unknown to which we will call those masons
of high degree.
Speaker 1: Oo.
Speaker 2: That's from the book Angels and Demons, right there, dude.
I used to love that book bro that says Illuminati
both forward backwards, upside.
Speaker 1: Down, and right side up like the movie.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's so cool the way that they did that,
where it's like I forgot what they're called. They're like
some grams something gram you know, like enneagram or whatever, Graham. Uh,
but essentially that word spells out Illuminati no matter which
way you turn it. Oh wow, yeah, because you could
see how it mirrors itself.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so it's perfectly symmetrical in a weird way. It's
very crazy, dude. I used to love reading that book.
Did I read that book of like twelve years old?
Speaker 1: I was brilliant. I was really into weird shit.
Speaker 2: But I was really into the Illuminati after that, of course,
and because the whole books about that. But point being, yeah,
this probably wasn't Albert Pike. It really doesn't matter because
somebody could have attributed it to Albert Pike and that
person still be a powerful uh you know, a person
who's you know writing it.
Speaker 3: Oh, absolutely right, I mean it just adds to it
adds to the lore of Albert Pike, which is a
master mason, and maybe that's part of that like nonlinear warfare, right,
Like why are they exposing this letter that's attributed to
this high ranking Masons. When you think that Masons are
in control the world, Like, why are they even bringing
this up to the public, Right, how did they even resurface?
Speaker 1: Right? Yeah, I know, yeah exactly.
Speaker 2: Somebody people wanted people to know about it, because people
have talked about this for years.
Speaker 6: Yeah, you shall select with regard to our brothers in Masonry.
Speaker 5: These men must be.
Speaker 7: Pledged to this sticktus secrecy. Through this supreme right, we
will govern all free Masonry, which will become the one
international center, the more powerful because its direction will be unknown. Now,
Albert Pike wrote a letter to Mancini and that was
dated August fifteenth, eighteen seventy one, in which it propagated
that there should be.
Speaker 6: A world order, a one order, where all nations are
under the control of one central organization.
Speaker 5: And in order to achieve this they planned and there
are numerous quotes for this. So I put a number
on the screen because some will say I don't trust this,
I don't trust.
Speaker 1: That, I don't trust the other.
Speaker 5: There are references down there, there are references up there.
Speaker 1: There will be references.
Speaker 2: I mean, this is back whenever you could get more
information about it. It seems on the subject, you know, because
we've had a whitewash. Who is I don't know exactly,
but I know that he's got something. I mean, look
at this intelligence officer in the world. Canadian Navy talked
about this. William Guy Carr, former intelligence officer, talked about this. So,
I mean, that's I guess important enough. Right, let me
go ahead and pull up some of these what the
world wars.
Speaker 3: Yeah, when you read it, you're like, holy crap, this
actually is happening.
Speaker 1: That's right, that's right. So this is the alleged letter here.
Speaker 2: The First War, of course, was about breaking we must
be brought in in order to permit the Illuminati to
overthrow the powers of the Czars in Russia. And so
of course we know that happened. They killed the czars.
This was written before that, right, So then they could
put in a fortress of atheistic communism, which is also
something that happened. The divergence is caused by the agent
tour or agents of the Illuminati between the British and
Germanic empires will be used to foment this war. At
the end of the war, communism will be built and
used in order to destroy the order the other governments
in the order to weaken the religions. So that's really
ultimately the point here, right, is the religions. That's the
ultimate enemy, all right. And so then after that you
have the Second World War, which was about fomented by
taking advantage of the differences between the fascist and political Zionists.
Speaker 1: We see that happen.
Speaker 2: Of course, the Nazism is destroyed and political Zionism is
strong enough to be instituted in a sovereign state of
Israel and Palestine. So of course during the Second World War,
international communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christiandom,
which it has. Socialism, communism, they're the same thing. Yeah,
So then the Third World War, this is what we're
talking about today, must be fomented by taking advantage of
the differences caused by the agent tour of the illuminati.
So from the past two World wars between the political
Zionists and the leaders of the Islamic world, the war
must be inducted in such a way that Islam and
political Zionism mutually destroy each other. And we see everybody
hates Zionists, or they hate Islam or they love Islam
or they hate Zien or love Zionists. Right, So isn't
that exactly what they're laying out here?
Speaker 1: Oh one hundred percent, they're laying that out.
Speaker 3: Just look at the Middle East right now, and I'll
tell you who we should really pay attention to and
all this stuff. I'm always talk about Israel and Iran,
But if they are trying to manufacture biblical prophecy and
follow the script or at least their interpretation of it,
pay attention to what's going on in Turkey right now,
because based off is Eco thirty eight of the bloodlines
that they mentioned that's actually in modern day Turkey and
order On at this point is very vocal about being
a speaker for the Muslim world and that it's his
job to end this, you know, Zionist state of Israel.
They're out of control and he's been very vocal about it.
And they're actually a huge country. They have a made
your role within Europe being that bridge over to eastern
Europe to a certain extent from the West, and uh yeah,
pay attention to I personally think pay attention to what
is going to happen through Turkey. I wonder if Turkey
is going to come to the aid of Iran somehow,
at some point, and it's going to kick this thing off.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they've been talking a lot about Turkey.
Speaker 2: Either you have the traditionalist like out Alexander Dugan who
says that NATO needs to be destroyed, we need to
get Turkey out of NATO, or you have this zionist
saying NATO needs to be destroyed, we need Turkey out
of NATO. So it's interesting because they both seem to
pose against each other, yet they have the same goals
and so that's you know, again, judge it by the fruits.
These guys are not against each other. It's a false dialectic. Oh,
being let in by yes and being let in by
the same occultist Freemasonic type Illuminati figures, which by the way,
the Illuminati is only the brotherhood of the Illumined Ones,
which could include people of the Night Si Malta, people
of the Freemasons, people of all kinds of cults or societies.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I think they're all working together, right, I think,
of course, yeah, because I mean I think, you know,
if you talk about the control structure of the world,
I have a biblical view of that, so I think,
according to the Bible, you have these powers and principalities
that rule over different regions of the world, and under
their control are these ancient bloodlines that make the upper
echelon of these royal orders or these secret societies, and
they battle back and forth for control, money, stuff like that.
I think ultimately, at least at this point from what
I can see, is that they're all in the same
page and somebody like in every WWF event, you have
your hero and then you have the heel, and that
changes depending on what side or what part of the
region of the earth you're from. But to me, it
looks almost orchestrated, and just go back to like with Putin.
Right like, Putin comes out he's super anti Zionists and
stuff like that, and then the video gets shown of
his rabbi from Hbad claiming that Putin runs every single
thing he wants to do in the Middle East through them.
So how can you really be at odds with them
when you're still running everything pass them? And it's all
because it's one big magic trick if you.
Speaker 2: Ask me, that's right, And then you know and when
he says he poses against the ross Childs where they
do you know, I mean, come on, they're the same thing.
So this is what this is, you know what we're
talking about here. Meanwhile, the other nations, once more divided
on the issues, will be constrained to fight to the
point of complete physical, moral, spiritual, and economical exhaustion. We
should at least the nihilists and the atheists, and we
shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm, which, in all its horror,
will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism,
origin of savagery. And by the way, guys, this sounds
like a freemason wrote it. Because they hate atheists more
than any thing. Why they want you to worship the architect, right, Yes,
they hate atheists more than Christians because they know they
can at least convert a Christian. Right, there's a chance
you can get a Christian to be a mystic. There's
no chance you can get an atheist to be a mystic.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: And so showing through the bloody turmoil what they call
the origin of savagery being atheism, by generating atheism, by
using five OHO one c threes to destroy the modern
day Christian you know, movement into what it's been, this
degradation and then you know, now people hate either Christianity
or they're in some bullshit version of it to where
they could easily be swayed out of it into this
Luciferian doctrine.
Speaker 1: Do you see what I'm going with that? Oh?
Speaker 3: Absolutely, I think they're purposely trying. I think they're going
to eventually blame everything on the Abrahamic face. Right, So
think about that what they're talking on this letter. You
have this war of the Zionists, which are made up
of Christians and Jews. You have the Muslim world going
at it. And let's just take for example, they have
a giant war that just destroys everything. Well, what are
they going to do. They're going to blame it on
the Bible. They're going to blame it on the Abrahamic religions.
And I think that's what will usher in this Luciferian doctrine,
this mystery babylon alien coult.
Speaker 1: That's right, blame it on the religions.
Speaker 2: And also, you know, the atheists have already kind of
been blamed, haven't they. I mean, people are now doing
this new movement towards Christianity because of the atheistic culture
we've had for the past you know, fifteen years, right,
so I think that part has already happened kind of.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: So then everywhere are the citizens Oh sorry, go ahead, Well, I.
Speaker 3: Meanter just think about this. I mean, you're seeing this
in real time. Because of all the atheist stuff and
all the you know, demonic stuff that's going on in
the world. I think there's people who were once atheist
to your point, that are now turning to the various religions,
specifically Christianity, and that plays into the hands of these
powerful leads that can then mold and control people within
these institutions of religion.
Speaker 2: That's right, And as you see here it says then
everywhere the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world
minority of revolutionaries will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and
the multitude disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from
that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an
ideal but without knowing where to render its adoration, will
receive the true light of the universal manifestation of the
pure doctrine of Lucifer. There it is, and that's exactly
what we're talking about, right. So brought finally out into
the public view. This manifestation will result from the general
reactionary reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity
and atheism. So again, I'm always looking at the reactionaries
because that's how they work. I'm only dude, I only
go off their blueprint.
Speaker 1: Bro.
Speaker 2: You know, I study these guys for a long time
and now I understand like how they operate.
Speaker 1: So I have no beef with any person.
Speaker 2: I just look at the overall blueprint and I go
that person seems like an agent, whether they know it
or not. Right, the agentis, as he calls it, of
the Illuminati.
Speaker 3: Well that's the beauty of knowing the endgame, because if
you know the endgame, you can then start to make
sense of the people who are talking. And then you
ask yourself, well, I know they're telling me some truth,
but does this also align with or can this lead
to the endgame that I know that's happening. And when
you start looking with this holy war stuff, whether it's
you know, Alex Jones or Sneako or throwing Nick Fuentes
or you know, any of these people throwing the Zionists, right,
there's nothing more that design is like like Benjapiro than
having Alex Jones go out there and saying all.
Speaker 1: Muslims are horrible and we're in a holy war, you know.
Speaker 3: So for me, once I see that someone's talking points
align with the end goal, I immediately become suspect. And
that doesn't mean that everybody who promotes those things are
part of intelligence or anything like that. I think there
are true idea logues within the movement. Uh, But nonetheless,
if it ends up and you know their endgame, we
should start to pause a second and just say, I'm
not going to follow them. I'm gonna listen to what
they're gonna say, but I'm not going to follow them
because it's a trap.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I can follow nobody that you know, follow your discernment.
Speaker 1: That's what I do. And what the hell that's a
right there? That's AI. I do want to say this
all aid. That's good. AI. I'm not gonna lie. You know,
there's a I out there that I could easily tell.
That's that is good. You don't know if you're coming
or going, and yeah, anymore.
Speaker 3: And I think also, at least from what I understand
about history and revolutions and always having a hidden hand
behind it. Uh, there are gonna be people within this
media sphere, these influencers who are going to call for
a revolution. Many have, especially when you talk about the
I guess you would say the occupation of the American
government or the perceived occupation of the American government, especially
with the combination or the fusing of the Israeli military.
Speaker 1: And the American military. And I heard this one guy.
Speaker 3: I don't want to throw shade on him, but like whatever,
he's like, the only solution is a revolution, and you
know it's correct. But the question is, are the people
who are calling for revolution going to be put in
their bodies on the front line or are they going
to call for other people's blood to be spilled?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 3: And to me that's supersions. Whether it's for your cause
or for the Zionist cause, you're still calling for other
people to spill their blood. And to me, that's why
it's important to understand the world or the human experience
through a biblical worldview, because if you don't, you can
fall for this trap.
Speaker 1: Right. No, that's for sure. Man. Yeah, welcome in, Daniel.
How you doing, man?
Speaker 2: Faith of that works is dead? You're preaching another gospel.
I must be talking about. I don't know who he's
talking about. Definitely not us, because we don't preach gospels here.
Let's pull up a little bit of this crusade action
and see what we got going on. This is like
a twenty minute thing, so let me see if I
can find because there was some good clips from the
actual interview with Sneako and Alex Jones.
Speaker 1: Dude, I watched it. I saw that too. Yeah, I
watched like the whole thing, and it was just it's
a joke. That's another thing.
Speaker 3: Performative. It's performative. They're both kind of laughing. They both
look themonically possessed. Absolutely, And that's why I just either
shake my head or pull my hair out, because I
don't understand how other people within the conspiracy theory, you know,
sphere or the truth or sphere can look in that
and go this is not serious, this is a joke
and then take it one step further.
Speaker 1: Why are these people doing this?
Speaker 2: So I look at this and I go again, I'm
not I'm not in this world, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: I'm examining and studying it, right, And.
Speaker 2: So when I see Angelo Groper say, what a funny name?
Say that Nick Fuentez cries laughing at Alex Jones destroying Sneako.
At no point in that whole video did I see
him destroy Sneako. All I saw him was he gave
like low iq arguments about Islam that actually kind of
drove anybody with any kind of level of like thinking
ability towards Sneako because he had no good arguments. And
then everybody that agreed with him are just like idiots,
you know, that are being galvanized, like useful idiots.
Speaker 1: So let's watch a little bit of this. It's it's insane.
Speaker 2: So these are the three guys, by the way, that
are that are that are you that are coming in
and in ushering this in. By the way, it's Fuentes,
Alex Jones, and Sneako who are like in.
Speaker 3: This movement here and yeah, and real quick before he
watched his understand that Alex Jones looks like an OP
right in Full Wars looks like some types intelligence OP.
You have Nick Fuentes who's tied to cat Boy Intelligence.
I don't know exactly who funds him, but it's connected
to the cat Boys. And then you have this Nico
character who became Muslim because Alex because of Andrew Tate
R Right, who was all part of the red spill,
red pill movement, Like these are the people who are
now pushing this crusade, which is why we have to
be suspect of it all.
Speaker 1: And he calls himself, well, I shouldn't say that.
Speaker 2: He talks just like Andrew Tate, by the way, like
he started, Yeah, he started doing this thing where his
cadence in the way he would speak and say words
became just like Andrew Tate, And I'm like, what is
this weird shit that I'm watching?
Speaker 1: You know?
Speaker 3: Also he started wearing that after this crusade thing started
happening and people were like calling to deport Sneako or whatever,
although he's an American citizen. He also started wearing the
black suit and tie like kind of performing like he's
Malcolm X or something.
Speaker 2: Yes, yeah, yeah, he's like, he's like Lex Friedman, I
don't know, all right, let's pull this up.
Speaker 1: You can deport me if Sean Strickler can knock me down. Huh,
you can't stop me.
Speaker 8: I'm coming up, then tell me I'm coming He like.
Speaker 1: What is it?
Speaker 2: This is what I'm saying, Like, this is what this
is just performative. And and how are they saying that
he's destroying him with this.
Speaker 1: Slavery that we take.
Speaker 9: The web in chalah In you become abdul Alex.
Speaker 1: Jones and look at his face. Dude, this is insane.
In shah La, you're gonna be doing this. So he's
over here doing this weird Muslim ship. Yeah, it's just insane. Man.
They both are possessed by demons.
Speaker 3: And one guy in the comments real quick, we were
talking about how they're all kind of working together. I'm
the same place and because I don't think there, you know,
envy comes into play and they're not really on the
same page. I think the way they're all on the
same page is because of demonic possession, right, I think
the demons are all on the same page, and I
think at some point at the very top, they're merely
vessels for demonic activity.
Speaker 2: I you know, I had it's so funny to say that.
I actually had a funny take today with Doc Brown.
We had on a Prometheus report. I opened up. Okay,
let me frame it this way. Every Friday, we do
a show in the morning. It's a news show for
anybody who hasn't seen it.
Speaker 1: Check it out. It's great Prometheus report. We talk about
all the current events.
Speaker 2: Give it a different spin because I'm looking at shit
from a different angle.
Speaker 1: But I was like, dude, we should do like a
segment because.
Speaker 2: Every time I get home, like you know, I'm getting
home in the morning at shower and I'm like thinking
that I think of shit in the shower.
Speaker 1: Who doesn't, right, that's what everybody does.
Speaker 2: And this morning I had a thought, dude, and it's
a hot take, and a lot of people are gonna
love this when they hear it first, So just hear
me out. Okay, I haven't fully fleshed this thought out yet,
but I do feel like something in it is true.
I don't believe in demonic possession. Now, let me explain
that I believe in demonic possession in the biblical sense
of like it can happen to you, But the process
of it happening, I believe, is you actually accepting. So,
for instance, we don't control our thoughts, right, we have
thoughts that we can't control. But how much are you
giving those thoughts entertainment? How much are you applying those
thoughts in opening yourself.
Speaker 1: Up to them? And that I believe leads.
Speaker 2: To a personality change that is demonic possession because of this,
because I believe that we do have thoughts that come
to us from entities, oh, demons, but I don't think
they have the power to possess you without you giving
them the power, is what I'm trying to explain here.
And so there's something to this where I'm like, yeah,
I don't believe in demonic possession as far as like
you're a victim.
Speaker 1: It just happened to you.
Speaker 2: You were just walking around one day and then the
demon hopped in you and you became possessed.
Speaker 1: There's, yes, there is an aspect of give and go.
Speaker 2: There's an aspect of like, you know, give and take
with that, and I think that you have to do
something in order to become that way.
Speaker 1: That's just my opinion, you know.
Speaker 3: So I can't prove this right, I really can't, but
I believe this right. It's not a hill that I'm
going to die on, but I really believe this. I
think at the upper echelon, right, when you're talking about
the highest level of Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, you know, Shabbad got yeah,
you name it, the Jesuits, I think at the very top.
To reach the highest levels uh throwing the Royal Families,
if you will, you have to go through some type
of ritual where you actually invite the demon into your
body to be a vessel. I really believe that to
be true. I believe to be true of the Royal Families,
that's right.
Speaker 2: So when we talk about alien possession and things like that,
it's like, dude, stop, you're giving this boogeyman too much power.
And isn't that always what it is. There's some boogeyman
that they want you to be scared of. This is
another one of those things, this whole demonic possession or
alien you know, abduction and all these things are Yeah,
in my opinion, that's just all it is. It's another
boogeyman to get you to give over your free your
own control that you have.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, but I.
Speaker 3: Do believe it's real, and I believe that our behavior
can open up windows for this possession to take place.
Speaker 1: I do believe that. Yeah. Hell yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: It's a funny thought I had because it's like I
know that there's biblically something there, and I know it's real.
I know there's entities that affect your mind and try
to get into your soul, but it's like it can't.
Speaker 1: You have more.
Speaker 2: Power than you know, you have literally God, your God's child.
And if that's the case, they have nothing over you
unless you give it to them.
Speaker 1: And that's really how I feel.
Speaker 2: You know, nothing can touch you, you know what I mean,
as long as you're strong within your your connection with
your creator.
Speaker 1: You know, yeah, absolutely the Holy Spirit protects us from that.
Speaker 2: And you don't have to be like some biblical dogmatic,
you know, crazy Christian either, you know what I mean
to have that happen. It's really just a connection that
you have with God that you know, you read the
Bible a little bit and see what pops out at you,
and you know, you study with what what it feels like.
But I think some people, like AA or like anything else,
they like to make it their whole identity, which is great.
But I also think that there's an aspect of like
opening yourself up to other people in a way where
you're not dogmatic and in a way where they could be.
Speaker 1: Think about it this way. If I go and hit some.
Speaker 2: Regular, normal person and start talking about how they're trying
to put nanoparticles inside your brains that they could start
sending information into your mind. People will look at me
like I'm crazy if I go straight to the deep end, right,
But if I just kind of talk about surface level
stuff and work them down, that's cool. And I'm just
saying that sometimes I think people could be a little
abrasive in their ideas, even when it comes to God
or Christianity, and so we've got to be more open
to people.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I would say, because there's some things, especially in
my spiritualis where I am dogmatic about it. But there
needs to be a sense of humility as well. Yes,
right when interacting with people, Like, I'm not going to
change what I believe for other people, but when discussing
things with people, be humble about it. And if ultimately
our goal, at least my goal is to you know,
spread the Gospel to people. I use real life scenarios
or conspiracies ultimately to point to that. But if you
lead with this dogmatic abrasive in your face, you're evil.
You're going to hell this this and that it's not
gonna work. They're not gonna listen to you. A wall
is gonna go up and they're just gonna reject everything
you said. So, yeah, I'm with you on that, especially
when we're trying to bring the truth to people, Like when.
Speaker 2: Tucker Carlson says that, now I may agree with this,
I'm gonna be honest, I agree with this. But when
Tucker Carlson goes, you know, abortion is child sacrifice, I go, Okay, cool,
your jets a little bit. I agree, but like that's
a crazy thing to say when you're trying to like
get people to you know, you know what I'm saying. Like,
that's my point, Like when you go full to the
deep end, it tends to send people the other way,
which sometimes I think is the point.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm with you. I'm against abortion. I do think
it's some type of child's sacrifice. But I wouldn't just
go tell people that. What I would say is this.
And I remember I used to be an atheist, a
big time atheists, and I was pro abortion right and
I just thought to myself, Well, if you stop somebody's
heart anywhere other than the room, it's considered murder, but
in the womb, it's considered abortion, and it's completely legal.
And then that didn't sit right with me, right that
that would be hypocritical. So that's how you know, I
came to the realization that, you know, killing an innocent
child is wrong without hammering somebody in the head and
sound like a crazy person at first, that person you.
Speaker 2: Know, yeah, I mean, you know, you see a literal
spark of light whenever somebody insiminates somebody, right, So there's
something there.
Speaker 1: There's life.
Speaker 2: As we've covered on this show with the Blue Light episode.
Speaker 1: You know, your body.
Speaker 2: Creates light from life, from the life in your body,
it creates its own UV light, which means that if
there's light showing itself whenever you're inciminated, there's life there
because it's impossible to happen with out there being a
force moving. So it's very interesting because yeah, the Blue
Light shit is crazy. I don't know if you saw
that episode.
Speaker 1: Man, it's nuts. Let's see what these idiots have to say.
Speaker 3: Yeah, dude, and people are loving.
Speaker 1: This shit, yeah, yeah, yeah, they love it. I mean,
I'm not gonna lie. I even loved it.
Speaker 2: I was like, this is absolutely insane because I know
what he's doing. But it's also like, man, it's really hard.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean I laugh at it, not because he's funny,
but because it's so ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Yes, absolutely. It's not even like, oh.
Speaker 2: Man, this guy's the truth, right, It's more like it's
more like, oh my god, Like what a mockery he's
making of everything he's done up until now with doing this.
Speaker 1: It's it's absolutely insane.
Speaker 2: And what's crazier to me is he's doing all this
after losing everything but perceivably percon peably I should put
that to sleep, and losing everything, right, So it's like,
come on, man, this guy's more controlled.
Speaker 1: Ever.
Speaker 8: Yeah, you cannot, Like I said, you see, Alex starts yelling,
tries to.
Speaker 1: Make me down. You can't stop me.
Speaker 2: I'm coming then tell me I'm coming on all right,
he's going back through it. Yeah, I don't you know,
it's just crazy, dude. It's like, let's see what else
we got here. He's just going back.
Speaker 3: Did you see how Sneako had to take a time
out and they went over to Saudi Arabia and walked
around that black cube and then he came back and
he's like everybody says, if you love, uh, you know
the Middle you know the Middle East so much, and
hate America, why don't you just move there, and why
he was out there? He goes, well, I thought about that,
but then I thought I had a greater mission in life,
and that's to turn the entire you know, all of
America to become Muslim. And really, yeah, and once again,
that's never going to happen, especially the abrasive way that
he's doing it.
Speaker 1: So I just have to question his motives right there.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And this is like, guys, I know that we're
older and older.
Speaker 1: I am like thirty, but we're like, you know, I'm.
Speaker 2: Old enough to understand that this is not most people's life,
and this is not in most people's world.
Speaker 1: But understand this.
Speaker 2: For everybody thirty and under, everybody twenty eight, twenty seven,
twenty six and under that are young men who don't
really majority don't have girlfriends because of this new world
that they live in where they're sitting at home on
their phones. This is what they're seeing. They're seeing their heroes.
They're seeing these people fight with each other. For instance,
you have Clavicular and Steako, right, And that's another thing
that's these are popular people for these young kids, and
they're watching them fight. So it's splintering the young kids
off into these crazy, you know, revolutionary ideologies, and.
Speaker 1: This is real quick.
Speaker 3: The crazy thing right here is that and once again
we got to ask ourselves questions, is Sneako an idiot
or does he have an agenda? Because when Clovicular came out,
it's clear that he was part of this transhumanist movement.
It was clear that he was connected to Peter Thiel
and then he did that thing with the rabbi on it.
Speaker 1: But you know who.
Speaker 3: Still supported him, Stiko, He was friends with him and
it wasn't until he went to Israel that that was
a bridge too far.
Speaker 2: Well, kind of the thing is he was his ex
girlfriend said that he was super pardon me, is super
anti Semitic. That was actually like super anti Jews, super
pro Hitler, hole Hitler kind of guy. And now he's
actually working with the Zionist regime. Which again, if you
understand the nuance of this, what's the difference.
Speaker 1: There's no, that's no difference.
Speaker 2: That's when you that's when you get to understand, like
this guy still is a Nazi because the Nazis are
design I mean, there's no difference here.
Speaker 1: It's all the same global.
Speaker 3: But that distinction that we make is ultimately, what's going
to lead to that third war that that letter from
supposed to Albert talks about. It's that good versus bad paradigm,
And to me, that's just a fallacy, right, you know,
I don't believe in the good versus bad paradigm and
domestic politics, and I don't believe it in geopolitics, right, yeah,
And that's what they're really pushing here.
Speaker 1: So let's see here, we've got some interesting stuff going on.
And he's on Pierce Morgan.
Speaker 3: And this is one thing, right, this is colviciar is
the one thing I don't understand, right, because I mean
I'm older, right, But like, is he popular? Do people
really follow him or do they like to watch his
little clips because they think he's a train wreck. But
how he got on Pierce Morgan.
Speaker 1: Well, it's not hard to understand.
Speaker 2: Whenever you're getting pushed by the people who run the algorithms,
and you're connected with the people who run the algorithms,
you're getting shoved down people's throat to the point where
they're going to watch you. They're forced to. I was
forced to know who Clivicular was. It's not like I
searched this guy. This guy wouldn't get off of my feed,
and I'm like, who is this Like Clark Kent looking motherfucker?
Speaker 1: Dude, Like what's going on? You know? And that's what
it is, dude, So let's check what the city has
to say.
Speaker 7: He was, you know, extremely well received at the locals
there were extremely nice.
Speaker 1: And I had a good time.
Speaker 2: If you would apologize like, oh, it's it's echoing because
I guess I don't know, maybe it's his audio. I
don't know, So he's oh, I thought he was in
this with them, so he's just reacting.
Speaker 1: So they were saying that he ended up.
Speaker 2: Punching his set and going crazy in this over this,
So let's see what he says more performative stuff by sneak.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, yes, let's see here it's loading.
Speaker 3: Wait did JESU say he looks like a cut Kent
as in Joe Kent And if that's I kind of
see it.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, dude, Yes, they're both like Clark Kent.
Speaker 2: Yeah wow, good good call. Let me reload this ship.
All right, here we go. I'm gonna fast forward a little.
Speaker 1: Bit video because you were there.
Speaker 9: Obviously there's no one there like you're the brave soldier
for clubbing in Tel Aviv and getting paid for it.
Speaker 1: What a like? What an actual scumbag?
Speaker 7: Bro?
Speaker 9: And so many people aren't gonna say This's gonna say
you're burning a bridge because they want clout.
Speaker 1: Look like all scumbags.
Speaker 9: Scumbags, Bro, you're gonna turn a blind eye to this.
Speaker 1: What everyone sees is plainly obvious.
Speaker 9: Because you want to get clout, they always here's what
they're gonna say, You're burning a bridge.
Speaker 1: Secle loses his allies if.
Speaker 3: You think that, I'm gonna turn and I'm gonna ignore this,
so that for a content relationship, you lost your mind.
Speaker 1: But he nearded everything else. I don't think there's anything
more to because he knew for Jewish supremacists.
Speaker 9: I'm blistered a lot of dah, a lot of I'm
in the club, torquing in the club, being a good
little bitch for Israel. I don't know any better. I'm
just a stupid little looks Maxer, you fuck you man?
Speaker 1: Like bro sick. He's trying to sell it. You can
see he's trying to see it. Like in what world
does that make you furious? I know he's selling it.
He doesn't even look flushed in the face. He doesn't
look mad at all, dude, anyway, It's.
Speaker 2: Just it's it's performative if, as you said, dude, you
know what the fuck is this?
Speaker 3: I'm surprised he didn't say a host a lock a
lot of malaca at the end of that or whatever.
Speaker 1: They say.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, we also have apparently entertained exposed Sneko.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, this is funny. Right here is this him
exposing Sneako? And why is it going to play music
like that?
Speaker 3: Listen, I'm all one thing I want to say real quick.
I'm all for us all to Paul moment.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: I don't think that we should be judge for our
past if we truly are repentant for our ways, but
judge the fruit that comes after that repentance. And Sneako
is still acting like a major player within this influence
cultural wars that we're seeing.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, and it's it's at a heightened level
more than ever. You see the whole it's all splintering off,
which is the point of it, you know.
Speaker 3: And they all got clippers, and that's another thing. You
think these people's reach is natural? No, And unfortunately I
was looking at you know sneak o clips recently, and
now my entire timeline is filled with sneak o clippers
and they have like five or ten people that cut
and paste everything and then they uploaded and that's how
it gets all over the place. So all this stuff
is so unnatural.
Speaker 2: Well that's exactly what's going to happen to my feed
now that I just looked that up on this show here.
But you know, it's interesting, like yeah, like you say,
Andrew Tate had twenty six thousand fan accounts twenty six
let me say that, twenty six thousand fan pages, so
like when you have a fan page, they post everything
you post, and then he had twenty six thousand to those,
so he has like a clone of himself twenty six
thousand times. That made it to where you had to
see him everywhere, and when they tried to shut him
down and took him off of the Internet, that's why
you were still seeing him even when he got canceled.
So this guy was able to permeate the Internet no
matter what, which is interesting, like some of me does
think that maybe he's like the system is after him
for something, but also he's in the system, so it's
a weird thing where I just can't quite peg him
because I know he's involved with the crime syndicate ship Like,
it's so clear that he's got to be like mob tied.
But also he seems to have actually pissed off some
kind of elitist regime.
Speaker 3: I mean, but has he though, because we were saying,
because once I found out that the video of him
getting arrested appears to be AI, Yeah, right, then you're like,
this is all theater.
Speaker 1: That is that is fake. If it's fake, if that's fake,
that it's all theater. That's right.
Speaker 2: I mean that's where you kind of go, you know,
so this holy war, I don't actually let's go to
this first. Yeah, let me pull that back up. I
forgot about that. He has to stay about Let's see
what he has.
Speaker 3: Staybus means he's gotten self exposed and all these revelations
are going to come to life.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to tell you a very.
Speaker 2: Bad I can't even play it because it beats and
shiit whatever. All right, So yeah, he's gonna talk shit
about Sneako.
Speaker 3: The one thing I mean here, real real quick is
when regardless of what side of the argument that you're on,
right whether you're for the agenda, against the agenda, whatever,
you should listen to all these influencers talk about each
other because they're spitting truth. It's the problem is is
when we're so tribal that say, when say someone like
you know, people who like sneak O, if you know
Nick Quins comes out and says something about sneak O,
They're gonna go, ah, no, that's not true, that's not true.
Let's say you like Nick fin Sez, Sneako comes out
and says something about Nick Fuentes.
Speaker 1: You're oh, that's not true, that's not true.
Speaker 3: But in reality, what these two people are accusing each
other of is both true, which is why I've just
come to the conclusion that it's all fake and.
Speaker 1: Lanth I agree.
Speaker 2: So I guess two days ago Nick Fuentes was saying
the calling for this need to be Well, we'll move on,
but the saga continues with these guys.
Speaker 1: Dude.
Speaker 2: That's that's the point of this. It just goes on
and on and on and on. You can find this saga.
Speaker 1: Certainly unraveling coming on, don because you have to understand
how this all started. Guys.
Speaker 2: This started with one solid movement of young men that
were together America first, young men that were really trying
to like, you know, I guess the anti Zionists together
at first. Then it became this Jewish supremacy. And then
that's when Fointes splits off because he's like, you guys,
went too far for me, even though he's been a
closeted gay democrat the whole time shilling for the right.
And then you have you know this this now is
turning into this bigger thing where Alex Jones enters and
Andrew Tait and him at beef now, so it's splintering
off over and over again, even with him in clavicular.
So I just wonder what is this doing for the
young male You know, it's really making it to where
they can't galvanize behind any movement because they're all all
over the place, which might be the point of it is.
Speaker 3: Kas and recently, I think the next phase of this
crap talking is they're now all accusing each other to
being Jews. Nick flint As is this crypto Jew. This
guy's a crypto Jew. Dan Bazarian's a crypto Jew. You
can't trust any of it. There are all these accusations
at each other it's shit. I mean to me, it's comedy.
Speaker 2: Speaking of Jews, dude, we got ten Jews, ten jewels gold,
let's go.
Speaker 1: I don't even know what that is, dude, but that's awesome,
Thank you very much. Terror.
Speaker 2: I have no idea what the hell that is, but
that's dope, little a little present. Yeah, so let's move
on to a little bit more of the crusade aspect
of this.
Speaker 1: It's just again, you know, it's like, where does this go?
I don't know.
Speaker 2: I think it's chaos for the purpose of chaos. Yeah,
let me see here. Okay, get to the Alex Jones
Crusade two point zero. Maybe we could skip through some
of this and check it out. I was gonna pull
up like his interview with Fuentes, which is where he
first started talking about this. Well, maybe let me show this,
by the way, because this is not like something new.
Alex Jones has been talking about something adjacent to this
for a long time.
Speaker 1: Remember the Holy Wars T shirts.
Speaker 3: Oh, that came out a week after Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
That's right, and fake assassinated. I don't know, that's right.
And so it leads right into this. This thing that
we're in right here. I wonder if it's gonna open
up a different pay. Okay, here we go, Info Wars.
We're the Holy Holy Wars. I know they're on there
on the way. I had to look again. They're on
the website, but I used to have an image of
that that I made there.
Speaker 1: That's not it Holy Wars collection. Let's see what. Yeah,
there it is. Yeah, Crusader cross. There you go.
Speaker 2: And now we're in this Crusader right, you Shall Conquer
leather patch hat. There's a War on your Soul T shirt,
T shirt, so you know. And this guy, it's just
crazy because he's a little ahead ahead of the times
with this, almost like he had some kind of insider
information with where the narrative's heading.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Once again, I just think this is just more evidence
that behind every revolution is a hidden hand.
Speaker 1: And that's what we're laying out ultimately, that's what we're
pointing out here.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And it's an unpopular opinion, and I don't know why,
maybe because people are too tribal, But like I said,
once you see the world through this lens, it's hard
to unsee it.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: And he goes into like he just kind of elaborates
on the history of the empire, the Ottoman Empire and
how they took over it. And don't get me wrong, dude,
Like I really think that there's an aspect of this
where like you are going to be choosing between like
Noah Hyde or shea height law or whatever the fuck
it's called real law. And it's because of this false
dichotomy created by these Babylonian Jesuit types, right these you know,
it's all the same thing whenever you look at the
two Babylons and you understand that, like through the Catholics,
this is an aspect the Jesuits helped galvanize this new
version of like Islam that we see today.
Speaker 1: It all is a part of the same thing.
Speaker 2: So then when you look at this the taking over
the Middle East, how much of this was galvanized by
the Jesuits.
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 2: I don't know the full iteration of this history, but
I know that they had ties to this this movement.
Speaker 1: So yeah, And the one thing I want to say
this is it's.
Speaker 3: There are at the very top of all these movements,
there are people connected to intelligence, but the people who
are ultimately going to pay the price are the idea
logues that you know, whether their attentions are probably pure,
but the idea logues are going to fall for this,
and they're going to cause a lot of the damage.
Speaker 2: Right, No, for sure, Hey, shout out Sam Tripley. Man,
we shared our shit on X. That's awesome. I'm surprised,
you know, because we're talking ripping on ripping on Alex.
But hey man, that's what we do, man, you know.
But no, it's not even about again, not about him.
It's about this whole movement, this whole yeah scene that
we're looking at. We're just dissecting all the aspects, whether
it be Larry Ellison, Peter Thiel, Austin University, connections with
Jack Neil. You know, we could go anywhere with this
because it's all one movement that is rearing its head
in all these different ways. Right, So it's an all
encompassing topic. When you think about it.
Speaker 3: It's like thirty one Flavors and they don't care as
long as you eat their ice cream.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, and it's all made by them, so I
mean you've really had no option to you.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And I also thought about this, it's like the
greatest fear that these elites have, in my opinion, is
that we lose faith in the system. So they don't
care who you put your faith in, whether it's a
Democrat or Republican, a Zionists and anti Zionists, it doesn't matter.
They only care that you listen to somebody who says
the solution is the system. We just need to vote harder,
we need to do this, we need to change the system.
But it's still the system that's going to save you.
And that's ultimately what they're trying to push right.
Speaker 2: And so I remember Ryan Gable shout out Ryan gableman
because he talked about the Crusader tattoos that Pete Hegseth
has A long time ago, like over a year ago.
He talked about this, and Ryan Gables always like ahead
of the time with shit. He's like good at like
reading the writings on the wall, kind of like we're
doing now. And he pointed out, you know, a long
time ago that like the Holy War t shirts Alex Jones,
and then this Pete hag Seth with the Crusader tattoos,
we're heading towards a holy war is some kind of
religious you know war against Islam and Christians, et cetera.
That's exactly what we're seeing over and over. Let me
see if I can find.
Speaker 1: Is this his his high tea testof's grown video that
he made.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'll play this while I find his crusader tattoos,
like at Pete Hag has said here, I'll play this, all.
Speaker 1: Right, good for you. Uh so here I'll pull up.
I found it.
Speaker 2: So we got the Crusader crosses tattoo. Here, I'll pull
up because yeah, man, like you can see where this
is going. And what's his name, dude, Pete Hagg Seth
Seth right? And so if I was look at the
etymology of the word like heg in Greek, I wonder
what that word means. You know, it's Hegel, German philosopher,
German ideala.
Speaker 1: Oh dude, what are the odds? What are the odds that.
Speaker 2: Wow, Germanic Enlightenment figure named Hegel and he's got you
know what I'm saying when you have this kind of
weird Nazi anyway, I make a lot of weird connections
with names.
Speaker 1: Well, I think that there's a lot to the names.
Speaker 3: Well, one thing about like say peek Hegasus or Caroline
Levanz understand that the people at the front, like Pete Hegasith,
he is just a puppet, right, he is a character
in the script. The real power are like the deputies
behind them, and they're all connected to the.
Speaker 1: Poll and Teer mafia. That's the real power.
Speaker 3: They don't care who they you know, parade in front
of everybody to perform their word magic on people and
galvanize them to go with certain groups and certain agendas.
These guys are just you know, talking heads. The real
power is the names that you don't pay attention to.
And they're all connected to Volunteer, you know, the Ziocartel,
all that kind of stuff.
Speaker 2: That's right, and so you know, all this stuff again,
as you're saying, is connected, I'm actually going to start
making connections here. So let's look at also Steve Bannon, Right,
Steve Bannon talked about at the TPUSA conference that this
is a crusade, a jihad, a holy war against the
deep state. Yeah, it's exactly what we hear Alex Jones
trying to say. But the thing is they're working with
the deep state. It's the Bolshemk Revolution all over again. Guys,
That's what we're looking at.
Speaker 3: Right, Well, think about Steve Bannon at the same event
he exposed the Greater Israel Project. But then you read
the Epstein docs and you find out that he's connected
to Epstein. So it's like, why is someone connected to
Epstein who has an email correspondence with him then exposing
the Greater Israel Project unless they want you to know.
Once again, they want us to know all this stuff.
We think, oh, we're so, we're such good noticers and
and this applies to.
Speaker 1: Me as well. We notice what they want us to
notice for the most part.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, for sure, And it just shows that the
I wonder if he is Opus Day Tracy. I wouldn't
be surprised because Pete Peter Teel is Opus Day connected
his mentor was the Opus Day Priest.
Speaker 1: Well, I wouldn't.
Speaker 2: I wouldn't be surprised. But Pete Steve Bannon's really into
like the Collie Yuga and ship. Right, He's a mystic
Christian type, So.
Speaker 3: Yeah, he's a I believe he's actually a Jesuit. There
was there was no there was an article. Uh, and
you could type this up at just type in Steve Bannon.
Thanks either Sant Ignatius of Oil or the Jesuits for
his sobriety. And that's like the title of the article
where he gets thanks to the Jesuits for his sobriety.
Speaker 2: Oh my god, you're right, and he tells it to
Tucker and these guys again we're getting back into this
traditionalist movement characters that the false dialectic of this is
the Zionist on one side, who are instituting they aren't
even instituting all the technology, but there's like heads of
it that happen to be Zionists who are the heads
of the technology. And then you have the other side,
which of these guys and they're part of the same movement.
So here, let's pull that up, because holy shit, man, Tucker,
who's right there, Tucker who does shows with Alexander Dugan
and Steve Bannon.
Speaker 1: I still think that.
Speaker 3: I think that when he went to go meet with
Dugan over in Russia, he was still wearing his Kabala bracelet,
and I think Dugan was like, listen, dude, they're not
going to believe you're really a Christian if you keep
wearing that Kabala bracelet.
Speaker 1: Please take it off for the sake of the op Wow.
Speaker 2: So when we're talking about the Illuminati Opus Day Priest,
I wouldn't be surprised if they had some kind of
connection with the Jesuits. It is in the same kind
of field Steve Bannon tell's Tucker he will pray spiritual
exercises of Saint Ignatius of Liola if he goes to jail.
Speaker 1: There you go, Jesuit. Yeah.
Speaker 2: He says that if we don't win this, this country
is going to devolve into some kind of Neo Marxist
totalitarian regime. It's heading that way regardless. Now that we
know that Trump is actually on the side of the
deep state, we know that his forecasting is probably exactly
what they're trying to bring in, Right, So he's actually
telling you what they're trying to bring in. When you
look at it under that light, you understand he's actually
telling you what they're doing. Yeah, which is I always
invert things in that way because that's how you get.
Speaker 1: To do the truth.
Speaker 3: I feel like, yeah, I'm still blown away when you
brought that up about Alexander Dugan and his article in
nineteen ninety six called The Gnostic where he argues for
the left hand Path, which is considered dark, dark magic
and Western esoteric beliefs. Right, So here you have this
guy Maceratian as a Christian orthodoxy, but his true beliefs,
he believes in magic, and he's arguing for dark magic.
And this is Putin's brain, and make no mistake about it.
Just like he's Putin's brain. Steve O'Bannon was the brain
of Trump especially, that's what got him elected the first time.
That he's the one that tricked all of us and
Trump was some type of populace.
Speaker 1: That's exactly right, dude.
Speaker 2: And it's like he yes, it's a symbiotic relationship between
the two to mirror what he was doing in Russia.
Speaker 1: That's exactly right. And something interesting about that.
Speaker 2: We should actually look at that because where does the
at the core of magic principles all these things. Narcissism,
It comes from the Kabbalah, it comes from Babylonian you know,
this first Babylonian religion, which is Luciferianism. Right, Essentially, man
becomes God through enlightenment, through nosis.
Speaker 1: And so when he acts like.
Speaker 2: He's against the Israeli regime which has the Solomon Seal
is their flag, which is a magical emblem.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Bill Cooper lays out something very interesting that they didn't
have the Book of the Law when Solomon was actually ruling.
So what was he worshiping? What was his temple for?
Because Josiah later they found it. Whenever Malachi and Josiah
they found in Chronicles two twenty four. I think you
can find this that they actually found the Book of
the Law later. So this is after So what was
his temple to, what was he worshiping? What is the
Nochian magic?
Speaker 1: Right? What is this?
Speaker 2: And so this gets into this idea that it all
comes from the same place. And so when people act
like they're against the Israeli Zionist regime, but they're also gnostic, you're.
Speaker 1: Looking at somebody.
Speaker 2: You're looking at the Kabbolatry, you're looking at the two
pillars in freemasonry, You're right, you're looking at the white
and black on the checkerboard.
Speaker 1: It's the same thing.
Speaker 3: Well, I believe, and I could be wrong about this,
but I believe that he was ordered by I want
to say God. That could have been somebody else to
order that temple for God. But the one thing we
do know about Solomon is that he took seven hundred wives,
and he took seven hundred wives from the neighbors, these
neighboring tribes who were all pagans, right, And what God
got mad about was that he started bringing in the
practices of these wives and he became an idolator.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: So there's no doubt that in the process of making
this thing and afterwards that he was messing around with
dark magic. And then you also have that apographer texts
and I don't know how legitimate it is about King Solomon,
and they said that he used a magic schedule to
control demons to build part of the temple.
Speaker 1: Now, I don't know if that's.
Speaker 2: The Kabbala teachings, which is from the Kabbala, and a
lot of Christians like to point to that, but this
is in the Missionic Bible or the Massonic Bible or
whatever you would call it, which is the Jewish Bible, right,
So that is where they have Solomon's story, and they
do keep that in there. So my point is like
who originally told the story? Also, how do we know
what God it is? You know, that's been turned into
just a blanket statement for Lord, and Lord means bail
And so then you get into bail warship there. So
it's a very odd thing when you start to look
at like the Bible in its current iteration today because
of the translations, right, that's the whole idea of the
sons of God. Well, if you read the Bible and
like the regular English Standard version, it doesn't say that.
It doesn't say the sons of God came down and
made it with man or Man's daughters, right, So there's
discrepancies to be made. And that's why I kind of
lean on what Bill Cooper says, which is like, I
just look at what Jesus Christ says because everything else
has been kind of muddied and messed with the times
of Babylon, you know what I mean. But there's an
aspect to that where I'm like, I kind of agree
with that only because of the who the fuck am
I to know all the historical changing and translations of
the Bible? Right, I know, this guy died and lived
for me, and his words have been said in multiple books,
so you can cross reference them.
Speaker 1: I mean, I agree with that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean to a certain extent. But you also
got to understand, if you believe in the New Testament,
you gotta believe in the Old Testament because Jesus was.
Speaker 1: I believe in it. I believe in it. I just
think that they fucked with it.
Speaker 3: It was a fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy, right if
you read Isaiah fifty three and various other ones pointing
to the Messiah, the majority and people are realized like this,
if like seventy five or eighty percent of everything that
Jesus taught was from the Old Testament. Now he gave
the correct explanation of it of where the Israelites went wrong.
But to me, there's no and I think one thing
they're going to try to do in the end times,
if we're leading up to this, whether it's real or manufactured,
they're going to try to divide the New Testament from
the Old Testament, and they're going to usher in this narcissism,
and they're going to point to the God of the
Old Testament is really the Demiurge, which they would consider
a Satan type.
Speaker 1: Figure, as a way to see that.
Speaker 3: Totally, I believe that's what will happen, because that's Christianism
right there.
Speaker 2: I also think, though, Ben, we know that people like
to put truth within the lies, So how much of
that is true?
Speaker 1: Though?
Speaker 2: How much of it is true is my only question.
How much of the Old Testament has been fucked with,
is all I'm saying. Yes, there's prophesies of Jesus's coming, right,
that's the whole point of the Old Testament is to
show that it's been known and it's been written that
this will happen. However, there is some truth to the
aspect of there has been muddying of the waters of
God Lord, God Lord and all those things.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: So, oh, I'm not one of the I'm not one
of those guys that think the current version of the
Bible that we have is perfect.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 3: There's some people like King James only, King James only,
it's perfect word of God, and then you read into
it and it's like, no, it's not. They make up
words that shouldn't be there. You know, translations might be different,
and this is one thing people should actually do and
go back to the Greek, go back to the Hebrew,
see what those words mean, and then compare that to
the English translations that we have, and you can kind
of see there is some artistic liberty when creating these translations.
Speaker 2: Yeah, like a concordance, right, I have a concord I
look at the concordance all the time, and that proves
that the sons of God were in the Bible.
Speaker 1: But it has been written different in different Bibles.
Speaker 2: So if you have a concordance, you can kind of
get to some of these answers a little easier. Which
is why I understand that there are discrepancies that I
have found that make me wonder what if I not
found that, you know that, you know, maybe lead to
some beliefs being held right, so and other people too
for that matter, you know, And also we.
Speaker 3: Got to take in consideration. You know, who was in
charge of putting together the official canon at the Roman Empire,
and before that he was worshiping the god of Apollo.
He thought he was a direct descendant of the Apollo.
So am I to believe, especially when you see how
the religion changed after they legalized it in Rome, when
they started bringing in what I would call idolatry, the
venerating of the saints. They say they're not worshiping them,
but go look at a shrine to marry and tell
me that's not worship. The changing of the Sabbath all
that type of stuff. So now I don't necessarily trust
anything that comes It was.
Speaker 2: A political I think it was a political move that
stole all the real spiritualism out of it, and it
instituted pagan spiritualism into it. And so you know, there's
a weird thing where you can't get to the true
quote unquote Christian mystic religion that is within it because
it's been muddied with pagan you know, religion all over it.
So it's hard to actually get to it without actually
falling into the Gnostic Luciferian doctrine. And that's been done
on purpose, because I do think there's an aspect of
some sort of like mystical traditions maybe that Jesus kind
of like tried to show and practice or whatever that
you just can't even get to and understand because it's
not anywhere there. Besides, what leads you into Luciferian is
you know what I mean. I think there's an aspect
of that, but what do I know.
Speaker 1: Well, that's that's why I like, I mean, I love
the Bible.
Speaker 3: I run a Bible study, but at the end of
the day, I just like to keep it simple, right,
it's well they go.
Speaker 1: You know.
Speaker 3: One of my favorite pastors read the popular pastorgo you know, Rabbi,
Rabbi or teacher, teacher, one of the most important commandments right,
and he says, love the Lord God with all your heart,
and love your neighbor like you love yourself. While prophets
and commandments hang on these two truths essentially right. So
at the end of the day, if you love God right,
and you're pent of your ways and actually try to
live a spirit filled life, and you love your neighbor
like you love yourself, I think everything will work out
for you in the end.
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 2: And look at what they've driven us towards. We're scared
of our neighbors, we don't love each other, and we
hate God. So we are here.
Speaker 1: We are so the.
Speaker 2: Time has come to reveal the truth, to expose the
spiritual essence of what boot licking ordinary people call political extremism.
We have confused them with enough enough by changing the
labels of our political sympathies, the color of our heroes,
and by passing from fire to cold, from rightism to
leftism and back again. All of this has been but
an intellectual artillery Barrage a kind of ideological warm up.
Speaker 1: Huh. It's almost like he's saying.
Speaker 2: That this has been a false dialectic that's been pushed
onto people. That way, it could lead into this new
what he's about to lay out.
Speaker 1: Doesn't it seem that way? Oh?
Speaker 2: Absolutely, Yeah, we have frightened, attempted the extreme right and left,
and now both and others have lost their way.
Speaker 1: Is straight from the beaten tracks. This is amazing. Ah.
Speaker 2: So we've gotten to the truth. That is exactly what
he's saying. This is amazing. As the Great Jesus av
Gidney Golovin like to repeat, he goes against the day,
should not fear the night. There's nothing more pleasant than
when the ground is slipping out from under your feet.
This is where the first experience of flight. It kills
vermin and tempers angels.
Speaker 1: Ah.
Speaker 2: So it's really this idea of like accelerationism that's being
laid out here.
Speaker 3: Do you notice what he called us normal people? This
is all they really good? He called us boot liquors, Yeah, boot.
Speaker 2: Lickers, the lower yeah, the underlings, Yeah, who were we really?
Who's menacing face is at all the more clearly peering
out from the paradoxical radical political movement with the terrifying
name National Bolshevism, which is, by the way, something he
started today. We can respond without any ambiguity in vagueness,
but this necessitates a brief excursion into the history of
the spirit. Mankind has always had two types of spirituality
to pass, the right hand and left hand. The first
is characterized by a positive attitude towards the surrounding world, harmony,
balance and bliss. All evils but a particular instance, a
local deviation from the norm, and so he gets into
The right hand path is also called the milky way.
It does not subject man to the particular suffering. It
protects from radical experiences. This is a false path, he says.
It leads to slumber. It leads to nowhere. The second
path is the left hand path, sees everything in the reverse.
There is no milky bliss, but black suffering, no silent calm,
but festering, fiery drama of split being. This is the
path of wine. It is destructive, terrifying, wrath and rage
rain in it. And in this path all reality is
perceived as hell and as a submersion into the heart
of some kind of unthinkable catastrophe originating from the very
heights of the cosmos.
Speaker 1: Wow, this guy's insane. He sounds like Alistair.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, and this is what once again, he is
an occultist. He is arguing for dark magic. So if
our thoughts are aligning with what he says, it's time
to take a step back and go Wait a minute,
Am I falling for this trap? Am I falling for
an agenda? Why am I? Why am I beliefs aligning
with this occultist? And you could say the same thing
for the zionis regime rights, which is why I just say,
reject it all and fall Jesus.
Speaker 2: Yeah, only this path is correct. He who takes the
path will gain fame and immortality. He who survives it
will prevail and receive an award that is greater than being.
He who goes down the left hand path knows that
it will end. The dungeon of matter will collapse and
be transformed into a heavenly city. A chain of initiates
passionately prepares. And now this is like when they talk
about like I don't fear death. I know that I'm
gonna live forever. And you know what matters is everlasting life.
None of this stuff in a way kind of leads
into this where it's like almost nihilistic in a spiritual sense.
It sounds like Alice Bailey where she goes, Hey, I
know a lot of people are gonna die when we
usher in this new age, but it's okay because they're
gonna live forever. Their soul lives on. It's all good, guys.
If anything, they're gonna ascend in their death, by the way,
so really they're going to be better.
Speaker 1: Off when I would say they would descend down to hell.
Speaker 2: Right, And so it's interesting that, you know, it seems
to be mirroring this ideology everywhere you look when you
look deeper.
Speaker 3: At it, right, Yeah, what I just love how he
started it. You guys are all a bunch of bootlookers.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, screw you love us? Well, here he lays
it out. The left hand path is called nosis knowledge.
So this is why, uh, you know, Michael like Kino
worships Set, because Set would be the left hand path.
Right Ossirian mysteries would be the right hand path, both
of them being a dialectical engine leading you towards Luciferianism. However,
they like to act like ones better than the other,
you know, but.
Speaker 3: I think they play off with each other, don't you think. Yeah,
so like this white lodge or this dark lodge. Once again,
they're different paths, but it leads to the same destination.
Speaker 2: Right, No, absolutely, Uh yeah. Gnosticism, you know, the big
G and freemasonry. What do you think it means? Doesn't
mean God, it means noss oh does Yeah, yes, dude,
that's the G man and a lot of people don't
know that, you know. BUTSS is ultimately what they worship
because it is self enlightenment, self fulfillment. It is the
Luciferian principles, That's what it is. And so that's ultimately
what they worship. Why they worship the sun because it
being the illuminating light of the world that gives life
to all and they achieve their noses through it.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And I guess, as someone who follows Jesus, I think
the reason why they pushed noses so much is because
guess what doesn't lead to salvation in my opinion, right,
So if you're focused on all the knowledge which they're pushing,
then hey, good for their side, right. So I think ultimately,
you know, people talk about this is you know, these
are spiritual battles that we're facing, right, they're trying to
jack our loose or something like that. But I remind
people that these spiritual battles are just manifestations of a
greater war that's going on. And I think that that
is a battle between God Most High, Jesus, the loyal Angels,
the falling Satan, and the fallen angels. And they're battling
all of our salvation. And you know, the question is
do you choose knowledge their religion nosis or do you
choose to humble yourself and recognize. In my opinion, you
know at least that Jesus Christ died for our sins
and we are given that gift of eternal life.
Speaker 1: Well, that's right, and they sell you they.
Speaker 3: Oppose each other, in my opinion, Noss and salvation oppose
each other. And in this greater war, let's the other.
It wants less people to achieve salvation, so they push
what won't guarantee that.
Speaker 2: I could totally see that, dude, No, that's right, And yeah,
I think that. You know, whenever you look deeper into
like freemasonry, you know, Mystery Babylon series, I started that
revamp revisit of Bill Cooper's legendary series. And I'm just
gaining you know, I've watched this and read this series
maybe three or four or five six times already, and
this time is really crazy different a little bit because
I feel like I've gained so much contextual understanding and
knowledge of like this thing that we study, and going
back through his like back to the basics rendering of
what it is, it's like, Wow, it really all opens
up to you in a crazy way, you know.
Speaker 1: And I would even recommend that you.
Speaker 2: Check out at least this one episode, the first intro one.
Speaker 1: I'll send it to you, so you did.
Speaker 2: I will send it to you because what he lays
it out, and it's so crazy because by the end,
let me let me show you what he says at
the end here, because it's probably the craziest thing I've
ever read. And as you get through the series, it'll
make more sense. But it's insane. And this is kind
of where I'm leading some of my thought process from
a little bit, because I'm like, dude, there's something to that.
Let me pull this up real quick. It's a little
bit of a topic changer, but not really real quick.
Speaker 3: Yeah, they're talking about Adam and Eve, and I just
want to say this, it's you know, people like to
blame a lot of people for things. Oh it's the Jews. Oh,
it's the Jesuits. Oh, it's you know, hubbad or whatever
you know. And my whole thing is I think we
don't blame Adam and Eve enough because if they never
ate that damn apple, we would not be in this
position today.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: No.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, that's where I put all I play. Yeah, let's
see if I can find where this is. Where's it at?
Soh No, I thought it was this one, It should
be this one. Ah, here it is.
Speaker 2: Here it is with the explorations and Sudan regions of
Africa of the ruins of the ancient capital of Ethiopia,
which is Kush, I was making sure I was sharing this,
which is Cush of the Old Testament, bringing to light
an ancient temple of Ammone containing a huge Masonic altar.
And with archaeologists getting ready to renew their work in
Palestine and Euphrates Valley, antiquarians expect further additions to the
vast amounts of evidence of the worldwide spread of primitive freemasonry,
which concealed in its rights, symbols and ceremonies for teaching
the belief of the Grand architect and Grand Geometrician of
the universe, a one in supreme God who creates nothing.
As said before, not the God of the Bible. This
God is a pantheistic god, and we can expect the
explorations though, eventually to bring new material that links the
bound I'm sorry, the mound builders of the Mississippi Valley,
the Mayas of the Yucatan, and the ancient Egypts into
one distinctly primitive brotherhood.
Speaker 1: This is this. We talk about this all the time,
don't we.
Speaker 2: This is Atlantis, right, Yeah, that they're trying to push
and if you follow the thread you will find it
leads up to the present day. They believe Freemasonry is
the parents of all religions, the original world.
Speaker 1: Good No, sorry, well real quick, you know, do you
know who Cush is?
Speaker 3: Right? So if you read the Old Testament, you have
all these different descendants.
Speaker 1: Of Noah son of Cain, isn't he?
Speaker 3: Yeah? But one line, which is the dividic line, leads
to Jesus. And in the Old Testament, all these different
people of Cush, this and that they spread all over
the Middle Eastern area, and that's when these mystery religions,
this fallen angel worship kind of entered all these different
culture It all goes back to that and these specific
blood lines.
Speaker 2: Well you're gonna see yep, I'm gonna pull that up
in a second, because he talks about that.
Speaker 1: That's so amazing. You just brought that up.
Speaker 2: Hold on to that Davidic blood line, everybody.
Speaker 1: Hold on to that. That's the Jesus. Yeah, yes, hold.
Speaker 2: On to that because it's exactly what we talked about
in here, and it's so important that we talk about that.
The original worldwide cosmic gnosis diffuses in ancient times into
the utter most ends of the earth, scattered as it were,
the Pompeii of prehistoric science. So in other words, this
is Atlantis, but the mystery religion spread everywhere, this gnosis, right, Okay,
it is prehistoric science, but not based in reality. However,
this yeah, Bill Cooper says that all the Masonic rituals
were supremely scientific in an ancient way survival through long ages. Okay,
let me get past this. I'm trying to find he
talks about damn it. Oh, here it is.
Speaker 1: This is it? Okay? So he was talking about it, Sorry, guys.
Speaker 2: He was talking about the druids worship the deity the bull,
right ball, Bacchus, same thing as did the early Hebrew
in Egyptians under the form of an erect monolith of Phallis,
the hermetic pillar of Gilgall like Gilgamesh, in which all well,
I don't know actually Gilgall, but they were all found
in Palestine today. That's the important part I'm trying to
get to here. And the Syrijwin, the female concert of
who responds in every way to the Egyptian Isis, had
a solar god called Esus or Jesus. And so what
he's saying is that they've mixed in this pagan like
Jesus's name comes from, like Esus, from this Egyptian consort
of Isis. And so that's kind of what I'm trying
to explain here, is that there's been a lot of
that type of fuckery that's gone on in the Bible too,
where I'm like, you know what I mean, that's where
I get kind of weird with it. That's what I
was just trying to explain earlier, because of this kind
of context I'm getting here where it's like, ah, you
can see it.
Speaker 1: It is everywhere.
Speaker 3: Well, it permeates well, I mean in the Old Testament
it talks about the infiltration of these pagan beliefs within
the body of Israel. I mean the entire kind of
Old Testament. It's like the same story reoccurring. It's they're
faithful to God Knows High, then they kind of rebel
and they take on the gods of their neighbors and
stuff like that. Then they go back and they're faithful
to God Knows High, and then they go and take
the you know, on the gods of their neighbors. So
you could see how these pagan belief systems could definitely
have infiltrated the Israelites for sure.
Speaker 2: Right, So, let me find the Dave Davidic bloodline aspect
of this you just brought up. You got anything else
right now, because I'm trying to find it.
Speaker 3: Oh up here, just that the Dividic blood line is
the blood line that led to Jesus and all the
other blood all the other because if you read the
Table of Nations, I think there's something like seventy of
them or something like that. After Deuteronomy thirty two. I
think that all the rulers of these nations are all
from the Noah bloodline that do not lead to Jesus.
Speaker 1: That's right, yep.
Speaker 2: And he kind of lays that out here, and that's
the point of them going to Palestine and trying to
unearth everything to try to prove their whatever. That's kind
of what he was trying to make a case for.
He says that all in New Sits, when they begin
their mystical journey, only begins when they're lifted by the
grip of the Lion's Paul. The lions Paul, of course,
representing the royal family of the tribe of Judah, which
comes from the House of David, meant to rule the
New World Order from from Israel. Essentially to make a
modern connection here, of course, we had Netyahu. Did you
know Rising Lion, right Operation Rising Lion whenever he went
I ran recently, and you know Bill Cooper talks about
how Israel was created to bring about Armageddon and the
ushes in this new World Order, and he just said,
here it gets ran by this Davidic blood line tribe
of Judah, which is the Lion.
Speaker 1: Well, I would say that's a counterfeit Davidic blood line. Right.
Speaker 3: So it's like they're wolves in sheep's clothing and they
say the things that would not present them as these wolves.
Speaker 2: It's like the roth Child's right, it's British Israelism, right, yeah, said, yeah,
that's what he kind of says is the enemy. That
was the point of all that is He's saying British Israelism.
Speaker 1: That's what all this is about.
Speaker 2: Right, that's the issue here, which again is the world
Babylonian banker families, the ros Childs, et cetera.
Speaker 3: So, yeah, exactly, black nobility and all that kind of stuff,
and they hide behind all these institutions and in reality
they're all saint worshipers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right, dude, seriously. No.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And because it goes all the way back to
that first religion that Freemasons say that they, you know,
this cosmic religion that he kind of lays out mystery
Babylon And it's the only religion besides like Christianity.
Speaker 1: It is the only one.
Speaker 2: Otherwise there's not like a bunch of religions that we
think are like all these different things like Hinduism, Paganism
and all these different things. They're all the same, with
different aspects to them and some slightly different teachings, but
ultimately the same thing self deification.
Speaker 3: Well, and it's all the same gods, just given a
different name. It's just a different flavor. It's the reason
why all the nations except for one back in the day,
they all worship the pantheon the gods, and I believe
they were the same gods, they just worshiped them differently.
It's like if you read the Book of Revelations and
somewhere halfway through the last seven years, I believe around halfway,
these fallen angels are given the keys to the abyss
right and they release back on to the earth to
torment humanity for five months, and the leader. According to
the Bible, it says Abadon the destroyer in Hebrew, or
a Polyon the destroyer in Greek, or Azel or Shiva
the destroyer in Hinduism. There are all these destroyer archetypes, right,
you didn't did it now? So I think it's the
same fallen gods that they worshiped. It's just a different
name pertaining to a different culture.
Speaker 2: It's the horned God in the Horned God, like sir
Nuns Cern. And guess what's outside of Cern the Shiva statute. Yeah,
Sirnu knows is a deity, a Celtic god whose name
is clearly attested once talks about Sir Nunos. Is this
ram horned serpent symbolism of fertility, wild beasts?
Speaker 1: I mean, it's same, same symbolism. So again, this.
Speaker 2: One world religion is rearing its head over and over
and the more I look into this mystery Babylon, the
more I can see it everywhere. Uh, Sir Nuno's Shiva.
It's all the same creator destroyer deity. That comes down
to what we're speaking of. It's one thing. It's one thing.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and you can see how that can make an
extreme comeback if they manufacture this holy war Jews and
Christians versus Muslims, right, and they blame it on these people,
and then you could definitely see a comeback of these gods,
especially if they somehow come back as sended masters or
something like that.
Speaker 2: Well, that's right, and that's that's that's kind of the
whole point of this is to as they're doing this,
also bring in this new world religion. Isn't it interesting
that they chose four alien species when they came out,
talked about it on Fox News for like the four
main Yeah, the Nordics, the Reptilians, the insects or whatever. Yeah,
and what are the four major major you know, houses
or whatever. Like you know, you got the Lion, the eagle,
the man in the bull, right, that's the four What
am I thinking of here?
Speaker 1: That the four like it's outside you it's the four
like main carb faces kind of but it's not really
called that. What is it? What am I thinking of here? Guys?
Speaker 2: Somebody in the chat knows, but it you know, it's
the classic picture where it's yeah, it is the cherub them,
but it's like it represents the four major something that
it could be the major It could.
Speaker 3: Be the four empires that are going to rule over
the earth. And that's in Daniel. I believe that's also
in Danga multiple ways when he has visions and also
with Nebekzer and that statue that talks about the four
empires that could be the four guys.
Speaker 1: Gospels it's the four Gospels.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so the Four Gospels fall into this as well.
And this is another way that they've kind of mixed
in paganism into it. Is what Bill Cooper was kind
of arguing with the numerology of four, not the gospels themselves,
but the numerology of it. And just like you you know,
the seven everywhere and the twelve everywhere. You know, And
in my father's house, which means heavenly abode, if you
go look at the original etymology of house, there are
a lot of mansions, and if you go look up
the etymology of mansions, it means house.
Speaker 1: So in my.
Speaker 2: Father's heavenly abode, there are a lot of houses referring
to the zodiacal houses.
Speaker 1: And what the fuck is that, dude, because that's in
the Bible, you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: So like when you know that, that's why I question things,
because like what do you do with that?
Speaker 1: Because that's clearly pagan, you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: And so there's an aspect to that where like you've
got to beware and user discernment. That's what I'm trying
to point out here, And you have to understand there
are ways of numerology, et cetera, because it's one system
that they have to work in.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and one thing I also find interesting, especially now,
and let's just throw in science and this alien thing
the way they use secular ideas to discuss or i think,
prove biblical truths. And I'll give you two examples of that,
talking about the four types of aliens. Well, one of
the types of aliens is a reptilian what do you know,
one of the bene eloheam that came down here. One
type is called the seraphim, which literally translates to either
fiery dragon or serpent. So it's a secular way of
describing these serpent like angels. And then I also like
to point out this idea that's gained a lot of steams,
especially with modern science, and I say modern over the
past ten years. It's tied to quantum physics stuff like that,
when it comes to this idea of a simulation theory. Right,
so now, if it's a simulation like these theoretical science type,
like the point to what does that mean? That means
the simulation had to have a creator. Genesis tell us
about the universe is that there's a creator. So right
now we're seeing secular explanations of things you find in
the ancient pass and in this case the Bible.
Speaker 2: Well, and two things here, iron lunatic. I'll get to
the seven in a second, because seven is another one too.
It's it's about the numerology of it. There's more than
one aspect to it. So like when you look at
now the Hebrew four letter word name for that's righthv h.
And so what he was kind of expressing is that's
the god of nature, right, and so when they represent
with four like that, it kind of And also he
was talking about how like when you look geometria, we
don't really do geomatria, but if you were to, you
would notice that a lot of these gods equate to
the geometria of Jehovah, which is like something that they
do with these names like Bacchus and you know, Baal
and all these things, right, And so that's something important,
is the numerology that they work in, and how they've
infiltrated the Bible with it in ways that you can't
really know, like infiltrated the teachings in this way, not
to say that you know, it's not real, but they
this is the problem with having like the pagan you
know Constantine, who did a political movement by turning Christianity
into you know, the religion of the Roman Empire at
the time, but it was infiltrated by pagans.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And I'm of the belief though, because you do
see when people talk about this up from certain lenses
and perspectives, you see this these overlaps, right, So the
question is is was it infiltrated in the Bible or
did all these pagan religions they just try to counterfeit
the real God.
Speaker 1: They tried to counterfeit the real truth.
Speaker 3: And remember there was you know, Yahweh was present on
this earth before the Law of Moses, right Adami ever,
there there was knowledge of these people of God. So
I'm of the belief personally that these similarities amongst the
pagan belief system and what's within the Bible is these
fallen angels trying to counterfeit the truth and incorporate it
into theirs.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's my own belief.
Speaker 3: But right, once again, you know, with what was going
on back in the day, could have infiltrated some parts
of the Bible.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna say it couldn't, but yeah.
Speaker 2: Well, I think numerologically, if we're going off of that,
and we know Freemason's work in this way through the Cabbala,
that's where I'm coming from. I'm not saying anything about
the teachings themselves or what it means or any of that.
I'm more speaking to the see like right here, four seasons.
Why do we have four seasons for the four gospels?
Four alien species? And it talks about the Last Supper.
There's twelve houses, four groups of three in the Last Supper, right,
So four groups of three is how they separated that.
And so you have the seven for the Stars of
the Ple Eightes, the seven Stars of the Ple Eightes
or the seven seals opened by the Lion tribe of Judah,
hence showing the emphasis of the tribal juty leading is
into the new world order as far as revelation goes,
because that is what opens up the tribulations and everything
right and the four horsemens of the Apocalypse, et cetera.
So it's interesting to me that the seven Seals might
be related to this seven Pleiadian star sisters that we
see in the New Age movement rearing its head with
the alien stuff and then again with the four species
of aliens. So I'm only speaking to the numerological kind
of parallels that we see here as we look at
these narratives being built. Yeah, and to tie into that
world religion thing is what I was going to say.
It gets to that. That's what it leads to, is
this one world emergence of religions. Because you already have
the numerology inside of the Bible. It's already been infiltrated
into there.
Speaker 3: There's definitely numerology within the Bible. And just for seven
you know, Steven brings us up all the time, the
Seven Mountain Mandate right right now. The evangelical movement, which
is kind of controlling Trump right now, that's exactly semi
controlling Trump right now. There's different factions to all that.
Speaker 2: In the age, you know, we're heading into a new age.
You know, it talks about ages or eons in the Bible,
and that's kind of what we're working on.
Speaker 1: When when we.
Speaker 2: Listen to people like Alice Bailey talk about this new
age coming, you know, it's a new eon. It's the
end of the When they say it's like the end
of the world in the apocalypse or armageddon, they're speaking
of end of this world, this.
Speaker 1: Eon in the beginning of a new one.
Speaker 2: And you know that gets back into this theosophy aspect
of things.
Speaker 1: Interesting, dude, it's all coming, that's for sure.
Speaker 3: It's about to get absolutely wild because I think at
this point, when you, like I said, when you know
the endgame and you see how far along in the
agenda they are, I think it's too late to pull back.
Like I think they're going for it, and they're gonna
run it into the wills fall off and we'll see
if it happens. And I'm also at the belief too.
You know, you might come black pilled for this, but
you know, I took it with the glass of the
Holy Spirit, so I have complete faith in you know,
God and Jesus. But I think if humans ever become
too much of a problem right for their agenda, then
that's when they'll really just kill us.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: I think they all built out these underground bunkers. I
think I read an article somewhere that in Switzerland they
have enough underground bunkers for the entire population. We know
the role that the Swiss play within the global banking system,
that's right, you know, it's like they're getting ready for this.
They've been getting ready to this for a long time.
I think if we ever really pose any threat to it,
they would just demolish it all and start over, and.
Speaker 1: It would look artificial. But hey, they're not going to
give up their power. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And as we talk about this, right, you've got you
know Alex Jones posting the new energy World Orders started
Iranian missiles invade US defenses.
Speaker 1: I support a global nuclear war, he said that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, here it is exclusive why I now support a
global nuclear war? As we're talking about this, I had
to play it yesterday.
Speaker 8: On my regular weekday broadcast from one am to three pm.
The middle of the show, I came out and said
that I now support total nuclear war, complete worldwide thermal
nuclear arm again, and it will kill all live on
the surface of the planet, and that will just leave
a few survivors in underground bunkers so that the elite
that no best can re emerge from those.
Speaker 1: And Bill, oh, is he being sarcastic? He's being sarcastic.
Speaker 3: That's hilarious though, No, he can be funny sometimes funny man, he.
Speaker 1: Is, Dude. I don't hate him. I don't hate anybody.
Speaker 2: Wish I hate any of these people, right, Yeah, I
don't hate I have no hate my heart. I just
enjoy ripping on their fucking narratives, dude, because it's just like,
I see where you're going with this. And you know,
when you study narrative building and the fat mind wars right,
the whole thing, that the whole thing on with Michael Aquino.
It's like, dude, I've been studying this like this. It's
hard for me to ignore when I see the building
of narratives and I you know, follow the logic down
to its you know, logical conclusion, and yeah, it's not good.
Speaker 3: And I think you say something very important, right, I
don't hate anybody, That's what you said, and that's key.
We should not hate anybody. And I think, you know,
the true test for all of us right in God's eyes.
You know, I had a friend reach out to me.
You know, it's easy to love your family. It's easy
to love a cousin and pray for them. But the
real test for all of us is if we can
pray for our enemies, right, Because at the end of
the day, for me personally, I don't want to see
anybody have to serve eternity in hell. And I think
everybody there's only one unforgivable sin, and that's blasphemies against
the Holy Spirit.
Speaker 1: Now what that is, that's up to debate.
Speaker 3: But the point of the matter is is like everybody else,
everybody has a redeemable arc, no matter who they are,
what ethnicity they are, what they've done in the past.
Speaker 1: I mean, just think about Saul DePaul.
Speaker 3: You know, Saul was going around going after the early
Jews and Christians that were following Jesus, turn them over
to the Roman authorities where they persecuted dead. But I
don't guess what happened. He had his road to Damascus moment,
he had that coming to Jesus moment. He then understood
that Jesus was Messiah. But guess what, God then was
able to use him as an instrument of righteousness. Right,
So I think we should all be used as an
instrument of righteousness to promote the truth without having hatred
in our hearts. Because the point I think the point
of all of this is and why do we speak
the truth to get other people to believe us?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 3: So, if you're operating with hatred in your heart towards anybody,
then it's not going to work.
Speaker 1: That's right, dude.
Speaker 2: And you know I have a weird take on like
pitying people. I don't pity people. I don't feel bad
for people, And by that I mean I have empathy
for people. But if I pity you, or if I
feel bad for you on a level of like, oh,
poor fucker, then I'm now placing myself in a superior
role over you.
Speaker 1: And I just feel like, look, we're all humans, dude.
Speaker 2: I could end up in the same position as that
person I'm pitying, pitting one day, and then the next
day I'm in the same position. So I feel like
humility comes from that too. Where you're not, you know, hateful.
You know, you don't pity people. You don't put yourself
in a supremist place, whether it be hating others because
you feel yourself morally superior, or you feel yourself you know,
financially superior, or whatever it might be. I just don't
give into those in their various forms, whether it be
like pity or hate or whatever, envy, you know, things
like that, And I feel like that all goes into
the same thing.
Speaker 1: I just have. You know, everybody's human, everybody. I love everybody.
That's it, you know, I got it. Yeah, whatever, Hey.
Speaker 3: And I think we're also at least for me, right
especially with someone who was an atheist and was not
living right and I was just I was a slave
to sin. You know, it's hard for me to judge
somebody else who's doing that knowing that I once.
Speaker 1: Did it before I saw the light. Right.
Speaker 3: So that's where the humility comes in, is that I
think that's ultimately what should unite us in a humble
fashion and is recognizing that we're all sinners to some extent, right.
Speaker 1: And I think in God's eyes, you know, this is
what he says.
Speaker 3: I know, granted there's various sins that are dealt with differently,
but you know, in God's eyes, he says, you know,
you break one law, you break them all, right. So
it's hard to understand that, but we all fall short, right,
And I think that we have to apply that same
grace to people who are deceived right now, as God.
Speaker 1: Showed us through all this stuff.
Speaker 3: Right, I think we have to operate out of that
at Gopy love that hey, you.
Speaker 1: Got to reach out.
Speaker 2: You need to reach out, you know, the same way
you'd reach out at somebody like a homeless guy on
the street that's like fucking struggling, you know'd be like, hey, man,
you know you need a drink, you need water, you
need a little dollar or two, you know, don't buy,
don't go buy and crack with it. Hey, do your thing.
If that's what you got to do. Man, I ain't
gonna hate you for it. But it's like reaching out
to these people, are extending a hand, kind of obliterating
their whole thing, their system, in their whole organization is
obviously another aspect to the goal, like we're doing with
Alex Jones and these things, but also like if I
would still reach my hand out and try to have
some empathy and logic with the person, you know what
I mean.
Speaker 1: So there's a duality to it that you can still
have means, Oh, absolutely, Well.
Speaker 3: The question is this, it's why are we trying to
blow up the narrative?
Speaker 1: Right?
Speaker 3: And for me, at least personally, it's not because I
expect that I'm going to see any real change in
the system of control. It might turn a little different
so we don't recognize it, but it's still the same system.
I think we should blow up the narrative to point
people to the truth, right, and that's that God loved
us and in my opinion, that Jesus died for our sins,
and that's how you get salvation. So point out the
fallacies of the world without hating these people and ultimately
lead to people to the truth.
Speaker 1: That's right, I agree, man, dude. Yeah, we're gonna get
out of here.
Speaker 2: I just I'm debating if I want to answer this
crazy fucking question that somebody just asked. Do you all
think if God as black, Heaven would be a ghetto?
Speaker 3: No?
Speaker 1: I think. I think.
Speaker 2: I think ghettos have been perpetuated by, you know, a
certain class of people, and that the current iteration of
Black Americans we see today have been manufactured on a
major scale into what they are today. Their culture has
been manufactured, their personalities to a large extent, have been manufactured.
A lot of their histories have been manufactured, and they
were dragged here. You have like a generational iniquity of
being dragged here and enslaved and then put into you know,
impoverished towns and.
Speaker 1: A lot of like crazy like do they have a chance.
Not really, But let's look at black people elsewhere, right, like,
you know, maybe not.
Speaker 2: I guess you can't look at Africa because all the
resources are there, so they're all getting fucked up.
Speaker 1: Over there.
Speaker 2: So it's like, I don't think it's like black people
that cause it. I think it's the people that control
everything that fucks all that up. People are people, Humans
are humans, and everybody has the equal aspects of virtue.
And I believe that, and I think it could be
fucked up through environment and things like that over time.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And I would like to clarify something I said
real quick.
Speaker 1: It's just based on the chat.
Speaker 3: I said that the one unforgivable sin according to the
Bible is blasphemy is against the Holy Spirit. Now, I
think that has open up for interpretation. I don't know
exactly what that means, do it. Does that mean if
I think that you said some bad things about Jesus
when you're an atheist, that you're automatically kept out of heaven.
Speaker 1: Absolutely not right.
Speaker 3: I personally think blasphemies that the Holy Spirit is messing
with God's creation and your God's creation and has something
to do with DNA altering to the point where you're
no longer human. But I don't think because you said
something bad about God when you were an atheist or
something like that, that you're kicked out of head.
Speaker 1: I don't believe that, Yeah, I could see that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, hey, if you hate God, you know, just
know that He still loves you.
Speaker 1: And remember that we were all enemies at God at
some point, right we are.
Speaker 2: I mean, dude, it's time and time again in the
whole Bible is about people hating Him in turn on
him and Him still loving them. So yeah, try to
try to exemplify some of that aspect you know, of
your own personality. But yeah, Ben, let them know where
they can find you. To another bank episode. I we
could go all night, dude.
Speaker 3: You can find me at End of the World News
on Instagram, Spotify, or iTunes. I make three minute videos
on Instagram. I've been doing a little less lately just
because it takes a lot of time and I work
a lot. Or you can find me at YouTube and
that's what I have on my marker right here, and
it's End of the World's add an s to world
News all one word, and I do a weekly or
sometimes twice a week podcast where we discuss well it's
two separate one so on Monday I do basically domestic
and geopolitics to a biblical worldview, and on Fridays, if
I don't have a guest. I like to get into
the influencer industrial complex. I know, I like to talk
about a lot, but ultimately I think they have the
tip of the spear of the magic trick that we're
all under. It's that word spells kind of like what
we talked today. So yeah, that's where you can find me.
Thanks for everybody in the chat that tuned in and
gave us all your examples and stuff like that. It
makes it a lot more fun. Thank you for having
me on here. It's always a pleasure to talk.
Speaker 1: Oh, anytime, dude, anytime.
Speaker 2: Yeah, dude, definitely the tip of the iceberg. That's why
we had to spend some time talking about it, because
that's that's where you know nowadays that you know, the
media is done. Everybody gets their information not from the
news but from online, and it's from majorly these talking heads.
So you got to analyze them for what they're putting
out there. You know, what kind of people, What are
people eating in their brain? You know, what are they
accepting in their minds? And we add that counterforce to it.
Shout out iron lunatic, dude, Thank you, good show. Right on, brother, everybody.
You got a large archive of early access episodes. We've
got a Mystery Babylon first episode of the series.
Speaker 1: Go check that out.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna be doing part two on Sunday, so get
yourself caught up for that Part two. I'll be live
like three or four times this weekend, so be on
the lookout. We'll be doing weekend Warrior shit all weekend.
Thank you guys, Thank you Jeezy brother. I appreciate you. Hey,
Hopefully I see you guys all weekend, man, and we'll
be back. Shout out Tara for another. Jewels them floating hard.
I don't know what any of that is. I wonder
if there's like emojis that are attached to these.
Speaker 1: I don't what are jewels exactly. I don't know. I've
never seen them before.
Speaker 3: I think they're like fractions of like so it's either
like five bucks or six bucks or to bucks with
the super chat, I think with jewels, it's like fractional
money or something like that.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: I saw that you could give gifts, and I don't
know what that is. It's all YouTube jewelry anyway. Just kidding,
all right, everybody, Yeah, check out our archive. We got
plenty of bangers. I'll be here all weekend. Have a
great weekend everybody, and see you later. Man are we
We're not live anymo