WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:53.359
<v Speaker 1>S S S S S S S S S S

2
00:00:58.759 --> 00:01:29.879
<v Speaker 1>S S S S S S S S.

3
00:01:35.239 --> 00:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>S.

4
00:02:56.759 --> 00:02:59.919
<v Speaker 3>All right, welcome, hope everybody's sir.

5
00:03:00.199 --> 00:03:04.520
<v Speaker 4>I woke up today to some fancy, flashy, sassy new

6
00:03:04.599 --> 00:03:07.439
<v Speaker 4>drama from the Internet's.

7
00:03:07.520 --> 00:03:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Hottest little boats Eie Wearer.

8
00:03:11.599 --> 00:03:17.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about that predestined as sunny occasionalist, Calvinist Muslim

9
00:03:17.879 --> 00:03:22.840
<v Speaker 4>man James Watt and his little cute little list that

10
00:03:22.919 --> 00:03:27.599
<v Speaker 4>he's got. He's just so in a tizzy today. He's

11
00:03:27.639 --> 00:03:30.560
<v Speaker 4>just sassy today. Something got up under him and got

12
00:03:30.599 --> 00:03:35.039
<v Speaker 4>him all sassed. I don't know what it is, but

13
00:03:35.240 --> 00:03:39.280
<v Speaker 4>if we're gonna go to Roman's nine, honey child, he's

14
00:03:39.400 --> 00:03:45.439
<v Speaker 4>our man. He can exege that perfectly. With that diploma

15
00:03:45.479 --> 00:03:47.919
<v Speaker 4>meal degree that he got down in South Africa, down

16
00:03:47.960 --> 00:03:51.560
<v Speaker 4>there with his little Ubungu friends that he's got. I

17
00:03:51.560 --> 00:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>wonder what they get up to down there with that

18
00:03:54.319 --> 00:03:56.199
<v Speaker 4>little lisp. He's got it and there's no telling them.

19
00:03:56.240 --> 00:03:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Maybe he did it. Maybe he did his diploma, diploma,

20
00:03:59.879 --> 00:04:04.479
<v Speaker 4>MA degree online. I think they have extension courses up

21
00:04:04.520 --> 00:04:08.319
<v Speaker 4>there for little James wherever he's located inside of his

22
00:04:08.360 --> 00:04:08.879
<v Speaker 4>little RV.

23
00:04:10.960 --> 00:04:12.840
<v Speaker 3>They might be over here in New Orleans right now.

24
00:04:12.879 --> 00:04:17.279
<v Speaker 4>If it's Marti Grauls time, I'm over here, about fifty

25
00:04:17.319 --> 00:04:19.639
<v Speaker 4>miles outside of New Orleans. I I could just run

26
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:22.360
<v Speaker 4>over there and find James if he's over there on

27
00:04:22.560 --> 00:04:25.920
<v Speaker 4>down in the French quarters. If he's down there, Exaget

28
00:04:25.920 --> 00:04:28.680
<v Speaker 4>and Romans nine for some of the some of the

29
00:04:28.759 --> 00:04:33.519
<v Speaker 4>men's over there in the French quarters. But listen, I'll

30
00:04:33.519 --> 00:04:35.399
<v Speaker 4>tell you one thing, honey, you ain't going to find

31
00:04:35.480 --> 00:04:39.519
<v Speaker 4>a better cosmusweater anywhere in the damn us than down

32
00:04:39.560 --> 00:04:42.079
<v Speaker 4>there in that French quarter. Some of them women's down

33
00:04:42.120 --> 00:04:45.240
<v Speaker 4>there that does the tarot reatings, the tarot cards, Honey,

34
00:04:45.319 --> 00:04:49.959
<v Speaker 4>Them tarot readers will sew you a Cosby sweater like

35
00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:54.199
<v Speaker 4>Joseph's technicolor dreamcoat, Honey, out of the doll of the

36
00:04:54.240 --> 00:04:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Book of Genesis, honey. And that's what James White's all about.

37
00:04:57.439 --> 00:04:59.879
<v Speaker 4>I hope James Whites will come over here and I

38
00:05:00.040 --> 00:05:01.319
<v Speaker 4>and just talk to him a little bit. But he's

39
00:05:01.319 --> 00:05:04.040
<v Speaker 4>got that cute little honey. Have you ever seen that

40
00:05:04.120 --> 00:05:06.879
<v Speaker 4>little Colonel Sanders.

41
00:05:06.439 --> 00:05:06.759
<v Speaker 5>Go to you?

42
00:05:06.879 --> 00:05:09.639
<v Speaker 4>He's got And it just makes me think all them

43
00:05:09.879 --> 00:05:12.519
<v Speaker 4>chickens that Biden had just killed, all one hundred fifty

44
00:05:12.560 --> 00:05:16.120
<v Speaker 4>billion of them. If I was thinking like James White

45
00:05:16.160 --> 00:05:20.040
<v Speaker 4>and that Colonel Sanders predestination mindset, they was destined for it, honey,

46
00:05:20.079 --> 00:05:23.439
<v Speaker 4>all one hundred fifty millions of them. Let's see, maybe

47
00:05:23.439 --> 00:05:25.720
<v Speaker 4>he'll come in here and tell us about Romans nine.

48
00:05:27.160 --> 00:05:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Romans nine, I'm just joking, being silly. I'm poisoning the well.

49
00:05:32.319 --> 00:05:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh wait, if I poison the well, it's on Christ.

50
00:05:36.519 --> 00:05:42.079
<v Speaker 4>Like when James White poisons the well, it's Boomer wisdom.

51
00:05:42.120 --> 00:05:43.439
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what he was trying to say.

52
00:05:43.439 --> 00:05:50.319
<v Speaker 4>If he doesn't debate a person with a green profile picture, wow,

53
00:05:50.399 --> 00:05:55.120
<v Speaker 4>those are good reasons. Now, for years, here's the backstory.

54
00:05:55.240 --> 00:05:58.560
<v Speaker 4>We messaged James White to do debates on.

55
00:05:58.560 --> 00:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>The Essen Center. You've seen Shin on Absolute to my Simplicity,

56
00:06:02.040 --> 00:06:03.959
<v Speaker 3>Tilly oak Way, all of that stuff.

57
00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:07.600
<v Speaker 4>And for years he said, in his little sassy tone,

58
00:06:07.720 --> 00:06:10.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know orthodox stuff. I just don't have tons

59
00:06:10.120 --> 00:06:13.639
<v Speaker 4>of debate I have, and he's just there's just too

60
00:06:13.680 --> 00:06:14.680
<v Speaker 4>much list thing I've.

61
00:06:14.560 --> 00:06:14.959
<v Speaker 3>Got to do.

62
00:06:15.079 --> 00:06:17.360
<v Speaker 6>I've got to study the art of the list.

63
00:06:17.199 --> 00:06:19.199
<v Speaker 3>And I don't have time to study orthodox stuff.

64
00:06:19.800 --> 00:06:24.160
<v Speaker 4>So he had no time for the last six seven years,

65
00:06:24.199 --> 00:06:30.439
<v Speaker 4>I guess, And now he wants to drive an RV

66
00:06:31.199 --> 00:06:34.319
<v Speaker 4>to debate me a year out, and what I guess

67
00:06:34.360 --> 00:06:36.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm supposed to like arrange this. I don't arrange in

68
00:06:36.759 --> 00:06:40.519
<v Speaker 4>person debates. I mean, I don't mind it. In person debate.

69
00:06:40.839 --> 00:06:45.879
<v Speaker 4>I've done one with Tim Gordon's brother in that ridiculous

70
00:06:45.879 --> 00:06:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Baptist pastor I don't remember his name, but that was

71
00:06:48.519 --> 00:06:53.680
<v Speaker 4>all organized by another podcast to settle that up. So

72
00:06:53.720 --> 00:06:55.879
<v Speaker 4>it's not that I'm completely opposed to it, but like

73
00:06:56.120 --> 00:06:58.279
<v Speaker 4>so William Albrech did this where he was like.

74
00:06:58.160 --> 00:07:00.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, debate you, but only.

75
00:07:00.079 --> 00:07:03.000
<v Speaker 4>In person six months from now, and it's like, okay,

76
00:07:03.040 --> 00:07:06.000
<v Speaker 4>so I'm supposed to establish and set up a public

77
00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:07.000
<v Speaker 4>in person debate for you.

78
00:07:07.079 --> 00:07:09.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm not doing all that shit, dude. You can hop

79
00:07:09.360 --> 00:07:10.639
<v Speaker 3>on a damn live streaming debate.

80
00:07:10.680 --> 00:07:12.600
<v Speaker 4>And by the way, all these people usually will debate

81
00:07:12.920 --> 00:07:17.160
<v Speaker 4>other people on live streams. And I think his like

82
00:07:17.480 --> 00:07:23.439
<v Speaker 4>scrawling screed today of boomer nonsense was quite amusing, Like

83
00:07:23.519 --> 00:07:27.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna have fun live streaming about this. So now

84
00:07:27.319 --> 00:07:30.639
<v Speaker 4>he calls into question my comedic capabilities.

85
00:07:30.720 --> 00:07:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Is he even a comedian?

86
00:07:32.399 --> 00:07:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'll have you know that I write for one

87
00:07:34.800 --> 00:07:36.879
<v Speaker 4>of the top comedians out there right now.

88
00:07:36.920 --> 00:07:39.720
<v Speaker 3>You may have heard the name Amy Schumer.

89
00:07:40.120 --> 00:07:40.519
<v Speaker 6>Thank you.

90
00:07:41.439 --> 00:07:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Now we're going to open it up today's topics or

91
00:07:44.639 --> 00:07:46.240
<v Speaker 4>whatever you guys want to talk about. I do not

92
00:07:46.319 --> 00:07:49.439
<v Speaker 4>think we're really going to get many calvin Is in here,

93
00:07:49.439 --> 00:07:52.480
<v Speaker 4>but of course Calvinism gets the priority place today for

94
00:07:52.839 --> 00:07:55.639
<v Speaker 4>discussion topic. So if you'd like to discuss the elements

95
00:07:55.639 --> 00:08:03.680
<v Speaker 4>of Calvinism, that could include predestination, tulip Calvins, institutes, reform theology, Puritans,

96
00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:04.480
<v Speaker 4>it could be any of that.

97
00:08:05.160 --> 00:08:07.519
<v Speaker 3>But we can also talk about, of course soul, scripturia.

98
00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>We can talk about.

99
00:08:10.399 --> 00:08:14.160
<v Speaker 4>The history of the church, councils, authority, you know, creeds

100
00:08:14.160 --> 00:08:15.879
<v Speaker 4>and confessions, church fathers.

101
00:08:16.920 --> 00:08:17.879
<v Speaker 3>It's all fair game.

102
00:08:19.120 --> 00:08:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Also, anything else related to the history of Protestantism, the

103
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:30.399
<v Speaker 4>prosct Church, Classical Reformation, Lutheranism, Baptist theology, whatever, Also Catholicism

104
00:08:30.480 --> 00:08:32.279
<v Speaker 4>is on the table. If you are a papist, you

105
00:08:32.320 --> 00:08:34.159
<v Speaker 4>may call in and make your arguments. If you are

106
00:08:34.159 --> 00:08:39.440
<v Speaker 4>a Muslim, the buddies of the Calvinists, because they believe

107
00:08:39.480 --> 00:08:44.840
<v Speaker 4>in essentially the Divine decree is the cause of all causes.

108
00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:48.559
<v Speaker 4>So Muslims are welcome to call in together with their

109
00:08:48.559 --> 00:08:51.919
<v Speaker 4>about buddy Calvinists and we can have a discussion with

110
00:08:51.960 --> 00:08:54.799
<v Speaker 4>it as well as the atheists.

111
00:08:56.399 --> 00:09:05.919
<v Speaker 3>It's open form today. First up is balance. You have

112
00:09:06.039 --> 00:09:06.480
<v Speaker 3>time you.

113
00:09:08.759 --> 00:09:11.879
<v Speaker 7>So, Jay, I wanted to talk to you about Protestism.

114
00:09:12.120 --> 00:09:12.639
<v Speaker 8>Can you hear me?

115
00:09:13.480 --> 00:09:13.720
<v Speaker 3>Yep?

116
00:09:14.519 --> 00:09:18.679
<v Speaker 7>So I've been looking into Catholicism and Orthodoxy for a

117
00:09:18.720 --> 00:09:22.639
<v Speaker 7>little while now. I was born and raised in Protestant Church. Well,

118
00:09:22.679 --> 00:09:25.759
<v Speaker 7>Costolicism never like intrigued me because Swols is gay with

119
00:09:25.879 --> 00:09:29.519
<v Speaker 7>the Pope god Man. But Orthodoxy always intrigued me. And

120
00:09:29.559 --> 00:09:33.559
<v Speaker 7>my question is because I'm I've always thought about conditionalism.

121
00:09:33.639 --> 00:09:37.559
<v Speaker 7>It's being biblical. And my main point is Isaiah. I

122
00:09:37.559 --> 00:09:40.679
<v Speaker 7>guess chapter sixty six, verses twenty two to twenty four

123
00:09:41.279 --> 00:09:45.000
<v Speaker 7>referred by Jesus and Mark when he says he sends

124
00:09:45.039 --> 00:09:49.440
<v Speaker 7>them to the outer room of darkness where the national

125
00:09:49.519 --> 00:09:53.600
<v Speaker 7>teeth and they become objects of content and their corpses

126
00:09:53.759 --> 00:09:56.799
<v Speaker 7>refer to Isaiah. So how is that like not like

127
00:09:56.919 --> 00:09:59.440
<v Speaker 7>them dying in hell? If that's where they go and

128
00:09:59.480 --> 00:10:01.519
<v Speaker 7>they're they become coarse corpses.

129
00:10:01.840 --> 00:10:06.000
<v Speaker 3>And I didn't hear what you were saying. Conditionalism? What

130
00:10:06.120 --> 00:10:06.279
<v Speaker 3>is that?

131
00:10:06.799 --> 00:10:10.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's basically now where people do you know die

132
00:10:10.480 --> 00:10:12.679
<v Speaker 7>in hell? Annihilism they call it.

133
00:10:13.600 --> 00:10:18.440
<v Speaker 3>You're talking about annihilationism not not yet, my bad, Yeah,

134
00:10:18.480 --> 00:10:21.039
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Bible doesn't teach annihilationism. It teaches that

135
00:10:21.120 --> 00:10:23.720
<v Speaker 3>both the body and the soul are joined together in

136
00:10:23.759 --> 00:10:26.440
<v Speaker 3>the resurrection for all eternity, and that's based on the

137
00:10:26.480 --> 00:10:28.480
<v Speaker 3>work of Christ. So in One Tear the fifteen Paul

138
00:10:28.519 --> 00:10:32.080
<v Speaker 3>makes it very clear that your resurrection, whoever you are,

139
00:10:32.240 --> 00:10:36.279
<v Speaker 3>is contingent upon Christ's resurrection and defeating death. But that

140
00:10:36.320 --> 00:10:37.519
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean that you're going to have.

141
00:10:37.639 --> 00:10:41.559
<v Speaker 4>Necessarily a good experience of the escaton if you're wicked.

142
00:10:42.279 --> 00:10:46.240
<v Speaker 4>The wicked have ever being, but they have ever ill being.

143
00:10:46.440 --> 00:10:49.279
<v Speaker 4>The righteous have ever being as well, but they have

144
00:10:49.399 --> 00:10:50.399
<v Speaker 4>ever well being.

145
00:10:52.919 --> 00:10:55.679
<v Speaker 7>All right, that makes sense. I just when you look

146
00:10:55.720 --> 00:10:58.320
<v Speaker 7>at like mark and stuff. When Jesus talking about like

147
00:10:58.440 --> 00:11:00.879
<v Speaker 7>them can turn in the outer of darkness and the

148
00:11:00.960 --> 00:11:03.559
<v Speaker 7>national teeth, he says, it's going to be where the

149
00:11:03.559 --> 00:11:06.840
<v Speaker 7>fire doesn't quench and where the worm doesn't die. And

150
00:11:07.000 --> 00:11:10.039
<v Speaker 7>in Isaiah that's where like there are objects of contempt

151
00:11:10.159 --> 00:11:11.000
<v Speaker 7>and their corpses.

152
00:11:11.159 --> 00:11:16.360
<v Speaker 4>I understand that, but the language is intending to discuss

153
00:11:15.240 --> 00:11:20.279
<v Speaker 4>a spiritual state. It's not literally saying that they have

154
00:11:20.360 --> 00:11:23.559
<v Speaker 4>a worm because the worm, according to the Church Fathers, typically

155
00:11:23.639 --> 00:11:26.919
<v Speaker 4>is the pangs of conscience. So they're tormented by their

156
00:11:26.919 --> 00:11:29.720
<v Speaker 4>conscience for what they did and what they didn't do

157
00:11:29.759 --> 00:11:33.960
<v Speaker 4>in life, they didn't repent, et cetera. But the fire

158
00:11:34.080 --> 00:11:38.759
<v Speaker 4>there is it's not everlasting darkness if it's literal fire, right,

159
00:11:39.159 --> 00:11:44.159
<v Speaker 4>So it's the descriptions of separation from the goodness of God,

160
00:11:44.360 --> 00:11:46.720
<v Speaker 4>not separation from the presence of God. And that's why

161
00:11:46.759 --> 00:11:50.240
<v Speaker 4>in the Orthodox of you, the divine energy that is

162
00:11:50.759 --> 00:11:54.759
<v Speaker 4>the river of life is the same divine energy that

163
00:11:55.000 --> 00:11:58.799
<v Speaker 4>is the lake of fire. It's just contingent upon the

164
00:11:58.840 --> 00:12:01.639
<v Speaker 4>mode of being of each individual person as to how

165
00:12:01.679 --> 00:12:05.279
<v Speaker 4>that's experienced in the afterlife. So if you lived unrighteously

166
00:12:05.320 --> 00:12:07.480
<v Speaker 4>and not according to Christ in this life, you're still

167
00:12:07.480 --> 00:12:10.720
<v Speaker 4>going to get resurrected on the basis of Christ, and

168
00:12:10.799 --> 00:12:13.120
<v Speaker 4>you're still going to experience God and the Eskaton, but

169
00:12:13.159 --> 00:12:16.759
<v Speaker 4>you're going to experience the divine energies as the thing

170
00:12:16.799 --> 00:12:18.679
<v Speaker 4>that torments you because you hated God.

171
00:12:20.080 --> 00:12:21.200
<v Speaker 7>All right, Yeah, that makes sense.

172
00:12:21.240 --> 00:12:21.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

173
00:12:21.440 --> 00:12:23.120
<v Speaker 7>I wasn't trying to like make a correlation of it

174
00:12:23.159 --> 00:12:26.120
<v Speaker 7>being dark. I know it wasn't being literal obviously, because

175
00:12:26.120 --> 00:12:29.519
<v Speaker 7>of the flames. But the analogy whatever you were saying

176
00:12:29.519 --> 00:12:31.759
<v Speaker 7>with the warm that makes sense. I never heard anyone

177
00:12:31.840 --> 00:12:33.639
<v Speaker 7>say that, And trying to like research and see what

178
00:12:33.720 --> 00:12:35.279
<v Speaker 7>other people's thoughts were.

179
00:12:35.080 --> 00:12:38.120
<v Speaker 4>All thees Gaton Paul says that in One Green Is fifteen,

180
00:12:38.159 --> 00:12:41.799
<v Speaker 4>God becomes all and in all and the extent of

181
00:12:41.960 --> 00:12:44.679
<v Speaker 4>the resurrection. The scope of the resurrection in First Green

182
00:12:44.840 --> 00:12:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Is fifteen is just as expansive and universal as the

183
00:12:48.759 --> 00:12:52.240
<v Speaker 4>scope of Adams Fall. So that means that everyone, even

184
00:12:52.320 --> 00:12:55.360
<v Speaker 4>tiny mustache man like, the only basis for him to be.

185
00:12:55.360 --> 00:12:57.759
<v Speaker 3>Resurrection resurrected is the worst of Christ.

186
00:12:58.559 --> 00:13:01.240
<v Speaker 4>So this also, by the way, we're fu's Calvinism, because

187
00:13:01.279 --> 00:13:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Calvinism never really understands or explains why the wicked or

188
00:13:04.360 --> 00:13:07.879
<v Speaker 4>resurrected or the reprobate would be resurrected because they have

189
00:13:07.919 --> 00:13:10.200
<v Speaker 4>no connection to Christ. And so Calvinists just have to

190
00:13:10.200 --> 00:13:12.960
<v Speaker 4>say stuff like, well, God just arbitrarily creates a hell

191
00:13:13.000 --> 00:13:17.799
<v Speaker 4>body for them, Padre Pio, why'd you run away? I'm

192
00:13:17.799 --> 00:13:19.799
<v Speaker 4>about to bring up a Roman Catholic and you literally

193
00:13:19.840 --> 00:13:23.480
<v Speaker 4>just drop out. So it's funny, like, and people love

194
00:13:23.559 --> 00:13:27.000
<v Speaker 4>to just talk Tomac on Twitter all day long. James

195
00:13:27.000 --> 00:13:30.960
<v Speaker 4>White wants to schedule a debate on topics that are

196
00:13:31.039 --> 00:13:33.480
<v Speaker 4>not the topics that I asked them debate for many years,

197
00:13:33.799 --> 00:13:37.399
<v Speaker 4>totally different topics, and then but he can't hop on

198
00:13:37.440 --> 00:13:40.440
<v Speaker 4>his face and have this discussion. So yeah, it's just

199
00:13:40.480 --> 00:13:43.399
<v Speaker 4>really like another thing that people don't know maybe about

200
00:13:43.399 --> 00:13:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Calvinist is I was in that world when I was young,

201
00:13:46.279 --> 00:13:49.759
<v Speaker 4>and Calvinists really like their whole thing. They thrive on

202
00:13:51.159 --> 00:13:56.000
<v Speaker 4>being recognized and being seen as scholars and intellectuals, like

203
00:13:56.039 --> 00:13:58.919
<v Speaker 4>that's the whole religion. It's a it's a kind of

204
00:13:58.919 --> 00:14:04.039
<v Speaker 4>a it's like just a biblical almost Talmudic version of

205
00:14:04.080 --> 00:14:08.919
<v Speaker 4>what you know, papal scholastic people want to be right,

206
00:14:09.000 --> 00:14:13.399
<v Speaker 4>Scholastic nerds have a lot more philosophy. But both the

207
00:14:13.440 --> 00:14:19.240
<v Speaker 4>Calvinists scholastic want to be and the papal scholastic tomist

208
00:14:19.320 --> 00:14:21.919
<v Speaker 4>want to be they're really just worshiping intellect.

209
00:14:21.960 --> 00:14:23.879
<v Speaker 3>The whole religion is about intellect.

210
00:14:23.679 --> 00:14:28.240
<v Speaker 4>And being perceived as intellectual and known as intellectual and

211
00:14:28.480 --> 00:14:33.080
<v Speaker 4>given the validation of being an intellectual through debate. So

212
00:14:33.200 --> 00:14:35.080
<v Speaker 4>one of the things that I've learned over the years

213
00:14:35.080 --> 00:14:39.159
<v Speaker 4>that is very important is Calvinists do not at all

214
00:14:39.279 --> 00:14:42.039
<v Speaker 4>enjoy being mocked or made fun of because they take

215
00:14:42.080 --> 00:14:45.120
<v Speaker 4>themselves very seriously. And of course everyone could see that

216
00:14:45.440 --> 00:14:49.919
<v Speaker 4>in all the silly shit that he's posted today, James White,

217
00:14:50.639 --> 00:14:53.200
<v Speaker 4>it's all like, really, like this man, there's not a.

218
00:14:54.879 --> 00:14:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Scholar.

219
00:14:55.480 --> 00:14:59.039
<v Speaker 4>He's got a green of photo of himself and he's

220
00:14:59.080 --> 00:15:04.360
<v Speaker 4>got a photo of weird background images. The background images,

221
00:15:04.399 --> 00:15:06.600
<v Speaker 4>for those that don't know, has a bunch of fascinating

222
00:15:06.720 --> 00:15:10.759
<v Speaker 4>lore in it that my buddy and good friend Mark Rowe,

223
00:15:10.840 --> 00:15:17.639
<v Speaker 4>who is a very well known documentary filmmaker and a cinematographer,

224
00:15:18.200 --> 00:15:20.679
<v Speaker 4>just made as a joke. So like a lot of

225
00:15:20.679 --> 00:15:22.799
<v Speaker 4>the stuff, people don't even know what the jokes are.

226
00:15:22.840 --> 00:15:25.320
<v Speaker 4>They don't get it, but that's to be expected. I mean,

227
00:15:25.960 --> 00:15:28.080
<v Speaker 4>it's just like you know, the humor of Sam Hyde,

228
00:15:28.080 --> 00:15:33.080
<v Speaker 4>nobody over age, I don't know, fifty maybe even forty five,

229
00:15:33.120 --> 00:15:35.799
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Like they don't typically care or get

230
00:15:36.039 --> 00:15:37.240
<v Speaker 4>that kind of humor like that.

231
00:15:37.399 --> 00:15:38.759
<v Speaker 3>That's the generation gap.

232
00:15:39.399 --> 00:15:43.000
<v Speaker 4>So although technically James White's probably gen X, I mean,

233
00:15:43.039 --> 00:15:44.720
<v Speaker 4>the whole mindset, the whole ethos here is just like

234
00:15:44.720 --> 00:15:47.399
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent boomer for sure. But the point being

235
00:15:47.480 --> 00:15:49.679
<v Speaker 4>is like, now, of course he's not gonna they're not

236
00:15:49.720 --> 00:15:52.600
<v Speaker 4>gonna grasp or get like, well, what all we're talking about?

237
00:15:52.600 --> 00:15:57.879
<v Speaker 4>What we're about over here? But also like it's important

238
00:15:57.919 --> 00:15:59.440
<v Speaker 4>not to validate.

239
00:15:59.039 --> 00:16:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Quote unquote these people's like perception of being quote a scholar.

240
00:16:03.639 --> 00:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>You notice I don't care about that. I gave up.

241
00:16:05.759 --> 00:16:08.399
<v Speaker 3>I could care less about that shit. I used to

242
00:16:08.440 --> 00:16:09.000
<v Speaker 3>care about.

243
00:16:08.840 --> 00:16:12.240
<v Speaker 4>That, especially when I was a Roman Catholic Thomas. You know,

244
00:16:12.600 --> 00:16:16.000
<v Speaker 4>when I went from Calvinist to Thomas, I was very

245
00:16:16.000 --> 00:16:18.720
<v Speaker 4>interested in academia, very interesting getting my degree. I want

246
00:16:18.759 --> 00:16:21.960
<v Speaker 4>to be seen as, oh, I'm a scholar. And then

247
00:16:22.039 --> 00:16:25.000
<v Speaker 4>once I realized that all that shits retarded and the

248
00:16:25.039 --> 00:16:28.799
<v Speaker 4>people in these movements are actually just retarded, and that

249
00:16:28.879 --> 00:16:30.919
<v Speaker 4>I actually I would respect a person who could actually

250
00:16:31.000 --> 00:16:32.559
<v Speaker 4>like a guy who actually go out and punch somebody

251
00:16:32.559 --> 00:16:34.639
<v Speaker 4>in the face and have a fight way better than

252
00:16:34.639 --> 00:16:37.039
<v Speaker 4>I would respect any of these so called pastors. I mean,

253
00:16:37.080 --> 00:16:39.240
<v Speaker 4>what did we just see yesterday. One of the biggest

254
00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:44.039
<v Speaker 4>megachurch pastors is basically Reverend Tuttle from true detective like

255
00:16:44.080 --> 00:16:49.840
<v Speaker 4>the literal pedo, like raping kids, you know, Protestant Evangelical

256
00:16:49.879 --> 00:16:54.159
<v Speaker 4>megachurch pastor. So I mean, what does that tell you like,

257
00:16:54.200 --> 00:16:57.480
<v Speaker 4>these people are just like literal trash and scum, and

258
00:16:57.519 --> 00:17:00.000
<v Speaker 4>they want to be seen as like these super intellectuals.

259
00:17:00.679 --> 00:17:02.600
<v Speaker 4>They're not even worth anybody's time. And by the way,

260
00:17:02.639 --> 00:17:04.880
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the Calvinists on the Twitter spaces are

261
00:17:04.880 --> 00:17:08.519
<v Speaker 4>complete trash too, the ones that fake that their wives

262
00:17:08.559 --> 00:17:12.200
<v Speaker 4>are submissive prairie muffins. That other guy the other day,

263
00:17:12.200 --> 00:17:14.279
<v Speaker 4>I think he was a Calvinist that was a fake

264
00:17:14.359 --> 00:17:17.599
<v Speaker 4>saying he was logging in and tweeting at this fake

265
00:17:17.680 --> 00:17:19.200
<v Speaker 4>wife account like.

266
00:17:19.279 --> 00:17:20.319
<v Speaker 3>That she was submissive.

267
00:17:21.079 --> 00:17:23.680
<v Speaker 4>And then you got Joel Webbin over here, who's like, uh,

268
00:17:24.119 --> 00:17:26.799
<v Speaker 4>basically wants to be a Salafie Muslim as a Calvinist.

269
00:17:26.920 --> 00:17:30.160
<v Speaker 4>All these Calvinists just need to go be freaking Muslims.

270
00:17:30.160 --> 00:17:32.160
<v Speaker 4>They need to be they need to be Salafie well Hobby,

271
00:17:32.200 --> 00:17:34.960
<v Speaker 4>they need to go be buddies with Jake and Daniel

272
00:17:35.000 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 4>Hikikachu because that's where they'd fit in. Jamie said, Joel

273
00:17:42.039 --> 00:17:45.359
<v Speaker 4>Webbin believes in Mermaids unironically, which is.

274
00:17:45.400 --> 00:17:46.759
<v Speaker 3>Kind of funny. And now a bunch of the audience

275
00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:47.319
<v Speaker 3>are going to be.

276
00:17:47.240 --> 00:17:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Like, oh, actually I like Joel Webbin though, because there's

277
00:17:49.720 --> 00:17:52.839
<v Speaker 4>probably a lot of other mrmaid appreciators in this chat,

278
00:17:53.119 --> 00:17:55.279
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of there's a lot of people with

279
00:17:55.319 --> 00:17:59.480
<v Speaker 4>their crushes on Ariel over here. But didn't you know

280
00:17:59.599 --> 00:18:06.200
<v Speaker 4>Ariel from Little Mermaid is actually a Jewish plot because

281
00:18:06.240 --> 00:18:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Ariel is the name for Israel.

282
00:18:07.480 --> 00:18:10.759
<v Speaker 3>I'm just joking as a joke, and.

283
00:18:10.720 --> 00:18:12.400
<v Speaker 4>I would I'd like to remind you all again I

284
00:18:12.440 --> 00:18:14.599
<v Speaker 4>am one of the top comedy writers.

285
00:18:14.640 --> 00:18:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Now I did finagle my way into that position.

286
00:18:17.039 --> 00:18:20.720
<v Speaker 4>James White's questioning my comedic skill sets.

287
00:18:20.920 --> 00:18:25.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll have you all know I am the.

288
00:18:24.440 --> 00:18:27.519
<v Speaker 4>Top comedy writer for somebody you might have heard of,

289
00:18:27.839 --> 00:18:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Brendan Shaub.

290
00:18:29.200 --> 00:18:29.519
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

291
00:18:30.319 --> 00:18:34.319
<v Speaker 4>Anybody else wants to come on to the chat. If

292
00:18:34.319 --> 00:18:36.400
<v Speaker 4>you hit request to speak, I'll bring you up. You

293
00:18:36.400 --> 00:18:39.960
<v Speaker 4>can ask questions in regard to Calvinism all the way.

294
00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:41.039
<v Speaker 3>James White's actually.

295
00:18:40.839 --> 00:18:47.200
<v Speaker 4>A ridiculous radical proponent of stupid ads. So I want

296
00:18:47.359 --> 00:18:50.880
<v Speaker 4>to debate him about that. Actually initially, and we were

297
00:18:50.880 --> 00:18:52.880
<v Speaker 4>going to talk about Philly Oakuay and all that stuff,

298
00:18:53.680 --> 00:18:56.400
<v Speaker 4>and he said multiple times over the years, I don't

299
00:18:56.400 --> 00:18:59.400
<v Speaker 4>debate orthodox stuff because I don't have time for it.

300
00:18:59.440 --> 00:19:00.720
<v Speaker 4>So he just sort of dismissed it.

301
00:19:01.119 --> 00:19:04.400
<v Speaker 3>And then I asked again about that sinceni.

302
00:19:04.079 --> 00:19:06.680
<v Speaker 4>In distinction, And then we asked Jeff Durbin when back

303
00:19:06.680 --> 00:19:09.119
<v Speaker 4>when Durbin was like in the circles or adjacent to

304
00:19:09.720 --> 00:19:12.279
<v Speaker 4>James White was saying at one point, oh, you know,

305
00:19:12.920 --> 00:19:15.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't really have time go out go tobate James Derbin.

306
00:19:16.359 --> 00:19:19.680
<v Speaker 4>So Durbin said, if you would like to debate me,

307
00:19:19.799 --> 00:19:23.200
<v Speaker 4>there's a good in line You're it's at least one

308
00:19:23.279 --> 00:19:27.000
<v Speaker 4>year out. And I'm just like, how, like, how much

309
00:19:27.039 --> 00:19:28.920
<v Speaker 4>first of all, how much prep do you actually need

310
00:19:29.279 --> 00:19:31.599
<v Speaker 4>if you're a damn Calvinist, Like you can't just defend

311
00:19:31.640 --> 00:19:35.640
<v Speaker 4>your position on the spot, Like, how much more prep

312
00:19:35.680 --> 00:19:38.039
<v Speaker 4>do you actually need if you've been at Calvinist for

313
00:19:38.160 --> 00:19:41.680
<v Speaker 4>freaking twenty thirty years? I mean when I was a Calvinist,

314
00:19:41.680 --> 00:19:45.160
<v Speaker 4>like a defendant on the spot, and pretty much really

315
00:19:45.200 --> 00:19:48.720
<v Speaker 4>any position, like if it's a really difficult issue, like

316
00:19:48.799 --> 00:19:50.160
<v Speaker 4>let's say we wanted to have a debate with a

317
00:19:50.200 --> 00:19:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholic on We're going to debate, you know, the

318
00:19:55.319 --> 00:19:58.640
<v Speaker 4>geopolitical power of the papacy, which I keep trying to

319
00:19:58.640 --> 00:20:00.359
<v Speaker 4>get Roman Catholics to do, and none the will do it.

320
00:20:01.079 --> 00:20:03.759
<v Speaker 4>Like I would understand somebody requesting time for that because

321
00:20:03.759 --> 00:20:06.480
<v Speaker 4>that's a difficult nuance, a lot of time and effort.

322
00:20:07.039 --> 00:20:09.200
<v Speaker 4>But like if you're a Calvinist, like we all know too,

323
00:20:09.480 --> 00:20:12.119
<v Speaker 4>we all know predestination, we all know you know institutes,

324
00:20:12.200 --> 00:20:13.519
<v Speaker 4>we all know Westminster Confession.

325
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:18.039
<v Speaker 3>Like how much real prep you actually need on Ross?

326
00:20:28.759 --> 00:20:31.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah?

327
00:20:31.079 --> 00:20:34.559
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's up, Yeah yeah yeah, I say, said, I

328
00:20:34.599 --> 00:20:39.559
<v Speaker 11>am here, so I wanted to speak with you. I

329
00:20:39.599 --> 00:20:42.799
<v Speaker 11>have a friend with the Roman Catholic I am Ortodox,

330
00:20:43.880 --> 00:20:47.319
<v Speaker 11>and I watched your video on iconography on the seventeen

331
00:20:47.359 --> 00:20:53.160
<v Speaker 11>you Manical Concil, and he raped the objection that viality

332
00:20:53.319 --> 00:20:56.079
<v Speaker 11>matter in which style is the icon.

333
00:20:56.759 --> 00:20:58.759
<v Speaker 3>So I can't understand what you're saying.

334
00:20:58.759 --> 00:21:01.359
<v Speaker 4>You watched the video I did on the seventh Ecmmenical Council,

335
00:21:01.400 --> 00:21:03.039
<v Speaker 4>and we've done about four of those, so I'm not

336
00:21:03.079 --> 00:21:03.319
<v Speaker 4>sure what.

337
00:21:04.000 --> 00:21:08.880
<v Speaker 11>Recent one on iconography where you argued that the current style,

338
00:21:09.400 --> 00:21:14.960
<v Speaker 11>like in the fifteenth century the Roman Catholics used is incorrect.

339
00:21:15.480 --> 00:21:16.960
<v Speaker 10>And I read.

340
00:21:16.799 --> 00:21:20.720
<v Speaker 11>The seventh Ecumenical councils canons and I couldn't find anything

341
00:21:20.960 --> 00:21:25.559
<v Speaker 11>about that that.

342
00:21:23.759 --> 00:21:24.640
<v Speaker 3>I already addressed that.

343
00:21:24.720 --> 00:21:28.559
<v Speaker 4>So the seventh Ecumenical Council has multiple canons that do

344
00:21:28.680 --> 00:21:33.759
<v Speaker 4>address icons, and then one hundred years later almost in

345
00:21:33.799 --> 00:21:36.359
<v Speaker 4>the eight forty three Council, it's called the Triumph of

346
00:21:36.519 --> 00:21:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Orthodoxy where they create the Sonoticon and they restate all

347
00:21:41.680 --> 00:21:44.920
<v Speaker 4>of the canons and the victory or ecume me the

348
00:21:44.960 --> 00:21:48.839
<v Speaker 4>principles of the Seventh Ecumenical Council. So the Sonoticon is

349
00:21:48.880 --> 00:21:52.359
<v Speaker 4>a summary of the Seventh Ecumenical Council and.

350
00:21:52.440 --> 00:21:55.119
<v Speaker 3>Includes all those principles. So just look up the full

351
00:21:55.160 --> 00:21:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Sonoticon of Orthodoxy which includes all that.

352
00:21:58.799 --> 00:22:02.920
<v Speaker 11>Okay, thank you. But so if it's wrong to use

353
00:22:02.960 --> 00:22:05.359
<v Speaker 11>a different style of iconography and then.

354
00:22:05.319 --> 00:22:07.799
<v Speaker 4>What they use, I mean, I literally address that it

355
00:22:07.799 --> 00:22:09.640
<v Speaker 4>has nothing to do with styles. If you watch the

356
00:22:09.720 --> 00:22:11.799
<v Speaker 4>video that you're talking about that I did, that was

357
00:22:11.839 --> 00:22:14.799
<v Speaker 4>like twenty minutes of a live stream. I literally sat

358
00:22:14.839 --> 00:22:16.960
<v Speaker 4>in there. That it's not an issue of the style

359
00:22:17.039 --> 00:22:20.640
<v Speaker 4>of the icon. It's rather an issue in other words,

360
00:22:20.720 --> 00:22:22.480
<v Speaker 4>artistic style. I mean, you could talk I'll talk to

361
00:22:22.519 --> 00:22:25.680
<v Speaker 4>any Orthodox iconographer and they'll tell you that they at times,

362
00:22:26.079 --> 00:22:29.839
<v Speaker 4>you know, utilize their own individual style and creativity. So

363
00:22:29.880 --> 00:22:33.079
<v Speaker 4>there's room for flexibility there. But the point is that

364
00:22:33.200 --> 00:22:36.599
<v Speaker 4>there's norms that you don't, for example, paint a bunch

365
00:22:36.640 --> 00:22:40.160
<v Speaker 4>of boobies and titties and you know, butts and dick

366
00:22:40.240 --> 00:22:41.799
<v Speaker 4>hanging out like the Vatican has.

367
00:22:41.839 --> 00:22:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Like it's obvious. So like what I'm saying isn't even controversial.

368
00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:48.680
<v Speaker 4>If you read the Lost Kyalspensky books volume one and two,

369
00:22:48.799 --> 00:22:49.799
<v Speaker 4>they're not even that long.

370
00:22:50.559 --> 00:22:52.119
<v Speaker 3>It just talks about all the same stuff.

371
00:22:52.880 --> 00:22:55.160
<v Speaker 10>Okay, yeah, thank you, that's just my quession.

372
00:22:55.240 --> 00:23:00.599
<v Speaker 4>All right, Yeah, no good questions. I'mpre sire that all right, Dave,

373
00:23:00.640 --> 00:23:15.240
<v Speaker 4>what's up, Dave? You don't want to talk?

374
00:23:15.279 --> 00:23:26.480
<v Speaker 3>What's going on? And then Dave leaves?

375
00:23:26.680 --> 00:23:29.920
<v Speaker 4>So Dave the Muslim didn't want to talk, all right,

376
00:23:29.920 --> 00:23:34.519
<v Speaker 4>so it's open for him. Any questions regarding Calvinism, Protestantism, Evangelicalism,

377
00:23:34.759 --> 00:23:40.920
<v Speaker 4>from Catholicism, church history, biblical theology, Islam, Atheism, E request

378
00:23:40.960 --> 00:23:44.359
<v Speaker 4>to speak. I'll bring you up. You can ask a

379
00:23:44.440 --> 00:23:48.720
<v Speaker 4>question or you can offer an argument. You can listen

380
00:23:48.759 --> 00:23:51.839
<v Speaker 4>to your reasons why you think X y Z is wrong.

381
00:23:52.640 --> 00:23:56.720
<v Speaker 4>Just keep it to making arguments. And you know it's

382
00:23:56.759 --> 00:23:59.400
<v Speaker 4>that other Calvinists too, I forget his name, say awful

383
00:23:59.440 --> 00:24:01.000
<v Speaker 4>us or something like.

384
00:24:01.640 --> 00:24:03.759
<v Speaker 3>He's like you need to do a blog debate with me.

385
00:24:03.880 --> 00:24:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't do debates. That's exactly what Lofton said. Lofton's

386
00:24:07.000 --> 00:24:10.319
<v Speaker 3>like Jay Dieks turned down a debate with me, dog,

387
00:24:10.920 --> 00:24:12.880
<v Speaker 3>and then he doesn't tell you that the debate offer

388
00:24:12.960 --> 00:24:16.799
<v Speaker 3>was a blog debate. Like, dude, this is twenty twenty five,

389
00:24:16.960 --> 00:24:22.039
<v Speaker 3>broh Ain't nobody blog except maybe like some substack people.

390
00:24:22.039 --> 00:24:24.920
<v Speaker 4>But I'm not debating you in an exchange of substacks.

391
00:24:25.480 --> 00:24:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Anything I write is going into a stupid book. Dude.

392
00:24:27.920 --> 00:24:30.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm not writing for free anymore. It's going in a book.

393
00:24:30.920 --> 00:24:33.720
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know what what what these people are

394
00:24:33.960 --> 00:24:36.119
<v Speaker 4>that boomers like you want to come debate on Facebook

395
00:24:36.160 --> 00:24:38.200
<v Speaker 4>exchange and like, dude, get the hell out of here,

396
00:24:39.240 --> 00:24:45.400
<v Speaker 4>go back to Facebook. Uh, boomer Land, Today's funny because

397
00:24:45.400 --> 00:24:47.440
<v Speaker 4>it's all like boomer shit too like. And I will

398
00:24:47.519 --> 00:24:50.240
<v Speaker 4>never stop making boomer jokes. I'm the damn grandfather of

399
00:24:50.279 --> 00:24:54.680
<v Speaker 4>boomer jokes. I will proudly tout that as part of

400
00:24:54.720 --> 00:24:58.079
<v Speaker 4>my credit, I wrote a viral article fifteen years ago

401
00:24:58.119 --> 00:25:01.000
<v Speaker 4>making fun of boomers whenever world internet.

402
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Back of the day.

403
00:25:02.079 --> 00:25:04.319
<v Speaker 4>And I will keep making fun of boomers even when

404
00:25:04.319 --> 00:25:08.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm a freaking nine year old senior citizen man and

405
00:25:08.119 --> 00:25:10.440
<v Speaker 4>the boomers don't exist. I'm still gonna be telling the

406
00:25:10.480 --> 00:25:13.039
<v Speaker 4>youngsters the lore of Boomer bullshit.

407
00:25:13.440 --> 00:25:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Where'd that guy go? He drops everybody popping on here?

408
00:25:15.759 --> 00:25:18.480
<v Speaker 3>Drops off? Where you all at? Come on now now,

409
00:25:19.319 --> 00:25:25.599
<v Speaker 3>Oh now, Uncle Baby Billy's Bible bunkers, Come on now,

410
00:25:25.640 --> 00:25:35.799
<v Speaker 3>step up. Somebody got to step up. Oh now, get up, anybody,

411
00:25:36.039 --> 00:25:41.000
<v Speaker 3>it's Uncle Baby Billy's Bible bunkers. Step on up and

412
00:25:41.039 --> 00:25:45.279
<v Speaker 3>be quizzed. Gets your worldview tested, get your worldview put

413
00:25:45.319 --> 00:25:56.079
<v Speaker 3>in check? All right, we got hasani hey, dudekay.

414
00:25:57.279 --> 00:25:59.599
<v Speaker 12>I don't necessarily, I guess it kind of does apply

415
00:25:59.680 --> 00:26:01.960
<v Speaker 12>to the town topics, but I don't have anything that's

416
00:26:02.000 --> 00:26:07.720
<v Speaker 12>like specific to to one of the individual topics. I

417
00:26:07.880 --> 00:26:11.400
<v Speaker 12>just actually I had a question about something regardless. Obviously

418
00:26:12.559 --> 00:26:14.440
<v Speaker 12>I was in the obviously I was the one that

419
00:26:14.519 --> 00:26:16.160
<v Speaker 12>was sent in the super chests last night, and that

420
00:26:16.200 --> 00:26:21.839
<v Speaker 12>little and the thing with hypocrite and me and me

421
00:26:21.920 --> 00:26:23.599
<v Speaker 12>and a couple of dud we were we were really

422
00:26:23.640 --> 00:26:26.240
<v Speaker 12>going back and forth with a couple of guys in

423
00:26:26.319 --> 00:26:30.279
<v Speaker 12>the in the chat. There were two of them specifically, well,

424
00:26:30.359 --> 00:26:32.000
<v Speaker 12>one that I was going back and forth with like

425
00:26:32.079 --> 00:26:35.319
<v Speaker 12>the entire fucking time. Y'all are alive, Uh, and that

426
00:26:35.319 --> 00:26:36.839
<v Speaker 12>that's actually what I wanted to ask about. And there

427
00:26:36.880 --> 00:26:38.640
<v Speaker 12>was some other dude he was he was literally just there.

428
00:26:38.680 --> 00:26:41.720
<v Speaker 12>We figured out he was just there to troll you specifically.

429
00:26:41.880 --> 00:26:44.119
<v Speaker 12>He I don't know who he is, have no clue

430
00:26:44.119 --> 00:26:46.039
<v Speaker 12>where he came from, but that guy fucking hates you.

431
00:26:46.079 --> 00:26:48.200
<v Speaker 12>I don't know who it is, but yeah, he definitely

432
00:26:48.240 --> 00:26:48.559
<v Speaker 12>hates you.

433
00:26:49.599 --> 00:26:50.799
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well what was the profile?

434
00:26:52.799 --> 00:26:54.799
<v Speaker 12>It was just it was just Joe. It was like

435
00:26:54.920 --> 00:26:58.200
<v Speaker 12>Joe and the last name started with an H. And

436
00:26:58.240 --> 00:27:03.200
<v Speaker 12>he was He's some gnostic, that's the thing he was.

437
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:07.240
<v Speaker 12>He was being like very very fun. The damn word

438
00:27:07.440 --> 00:27:10.279
<v Speaker 12>the word is escape me. Like we kept on asking

439
00:27:10.559 --> 00:27:13.319
<v Speaker 12>questions about about you know, like his views and ship

440
00:27:13.400 --> 00:27:13.559
<v Speaker 12>like that.

441
00:27:13.880 --> 00:27:14.000
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

442
00:27:14.240 --> 00:27:16.799
<v Speaker 12>And the only thing he would specify, like, the only

443
00:27:16.880 --> 00:27:20.960
<v Speaker 12>thing he specified is he tends to lean towards gnostic

444
00:27:21.039 --> 00:27:23.960
<v Speaker 12>beliefs about But then he wouldn't and he just he

445
00:27:23.960 --> 00:27:26.839
<v Speaker 12>would literally say about and dot he wouldn't. He would

446
00:27:26.880 --> 00:27:29.400
<v Speaker 12>not specify anything else. It was the weirdest ever.

447
00:27:29.880 --> 00:27:32.079
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, you can always tell those dudes to

448
00:27:32.119 --> 00:27:34.440
<v Speaker 4>come to the open open forums and have a debate.

449
00:27:34.920 --> 00:27:38.400
<v Speaker 4>So Joe, H, I think it's welcome to come to

450
00:27:38.440 --> 00:27:39.400
<v Speaker 4>b Andrew, what's up?

451
00:27:52.559 --> 00:28:25.359
<v Speaker 13>I mean, Andrew mute? Andrew unmute if you want to talk?

452
00:28:26.799 --> 00:28:31.880
<v Speaker 3>No, what go ahead? Are there? Did you turn your

453
00:28:31.920 --> 00:28:34.119
<v Speaker 3>mind tongue to God? And like? What do people not

454
00:28:34.559 --> 00:28:38.119
<v Speaker 3>ever use spaces? Like? Is my space the first space

455
00:28:38.160 --> 00:28:48.759
<v Speaker 3>for every single person? D D? What's up? Matter? Yeah?

456
00:28:48.920 --> 00:28:54.640
<v Speaker 14>Hey, how you doing? Been a minute? Have you seen this?

457
00:28:56.319 --> 00:29:01.880
<v Speaker 14>Uh recent article? Candice Owens is reposts it, Jack Posto

458
00:29:02.000 --> 00:29:06.960
<v Speaker 14>is reposting. It's like Reverend Johnny Moore and our good

459
00:29:07.000 --> 00:29:07.720
<v Speaker 14>old guy JP.

460
00:29:11.519 --> 00:29:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Uh, I haven't seen this article. Who who is this reverend?

461
00:29:14.359 --> 00:29:14.759
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

462
00:29:15.079 --> 00:29:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Is this the guy that was the pedo?

463
00:29:18.640 --> 00:29:20.920
<v Speaker 14>Uh No, I'm not I'm not sure. But it's just

464
00:29:21.039 --> 00:29:26.200
<v Speaker 14>this whole concept of the I guess the uptick of

465
00:29:26.279 --> 00:29:30.039
<v Speaker 14>Christ is king. Christ is king being co opted by

466
00:29:30.200 --> 00:29:32.839
<v Speaker 14>some I guess ethno nationalist types.

467
00:29:36.920 --> 00:29:39.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't doubt that the establishment has fed and

468
00:29:39.920 --> 00:29:42.319
<v Speaker 3>people trying to do that. But I've not seen this

469
00:29:42.440 --> 00:29:45.079
<v Speaker 3>article and I'm not sure. So you said with our

470
00:29:45.119 --> 00:29:47.079
<v Speaker 3>buddy who JB P like Jordan Peters.

471
00:29:47.160 --> 00:29:47.559
<v Speaker 15>Yeah? Yeah.

472
00:29:47.960 --> 00:29:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Jordan Peterson COT.

473
00:29:50.000 --> 00:29:57.440
<v Speaker 3>And Jordan Peter Peterson co authored an article about the

474
00:29:57.480 --> 00:30:00.079
<v Speaker 3>co opting of Christ the King dealing with at no

475
00:30:00.240 --> 00:30:01.920
<v Speaker 3>nationalists is ever you're saying.

476
00:30:02.079 --> 00:30:05.200
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, so if you see Jack Poso posted about it,

477
00:30:07.119 --> 00:30:11.839
<v Speaker 14>Reverend Johnny Moore and Jordan B. Peterson talking about how

478
00:30:11.920 --> 00:30:18.319
<v Speaker 14>anti Semitic movements have hijacked the Christis King and uh,

479
00:30:19.319 --> 00:30:23.400
<v Speaker 14>well they're basically. But I wanted to talk about it

480
00:30:23.440 --> 00:30:27.680
<v Speaker 14>because well, I mean, I think that there's something to it,

481
00:30:28.720 --> 00:30:31.519
<v Speaker 14>and I've I've been struggling.

482
00:30:31.039 --> 00:30:32.000
<v Speaker 5>With that myself.

483
00:30:32.440 --> 00:30:35.599
<v Speaker 14>A lot of the guys, even in the Orthodox space,

484
00:30:35.680 --> 00:30:39.920
<v Speaker 14>like that Orthodox Luigi like sometimes he's towing that line,

485
00:30:40.640 --> 00:30:41.319
<v Speaker 14>you know, And.

486
00:30:44.920 --> 00:30:48.079
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean I've I've spoken on this topic like

487
00:30:48.200 --> 00:30:48.960
<v Speaker 4>multiple times.

488
00:30:49.000 --> 00:30:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I did.

489
00:30:49.240 --> 00:30:51.440
<v Speaker 4>I devoted like the entire week two weeks ago to

490
00:30:51.480 --> 00:30:54.759
<v Speaker 4>this topic. And I don't follow all the Luigi's post

491
00:30:54.799 --> 00:30:56.319
<v Speaker 4>so I don't know everything that he said, but I

492
00:30:56.359 --> 00:30:59.440
<v Speaker 4>know that, you know, Luigi was really into Fuentos for

493
00:30:59.480 --> 00:31:03.319
<v Speaker 4>a while and then they fell a scance on one another,

494
00:31:03.480 --> 00:31:06.759
<v Speaker 4>and he was dealing with Groyper's for a long time.

495
00:31:07.559 --> 00:31:10.680
<v Speaker 4>So now I don't know about Fuentes himself, but I

496
00:31:10.720 --> 00:31:12.759
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't have I would imagine that there's quite a few,

497
00:31:13.799 --> 00:31:17.519
<v Speaker 4>you know, provocateur fed type people absolutely involved in trying

498
00:31:17.559 --> 00:31:22.839
<v Speaker 4>to get individuals involved in and stirring up some kind

499
00:31:22.920 --> 00:31:24.720
<v Speaker 4>of movement like that.

500
00:31:24.720 --> 00:31:25.200
<v Speaker 3>That's fake.

501
00:31:25.559 --> 00:31:28.160
<v Speaker 4>In fact, I mentioned that to I hypocrite last night.

502
00:31:28.599 --> 00:31:30.599
<v Speaker 4>A lot of those people, I think try to link

503
00:31:32.119 --> 00:31:35.640
<v Speaker 4>it to Islam, like this is the right wing dudes

504
00:31:35.680 --> 00:31:37.680
<v Speaker 4>that want to link up with Islam. It's like, well, well,

505
00:31:38.720 --> 00:31:41.640
<v Speaker 4>like all, well to see their anti Jew, anti Zionis

506
00:31:41.720 --> 00:31:45.279
<v Speaker 4>so they're all based when Islam is literally the rabbi say,

507
00:31:45.359 --> 00:31:47.079
<v Speaker 4>Islam is the broom of Israel.

508
00:31:47.680 --> 00:31:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Destroy the Just a lot.

509
00:31:49.240 --> 00:31:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Of h Man glorification.

510
00:31:51.079 --> 00:31:54.279
<v Speaker 14>I mean, I'm pretty sure there's a quote by mustache

511
00:31:54.279 --> 00:31:57.559
<v Speaker 14>Man himself about oh, we would have preferred the Mohammedan religion.

512
00:31:58.279 --> 00:31:59.599
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's a lot of.

513
00:31:59.519 --> 00:32:04.559
<v Speaker 14>This, yes, he says, like sissification of of Christendom and

514
00:32:04.559 --> 00:32:05.559
<v Speaker 14>and all this kind of stuff.

515
00:32:05.559 --> 00:32:11.079
<v Speaker 4>And however, it's also true that the people on the

516
00:32:11.160 --> 00:32:14.720
<v Speaker 4>right and some of those spears obviously will not talk

517
00:32:14.759 --> 00:32:21.160
<v Speaker 4>about apac u Zionism and the rabbinical traditions and their methodology.

518
00:32:21.200 --> 00:32:21.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's true.

519
00:32:21.759 --> 00:32:28.200
<v Speaker 14>I'm no judas are like you know, if if you

520
00:32:28.440 --> 00:32:30.960
<v Speaker 14>if you make a nuanced critique of all of a sudden,

521
00:32:31.000 --> 00:32:32.039
<v Speaker 14>you're a massade agent.

522
00:32:32.680 --> 00:32:34.920
<v Speaker 5>You know, uh, and and it's.

523
00:32:34.759 --> 00:32:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Almost like I've been called that, dude. I've been called

524
00:32:39.039 --> 00:32:42.680
<v Speaker 4>that for like years because I'm on the Alex Jones Show.

525
00:32:43.559 --> 00:32:46.119
<v Speaker 4>And then when when I devote an entire week and

526
00:32:46.160 --> 00:32:52.039
<v Speaker 4>a half actually to rebindic Judaism, dispensationalism, Zionism, then suddenly, oh,

527
00:32:52.079 --> 00:32:53.160
<v Speaker 4>you're an anti Semitic.

528
00:32:53.559 --> 00:32:55.839
<v Speaker 3>You know. It's like it doesn't matter what you talk about.

529
00:32:55.920 --> 00:32:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Dealers do this.

530
00:32:56.799 --> 00:32:59.880
<v Speaker 14>But unfortunately, I think there's this guy that's kind of

531
00:32:59.880 --> 00:33:02.599
<v Speaker 14>a attached at the hip to oh and Shroyer. I

532
00:33:02.640 --> 00:33:06.759
<v Speaker 14>don't I don't think Schroyer's necessarily signed is John Hancock

533
00:33:06.839 --> 00:33:10.119
<v Speaker 14>to it, but he's kind of floating around this guy

534
00:33:10.160 --> 00:33:13.000
<v Speaker 14>who definitely he's got me on the block list on

535
00:33:13.079 --> 00:33:16.440
<v Speaker 14>like three different accounts, calling me massad and you know,

536
00:33:16.559 --> 00:33:18.079
<v Speaker 14>jew lover and this, that and the third.

537
00:33:18.640 --> 00:33:22.200
<v Speaker 5>But it's just frustrating.

538
00:33:22.240 --> 00:33:24.400
<v Speaker 14>I guess I wanted to come on and see what

539
00:33:24.400 --> 00:33:26.240
<v Speaker 14>what your position was on it is.

540
00:33:26.880 --> 00:33:28.480
<v Speaker 5>I do think in a big way it is fake

541
00:33:28.519 --> 00:33:29.920
<v Speaker 5>and gay, as I say, but.

542
00:33:32.599 --> 00:33:35.599
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's like the only answer to these positions I

543
00:33:35.599 --> 00:33:39.000
<v Speaker 4>think is Christ in the in the traditional Orthodox sense,

544
00:33:39.119 --> 00:33:42.079
<v Speaker 4>because you know, you're not going to have peace between

545
00:33:42.279 --> 00:33:45.039
<v Speaker 4>Arab and jew and all this kind of stuff until

546
00:33:45.279 --> 00:33:48.440
<v Speaker 4>there's a recognition of the Messiah. So uh, you know,

547
00:33:48.519 --> 00:33:50.599
<v Speaker 4>but in the in the meantime, so that's not going

548
00:33:50.680 --> 00:33:52.880
<v Speaker 4>to happen right away most likely.

549
00:33:53.359 --> 00:33:56.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's not. Really. It's like when people say, well,

550
00:33:56.799 --> 00:33:58.720
<v Speaker 3>who's better a Muslim.

551
00:33:58.279 --> 00:34:00.880
<v Speaker 4>A Calvinist or a papist, and it's like, well, I

552
00:34:00.920 --> 00:34:04.200
<v Speaker 4>mean they're all kind of problematics. It's like it's hard

553
00:34:04.240 --> 00:34:07.400
<v Speaker 4>to it's like hard to pick amongst the wrong positions sometimes.

554
00:34:07.480 --> 00:34:10.880
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, well, anyway, I think that uh, whoever that that

555
00:34:10.920 --> 00:34:13.079
<v Speaker 14>good old Southern molasses boy was that you're trying to

556
00:34:13.079 --> 00:34:13.480
<v Speaker 14>get on here.

557
00:34:13.519 --> 00:34:15.119
<v Speaker 5>I think he's kind of racist for not wanting to

558
00:34:15.159 --> 00:34:16.039
<v Speaker 5>debate green people.

559
00:34:16.719 --> 00:34:20.400
<v Speaker 3>But that's a good way. But like, yeah, why does

560
00:34:20.519 --> 00:34:24.119
<v Speaker 3>James White get to be racist against green people like myself?

561
00:34:25.079 --> 00:34:27.480
<v Speaker 3>You know clearly clearly in that.

562
00:34:27.360 --> 00:34:30.719
<v Speaker 4>Picture I'm intending to be taken seriously because I'm pictured

563
00:34:30.760 --> 00:34:33.239
<v Speaker 4>with mac and me, And if James White doesn't know

564
00:34:33.280 --> 00:34:36.880
<v Speaker 4>what Macamy is, then that's already uh self refuting for

565
00:34:37.000 --> 00:34:38.719
<v Speaker 4>James White, basically, his career is over.

566
00:34:39.440 --> 00:34:45.559
<v Speaker 3>Dan, what's up, good evening?

567
00:34:45.639 --> 00:34:46.039
<v Speaker 16>Can I be?

568
00:34:46.079 --> 00:34:48.880
<v Speaker 3>He say?

569
00:34:48.920 --> 00:34:49.079
<v Speaker 9>What?

570
00:34:49.559 --> 00:34:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Can you hear me? You can hear me, I can

571
00:34:57.480 --> 00:34:57.719
<v Speaker 3>hear you.

572
00:34:58.800 --> 00:35:06.000
<v Speaker 16>Okay, So I have questions about Calvinism, right, So my

573
00:35:06.480 --> 00:35:11.320
<v Speaker 16>first question, Okay, my first question is on your belief

574
00:35:11.360 --> 00:35:17.320
<v Speaker 16>over God decline all actions, right, so they believe that,

575
00:35:17.800 --> 00:35:20.480
<v Speaker 16>or I'm not very shonable. I know that some people

576
00:35:20.519 --> 00:35:25.920
<v Speaker 16>believe that God decrease all actions and that includes scein.

577
00:35:26.559 --> 00:35:31.199
<v Speaker 16>But at the same time they they hold that man

578
00:35:31.360 --> 00:35:35.000
<v Speaker 16>is responsible for sin. So my first question is how

579
00:35:35.039 --> 00:35:36.639
<v Speaker 16>how how does that work?

580
00:35:37.519 --> 00:35:37.679
<v Speaker 5>Right?

581
00:35:38.239 --> 00:35:39.480
<v Speaker 8>Do you understand what I mean?

582
00:35:39.920 --> 00:35:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that's correct.

583
00:35:41.159 --> 00:35:45.039
<v Speaker 4>Calvin Is, for the most part, believe that that all

584
00:35:45.079 --> 00:35:49.719
<v Speaker 4>evil and sin are absolutely under the divine decree. Absolutely,

585
00:35:49.760 --> 00:35:53.039
<v Speaker 4>so that's really not even in question in Calvinism. Calvinists

586
00:35:53.039 --> 00:35:56.679
<v Speaker 4>give lip service to secondary causes and human free will

587
00:35:56.840 --> 00:36:02.639
<v Speaker 4>and choice, but even even the secondary causes are still

588
00:36:02.960 --> 00:36:05.800
<v Speaker 4>caused by the first cause, the divine cause.

589
00:36:05.880 --> 00:36:08.800
<v Speaker 3>So really it's just kind of lip service. And that's

590
00:36:08.840 --> 00:36:10.320
<v Speaker 3>why historically.

591
00:36:10.320 --> 00:36:14.679
<v Speaker 4>Some Calvinists, amongst the Puritans Jonathan Edwards for example, they

592
00:36:14.719 --> 00:36:18.159
<v Speaker 4>actually end up being occasionalists, just like the Sunni Muslims.

593
00:36:18.719 --> 00:36:56.599
<v Speaker 3>So let's see Andrew try again at doak pay.

594
00:37:02.920 --> 00:37:07.960
<v Speaker 17>Hi jak Amy. Yes, Sir Hi, so I was going

595
00:37:08.000 --> 00:37:10.039
<v Speaker 17>through your video the other day. I'm Roman Catholic, by

596
00:37:10.039 --> 00:37:13.400
<v Speaker 17>the way, and you mentioned in your video about icons,

597
00:37:14.599 --> 00:37:18.320
<v Speaker 17>talking about how the Seventh Ecumenical Council actually distributes the

598
00:37:18.440 --> 00:37:23.719
<v Speaker 17>Roman Catholic position, and you basically said that in the

599
00:37:23.800 --> 00:37:27.039
<v Speaker 17>Seventh Council they gave sulf like limitations and criteria for

600
00:37:27.360 --> 00:37:31.079
<v Speaker 17>icons in within church services and all that.

601
00:37:32.199 --> 00:37:32.679
<v Speaker 3>I was looking.

602
00:37:33.159 --> 00:37:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sorry, I just addressed that it's so in the

603
00:37:36.440 --> 00:37:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox view the Seventh that Caminical councils, and we don't

604
00:37:39.320 --> 00:37:41.840
<v Speaker 4>view it like the Roman Catholics, that there's this like

605
00:37:41.920 --> 00:37:45.199
<v Speaker 4>strict legalistic thing that, oh, that's only the Seventh. That

606
00:37:45.239 --> 00:37:50.239
<v Speaker 4>chemical Council, the Council of eight forty three is what

607
00:37:50.320 --> 00:37:52.760
<v Speaker 4>we celebrate in the Orthodox Church as the victory of

608
00:37:52.920 --> 00:37:56.239
<v Speaker 4>Orthodoxy is called triumph of Orthodoxy. So yeah, way that

609
00:37:56.559 --> 00:38:00.519
<v Speaker 4>council puts out the Sonotacon, which is from A three,

610
00:38:00.679 --> 00:38:04.079
<v Speaker 4>which is about the Seventh Ecumenical Council. And by the way,

611
00:38:04.079 --> 00:38:06.400
<v Speaker 4>the Seventh that Gundom Council does have multiple canons that

612
00:38:06.440 --> 00:38:08.960
<v Speaker 4>deal with icons. For example, says not to make icons

613
00:38:08.960 --> 00:38:11.719
<v Speaker 4>of God the Father. So that's one example that easily

614
00:38:11.840 --> 00:38:15.800
<v Speaker 4>right there wipes out a whole bunch of Roman Catholic iconography,

615
00:38:15.800 --> 00:38:18.039
<v Speaker 4>because in principle you're not supposed to do that.

616
00:38:18.159 --> 00:38:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, I'm not saying that all.

617
00:38:21.239 --> 00:38:26.159
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox churches obey this, because sometimes Worthdox churches are not canonical,

618
00:38:26.480 --> 00:38:28.599
<v Speaker 4>but I was pointing out that the principles that you

619
00:38:28.679 --> 00:38:31.960
<v Speaker 4>see even in the canons, even before getting to the

620
00:38:32.000 --> 00:38:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Sonoticon and other documents, the principles already from the outset

621
00:38:36.559 --> 00:38:40.440
<v Speaker 4>exclude things like the extreme accesses that you see all

622
00:38:40.440 --> 00:38:41.440
<v Speaker 4>throughout the Roman cllegtory.

623
00:38:41.519 --> 00:38:43.719
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, so that's what as a thing I couldn't really like.

624
00:38:43.960 --> 00:38:45.360
<v Speaker 17>So I saw that. I saw them like in two

625
00:38:45.440 --> 00:38:48.800
<v Speaker 17>candids that talked about you can s how to make

626
00:38:48.840 --> 00:38:52.880
<v Speaker 17>the icons bind sea, it's explicitly how to what is

627
00:38:52.880 --> 00:38:55.800
<v Speaker 17>including in acos always excluded from icons except what obviously

628
00:38:56.360 --> 00:38:57.360
<v Speaker 17>Godfather being depicted.

629
00:38:57.519 --> 00:39:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Now there's a canon about the God the Father, and

630
00:39:00.800 --> 00:39:04.039
<v Speaker 4>it's actually I think even earlier if I recall the

631
00:39:04.119 --> 00:39:06.320
<v Speaker 4>exclusion of God the Father is actually in Trollo, and

632
00:39:06.320 --> 00:39:08.559
<v Speaker 4>then it's restate all the Trello canons, by the way,

633
00:39:08.559 --> 00:39:10.400
<v Speaker 4>are affirmed by and I see it too, by the way,

634
00:39:10.440 --> 00:39:12.360
<v Speaker 4>so there's it's not just the canons, and I see

635
00:39:12.400 --> 00:39:14.880
<v Speaker 4>it two. I see you two, also affirms Trollo.

636
00:39:15.480 --> 00:39:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

637
00:39:15.920 --> 00:39:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Any and then but if I recall even if you

638
00:39:18.480 --> 00:39:20.679
<v Speaker 4>go to New Advent, if you do control F and

639
00:39:20.719 --> 00:39:23.519
<v Speaker 4>you search icon on the canons under the Seventh Council,

640
00:39:24.119 --> 00:39:26.639
<v Speaker 4>there's I'm going from memory here, there's multiple canons to

641
00:39:26.719 --> 00:39:29.679
<v Speaker 4>talk about the icons, the images and all this kind

642
00:39:29.679 --> 00:39:33.960
<v Speaker 4>of stuff. They do not lay out artistic strictures per se.

643
00:39:34.159 --> 00:39:37.880
<v Speaker 4>That comes later on in the development of what happens

644
00:39:37.880 --> 00:39:39.800
<v Speaker 4>in terms of contrasting the East with the West.

645
00:39:39.880 --> 00:39:45.280
<v Speaker 17>Oh okay, so that so layout you said that came later.

646
00:39:46.039 --> 00:39:47.159
<v Speaker 17>What's like time period?

647
00:39:47.280 --> 00:39:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Was that? Was that like after.

648
00:39:50.679 --> 00:39:53.039
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you read this, look up the sonaticon and

649
00:39:53.039 --> 00:39:55.320
<v Speaker 4>the sonatakon, the full one, like not an abridged one,

650
00:39:55.360 --> 00:39:57.280
<v Speaker 4>like the full one from that or what's believed to

651
00:39:57.320 --> 00:40:00.119
<v Speaker 4>be from that time is pretty lengthy and it all

652
00:40:00.119 --> 00:40:01.840
<v Speaker 4>so you know, it goes into some of.

653
00:40:01.760 --> 00:40:03.239
<v Speaker 9>The operating Okay, cool, thanks man.

654
00:40:06.000 --> 00:40:07.039
<v Speaker 3>Yeah no, that's great.

655
00:40:07.079 --> 00:40:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Questions I put in the in the comments of that

656
00:40:10.119 --> 00:40:16.159
<v Speaker 4>video that I'm referring to eight forty three, and that's

657
00:40:16.159 --> 00:40:27.239
<v Speaker 4>anauticon Andrew, you want to try again, yes, sir.

658
00:40:29.119 --> 00:40:30.920
<v Speaker 18>Hey, just let you know this actually is my first

659
00:40:30.920 --> 00:40:35.239
<v Speaker 18>time speaking on a Twitter space. Sor right, I know, yeah,

660
00:40:35.239 --> 00:40:38.119
<v Speaker 18>I know you were. Hey, Look, so I converted to

661
00:40:38.280 --> 00:40:44.039
<v Speaker 18>Catholicism in twenty sixteen. I was raised Calvinist Presbyterian. I

662
00:40:44.079 --> 00:40:46.119
<v Speaker 18>was just starting to read a lot of church history

663
00:40:46.400 --> 00:40:50.480
<v Speaker 18>and in some Catholic apologetics that it made sense.

664
00:40:52.199 --> 00:40:53.320
<v Speaker 8>And then, you know, with the.

665
00:40:53.400 --> 00:40:57.760
<v Speaker 18>Post Vatican two Catholic Church, I was having some theological issues.

666
00:40:58.880 --> 00:41:00.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, man, you're going through what I went through in

667
00:41:00.599 --> 00:41:01.239
<v Speaker 3>the two thousands.

668
00:41:01.280 --> 00:41:03.639
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, and uh, then you know, so then I I've

669
00:41:03.719 --> 00:41:08.599
<v Speaker 18>drifted towards traditionalism, and then and then you know, I've

670
00:41:08.599 --> 00:41:11.559
<v Speaker 18>been studying for for a few years, and and then

671
00:41:11.599 --> 00:41:14.400
<v Speaker 18>I'm having other issues. And so lately, you know, I've

672
00:41:14.440 --> 00:41:19.880
<v Speaker 18>been listening to Father Josiah Trinham and in reading some

673
00:41:20.000 --> 00:41:23.400
<v Speaker 18>Orthodox stuff, and there's a lot of stuff that's making

674
00:41:23.480 --> 00:41:26.320
<v Speaker 18>sense to me. But this may seem like a simple question,

675
00:41:26.440 --> 00:41:28.880
<v Speaker 18>but I've been reading this book, The Rise and Fall

676
00:41:28.920 --> 00:41:35.320
<v Speaker 18>of the Papacy. It's uh talking and the guy's talking

677
00:41:35.320 --> 00:41:40.480
<v Speaker 18>about how the ancient church. You know, he's talking about

678
00:41:40.519 --> 00:41:47.519
<v Speaker 18>a lot about the pentarchy, the five patriarchs, and uh,

679
00:41:47.559 --> 00:41:51.880
<v Speaker 18>with the schism, here's my question. With the schism between

680
00:41:52.039 --> 00:41:56.440
<v Speaker 18>you know, the patriarch of the West and the other patriarchs.

681
00:41:56.800 --> 00:41:57.639
<v Speaker 19>How does.

682
00:42:00.079 --> 00:42:02.079
<v Speaker 18>How do they come how does the Orthodox Church now

683
00:42:02.119 --> 00:42:02.719
<v Speaker 18>come to like.

684
00:42:02.679 --> 00:42:07.960
<v Speaker 19>A consensus base, uh like decision like it do they

685
00:42:08.039 --> 00:42:11.599
<v Speaker 19>just like because Rome is in schism just basically ignore

686
00:42:11.639 --> 00:42:15.440
<v Speaker 19>them like no, or like don't.

687
00:42:16.199 --> 00:42:16.679
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah.

688
00:42:16.719 --> 00:42:20.519
<v Speaker 4>So the Orthodox view does not believe that Rome is

689
00:42:20.559 --> 00:42:22.880
<v Speaker 4>still part of the church. That's how a Vatican two

690
00:42:22.960 --> 00:42:24.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of mindset where when they look at us, they

691
00:42:25.039 --> 00:42:28.119
<v Speaker 4>see us as quote the eastern lung of the Church.

692
00:42:28.199 --> 00:42:29.480
<v Speaker 3>They have this accumenist view.

693
00:42:29.960 --> 00:42:34.519
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox ecclesiology does not include heretics and schismatics as amongst

694
00:42:34.519 --> 00:42:36.519
<v Speaker 4>the body of Christ. So no, we do not believe

695
00:42:36.519 --> 00:42:40.800
<v Speaker 4>that the papacy continued to be somehow you know, part

696
00:42:40.840 --> 00:42:42.960
<v Speaker 4>of the church or halfway in the church or one

697
00:42:43.039 --> 00:42:45.559
<v Speaker 4>third of the church. No, they left the church. They're

698
00:42:45.559 --> 00:42:47.840
<v Speaker 4>not in the church. That's why they have to convert

699
00:42:47.920 --> 00:42:52.280
<v Speaker 4>to the church. And that's why every Orthodox church traditionally, classically,

700
00:42:52.360 --> 00:42:56.039
<v Speaker 4>historically has made people go through a profession of the.

701
00:42:55.960 --> 00:42:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Abjuration of heresies.

702
00:42:57.320 --> 00:42:59.400
<v Speaker 4>So when you join the Orthodox Church, are supposed to

703
00:43:00.000 --> 00:43:05.199
<v Speaker 4>I sure your previous heresies and mistakes, whether Protestant Calvinists Lutheran.

704
00:43:04.880 --> 00:43:05.760
<v Speaker 3>Or Roman Catholic.

705
00:43:06.119 --> 00:43:07.920
<v Speaker 4>So that shows you right there that I mean, you

706
00:43:07.920 --> 00:43:10.280
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't be abjuring your previous heresies if they thought it

707
00:43:10.320 --> 00:43:10.679
<v Speaker 4>was the church.

708
00:43:10.760 --> 00:43:16.000
<v Speaker 18>Yeah. And another question, do you have any like historical

709
00:43:16.079 --> 00:43:20.400
<v Speaker 18>books that would the like in depth stuff recommendations like

710
00:43:20.639 --> 00:43:22.119
<v Speaker 18>on orthodoxy.

711
00:43:22.480 --> 00:43:22.760
<v Speaker 3>In like.

712
00:43:24.280 --> 00:43:27.639
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, yeah, like there's a bunch, But if

713
00:43:27.679 --> 00:43:29.360
<v Speaker 4>you go to my channel when it comes to the

714
00:43:29.440 --> 00:43:31.800
<v Speaker 4>questions of like Vatican two and the history of the

715
00:43:31.800 --> 00:43:35.280
<v Speaker 4>papacy and those problems. Uh, I mean, I dare say

716
00:43:35.320 --> 00:43:38.119
<v Speaker 4>that I've gone deeper into that topic and more intently

717
00:43:38.119 --> 00:43:41.480
<v Speaker 4>into that topic than the author that you're speaking.

718
00:43:41.119 --> 00:43:42.360
<v Speaker 3>Of, or Father Josiah.

719
00:43:42.519 --> 00:43:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Not to knock those guys, but I spent many years

720
00:43:45.920 --> 00:43:49.159
<v Speaker 4>in the world of Roman Catholicism and in those documents,

721
00:43:49.199 --> 00:43:51.760
<v Speaker 4>and I know those documents better than those guys. I

722
00:43:51.800 --> 00:43:54.440
<v Speaker 4>know those documents better than pretty much all the Roman Catholics.

723
00:43:55.039 --> 00:43:58.159
<v Speaker 4>So I could tell you, like you know where it'll

724
00:43:58.199 --> 00:43:59.920
<v Speaker 4>go in Denzinger, I can tell you where to go

725
00:44:00.079 --> 00:44:02.719
<v Speaker 4>and the you know, Roman Catholic dogmatic councils, like I

726
00:44:02.719 --> 00:44:05.320
<v Speaker 4>know all that stuff really well. So find my old

727
00:44:05.360 --> 00:44:09.320
<v Speaker 4>videos about you know, Romancantholisism Vatican.

728
00:44:09.559 --> 00:44:10.519
<v Speaker 3>You know that kind of stuff.

729
00:44:10.599 --> 00:44:13.519
<v Speaker 4>Vatican One contradictions, all that stuff is pretty solid, I

730
00:44:13.519 --> 00:44:17.519
<v Speaker 4>would say from my my channel. I mean, if you're

731
00:44:17.559 --> 00:44:21.280
<v Speaker 4>looking for, you know, Orthodox Church history in this regard,

732
00:44:21.320 --> 00:44:24.239
<v Speaker 4>I would say get the Papa Doccus Mayan North book.

733
00:44:25.880 --> 00:44:27.320
<v Speaker 3>The Papacy in the Middle Ages.

734
00:44:27.360 --> 00:44:29.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that book is really good because it's about

735
00:44:30.119 --> 00:44:33.559
<v Speaker 4>the period when the East and the West split, and

736
00:44:33.639 --> 00:44:38.119
<v Speaker 4>you'll see very clearly that from one thousand to fourteen

737
00:44:38.199 --> 00:44:43.360
<v Speaker 4>hundred the Roman Church clearly went in a different direction

738
00:44:43.599 --> 00:44:46.639
<v Speaker 4>than the pre existing United Church.

739
00:44:47.559 --> 00:44:51.159
<v Speaker 18>Hey, thank you so much, and I will check out

740
00:44:51.159 --> 00:44:51.559
<v Speaker 18>your video.

741
00:44:51.679 --> 00:44:52.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean there's a lot.

742
00:44:52.599 --> 00:44:54.400
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot, but there's also you know, you could

743
00:44:54.440 --> 00:44:57.239
<v Speaker 4>get another You could get Michael Welton's book Two Paths

744
00:44:57.280 --> 00:45:03.840
<v Speaker 4>as kind of a readable, more introductory book. Catholic Father

745
00:45:04.079 --> 00:45:04.760
<v Speaker 4>crab people.

746
00:45:13.400 --> 00:45:15.320
<v Speaker 10>Hey, there as a Catholic.

747
00:45:16.039 --> 00:45:20.480
<v Speaker 20>The skive them obviously being nearly a thousand years ago,

748
00:45:21.360 --> 00:45:23.599
<v Speaker 20>seems like a lot of one side.

749
00:45:23.320 --> 00:45:25.440
<v Speaker 10>Fucked up, the other side fucked up. And then did

750
00:45:25.440 --> 00:45:29.320
<v Speaker 10>the spider man mean, uh, you're out, No, you're out.

751
00:45:29.480 --> 00:45:30.239
<v Speaker 10>But I'm the Church.

752
00:45:30.280 --> 00:45:31.039
<v Speaker 3>No, you're the Church.

753
00:45:33.079 --> 00:45:42.079
<v Speaker 20>At what point is or the the disunified Orthodoxy and

754
00:45:42.199 --> 00:45:45.159
<v Speaker 20>that claim to be the true Church and not have

755
00:45:45.239 --> 00:45:50.079
<v Speaker 20>broken apart part of the true Church. At what point

756
00:45:50.159 --> 00:45:53.920
<v Speaker 20>is that fruitful and what part of that is just pride?

757
00:45:54.559 --> 00:45:56.119
<v Speaker 20>And would it not be beneficial?

758
00:46:00.079 --> 00:46:03.079
<v Speaker 4>Your question assumes that the Roman Catholic Church is unified,

759
00:46:03.119 --> 00:46:05.480
<v Speaker 4>and I can make multiple arguments to demonstrate that it's

760
00:46:05.519 --> 00:46:09.039
<v Speaker 4>not unified. And to accuse the Orthodox Church of pride

761
00:46:09.119 --> 00:46:13.400
<v Speaker 4>is ignoring the papal admissions at the Alexandria Synod and

762
00:46:13.440 --> 00:46:15.880
<v Speaker 4>the t eighty Synod which admit that the Roman Church

763
00:46:15.960 --> 00:46:18.800
<v Speaker 4>engage in a lot of pride. So, uh, it's a

764
00:46:18.880 --> 00:46:20.800
<v Speaker 4>question of which one's right, which one's wrong.

765
00:46:20.880 --> 00:46:23.800
<v Speaker 3>It's not a question of you know.

766
00:46:24.760 --> 00:46:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look at the centuries after the Schism, which

767
00:46:28.159 --> 00:46:32.039
<v Speaker 4>church evolved away from the canonical structure of the Church

768
00:46:32.079 --> 00:46:35.000
<v Speaker 4>of the first thousand years.

769
00:46:36.320 --> 00:46:39.440
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I haven't studied this forever.

770
00:46:39.639 --> 00:46:42.239
<v Speaker 20>So I need you to speak at least in a

771
00:46:42.239 --> 00:46:45.519
<v Speaker 20>way that can be interacted with, you know.

772
00:46:45.960 --> 00:46:48.119
<v Speaker 4>And so you're here to debate the topic and you're

773
00:46:48.119 --> 00:46:50.440
<v Speaker 4>accusing us of pride, but you're not familiar with the

774
00:46:50.480 --> 00:46:51.519
<v Speaker 4>history that you want to debate.

775
00:46:51.639 --> 00:46:57.000
<v Speaker 20>I'm not I'm not saying that Orthodoxy is incorrect where

776
00:46:57.039 --> 00:46:59.079
<v Speaker 20>you're claiming that Catholicism you.

777
00:46:59.119 --> 00:47:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Just said that it was an issue have brought you

778
00:47:00.880 --> 00:47:03.320
<v Speaker 4>said centuries of pride without unity.

779
00:47:03.480 --> 00:47:07.960
<v Speaker 20>So does the Orthodox claim that Catholics are not Christian.

780
00:47:10.079 --> 00:47:13.079
<v Speaker 4>Where the traditional Orthodox position is that the papacy is

781
00:47:13.159 --> 00:47:16.719
<v Speaker 4>heterodox for about thirty different reasons.

782
00:47:16.880 --> 00:47:21.000
<v Speaker 20>Okay, so the baptism in a Catholic baptism is not

783
00:47:21.199 --> 00:47:25.440
<v Speaker 20>valid and only an Orthodox baptism is valid, saying that

784
00:47:25.559 --> 00:47:33.199
<v Speaker 20>everybody else is wrong when the schism went tit for tat.

785
00:47:33.960 --> 00:47:35.719
<v Speaker 3>This is just an appeal to This is just an appeal.

786
00:47:35.840 --> 00:47:37.280
<v Speaker 3>This is just an appeal to emotion.

787
00:47:37.519 --> 00:47:40.440
<v Speaker 4>And the appeal is already assuming that the Catholic position

788
00:47:40.480 --> 00:47:43.880
<v Speaker 4>is correct on baptism. So you've not yet demonstrated that

789
00:47:43.960 --> 00:47:47.360
<v Speaker 4>the Catholic ex operary operators position is correct. So your

790
00:47:47.400 --> 00:47:49.719
<v Speaker 4>appeal to that and appeal to emotion doesn't work.

791
00:47:52.239 --> 00:47:56.559
<v Speaker 10>Okay, have fun, have fun?

792
00:47:57.960 --> 00:47:59.559
<v Speaker 4>So do you want to Why don't you want to

793
00:47:59.679 --> 00:48:00.920
<v Speaker 4>talk about the changes?

794
00:48:01.000 --> 00:48:02.960
<v Speaker 3>So he left? So here's what Roman calvics do.

795
00:48:03.039 --> 00:48:04.760
<v Speaker 4>They sit there and they call me names all day,

796
00:48:05.119 --> 00:48:07.440
<v Speaker 4>say I'm the worst person ever. They hop on here

797
00:48:07.480 --> 00:48:09.960
<v Speaker 4>to debate when we get into the topics. They have

798
00:48:10.000 --> 00:48:12.400
<v Speaker 4>no knowledge of the topics. They act like that and

799
00:48:12.400 --> 00:48:26.119
<v Speaker 4>then they run away. Quay loquay, I me.

800
00:48:28.880 --> 00:48:30.920
<v Speaker 8>I have two questions.

801
00:48:31.320 --> 00:48:37.360
<v Speaker 21>So the first one is I attend to a Russian

802
00:48:37.440 --> 00:48:42.400
<v Speaker 21>Orthodox church, like, is are the teachings that they have

803
00:48:42.519 --> 00:48:44.639
<v Speaker 21>in that church the same as if I go to

804
00:48:44.800 --> 00:48:48.039
<v Speaker 21>let's say, a Greek Orthodox church, you know, or other

805
00:48:48.280 --> 00:48:48.599
<v Speaker 21>like that.

806
00:48:48.960 --> 00:48:49.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the same.

807
00:48:49.920 --> 00:48:53.159
<v Speaker 4>It's the same faith because it's it's called the canonical

808
00:48:53.280 --> 00:48:55.239
<v Speaker 4>Orthodox churches, So it's all the ones.

809
00:48:55.000 --> 00:48:55.920
<v Speaker 3>That are in communion.

810
00:48:56.360 --> 00:48:58.440
<v Speaker 4>And even if there's a period when one of the

811
00:48:58.440 --> 00:49:01.480
<v Speaker 4>bishops or the patriarchs are out of communion until there's

812
00:49:01.519 --> 00:49:05.480
<v Speaker 4>an excommunication, you it's still quote the same face, yes.

813
00:49:05.440 --> 00:49:05.960
<v Speaker 5>All right.

814
00:49:06.000 --> 00:49:08.679
<v Speaker 22>And then I thinks, and I have my second question,

815
00:49:08.760 --> 00:49:12.880
<v Speaker 22>which is I went to your website, jasonalysis dot com.

816
00:49:13.000 --> 00:49:17.199
<v Speaker 22>I went to the recommended reading section. Are those books

817
00:49:17.920 --> 00:49:20.119
<v Speaker 22>you know? Do I still have to read them?

818
00:49:20.159 --> 00:49:20.239
<v Speaker 3>Like?

819
00:49:20.320 --> 00:49:23.519
<v Speaker 22>Are they okay for me to read? The ones that

820
00:49:23.559 --> 00:49:26.800
<v Speaker 22>are about Orthodoxy? I'm the apologetics?

821
00:49:28.199 --> 00:49:30.039
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean are they okay? Why wouldn't they

822
00:49:30.039 --> 00:49:30.440
<v Speaker 3>be okay?

823
00:49:30.599 --> 00:49:33.440
<v Speaker 22>No, I'm just asking just out of curiosity, you know,

824
00:49:34.320 --> 00:49:35.079
<v Speaker 22>that's just it.

825
00:49:37.760 --> 00:49:39.679
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I haven't updated that list in a couple

826
00:49:39.719 --> 00:49:42.400
<v Speaker 4>of years, but I don't recall there being anything weird

827
00:49:42.480 --> 00:49:43.320
<v Speaker 4>or questionable on there.

828
00:49:43.400 --> 00:49:45.519
<v Speaker 3>I'll take another look at it. Vic.

829
00:49:49.800 --> 00:49:53.679
<v Speaker 23>Hey, I just had two things I wanted to say,

830
00:49:53.760 --> 00:49:57.880
<v Speaker 23>just a comment and a question. Uh the comments the

831
00:49:58.239 --> 00:50:02.880
<v Speaker 23>article that I mentioned earlier. Uh, just like my opinion

832
00:50:02.920 --> 00:50:05.320
<v Speaker 23>on that is just like it seems to me that

833
00:50:05.400 --> 00:50:10.159
<v Speaker 23>it's a typical like uh, that article. I mean, it's

834
00:50:10.159 --> 00:50:12.800
<v Speaker 23>like a typical like cry bully hall monitor like tone

835
00:50:12.800 --> 00:50:15.320
<v Speaker 23>policing thing where it's like, oh, well, bad people say

836
00:50:15.400 --> 00:50:17.800
<v Speaker 23>Christ is king, So you can't say because if you

837
00:50:17.840 --> 00:50:19.599
<v Speaker 23>say that means you're like one of them, you know,

838
00:50:19.719 --> 00:50:25.159
<v Speaker 23>So I think we should uh just dismiss it in

839
00:50:25.159 --> 00:50:28.599
<v Speaker 23>my in my opinion whatever. And then the question is is, uh,

840
00:50:28.719 --> 00:50:32.639
<v Speaker 23>I'm kind of confused a little bit about Plato's dualism,

841
00:50:32.840 --> 00:50:34.960
<v Speaker 23>and I'm sorry this is if this is a bit

842
00:50:35.000 --> 00:50:37.559
<v Speaker 23>of a basic question, But it seems to me that

843
00:50:37.679 --> 00:50:43.599
<v Speaker 23>he does have like a binary like oppositions in a

844
00:50:43.679 --> 00:50:46.599
<v Speaker 23>system like like uh oh.

845
00:50:46.599 --> 00:50:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, of course, I mean that's all that's great, reelectic,

846
00:50:48.880 --> 00:50:49.239
<v Speaker 4>but like.

847
00:50:49.639 --> 00:50:52.280
<v Speaker 24>For example, like yeah, between material world and the world

848
00:50:52.280 --> 00:50:54.159
<v Speaker 24>of the forms, but like at the same time, there

849
00:50:54.159 --> 00:50:58.639
<v Speaker 24>also seems to be like uh, a hierarchical dualism, if

850
00:50:58.639 --> 00:51:00.199
<v Speaker 24>that's like the right way to put it, in the

851
00:51:00.239 --> 00:51:03.159
<v Speaker 24>sense that he seems to say that the good is

852
00:51:03.480 --> 00:51:06.840
<v Speaker 24>I'm sorry, evil is the privation of the good, as

853
00:51:06.880 --> 00:51:07.639
<v Speaker 24>we would say.

854
00:51:07.480 --> 00:51:08.440
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not.

855
00:51:08.800 --> 00:51:09.119
<v Speaker 25>I don't know.

856
00:51:09.159 --> 00:51:10.719
<v Speaker 23>It just got me a little bit confused that he

857
00:51:10.880 --> 00:51:13.320
<v Speaker 23>just kind of say, Okay, these things are intentioned and

858
00:51:13.360 --> 00:51:16.920
<v Speaker 23>then these things are kind of like structured hierarchically.

859
00:51:18.639 --> 00:51:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Right, So evil has different senses. Evil can be moral sense, right,

860
00:51:23.320 --> 00:51:25.920
<v Speaker 4>which in Christianity we believe that there's a moral sense

861
00:51:25.960 --> 00:51:30.280
<v Speaker 4>to evil, and that's really what's meant in the Bible

862
00:51:30.400 --> 00:51:32.320
<v Speaker 4>most of the time when it's talking about, you know,

863
00:51:32.440 --> 00:51:36.159
<v Speaker 4>violating the tank commandments and being an evil person. But

864
00:51:36.199 --> 00:51:38.519
<v Speaker 4>the Church Fathers also make use of the platonic and

865
00:51:38.599 --> 00:51:44.719
<v Speaker 4>neoplatonic usage of metaphysically speaking, evils or evil is to

866
00:51:44.760 --> 00:51:47.280
<v Speaker 4>do with privation and non being, and that helps them

867
00:51:47.320 --> 00:51:50.679
<v Speaker 4>explain onto logically that evil doesn't have a substance, it

868
00:51:50.679 --> 00:51:53.440
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have being, and it's not created because everything that.

869
00:51:53.440 --> 00:51:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Exists is created by God and it's called good.

870
00:51:56.960 --> 00:51:59.519
<v Speaker 4>And so everything that exists has some nature that makes

871
00:51:59.559 --> 00:52:02.079
<v Speaker 4>it what it is, and evil has no nature. There's

872
00:52:02.079 --> 00:52:05.440
<v Speaker 4>not a nature to evil, otherwise we would be Manichaeans.

873
00:52:05.639 --> 00:52:11.320
<v Speaker 4>But Platonism does not distinguish really the ontological sense from

874
00:52:11.360 --> 00:52:14.719
<v Speaker 4>the moral sense. So there's a lack I would say

875
00:52:14.800 --> 00:52:17.679
<v Speaker 4>in Plato that, like, you're never going to get an

876
00:52:17.719 --> 00:52:21.280
<v Speaker 4>explanation in Platonism as to why the One split into

877
00:52:21.360 --> 00:52:23.840
<v Speaker 4>the diad and into the triad, and why we have

878
00:52:24.519 --> 00:52:26.920
<v Speaker 4>why we have all this multiplicity that's supposed to get

879
00:52:26.920 --> 00:52:31.639
<v Speaker 4>back to the One. So yeah, Christianity is a moral religion.

880
00:52:32.840 --> 00:52:35.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it has metaphysics, but morals are first, and

881
00:52:35.639 --> 00:52:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Greek philosophy is a metaphysics religion. It's not primarily concerned

882
00:52:40.000 --> 00:52:45.440
<v Speaker 4>with morals and ethics first. Man's chief problem is metaphysical.

883
00:52:45.840 --> 00:52:48.760
<v Speaker 3>But of course that doesn't mean that Plato doesn't have

884
00:52:48.760 --> 00:52:49.239
<v Speaker 3>a place for.

885
00:52:49.320 --> 00:52:52.679
<v Speaker 4>Ethics and virtues. Certainly he does. He thinks they're intimately connected.

886
00:52:52.760 --> 00:52:56.159
<v Speaker 4>But the fact that he thinks that there's a descending

887
00:52:56.239 --> 00:53:01.360
<v Speaker 4>hierarchy of like an ontologically diminished status for the descending

888
00:53:01.400 --> 00:53:04.199
<v Speaker 4>hierarchy of the emanations, like that.

889
00:53:04.119 --> 00:53:06.519
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't mean that they're not. There's not a dialectical.

890
00:53:06.199 --> 00:53:07.599
<v Speaker 26>Okay, thank you, that really clears it up.

891
00:53:09.880 --> 00:53:18.039
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, questions I think that when you get into like Platinus,

892
00:53:19.000 --> 00:53:23.159
<v Speaker 4>he tried to synthesize Plato and Aristotles. He's he's actually

893
00:53:23.199 --> 00:53:25.119
<v Speaker 4>trying to deal with some of those problems in both

894
00:53:25.119 --> 00:53:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Plato and Aristotle.

895
00:53:27.079 --> 00:53:29.079
<v Speaker 3>It's open for me. You guys want to bring up.

896
00:53:30.599 --> 00:53:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Philosophy, topics, Calvinism, Protestantism, Becauseolicism, Islam, Atheism, church history, papacy,

897
00:53:36.440 --> 00:53:42.679
<v Speaker 4>biblical theology. It's all on the table. We got a

898
00:53:42.800 --> 00:53:45.480
<v Speaker 4>nice crowd of two and twenty in here. Of course,

899
00:53:45.480 --> 00:53:47.719
<v Speaker 4>I didn't think James White would actually show up, but

900
00:53:50.559 --> 00:53:57.679
<v Speaker 4>I don't know why he wouldn't if we need, like

901
00:53:58.000 --> 00:54:01.280
<v Speaker 4>why does he need a year to prepare to debate

902
00:54:01.400 --> 00:54:03.800
<v Speaker 4>like can calvin is stuff that he's debated for the

903
00:54:03.880 --> 00:54:08.800
<v Speaker 4>last thirty years. I don't know why, but no, he's

904
00:54:08.800 --> 00:54:10.519
<v Speaker 4>of course he's gonna, you know, so he's too good

905
00:54:10.519 --> 00:54:15.239
<v Speaker 4>to come in here and do that. But whatever, Yeah,

906
00:54:15.239 --> 00:54:16.519
<v Speaker 4>I just don't see why I need to do it

907
00:54:16.599 --> 00:54:19.119
<v Speaker 4>in person, debate a year from now on the topics

908
00:54:19.159 --> 00:54:22.239
<v Speaker 4>that are none of the topics that I suggested to

909
00:54:22.280 --> 00:54:26.519
<v Speaker 4>debate with him for the last six seven years. So

910
00:54:27.480 --> 00:54:32.320
<v Speaker 4>how about he debate the topics that I, uh, or

911
00:54:32.360 --> 00:54:34.159
<v Speaker 4>maybe there were if there's some happy medium.

912
00:54:34.199 --> 00:54:38.960
<v Speaker 3>He debates the Philly OQUI absolutely my suplicity as as

913
00:54:38.960 --> 00:54:42.440
<v Speaker 3>an interestinction and its social contourism like that. But and

914
00:54:42.480 --> 00:54:44.119
<v Speaker 3>then people who say they want to do in.

915
00:54:44.039 --> 00:54:48.119
<v Speaker 4>Person debates, this is a way to postpone and kind

916
00:54:48.199 --> 00:54:50.639
<v Speaker 4>of you know, throw out there a thing that's really

917
00:54:50.639 --> 00:54:53.960
<v Speaker 4>difficult to set up, and they kind of just hope

918
00:54:53.960 --> 00:54:57.000
<v Speaker 4>that it'll get forgotten. And I also think he loaded

919
00:54:57.000 --> 00:55:01.000
<v Speaker 4>his post with a bunch of blame humor, jobs and

920
00:55:01.039 --> 00:55:04.840
<v Speaker 4>insults so that I would reply with jobs and insults,

921
00:55:04.880 --> 00:55:06.440
<v Speaker 4>which is what I did, so that he could go

922
00:55:06.519 --> 00:55:09.239
<v Speaker 4>and say, well, look this person's not serious. He replies

923
00:55:09.280 --> 00:55:11.280
<v Speaker 4>with jobs and insults. It's like, okay, so when you

924
00:55:11.360 --> 00:55:12.960
<v Speaker 4>do it, it's christ like. And that's what all his

925
00:55:13.039 --> 00:55:15.119
<v Speaker 4>gay followers are like, look at.

926
00:55:15.000 --> 00:55:17.639
<v Speaker 3>This guy, he's not serious. Look at those jobs and

927
00:55:17.719 --> 00:55:19.519
<v Speaker 3>insults as like, you mean.

928
00:55:19.440 --> 00:55:23.320
<v Speaker 4>What DA's white said. So it's a weird double standard.

929
00:55:23.360 --> 00:55:25.800
<v Speaker 4>These people are ridiculous.

930
00:55:33.239 --> 00:55:36.159
<v Speaker 27>Yes, sir, So I don't know if you I didn't

931
00:55:36.280 --> 00:55:39.639
<v Speaker 27>comment on your debate stream, But have you heard of

932
00:55:39.679 --> 00:55:41.639
<v Speaker 27>this guy Naven allegedly Ian.

933
00:55:44.519 --> 00:55:45.679
<v Speaker 8>Now allegedly ian.

934
00:55:45.800 --> 00:55:51.519
<v Speaker 27>He's this atheist right now he's so he basically is

935
00:55:51.519 --> 00:55:56.320
<v Speaker 27>trying to argue that God doesn't exist because of slavery

936
00:55:56.400 --> 00:55:59.960
<v Speaker 27>in the Bible, and he basically says that because God

937
00:56:00.239 --> 00:56:03.039
<v Speaker 27>is the perfect lawgiver, therefore it follows that God is

938
00:56:03.719 --> 00:56:06.679
<v Speaker 27>either immoral or does not exist because he sanctioned slavery.

939
00:56:06.800 --> 00:56:08.639
<v Speaker 3>So how would you that?

940
00:56:09.719 --> 00:56:13.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Lewis just made a two hour documentary on that topic.

941
00:56:13.360 --> 00:56:18.559
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, there's nothing that necessitates that a lawgiver can't

942
00:56:19.079 --> 00:56:22.920
<v Speaker 4>give people laws that gradually lead them to an end goal.

943
00:56:23.079 --> 00:56:24.440
<v Speaker 3>So that'd be like.

944
00:56:24.360 --> 00:56:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Saying a parent is a bad parent because they don't

945
00:56:28.360 --> 00:56:31.360
<v Speaker 4>give to their child the laws and the rules that

946
00:56:31.400 --> 00:56:35.000
<v Speaker 4>are appropriate for a teenager or for an adult. So

947
00:56:35.280 --> 00:56:39.920
<v Speaker 4>it's just an oversimplification fallacy, I would argue, because the

948
00:56:40.039 --> 00:56:42.960
<v Speaker 4>idea that the ancient world and you know, in this

949
00:56:43.039 --> 00:56:46.800
<v Speaker 4>barbaric realm, that they were suddenly expected to have the

950
00:56:46.840 --> 00:56:49.039
<v Speaker 4>norms and the ethics of you know, the twenty first

951
00:56:49.079 --> 00:56:51.599
<v Speaker 4>century is just kind of an unrealistic.

952
00:56:51.559 --> 00:56:52.679
<v Speaker 3>Unrealistic expectation.

953
00:56:54.000 --> 00:56:57.960
<v Speaker 4>And also, how does he know that it's more perfect

954
00:56:58.480 --> 00:57:03.599
<v Speaker 4>to immediately give the law of the highest expectations versus

955
00:57:03.639 --> 00:57:07.639
<v Speaker 4>a graduated law giving that leads men over time to

956
00:57:07.840 --> 00:57:09.400
<v Speaker 4>more and more higher standards.

957
00:57:09.719 --> 00:57:12.239
<v Speaker 3>So he's just assuming that that's what's.

958
00:57:12.199 --> 00:57:15.519
<v Speaker 4>Entailed in perfection I have, but I have no idea

959
00:57:15.559 --> 00:57:17.440
<v Speaker 4>how he would know, Aufrey or I that that's what's

960
00:57:17.599 --> 00:57:18.920
<v Speaker 4>entailed in a perfect lawgiver.

961
00:57:19.400 --> 00:57:20.559
<v Speaker 3>And so you could just ask.

962
00:57:20.440 --> 00:57:23.239
<v Speaker 4>Him, you know, epistemic questions as to on what basis

963
00:57:23.280 --> 00:57:25.400
<v Speaker 4>how do you know that was your justification for that assertion.

964
00:57:27.079 --> 00:57:28.440
<v Speaker 3>So because of he's going.

965
00:57:28.440 --> 00:57:31.480
<v Speaker 4>To try to reply on rely on biblical ethics and

966
00:57:31.519 --> 00:57:34.559
<v Speaker 4>the revelation of who God is. Well, God revealed it

967
00:57:34.800 --> 00:57:38.840
<v Speaker 4>such that he gradually, in a graduated way, gave laws

968
00:57:38.840 --> 00:57:41.320
<v Speaker 4>to men to lead them to higher and higher standards.

969
00:57:42.119 --> 00:57:47.400
<v Speaker 4>And then Lewis's documentary gets into the history of slavery

970
00:57:47.519 --> 00:57:52.239
<v Speaker 4>in the history of Christianity. So he just put he put,

971
00:57:52.320 --> 00:57:54.639
<v Speaker 4>like I don't know, a lot of time and effort

972
00:57:54.719 --> 00:57:55.079
<v Speaker 4>into that.

973
00:57:55.199 --> 00:57:57.559
<v Speaker 3>Lewis was working on that for like the last three

974
00:57:57.639 --> 00:58:02.360
<v Speaker 3>or four years. But away good questions. It's open for him.

975
00:58:02.400 --> 00:58:05.199
<v Speaker 3>If you have a question or a comminent you're you're

976
00:58:05.280 --> 00:58:10.840
<v Speaker 3>welcome to bring it up to the table. If you disagree,

977
00:58:10.880 --> 00:58:13.039
<v Speaker 3>you can make an argument. Please make it an argument.

978
00:58:13.119 --> 00:58:14.960
<v Speaker 3>We don't care what you think about me. You can

979
00:58:15.000 --> 00:58:16.719
<v Speaker 3>already just say I'm the worst person. I don't care.

980
00:58:17.880 --> 00:58:22.320
<v Speaker 4>You can say I'm tiny mustache man, interbred with Judas,

981
00:58:22.440 --> 00:58:30.119
<v Speaker 4>interbred with saar On, interbred with Jeffrey BADONCA doc Dahmer.

982
00:58:31.239 --> 00:58:34.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm all four of those combined into also being a

983
00:58:34.440 --> 00:58:36.719
<v Speaker 4>KGB Massade.

984
00:58:36.360 --> 00:58:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Cia operative who worked with Jeff SIMONC. Geffrey.

985
00:58:40.880 --> 00:58:43.719
<v Speaker 4>So I'm all those guys combined as an operative. So

986
00:58:43.760 --> 00:58:46.519
<v Speaker 4>now we know I'm the worst person, and then now

987
00:58:46.519 --> 00:58:48.639
<v Speaker 4>we can just move on to the actual topics.

988
00:58:49.320 --> 00:58:59.440
<v Speaker 6>He what's up, Hello, how's it going?

989
00:58:59.559 --> 00:58:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Jay?

990
00:59:02.880 --> 00:59:09.360
<v Speaker 28>Doing well? I could bring up tag correct. I just

991
00:59:09.440 --> 00:59:13.599
<v Speaker 28>had one question. So when I brought up tag to

992
00:59:13.880 --> 00:59:17.679
<v Speaker 28>an atheist, he brought up that I was affirming the consequence,

993
00:59:17.679 --> 00:59:19.480
<v Speaker 28>and I was wondering how you'd respond to that.

994
00:59:24.280 --> 00:59:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, it's just it's not assuming the thing

995
00:59:26.360 --> 00:59:29.280
<v Speaker 4>in question. So I think if you go watch my

996
00:59:29.400 --> 00:59:36.280
<v Speaker 4>video addressing the top ten objections to tag, and then

997
00:59:36.320 --> 00:59:40.800
<v Speaker 4>there's another one I did, there's the it's the two

998
00:59:40.840 --> 00:59:43.920
<v Speaker 4>most popular tag videos that I did, and I think

999
00:59:43.920 --> 00:59:46.719
<v Speaker 4>I addressed that that objection in both of those videos,

1000
00:59:46.719 --> 00:59:48.840
<v Speaker 4>So go check those out if you want to fuller

1001
00:59:48.960 --> 00:59:51.519
<v Speaker 4>it's just misunderstanding what tag is. So first of all,

1002
00:59:52.719 --> 00:59:56.239
<v Speaker 4>tag is not the same thing as the transcendental argument itself.

1003
00:59:56.400 --> 00:59:58.440
<v Speaker 4>Like transcendent arguments have been used all the way back

1004
00:59:58.480 --> 01:00:02.159
<v Speaker 4>to Aristotle, They've been used all the way back to.

1005
01:00:07.119 --> 01:00:10.559
<v Speaker 3>John Damascus and Book one without the knowledge. I mean,

1006
01:00:10.719 --> 01:00:11.880
<v Speaker 3>they have a long.

1007
01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:14.360
<v Speaker 9>History.

1008
01:00:14.480 --> 01:00:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Right. So if we look at the claim that if

1009
01:00:22.840 --> 01:00:25.400
<v Speaker 3>you I'm looking this up here, so from the consequent

1010
01:00:25.760 --> 01:00:28.199
<v Speaker 3>argue for those don't in the audience, the logical fallacy

1011
01:00:28.199 --> 01:00:32.559
<v Speaker 3>where someone incorrectly concludes that if a conditional statement consequent

1012
01:00:33.679 --> 01:00:37.320
<v Speaker 3>the then part, if that's true, then the antecedent must

1013
01:00:37.320 --> 01:00:44.519
<v Speaker 3>also be true. So the difference is that we're not

1014
01:00:44.639 --> 01:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>saying that because God exists, or excuse me, we're not

1015
01:00:49.199 --> 01:00:52.639
<v Speaker 3>saying that because there's knowledge therefore God exists.

1016
01:00:53.039 --> 01:00:57.119
<v Speaker 4>In the sense of like a fallacy where you are

1017
01:00:57.159 --> 01:01:01.239
<v Speaker 4>dealing with normative claims about day to day type stuff

1018
01:01:01.280 --> 01:01:03.960
<v Speaker 4>or day to day type arguments, the difference is that

1019
01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:07.840
<v Speaker 4>this is dealing with the notion of grounding for an

1020
01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:08.800
<v Speaker 4>entire worldview.

1021
01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:11.559
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of times fallacies are dealing with things

1022
01:01:11.599 --> 01:01:15.480
<v Speaker 3>that are not at that level. Right.

1023
01:01:15.599 --> 01:01:18.920
<v Speaker 4>So sometimes when we talk about circularity, right, people say, well,

1024
01:01:18.960 --> 01:01:21.440
<v Speaker 4>you're being you know, the tag is a circular argument,

1025
01:01:21.480 --> 01:01:24.360
<v Speaker 4>you're committing circularity. And then when we say well, at

1026
01:01:24.599 --> 01:01:28.079
<v Speaker 4>the root level, all arguments are circular, they then say

1027
01:01:28.079 --> 01:01:32.400
<v Speaker 4>something like, aha, see you're giving yourself some the free

1028
01:01:32.400 --> 01:01:36.320
<v Speaker 4>reign to use circular argmentation. That's only when you're dealing

1029
01:01:36.360 --> 01:01:39.079
<v Speaker 4>with things not at the level of a paradigm or

1030
01:01:39.079 --> 01:01:42.559
<v Speaker 4>a worldview, because part of TAG is already just assumes,

1031
01:01:42.599 --> 01:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>or it's baked into the argument that everybody's worldview bottoms

1032
01:01:46.360 --> 01:01:48.119
<v Speaker 4>out is something self referencing.

1033
01:01:48.920 --> 01:01:49.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's true that.

1034
01:01:49.880 --> 01:01:52.280
<v Speaker 4>An atheist could could say, well, I take issue with

1035
01:01:52.360 --> 01:01:54.480
<v Speaker 4>that claim, right, If TAG is built on that, then

1036
01:01:54.480 --> 01:01:56.960
<v Speaker 4>I take issue with that claim that everything is built

1037
01:01:56.960 --> 01:02:00.360
<v Speaker 4>on something self referencing. And if they do, then ninety

1038
01:02:00.440 --> 01:02:01.920
<v Speaker 4>nine percent of the time they're going to end up

1039
01:02:01.920 --> 01:02:06.119
<v Speaker 4>with some kind of classical foundationalism or self evident principles

1040
01:02:06.239 --> 01:02:07.039
<v Speaker 4>or axioms.

1041
01:02:07.400 --> 01:02:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, And the problem is that that's an even worse route

1042
01:02:10.440 --> 01:02:10.679
<v Speaker 3>to take.

1043
01:02:10.719 --> 01:02:12.960
<v Speaker 4>They'd be better off just trying to go after critiquing

1044
01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:16.719
<v Speaker 4>TAG rather than to try to affirm their self evident principles.

1045
01:02:17.119 --> 01:02:19.360
<v Speaker 4>As you saw in the debate with Trent, that's a

1046
01:02:19.480 --> 01:02:23.360
<v Speaker 4>very difficult and impossible task because anytime you try to

1047
01:02:23.400 --> 01:02:26.159
<v Speaker 4>argue that something is self evident, you also assume a

1048
01:02:26.199 --> 01:02:29.920
<v Speaker 4>standard of self evidence that sets it off from the

1049
01:02:29.960 --> 01:02:33.079
<v Speaker 4>things that are not self evident, and thus that standard

1050
01:02:33.119 --> 01:02:36.920
<v Speaker 4>becomes more fundamental than the so called self evidence principle.

1051
01:02:37.440 --> 01:02:40.559
<v Speaker 4>And also the self evidence principle is relying upon that standard,

1052
01:02:40.599 --> 01:02:44.079
<v Speaker 4>and thus if it's relying on something it's not self evident.

1053
01:02:44.880 --> 01:02:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Beyond that, there's also the criterion problem, which, if you

1054
01:02:49.320 --> 01:02:52.679
<v Speaker 4>believe in classical foundationalism or self evidence, criterion problem becomes

1055
01:02:52.719 --> 01:02:59.119
<v Speaker 4>a problem, and resolving that is more difficult than just

1056
01:02:59.159 --> 01:03:02.440
<v Speaker 4>as saying, okay, fine, some everybody's world view botom is

1057
01:03:02.440 --> 01:03:05.119
<v Speaker 4>out at some point. So what TAG is doing is

1058
01:03:05.239 --> 01:03:08.639
<v Speaker 4>arguing not at the normal day to day level of

1059
01:03:08.960 --> 01:03:11.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, I know Bill Cosby is a bad person

1060
01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:15.559
<v Speaker 4>because you know, let's think, how can we put this

1061
01:03:15.599 --> 01:03:25.719
<v Speaker 4>into a firm of the consequent? If I'm trying to

1062
01:03:25.719 --> 01:03:27.960
<v Speaker 4>think of a way to let's say, what the let's

1063
01:03:27.960 --> 01:03:37.559
<v Speaker 4>find an example of a firm of the consequent, So

1064
01:03:37.760 --> 01:03:39.480
<v Speaker 4>you could say something.

1065
01:03:39.199 --> 01:03:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Like the best advice.

1066
01:03:48.239 --> 01:03:50.960
<v Speaker 4>You could give to a first year university student is

1067
01:03:51.000 --> 01:03:53.920
<v Speaker 4>to work hard. If you do well at university, you

1068
01:03:54.039 --> 01:03:59.440
<v Speaker 4>will do even better once you've graduated. Wait a minute,

1069
01:04:00.079 --> 01:04:08.079
<v Speaker 4>that's not It comes an example. Excuse me, if I

1070
01:04:08.159 --> 01:04:09.599
<v Speaker 4>have caffeine.

1071
01:04:09.039 --> 01:04:11.559
<v Speaker 3>I will be awake all night. I'm awake all night,

1072
01:04:11.639 --> 01:04:12.920
<v Speaker 3>therefore I had caffeine.

1073
01:04:13.360 --> 01:04:16.159
<v Speaker 4>So it's a fallacy because there might be multiple reasons

1074
01:04:16.199 --> 01:04:19.679
<v Speaker 4>why you're awake all night, and it doesn't necessitate that

1075
01:04:19.960 --> 01:04:22.800
<v Speaker 4>the way that you were awake was through caffeine. But

1076
01:04:23.360 --> 01:04:26.400
<v Speaker 4>when we're setting up a transcendental argument that's dealing with

1077
01:04:26.519 --> 01:04:29.719
<v Speaker 4>grounding for a worldview, there's not an infinite number of

1078
01:04:29.719 --> 01:04:34.079
<v Speaker 4>possibilities for how you could ground a transcendental category. So

1079
01:04:34.199 --> 01:04:37.000
<v Speaker 4>you might say something like well, and then a lot

1080
01:04:37.039 --> 01:04:38.519
<v Speaker 4>of the atheists do say this, and when we have

1081
01:04:38.599 --> 01:04:41.920
<v Speaker 4>the space come up, they'll say something like, well, you know,

1082
01:04:42.000 --> 01:04:47.440
<v Speaker 4>if I were to formulate the argument like X is

1083
01:04:47.480 --> 01:04:50.280
<v Speaker 4>the necessary condition of why why? Therefore X? You know,

1084
01:04:50.280 --> 01:04:53.239
<v Speaker 4>knowledge is a PREAKONDI. God is breedish of knowledge. Knowledge exists,

1085
01:04:53.239 --> 01:04:59.440
<v Speaker 4>therefore God. There's not an infinite number of reasons that

1086
01:04:59.599 --> 01:05:03.440
<v Speaker 4>you could or ways that you could ground knowledge, right,

1087
01:05:05.400 --> 01:05:09.599
<v Speaker 4>So it's a it's a false comparison to the analogy to.

1088
01:05:14.320 --> 01:05:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, we're trying to drive and I'm trying to give

1089
01:05:15.920 --> 01:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>directions too. At the same time good directions.

1090
01:05:18.360 --> 01:05:22.519
<v Speaker 4>Here, it's a false analogy to the caffeine example, because

1091
01:05:23.039 --> 01:05:26.239
<v Speaker 4>there's multiple reasons and explanations for why you might be

1092
01:05:26.320 --> 01:05:28.679
<v Speaker 4>up all night. Maybe you're nervous, maybe you ate some

1093
01:05:28.719 --> 01:05:30.280
<v Speaker 4>weird food, and it's keeping.

1094
01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:30.639
<v Speaker 3>You up right.

1095
01:05:31.239 --> 01:05:35.000
<v Speaker 4>So it doesn't necessitate that the only reason that you're

1096
01:05:35.079 --> 01:05:36.159
<v Speaker 4>uphole all night is.

1097
01:05:36.119 --> 01:05:39.079
<v Speaker 3>Because you had caffeine. But to apply that to the

1098
01:05:39.119 --> 01:05:41.679
<v Speaker 3>critique of acts as a necessary condition of why why

1099
01:05:41.679 --> 01:05:45.360
<v Speaker 3>therefore X, it's not the same thing because the argument

1100
01:05:45.440 --> 01:05:48.639
<v Speaker 3>is about grounding a paradigm and a worldview in transtional

1101
01:05:48.679 --> 01:05:52.199
<v Speaker 3>categories as a whole, and there are not a host

1102
01:05:52.320 --> 01:05:55.280
<v Speaker 3>of things that could ground that. So even if you.

1103
01:05:55.280 --> 01:06:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Thought that tag was somehow affirming the consequence, the argue

1104
01:06:00.320 --> 01:06:02.679
<v Speaker 4>is actually much more radical than that, because it's actually

1105
01:06:02.800 --> 01:06:07.280
<v Speaker 4>arguing that logic itself presupposes God, so you couldn't use

1106
01:06:07.960 --> 01:06:11.639
<v Speaker 4>logic as a way to cancel out or disprove God's

1107
01:06:11.679 --> 01:06:15.679
<v Speaker 4>existence when the argument is about, well, what grounds logic itself?

1108
01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:19.719
<v Speaker 4>So it's actually missing the forest for the trees in

1109
01:06:19.800 --> 01:06:23.559
<v Speaker 4>terms of what's prior to the thing in question, namely logic,

1110
01:06:23.679 --> 01:06:26.480
<v Speaker 4>if that makes sense. So that was along with an explanation,

1111
01:06:26.599 --> 01:06:34.239
<v Speaker 4>but hopefully that's helpful, Like if the question was just

1112
01:06:34.559 --> 01:06:39.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, a mundane example, like if I drink coffee,

1113
01:06:39.920 --> 01:06:42.079
<v Speaker 4>I will stay up all night. I stayed up all night,

1114
01:06:42.159 --> 01:06:45.000
<v Speaker 4>So therefore it was because of coffee. Well maybe, but

1115
01:06:45.079 --> 01:06:48.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe there's other reasons. Right, that's a mundane example. That's

1116
01:06:48.400 --> 01:06:51.480
<v Speaker 4>not the same thing as saying, well, there's infinite ways

1117
01:06:52.199 --> 01:06:58.519
<v Speaker 4>to ground transmit categories and worldviews. There's not like any

1118
01:06:58.960 --> 01:07:04.679
<v Speaker 4>any kind of thing you start listing, like even if

1119
01:07:04.719 --> 01:07:06.719
<v Speaker 4>you live, even if you thought there was multiple like,

1120
01:07:06.800 --> 01:07:08.840
<v Speaker 4>they're not going to work to do the grounding work,

1121
01:07:09.079 --> 01:07:13.719
<v Speaker 4>so they're missing what the argument actually is. I think

1122
01:07:13.760 --> 01:07:16.079
<v Speaker 4>people get tripped up because it's an argument for a worldview,

1123
01:07:17.119 --> 01:07:20.199
<v Speaker 4>and it's an argument that's prior to logic itself, so

1124
01:07:20.239 --> 01:07:38.639
<v Speaker 4>it's a metallogical argument. It's open for him. If anybody

1125
01:07:38.679 --> 01:07:41.599
<v Speaker 4>wants to hop on, hit the request to speak, and

1126
01:07:41.679 --> 01:07:47.000
<v Speaker 4>you can come up to the top. We can talk Calvinism,

1127
01:07:47.159 --> 01:07:55.280
<v Speaker 4>tag Protestantism, Catholicism is a long atheism, art history rooms, papacy,

1128
01:07:55.440 --> 01:07:59.519
<v Speaker 4>you want to discuss it. You got it, You got it, dude,

1129
01:08:00.920 --> 01:08:04.000
<v Speaker 4>it's open for him. We actually got I thought we

1130
01:08:04.039 --> 01:08:05.880
<v Speaker 4>had two hundred people. There's three hundred and eight people

1131
01:08:05.880 --> 01:08:08.960
<v Speaker 4>in here. I know there's got to be some Calvinist lurkers, y'all.

1132
01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:11.400
<v Speaker 4>Calvin is back there, lurking, y'all lurk, And what y'all

1133
01:08:11.400 --> 01:08:11.840
<v Speaker 4>afraid of?

1134
01:08:12.639 --> 01:08:19.640
<v Speaker 3>John? Danger? We're in danger and John's here. I'm mute.

1135
01:08:26.279 --> 01:08:29.039
<v Speaker 4>Why did you leave? I don't understand. There's three hundred

1136
01:08:29.039 --> 01:08:30.680
<v Speaker 4>people and nobody wants to come up here and talk

1137
01:08:30.680 --> 01:08:32.159
<v Speaker 4>about any of these topics listened.

1138
01:08:32.239 --> 01:08:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't get it.

1139
01:08:32.880 --> 01:08:40.399
<v Speaker 4>There's over three hundred people, Hi, no problem question.

1140
01:08:42.600 --> 01:08:45.680
<v Speaker 29>I was in a debate yesterday and then I was

1141
01:08:45.720 --> 01:08:48.800
<v Speaker 29>listening to what went on afterwards.

1142
01:08:49.600 --> 01:08:56.880
<v Speaker 3>At you dropped out?

1143
01:08:56.960 --> 01:08:57.199
<v Speaker 5>Dude.

1144
01:09:01.479 --> 01:09:07.239
<v Speaker 3>Now he's totally gone. Tell me, dude, is it? Try again?

1145
01:09:07.520 --> 01:09:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Try again?

1146
01:09:08.279 --> 01:09:09.039
<v Speaker 26>Coming back there?

1147
01:09:09.319 --> 01:09:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Yep?

1148
01:09:09.600 --> 01:09:11.199
<v Speaker 30>Okay, sorry, but I don't know what happened.

1149
01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:14.600
<v Speaker 26>Okay, so I'll just shorten it up here.

1150
01:09:16.159 --> 01:09:16.800
<v Speaker 31>A gentleman.

1151
01:09:16.880 --> 01:09:19.720
<v Speaker 30>He proclaims to be uh Eastern Orthodox.

1152
01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:29.840
<v Speaker 3>You must have a bad connection, dude. I don't know.

1153
01:09:29.960 --> 01:09:32.279
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you can get to a space place where you

1154
01:09:32.359 --> 01:09:35.960
<v Speaker 3>got a better connection, but I may not come on now,

1155
01:09:36.039 --> 01:09:40.720
<v Speaker 3>y'all got we got three hundred people in here, over

1156
01:09:40.800 --> 01:09:45.479
<v Speaker 3>three hundred people, and nobody has any objections. I know

1157
01:09:45.520 --> 01:09:46.800
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of Protestant workers.

1158
01:09:46.800 --> 01:09:48.439
<v Speaker 4>I promise I'll be nice to you unless you want

1159
01:09:48.439 --> 01:09:51.520
<v Speaker 4>a debate, if you want, if you want to ask questions,

1160
01:09:51.600 --> 01:09:52.119
<v Speaker 4>come on up.

1161
01:09:52.159 --> 01:09:53.720
<v Speaker 6>I'll be sweet.

1162
01:09:54.479 --> 01:09:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I'll talk to you like Youbama happy, your mama for you.

1163
01:09:59.119 --> 01:10:02.239
<v Speaker 3>I'll be sweet too. Promise I won't hurt your feelings.

1164
01:10:02.279 --> 01:10:04.800
<v Speaker 6>I love you. I'm your mama on the internet.

1165
01:10:05.520 --> 01:10:07.319
<v Speaker 3>I won't be that thinged bank daddy.

1166
01:10:08.239 --> 01:10:09.279
<v Speaker 6>He's in the dog house.

1167
01:10:09.359 --> 01:10:10.680
<v Speaker 3>He ain't gonna get in tonight.

1168
01:10:11.800 --> 01:10:12.880
<v Speaker 5>I'll be your mama.

1169
01:10:13.319 --> 01:10:13.960
<v Speaker 32>I love you.

1170
01:10:14.039 --> 01:10:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh you sweet. Internet boys don't won't get your feelings hood, Trent.

1171
01:10:21.920 --> 01:10:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I missed the days of the Internet when.

1172
01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:27.399
<v Speaker 4>Everybody was just uh it was wild West and everybody

1173
01:10:27.399 --> 01:10:29.279
<v Speaker 4>just made fun of everybody, and you expected to get

1174
01:10:29.279 --> 01:10:31.479
<v Speaker 4>your feelings hurt. Now we're in this atmosphere for like

1175
01:10:32.119 --> 01:10:36.039
<v Speaker 4>he should go out ahead, Trent.

1176
01:10:37.239 --> 01:10:40.079
<v Speaker 33>Hey, Jay, Oh, I hope it's all right if I

1177
01:10:40.079 --> 01:10:41.439
<v Speaker 33>get can asked an Orthodox question.

1178
01:10:41.520 --> 01:10:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I promise it's not like a basic catechumen one. Okay, Yeah,

1179
01:10:45.279 --> 01:10:45.439
<v Speaker 3>I was.

1180
01:10:45.439 --> 01:10:46.920
<v Speaker 33>Wondering if you can explain to me because in my

1181
01:10:46.920 --> 01:10:49.880
<v Speaker 33>local parish community I haven't really gotten any succinct answers,

1182
01:10:50.159 --> 01:10:52.479
<v Speaker 33>but can you like properly explain if like the Russian

1183
01:10:52.560 --> 01:10:55.279
<v Speaker 33>Orthodox Church and Greek Orthodox Church are formerly not in

1184
01:10:55.319 --> 01:10:57.960
<v Speaker 33>communion and if so, what is the consequence of that

1185
01:10:57.960 --> 01:10:59.880
<v Speaker 33>with the ecumenical patriarch.

1186
01:11:01.840 --> 01:11:04.520
<v Speaker 4>As far as I know, they're still out of canonical communion,

1187
01:11:04.760 --> 01:11:08.880
<v Speaker 4>but there has not been a formal excommunication. So church law,

1188
01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:13.439
<v Speaker 4>canon law usually proceeds in stages. Whether it's even the

1189
01:11:13.520 --> 01:11:16.119
<v Speaker 4>Romancallolic Church or whether it's the Orthodox Church, they both

1190
01:11:16.199 --> 01:11:19.199
<v Speaker 4>kind of have some of the same principles about stages

1191
01:11:19.239 --> 01:11:24.439
<v Speaker 4>of canonical procedure, and so if there was an excommunication

1192
01:11:24.560 --> 01:11:27.279
<v Speaker 4>of the EP, they're out of communion right now. But

1193
01:11:27.439 --> 01:11:32.479
<v Speaker 4>for example, we don't rebaptize or quote baptize people who

1194
01:11:32.600 --> 01:11:34.199
<v Speaker 4>were to come to us from the Greeks. We would

1195
01:11:34.239 --> 01:11:36.680
<v Speaker 4>still accept them as having the faith. That might be

1196
01:11:36.760 --> 01:11:41.680
<v Speaker 4>different though, if the situation progressed to a full excommunication,

1197
01:11:42.239 --> 01:11:43.920
<v Speaker 4>and then it would be a dependent then it would

1198
01:11:43.920 --> 01:11:47.920
<v Speaker 4>be a situation where the other patriarchates would choose sides,

1199
01:11:47.960 --> 01:11:50.560
<v Speaker 4>probably whether you know EP or MP.

1200
01:11:51.359 --> 01:11:54.399
<v Speaker 3>So hopefully it doesn't get to that, but we have actually.

1201
01:11:54.039 --> 01:11:57.319
<v Speaker 4>Seen multiple types of things and examples of this in

1202
01:11:57.399 --> 01:11:59.960
<v Speaker 4>church history, Like in the first millennium you had patriarchs

1203
01:12:00.079 --> 01:12:04.000
<v Speaker 4>and schism many times, and it wasn't the Roman bishop

1204
01:12:04.039 --> 01:12:06.439
<v Speaker 4>who just magically solved that in a lot of these cases.

1205
01:12:06.760 --> 01:12:09.840
<v Speaker 4>You even had recently, I think the Macedonian Church that

1206
01:12:09.920 --> 01:12:13.039
<v Speaker 4>was in schism for like eighty years and they resolved

1207
01:12:13.039 --> 01:12:16.079
<v Speaker 4>that conflict last year, so without the pope.

1208
01:12:16.600 --> 01:12:19.359
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, that's where it stands right now.

1209
01:12:19.840 --> 01:12:20.159
<v Speaker 26>Thank you.

1210
01:12:20.199 --> 01:12:22.239
<v Speaker 33>If I can ask a quick follow up, do you

1211
01:12:22.239 --> 01:12:24.520
<v Speaker 33>foresee it going that direction that's what you want?

1212
01:12:24.720 --> 01:12:24.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

1213
01:12:25.039 --> 01:12:26.800
<v Speaker 33>Do you foresee it going that direction with the Greek

1214
01:12:26.840 --> 01:12:28.720
<v Speaker 33>Church based on like your historical understanding.

1215
01:12:31.479 --> 01:12:33.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, because you know, it includes a lot

1216
01:12:33.840 --> 01:12:36.399
<v Speaker 4>of factors. Obviously, the EP is really close to the

1217
01:12:36.399 --> 01:12:38.920
<v Speaker 4>CIA in the State Department, and they're really tied to

1218
01:12:38.960 --> 01:12:43.439
<v Speaker 4>what Washington wants, and uh, you know that makes it

1219
01:12:43.600 --> 01:12:46.119
<v Speaker 4>difficult because it's not just religious stuff, a lot of

1220
01:12:46.119 --> 01:12:48.840
<v Speaker 4>political stuff. So I don't know how that will all

1221
01:12:48.880 --> 01:12:51.720
<v Speaker 4>shake out. You know, you could get a situation where

1222
01:12:51.800 --> 01:12:56.159
<v Speaker 4>if Trump ends the the war in Ukraine, if things

1223
01:12:56.199 --> 01:12:58.239
<v Speaker 4>go in that direction, then that could put an end

1224
01:12:58.239 --> 01:12:59.960
<v Speaker 4>to the Ukraine schism, and that could put an end

1225
01:13:00.079 --> 01:13:03.399
<v Speaker 4>to a lot of these actions of the EP which

1226
01:13:03.439 --> 01:13:06.680
<v Speaker 4>contradict his own statements and actions from prior to the war.

1227
01:13:08.800 --> 01:13:09.760
<v Speaker 26>Okay, that's all I had.

1228
01:13:09.760 --> 01:13:11.439
<v Speaker 33>Thank you very much, Jay, And also I just wanted

1229
01:13:11.439 --> 01:13:12.920
<v Speaker 33>to say, really appreciate all your work.

1230
01:13:12.920 --> 01:13:15.279
<v Speaker 8>You helped me a lot fine Orthodoxy.

1231
01:13:15.720 --> 01:13:17.439
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Trent, appreciate that. That's really kind.

1232
01:13:17.439 --> 01:13:32.560
<v Speaker 4>Where As many years to you otis, what's up, man, beam?

1233
01:13:32.640 --> 01:13:35.439
<v Speaker 4>You want to try if Otis can't connect, I'm.

1234
01:13:42.239 --> 01:13:43.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what's the matter cracking?

1235
01:13:44.199 --> 01:13:48.359
<v Speaker 34>So for the record, I'm a Calvinist, I'm a reformed Anglican.

1236
01:13:48.399 --> 01:13:52.520
<v Speaker 34>That's my specsum coming from. I'm very much aware of

1237
01:13:52.560 --> 01:13:55.680
<v Speaker 34>your criticisms of Calvinism, and you know about the whole

1238
01:13:55.720 --> 01:14:00.560
<v Speaker 34>like what was it again you say, well, totally means

1239
01:14:00.560 --> 01:14:02.079
<v Speaker 34>that we can't know if we're elected and so on.

1240
01:14:02.159 --> 01:14:04.640
<v Speaker 34>So I understand a lot of your criticisms.

1241
01:14:05.520 --> 01:14:08.279
<v Speaker 3>But I mean that's a very minor criticism. The majority

1242
01:14:08.279 --> 01:14:09.479
<v Speaker 3>of my criticisms are hard.

1243
01:14:09.960 --> 01:14:12.399
<v Speaker 34>Yeah, I know it's one of them, and I know

1244
01:14:12.439 --> 01:14:14.039
<v Speaker 34>they are like other like things.

1245
01:14:14.079 --> 01:14:17.560
<v Speaker 4>You think, Oh, well, the majority of the majority are crystological.

1246
01:14:17.680 --> 01:14:19.840
<v Speaker 4>So maybe if you want to debate that, you can

1247
01:14:19.880 --> 01:14:20.319
<v Speaker 4>address that.

1248
01:14:20.479 --> 01:14:20.600
<v Speaker 25>Well.

1249
01:14:20.760 --> 01:14:23.399
<v Speaker 34>I had a question, if that's fine, just one question

1250
01:14:23.439 --> 01:14:28.720
<v Speaker 34>about these Orthodox position. Okay, yeah, so obviously you know

1251
01:14:28.760 --> 01:14:31.359
<v Speaker 34>you used to be a Calvinist. You you at least

1252
01:14:31.600 --> 01:14:34.960
<v Speaker 34>know what we think is comforting about Calvinism, right like

1253
01:14:36.039 --> 01:14:39.359
<v Speaker 34>we think that because we're elect we're in God's hands

1254
01:14:39.359 --> 01:14:41.880
<v Speaker 34>and salvation doesn't depend on us, and so on, and

1255
01:14:41.920 --> 01:14:45.840
<v Speaker 34>so at least two, maybe the everyday person people can

1256
01:14:45.920 --> 01:14:51.079
<v Speaker 34>understand what the comfort is in Calvinism with unconditional election

1257
01:14:51.119 --> 01:14:53.479
<v Speaker 34>in particular, even if you think it doesn't make sense,

1258
01:14:54.039 --> 01:14:56.640
<v Speaker 34>I get that. But you can see how there is

1259
01:14:56.680 --> 01:15:01.239
<v Speaker 34>a comfort there. How do you because the way I

1260
01:15:01.279 --> 01:15:03.239
<v Speaker 34>understand it, And if you want to just say, well,

1261
01:15:03.279 --> 01:15:07.319
<v Speaker 34>my interpretation's wrong, that's fine. Saint Paul talks of predestination

1262
01:15:07.399 --> 01:15:12.159
<v Speaker 34>as a comfort in scripture, and I just don't understand

1263
01:15:12.880 --> 01:15:16.000
<v Speaker 34>how that makes sense if you don't hold on conditional election.

1264
01:15:16.520 --> 01:15:19.760
<v Speaker 34>How like, is there any comfort in predestination for the

1265
01:15:19.800 --> 01:15:21.439
<v Speaker 34>East Orthodox or not?

1266
01:15:22.279 --> 01:15:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean comfort in the sense of we view

1267
01:15:25.960 --> 01:15:29.920
<v Speaker 4>predestination in those passages as primarily dealing with collectives. And

1268
01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:31.920
<v Speaker 4>so if you look at even the statement in Rome's

1269
01:15:32.000 --> 01:15:34.239
<v Speaker 4>nine about Jacob and Esau, if you go back and

1270
01:15:34.279 --> 01:15:37.000
<v Speaker 4>read it in the original passages talking about the nations,

1271
01:15:37.880 --> 01:15:40.640
<v Speaker 4>and so when Paul writes to the Ephesians, for example,

1272
01:15:40.720 --> 01:15:44.079
<v Speaker 4>he calls the entire visible church at Ephesus the predestined,

1273
01:15:44.119 --> 01:15:46.399
<v Speaker 4>he does not single it out for the invisible church.

1274
01:15:46.439 --> 01:15:50.800
<v Speaker 34>Okay, so would you say that there's any comfort we

1275
01:15:50.840 --> 01:15:53.720
<v Speaker 34>can derive as individual Christians.

1276
01:15:53.640 --> 01:15:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Or absolutely, That's what the sacraments are there for, is

1277
01:15:57.439 --> 01:16:02.199
<v Speaker 3>to actually provide that's comfort and assurance that well, I.

1278
01:16:02.159 --> 01:16:06.039
<v Speaker 34>Mean specifically for predestination. Like obviously sacraments of you know,

1279
01:16:06.760 --> 01:16:08.159
<v Speaker 34>they be assured a little bit.

1280
01:16:08.199 --> 01:16:10.239
<v Speaker 4>Again, I mean, I could even I could even say

1281
01:16:10.239 --> 01:16:14.720
<v Speaker 4>with the Augustinian position that, like, like Augustine said, even

1282
01:16:14.760 --> 01:16:20.479
<v Speaker 4>if the final persevering elect are the real true quote predestined,

1283
01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:22.680
<v Speaker 4>we don't know who has that, and we don't in

1284
01:16:22.720 --> 01:16:25.039
<v Speaker 4>other words, we don't know who has the gift of perseverance. So,

1285
01:16:25.079 --> 01:16:29.159
<v Speaker 4>for example, even the Augustinian model refutes that idea because

1286
01:16:29.199 --> 01:16:34.279
<v Speaker 4>he believes in a collective predestining, so to speak to grace.

1287
01:16:34.520 --> 01:16:36.880
<v Speaker 4>But that doesn't ensure that, that doesn't ensure that you

1288
01:16:36.960 --> 01:16:40.199
<v Speaker 4>have the gifts of perseverance, because many fall away and apostatize.

1289
01:16:40.520 --> 01:16:42.680
<v Speaker 34>All right, thank you, then have a nice one.

1290
01:16:44.239 --> 01:16:55.159
<v Speaker 35>Yeah, good questions. Hold on one second, team.

1291
01:17:07.039 --> 01:17:10.079
<v Speaker 36>I'll go ahead, Bean, Yeah, I just wanted to add

1292
01:17:10.119 --> 01:17:12.880
<v Speaker 36>on to what the guy was seeing, the affirming the

1293
01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:19.199
<v Speaker 36>consequent Uh, the way that tag is argued, I wouldn't say, well,

1294
01:17:19.279 --> 01:17:21.560
<v Speaker 36>like tag isn't being argued.

1295
01:17:22.560 --> 01:17:26.399
<v Speaker 6>Uh, let's see, let's see.

1296
01:17:27.239 --> 01:17:28.039
<v Speaker 3>How do I see this?

1297
01:17:30.600 --> 01:17:31.840
<v Speaker 8>I hid it in my head and I just kind

1298
01:17:31.840 --> 01:17:32.760
<v Speaker 8>of figure, hold on.

1299
01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:38.439
<v Speaker 3>All right, well you can you can think about it.

1300
01:17:38.439 --> 01:17:41.680
<v Speaker 3>You can think about it, come back, major danger? What's up?

1301
01:17:52.800 --> 01:17:53.439
<v Speaker 3>Got a mute?

1302
01:18:02.479 --> 01:18:03.159
<v Speaker 5>If you want.

1303
01:18:07.079 --> 01:18:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Major danger? Unmute? If you'd like to speak, are you there?

1304
01:18:24.840 --> 01:18:26.399
<v Speaker 3>You gotta turn your mic on? If you guys want

1305
01:18:26.399 --> 01:18:28.760
<v Speaker 3>to speak. I don't like nobody's used. We've been doing

1306
01:18:28.800 --> 01:18:35.279
<v Speaker 3>these spaces for how many years? Are you there?

1307
01:18:38.199 --> 01:18:40.079
<v Speaker 4>Anybody else is open for him? If you'd like to

1308
01:18:40.119 --> 01:18:42.800
<v Speaker 4>come up topics that are alvin.

1309
01:18:42.520 --> 01:18:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Isn't protests, but also is the Muslims church, history of

1310
01:18:48.279 --> 01:18:51.000
<v Speaker 3>deal politics. We can make it whatever we want. Jen,

1311
01:18:51.159 --> 01:18:51.760
<v Speaker 3>what's up? Jen?

1312
01:18:57.479 --> 01:19:10.159
<v Speaker 37>I'm mute, En. Nobody wants to speak. You guys don't

1313
01:19:10.199 --> 01:19:17.720
<v Speaker 37>know how to do this? Go ahead?

1314
01:19:21.680 --> 01:19:28.119
<v Speaker 3>Hello, yep, Hey, how are you doing? Jack? Yeah, what's up?

1315
01:19:28.119 --> 01:19:28.239
<v Speaker 5>Man?

1316
01:19:29.199 --> 01:19:29.319
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

1317
01:19:29.720 --> 01:19:31.760
<v Speaker 38>I'm kind of curious if you know this from your

1318
01:19:31.800 --> 01:19:33.840
<v Speaker 38>study of Catholicism.

1319
01:19:33.960 --> 01:19:35.199
<v Speaker 3>I was Patholic as well.

1320
01:19:35.840 --> 01:19:40.600
<v Speaker 38>I'm something that's I've been wondering is do you think

1321
01:19:40.640 --> 01:19:46.840
<v Speaker 38>there was a theological basis for the Latin Church using

1322
01:19:47.119 --> 01:19:52.600
<v Speaker 38>unleavened bread in the uh in the around the fifth

1323
01:19:52.640 --> 01:19:53.600
<v Speaker 38>to the seventhde Suries.

1324
01:19:57.439 --> 01:20:00.119
<v Speaker 3>Is there a theological basis? I don't know what they

1325
01:20:00.119 --> 01:20:00.760
<v Speaker 3>would have argued.

1326
01:20:01.399 --> 01:20:04.439
<v Speaker 38>I don't know either. I heard theories that because of

1327
01:20:04.479 --> 01:20:08.239
<v Speaker 38>the Germanic migrations they were in a state of penitence,

1328
01:20:08.560 --> 01:20:10.199
<v Speaker 38>and oh, okay.

1329
01:20:10.439 --> 01:20:11.960
<v Speaker 3>I also heard.

1330
01:20:11.840 --> 01:20:15.279
<v Speaker 38>That because of the cutting off of the Mediterranean they

1331
01:20:15.279 --> 01:20:23.000
<v Speaker 38>couldn't receive proper grade for leamon bread from Egypt. So

1332
01:20:23.119 --> 01:20:25.399
<v Speaker 38>I was just curious if you knew anything of like

1333
01:20:26.479 --> 01:20:28.159
<v Speaker 38>exactly why they did.

1334
01:20:29.720 --> 01:20:31.760
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't know, And you know, that might be

1335
01:20:31.880 --> 01:20:36.640
<v Speaker 4>a situation where there could be, you know, some canonical

1336
01:20:36.680 --> 01:20:39.720
<v Speaker 4>wiggle room. It's kind of like the Orthodox Church, for example,

1337
01:20:39.960 --> 01:20:44.560
<v Speaker 4>in Japan, as I understand it, Japan, the government mandates

1338
01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:49.079
<v Speaker 4>that people have to get cremated, and Orthodox can of

1339
01:20:49.159 --> 01:20:53.479
<v Speaker 4>law doesn't allow for cremation. But they ruled that it's

1340
01:20:53.520 --> 01:20:57.319
<v Speaker 4>better to have the Church in Japan and accept cremation

1341
01:20:57.479 --> 01:20:59.239
<v Speaker 4>than to not have the Orthodox Church in Japan.

1342
01:21:00.039 --> 01:21:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh Canon's are you know? Chirk law is the spirit

1343
01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:04.680
<v Speaker 3>of the law, and that's.

1344
01:21:06.119 --> 01:21:06.479
<v Speaker 5>What's up.

1345
01:21:12.159 --> 01:21:20.840
<v Speaker 35>Alright, Hello, all right, so wasting everyone's time in uh defiance?

1346
01:21:20.880 --> 01:21:21.199
<v Speaker 3>What's up?

1347
01:21:21.439 --> 01:21:21.880
<v Speaker 5>Hey man?

1348
01:21:23.279 --> 01:21:26.439
<v Speaker 39>Hey, So I've been listening to you for quite a bit.

1349
01:21:26.560 --> 01:21:29.520
<v Speaker 39>Love your stuff. I kind of am considering myself a

1350
01:21:29.560 --> 01:21:36.600
<v Speaker 39>recovering Calvinist. But I have a question about Romans chapter nine. Okay,

1351
01:21:36.800 --> 01:21:40.319
<v Speaker 39>So in Romans chapter nine, Paul kind of lays out

1352
01:21:40.359 --> 01:21:44.840
<v Speaker 39>his case and then he gets to the point and

1353
01:21:44.920 --> 01:21:47.720
<v Speaker 39>I can't I can't cite it exactly, but he gets

1354
01:21:47.720 --> 01:21:50.520
<v Speaker 39>to the point where he kind of anticipates the counter argument,

1355
01:21:51.039 --> 01:21:53.800
<v Speaker 39>and he says something along the lines of so what like, so,

1356
01:21:53.800 --> 01:21:57.000
<v Speaker 39>so what if God did make vessels for wrath and

1357
01:21:57.119 --> 01:21:58.039
<v Speaker 39>vessels for glory?

1358
01:21:58.239 --> 01:22:01.319
<v Speaker 4>You go back to the passage where it's originally cited.

1359
01:22:01.560 --> 01:22:06.520
<v Speaker 4>It's a passage that's talking collectively about nations. Jacob and

1360
01:22:06.760 --> 01:22:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Esau are two nations in the womb. And the point

1361
01:22:11.760 --> 01:22:13.319
<v Speaker 4>that I made to the other guy is that we

1362
01:22:13.399 --> 01:22:16.560
<v Speaker 4>know that it's collective because the same terminology and language

1363
01:22:16.600 --> 01:22:21.680
<v Speaker 4>that Paul uses in Ephesians is used of the collective

1364
01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:25.560
<v Speaker 4>visible church at Ephesus and for the for the Calvinist

1365
01:22:25.600 --> 01:22:29.760
<v Speaker 4>ex of Jesus. To be correct and to work, Paul

1366
01:22:29.840 --> 01:22:31.760
<v Speaker 4>has to then be writing not to the church at

1367
01:22:31.760 --> 01:22:35.039
<v Speaker 4>Ephesus that has a bishop named Timothy, but to the

1368
01:22:35.119 --> 01:22:42.960
<v Speaker 4>elect at Ephesus, who are the unknown, invisible church, Aaron,

1369
01:22:43.119 --> 01:22:56.199
<v Speaker 4>the non binary. So I guess there's like a bunch

1370
01:22:56.239 --> 01:22:59.760
<v Speaker 4>of profiles three, now two, and then this will be

1371
01:22:59.840 --> 01:23:03.079
<v Speaker 4>the third one calling in to play country music.

1372
01:23:03.760 --> 01:23:10.319
<v Speaker 3>Let's see if this one does it. Fat pussy, please

1373
01:23:10.359 --> 01:23:15.640
<v Speaker 3>come play your country music, all right, So guess not

1374
01:23:17.439 --> 01:23:28.720
<v Speaker 3>fry guys, yep.

1375
01:23:30.279 --> 01:23:32.520
<v Speaker 40>I just had a couple of questions. I'm actually an

1376
01:23:32.600 --> 01:23:38.479
<v Speaker 40>Orthodox catechumen converting from Roman Catholicism, and I've been seeking

1377
01:23:38.520 --> 01:23:44.840
<v Speaker 40>out I've been seeking out various Protestant sources and Catholic

1378
01:23:44.880 --> 01:23:49.319
<v Speaker 40>sources for you know, during this mass conversion of Orthodoxy.

1379
01:23:49.640 --> 01:23:52.239
<v Speaker 40>Maybe why you shouldn't convert, just because I'm curious to

1380
01:23:52.239 --> 01:23:54.520
<v Speaker 40>see their arguments, And yeah.

1381
01:23:54.319 --> 01:23:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I think we should be aware of all that. I

1382
01:23:55.640 --> 01:23:56.600
<v Speaker 3>think that's a good thing to do.

1383
01:23:57.439 --> 01:24:00.079
<v Speaker 40>I actually had a little conversation with Redeem zo U

1384
01:24:00.560 --> 01:24:04.840
<v Speaker 40>in the DMS, and I just wanted to ask. He

1385
01:24:04.960 --> 01:24:10.640
<v Speaker 40>mentioned that Oriental Orthodoxy is more quote unchanged than Eastern Orthodoxy,

1386
01:24:11.079 --> 01:24:13.600
<v Speaker 40>and he never really elaborated. Do you know what he

1387
01:24:13.680 --> 01:24:14.359
<v Speaker 40>might mean by that?

1388
01:24:16.159 --> 01:24:19.239
<v Speaker 4>Uh, he's probably just referring to some thing he heard

1389
01:24:19.279 --> 01:24:21.359
<v Speaker 4>somebody say. I don't think he knows anything about any

1390
01:24:21.399 --> 01:24:21.960
<v Speaker 4>of that stuff.

1391
01:24:22.600 --> 01:24:24.600
<v Speaker 41>Yeah, that makes sense to me.

1392
01:24:24.880 --> 01:24:28.359
<v Speaker 40>Another thing he mentioned was was Palamism, and I noticed

1393
01:24:28.359 --> 01:24:30.680
<v Speaker 40>there's a lot of a lot of people who take

1394
01:24:30.720 --> 01:24:34.960
<v Speaker 40>issue with Gregory Palamas. I don't really know why that is.

1395
01:24:35.039 --> 01:24:38.920
<v Speaker 40>Do you know why all these different Protestants really don't

1396
01:24:38.960 --> 01:24:39.399
<v Speaker 40>like Gregory.

1397
01:24:40.279 --> 01:24:42.800
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people are speaking from ignorance, and they

1398
01:24:42.840 --> 01:24:45.479
<v Speaker 4>don't know that the Compadocians teach the essen Sentergi stinction.

1399
01:24:45.600 --> 01:24:48.279
<v Speaker 4>They don't know that Althanatius teaches the ssen sentert sinction.

1400
01:24:49.079 --> 01:24:52.159
<v Speaker 4>Sat Sterrihal teaches it explicitly. He talks about the energies

1401
01:24:52.159 --> 01:24:56.119
<v Speaker 4>that are not the essence. I mean, you can't really

1402
01:24:56.119 --> 01:24:58.119
<v Speaker 4>even have the real presence in the Eucharist without the

1403
01:24:58.319 --> 01:25:02.840
<v Speaker 4>sentergy sinction, because you're don't necessarily have a created grace,

1404
01:25:02.920 --> 01:25:05.640
<v Speaker 4>a created God in the eu Christ which doesn't exist

1405
01:25:05.680 --> 01:25:07.560
<v Speaker 4>or doesn't things that created God, or you're going to

1406
01:25:07.560 --> 01:25:09.479
<v Speaker 4>be getting the divine esdence if you believe in absolute

1407
01:25:09.479 --> 01:25:12.359
<v Speaker 4>divine simplicity, so the only the essence interestinction can make

1408
01:25:12.439 --> 01:25:16.119
<v Speaker 4>sense of the Eucharist. Looks like it's going to be

1409
01:25:16.159 --> 01:25:28.159
<v Speaker 4>another Taylor Swift song, Michelle, I'm mute. Why are you

1410
01:25:28.199 --> 01:25:29.960
<v Speaker 4>raising your hand when I just told you to I'm mute?

1411
01:25:30.800 --> 01:25:31.640
<v Speaker 42>Were you speaking to me?

1412
01:25:31.800 --> 01:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Jay?

1413
01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:33.319
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

1414
01:25:33.399 --> 01:25:36.319
<v Speaker 42>Sorry, I think there's a pause between sometimes we request

1415
01:25:36.359 --> 01:25:39.479
<v Speaker 42>and when you tell us to speak, So I apologize. Yeah,

1416
01:25:39.479 --> 01:25:43.439
<v Speaker 42>I just had thanks for your spaces. I pride myself

1417
01:25:43.439 --> 01:25:46.119
<v Speaker 42>in being able to comprehend pretty well, but I usually

1418
01:25:46.119 --> 01:25:48.640
<v Speaker 42>have to listen to your recorded spaces and take notes

1419
01:25:48.640 --> 01:25:51.000
<v Speaker 42>and kind of go over it again. So thanks for

1420
01:25:51.079 --> 01:25:55.840
<v Speaker 42>recording them. I was in Jerusalem last year, long story short.

1421
01:25:55.840 --> 01:26:00.479
<v Speaker 42>It was in emphesis and Jerusalem actually left October sixth, believe.

1422
01:26:00.279 --> 01:26:00.600
<v Speaker 6>It or not.

1423
01:26:01.039 --> 01:26:03.560
<v Speaker 42>And while I was there, I just I prayed for

1424
01:26:03.600 --> 01:26:07.159
<v Speaker 42>the Lord to really reveal himself and to send people

1425
01:26:07.199 --> 01:26:11.720
<v Speaker 42>who were true seekers of the truth to me. Orthodox

1426
01:26:11.760 --> 01:26:14.520
<v Speaker 42>priests approached me again, long story short, while I was

1427
01:26:14.560 --> 01:26:18.439
<v Speaker 42>in the Holy sepulcher and said, hey, God told me

1428
01:26:18.479 --> 01:26:21.199
<v Speaker 42>that you wanted to pray with me, and it was

1429
01:26:21.279 --> 01:26:24.880
<v Speaker 42>just wild. Then when I went to Ephesus, almost the

1430
01:26:24.960 --> 01:26:28.239
<v Speaker 42>exact same thing happened. To me, so really diving in

1431
01:26:28.279 --> 01:26:31.680
<v Speaker 42>and studying all this, but on a side I don't know,

1432
01:26:31.720 --> 01:26:36.680
<v Speaker 42>conspiracyal note, do you think or believe that this pope,

1433
01:26:36.760 --> 01:26:40.159
<v Speaker 42>being the first Jesuit pope, is the last pope? And

1434
01:26:40.279 --> 01:26:42.560
<v Speaker 42>do you have any videos or discuss any of the

1435
01:26:42.600 --> 01:26:44.439
<v Speaker 42>Jesuit influence upon the Catholic Church?

1436
01:26:44.520 --> 01:26:44.840
<v Speaker 43>Thank you?

1437
01:26:47.720 --> 01:26:50.399
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, this is a topic I love to go

1438
01:26:50.479 --> 01:26:53.119
<v Speaker 4>into and I rarely get asked about it. So the

1439
01:26:53.199 --> 01:26:55.800
<v Speaker 4>greatest book for this is actually written by a traditional

1440
01:26:55.840 --> 01:26:59.439
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholic. His name is David Wimhoff, and he wrote

1441
01:26:59.640 --> 01:27:05.119
<v Speaker 4>nadam page book called John Courtney John Courtney Murray, Timelife

1442
01:27:05.159 --> 01:27:09.680
<v Speaker 4>Magazine and the Doctrinal Warfare proposition CIA's influence in the

1443
01:27:09.680 --> 01:27:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Cali Church using the Jesuits, particularly John Courtney Murray. That's

1444
01:27:14.039 --> 01:27:17.359
<v Speaker 4>obviously more of a twentieth century analysis, particularly Vatican two,

1445
01:27:17.439 --> 01:27:21.680
<v Speaker 4>in the post Vatican two era soft power usage of

1446
01:27:21.720 --> 01:27:24.479
<v Speaker 4>the Cali Church by the American deep state. It's a

1447
01:27:24.479 --> 01:27:28.479
<v Speaker 4>really really well researched, le well referenced. I mean has

1448
01:27:28.560 --> 01:27:32.239
<v Speaker 4>I think eight hundred foot notes. So Wemoff's book is

1449
01:27:32.279 --> 01:27:37.079
<v Speaker 4>probably the best, absolute perfect book on the topic. I

1450
01:27:37.159 --> 01:27:41.039
<v Speaker 4>have lectured about seven or eight hours on that book

1451
01:27:41.119 --> 01:27:43.640
<v Speaker 4>on my YouTube channel, and so if you just look

1452
01:27:43.720 --> 01:27:48.880
<v Speaker 4>up Jesuits, Cia, OSS wm Off, you'll get all of those.

1453
01:27:49.399 --> 01:27:53.159
<v Speaker 4>Another good book on this is Operation Gladio by Paul Williams,

1454
01:27:53.199 --> 01:27:56.720
<v Speaker 4>who is also a Catholic who I think is like

1455
01:27:56.760 --> 01:28:00.640
<v Speaker 4>a history professor. He wrote on this, and I think

1456
01:28:00.680 --> 01:28:03.279
<v Speaker 4>he's kind of pretty much done with Catholicism after he

1457
01:28:03.319 --> 01:28:06.479
<v Speaker 4>went deep into the Gladio rabbit hole. But Gladio also

1458
01:28:06.880 --> 01:28:09.279
<v Speaker 4>is adjacent to all this through the Jesuits too. It

1459
01:28:09.279 --> 01:28:12.319
<v Speaker 4>doesn't it's not explicitly about Jesuits, but it's about the

1460
01:28:12.319 --> 01:28:15.600
<v Speaker 4>CIA's connection to the Vatican Bank and all that. Written

1461
01:28:15.600 --> 01:28:18.319
<v Speaker 4>by and again another Catholic who's not a quote conspiracy theoristy,

1462
01:28:18.359 --> 01:28:21.479
<v Speaker 4>he's a professor. So those are two that deal more

1463
01:28:21.520 --> 01:28:25.680
<v Speaker 4>recently with that. In road to the Roman Catholic Church.

1464
01:28:26.760 --> 01:28:28.159
<v Speaker 4>I think that there's a lot of kind of low

1465
01:28:28.239 --> 01:28:31.520
<v Speaker 4>tier Seven Day Aventists type people that are idiots. They

1466
01:28:31.520 --> 01:28:34.279
<v Speaker 4>think that the Jesuits around the world that stuff's really stupid.

1467
01:28:34.800 --> 01:28:36.800
<v Speaker 4>But the Jesuits do have a role to play in

1468
01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:40.840
<v Speaker 4>kind of influencing the Roman Catholic Church to be what

1469
01:28:40.960 --> 01:28:45.159
<v Speaker 4>it is nowadays with this hyper liberalization, especially with Francis.

1470
01:28:45.159 --> 01:28:48.720
<v Speaker 4>I think Francis is really the the ultimate example of that.

1471
01:28:48.960 --> 01:28:51.800
<v Speaker 4>And you know, he was already kind of allied with

1472
01:28:51.880 --> 01:28:55.439
<v Speaker 4>the CIA in Operation Condor, and it's so you know,

1473
01:28:55.439 --> 01:28:59.239
<v Speaker 4>if you follow his trajectory, it really makes there's no

1474
01:28:59.319 --> 01:29:03.600
<v Speaker 4>surprise there that he would, you know, be friends with

1475
01:29:04.359 --> 01:29:07.479
<v Speaker 4>all the people from Davos. You know, his mentor is

1476
01:29:07.520 --> 01:29:10.720
<v Speaker 4>one of Klaus's best friends from you know, World Economic Forum.

1477
01:29:11.760 --> 01:29:14.640
<v Speaker 4>He promotes the United Nations the World Economic Forum values

1478
01:29:14.640 --> 01:29:17.880
<v Speaker 4>and ideas. So I think it's pretty transparent nowadays. If

1479
01:29:17.920 --> 01:29:20.279
<v Speaker 4>you talked about this a while back, you know, this

1480
01:29:20.479 --> 01:29:23.000
<v Speaker 4>was this is all you're crazy, it's crazy, coup plant.

1481
01:29:23.560 --> 01:29:26.000
<v Speaker 4>But all this stuff is actually pretty well documented. It was,

1482
01:29:26.159 --> 01:29:29.439
<v Speaker 4>it was in all the geopolitical literature. Just a lot

1483
01:29:29.439 --> 01:29:32.199
<v Speaker 4>of people don't know about it. I think that's more

1484
01:29:32.239 --> 01:29:37.479
<v Speaker 4>important than even you know, the origins of Ignacious, Loyola

1485
01:29:37.680 --> 01:29:38.600
<v Speaker 4>and the Jesuit Order.

1486
01:29:38.640 --> 01:29:40.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, all that stuff is interesting, it's.

1487
01:29:40.079 --> 01:29:44.479
<v Speaker 4>Fascinating, and they have a curious history. I wouldn't be

1488
01:29:44.520 --> 01:29:50.119
<v Speaker 4>surprised if Ignacious' model of spiritual exercises wasn't borrowed from

1489
01:29:50.199 --> 01:29:51.359
<v Speaker 4>his esoteric days.

1490
01:29:53.079 --> 01:29:54.000
<v Speaker 3>So for those that don't know.

1491
01:29:54.920 --> 01:30:02.119
<v Speaker 4>Uh, Ignacious Loyol of the before he converted to Catholicism,

1492
01:30:02.279 --> 01:30:06.039
<v Speaker 4>was involved in some kind of esoteric group. I don't

1493
01:30:06.079 --> 01:30:08.840
<v Speaker 4>They weren't the Illuminati, but they called themselves something like

1494
01:30:08.880 --> 01:30:11.239
<v Speaker 4>the Illuminatos or the Enlightened Ones.

1495
01:30:11.159 --> 01:30:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Or something like that.

1496
01:30:12.720 --> 01:30:15.319
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not even saying that that necessarily means his

1497
01:30:15.359 --> 01:30:19.359
<v Speaker 4>conversion wasn't genuine. I mean, he could have been fully genuine,

1498
01:30:19.399 --> 01:30:24.800
<v Speaker 4>but regardless, he did bring a lot of those spiritual

1499
01:30:24.840 --> 01:30:28.800
<v Speaker 4>practices quote unquote into the Jesuit order, and then that

1500
01:30:28.880 --> 01:30:33.520
<v Speaker 4>became something that was very useful for cell networks and

1501
01:30:33.560 --> 01:30:34.680
<v Speaker 4>intelligence networks.

1502
01:30:34.800 --> 01:30:49.880
<v Speaker 3>So there's a long history to this, Brandon, it was a.

1503
01:30:51.199 --> 01:30:54.640
<v Speaker 44>I did a quick question, well a two part question.

1504
01:30:55.560 --> 01:31:00.119
<v Speaker 44>So the first one is given the chaos of the

1505
01:31:00.159 --> 01:31:08.760
<v Speaker 44>early Church prior to the Nice Scene Council, and I

1506
01:31:08.840 --> 01:31:13.520
<v Speaker 44>suppose I've heard this on Joe Rogan's podcast, but do

1507
01:31:13.600 --> 01:31:18.000
<v Speaker 44>you think there's any credibility to this idea that the

1508
01:31:18.079 --> 01:31:23.520
<v Speaker 44>early Church might have incorporated psychedelics in their Eucharist? And

1509
01:31:23.640 --> 01:31:25.800
<v Speaker 44>as a follow up question, do you think there's any

1510
01:31:26.359 --> 01:31:30.039
<v Speaker 44>spiritual value to the use of psychedelics.

1511
01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:34.239
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think there's anything incredible at all about that.

1512
01:31:36.079 --> 01:31:39.920
<v Speaker 4>John Aleegro was kind of rejected and kicked out of

1513
01:31:39.920 --> 01:31:43.199
<v Speaker 4>academia when he proposed the theory some decades ago. It's

1514
01:31:43.279 --> 01:31:45.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of just seen still as a quack theory. I

1515
01:31:45.720 --> 01:31:48.520
<v Speaker 4>don't think there's really anything in Christianity at all amenable

1516
01:31:48.520 --> 01:31:53.880
<v Speaker 4>to or consistent with pollucinogenics. I mean, even even Alvis Toxley,

1517
01:31:53.920 --> 01:31:59.359
<v Speaker 4>who wrote about superiority of pollucinogens to bread and wine

1518
01:31:59.359 --> 01:32:03.079
<v Speaker 4>and the Eucharist, didn't think that there was anything hallucinogenic

1519
01:32:03.119 --> 01:32:09.000
<v Speaker 4>about Christianity's notion of the Eucharist. And there could be,

1520
01:32:09.359 --> 01:32:13.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, some usage for extreme cases of people with extreme.

1521
01:32:15.079 --> 01:32:16.479
<v Speaker 3>Like I had a friend.

1522
01:32:16.159 --> 01:32:19.359
<v Speaker 4>Who was an extreme alcoholic and drank himself to death,

1523
01:32:20.159 --> 01:32:23.479
<v Speaker 4>and I would have said maybe in his case, like,

1524
01:32:24.319 --> 01:32:26.600
<v Speaker 4>since he was at the point of almost dying, like,

1525
01:32:26.840 --> 01:32:27.840
<v Speaker 4>might as well.

1526
01:32:28.239 --> 01:32:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Try some kind of you know whatever.

1527
01:32:32.680 --> 01:32:36.439
<v Speaker 4>However, they do the therapy with you know, aohuasc or whatever,

1528
01:32:36.479 --> 01:32:41.119
<v Speaker 4>which sometimes works for people who have extreme addictions.

1529
01:32:41.399 --> 01:32:46.760
<v Speaker 3>So maybe in extreme cases, but no, I don't think

1530
01:32:46.960 --> 01:32:50.000
<v Speaker 3>generally speaking, human beings should be trying to have spiritual

1531
01:32:50.000 --> 01:33:05.399
<v Speaker 3>experiences with hallucinogens. Rhodesian chet Hanks, Hey J.

1532
01:33:06.319 --> 01:33:10.199
<v Speaker 45>Sorry, my audio kind of went out. One interesting thing

1533
01:33:10.239 --> 01:33:13.000
<v Speaker 45>you mentioned about Huxley, and I think why Orthodox should

1534
01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:16.359
<v Speaker 45>always avoid psychedelics is you put your trust in them.

1535
01:33:16.439 --> 01:33:20.119
<v Speaker 45>I think Huxley died tripping. He like asked for a

1536
01:33:20.119 --> 01:33:23.640
<v Speaker 45>bunch of acid on his deathbed. Yeah, thanks, so yeah,

1537
01:33:23.680 --> 01:33:26.239
<v Speaker 45>so I mean that kind of summarizes it well anyway,

1538
01:33:26.319 --> 01:33:26.680
<v Speaker 45>thank you.

1539
01:33:29.439 --> 01:33:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's an interesting point.

1540
01:33:30.680 --> 01:33:36.319
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, I think when Orthodox saints and

1541
01:33:36.359 --> 01:33:37.319
<v Speaker 4>elder's comments on.

1542
01:33:37.279 --> 01:33:40.239
<v Speaker 3>This, they talk about it like, Okay, yeah, you.

1543
01:33:40.279 --> 01:33:46.600
<v Speaker 4>Might be opening your you know, noetic faculties to the

1544
01:33:46.640 --> 01:33:49.640
<v Speaker 4>spiritual realm when you do that, but that doesn't mean

1545
01:33:49.640 --> 01:33:51.680
<v Speaker 4>that you're ready for the spiritual realm, and that doesn't

1546
01:33:51.680 --> 01:33:57.159
<v Speaker 4>mean that it's the approved method for looking into the

1547
01:33:57.199 --> 01:34:00.239
<v Speaker 4>spiritual realm either, which is why it can, you know,

1548
01:34:00.319 --> 01:34:04.079
<v Speaker 4>terrify you and drive you insane. I'm not saying that everybody.

1549
01:34:04.119 --> 01:34:06.560
<v Speaker 4>I've done hallucinogen, so I'm well aware of how it works,

1550
01:34:06.880 --> 01:34:09.479
<v Speaker 4>and not everybody who trips goes insane. But it's sort

1551
01:34:09.479 --> 01:34:12.119
<v Speaker 4>of like, I don't know, it's like playing spiritual roulette

1552
01:34:12.199 --> 01:34:14.920
<v Speaker 4>or something like you could go and say, Henry, what's up?

1553
01:34:26.119 --> 01:34:41.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, seth, good, Yes.

1554
01:34:43.079 --> 01:34:44.560
<v Speaker 32>I've got a question.

1555
01:34:46.119 --> 01:34:50.520
<v Speaker 46>So I'm I'm kind of a person, but I'm like

1556
01:34:51.359 --> 01:34:54.960
<v Speaker 46>ninety percent of my way to deciding to become an

1557
01:34:54.960 --> 01:34:55.840
<v Speaker 46>Eastern Orthodox.

1558
01:34:56.600 --> 01:34:58.159
<v Speaker 32>But I have a question about ikons.

1559
01:35:00.279 --> 01:35:09.479
<v Speaker 46>Sure, I mean, so it's explained as windows to the divine, right, Yeah,

1560
01:35:09.520 --> 01:35:13.640
<v Speaker 46>but I'm curious as to like, what do they reveal

1561
01:35:13.800 --> 01:35:15.680
<v Speaker 46>that scripture doesn't.

1562
01:35:18.520 --> 01:35:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're essentially the same type of revelation as scriptures,

1563
01:35:21.880 --> 01:35:25.880
<v Speaker 4>So in a sense, what they reveal that scripture doesn't

1564
01:35:25.920 --> 01:35:29.640
<v Speaker 4>would be the facts and the history and the lives

1565
01:35:29.640 --> 01:35:32.159
<v Speaker 4>of the saints who lived after the scriptures.

1566
01:35:32.159 --> 01:35:34.239
<v Speaker 3>So that's one thing they reveal.

1567
01:35:34.279 --> 01:35:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Gregory Poulomas is a saint and he's not

1568
01:35:36.560 --> 01:35:39.319
<v Speaker 4>in the Bible, So it reveals to us things about

1569
01:35:39.359 --> 01:35:40.239
<v Speaker 4>saints after.

1570
01:35:40.199 --> 01:35:41.319
<v Speaker 3>The time of the apostles.

1571
01:35:41.960 --> 01:35:45.039
<v Speaker 4>Even the icons that are, you know, scenes of even

1572
01:35:45.039 --> 01:35:48.439
<v Speaker 4>the icons that are the scenes of like biblical imagery,

1573
01:35:48.560 --> 01:35:52.119
<v Speaker 4>like the the Theophany or christ Baptism. I mean, those

1574
01:35:52.319 --> 01:35:56.399
<v Speaker 4>icons are the same messages and meaning of the Bible.

1575
01:35:56.439 --> 01:35:59.600
<v Speaker 4>It's just a different medium or firm because written texts

1576
01:36:00.159 --> 01:36:02.359
<v Speaker 4>are not the only way in which God speaks to us.

1577
01:36:02.399 --> 01:36:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Because God created the beauty of the natural world. God

1578
01:36:05.960 --> 01:36:09.119
<v Speaker 4>wanted his Temple in Jerusalem to be beautiful and full

1579
01:36:09.159 --> 01:36:14.560
<v Speaker 4>of iconography, and so God is just also fine with

1580
01:36:14.760 --> 01:36:19.039
<v Speaker 4>revealing himself and truths about himself and his people through

1581
01:36:19.319 --> 01:36:23.199
<v Speaker 4>icons and through beauty and not just through written texts.

1582
01:36:23.279 --> 01:36:28.520
<v Speaker 46>Yeah, and I know icon veneration is quite like it's

1583
01:36:28.560 --> 01:36:36.680
<v Speaker 46>a big thing. But besides polycarphs like bones that could

1584
01:36:36.720 --> 01:36:41.760
<v Speaker 46>be considered venerated, like what other examples like in the

1585
01:36:41.880 --> 01:36:43.760
<v Speaker 46>early days would they be?

1586
01:36:46.039 --> 01:36:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Well?

1587
01:36:46.319 --> 01:36:50.039
<v Speaker 4>For example, all the early churches, even in the catacombs,

1588
01:36:50.039 --> 01:36:51.399
<v Speaker 4>have altars and had.

1589
01:36:51.279 --> 01:36:52.840
<v Speaker 3>The eucharists on the altars.

1590
01:36:52.840 --> 01:36:54.920
<v Speaker 4>So if you go to the catacombs in Rome, you'll

1591
01:36:54.960 --> 01:36:58.880
<v Speaker 4>see the altars when the church was persecuted down in

1592
01:36:59.079 --> 01:37:02.840
<v Speaker 4>the catacomb, and even when the basilicas began to be

1593
01:37:02.920 --> 01:37:08.640
<v Speaker 4>converted after Roman, after Catholicism was no longer persecuted. The basilicas,

1594
01:37:08.680 --> 01:37:12.439
<v Speaker 4>which are houses like fancy houses that you know senators

1595
01:37:12.439 --> 01:37:16.439
<v Speaker 4>and elite Roman you know senators used to live in

1596
01:37:16.520 --> 01:37:19.720
<v Speaker 4>or whatever like, when they converted the houses into churches,

1597
01:37:19.760 --> 01:37:24.000
<v Speaker 4>they would set up barriers or communion rails, which means

1598
01:37:24.039 --> 01:37:26.199
<v Speaker 4>that not everybody had access to the eucharists. So that

1599
01:37:26.239 --> 01:37:28.920
<v Speaker 4>itself tells you that there's a reverence for the euchrost itself.

1600
01:37:28.960 --> 01:37:33.640
<v Speaker 4>So the Eucharist is the icon part excellence that Protestants

1601
01:37:34.279 --> 01:37:38.039
<v Speaker 4>and people who you know, criticize this point always missed.

1602
01:37:38.039 --> 01:37:40.600
<v Speaker 4>They don't understand, well, the euchroust itself is that, but

1603
01:37:40.680 --> 01:37:43.880
<v Speaker 4>the altar itself is holy, and the altar itself is

1604
01:37:43.920 --> 01:37:47.359
<v Speaker 4>what became a tradition for the Church to put relics in.

1605
01:37:47.840 --> 01:37:50.199
<v Speaker 4>So this is an ancient, you know, early church tradition

1606
01:37:50.319 --> 01:37:54.880
<v Speaker 4>to put relics in the altar. And then the cross

1607
01:37:55.159 --> 01:37:58.119
<v Speaker 4>quite naturally became something that was venerated very early in

1608
01:37:58.159 --> 01:38:01.760
<v Speaker 4>the church. The monastics were doing the sign of the

1609
01:38:01.760 --> 01:38:05.119
<v Speaker 4>Cross very early in church tradition. So all of these

1610
01:38:05.119 --> 01:38:11.960
<v Speaker 4>things show the principle, including holy water two of sacramental theology,

1611
01:38:12.079 --> 01:38:15.199
<v Speaker 4>which is the very point and the purpose behind iconography.

1612
01:38:15.760 --> 01:38:17.760
<v Speaker 4>So people miss all of that and they don't even

1613
01:38:17.760 --> 01:38:20.119
<v Speaker 4>look at It's.

1614
01:38:19.920 --> 01:38:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Like, well, howk them.

1615
01:38:20.680 --> 01:38:24.359
<v Speaker 4>There weren't giant icons put up everywhere in the second

1616
01:38:24.399 --> 01:38:27.680
<v Speaker 4>third century. You mean, because the church was in the catacombs.

1617
01:38:28.039 --> 01:38:30.880
<v Speaker 4>But guess what, when you go on the catacombs, there's imagery.

1618
01:38:31.880 --> 01:38:33.840
<v Speaker 4>I've been to the catacombs in Rome, and I've only

1619
01:38:33.840 --> 01:38:37.039
<v Speaker 4>been to one of them there everywhere, and they have imagery,

1620
01:38:37.479 --> 01:38:39.600
<v Speaker 4>so they have pictures of Jesus, they have pictures of

1621
01:38:40.039 --> 01:38:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Bible scenes. If you go to the Dura Europo Synagogue,

1622
01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:48.039
<v Speaker 4>it has images and iconography everywhere on the walls.

1623
01:38:48.920 --> 01:38:51.159
<v Speaker 32>Okay, cool, thanks, that's so logic.

1624
01:38:53.439 --> 01:38:53.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1625
01:38:53.640 --> 01:38:55.359
<v Speaker 4>I have a video where I discussed this, and I

1626
01:38:55.359 --> 01:38:59.239
<v Speaker 4>actually go into a Protestant liturgical historian, Hugh Wiber's book

1627
01:38:59.239 --> 01:39:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Byzantine Liturgy. The first chapter of that book refutes all

1628
01:39:03.600 --> 01:39:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the Gavin Ortland stuff and the James White stuff. I've

1629
01:39:06.800 --> 01:39:10.720
<v Speaker 4>shared that probably twenty times on Twitter. Go watch my

1630
01:39:10.840 --> 01:39:14.960
<v Speaker 4>video that's like twenty minutes refuting Gavin Ortland on icons.

1631
01:39:14.960 --> 01:39:17.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's like a twenty minute video. All I

1632
01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:20.560
<v Speaker 4>do is cite Protestant liturgical historians. So I don't know

1633
01:39:20.560 --> 01:39:24.720
<v Speaker 4>why I'm not dissing you. It's just like it's like

1634
01:39:24.800 --> 01:39:25.199
<v Speaker 4>the same.

1635
01:39:25.359 --> 01:39:30.600
<v Speaker 3>This is like stuff like kicks up for whatever reason.

1636
01:39:30.920 --> 01:39:33.840
<v Speaker 4>And if people are like, oh, everybody's arguing over something

1637
01:39:33.880 --> 01:39:38.960
<v Speaker 4>that we've been making videos about for like seven years.

1638
01:39:38.039 --> 01:39:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Like go watch all the videos already made on this Darius.

1639
01:39:40.800 --> 01:39:41.239
<v Speaker 3>What's up?

1640
01:39:43.279 --> 01:39:45.560
<v Speaker 4>In fact, maybe I can find that video and put

1641
01:39:45.560 --> 01:39:48.079
<v Speaker 4>it underneath this for you guys, because I know everyone

1642
01:39:48.159 --> 01:39:52.600
<v Speaker 4>is too lazy to actually find a video. No one

1643
01:39:52.640 --> 01:39:56.000
<v Speaker 4>knows how to use search functions anymore. So it's about

1644
01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:58.079
<v Speaker 4>the fourth one that comes up when I search for it.

1645
01:39:58.119 --> 01:39:59.840
<v Speaker 4>So I'm gonna put it under here for you guys.

1646
01:40:00.600 --> 01:40:07.159
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, did it my churn? Yes, sir.

1647
01:40:07.920 --> 01:40:10.199
<v Speaker 25>Oh, hey, mister Dyer. I just want to say I

1648
01:40:10.239 --> 01:40:13.680
<v Speaker 25>appreciate you and your your work. It's been very helpful.

1649
01:40:13.760 --> 01:40:17.680
<v Speaker 25>My friend has helped me converting to decent Orthodoxy. I

1650
01:40:17.720 --> 01:40:20.520
<v Speaker 25>actually graduated from Master's University, and I've had a lot

1651
01:40:20.520 --> 01:40:25.920
<v Speaker 25>of questions and I actually asked John MacArthur at a

1652
01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:29.119
<v Speaker 25>Q and A myself, which is, I'll give you permission

1653
01:40:29.199 --> 01:40:33.199
<v Speaker 25>to uh not permission to call me on the video

1654
01:40:33.239 --> 01:40:35.039
<v Speaker 25>at a Q and A about the Master dem Nada.

1655
01:40:35.960 --> 01:40:38.359
<v Speaker 25>So there's a video of it. I don't know if

1656
01:40:38.359 --> 01:40:40.399
<v Speaker 25>you can d M me or something. I can't send

1657
01:40:40.439 --> 01:40:46.319
<v Speaker 25>you the link, but I wanted to ask more about

1658
01:40:46.439 --> 01:40:52.239
<v Speaker 25>the the Nestorianism with the mass uh maskedev nada. I

1659
01:40:52.239 --> 01:40:55.479
<v Speaker 25>think that's how you pronounce it. I'm having.

1660
01:40:56.840 --> 01:40:57.479
<v Speaker 3>Notorianism.

1661
01:40:58.399 --> 01:41:01.520
<v Speaker 25>Yeah, yeah, I've watched I've watched videos, a lot of them.

1662
01:41:01.560 --> 01:41:03.720
<v Speaker 25>I watched all of them, but I'm still having trouble

1663
01:41:04.319 --> 01:41:10.279
<v Speaker 25>like understanding it are like the has to put it

1664
01:41:10.279 --> 01:41:11.760
<v Speaker 25>in my own words of.

1665
01:41:12.640 --> 01:41:15.279
<v Speaker 4>Wow, okay, hold on, hold on, So let's let's distinguish

1666
01:41:15.359 --> 01:41:15.720
<v Speaker 4>some things.

1667
01:41:15.720 --> 01:41:17.560
<v Speaker 3>So can you mute? It's really loud, so just meet

1668
01:41:17.560 --> 01:41:22.359
<v Speaker 3>for a second. Oh, I apologize, It's okay, it's me

1669
01:41:22.479 --> 01:41:26.399
<v Speaker 3>for a second. Okay.

1670
01:41:26.479 --> 01:41:31.000
<v Speaker 4>So mass Damnata is an Augustinian teaching based on his

1671
01:41:31.119 --> 01:41:35.000
<v Speaker 4>reading of Romans five, that all human beings are in

1672
01:41:35.159 --> 01:41:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Adam as in an archetype. He speaks of this explicitly,

1673
01:41:38.840 --> 01:41:41.680
<v Speaker 4>for example, in the City of God. I've lectured through

1674
01:41:41.680 --> 01:41:43.479
<v Speaker 4>the entirety of the City of God and we covered

1675
01:41:43.479 --> 01:41:44.960
<v Speaker 4>the sections where he talks about this.

1676
01:41:45.640 --> 01:41:47.680
<v Speaker 3>The idea is that basically.

1677
01:41:47.479 --> 01:41:50.039
<v Speaker 4>We all not only send in Adam, but we were

1678
01:41:50.039 --> 01:41:53.199
<v Speaker 4>also guilty in Adam because we were in his loins

1679
01:41:53.239 --> 01:41:55.520
<v Speaker 4>as in an archetype, in him, like in a kind

1680
01:41:55.520 --> 01:41:58.840
<v Speaker 4>of neoplatonic way. So that means that when an infant

1681
01:41:58.880 --> 01:42:01.560
<v Speaker 4>is born or from sect from the second of conception,

1682
01:42:02.199 --> 01:42:04.479
<v Speaker 4>the infant is not only liable to the effects of

1683
01:42:04.520 --> 01:42:07.800
<v Speaker 4>original sin, he's also guilty of original sin and thus

1684
01:42:07.960 --> 01:42:11.760
<v Speaker 4>liable to full on damnation and torments.

1685
01:42:12.199 --> 01:42:13.960
<v Speaker 3>So that's what mass damnotomys.

1686
01:42:14.239 --> 01:42:16.840
<v Speaker 4>And the only people who get out of that in

1687
01:42:16.880 --> 01:42:20.920
<v Speaker 4>the Augustinian system are those who are not just predestined,

1688
01:42:20.960 --> 01:42:24.079
<v Speaker 4>but in this life come to the church, come to

1689
01:42:24.119 --> 01:42:29.399
<v Speaker 4>the font, get baptized, and persevere until the end, and

1690
01:42:29.439 --> 01:42:31.880
<v Speaker 4>thus demonstrate that they were one of the elects. So

1691
01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:34.319
<v Speaker 4>you have that's why he wrote a treatise called on

1692
01:42:34.399 --> 01:42:38.000
<v Speaker 4>the Gift of Perseverance. But he also wrote other books

1693
01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:41.399
<v Speaker 4>on operative and cooperative grace, et cetera, none of which

1694
01:42:42.159 --> 01:42:45.560
<v Speaker 4>is consistent with the Calvinist teaching, because Augustine did not

1695
01:42:45.600 --> 01:42:48.840
<v Speaker 4>believe ultimately in an invisible church. He believed that the

1696
01:42:48.920 --> 01:42:52.960
<v Speaker 4>visible church has a visible structure that is unified, it

1697
01:42:53.039 --> 01:42:56.800
<v Speaker 4>is singular, it has the means of grace alone through

1698
01:42:56.920 --> 01:43:00.760
<v Speaker 4>the sacraments. He believed in praying for dead, He believed

1699
01:43:00.760 --> 01:43:02.840
<v Speaker 4>in all the things that we believe. He doesn't believe

1700
01:43:02.880 --> 01:43:06.079
<v Speaker 4>the things that the Calvinists believe, So that's mass damnata.

1701
01:43:06.239 --> 01:43:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Nasaurianism is a different situation where the patriarchal Constantinople started

1702
01:43:12.960 --> 01:43:16.439
<v Speaker 4>teaching that Mary is not the mother of God, meaning

1703
01:43:16.479 --> 01:43:18.279
<v Speaker 4>that the person that she gave birth to was not

1704
01:43:18.880 --> 01:43:21.119
<v Speaker 4>the divine person of the word, the second person of

1705
01:43:21.119 --> 01:43:24.760
<v Speaker 4>the Godhead, but rather that there's a dual subject going

1706
01:43:24.800 --> 01:43:27.920
<v Speaker 4>on in the life of Christ, where at times it

1707
01:43:28.039 --> 01:43:31.840
<v Speaker 4>is the subject Jesus of Nazareth, who's a human subject,

1708
01:43:32.079 --> 01:43:34.479
<v Speaker 4>and at other times it's the second person that God had,

1709
01:43:34.520 --> 01:43:37.800
<v Speaker 4>the logos, who is speaking and revealing himself in the gospels.

1710
01:43:38.119 --> 01:43:41.760
<v Speaker 4>And so when Nastorius is condemned at Ephesus, he's condemned

1711
01:43:41.840 --> 01:43:47.199
<v Speaker 4>for a dual subject Christology, that saying Cyril writes about extensively.

1712
01:43:47.479 --> 01:43:49.520
<v Speaker 4>So those are two separate topics, but I'm happy to

1713
01:43:49.560 --> 01:43:50.439
<v Speaker 4>address either one.

1714
01:43:52.319 --> 01:43:53.720
<v Speaker 25>I appreciate that, brother, Thank you.

1715
01:43:56.840 --> 01:43:59.880
<v Speaker 3>So what was the question about mass Dunn and John MacArthur.

1716
01:44:00.239 --> 01:44:03.560
<v Speaker 25>I was Oh, I asked him. Uh, I asked him

1717
01:44:04.520 --> 01:44:08.039
<v Speaker 25>back in twenty twenty one. I went to the pulpit,

1718
01:44:08.399 --> 01:44:11.199
<v Speaker 25>you know, because I grew up not reform, but whatever.

1719
01:44:11.279 --> 01:44:14.359
<v Speaker 25>I asked him, was there a break in the trinity?

1720
01:44:14.600 --> 01:44:18.800
<v Speaker 25>Because you know, you just said, Father, Father, why have

1721
01:44:18.920 --> 01:44:21.600
<v Speaker 25>you forsaken me? And I was expressing and I asked

1722
01:44:21.640 --> 01:44:25.039
<v Speaker 25>him like, how wasn't there a break because it seems

1723
01:44:25.159 --> 01:44:29.319
<v Speaker 25>like it and in the video, I don't know. You

1724
01:44:29.399 --> 01:44:32.600
<v Speaker 25>can go to my Facebook or something like that if

1725
01:44:32.640 --> 01:44:35.760
<v Speaker 25>you search up my name. In the video, he says

1726
01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:40.039
<v Speaker 25>basically that yes, there was a separation.

1727
01:44:40.359 --> 01:44:43.079
<v Speaker 3>And then wow, that's awesome. Find that.

1728
01:44:43.600 --> 01:44:46.720
<v Speaker 25>So yeah, if you I don't know, can you DM

1729
01:44:46.880 --> 01:44:48.720
<v Speaker 25>on Twitter or something, I can give it to you.

1730
01:44:49.000 --> 01:44:51.479
<v Speaker 4>Well, why don't you just post it underneath this thread here,

1731
01:44:51.560 --> 01:44:54.760
<v Speaker 4>put it as a comment and I'll play that on

1732
01:44:54.840 --> 01:44:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the live stream or something. But yeah, that's different. So

1733
01:44:57.880 --> 01:45:01.279
<v Speaker 4>mauth da'maa is the Augustinian doctrine. The argument that I

1734
01:45:01.359 --> 01:45:06.279
<v Speaker 4>make about penal substitutionary atonement is that the Classical Reformation tradition,

1735
01:45:06.439 --> 01:45:09.520
<v Speaker 4>when they interpret the text my God, My God, why

1736
01:45:09.560 --> 01:45:12.680
<v Speaker 4>have you forsaken me? All the Classical Reformers believe that

1737
01:45:13.000 --> 01:45:17.560
<v Speaker 4>Jesus of Nazareth was damned on the cross, and so

1738
01:45:17.640 --> 01:45:20.319
<v Speaker 4>if you believe he's a divine person, you split the

1739
01:45:20.359 --> 01:45:24.720
<v Speaker 4>trinity because damnation means a severance from the presence, love

1740
01:45:25.279 --> 01:45:28.760
<v Speaker 4>and unity of God and divine life. So you're saying

1741
01:45:28.840 --> 01:45:31.039
<v Speaker 4>that the second person of the God had was severed

1742
01:45:31.119 --> 01:45:35.239
<v Speaker 4>from the divine love, unity and presence of the Father,

1743
01:45:35.600 --> 01:45:40.159
<v Speaker 4>which is impossible. It's anti Trinitarians stupid, But Calvinists don't

1744
01:45:40.159 --> 01:45:44.359
<v Speaker 4>care about Trinitarian theology. They'd rather do their steriology first,

1745
01:45:44.920 --> 01:45:46.359
<v Speaker 4>and if that screws up the.

1746
01:45:46.399 --> 01:45:48.399
<v Speaker 3>Trinity down the road, who cares? Right.

1747
01:45:49.079 --> 01:45:54.520
<v Speaker 4>But in the Orthodox position, seteriology is downstream from triadology.

1748
01:45:54.720 --> 01:45:56.560
<v Speaker 3>It's the other way around. It's the reverse.

1749
01:45:56.640 --> 01:45:58.560
<v Speaker 4>And that's why no Calvinists will ever be able to

1750
01:45:58.600 --> 01:46:01.640
<v Speaker 4>win a debate when it comes to the monarchical trinity

1751
01:46:01.800 --> 01:46:03.760
<v Speaker 4>versus their stupid heterodox trinity.

1752
01:46:04.840 --> 01:46:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Often. Hey j how are you fine with that?

1753
01:46:17.680 --> 01:46:17.840
<v Speaker 47>Hey?

1754
01:46:18.119 --> 01:46:20.880
<v Speaker 3>So, I just had a quick question about epistemology.

1755
01:46:21.920 --> 01:46:23.880
<v Speaker 48>From some of your videos I've watched, I've seen that

1756
01:46:23.960 --> 01:46:29.640
<v Speaker 48>you don't just allow claims, so you want epistemological justification

1757
01:46:29.840 --> 01:46:32.840
<v Speaker 48>for things. But also at the same time, i've heard

1758
01:46:32.920 --> 01:46:35.840
<v Speaker 48>you say, well a lot of claims kind of have

1759
01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:41.640
<v Speaker 48>at the base level, kind of like epistemological circularity.

1760
01:46:42.880 --> 01:46:45.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I literally just addressed this about twenty minutes ago.

1761
01:46:45.359 --> 01:46:51.199
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, okay, I'll tune back in. Fine, you can

1762
01:46:51.279 --> 01:46:53.479
<v Speaker 3>ask a question again, Go ahead, okay.

1763
01:46:53.600 --> 01:46:56.880
<v Speaker 48>So, like, if I wanted to say something like, well,

1764
01:46:56.960 --> 01:46:59.800
<v Speaker 48>I know I'm a conscious being, like there is consciousness,

1765
01:47:00.479 --> 01:47:03.359
<v Speaker 48>I mean I can't in your world. I want to

1766
01:47:03.399 --> 01:47:06.359
<v Speaker 48>be able to say that's self evident. And if not, like,

1767
01:47:06.479 --> 01:47:09.199
<v Speaker 48>how would I justify something like that.

1768
01:47:11.720 --> 01:47:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, So, I mean, the first point is that anybody

1769
01:47:14.680 --> 01:47:20.600
<v Speaker 4>who doesn't want to believe in recursive, you know, paradigm

1770
01:47:20.760 --> 01:47:24.119
<v Speaker 4>level questions being self referencing, they're going to, most likely

1771
01:47:24.239 --> 01:47:25.800
<v Speaker 4>ninety nine percent of the time they're going to be

1772
01:47:26.079 --> 01:47:29.920
<v Speaker 4>some form of foundationalist in terms of epistemology. And if

1773
01:47:29.960 --> 01:47:33.520
<v Speaker 4>you're a foundationalist, you're gonna have to deal with their

1774
01:47:33.600 --> 01:47:36.600
<v Speaker 4>criterion problem. You're gonna have to deal with how we

1775
01:47:36.800 --> 01:47:39.359
<v Speaker 4>know what's self evident and why is that self evident?

1776
01:47:39.399 --> 01:47:43.159
<v Speaker 4>Which is going to rely on some prior principle that

1777
01:47:43.520 --> 01:47:46.680
<v Speaker 4>susses out the non self evident from the self evident.

1778
01:47:47.119 --> 01:47:48.680
<v Speaker 3>And if the self evident things.

1779
01:47:48.520 --> 01:47:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Rely on a principle which teases out the self evident

1780
01:47:52.039 --> 01:47:54.720
<v Speaker 4>and non self evident, then it's no longer self evident

1781
01:47:54.760 --> 01:47:58.199
<v Speaker 4>because it's relying on another principle because by definition, self

1782
01:47:58.239 --> 01:48:01.439
<v Speaker 4>evident principles can't rely on other truths or other things.

1783
01:48:01.840 --> 01:48:03.800
<v Speaker 4>If you watch the Trent Horn debate, the whole debate

1784
01:48:03.880 --> 01:48:07.079
<v Speaker 4>ended up being about things that were self evident. So yeah,

1785
01:48:07.119 --> 01:48:09.159
<v Speaker 4>so a person who disagreed with tag or the way

1786
01:48:09.199 --> 01:48:11.920
<v Speaker 4>that we approach epistemology, they could go in the direction

1787
01:48:12.159 --> 01:48:15.840
<v Speaker 4>of denying that all world views are at a fundamental

1788
01:48:15.960 --> 01:48:19.039
<v Speaker 4>level self referencing or recursive. But they're in an even

1789
01:48:19.159 --> 01:48:23.199
<v Speaker 4>more difficult box if they do that, because now they're

1790
01:48:23.239 --> 01:48:25.199
<v Speaker 4>going to have to give an account for the criterion

1791
01:48:25.319 --> 01:48:28.920
<v Speaker 4>problem and the principles of self evidence, which is.

1792
01:48:28.920 --> 01:48:30.039
<v Speaker 3>Going to be a nightmer.

1793
01:48:31.760 --> 01:48:34.159
<v Speaker 48>Okay, thank you, I'll go back and I'll watch the

1794
01:48:34.199 --> 01:48:36.880
<v Speaker 48>Trent Horn debate, and then as so, what was your.

1795
01:48:36.840 --> 01:48:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Question about consciousness? Like what was it? So you just

1796
01:48:39.960 --> 01:48:41.279
<v Speaker 3>you're just repeating the cards that you.

1797
01:48:41.319 --> 01:48:44.079
<v Speaker 48>Mean, Well, no, it wouldn't be because I watched you

1798
01:48:44.600 --> 01:48:47.079
<v Speaker 48>debate te Dump, and I remember te Dump wanted to

1799
01:48:47.159 --> 01:48:49.840
<v Speaker 48>do the whole cartesian I think therefore I am.

1800
01:48:50.359 --> 01:48:53.159
<v Speaker 3>But you put into question that Trent Horn did the

1801
01:48:53.199 --> 01:48:53.600
<v Speaker 3>same thing.

1802
01:48:55.239 --> 01:48:57.239
<v Speaker 48>I didn't watch the Trent Horn, but I remember what

1803
01:48:57.359 --> 01:48:59.439
<v Speaker 48>you you brought up with Tea Dump is that hey,

1804
01:48:59.600 --> 01:49:04.479
<v Speaker 48>Bertrand Russell has a critique of the coquito, which is like,

1805
01:49:04.640 --> 01:49:08.319
<v Speaker 48>there's a jump to a being or an eye, but nonetheless,

1806
01:49:08.520 --> 01:49:11.920
<v Speaker 48>like Corre, I do think there there there is not

1807
01:49:12.079 --> 01:49:16.479
<v Speaker 48>necessarily an eye, but there is experience. And if I

1808
01:49:16.560 --> 01:49:20.239
<v Speaker 48>wanted to justify that experience, can I say that it's

1809
01:49:20.279 --> 01:49:22.399
<v Speaker 48>self evident or what I need to be more.

1810
01:49:22.479 --> 01:49:24.359
<v Speaker 4>I'll just cut it. I'll just cut it out. Even

1811
01:49:24.399 --> 01:49:27.520
<v Speaker 4>easier and even better than version of Russell's critique. If

1812
01:49:27.560 --> 01:49:29.880
<v Speaker 4>you look at cons critique of the coke e toe,

1813
01:49:30.479 --> 01:49:33.520
<v Speaker 4>he says, if you say I think therefore I am,

1814
01:49:34.359 --> 01:49:37.640
<v Speaker 4>I am, or I exist, that's a time determination.

1815
01:49:38.359 --> 01:49:40.039
<v Speaker 3>You have not proven time yet.

1816
01:49:40.479 --> 01:49:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Your argument assumes the existence of time, and so therefore

1817
01:49:43.840 --> 01:49:46.479
<v Speaker 4>the cogito is not self evident. By the way, the

1818
01:49:46.520 --> 01:49:49.720
<v Speaker 4>coketo has been savage by philosophers ever since. They cart

1819
01:49:50.159 --> 01:49:52.439
<v Speaker 4>pointing out how it relies on all kinds of things,

1820
01:49:53.079 --> 01:49:56.039
<v Speaker 4>not just time, and not just the false non sequit

1821
01:49:56.119 --> 01:50:00.079
<v Speaker 4>or conclusions or eyes. But it also assumes sentences and

1822
01:50:00.159 --> 01:50:02.319
<v Speaker 4>propositional meaning, which it hasn't demonstrated yet.

1823
01:50:04.560 --> 01:50:09.479
<v Speaker 48>Interesting, So, I mean, is there not necessarily proving an

1824
01:50:09.560 --> 01:50:11.920
<v Speaker 48>eye like an independent self? Is there a way to

1825
01:50:12.399 --> 01:50:17.760
<v Speaker 48>epistemologically kind of demonstrate that there is conscious experience outside

1826
01:50:17.760 --> 01:50:18.680
<v Speaker 48>of just saying well it's self.

1827
01:50:19.079 --> 01:50:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, I think the strongest argument is const argument

1828
01:50:21.720 --> 01:50:25.239
<v Speaker 4>that it's a transcendental category, which he calls the unity

1829
01:50:25.239 --> 01:50:27.640
<v Speaker 4>of apperception, which is the self for the knower I mean,

1830
01:50:27.720 --> 01:50:30.880
<v Speaker 4>in other words, for the possibility of perception, you have

1831
01:50:30.960 --> 01:50:32.720
<v Speaker 4>to have a nowherre or self. But that would be

1832
01:50:32.760 --> 01:50:36.199
<v Speaker 4>a transcendental argument, that would not be a Kantian self

1833
01:50:36.239 --> 01:50:37.439
<v Speaker 4>evident axiom.

1834
01:50:38.600 --> 01:50:41.920
<v Speaker 48>And that's the unity of ap ap procession.

1835
01:50:42.039 --> 01:50:44.000
<v Speaker 3>You said ap perception.

1836
01:50:44.159 --> 01:50:48.680
<v Speaker 4>That's just Kant's famous terminology for a unified experience that

1837
01:50:48.840 --> 01:50:51.760
<v Speaker 4>a self or a knower is having. So basically, Kant

1838
01:50:51.920 --> 01:50:54.520
<v Speaker 4>is just saying that in order to have a meaningful world,

1839
01:50:54.640 --> 01:50:58.359
<v Speaker 4>or a meaningful life, or a meaningful experience, there must

1840
01:50:58.439 --> 01:51:04.880
<v Speaker 4>be some unifying thing or substrate that is connecting all

1841
01:51:04.920 --> 01:51:09.079
<v Speaker 4>of these disparate experiences in your daily life. And so

1842
01:51:09.399 --> 01:51:11.840
<v Speaker 4>for that to be the case, it's obviously not going

1843
01:51:11.920 --> 01:51:15.520
<v Speaker 4>to be proven in since experience since it's not under

1844
01:51:15.880 --> 01:51:17.319
<v Speaker 4>the purview of since experience.

1845
01:51:17.920 --> 01:51:19.319
<v Speaker 3>So where is it? How is it? How wo do

1846
01:51:19.439 --> 01:51:19.720
<v Speaker 3>we know it?

1847
01:51:19.840 --> 01:51:21.800
<v Speaker 4>It's a perfect example of one of the things that

1848
01:51:22.439 --> 01:51:26.199
<v Speaker 4>calls a transcendental category, which is assumed in any act

1849
01:51:26.279 --> 01:51:29.960
<v Speaker 4>of knowing. So to have a meaningful experience presupposes a

1850
01:51:30.199 --> 01:51:33.640
<v Speaker 4>what he calls a transcendental unity of a perception. That's

1851
01:51:33.720 --> 01:51:37.319
<v Speaker 4>just fancy word for a conscious mind of self a knowwhere.

1852
01:51:38.880 --> 01:51:41.520
<v Speaker 48>Okay, cool, Yeah, I'm going to look into that. It's

1853
01:51:41.560 --> 01:51:44.680
<v Speaker 48>something I've been thinking about a lot. And then after this,

1854
01:51:45.119 --> 01:51:48.760
<v Speaker 48>like little chat log is closed. Can I go back

1855
01:51:48.800 --> 01:51:50.159
<v Speaker 48>on Twitter and like rewind it?

1856
01:51:50.600 --> 01:51:50.760
<v Speaker 26>Just so?

1857
01:51:52.600 --> 01:51:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

1858
01:51:53.039 --> 01:51:53.279
<v Speaker 44>Cool?

1859
01:51:53.359 --> 01:51:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you so much. Jay. I appreciate that question.

1860
01:51:56.399 --> 01:52:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate those are good questions. Andre. What's up man, Colin?

1861
01:52:28.039 --> 01:52:33.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm you, Hey, Jay, what's up? Man?

1862
01:52:34.039 --> 01:52:34.199
<v Speaker 44>Yeah?

1863
01:52:34.279 --> 01:52:36.760
<v Speaker 49>Go ahead, Hey dude, I had a quick question for you.

1864
01:52:37.079 --> 01:52:39.359
<v Speaker 49>It might be fairly simple, but I was thinking about

1865
01:52:39.399 --> 01:52:42.720
<v Speaker 49>this the other day. Could you elaborate on the Orthodox

1866
01:52:43.239 --> 01:52:48.000
<v Speaker 49>perspective on who Melchizedek is in Genesis fourteen?

1867
01:52:48.720 --> 01:52:48.880
<v Speaker 48>Is he?

1868
01:52:49.640 --> 01:52:51.960
<v Speaker 3>I wrote a buff back article on it.

1869
01:52:52.880 --> 01:52:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, okay, cool, I'm just beating it because it's loud,

1870
01:52:57.479 --> 01:53:02.239
<v Speaker 4>but I appreciate your out of the mouth of babes. Yeah,

1871
01:53:02.239 --> 01:53:06.199
<v Speaker 4>Melchizedek is an actual Old Testament person.

1872
01:53:06.319 --> 01:53:10.960
<v Speaker 3>He's not Jesus. He's a type of Jesus, and he

1873
01:53:11.159 --> 01:53:16.439
<v Speaker 3>is spoken of as the King of Salem.

1874
01:53:16.640 --> 01:53:18.760
<v Speaker 4>He's a priest king of Salem, which makes him a

1875
01:53:18.800 --> 01:53:20.880
<v Speaker 4>type of Christ, being the ultimate priest king.

1876
01:53:25.000 --> 01:53:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we should I'm sorry, We're trying to park and

1877
01:53:32.239 --> 01:53:34.800
<v Speaker 3>it's like bad traffic here, so I keep getting distracted.

1878
01:53:36.199 --> 01:53:39.359
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, he was actually the king of Jerusalem, because

1879
01:53:39.399 --> 01:53:42.319
<v Speaker 4>Salem is Zion, David explains in the Psalms.

1880
01:53:43.039 --> 01:53:46.039
<v Speaker 3>And so what this means is that if you believe Genesis,

1881
01:53:46.119 --> 01:53:53.239
<v Speaker 3>then it's telling you that uh Salem or the city

1882
01:53:53.279 --> 01:53:56.600
<v Speaker 3>of Zion, was actually the city of the righteous before

1883
01:53:56.800 --> 01:53:57.520
<v Speaker 3>the Jews.

1884
01:53:57.359 --> 01:54:00.319
<v Speaker 4>Existed in the sense of Abraham. So Abraham is beginning

1885
01:54:00.359 --> 01:54:03.119
<v Speaker 4>of quote Judaism because he's the first to.

1886
01:54:03.199 --> 01:54:04.279
<v Speaker 3>Be called in that way.

1887
01:54:06.239 --> 01:54:09.319
<v Speaker 4>And God calls Abraham not because no one else in

1888
01:54:09.359 --> 01:54:12.840
<v Speaker 4>the world believed in God, but rather Abraham goes to

1889
01:54:13.600 --> 01:54:19.199
<v Speaker 4>the righteous gentile priest king Malchisedek and ties to him,

1890
01:54:19.920 --> 01:54:23.239
<v Speaker 4>which shows the superiority of the Melchizedekian priesthood over the

1891
01:54:23.359 --> 01:54:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Ironic And this is why in Hebrew seven Paul uses

1892
01:54:26.840 --> 01:54:30.359
<v Speaker 4>this as a powerful argument for the superiority of Christianity,

1893
01:54:30.399 --> 01:54:33.960
<v Speaker 4>which is the Melchizedekian priesthood amongst its bishops, priests.

1894
01:54:33.680 --> 01:54:34.199
<v Speaker 3>And laity.

1895
01:54:35.199 --> 01:54:41.239
<v Speaker 4>That priesthood supersedes and transcends the ironic priesthood because it

1896
01:54:41.359 --> 01:54:46.359
<v Speaker 4>is superior, although even the ironic priesthood is also a

1897
01:54:46.520 --> 01:54:47.560
<v Speaker 4>type of christ.

1898
01:54:50.039 --> 01:55:25.720
<v Speaker 31>Joseph, go ahead, hey, Jack, you hear me?

1899
01:55:27.319 --> 01:55:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Hey.

1900
01:55:29.079 --> 01:55:30.960
<v Speaker 50>First of all, I want to say I've been listening

1901
01:55:31.119 --> 01:55:34.359
<v Speaker 50>for a couple of years, and I love just the

1902
01:55:34.439 --> 01:55:37.359
<v Speaker 50>way you break things down and your movie your movie reviews,

1903
01:55:37.439 --> 01:55:40.199
<v Speaker 50>all that stuff. So I love your debates everything. I

1904
01:55:40.279 --> 01:55:43.720
<v Speaker 50>love everything there is. Yeah, no problem, no problem, it's

1905
01:55:43.760 --> 01:55:44.359
<v Speaker 50>really good stuff.

1906
01:55:46.319 --> 01:55:47.439
<v Speaker 8>Let me ask you. And I've heard you.

1907
01:55:47.680 --> 01:55:48.279
<v Speaker 3>I've heard you.

1908
01:55:50.079 --> 01:55:52.520
<v Speaker 50>With other people like if someone comes to you who's

1909
01:55:52.680 --> 01:55:56.000
<v Speaker 50>who comes from a partisant background, which it is more

1910
01:55:56.079 --> 01:55:59.880
<v Speaker 50>on solo sola scripture, and they want to debate you

1911
01:56:00.279 --> 01:56:04.079
<v Speaker 50>or have a discussion with you on the Bible, you

1912
01:56:04.239 --> 01:56:07.720
<v Speaker 50>kind of cut their legs off. And you I've heard

1913
01:56:07.800 --> 01:56:09.359
<v Speaker 50>you do this before. I don't know if you're still

1914
01:56:09.479 --> 01:56:11.560
<v Speaker 50>doing this. It's been a couple of months. As i've

1915
01:56:11.680 --> 01:56:14.279
<v Speaker 50>heard you, maybe you changed your augmentation, maybe, but I've

1916
01:56:14.319 --> 01:56:17.720
<v Speaker 50>heard you say things like, well, who brought the Bible?

1917
01:56:17.920 --> 01:56:20.319
<v Speaker 50>Who gave you the Bible? And that's kind of your

1918
01:56:20.359 --> 01:56:22.079
<v Speaker 50>way to cut the legs off.

1919
01:56:22.399 --> 01:56:24.319
<v Speaker 4>So I want to know I never see using that

1920
01:56:24.479 --> 01:56:27.159
<v Speaker 4>argument because it's a classic one as one of the

1921
01:56:27.199 --> 01:56:28.439
<v Speaker 4>ones that helped convert me.

1922
01:56:29.239 --> 01:56:31.720
<v Speaker 50>Now, okay, now, so my next question is because I

1923
01:56:31.800 --> 01:56:36.199
<v Speaker 50>have I feel like I have a response to that argument.

1924
01:56:36.279 --> 01:56:37.479
<v Speaker 50>So I want to see what you think I want

1925
01:56:37.520 --> 01:56:39.760
<v Speaker 50>to see what you're what your answer is? I guess

1926
01:56:40.199 --> 01:56:41.399
<v Speaker 50>so wouldn't that be?

1927
01:56:41.880 --> 01:56:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, that's fine.

1928
01:56:42.680 --> 01:56:45.319
<v Speaker 4>You can always bring you know, challenges and responses like that.

1929
01:56:45.560 --> 01:56:47.800
<v Speaker 4>But could you give me just a couple of minutes

1930
01:56:47.920 --> 01:56:50.479
<v Speaker 4>because I meant the gas station and I had to

1931
01:56:50.600 --> 01:56:52.520
<v Speaker 4>use the bathroom and I got to get a water.

1932
01:56:52.680 --> 01:56:55.920
<v Speaker 3>So can you hold on for maybe a minute or two? Yeah,

1933
01:56:55.960 --> 01:59:16.840
<v Speaker 3>so just give me a second? Okay, go ahead. Man,

1934
01:59:16.840 --> 01:59:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm back on the corner all right, so I think

1935
01:59:21.800 --> 01:59:24.560
<v Speaker 3>can you hear me? Yeah?

1936
01:59:24.960 --> 01:59:25.279
<v Speaker 5>All right?

1937
01:59:25.920 --> 01:59:28.920
<v Speaker 50>So, like I said before, when someone comes to you

1938
01:59:29.600 --> 01:59:32.079
<v Speaker 50>and it kind of wants to argue the debate what

1939
01:59:32.159 --> 01:59:34.680
<v Speaker 50>the Bible says before you you even get into that

1940
01:59:34.720 --> 01:59:36.560
<v Speaker 50>conversation with them, and you kind of try and cut

1941
01:59:36.600 --> 01:59:38.359
<v Speaker 50>their legs off from the beginning and say, well, who

1942
01:59:38.399 --> 01:59:39.079
<v Speaker 50>brought you the Bible?

1943
01:59:39.319 --> 01:59:40.600
<v Speaker 3>This and that X Y Z. Okay?

1944
01:59:40.640 --> 01:59:40.840
<v Speaker 5>Cool?

1945
01:59:41.079 --> 01:59:44.199
<v Speaker 50>And let me ask you, isn't isn't that? Isn't that

1946
01:59:44.399 --> 01:59:47.680
<v Speaker 50>technically committing the fallacy of composition where you're saying, okay,

1947
01:59:47.800 --> 01:59:51.760
<v Speaker 50>because the Orthodox Church brought this, that means they have

1948
01:59:51.880 --> 01:59:53.640
<v Speaker 50>the truth now and everything going forward.

1949
01:59:54.079 --> 01:59:54.840
<v Speaker 10>You see what I'm saying.

1950
01:59:55.239 --> 01:59:57.880
<v Speaker 50>Isn't that the fallacy of composition to assume that the

1951
01:59:58.000 --> 02:00:01.760
<v Speaker 50>Orthodox Church, just because they that God used them to

1952
02:00:01.840 --> 02:00:05.520
<v Speaker 50>bring the truth of scripture to everybody, that now that

1953
02:00:05.720 --> 02:00:08.479
<v Speaker 50>every teaching they have now is true.

1954
02:00:08.640 --> 02:00:12.439
<v Speaker 4>You to say what I'm saying, Well, no, the argument

1955
02:00:12.560 --> 02:00:18.359
<v Speaker 4>is not that because the Canon was put together by

1956
02:00:18.439 --> 02:00:21.319
<v Speaker 4>the Church that therefore everything that they believe or say

1957
02:00:21.359 --> 02:00:21.600
<v Speaker 4>is true.

1958
02:00:21.600 --> 02:00:23.079
<v Speaker 3>I don't. I don't even have to concede that.

1959
02:00:24.199 --> 02:00:27.159
<v Speaker 4>All I have to do is show that the Protestant

1960
02:00:27.279 --> 02:00:32.079
<v Speaker 4>epistemic grounds for knowing the Canon and trying to enforce

1961
02:00:32.199 --> 02:00:34.439
<v Speaker 4>the Canon doesn't work for Protestantism.

1962
02:00:37.199 --> 02:00:39.600
<v Speaker 3>In other words, and let me let me explain why

1963
02:00:39.680 --> 02:00:40.199
<v Speaker 3>that would be the.

1964
02:00:40.239 --> 02:00:43.039
<v Speaker 4>Case, because, for example, a Roman Catholic might make the

1965
02:00:43.119 --> 02:00:47.079
<v Speaker 4>same argument, right, so a Protestant. A Protestant might say

1966
02:00:47.119 --> 02:00:50.000
<v Speaker 4>back to me, well, okay, so maybe I admit that

1967
02:00:50.439 --> 02:00:54.479
<v Speaker 4>you know the church quote unquote of history is indispensable

1968
02:00:54.600 --> 02:00:59.680
<v Speaker 4>for the determination and knowledge and decision of the Canon.

1969
02:01:00.479 --> 02:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>But why Orthodoxy over Rome is ALSOSM. So no, I don't.

1970
02:01:03.920 --> 02:01:07.479
<v Speaker 4>I don't think the argument that argument alone necessarily proves orthodoxy,

1971
02:01:07.640 --> 02:01:10.600
<v Speaker 4>except that you have to go deeper into it and

1972
02:01:10.760 --> 02:01:14.720
<v Speaker 4>point out that, well, actually, the Roman Catholic arguments is

1973
02:01:14.840 --> 02:01:17.159
<v Speaker 4>not much better because they just argue that is whatever

1974
02:01:17.199 --> 02:01:20.520
<v Speaker 4>the pope decided at the Council of Rome under Pope Damasis.

1975
02:01:21.039 --> 02:01:23.079
<v Speaker 3>But that just assumes that papalism is true.

1976
02:01:24.119 --> 02:01:26.680
<v Speaker 4>The rest of the Church had a fluctuating and varying

1977
02:01:26.800 --> 02:01:29.560
<v Speaker 4>canon for centuries, even up into the Seventh Council.

1978
02:01:29.720 --> 02:01:31.680
<v Speaker 3>So I don't understand.

1979
02:01:31.920 --> 02:01:34.359
<v Speaker 4>So if that, if the church was papal, they weren't

1980
02:01:34.399 --> 02:01:37.079
<v Speaker 4>listening to Damasis about what the canon.

1981
02:01:37.000 --> 02:01:42.079
<v Speaker 3>Was, right, I see. So let's so let me ask

1982
02:01:42.119 --> 02:01:43.199
<v Speaker 3>you all I all.

1983
02:01:43.119 --> 02:01:43.560
<v Speaker 6>I need to do.

1984
02:01:43.720 --> 02:01:46.560
<v Speaker 4>All I have to do is just demonstrate that tradition

1985
02:01:47.560 --> 02:01:52.600
<v Speaker 4>and a living body of people with normative authority are

1986
02:01:52.680 --> 02:01:55.800
<v Speaker 4>absolutely necessary even to know what the written Word of

1987
02:01:55.840 --> 02:01:57.800
<v Speaker 4>God is, and that undercos Protestancy.

1988
02:01:58.640 --> 02:02:01.520
<v Speaker 50>So so okay, so this okay, So this is another

1989
02:02:01.720 --> 02:02:02.439
<v Speaker 50>question happening.

1990
02:02:02.479 --> 02:02:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

1991
02:02:02.800 --> 02:02:07.119
<v Speaker 50>So if if that's what orthodox theology is claiming, if

1992
02:02:07.159 --> 02:02:11.800
<v Speaker 50>the Bible says that the Holy Spirit is able to

1993
02:02:13.359 --> 02:02:15.479
<v Speaker 50>if we're able to come to the knowledge of God

1994
02:02:16.039 --> 02:02:21.039
<v Speaker 50>without the Orthodox Church proper, what doesn't that defeat that argument?

1995
02:02:21.079 --> 02:02:21.239
<v Speaker 30>Though?

1996
02:02:21.439 --> 02:02:24.199
<v Speaker 50>If I'm able to come to a lot of truth

1997
02:02:25.640 --> 02:02:28.159
<v Speaker 50>by reading the scriptures, just me alone with the Lord

1998
02:02:28.800 --> 02:02:32.159
<v Speaker 50>wouldn't that doesn't that undercut that argument then?

1999
02:02:32.680 --> 02:02:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Right?

2000
02:02:32.920 --> 02:02:36.119
<v Speaker 4>I say, we're saying, well, there's a difference in scripture

2001
02:02:36.199 --> 02:02:37.720
<v Speaker 4>between different types of knowledge.

2002
02:02:38.359 --> 02:02:41.319
<v Speaker 3>So for example, you can have rational.

2003
02:02:42.479 --> 02:02:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Diological knowledge of something, or you could have factual knowledge

2004
02:02:47.680 --> 02:02:51.000
<v Speaker 4>of something and not have intimate knowledge of the thing.

2005
02:02:51.119 --> 02:02:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Right.

2006
02:02:51.359 --> 02:02:53.319
<v Speaker 4>So like when the scriptures say that Adam and even

2007
02:02:53.359 --> 02:02:56.079
<v Speaker 4>knew Adam knew his wife Eve, Right, that's a different

2008
02:02:56.119 --> 02:02:59.840
<v Speaker 4>type of knowing than just having, like I know of

2009
02:03:00.079 --> 02:03:02.760
<v Speaker 4>the person. So no, I would say that Protestants can

2010
02:03:03.000 --> 02:03:08.079
<v Speaker 4>have a knowledge of Jesus and a knowledge of those things.

2011
02:03:09.079 --> 02:03:11.079
<v Speaker 4>If God has his own ways by which he can

2012
02:03:11.159 --> 02:03:13.640
<v Speaker 4>reach a Protestant, he can do that. But it's not

2013
02:03:13.880 --> 02:03:16.800
<v Speaker 4>because of Protestantism. It's in spite of Protestanism, or it's

2014
02:03:16.840 --> 02:03:20.039
<v Speaker 4>in spite of Catholicism, because it's ignoring the fact that

2015
02:03:20.159 --> 02:03:23.199
<v Speaker 4>it's ignoring whether or not God set up an institution

2016
02:03:24.199 --> 02:03:27.439
<v Speaker 4>by which he wanted people to connect to him, namely

2017
02:03:27.520 --> 02:03:27.920
<v Speaker 4>the Church.

2018
02:03:28.920 --> 02:03:30.159
<v Speaker 31>So let me ask you, so what did it?

2019
02:03:31.079 --> 02:03:33.319
<v Speaker 50>That's a good it's a good answer, So let me

2020
02:03:33.359 --> 02:03:35.960
<v Speaker 50>ask you what can I give that same answer though

2021
02:03:36.000 --> 02:03:39.399
<v Speaker 50>to Orthodox because if all men are if all men

2022
02:03:39.439 --> 02:03:41.720
<v Speaker 50>are fallible, right, And I know what the Orthodox teaching

2023
02:03:41.800 --> 02:03:43.800
<v Speaker 50>is on, you know, on that type stuff. When they

2024
02:03:43.840 --> 02:03:47.399
<v Speaker 50>agree on a certain issue whatever, you would say that's that.

2025
02:03:47.439 --> 02:03:49.680
<v Speaker 50>You would say that to God speaking even though infallible

2026
02:03:49.680 --> 02:03:51.279
<v Speaker 50>men are making that decision, you would say, the Holy

2027
02:03:51.319 --> 02:03:53.079
<v Speaker 50>Spirit is leading the church correct.

2028
02:03:54.359 --> 02:03:57.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like when a council is speaking in an ecumenical

2029
02:03:57.439 --> 02:03:59.479
<v Speaker 4>you know, setting with the whole mind of the church

2030
02:04:00.239 --> 02:04:03.840
<v Speaker 4>on issues that are you know, universally agreed upon and

2031
02:04:03.920 --> 02:04:06.720
<v Speaker 4>received eventually by the entire church. It might be unclear

2032
02:04:06.800 --> 02:04:09.199
<v Speaker 4>in that generation what that is, but eventually, but over

2033
02:04:09.279 --> 02:04:11.800
<v Speaker 4>time it gets accepted and we know what the mind

2034
02:04:11.840 --> 02:04:12.000
<v Speaker 4>of it.

2035
02:04:12.079 --> 02:04:13.079
<v Speaker 3>And we know the mind of the church.

2036
02:04:13.199 --> 02:04:18.880
<v Speaker 4>But yes, that's infallible, but not the individual men, I

2037
02:04:19.000 --> 02:04:22.560
<v Speaker 4>see my dutt And by the way, Protestants. Protestants already

2038
02:04:22.600 --> 02:04:26.079
<v Speaker 4>admit this if they think the Bible is infallible, because

2039
02:04:26.079 --> 02:04:29.039
<v Speaker 4>they think that these fallible men came together to make

2040
02:04:29.119 --> 02:04:32.359
<v Speaker 4>at least one infallible decision, namely the Cannon Scripture.

2041
02:04:32.920 --> 02:04:34.199
<v Speaker 3>Or you go with the RC.

2042
02:04:34.319 --> 02:04:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Sproul route of saying that it's a fallible collection of

2043
02:04:37.039 --> 02:04:38.680
<v Speaker 4>infallible books, which is self refuting.

2044
02:04:40.039 --> 02:04:42.960
<v Speaker 50>I guess I come from an evangelical background, and I've

2045
02:04:43.039 --> 02:04:47.800
<v Speaker 50>been just really reading, reading, reading scripture, reading scripture, watching

2046
02:04:47.840 --> 02:04:50.520
<v Speaker 50>a lot of y'all's videos. I mean, I've watched hundreds

2047
02:04:50.560 --> 02:04:54.520
<v Speaker 50>and hundreds of debates on various topics, and I personally

2048
02:04:54.600 --> 02:04:56.800
<v Speaker 50>find that you are the best debater that i've heard.

2049
02:04:57.159 --> 02:05:00.720
<v Speaker 50>I mean, just be honest, yeah, I personally, I mean,

2050
02:05:00.920 --> 02:05:04.159
<v Speaker 50>your arguments are even if you're even if you're in

2051
02:05:04.319 --> 02:05:06.840
<v Speaker 50>the wrong, I mean, you can debate your out of it,

2052
02:05:06.920 --> 02:05:09.399
<v Speaker 50>like it's just that I see.

2053
02:05:09.560 --> 02:05:10.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying you are wrong.

2054
02:05:10.880 --> 02:05:12.840
<v Speaker 8>I'm just saying that that's.

2055
02:05:12.680 --> 02:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>How good you are, that you know that you can

2056
02:05:14.800 --> 02:05:16.720
<v Speaker 3>do that. So let me give you I'm gonna hold on,

2057
02:05:16.840 --> 02:05:17.159
<v Speaker 3>so hold on.

2058
02:05:17.199 --> 02:05:21.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna I'm gonna re share a couple screenshots.

2059
02:05:23.159 --> 02:05:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully I can find the other one here.

2060
02:05:25.680 --> 02:05:29.319
<v Speaker 4>That give you an example from Protestant scholars of how

2061
02:05:31.920 --> 02:05:37.319
<v Speaker 4>elaborate the decision of the canon was, and it gives

2062
02:05:37.359 --> 02:05:40.199
<v Speaker 4>you a window into this so to where hopefully we

2063
02:05:40.239 --> 02:05:43.680
<v Speaker 4>can realize that like the Canon of Scripture wasn't like

2064
02:05:43.840 --> 02:05:50.560
<v Speaker 4>it's it's centuries of variations and differences and debates and disputes,

2065
02:05:51.439 --> 02:05:55.640
<v Speaker 4>and that alone means that Christians were not operating on

2066
02:05:55.720 --> 02:05:59.520
<v Speaker 4>the principle of solar scriptura for all those centuries. So

2067
02:05:59.680 --> 02:06:02.560
<v Speaker 4>why would we be accepting a doctrine of quote sola

2068
02:06:02.600 --> 02:06:07.800
<v Speaker 4>scriptura when God clearly was saving these people, you know,

2069
02:06:08.000 --> 02:06:10.439
<v Speaker 4>during these times without sous.

2070
02:06:10.680 --> 02:06:11.359
<v Speaker 3>Does that make sense?

2071
02:06:11.479 --> 02:06:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Right?

2072
02:06:12.239 --> 02:06:13.319
<v Speaker 3>No, it makes perfect sense.

2073
02:06:13.319 --> 02:06:16.039
<v Speaker 50>And that and that's where what you were saying, God

2074
02:06:16.159 --> 02:06:19.119
<v Speaker 50>is using Catholics in spite of themselves. God's using process

2075
02:06:19.119 --> 02:06:20.000
<v Speaker 50>in spite of themselves.

2076
02:06:20.600 --> 02:06:21.199
<v Speaker 5>Is it? Can I?

2077
02:06:21.319 --> 02:06:23.119
<v Speaker 50>Can I not make the same critique and say that

2078
02:06:23.239 --> 02:06:27.159
<v Speaker 50>God is always working Whenever God's word is shared, It's

2079
02:06:27.239 --> 02:06:29.800
<v Speaker 50>never gonna return void no matter who is give.

2080
02:06:29.960 --> 02:06:30.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2081
02:06:30.159 --> 02:06:33.000
<v Speaker 4>But again, but but to whom much is given, much

2082
02:06:33.159 --> 02:06:35.600
<v Speaker 4>is required. And so the more knowledge that you have,

2083
02:06:35.840 --> 02:06:38.199
<v Speaker 4>the more culpable you are, as Jesus says. And so

2084
02:06:38.319 --> 02:06:40.920
<v Speaker 4>if you do know about these things and have the

2085
02:06:41.000 --> 02:06:43.720
<v Speaker 4>ability to, uh, you know, find an orthodox church.

2086
02:06:43.880 --> 02:06:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Let me give you another example, like underneath, then you're

2087
02:06:46.960 --> 02:06:47.560
<v Speaker 3>more liable.

2088
02:06:47.680 --> 02:06:48.079
<v Speaker 9>So I just.

2089
02:06:48.199 --> 02:06:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Retweeted right now. Uh.

2090
02:06:50.600 --> 02:06:54.600
<v Speaker 4>This is a page from Lee McDonald's book Formation of

2091
02:06:54.600 --> 02:06:56.680
<v Speaker 4>the Christian Biblical Canon, and it's the page where he

2092
02:06:56.760 --> 02:07:01.159
<v Speaker 4>talks about how Revelation was not even and considered the

2093
02:07:01.279 --> 02:07:06.720
<v Speaker 4>Bible in Rome until affinacious went and convinced the Bishop

2094
02:07:06.760 --> 02:07:10.920
<v Speaker 4>of Rome that Revelation and Hebrews and other texts were

2095
02:07:11.039 --> 02:07:15.000
<v Speaker 4>actually should be included in the cannon. So what this

2096
02:07:15.119 --> 02:07:18.399
<v Speaker 4>shows us is that this is not like they're not

2097
02:07:18.600 --> 02:07:21.760
<v Speaker 4>operating on sola scriptura. If they're debating what things go

2098
02:07:21.960 --> 02:07:25.319
<v Speaker 4>into it, that proves they were not Protestants. They did

2099
02:07:25.359 --> 02:07:28.680
<v Speaker 4>not operate on sola scriptura, and thus sol scriptura is

2100
02:07:28.760 --> 02:07:29.199
<v Speaker 4>not true.

2101
02:07:29.239 --> 02:07:31.039
<v Speaker 3>That's one of the key pillars of Protestants.

2102
02:07:31.239 --> 02:07:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Just read this page right here from a Protestant scholar

2103
02:07:34.600 --> 02:07:38.760
<v Speaker 4>on how instrumental the fallible human decisions and argumentation of

2104
02:07:38.840 --> 02:07:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Afthenacious were about what books went in the Bible.

2105
02:07:42.640 --> 02:07:44.399
<v Speaker 50>So, Jay, how are you sharing these pages so I

2106
02:07:44.439 --> 02:07:47.279
<v Speaker 50>can see? I'm sorry, I'm driving, I have the phone.

2107
02:07:47.840 --> 02:07:49.800
<v Speaker 3>I literally just so it should be the top of

2108
02:07:49.840 --> 02:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>my wall. I just sweet at the Regent.

2109
02:07:53.680 --> 02:07:55.920
<v Speaker 4>By the way, I also wrote, if you scroll down

2110
02:07:56.079 --> 02:07:59.640
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, I reposted my two essays on the

2111
02:07:59.720 --> 02:08:02.600
<v Speaker 4>dude cannon from like ten years ago, fifteen years ago.

2112
02:08:03.640 --> 02:08:05.760
<v Speaker 50>Gotcha love to that. Well, I don't want to take

2113
02:08:05.800 --> 02:08:07.279
<v Speaker 50>up too with your time, man, but this, I know

2114
02:08:07.359 --> 02:08:08.079
<v Speaker 50>that was a great question.

2115
02:08:09.520 --> 02:08:10.199
<v Speaker 3>Appreciate it, man.

2116
02:08:10.239 --> 02:08:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Just scroll down to uh Reputation of the Protestant Canon

2117
02:08:14.000 --> 02:08:16.399
<v Speaker 4>Part one and Reputation of the Protestant Canon Part two.

2118
02:08:17.079 --> 02:08:19.159
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I'll scroll down and find him and retweeting or

2119
02:08:19.199 --> 02:08:21.399
<v Speaker 4>something superhero.

2120
02:08:27.680 --> 02:08:29.039
<v Speaker 30>Hey, Hello, can you hear me?

2121
02:08:29.319 --> 02:08:30.600
<v Speaker 8>Stir Hey, dear dar.

2122
02:08:30.720 --> 02:08:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say thank you for the opportunity

2123
02:08:32.560 --> 02:08:33.159
<v Speaker 3>to be able to talk.

2124
02:08:33.720 --> 02:08:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Huge supporter man.

2125
02:08:34.760 --> 02:08:37.399
<v Speaker 51>I've been following for quite a while and to love

2126
02:08:37.479 --> 02:08:39.840
<v Speaker 51>all your debates, especially as the ones that you do

2127
02:08:39.920 --> 02:08:43.560
<v Speaker 51>with Sam Schmann got logic. But I have a I

2128
02:08:43.640 --> 02:08:47.239
<v Speaker 51>grew up Protestant, actually Pentecostal, obviously Protestantism.

2129
02:08:47.800 --> 02:08:50.239
<v Speaker 52>I have a like one or two questions real quick.

2130
02:08:50.399 --> 02:08:54.359
<v Speaker 52>So my parents are like, you know, like I said,

2131
02:08:54.399 --> 02:08:57.199
<v Speaker 52>I grew up Pentecostal. Personally, I feel like the Holy

2132
02:08:57.239 --> 02:08:58.920
<v Speaker 52>spiritsmen leading me to the Orthodox Church.

2133
02:09:00.880 --> 02:09:03.640
<v Speaker 3>But like a lot of that, it's just been like,

2134
02:09:03.760 --> 02:09:06.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, me doing my own uh my own I

2135
02:09:06.640 --> 02:09:09.239
<v Speaker 3>guess devor with Christ and like studying.

2136
02:09:08.880 --> 02:09:09.479
<v Speaker 6>And stuff like that.

2137
02:09:10.199 --> 02:09:13.800
<v Speaker 53>I want to ask you, uh what, like can you

2138
02:09:14.159 --> 02:09:17.840
<v Speaker 53>can you give me like biblical uh I guess or

2139
02:09:17.920 --> 02:09:21.600
<v Speaker 53>scripture to support like tradition and stuff like that.

2140
02:09:24.399 --> 02:09:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I mean there's a bunch.

2141
02:09:26.039 --> 02:09:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I have an article that I wrote called the Biblical

2142
02:09:30.119 --> 02:09:33.560
<v Speaker 4>case for tradition. So go to my website, Jayson Elsins

2143
02:09:33.640 --> 02:09:36.439
<v Speaker 4>dot com and then just look up a Biblical case

2144
02:09:36.520 --> 02:09:39.960
<v Speaker 4>for tradition and that will give you multiple texts to

2145
02:09:40.119 --> 02:09:40.600
<v Speaker 4>discuss it.

2146
02:09:42.880 --> 02:09:43.000
<v Speaker 54>Uh.

2147
02:09:43.039 --> 02:09:47.239
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's guys, trying to get over here. We're about

2148
02:09:47.239 --> 02:09:50.000
<v Speaker 4>to get crushed by some honest so trying to several lives.

2149
02:09:51.840 --> 02:09:53.560
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I mean there's there's quite a few. I mean,

2150
02:09:53.600 --> 02:09:56.399
<v Speaker 4>second Thessalonians too, where Paul talks about, you know, whether

2151
02:09:56.640 --> 02:10:01.079
<v Speaker 4>keep the traditions, whether or oral or written. You know,

2152
02:10:01.600 --> 02:10:05.479
<v Speaker 4>Jesus in Matthew twenty three refers to the Cathedra the

2153
02:10:05.560 --> 02:10:08.800
<v Speaker 4>seat of Moses. There's nothing in the Bible about the

2154
02:10:08.880 --> 02:10:11.239
<v Speaker 4>Pharisees sitting in a seat of Moses. That's tradition.

2155
02:10:13.039 --> 02:10:13.159
<v Speaker 5>You know.

2156
02:10:13.239 --> 02:10:16.159
<v Speaker 4>There's traditions in the New Testament cited where you know,

2157
02:10:16.359 --> 02:10:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Jesus said it's better to give.

2158
02:10:17.800 --> 02:10:18.399
<v Speaker 3>Than to receive.

2159
02:10:18.880 --> 02:10:21.600
<v Speaker 4>There's no statement where Jesus says that in the Gospels,

2160
02:10:21.680 --> 02:10:26.039
<v Speaker 4>so that's some kind of tradition. The Gospels themselves and

2161
02:10:26.239 --> 02:10:28.840
<v Speaker 4>their authorship, particularly in the case of Matthew, are known

2162
02:10:28.920 --> 02:10:32.159
<v Speaker 4>by tradition. So Matthew doesn't tell you that Matthew the

2163
02:10:32.279 --> 02:10:36.960
<v Speaker 4>Disciple is the author of the text. So that's something

2164
02:10:37.039 --> 02:10:40.199
<v Speaker 4>that is known by church tradition, and that the various

2165
02:10:40.800 --> 02:10:44.520
<v Speaker 4>bishoprics and sees passing down the tradition that Matthew the

2166
02:10:44.640 --> 02:10:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Disciple wrote that, and that's very important for canonicity, right.

2167
02:10:49.079 --> 02:10:51.560
<v Speaker 3>So I think Protestants overlook this.

2168
02:10:52.159 --> 02:10:55.560
<v Speaker 4>They think that when I say something like, you can't

2169
02:10:56.000 --> 02:10:59.199
<v Speaker 4>you know, know the canon without the Orthodox Church, a

2170
02:10:59.239 --> 02:11:01.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of times since misunderstand that and they think that

2171
02:11:01.640 --> 02:11:04.079
<v Speaker 4>the argument is just, oh, you're just saying that I

2172
02:11:04.159 --> 02:11:09.560
<v Speaker 4>can't understand those books without orthodoxy, or I can't know

2173
02:11:09.720 --> 02:11:12.319
<v Speaker 4>what the Bible is without an infallible interpreter.

2174
02:11:12.479 --> 02:11:14.039
<v Speaker 3>No, No, that's the Roman Catholic argument.

2175
02:11:14.119 --> 02:11:16.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm making a different argument, which is that you can't

2176
02:11:16.920 --> 02:11:21.800
<v Speaker 4>even know the authorship tradition of the Gospels, which is

2177
02:11:22.039 --> 02:11:26.359
<v Speaker 4>crucial to canonicity, without the tradition of the Church.

2178
02:11:27.319 --> 02:11:29.079
<v Speaker 3>And once I saw F. F.

2179
02:11:29.159 --> 02:11:34.479
<v Speaker 4>Bruce, you know, Lee McDonald, all these Protestant evangelical scholars

2180
02:11:34.600 --> 02:11:39.000
<v Speaker 4>admitting the role of tradition in the Bible and its

2181
02:11:39.039 --> 02:11:42.119
<v Speaker 4>formation in history, It's like, well, obviously this is not

2182
02:11:42.239 --> 02:11:43.359
<v Speaker 4>the Protestant model, so.

2183
02:11:43.399 --> 02:12:10.000
<v Speaker 3>This is just not true. Gary, Gary got on you man.

2184
02:12:14.920 --> 02:12:16.000
<v Speaker 30>I can't hear anybody.

2185
02:12:16.960 --> 02:12:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Jay, Yep, are you there?

2186
02:12:19.720 --> 02:12:19.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

2187
02:12:22.239 --> 02:12:26.640
<v Speaker 30>Wow, Hey, I was just in the neighborhood.

2188
02:12:28.359 --> 02:12:29.039
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell your mind.

2189
02:12:29.359 --> 02:12:32.039
<v Speaker 30>Oh, I just thought i'd say a little something about

2190
02:12:32.079 --> 02:12:34.920
<v Speaker 30>your debate on Calvinism. You know what all these religions

2191
02:12:34.960 --> 02:12:39.680
<v Speaker 30>have in common? What they all believe in the higher

2192
02:12:39.800 --> 02:12:44.319
<v Speaker 30>God or the atheist? Of course, there is no god.

2193
02:12:45.760 --> 02:12:46.520
<v Speaker 3>That's profound, bro.

2194
02:12:47.840 --> 02:12:51.439
<v Speaker 30>And it's interesting that now, Jay, I'm curious you said

2195
02:12:51.439 --> 02:12:55.239
<v Speaker 30>you were even jelical. Is that how you were raised?

2196
02:12:55.920 --> 02:12:55.960
<v Speaker 15>What?

2197
02:12:56.079 --> 02:12:57.000
<v Speaker 30>What did you say?

2198
02:12:57.760 --> 02:12:57.800
<v Speaker 5>What?

2199
02:12:58.640 --> 02:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I can't take the smack into the your dog? No,

2200
02:13:01.760 --> 02:13:04.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm orthodox, Jaron R.

2201
02:13:04.720 --> 02:13:16.199
<v Speaker 4>Jason, excuse me, you'll notice that James's.

2202
02:13:14.760 --> 02:13:16.720
<v Speaker 22>Hey, Ja, I want to ask what's your opinion on

2203
02:13:16.800 --> 02:13:19.479
<v Speaker 22>Gregory of Nissa and his teaching of universalism?

2204
02:13:19.720 --> 02:13:20.560
<v Speaker 8>Like, what would you say to that?

2205
02:13:22.039 --> 02:13:25.159
<v Speaker 4>I would say he's wrong about that, and he's wrong

2206
02:13:25.199 --> 02:13:28.840
<v Speaker 4>about gender being a reduced a product of the fall.

2207
02:13:30.760 --> 02:13:33.119
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, many of the church fathers got many things wrong.

2208
02:13:35.319 --> 02:13:35.960
<v Speaker 26>Thanks, that's it.

2209
02:13:37.640 --> 02:13:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Universal's position is condemned by three councils. Jordan. Hello,

2210
02:13:47.960 --> 02:13:48.399
<v Speaker 3>can you hear me?

2211
02:13:48.520 --> 02:13:48.680
<v Speaker 5>Jay?

2212
02:13:49.319 --> 02:13:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

2213
02:13:50.279 --> 02:13:53.960
<v Speaker 55>Awesome, awesome? Uh my name is Jordan. So either questions

2214
02:13:54.159 --> 02:13:57.640
<v Speaker 55>or you had once sit in one of your lives

2215
02:13:57.760 --> 02:14:00.680
<v Speaker 55>or debates that the this is a God is the

2216
02:14:00.760 --> 02:14:02.920
<v Speaker 55>energy of God? How does that make How does that

2217
02:14:03.119 --> 02:14:06.680
<v Speaker 55>make sense? If God is eternal? How is his existence

2218
02:14:07.239 --> 02:14:07.880
<v Speaker 55>and energy?

2219
02:14:08.039 --> 02:14:08.199
<v Speaker 5>If?

2220
02:14:08.640 --> 02:14:10.920
<v Speaker 55>And correct me if I'm wrong? Isn't this the energy

2221
02:14:10.960 --> 02:14:12.880
<v Speaker 55>is just the act of God, the acts or the

2222
02:14:12.960 --> 02:14:13.960
<v Speaker 55>activities of God.

2223
02:14:16.560 --> 02:14:20.199
<v Speaker 4>Yes, every predicate though, is an energy because they're an

2224
02:14:20.319 --> 02:14:22.560
<v Speaker 4>energy that we know that's revealed to us, and that

2225
02:14:22.640 --> 02:14:27.920
<v Speaker 4>comes down to us. So God's existence, God's actions, all

2226
02:14:27.960 --> 02:14:31.560
<v Speaker 4>of those are in the Orthodox view energies God.

2227
02:14:31.640 --> 02:14:33.279
<v Speaker 3>She's okay, So that that does make sense.

2228
02:14:34.600 --> 02:14:37.399
<v Speaker 4>And yes, he exists from all eternity. His existence is

2229
02:14:37.439 --> 02:14:39.960
<v Speaker 4>an eternal, energetic manifestation.

2230
02:14:41.359 --> 02:14:44.680
<v Speaker 55>So I guess from like, I guess from there that

2231
02:14:44.800 --> 02:14:48.239
<v Speaker 55>there's something beyond his existence that's in his essence that

2232
02:14:48.359 --> 02:14:49.560
<v Speaker 55>we cannot understand.

2233
02:14:50.279 --> 02:14:53.199
<v Speaker 4>But that that's yes, it's not in his essence. It

2234
02:14:53.319 --> 02:14:56.359
<v Speaker 4>is the essence that is beyond existence. And that's directly

2235
02:14:56.520 --> 02:15:01.479
<v Speaker 4>from Dionysius himself. Oh understood. Awesome, Thank you so much.

2236
02:15:01.520 --> 02:15:04.000
<v Speaker 4>That that was that was pretty much great questions.

2237
02:15:04.199 --> 02:15:04.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, R.

2238
02:15:04.640 --> 02:15:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Rate plum Off is a debate with the Marline. I awesome,

2239
02:15:09.520 --> 02:15:11.039
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, you can come back. I thought you were

2240
02:15:11.079 --> 02:15:12.079
<v Speaker 4>done balance.

2241
02:15:16.560 --> 02:15:17.039
<v Speaker 56>Can you hear me?

2242
02:15:18.199 --> 02:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what's up, Jordan? I was inviting you back. I

2243
02:15:20.640 --> 02:15:22.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't realize you were still speaking out that you're done.

2244
02:15:22.680 --> 02:15:23.640
<v Speaker 3>You can come back if you want.

2245
02:15:24.119 --> 02:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I have like a two part question, just a shout out.

2246
02:15:27.920 --> 02:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I love your work with Alex Jones and stuff like that,

2247
02:15:31.920 --> 02:15:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Rachel as well. I see Rachel's here. Her work is nice.

2248
02:15:35.760 --> 02:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>But my first question is do you have like a

2249
02:15:38.239 --> 02:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>specific timeline base of how secularism has infiltrated America and

2250
02:15:42.640 --> 02:15:46.319
<v Speaker 1>how that stems from like the UK and in the

2251
02:15:46.399 --> 02:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>big Banks, the Rothchild set up and there, and the

2252
02:15:50.079 --> 02:15:54.199
<v Speaker 1>work they've been doing to like promote uh. I guess

2253
02:15:54.199 --> 02:15:56.319
<v Speaker 1>you would say degeneracy, but on top of that, like

2254
02:15:56.479 --> 02:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>world government control.

2255
02:16:00.359 --> 02:16:03.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if there's a specific timeline for secularism,

2256
02:16:04.199 --> 02:16:09.960
<v Speaker 4>because you could argue that the secular realm as an

2257
02:16:10.039 --> 02:16:13.960
<v Speaker 4>idea for the state and for state craft goes back

2258
02:16:14.159 --> 02:16:18.239
<v Speaker 4>arguably to the Protestant Reformation and then the seeds of

2259
02:16:18.319 --> 02:16:20.960
<v Speaker 4>it there and then the French Revolution. So I would

2260
02:16:20.960 --> 02:16:25.159
<v Speaker 4>say that the French Revolution is probably the real source

2261
02:16:25.439 --> 02:16:29.159
<v Speaker 4>of the notion of a completely secular realm. That's not

2262
02:16:29.399 --> 02:16:37.040
<v Speaker 4>touched by ethics, morals, or theology outside of human legislation.

2263
02:16:37.680 --> 02:16:40.879
<v Speaker 4>That seems like, I'm pretty sure it's an Enlightenment and

2264
02:16:41.000 --> 02:16:45.760
<v Speaker 4>then French Revolution idea. You could track that though with

2265
02:16:45.959 --> 02:16:50.719
<v Speaker 4>quickly says that the French Revolution was funded by Protestant, Swiss.

2266
02:16:50.479 --> 02:16:51.920
<v Speaker 3>And Jewish banking elites.

2267
02:16:52.879 --> 02:16:56.719
<v Speaker 4>And I would argue that America, as an offshoot of

2268
02:16:56.840 --> 02:17:00.360
<v Speaker 4>the French Revolution already has kind of baked within it

2269
02:17:00.760 --> 02:17:04.239
<v Speaker 4>a secularist tendency. But it's, like we were saying on

2270
02:17:04.280 --> 02:17:07.440
<v Speaker 4>the podcast last night with High Hypocrite, my view is

2271
02:17:07.479 --> 02:17:12.200
<v Speaker 4>that America kind of had kind of competing ideologies in it,

2272
02:17:12.360 --> 02:17:15.040
<v Speaker 4>So it kind of had elements of Christianity and it

2273
02:17:15.120 --> 02:17:20.639
<v Speaker 4>had elements of Enlightenment secular philosophy. And America was always

2274
02:17:20.719 --> 02:17:23.680
<v Speaker 4>just kind of in this journey to see which road

2275
02:17:23.760 --> 02:17:24.239
<v Speaker 4>it would take.

2276
02:17:24.319 --> 02:17:27.479
<v Speaker 3>Would it take the path of enlightenment.

2277
02:17:27.360 --> 02:17:30.799
<v Speaker 4>Uh, you know, Masonic secularism, or would it go in

2278
02:17:30.920 --> 02:17:35.920
<v Speaker 4>a more Christian direction. And it didn't go into Christian

2279
02:17:35.959 --> 02:17:43.159
<v Speaker 4>direction precisely because for well, for many reasons. But one

2280
02:17:43.200 --> 02:17:46.360
<v Speaker 4>of the other things that's important that I think people

2281
02:17:46.479 --> 02:17:52.239
<v Speaker 4>overlook is that that principle of the free reign of

2282
02:17:52.319 --> 02:17:54.559
<v Speaker 4>the of the state, that it's not under the church

2283
02:17:54.680 --> 02:17:56.879
<v Speaker 4>or connect to the Church, that there that there should

2284
02:17:56.879 --> 02:18:00.600
<v Speaker 4>be a quote secular realm. The Roman callit Church was

2285
02:18:00.639 --> 02:18:03.920
<v Speaker 4>condemning that back in the seventeen hundreds and eighteen hundreds

2286
02:18:03.920 --> 02:18:07.360
<v Speaker 4>when they condemned the French Revolution. You had Orthodox writers

2287
02:18:07.399 --> 02:18:11.040
<v Speaker 4>that were condemning it. When the Bolshevik Revolution happened. Probably

2288
02:18:11.120 --> 02:18:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Natiev is a great one about he said that you

2289
02:18:14.440 --> 02:18:18.079
<v Speaker 4>don't get an actual secular state, you actually get the

2290
02:18:18.120 --> 02:18:21.399
<v Speaker 4>state of God. So if you remove the church, you

2291
02:18:21.440 --> 02:18:24.120
<v Speaker 4>don't get this you know, free state, you get this

2292
02:18:24.920 --> 02:18:28.280
<v Speaker 4>God state. So quite a few writers have been kind

2293
02:18:28.280 --> 02:18:30.079
<v Speaker 4>of pointing that out from any centuries.

2294
02:18:30.159 --> 02:18:31.319
<v Speaker 3>But I would argue that you.

2295
02:18:31.520 --> 02:18:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Could just depend it on French Revolution and then the

2296
02:18:34.079 --> 02:18:37.799
<v Speaker 4>influence in the West, and then the Roman Catholic Church

2297
02:18:37.920 --> 02:18:42.079
<v Speaker 4>capitulating to the idea of the good of a secular

2298
02:18:42.159 --> 02:18:47.520
<v Speaker 4>state at Vatican Two and their rejection of Christian nation states.

2299
02:18:48.319 --> 02:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Got to Yeah, I've seen the argument like people have

2300
02:18:51.360 --> 02:18:53.959
<v Speaker 1>made with Thomas Jefferson. They're trying to like twist his

2301
02:18:54.079 --> 02:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>words around, saying like he was trying to separate church

2302
02:18:57.559 --> 02:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>from like the country basically, but he was based only

2303
02:19:00.360 --> 02:19:02.479
<v Speaker 1>trying to like actually promote the government, not trying to

2304
02:19:02.520 --> 02:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>pick a specific church to represent the government, because I mean, I.

2305
02:19:06.600 --> 02:19:10.319
<v Speaker 3>Think but Jefferson does have those Enlightenment Jacobin ideas.

2306
02:19:13.040 --> 02:19:13.239
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

2307
02:19:13.399 --> 02:19:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't trying to like make a case for Thomas Jefferson.

2308
02:19:15.840 --> 02:19:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I was just trying to shift out that what's it called.

2309
02:19:21.840 --> 02:19:23.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's a good example of somebody who.

2310
02:19:25.600 --> 02:19:28.799
<v Speaker 4>Is kind of like got both of those kind of

2311
02:19:28.920 --> 02:19:32.440
<v Speaker 4>tensions within him, where yeah there's some there's some quasi

2312
02:19:32.520 --> 02:19:35.559
<v Speaker 4>Christian elements there, but also these Jacobin elements. And then

2313
02:19:35.719 --> 02:19:38.079
<v Speaker 4>unfortunately America went in the direction of the you know,

2314
02:19:38.360 --> 02:19:39.280
<v Speaker 4>the jacob inside.

2315
02:19:39.440 --> 02:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you could see that with like the Founding Fathers.

2316
02:19:41.760 --> 02:19:43.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even like George Washington, they were trying to

2317
02:19:43.879 --> 02:19:45.719
<v Speaker 1>go to the realm of I think deism, where they

2318
02:19:45.760 --> 02:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>were trying to say, like there's no such thing as

2319
02:19:47.200 --> 02:19:50.079
<v Speaker 1>miracles and all that stuff, and they were being like

2320
02:19:50.159 --> 02:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>deists towards Jesus, and I was just I was like

2321
02:19:54.440 --> 02:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>more or less like trying to like archetypes. Is this

2322
02:19:58.319 --> 02:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>like a spiritual like thing that's going on and it

2323
02:20:02.559 --> 02:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like does it spawn from the Catholic Church or it

2324
02:20:05.079 --> 02:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>just does just spawn from bad men? From the Catholic

2325
02:20:07.360 --> 02:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Church that wanted to use That's.

2326
02:20:11.280 --> 02:20:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's all enlightenment for a Masonic.

2327
02:20:15.799 --> 02:20:16.399
<v Speaker 56>Perfect Yeah.

2328
02:20:16.440 --> 02:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And then my second question, I'm sorry if this is

2329
02:20:18.399 --> 02:20:20.239
<v Speaker 1>too long, you can boot me if you want. But

2330
02:20:20.639 --> 02:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been writing a book for the past like three

2331
02:20:22.600 --> 02:20:25.239
<v Speaker 1>years on this like so called spirit of like whatever

2332
02:20:25.239 --> 02:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about. Then this so called narcissism, like enlightenment crap,

2333
02:20:28.879 --> 02:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>and how that's all connected to like demonic forces and stuff.

2334
02:20:32.239 --> 02:20:33.879
<v Speaker 1>But when I when I go down to the root

2335
02:20:33.959 --> 02:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>cause of this, it comes down to like the Garden

2336
02:20:36.079 --> 02:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of Eden and how well you can say per se,

2337
02:20:39.520 --> 02:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like the devil was the father of all lives, He's

2338
02:20:41.399 --> 02:20:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the father of evil. But my question it will stem

2339
02:20:44.600 --> 02:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>from that being the sense of like is evil. Evil

2340
02:20:48.520 --> 02:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is in the sense of like rejecting God. So with

2341
02:20:50.959 --> 02:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>us being the giving that choice of rejecting God, was

2342
02:20:55.120 --> 02:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that does that mean that we were since uh, we

2343
02:20:57.479 --> 02:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>were created from nothing, and so when we were created

2344
02:20:59.639 --> 02:21:02.239
<v Speaker 1>from nothing and we were given the choice of rejecting

2345
02:21:02.319 --> 02:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the truth and love and then picking nothing to be

2346
02:21:05.159 --> 02:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like the and that nothing is what transpires him to

2347
02:21:08.120 --> 02:21:10.319
<v Speaker 1>like selfishness and like loving creatures.

2348
02:21:13.600 --> 02:21:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, actually, none of the Church fathers do like and

2349
02:21:16.600 --> 02:21:22.120
<v Speaker 4>the choice of vice over virtue to sort of negating

2350
02:21:22.159 --> 02:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>yourself and choosing non being. So, yeah, I think you

2351
02:21:25.559 --> 02:21:28.959
<v Speaker 4>would find that in Saint Athanasius. You would find that

2352
02:21:29.079 --> 02:21:29.879
<v Speaker 4>in sant Agusta.

2353
02:21:29.879 --> 02:21:33.200
<v Speaker 3>And that's a that's a pretty common refrain when the

2354
02:21:33.319 --> 02:21:36.239
<v Speaker 3>church fathers are kind of talking about, you know, the

2355
02:21:36.799 --> 02:21:40.719
<v Speaker 3>metaphysical effects of moral evil. Jordans, do you want to

2356
02:21:40.719 --> 02:21:41.440
<v Speaker 3>ask another question?

2357
02:21:42.200 --> 02:21:45.920
<v Speaker 55>Yeah, I had another question, Thank you for having back on. Also,

2358
02:21:46.319 --> 02:21:49.040
<v Speaker 55>so in the Letter of Especially it's too the Letter

2359
02:21:49.159 --> 02:21:54.959
<v Speaker 55>of Dinitheus that was which is accepted the Council of Jerusalem,

2360
02:21:55.399 --> 02:21:58.280
<v Speaker 55>like the sixteen hundreds. He speaks about in that in

2361
02:21:58.360 --> 02:22:01.280
<v Speaker 55>one of the chapters where he's he uses the word transfer.

2362
02:22:01.360 --> 02:22:05.239
<v Speaker 55>But I've had Protestant friends speak about how he is

2363
02:22:05.360 --> 02:22:09.840
<v Speaker 55>asserting that the Orthodox use that use the exact same

2364
02:22:09.959 --> 02:22:15.200
<v Speaker 55>terminology of transfer. So my question is if that's canon

2365
02:22:15.440 --> 02:22:17.680
<v Speaker 55>or if that's kind of for the entire Orthodox Church?

2366
02:22:18.799 --> 02:22:20.680
<v Speaker 55>Would that not this? Would that not mean that we

2367
02:22:20.799 --> 02:22:25.319
<v Speaker 55>have the exact same understanding of the eucharists except from

2368
02:22:25.440 --> 02:22:27.360
<v Speaker 55>the crease right.

2369
02:22:28.200 --> 02:22:33.399
<v Speaker 4>So, first of all, those are Western translations of texts,

2370
02:22:34.239 --> 02:22:37.440
<v Speaker 4>and it's fine if we have texts that have the

2371
02:22:37.520 --> 02:22:40.159
<v Speaker 4>word transubstantiation, and if there's no I don't have him

2372
02:22:40.159 --> 02:22:40.559
<v Speaker 4>even have a.

2373
02:22:40.559 --> 02:22:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Problem with that word.

2374
02:22:42.760 --> 02:22:46.959
<v Speaker 4>For example, John Damascus in the translations that we have

2375
02:22:47.239 --> 02:22:51.799
<v Speaker 4>of on the Orthodox Faith, use the term transfibstantiation. That

2376
02:22:51.959 --> 02:22:54.959
<v Speaker 4>just means a change of substance in the Eucharist through

2377
02:22:55.360 --> 02:22:56.399
<v Speaker 4>the action of the Church.

2378
02:22:57.239 --> 02:23:00.200
<v Speaker 3>But the Roman Catholic view is not just that. It's

2379
02:23:00.239 --> 02:23:02.040
<v Speaker 3>not a minuscule view of just that.

2380
02:23:02.399 --> 02:23:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Like they have a very worked out dogmatic theology of matter, form,

2381
02:23:06.639 --> 02:23:09.639
<v Speaker 4>and intention for any sacrament, so for the sacrament of

2382
02:23:09.680 --> 02:23:14.079
<v Speaker 4>the Eucharist and trans association their ex opera apparato doctrine

2383
02:23:14.159 --> 02:23:17.600
<v Speaker 4>is part of it. Their doctrine of the words of

2384
02:23:17.680 --> 02:23:23.239
<v Speaker 4>consecration is what does it. And that's odd because that

2385
02:23:23.600 --> 02:23:26.920
<v Speaker 4>is separate from the epiclesis so in the Roman Goalthic position,

2386
02:23:27.120 --> 02:23:29.920
<v Speaker 4>they have no notion of an epic liasis that's at

2387
02:23:29.959 --> 02:23:32.840
<v Speaker 4>all relevant or necessary for the confecting of the Eucharist.

2388
02:23:33.360 --> 02:23:36.200
<v Speaker 4>That's not the Orthodox view. It's foreign to the Orthodox mind.

2389
02:23:36.840 --> 02:23:39.879
<v Speaker 4>And for example, that contributes in the Roman Catholic position

2390
02:23:40.159 --> 02:23:46.639
<v Speaker 4>to this idea of eucharists not being communal. It can

2391
02:23:46.719 --> 02:23:49.079
<v Speaker 4>be something that you can do, you know, like the

2392
02:23:49.479 --> 02:23:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Roman Gathic priests can just do like the words of consecration,

2393
02:23:52.840 --> 02:23:56.559
<v Speaker 4>and he can always forever. For example, if a Roman

2394
02:23:56.559 --> 02:24:00.319
<v Speaker 4>Catholic priests became a Satanist, he can forever confess and

2395
02:24:00.479 --> 02:24:04.520
<v Speaker 4>blaspheme the Eucharist because he never ceases to be a priest.

2396
02:24:05.360 --> 02:24:08.360
<v Speaker 4>We don't think that that's superstitious. If you leave the faith,

2397
02:24:08.920 --> 02:24:11.879
<v Speaker 4>you're not confecting the Eucharists. It doesn't matter how you know,

2398
02:24:12.239 --> 02:24:15.079
<v Speaker 4>how much magic Roman hokey pokey you think you have.

2399
02:24:16.079 --> 02:24:19.360
<v Speaker 4>And so, for example, that's another area where all of

2400
02:24:19.440 --> 02:24:25.600
<v Speaker 4>the metaphysical baggage that Roman Catholicism dogmatizes about transubstantiation is

2401
02:24:25.719 --> 02:24:30.000
<v Speaker 4>not necessarily contained in the word transubstantiation, which just means

2402
02:24:30.120 --> 02:24:30.920
<v Speaker 4>change of substance.

2403
02:24:31.399 --> 02:24:33.760
<v Speaker 3>So no believe. We believe there is a real change

2404
02:24:34.239 --> 02:24:38.399
<v Speaker 3>of the bread and wine, and that change becomes body, blood, soul,

2405
02:24:38.639 --> 02:25:07.079
<v Speaker 3>and uncreated energy of Christ. Jason Jason, Yes, sir.

2406
02:25:07.399 --> 02:25:08.120
<v Speaker 29>Awesome.

2407
02:25:09.280 --> 02:25:11.559
<v Speaker 26>Questions more on then?

2408
02:25:12.360 --> 02:25:14.719
<v Speaker 32>I know if you are familiar with that, I guess

2409
02:25:14.760 --> 02:25:15.639
<v Speaker 32>what's your opinion on?

2410
02:25:17.760 --> 02:25:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this is an I appreciate, it's not it's

2411
02:25:22.159 --> 02:25:24.760
<v Speaker 3>not the topic today. We're not talking to in any fry.

2412
02:25:24.879 --> 02:25:40.440
<v Speaker 3>What's up? Go ahead? Hey?

2413
02:25:41.000 --> 02:25:44.479
<v Speaker 40>I had a geopolitics question kind of similar to something

2414
02:25:44.559 --> 02:25:50.159
<v Speaker 40>a few callers back was saying, all right, uh, something

2415
02:25:50.239 --> 02:25:53.840
<v Speaker 40>you mentioned on the hypercrite stream youuron is the Rothschild

2416
02:25:53.920 --> 02:25:55.680
<v Speaker 40>connection to South Africa.

2417
02:25:55.879 --> 02:25:57.879
<v Speaker 8>I was wondering what that was about.

2418
02:25:59.200 --> 02:26:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so quickly as a whole section where he talks

2419
02:26:01.840 --> 02:26:03.200
<v Speaker 4>about them funding the Bowler War.

2420
02:26:04.479 --> 02:26:06.879
<v Speaker 43>Okay, And I had another related thing.

2421
02:26:07.600 --> 02:26:11.239
<v Speaker 40>Is it anything of note to point out that Musk

2422
02:26:11.319 --> 02:26:14.040
<v Speaker 40>and Peter Teel are both South African? Should we be

2423
02:26:14.120 --> 02:26:15.920
<v Speaker 40>weary of South African technocrats?

2424
02:26:21.159 --> 02:26:24.280
<v Speaker 4>I don't necessarily think that there's a direct connection between

2425
02:26:25.040 --> 02:26:29.200
<v Speaker 4>white people in South Africa and technocracy. I wouldn't think so.

2426
02:26:29.479 --> 02:26:33.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't know exactly why. I mean, Charlie's Thorne,

2427
02:26:33.440 --> 02:26:35.559
<v Speaker 4>isn't she from South Africa too? I mean I don't

2428
02:26:35.559 --> 02:26:37.000
<v Speaker 4>think she's a technocrat, So.

2429
02:26:38.799 --> 02:26:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I mean, I don't know the vibe

2430
02:26:40.920 --> 02:26:43.200
<v Speaker 3>and the ethos of the people of South Africa.

2431
02:26:43.319 --> 02:26:45.239
<v Speaker 4>Like it's like I was saying on on that stream,

2432
02:26:46.360 --> 02:26:48.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm not really well studied on the history of Africa.

2433
02:26:48.840 --> 02:26:50.760
<v Speaker 3>And I mean I know the A and C is bad.

2434
02:26:50.879 --> 02:26:51.680
<v Speaker 3>I know about.

2435
02:26:54.680 --> 02:26:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh, what's his face? That was in prison forever. He

2436
02:26:57.559 --> 02:27:02.799
<v Speaker 4>was actually working for British intelligence oddly enough, Mandela, Yeah,

2437
02:27:02.879 --> 02:27:04.559
<v Speaker 4>Mandela was actually working in British intelligent.

2438
02:27:04.600 --> 02:27:06.799
<v Speaker 3>People don't know that. But so I know about some

2439
02:27:06.879 --> 02:27:08.879
<v Speaker 3>of the espionage saft, but like, I don't really.

2440
02:27:08.879 --> 02:27:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Know a lot of the history of the Boers other

2441
02:27:10.920 --> 02:27:12.559
<v Speaker 4>than the war and all that. Other than that, the

2442
02:27:12.680 --> 02:27:14.040
<v Speaker 4>roth Childs are involved in funding it.

2443
02:27:14.120 --> 02:27:19.040
<v Speaker 40>According to Quickly, Yeah, that doesn't surprise That doesn't surprise

2444
02:27:19.120 --> 02:27:19.479
<v Speaker 40>me at all.

2445
02:27:20.680 --> 02:27:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was actually kind of surprised. Well, actually, I

2446
02:27:22.399 --> 02:27:24.760
<v Speaker 3>wasn't surprised when you mentioned it, because it's like, well, okay, well.

2447
02:27:24.719 --> 02:27:26.959
<v Speaker 43>What do they not fund exactly?

2448
02:27:28.840 --> 02:27:29.440
<v Speaker 5>That was it? Though?

2449
02:27:29.479 --> 02:27:31.639
<v Speaker 3>That was I think I think he mentioned it in

2450
02:27:31.799 --> 02:27:32.520
<v Speaker 3>both books.

2451
02:27:32.559 --> 02:27:34.479
<v Speaker 4>I think it comes up in both Tragy and Hope

2452
02:27:34.559 --> 02:27:36.879
<v Speaker 4>and in Anglo American Establishment.

2453
02:27:36.920 --> 02:27:38.159
<v Speaker 3>I think he mentions it in both.

2454
02:27:39.760 --> 02:27:40.799
<v Speaker 8>I'll have to check that out.

2455
02:27:40.840 --> 02:27:42.719
<v Speaker 43>I have the book, I just need to actually sit

2456
02:27:42.799 --> 02:27:43.319
<v Speaker 43>down and read it.

2457
02:27:46.760 --> 02:27:50.280
<v Speaker 4>They were also involved in the debacle over the Suez

2458
02:27:50.360 --> 02:27:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Canal because Disraeli was.

2459
02:27:52.360 --> 02:27:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Their operative hm hmm. Interesting yep.

2460
02:27:57.079 --> 02:28:01.399
<v Speaker 4>So Disraeli's machinations over the Swiss Canal or at the

2461
02:28:01.479 --> 02:28:02.879
<v Speaker 4>past of the rod Jobs.

2462
02:28:04.079 --> 02:28:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but thank you for the questioning that guys. Tony.

2463
02:28:12.600 --> 02:28:23.879
<v Speaker 3>What's up Tony? Yeah? Help you, yes, sir.

2464
02:28:26.600 --> 02:28:26.799
<v Speaker 30>Yeah.

2465
02:28:26.959 --> 02:28:45.760
<v Speaker 9>So basically, wait, all right, we're.

2466
02:28:45.600 --> 02:28:50.879
<v Speaker 4>Gonna move on open topics for Calvinism, Protestism, Catholicism. Do

2467
02:28:50.920 --> 02:28:55.559
<v Speaker 4>you have politics, if you want Islam, atheism. We've still

2468
02:28:55.639 --> 02:28:59.479
<v Speaker 4>got a lot of people in here, three or so so,

2469
02:29:00.079 --> 02:29:01.520
<v Speaker 4>and we already did your questions. I want to give

2470
02:29:01.520 --> 02:29:03.879
<v Speaker 4>some other people some opportunity to come up they want to.

2471
02:29:05.079 --> 02:29:06.719
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to debate. If you want to ask

2472
02:29:06.719 --> 02:29:08.639
<v Speaker 4>you a question, you can. But if you do want

2473
02:29:08.639 --> 02:29:10.639
<v Speaker 4>a debate, you go to the head of line. Uh,

2474
02:29:11.239 --> 02:29:15.799
<v Speaker 4>just keep it to those topics. Any atheist, any Muslim,

2475
02:29:15.840 --> 02:29:18.680
<v Speaker 4>any church history, Catholicism, Protestants of Calvinism.

2476
02:29:19.360 --> 02:29:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Today's your day. You can even make an argument.

2477
02:29:22.959 --> 02:29:25.399
<v Speaker 4>And presentation as long as you want within reason. If

2478
02:29:25.399 --> 02:29:27.200
<v Speaker 4>you want to refute me, here's your chance. I'll give

2479
02:29:27.200 --> 02:29:28.680
<v Speaker 4>you the mic. You can talk and talk and talk.

2480
02:29:29.159 --> 02:29:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Let me know ahead of time if that's what you'd

2481
02:29:30.639 --> 02:29:35.200
<v Speaker 4>like to do. If not, it's it's.

2482
02:29:35.120 --> 02:29:35.799
<v Speaker 3>All on y'all.

2483
02:29:39.559 --> 02:29:42.719
<v Speaker 4>Anybody else any any how are You've got three hundre

2484
02:29:42.719 --> 02:29:47.319
<v Speaker 4>people and nobody wants to talk what y'all doing. It's

2485
02:29:47.360 --> 02:29:52.879
<v Speaker 4>everybody another some Calvinists in here. So we got three

2486
02:29:52.959 --> 02:29:56.559
<v Speaker 4>innre people, Dames White making a big fuss today and

2487
02:29:57.200 --> 02:30:01.360
<v Speaker 4>none of y'all Calvinists. Y'all just want to lurk a lark.

2488
02:30:01.239 --> 02:30:04.040
<v Speaker 3>And Joseph again. What's up.

2489
02:30:06.200 --> 02:30:06.319
<v Speaker 5>Now?

2490
02:30:06.319 --> 02:30:07.879
<v Speaker 3>I've got to Jordan again. Nobody else comes?

2491
02:30:10.840 --> 02:30:11.639
<v Speaker 10>Hey, Jack, yummy?

2492
02:30:13.280 --> 02:30:13.440
<v Speaker 5>Hey?

2493
02:30:13.479 --> 02:30:13.799
<v Speaker 3>All right?

2494
02:30:13.920 --> 02:30:17.680
<v Speaker 50>So I had another question. So in the Orthodox Church,

2495
02:30:18.159 --> 02:30:22.680
<v Speaker 50>the Eucharist is what saves you. Correct, you guys see

2496
02:30:22.719 --> 02:30:27.280
<v Speaker 50>that as that that's the way of salvation. Baptism and

2497
02:30:27.319 --> 02:30:28.159
<v Speaker 50>then the Eucharist.

2498
02:30:30.520 --> 02:30:32.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean there's a lot of things that quote

2499
02:30:32.280 --> 02:30:34.239
<v Speaker 3>save you. There's not just one thing that saves you.

2500
02:30:34.360 --> 02:30:37.159
<v Speaker 4>All the sacraments are involved in your salvation as well

2501
02:30:37.200 --> 02:30:38.600
<v Speaker 4>as you know, the Bible and everything.

2502
02:30:38.680 --> 02:30:40.360
<v Speaker 50>Okay, got because I don't know why. I just heard

2503
02:30:40.760 --> 02:30:42.799
<v Speaker 50>another Orthodox guy the other day talking about how the

2504
02:30:42.840 --> 02:30:43.840
<v Speaker 50>Eucharist saves you and that.

2505
02:30:46.040 --> 02:30:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I mean we can say that without it

2506
02:30:47.920 --> 02:30:50.920
<v Speaker 3>being you know, exclusive, right, So it's still true. But

2507
02:30:51.000 --> 02:30:52.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean that doesn't mean it's the only thing. Matt,

2508
02:30:52.959 --> 02:30:54.719
<v Speaker 3>what's up? Hey, what's going on?

2509
02:30:55.000 --> 02:30:57.840
<v Speaker 43>Kind of new to the space here, So are you

2510
02:30:57.920 --> 02:31:00.399
<v Speaker 43>taking a stance in any particular religion. Are you just

2511
02:31:00.840 --> 02:31:02.399
<v Speaker 43>taking questions about any religion?

2512
02:31:02.600 --> 02:31:05.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I defend I defend Orthodox Christianity.

2513
02:31:05.680 --> 02:31:08.479
<v Speaker 4>So but we can debate, you know, any challenge to

2514
02:31:08.559 --> 02:31:10.920
<v Speaker 4>that position from any of the other positions.

2515
02:31:11.280 --> 02:31:14.760
<v Speaker 43>Sure, okay, so Orthodox Christianity, that's interesting.

2516
02:31:15.280 --> 02:31:15.399
<v Speaker 15>Uh.

2517
02:31:15.520 --> 02:31:17.680
<v Speaker 43>I guess the first question would be, you know where

2518
02:31:17.719 --> 02:31:22.200
<v Speaker 43>exactly does Orthodox Christianity come from? And you know who

2519
02:31:22.239 --> 02:31:26.239
<v Speaker 43>gets to decide what is orthodox? What is the original

2520
02:31:26.319 --> 02:31:28.040
<v Speaker 43>meaning of the religion?

2521
02:31:29.959 --> 02:31:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean the.

2522
02:31:30.719 --> 02:31:34.559
<v Speaker 4>Historic churches that were set up under the Roman Empire

2523
02:31:34.680 --> 02:31:39.079
<v Speaker 4>in the first second third century by the Apostles their successors,

2524
02:31:39.159 --> 02:31:44.559
<v Speaker 4>who you know, were at the councils of Nicea, Conceptsinople,

2525
02:31:44.680 --> 02:31:48.040
<v Speaker 4>et cetera during the first millennium. So that's what defines

2526
02:31:48.200 --> 02:31:51.760
<v Speaker 4>and that's who defines the Orthodox Church. The Orthodox Church today,

2527
02:31:51.840 --> 02:31:54.920
<v Speaker 4>that's the canonical Orthodox Catholic Church is the same church

2528
02:31:54.920 --> 02:31:55.479
<v Speaker 4>as that church.

2529
02:31:56.719 --> 02:31:58.239
<v Speaker 43>Okay, But I guess my point is, how do how

2530
02:31:58.280 --> 02:32:00.600
<v Speaker 43>do we know exactly what they believed in and exactly

2531
02:32:00.680 --> 02:32:04.239
<v Speaker 43>what they taught all these years later because we can

2532
02:32:04.399 --> 02:32:06.280
<v Speaker 43>go read them where.

2533
02:32:08.559 --> 02:32:08.959
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean?

2534
02:32:09.000 --> 02:32:12.479
<v Speaker 4>Where you can read Ignatious Clement Cyprian, you can read

2535
02:32:13.120 --> 02:32:14.559
<v Speaker 4>Athenacious Alexander.

2536
02:32:14.680 --> 02:32:17.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, these are all pre Nicean Church fathers.

2537
02:32:17.319 --> 02:32:20.680
<v Speaker 43>So we all so we're basing our entire belief system

2538
02:32:20.719 --> 02:32:23.559
<v Speaker 43>on five guys who we have no idea.

2539
02:32:23.799 --> 02:32:25.440
<v Speaker 3>No, I.

2540
02:32:26.959 --> 02:32:29.719
<v Speaker 4>Listed five people who are very famous, known throughout the

2541
02:32:29.879 --> 02:32:32.600
<v Speaker 4>entire world. It's not people that nobody knows who they are.

2542
02:32:32.680 --> 02:32:36.559
<v Speaker 4>They're representative bishops of their time. And then I listed

2543
02:32:36.639 --> 02:32:38.559
<v Speaker 4>the Council of Nicia, which was all the bishops of

2544
02:32:38.559 --> 02:32:40.600
<v Speaker 4>the Roman Empire in three twenty five. So these are

2545
02:32:40.600 --> 02:32:43.159
<v Speaker 4>not nobodies, and they're not people that you can't find.

2546
02:32:43.200 --> 02:32:46.639
<v Speaker 4>They're not obscure people. So, but we don't have the

2547
02:32:46.719 --> 02:32:49.319
<v Speaker 4>original writings of the New Testament.

2548
02:32:49.360 --> 02:32:51.680
<v Speaker 43>We have copies of copies of copies, So how can

2549
02:32:51.719 --> 02:32:55.920
<v Speaker 43>we really trust any document from antiquity and from the past.

2550
02:32:56.639 --> 02:32:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Do we just have to put our faith in it?

2551
02:32:58.719 --> 02:33:03.360
<v Speaker 4>Then, well, the New Testament documents are more well attested

2552
02:33:03.440 --> 02:33:06.799
<v Speaker 4>to than any other ancient and historical document. There's over

2553
02:33:06.920 --> 02:33:09.879
<v Speaker 4>five thousand copies of the New Testament from the first

2554
02:33:09.920 --> 02:33:10.959
<v Speaker 4>few centuries of the church.

2555
02:33:11.799 --> 02:33:12.559
<v Speaker 3>That may be true.

2556
02:33:12.600 --> 02:33:14.840
<v Speaker 43>There may be more copies of the New Testament than

2557
02:33:14.879 --> 02:33:18.000
<v Speaker 43>any other book, but those other books we don't claim

2558
02:33:18.159 --> 02:33:20.920
<v Speaker 43>to be written or inspired by God.

2559
02:33:21.399 --> 02:33:22.719
<v Speaker 3>So I guess that's the big difference.

2560
02:33:22.799 --> 02:33:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's just that was just a reputation of your

2561
02:33:25.159 --> 02:33:28.200
<v Speaker 4>first assertion that it's not well attested to. It is

2562
02:33:28.280 --> 02:33:31.159
<v Speaker 4>well attested to better than any other book like Plato

2563
02:33:31.319 --> 02:33:33.319
<v Speaker 4>or Aristotle or anyone else from antiquity.

2564
02:33:33.760 --> 02:33:35.719
<v Speaker 3>Yes, no, I'm saying that that may be true.

2565
02:33:35.840 --> 02:33:40.200
<v Speaker 43>But if the Orthodox stance is that it is, again

2566
02:33:40.520 --> 02:33:43.639
<v Speaker 43>depending on what you believe, it was inspired by God

2567
02:33:44.120 --> 02:33:47.879
<v Speaker 43>or written by God, or however the Orthodox Church says it.

2568
02:33:48.799 --> 02:33:52.319
<v Speaker 43>Then if that's the case, well we don't we don't

2569
02:33:52.399 --> 02:33:56.200
<v Speaker 43>have that original text. And then if God wrote it

2570
02:33:56.360 --> 02:33:58.520
<v Speaker 43>or inspired if God wrote it, or but.

2571
02:33:58.600 --> 02:34:02.040
<v Speaker 4>That's no, that's your correct, and that we do not

2572
02:34:02.159 --> 02:34:05.559
<v Speaker 4>have what's called autographa. We have later copies of the

2573
02:34:05.639 --> 02:34:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Gospels and Paul's epistles. But that's not how I would

2574
02:34:08.479 --> 02:34:11.440
<v Speaker 4>go about arguing whether the religion is true. I would

2575
02:34:11.520 --> 02:34:13.920
<v Speaker 4>use a more philosophical argument, which is more of a

2576
02:34:14.920 --> 02:34:18.200
<v Speaker 4>more of a worldview level argument than competing claims about

2577
02:34:18.959 --> 02:34:21.559
<v Speaker 4>historicity of the text, because the religion is not ultimately

2578
02:34:21.600 --> 02:34:23.639
<v Speaker 4>even based on the text, because it's the church, the.

2579
02:34:23.639 --> 02:34:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Community the church that produce the text. So the church

2580
02:34:25.920 --> 02:34:27.000
<v Speaker 3>is even prior to the text.

2581
02:34:27.680 --> 02:34:30.520
<v Speaker 43>So does the belief in Jesus being the son of God?

2582
02:34:31.239 --> 02:34:34.600
<v Speaker 43>Is that even relevant within Christianity today? Or is Christianity

2583
02:34:34.639 --> 02:34:35.719
<v Speaker 43>more just about a lifestyle.

2584
02:34:36.600 --> 02:34:39.159
<v Speaker 3>No, that's absolutely fundamental to Christianity.

2585
02:34:39.799 --> 02:34:42.079
<v Speaker 43>Okay, but how can we know that he was actually God?

2586
02:34:44.600 --> 02:34:46.879
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would use a transcendental argument to prove that

2587
02:34:47.000 --> 02:34:49.920
<v Speaker 4>the Christian orthodox Christian paradigm is the only paradigm that

2588
02:34:50.000 --> 02:34:53.040
<v Speaker 4>can give an account for knowledge, ethics, and metaphysics.

2589
02:34:55.520 --> 02:34:57.079
<v Speaker 43>I'm not sure how you how you can prove that.

2590
02:34:57.200 --> 02:35:01.360
<v Speaker 43>I mean, we have no writings from Jesus. Nobody who

2591
02:35:01.440 --> 02:35:05.239
<v Speaker 43>wrote the New Testament actually knew Jesus at all.

2592
02:35:05.319 --> 02:35:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's just assuming that.

2593
02:35:07.440 --> 02:35:10.680
<v Speaker 4>That's assuming that Jesus didn't a point. Apostles who are

2594
02:35:10.719 --> 02:35:14.600
<v Speaker 4>able to write down what Jesus taught and Jesus did

2595
02:35:14.799 --> 02:35:17.239
<v Speaker 4>inspire the Old Testament in our view, so that's not

2596
02:35:17.319 --> 02:35:18.719
<v Speaker 4>even true in terms of the Old Testament.

2597
02:35:18.799 --> 02:35:20.120
<v Speaker 3>That's all about Jesus as well.

2598
02:35:20.159 --> 02:35:22.959
<v Speaker 4>From our perspective, what the argument I gave is called

2599
02:35:23.000 --> 02:35:26.000
<v Speaker 4>a transcendental argument that only with the Christian worldview in

2600
02:35:26.120 --> 02:35:29.360
<v Speaker 4>terms of its metaphysics, ethics, et cetera, can give an

2601
02:35:29.360 --> 02:35:31.559
<v Speaker 4>account for things like reason and logic.

2602
02:35:34.639 --> 02:35:36.079
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, possibly, I mean it depends.

2603
02:35:36.239 --> 02:35:39.959
<v Speaker 43>There's obviously thousands of different religions that people believe in,

2604
02:35:40.079 --> 02:35:42.719
<v Speaker 43>and you know, I don't claim to understand all of

2605
02:35:42.760 --> 02:35:45.360
<v Speaker 43>them because there's so many, and I'm sure they would

2606
02:35:45.559 --> 02:35:48.959
<v Speaker 43>make the same statements about their own religions.

2607
02:35:49.600 --> 02:35:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that's a different thing from actually doing it.

2608
02:35:51.879 --> 02:35:54.559
<v Speaker 3>So what's your what is your perspective, what's your worldview?

2609
02:35:57.440 --> 02:35:57.479
<v Speaker 5>No?

2610
02:35:57.600 --> 02:35:59.479
<v Speaker 43>My view is I'm a Christian, but I think that

2611
02:36:00.159 --> 02:36:02.000
<v Speaker 43>there's a lot of I think there's a lot of issues,

2612
02:36:02.040 --> 02:36:03.639
<v Speaker 43>and I think there's a lot of things that people

2613
02:36:03.799 --> 02:36:05.959
<v Speaker 43>just need to be honest about in terms of the

2614
02:36:06.079 --> 02:36:09.639
<v Speaker 43>text and and what it really means in terms of

2615
02:36:10.719 --> 02:36:12.879
<v Speaker 43>how it relates to us all these years later, two

2616
02:36:12.879 --> 02:36:13.639
<v Speaker 43>thousand years later.

2617
02:36:14.799 --> 02:36:16.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, how could you be a Christian if you don't

2618
02:36:16.399 --> 02:36:17.879
<v Speaker 4>believe that Jesus is the Son of God or that's

2619
02:36:17.920 --> 02:36:21.239
<v Speaker 4>a necessary belief, because that's always been a necessary position

2620
02:36:21.360 --> 02:36:22.000
<v Speaker 4>for Christian No.

2621
02:36:22.239 --> 02:36:24.840
<v Speaker 43>I didn't state it one way or the other what

2622
02:36:25.000 --> 02:36:28.159
<v Speaker 43>I believe. I was just basically stating stating a point

2623
02:36:29.280 --> 02:36:32.319
<v Speaker 43>because I think a lot of people consider themselves cultural

2624
02:36:32.399 --> 02:36:35.440
<v Speaker 43>Christians now where they don't necessarily believe that, but they

2625
02:36:35.520 --> 02:36:36.559
<v Speaker 43>claim Christianity.

2626
02:36:37.440 --> 02:36:39.520
<v Speaker 4>But it sounds like the way you were arguing was

2627
02:36:39.600 --> 02:36:41.959
<v Speaker 4>as a cultural Christian or as an atheist.

2628
02:36:42.040 --> 02:36:44.399
<v Speaker 3>So I'm confused about your position. No, I'm just interested.

2629
02:36:44.520 --> 02:36:50.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm just interested to get your perspective and what's that.

2630
02:36:52.040 --> 02:36:54.239
<v Speaker 3>You won't say your position. No, I'm not going to

2631
02:36:54.280 --> 02:36:54.879
<v Speaker 3>say a position.

2632
02:36:55.840 --> 02:37:00.159
<v Speaker 43>I just just just like to, you know, just like

2633
02:37:00.200 --> 02:37:02.680
<v Speaker 43>to ask questions and see what people's thoughts are because

2634
02:37:02.719 --> 02:37:04.239
<v Speaker 43>it is it is such an interesting topic.

2635
02:37:05.239 --> 02:37:06.639
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So let me give you Let me ask you

2636
02:37:06.680 --> 02:37:08.360
<v Speaker 4>a question. What how would you give an account for

2637
02:37:08.520 --> 02:37:09.399
<v Speaker 4>logic and reasoning?

2638
02:37:11.000 --> 02:37:13.120
<v Speaker 43>An account for logic and reasoning in terms of what

2639
02:37:13.719 --> 02:37:14.559
<v Speaker 43>a specific topic?

2640
02:37:15.840 --> 02:37:18.879
<v Speaker 3>What is logic and what is the faculty of reasoning?

2641
02:37:19.000 --> 02:37:20.719
<v Speaker 3>And how do we have it? And how does it work?

2642
02:37:20.799 --> 02:37:21.520
<v Speaker 3>And how do you know that.

2643
02:37:23.239 --> 02:37:28.479
<v Speaker 43>Logic would be something that I could prove using my brain?

2644
02:37:28.639 --> 02:37:35.079
<v Speaker 43>Deductive reasoning, maybe math science, the environment. You know, reasoning

2645
02:37:35.200 --> 02:37:40.399
<v Speaker 43>is the ability to to dissect certain information and create

2646
02:37:40.639 --> 02:37:41.639
<v Speaker 43>a specific outcome.

2647
02:37:42.559 --> 02:37:46.000
<v Speaker 4>Uh, well, how does using logic prove it? So we

2648
02:37:46.200 --> 02:37:48.600
<v Speaker 4>use all kinds of things that aren't necessarily the case.

2649
02:37:48.680 --> 02:37:52.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean I might utilize, uh, you know, unicorns in

2650
02:37:52.360 --> 02:37:55.719
<v Speaker 4>my narrative story about fiction realms. That doesn't prove that

2651
02:37:55.799 --> 02:37:59.680
<v Speaker 4>unicorns exist. So what why does using a thing mean

2652
02:37:59.719 --> 02:38:00.920
<v Speaker 4>that it's the case.

2653
02:38:00.840 --> 02:38:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Or that it's true.

2654
02:38:04.000 --> 02:38:07.799
<v Speaker 43>No, I just if you're trying to if you're trying

2655
02:38:07.840 --> 02:38:09.760
<v Speaker 43>to get to the point of using logic, are you

2656
02:38:09.799 --> 02:38:11.600
<v Speaker 43>trying to say, how do we use logic to prove

2657
02:38:13.079 --> 02:38:14.959
<v Speaker 43>what we're talking about is true or false?

2658
02:38:16.440 --> 02:38:19.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, earlier I made the argument that only Christianity can

2659
02:38:19.360 --> 02:38:22.280
<v Speaker 4>give an account for those types of things, and you said, well,

2660
02:38:22.399 --> 02:38:25.399
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure about that. So I'm illustrating how I

2661
02:38:25.440 --> 02:38:29.000
<v Speaker 4>would go about making that argument by asking you what

2662
02:38:29.159 --> 02:38:32.319
<v Speaker 4>your account is in your worldview for logic as a

2663
02:38:32.399 --> 02:38:35.159
<v Speaker 4>thing itself, and then I'm going to contrast it with

2664
02:38:35.440 --> 02:38:37.719
<v Speaker 4>my perspective in my account of how logic works.

2665
02:38:38.639 --> 02:38:42.360
<v Speaker 43>Well, quite frankly, I don't think there's anything logical about

2666
02:38:42.840 --> 02:38:46.639
<v Speaker 43>the story. I don't think there's anything logical that really

2667
02:38:46.680 --> 02:38:47.200
<v Speaker 43>makes sense.

2668
02:38:47.360 --> 02:38:51.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's fine, but I'm making a different argument, which

2669
02:38:52.159 --> 02:38:56.479
<v Speaker 4>was about the categories themselves and how we account for them. So,

2670
02:38:56.639 --> 02:38:59.920
<v Speaker 4>for example, if Jesus is the universal principle of reason

2671
02:39:00.200 --> 02:39:03.799
<v Speaker 4>or Logos himself, that's a way to give an account

2672
02:39:03.879 --> 02:39:07.840
<v Speaker 4>for universals and logic, And I'm asking you, if you're

2673
02:39:07.840 --> 02:39:10.120
<v Speaker 4>going to use logic to argue against Christianity that it's

2674
02:39:10.200 --> 02:39:12.440
<v Speaker 4>not logical, what is your account for logic?

2675
02:39:12.520 --> 02:39:12.639
<v Speaker 9>Then?

2676
02:39:14.719 --> 02:39:16.959
<v Speaker 43>Well, I think I think that that's an assumption to

2677
02:39:17.079 --> 02:39:20.319
<v Speaker 43>say that he is he is logos or logic.

2678
02:39:22.680 --> 02:39:23.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, now, wait a minute.

2679
02:39:23.879 --> 02:39:26.360
<v Speaker 4>The revelation, which you don't accept, even though you said

2680
02:39:26.360 --> 02:39:27.399
<v Speaker 4>you're a Christian, calls.

2681
02:39:27.280 --> 02:39:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Him that in John one.

2682
02:39:28.319 --> 02:39:35.879
<v Speaker 43>Right, yes again, but there are you know, many issues obviously.

2683
02:39:35.760 --> 02:39:39.319
<v Speaker 4>With the new text, So maybe maybe it's all false,

2684
02:39:39.479 --> 02:39:41.200
<v Speaker 4>maybe all the Gospels are false.

2685
02:39:41.440 --> 02:39:44.280
<v Speaker 3>How does that help you to give an account for

2686
02:39:44.360 --> 02:39:45.079
<v Speaker 3>reason and logic?

2687
02:39:46.360 --> 02:39:50.520
<v Speaker 43>Well, my, my, my reasoning in logic tells me that

2688
02:39:51.719 --> 02:39:54.120
<v Speaker 43>out of all the people who have ever lived on

2689
02:39:54.280 --> 02:39:54.799
<v Speaker 43>the planet.

2690
02:39:55.360 --> 02:39:58.079
<v Speaker 4>So you're you're just appealing to You're appealing to the

2691
02:39:58.159 --> 02:40:00.079
<v Speaker 4>thing I asked you to give a justification for.

2692
02:40:00.239 --> 02:40:02.920
<v Speaker 3>I asked you how logic is the case and how

2693
02:40:03.000 --> 02:40:03.479
<v Speaker 3>you know that?

2694
02:40:04.120 --> 02:40:06.600
<v Speaker 4>And you're just saying, well, I use logic, yeah, but

2695
02:40:06.639 --> 02:40:08.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm asking you for an account for that.

2696
02:40:08.959 --> 02:40:11.559
<v Speaker 43>No, that the logic is from a it would be

2697
02:40:11.639 --> 02:40:15.840
<v Speaker 43>coming coming from a historical perspective. So from a historical perspective,

2698
02:40:17.559 --> 02:40:22.840
<v Speaker 43>then you must say then that the miracle of him

2699
02:40:22.879 --> 02:40:27.200
<v Speaker 43>being born to virgin and resurrecting from the day you're listening.

2700
02:40:26.920 --> 02:40:29.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm asking you about logic itself, and you keep diverting

2701
02:40:29.840 --> 02:40:33.239
<v Speaker 4>away from that and restating an argument based on logic.

2702
02:40:33.680 --> 02:40:35.520
<v Speaker 4>I want to know in your worldview, how there's such

2703
02:40:35.600 --> 02:40:37.959
<v Speaker 4>a thing as logic and how it works if you're

2704
02:40:38.040 --> 02:40:39.600
<v Speaker 4>an agnostic or whatever you are.

2705
02:40:41.040 --> 02:40:43.520
<v Speaker 43>Yeah, but I'm not sure. I'm not sure proving what

2706
02:40:43.639 --> 02:40:46.799
<v Speaker 43>the definition of logic is has anything to do with

2707
02:40:46.920 --> 02:40:49.280
<v Speaker 43>the using logic to argue against Christianity.

2708
02:40:50.719 --> 02:40:51.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm using logic.

2709
02:40:51.760 --> 02:40:56.959
<v Speaker 43>I'm using logical statements that you must use those.

2710
02:40:56.799 --> 02:41:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Rely on logic. And how does logic work? Well?

2711
02:41:00.520 --> 02:41:03.440
<v Speaker 43>Logic works by using your brain, I would say.

2712
02:41:04.159 --> 02:41:08.040
<v Speaker 4>So again, you're restating the thing that was already disproven

2713
02:41:08.079 --> 02:41:10.559
<v Speaker 4>a minute ago. Using a thing or saying that it's

2714
02:41:10.600 --> 02:41:12.799
<v Speaker 4>in your brain doesn't make it justified and doesn't show

2715
02:41:12.799 --> 02:41:15.239
<v Speaker 4>how it works. How is that universal? Is it just

2716
02:41:15.399 --> 02:41:15.760
<v Speaker 4>your brain?

2717
02:41:15.840 --> 02:41:17.040
<v Speaker 3>What about my Is it in my brain too?

2718
02:41:18.239 --> 02:41:18.280
<v Speaker 5>No?

2719
02:41:18.440 --> 02:41:20.200
<v Speaker 43>But it's like it's like, how do you know anything

2720
02:41:20.319 --> 02:41:23.319
<v Speaker 43>is real in the world? You use your brain, you know?

2721
02:41:23.440 --> 02:41:25.239
<v Speaker 4>So your answer is a two quote way to ask

2722
02:41:25.319 --> 02:41:27.120
<v Speaker 4>me how I know anything is real. When I ask

2723
02:41:27.200 --> 02:41:30.280
<v Speaker 4>you for an account for logic and universal categories.

2724
02:41:30.479 --> 02:41:32.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that.

2725
02:41:32.559 --> 02:41:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Then it's how do you give an account for logic

2726
02:41:36.479 --> 02:41:39.319
<v Speaker 4>and it's universal, immaterial, invariant nature.

2727
02:41:41.239 --> 02:41:41.760
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean?

2728
02:41:41.760 --> 02:41:43.440
<v Speaker 43>You're using a lot of big words, But what does

2729
02:41:43.479 --> 02:41:46.120
<v Speaker 43>that mean? I'm giving you, I'm giving you how.

2730
02:41:46.200 --> 02:41:50.040
<v Speaker 4>These are standard, they're standard philosophical terms. You wanted to

2731
02:41:50.159 --> 02:41:53.000
<v Speaker 4>use logic to argue against Christianity, and I'm saying, okay, fine,

2732
02:41:53.040 --> 02:41:55.680
<v Speaker 4>maybe Christianity is false. I want you now to give

2733
02:41:55.680 --> 02:41:57.360
<v Speaker 4>me an account for the thing that you're relying on

2734
02:41:57.479 --> 02:41:58.520
<v Speaker 4>and using, namely.

2735
02:41:58.319 --> 02:42:04.440
<v Speaker 43>Logic, because the claims of the New Testament and the

2736
02:42:04.520 --> 02:42:05.959
<v Speaker 43>claims of the Bible.

2737
02:42:06.200 --> 02:42:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah again, I already let's say I can see to

2738
02:42:09.959 --> 02:42:12.639
<v Speaker 3>you that the Bible is false. How does that give

2739
02:42:12.680 --> 02:42:15.479
<v Speaker 3>an account for the ontological status of logic?

2740
02:42:16.680 --> 02:42:16.719
<v Speaker 5>No?

2741
02:42:16.840 --> 02:42:19.200
<v Speaker 43>But but I'm but I'm I'm using logic and I'm

2742
02:42:19.239 --> 02:42:20.479
<v Speaker 43>getting to my point, which.

2743
02:42:20.360 --> 02:42:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Is that they make which is a circle. Because I'm

2744
02:42:23.559 --> 02:42:25.959
<v Speaker 4>asking you how you know logic works in the world.

2745
02:42:26.040 --> 02:42:29.200
<v Speaker 4>What's your justification for logic? You're using a thing that

2746
02:42:29.319 --> 02:42:34.239
<v Speaker 4>you have no justification for that was your original critique

2747
02:42:34.280 --> 02:42:36.479
<v Speaker 4>of me, your original critiqus have no critique.

2748
02:42:36.639 --> 02:42:40.719
<v Speaker 3>You're relying on you. Yes you did. You said, we're

2749
02:42:40.760 --> 02:42:42.879
<v Speaker 3>relying on a book that we can't know.

2750
02:42:43.120 --> 02:42:45.399
<v Speaker 43>Yeah, but that's not a mira because you didn't write it.

2751
02:42:45.840 --> 02:42:46.799
<v Speaker 43>It's not a critique on you.

2752
02:42:48.040 --> 02:42:50.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a critique of my position. And stop playing word games.

2753
02:42:51.200 --> 02:42:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm asking you to justify your use of logic because

2754
02:42:54.440 --> 02:42:56.559
<v Speaker 3>that's what you're relying on through a few Christianity. So

2755
02:42:56.680 --> 02:42:59.600
<v Speaker 3>you're in you're in a terrible position. No, not really,

2756
02:43:00.440 --> 02:43:03.440
<v Speaker 3>because okay, so why should we believe logic? How is it?

2757
02:43:03.520 --> 02:43:03.799
<v Speaker 5>What is it?

2758
02:43:03.840 --> 02:43:04.959
<v Speaker 3>Where is logic?

2759
02:43:05.079 --> 02:43:06.479
<v Speaker 6>Is what you live every day?

2760
02:43:06.680 --> 02:43:09.680
<v Speaker 3>And so for instance, you don't say how that is.

2761
02:43:09.760 --> 02:43:11.920
<v Speaker 3>It's just what you live, Okay, I live as a degenerate.

2762
02:43:12.040 --> 02:43:12.120
<v Speaker 25>Is that?

2763
02:43:12.360 --> 02:43:12.399
<v Speaker 3>No?

2764
02:43:12.520 --> 02:43:15.440
<v Speaker 43>No, No, there's there's certain there's certain laws of physics. Right,

2765
02:43:15.440 --> 02:43:17.479
<v Speaker 43>for instance, there's not one person on this planet.

2766
02:43:17.479 --> 02:43:19.399
<v Speaker 3>So the laws of logic or the laws of physics

2767
02:43:19.680 --> 02:43:23.200
<v Speaker 3>in a way, you use logic. Can you observe can

2768
02:43:23.239 --> 02:43:25.239
<v Speaker 3>you can you observe a law of logic under a

2769
02:43:25.399 --> 02:43:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft No?

2770
02:43:26.840 --> 02:43:29.120
<v Speaker 43>But you use logic in order to figure out what

2771
02:43:29.200 --> 02:43:30.159
<v Speaker 43>the laws of physics are.

2772
02:43:30.440 --> 02:43:33.280
<v Speaker 3>You think things, doesn't tell me that it's true or

2773
02:43:33.360 --> 02:43:34.399
<v Speaker 3>that it should be used.

2774
02:43:34.520 --> 02:43:36.879
<v Speaker 4>I gave the example earlier of a unicorn in a

2775
02:43:36.959 --> 02:43:38.680
<v Speaker 4>story that doesn't tell me unicorns are true.

2776
02:43:38.799 --> 02:43:40.520
<v Speaker 43>No, But for instance, there's not one person on this

2777
02:43:40.600 --> 02:43:44.120
<v Speaker 43>planet who can walk on uh in a pool of

2778
02:43:44.280 --> 02:43:47.159
<v Speaker 43>lukewarm water. Right, But in the Bible they make the

2779
02:43:47.239 --> 02:43:50.840
<v Speaker 43>claim that Jesus walked on water. So that's an extraordinary event.

2780
02:43:50.959 --> 02:43:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I already conceded. Yeah, but I concede it

2781
02:43:53.040 --> 02:43:55.239
<v Speaker 3>to you. Let's say that the Bible is false. That's fine,

2782
02:43:55.520 --> 02:43:58.399
<v Speaker 3>So it's all it's all made up stories. How does

2783
02:43:58.479 --> 02:44:01.680
<v Speaker 3>that work for? You? Give an account for logic, the

2784
02:44:01.840 --> 02:44:04.319
<v Speaker 3>very thing that you're using. I don't know that I

2785
02:44:04.440 --> 02:44:07.879
<v Speaker 3>have to make that connection. Oh so you don't have

2786
02:44:08.000 --> 02:44:09.879
<v Speaker 3>to give an account for the things that you rely on,

2787
02:44:10.000 --> 02:44:12.559
<v Speaker 3>but I do. No, no, no, another fallacy.

2788
02:44:12.719 --> 02:44:18.760
<v Speaker 43>I'm not relying on anything but logic and reasoning.

2789
02:44:19.040 --> 02:44:20.399
<v Speaker 3>You and you don't have to give an account.

2790
02:44:20.440 --> 02:44:23.200
<v Speaker 6>No, no what I am, because no you're not.

2791
02:44:23.479 --> 02:44:25.239
<v Speaker 3>You just keep stating that it's the case and that

2792
02:44:25.319 --> 02:44:26.799
<v Speaker 3>you use it. That's not giving an.

2793
02:44:26.719 --> 02:44:29.000
<v Speaker 43>Account for it or explaining how it is or where

2794
02:44:29.040 --> 02:44:30.840
<v Speaker 43>it is or what it is yeah, but your your

2795
02:44:30.959 --> 02:44:34.959
<v Speaker 43>stance is that you're you're believing every word of that

2796
02:44:35.239 --> 02:44:38.600
<v Speaker 43>book as if it is you.

2797
02:44:38.680 --> 02:44:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Want me to accept.

2798
02:44:39.959 --> 02:44:45.440
<v Speaker 4>You want me to accept an immaterial, invariant, unchanging, unseeable

2799
02:44:45.719 --> 02:44:48.000
<v Speaker 4>thing that you can't give an account for.

2800
02:44:48.159 --> 02:44:50.040
<v Speaker 3>You just say it just is. Now, I imagine if

2801
02:44:50.079 --> 02:44:52.879
<v Speaker 3>I came to this debate and I said, God just is,

2802
02:44:53.520 --> 02:44:56.399
<v Speaker 3>you would laugh at that. That's literally what you're doing

2803
02:44:56.520 --> 02:44:58.440
<v Speaker 3>with the thing that you're using to try to argue

2804
02:44:58.479 --> 02:44:59.559
<v Speaker 3>against God's existence.

2805
02:45:00.760 --> 02:45:02.760
<v Speaker 43>No, that's not what I'm doing, and I'm not arguing

2806
02:45:02.760 --> 02:45:03.760
<v Speaker 43>against God's existence.

2807
02:45:04.639 --> 02:45:07.040
<v Speaker 3>It's not what you're doing. What you literally said about

2808
02:45:07.079 --> 02:45:09.200
<v Speaker 3>ten times that logic is just what it is, and

2809
02:45:09.280 --> 02:45:10.920
<v Speaker 3>it's what we do with our brain. It just is.

2810
02:45:11.920 --> 02:45:14.680
<v Speaker 43>No, I mean, my argument is that it's a book

2811
02:45:14.840 --> 02:45:17.799
<v Speaker 43>full of mistakes, contradictions, it's not inerranive.

2812
02:45:18.159 --> 02:45:19.040
<v Speaker 3>How does that tell you?

2813
02:45:19.200 --> 02:45:19.239
<v Speaker 11>What?

2814
02:45:19.559 --> 02:45:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Can you not repeat? You don't even understand what my

2815
02:45:21.680 --> 02:45:25.040
<v Speaker 3>argument is? You couldn't Could you restate my argument? You're

2816
02:45:25.040 --> 02:45:27.479
<v Speaker 3>all over the place. I don't know exactly. I don't

2817
02:45:27.600 --> 02:45:29.879
<v Speaker 3>know that. I'm not all over the place. I'm very

2818
02:45:29.920 --> 02:45:32.559
<v Speaker 3>precise for the last twenty minutes exactly what my argument is.

2819
02:45:32.719 --> 02:45:34.319
<v Speaker 3>How am I all over the place when I've asked you,

2820
02:45:34.399 --> 02:45:37.440
<v Speaker 3>like twenty times to give a justification for what logic

2821
02:45:37.600 --> 02:45:38.319
<v Speaker 3>is or how you use it.

2822
02:45:38.440 --> 02:45:40.959
<v Speaker 43>Well, you're asking me to use logic and reasoning, and

2823
02:45:41.040 --> 02:45:45.319
<v Speaker 43>I'm using logical examples of why there might be a problem.

2824
02:45:45.399 --> 02:45:48.879
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm asking you a higher order question. I'm asking

2825
02:45:48.959 --> 02:45:51.520
<v Speaker 3>you what it is? Not do you use it? What?

2826
02:45:51.879 --> 02:45:52.159
<v Speaker 26>Is it?

2827
02:45:52.360 --> 02:45:53.120
<v Speaker 5>What? What? What?

2828
02:45:53.319 --> 02:45:56.040
<v Speaker 43>Does what your definition of logic have anything to do

2829
02:45:56.440 --> 02:45:59.840
<v Speaker 43>with what we're talking about. You're trying to confuse every

2830
02:46:00.040 --> 02:46:01.159
<v Speaker 43>body in here with your.

2831
02:46:02.719 --> 02:46:05.159
<v Speaker 3>Laughing at you. They're laughing at you because you can't

2832
02:46:05.200 --> 02:46:07.120
<v Speaker 3>give an account for the thing that you're using. No,

2833
02:46:07.280 --> 02:46:09.959
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. I don't think so. No, you're

2834
02:46:10.000 --> 02:46:12.600
<v Speaker 3>not you're not actually giving I assure you. And then

2835
02:46:12.639 --> 02:46:14.440
<v Speaker 3>when it goes on YouTube, everyone's gonna be laughing to it,

2836
02:46:14.520 --> 02:46:16.079
<v Speaker 3>So I assure you that you will be laughed at.

2837
02:46:16.719 --> 02:46:19.239
<v Speaker 43>No, I don't actually think that, because you haven't given

2838
02:46:19.280 --> 02:46:22.760
<v Speaker 43>me one explanation for why.

2839
02:46:22.840 --> 02:46:25.440
<v Speaker 3>You can't even restate what? Can you restate? Can you

2840
02:46:25.520 --> 02:46:26.559
<v Speaker 3>restate what my argument is?

2841
02:46:26.799 --> 02:46:30.600
<v Speaker 43>You can restate it. Well, you can restate it if

2842
02:46:30.639 --> 02:46:30.920
<v Speaker 43>you'd like.

2843
02:46:32.799 --> 02:46:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I've done it about ten times, and I want to

2844
02:46:34.760 --> 02:46:36.079
<v Speaker 3>see if you're able to do it.

2845
02:46:37.840 --> 02:46:40.760
<v Speaker 43>You're you're not giving an argument at all, all right,

2846
02:46:42.239 --> 02:46:45.239
<v Speaker 43>you're not even giving an argument for what a sarge.

2847
02:46:45.959 --> 02:46:48.200
<v Speaker 3>I gave him multiple arguments in production.

2848
02:47:04.879 --> 02:47:21.079
<v Speaker 4>Stone, Stone, Stone, It's amazing, like he couldn't even grasp

2849
02:47:21.319 --> 02:47:25.959
<v Speaker 4>or restate twenty times me asking him, well, what is

2850
02:47:26.040 --> 02:47:28.760
<v Speaker 4>the thing that you're relying on when you call the

2851
02:47:28.840 --> 02:47:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Bible illogical and Christianity irrational? I literally ask him twenty

2852
02:47:35.040 --> 02:47:36.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, all you have to do is just restate.

2853
02:47:36.520 --> 02:47:38.440
<v Speaker 4>You know, you're asking me to give an account for logic.

2854
02:47:39.479 --> 02:47:42.360
<v Speaker 4>It's like talking to like a five year old. They

2855
02:47:42.479 --> 02:47:43.680
<v Speaker 4>just keep being totulant.

2856
02:47:44.120 --> 02:47:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Stone.

2857
02:47:44.479 --> 02:47:49.120
<v Speaker 57>I'm mute, man, Hello, sir, I'm sorry, I just joined

2858
02:47:49.159 --> 02:47:52.200
<v Speaker 57>your space. Can then I ask your religion?

2859
02:47:52.280 --> 02:47:54.959
<v Speaker 5>First? Are you Christian?

2860
02:47:59.000 --> 02:47:59.280
<v Speaker 9>Okay?

2861
02:47:59.399 --> 02:47:59.719
<v Speaker 3>Very good?

2862
02:48:00.079 --> 02:48:00.959
<v Speaker 6>I am a Muslim?

2863
02:48:02.159 --> 02:48:04.159
<v Speaker 9>Very good, very good, very good.

2864
02:48:06.680 --> 02:48:11.399
<v Speaker 43>I'm Muslim, oh, very good, very yes.

2865
02:48:11.760 --> 02:48:13.120
<v Speaker 3>So what is the debate today?

2866
02:48:14.799 --> 02:48:20.399
<v Speaker 4>Anything relating to Islam, Christianity, Atheism, Protestantism, you name it?

2867
02:48:22.920 --> 02:48:23.239
<v Speaker 9>Okay?

2868
02:48:23.479 --> 02:48:25.719
<v Speaker 57>So can I start?

2869
02:48:27.159 --> 02:48:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

2870
02:48:28.840 --> 02:48:32.399
<v Speaker 57>Okay, So I personally believe the Quran is the word

2871
02:48:32.479 --> 02:48:36.040
<v Speaker 57>of God, the direct words of God, because it came

2872
02:48:36.760 --> 02:48:40.840
<v Speaker 57>to correct what came before to Moses and to Jesus.

2873
02:48:41.920 --> 02:48:43.079
<v Speaker 57>So the current tell us.

2874
02:48:43.799 --> 02:48:48.079
<v Speaker 3>On why would all words be corrupted to Moses and Jesus?

2875
02:48:51.520 --> 02:48:52.479
<v Speaker 57>What do you mean corrupted?

2876
02:48:53.959 --> 02:48:57.959
<v Speaker 3>Well, you're arguing that he came to fix what was given.

2877
02:48:57.799 --> 02:49:02.520
<v Speaker 57>Before, right, Yes, because he claimed that people changed it

2878
02:49:02.680 --> 02:49:03.840
<v Speaker 57>with their own hands.

2879
02:49:04.239 --> 02:49:04.360
<v Speaker 25>Uh.

2880
02:49:04.639 --> 02:49:07.360
<v Speaker 3>No, it says that they changed it with their it.

2881
02:49:07.600 --> 02:49:10.280
<v Speaker 4>It says they spoke against it with their tongues and

2882
02:49:10.399 --> 02:49:13.239
<v Speaker 4>that they wrote false versions. It doesn't say that the

2883
02:49:13.399 --> 02:49:16.200
<v Speaker 4>in ngeal or that the Torah was changed.

2884
02:49:18.239 --> 02:49:18.360
<v Speaker 5>Hm.

2885
02:49:18.799 --> 02:49:23.639
<v Speaker 57>It says that descriptures before was changed, and descriptures.

2886
02:49:23.040 --> 02:49:28.319
<v Speaker 4>Before that in chapter and five, five forty seven and on,

2887
02:49:28.559 --> 02:49:31.079
<v Speaker 4>it says that you can check what is new with

2888
02:49:31.239 --> 02:49:32.040
<v Speaker 4>what came before.

2889
02:49:32.120 --> 02:49:33.840
<v Speaker 3>How could you do that if it was changed?

2890
02:49:35.239 --> 02:49:39.680
<v Speaker 57>Okay, so easy, we can do it even easier. So

2891
02:49:39.799 --> 02:49:42.600
<v Speaker 57>the current tells us it's the direct words of God.

2892
02:49:43.280 --> 02:49:45.920
<v Speaker 57>And to know that it's the word of God, you

2893
02:49:46.040 --> 02:49:46.920
<v Speaker 57>have to challenge it.

2894
02:49:47.559 --> 02:49:48.760
<v Speaker 3>You have to look for mistake.

2895
02:49:48.840 --> 02:49:52.319
<v Speaker 4>And that's exactly what I'm doing. Because if if that

2896
02:49:52.399 --> 02:49:56.760
<v Speaker 4>you can check it before? No, why would I with

2897
02:49:56.920 --> 02:49:57.799
<v Speaker 4>something corrupted?

2898
02:49:57.959 --> 02:49:58.760
<v Speaker 3>How could I check it?

2899
02:49:59.760 --> 02:49:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Jim?

2900
02:50:00.000 --> 02:50:01.399
<v Speaker 57>Please let me speak one by one?

2901
02:50:01.479 --> 02:50:01.680
<v Speaker 9>Brother?

2902
02:50:01.959 --> 02:50:03.959
<v Speaker 3>How can I check it if it's corrupted.

2903
02:50:04.840 --> 02:50:06.319
<v Speaker 57>I'm just saying it's easy.

2904
02:50:06.399 --> 02:50:06.639
<v Speaker 9>Brother.

2905
02:50:07.840 --> 02:50:10.079
<v Speaker 57>If you find the Quran, say that. If you find

2906
02:50:10.120 --> 02:50:12.799
<v Speaker 57>a single mistakes and contradiction into Quran.

2907
02:50:13.000 --> 02:50:14.520
<v Speaker 3>No, you don't even understand what I'm saying.

2908
02:50:15.319 --> 02:50:18.920
<v Speaker 57>Brother, I'm listening.

2909
02:50:19.000 --> 02:50:19.840
<v Speaker 5>You'll just look.

2910
02:50:22.360 --> 02:50:26.200
<v Speaker 4>The Quran says you checked the Quran according to prior revelation.

2911
02:50:28.280 --> 02:50:30.760
<v Speaker 4>You just said the prior revelation is corrupted. Why would

2912
02:50:30.760 --> 02:50:32.440
<v Speaker 4>I check it against the thing that's corrupted?

2913
02:50:34.159 --> 02:50:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Brandon? What's up?

2914
02:50:41.959 --> 02:50:42.079
<v Speaker 30>Jack?

2915
02:50:42.120 --> 02:50:42.559
<v Speaker 5>Can you hear me?

2916
02:50:44.600 --> 02:50:44.760
<v Speaker 25>Man?

2917
02:50:45.520 --> 02:50:47.799
<v Speaker 58>First, I just want to say I am an inquirer

2918
02:50:48.239 --> 02:50:52.760
<v Speaker 58>and thanks for helping me come back to the church.

2919
02:50:54.440 --> 02:50:54.600
<v Speaker 12>Uh.

2920
02:50:55.600 --> 02:50:58.799
<v Speaker 58>When you are critiquing Islam, and specifically the problem of

2921
02:50:58.879 --> 02:51:01.440
<v Speaker 58>the one and the many, can you run that argument,

2922
02:51:02.959 --> 02:51:05.319
<v Speaker 58>you know, the relation of a law to his essence

2923
02:51:05.799 --> 02:51:09.639
<v Speaker 58>or to his attributes rather, can you help me pick

2924
02:51:09.680 --> 02:51:10.520
<v Speaker 58>that argument apart?

2925
02:51:12.879 --> 02:51:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, it really depends on which akida of Islam you're

2926
02:51:16.760 --> 02:51:18.040
<v Speaker 4>talking to, can you mute?

2927
02:51:20.159 --> 02:51:20.360
<v Speaker 30>Yeah?

2928
02:51:21.920 --> 02:51:24.000
<v Speaker 4>So that argument is really going to have to be

2929
02:51:24.040 --> 02:51:27.319
<v Speaker 4>tweaked depending upon whether you're talking to Ashia or whether

2930
02:51:27.360 --> 02:51:31.559
<v Speaker 4>you're talking to an Ashari, or whether you're talking to

2931
02:51:32.440 --> 02:51:35.000
<v Speaker 4>an AUTHORI. I mean, it really just depends because they

2932
02:51:35.079 --> 02:51:38.959
<v Speaker 4>have different accounts of the attributes and the relationship of

2933
02:51:39.000 --> 02:51:42.360
<v Speaker 4>the attributes, the essence and the relationship of Allah to

2934
02:51:43.760 --> 02:51:47.200
<v Speaker 4>the Quran, whether it's uncreated in the sense of, I

2935
02:51:47.280 --> 02:51:49.680
<v Speaker 4>mean they believe in uncreated Koran, but then whether the

2936
02:51:49.799 --> 02:51:54.399
<v Speaker 4>Koran is able to be translated into the various languages,

2937
02:51:54.719 --> 02:51:58.680
<v Speaker 4>and whether the words of Allah themselves to Gabriel are

2938
02:51:58.719 --> 02:51:59.879
<v Speaker 4>then created or uncreated.

2939
02:52:00.079 --> 02:52:02.840
<v Speaker 3>So they just move the problem, move the problem back

2940
02:52:02.920 --> 02:52:06.600
<v Speaker 3>and stuff. So it really depends upon which school of Islam.

2941
02:52:06.399 --> 02:52:08.760
<v Speaker 4>You're talking about when it comes to the attributes. So

2942
02:52:08.840 --> 02:52:13.159
<v Speaker 4>if you're talking to like a Daniel or Jake, who

2943
02:52:13.280 --> 02:52:20.200
<v Speaker 4>are Wahabi Salafi, like, their approach is going to say that, like,

2944
02:52:20.319 --> 02:52:23.760
<v Speaker 4>the attributes are really distinct from Allah and that they

2945
02:52:24.360 --> 02:52:29.159
<v Speaker 4>exist in and of themselves in some kind of Well, actually,

2946
02:52:29.200 --> 02:52:33.000
<v Speaker 4>when doctor Branson asked Jake this, he says, do you

2947
02:52:33.120 --> 02:52:38.760
<v Speaker 4>think that the attributes are self existing? Because Jake is

2948
02:52:38.799 --> 02:52:41.319
<v Speaker 4>trying to say that anything that is self existing, like

2949
02:52:42.479 --> 02:52:46.440
<v Speaker 4>the father, is higher in status than the son, because

2950
02:52:46.440 --> 02:52:49.159
<v Speaker 4>the son, if he requires the father for his existence,

2951
02:52:50.000 --> 02:52:53.879
<v Speaker 4>does not possess the attribute of self existence. And so

2952
02:52:54.799 --> 02:52:58.840
<v Speaker 4>the same argument is just applicable to the attributes, But

2953
02:52:58.959 --> 02:53:02.120
<v Speaker 4>it depends upon how that Muslim is going to give

2954
02:53:02.159 --> 02:53:05.840
<v Speaker 4>an account of the attributes. So, for example, against doctor Khalil,

2955
02:53:06.520 --> 02:53:08.719
<v Speaker 4>you couldn't make that argument the way that you would

2956
02:53:08.760 --> 02:53:11.680
<v Speaker 4>make the argument against Jake, because doctor Khalil is not

2957
02:53:11.799 --> 02:53:14.760
<v Speaker 4>going to speak of the attributes as really distinct the

2958
02:53:14.840 --> 02:53:17.200
<v Speaker 4>way that Jake will. And so if you ask him,

2959
02:53:17.399 --> 02:53:21.399
<v Speaker 4>ask Jake like, is Allah identical to his essence, I mean,

2960
02:53:21.440 --> 02:53:22.399
<v Speaker 4>to his attributes?

2961
02:53:22.520 --> 02:53:22.559
<v Speaker 9>No?

2962
02:53:23.280 --> 02:53:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Are the attributes fully Allah and fully divine? Yes?

2963
02:53:27.000 --> 02:53:29.959
<v Speaker 4>Then how do you not have a composite do it?

2964
02:53:31.440 --> 02:53:36.680
<v Speaker 4>In regard to your argument for how heap doctor Kalil

2965
02:53:36.879 --> 02:53:44.680
<v Speaker 4>make the same argument, the platonic argument, a new simplicity

2966
02:53:44.719 --> 02:53:48.000
<v Speaker 4>position that he doesn't even have an account for actual differentiation,

2967
02:53:48.680 --> 02:53:51.760
<v Speaker 4>the same way we'd argue against Ads, because ADS is

2968
02:53:51.840 --> 02:53:55.239
<v Speaker 4>ultimately a neoplatonic position. So again, it just depends up

2969
02:53:55.239 --> 02:53:56.559
<v Speaker 4>on which Muslims you're talking to.

2970
02:53:56.719 --> 02:54:00.520
<v Speaker 3>And how their school gives an account for or Allah

2971
02:54:00.600 --> 02:54:01.399
<v Speaker 3>and his attributes.

2972
02:54:04.680 --> 02:54:04.959
<v Speaker 43>Got it?

2973
02:54:05.120 --> 02:54:05.600
<v Speaker 58>Thanks man?

2974
02:54:06.520 --> 02:54:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So it's not really the one in the many problem.

2975
02:54:08.799 --> 02:54:12.959
<v Speaker 3>It's more like the attributes.

2976
02:54:14.399 --> 02:54:18.600
<v Speaker 4>In their relationship to Allah, and whether a lat really

2977
02:54:18.719 --> 02:54:22.040
<v Speaker 4>is many or not? Is I mean, I guess it's

2978
02:54:22.079 --> 02:54:23.639
<v Speaker 4>a kind of a one in many kind of argument,

2979
02:54:23.719 --> 02:54:27.719
<v Speaker 4>but it's more so the ontological status of the attributes

2980
02:54:28.559 --> 02:54:33.520
<v Speaker 4>and the majority, like the Sunnies, they believe there's an

2981
02:54:33.559 --> 02:54:36.440
<v Speaker 4>uncreated Koran. You could just ask them like, okay, is

2982
02:54:36.520 --> 02:54:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the uncreated Koran identical to Allah?

2983
02:54:39.520 --> 02:54:39.559
<v Speaker 5>No?

2984
02:54:40.200 --> 02:54:44.479
<v Speaker 4>Oh, okay, then there's two uncreated eternal things, and the

2985
02:54:44.559 --> 02:54:46.719
<v Speaker 4>same with the attributes. Like that's a really easy way

2986
02:54:46.760 --> 02:54:47.079
<v Speaker 4>to put it.

2987
02:54:48.159 --> 02:54:51.040
<v Speaker 3>They'll go, No, it is the speech of a lot. Okay,

2988
02:54:51.079 --> 02:54:52.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't care whether you call it the speech of

2989
02:54:52.440 --> 02:54:53.360
<v Speaker 3>a law. Is it eternal?

2990
02:54:53.959 --> 02:54:54.120
<v Speaker 32>Yes?

2991
02:54:55.120 --> 02:54:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Is it allah? No, it is the speech of a

2992
02:54:56.799 --> 02:55:00.799
<v Speaker 3>lat Okay. How many is that allah? Speech of a law?

2993
02:55:01.239 --> 02:55:03.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm counting too, how many do you count?

2994
02:55:04.239 --> 02:55:04.280
<v Speaker 59>No?

2995
02:55:04.440 --> 02:55:04.680
<v Speaker 60>It is.

2996
02:55:06.280 --> 02:55:09.040
<v Speaker 3>It's like they just it's like talking to five year

2997
02:55:09.040 --> 02:55:09.639
<v Speaker 3>old robots.

2998
02:55:11.280 --> 02:55:20.559
<v Speaker 61>They Vincent, Hey, jay, uh, I don't want to disappoint.

2999
02:55:20.559 --> 02:55:22.760
<v Speaker 61>My name is actually not Vincent van Gogh, and I

3000
02:55:22.840 --> 02:55:26.000
<v Speaker 61>am a woman. Are you able to hear me?

3001
02:55:26.079 --> 02:55:26.319
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

3002
02:55:27.840 --> 02:55:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

3003
02:55:28.360 --> 02:55:28.639
<v Speaker 31>Okay?

3004
02:55:29.079 --> 02:55:31.840
<v Speaker 61>Uh So I'm Catholic. My friend whose orthodox got me

3005
02:55:31.920 --> 02:55:34.799
<v Speaker 61>under your videos, especially when we're discussing the the occult

3006
02:55:35.000 --> 02:55:38.920
<v Speaker 61>and love your roots videos, So thanks for taking allowing

3007
02:55:39.000 --> 02:55:39.559
<v Speaker 61>me to speak.

3008
02:55:40.000 --> 02:55:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

3009
02:55:40.639 --> 02:55:44.399
<v Speaker 61>I have one comment in one question, uh, and I

3010
02:55:44.440 --> 02:55:46.600
<v Speaker 61>think I could throw them together. The one comment is

3011
02:55:46.879 --> 02:55:49.639
<v Speaker 61>I recently saw your I don't want to call it

3012
02:55:49.799 --> 02:55:54.280
<v Speaker 61>a debate, but that buffoon called misfit Patriot appeared on

3013
02:55:54.360 --> 02:56:00.319
<v Speaker 61>your live feed. Yeah, and you know it was embarrassing. Honestly,

3014
02:56:00.440 --> 02:56:03.280
<v Speaker 61>is a Catholic like those type of people that's not

3015
02:56:03.719 --> 02:56:05.120
<v Speaker 61>the people that go to Mass every week?

3016
02:56:05.200 --> 02:56:07.600
<v Speaker 3>That that's not you know, I used to be a Catholic,

3017
02:56:07.600 --> 02:56:08.239
<v Speaker 3>so I understand.

3018
02:56:08.559 --> 02:56:10.520
<v Speaker 61>Yeah, and so that's kind of like my thread, So

3019
02:56:10.680 --> 02:56:13.239
<v Speaker 61>I mean, that's really it was so embarrassing. But I

3020
02:56:13.319 --> 02:56:15.879
<v Speaker 61>do see a lot of that now, especially on the

3021
02:56:16.319 --> 02:56:20.399
<v Speaker 61>online stuff where people I think someone mentioned I don't

3022
02:56:20.399 --> 02:56:22.239
<v Speaker 61>know the two speakers ago, the guy that said he

3023
02:56:22.360 --> 02:56:25.840
<v Speaker 61>was Catholic but was arguing against Christianity.

3024
02:56:26.399 --> 02:56:27.959
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he I don't even know if he

3025
02:56:28.079 --> 02:56:30.120
<v Speaker 4>knows what he is or if he's just a grifter.

3026
02:56:30.280 --> 02:56:32.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he went on Twitter immediately after the debate

3027
02:56:32.680 --> 02:56:34.920
<v Speaker 4>and he's like, no, I'm not really Catholic, but I

3028
02:56:35.000 --> 02:56:36.159
<v Speaker 4>was raised Catholic, So I don't think.

3029
02:56:36.440 --> 02:56:38.559
<v Speaker 61>Yeah, I think think I was just a complete moron.

3030
02:56:40.440 --> 02:56:42.399
<v Speaker 61>So I would love any more insight you have on that,

3031
02:56:42.479 --> 02:56:44.799
<v Speaker 61>because like I couldn't get enough of it. How what

3032
02:56:44.879 --> 02:56:47.280
<v Speaker 61>a moron he was. But unfortunately it's like a stain

3033
02:56:48.920 --> 02:56:52.639
<v Speaker 61>on Catholics. And I was wondering if my question is,

3034
02:56:53.520 --> 02:56:56.079
<v Speaker 61>and it might be too broad of a question, but

3035
02:56:56.680 --> 02:57:01.280
<v Speaker 61>is there a point you can say that really was

3036
02:57:01.280 --> 02:57:04.639
<v Speaker 61>a tipping point from you go into Catholicism to Orthodoxy.

3037
02:57:05.079 --> 02:57:07.959
<v Speaker 61>I mean I love learning about Orthodoxy, and I love

3038
02:57:08.000 --> 02:57:12.200
<v Speaker 61>listening to your shows and your podcasts or your kid.

3039
02:57:12.479 --> 02:57:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, if you look up my old podcasts where I

3040
02:57:14.959 --> 02:57:21.239
<v Speaker 4>just contrast, there's one called Vatican one refutes Catholicism, and

3041
02:57:21.360 --> 02:57:26.079
<v Speaker 4>then Vatican one for his Orthodoxy, Vatican one versus Vatican two.

3042
02:57:26.479 --> 02:57:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Like some of those really just lay out the things

3043
02:57:28.799 --> 02:57:31.399
<v Speaker 4>that led me out of Roman Catholicism. But I mean

3044
02:57:31.559 --> 02:57:34.479
<v Speaker 4>for me, that was a really long process throughout my twenties.

3045
02:57:34.559 --> 02:57:36.399
<v Speaker 4>So I became Roman Catholic in twenty three when I

3046
02:57:36.479 --> 02:57:39.000
<v Speaker 4>was like twenty one, two thousand and three, when I

3047
02:57:39.079 --> 02:57:42.120
<v Speaker 4>was like twenty one, and then maybe maybe twenty three

3048
02:57:42.200 --> 02:57:45.200
<v Speaker 4>somewhere in there, and then for most of my twenties

3049
02:57:45.280 --> 02:57:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I was like, you know, hardcore Tomas Catholic tradcat going

3050
02:57:49.159 --> 02:57:54.239
<v Speaker 4>to Latin Mass, and then the Vatican two issues were

3051
02:57:54.280 --> 02:57:56.040
<v Speaker 4>a big thing, and then I just kept you know,

3052
02:57:56.120 --> 02:57:59.920
<v Speaker 4>going deeper and deeper into reading Danzinger, reading the papal documents,

3053
02:58:00.079 --> 02:58:04.760
<v Speaker 4>reading the encyclicals. And I left Rome I would say

3054
02:58:04.799 --> 02:58:09.000
<v Speaker 4>about two thousand and seven or eight. I was still

3055
02:58:09.040 --> 02:58:12.920
<v Speaker 4>iffy about you know, I wasn't ready to go to Orthodoxy.

3056
02:58:13.120 --> 02:58:15.600
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't ready. I didn't want to go back to Protestanism.

3057
02:58:16.200 --> 02:58:17.799
<v Speaker 4>So I was just kind of in a limbo state

3058
02:58:17.879 --> 02:58:21.879
<v Speaker 4>for a while for a few years. But it was

3059
02:58:21.959 --> 02:58:25.360
<v Speaker 4>a process of you know, reading and reading and reading

3060
02:58:25.399 --> 02:58:29.719
<v Speaker 4>and also seeing Rome on the ground and you know, seeing.

3061
02:58:29.680 --> 02:58:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Like in person, like just constant gay priests, gay orders.

3062
02:58:35.719 --> 02:58:36.920
<v Speaker 3>The Dominicans are all gay.

3063
02:58:37.239 --> 02:58:39.319
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's just like when you see it on

3064
02:58:39.399 --> 02:58:41.120
<v Speaker 4>the ground, it's way worse like going to you go

3065
02:58:41.239 --> 02:58:44.520
<v Speaker 4>to hip hop masses, you go to like clown masses,

3066
02:58:44.760 --> 02:58:46.920
<v Speaker 4>and you see it's just like you got to see

3067
02:58:46.920 --> 02:58:49.040
<v Speaker 4>it on the ground. Sometimes people don't believe until they

3068
02:58:49.079 --> 02:58:52.440
<v Speaker 4>go see it and then and then you know, contrast

3069
02:58:52.600 --> 02:58:54.799
<v Speaker 4>just just the worship I think was a huge one too,

3070
02:58:54.920 --> 02:58:59.600
<v Speaker 4>because you know, Francis has been persecuting the Latin Mass.

3071
02:59:00.479 --> 02:59:03.120
<v Speaker 4>It was even under rat singer. It was so hard

3072
02:59:03.200 --> 02:59:05.200
<v Speaker 4>to find Latin masses to go to, so I was

3073
02:59:05.239 --> 02:59:09.559
<v Speaker 4>going to the SSPX Mass and then you go to

3074
02:59:09.959 --> 02:59:12.280
<v Speaker 4>an Orthodox Church service and it's like, well, this is

3075
02:59:12.399 --> 02:59:17.440
<v Speaker 4>like reveren, Why can't the Roman Calloy Church even maintain

3076
02:59:17.559 --> 02:59:19.879
<v Speaker 4>their liturgy? If they're like, if this is the true church,

3077
02:59:20.360 --> 02:59:23.239
<v Speaker 4>they should at least be able to maintain just the

3078
02:59:23.319 --> 02:59:24.440
<v Speaker 4>basic divine liturgy.

3079
02:59:25.239 --> 02:59:25.479
<v Speaker 25>Yeah.

3080
02:59:25.719 --> 02:59:27.600
<v Speaker 61>Yeah, I go to Latin Mass on Sundays, but then

3081
02:59:27.680 --> 02:59:30.360
<v Speaker 61>during the week I perish near me. It's a very

3082
02:59:30.440 --> 02:59:33.159
<v Speaker 61>good parish. I somewhat insulated. I understand what you're saying

3083
02:59:33.159 --> 02:59:35.120
<v Speaker 61>about getting on the ground and like the gay priests,

3084
02:59:35.879 --> 02:59:37.440
<v Speaker 61>and I guess like when I get online, I see

3085
02:59:37.479 --> 02:59:38.440
<v Speaker 61>some of that stuff and it just.

3086
02:59:40.399 --> 02:59:41.399
<v Speaker 47>Makes my stomach turn.

3087
02:59:41.520 --> 02:59:42.840
<v Speaker 61>So I really appreciate you.

3088
02:59:43.079 --> 02:59:45.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, I don't mean to say that like the decision

3089
02:59:46.159 --> 02:59:48.719
<v Speaker 4>was based on like who has more gay priests, because

3090
02:59:48.760 --> 02:59:52.120
<v Speaker 4>there's corrupt, evil priests and bishops and the Orthodox Church too.

3091
02:59:53.159 --> 02:59:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Now for me, the decision was literally all based on

3092
02:59:55.879 --> 02:59:59.079
<v Speaker 4>the theology and the argumentation. I'm just saying that when

3093
02:59:59.159 --> 03:00:01.280
<v Speaker 4>I was roaming cats, like, I really was, you know,

3094
03:00:01.440 --> 03:00:05.559
<v Speaker 4>committed to it. But the on the ground world of

3095
03:00:05.639 --> 03:00:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Roman Catholicism really eventually beats you down and you get

3096
03:00:08.959 --> 03:00:12.760
<v Speaker 4>really dejected about it, and that was part of what

3097
03:00:13.040 --> 03:00:17.120
<v Speaker 4>got me looking into other options. But I'm not saying that,

3098
03:00:17.200 --> 03:00:20.000
<v Speaker 4>oh I converted because there's gaybris No, that's not my argument.

3099
03:00:20.040 --> 03:00:21.799
<v Speaker 61>Yeah, no, that's interesting. I mean I'm committed.

3100
03:00:21.840 --> 03:00:22.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm not.

3101
03:00:22.159 --> 03:00:24.479
<v Speaker 61>I don't have plans to good Orthodoxy, though it seems

3102
03:00:24.559 --> 03:00:31.319
<v Speaker 61>that very cool right now, but I just like learning about,

3103
03:00:31.719 --> 03:00:34.920
<v Speaker 61>you know, Orthodoxy, all religions.

3104
03:00:35.000 --> 03:00:39.280
<v Speaker 4>But uh, well, look, I would say here's three easy contradictions.

3105
03:00:39.319 --> 03:00:41.799
<v Speaker 4>And I mean Roman Catholicism is premise that on the

3106
03:00:42.079 --> 03:00:45.399
<v Speaker 4>idea that dogma can't contradict. And I can give you

3107
03:00:45.559 --> 03:00:51.239
<v Speaker 4>three explicit dogmatic contradictions. Number one, unam Sanctum teaches that

3108
03:00:52.079 --> 03:00:55.440
<v Speaker 4>you have to submit to and believe in the temporal

3109
03:00:55.520 --> 03:00:58.600
<v Speaker 4>supremacy of the Roman bishops, which means that he is

3110
03:00:58.680 --> 03:01:02.840
<v Speaker 4>also a world rule and can call standing armies.

3111
03:01:02.559 --> 03:01:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Et cetera.

3112
03:01:03.760 --> 03:01:08.399
<v Speaker 4>That belief was necessary up until Vatican two, and it's

3113
03:01:08.479 --> 03:01:10.760
<v Speaker 4>no longer a necessary, but that to me is a

3114
03:01:10.840 --> 03:01:16.399
<v Speaker 4>dogmatic contradiction. Number two, Francis has changed the Roman Cathoity

3115
03:01:16.479 --> 03:01:19.639
<v Speaker 4>churches teaching on the death penalty, not just to get

3116
03:01:19.680 --> 03:01:21.280
<v Speaker 4>away with it, but he actually says that it is

3117
03:01:21.479 --> 03:01:24.799
<v Speaker 4>contrary to the Gospel. Yeah, the Roman catholt Church saw

3118
03:01:24.920 --> 03:01:29.959
<v Speaker 4>the death penalty for you know, countless from the beginning

3119
03:01:30.159 --> 03:01:30.680
<v Speaker 4>pretty much.

3120
03:01:31.399 --> 03:01:34.600
<v Speaker 3>So those are contradictions. I would also argue that.

3121
03:01:37.639 --> 03:01:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Even within Catholicism, like the giving of a blessing to

3122
03:01:43.079 --> 03:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>gay couples, and I know that it's not gay marriage,

3123
03:01:46.879 --> 03:01:50.559
<v Speaker 4>but the blessing of a gay couple is the opposite

3124
03:01:50.719 --> 03:01:54.680
<v Speaker 4>directive that the Holy Office gave in two thousand and

3125
03:01:54.799 --> 03:01:55.799
<v Speaker 4>three under rat Singer.

3126
03:01:55.959 --> 03:01:57.360
<v Speaker 3>So those are direct contradictions.

3127
03:01:58.239 --> 03:02:00.280
<v Speaker 56>Yeah, I do get that.

3128
03:02:00.440 --> 03:02:03.879
<v Speaker 61>And I have some friends who are actually way more

3129
03:02:03.920 --> 03:02:06.280
<v Speaker 61>traditional than I am, and they basically just say, like, look,

3130
03:02:06.719 --> 03:02:11.079
<v Speaker 61>Vatican two is invalid, and also Francis is the anti pope,

3131
03:02:11.120 --> 03:02:12.760
<v Speaker 61>so we're just gonna wait it out, like we are

3132
03:02:12.799 --> 03:02:13.959
<v Speaker 61>the ones your church.

3133
03:02:14.719 --> 03:02:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I have a talk on that. It's called a

3134
03:02:17.479 --> 03:02:19.360
<v Speaker 4>set of a contism for his orthodoxy.

3135
03:02:19.520 --> 03:02:21.879
<v Speaker 3>So I look it up. I would say, watch watch

3136
03:02:21.959 --> 03:02:23.799
<v Speaker 3>that talk because I deal with that whole.

3137
03:02:24.120 --> 03:02:24.479
<v Speaker 44>Look it up.

3138
03:02:24.479 --> 03:02:25.360
<v Speaker 61>Thank you so much for your time.

3139
03:02:31.600 --> 03:02:44.879
<v Speaker 3>Yes, thank you. Great questions, Doctor Thomas Raspberry Gotta I'm mute.

3140
03:02:48.840 --> 03:02:53.319
<v Speaker 62>You had a quick question in regards to the previous

3141
03:02:53.440 --> 03:02:59.399
<v Speaker 62>caller and trying to figure out what the temporal nature

3142
03:02:59.440 --> 03:03:02.479
<v Speaker 62>of the paper is. He so claimed was at the

3143
03:03:02.520 --> 03:03:05.799
<v Speaker 62>beginning of the first near the beginning of the first millennia,

3144
03:03:06.639 --> 03:03:10.440
<v Speaker 62>I know that the papal states were a thing, and

3145
03:03:10.559 --> 03:03:14.840
<v Speaker 62>I was wondering maybe if that statement from that particular

3146
03:03:14.920 --> 03:03:19.000
<v Speaker 62>pope was in regards to his control over the papal

3147
03:03:19.079 --> 03:03:23.760
<v Speaker 62>states and his getting the Holy Roman Emperor in line.

3148
03:03:23.799 --> 03:03:25.879
<v Speaker 10>And you know how he says, as the.

3149
03:03:26.559 --> 03:03:28.760
<v Speaker 62>Moon reflects the light of the sun, so too, there's

3150
03:03:28.799 --> 03:03:36.719
<v Speaker 62>a Holy Roman Emperor reflect you know, the divine light, Yeah,

3151
03:03:39.040 --> 03:03:41.719
<v Speaker 62>shown on the pope or something like that. I don't

3152
03:03:41.760 --> 03:03:45.120
<v Speaker 62>know exactly what the words are, but it's something similar

3153
03:03:45.200 --> 03:03:48.200
<v Speaker 62>to that. So is that particular to the time when

3154
03:03:48.440 --> 03:03:49.719
<v Speaker 62>the papal states existed?

3155
03:03:52.680 --> 03:03:55.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the papal states that have an existence

3156
03:03:55.319 --> 03:03:58.600
<v Speaker 4>prior to when I'm signed them. But the issue is

3157
03:03:58.680 --> 03:04:03.079
<v Speaker 4>not you know, and the Church, you know, have large

3158
03:04:03.159 --> 03:04:05.680
<v Speaker 4>elements of property in this kind of stuff. If you

3159
03:04:05.719 --> 03:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>look at the Canons of Chalcidon, it's forbidden in the

3160
03:04:08.239 --> 03:04:13.360
<v Speaker 4>canons for a cleric to have a civil role, and

3161
03:04:13.520 --> 03:04:19.319
<v Speaker 4>so this is a fissure of a separation between Church

3162
03:04:19.360 --> 03:04:22.319
<v Speaker 4>and state, even in the situation of Symphonia. And the

3163
03:04:22.440 --> 03:04:25.760
<v Speaker 4>problem is that if you read the Papadocus Mayandorf book

3164
03:04:26.159 --> 03:04:28.760
<v Speaker 4>on the rise of the papacy from one thousand to

3165
03:04:28.879 --> 03:04:32.159
<v Speaker 4>fourteen hundred in the West, they argue that there's a

3166
03:04:32.159 --> 03:04:34.360
<v Speaker 4>whole bunch of things that pop off in under the

3167
03:04:34.399 --> 03:04:37.639
<v Speaker 4>Gregorian reforms that are distinct even beyond.

3168
03:04:37.479 --> 03:04:38.600
<v Speaker 3>The notion of a papal state.

3169
03:04:38.639 --> 03:04:42.559
<v Speaker 4>It's one of those, for example, is the military monastic

3170
03:04:42.760 --> 03:04:44.040
<v Speaker 4>orders that fight for the pope.

3171
03:04:44.559 --> 03:04:45.879
<v Speaker 3>That's something that's completely new.

3172
03:04:45.959 --> 03:04:51.479
<v Speaker 4>It never existed, and they rightly point out that clearly

3173
03:04:51.680 --> 03:04:54.559
<v Speaker 4>there was a geopolitical motivation for the papacy to do

3174
03:04:54.639 --> 03:04:57.360
<v Speaker 4>this under the Gregoing reforms and to approve those orders. Now,

3175
03:04:57.600 --> 03:04:59.559
<v Speaker 4>I understand that there they would argue, well, this is

3176
03:04:59.600 --> 03:05:01.200
<v Speaker 4>part of the to Holy Land and all that.

3177
03:05:01.879 --> 03:05:02.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

3178
03:05:02.319 --> 03:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>But the problem is that even if there might have

3179
03:05:04.520 --> 03:05:08.840
<v Speaker 4>been extenuating circumstances, it goes against canon law in terms

3180
03:05:08.879 --> 03:05:12.120
<v Speaker 4>of what monastics are allowed to do. Monastics do not

3181
03:05:12.319 --> 03:05:17.000
<v Speaker 4>engage in fighting in battle. And then beyond that, the

3182
03:05:17.440 --> 03:05:22.159
<v Speaker 4>Dictatus pope document is the first explicit extreme statement about

3183
03:05:22.239 --> 03:05:25.000
<v Speaker 4>the pope being a world ruler. No, this is not

3184
03:05:25.319 --> 03:05:28.639
<v Speaker 4>just large scale property or even defense of his property.

3185
03:05:28.799 --> 03:05:33.639
<v Speaker 4>This is the papacy being able to call standing armies,

3186
03:05:34.440 --> 03:05:39.040
<v Speaker 4>go to war and excommunicate princes that don't fight in

3187
03:05:39.120 --> 03:05:43.079
<v Speaker 4>his defense. That's all totally foreign to the first millennium.

3188
03:05:43.719 --> 03:05:45.680
<v Speaker 4>And it was also backed up, by the way, with

3189
03:05:45.840 --> 03:05:47.680
<v Speaker 4>some of the forgeries, so you had the usage of

3190
03:05:47.719 --> 03:05:49.639
<v Speaker 4>the donation of Constantine to back up some of this.

3191
03:05:50.200 --> 03:05:53.200
<v Speaker 4>And if you read when I'm Sanctum, the argumentation is, actually,

3192
03:05:53.639 --> 03:05:56.000
<v Speaker 4>it's not even so much about like warfare and battles.

3193
03:05:56.000 --> 03:05:57.040
<v Speaker 3>It's really absurd.

3194
03:05:57.120 --> 03:06:00.600
<v Speaker 4>It's like it just cites Jeremiah about I have set

3195
03:06:00.680 --> 03:06:04.600
<v Speaker 4>you above all kingdoms to read out and to destroy,

3196
03:06:05.360 --> 03:06:08.440
<v Speaker 4>and the papacy says, that's about us, because we're the

3197
03:06:08.559 --> 03:06:10.479
<v Speaker 4>head of the world, and if we're the head of

3198
03:06:10.520 --> 03:06:12.879
<v Speaker 4>the church, and if the church is superior to the rulers,

3199
03:06:13.200 --> 03:06:15.520
<v Speaker 4>then we're the head of all rulers, right, So it's

3200
03:06:15.600 --> 03:06:20.559
<v Speaker 4>just preposterous, you know, logic there. And the argument is

3201
03:06:20.600 --> 03:06:23.600
<v Speaker 4>that even if you could justify that like historically, and

3202
03:06:23.719 --> 03:06:25.840
<v Speaker 4>even if we gave the papacy an excuse for all that,

3203
03:06:26.719 --> 03:06:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Vatican too has like discarded that. So that means there's

3204
03:06:29.479 --> 03:06:31.559
<v Speaker 4>a change in dogma. If you read it when I'm sunktum.

3205
03:06:32.239 --> 03:06:35.440
<v Speaker 4>It's not just saying no salvationals the church. It's saying

3206
03:06:35.600 --> 03:06:37.239
<v Speaker 4>you must also believe.

3207
03:06:36.920 --> 03:06:39.360
<v Speaker 3>In the temporal supremacy of the Roman Bishop to be saved.

3208
03:06:41.079 --> 03:06:42.559
<v Speaker 62>Right, all right, thanks so much.

3209
03:06:42.559 --> 03:06:48.239
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate it. Thank you, doctor Thomas. Appreciate your your

3210
03:06:48.520 --> 03:06:49.959
<v Speaker 3>presence and your good question.

3211
03:06:51.479 --> 03:08:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Emmanuel, Adrian Emanual whoever can connect, I guess nobody can connect. Balance.

3212
03:08:13.959 --> 03:08:15.479
<v Speaker 4>We've already done your questions. Is not trying to be

3213
03:08:15.559 --> 03:08:16.719
<v Speaker 4>rude to you, but we want to move on to

3214
03:08:16.799 --> 03:08:17.440
<v Speaker 4>some other people.

3215
03:08:20.479 --> 03:08:25.479
<v Speaker 3>We've got a long drive, so I mean, do a

3216
03:08:25.520 --> 03:08:27.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit more. We've been going for a good while.

3217
03:08:28.200 --> 03:08:34.719
<v Speaker 4>Any questions, challenges, discussions regarding Calvinism, processes with Catholicism, Islam, atheism.

3218
03:08:35.479 --> 03:08:37.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you're a Muslim coming up, know that

3219
03:08:37.680 --> 03:08:41.479
<v Speaker 4>we already kind of are aware of the arguments, so

3220
03:08:41.559 --> 03:08:43.760
<v Speaker 4>you don't have to walk us through saying we know

3221
03:08:43.920 --> 03:08:45.879
<v Speaker 4>that you think the Koran is the word of all lot.

3222
03:08:45.920 --> 03:08:48.079
<v Speaker 3>We know all that. And I'm going to ask you

3223
03:08:48.159 --> 03:08:51.000
<v Speaker 3>about the Islamic dilemma, so know that ahead of time.

3224
03:08:51.440 --> 03:08:54.000
<v Speaker 3>And if you can't restate what the Islamic dilemma is

3225
03:08:55.680 --> 03:08:56.600
<v Speaker 3>just don't even come up.

3226
03:08:56.600 --> 03:08:58.239
<v Speaker 4>It's not worth anybody's time because we don't want to

3227
03:08:58.239 --> 03:09:01.319
<v Speaker 4>go through this whole process of like explaining it to

3228
03:09:01.440 --> 03:09:03.079
<v Speaker 4>you and then you don't know what it is, and

3229
03:09:03.159 --> 03:09:05.440
<v Speaker 4>then you just keep repeating what the Koran.

3230
03:09:05.200 --> 03:09:10.239
<v Speaker 3>Says, which is not a debate. If you can restate

3231
03:09:10.760 --> 03:09:13.479
<v Speaker 3>the Islamic dilemma, even if you disagree with it, if

3232
03:09:13.559 --> 03:09:17.520
<v Speaker 3>you have the capabilities to restate it, I will welcome you.

3233
03:09:17.639 --> 03:09:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Up to the microphone. You can come and be first.

3234
03:09:23.639 --> 03:09:26.479
<v Speaker 4>We still got what well, we got more people than earlier.

3235
03:09:26.520 --> 03:09:28.639
<v Speaker 4>We got over three hundred, three hundred and thirteen people.

3236
03:09:30.719 --> 03:09:34.120
<v Speaker 4>And that atheist guy was something else. And it's always

3237
03:09:34.200 --> 03:09:37.200
<v Speaker 4>like the thing that it's annoying too when people won't

3238
03:09:37.239 --> 03:09:38.680
<v Speaker 4>debate their actual position.

3239
03:09:39.079 --> 03:09:41.520
<v Speaker 3>That's annoying when they're like, oh, well, I'm not going

3240
03:09:41.600 --> 03:09:44.040
<v Speaker 3>to say what my position is, but I'm going to

3241
03:09:44.120 --> 03:09:46.239
<v Speaker 3>argue in bad faith from all these other positions.

3242
03:09:46.719 --> 03:09:50.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, it is a debate room, but kind

3243
03:09:50.639 --> 03:09:52.360
<v Speaker 4>of the assumption here is that you're going to debate

3244
03:09:52.399 --> 03:09:55.360
<v Speaker 4>the actual position you have, not pretending to have a

3245
03:09:55.399 --> 03:09:58.680
<v Speaker 4>bunch of positions. And atheists love to do that too,

3246
03:09:58.719 --> 03:10:01.799
<v Speaker 4>because they can like jump between positions. When they get refuted,

3247
03:10:01.840 --> 03:10:03.879
<v Speaker 4>they can just switch to another position that they don't

3248
03:10:03.879 --> 03:10:04.239
<v Speaker 4>actually have.

3249
03:10:05.120 --> 03:10:07.479
<v Speaker 3>So it's a kind of a classic bad faith tactic.

3250
03:10:07.840 --> 03:10:09.200
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Muslims are doing this too.

3251
03:10:09.280 --> 03:10:12.399
<v Speaker 4>When we were on the God Logic extreme debating, all

3252
03:10:12.399 --> 03:10:15.159
<v Speaker 4>the Muslims, a bunch of them were doing this too,

3253
03:10:15.200 --> 03:10:18.520
<v Speaker 4>where they act like they're Orthodoxic inquirers or they're interested

3254
03:10:18.559 --> 03:10:20.879
<v Speaker 4>in some position, or they'll say they're atheists, and then

3255
03:10:20.920 --> 03:10:23.639
<v Speaker 4>they start arguing Islam just to get in there to

3256
03:10:23.760 --> 03:10:26.760
<v Speaker 4>argue their stupid positions. It's like, it's just a weird

3257
03:10:26.959 --> 03:10:30.319
<v Speaker 4>thing to want to bad faith argue a position that

3258
03:10:30.399 --> 03:10:34.319
<v Speaker 4>you don't have. But it's actually a tactic because it's

3259
03:10:34.360 --> 03:10:38.000
<v Speaker 4>a way to just change your position mid debate. Well,

3260
03:10:38.040 --> 03:10:40.079
<v Speaker 4>I don't know actually believe that. And that's exactly what

3261
03:10:40.200 --> 03:10:42.319
<v Speaker 4>that guy did. You notice how snaky that was, right?

3262
03:10:42.399 --> 03:10:45.639
<v Speaker 4>He was like he was all cordial and it's like, oh, well,

3263
03:10:45.680 --> 03:10:50.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm a Christian, but is the Son of God really

3264
03:10:50.920 --> 03:10:53.040
<v Speaker 4>essential to Christianity. It's like, well, wait a minute, I

3265
03:10:53.079 --> 03:10:54.840
<v Speaker 4>thought you were a Christian, so you were an atheist

3266
03:10:54.959 --> 03:10:58.440
<v Speaker 4>like ten minutes ago. Well, I am a Christian, but

3267
03:10:58.799 --> 03:11:01.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to argue much field, Well you sound

3268
03:11:01.719 --> 03:11:04.920
<v Speaker 4>like an atheist, so like what so see, this is

3269
03:11:04.959 --> 03:11:07.319
<v Speaker 4>a this is a thing where we were kind of

3270
03:11:07.319 --> 03:11:10.159
<v Speaker 4>ahead of the game when you know, people were saying

3271
03:11:10.159 --> 03:11:12.639
<v Speaker 4>we were being quote mean and really heavy handed on

3272
03:11:12.760 --> 03:11:13.200
<v Speaker 4>this stuff.

3273
03:11:14.200 --> 03:11:17.159
<v Speaker 3>Like it doesn't take long to figure out when people

3274
03:11:17.159 --> 03:11:20.559
<v Speaker 3>are not really being a good faith debater and to

3275
03:11:20.719 --> 03:11:23.319
<v Speaker 3>god logics credit Like he spotted that Muslim dude within

3276
03:11:23.440 --> 03:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>like ten seconds, He's like, no, he's not.

3277
03:11:27.040 --> 03:11:32.000
<v Speaker 4>He's not really atheists. He's a Muslim. So this kind

3278
03:11:32.000 --> 03:11:33.360
<v Speaker 4>of stuff doesn't really work.

3279
03:11:36.079 --> 03:11:37.000
<v Speaker 3>At least not with us.

3280
03:11:37.079 --> 03:11:39.079
<v Speaker 4>I think we can like sniff this stuff out within

3281
03:11:39.319 --> 03:11:42.639
<v Speaker 4>no time. But if you have an actual position that

3282
03:11:42.680 --> 03:11:45.200
<v Speaker 4>you'd like to discuss or defend, you're.

3283
03:11:45.079 --> 03:11:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to come up. I will bring you up. We've

3284
03:11:48.479 --> 03:11:50.440
<v Speaker 3>got over three hundred people in here, and that's great.

3285
03:11:50.920 --> 03:11:52.799
<v Speaker 3>These spaces used to get a hundred. Now they get

3286
03:11:53.600 --> 03:11:55.319
<v Speaker 3>sometimes four hundred, five hundred.

3287
03:11:55.399 --> 03:11:59.159
<v Speaker 4>So anybody want to discuss Calvin hasn't protestism with alicism,

3288
03:11:59.280 --> 03:12:00.239
<v Speaker 4>Islam atheist them.

3289
03:12:01.520 --> 03:12:03.959
<v Speaker 3>We have a shout out to Father Degan and Ias.

3290
03:12:04.520 --> 03:12:08.760
<v Speaker 4>We have a beautiful Tristanna, our favorite trans individual on

3291
03:12:08.840 --> 03:12:13.079
<v Speaker 4>the chat. Some people think that she's the Antichrist. I

3292
03:12:13.159 --> 03:12:17.200
<v Speaker 4>think that's a little overboard. A lot of vegans are beginning.

3293
03:12:16.879 --> 03:12:17.239
<v Speaker 3>To think this.

3294
03:12:18.399 --> 03:12:20.799
<v Speaker 4>Uh, there's not really hard evidence for this, but I

3295
03:12:20.879 --> 03:12:24.120
<v Speaker 4>support her. Even if she is the Antichrist, she would

3296
03:12:24.120 --> 03:12:28.399
<v Speaker 4>be the first female trans antichrist. Trans transit transity christ

3297
03:12:29.120 --> 03:12:32.239
<v Speaker 4>and Shout out to Rachel's in the chat. Shout out

3298
03:12:32.280 --> 03:12:36.959
<v Speaker 4>to slowboly white Board. Shout out to Jubb, Shout out

3299
03:12:37.040 --> 03:12:42.959
<v Speaker 4>to Melkite, Shout out to not Chase Haggard, who I'm

3300
03:12:43.000 --> 03:12:46.440
<v Speaker 4>sure is all is literally not Chase Haggard. Shout out

3301
03:12:46.440 --> 03:12:49.959
<v Speaker 4>to Vaklav, Shout out to ac. We've got a bunch

3302
03:12:50.000 --> 03:12:52.719
<v Speaker 4>of our friends in the chat. What's up, Father Degan,

3303
03:12:52.719 --> 03:12:53.680
<v Speaker 4>and I as what's on your mind?

3304
03:13:04.799 --> 03:13:15.319
<v Speaker 3>You got to unmute. I'm mute, dude, FDA, you gotta

3305
03:13:15.360 --> 03:13:16.159
<v Speaker 3>ut if you want to talk.

3306
03:13:16.360 --> 03:13:19.239
<v Speaker 8>Oh, I didn't really want to talk, but just your

3307
03:13:19.680 --> 03:13:21.200
<v Speaker 8>ummute dude, I'm unmuted.

3308
03:13:21.479 --> 03:13:23.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I thought you wanted to You requested to speak,

3309
03:13:23.360 --> 03:13:26.399
<v Speaker 3>You requested to speak to not speak? Yeah, that you

3310
03:13:26.520 --> 03:13:26.840
<v Speaker 3>got me.

3311
03:13:29.280 --> 03:13:34.079
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I'm just waiting for some good questions and debates.

3312
03:13:34.319 --> 03:13:36.799
<v Speaker 8>And uh, I'm sorry I missed the atheist guy.

3313
03:13:36.840 --> 03:13:40.760
<v Speaker 63>I don't know what his argument was, well, uh, it's

3314
03:13:40.799 --> 03:13:43.840
<v Speaker 63>actually something you pointed out before, where you know a

3315
03:13:43.920 --> 03:13:47.200
<v Speaker 63>lot of atheists will kind of like not say their

3316
03:13:47.239 --> 03:13:49.760
<v Speaker 63>position so that they can hop into a bunch of

3317
03:13:49.799 --> 03:13:50.600
<v Speaker 63>different positions.

3318
03:13:51.399 --> 03:13:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh interesting, have you noticed that?

3319
03:13:57.239 --> 03:13:59.600
<v Speaker 8>Well don't they actually even say to you, I don't

3320
03:13:59.639 --> 03:14:05.399
<v Speaker 8>have a position? Atheism is not a position? Yeah, pretty

3321
03:14:05.479 --> 03:14:07.959
<v Speaker 8>much the onus is on you. Remember that was even

3322
03:14:10.120 --> 03:14:14.079
<v Speaker 8>uh Stein tried that move on Bonnson in the famous debate.

3323
03:14:16.360 --> 03:14:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, he did.

3324
03:14:17.159 --> 03:14:19.840
<v Speaker 8>You're right, Yeah, which is fine.

3325
03:14:20.000 --> 03:14:20.479
<v Speaker 25>I mean.

3326
03:14:22.520 --> 03:14:24.920
<v Speaker 8>That you could say atheism itself is not position, but

3327
03:14:25.120 --> 03:14:28.760
<v Speaker 8>it entails positions. So let's look at those, like, you're

3328
03:14:29.719 --> 03:14:34.200
<v Speaker 8>not positionless, So what's what's your position?

3329
03:14:35.639 --> 03:14:37.959
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that goes along with assumed neutrality like

3330
03:14:38.040 --> 03:14:40.000
<v Speaker 4>they actually think, no, I'm just actually super neutral.

3331
03:14:40.040 --> 03:14:40.959
<v Speaker 3>I have no position, no.

3332
03:14:41.000 --> 03:14:43.680
<v Speaker 8>Com Yeah, well I think Stein pointed that out too,

3333
03:14:44.319 --> 03:14:48.040
<v Speaker 8>because he made a bunch of positions about what qualifies

3334
03:14:48.079 --> 03:14:51.959
<v Speaker 8>as evidence and proof and stuff like that, and uh.

3335
03:14:53.600 --> 03:14:53.639
<v Speaker 3>That.

3336
03:14:55.200 --> 03:15:00.159
<v Speaker 8>Boson's response was, yeah, well it depends the way that

3337
03:15:00.239 --> 03:15:04.639
<v Speaker 8>you verify history versus you know, that was the crackers

3338
03:15:04.680 --> 03:15:07.280
<v Speaker 8>in the pantry fallacy. But you obviously do have pre

3339
03:15:07.440 --> 03:15:15.360
<v Speaker 8>commitments and certainly your atheist worldview will inform that. I mean,

3340
03:15:15.399 --> 03:15:19.479
<v Speaker 8>that's crazy to Actually it's it's not crazy, it's disingenuous.

3341
03:15:19.520 --> 03:15:22.680
<v Speaker 6>Actually, well the.

3342
03:15:22.680 --> 03:15:26.079
<v Speaker 3>Guy, that guy was pretty pretty honest about being disingenuous. Yeah,

3343
03:15:26.120 --> 03:15:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to debate my position. I'm going to

3344
03:15:27.639 --> 03:15:30.079
<v Speaker 3>debate a bunch of other posiness. No, we don't really

3345
03:15:30.120 --> 03:15:30.319
<v Speaker 3>do that.

3346
03:15:32.680 --> 03:15:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean if you take debate class, you know

3347
03:15:37.520 --> 03:15:40.639
<v Speaker 4>they'll make you, as part of your course, argue the

3348
03:15:40.719 --> 03:15:43.000
<v Speaker 4>positions that you don't hold and so that you learned

3349
03:15:43.000 --> 03:15:45.600
<v Speaker 4>to Steelman. Well, that's not really what we're doing here.

3350
03:15:51.440 --> 03:15:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Do you ever do you ever do that with students

3351
03:15:53.159 --> 03:15:56.200
<v Speaker 4>where you tell them like, Okay, you're gonna argue for

3352
03:15:56.239 --> 03:15:58.440
<v Speaker 4>the sake of argument a position that you don't hold,

3353
03:15:59.239 --> 03:16:01.399
<v Speaker 4>so that you learn you know their position and how

3354
03:16:01.440 --> 03:16:02.079
<v Speaker 4>to steal man.

3355
03:16:02.040 --> 03:16:04.600
<v Speaker 3>It sort of.

3356
03:16:04.760 --> 03:16:09.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we don't really have that much time in

3357
03:16:09.959 --> 03:16:13.600
<v Speaker 8>the semester to actually do like debates itself. But what

3358
03:16:13.760 --> 03:16:16.520
<v Speaker 8>I what I do try to do when we steal

3359
03:16:16.639 --> 03:16:21.159
<v Speaker 8>man an argument, we're just going over a queus and

3360
03:16:21.239 --> 03:16:24.120
<v Speaker 8>it's harder for the first year like freshmen, they're just

3361
03:16:24.559 --> 03:16:27.959
<v Speaker 8>they're just blank stares, like they don't know how I

3362
03:16:28.040 --> 03:16:30.879
<v Speaker 8>think a lot of it's they're insecure, they're afraid to

3363
03:16:30.920 --> 03:16:32.680
<v Speaker 8>say something. But what I try to get them do

3364
03:16:32.920 --> 03:16:36.120
<v Speaker 8>is like, well, what would you say, Like, let's what

3365
03:16:36.159 --> 03:16:41.840
<v Speaker 8>would a counter argument be to this? And how would

3366
03:16:41.879 --> 03:16:43.840
<v Speaker 8>you respond to I try to give them to do that.

3367
03:16:44.559 --> 03:16:46.680
<v Speaker 8>It's like you don't actually have to believe that, but

3368
03:16:46.879 --> 03:16:50.319
<v Speaker 8>you should be thinking like, well, if I was the opponent,

3369
03:16:50.520 --> 03:16:51.200
<v Speaker 8>I would say this.

3370
03:16:51.600 --> 03:16:52.959
<v Speaker 3>And occasionally.

3371
03:16:53.920 --> 03:16:57.959
<v Speaker 8>Students like freshmens will get you know, upperclassmen get that

3372
03:16:58.360 --> 03:17:01.399
<v Speaker 8>real well, they've taken philosophy classes and stuff, and so

3373
03:17:01.600 --> 03:17:05.079
<v Speaker 8>they'll try to formulate counterposition and then a response to

3374
03:17:05.200 --> 03:17:07.840
<v Speaker 8>that and stuff like that. But I mean, that's philosophy.

3375
03:17:07.840 --> 03:17:11.719
<v Speaker 8>Even when you're writing papers, right, you try to think like, okay,

3376
03:17:11.760 --> 03:17:14.360
<v Speaker 8>we would be the best objection to this, and how

3377
03:17:14.399 --> 03:17:18.479
<v Speaker 8>would I formulate that? Yeah, it's just dialectics.

3378
03:17:22.440 --> 03:17:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this is a but it's a really difficult skill

3379
03:17:26.000 --> 03:17:30.159
<v Speaker 4>or thing for a lot of people. A lot of people,

3380
03:17:30.959 --> 03:17:33.040
<v Speaker 4>I guess just maybe out of laziness, like they don't

3381
03:17:33.040 --> 03:17:35.920
<v Speaker 4>want to actually deal with the other positions best argument.

3382
03:17:36.000 --> 03:17:39.239
<v Speaker 4>It's just a lot easier to straw man it or

3383
03:17:39.319 --> 03:17:41.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, make it sound like it's something that is

3384
03:17:41.079 --> 03:17:44.479
<v Speaker 4>not to knock down, you know, a fake thing, farm boy?

3385
03:17:44.559 --> 03:17:50.159
<v Speaker 3>What's that meant? I'm you.

3386
03:17:54.639 --> 03:18:01.239
<v Speaker 56>About the word theosis and where that word from, as

3387
03:18:01.319 --> 03:18:04.879
<v Speaker 56>in the etymology, how did the Greek and Eastern Church

3388
03:18:05.719 --> 03:18:10.200
<v Speaker 56>arrive at that word versus our English word sanctification. Curious

3389
03:18:10.840 --> 03:18:14.920
<v Speaker 56>about that, particularly if that word's in the Greek New

3390
03:18:15.000 --> 03:18:17.600
<v Speaker 56>Testament and where it ultimately comes from.

3391
03:18:17.799 --> 03:18:18.040
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

3392
03:18:20.799 --> 03:18:22.159
<v Speaker 3>It's a good question. Off the top of my head.

3393
03:18:22.159 --> 03:18:24.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure if the New Testament ever uses the

3394
03:18:24.920 --> 03:18:27.719
<v Speaker 4>word theosis. It does talk about us partaking of the

3395
03:18:27.760 --> 03:18:31.239
<v Speaker 4>divine nature. It talks about us being like God. We

3396
03:18:31.319 --> 03:18:34.399
<v Speaker 4>will be transformed into His into the likeness of his

3397
03:18:34.559 --> 03:18:35.479
<v Speaker 4>glorious body.

3398
03:18:36.920 --> 03:18:40.959
<v Speaker 3>You know, we will partake of his glory. Paul talks about.

3399
03:18:40.760 --> 03:18:44.079
<v Speaker 4>Dunamus and inner gaya, But I don't know if Tom

3400
03:18:44.120 --> 03:18:46.040
<v Speaker 4>had a p if the I mean, you can just look.

3401
03:18:46.360 --> 03:18:47.840
<v Speaker 4>You could google it really quick and see if the

3402
03:18:47.920 --> 03:18:49.600
<v Speaker 4>New Testament ever uses the word.

3403
03:18:49.639 --> 03:18:51.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it does. Says that it does not, Yeah,

3404
03:18:52.239 --> 03:18:52.719
<v Speaker 3>just checked it.

3405
03:18:53.959 --> 03:18:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm not sure which Greek father would have been

3406
03:18:59.079 --> 03:19:02.840
<v Speaker 4>the first to use it, maybe Theophilis or Athanacious something

3407
03:19:02.920 --> 03:19:06.200
<v Speaker 4>like that. But it just became a term that sort

3408
03:19:06.239 --> 03:19:11.680
<v Speaker 4>of encapsulates the participation in divine life that we undergo.

3409
03:19:13.600 --> 03:19:19.040
<v Speaker 4>And I mean that, you know, you'll find the terminology

3410
03:19:19.079 --> 03:19:22.559
<v Speaker 4>of sanctification use sanctified, made holy set apart.

3411
03:19:23.920 --> 03:19:28.639
<v Speaker 3>In the patriistic writings. But I think probably by the

3412
03:19:30.479 --> 03:19:30.799
<v Speaker 3>by the.

3413
03:19:33.719 --> 03:19:38.760
<v Speaker 4>Controversies relating to first Ephesis and the nature of Christ

3414
03:19:38.840 --> 03:19:43.280
<v Speaker 4>at Ephesus and the Eucharist, because Cyril uses the Euchrist.

3415
03:19:42.959 --> 03:19:45.879
<v Speaker 3>As an argument against Nestorians, and then.

3416
03:19:45.879 --> 03:19:48.959
<v Speaker 4>By the time of the Sixth Council, when Maximus is

3417
03:19:49.040 --> 03:19:53.120
<v Speaker 4>debating about the deification of christ human body, the Sixth

3418
03:19:53.200 --> 03:19:56.959
<v Speaker 4>Council uses that terminology where they say that in the incarnation,

3419
03:19:57.440 --> 03:20:00.079
<v Speaker 4>the human nature of Christ is fully deified. That in

3420
03:20:00.200 --> 03:20:03.440
<v Speaker 4>the six Council, so it becomes kind of concilier dogma

3421
03:20:05.200 --> 03:20:09.920
<v Speaker 4>by that time, although it's pretty pretty normal even prior

3422
03:20:10.000 --> 03:20:10.559
<v Speaker 4>to that time.

3423
03:20:10.840 --> 03:20:13.319
<v Speaker 3>So, but I don't know the I'm not a you know,

3424
03:20:13.319 --> 03:20:14.520
<v Speaker 3>a linguist, so I'm not sure.

3425
03:20:14.639 --> 03:20:18.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I don't know. I mean, apotheosis was used, and

3426
03:20:18.920 --> 03:20:25.879
<v Speaker 8>obviously we distinguish theosis from that. But in Greek antiquity,

3427
03:20:26.319 --> 03:20:32.639
<v Speaker 8>obviously they had a concept becoming divine. It just was

3428
03:20:32.719 --> 03:20:41.040
<v Speaker 8>heretical because they didn't have the energies doctrine, so obviously

3429
03:20:43.239 --> 03:20:48.000
<v Speaker 8>I'm imagining the use of it derives, you know, from

3430
03:20:48.079 --> 03:20:50.840
<v Speaker 8>antiquity and the concept from apathiosis.

3431
03:20:55.760 --> 03:21:00.399
<v Speaker 56>Okay, thank you, And you said apathiosis that word is

3432
03:21:00.680 --> 03:21:02.280
<v Speaker 56>in the Greek New Testament.

3433
03:21:02.799 --> 03:21:03.479
<v Speaker 3>No it's not.

3434
03:21:04.360 --> 03:21:05.719
<v Speaker 56>Okay, I'm misunderstand you.

3435
03:21:05.840 --> 03:21:11.280
<v Speaker 8>Sorry, it's in antiquity. I'm trying to remember how far back,

3436
03:21:12.799 --> 03:21:16.000
<v Speaker 8>if maybe even in Homer.

3437
03:21:16.639 --> 03:21:17.399
<v Speaker 5>I'll have to look.

3438
03:21:19.000 --> 03:21:21.479
<v Speaker 8>But it's not a foreign concept, is what I'm saying.

3439
03:21:21.559 --> 03:21:21.840
<v Speaker 44>And so.

3440
03:21:23.319 --> 03:21:27.360
<v Speaker 8>Just like when Saint Paul on the arapegis speaking to

3441
03:21:27.399 --> 03:21:31.399
<v Speaker 8>the philosophers, uses their language and says, well, you know,

3442
03:21:32.479 --> 03:21:35.479
<v Speaker 8>this is whom your poets even speak of, and whom

3443
03:21:35.520 --> 03:21:38.680
<v Speaker 8>we live and have our being, I imagine the fathers

3444
03:21:39.000 --> 03:21:43.200
<v Speaker 8>use those kinds of concepts, like say Gregory theologian says,

3445
03:21:43.280 --> 03:21:47.200
<v Speaker 8>when speaking to philosophers, speak philosophy, they may win the

3446
03:21:47.239 --> 03:21:50.559
<v Speaker 8>philosopher over. So they probably what I'm saying is the

3447
03:21:50.639 --> 03:21:54.559
<v Speaker 8>concept obviously existed back then, and so they pulled from

3448
03:21:54.639 --> 03:22:01.959
<v Speaker 8>that and showed the Christian version. But like Jay said,

3449
03:22:02.000 --> 03:22:06.520
<v Speaker 8>this is probably not fully articulat until you get kind

3450
03:22:06.559 --> 03:22:08.959
<v Speaker 8>of more of these controversies. When you get to the

3451
03:22:09.440 --> 03:22:14.280
<v Speaker 8>power might sends, and you might have it in Saint Basil.

3452
03:22:14.600 --> 03:22:16.520
<v Speaker 8>I'm gonna have to look, like Jay said, I don't

3453
03:22:16.559 --> 03:22:17.399
<v Speaker 8>know off the top of my head.

3454
03:22:18.840 --> 03:22:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I got you could I ask a follow up question, Yeah, sure,

3455
03:22:24.879 --> 03:22:25.200
<v Speaker 3>what's up?

3456
03:22:27.440 --> 03:22:27.719
<v Speaker 46>Do you.

3457
03:22:29.639 --> 03:22:33.639
<v Speaker 56>Do you feel like the English word sanctification misses some

3458
03:22:34.719 --> 03:22:38.760
<v Speaker 56>meaning or doctrine understanding or anything like that when dealing

3459
03:22:38.840 --> 03:22:41.399
<v Speaker 56>with the Orthodox.

3460
03:22:43.959 --> 03:22:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, the problem really is just that it's kind of

3461
03:22:46.719 --> 03:22:49.159
<v Speaker 3>like the word transferstantiation. When we were discussing that in

3462
03:22:49.280 --> 03:22:51.680
<v Speaker 3>it earlier. You might not have heard that. But it's

3463
03:22:51.719 --> 03:22:53.760
<v Speaker 3>not a problem with the word itself. It's just that,

3464
03:22:54.280 --> 03:22:54.840
<v Speaker 3>like if the.

3465
03:22:56.319 --> 03:22:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Translation of John Demouscus that we use from the Catholics

3466
03:22:59.600 --> 03:23:02.639
<v Speaker 4>uses the word transubstantiation, it's not a problem. It just

3467
03:23:02.719 --> 03:23:08.760
<v Speaker 4>doesn't require us to bring along all the metaphysical baggage

3468
03:23:08.840 --> 03:23:12.479
<v Speaker 4>of the Scholastics and exoperate operato and all that other stuff,

3469
03:23:13.079 --> 03:23:15.079
<v Speaker 4>because the word just means a change of substance, which

3470
03:23:15.159 --> 03:23:19.399
<v Speaker 4>is fine in the same way like sanctification usually has

3471
03:23:19.440 --> 03:23:23.639
<v Speaker 4>this Protestant connotation where Protestants when they hear that word

3472
03:23:24.639 --> 03:23:27.760
<v Speaker 4>just like penal or just like substitution, like they import

3473
03:23:27.879 --> 03:23:30.040
<v Speaker 4>all this theological baggage to it. That they have and

3474
03:23:30.079 --> 03:23:35.079
<v Speaker 4>they hear sanctification, they think, oh, that's the distinguished from

3475
03:23:35.399 --> 03:23:39.079
<v Speaker 4>glorification and distinguished from justification. These are the three stages

3476
03:23:39.120 --> 03:23:41.959
<v Speaker 4>that are clearly distinguished in scripture. When they're not right,

3477
03:23:42.040 --> 03:23:46.840
<v Speaker 4>so Protestants will read into that the Protestant doctrine of sanctification,

3478
03:23:47.040 --> 03:23:51.200
<v Speaker 4>which is strictly distinct from justification and glorification, and that

3479
03:23:51.280 --> 03:23:57.479
<v Speaker 4>would immediately be in contradiction to like Orthodox ideas because Paul,

3480
03:23:57.559 --> 03:24:00.719
<v Speaker 4>for example, says the glorification is something that we can

3481
03:24:00.799 --> 03:24:03.239
<v Speaker 4>have even in this life. When he talks about Second

3482
03:24:03.239 --> 03:24:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Prithian's three that we see Christ face to face now

3483
03:24:06.680 --> 03:24:09.079
<v Speaker 4>and we see that saying glory and we pass from

3484
03:24:09.120 --> 03:24:12.360
<v Speaker 4>glory to glory. Well, I'm sorry, that means that we

3485
03:24:12.479 --> 03:24:16.280
<v Speaker 4>have glorification now and that violates the uh, you know,

3486
03:24:16.600 --> 03:24:21.079
<v Speaker 4>ordo salutis of the Reformation tradition. So the problem is

3487
03:24:21.159 --> 03:24:24.440
<v Speaker 4>not the words. It's just sometimes people bring a lot

3488
03:24:24.520 --> 03:24:27.440
<v Speaker 4>of baggage, and I mean it's kind of inescapable. I

3489
03:24:27.520 --> 03:24:30.479
<v Speaker 4>think everybody kind of brings an interpretation to the text.

3490
03:24:31.079 --> 03:24:34.680
<v Speaker 4>It's inescapable. But it's more so a question of you know,

3491
03:24:34.840 --> 03:24:36.879
<v Speaker 4>to put it in the words of Jordan Peterson. Depends

3492
03:24:36.920 --> 03:24:40.239
<v Speaker 4>on much to me, Right, it's not the word transpnentiation

3493
03:24:40.440 --> 03:24:42.840
<v Speaker 4>or the word sanctification, the word justification.

3494
03:24:43.840 --> 03:24:45.079
<v Speaker 3>It depends on what you mean.

3495
03:24:45.239 --> 03:24:49.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think that there's probably some rhetorical wisdom when

3496
03:24:49.719 --> 03:24:52.799
<v Speaker 8>to use it, because, like you said, a lot of

3497
03:24:52.840 --> 03:24:56.840
<v Speaker 8>these words they're contaminated from other heresies and stuff like that.

3498
03:24:57.399 --> 03:25:02.399
<v Speaker 8>So your audience may think that you're meaning something different

3499
03:25:03.360 --> 03:25:05.719
<v Speaker 8>when you use the word or oh, they're like us,

3500
03:25:05.959 --> 03:25:08.959
<v Speaker 8>they believe Mormons are famous.

3501
03:25:08.719 --> 03:25:09.159
<v Speaker 5>For doing this.

3502
03:25:10.719 --> 03:25:13.360
<v Speaker 8>Oh yeah, oh yeah, yeah, well we believe the same thing.

3503
03:25:13.520 --> 03:25:18.479
<v Speaker 8>I mean, they they know you don't mean the same thing,

3504
03:25:18.559 --> 03:25:20.559
<v Speaker 8>and you know that they don't. And so you're playing

3505
03:25:20.600 --> 03:25:25.840
<v Speaker 8>this stupid game for an hour, like and so sometimes

3506
03:25:25.920 --> 03:25:29.440
<v Speaker 8>you just got to choose, like, Okay, depending on my audience,

3507
03:25:29.520 --> 03:25:31.840
<v Speaker 8>what sort of words would I use? But yeah, the

3508
03:25:31.920 --> 03:25:33.440
<v Speaker 8>word itself is not problematic.

3509
03:25:35.120 --> 03:25:36.040
<v Speaker 56>Okay, thank you guys.

3510
03:25:39.959 --> 03:25:43.280
<v Speaker 64>Hey, Jay, I just wanted to piggyback off of something

3511
03:25:43.319 --> 03:25:45.079
<v Speaker 64>that you said earlier. I'm Orthodox now, but I grew

3512
03:25:45.159 --> 03:25:48.680
<v Speaker 64>up Protestant. And it's interesting when you talked about earlier

3513
03:25:49.040 --> 03:25:52.760
<v Speaker 64>about steelmanning somebody's position, I was immediately reminded of not

3514
03:25:52.879 --> 03:25:55.239
<v Speaker 64>too long ago when all those performed Protestants were coming

3515
03:25:55.280 --> 03:25:58.079
<v Speaker 64>out and they were so adamant that Orthodoxy was wrong.

3516
03:25:58.200 --> 03:26:00.600
<v Speaker 64>But when you saw what they thought, we believe they

3517
03:26:00.600 --> 03:26:04.719
<v Speaker 64>didn't even know the basics of Orthodox theology. And that's

3518
03:26:04.719 --> 03:26:07.319
<v Speaker 64>what I was reminded of today when James White was

3519
03:26:08.159 --> 03:26:10.520
<v Speaker 64>sending his tweets saying that he didn't want to debate

3520
03:26:10.559 --> 03:26:13.000
<v Speaker 64>you r whatever. In some guy in his comments was like, oh,

3521
03:26:13.079 --> 03:26:16.079
<v Speaker 64>Jay didn't show the fruit to the spirit, And I'm like, okay, anyway,

3522
03:26:16.120 --> 03:26:17.959
<v Speaker 64>that I just thought it was really funny, just how

3523
03:26:18.559 --> 03:26:19.239
<v Speaker 64>the irony in that.

3524
03:26:19.399 --> 03:26:22.159
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they'll they'll debate all day about tone policing, they'll

3525
03:26:22.200 --> 03:26:25.079
<v Speaker 4>debate about debating and not actually debate the topics. It's

3526
03:26:25.120 --> 03:26:28.959
<v Speaker 4>really it's kind of just it's like a passive, aggressive, weird, effeminent.

3527
03:26:28.559 --> 03:26:32.680
<v Speaker 64>Thing, right anyway, thanks for bringing me up, Yeah.

3528
03:26:32.600 --> 03:26:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. I agree. I mean it's weird too because

3529
03:26:37.000 --> 03:26:42.239
<v Speaker 3>back in the day, like in the two thousands, like

3530
03:26:42.399 --> 03:26:47.319
<v Speaker 3>Calvinists and Catholics were way more like intellectual about the debates.

3531
03:26:48.200 --> 03:26:50.280
<v Speaker 4>And this is something because I remember, like I was

3532
03:26:50.440 --> 03:26:52.840
<v Speaker 4>in Messing that you know, from two thousand and one

3533
03:26:53.120 --> 03:26:57.319
<v Speaker 4>two three, I was all about internet. Catholic Protestant debates, right,

3534
03:26:57.360 --> 03:26:59.079
<v Speaker 4>because I was Calvinists and I was arguing with the

3535
03:26:59.120 --> 03:26:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Catholics all the time.

3536
03:27:00.079 --> 03:27:00.600
<v Speaker 3>On the internet.

3537
03:27:01.879 --> 03:27:04.440
<v Speaker 4>There wasn't really an Orthodox presence much on the Internet

3538
03:27:04.639 --> 03:27:07.159
<v Speaker 4>in terms of apologetics or websites, so it's kind of

3539
03:27:07.280 --> 03:27:11.920
<v Speaker 4>like just default Protestant versus Catholic. And one thing that's

3540
03:27:11.959 --> 03:27:14.239
<v Speaker 4>interesting is like back when it was the blog wars

3541
03:27:15.120 --> 03:27:20.399
<v Speaker 4>of those two thousands era, you know, exchanges and even Facebook, like,

3542
03:27:20.520 --> 03:27:22.399
<v Speaker 4>it was a lot more you know, because you have

3543
03:27:22.520 --> 03:27:24.520
<v Speaker 4>to write out stuff, So those are a lot more

3544
03:27:24.559 --> 03:27:27.719
<v Speaker 4>I think thought that went into it. And now that

3545
03:27:27.799 --> 03:27:36.639
<v Speaker 4>everything is audio, video and speech oriented, it's less intellectual

3546
03:27:36.719 --> 03:27:41.000
<v Speaker 4>and it's a lot more. I mean, it's not that

3547
03:27:41.280 --> 03:27:45.760
<v Speaker 4>oral debate is inherently deficient or anti intellectual. It's just

3548
03:27:45.879 --> 03:27:49.639
<v Speaker 4>that the loss of the tendency to debate in a

3549
03:27:49.760 --> 03:27:53.600
<v Speaker 4>written form has allowed a lot more goobers and goofballs

3550
03:27:53.680 --> 03:27:58.920
<v Speaker 4>to just you know, whine and fuss and act like idiots.

3551
03:27:59.799 --> 03:28:02.159
<v Speaker 4>And people don't even know how to have like a

3552
03:28:02.280 --> 03:28:06.200
<v Speaker 4>formal debate, so people bitch about me like being quote mean, well,

3553
03:28:06.399 --> 03:28:09.680
<v Speaker 4>if I'm interrupting people on an informal, open debate space,

3554
03:28:09.799 --> 03:28:13.040
<v Speaker 4>that's not a formal debate. If I'm doing a formal debate,

3555
03:28:13.879 --> 03:28:16.040
<v Speaker 4>most of the time, I'm pretty reserved. There's been a

3556
03:28:16.120 --> 03:28:19.639
<v Speaker 4>couple of times, yes, where I will interrupt. I interrupted

3557
03:28:19.719 --> 03:28:22.200
<v Speaker 4>the Muslim Lantern debate because he was being dishonest and

3558
03:28:22.360 --> 03:28:24.879
<v Speaker 4>not representing what I said. He was misp I think,

3559
03:28:24.959 --> 03:28:28.000
<v Speaker 4>intentionally misrepresenting what I said. But I mean, in most

3560
03:28:28.040 --> 03:28:31.399
<v Speaker 4>of the formal debates, I'm pretty much abide by the rules.

3561
03:28:32.200 --> 03:28:34.760
<v Speaker 4>And even if you don't quote abide by the rules, like,

3562
03:28:34.920 --> 03:28:36.360
<v Speaker 4>that's the job of the moderator to.

3563
03:28:36.399 --> 03:28:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Call you out.

3564
03:28:38.079 --> 03:28:39.799
<v Speaker 4>Most people don't know how to moderate a debate, so

3565
03:28:39.879 --> 03:28:42.680
<v Speaker 4>they suck at moderating debates and they don't ever call anybody.

3566
03:28:42.399 --> 03:28:45.159
<v Speaker 3>Out when they violate the rules.

3567
03:28:45.760 --> 03:28:47.520
<v Speaker 4>But even if you violate the rules a little bit

3568
03:28:47.600 --> 03:28:49.360
<v Speaker 4>and interrupt, I mean, it's not the end of the world.

3569
03:28:49.440 --> 03:28:52.040
<v Speaker 4>It's just the moderator calls you out, and you know,

3570
03:28:52.120 --> 03:28:54.840
<v Speaker 4>like muti or whatever. That's the way it ought to operate.

3571
03:28:55.319 --> 03:28:57.639
<v Speaker 4>But on these open spaces here like this, like when

3572
03:28:57.680 --> 03:28:59.639
<v Speaker 4>we had you guys heard the atheist guy in here

3573
03:28:59.760 --> 03:29:06.200
<v Speaker 4>right totally arguing it in bad faith being a sophist, Like, no,

3574
03:29:06.360 --> 03:29:08.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to interrupt that person this is not a

3575
03:29:08.440 --> 03:29:09.040
<v Speaker 4>formal debate.

3576
03:29:09.120 --> 03:29:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't owe anyone a formal debate. I don't owe

3577
03:29:12.079 --> 03:29:13.879
<v Speaker 3>some rando dude a formal debate.

3578
03:29:14.399 --> 03:29:17.639
<v Speaker 4>And again, in the case of James White, I tried

3579
03:29:17.680 --> 03:29:20.680
<v Speaker 4>to debate him for years, and I offered to debate

3580
03:29:20.760 --> 03:29:24.000
<v Speaker 4>him on the trinity and that he had a faulty

3581
03:29:24.079 --> 03:29:28.799
<v Speaker 4>concept of trinity as any indistinction, and he for years said,

3582
03:29:30.600 --> 03:29:33.479
<v Speaker 4>you know, no, I don't have time to learn Orthodoxy.

3583
03:29:33.479 --> 03:29:34.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm not interested in any of that.

3584
03:29:35.600 --> 03:29:38.079
<v Speaker 4>And then here we are, like six years later, and he,

3585
03:29:39.840 --> 03:29:42.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, tweets about how he doesn't understand my profile,

3586
03:29:42.719 --> 03:29:45.639
<v Speaker 4>which is super boomer, which is funny, and then he says,

3587
03:29:46.600 --> 03:29:51.120
<v Speaker 4>I want a debate when I drive my RV in

3588
03:29:51.239 --> 03:29:56.799
<v Speaker 4>a year. I mean, to me, it just sous like

3589
03:29:56.879 --> 03:29:58.000
<v Speaker 4>It's like, I'm kind.

3590
03:29:57.840 --> 03:30:01.479
<v Speaker 3>Of surprised that he sounds like a comedian.

3591
03:30:01.559 --> 03:30:03.799
<v Speaker 4>And he was saying, I'm I'm a comedian, but he

3592
03:30:03.840 --> 03:30:07.680
<v Speaker 4>doesn't think I'm a comedian, but he's actually an unintentional

3593
03:30:07.760 --> 03:30:10.799
<v Speaker 4>comedian because it just sounds like this just sounds like

3594
03:30:10.840 --> 03:30:11.319
<v Speaker 4>a bunch.

3595
03:30:11.159 --> 03:30:13.399
<v Speaker 3>Of like made up clown stuff. It's just weird.

3596
03:30:14.360 --> 03:30:14.479
<v Speaker 17>Uh.

3597
03:30:14.799 --> 03:30:16.840
<v Speaker 4>And then he said, why would I debate a person

3598
03:30:16.879 --> 03:30:19.559
<v Speaker 4>who has a green picture on their profile of themselves?

3599
03:30:20.280 --> 03:30:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Is he a green person? That was his retort.

3600
03:30:23.440 --> 03:30:29.360
<v Speaker 8>Like, what, by the way, I just following up you

3601
03:30:29.520 --> 03:30:35.200
<v Speaker 8>said back in the day, like you said, debating online

3602
03:30:35.600 --> 03:30:38.600
<v Speaker 8>wasn't really a big thing. There weren't that many people

3603
03:30:39.520 --> 03:30:40.920
<v Speaker 8>there went a bunch of goobers.

3604
03:30:41.280 --> 03:30:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

3605
03:30:41.559 --> 03:30:47.799
<v Speaker 8>Right, This is probably prior to even like Facebook. You

3606
03:30:47.840 --> 03:30:51.440
<v Speaker 8>didn't have Twitter acts and all this stuff, and so

3607
03:30:52.440 --> 03:30:54.159
<v Speaker 8>you could kind of people knew what they were doing.

3608
03:30:54.239 --> 03:30:55.799
<v Speaker 8>For the most part, you can kind of get it,

3609
03:30:55.840 --> 03:31:00.360
<v Speaker 8>and there was kind of reputation within those circles. Now

3610
03:31:00.520 --> 03:31:06.360
<v Speaker 8>everybody and their moms online can just challenge you, know you,

3611
03:31:06.639 --> 03:31:10.600
<v Speaker 8>and so it's a matter of like wasting time, Like

3612
03:31:11.000 --> 03:31:14.120
<v Speaker 8>sure the person might be right, but there's a million

3613
03:31:14.239 --> 03:31:19.280
<v Speaker 8>people all challenge you. There's no way that you're going

3614
03:31:19.360 --> 03:31:24.200
<v Speaker 8>to waste your time writing out a formal debate and

3615
03:31:24.280 --> 03:31:28.360
<v Speaker 8>written format for every single person who's challenging you. So

3616
03:31:28.479 --> 03:31:32.799
<v Speaker 8>the best thing is to it's a different Yeah, the

3617
03:31:32.920 --> 03:31:36.719
<v Speaker 8>best thing is just to open up a space where

3618
03:31:36.719 --> 03:31:39.559
<v Speaker 8>there's a dedicated time. And I think that's even better

3619
03:31:39.600 --> 03:31:44.479
<v Speaker 8>if people got you know, get upset when they get

3620
03:31:44.520 --> 03:31:49.040
<v Speaker 8>the block on X. But the fact of The matter is,

3621
03:31:49.200 --> 03:31:52.319
<v Speaker 8>if you don't block people, these stupid arguments will go

3622
03:31:52.479 --> 03:31:55.280
<v Speaker 8>on forever endeavor you can't get on with your life.

3623
03:31:55.319 --> 03:31:58.520
<v Speaker 8>So isn't it better just to say whatever your criticism is,

3624
03:31:58.600 --> 03:32:01.639
<v Speaker 8>whatever your argument, Well, here's a space dedicated you can

3625
03:32:01.719 --> 03:32:04.959
<v Speaker 8>come on and make your argument, but you're not owed anything.

3626
03:32:05.040 --> 03:32:08.159
<v Speaker 8>You're not owed and on not to be blocked and

3627
03:32:08.280 --> 03:32:12.120
<v Speaker 8>an endless back and forth of stupid tweets.

3628
03:32:17.600 --> 03:32:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, the positives of debate are oral.

3629
03:32:21.280 --> 03:32:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Debate is that people don't get the trick of relying

3630
03:32:24.959 --> 03:32:28.360
<v Speaker 4>on AI, which is what a lot of them want

3631
03:32:28.399 --> 03:32:31.200
<v Speaker 4>to do when they say I only do written debates, Well,

3632
03:32:31.319 --> 03:32:33.239
<v Speaker 4>you didn't have AI back in two thousand and five

3633
03:32:33.280 --> 03:32:36.799
<v Speaker 4>when you were doing written blog debates and now you do.

3634
03:32:37.479 --> 03:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>So No, it's not going to work to let you

3635
03:32:40.920 --> 03:32:43.760
<v Speaker 4>just like sit there and type out and who has

3636
03:32:43.799 --> 03:32:44.520
<v Speaker 4>the time to do this.

3637
03:32:46.120 --> 03:32:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Anyway.

3638
03:32:46.600 --> 03:32:50.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to type out twenty pages argument with

3639
03:32:50.360 --> 03:32:53.200
<v Speaker 4>some random dude. That's what was going on today. There

3640
03:32:53.239 --> 03:32:55.360
<v Speaker 4>was a Calvinist guy saying I will only debate you

3641
03:32:55.440 --> 03:32:57.520
<v Speaker 4>in a written blog format. I'm like, dude, it's not

3642
03:32:57.600 --> 03:32:59.319
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and three, man, what are you talking about.

3643
03:33:00.680 --> 03:33:02.680
<v Speaker 8>The other thing you figured out there was another group

3644
03:33:02.719 --> 03:33:05.559
<v Speaker 8>of people that were challenging tag the kind of the

3645
03:33:05.639 --> 03:33:11.760
<v Speaker 8>pseudo intellectuals. Most of them would never come into a

3646
03:33:12.760 --> 03:33:17.040
<v Speaker 8>voice chat debate, and what we figured out is basically

3647
03:33:17.120 --> 03:33:19.159
<v Speaker 8>what they were doing is they were taking these into

3648
03:33:19.239 --> 03:33:21.360
<v Speaker 8>other servers and working them out and taking them to

3649
03:33:21.399 --> 03:33:22.440
<v Speaker 8>philosophy professors.

3650
03:33:22.799 --> 03:33:28.799
<v Speaker 3>Yea like Appy and Right, So you're not actually debating

3651
03:33:28.840 --> 03:33:32.200
<v Speaker 3>that guy. You're debating like a buddy, You're a debating.

3652
03:33:33.600 --> 03:33:39.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, grad students And two of the best atheist philosophers

3653
03:33:39.319 --> 03:33:42.239
<v Speaker 8>are Appy and what's the other guy with my blanking on.

3654
03:33:44.200 --> 03:33:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Oz and Ozzy.

3655
03:33:48.239 --> 03:33:51.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's the guy that coaches Della Hunty when Della

3656
03:33:51.559 --> 03:33:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Hunty gets scared.

3657
03:33:53.399 --> 03:33:56.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So they just take it and they work these things.

3658
03:33:56.239 --> 03:33:58.879
<v Speaker 8>So it's like, well, just no, I'm not going to

3659
03:33:58.920 --> 03:34:01.760
<v Speaker 8>waste my time going back and forth and text with

3660
03:34:02.280 --> 03:34:03.280
<v Speaker 8>a whole crew of.

3661
03:34:05.840 --> 03:34:08.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're supposed to debate like, uh, you know, a

3662
03:34:08.840 --> 03:34:10.760
<v Speaker 4>discord of fifty atheists.

3663
03:34:10.319 --> 03:34:14.799
<v Speaker 3>Or you're scared? Right, ultravol kool Aid?

3664
03:34:14.840 --> 03:34:19.200
<v Speaker 41>What's up, hey, Jerry Camyred.

3665
03:34:19.559 --> 03:34:24.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I'm actually local in Phoenix and I used

3666
03:34:24.680 --> 03:34:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to go to Apologia Studios and I've studied under James

3667
03:34:30.159 --> 03:34:33.280
<v Speaker 2>White for a while before I started learning about Orthodoxy,

3668
03:34:33.840 --> 03:34:37.360
<v Speaker 2>and I just wanted to say that when he promised it, saying.

3669
03:34:37.200 --> 03:34:38.280
<v Speaker 38>Like, oh is this him?

3670
03:34:38.479 --> 03:34:39.000
<v Speaker 30>I don't know.

3671
03:34:39.440 --> 03:34:42.879
<v Speaker 2>He knows full well who you are. He made responses,

3672
03:34:43.000 --> 03:34:45.239
<v Speaker 2>he's talked about it. Yeah, he's talked about you, So

3673
03:34:45.280 --> 03:34:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how he was trying to start that with.

3674
03:34:47.200 --> 03:34:48.520
<v Speaker 8>Like, Oh, who's this guy.

3675
03:34:49.040 --> 03:34:52.440
<v Speaker 2>He's made claims about you before and he knows farewell

3676
03:34:52.479 --> 03:34:54.399
<v Speaker 2>who you were, so like, I think it was just

3677
03:34:54.479 --> 03:34:57.280
<v Speaker 2>dishonest how he started the interaction trying to claim like, oh,

3678
03:34:57.440 --> 03:34:59.239
<v Speaker 2>is this the guy people who have been talking about.

3679
03:35:00.959 --> 03:35:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he was being silly, so I agree. But yeah, again,

3680
03:35:08.840 --> 03:35:09.239
<v Speaker 3>let's like.

3681
03:35:11.840 --> 03:35:13.920
<v Speaker 4>It's the same kind of thing that William Aulbrick would do,

3682
03:35:13.959 --> 03:35:15.559
<v Speaker 4>where it'd be like you'd be trying to set up

3683
03:35:15.559 --> 03:35:18.319
<v Speaker 4>a debate for years and he would say, Okay, in

3684
03:35:18.440 --> 03:35:21.719
<v Speaker 4>six months it'll be live. And then it's like he's

3685
03:35:21.799 --> 03:35:24.959
<v Speaker 4>expecting you to set up a live venue and you're like, well, now,

3686
03:35:25.040 --> 03:35:26.200
<v Speaker 4>let's just do it on the internet.

3687
03:35:26.319 --> 03:35:29.319
<v Speaker 3>I don't do that. I do it live. Do it

3688
03:35:29.479 --> 03:35:31.319
<v Speaker 3>live right, like O'Reilly or something.

3689
03:35:31.399 --> 03:35:36.000
<v Speaker 4>It's like everybody in the world nowadays does internet debates.

3690
03:35:36.479 --> 03:35:38.760
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean setting it up in person in

3691
03:35:38.879 --> 03:35:42.680
<v Speaker 4>six months and then six months goes by and it's like, oh, yeah,

3692
03:35:43.920 --> 03:35:46.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot going on, let's do it live in another

3693
03:35:46.959 --> 03:35:50.440
<v Speaker 4>six months. It's just so stupid. It's like you could

3694
03:35:50.520 --> 03:35:53.079
<v Speaker 4>literally hop on this stream. And by the way, haven't

3695
03:35:53.079 --> 03:35:55.440
<v Speaker 4>you been told defending Calvinism for thirty years? Why do

3696
03:35:55.479 --> 03:35:58.600
<v Speaker 4>you need a year of preparation to debate and defend

3697
03:35:58.680 --> 03:36:01.520
<v Speaker 4>your Calvinist stuff. You've been debating for like thirty your

3698
03:36:01.559 --> 03:36:02.079
<v Speaker 4>whole life.

3699
03:36:02.959 --> 03:36:15.239
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's just stupid. Eli, I went's up by

3700
03:36:15.319 --> 03:36:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the way.

3701
03:36:15.840 --> 03:36:19.600
<v Speaker 4>By the way, I don't know if maybe Wes Wes

3702
03:36:19.719 --> 03:36:22.200
<v Speaker 4>Hoff might be more popular than James White now right.

3703
03:36:22.360 --> 03:36:24.760
<v Speaker 4>So it's like we're already trying to set up a

3704
03:36:24.799 --> 03:36:28.520
<v Speaker 4>debate on tim cast with me versus I don't I

3705
03:36:28.559 --> 03:36:30.920
<v Speaker 4>don't know if I'll have a companion or not, but

3706
03:36:31.079 --> 03:36:35.120
<v Speaker 4>me versus. It was supposed to be Michael Knowles originally

3707
03:36:35.200 --> 03:36:39.360
<v Speaker 4>and Tim Poole, and then I don't think Michael Knowles

3708
03:36:39.360 --> 03:36:40.479
<v Speaker 4>will do it, so I was like, well, you better

3709
03:36:40.479 --> 03:36:43.760
<v Speaker 4>get Tim Gordon because Michael Knowles will rely on Tim Gordon.

3710
03:36:44.600 --> 03:36:46.639
<v Speaker 3>And then they were like, oh, we need Protestants too,

3711
03:36:46.799 --> 03:36:49.200
<v Speaker 3>and so I can't stand.

3712
03:36:49.440 --> 03:36:51.879
<v Speaker 4>I don't know who's I guess James White's worse than

3713
03:36:51.959 --> 03:36:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Doug Wilson. So I have less distaste for Doug Wilson

3714
03:36:56.079 --> 03:36:59.959
<v Speaker 4>than James White. But I mean, isn't Wes Huff kind

3715
03:36:59.959 --> 03:37:03.000
<v Speaker 4>of the hot topic right now? So what did he

3716
03:37:03.079 --> 03:37:06.840
<v Speaker 4>be better than all these boom Boomer gen z old

3717
03:37:06.920 --> 03:37:08.600
<v Speaker 4>fogies that nobody really cares about.

3718
03:37:08.959 --> 03:37:10.479
<v Speaker 3>So I'd prefer it be like west Off.

3719
03:37:10.559 --> 03:37:11.079
<v Speaker 6>But I don't know.

3720
03:37:14.639 --> 03:37:14.680
<v Speaker 5>You.

3721
03:37:16.479 --> 03:37:19.719
<v Speaker 65>Oh hey, Jay, I had a quick question on the

3722
03:37:19.799 --> 03:37:23.120
<v Speaker 65>topic of confession. I don't know if you don't want

3723
03:37:23.120 --> 03:37:24.559
<v Speaker 65>to answer that or well.

3724
03:37:24.520 --> 03:37:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Father Diacon probably be able to better answer that than me.

3725
03:37:27.399 --> 03:37:28.440
<v Speaker 9>Okay, perfect, perfect.

3726
03:37:29.159 --> 03:37:31.559
<v Speaker 65>Uh So the reason why I'm asking is because I

3727
03:37:31.760 --> 03:37:35.280
<v Speaker 65>was talking to a Protestant family member of mine and

3728
03:37:35.520 --> 03:37:39.680
<v Speaker 65>we were talking about confession, and she was saying, why

3729
03:37:39.799 --> 03:37:44.239
<v Speaker 65>would why would she go confess to a priest when

3730
03:37:44.399 --> 03:37:47.440
<v Speaker 65>she can just guess confess it between her and God?

3731
03:37:47.600 --> 03:37:51.959
<v Speaker 65>Because if the idea and I'm not fully well versed

3732
03:37:52.000 --> 03:37:56.680
<v Speaker 65>on confession yet, but basically saying, wouldn't you be constricting

3733
03:37:56.760 --> 03:37:58.920
<v Speaker 65>God's power of forgiveness if you have to go to

3734
03:37:59.040 --> 03:38:02.600
<v Speaker 65>a priest? Chester forgiveness for even like the smallest things,

3735
03:38:03.239 --> 03:38:05.120
<v Speaker 65>or like what would be considered a small sin.

3736
03:38:05.399 --> 03:38:11.159
<v Speaker 6>I guess in her words, well, I think that in.

3737
03:38:11.200 --> 03:38:13.520
<v Speaker 4>The Old Testament it was already kind of an element

3738
03:38:13.600 --> 03:38:17.000
<v Speaker 4>of this, because you brought your sacrifice to the temple

3739
03:38:17.200 --> 03:38:21.200
<v Speaker 4>based on in many cases the type of sin that

3740
03:38:21.280 --> 03:38:22.000
<v Speaker 4>you had committed.

3741
03:38:22.559 --> 03:38:24.920
<v Speaker 3>So that was kind of an implicit confession. And then

3742
03:38:25.000 --> 03:38:26.440
<v Speaker 3>sometimes we see this.

3743
03:38:26.760 --> 03:38:28.760
<v Speaker 4>We even see the tradition with John the Baptists, where

3744
03:38:28.799 --> 03:38:31.479
<v Speaker 4>it says that they came to him repenting and confessing

3745
03:38:31.520 --> 03:38:33.639
<v Speaker 4>their sins and being baptized.

3746
03:38:34.479 --> 03:38:36.280
<v Speaker 3>So even with John the Baptist, that occurs.

3747
03:38:36.399 --> 03:38:39.159
<v Speaker 4>Jesus says in the Gospel John that he breathes on

3748
03:38:39.239 --> 03:38:41.920
<v Speaker 4>the disciples, and he says, whoever sins you, they're remitted.

3749
03:38:41.959 --> 03:38:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Whoever sins you retained, they're retained. And so we think

3750
03:38:44.799 --> 03:38:48.000
<v Speaker 4>that there really is this principle of the notion of

3751
03:38:48.040 --> 03:38:50.639
<v Speaker 4>the Body of Christ having the ability through the ministers

3752
03:38:50.719 --> 03:38:53.600
<v Speaker 4>to actually remit and retain sins. So there's a real

3753
03:38:53.719 --> 03:38:57.799
<v Speaker 4>power that's there that you know, is not in the

3754
03:38:57.879 --> 03:38:58.719
<v Speaker 4>Protestant world.

3755
03:38:58.920 --> 03:39:01.120
<v Speaker 3>But it's not a bad thing. It's actually a good thing.

3756
03:39:01.719 --> 03:39:05.360
<v Speaker 4>And because we're bodily creatures who are not just you know,

3757
03:39:05.600 --> 03:39:09.600
<v Speaker 4>minds floating around or ghosts floating around. We have a body,

3758
03:39:09.799 --> 03:39:13.159
<v Speaker 4>and our body then interacts with another body, which here's

3759
03:39:13.239 --> 03:39:16.719
<v Speaker 4>our confession, and which then pronounces, you know, absolution. So

3760
03:39:17.399 --> 03:39:20.879
<v Speaker 4>that bodily aspect to absolution I think is a mercy

3761
03:39:21.000 --> 03:39:25.520
<v Speaker 4>from God that allows us to actually feel and sense

3762
03:39:25.760 --> 03:39:28.920
<v Speaker 4>that we have been forgiven, beyond just praying to God,

3763
03:39:29.000 --> 03:39:32.040
<v Speaker 4>which of course you can do, but I think it's

3764
03:39:32.079 --> 03:39:35.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot it's better if we understand and see oral

3765
03:39:35.479 --> 03:39:38.120
<v Speaker 4>confession as a gift rather than some sort of punishment.

3766
03:39:38.239 --> 03:39:42.440
<v Speaker 3>It's it's better understood in my view. Oh okay, that

3767
03:39:42.520 --> 03:39:43.319
<v Speaker 3>makes sense.

3768
03:39:43.399 --> 03:39:47.520
<v Speaker 65>So I guess from what I understand is while technically

3769
03:39:47.600 --> 03:39:49.959
<v Speaker 65>you could still be forgiven of your sense if you

3770
03:39:50.040 --> 03:39:53.360
<v Speaker 65>were to confess it to God, it would be best

3771
03:39:53.760 --> 03:39:54.840
<v Speaker 65>to document.

3772
03:39:54.520 --> 03:39:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Of confession helps us have an assurance of forgiveness, and

3773
03:39:58.799 --> 03:40:02.479
<v Speaker 3>that's the positive part of it. So that's a good

3774
03:40:02.520 --> 03:40:04.959
<v Speaker 3>thing in my view, I mean especially.

3775
03:40:04.760 --> 03:40:11.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so Christ establishes the way to confess, the way

3776
03:40:11.600 --> 03:40:16.440
<v Speaker 8>to pray, a lot of these different things, and you

3777
03:40:16.520 --> 03:40:20.280
<v Speaker 8>can always say, like, well, couldn't we do it? Apart

3778
03:40:20.360 --> 03:40:26.360
<v Speaker 8>from that, Yeah, but he didn't prescribe. He didn't prescribe that. Now,

3779
03:40:26.440 --> 03:40:29.600
<v Speaker 8>of course we do in our prayers we confess to God.

3780
03:40:31.079 --> 03:40:35.799
<v Speaker 8>But we're told it's a both and that. But you

3781
03:40:35.959 --> 03:40:39.360
<v Speaker 8>need to to pray this way, you need to confess

3782
03:40:39.440 --> 03:40:43.319
<v Speaker 8>this way. You need to do these things. And like

3783
03:40:43.520 --> 03:40:50.680
<v Speaker 8>Jay said, it has both spiritual and practical benefits. As

3784
03:40:50.719 --> 03:40:55.239
<v Speaker 8>a Protestant, when I confessed just to God, I didn't

3785
03:40:55.280 --> 03:40:59.079
<v Speaker 8>get better. I still did the same sense.

3786
03:41:01.120 --> 03:41:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Because I wasn't.

3787
03:41:01.719 --> 03:41:05.280
<v Speaker 8>Accountable to anybody. And so we learn accountability to God.

3788
03:41:05.959 --> 03:41:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a good point.

3789
03:41:07.280 --> 03:41:10.559
<v Speaker 8>By making ourselves accountable to other people. The way that

3790
03:41:10.639 --> 03:41:17.079
<v Speaker 8>we practice obedience to God is obedience to our hierarchs

3791
03:41:17.200 --> 03:41:19.799
<v Speaker 8>and our elders and stuff like that. In this case,

3792
03:41:19.920 --> 03:41:20.479
<v Speaker 8>the priests.

3793
03:41:21.120 --> 03:41:22.000
<v Speaker 3>The way that we.

3794
03:41:25.319 --> 03:41:29.799
<v Speaker 8>Practice all these things is here and now, so God

3795
03:41:29.959 --> 03:41:32.840
<v Speaker 8>knows that this works. And the other way if it

3796
03:41:32.959 --> 03:41:35.920
<v Speaker 8>was just well, I can just go straight to God.

3797
03:41:38.600 --> 03:41:43.879
<v Speaker 8>It doesn't do anything practically and psychologically, one typically continues

3798
03:41:44.280 --> 03:41:48.239
<v Speaker 8>in their sin. But and also to have like a

3799
03:41:48.360 --> 03:41:54.799
<v Speaker 8>real relationship with a priest who's counseling you, well, why

3800
03:41:54.799 --> 03:41:58.159
<v Speaker 8>do you think that you did this? Let's talk about

3801
03:41:58.200 --> 03:42:02.280
<v Speaker 8>this and let's go forward on how to make you better.

3802
03:42:03.319 --> 03:42:04.600
<v Speaker 8>You don't get that in Protestantism.

3803
03:42:05.520 --> 03:42:05.920
<v Speaker 43>Mm hmm.

3804
03:42:06.959 --> 03:42:12.159
<v Speaker 8>And also it follows on the scriptural thing having a witness,

3805
03:42:13.559 --> 03:42:16.600
<v Speaker 8>like you're required to have a witness in these things

3806
03:42:16.680 --> 03:42:19.559
<v Speaker 8>like where's your witness? And oh, I confess to God?

3807
03:42:21.760 --> 03:42:25.479
<v Speaker 8>So the priest acts as a witness. You're confessing to

3808
03:42:25.559 --> 03:42:28.479
<v Speaker 8>God in the confession, and the priest is the witness

3809
03:42:28.600 --> 03:42:31.799
<v Speaker 8>to that and has given the power to then as

3810
03:42:31.879 --> 03:42:38.479
<v Speaker 8>being the witness also to announce the absolution or retaining

3811
03:42:38.799 --> 03:42:39.239
<v Speaker 8>the sins.

3812
03:42:43.120 --> 03:43:01.000
<v Speaker 3>What's up? Are you there? We can't hear you, dude,

3813
03:43:01.159 --> 03:43:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Are you there? I don't know. Your microphone doesn't work.

3814
03:43:08.239 --> 03:43:13.959
<v Speaker 3>Then sounds like static, So it's open for him. We're

3815
03:43:14.000 --> 03:43:16.559
<v Speaker 3>still here. I've still got a little more energy. If

3816
03:43:16.600 --> 03:43:19.399
<v Speaker 3>anybody wants to hop up on the panel.

3817
03:43:20.639 --> 03:43:25.799
<v Speaker 4>Topics, So are Calvinism, Protestantism, Catholicism, islam, atheism. If you

3818
03:43:25.840 --> 03:43:28.479
<v Speaker 4>would like to discuss, if you would like to debate,

3819
03:43:28.600 --> 03:43:41.319
<v Speaker 4>if you would like to offer an argument, Alexander, go ahead, yes.

3820
03:43:41.200 --> 03:43:42.719
<v Speaker 3>Sir, all right? Cool.

3821
03:43:42.920 --> 03:43:45.799
<v Speaker 54>I had a question when talking to Calvinists and they

3822
03:43:45.840 --> 03:43:48.559
<v Speaker 54>start playing the that's not what we actually believe game.

3823
03:43:49.280 --> 03:43:50.319
<v Speaker 3>What do you go to look at?

3824
03:43:51.040 --> 03:43:53.719
<v Speaker 54>Because a couple of times I've talked some and they've said, oh,

3825
03:43:53.760 --> 03:43:55.879
<v Speaker 54>that's not what we actually believe, that's not what Calvin Todd,

3826
03:43:55.879 --> 03:43:57.319
<v Speaker 54>and I look it up and that is what Calvin

3827
03:43:57.360 --> 03:44:00.840
<v Speaker 54>Todd kind of like how I went and sat down

3828
03:44:00.920 --> 03:44:03.159
<v Speaker 54>and read all the Vatican two after getting tired of

3829
03:44:03.559 --> 03:44:04.680
<v Speaker 54>Catholics doing the same thing.

3830
03:44:04.799 --> 03:44:05.479
<v Speaker 3>What do you recommend?

3831
03:44:06.520 --> 03:44:09.280
<v Speaker 54>What do you recommend reading as far as refuting Calvinists

3832
03:44:09.280 --> 03:44:10.040
<v Speaker 54>when they start doing that.

3833
03:44:12.600 --> 03:44:18.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, I mean, well there's there's different, you know,

3834
03:44:19.360 --> 03:44:21.719
<v Speaker 3>groups of Calvinists, so they're all going to kind of

3835
03:44:21.760 --> 03:44:24.559
<v Speaker 3>have their pay their favorite sort of peteologians. I mean,

3836
03:44:25.319 --> 03:44:28.120
<v Speaker 3>you can't go wrong in Calvinism with the fifteen to

3837
03:44:28.120 --> 03:44:34.440
<v Speaker 3>fifty nine institutes, the Westminster Confession, Charles Hodge, John Murray,

3838
03:44:36.239 --> 03:44:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, those are all kind of the you know Luminaries,

3839
03:44:39.200 --> 03:44:43.319
<v Speaker 3>Francis Puritan. I mean, those are all pretty well known

3840
03:44:43.479 --> 03:44:49.959
<v Speaker 3>representatives of Calvinism. Okay, you know, put that on the

3841
03:44:50.000 --> 03:44:57.159
<v Speaker 3>reading list. There's also Bavving systematic theology as a classic.

3842
03:44:59.280 --> 03:45:02.120
<v Speaker 54>Okay, yeah, I'll get around to it eventually, but mostly

3843
03:45:02.200 --> 03:45:04.319
<v Speaker 54>I'm just going to try not to talk to Calvinists.

3844
03:45:05.200 --> 03:45:08.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, i mean, the Westminster Confession itself, might be the most,

3845
03:45:08.879 --> 03:45:10.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, because it's intended to kind of be their

3846
03:45:11.920 --> 03:45:13.200
<v Speaker 4>confession of faith and.

3847
03:45:15.000 --> 03:45:17.479
<v Speaker 3>It's not that long. It's just like, I don't know,

3848
03:45:17.600 --> 03:45:20.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine or thirty paragraphs. But it does have a

3849
03:45:20.479 --> 03:45:23.319
<v Speaker 3>catechism with it, so you could have the Westminster Confession

3850
03:45:23.399 --> 03:45:28.399
<v Speaker 3>or the Westminster Catechism would be the classical Calvinist confession.

3851
03:45:28.799 --> 03:45:37.479
<v Speaker 3>What's up, job, Yes, sir, Yeah.

3852
03:45:37.479 --> 03:45:40.360
<v Speaker 4>When I was a Calvinist, we used the Westminster Confession

3853
03:45:40.399 --> 03:45:42.360
<v Speaker 4>and Catechism all the time. That was kind of our

3854
03:45:43.280 --> 03:45:46.120
<v Speaker 4>If people converted that they would use that as catechism.

3855
03:45:53.360 --> 03:45:54.159
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, man, what's up?

3856
03:45:55.959 --> 03:46:00.479
<v Speaker 26>I wanted to ask a question about vicious circularity and

3857
03:46:00.719 --> 03:46:04.799
<v Speaker 26>how if you or Father Deacon could help define it

3858
03:46:04.920 --> 03:46:05.200
<v Speaker 26>for me.

3859
03:46:07.000 --> 03:46:07.920
<v Speaker 3>He's probably the best for this.

3860
03:46:10.399 --> 03:46:16.159
<v Speaker 26>So I've heard like vicious circularity as opposed to or

3861
03:46:16.200 --> 03:46:21.040
<v Speaker 26>being virtuously circular as opposed to vicious circularity, and I've

3862
03:46:21.079 --> 03:46:23.559
<v Speaker 26>been trying to like study this just to give like

3863
03:46:23.600 --> 03:46:24.760
<v Speaker 26>a clear definition on it.

3864
03:46:26.120 --> 03:46:29.000
<v Speaker 3>So he.

3865
03:46:30.920 --> 03:46:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Argues that circularity is just a loaded term, and that's confusing.

3866
03:46:35.040 --> 03:46:39.280
<v Speaker 4>So he argues that at a paradigm level, at the

3867
03:46:39.360 --> 03:46:44.879
<v Speaker 4>base level, worldviews are self referencing, are recursive, and that

3868
03:46:45.040 --> 03:46:49.000
<v Speaker 4>that might help avoid the confusion over the fallacy of

3869
03:46:49.159 --> 03:46:50.079
<v Speaker 4>circular reasonings.

3870
03:46:50.319 --> 03:46:53.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that's exactly right.

3871
03:46:56.799 --> 03:47:03.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, obviously, so it's typically vicious circularity. And I don't

3872
03:47:03.399 --> 03:47:12.360
<v Speaker 8>even use virtuous circularity because it's confusing, so but yeah,

3873
03:47:12.760 --> 03:47:26.319
<v Speaker 8>typically vicious circularity is where the the argument's conclusion is

3874
03:47:26.399 --> 03:47:31.479
<v Speaker 8>basically one of the premises. So what supports the conclusion

3875
03:47:32.319 --> 03:47:37.239
<v Speaker 8>the premises. The premises support the conclusion. And this can

3876
03:47:37.319 --> 03:47:39.440
<v Speaker 8>be done in a different way where you slightly reword it,

3877
03:47:40.239 --> 03:47:44.159
<v Speaker 8>or you go through a chain of reasoning that goes back, well,

3878
03:47:44.200 --> 03:47:46.319
<v Speaker 8>this is true. If this is true, this is true,

3879
03:47:47.239 --> 03:47:52.200
<v Speaker 8>which goes back to the first stuff like that is

3880
03:47:54.920 --> 03:48:03.000
<v Speaker 8>is typically what's considered premise circularity or vicious circularity. But

3881
03:48:03.120 --> 03:48:07.959
<v Speaker 8>obviously not all circularity is bad. I mean, if you

3882
03:48:08.079 --> 03:48:10.680
<v Speaker 8>draw a circle on a paper, it's is that a fallacy,

3883
03:48:14.600 --> 03:48:15.440
<v Speaker 8>right right?

3884
03:48:15.600 --> 03:48:20.079
<v Speaker 26>I heard an atheist talk about tag like, oh, this

3885
03:48:20.200 --> 03:48:24.799
<v Speaker 26>is viciously circular because premise one God's the necessary condition

3886
03:48:24.920 --> 03:48:28.719
<v Speaker 26>for knowledge is basically just being restated and the conclusion

3887
03:48:28.920 --> 03:48:34.280
<v Speaker 26>therefore God exists. And my understanding is that, no, that's

3888
03:48:34.360 --> 03:48:37.879
<v Speaker 26>not viciously circular because premise one is in fact not

3889
03:48:38.000 --> 03:48:42.879
<v Speaker 26>identical to the conclusion, right, and so vicious circularity would

3890
03:48:42.920 --> 03:48:46.840
<v Speaker 26>it be that it would be viciously circular if God

3891
03:48:46.920 --> 03:48:50.280
<v Speaker 26>is the necessary condition for knowledge, we have knowledge. Therefore

3892
03:48:50.319 --> 03:48:52.040
<v Speaker 26>God is the necessary condition for knowledge.

3893
03:48:52.360 --> 03:48:55.319
<v Speaker 8>And that's not the only art. I mean, I could

3894
03:48:55.360 --> 03:48:57.799
<v Speaker 8>just plug whatever I want it in and it's like, well,

3895
03:48:57.840 --> 03:49:02.799
<v Speaker 8>it makes it true. God's true because I assume He

3896
03:49:02.920 --> 03:49:07.159
<v Speaker 8>must be the necessary conditions. If it was simply that,

3897
03:49:07.479 --> 03:49:14.639
<v Speaker 8>obviously that is vicious circularity. But the support for that

3898
03:49:15.600 --> 03:49:23.680
<v Speaker 8>is twofold one is impossibility of the contrary and number

3899
03:49:23.719 --> 03:49:28.760
<v Speaker 8>two which is the indirect account, and number two is

3900
03:49:30.120 --> 03:49:34.799
<v Speaker 8>the positive account that for the entire paradigm. So it's

3901
03:49:34.879 --> 03:49:38.639
<v Speaker 8>not simply we're playing in a word, we mean something

3902
03:49:38.719 --> 03:49:43.319
<v Speaker 8>very specific by the term God, which includes the conception

3903
03:49:43.440 --> 03:49:46.120
<v Speaker 8>of the Trinity, is articulated in the Orthodox Faith, and

3904
03:49:46.239 --> 03:49:51.200
<v Speaker 8>so it's God's revelation to mankind is preserved in the

3905
03:49:51.319 --> 03:49:56.319
<v Speaker 8>Orthodox Faith, and that the Orthodox Faith provides all the

3906
03:49:56.360 --> 03:50:03.520
<v Speaker 8>sufficient conditions for the necessary conditions for the possibility of knowledge,

3907
03:50:03.600 --> 03:50:06.360
<v Speaker 8>and nothing else does that. So I mean, if it

3908
03:50:06.479 --> 03:50:11.200
<v Speaker 8>was just while I plug the terman and therefore I

3909
03:50:11.280 --> 03:50:15.120
<v Speaker 8>assume God to prove God, I mean, yeah, that's vicious circular.

3910
03:50:15.239 --> 03:50:18.120
<v Speaker 8>So there's straw man in the arguments, but that's not

3911
03:50:18.239 --> 03:50:25.799
<v Speaker 8>the argument, right. I mean there's a series of kind

3912
03:50:25.840 --> 03:50:28.879
<v Speaker 8>of different arguments that even when I put it in

3913
03:50:28.920 --> 03:50:32.159
<v Speaker 8>the most opponents, there's kind of steps, like, first of all,

3914
03:50:32.200 --> 03:50:36.120
<v Speaker 8>do you even understand what a transcendental deduction is at

3915
03:50:36.159 --> 03:50:42.120
<v Speaker 8>the so we're kind of the logical, metapistemological level, and

3916
03:50:42.239 --> 03:50:44.479
<v Speaker 8>you put it in a form and then there's further

3917
03:50:44.799 --> 03:50:50.040
<v Speaker 8>arguments and support for that. Otherwise, Yeah, it would be

3918
03:50:50.280 --> 03:50:56.399
<v Speaker 8>simply PREMI circularity. I assume God to prove God, and

3919
03:50:56.520 --> 03:51:00.360
<v Speaker 8>I prove God because I assumed him, Like nobody makes

3920
03:51:00.399 --> 03:51:01.760
<v Speaker 8>as far as I know, that argument.

3921
03:51:06.159 --> 03:51:09.319
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for that question, Joe. Appreciate all the time

3922
03:51:09.399 --> 03:51:12.319
<v Speaker 3>stamping and hard work that you do. Wi Fi. What's up?

3923
03:51:12.360 --> 03:51:12.479
<v Speaker 5>Man?

3924
03:51:14.239 --> 03:51:14.399
<v Speaker 31>Hey?

3925
03:51:14.600 --> 03:51:14.760
<v Speaker 5>Jay?

3926
03:51:14.879 --> 03:51:15.520
<v Speaker 3>What's up? So?

3927
03:51:16.040 --> 03:51:18.479
<v Speaker 66>I'm pretty new to the debate scene, and I've been

3928
03:51:18.520 --> 03:51:22.280
<v Speaker 66>debating some atheists, so I've been eager to take more debates,

3929
03:51:22.479 --> 03:51:26.000
<v Speaker 66>and i've kind of I've taken them maybe a little

3930
03:51:26.079 --> 03:51:30.719
<v Speaker 66>too hastily. I'm debating some guys who may be bad

3931
03:51:30.840 --> 03:51:33.079
<v Speaker 66>faith or sophistry maybe the right term.

3932
03:51:33.559 --> 03:51:34.840
<v Speaker 8>I think he debated one of them.

3933
03:51:34.959 --> 03:51:37.440
<v Speaker 66>His name is Korn's and I just I guess wanted

3934
03:51:37.680 --> 03:51:40.000
<v Speaker 66>your opinion on how to deal with these types of

3935
03:51:40.040 --> 03:51:40.760
<v Speaker 66>people in debate.

3936
03:51:44.120 --> 03:51:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, honestly, I would have waste my time with debating

3937
03:51:47.440 --> 03:51:48.559
<v Speaker 3>bad faith debaters.

3938
03:51:48.639 --> 03:51:52.200
<v Speaker 4>I just think it's a massive drain. And a lot

3939
03:51:52.239 --> 03:51:54.799
<v Speaker 4>of people are a lot of people internet a board

3940
03:51:54.840 --> 03:51:57.120
<v Speaker 4>and they're just kind of like wandering around looking for

3941
03:51:57.200 --> 03:51:59.680
<v Speaker 4>something to do, and they'll just debate for the hell

3942
03:51:59.719 --> 03:52:01.799
<v Speaker 4>of it, adopting positions that they don't hold.

3943
03:52:01.840 --> 03:52:03.200
<v Speaker 3>So I would just not waste my time.

3944
03:52:03.680 --> 03:52:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I would be catechized in Orthodoxy before debating, and and

3945
03:52:07.360 --> 03:52:08.680
<v Speaker 4>to go that rout peep the sheep.

3946
03:52:08.719 --> 03:52:17.200
<v Speaker 3>What's up? Hello? Yeah?

3947
03:52:17.280 --> 03:52:17.799
<v Speaker 5>What's up? Man?

3948
03:52:20.079 --> 03:52:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Wait? Am I on?

3949
03:52:22.840 --> 03:52:23.120
<v Speaker 6>You are?

3950
03:52:24.399 --> 03:52:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

3951
03:52:25.719 --> 03:52:27.639
<v Speaker 67>I didn't expect to get on this early, kind of

3952
03:52:27.719 --> 03:52:29.360
<v Speaker 67>trying to think about what I want to say, but

3953
03:52:30.280 --> 03:52:33.239
<v Speaker 67>I just want to say I'm a big fan. I

3954
03:52:33.520 --> 03:52:36.600
<v Speaker 67>just tuned in, so I read the topics and I

3955
03:52:36.680 --> 03:52:40.719
<v Speaker 67>guess you're debating, you know, the different denominations and whatever.

3956
03:52:41.719 --> 03:52:42.760
<v Speaker 30>So where up again?

3957
03:52:43.319 --> 03:52:43.479
<v Speaker 5>Uh?

3958
03:52:43.840 --> 03:52:45.680
<v Speaker 67>Yeah, So I'm a Protestant. I grew up in the

3959
03:52:45.799 --> 03:52:52.360
<v Speaker 67>South and basically discovering your content, uh just made me

3960
03:52:52.440 --> 03:52:56.600
<v Speaker 67>realize that it was a bunch of you know byes honestly,

3961
03:52:56.840 --> 03:53:02.159
<v Speaker 67>and it was di y and kind of just being

3962
03:53:02.360 --> 03:53:06.120
<v Speaker 67>stuck in that circle and then hearing all about all

3963
03:53:06.200 --> 03:53:09.319
<v Speaker 67>the solo fide and so like solo scriptore and all

3964
03:53:09.360 --> 03:53:10.959
<v Speaker 67>that stuff, Like I never heard about any of that

3965
03:53:11.040 --> 03:53:13.639
<v Speaker 67>stuff in my life, and then you introduced me to that,

3966
03:53:13.799 --> 03:53:16.600
<v Speaker 67>and I bought an Orthodox study Bible, and I've been

3967
03:53:16.639 --> 03:53:19.440
<v Speaker 67>watching a lot of your content for years. Actually found

3968
03:53:19.440 --> 03:53:26.239
<v Speaker 67>you on f wars. But basically, okay, so yeah, I

3969
03:53:26.360 --> 03:53:29.000
<v Speaker 67>know you want a debate. You don't really like people,

3970
03:53:29.760 --> 03:53:34.239
<v Speaker 67>ah coming on here asking you questions about Catechism and

3971
03:53:34.280 --> 03:53:38.200
<v Speaker 67>all that stuff. Uh So, a couple of things I

3972
03:53:38.319 --> 03:53:40.959
<v Speaker 67>was thinking of that I've heard you mentioned before, but

3973
03:53:41.639 --> 03:53:45.399
<v Speaker 67>I'd never really felt where fleshed out completely is.

3974
03:53:48.200 --> 03:53:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's see, so.

3975
03:53:51.360 --> 03:53:56.680
<v Speaker 67>The it's kind of ambiguous because of uh I forget

3976
03:53:56.760 --> 03:54:00.479
<v Speaker 67>the terms that you said, but you said that basically

3977
03:54:00.600 --> 03:54:04.000
<v Speaker 67>scripture can be described and is it three or four

3978
03:54:04.079 --> 03:54:08.520
<v Speaker 67>different ways like ontological. I'm a bit of a slow boy.

3979
03:54:08.440 --> 03:54:09.120
<v Speaker 3>So bear with you.

3980
03:54:09.280 --> 03:54:12.680
<v Speaker 4>But no, no, no, that's that's not that. It's called

3981
03:54:13.719 --> 03:54:16.760
<v Speaker 4>the fourth senses of scripture. Yeah, talking about the literal,

3982
03:54:16.879 --> 03:54:23.719
<v Speaker 4>the literal, the spiritual, allegorical, the tropological.

3983
03:54:23.000 --> 03:54:25.959
<v Speaker 67>And the anagogical Yes, yes, yes, and that's the first time,

3984
03:54:26.360 --> 03:54:27.920
<v Speaker 67>Like I said, like, you open my eyes to a

3985
03:54:28.000 --> 03:54:28.639
<v Speaker 67>lot of that stuff.

3986
03:54:29.159 --> 03:54:32.280
<v Speaker 8>And because growing up Baptist, you know, you got.

3987
03:54:32.360 --> 03:54:34.760
<v Speaker 67>To remember a couple of verses and go to church

3988
03:54:34.840 --> 03:54:37.559
<v Speaker 67>every now and then and say that you're you know,

3989
03:54:37.719 --> 03:54:40.120
<v Speaker 67>you're moral and this and that and that's pretty much it.

3990
03:54:40.799 --> 03:54:44.440
<v Speaker 67>But I do believe what you say is true, you know,

3991
03:54:44.680 --> 03:54:47.719
<v Speaker 67>like there's a history to it and there's a reason

3992
03:54:47.799 --> 03:54:50.639
<v Speaker 67>you follow certain canons and scriptures and all that stuff.

3993
03:54:50.680 --> 03:54:52.239
<v Speaker 3>So I do agree with that.

3994
03:54:54.079 --> 03:54:57.719
<v Speaker 8>But oh yeah, So the the question I have is

3995
03:54:58.360 --> 03:55:01.000
<v Speaker 8>how do you know when to apply one of those.

3996
03:55:02.799 --> 03:55:03.760
<v Speaker 5>What was it again?

3997
03:55:03.840 --> 03:55:04.239
<v Speaker 3>I forget?

3998
03:55:04.280 --> 03:55:07.959
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, right, So these are this is called hermanudicts,

3999
03:55:08.040 --> 03:55:13.559
<v Speaker 4>which is the interpretation of the scriptures. Okay, so hermanudicts

4000
03:55:13.639 --> 03:55:16.360
<v Speaker 4>is not like there's principles and rules, but there's no

4001
03:55:17.159 --> 03:55:21.639
<v Speaker 4>hard and fast uh way or science necessarily that's going

4002
03:55:21.719 --> 03:55:27.239
<v Speaker 4>to tell you automatically when to interpret which text, just

4003
03:55:27.360 --> 03:55:30.079
<v Speaker 4>on the basis of that principle of the fourth senses.

4004
03:55:30.879 --> 03:55:36.120
<v Speaker 4>So for example, exa Jesus means reading the text, looking

4005
03:55:36.159 --> 03:55:39.959
<v Speaker 4>at the language, the context, and figuring out what the

4006
03:55:40.280 --> 03:55:44.239
<v Speaker 4>original language means and what the writers were intending to convey.

4007
03:55:44.959 --> 03:55:47.600
<v Speaker 4>So actually Jesus is just understanding the meanings of the

4008
03:55:47.639 --> 03:55:52.239
<v Speaker 4>words and the texts in a raw sense, but hermeneuticts

4009
03:55:52.440 --> 03:55:56.559
<v Speaker 4>is interpreting the text and looking at the different deeper

4010
03:55:56.719 --> 03:55:58.239
<v Speaker 4>senses and meanings that might.

4011
03:55:58.239 --> 03:55:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Also be there.

4012
03:56:00.000 --> 03:56:01.639
<v Speaker 4>So you can kind of go crazy with this like

4013
03:56:01.799 --> 03:56:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Origin did, where he over allegorized everything. But you can

4014
03:56:05.920 --> 03:56:08.639
<v Speaker 4>also be too extreme in the other direction of being

4015
03:56:08.719 --> 03:56:13.559
<v Speaker 4>a literalist or focusing on only the grammatical historical context,

4016
03:56:14.120 --> 03:56:16.639
<v Speaker 4>which is just the first layer or level of scripture.

4017
03:56:17.280 --> 03:56:20.200
<v Speaker 4>But it doesn't necessaridate that every single verse has quote

4018
03:56:20.239 --> 03:56:20.920
<v Speaker 4>four senses.

4019
03:56:21.559 --> 03:56:23.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a little more nuanced.

4020
03:56:23.040 --> 03:56:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Than that because some, you know, passages of scripture are

4021
03:56:26.920 --> 03:56:30.920
<v Speaker 4>just straightforward. They're just meant to be, for example, proverbs,

4022
03:56:31.440 --> 03:56:35.159
<v Speaker 4>although some proverbs do have a deeper spiritual significance, like

4023
03:56:35.959 --> 03:56:38.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, in the first few chapters of Proverbs, when

4024
03:56:38.319 --> 03:56:42.520
<v Speaker 4>it talks about lady Wisdom and the seven pillars that

4025
03:56:42.600 --> 03:56:44.799
<v Speaker 4>she's built her house and she brings bread and wine.

4026
03:56:44.959 --> 03:56:48.159
<v Speaker 4>That's obviously a type of the church. But a lot

4027
03:56:48.200 --> 03:56:54.239
<v Speaker 4>of the proverbs are just you know, basic wisdom, avoid wickedness,

4028
03:56:54.440 --> 03:56:56.559
<v Speaker 4>be righteous, you know what I mean, it's like, there's

4029
03:56:56.600 --> 03:56:58.479
<v Speaker 4>not four sensits of that, it's just kind of what

4030
03:56:58.600 --> 03:57:03.959
<v Speaker 4>it is. But you have to, I think, be very

4031
03:57:04.040 --> 03:57:07.799
<v Speaker 4>familiar with the Biblical literature and also different types of

4032
03:57:07.920 --> 03:57:11.479
<v Speaker 4>literature in the scriptures, such as if you're reading you know,

4033
03:57:11.760 --> 03:57:18.280
<v Speaker 4>poetic literature, prophetic literature, liturgical literature like the Psalms, historical

4034
03:57:19.040 --> 03:57:21.440
<v Speaker 4>accounts like the Book of Kings like so you got

4035
03:57:21.520 --> 03:57:23.760
<v Speaker 4>to understand the different types of literature in the Bible

4036
03:57:23.760 --> 03:57:25.959
<v Speaker 4>as well. And if you if you go to seminary,

4037
03:57:26.040 --> 03:57:29.319
<v Speaker 4>if you go to Bible school, you'll learn all this stuff.

4038
03:57:29.440 --> 03:57:32.159
<v Speaker 4>This is all just kind of basic and and all

4039
03:57:32.239 --> 03:57:36.280
<v Speaker 4>that stuff's not even unique to like Orthodoxy, Like every Protestant,

4040
03:57:36.360 --> 03:57:39.959
<v Speaker 4>Catholic Orthodox seminary will teach you all that same stuff.

4041
03:57:41.079 --> 03:57:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Job, what's up? And just had to show, I mean

4042
03:57:53.200 --> 03:57:54.239
<v Speaker 3>to boot you out how you were done?

4043
03:57:55.000 --> 03:57:59.440
<v Speaker 26>Oh no words. And this is different from about the

4044
03:57:59.520 --> 03:58:03.639
<v Speaker 26>vicious quilarity thing. It's just kind of about the first

4045
03:58:03.799 --> 03:58:07.399
<v Speaker 26>order verse second order thing. I wanted to refresh my

4046
03:58:07.559 --> 03:58:12.360
<v Speaker 26>memory on. So is it correct to say that first

4047
03:58:12.600 --> 03:58:18.000
<v Speaker 26>order statements are constitutive of second order statements?

4048
03:58:18.079 --> 03:58:18.399
<v Speaker 3>So like.

4049
03:58:20.559 --> 03:58:27.000
<v Speaker 26>If someone says God does not exist, right, like this

4050
03:58:27.120 --> 03:58:28.799
<v Speaker 26>is the whole like old j Mike thing. He likes

4051
03:58:28.840 --> 03:58:32.159
<v Speaker 26>to ask people like, does the proposition God does not

4052
03:58:32.239 --> 03:58:36.959
<v Speaker 26>exist entail a contradiction? And I was thinking about this

4053
03:58:37.479 --> 03:58:43.680
<v Speaker 26>and I think it absolutely does, because in the light

4054
03:58:43.719 --> 03:58:46.159
<v Speaker 26>of the Christian paradigm, if God does not exist, then

4055
03:58:47.280 --> 03:58:50.799
<v Speaker 26>that would destroy the possibility of knowledge to make any

4056
03:58:51.000 --> 03:58:54.079
<v Speaker 26>second order statements about first order?

4057
03:58:54.799 --> 03:58:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, is that correct?

4058
03:58:57.479 --> 03:59:02.920
<v Speaker 8>And first order is usually it's the second order our statements.

4059
03:59:03.040 --> 03:59:12.360
<v Speaker 8>First orders are Jim believes the tree is green, then

4060
03:59:12.479 --> 03:59:15.159
<v Speaker 8>Jim makes a statement I know the tree is green,

4061
03:59:15.520 --> 03:59:19.159
<v Speaker 8>or the Jim makes a statement the tree is green,

4062
03:59:19.319 --> 03:59:25.120
<v Speaker 8>which implies those are second order statements. So typically the

4063
03:59:25.200 --> 03:59:28.520
<v Speaker 8>first order is just being in the mental state of

4064
03:59:28.920 --> 03:59:29.600
<v Speaker 8>knowing something.

4065
03:59:30.159 --> 03:59:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Does that make sense? Right?

4066
03:59:33.559 --> 03:59:39.879
<v Speaker 26>First order is a knowledge claim, right, Yeah.

4067
03:59:39.719 --> 03:59:42.959
<v Speaker 8>But I want to make the difference that it's really

4068
03:59:43.120 --> 03:59:49.559
<v Speaker 8>statements are usually it's a second order beliefs that you

4069
03:59:49.680 --> 03:59:52.479
<v Speaker 8>believe something and it qualifies as knowledge as a first order.

4070
03:59:52.520 --> 03:59:55.959
<v Speaker 8>Does that make sense? So not your statement about what

4071
03:59:56.120 --> 03:59:58.440
<v Speaker 8>you believe? Those are second order?

4072
04:00:00.000 --> 04:00:01.639
<v Speaker 26>Okay, Okay, I didn't.

4073
04:00:01.799 --> 04:00:03.360
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get that, but.

4074
04:00:03.440 --> 04:00:09.319
<v Speaker 8>I would add, yes, it does entail contradiction because once

4075
04:00:09.399 --> 04:00:13.760
<v Speaker 8>you prove that God's a necessary condition uniquely, so the

4076
04:00:13.840 --> 04:00:19.000
<v Speaker 8>possibility of knowledge. They already assume the a necessary condition

4077
04:00:19.959 --> 04:00:23.600
<v Speaker 8>for the possibility knowledge because they're making knowledge statements. Then

4078
04:00:23.639 --> 04:00:27.920
<v Speaker 8>you show that it's God, but they deny God. So

4079
04:00:28.000 --> 04:00:30.879
<v Speaker 8>they're both affirming and denying the necessary condition for the

4080
04:00:30.920 --> 04:00:32.559
<v Speaker 8>possibility knowledge, which is a contradiction.

4081
04:00:36.079 --> 04:00:37.799
<v Speaker 26>Correct. Yeah, that's that makes sense.

4082
04:00:41.040 --> 04:00:43.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, thank you job. I want to go on

4083
04:00:43.239 --> 04:00:45.399
<v Speaker 3>next to Isaiah. What's up?

4084
04:00:46.639 --> 04:00:46.799
<v Speaker 5>Hey?

4085
04:00:46.959 --> 04:00:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Can you assume me? Yes, ma'am?

4086
04:00:49.840 --> 04:00:50.200
<v Speaker 44>All right.

4087
04:00:50.920 --> 04:00:54.159
<v Speaker 60>So I'm new here and lovely rooms.

4088
04:00:54.639 --> 04:00:55.360
<v Speaker 8>Hello everyone.

4089
04:00:56.000 --> 04:00:58.159
<v Speaker 60>So I had two things I'll try to be quick.

4090
04:00:58.840 --> 04:01:02.600
<v Speaker 60>The first, so the father was speaking about the freshmen

4091
04:01:02.719 --> 04:01:06.399
<v Speaker 60>being hesitant. I guess you'd say, to deal with a

4092
04:01:06.479 --> 04:01:10.959
<v Speaker 60>quinas and have those arguments. And I had the same

4093
04:01:11.040 --> 04:01:13.680
<v Speaker 60>experience myself when I was a freshman dealing with a quinas.

4094
04:01:14.200 --> 04:01:18.239
<v Speaker 60>And we were given an exercise which was interesting, where

4095
04:01:18.280 --> 04:01:20.879
<v Speaker 60>we all came up with our own arguments, and then

4096
04:01:21.479 --> 04:01:24.239
<v Speaker 60>the room was split to where half of us steelmanned,

4097
04:01:24.319 --> 04:01:26.760
<v Speaker 60>and then half of us would argue against it, and

4098
04:01:26.879 --> 04:01:30.079
<v Speaker 60>it took away like the fear of dealing with such

4099
04:01:30.120 --> 04:01:33.159
<v Speaker 60>a seminal work. And then after that no one was

4100
04:01:33.239 --> 04:01:36.000
<v Speaker 60>like deer in the headlights anymore, so maybe helpful, I

4101
04:01:36.040 --> 04:01:40.440
<v Speaker 60>don't know, but yeah, so just the thought and then yeah,

4102
04:01:40.559 --> 04:01:44.280
<v Speaker 60>in terms of you mentioned ex of Jesus, and my

4103
04:01:45.440 --> 04:01:48.120
<v Speaker 60>question for you gentlemen, as you seem to be well

4104
04:01:48.239 --> 04:01:52.360
<v Speaker 60>versed on the Greek and I've just begun getting into Greek,

4105
04:01:52.760 --> 04:01:56.399
<v Speaker 60>what do you guys think are the most interesting or relevant.

4106
04:01:58.120 --> 04:02:02.079
<v Speaker 60>I don't want to say mistranslations, but mistranslations where like

4107
04:02:02.440 --> 04:02:06.440
<v Speaker 60>things don't translate exactly into English that kind of stick

4108
04:02:06.479 --> 04:02:06.719
<v Speaker 60>out to you.

4109
04:02:10.719 --> 04:02:13.879
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a linguist and I'm not a Greek scholar,

4110
04:02:14.200 --> 04:02:17.239
<v Speaker 4>not a textual scholar, so I'm not familiar really with

4111
04:02:18.079 --> 04:02:22.000
<v Speaker 4>textual issues in translating certain terms. I mean, I know

4112
04:02:22.120 --> 04:02:24.639
<v Speaker 4>that does exist, but I don't think it really is

4113
04:02:25.600 --> 04:02:28.920
<v Speaker 4>detrimental to the overall message. I think God is able

4114
04:02:29.000 --> 04:02:32.680
<v Speaker 4>to communicate in every language the basics of the message.

4115
04:02:33.280 --> 04:02:35.719
<v Speaker 4>But there are certain languages like Greek, for example, that

4116
04:02:35.920 --> 04:02:41.399
<v Speaker 4>allow for philosophical metaphysical distinctions that languages like Latin don't have.

4117
04:02:42.120 --> 04:02:47.040
<v Speaker 4>Doctor Bradshaw, for example, argues that the essence entergiesstinction did

4118
04:02:47.079 --> 04:02:50.159
<v Speaker 4>it make sense even in the Latin language, whereas in

4119
04:02:50.319 --> 04:02:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Greek theology and philosophy.

4120
04:02:51.920 --> 04:02:52.920
<v Speaker 3>It made perfect sense.

4121
04:02:52.959 --> 04:02:54.760
<v Speaker 4>And so that's one of the reasons why the Western

4122
04:02:55.639 --> 04:02:59.319
<v Speaker 4>Latin Church fathers did not develop in the sense of

4123
04:02:59.399 --> 04:03:02.760
<v Speaker 4>explication being the center distinction that theology that the Eastern

4124
04:03:02.840 --> 04:03:06.559
<v Speaker 4>Church did. But I'm not a linguist and a scholar

4125
04:03:06.680 --> 04:03:07.920
<v Speaker 4>of texts.

4126
04:03:12.000 --> 04:03:14.399
<v Speaker 60>Okay, Yeah, I was just curious. Again, I've heard you

4127
04:03:15.159 --> 04:03:18.360
<v Speaker 60>speak of a few Greek phrases in your knowledge of them.

4128
04:03:19.239 --> 04:03:22.440
<v Speaker 60>You know, like the word sin, for example, is like

4129
04:03:22.559 --> 04:03:25.479
<v Speaker 60>the actual verb to sin is you know, it means

4130
04:03:25.520 --> 04:03:28.120
<v Speaker 60>to throw a spear and miss the target, and like

4131
04:03:28.239 --> 04:03:30.959
<v Speaker 60>that is a big difference, you know, just in the

4132
04:03:31.079 --> 04:03:34.520
<v Speaker 60>actual meaning. And so I think I think you're correct,

4133
04:03:34.559 --> 04:03:38.120
<v Speaker 60>and you know, the the application of the metaphor is

4134
04:03:38.319 --> 04:03:41.959
<v Speaker 60>obviously the same. But yeah, I was just scurious. Thanks

4135
04:03:42.280 --> 04:03:43.319
<v Speaker 60>thanks for letting me speak.

4136
04:03:44.319 --> 04:03:44.559
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

4137
04:03:44.799 --> 04:03:48.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, a lot of the Orthodox world uses a

4138
04:03:48.639 --> 04:03:52.280
<v Speaker 4>lot of terminology from the heritage of the Church and

4139
04:03:53.200 --> 04:03:55.879
<v Speaker 4>from the New Testament, but I don't know the Greek.

4140
04:03:56.520 --> 04:03:59.239
<v Speaker 4>I know the Greek alphabet, and I know a lot

4141
04:03:59.280 --> 04:04:03.000
<v Speaker 4>of the theology terms and their usage of meaning, but

4142
04:04:03.120 --> 04:04:05.159
<v Speaker 4>I do not know uh.

4143
04:04:06.360 --> 04:04:11.079
<v Speaker 3>E elect elect electorum, I Q.

4144
04:04:19.399 --> 04:04:19.959
<v Speaker 43>Are you there?

4145
04:04:29.200 --> 04:04:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Illustrationist yep, and that's me.

4146
04:04:34.280 --> 04:04:34.840
<v Speaker 5>I had.

4147
04:04:35.079 --> 04:04:38.319
<v Speaker 68>Let's see, at first, I had a few questions about predestination,

4148
04:04:38.600 --> 04:04:44.200
<v Speaker 68>but I think the orthodox understanding of predestination is pretty straightforward. Actually,

4149
04:04:44.239 --> 04:04:47.680
<v Speaker 68>you know what, I'd need some clarification because I've always

4150
04:04:47.719 --> 04:04:51.639
<v Speaker 68>had a Calvinist predisposition. So what would your the orthodox

4151
04:04:51.760 --> 04:04:53.760
<v Speaker 68>understanding of predestination be.

4152
04:04:54.920 --> 04:04:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Alright, so we already addressed this pretty extensively in the

4153
04:04:58.959 --> 04:05:01.520
<v Speaker 4>first I don't know hour, so I would just say,

4154
04:05:01.639 --> 04:05:04.319
<v Speaker 4>this is a recorded space, so you can go back

4155
04:05:04.399 --> 04:05:05.399
<v Speaker 4>and rewatch that.

4156
04:05:05.520 --> 04:05:07.719
<v Speaker 3>I don't have the energy to rehearse all that. Do

4157
04:05:07.760 --> 04:05:09.399
<v Speaker 3>you have another question, Yeah?

4158
04:05:09.479 --> 04:05:09.719
<v Speaker 9>Sure.

4159
04:05:11.399 --> 04:05:14.879
<v Speaker 68>My other question would be about essence energy distinction. I

4160
04:05:15.360 --> 04:05:18.840
<v Speaker 68>saw a clip of you being interviewed by Michael Lofton

4161
04:05:19.360 --> 04:05:21.799
<v Speaker 68>and you said something to the extent of the essence

4162
04:05:21.840 --> 04:05:24.159
<v Speaker 68>of God subsists within his energies.

4163
04:05:26.000 --> 04:05:28.360
<v Speaker 3>What's that all about? I didn't.

4164
04:05:28.680 --> 04:05:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so the energies proceed from the essence, I said.

4165
04:05:32.079 --> 04:05:37.399
<v Speaker 4>God is fully present in his energies because his actions.

4166
04:05:37.520 --> 04:05:39.639
<v Speaker 3>So just like if I build a.

4167
04:05:39.719 --> 04:05:44.440
<v Speaker 4>House, I'm fully present in my action of building a house.

4168
04:05:45.000 --> 04:05:47.799
<v Speaker 4>The action of building a house is an action proper

4169
04:05:47.920 --> 04:05:51.120
<v Speaker 4>to my nature as a human being. It's a human act.

4170
04:05:51.799 --> 04:05:55.239
<v Speaker 4>It's an act by my will. But my will and

4171
04:05:55.440 --> 04:05:58.479
<v Speaker 4>my act of building a house are not identical to

4172
04:05:58.920 --> 04:06:03.440
<v Speaker 4>or reducible to the person Jay nor my nature. So

4173
04:06:03.639 --> 04:06:07.680
<v Speaker 4>the action proceeds from my nature, but it's a personal

4174
04:06:07.840 --> 04:06:10.280
<v Speaker 4>act that I engage in in terms of the mode.

4175
04:06:10.879 --> 04:06:13.559
<v Speaker 4>So does that make sense that the person, the nature,

4176
04:06:13.799 --> 04:06:17.280
<v Speaker 4>the will, the energy, and the effect are all distinct?

4177
04:06:17.799 --> 04:06:20.440
<v Speaker 4>And if you read John of Damascus on the Orthodox

4178
04:06:20.479 --> 04:06:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Faith Book three, chapter fifteen, the very first thing he

4179
04:06:23.680 --> 04:06:27.399
<v Speaker 4>says is nature, person, will, energy and effect are all distinct.

4180
04:06:28.079 --> 04:06:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Literally the opposite of chemism.

4181
04:06:30.879 --> 04:06:31.159
<v Speaker 9>Got it?

4182
04:06:31.559 --> 04:06:34.239
<v Speaker 68>And one last thing, I know there are a lot

4183
04:06:34.239 --> 04:06:36.159
<v Speaker 68>of Protestants out there, and with the Internet, a lot

4184
04:06:36.200 --> 04:06:38.479
<v Speaker 68>of people are looking towards the Apostolic faith.

4185
04:06:39.239 --> 04:06:42.159
<v Speaker 8>Do you have any advice for anyone who's.

4186
04:06:44.959 --> 04:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I'll be blunt.

4187
04:06:47.399 --> 04:06:51.159
<v Speaker 68>I'm kind of attending a church that doesn't believe that

4188
04:06:51.600 --> 04:06:55.079
<v Speaker 68>the Communion is the real body and blood of Jesus,

4189
04:06:55.159 --> 04:06:57.959
<v Speaker 68>and I've had doubts about that, and as a result,

4190
04:06:58.120 --> 04:07:03.159
<v Speaker 68>i haven't been partaking of the symbolic Communion, and frankly,

4191
04:07:03.319 --> 04:07:05.680
<v Speaker 68>I don't know how to put my faith into practice.

4192
04:07:06.000 --> 04:07:10.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm kind of in this gray zone. Any advice to

4193
04:07:10.719 --> 04:07:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the Orthodox Church is only true church, so where you're

4194
04:07:13.879 --> 04:07:17.920
<v Speaker 3>at not a church. That's my advice. All right, appreciate it,

4195
04:07:18.079 --> 04:07:22.760
<v Speaker 3>thank you. Yeah, I would go check, you.

4196
04:07:22.799 --> 04:07:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Know, go visit Orthodox church and you will see that,

4197
04:07:26.959 --> 04:07:32.239
<v Speaker 4>you know, the liturgy at least is reverent and organized

4198
04:07:32.559 --> 04:07:34.559
<v Speaker 4>such that they believe that it is.

4199
04:07:34.600 --> 04:07:36.639
<v Speaker 3>The real presidence, or at least that's the profession of

4200
04:07:36.719 --> 04:07:37.399
<v Speaker 3>the faith.

4201
04:07:39.920 --> 04:07:44.159
<v Speaker 4>Hence the reverence and the beauty there, which does not

4202
04:07:44.280 --> 04:07:45.520
<v Speaker 4>exist in the Protestant world.

4203
04:07:46.399 --> 04:07:57.840
<v Speaker 59>Actually, jam, yeah, hey, is it all right to ask

4204
04:07:57.920 --> 04:08:00.760
<v Speaker 59>a question about the Divine Light and Saint Simeon the

4205
04:08:00.799 --> 04:08:01.520
<v Speaker 59>New Theologian.

4206
04:08:03.399 --> 04:08:05.600
<v Speaker 3>I've read two of the volumes. I haven't read all four,

4207
04:08:05.719 --> 04:08:06.920
<v Speaker 3>but I can comment on.

4208
04:08:06.959 --> 04:08:12.319
<v Speaker 59>What I know, Alrighty, So I was reading. I wasn't

4209
04:08:12.360 --> 04:08:16.559
<v Speaker 59>actually reading Saint Simeon. I planned to do that later,

4210
04:08:16.719 --> 04:08:20.799
<v Speaker 59>but I came across a quotation that where he seemed

4211
04:08:20.799 --> 04:08:24.239
<v Speaker 59>to be saying that unless one has seen the Divine Light,

4212
04:08:24.399 --> 04:08:27.239
<v Speaker 59>he can't presume to think that he knows Christ, or

4213
04:08:27.319 --> 04:08:31.079
<v Speaker 59>that he has Christ within him, or that he will

4214
04:08:31.159 --> 04:08:36.920
<v Speaker 59>be saved. And so this was concerning because I don't

4215
04:08:36.920 --> 04:08:39.719
<v Speaker 59>think anyone I know has ever seen the Divine Light,

4216
04:08:40.079 --> 04:08:43.920
<v Speaker 59>nor could I imagine myself becoming holy enough to actually

4217
04:08:43.959 --> 04:08:47.319
<v Speaker 59>receive the physical, sensory perception of the divine light.

4218
04:08:50.159 --> 04:08:50.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that.

4219
04:08:52.200 --> 04:08:55.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I need to say the contact, because first

4220
04:08:55.879 --> 04:08:59.600
<v Speaker 4>of all, he was thrown out of his monastery because

4221
04:08:59.680 --> 04:09:03.680
<v Speaker 4>he said that this was available to everyone, and then

4222
04:09:03.959 --> 04:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>that it was not a thing that was only for

4223
04:09:06.879 --> 04:09:09.959
<v Speaker 4>a chiritual elite. So this doesn't this would this would

4224
04:09:09.959 --> 04:09:14.719
<v Speaker 4>seem to contrast with his arguments because he argued that

4225
04:09:15.440 --> 04:09:18.479
<v Speaker 4>if you argue that the the parlemism was for a

4226
04:09:18.559 --> 04:09:21.680
<v Speaker 4>spiritual elite, he said it was a return of the

4227
04:09:21.719 --> 04:09:26.520
<v Speaker 4>heresy of the missallions. So the comment sounds like it

4228
04:09:26.559 --> 04:09:28.559
<v Speaker 4>would be contrary to the very thing that he dealt

4229
04:09:28.600 --> 04:09:32.239
<v Speaker 4>with in his life, and he seems to speak otherwise

4230
04:09:32.440 --> 04:09:35.479
<v Speaker 4>in the in the books. But and there also might

4231
04:09:35.520 --> 04:09:38.959
<v Speaker 4>be a situation where he's saying that something like, well,

4232
04:09:39.040 --> 04:09:42.280
<v Speaker 4>if you think you have assurance of your salvation, you

4233
04:09:42.280 --> 04:09:43.959
<v Speaker 4>would only be assured of that if you've seen the

4234
04:09:44.000 --> 04:09:44.559
<v Speaker 4>divine light.

4235
04:09:44.719 --> 04:09:47.399
<v Speaker 3>And you know hardly anybody has seen the divine light.

4236
04:09:48.000 --> 04:09:49.680
<v Speaker 3>And so I would need to I would need to

4237
04:09:49.840 --> 04:09:50.120
<v Speaker 3>see the.

4238
04:09:50.159 --> 04:09:52.079
<v Speaker 4>Context to see like what he's saying, because it doesn't

4239
04:09:52.120 --> 04:09:55.719
<v Speaker 4>sound like because I mean he he railed against Missallianism,

4240
04:09:55.840 --> 04:09:57.520
<v Speaker 4>and what you're saying sounds like Missallianism.

4241
04:09:58.639 --> 04:10:01.200
<v Speaker 59>Okay, okay, yeah, I I need to get him and

4242
04:10:01.280 --> 04:10:03.920
<v Speaker 59>read some more of him, but thank you, and I'll

4243
04:10:03.959 --> 04:10:04.479
<v Speaker 59>probably come.

4244
04:10:04.440 --> 04:10:05.559
<v Speaker 18>Back after i've read something.

4245
04:10:06.120 --> 04:10:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Do you know where that quote is?

4246
04:10:08.760 --> 04:10:10.799
<v Speaker 59>If I'm not mistaken, I think it might have been

4247
04:10:11.120 --> 04:10:19.159
<v Speaker 59>in the Saint Vladimir's publish publishing of the of his

4248
04:10:19.440 --> 04:10:20.399
<v Speaker 59>h Now that's the that's.

4249
04:10:20.319 --> 04:10:21.959
<v Speaker 3>The four volumes. But do you know which are the

4250
04:10:22.040 --> 04:10:22.639
<v Speaker 3>four volumes?

4251
04:10:23.799 --> 04:10:23.879
<v Speaker 5>Now?

4252
04:10:23.879 --> 04:10:25.399
<v Speaker 59>I'm gonna have to read it because I came across

4253
04:10:25.440 --> 04:10:26.840
<v Speaker 59>it all nine but I don't have the money to

4254
04:10:26.879 --> 04:10:27.440
<v Speaker 59>buy it right now.

4255
04:10:27.479 --> 04:10:29.159
<v Speaker 18>But once I do, I'm gonna give it a read.

4256
04:10:30.520 --> 04:10:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well, DM me about it, because I'd be curious

4257
04:10:32.840 --> 04:10:34.760
<v Speaker 3>to go and look it up. But like I said,

4258
04:10:34.760 --> 04:10:36.239
<v Speaker 3>I only have two of the four volumes. I ever

4259
04:10:36.280 --> 04:10:36.680
<v Speaker 3>read them all?

4260
04:10:37.680 --> 04:10:39.120
<v Speaker 59>Alrighty, sure thing, I'll get back with you.

4261
04:10:43.319 --> 04:10:46.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, And also, I might just not know what

4262
04:10:46.399 --> 04:10:49.159
<v Speaker 3>he's talking about, so I know some of you might

4263
04:10:49.920 --> 04:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>doubt this, but like I've not read all the books.

4264
04:10:52.120 --> 04:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>So what's up, Brian?

4265
04:10:55.479 --> 04:10:55.559
<v Speaker 9>Up?

4266
04:10:55.600 --> 04:10:56.000
<v Speaker 5>What up?

4267
04:10:56.360 --> 04:10:57.079
<v Speaker 3>Just real quick?

4268
04:10:57.440 --> 04:11:03.280
<v Speaker 69>I just wanted to add something regarding the communion. Jesus

4269
04:11:03.360 --> 04:11:05.959
<v Speaker 69>said very clearly in the Bible, if you read in

4270
04:11:06.040 --> 04:11:07.319
<v Speaker 69>the King James.

4271
04:11:08.479 --> 04:11:10.200
<v Speaker 6>Or the older versions.

4272
04:11:10.280 --> 04:11:15.600
<v Speaker 69>On top of that, that you're to receive food and

4273
04:11:15.840 --> 04:11:19.799
<v Speaker 69>water and wine, and I guess beer and other things.

4274
04:11:20.399 --> 04:11:23.680
<v Speaker 69>With Thanksgiving supposed to pray over your food. You're supposed

4275
04:11:23.680 --> 04:11:27.879
<v Speaker 69>to pray over your water. My kids they pray over

4276
04:11:28.920 --> 04:11:34.639
<v Speaker 69>you know, certain law enforcement officials or politicians, or kids

4277
04:11:34.879 --> 04:11:39.680
<v Speaker 69>or teachers in their lives, and they earnestly and honestly

4278
04:11:40.840 --> 04:11:44.399
<v Speaker 69>before they receive their food or their drink, you know,

4279
04:11:44.520 --> 04:11:46.520
<v Speaker 69>they put blessings on it.

4280
04:11:46.959 --> 04:11:49.680
<v Speaker 41>And I think that's what communion it really is about.

4281
04:11:51.840 --> 04:11:57.040
<v Speaker 41>I am a Protestant, but I'm a non church going Protestant.

4282
04:11:57.680 --> 04:12:01.399
<v Speaker 41>I used to be in Christian ministry very college, and

4283
04:12:01.520 --> 04:12:05.600
<v Speaker 41>I realized real quick how corrupt these buildings are. So yeah,

4284
04:12:05.799 --> 04:12:08.559
<v Speaker 41>pray over your food, thank you for your time, appreciate

4285
04:12:08.600 --> 04:12:08.920
<v Speaker 41>you guys.

4286
04:12:12.399 --> 04:12:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's way more than that, because it's

4287
04:12:14.639 --> 04:12:18.319
<v Speaker 4>the institution of the Lord's Supper. Even in Paul's epistles,

4288
04:12:18.920 --> 04:12:22.079
<v Speaker 4>it's more than merely praying over food. If you read

4289
04:12:22.239 --> 04:12:26.200
<v Speaker 4>the Book of Hebrews, it's the fulfillment of the Old Testament,

4290
04:12:26.360 --> 04:12:30.559
<v Speaker 4>alter and temple sacrifice, and Paul says in Hebrews thirteen

4291
04:12:30.680 --> 04:12:33.840
<v Speaker 4>that we have an altar from which the people who

4292
04:12:33.920 --> 04:12:35.120
<v Speaker 4>serve at the tabernacle have.

4293
04:12:35.159 --> 04:12:36.000
<v Speaker 3>No right to eat.

4294
04:12:36.680 --> 04:12:40.360
<v Speaker 4>So right away you have a sacrificial element. You have

4295
04:12:40.680 --> 04:12:45.000
<v Speaker 4>a ministerial element of the Melchizedekian priesthood from Hebrews seven,

4296
04:12:45.760 --> 04:12:51.040
<v Speaker 4>all of which suggests that this low church idea of Protestantism,

4297
04:12:51.120 --> 04:12:54.479
<v Speaker 4>that it's some mere meal, misses the whole point of

4298
04:12:54.600 --> 04:12:59.280
<v Speaker 4>what was established, which is a feast that deifies us.

4299
04:13:01.079 --> 04:13:01.879
<v Speaker 3>A wolf.

4300
04:13:08.079 --> 04:13:08.280
<v Speaker 14>God.

4301
04:13:08.360 --> 04:13:17.000
<v Speaker 29>I'm you, thanks for taking my call. Yeah, I wanted

4302
04:13:17.079 --> 04:13:19.920
<v Speaker 29>to talk about atheism. I'm not an atheist, but I

4303
04:13:20.040 --> 04:13:23.440
<v Speaker 29>think atheists are kind of weak with their arguments, and

4304
04:13:23.559 --> 04:13:25.920
<v Speaker 29>I kind of want to help them because they don't

4305
04:13:26.000 --> 04:13:29.040
<v Speaker 29>seem to want to tell the truth about being an atheist.

4306
04:13:29.760 --> 04:13:32.920
<v Speaker 29>Let's say I was an atheist and I wanted to,

4307
04:13:33.239 --> 04:13:37.040
<v Speaker 29>you know, little mind exercise. Why would I even care

4308
04:13:37.079 --> 04:13:41.520
<v Speaker 29>about anybody's morals? Why would I just not care about

4309
04:13:41.719 --> 04:13:45.559
<v Speaker 29>just planning my seat and my children and then letting

4310
04:13:45.680 --> 04:13:47.920
<v Speaker 29>them take off and do whatever they're going to do

4311
04:13:48.040 --> 04:13:51.840
<v Speaker 29>and make sure that they live to take over. It's

4312
04:13:51.959 --> 04:13:55.680
<v Speaker 29>like murder, rape or whatever. It seems like they don't

4313
04:13:55.760 --> 04:13:57.559
<v Speaker 29>have the guts to admit the truth.

4314
04:13:58.760 --> 04:13:58.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

4315
04:13:59.000 --> 04:14:00.719
<v Speaker 4>I think that's actually a very for set the point

4316
04:14:00.719 --> 04:14:07.639
<v Speaker 4>about atheists that atheism is a intellectual pretended position, but

4317
04:14:07.680 --> 04:14:09.719
<v Speaker 4>they don't really usually live it out.

4318
04:14:11.360 --> 04:14:13.520
<v Speaker 29>Yeah, not to say that I feel that way, but

4319
04:14:13.639 --> 04:14:17.440
<v Speaker 29>I just can't understand if I did, I can't understand

4320
04:14:17.520 --> 04:14:20.959
<v Speaker 29>why they wouldn't just tell the truth like the books

4321
04:14:21.079 --> 04:14:24.280
<v Speaker 29>done and stuff. I would want to guarantee my seed

4322
04:14:24.479 --> 04:14:26.719
<v Speaker 29>rules the world, you know, if if I.

4323
04:14:26.840 --> 04:14:32.239
<v Speaker 3>Had exactly wandven what's up, Caleb?

4324
04:14:37.840 --> 04:14:40.200
<v Speaker 15>Oh, sorry, I've this is the first time I've done this.

4325
04:14:40.520 --> 04:14:44.600
<v Speaker 15>I was muted, so I am Pentecostal. I even went

4326
04:14:44.639 --> 04:14:48.360
<v Speaker 15>to Bible College for a little bit, but I found

4327
04:14:48.399 --> 04:14:52.559
<v Speaker 15>it to be very disorderly. And I've been interested in

4328
04:14:52.719 --> 04:14:57.200
<v Speaker 15>Orthodoxy for a long time because everything seems to be

4329
04:14:58.120 --> 04:15:00.319
<v Speaker 15>pretty ordered out on what we need to do for

4330
04:15:00.440 --> 04:15:01.399
<v Speaker 15>every specific thing.

4331
04:15:02.079 --> 04:15:03.280
<v Speaker 3>And I went to a.

4332
04:15:04.000 --> 04:15:09.120
<v Speaker 15>Orthodox church in my town recently, just a couple months back,

4333
04:15:09.200 --> 04:15:13.879
<v Speaker 15>to see how things were. And I'm not exactly a

4334
04:15:14.000 --> 04:15:17.440
<v Speaker 15>total iconoclast, but I was. I was a little bit like, WHOA,

4335
04:15:17.600 --> 04:15:21.159
<v Speaker 15>this is real different. But none of that is exactly

4336
04:15:21.239 --> 04:15:27.520
<v Speaker 15>why I was confused. I just talked to a priest

4337
04:15:27.600 --> 04:15:29.760
<v Speaker 15>in training. I don't know if his official title was

4338
04:15:29.799 --> 04:15:32.520
<v Speaker 15>a deacon or something like that. I'm not familiar with

4339
04:15:32.559 --> 04:15:35.959
<v Speaker 15>a lot of the language, but he told me, and

4340
04:15:36.040 --> 04:15:38.479
<v Speaker 15>I don't know if this is the official outlook of

4341
04:15:38.559 --> 04:15:43.559
<v Speaker 15>the Orthodox Church, that the Book of Revelation, due to

4342
04:15:43.680 --> 04:15:48.479
<v Speaker 15>some historical issue or something that I don't understand or

4343
04:15:48.559 --> 04:15:53.639
<v Speaker 15>can't remember, isn't treated as total canon. Or maybe it

4344
04:15:53.799 --> 04:15:55.840
<v Speaker 15>was canon and they just don't use it often. I

4345
04:15:56.000 --> 04:15:56.920
<v Speaker 15>just don't remember.

4346
04:15:57.280 --> 04:16:00.440
<v Speaker 3>I just what is that about. I'm not quite sure

4347
04:16:00.479 --> 04:16:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I understand that.

4348
04:16:02.360 --> 04:16:02.399
<v Speaker 5>No.

4349
04:16:02.479 --> 04:16:04.799
<v Speaker 4>I think that's just simply he was just simply incorrect.

4350
04:16:05.760 --> 04:16:08.879
<v Speaker 4>Some of the old, older lists do not list the

4351
04:16:08.920 --> 04:16:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Book of Revelation, and so he might be just looking

4352
04:16:11.559 --> 04:16:15.319
<v Speaker 4>at one of the older lists, to say, from the Canons,

4353
04:16:15.399 --> 04:16:20.239
<v Speaker 4>the Apostolic Canons Canon eighty five, but eventually by the

4354
04:16:21.239 --> 04:16:24.479
<v Speaker 4>the Ecumenical Council, when it lists the canon, it does

4355
04:16:24.559 --> 04:16:27.040
<v Speaker 4>include the Book of Revelation. So some people just look

4356
04:16:27.040 --> 04:16:29.319
<v Speaker 4>at different lists that are older, and I think he

4357
04:16:29.440 --> 04:16:30.280
<v Speaker 4>was just misinformed.

4358
04:16:31.200 --> 04:16:33.239
<v Speaker 15>Okay, well, thanks, I'll go ahead and try it again

4359
04:16:33.280 --> 04:16:36.079
<v Speaker 15>and just see how it is. Because I was very interested.

4360
04:16:36.159 --> 04:16:38.360
<v Speaker 15>I was just real put off because it was like, well,

4361
04:16:38.399 --> 04:16:39.879
<v Speaker 15>if we can't trust the Bible, what are we doing?

4362
04:16:39.959 --> 04:16:40.120
<v Speaker 5>Man?

4363
04:16:40.520 --> 04:16:46.079
<v Speaker 3>I didn't it was yeah, thank you. I don't think

4364
04:16:46.120 --> 04:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>it's an issue of not trusting the Bible.

4365
04:16:48.040 --> 04:16:50.600
<v Speaker 4>It's just that the Book of Revelation was a very

4366
04:16:51.120 --> 04:16:55.479
<v Speaker 4>hotly debated text for many centuries. If you look on

4367
04:16:55.559 --> 04:16:59.479
<v Speaker 4>my wall right now, you can see the I retweeted

4368
04:16:59.520 --> 04:17:04.959
<v Speaker 4>the Baptist scholar Lee McDonald where he's talking about Athanasians

4369
04:17:05.000 --> 04:17:09.639
<v Speaker 4>having to convinced the bishops in Rome that Revelation was canonical.

4370
04:17:10.239 --> 04:17:13.879
<v Speaker 3>So it has a debated history. But some people might

4371
04:17:14.000 --> 04:17:17.319
<v Speaker 3>just think that the Apostolic canon eighty five, which is

4372
04:17:17.360 --> 04:17:20.079
<v Speaker 3>from about the three hundreds, they might think that that's

4373
04:17:20.159 --> 04:17:24.559
<v Speaker 3>the quote right list, but actually the Ecumenical Council is

4374
04:17:24.639 --> 04:17:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the right list, which later does include Revelation.

4375
04:17:28.360 --> 04:17:31.200
<v Speaker 15>Okay, all right, well, thank you very much. I appreciate

4376
04:17:31.239 --> 04:17:33.920
<v Speaker 15>your time. Thanks again, have a good day.

4377
04:17:36.040 --> 04:17:42.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, anytime. Last one, mkg.

4378
04:17:48.799 --> 04:17:52.520
<v Speaker 47>Heja and pray all as well. I had a question

4379
04:17:52.680 --> 04:17:57.200
<v Speaker 47>actually about something you touched on two calls ago regarding

4380
04:17:57.280 --> 04:18:01.959
<v Speaker 47>an counterargument. So when I'm explained the monarchy of the

4381
04:18:02.040 --> 04:18:05.360
<v Speaker 47>Father and essentially saying that the word and the Spirit

4382
04:18:05.559 --> 04:18:08.879
<v Speaker 47>come from him, that is his word, his spirit. What

4383
04:18:09.000 --> 04:18:11.319
<v Speaker 47>do I do when someone accuses me of modalism.

4384
04:18:16.879 --> 04:18:20.319
<v Speaker 4>Well, when you've had early church fathers like Turtullian, and

4385
04:18:20.440 --> 04:18:23.559
<v Speaker 4>I think even the Cappadocians, when they use the analogy

4386
04:18:24.079 --> 04:18:28.360
<v Speaker 4>of word and spirit, it's just an analogy. It's not

4387
04:18:28.680 --> 04:18:33.200
<v Speaker 4>equated to intended to give you, like the full meaning

4388
04:18:33.319 --> 04:18:35.799
<v Speaker 4>of hypostasis and nature.

4389
04:18:36.159 --> 04:18:39.959
<v Speaker 3>So it's like an analogy. So in other words, people

4390
04:18:40.000 --> 04:18:44.040
<v Speaker 3>can read too much into the analogies. That makes sense, Yeah,

4391
04:18:44.079 --> 04:18:45.079
<v Speaker 3>I guess, I just.

4392
04:18:47.000 --> 04:18:49.239
<v Speaker 47>I guess I had a good structure in my mind

4393
04:18:50.159 --> 04:18:52.399
<v Speaker 47>for how to relate to the Trinity, and when I

4394
04:18:52.520 --> 04:18:57.239
<v Speaker 47>explain it, that's the only counter that I'm having a

4395
04:18:57.319 --> 04:18:59.760
<v Speaker 47>hard time justifying.

4396
04:19:03.680 --> 04:19:08.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean even word in spirit though, Like the

4397
04:19:10.280 --> 04:19:13.799
<v Speaker 4>analogy is used to explain how something can be one

4398
04:19:14.040 --> 04:19:16.280
<v Speaker 4>and many at the same time. Right, So I'm a

4399
04:19:16.360 --> 04:19:21.719
<v Speaker 4>person and I have you know, a word that I speak,

4400
04:19:21.799 --> 04:19:24.639
<v Speaker 4>and then there's a breath that accompanies the word, and

4401
04:19:24.760 --> 04:19:29.000
<v Speaker 4>so it's a limited analogy that's intended to explain an

4402
04:19:29.079 --> 04:19:34.360
<v Speaker 4>eternal action of spiration and generation. It's not an analogy

4403
04:19:34.479 --> 04:19:39.239
<v Speaker 4>intended to explain that there's only one person in God

4404
04:19:39.479 --> 04:19:45.040
<v Speaker 4>and that word and spirit are actions, so the analogy

4405
04:19:45.079 --> 04:19:49.159
<v Speaker 4>would be confusing action or energy with person or hypostasis.

4406
04:19:49.879 --> 04:19:52.280
<v Speaker 4>So do you see how these these kinds of analogies

4407
04:19:52.319 --> 04:19:52.920
<v Speaker 4>are very limited?

4408
04:19:52.959 --> 04:19:55.319
<v Speaker 47>Yeah, no, that makes sense that the final point that

4409
04:19:55.399 --> 04:19:58.040
<v Speaker 47>you made that click for me. Can I ask one

4410
04:19:58.079 --> 04:20:04.440
<v Speaker 47>more question? So I'm actually writing a paper and I

4411
04:20:04.600 --> 04:20:08.520
<v Speaker 47>wanted to know if you had some primary sources in

4412
04:20:08.639 --> 04:20:14.559
<v Speaker 47>mind regarding the schism and specifically regarding the whole philioque thing,

4413
04:20:15.280 --> 04:20:19.360
<v Speaker 47>if you knew of any primary sources, not secondary, that

4414
04:20:19.440 --> 04:20:20.159
<v Speaker 47>I could look to.

4415
04:20:23.879 --> 04:20:26.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what the primary sources would be, Like

4416
04:20:26.159 --> 04:20:31.159
<v Speaker 4>ancient excommunication documents between Rome and the East.

4417
04:20:31.200 --> 04:20:33.040
<v Speaker 47>What do you mean like of the time you know,

4418
04:20:33.719 --> 04:20:38.159
<v Speaker 47>of the time of the schism basically you know, Father's

4419
04:20:38.200 --> 04:20:40.680
<v Speaker 47>writing about it and their issues with it, and the

4420
04:20:40.760 --> 04:20:44.840
<v Speaker 47>counter arguments of the West. Basically, not a secondary source

4421
04:20:46.000 --> 04:20:47.159
<v Speaker 47>if you had any mind.

4422
04:20:49.600 --> 04:20:50.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know off the top of my head what

4423
04:20:51.000 --> 04:20:54.440
<v Speaker 4>the primary source would be. I'm sure there's ancient Vatican,

4424
04:20:54.920 --> 04:20:57.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, excommunication documents or something like that.

4425
04:20:58.120 --> 04:20:59.639
<v Speaker 47>All right, well, I appreciate it.

4426
04:21:00.959 --> 04:21:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Oh that's it. Thanks, Yeah, it's all good. Yeah,

4427
04:21:18.319 --> 04:21:58.440
<v Speaker 3>what's up? Pedro? You gotta arm youre man? What's up, hey, Pedro?

4428
04:21:58.479 --> 04:22:13.360
<v Speaker 3>You gotta ut man? All right?

4429
04:22:13.360 --> 04:22:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, Pedro's not gonna say anything, so I guess we'll

4430
04:22:16.280 --> 04:22:18.639
<v Speaker 4>just call it a night. Thank you, guys, a lot

4431
04:22:18.680 --> 04:22:21.600
<v Speaker 4>of fun, good conversations. I didn't think James White would

4432
04:22:21.600 --> 04:22:22.399
<v Speaker 4>show up, but that's okay.

4433
04:22:22.840 --> 04:22:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh here he is just right behind you. Look out,

4434
04:22:26.600 --> 04:22:28.520
<v Speaker 3>he's behind me in person here in New Orleans.
