Speaker 1: This is six g agenda. I'm your host Andrew, my
Speaker 1: boy justin Ward on the chords again yo, and we
Speaker 1: talk about what they want. Welcome back, We've got some
Speaker 1: new listeners. Welcome, Welcome, super exciting. Please you know, follow us.
Speaker 1: We need some love there, a little bit of comments,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. Just hit us with some
Speaker 1: a little bit of a little support. Outside of that,
Speaker 1: Thank you, Welcome again, and uh yeah, well we'll be
Speaker 1: upgrading here soon. So like we hear now, it's gonna
Speaker 1: get better. Be outside of that. Last week we uh
Speaker 1: what we get into. We got into the accelerationism. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: crazy tech guys. This week, uh you know, we got
Speaker 1: chill cast today, so we're gonna kind of be all
Speaker 1: over a little bit. We got some cool modern or
Speaker 1: well current events going on right now today. Did you
Speaker 1: see Ben and Jerry, Like the Ben from Ben and Jerry,
Speaker 1: he got thrown out of that courtroom. Have you seen
Speaker 1: that he got thrown out of a courtroom because pretty
Speaker 1: much he was yelling that in the middle of this courtroom.
Speaker 1: He was just screaming with these other protesters about how
Speaker 1: the government's you cutting medicaid and welfare and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: And they're essentially they're just trying to use it to
Speaker 1: fund the genocide and Gaza. And I think you mentioned
Speaker 1: something about.
Speaker 2: Oh, that's pretty deep bro for ice cream.
Speaker 1: Yeah, he's deep, dude, that guy's deep. Well, they're both like,
Speaker 1: I mean not to say, you know, they've both always
Speaker 1: been like kind of advocates, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: They've always been like political advocates. I think that they've
Speaker 1: usually been on the right side of most history. I mean,
Speaker 1: they didn't get too leftists. I don't think that I
Speaker 1: recall during like the crazy woke days, so that's always good.
Speaker 1: But what I wanted to point out was just to
Speaker 1: kind of prove what he's saying. I see an article
Speaker 1: today that says, when trillion cuts in Medicaid and food
Speaker 1: stamps is being proposed, I think that's funny because we
Speaker 1: just talked about how the military budget is going to
Speaker 1: be a trillion dollars and that happens to be exactly
Speaker 1: what they're trying to, you know, cut out of medicaid
Speaker 1: and and food stamps. So I think that what Ben
Speaker 1: was getting kicked out of the courtroom for was pretty
Speaker 1: damn legit. Yeah, I mean, he's just trying to call
Speaker 1: it out, and uh, you know, he just gets carried
Speaker 1: out and then most of it gets covered up by
Speaker 1: some of the stuff will be getting into the diddy
Speaker 1: shit and all that nasty. You hear the raunchy stuff
Speaker 1: coming out of that dude, it's gotten rawnchys speaker too.
Speaker 1: I can't even imagine, dude, we'll get into it. But yeah, man,
Speaker 1: I just think it's crazy. You know, it's so transparent.
Speaker 1: They're clearly broadened for war with Iran and Ran right now,
Speaker 1: and yeah, it's just so obvious. You know, they're trying
Speaker 1: to transfer the trillion dollars of the military from welfare,
Speaker 1: which is crazy. But yeah, outside of that, I just
Speaker 1: think it is sad. But also it's it's like kind
Speaker 1: of gets right into what we mentioned before about it's
Speaker 1: very transparent. You know that this military industrial complex really
Speaker 1: holds a huge toll on every president, even the ones
Speaker 1: against it. Yeah, outside of that, you know, we aren't
Speaker 1: going to get into the South America or Africa genocide
Speaker 1: stuff right now, but I'm kind of watching that kind
Speaker 1: of play out. I just think that's funny. I think
Speaker 1: think he's really just trying to point out, like a genocide.
Speaker 1: He's like, no, no, don't worry about the genocide over here.
Speaker 1: Look over there, there's white people being killed in Africa.
Speaker 1: Can you believe it. It's like, I mean, one thing
Speaker 1: at a time, dude, Let's end the genocide in Israel,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean?
Speaker 2: God Like Trump's Trump forces South African president.
Speaker 1: To watch himself.
Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, yeah, And you can see Trump sitting in
Speaker 2: the background like yeah, bitch.
Speaker 1: Yeah, He's like, oh, oh, you said you're not killing farmers. Well, hey,
Speaker 1: bring that TV in here. Let me show you do
Speaker 1: we have that tape? Yeah, let me show you where
Speaker 1: you said you're gonna do that. But you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: like I said, I do think it's a little bit
Speaker 1: of a smoke screen for the actual genocide going on
Speaker 1: that we are actually funding. And I think that that
Speaker 1: is kind of the you know, kind of more worth
Speaker 1: looking at right now. And uh, I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: any of it's bad obviously, but that's just crazy. So secondly,
Speaker 1: before we get into some of my theories on this
Speaker 1: Diddy stuff, uh, which we're gonna try to bring a
Speaker 1: different approach because you know, everybody's just trying to talk
Speaker 1: about the crazy like stuff coming out in court. We'll
Speaker 1: get into that a little bit, but yeah, I just
Speaker 1: want to point out this theory I have. But first off,
Speaker 1: I do want to say one, we do espouse some
Speaker 1: Bill Cooper stuff, but I do understand. I want to
Speaker 1: make this clear, like the guy wasn't, you know, the
Speaker 1: holder of all knowledge or anything. He definitely got some
Speaker 1: things wrong. He definitely wasn't right about everything, but he
Speaker 1: had a lot of I mean, that guy really did
Speaker 1: have a lot going on that was true. So you know,
Speaker 1: just want to point that out. I'm not beholden to
Speaker 1: any particular view. Same thing with Sean Ryan. I do
Speaker 1: want to point out, you know, I did say before
Speaker 1: I think he's a controlled op. I hope I didn't
Speaker 1: say that. I think I might have said something more
Speaker 1: along the lines of like if he doesn't know it,
Speaker 1: then there's people coming in and doing it to him,
Speaker 1: which he even admitted that himself in this recent interview
Speaker 1: with Tucker Carlson. So I just want to say, like,
Speaker 1: the guy seems more trustworthy than initially just the whole
Speaker 1: show just from the outside looking in right away without
Speaker 1: really digging into it, like just seemed like a a
Speaker 1: weird intelligence hill tactic. You know what I mean. But
Speaker 1: you know, when we look deeper at the guy himself,
Speaker 1: I just think that that was wrong in me to
Speaker 1: do that, and uh yeah, so I just tried to
Speaker 1: I'm trying to show that we try to be objective
Speaker 1: about whether it's things I believe or things that you know,
Speaker 1: I don't believe. Whatever. Either way, I just want to
Speaker 1: remain open minded. I don't know everything. But also like, yeah, man,
Speaker 1: I just remained skeptical. I think that that's healthy.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I want to I made a comment saying
Speaker 2: like his fans are something about whoah Americans.
Speaker 1: But which they are. They're military guys. Oh yeah, but
Speaker 1: for them they should be who I mean, They're not
Speaker 1: all that wrong with that.
Speaker 2: Essentially, what I'm saying is if Sean Ryan is somehow
Speaker 2: listening to this, I doubt it. Uh love you man,
Speaker 2: love you man.
Speaker 1: Yeah, my boy justin really you know. And I've been
Speaker 1: listening to my man Sam. Uh you know, a very
Speaker 1: good friend of mine. He'sn't one who showed me and
Speaker 1: I was like, dude, he's awesome, and you know, I
Speaker 1: listened to him and everything. But like I said, whenever,
Speaker 1: there's just weird ladies coming on talking about there's terrorist
Speaker 1: cells being built up in America, and then right after that,
Speaker 1: a guy from Fort Bragg runs down people in New
Speaker 1: Orleans and he's got the nicest flag, and it's like
Speaker 1: they're trying to pin things on terrorists that are really
Speaker 1: going on domestically from like our own guys. It's just
Speaker 1: weird to me. I just like to point that out.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of where I was coming from with
Speaker 1: that in the Fort Brag episode, because we were coming
Speaker 1: in from that objective of like, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: weird stuff coming out of Fort Brag that has led
Speaker 1: into domestic terrorism incidents, a lot of them, and so
Speaker 1: you know, it's worth looking at everybody involved that's been
Speaker 1: in that or around it, you know. So we're just
Speaker 1: trying to be objective but also point things out that
Speaker 1: other people don't really seem to get to. And sometimes
Speaker 1: that puts you, uh, that puts you in a position
Speaker 1: where you can get burned for sure, and we understand that.
Speaker 1: So that's why we're just trying to make sure point
Speaker 1: out the objectivity that we try to have. But outside
Speaker 1: of that, I do want to point out that Sean
Speaker 1: Ryan did get into some things that really did make
Speaker 1: me kind of change my mind, and I do want
Speaker 1: to point out what it was, because one of them
Speaker 1: was kind of exactly what I wanted to talk about here,
Speaker 1: which was the fact that, well, you know that Epstein
Speaker 1: situation blackmail intelligence in the massade. He kind of mentioned
Speaker 1: that he thinks that that's kind of what's going on
Speaker 1: behind the Epstein stuff. That's deeper than I would expect
Speaker 1: him to kind of go. I also think it was
Speaker 1: crazy that, you know, they were talking about how they
Speaker 1: don't believe the FBI director and the bon Joni guy
Speaker 1: or whatever that says that they just looked at all
Speaker 1: the stuff with Epstein and he definitely killed himself, and
Speaker 1: he was even skeptical of that. Now, I mean, these
Speaker 1: things just let lay more credence because he's being very
Speaker 1: objective in the fact that he was saying that why
Speaker 1: haven't more people He's pointing out something I wanted to
Speaker 1: point out, which was nobody's pointing at the people that
Speaker 1: Epstein was apparently procuring these children for. Yeah, nobody's looking
Speaker 1: at the people like all these people that obviously he
Speaker 1: like were really involved with this. He was kind of
Speaker 1: more of just the low guy that was procuring them,
Speaker 1: and the fact that seum Ryan said that, and the
Speaker 1: fact that he said that the reason why nobody came
Speaker 1: out and said, hey, I was blackmailed. I had no idea,
Speaker 1: and this guy really was into some weird stuff. And
Speaker 1: as soon as like a caught wind that one time
Speaker 1: he tried to blackmail me, I got out of there
Speaker 1: after that, and you know, something like that. But he
Speaker 1: said they're repeat customers and that's why you haven't seen
Speaker 1: anybody do that. And I think that that's a great take,
Speaker 1: and honestly, one hundred percent, Yeah, that just makes me
Speaker 1: think like that and a few other things, like the
Speaker 1: guy's really trustworthy. I think that him admitting that, hey man,
Speaker 1: I've probably had guys come in here that like we're
Speaker 1: assets trying to work, you know, a narrative into the interview.
Speaker 1: That's also something else to like I never heard him
Speaker 1: say anything like that, and him saying that lays more
Speaker 1: credence to like, yeah, me believing him. And also like
Speaker 1: that's kind of what we brought up, was that if
Speaker 1: he doesn't know there's people coming in there and doing it,
Speaker 1: and I mean whatever, maybe an intelligence accent would acknowledge
Speaker 1: that too. Who knows, Yeah, just can. But either way,
Speaker 1: that's some some fun stuff. Yeah, due that interview was
Speaker 1: pretty good with them too. They went into some cool
Speaker 1: stuff with that Epstein blackmail and all that. I think
Speaker 1: that it was worth seeing if you haven't seen it.
Speaker 1: But yeah, so with the Diddy stuff in my opinion,
Speaker 1: and it does relate into the Epstein stuff, Like I said,
Speaker 1: low hanging fruit, I think Diddy just kind of I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: he was getting he got caught up, you know with
Speaker 1: the Cassie court case in twenty twenty three, which was
Speaker 1: a civil case he paid like twenty million dollars. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and so that's what kind of sparked off him getting
Speaker 1: the criminal case kicked off, which now you have Cassie
Speaker 1: the same person testifying and all this stuff going on now.
Speaker 1: But in my opinion, I think this is a very
Speaker 1: big humiliation ritual more than it is a we're trying
Speaker 1: to get this guy and put him in prison, you think, so, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I really do. And the reason why I think that
Speaker 1: is it wasn't consented. I won't go as far to
Speaker 1: say it was all consensual, but it was. Yes, he
Speaker 1: held his power over people. Yes he was shitty in
Speaker 1: that regard and a one hundred percent like they were
Speaker 1: an abusive relationship. In the defense, I mean, the prosecution
Speaker 1: rather is doing a great job at building that narrative
Speaker 1: of like, what are you gonna do if you have
Speaker 1: no money and this guy is the only guy supporting you,
Speaker 1: and then at the same time you're being abused sexually
Speaker 1: and physically. I get it, one hundred percent. I agree
Speaker 1: with that statement. But what about the alleged kids that
Speaker 1: were involved. We're not going to go there. You know,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of other things involved where I think
Speaker 1: that they're trying to just get him with a thing,
Speaker 1: to just pin him down. But I mean, yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: there's more to uncover there that nobody's really touching. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and that makes me think that, Look, there was a
Speaker 1: deal made where they say, look, we're not going to
Speaker 1: charge you for all the kids stuff. We're not going
Speaker 1: to charge you for all the actual things. That would
Speaker 1: you know, completely upheave everything. But because then they would
Speaker 1: be looking more into who's at the parties with Diddy?
Speaker 1: You know what I mean? If you know if the
Speaker 1: kids are involved, now you're looking at who's involve at
Speaker 1: the parties. You're not just looking at Diddy anymore? Right,
Speaker 1: So why wouldn't you just humiliate the shit out of him,
Speaker 1: destroy his reputation, and then tell him, look is a
Speaker 1: trade off. I'm not gonna charge you with all the
Speaker 1: other stuff, but we're gonna humiliate you and destroy your reputation.
Speaker 1: We're gonna say that you have dudes finish on women
Speaker 1: and then bring it into you so that way they
Speaker 1: could rub it on you. Yeah, that's crazy.
Speaker 2: What about all these alleged like freak off tapes that
Speaker 2: they got. Did you hear what I just said people
Speaker 2: getting fucked?
Speaker 1: Did you hear what I just said? Yeah? That's literally
Speaker 1: I just don't even I mean, okay, part of my
Speaker 1: brain says, I can't even believe that. Okay, sure, yeah,
Speaker 1: that guy probably did do that. I do believe it.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, it's like this has to
Speaker 1: be some kind of humiliation ritual. Like I don't think
Speaker 1: that this is gonna be a He's not gonna go
Speaker 1: to prison for like ever, you know what I mean. Like,
Speaker 1: that's just I just don't see that happening. They're not
Speaker 1: throwing a bunch of witnesses at him and really solidifying
Speaker 1: the whole deal, because yeah, I just think that this
Speaker 1: is kind of a show trial because there's a lot
Speaker 1: to be I mean, I'll get into it all the
Speaker 1: kids that were involved that apparently there's civil cases with
Speaker 1: Like I think it's upwards of twenty different kids that
Speaker 1: like are involved with civil cases right now that they
Speaker 1: don't have to disclose if they pay money out to
Speaker 1: these people. So you'll never know if he paid ten
Speaker 1: million dollars to this kid's family because he raped it, Like,
Speaker 1: you won't know, you see what I'm saying. So I
Speaker 1: don't know. I just think that, uh yeah, it's a
Speaker 1: little bit like the Epstein thing where it's like, look,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get a guy and then leave the rest
Speaker 1: out of it. You know.
Speaker 2: Well, I thought I heard that it became such a
Speaker 2: serious deal because he was the sex workers that he
Speaker 2: was getting were illegals.
Speaker 1: See, I don't know about that. I don't think so
Speaker 1: maybe they were, though yeah, maybe they were. But I
Speaker 1: think that the idea is that you are sex trafficking
Speaker 1: when you because he brought them over state lines, so
Speaker 1: they got them on sex trafficking because of that, because
Speaker 1: you're bringing sex workers over states. So like there's things
Speaker 1: like that that he did that constitute him? But my
Speaker 1: point is, whenever you take that on its face, that's
Speaker 1: not the same thing as like running real sex trafficking ring.
Speaker 1: So you see what I'm saying. So he's not gonna
Speaker 1: get charged the same way. But it looks bad so publicly,
Speaker 1: like I'm saying, it looks terrible, he's getting charged with
Speaker 1: sex trafficking. But when it all is said and done,
Speaker 1: he's gonna get some years in prison. Sure, I'm not
Speaker 1: saying the guy's gonna get off scott free. But my
Speaker 1: point is that there's a lot it's being left on
Speaker 1: the table, just like with Epstein, a lock I left
Speaker 1: on the table, and Sean Ryan pointing that out really
Speaker 1: lays creatments for me to believe in him, because I
Speaker 1: was gonna go that direction today with this was the
Speaker 1: fact that yeah, nobody went after Epstein, like who was
Speaker 1: involved with Epstein besides just Laine, But everybody agrees that
Speaker 1: Epstein and just Laine were procuring these women children or
Speaker 1: other people in elites and print you know, kings whatever
Speaker 1: like that. I mean, what he's going to ignore that
Speaker 1: move on? I mean, for obvious reasons. These people we
Speaker 1: are very powerful, But yeah, I mean what about all
Speaker 1: the celebrities that were with Diddy on those nights, you know.
Speaker 1: And then there's this lady Tiana who like says that
Speaker 1: there was like child age people at one of these
Speaker 1: parties she was at, and all of his people for
Speaker 1: his lawsuit and everything is claiming that, you know, she's
Speaker 1: full shit, which of course they would. I don't know
Speaker 1: who she is, I.
Speaker 2: Mean, yeah, I'm not uh, I mean me personally, I
Speaker 2: have not heard anything about any children. But that kind
Speaker 2: of proves you.
Speaker 1: Right, that just came from one person. But here's the
Speaker 1: thing though, that makes sense. But Okay, she might be
Speaker 1: full shit until I talk about the civil cases he's
Speaker 1: involved in with actual children, and then it's like, well,
Speaker 1: maybe she's not full of shit, because I mean, we
Speaker 1: know Justin Bieber was kind of underage whenever a lot
Speaker 1: of celebrities were messing with him, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: So yeah, as far as uh, let's get into some
Speaker 1: of that allegations involving minors. Ten year old boy. In
Speaker 1: October twenty twenty four, a lawsuit was filed a ledging
Speaker 1: that Combs drugged and sexually assaulted a ten year old
Speaker 1: boy in New York seventeen year old MTV show making
Speaker 1: the band in two thousand and eight, apparently during an audition,
Speaker 1: Comb's in a bodyguard SAA, a seventeen year old thirteen
Speaker 1: year old. In twenty twenty four December, a civil lawsuit
Speaker 1: accused Combs and jay Z of drugging and are in
Speaker 1: a thirteen year old girl, which people have heard about
Speaker 1: that recently because that was in twenty twenty five where
Speaker 1: the lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed. And I think that's when
Speaker 1: people finally heard about it. And jay Z kind of
Speaker 1: like said, I got nothing to do this whatever, which
Speaker 1: maybe I'm not. This is all lleged, and I understand
Speaker 1: that it's all conjecture, but at the same time, how
Speaker 1: much are we leaving on the table?
Speaker 2: Yeah, none of this is technically proven, but uh uh
Speaker 2: Tania Wallace's account uh and in the TEMs, he presents
Speaker 2: the downfall of Diddy Inside the Freak Offs, she said
Speaker 2: at one of the parties, she observed individuals, as she
Speaker 2: described as little people in quotes, dressed as Pardjuku barbies.
Speaker 1: Yep, that's yep, that's the one that she was saying
Speaker 1: that I heard, which ones again? You know, that's one
Speaker 1: person's testimony about like kids that nobody else has said.
Speaker 1: But when you mix that with the civil cases he
Speaker 1: is going through with children involved, that lays a little
Speaker 1: bit more credence.
Speaker 2: This is so fucked man. Imagine like he had so
Speaker 2: much going for him, so.
Speaker 1: Much going for him. He's been like out of the
Speaker 1: he'd been out of the main picture for a while.
Speaker 1: He just really like put on an artists. Well he's
Speaker 1: a record label.
Speaker 2: Guy, not necessarily in the public eye regard, but as
Speaker 2: far as money, it was fine.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, he was. I mean he was hanging out
Speaker 1: with like apparently he was hanging out like the Prince
Speaker 1: of Saudi Arabia, Like he was out there chilling.
Speaker 2: I guess how we got rid of his boredom? Just yeah,
Speaker 2: pretty get freaky fucked way to get rid of your born.
Speaker 2: They're talking about like days, weeks. Sometimes they'd be no, yeah,
Speaker 2: I guess it's crazy.
Speaker 1: But wait, here's the crazy one that kind of just
Speaker 1: came out too. Was apparently there was pills on them
Speaker 1: with Obama's face or pills with Obama's face on them.
Speaker 1: Now here's the thing. Okay, I love this, Malley. I'll
Speaker 1: take Molly every day anyway. Yeah, Tasa was some sprite. Yeah,
Speaker 1: where's the hot dog?
Speaker 2: Obama?
Speaker 1: Where's the hot dogs? All the hot dogs in the
Speaker 1: emails anyway? No check me out. Though. You remember Christy
Speaker 1: Tigan and John Legend in that one place where they
Speaker 1: it was like at a red carpet event and they said,
Speaker 1: Christy Tiaguan started to talk about Obama's parties. Dude. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this made me think about that because I'm like, wait
Speaker 1: a minute, it he's got crazy parties, freak offs, right,
Speaker 1: Obama has apparently had, like, you know, a lot of
Speaker 1: freakoffs too. I'm gonna skip past that really quickly because
Speaker 1: I don't want to get kill by the ex president.
Speaker 1: But outside of that, I mean, really weird shit is
Speaker 1: with Obama. But what I'm saying is Christy Teagan started
Speaker 1: to slip up with John Legend and be like, oh,
Speaker 1: Obama's got the best parties. You remember Obama or whatever,
Speaker 1: because they asked her who throws the best parties? And
Speaker 1: then John Legend kind of looks at her. He's like, yo,
Speaker 1: shut up, like what are you doing? Yeah, and then
Speaker 1: she's like, oh, you know, and this kind of stops talking,
Speaker 1: and that kind of means nothing just on its face.
Speaker 1: But then when you take that and you're like, why
Speaker 1: are they carrying pills around with Obama's face? It like, dude,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but there there might be a connection there.
Speaker 1: Whenever you're talking about freak offs and celebrities hanging out
Speaker 1: with the elite politicians and then you're talking about kids
Speaker 1: and you're talking about what pizza gate at this point,
Speaker 1: that's that's where we're at right now. We're pretty much
Speaker 1: talking about that. Not to say that that's true, but
Speaker 1: what I'm saying is there's something to it, and we'll
Speaker 1: get into the elite global pedophilewering one day whenever we
Speaker 1: have subscribers behind a paywall, because there's no way I'm
Speaker 1: talking about that for free.
Speaker 2: They were getting Obama because I.
Speaker 1: Want to keep myself cure. It has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with anything like, oh I want to make money to talk.
Speaker 1: It's just really like I'm scared to talk about it unless,
Speaker 1: like I know, there's an incentive, what the hell. But anyway, so, yeah, man,
Speaker 1: I don't know him. Having Obama's face on those bills
Speaker 1: kind of freaky. It's like a homage to the party
Speaker 1: being dude.
Speaker 2: It's almost it's like he had his own little MK
Speaker 2: ultra going on, you know. Oh yeah, he was controlling.
Speaker 1: The way that girl described it was that the music
Speaker 1: was disorienting and that that there's drugs, you know, and
Speaker 1: you're seeing people like trans and everything else like you
Speaker 1: never usually see, right having sex out in the open,
Speaker 1: naked right out the open in the living rooms. Imagine
Speaker 1: going through that. Remember when I talked about disassociating with
Speaker 1: the MK ultra shit when you're going through imagine that scenario.
Speaker 1: You walking in that room and you're sober, you would
Speaker 1: dissociate what you're going through. Yeah, just like of what
Speaker 1: you're seeing and processing all that horror. Right. So that's
Speaker 1: kind of where I'm going with it, which is like, yeah,
Speaker 1: there's a systematic and by the way, this goes back
Speaker 1: to like the Greek Ionesian cult shit where they would
Speaker 1: all get drunk and get naked and all fucking do
Speaker 1: orgies Like this goes back to like Greek cults, So
Speaker 1: it's not like a new thing. And that's what I
Speaker 1: mean by the mental conditioning part. That is real And
Speaker 1: honestly they use orgies, drug induced crazy music orgies, Yeah,
Speaker 1: to get people to kind of like you know they
Speaker 1: call it shadow work and the carl Ewing stuff, but
Speaker 1: essentially it's like you face the darkest part of yourself,
Speaker 1: weirdest kink you have, whatever it is, and you face
Speaker 1: it head on, and then you gain a new identity.
Speaker 1: You're pretty much reborn. That's kind of like a weird
Speaker 1: things like side thing, but like, yeah, that's real. I
Speaker 1: think that's what they're doing, like for real. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: they're trying to get people to do it just by
Speaker 1: walking into the party. And I even know that that's
Speaker 1: really what's about to happen to them. They're about to
Speaker 1: like be a new person by the time they leave.
Speaker 2: They gets just left with that Obamacare and then all
Speaker 2: of a sudden they're down to fucking dude at Obamacare.
Speaker 1: God, well he cares a whole lot. Yeah dude, No, man,
Speaker 1: that's crazy thought her mind. Yeah. Yeah, I mean the
Speaker 1: first thing that came to my mind was just that
Speaker 1: Chrissy t game whenever she said that, and uh yeah,
Speaker 1: I was just like, man, now that makes a little
Speaker 1: bit more sense. I've heard anybody else talk about that.
Speaker 1: And to be honest with the Diddy stuff, I just
Speaker 1: really wanted to point out I don't care to like
Speaker 1: really point out everything he did. But I do want
Speaker 1: to bring up just the fact that, like, I think
Speaker 1: they're leaving stuff on the table, and uh, I think
Speaker 1: it's funny. Kid Cutty. Did you know Kik Cutty's supposed
Speaker 1: to be testifying. He's supposed to testify today because apparently
Speaker 1: because as he cheated on Combs with Cuddy and then
Speaker 1: said he was going to blow up his car, and
Speaker 1: then his car ends up being blown up in his
Speaker 1: driveway like a little while later. He didn't get hurt
Speaker 1: or anything, but very weird. But that's a wild beef
Speaker 1: I had no idea about.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Ventura's mother and associate corroborated Ventura's accounts, detailing and
Speaker 2: instances of physical abuse and threats, including an alleged attempt
Speaker 2: by Combs to fire box I'm a wrapper Kid Cutty's
Speaker 2: car out of jealousy. He fire bombed it. Bro.
Speaker 1: Oh that's not It's like my top cocktail kind of thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, dude, come on, man, Yeah, that's if your girl,
Speaker 2: if your girl left you and went somewhere else. I
Speaker 2: don't think it's worth throwing a fucking.
Speaker 1: No, it's truly not.
Speaker 2: I mean, you know, to each their own. I guess
Speaker 2: the dude's.
Speaker 1: Power hungery psycho. I mean really, at the end of
Speaker 1: the day, like you know, he has people, he treats
Speaker 1: people things for two weeks or whatever where they're just
Speaker 1: hanging out with him and he's just giving them whatever
Speaker 1: they want. And then at the end of the two weeks, Hey,
Speaker 1: it's time to have a freak off. You think you're
Speaker 1: going home now? My god, Wait a minute, No, no, we're
Speaker 1: just starting. We were just starting. Oh yeah, yeah, you've
Speaker 1: been here two weeks, but you don't understand we're about
Speaker 1: to just now start having fun. You can't leave. I
Speaker 1: just I just bought you whatever you wanted this past
Speaker 1: two weeks. Don't you think that now you need to
Speaker 1: stay here? He was like, and do what I say.
Speaker 2: I just bother these gifts for you, did all you did,
Speaker 2: you all favors. Now you're gonna do something for me? Exactly,
Speaker 2: get over here. Like you see that video when him
Speaker 2: and Justin Bieber reunited or whatever, he says, Uh, why
Speaker 2: don't you come hang.
Speaker 1: Out with me anymore? Man? Why don't you come hang
Speaker 1: out with me anymore?
Speaker 2: You can just see Justin's face, He's just inters No,
Speaker 2: that's a sad Get me out of here.
Speaker 1: I know, that's a sad one, especially when we see
Speaker 1: like how Justin looks now like, I'm sure that a
Speaker 1: lot of it is like he's not. I don't think
Speaker 1: he like went off the deep end. But what I'm
Speaker 1: saying is he clearly has uh suppressed traumas that he
Speaker 1: had to go through, you know what I mean. Like, yeah,
Speaker 1: he had everybody being like crazy weird, you know, child
Speaker 1: lover to him. Whenever he was first coming out, everyone
Speaker 1: was specializing that Oprah Ellen like it didn't matter. You know.
Speaker 1: It was almost like they were doing some weird like
Speaker 1: public stunt of like let's normalize this or see if
Speaker 1: we can. You know, whenever you really take a look
Speaker 1: at it, it might have been what they were doing.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you know what, I actually found out something.
Speaker 2: I guess. So Bieber in twenty twenty two was going
Speaker 2: bankrupt or whatever, and he sold his music catalog mm.
Speaker 1: Hmm, yeah, solely for million I saw that the other day.
Speaker 2: I didn't know that.
Speaker 1: They said because he's broken the article just to throw
Speaker 1: an extra dig Well yeah, yeah, I feel like assholes.
Speaker 2: They're like, he's broke as fuck. He homeless.
Speaker 1: That was such Yeah, because we'll get into the Harley
Speaker 1: Passion Act suit again, because you know that's his his guy, right,
Speaker 1: that's his trainer. So like, I don't know, man, how
Speaker 1: much of this is an attack by the classic dude
Speaker 1: that fucking attacks everybody else is his trainees?
Speaker 2: Well, what if it really was someone like theory real quick?
Speaker 2: What if Bieber was paying someone to keep someone something quiet.
Speaker 2: He's like, no, I don't want this exposed.
Speaker 1: Or maybe that, or maybe it's an incentive his incent
Speaker 1: defication if that's a word, like incentivizing him to not
Speaker 1: say anything by just bashing his life because maybe he's
Speaker 1: you know what I mean. I mean, like mis bashing
Speaker 1: of Justin Bieber started after the p Diddy shit. It's
Speaker 1: almost like they're trying to de incentivize him to speak up,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean? Yeah, I don't know. That's
Speaker 1: a total conjecture statement for sure, but whatever. But yeah,
Speaker 1: So what I do see with the Diddy stuff kind
Speaker 1: of parallels with Epstein, And I was gonna get into
Speaker 1: that because we haven't really got into the Mega group
Speaker 1: and we haven't gotten into Epstein and Lex Wexner and
Speaker 1: the connections with them and why it matters.
Speaker 2: Yeah, just real quick. Apparently apparently in a new documentary
Speaker 2: it was because he was on the verge of quote
Speaker 2: unquote financial collapse, uh in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1: I don't understand how, dude, people still have to be
Speaker 1: playing his music.
Speaker 2: I mean, I imagine so.
Speaker 1: But you know what I mean, Like he sold it
Speaker 1: for two I don't know who knows, man. I don't
Speaker 1: know how that works when you're all, you know, wherever,
Speaker 1: you're done for a few years and you're just making
Speaker 1: orldsy checks or whatever. Yeah, that's nuts. That sucks. They
Speaker 1: all fall but uh yeah. So Whitney Webb, she wrote
Speaker 1: a book. It's called One Nation Under Blackmail, Part one
Speaker 1: and two. She's an investigative journalist and she has done
Speaker 1: a great job at laying out intricate connections between Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein and the Mega Group and various intelligence agencies, particularly
Speaker 1: Israel's Massad, and her work suggests that Epstein's activities really
Speaker 1: aren't isolated incidents, but more part of a broader network
Speaker 1: involving organized crime, intelligence operations, and influential figures, which is
Speaker 1: kind of what we're arguing here, and that's kind of
Speaker 1: why we're going to get into it because the ditties thing,
Speaker 1: I think is just an extension of what we're looking
Speaker 1: at here in the celebrity world. I think it runs
Speaker 1: through everything, and it's micro versions, you know, whether it's
Speaker 1: celebrities or whether it's politicians or whatever. I think that
Speaker 1: to have influence, you have to be influenced or blackmailed,
Speaker 1: because otherwise, especially nowadays, they control the influence a little
Speaker 1: bit more. But yeah, The Mega Group was founded in
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety one by a man named Leslie Wexner and
Speaker 1: Charles Bramfman. If you don't know, Leslie Wexner is a
Speaker 1: man that owns Victoria's Secret and he gifted Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna ballpark it like one hundred million dollar mansion
Speaker 1: in New York. Just gave it to him. There you go,
Speaker 1: maybe it's ten million. Just gave it to him. And
Speaker 1: so that's really weird, you know, unless you really understand
Speaker 1: kind of the connection with everybody behind the scenes, and
Speaker 1: then it kind of starts to make sense. So the
Speaker 1: Mega Group is a collective of influential Jewish businessmen and philanthropists.
Speaker 1: Members include notable figures such as Michael Steinhardt, Steven Spielberg
Speaker 1: and Ronald Lauder. While the group publicly focuses on philanthropic endeavors,
Speaker 1: Web's research indicates deeper ties to intelligence operations in organized
Speaker 1: crime networks. Epstein's relationship with Leslie Wexner, a co founder
Speaker 1: of the Mega Group, was particularly significant because, like I said,
Speaker 1: he gave him that house. Western provided Epstein with substantial
Speaker 1: financial support, and Web posits that Epstein's close ties to
Speaker 1: Wexner and other Megagroup members facilitated his access to powerful
Speaker 1: networks and may have been instrumental in the alleged blackmail operations,
Speaker 1: which one hundred percent I mean this guy, let I mean, dude.
Speaker 1: They had a meeting with Bush. I want to say
Speaker 1: it was like a year after nine to eleven, or
Speaker 1: maybe a little before. And as soon as they had
Speaker 1: a meeting, it was like a couple guys from the
Speaker 1: Mega Group, And as soon as they had a meeting
Speaker 1: with Bush, the next day he announces that we're going
Speaker 1: to go to war with Iraq. And then after that
Speaker 1: they announced that we're going to go to war with
Speaker 1: like multiple countries. That's whenever that general comes out and
Speaker 1: he says they have a plan to go to war
Speaker 1: with seven countries in seven years. I brought that up
Speaker 1: here in the last ones Iran, and we haven't gone
Speaker 1: to war with Iran yet, but I just saw an
Speaker 1: article today saying Israel is gonna attack Iran. If you remember,
Speaker 1: whenever Trump was assassinated or assassination attempt to happen, it
Speaker 1: was being said that Iran had multiple hits on Trump.
Speaker 1: It also was said when the drones were here that
Speaker 1: there was a mothership off the coast put thereby Iran.
Speaker 1: So you see the rhetoric being built up towards this
Speaker 1: outside enemy that we have to go to war with.
Speaker 1: And I've had this theme in my podcast talking about
Speaker 1: this where we clearly see what's building up right now,
Speaker 1: and I think Trump's going to be the guy. I
Speaker 1: think he's really pussy footing around it. He really is
Speaker 1: trying not to, but I do think at the end
Speaker 1: of the day, it's gonna happen. Right now, we're doing
Speaker 1: the classic thing, which Jimmy Dore I got to give
Speaker 1: him his credit. He pointed out that we're kind of
Speaker 1: we're putting out negotiations that we know that they won't
Speaker 1: agree with, just so that way we could say, well, look, man,
Speaker 1: we try to negotiate. Now we got to go in
Speaker 1: there and handle it, you see what I mean. Yeah,
Speaker 1: And this goes all the way back to Obama. Remember
Speaker 1: whenever Obama was president, they had a nuclear like packed
Speaker 1: where they were like, look, you can have nuclear facilities,
Speaker 1: but we're going to come and inspect them every year
Speaker 1: to make sure that you're not creating nukes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, make sure they're up.
Speaker 1: You remember that. Like we were younger back then there,
Speaker 1: I want to say, I was like, I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: there's twenty twelve, you know what I mean, like twenty ten.
Speaker 1: So I mean, yeah, man, this has been a long
Speaker 1: time coming, you know. Yeah, Iran shit. But uh yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that there's definitely, uh definitely something to the
Speaker 1: Iran shit. I mean they've definitely been building that up
Speaker 1: for a minute. But yeah. So with the Mega Group,
Speaker 1: the idea is kind of that the intelligence agency. A
Speaker 1: lot of the intelligence agencies around the world are set
Speaker 1: up mainly by crime syndicates. I want to say, back
Speaker 1: in the forties maybe fifties, Jewish crime syndicates. And when
Speaker 1: we think of the mafia, we mainly think about Italian mobs, right,
Speaker 1: we don't really think about the Jewish mafia. The Jewish
Speaker 1: mafia actually was kind of running shit and do it
Speaker 1: more shit like the casinos that we sit here and
Speaker 1: say it was the Italian mob or whatever, like no, no, no,
Speaker 1: the Jewish crime Syndicate was more involved with a lot
Speaker 1: of the mob shit than historically put And so yeah,
Speaker 1: that's kind of an arm of what we're talking about.
Speaker 1: And then you got the intelligence agency, and then you
Speaker 1: got the Hollywood aspect of it, right, you got the
Speaker 1: entertainment side. And this is why people say it's all
Speaker 1: done by the Jews, and it's all ran by the Jews,
Speaker 1: And I get why they say that, but it's not
Speaker 1: the Jews. It's the Zionists. And there's a big difference
Speaker 1: between the Jews and the Zionists, which I've said this
Speaker 1: multiple times, But Zionists, it's all about the state that
Speaker 1: they want to have where Palestine is supposed to be.
Speaker 1: It's all about Jews having the right to a state.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of Jews that don't even agree that
Speaker 1: they need to have a right to a particular piece
Speaker 1: of land. A lot of them do not agree with that.
Speaker 1: So the Zionist idea is just like really a land
Speaker 1: grab kind of like I keep wanting to say, Magnakarta,
Speaker 1: but it's a manifest destiny of Really, I look at
Speaker 1: it like the Thirteenth Tribe of Israel, which is a
Speaker 1: British Zionist organization that views themselves as part of the
Speaker 1: Israeli tribe that went off to Britain and Europe, and
Speaker 1: they think that they are like Jews or whatever, just
Speaker 1: because it all comes down to biblical prophecy and like
Speaker 1: chosen people. It's all stupid shit. Really, none of it matters.
Speaker 1: It's all just control shit that they use for power
Speaker 1: grabs and land grabs in important trade areas for resources,
Speaker 1: because really that's all it is. It's about the oil.
Speaker 1: It's all about the pipelines we need to make and
Speaker 1: the high speed trains that we need to build so
Speaker 1: we can get exports and imports going better. And these
Speaker 1: people are fucking that up. That's really what it comes
Speaker 1: down to. But I insert that they kind of knew
Speaker 1: that this was kind of the way that they needed
Speaker 1: to go in the future for resources, because when the
Speaker 1: Schofield Bible was made and all this stuff, they had
Speaker 1: to have known something about why was that area significant
Speaker 1: that they chose it all the way back then. It
Speaker 1: can't just be resources now, or is it? You know
Speaker 1: what I mean, Like, that's a weird I don't know.
Speaker 1: I haven't answer that one, but that's a weird one.
Speaker 1: I've been kind of knocking around where it's like, what's
Speaker 1: important about that particular land that they just have. Is
Speaker 1: it just the tribal aspect of it to create certain
Speaker 1: world wars that will then bring in the new world
Speaker 1: order that they're trying to bring in? Maybe yeh could
Speaker 1: really all this be like five d chests thinking ten
Speaker 1: steps ahead, We're gonna draw a line here so that
Speaker 1: with these tribes, fight with these tribes and then boom,
Speaker 1: you know, eventually we're going to have what we're looking for.
Speaker 1: Everybody's fighting with each other to the point of divide
Speaker 1: and conquer.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that could be a plausible ingenius.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's what we do with our special operations
Speaker 1: military guys. Now they go and infiltrate is said area,
Speaker 1: and they go around acting like they are from there,
Speaker 1: and then eventually they like take over, They build a
Speaker 1: network there and then they take over. The British has
Speaker 1: been doing that for a long time. It's literally what
Speaker 1: they're the best at they're the best to go in
Speaker 1: and infiltrating cultures, learning everything that they practice, and then
Speaker 1: kind of like finding a way to kind of like
Speaker 1: gain their trust or like take them over in that
Speaker 1: weird way. We did that Saudi Arabia a long time ago.
Speaker 1: And then well, not we, the British, and then that's
Speaker 1: who they blame on nine to eleven on And that's
Speaker 1: all funny to me because I understand the intricacies of oh,
Speaker 1: you're blaming that country which really is tied to this country,
Speaker 1: which really is tied to us, So is it us
Speaker 1: when we're playing like some weird middleman games.
Speaker 2: It's almost like how uh they say, uh, fraud like
Speaker 2: money in government fraud. Money just gets moved through accounts
Speaker 2: and stuff like that. Yeah, in this case, it's just
Speaker 2: the blame. The blame just gets moved through countries. The
Speaker 2: finger just gets moved to a certain somebody to point at.
Speaker 1: Oh, one hundred percent just gets guided there. Yeah, that's
Speaker 1: kind of five they chets, you know where it's like
Speaker 1: we're thinking ten twenty steps ahead, we know what you'll do,
Speaker 1: and then if you we know the five scenarios that
Speaker 1: you may do, and then we got answers for all
Speaker 1: five that kind of stuff. Yeah, but yeah, so hold
Speaker 1: on a second. So yeah. General Wrighthart Gellen, who served
Speaker 1: as the German's Army intelligence chief for the Eastern Front
Speaker 1: drooring World War two, established a post war intelligence network
Speaker 1: that the US Army and later the CIA supported. The
Speaker 1: network was known as the Gellen Organization, employed numerous former
Speaker 1: Nazis and war criminals. It eventually became the West German
Speaker 1: Federal Intelligence Service the B and D. The cia is
Speaker 1: collaboration with Gellen has been a subject to controversy due
Speaker 1: to the organizations Nazis affiliations, And all I'm pointing out
Speaker 1: is that our intelligence agencies were created by Zionists, but
Speaker 1: they work with Nazis because there's really no difference. Operation
Speaker 1: Gladio was a clandestine NATO initiative during the Cold War
Speaker 1: involving stay behind armies in Europe prepared to counter potential
Speaker 1: Soviet invasions. Some of these networks have been implicated in
Speaker 1: false flag terror attacks and political manipulations. So pretty much
Speaker 1: with this demonstrate is that intelligence agencies have historically engaged
Speaker 1: in covert activities to blur the lines between defense and
Speaker 1: subversion and well that kind of got into a weird
Speaker 1: gladio thing, but that's the false flag, like we're going
Speaker 1: to use this that we could do the five D
Speaker 1: chess thing that you were kind of talking about, that's
Speaker 1: the kind of stuff that they use. And this is
Speaker 1: all tactics to kind of go like what you're looking
Speaker 1: at now with Israel and not letting the food and
Speaker 1: the medicine in is very similar to the kind of
Speaker 1: siege tactics and war tactics and the whole We're gonna
Speaker 1: get rid of the women, the children, everybody's our enemy.
Speaker 1: Gaza is what we want. We want to take it all.
Speaker 1: I mean that is literally said on their news channels
Speaker 1: by people that are like pushing for this war at Israel.
Speaker 1: This is all like Nazi tactic war mangering. This is
Speaker 1: the way they did war. We're gonna kill them all,
Speaker 1: fucking women, children, doesn't matter. Everybody's gone. And that's when
Speaker 1: I'm pointing out that these victims quote unquote are no
Speaker 1: better than the people who persecuted and put them in
Speaker 1: that country that they're in in nineteen forty eight in
Speaker 1: the first place. That's kind of why I'm pointing out
Speaker 1: and really maybe it was just yeah, I mean whatever,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna get that deep on it, but who knows.
Speaker 1: But that's why Operation paper Clip matters, because yeah, the
Speaker 1: nazis just disseminating all over the place, and then corporatism
Speaker 1: growing out of that, Consumerism growing out of that ultra
Speaker 1: consumerism to the point of we just want convenience has
Speaker 1: grown out of that. And now look at what grows
Speaker 1: out of convenience. You want convenience to keep pouring in.
Speaker 1: Every new technological convenience that you get is a new
Speaker 1: clamp down system of control, tracking or surveillance. Look at
Speaker 1: the evolution of that. That's what I'm trying to point out.
Speaker 1: It's not like, oh, in the past ten years this
Speaker 1: has been happening. What I'm pointing out is that's about
Speaker 1: when it started. Look at the evolution and here we
Speaker 1: are now. I think the new world word is finally coming,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean, Like, that's what I'm pointing out.
Speaker 2: What do you think I can when you get to
Speaker 2: explain it and shit like that, it gets freaky Yeah,
Speaker 2: I know, well, okay.
Speaker 1: How many times have you seen people say, like, all
Speaker 1: the list out all the corporations that were started by
Speaker 1: the Nazis or Germans. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Corporism
Speaker 1: was created out of that. Who's the best corporate owners?
Speaker 1: The Jews, Well, let's call them Zionists because it's not
Speaker 1: just the Jews. And that's what I'm pointing out because
Speaker 1: the zion Is so the same thing. Is this the
Speaker 1: idea is the super race that they want to build?
Speaker 1: Does that sound familiar? That's what the Nazis used to say.
Speaker 1: That's kind of what I'm pointing out. So so we.
Speaker 2: Got to watch for these people got away with words,
Speaker 2: with coercing people into thinking, oh, this shit's okay. Yeah,
Speaker 2: they're like, hey, we're over there and we're fucking Mrking
Speaker 2: women and children. Y'all cool with that.
Speaker 1: All you have to do is look at their own
Speaker 1: news stations and you'll hear them say that, yeah, with
Speaker 1: no shame. But then in America we're like, well they're
Speaker 1: not really doing that, you know what I mean, Like
Speaker 1: the articles and shit here, they'll be like, well, that's
Speaker 1: not really what's happening. This is what's happening. They're like
Speaker 1: saving face for them. It's like, well, then why are
Speaker 1: they saying that they're doing it? Like they're saying that
Speaker 1: they're doing it, and you're trying to tell me that
Speaker 1: they're not. But I'm more inclined to believe the person
Speaker 1: doing it and what they're saying than I am the
Speaker 1: person trying to like save face because we back them,
Speaker 1: and that's really what it is.
Speaker 2: I think it's kind of sad when the evidence is
Speaker 2: all there. Yeah, the evidence is all there, and you
Speaker 2: can still deny it.
Speaker 1: To the point where you have people like Sean Ryan,
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson, like people are just calling it out with
Speaker 1: huge platforms that you know, who really runs our country?
Speaker 1: Is there a foreign country running our country? Like? Who
Speaker 1: are we really beholden to? Why is America falling behind
Speaker 1: so many other countries? And technology? Why are there underground
Speaker 1: bunkers being created everywhere with all the technology that we've
Speaker 1: been suppressed on. Yeah, you know things like that. It
Speaker 1: all goes together where it's like, hmm, who's really doing that?
Speaker 1: I do have a fun little idea that I'm kind
Speaker 1: of working out the kings on. We may do an
Speaker 1: episode on this later. Okay, so you know we're in
Speaker 1: a solar maximum right now. Right this is a big segue.
Speaker 1: We're pretty much done with that stuff. We're just talking
Speaker 1: about play it out there right now. We might get
Speaker 1: back to it, but it's pretty much gone. So if
Speaker 1: you want to hear more about that, I said, leave
Speaker 1: a comment. Tell me which we hear more about. I'll
Speaker 1: get deep. But yeah, so solar maximum, the last time
Speaker 1: we were in one of those, we had that what
Speaker 1: is that event? The Carrington event happened.
Speaker 2: Right, Carrington Cash Carrington event.
Speaker 1: It happened last time we were in a solar maximum.
Speaker 1: And I had somebody point out to me kind of
Speaker 1: a fellow Truther buddy that I met on the old
Speaker 1: Reddit hole. But uh, yeah, dude, this motherfucker was really
Speaker 1: pointed out something that kind of came to my mind recently,
Speaker 1: but he went a little bit deeper on it. So
Speaker 1: what came to my mind was all the planes crashing, right,
Speaker 1: what's up with that? The orbs we were seeing in
Speaker 1: this sky? Yeah, people were seeing northern lights all the
Speaker 1: way down in Alabama. This is from somebody who actually
Speaker 1: told me that. He said he's seen the northern lights
Speaker 1: in Alabama twice this year. And there was strange sky
Speaker 1: phenomenon around the drone sidings like orange or orbs which
Speaker 1: we've talked about, and that's kind of why I'm pointing out.
Speaker 1: And what about the blackouts in Spain in Portugal? Do
Speaker 1: you think any of this happens to do or has
Speaker 1: to do with, like the solar maximum that we're in.
Speaker 2: Well, all of those symptoms are related to this Carrington event.
Speaker 1: Right, And like what about that? Yeah, and the planes
Speaker 1: and shit falling. Now, last time this happened, well.
Speaker 2: There was an eighteen fifty.
Speaker 1: Nine minimum amount of electricity was like none, So we
Speaker 1: don't really know all the things that would happen, but
Speaker 1: one could assume that when you have northern lights coming
Speaker 1: down orbs in the sky, planes falling all the time,
Speaker 1: whenever you go look at like the last year's plane
Speaker 1: crashes in January, we had surpassed the amount of plane
Speaker 1: crashes from the previous year by January. That doesn't even
Speaker 1: make sense. So what I'm saying is I had had
Speaker 1: that thought and I never really went anywhere with it.
Speaker 1: But he brought this up, and I'm like, hmm, maybe
Speaker 1: you got something there. Because when we talk about the
Speaker 1: bunkers and we talk about the underground civilizations, right, and
Speaker 1: the idea of like this breakaway civilization and they know
Speaker 1: that we're in a solar mac maybe they know that
Speaker 1: there could be another Carrington event coming, a massive solar flare,
Speaker 1: a global blackout, which I've been seeing people talk more
Speaker 1: and more about that, which worries me because when I
Speaker 1: see people talking about a thing, sometimes it happens like
Speaker 1: a little bit after, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean all of this is.
Speaker 1: True.
Speaker 2: Uh, that's what Carrington level event. If it occurred now, GPS, radio, satellite,
Speaker 2: power grid, aviation, pipeline, internet, all would be affected.
Speaker 1: So what are the odds? So Okay, how many solar
Speaker 1: maximums have we been in since eighteen eighty five whenever
Speaker 1: that Carrington event happened? Because my question is this, how
Speaker 1: many solar maximums have we had that things were fine
Speaker 1: or minimum? You know what I mean? Where Like you
Speaker 1: just have a little issues like say, technically, what's going
Speaker 1: on right now is minimum right compared to what it
Speaker 1: could be. So I'm saying like, maybe this is all
Speaker 1: we have to worry about, and maybe this is usually
Speaker 1: all we have to worry about, But is it? I
Speaker 1: don't know.
Speaker 2: We've gone through fifteen solar maximums, including the current one
Speaker 2: solar cycle twenty five.
Speaker 1: So fifteen. All together, we went through fourteen just fine.
Speaker 1: Now when were the other ones? What dates were the
Speaker 1: other ones. That'd be a fun little game see if
Speaker 1: we had any crazy events happened during the other ones.
Speaker 2: So right before the first one, that was the Carrington
Speaker 2: event in eighteen fifty nine sou eighteen sixty, the next
Speaker 2: one is eighteen seventy, eighteen eighty three, eighteen ninety three,
Speaker 2: nineteen oh six, nineteen seventeen, nineteen twenty eight, nineteen thirty seven.
Speaker 2: So it happens pretty often, though it seems about like
Speaker 2: every ten years. But it just matches the Sun's rotation
Speaker 2: the solar cycles.
Speaker 1: Right, so it's yeah, that's what that was My next thought.
Speaker 1: I was like, Okay, but this probably happens pretty often,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, so yeah, all right.
Speaker 1: So yeah.
Speaker 2: A solar maximum is the peak of the Sun's eleven
Speaker 2: year solar cycle, when the sun spot numbers and solar
Speaker 2: activities are at their highest, so like flares and coronal
Speaker 2: mass ejections, which I actually saw a video on X
Speaker 2: the other day of a solar flare being released off
Speaker 2: of the Sun. It looked fucking wicked, dude. It doesn't
Speaker 2: even look real.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I've seen some of those. It's crazy. Well, the
Speaker 1: solar cycle nineteen and nineteen fifty seven and nineteen fifty
Speaker 1: eight would be the most recent one that caused the
Speaker 1: strongest in modern record, which all it caused was minor
Speaker 1: power and communications issues. And so we're a lot more
Speaker 1: dependent on satellite's GPS electrical grids now. So I understand
Speaker 1: that Carrington level event today would cause widespread blackouts, damage
Speaker 1: to transformers, communication failure, satellite malfunctions, all that good stuff.
Speaker 1: But it's not gonna end the world, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean? Like, I just don't see that being the
Speaker 1: end all be all. I mean, maybe how long are
Speaker 1: we talking blackouts for it? You know what I mean?
Speaker 1: All right, you got to rebuild the whole power plant,
Speaker 1: I mean not probably gotta like rewire everything.
Speaker 2: Though, I imagine, yeah, because I think it's so hot
Speaker 2: and then.
Speaker 1: Everything it singed. Just that would be crazy, Now, wouldn't
Speaker 1: that be a hell of a way to move into
Speaker 1: a new energy style of like operating, Like you know what,
Speaker 1: We're ready to get rid of these damn fucking wires
Speaker 1: out of the sky anyway, because we have this technology
Speaker 1: we can use and I'm thinking, you know, since we
Speaker 1: know that Carrington level events can happen and cause these
Speaker 1: kind of issues trillions of dollars with the damage, doesn't
Speaker 1: it make more sense to spend the trillions of dollars
Speaker 1: now to get a better energy grid that is not
Speaker 1: based in I don't know. Things could be affected by solar.
Speaker 2: Flares, almost like the LA fires.
Speaker 1: I mean, of course everything could be affected by solar
Speaker 1: flares somehow, but like, yeah, I don't know, what do
Speaker 1: you mean by the LA fires?
Speaker 2: Just same kind of scenario, you know, right, get water
Speaker 2: here before we have fires, not after we have a
Speaker 2: fire that decimates the city.
Speaker 1: What a fucking thought. Let's get water here before the fires.
Speaker 1: I got another one. How about let's turn the fucking
Speaker 1: tornado sirens on whenever there's one coming.
Speaker 2: Yeah, dude, dude, Like that's crazy in all seriousness, and
Speaker 2: and uh, in the Saint Louis area, like it got
Speaker 2: hit pretty hard along this along its trail that storm
Speaker 2: last Friday. A lot of people died, people lost their homes.
Speaker 1: No sirens. Now, I've seen a lot of people being like, oh,
Speaker 1: they did this, you know, on purpose. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: the biggest land grab in history or whatever. I don't
Speaker 1: know about that. I think the biggest land grab in
Speaker 1: history would be probably happening in the Palisades right now. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean or you know Hawaii where Yeah, when Hawaii.
Speaker 1: But it does. It is weird that those fires did
Speaker 1: line up exactly with the high speed rail system that
Speaker 1: they're trying to build for the smart Cities. I don't
Speaker 1: know there's some credence to that. Yeah, I'm like, maybe
Speaker 1: there's something there, because the same thing happened in a
Speaker 1: different country. I can't remember the country right now, but
Speaker 1: exactly where they were planning on putting a I Speed
Speaker 1: real race station I Speed railway track, they had a
Speaker 1: fire go up like the whole country right there. I'm like,
Speaker 1: what's up with that? You know, It's like are they
Speaker 1: using lasers?
Speaker 2: They're like, oh damn, this place is burned. There's nothing left.
Speaker 2: I know.
Speaker 1: It's like their favorite things station, your favorite thing to
Speaker 1: do is like clearly do things. See Like the best
Speaker 1: cover is just to be like, we don't have that technology. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but then at the same time we know they have
Speaker 1: that technology. Like if you actually look it up, you'll
Speaker 1: find that they admit they have the technology to affect
Speaker 1: the clouds to spray the sky and deflect the sun
Speaker 1: and all kinds of shit lasers. I mean, you're telling
Speaker 1: me they couldn't do that, like on a mass scale
Speaker 1: and on a satellite up in the air and pointed
Speaker 1: at a specific area and just blast.
Speaker 2: It like the fucking hammer of Dawn from years of war.
Speaker 1: Yeah, dude, like they got a real life that star
Speaker 1: like they it's a little one. They just pointed at
Speaker 1: a city, you know.
Speaker 2: Want you're shooting. The little flame starts and then just erupts.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The weird one is, uh you saw Okay, So
Speaker 1: I don't know if this is true. Actually I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure it's not true, but I do like to talk
Speaker 1: about because it's fun. So they're saying, how like the lasers,
Speaker 1: the blue roofs didn't catch fire, So houses with blue
Speaker 1: roofs didn't catch fire. And they're saying it's because like
Speaker 1: lasers can't like penetrate the color blue, which may be real.
Speaker 1: I don't know, Like I don't know how laser technology
Speaker 1: works like that, it's plausible. Maybe it would add credence
Speaker 1: to the idea they was done by a laser, for sure,
Speaker 1: and the idea that like trees would be like totally
Speaker 1: fine right here. Then right here they're just obliterated and
Speaker 1: a car's melted. It's like, okay, the residual heat from
Speaker 1: that should have at least did something to that tree. Yeah,
Speaker 1: see what I mean. So it's like things like that.
Speaker 1: It's like, Okay, something's going on. But I don't know.
Speaker 1: You can't just for sure say it's a laser, it's
Speaker 1: this or that, you know.
Speaker 2: No, I mean, I don't know if they ever really
Speaker 2: found the origin of all the fires.
Speaker 1: Did they Well, a lot of it they said was arsonists,
Speaker 1: which you could just pay somebody to go fucking say
Speaker 1: something on fire.
Speaker 2: I mean, shit, what we just talked about, we're in
Speaker 2: a solar maximum at the moment.
Speaker 1: Right, and well that didn't cause the fires. Well, if
Speaker 1: it's super hot, that'd be crazy. And if they were
Speaker 1: just like a whole thing of plasma hits the earth,
Speaker 1: then they don't even tell us and they're like, well,
Speaker 1: I don't know how these fires got.
Speaker 2: Oh no, not necessarily like anything like that. I don't
Speaker 2: think anything about the sky like any plasma or nothing
Speaker 2: like that.
Speaker 1: But I think I think that could happen.
Speaker 2: No, dude, I mean maybe we're not. This isn't the
Speaker 2: covenant for me.
Speaker 1: We're not getting glassed, dude, Bama coming from the sky.
Speaker 2: Oh shit, Alama Care, dude, dude, go back Obama Care. Dude.
Speaker 1: We need to all get back to that man. That
Speaker 1: was the I'm come on man. That man gave universal
Speaker 1: health care to everybody. Sure, you can't get surgeries if
Speaker 1: you have cancer, but damn it, you have health insurance.
Speaker 1: It's free. What are you mentioning about, dude.
Speaker 2: Obamacare was handed out left and right.
Speaker 1: Dude. That is the biggest scam. The biggest scam since
Speaker 1: then was whenever Joe Biden was like, we beat Big
Speaker 1: Pharma and they like negotiated the price on one drug,
Speaker 1: like ten dollars cheaper. We beat Big Pharma's right.
Speaker 2: We got a long negotiation, but we got them.
Speaker 1: We talked for two days and I got to drop
Speaker 1: this one drug that nobody takes down for ten dollars.
Speaker 2: Was like two people in the crowd. I was like, woo, yeah,
Speaker 2: they got like some everyone else was like what the fuck.
Speaker 1: I'm rare disease, like you know, yeah, But dude, And
Speaker 1: that's another thing. Trump actually did get a big win
Speaker 1: because he did get okay, So we're the only country
Speaker 1: that cannot negotiate our pharmaceutical prices. Did you know that?
Speaker 1: So every other country can negotiate their prices lower, right,
Speaker 1: America cannot And so in some cases we're paying like
Speaker 1: three hundred percent more than other countries. I mean, I
Speaker 1: just really pulled that number out of my ass. But
Speaker 1: it's a large number, and so Trump got it to
Speaker 1: drop like sixty percent on some drugs, like whenever you
Speaker 1: look at it, and you know, some of it's like
Speaker 1: one hundred and sixty if you really look at it,
Speaker 1: because that's how much we're getting fucked. And dude, I
Speaker 1: swear to god. The reporter after he announces all this,
Speaker 1: the reporter goes, so is it true that you're accepting
Speaker 1: a plane from Qatar? I'm like, dude, this guy literally
Speaker 1: actually beat big Pharma. I mean kind of, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean, Like as good as you're gonna get,
Speaker 1: and you're the first thing you do is like I
Speaker 1: want to make you look bad and let me get it.
Speaker 1: Gotcha in and then he do The best thing though,
Speaker 1: was his response to this. I almost want to put
Speaker 1: the clip in because it was so fucking funny. I
Speaker 1: don't want to butcher it, but I'm gonna try not to.
Speaker 1: He literally goes, he goes, have you ever heard of
Speaker 1: some golfer's name? He's like, the famous golfer? You ever
Speaker 1: heard of him? Well, first he was like, oh, you're
Speaker 1: ABC fake news, aren't you. He just wanted six million,
Speaker 1: sixteen million dollars like case from them. They had to
Speaker 1: pay him for defamation. So he's like, you must be
Speaker 1: ABC News. Didn't I just you know? He's like, didn't
Speaker 1: I just deal with you? And uh? Anyway, so he's like,
Speaker 1: there's a famous golfer and you may have heard of him.
Speaker 1: He's like, if you haven't heard of it, look him
Speaker 1: up for whatever. He's like, the golfer said. The guy says,
Speaker 1: pretty much, if somebody offers you to not put your
Speaker 1: last putt, just pick up your balls, say thank you,
Speaker 1: walk away. He's like, if somebody offers your putt, just
Speaker 1: say thank you, pick up the ball and golf. He's like,
Speaker 1: he's like, you don't you don't put because you know
Speaker 1: what happens. You take the putt and then you miss.
Speaker 1: I'm like, dude, this guy just gave her a fucking
Speaker 1: classic billionaire golfer analogy for like a life lesson w
Speaker 1: I want to hear out the other with her because
Speaker 1: she's like, not even She's still trying to figure out
Speaker 1: how she can get him.
Speaker 3: She's like, where you're laying, you gotta play no right,
Speaker 3: what about the plane? It's like, yeah, I didn't put right.
Speaker 3: I got the plane, but I took the ball and
Speaker 3: walked away. Yes, what are you not understanding? That's exactly
Speaker 3: how it went.
Speaker 1: It was so awesome because what I criticize everybody where
Speaker 1: criticism is due. But at the same time, it would
Speaker 1: be wrong of me to be like, well and they
Speaker 1: can do no right now because of that. No, I
Speaker 1: mean it really is trying with that. I mean, the
Speaker 1: guy's probably trying with everything. But Jesus, imagine yourself trying
Speaker 1: to be in that position and you have all these
Speaker 1: power hungry, greedy, corporate lobbyist people just everywhere. They all
Speaker 1: just want to They all want to get in your
Speaker 1: head and tell you how to do this or that,
Speaker 1: and they all want to tell you what, oh what
Speaker 1: more people really agree with this or or actually you know,
Speaker 1: they wouldn't like it too much of you did that
Speaker 1: and you would lose this much money for it. Imagine
Speaker 1: all that, dude, and then you try to sit there
Speaker 1: and criticize somebody like, Yeah, you got to give their
Speaker 1: kudos where it's due, because that is the hardest shit.
Speaker 1: It's not the hardest job because of the job itself.
Speaker 1: It's the hardest job because you have more snakes around
Speaker 1: you than a fucking fear factor pit. You know what
Speaker 1: I'm saying, Like you, you literally have more bullshit going
Speaker 1: on then you can shake his stick at. So, I mean,
Speaker 1: any win is a good win, but the losses were
Speaker 1: getting are pretty fucking huge. So I mean you gotta
Speaker 1: call that out too. I mean, we get a war
Speaker 1: with that Ran, and then I'll just take away everything
Speaker 1: I just said about the dude, because that would make
Speaker 1: up for it all.
Speaker 2: Yeah, fuck that.
Speaker 1: We ain't winning a war with Iran.
Speaker 2: They're taking candy though, they're taking their candy.
Speaker 1: But yeah, so, uh yeah, we're a little bit all
Speaker 1: over the place. What do we talk about. We talked
Speaker 1: about a little bit of a little bit of Diddy,
Speaker 1: a little bit of Epstein. Uh take what I said
Speaker 1: back about tem Ryan, not that I said anything to
Speaker 1: detrimental or famatory. I literally just pointed out where he
Speaker 1: pointed out that, yeah, there's people that probably have gone
Speaker 1: on his podcast and they have tried to put in
Speaker 1: at least a line of a certain narrative, and hey,
Speaker 1: he admits it. He looks at it, and it seems
Speaker 1: like a not that this really matters, but like a
Speaker 1: good Christian guy. So if by that I mean like,
Speaker 1: seems to be a guy who actually follows like the
Speaker 1: words of Christ, but not like, oh God is you
Speaker 1: know in hell and this and that. That's not what
Speaker 1: I mean. But he seems to actually be a decent
Speaker 1: du that really just tries to be objective, put the
Speaker 1: truth out there, empathetic whatever. So you know, I had
Speaker 1: to take that back. I felt bad, and I don't
Speaker 1: want anybody think that I'm just like a Bill Cooper nutcase,
Speaker 1: because one, yes, he's a nutjob and a Christian guy
Speaker 1: who look at things through Christian values. So there's definitely that.
Speaker 1: But if you were a person who knows how to
Speaker 1: listen to somebody without taking in all the information and
Speaker 1: then letting it change how you think fully, then there
Speaker 1: should be no problem because yeah, I can listen to
Speaker 1: somebody that I disagree with, like a manly p hall person, right,
Speaker 1: And then still take in all this philosophic knowledge that
Speaker 1: one has to offer while also understanding that there's manipulation
Speaker 1: going on in those words, and then understanding where to
Speaker 1: kind of detach myself from like opinions, you know, and
Speaker 1: not let myself be malleable or pretty much don't be
Speaker 1: a child, you know, a child like whenever you tell
Speaker 1: them a thing, they take it as gospel, and then
Speaker 1: somebody else tells him a thing, they take that as gospel,
Speaker 1: and it just goes on and on and they never
Speaker 1: actually think about it. Yeah, just don't do that. And
Speaker 1: I don't know, like listening to Bill Cooper isn't a
Speaker 1: bad thing because he had a lot right, but yeah,
Speaker 1: if you go listen to the Sun God what somebody
Speaker 1: had pointed out to me, this is why I brought
Speaker 1: this up. They were like, well, somebody debunked what Bill
Speaker 1: Cooper was saying because they took one episode of his
Speaker 1: Mystery Babylon where he said that the son of Man
Speaker 1: really means the son or the son of God really
Speaker 1: means the son of God Sun, and that's what they meant.
Speaker 1: They took that one thing and ran with it, and
Speaker 1: it's like okay, but there's so much more. First of all,
Speaker 1: he doesn't even believe in astro theology. He was a
Speaker 1: Christian guy, but he was pointing out astro theology and
Speaker 1: how it's Luciferian and how it's in the Bible because
Speaker 1: they put it there, and he was trying to point
Speaker 1: this out, and because he was wrong on certain words
Speaker 1: and how it was actually translated in the Bible, they're
Speaker 1: just attacked him. But it's like, okay, but the underlying
Speaker 1: truth of what he's saying is still true. That they're
Speaker 1: trying to involve all religions under one kind of philosophy
Speaker 1: and just totally eject like truth and whatever. And so
Speaker 1: I don't know, I just think that, Yeah, the guy's
Speaker 1: like worth listening to. But anyway, I don't know. Done
Speaker 1: harping on that. We uh, yeah, we got a lot
Speaker 1: more listeners hopping on here. I really appreciate it. Really
Speaker 1: gives us a lot of motivation. We're excited.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: I put a poll on the last clip. I don't
Speaker 1: think anybody saw it. I don't know how these polls
Speaker 1: even pop up for you as a listener, but and
Speaker 1: I'm putting this at the end of the episode, so
Speaker 1: nobody's probably gonna do it, but I put a pole
Speaker 1: just I have three more clips that I could put out,
Speaker 1: and I was like gonna put about in a certain
Speaker 1: order because I wasn't like in a hurry, and I
Speaker 1: figured I could put like one out a week whenever,
Speaker 1: a couple weeks whatever. So there's a poll on there
Speaker 1: for which one I put out next. Definitely would like
Speaker 1: your feedback. We got Bretty Murphy, mk ultramon talk or
Speaker 1: Harley Pasternak and his crazy ties with the celebrities and
Speaker 1: mk Ultra.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and in the comments, let us know if you
Speaker 2: think they're turning the friggin frogs.
Speaker 1: Gay frogs are gay. It's too late now. I do appreciate, though,
Speaker 1: the people who have commented and said the nice sports
Speaker 1: that they've said. Man, yeah, we're just starting out, so
Speaker 1: we really appreciate that. We're kind of it's going nice
Speaker 1: and steady. We're actually excited. We're fucking trying to get
Speaker 1: some cameras up. We might get real space setups. That way.
Speaker 1: It looks aesthetically leasing for everybody and kind of really
Speaker 1: catches our vibes. So we don't want to pull the
Speaker 1: trigger on that. So we really got our kind of
Speaker 1: our shit aesthetically figured.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and then once we get cameras in here, we
Speaker 2: get the video going for Spotify, then we could start
Speaker 2: putting videos up on YouTube and stuff like that, so
Speaker 2: there's more outlets for you guys to listen and watch.
Speaker 1: Yeah, still feel weird about the YouTube. You know, Uh,
Speaker 1: we're gonna do it, but I'm almost guaranteed that. I mean,
Speaker 1: what we cussed like in the first five minutes of
Speaker 1: every episode, so we'll.
Speaker 2: Probably get but it's the thought that counts.
Speaker 1: It's not all about monetization, but it's also like, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're not gonna get any whatever it's worth it, we'll
Speaker 1: do it. It is what it is. But yeah, we're
Speaker 1: we're mad excited. Next weekend, this weekend whatever, this next
Speaker 1: episode should be getting into some wild shit. I forgot
Speaker 1: what it was. What was it about? Oh, did you
Speaker 1: know there's eight presidents before Washington.
Speaker 2: That's news to me.
Speaker 1: They weren't technically presidents like under the Constitution of the
Speaker 1: United States, but there was eight serving presidents in the
Speaker 1: congressional whatever that served before Washington. So he was not
Speaker 1: the first technically. I mean, he was the first president,
Speaker 1: but not the first.
Speaker 2: He was the first president on paper.
Speaker 1: Heah, he wasn't like the first guy running shit, So
Speaker 1: that was kind of crazy, you know.
Speaker 2: I actually about that the other day. Who was in
Speaker 2: charge before, like George Washington took the mantle?
Speaker 1: Yeah, right for for president exactly. Yeah. So next week,
Speaker 1: I think, you know, coming off of that accelerationism from
Speaker 1: last week and all that fun stuff, we're definitely probably
Speaker 1: gonna get into a little bit more of Well, there's
Speaker 1: something called the CCRU, which is cybernetics whatever. We'll get
Speaker 1: into it next week. I think that it's definitely worth
Speaker 1: looking at, and we'll get into kind of like the
Speaker 1: idea of the occult within this tech billionaire class that
Speaker 1: we keep talking about. I do want to bring up
Speaker 1: the fact that yeah, it's spiritual for them too, dark spirituality,
Speaker 1: dark occult shit, but it's worth kind of looking at.
Speaker 1: If you've ever heard of HP Lovecraft, go ahead and
Speaker 1: do some homework for the next show, because we'll be
Speaker 1: getting into some of that shit. Yeah, there's been another
Speaker 1: sixty agenda. I appreciate y' all. You have a good one.
Speaker 1: See you next time. Putt putt, putt, putt putting. The
Speaker 1: text Putt putt,