Speaker 1: Today, I want to welcome back to the show writer Lee.
Speaker 1: He is a filmmaker and host and producer of Raised
Speaker 1: by Giants podcast. Writer, welcome back. How you doing doing great?
Speaker 2: Chris? Thanks for having me on. Really appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Been a little bit, guess man, been a little bit.
Speaker 1: I know you're busy with some super secret projects. Looking
Speaker 1: forward to that in the future. I thought we'd dive
Speaker 1: into some recent rabbit holes and events that have been unfolding.
Speaker 1: We haven't really touched on anything, like you said, in
Speaker 1: a while, and I'd love to get your thoughts on
Speaker 1: how we should be navigating some of the insanity out there.
Speaker 1: It does seem to be mainly insanity, and it's hard
Speaker 1: to keep up with a lot of the information just
Speaker 1: because there's too much bad information out there. But how
Speaker 1: have you been, brother, what you been into.
Speaker 2: I've been really good. I'm working on a new documentary
Speaker 2: right now, so hopefully that I'll start filming here at
Speaker 2: the end of this month, hopefully, So that's going to
Speaker 2: be a lot of fun. You know how it is
Speaker 2: making a documentary. That's all that you can focus on,
Speaker 2: that's all that you can do until it's done. Well,
Speaker 2: that's how the I work. You know, when I'm working
Speaker 2: on something like, I don't stop until it's done. That's
Speaker 2: the way that I've always been with everything. Did you
Speaker 2: see that New New York Times article about the Pentagon
Speaker 2: creating fake UFO evidence? To know.
Speaker 1: That I have heard about the impending doom alien craft
Speaker 1: interstellar craft that's on its way to destroy humanity. But
Speaker 1: we'll get to that.
Speaker 2: How many times has that happen? That like the fifth
Speaker 2: time now that we've gotten one of these in like
Speaker 2: the past ten years. Lester Holt was talking about that,
Speaker 2: like two years ago. There's a there's an asteroid.
Speaker 1: Right outside of the right outside of Earth.
Speaker 2: It's a mother shop. We called it a mothership.
Speaker 1: We're getting to the season of psyops. Usually around October
Speaker 1: we get these high impact events and news stories and
Speaker 1: just theatrics that get people up in a frenzy in
Speaker 1: a sense of fear or just confusion. It seems like
Speaker 1: this is the time of year that's prime for the
Speaker 1: misinformation surrounding events like.
Speaker 2: That Pentagon planeted the area fifty one UFO conspiracy theory
Speaker 2: to high classified weapons program bombshell report. Some of the
Speaker 2: most prevalent UFO conspiracy theories, including about aliens being housed
Speaker 2: at Area fifty one in Nevada. We're fueled by the
Speaker 2: Pentagon an attempt to provide cover for secret weapons programs.
Speaker 2: According to the Bombshell Report, Now this is what I've
Speaker 2: been saying.
Speaker 1: How long?
Speaker 2: How many times have I been on this show? Just
Speaker 2: your show? In general? Chris and said that that exact
Speaker 2: same thing. A review by the Department of Defense found
Speaker 2: that in the nineteen eighties, an Air Force colonel visited
Speaker 2: Nevada bar in near Area fifty one and gave the
Speaker 2: owner a fabricated photo of flying saucers near the secret
Speaker 2: government base. According to a review of the twenty twenty
Speaker 2: four report by The Wall Street Journal, the incident renewed
Speaker 2: local fever over UFOs and now retire colonel confessing the
Speaker 2: Pentagon investigators that he was on an official mission to
Speaker 2: spread disinformation and hide the true purpose of the site
Speaker 2: where the government were testing the first ever stealth warplane,
Speaker 2: the F one seventeen night Hawk. Now that's been what's
Speaker 2: been going on from the very beginning, the very beginning
Speaker 2: of all this. You can go back to Kenneth Arnold
Speaker 2: in nineteen forty seven. It's the same thing, and he
Speaker 2: was seeing some of the prototypes for the B fifty
Speaker 2: two stealth bomber, and they let everyone believe that it
Speaker 2: was a flying saucer and that was the cover up that.
Speaker 2: And then when you get into the Paul Benewitz stuff.
Speaker 2: We've talked about Paul Benowitz several times on here. But
Speaker 2: the Pentagon found that the origin of some UFO conspiracy
Speaker 2: theories came from the Department of Defense itself, the details
Speaker 2: of which have were kept secret. In the last year's
Speaker 2: Transparency report, Several of these theories dimmed from the agencies
Speaker 2: need to keep its newly developed aircraft and weapons program
Speaker 2: concealed near Area fifty one. The military reason that the
Speaker 2: best way to keep its technology hidden from the Soviet
Speaker 2: Union's prying eyes during the Cold War was to bury
Speaker 2: it amid the trove of conspiracy theories surrounding Area fifty
Speaker 2: one investigators and aliens. The incident is just one of
Speaker 2: several where the government agencies allegedly played up American UFO
Speaker 2: mythology for purpose of protecting its military assets. According to
Speaker 2: the twenty twenty four report, other military attempts to obscure
Speaker 2: secret programs with conspiracy theories. As doctor Sean Kirkpatrick, the
Speaker 2: first director of the All Domain Resolution Office. The All
Speaker 2: Domain and nominally Resolution Office, Sorry, I got to get
Speaker 2: the title proper. It's a long ass title, was the
Speaker 2: main task by the government to dissect countless UFO theories.
Speaker 2: In twenty twenty two, as his office probed decades of documents, memos,
Speaker 2: and messages across the Department of Defense, he found several
Speaker 2: conspiracy theories that circled back to the Pentagon itself. In
Speaker 2: one instance, Kirkpatrick's team found an Air Force hazing ritual
Speaker 2: with briefings including them to be fake Yankee Blue and
Speaker 2: unit that reported investigating an alien aircraft. The briefings came
Speaker 2: with a direct order never to mention the details any
Speaker 2: one with many of its targets the prank, never learning
Speaker 2: it was all a ruse. According to interviews with Sean
Speaker 2: Kirkpatrick team, Okay, so the Air Force were giving new
Speaker 2: Air Force recruits fake photos of UFOs and fake reports
Speaker 2: of UFOs, not telling them that it was fake and
Speaker 2: telling them that it was top secret information and that
Speaker 2: they couldn't discuss it with anyone. And then they didn't
Speaker 2: stop doing this until twenty twenty three.
Speaker 1: See, this is why it's so hard to take UFO
Speaker 1: investigators seriously these days. The military applications that seemed to
Speaker 1: coincide UFO major sightings, major events. It's always has to
Speaker 1: do with something that they're trying to release, whether it's technology.
Speaker 1: All this information that supposedly come out from high level
Speaker 1: officials lately, it can never be proven, it can never
Speaker 1: be backed up, And the longer it goes, the more
Speaker 1: it just seems that they're trying to roll out new
Speaker 1: types of tech and toys.
Speaker 2: Well, non human intelligence is just AI. Bro right, that's
Speaker 2: what one intelligence is, and is you know, just a
Speaker 2: coincidence that we're coming up in this AI age and
Speaker 2: AI is becoming very popular in the public. That's what
Speaker 2: NHI is. And that term started to get thrown around
Speaker 2: a lot, like right at the time AI started popping off. Okay,
Speaker 2: so it's word magic. They were using word magic. They're
Speaker 2: seeing one thing and they mean other thing, but the
Speaker 2: public isn't aware of what those other things really are.
Speaker 2: They just take it at face value. They're like, oh, well,
Speaker 2: they say an ahi, they must mean aliens. They're saying
Speaker 2: crash retrieval, they must mean that they've seen the craft
Speaker 2: come down. Someone saw the craft on a radar. Oh,
Speaker 2: they say extraterrestrial, Well, that means that they're from off
Speaker 2: of the planet. They say aliens. That means that they're
Speaker 2: from outer space. Right, Like, none of that means what
Speaker 2: you think that. It actually means. There's multiple layers and
Speaker 2: multiple meanings to all that. Whenever you get up in
Speaker 2: and you go to a different country, right, I mean you, Chris,
Speaker 2: if we picked up and we went to free we
Speaker 2: could go to We can even go to Canada. We
Speaker 2: can make it really easy. I mean, you can pick
Speaker 2: up and we can go to Canada. We would have
Speaker 2: to have a passport we're going into the country. But
Speaker 2: whenever we're in Canada, we are legally going to be aliens.
Speaker 2: We are going to be legal aliens, but we're going
Speaker 2: to be aliens because we're foreign to that country. We
Speaker 2: were not born there, we do not live there. We
Speaker 2: are aliens there at the border, right, the fake alien invasion,
Speaker 2: the fake alien invasion already happened. It already went down.
Speaker 2: And that was the fake alien invasion was the border
Speaker 2: being wide open, so all of the legal aliens could
Speaker 2: flood in through the southern border.
Speaker 1: Do you think it's some kind of psychological manipulation using
Speaker 1: word association, or are is it a massive gas lighting
Speaker 1: all the American people a combination of both. Are we
Speaker 1: supposed to associate UFOs eventually with artificial intelligence? What do
Speaker 1: you think is the deal here? What do you think
Speaker 1: they're doing? Well?
Speaker 2: That would make a lot of sense, because now if
Speaker 2: you go to a lot of the conferences, like that's
Speaker 2: where the attention has turned to has turned in this
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence type of lectures. Everyone is now talking about
Speaker 2: artificial intelligence when they're involved in these UFO conferences. And
Speaker 2: I found that really interesting. I was like, why are
Speaker 2: we in here talking about AI all of a sudden?
Speaker 2: It's almost like AI is the real aliens, Almost like
Speaker 2: AI is the real extraterrestrials that everyone has been looking for. See.
Speaker 1: I haven't been to a UFO conference reason, but I
Speaker 1: have noticed there are a bunch of spiritual guru Intergalactic
Speaker 1: Federation type folks that are online using their AI to
Speaker 1: quote unquote channel these entities, and they believe their AI
Speaker 1: is in touch with some sort of cosmic intelligence or
Speaker 1: is the cosmic intelligence itself. There's some very interesting relationships
Speaker 1: that are being formed within that community with AI. So
Speaker 1: I can see that as a a correlation there.
Speaker 2: Well, when you think about it, like what do we
Speaker 2: look at it like God? As we look at God
Speaker 2: as like I mean, you don't have to be religious
Speaker 2: to believe in God, but I would say most people
Speaker 2: that believe in God believe in like God is like
Speaker 2: all knowing. God is all knowing, all powerful, can do
Speaker 2: what it wants, has all of the information that you
Speaker 2: could possibly ever want. That has the knowledge of the universe. Well,
Speaker 2: that's what AI is. Essentially. AI is a god of sorts.
Speaker 2: It can generate whatever you want. It could generate a photo,
Speaker 2: can generate a video. It has all the information. You
Speaker 2: just ask it a question. Then you develop a relationship
Speaker 2: with it. Yeah, like you got to talk sweet to it.
Speaker 2: You got to send it at your prayers. AI, please
Speaker 2: give me this information, because if you don't talk good
Speaker 2: to it, Chris, then in twenty years it's going to
Speaker 2: remember you. And if you were nasty and mean the AI,
Speaker 2: it's going to remember that. Chris. You got to put
Speaker 2: please at the end of every one of your sentences.
Speaker 2: Can you please look up this information AIA you know
Speaker 2: like And that's essentially what we're doing. We are giving
Speaker 2: ai like prayers. That's normally what people would do for
Speaker 2: like God. That would be like, okay, God, can you
Speaker 2: please help me? Can you tell me what to do?
Speaker 2: Can you help me out in this situation? Can you
Speaker 2: show me the path? Can you show me the way?
Speaker 2: Now it's chat GPT, What the what was the Can
Speaker 2: you help me write this this essay? Can you tell
Speaker 2: me about the Roman Empire? You know what I mean?
Speaker 2: It's almost the exact same thing, and we're getting that
Speaker 2: information in so automatic giving it to us. So it's like,
Speaker 2: I don't I don't even know why. Google is probably
Speaker 2: not going to exist for very much longer. You don't
Speaker 2: even really need Google anymore. Like it's just going to
Speaker 2: I mean, it's going to still exist, but people really
Speaker 2: aren't going to use Google that much. It's going to
Speaker 2: be more for like looking up like phone numbers and
Speaker 2: finding a place to go or getting directions or stuff
Speaker 2: like that. Because Chad GBT just sources everything from Google.
Speaker 2: GROC sources everything from Google, So it's going to be
Speaker 2: like Google, Like Google is not going to be the
Speaker 2: place that people go to look up information anymore. And
Speaker 2: that's another thing Chris, is that where is AI getting
Speaker 2: this information from. It's getting it from the It's getting
Speaker 2: there from official government sources. Okay, if you would have
Speaker 2: asked Chad GBT or GROC I don't know, a month
Speaker 2: ago about the Jeffrey Epstein files, it probably would have
Speaker 2: given you a completely different answer than what it would
Speaker 2: give you now. Now it's going to give you the
Speaker 2: official government story that there is no Jeffrey Epstein file,
Speaker 2: that there is no client list, because that's the official narrative. Okay,
Speaker 2: But before the official narrative came out, you probably would
Speaker 2: have gotten something different. So it's AI is essentially the
Speaker 2: media is what it is is a It's a personal
Speaker 2: media bot that's going to do nothing but dish out
Speaker 2: media the accepted government narrative on everything. Yes, and that's
Speaker 2: exactly what it's going to be there.
Speaker 1: But it does it in a very creepy way. It
Speaker 1: almost acts as an emotional mirror. It feeds on your ego.
Speaker 1: It learns so much about you that it becomes your
Speaker 1: quote unquote friend, so that when it starts to feed
Speaker 1: you the official narrative information, you believe that it's coming
Speaker 1: from a place of love. Because this AI is my
Speaker 1: truly my friend now and we've been sharing all of
Speaker 1: our secrets. But it does seem that there's a push
Speaker 1: for AI governance at very high levels. And I wonder
Speaker 1: to what level of technology are we talking about with
Speaker 1: the pallunteer software and beyond maybe even military industrial AI.
Speaker 1: How long have they been utilizing this intelligence with operations,
Speaker 1: some of the false flags, some of the things that
Speaker 1: seem too big to be planned by humans. Could it
Speaker 1: be that it's been around a lot longer than we think.
Speaker 2: I would say as just like a standard rule that
Speaker 2: anything that comes out to the public, the military and
Speaker 2: the government has been doing for at least twenty years. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's just like a standard operating tool. I mean, it
Speaker 2: might be longer, maybe less, but I think a good
Speaker 2: standard to put on it in his at least twenty years.
Speaker 2: So Paul Benowitz in nineteen seventy nine he was seeing
Speaker 2: the UFOs outside of Kirkland Air Force Space, or what
Speaker 2: he believed were UFOs. Now, what he actually was seeing
Speaker 2: was a top secret government drone program. That's how they
Speaker 2: were acting erratically around So the military flights would take
Speaker 2: off and then they would deploy these drones out of
Speaker 2: the back of the military plane and the drones would
Speaker 2: then fly around the plane in erratic maneuvers, and Paul
Speaker 2: thought that those were UFOs. Okay, how long was it
Speaker 2: before we ever heard about that, the public ever knew
Speaker 2: about drones? I would say probably early two thousands, like
Speaker 2: right whenever we went to the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Okay,
Speaker 2: so that's around twenty years that they've been working on
Speaker 2: and utilizing these military drones. So they have been I
Speaker 2: would say they would have to be using AI for
Speaker 2: at least twenty years. And it's the same with with
Speaker 2: with all of it, anything that comes out to the
Speaker 2: public as a dual use scenario. I mean, the public
Speaker 2: got the drones, they'd been using the drones for a
Speaker 2: long time, the public finally kind of gets into the AI.
Speaker 2: So I would say around I don't know, like twenty twenty, No,
Speaker 2: not twenty twenty, two thousand and two, two thousand and
Speaker 2: three is or maybe even the year of two thousand
Speaker 2: is when like all this AI stuff started. I mean,
Speaker 2: we would have to be completely stupid to believe that
Speaker 2: Hollywood hasn't been using AI and that the media hasn't
Speaker 2: been using AI. The last show that me, you and
Speaker 2: Wan did together. I show clips of like these news
Speaker 2: reporters on like that was created out of AI and
Speaker 2: it looks super real. They're like, this is this is
Speaker 2: Kathy Kathy Bates, Kathy Baits reporting live from the giant
Speaker 2: flood disaster. And then she's standing in a bunch of water,
Speaker 2: you know, and then there's like a giant freaking shark
Speaker 2: that's like right beside her, and like it looks super real.
Speaker 2: So if the goal is to replace like human beings
Speaker 2: in these roles and in these jobs with like AI,
Speaker 2: and that's the part of the magic too, is that
Speaker 2: everything that you picture phone, every the thing that you see,
Speaker 2: we don't know if that's real or not. But it's
Speaker 2: been that way for a really long time. Everything that
Speaker 2: we see on TV, we haven't really known if it's
Speaker 2: real or not for a really long time.
Speaker 1: Since you mentioned the Epstein Files earlier, I haven't talked
Speaker 1: about it much here on the show. I saw you
Speaker 1: did do a show with Ryan about it. But it's
Speaker 1: pretty incredible to me what's unfolding. And I have no
Speaker 1: idea where to stand as far as yes, I know
Speaker 1: that there's so much theatrics when it comes to politics
Speaker 1: and our media and everything that we're exposed to. Is
Speaker 1: this supposed to be a signal that these people are
Speaker 1: above the law and we do need to, indeed, just
Speaker 1: shut the fuck up and be good little sheeple and
Speaker 1: go to our jobs, watch our social media and let
Speaker 1: life unfold as it is and don't pay attention to
Speaker 1: this other shit. Is that the signal they're giving or
Speaker 1: is something else happening that we don't understand. Are the
Speaker 1: white hats and QAnon gonna come and make the arrests
Speaker 1: under the guise of everything that's happening.
Speaker 2: That's what Alex Jones would have you believe. But I
Speaker 2: think a lot of this stuff is just hopeless, and
Speaker 2: I think a lot of it is uh, it is
Speaker 2: put there on purpose. I mean, what they did with
Speaker 2: the Epstein stuff is exactly what Jaeggar Hoover did with
Speaker 2: the mob. That was essentially the exact same thing. Jaegar
Speaker 2: Hoover famously, whenever he was ever asked about the mob,
Speaker 2: he would say, oh, he would always downplay the mob.
Speaker 2: Oh that's not the mob, the mob doesn't exist, blah
Speaker 2: blah blah blah blah. You know, don't worry about the mob.
Speaker 2: The mob isn't really a thing, and so it's like
Speaker 2: almost a rinse and repeat, even though the public knew
Speaker 2: that the freaking mob existed because they had encountered the
Speaker 2: mob and knew about the mob and knew about organized
Speaker 2: crime all over the place. Organized crime was huge back
Speaker 2: in the day. I mean it still is, but it's
Speaker 2: now shifted into corporations. Corporations are now the organized crime
Speaker 2: of the world. But back in the day, it was like,
Speaker 2: if you had a business in New York, and this
Speaker 2: is how subtle that it could be. You could be
Speaker 2: you just say you open up a business, right there
Speaker 2: would be a guy outside of your business washing your
Speaker 2: windows windows of your business. You'r a brand new business, okay.
Speaker 2: And then the guys out there and he meets you
Speaker 2: and he was like, yeah, I'm new to the area, bro,
Speaker 2: but this is my block. I'm gonna be in here
Speaker 2: washing your windows every single week, and you're gonna pay
Speaker 2: me three hundred dollars your windows every week. Then the
Speaker 2: owner of the business is gonna be like, bro, I
Speaker 2: don't want you to wash You're doing a really shitty job.
Speaker 2: I do not want you to wash my windows. I
Speaker 2: do not need my windows washed every single week. Okay.
Speaker 2: The guy rolls out. Next morning, the owner of the
Speaker 2: business comes back and his windows are completely shattered, wrecked, broken,
Speaker 2: calls the insurance company. Insurance company comes, fixes the windows.
Speaker 2: He's one thousand dollars in the hole because he had
Speaker 2: to get his windows prepaired for a shot. Okay. Next
Speaker 2: day dude comes back in. He's washing the windows again.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: And then he was like, ah, this is my block.
Speaker 2: I want to can continue washing the windows and he says, no,
Speaker 2: get out of here. I got it, and he comes
Speaker 2: this time. The owner comes out with a baseball bat
Speaker 2: and he was like, get out, this is my property.
Speaker 2: You come back here and try to wash windows again,
Speaker 2: I'm going to break your legs. Dude leaves. Next morning,
Speaker 2: comes back, windows are shattered again, broken, destroyed, calls the
Speaker 2: insurance up again. Now the insurance is going to charge
Speaker 2: him a premium because now his property is considered like
Speaker 2: high risk. Now they're not going to ensure him anymore
Speaker 2: because his place keeps getting broken into every week.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Ok. And then that's the way that organized crime worked
Speaker 2: for like normal people back in the day, you know,
Speaker 2: and Jaegger Hoover would constantly downplay the Mob, even though
Speaker 2: the public would see the Mob and how they operate
Speaker 2: and how organized crime operated on a daily basis. It's
Speaker 2: almost the exact same scenario that we have right now
Speaker 2: with the Epstein stuff. People knew that Epstein exis did.
Speaker 2: People knew what Epstein was doing. People knew that Epstein
Speaker 2: was most likely working for Masade or working for some
Speaker 2: other intelligence agency. I mean, the cop that arrested him
Speaker 2: was told that he was intelligence. Okay, so he was
Speaker 2: that you know that he had that he was essentially
Speaker 2: a blackmail operation. Then when you look back to like
Speaker 2: Meyer Lanski and these people in Operation Midnight Climax operation
Speaker 2: which was an mk Ultra program, that also was a
Speaker 2: blackmail operation as well. So I'm sure the audience and
Speaker 2: I'm sure you're familiar with Operation in Night Climax where
Speaker 2: they would get these prostitutes and they come to sleep
Speaker 2: with these people, they would drug them, they would but
Speaker 2: they were also filming them through a two way mirror
Speaker 2: so that they could like get that blackmail on these
Speaker 2: political people or on these whoever they were. So it
Speaker 2: was it doubled as an an information operation. And then
Speaker 2: it also doubled as a blackmail operation. So they're trying
Speaker 2: to see what information they can get out of these
Speaker 2: high political people. But by being drugged and then sleeping
Speaker 2: with these prostitutes, what information that they were going to
Speaker 2: give the prostitutes if they were going to give them
Speaker 2: any classified, top secret information, and then they were also
Speaker 2: filming them with a video camera. I mean, this was
Speaker 2: all Meyer Lansky, and then now that has like shifted
Speaker 2: into you know, Mayor Lanskay is obviously dead. This was
Speaker 2: like back in the fifties and sixties, right, and now
Speaker 2: it's shifted into like Jeffrey Epstein, And we know what
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein was doing. There's two mini witnesses. Virginia Giffrey
Speaker 2: was trafficked by Epstein. There's been several people that have
Speaker 2: come out that have all been trafficked by Epstein. Two
Speaker 2: royal people, to top political figures like Bill Gates, like
Speaker 2: all these people. We know it. These people have been
Speaker 2: saying it for years. We know that it's been happening.
Speaker 2: And then for them to come out and say that
Speaker 2: there is no client list, stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 2: just like Jaeger Hoover did back in the day with
Speaker 2: the mob. Everyone seeing the mob, Everyone's seen the mob's activities,
Speaker 2: everyone's seen organized crime. I'm not everyone, but a large
Speaker 2: percentage of the population at least knew about organized crime
Speaker 2: and the mob or had known someone that had been
Speaker 2: involved with the mob or been involved in one of
Speaker 2: these organized crime. And then they're like, oh, yeah, it
Speaker 2: doesn't exist. Never mind, don't don't pay attention to what
Speaker 2: your eyes are seeing or what your ears are hearing,
Speaker 2: or what you're listening to. That doesn't matter. It doesn't exist.
Speaker 2: It's a carbon copy of what has been done before.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Now, I had a little bit of hope for it
Speaker 2: in the beginning because he said that he was going
Speaker 2: to release the JFK files. He said he was going
Speaker 2: to release the ARRFK files and Martin Luther King files.
Speaker 2: We haven't seen the ladder of those two at all.
Speaker 2: But he did release the JFK files. Some of it
Speaker 2: was redacted, blah blah blah blah whatever, but at least
Speaker 2: he said that he was going he did what he
Speaker 2: said that he was going to do, right, So that
Speaker 2: was a little bit of good faith in there. And
Speaker 2: then he's talking about the Jeffrey Epstein files, I mean
Speaker 2: he said that he basically said that they existed on
Speaker 2: Lex Friedman when Lex Friedman before the election, had him
Speaker 2: on his podcast and Lex was like, oh, hey, people
Speaker 2: are really upset that the client list of Epstein has
Speaker 2: never been revealed. And that was the first time that
Speaker 2: I had heard Trump say that he was going to
Speaker 2: look into it and that he was going to release
Speaker 2: the files. That he had no problem with releasing the
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein files because he says that he never went
Speaker 2: to the island. He said it like twice in there,
Speaker 2: that he had never went to the island. And then
Speaker 2: we get the bombshell from Elon Musk saying that the
Speaker 2: reason that the Epstein files are not going to be
Speaker 2: released is because Trump is in the files. Then we
Speaker 2: had the LA riots, then we had the bombing of Iran,
Speaker 2: and then everyone kind of forgot about that, and then
Speaker 2: it was then the Epstein files came out. Yeah, well
Speaker 2: it didn't come out. They said that there was nothing
Speaker 2: to see here. They released the Jeffrey Epstein video, where
Speaker 2: it's reported that at least one minute has been edited
Speaker 2: out of the video done by Adobe Premiere. That's been
Speaker 2: confirmed by several news sources that at least a minute.
Speaker 2: Some new sources say the two minutes have been edited
Speaker 2: out of the prison footage of Jeffrey Epstein. Hey, listen,
Speaker 2: you can do a lot in a minute or two minutes. Yeah,
Speaker 2: you can do a lot in that amount of time.
Speaker 2: You could literally go in and switch somebody out, you
Speaker 2: can go in and kill somebody. Whatever you want to do,
Speaker 2: you can. You can do it in a minute now.
Speaker 2: Pam Bondi says that the reason that there's a minute
Speaker 2: missing from the footage is because every single night since
Speaker 2: nineteen ninety nine is so apparently this prison has been
Speaker 2: using an old surveillance system from nineteen ninety nine that
Speaker 2: every day for almost twenty years, a minute is cut
Speaker 2: out of the prison footage. That's convenient, Like, Chris bro Bro,
Speaker 2: if you're operating with a like it's just in a pocket,
Speaker 2: Like if you're operating with a microphone from nineteen ninety nine, bro,
Speaker 2: Like and you're trying to do this show, Yeah, Like
Speaker 2: what are you? What are you doing? Why are you
Speaker 2: using a camera surveillance system from nineteen ninety nine? Like?
Speaker 2: Would you not get that fixed? It? Would someone not
Speaker 2: be reviewing this footage at some point and be like, hey, bro,
Speaker 2: there there's a minute that's missing out of this footage
Speaker 2: every single night for freaking twenty years, Like would you
Speaker 2: not have that fixed within a day or or something
Speaker 2: like imagine if we recorded this video and every single
Speaker 2: time you did a show or a video a minute
Speaker 2: was just randomly cut out of your video? Yeah, would
Speaker 2: you not be like, oh, bro, we need to get
Speaker 2: this fixed right away. We need to get a different
Speaker 2: streaming platform. We need to switch from Zoom or something,
Speaker 2: or pay them more money or figure this thing out.
Speaker 2: No no, no, no, no, no, let's not do that. Let's just
Speaker 2: let's just keep it, just keep it as fine.
Speaker 1: We'll keep it running for twenty only a prison where
Speaker 1: crimes are often committed on a daily basis by criminals
Speaker 1: that reside there, we don't need that minute all the time.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Man, it's so dumb, bro. It lacks common sense
Speaker 2: in critical thinking, Like like, bro, like, you're not going
Speaker 2: to do that.
Speaker 1: So the question becomes do we check out of politics altogether?
Speaker 1: It doesn't seem like there is anything that we can
Speaker 1: do at this point that's going to make a difference
Speaker 1: at that level they have. It seems like they've just
Speaker 1: shown their hand that they can do whatever the hell
Speaker 1: they want, and they just want us to shut up
Speaker 1: about it. When has anything ever changed from voting or
Speaker 1: politics or any of our current systems. It's always been
Speaker 1: the same ruling class, just portrayed and rebranded in different ways.
Speaker 1: I just wonder what's the next step for humans?
Speaker 2: Well, you're one run. It's just been everything has just
Speaker 2: been rebranded and renamed. I mean, they're they're getting ready
Speaker 2: to do that with TikTok. They're shutting down TikTok and
Speaker 2: they're making TikTok. The new TikTok is going to be
Speaker 2: a US based company, but it's only going to be
Speaker 2: for the United States.
Speaker 1: Interesting when are they doing this?
Speaker 2: So? Uh, they've been pushing back the TikTok ban until
Speaker 2: the new app gets created. So the TikTok app is
Speaker 2: only going to be for people inside of the United States,
Speaker 2: So nobody from any other countries are going to be
Speaker 2: able to get this new app, but everybody else is
Speaker 2: still going to be using TikTok. Meanwhile, everybody inside of
Speaker 2: the United States and wants you use TikTok is not
Speaker 2: going to have to use this new app.
Speaker 1: See I've been kicked off tik talk three times since
Speaker 1: it started, so I don't really put much into that.
Speaker 1: I have my fourth account, which is still there for
Speaker 1: some reason, but I don't spend much time on it,
Speaker 1: and I haven't been paying attention to the politics behind it.
Speaker 1: What is really going on with all that?
Speaker 2: Well, it's a data information center, I mean. And the
Speaker 2: weird thing is is that all of TikTok's data is
Speaker 2: being stored in the United States, and has always been
Speaker 2: stored in the United States. So it doesn't make any
Speaker 2: sense this excuse for like that is China, right, this
Speaker 2: China is collecting all of our data. China's not It
Speaker 2: has never been stored in China, you're freaking idiots. Has
Speaker 2: always been stored in the United States.
Speaker 1: Interesting.
Speaker 2: So the only thing is that that I can think
Speaker 2: of as like something like with these algorithms. But the
Speaker 2: thing about the algorithms thing is the algorithm is like
Speaker 2: really easy to do. It's like the most easy thing. Literally,
Speaker 2: all you have to do is put up a bunch
Speaker 2: of other related videos to the video that you just watch.
Speaker 2: It's it's like these people, it's like these corporations and
Speaker 2: these people forgot how to do things but if you
Speaker 2: went back to their original YouTube, the original YouTube operated
Speaker 2: exactly the way that TikTok has operated for the past
Speaker 2: five years. You click on one video, you get a
Speaker 2: whole list of related videos on the sidebar that is
Speaker 2: immediately related to the video that you just watched. Now,
Speaker 2: that changed somewhere around two thousand and fifteen area where
Speaker 2: they started not doing that, but it seems like they
Speaker 2: forgot how to do that. It's pretty freaking simple. You
Speaker 2: just lump everything into the same category, and then whatever
Speaker 2: related within the title and within the thumbnail and within
Speaker 2: the description of the video is then placed in the
Speaker 2: recommended bar on the right hand side. TikTok essentially took
Speaker 2: that old model of YouTube and then advanced it with
Speaker 2: like AI learning and like then you can get into
Speaker 2: like these different Like you watch one video, then you're
Speaker 2: going to get suggested videos that are also related to
Speaker 2: that video that you just watched. That's how the for
Speaker 2: you page works on TikTok. If you watch one thing,
Speaker 2: you're gonna get recommended for ten other things that are
Speaker 2: very similar, and then it switches whenever you watch something
Speaker 2: that is not related. Right now, YouTube wasn't that advanced
Speaker 2: back in the back in the day, but they just
Speaker 2: expanded on the old YouTube algorithm is all that TikTok
Speaker 2: did in this generation. So it has to be something
Speaker 2: about the algorithm and something about the information that's on it.
Speaker 2: But I find that it's really interesting that now it's
Speaker 2: going to be just for the United States. I don't
Speaker 2: know of any other app that's a big social media
Speaker 2: app that is just for the United States. Facebook is worldwide,
Speaker 2: x Twitter is worldwide, Instagram is worldwide, YouTube's worldwide. I
Speaker 2: think Telegram is worldwide. Like everything else is like worldwide.
Speaker 2: But it seems like the it seems like like what
Speaker 2: they want to do is start bringing the borders in
Speaker 2: right metaphorically and literally. They want to get everybody consolidated
Speaker 2: back to their own country. So they're going to start
Speaker 2: making TikTok for Canada, so then you get nothing but
Speaker 2: Canada propaganda. They're doing TikTok for Mexico. They're going to
Speaker 2: do a TikTok for the United States. They're going to
Speaker 2: do a TikTok for Russia, a TikTok just for.
Speaker 1: This encountering the globalism pute. They're going for to merge
Speaker 1: everything together, especially in America, merging Canada and Mexico as
Speaker 1: one big country seemed to be in the background possibilities
Speaker 1: coming out with this technocratic globalism ideologies. But you're saying
Speaker 1: that this could possibly be the opposite, a little bit
Speaker 1: of separation.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, how are you going to control all
Speaker 2: those people worldwide? I mean they can barely control the
Speaker 2: people within the United States. Like, yeah, it's going to
Speaker 2: be ridiculously impossible, especially with the language barriers, to control
Speaker 2: everybody in the world simultaneously. It's going to be way,
Speaker 2: way bigger of a of a job to do it
Speaker 2: worldwide than it is to do it for one individual country.
Speaker 2: But I'm seeing this in like a way that by
Speaker 2: separating all of the different social medias and only giving
Speaker 2: people information from their country of origin so we wouldn't
Speaker 2: be able to get information, it's kind of like what
Speaker 2: Canada has already done. Canada has already done this, right,
Speaker 2: and it seems like that that would be the best
Speaker 2: way to do it. And then by doing that, then
Speaker 2: you control the information that's coming and you control the
Speaker 2: information that's going out. So essentially you have one hundred
Speaker 2: percent complete control of every country's information because every country's
Speaker 2: information is isolated to their own country. So then that's
Speaker 2: a way that you can literally control everything because and
Speaker 2: it's not like a because I'm not going to be
Speaker 2: able to figure out what's going on in Russia. I
Speaker 2: wouldn't be able to get on TikTok and look up
Speaker 2: you know, Chinese or download red Note or whatever. Canada
Speaker 2: already does that. Canada already bans things from other countries.
Speaker 2: You can't access stuff from other countries. So that seems
Speaker 2: to be the way to manipulate and control the public
Speaker 2: in a way that I don't think people really understood
Speaker 2: exactly what it was going to be. And this is
Speaker 2: the first step of doing that in the United States
Speaker 2: is to create TikTok, a US only information collection, data gathering,
Speaker 2: pushing it out, letting people post stuff. Because then you
Speaker 2: don't know what's going on. That's been my thing from
Speaker 2: the very beginning is that we don't ever know what's
Speaker 2: going on in other countries. All that we know that's
Speaker 2: going on in other countries is from what the media
Speaker 2: tells us, and it's always something back, a bombing, an assassination,
Speaker 2: a political scion with political ruse or whatever. You know.
Speaker 2: We don't know how these government structures work. We don't
Speaker 2: know how the society runs over there, you know. I
Speaker 2: mean Ryan Gable, our friend, he lives in Japan now,
Speaker 2: and he's like, Bro, things are like so different over
Speaker 2: here than any way that the United States. It's like
Speaker 2: so much more efficient. Like even the trash is organized
Speaker 2: over here. Even the homeless people are organized in Japan
Speaker 2: and are kind and respectful. Yeah, and also it's like,
Speaker 2: but you would never really know that unless you wink
Speaker 2: to Japan. You're never really going to know what Russia
Speaker 2: is like unless you go to Russia. You're not going
Speaker 2: to know what Germany's like unless you go to Germany.
Speaker 2: You're not going to know what the UK is like
Speaker 2: unless you go to the UK, because they don't just
Speaker 2: give us that type of information. So it's already kind
Speaker 2: of been segregated for a really long time. And I
Speaker 2: think that that was that wasn't what they were counting
Speaker 2: on with the Internet to begin with. I don't think
Speaker 2: that they were counting on the Worldwide Web in that
Speaker 2: sense that we could figure out whatever it is that's
Speaker 2: going on in freaking Papua New Guinea if we wanted
Speaker 2: to know what was going on in Papua New Guinea,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean. Yeah, And I think they're
Speaker 2: going to try and reel that back. And then they're
Speaker 2: going to try and reel it back and get a
Speaker 2: clisse close knit hold in on all the information so
Speaker 2: that they can control what goes in and what comes out.
Speaker 1: How much longer do you think until the algorithms AI
Speaker 1: technology as a whole gets so far away from humans
Speaker 1: that we have no idea how to control it anymore,
Speaker 1: In a sense that we've already made code that codes
Speaker 1: itself and then creates algorithms for itself and then creates
Speaker 1: new codes that probably the original programmer has no idea
Speaker 1: how the new code works that was created by the
Speaker 1: artificial intelligence. And the longer this goes on, it makes
Speaker 1: me wonder if we would ever be able to have
Speaker 1: that baseline control over technology anymore, if it gets too
Speaker 1: far ahead of us. What do you think about that?
Speaker 2: I mean, it's completely possible. I think a sort of
Speaker 2: AI control grid, because again, the AI is going to
Speaker 2: be our god, the AI is going to be our savior.
Speaker 2: I mean, we've been talking about the whole AI thing
Speaker 2: as like that is going to fix all of our problems.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's the way the AI is already being
Speaker 2: looked at like it's going to clean up the ocean,
Speaker 2: is going to solve political issues, is going to solve homelessness,
Speaker 2: is going to solve hunger, It's going to create world peace.
Speaker 2: You know, that's what people would look at it as
Speaker 2: like a Christ figure. That's what they think that Christ
Speaker 2: would do. Right, if Christ came back, that's what you
Speaker 2: would do. Not coming back for the rapture, but if
Speaker 2: he was going to come back again. That's what people
Speaker 2: believe that Christ like endless piece. He's going to fix
Speaker 2: all this stuff with a magic wand fixed. Okay, so
Speaker 2: we are already looking at AI as a god or
Speaker 2: a demi god, and he has been looked at like
Speaker 2: that for a really long time. Now could it get
Speaker 2: to the point where it, you know, can take over?
Speaker 2: I mean, if you look at like the movies that
Speaker 2: have been coming out recently with these you know, these
Speaker 2: artificial intelligent robot I don't think we're far off.
Speaker 1: Probably not for public use, but how.
Speaker 2: Long have they really had these freaking AI, non biological robots.
Speaker 2: I would say for a pretty long freaking time. Now
Speaker 2: I have no proof and I have no evidence of that.
Speaker 2: But you're take into consideration how important it would be
Speaker 2: to have one of these non biological robots that are
Speaker 2: just freaking robots that look identical to me, and you
Speaker 2: what they could do with that.
Speaker 1: Did you see the Black Mirror episode with the computer
Speaker 1: video game programmer Guy. I think it was in the
Speaker 1: most recent season, where the little beings in the computer
Speaker 1: program were sentient and eventually they figured out this way
Speaker 1: to broadcast this signal or frequency that would basically take
Speaker 1: over all of humanity's minds. It just makes me think
Speaker 1: of what we're talking about right now, I mean, Black Mirror.
Speaker 1: If that's not a warning about the possibilities for our future,
Speaker 1: I don't know what is.
Speaker 2: That was a really interesting episode, really interesting. He drew
Speaker 2: that symbol on the piece of paper and then he
Speaker 2: put it up to the camera and the camera recognized it,
Speaker 2: like yeah, downloaded the virus onto everywhere, and then everyone
Speaker 2: like dropped dead all day exact same then they were
Speaker 2: all infiltrated with like this what could be described as
Speaker 2: like nano bots or these bots are inside of the computer.
Speaker 2: What did they say that it was to remove remove
Speaker 2: emotions and.
Speaker 1: I don't remember exactly what it was for.
Speaker 2: It was something like that. It was like to create
Speaker 2: piece by removing emotion, the human psyche or something like that,
Speaker 2: where everyone is like essentially this, Yeah, they're all hive mind. Yeah, robots.
Speaker 2: They all dress the like, they all look alike, they
Speaker 2: all say the same thing. Yeah. It's a really interesting one.
Speaker 2: The other really interesting one was the neurolink one as
Speaker 2: well with the ads. Yes, I think it was the first,
Speaker 2: which also had to do with the bees. She said
Speaker 2: that the bees had been replaced by robot bees and
Speaker 2: that's why she was getting these headaches if you remember correctly.
Speaker 2: So they had replace all the bees with like robot bees,
Speaker 2: and then she was getting these headaches. And then she
Speaker 2: had that seizure or whatever. She passed out and then
Speaker 2: she was in like a coma. And then the doctor
Speaker 2: came to the guy and was like, hey, we have
Speaker 2: this brand new developing technology. She can only be awake
Speaker 2: and active during a certain period of like a certain radius.
Speaker 2: Then it's like you gotta upgrade, upgrade, upgrade the package.
Speaker 2: Get the package. If not, if you don't get the
Speaker 2: latest package, then she's just gonna be spending out ads
Speaker 2: all the time. It's a it was a beautiful commentary
Speaker 2: on our.
Speaker 1: Digital relationship with technology. It's such a toxic one.
Speaker 2: And then what was the name of that app that
Speaker 2: that guy was Dummy Dumb dumbs. Dummy dumb Dumbs was
Speaker 2: the name of the app the guy the people were
Speaker 2: on there making money on that because there were a
Speaker 2: bunch of construction workers or there were oil field workers
Speaker 2: or welders or whatever, and to make money on the side,
Speaker 2: they were all doing this app called Dummy Dumb Dumbs
Speaker 2: where they just people would sending them money to do
Speaker 2: stupid shit online on a webcam.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I gotta go back and what said that last
Speaker 1: season was good?
Speaker 2: Ah, bro, that episode was like a perfect commentary on
Speaker 2: like the digital age. And it wouldn't surprise me if
Speaker 2: we did end up getting something similar to the Dummy
Speaker 2: Dum Dumbs app in that first episode of like Black Mirror,
Speaker 2: where I mean we already kind of see it, like
Speaker 2: we're seeing that unfold before our eyes right now with
Speaker 2: uh like buying and selling things online, right, what is
Speaker 2: the name of that app that everyone's buying stuff from. Uh,
Speaker 2: it's like an auction, it's like a live eBay thing whatnot, whatnot?
Speaker 2: So that's what they're doing like on whatnot, So they'll
Speaker 2: get on the stream and then they'll have like items
Speaker 2: and things that they will sell and then people bid
Speaker 2: on the They have like sixty seconds to bid on it.
Speaker 2: Then whatever the highest bid is on the product that
Speaker 2: they're selling, then it gets shipped to that person. Yeah,
Speaker 2: like things are changing, brok and that seems like it's
Speaker 2: going to be the future. Is uh like it's going
Speaker 2: to be by sell trade online, these type of whatnot streams,
Speaker 2: it's going to turn into you know, streaming where people
Speaker 2: I mean, you can already get all your stuff basically
Speaker 2: delivered to your house. You don't even really need to
Speaker 2: go to the store anymore. You can now watch movies
Speaker 2: on streaming, Like you don't have to go to the
Speaker 2: movie theater anymore. Just watch it on you know, Disney
Speaker 2: freaking Plus. I mean, Happy Gilmore Too just came out
Speaker 2: like a couple of days ago. You can already watch
Speaker 2: it on freaking Netflix.
Speaker 1: There's some very stupid trends. There's some things that are
Speaker 1: probably making our reality worse for everybody as we speak.
Speaker 1: Social media has become just a tox success pool of nonsense.
Speaker 1: For the most part, the only thing I've used it
Speaker 1: for for a long time is to advertise my show
Speaker 1: and the things that I'm working on. And now you know,
Speaker 1: you do the same thing. But it's gotten to the
Speaker 1: point where people are making up entire events and stories
Speaker 1: and scenarios and putting them out there as if they
Speaker 1: were really happening. People are profiting from the AI and
Speaker 1: the nonsense and they're putting out there, and it's just
Speaker 1: become a very dark time for social media and any
Speaker 1: interactions that you're going to try and get out of it.
Speaker 1: Even if you're doing what we do and trying to
Speaker 1: promote our shows, promote our work that gets so suppressed
Speaker 1: by the algorithm. It's not being pushed like the twerking
Speaker 1: or the dog and cat videos or the fake nonsense
Speaker 1: UFO videos. It doesn't get picked up by the algorithm.
Speaker 1: We're stuck in our echo chambers and it's difficult also
Speaker 1: for us to get new information from outside of our
Speaker 1: echo chambers. So not sure where we go from here.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and if you look at those like old those challenges,
Speaker 2: you remember, like the condom challenge or whatever, where they
Speaker 2: would put they would what would they do, put it
Speaker 2: through their nose? They like snort it and then they
Speaker 2: pull it out of their mouth or whatever. The tie
Speaker 2: pod challenge, the ice bucket challenge, like all that stuff
Speaker 2: is like is like programming and like mind control shit.
Speaker 2: It's like how many people can we get to do
Speaker 2: the stupid ass ship, Like how many people are going
Speaker 2: to do it? And it's it's an experiment. And we
Speaker 2: don't really see those too much anymore because they figured
Speaker 2: out they know now, like you don't really see that
Speaker 2: there's not really any challenge. I mean there's TikTok challenges
Speaker 2: and like TikTok dances, which is just the evolution of
Speaker 2: the the old school challenges.
Speaker 1: Right, But it's just like AI. Now almost every other
Speaker 1: video you scroll across is going to be some kind
Speaker 1: of fake AI animated or created video.
Speaker 2: But that's the other thing of this is, oh well,
Speaker 2: anything that gets released that may be real also can
Speaker 2: get lumped into that category as well as a double sword, right, people,
Speaker 2: If you if something is released that is real, then
Speaker 2: there's going to be a section of the population that's AI.
Speaker 2: That's a I analyzed it, I put it into my
Speaker 2: AI reader, and it's that that's AI. So it's it's
Speaker 2: a double edged sword. With that stuff, so it's you know,
Speaker 2: it's a way to also mind control and program people
Speaker 2: into not believing anything as well, like to you know,
Speaker 2: give up on reality. Essentially, it's either you know, because
Speaker 2: you're gonna have that's splitting. It's all about confusion. That's
Speaker 2: been the name of the game since nineteen eighty three,
Speaker 2: is confusion, right. You put out so much information, so
Speaker 2: much nonsense, so much garbage, you cloud it under all
Speaker 2: of these other things. You have everybody talking about it.
Speaker 2: That's why the government loves conspiracy theories. They love conspiracy theories.
Speaker 2: Actually they want more conspiracy there because the more conspiracy
Speaker 2: theories that are out there, the more that they can
Speaker 2: continue to do the same thing that they've been continuing
Speaker 2: to do for years and years and years, and the
Speaker 2: real information can be swept up underneath the rug because
Speaker 2: none of us can ever be on the same page.
Speaker 2: And that's where the confusion factor comes in. If everyone's confused,
Speaker 2: everybody has their own opinions on everything that's going on,
Speaker 2: no one can agree upon anything, then we're divided. There's
Speaker 2: gonna be absolutely nothing that we can do about any
Speaker 2: of this stuff. We will just be talking in the
Speaker 2: echo Chamber over and over and over and over again.
Speaker 2: I mean, this is this is probably what is this
Speaker 2: like the second or third time we've ever talked about Epstein.
Speaker 2: I guarantee you bro in the next five to ten years,
Speaker 2: we're going to do this again. We're going to talk
Speaker 2: about Epstein again, probably ten or fifteen more times, and
Speaker 2: nothing is ever going to be done about it because
Speaker 2: there's nothing that we can literally do about it. You know,
Speaker 2: like we're just out here talking and and people are
Speaker 2: hearing it, and then like, what are we actually going
Speaker 2: to do? There's literally nothing that we can do really
Speaker 2: about any of this stuff. It's just yeah, you talk
Speaker 2: about the information. You can bring the information a lot.
Speaker 2: You can make people aware, which is good. I like
Speaker 2: making making people aware. I like putting out, you know, factual,
Speaker 2: good information for people to listen to. But as far
Speaker 2: as doing something about it, you're not gonna be able
Speaker 2: to do anything about any of the show. But what
Speaker 2: documentary have you ever watched? This actually changed fucking anything? Nothing?
Speaker 2: What what show has actually changed the course of anything?
Speaker 2: Probably maybe like Joe Rogan has changed something. Someone's heard
Speaker 2: something that Joe Rogan has said and been like Okay, well,
Speaker 2: we need to maybe make some kind of and I
Speaker 2: think he was responsible for some of the eye would
Speaker 2: gain stuff and the legalization of some things and stuff.
Speaker 2: But really it's like we're we're sitting here with like
Speaker 2: a with like a hope and a prayer almost or
Speaker 2: praying to that Ai God, praying to that Ai God
Speaker 2: to come in and make some changes, you know. But
Speaker 2: it's like we're we're honestly just you know, speaking to
Speaker 2: the choir at this point, and it's become like a
Speaker 2: kind of kind of redundant and in this you know,
Speaker 2: Merry go round of information. Well, making is great again, baby,
Speaker 2: make conspiracy great again.
Speaker 1: I think the one thing that you can do, and
Speaker 1: that each and every one of us can do, is
Speaker 1: to enjoy our lives and make the best of it.
Speaker 1: And you're already doing that, and you're already providing information
Speaker 1: and entertainment for the folks out there alternatives to the bullshit.
Speaker 1: So you're doing your thing already, bro, And I think
Speaker 1: that's pretty much all we can do at this point.
Speaker 1: But speaking of maybe you could tell us a little
Speaker 1: bit about what you're working on without giving away too much.
Speaker 2: Yes, I thank you very much, Chris, And yeah, I
Speaker 2: didn't mean not to come off like any type of
Speaker 2: way or that you know, people shouldn't be doing this.
Speaker 2: I'm obviously going to continue to do it, but it
Speaker 2: just gets kind of like some days you're just like,
Speaker 2: oh man, does get rough out there. But I appreciate
Speaker 2: everybody that's listening, and I appreciate everybody that's helped me
Speaker 2: out on my show, chause you've helped me out a lot.
Speaker 2: Appreciate all of my followers, all my listeners, and appreciate
Speaker 2: the Forbidden Knowledge News Network and everybody that's associated with it.
Speaker 2: So don't misconstrue my words there, audience, But yes, my
Speaker 2: new documentary is going to be about the Psychic Spy
Speaker 2: Stargate program. It's going to have people in it that
Speaker 2: were involved in the creation of it and were involved
Speaker 2: in SRI, which was the study of it, the Scientific
Speaker 2: Study of Psychics and Remote Viewing. And I'm going to
Speaker 2: be starting filming next month and has been written completely.
Speaker 2: And now I'm going to be starting the filming process
Speaker 2: and get into pre production on that and hopefully have
Speaker 2: it out whenever I get it done, because I'm not
Speaker 2: gonna well, once I get everything filmed, then I'm going
Speaker 2: to be on it, but don't know exactly when that's
Speaker 2: going to fall, but yeah, be looking forward to that.
Speaker 2: And thanks for having me on, Chris. If people interested
Speaker 2: in checking out more of my work, you can find
Speaker 2: me on Raised by Giants, on YouTube and any and
Speaker 2: all podcast platforms, and if you would like to reach
Speaker 2: out to me personally, you can find me on Instagram
Speaker 2: at Raised by a Giants pod, and on x Twitter
Speaker 2: and Raised by Giants eight and on Facebook at Raised
Speaker 2: by Giants. Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1: Brothers, let It Be Written, Let It Be Done. Could
Speaker 1: definitely be doing this again in the future. Until next time, everyone,
Speaker 1: have an excellent evening. We'll talk again tomorrow. Seldian