WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.960 --> 00:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the debate.

2
00:00:03.560 --> 00:00:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Thanks glad to be here.

3
00:00:04.919 --> 00:00:08.679
<v Speaker 1>So right now, there are well over one hundred multi

4
00:00:08.720 --> 00:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar AI data centers that are just trying to

5
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:13.759
<v Speaker 1>plug into Pennsylvania's electric.

6
00:00:13.480 --> 00:00:16.839
<v Speaker 2>Cred Oh yeah, the volume is staggering right now.

7
00:00:16.719 --> 00:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, It's massive, and almost none of them have any

8
00:00:20.480 --> 00:00:24.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of public approval because usually the traditional assumption with

9
00:00:24.679 --> 00:00:27.519
<v Speaker 1>large scale infrastructure is that you have a public process, right,

10
00:00:27.519 --> 00:00:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you have local zoning, hearing.

11
00:00:28.800 --> 00:00:31.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, legislative oversight, town halls, all of that exactly.

12
00:00:32.320 --> 00:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But hyperscale AI facilities have historically just bypassed all of that.

13
00:00:37.000 --> 00:00:40.200
<v Speaker 1>They operate under this veil of total secrecy. So today

14
00:00:40.240 --> 00:00:44.399
<v Speaker 1>we are diving into Pennsylvania's Executive Order twenty twenty six zero.

15
00:00:44.200 --> 00:00:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Five, which is a pretty wild piece of policy.

16
00:00:47.359 --> 00:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>It really is. It's this groundbreaking regulatory framework designed to

17
00:00:53.320 --> 00:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>rain in the industry. And what makes it so fascinating

18
00:00:57.079 --> 00:01:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and honestly pretty controversial is that it operates entirely without

19
00:01:01.759 --> 00:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>new legislation.

20
00:01:02.960 --> 00:01:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we are basically looking at a state executive branch

21
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:10.799
<v Speaker 3>just completely bypassing its own legislature to regulate one of

22
00:01:10.840 --> 00:01:15.799
<v Speaker 3>the most capital intensive, resource heavy industries on the planet

23
00:01:15.920 --> 00:01:17.680
<v Speaker 3>using only administrative levers.

24
00:01:17.799 --> 00:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Right, So the core question we really need to resolve

25
00:01:20.120 --> 00:01:24.359
<v Speaker 1>today is this how effective and I guess how legitimate

26
00:01:24.959 --> 00:01:28.079
<v Speaker 1>is it to use existing permitting authority to do this?

27
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Like seeing how contracts replace new laws essentially right, using

28
00:01:32.480 --> 00:01:37.159
<v Speaker 1>these state contracts to enforce really strict rules. And specifically

29
00:01:37.239 --> 00:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to analyze the technical requirements on water and

30
00:01:40.719 --> 00:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>energy consumption.

31
00:01:41.599 --> 00:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Because that's where the actual physical impact hits the local community.

32
00:01:44.719 --> 00:01:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Exactly can a contract act as a direct substitute for

33
00:01:48.439 --> 00:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>traditional lawmaking? So our discussion today is rooted in the

34
00:01:51.599 --> 00:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>recent rollout of the Governor's Responsible Infrastructure Development or the

35
00:01:55.879 --> 00:01:59.599
<v Speaker 1>grid requirements right in a state's mandatory template, the Consent

36
00:01:59.719 --> 00:02:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Order Agreement, the CoA. Yeah, yeah, the CoA. So I'll

37
00:02:03.959 --> 00:02:06.519
<v Speaker 1>be making the case that this contract based approach is

38
00:02:06.640 --> 00:02:11.159
<v Speaker 1>frankly a brilliant pragmatic innovation. It successfully forces developers to

39
00:02:11.199 --> 00:02:14.879
<v Speaker 1>internalize their massive energy and water impacts, and it totally

40
00:02:14.919 --> 00:02:18.039
<v Speaker 1>bypasses the legislative gridlock that usually stalls this stuff.

41
00:02:18.080 --> 00:02:20.879
<v Speaker 3>And I am going to argue that relying on executive

42
00:02:20.919 --> 00:02:26.800
<v Speaker 3>permitting levers and forced contracts, it basically circumvents the democratic process.

43
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:31.759
<v Speaker 3>It creates this precarious regulatory instability and honestly technical constraints

44
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:35.759
<v Speaker 3>that I think will ultimately paralyze critical infrastructure development.

45
00:02:36.000 --> 00:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let me lay out the foundation of my

46
00:02:38.479 --> 00:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>position first. From my perspective, Pennsylvania has effectively cracked the

47
00:02:43.439 --> 00:02:45.199
<v Speaker 1>code on modern tech regulation.

48
00:02:45.759 --> 00:02:47.240
<v Speaker 2>That's a bold claim.

49
00:02:47.439 --> 00:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's true. Though. They realized a very simple,

50
00:02:50.599 --> 00:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>very powerful truth, which is that contracts can substitute for

51
00:02:54.439 --> 00:02:56.879
<v Speaker 1>new laws when the law just fails to keep pace

52
00:02:56.960 --> 00:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>with technology. Okay, but we'll just think about it. We

53
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all know that AI capabilities scale exponentially, right, they turn

54
00:03:04.039 --> 00:03:08.159
<v Speaker 1>over every six to twelve months. But state legislatures they

55
00:03:08.280 --> 00:03:11.719
<v Speaker 1>operate on these sluggish, linear timelines.

56
00:03:12.120 --> 00:03:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Sure, the legislative process is slow by design.

57
00:03:15.240 --> 00:03:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Right, but Governor Josh Shapiro didn't wait for a divided

58
00:03:18.560 --> 00:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>legislature to catch up. Instead, the state fundamentally changed the

59
00:03:22.319 --> 00:03:25.879
<v Speaker 1>rules of engagement. They are now conditioning the mere opening

60
00:03:25.919 --> 00:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of a Department of Environmental Protection a DP permit file

61
00:03:30.039 --> 00:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on the developer signing a legally binding consent order and agreement.

62
00:03:33.719 --> 00:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>They won't even open the file.

63
00:03:35.360 --> 00:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, they won't even look at it. The state is

64
00:03:37.680 --> 00:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>wielding its existing administrative authority to just blast through the gridlock.

65
00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And the technical brilliance of these grid requirements is that

66
00:03:44.360 --> 00:03:47.479
<v Speaker 1>developers must now legally commit to paying the full cost

67
00:03:47.479 --> 00:03:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of generation, transmission and distribution.

68
00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Upgrades, which are massively expensive, exactly massively, and they have

69
00:03:54.879 --> 00:03:57.560
<v Speaker 3>to meet strict water conservation standards.

70
00:03:57.919 --> 00:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So by utilizing a contract to manded these upgrades, the

71
00:04:01.120 --> 00:04:05.479
<v Speaker 1>executive branch prevents the staggering infrastructural costs of hyperscale AI

72
00:04:05.639 --> 00:04:08.879
<v Speaker 1>from being you know, quietly absorbed by local households and

73
00:04:08.960 --> 00:04:13.199
<v Speaker 1>small businesses. Right. It is this elegant, immediate solution to

74
00:04:13.240 --> 00:04:17.079
<v Speaker 1>an exploding problem that the legislature just utterly failed to solve.

75
00:04:18.240 --> 00:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I see where you're coming from.

76
00:04:19.920 --> 00:04:23.480
<v Speaker 3>But I approach this from a completely different philosophical and

77
00:04:23.639 --> 00:04:27.480
<v Speaker 3>honestly practical foundation. Okay, this framework, it is not a

78
00:04:27.600 --> 00:04:32.360
<v Speaker 3>brilliant administrative innovation. I mean, it is textbook regulatory coercion.

79
00:04:32.600 --> 00:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Coercion is a strong word, but it fits.

80
00:04:35.199 --> 00:04:39.560
<v Speaker 3>It undermines the predictability required for major capital investments. Look,

81
00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:43.480
<v Speaker 3>a contract fundamentally implies two willing parties coming to a

82
00:04:43.560 --> 00:04:44.399
<v Speaker 3>mutual agreement.

83
00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Right. Generally yes, right.

84
00:04:47.519 --> 00:04:51.560
<v Speaker 3>In this context, developers who refuse to sign this specific

85
00:04:51.600 --> 00:04:57.240
<v Speaker 3>consent order, they are permanently removed from Pennsylvania's permit FastTrack program.

86
00:04:57.639 --> 00:05:00.399
<v Speaker 3>The dep just simply refuses to even ow open their

87
00:05:00.399 --> 00:05:05.040
<v Speaker 3>application file until every single local municipal approval is secured

88
00:05:05.439 --> 00:05:09.480
<v Speaker 3>and every construction permit has already been reviewed through the traditional,

89
00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:11.160
<v Speaker 3>agonizingly slow.

90
00:05:10.959 --> 00:05:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Channels, which takes year's exactly.

91
00:05:14.319 --> 00:05:18.199
<v Speaker 3>It completely inverts the normal sequencing that developers rely on

92
00:05:18.279 --> 00:05:21.279
<v Speaker 3>to secure financing. I mean, you cannot get bank funding

93
00:05:21.279 --> 00:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>without a permit path, right, and you cannot get a

94
00:05:23.560 --> 00:05:29.120
<v Speaker 3>permit path without signing this executive ultimatum, so it's not mutual. Furthermore,

95
00:05:29.199 --> 00:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>we really have to recognize the extreme fragility of this method.

96
00:05:32.399 --> 00:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Because it's an executive order, because no statute was passed.

97
00:05:35.800 --> 00:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Pennsylvania House actually passed bipartisan grid legislation, but

98
00:05:40.639 --> 00:05:42.959
<v Speaker 3>Senate Republicans declined to move it.

99
00:05:42.959 --> 00:05:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Forward, right the gridlock I mentioned.

100
00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:49.639
<v Speaker 3>Sure, But because the executive branch decided to act unilaterally anyway,

101
00:05:50.120 --> 00:05:53.480
<v Speaker 3>this entire multi billion dollar framework, it just rests on

102
00:05:53.519 --> 00:05:56.040
<v Speaker 3>the stroke of a pen by a single governor, a

103
00:05:56.079 --> 00:05:59.000
<v Speaker 3>governor facing re election this November, I might add.

104
00:05:59.000 --> 00:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I know the timing is tight right, So.

105
00:06:01.759 --> 00:06:04.879
<v Speaker 3>Any future administration can simply revoke the order on day one.

106
00:06:05.319 --> 00:06:08.319
<v Speaker 3>When you compare this to actual codified laws enacted by

107
00:06:08.360 --> 00:06:12.519
<v Speaker 3>legislatures in places like you know, California, Ohio, Utah, this

108
00:06:12.600 --> 00:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>contractual method creates a disastrous, unpredictable foundation. Multi billion dollar

109
00:06:17.959 --> 00:06:22.319
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure requires decades of certainty, not fragile political workarounds.

110
00:06:22.519 --> 00:06:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I definitely understand the concern regarding statutory permanence.

111
00:06:26.959 --> 00:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But let's examine how this contractual mechanism actually functions in reality. Okay, specifically,

112
00:06:33.079 --> 00:06:35.759
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the ban on secrecy, I think

113
00:06:35.800 --> 00:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the overarching legality and frankly, the moral justification of this

114
00:06:40.439 --> 00:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>framework is validated by the specific mechanism that makes it work,

115
00:06:44.759 --> 00:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>which is the outright ban on non disclosure.

116
00:06:47.319 --> 00:06:49.079
<v Speaker 2>Agreements the NDAs.

117
00:06:49.199 --> 00:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, the NDAs. Yeah, The executive order dictates that the

118
00:06:52.879 --> 00:06:56.319
<v Speaker 1>use of NDAs is no longer permissible for Commonwealth agencies

119
00:06:56.360 --> 00:07:00.519
<v Speaker 1>interacting with these developers, and for the past decade have

120
00:07:00.519 --> 00:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>been the global standard for data center siting.

121
00:07:02.720 --> 00:07:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

122
00:07:02.920 --> 00:07:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, everything is hidden behind shell companies, right.

123
00:07:06.839 --> 00:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>These shell companies are utilized to deliberately hide load projections

124
00:07:10.600 --> 00:07:13.519
<v Speaker 1>and water draw from the very residents who will actually

125
00:07:13.519 --> 00:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>be impacted. So, coming back to how contracts substitute for

126
00:07:17.600 --> 00:07:21.199
<v Speaker 1>new laws, this contract substitutes for a new law by

127
00:07:21.240 --> 00:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>mandating absolute public disclosure to earn local consent.

128
00:07:25.160 --> 00:07:27.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm not defending NDAs.

129
00:07:27.199 --> 00:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But just think about it from a practical standpoint. It

130
00:07:30.240 --> 00:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is like someone buying the empty lot next to your house,

131
00:07:33.399 --> 00:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>right but legally forbidding you or even the town council

132
00:07:37.519 --> 00:07:39.639
<v Speaker 1>from knowing if they plan to turn it into a

133
00:07:39.680 --> 00:07:42.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour industrial factory that will just drain the

134
00:07:43.000 --> 00:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>local reservoir. Sure no one wants that exactly. The state

135
00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is entirely justified in withholding public fast tracks and these

136
00:07:52.199 --> 00:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>lucrative tax exemptions from entities that demand total secrecy. The

137
00:07:56.600 --> 00:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>government is simply saying, if you want our expedited administry help,

138
00:08:00.600 --> 00:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to tell us exactly who you are and

139
00:08:02.600 --> 00:08:03.399
<v Speaker 1>what you're building.

140
00:08:03.759 --> 00:08:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Look, the concept of transparency is incredibly popular. I'll give

141
00:08:07.079 --> 00:08:10.279
<v Speaker 3>you that, but let's look at the actual bureaucratic reality

142
00:08:10.360 --> 00:08:12.920
<v Speaker 3>of weaponizing the permitting process.

143
00:08:12.560 --> 00:08:13.199
<v Speaker 2>To achieve it.

144
00:08:13.839 --> 00:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Weaponizing, Yeah, weaponizing you mentioned with holding tax exemptions. This

145
00:08:19.199 --> 00:08:22.040
<v Speaker 3>is where the legal gymnastics of this executive order really

146
00:08:22.079 --> 00:08:25.079
<v Speaker 3>become a parent. The administration is tying the Department of

147
00:08:25.120 --> 00:08:28.959
<v Speaker 3>Revenues sales and Use tax exemptions which are massive, I

148
00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:32.639
<v Speaker 3>mean massive financial incentives for server hardware directly to the

149
00:08:32.679 --> 00:08:35.320
<v Speaker 3>signing of the Dep's environmental contract.

150
00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Right leveraging the incentive.

151
00:08:36.919 --> 00:08:40.720
<v Speaker 3>But that creates a convoluted maze of interagency hostage taking.

152
00:08:41.120 --> 00:08:44.039
<v Speaker 3>By linking a tax incentive to a grid priority surrender,

153
00:08:44.360 --> 00:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>you aren't streamlining good projects. You are creating a massive

154
00:08:47.519 --> 00:08:48.879
<v Speaker 3>administrative choke point.

155
00:08:49.120 --> 00:08:50.919
<v Speaker 1>But is it a choke point or a filter?

156
00:08:51.279 --> 00:08:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, look at the data release with the order. It

157
00:08:53.240 --> 00:08:56.399
<v Speaker 3>reveals a staggering bottleneck. There are over one hundred projects

158
00:08:56.399 --> 00:08:59.559
<v Speaker 3>sitting in public databases right now in Pennsylvania. Of those

159
00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:03.679
<v Speaker 3>fifty eight of approach the DP okay, only fifteen have

160
00:09:03.840 --> 00:09:08.000
<v Speaker 3>actually formally applied for a permit and exactly five, just

161
00:09:08.159 --> 00:09:10.080
<v Speaker 3>five hold what is needed for.

162
00:09:10.039 --> 00:09:14.080
<v Speaker 2>A first phase Wow. Okay, five out of one hundred.

163
00:09:14.440 --> 00:09:19.039
<v Speaker 3>When you use complex interagency contracts to substitute for clear laws,

164
00:09:19.320 --> 00:09:22.919
<v Speaker 3>you don't speed up responsible development. You create a paralyzed

165
00:09:23.000 --> 00:09:26.240
<v Speaker 3>environment where developers are basically just waiting to see how

166
00:09:26.279 --> 00:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>a rotating cast of executive agencies will interpret a newly

167
00:09:30.200 --> 00:09:31.399
<v Speaker 3>minted consent order.

168
00:09:31.639 --> 00:09:32.759
<v Speaker 2>Before they commit capital.

169
00:09:33.000 --> 00:09:36.039
<v Speaker 1>See I look at that bottleneck, and I don't think

170
00:09:36.120 --> 00:09:39.159
<v Speaker 1>that is a failure of the system. I think it

171
00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:41.799
<v Speaker 1>is the system working exactly as intended.

172
00:09:42.240 --> 00:09:45.879
<v Speaker 3>How is blocking ninety five percent of projects working as intended?

173
00:09:46.559 --> 00:09:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Because sorting those one hundred projects out in public, forcing

174
00:09:49.679 --> 00:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>them to meet the grid requirements before they receive the

175
00:09:52.159 --> 00:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>state's blessing. That is how you separate viable, responsible infrastructure

176
00:09:56.519 --> 00:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>from what are essentially speculative land grabs.

177
00:09:59.159 --> 00:10:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean some them are speculative, Sure.

178
00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them are. And this forces developers to

179
00:10:04.639 --> 00:10:07.879
<v Speaker 1>consult communities early enough in the process to actually shape

180
00:10:07.879 --> 00:10:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the design decisions, rather than presenting a finished, unalterable schematic

181
00:10:12.720 --> 00:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to a town under the threat of litigation, which is

182
00:10:15.080 --> 00:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what they usually do.

183
00:10:16.200 --> 00:10:20.080
<v Speaker 3>But transparency over data means nothing. If the facility brings

184
00:10:20.120 --> 00:10:22.639
<v Speaker 3>the electric grid to its knees first.

185
00:10:22.360 --> 00:10:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Well that's where the technical requirements.

186
00:10:23.879 --> 00:10:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Come in, right, And the DP knows this, which is

187
00:10:26.240 --> 00:10:30.240
<v Speaker 3>why they tied these transparency disclosures directly to the most

188
00:10:30.279 --> 00:10:34.080
<v Speaker 3>controversial part of this whole order, which is the curtailment ranking.

189
00:10:34.240 --> 00:10:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Ah, the curtailment ranking.

190
00:10:36.360 --> 00:10:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this shifts our focus to the physical consequences on

191
00:10:40.039 --> 00:10:43.679
<v Speaker 3>the power grid. The Special Council for Energy Fordability is

192
00:10:43.799 --> 00:10:47.720
<v Speaker 3>actively pushing the Public Utility Commission to mandate the data

193
00:10:47.720 --> 00:10:51.039
<v Speaker 3>centers lose electric service before anyone else when the grid

194
00:10:51.080 --> 00:10:51.720
<v Speaker 3>is under strain.

195
00:10:51.919 --> 00:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, which protects hospital, schools and you know, residential neighborhoods

196
00:10:55.039 --> 00:10:58.879
<v Speaker 1>from rolling blackouts during extreme weather events. That seems entirely reasonable.

197
00:10:58.960 --> 00:11:02.440
<v Speaker 3>It protects them by destroying the fundamental business model of

198
00:11:02.480 --> 00:11:03.639
<v Speaker 3>AI infrastructure.

199
00:11:03.840 --> 00:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, explain that because I think a lot of people

200
00:11:05.879 --> 00:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just see them as giant server rooms.

201
00:11:08.200 --> 00:11:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, we really need to unpack the mechanics of what

202
00:11:10.960 --> 00:11:14.559
<v Speaker 3>happens inside these facilities. If a company is training a

203
00:11:14.639 --> 00:11:18.679
<v Speaker 3>large language model, a trillion parameter AI model, they have

204
00:11:18.840 --> 00:11:22.679
<v Speaker 3>tens of thousands of GPUs synchronizing weight updates in real time.

205
00:11:23.000 --> 00:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Right.

206
00:11:23.320 --> 00:11:24.519
<v Speaker 2>If the regional.

207
00:11:24.080 --> 00:11:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Grid operator cuts their power because say it's a hot

208
00:11:27.559 --> 00:11:31.159
<v Speaker 3>day in July and the grid is stressed, the hardware

209
00:11:31.360 --> 00:11:32.799
<v Speaker 3>doesn't just pause nicely.

210
00:11:33.240 --> 00:11:34.919
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't just pick up where it left off.

211
00:11:35.320 --> 00:11:39.799
<v Speaker 3>No, not at all. The system desynchronizes. You corrupt the

212
00:11:39.879 --> 00:11:44.840
<v Speaker 3>checkpoint data. The developer loses days, sometimes weeks of complex

213
00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:49.519
<v Speaker 3>computational math, which easily translates to tens of millions of

214
00:11:49.600 --> 00:11:53.200
<v Speaker 3>dollars in lost capital per event. Oh wow, yeah, it's

215
00:11:53.240 --> 00:11:57.279
<v Speaker 3>catastrophic for a training run. If developers are forced, via

216
00:11:57.320 --> 00:12:00.679
<v Speaker 3>this mandatory contract to price in the extra dream risk

217
00:12:00.759 --> 00:12:03.480
<v Speaker 3>of losing power first, they are just not going to

218
00:12:03.519 --> 00:12:06.720
<v Speaker 3>build in Pennsylvania. They will take their capital to states

219
00:12:06.720 --> 00:12:10.279
<v Speaker 3>that don't treat them as a disposable, interruptible asset.

220
00:12:10.399 --> 00:12:11.519
<v Speaker 1>I see the risk there, but.

221
00:12:11.840 --> 00:12:15.639
<v Speaker 3>And wait, furthermore, the order demands they pay for pgm's

222
00:12:15.679 --> 00:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>reliability backstop auctions, right the regional grid operator exactly PJM.

223
00:12:21.519 --> 00:12:26.120
<v Speaker 3>If the regional transmission organization and backstop auctions are essentially

224
00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:29.759
<v Speaker 3>capacity markets, you pay power plants to stay on standby

225
00:12:30.039 --> 00:12:33.919
<v Speaker 3>just in case demand spikes. Forcing data centers to shoulder

226
00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:37.919
<v Speaker 3>that standby cost alone through an executive contract rather than

227
00:12:37.919 --> 00:12:41.639
<v Speaker 3>a broad legislative tax is While it's like making a

228
00:12:41.679 --> 00:12:44.679
<v Speaker 3>new resident pay for a fully staffed ambulance to sit

229
00:12:44.720 --> 00:12:47.440
<v Speaker 3>idle in their driveway twenty four hours a day just

230
00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:49.399
<v Speaker 3>in case they get sick, while the rest of the

231
00:12:49.399 --> 00:12:50.759
<v Speaker 3>town pays normal taxes.

232
00:12:51.080 --> 00:12:52.519
<v Speaker 2>It is totally punitive.

233
00:12:52.799 --> 00:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That is a great analogy, But I interpret that dynamic

234
00:12:56.080 --> 00:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>entirely differently. I fiercely defend the curtailment ranking, and I

235
00:13:00.120 --> 00:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>think it echoes a really vital principle articulated by PUC

236
00:13:03.639 --> 00:13:07.799
<v Speaker 1>chairman Steve defranc He said growth should pay for growth.

237
00:13:07.919 --> 00:13:10.120
<v Speaker 2>I agree with the principle, just not the method.

238
00:13:10.399 --> 00:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>But you argue that turning grid costs into a constraint

239
00:13:13.679 --> 00:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>on uptime will make them flee. I argue it is

240
00:13:17.159 --> 00:13:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the exact technical lever required to force hyperscalers to innovate

241
00:13:20.799 --> 00:13:22.519
<v Speaker 1>an energy efficiency.

242
00:13:22.200 --> 00:13:23.519
<v Speaker 2>By threatening their uptime.

243
00:13:23.720 --> 00:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because if they know they are first on the

244
00:13:26.159 --> 00:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>chopping block for curtailment, they are mathematically forced to change

245
00:13:29.600 --> 00:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>their architecture. Okay, how they will build robust on site

246
00:13:33.200 --> 00:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>backup generation right like small modular reactors or geothermal storage.

247
00:13:38.039 --> 00:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>They will invest in advanced cooling systems that draw less

248
00:13:40.639 --> 00:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>power during peak hours, and they'll design more fault tolerant

249
00:13:43.480 --> 00:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>AI training architectures that can actually handle those rolling power adjustments.

250
00:13:47.080 --> 00:13:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Or they will just bypass the headache and build in

251
00:13:49.120 --> 00:13:52.679
<v Speaker 3>Ohio where the legislature offers clear statutory guidance without the

252
00:13:52.759 --> 00:13:54.039
<v Speaker 3>threat of sudden curtailment.

253
00:13:54.159 --> 00:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They can try, but they cannot hide from grid physics

254
00:13:56.600 --> 00:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>forever twenty seven. Other states are currently weighing large load

255
00:14:00.399 --> 00:14:04.519
<v Speaker 1>legislation right now because the grid constraints are completely universal.

256
00:14:04.840 --> 00:14:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Sure the grid is stressed everywhere.

257
00:14:07.080 --> 00:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Look at what happens when a state does not mandate

258
00:14:09.639 --> 00:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>these curtailments and upgrades upfront. If you look at Virginia,

259
00:14:12.759 --> 00:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>which is widely considered the data center capital of the world,

260
00:14:15.840 --> 00:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>forty eight massive projects representing like one hundred and fifty

261
00:14:19.240 --> 00:14:22.799
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars in potential investment were blocked or stalled

262
00:14:22.840 --> 00:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>by intense local opposition just this year.

263
00:14:25.279 --> 00:14:27.279
<v Speaker 2>The pushback there has been huge.

264
00:14:27.399 --> 00:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Right because the citizens realized that data centers were threatening

265
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:35.799
<v Speaker 1>their local grid reliability and driving up their baseline utility rates,

266
00:14:36.039 --> 00:14:39.799
<v Speaker 1>so they were volted at the zoning level. Pennsylvania's contractual

267
00:14:39.840 --> 00:14:43.879
<v Speaker 1>approach preempts that local rebellion by legally ensuring data centers

268
00:14:43.919 --> 00:14:48.159
<v Speaker 1>lose power before households do. The contract secures local consent,

269
00:14:48.679 --> 00:14:52.039
<v Speaker 1>which honestly is the only way these multi billion dollar

270
00:14:52.080 --> 00:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>facilities actually get built in the long term. But that

271
00:14:54.519 --> 00:14:57.279
<v Speaker 1>assumes the premise that executive fiat is the only way

272
00:14:57.360 --> 00:15:00.519
<v Speaker 1>to secure consent. If we agree that growth should pay

273
00:15:00.559 --> 00:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for growth, we should implement that through the legislature. That's

274
00:15:03.639 --> 00:15:07.159
<v Speaker 1>where all stakeholders, the utilities, the tech firms, the consumer

275
00:15:07.200 --> 00:15:11.559
<v Speaker 1>advocates can actually debate the economic impact of that curtailment. Ranking.

276
00:15:12.000 --> 00:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>When an executive order just declares it, it sends a

277
00:15:14.679 --> 00:15:17.679
<v Speaker 1>chilling signal for the capital markets. It sends a signal

278
00:15:17.759 --> 00:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that the state is serious.

279
00:15:19.240 --> 00:15:23.200
<v Speaker 3>It sends a signal of instability. And this local rebellion

280
00:15:23.240 --> 00:15:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned it isn't just about electricity. A massive power

281
00:15:26.559 --> 00:15:30.080
<v Speaker 3>draw is always accompanied by a massive physical footprint that

282
00:15:30.200 --> 00:15:33.679
<v Speaker 3>threatens local natural resources. And this brings us back to

283
00:15:33.720 --> 00:15:36.799
<v Speaker 3>the core issue, which is we need to analyze the

284
00:15:36.960 --> 00:15:41.399
<v Speaker 3>technical requirements on water consumption because this further illustrates the

285
00:15:41.480 --> 00:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>limits of executive authority.

286
00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:45.919
<v Speaker 1>I actually look at the water usage requirements as one

287
00:15:45.960 --> 00:15:49.039
<v Speaker 1>of the areas where the consent order absolutely shines. The

288
00:15:49.039 --> 00:15:53.279
<v Speaker 1>specific disclosure duties mandated by this contract are rigorously detailed.

289
00:15:53.639 --> 00:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Facility operators aren't just giving a vague public relations promise

290
00:15:57.279 --> 00:15:58.919
<v Speaker 1>not to waste local water anymore.

291
00:15:59.320 --> 00:16:02.159
<v Speaker 2>No, they have to provide hard numbers exactly.

292
00:16:02.639 --> 00:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>The contract forces them to report annual energy and natural

293
00:16:05.519 --> 00:16:09.519
<v Speaker 1>gas consumption, estimated average hourly use at peak, total overall

294
00:16:09.559 --> 00:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>water consumption, and crucially, their maximum day demand.

295
00:16:12.840 --> 00:16:16.799
<v Speaker 3>Now, maximum day demand sounds like standard bureaucratic jargon, but

296
00:16:16.919 --> 00:16:20.600
<v Speaker 3>physically it is the most dangerous metric on that paper.

297
00:16:20.840 --> 00:16:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Exactly because we have to look at the thermodynamics of

298
00:16:23.679 --> 00:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>how these facilities operate. Let's break this down for a second.

299
00:16:27.440 --> 00:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Data centers are essentially massive heat generators YEP. To prevent

300
00:16:31.480 --> 00:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the servers from melting, operators frequently rely on evaporative cooling systems,

301
00:16:36.360 --> 00:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>so they pump water over heat exchangers and blow air

302
00:16:39.159 --> 00:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>across them, evaporating the water to reject the heat into

303
00:16:42.360 --> 00:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere.

304
00:16:43.120 --> 00:16:45.639
<v Speaker 2>It's essentially a giant swamp cooler basically.

305
00:16:45.840 --> 00:16:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And on a mild day, their water draw from

306
00:16:48.840 --> 00:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the local municipality is manageable. But on the hottest day

307
00:16:52.840 --> 00:16:55.919
<v Speaker 1>of the year that is the maximum day, the outside

308
00:16:55.919 --> 00:16:59.519
<v Speaker 1>air is already hot, right, so the heat exchange is

309
00:17:00.080 --> 00:17:03.759
<v Speaker 1>radibly inefficient, meaning the system has to work over time

310
00:17:04.039 --> 00:17:07.799
<v Speaker 1>evaporating millions of gallons of water pulling directly from local

311
00:17:07.839 --> 00:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>aquifers or municipal supplies, exactly when the rest of the

312
00:17:10.880 --> 00:17:14.839
<v Speaker 1>town is already facing drought conditions or peak agricultural demand.

313
00:17:15.359 --> 00:17:16.759
<v Speaker 2>It's a perfect storm.

314
00:17:17.079 --> 00:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It is that single day can ruin a local water system.

315
00:17:20.960 --> 00:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>By forcing the disclosure of maximum day demand and by

316
00:17:24.200 --> 00:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>providing a live public map of every proposed project that

317
00:17:27.039 --> 00:17:30.519
<v Speaker 1>has engaged with the DDP, the state forces developers to

318
00:17:30.559 --> 00:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>prove they meet water conservation standards before a single shovel

319
00:17:34.079 --> 00:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>hits the ground. It replaces a reactive regulatory posture with

320
00:17:37.759 --> 00:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a proactive, data driven contract that actually protects public resources.

321
00:17:42.200 --> 00:17:45.319
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's look at the mechanics of what you just described,

322
00:17:45.720 --> 00:17:49.400
<v Speaker 3>because while a live map and reporting requirements sound great

323
00:17:49.440 --> 00:17:53.680
<v Speaker 3>in a press release, they are inherently flimsy compared to hard,

324
00:17:53.880 --> 00:17:58.880
<v Speaker 3>codified legislative financial commitments. How So, let's examine the critique

325
00:17:58.880 --> 00:18:01.799
<v Speaker 3>from Food and Water Wine much they campaign heavily on

326
00:18:01.920 --> 00:18:06.359
<v Speaker 3>protecting local aquifers from exactly the evaporative cooling threat you

327
00:18:06.480 --> 00:18:07.079
<v Speaker 3>just outlined.

328
00:18:07.200 --> 00:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, They are very active in Pennsylvania.

329
00:18:09.160 --> 00:18:12.160
<v Speaker 2>And they called this executive order too little, too late.

330
00:18:12.359 --> 00:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Really?

331
00:18:13.039 --> 00:18:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, why because the highly lucrative sales tax incentive for

332
00:18:17.079 --> 00:18:21.000
<v Speaker 3>data center equipment actually survives this order. The governor is

333
00:18:21.039 --> 00:18:24.799
<v Speaker 3>demanding transparency on maximum day water demand, yes, but the

334
00:18:24.839 --> 00:18:28.880
<v Speaker 3>executive branch is simultaneously handing out massive tax breaks to

335
00:18:28.960 --> 00:18:31.559
<v Speaker 3>the very facilities draining those specific resources.

336
00:18:31.720 --> 00:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I see the contradiction there.

337
00:18:33.279 --> 00:18:36.279
<v Speaker 3>It's a huge contradiction. If we want to look at

338
00:18:36.279 --> 00:18:39.680
<v Speaker 3>how this should actually be done to protect citizens, we

339
00:18:39.759 --> 00:18:43.440
<v Speaker 3>need to look at states passing actual, binding financial laws

340
00:18:43.680 --> 00:18:45.839
<v Speaker 3>that target the economics of the industry.

341
00:18:46.200 --> 00:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so you're referring to the statutory approaches in places

342
00:18:50.000 --> 00:18:52.279
<v Speaker 1>like New Jersey and Virginia precisely.

343
00:18:52.640 --> 00:18:55.319
<v Speaker 3>Let's look at New Jersey. They recently passed the Data

344
00:18:55.359 --> 00:18:59.119
<v Speaker 3>Center Fair Share Act. That is a real debated statute.

345
00:18:59.200 --> 00:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

346
00:18:59.640 --> 00:19:03.920
<v Speaker 3>It legally requires facilities above fifty megawatts to commit to

347
00:19:03.960 --> 00:19:06.839
<v Speaker 3>paying at least eighty five percent of their projected power

348
00:19:06.880 --> 00:19:10.319
<v Speaker 3>costs for a decade. Oh wow, right, that guarantees the

349
00:19:10.400 --> 00:19:13.119
<v Speaker 3>utilities and the taxpayers aren't left holding the bag if

350
00:19:13.160 --> 00:19:16.640
<v Speaker 3>the AI bubble bursts and these facilities go dark. And

351
00:19:16.759 --> 00:19:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Virginia added a hard energy consumption tax of one point

352
00:19:19.720 --> 00:19:21.200
<v Speaker 3>one CeNSE per kilowatt hour.

353
00:19:21.079 --> 00:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Which adds incredibly fast for a data center.

354
00:19:24.200 --> 00:19:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

355
00:19:25.200 --> 00:19:29.799
<v Speaker 3>Those are real, durable financial laws passed by legislatures that

356
00:19:29.880 --> 00:19:34.480
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally alter the economics of resource consumption. A contract based

357
00:19:34.519 --> 00:19:36.880
<v Speaker 3>on a live map, you know, forced onto a developer

358
00:19:36.920 --> 00:19:39.319
<v Speaker 3>by an executive branch that could change hands in twenty

359
00:19:39.319 --> 00:19:43.279
<v Speaker 3>four months. It is simply not a substitute for democratic lawmaking.

360
00:19:43.720 --> 00:19:48.599
<v Speaker 3>It creates a mirage of strict environmental regulation while quietly

361
00:19:48.680 --> 00:19:52.000
<v Speaker 3>maintaining the tax loopholes that incentivize the resource extraction in

362
00:19:52.039 --> 00:19:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the first place.

363
00:19:53.079 --> 00:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I hear you, but I think the flaw in that

364
00:19:55.279 --> 00:19:58.279
<v Speaker 1>reasoning is that you are treating the legislative process as

365
00:19:58.279 --> 00:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>if it operates in a vacuum of perfect efficiency and

366
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>objective debate.

367
00:20:02.640 --> 00:20:04.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not perfect, but it's durable.

368
00:20:04.519 --> 00:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But you mentioned earlier that the Pennsylvania Senate Republicans declined

369
00:20:08.440 --> 00:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to move the grid legislation. We simply do not have

370
00:20:11.799 --> 00:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the luxury of waiting for the perfect legislative consensus while

371
00:20:15.279 --> 00:20:20.039
<v Speaker 1>AI models scale exponentially every few months. The technical requirements

372
00:20:20.039 --> 00:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>embedded in this executive contract, you know, forcing hyperscalers to

373
00:20:23.759 --> 00:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>report pollution mitigation, perform highly accurate load forecasting, and detail

374
00:20:28.160 --> 00:20:33.039
<v Speaker 1>peak water draw those are enforceable right now today, enforceable

375
00:20:33.079 --> 00:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>by who by the dep The dep has real teeth.

376
00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>If a developer violates the terms of the consent order

377
00:20:40.200 --> 00:20:42.759
<v Speaker 1>by pulling more water than agreed upon, the state can

378
00:20:42.799 --> 00:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>halt their operations. Immediately. It is an immediate, practical application

379
00:20:46.759 --> 00:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of state power designed to protect citizens in real time.

380
00:20:50.559 --> 00:20:53.240
<v Speaker 3>It is an application of state power, yes, but it

381
00:20:53.279 --> 00:20:57.559
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally shifts the balance of power from elected lawmakers to

382
00:20:57.759 --> 00:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>unelected bureaucrats at the dep and the Department of Revenue.

383
00:21:01.680 --> 00:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But they are executing the governor's mandate.

384
00:21:04.240 --> 00:21:06.759
<v Speaker 3>Sure, but you are celebrating the fact that the state

385
00:21:06.880 --> 00:21:11.200
<v Speaker 3>is withholding a massive sales tax exemption unless a private

386
00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:15.079
<v Speaker 3>developer signs away their right to grid prioritization. That is

387
00:21:15.119 --> 00:21:19.640
<v Speaker 3>a colossal policy decision. It is deciding who receives power

388
00:21:19.720 --> 00:21:22.599
<v Speaker 3>during a severe winter storm or a summer heat wave

389
00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:25.720
<v Speaker 3>should not be buried in a template agreement drafted by

390
00:21:25.720 --> 00:21:28.960
<v Speaker 3>an executive agency in a back room. That allocation of

391
00:21:28.960 --> 00:21:31.680
<v Speaker 3>critical resources should be debated on the floor of the

392
00:21:31.720 --> 00:21:35.000
<v Speaker 3>House and Senate, where representatives of the actual citizens can

393
00:21:35.079 --> 00:21:35.599
<v Speaker 3>vote on it.

394
00:21:35.839 --> 00:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But the underlying principles of the grid requirements reflect exactly

395
00:21:39.680 --> 00:21:42.759
<v Speaker 1>what those constituents are demanding. I mean, people do not

396
00:21:42.799 --> 00:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>want their communities kept in the dark by NDAs, They

397
00:21:46.240 --> 00:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>do not want their local aquifers drained for server cooling,

398
00:21:49.759 --> 00:21:52.039
<v Speaker 1>and they certainly do not want their monthly power bills

399
00:21:52.079 --> 00:21:54.839
<v Speaker 1>spiking to subsidize a tech giant's new server farm.

400
00:21:55.079 --> 00:21:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Nobody wants that, I agree, right.

401
00:21:57.400 --> 00:21:59.799
<v Speaker 1>So the contract is just the vehicle to deliver the

402
00:21:59.839 --> 00:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>protection the public is overwhelmingly asking for.

403
00:22:03.599 --> 00:22:09.880
<v Speaker 3>Delivering protection via an executive ultimatum establishes a very dangerous precedent. Though,

404
00:22:10.319 --> 00:22:14.000
<v Speaker 3>what happens when a different governor with entirely different political

405
00:22:14.039 --> 00:22:17.920
<v Speaker 3>priorities decides to use this exact same contractual mechanism to

406
00:22:17.960 --> 00:22:19.720
<v Speaker 3>bypass environmental protections.

407
00:22:19.880 --> 00:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a hypothetical risk, but.

408
00:22:21.960 --> 00:22:25.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a real structural risk. If we establish the norm

409
00:22:25.480 --> 00:22:29.440
<v Speaker 3>that contracts can substitute for laws as long as the

410
00:22:29.440 --> 00:22:33.039
<v Speaker 3>state controls the permit file, we are degrading the foundational

411
00:22:33.119 --> 00:22:36.559
<v Speaker 3>rule of law. And from an industry perspective, it makes

412
00:22:36.599 --> 00:22:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Pennsylvania highly precarious for investment. You cannot build a multi

413
00:22:40.920 --> 00:22:44.119
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar AI training facility that requires a ten year

414
00:22:44.160 --> 00:22:47.160
<v Speaker 3>payback period based on an executive order that might just

415
00:22:47.240 --> 00:22:49.039
<v Speaker 3>vanish after the next election cycle.

416
00:22:49.240 --> 00:22:52.799
<v Speaker 1>I really have to disagree that it makes the state uninvestable.

417
00:22:53.200 --> 00:22:58.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes the state predictably responsible. Predictably, yes, predictably.

418
00:22:59.200 --> 00:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>The tech companies building these facilities, these trillion dollar hyper scalers.

419
00:23:03.559 --> 00:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>They are incredibly sophisticated. Governor Shapiro previously championed a twenty

420
00:23:08.839 --> 00:23:12.519
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar Amazon commitment in the state. Right he understands

421
00:23:12.519 --> 00:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>how these companies operate and what they can absorb.

422
00:23:15.039 --> 00:23:16.079
<v Speaker 2>They can absorb a lot.

423
00:23:16.200 --> 00:23:19.559
<v Speaker 1>Yes, as he noted, these companies possess the capital to

424
00:23:19.559 --> 00:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>be good neighbors, to follow the rules, and to build

425
00:23:22.240 --> 00:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sustainable infrastructure. They know that if they try to force

426
00:23:25.200 --> 00:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>their way into a community using NDAs in secret power allocations,

427
00:23:29.279 --> 00:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the eventual zoning backlash and litigation will cost them far

428
00:23:32.519 --> 00:23:35.759
<v Speaker 1>more than simply complying with this consent order. Upfront, the

429
00:23:35.839 --> 00:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>contract provides a clear, albeit strict roadmap to local acceptance.

430
00:23:40.319 --> 00:23:43.839
<v Speaker 3>Recognizing that a trillion dollar company has the capital to

431
00:23:43.920 --> 00:23:48.599
<v Speaker 3>afford infrastructure upgrades and legally mandating those upgrades through an

432
00:23:48.640 --> 00:23:54.119
<v Speaker 3>improper administrative channel. Those are two completely different things. One

433
00:23:54.200 --> 00:23:57.119
<v Speaker 3>is an observation of wealth right, the other is a

434
00:23:57.160 --> 00:23:59.200
<v Speaker 3>circumvention of the legislature.

435
00:23:59.480 --> 00:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>We have on packed a tremendous amount of legal and

436
00:24:02.759 --> 00:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>technical complexity today, and I think we really delivered on

437
00:24:06.359 --> 00:24:10.559
<v Speaker 1>looking at how contracts substitute for new laws and analyzing

438
00:24:10.640 --> 00:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>those technical requirements on water and energy. We definitely covered

439
00:24:14.400 --> 00:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>some ground, so to summarize my position, Pennsylvania has effectively

440
00:24:19.200 --> 00:24:22.880
<v Speaker 1>rewritten the regulatory rule book for the AI era. They

441
00:24:22.880 --> 00:24:27.079
<v Speaker 1>have proven that leveraging existing permitting powers and mandatory technical

442
00:24:27.079 --> 00:24:32.079
<v Speaker 1>contracts regarding water demand, energy forecasting, and grid retailment, that

443
00:24:32.119 --> 00:24:36.799
<v Speaker 1>can outpace sluggish legislatures to protect citizens. By banning NDAs

444
00:24:37.079 --> 00:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and forcing developers to internalize their massive infrastructural costs through

445
00:24:41.279 --> 00:24:44.039
<v Speaker 1>a consent order, I think the state has delivered a

446
00:24:44.079 --> 00:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>pragmatic masterstroke of modern regulation.

447
00:24:46.759 --> 00:24:51.160
<v Speaker 3>And my position remains that regulating multi billion dollar AI

448
00:24:51.279 --> 00:24:57.160
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure via executive ultamada and permit hostage taking it creates

449
00:24:57.200 --> 00:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>a precarious, unpredictable environment. It substitutes true democratic lawmaking with

450
00:25:03.240 --> 00:25:08.319
<v Speaker 3>fragile political contracts. While I absolutely agree that transparency over

451
00:25:08.400 --> 00:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>water and energy use is vital, circumventing the legislature to

452
00:25:12.279 --> 00:25:16.799
<v Speaker 3>imposed draconian curtailment rules and convoluted tax games will only

453
00:25:16.920 --> 00:25:20.599
<v Speaker 3>drive critical infrastructure to other states. It leaves the foundational

454
00:25:20.640 --> 00:25:25.200
<v Speaker 3>issues of grid stability and water management unresolved by actual, durable.

455
00:25:24.839 --> 00:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Law, despite our fundamental disagreement on the mechanism. I think

456
00:25:28.720 --> 00:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>where we do find some profound convergence today, and honestly,

457
00:25:32.519 --> 00:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the source material makes this undeniable is the realization of

458
00:25:36.200 --> 00:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a massive structural shift in the data center industry itself.

459
00:25:40.279 --> 00:25:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh entirely. The core in variable to price into AI

460
00:25:43.640 --> 00:25:48.599
<v Speaker 1>capacity is no longer just land acquisition or cheap baseline power,

461
00:25:48.920 --> 00:25:51.599
<v Speaker 1>or even your queue position with the regional utility.

462
00:25:51.960 --> 00:25:56.079
<v Speaker 3>That is absolutely true. The new core variable is consent

463
00:25:56.640 --> 00:26:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and the mandatory disclosure of technical data, the evaporative cooling

464
00:26:00.920 --> 00:26:04.359
<v Speaker 3>water draw the peak energy use, the grid impact studies.

465
00:26:04.799 --> 00:26:08.079
<v Speaker 3>That is now the absolute baseline required to earn that

466
00:26:08.160 --> 00:26:12.799
<v Speaker 3>local consent. The era of hyperscalers building massive facilities behind

467
00:26:12.839 --> 00:26:16.559
<v Speaker 3>shell companies and in total secrecy is functionally over.

468
00:26:17.119 --> 00:26:21.039
<v Speaker 1>It really is. This is a remarkably complex issue, sitting

469
00:26:21.160 --> 00:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>right at the intersection of cutting edge technology, thermodynamics, and

470
00:26:25.559 --> 00:26:29.119
<v Speaker 1>administrative law. Listeners should keep a close eye on whether

471
00:26:29.160 --> 00:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this Pennsylvania contractual template spreads to other states looking for

472
00:26:32.960 --> 00:26:36.799
<v Speaker 1>a quick regulatory fix, or if it ultimately collapses under

473
00:26:36.839 --> 00:26:40.279
<v Speaker 1>its own lack of statutory permanence as capital flees to

474
00:26:40.359 --> 00:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>friendlier legislative environments.

475
00:26:42.160 --> 00:26:43.960
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be fascinating to watch.

476
00:26:44.599 --> 00:26:46.599
<v Speaker 1>We will leave it to you to weigh the evidence

477
00:26:46.640 --> 00:26:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and decide which path is best. But the next time

478
00:26:49.319 --> 00:26:51.559
<v Speaker 1>you look at an empty lot in your neighborhood, just

479
00:26:51.640 --> 00:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>remember the fight over what gets built there and exactly

480
00:26:54.680 --> 00:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>who gets to know about it is quietly reshaping the

481
00:26:57.400 --> 00:26:59.319
<v Speaker 1>future of the Internet and.

482
00:26:59.279 --> 00:27:00.640
<v Speaker 2>The grid we all rely on.

483
00:27:01.240 --> 00:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us.
