WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.600 --> 00:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>This is not a very spy centric song. This is

2
00:00:05.120 --> 00:00:08.919
<v Speaker 1>like a loud song. I want spy shit, dude, there

3
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we go, there we go. Give me some sixties spy

4
00:00:20.679 --> 00:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff going, give me in the mood, give my vibes. Right,

5
00:00:25.920 --> 00:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying. Now, what I'm saying. Welcome

6
00:00:32.039 --> 00:00:36.799
<v Speaker 1>to another late night stream. Today we're going to focus

7
00:00:36.920 --> 00:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on problems in Protestanism and why Protestantism is false overallhem

8
00:00:46.759 --> 00:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but we will also be welcoming calls from Catholics, Mormons, Charismatics,

9
00:00:53.039 --> 00:00:58.799
<v Speaker 1>you name it. Any group that has various theological positions

10
00:00:58.880 --> 00:01:03.479
<v Speaker 1>is welcome to call in that they take issue with. Right,

11
00:01:06.159 --> 00:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if you feel like you would like to set me straight,

12
00:01:10.159 --> 00:01:15.359
<v Speaker 1>tonight is your knight. You can call it. And yeah,

13
00:01:15.359 --> 00:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>if you want to talk about all the classic issues PSA,

14
00:01:19.760 --> 00:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, we'll let you do it. I will

15
00:01:24.319 --> 00:01:30.239
<v Speaker 1>also kind of intermittently comment on other topics issues clips

16
00:01:30.599 --> 00:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>relevant to today, including Wes huff coming at me right

17
00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>or as I should say, running away, not coming at me,

18
00:01:40.799 --> 00:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>going away from me, because the Protestants as a whole,

19
00:01:50.519 --> 00:01:56.159
<v Speaker 1>it seems, are actually on the run. We've seen both

20
00:01:56.400 --> 00:02:01.079
<v Speaker 1>DAWA and the Roman Catholics sphere pretty much collapse in

21
00:02:01.159 --> 00:02:08.039
<v Speaker 1>terms of their apologetic approach. Dhahwa pretty much died last

22
00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>year when we did the sam Shamun Fresh and Fit

23
00:02:16.599 --> 00:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>debate with Hikikachu and he Jaws. We've not seen any

24
00:02:22.439 --> 00:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>significant debate challenges. Jake's done a few debates. Jake's pretty

25
00:02:26.159 --> 00:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>much the last of the Muslim debaters, and as I predicted,

26
00:02:35.039 --> 00:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Rouslan has run from the debate. Although he admitted four

27
00:02:38.439 --> 00:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>times he wanted to do one, it was willing to

28
00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>do one. Now he demands I publicly apologize to his

29
00:02:46.159 --> 00:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>satisfaction and repent to him. I think Ruslan's got him

30
00:02:52.840 --> 00:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and God mixed up. Like Rouslan seems to think that,

31
00:02:56.840 --> 00:02:59.719
<v Speaker 1>as he named his channel, you can bless God, as

32
00:02:59.800 --> 00:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of Godd needs a blessing or has some lack. Ruslan

33
00:03:02.879 --> 00:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>believes people w need to repent to him. Uh No, dude,

34
00:03:07.800 --> 00:03:11.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you're talking about. Rouselan believes that

35
00:03:12.000 --> 00:03:15.479
<v Speaker 1>people should defer to him. He calls the shots when

36
00:03:15.560 --> 00:03:20.159
<v Speaker 1>it comes to flexing channels, and I don't believe any

37
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:25.039
<v Speaker 1>of it. So I'm an atheist when it comes to Ruslanianism.

38
00:03:25.680 --> 00:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I do not recognize the existence of Ruslan's spiritual auth already.

39
00:03:31.919 --> 00:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So tonight is not mainly Ruslan as a topic, though

40
00:03:35.159 --> 00:03:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk some about everybody's favorite Protestant apologist

41
00:03:41.280 --> 00:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>or what's left of him, who also now will not

42
00:03:43.599 --> 00:03:49.199
<v Speaker 1>debate anyone. He is also removed himself from any debates.

43
00:03:49.280 --> 00:03:50.879
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I don't even really think he did, like

44
00:03:50.879 --> 00:03:55.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe one or two and they weren't even really Maybe

45
00:03:55.319 --> 00:03:56.639
<v Speaker 1>he did more and I'm just not aware of it.

46
00:03:56.680 --> 00:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>But Galvin Orland and his interesting background when it comes

47
00:04:00.319 --> 00:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to his dad, and the relationship to Christianity today, which

48
00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is very sus So we're going to talk

49
00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:09.879
<v Speaker 1>about some of that and the evangelical not just the

50
00:04:09.919 --> 00:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>griff sphere, but the sus sphere. Who is behind these people,

51
00:04:17.839 --> 00:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>who's funding these people? Does Christianity today have that kind

52
00:04:22.839 --> 00:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of fed connection? Of course it does, of course it does.

53
00:04:26.360 --> 00:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna be talking about some of that today.

54
00:04:31.120 --> 00:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>The sort of evangelical mouthpiece of the Pentagon and the

55
00:04:37.279 --> 00:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>CIA establishment, much like we discussed for many, many years,

56
00:04:41.160 --> 00:04:44.639
<v Speaker 1>way before Queen Kwondas did it. We talked about groups

57
00:04:44.839 --> 00:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>like TPUSA or evangelical ministries like Campus Crusade. Essentially being

58
00:04:51.879 --> 00:04:55.759
<v Speaker 1>arms of the military industrial complex. They began actually out

59
00:04:55.759 --> 00:04:57.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Pentagon if you don't know that, that's the

60
00:04:57.480 --> 00:05:02.199
<v Speaker 1>actual history of campus crusade, and a plethora of evangelical

61
00:05:02.680 --> 00:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>groups actually do have a very close connection to cutouts, fronts, etc.

62
00:05:09.480 --> 00:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You saw, for example, all over the news today vindicating myself,

63
00:05:14.560 --> 00:05:17.759
<v Speaker 1>who's talked about this also for over ten years, radical

64
00:05:17.800 --> 00:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>fringe groups right like the neo in groups, the Christian

65
00:05:24.040 --> 00:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>identity groups which were essentially behind Eloheim City and the

66
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh event. We've talked about many cults having connections to

67
00:05:35.040 --> 00:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>intelligence agencies, shady suss funding and lo and behold, turns

68
00:05:41.040 --> 00:05:46.519
<v Speaker 1>out we are vindicated. The allegations of the Department of

69
00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Justice today are that multiple fake right wing entities were

70
00:05:54.720 --> 00:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not just informed with or excuse me, infiltrated with informants,

71
00:05:59.360 --> 00:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but we're actually run by significant amounts of money, including

72
00:06:04.040 --> 00:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in the millions of dollars to a host of fake

73
00:06:07.920 --> 00:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>right wing front groups. In this case, it was not

74
00:06:11.720 --> 00:06:14.439
<v Speaker 1>directly the FBI or the FEDS per se running in

75
00:06:14.480 --> 00:06:17.759
<v Speaker 1>this case, it was the SPLC. Now, the SPLC has

76
00:06:17.839 --> 00:06:22.519
<v Speaker 1>included large backing from George Soros, JP Morgan Chase, George

77
00:06:22.600 --> 00:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Clooney and Open AI. So all of these mega leftist

78
00:06:26.639 --> 00:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>entities have obviously put significant amounts of money over the

79
00:06:29.639 --> 00:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>years into the Southern Poverty Law Center, which has then

80
00:06:33.680 --> 00:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>utilized that money to help fund and control the fake opposition.

81
00:06:39.439 --> 00:06:42.879
<v Speaker 1>We have been saying this actually for twenty years, back

82
00:06:42.879 --> 00:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Big Nine event, because we argued back then

83
00:06:46.439 --> 00:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that the groups that were used, such as al Qaeda,

84
00:06:55.959 --> 00:07:00.439
<v Speaker 1>had a long time Western intelligence relationship and sort of

85
00:07:00.439 --> 00:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>cut out proxy status on record. Same with the nineteen

86
00:07:05.079 --> 00:07:07.759
<v Speaker 1>ninety three event, and with many terror events. Not necessarily

87
00:07:07.879 --> 00:07:12.079
<v Speaker 1>every every event, but in many cases that was the case.

88
00:07:12.439 --> 00:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And now we've seen also explicitly, as I told people

89
00:07:15.120 --> 00:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty seventeen, I would not go to Charlottesville. That

90
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:22.319
<v Speaker 1>would be a massive fed honey trap situation. I told

91
00:07:22.319 --> 00:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>people on live streams at the time not to do it.

92
00:07:25.920 --> 00:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Lo and behold, who's vindicated? I am. I knew what

93
00:07:29.639 --> 00:07:32.079
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about. Do you think I just make

94
00:07:32.160 --> 00:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>these things up. I've been reading about these subjects for

95
00:07:35.720 --> 00:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>over twenty years. All the books that you see behind me,

96
00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not just a set piece. I'm not like Michael

97
00:07:41.759 --> 00:07:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Lofton with a bunch of fake books behind me that

98
00:07:43.439 --> 00:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I've never touched. I actually read the books. You see

99
00:07:45.800 --> 00:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>all the sticky notes. I don't just stick them in

100
00:07:49.160 --> 00:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>there to make it look like i've read them. I

101
00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>read these books, and I have for over twenty years.

102
00:07:56.600 --> 00:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just the domain of co intel and

103
00:08:00.360 --> 00:08:03.319
<v Speaker 1>espionage and all that kind of stuff and geopolitics. I

104
00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>also read the theology books. Those books are also very

105
00:08:06.240 --> 00:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>well read. So that's ultimately why people don't want to

106
00:08:11.199 --> 00:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>come over here and have civil formal debates. It has

107
00:08:14.839 --> 00:08:17.959
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with my jokes or a four letter

108
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>word here and there. That's all ploy that's all smoke

109
00:08:22.079 --> 00:08:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and mirror's excuse. And they know that. They know that

110
00:08:25.040 --> 00:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>because we have organized countless formal civil debates all over

111
00:08:29.959 --> 00:08:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the place with Muslims, with atheists, with cult leaders, et cetera.

112
00:08:34.399 --> 00:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>You name. It very easy to set up a debate,

113
00:08:37.840 --> 00:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not hard. But these are all pearl clutching excuses

114
00:08:42.600 --> 00:08:46.639
<v Speaker 1>to not interact. And I don't care whose channel it's on.

115
00:08:46.759 --> 00:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't have to be on rous Lawn channel. In fact,

116
00:08:49.279 --> 00:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't ever want to go on Rousselann channel. I

117
00:08:51.399 --> 00:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>don't care about Rousselance channel. So I told them I'll

118
00:08:53.840 --> 00:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>debate you on a tiny channel with no followers. That way,

119
00:08:57.320 --> 00:08:59.879
<v Speaker 1>everybody can see that we're not doing it for the click,

120
00:09:00.279 --> 00:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>although I think Ruslan definitely does it for the clicks.

121
00:09:03.080 --> 00:09:06.799
<v Speaker 1>For example, we notice that these people's standards are never

122
00:09:06.879 --> 00:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>applied consistently. When Rouslan said that he will not interact

123
00:09:11.279 --> 00:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with people that are toxic or whatever other such nonsense

124
00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>he said, notice that it doesn't apply to the very

125
00:09:18.000 --> 00:09:19.679
<v Speaker 1>thing he said about me. Though, I only want to

126
00:09:19.679 --> 00:09:23.879
<v Speaker 1>debate people with bigger channels. I just debated Captain Crackrock twice.

127
00:09:24.440 --> 00:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He has a much smaller channel than me. I'm debating

128
00:09:27.120 --> 00:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a Protestant pastor in a couple of weeks who has

129
00:09:29.480 --> 00:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>basically no Internet following. We're doing it all modern day debate.

130
00:09:33.320 --> 00:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So no, I don't just debate people formally with a

131
00:09:37.440 --> 00:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>large following, although everybody in the sphere would like to

132
00:09:40.600 --> 00:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>debate a larger following person because it gives him exposure.

133
00:09:44.240 --> 00:09:47.519
<v Speaker 1>So he's acting like this is some thing unique to

134
00:09:47.639 --> 00:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>just me, And here he is wanting to interact, begging

135
00:09:52.000 --> 00:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for nick flints, attention and clout so that he can

136
00:09:55.360 --> 00:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>get a bigger channel and a bigger presence. Looking at him,

137
00:09:58.879 --> 00:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the very thing he said is all. So he basically

138
00:10:01.320 --> 00:10:04.879
<v Speaker 1>is projecting everything that he does. Is what he accuses

139
00:10:04.879 --> 00:10:08.039
<v Speaker 1>me of because he assumes that we the same, we

140
00:10:08.120 --> 00:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>get the same mind fram we ain't the same.

141
00:10:10.080 --> 00:10:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Son.

142
00:10:10.960 --> 00:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about your flex and I don't care

143
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>about your channel.

144
00:10:14.279 --> 00:10:17.559
<v Speaker 3>But it's interesting that our audiences overlap. But I'm here

145
00:10:17.600 --> 00:10:19.080
<v Speaker 3>for it. I'm here for it. As long as long

146
00:10:19.080 --> 00:10:21.279
<v Speaker 3>as he's willing to have a conversation, I'm here for it.

147
00:10:21.279 --> 00:10:23.320
<v Speaker 3>I got I got no, I got no gripes with

148
00:10:24.360 --> 00:10:26.519
<v Speaker 3>having a conversation with him. But it's it's interesting that

149
00:10:26.559 --> 00:10:27.039
<v Speaker 3>our audience.

150
00:10:27.080 --> 00:10:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, those audiences don't overlap. What the hell are

151
00:10:29.519 --> 00:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? That audience ain't watching your dumb ass

152
00:10:33.039 --> 00:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>What are you talking about? Nonsense? Yeah, Rouselm is a narcissist.

153
00:10:37.600 --> 00:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna show you his stupid ass churches, his fake

154
00:10:39.879 --> 00:10:43.279
<v Speaker 1>business churches. Sermon. Remember bragging about his sermons the other day?

155
00:10:43.679 --> 00:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>You realize, so just preached like three sermons of my church.

156
00:10:46.600 --> 00:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>So you realize I've just preached sermons as if anybody

157
00:10:49.320 --> 00:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>cares about your stupid sermons, as if we're impressed by that.

158
00:10:52.360 --> 00:10:58.039
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh dude, was that business church, and he was sermonize,

159
00:10:58.039 --> 00:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>oh shit, I better back down. I better showed this.

160
00:11:00.840 --> 00:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll put I better put some respect on this man.

161
00:11:04.279 --> 00:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Now his actual church, which he publicly says for you people,

162
00:11:08.720 --> 00:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he's dog should to be dogs. He publicly talks about

163
00:11:11.080 --> 00:11:13.399
<v Speaker 1>his church on his podcast. He mentioned in his last

164
00:11:13.440 --> 00:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>video people probably didn't catch it because it's such a

165
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:18.799
<v Speaker 1>stupid ass name for a church. You probably thought he

166
00:11:18.879 --> 00:11:22.279
<v Speaker 1>was talking about his R and B group or his

167
00:11:22.480 --> 00:11:26.279
<v Speaker 1>hip hop group when he said, I go to Rhythm Church. Yes,

168
00:11:26.440 --> 00:11:28.799
<v Speaker 1>that's right, it's called Rhythm Church. You can't make this

169
00:11:28.960 --> 00:11:35.639
<v Speaker 1>up based around lame ass beats. So here he is

170
00:11:36.440 --> 00:11:39.399
<v Speaker 1>at Rhythm Church. He preaching up there to Rhythm Church.

171
00:11:39.480 --> 00:11:39.679
<v Speaker 4>Doll.

172
00:11:42.000 --> 00:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I like how Rhythm Church, by the way, has a podium,

173
00:11:46.440 --> 00:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>an ugly ass damn corporate style chair, a computer and

174
00:11:51.600 --> 00:11:54.519
<v Speaker 1>that's it. But they also put a little bit of

175
00:11:55.120 --> 00:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>image free stained glass windows to make it look churchy.

176
00:11:58.759 --> 00:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Do hey, look, this looked too much like an AMN lecture.

177
00:12:01.879 --> 00:12:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Hall put a little bit of stained glass up in

178
00:12:04.879 --> 00:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>here to make it a little bit of churchy. Yes,

179
00:12:07.600 --> 00:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it's called Rhythm Church. You can't make this up. Okay,

180
00:12:10.399 --> 00:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is what rus lines right, he was. This

181
00:12:14.159 --> 00:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is what he was all bragging about. Do flexing. You realize,

182
00:12:17.720 --> 00:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>well just preached three times looking about church, right, you

183
00:12:20.399 --> 00:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>realize I am a preacher. I'm not joking. To check

184
00:12:24.159 --> 00:12:29.039
<v Speaker 1>this out. Let's see this. Let's see this awesome mad

185
00:12:29.159 --> 00:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>cap sermonizing.

186
00:12:31.320 --> 00:12:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Right.

187
00:12:31.480 --> 00:12:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Hell, all right, one more time. Give it up for

188
00:12:36.399 --> 00:12:38.679
<v Speaker 5>the amazing worship team.

189
00:12:38.879 --> 00:12:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Everybody who so dudes preaching wearing a T shirt for

190
00:12:42.679 --> 00:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>his book. And you're trying to tell me it's not

191
00:12:45.559 --> 00:12:51.799
<v Speaker 1>business church now, he said, imagine the apostles thinking of

192
00:12:51.840 --> 00:12:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the Orthodox Church was the true church. The Apostles and

193
00:12:55.720 --> 00:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>their church looks nothing like the accretions of the Orthodox Church.

194
00:12:59.639 --> 00:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Roussel It says, Meanwhile, Rouse line, God, a damn uh

195
00:13:04.879 --> 00:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like a a damn factory worker back there on

196
00:13:09.399 --> 00:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>bass guitar. We got a we got a farm boy

197
00:13:14.080 --> 00:13:19.639
<v Speaker 1>back there on bass guitar. Rooselin's got a a T

198
00:13:19.799 --> 00:13:29.200
<v Speaker 1>shirt for his book doing sermons now. Clearly, Rhythm and

199
00:13:29.240 --> 00:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Blues R and B Church. Clearly R and B Church

200
00:13:32.360 --> 00:13:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is what the Apostles had in mind. You're trying to

201
00:13:35.679 --> 00:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>tell me Peter wasn't over there busting it down like

202
00:13:39.440 --> 00:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Prince right. You tell me Peter wasn't over there doing

203
00:13:45.360 --> 00:13:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of I'll be sure you tell me

204
00:13:48.879 --> 00:13:54.919
<v Speaker 1>that the Apostles didn't set up Rhythm Church. So the

205
00:13:55.039 --> 00:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>dude calling us out of line with the post Apostolic

206
00:13:59.120 --> 00:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>fathers the first century goes to rapper Rhythm Church and

207
00:14:05.679 --> 00:14:10.279
<v Speaker 1>wears t shirts about his book up on a stage,

208
00:14:11.279 --> 00:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>no altar, a stage. Yes, that's clearly the true shirt.

209
00:14:17.440 --> 00:14:19.039
<v Speaker 4>It's serving behind the scenes.

210
00:14:19.120 --> 00:14:22.519
<v Speaker 5>So how many guys know where we've been parked in

211
00:14:22.559 --> 00:14:24.799
<v Speaker 5>the last years, all of twenty twenty five?

212
00:14:24.799 --> 00:14:27.759
<v Speaker 4>What book have we've been in? That's right? And I

213
00:14:27.799 --> 00:14:28.639
<v Speaker 4>was looking.

214
00:14:28.639 --> 00:14:32.360
<v Speaker 5>At last week at what was talked about in Acts

215
00:14:32.399 --> 00:14:34.200
<v Speaker 5>this week, and I said, Jeff, this is this is

216
00:14:34.240 --> 00:14:34.679
<v Speaker 5>really good.

217
00:14:34.679 --> 00:14:36.080
<v Speaker 4>I want to I want to preach this part.

218
00:14:36.200 --> 00:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh he going back to the origins of the church

219
00:14:38.279 --> 00:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>br the Book of Acts. Right. Let me ask you

220
00:14:43.360 --> 00:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a question, Roseline, Where in the Book of Acts do

221
00:14:47.480 --> 00:14:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you see a bass guitar? Where do you see a stage?

222
00:14:54.720 --> 00:15:02.279
<v Speaker 1>This man up on stage, this is the grifter over

223
00:15:02.320 --> 00:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>here trying to say that we aren't Apostolic and this

224
00:15:07.279 --> 00:15:09.919
<v Speaker 1>is the church his his dumb ass is at And

225
00:15:10.000 --> 00:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Jeff said, now, bro, oh, look they do have a

226
00:15:12.720 --> 00:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>stained glass that does have an image. Okay. I was

227
00:15:15.720 --> 00:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>getting a little nervous because I was like, they just

228
00:15:18.399 --> 00:15:22.159
<v Speaker 1>got stained pretty colors. Well they got one image. Okay,

229
00:15:22.159 --> 00:15:23.879
<v Speaker 1>so we're at least not iconoclast.

230
00:15:25.320 --> 00:15:29.000
<v Speaker 5>I got this. I want it for myself. I said,

231
00:15:29.039 --> 00:15:31.480
<v Speaker 5>all right, so we're gonna do something fun. We're gonna

232
00:15:31.480 --> 00:15:34.360
<v Speaker 5>we're actually gonna Last week, do you remember where where

233
00:15:34.360 --> 00:15:35.360
<v Speaker 5>Paul was an action?

234
00:15:36.159 --> 00:15:36.559
<v Speaker 4>Where was he?

235
00:15:36.840 --> 00:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he went over to Rhythm Church. Paul went over there.

236
00:15:39.720 --> 00:15:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Punks pod people don't know. Paul was a damn beat boxer.

237
00:15:43.480 --> 00:15:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Paul could be box at best with the best of them.

238
00:15:57.279 --> 00:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Gospel Church, Gospels Church, That's what the Apostles was up to.

239
00:16:07.120 --> 00:16:11.360
<v Speaker 5>Son traveling through the church in ephsis So we're gonna.

240
00:16:11.120 --> 00:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Spile in the book of CS. Let me ask you

241
00:16:14.320 --> 00:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a courtion.

242
00:16:15.519 --> 00:16:20.200
<v Speaker 5>Stay in Ephesians today, and we're gonna talk about something

243
00:16:20.240 --> 00:16:21.720
<v Speaker 5>that I think is so relevant. So if you turn

244
00:16:21.759 --> 00:16:24.360
<v Speaker 5>your bibles to Ephesians chapter one with me.

245
00:16:24.879 --> 00:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Why they got sadass piano music playing while he talking.

246
00:16:31.639 --> 00:16:34.919
<v Speaker 1>I ain't going on somebody's low ass number stream. I

247
00:16:34.919 --> 00:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>ain't going on his dumb stream. Those people can call

248
00:16:37.879 --> 00:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in here I'm not going on a two hundred one

249
00:16:42.720 --> 00:16:47.279
<v Speaker 1>subscribers stream. Why are you wasting my time?

250
00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:49.399
<v Speaker 4>Then?

251
00:16:49.440 --> 00:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Boys? Is all in the orbit? Then a bunch of

252
00:16:53.360 --> 00:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>gay orbiters of roost lines. You think I'm gonna go

253
00:16:57.279 --> 00:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>on gay orbiter rouse lines people's stream. No, they can

254
00:17:01.000 --> 00:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>come over here. By the way, I'm doing them a

255
00:17:03.399 --> 00:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>favor because all they want is a clip farm. All

256
00:17:06.200 --> 00:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they wants attention them dummy stream about me every two weeks.

257
00:17:11.400 --> 00:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So no, I'm not giving them what they want. But

258
00:17:13.000 --> 00:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>although I will give them what they want because they

259
00:17:14.359 --> 00:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>can come over here and they can call in and

260
00:17:17.960 --> 00:17:19.799
<v Speaker 1>they can get their dumb clips. That's all they do.

261
00:17:20.319 --> 00:17:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Y'all not realize that people just want clips. You think

262
00:17:24.359 --> 00:17:29.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm scared that dude called in. I asked him to

263
00:17:29.079 --> 00:17:32.279
<v Speaker 1>call in and debate me on Intercession of the Saints,

264
00:17:32.319 --> 00:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and he did so. How am I scared? You're about

265
00:17:36.400 --> 00:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to just get booty. You're wasting everybody's huh, y'all are

266
00:17:38.960 --> 00:17:40.799
<v Speaker 1>just scared because I'm making fun of your dumb cult

267
00:17:40.880 --> 00:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>leader ruse Line r u Se ruse Line and his

268
00:17:46.160 --> 00:17:49.519
<v Speaker 1>dumb uh Rhythm and Blue R and B.

269
00:17:49.720 --> 00:17:56.880
<v Speaker 5>Church Ephesians, Chapter one, Chapter one, Verse three, I'm reading

270
00:17:56.880 --> 00:17:57.519
<v Speaker 5>out of the NIV.

271
00:17:57.640 --> 00:18:00.200
<v Speaker 4>It says, Oh, praise be to.

272
00:18:00.160 --> 00:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Be over there in the n IV. He over there

273
00:18:02.960 --> 00:18:05.319
<v Speaker 1>in that n I b right. He ain't got the

274
00:18:05.400 --> 00:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>KGB Bible. He ain't got the KGV Bible. He got

275
00:18:10.119 --> 00:18:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the NIB Bible. Yo. You got the NIB, bro, you

276
00:18:14.920 --> 00:18:18.319
<v Speaker 1>got that Pigeon Bible, or you got a e Bonics Bible.

277
00:18:19.000 --> 00:18:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Yo.

278
00:18:19.240 --> 00:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to send Ruslana e Bonics Bible.

279
00:18:22.759 --> 00:18:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Then maybe his dumba ass could read it.

280
00:18:24.799 --> 00:18:29.000
<v Speaker 5>God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has

281
00:18:29.119 --> 00:18:32.920
<v Speaker 5>blessed us in the heavenly realms with Averyka.

282
00:18:33.079 --> 00:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'm not doing a performative, fake ass prayer. We've done.

283
00:18:38.680 --> 00:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Get that gay crap out of my face, dude, with

284
00:18:41.359 --> 00:18:43.839
<v Speaker 1>this performative prayer. I wish I had known all this

285
00:18:44.000 --> 00:18:52.279
<v Speaker 1>before I even went on his cringe ass podcast. Also

286
00:18:52.839 --> 00:18:56.559
<v Speaker 1>to change the subject to get over here to the calls.

287
00:18:57.160 --> 00:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We did have some. I had a couple people reaching

288
00:19:00.480 --> 00:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>out to Doug Wilson. I didn't do it. It's another person

289
00:19:03.960 --> 00:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that organized an event with me a year ago, and

290
00:19:09.119 --> 00:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>he's reached out to Doug Wilson, he says in multiple

291
00:19:12.039 --> 00:19:17.079
<v Speaker 1>emails and Originally there was a planned potential discussion and debate.

292
00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:20.759
<v Speaker 1>It started, I want to say, maybe six months ago,

293
00:19:21.000 --> 00:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and I was busy at the time, and I said,

294
00:19:23.319 --> 00:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>why don't we see if you could get you know,

295
00:19:25.319 --> 00:19:27.279
<v Speaker 1>father Deacon to do it. I've got a little bit

296
00:19:27.319 --> 00:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>too much going on right now to do a debate

297
00:19:29.480 --> 00:19:33.759
<v Speaker 1>with Doug Wilson, although we did also try in that

298
00:19:33.880 --> 00:19:36.759
<v Speaker 1>three way debate with me and Tim Gordon and the

299
00:19:36.799 --> 00:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Lower Lodge dude. Originally the Protestant was going to be

300
00:19:39.960 --> 00:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Doug Wilson, but I don't know if he canceled or

301
00:19:42.720 --> 00:19:45.039
<v Speaker 1>just didn't want to do it, or they just never

302
00:19:45.079 --> 00:19:49.279
<v Speaker 1>got into say, But then it turned into a potential

303
00:19:49.319 --> 00:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>other debate with FDA that never came to fruition. So

304
00:19:54.079 --> 00:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I told the guy, I said, hey, Tingu says, I

305
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>sent you a message on picture app to my Instagram. Uh, basically,

306
00:20:10.000 --> 00:20:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to say that I'm grateful and for you

307
00:20:12.359 --> 00:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing me back to the faith after running from it.

308
00:20:14.759 --> 00:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>If you read my message, I greatly be appreciated. God

309
00:20:17.160 --> 00:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>bless you all.

310
00:20:17.680 --> 00:20:17.799
<v Speaker 6>Well.

311
00:20:17.839 --> 00:20:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Tingu. He sends a big old fat Hunters

312
00:20:21.759 --> 00:20:23.799
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dollars superch. I appreciate it. I didn't know

313
00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:28.079
<v Speaker 1>that you can't say the word instagram. That's odd. I

314
00:20:28.160 --> 00:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't know, crash Meta says. When Rouselan was asked about

315
00:20:35.359 --> 00:20:37.319
<v Speaker 1>why he won't debate Jay but he would talk to

316
00:20:37.400 --> 00:20:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Nick Flints, he says, because Nick Quintus is a pagan.

317
00:20:40.759 --> 00:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Rouselan is just insane, dude. This dude is just cra

318
00:20:43.559 --> 00:20:46.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, none of the shit he says actually even

319
00:20:46.559 --> 00:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>makes it. I figured out that, Like, there's no point

320
00:20:49.200 --> 00:20:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in even trying to make sense of what Rouselan's thinking

321
00:20:51.839 --> 00:20:54.519
<v Speaker 1>is saying. I think he's just crashed out for real,

322
00:20:54.839 --> 00:20:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Like I think there's something else going on. I mean,

323
00:20:57.319 --> 00:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to overuse this term crash out. I think

324
00:21:00.440 --> 00:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>something weird is going on with Rusalom. I don't know

325
00:21:03.519 --> 00:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>since their Hypocrette says, step aside Apostolic Church, we got

326
00:21:07.480 --> 00:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Rhythm Church up in here, boy, That's what I'm saying.

327
00:21:10.599 --> 00:21:13.519
<v Speaker 1>How do we know the original Apostolic Church wasn't Rhythm church?

328
00:21:14.160 --> 00:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you prove it wasn't exactly exactly? You can't? Can you? There?

329
00:21:18.920 --> 00:21:22.599
<v Speaker 1>We go? Of course you can, But I'm being silly.

330
00:21:23.319 --> 00:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the dude that has the gumption

331
00:21:26.799 --> 00:21:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to talk about how we are the ones that departed

332
00:21:30.319 --> 00:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>from the early church. Dude that goes to damn rhythm

333
00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and blues church. Wait, Walter Schmidt, what's up? I'm mute,

334
00:21:55.920 --> 00:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Walter Schmidt. I'm mute.

335
00:21:58.559 --> 00:22:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, j Yeah, how do I sound? Can you tell me?

336
00:22:03.480 --> 00:22:05.279
<v Speaker 1>You sound sexy and amazing?

337
00:22:06.480 --> 00:22:07.400
<v Speaker 2>That's good to hear it.

338
00:22:07.440 --> 00:22:09.799
<v Speaker 7>The thing is, I want to do spaces myself and

339
00:22:10.680 --> 00:22:12.000
<v Speaker 7>I'm kind of figuring.

340
00:22:11.680 --> 00:22:15.200
<v Speaker 2>This stuff out with the equipment. But yeah, I just

341
00:22:15.240 --> 00:22:18.319
<v Speaker 2>wanted to say hi. I'm I'm I don't really want

342
00:22:18.359 --> 00:22:21.759
<v Speaker 2>to debate you. I pretty much agree with everything you say.

343
00:22:22.599 --> 00:22:25.000
<v Speaker 7>Okay, Yeah, stuff with Rustlin is crazy.

344
00:22:25.599 --> 00:22:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad that it finally is coming out.

345
00:22:27.960 --> 00:22:31.160
<v Speaker 8>I never really watched him, but that guy is really weird.

346
00:22:32.039 --> 00:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>It's something it's it's something weird going on for sure.

347
00:22:35.160 --> 00:22:35.440
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

348
00:22:35.680 --> 00:22:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, but yeah, I just wanted to say hi.

349
00:22:41.119 --> 00:22:46.759
<v Speaker 9>And you know, it's really interesting to see how well the.

350
00:22:46.799 --> 00:22:49.480
<v Speaker 10>Different spirit in the Orthodox.

351
00:22:49.119 --> 00:22:53.559
<v Speaker 11>Apologetics, the Catholic apologetics, the Protestant apologetics, the Muslims.

352
00:22:54.720 --> 00:22:56.880
<v Speaker 12>The Orthodox are the only one that have like a

353
00:22:57.240 --> 00:23:01.119
<v Speaker 12>warrior spirit, like never liked ever.

354
00:23:01.440 --> 00:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, all the other ones are gay. The rest

355
00:23:03.640 --> 00:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of them are gay. They even are. I mean, the

356
00:23:05.920 --> 00:23:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Proston churches are pretty much all gay.

357
00:23:09.160 --> 00:23:12.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean literally, even I saw what happened with

358
00:23:12.480 --> 00:23:13.359
<v Speaker 7>you and Nick frent Is.

359
00:23:13.359 --> 00:23:15.079
<v Speaker 2>It's such a shame. I mean, you had a great

360
00:23:15.160 --> 00:23:17.920
<v Speaker 2>debate back then, and I watched it a couple of

361
00:23:18.000 --> 00:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>years ago, and I thought it was very interesting. I mean,

362
00:23:21.759 --> 00:23:24.480
<v Speaker 2>it was very cordial on both sides.

363
00:23:24.519 --> 00:23:29.039
<v Speaker 13>But now he's like scared and I like Nick flint Is,

364
00:23:29.119 --> 00:23:30.880
<v Speaker 13>He's like an interesting guy.

365
00:23:31.000 --> 00:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>He's he's pushing the boundaries all that.

366
00:23:34.480 --> 00:23:37.640
<v Speaker 12>But it's such a shame that he just doesn't want

367
00:23:37.680 --> 00:23:39.720
<v Speaker 12>to interact with you.

368
00:23:39.920 --> 00:23:40.119
<v Speaker 4>Well.

369
00:23:40.200 --> 00:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Nick said the other day on one of

370
00:23:42.960 --> 00:23:46.599
<v Speaker 1>his streams, I just saw the clip that Vatican two

371
00:23:46.720 --> 00:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>did go off the rails. So that's really just admitting

372
00:23:50.920 --> 00:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing I've been trying to convey to him for

373
00:23:52.759 --> 00:23:59.640
<v Speaker 1>ten years. So, Bruce, what's up? Thank you for that call?

374
00:23:59.720 --> 00:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Dog said it. Bruce, how you doing? Go ahead? What's up?

375
00:24:08.519 --> 00:24:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

376
00:24:08.720 --> 00:24:08.880
<v Speaker 14>Man?

377
00:24:09.079 --> 00:24:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I really been listening to a lot.

378
00:24:10.359 --> 00:24:11.440
<v Speaker 15>Re release really.

379
00:24:11.240 --> 00:24:12.599
<v Speaker 2>Helped me out with a lot of things.

380
00:24:12.680 --> 00:24:15.440
<v Speaker 8>I'm a Protestant right now, but I'm trying to figure

381
00:24:15.480 --> 00:24:16.759
<v Speaker 8>out there's two things.

382
00:24:16.960 --> 00:24:20.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what's more interesting to you. I've said

383
00:24:20.160 --> 00:24:20.799
<v Speaker 2>a union people.

384
00:24:20.839 --> 00:24:24.279
<v Speaker 8>So to share Toeman or pre subpositional apologetics and the

385
00:24:24.359 --> 00:24:26.160
<v Speaker 8>Canon scripture, which one's more.

386
00:24:26.000 --> 00:24:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Interesting to you?

387
00:24:27.160 --> 00:24:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Either one is fine, all right, So.

388
00:24:29.319 --> 00:24:31.799
<v Speaker 8>Let's first talk about like the Cannon descripture and pre

389
00:24:31.839 --> 00:24:35.400
<v Speaker 8>substantional apologetics. Why do you think it is, like you're

390
00:24:35.599 --> 00:24:37.880
<v Speaker 8>you're a student of Boston Seminary and.

391
00:24:37.880 --> 00:24:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Obviously well read on Van Hill, right, Well, why do

392
00:24:40.559 --> 00:24:41.759
<v Speaker 2>you think it is that they missed this?

393
00:24:43.960 --> 00:24:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, there are several reasons. I mean, they were not,

394
00:24:48.279 --> 00:24:54.039
<v Speaker 1>to my knowledge, even familiar with anything from Orthodox Christian

395
00:24:54.079 --> 00:24:57.039
<v Speaker 1>theology at all. It's really only been in this last

396
00:24:57.359 --> 00:25:01.559
<v Speaker 1>several years that you know, Orthodox christianities theology presidence has

397
00:25:01.640 --> 00:25:05.599
<v Speaker 1>even been kind of out there. I mean one of

398
00:25:05.599 --> 00:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the first books was in the two thousands, right where

399
00:25:09.960 --> 00:25:14.759
<v Speaker 1>you had I forget that guy's names, Daniel McClellan or

400
00:25:14.839 --> 00:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>mcmc something, and he wrote a book about Orthodox pros

401
00:25:19.160 --> 00:25:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and Catholic views and he was like an evangelical guy.

402
00:25:21.839 --> 00:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>And that was in the early mid two thousands, and

403
00:25:24.400 --> 00:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of one of the first books that

404
00:25:26.200 --> 00:25:29.559
<v Speaker 1>even exposed a lot of people in the West. So

405
00:25:29.880 --> 00:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Bonson dying in the late nineties or whatever, and Van

406
00:25:32.480 --> 00:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>till earlier than that. I mean, they just weren't even

407
00:25:34.880 --> 00:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the in the stale.

408
00:25:37.400 --> 00:25:40.519
<v Speaker 8>Logical problem here with regard to the lens by which

409
00:25:40.559 --> 00:25:44.880
<v Speaker 8>they you'll effectively get caught by begging the question using

410
00:25:44.880 --> 00:25:46.880
<v Speaker 8>the scripture that I'm able to justify the use of

411
00:25:46.920 --> 00:25:48.160
<v Speaker 8>the scripture in the first.

412
00:25:47.920 --> 00:25:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Place, Well, it's I mean, they're the ones that pioneered

413
00:25:53.559 --> 00:25:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it's an argument for an entire paradigm.

414
00:25:57.000 --> 00:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you're going to go that line of argument,

415
00:25:59.000 --> 00:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>then the paradigm needs to make sense. It can't just be,

416
00:26:03.319 --> 00:26:06.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, something grounded in a book. It's got to

417
00:26:06.799 --> 00:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>be more than that, because the book itself comes from

418
00:26:10.240 --> 00:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a paradigm, from a miliu, from a community. So I

419
00:26:13.240 --> 00:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>think that they missed, for example, there's certain metaphysical implications

420
00:26:18.839 --> 00:26:21.079
<v Speaker 1>that go along with TAG that relate to the Trinity.

421
00:26:21.200 --> 00:26:22.839
<v Speaker 1>That's something that I pushed quite a bit of the

422
00:26:22.880 --> 00:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>last ten years. So in other words, you could say

423
00:26:26.759 --> 00:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that they worked in trans in augmentation. But if their

424
00:26:29.160 --> 00:26:34.119
<v Speaker 1>conception of the deity was sufficiently heterodox and wrong, then

425
00:26:34.160 --> 00:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the argument is only going to go so far. If

426
00:26:36.000 --> 00:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you're saying that the Christian God is the foundation of morals, ethics,

427
00:26:41.480 --> 00:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and metaphysics, a human morals, bismology, metaphysics, So you better

428
00:26:45.240 --> 00:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>have the right doctrine of God. So I think, combined

429
00:26:48.240 --> 00:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with other Reformation distinctives like the doctrine told depravity and

430
00:26:54.279 --> 00:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's you know, perpetual noetic effects of sin that

431
00:26:57.279 --> 00:27:01.039
<v Speaker 1>constantly sort of put you in a a spiral of

432
00:27:01.079 --> 00:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>never having the type of certitude the tag allegedly is

433
00:27:04.000 --> 00:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>supposed to give you. People highlighting and bringing these points

434
00:27:07.200 --> 00:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to the four for many many years, which were ignored.

435
00:27:10.200 --> 00:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>For example, I highlighted, I highlighted a lot of these

436
00:27:12.480 --> 00:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>arguments and points to John Frame and to Douglas Jones

437
00:27:16.119 --> 00:27:18.519
<v Speaker 1>from the Wilson circles years ago, and a lot of

438
00:27:18.519 --> 00:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>those people would just try to ignore it. So again

439
00:27:21.519 --> 00:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's many things going on. Also, Protestantism is

440
00:27:24.920 --> 00:27:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a form of prelust. It's a it's a situation where

441
00:27:28.480 --> 00:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you you, you are the real arbiter of everything and

442
00:27:32.720 --> 00:27:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you're the one that decides over everyone else. And although

443
00:27:35.960 --> 00:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it claims that it's scripture, it's not. It's really you

444
00:27:38.759 --> 00:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and scripture and you're the final arbiter.

445
00:27:42.200 --> 00:27:44.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's been the problem I've been coming up against

446
00:27:44.599 --> 00:27:47.240
<v Speaker 2>as well, and thanks for that man.

447
00:27:47.480 --> 00:27:50.240
<v Speaker 8>And so going forwards, the PSA issue at stake an

448
00:27:50.279 --> 00:27:53.680
<v Speaker 8>issue I feel like there's either a semantic issue or

449
00:27:53.720 --> 00:27:57.240
<v Speaker 8>a literal theological issue where it seems as though people

450
00:27:57.279 --> 00:28:00.799
<v Speaker 8>that are proponents of substitutionaryatment.

451
00:27:59.839 --> 00:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Are creating a third category of Christ.

452
00:28:03.119 --> 00:28:05.599
<v Speaker 8>I don't know if that makes sense, but they're basically

453
00:28:05.640 --> 00:28:08.319
<v Speaker 8>saying that he doesn't actually have the same nature we have,

454
00:28:08.839 --> 00:28:11.519
<v Speaker 8>and therefore he can't be a substitute because his nature

455
00:28:11.599 --> 00:28:14.759
<v Speaker 8>is without sin, but ours is the noetic effects of sin.

456
00:28:15.160 --> 00:28:17.680
<v Speaker 8>And so I don't see how that's an actual substitute

457
00:28:17.880 --> 00:28:21.680
<v Speaker 8>if indeed he is a substitute, and he must be

458
00:28:21.839 --> 00:28:24.200
<v Speaker 8>the same as us in some sense, at least the

459
00:28:24.279 --> 00:28:25.640
<v Speaker 8>human side of his nature.

460
00:28:26.039 --> 00:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, there's multiple problems, multiple problems going on there. First

461
00:28:30.240 --> 00:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of all, I'm not heard of Protestant saying this. I'm

462
00:28:33.000 --> 00:28:36.559
<v Speaker 1>not saying that they haven't said that, but usually and

463
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>usually they say that Christ does have the same nature

464
00:28:39.000 --> 00:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as us, and that's why he's able to, you know,

465
00:28:43.079 --> 00:28:46.519
<v Speaker 1>to die in our place as a substitute. But the

466
00:28:46.599 --> 00:28:51.039
<v Speaker 1>fact that he assumes a sinless human nature doesn't mean

467
00:28:51.039 --> 00:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's not the same nature as ours, because sin

468
00:28:52.960 --> 00:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't something that's Sin isn't a nature, And that's another

469
00:28:55.799 --> 00:28:59.279
<v Speaker 1>mistake Protestants make. Sin is a deprivation of grace or

470
00:28:59.279 --> 00:29:01.359
<v Speaker 1>an act of a will against the good. It's not

471
00:29:01.400 --> 00:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a state of being. It's not an ontological status. So

472
00:29:04.759 --> 00:29:07.079
<v Speaker 1>they're actually being Manichean if they think that sin has

473
00:29:07.079 --> 00:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>ontological existence or evil has existence.

474
00:29:10.319 --> 00:29:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it doesn't fit together.

475
00:29:11.680 --> 00:29:16.960
<v Speaker 8>Well if they say that man's nature is indeed painted entirely.

476
00:29:17.000 --> 00:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's Manichein. That would be Manichean. That we mean

477
00:29:19.680 --> 00:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>God creates evil natures, which doesn't make sense because evil

478
00:29:23.000 --> 00:29:27.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a nature. Evil is a privation or a

479
00:29:27.480 --> 00:29:32.559
<v Speaker 1>predatory act against nature. So for us, evil is the

480
00:29:32.599 --> 00:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>act of the will against the good. It's not a

481
00:29:34.680 --> 00:29:37.799
<v Speaker 1>thing that has being or substance. But they collapse nature

482
00:29:37.799 --> 00:29:39.839
<v Speaker 1>into person. So that's how they get the idea that

483
00:29:39.880 --> 00:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>we're all damned and atom because our whole nature is

484
00:29:43.200 --> 00:29:48.319
<v Speaker 1>quote a sin nature that is inherently guilty of sin,

485
00:29:48.559 --> 00:29:51.119
<v Speaker 1>because we're children of atom. That's why they think infants

486
00:29:51.119 --> 00:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are damned. That we don't believe them, So then.

487
00:29:54.160 --> 00:29:56.759
<v Speaker 8>You don't adhere to the doctrine of original sin, at

488
00:29:56.799 --> 00:29:58.240
<v Speaker 8>least you wouldn't articulate it that way.

489
00:29:58.240 --> 00:30:00.079
<v Speaker 2>What you call it ancestral then.

490
00:30:00.400 --> 00:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's to distinguish between the deprivation that results from

491
00:30:04.880 --> 00:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Adam's sin, whereby we are deprived of grace. That's not

492
00:30:08.279 --> 00:30:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as having actual guilt, which you accrue

493
00:30:13.279 --> 00:30:16.759
<v Speaker 1>when you commit a sin. So infants don't commit actual

494
00:30:16.839 --> 00:30:18.799
<v Speaker 1>sins because they don't have the use of their reasoning

495
00:30:18.799 --> 00:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to act against God's will. That's why James says that

496
00:30:21.880 --> 00:30:25.039
<v Speaker 1>sin when it gives birth and it is assented to,

497
00:30:26.519 --> 00:30:29.319
<v Speaker 1>he says evil when it is when it gives birth,

498
00:30:29.359 --> 00:30:31.279
<v Speaker 1>when it times with the passions and the concupis sense,

499
00:30:31.720 --> 00:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>when it's assented to it, he says it's a sin.

500
00:30:34.000 --> 00:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So he actually specifies that it's not the desires that

501
00:30:37.200 --> 00:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>themselves are the sin. It's the assent of the will

502
00:30:40.079 --> 00:30:46.759
<v Speaker 1>to an illicit or disordered desire. And what Protestants do

503
00:30:46.920 --> 00:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and have done since the Reformation, due to a misunderstanding

504
00:30:50.480 --> 00:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of Romans five, is that they think that our nature

505
00:30:53.720 --> 00:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>itself is a sin, and they think it's a state

506
00:30:56.279 --> 00:30:58.319
<v Speaker 1>of being, But it can't be a state of being

507
00:30:58.359 --> 00:30:59.359
<v Speaker 1>when it's a deprivation.

508
00:31:01.720 --> 00:31:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they've gotten the power totally wrong.

509
00:31:05.599 --> 00:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>That and there is no real ontology and Protestantism correct.

510
00:31:09.359 --> 00:31:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

511
00:31:10.359 --> 00:31:13.359
<v Speaker 8>So as far as like book recommendations might go for

512
00:31:13.519 --> 00:31:16.119
<v Speaker 8>this particular issue with regards to the Union, what might

513
00:31:16.160 --> 00:31:20.359
<v Speaker 8>you recommend outside of course like no Chalcedonian Council and

514
00:31:20.440 --> 00:31:22.240
<v Speaker 8>canons or you know the story.

515
00:31:22.319 --> 00:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I can tell you exactly what you need to read.

516
00:31:23.720 --> 00:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>You need to read uh st Cyril of Alexandria and

517
00:31:26.240 --> 00:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Christological Controversy because when I read that book and

518
00:31:29.000 --> 00:31:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I understood that Jesus is a divine subject and that

519
00:31:31.880 --> 00:31:34.759
<v Speaker 1>there's no human hypostasis in Christ, it led me to

520
00:31:34.880 --> 00:31:39.079
<v Speaker 1>understand fully why there could never be a PSA.

521
00:31:40.720 --> 00:31:43.119
<v Speaker 2>This seems to me to like undercut the entire the

522
00:31:43.279 --> 00:31:44.039
<v Speaker 2>entire West.

523
00:31:44.200 --> 00:31:47.799
<v Speaker 1>If that's true, probably, I mean it doesn't just begin

524
00:31:47.880 --> 00:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with you know, Lutheran Calvin. Uh it goes back to

525
00:31:50.640 --> 00:31:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Anselm and satisfaction theory.

526
00:31:52.480 --> 00:31:55.519
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, yeah, the legal theory as well, all

527
00:31:55.640 --> 00:31:56.400
<v Speaker 2>that sort of work.

528
00:31:57.119 --> 00:31:58.599
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely well.

529
00:31:58.720 --> 00:32:01.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, thanks a lot, Jamen, that's the luck to you.

530
00:32:01.519 --> 00:32:02.640
<v Speaker 8>I appreciate all that you do.

531
00:32:02.839 --> 00:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, anytime. Also, I would say there's another side accessory

532
00:32:07.000 --> 00:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>book that would help. That's good and that's written by

533
00:32:08.920 --> 00:32:14.039
<v Speaker 1>a Lutheran guy, and it's called Harvest of Medieval Theology

534
00:32:14.799 --> 00:32:19.319
<v Speaker 1>from Gabriel Auckham, Akham and Bile to Luther ific at

535
00:32:19.319 --> 00:32:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the exec title. But he's a Lutheran who wrote about

536
00:32:21.839 --> 00:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you have to be a nominalist philosophically

537
00:32:25.279 --> 00:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to have Luther's doctrine of justification in PSA. And if

538
00:32:30.400 --> 00:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you can point out that successfully that I think you can,

539
00:32:36.160 --> 00:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that the ancient and medieval world or the ancient and

540
00:32:39.680 --> 00:32:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Patristic world was not nominalist, then that means that Luther's

541
00:32:44.359 --> 00:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>doctrine is impossible in the first one thousand years of Christianity.

542
00:32:51.000 --> 00:32:53.680
<v Speaker 2>I think Luther is just an obnstadium monk, right, So

543
00:32:53.920 --> 00:32:54.759
<v Speaker 2>how did he be wrong?

544
00:32:57.000 --> 00:32:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, I know you're joking, but I mean,

545
00:33:01.880 --> 00:33:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even if I'm just saying, even if we

546
00:33:03.400 --> 00:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>granted that Luther was right in some of the critiques

547
00:33:06.400 --> 00:33:10.599
<v Speaker 1>of Rome, it's like, yeah, but what But if Luther's

548
00:33:10.960 --> 00:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>argument of how we are changing from a state of

549
00:33:14.920 --> 00:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>divine wrath to a legal state of divine grace, if

550
00:33:18.440 --> 00:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's dispositional, that requires a certain philosophical framework called nominalism,

551
00:33:23.160 --> 00:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>which divorces the essence of things from the names given

552
00:33:27.039 --> 00:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to them. And so Luther made use of Oakham and

553
00:33:29.480 --> 00:33:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel Bile to figure out how God could call someone

554
00:33:33.240 --> 00:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>righteous when they're in fact an actuality wicked, and he

555
00:33:36.480 --> 00:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>uses nominalism in the philosophical system. According to Haiko Oberman,

556
00:33:39.559 --> 00:33:42.799
<v Speaker 1>very famous Lutheran scholar and historian to say that this

557
00:33:42.880 --> 00:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is how Luther did it. He uses this systemic approach. Now,

558
00:33:47.480 --> 00:33:49.839
<v Speaker 1>if nobody in the first thousand years a Christianity was

559
00:33:49.880 --> 00:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a nominalist, which is what's required for a purely legal

560
00:33:54.039 --> 00:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>status justification, then we know that Paul, Saint Paul in

561
00:33:59.680 --> 00:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the Church Fathers aren't teaching anything like Luther. Yeah, yeah, that.

562
00:34:04.240 --> 00:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Seems to the.

563
00:34:06.480 --> 00:34:06.720
<v Speaker 16>Well.

564
00:34:06.720 --> 00:34:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Thanks a lot, man, I really appreciate it.

565
00:34:08.199 --> 00:34:11.079
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Yeah, keep keep reading and keep searching. You you're

566
00:34:11.119 --> 00:34:16.559
<v Speaker 1>on your way to orthodoxy. Robotic, what's up? No, I'm

567
00:34:16.559 --> 00:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>not going on his channel, so stop asking me. I'm

568
00:34:21.480 --> 00:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>talking to the chat robot, you know what I mean. Oh, yes, sir, Hey,

569
00:34:26.400 --> 00:34:30.559
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. I'm can you speak up a

570
00:34:30.559 --> 00:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I can barely hear you speaking to the mic.

571
00:34:33.400 --> 00:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry, can you hear me there now a little bit?

572
00:34:37.280 --> 00:34:37.400
<v Speaker 14>Uh?

573
00:34:37.719 --> 00:34:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, shoot.

574
00:34:39.679 --> 00:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just talk into the to the mic, dude, you

575
00:34:44.440 --> 00:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>hear me?

576
00:34:44.800 --> 00:34:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Now?

577
00:34:46.239 --> 00:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll try go ahead at that.

578
00:34:50.559 --> 00:34:52.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm I'm.

579
00:34:52.480 --> 00:34:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Not the folks you were talking about. And I can't

580
00:34:58.199 --> 00:35:00.199
<v Speaker 1>even hear you. Dude, I don't know what what kind

581
00:35:00.199 --> 00:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of a micro are you using? Dude?

582
00:35:02.320 --> 00:35:07.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like my boozy earphones.

583
00:35:07.400 --> 00:35:08.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry.

584
00:35:08.280 --> 00:35:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Let me Uh, I might have a bit.

585
00:35:10.480 --> 00:35:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I can hear you a little better now, but you

586
00:35:12.199 --> 00:35:14.119
<v Speaker 1>just need to talk directly into the mic. We can

587
00:35:14.119 --> 00:35:18.639
<v Speaker 1>barely hear you, all right, Sorry about that. Well, now

588
00:35:18.639 --> 00:35:22.760
<v Speaker 1>you're far away and I can't hear you. So yeah,

589
00:35:22.760 --> 00:35:25.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what's happened, and I really am not really.

590
00:35:26.400 --> 00:35:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Shoot.

591
00:35:26.920 --> 00:35:28.639
<v Speaker 9>Uh can you hear me?

592
00:35:28.719 --> 00:35:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Now?

593
00:35:29.679 --> 00:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll try. Oh yeah, I'm.

594
00:35:35.079 --> 00:35:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Protestant. I listened to a lot of the

595
00:35:37.440 --> 00:35:38.280
<v Speaker 2>content at the shore.

596
00:35:39.280 --> 00:35:43.480
<v Speaker 17>Think it's really good, and I'm honestly.

597
00:35:43.280 --> 00:35:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Just trying to.

598
00:35:45.239 --> 00:35:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't. I'm sorry, man, I can't hear you.

599
00:35:47.119 --> 00:35:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Try to get to a good mic. It's just we

600
00:35:48.719 --> 00:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>can't even hear you. You're there and then you're gone

601
00:35:51.480 --> 00:35:55.039
<v Speaker 1>for like five seconds and then you're back. So try

602
00:35:55.039 --> 00:35:57.079
<v Speaker 1>to find a good mic. No, I'm not going to

603
00:35:57.119 --> 00:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>some randos fifty person in live stream? Why would I

604
00:36:01.480 --> 00:36:04.599
<v Speaker 1>do that? I'm doing my live stream. I'm not If

605
00:36:04.599 --> 00:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>they want a clip farm, they can come be on

606
00:36:06.760 --> 00:36:10.760
<v Speaker 1>this stream. Smokey, what's up? Stop asking me? Or I'm

607
00:36:10.760 --> 00:36:18.079
<v Speaker 1>just going to boo you smoky?

608
00:36:18.880 --> 00:36:20.239
<v Speaker 18>Yes, that's try.

609
00:36:22.079 --> 00:36:24.679
<v Speaker 1>How's it going, good man? What's on your mind?

610
00:36:25.480 --> 00:36:28.079
<v Speaker 18>Good I just wanted to see if you would give

611
00:36:28.119 --> 00:36:30.880
<v Speaker 18>me just less than sixty seconds to present an argument

612
00:36:31.239 --> 00:36:33.639
<v Speaker 18>to justify going and having a chat with Moler.

613
00:36:35.360 --> 00:36:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Well you want the debate about me going to his stream?

614
00:36:38.880 --> 00:36:41.079
<v Speaker 18>Well, not a debate, just to presenting an argument.

615
00:36:41.119 --> 00:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you're presenting an argument, that's a debate. What

616
00:36:43.960 --> 00:36:46.199
<v Speaker 1>if you're presenting an argument, then that's part of a debate.

617
00:36:46.320 --> 00:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's right. If they want to dude, if they

618
00:36:50.960 --> 00:36:52.639
<v Speaker 1>want to clip, if they want a clip farm, they

619
00:36:52.639 --> 00:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>can just hop on here right now.

620
00:36:55.039 --> 00:36:58.159
<v Speaker 18>Well yeah, but I mean, Jay, that's that's not really

621
00:36:58.159 --> 00:36:59.000
<v Speaker 18>fair what they want to do.

622
00:36:59.039 --> 00:36:59.719
<v Speaker 2>And you're the king of.

623
00:36:59.719 --> 00:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Clip Why is that not from channels.

624
00:37:01.599 --> 00:37:03.519
<v Speaker 18>To do that for you? So, I mean you know

625
00:37:03.559 --> 00:37:05.840
<v Speaker 18>it's all a clip farm. It all grows a brand, right.

626
00:37:06.679 --> 00:37:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Oh So now now you know the motives and I'm

627
00:37:09.280 --> 00:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>just clip for me.

628
00:37:11.079 --> 00:37:14.119
<v Speaker 18>Well, I mean, you do encourage channels to build off

629
00:37:14.159 --> 00:37:16.079
<v Speaker 18>of clips of things that you've done in the past,

630
00:37:16.119 --> 00:37:17.440
<v Speaker 18>and debates and things like that.

631
00:37:17.599 --> 00:37:19.639
<v Speaker 2>I know you do that for a reason.

632
00:37:19.440 --> 00:37:21.280
<v Speaker 18>Because you like to get your name out there and

633
00:37:21.320 --> 00:37:23.760
<v Speaker 18>your interactions so people can see your talents and your

634
00:37:23.840 --> 00:37:24.400
<v Speaker 18>numbers grow.

635
00:37:24.679 --> 00:37:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not faulting you for it. It's playing the game.

636
00:37:27.280 --> 00:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And did I fault them? I said, if they want

637
00:37:29.039 --> 00:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a clip farm, they can come over here.

638
00:37:31.559 --> 00:37:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, I understand that.

639
00:37:33.119 --> 00:37:35.280
<v Speaker 18>It's just I don't understand why you wouldn't want to

640
00:37:35.280 --> 00:37:37.320
<v Speaker 18>go ahead and expose yourself to their audience.

641
00:37:37.360 --> 00:37:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Concurrently, I've already been already.

642
00:37:40.440 --> 00:37:43.000
<v Speaker 18>I've already why you wouldn't just want to do that,

643
00:37:43.079 --> 00:37:45.480
<v Speaker 18>and they promised they wouldn't mute you at all.

644
00:37:45.559 --> 00:37:46.639
<v Speaker 2>Would you give them.

645
00:37:46.440 --> 00:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>The same part implying that I'm going.

646
00:37:48.320 --> 00:37:50.280
<v Speaker 18>To go on over and he'll give you a piece

647
00:37:50.280 --> 00:37:50.639
<v Speaker 18>of Spaci.

648
00:37:50.880 --> 00:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Get out of here. Shut up, you're not you're talking

649
00:37:53.840 --> 00:37:55.199
<v Speaker 1>over me. No, I'm not going to go over there

650
00:37:55.239 --> 00:37:57.280
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want to go over there. And I

651
00:37:57.360 --> 00:38:00.760
<v Speaker 1>already had the debate with them and they did it

652
00:38:00.800 --> 00:38:03.039
<v Speaker 1>on there. There's no reason why they can't call in

653
00:38:03.079 --> 00:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>here and also stream it on their thing. The same

654
00:38:07.519 --> 00:38:10.800
<v Speaker 1>thing applies to them, Goober. If they want to call in,

655
00:38:12.519 --> 00:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>they can call in on their phone and they can

656
00:38:15.400 --> 00:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>continue live streaming do like I'm doing in ghetto style.

657
00:38:18.440 --> 00:38:21.159
<v Speaker 1>They can hold the phone up to the freaking microphone

658
00:38:21.840 --> 00:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't have. I'm not going to hook up the

659
00:38:23.400 --> 00:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>stream yard and then hook all of that up into obs.

660
00:38:26.480 --> 00:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just not doing all that. I'm doing my stream

661
00:38:28.760 --> 00:38:32.039
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not giving these dudes. I don't respect these dudes.

662
00:38:33.000 --> 00:38:37.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm not giving them the attention that they want on

663
00:38:37.199 --> 00:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>their channels. But they can clip anything they want and

664
00:38:40.440 --> 00:38:44.679
<v Speaker 1>they can call in here and continue their stupid stream. Errol,

665
00:38:44.719 --> 00:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>what's up? No, it's not the movie review mall or

666
00:38:47.920 --> 00:38:50.519
<v Speaker 1>it's a dude that nobody even follows. It's these are

667
00:38:51.039 --> 00:38:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the lowest tier protests are They're worst things that need God.

668
00:38:55.320 --> 00:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>This is all this is is that they want to

669
00:38:56.960 --> 00:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why they stream about me every week. And they're

670
00:39:02.079 --> 00:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>rouse Lin's bought buddies, so they want to come on.

671
00:39:04.159 --> 00:39:07.079
<v Speaker 1>They want to make a big stint get attention. That's

672
00:39:07.079 --> 00:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>why I'm not doing it. Errol, what's up, hey, j

673
00:39:11.440 --> 00:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>how's it going? That was up?

674
00:39:15.039 --> 00:39:15.280
<v Speaker 18>Yeah?

675
00:39:15.360 --> 00:39:20.320
<v Speaker 19>I just want to call I really been appreciate your content.

676
00:39:20.360 --> 00:39:23.400
<v Speaker 19>That actually kind of brought me back into being a

677
00:39:23.440 --> 00:39:27.800
<v Speaker 19>Christian gunn from being a former atheist, in no small

678
00:39:27.840 --> 00:39:31.559
<v Speaker 19>part due to your tag formulation. I just wanted to

679
00:39:31.599 --> 00:39:33.840
<v Speaker 19>run a quick question on the argument by you.

680
00:39:34.199 --> 00:39:38.199
<v Speaker 2>Okay, sure, so as I understand it, it's.

681
00:39:38.159 --> 00:39:41.880
<v Speaker 19>Kind of an important premise is the impossibility of the

682
00:39:41.880 --> 00:39:44.199
<v Speaker 19>contrary world view?

683
00:39:44.639 --> 00:39:46.880
<v Speaker 2>My question is if you.

684
00:39:47.519 --> 00:39:53.280
<v Speaker 19>Consider something like platonism, so so say the atheist just

685
00:39:53.280 --> 00:39:59.079
<v Speaker 19>assumes things like logic or the existence of the external world,

686
00:40:00.159 --> 00:40:04.239
<v Speaker 19>or the past, all the different transcendental categories as brute facts,

687
00:40:05.880 --> 00:40:07.039
<v Speaker 19>why would why?

688
00:40:07.119 --> 00:40:08.079
<v Speaker 2>Why is that?

689
00:40:08.639 --> 00:40:10.559
<v Speaker 19>Why can't they do that? I guess why is that

690
00:40:10.840 --> 00:40:14.400
<v Speaker 19>impossible for them to do? The way I think about is,

691
00:40:14.679 --> 00:40:18.679
<v Speaker 19>you know, a divine mind is a more parsimonious explanation

692
00:40:18.760 --> 00:40:22.599
<v Speaker 19>because they're all interrelated transcendental categories. But why is it,

693
00:40:23.239 --> 00:40:26.559
<v Speaker 19>you know, necessarily wrong for the atheists to just, you know,

694
00:40:27.280 --> 00:40:30.719
<v Speaker 19>assume all these like this grab bag of brute facts.

695
00:40:32.599 --> 00:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, just assuming a grab bag of

696
00:40:35.800 --> 00:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>brute facts wouldn't respond to the objections that tag makes.

697
00:40:40.320 --> 00:40:43.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're not just giving a negative impossibility. The

698
00:40:43.199 --> 00:40:47.639
<v Speaker 1>contract critique we're also presenting a positive list of our

699
00:40:47.719 --> 00:40:50.519
<v Speaker 1>beliefs in our worldview that includes a bunch of metaphysical

700
00:40:50.639 --> 00:40:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and ethical and historical ideas. So there's two world views

701
00:40:54.119 --> 00:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that are in comparison and that are being contrasted in

702
00:40:57.800 --> 00:41:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the argument. So brute assertions don't give us any kind

703
00:41:02.280 --> 00:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of explanatory power justification. If they can put forward brute

704
00:41:06.440 --> 00:41:09.119
<v Speaker 1>facts in a debate, then so can you. So just

705
00:41:09.199 --> 00:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>saying that there's all these things therefore that's my basis.

706
00:41:12.559 --> 00:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't tell me that I ought to believe those

707
00:41:14.360 --> 00:41:16.320
<v Speaker 1>things or why those things are true. That's just saying

708
00:41:16.320 --> 00:41:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that they are that you're just asserting things. So in

709
00:41:18.320 --> 00:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the same way just saying well, I'm a platonist or whatever, like,

710
00:41:22.960 --> 00:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>there's so many problems in platonism in terms of basic

711
00:41:26.960 --> 00:41:29.760
<v Speaker 1>level contradictions. And you can go look up the critiques

712
00:41:29.760 --> 00:41:33.079
<v Speaker 1>that we've done a platonism that for an atheist. By

713
00:41:33.119 --> 00:41:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the way, how could atheist be a platonist? Right? Like

714
00:41:35.159 --> 00:41:38.519
<v Speaker 1>an atheist atheists aren't platonists typically there could be one,

715
00:41:38.599 --> 00:41:43.639
<v Speaker 1>I suppose, But now he's going to switch from being

716
00:41:43.639 --> 00:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>an atheist as saying, well, but there's all these immaterial

717
00:41:45.920 --> 00:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>forms well, in Plato's conception, the immaterial forms really don't

718
00:41:50.239 --> 00:41:53.519
<v Speaker 1>have or it's very difficult for him to explain what's

719
00:41:53.559 --> 00:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in common between the immaterial eternal ideal form and the

720
00:41:58.360 --> 00:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>material changing tempore things that the forms, the things that

721
00:42:04.039 --> 00:42:07.639
<v Speaker 1>are copied from the forms. Right, So there's a dialectical

722
00:42:07.679 --> 00:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>tension between the realm of ideas and perfect stasis versus

723
00:42:12.519 --> 00:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the realm of flux and change. So just saying that

724
00:42:19.519 --> 00:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't justify it. It's not an argument to just assert that,

725
00:42:22.400 --> 00:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to just say that, well, what if it's brute facts,

726
00:42:25.360 --> 00:42:27.039
<v Speaker 1>then if they do that, you can say, okay, well

727
00:42:27.079 --> 00:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>then God's a brute fact. So like you have to understand,

728
00:42:30.360 --> 00:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>like in a debate, people have if they can do that,

729
00:42:33.800 --> 00:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>you can do that.

730
00:42:34.320 --> 00:42:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Right.

731
00:42:34.480 --> 00:42:37.639
<v Speaker 1>That's why fallacies matter. It's pointing out what you what

732
00:42:37.679 --> 00:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't do. It's like we're playing chess and somebody

733
00:42:40.320 --> 00:42:42.320
<v Speaker 1>just knocks over all the piece and says I win. Well,

734
00:42:42.320 --> 00:42:43.800
<v Speaker 1>then I can knock all over all the piece and

735
00:42:43.840 --> 00:42:46.800
<v Speaker 1>say I win. It's it's it's defeats the whole purpose

736
00:42:46.840 --> 00:42:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of a debate. Hank, what's up.

737
00:42:50.719 --> 00:42:50.920
<v Speaker 2>There?

738
00:42:50.960 --> 00:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>These people are not even they're they're not debaters. Did

739
00:42:53.880 --> 00:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>These are like low tier need god level people who

740
00:42:57.000 --> 00:43:00.199
<v Speaker 1>are just looking for some attention because they're in these

741
00:43:00.480 --> 00:43:04.039
<v Speaker 1>here and they try to are. They stream about me

742
00:43:04.079 --> 00:43:08.039
<v Speaker 1>every week, bitching and complaining, pearl collectioning about four letter words.

743
00:43:08.199 --> 00:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>It's the lowest tier stuff.

744
00:43:09.239 --> 00:43:09.360
<v Speaker 15>Man.

745
00:43:09.360 --> 00:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>You guys are not even You're not missing anything. And

746
00:43:13.519 --> 00:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>they're never gonna call in because they can't act. They

747
00:43:15.719 --> 00:43:23.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything. What's up, man, Hank, Hank, what's up?

748
00:43:28.719 --> 00:43:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And all I hit their dumb audience coming over here,

749
00:43:30.800 --> 00:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to bait me to come over. I'm not going

750
00:43:32.239 --> 00:43:32.639
<v Speaker 1>over there.

751
00:43:35.840 --> 00:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Jake, can you hear me?

752
00:43:38.159 --> 00:43:40.079
<v Speaker 20>Hey man, It's been a while since I called in.

753
00:43:40.199 --> 00:43:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I've been busy.

754
00:43:41.000 --> 00:43:45.599
<v Speaker 20>I've been getting ready for my tour and my album's dropping. Dude,

755
00:43:45.920 --> 00:43:47.320
<v Speaker 20>I just wanted to say, Man, I just want to

756
00:43:47.320 --> 00:43:51.199
<v Speaker 20>call and say I finally found a un orthodox church

757
00:43:51.280 --> 00:43:55.440
<v Speaker 20>man that you know. I've been attending, man, and it's

758
00:43:55.480 --> 00:43:56.880
<v Speaker 20>all been things to guys like you, man.

759
00:43:56.920 --> 00:43:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So I just want to call and say.

760
00:43:58.639 --> 00:44:01.519
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, man, God Blas, thank you appreciate that. I

761
00:44:01.559 --> 00:44:03.599
<v Speaker 1>thought he was joking. I thought you meant like you

762
00:44:03.599 --> 00:44:06.519
<v Speaker 1>you were, you were pretending that you were like Ruslawn.

763
00:44:06.639 --> 00:44:12.000
<v Speaker 1>But I appreciate it. Yeah, okay, I oh you were joking. Okay,

764
00:44:12.119 --> 00:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>never appreciate that, man, Hank. What's up, dude, dude? These

765
00:44:19.000 --> 00:44:21.880
<v Speaker 1>people are there. It's I'm telling you man, they're just

766
00:44:21.960 --> 00:44:26.679
<v Speaker 1>coming up with drama to get attention. They couldn't. They

767
00:44:26.679 --> 00:44:29.199
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't last five minutes in a real discussion. We already

768
00:44:29.199 --> 00:44:32.320
<v Speaker 1>debated them. We had a forty minute debate on the

769
00:44:32.320 --> 00:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Intercession of the Saints with him a year ago. I'm

770
00:44:36.960 --> 00:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>not going on their dumb stream yard stream. They can

771
00:44:38.880 --> 00:44:41.119
<v Speaker 1>call in here and they can keep streaming, and they

772
00:44:41.119 --> 00:44:44.199
<v Speaker 1>can clip it all they want. I don't care. I'm

773
00:44:44.199 --> 00:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to end my stream and go on their stream.

774
00:44:45.840 --> 00:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Mandlson, what's up? Go ahead?

775
00:45:01.199 --> 00:45:06.679
<v Speaker 2>Okay? I have a question from a local Orthodox church.

776
00:45:07.280 --> 00:45:09.519
<v Speaker 9>How would I were are some key signs to know

777
00:45:09.679 --> 00:45:14.239
<v Speaker 9>that they're engaging in.

778
00:45:12.480 --> 00:45:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Any level of pedadoxy I guess.

779
00:45:19.800 --> 00:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the key signs would be like, are they

780
00:45:21.880 --> 00:45:24.880
<v Speaker 1>teaching a humanism? Are they teaching pro gay stuff? Are

781
00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>they teaching I mean, are they teaching anything that's against

782
00:45:28.639 --> 00:45:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the creed or basic Christian morals? Usually

783
00:45:33.119 --> 00:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't, you know, these kinds of groups don't just

784
00:45:35.360 --> 00:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>begin with something like we believe a pollinarianism, and we

785
00:45:38.440 --> 00:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that Christ is fully human. That they're not

786
00:45:40.480 --> 00:45:43.599
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it that way. They're gonna, you know, act

787
00:45:43.719 --> 00:45:47.360
<v Speaker 1>like there's nothing wrong with being skittles, you know, that

788
00:45:47.440 --> 00:45:49.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. So, I mean, that's usually the things

789
00:45:49.599 --> 00:45:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that fall first, and then you get the heresies to

790
00:45:53.320 --> 00:46:01.920
<v Speaker 1>back that up. Ortho, what's up? Yeah, it's funny how

791
00:46:01.920 --> 00:46:06.199
<v Speaker 1>no Protestants will even call in a debate anymore, nor

792
00:46:06.239 --> 00:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>will the Muslims. What's up?

793
00:46:07.480 --> 00:46:07.639
<v Speaker 14>Man?

794
00:46:08.159 --> 00:46:12.599
<v Speaker 1>We're telling you, what's up? My man?

795
00:46:13.320 --> 00:46:17.840
<v Speaker 7>I think I know exactly why those Protestants don't want.

796
00:46:17.679 --> 00:46:20.400
<v Speaker 1>To debate you, okay, was that they're racist. They don't

797
00:46:20.400 --> 00:46:21.440
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to a black man.

798
00:46:22.400 --> 00:46:23.159
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying.

799
00:46:23.400 --> 00:46:27.960
<v Speaker 17>And exactly because and I showed what you truly looked

800
00:46:27.960 --> 00:46:28.960
<v Speaker 17>like as a black man.

801
00:46:29.159 --> 00:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just scared of you for showing they prejudiced. Right,

802
00:46:32.400 --> 00:46:35.320
<v Speaker 1>these white boys, these white boys over here, is prejudice

803
00:46:35.320 --> 00:46:38.519
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to a real bipop queen. They want

804
00:46:38.559 --> 00:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to play games with all these uh, you know, all

805
00:46:42.920 --> 00:46:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of these phone e mcs. What's up? Uh, yuppie, appreciate that.

806
00:46:49.840 --> 00:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate that Hello, Yeah, can you hear me?

807
00:46:59.400 --> 00:46:59.639
<v Speaker 2>All right?

808
00:46:59.760 --> 00:47:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

809
00:47:00.079 --> 00:47:02.079
<v Speaker 2>Are cool? Man?

810
00:47:02.519 --> 00:47:04.079
<v Speaker 12>I just kind of wanted to come on and say

811
00:47:04.119 --> 00:47:07.239
<v Speaker 12>thanks man for the content that you make, because a.

812
00:47:07.159 --> 00:47:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Lot of it is really eye opening.

813
00:47:08.960 --> 00:47:11.840
<v Speaker 12>So I'm a Roman Catholic and I have been for

814
00:47:12.000 --> 00:47:17.599
<v Speaker 12>probably I don't know, eight issu years now, and a

815
00:47:17.639 --> 00:47:19.440
<v Speaker 12>lot of the stuff on the papacy they kind of

816
00:47:19.480 --> 00:47:23.039
<v Speaker 12>don't really they don't really teach you the primary sources

817
00:47:23.559 --> 00:47:25.039
<v Speaker 12>when you're getting into this stuff, you.

818
00:47:24.960 --> 00:47:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Know, yeah, I know I went through that, yeah.

819
00:47:28.400 --> 00:47:32.280
<v Speaker 12>Man, So it's like having an identity crisis over here,

820
00:47:32.360 --> 00:47:37.039
<v Speaker 12>you know. And I just kind of wanted to ask, like, when.

821
00:47:36.840 --> 00:47:38.559
<v Speaker 2>You were a Roman Catholic and you were.

822
00:47:38.440 --> 00:47:45.639
<v Speaker 12>First getting these little sprinkles and bits of contradictions and

823
00:47:45.880 --> 00:47:48.840
<v Speaker 12>like you know, Vatican One and Vatican two and actually

824
00:47:48.840 --> 00:47:52.159
<v Speaker 12>reading the primary sources, Like, how did that make you feel?

825
00:47:52.440 --> 00:47:53.079
<v Speaker 2>You know what? I mean?

826
00:47:56.280 --> 00:48:02.599
<v Speaker 1>It was difficult. It was challenging. It was you know,

827
00:48:02.719 --> 00:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>paradigm shift shifting. I mean it was you know, because

828
00:48:07.000 --> 00:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I was very serious about rob falsism. I was into

829
00:48:10.000 --> 00:48:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Catholic apologetics. I was serious about driving hours to go

830
00:48:14.519 --> 00:48:18.239
<v Speaker 1>to Latin mass I mean it was it was hard. Uh,

831
00:48:18.360 --> 00:48:22.239
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't easy, but leaving it was best decision ever made.

832
00:48:22.440 --> 00:48:23.519
<v Speaker 1>I would never go back to that.

833
00:48:25.079 --> 00:48:28.519
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean it's I'm trying to get there, you know,

834
00:48:28.639 --> 00:48:31.360
<v Speaker 12>like I'm having trouble sort of letting go.

835
00:48:33.360 --> 00:48:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Man, Like, what are the are you? Is it like

836
00:48:35.679 --> 00:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>part of your heritage and culture usually just that kind

837
00:48:38.360 --> 00:48:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of stuff.

838
00:48:39.599 --> 00:48:44.199
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is, so, I actually was.

839
00:48:44.519 --> 00:48:47.639
<v Speaker 12>You know, I had like a break in my family

840
00:48:47.719 --> 00:48:50.639
<v Speaker 12>from the Catholic Church, from my like through my parents

841
00:48:51.320 --> 00:48:55.000
<v Speaker 12>because they were Protestants, but like, our heritage is TechEd

842
00:48:55.000 --> 00:48:59.239
<v Speaker 12>Italian primarily, so you know, all of our ancestors and stuff.

843
00:48:58.960 --> 00:49:02.639
<v Speaker 2>Were Catholic, so it is like a cultural thing.

844
00:49:02.679 --> 00:49:04.880
<v Speaker 12>You know, our grandparents all that, we grew up with

845
00:49:05.440 --> 00:49:06.239
<v Speaker 12>them being Catholic.

846
00:49:06.400 --> 00:49:09.000
<v Speaker 2>So I mean we are I am kind of bound

847
00:49:09.079 --> 00:49:09.400
<v Speaker 2>up in that.

848
00:49:09.480 --> 00:49:12.599
<v Speaker 1>But man, well listen, you're gonna find if you go

849
00:49:12.719 --> 00:49:17.480
<v Speaker 1>visit Orthodox Church and Orthodox Divine Liturgy, you're gonna find

850
00:49:18.119 --> 00:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a new family that will help replace what you feel

851
00:49:21.000 --> 00:49:24.400
<v Speaker 1>like might be missing family wise. I can guarantee you

852
00:49:24.480 --> 00:49:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that as long as you find a decent church, which

853
00:49:26.519 --> 00:49:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not too hard. But you know, when

854
00:49:31.320 --> 00:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I left Rome in two thousand and eight nine, somewhere

855
00:49:36.960 --> 00:49:41.039
<v Speaker 1>in there. You know, I had several Roman Catholic friends,

856
00:49:41.519 --> 00:49:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think I've maintained maybe one or two of those,

857
00:49:44.320 --> 00:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>but I've gotten much better friends. So you'll find better friends.

858
00:49:51.039 --> 00:49:54.519
<v Speaker 1>So just go check out the community icono what's up?

859
00:49:55.039 --> 00:49:57.079
<v Speaker 1>And then I'll go to the Protestant person here, mister

860
00:49:57.440 --> 00:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>s or whatever. Hey man.

861
00:50:00.039 --> 00:50:03.119
<v Speaker 12>And I was just wondering if the cult meeting got

862
00:50:03.719 --> 00:50:04.719
<v Speaker 12>postponed for tonight?

863
00:50:05.480 --> 00:50:08.960
<v Speaker 1>The cult meeting? It did? Did you you? If you

864
00:50:09.000 --> 00:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't wear your Hawaiian shirt vestiments, you're not allowed to

865
00:50:14.760 --> 00:50:18.119
<v Speaker 1>come back to the cult anymore, because, as Rouselan says, right,

866
00:50:18.360 --> 00:50:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Miamivice is cult aesthetics.

867
00:50:21.280 --> 00:50:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I got you and one more thing.

868
00:50:23.239 --> 00:50:25.199
<v Speaker 14>Someone told me that in order to get a debate

869
00:50:25.239 --> 00:50:28.000
<v Speaker 14>with Ruslan, first, you've got a bot five.

870
00:50:27.880 --> 00:50:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Of his prayer journals.

871
00:50:29.480 --> 00:50:32.000
<v Speaker 16>Apparently there's just thousands of them sitting in a storage

872
00:50:32.000 --> 00:50:32.960
<v Speaker 16>of being in California.

873
00:50:33.079 --> 00:50:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot and a bunch of Blessed God

874
00:50:36.840 --> 00:50:38.599
<v Speaker 1>T shirts too. So if you don't get a T

875
00:50:38.719 --> 00:50:43.079
<v Speaker 1>shirt and a prayer journal, the T shirt you saw

876
00:50:43.119 --> 00:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>him preaching in, uh, he won't have anything to do

877
00:50:45.880 --> 00:50:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with you. So yeah, you got to get that merch

878
00:50:48.079 --> 00:50:53.519
<v Speaker 1>dog mister s or should I say missus?

879
00:50:54.280 --> 00:50:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Hell?

880
00:50:54.440 --> 00:50:57.920
<v Speaker 13>Well, m yeah, so do you have a valid argument

881
00:50:57.960 --> 00:50:59.440
<v Speaker 13>for pros as falls?

882
00:51:01.400 --> 00:51:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Sure? It's uh not taught in the New Testament or

883
00:51:05.440 --> 00:51:06.320
<v Speaker 1>by the Church fathers.

884
00:51:07.760 --> 00:51:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Wait, what do you think about it?

885
00:51:08.800 --> 00:51:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Argument has I guess I don't know. I don't I've

886
00:51:11.800 --> 00:51:14.599
<v Speaker 1>never had any logic class. I don't know anything about validity.

887
00:51:14.639 --> 00:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>You'll have to teach me.

888
00:51:15.719 --> 00:51:16.039
<v Speaker 2>You don't know.

889
00:51:19.360 --> 00:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't tell me if.

890
00:51:20.280 --> 00:51:22.719
<v Speaker 21>The premises necessarily and tell the conclusions that.

891
00:51:22.719 --> 00:51:23.079
<v Speaker 2>You have that.

892
00:51:24.119 --> 00:51:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Protestanism is false because it's not taught the

893
00:51:27.039 --> 00:51:28.960
<v Speaker 1>New Testament. It's not taught by the Church fathers. There

894
00:51:28.960 --> 00:51:33.639
<v Speaker 1>you go, Okay, what Sanfranchie, you tell me why Protestantism

895
00:51:33.719 --> 00:51:35.719
<v Speaker 1>is true.

896
00:51:36.280 --> 00:51:37.679
<v Speaker 2>These guys are plundering already.

897
00:51:38.639 --> 00:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's nothing. I don't have to put it.

898
00:51:41.360 --> 00:51:44.039
<v Speaker 13>If it's the case that it necessarily doesn't follow from

899
00:51:44.079 --> 00:51:44.960
<v Speaker 13>the premises.

900
00:51:45.320 --> 00:51:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Valid do you have an argument or you're just gonna

901
00:51:47.559 --> 00:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>talk bullshit? So you don't have an argument? Yeah, the

902
00:51:51.519 --> 00:51:54.119
<v Speaker 1>argument I don't have to put I don't have to

903
00:51:54.159 --> 00:51:56.679
<v Speaker 1>put it into I'm not putting it into a syllogism

904
00:51:56.719 --> 00:51:58.199
<v Speaker 1>because I don't want it. I don't have to for you.

905
00:51:58.320 --> 00:52:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So Protestantism is protestant is, Protestantism is not taught in

906
00:52:02.320 --> 00:52:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the Yeah, Protestantism is not. Protestantism is not taught in

907
00:52:06.920 --> 00:52:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the New Testament. Protestantism is not taught in the New Testament.

908
00:52:09.800 --> 00:52:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Therefore it's false. Wow, that's the argument.

909
00:52:14.519 --> 00:52:15.639
<v Speaker 2>That's a claim.

910
00:52:16.800 --> 00:52:20.599
<v Speaker 1>No, it's an argument. You can dispute it now, that

911
00:52:20.639 --> 00:52:21.639
<v Speaker 1>actually is an argument.

912
00:52:23.840 --> 00:52:24.000
<v Speaker 18>No.

913
00:52:24.000 --> 00:52:27.639
<v Speaker 1>No, we all agree that we have to we have

914
00:52:27.719 --> 00:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to stop interrupting me. Stop interrupting me. We all agree,

915
00:52:31.920 --> 00:52:34.599
<v Speaker 1>we all we all agree that we have to follow

916
00:52:34.599 --> 00:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the New Testament. The New Testament does not teach Protestanism. Therefore,

917
00:52:38.719 --> 00:52:42.599
<v Speaker 1>protestist is false. There's your there's your syllogism. No, that's

918
00:52:42.599 --> 00:52:47.119
<v Speaker 1>a syllogism. The Protestant is the New Testament is true.

919
00:52:47.440 --> 00:52:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's here. Here is the syllogism. Protestantism is true. Excuse mean,

920
00:52:53.880 --> 00:52:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the New Testament is true. Protestanism is not taught in

921
00:52:56.159 --> 00:53:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the New Testament, therefore it's false. Okay, what's the I

922
00:53:01.159 --> 00:53:03.000
<v Speaker 1>don't All I have to do is give you a syllogism.

923
00:53:03.400 --> 00:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Understandogisms need like infant is the syllogism invalid? Is the

924
00:53:09.960 --> 00:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>syllogism invalid? Yeah, how is it invalid? How is it invalid?

925
00:53:15.880 --> 00:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Given that it doesn't have what? How is this? That

926
00:53:18.920 --> 00:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't tell me that it's invalid? No, it doesn't. It's

927
00:53:22.920 --> 00:53:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a it's a valid syllogism. You don't agree, so you're

928
00:53:27.440 --> 00:53:29.440
<v Speaker 1>just trolling. You don't even have an argument. You don't

929
00:53:29.480 --> 00:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>have an argument. I gave you a syllogism. I gave

930
00:53:32.000 --> 00:53:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you the very thing you asked for. How is it

931
00:53:34.920 --> 00:53:37.320
<v Speaker 1>not valid? What is it violate? What does it value?

932
00:53:37.800 --> 00:53:41.079
<v Speaker 1>What does it violate? What does it violate?

933
00:53:41.760 --> 00:53:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Good?

934
00:53:41.960 --> 00:53:42.079
<v Speaker 11>Good?

935
00:53:42.119 --> 00:53:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Good? What law does it violate?

936
00:53:45.360 --> 00:53:45.880
<v Speaker 4>What law?

937
00:53:46.119 --> 00:53:48.480
<v Speaker 21>He can't about.

938
00:53:48.800 --> 00:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>The syllogism is valid. You wanted a syllogistic form of it,

939
00:53:53.400 --> 00:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so that was nothing. The New Testament is true. Protestantism

940
00:53:59.079 --> 00:54:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is not taught in the New Testament. Therefore Protestants is false.

941
00:54:02.760 --> 00:54:05.760
<v Speaker 1>That's the argument. Now you can disagree with it. That's

942
00:54:05.800 --> 00:54:08.400
<v Speaker 1>not invalid. What's up, man?

943
00:54:12.559 --> 00:54:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Hello?

944
00:54:14.199 --> 00:54:14.679
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

945
00:54:16.199 --> 00:54:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

946
00:54:16.440 --> 00:54:16.679
<v Speaker 22>Jay?

947
00:54:17.559 --> 00:54:19.519
<v Speaker 23>I just wanted to say I appreciate what you do

948
00:54:19.639 --> 00:54:20.119
<v Speaker 23>so much.

949
00:54:21.639 --> 00:54:23.280
<v Speaker 1>My brother is super chatted earlier.

950
00:54:23.320 --> 00:54:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm a CD of human in the Orthodox Church.

951
00:54:25.480 --> 00:54:29.679
<v Speaker 23>And Cliff Connectel is coming to my school tomorrow.

952
00:54:29.960 --> 00:54:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I answered that super chat earlier today.

953
00:54:32.719 --> 00:54:35.639
<v Speaker 23>Yeah, I just wanted to follow up on like specific

954
00:54:35.719 --> 00:54:38.440
<v Speaker 23>question and if there's anything you would add and how

955
00:54:38.519 --> 00:54:42.960
<v Speaker 23>you think you'd respond if solo scripture is true, how

956
00:54:42.960 --> 00:54:45.679
<v Speaker 23>do you know which books are scripture without appealing to

957
00:54:45.800 --> 00:54:48.360
<v Speaker 23>the authority of the early Church that you don't accept

958
00:54:48.400 --> 00:54:48.960
<v Speaker 23>as binding.

959
00:54:51.440 --> 00:54:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Sure, I mean there's a lot of different ways you

960
00:54:53.199 --> 00:54:55.039
<v Speaker 1>could go about that line of argument. That would be fine.

961
00:54:56.079 --> 00:54:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, sweet, let's go.

962
00:54:58.679 --> 00:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks j Yeah, by the way, I don't even think

963
00:55:00.960 --> 00:55:03.159
<v Speaker 1>that guy. I think that that sounds like an atheist.

964
00:55:03.199 --> 00:55:06.239
<v Speaker 1>That's an atheist trying to pretend that he is a Protestant,

965
00:55:06.360 --> 00:55:09.039
<v Speaker 1>because no Protestant would argue some stupid line of argument

966
00:55:09.079 --> 00:55:14.559
<v Speaker 1>like that key tone.

967
00:55:18.280 --> 00:55:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Hello, what's up? Hey?

968
00:55:21.840 --> 00:55:22.360
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

969
00:55:22.480 --> 00:55:22.679
<v Speaker 4>Jay?

970
00:55:23.360 --> 00:55:27.239
<v Speaker 24>So you know, some of my friends came up to

971
00:55:27.280 --> 00:55:30.239
<v Speaker 24>speak to Malert and they were like pressing him, and

972
00:55:30.320 --> 00:55:32.960
<v Speaker 24>this guy Mallard just wants to keep saying you blocked him,

973
00:55:33.440 --> 00:55:33.800
<v Speaker 24>and you.

974
00:55:33.840 --> 00:55:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Know that, Yeah, he's unblocked right now, so he can

975
00:55:37.000 --> 00:55:40.800
<v Speaker 1>come in here. He's running right, He is unblocked, so

976
00:55:40.880 --> 00:55:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that he could come if he wants to. But I

977
00:55:42.320 --> 00:55:43.679
<v Speaker 1>knew he's not gonna come.

978
00:55:44.519 --> 00:55:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, because pretty much.

979
00:55:46.440 --> 00:55:48.280
<v Speaker 24>I went on as like you know Panel of twice

980
00:55:48.440 --> 00:55:53.079
<v Speaker 24>and you know he just won't come up. Is it unbelievable?

981
00:55:53.079 --> 00:55:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Wait? What won't come up? What do you mean it's panel?

982
00:55:55.679 --> 00:55:55.960
<v Speaker 15>Uh?

983
00:55:56.199 --> 00:55:57.719
<v Speaker 24>He keeps saying, like you know, it's like you know

984
00:55:57.840 --> 00:56:01.039
<v Speaker 24>him is a roving guy in Christian King JP, and

985
00:56:01.079 --> 00:56:03.320
<v Speaker 24>they're just like talking about like, oh they're help me, Jada,

986
00:56:03.360 --> 00:56:05.679
<v Speaker 24>I won't come way here, like and then talking about

987
00:56:05.679 --> 00:56:07.119
<v Speaker 24>you're just scared of them, like J.

988
00:56:08.719 --> 00:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I already debated their idiot, their idiot, but buddy JP uncut,

989
00:56:13.320 --> 00:56:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Why would I be scared of them if I already

990
00:56:15.280 --> 00:56:17.199
<v Speaker 1>debated the dude? They did the exact same thing a

991
00:56:17.280 --> 00:56:20.079
<v Speaker 1>year ago. They're just doing this to get attention, and

992
00:56:20.159 --> 00:56:22.079
<v Speaker 1>they there's no reason why they can't call in right

993
00:56:22.119 --> 00:56:25.599
<v Speaker 1>here and continue streaming and clip farm whatever they want.

994
00:56:25.920 --> 00:56:27.599
<v Speaker 24>No, I agree, you destroy them, but like why is

995
00:56:27.679 --> 00:56:28.880
<v Speaker 24>calling like on your phone or something?

996
00:56:28.960 --> 00:56:30.639
<v Speaker 2>Just make them look embarrassing.

997
00:56:30.199 --> 00:56:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm on my phone right here with you. What

998
00:56:31.840 --> 00:56:32.559
<v Speaker 1>are you talking about?

999
00:56:33.199 --> 00:56:34.800
<v Speaker 24>No, but you can just like switch over and destroy

1000
00:56:34.840 --> 00:56:35.440
<v Speaker 24>and we'll quick right.

1001
00:56:36.840 --> 00:56:39.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to. They can call in here. I've

1002
00:56:39.239 --> 00:56:41.440
<v Speaker 1>already given them a platform.

1003
00:56:42.159 --> 00:56:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Just keep asking them all right, see jack.

1004
00:56:47.840 --> 00:56:53.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh not going on their stream for one, I'm not

1005
00:56:53.320 --> 00:56:56.800
<v Speaker 1>giving them what they want. I don't bow to them.

1006
00:56:56.840 --> 00:56:59.360
<v Speaker 1>They don't. It's like Rouselan say, you don't summon me,

1007
00:56:59.800 --> 00:57:07.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't summon me. Listen. I don't go on all

1008
00:57:08.000 --> 00:57:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the other streams. I do an open callin stream where

1009
00:57:11.119 --> 00:57:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you can call into me for people who have no following.

1010
00:57:13.960 --> 00:57:17.760
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of low tier need god level goobers. I

1011
00:57:17.800 --> 00:57:19.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have to go, and I'm not giving you a

1012
00:57:19.400 --> 00:57:21.480
<v Speaker 1>formal debate. You can call in here.

1013
00:57:23.280 --> 00:57:25.119
<v Speaker 25>Ye uh huh.

1014
00:57:25.519 --> 00:57:27.519
<v Speaker 21>You know I have a question about I know you're

1015
00:57:27.559 --> 00:57:28.760
<v Speaker 21>keep eating questions.

1016
00:57:28.440 --> 00:57:31.239
<v Speaker 1>But why why are you always sound like you're about

1017
00:57:31.239 --> 00:57:34.159
<v Speaker 1>to laugh? Why why are you acting like you? Why

1018
00:57:34.159 --> 00:57:39.000
<v Speaker 1>are you always about to laugh? Questions you? Okay, why

1019
00:57:39.039 --> 00:57:40.920
<v Speaker 1>are you about to laugh? What's funny that you were

1020
00:57:40.920 --> 00:57:41.679
<v Speaker 1>getting blocked?

1021
00:57:41.760 --> 00:57:44.639
<v Speaker 21>But can you can you keep singer and boss telling.

1022
00:57:44.800 --> 00:57:49.280
<v Speaker 1>You he's unblocked to come here, That's what I'm saying.

1023
00:57:49.559 --> 00:57:51.679
<v Speaker 2>So I'm asking why does he keep the building? When

1024
00:57:51.719 --> 00:57:52.280
<v Speaker 2>did that happen?

1025
00:57:53.079 --> 00:57:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I always blocked these gobers, and then I unblocked them

1026
00:57:55.239 --> 00:57:56.719
<v Speaker 1>if I want them to come to debate, which I

1027
00:57:56.719 --> 00:57:58.360
<v Speaker 1>know they're not going to do, but I unblock them

1028
00:57:58.360 --> 00:58:00.199
<v Speaker 1>so that they can come to Bate. I block all

1029
00:58:00.199 --> 00:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the people that won't come to Bate. That's always been

1030
00:58:02.599 --> 00:58:05.000
<v Speaker 1>that's always been my mode of operation, and I'm gonna

1031
00:58:05.039 --> 00:58:06.639
<v Speaker 1>keep doing it and I don't care whether you'll like

1032
00:58:06.639 --> 00:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it or not. All right, smart uh huhm hm ek,

1033
00:58:12.519 --> 00:58:16.239
<v Speaker 1>what's up? These call her as? This is all his

1034
00:58:16.360 --> 00:58:19.679
<v Speaker 1>dumb audience. And you see the level of his audience.

1035
00:58:19.760 --> 00:58:22.199
<v Speaker 1>This is what you get in these people's audience. This

1036
00:58:22.320 --> 00:58:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is the this is the orbiters of Ruslan. Okay, they're

1037
00:58:25.360 --> 00:58:28.559
<v Speaker 1>even lower tier than Ruslan, which is hard to imagine,

1038
00:58:29.000 --> 00:58:31.719
<v Speaker 1>but that's who these people are. They're trying to get

1039
00:58:31.719 --> 00:58:33.239
<v Speaker 1>me to go. I'm not going on there, so you're

1040
00:58:33.239 --> 00:58:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just wasting your time.

1041
00:58:34.000 --> 00:58:34.159
<v Speaker 4>E K.

1042
00:58:34.320 --> 00:58:36.599
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Hey, man?

1043
00:58:37.280 --> 00:58:38.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you saw it.

1044
00:58:38.199 --> 00:58:42.159
<v Speaker 26>Yesterday, Rachel Wilson posted on x it's like compilation of Ruslan,

1045
00:58:42.440 --> 00:58:45.280
<v Speaker 26>basically like saying he's it was like early on in

1046
00:58:45.360 --> 00:58:49.000
<v Speaker 26>his career, and he's like, I'm trying to monetize my audience, man,

1047
00:58:49.119 --> 00:58:50.639
<v Speaker 26>trying to make like seven figures.

1048
00:58:50.679 --> 00:58:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I should I played it yesterday. Yeah we should

1049
00:58:56.039 --> 00:59:00.840
<v Speaker 1>go back to that. Let's see, and everybody's like, no,

1050
00:59:01.000 --> 00:59:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that ain't fair to him?

1051
00:59:02.039 --> 00:59:02.199
<v Speaker 14>Do that?

1052
00:59:02.239 --> 00:59:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Ain't fear to him? Why is it not fair to him?

1053
00:59:04.360 --> 00:59:08.199
<v Speaker 1>If he's still doing what he said he was gonna

1054
00:59:08.199 --> 00:59:13.440
<v Speaker 1>do it, no fear of him. Y'all just dumb and

1055
00:59:13.480 --> 00:59:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you fell for a grifter and you don't want to

1056
00:59:16.360 --> 00:59:21.199
<v Speaker 1>admit it. Sunken calls fallacy. I know I shared that.

1057
00:59:21.280 --> 00:59:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Where's it at? Oh?

1058
00:59:27.360 --> 00:59:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Here here?

1059
00:59:27.960 --> 00:59:32.639
<v Speaker 1>I think uh Alex Soren shared it too. Let's see.

1060
00:59:32.639 --> 00:59:41.239
<v Speaker 1>This is it who believes is dumb wigger grifter? Right here?

1061
00:59:41.239 --> 00:59:43.599
<v Speaker 1>This is so stupid O way, I've never seen this

1062
00:59:43.639 --> 00:59:44.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff until recently.

1063
00:59:45.320 --> 00:59:46.239
<v Speaker 22>I got the following.

1064
00:59:46.320 --> 00:59:49.159
<v Speaker 15>I got twenty eight two hundred thousand on TikTok two.

1065
00:59:50.320 --> 00:59:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Listen to this, bro, I got that following, dog, I

1066
00:59:53.119 --> 00:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>got twenty eight k, Bro, I.

1067
00:59:55.840 --> 00:59:57.920
<v Speaker 15>Got the following, I got twenty eight thousand. I got

1068
00:59:57.960 --> 01:00:01.280
<v Speaker 15>two hundred thousand on TikTok that five hundred thousand. How

1069
01:00:01.280 --> 01:00:02.760
<v Speaker 15>do I monetize these people?

1070
01:00:02.880 --> 01:00:05.360
<v Speaker 22>You know what I mean? How do I monetize these people?

1071
01:00:05.920 --> 01:00:10.559
<v Speaker 27>And through covetousness, shall they with feigned words make merchandise

1072
01:00:10.639 --> 01:00:11.519
<v Speaker 27>of money?

1073
01:00:12.559 --> 01:00:16.480
<v Speaker 4>I like shoes and I like money.

1074
01:00:16.719 --> 01:00:19.360
<v Speaker 15>And you got to figure out what what is your

1075
01:00:19.360 --> 01:00:21.400
<v Speaker 15>product going to be what can you sell people?

1076
01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:24.239
<v Speaker 4>That's the actual question, right.

1077
01:00:24.280 --> 01:00:26.119
<v Speaker 15>So we can puts the foot around and we can say, oh,

1078
01:00:26.280 --> 01:00:28.119
<v Speaker 15>like I want to have a ministry and I want

1079
01:00:28.119 --> 01:00:29.480
<v Speaker 15>to do this and I want to do that, right,

1080
01:00:29.559 --> 01:00:32.880
<v Speaker 15>But what we're really asking is like, how do I

1081
01:00:32.920 --> 01:00:34.880
<v Speaker 15>build a business?

1082
01:00:35.039 --> 01:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care, damn Son, this is so amazing.

1083
01:00:40.800 --> 01:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought it.

1084
01:00:41.599 --> 01:00:45.400
<v Speaker 15>AI care about how many followers I have. I need

1085
01:00:45.440 --> 01:00:48.199
<v Speaker 15>those metrics to an extent for the for the credibility

1086
01:00:48.280 --> 01:00:50.760
<v Speaker 15>of them. But I'm more thinking, what is my bank

1087
01:00:50.800 --> 01:00:52.199
<v Speaker 15>account going to look like in the next two to

1088
01:00:52.239 --> 01:00:52.679
<v Speaker 15>three years.

1089
01:00:52.719 --> 01:00:54.400
<v Speaker 22>I need I need seven figures. I need I need,

1090
01:00:54.440 --> 01:00:55.119
<v Speaker 22>I need seven figures.

1091
01:00:55.440 --> 01:00:57.760
<v Speaker 5>I would love to be in a position someday where

1092
01:00:58.199 --> 01:00:59.719
<v Speaker 5>I just have fu money.

1093
01:01:00.159 --> 01:01:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Bro.

1094
01:01:00.440 --> 01:01:02.519
<v Speaker 15>I got the following, I got twenty eight thousand. I

1095
01:01:02.519 --> 01:01:04.039
<v Speaker 15>got two hundred thousand on TikTok.

1096
01:01:05.360 --> 01:01:09.079
<v Speaker 1>It's with Griff Maxon over here. And it's amazing because

1097
01:01:09.519 --> 01:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>he ain't even shy about it. He just opened lots

1098
01:01:11.760 --> 01:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of Back in the day, you know, TV preachers will

1099
01:01:14.880 --> 01:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be a little more covert about it, you know what

1100
01:01:17.360 --> 01:01:19.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. They was now It's just like no, I

1101
01:01:19.639 --> 01:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>just I'm straight up. Just here, get that get paid doll,

1102
01:01:22.800 --> 01:01:28.079
<v Speaker 1>the stack stacks doll. Yes, this is real. I mean

1103
01:01:28.159 --> 01:01:30.519
<v Speaker 1>unless somebody made an AI short, this is real.

1104
01:01:31.760 --> 01:01:34.039
<v Speaker 22>How do I monetize these people? You know what I mean?

1105
01:01:34.199 --> 01:01:36.000
<v Speaker 22>How do I monetize these people?

1106
01:01:36.559 --> 01:01:41.239
<v Speaker 27>And through covetousness, shall they, with feigned words make meschandise

1107
01:01:41.320 --> 01:01:44.360
<v Speaker 27>of you whose judgment now have a long time linger

1108
01:01:44.320 --> 01:01:44.639
<v Speaker 27>with not.

1109
01:01:45.400 --> 01:01:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I like shoes.

1110
01:01:48.519 --> 01:01:55.519
<v Speaker 1>I like shoes, freaking gay as hell, dude shoes. The

1111
01:01:55.679 --> 01:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>women like shoes. That's a feminine thing, Toby, what's up

1112
01:02:04.039 --> 01:02:08.119
<v Speaker 1>those that I like shoes? I like heels, I like

1113
01:02:08.239 --> 01:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>my slip on Jordan's what.

1114
01:02:14.360 --> 01:02:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

1115
01:02:18.400 --> 01:02:21.639
<v Speaker 21>Just before I ask my question asman, thank you because

1116
01:02:22.039 --> 01:02:25.639
<v Speaker 21>similar to the guy a couple of guys before, I

1117
01:02:25.719 --> 01:02:28.480
<v Speaker 21>used to be a heavy atheist, like an anti theist,

1118
01:02:28.559 --> 01:02:31.239
<v Speaker 21>and then I started watching your stuff and you've helped me. Uh,

1119
01:02:31.719 --> 01:02:33.519
<v Speaker 21>definitely convert to Christianity.

1120
01:02:34.559 --> 01:02:34.800
<v Speaker 27>Cool.

1121
01:02:35.559 --> 01:02:38.239
<v Speaker 2>My question was on the on tag? Could I run

1122
01:02:38.280 --> 01:02:38.599
<v Speaker 2>it byke?

1123
01:02:40.440 --> 01:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're not really doing tag tonight. I mean,

1124
01:02:42.440 --> 01:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>can you just come that back next time with that

1125
01:02:44.400 --> 01:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>tonight's topics or Catholicism and Protestantism. So I'm not trying

1126
01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:50.599
<v Speaker 1>to be a douchebag. It's just I want to sit

1127
01:02:50.679 --> 01:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>here for twenty minutes explaining philosophical stuff. I'm not being rude,

1128
01:02:54.639 --> 01:02:59.039
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's Protestant, Catholic, Mormon stuff tonight. I'm just

1129
01:02:59.159 --> 01:03:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the energy for tag tonight, Stallion. What's up?

1130
01:03:04.880 --> 01:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>As soon as I start explaining a bunch of philosophical stuff,

1131
01:03:07.480 --> 01:03:10.559
<v Speaker 1>it's going to go from seventeen hundred to eight hundred?

1132
01:03:11.519 --> 01:03:12.599
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Man? And you?

1133
01:03:13.719 --> 01:03:16.719
<v Speaker 2>That was good.

1134
01:03:17.000 --> 01:03:20.159
<v Speaker 13>I was just appear to ask when looking at Eastern Catholics,

1135
01:03:21.360 --> 01:03:23.239
<v Speaker 13>and by the way, I'm like, I'm with you. I'm

1136
01:03:23.320 --> 01:03:29.079
<v Speaker 13>round and more Certism, you know, I'm more Orthodox sympathetic,

1137
01:03:29.599 --> 01:03:32.000
<v Speaker 13>you know, so when looking at us, I live in

1138
01:03:32.119 --> 01:03:34.599
<v Speaker 13>an area with a lot of Eastern Catholics, and so

1139
01:03:34.679 --> 01:03:37.840
<v Speaker 13>they try to pos it like, you know that they

1140
01:03:37.880 --> 01:03:40.519
<v Speaker 13>are I mean they, I mean they are essentially Eastern

1141
01:03:40.639 --> 01:03:42.079
<v Speaker 13>Orthodox by communion with Rome.

1142
01:03:42.119 --> 01:03:44.280
<v Speaker 2>But isn't that just the catchlin two? Like, is isn't

1143
01:03:44.280 --> 01:03:45.519
<v Speaker 2>that just the double amy on them? You know?

1144
01:03:46.039 --> 01:03:50.559
<v Speaker 1>It is? It's an even worse uh position to be in.

1145
01:03:50.639 --> 01:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's also an obvious refutation of the Roman Catholic system,

1146
01:03:54.400 --> 01:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>because how can you have competing theologies and confessions of

1147
01:03:57.960 --> 01:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>faith when everybody admits that the church has one confession

1148
01:04:01.760 --> 01:04:04.199
<v Speaker 1>of faith, so how can there be too? How can

1149
01:04:04.239 --> 01:04:06.639
<v Speaker 1>you be in a church that believes in the phillyoquay

1150
01:04:06.639 --> 01:04:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and also rejects it.

1151
01:04:08.400 --> 01:04:11.639
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, and I just want to confirm if I'm to

1152
01:04:11.719 --> 01:04:17.079
<v Speaker 13>be baptized Orthodox, what's the stance on marrying an Unorthodox,

1153
01:04:17.199 --> 01:04:20.280
<v Speaker 13>marrying a Catholic or marrying and you know, what is

1154
01:04:20.320 --> 01:04:20.920
<v Speaker 13>the stance on that?

1155
01:04:20.960 --> 01:04:23.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's a decision that you will suss out

1156
01:04:23.719 --> 01:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>with your spiritual father, that will be decided canonically. That's

1157
01:04:28.159 --> 01:04:30.199
<v Speaker 1>not something I can really tell you. I mean, there

1158
01:04:30.280 --> 01:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>is there are allowances through economia for marriage to people

1159
01:04:35.039 --> 01:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>who are not well Orthodox, but it's not wise, it's

1160
01:04:37.880 --> 01:04:40.679
<v Speaker 1>not recommended. But that's something that you know, you'd have

1161
01:04:40.719 --> 01:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>to take that up with them, with the people that

1162
01:04:43.079 --> 01:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>will bring you in. Drake, what's up? Yeah, I'm trying

1163
01:04:47.360 --> 01:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to monetize them. People don't following.

1164
01:04:49.360 --> 01:04:51.360
<v Speaker 15>I got twenty eight thousand, I got two hundred thousand

1165
01:04:51.480 --> 01:04:53.559
<v Speaker 15>on TikTok hundred thousand.

1166
01:04:53.760 --> 01:04:55.400
<v Speaker 22>How do I monetize these people?

1167
01:04:55.519 --> 01:04:56.039
<v Speaker 4>You know what I mean?

1168
01:04:56.159 --> 01:04:58.000
<v Speaker 22>How do I monetize these people?

1169
01:04:58.519 --> 01:05:01.360
<v Speaker 27>And through covetousness, shall they with feigned?

1170
01:05:01.519 --> 01:05:01.559
<v Speaker 23>What?

1171
01:05:01.960 --> 01:05:04.639
<v Speaker 1>By the way, where are the Protestants calling out Ruslan

1172
01:05:04.880 --> 01:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for this stuff? And uh? People are saying in the chat,

1173
01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>which I still haven't gone and sussed this out, but

1174
01:05:13.280 --> 01:05:17.559
<v Speaker 1>they were saying that Rouslan was a leftist or leftist

1175
01:05:17.599 --> 01:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic for many years calling out people like Bryson Gray.

1176
01:05:24.639 --> 01:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So I imagine that. Imagine those two idiots in a

1177
01:05:27.480 --> 01:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>room together right calling out Bryson Gay. Uh, because Bryson

1178
01:05:33.480 --> 01:05:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Gay was too political. I mean, I'm not in a

1179
01:05:37.159 --> 01:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>maga cult either. I don't have a problem criticizing and

1180
01:05:39.880 --> 01:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>rejecting all kinds of things from Trump, which we've done

1181
01:05:42.519 --> 01:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>consistently for the whole time. But I mean, wasn't it

1182
01:05:47.079 --> 01:05:49.199
<v Speaker 1>funny in Rousselan's video He's like, I don't care about

1183
01:05:49.199 --> 01:05:51.039
<v Speaker 1>Epstein and what all he's up to. Well, you ought

1184
01:05:51.039 --> 01:05:52.559
<v Speaker 1>to care about Epstein because it has to do with

1185
01:05:53.159 --> 01:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the stranglehold that evangelical Zionism has on the entire country.

1186
01:05:58.519 --> 01:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't matter what's up man, Yo.

1187
01:06:01.760 --> 01:06:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Jay appreciate you.

1188
01:06:03.559 --> 01:06:06.960
<v Speaker 28>And I see alex Is in the voice chat debating,

1189
01:06:07.280 --> 01:06:10.559
<v Speaker 28>I think it's important. I'm a Baptist background acquiring the

1190
01:06:10.679 --> 01:06:14.880
<v Speaker 28>Orthodoxy through the arguments you presented and Alex had presented.

1191
01:06:15.079 --> 01:06:17.199
<v Speaker 2>I just want to call it real quick because I'm.

1192
01:06:17.039 --> 01:06:18.559
<v Speaker 28>Sure you have a video about it. But do you

1193
01:06:18.559 --> 01:06:22.800
<v Speaker 28>have any recommendations on books about worship, how the Early

1194
01:06:22.880 --> 01:06:26.760
<v Speaker 28>Church worship, how it's connected to Old Testament worship.

1195
01:06:27.119 --> 01:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a whole documentary that we made. It's called

1196
01:06:29.719 --> 01:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Christian Worship and the Old Testament at Orthodox Shahada channel.

1197
01:06:33.599 --> 01:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The documentary recommends several books like Williams and Anstall's book

1198
01:06:37.079 --> 01:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>on the Temple and the Synagogue Liturgy being the basis

1199
01:06:40.039 --> 01:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Orthodox Liturgy, and Hugh Weybrew's book Byzantine Liturgy.

1200
01:06:44.519 --> 01:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But thank you for the call, Austin. What's up? Austin?

1201
01:06:55.840 --> 01:06:58.639
<v Speaker 1>What's up you over there? R? And B Church? He

1202
01:06:58.719 --> 01:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>dropped off Taylor, child of the Most High. Whenever I

1203
01:07:03.920 --> 01:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>see that, I know I'm in trouble. I'm a child

1204
01:07:06.880 --> 01:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Most High. What's up?

1205
01:07:08.840 --> 01:07:09.000
<v Speaker 11>Man?

1206
01:07:09.880 --> 01:07:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Are you a woman?

1207
01:07:11.679 --> 01:07:11.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah?

1208
01:07:11.920 --> 01:07:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm a woman.

1209
01:07:13.400 --> 01:07:15.960
<v Speaker 29>I was wondering when you think about women in apologetics

1210
01:07:16.880 --> 01:07:20.320
<v Speaker 29>because the multiple women like Phoebe in the propheta Sannah

1211
01:07:20.559 --> 01:07:22.559
<v Speaker 29>who I share the Gospel in the Bible.

1212
01:07:22.880 --> 01:07:23.559
<v Speaker 2>What do you think.

1213
01:07:23.400 --> 01:07:25.719
<v Speaker 1>About that, Well, that was during a time when there

1214
01:07:25.800 --> 01:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>was ongoing divine revelation. So if the Holy Spirit shows

1215
01:07:28.920 --> 01:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to speak through a woman or a prophet to us,

1216
01:07:31.440 --> 01:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he can do that. But that doesn't mean that women

1217
01:07:34.519 --> 01:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>are called to that in the history of the church,

1218
01:07:36.360 --> 01:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's why women are typically not in that role.

1219
01:07:40.679 --> 01:07:42.199
<v Speaker 29>But they share the good news with Paul.

1220
01:07:43.800 --> 01:07:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Did you not hear what I said? I mean, you

1221
01:07:47.119 --> 01:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>can share the Gospel and you can convert people. That

1222
01:07:49.320 --> 01:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you're called to be an apologist.

1223
01:07:52.679 --> 01:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

1224
01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:55.559
<v Speaker 29>And when you issue with Bryson, why'd you call him gay?

1225
01:07:56.920 --> 01:08:00.239
<v Speaker 1>He's an anti trinitarian, insane, heretic. What are you talking about?

1226
01:08:00.280 --> 01:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>You don't think that trinity is a fundamental deed of

1227
01:08:02.880 --> 01:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Christ or fundamental doctions of Christianity.

1228
01:08:06.280 --> 01:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I do, But I.

1229
01:08:06.840 --> 01:08:09.480
<v Speaker 29>Think that's like, you know, going beyond what's written and

1230
01:08:09.519 --> 01:08:10.400
<v Speaker 29>causes division.

1231
01:08:10.480 --> 01:08:12.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, how could it be?

1232
01:08:13.679 --> 01:08:16.079
<v Speaker 29>He says, do not feel beyond what's written and divide?

1233
01:08:16.119 --> 01:08:20.520
<v Speaker 29>You know, basically have divisions, So.

1234
01:08:20.760 --> 01:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>How can I doesn't John saying one, John two that

1235
01:08:23.760 --> 01:08:28.079
<v Speaker 1>if you deny Christ, you're anti Christ. Absolutely, So it's

1236
01:08:28.119 --> 01:08:30.479
<v Speaker 1>not going beyond what's written to say that denying the

1237
01:08:30.520 --> 01:08:32.199
<v Speaker 1>deity of Christ makes your Antichrist.

1238
01:08:34.479 --> 01:08:38.600
<v Speaker 29>But you cannot deny deity without accepting trinity because one thing, like,

1239
01:08:38.680 --> 01:08:41.079
<v Speaker 29>for example, to say Christ is eternal.

1240
01:08:41.319 --> 01:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>With the Father, you can, yes, it is. What are

1241
01:08:45.079 --> 01:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? So you're not a child? You're not

1242
01:08:48.039 --> 01:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>even that does? How does that mean? He's not divine?

1243
01:08:52.399 --> 01:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean does my does? Are you a polytheist? How

1244
01:08:56.680 --> 01:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>many divinities you worship?

1245
01:08:59.119 --> 01:08:59.239
<v Speaker 2>No?

1246
01:08:59.359 --> 01:09:02.119
<v Speaker 29>But he said, like, why is it even a father

1247
01:09:02.159 --> 01:09:03.840
<v Speaker 29>and a son? If the father didn't create the son?

1248
01:09:03.880 --> 01:09:05.199
<v Speaker 29>He said, I proceeded from the Father.

1249
01:09:05.600 --> 01:09:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's it, said, I came from That's eternal generation.

1250
01:09:09.560 --> 01:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not a where do you get creation? It says

1251
01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>probably fifty times a New Testament. The son is not

1252
01:09:14.239 --> 01:09:18.119
<v Speaker 1>a creature. Where do you get that? He's a creature?

1253
01:09:20.760 --> 01:09:24.399
<v Speaker 29>It talks about in Psalms two seven, like I will proclaim.

1254
01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:25.680
<v Speaker 2>The words decree on.

1255
01:09:25.560 --> 01:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>This day I have forgotten the Yeah, that's any that's

1256
01:09:28.439 --> 01:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>an eternal begotten. That's an eternal begetting. Because John one

1257
01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>says he's the only begotten God monoganies theos but begotten

1258
01:09:38.840 --> 01:09:43.119
<v Speaker 1>at what point eternally begotten? Do you think that if

1259
01:09:43.119 --> 01:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I had a son? Would he said, have the same

1260
01:09:45.720 --> 01:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>nature as me. Yeah, okay, okay. Is God uncreated the Father?

1261
01:09:53.760 --> 01:09:54.000
<v Speaker 30>Yes?

1262
01:09:54.119 --> 01:09:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay. So if he, if he has a son, wouldn't

1263
01:09:56.399 --> 01:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the son have the same nature? Yes, But but he's yes,

1264
01:10:01.039 --> 01:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>but he's what.

1265
01:10:03.319 --> 01:10:04.359
<v Speaker 2>But he's not the prime mover.

1266
01:10:04.399 --> 01:10:06.560
<v Speaker 29>A logic would say, there must be a prime mover.

1267
01:10:06.520 --> 01:10:07.319
<v Speaker 2>And I'll be the father.

1268
01:10:07.399 --> 01:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, What does that have to do with eternal generation?

1269
01:10:10.960 --> 01:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>He could be the prime mover and eternally prime move

1270
01:10:13.399 --> 01:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a son as his offspring.

1271
01:10:16.439 --> 01:10:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Is there multiple prime movers?

1272
01:10:19.159 --> 01:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>The father is in this argument the prime mover. The

1273
01:10:22.039 --> 01:10:24.479
<v Speaker 1>son is what's moved. But it's an eternal moving.

1274
01:10:26.239 --> 01:10:28.520
<v Speaker 29>But it says in this day, on this day, I

1275
01:10:28.520 --> 01:10:29.079
<v Speaker 29>have begotten.

1276
01:10:29.600 --> 01:10:32.239
<v Speaker 1>That means eternal generation. And the way that we know

1277
01:10:32.319 --> 01:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that is John One where he says in the beginning

1278
01:10:34.800 --> 01:10:36.159
<v Speaker 1>was the word the word was good with God, the

1279
01:10:36.159 --> 01:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>word was God.

1280
01:10:39.680 --> 01:10:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1281
01:10:39.840 --> 01:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean you already admitted this when you said that

1282
01:10:41.600 --> 01:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the father's nature is uncreated and the son has the

1283
01:10:43.880 --> 01:10:46.399
<v Speaker 1>same nature. So there you go. You you yourself said it.

1284
01:10:47.920 --> 01:10:50.760
<v Speaker 29>Okay, I just think the words device of like transarianism.

1285
01:10:50.760 --> 01:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's well, who even put the Bible together? So

1286
01:10:53.840 --> 01:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>what do you what do you you don't. I don't

1287
01:10:55.079 --> 01:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>even grant that you.

1288
01:10:55.600 --> 01:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Have the.

1289
01:10:57.279 --> 01:10:59.399
<v Speaker 1>We don't necessarily we don't know who put the Bible together.

1290
01:11:00.479 --> 01:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't know who put the Bible together.

1291
01:11:03.199 --> 01:11:04.880
<v Speaker 29>Yeah, who put the Code Exeneticus together?

1292
01:11:04.920 --> 01:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's not the Bible. That's one textual tradition.

1293
01:11:07.840 --> 01:11:09.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not the Bible. Who put the New Testament together

1294
01:11:10.239 --> 01:11:12.319
<v Speaker 1>with the Old Testament in the first thousand years of

1295
01:11:12.319 --> 01:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the church. You don't know who created the Why are

1296
01:11:15.640 --> 01:11:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you asking me a different question? How does that ask?

1297
01:11:18.239 --> 01:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not an answer. That's a textual tradition. You don't

1298
01:11:20.520 --> 01:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>know the difference beween a textual tradition.

1299
01:11:21.840 --> 01:11:25.680
<v Speaker 29>They can in a scripture, but the Code Exeneticus has

1300
01:11:25.720 --> 01:11:26.680
<v Speaker 29>all the books.

1301
01:11:27.279 --> 01:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>That is a textual tradition. It's not a canon.

1302
01:11:33.119 --> 01:11:34.800
<v Speaker 29>Well then, I mean, what if you don't subscribe to

1303
01:11:34.840 --> 01:11:37.000
<v Speaker 29>a canon, you subscribe to the textual tradition.

1304
01:11:40.039 --> 01:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you know that's the right textual tradition?

1305
01:11:44.359 --> 01:11:47.880
<v Speaker 29>The same reason that the squirrels preserve the Old Testament.

1306
01:11:49.319 --> 01:11:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Totally irrelevant, nothing to do, irrelevant. Okay, you don't even

1307
01:11:53.239 --> 01:11:56.039
<v Speaker 1>understand this isn't irrelevant. It doesn't even relate to what

1308
01:11:56.079 --> 01:11:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. How do you know what the books

1309
01:11:58.279 --> 01:12:02.079
<v Speaker 1>are in the Bible is appealing to the dec He's

1310
01:12:02.079 --> 01:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>WROA has nothing to do with that, Austin, what's up?

1311
01:12:08.119 --> 01:12:11.239
<v Speaker 1>That's why women shouldn't be in an apologetics? You, you, yourself,

1312
01:12:11.279 --> 01:12:14.399
<v Speaker 1>are the argument for why women can't do apologetics. You're

1313
01:12:14.399 --> 01:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>not made for that. What's up? Conn, I've what's up?

1314
01:12:21.039 --> 01:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>This other guy can't get in here? Hello?

1315
01:12:26.039 --> 01:12:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Can you hear me? M hm?

1316
01:12:28.640 --> 01:12:32.720
<v Speaker 16>So I was a Catholic seminarian for two years and

1317
01:12:33.439 --> 01:12:37.000
<v Speaker 16>one of my Greek Orthodox friends brought up Luminingen Tim's

1318
01:12:37.039 --> 01:12:41.159
<v Speaker 16>sixteen to me, and as a Catholic in good faith,

1319
01:12:42.319 --> 01:12:44.560
<v Speaker 16>I'm willing to admit I can't argue it and say

1320
01:12:44.560 --> 01:12:46.800
<v Speaker 16>that Muslims and Catholics worship the same God.

1321
01:12:47.279 --> 01:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Good, So you have some discernment. So yeah, So.

1322
01:12:51.880 --> 01:12:55.159
<v Speaker 16>I've asked various priests and other theologians that I know,

1323
01:12:56.079 --> 01:12:58.479
<v Speaker 16>and the main arguments I hear are like it's like

1324
01:12:58.560 --> 01:13:02.920
<v Speaker 16>these cope arguments, like I'm usually told Christians, Jews, and

1325
01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:04.479
<v Speaker 16>Muslims all worship the same God.

1326
01:13:04.880 --> 01:13:07.479
<v Speaker 2>You know that's not true, or I'll hear.

1327
01:13:07.479 --> 01:13:10.640
<v Speaker 16>It doesn't matter what the church father said here in

1328
01:13:10.800 --> 01:13:14.119
<v Speaker 16>this portion, because it was a different time period, and

1329
01:13:14.159 --> 01:13:17.840
<v Speaker 16>it's like, that's not true. So I'm writing a letter

1330
01:13:17.880 --> 01:13:21.079
<v Speaker 16>to a Catholic theologian and apologist that I personally know.

1331
01:13:21.399 --> 01:13:25.279
<v Speaker 16>He's like, he's actually gonna know about it. So I'm

1332
01:13:25.319 --> 01:13:28.119
<v Speaker 16>just curious if there's any resources that you would recommend.

1333
01:13:28.920 --> 01:13:29.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1334
01:13:29.159 --> 01:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's called First John okay and chapter yeah, chapter two,

1335
01:13:35.039 --> 01:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>which says that if you deny the Son, you're Antichrist.

1336
01:13:38.359 --> 01:13:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Now again, remember in the watch the debate that we

1337
01:13:41.399 --> 01:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>did with Trent Doherty h and whatever that other guber's

1338
01:13:47.920 --> 01:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>name is. And you'll notice in that debate, I asked

1339
01:13:50.560 --> 01:13:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Trent Doherty, I say, so, you're telling me that Jake

1340
01:13:52.520 --> 01:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Muslim metaphysician who has explicitly rejected the Trinity,

1341
01:13:56.359 --> 01:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>that he still worships the same God even though Muslim

1342
01:14:00.319 --> 01:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>explicitly say Allah is not a father. That right there

1343
01:14:05.039 --> 01:14:07.399
<v Speaker 1>will show you. And I think that shows everybody how

1344
01:14:07.399 --> 01:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>absurd the line of argumentation is for these guys, because

1345
01:14:09.760 --> 01:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>they will actually still stress, no, he still worships the

1346
01:14:12.920 --> 01:14:16.479
<v Speaker 1>same God. Keep in mind, too, there's ambiguity about the

1347
01:14:16.560 --> 01:14:20.279
<v Speaker 1>term worship and if Atican two had restricted their language

1348
01:14:20.319 --> 01:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to saying something like Muslims Christians and Jews all perhaps

1349
01:14:24.159 --> 01:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>reference or intend to reference the same entity or object

1350
01:14:27.960 --> 01:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that could be one thing, but they mistakenly use or

1351
01:14:30.960 --> 01:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>perhaps not mistakenly use the word worship. Worship is not

1352
01:14:34.680 --> 01:14:38.359
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as mental, notional recognition, or reference. Worship

1353
01:14:38.399 --> 01:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>has to do with what God lays down to what

1354
01:14:40.640 --> 01:14:44.279
<v Speaker 1>he accepts. God does not accept Muslim and Jewish worship.

1355
01:14:44.319 --> 01:14:47.039
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that we're told multiple times in New

1356
01:14:47.079 --> 01:14:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Testament when Paul writes the Book of Hebrews and says

1357
01:14:49.199 --> 01:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's a dead religion, and Judaism is not going

1358
01:14:51.560 --> 01:14:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to commend you to God through dead rituals and things

1359
01:14:54.439 --> 01:14:56.279
<v Speaker 1>that are fulfilled in the Church and in Christ. So

1360
01:14:57.880 --> 01:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Rabbinic judaism is not the worship of the One True God.

1361
01:15:02.800 --> 01:15:04.399
<v Speaker 1>And you can read the Gospel of John two, of

1362
01:15:04.479 --> 01:15:07.279
<v Speaker 1>John five through nine where Jesus argues with the Pharisees

1363
01:15:07.319 --> 01:15:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that he is the I Am of Exodus and that

1364
01:15:10.520 --> 01:15:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the only that no one comes to the Father but

1365
01:15:12.439 --> 01:15:15.239
<v Speaker 1>through him, and you do not have the Father because

1366
01:15:15.439 --> 01:15:19.439
<v Speaker 1>they do not have him. So Jesus himself repeats the

1367
01:15:19.479 --> 01:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>same message of first John two. Yeah, that's what I

1368
01:15:24.880 --> 01:15:27.119
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was writing about. So I mean I

1369
01:15:27.199 --> 01:15:31.479
<v Speaker 1>found some things from Chrysostom. Yeah, Chrystm says Muslim.

1370
01:15:32.039 --> 01:15:36.920
<v Speaker 16>I don't want to make a context error by in

1371
01:15:37.039 --> 01:15:39.920
<v Speaker 16>putting Muslims where Jews are, but I feel like it

1372
01:15:40.039 --> 01:15:40.760
<v Speaker 16>kind of makes sense.

1373
01:15:42.039 --> 01:15:44.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the same line of argumentation. I mean, in fact,

1374
01:15:44.399 --> 01:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it's even worse for the Muslim argument because Muslims explicitly

1375
01:15:47.840 --> 01:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>reject that God is a father. Yeah, and Jews at

1376
01:15:51.039 --> 01:15:53.319
<v Speaker 1>least admit God as a father. So, and I'm not

1377
01:15:53.359 --> 01:15:55.159
<v Speaker 1>saying that that makes it the same reference. I'm just

1378
01:15:55.159 --> 01:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>saying it's even more removed from the Jewish position because

1379
01:15:57.880 --> 01:16:01.239
<v Speaker 1>of an explicit rejection of father and son in Islam.

1380
01:16:01.239 --> 01:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's just preposterous to still say, oh, but it's

1381
01:16:03.920 --> 01:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>still the same Why, well, it's the same word again.

1382
01:16:07.039 --> 01:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>It's all just terrible arguments. Zaiah, what's up? You crowed

1383
01:16:13.720 --> 01:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a move? Mary on Friday? You marry what's up? I'm

1384
01:16:29.920 --> 01:16:45.399
<v Speaker 1>mute three? What's up? Three clocks? I mute three clocks?

1385
01:16:48.239 --> 01:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Jay, thanks for taking the question.

1386
01:16:52.439 --> 01:16:56.880
<v Speaker 14>I was curious if you could provide what you think

1387
01:16:57.000 --> 01:16:58.840
<v Speaker 14>the best steel man.

1388
01:16:58.680 --> 01:17:03.479
<v Speaker 2>For the papacy is and how you would refute it.

1389
01:17:14.319 --> 01:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't maybe supposedly the papacy would give

1390
01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you decisions on disputed matters. Maybe that's the strongest argument

1391
01:17:25.880 --> 01:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that they have, and the reputation would be that that

1392
01:17:29.159 --> 01:17:32.319
<v Speaker 1>doesn't actually seem to be the case. I mean, we

1393
01:17:32.399 --> 01:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>have massive lack of clarity for the last seventy years

1394
01:17:35.560 --> 01:17:39.039
<v Speaker 1>in the Roman Catholic world on theology and morals. So

1395
01:17:39.359 --> 01:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the supposed you know, sales pitch that the papacy will

1396
01:17:42.840 --> 01:17:47.039
<v Speaker 1>give us unity, certitude, clarity, and preservation of the faith

1397
01:17:47.439 --> 01:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>falls apart in the last seventy years. So Zio, what's up?

1398
01:17:58.159 --> 01:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>What's us?

1399
01:18:00.279 --> 01:18:00.479
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

1400
01:18:00.760 --> 01:18:01.680
<v Speaker 25>Thanks for taking a question.

1401
01:18:01.760 --> 01:18:05.439
<v Speaker 17>I had a few questions. You know, I've been watching

1402
01:18:05.439 --> 01:18:08.600
<v Speaker 17>you debate for a while. I haven't really seen you

1403
01:18:08.720 --> 01:18:12.039
<v Speaker 17>lose a theological debate. Really haven't seen you lose a

1404
01:18:12.039 --> 01:18:12.680
<v Speaker 17>debate at all.

1405
01:18:14.279 --> 01:18:15.159
<v Speaker 2>I am an Eastern.

1406
01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:17.960
<v Speaker 21>Orthodoge Christian, and I mean I just had like a

1407
01:18:17.960 --> 01:18:18.520
<v Speaker 21>few questions.

1408
01:18:18.520 --> 01:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>One of them is personal.

1409
01:18:20.359 --> 01:18:22.239
<v Speaker 17>I don't know if you're cool with answer and answering that.

1410
01:18:22.840 --> 01:18:25.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't care, okay, And I have.

1411
01:18:25.920 --> 01:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Also had a theological question.

1412
01:18:29.359 --> 01:18:31.640
<v Speaker 17>Do you think that saying the N word is holy

1413
01:18:31.960 --> 01:18:33.279
<v Speaker 17>and rooted in good faith?

1414
01:18:33.760 --> 01:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell me why? They tell me why? The

1415
01:18:35.600 --> 01:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>N word is a bad word. Well for me, now

1416
01:18:41.760 --> 01:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>why is it bad? Now for you? I don't ask you.

1417
01:18:43.560 --> 01:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>For you, why is it bad? What are the bad words?

1418
01:18:45.840 --> 01:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And how do we know what they are?

1419
01:18:47.800 --> 01:18:48.000
<v Speaker 15>Well?

1420
01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it can be.

1421
01:18:50.680 --> 01:18:53.039
<v Speaker 17>Like I guess, it can be kind of defined as

1422
01:18:53.079 --> 01:18:56.680
<v Speaker 17>an idol or careless way of speaking.

1423
01:18:57.800 --> 01:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So all idol speech includes what every joke is also

1424
01:19:03.960 --> 01:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>part of that? No, definitely not. Well why would a

1425
01:19:07.520 --> 01:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>joke not be part of idle speech?

1426
01:19:10.680 --> 01:19:12.840
<v Speaker 17>Because I think that a joke is coming from a

1427
01:19:12.840 --> 01:19:14.119
<v Speaker 17>different place in heart.

1428
01:19:15.319 --> 01:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>So now it's motives that didn't that determine it? Well,

1429
01:19:19.920 --> 01:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but you said that you said the in word. Now

1430
01:19:21.640 --> 01:19:23.279
<v Speaker 1>you said the in word itself was bad.

1431
01:19:23.880 --> 01:19:26.359
<v Speaker 17>My marguement would be that it's not building you up

1432
01:19:26.520 --> 01:19:30.680
<v Speaker 17>in your spirit, coming from the Eastern Orthodox perspective.

1433
01:19:31.560 --> 01:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>So and my question again is exact same question, because

1434
01:19:35.800 --> 01:19:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you moved the goalpost to say that it's the word itself,

1435
01:19:39.399 --> 01:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the in word, because you said, well, it's idle speech. Well,

1436
01:19:42.640 --> 01:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>jokes are idle speech And you're like, no, it has

1437
01:19:44.880 --> 01:19:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to do with the motives. Well, how do you know

1438
01:19:46.279 --> 01:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the motives? So which one you're you keep shifting as

1439
01:19:48.640 --> 01:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to what makes it bad by the way. You don't

1440
01:19:51.680 --> 01:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you understand like twenty different black people gave me inward passes.

1441
01:19:54.800 --> 01:19:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's cool, that's cool.

1442
01:19:57.079 --> 01:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>How is it?

1443
01:19:57.520 --> 01:19:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Well? So?

1444
01:19:57.800 --> 01:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>How so? How am I bad? If it's cool?

1445
01:19:59.399 --> 01:20:01.399
<v Speaker 2>Now, it's cool, it's cool.

1446
01:20:01.680 --> 01:20:04.079
<v Speaker 17>I was really just asking you, what like if you

1447
01:20:04.199 --> 01:20:07.680
<v Speaker 17>think that saying the N word is holy and rooted

1448
01:20:07.720 --> 01:20:08.359
<v Speaker 17>in good faith?

1449
01:20:08.399 --> 01:20:11.319
<v Speaker 1>That was my original. Okay, sure, I just wanted to

1450
01:20:11.319 --> 01:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>get your goodbye. Yeah, you go point out and show

1451
01:20:14.600 --> 01:20:17.239
<v Speaker 1>how holy you are. Everybody else somewhere else, Mendoza, what's up?

1452
01:20:19.319 --> 01:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Go ask h Brosi why he gave me so many

1453
01:20:21.880 --> 01:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>inward passes? What's up? Man? Mendoza?

1454
01:20:25.880 --> 01:20:26.199
<v Speaker 11>A J.

1455
01:20:26.439 --> 01:20:30.279
<v Speaker 30>Doyer, this is Ruth Blawn's bar bro I mean hair

1456
01:20:30.399 --> 01:20:32.359
<v Speaker 30>dresser and all the broccoli cook king.

1457
01:20:32.600 --> 01:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, y'o yo, you got a little bit of cheese

1458
01:20:34.760 --> 01:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to add to that broccoli.

1459
01:20:36.840 --> 01:20:38.520
<v Speaker 10>My brother Paum was on a shadow.

1460
01:20:38.520 --> 01:20:39.039
<v Speaker 14>What's you want?

1461
01:20:39.119 --> 01:20:39.239
<v Speaker 31>Bro?

1462
01:20:39.960 --> 01:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I just we know Rouselan is all about that cheddar.

1463
01:20:44.680 --> 01:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>That's that money, dog, that's that money, bro J Doyer?

1464
01:20:47.760 --> 01:20:51.800
<v Speaker 20>Can you put it to a syllogistic Sylogilly with the

1465
01:20:52.439 --> 01:20:55.520
<v Speaker 20>why Protestantism and Ruthlan and faking.

1466
01:20:55.279 --> 01:21:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Great I can't, bro, I guess I gotta retuire. Yeah,

1467
01:21:04.520 --> 01:21:09.039
<v Speaker 1>what can you explain how using the in word is holy?

1468
01:21:11.520 --> 01:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm not holy.

1469
01:21:12.800 --> 01:21:15.319
<v Speaker 25>So there we go, exposed.

1470
01:21:15.439 --> 01:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Dude, nobody cares about this shit anymore. People don't care

1471
01:21:17.720 --> 01:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>about the four letter words and grandstanding and pearl clutching

1472
01:21:21.479 --> 01:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>about all of that. That's just so gay, dude, and

1473
01:21:24.039 --> 01:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't care anymore. I don't care at a certain point, man,

1474
01:21:27.920 --> 01:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>after years and people just attack you NonStop over everything.

1475
01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:35.279
<v Speaker 1>And I said, again, this is the same stuff. Remember

1476
01:21:35.319 --> 01:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>when Sam Shamoun and his buck buddy William Albrick tried

1477
01:21:40.560 --> 01:21:44.039
<v Speaker 1>to get me because somebody went in his chat calling

1478
01:21:44.119 --> 01:21:47.319
<v Speaker 1>scam Shamou a sand inward and they tried to say

1479
01:21:47.359 --> 01:21:50.319
<v Speaker 1>it was me, which is probably them a bunch of snakes,

1480
01:21:50.880 --> 01:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>just some random ass dude in Streamyard, like I'm on

1481
01:21:53.560 --> 01:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>stream Yard while I'm on my live stream and I'm

1482
01:21:55.720 --> 01:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in I mean, it's just retarded, like I'm not ever

1483
01:21:57.640 --> 01:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>going on their streams. And meanwhile, then then scam Shamou,

1484
01:22:03.079 --> 01:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>now he doesn't have a problem saying all these words, right,

1485
01:22:05.880 --> 01:22:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, imagine Sam Shamun trying to call people out

1486
01:22:09.359 --> 01:22:15.199
<v Speaker 1>for words that's crazy. I'm the emperor of Xantheum. I

1487
01:22:15.279 --> 01:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>have at least twenty four inward passes, which I use

1488
01:22:19.239 --> 01:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is very selectively in choice situations. And I don't care

1489
01:22:25.760 --> 01:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>whether you're like or not. I don't care what you think.

1490
01:22:27.239 --> 01:22:31.239
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Man? Listen? The only way to do media,

1491
01:22:31.560 --> 01:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>The only way to handle this stuff is to not care.

1492
01:22:34.239 --> 01:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>You have to not care. You can't hand look at

1493
01:22:37.439 --> 01:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you do freak out, You have a

1494
01:22:40.239 --> 01:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>meltdown like Rusline. What's up, man, Hey, Jake and Hearn.

1495
01:22:47.159 --> 01:22:51.399
<v Speaker 32>I listened to your debate a long time ago, but

1496
01:22:51.439 --> 01:22:54.880
<v Speaker 32>I listened to it recently again yesterday with erky.

1497
01:22:54.640 --> 01:22:56.439
<v Speaker 25>Bar that you had uh huh.

1498
01:22:56.479 --> 01:22:59.199
<v Speaker 32>And one of the points that you had to keeat

1499
01:22:59.199 --> 01:23:01.279
<v Speaker 32>over and over again because he didn't understand it was

1500
01:23:01.920 --> 01:23:05.159
<v Speaker 32>your rejection of classical foundationalism and how he kept on

1501
01:23:05.239 --> 01:23:09.079
<v Speaker 32>asking you what does he have to point towards in

1502
01:23:09.199 --> 01:23:12.479
<v Speaker 32>history in order to prove like people infallibility or people

1503
01:23:12.600 --> 01:23:18.359
<v Speaker 32>jurisdiction and stuff like that. I guess, how are we

1504
01:23:18.399 --> 01:23:20.239
<v Speaker 32>supposed to look at history? And how do we use

1505
01:23:20.279 --> 01:23:25.319
<v Speaker 32>that coherence type of argmentation to look at historical data?

1506
01:23:27.119 --> 01:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>That well, the main point The main point of that

1507
01:23:28.920 --> 01:23:32.279
<v Speaker 1>response was, you know, Eric's whole approach was, let me

1508
01:23:32.359 --> 01:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>stack up all of these supposed evidences for a strong

1509
01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>papal perspective, and then isn't it likely that this would

1510
01:23:40.039 --> 01:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>tip over into Vatican one? And I said, I don't

1511
01:23:42.560 --> 01:23:46.239
<v Speaker 1>even grant that, because at a systemic level, if there's

1512
01:23:46.279 --> 01:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>one dogmatic contradiction that disproves the whole system. So it's

1513
01:23:49.520 --> 01:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just an easier, quicker way to go about the apologetics

1514
01:23:52.880 --> 01:23:56.279
<v Speaker 1>because the old way apologetics was done back when, you know,

1515
01:23:56.319 --> 01:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it was like the last decade or so of Roman

1516
01:23:58.840 --> 01:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Catholics versus protest It was always this quote mind war

1517
01:24:02.920 --> 01:24:05.239
<v Speaker 1>back and forth of well, here's all my quotes that

1518
01:24:05.239 --> 01:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the church fathers don't think that it's Peter and Matthew sixteen,

1519
01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>and here's this over here, the exegesis of this passage.

1520
01:24:12.239 --> 01:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>And it was just endless throwing quotes back and forth,

1521
01:24:16.399 --> 01:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>which never gets you anywhere. So how about a quicker way.

1522
01:24:19.840 --> 01:24:22.199
<v Speaker 1>Just like if we're debating an atheist, I'm gonna tear

1523
01:24:22.279 --> 01:24:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the whole foundation out from under them by going after

1524
01:24:24.520 --> 01:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the presubpositions and assumptions. I do the same thing with

1525
01:24:27.560 --> 01:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the Roman Catholic. If there's one dogmatic contradiction, the entire

1526
01:24:30.720 --> 01:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>system fails, and they never understand this because they don't

1527
01:24:34.039 --> 01:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think systemically. Then once they get it, it clicks. And ironically,

1528
01:24:38.520 --> 01:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in that very debate, I think I'm going for a memory,

1529
01:24:40.880 --> 01:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>but I think Abara said something like, if you could

1530
01:24:43.159 --> 01:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>show a dogmatic contradiction, I'd have to admit that is false. Well,

1531
01:24:47.920 --> 01:24:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm That's the whole point of why we're

1532
01:24:50.239 --> 01:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to argue. Look, because if you go that approach,

1533
01:24:54.479 --> 01:24:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it never goes anywhere. You're going to be throwing scholars

1534
01:24:57.359 --> 01:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. It's the same debate that's a stupid,

1535
01:24:59.840 --> 01:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a debate about who's got the right miracles. It's never

1536
01:25:02.840 --> 01:25:05.279
<v Speaker 1>going to prove anything. The Protestant's going to sit there

1537
01:25:05.319 --> 01:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>forever and not believe Fatima, and you're gonna sit there

1538
01:25:08.399 --> 01:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>forever trying to prove Fatima as a miracle, and it's

1539
01:25:10.640 --> 01:25:13.279
<v Speaker 1>not going to go anywhere. So what's really at root

1540
01:25:13.800 --> 01:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is our interpretive frameworks about how we understand the world,

1541
01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and thus miracles, for example, whether they're even possible is

1542
01:25:22.840 --> 01:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>determined by your presuppositions. So the whole debate is always

1543
01:25:25.840 --> 01:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>presuppositional unless you're specifically debating some topic that's more political

1544
01:25:31.880 --> 01:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>or you know, ethical, like is abortion wrong or something

1545
01:25:34.560 --> 01:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>like that, But even that's going to probably go back

1546
01:25:36.159 --> 01:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to presupposition. So because I was in the Roman Catholic

1547
01:25:39.960 --> 01:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>system for a long time and I lived it and

1548
01:25:41.880 --> 01:25:45.239
<v Speaker 1>I tried to argue for it, I understand how they think,

1549
01:25:45.319 --> 01:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and I've identified the specific mistake, which is foundationalism, and

1550
01:25:49.479 --> 01:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>they're always going to go back to that, whether it's

1551
01:25:51.439 --> 01:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Tomism or whether it's the way they approach apologetics and

1552
01:25:54.239 --> 01:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the papacy and stacking up all these evidences supposedly because

1553
01:25:58.399 --> 01:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they have a very naive approach. They have a pre

1554
01:26:00.720 --> 01:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>modern approach to metaphysics, and evidence is in brute facts. Well,

1555
01:26:04.720 --> 01:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>if there's not brew facts, then that whole thing fails.

1556
01:26:08.119 --> 01:26:11.319
<v Speaker 1>And you'll notice they actually already kind of believe that.

1557
01:26:11.680 --> 01:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to their debates with Protestants about the

1558
01:26:14.399 --> 01:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>persepecuted scripture, they'll all argue that scripture actually isn't perspicuous.

1559
01:26:18.760 --> 01:26:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Scripture actually has to be interpreted, and sometimes it's very complex,

1560
01:26:22.119 --> 01:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult and requires systemic level thinking. Oh okay, well,

1561
01:26:26.439 --> 01:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>then guess what the rest of other things are that way.

1562
01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the worldview is that way. Metaphysics is

1563
01:26:32.720 --> 01:26:37.319
<v Speaker 1>that way, history is that way. There aren't brute facts

1564
01:26:37.359 --> 01:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in history that we just all will, I guess we

1565
01:26:38.800 --> 01:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all agree that. You know, Council of Constructinople three said this.

1566
01:26:43.439 --> 01:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Now everybody's debating the Council of concept a Noble three

1567
01:26:45.840 --> 01:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and what it means. There's gigantic decades long, perhaps centuries long.

1568
01:26:50.920 --> 01:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Who's that, Martin Jugi. Martin Jugi spent years arguing that

1569
01:26:54.720 --> 01:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Constantinople three teaches tomism. It's a prototomistic interpretation of Jesus

1570
01:26:59.640 --> 01:27:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to deny the energies. So again, at every angle, what's

1571
01:27:05.680 --> 01:27:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the root assumption here? Route factuality, evidentialism, and foundationalism. So

1572
01:27:14.680 --> 01:27:17.279
<v Speaker 1>if I undercut all of that, and that was part

1573
01:27:17.319 --> 01:27:19.039
<v Speaker 1>of what the whole Trent Hornaby was about when I

1574
01:27:19.119 --> 01:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>debated him on natural theology, I'm like, this whole system

1575
01:27:21.920 --> 01:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>is built on a very naive you know, ancient medieval

1576
01:27:25.920 --> 01:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>perspective on metaphysics and laws of logic is just givens.

1577
01:27:29.960 --> 01:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>But we live in a modern world that doesn't grant

1578
01:27:32.399 --> 01:27:35.279
<v Speaker 1>that anymore. So I'm just going to say to Ericabar

1579
01:27:35.399 --> 01:27:39.079
<v Speaker 1>or anybody else, like, why should I build up a

1580
01:27:39.119 --> 01:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand stacks of evidences? Look at his whole papacy book.

1581
01:27:42.760 --> 01:27:45.319
<v Speaker 1>It's like five hundred boring ass pages trying to build

1582
01:27:45.399 --> 01:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>up a bunch of evidences when all I need is

1583
01:27:49.039 --> 01:27:52.319
<v Speaker 1>one contradiction in dogma and the whole system is false.

1584
01:27:53.840 --> 01:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they understand systemic thinking, which is ironic

1585
01:27:57.199 --> 01:28:01.039
<v Speaker 1>because they believe in systems like the Tomistics system. But

1586
01:28:01.119 --> 01:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the Tomistic system is essentially a foundationalist system. It's built

1587
01:28:04.920 --> 01:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>on natural theology and a form of foundationalism, and you know,

1588
01:28:07.600 --> 01:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Aristilian just sort of givens Well, people don't believe that anymore.

1589
01:28:11.680 --> 01:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>The whole world has moved on past that, So you're

1590
01:28:13.800 --> 01:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna need an apologetic that answers the modern world. You

1591
01:28:16.760 --> 01:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>can't just reassert Tomism as if it's a given. I mean,

1592
01:28:20.479 --> 01:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it's this is like, duh, dude, Christ Seeker, what's up? Man?

1593
01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm you hey?

1594
01:28:33.760 --> 01:28:34.319
<v Speaker 2>Can you hear me?

1595
01:28:36.680 --> 01:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey?

1596
01:28:37.600 --> 01:28:40.640
<v Speaker 33>Why is Protestantism false in your opinion?

1597
01:28:42.279 --> 01:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'll say what I said to the guy a

1598
01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:47.399
<v Speaker 1>minutor ago. Protestantism is not taught in the New Testament,

1599
01:28:47.439 --> 01:28:49.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's not taught by the people who put the

1600
01:28:49.119 --> 01:28:53.039
<v Speaker 1>New Testament together. Therefore, it's false.

1601
01:28:55.199 --> 01:29:03.039
<v Speaker 33>Did Apostolic succession cease great schism or did that continue

1602
01:29:03.079 --> 01:29:03.680
<v Speaker 33>in the.

1603
01:29:03.520 --> 01:29:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Roman Catholic Church?

1604
01:29:05.880 --> 01:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, as an Orthodox person, no, we don't believe it

1605
01:29:07.920 --> 01:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>continued in the Roman Catholic Church. They schismed.

1606
01:29:12.039 --> 01:29:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Oh really, I didn't know that. Huh.

1607
01:29:18.279 --> 01:29:23.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean Apostolic succession presupposes the Apostolic Faith. Rome departed

1608
01:29:23.319 --> 01:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on multiple counts from the Apostolic Faith, and the Orthodox

1609
01:29:26.760 --> 01:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Church believes that it has Apisolic succession and not Rome.

1610
01:29:33.239 --> 01:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Any heresy or schism makes you no longer a part

1611
01:29:35.680 --> 01:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of Apostolic succession. Doesn't matter how many hands you had

1612
01:29:38.880 --> 01:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>laid on you. It's not some mechanical thing like a

1613
01:29:42.079 --> 01:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort of ritual magic. If you lose the faith,

1614
01:29:44.840 --> 01:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>then you're not an Apostolic succeed succeed or I see.

1615
01:29:52.640 --> 01:29:59.199
<v Speaker 2>So what allows us to access God's energies?

1616
01:30:00.720 --> 01:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>God himself? God himself has condescended to be present and

1617
01:30:04.800 --> 01:30:07.439
<v Speaker 1>imminent in the world in various modes. Whether it's the

1618
01:30:07.439 --> 01:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>incarnation the second person that God had becoming a child,

1619
01:30:11.159 --> 01:30:16.079
<v Speaker 1>growing up defeating death, or whether it's the divine energies

1620
01:30:16.239 --> 01:30:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that are ever present throughout the world. Those are all

1621
01:30:19.439 --> 01:30:22.399
<v Speaker 1>condescensions of God to meet us. As Basil says in

1622
01:30:22.399 --> 01:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the letter two thirty four.

1623
01:30:24.960 --> 01:30:31.359
<v Speaker 33>Okay, you answered who, but like what gift does God?

1624
01:30:31.920 --> 01:30:32.039
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

1625
01:30:32.119 --> 01:30:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess you're asking grace? I guess is

1626
01:30:34.359 --> 01:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the answer to your question. Grace is the uncreated energies

1627
01:30:39.880 --> 01:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that we participate in.

1628
01:30:42.319 --> 01:30:45.119
<v Speaker 2>And what allows us tax has that grace.

1629
01:30:45.760 --> 01:30:48.079
<v Speaker 1>God allows us to I don't understand your question.

1630
01:30:49.760 --> 01:30:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Well with the whole like.

1631
01:30:51.600 --> 01:30:56.640
<v Speaker 33>Faith alone, doctrine and Protestantism, I'm seen it as the

1632
01:30:56.680 --> 01:31:00.640
<v Speaker 33>gift of faith is what allows us to add access

1633
01:31:00.800 --> 01:31:06.119
<v Speaker 33>God's grace, his uncreated love, glory, all of it.

1634
01:31:07.399 --> 01:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but Jesus says, this is the work of God

1635
01:31:09.920 --> 01:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that you believe on him whom he has sent. So

1636
01:31:11.720 --> 01:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>faith is a work too according to Jesus.

1637
01:31:17.359 --> 01:31:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Faith is a work by Jesus. Is that what Sheesus said, This.

1638
01:31:23.560 --> 01:31:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Is the work of God that you believe in Him

1639
01:31:26.600 --> 01:31:31.279
<v Speaker 1>whom he has sent. Thus faith is also a work

1640
01:31:31.520 --> 01:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>according to Jesus. Yeah, not of our own, well, not

1641
01:31:38.920 --> 01:31:41.479
<v Speaker 1>of your own in the sense of being only from you.

1642
01:31:41.560 --> 01:31:44.479
<v Speaker 1>But you do work with God at all points. Paul says,

1643
01:31:44.479 --> 01:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm a co worker with Christ. It is God's power

1644
01:31:47.039 --> 01:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>at work in me and through me. So that doesn't

1645
01:31:49.920 --> 01:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>mean that you lose your own will because God is

1646
01:31:51.920 --> 01:31:54.159
<v Speaker 1>at work in you. It's a both and it's ay synergy.

1647
01:31:55.840 --> 01:31:56.079
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1648
01:31:57.720 --> 01:32:03.000
<v Speaker 33>Do you think there's a harmonization between synergism and monogism?

1649
01:32:03.239 --> 01:32:13.159
<v Speaker 1>There? No monarchism is a monothelite heresy literally elaborate on that. Yeah.

1650
01:32:13.199 --> 01:32:17.039
<v Speaker 1>The fifth and sixth Ecumenical Councils ended up producing disputes

1651
01:32:17.079 --> 01:32:21.159
<v Speaker 1>with the Oriental Churches, which led to a debate about

1652
01:32:21.199 --> 01:32:24.439
<v Speaker 1>whether in Christ there's one energy that has to overcome

1653
01:32:24.479 --> 01:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and supplant or take over the human will and energy

1654
01:32:28.600 --> 01:32:31.119
<v Speaker 1>in Christ, or whether there's a synergy between the two

1655
01:32:31.159 --> 01:32:34.399
<v Speaker 1>wills at all times. And the Orthodox Church teaches, according

1656
01:32:34.399 --> 01:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>to the six Secumentical Council that in Christ there's a

1657
01:32:37.920 --> 01:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>perfect synergy between the natural will and energy in Christ's

1658
01:32:41.640 --> 01:32:44.239
<v Speaker 1>humanity and the natural will and energy in Christ's divinity.

1659
01:32:44.720 --> 01:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So that affects our view of anthropology and sateriology to

1660
01:32:48.800 --> 01:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>mean then that human beings at all points and times

1661
01:32:52.000 --> 01:32:55.159
<v Speaker 1>still have a natural human will and energy proper to

1662
01:32:55.279 --> 01:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>their nature. That at every point, whether it's beginning to

1663
01:32:58.760 --> 01:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>believe repenting the whole life of sanctification. All of those

1664
01:33:03.239 --> 01:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>phases include a human will and energy.

1665
01:33:08.279 --> 01:33:08.720
<v Speaker 27>Gotcha.

1666
01:33:09.359 --> 01:33:13.279
<v Speaker 33>But at the end of the day and humility it's

1667
01:33:13.319 --> 01:33:14.319
<v Speaker 33>all by God.

1668
01:33:14.800 --> 01:33:16.880
<v Speaker 2>That like monarchistic element.

1669
01:33:18.359 --> 01:33:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Where is where? Where is the monogism there?

1670
01:33:23.279 --> 01:33:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's all God at the end of the day.

1671
01:33:27.800 --> 01:33:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And humility.

1672
01:33:29.960 --> 01:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, you win. You're humble. Guapo? What's up? Gapo?

1673
01:33:44.800 --> 01:33:45.279
<v Speaker 1>What's up?

1674
01:33:46.600 --> 01:33:46.960
<v Speaker 15>What up?

1675
01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:47.640
<v Speaker 2>J How are you doing?

1676
01:33:49.439 --> 01:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You notice that guy as already asked, Oh, he must

1677
01:33:51.840 --> 01:33:54.239
<v Speaker 1>die or must be a fed because I don't concede

1678
01:33:54.279 --> 01:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>his moral high ground. It's about the black dude talking

1679
01:33:57.760 --> 01:33:59.079
<v Speaker 1>about the N word. What's up? Man?

1680
01:34:00.479 --> 01:34:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Can you hear me?

1681
01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:01.239
<v Speaker 15>Hello?

1682
01:34:01.720 --> 01:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

1683
01:34:02.920 --> 01:34:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all was I was.

1684
01:34:04.720 --> 01:34:07.479
<v Speaker 9>Inquired about worthotoxy for two years and I recently converted

1685
01:34:07.479 --> 01:34:11.359
<v Speaker 9>this Easter. I wanted to ask you, do you have

1686
01:34:11.399 --> 01:34:15.720
<v Speaker 9>any advice on helping parents convert? Because my mom is

1687
01:34:15.720 --> 01:34:18.359
<v Speaker 9>a non denominational and she really doesn't get the whole

1688
01:34:18.439 --> 01:34:20.680
<v Speaker 9>gist of Orthodoxy even if I were to explain it

1689
01:34:20.720 --> 01:34:20.960
<v Speaker 9>to her.

1690
01:34:22.439 --> 01:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I wouldn't try to debate and explain it

1691
01:34:24.880 --> 01:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to my parents. I would try to be a good

1692
01:34:26.600 --> 01:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>son and become a responsible adult, and that will be

1693
01:34:30.079 --> 01:34:33.199
<v Speaker 1>some of the best type of evidence and argumentation to

1694
01:34:33.359 --> 01:34:36.319
<v Speaker 1>help convince your mom. You're never going to convince your

1695
01:34:36.359 --> 01:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>your parents by debating them. Don't try it. It's a

1696
01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:41.159
<v Speaker 1>huge mistake I made in my twenties. Don't even waste

1697
01:34:41.159 --> 01:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>your time trying it. You're going to convert them through

1698
01:34:44.079 --> 01:34:48.199
<v Speaker 1>whether they're proud of you becoming immature adult electric? What's up?

1699
01:34:58.720 --> 01:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Have you forgiven on mobile electric?

1700
01:35:00.640 --> 01:35:06.039
<v Speaker 34>I'm you, Hey, Jay, it's an honor.

1701
01:35:06.159 --> 01:35:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Thanks a lot for having the MIC. I've seen your work.

1702
01:35:08.920 --> 01:35:11.640
<v Speaker 6>Super excited to talk to you. Thanks a lot for

1703
01:35:11.720 --> 01:35:18.359
<v Speaker 6>your time. I wanted to ask you a couple of questions.

1704
01:35:19.640 --> 01:35:23.640
<v Speaker 6>What would you advise for someone who has a belief

1705
01:35:23.680 --> 01:35:24.119
<v Speaker 6>in God?

1706
01:35:24.199 --> 01:35:26.359
<v Speaker 2>But how do you cross that bridge to face?

1707
01:35:27.239 --> 01:35:31.039
<v Speaker 6>And what do you think about death and dying and

1708
01:35:31.119 --> 01:35:33.359
<v Speaker 6>like what happens to you in the afterlife?

1709
01:35:37.119 --> 01:35:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I would say, go visit an Orthodox church and experience

1710
01:35:40.479 --> 01:35:44.720
<v Speaker 1>all of that in the first person. And I believe

1711
01:35:44.720 --> 01:35:49.039
<v Speaker 1>that when we die, we have a particular judgment and

1712
01:35:49.039 --> 01:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>then we have a return of the soul to God

1713
01:35:51.880 --> 01:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>sometimes called the toll houses, and we don't know the

1714
01:35:55.279 --> 01:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>specifics of all that. We may kind of be around

1715
01:36:00.479 --> 01:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the grave and so forth. His father sur from Rose

1716
01:36:04.800 --> 01:36:08.479
<v Speaker 1>says in his book Soul after Death, Life, the soul

1717
01:36:08.520 --> 01:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>after death, and then we return to God. So how

1718
01:36:13.920 --> 01:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that works out, we don't know the specifics. But and

1719
01:36:16.880 --> 01:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>then at the resurrection we are all rejoined to our

1720
01:36:19.960 --> 01:36:22.479
<v Speaker 1>bodies at the end of time, at the general resurrection

1721
01:36:22.960 --> 01:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for the Great White Throne judgment. So those are the

1722
01:36:25.680 --> 01:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and then we enter into the eternal resurrected new heavens

1723
01:36:29.960 --> 01:36:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and new Earth. Or we have rejected God and we

1724
01:36:34.520 --> 01:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>experience God as torment. Not that God torments people, but

1725
01:36:40.399 --> 01:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they God has experienced as torment. Ethan, what's up?

1726
01:36:52.079 --> 01:36:55.359
<v Speaker 2>What's that dogth?

1727
01:36:56.840 --> 01:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>You owe me a COUCHI suit Ethan? Hey, So I

1728
01:37:02.560 --> 01:37:04.479
<v Speaker 1>have an agnostic and.

1729
01:37:05.840 --> 01:37:11.439
<v Speaker 14>Eastern Orthodox inquiring background, and as fate happened, I also

1730
01:37:11.520 --> 01:37:16.920
<v Speaker 14>inquired at a foreign Baptist church recently made mistake because well,

1731
01:37:16.960 --> 01:37:18.159
<v Speaker 14>maybe not a mistake.

1732
01:37:17.840 --> 01:37:19.760
<v Speaker 2>But once I learned a little bit more.

1733
01:37:19.600 --> 01:37:23.239
<v Speaker 14>About the theology, I was horrified, frankly, and I think

1734
01:37:23.279 --> 01:37:26.159
<v Speaker 14>I've absorbed some of the assumptions of Eastern.

1735
01:37:26.119 --> 01:37:32.159
<v Speaker 30>Theology, which is why I reacted so negatively to reform theology.

1736
01:37:32.279 --> 01:37:35.159
<v Speaker 30>And I was wondering if you could kind of steal

1737
01:37:35.239 --> 01:37:40.239
<v Speaker 30>man A couple of positions and present how that could

1738
01:37:40.239 --> 01:37:44.279
<v Speaker 30>possibly gel with the Gospel and adjust.

1739
01:37:43.920 --> 01:37:48.760
<v Speaker 14>God, namely that God would only elect certain humans and

1740
01:37:49.079 --> 01:37:52.279
<v Speaker 14>not give us proper free will or give us a

1741
01:37:52.319 --> 01:37:55.800
<v Speaker 14>fake free will in which we can't actually choose him

1742
01:37:55.920 --> 01:38:01.439
<v Speaker 14>until He regenerates us through grace. I can't understand how

1743
01:38:02.159 --> 01:38:05.960
<v Speaker 14>these Calvinists can believe that a just God would create

1744
01:38:06.680 --> 01:38:10.399
<v Speaker 14>certain humans just to be condemned, which is the extension

1745
01:38:10.520 --> 01:38:11.159
<v Speaker 14>of that view.

1746
01:38:11.319 --> 01:38:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I can tell you how. It's called theological voluntarism,

1747
01:38:14.239 --> 01:38:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of the sort of attendant ideas to

1748
01:38:16.680 --> 01:38:20.159
<v Speaker 1>absolute divine simplicity. So when I was a Calvinist, the

1749
01:38:20.239 --> 01:38:23.119
<v Speaker 1>reason I thought this was because I just sort of

1750
01:38:23.159 --> 01:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>defaulted to thinking, well, God is the ultimate creator and

1751
01:38:27.359 --> 01:38:30.279
<v Speaker 1>sovereign being, and so that must mean then that he's

1752
01:38:30.359 --> 01:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>also the ultimate determiner of what is right and wrong. Right,

1753
01:38:34.960 --> 01:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>so that would mean that, well, if God did create

1754
01:38:37.720 --> 01:38:40.680
<v Speaker 1>somebody to damn them, you can't say God can't do that,

1755
01:38:40.720 --> 01:38:44.079
<v Speaker 1>because God can do anything that he wants. So because

1756
01:38:44.680 --> 01:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of a without knowing that, you know,

1757
01:38:46.880 --> 01:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>when I first became a Calvinist, I didn't know what

1758
01:38:48.399 --> 01:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>theological voluntarism was. I didn't realize that. Well, that's a

1759
01:38:52.520 --> 01:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>position that's kind of goes back to William of Auckham.

1760
01:38:54.640 --> 01:38:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Even though he wasn't a Calvinist, he had this voluntaristic

1761
01:38:57.119 --> 01:39:00.039
<v Speaker 1>position and Calvindary states it explicitly, which is that but

1762
01:39:00.479 --> 01:39:03.239
<v Speaker 1>God's will is his essence, and this God can will

1763
01:39:03.319 --> 01:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever he wants. And so there's not a nature that

1764
01:39:06.800 --> 01:39:11.239
<v Speaker 1>corresponds or of the good, or created natures that correspond

1765
01:39:11.319 --> 01:39:16.119
<v Speaker 1>to the divine nature. Right, So, because there's no created

1766
01:39:16.199 --> 01:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>natures that reflect the divine nature, God's nature thus has

1767
01:39:19.680 --> 01:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>no things or categories that restrict or bind it, and

1768
01:39:24.359 --> 01:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>so it has to be completely unbounded. The divine will

1769
01:39:26.960 --> 01:39:30.760
<v Speaker 1>has to be completely unbounded. And that was my presubposition

1770
01:39:30.880 --> 01:39:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about what divine sovereignty had to mean. So, because I

1771
01:39:34.760 --> 01:39:39.880
<v Speaker 1>had that perspective, that under was underlying my readings of

1772
01:39:39.920 --> 01:39:42.039
<v Speaker 1>all the texts. Right, so when I would read Ephesians

1773
01:39:42.079 --> 01:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one two, or when I would read Romans nine, or

1774
01:39:45.560 --> 01:39:48.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, various other passages to talk about divine sovereignty, like,

1775
01:39:48.119 --> 01:39:50.760
<v Speaker 1>my assumption is, oh, well, then that must mean that

1776
01:39:51.600 --> 01:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the elect are the fixed number of people

1777
01:39:54.319 --> 01:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that were chosen forth the foundational world because God's all knowing, right.

1778
01:39:58.199 --> 01:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But as you you learn more, and as you get

1779
01:40:00.920 --> 01:40:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a little more sophisticated, I think, with understanding philosophical distinctions

1780
01:40:05.399 --> 01:40:09.079
<v Speaker 1>that end up being pretty necessary for theology, you realize

1781
01:40:09.079 --> 01:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's some pretty big problems with theological voluntarism, and

1782
01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:15.079
<v Speaker 1>you realize, well, wait a minute, you know what I

1783
01:40:15.119 --> 01:40:18.399
<v Speaker 1>thought was a Reformation debate. They already had this debate

1784
01:40:18.399 --> 01:40:20.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle Ages, right, and this was the debate

1785
01:40:20.520 --> 01:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>over how many angels can dance on the head of

1786
01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a pen. That was a real theological debate because it

1787
01:40:27.640 --> 01:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>related to the question of which I think Aukham raised,

1788
01:40:30.560 --> 01:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>which was if God wanted to, could he immediately just

1789
01:40:33.800 --> 01:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>damn all the blessed that are in heaven? And if

1790
01:40:36.560 --> 01:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a theological voluntariers, you have to say, well, yeah,

1791
01:40:38.640 --> 01:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>because God's will is the ultimate determiner of good, and

1792
01:40:42.680 --> 01:40:45.119
<v Speaker 1>so God willed too he could actually change what the

1793
01:40:45.159 --> 01:40:48.039
<v Speaker 1>good is. Right, you can begin to see how well

1794
01:40:48.079 --> 01:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>actually this is moving more than more in the direction

1795
01:40:50.199 --> 01:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of like Islam. And then again you get more sophisticated,

1796
01:40:54.720 --> 01:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you learn more, you realize, oh, wait a minute, why

1797
01:40:57.560 --> 01:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>does sovereignty have to mean a absolute divine simplicity level

1798
01:41:02.560 --> 01:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>position that equates the divine will to the divine essence,

1799
01:41:05.680 --> 01:41:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and thus the divine will becomes an essential determining cause. So,

1800
01:41:11.479 --> 01:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, it didn't occur to me that God could

1801
01:41:14.560 --> 01:41:22.159
<v Speaker 1>create a world where there are multiple secondary causes, right,

1802
01:41:23.399 --> 01:41:25.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you think I think about Islam, Islam has

1803
01:41:25.720 --> 01:41:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the exact same position with what's called occasionalism. And if

1804
01:41:29.279 --> 01:41:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you're a Calvinist and you're looking into why Calvinism is wrong,

1805
01:41:34.439 --> 01:41:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend, at least if you want to approach

1806
01:41:37.119 --> 01:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>from a philosophical perspective. Our good buddy Lewis over at

1807
01:41:40.800 --> 01:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox Shahada made a very overlooked video that really flew

1808
01:41:45.760 --> 01:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>under the radar. It was a very I think it's

1809
01:41:49.279 --> 01:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because it was so kind of metaphysically oriented that most

1810
01:41:52.640 --> 01:41:59.359
<v Speaker 1>people kind of found it difficult. But I think if

1811
01:41:59.359 --> 01:42:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you have a little bit of philosophical knowledge, it won't

1812
01:42:01.439 --> 01:42:05.039
<v Speaker 1>be too difficult. And it's uh. When we were doing

1813
01:42:05.079 --> 01:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Muslim debates, we were encountering and dealing

1814
01:42:07.680 --> 01:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>with the sunny argumentation about occasionalism where's it at? And

1815
01:42:19.880 --> 01:42:31.800
<v Speaker 1>it actually ends up being another excellent way to refute Calvinism.

1816
01:42:31.920 --> 01:42:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Am I said, did I misspell occasionalism? I know what's

1817
01:42:34.079 --> 01:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>on here.

1818
01:42:34.520 --> 01:42:47.560
<v Speaker 25>Let's see.

1819
01:42:48.079 --> 01:42:52.439
<v Speaker 1>So for those that don't know, the classic Sunny position

1820
01:42:52.800 --> 01:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is the idea that that God all law cannot allow

1821
01:43:01.880 --> 01:43:06.079
<v Speaker 1>for secondary causes, so there can be creaturely causes. Right,

1822
01:43:06.560 --> 01:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So when we say that God is the original cause,

1823
01:43:08.640 --> 01:43:11.039
<v Speaker 1>the first cause, the direct cause, et cetera of the

1824
01:43:11.079 --> 01:43:14.720
<v Speaker 1>creation of the world or whatever. In the Islamic conception,

1825
01:43:16.239 --> 01:43:20.359
<v Speaker 1>they would say that if you allow for secondary causes,

1826
01:43:20.439 --> 01:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you're actually detracting from Allah's all powerfulness or his sovereignty.

1827
01:43:26.560 --> 01:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>And why that is I don't know, Like why could

1828
01:43:29.319 --> 01:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it not be? It's just an arbitrary assumption, right, Like

1829
01:43:31.560 --> 01:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>why could it not be the case that maybe being

1830
01:43:35.079 --> 01:43:39.520
<v Speaker 1>all powerful also includes a being that can create secondary causes,

1831
01:43:39.560 --> 01:43:44.319
<v Speaker 1>you see, So it's just sort of an assumption. Where

1832
01:43:44.399 --> 01:43:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is Lewis's here, It is classical Islam's unusual metaphysics. And

1833
01:43:50.079 --> 01:43:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this is Lewis's excellent documentary. It only got ten thousand

1834
01:43:53.079 --> 01:43:55.119
<v Speaker 1>views and Lewis put like a million hours into this

1835
01:43:56.119 --> 01:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>poor video. But this also refuse it's calvinism. If you

1836
01:44:02.000 --> 01:44:05.439
<v Speaker 1>watch this video and you understand it, it actually refutes

1837
01:44:05.479 --> 01:44:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Calvinism too. So here we are. We had twenty two

1838
01:44:08.399 --> 01:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred live and then we dropped to fifteen hundred as

1839
01:44:11.319 --> 01:44:13.840
<v Speaker 1>soon as I started talking about metaphysics. So notice how

1840
01:44:13.880 --> 01:44:17.039
<v Speaker 1>people just flee like the mirror mention of metaphysics. Do

1841
01:44:17.079 --> 01:44:19.479
<v Speaker 1>people just run, dude, They're just run for the hills.

1842
01:44:20.600 --> 01:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why so many people just have no

1843
01:44:22.720 --> 01:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>attention span and they're so just freaked out or like

1844
01:44:27.279 --> 01:44:30.039
<v Speaker 1>they're just like you mentioned a philosophical term and your

1845
01:44:30.119 --> 01:44:33.760
<v Speaker 1>your audience literally just immediately cuts in half. It's always

1846
01:44:33.760 --> 01:44:35.920
<v Speaker 1>been that way. It's crazy. You mentioned mention, a book

1847
01:44:36.119 --> 01:44:40.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned literary analysis. Boom, two thirds are gone. Doe, they

1848
01:44:40.640 --> 01:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hit the freaking door. They out this mother, So there

1849
01:44:47.600 --> 01:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>you go. This refutes Calvinism as well, because these are

1850
01:44:51.239 --> 01:44:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the metaphysical assumptions of Calvinism, absolutely identical to Sunni Islam.

1851
01:44:57.760 --> 01:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And I remember when I was to read the Puritans, right,

1852
01:45:01.520 --> 01:45:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading one time Jonathan Edwards in his sermons

1853
01:45:05.239 --> 01:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>actually making occasionalist arguments. He said that for God to

1854
01:45:09.039 --> 01:45:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be all powerful, he actually must at every millisecond destroy

1855
01:45:13.840 --> 01:45:18.039
<v Speaker 1>and recreate the world, otherwise there would be other causes,

1856
01:45:19.199 --> 01:45:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and thus God would not be the immediate direct cause. Right,

1857
01:45:22.680 --> 01:45:25.119
<v Speaker 1>So even though Calvinists give, as this guy said when

1858
01:45:25.119 --> 01:45:28.359
<v Speaker 1>he called in a verbal credence to quote free will,

1859
01:45:29.880 --> 01:45:32.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not really free will because it's all still the

1860
01:45:32.239 --> 01:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>direct divine decree that is the cause of every event.

1861
01:45:35.760 --> 01:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Well that's the Muslim position, dude, That's literally the Islamic

1862
01:45:40.000 --> 01:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>sunny occasionalist position. And it's really absurd if you think

1863
01:45:44.600 --> 01:45:47.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. So it's like, I'm not even the same

1864
01:45:48.079 --> 01:45:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Jay from two seconds ago. Right, And by the way,

1865
01:45:52.520 --> 01:45:55.399
<v Speaker 1>why is it one second or why is it one millisecond?

1866
01:45:55.640 --> 01:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, wouldn't it also be every nanosecond? It's just absurd.

1867
01:45:59.000 --> 01:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like just stupid stuff. And I mean you're not

1868
01:46:02.720 --> 01:46:05.399
<v Speaker 1>even going to find Muslims who even understand this, like

1869
01:46:05.920 --> 01:46:08.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe Jake, Like Jake is probably the only Muslim that

1870
01:46:08.399 --> 01:46:14.920
<v Speaker 1>can even talk about metaphysics. So so yeah, so that

1871
01:46:14.960 --> 01:46:17.680
<v Speaker 1>also works for a few Calvinism and the assumptions that

1872
01:46:17.880 --> 01:46:20.399
<v Speaker 1>underlie the reading of a text. So notice right there,

1873
01:46:20.800 --> 01:46:25.199
<v Speaker 1>you see that texts aren't self interpreting, like Calvinists and

1874
01:46:25.199 --> 01:46:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Protestants think, texts are replete with ambiguity and their theory

1875
01:46:33.239 --> 01:46:37.479
<v Speaker 1>laden and if texts are theory laden, then so are miracles,

1876
01:46:37.760 --> 01:46:42.159
<v Speaker 1>so are evidences. So we need a paradigm, and we

1877
01:46:42.199 --> 01:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>all have a paradigm through which we interpret the evidence

1878
01:46:46.079 --> 01:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is the facts, the texts, the miracles, the events, et cetera.

1879
01:46:51.760 --> 01:46:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully that's a helpful explanation. And that was my thinking

1880
01:46:54.720 --> 01:46:56.119
<v Speaker 1>when I was a Calvinist. I was like, well, I'm

1881
01:46:56.159 --> 01:46:58.279
<v Speaker 1>just trying to follow the clear meaning of the scriptures.

1882
01:46:59.159 --> 01:47:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to say, you know, I may not

1883
01:47:02.159 --> 01:47:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that God creates people for damnation, but

1884
01:47:04.760 --> 01:47:07.159
<v Speaker 1>who am I to challenge God? Right? And I thought

1885
01:47:07.159 --> 01:47:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that was the line of argument that Paul had in

1886
01:47:08.800 --> 01:47:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Romans nine. But then later on I remember being challenged.

1887
01:47:13.039 --> 01:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Even this was even during the when the Presbyterians were,

1888
01:47:17.760 --> 01:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>when Doug Wilson was first having his sect, when he

1889
01:47:20.720 --> 01:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>first created his CREC. I was in the Presbyterian circles

1890
01:47:24.600 --> 01:47:29.439
<v Speaker 1>at that time, and the schism happened because Doug Wilson,

1891
01:47:30.039 --> 01:47:31.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it wasn't because he was Orthodox, but

1892
01:47:32.199 --> 01:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>they started posing points that would actually lead eventually lead

1893
01:47:36.560 --> 01:47:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people into Orthodox here Catholicism. What they

1894
01:47:38.800 --> 01:47:41.399
<v Speaker 1>started saying things, well, wait a minute, Paul's letters and

1895
01:47:41.439 --> 01:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Ephesians are not written to the elect They're written to

1896
01:47:44.680 --> 01:47:48.800
<v Speaker 1>an actual visible community at Ephesus. And when that clicked

1897
01:47:48.800 --> 01:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>with me, I was like, wait a minute, well, that

1898
01:47:50.560 --> 01:47:53.199
<v Speaker 1>would mean he's calling the whole visible community the predestined.

1899
01:47:53.800 --> 01:47:59.359
<v Speaker 1>So then my visible invisible split a Nestorian ecclesiology started

1900
01:47:59.399 --> 01:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>falling apart. Even way back then when I was listening

1901
01:48:02.720 --> 01:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to Doug Wilson and what was called the Auburn Avenue Conference, right,

1902
01:48:07.399 --> 01:48:10.399
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of these Presbyterian OPC and PCA pastors did

1903
01:48:10.399 --> 01:48:13.680
<v Speaker 1>this conference under this I forget the guy's name who

1904
01:48:14.159 --> 01:48:19.159
<v Speaker 1>hosted the conference, but they argued for collective identity of

1905
01:48:19.199 --> 01:48:22.359
<v Speaker 1>the church with those types of texts, and they already

1906
01:48:22.399 --> 01:48:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for paido communion. And this was a huge deal in

1907
01:48:26.039 --> 01:48:31.079
<v Speaker 1>the Presbyterian world because Presbyterianism was so adamant about you know,

1908
01:48:32.319 --> 01:48:35.359
<v Speaker 1>paido baptism but not paido communion, just a really bizarre,

1909
01:48:35.439 --> 01:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of arbitrary position. And they started challenging that and

1910
01:48:37.960 --> 01:48:39.920
<v Speaker 1>arguing that, hey, maybe there's actually a biblical case for

1911
01:48:40.600 --> 01:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>paido communion. And then you start saying you start moving

1912
01:48:44.560 --> 01:48:47.079
<v Speaker 1>into thinking, well, wait a minute, if there's a biblical

1913
01:48:47.119 --> 01:48:49.840
<v Speaker 1>case for that, and a historical case. Then is there

1914
01:48:49.880 --> 01:48:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a biblical historical case for baptismal regeneration? You see how

1915
01:48:53.439 --> 01:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the dominoes begin to fall. So those were all definitely

1916
01:48:56.840 --> 01:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>elements that led me out of Calvinism a long time ago,

1917
01:49:00.079 --> 01:49:02.079
<v Speaker 1>and I wasn't ready for Orthodox yet. I just went,

1918
01:49:02.159 --> 01:49:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, straight into Rome because I thought, I thought,

1919
01:49:04.840 --> 01:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand and three, it was just sort

1920
01:49:06.600 --> 01:49:10.039
<v Speaker 1>of you're either Protestant or your Orthodox, I mean, or

1921
01:49:10.079 --> 01:49:12.439
<v Speaker 1>your Catholic. Right, there was that for most people even

1922
01:49:12.479 --> 01:49:16.479
<v Speaker 1>at that time. You know, you had Bonson debating Jerry Madditis,

1923
01:49:16.520 --> 01:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you had Scott Hahnd debating James White and Protestant people.

1924
01:49:23.760 --> 01:49:27.199
<v Speaker 1>You had Catholic apologists like Dave Armstrong and whoever else,

1925
01:49:27.960 --> 01:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and that was really all there was. Right. Nobody knew

1926
01:49:29.880 --> 01:49:33.880
<v Speaker 1>about Orthodox apologists, you know, Perry Robinson wasn't known yet.

1927
01:49:33.920 --> 01:49:37.439
<v Speaker 1>He was blogging perhaps, but there wasn't a big visible

1928
01:49:37.479 --> 01:49:42.039
<v Speaker 1>presence like there was for the Catholic Protestant debate, which

1929
01:49:42.039 --> 01:49:47.159
<v Speaker 1>had been going on for centuries obviously. So anyway, I'm rambling,

1930
01:49:47.159 --> 01:49:48.479
<v Speaker 1>but Elijah was something.

1931
01:49:52.760 --> 01:49:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Yell, hey, gil uh.

1932
01:49:56.159 --> 01:49:58.279
<v Speaker 11>So I had a I had a question that I

1933
01:49:58.319 --> 01:50:01.439
<v Speaker 11>was really hoping that Paul deacon In and I should

1934
01:50:01.439 --> 01:50:01.960
<v Speaker 11>be on here for.

1935
01:50:01.960 --> 01:50:04.840
<v Speaker 10>A bit, but i'll i'll just shoo shoot the shot.

1936
01:50:04.880 --> 01:50:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Anyways, So is it a dense tag question, because we've

1937
01:50:09.079 --> 01:50:11.560
<v Speaker 1>had several people trying to get like I'm trying to

1938
01:50:11.600 --> 01:50:17.359
<v Speaker 1>do Protestant versus Orthodox mainly here. Is it a tag question? No,

1939
01:50:17.399 --> 01:50:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not.

1940
01:50:18.479 --> 01:50:22.039
<v Speaker 2>It's a it's a scism great skills in question.

1941
01:50:22.560 --> 01:50:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1942
01:50:25.359 --> 01:50:30.680
<v Speaker 11>So now I'm going to preface my my question with

1943
01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:36.159
<v Speaker 11>saying that I am about the furthest person from an ecumenist.

1944
01:50:36.359 --> 01:50:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I am like it's the opposite of that.

1945
01:50:39.680 --> 01:50:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

1946
01:50:40.199 --> 01:50:43.640
<v Speaker 34>But there's one little thing that I'm kind of just

1947
01:50:43.680 --> 01:50:46.720
<v Speaker 34>like wondering about, and I'm kind of confused about, which

1948
01:50:46.760 --> 01:50:50.119
<v Speaker 34>is in the history of the Great Schism, It's it's

1949
01:50:50.159 --> 01:50:57.439
<v Speaker 34>pretty evident that the schism isn't actually like a clean overnight.

1950
01:50:58.119 --> 01:51:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I've made this argument for ten years, right, it

1951
01:51:01.039 --> 01:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>takes a few centuries for this to really like work

1952
01:51:03.920 --> 01:51:05.479
<v Speaker 1>its way out, right.

1953
01:51:06.039 --> 01:51:08.399
<v Speaker 11>So one of the things that I'm you know, one

1954
01:51:08.399 --> 01:51:10.560
<v Speaker 11>of the things I'm kind of saying is that with

1955
01:51:10.640 --> 01:51:15.520
<v Speaker 11>the other patriarchates besides Constantinople, it took even them kind

1956
01:51:15.560 --> 01:51:19.119
<v Speaker 11>of a little bit of time to recognize a schism,

1957
01:51:20.319 --> 01:51:22.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, push away to Rome saying they're not part

1958
01:51:22.920 --> 01:51:23.359
<v Speaker 11>of the church.

1959
01:51:23.439 --> 01:51:27.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, so I guess my question is that some of.

1960
01:51:27.319 --> 01:51:35.000
<v Speaker 10>The post schism Roman Catholic saints that are like immediately

1961
01:51:35.119 --> 01:51:38.319
<v Speaker 10>after the schism. I guess I'm just kind of wondering, like,

1962
01:51:39.640 --> 01:51:43.239
<v Speaker 10>is there a reason why even if the other Patriarchids

1963
01:51:43.279 --> 01:51:46.199
<v Speaker 10>are still communion with Rome for a long time after

1964
01:51:46.239 --> 01:51:50.039
<v Speaker 10>that schism, Like, why wouldn't some of those.

1965
01:51:49.960 --> 01:51:52.079
<v Speaker 2>Roman Catholic saints right afterwards not be.

1966
01:51:53.720 --> 01:51:56.159
<v Speaker 11>People that would have some grace or maybe they would

1967
01:51:56.199 --> 01:51:57.399
<v Speaker 11>be recognized as a saint.

1968
01:51:57.600 --> 01:52:00.199
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm just kind of curious on how that would work.

1969
01:52:01.399 --> 01:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't think we don't know. I mean, I

1970
01:52:03.000 --> 01:52:05.159
<v Speaker 1>think the one thing about Orthodoxy is that we're happy

1971
01:52:05.159 --> 01:52:07.199
<v Speaker 1>at times to say, you know, we leave that up

1972
01:52:07.239 --> 01:52:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to God. We don't have to make judgments about every

1973
01:52:10.000 --> 01:52:12.840
<v Speaker 1>single post schism saint. Obviously, I want to hope that

1974
01:52:13.199 --> 01:52:17.199
<v Speaker 1>everybody makes it, you know what I mean. But you

1975
01:52:17.199 --> 01:52:21.439
<v Speaker 1>know there's ambiguity too because we don't exactly know their

1976
01:52:21.479 --> 01:52:25.039
<v Speaker 1>status or how much they did and didn't know. Right.

1977
01:52:25.119 --> 01:52:29.319
<v Speaker 1>So for example, you know, Thomas Beckett, right like was

1978
01:52:29.359 --> 01:52:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Beckett believing in the double eternal hypostetic procession while

1979
01:52:33.159 --> 01:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he was a famous you know, Roman Catholic martyr in England,

1980
01:52:36.720 --> 01:52:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's post schism. I want to say,

1981
01:52:39.159 --> 01:52:39.399
<v Speaker 1>what is he?

1982
01:52:39.479 --> 01:52:39.520
<v Speaker 14>Like?

1983
01:52:39.560 --> 01:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Eleven hundreds? I mean, but maybe we don't have enough

1984
01:52:43.880 --> 01:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>writings to know did he one h a percent understand

1985
01:52:47.720 --> 01:52:51.039
<v Speaker 1>or even know what the Council b Lion said. So

1986
01:52:51.760 --> 01:52:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's why many cases it's just sort of ambergurity, as

1987
01:52:55.920 --> 01:52:58.520
<v Speaker 1>jesse Lei Peterson was saying, I mean to me, that

1988
01:52:58.560 --> 01:53:04.479
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, right, It's like for us, like you know,

1989
01:53:04.520 --> 01:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there was that ambigurity period where Saint Isaac the Syrian

1990
01:53:09.800 --> 01:53:13.319
<v Speaker 1>his group ended up being in communion with the Orthodox

1991
01:53:13.920 --> 01:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Church at that certain point, and thus we can say

1992
01:53:17.560 --> 01:53:21.079
<v Speaker 1>he was a saint. But you know, unless there's like

1993
01:53:21.720 --> 01:53:25.079
<v Speaker 1>some sort of like explicit evidence where okay, well they're

1994
01:53:25.079 --> 01:53:29.359
<v Speaker 1>actually saying And there's another point to make too. When

1995
01:53:29.399 --> 01:53:31.439
<v Speaker 1>all the Coptics got mad at me because I was

1996
01:53:31.479 --> 01:53:34.119
<v Speaker 1>saying that we can't add their martyrs to our calendar,

1997
01:53:34.159 --> 01:53:37.399
<v Speaker 1>It's like we're not saying that God can't you know,

1998
01:53:37.479 --> 01:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>extend grace to them and make them part of the

1999
01:53:39.439 --> 01:53:41.840
<v Speaker 1>mystical body. We don't know that. In fact, I hope

2000
01:53:41.840 --> 01:53:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that he does. I hope that all those people are

2001
01:53:43.920 --> 01:53:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in heaven. We don't want anybody to be damned. But

2002
01:53:46.880 --> 01:53:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean that we have to accept them in

2003
01:53:48.359 --> 01:53:51.199
<v Speaker 1>the calendar, right, And that's I think the confusion here

2004
01:53:51.239 --> 01:53:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is that people leave this element out and they just

2005
01:53:53.840 --> 01:53:57.720
<v Speaker 1>assume that, oh, well, you know, you got to say

2006
01:53:57.720 --> 01:54:00.119
<v Speaker 1>that the Coptic martyrs are saints. Well, saint for us

2007
01:54:00.279 --> 01:54:02.359
<v Speaker 1>means that they're going to be in the calendar. And

2008
01:54:02.399 --> 01:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not something that we want to extend to everybody,

2009
01:54:04.680 --> 01:54:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want to have, you know, angles by

2010
01:54:08.279 --> 01:54:12.600
<v Speaker 1>which people could exploit this for acumenism. So hopefully that

2011
01:54:12.720 --> 01:54:16.239
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But I think when you read the literature,

2012
01:54:16.279 --> 01:54:23.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, about the the course of the debate from

2013
01:54:23.800 --> 01:54:26.159
<v Speaker 1>the time of say Maximus all the way up to Florence,

2014
01:54:26.439 --> 01:54:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that's like almost that's eight hundred years of figuring out, Okay,

2015
01:54:31.119 --> 01:54:33.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys mean, Well, here's what we mean, right, so,

2016
01:54:34.560 --> 01:54:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't get dogmatized in the West until Lyons

2017
01:54:37.560 --> 01:54:41.239
<v Speaker 1>in Florence. So I'm happy to extend as much a

2018
01:54:41.359 --> 01:54:45.079
<v Speaker 1>charity throughout that period. So let's say, when was so

2019
01:54:45.279 --> 01:54:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Beckett was martyred like a century after the schism right,

2020
01:54:52.600 --> 01:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and he died before even the council Lions, So you know,

2021
01:54:58.039 --> 01:55:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and I would say even if he was recy a

2022
01:55:00.960 --> 01:55:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Phillyoquay Creed, you know, the same Aximus says, there's ambiguity

2023
01:55:05.840 --> 01:55:07.479
<v Speaker 1>in what they mean by that. Now, I think it's

2024
01:55:07.520 --> 01:55:12.000
<v Speaker 1>wrong to recite a Philioquay Creed. But do we have

2025
01:55:12.079 --> 01:55:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to say that this guy didn't give his life for Christ. No,

2026
01:55:14.800 --> 01:55:20.039
<v Speaker 1>because there's no explicit, identifiable means by which we can say, Okay,

2027
01:55:20.079 --> 01:55:23.319
<v Speaker 1>this guy was actually a heretic. Right, unless there is

2028
01:55:23.319 --> 01:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>some unknown treatise that I don't know about where Thomas

2029
01:55:25.560 --> 01:55:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Beckett is defending, you know, the phillyoquay or so maybe

2030
01:55:30.439 --> 01:55:32.319
<v Speaker 1>there is. I don't know, but I'm just giving an

2031
01:55:32.359 --> 01:55:36.439
<v Speaker 1>example from somebody that pops into my head. So but

2032
01:55:36.920 --> 01:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong about that. I'm not a I'm

2033
01:55:39.279 --> 01:55:41.680
<v Speaker 1>not an expert in this period of the twelfth century.

2034
01:55:41.760 --> 01:55:43.319
<v Speaker 1>So Kevin, what's something? Man?

2035
01:55:52.000 --> 01:55:52.560
<v Speaker 2>All right? Dad?

2036
01:55:52.920 --> 01:55:53.359
<v Speaker 14>That work?

2037
01:55:53.439 --> 01:55:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I just have myself, ag did you have a question.

2038
01:55:58.319 --> 01:56:02.399
<v Speaker 31>I just want to respond to the guy who asked

2039
01:56:02.399 --> 01:56:04.920
<v Speaker 31>about the cannon question, who said he was going to

2040
01:56:05.079 --> 01:56:06.319
<v Speaker 31>debate protest.

2041
01:56:06.399 --> 01:56:07.880
<v Speaker 35>That is a great I learned.

2042
01:56:07.640 --> 01:56:09.640
<v Speaker 31>A lot from you on that one, though, promise it

2043
01:56:09.840 --> 01:56:11.720
<v Speaker 31>has been able to answer.

2044
01:56:11.399 --> 01:56:15.079
<v Speaker 1>That for me yet, like how do we know you

2045
01:56:15.119 --> 01:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>know who wrote the books or who gave us the cannon?

2046
01:56:18.479 --> 01:56:21.479
<v Speaker 35>But I also thoroughly agree with what you said about

2047
01:56:21.520 --> 01:56:22.560
<v Speaker 35>not debating.

2048
01:56:22.159 --> 01:56:25.479
<v Speaker 31>Your parents because my dad were a non denom.

2049
01:56:25.359 --> 01:56:28.279
<v Speaker 35>Pastor and I've tried it to and dude, it's just yeah,

2050
01:56:28.399 --> 01:56:31.560
<v Speaker 35>at least, uh, just terrible stuff in the family and

2051
01:56:31.640 --> 01:56:33.319
<v Speaker 35>it's not what Christ wants.

2052
01:56:33.319 --> 01:56:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think no, and your parents, You're never going

2053
01:56:35.520 --> 01:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to convert your family members that way. They're the people

2054
01:56:37.640 --> 01:56:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that cleaned your diapers up. They're not going to listen

2055
01:56:40.039 --> 01:56:44.039
<v Speaker 1>to your theological you know, gibbering and jabbering for hours.

2056
01:56:44.079 --> 01:56:45.760
<v Speaker 1>They don't. They don't care about that. Toby, what's up?

2057
01:56:46.319 --> 01:56:46.479
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

2058
01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I would say there are some, you know, exceptions to

2059
01:56:50.239 --> 01:56:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that rule. I mean, if they ask you specifically, hold

2060
01:56:53.720 --> 01:56:57.199
<v Speaker 1>on a second, If your parents ask you specifically, you know, hey,

2061
01:56:57.279 --> 01:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>what is the theological understanding the Orthodox Church on the filial?

2062
01:57:00.560 --> 01:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Then yeah, you got to answer them when you shouldn't

2063
01:57:02.520 --> 01:57:05.039
<v Speaker 1>give give an answer. But you know, just don't debate

2064
01:57:05.079 --> 01:57:07.119
<v Speaker 1>your parents. Don't try to get everybody at you know,

2065
01:57:07.439 --> 01:57:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving dinner, you know, arguing over essence, inergy station or

2066
01:57:11.479 --> 01:57:12.239
<v Speaker 1>something like that. What's that?

2067
01:57:12.399 --> 01:57:14.279
<v Speaker 2>Man? Hi, how are you?

2068
01:57:15.760 --> 01:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Golod, what's up?

2069
01:57:17.439 --> 01:57:17.520
<v Speaker 22>Uh?

2070
01:57:17.720 --> 01:57:17.920
<v Speaker 18>Yeah?

2071
01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:23.479
<v Speaker 21>My question is so I'm a like just inquiring into

2072
01:57:23.520 --> 01:57:28.520
<v Speaker 21>Catholicism and Orthodoxy. And my question was I'm slightly leading

2073
01:57:28.560 --> 01:57:33.000
<v Speaker 21>towards Orthodoxy and I was just wondering what is probably

2074
01:57:33.039 --> 01:57:36.079
<v Speaker 21>the best church father to go through straightaway to read

2075
01:57:36.359 --> 01:57:40.680
<v Speaker 21>to become more knowledgeable about Orthodoxy.

2076
01:57:42.920 --> 01:57:45.079
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think one of the best routes you could

2077
01:57:45.079 --> 01:57:49.520
<v Speaker 1>take patristically is to read the Cappadocians, and you'll see

2078
01:57:49.640 --> 01:57:54.359
<v Speaker 1>that it's very different from what you get in Augustine. So, uh,

2079
01:57:55.479 --> 01:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the capital and the reason the capp Dotions matter so

2080
01:57:57.840 --> 01:58:01.560
<v Speaker 1>much is that for the Orthodox we hold an ecumenical

2081
01:58:01.560 --> 01:58:06.600
<v Speaker 1>council above any individual church father. Right, So as Augustin,

2082
01:58:06.680 --> 01:58:09.079
<v Speaker 1>as good as he was, like, if his theology is

2083
01:58:09.079 --> 01:58:12.720
<v Speaker 1>not accepted at the ecumenical council that defines the Trinity,

2084
01:58:13.199 --> 01:58:14.920
<v Speaker 1>then he's not going to have the same status for

2085
01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:18.520
<v Speaker 1>us as the Cappadocians would. So if Cappadocian theology is

2086
01:58:18.560 --> 01:58:22.479
<v Speaker 1>accepted at Constantinople one and It is then clearly Basil

2087
01:58:22.520 --> 01:58:25.199
<v Speaker 1>in the Holy Spirit, the theological orations of Saint Gregory

2088
01:58:25.439 --> 01:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>nazian Zeus and Saint Gregorissa's of various rieties, particularly you know,

2089
01:58:29.800 --> 01:58:31.600
<v Speaker 1>against Eunomius. But I'm not going to tell you to

2090
01:58:31.640 --> 01:58:33.479
<v Speaker 1>read Against Eunomius because it's going to be one of

2091
01:58:33.479 --> 01:58:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the most difficult books that you'll read. I would say

2092
01:58:35.920 --> 01:58:39.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on Basil and the Holy Spirit, Basils against Eunomius

2093
01:58:40.199 --> 01:58:43.079
<v Speaker 1>and Sant Gregor not sianzras Is theological Orations, because they

2094
01:58:43.119 --> 01:58:48.159
<v Speaker 1>will give you the best introduction to the Orthodox Catholic

2095
01:58:48.199 --> 01:58:51.520
<v Speaker 1>mindset on the Trinity and the hyposthetic property, the Father

2096
01:58:51.560 --> 01:58:54.239
<v Speaker 1>being the sole cause, all of which is really just

2097
01:58:54.920 --> 01:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>very different from the speculative ideas that Augustin comes up

2098
01:58:58.720 --> 01:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with from Neo Plaianism and from Plotinus's and neod It's

2099
01:59:01.960 --> 01:59:04.319
<v Speaker 1>about how to try to defend phillyoquay and that kind

2100
01:59:04.359 --> 01:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. So and again, people who are the Latinizers

2101
01:59:07.600 --> 01:59:10.079
<v Speaker 1>like they act like the latinizing is just this issue

2102
01:59:10.079 --> 01:59:13.239
<v Speaker 1>that deals with like psa or something latinizing. It also

2103
01:59:13.399 --> 01:59:19.840
<v Speaker 1>includes things like Augustine literally cribbing multiple sections of the

2104
01:59:19.880 --> 01:59:24.079
<v Speaker 1>fourth or fifth in ead to prove the phillyoquay. So

2105
01:59:24.119 --> 01:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like they don't even realize how deep that that goes.

2106
01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's just not part of what we do, Like

2107
01:59:30.079 --> 01:59:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not into that. And Augustin himself said he would

2108
01:59:32.960 --> 01:59:36.399
<v Speaker 1>submit his book to the judgment of the Universal Church.

2109
01:59:36.520 --> 01:59:37.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he didn't say I'm going to send

2110
01:59:37.800 --> 01:59:40.239
<v Speaker 1>it to Rome, because Rome is the final arbiter. He said,

2111
01:59:40.279 --> 01:59:43.279
<v Speaker 1>the Universal Church can decide, and the Universal Church said,

2112
01:59:43.319 --> 01:59:47.079
<v Speaker 1>we affirm the Cappudocian teaching. So there you and the

2113
01:59:47.119 --> 01:59:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Cappudocan teaching is clearly not the same as the Augustinian teaching.

2114
01:59:51.760 --> 01:59:53.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to go very far in on the

2115
01:59:54.000 --> 01:59:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Trinity and the Cappadocians to see that. Well, Emmanuel says,

2116
01:59:58.960 --> 02:00:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this may not be hambergurity, but it might cover it.

2117
02:00:02.079 --> 02:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. He sends fifty Mexican pesos for ambiguity, Anthony

2118
02:00:07.760 --> 02:00:13.159
<v Speaker 1>or something. I thought it was like three in the morning.

2119
02:00:13.159 --> 02:00:17.199
<v Speaker 1>It's only midnight, so we're doing good. What's up man, Hey.

2120
02:00:17.159 --> 02:00:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Jay, thanks for posting this.

2121
02:00:21.039 --> 02:00:28.119
<v Speaker 7>Kurt Kurt Mormon inquiring into Orthodoxy, Good and Divine Liturgy,

2122
02:00:29.159 --> 02:00:33.439
<v Speaker 7>pamful of Times, and a couple of services during Holy Week,

2123
02:00:35.960 --> 02:00:37.600
<v Speaker 7>So well, one.

2124
02:00:38.039 --> 02:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I just love your your prayers and prayers from your community.

2125
02:00:43.159 --> 02:00:45.079
<v Speaker 7>I got a wife and five kids that are all

2126
02:00:45.199 --> 02:00:48.680
<v Speaker 7>very very Mormon still and not interested at all.

2127
02:00:49.159 --> 02:00:51.119
<v Speaker 2>Uh and uh, you.

2128
02:00:51.079 --> 02:00:53.479
<v Speaker 7>Know and exploring anything outside of it.

2129
02:00:54.720 --> 02:00:57.119
<v Speaker 2>And UH for me right now, what.

2130
02:00:57.119 --> 02:01:00.439
<v Speaker 7>I'm struggling with because you know, coming from the paradigm

2131
02:01:00.439 --> 02:01:04.880
<v Speaker 7>of Mormonism and praying about you know what's true and

2132
02:01:04.920 --> 02:01:08.079
<v Speaker 7>getting the indigestion and you know, burning the bosom and

2133
02:01:08.439 --> 02:01:12.119
<v Speaker 7>you know that being the confirmation, all the confirmation you

2134
02:01:12.159 --> 02:01:18.760
<v Speaker 7>need to know something is true. As I study Orthodoxy

2135
02:01:19.000 --> 02:01:24.079
<v Speaker 7>and attend, I'm really really skeptical of my feelings. I've

2136
02:01:24.159 --> 02:01:27.000
<v Speaker 7>kind of gone, you know, almost a complete other direction

2137
02:01:27.119 --> 02:01:30.880
<v Speaker 7>where I'm so afraid of preless that I don't I

2138
02:01:30.920 --> 02:01:33.000
<v Speaker 7>don't want to trust that you know, I'm having a

2139
02:01:33.039 --> 02:01:36.720
<v Speaker 7>good experience or I'm feeling peaceful here because I don't

2140
02:01:36.760 --> 02:01:39.159
<v Speaker 7>want to be deceived by by any of those feelings.

2141
02:01:39.239 --> 02:01:43.239
<v Speaker 7>So how what what advice can you give me on

2142
02:01:43.680 --> 02:01:47.760
<v Speaker 7>council that how to guess how to navigate that? And

2143
02:01:49.720 --> 02:01:51.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, I'm not necessarily looking for how do I

2144
02:01:51.760 --> 02:01:54.960
<v Speaker 7>know it's true? I think that probably just maybe comes

2145
02:01:55.000 --> 02:01:59.159
<v Speaker 7>to me over a long experience and you know, going

2146
02:01:59.199 --> 02:02:01.439
<v Speaker 7>to divine edery and doing more study.

2147
02:02:01.560 --> 02:02:05.800
<v Speaker 2>But how do I not shut off?

2148
02:02:05.920 --> 02:02:09.720
<v Speaker 7>I guess those good you know, feelings and things that

2149
02:02:09.800 --> 02:02:13.199
<v Speaker 7>might be coming from from God versus you know.

2150
02:02:14.800 --> 02:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I think again, like the experience. You just

2151
02:02:18.800 --> 02:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>have to judge the feelings and the experiences by the

2152
02:02:22.680 --> 02:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Orthodox theological tradition and also in concert with your spiritual father. Right,

2153
02:02:27.760 --> 02:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So when you've got Orthodox, you'll have a person that

2154
02:02:29.880 --> 02:02:32.479
<v Speaker 1>will be kind of like the person that you bounce

2155
02:02:32.520 --> 02:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of questions off.

2156
02:02:33.880 --> 02:02:34.039
<v Speaker 2>Right.

2157
02:02:34.079 --> 02:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you feel like, oh, you know, I had

2158
02:02:35.840 --> 02:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this dream and I feel like God's moved me to

2159
02:02:37.920 --> 02:02:41.279
<v Speaker 1>do this, and that you'll bounce that off of other people.

2160
02:02:41.920 --> 02:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Orthodoxy has those checks and balances at

2161
02:02:44.520 --> 02:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the firewall, which you know, like these evangelical charismatic sects

2162
02:02:48.560 --> 02:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and groups they don't have that. So they're very very

2163
02:02:50.760 --> 02:02:54.439
<v Speaker 1>much prime, uh you know, candidates for the creation of

2164
02:02:54.520 --> 02:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>cults because people start thinking like, you know, and Lee

2165
02:02:57.800 --> 02:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>does that, Oh, Jesus and Mary are talking to me,

2166
02:03:00.039 --> 02:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm actually the new Mary because I had this

2167
02:03:02.840 --> 02:03:05.039
<v Speaker 1>vision in the infirmary and all this kind of stuff,

2168
02:03:05.039 --> 02:03:09.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'm the new female savior. Feminist Jesus and all

2169
02:03:09.399 --> 02:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this insanity. Right, that's all an extreme example of her delusions.

2170
02:03:12.640 --> 02:03:16.199
<v Speaker 1>But it's exactly what I'm saying. It's like, there's no

2171
02:03:16.439 --> 02:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>guard rails for that type of an attitude. And even

2172
02:03:20.680 --> 02:03:24.439
<v Speaker 1>though she's an extreme version of the charismatic stuff, it's

2173
02:03:24.479 --> 02:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a it's a it's the point is it still stands.

2174
02:03:26.760 --> 02:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Right.

2175
02:03:26.920 --> 02:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like in Mormonism, people forget Mormonism is also a

2176
02:03:29.680 --> 02:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>charismatic faith that they believe in ongoing public revelation. Some

2177
02:03:33.960 --> 02:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Mormon schisms and sex believe in like glossalalia

2178
02:03:38.000 --> 02:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and and new interpreting of tongues and all kinds of nonsense.

2179
02:03:43.880 --> 02:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So so I think if as long as you're bouncing

2180
02:03:48.760 --> 02:03:51.319
<v Speaker 1>it off of your spiritual Father and you're within the

2181
02:03:51.840 --> 02:03:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the guard rails that are established, you don't have to

2182
02:03:56.439 --> 02:04:00.319
<v Speaker 1>worry about you know, I'm not going to be sieved

2183
02:04:00.399 --> 02:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, Right, I think I think we're

2184
02:04:04.039 --> 02:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the most sort of
