Speaker 1: Coming up on the show bounties on people publicly put
Speaker 1: out by the government. I just ah, you know it.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you, it is very difficult each and
Speaker 1: every day as you churn through all of this stuff.
Speaker 1: And when I say all of this stuff, I mean
Speaker 1: you hear I don't know, maybe a third, no, that
Speaker 1: far less than that. You hear a minuscule portion of
Speaker 1: the amount of stories and links and weird emails and
Speaker 1: just randomness social media stuff. Obviously that every single day
Speaker 1: I kind of churned through. You know, some of it's
Speaker 1: just scan and passed. But the amount of I was watching.
Speaker 1: I was watching some police videos this morning for no
Speaker 1: good reason. Just happened to be. I just I fell
Speaker 1: into that rabbit hole. And I find myself doing that,
Speaker 1: and then I find myself reading other stories stuff that
Speaker 1: did make it into the stack. And it becomes very
Speaker 1: difficult if by design, as you read through all of this,
Speaker 1: to not get a little conspiratorial on stuff. Okay, and
Speaker 1: just because it's a conspiracy doesn't mean it's not true.
Speaker 1: And and and we can recognize that conspiracy can be
Speaker 1: a word that simply is that is that you are
Speaker 1: correct about something that is not fully flushed out yet.
Speaker 1: So let me give you would be a good example
Speaker 1: of what we well, Russ is just telling me something
Speaker 1: off the air, right right. And and here we had
Speaker 1: the story yesterday with Janet Jackson. So if you don't remember,
Speaker 1: Janet Jackson made a comment during an interview, and I
Speaker 1: don't have it in front of me, but basically the
Speaker 1: comment was, oh, okay, all right, all right. And so
Speaker 1: the comment was some along the lines of I heard
Speaker 1: she referring to Kamala Harris. I heard that she was Indian.
Speaker 1: I heard her. I and it's very important here, she says,
Speaker 1: I heard, I heard, and it's it's it's it's pretty innocuous.
Speaker 1: I heard she was Indian. Somebody said that her father
Speaker 1: was white. Okay, Janet is literally repeating what somebody told her,
Speaker 1: and that's it. She doesn't dwell on it, she doesn't
Speaker 1: go any further into it. And then everyone got upset
Speaker 1: with her. And then some moonbat pretended to be her spokesperson,
Speaker 1: pretended to be her spokesperson, posted something on social media
Speaker 1: that looked kind of like an official statement apologizing, and
Speaker 1: Janet then had to speak up and go, I don't
Speaker 1: know who the hell that is. That's that's that's not
Speaker 1: They don't speak for me. I don't even know who
Speaker 1: that is. My my manager is Randy Jackson, for her brother,
Speaker 1: and so the only official statements come from him. And
Speaker 1: and then that was it. That was the whole I
Speaker 1: guess a statement that she made. I would say the
Speaker 1: second statement, but it's the only legitimate one. And then
Speaker 1: she didn't apologize, and everyone was very upset. And so
Speaker 1: we did that story yesterday. But do you know why
Speaker 1: this whole thing may have come to pass? See, that's
Speaker 1: the rest of the story, right, And I saw people
Speaker 1: formulating conspiracies. I saw that the way that they wrote
Speaker 1: about Randy Jackson, they wrote her her actual spokesperson is
Speaker 1: Randy Jackson, who has a history of putting out crazy
Speaker 1: stuff or whatever. I can't remember how they worded it,
Speaker 1: but they, you know, they undercut him in the thing.
Speaker 1: And then I had to go instead of now researching
Speaker 1: why Janet thought that, you know, or who told her that,
Speaker 1: or if there's anything going on now I'm trying to
Speaker 1: figure out, well, wait a sec, this did I don't
Speaker 1: remember Randy Jackson story. I remember the whole family is interesting, okay, right,
Speaker 1: the whole you know, the whole story of the uh
Speaker 1: you know, the the dad and when they were kids
Speaker 1: and the way that the father treated them up to
Speaker 1: obviously the the oddities of Michael and Janet and uh
Speaker 1: and and Tito and LaToya. Remember what remember what a
Speaker 1: what a absolute dumpster fire it was when LaToya decided
Speaker 1: she wanted to show everyone everything and do that Playboy
Speaker 1: thing back in the day, and that really, I mean
Speaker 1: that was really an era.
Speaker 2: Man.
Speaker 1: I know, everyone sits here and we talk about all
Speaker 1: of the singers and entertainers. Right, they'll do some Vogue
Speaker 1: magazine thing and they're basically naked and like, well, why
Speaker 1: are you doing that? Or or they'll they'll they'll put
Speaker 1: something on the insta. Right, it's no different than my
Speaker 1: era back in the day. If if you were if
Speaker 1: you were a celebrity and you were looking to pivot,
Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe your image or whatever you do
Speaker 1: a Playboy spread it was. I mean think about like
Speaker 1: Drew Barrymore. It's gonna disturb some of you the amount
Speaker 1: of working knowledge I have here, but you know Drew Barrymore, right,
Speaker 1: very very wholesome image there. And she decided, look, I'm
Speaker 1: not that kid from et no more and she was not.
Speaker 1: I will I will second that, and various others also,
Speaker 1: and you still have some of this today. If you
Speaker 1: got fifteen minutes of fame or you were part of
Speaker 1: a story, it could be the most horrific story possible.
Speaker 1: You would you would you would go and you do
Speaker 1: a Playboy spread or maybe a video would drop or whatever.
Speaker 1: I mean, let's let's face it. Tanya Harding and Amy
Speaker 1: Fisher both did things that was just that was what
Speaker 1: was going on there. So and and I kind of
Speaker 1: pivoted over to this because you have all of this
Speaker 1: stuff to turn from as to what may be the
Speaker 1: history that brought this about. Now we go a step
Speaker 1: further here on the show, all right, and that is
Speaker 1: we wanted some context on this. So I looked up
Speaker 1: the Randy Jackson thing. Do you know what Randy jack
Speaker 1: Do you know what Randy Jackson's crazy stuff that he
Speaker 1: put out there? He people who embrace Satanism and and
Speaker 1: use demonic and satanic imagery, that's the crazy. He said
Speaker 1: that there are people in the music industry that are
Speaker 1: all in on the satan stuff, whether it's portrayed that
Speaker 1: way or whether they actually are. That might be the
Speaker 1: truest statement ever. Do you know the Mayor of New
Speaker 1: York's Buddy is under investigation right now for a music
Speaker 1: video that I guess he had some hand in helping
Speaker 1: to set up. That was filmed in a Catholic church
Speaker 1: that is shock full of the Satan stuff. As you
Speaker 1: can imagine that rubs some Catholics the wrong way. And
Speaker 1: it's it's done absolutely with the imagery Sam Smith, and
Speaker 1: you don't look. You can go back, you know, the
Speaker 1: Rob Zombie study, and it doesn't mean that I think
Speaker 1: that they're at home practicing it. On the flip side,
Speaker 1: I think the funniest thing is when we get a
Speaker 1: glimpse of somebody who attempts to portray that image when
Speaker 1: they don't think that people are watching being really, really normal.
Speaker 1: Do you remember that story in Florida of the the
Speaker 1: heavy metal I can't remember the name of the band,
Speaker 1: but you had some dude who was in like a
Speaker 1: super duper like screamy death metal band and like what
Speaker 1: did he do? He ended up burning his own house down,
Speaker 1: and you go and see his house and it's like
Speaker 1: white picket fence city man or Pazuzu, Lord of the
Speaker 1: Demons the famous story from Clemens. If you haven't been
Speaker 1: here for about ten years, you probably don't remember this.
Speaker 1: So this dude and his girlfriend apparently took turns killing
Speaker 1: people and then buried the bodies in the yard. And
Speaker 1: I think it was he killed first and then she
Speaker 1: killed so to gain trust or whatever. But there's this
Speaker 1: video when they actually raided their house and Clemens, yes
Speaker 1: that Clemens, right right here in the Triad, raided his house.
Speaker 1: And they go in and the first room, you know,
Speaker 1: like the main room is exactly what you think, right.
Speaker 1: You got pentagrams, you got black candles, you got all
Speaker 1: this stuff you'd set up. And they're going room by
Speaker 1: room and it's more and more disturbing, and they're in
Speaker 1: the hallway and they open this closet and it is
Speaker 1: perfectly organized. It looks it looks like an absolute neat
Speaker 1: freak lives there, and it's clearly her stuff. And I
Speaker 1: don't know why, but I just found it hilarious that
Speaker 1: you live in the you know, you live in a
Speaker 1: hellscape in the rest of your house, quite literally by design.
Speaker 1: And yet she's like, that's my closet, that's my space,
Speaker 1: and it looks like a professional organizer had come in there.
Speaker 1: I find all of this stuff hilarious. So no, Randy
Speaker 1: Jackson is not crazy to sit there and say that
Speaker 1: that's a thing. And as far as the the story
Speaker 1: I was referring to, I don't know this artist, and
Speaker 1: I guess that makes me old, but I don't care.
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not familiar with her, with her work.
Speaker 1: I know she's a big deal and for many of you,
Speaker 1: you probably have kids who are into this Sabrina Carpenter.
Speaker 1: I don't know any of her songs. Maybe I do.
Speaker 1: I'm sure I've probably heard it if she's really really
Speaker 1: popped it ross. Do you know any songs by Sabrina
Speaker 1: Carpenter or anything about her? I feel like this is
Speaker 1: my absolutely nun Yeah, dude, like I feel like you
Speaker 1: and I used to have at least a passing understanding
Speaker 1: of artists, but both coming from music. You work music
Speaker 1: a lot longer than I did, but or at least
Speaker 1: that type of music. I did country for a very
Speaker 1: long time. But I don't know anything about Sabrina Carpenter.
Speaker 1: But I know that she went into a church in
Speaker 1: Brooklyn and she's wearing a black dress. Basically, nothing of
Speaker 1: the black skirt, nothing underneath, and the imagery of the
Speaker 1: whole thing is is very very dark. In fact, in
Speaker 1: the video, which features a scantly clime reading the description
Speaker 1: a scantly clad carpenter dancing in the church next to
Speaker 1: a cough and emblazoned with rip B word and a
Speaker 1: bunch of other stuff. Now there's a whole investigation over this, dude.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna get into the full details of that story.
Speaker 1: I don't even know if I'll do it, but I
Speaker 1: wanted to passively mention it. So Randy Jackson is is,
Speaker 1: That's what's going on here, right, But he's dead on
Speaker 1: and again. So for whatever reason, and I guess I'm
Speaker 1: assuming because it hurts Kamala a little. They have to
Speaker 1: sit there and the reporter's got to make a snipe
Speaker 1: about what's going on. So why did this whole thing start?
Speaker 1: I'll tell you why this thing started. So Ross has
Speaker 1: brought this to my attention. We got the okay, we
Speaker 1: got the audio. All right, check this out. This is
Speaker 1: why apparently there's beef with the Jackson family.
Speaker 3: You're gonna say real quick, it's from ABC News. The
Speaker 3: thing they did in two thousand and four.
Speaker 1: Okay, so it's not new. So ABC News has this information.
Speaker 3: These are old clips. It's an old clip from two
Speaker 3: thousand and four. And then it switches to CNN with
Speaker 3: the Trump So there's two different there's two or three
Speaker 3: different cuts here, but they're all along the same timeline.
Speaker 1: All right, it's all in this news package. All right,
Speaker 1: here's a here we go. Let's let's learn.
Speaker 3: That could mean life in prison.
Speaker 4: And cases like this can depend on the testimony of
Speaker 4: the child accuser.
Speaker 1: In general, the child will be able to recall and
Speaker 1: recollect with some detail. But just to be clear, we're
Speaker 1: talking about Michael's trial.
Speaker 3: Right, yeah, yeah. The video shows photo it's an ABC
Speaker 3: News composite and it shows like clips of Michael Jackson
Speaker 3: and hit like his mugshott all.
Speaker 1: The kind of stuff, which is yeah, okay, all right.
Speaker 1: And then they go to the price by the way
Speaker 1: in Santa Barbara County, but up in a city called
Speaker 1: Santa Maria's where they actually did the trial, right, And.
Speaker 3: Then they go to Kamala Harris on the street talking
Speaker 3: about you know, cases like this in general.
Speaker 1: Okay, all right, and here we got incident and that
Speaker 1: is persuasive to a jury even if it is the
Speaker 1: only testimony.
Speaker 5: That is available Jackson.
Speaker 1: To be clear, she's not the prosecutor. I just want
Speaker 1: to be clear. This is what I'm telling you. Santa
Speaker 1: Barbara is in southern California. She's up there. This is
Speaker 1: pre herbian ag. Okay, he gave a wave when he
Speaker 1: was released after booking. He's scheduled for arraignment in January.
Speaker 3: Michael's been a long time resident of Trump Tower. Last
Speaker 3: night that Donald strongly reiterated his defense of Jackson with
Speaker 3: Larry King by going after the accuser's mother.
Speaker 5: She's had plenty of experience at going after people that
Speaker 5: she goes after him viciously and violently. And I saw
Speaker 5: a story and I read another story about some of
Speaker 5: the things she's done, and I don't believe.
Speaker 1: It, but you know what it's like when an indictment
Speaker 1: comes down.
Speaker 5: It's tough, it's presumption, it's tough. It's tough to win.
Speaker 5: But I have a feeling that's gonna win. The interesting
Speaker 5: thing is I've known Michael from many different standpoints, and
Speaker 5: Michael would spend a lot of time with my kids.
Speaker 5: I have beautiful kids, and at the time, like at
Speaker 5: mar A Lago and even in Trump Tower. The kids
Speaker 5: were very young, Michael would come play with the kids.
Speaker 5: He just loved children. He was not a child molester.
Speaker 5: And I am certain of that. He loved children. He'd
Speaker 5: play with my son Eric and my son Donald, and
Speaker 5: he'd just play with them forever. He loved children. But
Speaker 5: he was not a child molester. And you know, that
Speaker 5: whole final saga of Neverland and the police and what
Speaker 5: they did was I think a very very very bad
Speaker 5: part of Michael's life.
Speaker 1: So to sum it up with those clips, basically Janis
Speaker 1: thing might be Kamalas sitting there trash talking her brother.
Speaker 1: Trump's defending him. Okay, a little more, a lot more
Speaker 1: to the story. I don't know that I necessarily agree
Speaker 1: with Trump on that, even like it if if you've
Speaker 1: read as thoroughly as I mean with it with the
Speaker 1: Jesus juice that we're not going to get into all
Speaker 1: this stuff, right, I don't know. I think Trump believes that,
Speaker 1: but I but I don't think it was just this woman.
Speaker 1: I mean, remember, we had a lot of different stuff.
Speaker 3: Right, right, and a lot of stuff has come out,
Speaker 3: but it shows, like you know, where Janet's head could
Speaker 3: possibly be. Oh yeah, it's deeper than what's on the surface, possibly.
Speaker 1: So, so they're making little snipe comments about her brother
Speaker 1: basically to uh, I can't believe she didn't apologize and
Speaker 1: her actual guy, he's a lunatic who puts fake stuff
Speaker 1: out that there's satanic imagery and music. It's also dumb man,
Speaker 1: all right, So I just want to update that story
Speaker 1: as we kick things off this morning since it was
Speaker 1: fresh on the brain. All right. So, uh, like I said,
Speaker 1: it's hard to be conspiratorial, and uh I, Yet yesterday
Speaker 1: was yet another reason why. And it had to do
Speaker 1: with the document that part of a court filing and
Speaker 1: understand understandably, so that was insta public and some folks
Speaker 1: have noted some differences between this incident and another one.
Speaker 1: I'll fill you in next hang on, maybe somebody can
Speaker 1: help it make sense. And I saw people go, well,
Speaker 1: one is a federal investigation and the other one was
Speaker 1: a state investigation, so you know, different rules, different laws.
Speaker 1: And here's the deal. That's not true. The part that
Speaker 1: they are one is a federal thing and one was
Speaker 1: a state thing, is correct. I'm referring to the second
Speaker 1: attempt in a very short period at assassinating the former
Speaker 1: President Trump, mister Ruth Routh whatever, don't care, don't care
Speaker 1: to learn his name. I hope you put him in general, pop,
Speaker 1: let's see what happens. And of course the transhooter down
Speaker 1: at in Tennessee, at the Christian school there, and specifically
Speaker 1: things that you know, documents that they have created, because
Speaker 1: obviously you remember getting the manifesto was immediately barred. In fact,
Speaker 1: people lost their jobs for sharing pictures of I think
Speaker 1: what four pages or something that that that was its
Speaker 1: own big investigation. And the reasoning that we were told
Speaker 1: at the time is this document is incendiary and if
Speaker 1: people read it, it will cause the potential for harm
Speaker 1: to members of the LGBTQ community. That was the narrative,
Speaker 1: and they fought tooth and nail to not release it.
Speaker 1: And then once they released it, it was as backcrap
Speaker 1: insane as you thought it was going to be. But
Speaker 1: how they thought it was going to spur that on
Speaker 1: was beside me. It was about not putting it out
Speaker 1: there because not because you feared for somebody's safety. It
Speaker 1: was not putting it out there because you feared how
Speaker 1: it could change people's perception of a hot button issue.
Speaker 1: So that's not a conspiracy. And you couldn't convince me
Speaker 1: otherwise because I wouldn't believe you that was propaganda ish
Speaker 1: without putting the propaganda out. Now we have a document
Speaker 1: that was reportedly penned by the guy who was able
Speaker 1: to lay in wait for hours on the Marlaco golf
Speaker 1: course in what they referred to as a blind spot.
Speaker 1: Would they refer to as a blind spot? There, Well,
Speaker 1: a whoopsie, right, And thankfully he didn't get a chance
Speaker 1: to shoot at the former president, but I think he
Speaker 1: would gladly and we'd be right back here having a
Speaker 1: very different conversation. And he wrote to document, and in
Speaker 1: the document he talks about how he was he's offering
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty to quote finish
Speaker 1: the job. That document was released. It was part of
Speaker 1: a filing and and by the way it's it's correctly
Speaker 1: part of a filing. What they were filing was documents.
Speaker 1: So at a bail hearing, the judge wouldn't give him bail.
Speaker 1: They said, look here he is not only is he
Speaker 1: not remorseful, he wrote this hoping that somebody would then
Speaker 1: help him carry out what was what he was attempting
Speaker 1: to do, which is an assassination. So yes, you do
Speaker 1: include that, but there are mechanisms within the federal government.
Speaker 1: And I didn't just go I'm not a lawyer, Ross.
Speaker 1: Would you check and make sure I'm not a lawyer.
Speaker 1: I don't want people thinking I'm a lawyer.
Speaker 3: I machine you are not.
Speaker 1: I am not a lawyer. However, I read several social
Speaker 1: media posting by people who are lawyers and said that
Speaker 1: document could have remained under seal, and there is a
Speaker 1: mechanism for that. So don't give me any of this garbage. So,
Speaker 1: like I said, it's really hard not to believe conspiracies,
Speaker 1: But what are you left to believe? What are you
Speaker 1: left to believe? When they'll gladly put that And before
Speaker 1: you say, well, you know the FEDS have how many
Speaker 1: different documents have the Feds decided that they wouldn't release
Speaker 1: over a variety of stories. Hell, they won't give Congress
Speaker 1: information from some of these agencies. So I don't want
Speaker 1: to hear that. Do you ever see the movie Swat? Ross?
Speaker 1: Everse Swatted? Not the TV show but the movie. I'm
Speaker 1: trying to think who all was in that movie? It was, Oh,
Speaker 1: the Irish actor was the main dude in that, Colin Farrell.
Speaker 1: Colin Ferrell, Yeah, I have not seen it, Okay, So
Speaker 1: basically it's it's about la swat. It's it's it's a
Speaker 1: I don't want to say it's a cheesy, but it's
Speaker 1: you know, it's a it's an action thrill. It's good.
Speaker 1: It's okay.
Speaker 3: Actually I think you think maybe I did see it.
Speaker 5: Well.
Speaker 1: One of the one of the premise in the in
Speaker 1: the movie is they're also moving prisoners and they arrest
Speaker 1: this really high profile like South American drug dealer, right,
Speaker 1: very suave dude. He's up there. He got busted. He
Speaker 1: got busted basically with a fake passport or some They
Speaker 1: take him into custdy whatever. Well it's a big, big,
Speaker 1: big deal because of who this is. I think he's
Speaker 1: a terrorist too. He's drug drug king pen terrorists. Right,
Speaker 1: he's super he's the baddest of batties. And they arrest
Speaker 1: him and there's a scene where they're moving him to
Speaker 1: a transport vehicle and at a prison or into a
Speaker 1: prison from a transport vehicle and he's got a walk
Speaker 1: which is totally unrealistic, as anyone in law enforcement knows.
Speaker 1: You guys, you guys, what is it? You guys have
Speaker 1: a sally port usually probably for this reason. But in
Speaker 1: the movie, they've got to move him like I don't know,
Speaker 1: one hundred feet and there's crowds and there's like horned
Speaker 1: up women cheering and stuff, and the media is there,
Speaker 1: and he turns to the camera and says, I will
Speaker 1: offer I don't know, some stupid number, like one hundred
Speaker 1: million dollars for anyone who gets me out of here,
Speaker 1: and they put him in there. Well as you can imagine,
Speaker 1: then the plot point is everyone who wants the bounty.
Speaker 1: And I won't tell you who's all in on it,
Speaker 1: but it's you know, if you're just looking for to
Speaker 1: turn your brain off for two hours and watch stuff
Speaker 1: blow up, go watch it. So like that premise has
Speaker 1: already you know, that's a premise that already exists. You're
Speaker 1: telling me that nobody within the federal government thought to
Speaker 1: themselves if we put a we're doing the swap thing,
Speaker 1: it's maybe not one hundred million dollars, but a one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand. You don't think there's lunatics that
Speaker 1: would look at that and go all right, I hate
Speaker 1: the guy anyway, or more importantly, the famous factor for it,
Speaker 1: because now you're the guy who's attached to the other
Speaker 1: high profile thing. Now will something come of it? Hopefully not.
Speaker 1: But they've just tried to kill the dude twice, wounding
Speaker 1: him once. What happened to Aerin on the side of
Speaker 1: caution for this? Now would people be screaming about not
Speaker 1: all of his dogs coming out of there? Yes, but
Speaker 1: there's a way to explain it, and some people aren't
Speaker 1: going to believe it, but it is. It is the
Speaker 1: appropriate use of what's going on. Well, you saw in
Speaker 1: Tennessee was not appropriate use that was that was politics, man,
Speaker 1: And you go ahead and release this thing. How do
Speaker 1: you how do you and everyone involved in this, from
Speaker 1: the judge to the lawyers, How about the lawyers for
Speaker 1: the government who are prosecuting this guy, whose job, for
Speaker 1: all practical purposes is to is to prosecute this so
Speaker 1: that the threat's not there, but also we prosecute as
Speaker 1: a deterrent. So you want to prosecute as a deterrent. Now,
Speaker 1: granted you're dealing with people who would shoot a president
Speaker 1: or a former president, deterrens may not work with them.
Speaker 1: I understand that, but you got to err on that
Speaker 1: side of caution, and yet you release the thing. How
Speaker 1: do you not bear responsibility if something happens, let's say hypothetically,
Speaker 1: Let's say yet hypothetically. I was, all right, Ross, I
Speaker 1: want to start something hypothetically called the Big We'll call
Speaker 1: it the Big Boo Bonus. Okay, all right, the Big
Speaker 1: Boo Bounty. All right, I'm the Big Boo Bounty. Now.
Speaker 1: The Big Boo Bounty hypothetically is, if you go to
Speaker 1: an event and see Tom Tillis speaking, you boo him.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's the totality of it. And I don't
Speaker 1: have a sponsor attached to this, but I have some
Speaker 1: ideas and the prize will be a sausage biscuit. All right,
Speaker 1: the Big Boo Bounty. You think I couldn't get one
Speaker 1: of you yahoo's to go boo Tom Tillis, Senator slender Man,
Speaker 1: of course they could, and you do it for a
Speaker 1: sausage biscuit, admit it.
Speaker 2: Ross.
Speaker 1: Do you think some lunatic would go boot time? I
Speaker 1: shouldn't say lunatic. Maybe you want a boot Tom Tillis,
Speaker 1: and that's free speech, so you do whatever you want.
Speaker 1: But like you're telling me that you how many radio
Speaker 1: appearances have you done over the years where you got
Speaker 1: a prize package that frankly is just a bunch of
Speaker 1: cheap crap. And what the contesting that people will allow
Speaker 1: themselves to do for an eight dollar hat or a
Speaker 1: five dollars CD. It's amazing, man, because people like stuff.
Speaker 1: People like stuff. Getting stuff free stuff is amazing. In fact,
Speaker 1: some of you, some of you like it so much
Speaker 1: that secretly we call you a prize pig because you're
Speaker 1: always winning every contest and you'll come up and bum
Speaker 1: rush other people like So one hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 1: is no change. By the way, there is no big
Speaker 1: boo bounty. I'm not buying you sausage biscuits, but I could,
Speaker 1: and I think it would be successful. And that's again
Speaker 1: such a minor example. And we're talking about obviously speech
Speaker 1: versus violence. And I want to be very clear here,
Speaker 1: but if you don't care, or if you're desperate one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand dollars, whether you think the guy
Speaker 1: can pay it or not, because I saw that reactionally,
Speaker 1: well he couldn't afford it. Well, people hearing that they
Speaker 1: don't know what this guy's banking situation is. They don't
Speaker 1: know if he's got they don't know if he's got friends.
Speaker 3: No, it just goes back to, you know, the power
Speaker 3: of the media and what they can have people do right,
Speaker 3: And that's without having like one hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 3: dollars bounty out there. It reminds me of remember the
Speaker 3: old Doug Stanhope bit where he's taught talking about you know,
Speaker 3: once again he's talking about the power of the media,
Speaker 3: and he says, you know they have they have so
Speaker 3: much power. I have. I have a small percentage of
Speaker 3: that power. But he could go on stage and say, hey,
Speaker 3: go in Munashlatsky's and he's gonna have some crazy fan
Speaker 3: that's gonna go in Munashlatsky's because it's just the way
Speaker 3: it works out.
Speaker 1: How you're convinced we would we could get a sausage
Speaker 1: biscuit giveaway for one boot.
Speaker 3: One thousand percent. Yes, yeah, there's somebody out there that
Speaker 3: would do it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so you know, don't don't give me this garbage.
Speaker 1: But no, we got it out here and it's released
Speaker 1: and people are able, they're they're old enough to remember
Speaker 1: what happened there in Nashville and the the nearly year
Speaker 1: long track to go ahead and then read it, and
Speaker 1: then when you read it, you're like, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: this how wow? You read it and it reads like
Speaker 1: somebody who's dealing with some severe mental health issues. Uh,
Speaker 1: some of which may bolster people's opinion that they're you know,
Speaker 1: based on suicide rates and a variety of other things
Speaker 1: that the current politically correct course of treatment versus the
Speaker 1: old politically correct course of treatment, which very different, are
Speaker 1: very different. Because one was an identifiable psychological condition within
Speaker 1: the handbook, and now you're told the other ones not.
Speaker 1: It makes people think they may have been right the
Speaker 1: first time. I'm not down. People are negotiating. There is
Speaker 1: no sausage biscuits, so I'm not giving you two. If
Speaker 1: you want a sausage biscuit, go get one.
Speaker 3: I mean you could cut the first biscuit in half
Speaker 3: and you can make two. But it's not really the
Speaker 3: same thing.
Speaker 1: Oh but that's how the government would that is how
Speaker 1: they would get you.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well it's tactically it's they'd bring in an expert
Speaker 1: from Harvard or whatever.
Speaker 3: Right, Yeah, I mean, you know, the two assassination attempts
Speaker 3: have proven something we already know. There's a lot of
Speaker 3: crazy people out there. And these crazy people, these two alone,
Speaker 3: try to assassinate Donald Trump without one hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: thousand dollars and almost incentives.
Speaker 1: Right, that's what Scario.
Speaker 3: So now you're gonna have believe it or not. There's
Speaker 3: still some more people out there, not just those two
Speaker 3: who want him dead. And now now you're throwing out
Speaker 3: like a large sum of money on top of it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well you think there's more than two crazy people?
Speaker 3: Possibly? Yes?
Speaker 1: Oh wow, Okay, Ross has theories. Yeah. No, Ross's theory
Speaker 1: is right, and it's evidenced by do you remember the
Speaker 1: Rasmussen pole we had the other day where they asked
Speaker 1: should should the president have been killed?
Speaker 3: Yeah? And what was it? The thirty three percent of
Speaker 3: Democratic responders said that he should have died, that we'd
Speaker 3: be better affair.
Speaker 1: Seventeen seventeen said he should fourteen said they're still thinking
Speaker 1: about it.
Speaker 3: Which is still nuts.
Speaker 4: Well, it's an interesting premise you proffer. I will I'll
Speaker 4: consider it to get back to you, burh. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: it is nuts. You're telling me within that. Well, we'll
Speaker 4: forget the fourteen percent who can't make a decision. And
Speaker 4: let's say just the seventeen percent. You're telling me a
Speaker 4: seventeen percent of how many what was.
Speaker 1: It in the rastals? I think it was a thousand.
Speaker 1: I don't have it in front of me. So you're
Speaker 1: telling me out of those one hundred and seventy individuals,
Speaker 1: look at that. I can do math out of those
Speaker 1: one hundred and seventy individuals, and then you times that
Speaker 1: and apply it to the population and will even use
Speaker 1: your rounding air or your your you know, three or
Speaker 1: four percent declared margins. You're telling me within that one
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy applied to a population of you know,
Speaker 1: adults voting to adults, you're telling me one of those lunatics,
Speaker 1: isn't like yeah, man, not a chance. And the fact
Speaker 1: that it didn't cross your mind is why people why
Speaker 1: people wanted, you know, or a wonder I should say
Speaker 1: what exactly the three letter agencies are up to and
Speaker 1: the DOJ And remember this is Mary Garland's prosecution. At
Speaker 1: the end of the day, that's where the buck stops.
Speaker 1: And he went ahead and I'm sure I am positive
Speaker 1: is at the very least getting briefed on this case.
Speaker 1: If you're the ag one of the meetings, you're taking
Speaker 1: his updates on the attempted assassination of a former president
Speaker 1: or president for that matter. It's too high level. So yeah,
Speaker 1: people are going to have conspiracy theories. And I understand
Speaker 1: why because you make it so damn easy.
Speaker 5: Hey, yeah, let's nail down this biscuit. Is it from
Speaker 5: Biscoville or bojngles.
Speaker 1: I told you we haven't. We haven't. We haven't got
Speaker 1: a sponsor attached yet. But considering I named it the
Speaker 1: Big Boo Bounty, I feel like that should be a
Speaker 1: good indicator of who we might court.
Speaker 6: So okay, so if we add some egg, does he
Speaker 6: get a hits afterwards?
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, when I say sausage biscuit, it
Speaker 1: can be sausage, egg and cheese. You know, we're all, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: booh in a flying tomato. Yeah, but it's not real, sir.
Speaker 1: It was just my point, and yeah, yeah, or maybe
Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe it is real. Because one listener
Speaker 1: wrote in and said that he would boo but then
Speaker 1: give us sausage biscuits, So well, yeah, you're gonna lose
Speaker 1: the bad Yeah, all right, all right, appreciate you trying
Speaker 1: to clarify.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, if you want to give me, you want to
Speaker 1: give Ross and I biscuits, that's fine. You got to
Speaker 1: have round potatoes too. I don't know where you're gonna
Speaker 1: get it from, but we'll figure it out. Wait, hold on, Boston,
Speaker 1: Paul's up, Boston. We see Boston, Paul. No, no, no, Boston.
Speaker 1: Paul says he'll do it for a biscuit and an
Speaker 1: Irish coffee. That would be the big booze bounty. That's
Speaker 1: not what we're offering, sir. All right, let's go ahead
Speaker 1: and dive into the Mark Robinson stuff, shall we. So
Speaker 1: I don't know where everyone's head's at. I mean, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of possibilities here. And as I've pointed out,
Speaker 1: ninety nine percent of what they've thrown at Mark Robinson,
Speaker 1: if it's true, is incredibly embarrassing. Is I think we'll
Speaker 1: be troubling for some voters even if that's you know,
Speaker 1: even with the idea that people change, and you know
Speaker 1: that may be a deep enough knife for his political opponents.
Speaker 1: The problem you run into is this you have, this
Speaker 1: emanates from CNN, and CNN has proven itself not to
Speaker 1: be a fair arbiter of news, because remember, it's not
Speaker 1: always just what's in there, but it's what is chosen
Speaker 1: to be covered and not covered. And it's very clear
Speaker 1: that if you're a Republican politician, they're going to go
Speaker 1: full on. Josh Stein was on Madow last night and
Speaker 1: his I'm not going to play all of his dumb audio,
Speaker 1: but basically he was out there saying that every Republican
Speaker 1: in North Carolina endorsed Mark Robinson and also now they
Speaker 1: refuse to change, which isn't true. I believe the what
Speaker 1: is it the treasure the GOP treasurer candidate, has raised
Speaker 1: some concern and I think people's concern will be raised
Speaker 1: because you had a bunch of staff exodus from his
Speaker 1: campaign and one of the reasons that is reported and
Speaker 1: again this you know, anything that Ril and CNN puts out,
Speaker 1: I need to see another source. I'm not joking. If
Speaker 1: I see a story that is not your not a
Speaker 1: generic story, but one that is political and has ramifications
Speaker 1: with that, you can bet your butt I'm going to
Speaker 1: go look for another one, especially if there is a
Speaker 1: hotly contested number or quote or something like that they
Speaker 1: have relegated themselves to a that status when I'm putting
Speaker 1: my prep together, because I simply don't believe them. And
Speaker 1: it doesn't mean that ninety percent of what they put
Speaker 1: out isn't correct. It is, but when you get into
Speaker 1: the really, really tense stuff, I don't believe them enough
Speaker 1: to take their word for it. I think a lot
Speaker 1: of people are there, and that's their own fault, by
Speaker 1: the way, and I'm not some weird conspiracy person. I
Speaker 1: think that the vast majority of what I see the
Speaker 1: main networks put out, if I will, I have no
Speaker 1: problem quoting here, assigning where it came from, but quoting it.
Speaker 1: You know, NBC News reported this, and I know what
Speaker 1: you're saying, MSNBC is NBC and all that, but they're not.
Speaker 1: They are in some stuff. You know, yesterday I saw
Speaker 1: all of the news agencies ms NBC, NBCABC, CBS running
Speaker 1: big breaking news banners about how the crime rates down
Speaker 1: and linking to the FBI numbers. And if you remember,
Speaker 1: this was literally just a thing that was part of
Speaker 1: the Trump versus Harris back and forth here recently where
Speaker 1: Trump said, no, that's not true. And the reason he
Speaker 1: said it's not true is because there are other arbiters
Speaker 1: of crime statistic gathering that disagree with the FBI numbers,
Speaker 1: And the reason they do is because the FBI numbers
Speaker 1: don't include literally thousands of municipalities reporting. Now, that doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that those numbers are fully excluded, because people still
Speaker 1: have to go to court or victims are still going
Speaker 1: to access one of the services available for victims, even
Speaker 1: for victims of crimes that are not solved. And if
Speaker 1: you start to gather all those points of data and
Speaker 1: then you compare it in municipalities where you're lacking data,
Speaker 1: you can start to get a picture of what they're
Speaker 1: dealing with. So while you can take individual cities that
Speaker 1: are reporting, you can go ahead and try to compare
Speaker 1: a year over year, but to look at it from
Speaker 1: a statewide standpoint, a region wide standpoint, or a national standpoint,
Speaker 1: you're missing a lot of data points. And also, even
Speaker 1: if they are reporting, it's very easy not to charge
Speaker 1: people for stuff. Right, do you think that in the
Speaker 1: state of California from ten years ago to now they
Speaker 1: think retail theft is down? Some municipalities not reporting could
Speaker 1: give you that picture in some places, but obviously we
Speaker 1: know that's not the case, it's that you made a
Speaker 1: decision years ago that if it wasn't over one thousand dollars,
Speaker 1: it wasn't worth your time. And that's why people are
Speaker 1: in there with a damn calculator trying to figure this
Speaker 1: stuff out. So, yeah, yeah, you got you got yourself
Speaker 1: a breaking news story that was a political football where
Speaker 1: you're coming out like, oh, look at the stuff we
Speaker 1: just found and we're gonna take it, and you're not
Speaker 1: doing any critical thinking about well, is it is this
Speaker 1: apples to apples comparison, and if you look at it
Speaker 1: you realize that it's not. It doesn't mean that it's wrong.
Speaker 1: Once you've gathered all of it, it may very well
Speaker 1: be down. I think that some I think you'd have
Speaker 1: a hard time convincing me, especially as some did you
Speaker 1: see the video from Philadelphia Ross? Did you see that
Speaker 1: video I posted last night? And I just made a
Speaker 1: joke about how the new Joker movie looks good. It's
Speaker 1: on the it's on our Twitter timeline at Casey on
Speaker 1: the radio, and it's it looks like it looks like
Speaker 1: that the end scene from the movie, the the original
Speaker 1: Joker movie. It is absolutely insane. And remember these are
Speaker 1: the people that murdered Hitchbot, So you know, keep in
Speaker 1: mind that's that will that will always be one of
Speaker 1: my favorite callback stories ever. If you guys don't know
Speaker 1: what Hitchbot was. Hitchbot was this this uh pie in
Speaker 1: the sky rainbows in Unicorn moon, bad experiment to prove
Speaker 1: the goodness of people, which is fun. Look here's the thing.
Speaker 1: I don't think you set out to do that because
Speaker 1: you're a bad person. I think you're I think you're
Speaker 1: a very ignorant person, right, And I don't think it'll
Speaker 1: serve you well in all aspects of life. And I'm
Speaker 1: looking out for you when I tell you it ain't
Speaker 1: that way. But perhaps a valuable lesson was was figured out.
Speaker 1: They built this robot and it's a goofy looking robot.
Speaker 1: It looks like it looks like the robot kind of
Speaker 1: from like Futurama. I can't remember that robot's name, but
Speaker 1: like it's a it's clear it's the robots. And I
Speaker 1: made it look human, look like Bender, A little bit
Speaker 1: like Bender, didn't it.
Speaker 7: Yeah?
Speaker 3: I thought it looked like a poverty droid. It the
Speaker 3: worst poverty droid.
Speaker 1: Okay, what roster poverty Droid's fine. The fact that it
Speaker 1: had one purpose in its programming, in its life. It
Speaker 1: was relying. It started what it was New York to
Speaker 1: San Francisco. I can't remember what route it was gonna take,
Speaker 1: but it was gonna go across the country. And it
Speaker 1: literally could. It could. It had pre pre program responses.
Speaker 1: It wasn't an AHI thing. But when people would find it,
Speaker 1: it'd be like, Hi, I'm hitch spot. I'm here to
Speaker 1: prove the goodness of others. Where are you going? I'm
Speaker 1: trying to get to San Francisco or whatever and so
Speaker 1: and so. Then people would transport and it made it
Speaker 1: a little ways down on ninety five, and then somebody
Speaker 1: who was kind enough to haul it to Philadelphia left
Speaker 1: it on Kensington Avenue. If you've ever if you are
Speaker 1: remotely familiar with Kensington, you ever see the video where
Speaker 1: they go down the street and all the people on
Speaker 1: drugs are hunch They're like laying hunched over, yet somehow
Speaker 1: still standing. One of the videos you see a lot
Speaker 1: is Kensington Avenue. It's a crazy, dangerous, drug fueled, prostitution
Speaker 1: ridden place in Philadelphia. It's a really and I didn't
Speaker 1: even realize how bad it was, except I got a
Speaker 1: buddy who was raised in Philadelphia, and I brought it
Speaker 1: up one time to ask how bad it really was
Speaker 1: because it was in a story, and he just started laughing.
Speaker 1: He's like, dude, dude, it's literally it's it's literally the
Speaker 1: worst place, a most abandoned place. And by the way,
Speaker 1: that dude's a liberal my friend there and even he's like, oh, no,
Speaker 1: you know, kill it with fire, like it's it's so awful. Anyways,
Speaker 1: they left Hitchbot down there, and Hitchbot was immediately taken
Speaker 1: into an alley and destroyed, you know, with the goodness
Speaker 1: of people. I don't know if they were trying to
Speaker 1: find copper in there or what was going on, but
Speaker 1: Hitchbot will always be one of my favorite stories. So anyway,
Speaker 1: we got a little little sidetrack there, so let's let's
Speaker 1: go ahead and get back over to the Mark Robinson stuff.
Speaker 1: So one of the things that is being reported as
Speaker 1: to why staff members may have left, I think is
Speaker 1: a legitimate point if it's true, and we're gonna hear
Speaker 1: from Mark. I got some audio here for you, and
Speaker 1: that was that he would not agree to bringing in
Speaker 1: basically digital forensic people to figure out the you know
Speaker 1: all that CNN story. Now you can think he doesn't
Speaker 1: have an obligation to, but that would be you not
Speaker 1: paying attention to how impactful this is going to be
Speaker 1: to his campaign. Doesn't matter whether it's fair or not.
Speaker 1: That's that's what's out there. And I know a lot
Speaker 1: of people have already sent him emails this morning. Are
Speaker 1: you saying you but no, here's what I'm telling you.
Speaker 1: I am giving you what is happening here. But am
Speaker 1: I more likely to believe that there might be something
Speaker 1: up if the individual refuses to investigate? Yes? I think
Speaker 1: that was a very powerful story. So I think that
Speaker 1: the new folks around Mark probably said that to him
Speaker 1: because and he has said it on this show. Going
Speaker 1: back to the stuff with his wife, he's got lawyers,
Speaker 1: they have some receipts and they're going to get it
Speaker 1: out there. And to that, I would say, you need
Speaker 1: to get it out there. If you got receipts on
Speaker 1: your wife's stuff or on the on this digital stuff,
Speaker 1: you need to get it out there. And if staff
Speaker 1: members around you feel that you're not doing that and
Speaker 1: they quit, it's going to be far more injurious than
Speaker 1: just CNN writing a story. You can argue all day
Speaker 1: with me, but I'm not giving you the political take.
Speaker 1: I'm keeping you in real vill Okay. People see that,
Speaker 1: and I think that it could be convincing to them.
Speaker 1: So if it's not true, and you have receipts and
Speaker 1: you want to and I understand it can be very
Speaker 1: difficult on the digital stuff, you have to you have
Speaker 1: to go out and you need to start pushing back
Speaker 1: on this stuff and it and it's I get it.
Speaker 1: You don't want to be drugged down into this. Nobody does.
Speaker 1: But this is where we are now. And I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: as somebody who's been doing this for a long time,
Speaker 1: it's the only way you're going to start putting yourself
Speaker 1: back towards the w call them and if I don't know,
Speaker 1: if we haven't confirmed for his interview tomorrow, I will
Speaker 1: tell this to him. And I don't tell it to
Speaker 1: him to be CNN on him. I tell him because
Speaker 1: I get a lot of takes, a lot of emails,
Speaker 1: and I've seen a lot of elections over the years,
Speaker 1: as many of you have too, and if you take
Speaker 1: an honest assessment of it, watching those closest to an
Speaker 1: individual walk away from them is very powerful, whether it's
Speaker 1: family that refuses to support somebody who's accused of a crime,
Speaker 1: or in this case, a politician that is having all
Speaker 1: the mud thrown at them but hasn't yet successfully dodged
Speaker 1: any of it. So that's that's where people need to
Speaker 1: at this point be proactive, okay. And one of the ways,
Speaker 1: and this is I think a I think this is
Speaker 1: a good step. One of the ways that you can
Speaker 1: be proactive in addition to proving that the information's false
Speaker 1: is also what Mark talked about yesterday.
Speaker 8: And taking steps then two, we absolutely are, We absolutely are.
Speaker 9: We're in talks right now. Everything up to legal counsel
Speaker 9: to take CE and n to task for what they have.
Speaker 7: Done to us.
Speaker 9: We are going after them, Okay, we are going to
Speaker 9: go after him for what they've done. But we have
Speaker 9: five weeks left in this race, folks, And make no
Speaker 9: mistake about it, we are not gonna let see and
Speaker 9: in throw us off of our mission.
Speaker 1: Our mission is to.
Speaker 3: Win this way.
Speaker 9: And quite frankly, I am dismayed about the fact. As
Speaker 9: I said before, think about how many people out there
Speaker 9: right now, right in a place where we are right now,
Speaker 9: who are hooked on fentanyl, who are hooked on opioids,
Speaker 9: and how many will die tonight because of it. Think
Speaker 9: about what's going on on our border, think about what's
Speaker 9: going on on the world stage.
Speaker 1: And this is what you this is what you choose
Speaker 1: to focus on.
Speaker 9: You've got these news cameras, news reports, pans, pencils, your microphones.
Speaker 1: This is what you're focused on.
Speaker 9: You're not focused on the things that we talked about
Speaker 9: standing out there, about our economy. You're not focused on
Speaker 9: those things.
Speaker 7: I am.
Speaker 9: I'm going to remain focused on those things. And you
Speaker 9: better understand I am coming after full seeing, in full thrive,
Speaker 9: putting the people first. And in order to put the
Speaker 9: people first. In order to put the people first, we've
Speaker 9: got to concentrate on this campaign, and that what we're going.
Speaker 1: To do, all right in here. And here's what I
Speaker 1: would say to that. And I'm curious your thoughts eight
Speaker 1: eight eight nine three four seven eight seven four. Some
Speaker 1: of you already mad at me in my email. That's fine,
Speaker 1: because this isn't about me handicapping one way or another,
Speaker 1: whether it's true or not. It's explaining what's happening right
Speaker 1: now and what's happening right now is not good for
Speaker 1: Mark's campaign and if he hopes to accomplish those things
Speaker 1: that he feels passionate about, opioid deaths, which are a
Speaker 1: big problem in North Carolina. A lot of the drug
Speaker 1: related stuff that he's talked about is a big problem.
Speaker 1: Obviously when you watch what transpired during all of the
Speaker 1: COVID stuff, that's a big problem. I expect whoever the
Speaker 1: next governor is. I don't think Josh Stein will do it,
Speaker 1: but I think whoever the Republicans get in their next
Speaker 1: along with the legislature, they need to make that not
Speaker 1: a thing anymore. These are all things that are only
Speaker 1: achievable if you're in office and if you have the
Speaker 1: people around you who don't feel that you're confident enough
Speaker 1: or you're actually attempting to fight back as effectively as possible.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter whether they think it's true or not.
Speaker 1: It puts a perception out there and it's not a
Speaker 1: positive one for voters. So I'm just I'm giving you
Speaker 1: the straight dope, no pun intended over the other thing.
Speaker 1: That's how it is. If you think I'm wrong, please
Speaker 1: let's have a respectful conversation about this. But I'm not wrong.
Speaker 1: I am correct. And if you are going to sue
Speaker 1: CNN and you're going to be successful with it, then
Speaker 1: you need to be able to prove that what they
Speaker 1: reported was not true. And so either road requires you
Speaker 1: to have a digital forensic analysis, an attempt to do this,
Speaker 1: an attempt to gather that information and show that this
Speaker 1: was Do I think that somebody could do this? Yes,
Speaker 1: absolutely do I think somebody could fabricate something like that.
Speaker 1: They'd have to be really, really, really good, but I
Speaker 1: think they could. But also, I'm not a tech genius, okay,
Speaker 1: but I'm a very good observer of how human nature works.
Speaker 1: And the way that human nature works is if people
Speaker 1: are not seeing quote unquote receipts coming back, it starts
Speaker 1: to make them question things, and maybe they don't vote
Speaker 1: for the other guy, but they don't vote at all.
Speaker 1: We'll be back and a one hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 1: dollars bounty. And then that's just put out there into
Speaker 1: the public record by the same folks who argued that
Speaker 1: you couldn't put out the trans manifesto in Nashville because
Speaker 1: it might it could potentially bring harm to members of
Speaker 1: the LGBTQ community. And if you believe that, that's fine,
Speaker 1: but you can't look at this and think otherwise. No,
Speaker 1: it's pure politics. Man. All right, let's let's give me
Speaker 1: yelled at for a while. Donna, what's up?
Speaker 6: Good morning, Casey morning. So you guys are going to
Speaker 6: start the boom big beer biscuit bounty.
Speaker 1: No, that's not really what was said this morning.
Speaker 6: Hey, listen, I have to ask you. You haven't spoken
Speaker 6: about it yet, but I have a funny feeling you
Speaker 6: will eventually. Have you seen the kerfuffle over Trump paying
Speaker 6: for the groceries for two people?
Speaker 1: And just so we're clear, Ross, did I not literally
Speaker 1: say this to you two segments ago?
Speaker 5: No?
Speaker 7: You did yet, Yeah, we got Oh I missed it.
Speaker 7: I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, no, I had. I didn't say it on
Speaker 1: the air. I said it off far to Ross.
Speaker 7: So yes, I just know it's gonna blow up.
Speaker 6: It's gonna blow up, and it really.
Speaker 7: Funny, all right.
Speaker 1: So and that's why, and that's why Ross puts you
Speaker 1: out too, because we were going to talk about it.
Speaker 1: So basically what Donna is saying, so yesterday, uh Trump
Speaker 1: is in Pennsylvania and he's buying popcorn, a big old
Speaker 1: bag of popcorn. And when he goes to the checkout,
Speaker 1: there's a woman I guess it's two sisters or a
Speaker 1: sister and a mom or whatever, and they're standing there.
Speaker 1: They got nice matching T shirts and they're checking out, which,
Speaker 1: as you and I both know, is absolutely blood boiling
Speaker 1: right now, like your blood. But you go to that
Speaker 1: checkout thing and watch that number, It just it kills you.
Speaker 1: And and he pulls one hundred dollars out of his
Speaker 1: pocket and then it kind of like hands it to
Speaker 1: the woman over her shoulder and says, here you go,
Speaker 1: when I'm in when i'm in office, I'll do this
Speaker 1: from the light house, you know, applying that he'll help
Speaker 1: bring grocery prices down.
Speaker 3: That's it.
Speaker 1: That's what he did, and that's it. People got mad
Speaker 1: over it.
Speaker 6: So yeah, they're saying he's buying votes. But when Kamala
Speaker 6: Harris promises loan forgiveness, a student loan forgiveness, and he's
Speaker 6: going to give twenty five thousand dollars to people who
Speaker 6: want to buy a house, that's not bribery.
Speaker 1: No, that's not at all. Come on, Donna.
Speaker 6: Yeah, so actually he paid, he paid two people's groceries.
Speaker 6: So they gave out a couple hundred bucks and maybe
Speaker 6: get two votes out of it. But you know, twenty
Speaker 6: five grande, you know for a house. That's not bribery.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, not at all. I'm glad you understand.
Speaker 7: So all right, so take you.
Speaker 6: Know, be careful with your boon big beer biscuit bounty.
Speaker 7: You don't want to.
Speaker 6: Get in any trouble.
Speaker 1: Why aren't you up in Maine helping? By the way,
Speaker 1: Oh have you seen that story?
Speaker 6: I think I've sent it to you five times.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's some son's eating all the cats up in Maine.
Speaker 6: It is, Yeah, and they don't know what it is.
Speaker 1: They do know what it is. They're getting eaten by bobcats.
Speaker 6: And no, no, no, the Christian Wildlife came out and
Speaker 6: said that that's not possible. They don't eat that money.
Speaker 1: Well, you don't think it's possible to bobcats or a
Speaker 1: wolf will eat your cat? I got news for your life.
Speaker 1: In wolf and bobcat country, they'll eat your calves. The bobcats,
Speaker 1: not necessarily, but they leat your calves too. You think
Speaker 1: they won't eat a cat, Well, I don't know.
Speaker 6: I'm gonna have to look at the article and find
Speaker 6: out why they said that.
Speaker 1: No one of them one of the meanest creatures cornered
Speaker 1: that I've ever dealt with as a bobcat.
Speaker 6: Oh, I can believe that.
Speaker 1: I can believe that they're nasty, nasty little buggers when
Speaker 1: they're cornered, and understandably so I'm just like your house
Speaker 1: cat ain't winning that fight, that's all. I'm all right,
Speaker 1: We'll let you go figure out cat. Yeah bye. Also,
Speaker 1: you haven't accounted for that old guy who hates cats
Speaker 1: in your community when they come in his yard? Would
Speaker 1: is the thing man? All right? Uh? Vince, you're up.
Speaker 7: Hey, what's going on? I've been called there on a
Speaker 7: couple of years. I've just been listening. Uh, but thanks
Speaker 7: for taking a call. I want to talk about Mark Robinson.
Speaker 7: Not a Mark Robinson fan at all, But it's it's
Speaker 7: a couple of elements of this story that's this that's
Speaker 7: kind of hurting me. It is the King, it is
Speaker 7: the kink sham in part right, it's the other stuff
Speaker 7: he said that just the the kink samement in politics
Speaker 7: has gotten out of hand. And we know what goes
Speaker 7: on behind closed doors. We know this goes on and
Speaker 7: they're human just like us.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but we don't want to picture it, that's for Yeah.
Speaker 7: I'm not understandable. But but this, this is, this is
Speaker 7: how I can disseminate down to the rest of the society. Right,
Speaker 7: if it's come clean with it. We're a humans. We
Speaker 7: got kinks it'll it'll perminate down down the line. Well,
Speaker 7: so with this Mark Robinson thing, uh, with Trump and
Speaker 7: advance coming here after that thing came out, they knew
Speaker 7: about this, right, this is nothing. This is gop O
Speaker 7: GOP crime.
Speaker 1: This is yeah, I know, I don't know. I would
Speaker 1: agree with you that in a normal in a normal world,
Speaker 1: I would think that the people surrounding a presidential campaign
Speaker 1: would would know about all this stuff, or at least
Speaker 1: allegations of this stuff. But I don't know such Trump's operations.
Speaker 1: Different man, homebody.
Speaker 7: Well, this is the saying in twenty eighteen, someone spike
Speaker 7: shirts that that mini soldier right from New York that
Speaker 7: wasn't that wasn't a liberal or dim outfit. That had
Speaker 7: to be a GOP outfit because they let him. No, no,
Speaker 7: they let it was. If it was a dim outfit,
Speaker 7: they would have stopped it from being who governor.
Speaker 1: No no, no no no no no no no, who
Speaker 1: who cares for the lieutenant because they didn't think he
Speaker 1: was gonna win lieutenant governor. But now he's a threat,
Speaker 1: so I could go I could go both ways on this.
Speaker 1: You said you had tooths that's the other thing, Vince, Well,
Speaker 1: well the other.
Speaker 7: Thing was the first thing was because I didn't get
Speaker 7: to doin it. But yeah, if we need to stop that,
Speaker 7: they keep shaming from a from perspective that that is
Speaker 7: consensual and they're adults. We should not shame upon people.
Speaker 7: And and I think the Trump and his demeanor has
Speaker 7: broken down that third wall. So now we can go
Speaker 7: ahead and do this. Right, he's broken down so many norms,
Speaker 7: we can go ahead with his next norm and and
Speaker 7: break it down and say, hey, if if if Nancy
Speaker 7: Bilosi and her husband like to do their thing, let
Speaker 7: them do it. You know what I'm saying, don't don't
Speaker 7: shame before. I'm not saying that they'd been shame. I'm
Speaker 7: just saying somebody like.
Speaker 1: That, all right, Vince, Vince, what if I told you
Speaker 1: that one of the videos from Diddy's house they raided
Speaker 1: is Nancy Pelosi at a freak off.
Speaker 7: Hey, that's all that's okay. I mean, if it was
Speaker 7: and Nancy Belosi wanted to do it, that's fine. That's
Speaker 7: something like Steine and girl.
Speaker 1: By the way, that's not a thing that I know about.
Speaker 7: So you know, I'm just saying we bunched it all
Speaker 7: together from it so much instead of separating. When somebody the.
Speaker 10: Pedophil, pedophile, right, somebody to freak that's two different things.
Speaker 10: And we togetherause politicians want to be so suit and
Speaker 10: tied button up when they should just admit it and
Speaker 10: the rest of society. And I'm telling you, if people
Speaker 10: start admitting it, the stuff that trans and.
Speaker 7: Gay, l d p t Q people go through it,
Speaker 7: will it will start to diminish.
Speaker 1: That's a problem. Well no, no, no, But but the other
Speaker 1: side is this too. You can also simultaneously not care
Speaker 1: but I but not want to know what people are into.
Speaker 7: No, no, but that's that's the thing. Though we have
Speaker 7: the information in this in our society now is so prevalent.
Speaker 7: We know who so nails get clipped and and didn't
Speaker 7: freak off, right.
Speaker 1: So that's a different thing. But like I don't know
Speaker 1: what everyone around the studio is into. And I don't
Speaker 1: want to know they're not.
Speaker 7: But they're not running for office, so we're not. We
Speaker 7: can't put that gn back in.
Speaker 1: A bottle, right right, the girls. But people's predilections are
Speaker 1: not just utilized to cudgel them when they're running for office.
Speaker 1: Right when when.
Speaker 7: Madison coff When Madison Coffin one came out and said
Speaker 7: what he said about what happened to d C. You
Speaker 7: see how fast the GOP turned on them.
Speaker 1: Well, because I am, and it sounds like you do too.
Speaker 1: Uh you know, remember DC's home to the waitress sandwich events.
Speaker 7: But it was it's not the same and somebody being
Speaker 7: a deviant, uh pedophile and being.
Speaker 1: Agree, I agree if it's not kids and Ted Kennedy
Speaker 1: and what and I can't remember who that one was,
Speaker 1: want to uh, I'm gonna get myself very.
Speaker 7: Heart, very heart should have still been able to run
Speaker 7: the president yeh yeah, I mean, but it was consistuble though,
Speaker 7: staying the right.
Speaker 3: I hear you.
Speaker 1: So, but remember what you're also arguing is you're arguing
Speaker 1: no evaluation of character. And I think that's.
Speaker 7: We're already there. We're already there.
Speaker 1: Come on, man, No no no, no, no, no no, I'm saying
Speaker 1: as part of practical norms, meaning media has got to
Speaker 1: agree not to cover stuff like that, and I'm just
Speaker 1: saying that it doesn't currently exist, is all. I gotta go, Evince,
Speaker 1: I got to go. But I appreciate the call. Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I really don't. I don't care what you all want
Speaker 1: to do over the weekends. But for most of you,
Speaker 1: I don't want to hear about it, right, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't want to know. So we'll get more call
Speaker 1: only that Jamal's going to all right, hang on, Jamal,
Speaker 1: we'll get to your call here in just a moment.
Speaker 1: Ray stagic from the Weather Channel. Well you got to
Speaker 1: say this. At least you aren't the Jags, So there's that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was rough. Well how about the Commanders? Wow, surprising,
Speaker 2: it's crazy.
Speaker 1: Well why is that surprising?
Speaker 7: Oh?
Speaker 2: Well, I mean Brookie her back, right, not that it
Speaker 2: doesn't happen. And you'd think that the Bengals are one
Speaker 2: of the top teams maybe in the AFC, at least
Speaker 2: the beginning of the game.
Speaker 1: Almost as if it's almost as if if you're going
Speaker 1: to pay your quarterback an ungodly sum of money. I
Speaker 1: work out for you.
Speaker 2: I was thinking that exact same thing last night. Look
Speaker 2: at these you know, million, multi million, tens of million dollars.
Speaker 1: Rock Perdy's apartment. No, it's it's like I had an
Speaker 1: apartment bigger than that when I was it was called
Speaker 1: a dorm. Right, well, lives in the Bay Area, so
Speaker 1: there's that. Yeah, what's he making a million bucks this year?
Speaker 7: Yeah?
Speaker 1: Probably another mill look at his too, right doors.
Speaker 2: We should yeah, they should siphon it off with Trevor
Speaker 2: and Dak and all the other guys who I got
Speaker 2: to think about.
Speaker 1: I think I think what really curse the Jags is
Speaker 1: bringing in a former Patriots quarterback because probably probably U.
Speaker 2: Let's see, speaking of I don't know what they're going
Speaker 2: to do with high school football games. I mean, can
Speaker 2: they play tonight or tomorrow night? It doesn't look good
Speaker 2: later in.
Speaker 1: The you know, yeah, I played in the damn blizzard
Speaker 1: in high school.
Speaker 9: Yes, I played.
Speaker 1: Well, I couldn't see the other half of the field,
Speaker 1: and you were there and here you are both ways.
Speaker 2: Both ways in both directions.
Speaker 1: Right, it was. It was more inclined than that roof
Speaker 1: Secret Service wouldn't put agents oh gosh, oh yeah, yeah, dangerous.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and yeah. So the message being that of greater
Speaker 2: impacts the closer to the center of our storm, which
Speaker 2: has not yet become a tropical storm. It's a potential.
Speaker 2: Try don't want to even get into that ball Wax.
Speaker 2: I've had two discussions already, the three actually, so we
Speaker 2: don't have time for it. Do you have an area
Speaker 2: rain in thunderstorms coming through the triangle right now west
Speaker 2: to east? I was already pulled out of Burlington to
Speaker 2: the west of town, and the Triad is basically a
Speaker 2: little drier. But this heavier rainfall thunder lighting Franklin County,
Speaker 2: Wake County, and the Durham County going east and then
Speaker 2: more on the way scattered showers thunder showers today and tomorrow,
Speaker 2: not with our tropical system, but again it looks like
Speaker 2: further west, as we get into Thursday and Friday, we'll
Speaker 2: continue to see the rain increasing in intensity and coverage
Speaker 2: from what will be a weakening tropical storm, so Triad
Speaker 2: west into the Mountain's heaviest rainfall triangle. I still think
Speaker 2: some of the question is going to be how much
Speaker 2: next day or two casey, we still have got plenty
Speaker 2: of time to talk about it. But this morning. We
Speaker 2: do have some impactful rain coming through the triangle right now,
Speaker 2: going east.
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, well suck it up today.
Speaker 7: Yep.
Speaker 1: Maybe we'll get a blizzard and we can go play football,
Speaker 1: thank you, sir. Hop Yeah, look at that race stage
Speaker 1: hoping for the worst. All right, we'll come back. More
Speaker 1: calls next, Hang on Cacoday Radio program coming up. We
Speaker 1: have a Monkey's in India story. But hold on, hold
Speaker 1: on before you tune out, because I admit we've brought
Speaker 1: you some really awful ones. Because they are crazy. Remember
Speaker 1: they threw a baby off the top of a building
Speaker 1: and then also they killed all the puppies, all the
Speaker 1: puppies in the village because a dog had eaten a
Speaker 1: baby monkey. And they're very, very retaliatory. This is going
Speaker 1: to be the feel good, insane bands of roving monkeys
Speaker 1: in India stories. So we'll have that for you in
Speaker 1: just a few minutes, so we can, I don't know,
Speaker 1: put some happy thoughts in your head. Let me grab
Speaker 1: a call on the Robinson stuff. Let's go Jamal, what's
Speaker 1: going on?
Speaker 7: Hey, Kase, I want to say this real quick, and
Speaker 7: this has to be said. Donald Trump didn't do anything.
Speaker 7: Donald Trump came and found a body and showed it
Speaker 7: to everybody. It was a mutilated body. Called the press.
Speaker 7: Now when it comes to Mark Robinson, because I'm one
Speaker 7: of these people out here that I put out martinside
Speaker 7: for Mark Robinson out at four o'clock last night. I
Speaker 7: was up this morning four o'clock putting outside for Mark Robinson.
Speaker 7: You know what for people to say, oh, he just
Speaker 7: needs to suit the press, that is the biggest bunch
Speaker 7: of garbage for people who know it is impossible to
Speaker 7: sue the Prins. Look at Nicholas saying, man, they live
Speaker 7: on him. They said he was harassing the Native American.
Speaker 7: Look what happened to him people and some people on
Speaker 7: seeing then actually bragged that he only got three hundred
Speaker 7: thousand dollars and they weren't supposed to ruin his life.
Speaker 7: Look what they did for George Zimmerman. Through this day,
Speaker 7: people believe what Andrea Mitchell said that George Zimmerman said
Speaker 7: he was black and he getting and they edited the take.
Speaker 7: He didn't get anything. So from when I hear people,
Speaker 7: especially Republican on the Democrats saying, Democrats know the press
Speaker 7: has always been corrupted, been on their side because if
Speaker 7: there hadn't been Ted Kennedy would have been thrown out
Speaker 7: of the Senate a long time ago. Look what they
Speaker 7: did for President Trump when it comes to the.
Speaker 1: Listen on the lap job. Just because I want to
Speaker 1: ask you a couple of questions, because I understand your passion.
Speaker 1: I see your social media posts all this. And I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that he should Susie and m but I'm saying,
Speaker 1: if you're going to it's a it's a huge mountain
Speaker 1: to climb. That being said, when you see staff members
Speaker 1: leaving Mark Robinson, a half dozen or eight or whatever
Speaker 1: the number is now, and you see a quote from
Speaker 1: one of them saying he wouldn't go, and he he
Speaker 1: didn't seem as though he wanted to hire proper investigators
Speaker 1: to determine how this information, which he claims is false,
Speaker 1: came to be. Don't you do you believe that that
Speaker 1: is impactful on voters and is a negative to his vote?
Speaker 7: Column number one, I can only go back when they
Speaker 7: sat there and they choose President Trump was saying that
Speaker 7: the that the that the serviceman will suckers and loses,
Speaker 7: and that was a lot made up, and nobody ever
Speaker 7: apologized about that.
Speaker 1: Altama Jamal just because I only have about a minute,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry and I'm not in This isn't even you
Speaker 1: and I argument. I just I want to make sure
Speaker 1: that you understand my conference. This is this is different man.
Speaker 1: This is different because he's claiming that a digital crime
Speaker 1: or a digital falsehood was committed, even if he can't
Speaker 1: bring in experts to do it, to appear to be
Speaker 1: serious about getting those receipts goes a long way, and
Speaker 1: it feels like some of his staff members didn't think
Speaker 1: that was the case. That's what I'm asking you, know
Speaker 1: about a minute. Do you think that that is impactful?
Speaker 1: Whether it's true or not, it's the perception.
Speaker 7: Yes, that that is impactful. Because Republicans, the Spencer, the
Speaker 7: ones who really didn't want a Mark Robinson and really
Speaker 7: didn't want a Donald Trump. Of course they gonna bail
Speaker 7: onto the first reason why.
Speaker 1: Eight eight eight nine three four seven eight seven four
Speaker 1: of the phone numbers we get things rolling this morning.
Speaker 1: One of the most backcrap, crazy holes, rabbit holes you
Speaker 1: can find yourself going down is just reading monkey violence
Speaker 1: in India stories over the last few years. It's insane.
Speaker 1: You have whole villages where people left. You have monkeys
Speaker 1: throwing babies and puppies. You have of course, people abusing
Speaker 1: the monkeys. You have tourists that think they're nice only
Speaker 1: to get their face eaten, which you know, we had
Speaker 1: our own face eating primate story here. But no, this
Speaker 1: is like, it's crazy, but there's not too many happy
Speaker 1: stories until now I found And it's insane like all
Speaker 1: the rest, but at least it's happy. According to the
Speaker 1: Times of India, a troop of monkeys attacked a man.
Speaker 1: Well you think you're thinking, what's good about that? Happen
Speaker 1: to be a man who was attempting to sexually assault
Speaker 1: a six year old child. Yeah, that's right. According to
Speaker 1: the report, the man was seen on CCTV leading the child,
Speaker 1: who is six, down a lane in Bogpot near New
Speaker 1: Delhi over the weekend. The suspect then proceeded to pull
Speaker 1: her into an abandoned house and was undressing her and
Speaker 1: you know, going down that road. But as the girl
Speaker 1: was screaming or is this just the child? I guess
Speaker 1: it does say it's a girl. Yeah, it is a girl, okay.
Speaker 1: As the little girl started screaming, what happened next? A
Speaker 1: troop of local monkeys saw this, and again, so much
Speaker 1: of this stuff with monkeys interacting with people has to
Speaker 1: do with kids. Like the reason that one of these
Speaker 1: monkeys grabbed a human baby was because one of the
Speaker 1: monkeys had their babies injured or killed. I can't remember
Speaker 1: what triggered it by a human like, that's some that's
Speaker 1: some dark stuff, man. In this case, they hear this
Speaker 1: six year old screaming for help, so they come down
Speaker 1: and the entire pack of primates jumps on this dude
Speaker 1: all at once. Now they're not big enough to kill him,
Speaker 1: but he stopped what he was doing and ran the
Speaker 1: hell out of there. The child then recounted the story
Speaker 1: of the monkeys to her family, which she you know,
Speaker 1: she booked it from their home, and investigators started looking
Speaker 1: into it. They had some of the CCTV footage. Sadly
Speaker 1: there's not you can't see the monkeys attacking this guy.
Speaker 1: But they also now know who the guy is, so
Speaker 1: they are investigating. Although the suspect has not yet been caught.
Speaker 1: They haven't they haven't identified him officially, but they do
Speaker 1: have CCTV footage that clearly shows who he is, so
Speaker 1: we shall see. But yeah, see, I had to do
Speaker 1: it because usually these stores orries are horrendous, and now
Speaker 1: you've got little packs of crime fighting monkeys. I don't
Speaker 1: know how that squares with the other monkeys throwing puppies
Speaker 1: and stuff, but you know, maybe that's a good group
Speaker 1: of monkeys want to have around. I think people will
Speaker 1: probably be feeding them for a while. And I don't
Speaker 1: even have to get into the sexual assault stuff in India.
Speaker 1: It's just it's it's really really dark over there. But
Speaker 1: now that there's monkeys involved, we thought we'd throw it in,
Speaker 1: all right, eight eight eight nine three four seven eight
Speaker 1: seven four. So one of the ways that the Harris
Speaker 1: campaign has decided that they're going to run this race
Speaker 1: is that when there is tough questions or questions that
Speaker 1: require specifics, they're not letting Harris go out and do it.
Speaker 1: You send a surrogate, right, You send somebody who's polished
Speaker 1: on this. Is is A is A is A seasoned orator,
Speaker 1: has good recall of numbers and facts, and also has
Speaker 1: the ability to either schmooze who the interviewer is if
Speaker 1: you think it's going to be a contentious interview, or
Speaker 1: take full advantage of softball safe interviews and you go
Speaker 1: and you do all of these things, and you act
Speaker 1: as a surrogate. This is what they would call them,
Speaker 1: a surrogant. And if your candidate's not being made available,
Speaker 1: desperate news stations who got time to fill, especially the
Speaker 1: twenty four hours, they're going to go ahead and bring
Speaker 1: these cats on. And then you get somebody who gets
Speaker 1: to make an argument for a Harris thing, a position
Speaker 1: or a point or a controversy or whatever it is,
Speaker 1: without Harris ever having to adjust it because you or
Speaker 1: address it because you know how bad she's going to
Speaker 1: be at it. The problem is you couldn't even get
Speaker 1: that right yesterday. What are you doing? This might be
Speaker 1: the worst official campaign surrogate interview I've seen in a
Speaker 1: long time. But unfortunately, I think the woman slightly handicapped
Speaker 1: by the fact that she doesn't have specifics on this
Speaker 1: stuff right. There's no I know that there's some stuff
Speaker 1: on her website now, but for the most part, you
Speaker 1: ask a Kamala Harris supporter specifically on a particular issue
Speaker 1: what their candidate is going to do, they couldn't answer
Speaker 1: because I couldn't answer, And I look for the stuff
Speaker 1: because I want to know. Not in any specifics. You
Speaker 1: can get into generic stuff. And don't get me wrong,
Speaker 1: She's not the first politician to be cagey or generic
Speaker 1: about some things. But generally they also have some very
Speaker 1: specific things, even if it's recycled standard boilerplate party stuff
Speaker 1: and you just don't have this here. So imagine my
Speaker 1: surprise when I see this woman, this surrogate for a
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris show up on Fox News yesterday and the
Speaker 1: following ninety seconds takes place. Are you sitting down? You
Speaker 1: should be sitting down Harris's plan?
Speaker 3: Well waiting?
Speaker 11: Okay, there's a lot of aspect.
Speaker 1: All right, hang on, hang on, good, get two different people,
Speaker 1: just email Ross. Do we have an eas weather thing
Speaker 1: going off? Okay, all right, I'm gonna stall because I
Speaker 1: have to set up this audio where people goun be
Speaker 1: walking in and then I'm gonna know what the hell
Speaker 1: I'm talking about. Let me know when it gets done,
Speaker 1: feeding and then it's done. Has it been done for
Speaker 1: about eighteen seconds? Okay? All right, So Kamala Harris's surrogate
Speaker 1: goes on Fox News yesterday and they're gonna get into
Speaker 1: grocery prices. All right, fair enough. You know Trump was
Speaker 1: handing one hundred dollars, and he made a point to
Speaker 1: touch on it yesterday. So let's hear what the person
Speaker 1: whose only job is to sound composed and intelligent on
Speaker 1: an issue so that their their candidate doesn't have to
Speaker 1: come out. Let's hear how that went. What is Harris's plan?
Speaker 3: We're waiting.
Speaker 11: Okay, there's a lot of aspects to it in regards
Speaker 11: to looking at online. So let's talk about lowering the
Speaker 11: grocery costs, because that's something.
Speaker 1: That's brought up. The viewers can look.
Speaker 11: At this online. She talks about certain things in regards
Speaker 11: to advancing the first federal ban on price gouging on
Speaker 11: food and groceries, to set clear rules to the road,
Speaker 11: to make it clear that big corporations can't unfairly exploit
Speaker 11: consumers as well.
Speaker 1: All right, I'm gonna pause. Uh So, if that's your plan,
Speaker 1: we've heard that. What does that look like? Is the
Speaker 1: follow up question that nobody has answers to? Who decides?
Speaker 7: What?
Speaker 1: Uh the ross? What's your favorite serial? You probably don't
Speaker 1: eat cereal? What am I saying? Are you fruit loops? Okay?
Speaker 1: Who's deciding who makes the price? Who gets to set
Speaker 1: the price on fruit? Loops. Is it General Mills or
Speaker 1: Pride Kelloggs, Is it Kellogg's or is it a committee
Speaker 1: appointed by the press? And have we decided what that does? Right?
Speaker 1: Because for every action there's a reaction, right, and so
Speaker 1: sometimes a lot of times politicians do stuff and then
Speaker 1: it has this horrible, horrible outcome and you just made
Speaker 1: it worse. It's kind of human nature, man, So what
Speaker 1: does it specifically? What does that look like? Is the question?
Speaker 1: Not just does she have a plan? But I'm sorry, continue,
Speaker 1: maybe we're going to get into specifics here. Sure is
Speaker 1: that happening?
Speaker 3: It's not at this moment.
Speaker 11: No, this is her plan that's laid out for the
Speaker 11: first hundred years.
Speaker 1: This idiot thought when she said is this happening? Meaning
Speaker 1: is price gouging happening? She thought, is Kamala Harris's plan
Speaker 1: in emotion already?
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 10: Or yes?
Speaker 7: Right?
Speaker 1: Because if she doesn't do anything, then and but you know,
Speaker 1: in wins and then just sticks with whatever Biden's doing,
Speaker 1: which is not working, which, by the way, I don't
Speaker 1: want I don't want to creep you out, but it
Speaker 1: might get a lot worse here very quickly, I'll explain why. Then, yeah,
Speaker 1: I guess her plan already is in effect. But no,
Speaker 1: the question was, is this is the price gouging happening?
Speaker 3: Like, is it.
Speaker 1: Evil board members sitting there and artificially inflating prices or
Speaker 1: is it prices that reflect, you know, attainable margins based
Speaker 1: on the cost of raw goods necessary to produce this stuff.
Speaker 1: There's a legitimate conversation, that's what That's what the question is.
Speaker 1: So I'm sorry, go right ahead.
Speaker 11: When she becomes president of the United States and marriaging,
Speaker 11: is that currently happening in regards to I don't know
Speaker 11: exactly if that's currently happening or not, because I'm not
Speaker 11: privity to that type of information. But there are people
Speaker 11: are costing costing a lot of money in regards to
Speaker 11: to groceries. Okay, and not potentially is time time articulating
Speaker 11: or plant But.
Speaker 6: I'm not, I'm not.
Speaker 1: That's not True's.
Speaker 11: I'm constantly being interrupted by you, which, as a woman,
Speaker 11: I think is disrespectful.
Speaker 4: I'm gonnah, she's a woman too, she would That's like
Speaker 4: Ross the Ross telling me I'm toxic masculinity for interrupted.
Speaker 1: Shut up.
Speaker 3: Well, first off, I'm upset you didn't let me answer
Speaker 3: the cereal question. Oh, you passed the question and then
Speaker 3: you moved on like but then.
Speaker 1: I remembered what you eat. It's meat.
Speaker 3: I don't favorite cereal is a big bowl of twenty
Speaker 3: hard boiled eggs.
Speaker 1: Do you see why I didn't let you answer?
Speaker 3: Now I do?
Speaker 1: Or is that just is that just the guy and
Speaker 1: me being a jerk? I don't know, so you want
Speaker 1: let me answered? And I'm a woman. I can't believe
Speaker 1: you're doing that.
Speaker 3: But that's but she did let her answer. That's the
Speaker 3: entire what are you talking about?
Speaker 9: Me?
Speaker 7: Oh?
Speaker 1: If somebody's man, I keep interrupting the audio, I don't care,
Speaker 1: you know what. That's the man in me? All right,
Speaker 1: last thirteen seconds of this dumpster fire.
Speaker 11: Every time I try and speak you you okay, final thought?
Speaker 6: Thank you so much for having me.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, I was giving you a time there all right.
Speaker 1: By the way, that was the uh, the way she
Speaker 1: said it, that was I'm sorry, ladies, I don't put
Speaker 1: this on you. That is every guy knows the tone
Speaker 1: of that woman's voice when she just said thank you.
Speaker 1: She doesn't mean thank you. Am I wrong here? She
Speaker 1: does not mean thank you. She means you're in trouble
Speaker 1: and you better figure out what you've done. But it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter because she's an idiot. What do you mean
Speaker 1: you're not privy to whether grocery prices or gouge? What
Speaker 1: do you mean you're not privy? Ross? Are you privy
Speaker 1: to increase grocery prices? Are you on the are you
Speaker 1: in the inner loop?
Speaker 3: I am aware that grocery prices are higher than they
Speaker 3: used to be. Yes, Wow, you've pointed this out of
Speaker 3: security clearance. I've pointed this out numbrous times in the show, right,
Speaker 3: Like that should be like Cheetos are eight dollars a bag,
Speaker 3: and cheetos are ninety nine air and then the cheese
Speaker 3: dust and that's like eight bucks.
Speaker 1: I mean delicious cheese dust, but yeah, mostly air. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so look at that. Ross's on the inside. He's got
Speaker 1: the inside track.
Speaker 3: But the whole, the whole way that went down is
Speaker 3: strange because she's like, hey, what is the policy And
Speaker 3: she's like, the policy is Kamala will make sure that
Speaker 3: price gouging isn't a thing to bring down groceries And
Speaker 3: then she says, well is that happening now? She goes,
Speaker 3: I don't know, well, if it isn't happening, then why
Speaker 3: are you gonna do it?
Speaker 1: But but and again, it's if some woman, some random
Speaker 1: person in the grocery store you asked that and they're like,
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's happening. I know grocery price
Speaker 1: for more, that would be a logical play. You're the
Speaker 1: campaign surrogate for the people who say it's happening. You
Speaker 1: are the spokesperson for Kamala Harrit. You are Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: for all practical purposes here.
Speaker 3: Right, And I would assume if you're if you're saying
Speaker 3: that that's what's bringing grocery prices up, then it should
Speaker 3: be happening, right Otherwise, why would your policy be against
Speaker 3: be for stopping it?
Speaker 1: And it could. It should be easy to find a
Speaker 1: angle manufacturer who is gouging well. Gouging is a thing
Speaker 1: that can happen, absolutely, And if you take all of
Speaker 1: the food that's sold here in the United States, is
Speaker 1: there a company out there who is who is quote
Speaker 1: gouging well, it depends what your definition of gouging is.
Speaker 1: Are they Now, if you want to get into legal things,
Speaker 1: you can't do colluding. That's a big one because the
Speaker 1: allegation that tends to go along with gouging is all
Speaker 1: the cereal manufacturers got together in a smoke filled room
Speaker 1: somewhere and went, Haha, peasants, let's all add a dollar
Speaker 1: to the price of our cereal. That would be currently
Speaker 1: illegal in the United States. That would be that would
Speaker 1: be collusion. In fact, if you just took our training, Rosta,
Speaker 1: didn't you just take our training? I believe they address
Speaker 1: it in our iHeart training about not colluding with our competition.
Speaker 1: So like, I'm aware of that, you're aware of that.
Speaker 1: But that's not what they're saying here. They're using a
Speaker 1: non fixable thing to say price gouging. Well, how do
Speaker 1: you fix that? Well, if your cost of your product
Speaker 1: goes up more than ten percent in one year, well
Speaker 1: what happens If the main ingredient of our product is unattainable,
Speaker 1: then we have to pay four times the cost for it,
Speaker 1: and it's ninety you know, ninety percent of the manufacturing cost.
Speaker 1: Could that person raise their price more than ten percent,
Speaker 1: they'd have to to keep it viable. Now, the whole
Speaker 1: thing is just And then when she gets her cornered
Speaker 1: and she wasn't even attempting to corner her. That's the
Speaker 1: even crazier part. She wasn't even attempting to corner her.
Speaker 1: But once they go ahead and get her quote unquote
Speaker 1: cornered on it, she as a reflex pulls out that
Speaker 1: I'm a woman card and you're attacking me. It's one
Speaker 1: of the craziest thing, even though she's talking to a woman.
Speaker 1: What the heck are we talking about here? Anyway? Look,
Speaker 1: sometimes it's just a case like if you are I
Speaker 1: don't know who the US distributor is. There's a rum,
Speaker 1: not the cheap Caribbean cruise rum that you drink. I'm
Speaker 1: talking a good, high end rum that I actually like.
Speaker 1: It's called Santa Teresa. I can't get it anymore. I can,
Speaker 1: but it's hard to find, and it's getting harder because
Speaker 1: it's made in Venezuela.
Speaker 3: And that's the whole thing.
Speaker 1: Obviously. The reason I'm pointing this out is the price
Speaker 1: ABC in North Carolina's a little different. But if you
Speaker 1: go to buy that in a state where it's free market,
Speaker 1: I was looking online, it's crazy expensive now, so I
Speaker 1: don't have any and I probably won't for a while.
Speaker 1: But the point is, though there's reasons why people greatly
Speaker 1: increase those prices because free market economy, the supply is
Speaker 1: obviously it's really hard to get right now because Venezuela
Speaker 1: is Venezuela, and these are these are market conditions that exist,
Speaker 1: and her plan doesn't account for this, but it should
Speaker 1: account for what's about to happen. And I'll tell you
Speaker 1: about that next. Hang on. They just ordered through the
Speaker 1: ABC Star. No, no, no, no, it's this for those of
Speaker 1: you want to know, because and I appreciate it. By
Speaker 1: the way, if you put coffee into liquor, I don't
Speaker 1: want any of it. So they do have that version.
Speaker 1: But no, the Santa Teresa Solera is is it's Santa
Speaker 1: Teresa Solera seventeen ninety six rum or whatever it's called.
Speaker 1: So I didn't. But again, maybe you shouldn't drink it
Speaker 1: because Venezuela. So I don't. I don't know. I'll leave
Speaker 1: that up to you, but I appreciate the effort. And
Speaker 1: then other lunatics are sending pictures of hard boiled eggs
Speaker 1: floating in cereal. That's not what Ross meant. Ross meant
Speaker 1: there's no milk, there's no cereal. It's just a bowl
Speaker 1: of hard boiled eggs, just so we're clear.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the photo that DIBs shared on social media, it
Speaker 3: seemed like it lacked eighteen other eggs.
Speaker 1: I did notice that, but maybe it's after they've already
Speaker 1: eat the good point right feast there. Yeahs just Ross
Speaker 1: eats hard boiled eggs, a lot of them. In fact,
Speaker 1: I've said this to him off the eye. I feel
Speaker 1: bad for his wife.
Speaker 3: I would say it's probably more like six a day.
Speaker 1: I feel bad for your for your whole family just
Speaker 1: around you just eating eggs. But I you know what,
Speaker 1: when I go to like you ever go to a
Speaker 1: stay at a hotel like where they have a quote
Speaker 1: unquote breakfast buffet, but it's basically like two of those
Speaker 1: waffle machines and some cereal little cereal boxes yogurt. That's
Speaker 1: basically it. Maybe they got some hot food, maybe they don't.
Speaker 1: My fallback though, is they always have a bin full
Speaker 1: of hard boiled eggs. And I'm not gonna lie if
Speaker 1: given the opportunity, I'll eat six of those bastards in
Speaker 1: the morning they're instead of eating any of that other stuff.
Speaker 3: It's a perfect food. Absolutely love it.
Speaker 1: It's great. I put hot sauce on it. I don't
Speaker 1: know if you juice it up with that little salt,
Speaker 1: little pepper, little hot sauce for rock and rolling, and
Speaker 1: I'll I'll do it in front of the other hotel goers.
Speaker 1: Right where was I at? I was staying at? Was
Speaker 1: I staying at a Marriott or something I can't remember
Speaker 1: or whatever. I think I was staying at a Marriot
Speaker 1: here six months ago or something I remember, which was
Speaker 1: the Oh it was the Marriot it was, No, it
Speaker 1: wasn't the Marriott in Greensborough was. Well, anyway, it doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: And they had one of those breakfast things, and so
Speaker 1: I go down there and I'm looking at all the
Speaker 1: stuff and I'm just like, I just want those eggs.
Speaker 1: So I put like six in a bowl. And the
Speaker 1: other people are looking at you because in their mind
Speaker 1: maybe they think that's all the eggs when you're just
Speaker 1: being greedy while I'm watching their kids load twenty seven
Speaker 1: little pancake things onto a plate whatever, and I'll just
Speaker 1: sit there douse it with the hot sauce in the bowl.
Speaker 1: So in a way, I'm kind of eating it like
Speaker 1: a cereal. But yeah, I know it's a great food.
Speaker 1: I just don't have that time to make all the eggs.
Speaker 3: Now they're probably looking at you thinking you're gonna die
Speaker 3: because you're eating six eggs. And that's because they're weak
Speaker 3: and stupid.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is we're just rouss and I
Speaker 1: were just having this big old discussion too about how
Speaker 1: much butcher our families and many of your families are
Speaker 1: than eurofolks. But that'll be a topic when I can
Speaker 1: attach it to a story and we'll have fun with it.
Speaker 1: So I mentioned, I mentioned.
Speaker 5: I.
Speaker 1: Okay, now getting into I'm not going to get into
Speaker 1: rum anything that says coffee finish or coffee in it,
Speaker 1: I don't. And if you like that, good for you.
Speaker 1: I got that's for you. Have fun with that. But
Speaker 1: we got totally sidetracked by this, all right, So why
Speaker 1: am I saying that things could get a lot more expensive?
Speaker 1: And here's the interesting political question. Does this hurt or help?
Speaker 1: This position by the Harris campaign even though the surrogate
Speaker 1: obviously didn't know what the help. The only thing that
Speaker 1: surrogate knew correctly to represent Kamala Harris was to accuse
Speaker 1: people of interrupting her because she's a woman. She's got
Speaker 1: that down, Pat Man, That's the only thing. Apparently the
Speaker 1: story get paid attention to. But a looming DOC workers
Speaker 1: strike could throw the economy and the presidential election into chaos.
Speaker 1: And we don't have to speculate what something like this
Speaker 1: looks like. We need only remember COVID. We need only
Speaker 1: remember COVID. And that wasn't a complete halt. It was
Speaker 1: damn near a complete halt. And you saw the chaos.
Speaker 1: Do you remember. Do you remember the first time during
Speaker 1: COVID you walked into grocery stores and they had pictures
Speaker 1: of products rather than products. How weird that was? And
Speaker 1: I don't mean like what they do in a CBS
Speaker 1: and lock it all down because you guys are a
Speaker 1: bunch of criminals. Not you, but you know others who
Speaker 1: would go in. And now you have to stand there
Speaker 1: for twenty minutes inside of Walmart trying to get razor blades,
Speaker 1: which is the thing I did at the Walmart just
Speaker 1: up here by the station off New Hope Church.
Speaker 3: The craziest thing during COVID was I don't know if
Speaker 3: you saw this, but I saw this the store I
Speaker 3: was at where the shelf was empty, but they had
Speaker 3: like a tarp in front of where the items would go.
Speaker 1: With pictures with the pictures of that. So yeah, that's
Speaker 1: when you're making your buggy or your cart and you're
Speaker 1: walking down the aisle and you look down the aisle.
Speaker 3: It would look like it was stocked. But then when
Speaker 3: you get up to you'd be like, oh, it's like
Speaker 3: a mirage, just a photo.
Speaker 1: But you had a baby with you when you were shot.
Speaker 1: What that's a buggy? You put babies and buggies, right?
Speaker 1: Is that what you meant? A baby buggy? I'm just
Speaker 1: starting fights for no reason now anyway, Yeah, No, it
Speaker 1: was creepy as all hell because from you right from
Speaker 1: a distance, you look down and you're like, oh, the
Speaker 1: soup's down there. The soup is not down there, But then.
Speaker 3: There was nothing behind it, like they was completely empty.
Speaker 7: It was.
Speaker 1: Now, So my question is if you and then the
Speaker 1: stuff you could get, is you remember what people were
Speaker 1: paying for stuff? My question is one, and this is one.
Speaker 1: Does that help Kamala right? Because if people are going
Speaker 1: out and either it's inaccessible or it is more expensive
Speaker 1: because supply and demand, does that like make her point
Speaker 1: if you're stupid? Do you know what I'm saying? You
Speaker 1: have to be stupid to allow it to make your
Speaker 1: point because you're not availing yourself of other information out there.
Speaker 1: Or we'll go with willfully ignorant to stupid. But like
Speaker 1: I feel like she can spit because people are going
Speaker 1: all this would be terrible for her. But you have
Speaker 1: to remember, nobody in the media is allowing the connection
Speaker 1: to be made that she's still the vice president and
Speaker 1: for all practical purposes, might even be the president. And
Speaker 1: you know, one of the most scandalous things, and I've
Speaker 1: seen a couple of people write stuff about this is
Speaker 1: the natural order of things is so broken down that
Speaker 1: if she wasn't running for president, there is zero reason
Speaker 1: why she shouldn't be the president right now. If we
Speaker 1: don't have a twenty fifth Amendment for this, then what
Speaker 1: are we even doing? Why even have it? Get rid
Speaker 1: of the damn thing. And remember before you're saying, well
Speaker 1: she can't, you know that you're correct, she can't. But
Speaker 1: the way that the twenty fifth Amendment is written is
Speaker 1: to task members of the cabinet and the vice president
Speaker 1: should they feel this way, and enough of them feel
Speaker 1: this way to do this thing that we look, we
Speaker 1: hope we never have to do, but it exists. And
Speaker 1: by the Democrat Party has now decided that this constitutional
Speaker 1: amendment is which they were a huge fan of not
Speaker 1: that long ago, is not a thing, and as a result,
Speaker 1: the country essentially lacks leadership, or at least identifiable leadership.
Speaker 1: So like, the whole thing is messed up. But I
Speaker 1: could see how they could spin this into a pro
Speaker 1: thing for her. And here's the scary part. If if
Speaker 1: people start to feel that way because they're desperate and
Speaker 1: believe it would help at the very least, then you
Speaker 1: have I guess the White House or whomever come out
Speaker 1: and they start price fixing stuff. They do emergency orders
Speaker 1: like Roy Cooper and the rest did that, you know,
Speaker 1: basically kicked in gouging laws and different things that do
Speaker 1: exist but are only supposed to exist in times of emergencies.
Speaker 1: And remember it was these same powers that they used
Speaker 1: to literally control what you could buy. Oh, that mom
Speaker 1: and pop store, can't go in there? You want to
Speaker 1: go in the Walmart that sells the same thing, sure,
Speaker 1: but you can't go in this aisle. Why that's where
Speaker 1: the seeds are. I'm sorry you can't have seeds, right,
Speaker 1: but wouldn't if I had seeds? Make it less likely
Speaker 1: that have to come to the grocery store. Don't you
Speaker 1: use logic, ma'am, which is literally what they told that
Speaker 1: woman in Michigan who had viral post out there. So
Speaker 1: I don't know, but if that thing comes to pass,
Speaker 1: you're talking eighty five thousand dock workers all across the
Speaker 1: nation threading to go on strike here in a week
Speaker 1: one week October first, that's the deadline. The negotiations haven't
Speaker 1: been happening since June. They broke down.
Speaker 4: Then.
Speaker 1: Now here's the thing with the dock workers. The dock
Speaker 1: workers are uniformally wanting to stop any advancement in automation.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, not gonna fly. Automation is an unfortunate part
Speaker 1: of every industry, you know what, radio. I could go
Speaker 1: on for days, but the fact remains that the current
Speaker 1: ports are not even getting to the I'm sorry, Ross,
Speaker 1: did the boss just cancel our meeting after the show?
Speaker 3: I was just about to text him. Nothing makes me
Speaker 3: happier and excites me more if they want to get
Speaker 3: a notification the Tuesday post show meeting is canceled. I
Speaker 3: was just I was just filled. I don't know if
Speaker 3: you saw my face over here. I'm going to get
Speaker 3: some age, I was filled with joy. Yes, I was
Speaker 3: just about text marketing, like meeting canceled.
Speaker 1: Although I do have to talk to him. I gotta
Speaker 1: te Ross. Is Ross taking some time off and I
Speaker 1: think I'm gonna mirrors time off coming up here in
Speaker 1: a week. I'm sorry, and I know I know I
Speaker 1: took some personal time last week, but it's it's purely
Speaker 1: a math thing because we want to be dug in
Speaker 1: for the rest of the stuff and we got vacation
Speaker 1: days user lose. So but we'll give you more details
Speaker 1: on that. So I do have to talk to him
Speaker 1: about that. But yeah, nothing makes Ross giddier than getting
Speaker 1: an outlook notification canceling meetings.
Speaker 3: How about stag?
Speaker 1: How do you feel about that when one of your
Speaker 1: bosses now that we don't like I want to be
Speaker 1: very clear, right, it's just like okay, it's like you're
Speaker 1: it's like a teacher forgot to assign homework, right right, yes?
Speaker 2: Yeah, or they canceled class. You know, you wake up
Speaker 2: that just happened.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there's one eighth of one inches of snow.
Speaker 3: As an intro As an introvert, nothing makes me more
Speaker 3: excited when people cancel plans, you.
Speaker 7: Know, what I mean.
Speaker 1: I'm like, yes, saying, oh, don't happen to anything kinks earlier.
Speaker 1: It might be a kink. I don't want to know.
Speaker 1: So he just he's really excited.
Speaker 2: Let me, Well, back in the day when we had meetings,
Speaker 2: it was nice to have them. Ken Now we don't anymore.
Speaker 1: Well, and they're virtual. It's like, you know, yeah, Ross
Speaker 1: and I can literally everyone in the building can be
Speaker 1: in the building and like you still don't have a
Speaker 1: face to face half the time. Exactly leave my office.
Speaker 1: So here's the deal. I'm trying to do a show here.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to explain why food prices might spike because
Speaker 1: of an eighty five thousand long shortman union ports strike
Speaker 1: here in a week. Uh so, like that's going to
Speaker 1: be bad. And the whole time did damn weather alerts
Speaker 1: going over the top. But he's not gonna keep starting
Speaker 1: stop it, so you need to stop that.
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, I'm sorry, And it's from the rain we had,
Speaker 2: so stop it. Yeah, we had the rain earlier. So
Speaker 2: what happened is that weather service going ahead and slapped
Speaker 2: the flash flood warning on southwestern Durham County. So we've
Speaker 2: seen a couple of inches of rain here, so heads up,
Speaker 2: there could be water ponding on roadways, Chapel Hill, Parkwood,
Speaker 2: the Research Triangle around you know, River State Park, Jordan Lake,
Speaker 2: and our rain luckily is coming to an end out
Speaker 2: near Cavender and Lake Ellen and Chapel Hill and rolling
Speaker 2: east though we may see additional flash flood warnings where
Speaker 2: we've seen this heavier rain through Nash and even Wake
Speaker 2: County around wake Forest too, so pretty rough from about
Speaker 2: this warning and Durham County east with the heavier rain
Speaker 2: back toward the west, looks pretty decent, but more scattered
Speaker 2: showers thutter showers through tomorrow. If we do get impacts
Speaker 2: from Helene, well, when it becomes a lean it'll be
Speaker 2: Thursday Friday in that timeframe with heavier rainfall, maybe some
Speaker 2: stronger winds, especially west of the triangle, and potentially even
Speaker 2: some severe weather. A lot of sort out, lots sort
Speaker 2: out yet about our tropical system. But let's deal with
Speaker 2: this rain first here this morning, but over the next
Speaker 2: couple of hours, your alert should start going off, meaning
Speaker 2: not off meeting on, but should end.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, all right, we like that.
Speaker 2: Sorry, I'll appreciated.
Speaker 8: And Jeff Bellinger next hand, Well, good morning, Casey. Wall
Speaker 8: Street started the week with an upsession. Futures are modestly
Speaker 8: higher right now. Dow futures are up fifty three. Federal
Speaker 8: Reserve officials who made public appearances yesterday indicated we could
Speaker 8: see more interest rate cuts by the end of the year.
Speaker 8: Central bankers all acknowledging that high rates are a drag
Speaker 8: on the economy. Red Finn out with a report this morning,
Speaker 8: it's able to say for the first time since twenty
Speaker 8: twenty that buying a home has become more affordable. The
Speaker 8: online brokerage says home buyers need an annual income of
Speaker 8: more than one hundred and fifteen thousand dollars to afford
Speaker 8: a median priced home that costs just over four hundred
Speaker 8: thirty three thousand dollars. The income needed to afford a
Speaker 8: home down nearly one and a half percent from a
Speaker 8: year ago. That's because mortgage interest rates posted their first
Speaker 8: annual decline in three years, and Casey, the federal government
Speaker 8: reportedly set to come down hard on visa sources tell
Speaker 8: Bloomberg the Justice Department plans to accuse the credit card
Speaker 8: giant of illegally monopolizing the debit card market. No comment
Speaker 8: from Visa or the Justice Department so far.
Speaker 1: Casey, I think both my debit cards are Visa cards,
Speaker 1: so I don't know. I just went with what my
Speaker 1: bank had. So what are you gonna do? All right,
Speaker 1: thank you, sir, appreciate it, right, have a good day,
Speaker 1: take care. Yeah, yeah, all right, yeah, now I think
Speaker 1: I used to have a Master card. Well, I don't know. Whatever.
Speaker 1: By the way, it wasn't just Trump offending people by
Speaker 1: handing people one hundred dollars to buy groceries, which apparently
Speaker 1: was awful. Did you see the Internet lose their crap
Speaker 1: over Clarence Thomas's post. So Clarence Thomas bought himself an
Speaker 1: RV and it looks like a really nice one, and
Speaker 1: for whatever reason, everyone well, you know, Clarence Thomas is
Speaker 1: the great Satan, right, that's essentially among the left. They
Speaker 1: absolutely hate this dude. But he bought an RV and
Speaker 1: they just can't deal to some of the tweets. Women
Speaker 1: are dying and leaving kids behind because Roe v. Wade
Speaker 1: was reversed. But hey, Clarence Thomas has a new RV.
Speaker 1: You know what, if I was Clarence Thomas, you know
Speaker 1: how you name a boat. You should name the RV
Speaker 1: and you should call it r V Wade