WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.200 --> 00:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>You see, some things are going to happen. What's going

2
00:00:10.199 --> 00:00:25.719
<v Speaker 1>to happen? What Plato of Athens stands is one of

3
00:00:25.760 --> 00:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the most influential figures in Western philosophy. A student of

4
00:00:29.199 --> 00:00:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Socrates and teacher of Aristotle, Plato wrote a unique dialogue

5
00:00:33.039 --> 00:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>form that blends drama with profound inquiry. His work span ethics,

6
00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:44.399
<v Speaker 1>political philosophy, psychology, epistemology, and metaphysics. Through vivid characters, often Socrates,

7
00:00:44.439 --> 00:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and imaginative stories are myths Plato explored and during questions

8
00:00:47.960 --> 00:00:52.719
<v Speaker 1>about justice, reality, knowledge, love, the soul, and the ideal society.

9
00:00:53.280 --> 00:00:57.039
<v Speaker 1>This episode delves into Plato's major dialogues and philosophical ideas,

10
00:00:57.200 --> 00:01:00.119
<v Speaker 1>from the historical trials of Socrates to the visionary theory

11
00:01:00.159 --> 00:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of forms and the famous allegory of the Cave, and

12
00:01:03.039 --> 00:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>drawing on scholarly insights to enrich our understanding. We have

13
00:01:07.120 --> 00:01:09.159
<v Speaker 1>journey through Plato's life and times, and now we will

14
00:01:09.159 --> 00:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>examine the key themes of his early, middle and late

15
00:01:11.640 --> 00:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>dialogues and discover how his blend of dramatic dialogue and

16
00:01:15.040 --> 00:01:19.799
<v Speaker 1>philosophical exploration created a living legacy that still shapes thought today.

17
00:01:21.120 --> 00:01:23.879
<v Speaker 1>His real name was Aristocles, but he became known as Plato,

18
00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:27.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a nickname referring to his broad physique or broad forehead.

19
00:01:27.799 --> 00:01:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Growing up during the Peloponnesian War, the young Plato witnessed

20
00:01:30.920 --> 00:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the political instability of Athens. In his twenties, Plato became

21
00:01:34.680 --> 00:01:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a devoted student of the philosopher Socrates, whose method of

22
00:01:37.439 --> 00:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>questioning everything left a deep mark on him. Socrates' charismatic

23
00:01:41.879 --> 00:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>quest for truth and his martyr like death were defining influences.

24
00:01:46.159 --> 00:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Thirty ninety nine BCE, the Athenian democracy tried and executed

25
00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Socrates for impiety and corrupting the youth. Plato, then about

26
00:01:54.319 --> 00:01:56.519
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, was profoundly affected by the loss of his

27
00:01:56.599 --> 00:02:00.719
<v Speaker 1>mentor the apology. Plato's earliest dialogue is actually an account

28
00:02:00.760 --> 00:02:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of Socrates's defense speech at the trial, and through it

29
00:02:03.920 --> 00:02:08.479
<v Speaker 1>Plato ensures Socrates's voice and ideals would live on. After

30
00:02:08.520 --> 00:02:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Socrates' death, Plato withdrew from Athens for a time, traveling

31
00:02:11.599 --> 00:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps to Megara Sirene in North Africa, Italy, and Egypt.

32
00:02:16.719 --> 00:02:20.199
<v Speaker 1>These travels exposed him to other philosophies, such as Pythagoreans

33
00:02:20.199 --> 00:02:24.319
<v Speaker 1>in Italy, that would inform his later work. Around three

34
00:02:24.360 --> 00:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven BCE, Plato returned to Athens and founded the Academy,

35
00:02:28.439 --> 00:02:32.439
<v Speaker 1>often considered the first university. The Academy was an institution

36
00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>for higher learning situated in a grove of olo trees

37
00:02:35.039 --> 00:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>sacred to the hero Academus, just outside Athens. There, Plato

38
00:02:40.759 --> 00:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>taught and engaged students in dialogue for decades. Among the

39
00:02:43.840 --> 00:02:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Academy's most illustrious students was Aristotle, who studied there for

40
00:02:47.240 --> 00:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. The Academy became Plato's home base for the

41
00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:53.879
<v Speaker 1>rest of his life. Plato also made at least two

42
00:02:53.919 --> 00:02:57.039
<v Speaker 1>more trips to Sicily in hopes of guiding Syracusan tyrants

43
00:02:57.360 --> 00:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Dionysius the Elder and the Younger in his life. Later years,

44
00:03:00.520 --> 00:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Plato concentrated on teaching and writing at the Academy until

45
00:03:03.599 --> 00:03:08.879
<v Speaker 1>his death in three forty seven BCE. Understanding Plato's historical

46
00:03:08.879 --> 00:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>contexts enriches our appreciation of his dialogues. He lived through

47
00:03:12.680 --> 00:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the decline of Athenian democracy and the rise of Macedonian power,

48
00:03:16.159 --> 00:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>through war and civil strife, through the trial of Socrates

49
00:03:19.159 --> 00:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and its aftermen. These experiences gave Plato a first hand

50
00:03:22.360 --> 00:03:26.159
<v Speaker 1>view of political instability and moral uncertainty, fueling his desire

51
00:03:26.199 --> 00:03:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to fine unshakable truths and better ways to order society.

52
00:03:30.240 --> 00:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>The figure of Socrates, questioning ironic, unyielding in his pursuit

53
00:03:34.080 --> 00:03:37.919
<v Speaker 1>of virtue dominates Plato's early works and remains a touchstone throughout.

54
00:03:38.520 --> 00:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>In his sense, Plato's philosophy can be seen as his

55
00:03:41.000 --> 00:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>attempt to preserve Socrates's spirit while also moving beyond Socratic

56
00:03:45.000 --> 00:03:49.879
<v Speaker 1>skepticism to construct a positive philosophical system. To achieve this,

57
00:03:50.280 --> 00:03:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Plato wrote in an inventive dialogue form that invites the

58
00:03:53.199 --> 00:03:56.879
<v Speaker 1>reader into the debate. Before diving into the content of

59
00:03:56.919 --> 00:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the dialogues, let us briefly consider the distinctive method of

60
00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>philosophical writing. Nearly all the Plato's surviving works are written

61
00:04:03.840 --> 00:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>as dialogues conversations between characters, often historical figures, probing philosophical questions,

62
00:04:10.919 --> 00:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>rather than writing treaties or lectures. Plato presents philosophy in

63
00:04:14.319 --> 00:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic format, complete with settings and characters, which gives

64
00:04:17.800 --> 00:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>his work a rich literary texture. We meet Socrates debating

65
00:04:22.079 --> 00:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in an Athenian marketplace, or conversing at a drinking party,

66
00:04:25.399 --> 00:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>or talking quietly in prison before his death. These dialogues

67
00:04:29.199 --> 00:04:31.319
<v Speaker 1>are not plays meant for the stage, but they are

68
00:04:31.360 --> 00:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>carefully crafted dramas of ideas. Plato's gift for vivid characterization

69
00:04:36.199 --> 00:04:40.199
<v Speaker 1>in setting a jubilant symposium, a gymnasium, the courtroom, or

70
00:04:40.199 --> 00:04:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the shadows of a cave, makes abstract ideas come alive

71
00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as human experience. Socrates is the central figure of most dialogues.

72
00:04:48.680 --> 00:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>He is present in all of them except one, the Laws.

73
00:04:51.759 --> 00:04:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Through Socrates, Plato honors his mentor's legacy, but also uses

74
00:04:55.839 --> 00:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>him as a mouthpiece for exploring Plato's own ideas. Importantly,

75
00:05:00.160 --> 00:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Plato never speaks in his own voice in the dialogues.

76
00:05:03.040 --> 00:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>There is no professor Plato explaining his doctrine. Instead, he

77
00:05:07.279 --> 00:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>lets arguments unfold through questions and answers, the Socratic method

78
00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:15.959
<v Speaker 1>of inquiry. Socrates or another lead character poses questions to others,

79
00:05:16.279 --> 00:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>refutes floida, answers, and gradually guides the discussion towards deeper understanding.

80
00:05:21.279 --> 00:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>This method showcases philosophy as a live process of questioning assumptions.

81
00:05:26.120 --> 00:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It also means Plato's works often don't present doctrines neatly,

82
00:05:29.800 --> 00:05:33.399
<v Speaker 1>but rather lead readers to think for themselves. As the

83
00:05:33.439 --> 00:05:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Stanford Encyclopedia Philosophy notes Plato is far more exploratory, incompletely systematic, elusive,

84
00:05:39.240 --> 00:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and playful than philosophers like Aristotle or cant He does

85
00:05:43.160 --> 00:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not hand us a finalized system of thought. Instead, many

86
00:05:46.160 --> 00:05:50.439
<v Speaker 1>dialogues end inconclusively or even with more puzzles. Plato seems

87
00:05:50.480 --> 00:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to want the reader to participate in the inquiry. Readers

88
00:05:53.920 --> 00:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of a Platonic dialogue are drawn into thinking for themselves

89
00:05:56.839 --> 00:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>about the issues raised, provoking a sense of philosophy as

90
00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a living and unfinished subject to which they must contribute.

91
00:06:04.600 --> 00:06:08.519
<v Speaker 1>This open ended dialectical style is deliberate. Plato orphan raises

92
00:06:08.639 --> 00:06:12.079
<v Speaker 1>profound questions what is virtue? What is justice? Is the

93
00:06:12.120 --> 00:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>soul of mortal and examines them from multiple sides, without

94
00:06:15.319 --> 00:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>always reaching a final answer. In u Thipro, Socrates in

95
00:06:19.600 --> 00:06:22.519
<v Speaker 1>a priest struggle to define piety and end in perplexity.

96
00:06:23.360 --> 00:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>In Theotitis, Socrates and a young mathematician explore what is

97
00:06:26.959 --> 00:06:31.480
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and consider then critique definitions like knowledge is sense

98
00:06:31.519 --> 00:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>perception or knowledge is true belief, with an account ultimately

99
00:06:35.120 --> 00:06:39.879
<v Speaker 1>concluding they have not yet found a satisfactory definition. Imparmenides

100
00:06:39.959 --> 00:06:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and Elder philosopher Parmenides subjects young Socrates theory or forms

101
00:06:44.399 --> 00:06:48.519
<v Speaker 1>to relentless criticism, raising problems of infinite regress and logical

102
00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>contradiction that are left unresolved rather than weaken the dialogue.

103
00:06:52.839 --> 00:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>These unanswered puzzles are the point Plato is teaching us

104
00:06:56.399 --> 00:06:59.519
<v Speaker 1>to think, not merely telling us what to think. As

105
00:06:59.560 --> 00:07:02.399
<v Speaker 1>one skyt Dollar observes, Plato's work gives us a few

106
00:07:02.519 --> 00:07:06.199
<v Speaker 1>key ideas, along with a series of suggestions and problems

107
00:07:06.240 --> 00:07:09.879
<v Speaker 1>about how those ideas are to be interrogated, leaving further

108
00:07:09.959 --> 00:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>work for the readers themselves. This dynamic quality is why

109
00:07:14.160 --> 00:07:17.519
<v Speaker 1>Plato is often considered the ideal introduction to philosophy. The

110
00:07:17.600 --> 00:07:21.319
<v Speaker 1>dialogues don't just preset doctrines, they demonstrate the activity of

111
00:07:21.319 --> 00:07:25.319
<v Speaker 1>philosophical inquiry. Despite the variety in topics and tones across

112
00:07:25.319 --> 00:07:28.199
<v Speaker 1>Plato's dialogues, it is common to divide them into three

113
00:07:28.240 --> 00:07:32.639
<v Speaker 1>broad groups, Early, Middle, and late dialogues. These early dialogues

114
00:07:32.639 --> 00:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>are closest to the historical Socrates in style and focus

115
00:07:35.720 --> 00:07:39.279
<v Speaker 1>mainly on ethical questions, often ending without a firm conclusion.

116
00:07:40.240 --> 00:07:43.759
<v Speaker 1>The middle dialogues mark the development of Plato's own philosophical theories.

117
00:07:44.040 --> 00:07:47.079
<v Speaker 1>Here we see the introduction of his theia forms, discussions

118
00:07:47.079 --> 00:07:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of the soul's immortality, the nature of knowledge, love, and

119
00:07:50.360 --> 00:07:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the ideal state. These works still feature Socrates as a protagonist,

120
00:07:54.519 --> 00:07:58.839
<v Speaker 1>but are generally thought to convey Plato's views more than Socrates. Finally,

121
00:07:58.879 --> 00:08:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the late dialogues are more technical and often involve new

122
00:08:01.480 --> 00:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>characters or a diminished role for Socrates. In the late period,

123
00:08:05.439 --> 00:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Plato revisits and sometimes revises ideas from the Middle period.

124
00:08:09.240 --> 00:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, Parmenides critically examines the form theory, Sophas and

125
00:08:13.199 --> 00:08:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Statesmen introduce an iliatic stranger as the main interlocator instead

126
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:21.079
<v Speaker 1>of Socrates, and Laws presents a practical political philosophy without

127
00:08:21.079 --> 00:08:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Socrates at all. With this orientation to Plato's method and

128
00:08:24.360 --> 00:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the rough chronology of his works, we can now explore

129
00:08:27.079 --> 00:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>some of his major dialogues and ideas in more depth.

130
00:08:30.160 --> 00:08:33.279
<v Speaker 1>We will proceed loosely in chronological order of the dialogues,

131
00:08:33.320 --> 00:08:36.519
<v Speaker 1>beginning with those that center in Socrates' trial and teachings,

132
00:08:36.840 --> 00:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>moving through the middle dialogues or Plato's distinctive doctrines emerge,

133
00:08:40.480 --> 00:08:43.639
<v Speaker 1>and ending with the later works. We will proceed loosely

134
00:08:43.679 --> 00:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in chronological order of the dialogues, beginning with those that

135
00:08:46.799 --> 00:08:50.039
<v Speaker 1>center on Socrates' trial in Teachings, moving through the middle

136
00:08:50.039 --> 00:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>dialogues where Plato's distinctive doctrines emerge, and ending with the

137
00:08:53.559 --> 00:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>later works. Plato's earliest dialogues depict the final days of

138
00:08:57.879 --> 00:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Socrates and introduced core Socratic pres snciples of ethics. The

139
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Apology of Socrates is not an apology in the modern sense,

140
00:09:04.559 --> 00:09:08.559
<v Speaker 1>but an apologia, a defense speech. Plato presents Socrates at

141
00:09:08.639 --> 00:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>age seventy, standing before the five hundred and one man

142
00:09:11.200 --> 00:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Athenian jury in three ninety nine BCE to answer charges

143
00:09:14.879 --> 00:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of impiety and corrupting the youth. The scene is historic,

144
00:09:19.360 --> 00:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and Plato likely witnessed it in person. In the dialogue,

145
00:09:23.279 --> 00:09:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Socrates delivers an unyielding defense of his life, devoted to

146
00:09:26.360 --> 00:09:29.799
<v Speaker 1>questioning in virtue. He famously compares himself to a gadfly

147
00:09:30.039 --> 00:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>stinging the lazy horse of Athens, trying to rouse the

148
00:09:33.000 --> 00:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>city to self examination. He recounts how his friend Caaphon

149
00:09:36.759 --> 00:09:39.639
<v Speaker 1>asked the Delphic oracle if anyone was wiser than Socrates,

150
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and the oracle replied, no one was wiser. Socrates interpreted

151
00:09:44.159 --> 00:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this as a divine mission. He was only wise in

152
00:09:46.879 --> 00:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>so far as he knew that he knew nothing, whereas

153
00:09:49.639 --> 00:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>others falsely believed themselves wise. Thus he went about examining politicians, poets,

154
00:09:55.240 --> 00:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and craftsmen, exposing their ignorance, which earned him powerful enemies.

155
00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>In the Apology, Plato's Socrates definally refuses to give up philosophizing,

156
00:10:05.159 --> 00:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>even if it means death. I owe a greater obedience

157
00:10:08.480 --> 00:10:11.879
<v Speaker 1>to God than to you, Socrates tells the jurors, insisting

158
00:10:11.879 --> 00:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>he will continue to question anyone he meets about virtue

159
00:10:14.720 --> 00:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and truth. He admonishes the court that killing him will

160
00:10:18.279 --> 00:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>harm Athens more than it harms him, for you will

161
00:10:21.240 --> 00:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>not easily find anyone to take my place in urging

162
00:10:24.360 --> 00:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the city toward goodness. Socrates even rejects the usual emotional

163
00:10:29.279 --> 00:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>appeals for mercy, refusing to parade his family in court

164
00:10:32.559 --> 00:10:35.919
<v Speaker 1>or weep for pity. Such tactics, he implies, would betray

165
00:10:35.960 --> 00:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>his principles. Ultimately, the jury convicts Socrates by a narrow

166
00:10:40.480 --> 00:10:44.519
<v Speaker 1>vote and sentences him to death. Socrates accepts the verdict

167
00:10:44.600 --> 00:10:47.399
<v Speaker 1>with equanimity. In a parting shot, he tells the jurors

168
00:10:47.399 --> 00:10:49.639
<v Speaker 1>that nothing can harm a good man, either in life

169
00:10:49.759 --> 00:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>or after death, and that his own pursuit of virtue

170
00:10:52.600 --> 00:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>means even death cannot truly hurt him. One of the

171
00:10:55.519 --> 00:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>most iconic moments in apologies when Socrates declares that if

172
00:10:58.360 --> 00:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>they offered to acquit him on the condition that he

173
00:11:00.759 --> 00:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ceases philosophizing, he would decline, for the unexamined life is

174
00:11:04.480 --> 00:11:07.879
<v Speaker 1>not worth living for a human being, as he puts it,

175
00:11:08.519 --> 00:11:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to let no day pass without discussing goodness and all

176
00:11:11.399 --> 00:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the other subjects is really the very best thing that

177
00:11:14.120 --> 00:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a man can do, and that life without this sort

178
00:11:16.480 --> 00:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of examination is not worth living. This ringing statement, the

179
00:11:20.519 --> 00:11:23.879
<v Speaker 1>unexamined life is not worth living, has echoed through history

180
00:11:23.919 --> 00:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>as a cult to reflection and critical thinking. Plato's apology,

181
00:11:28.600 --> 00:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>though essentially a monologue, sets the stage for the themes

182
00:11:31.600 --> 00:11:34.519
<v Speaker 1>of moral integrity, to quest for truth, and the tension

183
00:11:34.559 --> 00:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>between the philosopher and society. Two other early dialogues, Euthipro

184
00:11:39.639 --> 00:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>and Creto, complement the apology by showing Socrates' attitude before

185
00:11:43.679 --> 00:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and after the trial. In Euthyphro, set just before Socrates

186
00:11:48.000 --> 00:11:52.279
<v Speaker 1>is hearing, Socrates encounts as a zealously religious man, Euthipro,

187
00:11:52.559 --> 00:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and they debate the nature of piety holiness. Socrates, about

188
00:11:56.279 --> 00:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to be prosecuted for impiety, playfully yet seriously questions you Thidro,

189
00:12:00.519 --> 00:12:03.519
<v Speaker 1>who claims to know the will of the gods. They

190
00:12:03.559 --> 00:12:06.159
<v Speaker 1>examine whether something is pious because the gods love it,

191
00:12:06.399 --> 00:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or do the god's love it because it is pious,

192
00:12:08.759 --> 00:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a question that introduces a classic dilemma about the grounding

193
00:12:11.759 --> 00:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of morality. The dialogue ends without a clear answer when

194
00:12:16.360 --> 00:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it demonstrates Socrates's method of probing definition and reveals the

195
00:12:19.480 --> 00:12:24.039
<v Speaker 1>difficulty of pinning down moral concepts. Eutherfro leaves the reader

196
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with a sharpened sense of the question rather than a solution,

197
00:12:27.360 --> 00:12:31.799
<v Speaker 1>which is characteristic of the early Socratic dialogues. After the trial,

198
00:12:32.039 --> 00:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Siicro takes us to Socrates's prison cell as he awaits execution.

199
00:12:36.399 --> 00:12:38.919
<v Speaker 1>His old friend Grido arrives at dawn, offering a plan

200
00:12:39.000 --> 00:12:43.519
<v Speaker 1>to smuggle Socrates out to safety. Here, Plato dramatizes a

201
00:12:43.519 --> 00:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>stork moral choice. Should Socrates break the law and escape

202
00:12:47.120 --> 00:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to save his life, or accept illegal judgment even if

203
00:12:50.080 --> 00:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it was unjust. Credo implores Socrates to flee for the

204
00:12:53.360 --> 00:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sake of his children and his friend's reputations. They don't

205
00:12:56.639 --> 00:13:00.519
<v Speaker 1>want to be seen as not trying to save him. Socrates, however,

206
00:13:00.559 --> 00:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>engages Creto on a dialogue about justice. Would it be

207
00:13:03.519 --> 00:13:07.639
<v Speaker 1>right to repay injustice with another injustice? Socrates concludes it

208
00:13:07.639 --> 00:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>would not. He personifies the laws of Athens in a

209
00:13:10.639 --> 00:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>speech sometimes called the Speech of the Laws, where they

210
00:13:13.519 --> 00:13:16.519
<v Speaker 1>argue that Socrates, by choosing to live in Athens, agreed

211
00:13:16.519 --> 00:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to abide by its laws, and that escaping would harm

212
00:13:19.480 --> 00:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the city's legal order. One must obey that commands of

213
00:13:22.879 --> 00:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>one city and country, Socrates says, an essence, even if

214
00:13:26.000 --> 00:13:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the city ers in one's individual case. In the end,

215
00:13:29.840 --> 00:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Socrates remains in prison, choosing fidelity to the law in

216
00:13:33.279 --> 00:13:37.799
<v Speaker 1>his Principles over Life. Creto thus highlights Socrates's integrity. He

217
00:13:37.840 --> 00:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>will not compromise his ethics for convenience, reinforcing the image

218
00:13:41.360 --> 00:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of Socrates as a martyr for the rule of law

219
00:13:43.480 --> 00:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and philosophy. Together, Apology, Euthyphro and Creto paint a compelling

220
00:13:48.480 --> 00:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>portrait of Socrates, a man guided by conscious and reason,

221
00:13:51.960 --> 00:13:54.759
<v Speaker 1>fearless in the face of death, committed to seeking virtue

222
00:13:54.799 --> 00:13:58.039
<v Speaker 1>above all else. These works also set up many of

223
00:13:58.039 --> 00:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the big questions Plato will tackle more abst exactly later,

224
00:14:01.159 --> 00:14:04.639
<v Speaker 1>What is justice? What is piety? How should a person live?

225
00:14:05.039 --> 00:14:10.039
<v Speaker 1>They provide the dramatic and moral backdrop of Plato's subsequent explorations. Notably,

226
00:14:10.080 --> 00:14:13.519
<v Speaker 1>these earlier dialogues do not introduce Plato's own metaphysical doctrines.

227
00:14:13.720 --> 00:14:15.639
<v Speaker 1>There is no talk of forms or an apholyte or

228
00:14:15.679 --> 00:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>cosmology yet, except in passing. That changes with the dialogues

229
00:14:19.360 --> 00:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that Plato wrote in the next phase, which begin to

230
00:14:21.799 --> 00:14:27.759
<v Speaker 1>venture beyond Socratic ethics into deeper philosophical words. An important

231
00:14:27.799 --> 00:14:31.799
<v Speaker 1>transitional dialogue is the Meno, which bridges Socratic ethics in

232
00:14:31.799 --> 00:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Plato's emerging ideas on knowledge. Meno begins with a straightforward

233
00:14:35.879 --> 00:14:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Socratic question, can virtue be taught? Meno, a young aristocrat

234
00:14:40.840 --> 00:14:45.679
<v Speaker 1>first ask Socrates whether virtue urete excellence is teachable, But

235
00:14:45.840 --> 00:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>quickly the discussion shifts to a more basic puzzle, what

236
00:14:49.320 --> 00:14:53.879
<v Speaker 1>is virtue? Socrates insist they must define virtue before deciding

237
00:14:53.919 --> 00:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>how it's acquired. Meno proposes a few definitions. Virtue for

238
00:14:58.000 --> 00:15:00.879
<v Speaker 1>a man is managing public affairs well, for a woman

239
00:15:01.159 --> 00:15:04.759
<v Speaker 1>managing the home well, and et cetera. But Socrates refutes them,

240
00:15:05.000 --> 00:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seeking a single definition that covers all virtues. Meno grows

241
00:15:08.960 --> 00:15:12.759
<v Speaker 1>frustrated and compares Socrates to a torpedo fish that numbs

242
00:15:12.799 --> 00:15:16.519
<v Speaker 1>whoever comes near. He feels paralyzed and unable to answer.

243
00:15:17.039 --> 00:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>This leads to Meno's paradox, how can you search for

244
00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:22.679
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of something when you don't know what it is?

245
00:15:23.600 --> 00:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>If you know it, you don't need to search. If

246
00:15:26.360 --> 00:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't know it, you wouldn't recognize it even if

247
00:15:28.720 --> 00:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you found it. Socrates responds with a bold idea that

248
00:15:32.279 --> 00:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>becomes a cornerstone of Platonic thought, the theory of recollection.

249
00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:39.559
<v Speaker 1>He suggests that the soul is immortal and has learned

250
00:15:39.600 --> 00:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>all things in past lives, so what we call learning

251
00:15:42.360 --> 00:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is merely recollecting what the soul already knows at some

252
00:15:45.159 --> 00:15:50.799
<v Speaker 1>deeper level. To demonstrate, Socrates famously calls over an enslaved boy, and,

253
00:15:50.840 --> 00:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>through questioning alone without giving answers, leads the boy to

254
00:15:54.240 --> 00:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>work out a geometry problem doubling the area of a square.

255
00:15:58.559 --> 00:16:02.039
<v Speaker 1>The boy, who has no formal education, eventually arise at

256
00:16:02.039 --> 00:16:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the correct solution, which Socrates takes as evidence that this

257
00:16:05.519 --> 00:16:09.039
<v Speaker 1>knowledge was latent in him all along. This implies that

258
00:16:09.039 --> 00:16:12.759
<v Speaker 1>true knowledge is innate and awakening it requires proper questioning.

259
00:16:13.720 --> 00:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>In Meno, this idea is still presented as a hypothesis

260
00:16:16.960 --> 00:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>linked to a mythic account of reincarnation, but it marks

261
00:16:20.399 --> 00:16:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the first appearance of Plato's belief in an eternal soul

262
00:16:23.279 --> 00:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and in a reality of knowledge beyond the empirical world,

263
00:16:26.519 --> 00:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>notions that will be fully developed soon to the question

264
00:16:30.480 --> 00:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>can virtue be taught? Meno ends somewhat ambiguously. Socrates and

265
00:16:35.519 --> 00:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Meno reach a provisional conclusion that virtue comes not from teaching,

266
00:16:39.279 --> 00:16:41.919
<v Speaker 1>since no one can point to a reliable teacher of virtue,

267
00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:45.159
<v Speaker 1>nor simply from nature, but perhaps by a sort of

268
00:16:45.200 --> 00:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>divine gift or inspiration. The dialogue thus leaves us with

269
00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:53.399
<v Speaker 1>a tantalizing suggestion that virtue ultimately requires right opinion granted

270
00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>by the gods, or, as Plato might later frame it,

271
00:16:56.240 --> 00:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of the good itself, but it stops short of

272
00:16:59.320 --> 00:17:03.799
<v Speaker 1>articulating the full theory. In essence, Meno poses the problems

273
00:17:03.840 --> 00:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that Plato's later philosophy will answer. It asks about the

274
00:17:07.480 --> 00:17:10.319
<v Speaker 1>nature of virtue and knowledge, and hints that answers lie

275
00:17:10.359 --> 00:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in understanding the immortal soul and its knowledge of eternal truths.

276
00:17:15.079 --> 00:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>These themes come into Frutition and Fido. One of Plato's

277
00:17:18.039 --> 00:17:21.519
<v Speaker 1>richest and most revere dialogues, Fido is set on the

278
00:17:21.519 --> 00:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>final day of socrates life. A Socrates sits in his

279
00:17:24.680 --> 00:17:27.559
<v Speaker 1>prison cell in the company of friends, calmly awaiting the

280
00:17:27.599 --> 00:17:31.759
<v Speaker 1>poison hemlock Fido. A young fellower recounts the scene to

281
00:17:31.839 --> 00:17:36.079
<v Speaker 1>others afterwards, lending the dialogue a poignant narrative frame. Fido

282
00:17:36.200 --> 00:17:38.319
<v Speaker 1>is both a character and the narrator of the story.

283
00:17:39.279 --> 00:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>This dialogue combines dramatic power the depiction of Socrates's last

284
00:17:43.440 --> 00:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>hours with profound philosophical argument. It is in Fido that

285
00:17:47.480 --> 00:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Plato first lays out his own metaphysical and epistemological doctrines

286
00:17:51.039 --> 00:17:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in a clear way, so much so the ancient commentators

287
00:17:54.279 --> 00:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>nicknamed the Dialogue on the Soul. The Fido covers three

288
00:17:58.039 --> 00:18:01.079
<v Speaker 1>main topics, the immortality of the soul, the theory of

289
00:18:01.160 --> 00:18:05.039
<v Speaker 1>recollection further developed from Meno, and most importantly, the theory

290
00:18:05.039 --> 00:18:10.039
<v Speaker 1>of forms. Plato's most famous contribution to philosophy, presented here

291
00:18:10.119 --> 00:18:14.599
<v Speaker 1>arguably for the first time dramatic context, is that Socrates's

292
00:18:14.680 --> 00:18:17.839
<v Speaker 1>friends saddened by his impending death, ask him why he

293
00:18:17.920 --> 00:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>seems unafraid. This prompt Socrates to explain why a true

294
00:18:22.200 --> 00:18:26.519
<v Speaker 1>philosopher should not fear death. He argues that philosophy is

295
00:18:26.599 --> 00:18:29.839
<v Speaker 1>essentially a preparation for dying, because it involves separating the

296
00:18:29.839 --> 00:18:32.519
<v Speaker 1>soul as much as possible from the bodily, desires and

297
00:18:32.559 --> 00:18:37.200
<v Speaker 1>senses in order to attain knowledge of eternal truths. The soul,

298
00:18:37.319 --> 00:18:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Socrates claims, is immortal, and death is merely the soul's

299
00:18:40.880 --> 00:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>separation from the body. To this support, he offers four

300
00:18:45.079 --> 00:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>arguments for the soul's immortality. One the cyclical argument. Opposites

301
00:18:50.400 --> 00:18:53.599
<v Speaker 1>come from opposites, so life must come from death as

302
00:18:53.640 --> 00:18:57.839
<v Speaker 1>death comes from life, implying an endless cycle. To the

303
00:18:57.839 --> 00:19:01.759
<v Speaker 1>theory of recollection, learning is re collecting eternal truths, which

304
00:19:01.799 --> 00:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>suggests the soul existed before birth to acquire that knowledge.

305
00:19:05.839 --> 00:19:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Three the affinity argument. The soul is invisible, non composite,

306
00:19:10.599 --> 00:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and divine like the forms, so it naturally survives the

307
00:19:13.480 --> 00:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>death of the body. And later four the final argument,

308
00:19:17.519 --> 00:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>drawing on the form of life, the soul always brings

309
00:19:20.519 --> 00:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>life and thus cannot admit death. In the course of

310
00:19:24.039 --> 00:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>these arguments, Plato introduces forms explicitly. For example, he speaks

311
00:19:29.160 --> 00:19:32.599
<v Speaker 1>of the equal itself, the beautiful itself, to just itself,

312
00:19:32.960 --> 00:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>abstract ideals that are grasped not by the senses but

313
00:19:35.759 --> 00:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>by the mind. At one point, Socrates asks, how do

314
00:19:39.319 --> 00:19:43.079
<v Speaker 1>we even form the concept of perfect equality? We've never

315
00:19:43.119 --> 00:19:45.799
<v Speaker 1>seen two sticks or stones that are exactly equal in

316
00:19:45.880 --> 00:19:48.599
<v Speaker 1>length or quality. Yet we have an idea of equal

317
00:19:48.599 --> 00:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>itself that he says came from before birth, when our

318
00:19:53.279 --> 00:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>souls beheld the pure form of equal, and we recall

319
00:19:56.440 --> 00:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it when we encounter approximate equalities in life. Early he

320
00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:03.759
<v Speaker 1>suggests we recognize the grease of beauty or justice by

321
00:20:03.799 --> 00:20:06.759
<v Speaker 1>comparing them to the perfect form of beauty or form

322
00:20:06.839 --> 00:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of justice our soul once new. This is Plato's theory

323
00:20:10.680 --> 00:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of forms, emerging the idea that beyond the imperfect world

324
00:20:13.920 --> 00:20:17.799
<v Speaker 1>of changeable things we perceive, there is a higher, unchanging reality,

325
00:20:18.160 --> 00:20:21.599
<v Speaker 1>a realm of forms or ideas ETOs in Greek, which

326
00:20:21.640 --> 00:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>are the perfect archetypes of all properties and values. The

327
00:20:24.720 --> 00:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>physical world we know through the senses is only an

328
00:20:27.359 --> 00:20:30.839
<v Speaker 1>imitation of the pure, eternal and unchanging world of the forms.

329
00:20:31.759 --> 00:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>The forms are more real than the objects we see.

330
00:20:34.680 --> 00:20:38.759
<v Speaker 1>They are invisible, eternal, and intelligible, known by the intellect,

331
00:20:38.920 --> 00:20:42.599
<v Speaker 1>not the eyes. In Fito, this theory is woven into

332
00:20:42.640 --> 00:20:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the discussion of the soul's immortality. The soul, being akin

333
00:20:46.400 --> 00:20:49.599
<v Speaker 1>to the divine forms, can know them, end like them,

334
00:20:49.759 --> 00:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is not destroyed when the body perishes. The foto is

335
00:20:53.039 --> 00:20:56.559
<v Speaker 1>thus a milestone. It gives us Plato's metaphysics forms. In

336
00:20:56.599 --> 00:21:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Plato's epistemology, learning as recollection of forms is one narrative,

337
00:21:01.319 --> 00:21:05.319
<v Speaker 1>it also doesn't shy from objections. Plato has two interlocutors,

338
00:21:05.839 --> 00:21:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Samias and Sebes, raised thoughtful challenges. For example, Sema suggests

339
00:21:10.599 --> 00:21:12.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe the soul is like the harmony of a liar,

340
00:21:12.920 --> 00:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful result of the parts, but destroyed when the

341
00:21:15.720 --> 00:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>instrument is destroyed. Sebes worries that even if the soul

342
00:21:19.200 --> 00:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>outlines the body, perhaps it wears out after many reincarnations.

343
00:21:23.680 --> 00:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Socrates answers these, reinforcing the theory that the soul is

344
00:21:27.240 --> 00:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>an independent substance that pre exists and outlives the body.

345
00:21:31.480 --> 00:21:35.039
<v Speaker 1>At the dialogue's climax, Socrates recounts a mythic vision of

346
00:21:35.039 --> 00:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the afterlife. Virtuous souls dwell on earth's surface, or even

347
00:21:38.720 --> 00:21:42.279
<v Speaker 1>ascend to a pure realm of ideal forms, whereas in

348
00:21:42.359 --> 00:21:47.079
<v Speaker 1>pure souls are dragged back into bodily life. Finally, Socrates

349
00:21:47.079 --> 00:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>calmly drinks the hemlock and bids farewell, telling his grieving

350
00:21:50.720 --> 00:21:54.799
<v Speaker 1>friends not to weep. His serenity in facing death, sustained

351
00:21:54.799 --> 00:21:58.599
<v Speaker 1>by the conviction of the soul's immortality, provides a moving conclusion.

352
00:21:59.319 --> 00:22:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The feto is lablishes several major Platonic ideas, the immortality

353
00:22:03.880 --> 00:22:09.039
<v Speaker 1>of the soul, the existence of transcendent forms, beauty, justice, equality, good,

354
00:22:09.119 --> 00:22:11.799
<v Speaker 1>and so on. The notion that true knowledge is of

355
00:22:11.880 --> 00:22:14.559
<v Speaker 1>these forms and comes from the soul's recollection of them,

356
00:22:14.920 --> 00:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and the view that the philosophical life is a training

357
00:22:17.680 --> 00:22:21.759
<v Speaker 1>for the soul separation from the body, hence a preparation

358
00:22:21.960 --> 00:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>for death. We see Plato here building on Socratic ethics

359
00:22:26.799 --> 00:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>care for one's soul through virtue and wisdom and transforming

360
00:22:29.920 --> 00:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it with a grand of the worldly framework. Virtue, for Plato,

361
00:22:33.759 --> 00:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>will increasingly mean aligning the soul with the eternal good

362
00:22:37.000 --> 00:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and the order of the forms, rather than merely ethical

363
00:22:39.960 --> 00:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>behavior in day to day life. But before we get

364
00:22:43.200 --> 00:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>too far into abstraction, Plato will also turn to concrete

365
00:22:46.799 --> 00:22:50.559
<v Speaker 1>questions of politics and society, most notably in his masterpiece

366
00:22:50.680 --> 00:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>The Republic. It is in the Republic that Plato's philosophy

367
00:22:54.000 --> 00:22:58.519
<v Speaker 1>reaches its fullest scope, tying together is metaphysics, ethics, psychology,

368
00:22:58.680 --> 00:23:02.839
<v Speaker 1>epistemology and politolitical theory, and giving the world the unforgettable

369
00:23:02.880 --> 00:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Allegory of the Cave. Plato's Republic is a monumental dialogue

370
00:23:09.000 --> 00:23:11.759
<v Speaker 1>that has been hailed as one of Plato's longest dialogues

371
00:23:12.079 --> 00:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and his magnum opus framed, there's a conversation mainly between

372
00:23:16.240 --> 00:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Socrates and several friends, notably Plato's own brothers. The Republic

373
00:23:20.559 --> 00:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>begins with a straightforward question what is justice and is

374
00:23:25.000 --> 00:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the just life happier than the unjust life? But it

375
00:23:28.480 --> 00:23:33.599
<v Speaker 1>unfolds in a wide ranging exploration of morality, politics, psychology, education,

376
00:23:33.960 --> 00:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and metaphysics across its ten books. The dialogue dramatic setting

377
00:23:38.240 --> 00:23:40.839
<v Speaker 1>is the house of Cephalis during an all night festival,

378
00:23:41.039 --> 00:23:44.559
<v Speaker 1>and it starts casually Socrates speaking with the old gentleman

379
00:23:44.640 --> 00:23:49.039
<v Speaker 1>Cephalis about old age and justice. Soon, however, Socrates finds

380
00:23:49.079 --> 00:23:52.319
<v Speaker 1>himself challenged by the fiery threast Symmetris, who inserts that

381
00:23:52.480 --> 00:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>justice is nothing but the advantage of the stronger might

382
00:23:56.039 --> 00:24:00.759
<v Speaker 1>makes right. Socrates and his interlocators then embark on constructing

383
00:24:00.759 --> 00:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>an imaginary ideal city Calipolis, as a way to see

384
00:24:05.079 --> 00:24:09.559
<v Speaker 1>justice writ large before identifying it in the individual soul.

385
00:24:09.720 --> 00:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>This leads Plato to describe his vision of the best

386
00:24:12.160 --> 00:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>society and government, one ruled by philosopher kings. In the

387
00:24:16.480 --> 00:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>course of the Republic, Plato presents numerous influential ideas, the

388
00:24:20.720 --> 00:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>principle of specialization, each person doing the one thing they

389
00:24:23.920 --> 00:24:27.519
<v Speaker 1>are naturally best suited for, the division of society into

390
00:24:27.519 --> 00:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>three classes rulers, auxiliaries or soldiers and producers. The tripartite

391
00:24:33.160 --> 00:24:36.559
<v Speaker 1>soul theory, reasoned, spirit, and appetite as three parts of

392
00:24:36.559 --> 00:24:40.519
<v Speaker 1>the individual psyche, mirroring the classes of society. The role

393
00:24:40.559 --> 00:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>of education and censorship. The equality of women, at least

394
00:24:44.160 --> 00:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in the guardian classes. The communal life of the guardian,

395
00:24:47.440 --> 00:24:50.079
<v Speaker 1>with property and even family held in common to avoid

396
00:24:50.079 --> 00:24:55.559
<v Speaker 1>conflicts of interest, and the degeneration of political systems oligarchy,

397
00:24:55.839 --> 00:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>democracy tyranny. Plato does not shy from radical proposals, for example,

398
00:25:01.559 --> 00:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>abolishing the traditional family for the guardian class or selecting

399
00:25:05.319 --> 00:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>mating festivals by lot, rigged to promote the best offspring.

400
00:25:09.680 --> 00:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>These are meant to eliminate factionalism and keep the rulers

401
00:25:13.000 --> 00:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>focused on the common good. While these aspects of the

402
00:25:16.680 --> 00:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Republic are fascinating, we will focus on two of its

403
00:25:19.400 --> 00:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>most famous contributions, the concept of the philosopher king and

404
00:25:22.920 --> 00:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the allegory of the Cave, which together illustrate Plato's view

405
00:25:26.279 --> 00:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge, reality, and leadership. By Book five of the Republic,

406
00:25:30.559 --> 00:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Socrates has described a pretty austere utopia led by guardian elites.

407
00:25:34.559 --> 00:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But his friends ask who would ever be fit to

408
00:25:37.000 --> 00:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>rule such a city. Socrates answers with his boldest political idea,

409
00:25:41.400 --> 00:25:44.839
<v Speaker 1>Unless philosophers become kings in the cities, are those whom

410
00:25:44.880 --> 00:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we now call kings and rulers genuinely and adequately philosophize,

411
00:25:48.880 --> 00:25:51.319
<v Speaker 1>there will be no rest from its ills in the cities.

412
00:25:52.279 --> 00:25:54.279
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the only way to truly achieve a

413
00:25:54.440 --> 00:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>just society is to have philosopher kings rulers who love wisdom,

414
00:25:58.559 --> 00:26:00.519
<v Speaker 1>know the true forms of justice and good witness, and

415
00:26:00.559 --> 00:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>therefore can govern not by opinion our appetite, but by

416
00:26:03.480 --> 00:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of what is truly best This claim is startling

417
00:26:06.960 --> 00:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to his listeners, and Socrates spends considerable effort explaining who

418
00:26:10.880 --> 00:26:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the true philosophers are, distinguishing them from sophis or fake intellectuals,

419
00:26:15.599 --> 00:26:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and why they are uniquely qualified to rule. Philosophers, he says,

420
00:26:19.799 --> 00:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>are those who are able to grasp what always is,

421
00:26:23.200 --> 00:26:27.079
<v Speaker 1>the unchanging realities, the forms, as opposed to ordinary people,

422
00:26:27.079 --> 00:26:29.519
<v Speaker 1>who grope about in the realm of what comes into

423
00:26:29.559 --> 00:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>being and passes away the transient sensory world. To convey

424
00:26:33.720 --> 00:26:37.319
<v Speaker 1>this difference between knowledge and ignorance, Plato introduces three famous

425
00:26:37.359 --> 00:26:41.319
<v Speaker 1>analogies in Republic Books six and seven, the Sun, the

426
00:26:41.359 --> 00:26:44.319
<v Speaker 1>divided Line, and the cave. The form of the good

427
00:26:44.359 --> 00:26:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is compared to the sun. Just as the sun in

428
00:26:46.680 --> 00:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the visible world illuminates objects and enables sight, so the

429
00:26:50.000 --> 00:26:52.599
<v Speaker 1>good illuminates the forms and gives truth to the knower.

430
00:26:53.559 --> 00:26:56.759
<v Speaker 1>The divided line is a visual metaphor that segments reality

431
00:26:56.920 --> 00:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and our awareness of it into four levels. At the lowest,

432
00:27:01.119 --> 00:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>imagination shadows, reflections, then belief, physical things, then mathematical reasoning,

433
00:27:07.119 --> 00:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>abstract thought, and highest of all, dialectical understanding of the forms,

434
00:27:12.160 --> 00:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>culminating in the form of the good. But the most

435
00:27:15.400 --> 00:27:18.440
<v Speaker 1>vivid and narrative of these is the allegory of the Cave.

436
00:27:19.720 --> 00:27:23.079
<v Speaker 1>In Book seven of the Republic, Socrates ask Glucon and

437
00:27:23.319 --> 00:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>us the readers, to imagine a strange and powerful scene,

438
00:27:27.079 --> 00:27:30.319
<v Speaker 1>an allegory that has become perhaps the most famous passage

439
00:27:30.359 --> 00:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of all philosophy. The allegory of the cave. Picture and

440
00:27:35.119 --> 00:27:39.079
<v Speaker 1>underground cave where humans have been imprisoned since childhood, chained

441
00:27:39.119 --> 00:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>by the legs and necks so they cannot move or

442
00:27:41.240 --> 00:27:44.759
<v Speaker 1>turn their heads. They face a wall. Behind them, a

443
00:27:44.839 --> 00:27:47.519
<v Speaker 1>fire burns. In between the fire and the prisoners runs

444
00:27:47.559 --> 00:27:52.079
<v Speaker 1>a walkway where others carry objects and puppets. The prisoners

445
00:27:52.119 --> 00:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>see only the shadows of these objects cast on the

446
00:27:54.480 --> 00:27:57.079
<v Speaker 1>wall in front of them. They hear only echoes, the

447
00:27:57.160 --> 00:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>voices the people behind them speaking, which they naturally assume

448
00:28:00.480 --> 00:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>come from the shadows. Having never known anything else, these

449
00:28:04.039 --> 00:28:06.799
<v Speaker 1>prisoners take the shadows to be the real things. They're

450
00:28:06.960 --> 00:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like us, Socrates says poignantly, for we too often accept

451
00:28:10.480 --> 00:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the world of our senses as the truth. Now imagine

452
00:28:13.960 --> 00:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>one prisoner is freed and compelled to stand up and

453
00:28:15.920 --> 00:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>turn around. At first, the firelight hurts his eyes, and

454
00:28:19.200 --> 00:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the shapes he sees the actual objects being carried are confusing.

455
00:28:23.839 --> 00:28:26.079
<v Speaker 1>He might prefer to turn back to the familiar shadows

456
00:28:26.079 --> 00:28:28.839
<v Speaker 1>on the wall and believe those are more real. But

457
00:28:28.880 --> 00:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>suppose someone drags this prisoner out of the cave into

458
00:28:31.359 --> 00:28:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the daylight above. Blinded by the sun. At first, he

459
00:28:34.839 --> 00:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>gradually acclimates. First he can only see shadows and reflections outside,

460
00:28:39.359 --> 00:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>ironically similar to what he saw in the cave. Then

461
00:28:41.960 --> 00:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he sees things like trees, animals, people directly, and finally

462
00:28:45.680 --> 00:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>he can even look at the sun itself, realizing it

463
00:28:48.480 --> 00:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is the source of light and life. This liberated prisoner

464
00:28:52.079 --> 00:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>undergoes a complete transformation of understanding. He now knows the

465
00:28:56.000 --> 00:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>shadows in the cave were mere illusions and that a

466
00:28:58.440 --> 00:29:02.839
<v Speaker 1>far richer, brighter reality exists outside. Feeling pity for his

467
00:29:02.920 --> 00:29:05.279
<v Speaker 1>fellow prisoners, he goes back down into the cave to

468
00:29:05.319 --> 00:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>free them, but re entering the darkness, he can't see

469
00:29:08.480 --> 00:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>well his eyes now used to the sun, and the

470
00:29:10.920 --> 00:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>prisoners laugh at him. They think the journey has ruined

471
00:29:14.000 --> 00:29:16.279
<v Speaker 1>his sight and resist any attempts to be let out.

472
00:29:17.200 --> 00:29:19.119
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if anyone tried to drag them out, they

473
00:29:19.200 --> 00:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>might fight and even kill that person Socrates notes, if

474
00:29:22.680 --> 00:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they could lay hands on the escapee who returned, they

475
00:29:25.839 --> 00:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>kill him, a poignant reference to Socrates's own fate at

476
00:29:29.519 --> 00:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the hands of the ignorant. This allegory brilliantly compresses Plato's

477
00:29:34.480 --> 00:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>philosophical worldview. The cave represents the world of appearances, the

478
00:29:38.920 --> 00:29:42.359
<v Speaker 1>realm of ordinary perception and opinion. The shadows on the

479
00:29:42.400 --> 00:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>wall are the perceptions of sensory objects, which the unenlightened

480
00:29:45.440 --> 00:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>take as the most real things. The difficult descent out

481
00:29:48.200 --> 00:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of the cave symbolizes education, the philosopher's journey from ignorance

482
00:29:52.160 --> 00:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to knowledge. From allusion to reality the outside world, but

483
00:29:55.920 --> 00:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the sun is the realm of true reality, the world

484
00:29:58.279 --> 00:30:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of forms. The sun rep presents the form of the good,

485
00:30:01.599 --> 00:30:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate principle that illuminates all the others. In Plato's theory,

486
00:30:05.279 --> 00:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the good is the highest form that gives truth and

487
00:30:07.839 --> 00:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>being to the rest, just as the sun makes visible

488
00:30:10.759 --> 00:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>things exist and allows vision. The freed prisoner is the

489
00:30:14.440 --> 00:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>philosopher who, through reason and dialect, comes to grasp the

490
00:30:17.920 --> 00:30:21.559
<v Speaker 1>forms and attain knowledge. The return to the cave represents

491
00:30:21.599 --> 00:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the philosopher's role in society. Having seen the truth, he

492
00:30:25.000 --> 00:30:27.839
<v Speaker 1>has a duty to help enlighten others, even if they

493
00:30:27.880 --> 00:30:32.519
<v Speaker 1>are hostile or incredulous. Plato thereby explains why philosophers are

494
00:30:32.599 --> 00:30:36.599
<v Speaker 1>uniquely suited to rule. They have knowledge of the true realities,

495
00:30:36.960 --> 00:30:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the forms of justice, goodness, and so on, whereas the

496
00:30:40.400 --> 00:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>majority only have opinions based on shadows. However, as he

497
00:30:44.480 --> 00:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>acknowledges the difficulty people steeped in ignorance resist enlightenment, they're

498
00:30:49.319 --> 00:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>like us, the text says, most of us are prisoners

499
00:30:52.240 --> 00:30:56.519
<v Speaker 1>of our own limited perspective. The allegory thus carries not

500
00:30:56.640 --> 00:31:00.079
<v Speaker 1>only epistemological meaning the assent to knowledge, but also a

501
00:31:00.119 --> 00:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>moral and political message. It dramatizes the philosopher's compassion and

502
00:31:04.240 --> 00:31:07.799
<v Speaker 1>responsibility and the society's need for true wisdom, even if

503
00:31:07.799 --> 00:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't want it. From an academic perspective, the cave

504
00:31:12.559 --> 00:31:15.279
<v Speaker 1>is often interpreted as an answer to the question why

505
00:31:15.319 --> 00:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>study philosophy. It suggests that without philosophy, we are like

506
00:31:18.960 --> 00:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>prisioners' mistaking shadows for reality. In other words, without critical

507
00:31:23.480 --> 00:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking and the pursuit of truth, we live in ignorance.

508
00:31:27.599 --> 00:31:31.599
<v Speaker 1>The cave dweller's cognitive trap of ignorance is comfortable, and

509
00:31:31.640 --> 00:31:34.559
<v Speaker 1>they do not know anything beyond the shadows. As one

510
00:31:34.559 --> 00:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>analysis puts it, they even engage in trivial games like

511
00:31:38.200 --> 00:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>guessing which shadow comes next, analogous to how people in

512
00:31:41.279 --> 00:31:45.319
<v Speaker 1>our world might fixate on gossip, or appearances or conspiracies.

513
00:31:46.480 --> 00:31:50.279
<v Speaker 1>Plato's allegory dramatically illustrates the difference between appearance and reality,

514
00:31:50.599 --> 00:31:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a core Platonic distinction. The world of senses in the

515
00:31:54.400 --> 00:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>cave is a world of mere opinion. It's changing, incomplete,

516
00:31:57.960 --> 00:32:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and can deceive us. The world of forms outside the

517
00:32:01.359 --> 00:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>cave is permanent, fully real, and noble. Through reason. Education

518
00:32:06.559 --> 00:32:09.359
<v Speaker 1>is the painful, butt rewarding process of turning the soul

519
00:32:09.400 --> 00:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>from darkness toward light. A striking moment is when Plato

520
00:32:13.599 --> 00:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>notes how the freed prisoner returning is ridiculed or even

521
00:32:17.039 --> 00:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>killed by the cave dwellers who think he's crazy. This

522
00:32:20.559 --> 00:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is a thinly veiled reference to Socrates being executed by

523
00:32:23.440 --> 00:32:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the Athenians who did not understand him. It also shows

524
00:32:27.319 --> 00:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Plato's perhaps elitist viewpoint. The masses are deeply ignorant, though

525
00:32:32.000 --> 00:32:35.039
<v Speaker 1>not by their own fault entirely, and they might violently

526
00:32:35.079 --> 00:32:38.799
<v Speaker 1>resist very knowledge that would free them. This justifies in

527
00:32:38.880 --> 00:32:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Plato's mind why philosophers, reluctant, enlightened leaders should hold power

528
00:32:44.680 --> 00:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>even if unpopular. The philosopher kings will know what is

529
00:32:48.680 --> 00:32:51.559
<v Speaker 1>truly good for the city, having seen the sun the

530
00:32:51.559 --> 00:32:55.559
<v Speaker 1>good itself. After the cave allegory, the Republic goes on

531
00:32:55.640 --> 00:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the curriculum that would educate such philosopher rulers,

532
00:32:59.200 --> 00:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>including mathematics, dialect, and many years of gradual training. It

533
00:33:04.519 --> 00:33:08.119
<v Speaker 1>also features a famous critique of art and poetry. Plato

534
00:33:08.160 --> 00:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>controversially argues that poets and artists are imitators of mere appearances,

535
00:33:12.799 --> 00:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>shadows of shadows, and that their work can corrupt the

536
00:33:15.960 --> 00:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>soul by feeding emotions and misrepresenting reality. He even suggests

537
00:33:20.960 --> 00:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>banning most of homer and tragic poetry from the ideal city,

538
00:33:24.880 --> 00:33:27.519
<v Speaker 1>accept hymns to the gods and praises of good men.

539
00:33:28.559 --> 00:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the earliest examinations of art's moral

540
00:33:31.240 --> 00:33:37.359
<v Speaker 1>impact and has fueled debates about censorship and aesthetics for millennia. Additionally,

541
00:33:37.759 --> 00:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Final Book, Socrates relates the myth of Earth,

542
00:33:41.079 --> 00:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a story of a soldier who dies, visits the afterlife,

543
00:33:44.240 --> 00:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and returns to tell of how souls choose their next lives,

544
00:33:47.440 --> 00:33:50.519
<v Speaker 1>a kind of moral fable to encourage justice by showing

545
00:33:50.599 --> 00:33:53.680
<v Speaker 1>rewards and punishments after death. The myth of arr brings

546
00:33:53.720 --> 00:33:56.519
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue full circle by reinforcing that a just life

547
00:33:56.559 --> 00:34:00.319
<v Speaker 1>is rewarded in the long run, whereas injustice ultimately leads

548
00:34:00.359 --> 00:34:04.279
<v Speaker 1>to misery for the soul. In summary, the republic gives

549
00:34:04.319 --> 00:34:08.199
<v Speaker 1>us Plato's vision of a just society and a just soul. Justice,

550
00:34:08.239 --> 00:34:11.559
<v Speaker 1>Plato concludes, is when each part performs its proper role.

551
00:34:11.920 --> 00:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>In the city, each class does its own work. Rulers

552
00:34:14.519 --> 00:34:19.079
<v Speaker 1>rule with wisdom, soldiers uphold courage, produces exercise moderation by

553
00:34:19.119 --> 00:34:22.639
<v Speaker 1>obeying the rulers. And in the individual, each part of

554
00:34:22.679 --> 00:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the soul, reason, spirit, appetite fulfills its function with reason

555
00:34:26.760 --> 00:34:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and command. The just person is harmonious, with reason guiding

556
00:34:30.840 --> 00:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>spiritedness and desire toward good ends, a psychological mirroring of

557
00:34:35.280 --> 00:34:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the well ordered city. Such an individual will be truly

558
00:34:38.920 --> 00:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>happier than the tyrant who is ruled by lust or greed,

559
00:34:42.480 --> 00:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just as a healthy body is better off than a

560
00:34:44.480 --> 00:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>diseased one. Plato thus answers the initial question justice is

561
00:34:48.440 --> 00:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile for its own sake as it aligns one's soul

562
00:34:51.800 --> 00:34:55.760
<v Speaker 1>with the good. For a general audience, the Republic remains

563
00:34:55.760 --> 00:34:59.559
<v Speaker 1>compelling because of its mix of concrete social commentary. Some

564
00:34:59.599 --> 00:35:02.199
<v Speaker 1>see it in early communism or feminism in the mention

565
00:35:02.280 --> 00:35:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that women can be guardians too, and timeless abstract parables

566
00:35:05.880 --> 00:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like the Cave. Academically, it has generated enormous commentary on

567
00:35:10.440 --> 00:35:13.159
<v Speaker 1>its political feasibility, on the meaning of the forms and

568
00:35:13.159 --> 00:35:17.039
<v Speaker 1>the good, on whether Plato's proposal is toldtalitarian or enlightened,

569
00:35:17.239 --> 00:35:19.639
<v Speaker 1>on the role of education and censorship, and on the

570
00:35:19.719 --> 00:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>interpretative question of whether Plato himself endorsed every aspect or

571
00:35:23.880 --> 00:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>intended some irony, a debate known as the open question

572
00:35:27.719 --> 00:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of how literally to take the ideal City. What is

573
00:35:31.039 --> 00:35:35.280
<v Speaker 1>indisputable is that the Republic encapsulates Plato's conviction that philosophical

574
00:35:35.320 --> 00:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>wisdom and moral virtues are inseparable and are the only

575
00:35:38.920 --> 00:35:42.639
<v Speaker 1>solid foundation for a good human life in society. The

576
00:35:42.679 --> 00:35:45.599
<v Speaker 1>allegory of the Cave stands as enduring testimony to the

577
00:35:45.639 --> 00:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>transformative power of philosophy, from ignorance to knowledge, from darkness

578
00:35:50.000 --> 00:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to light, a journey each of us is invited to undertake.

579
00:35:55.800 --> 00:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Even as Plato developed profound metaphysics and political theory. He

580
00:35:59.320 --> 00:36:01.599
<v Speaker 1>remained deeply interested in human love in the way it

581
00:36:01.639 --> 00:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>connects us to higher things. Two Middle period dialogues, The

582
00:36:05.320 --> 00:36:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Symposium and the Fidris, are devoted to eros love or

583
00:36:08.719 --> 00:36:12.679
<v Speaker 1>passionate desire, and they offer a fascinating blend of psychology, metaphysics,

584
00:36:12.679 --> 00:36:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and even theology of love. These works present a more

585
00:36:15.840 --> 00:36:19.199
<v Speaker 1>poetic and mythic side of Plato's thought, complementing the rigorous

586
00:36:19.239 --> 00:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>logic of dialogues like Republic or Feto. In fact, the Syposium,

587
00:36:23.559 --> 00:36:26.679
<v Speaker 1>set as a banquet conversation, and the Fiedris, set as

588
00:36:26.719 --> 00:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a friendly chat outside the city walls, contains some of

589
00:36:29.440 --> 00:36:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Plato's most beautiful writing. They also introduce the concept of

590
00:36:33.320 --> 00:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>platonic love in its original sense, not just friends as

591
00:36:36.800 --> 00:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>pop culture uses the term, but rather a love that

592
00:36:39.400 --> 00:36:42.760
<v Speaker 1>transcends the physical and aims at the ideal beauty. The

593
00:36:42.800 --> 00:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Symposium takes place at a drinking party attended by Socrates

594
00:36:46.039 --> 00:36:50.119
<v Speaker 1>and a group of notable Athenians, including the playwright Aristophanes

595
00:36:50.440 --> 00:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and the handsome young tragedian Agathon. The guests agree to

596
00:36:53.840 --> 00:36:57.199
<v Speaker 1>each give a speech in praise of love Aeros. The

597
00:36:57.280 --> 00:37:01.559
<v Speaker 1>scenery allows Plato to showcase a variety of views on love. Aristophanes,

598
00:37:01.599 --> 00:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for instance, delivers a humorous yet poignant myth about humans

599
00:37:04.440 --> 00:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>originally being double creatures split in half by Zeus, so

600
00:37:07.960 --> 00:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that love is the search for the half, an origin

601
00:37:10.760 --> 00:37:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of the idea of soulmates. Others offer more conventional praise

602
00:37:14.840 --> 00:37:17.559
<v Speaker 1>of the god of love. The climax is Socrates's turn.

603
00:37:17.960 --> 00:37:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Instead of a speech of his own, he recounts the

604
00:37:20.239 --> 00:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>teachings of a wise woman, Diatoma of Mantinea. Whether she

605
00:37:23.960 --> 00:37:27.119
<v Speaker 1>is Plato's frictional invention or based on someone is unclear.

606
00:37:27.760 --> 00:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Diatoma gives a profound teaching on the nature and purpose

607
00:37:30.400 --> 00:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of love, introducing what later commentators call the latter of love.

608
00:37:34.679 --> 00:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>According to Diatoma via Socrates, all mortal creatures have an

609
00:37:38.519 --> 00:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>impulse to achieve immortality. For animals and humans, one route

610
00:37:43.400 --> 00:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to immortality is biological procreation, having children to carry on

611
00:37:47.719 --> 00:37:50.519
<v Speaker 1>one's genes or name, But there is a higher kind

612
00:37:50.519 --> 00:37:54.119
<v Speaker 1>of offspring for humans, the birth of ideas, virtue, and

613
00:37:54.199 --> 00:37:57.519
<v Speaker 1>creations of the soul, such as art or legislation that

614
00:37:57.599 --> 00:38:02.039
<v Speaker 1>confer lasting fame. The desire for immortality through the presence

615
00:38:02.079 --> 00:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>of good and beautiful Diatoma describes how a young person

616
00:38:06.280 --> 00:38:09.079
<v Speaker 1>should be guided by love for lower to higher forms

617
00:38:09.119 --> 00:38:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of beauty in a series of steps. This is the latter.

618
00:38:12.960 --> 00:38:15.679
<v Speaker 1>At first, one loves the beauty of a particular body.

619
00:38:16.239 --> 00:38:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Then one realizes that many bodies have similar beauty, so

620
00:38:19.280 --> 00:38:23.079
<v Speaker 1>one appreciates beauty in all bodies. Next, one comes to

621
00:38:23.199 --> 00:38:25.559
<v Speaker 1>esteem the beauty of the soul more than the body,

622
00:38:25.880 --> 00:38:29.199
<v Speaker 1>loving those who are beautiful in character. From there one

623
00:38:29.199 --> 00:38:32.760
<v Speaker 1>assends to love beautiful activities and laws, seeing beauty and

624
00:38:32.800 --> 00:38:38.559
<v Speaker 1>customs and institutions than to the beauty of knowledge and ideas. Finally,

625
00:38:38.599 --> 00:38:41.320
<v Speaker 1>if one is guided correctly, one reaches a vision of

626
00:38:41.320 --> 00:38:46.119
<v Speaker 1>beauty itself, an eternal, unchanging, pure beauty, not concrete or physical,

627
00:38:46.400 --> 00:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>but the very form of beauty. In the Otuma's famous words,

628
00:38:51.239 --> 00:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>at the pinnacle of the ascent, the lover suddenly perceives

629
00:38:54.840 --> 00:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>something wonderfully beautiful in its nature, the form of beauty itself,

630
00:38:59.679 --> 00:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>each ternal, not growing or decaying. The lover realizes that

631
00:39:04.000 --> 00:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>all particular beautiful things partake of this form of beauty.

632
00:39:07.559 --> 00:39:10.519
<v Speaker 1>Platonic love is thus a kind of spiritual arrows that

633
00:39:10.559 --> 00:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>begins with physical attraction but is ultimately aimed at the

634
00:39:13.480 --> 00:39:16.119
<v Speaker 1>form of beauty and the birth of true virtue and

635
00:39:16.159 --> 00:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>wisdom in the soul. As the Optimus says, if every

636
00:39:20.280 --> 00:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>one gazes on the form of beauty itself, it will

637
00:39:22.760 --> 00:39:25.639
<v Speaker 1>awaken a marvelous love, and one will want to give

638
00:39:25.679 --> 00:39:28.639
<v Speaker 1>birth not to fleshly children, but to true virtue and

639
00:39:28.639 --> 00:39:32.679
<v Speaker 1>become dear to the gods. In short, love is portrayed

640
00:39:32.719 --> 00:39:35.679
<v Speaker 1>as a ladder of assent to the divine, turning earthly

641
00:39:35.719 --> 00:39:40.239
<v Speaker 1>desire into a path toward the eternal. The Symposium thus

642
00:39:40.280 --> 00:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>presents a philosophy of love where eros is a driving

643
00:39:43.000 --> 00:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>force that can be sublimated from physical desire to a

644
00:39:46.360 --> 00:39:49.639
<v Speaker 1>love of the eternal and the good. It's a deeply

645
00:39:49.679 --> 00:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>optimistic view of love's potential. Love is not just a

646
00:39:52.960 --> 00:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>feeling or appetite, but a cosmic force that propels us

647
00:39:55.840 --> 00:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>towards wisdom and immortality. Symbolically speaking, it's also where noting

648
00:40:00.480 --> 00:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that in the Symposium, Socrates credits a woman, Diatema, as

649
00:40:04.320 --> 00:40:06.840
<v Speaker 1>his teacher in these matters, which is unique in Plato

650
00:40:07.159 --> 00:40:09.599
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps a nod to the idea that wisdom can

651
00:40:09.639 --> 00:40:13.519
<v Speaker 1>come from unexpected sources. The dramatic ending of Symposium is

652
00:40:13.519 --> 00:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>also memorable. Alquibad is a brilliant but drunken statesman crisis

653
00:40:17.440 --> 00:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the party and delivers the speech praising and teasing Socrates himself,

654
00:40:21.679 --> 00:40:24.639
<v Speaker 1>likening Socrates to a salanous figure, ugly on the outside

655
00:40:24.639 --> 00:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but full of godlike images within, and confessing his unrequitive

656
00:40:28.360 --> 00:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>love for Socrates. This adds a poignant human touch, showing

657
00:40:32.880 --> 00:40:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Socrates as an object of erros, but one who sublimates it,

658
00:40:36.639 --> 00:40:41.559
<v Speaker 1>never succumbing to mere physicality. Platonic love in modern parlance

659
00:40:41.639 --> 00:40:44.800
<v Speaker 1>meaning non sexual affection has its root in this idea.

660
00:40:45.239 --> 00:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Socrates and Alcibaides have a form of love that is

661
00:40:47.880 --> 00:40:52.119
<v Speaker 1>not consummated physically, which Socrates claims is because true love

662
00:40:52.199 --> 00:40:56.760
<v Speaker 1>aims higher than the body. De Fiedris, another dialogue centered

663
00:40:56.800 --> 00:41:00.280
<v Speaker 1>on love and beauty, complements symposium, but has a different form.

664
00:41:00.599 --> 00:41:03.159
<v Speaker 1>It features only Socrates in Fidris, a young and Myra

665
00:41:03.400 --> 00:41:06.239
<v Speaker 1>talking outside the city, and it contains two speeches by

666
00:41:06.280 --> 00:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Socrates on love, one critical one celibratory, as well as

667
00:41:10.280 --> 00:41:14.079
<v Speaker 1>discussions on rhetoric and writing. The most famous part of

668
00:41:14.119 --> 00:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Fidris is the chariot allegory of the soul. Socrates describes

669
00:41:17.800 --> 00:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the soul as a charioteer driving two horses. One horse

670
00:41:20.840 --> 00:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is noble and good, representing the spirited part of the

671
00:41:23.480 --> 00:41:26.079
<v Speaker 1>soul that can be guided by reason. The other is

672
00:41:26.119 --> 00:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>bad and unruly, representing the appetite part base desires. The

673
00:41:30.920 --> 00:41:34.800
<v Speaker 1>charioteer is reason. In the mythic vision, the souls of

674
00:41:34.840 --> 00:41:38.079
<v Speaker 1>the gods have perfect horses and charioteers, and dwell always

675
00:41:38.079 --> 00:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in the realm above the heavens, where they behold the forms,

676
00:41:40.960 --> 00:41:44.519
<v Speaker 1>and especially the form of beauty. Human souls follow in

677
00:41:44.519 --> 00:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the train of the gods, riding up to glimpse the forms,

678
00:41:47.199 --> 00:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but the bad horse makes it difficult. In this wild metaphor,

679
00:41:51.079 --> 00:41:53.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the soul gets a vision of true beauty, other

680
00:41:53.800 --> 00:41:56.880
<v Speaker 1>times it struggles. Eventually, souls fall back to Earth and

681
00:41:57.000 --> 00:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>are incarnated into bodies, and their experience of having seen

682
00:42:00.480 --> 00:42:04.159
<v Speaker 1>the forms determines what kind of person they become. Philosophers

683
00:42:04.159 --> 00:42:07.199
<v Speaker 1>saw more, so they are born with greater insight, others

684
00:42:07.239 --> 00:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>so or less, and became people attached to more base pursuits.

685
00:42:11.280 --> 00:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Socrates then links this to love. When a person here

686
00:42:14.360 --> 00:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>on earth sees someone with physical beauty, it triggers a

687
00:42:16.960 --> 00:42:20.199
<v Speaker 1>recollection of the true beauty their soul once saw the

688
00:42:20.280 --> 00:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>soul's wings start to sprout in yearning for that higher reality.

689
00:42:24.079 --> 00:42:27.039
<v Speaker 1>The good horse spirit is restrained, but the bad horse

690
00:42:27.079 --> 00:42:31.519
<v Speaker 1>passion lunges, leading to inner conflict. If the charioteer reason

691
00:42:31.559 --> 00:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>could guide the whole soul to honor and cherish to

692
00:42:34.000 --> 00:42:37.760
<v Speaker 1>beauty rightly, the lovers will practice philosophical self control and

693
00:42:37.880 --> 00:42:42.119
<v Speaker 1>sublimate their passion into virtue. If they cannot, they may

694
00:42:42.159 --> 00:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>give into desire. But even a relationship that is chase

695
00:42:45.239 --> 00:42:48.800
<v Speaker 1>can be profoundly loving. Socrates implies the highest form of

696
00:42:48.800 --> 00:42:51.559
<v Speaker 1>earthly love is a kind of platonic friendship, where two

697
00:42:51.639 --> 00:42:54.559
<v Speaker 1>souls inspire each other toward the form of beauty and

698
00:42:54.599 --> 00:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the good, rather than merely satiating physical lust. This aligns

699
00:42:58.960 --> 00:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>with the symposiums latter, but adds the imagery of the

700
00:43:01.280 --> 00:43:05.199
<v Speaker 1>soul's ascent and full Plato's idea here is that love

701
00:43:05.320 --> 00:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is a form of divine madness, one of our four

702
00:43:07.920 --> 00:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>kinds of divinely inspired madness. He mentions, the others being prophetic, ritual,

703
00:43:12.400 --> 00:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and poetic madness. Love's madness is a gets from the

704
00:43:15.920 --> 00:43:18.519
<v Speaker 1>gods because it can propel the soul back toward its

705
00:43:18.519 --> 00:43:22.960
<v Speaker 1>heavenly origin. The Fegis also has an interesting critique of writing.

706
00:43:23.519 --> 00:43:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Socrates famously recounts the myth of the Egyptian god Toath

707
00:43:26.840 --> 00:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>inventing writing, and King Thamas criticizing it because it will

708
00:43:29.880 --> 00:43:33.199
<v Speaker 1>make people rely on written words rather than their own

709
00:43:33.199 --> 00:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>memory and understanding. This often puzzles readers, since we only

710
00:43:37.519 --> 00:43:40.920
<v Speaker 1>know Socrates through Plato's writing. Is Plato biting the hand

711
00:43:40.920 --> 00:43:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that feeds him. The deeper point Plato makes is that

712
00:43:43.480 --> 00:43:46.559
<v Speaker 1>writing is static and can't answer questions or defend itself.

713
00:43:47.039 --> 00:43:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Live dialect is superior, but ironically, Plato's own dialogues try

714
00:43:51.800 --> 00:43:54.039
<v Speaker 1>to overcome this by writing in a way that stimulates

715
00:43:54.039 --> 00:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>the reader's dialectical engagement, as if a written text could

716
00:43:57.239 --> 00:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>be as alive as conversation. From Symposium and Fedris, the

717
00:44:01.960 --> 00:44:05.519
<v Speaker 1>key philosophical takeaway is Plato's theory of love. Love is

718
00:44:05.519 --> 00:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally a desire for eternal beauty and goodness, and erotic

719
00:44:09.039 --> 00:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>love can be an elevating force if guided by philosophy.

720
00:44:12.639 --> 00:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The notion of platonic love, a love that transcends the

721
00:44:15.480 --> 00:44:18.159
<v Speaker 1>physical and bond soul together in pursuit of higher things,

722
00:44:18.400 --> 00:44:21.760
<v Speaker 1>comes straight from these dialogues. They also contribute to Plato's

723
00:44:21.800 --> 00:44:25.199
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the soul. The soul is immortal, again affirmed

724
00:44:25.199 --> 00:44:27.840
<v Speaker 1>here as only as an immortal soul could pre exist

725
00:44:27.920 --> 00:44:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and see the forms and has parts that can conflict.

726
00:44:31.360 --> 00:44:34.760
<v Speaker 1>The chariot allegory vividly conveys the tension within human nature,

727
00:44:35.039 --> 00:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a theme that resonates with anyone who has felt reason

728
00:44:37.639 --> 00:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and passion at odds. Academically, these dialogues have been analyzed

729
00:44:41.719 --> 00:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>for their psychology of love, their treatment of gender, and

730
00:44:44.440 --> 00:44:48.519
<v Speaker 1>their poetic style. The Symposium, especially with its layered framing,

731
00:44:48.760 --> 00:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>invites questions about history versus myth. But historically these works

732
00:44:52.719 --> 00:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>have inspired views of love from early Christian thinkers who

733
00:44:55.559 --> 00:44:58.039
<v Speaker 1>try to merge platonic love with spiritual love of God,

734
00:44:58.320 --> 00:45:02.039
<v Speaker 1>to Renaissance philosophers and even more modern concepts of romance

735
00:45:02.039 --> 00:45:06.079
<v Speaker 1>that value the spiritual connection over the physical. In some

736
00:45:06.559 --> 00:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Plato sees Eros as a powerful intermediary between the human

737
00:45:10.039 --> 00:45:14.039
<v Speaker 1>and the divine. In Symposium, Diatoma calls Eros a great

738
00:45:14.119 --> 00:45:17.159
<v Speaker 1>damon spirit that is the child of poverty and resource,

739
00:45:17.440 --> 00:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>always needy but clever at seeking fulfillment. The image captures

740
00:45:21.400 --> 00:45:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the human condition. We are not God's, but through love

741
00:45:24.559 --> 00:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we reach out for something more enduring than ourselves. Love

742
00:45:28.079 --> 00:45:32.519
<v Speaker 1>educates us, in the best case, turning desire into virtue. Thus,

743
00:45:32.599 --> 00:45:35.440
<v Speaker 1>alongside reason, love is a central pair to as sending

744
00:45:35.440 --> 00:45:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the latter of knowledge in Plato's philosophy. Plato's late dialogues

745
00:45:40.679 --> 00:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>reflect an aging philosopher turning to review and refine his

746
00:45:43.960 --> 00:45:47.639
<v Speaker 1>earlier ideas, as well to venture into new territory such

747
00:45:47.679 --> 00:45:51.679
<v Speaker 1>as formal logic, science, and law. These works are generally

748
00:45:51.679 --> 00:45:54.320
<v Speaker 1>more difficult and were likely written in the last decade

749
00:45:54.320 --> 00:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of Plato's life. While not all can be discussed in

750
00:45:57.519 --> 00:46:04.079
<v Speaker 1>equal detail, we can highlight a few, the Parmenides, Theotitis, Sophis, Statesman, Timaeus,

751
00:46:04.079 --> 00:46:07.559
<v Speaker 1>and Laws. In them, Plato shows a willingness to critique

752
00:46:07.599 --> 00:46:11.119
<v Speaker 1>his own doctrines, especially the theory of forms, and to address

753
00:46:11.159 --> 00:46:16.679
<v Speaker 1>practical and scientific questions more directly. In Parmenides, Plato daringly

754
00:46:16.800 --> 00:46:19.800
<v Speaker 1>casts his young hero Socrates in a conversation with the

755
00:46:19.880 --> 00:46:24.400
<v Speaker 1>venerable eleatic philosopher of Parmenides. The dialogue reads almost like

756
00:46:24.400 --> 00:46:28.599
<v Speaker 1>Plato debating himself. Parmenides examined Socrates's theory that there are

757
00:46:28.679 --> 00:46:32.440
<v Speaker 1>forms one over many, and systematically hits it with tough objections.

758
00:46:33.159 --> 00:46:36.280
<v Speaker 1>For instance, he raises what became known as the third

759
00:46:36.360 --> 00:46:40.400
<v Speaker 1>man argument against the form of largeness. If large things

760
00:46:40.440 --> 00:46:43.159
<v Speaker 1>are large by sharing in the form of large, then

761
00:46:43.280 --> 00:46:46.599
<v Speaker 1>mustn't it deposit another form to account for the largeness

762
00:46:46.599 --> 00:46:49.679
<v Speaker 1>that the form of large and particularly large things share,

763
00:46:50.000 --> 00:46:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and so on ad infinitum. He also questions how forms

764
00:46:54.559 --> 00:46:58.079
<v Speaker 1>which are changeless can relate to changing things, and how

765
00:46:58.079 --> 00:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we can know forms at all if they are in

766
00:46:59.840 --> 00:47:03.079
<v Speaker 1>a separate realm. Does the human mind have a form

767
00:47:03.159 --> 00:47:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of mind that touches the others? These puzzles are raised

768
00:47:06.480 --> 00:47:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and not overly answered by Plato. Indeed, Parmenides ends without

769
00:47:10.440 --> 00:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>resolution after Parmenides puts Socrates to a rigorous exercise and

770
00:47:14.519 --> 00:47:18.440
<v Speaker 1>dialectic considering all consequences of assuming a one or not one.

771
00:47:19.000 --> 00:47:21.079
<v Speaker 1>The effect of this dialogue is to show that Plato

772
00:47:21.159 --> 00:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>was aware of potential logical problems with his own Middle

773
00:47:24.000 --> 00:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Period theories. Scholars still debate whether Plato intended specific solutions

774
00:47:28.440 --> 00:47:31.639
<v Speaker 1>or was possibly indicating a shift in his thinking. Regardless,

775
00:47:31.719 --> 00:47:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Parmenides is a treasure troll for understanding the challenges of

776
00:47:34.599 --> 00:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a two world metaphysics and has spurred countless commentaries on

777
00:47:38.000 --> 00:47:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the forms. The Theotitis is another gem of the late

778
00:47:42.280 --> 00:47:46.760
<v Speaker 1>period focus on epistemology the theory of knowledge. Socrates meets

779
00:47:46.760 --> 00:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>young Theotitis, who would become a noble mathematician, and asks

780
00:47:50.880 --> 00:47:56.119
<v Speaker 1>what is knowledge? The dialogue examines three answers. Knowledge is perception,

781
00:47:56.960 --> 00:48:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Knowledge is true belief, knowledge is true belieff with an

782
00:48:00.599 --> 00:48:05.199
<v Speaker 1>account logos, essentially anticipating the idea of justified true belief.

783
00:48:06.000 --> 00:48:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Each of these gets refuted or at least found inadequate.

784
00:48:09.599 --> 00:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>If knowledge was simply perception, then truth would be entirely subjective.

785
00:48:13.760 --> 00:48:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Each person's perception is truth for them, which Socrates argues

786
00:48:17.840 --> 00:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is self defeating, because if all opinions are true, then

787
00:48:20.920 --> 00:48:23.599
<v Speaker 1>the opinion that not all opinions are true must also

788
00:48:23.639 --> 00:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be true, a contradiction if knowledge is true belief. Socrates

789
00:48:28.039 --> 00:48:30.079
<v Speaker 1>points out that one can have true belief by luck

790
00:48:30.199 --> 00:48:33.559
<v Speaker 1>or persuasion without actually knowing, Like a juror convinced by

791
00:48:33.679 --> 00:48:36.559
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric might have a true belief about what happened, but

792
00:48:36.599 --> 00:48:39.679
<v Speaker 1>we hesitate to say he knows, the addition of an

793
00:48:39.679 --> 00:48:43.559
<v Speaker 1>account or explanation seems promising. The addition of an account

794
00:48:43.679 --> 00:48:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or explanation seems promising knowledge has justified true belief, but

795
00:48:48.119 --> 00:48:51.199
<v Speaker 1>problems arise in defining what counts as an adequate account.

796
00:48:51.679 --> 00:48:54.519
<v Speaker 1>The dialogue explores an image of trying to distinguish pieces

797
00:48:54.559 --> 00:48:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of wind drone in one's mind. In the end, Theotitis

798
00:48:58.679 --> 00:49:02.800
<v Speaker 1>concludes in Apoia without a final definition of knowledge. Yet

799
00:49:02.840 --> 00:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an enormously rich dialogue that maps out the field

800
00:49:05.480 --> 00:49:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of epistemology for future generations. Notably, Plato here does not

801
00:49:10.719 --> 00:49:14.719
<v Speaker 1>invoke forms of the recollection doctrine overtly. The dialogue stays

802
00:49:14.760 --> 00:49:17.360
<v Speaker 1>at the level of every day in logical analysis, which

803
00:49:17.360 --> 00:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>some interpret as Plato stepping back from his earliest certainty

804
00:49:20.039 --> 00:49:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about how we know things. Perhaps he's acknowledging the complexity

805
00:49:23.840 --> 00:49:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of defining knowledge and the role of perception and true

806
00:49:26.360 --> 00:49:30.519
<v Speaker 1>belief within it. For the modern reader, Theotetis is fascinating

807
00:49:30.599 --> 00:49:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as an ancient precursor to debates about empiricism, verst rationalism,

808
00:49:34.639 --> 00:49:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and the nature of justification. Sophists and statesmen, sometimes called politicus,

809
00:49:39.440 --> 00:49:42.159
<v Speaker 1>are a pair of dialogues where an iliatic stranger takes

810
00:49:42.199 --> 00:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the lead. Socrates is mostly silent, present only as a

811
00:49:45.800 --> 00:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>character who listens in sophist. The Stranger and young Theotetis

812
00:49:50.039 --> 00:49:53.159
<v Speaker 1>try to define a sophist. This leads them into a

813
00:49:53.239 --> 00:49:57.519
<v Speaker 1>rather technical examination of dialectical method and a venture into ontology.

814
00:49:57.760 --> 00:50:01.679
<v Speaker 1>The philosophy of being and not being, Plato wrestles with

815
00:50:01.719 --> 00:50:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the concept of non being to explain how false statements

816
00:50:04.280 --> 00:50:08.320
<v Speaker 1>are possible. The stranger introduces the theory that that which

817
00:50:08.360 --> 00:50:12.719
<v Speaker 1>is not in a sense is namely as difference. For example,

818
00:50:12.800 --> 00:50:15.880
<v Speaker 1>not being does not mean total nothingness, but being other

819
00:50:15.960 --> 00:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>than something. Thus, falsehood can be explained as saying something

820
00:50:19.360 --> 00:50:22.559
<v Speaker 1>is in a way that it is not, like predicating

821
00:50:22.599 --> 00:50:25.159
<v Speaker 1>something that is different from the truth. This might sound

822
00:50:25.159 --> 00:50:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of truth, but it's Plato's response to parmenites strict idea

823
00:50:28.440 --> 00:50:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that one cannot speak or think of what is not,

824
00:50:31.679 --> 00:50:35.960
<v Speaker 1>since doing so we granted existence. Plato basically invents a

825
00:50:36.039 --> 00:50:40.119
<v Speaker 1>rudimentary theory of categories or forms of predication here, distinguishing

826
00:50:40.159 --> 00:50:45.280
<v Speaker 1>between being, saneness, difference, motion, rest the greatest kinds. It's

827
00:50:45.280 --> 00:50:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a sign of his late interest in logic and language.

828
00:50:48.199 --> 00:50:51.440
<v Speaker 1>The statesman continues the method of definition, this time trying

829
00:50:51.480 --> 00:50:54.199
<v Speaker 1>to pin down what a true statesman is, using a

830
00:50:54.280 --> 00:50:57.920
<v Speaker 1>lengthly analogy of weaving. The Statesman weaves together the fabric

831
00:50:57.960 --> 00:51:02.119
<v Speaker 1>of society, balance and courage anderation in citizens. While not

832
00:51:02.320 --> 00:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>is widely read today, Statesman contains reflection on laws and

833
00:51:05.760 --> 00:51:10.960
<v Speaker 1>governance that prefigure Law's dialogue. The Timaeus is unique in

834
00:51:10.960 --> 00:51:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Plato's corpus. It is his foray into cosmology and natural philosophy,

835
00:51:15.920 --> 00:51:18.760
<v Speaker 1>whereas most dialogues are about ethics or knowledge or love.

836
00:51:19.199 --> 00:51:22.039
<v Speaker 1>Timaeus gives a grand account of the creation of the universe.

837
00:51:22.880 --> 00:51:25.119
<v Speaker 1>It is set as a kind of sequel to Republic.

838
00:51:25.440 --> 00:51:28.920
<v Speaker 1>At one point, Socrates says, yesterday we described the ideal city.

839
00:51:29.239 --> 00:51:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Now let's hear about the universe, and features a single

840
00:51:31.960 --> 00:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>long speech by Timaeus of Locri, a Pythagorean philosopher. In

841
00:51:36.519 --> 00:51:40.679
<v Speaker 1>this speech, Plato, through Timaeus describes how a divine demiurge

842
00:51:40.800 --> 00:51:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Cristman God fashioned the cosmos as a living creature with

843
00:51:44.360 --> 00:51:48.199
<v Speaker 1>a soul by imposing mathematical order on chaotic, pre existing matter.

844
00:51:49.199 --> 00:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>The Demiurge is supremely good and wanted everything to be

845
00:51:52.159 --> 00:51:56.199
<v Speaker 1>as good as possible. Using the eternal forms as blueprints,

846
00:51:56.320 --> 00:51:59.519
<v Speaker 1>he brings order out of disorder. For example, he creates

847
00:51:59.519 --> 00:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the world's by mixing elements of saneness, difference, and being,

848
00:52:03.239 --> 00:52:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and he arranges the stars, suns, and planets to create time,

849
00:52:06.920 --> 00:52:09.519
<v Speaker 1>for time is the moving image of eternity. In Plato's

850
00:52:09.519 --> 00:52:13.840
<v Speaker 1>famous phrase, the four classical elements earth, air, fire, water

851
00:52:14.079 --> 00:52:17.639
<v Speaker 1>are explained in terms of regular geometric solids, a striking

852
00:52:17.679 --> 00:52:21.239
<v Speaker 1>proto scientific idea that matter is composed of tiny triangles

853
00:52:21.239 --> 00:52:25.559
<v Speaker 1>forming the platonic solids, cubes, tetrahedron, and so on, each

854
00:52:25.599 --> 00:52:29.320
<v Speaker 1>corresponding to an element. Timaeus even includes an account of

855
00:52:29.400 --> 00:52:32.760
<v Speaker 1>human anatomy and physiology, attributing various parts of the body

856
00:52:32.800 --> 00:52:35.519
<v Speaker 1>to the God's christmanship, like the liver as an organ

857
00:52:35.559 --> 00:52:38.519
<v Speaker 1>of divination, the marrow as seed of generation, and so on.

858
00:52:39.079 --> 00:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Is a bizarre but fascinating mix of scientific reasoning some

859
00:52:42.440 --> 00:52:47.400
<v Speaker 1>see hints of atomism and embryology and mythic imagination. Importantly,

860
00:52:47.559 --> 00:52:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Plato makes clear that this cosmology is a likely story,

861
00:52:50.880 --> 00:52:53.519
<v Speaker 1>meaning it is not to be taken as absolute revelation,

862
00:52:53.840 --> 00:52:57.480
<v Speaker 1>but as a plausible account given our limited understanding. He

863
00:52:57.559 --> 00:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>acknowledges that knowledge of the physical world can only be conjectural,

864
00:53:01.199 --> 00:53:05.559
<v Speaker 1>since only the forms often certainty. Nonetheless, the Timeeus was

865
00:53:05.639 --> 00:53:09.239
<v Speaker 1>hugely influential, especially in antiquity in the Middle Ages. As

866
00:53:09.280 --> 00:53:12.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the few detailed creation accounts in Greek philosophy.

867
00:53:12.440 --> 00:53:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It even influenced early Christian thinkers for its idea of

868
00:53:15.320 --> 00:53:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a divine creator imposing order. In the context of Plato's ideas,

869
00:53:19.519 --> 00:53:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Timaeus reinforces the certainty of the forms and the good.

870
00:53:23.039 --> 00:53:25.719
<v Speaker 1>The demiurge uses the form of the good as a model,

871
00:53:26.400 --> 00:53:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and it introduces the notion of necessity verse reason. The

872
00:53:29.719 --> 00:53:32.239
<v Speaker 1>world is a product of the rational plan of the demiurge,

873
00:53:32.280 --> 00:53:36.519
<v Speaker 1>but also the necessary laws of the material realm. In

874
00:53:36.559 --> 00:53:40.159
<v Speaker 1>the context of Plato's ideas, Thimeeus reinforces the centrality of

875
00:53:40.159 --> 00:53:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the forms and the good. The demiurg uses the form

876
00:53:42.639 --> 00:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the good as a model, and it introduces the

877
00:53:45.039 --> 00:53:48.039
<v Speaker 1>notion of necessity verse reason. The world is a product

878
00:53:48.079 --> 00:53:50.599
<v Speaker 1>of the rational plan of the demiurge, but also the

879
00:53:50.639 --> 00:53:55.360
<v Speaker 1>necessary laws of the material realm. The demiurge persuades necessity

880
00:53:55.360 --> 00:53:59.039
<v Speaker 1>to cooperate via shapes and numbers, indicating that the cosmos

881
00:53:59.119 --> 00:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is built by geomet and mathematical principles. The demiurge persuades

882
00:54:03.519 --> 00:54:07.159
<v Speaker 1>necessity to cooperate via shapes and numbers, indicating that the

883
00:54:07.199 --> 00:54:10.880
<v Speaker 1>cosmos is built by geometric and mathematical principles. This links

884
00:54:10.880 --> 00:54:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Pythagorean influence on Plato, the belief that mathematical

885
00:54:14.440 --> 00:54:19.880
<v Speaker 1>order underlies reality. Finally, Plato's Laws is his last and

886
00:54:19.960 --> 00:54:22.880
<v Speaker 1>longest work, often seen as a more practical follow up

887
00:54:22.880 --> 00:54:27.159
<v Speaker 1>to Republic. In Laws, Plato abandons the character of Socrates

888
00:54:27.320 --> 00:54:31.159
<v Speaker 1>entirely instead. The dialogue is a conversation between an unnamed

889
00:54:31.199 --> 00:54:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Athenian stranger who likely voices Plato's own late views, and

890
00:54:35.039 --> 00:54:37.639
<v Speaker 1>two old men, a Spartan and a Cretan. As they

891
00:54:37.679 --> 00:54:40.119
<v Speaker 1>take a long hike on crete, they discuss how to

892
00:54:40.119 --> 00:54:42.480
<v Speaker 1>found a new colony in what it laws should be.

893
00:54:43.159 --> 00:54:46.960
<v Speaker 1>The tone is quite different from Republic, more legalistic and detailed.

894
00:54:47.400 --> 00:54:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Plato seemingly accepts the actual cities will never be run

895
00:54:50.360 --> 00:54:53.880
<v Speaker 1>by philosopher kings, so Laws outlines the second best state,

896
00:54:54.480 --> 00:54:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one governed by laws and a mixed constitution. The Athenian

897
00:54:58.480 --> 00:55:01.400
<v Speaker 1>stranger still aims to shape of versvirtuous citizenry, but through

898
00:55:01.480 --> 00:55:05.360
<v Speaker 1>rigid laws and social institutions rather than through philosopher rulers.

899
00:55:06.239 --> 00:55:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Laws covers everything from marriage, education and drinking parties to

900
00:55:09.960 --> 00:55:14.599
<v Speaker 1>criminal law, economic regulation, and religious rights. It's almost a

901
00:55:14.679 --> 00:55:18.280
<v Speaker 1>legal code in dialogue form, complete with the reasoning behind

902
00:55:18.320 --> 00:55:21.119
<v Speaker 1>each ordinance given in the form of preambles to laws.

903
00:55:22.159 --> 00:55:24.719
<v Speaker 1>In fact. One notable idea is that every law should

904
00:55:24.719 --> 00:55:27.920
<v Speaker 1>be preceded by a persuasive prelude explaining why the law

905
00:55:28.039 --> 00:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is just and good. Plato thus acknowledges the educative value

906
00:55:32.400 --> 00:55:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of written law by giving citizens rational explanations. The laws

907
00:55:36.360 --> 00:55:40.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves teach virtue, not just coerce behavior. This is a

908
00:55:40.880 --> 00:55:44.039
<v Speaker 1>very platonic touch. Even in laying down rules, he wants

909
00:55:44.039 --> 00:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to reason and the soul's understanding. Compared to Republic,

910
00:55:47.639 --> 00:55:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the government described in Laws is more conservative and less idealistic.

911
00:55:51.719 --> 00:55:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Why this shift, perhaps Plato in old age had become

912
00:55:55.400 --> 00:55:58.599
<v Speaker 1>more cautious after seeing the failure of the Syracuse experiments

913
00:55:58.679 --> 00:56:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and the general resistance to philosopher kings. In Laws, he

914
00:56:02.920 --> 00:56:06.639
<v Speaker 1>explicitly plans a city cold Magnesia, where the rulers are

915
00:56:06.679 --> 00:56:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not full fledged philosophers. They don't know the forms, but

916
00:56:09.840 --> 00:56:12.480
<v Speaker 1>are guided by the law in a sort of civic religion.

917
00:56:13.920 --> 00:56:17.039
<v Speaker 1>There is a nocturnal counsel of senior officials who study

918
00:56:17.039 --> 00:56:19.840
<v Speaker 1>philosophy in theology by night to keep the city on

919
00:56:19.960 --> 00:56:25.000
<v Speaker 1>course an interesting compromise. Laws is less frequently read than Republic,

920
00:56:25.360 --> 00:56:28.400
<v Speaker 1>partly because its dry detail can be tedious, but it

921
00:56:28.440 --> 00:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is invaluable for understanding Plato's late political thought. It shows

922
00:56:31.960 --> 00:56:35.079
<v Speaker 1>him trying to apply his principles to a real worldish scenario.

923
00:56:35.760 --> 00:56:39.079
<v Speaker 1>The tone is stern. For instance, Laws advocates for state

924
00:56:39.079 --> 00:56:42.719
<v Speaker 1>control of education, discourages innovation in music and arts to

925
00:56:42.800 --> 00:56:47.119
<v Speaker 1>avoid moral decay, and imposes fairly harsh penalties for various crimes.

926
00:56:48.360 --> 00:56:50.239
<v Speaker 1>It also stands out for being one of the earliest

927
00:56:50.280 --> 00:56:53.880
<v Speaker 1>treaties to claim the law should rule rather than any individual.

928
00:56:54.519 --> 00:56:57.880
<v Speaker 1>The rule of law concept something even Republic's philosopher king

929
00:56:57.920 --> 00:57:01.480
<v Speaker 1>regime didn't emphasize, because the king's knowledge was the law.

930
00:57:01.519 --> 00:57:05.280
<v Speaker 1>There In Laws, however, Plato writes, if law is the

931
00:57:05.320 --> 00:57:08.239
<v Speaker 1>master of the government and the government is its slave,

932
00:57:08.639 --> 00:57:12.400
<v Speaker 1>then the situation is safe and good, implying that no person,

933
00:57:12.519 --> 00:57:15.960
<v Speaker 1>unless divine, can be trusted with absolute power. This is

934
00:57:16.000 --> 00:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a notable development. One might ask, is Laws of repudiation

935
00:57:19.559 --> 00:57:22.599
<v Speaker 1>of Republic. Plato seems to say that his ideal in

936
00:57:22.679 --> 00:57:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Republic was too high for ordinary humans. Laws is a

937
00:57:26.199 --> 00:57:30.559
<v Speaker 1>pragmatic second best. Indeed, the Athenian stranger in Laws explicitly

938
00:57:30.599 --> 00:57:33.519
<v Speaker 1>calls it second after the ideal of a truly wise ruler.

939
00:57:34.360 --> 00:57:36.760
<v Speaker 1>A revealing line is when the Athenian says that in

940
00:57:36.800 --> 00:57:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the ideal case, where people are perfectly virtuous, no laws

941
00:57:40.679 --> 00:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>are needed, but since we don't have divine rulers, we

942
00:57:43.440 --> 00:57:46.159
<v Speaker 1>must tie them down with laws like puppets guided by

943
00:57:46.159 --> 00:57:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a divine code. The dialogue ends somewhat abruptly with a

944
00:57:49.960 --> 00:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>prayer to the gods to bless the proposed city for academics.

945
00:57:54.559 --> 00:57:57.519
<v Speaker 1>Laws demonstrates the evolution of Plato's thinking and has been

946
00:57:57.559 --> 00:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>studied as an early work in jurisprudence and political theory.

947
00:58:01.519 --> 00:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>It contains, for example, the first elaborate discussion of criminal

948
00:58:04.960 --> 00:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>law in philosophy. Plato distinguishes types of homicide, intentions and

949
00:58:09.039 --> 00:58:13.440
<v Speaker 1>so on. It's less idealistic and more empirical, perhaps reflecting

950
00:58:13.480 --> 00:58:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Plato's gathering of information about how actual Cretan and Spartan

951
00:58:17.199 --> 00:58:21.159
<v Speaker 1>laws worked in the Lay period. One can sense Plato's

952
00:58:21.159 --> 00:58:25.679
<v Speaker 1>mind ranging freely over all subjects logic, Imparmenides and sophists,

953
00:58:25.800 --> 00:58:29.679
<v Speaker 1>physics and cosmology, and Timaeus and practical governance. In Laws.

954
00:58:30.559 --> 00:58:33.119
<v Speaker 1>He also wrote Philibus, a dialogue about the nature of

955
00:58:33.159 --> 00:58:36.079
<v Speaker 1>pleasure and the good life, where he ultimately argues that

956
00:58:36.159 --> 00:58:39.920
<v Speaker 1>neither pure pleasure nor pure intellect is sufficient. The best

957
00:58:39.960 --> 00:58:43.039
<v Speaker 1>life is a mixture of intelligence and measured pleasures, with

958
00:58:43.159 --> 00:58:47.039
<v Speaker 1>intellect ruling introducing the idea of a quantitative limit to pleasures.

959
00:58:48.119 --> 00:58:51.079
<v Speaker 1>And there are the critious fragment about Atlantis and Epidomies

960
00:58:51.239 --> 00:58:54.400
<v Speaker 1>as a kind of appendix to Laws. Plato's style in

961
00:58:54.440 --> 00:58:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the late works is often more didactic and less playful

962
00:58:57.239 --> 00:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>than in earlier dialogues. Socrates is no LEAs longer the

963
00:59:00.480 --> 00:59:03.679
<v Speaker 1>only voice of wisdom. Plato is experimenting with different modes

964
00:59:03.679 --> 00:59:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of exposition, from the youth will portrayal of Socrates and

965
00:59:06.840 --> 00:59:09.679
<v Speaker 1>apology to the cosmic vision of Timaeus and the legislative

966
00:59:09.719 --> 00:59:14.119
<v Speaker 1>project of Laws. Plato's dialogues cover an outstanding range, yet

967
00:59:14.159 --> 00:59:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they form a coherent journey. In each stage of his life,

968
00:59:17.360 --> 00:59:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Plato sought to illuminate the question how should we live

969
00:59:20.360 --> 00:59:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in the light of what is ultimately real and good?

970
00:59:23.559 --> 00:59:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Early on, he set the moral and intellectual stage with

971
00:59:26.320 --> 00:59:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Socratic questioning. In the middle, he posited a visionary answer

972
00:59:30.320 --> 00:59:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that we should live guided by the eternal forms by

973
00:59:33.000 --> 00:59:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the true, the good, the beautiful, and organize our souls

974
00:59:36.320 --> 00:59:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in societies accordingly. In the Lay period he tested and

975
00:59:40.559 --> 00:59:44.679
<v Speaker 1>refined these ideas, acknowledging human limitation but still striving for

976
00:59:44.719 --> 00:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the best attainable order. Plato's theories of forms, though criticized

977
00:59:48.840 --> 00:59:51.360
<v Speaker 1>even in antiquity, remains one of the great strokes of

978
00:59:51.360 --> 00:59:55.679
<v Speaker 1>philosophical genius. It offers a way to think about universals, ideals,

979
00:59:55.760 --> 00:59:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and objective values. When we talk today about something being

980
00:59:59.480 --> 01:00:03.159
<v Speaker 1>ideal or perfect, or when mathematicians speak of perfect circles

981
01:00:03.400 --> 01:00:06.679
<v Speaker 1>or iffidence sets that no one ever fully sees, we are,

982
01:00:06.719 --> 01:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>to some extent speaking platonically. His concept of a reality

983
01:00:11.159 --> 01:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>beyond appearances laid groundwork from metaphysics and even theological thinking.

984
01:00:15.800 --> 01:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Plotinus and later Neoplatonists interpreted Plato's form of the good

985
01:00:19.519 --> 01:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>as akin to divine principle. Plato's allegory of the cave

986
01:00:23.480 --> 01:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>still resonates in any context where people feel stuck in

987
01:00:26.480 --> 01:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>ignorance or illusion, whether one applies it to media culture

988
01:00:29.679 --> 01:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like citizens glued to flickering TV shadows in a dark room,

989
01:00:33.320 --> 01:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>or the need for education to liberate and enlighten the

990
01:00:36.840 --> 01:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>cave allegory has been used to discuss everything from the

991
01:00:39.480 --> 01:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>persistence of conspiracy theories, mistaking shadows for reality, to the

992
01:00:43.519 --> 01:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>journey of personal growth. In ethics and politics, Plato set

993
01:00:48.199 --> 01:00:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the terms of debate by insisting that questions of how

994
01:00:50.679 --> 01:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>to live must consider the health of the soul and

995
01:00:53.280 --> 01:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the objective good. His distrust of democracy, born from seeing

996
01:00:58.000 --> 01:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it condemned Socrates and Flounder and War, and his idea

997
01:01:01.039 --> 01:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>philosopher kings have been hotly debated. Today, we still struggle

998
01:01:05.400 --> 01:01:09.239
<v Speaker 1>with how to ensure knowledgeable governance. Plato's solution was extreme,

999
01:01:09.559 --> 01:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>but his diagnosis of demagogery and ignorant mass opinion seems prescient.

1000
01:01:14.719 --> 01:01:17.719
<v Speaker 1>The Republic's critique of poetry and art as mere imitation

1001
01:01:17.920 --> 01:01:21.719
<v Speaker 1>spurred responses by Aristotle and others, and much later gave

1002
01:01:21.760 --> 01:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>fada to debates about art's role should our challenge or

1003
01:01:25.199 --> 01:01:29.159
<v Speaker 1>uphold moral truths. Plato took his stance art is suspect

1004
01:01:29.280 --> 01:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>unless aligned with truth that many disagree with, but grappling

1005
01:01:32.960 --> 01:01:37.559
<v Speaker 1>with his challenge helped define esthetics as a discipline. Plato's

1006
01:01:37.559 --> 01:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>influence on subsequent philosophy is immeasurable. His student, Aristotle would

1007
01:01:41.760 --> 01:01:45.719
<v Speaker 1>diverge on many points, especially rejecting forms existing apart from things,

1008
01:01:45.960 --> 01:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but Aristotle's system is in dialogue with Plato's at every turn.

1009
01:01:50.119 --> 01:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>In late Antiquity. During the Renaissance, the revival of Plato

1010
01:01:53.519 --> 01:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>contributed to new ideas about love, like Platonic love as

1011
01:01:56.880 --> 01:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>understood by Marsilio Ficino and others, and even scientific rationalism

1012
01:02:01.119 --> 01:02:04.719
<v Speaker 1>took some Platonic cues. Galileo and Kepler were fascinated by

1013
01:02:04.760 --> 01:02:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Plato's mathematical view of nature. Kepler described astronomer as leaving

1014
01:02:08.599 --> 01:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the cave of Earth to see cosmic order. Academically, Plato's

1015
01:02:13.320 --> 01:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>dialogues continue to be analyzed line by line. The Stanford

1016
01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Encyclopedia notes how exploratory and multi dimensional Plato is, refusing

1017
01:02:21.840 --> 01:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>to reduce philosophy to a dry system. This is why

1018
01:02:25.119 --> 01:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>we keep reading him. Each dialogue is not just an argument,

1019
01:02:28.559 --> 01:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but a literary drama inviting reinterpretation. For example, is the

1020
01:02:33.280 --> 01:02:38.199
<v Speaker 1>republic primarily about individual morality or utopian politics or both?

1021
01:02:39.280 --> 01:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Is the Symposia more about love or about the nature

1022
01:02:41.639 --> 01:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of philosophy itself with Socrates as the ultimate beloved. Different

1023
01:02:46.440 --> 01:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>errors have found new meanings inclosing Perhaps the best way

1024
01:02:50.639 --> 01:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>to appreciate Plato is to recall the scene at the

1025
01:02:53.199 --> 01:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>end of Feto. Socrates have given his final teaching on

1026
01:02:57.039 --> 01:02:59.599
<v Speaker 1>the immortality of the soul and the form of life.

1027
01:03:00.039 --> 01:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Calmly drinks poison and dies among friends, saying his last

1028
01:03:03.440 --> 01:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>words a reminder to offer a sacrifice to a Scleppius,

1029
01:03:07.079 --> 01:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the god of healing, as if death is a cure

1030
01:03:09.840 --> 01:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for the illness of life. Plato was at present. He

1031
01:03:13.599 --> 01:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>knows Plato was sick that day, but he memorialized his

1032
01:03:16.559 --> 01:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>teacher with such power that readers for two thousand or

1033
01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>four hundred years feel they were in that Athenian jail room.

1034
01:03:23.440 --> 01:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Plato's writings thus heal in a way they ain't too.

1035
01:03:26.559 --> 01:03:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Cure us of ignorance. By engaging us in dialogue, by

1036
01:03:30.239 --> 01:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>challenging us to question appearances, those shadows on the wall,

1037
01:03:33.800 --> 01:03:38.079
<v Speaker 1>and ascend towards truth, Plato stimulates the philosophical impulse in

1038
01:03:38.159 --> 01:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>his audience. In these episodes, we have followed Plato's journey

1039
01:03:42.800 --> 01:03:46.199
<v Speaker 1>from the gadfly and Athens to the visionary in the Academy.

1040
01:03:46.639 --> 01:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>But the journey he really cares about is the one

1041
01:03:48.880 --> 01:03:52.519
<v Speaker 1>inside each reader's soul. Turning it from darkness to light.

1042
01:03:53.519 --> 01:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>In that sense, Plato's true academy is not just the

1043
01:03:57.039 --> 01:04:00.559
<v Speaker 1>location in Athens. It is wherever people gather to earnestly

1044
01:04:00.599 --> 01:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>discuss and seek wisdom, And through his dialogues, that academy

1045
01:04:04.360 --> 01:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is still open, inviting us to become lovers of wisdom

1046
01:04:07.719 --> 01:04:13.719
<v Speaker 1>philosophers in our own right. Thank you all for listening,

1047
01:04:13.960 --> 01:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and hope you all enjoyed, And tell the next one.
