Speaker 1: What's going on?
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for listening to this podcast. It
is heard live every day from noon to three on
WBT Radio in Charlotte. And if you want exclusive content
like invitations to events, the weekly live stream, my daily
show prep with all of the links, become a patron,
go to thepetecleanershow dot com. Make sure you hit the
subscribe button. Get every episode for free right to your
smartphone or tablet. And again, thank you so much for
your support. So let's talk radicalization and the revolution. Okay,
James Lindsay, I've had him on the program, I've quoted
his work extensively for years. Self described anti communist, the line,
the issue is never the issue, The issue is always
the revolution. I mentioned this last hour. I've mentioned it
many times over the past few years. I first heard
of this line from James Lindsay, but he was quoting
somebody else, and I forget who that original person was.
I'm I'm sorry, I forgot, but he did tell me
who it was. I forgot who it was though. But
he's got a write up today about this Ice shooting
and what's really going on. This is a this is
a this is an outcome of a larger operation. Okay,
and you see it, and once you can once you
see it, you can't unsee it. And that's where I'm at,
whether it's the tent to fada right or it's the
hands up, don't shoot stuff. By the way, I saw
the Heritage Foundation, one of their scholars was talking in
an interview about how the Black Lives Matter movement apparently
got seated with some millions of dollars from Hugo Chavez
years before we saw the street fights.
Speaker 1: And the BLM movement emerge.
Speaker 2: Hugo chab has died what a decade ago or less
little almost a decade ago. The point was to foment
dissent and street violence and protests. It's a destabilization effort.
And this is right out of the Soviet playbook.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: They they had a play They had a list of
things that they when you know, when the when the
Soviet Union fell and we got all of this information
out of the Kremlin, when they published all of these
secret files and reports and stuff. We know what they
were doing. And by the way, our government does this
through the Color Revolutions and the State Department. You foment
dissent against the against the ruling regime. So let me
go over to James's write up. Minnesota has provided us
with yet another good example of the communist and radical
principle of your target's reaction is your real action.
Speaker 1: I mentioned this in the last hour as well.
Speaker 2: The action is to induce the reaction, which is a
key strategic tactic. For many months, Ice and other federal
law enforcement, not to mention Trump himself, have been made
out to be the kinds of tyrants that have to
be stopped at almost any cost, including by reckless citizen
actions like obstructing law enforcement, resisting arrest, throwing things.
Speaker 1: At police, etc. Et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2: All of it is framed out in ridiculous false narratives
designed to come true at the moment of crisis, at
which point they will then seize control of the narrative
to drive specific pre planned action. Right, you foment the discent,
the disruption, the violence. Then when you get the reaction,
you then claim victim. My god, I can't believe they
did this to us.
Speaker 1: Here's what we demand now.
Speaker 2: In this case, the false narratives are not just about
the status of federal law enforcement and ICE, but also
about their alleged unwillingness to work with or coordinate with
local and state police who have behind the scenes been
ordered to be non compliant, if not softly antagonistic. Right,
we just heard this very thing from Tim Walls the governor.
Christy Nome at Homeland Security has pointed out that the
governor and the mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Fry, that they
have refused to cooperate with ICE, and now they're demanding
cooperation from ICE, right, so they refuse to cooperate. That
allows them to paint ICE as the villain. This is
called operational preparation of the environment. Operational preparation of the environment.
In the unrestricted or political warfare environment in which radicals
today do their work. The model they are using is
called reflexivity. George Soros has described it in his terms
as shoelace dialectic. This is their theory of change. This
is how do we go about overthrowing Western society, overthrowing
free market capitalism. How do we go about doing it? Reflexivity,
You sort of create this environment, you prepare operationally, prepare
the environment so when the spark occurs, you are then
able to take advantage of that and destabilize. The goal
is always to create antagonistic situations between citizens who can
be framed as fighting a noble anti oppression cause, and
ice who can be framed as engaging in unwelcome oppression.
By ordering local and state police to be uncooperative, not
only do the operations fall more heavily on federal law enforcement,
but also several other things are achieved, Like locals can
be led to believe that federal law enforcement is operating
outside the bounds of the more local law against the
wishes of their state and locality, which they are led
to believe hold sovereignty. You just heard Tim Wall say
that too. We believe in states' rights.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: This is the frame through which these protesters, demonstrators, observers leftists, agitators.
This is what they view this issue through. This is
the lens that they are using. Because they are led
to believe the Feds are operating outside the bounds of
the local laws. This generates a conflict between the supremacy
clause and the Constitution and state law enforcement, and citizens
are led to believe that that renders the federal law
enforcement officers out of line. That's why I keep bringing
this back to this idea that they do not want
the federal immigration laws enforced. And you heard Mike in
the previous hoary called in and said, no, no, no,
it's the way they're doing it.
Speaker 1: No, it's not it is not. See.
Speaker 2: I will not be gas lit by people who either
don't understand what is occurring here or are actively part
of what is going on here. Local and state police
are not usually openly antagonistic. That thereby creates an illusion
of resistance to the Feds, and they cannot actually fulfill
because of their roles shifting responsibility than to the activists
to the citizens right. So local and state cops can't
be openly antagonistic because that would create this obvious image
of nullification, so they all fload that onto the activist crowd.
Circumstances where local citizens are believed to be on the
side of the rightful law against oppressive alien law and
may expect diminished or no consequences for resisting the alien
law even though it is actually supreme. He says there
are more that we could think of, I'm sure, but
a key point is that the leadership in states like
Minnesota know that they are creating this powder keg of
citizens versus federal law enforcement. In this case, it's ICE
while spreading various agitating narratives like fascism, protecting communities and
neighbors right, they are primary. They are the primary willful
bad actors in this situation, together with some professional and
other paid agitators who take things to the next level
out on the streets. The goal is to get citizens
to obstruct and even threaten or attack ICE, which in
effect creates a decision dilemma for ICE and federal law enforcement.
Either they can stand down and thus negate the supremacy
clause and fail to do their jobs, or they can
act within their authority and seek to arrest and detain
the people obstructing their lawful mandate that the States are
resisting less directly and more through engineered chicanery. He uses
a different word there, I'll say chicanery or Shenanigan's right.
This is the decision that Democrat politicians and they're sick offants.
This is the decision that they are trying to force
the federal government to make. This is why the nullification
crisis in the fourth turning the crisis phase. This is
why it becomes so dangerous because Neither one of these
authorities are going to take the off rim They're both
going to keep pressing their authority. Once this happens in
an enough times, statistics kind of take over. Some proportion
of those antagonistic account encounters will go sideways. Eventually you'll
find a federal law enforcement agent that does something either
reasonably or unreasonably to frame it. Then it will be
framed as an illegitimate overreaction and initiate the reflexive campaign
on what looks like firm footing. This reflexivity dialectic works
by generating the conditions for chaos and then placing down
guideposts through the chaos once the chaos arises.
Speaker 1: Does that make sense? Right?
Speaker 2: And this is the same principle as the antidote is
made in the same lab as the illness. Right, you
create the chaos and then say follow me, I will
restore order. I will lead you through this case. Us,
you just have to give up some of your freedoms.
You just have to give up some of the things
that you enjoyed, or the way of life you had before,
or whatever. That's the theory of change. See, you know,
stories are powerful. They help us make sense of things.
To understand experiences. Stories connect us to the people of
our past while transcending generations. They help us process the
meaning of life and our stories are told through images
and videos. Preserve your stories with Creative Video started in
nineteen ninety seven and Minhill, North Carolina. It was the
first company to provide this valuable service, converting images, photos
and videos into high quality produced slide shows, videos and albums.
The trusted, talented and dedicated team at Creative Video will
go over all of the details with you to create
a perfect project. Satisfaction guaranteed. Drop them off in person
or mail them. They'll be ready in a week or two.
Memorial videos for your loved ones, videos for rehearsal, dinners, weddings, graduations, Christmas,
family vacations, birthdays, or just your family stories all told
through images. That's what your photos and videos are. They
are your life told through the eyes of everyone around
you and all who came before you, and they will
tell others to come who you are. Visit creative video
dot com. Reading through James Lindsay's take on what we're seeing,
what we're well, what is happening, but what a lot
of people aren't seeing. With regard to the ice shooting
up in Minneapolis yesterday. In nineteen ninety two, George Soros
wrote a book called The Alchemy of Finance. In the
very first chapter, he talks about this theory of change
and what he calls reflexivity dialectic. And you generate the
conditions for chaos, and then you place down guideposts his word,
through the chaos once it arises. Right, create the chaos,
and then show people the way through. The goal is
to generate chaotic environments in which historical change his term,
can occur, and then to shape the outcome of that
change when it arrives by leading people to believe certain
things about the chaotic environment they're in that gets them
to take specific actions that they would not otherwise take.
In this case, the points of the reflexive campaign are
really obvious because they keep saying them over and over
and over again, which is what well, we just heard it.
Get Ice out of Minnesota, which would also have the
benefit of protecting their rampant fraud that they've been engaged in.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Also, impeachments maybe of Secretary Gnome, maybe somebody else, I
don't know, take down a political rival, so then they
can demand a more compliant replacement. Maybe these are classic
Bolshevik moves, use Soros's media based reflexive dialectic as the mechanism,
and as Governor, Tim Walls made clear he's willing to
try to induce a profound crisis by naming Minnesota as
being at war with the federal government. That's what he
said yesterday in his press conference. We've never been at
war with the federal government like we are now. We
have been states have gone to war against the federal government.
It was called the Civil War. You, being a history teacher,
should know that. By the way, not for nothing, Tim
Walls chose the anniversary of the timm And Square massacre
to get married and did a teaching program over in
communist China. He is a big fan of the Communist
Chinese has been for decades. We talked about this when
he was named veep. I'm sure he learned nothing from
the Communists in China though, anyway, he says. Lindsay says
that Walls is willing to induce a profound crisis by
naming Minnesota as being at war with the federal government
and threatening to attempt to deploy the National Guard against
federal law enforcement. That would be a violation of their
constitutional oath, which also then creates a constitutional crisis and
is frankly direct insurrection, and he should probably be prosecuted
for that. But this puts the Trump administration in a
similar dilemma as the ICE agents are in. Right, they're
forcing the reaction. It forces the Trump administration to make
a decision.
Speaker 1: You either deal with.
Speaker 2: Waltz on these terms and trigger a huge, falsely justified
reaction on the left, or you let him get away
with what amounts to insurrection to avoid the trap. The
stakes are very high.
Speaker 1: He says.
Speaker 2: So there's the Minnesota what he's calling the Ice Floyd syop,
instead of the George Floyd's Ice Floyd. There's the Minnesota
Ice Floyd syop. In a nutshell, they've used the reaction
of the Ice officer to justify not just this campaign,
but the direct actions in the streets, which are coordinated,
funded and ready to be activated in the same way
the National Guard is on standby and to activate it
with a certain population, most of whom are on the left,
and it will work for them. That's what's happening. That's
not what people recognize is happening because our education systems
were taken over. These institutions were taken over by the
people who employ these very tactics, and they don't want
to teach anybody to see through these tactics, but they
are interested in teaching people how to employ these tactics
to be good little activists. Right, Uh, let me go
over to Oh, actually, before I do that, let me go.
Speaker 1: I saw this on Twitter last night.
Speaker 2: Written up by mimetic Sisyphus, who says, I think a
lot of radicalization happens in spaces where it's just all talk.
Everything is hypothetical. It's easy to LARP as a revolutionary.
LARP means live action role playing. So when you hear
somebody call somebody a LARPer, right, that's what they're It's
just they're they're play acting. So it's easy to LARP
as a revolutionary, as somebody who stands against depression. There's
a lack of seriousness about it all. You start to
believe the memes, you start to believe you're the hero,
you're the main character. Then you convince yourself to do
something really dumb, like pull your car in front of
police officers. They draw their guns and the larp crumbles.
You're not that person. This is real life and those
are real guns. Nothing but getting the hell out of here,
screams in her brain. She probably didn't see the officer
standing in front of her car as she smashes the gas.
Now the officers can't know this. Of course, they don't
know what she's thinking. They just know when guns are drawn,
telling her to get out of the vehicle. She slammed
the gas in the direction of an officer. See, they're
not in a larp. Their job is real. They encounter
people who want to kill them, so they fire. No
one in this woman's life told her that she's on
a destructive LARP. She was encouraged by her peer group
viral videos of similarly similarly lost radical LARPers getting nothing
but praise online. Politicians calling the in force of our
laws akin to Nazis, calling them illegitimate, calling them evil,
telling their citizens to make their voices heard. Everyone in
her life failed her. She needed somebody to tell her
to grow up. Instead, she had no one, and now
she's dead. A horrible case of internet radicalization. Rob Province,
writer out of Tennessee, says this isn't a game and
Democrats need to stop telling their voters to go out
and do things that'll get them killed. Will they all right?
Holiday football has arrived. Right With Draft Kings sportsbook and
official sports betting partner of the NFL, the unexpected can
turn game day into payday. And don't forget Draft Kings
as you're back with early exit. Pretty neat function here.
If your player goes down in the first half, you
still get paid in cash. Download the Draft King sports
book app.
Speaker 1: And use the code PETE. That's code pete.
Speaker 2: Customers can bet five bucks and get two hundred dollars
in bonus bets if your bet wins instantly. In partnership
with Draft Kings, the Crown is yours. Gambling problem call
one eight hundred gambler In New York call eight seven
seven eight hope and why, or text hope and Why
two four six seven three six nine.
Speaker 1: In Connecticut.
Speaker 2: Help is available for problem gambling Call eight eight eight
seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG
dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill, casino
and Resort Kansas. Pass through of per wager tax may
apply in Illinois twenty one plus age and eligibility varies
by jurisdiction. Void in Ontario, restrictions apply. Bet must win
to receive bonus bets, which expire in seven days. Minimum
mods required for additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG,
dot co slash audio limited time offer. Gary from Boston says,
I hate to get all conspiratorial, but this sounds or
this seems like another false flag.
Speaker 1: I don't believe it's that. I'll explain in a minute.
Speaker 2: It seems like the protesters around the country were already
ready for the marching orders. This is so well orchestrated
and produced. I just wouldn't believe any darn story that
comes out of Minnesota. Okay, So first, why is it,
in my opinion, not a false flag? Okay, because it's
not doing anything that would empower the authorities, the federal government.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: False flag would be if like they brought somebody in
on their own to attack or murder an ice agent
in order to induce some sort of reaction.
Speaker 1: That would be a false flag.
Speaker 2: This is, as I described, operational preparation of the environment.
So to your point, when you say that it seems
like it's well orchestrated, it is. It's not a false
flag operation. It is operational prep for the environment. As
James Lindsay described, this is part of the political warfare
environment that radicals do their work in today. They're you know,
this is their theory of change, their reflexivity dialectic. That's
that's how you get things to change and people to
agree with you doing. I mean, think about the aftermath
of George Floyd, right, same thing. You had people in
positions of power adopting positions like the defund the police movement.
That would be absolutely absurd to have pitched, let alone
passed any kind of you know, local rules or ordinances
before George Floyd. If you had gotten up there as
a local elected at city council and said we need
to just disband our police force. We're not going to
do policing anymore, nobody would have taken you seriously. However,
once you get the spark, once you get the chaos
after the spark, then everybody's looking for some semblance of order,
or as Soros calls it, guideposts through the chaos. You're
now there saying follow me out of the chaos. I
know how to get out of the chaos. And the
chaos is created by you. Right, you have created this
environment for the chaos and then to harness that chaos
and provide those guide posts to get your change.
Speaker 1: That's the theory.
Speaker 2: It's very similar to Cloward and Piven, just theirs was
more of a bureaucratic kind of approach. These lefty social
scientists or whatever that crafted the plan back in what
the sixties, I guess, and their idea was to overload
all of the welfare systems to bang inkrupt the governments
that would then create the unrest, and then you offer
the guideposts through the chaos and create a universal basic.
Speaker 1: Income and just hand out money to people.
Speaker 2: And from there now you're controlling people's money and now
you can control them. Right, that's the idea. Again, this
is all leftist ideology. It all comes from the same place.
Let me see here back to the text line, I
don't know what Jesse Ventura would would do as governor.
Speaker 1: That I don't know.
Speaker 2: Stan says, what would happen if Donald Trump were to
come out now and definitively say, quote, this woman acted stupidly.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well that's what Obama did.
Speaker 2: Remember after Lewis Gates, Harvard professor Guy got arrested because
he was seen breaking into a home turned out to
be his own home, and so a neighbor called the
cops seeing somebody break into the house. Cop shows up.
Lewis Gates throws a tantrum, how dare you? You're a
white cop. I'm a black man. Don't you think I
can afford this home and all this other stuff? And
so the cop arrests him, and Obama comes out immediately
and says the cop acted stupidly. And then they had
the beer summit.
Speaker 1: And all of that. Let me see here, this is
seven oh four number, Pete.
Speaker 2: I know you're all about solutions, So how about we
trade the state of Minnesota for Greenland. I've heard there
have been pitches to swap Minnesota with Alberta. I've heard
that they very resource rich and more conservative. Seven oh
four number says, can you explain to me how Walls,
Tim Wall's governor can threaten to activate a federally funded
national guard against the federal law enforcement. No, but that's
the point. The point is to create the constitutional crisis.
This is at the heart of the immigration enforcement actions
as well. Right, it's a constitutional crisis. You have the
federal government and attempting to enforce federal law, and you
have states and local jurisdictions refusing to comply in an
attempt to nullify the federal law without going through the
the messy and difficult process of changing the laws. And
so they're they're they're there's creating, they're they're preparing operational
preparation of the environment. And then you force your opponents
to make a decision. Either way, you will be able
to claim victory or victim status. And you're the oppressed,
you're the righteous, you're the hero, You're the one standing up,
you know, for noble purposes. Although I have seen some
there's one suggestion that Trump could activate the National Guard,
put it under federal control, call up Tim Walls, and
if he refuses to follow orders, then you court martial him. Yeah,
but that's what I mean. This is how, this is
how nullification crises escalate very very quickly into shooting wars,
because each side is going to try to force the
other to abandon its position. John says caller Mike in
the last hour said the quiet part out loud just
before you stopped his gas lighting. He said, it's not
that Democrats don't want to enforce laws. It's which laws
they want to enforce. He said, that's right, he said
that right at the very end, they said, and how
the being enforced, how they're being I just don't like
the look of it. Well, maybe you should have thought
of that about that while the last administration was allowing
fifteen million people into the country illegally, Paul says, I
was hoping that you would lay into Gary.
Speaker 1: Not my fault, McFadden some more. Well, there's there will
be time for that. I am sure.
Speaker 2: Those who have never served as a first responder do
not understand the speed that violent things happen when you
are in an incident. The video will not show those things. Yeah,
I mean, that's this is what I mean. We can
all look at the videos and slow them down and
make all sorts of determinations about what we see and
all of this. But that officer had less than two
seconds to decide whether or not his life was in danger.
That's why I recommend like getting out of the car
when the cops approach you and say get out of
the car, and definitely don't like gun it when one's
standing in front of you. All right, if you're listening
to this show, you know I try to keep up
with all sorts of current events. And I know you
do too, and you've probably heard me say get your
news from multiple sources. Why Well, because it's how you
detect media bias, which is why I've been so impressed
with ground News. It's an app and it's a website
and it combines news from around the world in one place,
so you can compare coverage and verify information. You can
check it out at check dot ground, dot news, slash pete.
I put the link in the podcast description too. I
started using ground News a few months ago and more
recently chose to work with them as an affiliate because
it lets me see clearly how stories get covered and
by whom. The blind spot feature shows you which stories
get ignored by the left and the right. See for
yourself check dot ground, dot news slash pete. Subscribe through
that link and you'll get fifteen percent off any subscription.
I is the vantage plan to get unlimited access to
every feature. Your subscription then not only helps my podcast,
but it also supports ground News as they make the
media landscape more transparent. Seth writes in SDS Radical is
that students for a democratic society. I think of something
like that socialist group from the sixties. The issue is
never the issue. The issue is always the revolution. In
other words, the cause, whether inner city blacks or women,
it's never really the cause, but only an occasion to
advance the real cause, which is the accumulation of power
to make the revolution. That's from David Horowitz, Barack Obama's
rules for Revolution, the Elenski model. Oh maybe it was
David Horowitz. Allan says, I would not want Mike representing
me in any legal proceedings. Jody says, thanks for continuing
to educate us. Pete, You're welcome. I'm a giver.
Speaker 1: What can I say most of us.
Speaker 2: Most of us have already experienced the George Floyd fiasco,
and we're not going to fall for it again. Jeff says,
I long for the good old days when everyone was
upset about me painting that rock in Charlotte. Either way,
I'm thanking Jesus said, I'm thinking Jesus Christ is sad
and Satan is happy. David says, did you notice how
soon the protesters are on the streets of New York
City five hours after Maduro's arrest with professional signs Yeah yeah,
protesting in favor of a dictator, a tyrant, a fascist.
Right Trump isn't going to allow the lefties to steamroll him,
No way, especially from a guy like Walls. That's from Allan.
Stanley says. If this keeps up, no one will want Minnesota.
We won't even be able to give it away. Let's
get something now while we can, And Brian says, you
also made a very valid point unless under Obama's rules
of engagement, which were horrific. You made the accurate point
that if mister kool Aid was correct, and he absolutely
was not, you don't have to wait till the cry
strikes you, but clearly did strike the officer.
Speaker 1: Or the car.
Speaker 2: You don't have to wait until the car strikes you,
but it clearly did strike the officer. Thank you for
benching mister kool Aid. I guess that was caller Mike.
I served twenty five years in CPDCMPD. Thank you, Brian
for your service. Appreciate it. Let me jump over here
and get Clark on the program.
Speaker 3: Hello Clark, Hey, Pete, how are you today?
Speaker 1: Good sir, how are you?
Speaker 3: I'm good? Listen. I talked to you about a year ago,
but this first time since you guys switched over to
eleven ten. But I said this the first time I
talked to you. But for the new listeners out there,
we have the best one two punch in the nation
when it comes to talk raady with you, Brett, I
appreciate that. So, hey, jd. Vance was just on a
national press conference.
Speaker 1: I saw clip of this. Yeah, yeah, he.
Speaker 3: Just yeah, he just announced a new attorney general position
is going to be created in the next probably week
to ten days, and it's going to be primarily to
investigate all this anti ice and also the fraud that's
been going on and you know, throughout the country. But
that was one thing I wanted to point out, and
then the other thing the press. He really kind of
hit it on the head. He's like, the press has
looked saying that this woman was going to Harris Teeter
and she, oh, that's a protest over there, so I'm
going to stop by, and he's like, she, you know,
she was impeding federal law. So there's a reason behind
the activities. So my main question is this, why can't
the FED go in and shut these sanctuary cities down?
Speaker 2: Well, I think it's because well, number one, I think
that's what these ice operations are intending to do without
doing it in a full frontal assault like that, right,
Like they're going in and doing the enforcement because the
locals are refusing to cooperate, and because of previous litigation
where states have tried to make the federal government enforce
immigration law under the Biden administration, for example, when you
had states like Texas that sued to try to force
Biden to do immigration enforcement and border protection and it
went through the courts and the court said the states can't.
The states can't do this. This is the federal responsibility.
So now that they got Trump in there, now Trump
is saying, well, this is our responsibility. So we're going
to take full responsibility and do it now. One thing
they could do is withhold all federal funding to sanctuary cities.
Like that is one way to do it, and I
would be okay with that. There would be litigation about it,
I'm sure, But if you're not willing to comply with
federal law and you're actively obstructing it, then it seems
to me like that would be that would be a
course of action.
Speaker 3: Well, hopefully something's going to be done soon, you know. Yeah,
But I appreciate that I was just kind of unsure
on like why they just don't go ahead and just
go in and change everything quickly.
Speaker 2: But well, well, I mean, so what in your mind?
What would that look like in your mind?
Speaker 3: I don't know laws, and I don't know, you know,
state by state, but from a federal standpoint, I would
assume that if you're doing anything against the United States
of America, especially the people like all these anti protests
and you know, basically not turning in illegal immigrants over
to Ice everything like that, why could they just not
get in. I don't know what the process would be,
but to me, that's so anti American, right.
Speaker 1: But you can't go in.
Speaker 2: I mean, so are you saying you go in and
arrest elected officials?
Speaker 3: Well, that's what they were. That's something that like JD.
Vance just kind of highlighted. He said, you know, we're
gonna just do attorneystal position is going to go in
and look at exactly what's going on, who's funding it
in these sanctuary cities, and find out if there's any
legal course of action. So he did say that. But
I'm not, like I said, I'm not a law expert.
Speaker 1: Yeah, no, I'm not. I'm not either.
Speaker 2: I just I'm thinking through in a practical way, and
I think what it comes down to is if you
this creates the very sort of dilemma that James Lindsay
was talking about that the Ice shooting has now presented.
It's just it's a different question, right. Also with the
National Guard deployment, it creates this this decision point that
they're they are inducing a reaction, right, They're trying to
force the administration to take an action or to react
to what they're doing, and then they use that reaction
for the chaos because they have already prepared the environment.
And you know, if Trump comes in and they try
to arrest Tim Walls, then you get more you know,
riots and chaos and everything else. Right, So that and
then they offer the guide post through the chaos. That's
their theory of.
Speaker 1: Change, gotcha.
Speaker 2: I think that's the and that's the issue, like do
you pick the fight? And a lot of people want,
myself included. I would prefer to avoid that kind of
a crisis. But if you've got a critical mass of
people in the country that are hell bent on forcing
that crisis to occur, I don't know how you.
Speaker 1: I don't know how you avoid it.
Speaker 3: Well, I think his name is Steven Miller with the administration.
Yeah right, yeah, I mean he said, you know, right
after what's his name, Kirk, Charlie Kirk assassinated that they
were like his and that his only main priority was
going to be to go in and go after all
of these you know, Soros whoever it is, and try
to figure this out and haven't prosecuted. But it's been
a while and I really haven't heard anything about that.
But you know, we've got to figure this out and
get it straightened out.
Speaker 2: Yeah, no, I agree. I appreciate the call Clark could
to hear. I do think they are pursuing the funding mechanisms.
They are doing that. Now what they will find and
whether they are able to prosecute, we shall see. All right.
Speaker 1: That'll do it for this episode.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for listening. I could not do
the show without your support and the support of the
businesses that advertise on the podcast, so if you'd like,
please support them too and tell them you heard it here.
You can also become a patron at my Patreon page
or go to thepetecleanershow dot com. Again, thank you so
much for listening and don't break anything while I'm gone.