1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:03,160
Speaker 1: What's going on?

2
00:00:03,200 --> 00:00:03,520
Speaker 2: Everybody?

3
00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:06,759
Speaker 1: Welcome into another episode of Prophet Picks. If you are new,

4
00:00:06,799 --> 00:00:10,160
we do always start the show by being transparent. Yesterday,

5
00:00:11,320 --> 00:00:13,119
it was a good day for myself. I had the

6
00:00:13,160 --> 00:00:17,239
Celtics game under two fifteen and a half. I don't

7
00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:22,519
think it even touched two hundred and the Wizards, the dirty, stinking,

8
00:00:22,679 --> 00:00:25,280
filthy dog of the day, Wizards plus fifteen and a

9
00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:27,719
half got to the window. Whatever number you got got

10
00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:30,120
to the window. So nice to window a day yesterday

11
00:00:30,120 --> 00:00:32,560
to start the week. You know, good to be back

12
00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:35,479
with you. Hopefully you had, you know, a good day

13
00:00:35,479 --> 00:00:35,880
as well.

14
00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:37,600
Speaker 2: Yeah.

15
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:40,719
Speaker 3: Wow, I was on the wrong side of that Boston

16
00:00:40,759 --> 00:00:44,000
Milwaukee game. Thought the Bucks would score. They never scored

17
00:00:44,039 --> 00:00:48,159
eighty one points in that one. Didn't work out at all,

18
00:00:48,159 --> 00:00:51,240
but it was the only NBA play for yesterday. Didn't

19
00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:53,840
like a heck of a lot across the board. So

20
00:00:54,039 --> 00:00:55,960
we'll look to make some money on this bigger board

21
00:00:55,960 --> 00:00:56,520
here today.

22
00:00:57,640 --> 00:01:00,960
Speaker 1: All right, let's let's do it. Appreciate job's happening on

23
00:01:01,039 --> 00:01:03,479
the chat. They're giving us some credit for some good

24
00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:06,400
picks and analysis yesterday. See if we can do it

25
00:01:06,439 --> 00:01:09,120
again here today. All right, we'll start with MAVs and

26
00:01:09,239 --> 00:01:12,959
Hornets opened up minus eleven up to thirteen total. Right

27
00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:16,560
around the opener, you have Kobe whiteout for this Horner's team.

28
00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:21,480
For Dallas, Martin and Washington are probable, Flag and Klay

29
00:01:21,599 --> 00:01:26,400
are double, Badley and Marshall are out. I mean, this

30
00:01:26,519 --> 00:01:30,760
Horner's team just continues to cover numbers, continues to hit

31
00:01:30,799 --> 00:01:33,079
their team total. But every way you want to bet

32
00:01:33,120 --> 00:01:36,400
on the Hornets seems like they're putting money in your

33
00:01:36,400 --> 00:01:40,239
pocket right now. So at this point, you know, especially

34
00:01:40,239 --> 00:01:42,599
with the injury report, it's hard for me to try

35
00:01:42,599 --> 00:01:44,359
to make a case for Dallas here. What do you think?

36
00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:48,799
Speaker 3: You know, Yeah, the numbers keep getting bigger on Charlotte,

37
00:01:48,799 --> 00:01:50,959
but it hasn't seemed to matter when they play a

38
00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:56,719
team in this particular class like Dallas. Teams that don't

39
00:01:56,719 --> 00:02:01,120
really care much about winning basketball games, bottom tier of

40
00:02:01,159 --> 00:02:05,719
the NBA, they cover the big numbers. I mean, ten

41
00:02:05,760 --> 00:02:10,280
and a half against Washington, win by seventeen, up that

42
00:02:10,360 --> 00:02:12,719
a little bit late, twelve and a half to Indiana

43
00:02:13,120 --> 00:02:16,439
on the road, win by twenty four. Is Charlotte's just

44
00:02:16,479 --> 00:02:20,240
doing the right thing both defensively and offensively, and Dallas's

45
00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:23,800
offense has gone stagnant. Last couple of games one oh

46
00:02:23,919 --> 00:02:26,199
five and eighty seven put up by the MAVs.

47
00:02:26,199 --> 00:02:29,000
Speaker 2: They continue to give it up freely.

48
00:02:29,599 --> 00:02:31,599
Speaker 3: Oklahoma City I don't think had a lot of interest

49
00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:33,680
the other night Ski in that one hundred and eighty

50
00:02:33,719 --> 00:02:34,400
seven game.

51
00:02:36,039 --> 00:02:37,719
Speaker 2: They'd come off of the Denver game.

52
00:02:37,759 --> 00:02:40,360
Speaker 3: I think it was so SGA's been back for a

53
00:02:40,360 --> 00:02:44,159
couple of games now was spot back for one game

54
00:02:44,199 --> 00:02:46,639
there and looked like they took it a little bit easy.

55
00:02:47,759 --> 00:02:50,360
But here against Charlotte, it's a start of a This

56
00:02:50,400 --> 00:02:54,120
looks like a six game road trip for Dallas. I

57
00:02:54,159 --> 00:02:57,400
don't know that you can expect any good results on

58
00:02:57,439 --> 00:03:01,240
this road trip. I don't know that Dallas is anxious

59
00:03:01,319 --> 00:03:03,919
to be out on the road and try and win

60
00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:07,080
ball games. So for me, it would probably be Charlotte

61
00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:11,840
at Charlotte full game total scares me a little bit

62
00:03:11,960 --> 00:03:14,800
simply because they've been playing really good defense, and I

63
00:03:14,840 --> 00:03:18,080
don't want to get involved full game with Dallas not

64
00:03:18,199 --> 00:03:21,919
playing very well offensively the last couple, So maybe Charlotte

65
00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:24,960
team total just looking here, well I talk looks like

66
00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:26,360
one twenty one and a half. I'll tell you what

67
00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:28,360
I would be happier just to lay.

68
00:03:28,199 --> 00:03:30,240
Speaker 2: The points with Charlotte. Tell you the truth.

69
00:03:30,319 --> 00:03:34,120
Speaker 3: Charlotte has been dominating this class of opponent as of late,

70
00:03:34,159 --> 00:03:36,280
and right now the odds makers can't seem to make

71
00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:38,759
the price on them high enough. So i'd probably look

72
00:03:38,879 --> 00:03:39,919
Charlotte minus thirteen.

73
00:03:41,479 --> 00:03:43,319
Speaker 1: All right, We'll move over to the next game. That's

74
00:03:43,360 --> 00:03:46,360
the Pistons, and the Calves opened up one and a

75
00:03:46,400 --> 00:03:49,520
half favorites for Detroit on the road. Total didn't really move.

76
00:03:49,719 --> 00:03:53,719
The side did go up by one. Andrew report. I

77
00:03:53,719 --> 00:03:56,400
don't see anybody on there for the Pistons. For the layers,

78
00:03:57,120 --> 00:04:00,680
Wade as questionable, Mitchell and Strews for me out here,

79
00:04:02,719 --> 00:04:05,560
and let's look at it. Let's look at the situationals.

80
00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:10,199
Not really anything. Both teams a little bit of rest here.

81
00:04:10,599 --> 00:04:13,240
The Cavaliers did lose the Pistons last time they played

82
00:04:13,240 --> 00:04:17,560
one nineteen and went twenty two. That was not that

83
00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:21,519
long ago. That was an other day. That was a

84
00:04:23,199 --> 00:04:26,000
what was that a couple of days ago, So a

85
00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:27,800
chance for the Cavaliers to get a little bit of

86
00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:32,680
quick revenge here. This is not one that I was

87
00:04:32,720 --> 00:04:36,879
really locking in on, but I do think, you know,

88
00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:39,959
being at home I feel like they're I don't like

89
00:04:39,959 --> 00:04:43,399
that Metell's out, but I feel like at home, like

90
00:04:43,439 --> 00:04:48,720
the rest of the role players should play really good.

91
00:04:48,759 --> 00:04:50,759
I want to get towards a bounce back in this

92
00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:53,480
spot with the Cavs more than laying with Detroit.

93
00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:57,079
Speaker 3: What do you think, Yeah, you remember that game a

94
00:04:57,079 --> 00:04:59,480
couple of days ago, because I remember you saying, it

95
00:04:59,519 --> 00:05:03,279
looks like they are just asking me to bet the

96
00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:04,160
Cavaliers here.

97
00:05:04,399 --> 00:05:06,360
Speaker 2: Remember, there was no reason for the price.

98
00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:09,279
Speaker 3: To go down, and it went down in favor of Detroit,

99
00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:13,439
and the Cavaliers did cover that number. It was hard

100
00:05:13,439 --> 00:05:15,759
to make a fundamental case for him in that game,

101
00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:21,240
but Money was anti Detroit. Money was right. Cleveland played

102
00:05:21,279 --> 00:05:23,920
them close. We'll see if they can get the quick

103
00:05:23,959 --> 00:05:27,160
revenge here. That game got up to two forty one Ski,

104
00:05:27,199 --> 00:05:29,240
and I'm not so sure that this game is going

105
00:05:29,319 --> 00:05:31,879
to climb that high. I kind of like under here

106
00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:36,879
in this second match. You know, I'm one of those

107
00:05:36,920 --> 00:05:39,959
who thinks that coaches again like to fix what went

108
00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:42,120
wrong the first time. I don't think either coach was

109
00:05:42,160 --> 00:05:44,720
happy with the two hundred and forty one point total

110
00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:50,000
in that particular game. So for me, the physicality of Detroit,

111
00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:53,240
the absence of Mitchell, and I know it was both present.

112
00:05:53,560 --> 00:05:55,839
Both of those things were present a few days ago

113
00:05:55,879 --> 00:05:56,680
when they met up.

114
00:05:57,279 --> 00:05:59,120
Speaker 2: But that game just.

115
00:05:59,040 --> 00:06:01,160
Speaker 3: Had a lot of shot and I don't know, it's

116
00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:05,560
not going to take that many misses here that were

117
00:06:05,600 --> 00:06:07,879
makes in that game to keep this thing under what's

118
00:06:07,920 --> 00:06:10,480
a pretty high total in my estimation to twenty eight

119
00:06:10,480 --> 00:06:13,319
and a half. You do see as low as to

120
00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:15,879
twenty seven and a half in a couple of places.

121
00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:19,279
So whichever way you like, shop it well, but I

122
00:06:19,399 --> 00:06:21,759
do like under twenty eight and a half in that game,

123
00:06:21,800 --> 00:06:25,560
I think the Pistons could win it, but I'm more

124
00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:26,439
inclined to play.

125
00:06:26,319 --> 00:06:31,240
Speaker 1: Under all right, this is probably probably not a game

126
00:06:31,279 --> 00:06:33,879
I'm gonna get there with dropping dimes like's cash team

127
00:06:33,959 --> 00:06:38,160
total under a lot of different opinions out there in

128
00:06:38,199 --> 00:06:42,720
the chat. This next game, I mean, I'm pretty I'm

129
00:06:42,759 --> 00:06:45,560
interested in a little bit, just a little bit here

130
00:06:46,839 --> 00:06:49,199
opened up. Fifteen and a half looks like fifteen and

131
00:06:49,199 --> 00:06:51,000
a half or sixteen depending where you're shoting out a

132
00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:53,800
lot of movement on the total. Still no Franz Wagner,

133
00:06:54,519 --> 00:07:01,519
Anthony Black is questionable or Washington Laundry list, you walkin Fouksovich,

134
00:07:02,199 --> 00:07:07,439
Saw Russell, George Davis all out, Gills questionable. You know,

135
00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:11,639
we made some money with the Wizards yesterday and now

136
00:07:12,279 --> 00:07:17,199
back to back traveling no Keishawn, George's time around two

137
00:07:19,839 --> 00:07:23,399
versus Magic team who let me just they did lose it. Yeah,

138
00:07:23,839 --> 00:07:28,639
they got blown out in their last game. They lost

139
00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:31,160
back to back games, got blown out in their last game.

140
00:07:31,560 --> 00:07:34,720
Now see the Wizards here in our sixteen point favorites.

141
00:07:35,759 --> 00:07:37,439
I really think that they can blow them out the gym,

142
00:07:37,839 --> 00:07:41,000
you know I do. It's just I don't like the

143
00:07:41,920 --> 00:07:44,199
I know Paolo and the coach don't like each other

144
00:07:46,759 --> 00:07:50,360
from hearing them talking to interviews. They're saying complete opposite,

145
00:07:50,399 --> 00:07:53,240
Like Polo's like, we're not making any adjustment at halftime.

146
00:07:53,439 --> 00:07:55,839
The coach is like, it's not about adjustment, it's about

147
00:07:55,839 --> 00:07:59,399
playing harder. So that makes me not like it. But

148
00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:01,639
this Wizard team that's going to be out there tonight,

149
00:08:02,199 --> 00:08:05,600
in this situation can still get blown out. So it's

150
00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:09,439
Magic or past. Any thoughts from you or any thoughts

151
00:08:09,439 --> 00:08:12,920
from you on Magic and Wizards.

152
00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:13,560
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think.

153
00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:19,199
Speaker 3: The first and when we're talking off air, my first

154
00:08:19,199 --> 00:08:21,920
inclination is I want to fade the Wizards in some capacity,

155
00:08:22,639 --> 00:08:25,439
whether it be laying points with Orlando or just betting

156
00:08:25,519 --> 00:08:29,079
Orlando team total. And I think for me, I'd rather

157
00:08:29,160 --> 00:08:34,399
be on over Orlando's team total. They're just not trustworthy enough,

158
00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:37,320
even though this is a blowout situation, just like last

159
00:08:37,399 --> 00:08:40,200
night was a look ahead situation for Houston. But if

160
00:08:40,279 --> 00:08:44,360
Orlando does blow Washington out, then they probably get above

161
00:08:44,399 --> 00:08:47,720
this number of one twenty two for their team total,

162
00:08:47,799 --> 00:08:49,879
which Washington.

163
00:08:49,480 --> 00:08:51,039
Speaker 2: Gives up on a regular basis.

164
00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:53,279
Speaker 3: The other thing the factor in here for Washington is

165
00:08:53,399 --> 00:08:55,200
I think Trey Young is going to play his first

166
00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:57,720
game tonight and Thursday.

167
00:08:58,039 --> 00:08:58,600
Speaker 2: Washington.

168
00:08:58,799 --> 00:09:01,840
Speaker 1: Huh, I thought it was he's listed out right now?

169
00:09:02,360 --> 00:09:02,879
Speaker 2: Oh? Is he?

170
00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:05,200
Speaker 1: Yeah? I thought they said he was going back on Thursday.

171
00:09:08,039 --> 00:09:10,759
Speaker 3: Yeah right, I got conflicting stuff. I'm reading here that

172
00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:14,320
tonight he's expected to make his Wizard's debut, regardless if

173
00:09:14,320 --> 00:09:16,639
he does or doesn't. If he does play, If he

174
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:20,120
does make his debut tonight, it makes it harder, I

175
00:09:20,159 --> 00:09:22,519
think on the Washington offense, not that it wouldn't be

176
00:09:22,559 --> 00:09:26,639
difficult already in the second of back to backs, and

177
00:09:26,759 --> 00:09:29,879
Houston obviously, when Washington got to one eighteen last night.

178
00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:32,879
It's obvious that Houston didn't give a fully focused defensive

179
00:09:32,879 --> 00:09:35,440
effort the Orlando gave me talk about the other day, Sky.

180
00:09:35,519 --> 00:09:39,480
They led Detroit at halftime, which is interesting that you

181
00:09:39,519 --> 00:09:41,919
bring up Paolo saying we don't make any halftime adjustments.

182
00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:44,799
They were winning at halftime, and they got destroyed in

183
00:09:44,840 --> 00:09:47,759
the second half. So could be some credence to either

184
00:09:47,919 --> 00:09:50,159
or could be some credence to the coach not thinking

185
00:09:50,200 --> 00:09:52,639
they played hard enough second half. Could be some credence

186
00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:56,000
to Ben Carroll thinking that we should have adjusted a

187
00:09:56,039 --> 00:09:59,399
few things to maintain that lead. But I like him

188
00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:02,360
here tonight. This tailor made for them, and they're still

189
00:10:02,399 --> 00:10:07,840
in that hunt for the sixth spot here in the playoffs,

190
00:10:07,919 --> 00:10:10,840
a game and a half behind Philadelphia. Winnable games are

191
00:10:10,879 --> 00:10:13,799
important to the Magic at this point in time, So

192
00:10:14,159 --> 00:10:17,440
I think I'm gonna play over one twenty two. But

193
00:10:17,440 --> 00:10:19,559
I wouldn't argue anybody off of laying the points with

194
00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:23,720
Orlando here. Just doesn't set up well for the Wizards.

195
00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:28,960
Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm I'm looking even more at the at the

196
00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:31,960
Magic here. I mean, they've they've blown out some of

197
00:10:31,960 --> 00:10:34,759
these weak teams they blew recently they blew the Kings out,

198
00:10:34,799 --> 00:10:42,759
the Nets out. I think it's doable. We're gonna think

199
00:10:42,759 --> 00:10:44,320
about it a little bit more. But I do like

200
00:10:44,399 --> 00:10:47,559
the magic here. You know, how we how are we doing?

201
00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:49,240
You know, time wise?

202
00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:52,440
Speaker 2: We're good right now? We are good right now?

203
00:10:52,720 --> 00:11:00,000
Speaker 1: All right, cool nets and heat. I can skip this game. Honestly,

204
00:11:00,320 --> 00:11:03,000
I have zero interest in beting either team. The nets

205
00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:04,840
so bad they can get blown out by his number.

206
00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:07,799
He haven't been playing good enough to lay this number.

207
00:11:08,279 --> 00:11:10,200
So this is a pass for me, anything for me.

208
00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:12,399
Speaker 2: You know, Yeah, it's another one.

209
00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:14,679
Speaker 3: I mean, I've been on this bandwagon a little bit

210
00:11:15,720 --> 00:11:19,080
now with Miami, but I do think, in fact, not

211
00:11:19,159 --> 00:11:21,960
even that I think, because I bet this game this morning.

212
00:11:21,960 --> 00:11:24,159
Speaker 2: I bet Miami over one nineteen and a half.

213
00:11:24,759 --> 00:11:27,080
Speaker 3: The Nets have they've gone owen seven since the break,

214
00:11:27,080 --> 00:11:28,919
and they've given up as many as one forty eight

215
00:11:28,960 --> 00:11:33,080
in a game, and they're just not playing on either

216
00:11:33,159 --> 00:11:34,440
end right now. In fact, I think there was a

217
00:11:34,480 --> 00:11:37,279
game where they only scored eighty two, so can't score,

218
00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:41,159
can't defend. But I like Miami's pace, and I like

219
00:11:41,240 --> 00:11:43,200
the fact that this is a defense they can pick

220
00:11:43,240 --> 00:11:44,080
on with that pace.

221
00:11:44,159 --> 00:11:46,679
Speaker 2: So I did play over one nineteen and a half

222
00:11:46,919 --> 00:11:48,679
team total Miami.

223
00:11:49,159 --> 00:11:53,159
Speaker 1: Good stuff there, I bet on that.

224
00:11:54,519 --> 00:11:55,039
Speaker 2: Tree young.

225
00:11:57,519 --> 00:12:00,240
Speaker 1: All right, let's get to the next one where we

226
00:12:00,279 --> 00:12:04,960
had Nicks and Raptors. Yes, opened up one and a

227
00:12:05,039 --> 00:12:06,799
half for the Knicks. Now two and a half, and

228
00:12:06,879 --> 00:12:08,960
the total comes down a little bit from two twenty

229
00:12:08,960 --> 00:12:10,639
three and a half as long as two twenty one

230
00:12:10,639 --> 00:12:16,960
and a half. And we have cnb out McBride out

231
00:12:16,960 --> 00:12:18,840
for this next team. It is the front of a

232
00:12:18,879 --> 00:12:20,559
back to back for the Knicks. They play Okay see

233
00:12:20,600 --> 00:12:24,960
tomorrow on ESPN, and that's gonna make me think, you

234
00:12:24,960 --> 00:12:28,120
know which game they care more about? Obviously, you know

235
00:12:28,159 --> 00:12:31,080
you want to look good on national TV. That game

236
00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:34,639
is at the Garden too, But I feel like this

237
00:12:34,679 --> 00:12:39,159
game matters too, standing wise. I mean, it's conference, Toronto's

238
00:12:39,200 --> 00:12:42,039
not that far behind New York. I feel like they

239
00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:44,279
have to care about both of these games. Really, if

240
00:12:44,480 --> 00:12:48,240
it was you know, a West Coast team not you know,

241
00:12:48,919 --> 00:12:51,720
or a team that they didn't really need to care about,

242
00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:55,360
I'll feel better about trying to back Toronto tonight. That

243
00:12:55,480 --> 00:12:58,000
was my first thought, trying to back Toronto here, But

244
00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:00,600
I think I'd have to look a little more towards

245
00:13:00,600 --> 00:13:03,519
the under neither team really playing with the pace. Both

246
00:13:03,559 --> 00:13:06,879
team has been pretty solid defensively lately, and you never know,

247
00:13:07,120 --> 00:13:09,519
you could still get some some rollouts. Guys saving their

248
00:13:09,600 --> 00:13:12,279
energy for Okay, see tomorrow from New York side, so

249
00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:14,320
lean under what do you think? You know?

250
00:13:16,039 --> 00:13:18,759
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'll make the case for Toronto here. Nick's have

251
00:13:18,879 --> 00:13:23,320
beaten this team eleven straight times. And you got a

252
00:13:23,320 --> 00:13:25,279
couple of guys on the Toronto side and the starting

253
00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:28,799
lineup RJ Barrett and Emmanuel click quickly who are x Knicks?

254
00:13:29,080 --> 00:13:33,080
So certainly they've lost three straight this year to the Knicks.

255
00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:36,080
This is the final time these two will play. I

256
00:13:36,120 --> 00:13:39,120
don't think Toronto wants to go oh to four against

257
00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:42,399
the Knicks, so I would expect maximum effort out of

258
00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:44,559
them here. Another thing when I was going through the

259
00:13:44,600 --> 00:13:48,600
games played earlier this season, SKI is that Yaka Pertl

260
00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:52,120
didn't play in two of those three losses. He only

261
00:13:52,159 --> 00:13:55,519
played in one, and he put up reasonable numbers ten points,

262
00:13:55,600 --> 00:13:57,360
nine boards in twenty five minutes.

263
00:13:57,720 --> 00:14:00,519
Speaker 2: And we've spoken often about how h whe.

264
00:14:00,279 --> 00:14:04,440
Speaker 3: It is for him to be there at the rim

265
00:14:04,480 --> 00:14:08,480
helping defend for Toronto. I like their defenders, you know,

266
00:14:08,519 --> 00:14:13,320
they've got length, Barnes, Ingram, Barrett, and the Knicks come

267
00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:15,919
off of that huge win against San Antonio. I know

268
00:14:15,960 --> 00:14:19,279
they've had a day in between, but still that was

269
00:14:19,320 --> 00:14:21,440
a big win for the Knicks. You saw that day,

270
00:14:21,919 --> 00:14:24,320
the energy they exerted. So I'm with you that I

271
00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:27,279
think the Knicks care about this. They're not in such

272
00:14:27,279 --> 00:14:30,279
a comfortable spot that they can't care. And i'd also

273
00:14:30,879 --> 00:14:33,000
you know, in the Knicks defense on that side of

274
00:14:33,039 --> 00:14:36,919
the ledger, they've owned this team basically. But I do

275
00:14:36,960 --> 00:14:39,960
take into account pretty heavily the fact that having peertleback

276
00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:44,600
is huge against the Knicks. And I think that the

277
00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:49,480
Quickly and Barrett stuff plays a little bit of a

278
00:14:49,480 --> 00:14:52,759
part here. I think Toronto's just a better defensive team

279
00:14:52,759 --> 00:14:54,799
at this point in time. So I won't disagree with under,

280
00:14:54,840 --> 00:14:57,039
but I'll probably side with Toronto here.

281
00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:05,679
Speaker 1: All Right, we agree on that. I don't I'm gonna

282
00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:09,960
be honest, the rest of these games, I don't necessarily

283
00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:15,000
care too much about, you know, so I'm gonna pick

284
00:15:15,039 --> 00:15:21,639
and choose sure, Spurs and Sixers. Spurs coming off that loss,

285
00:15:21,960 --> 00:15:24,840
opening up six and a half now up to minus eight,

286
00:15:26,120 --> 00:15:28,080
and uh total going from two thirty one and a

287
00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:30,559
half to thirty two and a half. Looking at the

288
00:15:30,600 --> 00:15:32,600
injury report, I only see plumb Lee out for the

289
00:15:32,639 --> 00:15:37,559
Spurs for the Sixers, though no Uber and be Broom

290
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:42,440
or PG. I like to think that the Spurs, off

291
00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:46,360
of that loss, you know, come out here and in

292
00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:48,679
flex on the Sixers team tonight. Six Ers, I believe,

293
00:15:48,679 --> 00:15:50,440
are also on the front end of a back to back.

294
00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:53,360
Are you doing six Ers and Spurs? Robino?

295
00:15:54,480 --> 00:15:57,519
Speaker 3: Same way? I like sian Antonio here. I think San

296
00:15:57,519 --> 00:16:00,720
Antonio because of the depth situation here, because of the

297
00:16:00,759 --> 00:16:03,879
size situation here. Andre Drummond has had to play a

298
00:16:03,879 --> 00:16:07,200
lot of minutes with Embiid on the bench and and

299
00:16:07,279 --> 00:16:12,679
a den bona energetic guy, but again against wembin Yama

300
00:16:12,799 --> 00:16:15,240
and the guys that san Antonio has in San Antonio.

301
00:16:15,279 --> 00:16:17,279
Speaker 2: Coming off that loss, the.

302
00:16:17,519 --> 00:16:22,320
Speaker 3: Sixer backcourt is everything here and losing Kelly Ubray for

303
00:16:22,399 --> 00:16:25,519
this game is nothing short of a big deal because

304
00:16:25,519 --> 00:16:29,679
the Sixers need all three of those guys on the perimeter, Maxi,

305
00:16:29,840 --> 00:16:33,519
Edgecomb and Uber to be effective. They can't defend Ski

306
00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:37,679
at this point in time. I don't know, you know,

307
00:16:37,919 --> 00:16:40,639
my dilemma becomes do I want San Antonio and lay

308
00:16:40,679 --> 00:16:42,240
the points, which I think is a really good bet.

309
00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:44,559
Or do I want to just bet san Antonio's offense

310
00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:48,120
against the Philly deepense or lack thereof, and it should

311
00:16:48,159 --> 00:16:53,200
be an absolute trip to the rim for them here,

312
00:16:53,279 --> 00:16:55,080
especially for Wembin Yama down low.

313
00:16:55,679 --> 00:16:57,440
Speaker 2: So I'd leave you with either one of those.

314
00:16:57,559 --> 00:16:59,879
Speaker 3: San Antonio team total up and over one twenty and

315
00:17:00,360 --> 00:17:03,960
especially after being shut down to under one hundred points

316
00:17:03,960 --> 00:17:05,680
the other night by the Nick san Attornio had been

317
00:17:05,720 --> 00:17:09,839
on a nice offensive role, so deep, so versatile, the

318
00:17:10,000 --> 00:17:13,720
entire rotation. So I like it two ways. I like

319
00:17:13,799 --> 00:17:16,079
the Spurs team total, and I like the Spurs laying

320
00:17:16,079 --> 00:17:18,880
the points and good stuff.

321
00:17:22,039 --> 00:17:26,960
Speaker 1: Maybe one more game, you know, maybe Lakers and Pelicans

322
00:17:28,039 --> 00:17:30,839
open ten down to eight and a half total up

323
00:17:30,839 --> 00:17:32,759
from two thirty five and a half to two forty

324
00:17:32,759 --> 00:17:34,359
two and a half. I mean, I agree with the

325
00:17:34,359 --> 00:17:36,160
market pushing it up. We know the Lakers don't play

326
00:17:36,200 --> 00:17:39,480
any defense. Ziona said he's going to play today. He's

327
00:17:39,519 --> 00:17:41,160
listed is questionable, but he said he was going to

328
00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:45,799
play today. I think you know you got Murphy back

329
00:17:45,799 --> 00:17:49,039
in the lineup. It looks like Pelicans should be able

330
00:17:49,079 --> 00:17:51,759
to score. I trust the Lakers to score. I think

331
00:17:51,839 --> 00:17:54,759
the total moved in the right direction, and I would

332
00:17:54,799 --> 00:17:57,680
not lay with the Lakers. What do you think here, Vino?

333
00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:00,000
Speaker 2: I couldn't agree more.

334
00:18:00,079 --> 00:18:02,920
Speaker 3: And I've read the same thing that Zion is going

335
00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:06,160
to play here, which probably contributes to the two thirty

336
00:18:06,160 --> 00:18:08,000
five and a half up to two forty two and

337
00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:09,960
a half. But in New Orleans games, two forty two

338
00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:13,759
and a half really hasn't been high enough. And where

339
00:18:13,799 --> 00:18:17,279
the Lakers are concerned, you know, you said it again,

340
00:18:17,319 --> 00:18:19,160
but we've said it a couple hundred times this year.

341
00:18:19,200 --> 00:18:21,839
The defense just leads a lot to be desired. So

342
00:18:22,039 --> 00:18:24,680
I would fully be on board with over.

343
00:18:24,599 --> 00:18:25,279
Speaker 2: In this game.

344
00:18:25,319 --> 00:18:26,920
Speaker 3: And what looks like a little bit of a back

345
00:18:26,960 --> 00:18:31,039
and forth between these two, I believe I got to

346
00:18:31,079 --> 00:18:33,160
go back and look, but I think New Orleans got

347
00:18:33,799 --> 00:18:37,759
extremely close to this number the other night with the Clippers.

348
00:18:37,920 --> 00:18:41,599
Speaker 2: Uh, it was close to two forty two, if not

349
00:18:41,720 --> 00:18:42,960
more than two forty two.

350
00:18:43,200 --> 00:18:45,480
Speaker 3: It was, Yeah, it was two fifty four as a

351
00:18:45,559 --> 00:18:49,440
matter of fact against the Clippers. So two forty three

352
00:18:49,839 --> 00:18:51,799
here with the Lakers, I could, I could see it

353
00:18:51,839 --> 00:18:55,920
for sure. New Orleans had a day off to do

354
00:18:56,000 --> 00:18:58,200
whatever they wanted to do in LA. Maybe come out

355
00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:00,880
tonight in score some boards and Trey Murphy obviously, like

356
00:19:00,920 --> 00:19:04,519
you said, huge asset to their offense, so I would

357
00:19:04,519 --> 00:19:07,119
play over if anything in that game.

358
00:19:08,680 --> 00:19:11,079
Speaker 1: All right, we can agree on that. I think we

359
00:19:11,079 --> 00:19:15,599
can wrap it up here with that. You know, before

360
00:19:15,640 --> 00:19:17,559
we move the best bets, let's go ahead and remind

361
00:19:17,640 --> 00:19:21,160
everybody that it is five dollars Tuesday. So you can

362
00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:23,759
go to routs page or my page. You'll find a

363
00:19:23,839 --> 00:19:29,000
top play available for just five dollars. And yeah, on

364
00:19:29,039 --> 00:19:31,559
that note, I'm gonna pass it back to you if

365
00:19:31,599 --> 00:19:34,160
I can. Here we go, I'll pass it back to

366
00:19:34,160 --> 00:19:36,599
you Venil. If there's anything else you like promote, feel

367
00:19:36,640 --> 00:19:38,519
free and if you have the best bet, we'd love

368
00:19:38,559 --> 00:19:41,799
to hear it. If you don't, saw good, I'll.

369
00:19:41,640 --> 00:19:43,160
Speaker 2: Get directly the best bet here.

370
00:19:43,200 --> 00:19:46,839
Speaker 3: Today's ski My five dollars play is up has been

371
00:19:46,920 --> 00:19:49,160
up since this morning, so you can catch that.

372
00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:50,559
Speaker 2: It is a college hoop play.

373
00:19:51,559 --> 00:19:54,599
Speaker 3: But for the NBA, the top play that I have

374
00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:58,920
today for myself and for clients was the Miami team

375
00:19:59,039 --> 00:20:02,480
total over one nineteen and a half against Brooklyn. Again,

376
00:20:02,559 --> 00:20:05,839
I stated why, it's pretty simplistic, but it is what

377
00:20:05,960 --> 00:20:09,880
it is. Miami's gonna play greyhound pace Brooklyn doesn't seem

378
00:20:09,880 --> 00:20:12,920
to matter who they put, you know, whose pace they

379
00:20:12,920 --> 00:20:15,480
play or how they play. They've given up a lot

380
00:20:15,519 --> 00:20:18,079
of points. They're oh in seven since the break. So

381
00:20:18,160 --> 00:20:21,519
for me, Miami team total up and over one nineteen

382
00:20:21,559 --> 00:20:22,000
and a half.

383
00:20:23,079 --> 00:20:27,839
Speaker 1: Good stuff from Vino. Yeah, I have not I appreciate you,

384
00:20:27,920 --> 00:20:30,720
Pancho saying watching it all the way from Mexico, definitely

385
00:20:30,799 --> 00:20:31,480
appreciates you.

386
00:20:33,720 --> 00:20:33,880
Speaker 3: Yeah.

387
00:20:33,960 --> 00:20:37,039
Speaker 1: For myself, you know, I have not played NBA yet,

388
00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:40,200
taking my time to play the NBA, but I do

389
00:20:40,319 --> 00:20:44,359
have a top top play in college basketball and we

390
00:20:44,440 --> 00:20:46,759
are fifteen and thirty five on the season, so that

391
00:20:46,920 --> 00:20:49,119
is my five dollars play for the day. If you

392
00:20:49,119 --> 00:20:53,000
would like to be involved, Yeah, we wrap it up,

393
00:20:53,160 --> 00:20:55,279
so Vino, I always appreciate you taking the time to

394
00:20:55,279 --> 00:20:58,319
break the games down with me. That's my process. Sure

395
00:20:58,319 --> 00:21:00,480
we help out some other people out there as well.

396
00:21:00,960 --> 00:21:04,160
Everybody in the chat, we appreciate you. We're all just

397
00:21:04,160 --> 00:21:05,720
trying to help each other get to the window. So

398
00:21:05,799 --> 00:21:08,359
best of luck everybody on all of your action. We

399
00:21:08,400 --> 00:21:10,519
will be back here again tomorrow and we will catch

400
00:21:10,559 --> 00:21:11,079
you all then.