Speaker 1: The date is August twenty six, twenty thirty five, and
Speaker 1: we're going to take a look back to twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: ten years ago and what a wild time that was.
Speaker 1: We'll do this with the help of Bisible. There is
Speaker 1: a myth people have and they believe it. You've been
Speaker 1: taught to believe it that if you have an LLC
Speaker 1: or a corporation, you have protected your personal assets against
Speaker 1: lawsuits or losses at your company. That's a myth for
Speaker 1: many people because you are probably the same thing. Go bisible,
Speaker 1: that's the website, go visible with a Z. Visible will
Speaker 1: tell you if you have that protection and if you don't,
Speaker 1: they'll solve that in seventy s steps. Go bisible dot com.
Speaker 1: Thank you for this look back. God Almighty, thank you
Speaker 1: for the present day and all the things you provide,
Speaker 1: which is in fact everything.
Speaker 2: The Todd Homan Show is one hundred percent disapproved. But
Speaker 2: big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere from the high mountains
Speaker 2: of Free America. Here's the Emerald City exile Todd Herman.
Speaker 1: Today is the day the Lord has made in these
Speaker 1: the times through which God is decided who shall live.
Speaker 1: I know it's not really twenty thirty five. I haven't
Speaker 1: gone completely Biden brains, but I wanted to look at
Speaker 1: their time that we live in with the let's say,
Speaker 1: the fortune of hindsight. Now, can we really do this?
Speaker 1: I think we can because we can take where we're
Speaker 1: at and look back to other times. Let's look back
Speaker 1: twenty years ago. Twenty years ago. If I came to
Speaker 1: and said it will be legal to kidnap children if
Speaker 1: their parents will not pretend their son is an elk Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry a girl, same thing, just as much scientific evidence.
Speaker 1: Twenty years ago, people would have laughed. People did laugh
Speaker 1: ten years ago, ten years ago, when it was going on,
Speaker 1: people said, you're paranoid, that never happens or this. Would
Speaker 1: you look back ten years ago and say, hey, it's
Speaker 1: perfectly natural that in our society we're going to have
Speaker 1: Democrat politicians and Republican politicians both agreeing.
Speaker 3: That crime is a good thing.
Speaker 1: Because there's plenty of Republicans who are riding this wagon
Speaker 1: as well. Crime creates instability, and on a massive basis,
Speaker 1: how many things happened during the COVID era that surprised you,
Speaker 1: even with your cynicism about government. So can we take
Speaker 1: a look at twenty twenty five from a future tense.
Speaker 1: I think that we can we can look at some
Speaker 1: of the things now that strike us as bizarre and
Speaker 1: go forward ten years if things don't change. And in
Speaker 1: regard to crime, at President Trump and I know, look,
Speaker 1: I'm not wild about the National Guard troops rolling into
Speaker 1: the cities.
Speaker 3: I've said it, I'm not wild about it.
Speaker 1: I think that he needs to have permission from that
Speaker 1: States and there needs to be an emergency. And I'm
Speaker 1: much less wild about the fact that gangs own our
Speaker 1: cities and many of our major cities are run by cartels.
Speaker 1: So in two extreme circumstances, I guess I'm going to
Speaker 1: err on the side of the extreme circumstance of bringing
Speaker 1: the Guard in to capture a bunch of these criminals.
Speaker 1: I guess I'm going to air on that side now,
Speaker 1: airing on that could be ten years from now. We've
Speaker 1: got National Guard troops every year everywhere. It could be
Speaker 1: ten years from now. We forget what it's like to
Speaker 1: not see National Guard troops or army troops when you're.
Speaker 3: In the airport.
Speaker 1: If you've been to countries like Mexico, expected you know,
Speaker 1: and that's to our advantage in places like when I
Speaker 1: go to Port of Arta, that's to an advantage for
Speaker 1: me because I'm a tourist and they're not really going
Speaker 1: to go touch me. Now, if you're a citizen there,
Speaker 1: I think it would be pretty tiring. There's seven police forces.
Speaker 1: So in twenty thirty five, would we be looking back
Speaker 1: and going remember when we made that decision to put
Speaker 1: guards just in cities, and now guards are everywhere. That's
Speaker 1: one possibility. The other possibility is this, if the crime
Speaker 1: goes unchecked, we will eventually get to a point where
Speaker 1: we are.
Speaker 3: A low trust society.
Speaker 1: Low trust meaning that people no longer follow the law
Speaker 1: because no one else does. So let's take that point
Speaker 1: of view and let's look at some current stories. One
Speaker 1: just came to my attention, and it's pretty difficult to
Speaker 1: shock me in relation to the separate crunchy of Seattle,
Speaker 1: and it might be difficult to shock you.
Speaker 3: And this is a tough story.
Speaker 1: So if you're watching or listening with young kids, I
Speaker 1: want you to be very very careful about it.
Speaker 3: And I'll tell you about this the second.
Speaker 1: It involves a toddler and a mother and some payments online.
Speaker 1: Obviously that's a tough topic. It's less tough to talk
Speaker 1: about our bodies as adults. There's things our bodies need
Speaker 1: and they don't get. One of the things that you
Speaker 1: need to take care of is your myocarteral health. So
Speaker 1: the myocardia. This is the little tiny energy centers inside
Speaker 1: your cells, and it's what converts fats into energy and
Speaker 1: does other things as well, but that's one of its
Speaker 1: main functions. So if you found yourself getting heavier over
Speaker 1: and it just continues to happen, you can talk about
Speaker 1: hormones and maybe that's worth looking at. I have a
Speaker 1: hormone doc I see once a quarter. You can look
Speaker 1: at your energy levels of course that should be higher probably.
Speaker 3: And your water intake.
Speaker 1: But even with all that, you can end up with
Speaker 1: bad mitochondrial health. How do I know this because it
Speaker 1: happened to me. The guy who drinks three hundred and
Speaker 1: sixty ounces of water every day because I have three
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty grams of protein every day, guy whot
Speaker 1: tracks everything he eats, who exercises pretty vigorously two and
Speaker 1: a half hours a day, five to six days a week.
Speaker 3: So this happened to me.
Speaker 1: So I started to take Bourban breakthrough from my friends
Speaker 1: at Boptimizers. It helps transplant or transport more fatty acids
Speaker 1: into your sales energy centers, and that supports the efficient
Speaker 1: utilization of fat as energy and the result is steadier energy,
Speaker 1: fewer energy dips, and less light night cravings which can
Speaker 1: lead to weight loss. Visit five Commerciers dot com slash
Speaker 1: tood use promo codad to receive fifteen percent off, Subscribe
Speaker 1: for discounts and free gifts and a guaranteed monthly supply.
Speaker 1: That's bobsimizes dot com. Slash Todd. Promo cod todd for
Speaker 1: fifteen percent off Burbean Breakthrough Bobtimizes dot com slash todd.
Speaker 1: Our bodies are one thing. The bodies of children should
Speaker 1: be sacrosanct. The bodies of children should be absolutely sacrosanct.
Speaker 3: If we're looking back and we're playing a game.
Speaker 1: We look back at our society, look back at where
Speaker 1: we're at now, and act like we're in twenty thirty five.
Speaker 1: There's two ways stories like this could go. And again,
Speaker 1: if you're with young kids and they're next to you,
Speaker 1: be careful about this story because it is very, very tough,
Speaker 1: and our job is we're living in twenty thirty five,
Speaker 1: we're looking back. Let's think of the two ways this
Speaker 1: could go. This is a headline from twenty twenty five
Speaker 1: in Seattle, Washington. My friend and former colleague, Jason Ranch
Speaker 1: broke this story headline mom Monster mom accused of raping
Speaker 1: her toddler on camera for money, released by.
Speaker 3: A judge in twenty thirty five.
Speaker 1: As we look back at a headline like this, there's
Speaker 1: two places we could be.
Speaker 3: We could be well, of course she's released.
Speaker 1: That's no longer legal. I mean, love is love. We
Speaker 1: can look forward to that. At twenty thirty five is
Speaker 1: saying wait, wait, are we still talking about sex as
Speaker 1: if it's a crime. I mean, hey, toddler's can enjoy that.
Speaker 1: Who knows that the tiler didn't like it? Maybe the
Speaker 1: tither identifies as a sexual being. That's one path ten
Speaker 1: years from me, you think that's bizarre. Ten years from now,
Speaker 1: if we continue to caudle criminals like this, and we
Speaker 1: continue to push the boundaries of sexuality, who are we
Speaker 1: to say? Or in twenty thirty five, we could look
Speaker 1: back and go do you remember that insane era where
Speaker 1: things like this happen?
Speaker 3: This is Jason's story, a Pierce.
Speaker 1: County judge ordered the release of a mother without bail
Speaker 1: despite accusations that she filmed herself sexually assaulting her two
Speaker 1: year old son for profits.
Speaker 3: Trinity Carol. Wow, what a name. Trinity Carol, a twenty two.
Speaker 1: Year old Edward Edgewood resident, was charged in Pierce County
Speaker 1: Superior Court with rape of a child in the first degree,
Speaker 1: promoting sexual commercial sexual abuse of a minor in animal
Speaker 1: cruelty in the first degree. Gosh, I wonder what police said.
Speaker 1: Carol use Snapchat to send sexual explicit videos to a
Speaker 1: man for payment, which included sexual suspicious videos of her son,
Speaker 1: for what she thought would be a fifty thousand dollars payment.
Speaker 1: She said the Snapchat user asked for a video of
Speaker 1: her changing her son's diaper while fondling him. So she
Speaker 1: provided this service and if Pierce County judge.
Speaker 3: Let her go.
Speaker 1: In twenty thirty five, we can look back at stories
Speaker 1: like this and go, how did we get to that point?
Speaker 1: How did society get to that point? We could study
Speaker 1: it as a bleep or a blip. We could study
Speaker 1: it as an extreme moment. We could study it in
Speaker 1: criminal justice classes as this is what happens when activist
Speaker 1: judges and activist das get purchased and pushed into office
Speaker 1: with the money of people intent on taking down America.
Speaker 3: That was a dark period.
Speaker 1: Twenty twenty five or twenty thirty five, You and I
Speaker 1: old people could be saying, told you so. So when
Speaker 1: President Trump starts rolling the National Guard into these cities,
Speaker 1: is it to stop this happened to two year Old's
Speaker 1: not really, but it's to stop a prevailing notion that
Speaker 1: crime is normal, and that defending crime is now a
Speaker 1: stance that a national political party can take. We don't
Speaker 1: have enough crime, we need more of it. So while
Speaker 1: I can stand in twenty thirty five and say thank
Speaker 1: god President Trump meant it. He sent the national Guard in,
Speaker 1: he cleaned up those cities, and he pulled them out,
Speaker 1: there's been no normalization of that. Do you remember when
Speaker 1: President Trump was willing to do that in twenty thirty five?
Speaker 1: We could look back and we could have had eight
Speaker 1: years of JD vance. Or the media can win on
Speaker 1: this front and make this seem so extreme. This is
Speaker 1: why I'm presenting the things as two extremes. It is
Speaker 1: extreme to roll the National Guard into American cities, and
Speaker 1: we conserned it. She'd admit this because we're all about
Speaker 1: small government, right. Even populists should admit this, because populists
Speaker 1: don't want a big, strong government bullying them around. But
Speaker 1: we also must present the fact that our cities have
Speaker 1: been made into extreme zones. When a cartel or cartel's
Speaker 1: own cities and when criminals know they're not going to
Speaker 1: be punished, that is just as extreme as a national
Speaker 1: Guard rolling in. With one big difference, the National Guard
Speaker 1: is not going to roll into these cities and go
Speaker 1: out and discriminately take lives. They're not going to go
Speaker 1: do dry by shootings. They're not going to traffic human beings.
Speaker 1: They're not going to sexually exploit little children. That's not
Speaker 1: what the National Guard does. They're individual members who can misstep. Sure,
Speaker 1: because we're all broken by sin. We can look in
Speaker 1: twenty thirty five. If we're looking back at twenty twenty five,
Speaker 1: and we could say, man, thank.
Speaker 3: God there was that religious revival.
Speaker 1: Thank god so many people came to Christ, and we
Speaker 1: could look back at what was the backbreaking moment. Maybe
Speaker 1: it was a whole bunch of series of things like
Speaker 1: this with a woman named Trinity as in the Holy
Speaker 1: Trinity apparently doing this to her little boy for money.
Speaker 1: Maybe there were tough cases like this that enough people said, man,
Speaker 1: things have gotten awfully dark. Thank god there was this revival,
Speaker 1: this Christian revove of the country. Thank god that the
Speaker 1: schools changed, or we could look back and go you
Speaker 1: remember when the left broke the back of the churches.
Speaker 1: Now Jesus has said that his church will stand against
Speaker 1: the gate of Gates of Haites. It can't stand against it.
Speaker 1: So it's not going away. But is it going to
Speaker 1: be vibrant in America? Here's another example. If we're at
Speaker 1: a criminal justice class in twenty thirty five and we're
Speaker 1: studying the era of twenty twenty five, I think this
Speaker 1: had be something.
Speaker 3: That might get played.
Speaker 1: This is the dictator of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, and he
Speaker 1: has a point of view on crime. President Trump has
Speaker 1: been talking about bringing the National Guard into Chicago, a
Speaker 1: city where it's not unusual to see eighteen to thirty
Speaker 1: shootings in a weekend, or to see five to seven
Speaker 1: people shot and killed in a weekend.
Speaker 3: This is the dictator of Chicago, Brandon Johnson.
Speaker 4: We cannot incarcerate our way out of violence. We've already
Speaker 4: tried that. If we've ended up the largest prison population
Speaker 4: in the world without solving the problems of crime and violence,
Speaker 4: the addiction on jails and incarceration in this country, we
Speaker 4: have moved past that. It is racist, it is immoral,
Speaker 4: it is unholy, and it is not the way to
Speaker 4: drive violence down.
Speaker 1: So is the argument that incarcerating people drives violence get down?
Speaker 1: And Brandon Johnson was standing there with one of the
Speaker 1: most corrupt dictators of the states in the nation, and
Speaker 1: that's JB.
Speaker 3: Pritzker, part of the disastrous and.
Speaker 1: Truly truly obviously obviously spiritually fallen Pritzker.
Speaker 3: Family, unbelievably corrupt, harmful people.
Speaker 1: Is the argument or was it in twenty twenty five
Speaker 1: that putting people in prison solved violence?
Speaker 3: It solves this.
Speaker 1: When truly violent people go to prison, they only get
Speaker 1: to impart violence upon people in prison, and in that
Speaker 1: case it can be easily stopped because they're within reach
Speaker 1: of corrections officers. They do not get to go out
Speaker 1: and parted upon society as a whole. And if they
Speaker 1: continue to do that in prison, and they continue to
Speaker 1: act out violently and attack people, they can be put
Speaker 1: in solitary confinement for all but an hour a day,
Speaker 1: and in that case they can try to assault guards,
Speaker 1: but they're not going to be able to assault fellow inmates.
Speaker 1: This is a game that was played in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: five the shifting of the goal posts, and the goal
Speaker 1: post here that was shifted was we think putting people
Speaker 1: in prison is going to stop human beings from being violence.
Speaker 1: But here's what hasn't been tried in Chicago, and maybe
Speaker 1: in twenty thirty five we can look back at this.
Speaker 1: Do you remember when President Trump sent the National Guards
Speaker 1: into the cities and they found out that eighty percent
Speaker 1: of crime is carried out by twenty percent of criminals,
Speaker 1: and eighty percent of violent crime is carried out by
Speaker 1: ten percent of criminals. And when President Trump rolled the
Speaker 1: Guard in and they took those people off the streets
Speaker 1: and they took the guns away from the people who
Speaker 1: weren't legally allowed to have them, violence did go down.
Speaker 1: Because what Brandon Johnson's doing in Chicago, it was the
Speaker 1: same thing that they're doing in Portland and the.
Speaker 3: Separate countries of Seattle.
Speaker 1: They're letting child rapists go in Seattle, They're letting gangsters
Speaker 1: go in Chicago.
Speaker 3: So from a twenty thirty five.
Speaker 1: Criminal justice class, we can look back at this moment
Speaker 1: and say, there was a belief among leftists that the
Speaker 1: only way to solve crime and violence was.
Speaker 3: What what would be their theory? What would we look.
Speaker 1: Back at twenty thirty five and defend their theory based
Speaker 1: upon non compliance, letting people go.
Speaker 3: What is their theory on crime? What was it?
Speaker 1: As we look back from twenty thirty five, we look
Speaker 1: at twenty twenty five, what was the operating theory of
Speaker 1: the Democrat parties that relates to crime? It didn't exist.
Speaker 1: What did exist was an overwhelming desire to call to
Speaker 1: criminals and to have more of it. Brandon Johnson, the
Speaker 1: dictator of Chicago, said that it's racist to put people
Speaker 1: in prison for committing cri that it's racist, meaning of
Speaker 1: course that it's just black people are put in prison,
Speaker 1: which of course isn't true. And again, if we're looking
Speaker 1: back from our perspective of twenty thirty five, two separate
Speaker 1: ways we could go. Jimmember when President Trump put those
Speaker 1: twenty percent of people who committed eighty percent of crimes
Speaker 1: in prison and then came and announced a refurbishing of
Speaker 1: the schools that the federal government will no longer allow
Speaker 1: the disappearance of special classes for people who achieve that
Speaker 1: the federal governments no longer going to allow racial segregation
Speaker 1: in the schools where black kids are given special disciplinary waivers,
Speaker 1: where black kids can't be expelled, where they can't be
Speaker 1: sent out of school, they can't be suspended. Only white
Speaker 1: kids or Asian kids can do that. And if you
Speaker 1: doubt me, this is what happens in the separate countries.
Speaker 1: These are literal policies, Jiman. President Trump took away federal
Speaker 1: funding from schools that did that, and we communicated to
Speaker 1: black kids that we expect the same from you as.
Speaker 3: White kids, because you're capable of it, because you're human beings.
Speaker 3: We're all broken by sin.
Speaker 1: But nothing about having dark skin or a higher melanine
Speaker 1: level means that you're inclined to crime. Nothing, nothing about
Speaker 1: that means that you cannot live by the rules. We
Speaker 1: expect it, just like we expect it from white kids.
Speaker 1: When President Trump created that and pushed it into schools
Speaker 1: by threatening federal dollars and taking them away, and when
Speaker 1: some state officials followed up with some positive incentives, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, we saw this change somewhere around twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five or in twenty thirty five. We can look
Speaker 1: back and say President Trump gave it a shot, it
Speaker 1: didn't work, or it wasn't allowed to work. Which one
Speaker 1: do you think is more likely? It doesn't work or
Speaker 1: it's not allowed to work. The Democrats are setting up
Speaker 1: it's not allowed to work from twenty thirty five. We
Speaker 1: could also look back at a past that changed racially.
Speaker 1: Do you remember when Barack Hussein Obama is running for president,
Speaker 1: is supposedly the first black president, that he was going
Speaker 1: to heal racial divides. This is one of the big
Speaker 1: pitches that having a black president would heal a racial divide.
Speaker 1: I remember liberal friends of mine who worked at Microsoft
Speaker 1: celebrating this. I'll never forget the night he was elected
Speaker 1: seeing and it wasn't social media because that wasn't a
Speaker 1: big deal. Then it was emails amongst friends. There were
Speaker 1: some notes on Facebook. I take it, no, there wasn't.
Speaker 1: Actually at that point, Facebook was just still for young people.
Speaker 1: It was emails among friends. It was posts at work.
Speaker 1: We had shack groups at work, and I'll never forget
Speaker 1: seeing managers at Microsoft posting internally. I'm excited for the
Speaker 1: first time because racial healing is here. Well, Barack Obama
Speaker 1: didn't want racial healing. He was an Olynskyite divider from
Speaker 1: the very beginning. That's how he was trained. So we
Speaker 1: saw what happened under him. If out of Sawn he'd
Speaker 1: look like Trayvon Martin, the police acted stupidly.
Speaker 3: Hispanics need to.
Speaker 1: Need to punish their enemies in twenty thirty five, look
Speaker 1: back at a turning point. We could look back that
Speaker 1: President Trump did arrest the twenty percent of criminals who
Speaker 1: charged who cause eighty percent of the crime, That we
Speaker 1: did begin to go after corrupt judges, that we did
Speaker 1: arrest corrupt public officials and frog march them, and there
Speaker 1: was a change because we stopped being a low trust
Speaker 1: society or what was becoming a low trust society. We
Speaker 1: could also look back at humor. Maybe there's a resurgence
Speaker 1: of humor that you can have ratio humor. I wish
Speaker 1: I knew this black comedian's name, but listen to what
Speaker 1: he says, or watch it and see if this doesn't
Speaker 1: relate more to society today. If this isn't a better
Speaker 1: critique of what's going on racially, then you'd see even
Speaker 1: on serious news channels like MSNBC. I'm sorry, ms now
Speaker 1: that's the new brand.
Speaker 4: Press I saw in the CNN. Nobody knows black plug
Speaker 4: like white winsor.
Speaker 5: I thought I was a good life until like.
Speaker 1: It's a great bet waking up to realize that you
Speaker 1: didn't know you're oppressed until a white lady came along
Speaker 1: and told you. From a perspective of twenty thirty five,
Speaker 1: we could look back and say, do you remember when
Speaker 1: President Trump killed the soft bigotry of low expectations? Do
Speaker 1: you remember what he did that in the schools by saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: there's going to be advanced placement courses if you take
Speaker 1: federal dollars, we're going to reward advanced placement kids who
Speaker 1: do well in school. We're going to have one set
Speaker 1: of disciplinary rules. We're going to reward kids with college discounts.
Speaker 1: President Trump could put a bunch of pressure on the
Speaker 1: big universities. You'd take all these federal dollars saying hey,
Speaker 1: not just scholarships discounts, kids who come from tough areas
Speaker 1: are going to get a discount. Or you can just
Speaker 1: stop taking federal dollars. You choose, Hey, Harvard stop taking dollars.
Speaker 3: They can't.
Speaker 1: They screwed up their finances too bad. They're too leveraged
Speaker 1: into private capital.
Speaker 3: They can't. They can't walk away from federal dollars. Or
Speaker 3: we could look back.
Speaker 1: And say we let the mockingbird medium make President Trump's
Speaker 1: move quote against the cities into the extreme. I'm going
Speaker 1: to be communicating to my friends who are liberal and
Speaker 1: family members who are liberal, that I am uncomfortable with
Speaker 1: the troops rolling in.
Speaker 3: I don't like the way it looks.
Speaker 1: I am praying that it is not normalized, that it
Speaker 1: is not President's Trump's plan to carry this.
Speaker 3: Out throughout the country. I don't think it is.
Speaker 1: And I'm also going to communicate I am sick of
Speaker 1: Democrat mayors and Democrat governors being allowed to allow crime
Speaker 1: to absolutely run rampant and to set up the cartels
Speaker 1: to have supply lines. They have little supply lines.
Speaker 3: Think of this.
Speaker 1: They've got soldiers selling drugs, They've got soldiers delivering drugs
Speaker 1: in the separate countries like Seattle. They are not arrested
Speaker 1: for DUIs. If you utter the phrase you're here arlegally,
Speaker 1: you're letting go. They are operated on and cash brought
Speaker 1: in and out. That's a supply chain. The drugs are
Speaker 1: brought in, the money's brought out, that's a supply chain.
Speaker 1: The human flesh is brought in and brought out. That's
Speaker 1: a supply chain. That is a military operation. The cartels
Speaker 1: are militarized. When the cartels, Russian, Honduran, Mexican, Chinese cartels
Speaker 1: have supply chains in and out of our country. They
Speaker 1: have surveillance in our country, Alex was told me the
Speaker 1: other day. Then in Los Angeles there's these live streamers
Speaker 1: set up, and there are not people being charged with
Speaker 1: the job of going down and taking down these livestream
Speaker 1: cameras because they've figured out, oh, this isn't social news,
Speaker 1: this isn't citizen journalism. These are cartels running ops to
Speaker 1: identify the cops. I've told you that Antifa has facial
Speaker 1: recognition software on cops that they.
Speaker 3: Stole out of Seattle.
Speaker 1: They stole the faces of cops when they got to
Speaker 1: take over a police building. They're militarized. The cartels are
Speaker 1: military units within our cities. President Trump as bringing the
Speaker 1: National Guard in to meet force with force. He should
Speaker 1: be communicating this. It's the cartels who are mostly benefiting
Speaker 1: from this crime. And if we were to look back
Speaker 1: from twenty thirty five, we could look back at a
Speaker 1: time where President Trump killed the cartel presidence in our country.
Speaker 1: Praise God, were that the case. A lot of things
Speaker 1: to praise God for. If we'll just take a time
Speaker 1: and step back at this.
Speaker 3: If you are able to.
Speaker 1: Think about retirement, if you're able to ponder retirement, Praise
Speaker 1: God that you've got the ability to do that. Praise
Speaker 1: God for the nest egg you have. And then also
Speaker 1: remember that we're told time and again to be good
Speaker 1: stewards of our money, and we're told to seek wise counsel.
Speaker 1: I'm giving you an opportunity to get free wise counsel
Speaker 1: in three separate meetings with my friend Zach Abraham, chief
Speaker 1: investment Officer Bulwark Capital Management.
Speaker 3: Three times.
Speaker 1: He'll meet with you. No time is there and any
Speaker 1: obligation in any one of the meetings. If you don't
Speaker 1: like Zach, you don't like the approach, you just bow out.
Speaker 1: No one's going to feel bad, No one should. The
Speaker 1: first meeting, Zach's going to talk with you and you
Speaker 1: and he are going to have a quick visit you
Speaker 1: and your spouse.
Speaker 3: If you like.
Speaker 1: You can be in person, on video, on the phone,
Speaker 1: whatever you want. And you're just figuring out if you
Speaker 1: like each other. Because Zach is an active manager of portfolios.
Speaker 1: He actively manages every portfolio he takes in that can
Speaker 1: reduce risk and volatility. And you're going to want to
Speaker 1: chat with him. You might want to say, hey, I
Speaker 1: don't get it. Why do we make that move right?
Speaker 1: And so in one of your quarterly discussions with him,
Speaker 1: you can ask him or you pop him an email, Hey, just.
Speaker 3: Tell me this.
Speaker 1: The second meeting is really going through your retirement plans,
Speaker 1: and what Zach going to look at is are you
Speaker 1: being overcharged? Are you exposed to too much risk? Are
Speaker 1: you being charged fees that you shouldn't be charged? Is
Speaker 1: your financial advisor a fiduciary? Are there required legally to
Speaker 1: put your financial interest above their own? And on the
Speaker 1: third meeting, again no obligation there. You come back and
Speaker 1: tell you either you're in good stead, stay where you're at,
Speaker 1: go retire like you're doing, or they're going to offer
Speaker 1: you a change. You register for this very very easily,
Speaker 1: for this free service. It's Know Your riskpodcast dot com.
Speaker 1: Just head over there. Know Your Risk podcast dot Com
Speaker 1: Investment advisor services off through Treek Financial LLC and sec
Speaker 1: rends for investment advisor investments involved risk and are not
Speaker 1: guarantee past performance, isn't guarantee future results Truck twenty five.
Speaker 3: That'sh two five two. If we were in twenty thirty.
Speaker 1: Five America and we were looking back, we could look
Speaker 1: back about a discussion regards slavery in a fascinating comparison
Speaker 1: that people on the left have started to offer, particularly
Speaker 1: when they're talking to a black female officeholder who's the
Speaker 1: Lieutenant governor named wins Sears.
Speaker 3: Let's start with a discussion of slavery.
Speaker 1: Yep, that topic, because in twenty thirty five we can
Speaker 1: look back and say, do you remember when the Democrats
Speaker 1: got away and the left got away with pretending there's
Speaker 1: a new form of slavery even as they ignored slavery
Speaker 1: around the globe or things could change.
Speaker 5: Let's be very clear. The reason there is no slavery
Speaker 5: in the world today. I mean, there's a lot of
Speaker 5: slavery in the world today, but in parts of the
Speaker 5: world where there's no slavery is because the British Empire
Speaker 5: ended it. That's why there is no slavery.
Speaker 1: So this is a production of the Qatar Foundation, and
Speaker 1: it appears to be going on in the Middle East,
Speaker 1: and that doesn't seem to be a very popular point
Speaker 1: of view in the Middle East, where there still is slavery.
Speaker 5: That is well, the fact that you are uneducated about
Speaker 5: history doesn't mean it's funny. So let me educate you. Now,
Speaker 5: Let me educate you. Now, let me educate you.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 5: I know that the work narrative and the anti Western
Speaker 5: narrative on slavery. Well, you're not practicing free speech very well,
Speaker 5: are you. You're not practicing free speech very well, are you?
Speaker 3: Mum?
Speaker 5: And I say something you don't like. You're not practicing
Speaker 5: free speech very well?
Speaker 3: Are you saying?
Speaker 5: I thought you were all about free speech? How about
Speaker 5: you let me finish my point. Here's the point, and
Speaker 5: then I'm going to now and then I was the
Speaker 5: work narrative and the anti Western narrative on slavery is
Speaker 5: there was no slavery, and then the British or the
Speaker 5: Americans came along and they started slavery. Slaves were the
Speaker 5: first good that were ever traded between human beings. Ever,
Speaker 5: they were the first good ever traded. Native Americans had slaves,
Speaker 5: Ottomans had slaves, African had slaves. Everybody had slaves. The
Speaker 5: reason there is no slavery in the West is the
Speaker 5: British Empire, having practiced slavery for a long time like
Speaker 5: everybody else.
Speaker 3: Ended it.
Speaker 5: Not only that, not only that the British Empire then
Speaker 5: he spent in a tremendous amount of blood and treasure
Speaker 5: to force the Middle Eastern slave traders, with the Transaharan
Speaker 5: slave trade being much worse than the Transatlantic slave in
Speaker 5: terms of the number of people who were killed, in
Speaker 5: terms of the way that they were bringing, in terms of.
Speaker 3: How long it lasted.
Speaker 5: It was much worse, and we spent a tremendous amount
Speaker 5: of blood and treasure to stop it. That's the true
Speaker 5: history of slavery.
Speaker 1: Unbelievably brilliant approach, dealing with the Heckler's unbelievable brilliant approach,
Speaker 1: just continuing to speak, ignoring the so called markerator. Unbelievably
Speaker 1: great job. America followed in suit. America came and ended
Speaker 1: slavery here, not perfectly, not quickly enough. And then the
Speaker 1: Jim Crow came along after that, again not perfect, not
Speaker 1: quick enough to bring back the vote or to bring
Speaker 1: the vote to black people into women. Not quick enough,
Speaker 1: but it happened. So in twenty thirty five we can
Speaker 1: look back. We can say, remember when the Democrats tried
Speaker 1: a stupid thing. This is a sign that is going
Speaker 1: on being held by leftists around the country. And in
Speaker 1: this case, they're approaching a black officeholder Lieutenant governor Win
Speaker 1: some seers South Carolina and sid Enter North Carolina, North Carolina. Hey,
Speaker 1: win some If so called trans can't share your bathroom,
Speaker 1: then blacks can't share my water fountain. In twenty thirty five,
Speaker 1: can look back and remember when they tried that. They
Speaker 1: tried to make people who are gender dysphoric, or gender
Speaker 1: rebellious or gender denying into slaves. Now you can't deny
Speaker 1: being black. I mean you can, I guess, because we
Speaker 1: can pretend to be anything. And yes, you're born a certain.
Speaker 3: So called race. You can choose to adopt that, to
Speaker 3: magnify it, to ignore it, to deemphasize it in your life,
Speaker 3: to make it just part of you, or you can
Speaker 3: make it your whole person. Might advise the latter, make
Speaker 3: it part.
Speaker 1: Of you, but you can't change it. An attitude towards
Speaker 1: your body can change. Everybody knows this, So why are
Speaker 1: they holding the signs? Because they're aware that there's a
Speaker 1: twenty thirty five around the corner. They're aware of the
Speaker 1: slippage of time. They know that twenty thirty five might
Speaker 1: be an era where we look back and say, remember
Speaker 1: the trans trials. Do you remember all those former so
Speaker 1: called doctors and nurses put on trial in the United
Speaker 1: States of America for what they did to kids?
Speaker 3: Do you remember the testimonies of the families.
Speaker 1: In twenty thirty five, we could be looking back at
Speaker 1: a massive documentary about the jailing, the taking of assets
Speaker 1: from doctors like this when they finally admit the financial
Speaker 1: ties to this, the billions and hundreds of billions of
Speaker 1: dollars bet on this by people like the Pritzker family.
Speaker 3: I mentioned JB. Pritzker earlier.
Speaker 1: His family went all in on so called trans warfare
Speaker 1: with the Human Rights campaign where his brother is on
Speaker 1: the board, his brother who pretends to be a woman,
Speaker 1: Oh and by the way, pretends to be only partly human,
Speaker 1: he's a transhumanist. Or in twenty thirty five, we can
Speaker 1: look back and say, remember when they got away with that,
Speaker 1: and they pretended that being gendered as fork is the
Speaker 1: same thing as being a slave. There's lots of ways
Speaker 1: to enslave people. One of them is through education or
Speaker 1: lack of it. In twenty thirty five meanway, we might
Speaker 1: look back at a time where President Trump addressed the
Speaker 1: school situation, after he addressed a national guard situation in
Speaker 1: the eighty percent of criminals who take on or commit
Speaker 1: or twenty percent of criminals who commit eighty percent of
Speaker 1: the crime. We might look back at that time and say,
Speaker 1: remember when they cleaned out Chicago and Saint Louis and
Speaker 1: New York and Washington, d C. And then they came
Speaker 1: in for programs for kids. All kids of all races
Speaker 1: are going to be expected to perform the same way.
Speaker 1: All kids of all races are going to have the
Speaker 1: same disciplinary standards all kids of all races can achieve.
Speaker 1: And President Trump put this pressure on the colleges, the
Speaker 1: big universities. Hey, it doesn't need to be scholarships. It
Speaker 1: can be discounts or this. If you take federal money,
Speaker 1: you're going to provide a form of your education for free.
Speaker 1: You're going to put classroom cameras in every single classroom,
Speaker 1: and kids who can't.
Speaker 3: Afford to go to your school, will be able to do.
Speaker 1: This from home, and they're going to be able to
Speaker 1: take tests and quizzes from home.
Speaker 3: They can't go meet with the professors.
Speaker 1: They don't get the advantage of an in class experience,
Speaker 1: they don't get the dorm rooms, they don't get the meals,
Speaker 1: but they get the education for free, and they get
Speaker 1: to take tests and quizzes from people who grade those
Speaker 1: outside of the university system. In twenty thirty five, we
Speaker 1: could look back and say Wow, massive change, or we
Speaker 1: could look at more stories like this.
Speaker 3: There's lots of ways to enslave people.
Speaker 1: A young woman thinks she's been freed because she got
Speaker 1: to go to college, but in fact she's been enslaved.
Speaker 3: I'll show you this in a second as well.
Speaker 1: Got a note this morning from a dear friend of ours,
Speaker 1: very very very dear friend, one of our closest friends
Speaker 1: in Idaho, and she's dealing with something that's bone on bone.
Speaker 1: So she'd asked about Renew. This is something Renew Healthcare
Speaker 1: could help with, So I would ask her to go
Speaker 1: to join stem cell talks dot com. We're putting on
Speaker 1: a free live webinar coming up on September eleventh at
Speaker 1: eleven am Pacific.
Speaker 3: I'm going to be there. Doctor Navarro is a great doctor.
Speaker 1: For renew He's a spinal specialist, specialist on regenitive therapy.
Speaker 3: He's going to be there.
Speaker 1: If you have questions about stem cells, For instance, can
Speaker 1: it help regenerate the tissue in your body, in your knees,
Speaker 1: the cartilage. The answer is yes, it depends on how
Speaker 1: much tissue is there. Go ask your a question at
Speaker 1: stem cell talks dot com. Can it really help with
Speaker 1: a rectile dysfunction? The answer is yes. You can ask
Speaker 1: your specific question about how long you've had it, how
Speaker 1: much you've suffered with it? At Joined stem cell talks
Speaker 1: dot com. Can it help with anything that is let's
Speaker 1: say aesthetic, Yes, instead of having bovine stuff shot in
Speaker 1: this is not bovine.
Speaker 3: What is it cowstuff?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: No, it is botox. Is at cowtoxin shot up in
Speaker 1: your face for wrinkles? How about if you just revitalize
Speaker 1: your skin?
Speaker 3: It works that way as well. Take your specific.
Speaker 1: Questions, submit them at join stem cell talks dot com.
Speaker 1: We're gonna answer as many as we can. We're gonna
Speaker 1: look at side by side results of stem cells versus Therapy,
Speaker 1: and everybody who attends and goes through the entire live
Speaker 1: free webinar is entered to win.
Speaker 3: A free week stay at the beautiful.
Speaker 1: Hotel Mio in Nueva Vorarta, just right outside of portovirtof
Speaker 1: stayed there three times.
Speaker 3: It's extraordinary.
Speaker 1: It's joined stem cell talks dot com. I'll see you
Speaker 1: at the free live webinar on the eleventh of September
Speaker 1: eleven am Pacific joined stem cell.
Speaker 3: Talks dot com.
Speaker 1: So there's lots of ways to be enslaved, and this
Speaker 1: is a very clever way to enslave a girl. So
Speaker 1: she is living the dream of attending college, and she
Speaker 1: thinks she's free, but she's been enslaved. And listen to
Speaker 1: this local news report and listen very very closely at
Speaker 1: what the catch is to the story.
Speaker 6: Do you ever think you'd be going to college here?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 7: Never, never, many years.
Speaker 6: In some ways, Alicia Ortiz is living an American dream.
Speaker 6: The nineteen year old began her freshman year at the
Speaker 6: University of Connecticut in Hartford this fall. She's excited to
Speaker 6: study public policy. The culmination of hard work. After moving
Speaker 6: north from Puerto Rico as a child, do you remember
Speaker 6: when you first came to Connecticut.
Speaker 7: Yes, I remember. I was very nervous, but I know
Speaker 7: it was gonna be i'm better opportunities for me to learn.
Speaker 6: But Alicia says those opportunities never came to fruition even today.
Speaker 6: Could you read this or would it take you a
Speaker 6: long time?
Speaker 7: Is in passive seeing were anywhere?
Speaker 6: Alicia graduated from the Hartford Public School System last year,
Speaker 6: but she says today she is illiterate. She still doesn't
Speaker 6: know how to read or write. When she was in
Speaker 6: early education.
Speaker 7: They would just either tell me who stay in a
Speaker 7: corner and slee or just draw pictures flowers for them.
Speaker 1: She graduated with honors from the Connecticut Government school System
Speaker 1: and she can't read or write. And she's been accepted
Speaker 1: at the University of Connecticut and she's enslaved until she
Speaker 1: learns to read or write. There's knowledge she'll never have
Speaker 1: in ways she'll never communicate or by the way. Her
Speaker 1: specialty her focus in college, she's studying public policy, which
Speaker 1: is perfect because public policy in twenty twenty five was
Speaker 1: about how do you look on camera? What is your
Speaker 1: SOB story? How do you connect with people emotionally? What
Speaker 1: are you willing to do on camera? What extreme thing
Speaker 1: you're willing to say? What extreme position are you willing
Speaker 1: to take? How much a victim are you willing to be?
Speaker 1: She could be hailed and I could see it happening
Speaker 1: as the first illiterate member of the United States Congress.
Speaker 3: I could see that happening. Could you?
Speaker 1: In twenty thirty five, we could look back and say,
Speaker 1: remember when they started to allow people who couldn't read
Speaker 1: or write to become lawyers? I mean that couldn't happen,
Speaker 1: and yet graduated high school with honors, is in college
Speaker 1: cannot read or write.
Speaker 3: So again, it's a choice this President.
Speaker 1: Trump and the let's say, doing away with the Department
Speaker 1: of Education, but using federal dollars to force states to
Speaker 1: do the right thing. Do we kill the soft bigotry
Speaker 1: of little expectations that has enslaved that girl? Would you
Speaker 1: agree to enslaved her? In the meantime, we can do
Speaker 1: another comparison. Another federal judge recently blocked Christy Nome's move
Speaker 1: to terminate temporary status for Nicaragua, Honduran, and Nepali immigrants,
Speaker 1: and he found that the cancelation was likely.
Speaker 3: That the policy was likely rooted in racism. Did he
Speaker 3: have proof of that?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 3: Did he have anything to indicate that that might be proof? No,
Speaker 3: he said, it's likely.
Speaker 1: In this case, we have people who've been brought into
Speaker 1: our country, and you can make a very very data
Speaker 1: driven argument that they've taken jobs from native native born
Speaker 1: Americans or citizens of America, that they've taken jobs from
Speaker 1: citizens of America.
Speaker 3: You can make that argument. You can make the argument
Speaker 3: that they've taken resources from citizens of America, and you
Speaker 3: can make that based on data. You could say, we
Speaker 3: feel like it's racist, But there is anyone making that
Speaker 3: claim about that girl? You think she's the only one.
Speaker 3: Was it because she was especially.
Speaker 1: Sweet and winsome that they did that for her or
Speaker 1: to her? We could look back in twenty thirty five
Speaker 1: and say, wow, remember when there was the religious revival,
Speaker 1: Remember when all those people came to Christ and began
Speaker 1: to understand that, in God's eyes were all the least
Speaker 1: of these. Do you remember when there was that change
Speaker 1: in policy. We began to understand that we have a
Speaker 1: country to steward that God gave us with these enormous resources,
Speaker 1: And do you remember when there was this change and
Speaker 1: we became willing to do the hard thing to choose
Speaker 1: Christian pain. What what it mean by choosing Christian pain?
Speaker 1: Being a society that allows girls like that to graduate
Speaker 1: into college and into jobs is painful. Speaking truth to her,
Speaker 1: saying honey, you can't be, you can't go study public policy, you.
Speaker 3: Can't read or write. It might not feel good, but
Speaker 3: it's honest. It's not lying.
Speaker 1: You're choosing Christian pain. You're speaking to her out of
Speaker 1: truth and love. We could look back at a time
Speaker 1: like that and things would have changed, or we could
Speaker 1: look back and say, remember, we let them get away
Speaker 1: with that. One of the things about President Trump is
Speaker 1: he's not letting people get away with stuff. One other
Speaker 1: thing about him is he seems to have a true,
Speaker 1: abiding love for America in all of its quirky wonderfulness.
Speaker 1: Because America does have a quirky wonderfulness. Particular if you're
Speaker 1: someone who's never visited our country. There was just a
Speaker 1: little incident that happened with a dude and a boat
Speaker 1: and some visitors, and it speaks to one of the
Speaker 1: differences in America, and it's a difference that we should maintain.
Speaker 3: I'm going to offer you a difference in your.
Speaker 1: Lifestyle on a day to day basis, and it's also
Speaker 1: a chance to do something very very much in line
Speaker 1: with building the Kingdom of Eavan. I'm going to ask
Speaker 1: you to change the soap that you use on your body,
Speaker 1: but only after you try Allan soaps. Allan's is made
Speaker 1: in America. It's all natural. It's made by a family
Speaker 1: with three generations of soap making expertise. And Alan the
Speaker 1: young man who is the chief soap officer and works
Speaker 1: there on a daily basis.
Speaker 3: He's been through eighteen operations.
Speaker 1: He's effectively nonverbal because of his placement on the autism spectrum.
Speaker 1: Other autism spectrum communicates that he and Ian, his brother,
Speaker 1: who were there, they're going to lose their dad. John,
Speaker 1: who runs the company and started to employ his sons,
Speaker 1: is dying. John has decided to not fight. He knows
Speaker 1: he's going to the Lord. This has been a long battle.
Speaker 1: He's been through a ton of medical battles and in
Speaker 1: this point he's ready to go to the Lord. I'm
Speaker 1: asking you to do this as a Christian or as
Speaker 1: a good person. Try the soap and if it is excellent,
Speaker 1: or it's at least as good as the soap your
Speaker 1: purchase now from some big company who doesn't care about
Speaker 1: all lives mattering. If it is not your quality standard,
Speaker 1: never bite again. If it meets your quality standard and
Speaker 1: you like the mission, please become a subscriber as soon
Speaker 1: as possible. I say this because John is passing on
Speaker 1: the management of Allan's to his wife, so that Ian
Speaker 1: and Allen can continue to have a place to work
Speaker 1: and you can continue to have access to soap that
Speaker 1: is all natural, made in America, in gentle on the skin.
Speaker 1: It's alansoaps dot com slash Todd. President Trump seems to
Speaker 1: have a unique love for America, and I think for
Speaker 1: real Americans that is, non shiny shoes, non elites. I
Speaker 1: don't know how he has this, given the fact that
Speaker 1: President Trump was absolutely born with a silver spoon, not
Speaker 1: just in his mouth, but in every hand and on
Speaker 1: every foot. He had all those advantages. Maybe it's because
Speaker 1: he loves building and he spent time around people who build.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's because he likes the idea of being a
Speaker 1: tough man, a tough guy, so he's been around guys
Speaker 1: who are hard men. There's something about President Trump that
Speaker 1: ties him to real Americana And it's not a racist thing,
Speaker 1: far from it.
Speaker 3: It's an America thing. If you've ever had an.
Speaker 1: Opportunity to show people who've never really been to our
Speaker 1: country something about America, what would you choose. Well, a
Speaker 1: couple from the UK got to see America from a
Speaker 1: point of view that most people in the UK never see.
Speaker 1: It's not going to be that new to you, but
Speaker 1: it was very, very new to them.
Speaker 3: First time I've ever seen that.
Speaker 6: Really came here looking for an alligate.
Speaker 5: I've never seen one before.
Speaker 3: You don't mind, so guys shuts overjoyed this wind blowing
Speaker 3: his face back, fishing out of the rivers. It's utterly beautiful.
Speaker 3: Hey wow, little alcohol in the boats. That can't be real.
Speaker 3: Oh taking shots from the is that whiskey? I had
Speaker 3: his old rope swing?
Speaker 2: What was that?
Speaker 3: He was naked. I've never shot a gun in my life. Okay,
Speaker 3: right after the whiskey, and yeah, that's that's safe shooting
Speaker 3: across the river where you can't see in the trees.
Speaker 3: That's some safe shooting. Maybe no backstop, good check for bodies.
Speaker 2: This has been one of the most amazing is in
Speaker 2: my lives. These are some of the greatest people in
Speaker 2: the world.
Speaker 1: In twenty thirty five, we can look back at a renaissance.
Speaker 1: We can look back at a president who is willing
Speaker 1: to do some things that seem very extreme, and they
Speaker 1: are rolling the National Guard troops into the cities. Is extreme,
Speaker 1: let's admit it. And the cartels are militarized organizations. Paramilitary
Speaker 1: at least, this supply chains in and out of our country.
Speaker 1: It's military on military.
Speaker 3: They benefit from the crime, They benefit from cops having
Speaker 3: to concentrate on street crime and.
Speaker 1: On the destable design distabilizing crimes rather than the drug crimes.
Speaker 1: I hope that they'll begin to communicate this. Maybe they
Speaker 1: just don't want the cartels to know that they know
Speaker 1: that we know. I hope they'll communicate it. We also
Speaker 1: can look back at a time where President Trump put
Speaker 1: pressure on the colleges in the schools to stop the
Speaker 1: segregation going on in schools. Segregation like that Hispanic girl
Speaker 1: graduating with honors though she can't read. She's in college
Speaker 1: and she can't read. There's lots of President Trump could do.
Speaker 1: And in twenty thirty five, I hope we look back
Speaker 1: and say, thank God he did it.
Speaker 3: This is the Todd Hermannshaw. Please go, be well, be strong,
Speaker 3: be kind, and make a decision today to think about
Speaker 3: your eternal future. You think twenty thirty five is a
Speaker 3: long time away, how about a trillion years. Choose Jesus
Speaker 3: and choose attorney to do with him. I hope you
Speaker 3: get to spend time with your loved ones today, as
Speaker 3: I will my beloved wife