Speaker 1: In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a
Speaker 1: revolutionary act. It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Wednesday, the fourth of
Speaker 2: February of Our Lord twenty twenty six. Today we're going
Speaker 2: to take a look at the Trump regime. Caught and
Speaker 2: yet another attack on the Second Amendment. But in Washington State,
Speaker 2: in New York, we have a so called gun control
Speaker 2: law that is going to cast a much larger shadow
Speaker 2: of prohibition on a lot of things. So we're going
Speaker 2: to take a look at that. And in Epstein world,
Speaker 2: things are starting to come together. It's not just the
Speaker 2: espionage networks. It's also the financial networks and the connections
Speaker 2: that are inside of these documents that is really key.
Speaker 2: The connections to pandemics and how to profit from them,
Speaker 2: and the connection to the great taking and how to
Speaker 2: profit from taking everything from everybody, folks. They have laid
Speaker 2: the foundation since the mid nineteen nineties for this. You
Speaker 2: will own nothing, and of course we're not going to
Speaker 2: be happy about it, but they've been laying the foundation
Speaker 2: for that for a very very long time. And Epstein's emails,
Speaker 2: we got a great deal about this because this guy
Speaker 2: was at the very center of all this financial corruption. Surprise,
Speaker 2: We'll be right back. Well, we're going to begin with
Speaker 2: some of the news updates here. Kind of interesting when
Speaker 2: you look at this great replacement thing that's out there.
Speaker 2: Of course, that was just a conspiracy theory, right, yeah,
Speaker 2: kind of like Jade Helmer is just a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 2: Well not actually, and we can see how it's rolling out.
Speaker 2: And on the left you had an individual who was
Speaker 2: a Spanish politician who openly embraced all of this, saying
Speaker 2: I can't wait to replace this country of fascists and
Speaker 2: racists that's in Spain, and who she wanted to replace
Speaker 2: them with. She said, the immigrants radicalize people. Please don't
Speaker 2: leave us alone with so many right wingers. And of
Speaker 2: course we do want them to vote, and of course
Speaker 2: we have achieved papers regularization already. We're going for the
Speaker 2: nationality to change the laws so that they can vote.
Speaker 2: Of course, I hope replacement theory. Hopefully we can sweep
Speaker 2: right wingers and races of this country with immigrant people,
Speaker 2: with hard working people. Of course, I want there to
Speaker 2: be a replacement, replacement of right wingers, replacement of racists,
Speaker 2: replacement of scoundrels, and we can do it with the
Speaker 2: working people of this country. And she gets a standing ovation.
Speaker 2: Whatever your skin color, right, all comrades, the working people
Speaker 2: of the world, unite. Blah blah blah. Somebody said, let
Speaker 2: me fix that for you. This is what it looks like.
Speaker 2: They did an ai that replaced her and these people
Speaker 2: standing up, put them in burkers and whatever. I don't
Speaker 2: know what it is that the guys wear the robes
Speaker 2: with the headdresses and all the rest of this stuff,
Speaker 2: But somebody said, let me fix this for you. That's
Speaker 2: what it's kind of. You're going to replace all those
Speaker 2: right wing nationalists with Muslims. That part of it's funny.
Speaker 2: The rest of it's not. But at least they're saying
Speaker 2: the quiet part out loud. They just granted amnesty to
Speaker 2: half million illegal immigrants and the government is now going
Speaker 2: to make them Spanish citizens and let them vote. And
Speaker 2: so the question is what do we do about this?
Speaker 2: And of course Steve Bannon is out there saying we're
Speaker 2: going to have ICE at all the polls and so forth.
Speaker 2: When you look at what ICE is doing, well.
Speaker 3: It seems like someone should point out that the country
Speaker 3: that has the most Spaniards that she hates is the
Speaker 3: one that she's living in. She could move to any
Speaker 3: other country and she would be getting away from these
Speaker 3: horrible Spaniards that she despises so much.
Speaker 2: Well, globally, she's just a communist. She hates anybody that
Speaker 2: doesn't put her in charge anywhere. But you know, when
Speaker 2: we look at this again, like Linsa was saying, you're
Speaker 2: either tim team immigrant or your team tyranny, seems to
Speaker 2: be our two choices. Want to go into this massed
Speaker 2: federalized police state of surveillance and digital ID nationalized, or
Speaker 2: do you want to be taken over by Muslims. It's like,
Speaker 2: I don't know. It is a distinction without a difference
Speaker 2: in a lot of ways. It's kind of like the
Speaker 2: choices that we have between Republicans and Democrats, isn't it.
Speaker 2: You know, it's a fake choice. It's like, I don't
Speaker 2: want either one of these worlds that they.
Speaker 3: Want doubling the budget for the lure of the Somalis
Speaker 3: while also rolling out the tyrannical so called solution that
Speaker 3: isn't going to do anything. But people accustomed to martial law.
Speaker 2: That's right, and what lance is referring to there is
Speaker 2: the fact that the refugee fund, which is what was
Speaker 2: used to bring in and to fund the Somalis before
Speaker 2: they started grifting everybody for the daycare stuff. Of course,
Speaker 2: they also get the other money as well. You know,
Speaker 2: they have the daycare frauds and other things like that,
Speaker 2: but they still get their refugee money. So that fund
Speaker 2: was six billion dollars last year, and it's been that
Speaker 2: for a couple of years. The Trump administration Republicans wanted
Speaker 2: to bump that up by another five billions. They want
Speaker 2: to take it up to eleven billion dollars, eighty percent increase.
Speaker 2: While they are ringing the alarm bell about Somali refugees,
Speaker 2: they are funding the very mechanism that brought them in.
Speaker 2: Talk about a welfare magnet, talk about fraud. That's what
Speaker 2: this truly is. And so Steve Bannon's approach is to
Speaker 2: let's let's ice agents are working out so well for
Speaker 2: what people like Steve Bannon want. This Goldman Sachs, former
Speaker 2: banker friend of Epstein. Steve Bannon called him on a
Speaker 2: daily basis for the year before he died, well after
Speaker 2: he had been a convicted pedophile and so forth just
Speaker 2: before he got a wrexit. He's calling him on a
Speaker 2: daily basis. He's got all this these tapes that he
Speaker 2: had because he was going to help Jeffrey Epstein rehabilitate
Speaker 2: his image. Why isn't Steve Bannon getting hit for any
Speaker 2: of this stuff? This guy, this crook, He is a convict, folks,
Speaker 2: Steve Bannon is a crook and a convict. And who
Speaker 2: did he swindle his own people? He swindled Maga people
Speaker 2: said we'll build a wall, absconded with the money. He
Speaker 2: got convicted for that, went to jail, and of course
Speaker 2: his pal fellow, who said there's no honor among thieves,
Speaker 2: Trump pardoned him. And so you know, while we have
Speaker 2: this kind of thing happening here, say saying I got
Speaker 2: armed agents with guns. What was this woman's crime? She
Speaker 2: was filming police who say they have no restraints, so
Speaker 2: they put a pull their guns, point the guns at her,
Speaker 2: get out of the car. We're going to arrest this
Speaker 2: citizen for filming the police and public as they are
Speaker 2: filming everything we do. You want to live in a
Speaker 2: country like that? I don't. That's why I've made this
Speaker 2: front and center for the last several days. This is
Speaker 2: one of the worst things that can happen to this country,
Speaker 2: truly is. And so Bannon then says, they're exactly what
Speaker 2: we need at the elections.
Speaker 1: Right, You're damn right.
Speaker 2: We're gonna have ice surround the polls come November. We're
Speaker 2: not gonna sit here and allow you to steal.
Speaker 4: The country again.
Speaker 5: And you can, you can whine and cry and throw
Speaker 5: your toys at the prim all you.
Speaker 2: Want, but we will never look againief crook, Steve Bannon,
Speaker 2: he ought to be banned. Look, he's nothing but a
Speaker 2: rebranding of what Obama did. Remember during the Obama one
Speaker 2: of the Obama elections, they had some gang of black
Speaker 2: thugs and they show up with baseball bats and scare
Speaker 2: off anybody they think it's not going to vote for
Speaker 2: their guy. That's what that is. That's exactly what that is.
Speaker 2: It's just a different group of thugs. These guys have
Speaker 2: got official badges. Right, the other guy said badges. We
Speaker 2: don't have made those thinking badges right straight out of
Speaker 2: uh Sierra Madre anyway. Uh, she's advocating genocide of her
Speaker 2: own people. That's what Elon must said. And he's absolutely
Speaker 2: right about that this is the goal of the left
Speaker 2: and the liberals who are ruling the EU. This is
Speaker 2: why they pushed through the Migration Pact as many new
Speaker 2: citizens as possible imported from outside of Europe. That is
Speaker 2: their hope for additional votes in the elections and to
Speaker 2: maintain power. And that's not ultimately what they want. Ultimately,
Speaker 2: what they want as a civil war, So don't give
Speaker 2: that to them. That's what they want here in America
Speaker 2: as well. So a lot of people reply to that said,
Speaker 2: you know, get them out of the Shinjin How you
Speaker 2: pronounce that the Shinjin area, that's the essentially the free
Speaker 2: trade zone. The no, you don't have to have a
Speaker 2: passport to go from country to country. Those were the
Speaker 2: things that was really strange. When I was in high
Speaker 2: school and went with a group music group that was
Speaker 2: there and you know, we went to it was like,
Speaker 2: you know, one of these things like nine countries and
Speaker 2: ten days or something. You know, we were constantly traveling
Speaker 2: and going from police place, and it was really strange
Speaker 2: because these countries are like the size of states in
Speaker 2: the United States, and of course states originally were countries
Speaker 2: when we created the federal abomination. That's in Washington, DC.
Speaker 2: But you know, you drive a little bit and you
Speaker 2: get to a border crossing and you have to show
Speaker 2: your passport and all the rest of this stuff. And
Speaker 2: that's what the she engine zone got rid of. I
Speaker 2: thought it was really interesting because you know, you go
Speaker 2: just a little ways and it was a completely different culture,
Speaker 2: different language, different food, you name it, right, people even
Speaker 2: dress differently. And now that is all being homogenized into
Speaker 2: a global gray. They're talking about multiculturalism. What they've done
Speaker 2: is they've gotten rid of the multicultures. It's this kind
Speaker 2: of gray uniculture that is out there. So, yeah, your
Speaker 2: destiny twenty to twenty six says, let's not forget Bannon's
Speaker 2: other fellon buddy Miles glow Is sentencing continue to get
Speaker 2: pushed back. That tells us something doesn't as well. That's
Speaker 2: a guy who was part of the insider group of
Speaker 2: the CCP, the Chinese Communist Party. He became a billionaire.
Speaker 2: We know how they become billionaires. It's coney capitalism, this
Speaker 2: kind of fascist economy. This is the model, by the
Speaker 2: way of the Trump regime. You know, let's get a
Speaker 2: lot of people in. We have a controlling interest, and
Speaker 2: we profit from all these different countries. That's what Trump
Speaker 2: is doing with Intel and all these other buyings stock
Speaker 2: in these things, government ownership of them. That's very different
Speaker 2: than the bailouts that we've had in the past of
Speaker 2: like christ Or and other things like that.
Speaker 4: And.
Speaker 2: Those were wrong. I never supported those. But now what
Speaker 2: Trump is doing, he's not just helping a business that
Speaker 2: he wants to succeed, or a business that's failing or
Speaker 2: something like that as a backstop. They want to manage it.
Speaker 2: This is Chinese communist style, and it is this fascist
Speaker 2: economic merger between corporations and government. And it's also the
Speaker 2: corruption of crony capitalism. And that's how Woe got rich
Speaker 2: in China. Then he made some enemies for whatever reason,
Speaker 2: and he had to flee, and of course Steve Bannon
Speaker 2: was arrested on his yacht. When Steve Bannon was fleecing
Speaker 2: his own people, why does he have an audience, I
Speaker 2: don't understand it. It's like it's kind of like the
Speaker 2: Sate of Masochism thing, right. The worst that Trump and
Speaker 2: Bannon treat people, the more they love them. I saw
Speaker 2: what Trump and Alex Jones did the people over January
Speaker 2: the sixth, and they got bigger than ever. Same thing
Speaker 2: with Bannon. He rips people off on this wall thing,
Speaker 2: and he's bigger than ever. It's crazy. It really does
Speaker 2: say something batter our country. I had a friend in
Speaker 2: the Libertarian Party says, yeah, you know, politics is really
Speaker 2: like sata masochism, you know, tie me up and beat
Speaker 2: me please. You know, it's people always begging for that
Speaker 2: kind of stuff. But this is even worse than that.
Speaker 2: This is directly the people who have ripped them off,
Speaker 2: abused them, gotten them in legal trouble and so forth,
Speaker 2: and they follow them, they give them money, they listen
Speaker 2: to their worldview. It's just amazing to me what happens
Speaker 2: with it real. Jason Barker, good to see you there.
Speaker 2: The Knights of the Storm, he says, again, they say
Speaker 2: we don't need weapons of war. They are fifteen on
Speaker 2: the streets, but they come out in full kit. Who
Speaker 2: are they at war with? Rhetorical question of course from Jason.
Speaker 2: We know exactly whore they're at war with.
Speaker 4: There.
Speaker 2: It's with us, and they've had they've been at war
Speaker 2: with us for quite some time, you know, the twenty
Speaker 2: twenty thing, the lockdown. I said, this is a medical
Speaker 2: martial law for all practical purposes. The sanctions against main
Speaker 2: street and small mom and pop businesses, you're not essential,
Speaker 2: and that is the first act of war, always sanctions.
Speaker 2: Guard Goldsmith Liberty Conspiracy says Minnesota is being targeted because
Speaker 2: Trump administration goons. It's not called administration, that's called aime.
Speaker 2: I said that yesterday. I refused to call this guy president.
Speaker 2: He has defied and shredded the Constitution in every way,
Speaker 2: shape and form that he has. Yet he says there's
Speaker 2: no controlling legal authority the essentially like Gore of his
Speaker 2: actions say, he hasn't had that exact quote yet, but
Speaker 2: they did say that about international law, for example, and
Speaker 2: he feels that way about domestic law as well. So
Speaker 2: if he has divorced himself from the Constitution like an
Speaker 2: ex wife, he is no longer the president, you know.
Speaker 2: It's just like he's no longer the husband of wife
Speaker 2: number one, wife number two, Wife number one is dead now.
Speaker 2: But so you don't call him husband, and he's not
Speaker 2: a president anymore of this country. He's just Trump and
Speaker 2: his quote unquote administration is not administering anything. It is
Speaker 2: a regime that protects itself regardless of what the constraints
Speaker 2: of the law are. So it is a Trump regime.
Speaker 2: But with that caveat there, sorry guard point is these
Speaker 2: goons in the Trump regime know that MAGA really hate
Speaker 2: the somales. Thus the arbitrary focus on the welfare fraud,
Speaker 2: which they had ignored during Trump's first administration. I reported
Speaker 2: on it during Trump's first administration. They did nothing about
Speaker 2: it during his first administration, and they did nothing about
Speaker 2: it for most of the year this last year as
Speaker 2: they were ramping up ice and sending them through the streets,
Speaker 2: even in Minneapolis. They did nothing about it until you
Speaker 2: had the report, and then once it got that went viral,
Speaker 2: then they focus on the smalies, except they don't focus
Speaker 2: on the smillies. Who do you see getting arrested and
Speaker 2: killed Americans? Americans who are taking pictures of them? I
Speaker 2: don't know. I haven't seen any stats about how they're
Speaker 2: getting rid of the smalies. And if they want to
Speaker 2: get rid of the fraud, you go out and start
Speaker 2: arresting people, like I've said so many times, get the
Speaker 2: accountants and the lawyers and go after walls and go
Speaker 2: after the other people who are part of this. The
Speaker 2: Americans as well as the Somalies who are part of
Speaker 2: this fraud. They're not interested in doing this. They want
Speaker 2: to have a conflict.
Speaker 3: And like you've been mentioning, the first thing you would
Speaker 3: do if you were serious about fixing the problem is
Speaker 3: get rid of the welfare lure. But they are doing
Speaker 3: the opposite of that. They're rapidly increasingly. Yeah, they're double
Speaker 3: importing a whole bunch more because Trump loves the Somalis.
Speaker 3: They are the perfect excuse in America. Are like the
Speaker 3: positive COVID tests.
Speaker 2: That's a good analogy, Lanes. I like that. I think
Speaker 2: this extra money for the refugee program, they might be
Speaker 2: putting that in place for the Ukrainians. Right, we're going
Speaker 2: to wind up instead of you think things are bad
Speaker 2: with the Somalis, wait till the Ukrainians come in. They
Speaker 2: have been perfecting the art of corruption for a very
Speaker 2: long time. Even Bill Gates said is the most corrupt
Speaker 2: country on Earth. And so you start bringing in the
Speaker 2: Ukrainian mobs and see what happens and in them and
Speaker 2: other six billion dollars.
Speaker 3: Right, of course, what's going to happen. The COVID tests
Speaker 3: were fake, whereas this is a real problem that they're
Speaker 3: creating in order to create tyranny.
Speaker 2: That's right. Well, it's take a look at this phony
Speaker 2: Trump regime and the fact that it's there to support
Speaker 2: the Second Amendment and the rights of people to protect themselves.
Speaker 2: This is something that it's amazing to me how anybody
Speaker 2: could think that about Trump based on his own just
Speaker 2: ramblings about revealing what he really thinks about the Second Amendment. Fortunately,
Speaker 2: I can do whatever I want. I can ban anything
Speaker 2: I want, and we can take the guns and do
Speaker 2: the due process later. Fortunately, I can ban any components
Speaker 2: that I want. And of course the Democrats were eager
Speaker 2: to grab that precedent from Trump. And now you've got
Speaker 2: Janine Pirot. I hope I'm pronouncing her name right, And
Speaker 2: I'll never watched Fox News. She's attempting damage control because
Speaker 2: of her gun comments, and her gun comments are truly amazing.
Speaker 2: This shows you what you get from Fox News. And
Speaker 2: you spell that a faux right, it's faux news, right.
Speaker 2: This is what you get from Fox News and what
Speaker 2: you get from the Trump administration totally phony, phony conservatives,
Speaker 2: phony lawyers and attorneys. So she bragged about her office
Speaker 2: taking guns off the street in Washington, d C. So
Speaker 2: that those guns cannot be used in homicides or assaults
Speaker 2: of deadly weapons, or in any other kind of carjacking
Speaker 2: or any kind of robbery. This, folks, is exactly the
Speaker 2: kind of rhetoric that we see from Democrats all the time.
Speaker 2: We've got to get those guns off the streets because
Speaker 2: crimes are being committed with them. You know, you can
Speaker 2: look at it from that perspective. It's kind of the
Speaker 2: gun of the glass half full, of glass half empty.
Speaker 2: There are far more, except that it's not an even switch. There.
Speaker 2: There are far more crimes that are stopped by people
Speaker 2: having guns, and there of guns deturs crime. They know that.
Speaker 2: That's why they put armed guards everywhere. That's why they
Speaker 2: got armed guards with armored cars and things like that. Right,
Speaker 2: But I tell you want to see an armored car guard,
Speaker 2: you go to China. We were there when we were
Speaker 2: in China for my daughter's adoption, the four of us, Lance, Travis,
Speaker 2: and Karen and I. By the way, today is Karen's birthday,
Speaker 2: so we're sure a happy birthday. I hope she has
Speaker 2: a great day. Wish she could have taken it off,
Speaker 2: but couldn't go anywhere anyway because of the snow, we're stuck.
Speaker 2: But anyway, we were went to this area that was
Speaker 2: a shopping area and it was like a crowd. The
Speaker 2: only time I'd ever seen a crowd like that before
Speaker 2: was once when I went up to New York, where
Speaker 2: Karen was from, and we went to the Saint Patrick's
Speaker 2: Day parade in New York and it was just wall
Speaker 2: to wall people and the crowd starts going in one direction.
Speaker 2: Karen and I were there and I got caught in
Speaker 2: one side of the crowd and she was on the
Speaker 2: other side and got sheared off spring with the just
Speaker 2: yelled her, I'll meet you over at such and such
Speaker 2: a place. You couldn't fight the crowd. It was amazing.
Speaker 2: And it was about that crowded in the shopping area
Speaker 2: in China. And this armored truck pulls up and I
Speaker 2: can see through the window that a guy's holding a shotgun,
Speaker 2: right and they open up the door and he gets out.
Speaker 2: He levels the shotgun at the crowd. He's pointing it
Speaker 2: at us like he's Christynomer or something. It was crazy.
Speaker 2: I said, let's get out of here, just in case
Speaker 2: somebody tries something's gonna shoot everybody here with that shotgun.
Speaker 2: So anyway, that's why you have armored guards and why
Speaker 2: you have armored cars, and hopefully they got better muzzle control.
Speaker 2: But the fact that you have firearms is a deterrence, right,
Speaker 2: That's why they use that there. And she doesn't realize
Speaker 2: that because she's a gun control liberal. Oh she worked
Speaker 2: on Fox News. Oh she's with Donald Trump. Well that
Speaker 2: just proves it, doesn't it. So she says, you bring
Speaker 2: a gun into the district, you mark my, You're going
Speaker 2: to go to jail. I don't listen to this. I
Speaker 2: don't care if you have a license in another district,
Speaker 2: and I don't care if you're a law abiding gun
Speaker 2: owner somewhere else. You bring a gun into this district.
Speaker 2: Count on going to jail and hope you get your
Speaker 2: gun back. How about that. Yeah, you may be law
Speaker 2: abiding and have a license all the rest of stuff,
Speaker 2: but I'm going to put you in jail and steal
Speaker 2: your gun. That's the Trump administration, I'm sorry, regime regime.
Speaker 2: Even I say it all the time. So, yeah, she's
Speaker 2: gone native. She's now a district of criminals. Criminal. She
Speaker 2: fits right in in DC, doesn't She Tuesday morning, Pero
Speaker 2: attempted to quell the outrage. She said, let me be clear,
Speaker 2: I'm a proud support of the Second Amendment, but we
Speaker 2: have a law that requires handguns to be licensed in Washington,
Speaker 2: d C. M Okay, well they all say that, don't
Speaker 2: They all say I'm a proud supporter of the Second Amendment.
Speaker 2: I've seen people like Chuck Schumer say that type of stuff.
Speaker 2: And then we have a law that requires handguns to
Speaker 2: be licensed. Hey, lady, your lawyer, that law is in
Speaker 2: violation of the Constitution. In violation of the Constitution. So
Speaker 2: so much for her being a lawyer either. She tried
Speaker 2: again a few hours later with a video that was
Speaker 2: captured captioned brother a message to my fellow gun owners,
Speaker 2: put your safety back on. And she pointed out that
Speaker 2: she is a proud supporter of the Second Amendment. She
Speaker 2: has spoken at the NRA convention. Some of my best
Speaker 2: friends are gun owners. How about that about that defense,
Speaker 2: that's the one we always here. Well, you're still a
Speaker 2: Democratic gun grabber in my book. So she said, I'm
Speaker 2: a proud supporter of the Second Amendment. In other words,
Speaker 2: bo from what she said, it just doesn't apply in
Speaker 2: my district when I'm in charge, the Second Amendment doesn't apply. Lady,
Speaker 2: you took an other to the constitution to start with,
Speaker 2: your liar to start with. So she says, there's a
Speaker 2: big difference here. You're responsible, you follow the laws. You're
Speaker 2: not going to have a problem with me, she said.
Speaker 2: But she just said, if you are law abiding citizen
Speaker 2: and you've even gone to the problem of getting a license,
Speaker 2: she's still going to take the gun away from you.
Speaker 2: And then she comes back and says exactly the opposite.
Speaker 2: I guess you figures will get the attention of a
Speaker 2: fruit fly. Well, that may be maga, but that's not you.
Speaker 2: And I right, we can see that when she says
Speaker 2: one thing one day and another thing the next day,
Speaker 2: we can see what's going on here. Says, you come
Speaker 2: into my district. I don't care. If you're a law
Speaker 2: abiding citizen and you've got permits and you have gone
Speaker 2: through all the legal hoops that are unconstitutional to carry
Speaker 2: a gun, you come here, I'm going to put you
Speaker 2: in jail and take your gun. And then the next
Speaker 2: day she said, well, if you follow the law, you're
Speaker 2: not going to have a problem with me. If she
Speaker 2: followed the constitution. She wouldn't have a problem with you
Speaker 2: as a gun owner. She doesn't follow the law. Let's
Speaker 2: understand who the criminal is here. The criminal is not
Speaker 2: the law abiding citizen who's got a permit. The criminal
Speaker 2: is the person who swore to uphold the Constitution and
Speaker 2: is now threatening people as she's going to get rid
Speaker 2: of the constitution. That's the Trump regime. That's Janine Pirout.
Speaker 2: Go back to Fox News. You're an embarrassment there anyway.
Speaker 2: So you know, she'd already said, I don't care if
Speaker 2: you're following the law. So I guess what we could
Speaker 2: say we called District of the Washington DC, we call
Speaker 2: the District of Criminals. I guess we could call it
Speaker 2: Washington DeFi Constitution. Maybe that's what DC stands for. I
Speaker 2: think that's a good description of everything they do. Washington
Speaker 2: Defy Constitution. That's what Washington d C stands for. Well,
Speaker 2: the NRA wasn't happy being drawn into this association with her.
Speaker 2: They want to disassociate from her. So they came back
Speaker 2: and they said, do you want a bill to allow
Speaker 2: people to legally carry a gun in DC? I mean,
Speaker 2: there's been fights over this over and over again, the
Speaker 2: Color case that went to the Supreme Court that was
Speaker 2: over an off duty police officer who was carrying a
Speaker 2: gun off duty and they came after him. So I
Speaker 2: guess the question for Pierro Parene or whatever her name is,
Speaker 2: Janine Piro, I guess the question for her is what
Speaker 2: about a law abiding police officer who wants to carry
Speaker 2: a gun in the district of Columbia right or the
Speaker 2: people who defy the constitution? What should be done about him?
Speaker 2: Do you agree with that Color case decision in the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court That was key because they said no, it
Speaker 2: is an individual right. And it happened in that district
Speaker 2: of criminals that she's so happy about. They were defying
Speaker 2: the constitution that got slapped down by the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: on that they didn't even want an off duty cop
Speaker 2: to carry a gun. They don't care. They're going to
Speaker 2: take them out of people's saying. So all this stuff
Speaker 2: about well we rapists and criminals and murderers and robbers
Speaker 2: and everything, we take the guns away from them, they
Speaker 2: were taking them away from off duty policemen. So again
Speaker 2: the NRA is pushing back against this because she tried
Speaker 2: to help herself associating with them, they kind of shoved
Speaker 2: her away. So a Republican Congressman, Greg Stuby from Florida said,
Speaker 2: I bring a gun into the district every week. He
Speaker 2: tweeted that at her I have a license in Florida
Speaker 2: and DC to carry and I will continue to carry
Speaker 2: to protect myself and others come and take it. Well,
Speaker 2: he got to go and take her out of being
Speaker 2: a US attorney. Why not the impeach her if she's
Speaker 2: so adamantly opposed to the Constitution that she swore to
Speaker 2: as a condition of her office. So the NRA got
Speaker 2: into the mix the following morning, said, your right to
Speaker 2: self defense should not end simply because you crossed some
Speaker 2: state line or you crossed into Washington to fire the
Speaker 2: constitution again, all jurisdictions, everybody who gets an office swears
Speaker 2: to a public constitution. That happens pretty much. I think
Speaker 2: at every state and local office they swear to hobby constitution.
Speaker 2: But not her. And then you also had in this
Speaker 2: last week another US attorney's office, this one in LA.
Speaker 2: So here's Jean Piro, Jeanine Piro in Washington District of Criminals.
Speaker 2: And then you have another person of her same rank
Speaker 2: in LA and he was the one who said, if
Speaker 2: you approached a law enforcement with a gun, there's a
Speaker 2: high likelihood that they'll be legally justified in shooting you.
Speaker 2: These are kind of people, but the Trump administration wants
Speaker 2: let's put to rest forever this mythology that Trump supports
Speaker 2: the Second Amendment in any way, shape or form. Any
Speaker 2: support of the Second Amendment is purely coincidental, just like
Speaker 2: any support for the right to life. It's purely coincidental.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, Milania is bragging about the
Speaker 2: fact that she's pro.
Speaker 6: Abortion right, that you are staunchly for a woman's right
Speaker 6: to choose your pro choice. You write it is imperative
Speaker 6: to guarantee that women have autonomy in deciding their preference
Speaker 6: and having children based on their own convictions, free from
Speaker 6: intervention or pressure from government.
Speaker 2: Plan Parenthood prostitute Millennia that.
Speaker 7: Before you wrote that in the book. Yes, he knew
Speaker 7: my position and my beliefs since the day we met.
Speaker 7: And I believe in individual freedom. I want to decide
Speaker 7: what I wanted to do with my body.
Speaker 1: I think sold it.
Speaker 7: I don't want government in my personal business.
Speaker 2: I think it's it's her business selling her body.
Speaker 7: As I said in the book, and it's very well
Speaker 7: explained in the chapter what does really my body my
Speaker 7: choice means?
Speaker 2: It's not your body? Can you understand that it's somebody
Speaker 2: else that you're killing, different fingerprints, different DNA half the time,
Speaker 2: a different sex, not your body. You're murdering a baby lady.
Speaker 2: And of course the Trump administration, after they cut funding
Speaker 2: the Planned parenthood with Title ten in March, they quietly
Speaker 2: restored it in December and then the next day after
Speaker 2: people found out about that about a month later, think
Speaker 2: a while because it was so quietly done after they
Speaker 2: found out about it. The pro life organizations have invited JD.
Speaker 2: Vance to speak because Trump is so pro life, isn't he? Yeah,
Speaker 2: the pedophile unbelievable, unbelievable. Maybe his version of birth control
Speaker 2: is finding girls that are prepew that pubescent right. Anyway,
Speaker 2: it's no surprise the conservatives have rediscovered their love of
Speaker 2: federal powers as meanses. And that's exactly what's going on,
Speaker 2: especially this fantasy that if you're on team Trump, you
Speaker 2: somehow now are part of the decisions and that you
Speaker 2: have the power and nothing is ever going to change.
Speaker 2: He says, it's not surprising, but nevertheless it's been remarkable
Speaker 2: how quickly American conservatives and I think we need to
Speaker 2: make a distinction here. You know, we had people in
Speaker 2: the past who were pro war conservatives and violated some
Speaker 2: of the fundamental tenets of that have been historical conservatism,
Speaker 2: basically America first, mind our own business and peace and
Speaker 2: trade with everybody else, but foreign entanglements with no one.
Speaker 2: And so that type of conservative started being replaced during
Speaker 2: the Reagan administration with people like Gene Kirkpatrick, a Democrat
Speaker 2: that he put in. There were very much you know,
Speaker 2: about getting involved in foreign wars and things like that,
Speaker 2: so he came up with the term neocon. Well, these
Speaker 2: people are actually worse than that. They're Maga cons, I guess,
Speaker 2: or you can call them Trump cons or whatever. So
Speaker 2: if an American conservatives have been convinced to ignore or
Speaker 2: to make excuses for virtually everything this regime does so
Speaker 2: long as Trump is in the White House. This includes
Speaker 2: runaway deficit spending, inflationary monetary policy, foreign wars, disregard of
Speaker 2: federalism that is, every imaginable attack on the Tenth Amendment
Speaker 2: you can think of, and even higher taxes policies that
Speaker 2: would have been denounced by conservatives under Obama or Biden
Speaker 2: are reframed as virtuous under the current administration. De Centralization
Speaker 2: and local control used to be what they supported, but
Speaker 2: now they are the champions of the use of federal
Speaker 2: police and federal troops in any city where the local
Speaker 2: government runs a foul of the regime's agenda. Calls for
Speaker 2: more aggressive federal power have essentially are especially loud on
Speaker 2: the matter of immigration, but conservatives have also called for
Speaker 2: the regime to ignore limits on the use of federal
Speaker 2: troops and domestic law enforcement. Overall, Conservatives have cheered the
Speaker 2: new federal powers to override state regulation of AI and
Speaker 2: they're now calling for nationalization of all election law. And
Speaker 2: of course they will nationalized the election law. And Steve Bannon,
Speaker 2: rather than seeing a problem with massed armored body armor
Speaker 2: and again wearhing this absurd camouflage. That's not camouflage if
Speaker 2: you're walking around on snowy streets in Minneapolis. It's notmouflage
Speaker 2: in any urban environment, but especially when everything else is
Speaker 2: white and you're out there in your jungle camouflage. What
Speaker 2: a bunch of fools they are. It's absolutely amazing. But
Speaker 2: the masks and the attacks on people who film them,
Speaker 2: I think are the key issue. Bannon doesn't see a
Speaker 2: problem with that. The convict Steve Bannon wants to extend
Speaker 2: that to every aspect of life and the people who
Speaker 2: listen to him. He's misleading you yet again. Right. He
Speaker 2: misled the people who listened to him and defrauded them.
Speaker 2: He wants to defraud us all of our freedom and
Speaker 2: our liberty and our constitution. That's what this guy is
Speaker 2: really about. There's no reason to be surprised or scandalized
Speaker 2: by the total lack of commitment to any ideological standards,
Speaker 2: nor is there any reason to expect anything better. And
Speaker 2: I would say, well, this is an article by I
Speaker 2: think it's Ryan Macon. I think that wrote this article.
Speaker 2: I'm not sure at the Misis Institute.
Speaker 4: Yes it is.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I always thought that about the Tea Party, for example.
Speaker 2: As I said, there was absolutely no ideological core there.
Speaker 2: It's just this empty, hollow thing. I don't like it.
Speaker 2: We're taxed enough already. It had no more of a
Speaker 2: philosophical or a practical understanding of what was happening with
Speaker 2: taxes and spending than that guy in New York. That
Speaker 2: black guy who kept running for a mayor of New York.
Speaker 2: He said, the rent's too damn high. You know, it's
Speaker 2: a slogan. He just kept shouting that, and it's like, well,
Speaker 2: you have no idea what the dynamics are about this
Speaker 2: or what to do about it. You don't offer solution
Speaker 2: just to complain about the fact it's too high. So
Speaker 2: you'll have this tea party taxed enough already. What do
Speaker 2: they want to do? They want to cut government back,
Speaker 2: while there wasn't any clear agenda for that. Are you
Speaker 2: going to cut the spending. If you don't cut the spending,
Speaker 2: what are you going to do? Just increase the deficit. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's what they wanted to do. So the current conservative
Speaker 2: fondness for deficit spending, easy money, regime change, wars, untrammeled
Speaker 2: federal police power, and higher taxes. It never changes substantially,
Speaker 2: and so that includes things like the Central Bank's monetary
Speaker 2: powers and other things like that. The lack of any
Speaker 2: true division in the ruling elite's policy agenda can be
Speaker 2: seen and how the policy responds to emergencies, alleged military threats, pandemics,
Speaker 2: financial crises. It's always essentially the same regardless of which
Speaker 2: party is in power. So with every emergency we witness
Speaker 2: an increase in federal pressure on the media, vast new
Speaker 2: amounts of federal spending, new innovations in expensive monetary policy,
Speaker 2: and more focus on surveillance. The rank and file supporters
Speaker 2: of Trump now rather fancifully believe that they are in power,
Speaker 2: that their preferred policies will be implemented, and that these
Speaker 2: policies will somehow make a lasting change. Well, you think
Speaker 2: they're on your side, you want to look at some
Speaker 2: of the other really kind of wedge and emotional issues,
Speaker 2: you know, gun ownership and protecting the right to life.
Speaker 2: These are our core things that I say wedge issues
Speaker 2: or fundamental issues, because they're not about money, for example,
Speaker 2: or wars or things like that. But these are kind
Speaker 2: of personal issues, and you think that they're on your side,
Speaker 2: they're not as a matter of fact, when you look
Speaker 2: at the second class status of gun regulation, and this
Speaker 2: is something that is both Republican and Democrat. We have
Speaker 2: a court case right now before the Supreme Court about
Speaker 2: what is happening in Hawaii. Hawaii has come up with
Speaker 2: because they said you have a right, an individual right
Speaker 2: to protect yourself with Heller and then also with Bruin.
Speaker 2: Because of that, Hawaii and some other jurisdictions have said,
Speaker 2: now if you want to carry it on private property,
Speaker 2: you have to get the express permission and of the
Speaker 2: private property owner before you carry it. That's how they
Speaker 2: have turned everything upside down. Rather than saying, well, it's
Speaker 2: private property. If somebody doesn't want you carrying a gun,
Speaker 2: they can put a notice up and say don't come
Speaker 2: on here. Instead by saying it's prohibited on all private
Speaker 2: property unless expressly permitted. You see how they've turned everything
Speaker 2: upside down and inside out. But of course they have
Speaker 2: done that with everything. Pretty much everything is prohibited by
Speaker 2: the federal government or the Democrats, or they want to
Speaker 2: make it that way unless expressly permitted. So this is
Speaker 2: just another example of this. And what it does is
Speaker 2: it sets up all kinds of legal traps so that
Speaker 2: the gun control people in Hawaii, kind of like Jenine
Speaker 2: Pierrot and the District of Criminals, those people can say,
Speaker 2: if you're on private property, do you have a note
Speaker 2: from them allowing you to carry them this on their property.
Speaker 2: I mean, they might be fine with it if you
Speaker 2: ask them, but since you didn't ask them, we're going
Speaker 2: to prosecute you. So that's what's being Adjudicatedreme Court right now,
Speaker 2: that by default you don't get to carry a gun,
Speaker 2: and they've set up these kind of legal entrapments for people.
Speaker 2: So I'm going to take a quick break and we
Speaker 2: come back. We're going to talk about what I mentioned
Speaker 2: at the beginning of the show, and that is yet
Speaker 2: another strategy to disarm people, except this time it's kind
Speaker 2: of a twist. Usually it is the target is the
Speaker 2: Second Amendment. In this materilar case, they're using the Second Amendment,
Speaker 2: I believe, as cover for something that is much much
Speaker 2: larger in terms of prohibition. And they're doing it in
Speaker 2: an area, of course, where everybody hates. The Second Amendment
Speaker 2: is in Washington State, it's another one in New York.
Speaker 2: But it's something's going to be very, very far reaching.
Speaker 2: So we're going to take a quick break here and
Speaker 2: we're going to be right back.
Speaker 8: Stay with us making sense.
Speaker 1: Comment again. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: If you like the Eagles on it, Doc doesn't Away,
Speaker 2: the cars and Heuey Lewis and the news. They say
Speaker 2: the hors.
Speaker 9: You'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio, download
Speaker 9: our app or listen now at APS radio dot com.
Speaker 2: Well, here's the lead. I don't want to bury the
Speaker 2: lead too far. What I've been talking about is a
Speaker 2: three D printer bill that's coming out of Washington State
Speaker 2: and another one out of New York. Now, of course
Speaker 2: they have created this boogeyman called ghost guns out there.
Speaker 2: Sounds scary, doesn't it. You know they're going it just
Speaker 2: like assault rifles. Don't talk to me about assault rifles.
Speaker 2: And you got masked federal police sticking guns in everybody's face.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's crazy. Just like Christine omis up. These
Speaker 2: guys are doing it intentionally. She didn't know what she
Speaker 2: was doing. But this is in Washington State and this
Speaker 2: is something that really it's hard to find any information
Speaker 2: much on it. Lance is the one who found this
Speaker 2: because he's very much involved in three D printing and
Speaker 2: following that. Of course, we were also interested in guns
Speaker 2: as well, but it was actually through the three D
Speaker 2: printing side that he found out about it. And a
Speaker 2: lot of people in three D printing community have just
Speaker 2: dismissed this out of hand, saying, oh, I don't care
Speaker 2: about guns. Fine, stop the ghost guns. Those things are
Speaker 2: scary anyway, I don't talk to me about ghosts, goes gunbusters.
Speaker 3: Most people in the three D printing community are against it,
Speaker 3: but I'm seeing a lot of people that don't really
Speaker 3: appreciate just how bad this is. I'll get into more
Speaker 3: of the stuff they're missing later as you describe this.
Speaker 2: Yeah, the guy who goes into this a great deal
Speaker 2: on YouTube is what's his name, Legal Moses.
Speaker 3: I think Loyal Moses, Loyal channel that I saw a
Speaker 3: very in depth coverage of this.
Speaker 2: Legal Moses. But anyway, he's explained a lot of these
Speaker 2: people who came back to him said well, I don't
Speaker 2: really care. Yeah, do ban him. I want to see
Speaker 2: him banned. And he says, you don't understand how this
Speaker 2: is going to impact you, and in a really ham
Speaker 2: fisted way, it's going to pretty much make it impossible
Speaker 2: for people to do three D printing if it is possible.
Speaker 2: It's going to radically raise the price of three D
Speaker 2: printers and people using them for a lot of different things.
Speaker 2: He can use them for fun, but you've got a
Speaker 2: lot of farmers who are using them to print parts
Speaker 2: and things like that, replacement parts. But Of course, this
Speaker 2: all gets back in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, where
Speaker 2: people like corporations like John Deere don't want you doing
Speaker 2: any repairs on your stuff. They want to maintain the
Speaker 2: fiction that even after you buy the tractor from them,
Speaker 2: they own it for life and you're not supposed to
Speaker 2: do anything with it.
Speaker 3: Differences the John Deere stuff is coming from the John
Speaker 3: Deere company. This would be legal mandates saying that you
Speaker 3: have to, as a manufacturer, put in restrictions to prevent
Speaker 3: the end user from modifying or repairing their own equipment.
Speaker 3: And this is for more than just pretty printers. It
Speaker 3: specifically mentions C and C machines, and it's any type
Speaker 3: of device that can receive information from a computer to
Speaker 3: create an object in real life. So that includes C
Speaker 3: and C machines, laser cutters, a whole bunch of other devices.
Speaker 2: That's right, anything like that. And so it follows, like
Speaker 2: Lance said, it follows a very familiar pattern, doesn't it.
Speaker 2: You know, when you look at speech prohibitions, the government
Speaker 2: was always saying, well, we're not banning. There's a law
Speaker 2: against censorship, but we're not censoring people. It's a social
Speaker 2: media companies it's YouTube that's censoring people, right, we don't
Speaker 2: have anything to do with that. And then we find out,
Speaker 2: of course we knew behind the lines that they were
Speaker 2: dropping hints, and sometimes it wasn't even a hint. Sometimes
Speaker 2: it was like do this, you know, get rid of
Speaker 2: this person. And this is the type of thing. There's
Speaker 2: a long history of the government doing this kind of tactic.
Speaker 2: There's two kind of tactics that are very sneaky and
Speaker 2: just evil tactics that the government is used for the
Speaker 2: longest time. One of them I talk about with a pandemic,
Speaker 2: the bribe and blackmail tactic. You like doing business with
Speaker 2: the federal government, well we're going to cut that business
Speaker 2: off if you don't mandate vaccines for all your employees
Speaker 2: that type of thing, or to the state. You know,
Speaker 2: you like to have that money for your sports, Well
Speaker 2: you better put the boys in the girl's bathroom or whatever.
Speaker 2: So they've used that type of thing all along, and
Speaker 2: they've done that very explicitly with a lot of these
Speaker 2: policies from the federal government. But when it comes to corporations,
Speaker 2: they've done things like that for censorship. They want the
Speaker 2: social media companies or YouTube or whatever to censor certain
Speaker 2: topics and to sensor and ban the people who talk
Speaker 2: talk about those topics, and so they apply pressure to them,
Speaker 2: and the pleasure pressure is sometimes behind closed doors, sometimes
Speaker 2: it's implicit, but it is still coming from the government.
Speaker 2: We've seen the documents now that Elon Musk released some
Speaker 2: of those, and so this is the same type of thing.
Speaker 2: They're going to go after the three D printer machines,
Speaker 2: by three D printing of guns, by going after the
Speaker 2: machine manufacturers and saying, if you don't put in the
Speaker 2: kinds of things that we're demanding in order to police this,
Speaker 2: then we're going to hit you with a seventy five
Speaker 2: thousand dollars fine, it's a felony. You're going to go
Speaker 2: to jail. All kind of very stiff penalties that are there.
Speaker 2: The hair brain scheme that they've come up with, which
Speaker 2: is really not going to work. And in a sense,
Speaker 2: there is a great deal of parallel between this and
Speaker 2: the social media censorship that we saw happening, because this
Speaker 2: is a First Amendment right to have these plans and
Speaker 2: to send them around that has been tested by Cody
Speaker 2: Wilson all the way up to I think the Supreme Court,
Speaker 2: and they upheld the fact that the government could not
Speaker 2: demand that these files be taken down that show you
Speaker 2: how to manufacture gun parts, for example, or anything else.
Speaker 2: It's a first Amendment right, not just a second amendment.
Speaker 2: And so what they're doing is they're coming after a
Speaker 2: first Amendment right that's been upheld by the Supreme Court
Speaker 2: as well.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and this specifically goes against that. It makes any
Speaker 3: It makes owning the files a crime. If you have
Speaker 3: on your hard drive files that could be used to
Speaker 3: print a firearm or firearm accessory, even if it's an
Speaker 3: incomplete file, but if it has enough of the similarities,
Speaker 3: and they have a new type of technology that looks
Speaker 3: at g code and can reconstruct what the object it
Speaker 3: would make would look like. So it's not a matter
Speaker 3: of just change a few lines and now the checksum
Speaker 3: doesn't match and you can print it. It will see
Speaker 3: if it's, say eighty percent similar to a banned item,
Speaker 3: and if that's the case, this law adds. A rebuttal
Speaker 3: presumption is the legal term which is the opposite of
Speaker 3: presumed innocence. It is presumed guilt. A rebuttal presumption is
Speaker 3: something that is assumed to be true by the court
Speaker 3: unless proven otherwise. So you have a rebuttal presumption that
Speaker 3: you were planning on making and distributing that firearm. So
Speaker 3: you would be given the penalty of someone that made
Speaker 3: a firearm illegally on this bill. If you just own
Speaker 3: those files, even if someone just sent it to an
Speaker 3: email address that you own and you didn't know that
Speaker 3: you now have those files on your herd, you are
Speaker 3: now in position possession of digital contraband.
Speaker 2: Yeah, just like if you've got kitty porn on your
Speaker 2: computer or kitty porn and your email stuff. Right, And
Speaker 2: of course a rebuttal assumption that's a nice piece of
Speaker 2: legalese to hide the fact that you're guilty untill proven innocent.
Speaker 2: And that's another thing that we've seen from these people
Speaker 2: all along, and really this whole idea that the government
Speaker 2: is limited in terms of things that it can do
Speaker 2: in terms of searches, in terms of censorship and things
Speaker 2: like that, but they can get a private corporation to
Speaker 2: do it. That goes back to the middle of the
Speaker 2: twentieth century with the creation of CIA and NSA and
Speaker 2: these other creeps and criminals. That was what they were
Speaker 2: doing with AT and T. The phone company said, well,
Speaker 2: you have the phone numbers of these people. That's your
Speaker 2: private that's owned by AT and T. So if you
Speaker 2: want to give us all of their phone records and
Speaker 2: tell us everybody that's called them and everybody that they've
Speaker 2: called and when they did it, that's up to you.
Speaker 2: You can turn that over. We don't need to have
Speaker 2: a search warrant. You can just voluntarily turn it over
Speaker 2: to us. And you'd like to do that, wouldn't you,
Speaker 2: Because don't you like that monopoly that we've given AT
Speaker 2: and T for phones at the time. That's the way
Speaker 2: this whole thing works. That started with AT and T.
Speaker 2: That's why, by the way, they had the Church Committee
Speaker 2: hearings and the Senate to look at the CIA, and
Speaker 2: why they had the Pike Committee hearings in the House
Speaker 2: to look at the NSSA. It was because of that,
Speaker 2: and the outcome of it was the Foreign Intelligent Surveillance
Speaker 2: Act saying got to get a warrant. Well, this is
Speaker 2: stuff we can't tell people about it, so it's got
Speaker 2: to be secrets. So we've got to create this new
Speaker 2: structure over here, this Star Chamber Court, the fives of Court.
Speaker 2: We're gonna have one judge and he'll say, yes, you
Speaker 2: can listen to everybody on verizon, how about that? And
Speaker 2: basically come up with a general warrant essentially. And so
Speaker 2: that's how we got here. I mean, it's all come
Speaker 2: post World War two, all a part of the national
Speaker 2: security state, and it just keeps tastizing. But they keep
Speaker 2: using the same tactic because it's worked for so long.
Speaker 2: It's worked since the nineteen fifties to say, well, this
Speaker 2: corporation has got the data, they can turn it over
Speaker 2: to us. The idea that you are guilty until you've
Speaker 2: proven innocent. I mean they have taken that on steroids,
Speaker 2: through the War on drugs, and so now with this,
Speaker 2: just having these files on your computer or your email account,
Speaker 2: it's like having kiddie porn and they'll come after you.
Speaker 2: And so it's going to add a great deal of
Speaker 2: expense and technical complexity to the three D printers because
Speaker 2: they're going to have to go in and reference every
Speaker 2: time you want to try to print something, they've got
Speaker 2: to go reference a file and make sure that this
Speaker 2: isn't something that is prohibited by the government to print.
Speaker 2: Isn't that amazing? And of course.
Speaker 3: Absolutely any device that receives information from a computer. And
Speaker 3: like I said, the bill specifically mentions C and C
Speaker 3: machines as well as three D printers, but it covers
Speaker 3: much more than just three D printers and C and
Speaker 3: C machines, and all of them would have to first
Speaker 3: whenever you give it anything to make, would first have
Speaker 3: to check the files against the blacklist to make sure
Speaker 3: that you have the permission from the government to make
Speaker 3: what you want to make.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you will make nothing, and you'll be happy. This
Speaker 2: is We're going to such dark tyranny anymore. It's just amazing,
Speaker 2: isn't it. We got to somehow get control of this,
Speaker 2: but it just keeps getting worse all the time. So
Speaker 2: manufacturers must a test under penalty of perjury to the
Speaker 2: State Attorney Journal there in Washington, that their printers meet
Speaker 2: these standards. And so if there's a bug in it somewhere, okay,
Speaker 2: well now we're going to Now we're going to come
Speaker 2: after you for perjury.
Speaker 3: And that thing of a test that their printers meet
Speaker 3: these regulations. That also means that they can't let the
Speaker 3: end user modify or flash their own hardware software stuff
Speaker 3: to it. It's got to be heavily locked down like
Speaker 3: a John Dear tractor. As you mentioned before.
Speaker 2: Wouldn't it be nice if you had to have the
Speaker 2: CEOs of big pharmaceutical companies. What if they had to
Speaker 2: testify under penalty or perjury that they had tested their
Speaker 2: products for safety or even efficacy, Right, wouldn't that be
Speaker 2: a nice time? But no, we don't care about that.
Speaker 2: We just want to make sure that you don't have
Speaker 2: any guns that you could use to protect yourself against
Speaker 2: the federalized police like ICE or something like that. As
Speaker 2: they're ramping that up, the Attorney General will establish rules
Speaker 2: and maintain a database of firearm blueprint files to support detection.
Speaker 2: And that's the other issue that some of the people
Speaker 2: who are thinking about this broadly understand that that means
Speaker 2: that they can prohibit anything. Right, you like to print
Speaker 2: your Star Wars Stormtrooper to sit on your desk with
Speaker 2: a three D printer. Well, Disney might have something to
Speaker 2: say about that, they'll get that put into the files
Speaker 2: or whatever. It doesn't it extends to everything, so it
Speaker 2: can escalate up to a class see felony for corporations.
Speaker 2: Penalties up to five years in prison, finds up to
Speaker 2: fifteen thousand dollars, and so this is something that New
Speaker 2: York is doing something similar to this. This bill in
Speaker 2: Washington State, I think is up for a vote today.
Speaker 4: Is that correct, Lands, I believe so I'd have to check.
Speaker 2: So if you have any if you're in Washington State,
Speaker 2: get on the phone today to your state representatives and
Speaker 2: talk to them about this. But and you know, I
Speaker 2: do have people listen to me in Washington State. It's
Speaker 2: kind of funny when I've gone to heavily democrat areas,
Speaker 2: leftist areas like Washington State, that's been the places where
Speaker 2: I've been recognized the most. That's really surprised on about that.
Speaker 2: But anyway, the bill has sparked significant debate, supporters citing
Speaker 2: public safety and the risk of untraceable ghost guns, while
Speaker 2: critics argue that it may stifle innovation, fringe on digital rights,
Speaker 2: and impact legitimate industries like aerospace and manufacturing. Okay, now
Speaker 2: that's kind of an interesting another aspect of this that
Speaker 2: Lance and I have talked about aerospace, What do you
Speaker 2: think they're talking about there? They couldn't be talking about
Speaker 2: printing drones like they do in Ukraine, could they? Lance?
Speaker 2: You think that might be it? Because those are going
Speaker 2: to be a lot more effective weapons and an asymmetric
Speaker 2: war against the government than firearms are going to be.
Speaker 2: We can see that already in Ukraine. And so they
Speaker 2: don't want you manufacturing drones or any drone parts like
Speaker 2: that either. So there's a lot of different aspects to this.
Speaker 3: I think it really ties in with the whole networked
Speaker 3: resistance thing, the net war thing that we covered on Monday. Yeah,
Speaker 3: where if you had a whole population of citizens with
Speaker 3: three D printers, free D printed drones that are chemicality
Speaker 3: drones are going to be the future of warfare. That
Speaker 3: is the future of asymmetric warfare and guerrilla warfare. That
Speaker 3: is actually as important, if not more important than being
Speaker 3: able to print guns when it comes to resisting a
Speaker 3: tyrannical government.
Speaker 2: That's right, absolutely right. And so here we are. They
Speaker 2: are shutting this thing down, and guess where is happening
Speaker 2: at the state level. That's why it is so important
Speaker 2: to get involved at the state level, not at the
Speaker 2: federal level. You know, we've had Trump has tried to
Speaker 2: shut down the Tenth Amendment multiple ways, and one of them,
Speaker 2: of course, the so called Genesis Act, where they want
Speaker 2: to pave the way for artificial intelligence. You might as
Speaker 2: well call it the Genesis six Act. But yeah, no
Speaker 2: state laws that are going to do anything to inhibit
Speaker 2: our artificial intelligence roll out. But on the state and
Speaker 2: local level, that's really where the rubber meets the road.
Speaker 2: And so if you're in Washington State, you need to
Speaker 2: be involved with this. The boat is coming up today,
Speaker 2: I believe, and of course this I don't know what
Speaker 2: the schedule is for the similar bill in New York,
Speaker 2: but that's where this all is. Right. Now, let's take
Speaker 2: a couple of comments. Here we got Angelo nineteen ninety
Speaker 2: nine can't stand her years ago talking about Jeanine Pirout.
Speaker 2: I guess she said, I'm a judge I decided who
Speaker 2: owns a gun. Yeah, that's it. Yeah, she's a Democrat, folks.
Speaker 2: She may be on Fox News, she may have an
Speaker 2: R behind her name, but she's a Democrat, is evidenced
Speaker 2: by her position on guns and her position in the
Speaker 2: Trump regime. Angelo nineteen ninety eighty says, no, she'll probably
Speaker 2: be okay with the Magatards. They'll support anything. The dictator proclaims, yeah,
Speaker 2: and sixty one points out that her husband served seventeen
Speaker 2: months in federal prison for thirty four counts of conspiracy
Speaker 2: and tax evasion. And he got a full pardon from Trump,
Speaker 2: that's right, just before he left. So there you go.
Speaker 2: You know, that's these criminals all hang together again. The
Speaker 2: district to criminals and Washington d C. Defy the Constitution
Speaker 2: a Syrian girl. Since that quote unquote law Janine Piaut
Speaker 2: boasts about is in defiance of the US Constitution, it
Speaker 2: is at best color of law, and it has no
Speaker 2: real legal standing. That's right. It's people like Jeanine Piaut
Speaker 2: who have basically subverted the Constitution and that whole notion
Speaker 2: that even if something is in direct defiance of what
Speaker 2: is explicitly stated in the Constitution, I don't care. I've
Speaker 2: got a law here. I just gave myself the authority
Speaker 2: to override the Constitution that I swore to uphold as
Speaker 2: a condition of my office, and I think the way
Speaker 2: to I keep hammering this because I think people need
Speaker 2: to understand in America, we didn't want kings, right, and
Speaker 2: so what the people who fought the revolution seventeen seventy six,
Speaker 2: one of their slogans was no king but Jesus, and
Speaker 2: the other one that they said was lex rex, which
Speaker 2: is Latin for the law is king, and that was
Speaker 2: supposed to be what happened. And so when these people
Speaker 2: take an oath to the Constitution, what they're doing is
Speaker 2: they're saying, well, I'm going to be temporarily in this office.
Speaker 2: I'm not a king. I am a steward. The real
Speaker 2: king is the Constitution. It's kind of like, you know,
Speaker 2: Lord of the Rains, you got the stewards of Gondor
Speaker 2: who thought that they were the king, but they weren't
Speaker 2: the real king. Wonder if we're going to have a
Speaker 2: return of the king at some point, if we haven't
Speaker 2: get the Constitution back. I don't know real Jason Barker,
Speaker 2: the word permit is short for permission. I don't need permission.
Speaker 2: It's very clearly outlined as a protected right. You're absolutely right.
Speaker 2: Nice of the storm, Jason trump Berger says, I find
Speaker 2: it crazy that we are only one year into Trump's term,
Speaker 2: so much insanity packed into such a short time. Well,
Speaker 2: he is the agent of chaos, and they have to
Speaker 2: accelerate this because they're running close up to the deadline.
Speaker 2: They've got as far this fourth turning by twenty thirty,
Speaker 2: they want to have their new society in place, and
Speaker 2: so again they've got to accelerate everything. You know, the
Speaker 2: fourth Turning is that's right about the times of Fourth Turning.
Speaker 2: The guys who came up with that theory said, yeah,
Speaker 2: I think it'll kick off sometime in the mid two
Speaker 2: thousands of the global economic crisis, and it'll end probably
Speaker 2: around twenty twenty nine. And the globals say twenty thirty
Speaker 2: that's when we have our new society. It's funny how
Speaker 2: that all aligns. And so they've got to have Trump
Speaker 2: in there to accelerate the great reset real. Jason Barker says,
Speaker 2: by the law, even if you carry on private property
Speaker 2: where it's posted not to the most they can do
Speaker 2: is ask you to leave and charge with trespassing if
Speaker 2: you refuse. But in Hawaii they are pushing it further
Speaker 2: than that. That's why it's in the Supreme Court right now.
Speaker 2: He also says ghost gun is a broad term. Legally made,
Speaker 2: purchased and sold gun can be considered a ghost gun.
Speaker 2: They don't know who currently owns it, and of course
Speaker 2: that is one of the aspects of this Washington law.
Speaker 2: We didn't mention. They said, well, if you're a federal
Speaker 2: firearms licensee or whatever. There's going to be some exception
Speaker 2: to that. And I didn't really pay attention to much
Speaker 2: of it because the broad brush of what is going
Speaker 2: on here is the real key. So he says they'll
Speaker 2: use the three D printing thing to creep in and
Speaker 2: push universal background checks for regular guns. You wind up
Speaker 2: having a background check to own a three D printer,
Speaker 2: all right, I guess who knows. Bob of Atlanta says,
Speaker 2: So basically, anything you designed to print will have to
Speaker 2: be signed off on by some authority. That's right, And.
Speaker 3: As other people pointed out, right now, it's exclusively about guns,
Speaker 3: but once they have a registry of banned files, they
Speaker 3: can add any copyright stuff. If a company like Nintendo
Speaker 3: or Disney starts saying, oh, you can't print that little
Speaker 3: Pokemon figure or Mickey Mouse figure because we own the
Speaker 3: rights to that, it can now search using this algorithm
Speaker 3: to see if you've got something that's eighty percent similar
Speaker 3: to a Pikachu, like we saw with Nintendo doing with
Speaker 3: Powell World, where they had some three D models that
Speaker 3: were similar to some Pokemon models slightly, so they're you know,
Speaker 3: suing them trying to get them shut out of business.
Speaker 3: You would see the same thing against individual citizens that
Speaker 3: are trying to print any copyrighted stuff. You have to
Speaker 3: pay the royalties to them before you can print. That
Speaker 3: is not part of this yet, but that's where it's going.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I just think of it as manufacturing prohibition, right,
Speaker 2: because that's where this is really going. And they can
Speaker 2: prohibit you from manufacturing anything that they wish to prohibit
Speaker 2: you from manufacturing.
Speaker 3: And the key issue the bill is very vague about
Speaker 3: what they can ban. Its stuff that's partial components guns,
Speaker 3: so that could include things like airsoft, picatenny rails and
Speaker 3: stuff are the same as the ones that you would
Speaker 3: put on actual guns for grips attach it.
Speaker 2: So this is like bumpstock probition on steroids, right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, or and because it just has to be similar
Speaker 3: to a real gun. Even movie props often have the
Speaker 3: same dimensions as a real gun, so that could trigger
Speaker 3: the algorithm to say you're now a felon because you
Speaker 3: tried to print that blaster from the latest sci fi show.
Speaker 2: Wow Wow, that's amazing real. Jason Barker says they're also
Speaker 2: going after the file hosting places and the creators of
Speaker 2: the three D print files. Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a lawsuit going on with that. It's not
Speaker 3: part of the government pushing this out with regulation, but
Speaker 3: there is a major manufacturer, Bamboo Labs, that is trying
Speaker 3: to really restrict the distribution of three D printed files.
Speaker 2: And I don't know how that falls into the Supreme
Speaker 2: Court decision about the legality of having these files. Again,
Speaker 2: this is, like you said, it's a lawsuit as opposed
Speaker 2: to a law that is coming from some agency. So
Speaker 2: I guess that's where the difference is with that.
Speaker 3: And Bamboo Labs is a very good quality printers, but
Speaker 3: I would say avoid them, boycott them after how they
Speaker 3: seem to be going with all this stuff.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so they are the ones who are actually trying
Speaker 2: to shut down the hosting of three D print files.
Speaker 2: Well they have that seems like that'd be going against
Speaker 2: their whole business model. I mean, you want to have
Speaker 2: as many types of things out there for people to print,
Speaker 2: so people buy your printer to print them.
Speaker 3: Well, it's they have their own proprietary market of three
Speaker 3: D print files, a bunch of free stuff and a
Speaker 3: bunch of paid stuff. They had a big promotion where
Speaker 3: they were paying creators to make it so that they
Speaker 3: only host on their website. So they signed a thing like,
Speaker 3: you own the rights to this, but don't post it
Speaker 3: on thinga verse or other competitors to us. But then
Speaker 3: thing of Verse and these other competitors then downloaded a
Speaker 3: whole bunch of files and repost them on their own platforms.
Speaker 3: So that's kind of morally gray. If the files were
Speaker 3: already you know, Apache, then it's not the creators that
Speaker 3: are posting.
Speaker 2: They were already out there kind of free then, you know.
Speaker 4: So it's yeah, it's open source.
Speaker 3: It's kind of odd because a big part of this
Speaker 3: is that people have always you know, downloaded these files,
Speaker 3: tweaked it slightly. There's been a long running tradition of
Speaker 3: here's my version of so and so's things. Right, it's
Speaker 3: all open source, all community driven, and this is really
Speaker 3: trying to shut that down because if you download something
Speaker 3: that they agreed to only upload to their platform and
Speaker 3: you change it slightly and then upload to a different platform,
Speaker 3: have you broken their law their restrictions.
Speaker 2: So Bamboo Lads is trying to do some kind of
Speaker 2: a bamboo under the fingernails torture for the people by
Speaker 2: their stuff. Trump Burger says, sure they're scared of ghost guns,
Speaker 2: but wait until they find out you can get a
Speaker 2: full auto thirty col air gun sent to your door
Speaker 2: with no paperwork. Yeah, that's a key thing. There's been
Speaker 2: a lot of videos that I've seen on YouTube talking
Speaker 2: about how powerful these air guns have become, and that
Speaker 2: in almost every jurisdiction you just order you know, off
Speaker 2: Amazon or maybe hopefully a better supplier of a product
Speaker 2: or something like that, and have it shipped directly to
Speaker 2: your tour. You know, this is a major loophole because
Speaker 2: these things, many of them are so powerful, they are lethal,
Speaker 2: they're used many of them are being used for big
Speaker 2: game hunting. So I mean, if you can take down
Speaker 2: an elk, you can take down a human, right.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I was looking at hats and Vlock's handgun. That's a
Speaker 3: pre charge pneumatic air gun and it's as powerful as
Speaker 3: a twenty two, and it's quiet, and it's a handgun,
Speaker 3: and you can there's no restrictions on it.
Speaker 2: It comes almost with a built in suppressor, right because
Speaker 2: there's no explosion they're going on there. And that's one
Speaker 2: of the key things about them that you know, you
Speaker 2: can do. They've got some replicas of a lot of
Speaker 2: different handguns, so you can do practice with them. And
Speaker 2: because the ammunition has gotten so expensive, so that's something
Speaker 2: everybody want to be aware of. If you're in the farms,
Speaker 2: you can have some way to practice with the firearms
Speaker 2: and not have to waste ammunition. We're gonna take another
Speaker 2: quick break, folks, and we will be right back. Stay
Speaker 2: with us.
Speaker 6: Than anything.
Speaker 10: That the.
Speaker 1: Lady using free speech to free minds. It's the David
Speaker 1: Knight Show.
Speaker 2: Yeah, welcome back, and I appreciate you bringing that to
Speaker 2: my attention. Latest and of course Jason Barker has been
Speaker 2: talking about this for a long time because it touches
Speaker 2: on things that he's interested in as well, three D
Speaker 2: printing and firearms and that type of thing. Real Octo
Speaker 2: Spook says now that three D printing and CNC is
Speaker 2: being made crim these are as evil as weapons. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's right. You know what maybe what they should do,
Speaker 2: Lance is maybe they should have in Washington State, they
Speaker 2: should require all of the banned files to have the
Speaker 2: word Epstein and Trump in there somewhere, and the Department
Speaker 2: of Justice would make it all disappear. Problem solved. You
Speaker 2: just put Trump and Epstein together in those files and
Speaker 2: they're now instantly they disappear. They'll go straight to Pam
Speaker 2: Bondi's desk. Radisbro thank you for the tip, says old
Speaker 2: documentary called Print The legend goes over how all this started,
Speaker 2: and none other than Chuck Schumer was heavily involved in
Speaker 2: three D printing industrial industry. I have not heard of
Speaker 2: that documentary. I didn't know Chucky Schumer got involved in that. Well, anyway,
Speaker 2: I guess he's looking at this thing and saying, no,
Speaker 2: this is an opportunity for us to go after ghost guns.
Speaker 2: But the Pentagon is looking for killer AI and doesn't
Speaker 2: I want to have any safeguards you. I've been talking
Speaker 2: about this for a long time. It was probably about
Speaker 2: twelve thirteen years ago. I talked to doctor Noel Sharky,
Speaker 2: who at the time was raising the alarm about where
Speaker 2: we're going. They're going to have autonomous killer robots and
Speaker 2: killer drones. They're going to give them the ability to
Speaker 2: shoot without any human intervention. And I've also talked to
Speaker 2: I forget the guy's name. His book was The Four Battlegrounds,
Speaker 2: and he was talking about the efforts of the Pentagon
Speaker 2: to integrate artificial intelligence into war, and he said, of
Speaker 2: course it's going to naturally evolve towards getting humans out
Speaker 2: of the loop, because if you keep humans in the loop,
Speaker 2: that's going to slow it down enough that the other
Speaker 2: guy wins. So you got Warpete there, and every only
Speaker 2: thing he can talk about, he keeps coming back to lethality, lethality, lethality,
Speaker 2: How can we kill more people? Well, this is going
Speaker 2: to do it for you. Think this is when we
Speaker 2: look at this, the ability to have these unrestrained autonomous
Speaker 2: killer robots, that is a recipe for weapons of mass destruction,
Speaker 2: a new kind that we've not seen and very very dangerous.
Speaker 2: And of course it does give them a prepackaged alibi,
Speaker 2: a plausible deniability. Well it was a computer bug that
Speaker 2: killed everybody in that village or whatever. So Warpete, a
Speaker 2: Christian nationalist, vowed not to use artificial intelligence models that
Speaker 2: quote won't allow you to fight wars. And so there
Speaker 2: is a bit of a battle that is shaped up
Speaker 2: with some of these AI manufacturers. So you've got Google,
Speaker 2: and you've got you've got Musk, and you've got Nthropic
Speaker 2: that's out they're the only one that has a problem
Speaker 2: with autonomous killing machines is Anthropic. Interestingly enough, sources familiar
Speaker 2: with the dispute between warpete and Anthropic say the battle
Speaker 2: is over safeguards that would allegedly prevent the government from
Speaker 2: deploying its technology to target weapons anonymously and to conduct
Speaker 2: US domestic surveillance. And so you have the guy who
Speaker 2: is the CEO of Anthropic, who, at least on this issue,
Speaker 2: appears to be on our side. He warned that AI
Speaker 2: should support national defense quote in all ways, except those
Speaker 2: which would make us more like our autocratic adversaries. Well put,
Speaker 2: we don't want to become the monsters that we fight.
Speaker 2: And he's saying, if you use it for domestic surveillance,
Speaker 2: if you use it to have autonomous killing machines, how
Speaker 2: are we different from the people we're fighting. And that's true.
Speaker 2: It makes us really the evil ones out there. He's
Speaker 2: been very critical of what ICE is doing in terms
Speaker 2: of their tactics as well the extra judicial killings. He
Speaker 2: said the fatal shootings of US citizens protesting immigration enforcement
Speaker 2: actions in Minneapolis were a car That's right, folks, because
Speaker 2: remember what we always said about January sixth. You have
Speaker 2: an explicit constitutional protection against protests, right and the very
Speaker 2: fact that you've got like that clip that I showed earlier,
Speaker 2: you've got somebody who's setting in a car. This car
Speaker 2: is off to the side, and when you see what
Speaker 2: they're doing here with this car is off to the side,
Speaker 2: and they run over, stop whatever they're doing, and they
Speaker 2: run over, point guns to the person in there and
Speaker 2: get them out of the car, both of them. Right now,
Speaker 2: you're impeding an investigation. Why, well, because we have to
Speaker 2: stop what we're doing, come over and point guns at
Speaker 2: you or maybe kill you because you're recording us, don't
Speaker 2: you see we're wearing masks and we don't want to
Speaker 2: be recorded. We have to stop our investigation. They don't
Speaker 2: do any investigation. They're after it all. But we've got
Speaker 2: to stop what we're doing to stop you from filming us.
Speaker 2: That's how you're impeding us right anyway, An Anthropic spokesperson
Speaker 2: said the government and the company's AI said remains in
Speaker 2: productive discussions with the Department of War about ways to
Speaker 2: continue that work, but the Pentagon doesn't comment on the rift,
Speaker 2: and Thropic is one of the few major AI developers
Speaker 2: that has been awarded contracts by the Pentagon. The others
Speaker 2: were Google with alphabet and Musk's XAI and open AI. Well,
Speaker 2: those guys aren't not going to have a problem at
Speaker 2: all with the government using it for surveillance and autonomous
Speaker 2: killing machines. I'm surprised that anybody does in that crowd,
Speaker 2: but at least one company does. That's good, but not enough. Meanwhile,
Speaker 2: the Trump Department that is responsible for airline safety supposedly
Speaker 2: is going to use AI to write new regulations so
Speaker 2: that they can be t turned out as fast as possible.
Speaker 3: They were going to That's the big problem is how
Speaker 3: long it takes the government to put new laws on us.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I've talked about for decades. You know how big
Speaker 2: the Federal Registry is. We even had a situation in
Speaker 2: one event that we filmed for a political candidate that
Speaker 2: was out there and he wanted to feed the IRS
Speaker 2: code into a wood chipper, and nobody at the IRS
Speaker 2: could even tell him how many pages that would be
Speaker 2: equipalment to, and so they he got a best guest
Speaker 2: estimate of it, and he put several reams of paper
Speaker 2: together and fed them into the wood chipper and it
Speaker 2: created this massive thing of confetti. It was pretty good visual.
Speaker 2: But you know, they don't even know how many regulations
Speaker 2: are out there. And that's what I've said about the
Speaker 2: federal government and the regulations for the longest time. A
Speaker 2: law that is sufficiently complex is the same as having
Speaker 2: no law at all. It puts the bureaucrats in charge,
Speaker 2: can arbitrary, be arbitrary in terms of how they enforce
Speaker 2: these things. That's the problem with the IRS. It's a
Speaker 2: problem with many agencies now. And whoever thought that the
Speaker 2: problem was that we didn't have enough rules and regulations,
Speaker 2: Well this is according to a new investigation by Pro Publica.
Speaker 2: A top transportation agency has tapped Google Gemini to help
Speaker 2: write new regulations affecting aviation, cars, railroad and maritime safety
Speaker 2: and internal communications from DOT Attorney Daniel Cohen, agency staffers
Speaker 2: were presented with a plan along with the demonstration of
Speaker 2: AI's potential to revolutionize the way that we draft rule making. Now,
Speaker 2: I've said this all along. The intention going back to
Speaker 2: DOGE was to get rid of human bureaucrats in all
Speaker 2: these different areas and replace them with AI. And this
Speaker 2: is what it looks like, he says, We don't need
Speaker 2: the perfect rule on X, Y, Z. We don't even
Speaker 2: need a very good rule on X, Y and Z.
Speaker 2: We just need rules for people to obey. Right, doesn't
Speaker 2: have to be perfect, doesn't have to be good. So
Speaker 2: he said, according to a recent meeting and notes that
Speaker 2: we're obtained by pro Publica, we want good enough because
Speaker 2: we're going to flood the zone, flood it with what
Speaker 2: with regulations. This is the tyranny of the bureaucracy, said
Speaker 2: for the longest time, Congress doesn't write laws anymore. What
Speaker 2: they do is they create agendas, they create agencies, and
Speaker 2: then they kick it over to them to fill in
Speaker 2: the blanks. Right. Remember we've said that a lot, and
Speaker 2: when Nancy Pelosi said, well, we have to pass it
Speaker 2: to find out what's in it. Said that about Obamacare,
Speaker 2: I think it was, but it applies to everything that
Speaker 2: they do because they don't they don't follow up the details,
Speaker 2: and so now the Congress doesn't want to talk about
Speaker 2: the details. Where the devil lies in terms of any
Speaker 2: of these agendas. They just create these things and kick
Speaker 2: it over to an agency that already exists, or they
Speaker 2: create a new agency and they say, you fill in
Speaker 2: all this stuff, and so our laws and regulations are
Speaker 2: not being written by humans already, they're being written by bureaucrats,
Speaker 2: and so now they're going to replace those human bureaucrats
Speaker 2: with AI. It gets even worse. So now Congress has
Speaker 2: abdicated their responsibility, and now the human bureaucrats are abdicating
Speaker 2: their responsibility. Even how bad is it going to get
Speaker 2: because we don't really care whether it's perfect, We don't
Speaker 2: even care if it's good. We just need to flood
Speaker 2: everybody with regulations. That's their goal. And the worst thing
Speaker 2: about this is I pointed out, how do we get
Speaker 2: to the situation where you've got civil asset forfeiture? Why
Speaker 2: they call it civil asset forfeiture? Well, they're not calling
Speaker 2: it criminal law because in criminal law you have some
Speaker 2: procedures that are outlined there in the Constitution, and they
Speaker 2: don't want to directly go up against it, find a
Speaker 2: devious workaround, just like we were talking about before, when
Speaker 2: they do censorship, they say, well, this is not a
Speaker 2: law because it wasn't passed by Congress. This is a
Speaker 2: rule that came from the bureaucracy. And because it's a rule,
Speaker 2: you don't have any protection like you would a law.
Speaker 2: You see how they prevaricate around those things. You and
Speaker 2: I don't see any difference between a rule or law.
Speaker 2: Both of them can get you a fine if you
Speaker 2: violate them. Both of them can send you to jail.
Speaker 2: But they make this artificial distinction between a rule and
Speaker 2: a law and then say, well, because it's a rule
Speaker 2: and not a law, you don't have a presumption of innocence,
Speaker 2: and you don't have to even be found guilty. You
Speaker 2: don't even have to be charged. We can just say
Speaker 2: your property violated a rule and we can steal your property.
Speaker 2: This is how absurd it's all becoming. Now they're going
Speaker 2: to take it to another level of artificiality by saying
Speaker 2: these rules are going to be created by AI, and
Speaker 2: we've got to get as many of them out as possible.
Speaker 2: We've got a flood the zone with US stuff. You
Speaker 2: noted the enthusiasm for the Department transportations. AI. Trump is
Speaker 2: very excited about this initiative. So the guys who are
Speaker 2: doing this presentation that Pro Publica got the information on
Speaker 2: six dot workers contacted Pro Publica anonymously. They were very
Speaker 2: upset about this, and of course, look, their jobs are
Speaker 2: on the line. Who needs them right, They're going to
Speaker 2: let AI write the rules. They said. The typical regulation
Speaker 2: writing can take months, sometimes years due to complications involved,
Speaker 2: But at the demonstration in December, a presenter told them
Speaker 2: that Google's Gemini could cut that down to minutes or
Speaker 2: even seconds. Think about the explosion of rules that we're
Speaker 2: going to get. I mean talking about shrip wires that
Speaker 2: are going to send you to jail or take everything
Speaker 2: you got. This is a prescription for nightmare. So again,
Speaker 2: you know, it takes longer than months or years. When
Speaker 2: Congress does it, they send it to the bureaucracy and
Speaker 2: they can do it, you know, a little bit faster
Speaker 2: than that. Now we're going to do it in minutes
Speaker 2: or seconds. Imagine how the Federal Registry is going to
Speaker 2: explode to that kind of an attitude, And that's the
Speaker 2: attitude coming from the.
Speaker 3: Top, to a variation of the Schoolhouse Rock. How does
Speaker 3: a bill become law? Well, the AI just decides how
Speaker 3: does the bill become law? You just see the text scrolling.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's right, I have it's a proper we prompted.
Speaker 2: That's that's what I've said for a long time. We
Speaker 2: needed to redo that you know, I'm a bill, I'm
Speaker 2: a bill on Capitol Hill, and I think we need
Speaker 2: to redo that to show how it's really done with bureaucracies.
Speaker 2: And now even that idea is outdated. Isn't at lance.
Speaker 4: Straight?
Speaker 3: How they're going to use ALI to.
Speaker 2: The dot's former Chief AI officer, Mike Horton compared the
Speaker 2: plan to quote, having a high school intern that's doing
Speaker 2: your rulemaking. Well, they don't care. The intention is to
Speaker 2: flood the zone with rules and trip wires to get
Speaker 2: you in trouble. You know, ELSA is going to have
Speaker 2: to rewrite. What they're doing is Harvey Silverglate has three
Speaker 2: felonies a day, so it's got three hundred a day probably.
Speaker 3: So we have all the stories of the AI attorneys
Speaker 3: making up case law. Now they can just make it
Speaker 3: up and make it legal.
Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
Speaker 4: We found the perfect solution.
Speaker 2: That's right. So now they're going to be hallucinating regulations
Speaker 2: for us. Wake me up from this nightmare. Gemini has
Speaker 2: been linked to another number of embarrassing episodes, like hallucinating
Speaker 2: marriages that don't exist, are making up dangerous medical information.
Speaker 2: So now we're going to put them in charge of
Speaker 2: autonomous killing machines, and we're going to put them in
Speaker 2: charge of autonomous rulemaking, which I guess is kind of
Speaker 2: the same thing, you know, regulations that kill us in
Speaker 2: every way imaginable. Speaking of that, we have Waymo's school
Speaker 2: bus situation just got a lot worse. Oh by the way,
Speaker 2: thank you, Spencer DeLong, thank you for the gift of
Speaker 2: the sub on kick, he says David Lance. I am
Speaker 2: a C and C machinist in Ohio. I work with
Speaker 2: pumps now, but primarily the auto industry, and I work
Speaker 2: for John Deere in the past. The most dangerous part
Speaker 2: of the legislation is the aftermarket car parts. Limiting three
Speaker 2: D printers and CNC machines sets the precedent that will
Speaker 2: eventually restrict the manufacture of auto parts. They'll make repairing
Speaker 2: older and likely paid off cars even more difficult, especially
Speaker 2: once parts are discontinued by the OEM. You'll own nothing
Speaker 2: and be happy. That's a very important aspect of this
Speaker 2: as well. Thank you for pointing that out, Spencer. Yeah,
Speaker 2: the the you know, you look at Jay Leno and
Speaker 2: all the old car parts that he's got. He's been
Speaker 2: making his own car parts with CNC and three D
Speaker 2: printers and stuff like that for a very long time
Speaker 2: because you can't get him anywhere. You know, he's got
Speaker 2: a car that's sixty years old, some of them older
Speaker 2: than that. There's nobody making those car parts out there,
Speaker 2: but probably somebody is going to own the copyright and
Speaker 2: they will make sure they keep extending these copyrights and
Speaker 2: these patents. They'll make sure that you can't print it,
Speaker 2: even though they don't want to do it, and the
Speaker 2: government will make sure of that as well. So that's
Speaker 2: the key thing. That's the way that you're going to
Speaker 2: be able to keep your cars going. They want to
Speaker 2: shut that down as well. Speech, self defense, and mobility.
Speaker 2: Those are the things that they're going for. You stop
Speaker 2: and think about it. Does this look like a war?
Speaker 2: You know, what do you do with a war? First
Speaker 2: of all, you take down the communications, You go after
Speaker 2: the speech, right, you want to isolate the enemy, and
Speaker 2: then you come after their food supply, you come after
Speaker 2: their mobility. So you take down their communications, you restrict
Speaker 2: their mobility, you take away their food. I think they're
Speaker 2: at war with us. Well. The school bus situation with Waimo.
Speaker 2: They said they've had a lot of situations, especially in Austin,
Speaker 2: but it's also been in Georgia as well, where they've
Speaker 2: rolled out their cars. There's a probe that it makes
Speaker 2: the NTSB the second regulator to investigate Weimo and the
Speaker 2: behavior of its robotaxis around school buses, after the National
Speaker 2: Highway Traffic Safety Administration launched its own probe last October.
Speaker 2: At least six reported in Atlanta, Georgia, as well as
Speaker 2: Weimo's ignore the buses, flashing lights and the extended stop arm.
Speaker 2: This is the kind of thing that would be major
Speaker 2: penalties for human drivers, but of course they're going to
Speaker 2: look the other way because this is a robotaxi. You know,
Speaker 2: we don't really care about the lives of children so
Speaker 2: much if it's Google that's threatening them. No serious collisions
Speaker 2: or injuries have been reported yet, but in at least
Speaker 2: one incident, a Weimo drove right by the students who
Speaker 2: were disembarking from the bus, and December, Weimo issued a
Speaker 2: voluntary software recall for over three thousand of its fifth
Speaker 2: generation vehicles to address the same issue in Austin. Excuse me.
Speaker 2: In Austin school District's claim at least one violation out
Speaker 2: of the patch had been applied, suggesting it didn't work.
Speaker 2: So when you look at the comical things that WIMO
Speaker 2: has been involved in, comical failures. They had been spotted
Speaker 2: driving on the wrong side of the road, getting stuck
Speaker 2: in a roundabout, blowing through police standoffs, driving on light
Speaker 2: rail tracks as if it was a rail car. It's
Speaker 2: also stoked in tense community backlash when in one particular
Speaker 2: area killed a beloved Badega cat. They always mentioned that one.
Speaker 2: But the company's biggest nafoo came last month when seemingly
Speaker 2: the entire San Francisco fleet suddenly forgot how to drive
Speaker 2: after the city experienced a power outage, causing the cars
Speaker 2: to stop in the middle of the roads and to
Speaker 2: clog up busy intersections. That's exactly right. Well, you know,
Speaker 2: when you talk about the on bill stuff and where
Speaker 2: this is all headed, I think that is a huge
Speaker 2: part of it. They have tried to control the aftermarket
Speaker 2: for a lot of different things through California's what is it,
Speaker 2: It's a CARB regulation is what they call it, and
Speaker 2: California Air Resources Board. And so I know when I
Speaker 2: was doing aftermarket modifications to the MIATA, there were a
Speaker 2: lot of things. Even though the people that were making
Speaker 2: this stuff, for the most part, were in California, where
Speaker 2: there was used to be a vibrant car culture. Now
Speaker 2: carb was shutting it down and say we can't sell
Speaker 2: this to anybody if you live in California. We can
Speaker 2: only do it mail order that type of thing. And
Speaker 2: so you better believe that states like Washington State, New York,
Speaker 2: and California are going to use those three D printer
Speaker 2: restrictions to keep you from getting car parks. Just like
Speaker 2: Spencer said, what was the name of the bill? Let
Speaker 2: me get that name of the bill, like I should
Speaker 2: have mentioned that before, you know. Just on second full.
Speaker 4: House billed two three to one.
Speaker 2: Okay, good, that's very good. Yeah, House build twenty three
Speaker 2: to twenty one in Washington State, introduced in January, just
Speaker 2: introduced this year, and they're going to kick these things
Speaker 2: in they say by July first, twenty twenty seven. I
Speaker 2: don't know that three D printers could manufacturers could make
Speaker 2: these changes that quickly, So just stop them from being
Speaker 2: sold completely.
Speaker 3: I guess I mentioned Bamboo Labs. They already kind of
Speaker 3: have a system, oh yet up where you upload your
Speaker 3: files to their server and then it goes to your printer,
Speaker 3: but you can actually use land only. They had something
Speaker 3: where they switched to that and everyone got really annoyed,
Speaker 3: but they specified, no, don't worry, we're not taking away
Speaker 3: land only yet. But this would require them to remove
Speaker 3: the land only option.
Speaker 2: Wow. Wow, it's amazing. Well, Kuda Being says, I would
Speaker 2: throw so much money at a semi automatic crossbow.
Speaker 4: That it exists.
Speaker 3: There's the sliding instant legless bow by George spra If
Speaker 3: you can look that up.
Speaker 2: Yeah, there you go. Yeah, look at that. Lick that
Speaker 2: up on YouTube. That's they kind of got that out
Speaker 2: there already. I don't know if he's selling it or not. Yea,
Speaker 2: oh he is. Okay, be my Valentine. Little boys that
Speaker 2: chew their toast into the shape of a gun subject
Speaker 2: to arrest, that's right. Well, we've had situations where they
Speaker 2: did that. They came after some kids because they ate
Speaker 2: their toast in the shape of a gun or the
Speaker 2: crackers or something like that. I wonder how long it's
Speaker 2: going to be before they start resting kids who go
Speaker 2: pew pew with a finger. I imagined they've already done
Speaker 2: that in some school districts as well. Those schools should
Speaker 2: be given the finger if anybody deserves it. Okay, we'll
Speaker 2: be right back.
Speaker 10: Folks.
Speaker 1: Defending the American dream. You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2: All right, welcome back. And I said at the beginning
Speaker 2: of the show that there's some very interesting connections that
Speaker 2: are found in the Epstein files because he's embedded in
Speaker 2: this network of elite criminals that are not only pedophiles,
Speaker 2: but they've been working as to how they are going
Speaker 2: to reorganize and reset society. And he was embedded in
Speaker 2: right in the center of these people. And so there's
Speaker 2: some interesting information about how he was embedded in the
Speaker 2: pandemic planning as well as in the planning and facilitation
Speaker 2: of bitcoin as well, has come out of these files.
Speaker 2: Sayer g, who is someone who spends a lot of
Speaker 2: time talking about alternatives to the Rockefeller medicine system, said,
Speaker 2: buried inside these documents is some very amazing information. A
Speaker 2: blueprint for the twenty year financial architecture that was designed
Speaker 2: to turn Pandemics into a profit center. Offshore vaccine funds,
Speaker 2: pandemic insurance triggers, donor advised fund structures designed to profit
Speaker 2: under the cover of charity simulation programs, career, pipelines into
Speaker 2: pharma and into the World Economic Forum. All this was
Speaker 2: built years before COVID nineteen. All of it was running
Speaker 2: through gates JP, Morgan and Epstein. And of course Epstein
Speaker 2: was at the epicenter of a lot of these criminal
Speaker 2: banking industries, the Rothschilds, the Goldman Sacks people. He's got
Speaker 2: an attorney at Goldman Sachs. Her name was Rumler, and
Speaker 2: she was getting gifts from Jeffrey Epstein. Like I think
Speaker 2: it's like a nine ten thousand dollars handbag and a
Speaker 2: twelve hundred dollars Apple watch, because it had some particular
Speaker 2: designer redesign, you know, some brand name designer for the
Speaker 2: handbag as well as the Apple watch. Don't envy these
Speaker 2: rich people. They're so stupid they spend ten thousand dollars bags.
Speaker 2: What is it must be a really good handbag, but
Speaker 2: it's you can now get them for only like five
Speaker 2: thousand dollars. They'd appreciate pretty quickly, evidently, So this is how,
Speaker 2: of course Milania does the same type of thing. In
Speaker 2: August of twenty eleven, Jeffrey Epstein mailed emailed Mary Urdoz,
Speaker 2: the CEO of JP Morgan's two trillion dollar asset management
Speaker 2: to be outlining a Gates linked donor advised fund. He said,
Speaker 2: we should be ready with an offshore arm, especially for vaccines.
Speaker 2: And of course they weren't concerned at JP Morgan about
Speaker 2: doing business with a convicted pedophile at all. That didn't
Speaker 2: bother them, And he's got a shot of the email there.
Speaker 2: So he said, we need to have an offshore arm,
Speaker 2: especially for vaccines. And he said the tension is making
Speaker 2: money from a charitable organization. Therefore the money making parts
Speaker 2: need to be at arm's length. And of course this
Speaker 2: is the thing. Bill Gates always bristles at the fact
Speaker 2: that people saying he's doing this stuff to make money.
Speaker 2: He says, I've got a charitable organization, I'm donating this
Speaker 2: stuff to it. Well, right here you see in these
Speaker 2: emails going back and forth between these banks and between
Speaker 2: Bill Gates. How do we make money out of this
Speaker 2: charitable organization. We've got to structure that carefully so it
Speaker 2: can be this charitable organization can be a profit center
Speaker 2: for us. So the architecture of the structure a convicted
Speaker 2: The architect of it brother is a convicted sex crime pedophile.
Speaker 2: Explicitly acknowledging that the vehicle is designed to generate profit
Speaker 2: on the legal cover of being a charity, which is
Speaker 2: what people have said all along about Bill Gates. Here
Speaker 2: it is in the emails. Boris Nikolik, Bill Gates, chief
Speaker 2: Science Technology advisor emailed Epstein and Gates about the donor
Speaker 2: advised funds and writes it might be a great path
Speaker 2: forward for some key areas like energy and pandemic, etc.
Speaker 2: Now again, remember these are things that Bill Gates puts
Speaker 2: himself out as a altruistic philanthropist. Right, I'm just doing
Speaker 2: this to help people. I've said this from the very
Speaker 2: beginning about the green grift that is out there. This
Speaker 2: is really has been a play on making money out
Speaker 2: of alterative forms of energy, basically mandating them, you know,
Speaker 2: the renewable energy mandates of solar and wind and other
Speaker 2: things like that. And they've got a lot of different
Speaker 2: ways that they can make money out of the energy stuff.
Speaker 2: And of course the pandemic was the same thing. He
Speaker 2: points out, they're not talking about this as being a
Speaker 2: response to an emergency. This is a strategy for an
Speaker 2: investment portfolio. That's the key thing. And he goes on
Speaker 2: In the email, he says, join Swiss RI, which is
Speaker 2: an reinsurance team. He said, we did one for pandemics.
Speaker 2: It helped to develop pandemic triggers. I'm sorry, a parametric triggers.
Speaker 2: A parametric trigger is a financial instrument for automatically paying
Speaker 2: out when a pandemic is declared, is developed by somebody
Speaker 2: in Epstein's career placement network. Six months later, the World
Speaker 2: Bank issued as first ever pandemic catastrophe bonds, and guess
Speaker 2: who issued them. The same bank that Jeffrey up Epstein
Speaker 2: was recommending Swiss ra with exactly these triggers, and coronavirus
Speaker 2: was listed as a peril that they would be doing
Speaker 2: pandemic bonds for. So these people basically make money. It's
Speaker 2: kind of like, see, what is that prediction market that
Speaker 2: everybody's betting things on? But you know, Wall Street is
Speaker 2: a casino, and just like you've got bookies who will
Speaker 2: take bets on anything, that's what they're doing with these bonds.
Speaker 2: They're basically taking bets on anything. So they set this
Speaker 2: thing up used exactly the same people, the same mechanism
Speaker 2: that had been designed by the people that were working
Speaker 2: with Jeffrey Epstein, Yes, did you say something?
Speaker 10: Oh?
Speaker 2: Okay. An agreement letter that was addressed to Gates states
Speaker 2: at Gates specifically requested that Jeffrey Epstein quote personally serve
Speaker 2: as a representative of Boris Nikolic, who is Bill gates
Speaker 2: chief science and technology advisor. So Gates had access to
Speaker 2: every law firm, every advisor, every institution on Earth, but
Speaker 2: he chose Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender. And of
Speaker 2: course we know you know. It's not what you know,
Speaker 2: it's who you know. And Melinda Gates was asked about
Speaker 2: the aspect of the report that came out of some
Speaker 2: of these emails in terms of Bill Gates having apparently
Speaker 2: contracted a sexually transmitted disease and how he was asking
Speaker 2: for help as to how he could slip a mickey
Speaker 2: to his wife so she an antibiotic basically so she
Speaker 2: wouldn't know. And Melinda Gates had this to say.
Speaker 5: Emails in the file suggest that Bill Gates had additional
Speaker 5: affairs and that he tried to get medication to treat
Speaker 5: a sexually transmitted infection, and that he was going to
Speaker 5: give you the medicine without you knowing. His representative has
Speaker 5: said all of this is false. It is not on
Speaker 5: you to have to respond to the de tales of
Speaker 5: that alleged behavior. But I wonder what your dominant emotion
Speaker 5: is when you read these news articles with these details.
Speaker 9: Sad just unbelievable sadness. Unbelievable sadness. Right, And again I'm
Speaker 9: able to take my own sadness and look at those
Speaker 9: young girls and say, my god, how did they have
Speaker 9: How did that happen to those girls?
Speaker 2: Right?
Speaker 9: And so for me, it's just sadness, sadness. For you know,
Speaker 9: I've left, I had, I left my marriage. I had
Speaker 9: to leave my marriage. I wanted to leave my marriage,
Speaker 9: I had to leave the fat I felt I needed
Speaker 9: to eventually leave the foundation. So it's just sad, that's
Speaker 9: the truth, right, And it's kind of like h At
Speaker 9: least for me, I've been able to move on in life.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you know the foundation that helped to make her
Speaker 2: so rich because they were using it as a profit center.
Speaker 2: And so how do I feel about all this pandemic
Speaker 2: stuff that they did. Well, I feel like her. I
Speaker 2: feel sad. It was a giant rape of society, folks
Speaker 2: and murder. It was a snuff film. This pandemic simulation stuff,
Speaker 2: pandemic simulation, vaccine gatekeeping, and sexually transmitted disease Gates and
Speaker 2: Epstein Ties was Gates leveraging Epstein's shadowy network for global
Speaker 2: health dominance. This is from Marte. By the way, the
Speaker 2: disclosures weren't answers from the multi billionaire Microsoft co founder
Speaker 2: turned quote unquote philanthropist. His foundation wheels outsized influence on
Speaker 2: worldwide vaccination and data systems. His role in global vaccine
Speaker 2: distribution was amplified by accusations from the CEO of Russia's
Speaker 2: Direct Investment Fund. This guy, Carill Dimitriev is very upset
Speaker 2: that Gates cut out the Russian vaccines because you know,
Speaker 2: this is all just about money, right, This isn't all
Speaker 2: so they're worried that they get cut out of this thing.
Speaker 2: Dimitria has accusations against Gates echo broader criticisms of GAVY,
Speaker 2: the Global Vaccine Alliance that Gates granted seven hundred and
Speaker 2: fifty million dollars two in two thousand. GAVVY claims that
Speaker 2: it pools funds from governments, in philanthropists, and industry to
Speaker 2: buy and to distribute vaccines to low income countries. Detractors
Speaker 2: argue that it's dominated by the Gates Foundation, which Melinda
Speaker 2: Gates was a part of at that time, it's largest
Speaker 2: private donor, and that it prioritizes selling expensive new vaccines
Speaker 2: instead of actually providing healthcare. So that's one way that
Speaker 2: you can monetize this, right. You create this this fund,
Speaker 2: this charitable fund, this philanthropic fund, and they're going to
Speaker 2: give vaccines to people, and people can donate to them,
Speaker 2: and they're going to buy the for profit vaccines that
Speaker 2: are out there. Department of Justice files also show Gates
Speaker 2: discussing polio eradication in Pakistan and Afghanistan with input from Epstein.
Speaker 2: The disgraced financier had no health expertise, says RT. Guess
Speaker 2: what neither does Bill Gates. They both were involved, however,
Speaker 2: in geopolitics and massive financial grifts, because that's what this
Speaker 2: all was about. And of course they were all involved
Speaker 2: in an Event to one, one of the final ones
Speaker 2: of all these different Dark Winter Germ games that began
Speaker 2: first one two months before nine to eleven, and so
Speaker 2: Event to one in twenty nineteen. He had World Economic Forum,
Speaker 2: Bill Gates, JOHNS. Hopkins. Epstein had his finger in that
Speaker 2: as well collaborated with Bill Gates on that simulation that year.
Speaker 2: And so when you look at all of this, it's
Speaker 2: not just slipping antibiotics to his wife Melinda, but he
Speaker 2: was also purportedly buying adderall for his bridge tournaments. And
Speaker 2: this guy who was so motivated to win at a
Speaker 2: bridge tournament that he's going to take a drug stimulant
Speaker 2: that's going to help him do that. It's pretty amazing.
Speaker 2: But getting ready for the next pandemic. This is the
Speaker 2: World Health Organization quietly coordinating large scale simulations. They're simulating
Speaker 2: it again with thirty one different countries. World Health Organization
Speaker 2: is quietly coordinating this large scale pandemic simulation. They're getting ready,
Speaker 2: they said, for the next pandemic. They're not saying they're
Speaker 2: getting ready in case of a pandemic. They're saying they're
Speaker 2: getting ready for the next pandemic. There's going to be
Speaker 2: a next one. Why Because we didn't do anything to
Speaker 2: punish these criminals. They got away with it. Look at Trump,
Speaker 2: it's one of the worst ones. With all this stuff.
Speaker 2: Nothing happened. And this is being reported by WND, which
Speaker 2: is one of the biggest cheerleaders of all things Trump. Well,
Speaker 2: you might want to ask why letting Trump and all
Speaker 2: these people who are involved in this get away with it.
Speaker 2: How does that set up the next pandemic? It sets
Speaker 2: it up even more so than a simulation. So the
Speaker 2: WHL publicized this exercise on Facebook. They said, we're getting
Speaker 2: ready for the next pandemic. Thirty one countries in areas
Speaker 2: from across the Western Pacific participated in the IHR exercise
Speaker 2: Crystal to test readiness for the future. The WHA did
Speaker 2: not describe the drill as preparation for a hypothetical scenario.
Speaker 2: He repeatedly referred to the readiness for the quote unquote
Speaker 2: next pandemic. You think it's over, they're already rehearsing for
Speaker 2: the sequel because they got away with it. And so,
Speaker 2: while we're on the Jeffrey Epstein's stuff, it's kind of
Speaker 2: interesting that Todd Blanche, as I pointed out, was the
Speaker 2: personal attorney for Donald Trump, defending him always, and he
Speaker 2: was the guy who went down and had the extensive
Speaker 2: interview with Glaine Maxwell and then she was transferred to
Speaker 2: a club fed prison. Well, he had an interesting quote.
Speaker 2: He said, it isn't a crime to party with mister
Speaker 2: Epstein really so, I guess it's not a crime to
Speaker 2: send him emails either. It's not a crime to conspire
Speaker 2: to set up pandemics and profit from them. It's not
Speaker 2: a crime to get involved with the conspiracies that had
Speaker 2: around bitcoin and how they could control the different aspects
Speaker 2: of it. And there's a very interesting article I hope
Speaker 2: I have time to get to it today about that.
Speaker 2: A lot of people say, well, you know bitcoin, it's
Speaker 2: open source, and you know you can't hack into it
Speaker 2: and all this kind of stuff. That's not the way
Speaker 2: they hack into these things. They hack into things by
Speaker 2: eliminating other alternatives and by pushing one thing. And they
Speaker 2: have the financial infrastructure and the surrounding people and organizations
Speaker 2: to manipulate this stuff. They don't have to actually break
Speaker 2: into the code. That is absolutely meaningless. That is kind
Speaker 2: of an engineering perspective of that. You have to take
Speaker 2: a financial systems perspective of bitcoin to see where the
Speaker 2: real criminality is. But anyway, he says, it isn't a
Speaker 2: crime to party with mister Epstein. Really well, I would
Speaker 2: just say show me your friends and I'll tell you
Speaker 2: who you are. Right. That's the old phrase that we've
Speaker 2: always heard, and it's pretty much true. And if you
Speaker 2: are partying with Jeffrey Epstein like Donald Trump did for
Speaker 2: a very long time, if you are working with him
Speaker 2: post conviction, even like Steve Bannon on how to do
Speaker 2: pr to bring back his image, what does that say
Speaker 2: about you?
Speaker 3: Plus, it very much is a crime to do the
Speaker 3: sort of partying that they were doing with underaged girls
Speaker 3: at the Epstein parties.
Speaker 2: That's right, that's right.
Speaker 3: It's not the party made it illegal.
Speaker 4: It's the underaged girls and everything else.
Speaker 2: And when you look at these pictures, like I haven't
Speaker 2: put these pictures up because they're just absolutely disgusting, blurred
Speaker 2: out faces of very very young girls that he is
Speaker 2: got on his lap, or various other things like that,
Speaker 2: like the ones that Prince Andrew he's got a young
Speaker 2: girl that he is on she's laying flat on her back,
Speaker 2: don't even know because her face is blurred out, don't
Speaker 2: even know if she's conscious or not, and he's on
Speaker 2: his hands and knees over her. I mean, it is
Speaker 2: disgusting what these people are doing. And in light of
Speaker 2: all that, this should be the final nail in the
Speaker 2: coffin for Todd Blanche to say something like this. This
Speaker 2: is his excuse, And of course it's amazing to see
Speaker 2: how Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro's saying, just move on.
Speaker 2: We don't need to talk about this, this Epstein stuff anymore.
Speaker 2: Enough of that, right, you can't waste our time on
Speaker 2: Epstein and other stuff that are going on here that
Speaker 2: some people want us to find. Mike Johnson's on and
Speaker 2: has said, yes, yes, it's so disturbing, is it. They're
Speaker 2: focus on who we are, what we're doing, where we
Speaker 2: want to take the country. That's what Epstein tells us.
Speaker 2: It tells us who you are, just speaker, God tells
Speaker 2: us who Mike Johnson and Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro are.
Speaker 3: Mark, Thanks for all you do, go blass.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, it tells us exactly what they are. Show
Speaker 2: me your friends and I'll tell you who you are.
Speaker 2: Masad Jeffrey Epstein nettan Yahoo. I'll never say no, he says,
Speaker 2: we will always investigate any evidence of misconduct. But you know,
Speaker 2: it's not a crime to party with Epstein. So as
Speaker 2: horrible as it is, it's not a crime to email
Speaker 2: with mister Epstein. Well, no, that's pulling it out and
Speaker 2: ignoring the content of the emails, ignoring the content of
Speaker 2: the parties, and Laura Ingram interrupted to say, that's all
Speaker 2: that was going on in some of those place, just
Speaker 2: a party. If the photos could speak, some of them
Speaker 2: would look pretty bad, she said. He said, that's right,
Speaker 2: and unfortunately photos can't speak.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 2: I think they shout reams. I think they're worth a
Speaker 2: thousand screams. Trump's name also appears on more than three
Speaker 2: thousand times in the files, along with Clinton and others.
Speaker 2: And he pitched a lot of opportunities and post kup
Speaker 2: Ukraine to Rothschild's executives as well. He's at the center
Speaker 2: of that. How can we profit from that?
Speaker 3: And that's how many times his name appears, And we
Speaker 3: have no idea how many times it's been reducted, as
Speaker 3: you have in the board. The people's names are being redacted.
Speaker 2: That's right. So going back to twenty fourteen, right after
Speaker 2: the CIA coup again, as I said, the connections of
Speaker 2: Epstein with the intelligence agencies and all the rest of stuff,
Speaker 2: and right after the CIA orchestrated coup in twenty fourteen,
Speaker 2: he starts contacting the ross Child Aaron de Rothschild, head
Speaker 2: of the Swiss private banking firm Edmund de Rothschild Group
Speaker 2: and talking about how they can make money off Ukraine.
Speaker 2: He said in March twenty fourteen email exchange with the
Speaker 2: Rothschilds he wanted to discuss Ukraine in an upcoming meeting.
Speaker 2: Epstein's reply said Ukraine upheaval should provide many opportunities Comma many,
Speaker 2: so he emphasized that by putting it there twice. In
Speaker 2: twenty fifteen, after she became the CEO of the Rothschild Group,
Speaker 2: she negotiated twenty five million dollar contract with Epstein for
Speaker 2: quote risk analysis and the application and use of certain
Speaker 2: algorithms for the bank. In twenty thirteen, she asked for
Speaker 2: he asked for her help and hiring a female personal assistant,
Speaker 2: whom he said should be multi lingual and organized and
Speaker 2: especially female. Right so. Epstein also put de Roschild, who
Speaker 2: married into the Swiss banking family in nineteen ninety nine,
Speaker 2: put her in touch with Catherine Rumler. This is the
Speaker 2: Goldman Sachs partner that I talked about, and she's the
Speaker 2: one who's getting the ten thousand dollars person a two
Speaker 2: thousand dollars apple watch from Jeffrey Epstein I'm sending over
Speaker 2: somebody with a bottle of wine and this and that.
Speaker 2: I mean he was always sending her gifts. She was
Speaker 2: something of a female assistant, I guess. But the real
Speaker 2: issue here, also in terms of Jeffrey Epstein, is this
Speaker 2: who really built bitcoin? This is a thread on Twitter
Speaker 2: if you want to find it. You don't have time
Speaker 2: to talk about all of it today, but it's a
Speaker 2: jungle inc. Crypto News was a personally put this out.
Speaker 2: He says, if you think that bitcoin was built by
Speaker 2: cyberpunks in the basement, you haven't read these files. The
Speaker 2: recent dump of over three million pages about Epstein is
Speaker 2: showing the architecture of capture that is so sophisticated. The
Speaker 2: most people defending bitcoin don't even realize they're defending the
Speaker 2: very system they thought they were escaping. This isn't a
Speaker 2: hit piece on bitcoin. This is about pattern recognition and
Speaker 2: how the elite networks capture emerging technologies at their most
Speaker 2: vulnerable moments. And you'll spend your entire life believing in
Speaker 2: revolutions that were managed from the very beginning. If you
Speaker 2: don't understand that the quote unquote decentralized future of money
Speaker 2: was funded shaped and guided by one of the most
Speaker 2: connected sex offenders in modern history, and the exact same
Speaker 2: legacy power networks that cryptocurrency claimed to disrupt, not through
Speaker 2: coded back doors, but through something that is far more effective,
Speaker 2: infrastructure bottlenecks. They didn't need a backdoor into the code.
Speaker 2: All they needed was to be able to control everything
Speaker 2: around it. He said. You'll hear from people all the
Speaker 2: time the code is open source, it can't be controlled. Well,
Speaker 2: that misses the entire point. Nobody needed to corrupt bitcoins coin.
Speaker 2: They just need to control everything around it, the infrastructure
Speaker 2: around it, for example, who could access capital to build
Speaker 2: on it, which projects would get listed on which exchanges
Speaker 2: and so forth, and what the media narratives would say
Speaker 2: about it, what the regulators went after, which developers got paid,
Speaker 2: which academic institutions legitimized it. The Epstein network positioned itself
Speaker 2: at every single one of these bottlenecks. For example, you
Speaker 2: know which projects are going to get listed on exchange.
Speaker 2: He got involved in coinbase, and they're the ones who
Speaker 2: can make or break any kind of crypto that is
Speaker 2: out there. So that type of thing is how they
Speaker 2: exercise their control. And so he says They don't do
Speaker 2: it loudly or obviously. They do it quietly, methodically, through
Speaker 2: the exact same mechanisms of elite influence that they've used
Speaker 2: in every other domain. So again, when you look at
Speaker 2: what these people are doing, yes, you know the intelligence
Speaker 2: agencies want to be able to blackmail and control people,
Speaker 2: but another means of control is going to be the
Speaker 2: money that's there. But that's why this all pulls together,
Speaker 2: all this forbidden sex, because pedophilia is one of the
Speaker 2: few forbidden sex things that exists in Western society anymore,
Speaker 2: and so they go for that, and that's an instrument
Speaker 2: of control. So how did Epstein get his money into
Speaker 2: your so called decentralized on ramp? So records confirm that
Speaker 2: Epstein invested about three million dollars in coinbase December twenty
Speaker 2: fourteen and when it was valued at four hundred million dollars.
Speaker 2: So it's less than one percent, but he got a
Speaker 2: lot of leverage because he knew the people in charge.
Speaker 2: Fred Ersam coin based co founder knew that the money
Speaker 2: came from Epstein, and they're emailing each other. He says,
Speaker 2: I've got a gap between noon and three pm today,
Speaker 2: would it be nice to meet if it's convenient. So
Speaker 2: so why this matters. It's about a lot more than
Speaker 2: just the dollar amount, you know, the less than one
Speaker 2: percent three million dollars into a company that has a
Speaker 2: four hundred million dollar valuation. So they decided which tokens
Speaker 2: got mainstream legitimacy, which projects could access retail capital, which
Speaker 2: assets institutions could buy. Coinbase became the regulated gateway between
Speaker 2: traditional finance and crypto. When Coinbase issued listed a token,
Speaker 2: the price was pumped, and when they didn't list a token,
Speaker 2: projects died in obscurity. A single exchange wielding this much
Speaker 2: power over a quote unquote decentralized ecosystem which is not
Speaker 2: is a very definition of a centralized control point. And
Speaker 2: at the foundation of that exchange money and relationships from
Speaker 2: a convicted sex offender and his network. Not exactly the
Speaker 2: cyberpunk origin story that they marketed, and so the all
Speaker 2: this warfare was not organic, It was all engineered from
Speaker 2: the very beginning. There was an email between Austin Hill
Speaker 2: of the Blockstream co founder and CEO, sends an email
Speaker 2: to Jeffrey Epstein at the MIT Media Lab says why
Speaker 2: supporting Ripple and Stellar is bad for the ecosystem that
Speaker 2: we are building. Bill argues that that backing competing blockchain
Speaker 2: architectures creates irreconcilable, strategic and reputational conflicts. These projects threaten
Speaker 2: our business model. We need them eliminated from the funding pool,
Speaker 2: he says in the translation. So what happened next wasn't
Speaker 2: a coincidence. Suddenly the cryptospace experienced a coordinated narrative shift.
Speaker 2: You had alternative blockchains labeled not truly decentralized, or they
Speaker 2: were called corporate coins or pre mind scams, regardless of
Speaker 2: the actual technical merit. So there was a technical dismissal.
Speaker 2: Then there was an ideological purity test. Bitcoin was sound money,
Speaker 2: but everything else was a scam, and there was not
Speaker 2: going to be allowed any nuance. So it's either in
Speaker 2: or out, and you have these people who are going
Speaker 2: to be the gatekeepers. They are the close friends of
Speaker 2: Jeffrey Epstein because he pardoned parties with them. Todd, that's
Speaker 2: the way these things work. Todd Blanche says that it's
Speaker 2: not a crime to party with Jeffrey Epstein, But do
Speaker 2: you party with Jeffrey Epstein. He gives you a taste
Speaker 2: of that forbidden fruit, that dangerous drug. And he also
Speaker 2: throws in some blackmail there. And now we've got a
Speaker 2: way to control how people have access to this, to
Speaker 2: control the narrative, to say which things are legit and
Speaker 2: which things are not legit. Do you see how this works?
Speaker 2: Do you see how they can take over something that
Speaker 2: at its core people are focused on, well, can bitcoin
Speaker 2: be manipulated? And who wrote the code? It's not about
Speaker 2: who wrote the code, It's about the money and the
Speaker 2: system that is there. So he says he also had
Speaker 2: funding starvation projects are identified as threats. They got frozen
Speaker 2: out of the exact same venture capital networks that were
Speaker 2: pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into bitcoin infrastructure. This
Speaker 2: wasn't grassroots bitcoin maximalism. This was a deliberate competitive suppression
Speaker 2: and it worked. And so when things got difficult for
Speaker 2: bitcoin in early twenty fifteen, it had its most vulnerable moment,
Speaker 2: and Jeffrey Epstein was involved in salvaging it as well.
Speaker 2: That ought to make you suspicious of this whole thing. Well,
Speaker 2: we don't have time for more of this, but it
Speaker 2: truly is amazing. And when you combine all of this
Speaker 2: with the traps that have been set in for the
Speaker 2: Great Taking. That is what we're going to talk about tomorrow,
Speaker 2: the Great Taking. Have a good day. Thank you for
Speaker 2: joining us. Happy your birthday, Karen, and.
Speaker 3: If you have any questions for the ask me anything,
Speaker 3: send them in with AMA and the description for the email.
Speaker 2: To our email David Night's Show at protimemail dot com
Speaker 2: or put them on Rumble AMA at the very beginning,
Speaker 2: thank you for joining us the common Man. They created
Speaker 2: common Core and dumbed down our children. They created Common
Speaker 2: Past to track and control us. They're Commons project to
Speaker 2: make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
Speaker 2: They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary. But
Speaker 2: each of us has worth and dignity created in the
Speaker 2: image of God. That is what we have in common.
Speaker 2: That is what they want to take away. Their most
Speaker 2: powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation. They desire to know
Speaker 2: everything about us, while they hide everything from us. It's
Speaker 2: time to turn that around and expose is what they
Speaker 2: want to hide. Please share the information and links you'll
Speaker 2: find at the Davidnightshow dot com. Thank you for listening,
Speaker 2: Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially,
Speaker 2: please keep us in your prayers, Ddavidnightshow dot com