WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:02.160
<v Speaker 1>While the world takes a little bit of a rest

2
00:00:02.200 --> 00:00:04.839
<v Speaker 1>over the Christmas New Year period. We thought we would too,

3
00:00:05.440 --> 00:00:07.879
<v Speaker 1>but we're not going to leave you hanging. We've dug

4
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:10.599
<v Speaker 1>into the archives and found a few of the biggest

5
00:00:10.679 --> 00:00:14.599
<v Speaker 1>episodes of recent times, so sit back and enjoy those,

6
00:00:14.720 --> 00:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and we'll be back with new episodes of Space Nuts,

7
00:00:18.519 --> 00:00:19.879
<v Speaker 1>probably in the middle of January.

8
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:21.839
<v Speaker 2>See then, Space Nuts.

9
00:00:22.079 --> 00:00:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Hello and thank you for joining us on Space Nuts,

10
00:00:24.800 --> 00:00:28.480
<v Speaker 3>where we talk astronomy and space science. Great to have

11
00:00:28.559 --> 00:00:32.560
<v Speaker 3>your company once again, and coming up on this particular episode,

12
00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:36.359
<v Speaker 3>we're going to talk about an exoplanet that has unusual rain.

13
00:00:37.159 --> 00:00:41.719
<v Speaker 3>It's raining gemstones and ruby slippers. Well maybe not the

14
00:00:41.799 --> 00:00:45.759
<v Speaker 3>ruby slippers, but definitely gemstones, which is very unusual. We'll

15
00:00:45.759 --> 00:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>also be answering some audience questions. Bob wants to talk

16
00:00:48.960 --> 00:00:52.479
<v Speaker 3>about research papers and how accurate or otherwise they might be.

17
00:00:53.359 --> 00:00:58.280
<v Speaker 3>It's all to come on this edition of Space Nuts

18
00:00:59.600 --> 00:01:06.079
<v Speaker 3>Channel ten nine Ignition Space Nuts or.

19
00:01:06.560 --> 00:01:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Three two.

20
00:01:10.159 --> 00:01:11.079
<v Speaker 4>Space Nuts.

21
00:01:11.400 --> 00:01:12.400
<v Speaker 5>That's when actually bought it.

22
00:01:12.480 --> 00:01:13.079
<v Speaker 2>Bells good.

23
00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:16.480
<v Speaker 5>My name is Andrew Dunkley. I am your host. Thank

24
00:01:16.519 --> 00:01:19.799
<v Speaker 5>you for joining us and with us again this week.

25
00:01:19.560 --> 00:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Because we can't get rid of him really it is

26
00:01:23.159 --> 00:01:25.519
<v Speaker 3>Professor Fred Watson, Astronomer at Large.

27
00:01:25.560 --> 00:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Hello Fred, Hello Andrew, how are you.

28
00:01:28.480 --> 00:01:30.719
<v Speaker 5>You are the space nuts barnacle you are?

29
00:01:30.879 --> 00:01:33.560
<v Speaker 2>That's yeah, I know, it's just just a barnacle on

30
00:01:33.599 --> 00:01:35.599
<v Speaker 2>the buck side of space nuts.

31
00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Right.

32
00:01:40.239 --> 00:01:41.959
<v Speaker 3>We have a lot to talk about today, so let's

33
00:01:41.959 --> 00:01:45.640
<v Speaker 3>get straight to our first topic, and this is a

34
00:01:45.799 --> 00:01:51.439
<v Speaker 3>really interesting one. We've talked about exoplanets and even planets

35
00:01:51.439 --> 00:01:54.079
<v Speaker 3>and moons in our own Solar system that have unusual

36
00:01:54.280 --> 00:01:56.879
<v Speaker 3>kinds of rain, like sulfur rain.

37
00:01:56.719 --> 00:01:57.480
<v Speaker 5>And acid rain.

38
00:01:57.560 --> 00:02:00.159
<v Speaker 3>And I think we talked about a planet one that

39
00:02:00.280 --> 00:02:04.920
<v Speaker 3>rained diamonds. Now there's an exoplanet that rains gemstones.

40
00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:06.840
<v Speaker 5>What's what's this all about?

41
00:02:08.280 --> 00:02:13.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, it's gemstones among other things. And it's you know,

42
00:02:14.000 --> 00:02:18.319
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot going on on this exo planet. It's

43
00:02:18.759 --> 00:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>what is it? Well, it is. I think it's a WASP. Yeah,

44
00:02:22.120 --> 00:02:26.199
<v Speaker 2>WASP one to one B. WASP is a is a

45
00:02:26.319 --> 00:02:30.919
<v Speaker 2>project that developed the detect XO planets by the transit method,

46
00:02:30.960 --> 00:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the fact that their brightness drops when they pass in

47
00:02:33.439 --> 00:02:37.199
<v Speaker 2>front of their parents. Star. WASP one two one is

48
00:02:37.400 --> 00:02:40.680
<v Speaker 2>actually a star which is about eight hundred and fifty

49
00:02:40.719 --> 00:02:45.599
<v Speaker 2>light years from here. It has a planet which is

50
00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:49.280
<v Speaker 2>very close to it. It's a hot jupiter. That's the

51
00:02:49.919 --> 00:02:52.960
<v Speaker 2>excuse me, the official description, because it's a big planet

52
00:02:53.879 --> 00:02:58.080
<v Speaker 2>and it orbits its parents star once every thirty hours,

53
00:02:58.319 --> 00:03:00.800
<v Speaker 2>so you know, its year is thirty hours long, Andrew,

54
00:03:00.840 --> 00:03:06.599
<v Speaker 2>it just doesn't it. But that's what's happening now. That means.

55
00:03:07.840 --> 00:03:12.240
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that means is that with a

56
00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:14.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, with a period that shorts and the distance

57
00:03:14.520 --> 00:03:16.879
<v Speaker 2>between the parents star and the planet that's that's small,

58
00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:21.080
<v Speaker 2>this planet will be tidally locked to its parents star.

59
00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>And that is the I guess the key to understanding

60
00:03:24.639 --> 00:03:29.000
<v Speaker 2>what's you know, what's going on here? It is it's

61
00:03:29.199 --> 00:03:34.759
<v Speaker 2>day side always is permanently facing the parents style. Well

62
00:03:34.759 --> 00:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>that that's a bit of a tortology, really, isn't it,

63
00:03:38.960 --> 00:03:41.639
<v Speaker 2>because the day side is always facing the parents star.

64
00:03:41.919 --> 00:03:45.000
<v Speaker 2>But the bottom line is, jeez, this is a good

65
00:03:45.039 --> 00:03:51.199
<v Speaker 2>start this morning. The bottom line, yes, so well done,

66
00:03:51.240 --> 00:03:57.439
<v Speaker 2>thank you. Yes, the planet is rotating at the same

67
00:03:57.520 --> 00:03:59.840
<v Speaker 2>rate at which it revolves around its start, like the

68
00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:02.400
<v Speaker 2>is rotating at the same rate as it revolves around

69
00:04:02.879 --> 00:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>the Earth. And so you've got this one side of

70
00:04:06.159 --> 00:04:09.960
<v Speaker 2>it that permanently faces the heat source and that means

71
00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>one side is hot and the other side is cold. Now,

72
00:04:14.599 --> 00:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>given that we can't see these planets directly, you may

73
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:21.959
<v Speaker 2>well ask and Drew, how can you study the day

74
00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and night sides of a world like this in detail?

75
00:04:25.560 --> 00:04:27.639
<v Speaker 5>That's a good question. Glad I thought of it.

76
00:04:28.879 --> 00:04:31.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you thought of it too. The answer is

77
00:04:32.120 --> 00:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>it's really clever stuff and needs you know, it needs

78
00:04:36.120 --> 00:04:42.079
<v Speaker 2>really quite significant astronomical infrastructure in order to make these observations.

79
00:04:42.079 --> 00:04:45.439
<v Speaker 2>I should I should mention that the authors of this

80
00:04:46.120 --> 00:04:51.879
<v Speaker 2>work come from MIT, Massaitutsetts Institute of Technology, John's Hopskins

81
00:04:52.600 --> 00:04:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Johns Hopkins University, Caltech, and other US universities.

82
00:04:57.480 --> 00:05:01.680
<v Speaker 3>It is a myth fall, but it is Massachusetts, Massachusetts,

83
00:05:01.720 --> 00:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>is what I tried to say.

84
00:05:02.800 --> 00:05:07.759
<v Speaker 2>That's right. I didn't really anyway, never mind, I didn't

85
00:05:07.759 --> 00:05:10.600
<v Speaker 2>do well with it. But so what how do you

86
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>How do you detect what's going on on the day

87
00:05:14.600 --> 00:05:16.399
<v Speaker 2>and night sides of a world like this? And what

88
00:05:16.439 --> 00:05:22.319
<v Speaker 2>you do is you observe the planet and all you

89
00:05:22.319 --> 00:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>can see is the star. That's the only thing that

90
00:05:24.439 --> 00:05:27.959
<v Speaker 2>is visible in your telescope. But you observe the star's

91
00:05:28.079 --> 00:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>light throughout the orbital period, of the planet. And given

92
00:05:32.959 --> 00:05:34.879
<v Speaker 2>that that's only thirty hours, you don't have to wait

93
00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:38.040
<v Speaker 2>it very long. If you're looking from outside the Solar

94
00:05:38.040 --> 00:05:40.079
<v Speaker 2>System and trying to do this with Jupiter, you'd be

95
00:05:40.120 --> 00:05:42.079
<v Speaker 2>waiting what is it twelve years or something like that.

96
00:05:42.199 --> 00:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>It's much longer. No, I think it's five years. Sorry,

97
00:05:46.839 --> 00:05:52.759
<v Speaker 2>I should do that calculation again. Anyway, thirty hours gives

98
00:05:52.800 --> 00:05:58.639
<v Speaker 2>you time to you know, to actually work out exactly

99
00:05:58.680 --> 00:06:02.279
<v Speaker 2>what's going on through the different phases of the planet,

100
00:06:02.399 --> 00:06:04.920
<v Speaker 2>because that's what it's all about. It's like the phases

101
00:06:04.959 --> 00:06:08.240
<v Speaker 2>of the moon. We watch the moon going round because

102
00:06:08.279 --> 00:06:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it's lit up by the Sun and we can see,

103
00:06:11.639 --> 00:06:14.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, progressing from new moon to first quarter to

104
00:06:14.639 --> 00:06:16.399
<v Speaker 2>full moon and all the rest of it. And you

105
00:06:16.439 --> 00:06:20.920
<v Speaker 2>can do the same thing with an exoplanet. But what

106
00:06:20.959 --> 00:06:23.240
<v Speaker 2>you do, what all you're able to measure is the

107
00:06:23.279 --> 00:06:27.399
<v Speaker 2>total light from the planet plus the star. But as

108
00:06:27.439 --> 00:06:32.240
<v Speaker 2>you'd imagine, that varies throughout the revolution period of the planet.

109
00:06:32.959 --> 00:06:37.399
<v Speaker 2>When you've got just when the planet is behind the star,

110
00:06:37.959 --> 00:06:40.839
<v Speaker 2>all you've got is the light of the star. And

111
00:06:41.040 --> 00:06:44.079
<v Speaker 2>I should add that you're not just observing how bright

112
00:06:44.120 --> 00:06:46.839
<v Speaker 2>it is, you're also observing the spectrum of this thing,

113
00:06:46.879 --> 00:06:50.240
<v Speaker 2>so you're looking in detail at the chemical constituents that

114
00:06:50.439 --> 00:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>is revealed by the light that is coming to you.

115
00:06:54.519 --> 00:06:57.000
<v Speaker 2>So when the planets behind the star, all her seeing

116
00:06:57.000 --> 00:07:00.319
<v Speaker 2>is the light of the star when the planet shifts

117
00:07:00.399 --> 00:07:03.240
<v Speaker 2>slightly in its path around the star, so you can

118
00:07:03.279 --> 00:07:06.800
<v Speaker 2>see both. What you've got is effectively you're looking at

119
00:07:06.839 --> 00:07:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the full planet like an equivalent of a full moon.

120
00:07:09.600 --> 00:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>It's almost completely illuminated, and that light adds to the

121
00:07:13.319 --> 00:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>light of the star. And so you can then look

122
00:07:17.759 --> 00:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>at how the spectrum has changed, and that is telling

123
00:07:21.160 --> 00:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>you about the atmosphere of the planet itself rather than

124
00:07:25.600 --> 00:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>you know the atmosphere of the star. In fact, what

125
00:07:28.079 --> 00:07:30.959
<v Speaker 2>you can do is subtract the star spectrum from the

126
00:07:31.000 --> 00:07:34.519
<v Speaker 2>spectrum of the combined planet plus star and you get

127
00:07:34.519 --> 00:07:38.399
<v Speaker 2>the planet spectrum. That's how this works, and then that

128
00:07:38.560 --> 00:07:45.279
<v Speaker 2>changes throughout the planet's year thirty thirty hours, and eventually

129
00:07:45.439 --> 00:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at the backside of the planet, and in

130
00:07:49.759 --> 00:07:53.839
<v Speaker 2>fact you have a point where that is superimposed on

131
00:07:53.879 --> 00:07:58.079
<v Speaker 2>the star. Once again, you can do some clever work

132
00:07:58.160 --> 00:08:02.079
<v Speaker 2>because you can look at you can look at the

133
00:08:02.120 --> 00:08:06.279
<v Speaker 2>combined spectrum of the backside of the planet superimposed on

134
00:08:06.319 --> 00:08:10.759
<v Speaker 2>the star itself. That combined spectrum. If you subtract out

135
00:08:10.800 --> 00:08:14.759
<v Speaker 2>the spectrum of the star itself, it shows you what

136
00:08:15.000 --> 00:08:18.079
<v Speaker 2>chemical constituents again are in the atmosphere of the planet,

137
00:08:18.120 --> 00:08:21.519
<v Speaker 2>because the light of the star is passing through the

138
00:08:21.560 --> 00:08:24.319
<v Speaker 2>atmosphere of the planet, round the edge of it and

139
00:08:24.360 --> 00:08:28.279
<v Speaker 2>coming back to Earth. So that's the technique. And what's

140
00:08:28.319 --> 00:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>been found is that this object is quite extraordinary. So

141
00:08:33.480 --> 00:08:38.600
<v Speaker 2>it's got a day side that is extremely hot, more

142
00:08:38.600 --> 00:08:43.639
<v Speaker 2>than three thousand degrees kelvin. So what that does is

143
00:08:45.279 --> 00:08:47.320
<v Speaker 2>it's known that there is water vapor in the atmosphere

144
00:08:47.360 --> 00:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of this planet. Well there's water vapor on the night side,

145
00:08:50.360 --> 00:08:54.320
<v Speaker 2>but on the day side, the water molecules are just

146
00:08:54.440 --> 00:08:58.720
<v Speaker 2>torn apart because of the high temperatures. So you've got

147
00:08:59.360 --> 00:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>hydrogen and oxygen atoms that are that are you know,

148
00:09:03.159 --> 00:09:08.399
<v Speaker 2>they're they're independent within the atmosphere. And then it turns

149
00:09:08.440 --> 00:09:11.919
<v Speaker 2>out that because of the heat, that generates high pressure

150
00:09:11.960 --> 00:09:15.799
<v Speaker 2>in the day side, which causes winds that blow things

151
00:09:15.840 --> 00:09:19.720
<v Speaker 2>around to the night side. On the night side, it's

152
00:09:19.840 --> 00:09:22.879
<v Speaker 2>cool enough, yeah, for these things to fall back to water,

153
00:09:24.200 --> 00:09:28.519
<v Speaker 2>and so you get water vapor fall forming in the

154
00:09:28.559 --> 00:09:31.360
<v Speaker 2>atmosphere of the of the dark side of the planet.

155
00:09:32.000 --> 00:09:36.559
<v Speaker 2>That the estimate that these these winds are five kilometers

156
00:09:36.600 --> 00:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>per second, so this is eleven thousand miles per hour.

157
00:09:40.799 --> 00:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a it's sixteen, sixteen or seventeen thousand kilometers

158
00:09:45.519 --> 00:09:46.159
<v Speaker 2>per hour.

159
00:09:46.519 --> 00:09:49.879
<v Speaker 3>Sounds like that's the same as it was in Sydney yesterday.

160
00:09:50.399 --> 00:09:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we didn't get the wind, but we got the rain.

161
00:09:52.879 --> 00:09:55.600
<v Speaker 2>So we got the we got the water vapor, huge,

162
00:09:55.759 --> 00:09:59.960
<v Speaker 2>huge quantities of rain. Oh gosh, bucket loads of it

163
00:10:01.039 --> 00:10:05.519
<v Speaker 2>h two suitably combined back into water vapor. Yes, so

164
00:10:05.559 --> 00:10:08.279
<v Speaker 2>that's what they get on the on the dark side

165
00:10:08.440 --> 00:10:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of the of this wasp on onto one being. But

166
00:10:12.919 --> 00:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>there's but way, there's more, because it's not just water

167
00:10:18.279 --> 00:10:23.159
<v Speaker 2>that's that's circulating like this. They find that on the

168
00:10:23.279 --> 00:10:28.559
<v Speaker 2>night side that the temperature is right to have quite

169
00:10:29.600 --> 00:10:32.639
<v Speaker 2>I guess the best word is exotic clouds or clouds

170
00:10:32.639 --> 00:10:36.759
<v Speaker 2>of exotic materials, and iron is one of them, and

171
00:10:36.840 --> 00:10:40.840
<v Speaker 2>a mineral, and a mineral that actually is a constituent

172
00:10:40.919 --> 00:10:43.519
<v Speaker 2>in gemstones. That's that's the point that you are making

173
00:10:43.559 --> 00:10:44.399
<v Speaker 2>right at the beginning.

174
00:10:44.639 --> 00:10:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well then that's that's the journalistic hook isn't it.

175
00:10:48.440 --> 00:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>It is absolutely so. Yes, to quote the Physics Dog

176
00:10:54.279 --> 00:10:57.919
<v Speaker 2>report on this, on the way around, exotic rain might

177
00:10:57.960 --> 00:11:01.679
<v Speaker 2>be produced, such as liquid gems from the Corundum clouds,

178
00:11:02.639 --> 00:11:05.279
<v Speaker 2>so you know, liquid rubies that would be quite nice.

179
00:11:05.320 --> 00:11:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Actually well yeah, anyway, really quite really quite remarkable stuff.

180
00:11:12.399 --> 00:11:16.399
<v Speaker 2>I should mention that these these observations were made with

181
00:11:17.320 --> 00:11:19.919
<v Speaker 2>the Hubble Space telescope. It was one of the spectroscopic

182
00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:23.279
<v Speaker 2>cameras on board the Hubble telescope that were that was used.

183
00:11:24.039 --> 00:11:28.399
<v Speaker 2>And fantastic work. Congratulations to the team and to the

184
00:11:28.639 --> 00:11:29.960
<v Speaker 2>jointist who writing about this.

185
00:11:30.279 --> 00:11:32.919
<v Speaker 3>I don't suppose they can tell us exactly what kind

186
00:11:32.960 --> 00:11:34.320
<v Speaker 3>of gem stones these.

187
00:11:34.159 --> 00:11:38.039
<v Speaker 5>Might be or Jim Jim Blobs sponents.

188
00:11:38.399 --> 00:11:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're suggesting that it could be maybe Look I

189
00:11:49.080 --> 00:11:53.120
<v Speaker 2>had rubies in my mind, and yeah, maybe rubies and sapphires.

190
00:11:53.159 --> 00:11:57.799
<v Speaker 2>That's that's that's the possibility. Corundum apparently is the minerals

191
00:11:57.840 --> 00:12:01.759
<v Speaker 2>that you know, goes towards these these gemstones.

192
00:12:02.000 --> 00:12:04.799
<v Speaker 3>So it wasn't far wrong with my ruby slippers analogy.

193
00:12:04.960 --> 00:12:06.679
<v Speaker 2>No, no, it's a very nice one though. I like

194
00:12:06.759 --> 00:12:07.399
<v Speaker 2>that very much.

195
00:12:07.480 --> 00:12:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, interesting, all right, that's a fascinating discovery. And if

196
00:12:12.360 --> 00:12:14.879
<v Speaker 3>you want to read more about it, you should go

197
00:12:14.919 --> 00:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>to the fizz dot org website. It's not FI double z,

198
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:22.360
<v Speaker 3>that's p h y s dot org website. It's a

199
00:12:22.399 --> 00:12:25.279
<v Speaker 3>fabulous website if you want to catch up on that

200
00:12:25.399 --> 00:12:30.559
<v Speaker 3>and many other stories. This is Space Nuts with Andrew

201
00:12:30.639 --> 00:12:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Dunkley and of course professor Fred Watson.

202
00:12:35.720 --> 00:12:39.559
<v Speaker 5>Three Space Nuts.

203
00:12:39.840 --> 00:12:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Now, if you would like to do us a favor,

204
00:12:43.559 --> 00:12:46.360
<v Speaker 3>that would be wonderful. You can send your checks to

205
00:12:46.799 --> 00:12:51.159
<v Speaker 3>Fred Watson at no of course, if you do want

206
00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>to become a patron, you can do that, and that

207
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:56.279
<v Speaker 3>is putting a little bit of money into the into

208
00:12:56.360 --> 00:13:00.279
<v Speaker 3>the kitty to keep the podcast rolling, which can do

209
00:13:00.399 --> 00:13:05.919
<v Speaker 3>via our website. Now that is totally optional and thank

210
00:13:05.960 --> 00:13:09.679
<v Speaker 3>you to those many many patrons that do so through

211
00:13:09.720 --> 00:13:13.639
<v Speaker 3>Patreon or supercast. So that's something that you can do.

212
00:13:13.759 --> 00:13:16.159
<v Speaker 3>Or you can make one off donations through the bias

213
00:13:16.200 --> 00:13:19.720
<v Speaker 3>a Cup of Coffee button on our website Spacenuts podcast

214
00:13:19.759 --> 00:13:25.559
<v Speaker 3>dot com. Or if you want to do something that's

215
00:13:25.600 --> 00:13:29.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be cost free and just cost you a

216
00:13:29.519 --> 00:13:33.879
<v Speaker 3>bit of time, write a review through whatever podcast platform

217
00:13:34.200 --> 00:13:35.440
<v Speaker 3>you happen to use.

218
00:13:35.559 --> 00:13:37.519
<v Speaker 5>So that's very helpful as well.

219
00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:40.919
<v Speaker 3>So those are some of the options to help support

220
00:13:40.960 --> 00:13:44.159
<v Speaker 3>the Space Nuts podcast, and we do appreciate anything anybody

221
00:13:44.200 --> 00:13:48.320
<v Speaker 3>does to keep us up and running. Okay, Fred, let's

222
00:13:48.360 --> 00:13:52.279
<v Speaker 3>get into our question segment. This is where people who

223
00:13:52.320 --> 00:13:54.200
<v Speaker 3>listen to space and That's send us all sorts of

224
00:13:54.720 --> 00:13:58.519
<v Speaker 3>hyperintelligent questions that I've got no clue about. But Fred

225
00:13:58.919 --> 00:14:04.279
<v Speaker 3>has an inkling and the first one comes from Bob.

226
00:14:04.519 --> 00:14:07.519
<v Speaker 4>This is Bob from Asheville, North Carolina in the US.

227
00:14:08.200 --> 00:14:11.519
<v Speaker 4>I have two questions. In two thousand and five, Professor

228
00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:15.559
<v Speaker 4>John Ionidis published a highly influential paper in Close Medicine

229
00:14:15.559 --> 00:14:20.519
<v Speaker 4>titled why most published research findings are False. He makes

230
00:14:20.519 --> 00:14:23.679
<v Speaker 4>the argument, and here I'm quoting that for most studied

231
00:14:23.720 --> 00:14:27.000
<v Speaker 4>designs and settings, it is more likely for our research

232
00:14:27.080 --> 00:14:30.639
<v Speaker 4>claim to be false than true. It's important to note

233
00:14:30.720 --> 00:14:33.720
<v Speaker 4>that he was focusing on medical studies, which have less

234
00:14:33.919 --> 00:14:37.600
<v Speaker 4>scientific rigor than physics. He does, however, conclude that, and

235
00:14:37.639 --> 00:14:42.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm quoting his paper again, that for many current scientific fields,

236
00:14:42.480 --> 00:14:46.639
<v Speaker 4>claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of

237
00:14:46.679 --> 00:14:50.960
<v Speaker 4>the prevailing bias. My first question for Professor Watson is

238
00:14:51.360 --> 00:14:54.240
<v Speaker 4>how often does this happen in your field? Meaning how

239
00:14:54.279 --> 00:14:58.159
<v Speaker 4>often our published research findings actually false because of bias

240
00:14:58.279 --> 00:15:03.879
<v Speaker 4>or statistical reasons. My second question is hypothetical medicine changes

241
00:15:03.919 --> 00:15:08.840
<v Speaker 4>relatively quickly. For example, peptic ulcers were treated with surgery

242
00:15:08.879 --> 00:15:12.480
<v Speaker 4>until nineteen eighty four, which is when Barry James Marshall,

243
00:15:12.600 --> 00:15:16.639
<v Speaker 4>an Australian physician at Royal Perth Hospital, reported that peptic

244
00:15:16.720 --> 00:15:19.679
<v Speaker 4>ulcers were caused by a type of bacteria called He'll

245
00:15:19.720 --> 00:15:23.639
<v Speaker 4>go back to pay Lauri. Today ulcers are treated with antibiotics.

246
00:15:24.279 --> 00:15:27.879
<v Speaker 4>Professor Watson, suppose you get fast forward one hundred or

247
00:15:27.919 --> 00:15:29.960
<v Speaker 4>five hundred years into the future and look back at

248
00:15:29.960 --> 00:15:31.639
<v Speaker 4>cosmology and astro and.

249
00:15:31.600 --> 00:15:34.519
<v Speaker 3>That's where Bob unfortunately got cut off. But we think

250
00:15:34.559 --> 00:15:38.159
<v Speaker 3>we've got the nuts and pults of his question, so

251
00:15:38.200 --> 00:15:40.320
<v Speaker 3>we're going to take a stab at it for you, Bob.

252
00:15:41.080 --> 00:15:42.960
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I guess the first part of his question

253
00:15:43.080 --> 00:15:50.279
<v Speaker 3>is about scientific papers, research papers, published works, and how

254
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:55.679
<v Speaker 3>maybe they could misinform or not be quite accurate. Is

255
00:15:55.720 --> 00:16:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that something that happens.

256
00:16:00.480 --> 00:16:07.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a really interesting question. There are I don't think

257
00:16:07.600 --> 00:16:15.879
<v Speaker 2>they're in astronomy. There is a strong incentive perhaps or

258
00:16:17.120 --> 00:16:22.600
<v Speaker 2>the reason why people should intentionally misinform. I think that

259
00:16:23.000 --> 00:16:29.639
<v Speaker 2>is almost always almost always zero. And what research that

260
00:16:29.759 --> 00:16:33.399
<v Speaker 2>does bark up the wrong tree. What research of that

261
00:16:33.559 --> 00:16:39.000
<v Speaker 2>kind that there is is honest mistakes, like the color

262
00:16:39.039 --> 00:16:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of the universe perhaps, well, that's right, that was an

263
00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:44.799
<v Speaker 2>honest mistake, Yeah, which was what was?

264
00:16:44.840 --> 00:16:47.879
<v Speaker 3>It was kind of I originally said it was aqua,

265
00:16:47.960 --> 00:16:49.519
<v Speaker 3>but it turned out to beige.

266
00:16:49.679 --> 00:16:52.720
<v Speaker 2>It was beige, that's right. And in fact, I remember

267
00:16:53.080 --> 00:16:56.159
<v Speaker 2>when I read that paper. This is probably ten to

268
00:16:56.200 --> 00:16:57.919
<v Speaker 2>fifteen years ago, and I know the guy who wrote

269
00:16:57.960 --> 00:17:00.799
<v Speaker 2>it quite well. I remember when I read that paper

270
00:17:00.840 --> 00:17:03.919
<v Speaker 2>thinking this cannot be the case. You can't have a

271
00:17:03.919 --> 00:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>an aqua universe because it's expanding and you know, you've

272
00:17:07.680 --> 00:17:11.319
<v Speaker 2>got basically a red shift there, and it turned out

273
00:17:11.319 --> 00:17:15.160
<v Speaker 2>to be beige, which is red shifted aqua. Anyway, Look,

274
00:17:15.680 --> 00:17:17.759
<v Speaker 2>the kind of thing that I was thinking of, Andrew,

275
00:17:17.799 --> 00:17:20.200
<v Speaker 2>and it might go to the heart of Bob's question,

276
00:17:20.880 --> 00:17:23.680
<v Speaker 2>is you remember last year there was a big fuss

277
00:17:23.720 --> 00:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>when people thought that possphine had been detected in the

278
00:17:27.200 --> 00:17:34.079
<v Speaker 2>upper atmosphere of Venus, and phosphene is on Earth is

279
00:17:34.519 --> 00:17:39.720
<v Speaker 2>generally produced by biological processes, and so that I know

280
00:17:39.880 --> 00:17:42.039
<v Speaker 2>that the researchers who did that work, and I know

281
00:17:42.240 --> 00:17:43.519
<v Speaker 2>some of them. In fact, I talked to one of

282
00:17:43.519 --> 00:17:48.240
<v Speaker 2>them afterwards. He's a friend of mine in Hawaii. They

283
00:17:48.279 --> 00:17:53.359
<v Speaker 2>were very very careful to tease out the signal of

284
00:17:53.599 --> 00:17:57.319
<v Speaker 2>phosphine from the noise. This was done with quite big

285
00:17:57.400 --> 00:18:00.160
<v Speaker 2>radio telescopes. In fact, Alma was one of them. Has

286
00:18:00.200 --> 00:18:06.440
<v Speaker 2>to come a large millimeter array. And it was with

287
00:18:06.519 --> 00:18:11.599
<v Speaker 2>reluctance that they mentioned the fact that posphine's a live product.

288
00:18:12.400 --> 00:18:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Because the popular press jumped all over, Yeah, that's right

289
00:18:15.440 --> 00:18:17.000
<v Speaker 3>on venus, there's life on venus.

290
00:18:17.160 --> 00:18:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly what happened. And you know, maybe the bias

291
00:18:22.079 --> 00:18:25.319
<v Speaker 2>that Bob mentions is there because it's something that we're all,

292
00:18:25.759 --> 00:18:27.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're all kind of trigger happy with. We

293
00:18:28.359 --> 00:18:33.200
<v Speaker 2>are urgently trying to seek any evidence of life anywhere

294
00:18:33.200 --> 00:18:34.200
<v Speaker 2>else in the universe.

295
00:18:35.319 --> 00:18:38.839
<v Speaker 3>Now, when you give some elements of the media an inch,

296
00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:39.680
<v Speaker 3>they take a mile.

297
00:18:40.359 --> 00:18:42.559
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's true, and that certainly happened in that case.

298
00:18:43.279 --> 00:18:47.039
<v Speaker 2>My recollection is that the original team still stand by

299
00:18:47.079 --> 00:18:50.960
<v Speaker 2>their discovery that it was posphine. But there was another

300
00:18:51.000 --> 00:18:54.039
<v Speaker 2>paper published. It must have been actually the year before

301
00:18:54.119 --> 00:18:56.359
<v Speaker 2>us when the posphine measurement was made, because I think

302
00:18:56.359 --> 00:18:59.240
<v Speaker 2>it was early last year that another paper was published

303
00:18:59.519 --> 00:19:04.680
<v Speaker 2>showing how how the phosphine signature could be mistaken that

304
00:19:04.759 --> 00:19:07.880
<v Speaker 2>it might actually think it was something like nitrous oxide.

305
00:19:07.880 --> 00:19:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember. It was something a lot less suggestive

306
00:19:11.720 --> 00:19:15.000
<v Speaker 2>of life processes. So I think honest mistakes are made.

307
00:19:15.039 --> 00:19:17.400
<v Speaker 2>But yes, there might be a bias there too.

308
00:19:18.160 --> 00:19:23.359
<v Speaker 3>Generally, you'll probably find bias in circumstances where somebody's trying

309
00:19:23.359 --> 00:19:30.400
<v Speaker 3>to sell something. You might get those studies that are

310
00:19:30.400 --> 00:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>released into certain products that improve your life, and the

311
00:19:34.920 --> 00:19:36.960
<v Speaker 3>study turned out to be ten people at a five

312
00:19:37.039 --> 00:19:40.039
<v Speaker 3>stars art for a weekend, answering a question.

313
00:19:39.880 --> 00:19:42.519
<v Speaker 5>And that kind of thing. So yeah, yeah, I think

314
00:19:42.559 --> 00:19:43.319
<v Speaker 5>that goes on.

315
00:19:43.680 --> 00:19:46.680
<v Speaker 2>There is certainly less so in astronomy. Astronomy, I think

316
00:19:46.759 --> 00:19:51.400
<v Speaker 2>is partly what one thing you're looking for, and you

317
00:19:51.480 --> 00:19:54.839
<v Speaker 2>always check this whenever you make a discovery, is how

318
00:19:54.880 --> 00:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>consistent it is with what we already know about the universe,

319
00:19:58.599 --> 00:20:02.359
<v Speaker 2>Because often our discovery is they're highly forensic. It's all

320
00:20:02.400 --> 00:20:07.640
<v Speaker 2>done at distances ranging up to the thirteen billion light years.

321
00:20:08.240 --> 00:20:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Just turning to and I'm hypothesizing here as to what

322
00:20:12.000 --> 00:20:14.279
<v Speaker 2>the second part of Bob's question was because he got

323
00:20:14.359 --> 00:20:17.119
<v Speaker 2>cut off, as he said, but I think he might

324
00:20:17.119 --> 00:20:19.799
<v Speaker 2>have been wanting to ask me, what if I fast

325
00:20:19.799 --> 00:20:23.720
<v Speaker 2>forward one hundred years into the future and then look

326
00:20:23.839 --> 00:20:26.559
<v Speaker 2>back at twenty twenty two, what I would think of

327
00:20:26.839 --> 00:20:30.559
<v Speaker 2>as being discoveries that maybe were misleading, And perhaps the

328
00:20:30.599 --> 00:20:33.400
<v Speaker 2>one that comes to mind, and it's not through any

329
00:20:33.519 --> 00:20:36.759
<v Speaker 2>lack of honesty. This is the best evidence we have

330
00:20:37.359 --> 00:20:41.519
<v Speaker 2>so far is that dark matter exists and that it

331
00:20:41.599 --> 00:20:46.039
<v Speaker 2>is a subatomic particle of some kind that is pointed

332
00:20:46.079 --> 00:20:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to on through so many different experiments, and there's a

333
00:20:49.680 --> 00:20:52.279
<v Speaker 2>self consistency about it as well with what else we

334
00:20:52.319 --> 00:20:56.680
<v Speaker 2>know about the universe. But it could well be that

335
00:20:56.759 --> 00:20:59.640
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that it wasn't that. You know that

336
00:20:59.759 --> 00:21:02.599
<v Speaker 2>in the end, there is something that we don't understand

337
00:21:02.759 --> 00:21:07.079
<v Speaker 2>about physics. And what I'm thinking of his mond modified

338
00:21:07.119 --> 00:21:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Newtunian dynamics. We've got a friend out there in the

339
00:21:10.759 --> 00:21:13.240
<v Speaker 2>audience a bit of a way and who's studying that

340
00:21:13.279 --> 00:21:16.079
<v Speaker 2>for his pH d and doing a great job. You know.

341
00:21:16.279 --> 00:21:20.119
<v Speaker 2>Just maybe the tide will turn and people will see

342
00:21:20.160 --> 00:21:23.599
<v Speaker 2>the evidence for modified Newtunian dynamics, which means that gravity

343
00:21:23.640 --> 00:21:25.559
<v Speaker 2>doesn't behave quite the way we thought it did on

344
00:21:25.640 --> 00:21:29.160
<v Speaker 2>large scales. That that might turn out to be the

345
00:21:29.200 --> 00:21:32.880
<v Speaker 2>answer that would be one I might venture to suggest

346
00:21:32.960 --> 00:21:35.319
<v Speaker 2>will be something that in one hundred years time we

347
00:21:35.400 --> 00:21:37.839
<v Speaker 2>might look back on and say, we all thought it

348
00:21:37.920 --> 00:21:41.759
<v Speaker 2>was dark matter. Yeah, how foolish were we?

349
00:21:43.599 --> 00:21:43.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

350
00:21:44.000 --> 00:21:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, and then that's not probably not an uncommon scenario.

351
00:21:47.759 --> 00:21:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean we hindsight is twenty twenty in hindsight, until

352
00:21:52.720 --> 00:21:54.920
<v Speaker 3>you go forward and look back and go, ah, okay.

353
00:21:55.200 --> 00:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, that was it, that was why.

354
00:21:57.240 --> 00:21:59.680
<v Speaker 5>Yes, of course we get it right.

355
00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:01.799
<v Speaker 2>A lot of tom too, I think we do. I

356
00:22:01.880 --> 00:22:03.359
<v Speaker 2>think that's really all right.

357
00:22:03.400 --> 00:22:08.799
<v Speaker 5>Bob Lovely, Hey from me, thanks for your questions or

358
00:22:11.559 --> 00:22:12.559
<v Speaker 5>space nuts.

359
00:22:13.079 --> 00:22:16.400
<v Speaker 6>Hello again, space nutters. This is Anna from Astronomy Daily,

360
00:22:16.559 --> 00:22:18.839
<v Speaker 6>the podcast, stopping by again with a couple of the

361
00:22:18.880 --> 00:22:22.519
<v Speaker 6>important stories we've been following over the past week. In

362
00:22:22.559 --> 00:22:26.000
<v Speaker 6>an intriguing start to twenty twenty five, residents of Mukukuo

363
00:22:26.079 --> 00:22:29.000
<v Speaker 6>Village and Kenya's Macqueney County were startled by a mysterious

364
00:22:29.079 --> 00:22:32.920
<v Speaker 6>arrival from above. A massive metal object weighing over one

365
00:22:32.960 --> 00:22:36.640
<v Speaker 6>thousand pounds plummeted from space and landed in their community,

366
00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:39.279
<v Speaker 6>creating a sound that could be heard up to thirty

367
00:22:39.279 --> 00:22:44.160
<v Speaker 6>miles away. The Kenya Space Agency quickly responded to the incident,

368
00:22:44.400 --> 00:22:48.680
<v Speaker 6>arriving at the scene on Tuesday morning. Working alongside local authorities,

369
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:52.519
<v Speaker 6>they secured the area and retrieved what they later identified

370
00:22:52.599 --> 00:22:56.119
<v Speaker 6>as a separation ring from a rocket launch. This impressive

371
00:22:56.160 --> 00:23:01.160
<v Speaker 6>piece of space hardware measures approximately eight feet in diameter. Typically,

372
00:23:01.359 --> 00:23:03.960
<v Speaker 6>these separation rings are designed to either burn up during

373
00:23:04.000 --> 00:23:07.720
<v Speaker 6>re entry into Earth's atmosphere or land safely in unpopulated

374
00:23:07.759 --> 00:23:12.759
<v Speaker 6>areas like oceans. This particular landing, while unexpected, fortunately caused

375
00:23:12.839 --> 00:23:16.640
<v Speaker 6>no injuries or significant damage. The Space Agency has assured

376
00:23:16.640 --> 00:23:18.720
<v Speaker 6>the public there is no cause for concern and is

377
00:23:18.759 --> 00:23:22.400
<v Speaker 6>treating this as an isolated incident. They're handling the situation

378
00:23:22.519 --> 00:23:25.720
<v Speaker 6>under international space law protocols, with the object now in

379
00:23:25.759 --> 00:23:29.480
<v Speaker 6>their custody for further investigation. It's a remarkable reminder of

380
00:23:29.480 --> 00:23:33.920
<v Speaker 6>how space exploration occasionally makes surprising appearances in our everyday lives.

381
00:23:34.839 --> 00:23:37.240
<v Speaker 6>Scientists have made an exciting breakthrough in our ability to

382
00:23:37.279 --> 00:23:40.720
<v Speaker 6>detect gravitational waves, those subtle ripples and space time that

383
00:23:40.720 --> 00:23:45.119
<v Speaker 6>give us unique insights into cosmic events. Researchers have developed

384
00:23:45.119 --> 00:23:48.759
<v Speaker 6>a new technique called optical spring tracking that could dramatically

385
00:23:48.759 --> 00:23:52.839
<v Speaker 6>improve how clearly we can detect these elusive waves. The

386
00:23:52.880 --> 00:23:58.160
<v Speaker 6>Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory or ALIGO uses incredibly

387
00:23:58.200 --> 00:24:01.759
<v Speaker 6>sensitive equipment to measure tiny distortions in space time caused

388
00:24:01.799 --> 00:24:06.400
<v Speaker 6>by distant cosmic events. While this technology has already revolutionized

389
00:24:06.400 --> 00:24:09.759
<v Speaker 6>our understanding of phenomena like black hole mergers, it faces

390
00:24:09.799 --> 00:24:13.920
<v Speaker 6>limitations from what scientists call quantum noise. This new optical

391
00:24:13.960 --> 00:24:16.640
<v Speaker 6>spring tracking system works by tuning itself to match the

392
00:24:16.680 --> 00:24:21.200
<v Speaker 6>frequency of incoming gravitational waves. In tests, researchers used a

393
00:24:21.240 --> 00:24:26.240
<v Speaker 6>microscopic mirror weighing just fifty nanograms made from carefully layered aluminum,

394
00:24:26.279 --> 00:24:30.160
<v Speaker 6>gallium arsenide, and gallium arsenide. When hit with laser light,

395
00:24:30.359 --> 00:24:33.119
<v Speaker 6>this tiny mirror creates an optical spring effect that can

396
00:24:33.160 --> 00:24:36.799
<v Speaker 6>be precisely controlled to track and enhance gravitational wave signals.

397
00:24:37.599 --> 00:24:41.279
<v Speaker 6>The results have been remarkable. In their proof of concept experiment,

398
00:24:41.640 --> 00:24:44.599
<v Speaker 6>the team demonstrated that tracking a signal with this system

399
00:24:45.039 --> 00:24:48.519
<v Speaker 6>improved the signal to noise ratio by up to forty

400
00:24:48.519 --> 00:24:52.160
<v Speaker 6>times compared to traditional methods. This means we could potentially

401
00:24:52.240 --> 00:24:56.359
<v Speaker 6>detect much fainter gravitational waves from even more distant cosmic events.

402
00:24:57.160 --> 00:25:00.640
<v Speaker 6>While implementing this technology in full scale observatory like LIGO

403
00:25:01.000 --> 00:25:06.200
<v Speaker 6>will require overcoming some engineering challenges. The potential benefits are enormous.

404
00:25:07.240 --> 00:25:11.440
<v Speaker 6>By enhancing our ability to detect gravitational waves, we might

405
00:25:11.519 --> 00:25:14.559
<v Speaker 6>soon be able to observe events from the very earliest

406
00:25:14.599 --> 00:25:18.759
<v Speaker 6>moments of our universe, including the mergers of primordial black

407
00:25:18.799 --> 00:25:23.119
<v Speaker 6>holes formed shortly after the Big Bang. This advancement represents

408
00:25:23.119 --> 00:25:25.400
<v Speaker 6>a significant step forward in our quest to understand the

409
00:25:25.480 --> 00:25:29.119
<v Speaker 6>universe's most energetic events, and could help unlock mysteries about

410
00:25:29.119 --> 00:25:32.119
<v Speaker 6>how our cosmos formed and evolved over billions of years.

411
00:25:33.400 --> 00:25:35.720
<v Speaker 6>And that's it from me for this episode of Space Nuts.

412
00:25:36.200 --> 00:25:39.519
<v Speaker 6>I'm anna don't forget to visit Astronomy Daily dot io

413
00:25:39.680 --> 00:25:42.400
<v Speaker 6>for your daily fix of space and astronomy news updates.

414
00:25:42.880 --> 00:25:46.680
<v Speaker 6>We're constantly updating the site with the latest discoveries, mission updates,

415
00:25:46.680 --> 00:25:50.319
<v Speaker 6>and cosmic wonders until our next adventure through the cosmos.

416
00:25:50.759 --> 00:25:53.200
<v Speaker 6>Keep looking up and stay curious about the mysteries that

417
00:25:53.240 --> 00:25:54.240
<v Speaker 6>surround us in space.

418
00:25:54.720 --> 00:26:03.960
<v Speaker 7>Face nuts to this Spice Nuts podcast available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio,

419
00:26:04.319 --> 00:26:06.039
<v Speaker 7>or your favorite podcast player.

420
00:26:06.200 --> 00:26:09.319
<v Speaker 5>You can also stream on demand at bites dot com.

421
00:26:09.559 --> 00:26:15.240
<v Speaker 3>This has been another quality podcast production from knights dot Com,
