Speaker 1: Turn smatch we have today you bet builders hanging by
Speaker 1: a thread here. Relax, relax, they still need one more goal.
Speaker 1: Well if it loses, nov bets got your Cover. Nov
Speaker 1: bet is the home of the bet builder this World Cup.
Speaker 1: From goal scorers to cards, get the best value on
Speaker 1: every match, plus get money back as a free bash.
Speaker 1: If your bet builder loses on the biggest game every
Speaker 1: single day, join today and get seventy.
Speaker 2: Euros in pre bets. No be bett or power to
Speaker 2: You Teason Seas apply eighteen plus bet Responsibly, Gambling Care
Speaker 2: dot I em today.
Speaker 1: You bet builders hanging by a thread here. Relax, relax,
Speaker 1: they still need one more goal. Well if it loses,
Speaker 1: nov bets got your cover. Nov bet is the home
Speaker 1: of the bet builder.
Speaker 2: This World Cup, from goal scorers to cards, get the
Speaker 2: best value on every match, plus get money back as
Speaker 2: a free bash.
Speaker 3: If your bet builder loses on.
Speaker 2: The biggest game every single day, join today and get seventy.
Speaker 3: Euros in pre bets.
Speaker 2: No be beat or power to you Season Seas apply
Speaker 2: eighteen plus bet responsibly Gambling Care Do.
Speaker 4: I The Rush Hour with James Golden, entertaining and informative
Speaker 4: on the Red Apple Podcast Network Hi.
Speaker 5: Back to Shannon, Who's got more yet again? Shannon, all right,
Speaker 5: this comes from Justice Alito, who brought this up during
Speaker 5: the arguments. This is his separate dissent. He says, the
Speaker 5: court's interpretation also has national security implications. Suppose that a
Speaker 5: person's only connection to this country is that he was
Speaker 5: born here to a mother who was present just long
Speaker 5: enough to give birth and then quickly return to her
Speaker 5: native country. Suppose that country is a strategic adversary or
Speaker 5: enemy of the United States. Suppose the child never visited
Speaker 5: the United States while growing up and was inculcated with
Speaker 5: hatred of this country. According to this court, now that
Speaker 5: person is a citizen of the United States. He can
Speaker 5: enter and leave the country as he pleases. He can
Speaker 5: travel the world on a United States passport. Even if
Speaker 5: he plots to harm this country, he cannot be deprived
Speaker 5: of his status as a citizen, at least under current precedent.
Speaker 5: He goes on to say that this decision today also
Speaker 5: provides a powerful incentive to enter or remain in this
Speaker 5: country illegally. He goes on to say, in my judgment,
Speaker 5: the Court has made a mistake that will seriously affect
Speaker 5: the country's future. So some very pointed descents here from
Speaker 5: those who raise these very big concerns during the arguments
Speaker 5: and their real world scenarios, which are not a fantasy,
Speaker 5: They're not a movie. I mean these things that can
Speaker 5: actually happen now under this ruling that you have today
Speaker 5: from the majority.
Speaker 3: And Dave, my friends, Welcome to the Tuesday edition of
Speaker 3: bosl Lee's Rush, Our Fastest Our in American Media. Ya
Speaker 3: all right, the big decision dropped today. The Supreme Court
Speaker 3: ruled birth right citizenship. The interpretation of it anyway stays
Speaker 3: as it is. The fight is not over, and I
Speaker 3: would just say there are people with that are very
Speaker 3: disappointed by it. If you're disappointed, that means you expected
Speaker 3: the Court to rule other than they did. If you
Speaker 3: remember when the oral arguments were held, many of us
Speaker 3: that commented on afterwards of that the Court's not gonna
Speaker 3: you could just tell the Court's not gonna give this one.
Speaker 3: Court's are not going to rule any different than they
Speaker 3: have turned out to have ruled. It was that obvious
Speaker 3: during the orals. So I'm not disappointed in the ruling.
Speaker 3: I didn't expect it to go any other way than
Speaker 3: it did. In fact, President Trump. I thought his take
Speaker 3: was just really interesting on all of this. By the way,
Speaker 3: Princess Diana will be with us tomorrow. Can't wait to
Speaker 3: discuss this with her. With the other big court rulings
Speaker 3: of this term, the President has said the Supreme Court
Speaker 3: has treated Republicans fairly in caps and that we will
Speaker 3: right the wrong of the birthright citizenship through Congress. So
Speaker 3: that's very positive statement. In fact, that's what Justice Kavanaugh
Speaker 3: suggested as the way to deal with this is that Congress,
Speaker 3: and from my interpretation of what I'm reading, it may
Speaker 3: not take a constitutional amendment. The Congress could ratify the
Speaker 3: intent of what birthright citizenship means without going through a
Speaker 3: constitutional amendment, and that is one way to go about it.
Speaker 3: But President Trump said, getting back to his statement, the
Speaker 3: biggest and most consequential decision issued by the Court by
Speaker 3: far is the Slaughter case, which overturned the very famous
Speaker 3: Humphreys executour rule. This whole concept of power has been
Speaker 3: fought for nearly one hundred years, going all the way
Speaker 3: back to Franklin del and Roosevelt, where a large slice
Speaker 3: of his power was taken away. He fought to regain it.
Speaker 3: He even wanted to pack the court, but was unsuccessful
Speaker 3: in doing so. This decision gives tremendous additional power back
Speaker 3: to the presidency where it belongs. It is an honor
Speaker 3: to be the sitting president who, after all these years,
Speaker 3: won this very important and hard case, hard fought case.
Speaker 3: Trump goes on and say, we've got a look at
Speaker 3: victories too. We had the birthright editionship loss, which will
Speaker 3: work the correct in Congress. But the big slaughter was slaughter.
Speaker 3: The Republican Party was treated fairly by the United States
Speaker 3: Supreme Court. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Now,
Speaker 3: if you and I spoke about this yesterday, I am
Speaker 3: so happy, and I mentioned FDR in my discussions yesterday
Speaker 3: with it, because this goes back, Yes, it goes back
Speaker 3: to the creation of to me, socialist America, of which
Speaker 3: Franklin Delano Roosevelt is the grandfather of socialism in America.
Speaker 3: But this rule that the agencies would be under the
Speaker 3: administrative branch but really under the deep state, and the
Speaker 3: president would have very little to do with how these
Speaker 3: agencies run goes back to fbr's time. And if you
Speaker 3: want to hear how very liberals, how very upset liberals
Speaker 3: are about it. Look no further than the publication the
Speaker 3: Nation kind of a comi rag. Their headline reads, thus
Speaker 3: lay the Supreme Court just gave Trump a terrifying new power.
Speaker 3: On Monday, the Supreme Court vastly expanded the president's power
Speaker 3: by ending the independence of the country's independent executive agencies.
Speaker 3: That holds opening sentence makes zero sense. Executive agencies are
Speaker 3: in the executive You can't have independent agencies in the
Speaker 3: as if the executive agencies don't fall within the executive branch.
Speaker 3: The president runs the execut the branch except for these
Speaker 3: independent agencies, which are in his branch or her if
Speaker 3: we have a female president, and the Nation goes on
Speaker 3: to say it did this in a ruling that gives
Speaker 3: the president to fire the people who run these agencies
Speaker 3: at will rather than for a cause. This change doesn't
Speaker 3: just mean that Donald Trump and Elon Musk, for they
Speaker 3: hate Musk, can chainsaw their way through the federal government.
Speaker 3: It means that Trump or whoever is president after him,
Speaker 3: can undermine the entire regulatory structure that constrains the smash
Speaker 3: and grab capitalism favored by the Epstein class. Boy, Hey,
Speaker 3: they are just going all out here and people upset.
Speaker 3: It means that institutions that regulate banks, businesses, public health,
Speaker 3: and the environment are nothing more than the puppets of
Speaker 3: the administration in charge. It means that the administration under
Speaker 3: the president actually gets to implement what the president that
Speaker 3: was elected sees as the mandate for his or her election.
Speaker 3: That's what it means. Up until now, you could be
Speaker 3: president and you had this bureaucratic state it's called the
Speaker 3: administrative state, or it's called the deep state, take your pick,
Speaker 3: and they have all these political appointees that Democrats and
Speaker 3: their allies for the most part, have lobbed, have lobbed
Speaker 3: into these positions, some buried them in this for decades,
Speaker 3: and their job was to if a Republican is elected,
Speaker 3: sabotage Yeah, he's supposed to be in charge of the agencies,
Speaker 3: but you sabotage that president make sure that we don't
Speaker 3: get Republicans who actually have power. And that has been
Speaker 3: overturned out and liberals understand the full meaning of it.
Speaker 3: I said yesterday, this is one of the biggest rulinings
Speaker 3: in our history. It is this is one of the
Speaker 3: biggest ruinings that has come down in the court for
Speaker 3: the last hundred years. Now getting back to this birthright
Speaker 3: business very quickly. Kavanaugh, in his concurrence appears to have
Speaker 3: given Republicans a path forward. That's what a Fox News
Speaker 3: report said. He did not argue that President Trump's executive
Speaker 3: order ending birthright citizenship violated the fourteenth Amendment. Instead, he
Speaker 3: argued that such a change would require an Act of Congress.
Speaker 3: So what Kavanaugh is saying, and pretty much of his say,
Speaker 3: Hey Congress, you guys want to change this. You know
Speaker 3: you can change this. He wrote, the court today holds
Speaker 3: that the order violates the fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
Speaker 3: Speaking of Trump's executive order, I respectfully disagree with the
Speaker 3: Court's constitutional holding. In my view, the executive order does
Speaker 3: not violate the fourteenth Amendment, but the order does does
Speaker 3: contravene a federal statute eight USC. Fourteen oh one. Congress could,
Speaker 3: consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, amend fourteen oh one, or
Speaker 3: otherwise enact new legislation establishing exemptions to birthright citizenship four
Speaker 3: children born too foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country,
Speaker 3: but Congress has not yet done so. So throwing the
Speaker 3: ball right back at Congress, dear Congress, you guys can
Speaker 3: amend this without going through a constitutional amendment and pretty
Speaker 3: much get what you want in birthright in the birthing
Speaker 3: tourism industry. You can do that. You can make it
Speaker 3: clear that if you're here illegally and have a kiddo,
Speaker 3: the kiddos are not necessarily American citizens. You could do that.
Speaker 3: So this is not a total, total, total loss. You see,
Speaker 3: my friends, there are past being pointed to the forward
Speaker 3: way out of this. We speaking of forward ways. We'll
Speaker 3: take a quick break and come back with you because
Speaker 3: there's so much more. James Goldman is thoroughly with you.
Speaker 3: Fastest hour in American media continues. Keep it right here,
Speaker 3: The Rush Hour.
Speaker 4: With James Golden entertaining and informative on the Red Apple
Speaker 4: Podcast Network. The Rush Hour with James Golden entertaining and informative.
Speaker 6: On the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 3: Well, James Golan snurdly here, here's we're gonna There were
Speaker 3: some other Supreme Court rules that we will get to
Speaker 3: that went on transgender athletes, which, okay, if your state
Speaker 3: bans it, cool, if your state doesn't ban it. It
Speaker 3: didn't tell the states that they had to. There was
Speaker 3: a big ruling concerning campaign foiniance and was called coordination.
Speaker 3: So we will get to that too, Carlos. The moment
Speaker 3: that Mike Johnson, we don't have to play at all
Speaker 3: discover what was going on cut one, he was told
Speaker 3: during his presser. That's when the Supreme Court listened to
Speaker 3: the way that it took him. Oh dear, what did
Speaker 3: they rule? Jis businesship Cla mh.
Speaker 7: Well, uh, I need to read the opinion, okay, but
Speaker 7: obviously that's I mean, you could say that's a textualist,
Speaker 7: originalist view. However, I do think that this has been
Speaker 7: grossly abused in recent years, okay, And that is the
Speaker 7: case that was being made by the plaintiffs in the case,
Speaker 7: and we're very sympathetic to that because it is a
Speaker 7: serious problem we have. We have you know, uh, it's
Speaker 7: become a tourism, birthing tourism they call it, you know,
Speaker 7: a trend where people will just come and you just
Speaker 7: come onto the soil and have your child and then
Speaker 7: they're they're able to avail themselves of the welfare state
Speaker 7: and everything else intended to serve a noble, important purpose
Speaker 7: and has been thwarted and an overused and abused, and
Speaker 7: so I'm sure that we'll continue to Look at you.
Speaker 3: I'm with the going to be Republicans now. You know,
Speaker 3: we're trying to we're trying to We're trying to. What
Speaker 3: we're trying to do right now is just pass stuff,
Speaker 3: and these Republicans just will let me pass stuff. They
Speaker 3: keep talking about the damn Save that we're trying to
Speaker 3: put the Save Act in with the defense stuff, but
Speaker 3: they don't want to hear it. They're having a rebellion
Speaker 3: and the Senate why they're not helping. So, I mean,
Speaker 3: what are we supposed to do it? We supposed to Congress?
Speaker 3: They say, Uh, the Kavanaugh says something about led Congress
Speaker 3: do it, but Congress. Congress is useless almost but but anyway,
Speaker 3: Uh yeah, so it's up to Congress. And will they
Speaker 3: stop it? Uh? I don't know. We're fighting a rebellion
Speaker 3: with all of these We got this lunar girl, Luna, Luna,
Speaker 3: we got all these others that are stopping me from
Speaker 3: doing what I'm trying to do now. Huh poor Mike. Yeah,
Speaker 3: that's right, ladies and gentlemen, Republicans in the House having
Speaker 3: a rebellion. Uh, they're sick of the Senate, so they're
Speaker 3: holding up action in the house. Doesn't have to make sense,
Speaker 3: Princess Dan will explain it tomorrow. Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Speaker 3: Don't go away.
Speaker 4: The Rush Hour with James Golden Entertaining and informative on
Speaker 4: the Red Apple Podcast Network. The Rush Hour with James
Speaker 4: Golden Entertaining and informative on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 3: You know that Phyllis Hyman song that we played that
Speaker 3: was written by mit Toomey and M two May and Lucas.
Speaker 3: M two May who is he? The songwriting team M
Speaker 3: two May and Reggie Lucas. I both of them played
Speaker 3: with Miles Davis in his touring band. They left and
Speaker 3: did a production company. They have written so many hits.
Speaker 3: That song the closer I Get to You by ROBERTA
Speaker 3: and Donnie Hathaway. They wrote that never knew love like
Speaker 3: this before Stephanie Mills. That went number one. You Know
Speaker 3: How to Love Me? We just heard with Phyllis Hyman
Speaker 3: and Reggie Lucas is the guy behind Madonna's first album.
Speaker 3: So there you go. The laws of ladies and gentlemen. Now,
Speaker 3: the transgender thing. Not gonna spend a lot of time
Speaker 3: with it because pretty much what it says is the
Speaker 3: status quo was cool. There, the status quo is cool.
Speaker 3: There's states that said no, you can't do it. Supreme
Speaker 3: Court said, yeah, okay, y'all don't have to do it.
Speaker 3: I love the way that I interpret Supreme Court cases
Speaker 3: like like every man, they shook on it like yeah,
Speaker 3: looks like Supreme Court said, yah, I that's what this is.
Speaker 3: Supreme Court said, I, y'all don't want to have girls
Speaker 3: playing in girls sports. I I, y'all don't have to.
Speaker 3: And then they have some other states and said, but
Speaker 3: we want, but we want, but we want girls to
Speaker 3: play in boys sports. In the Supreme Court said nay die.
Speaker 3: At least that's the way I hear it. I we
Speaker 3: ain't gonna make you if y'all want to go out crazy.
Speaker 3: YI cool. And then Kavanaugh wrote, and he's getting you know,
Speaker 3: they liked what Kavanaugh said, So them Lisa Rubin cut
Speaker 3: for I think she was on PMS PMS now and
Speaker 3: so that woman is this is there.
Speaker 8: I want to read aloud from the ruling, and so
Speaker 8: ruly we emphasize one last point. Most of the biological
Speaker 8: female and transgender student athletes who are involved in transgender
Speaker 8: sports disputes around the country, are teenagers or in their
Speaker 8: early twenties. Those student athletes want to play sports, their
Speaker 8: desire to compete Warrant's respect. No student athlete on either
Speaker 8: side of the issue, whether a biological female or transgender,
Speaker 8: deserves to be awesome sized or villified. And I think
Speaker 8: that's a really interesting comment by the majority, because you
Speaker 8: have seen a number of athletes, women athletes in particular,
Speaker 8: who are born female and present as female, sort of
Speaker 8: villainize some of the people who are like the plaintiffs
Speaker 8: in this case. And Pellen was talking earlier about a
Speaker 8: demonstrator at the court and the heis I.
Speaker 3: Just understood what she was saying. You have some of
Speaker 3: the women in these cases who are born female and
Speaker 3: present female. Why not just say who are women? Who
Speaker 3: are girls? You have some of the platins in this
Speaker 3: case who are women. But no anyway, so she goes
Speaker 3: on to make that a big deal. You have women
Speaker 3: who are born females and present females. And then you
Speaker 3: have Laura Coach. She was giving analysis ONUS on CNN
Speaker 3: Cut six. Listen to this language.
Speaker 9: This monumental decision not unexpected, however, giving how the oral
Speaker 9: arguments went. Here was the crux of the issue. It
Speaker 9: was whether or not somebody who was assigned the male
Speaker 9: gender at birth would be allowed to play in a
Speaker 9: traditionally so called girls' sports in a public high school
Speaker 9: or of course, in the college setting. The argument that
Speaker 9: they were using to support a ban was that there
Speaker 9: was an unfair advantage provided to those assigned male at
Speaker 9: birth in women's competition. The other side said, no, no,
Speaker 9: this is sex based discrimination and it violates the protection
Speaker 9: clause of the fourteenth Amendment, and therefore you cannot do it.
Speaker 9: This has been, as panelis said, at the heart of
Speaker 9: many culture wars, and one about what the unfair advantage
Speaker 9: may be and whether or not gender identity should be
Speaker 9: included in a sex discrimination case. And otherwise, the courts
Speaker 9: seemed at the onset to be leaning towards this outcome anyway.
Speaker 9: But the fact that it is now happened now we
Speaker 9: have twenty seven or more states I believe, who had
Speaker 9: this ban different colleges. Nancyble A applies it differently to
Speaker 9: each and every type of sport, and so you had
Speaker 9: the potential for a patchwork system as opposed to a
Speaker 9: workable framework that would be consistent across the board.
Speaker 3: And again this language levels use. You have people who
Speaker 3: are assigned at birth. What the hell these I mean?
Speaker 3: These people distort the language so horribly. You have assigned
Speaker 3: people who have been assigned at birth a male. You
Speaker 3: have males, males that were born males and are going
Speaker 3: to stay males. And you have others who are born
Speaker 3: girls but decide they want to be males. It's just anyway.
Speaker 3: The court kind of said, I we out, yo, y'all
Speaker 3: deal with it. We out Okay, at least that's my
Speaker 3: interpretation of it. I could be wrong, Well can oh this?
Speaker 3: Then I got Peter. Liberals are not gonna like this
Speaker 3: court today to Supreme Court. The Supreme Court today that
Speaker 3: expanded gun rights will will consider whether bans on semi
Speaker 3: automatic rifles often called assault weapons, violate the Second Amendment.
Speaker 3: So what they are going to take up is whether
Speaker 3: these states can ban AR fifteens. That's the weapon that
Speaker 3: they hate most and AR fifteen and other semi automatics.
Speaker 3: Still states like Connecticut and Chicago, and in Chicago, cities
Speaker 3: like Chicago where they've banned AR fifteens. Yeah, that's coming
Speaker 3: up for grabs in the next It's gonna be interesting
Speaker 3: to see how that does. The campaign finance stuff gets
Speaker 3: into the weeds, but it's a big deal. Republicans had
Speaker 3: asked if they could lift the bands on coordination money,
Speaker 3: how a party can how much money political party, state
Speaker 3: party can coordinate with individual candidates. Supreme course said yes,
Speaker 3: you can go ahead and do it six to three.
Speaker 3: So now supposedly Republicans have the advantage with money because
Speaker 3: they'll be able to coordinate with their candidates a little
Speaker 3: bit better, more money coming in in the midterm elections.
Speaker 3: We'll see whether that plays out the way that it
Speaker 3: is being reported. And those are some of the biggies.
Speaker 3: You can't wait to hear what Princess d has to
Speaker 3: say about these things tomorrow, all of them, especially the
Speaker 3: birthright city. She already told us that she expected the
Speaker 3: birthright citizenship and to go down the way that it
Speaker 3: went down, But I'm interested to see what she thinks
Speaker 3: the aftermath would be. And this other one, this huge one,
Speaker 3: the slaughter case, that to me, there's one of the
Speaker 3: biggest decisions in the last one hundred years. As I've
Speaker 3: said before, Now there are other things out there, the DOJ,
Speaker 3: this probe into this guy Singham is huge, but I'm
Speaker 3: gonna put that story aside. This is one of the
Speaker 3: socialists that's been underwriting the left, and we shall see.
Speaker 3: There's this story day too about key allies in like
Speaker 3: Oman helping to see whether they can divert traffic out
Speaker 3: of the strait of horror moves to thereby lessen the
Speaker 3: Iranian's position as a power broker in that region. So
Speaker 3: we have those things going on. And my favorite little
Speaker 3: blue word, And if you thought New York socialists were bad,
Speaker 3: way do you meet the Colorados? Do socialists? When her
Speaker 3: name is my lot heiros, we have something from her.
Speaker 3: We have something from this gal. I think we had
Speaker 3: it yesterday. We have it yesterday, or we had it today.
Speaker 3: And let me look very quickly cut sixteen. Here she is.
Speaker 3: This one's running out in Colorado.
Speaker 10: Denver's not New York, but Denver actually rates socialism higher
Speaker 10: than we rate capitalism by four points. And you know,
Speaker 10: when I talk to voters about what we're doing and
Speaker 10: why I'm a democratic socialist, I remind them that we
Speaker 10: have socialism already, right. It's in the roads that we
Speaker 10: drive on, it's in the schools we send our kids to.
Speaker 10: It's in the fire stations we call upon. I'm just
Speaker 10: asking that we extend that security to our healthcare, to
Speaker 10: our housing, to our nutritional food, to our higher education,
Speaker 10: so that we're actually meeting the basic needs of everyday
Speaker 10: working families in this country, so that we're not just
Speaker 10: getting by and surviving, so that we're actually thriving and
Speaker 10: the wealthiest, most powerful country honors.
Speaker 6: We're not asking for much.
Speaker 3: So we already have socialist roads, we already have socialist
Speaker 3: fire departments. It's all socialism. We even have socialist public schools.
Speaker 3: Now a lot of people would agree with that already.
Speaker 3: So her argument, hey, we already have socialism, let's just
Speaker 3: make sure that it's extended in every single inch of it.
Speaker 3: She's running out for Congress out in Calorady. And then
Speaker 3: you have AOC which we did not get to yesterday.
Speaker 3: Want to get that. You know, all these young little socialists,
Speaker 3: especially they are young educated. How shall we say if
Speaker 3: we had to put a colored distinction on it, Young
Speaker 3: white liberals looking at the black guy that runs the
Speaker 3: Democrats in the house, and they're all these little white
Speaker 3: liberals are looking like a lynch mob at this thing.
Speaker 3: That's what they look like. They look like a white
Speaker 3: only lynch mob pointing at the TV screen when they
Speaker 3: saw how King Jeffrey's photo that you're next. The only
Speaker 3: thing they didn't do was use the N word afterwards,
Speaker 3: but you know they were in public, so I because
Speaker 3: you could tell the vibe was the vibe was the vibe?
Speaker 3: Was the vibe your next? Uh uh? Anyway, well that's
Speaker 3: what had happened. Oh if you don't believe me, go
Speaker 3: dig up the footage and look at them. They're like
Speaker 3: pointing at the TV screen when they saw the black
Speaker 3: guy's picture, the black Democrat, Hakim jeff black guy came.
Speaker 3: They were cool. They were cool. Man Dominie had you
Speaker 3: know the people and and and and you know the
Speaker 3: burkers and everything, and they're cool with that. They're like, okay,
Speaker 3: the people and the burkers, they're cool. And then ha
Speaker 3: King Jeffrey's picture comes on and they all start pointing
Speaker 3: to it and like the lynch mob, your next. But
Speaker 3: they couldn't get that last word out of their mouths
Speaker 3: your next, nick and they just kept saying it over
Speaker 3: and over again. The Hakim jeffries, you're next, You're next,
Speaker 3: So AOC was asked about that little lebonic language here
Speaker 3: and make sure we're inclusive, and uh, this cut seventeen
Speaker 3: is what AOC had to say about whether she is
Speaker 3: going to support Hakim Jeffries even though the other young
Speaker 3: socialists want to lynch him and this politically speaking, of course,
Speaker 3: lynch him, politically, lynch him. Uh, even though the other
Speaker 3: white young socialists, Yeah, yeah, they said, go ahead, player,
Speaker 3: this is shield.
Speaker 5: Though if Democrats went back to the house that Hockey Jeffers
Speaker 5: is the white right person to leave.
Speaker 11: You know, I'm the white conversations with Leader Jeffries and
Speaker 11: for me one and we have a broad caucus right
Speaker 11: for me, I have made very clear that one of
Speaker 11: my priorities in in determining and in a leader determination
Speaker 11: is securing public housing financing for New York City. And
Speaker 11: Leader Jeffries has made his prioritization for the residents of
Speaker 11: public housing very clear. And for that reason, I will
Speaker 11: be supporting the King Jeffries for leader.
Speaker 3: And did you understand what she said, Carlos, did you
Speaker 3: really when or did it just how the compunction works? Yeah?
Speaker 3: What did she say? Housing affording? Thing? Like? What the
Speaker 3: rent phrase here? That wasn't what she was talking about
Speaker 3: that was not why was she talking about? I don't know.
Speaker 3: I'm still stand by that woman that with a so
Speaker 3: called girls Sports. I kind of like, Okay, she's saying
Speaker 3: that King Jeffries for publicly liked something with public housing
Speaker 3: that she's doing, and so for that, it just sounds
Speaker 3: like a bunch of words. It's like, you should sign
Speaker 3: this for me so I can support you. I guess
Speaker 3: that's what the song is. I don't know. Almost like a
Speaker 3: quid pro crawl, doesn't It did sound like a quid
Speaker 3: pro crawl. Interesting? Interesting anyway, anyway, my friends, we have
Speaker 3: to take a quick break here. When we come back,
Speaker 3: we got the clip of the day, and we know
Speaker 3: how much you love the clip of the day. We
Speaker 3: do too.
Speaker 4: The Rush Hour with James Golden Entertaining and informative on
Speaker 4: the Red Apple Podcast Network. The Rush Hour with James
Speaker 4: Golden entertaining and informative on the Red Apple Podcast Network.
Speaker 3: Yes, Ladies and gentlemen claiming it is time, ladies and
Speaker 3: gentlemen fall day.
Speaker 4: Thank you you want to hear it is the clip
Speaker 4: of the day.
Speaker 3: And today's clip of the day comes from NBC News.
Speaker 3: My friends, it is very rare that you hear newscasters
Speaker 3: that sound like they almost want to give an apology
Speaker 3: for having to report the news today. Our clip of
Speaker 3: the day illustrates what it sounds like what a major
Speaker 3: news network has folks on the staff, the news journalists
Speaker 3: who almost feel like they must apologize for delivering the news.
Speaker 3: And this is what that sounds like.
Speaker 12: Just a quick note here, the terms that we're using
Speaker 12: here during our reporting biological male, biological female. The High
Speaker 12: Court put those terms in quotations in their decision and
Speaker 12: their dissent. But just so you know, we're using those
Speaker 12: terms from the decision itself, biological male, biological female.
Speaker 3: You hear that, ladies and gentlemen, Look, please don't get
Speaker 3: mad at us. The terms that we have to use
Speaker 3: today to describe what happened in the Supreme Court. These terms,
Speaker 3: these terms biological male, biological female. The Court put those
Speaker 3: in We hear it in BC. Why we wouldn't dare
Speaker 3: utter those words biological male and biological female because we
Speaker 3: know how harmful they are to a segment of our audience.
Speaker 3: We don't like these words. We don't like these words
Speaker 3: boriological male, bariological female. But we have to report them
Speaker 3: because the court sentence are just a note. Don't hold
Speaker 3: it against us. There, Supreme Court are the ones that
Speaker 3: use these highly offensive towns. How Dad him refer to
Speaker 3: biological males, biological females. But we have to we have
Speaker 3: to report it anyway. So that's our disclaimer from NBC
Speaker 3: A freaking courts.
Speaker 4: Uh.
Speaker 3: You recognize our theme of closing theme today is Stanley
Speaker 3: Clark's birthday. The closing theme that we use here is
Speaker 3: Quiet Afternoon by Stanley Clark. Stanley Clark is one of
Speaker 3: the greatest bassist in the world. He has worked with
Speaker 3: chick corea Return to Forever, Santana, Keith Richard's Quincy Jones,
Speaker 3: Paul McCartney, the Clark Duke Project that had they had
Speaker 3: a big pop hit Sweet Baby, George Duke and Stanley
Speaker 3: Clark together. Anyway, we have been using this because we
Speaker 3: love Stanley Clark. Here, we love, love, love Stanley Clark.
Speaker 3: So happy birthday to the one of the greatest basis
Speaker 3: of mankind upright by the way and Electric plays them all,
Speaker 3: Stanley Clark. May God blessed protect each and every single
Speaker 3: one of you, your families and your loved ones. Love
Speaker 3: and gratitude, my friends, for your being here with me
Speaker 3: and allowing me to be with you, God willing, We're
Speaker 3: back tomorrow with Princess Die here too. So until then,
Speaker 3: my friends, I bid you adieu bye.
Speaker 6: Thanks for listening to Boaster Lee's Rush Hour.
Speaker 13: You can hear Bose Nerdley's Rush Hour weekdays at four
Speaker 13: on seventy seven WABC.
Speaker 6: If you like the podcast, share it with your friends.
Speaker 13: And listen anytime at wabcradio dot com and download the
Speaker 13: WABC Radio app. Hit that subscribe button on all major
Speaker 13: podcast platforms.
Speaker 6: Plus, follow WABC.
Speaker 13: On social on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and X see you
Speaker 13: next time for a new episode, so you never have
Speaker 13: to wonder
Speaker 6: What the heck is going on here