Speaker 1: This is Dan Kaplis, and welcome to today's online podcast
Speaker 1: edition of The Dankplis Show. Please be sure to give
Speaker 1: us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Let me go
Speaker 1: on the record, right now, five oh six oh three, right,
Speaker 1: five oh six oh three, on Tuesday, September seventeen, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four. Nobody has said this, this entire nation, right,
Speaker 1: nobody has said this. But this is what I believe now,
Speaker 1: subject to revision down the road with new facts if
Speaker 1: they emerge. But as we sit here today, I don't
Speaker 1: think this election is going to be particularly close. I
Speaker 1: really don't. I think this thing is going to break big.
Speaker 1: I think it's gonna break big. I think it's highly
Speaker 1: likely to break big in Trump's favor. But one way
Speaker 1: or the other, I think it's going to break big.
Speaker 1: And we can break that down as we go through it.
Speaker 1: It's not the Hey, there's a big polling now today.
Speaker 1: It suggests that all the polling suggests that very very
Speaker 1: close race. The polling suggests Trump's on track to win, right,
Speaker 1: because it's either tied or very small Harris margins in
Speaker 1: the swing states, and historically, if you look back to
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, Biden had bigger leads almost everywhere. Then nothing
Speaker 1: Harris does now, or Trump's leading some places where Biden
Speaker 1: had a big leads. So yeah, everything right now seems
Speaker 1: to be tracking toward a Trump victory. But I just
Speaker 1: believe in the end it's going to break big and
Speaker 1: this margin's not going to be as close as everybody's
Speaker 1: expecting right now. And the reason I think it's likely
Speaker 1: to break in Trump's favor it boils down to this. First,
Speaker 1: what I said the second they deposed Biden and installed Harris.
Speaker 1: You've got to look at the strong currents, right, You've
Speaker 1: got to look at the big picture, and the strong
Speaker 1: current is America just isn't going to elect a Sam
Speaker 1: Francisco radical. That that is the strong current that that's
Speaker 1: going to be. I think very very hard, if not impossible,
Speaker 1: for the left overcome. Biden got elected by a handful
Speaker 1: of votes by pretending to be this blue collar moderate guy,
Speaker 1: right Biden Obama had to pretend to be a moderate
Speaker 1: to get elected. And Harris says, nowhere to hide. People
Speaker 1: are going to buy this new stuff she's a San
Speaker 1: Francisco radical, and maybe enough people hate Trump that they'll
Speaker 1: elect her, but I sure don't think so. I just
Speaker 1: think America is not going to elect to San Francisco radical.
Speaker 1: Then you get in all the other stuff in Trump's favor.
Speaker 1: Not everything's in his favor, right, but a whole lot
Speaker 1: of it is boiling down to and I'm just a
Speaker 1: big believer. I'm just a big believer in these basics. Now,
Speaker 1: you really care about this stuff, You're very knowledgeable. That's
Speaker 1: why you listen to shows like this, Right, vast majority
Speaker 1: of voters they're not tuned into shows like this regularly.
Speaker 1: They're not tuned into ABC, NBCCBS, LED LOW, MSNBC, Fox, etc.
Speaker 1: The vast majority of voters are out there going about
Speaker 1: their lives. They're living their lives. They promptably aren't interested
Speaker 1: in this stuff because of the negativity, or they flat
Speaker 1: out hate it, but they'll do their civic duty and vote.
Speaker 1: So it's going to be the big things that get
Speaker 1: through to them. And it doesn't mean they're low information,
Speaker 1: doesn't mean they're dumb or don't care any of that nonsense.
Speaker 1: They've just made other choices. So it's the big things
Speaker 1: that are going to get through to them, such as
Speaker 1: Harris being a San Francisco radical.
Speaker 2: But what's going to.
Speaker 1: Get through to them is they know that the country
Speaker 1: was better off, and chances are great they were better
Speaker 1: off under Trump than they are Biden. And they know
Speaker 1: that that Trump equals strength and Biden and Harris not
Speaker 1: so much.
Speaker 2: So it's those.
Speaker 1: Big things, all of which break in Trump's favor in
Speaker 1: my humble opinion, Okay, we got a lot of work
Speaker 1: to do, got a lot of hot sound from today.
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris in a real jam right because President Trump
Speaker 1: made a very smart move did not agree to a
Speaker 1: second three on one debate, And so what happens then?
Speaker 1: Harris is stuck now because she didn't answer the big
Speaker 1: questions at the debate. That's clear from the polling, and
Speaker 1: we said it on this show. Before the polling, she
Speaker 1: had to answer how she different than Biden. Didn't even
Speaker 1: try to go there and then explain her big changes
Speaker 1: in positions. Didn't even try to go there. That's how
Speaker 1: she came out looking good, looking good. I underwhy underlying
Speaker 1: the word looking good compared to the expectations, but not
Speaker 1: doing good because she didn't do what she had to do.
Speaker 1: She didn't answer these big questions. So now because Trump's
Speaker 1: smart and he's not agreeing to a second one, she's
Speaker 1: stuck going off and doing interviews, which obviously is petrified of,
Speaker 1: and which comes back to one of those big, big dynamics. Right,
Speaker 1: you really think the American people are going to elect
Speaker 1: as commander in chief in dangerous times, in a dangerous world,
Speaker 1: somebody who's afraid to do interviews. Ponder that for a second,
Speaker 1: mister funk, really come on. But anyway, now she's stuck
Speaker 1: doing interviews and it's going about the way you'd expect.
Speaker 1: Here here is a live interview she did today.
Speaker 3: It's a cry and shame. I mean, my heart breaks
Speaker 3: for this community. You know there were children, elementary school children.
Speaker 4: Who it was.
Speaker 3: School photo day. You remember what that's like.
Speaker 1: It was even worse on the video, which brings back
Speaker 1: the question, the fair question, is there something wrong with
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris because she didn't look or sound that way
Speaker 1: at the so called debate, But she often looks and
Speaker 1: sounds that way, which is why she doesn't do interviews
Speaker 1: or press conferences. Right, this is not the only example.
Speaker 3: And as a woman, there is a balance to be
Speaker 3: struck between being tough.
Speaker 5: And being a bitch.
Speaker 1: I mean, but this stuff today, and there's more of it.
Speaker 1: We can't play all of it, or we wouldn't get
Speaker 1: to anything else. But I think you probably already got
Speaker 1: a good feel for it. It is an infectious laugh, though,
Speaker 1: isn't it.
Speaker 6: Madame Vice President. I'm switching gears again. A quick question.
Speaker 6: I want to talk to you about gun control. So
Speaker 6: you've said you support an assault weapons ban and universal
Speaker 6: background checks, and we actually learned during the debate that
Speaker 6: you are a gun owner. But in cities like Philadelphia,
Speaker 6: handguns are responsible for most homicides and violent crime. The
Speaker 6: most recent FBI data shows handguns we're involved in fifty
Speaker 6: nine percent of in our country. How will you address
Speaker 6: the issue of the use of handguns because a push
Speaker 6: for an assault weapons ban only addresses a significant but
Speaker 6: small part of the problem.
Speaker 3: So, first of all, yes, I am a gun owner,
Speaker 3: and Tim Walls is a gun owner, and we're not
Speaker 3: trying to take anybody's guns away from them, but we
Speaker 3: do need an assault weapons ban. Assault weapons.
Speaker 1: Sorry, but she didn't answer the question right. So this
Speaker 1: particular questioner wants an answer.
Speaker 3: Are designed to kill a lot of human beings quickly
Speaker 3: and have no place and have no place I'm going
Speaker 3: to get to it, yes, and have no place on
Speaker 3: the streets of a civil society. We need universal background checks, which,
Speaker 3: to your point about handguns, is about saying that it
Speaker 3: is just reasonable to want reasonable gun safety laws that
Speaker 3: say we should do background checks, that we ought to know.
Speaker 3: It's just reasonable. You might want to know before someone
Speaker 3: can buy a lethal weapon if they've been found by
Speaker 3: a court to be a danger to themselves or others.
Speaker 3: You might just want to know.
Speaker 6: If we do understand that. But you're asking about I'm
Speaker 6: asking specifically about handguns because many of those handguns aren't
Speaker 6: purchased at place. Apply to handguns, yeah, they do, but
Speaker 6: in many instances those handguns aren't even bought lawfully.
Speaker 3: Yes, which is why I also have been very adamant
Speaker 3: for years. In fact, I myself protested at a gun
Speaker 3: show probably ten fifteen years ago about the gun show
Speaker 3: loophole and why we need to close that, because what
Speaker 3: ends up happening is that gun shows at flea.
Speaker 1: Marts, criminals or gun dealers.
Speaker 3: Shows are not existingly in the past required to register
Speaker 3: their sales and so you are exactly right that a
Speaker 3: lot of homicides, for example, a good number them I
Speaker 3: statistic in front of my mind, are committed with illegally
Speaker 3: purchased guns. And that's why we need to address each
Speaker 3: entry point in the issue, including universal background checks, closing
Speaker 3: the gun show loophole, and what we need to do
Speaker 3: as a general matter to focus not only on reaction
Speaker 3: to crime, but prevention of crime. So you're raising a
Speaker 3: very important issue that has many facets, including what we
Speaker 3: need to do in terms of reasonable gun safety laws,
Speaker 3: and what we need to do around crime prevention, what
Speaker 3: we need to do around crime deterrence. But listen, I
Speaker 3: have personally prosecuted homicide cases. I have held the hands
Speaker 3: of mothers who have come to me crime who have
Speaker 3: said I only want to talk to Kamala because they
Speaker 3: knew when they sat down I would treat them with.
Speaker 1: The DA And it goes on and out, but in
Speaker 1: the end, an unsatisfied customer in terms of that question
Speaker 1: keeps pushing on handguns. But again it goes back to
Speaker 1: the way these frauds from ABC, the way these frauds
Speaker 1: protected her at the debate. If she had been pushed,
Speaker 1: if she'd been pushed on that first question that she
Speaker 1: refused to answer, Hey, are people better off today than
Speaker 1: they were four years ago? She would have went straight
Speaker 1: word salad, and I think that thing falls apart for her.
Speaker 1: But we'll play more of that sound eight five five
Speaker 1: four zero five eight two five to five the number
Speaker 1: text d an five seven seven three nine lines of jam.
Speaker 1: Next segment we'll devote to a callers and text. You're
Speaker 1: on the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 2: And now back to the Dan Kapliss Show podcast.
Speaker 7: They spend only two days since somebody allegedly tried to
Speaker 7: kill Donald Trump again, and you're here at the podium
Speaker 7: in the White House briefing room calling him a threat?
Speaker 7: How many more assassination attempts on Donald Trump until the
Speaker 7: president and the vice president and you pick a different
Speaker 7: word to describe Trump other than threat.
Speaker 8: Peter, if anything from this administration, I actually completely disagree
Speaker 8: with the premise of your question. The question that you're asking.
Speaker 8: It is also incredibly dangerous in the way that you're
Speaker 8: asking it.
Speaker 1: Oh, I got to step there, and then I'll continue it.
Speaker 1: This is the new thing on the left right whenever
Speaker 1: you expose them, whenever you raise a topic whenever you
Speaker 1: ask a question that they don't have a good answer to, Oh,
Speaker 1: it's dangerous. It's dangerous for you to be filling in
Speaker 1: the blank, asking this question, making this argument, etc. That's
Speaker 1: their go to and it's all part of this censorship.
Speaker 1: And you see it right here. You see it in Colorado,
Speaker 1: you see it in the left in Colorado. It's all
Speaker 1: part of this censorship where they try to censor, shut down, prevent,
Speaker 1: intimidate people from making arguments or on a radio show
Speaker 1: guest son, if the left is afraid that they won't
Speaker 1: be able to counter those arguments. It's something that's global
Speaker 1: among the left in America right now. It's pervasive. It's
Speaker 1: very dangerous. Because we played other sound earlier and we
Speaker 1: will again soon of Hillary Clinton talking about civil and
Speaker 1: criminal penalties for speech the left doesn't like. And obviously
Speaker 1: we've seen what's already happened under this administration. So let's
Speaker 1: continue this.
Speaker 8: Because American people are watching. And to say that, to
Speaker 8: say that from an administration who has consistently condemned political violence,
Speaker 8: from an administration where the president called the former president
Speaker 8: and was thankful, grateful that.
Speaker 1: He was okay, but it not provided him with the
Speaker 1: protection he clearly needed. Right, it's this administration that controls
Speaker 1: the Secret Service. Trump obviously did not have adequate protection
Speaker 1: before Pennsylvania. Everybody knew that, and the administration knew that
Speaker 1: Iran was actively trying to assassinate Trump. And then even
Speaker 1: after Pennsylvania, Trump still didn't have adequate protection on Sunday,
Speaker 1: Thank god that great Secret Service agents saw what he
Speaker 1: or she saw, but he didn't have adequate protection.
Speaker 8: An administration who has called out January sixth, called out
Speaker 8: the attack to Paul Pelosi called out and said, we
Speaker 8: need to lower the temperature after the Butler incident. And
Speaker 8: now for you to make that kind of comment in
Speaker 8: your question, because your question involved a comment in a statement,
Speaker 8: and you know it is that is also incredibly dangerous
Speaker 8: when we have been very clear in condemning political violence.
Speaker 1: See's the one being dangerous when she chose. And by
Speaker 1: the way, the backdrop for this, and I'll go to
Speaker 1: our lines, is that she chose, meaning Biden chose, Harris chose,
Speaker 1: the White House chose today at the press conference before
Speaker 1: Deucy said that they chose to come out, and they
Speaker 1: chose to use that podium to once again call Trump
Speaker 1: a threat to democracy. We can talk separately about whether
Speaker 1: they should be able to do that. But knowing that
Speaker 1: there's a real possibility that this assassin would be assassin
Speaker 1: had zeroed in on that particular phrase, they choose to
Speaker 1: double down on it from the podium today. That was
Speaker 1: the backdrop for Deucey's question. But I do want to
Speaker 1: talk separately about, hey, whether that should be off limits.
Speaker 1: David and Boulder, you're on the Dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 5: Welcome, Hey, Dan. I'm all falling today because regardless to
Speaker 5: your first you opened up both I think the four
Speaker 5: o'clock and five o'clock hour with the sound from Tama
Speaker 5: speaking about picture to day. Well, you're a little behind
Speaker 5: the times because my seventh grade daughter, who you spends
Speaker 5: Tuesday nights with me and for me right before your
Speaker 5: show started, that wasn't going to happen for me tonight.
Speaker 5: Wasn't gona have dinner and spend the night because school
Speaker 5: picture date is tomorrow too important? You're gonna spend that
Speaker 5: extra time.
Speaker 1: Garris has a seven year old old turn but.
Speaker 5: It's important for these children. So I think it shows
Speaker 5: how sweet and tender, no and big hearted complent is David.
Speaker 1: First of all, did you listen to the sound let alone?
Speaker 1: As I mentioned in that segment, have you seen the
Speaker 1: video the way she appeared? I mean, at this point,
Speaker 1: our best hope is that Putin and g and the
Speaker 1: Ayatola's drowned and they're saliva as they drool over the
Speaker 1: prospect of her being commander in chief? Have you seen
Speaker 1: that video?
Speaker 5: I'm not seeing the video.
Speaker 1: There's something wrong there. There's something wrong the.
Speaker 5: Full woman, super tender and sweet and gone.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, David, I'd recommend that you watched the video,
Speaker 1: but just listening to that sound that, yeah, there's something
Speaker 1: off there.
Speaker 5: I'm saying, she understands the way the country think.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well, if that's your takeaway, my friend, And
Speaker 1: then tell me why are we what is it? Six
Speaker 1: weeks ago she was installed in a dark of night,
Speaker 1: closed door deal. Why hasn't she done a presser yet?
Speaker 1: Why is this just her third attempt at at a
Speaker 1: quote interview?
Speaker 5: Seems like a great strategy, So yeah, oh really.
Speaker 1: Yeah, great strategy. Okay, thank you, my friend. And why
Speaker 1: she want a second debate? That yeah, okay, it doesn't
Speaker 1: quite answer why she wants a second debate, but appreciate
Speaker 1: the call. Eight five to five for zero five A
Speaker 1: two five five the numbers. She wants a second debate
Speaker 1: desperately because she knows she didn't get it done at
Speaker 1: the first debate. Americans have two big questions, how is
Speaker 1: she going to be different than Biden? And why did
Speaker 1: she change her position so much? She didn't even try
Speaker 1: to answer either of them, So she needs another debate
Speaker 1: to try to reach the American people. You're not going
Speaker 1: to reach enough American people through these individual interviews now,
Speaker 1: and she's just going to hurt herself doing them. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying that every answer to every question is going
Speaker 1: to become a Trump campaign ad, but a lot of
Speaker 1: them are eight five for zero five A two five
Speaker 1: five the number. Speaking of which, when we come back,
Speaker 1: there's not time to squeeze it. In this segment. When
Speaker 1: we come back, I'm going to play some sound. If,
Speaker 1: like me, you want Trump to win, I'm going to
Speaker 1: play some sound that's going to put maybe the biggest
Speaker 1: smile of this entire election season on your face. We're
Speaker 1: going to talk about some current poll results, but then
Speaker 1: it's going to be the sound off a CBS broadcast
Speaker 1: that I think is really going to drive home the
Speaker 1: point and the point I was making earlier, the wait
Speaker 1: a second, I think there's a real good chance in
Speaker 1: the end this election is going to break big that
Speaker 1: it is just not going to be that close eight
Speaker 1: five five for zero five A two five five the
Speaker 1: number text d A N five seven seven thirty nine. Dan,
Speaker 1: what a great point from a texture and centennial. I
Speaker 1: wish someone would ask her what kind of gun she owns?
Speaker 9: Oh?
Speaker 1: Yeah, wouldn't that be a great question? And it takes
Speaker 1: a village, and there's a villager right there with that text. Yeah, Dan,
Speaker 1: texter says, who would ever want Taylor Swift for president?
Speaker 1: Actually you did several years ago on a solo show.
Speaker 1: And then the Texter goes on to pretend to quote me.
Speaker 1: I'll respond to that heinous accusation. You're on the Dan
Speaker 1: Caplas Show.
Speaker 2: You're listening to the Dan Caplis Show podcast.
Speaker 10: Charlemagne, Hey, I was calling him out that interview which
Speaker 10: Kamala Kamala bomb over the weekend in Philly.
Speaker 2: Oh the local interview in minute long.
Speaker 10: And she she came on with the same spield what
Speaker 10: you gonna do for the economy?
Speaker 5: Oh well, I was raised in middle class.
Speaker 10: Man, we didn't ask you that.
Speaker 11: There's no need for you to be that on script, uh,
Speaker 11: in a conversation because all that the guy after the
Speaker 11: guys they named two things for me that y'all going
Speaker 11: to do for the economy or something like that. That
Speaker 11: was not the time to go into the script about
Speaker 11: being raised in the middle class.
Speaker 1: Just tell the two things. See, that's my point. I mean,
Speaker 1: people are smart, people get it. And I understand the
Speaker 1: angst over this election because the stakes are so stunningly high,
Speaker 1: right And I know this sounds naive and cheerleaderish, but
Speaker 1: it's not meant to be. It's based on forty years
Speaker 1: of experience in a really intense environment, which is trying
Speaker 1: cases to juries. And some of the best advice I
Speaker 1: ever got early was, hey, listen, man, that this stuff, Yeah,
Speaker 1: this stuff is high stakes. This stuff is very stressful.
Speaker 1: But here's here's how you deal with that. Trust the jurors,
Speaker 1: Trust the jersey. And it doesn't mean in every case,
Speaker 1: every time, for one hundred years, every single jury is
Speaker 1: going to get it right. That's not the point. But overall,
Speaker 1: trust the jurors and forty years later, trying cases at
Speaker 1: some of the best advice I've ever received talking about
Speaker 1: perfection every single case, every single issue over all these decades. No,
Speaker 1: but overall, clear cut, no question about it. You can
Speaker 1: absolutely trust the jurors. Same thing in America. Just trust
Speaker 1: trust that people can see these truths and enough people
Speaker 1: to decide the outcome the right way, just like with juries.
Speaker 1: So yeah, and that's why you listen to that call
Speaker 1: and Charlemagne. I won't use the full name of the
Speaker 1: show because I think it's blasphemous, but a very very
Speaker 1: popular show in America, including a very sizable African American audience.
Speaker 1: People get it, people get her, and that's why I
Speaker 1: said as soon as she was installed, No, America is
Speaker 1: not going to elect this left wing radical from San Francisco.
Speaker 1: And here's a not the absolute proof in and of itself,
Speaker 1: but here's something I think you're really going to enjoy hearing.
Speaker 2: And this is.
Speaker 1: This is against this backdrop. Okay, we look at Nevada, right,
Speaker 1: key swing state, and we look at it Nevada, and
Speaker 1: the polling right now, Real Clear Politics average has Harris
Speaker 1: up one point two. And if that's the way we
Speaker 1: go into election month or election.
Speaker 2: Day, that's great.
Speaker 1: For Trump, because in the past the margins for the
Speaker 1: Democrat have been bigger than that and the race has
Speaker 1: been much closer. So if that's our margin going into
Speaker 1: election day, that is a great thing. But then then
Speaker 1: listen to this on CBS. This is a CBS report,
Speaker 1: So this is actually excuse me on the ground. And
Speaker 1: before you listen to this on CBS, this isn't Fox.
Speaker 1: Please consider my premise, which is this, in a situation
Speaker 1: like this, I think you have so many people just
Speaker 1: giving the socially acceptable response to polsters, right, because we're
Speaker 1: living in a politically charged era where if you oppose
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris it couldn't possibly be because she doesn't have
Speaker 1: even the basic skills to be president, or or she's
Speaker 1: a far left you know, extreme radical, or any of
Speaker 1: that stuff. No, you must be a racist if you're
Speaker 1: not supporting Harris. So goes the argument, right, and you
Speaker 1: see all of the different ways that conservatives now are
Speaker 1: being pursued through lawfare and other things. So obviously in
Speaker 1: this polling, you're going to get a lot of people
Speaker 1: who just aren't willing to answer if they're going to
Speaker 1: say something that might quote get them in trouble. Because
Speaker 1: are they really sure who they're talking to or responding to,
Speaker 1: you know, or at that point they're going to say
Speaker 1: the socially acceptable thing. So that's why I think these
Speaker 1: polls are so off in her favor. But here is
Speaker 1: exhibit a on that. Okay, CBS, CBS report on the
Speaker 1: ground actually going into Nevada and interviewing people.
Speaker 2: Listen to this.
Speaker 12: But what was really incredible is in every single restaurant
Speaker 12: of the people willing to talk to us, we could
Speaker 12: only find one hair supporter in every restaurant, and we
Speaker 12: left no stone on. I approached every single person.
Speaker 1: That's on CBS, one Harris supporter actually on the ground.
Speaker 12: What issue is most important too.
Speaker 1: I'm extremely concerned about quorder illegals.
Speaker 11: They gotta go.
Speaker 12: People are coming here seeking asylum.
Speaker 4: Holl only, they're coming here for the freebies.
Speaker 13: When people talk about immigration, they're thinking, we're saying we
Speaker 13: don't want immigrants of any kind.
Speaker 4: And that's not what.
Speaker 3: People were saying here.
Speaker 12: People are saying that there are people who have come
Speaker 12: here legally.
Speaker 8: Why do they get pushed aside to allow people who
Speaker 8: have not even worked one day in our country, They
Speaker 8: have not paid into the system.
Speaker 12: I took my brisket, a mac and Chee's with me
Speaker 12: to catch Ken Lasker with a to go order. How
Speaker 12: closely are you watching this election?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 4: Very closely.
Speaker 12: He was the only hair supporter we met at lunch,
Speaker 12: even though Washoe County has historically been pretty politically split.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so a swing county in Nevada, they could find
Speaker 1: one hair supporter. And then you heard the detail. You
Speaker 1: heard that, the detail about, Hey, what these folks are
Speaker 1: really caring about? And this helps explain why the media,
Speaker 1: the leftist media, is losing their minds over the Ohio story,
Speaker 1: and they're still all over that today, claiming it's not
Speaker 1: a legitimate story, etc. Because they know anything that calls
Speaker 1: attention to the consequences of Kamala Harris's open border is
Speaker 1: kryptonite for the left. It's toxic, it's killer for them,
Speaker 1: and so that they have to now try to censor
Speaker 1: and shut down any discussion of any story that focuses
Speaker 1: people on the consequences of the Biden Harris open border.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you just heard it.
Speaker 1: You just heard it there in Nevada on the ground CBS,
Speaker 1: and you can imagine Ryan, they were sorry, not getting emotional.
Speaker 1: It's peanut butter.
Speaker 2: They were probably going there.
Speaker 1: They were probably thank you for saying that, since you
Speaker 1: would immediately take over this timeslot. I'm sure it's very sincere.
Speaker 1: I noticed you were not going for the defibrillator, Bleck says.
Speaker 1: But you could picture CBS in that diner in Nevada,
Speaker 1: in that swing area, that swing county. I'll bet you
Speaker 1: they went into the bathroom. They were looking under stalls.
Speaker 1: They were trying to find whoever they could possibly find
Speaker 1: and important.
Speaker 9: I can stand a flashbat oh wow, okay LSD No, oh,
Speaker 9: I've never done it.
Speaker 4: I know.
Speaker 9: I was thinking of my dad. So Nevada, there's two
Speaker 9: counties that matter. It's Clark County.
Speaker 1: Fine, their state must have been a lot of fun
Speaker 1: it was.
Speaker 9: There's two counties that matter really in Nevada, Clark County,
Speaker 9: that's where Las Vegas is. That's the southern portion of
Speaker 9: the state that tends to swing left, and that's what
Speaker 9: keeps Nevada blue. Washoe County, though, is heavily populated. Reno
Speaker 9: is there and it is home to a lot of
Speaker 9: people that you heard right there. It's middle of the road.
Speaker 9: It can go purple, it can go red, it can
Speaker 9: go blue. But if WASHO goes heavily red, that might
Speaker 9: help offset a tiny bit whatever happens in Vegas. And
Speaker 9: that's where no tax on tips comes into play, and
Speaker 9: why Kamala Harris felt compelled to copy Trump on that policy.
Speaker 1: You have no interest in my flashback. Everybody listening has
Speaker 1: had that experience in life, right where all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: it didn't say it coming, You just think or see
Speaker 1: or smell something and you get this flashback. So when
Speaker 1: I talked about CBS looking under the stall doors and bathrooms,
Speaker 1: I had this flashback. I'm in the men's room at
Speaker 1: the University Memorial Center, which is a student union building
Speaker 1: in Boulder, and there is a leftist mob chasing me, oh,
Speaker 1: chasing me out of a student government meeting because they
Speaker 1: didn't like a bill I was proposing. And so they were,
Speaker 1: I'm sure at least going to beat me severely, right,
Speaker 1: they weren't chasing me to get my autograph. So I'm
Speaker 1: in the I run into this bathroom and I jump
Speaker 1: in and I close the door, and I'm standing on
Speaker 1: top of the toilet and this mob comes into the
Speaker 1: bathroom looking for me, and they're screaming and they're yelling,
Speaker 1: and it had to be Guardian Angel stuff, right. Nobody
Speaker 1: bothered to look under the door of the stall, right,
Speaker 1: So yeah, I had that.
Speaker 11: Wow.
Speaker 1: Talk about a weird flashback. Mary in Denver hopefully does
Speaker 1: not have that kind of story. You're on the Dan
Speaker 1: Kapla show. Welcome Mary, Yes.
Speaker 4: About the bird flu Yeah.
Speaker 1: Good, good transition.
Speaker 5: Yeah No, no, not really.
Speaker 4: Could they pull another lock down?
Speaker 1: No chance, too late.
Speaker 4: Yes, I thought they'd do that maybe around election day.
Speaker 1: Mary, listen, I understand all these suspicions, right when you
Speaker 1: look at what the left has done. Now he's tried
Speaker 1: to put the man in jail because they can't beat
Speaker 1: him at the ballot box. All the other stuff the
Speaker 1: left is donnight. I understand you being concerned, but no,
Speaker 1: it's too late for any of that. And you know what,
Speaker 1: that's a good thing, Mary, because when we come back
Speaker 1: and thank you for sending this up, I'm going to
Speaker 1: give you some hard numbers out of Pennsylvania comparing the
Speaker 1: number of mail in ballots requested, because there they have
Speaker 1: to request him mail in ballots requested so far in
Speaker 1: this cycle by Republicans versus Democrats. Little spoiler alert or
Speaker 1: teas called a tease in twenty twenty, so many more
Speaker 1: Democrats requested than Republicans. Hmmm, what's going on in this cycle? Yeah,
Speaker 1: you can dance to that.
Speaker 2: You're on the Dan.
Speaker 1: Capla Show.
Speaker 2: And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 13: And my judgment, it's not in the best interest of
Speaker 13: our state or our nation. Have the same federal agencies
Speaker 13: that are seeking to prosecute Donald Trump leading this investigation,
Speaker 13: especially when the most serious, straightforward defense constitutes a violation
Speaker 13: of state law but not federal law. In addition to
Speaker 13: holding the suspect accountable, the public deserves to know the
Speaker 13: truth about how this assassination came to be, and I've
Speaker 13: directed all state agencies to work expeditiously to be able
Speaker 13: to uncover the truth. In addition to holding this suspect accountable.
Speaker 1: God love them, Ron de Santis. Do you think if
Speaker 1: the left right now could substitute DeSantis for Trump they
Speaker 1: would do that? Who would they rather run against?
Speaker 2: Right now?
Speaker 9: We knew how this is going to go, Dan, When
Speaker 9: Rohnd de Santis assumes the mantle, and I believe that
Speaker 9: he will in twenty twenty eight, they're going to give
Speaker 9: us every reason why he's just.
Speaker 2: Like Donald Trump, only worse. And they're going to give
Speaker 2: the reasons why.
Speaker 9: Because Rond de Santis is actually really smart and he's
Speaker 9: Ivy League educated in a jag attorney, and he'll use
Speaker 9: Trump's policies as a force for evil and he'll be
Speaker 9: better at it because he's smarter about it. That's what's coming.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, no, I think that, listen. I think just
Speaker 1: would be a great president. Will be, but I think that,
Speaker 1: and yeah, I think there's a good chance he will be.
Speaker 1: But I think in a heartbeat, the left would rather
Speaker 1: have Decantis right now than Trump a heartbeat, because with Trump,
Speaker 1: what do you have?
Speaker 2: With Trump?
Speaker 1: Obviously, the left is absolutely terrified of him, because what
Speaker 1: you have is a guy who America had four really
Speaker 1: good years under compared to the four years under Biden
Speaker 1: and Harris. So you have a guy who's already done
Speaker 1: the job successfully and a guy who has this intensely
Speaker 1: loyal base and wait for it, key dynamic can turn
Speaker 1: out a lot of people who don't normally vote. And
Speaker 1: a guy who is fearless, truly a fighter, is absolutely
Speaker 1: fearless and will not be cowed by the relentless censorship
Speaker 1: efforts of the left, and let's face it, assassination is
Speaker 1: the ultimate form of censorship. And obviously the guy who
Speaker 1: tried to took him out Sunday is from the left.
Speaker 1: So no, they would much rather have, which is no
Speaker 1: insult to DeSantis. It's a testament to Trump. They would
Speaker 1: much have with the left DeSantis than Trump. Eight five
Speaker 1: five for zero five A two five five the number.
Speaker 1: Rossio in Denver. You're on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 5: Welcome, mister capitalist.
Speaker 3: How are you doing.
Speaker 2: I'm living the dream?
Speaker 1: How about you?
Speaker 4: I'm going to be brief and quick. I'm tired of
Speaker 4: the left blaming the right for the assassination attempts on
Speaker 4: Trump because history has shown us that it's always been
Speaker 4: enough fun incident either race, failed attempts or successful attempts.
Speaker 4: We have Andrew Jackson as president in agent sixty five,
Speaker 4: Lincoln Garfield and McKinley from eighteen sixty twive to nineteen old.
Speaker 4: We have Jack Kennedy in nineteen sixty three, Heady Roosevelt
Speaker 4: as a candidate in nineteen twelve, the best Kennedy senior
Speaker 4: in nineteen sixty eight. You're four twice by two people,
Speaker 4: one being a sitiphan of Charles Mann against Zero IV
Speaker 4: and Ronald Reagan and now Trump twice. When are people
Speaker 4: gonna wake up and learn their history? Yeah, this really
Speaker 4: incuriates me by the yellow, yellow journalist media. Is that call?
Speaker 1: Yeah, Rassio, I appreciate the call that. The key is
Speaker 1: this cannot be the new normal. Right. And it's like
Speaker 1: before Sunday you would have think Pennsylvania never happened the
Speaker 1: way the media was treating it, right, not a single
Speaker 1: question related to that in any way, shape or form
Speaker 1: at the alleged debate. Yeah, and so this cannot be
Speaker 1: allowed to become the new normal. But I think many
Speaker 1: in the leftist media are trying to normalize it. Oh,
Speaker 1: Trump brought it on himself, Trump's rhetoric. This this a
Speaker 1: that is, if it's somehow justified. Big question I have, Ryan,
Speaker 1: and I got to get to this next text. But
Speaker 1: a big question I have is is what what at
Speaker 1: this point can we expect the effect on the election
Speaker 1: outcome to be? I mean this two assassination attempts on
Speaker 1: the same candidate. The first he handles in an incredibly
Speaker 1: heroic fashion. The second he doesn't allow to slow him
Speaker 1: down at all. What's the impact on election day going
Speaker 1: to be.
Speaker 9: I don't think we've even seen that impact in the
Speaker 9: polls yet. It seems like there hasn't been a lot
Speaker 9: of major inflection points, even when it seemed like there
Speaker 9: should be.
Speaker 2: That the die is cast in.
Speaker 9: Many ways, there's a very narrow margin here, Dan, of persuadables.
Speaker 1: That is an interesting point in terms of the die
Speaker 1: being cast. I think you may darn well be right
Speaker 1: that it really is. I just believe that there's a
Speaker 1: very good chance this election is not as close as
Speaker 1: it appears, and that it breaks big in Trump's favor
Speaker 1: in the end, or if God forbid, it's not in
Speaker 1: Trump's favor, it breaks big the other way. But so
Speaker 1: many reasons to think it will be in Trump's favor.
Speaker 1: I'm going to talk about this on the show tomorrow
Speaker 1: if I can shift gears for a second, Dan, one
Speaker 1: of the stupid motorcycle lane splitters just hit my side
Speaker 1: view mirror and broke it, and of course kept going.
Speaker 1: It's impossible for me to be able to get a
Speaker 1: plate number anything. Thanks Governor Poulis. I have had so
Speaker 1: much which, so much chaos just in my own driving
Speaker 1: right now from these lane splitters. It was supposed to
Speaker 1: be lane filtering, right, like if it was ever going
Speaker 1: to really operate that way. So much chaos and you
Speaker 1: know there's going to be death and destruction, but in
Speaker 1: the meantime there's so much unnecessary aggravation and tension on
Speaker 1: the roadway because Polus and the Left have now allowed
Speaker 1: this lane splitting. And what a great text end the
Speaker 1: day with Dan Russefron Parker called to remind listeners that
Speaker 1: ninety percent of Taylor's songs come from picking the wrong guy.
Speaker 1: Another text, Dan, you should know as well as anyone
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift made her billions by choosing the wrong person.
Speaker 1: Good stuff anyway, Thank you to everybody who called and texted.
Speaker 1: Apologies to those we didn't get to, but please do
Speaker 1: call and text us tomorrow. Obviously these same issues are
Speaker 1: going to be relevant then and so much more fresh
Speaker 1: and including Okay, Mexican cartel, Thanks Kamlin jareded officially here
Speaker 1: in Colorado. Thank you Ryan and Alexa