Speaker 1: This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast edition
Speaker 1: of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to give
Speaker 1: us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
Speaker 1: and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
Speaker 1: single day on your favorite podcast platform. Yeah, but now,
Speaker 1: how are we going to cross Broadway to get to
Speaker 1: the state Capitol. I just all is lost, my friend
Speaker 1: Polis giving up the ghost right on his bridge to nowhere,
Speaker 1: so we will not have that twenty eight million dollar
Speaker 1: walkway over Broadway. Hopefully instead, Polus in the LAFT can
Speaker 1: just enforce the law, clean up Broadway and people can
Speaker 1: cross at the intersection three or three seven one, three
Speaker 1: eight two five five the number. Hey we're talking about?
Speaker 1: You know, it's a big deal when when a sitting president,
Speaker 1: to particularly one with the credibility of Donald Trump and
Speaker 1: on a roll right now, comes out and says is
Speaker 1: a predecessor Barack Obama that is guilty of treason? That's
Speaker 1: a big deal. Does that signal that Trump is expecting
Speaker 1: his doj to bring charges? If it does, I don't
Speaker 1: think it does. But if it does, then I don't
Speaker 1: think we're going to see treason charges because that just
Speaker 1: wouldn't apply if the allegations are true here and I'll
Speaker 1: break that down as we get through the conversation. If,
Speaker 1: and I underline if, because again I don't expect charges.
Speaker 1: I think it would be more something in the seditious
Speaker 1: conspiracy line. And that's because treason is so narrowly defined.
Speaker 1: Can you believe the entire history of this nation, there
Speaker 1: have only been forty four zero trees in charges brought
Speaker 1: and treson the only crime defined by the constitution itself.
Speaker 1: So let's roll that tape and then we've got great
Speaker 1: textures on this, both sides of it. Do you think
Speaker 1: Obama is guilty of crimes? If so, what and do
Speaker 1: you want to see a prosecution? Do you expect to
Speaker 1: see a prosecution? Cut forty two, please, my friend, cut
Speaker 1: forty two.
Speaker 2: If you look at that those papers, they have a
Speaker 2: stone culled and it was President Obama.
Speaker 3: It wasn't lots of people all over the place do
Speaker 3: but the leader of the gang was President Obama.
Speaker 2: Barack Hussein Obama. Have you heard of him? And except
Speaker 2: for the fact that he gets shielded by.
Speaker 3: The press for his entire life, that's the one they look.
Speaker 2: He's guilty Is that a question? You know, I like
Speaker 2: to say, let's give it time. It's there. He's guilty.
Speaker 3: They this was treason, This was every word you can
Speaker 3: think of.
Speaker 2: They tried to steal the.
Speaker 3: Election, they tried to obfuscate the election. They did things
Speaker 3: that nobody's ever even imagined, even in other countries.
Speaker 1: So what do you think? What do you think? Do
Speaker 1: you expect to see a criminal prosecution here? Do you
Speaker 1: think Obama is guilty of some kind of provable crime?
Speaker 1: Three or three seven one three eight two five five
Speaker 1: takes dam five seven seven three nine. Ryan, I'm about
Speaker 1: to drop the mic on this one and offer what
Speaker 1: I think is conclusive proof that there will not be
Speaker 1: a prosecution of Barack Obama. And any guesses, And this
Speaker 1: is unfair to you because I know you're back there.
Speaker 1: You're the OCTOPI man, You're doing a million different things
Speaker 1: at once. But and anybody have any guesses on what
Speaker 1: my drop is my analytical point that will I think
Speaker 1: cosmos to say, boy, Dan, you're right, We're not going
Speaker 1: to see criminal charges here. Any guests on that? D
Speaker 1: A N five seven seven through nine. If you want
Speaker 1: a text, if you're a throwback like me, can you
Speaker 1: enjoy a good old fashioned conversation, Agree or disagree? Three
Speaker 1: oh three seven one three A two five five the number.
Speaker 4: Not to be clear.
Speaker 5: Dan, Are you saying no prosecutions against Barack Obama? Because
Speaker 5: I'm with you on that one. I think the odds
Speaker 5: are heavily against that happening. If i'd have bet money,
Speaker 5: that's not But what about a Brennan? What about a clapper?
Speaker 5: What about a Komi?
Speaker 1: We'll get to that. Did you ever buy or have
Speaker 1: you ever seen a clapper? Remember that invention in the tart?
Speaker 4: Yeah, highlights on and off? That's right?
Speaker 1: Yeah, okay, so I could get awkward at a supporting men.
Speaker 1: But anyway, Yeah, here's how we know there's not going
Speaker 1: to be a criminal prosecution of Barack Obama because President
Speaker 1: Trump has publicly declared him guilty. If they were actually
Speaker 1: preparing to indict him, to prosecute him, President Trump would
Speaker 1: not have posted that video or reposted the video of
Speaker 1: Obama being put in handcuffs in the Oval Office while
Speaker 1: Trump smiled and laughed, and President Trump wouldn't have come
Speaker 1: out and heard the sound said what we just heard
Speaker 1: in that sound?
Speaker 6: Right?
Speaker 1: If there was really going to be a prosecution. President
Speaker 1: Trump would not have done either of those, saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think it's that clear. I think what's going on
Speaker 1: is President Trump is righteous anger because like him, I
Speaker 1: do believe that Barack Obama. I'm talking about moral culpability here.
Speaker 1: I believe Barack Obama intentionally intentionally launched and supported this
Speaker 1: coup attempt by falsely implying that President Trump hadcluded with
Speaker 1: Russia to win the office, and so many bad things
Speaker 1: flowed from that. Right, But I think I do not
Speaker 1: expect a criminal prosecution. I think President Obama way too
Speaker 1: smart to have put himself in a position to be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about moral culpability and a grave disservice to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in this nation. I do believe that occurred.
Speaker 1: So what I think we're witnessing, my friend, is President
Speaker 1: Trump using his platform to try to convict Obama in
Speaker 1: the court of public opinion, knowing that there's not going
Speaker 1: to be a criminal prosecution. Sounds like you agree.
Speaker 5: I can't counter that, because again, if I'm a betting man,
Speaker 5: I'll believe it when I see it. The publicans will
Speaker 5: take it up a notch to that level. Whereas we
Speaker 5: know dan situation reversed even far less than that. Specious
Speaker 5: evidence of you know, conjecture led to President Trump being
Speaker 5: the target of weaponized lawfair by the Department of Justice
Speaker 5: under Biden.
Speaker 1: But look what happened, and Trump does want that to
Speaker 1: be him. I mean, that helped take down the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: That was a really significant part of Trump's victory. Like
Speaker 1: we were saying all along to the campaign, Americans don't
Speaker 1: want to live in a Banana Republic, and that includes
Speaker 1: a lot of people who don't like Trump. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't think I don't think Trump has any interest
Speaker 1: in his DOJ bringing charges that they cannot prove, cannot
Speaker 1: win on, and I don't think we're going to see
Speaker 1: any of that. So your good question, you know about
Speaker 1: Clapper and the rest of them. You know, I'm not
Speaker 1: trying to duck it. I just don't have access to
Speaker 1: the information i'd need to answer it. I think they
Speaker 1: were all guilty on a moral level of a grave
Speaker 1: disservice to Trump in this for the reasons I laid out.
Speaker 1: But as you know, it's a grand canyon man between
Speaker 1: that and what you need to go in and bring
Speaker 1: and prove a criminal prosecution. Right, So yeah, I'd say
Speaker 1: ninety nine point nine to one against any charges against
Speaker 1: Obama and then the others. I think it's it's fifty
Speaker 1: to fifty because I can't know what they have and
Speaker 1: what they don't have. So if you're betting, say you're
Speaker 1: betting the Bugatti, which way do you go on this.
Speaker 5: No charges, it's all smoke, And it's really frustrating because
Speaker 5: then it makes it look like Dan that the Democrats,
Speaker 5: when they're empowered, they can get away with whatever the
Speaker 5: hell they want to do, and they're never held to
Speaker 5: account and there's no precedent set and there's no deterrent
Speaker 5: from this happening again in the future.
Speaker 1: Well, I think Trump just set a pretty good precedent
Speaker 1: by beating them, right, But we do have to play
Speaker 1: this because this just this brings it back to the
Speaker 1: reality of what this Democratic Party has become. And it's
Speaker 1: so important that we continue to expose that because that's
Speaker 1: going to be a winning long term And this happens
Speaker 1: to be the current Democrat leader in Congress. How came
Speaker 1: Jeffries cut thirty six place? Donald Trump?
Speaker 7: One has still singularly failed to acknowledge that Russia attacked
Speaker 7: our democracy. It was an act of war by a
Speaker 7: hostile foreign power, perhaps done as part of a conspiracy
Speaker 7: with members of the Trump campaign to sell out our
Speaker 7: democracy and artificially put someone into sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue.
Speaker 1: Here's the question, and I'm not aiming to say, came Jefferies,
Speaker 1: look at the log in my own eye, But here's
Speaker 1: the question. By definition, do people who lie not believe
Speaker 1: in God? Right? And I've never claimed to be perfect
Speaker 1: about anything.
Speaker 6: But.
Speaker 1: I do believe that this is one of the biggies. Right.
Speaker 1: You just can't knowingly lie about people. And I mean
Speaker 1: it's right there in the tens. And I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to get all philosophical or anything, but but just an
Speaker 1: analytical point, you know. And let's use the left as
Speaker 1: an example here. They're not the only people who lie,
Speaker 1: but but right now, it is, it is the core
Speaker 1: principle of the left is to lie. It is a tactical,
Speaker 1: ongoing principle of theirs. And it's insidious and it's obscene,
Speaker 1: and it's it's really cancerous, but it is their tactic
Speaker 1: right and make people disprove the lie. And so to
Speaker 1: do these people who by definition, they just lie, and
Speaker 1: they lie intentionally, They lie deliberately. They lie as part
Speaker 1: of trying to get what they want politically. Does that
Speaker 1: mean they don't believe in God? Got really heavy there, Dan, Well,
Speaker 1: every now and then, what do you think?
Speaker 8: I mean?
Speaker 5: There might be a through line, a lot of it.
Speaker 5: They mean, if you're gonna do a Kamala Harris van
Speaker 5: die Graham, I bet there's a lot of overlap on it.
Speaker 1: What happened to Kelly Beck there with this show?
Speaker 4: Oh well, yeah, they've been diaground?
Speaker 1: Is okay? Because Lord knows what could be going on
Speaker 1: back there?
Speaker 9: Careful?
Speaker 1: Oh no, no, I didn't mean that, my lord. So anyway,
Speaker 1: we'll throw that out there for folks. Three or three
Speaker 1: seven one three A two five five the number text
Speaker 1: d A N five seven seven three nine Quick heads up.
Speaker 1: When we come back, we have to touch on at least
Speaker 1: Denver Mayor Mike Johnston's State of the City address, where
Speaker 1: where he waxed poetic in a manner surpassed only by
Speaker 1: maybe bad Dead Bob. You're on the Dan Caplas.
Speaker 9: Show And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 10: Lee boy should be able to play in girls Sport? No,
Speaker 10: do you believe that is this, Ronald Robin, Yeah.
Speaker 4: This, We'll do a quick rab and then we can
Speaker 4: move past.
Speaker 10: Do you believe that kids under the age of eighteen
Speaker 10: should be able to be put on puberty blockers and
Speaker 10: then cross sex hormones.
Speaker 11: I think parents have to make that decision themselves. I
Speaker 11: think that is too A child is too young at
Speaker 11: eighteen to make that decision has to be made with
Speaker 11: a family and that choice. I think before somebody makes
Speaker 11: a life decision, they have to think twice about that.
Speaker 10: So you disagree then with the Tim Walls policy in
Speaker 10: Minnesota where a child who doesn't get affirmed by his
Speaker 10: parents can go into Minnesota and get jurisdiction there and
Speaker 10: get the parental decision overruled.
Speaker 11: Yeah, look, I think these are a life decisions. And
Speaker 11: I'm also slightly both. I have two minds. I'm not
Speaker 11: two minds, but two strains that influence an opinion. One
Speaker 11: is a life decision, and a child can't make that decision.
Speaker 11: You have to have some moral development and character and judgment,
Speaker 11: and your.
Speaker 1: Diction goes on in a while. I wanted to give
Speaker 1: people a taste that's from Emmanuel obviously positioning for twenty
Speaker 1: eight trying to get a center lane. And it's so
Speaker 1: interesting right that again this study of Jared Polus, that
Speaker 1: that Polus had such an opportunity if he was willing
Speaker 1: to show some courage, and he could have done it,
Speaker 1: you know, in twenty twenty three and just come out
Speaker 1: and said time for a new generation of leadership. Biden
Speaker 1: blah blah blah, no longer up to it, but just
Speaker 1: didn't have the courage to make that move. And so
Speaker 1: Poulis had been positioning to try to pull the con
Speaker 1: that he was a moderate. Is is that's all gone
Speaker 1: now right? He had his moment and he just didn't
Speaker 1: have what it took to take him three or three
Speaker 1: seven one three eight two five five the number text
Speaker 1: d A N five seven seven three nine our own
Speaker 1: Alexa on the line, Alexa, how you doing.
Speaker 12: I'm doing great. I think you can tie Polus and
Speaker 12: Mayor Mikey together. And these two politicians are completely out of.
Speaker 6: Such with reality.
Speaker 12: Poulis with what was it ninety error almost ninety percent
Speaker 12: of people saying no to the bridge ninety three point
Speaker 12: nine percent?
Speaker 1: Who is eighty seven? I know?
Speaker 6: I know?
Speaker 12: And then Mayor Mikey with saying, hey, we all got
Speaker 12: to work together and make this a vibrant city. Well,
Speaker 12: you're the one that said we're going to take care
Speaker 12: of the homeless problem and all these things, and it
Speaker 12: hasn't worked. And I think Denver voters might have been
Speaker 12: sympathetic and said, yeah, raise our taxes, well, we'll help
Speaker 12: the homeless. As you know, mister Calderer says, you know,
Speaker 12: if you want more of something, subsidize it, and we're
Speaker 12: just going to continue getting more and more and more homeless.
Speaker 12: By the way, his one of Mayor Mikey's favorite bars
Speaker 12: is closing down after eighteen years.
Speaker 1: He's he's not.
Speaker 12: Maybe he does because he's definitely out of touch with
Speaker 12: the average citizen that lives in his city.
Speaker 1: You know, let me suggest it tweak on that, Alexa,
Speaker 1: and that is, I personally believe that that both Mayor
Speaker 1: Johnston and Governor Polis are not out of touch. They
Speaker 1: completely understand what the truth is, and they understand where
Speaker 1: people are at. They just don't care and.
Speaker 6: Very very often they just don't.
Speaker 1: Care what the truth is and they don't care what
Speaker 1: the people want. Because if you are and I know
Speaker 1: it's hard for you as just a good, decent, righteous
Speaker 1: person to wrap your minder on this. But if you're
Speaker 1: in democratic politics right now, right in most places in America,
Speaker 1: the only thing that matters to you, because this is
Speaker 1: what that party's become. The only thing that matters to
Speaker 1: you is pleasing the hardcore lefties because that's where the
Speaker 1: big money and power is. Right So with both both
Speaker 1: Polists and Johnston's, it's been kind of a double middle
Speaker 1: finger to Coloraden's because they're looking at the clock. And
Speaker 1: for Johnston, he believes that the really really awful stuff,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's bad enough now, but the really crash
Speaker 1: level stuff isn't going to occur until he's gone gone
Speaker 1: on to the next job. And Polish is betting the
Speaker 1: same thing too, And so I think they know and
Speaker 1: they just don't care. Yeah, I think I think you're right.
Speaker 6: I mean, you just look at our roads.
Speaker 12: I was on c for some of you today and
Speaker 12: it's so atrocious. I mean that we pay these delivery
Speaker 12: fees for all of our packages and such, and where's
Speaker 12: that you know, money going. It's not improving our roads.
Speaker 12: And the money we're paying into the city and County
Speaker 12: of Denver at which I avoid at all costs, is
Speaker 12: not making it a better place.
Speaker 1: Right, But their bet is whether it's Polish justin any
Speaker 1: of them. Right that their bet said, whoever wins the
Speaker 1: DEM primary wins the election. Their bet is the GOP
Speaker 1: cannot win in Colorado no matter how bad the Dems are.
Speaker 1: So you please the hardcore on the left, you get
Speaker 1: your money, you win your primary, it doesn't matter how
Speaker 1: bad you have made things for the people who live
Speaker 1: in your jurisdiction. And that's clearly their operating belief. And
Speaker 1: looking at what happened in twenty and twenty two in Colorado,
Speaker 1: you can see where they got there.
Speaker 12: Yeah, it's really sad. And you know, I really wonder
Speaker 12: in many of the cities who've already seen devastated by
Speaker 12: Democrat leadership, what will it take for the because of
Speaker 12: Denver and Boulder to wake up?
Speaker 1: Well, this will shock you, I mean statewide. I think
Speaker 1: what it'll take is it'll take a combination of just
Speaker 1: all the awful things happening to the state because of
Speaker 1: the left, but the combination of that and the right
Speaker 1: GOP candidate. I think you get one breakthrough GOP win
Speaker 1: at the state level, and assuming she or he is
Speaker 1: you know, everything they need to be to win statewide.
Speaker 1: Then I think the tide begins to shift and change
Speaker 1: dramatically once you get that one breakthrough win, because right
Speaker 1: now that the GOP in Colorado does not have a face,
Speaker 1: right the Republican Party, just to your average good person
Speaker 1: on the street, there's no face of the Colorado Republican Party.
Speaker 1: You get that statewide winner, all of a sudden, that
Speaker 1: person becomes the face if Jane Norton had won that
Speaker 1: US Senate race back in whatever year it was, she
Speaker 1: becomes the face of the GOP in Colorado. And I
Speaker 1: think the entire trajectory is different. But hey, prayers for you.
Speaker 1: You are the toughest Omburst around and I know you've
Speaker 1: got another challenge tomorrow. So we'll all be thinking of you,
Speaker 1: all right, look forward to talking to you. Then, Hey,
Speaker 1: when we come back, President Trump calls Obama directly says
Speaker 1: he committed treason. Do you expect to see a prosecution?
Speaker 1: I'll tell you why I don't.
Speaker 13: You're on the Dan Tapita showstening to the Dan Kaplis
Speaker 13: Show podcast.
Speaker 1: This what you should have done months ago before you
Speaker 1: announced that you were going forward with a bridge.
Speaker 14: Well, we couldn't because there was no bridge for people
Speaker 14: to vote on, right, So I mean it has to
Speaker 14: be in sequence. The people would have not known what
Speaker 14: we were talking about had we done this three months ago,
Speaker 14: because there was no visuals, there was no project. So
Speaker 14: thanks to that, which is all very recent. This is
Speaker 14: all what about a month or two. People have been
Speaker 14: out there, people have been talking about it. You know,
Speaker 14: it's great you go down to corner bar, people saying
Speaker 14: they love it, people say they hate it.
Speaker 1: It's great. People are feeling ownership and passionate about this.
Speaker 1: So what does that all mean and how do we
Speaker 1: kind of decipher that into whether we do this or not?
Speaker 1: Completely untethered from the truth, right, just make stuff up?
Speaker 1: I mean the idea that people are at the corner
Speaker 1: bar talking about this, no bar any of us would
Speaker 1: ever want to go to, and no bar that's ever existed,
Speaker 1: and what you can't go out? I mean, and keep
Speaker 1: in mind, this is a guy whose parents built a
Speaker 1: tremendous greeting card company, I mean, really admirable entrepreneurs. And
Speaker 1: you know he had some success in business as well.
Speaker 1: You tell me you've never heard of focus groups, You've
Speaker 1: never heard of a prototype. You got to go out
Speaker 1: and spend a million and a half bucks, and you know,
Speaker 1: people to draw this nah, you go out, you get
Speaker 1: the concept, you do a focus group, you find out.
Speaker 1: So the whole thing is just so bizarre. But what
Speaker 1: is most important is, and this is what affects your
Speaker 1: life the most, is we've reached this point that I
Speaker 1: never could have imagined, where we now have one major
Speaker 1: political party happens to control virtually all of Colorado that
Speaker 1: there's not only no respect for the truth, but revels
Speaker 1: in lyne It's a primary tactic of theirs to lie.
Speaker 1: It's a point of pride within many on the left.
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about Democrats, but many in power on
Speaker 1: the left. It's a point of pride to lie. And
Speaker 1: so they revel in it, they celebrate it, they refine
Speaker 1: the quote art kind of a dark art, a black art, right,
Speaker 1: because the truth is that if everything doesn't spring off
Speaker 1: the truth, then at that point it's just evil and wrong.
Speaker 1: So we've got a major political party now that's that's
Speaker 1: built on lies and actively practices lying, and that makes
Speaker 1: the climb even tougher. But we can't whine about it.
Speaker 1: We just have to expose them and beat them three
Speaker 1: or three seven one three A two five five text
Speaker 1: d An five seven seven three nine Ryan not to
Speaker 1: be a bummer. I do want to interject this topic though,
Speaker 1: because I don't know the answer to it, and I'm
Speaker 1: trying to reach the vision of wildlife. But as I mentioned,
Speaker 1: as you know, I'm up in the cavin preparing for
Speaker 1: a trial. And I even sent you a picture before
Speaker 1: the show of our our listener, our big eared listener,
Speaker 1: who's now back, this deer who for whatever reason likes
Speaker 1: to just settle in and listen to the show. But
Speaker 1: here's my quandary, and it's very sad, but there is
Speaker 1: another deer obviously seriously injured. I don't know how it happened,
Speaker 1: but it's just kind of limped off behind the cabin.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to reach a wildlife. But if you can't
Speaker 1: reach wildlife, if you can't get wildlife up here quickly enough,
Speaker 1: what are the laws that apply? Is there ever a
Speaker 1: situation where it's legal for a citizen to you mainly
Speaker 1: put down a deer or another animal, because nobody wants
Speaker 1: to see a creature suffer. So if anybody has the
Speaker 1: answer for that, and I know there will be people
Speaker 1: in our audience to do. Do you remember that very compelling
Speaker 1: woman who joined us about six months ago and there
Speaker 1: had been a wounded was it an elk on her
Speaker 1: property stuck in the snow, and then she had been
Speaker 1: calling and trying to get a response, and then the
Speaker 1: elk had perished? Do you remember that conversation? And under
Speaker 1: what circumstances any and maybe none, a citizen is allowed
Speaker 1: to mainly put an animal down?
Speaker 5: Well, if it's suffering, Dan, I think the general consensus
Speaker 5: is that you are within your rights to, you.
Speaker 1: Know, end the suffering. And as that's what I would do,
Speaker 1: I would hope so d A. N. Five seven seven
Speaker 1: thirty nine if anybody has the answer to that. I
Speaker 1: came across at once before and again not to be
Speaker 1: a bomber, but I'm sure people encounter this right it's
Speaker 1: through life. But out on the roadway, I didn't hit
Speaker 1: the dog. Somebody else did, but there was a dog
Speaker 1: suffering in the road. And I did not own a
Speaker 1: gun at that time. If I had, you know, that
Speaker 1: same question would have been there. Because that was in
Speaker 1: an urban area. Right now, I'm I'm up, you know,
Speaker 1: deep in the mountains, heavily wooded area, but in an
Speaker 1: urban area. I would imagine that you're not allowed to
Speaker 1: put out a good pull out of gun and you know,
Speaker 1: relieve that animal of its suffering. But I know we
Speaker 1: have an awful lot of well informed folks in the audience.
Speaker 1: I'm so please do text us are called d An
Speaker 1: five seven, seven thirty nine. In the meantime, I'm trying
Speaker 1: to reach a division of wildlife and see if they
Speaker 1: can get somebody up here. But they've got a tough job, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, how do you move through the forest and
Speaker 1: everything else and find these wounded animals? All right? Texters, Dan,
Speaker 1: my ex wife would lie even when there was absolutely
Speaker 1: no reason to lie. I don't understand it, but it
Speaker 1: happens to some people. I think it's a form of paranoia.
Speaker 1: I think it's a power play. I think for many
Speaker 1: on the left I'm not talking Democrats, it's a power
Speaker 1: thing and they just revel in it. Dan, Why would
Speaker 1: Trump be satisfied with just swaying public opinion regarding Obama?
Speaker 1: If I'm understanding you correctly, public opinion about Obama will
Speaker 1: never change unless he's indicted. Most people don't care about
Speaker 1: any of this. Unfortunately, what our Texters referring to. Is
Speaker 1: this pretty significant statement from the president? Ryan, can you
Speaker 1: tee up again? Cut forty two, the President saying that
Speaker 1: Obama committed tree.
Speaker 2: If you look at that.
Speaker 3: Those papers, they have a stone called and it was
Speaker 3: President Obama.
Speaker 2: It wasn't lots of people all over the place, it
Speaker 2: was them too.
Speaker 3: But the leader of the gang was President Obama. Barack
Speaker 3: Hussein Obama. Have you heard of him? And except for
Speaker 3: the fact that he gets shielded by the press for
Speaker 3: his entire life, that's the.
Speaker 2: One they look. He's guilty. Is that a question? You know,
Speaker 2: I like to say, let's give it time. It's there.
Speaker 3: He's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you
Speaker 3: can think of. They tried to steal the election, they
Speaker 3: tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's
Speaker 3: even imagined, even in other countries.
Speaker 1: What the texture is responding to is my belief that
Speaker 1: there's not going to be a prosecution of Barack Obama.
Speaker 1: And part of the proof of that is that President
Speaker 1: Trump is of this publicly right. If his doj was
Speaker 1: actually going to bring criminal charges against Obama, I doubt
Speaker 1: very much you'd be speaking about it, you know, posting
Speaker 1: the what appeared to be AI video of Obama being arrested,
Speaker 1: et cetera, because that obviously would be a very very
Speaker 1: serious matter. And yeah, I don't think you'd be talking
Speaker 1: about it this way. I think what's going on is
Speaker 1: I think President Trump believes to his core that Barack
Speaker 1: Obama was behind this coup attempt, and that Barack Oha
Speaker 1: Obama tried to undermine this country and the Trump presidency
Speaker 1: with this false allegation of Russian collusion. I happen to
Speaker 1: personally believe that, but I also believe that there is
Speaker 1: not the type of proof you'd need to bring or
Speaker 1: prove a criminal charge, and that we'll never see Barack
Speaker 1: Obama charge.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 1: It wouldn't be treason anyway, because treason is so narrowly
Speaker 1: defined in the criminal law, and you know, you have
Speaker 1: to have an intent to betray your country, aid an enemy,
Speaker 1: et cetera. If, and I don't believe we'll see this,
Speaker 1: there was prosecution of Obama, it would more likely be
Speaker 1: on some type of conspiracy, seditious conspiracy kind of charge,
Speaker 1: which is easier to prove up. I don't think we're
Speaker 1: going to see any of that. So to the Texter's point, no,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying President Trump's going to be satisfied with
Speaker 1: just influencing public opinion about Obama.
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 1: I think President Trump needed to say this and wanted
Speaker 1: to say it because he believes it to be true
Speaker 1: and because he was the target of something this wrong
Speaker 1: and it was very bad for America. I think that's
Speaker 1: why the President is saying all this, not because he
Speaker 1: expects a prosecution. Texter Dan, have you not listened anything
Speaker 1: Trump says? He lies all the time? Wait a second,
Speaker 1: what I was talking about earlier when I asked this question.
Speaker 1: You know that the left right now, and we played
Speaker 1: the Kim Jeffrey sound right, the left lies all the time,
Speaker 1: and they lie about individuals, and they make these horrific
Speaker 1: allegations against individuals which they cannot prove. And so the
Speaker 1: question I brought up acknowledging the log in my own eye, right,
Speaker 1: But the question I brought up was was, by definition
Speaker 1: these people who are telling these very destructive lies about
Speaker 1: other people, does that mean those are people who don't
Speaker 1: believe in God? So it was more of, you know,
Speaker 1: just kind of a philosophical question at a certain point,
Speaker 1: but a very important question to America because obviously this
Speaker 1: sort of thing, you know, is very toxic for up
Speaker 1: But when he talks about I'd ask the text what
Speaker 1: kind of examples would you give of Trump lies, Because
Speaker 1: I think if somebody comes out and says, you know, hey,
Speaker 1: this is the most successful this or that of all time,
Speaker 1: nobody's ever done better at this or that, I don't
Speaker 1: put that kind of embellishment in the same category of
Speaker 1: pointing at an individual and saying, oh, yeah, that individual
Speaker 1: conspired with Russia to undermine America. You're on the Dan Capla.
Speaker 9: Show and now to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast in Lakewood.
Speaker 1: Welcome with the show.
Speaker 8: Hey, Dan, you mentioned that in your Dear if you
Speaker 8: call local law enforcement, they have a top secret number
Speaker 8: to Division of Wildlife, and it would look better if
Speaker 8: they put it down instead of you.
Speaker 1: Okay, good point, man, because I can't get through on
Speaker 1: any of the wildlife numbers. So thanks for that tip there.
Speaker 1: And do you know whether there's any circumstance where where
Speaker 1: a private citizen can put an animal down just to
Speaker 1: put it out of its misery.
Speaker 8: Not unless you want to be under investigation for the
Speaker 8: next two months.
Speaker 1: Yeah, not liking that idea. Thanks Greg Man. Appreciate the call.
Speaker 1: How about Mike and Lakewood. You're on the dan Kaplas Show.
Speaker 6: Perfinal.
Speaker 1: Okay, how you doing, my friend, I'm welling yourself great,
Speaker 1: thank you. What are you thinking? Oh?
Speaker 6: Well, yes, you can put that animal down. However, I
Speaker 6: do not do it with a rifle. If the animal
Speaker 6: is able to evade you, if it's strong enough to
Speaker 6: be able to evade you where you have to take
Speaker 6: it from a distance with a rifle or a pistol,
Speaker 6: then it's considered the possibility that animal could survive its
Speaker 6: injuries and make it out. There's a wildlife official would
Speaker 6: have to actually visualize, visually check that animal and see
Speaker 6: whether or not this should actually be put down. I
Speaker 6: have in the past euthanized animals. I've come across animals
Speaker 6: that have been hitting the road or whatnot. If you
Speaker 6: can walk up on it, and you know, for people
Speaker 6: who don't want to hear it, I'm sorry, it's not
Speaker 6: going to sound good, but I've cut their throats and
Speaker 6: bled them out, so you know it put them down.
Speaker 6: If you were able to walk up on the animal,
Speaker 6: it's not questionable. If you have to take it from
Speaker 6: a distance, then you're likely to get a ticket for
Speaker 6: hunting out of season. You're more taking an animal without tag,
Speaker 6: so you can hit some substantial trouble boys.
Speaker 1: Thank you, it's great to have that expertise. No, this
Speaker 1: would be a case unfortunately where the poor thing to
Speaker 1: can't move, so you wouldn't have that that issue there.
Speaker 1: Thank you for that texture, Dan Dow. Isn't likely do
Speaker 1: you mainly euthanize any wild animal, and you'll likely face
Speaker 1: poaching charges if you do so, and anyone finds out foolish,
Speaker 1: But that's how government works. Fascinating to me is because
Speaker 1: I would assume, you know, and I grew up in
Speaker 1: the city, et cetera, but I would assume that's what
Speaker 1: division of Wildlife does a lot? Is you mainly euthanize animals?
Speaker 1: I know from calls we've had from wildlife folks before,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of heroically devoted animal lovers in
Speaker 1: the divisions. So wouldn't you think, Ryan, they do it
Speaker 1: all the time.
Speaker 5: It's just interesting to hear the differences between you know
Speaker 5: that kind of law as I understand it am my
Speaker 5: home state of Michigan, or I would hunt all the time,
Speaker 5: and what are the protocols here?
Speaker 4: And It's going to be different in every state, and
Speaker 4: that's to be expected.
Speaker 5: But I get the point, like you have to have
Speaker 5: some plausible deniability and like you weren't just opening you know,
Speaker 5: fire like Elmer Fund, you're hunting out of season like
Speaker 5: they're saying, but that there was a clear indication that
Speaker 5: this animal was suffering and you were merely putting it
Speaker 5: out out of its misery, you are better off.
Speaker 1: You'd have to video it, right, I think that might Yeah, that.
Speaker 5: Might be the way to go, because then you have
Speaker 5: video evidence before the fact of it limping, hobbling, whatever,
Speaker 5: and at least you'd have that going in your favor.
Speaker 1: Right. Hey, On a brighter note, I think President Trump
Speaker 1: just announced a trade deal with Japan.
Speaker 5: Fifteen percent were big in Japan, Dan, We're extremely big
Speaker 5: in Japan.
Speaker 13: Dan kaplis show number one, the morning show in all
Speaker 13: of Japan.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right, texture Dan, call a CPW and nine
Speaker 1: to one one. Be ready to defend yourself if you
Speaker 1: put it down, need proof it was suffering. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: that's where I think the video would come in. And yeah,
Speaker 1: and the interesting point about ready to defend yourself, right,
Speaker 1: because I don't know, well, not.
Speaker 4: What's gone, but just defend yourself with an explanation.
Speaker 1: I think, oh oh no, I thought. I thought what
Speaker 1: the texture was saying, defend yourself in case the animal
Speaker 1: reacts as you get close.
Speaker 5: Well, for a deer, I wouldn't be that concerned, But
Speaker 5: if you were doing it with a bear, then yeah,
Speaker 5: we're a mountain lion, right.
Speaker 4: I exercised caution there.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, it. It was funny because when I was
Speaker 1: first starting to come up to the cabin to do
Speaker 1: trial prep, you know, there was a guy up here
Speaker 1: and I showed him my gun. I said, yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: I'll be okay if you know, if there's a bear issue.
Speaker 1: And he said, oh, only if you use that thing
Speaker 1: on yourself. He said, that's not going to do anything.
Speaker 4: Do you try to use a twenty two or something.
Speaker 1: No, no, no, no, no, no, just a just a
Speaker 1: nine millimeter handgun.
Speaker 4: Oh no, that wouldn't well, no one even put a
Speaker 4: debt in a bear. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I grew up in Chicago, man. The only animals I
Speaker 1: saw were on trains.
Speaker 4: Nine mills for bears.
Speaker 1: What do I know? You know, I'm pretty listen. If
Speaker 1: you're talking about home defense, I've got a lot of
Speaker 1: options and everything else, right, but yeah, but here, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I guess, thank gess he needs something.
Speaker 4: You would make that bear so angry if you shadow
Speaker 4: at the nine mil.
Speaker 1: Well, I guess this is another important question, right, And
Speaker 1: I'm sorry I'm ignorant on this stuff, But is a
Speaker 1: nine millimeter going to do the job with an injured deer?
Speaker 1: Because the last thing I want to do is add
Speaker 1: to it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I don't know. It wouldn't be my first choice
Speaker 5: of weapon in that instance. Now, Okay, you want to
Speaker 5: I mean, you want a rifle, but the you know,
Speaker 5: the caller advised against that because then it looks like
Speaker 5: you're hunting hunting with a nine milimeter.
Speaker 1: I want to get a I want to get a
Speaker 1: pro involved. Anyway, I just I just don't want this.
Speaker 1: You know, it's a beautiful creature. Even if it was ugly,
Speaker 1: I wouldn't want it to suffer. But Ryan, thank you,
Speaker 1: thank you. Another great show. And Kelly, your aura is
Speaker 1: always the highlight of the day. Hey, yeah, please join
Speaker 1: us tomorrow weather, We'll catch tomorrow God Willie on The
Speaker 1: Dame Kapner Show,